HomeMy WebLinkAbout2360 SPRUCE ST; ; CB001948; PermitCity of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
09/12/2000 Residential Permit Permit No:CB001948
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address: 2360 SPRUCE ST CBAD
Permit Type: . RESDNTL Sub Type: SF0 Status: ISSUED
Parcel No: 1560522500 Lot #: 0 Applied: 05/22/2000
Valuation: $284,292.00 Construction Type: VN Entered By: RMA
Occupancy Group: 6 Reference #: Plan Approved: 09/12/2000
# Dwelling Units: I Structure Type: SFD . Issued: 09/12/2000
Bedrooms: 2 Bathrooms: 3.5 Inspect Area:
Project Title: WAYMAN RES-2963 SF+1610 GAR+ Orig PC#:
358 SF DECK,DEMO EXISTING 1204 SF RESIDENCE Plan Check#:
Applicant: Owner:.
SAM WRIGHT —WAYMAN TRUST-09-27-90 8464 09/12/00 0001 01 02
- C-PRMT 1587-56 1,1601WEATHERBYRD
Z LOS ALAMITOS CA 90720
/
Total Fees: $2,407.59 TotálPaymentsTo Date: $820.03 Balance Due: $1,587.56
/ \
V
Building Permit / $1,268 58 Meter, Size----,,, $0.00
/ \
Building Permit Fee—. / \$O:OO dd'lReclWàte Fee
Plan Check / / Add'l Plan Check Fee I $0.00 SbCWAFee '$0.00
Plan Check Discount $0.00\. CFD Payoff Fee $0.00
$0.00 Strong Motion Feet $2843 '\.,PFF; S.i( \ $O.oO I PEF (CFD Fund I
/1/1
$0.00 Park in Lieu Fee $000 \ ç $O.00 ' Liéns Tax ç Park Fee \ \$0.00Z Lidén Tax (CFD Fund) '$0.00 LFM Fee
$0.00 \, Traffiô Impact ee" I $0.00 Bridge Fee
\ $O:O07 trãfficimpact'(CFD Fund) / $0.00 Other Bridge Fee
BTD #2 Fee \$O.0b IFMZ TransportatioriFee / $0.00 INCCBTD#3 Fee $0.00 ./
$196.00 Renewal Fee -$000 UrABINGTOTAL
$0.00
/$0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAS'\ $20.00 Add'l Renewal Fee
Other Building Fee J $O.O091 r MECHANlCAL\TOTAL $70.00
Pot. Water Con. Fee
Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee N$0•00 u Mat& Drainage Fee
0.0O / C Housir Impact e ,//' $0.00
Meter Size / r Ho'usinllriLieFee - $0.00
$0.00
Red. Water Con. Fee $.00.Sewer Fee:_— $0.00
TOTALPERMIT FEES $2,407.59
FINAL APPROVAL
Inspector: Date: // Z/'t/ Clearance: &-%AA;i
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the'Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exacons of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
I FOR OFFICE USE O)(LY
IPLAN CHECK NO.(M2("ll/g
IEST. VAL.\Jj I Plan Ck. Deposit
Validated By M A—
Date
I
PERMIT APPLICATION -
CITY OF CARLS BAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008
Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) a 13 c c-
Legal Description Lot No. Subdivisio a Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units
Assessor's Parcel # 02 /115 4=1. 0S Z T - C) C> T n" 5 "1 _,!~ _01 Description of Work SQ. FT/ #orstefles— if of-Bedrooms f Bathrooms"
. i4,• r' r.
(4ifferent from a,pphcant) -- I *
Name Address I City State/Zip Telephone # Fax if
APPUCANT_O Ag T
cq-R Iz1 &-' k'5r,i 7
Name Address City State/Zip /') Telephone if
NanW I Address City J State/Zip Telephone if
L5cONLRcTPNVJL..___ TTT
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
(Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($50011.
/.e-cZ 2 - c'
Name Address City State/Zip Telephone if
State License if ' 7/ License Class /1 City Business License #
Designer Name Address ICit9 State/Zip Telephone
State License if
EER L
Wojkers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued.
I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Insurance Company "772_' lr'4'q Policy Expiration Date " a'f.- 4;
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1001 OR LESS)
CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California.
WARNING: Failure to secure workers' com9ensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ,000). tionWthe cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor coØ, interest and attorney's fees.
SIGNATURE DATE -
7.OWNERBUlLDERDECLAflATlON I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:
I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is -
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
I am exempt under Section _______________ Business and Professions Code for this reason:
I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES ONO
I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number):
I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone
number I contractors license number): -
I will provide some of the work, butI have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
of work):
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE
ITT .
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. -
8T'CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY ____ -. -
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code).
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS -
-- --. . -, - -- --..---------------r
I certify that I have read the application and State that the abov), information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construytl3th. I hereby authorize representatives of the Citc of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE T9ISftVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES,
JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY ' I Y WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for e3vatii345'0" p and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height.
EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by$iil4(O cial un r th provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work
authorized by such permit is not com n wj)11)n Odalef m the ate of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned
at any time after the work is comm a or 1
APPLICANVS SIGNATURE
1 ys (Se ion . 44 ifon Building Code).
- DATE ' Z2..
WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
City of Carlsbad
DEMOLITION PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
A demolition permit may only be issued to the owner of the property or
the State Licensed Contractor that is doing the work. The contractor.
must provide use with a letter, signed and dated by the property owner,
.giving permission for the building to be demolished.
