HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-11-02; City Council; ; Introduce an Ordinance to Install Stop Signs on Cerezo Drive at Los Robles DriveMeeting Date: Nov. 2, 2021
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Scott Chadwick, City Manager
Staff Contact: John Kim, City Traffic Engineer
john.kim@carlsbadca.gov, 760-602-2757
Subject:
District:
Introduce an Ordinance to Install Stop Signs on Cerezo Drive at Los
Robles Drive
2
Recommended Action
Introduction of an ordinance amending Title 10, Chapter 10.28 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
by adding Section 10.28.996 to install stop signs on Cerezo Drive at Los Robles Drive.
Executive Summary
On June 7, 2021, the Traffic and Mobility Commission received concerns from Terramar
residents regarding traffic and pedestrian safety along Cerezo Drive, including requests for stop
signs. According to the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which is the
state’s standard for traffic signs, road surface markings and traffic signals, such stop signs can
be considered as a safety measure at intersections where there are safety concerns with
pedestrians and bicyclists.
The intersection of Cerezo Drive at Los Robles Drive was evaluated for stop signs based on the
guidelines provided by the manual. Based on this analysis and upon the recommendation of the
Traffic and Mobility Commission, staff recommends installation of stop signs on Cerezo Drive at
Los Robles Drive.
Discussion
Cerezo Drive is a residential street in the coastal area of the city located in what is known as the
Terramar neighborhood. It extends from Carlsbad Boulevard to El Arbol Drive and is
approximately 560 feet long. The roadway has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Cerezo Drive has
a roadway width of 36 feet, which accommodates a single vehicle lane and parking in each
direction. On-street parking is allowed on both sides of the street where red curbs are not
present. There is rolled curb and gutter on both sides, but no continuous sidewalks.
The intersection of Cerezo Drive and Los Robles Drive, approximately 240 feet east of Carlsbad
Boulevard, features stop signs on Los Robles Drive. The properties along these roads are single
family homes. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the neighborhood can be significant because
of its proximity to beach access.
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 1 of 34
On June 7, 2021, several Terramar residents appeared at the Traffic and Mobility Commission
to express their concerns about various traffic issues, including pedestrian safety. Pedestrian
access may be enhanced by offering controlled pedestrian crossings at intersections, so staff
conducted an analysis at the intersection of Cerezo Drive and Los Robles Drive to see if
installing stop signs could be supported. The analysis, which is found in the California Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, considers vehicular and pedestrian volumes, as well as
other factors to determine whether stop signs are justified at a particular location.
Criteria A of the manual’s, multi-way stop applications criteria allows consideration of stop
signs as an interim measure prior to the installation of a traffic signal. There are no plans for a
traffic signal at this location, so Criteria A was not satisfied.
Criteria B allows for consideration of stop signs when there have been five or more reported
collisions within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by all-way stop control.
An analysis of the collision history at the subject location determined there have been zero
reported collisions in the past five years, so Criteria B was not satisfied.
Criteria C looks at traffic volumes to determine if stop signs can be considered. Criteria C is
satisfied if:
1. The average major street volume, in this case on Cerezo Drive, is at least 300 vehicles
per hour for any eight hours of an average day, and
2. The combined vehicular, pedestrians and bicycle volume entering the intersection from
the minor street (Los Robles Drive) approaches averages at least 200 units per hour for
the same eight hours
Twenty-four-hour traffic counts were conducted Tuesday May 25, 2021, and Saturday July 17,
2021 (Exhibit 3). The highest average major street volume was found to be 118 vehicles per
hour. The highest hourly combined pedestrian and bicycle volumes was found to be 25 units.
The volume requirements were not met, so Criteria C was not satisfied.
Criteria D allows consideration of stop signs where no single criterion is satisfied, but where
Criteria B and C are satisfied to 80% of the minimum values. Criteria D was not satisfied.
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 2 of 34
In addition to the four criteria listed above, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
includes optional criteria which can also be considered. The optional criteria are described as:
A. The need to control left-turn conflicts;
B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high
pedestrian volumes;
C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able
to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood through streets of similar design and
operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic
operational characteristics of the intersection.
The popular beach destinations near the intersection of Cerezo Drive and Los Robles Drive
generate high-pedestrian volumes. Combined pedestrian and bicycle volumes at the
intersection during the peak hour were found to be 25 units. Furthermore, concerns from
residents have described conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles at this intersection.
Optional Criteria B is therefore considered satisfied.
Residents have also raised concerns about limited visibility at the intersection. Although
recently issued work orders for additional red curb have increased sight distance somewhat,
Optional Criteria C is considered satisfied. Results of the multi-way stop criteria application are
shown in Exhibit 4.
Traffic and Mobility Commission recommendation
On Sept. 7, 2021, the Traffic and Mobility Commission supported staff’s recommendation to
install stop signs on Cerezo Drive at Los Robles Drive with a vote of 5-0-0-1, with Commissioner
Fowler absent and one commissioner position vacant. The approved minutes from this meeting
are attached as Exhibit 5.
Based on staff findings, which are consistent with the recommendation found in the California
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and upon the recommendation of the Traffic and
Mobility Commission, staff recommend the installation of stop signs on Cerezo Drive at Los
Robles Drive.
Options
Staff provide the following options for the City Council’s consideration:
1. Accept staff’s recommendation to install stop signs on Cerezo Drive at Los Robles Drive
Pros
• Enhances pedestrian safety
• Addresses sight-distance concerns at intersection
Cons
• None identified
2. Reject staff’s recommendation to install stop signs on Cerezo Drive at Los Robles Drive
Pros
• None identified
Cons
• Pedestrian safety and sight-distance concerns highlighted by the community will
not be addressed
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 3 of 34
Fiscal Analysis
Installation of the two new stop signs, four new “All-Way” plaques and associated striping will
cost approximately $2,500. There are sufficient funds in the fiscal year 2021-22 Street
Maintenance Operating Budget to procure and install the proposed signage and striping.
Next Steps
After adoption of the ordinance, staff will install appropriate signage and striping on Cerezo
Drive at Los Robles Drive.
Environmental Evaluation
The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under CEQA Guidelines
Section 15301(c), which applies to the minor alteration of existing facilities including streets,
sidewalks, gutters and similar facilities, including pedestrian crossings, involving negligible or no
expansion.
Public Notification
This item was noticed in keeping with the Ralph M. Brown Act and was available for public
viewing and review at least 72 hours before the scheduled meeting date., The public will be
notified before the installation of the stop signs using methods such as signage, email, website
and other city communication channels.
Exhibits
1.City Council ordinance
2.Location map
3.Traffic volume counts
4.California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Multi-Way Stop Application
worksheet
5.Approved Traffic & Mobility Commission Sept. 7, 2021, meeting minutes
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 4 of 34
ORDINANCE NO. CS-409
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 10, CHAPTER 10.28 OF THE CARLSBAD
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ADD SECTION 10.28.996 TO PLACE STOP SIGNS ON
CEREZO DRIVE AT LOS ROBLES DRIVE
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, hereby ordains as follows:
That Title 10, Chapter 10.28 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is amended by the addition of
Section 10.28.996 to read as follows:
10.28.996 Cerezo Drive.
Drivers shall stop where the following described street intersects Cerezo Drive:
Los Robles Drive.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption; and the City
Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and cause the full text of the ordinance or a summary
of the ordinance prepared by the City Attorney to be published at least once in a newspaper of general
circulation in the City of Carlsbad within fifteen days after its adoption.
INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a Regular Meeting of the Carlsbad City Council on the Jnd day
of November 2021, and thereafter
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the_ day of ___ _, 2021, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
CELIA A. BREWER, City Attorney MATT HALL, Mayor
FAVIOLA MEDINA,
City Clerk Services Manager
(SEAL)
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 5 of 34
2
LOCATION MAP
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 6 of 34
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA21_040091_006
NB SB EB WB
0 0 676 530
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 6 1700:15 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 10 10 2000:30 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 9 7 1600:45 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 0 1 31 7 30 8 6101:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 13 2301:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 2201:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 16 9 2501:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 13 50 9 42 22 9202:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 11 3102:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 702:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 7 1602:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 43 10 31 20 7403:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 13 3003:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 9 2103:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 24 19 4303:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 14 67 8 49 22 11604:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 19 4604:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 7 1704:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 6 1904:45 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 9 59 7 39 16 9805:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12 4105:15 0 0 3 2 5 0 0 19 13 3205:30 0 0 4 3 7 0 0 24 6 3005:45 0 0 3 10 4 9 7 19 0 0 19 91 7 38 26 12906:00 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 24 13 3706:15 0 0 8 3 11 0 0 10 10 2006:30 0 0 5 6 11 0 0 11 9 2006:45 0 0 5 19 8 17 13 36 0 0 3 48 5 37 8 8507:00 0 0 5 4 9 0 0 14 19 3307:15 0 0 5 7 12 0 0 16 11 2707:30 0 0 8 8 16 0 0 12 11 2307:45 0 0 10 28 14 33 24 61 0 0 10 52 10 51 20 10308:00 0 0 6 3 9 0 0 9 5 1408:15 0 0 4 3 7 0 0 7 4 1108:30 0 0 8 9 17 0 0 3 4 708:45 0 0 6 24 7 22 13 46 0 0 6 25 2 15 8 4009:00 0 0 7 10 17 0 0 6 4 1009:15 0 0 13 12 25 0 0 2 1 309:30 0 0 11 10 21 0 0 5 3 809:45 0 0 10 41 16 48 26 89 0 0 1 14 1 9 2 2310:00 0 0 4 6 10 0 0 0 010:15 0 0 7 8 15 0 0 3 2 510:30 0 0 6 7 13 0 0 0 010:45 0 0 14 31 9 30 23 61 0 0 2 5 0 2 2 711:00 0 0 7 4 11 0 0 3 2 511:15 0 0 9 8 17 0 0 1 0 111:30 0 0 8 3 11 0 0 0 011:45 0 0 8 32 7 22 15 54 0 0 0 4 0 2 6
TOTALS 187 185 372 489 345 834
SPLIT %50.3%49.7%30.8%58.6%41.4%69.2%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 676 530
AM Peak Hour 09:00 09:00 09:00 17:00 15:15 15:15
AM Pk Volume 41 48 89 91 55 132
Pk Hr Factor 0.788 0.750 0.856 0.784 0.724 0.717
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 52 55 107 0 0 150 77 227
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 17:00 16:00 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 29 33 61 0 0 91 39 129
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.725 0.589 0.635 0.000 0.000 0.784 0.513 0.787
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,206
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesVOLUME
Cerezo Dr W/O Los Robles Dr
Tuesday
5/25/2021
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,206
EXHIBIT 3
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 7 of 34
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA21_040126_003
NB SB EB WB
0 0 864 735
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB00:00 2 2 4 15 8 23 00:15 0 1 1 19 13 3200:30 0 1 1 10 9 1900:45 4 6 3 7 7 13 16 60 14 44 30 10401:00 3 0 3 17 18 3501:15 1 0 1 14 20 3401:30 0 0 0 19 12 3101:45 1 5 3 3 4 8 14 64 6 56 20 12002:00 0 1 1 24 17 41 02:15 1 0 1 24 17 41 02:30 0 0 0 21 16 37 02:45 0 1 0 1 0 2 23 92 10 60 33 15203:00 0 0 0 12 13 25 03:15 0 0 0 13 7 20 03:30 0 0 0 12 10 22 03:45 0 0 0 9 46 11 41 20 8704:00 0 0 0 17 5 22 04:15 0 0 0 9 9 18 04:30 1 0 1 13 12 25 04:45 3 4 2 2 5 6 8 47 6 32 14 7905:00 3 2 5 7 7 14 05:15 0 0 0 17 14 31 05:30 0 2 2 21 18 39 05:45 2 5 1 5 3 10 7 52 9 48 16 10006:00 2 1 3 18 14 32 06:15 6 3 9 10 7 17 06:30 7 4 11 6 10 16 06:45 9 24 5 13 14 37 10 44 11 42 21 8607:00 10 10 20 13 11 24 07:15 4 11 15 11 10 21 07:30 10 13 23 14 7 21 07:45 10 34 6 40 16 74 10 48 16 44 26 9208:00 8 9 17 8 7 15 08:15 7 13 20 12 15 27 08:30 15 13 28 11 8 19 08:45 17 47 9 44 26 91 3 34 6 36 9 7009:00 24 21 45 14 9 23 09:15 12 12 24 6 4 10 09:30 24 15 39 1 3 4 09:45 15 75 9 57 24 132 7 28 7 23 14 5110:00 16 15 31 3 3 6 10:15 25 19 44 4 4 8 10:30 10 11 21 5 2 7 10:45 21 72 21 66 42 138 1 13 0 9 1 2211:00 15 16 31 4 3 7 11:15 19 13 32 3 2 5 11:30 10 10 20 3 1 4 11:45 7 51 15 54 22 105 2 12 2 8 4 20
TOTALS 324 292 616 540 443 983
SPLIT %52.6%47.4%38.5%54.9%45.1%61.5%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 864 735
AM Peak Hour 09:30 10:15 09:30 14:00 12:45 14:00
AM Pk Volume 80 67 138 92 64 152
Pk Hr Factor 0.800 0.798 0.784 0.958 0.800 0.927
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 81 84 165 0 0 99 80 179
7 - 9 Peak Hour 08:00 08:00 08:00 16:45 17:00 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 47 44 91 0 0 53 48 100
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.691 0.846 0.813 0.000 0.000 0.631 0.667 0.641
VOLUMEPrepared by National Data & Surveying Services
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
7/17/2021
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Saturday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Cerezo Dr Bet. Carlsbad Blvd & Los Robles Dr
21:3021:4522:00
Total
1,599
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total
1,599
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
ATTACHMENT C
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 8 of 34
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA21_040126_003
NB SB EB WB
0 0 908 702
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB00:00 3 3 6 18 18 36 00:15 1 0 1 23 19 4200:30 0 0 0 18 11 2900:45 0 4 1 4 1 8 23 82 21 69 44 15101:00 2 1 3 16 18 3401:15 1 2 3 15 9 2401:30 1 0 1 17 16 3301:45 0 4 0 3 0 7 28 76 12 55 40 13102:00 1 1 2 17 15 32 02:15 0 0 0 27 17 44 02:30 1 0 1 23 18 41 02:45 0 2 0 1 0 3 26 93 9 59 35 15203:00 0 0 0 18 12 30 03:15 1 0 1 26 13 39 03:30 0 0 0 23 10 33 03:45 0 1 0 0 1 20 87 11 46 31 13304:00 0 0 0 34 20 54 04:15 0 0 0 24 8 32 04:30 0 1 1 22 14 36 04:45 0 1 2 1 2 14 94 12 54 26 14805:00 0 1 1 19 10 29 05:15 0 0 0 21 13 34 05:30 0 2 2 13 6 19 05:45 2 2 1 4 3 6 13 66 9 38 22 10406:00 0 1 1 18 14 32 06:15 1 3 4 10 5 15 06:30 1 3 4 8 17 25 06:45 5 7 3 10 8 17 10 46 13 49 23 9507:00 3 4 7 10 10 20 07:15 6 5 11 12 9 21 07:30 4 5 9 9 4 13 07:45 13 26 6 20 19 46 14 45 14 37 28 8208:00 7 3 10 7 6 13 08:15 14 9 23 5 8 13 08:30 6 6 12 13 12 25 08:45 6 33 10 28 16 61 10 35 5 31 15 6609:00 3 9 12 6 3 9 09:15 5 9 14 8 10 18 09:30 17 12 29 3 4 7 09:45 8 33 6 36 14 69 1 18 0 17 1 3510:00 14 10 24 8 2 10 10:15 15 11 26 5 6 11 10:30 16 15 31 4 3 7 10:45 11 56 13 49 24 105 4 21 2 13 6 3411:00 17 20 37 6 4 10 11:15 14 14 28 2 6 8 11:30 22 14 36 0 0 0 11:45 15 68 16 64 31 132 1 9 3 13 4 22
TOTALS 236 221 457 672 481 1153
SPLIT %51.6%48.4%28.4%58.3%41.7%71.6%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 908 702
AM Peak Hour 11:30 11:30 11:30 15:15 12:00 13:45
AM Pk Volume 78 67 145 103 69 157
Pk Hr Factor 0.848 0.882 0.863 0.757 0.821 0.892
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 59 48 107 0 0 160 92 252
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 08:00 07:45 16:00 16:00 16:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 40 28 64 0 0 94 54 148
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.714 0.700 0.696 0.000 0.000 0.691 0.675 0.685
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,610
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesVOLUME
Cerezo Dr Bet. Carlsbad Blvd & Los Robles Dr
Sunday
7/18/2021
DAILY TOTALS Total
1,610
ATTACHMENT C
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 9 of 34
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA21_040091_007
NB SB EB WB
186 130 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB00:00 0 0 0 4 2 6 00:15 0 0 0 1 5 600:30 0 0 0 2 2 400:45 0 0 0 1 8 3 12 4 2001:00 0 0 0 1 3 401:15 0 0 0 3 2 501:30 0 1 1 2 3 501:45 1 1 0 1 1 2 6 12 1 9 7 2102:00 1 0 1 4 3 7 02:15 0 0 0 3 0 3 02:30 0 0 0 2 3 5 02:45 0 1 1 1 1 2 1 10 4 10 5 2003:00 0 0 0 5 4 9 03:15 0 0 0 2 0 2 03:30 0 0 0 3 0 3 03:45 0 0 0 2 12 3 7 5 1904:00 0 0 0 3 3 6 04:15 0 0 0 6 4 10 04:30 0 0 0 5 2 7 04:45 0 0 0 0 14 2 11 2 2505:00 0 0 0 9 1 10 05:15 0 0 0 7 2 9 05:30 0 2 2 7 3 10 05:45 1 1 2 4 3 5 11 34 2 8 13 4206:00 1 2 3 10 3 13 06:15 1 2 3 1 1 2 06:30 0 2 2 4 3 7 06:45 2 4 1 7 3 11 2 17 1 8 3 2507:00 1 2 3 3 0 3 07:15 1 3 4 1 2 3 07:30 3 1 4 4 1 5 07:45 3 8 4 10 7 18 2 10 1 4 3 1408:00 3 1 4 3 0 3 08:15 4 1 5 3 0 3 08:30 3 4 7 2 1 3 08:45 2 12 2 8 4 20 0 8 0 1 0 909:00 2 3 5 2 1 3 09:15 3 2 5 1 1 2 09:30 2 2 4 1 1 2 09:45 2 9 2 9 4 18 0 4 0 3 0 710:00 0 5 5 0 1 1 10:15 2 2 4 1 1 2 10:30 2 0 2 0 1 1 10:45 2 6 0 7 2 13 0 1 0 3 0 411:00 4 4 8 1 0 1 11:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 4 0 4 0 0 0 11:45 5 13 3 7 8 20 0 1 0 0 1
TOTALS 55 54 109 131 76 207
SPLIT %50.5%49.5%34.5%63.3%36.7%65.5%
NB SB EB WB
186 130 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:30 11:45 11:30 17:15 12:15 17:15
AM Pk Volume 14 12 24 35 13 45
Pk Hr Factor 0.700 0.600 0.750 0.795 0.650 0.865
