HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-04-15; Planning Commission; Resolution 7366PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 7366
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND
NONRESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A ONE-LOT
SUBDIVISION WITH 10 NONRESIDENTIAL AIRSPACE CONDOMINIUM
UNITS ON A 12.4-ACRE SITE PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED WITH 10 EXISTING
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS LOCATED AT 2720-2738 LOKER AVENUE
WEST IN THE P-M (PLANNED INDUSTRIAL) ZONE, AND LOCAL FACILITIES
MANAGEMENT ZONE 5.
CASE NAME: LOKER AVENUE
CASE NO.: CT 2019-0005/PUD 2019-0005
WHEREAS, HG FENTON CO., "Owner," has filed a verified application with the City of Carlsbad
regarding property described as
Parcel 1:
Parcel A of certificate of compliance recorded July 3, 1990 as instr.# 90-362938, of official records, said
certificate of compliance being a boundary adjustment of parcels A and B of certificate of compliance
recorded June 16, 1986 as instr.#86-240751 of official records, said certificate of compliance being a
consolidation and boundary adjustment of lots 3 through 6 of map no. 10372 filed in the office of the
county recorder of San Diego county, April 12, 1982; together with dolphin court as vacated by
resolution no. 8553, recorded in the office of said county recorder June 16, 1986 as instr. # 86-240752
of official records
Beginning at the southwesterly corner of said parcel A; thence along the westerly boundary of said
parcel a north 2° 37' 29" west, 459.83 feet; thence leaving said boundary north 89° 17' 49" east, 155.07
feet; thence.south 58° 57' 57" east, 328.77 feet to a 90.00 foot radius curve concave northerly, thence
easterly along the arc of said curve 77.80 feet through a central angle of 49 degrees, 31' 37"; thence
radially to said curve south 18° 29' 34" east 35.92 feet; thence south 33°00' 00" east 78.00 feet; thence
north 55° 04' 46" east 17.00 feet to a non-tangent 100.00 foot radius curve concave northeasterly a
radial line to said curve bears south 55° 04' 46" west; thence southeasterly along the arc of said curve
31.25 feet through a central angle of 17° 54' 22"; thence south 52° 49' 36" east 25.14 feet (south 52°
49' 35" east 25.00 feet of record) to a point on the northwesterly right of way of Loker Avenue as
shown on said map 10372 said point being also on the arc of a non-tangent 536.00 foot radius curve
concave southeasterly a radial line to said curve bears north 55° 43' 29' west; (north 55 degrees 42'
50" west of record) thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 28.62 feet through a central angle
of 3° 03' 32" (28.75 feet through a centra.I angle of 03 degrees 04' 23" of record); thence south 31 ° 12'
59" west 275.67 feet (south 31° 12' 47" west 275.74 feet of record); thence north 58° 48' 20" west
222.57 feet (north 58 degrees 47' 13" West 222.48 feet of record); thence south 87° 21' 26" west 251.61
feet (south 87° 22' 31" west 251.50 feet of record) to the point of beginning.