The fee for a demolition permit is $30.00. The attached Demolition
Asbestos Certification application must be completed, signed and have
the correct square footage of the structure being demolished, as well as
it's use.
Er Applicant must provide a letter from San Diego Gas and Electric stating
that the utilities have been disconnected.
Arrange for appropriate Water Authority to remove water meter unless
construction of replacement structure is to begin shortly.
Cortact the Planning Department at (760) 438-1161 ext 4325 or ext flrf 4328 to determine if the structure is in the Redevelopment area, if it is
in the Coastal Zone, and if it is yn ;he list of Carlsbad Historic Sites.
2(0&kctAth~y(nTine&e~—CingaDeear/tge'nt at (760) 438-1161 ext 4315 or ext
4374 to determmine if .a Haul Route or Right-ofWay Permit is required.
12' Notify the Fire Department at (760) 931-2121 to see if they need the use
of the building for training purposes.
h:\word\forms\building\demolition permit requirements.doc REV May 7, 1998
2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, c 92009-1576.. (760)438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894
City of Carlsbad
DEMOLITION ASBESTOS CERTIFICATION
ADDRESS: 5Pe'ic. Jr
USE OF BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED:
SQUARE FEET X NUMBER OF STORIES
PROPERTY OWNER: rIL-ii /47' 1a49'4'4 t
ADDRESS: //'/ 446 A!'Z, PHONE5??j , 7è)
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS: 2 77c/ y' e4'th? PHONE
Section 19827.5 of California Health and Safety Code states in part:
"A demolition permit shall not be issued by any city ...as to any building or other
structure except upon receipt from the permit applicant of a copy of each written
asbestos notification regarding the building that has been required to be submitted to the
United States Environmental Protection Agency or to a designated state agency, or both,
pursuant to Part 61 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or the successor to
that part. The permit may be issued without the applicant, submitting a copy of the
written notification if the applicant declares that the notification is not applicable to the
scheduled demolition project."
--------------------------------------------------------------
As applicant for a demolition permit in the City of Carlsbad, I certify that; I have read
the excerpt from Section 19827.5 of the Health and Safety Code provided above; the
information I have provided on this form, is true and correct; and I further certify the
following:
( ) On the attached _______ pages are copies of all written asbestos notifications
regarding the above referenced building that are required to be submitted to the
United States Environmental Protection Agency or to Part 61 of Title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations, or successor to that part.
(V( I declare that the written asbestos notification is not applicable to the scheduled
demolition project.
?/
App icant's Signature Date
h:\word\forms\building\demolition permit requirements.doc REV May 7, 1998
2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 ED
Owner: WAYMAN TRUST 09-27-90
Remarks:
Total Time:
CD Description
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical
Associated PCRs
4
Requested By: RON
Entered By: ROBIN
Act Comments
j47
/...
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 11/07/2001
Permit# CB001948 Inspector Assignment: GG
Title: WAYMAN RES-2963 SF+1610 GAR+
Description: 358 SF DECK,DEMO EXISTING 1204 SF RESIDENCE
Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD
Job Address: 2360 SPRUCE ST
Suite: Lot 0
Location:
APPLICANT SAM WRIGHT
Phone: 7608013274
Inspector:
InsDection History
Date
07/30/2001
07/30/2001
05/30/2001
05/30/2001
05/30/2001
05/16/2001
05/14/2001
05/07/2001
05/03/2001
05/03/2001
04/04/2001
04/04/2001
04/04/2001
03/02/2001
12/08/2000
11/28/2000
Description
23 Gas/Test/Repairs
39 Final Electrical
17 Interior Lath/Drywall
18 Exterior Lath/Drywall
23 Gas/Test/Repairs
16 Insulation
84 Rough Combo
84 Rough Combo
13 Shear Panels/HD's
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
13 Shear Panels/HD's
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
15 Roof/Reroof
65 Retaining Walls
11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers
Act lflsp Comments
AP GG
AP GG TEMP POWER / PERM BASES
AP GG
AP GG
NR GG
AP GG
AP GG
NR GG
AP GG
WC GG
WC GG
AP GG DECK SHEAR OK TO COVER
AP GG
AP GG -
CO JL SEE NOTICE ATTACHED
AP JL GARAGES & STEPS
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad California 92008
INSPECTION RECORD
INSPECTION RECORD CARD WITH APPROVED PLANS
MUST BE KEPT ON THE JOB
'V.:..
:. CALL PRIOR TO 2:00 P.M. FOR NEXT WORK DAY INSPECTION
RI JILDING INSPECTION: (760) 602-2725
C8001 948 2360 SPRUCE ST C8AD WAYMAN RES-2983 SF+1610 ' JOB ADDRESS: 358 SF DECK DElAr LOT NO./SUITE:
RESDNTI IZXISTING 1204 SF RESIDEt OWNERS NAME: '- SFD
USE/OCCUPANCY
Lot#: SAM WRIGHT
. DATE
PERMIT NO. ..•. IRACFOR C C
B(tIDlNc
rTLJ'CO
APPROVED TO COVER
Type.of Inspection Date Inspe qor Notes
BUILDING
OUNDATtQN 'I"bo
RE,FORCED.STEEL
MASONRY
GRU.T 0 WALL DRAINS
TILT PANELS
POUR STRIPS.
