HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDP 2019-0023; HERNANDEZ RESIDENCE; FINAL SOILS REPORT; 2021-10-20
GEOTECHNICAL | ENVIRONMENTAL | MATERIALS
October 20, 2021
Project No. 3592.1-SD
San Diego Building
38 Pine Avenue
San Carlos, California 94070
Attention: Mr. Wyatt Van Driessche
Subject: Final Report of Geotechnical Observation and Testing
3677 Garfield Street
Carlsbad, California
Dear Mr. Van Driessche:
In accordance with your request, GeoTek, Inc. (GeoTek) has prepared this letter to summarize
the completion of the earthwork construction associated with the subject property. The
summary includes rough grading and post grading activities.
Rough grading and earthwork construction were completed under the observation and
selective testing by GeoTek between August 21st, 2020, and March 26th, 2020, as described in
the previous Geotechnical Report dated August 31st, 2020 (GeoTek, 2020b). Post grading
geotechnical observation and testing were performed on October 20th and 21st, 2020.
SUMMARY OF GEOLOGIC AND SOILS CONDITIONS
Based on our field observations and testing during remedial grading, we note the following:
Remedial grading consisted of removal of unsuitable surficial material to bedrock (Paralic
deposits).
Overexcavated of the building pad was excavated to a depth of a least 12 inches below
proposed foundations and brought to design pad grade elevations with engineered fill.
Engineered fill was placed and compacted to at least 90% and near optimum moisture
content relative to ASTM D 1557 test procedures at the test locations.
A seepage pit system was encountered below the proposed building. The system was
removed down to bedrock to an elevation of 49 feet above mean sea level.
GeoTek, Inc.
1384 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite A Vista, CA 92081-8505
(760) 599-0509 Off, (760) 599-0593 Fa. www.geotekusa.com
SAN DIEGO BUILDING, INC. October 20, 2021
Final Geotechnical As-Built Report Project No. 3592.1-SD
3677 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, California Page 2
The backfill for the utility tie-in connections from the curb to the utility’s point of
connection with the main line was tested to be to be at least 95% relative compaction as
determined by ASTM D1557 test procedures at the test locations.
Aggregate base (crushed miscellaneous base) placement was observed and tested to be
to be at least 95% relative compaction as determined by plant provided information at
the test locations.
Asphalt concrete placement was observed and tested to be to be at least 95% relative
compaction as determined by plant provided information at the test locations.
Residential building foundation footings were observed and qualitatively evaluated with a
soil probe to be firm and unyielding.
Visual classification of the soil in the field, compared to the soil description from
laboratory testing, was the basis for determining the maximum dry density value and
optimum moisture content applied to each soil density test. Manufactured materials,
such as aggregate base and hot mixed asphalt, the supplier was contacted for maximum
density values.
Field and Laboratory Testing
FIELD TESTING
Field density tests were taken at periodic intervals and random locations to check the
compaction efforts by the grading contractors. The field density testing for the subject site
was performed using a nuclear gauge, in general accordance with testing procedure ASTM D
6938 for soils. The results of the field density testing conducted for the herein reported site
area are included in the attached Tables 1 and presented on Figure 1.
LABORATORY TESTING
The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content for the soils were
determined in general accordance with test method ASTM D 1557. The table below presents
the soil type used for this project.
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT TEST RESULTS (ASTM D 1557)
Soil Type Description Maximum Dry
Density (pcf)
Optimum Moisture
Content (%)
A Reddish Brown Sand with Silt 123.9 9.5
GEOTEK
SAN DIEGO BUILDING, INC. October 20, 2021
Final Geotechnical As-Built Report Project No. 3592.1-SD
3677 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, California Page 3
CONCLUSIONS
Site grading has been completed in general accordance with the approved geotechnical reports
(GeoTek, 2019a and 2020a), applicable provisions of the 2019 California Building Code (CBC)
and city of Carlsbad guidelines.
Preliminary foundation recommendations were presented in our 2019 report and were
considered to be final.
If a significant amount of time elapses between the grading and reprocessing reported as part of
this report and start of home construction, building pads may require additional reprocessing.
The reprocessing should include moisture conditioning to a minimum content of optimum
moisture based on ASTM D1557 and to a depth of at least a 12-inches prior to excavation of
foundation footings.
The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you should have any questions,
please do not hesitate to call our office.