Parcel 2:
Those portions of parcels A and B of certificate of compliance recorded June 16, 1986 as instr.# 86-
240751 of official records said certificate of compliance being a consolidation and boundary
adjustment of lots 3 through 6 of map no. 10372 and dolphin court as vacated and closed to public use,
in the City of Carlsbad, county of San Diego, State of California, described as follows:
Beginning at the northeasterly corner of said parcel b; thence south 26° 32' 15" east 544.56 feet to a
point on the northwesterly right of way of Loker Avenue as shown on said map rio. 10372 said point
being also a point on a non-tangent 536.00 foot radius curve concave southeasterly a radial line to
said curve bears north 26° 32' 15" west; thence southwesterly along the arc of said curve 272.94 feet
through a central angle of 29° 10' 35"; thence leaving said right of way north 52° 49' 35" west 25.00
feet; to a 100.00 foot radius curve concave northeasterly; thence northwesterly along the arc of said
curve 31.25 feet through a central angle of 17° 54' 22"; thence radially to said curve south 55° 04' 46"
west 17.00 feet thence north 33° 00' 00" west 78.00 feet; thence north 18° 29' 34" west 35.94 feet; to
a non-tangent 90.00 foot radius curve concave northerly A
Radial line to said curve bears south 18° 29' 34 east; thence westerly along the arc of said curve 77.80
feet through a central angle of 49° 31' 37"; thence north 58° 57' 57" west 328.77 feet; thence south
89° 17' 49" west 155.07 feet to the westerly boundary of said parcel b; thence along the westerly
boundary of said parcel b north 2° 37' 29" west 197.17 feet; thence north 61° 49' 29" east 354 .09 feet;
thence south 89° 29' OS" east 278.01 feet to the point of beginning
("the Property"); and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Tentative Tract Map and
Nonresidential Planned Development Permit as shown on Exhibit "A" dated April 15, 2020, on file in the
Planning Division CT 2019-0005/PUD 2019-0005 -LOKER AVENUE, as provided by Chapter 20 .12 and
Chapter 21.47 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on April 15, 2020, hold a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if
any, of persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Tentative Tract
Map and Non-Residential Planned Development Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES
CT 2019-0005/PUD 2019-0005 -LOKER AVENUE, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
Findings:
Tentative Tract Map
1. That the proposed map and the proposed design and improvement of the subdivision as
conditioned, is consistent with and satisfies all requirements of the General Plan, any applicable
specific plans, Titles 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, and the State Subdivision Map Act,
and will not cause serious public health problems, in that the proposed subdivision is designed
PC RESO NO. 7366 -2-
to comply with the minimum requirements of the General Plan, Title 20, Title 21, and Specific
Plan 200(8).
2. That the proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land uses since surrounding
properties are designated for Planned Industrial development on the General Plan, and in that
the site is already developed and surrounding properties to the south, west and east are
designated for and/or developed with Planned Industrial land uses. The area to the north is
designated Open Space.
3. That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the development since the site is
adequate in size and shape to accommodate development at the density proposed, in that the
project is a subdivision, and no development is proposed. The existing buildings currently meet
all development standards and public facilities requirements without the need for variances
from any of the development standards.
4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements
of record or easements established by court judgment, or acquired by the public at large, for
access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, in that concurrent with the
recordation of the final map the developer will vacate and adjust any easements that conflict
with the proposed subdivision.
5. That the property is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the Land Conservation Act
of 1965 (Williamson Act).
6. That the design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural
heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, in that structures are oriented in such a
manner which allows for adequate building separation for solar exposure and circulation of air.
7. That the design of the subdivision and improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, in
that the proposed subdivision does not alter the physical development of the site. Moreover,
although the project was developed prior to the adoption of the Carlsbad Habitat Management
Plan the site maintains the required buffer from the Hard line Preserve area in the open space
north of the site.
8. That the discharge of waste from the subdivision will not result in violation of existing California
Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements, in that the project has been designed in
accordance with the Best Management Practices for water quality protection in accordance
with the City's sewer and drainage standards and the project is conditioned to comply with the
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.
Nonresidential Planned Development Permit
9. That the granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with the Municipal
Code including all the minimum development standards of the underlying zone except for lot area,
the General Plan, applicable specific plans, master plans, and all adopted plans of the city and
other governmental agencies, in that the proposed project is consistent with the Planned
Industrial (Pl) General Plan Land Use designation and all development standards of the Planned
Industrial (P-M~ Zone and Specific Plan 200(8) as well as Titles 20 and 21 regulations governing
subdivisions and the design of nonresidential planned developments.
PC RESO NO. 7366 -3-
10. That proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to provide a service or
facility which will contribute to the general well-being of the neighborhood and the community,
in that the proposed nonresidential planned development will be located on the existing P-M
zoned lot. The project is compatible with the surrounding industrial and open space uses and
will provide opportunities for individual ownership of existing light industrial buildings.
11. That such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing
or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, in that the
project meets all applicable city standards and ordinances, including the McClellan-Palomar
Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, and all public facilities and services are already developed.