________
• s1'eb cit.
COLUMNFOOTI•NGS . I
SUBFRAME 'DFLQOR 0 CEI.LING
ROOF SHEATHIN. •Id,
EXT. SHEAR PANELS '4
FRAME f•
INSULATION
EXTERIOR LATH
INTERIOR LATH &.DRYWALL
FINAL
PLUMBING
D SEWER AND BL/CO_,2Ji'iJCO
UNDERGROUND I3SVASTE 0 WATER - 0
TOP OUT WASTE 0 WATER
TUB AND SHOWER PAN
AS TEST DGAS PIPING
WATER HEATER 0 SOLAR WATER
FINAL
ELECTRICAL
O ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND 0 UFER
ROUGH ELECTRIC WALLS
ROUGH ELECTRIC CEILING
ELECTRIC SERVICE 0 TEMPORARY
BONDING 0 POOL •
(
FINAL
MECHANICAL
UNDERGROUND DUCTS & PIPING
O DUCT & PLEM.O REF. PIPING
HEAT - AIRCOND.SYSTEMS.
VENTILATING SYSTEMS
FINAL
CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHEN ALL APPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPROVED
FINAL Sign When Appropriate
Building Dept. (Inspections) (760) 602-2725
Fire Department (760) 6024660
Planning Department (760) 815-6708
Eng&.eering Dept. (Inspections) (760) 438-3891
Building Inspectors (7am-4pm) (760) 602-2700
CMWD (760) 438-2722 Ext 7151
REV 5/2000 SEE BACK FOR SPECIAL NOTES
• - . '. -
C,
A,
Cilyof Carlsbad
Final Building Inspection
Dept: Building Engineering Planning, MWD St Lite •Fire
Plan Check #: Date: 11/06/2001
Permit #: CB001948 Permit Type:' RESDNTL
Project Name: WAYMAN RES-2963 SF+1610 GAR+ Sub Type: SFD
358 SF DECK,DEMO EXISTING 1204 SF RESIDENCE
Address: 2360 SPRUCE ST Lot: 0
Contact Person: ROM Phone: 7608013274
Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA
Inspected Date
By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved:
Inspected Date
By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved:
Inspected Date
By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved:
Comments:
6f
0
City of Carlsbad
Final Building Inspection
Dept: BuiIdio n—own q-4anninq CMWD St Lite Fire
rn
-
NOV-5 200!
Plan Check #: Date: 11/06/2001
Permit #: CBOO 1948 Permit Type: RESDNTL
Project Name: WAYMAN RES-2963 SF+1610 GAR+ Sub Type: SF0
358 SF DECK,DEMO EXISTING 1204 SF RESIDENCE
Address: 2360 SPRUCE ST Lot: 0
Contact Person: ROM Phone: 7608013274
Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA
Inspected Date
By: / /1 5 Inspected: /// /'/ Approved: Disapproved:
Inspected Date
By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved:
Inspected Date
By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved:
SUI II liii IlillU IISSUIU ISIS U SIIIUIIUUUSIUU US US IS 555555555 ...............III ............S .........III•uIS ISIS ISIflISSIS 1101111•SI .........................III
Comments:
-
JOB 0007 2Wof MAN Awes,
SMEETNO. ____________________________ OF P
SOUTH COAST _______________
STRUCTURAL DESIGN
CALCULATED BY_______________ DATE__________
CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
1.
U
jljjj ESS/ON
ru Lu No- 4352 I
*$1$i ti'Og
h !.T, 50T. PLATE
V AML PIN PLAN I
II WL Gawm
q
q&I'/'o4. øPc1! $Lia
,O-M PL
I •
TCP I aw. 4
CU&POOTING
OCT. 27. 2000 11:19AM CIE ESCONDIDO NO. 2062 P-2/2
CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
OEOTICUNICAL AN 1) CONSTRUCTION ENGINEIRING lEST IN3 AND INSPECTION 2414 VINEYARD AV1NIJE. SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA. 9229 760l 746.4955 ENGINEERINGNC
-
DAILY FIELD REPORT
FClient-. J-i •f . Ijob Number: V400
- Job: Name:
Day(s): Job Location: z. -Ai./ Date(s): '' / 7/co Gen. Contractor:
Sub Contractor(s):
- -
General Description:
J% 'J 1lt') 7(1 4+1 ,.(ftbl. £L+ (-:j.t-,.1.frJ _
(1/ . fp•ji r''
) c jSi>(3.c. tl.> tLkL*,k; ML t1.
4p.UtL •!\ Ai lAV%(d (r A 4&
J4,J (dt&:& i'pis- cf' P-M f I it-
(.(f_!1d l)
4jj ç.jz( /-y g.ei.t - •-Ii,t
3ib..AL1 1;-. (kp
COMMNTS/ AREAS OF ADDITIONAL CONCERN
__ _____-
i
GEOTECHNICAL & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEE--RINQ TESTINU & INSFhLI 1Q
24t4 VINEYARD AVENUE SUIT! 0 ESCONDIDO.CA. 92029 (760) 746-4955 FAX (760) 746-9806
1645 PACIFIC AVENUE SUIT 105 OXNARD, CA 93033 (805)486.6475 FAX 805) 486-9016
4
William E. Billings
Licensed Surveyor
P.O. Box 4231, Carlsbad, California 92018-4231
(760) 434-6442
November 7, 2000
City of Carlsbad
Building Dept.