Respectfully submitted,
GeoTek, Inc.
Christopher D. Livesey Gaby M. Bogdanoff
CEG 2733, Exp. 05/31/23 GE 3133, Exp. 06/30/22
Associate Vice President Project Engineer
Distribution: (1) Addressee via email
Enclosures: Figure 1 – Field Density Test Location Map
Table 1 – Field Density Tests
GEOTEK
SAN DIEGO BUILDING, INC. October 20, 2021
Final Geotechnical As-Built Report Project No. 3592.1-SD
3677 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, California Page 4
REFERENCES
GeoTek, Inc, 2019, Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, 3677 Garfield Street Carlsbad,
California, Project No. 3592-SD, dated October 18, 2019.
_____, 2020a, Plan Review and Response to Review Comments, 3677 Garfield Street,
Carlsbad, California, Project No. 3592-SD, dated February 16, 2020.
_____, 2020b, Letter of Completion of Rough Grading, 3677 Garfield Street, Carlsbad,
California, Project No. 3592.1-SD, dated August 31, 2020.
GEOTEK
Hernandez Residence
3677 Garfield Street
Carlsbad, CA 92008
GeoTek, Inc.
Grading 8/28/2020
Project No.: 3592.1-SD
Page 1 of 1
DATE Test
No.Location Lot
No.
Sta
No.
Elev/
Depth
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Soil
Type
Maximum
Density
(pcf)
Test
Type
Relative
Compaction
(%)
08/21/20 1 House Pad - Seepage Pit 1 N/A 51.0 10.5 115.3 A 123.9 N 93
08/21/20 2 House Pad - Seepage PIt 1 N/A 53.0 11.0 114.2 A 123.9 N 92
08/21/20 3 House Pad - Seepage Pit 1 N/A 54.0 10.2 116.7 A 123.9 N 94
08/21/20 4 House Pad - West 1 N/A 56.0 10.8 115.8 A 123.9 N 93
08/21/20 5 House Pad - South 1 N/A 57.0 9.9 115.6 A 123.9 N 93
08/21/20 6 House Pad - Northeast 1 N/A 56.0 10.0 118.2 A 123.9 N 95
08/21/20 7 House Pad - North 1 N/A 56.0 10.7 119.1 A 123.9 N 96
08/24/20 8 House Pad - West 1 N/A 59.0 10.2 116.2 A 123.9 N 94
08/25/20 9 House Pad Southeast 1 N/A FG 10.9 120.1 A 123.9 N 97
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Grading
Note:
N = Nuclear Guage Test
FG = Finished Grade Test
All elevations are approximate
3677 Garfield
Carlsbad, CA GeoTek, Inc.
Utility Tie-In Backfill
10/8/2021
Project No.: 3592.1-SD
DATE Test
No.Location Lot
No.
Sta
No.
Elev/
Depth
Moisture
Content
(%)
Dry
Density
(pcf)
Soil
Type
Maximum
Density
(pcf)
Test
Type
Relative
Compaction
(%)
10/21/20 1 Garfield Street SG 10.3 121.1 A 123.9 N 98
2 Garfield Street AB 9.6 119.9 AB* 122.0 N 98
3 Garfield Street AC 143.5 AC* 148.0 N 97
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS
Utility Tie-In Backfill
Note:
N = Nuclear Guage Test
FG = Finished Grade Test
All elevations are approximate
*Plant Provided Value
213456789AfAfQopQop<Outside of Project Area><Outside of Project Area>545549551384 Poinsettia Avenue, Suite AVista, California 92081PN: 3592.1-SDDATE: October 2019Figure 1Field Density Test Location MapHernadez Residence3677 Garfield StreetCarlsbad, CA0 5 1020Scale: 1" = 10'NPlan adapted from "Precise Grading Plan" by Chereskin ArchitectureLegend Approximate Location of Field Density Test Approximate Limits of Site Approximate Limits of Remedial Grading Seepage Pit Approximate Location of Removal Bottom (Elevation) Artificial Fill Paralic Deposits (Circled)954AfQop59.20 "G .. ... .. ..... . r-·' 0 . 59~50 ~·=..:,J;,, j, ES--.w&_ -APN: 204-232-05 APN: 204-232-0J PROP. ·G1S' ME1ER PROP; El.E.CTRIC METER 62.50 ffi 62. ', SB.a 0 D C)