The existing access to the site from Loker Avenue is adequate for the proposed airspace
condominiums. The subdivision includes all necessary features to be compatible with
surrounding development. The nonresidential planned development will not pose a safety
hazard to the occupants of the surrounding industrial and open space uses.
General
12. The Planning Commission finds that the project, as conditioned herein, is in conformance with
the Elements of the city's General Plan, Specific Plan 200(8) based on the facts set forth in the
staff report dated April 15, 2020 including, but not limited to the following: (a) Land Use -the
proposed subdivision of existing office/industrial buildings are consistent with the Planned
Industrial (Pl) General Plan Land Use and Planned Industrial (P-M) Zoning designations for the
site, (b) Mobility -all existing roadways and improvements are necessary to serve the existing
development, and no additional improvements are required, (c) Noise -The project is located
outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contour of Palomar Airport, and the existing buildings have
been sound attenuated to meet the 55 dBA CNEL interior noise level standards for
nonresidential construction.
13. The project is consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities
Management Plan for Zone 5 and all city public facility policies and ordinances. The project
includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or provide funding to ensure that all
facilities and improvements regarding sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage;
circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational facilities; libraries; government
administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be . installed to serve new
development prior to or concurrent with need.
14. The project has been conditioned to pay any increase in public facility fee, or new construction
tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by
a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative
impacts created by the project.
15. This project has been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5.
16. That all necessary public facilities required by the Growth Management Ordinance will be
constructed or are guaranteed to be constructed concurrently with the need for them created by
this project and in compliance with adopted city standards, in that all public roads, water and
sewer systems have been constructed with the prior development of the site and no new
facilities are required.
PC RESO NO. 7366 -4-
17. The project is cor1sistent with the adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the McClellan-
Palomar Airport (ALUCP), dated December 1, 2011, in that the project is located within the
Airport Influence Area and Flight Activity Zone and office/industrial/warehouse development
is considered to be a low-intensity use which does not involve assemblages of large groups of
people. Portions of three buildings are in Safety Zone 2 and the rest in Safety Zone 4, however
the existing uses onsite, light industrial in nature, comply with the safety compatibility criteria
of the ALUCP. The project is compatible with the projected noise levels of the ALUCP; and, based
on the noise/land use compatibility matrix of the ALUCP, the proposed land use is compatible
with the airport, in that the project site is located outside the 60 CNEL noise level contour lines,
and the existing buildings are sufficiently attenuated by conventional construction that the
indoor noise level is acceptable, and both indoor and outdoor activities associated with the
existing land use may continue to be carried out with essentially no interference from aircraft
noise.
18. The City Planner has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State
Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is
therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation-of environmental
documents pursuant to Section 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) Class 15 Categorical Exemption of
the State CEQA Guidelines. In addition, the project does not involve the use of hazardous
substances. In making this determination, the City Planner has found that the exceptions listed
in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not apply to this project.
19. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer
contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to
mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the degree
of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project.
Conditions:
NOTE: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to recordation of the Final
Map.
1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented
and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained
according to their terms, the city shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein
granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke, or further
condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted;
record a notice of violation on the property title; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their
compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained
by Developer or a successor in interest by the city's approval of this Tentative Tract Map and
Nonresidential Planned Development Permit.
2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and
modifications to the Tentative Tract Map and Nonresidential Planned Development Permit
documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final
action on the project. Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits.
Any proposed development, different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this
approval.
3. Developer shall comply with all applicable prov1s1ons of federal, state, and local laws and
regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
PC RESO NO. 7366 -5-
4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any .
fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project are challenged,
this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such
condition is determined to be invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council
determines that the project without the condition complies with all requirements of law.
5. Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold
harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and
costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the city arising, directly or indirectly,
from (a) city's approval and issuance of this Tentative Tract Map and Non Residential Planned
Development Permit, (b) city's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether
discretionary or nondiscretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c)
Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including
without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the facility of
electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal
proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the city's approval is not validated.