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Subject: Building Setback Certification
Site Address: 2360 Spruce Street
APN: 156-052-25
Legal: Parcel 1, PM979
Builder: Severino Construction
Plan Check No.: CBOO_1948, approved Sept. 12, 2000
On November 71 2000 1 checked the foundation forms
at 2360 Spruce Street for setback compliance. I found
the four corners of the parcel as shown on Parcel Map
No. 979. I certify that the forns meet or exceed the
minimum setbacks shown on the plans.
The setbacks as measured are:
Location Measured Minimum Required
Front, West yard 27.0' 20.0'
Side, South yard 10.0' 96"
Rear, East yard 19.0' 1.9.0' Side, North yard 14.01 916"
William E. Billings, L. . No. 3338
Carsbad CBOO- 1948
06106/00
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Z3s
PLAN CHECK NUMBER 00 .ti4P OWNER'S NAME: ________________
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector),
certify that 1, or the architecj1ngineer.of record, will be responsible for employing the special
inspector(s) as required W,)fiifmBjaiilding Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction
project located1t the sjt'e,1i1aboy. UBC Section 106.3.5.
Signed
E4 ii. t4p4c.-r
I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special
inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at
the site listed above. Eiee,SIArthftes Seal & Signature Here
Signed
1. List of work requiring special inspection:
Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection 0 Field Welding
D Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI 0 High Strength Bolting
0 Prestressed Concrete El Expansion/Epoxy Anchors
O Structural Masonry El Sprayed-On Fireproofing
El Designer Specified 0 Other
2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed
above:
C 1c-t%1 P.,i4c-
ô43 t•4jglblfl4 — C - . 74-c 4s
3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:
c LS Ca cai.4 r 'IA4c.-€ t- .— -r I2&1111O v.4 ICpc.T
C.
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building Safety
DATE: 08/17/00 Q ANT
:Mw
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad 0 PLAN REVIEWER
0 FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: CBOO-1948 SET: III
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2360 Spruce Street
PROJECT NAME: Wayman SFD
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
LI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
LI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
LI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
U Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Telephone #:
Date contacted: (by: )
ne Fax in Person 47LI .. 2
'KS:roject engineer of record t o4iamp and sign sheetS8 in to the drawing
By: Kai Tumalieh Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
0 GA J MB 0 EJ 3 Pc 08/08/00 tmsmtt.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building Safety
DATE: 07/26/00 C3 APPLICANT
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER
U FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: CBOO-1948 SET: II
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2360 Spruce Street
PROJECT NAME: Wayman SFD
LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Sam Wright
1287 Buena Vista Way, Carlsbad, CA 92008
LII Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Sam Wright Telephone #: (760) 213-1460
Date contacted:l-Z.u'-' (by:h'-) Fax #: (1o) 72a— lê
Mail Telephone Fax .- In Person
LII REMARKS:
By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
[:1 GA El MB flEJ [:1 PC 07/20/00 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad CBOO-1948
07/26100
NOTE: The item numbers listed below refer to the numbers from the previous list.
These items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold at the end of
each item are to emphasize the remaining problem.
Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list.
Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for
residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in
one of two ways:
Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-
2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver
all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad
Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed
by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil
Corporation is complete.
All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their
preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Please stamp and
sign all sheets.
On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in
a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2.
REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also
require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building
Code.
ITEM
FIELD WELDING. Please include field welding
3. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall
prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for
approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5.
Please complete the attached form. The requested information was not
received.
Carlsbad CBOO-1948
07/26/00
4. Provide a guardrail detail and cross reference to plans perUBC (Section 509.1).
At deck. Show the following:
Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings
formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be
less than 6".
Revise detail (5/13I).
Show decks drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3.
All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns
supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage
side. Section 302.2. Drop beams and steel tube columns.
Show anchored veneer support and connections attached to wood in Seismic
Zones 3 and 4, comply with Section 1403. Show ties, #9 wire in horizontal joints,
etc. Show ties size and spacing.
STRUCTURAL
Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents. Revise detail (51S-4). Revise
foundation depth per foundation review letter.
Provide a complete Manufacturer roof truss drawings. Package shall include the
following
Truss layout plan. Clarify roof trusses reference. References shown on
plans do not agree with references shown on roof truss package.
Required roof truss hangers.
CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:
Wood shakes and shingles are prohibited as a roof covering on all new structures and
on all replacement roofs. No response was received for this correction. The
original correction still applicable.
New corrections based on revised plans:
1. Specify on plans what shear wall type (A )stands for at second floor grid line 3.
Carlsbad CBOO-1948
07/26/00
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting. from this correction list? Please
indicate:
Yes El No L3
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/56O1468, to
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carlsbad CBOO-1948
07/26/00
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME:
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector),
certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special
inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction
project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5.
Signed
I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special
inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at
the site listed above.
Enginee?slArthlles Seal
& Signature Here
Signed
1. List of work requiring special inspection:
0 Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection 0 Field Welding
fl Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI 0 High Strength Bolting
O Prestressed Concrete 0 Expansion/Epoxy Anchors
O Structural Masonry 0 Sprayed-On Fireproofing
0 Designer Specified 0 Other
2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed
above:
3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:
Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site.