7 - 9 Volume 20 18 0 0 38 48 19 0 0 67
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:45 17:00 16:00 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 13 10 0 0 23 34 11 0 0 42
Pk Hr Factor 0.813 0.625 0.000 0.000 0.821 0.773 0.688 0.000 0.000 0.808
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total
316
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
Los Robles Dr N/O Cerezo Dr
21:3021:4522:00
Total
316
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/25/2021
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by National Data & Surveying Services
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
ATTACHMENT B
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 10 of 34
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA21_040126_002
NB SB EB WB
245 177 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB00:00 0 0 0 10 2 12 00:15 0 0 0 6 5 1100:30 0 0 0 4 4 800:45 0 0 0 7 27 6 17 13 4401:00 0 0 0 10 5 1501:15 0 0 0 8 3 1101:30 0 0 0 8 4 1201:45 0 0 0 3 29 1 13 4 4202:00 0 0 0 6 1 7 02:15 0 1 1 2 1 3 02:30 0 0 0 4 5 9 02:45 0 0 1 0 1 6 18 2 9 8 2703:00 0 0 0 4 2 6 03:15 0 0 0 3 3 6 03:30 0 0 0 7 5 12 03:45 0 0 0 5 19 4 14 9 3304:00 0 0 0 4 3 7 04:15 0 0 0 5 2 7 04:30 0 0 0 2 3 5 04:45 0 0 0 4 15 0 8 4 2305:00 1 0 1 2 4 6 05:15 0 0 0 3 3 6 05:30 1 1 2 3 3 6 05:45 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 8 0 10 0 1806:00 0 1 1 3 4 7 06:15 1 4 5 3 1 4 06:30 1 1 2 1 5 6 06:45 2 4 1 7 3 11 1 8 2 12 3 2007:00 1 2 3 1 0 1 07:15 3 6 9 0 0 0 07:30 1 1 2 4 2 6 07:45 4 9 3 12 7 21 2 7 0 2 2 908:00 0 3 3 2 1 3 08:15 3 4 7 2 6 8 08:30 6 5 11 7 0 7 08:45 6 15 1 13 7 28 0 11 0 7 0 1809:00 7 8 15 1 1 2 09:15 6 1 7 2 3 5 09:30 5 4 9 0 0 0 09:45 10 28 2 15 12 43 0 3 1 5 1 810:00 5 3 8 1 0 1 10:15 5 2 7 1 1 2 10:30 5 3 8 2 1 3 10:45 0 15 4 12 4 27 1 5 0 2 1 711:00 1 5 6 0 1 1 11:15 9 3 12 1 1 2 11:30 5 3 8 1 1 2 11:45 5 20 3 14 8 34 0 2 0 3 0 5
TOTALS 93 75 168 152 102 254
SPLIT %55.4%44.6%39.8%59.8%40.2%60.2%
NB SB EB WB
245 177 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:15 08:15 09:00 12:45 12:15 12:45
AM Pk Volume 29 18 43 33 20 51
Pk Hr Factor 0.725 0.563 0.717 0.825 0.833 0.850
7 - 9 Volume 24 25 0 0 49 23 18 0 0 41
7 - 9 Peak Hour 08:00 07:45 07:45 16:00 16:30 16:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 15 15 0 0 28 15 10 0 0 23
Pk Hr Factor 0.625 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.636 0.750 0.625 0.000 0.000 0.821
VOLUMEPrepared by National Data & Surveying Services
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
7/17/2021
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Saturday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Los Robles Dr Bet. Cerezo Dr & Cannon Rd
21:3021:4522:00
Total
422
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total
422
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
ATTACHMENT C
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 11 of 34
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA21_040126_002
NB SB EB WB
278 161 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB00:00 0 1 1 2 1 3 00:15 0 0 0 5 2 700:30 0 0 0 4 7 1100:45 0 0 1 0 1 7 18 6 16 13 3401:00 2 0 2 3 2 501:15 0 0 0 5 2 701:30 0 0 0 7 5 1201:45 0 2 0 0 2 7 22 1 10 8 3202:00 0 0 0 3 7 10 02:15 0 0 0 12 4 16 02:30 1 1 2 14 3 17 02:45 0 1 0 1 0 2 15 44 6 20 21 6403:00 0 0 0 10 5 15 03:15 1 0 1 15 6 21 03:30 0 0 0 8 2 10 03:45 0 1 0 0 1 6 39 5 18 11 5704:00 0 0 0 5 3 8 04:15 0 0 0 14 4 18 04:30 0 0 0 4 3 7 04:45 0 0 0 6 29 1 11 7 4005:00 0 0 0 9 2 11 05:15 0 0 0 3 2 5 05:30 0 1 1 4 2 6 05:45 0 0 1 0 1 6 22 2 8 8 3006:00 0 0 0 4 2 6 06:15 0 0 0 2 4 6 06:30 0 1 1 4 5 9 06:45 2 2 0 1 2 3 3 13 2 13 5 2607:00 0 2 2 1 0 1 07:15 1 1 2 2 0 2 07:30 0 1 1 2 2 4 07:45 2 3 2 6 4 9 2 7 1 3 3 1008:00 1 1 2 4 0 4 08:15 2 1 3 4 1 5 08:30 2 2 4 1 2 3 08:45 1 6 1 5 2 11 0 9 1 4 1 1309:00 0 3 3 2 1 3 09:15 4 1 5 0 0 0 09:30 4 2 6 0 0 0 09:45 5 13 2 8 7 21 0 2 0 1 0 310:00 6 3 9 2 0 2 10:15 7 4 11 1 0 1 10:30 5 3 8 1 0 1 10:45 3 21 3 13 6 34 0 4 1 1 1 511:00 4 5 9 1 0 1 11:15 4 6 10 0 0 0 11:30 7 2 9 0 0 0 11:45 3 18 6 19 9 37 1 2 1 1 2 3
TOTALS 67 55 122 211 106 317
SPLIT %54.9%45.1%27.8%66.6%33.4%72.2%
NB SB EB WB
278 161 0 0
AM Peak Hour 09:45 11:00 11:00 14:30 14:00 14:30
AM Pk Volume 23 19 37 54 20 74
Pk Hr Factor 0.821 0.792 0.925 0.900 0.714 0.881
7 - 9 Volume 9 11 0 0 20 51 19 0 0 70
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:45 16:15 16:00 16:15
7 - 9 Pk Volume 7 6 0 0 13 33 11 0 0 43
Pk Hr Factor 0.875 0.750 0.000 0.000 0.813 0.589 0.688 0.000 0.000 0.597
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total
439
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesVOLUME
Los Robles Dr Bet. Cerezo Dr & Cannon Rd
Sunday
7/18/2021
DAILY TOTALS Total
439
ATTACHMENT C
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 12 of 34
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count
Location:Los Robles Dr & Cerezo Dr City:Carlsbad Project ID:Control:2-Way Stop (NB/SB)Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0NLNTNRNUSLSTSRSUELETEREUWLWTWRWU TOTAL7:00 AM 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 117:15 AM 0 0 3 0 0 1 3 0 1 3 2 2 2 4 0 0 217:30 AM 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 2 4 0 4 0 0 177:45 AM 3 2 1 0 0 1 4 0 1 7 0 2 0 5 0 0 268:00 AM 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 0 0 1 2 0 0 148:15 AM 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 118:30 AM 2 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 3 2 3 0 3 1 0 208:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 0 3 1 0 11
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTALTOTAL VOLUMES :10 8 7 0 2 5 12 0 9 25 7 16 3 24 3 0 131APPROACH %'s :40.00%32.00%28.00%0.00%10.53%26.32%63.16%0.00%15.79%43.86%12.28%28.07%10.00%80.00%10.00%0.00%PEAK HR :07:15 AM 38 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :5 6 6 0 0 2 9 0 4 16 4 8 3 15 0 0 78PEAK HR FACTOR :0.417 0.750 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.563 0.000 1.000 0.571 0.500 0.500 0.375 0.750 0.000 0.000
Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0NLNTNRNUSLSTSRSUELETEREUWLWTWRWU TOTAL4:00 PM 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 4 7 5 11 0 3 0 0 364:15 PM 0 2 3 0 1 1 3 0 5 3 0 3 0 2 0 0 234:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 5 0 3 1 1 2 0 164:45 PM 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 2 3 0 1 0 0 185:00 PM 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 7 8 9 0 5 0 0 415:15 PM 2 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 5 3 2 10 0 1 0 1 285:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 13 5 2 0 4 0 0 335:45 PM 2 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 10 7 2 1 0 1 0 0 29
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTALTOTAL VOLUMES :14 8 5 0 1 4 13 0 40 51 24 42 1 18 2 1 224APPROACH %'s :51.85%29.63%18.52%0.00%5.56%22.22%72.22%0.00%25.48%32.48%15.29%26.75%4.55%81.82%9.09%4.55%PEAK HR :05:00 PM 293 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :6 6 2 0 0 0 8 0 28 30 17 22 0 11 0 1 131PEAK HR FACTOR :0.750 0.500 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.667 0.000 0.700 0.577 0.531 0.550 0.000 0.550 0.000 0.250
21-040090-0035/25/2021
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
0.7990.700 0.667 0.782 0.600
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
0.750
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.708 0.550 0.800 0.750
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Totals
Los Robles Dr Los Robles Dr Cerezo Dr Cerezo Dr
ATTACHMENT B
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 13 of 34
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count
Location:Los Robles Dr & Cerezo Dr City:Carlsbad Project ID:Control:2-Way Stop (NB/SB)Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0NLNTNRNUSLSTSRSUELETEREUWLWTWRWU TOTAL7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:15 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTALTOTAL VOLUMES :1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4APPROACH %'s :33.33%66.67%0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%PEAK HR :07:15 AM 38 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3PEAK HR FACTOR :0.250 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0NLNTNRNUSLSTSRSUELETEREUWLWTWRWU TOTAL4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:15 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTALTOTAL VOLUMES :0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6APPROACH %'s :0.00%33.33%66.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%PEAK HR :05:00 PM 293 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
21-040090-0035/25/2021
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
0.2500.250
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
0.750
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.750
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Bikes
Los Robles Dr Los Robles Dr Cerezo Dr Cerezo Dr
ATTACHMENT B
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 14 of 34
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning
Movement CountLocation:Los Robles Dr & Cerezo Dr Project ID:
City:Carlsbad Date:
NS/EW Streets:
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 57:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 37:45 AM 1 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 6
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 28:15 AM 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 48:30 AM 1 4 5 1 0 0 0 1 128:45 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES :5 7 8 8 1 1 1 3 34
APPROACH %'s :41.67%58.33%50.00%50.00%50.00%50.00%25.00%75.00%
PEAK HR :07:15 AM 37 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 11
PEAK HR FACTOR :0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250 0.250