6. Prior to submittal of the final map the developer shall submit to the City Planner, a 24" x 3611 copy
of the Tentative Map, reflecting the conditions approved by the final decision making body. The
copy shall be submitted to the City Planner, reviewed and, if found acceptable, signed by the city's
project planner and project engineer. If no changes were required, the approved exhibits shall
fulfill this condition.
7. This project shall comply with all conditions which are required as part of the Zone 5 Local
Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of
building permits.
8. Developer shall pay the Citywide Public Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, the
License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD
#1 special tax (if applicable), subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone
5, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If
the taxes/fees are not paid, this approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall
become void.
9. Prior to the recordation of the Final Map, Developer shall submit to the city a Notice of Restriction
executed by the owner of the real property to be developed. Said notice is to be filed in the office
of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the City Planner, notifying all interested
parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a(n) Tentative Tract Map
and Nonresidential Planned Development Permit by Resolution(s) No. 7366 on the property.
Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing
complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions
specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The City Planner has the authority to execute
and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing
of good cause by the Developer or successor in interest.
10. Developer shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding covenants, conditions
and restrictions (CC&Rs). Said CC&Rs shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior
to final map approval. The CC&Rs shall adequately address the maintenance of all common
PC RESO NO. 7366 -6-
landscape areas, employee eating areas, and paved access and parking areas. Prior to
rec'ordation of the Final Map the Developer shall provide the Planning Division with a draft copy
of the official CC&Rs. The approved CC&Rs shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map.
At a minimum, the CC&Rs shall contain the following provisions:
a.
b.
C.
General Enforcement by the city: The city shall have the right, but not the obligation, to
enforce those Protective Covenants set forth in this Declaration in favor of, or in which
the city has an interest.
Notice and Amendment: A copy of any proposed amendment shall be provided to the
city in advance. If the proposed amendment affects the city, the city shall have the right
to disapprove. A copy of the final approved amendment shall be transmitted to the city
within 30 days for the official record.
Failure of Association to Maintain Common Area Lots and Easements: In the event that
the Association fails to maintain the "Common Area Lots and/or the Association's
Easements" as provided in Article _____ ~ Section ______ the city shall
have the right, but not the duty, to perform the necessary maintenance. If the city elects
to perform such maintenance, the city shall give written notice to the Association, with a
copy thereof to the Owners in the Project, setting forth with particu,ai-ity the
maintenance which the city finds to be required and requesting the same be carried out
by the Association within a period of thirty (30) days from the giving of such notice. In
the event that the Association fails to carry out such maintenance of the Common Area
Lots and/or Association's Easements within the period specified by the city's notice, the
city shall be entitled to cause such work to be completed and shall be entitled to
reimbursement with respect thereto from the Owners as provided herein.
d. Special Assessments Levied by the city: In the event thedty has performed the necessary
maintenance to either Common Area Lots and/or Association's Easements, the city shall
submit a written invoice to the Association for all costs incurred by the city to perform
such maintenance of the Common Area Lots and or Association;s Easements. The city
shall provide a copy of such invoice to each Owner in the Project, together with a
statement that if the Association fails to pay such invoice in full within the time specified,
the city will pursue collection against the Owners in the Project pursuant to the provisions
of this Section. Said invoice shall be due and payable by the Association within twenty
{20) days of receipt by the Association. If the Association shall fail to pay such invoice in
full within the period specified, payment shall be deemed delinquent and shall be subject
to a late charge in an amount equal to six percent (6%) of the amount of the invoice.
Thereafter the city may pursue collection from the Association by means of any remedies
available at law or in equity. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in addition
to all other rights and remedies available to the city, the city may levy a special assessment
against the Owners of each Lot in the Project for an equal pro rata share of the invoice,·
plus the late charge. Such special assessment shall constitute a charge on the land and
shall be a continuing lien upon each Lot against which the special assessment is levied.