4?.
IF EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building Safety
DATE: 06/06/00 L3 APPLICANT
JURIS.
JURISDICTION: Carsbad U REVIEWER
U FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: CBOO-1948 SET: I
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2360 Spruce Street
PROJECT NAME: SFD
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
El The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Sam Wright
1287 Buena Vista Way, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Sam Wright (V, IA.) Telephone #: (760) 213-1460
Date . 6-1 0 (by:u4 Fax #:
Maik.' Telephone w Fax In Person
LII REMARKS:
By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
fl GA D MB El EJ El PC 05/25/00 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
Carsbad CBOO-1948
06/06/00
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: CBOO-1948 JURISDICTION: Carsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2360 Spruce Street
FLOOR AREA: 2963 (R-3)
1610 (Garage & Workshop)
Deck 358
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION:
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED: 06/06/00
STORIES: Two
HEIGHT: 30 Ft (App. per UBC)
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 05/25/00
PLAN REVIEWER: Kal Tumalieh
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire
Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of
the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC,
1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99).
The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted
by ordinance.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., elan sheet number, specification section. etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
Carsbad CBOO-1948
06/06/00
Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list.
Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for
residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in
one of two ways:
a) Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-
2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
b) Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver
all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad
Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed
by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil
Corporation is complete.
All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their
preparation. (California Business and Professions Code).
On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in
a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2.
REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require
Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the.Uniform Building Code.
ITEM
SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO
FOUNDATION INSPECTION
FIELD WELDING
When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall
prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for
approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section
106.3.5. Please complete the attached form.
Provide a guardrail detail and cross reference to plans per UBC (Section 509.1).
At deck. Show the following:
A height of 36".
Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal
force prescribed in Table 16-B.
Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings
formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall
be less than 6".
Carsbad CBOO-1948
06/06/00
5. Provide a handrail detail at interior and exterior stairs (Section 1003.3.3.6):
a) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches
nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting
from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the
handrail.
6. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3.
a) Rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum.
7. Provide section through the exterior stairs.
8. The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be
protected on the enclosed side as required for one hour fire-resistive
construction. Section 1003.3.3.9.
9. Provide skylight details to show compliance with Sections 2409 and 2603, or
specify on the plans the following information for the skylight(s), per Section
106.3.3:
Manufacturer's name.
Model name/number.
ICBO approval number, or equal.
10. Where eave vents are installed, insulation shall not block the free flow of air. A
minimum of 1" of air space shall be provided between the insulation and the roof
sheathing. To accommodate the thickness of insulation plus the required 1"
clearance, member sizes may have to be increased for rafter-ceiling joists.
Section 1505.3.
11. All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns
supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage
side. Section 302.2. Drop beams.
12. Show anchored veneer support and connections attached to wood in Seismic
Zones 3 and 4, comply with Section 1403. Show ties, #9 wire in horizontal joints,
etc.
. MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE)
13. Show an access opening to the equipment in attics to large enough to remove
the largest piece of equipment by not less that 30" x 22". UMC 307.3.1.
Carsbad CBOO-1948
06/06/00
STRUCTURAL
14. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations.
Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building
Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building
official in writing that:
The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
15. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan,
grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been
determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly
incorporated into the construction documents.
16. Provide a complete Manufacturer roof truss drawings. Package shall include the
following
Truss layout plan.
Required roof truss hangers.
17. Project engineer of record to review and stamp trusses layout plan (or provide a
letter) manufacturer roof truss drawings.
18. Fill all details bubbles. See sheet S-3.
19. Show location of floor headers FHA, FH-2, FH-3 and FH-5 on plans.
20. Provide beam to beam connection. Please specify required hangers. For
example connection of floor FB 6 and F137.
In Seismic Zone 4, aspect ratios are limited to 2:1 for wood shear panels. Table 23-11-
G. Check height to width ratio for all shear walls. For example second floor
shear walls along grid lines 5 and C.
CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:
Wood shakes and shingles are-prohibited as roof covering on all new structures and
on all replacement roofs.
Carsbad CBOO-1948
06/06/00
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate:
Yes No L3
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468,10
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carsbad CBOO-1948
06/06/00
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Carsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: CBOO-1948
PREPARED BY: Kal Tuinalieh DATE: 06/06/00
BUILDING ADDRESS: 2360 Spruce Street
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
BUILDING
PORTION
BUILDING AREA
(Sq. Ft.) VALUATION
MULTIPLIER
VALUE ($)
Dwelling 2963 82.00 242,966
Garage 1610 23.00 37,030
Deck 358 12.00 4,296
Air Conditioning 2963 3.00 8,889
Fire Sprinklers
TOTAL VALUE 293,181
1300
El 199 UBC Building Permit Fee Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 1300.07
El 199 UBC Plan Check Fee Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 845.04
Type of Review: Complete Review El Structural Only El Hourly
El Repetitive Fee Applicable El Other:
Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 676.03
Comments:
Sheet I of I
macvalue.doc 5100
I
Citv
_
of Carls
Public .Wbiks Engineering
?.W • '
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
DATE: 1IIS100 PLANCHECKNO.:
BUILDING ADDRESS: _____ ru __
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ciro &
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: I b
CBUD/94
-
EST. VALUE:
DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING
APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has been
approved. The approval is based on plans,
information and/or specifications piovided in your
submittal; therefore any changes to these items after
this date, including field modifications, must be
reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes. Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit.to build.