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL4:00 PM 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 44:15 PM 2 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 84:30 PM 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4
4:45 PM 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 45:00 PM 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 65:15 PM 0 1 1 3 0 2 0 1 85:30 PM 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 7
5:45 PM 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 4
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES :6 5 5 14 3 10 1 1 45APPROACH %'s :54.55%45.45%26.32%73.68%23.08%76.92%50.00%50.00%
PEAK HR :05:00 PM 290 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :0 3 5 10 0 6 0 1 25
PEAK HR FACTOR :0.375 0.625 0.500 0.750 0.250
21-040090-003
5/25/2021
0.7810.375 0.750 0.750 0.250
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
0.4580.500
PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
0.250 0.250 0.375
07:15 AM - 08:15 AM
AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Los Robles Dr Los Robles Dr Cerezo Dr Cerezo Dr
ATTACHMENT B
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 15 of 34
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID:21-040090-003 Day:
City:Carlsbad Date:
AM 9 2 0 0 AM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
PM 8 0 0 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 11 0 15
8 0 22 0 0 0 0 3
4 0 28 0 TEV 78 0 131 0 1 0 0
16 0 30 1 PHF 0.75 0.80
4 0 17 0 0 0 1 0
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 6 6 2 PM
NOON 0 0 0 0 NOON
AM 0 5 6 6 AM
0 NONE
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 34
Los Robles Dr & Cerezo Dr
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Los Robles Dr Tuesday
SOUTHBOUND 5/25/2021
4:00 PM - 06:00 PMPEAK HOURS07:15 AM - 08:15 AM 10 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM COUNT PERIODSNONE
33 0 22
Totals (AM)17 Total Bikes (AM)Cerezo Dr EASTBOUNDWESTBOUNDCerezo Dr 37 0 47 CONTROL
2-Way Stop (NB/SB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Totals (PM)Total Bikes (PM)
0
9
NORTHBOUND
Los Robles Dr
Totals (NOON)Total Bikes (NOON)
NOONAM PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
NOONPMAMNOONAMPMNOONAMPMNOONPMAM10 2
00 1
50 3100 100 1
60 130 100 10
0
00
0
1 0000000
0
00
0
0 0000000
0
00
0
0 0000210
11
017
30
28 8002660
0
00
0
0 0000000
15
34
16
4 920665ATTACHMENT B
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 16 of 34
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count
Location:Los Robles Dr & Cerezo DrCity:Carlsbad Project ID:Control:2-Way Stop(NB/SB)Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0NLNTNRNUSLSTSRSUELETEREUWLWTWRWU TOTAL7:00 AM 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 3 4 0 5 1 0 207:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 1 2 2 0 6 0 2 1 0 217:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 1 5 0 3 1 0 157:45 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 3 5 2 1 0 3 0 0 198:00 AM 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 4 3 2 0 4 0 0 198:15 AM 2 1 1 0 1 1 3 1 3 3 2 4 1 3 0 0 268:30 AM 5 2 0 0 1 1 3 0 5 8 3 1 0 8 1 0 388:45 AM 4 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 6 4 6 4 0 2 1 0 30
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTALTOTAL VOLUMES :15 4 2 0 5 5 20 2 21 31 20 27 1 30 5 0 188APPROACH %'s :71.43%19.05%9.52%0.00%15.63%15.63%62.50%6.25%21.21%31.31%20.20%27.27%2.78%83.33%13.89%0.00%PEAK HR :08:00 AM 41 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :13 3 1 0 3 3 10 1 15 19 14 11 1 17 2 0 113PEAK HR FACTOR :0.650 0.375 0.250 0.000 0.750 0.750 0.833 0.250 0.625 0.594 0.583 0.688 0.250 0.531 0.500 0.000
Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0NLNTNRNUSLSTSRSUELETEREUWLWTWRWU TOTAL11:00 AM 2 2 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 6 1 9 0 2 0 0 2711:15 AM 5 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 7 6 4 4 0 6 2 0 3911:30 AM 1 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 7 2 1 1 5 2 0 2511:45 AM 3 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 6 0 2 0 1 1 0 2012:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 7 5 2 2 0 4 1 0 2512:15 PM 3 0 1 0 0 1 3 1 4 6 3 7 0 1 0 0 3012:30 PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 11 2 3 0 4 0 1 2712:45 PM 4 3 0 0 0 2 4 0 4 5 2 3 0 6 1 0 34
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTALTOTAL VOLUMES :19 9 3 0 4 6 21 2 26 52 16 31 1 29 7 1 227APPROACH %'s :61.29%29.03%9.68%0.00%12.12%18.18%63.64%6.06%20.80%41.60%12.80%24.80%2.63%76.32%18.42%2.63%PEAK HR :12:00 PM 165 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :8 4 1 0 1 4 10 2 17 27 9 15 0 15 2 1 116PEAK HR FACTOR :0.500 0.333 0.250 0.000 0.250 0.500 0.625 0.500 0.607 0.614 0.750 0.536 0.000 0.625 0.500 0.250
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0NLNTNRNUSLSTSRSUELETEREUWLWTWRWU TOTAL4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 7 1 2 0 0 0 0 174:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 3 1 5 0 5 0 0 204:30 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 6 0 5 2 0 204:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 3 2 1 0 5 0 0 145:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 2 3 0 2 6 0 3 0 3 0 0 215:15 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 5 3 3 0 1 0 1 225:30 PM 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 7 2 9 0 5 0 0 335:45 PM 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 2 5 0 2 0 0 16
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES :6 4 0 0 4 3 14 2 20 34 13 34 0 26 2 1 163APPROACH %'s :60.00%40.00%0.00%0.00%17.39%13.04%60.87%8.70%19.80%33.66%12.87%33.66%0.00%89.66%6.90%3.45%PEAK HR :05:00 PM 293 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :5 2 0 0 2 2 11 0 10 21 7 20 0 11 0 1 92
PEAK HR FACTOR :0.625 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.500 0.250 0.688 0.000 0.625 0.750 0.583 0.556 0.000 0.550 0.000 0.250
21-040127-0027/17/2021
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
0.6970.583 0.625 0.659 0.600
12:00 PM - 01:00 PM
0.8530.464 0.708 0.850 0.643
08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
0.743
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
NOON NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.607 0.708 0.738 0.556
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Totals
Los Robles Dr Los Robles Dr Cerezo Dr Cerezo Dr
ATTACHMENT C
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 17 of 34
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning Movement Count
Location:Los Robles Dr & Cerezo DrCity:Carlsbad Project ID:Control:2-Way Stop(NB/SB)Date:
NS/EW Streets:
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0NLNTNRNUSLSTSRSUELETEREUWLWTWRWU TOTAL7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 3
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTALTOTAL VOLUMES :0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 5APPROACH %'s :0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%PEAK HR :08:00 AM 41 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 4PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000
Headers NBL NBT NBR NBU SBL SBT SBR SBU EBL EBT EBR EBU WBL WBT WBR WBU
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0NLNTNRNUSLSTSRSUELETEREUWLWTWRWU TOTAL11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 011:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 012:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 312:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 112:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 112:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTALTOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 6APPROACH %'s :0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%33.33%66.67%0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%PEAK HR :12:00 PM 165 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 6PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000
0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0NLNTNRNUSLSTSRSUELETEREUWLWTWRWU TOTAL4:00 PM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 74:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 14:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 PM 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NL NT NR NU SL ST SR SU EL ET ER EU WL WT WR WU TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES :1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 1 0 11APPROACH %'s :50.00%50.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%100.00%0.00%0.00%80.00%20.00%0.00%PEAK HR :05:00 PM 293 0 0 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
21-040127-0027/17/2021
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
0.3750.250 0.250 0.250
12:00 PM - 01:00 PM
0.5000.250 0.250 0.375 0.250
08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
0.333
PM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
NOON NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
0.250 0.250 0.250
AM NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
Data - Bikes
Los Robles Dr Los Robles Dr Cerezo Dr Cerezo Dr
ATTACHMENT C
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 18 of 34
National Data & Surveying ServicesIntersection Turning
Movement CountLocation:Los Robles Dr & Cerezo Dr Project ID:
City:Carlsbad Date:
NS/EW Streets:
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
7:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:15 AM 2 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 107:30 AM 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 77:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
8:00 AM 0 2 6 11 0 0 0 0 198:15 AM 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 78:30 AM 2 5 1 5 2 0 0 1 168:45 AM 1 3 0 2 1 1 0 0 8