Each Owner in the Project hereby vests the city with the right and power to levy such
special assessment, to impose a lien upon their respective Lot and to bring all legal actions
and/or to pursue lien foreclosure procedures against any Owner and his/her respective
Lot for purposes of collecting such special assessment in accordance with the procedures
set forth in Article _____ of this Declaration.
PC RESO NO. 7366 -7-
e. Landscape Maintenance Responsibilities: The property owner's association and
individual unit owner landscape maintenance responsibilities shall be as set forth in
Exhibit "A".
11. A joint reciprocal parking agreement shall be submitted for review and approval by the City
Planner, City Engineer, and City Attorney. The agreement shall provide for the following:
a. The sharing in perpetuity of all parking and access aisles/driveways onsite, and between
all the uses proposed for the project.
b. The agreement shall not be modified without the prior written approval of the City
Planner, City Engineer, and City Attorney.
c. A copy of the joint use parking agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the County
Recorder and copies filed with the City Planner concurrently with the recordation of the
Final Map.
12. This project shall comply with all conditions required as part of the Planned Industrial Permit
(PIP 86-0l(B)) approval dated October 8, 2008.
13. The location and size of all employee eating areas, parking spaces, and landscape areas shall
not be altered, reduced, fenced, or divided to preclude the equal use by all owners/employees
of the site.
14. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and
concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in substance
as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of
Community and Development Department and Planning.
Engineering
15. Developer shall submit to the city engineer an acceptable instrument, via CC&Rs and/or other
recorded document, addressing the maintenance, repair, and replacement of shared private
improvements within this subdivision, including but not limited to private utilities, sidewalks,
landscaping, parking spaces, driveways, parking lot lighting, storm drain facilities, etc. located
therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners ·
of the properties within this subdivision.
16. Developer shall prepare, submit and process for city engineer approval a final map to subdivide
this project. There shall be one Final Map r ecorded for this project. Developer shall pay the city
standard map review plan check fees.
17. Developer shall install sight distance corridors at all street intersections and driveways in
accordance with City Engineering Standards. The property owner shall maintain this condition.
18. Property owner shall maintain all landscaping (street trees, tree grates, shrubs, groundcover, etc.)
and irrigation along the parkway frontage with Loker Avenue as shown on the Tentative Map/Site
Plan.
PC RESO NO. 7366 -8-
Storm Water Quality
19. Developer shall comply with the city's Stormwater Regulations, latest version, and shall
implement best management practices at all times. Best management practices include but are
not limited to pollution control practices or devices, erosion control to prevent silt runoff during
construction, general housekeeping practices, pollution prevention and educational practices,
maintenance procedures, and other management practices or devices to prevent or reduce the
discharge of pollutants to stormwater, receiving water or stormwater conveyance system to the
maximum extent practicable. Developer shall notify prospective owners and tenants of the above
requirements.
Dedications/Improvements
20. Developer shall abandon those public easements or portions of public easements on the final
map or vacate said easements by separate instrument, all as identified on the tentative map.
Non-Mapping Notes
21. Add the following notes to the final map as non-mapping data:
A. No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object may be placed or permitted to
encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor as defined by City of
Carlsbad Engineering Standards or line-of-sight per Caltrans standards.
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
An appeal of this decision to the City Council must be filed with the City Clerk at 1200 Carlsbad Village
Drive, Carlsbad, California, 92008, within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the Planning Commission's
decision. Pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Chapter 21.54, section 21.54.150, the appeal must be in
writing and state the reason(s) for the appeal. The City Council must make a determination on the appeal
prior to any judicial review.
PC RESO NO. 7366 -9-
NOTICE
Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications,
reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as "fees/exactions."
You have 90 days from date of approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest
them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020{a) and file the
protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with
Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent
legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT
APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading, or other
similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute
of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of
Carlsbad, California, held on April 15, 2020, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Chair Anderson, Commissioners Geidner, Lafferty, Luna, Meenes, Merz, and Stine
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
VELYN ANDERSON, Chair
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
DON NEU
City Planner
PC RESO NO. 7366 · -10-