EA Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements:
DENIAL
PleaseO
icabon
attached report of deficiencies
marked ke necessary corrections to plans
or spedfor compliance with applicable
codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or
specifications to this office for review.
By:4421 Date:
By: Date:
By: Date:
USE
AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT:
By: /'— / ' Date:
ATTACHMENTS ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
0 Dedication Application
Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER.
O Dedication Checklist . . .
City of Carlsbad
.
O Improvement Application . . Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue
O Improvement Checklist Phone: (760) 602-2741
0 Future Improvement. Agreement
. CFD INFORMATION
0 Grading Permit Application Parcel Map No:
El Grading Submittal Checklist Lots:
O Right-of-Way Permit Application Recordation:
E] Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract:
and Information Sheet
.0 Sewer Fee Information Sheet
PfceL
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760)602-8562
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN
ST 3RDI
Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drayto scale. Show:
kih Arrow 'VP .Eoperty Lines
B- xispg & Proposed Structures 'EEasements
Cfixiing Street Improvements i..F Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets
Driveway widths -fiOLe- 1.-
Show on site plan: le 3' O-'- 4jt0 ?'i' kt.si.gi
A. Drainage Patterns
Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building.":
B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography
3. Include on title sheet:
Site address
Assessor's Parcel Number
Legal Description . . . .
.
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include:
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER . DESCRIPTION
DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for
Project. No.
0 0 0 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date:
H\WORDWARMERKATMASTERSBUIId Ptanthedi Cdst SP000I Fan,, KF.doc 2 Rev. 9I397
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
drain or utility easements onthe building site is required for all new buildings and
for remodels with a value at or exceeding $_, pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
r
ç(
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 /? x 11" plat map
and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and
signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an:
application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the
completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the
Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication completed by: Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
0 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be
/ constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the
construction exceeds $ . , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code.
Section 18.40.040. .
Public improvements required as follows:
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
checklist must, be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improvement Plans signed by: . ' Date:
0 0 0 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad.
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or
current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $________________
so
we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a
Building permit.
Future public improvements required as follows: .
H:WORDFARMERKAHYMASERSBUildklO Plandeck 0,1st BP000I Fonn KF4Cc 3 . ,
• 9397
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
V
1st/ 2ndl 3rdl
U., 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Future Improvement Agreement completed by:
Date:
U U. 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective
improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction
of the City Inspector prior to" occupancy.
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
11.06.030 of the Municipal Code.
U 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make determination on grading
requirements. lncIuatejrading quantities (cut, fill import, export). -
U U 7b. Grading Permit required. A se grading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached. NOTE: • The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
Grading Inspector sign off by: • • Date:
U U • 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
if a grading-permit is not required.) • .
U U U 7d. No Grading Permit required.
U 0 0 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS . • • .
0 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in. City Right-of-Way and/or
private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are
not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
HWORDPARMERKAThAASTERS'BU1In9 Planthedi cidat 13P000I Form KP.doc 4 - Rev. 913191
4
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
7';.
2 3rd"
ci 0 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The
fee is noted in the fees section on the following page
ci ci 0 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your Jacility is located in
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
C
a
r
l
s
b
a
d
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipa
l
W
a
t
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
,
located at 5950 El Carnino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008.: Distric
t
p
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
c
a
n
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your busine
s
s
e
n
t
e
r
p
r
i
s
e
i
s
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, ex
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
1
5
3
,
f
o
r
assistance. •
Industrial Waste perñiit accepted by:
Date:
0 0 • 11.NPDES PERMIT
Complies with the City's . requirements of' the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant, shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an accepta
b
l
e
l
e
v
e
l
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall b
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building perm
i
t
,
w
h
i
c
h
e
v
e
r
occurs first. . •
ci • 0 • 12. , bired fees are attached
fees required . • . •
•
ci ci U. . 13. Local Facilities Management Zone Transportation Fee Agm
t
S
i
g
n
e
d
.
0 0 • 0 14. Additional Comments: • • •
H:WORDFARMERAMASTERS\BLiIc Planthedc clil,t BP000I Form KF.doC 5 .
•
Rev. 913197
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
\ Plan Check No. CB 0011 L4 Address 'oV 6?P.U6L. '/t
\\ Planner 'b Phone t *i, extension
APN:
Type of Project & Use:U &iA] #/ Ff Net Project Density: DU/AC
Zoning: General Plan; QL M Facilities Management Zone: I
'.. X CFD fin/ntit # Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:______ Circle One
(For non-residential development: Type of land used created by
this permit:)
Legend: Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action
0 Environmental Review Required: YES NO, TYPE
DATE OF-COMPLETION:
Compliance with conditirns of approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
0 0 Discretionary Action Required: YES NO / TYPE
I' APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE
PROJECT NO.
OTHER RELATED CASES:
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:__________________________________________________
Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES____ NO____
CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES.• NO____ If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036
Determine 'statUs (Coastal Permit Required-or Exempt):
Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO____ If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now.
Coastal Permit Determination Log #:
Follow-Up Actions:
Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum
Floor Plans).
Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed.
fl. 0 Inclusiônary Housing Fee required: YES NO
(Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance -. May 21, 1993.1
Data Entry Completed? YES NO
(AIPIDs. Activity Maintenance, enter CB#. toolbar. Screens Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN. Enter Fee, UPDATE!)
I Site Plan:
0 fl 1. Provide a fully dimensional, site plafl drawn to scale Show: North arrow,
property lines, easements; existing and proposed structures, streets, existing
street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing
topographical lines.
0 0 0 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
Zoning:
El D 1. Setbacks:
Front:
Interior Side:
Street Side:"
Rear:
Required
Required
Required
Required•. 1Y' 9Y1
1
tll
Shown 2u
Shown l'21
Shown _______
Shown
LI 0 0 2. Accessory structure setbacks:
Front: 4 Required
Interior Side: Required
Street Side: Required
Rear: Required
Structure separation: Required
Shown
Shown
Shown
Shown
Shown
0 0 3. Lot Coverage: •.Required 4Q0'c Shown _2.
LI 4. Height: Required Shown C
______ O 5. Parking: Spaces Required 20Y '2-0 Shown 2 Z-3
Guest Spaces Required Shown
0 LI fl Additional Comments________________________________________________________
OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER ~~TE
I CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
I 4 SAN DIEGO, CA • RIVERSIDE, CA ' VENTURA, CA • TRACY, CA • LANCASTER, CA
Q 2414 Vineyard Ave. 490 E. Princeland Ct. 1645 Pacific Ave. 242W. Larch 42156 10th St. W.
Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105 Suite F Unit K
Escondido, CA 92029 Corona, CA 91719 Oxnard, CA 93033 Tracy, CA 95376 Lancaster, CA 93534
(760) 746.4955 (909) 371.1890 (661) 486.6475 (209) 839-2890 (661) 726-9676 ENGINEERING, INC. (760)746-9806 FAX (909) 371.2168 FAX (661)486-9016 FAX (209) 839.2895 FAX (661) 726.9676 FAX
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
I PROPOSED WAYMAN RESIDENCE
. 2360 SPRUCE STEET
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA .
I
I .
.. .
Prepared for:
I .
MR. SAMUEL WRIGHT
WRIGHT DESIGN
. 1287 BUENA VISTA WAY
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
I . Prepared by:
I CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
2414 VINEYARD AVENUE, SUITE G
ESCONDIDO, CA 92029
CTE JOB NO. 10-4009 . . APRIL 24, 2000
I
\proje10.4009GRT_Geotcthnicai nvuganon.doc
GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
TRACY, CA • LANCASTER, CA
242W. Larch 42156 10th St. W.
Suite F Unit K
Tracy, CA 95376 Lancaster, CA 93534
(209) 839.2890 (661)726-9676
(209) 839-2895 FAX (661) 726-9676 FAX
CTE Job Number 104009
I ENGINEERING, INC.
April 24, 2000
CONSTRUCTION . TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
SAN DIEGO, CA • RIVERSIDE, CA VENTURA, CA
2414 Vineyard Ave. 490 E. Princeland Ct. 1645 Pacific Ave.
Suite G Suite 7 Suite 105
Escondido, CA 92029 Corona, CA 91719 Oxnard, CA 93033
(760) 746.4955 (909) 371.1890 (661) 486-6475
(760) 746-9806 FAX (909) 371-2168 FAX (661) 486-9016 FAX
Mr. Samuel Wright
Wright Design
1287 Buena Vista Way
Carlsbad, California 92008
Phone: 760/944-1541 Facsimile: 760/944-1594
Subject: Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street
Carlsbad, California
Dear Mr. Wright:
As you requested, our geotechnical investigation for the referenced site is attached. This report
presents the findings and limitations of our study to date. Our investigations were performed to
provide geotechnical recommendations for the proposed structures. We understand that the existing
residence is to be removed and replaced with a single-family dwelling.
The proposed project is feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint if the recommendations presented in
this report are carried out.