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES :6 14 9 32 3 1 3 1 69
APPROACH %'s :30.00%70.00%21.95%78.05%75.00%25.00%75.00%25.00%
PEAK HR :08:00 AM 40 -1 -1 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :3 10 9 23 3 1 0 1 50
PEAK HR FACTOR :0.375 0.500 0.375 0.523 0.375 0.250 0.250
Headers NEB NWB SEB SWB ENS ESB WNB WSB
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 111:15 AM 0 2 5 4 0 0 1 1 1311:30 AM 2 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 10
11:45 AM 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 412:00 PM 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 312:15 PM 1 3 2 6 0 3 0 0 1512:30 PM 0 6 5 11 1 1 0 0 24
12:45 PM 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES :5 11 24 25 1 5 1 1 73APPROACH %'s :31.25%68.75%48.98%51.02%16.67%83.33%50.00%50.00%
PEAK HR :12:00 PM 163 -2 -2 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :3 9 9 19 1 4 0 0 45
PEAK HR FACTOR :0.375 0.375 0.450 0.432 0.250 0.333
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14:15 PM 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 44:30 PM 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 104:45 PM 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4
5:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 25:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 45:30 PM 2 2 2 1 3 5 10 0 255:45 PM 1 0 4 6 1 2 1 0 15
EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB TOTAL
TOTAL VOLUMES :13 6 8 9 4 10 12 3 65
APPROACH %'s :68.42%31.58%47.06%52.94%28.57%71.43%80.00%20.00%
PEAK HR :05:00 PM 290 -3 -3 TOTAL
PEAK HR VOL :3 4 8 7 4 7 11 2 46
PEAK HR FACTOR :0.375 0.500 0.500 0.292 0.333 0.350 0.275 0.250
21-040127-002
7/17/2021
0.4600.438 0.375 0.344 0.325
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
12:00 PM - 01:00 PM
0.4690.500 0.438 0.417
0.6580.464
PM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
NOON NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
0.471 0.500 0.250
08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
AM NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG
Data - Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Los Robles Dr Los Robles Dr Cerezo Dr Cerezo Dr
ATTACHMENT C
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 19 of 34
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
ID:21-040127-002 Day:
City:Carlsbad Date:
AM 10 3 3 1 AM
NOON 10 4 1 2 NOON
PM 11 2 2 0 PM
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
0 1 0 0 0 0 2 2
1 11 15 17
11 15 20 0 0 0 0 1
15 17 10 0 TEV 113 116 92 0 1 1 0
19 27 21 1 PHF 0.74 0.85 0.70
14 9 7 0 0 0 1 0
AM NOON PM PM NOON AM
PM 0 5 2 0 PM
NOON 0 8 4 1 NOON
AM 0 13 3 1 AM
25 11:00 AM - 01:00 PM
05:00 PM - 06:00 PM 12
Los Robles Dr & Cerezo Dr
Peak Hour Turning Movement Count
Los Robles Dr Saturday
SOUTHBOUND 7/17/2021
4:00 PM - 06:00 PMPEAK HOURS08:00 AM - 09:00 AM 21 7:00 AM - 09:00 AM COUNT PERIODS12:00 PM - 01:00 PM
24 30 23
Total (AM)9 Total Bikes (AM)Cerezo DrEASTBOUNDWESTBOUNDCerezo Dr51 48 47 CONTROL
2-Way Stop(NB/SB)
Pedestrians (Crosswalks)
Total (PM)Total Bikes (PM)
13
18
NORTHBOUND
Los Robles Dr
Total (NOON)Total Bikes (NOON)
NOONAM PM
PM
AM
AM
NOON
PM
PM
NOON
AM
AM
NOON
PM
NOON
NOONPMAMNOONAMPMNOONAMPMNOONPMAM201
1100
89971923413
7414910333
0
0
01
0
0 0100100
1
02
1
0 1001000
1
02
0
0 0000100
11
07
21
10 11220252
15
09
27
17 10411482
17
114
19
15 10331313ATTACHMENT C
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 20 of 34
California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Page 1 of 2
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates January 13, 2012
Part 2 – Signs
MULTI-WAY STOP CRITERIA
City of Carlsbad
CALC K. M DATE Aug 16, 2021
CHK J.C DATE Aug 16, 2021
Major St: Cerezo Drive Critical Approach Speed 21 mph
Minor St: Los Robles Drive Critical Approach Speed N/A mph
Critical speed of major street traffic > 40mph RURAL (R)
Otherwise URBAN (U)
The decision to install multiway stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered
in the engineering study for multiway stop sign installation:
Criteria A - Interim Traffic Control Measure SATISFIED YES NO
Where traffic control signals are justified, the MULTI-WAY STOP is an interim measure that can be
installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic
control signal.
Criteria B - Accident Experience SATISFIED YES NO
Five or more reported crashes within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a MULTI-
WAY STOP installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle
collisions.
Criteria C - Minimum Traffic Volumes SATISFIED YES NO
(All Parts C.1, C.2a and C.2b below must be satisfied)
C.1 Major Street Vehicular Volume Yes No
05/25/2021 Counts U R
5:00
pm
3:00
pm
7:00
pm
4:00
pm
1:00
pm
9:00
am
6:00
pm
2:00
pm Hour
Both Approaches
Major Street 300 210 129 116 103 98 92 89 85 74 Average= 98
07/17/2021 Counts
U R
2:00
pm
10:00
am
9:00
am
1:00
pm
11:00
am
12:00
pm
5:00
pm
7:00
pm Hour
Both Approaches
Major Street 300 210 152 138 132 120 105 104 100 92 Average= 118
C.2 a. Minor Street Vehicular, Pedestrian & Bicycle Volume Yes No
05/25/2021 Counts U R
5:00
pm
3:00
pm
7:00
pm
4:00
pm
1:00
pm
9:00
am
6:00
pm
2:00
pm Hour
Both Approaches
Minor Street 200 140 42 19 14 25 21 18 25 20 Average= 23
07/17/2021 Counts U R
2:00
pm
10:00
am
9:00
am
1:00
pm
11:00
am
12:00
pm
5:00
pm
7:00
pm Hour
Both Approaches
Minor Street 200 140 27 27 43 42 34 44 18 9 Average= 31
EXHIBIT 4
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 21 of 34
California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Page 2 of 2
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates January 13, 2012
Part 2 – Signs
b. Minor Street Vehicle Delay Yes No N/A
Peak
Hour
Peak Hour
Volume
Minimum Delay Requirement,
seconds per vehicle
Average Delay,
seconds per vehicle
N/A N/A 30 seconds N/A
Criteria D – Combination of Criteria SATISFIED YES NO
REQUIREMENT CRITERIA FULFILLED
THREE CRITERIA
SATISFIED 80%
B. Four or more reported crashes within a 12-month period. Yes No
C.1. Major Street Volume of at least 240 vehicles per hour Yes No
C.2. Minor Street Volume of at least 160 units per hour Yes No
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:
Option A – Left Turn Conflicts SATISFIED YES NO
The need to control left-turn conflicts;
Option B – Vehicle/Pedestrian Conflicts SATISFIED YES NO
The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes.
Option C – Sight Distance SATISFIED YES NO
Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate
the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
Option D – Residential Street SATISFIED YES NO
An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and
operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics
of the intersection.
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 22 of 34
California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Page 1 of 2
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates January 13, 2012
Part 2 – Signs
MULTI-WAY STOP CRITERIA
City of Carlsbad
CALC K. M DATE Aug 16, 2021
CHK J.C DATE Aug 16, 2021
Major St: El Arbol Drive Critical Approach Speed 24 mph
Minor St: Cerezo Drive Critical Approach Speed 23 mph
Critical speed of major street traffic > 40mph RURAL (R)
Otherwise URBAN (U)
The decision to install multiway stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered
in the engineering study for multiway stop sign installation:
Criteria A - Interim Traffic Control Measure SATISFIED YES NO
Where traffic control signals are justified, the MULTI-WAY STOP is an interim measure that can be
installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic
control signal.
Criteria B - Accident Experience SATISFIED YES NO
Five or more reported crashes within a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a MULTI-
WAY STOP installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle
collisions.
Criteria C - Minimum Traffic Volumes SATISFIED YES NO
(All Parts C.1, C.2a and C.2b below must be satisfied)
C.1 Major Street Vehicular Volume Yes No
05/25/2021 Counts
U
R
4:00
pm
5:00
pm
6:00
pm
8:00
am
3:00
pm
11:00
am
2:00
pm
1:00
pm Hour
Both Approaches
Major Street 300 210 58 48 48 39 36 34 34 33 Average= 41
07/18/2021 Counts
U
R
3:00
pm
2:00
pm
10:00
am
12:00
pm
4:00
pm
5:00
pm
1:00
pm
11:00
am Hour
Both Approaches
Major Street 300 210 57 53 49 45 45 42 41 33 Average= 46
C.2 a. Minor Street Vehicular, Pedestrian & Bicycle Volume Yes No
05/25/2021 Counts
U
R
4:00
pm
5:00
pm
6:00
pm
8:00
am
3:00
pm
11:00
am
2:00
pm
1:00
pm Hour
Both Approaches
Minor Street 200 140 59 91 48 24 67 32 50 92 Average= 58
07/18/2021 Counts
U
R
4:00
pm
5:00
pm
6:00
pm
8:00
am
3:00
pm
11:00
am
2:00
pm
1:00
pm Hour
Both Approaches
Minor Street 200 140 94 66 46 33 87 68 93 76 Average= 73
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 23 of 34
California MUTCD 2014 Edition
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Page 2 of 2
Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates January 13, 2012
Part 2 – Signs
b. Minor Street Vehicle Delay Yes No N/A
Peak
Hour
Peak Hour
Volume
Minimum Delay Requirement,
seconds per vehicle
Average Delay,
seconds per vehicle
N/A N/A 30 seconds N/A
Criteria D – Combination of Criteria SATISFIED YES NO
REQUIREMENT CRITERIA FULFILLED
THREE CRITERIA
SATISFIED 80%
B. Four or more reported crashes within a 12-month period.Yes No
C.1. Major Street Volume of at least 240 vehicles per hour Yes No
C.2. Minor Street Volume of at least 160 units per hour Yes No
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:
Option A – Left Turn Conflicts SATISFIED YES NO
The need to control left-turn conflicts;
Option B – Vehicle/Pedestrian Conflicts SATISFIED YES NO
The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes.
Option C – Sight Distance SATISFIED YES NO
Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate
the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
Option D – Residential Street SATISFIED YES NO
An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and
operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics
of the intersection.
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 24 of 34
Council Chambers
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Tuesday, Sept. 7, 2021, 4 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Gocan called the Meeting to order at 4:04 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Gocan, Perez, Penseyres, Linke and Coelho
Absent: Fowler
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice-Chair Perez led the Pledge of Allegiance
This meeting was conducted virtually via Zoom due to the stay-at-home order for COVID-19.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Motion by Vice-Chair Perez, seconded by Commissioner Penseyres to approve the minutes for the Aug.
2, 2021 meeting.
Motion carried: 4/0/1/1 (Abstained: Coelho; Absent: Fowler)
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA: None
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1.EL CAMINO REAL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS FROM SUNNY CREEK ROAD TO JACKSPAR DRIVE,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 6094 - Support staff’s recommendation to
implement the El Camino Real Roadway Improvements from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive,
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project No. 6094 (Project) providing operational improvements
consistent with the city’s General Plan Mobility Element.
This item was pulled for discussion by Vice-Chair Perez
2.SHARED LANE MARKINGS ON LEVANTE STREET FROM SEGOVIA WAY TO LA COSTA AVENUE- Support
staff’s recommendation to install shared lane markings on Levante Street from Segovia Way to La
Costa Avenue
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM 2:
David Levin - Members of the Traffic and Mobility Commission: Having shared lane markings and other
appropriate signage alerting drivers to share the road for the sake of all bicyclists’ safety on Levante
Street will be greatly appreciated by all bicyclists who navigate the narrowness of this street, especially
when parked cars and trucks are present. I am very appreciative that Council Member Teresa Acosta,
City Traffic Engineer John Kim, Associate Engineer Lindy Pham, and everyone on their teams who
conducted the study found that there is indeed a need to improve Levante Street for all bicyclists.
And I’m pleased that the Carlsbad Traffic and Mobility Commission will be hearing the
recommendation. However, I am a bit disappointed that the recommended starting point for the
EXHIBIT 5
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 25 of 34
sharrows and related signage will be only between Segovia Way and La Costa Avenue on Levante
Street. There needs to be more territory covered on Levante Street.
The width from one side of Levante Street to the other side, starting from Escenico Terrace to Segovia
Way appears to be similar to what the engineers are recommending for shared lane markings on
Levante Street from Segovia to La Costa Avenue, especially with parked vehicles.
In other words, the installation of sharrows and other appropriate signage should be expanded on
Levante Street from Escenico Terrace to La Costa Avenue—not just Segovia Way to La Costa
Avenue. That shortcoming would not lend itself to bicycle safety to all the areas needed on Levante
Street.
Without delay to deciding on the engineers’ recommendation, it is my hope that the Traffic and Mobility
Commission will request another look at an extended placement shared lane markings and other
appropriate signage from Escenico Terrace to La Costa.
Thank you very much.
DISCUSSION:
City Traffic Engineer Kim stated that it is not common practice for engineers to consider sharrows on
residential streets that are posted at 25 miles per hour. The speeds are low enough that sharrows are
typically not necessary. However, since a portion of Levante Street is defined as a school street per the
Mobility Element, staff has recommended the installation of sharrows upon the portion of Levante
Street that is defined as a school street. Staff is willing to hear the commission’s recommendation on
expanding the area of sharrow installation per Mr. Levin’s comment.
Commissioner Penseyres asked the distance referenced in the residents’ request.
City Traffic Engineer Kim said it is over 10 intersections and about 5,000 extra feet, and relatively flat.
Commissioner Linke is familiar with the street, acknowledges that this is just not a regular street, but a
thoroughfare, however he supports the staff’s recommendation and can consider other sections in the
future.
Vice-Chair Perez mentioned that the section going west has a bit of a slope and possible blind section,
but is in agreement with staff’s recommendation at this time to try it out.
Chair Gocan and commissioners agreed that the resident has a concern, yet they will try it out and they
will move forward.
ACTION:
Motion by Commissioner Linke, seconded by Commissioner Penseyres to approve Consent Calendar
Item 2 - Shared Lane Markings on Levante Street from Segovia Way to La Costa Avenue, as presented.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler)
Motion by Commissioner Linke, seconded by Vice-Chair Perez to approve Consent Calendar Item 1- El
Camino Real Roadway Improvements from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive, Capital Improvement
Program Project No. 6094, as presented.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler)
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS:
3. POLICE MONTHLY REPORT – (Staff Contact: Corporal Matt Bowen, Police Department)
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 26 of 34
Corporal Bowen presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office
of the City Clerk)
DISCUSSION:
Corporal Bowen pointed out that Carlsbad schools opened up on August 24, and the motors were at the
schools both morning and afternoons to help with any traffic issues and to keep the kids safe, in
addition to the crossing guards.
Corporal Bowen highlighted the purchase of an Electronic Message Board that is displayed on Carlsbad
Boulevard with the following message “Loud Exhaust Enforced Ahead”.
Commissioner Penseyres and Vice-Chair Perez are interested in hearing about the Know Your Limit
program related to driving under the in fluence at the next meeting.
4. ALL-WAY STOP ON CEREZO DRIVE AT LOS ROBLES DRIVE AND EL ARBOL DRIVE – (Staff Contact: Lindy
Pham and John Kim, Public Works)
Staff’s Recommendation: Support staff’s recommendation to install an all-way stop at Cerezo
Drive and Los Robles Drive.
Associate Engineer Pham presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the
Office of the City Clerk).
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM 4:
Jonnie Johnson - Thank you for work to resolve traffic problems in Terramar. It is much appreciated.
However, there are two issues that need further attention.
1. The most critical is the lack of red curbs/no parking signs on the western most portion of
Cerezo. The curbs are painted red on the southern side of the street between Carlsbad Blvd and
Los Robles, except for 2-3 parking spaces. The report states Cerezo is 36’ wide. It is, in some
portions. However, the street is tapered hence the western portion is narrower, approximately
33’ wide, leaving 16’ per lane. Per CA DOT, car widths are normally 6-8’ wide making
parking/driving tight. Cerezo is the primary entrance to Terramar. It is also a popular parking
spot for beachgoers. Surfers bring surfboards. adding another factor (one that is not addressed
in the current Residential Traffic Calming Program) to the traffic problem. They lay their boards
in the street reducing the passage even more. In addition, the owner of the house located on
southwest corner Cerezo/Carlsbad Blvd. has laid several large boulders on the easement,
causing pedestrians to walk in the street. (see attached photos.) This situation presents a
potential liability problem for the City if a pedestrian is hit, because of the boulders. The
intersection at Carlsbad Blvd/Cerezo has one pedestrian crosswalk located at the south side, so
it makes sense that westbound pedestrians on Cerezo be directed to the southern crosswalk on
the Blvd. Highly recommend the south side of the street between Carlsbad Blvd/Los Robles be
painted red.
2. Page 2, 2nd para. “Removal of on-street parking MAY not be supported by the Coastal
Commission…” This is ironic, since the next street over, Manzano, has NO parking on either side
and it is a blocked off from Carlsbad Blvd traffic.
DISCUSSION:
City Traffic Engineer Kim commented on the pedestrian concerns brought up by Ms. Johnson and
offered that a new sidewalk, which will be analyzed by the Transportation Department. The removal of
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 27 of 34
parking would create more space, but it may also lead to other concerns as people would simply park
further into the neighborhood. The removal of the parking spaces would create a wider street, which
may also increase vehicle speeds. Based on these considerations, the appropriate recommendation is to
install the all-way stop at Cerezo Drive and Las Robles Drive.
Chair Gocan asked and it was confirmed that staff will analyze the feasibility of a sidewalk in the future.
Commissioner Penseyres inquired about the location of the boulders in relation to the right of away.
City Traffic Engineer Kim said that they will look into it since they just received this comment over the
weekend.
Transportation Director Frank mentioned that similar to other streets, there are private encroachments
with landscaping, rocks, and boulders in the right of way. Staff has looked into this but have not reached
out to the involved property owners to discuss options.
Commissioner Penseyres asked about the speed survey, have we considered putting out rubber tubes to
catch the speeders when no one is there watching them. The concern is the maximum speed not the
critical speed.
City Traffic Engineer Kim replied that there is no accepted standard or practice that considers maximum
speed as a design factor and that critical speed is the appropriate measure. Maximum speeds are
captured since the speed measurement device records on a 24-hour per day basis.
Commissioner Linke asked about the no parking signs and the barricade on Manzano Drive.
City Traffic Engineer Kim will research the installation date as well as the justification for designating a
no parking zone.
Transportation Director Frank said that if staff decided to consider a sidewalk as a part of the sidewalk
improvement program, staff would hold workshops with the neighbors to explore different
opportunities.
Vice-Chair Perez inquired about the timing of the speed feedback sign deployment and a work-from-
home philosophy.
Associate Engineer Pham said that they did consider the lower volume of traffic during a pandemic. The
volume of the traffic was 118 and the minimum to qualify for consideration is 300 vehicles per hour per
the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Staff was confident that “normal” traffic levels would
not reach the minimum levels
City Traffic Engineer Kim mentioned that volume of traffic around the beaches has been fairly high
during the pandemic. Staff looked at the eight specific recommendations or guidance factors. The
location did not meet the criteria for vehicle volume, but it did meet the criteria for the
vehicle/pedestrian conflicts, which is why they are recommending the stop sign at that intersection.
Commissioner Penseyres inquired if there are any future projects that will be adding parking?
Transportation Engineering Manager Ajideh said that the Terramar project will improve Carlsbad
Boulevard including some parking improvements. The Terramar project is still in the environmental
review process and staff will bring it to the commission when it is appropriate.
Commissioner Linke likes the suggestion of looking at sidewalks and would appreciate a more global
picture of all the parking and safety issues. Motion by Commissioner Linke, seconded by Commissioner Penseyres to support staff’s recommendations to install All-Way STOP control on Cerezo Drive at Los Robles Drive and El Arbol Drive.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler)
5. VILLAGE AND BARRIO INTERSECTION CONTROL AT OAK AVENUE AND ROOSEVELT STREET- (Staff
Contact: Hossein Ajideh, Public Works)
Staff’s Recommendation: Support staff’s recommendation
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 28 of 34
Transportation Engineering Manager Ajideh presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint
presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM 5:
Xylina Lim - Buddha Teas has operated out of our current facilities on Tyler Street for close to ten years.
As a tea company, we receive large shipments of herbs and dried goods. While we encourage the efforts
of creating a safer area by controlling the flow of traffic, the proposed traffic circles inhibit larger
vehicles to enter our facilities. We will be one of many local businesses impacted by this change as we
have personally witnessed larger truck deliveries in the area that squeeze into smaller spaces than ours.
This feat alone takes a very skilled driver; the introduction of roundabouts will prevent trucks to have
any access to our facilities in the current proposed locations. As safety is at the forefront of our worries,
Buddha Teas would like to offer an alternative solution -- stop signs or speed bumps. We agree that the
driving speed observed is sometimes far beyond the speed limits. Stop signs will allow drivers to fully
stop and take in their surroundings for pedestrians and small creatures. In addition, speed bumps still
allow traffic movement, just at a more reasonable speed. In conclusion, the traffic circles would result in
a very detrimental loss for local businesses like ours. It is imperative for local businesses to receive
shipments at all, no matter the size.
DISCUSSION:
Commissioner Linke asked if corner bulb outs are an option for this location.
Transportation Engineering Manager Ajideh said that they did not introduce the bulb outs because they
heard the Boys and Girls Club concerns and they were trying to gain a few parking spaces. The four-way
stop is the safest condition for pedestrians.
Commissioner Penseyres asked if a scramble type crosswalk is possible?
Consultant Capuzzi said that he has not seen scrambles at all-way stops. They are typically used at traffic
signals.
Transportation Director Frank agreed that he has not seen a scramble at an all-way stop, it is probably
not a viable option.
Commissioner Coelho asked why we originally looked at a traffic circle at this location.
Transportation Engineering Manager Ajideh said that during the design stage, they noticed that there
were concerns for this specific intersection.
Deputy City Manager Gomez mentioned that during the Village and Barrio Master Plan development
there was a lot of public outreach. As the ideas came forward, they were presented and vetted. They
took the information included in the Village and Barrio Master Plan as a starting point and had the
consultants help them develop the plans and specifications. After speaking with the local businesses,
and particularly the Boys and Girls Club, there were some concerns and changes from what was
previously approved by City Council and had been presented to the Traffic and Mobility Commission.
Motion by Commissioner Coelho, seconded by Commissioner Linke to support staff’s recommendation
for alternative intersection control feature (no-project alternative with adding continental crosswalks) at
Oak Avenue and Roosevelt Street, which is part of the Village and Barrio Traffic Circles, Capital
Improvement Program Project, or CIP, No. 4015.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler)
6. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) PROGRAM AND TDM HANDBOOK – (Staff Contact: Tom Frank, Public Works) Staff’s Recommendation: Receive a presentation and provide input
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 29 of 34
Transportation Director/City Engineer Frank presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint
presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM 6:
1. Diane Nygaard - Honorable Chair and Commissioners: We were very disappointed after reading the
staff report for this agenda item. Our expectation was that a status report would actually report on
results. Understanding results is critical to determining what changes are needed in the program.
This report unfortunately does not discuss that.
What, if any, impact has this program had on increasing the mode share for alternative
transportation? How many businesses are participating? Have they completed baseline
surveys? How many have completed follow up surveys- and do they show any increase in mode
share for alternative transportation? What has been their experience with use of the actions from
the checklist and how does that inform decisions about modifying the TDM Ordinance/Handbook
for the next update?
We will separately forward to you and staff a discussion prepared by our attorney on the
inadequacies of the existing TDM program. We recognize the city's position is that they are in
compliance with the conditions of our settlement agreement related to the TDM program. But the
concerns raised in that letter are all relevant for your consideration of what needs to be improved if
this program is to achieve a meaningful reduction in GHG.
Today as we see the devastating impacts of climate change around our country and the world,
taking this issue seriously is imperative.
Thank you for providing important oversight and direction to staff.
2. Mike Bullock- We should all be serious about TDM, for 5 reasons:
1.) Cars are by far the category of GHG emission that emits the most GHG (CO2)
2.) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recently reported that humanity has a
“Code Red” climate emergency
3.) The IPCC says this because humanity is on a path to result in climate destabilization, which is
likely to end most life forms on Earth, including our own species
4.) There are two climate “targets”, or requirements, that must be achieved, to avoid climate
destabilization or, put another way, must be achieved to stabilize the earth’s climate at a livable
level
a. The 2nd requirement is to achieve net-zero emissions by 2045 or, if we are lucky, we
might be able to slip that out to 2050
b. The first requirement (which is the most important one, because if we fail to achieve the
first requirement, achieving the later requirement won’t save us) is to emit at a level
that is no more than 80% below what we emitted in 1990, by 2030, as part of an overall
world-wide plan to get our earth’s atmospheric CO2 to stop going up. (Note that
atmospheric CO2 is now around 420 PPM, but it should be around 280 PPM. 350 PPM
was deemed to be “dangerous” over 10 years ago.)
5.) The 2030 requirement can’t be achieved by only electrifying our fleet; we must reduce
driving. (I have done the math and verified this to be true.)
It seems to me that if Carlsbad were serious about TDM, then it would develop and implement a good
TDM program for their own employees, to show the employers in Carlsbad how it is done. Once the
Carlsbad TDM is “successful”, meaning that it is favored by most Carlsbad employees and it reduces
driving as predicted, other companies in Carlsbad could be required to adopt the same TDM.
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 30 of 34
Since we need big reductions by 2030, we must rely on pricing. Complete streets, better transit, and
better zoning need to happen ASAP, but their GHG reductions will not happen fast enough or be large
enough, given the 2030 requirement of emitting at no more than 80% below what was emitted in 1990.
We need systems to improve the way drivers pay for the use of roads and transit. The Road Use Charge
(RUC) is a state function. Carlsbad needs to ask California to implement a good RUC system in time to
help achieve the 2030 target. (ASAP!) Parking policy reform is for the municipalities. And Steve, you are
correct. TDM needs to be for all types of development.
I am a retired satellite system engineer. This is a systems-engineering problem. I have worked the
problem of identifying a set of enforceable measures to ensure that cars will achieve the 2030 target. It
has been presented multiple times, at Air and Waste Management Association (AWMA)
conferences. Each time the paper was presented, it was peer reviewed. The 2nd attached file is the
paper; the 3rd file is the power point file I use to present the paper.
DISCUSSION:
Chair Gocan is working with the school district, the city, and hopefully the community to make sure that
bikes have safe access through the intersections. Her personal goal is that 20% to 30% of the students,
especially high school student use walking or biking to go to school and create a safe place for drop off
and pick up of students.
Commissioner Linke would like to highlight four different regulatory pathways. Specifically, Mobility Plan
items 3P-8 to 3P-11. The items are:
1. TDM Ordinance and Handbook focusing on reducing employment related vehicle trips not only on
larger new businesses.
2. Having developers pay their fair share when they are adding traffic to the streets and congestion and
are failing to meet our GMP standard.
3. Our multi-modal level of service point system to achieve the minimum GMP standard to improve
nonvehicle modes of travel which he is on the ad hoc committee, because the standard is way too low.
He wants to include definitions of different TDM approaches to help the point system.
4. A state mandated environmental review of CEQA to reduce vehicle miles traveled. He is
recommending that these four regulatory pathways to be handled in the revision of the TDM Handbook.
Transportation Director Frank appreciates the timely comments and staff will be looking at what steps
are needed to update TDM to best serve our program goals.
Commissioner Linke gave examples and suggestions on how to update the TDM handbook, specifically
section 1.7 to include more than just the employees, to include all patrons of the business. In section 2.2
the thresholds of compliance, needs to address the trips that are added to exempt streets at a higher
standard. In section 2.5 the tier levels themselves and how they are applied from a Tier 1 to a Tier 2 or
Tier 3. The strategy needs to be beefed up to adequately address the trips to the site and determine if
the measures are working. He is suggesting that the survey be done every year for the first few years to
make sure they are properly monitored.
Commissioner Linke suggested that staff confirm that the TDM programs have been implemented and
the actual performance of those programs.
Consultant Hester agreed this is a really good comment and concern. The goal is to find out how many
people are participating in the program on the commercial side.
Transportation Director Frank said that on the residential projects we don’t have the same options or
tools to reinforce them. Staff will look into what options they have for residential projects based on all
the comments they receive. COVID-19 has made it difficult to complete the monitoring of the TDM
program.
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 31 of 34
Chair Gocan asked if it is ever going to be possible for the traffic and transportation engineers to review
the TDM applications.
Consultant Hester said that they will be looking at the process along with the content.
Transportation Director Frank said that the Community Development Team uses the handbook as a part
of their review. All of these examples are going to help improve this new TDM program. Commissioner
Linke mentioned that the City, when it updated the General Plan in 2014, discussed TDM.
Commissioner Linke would like staff to review the Innovative Feature category. Also review the
definition of how projects get the number of points they receive in every category.
Commissioner Coelho inquired about who has the lead in approving the TDM plans and the roles of the
different groups that participate in the process.
Deputy City Manager Gomez said that the Traffic and Mobility Commission does not review the TDM
Plans for private development projects. It is in the commission purview to look at and provide input on
how we can improve our processes and things that are related to traffic and mobility.
Transportation Director Frank said that he, as the City Engineer has the authority to make the changes.
Staff likes to work in a transparent manner to bring forward updates and receive suggestions like we are
doing tonight. Staff is currently providing Traffic Impact Analysis reviews for all projects, including
Community Development projects.
Chair Gocan mentioned that transportation options, like e-bikes, have changed a lot over the years. The
city is also seeing more traffic on the roads and the Traffic and Mobility Commission cannot address all
the associated tasks to reduce this traffic.
Transportation Director Frank agreed, and said it is getting more challenging with the state laws coming
out about higher densities. His challenges as the Transportation Director is to inform the policy makers,
the commission, the City Council, and the public of the coming issues and how we are going to address
it. The roads are congested, we cannot eliminate congestion, we can improve the efficiency of the road
network. Staff acknowledge that transportation behavioral changes are difficult because people like to
go from point A to B in a timely and convenient manner.
Commissioner Penseyres recommends that with the TDM program we could use a positive approach like
employers offering an easy access for bicyclist to a private shower with lockers and towel racks. The bike
parking should be close to the showers and lockers. We should be very specific about the amenities that
we provide for cycling to work. There are places in the TDM options that say should, when shall do this
to get the points, is more appropriate. When talking about bike racks it says if practicable then include
on your drawings. If it’s not practicable and they you are not going to do it, we need to make the
wording tougher so that they do it. We need to be a lot more specific on what a good faith effort gets
them before they can collect the points. Everything we do evolves around the automobile, like
rewarding an employee with a car and/or a premium parking spot. We have to do a paradigm shift and
we will need a lot of perks to change behavior. We need to provide very specific things in the TDM
program to encourage people to take another look at what else they can do. Finally, we need to place
more importance on education. For example, e-bike education helps the kids understand the rules of
the road to get to where they need to go, like to the beach with their surf boards, this saves the parents
time and car trips.
Vice-Chair Perez agreed that e-bikes are the new way we are going to be moving into the bicycle
industry, one of our transportation innovations. We should try to be innovative in the city and provide
some kind of charging. The e-bikes are heavy and might not fit in an office. The e-bikes might need a
charge to make the return trip home. Education and safety have to be a really crucial point in the
handbook, items like helmets and the importance of being seen by the cars. In the handbook when it
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 32 of 34
lists bike safety incentive the cost is medium, but the effectiveness is low. We need to place more
importance on providing helmet safety and being visible to the cars.
Chair Gocan mentioned the benefit of having e-bike chargers in the village as well as at the schools. To
make the bicycle riders, safe, comfortable, and provide a convenient place to charge.
Staff will consider all the suggestions to make the behavior change more rewarding.
7. ELECT A NEW TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR – (Staff Contact: John Kim, Public Works)
Staff’s Recommendation: Elect a new T&MC Chair and Vice-Chair
Motion by Commissioner Penseyres, seconded by Commissioner Coelho to nominate Commissioner Perez to one-year term as Chair and to nominate Commissioner Linke to 1-year term as Vice-Chair.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler) CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER REPORT: City Traffic Engineer Kim noted that staff had received comments regarding VMT from Commissioner Linke and would be bringing VMT as an agenda item in the near future. City Traffic Engineer Comments: Attachment A TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Motion by Commissioner Penseyres, seconded by Vice-chair Perez to put in the agenda for the next
meeting to return to 3 p.m. T&MC meetings for as long as it continues to be virtual meetings.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler)
Commissioner Penseyres inquired about the 2017 bicyclist crash in 2017 listed in the staff report near
Levante and Anillo Way. Staff will look at the location to evaluate the potential conflict point and if
needed, propose a potential solution.
Vice-Chair Perez gave a compliment to staff on the improvements at College Ave and El Camino Real, for
bicyclists, as a bicyclist at that intersection. He asked and will email staff about the new park at the
reservoir and the potential line of sight over the hill if that can be reviewed. He has received comments
from the neighborhood near Sage Creek High School about the new drop off location and the back-up it
is causing on the roadway.
Commissioner Linke gave several compliments to all aspects of the meeting, including the commission
and public comments. He inquired about the Vehicle Miles Traveled analysis guidelines change. It would
be nice for the commission to see the one major revision as listed in the report as a separate topic as
soon as possible. Consider treating the TDM guidelines as a living document in the same manner as the
Vehicle Miles Traveled analysis guidelines and consider making some changes immediately to improve
the situation while we are looking at updates to the TDM handbook.
Commissioner Coelho appreciates everyone’s efforts at this meeting and looks forward to working with
all of them.
Chair Gocan has been working with Sage Creek and the district about e-bikes. On Carlsbad Village Drive
at College Boulevard, the right turn is wide, the cars move over and the bikes are trying to get around.
She recommends staff to pay attention to that and also noticed parents are parking at the bus stop and
blocking the location for bikes.
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 33 of 34
Chair Gocan announced her resignation from the Traffic and Mobility Commission.
Transportation Director Frank thanked Chair Gocan for her service, her advocacy for school bike safety
that can continue into the future, and most importantly, Happy Birthday!
ADJOURNMENT:
Chair Gocan adjourned the Traffic and Mobility Commission Meeting on Sept. 7, 2021, at 7:35 p.m.
___________________________ Eliane Paiva, Minutes Clerk
Nov. 2, 2021 Item #6 Page 34 of 34
Stop Signs on Cerezo Drive
at Los Robles Drive
John Kim, City Traffic Engineer
Transportation Department
Nov. 2, 2021
{city of
Carlsbad
RECOMMENDED
ACTION
•Introduce ordinance to install stop signs on
Cerezo Drive at Los Robles Drive
2
{city of
Carlsbad
PROJECT LOCATION
3 Carlsbad Blvd.Cerezo Dr.Los Robles Dr.
Background
•36 feet wide with a single vehicle lane
and parking lane in each direction
•On-street parking allowed on both sides
•Rolled curb and gutter but no sidewalks
•Residential street with posted speed
limit of 25 mph
Item 6: Cerezo Dr and Los Robles Dr
4
{city of
Carlsbad
EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROL
Cerezo Dr.Carlsbad Blvd.Los Robles Dr.5
Traffic and Mobility
Commission
At its meeting on June 7, residents
presented concerns about pedestrian
safety on Cerezo Drive and a request for
stop signs
Item 6: Cerezo Dr and Los Robles Dr
6
{city of
Carlsbad
All-Way Stop Analysis
•Based on California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (CA MUTCD)
•Evaluates vehicular and pedestrian volumes as
well as other factors to determine if an all-way
stop is appropriate
Item 6: Cerezo Dr and Los Robles Dr
7
{city of
Carlsbad
All-Way Stop Analysis
Criteria to be Considered:
A.Interim Measure
B.Collision History
C.Volumes
D.Combination
Item 6: Cerezo Dr and Los Robles Dr
8
Not satisfied
Not satisfied
Not satisfied
Not satisfied
{city of
Carlsbad
All-Way Stop Analysis
Other Criteria to Considered:
A.Left Turn Conflicts
B.Vehicle/Pedestrian
Conflicts
C.Sight Distance
D.Traffic Operations
Item 6: Cerezo Dr and Los Robles Dr
9
Not satisfied
Satisfied
Satisfied
Not satisfied
{city of
Carlsbad
Traffic and Mobility
Commission
At its meeting on Sept. 7, the Traffic and
Mobility Commission supported staff’s
recommendation to install stop signs on
Cerezo Drive at Los Robles Drive with a
vote of 5/0/1
Item 6: Cerezo Dr and Los Robles Dr
10
{city of
Carlsbad
Item 6: Cerezo Dr and Los Robles Dr
RECOMMENDED ACTION
•Based on staff’s findings and upon the recommendation
of the Traffic and Mobility Commission, staff recommend
installation of stop signs on Cerezo Drive at Los Robles
Drive
11
{city of
Carlsbad
Item 6: Cerezo Dr and Los Robles Dr
QUESTIONS?
12
{city of
Carlsbad