Respectfully submitted,
CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
Dan T.. Math
Project Engineering
16
Ce_p1O-4009RP1.GeotechnicaI tnvuanon.doc
GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
4 a
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ............................................................................................... i
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES...............................................................2
I
1.1 Introduction ............................ . ....................................................................................... 2
1.2 Scope of Services Provided ...........................................................................................2
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 2
3.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS ...........................................................3
I
3.1 Field Investigations........................................................................................................3
3.2 Laboratory Investigation ................................................................................................ 4
4.0 GEOLOGY.........................................................................................................................4
4.1 General Setting...............................................................................................................4
4.2 Geologic Conditions......................................................................................................4
4.2.1 Topsoils..................................................................................................................5
4.2.2 Quaternary Terrace Deposits .................................................................................... s
4.3 Groundwater Conditions ................................................................................................. 5
4.4 Geologic Hazards ........................................................................................................... 5
4.4.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation...................................................................5
4.4.2 Local and Regional Faulting....................................................................................6
4.4.3 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Evaluation......................................................6
4.4.4 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation..............................................................................7
4.4.5Landsliding or Rocksliding.......................................................................................7
4.4.6 Compressible and Expansive Soils...........................................................................7
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................................8
5.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 8
5.2 Grading and Earthwork .................................................................................................8
5.3 Site Preparation.............................................................................................................8
5.4 Site Excavation...............................................................................................................9
5.5 Backfill Placement and Compaction...............................................................................9
5.6 Fill Materials .................................................................................................................. 10
5.7 Temporary Construction Slopes...................................................................................10
5.8 Foundations and Slab Recommendations......................................................................11
5.8.1 Foundations..........................................................................................................11
5.8.2 Foundation Settlement .................................................................... . ...................... 12
5.8.3 Foundation Setback ...............................................................................................12
5.8.4 Concrete Slabs ...................................................................................................... 12
5.9 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures ........................................................................12
5.10 Seismic Loading Parameters ......................................................................................14
5.11 Exterior Flatwork......................................................................................................14
5.12 Drainage....................................................................................................................14
5.13 Construction Observation..........................................................................................15
5.14 Plan Review ................................................................................................................ 16
nvcigaD.an.doc
6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION .16
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 SITE INDEX MAP
FIGURE 2 EXPLORATION MAP
FIGURE 3 RETAINING WALL DRAINAGE DETAIL
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A REFERENCES CITED
APPENDIX B FIELD EXPLORATIONS
APPENDIX C LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS
)
VCte_scioje\IO-4OO9GRflQgotecbjücaj Invesdpdon.doc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 1
Proposed Wáyman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
INVESTIGATION SUMMARY
This investigation was performed to provide site-specific geotechnical information for the proposed
Wayman residence. The site is located on Spruce Street, in the Carlsbad area of San Diego County,
California. Our investigation found that the proposed structure is directly underlain by a thin layer of
topsoil, down to approximately one to two feet below grade (fbg). Native Quaternary Terrace
Deposits were found to underlie the topsoils to the maximum explored depth of approximately 19.5
fbg.
Specifically, the topsoils consisted generally of moist, loose, silty fine sands, with abundant organic
matter, e.g. roots, grass, worm burrows. Quaternary Terrace deposits excavated as moist to wet,
medium dense to very dense, silty fine sands to find sands.
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings to maximum explored depth of
approximately 19.5 fbg. Although groundwater levels will likely fluctuate during periods of
precipitation, groundwater is not expected to affect the proposed development if proper site drainage
is maintained.
With respect to geologic and seismic hazards, the site is considered as safe as any within the San
I Diego County area, a region of moderate to high seismic risk. Based on the geologic findings and
reference review, no active surface faults are known to exist at the site. However, the Newport-
I Inglewood Fault Zone (offshore) lies approximately 5.3 miles to the west.
\Ctcs\projecs\1O4009GRPreotechnicai Invogadon.dcc
I Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 2
Proposed Wayman Residence
I 2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000
- - CTE Job No. 10-4009
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
1. 1 Introduction
This report presents the results of our geotechnical investigation and provides conclusions and
engineering criteria for the proposed development. It is our understanding that site improvements are
to consist of demolishing the existing residence and replacing in with a new single-family dwelling
within the existing building footprint. Our investigation included field exploration, laboratory testing,
geologic hazard evaluation, and engineering analysis. Specific recommendations for excavations, fill
placement, and foundation design for the proposed improvements are presented in this report. Cited
references are presented in Appendix A.
1.2 Scope of Services Provided
The scope of services provided included:
I • Exploration of subsurface conditions to depths influenced by the proposed construction.
Laboratory testing of representative soil samples to provide data to evaluate the geotechnical
I design characteristics of the soils.
Definition of the general geology and evaluation of potential geologic hazards at the site.
Soil engineering design criteria for the proposed improvements.
I . Preparation of this summary report of the investigation performed including geotechnical
construction recommendations.
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The site is located on the eastern side of Spruce Street, just north of its intersection with Forest
Avenue in the city of Carlsbad. The intersection of Interstate Freeway 5 and State Freeway 78 lies
about ½ mile northwest of the site, the Pacific Ocean is about one mile to the west. The existing
house is situated on a sloped pad, descending gently from the existing residence to the west. Four to
five-foot high retaining walls support the front yard along Spruce Street. Approximately three to
htvcgaIion4oc
&
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 3
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
five-foot high slopes ascend from .the east of the existing structure towards the adjacent lot. The
current residence sits above a two-car garage on a concrete pad with piers supporting the perimeter
of the residence above the garage.
Land use in the area is entirely residential. Numerous trees, shrubs and planter areas lie across the
site with an extensive sprinkler system. Block walls and wood fencing border the site on its north and
east property lines, respectively. A driveway easement borders the south property line. Overhead
electric lies extend onto the property from Spruce Street. Figures 1 and 2 show the location and
configuration of the site. The site elevation is approximately 135 feet above mean sea level.
3.0 FIELD AND LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
3.1 Field Investigations
Field explorations, conducted on April 10, 2000 included site reconnaissance and the drilling of three
exploratory borings to assess the condition of subsurface soil materials. The soil borings were
excavated using a tripod-mounted, 4-inch diameter, solid-stem auger, limited access drill rig to a
maximum explored depth of approximately 19.5 fbg. A geologist logged and visually classified soils
in the field using the Unified Soil Classification System. The field descriptions have been modified,
where appropriate, to reflect laboratory test results. Soil boring logs including descriptions of the
soil, field-testing data, and supplementary laboratory data references are included in Appendix B.
Approximate soil boring locations are shown on Figure 2.
\Cc..sNc%pI0.4OO9GPGeotecJuicJ InvugaüoILdoc
I Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 4
Proposed Wayman Residence
I 2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
1 April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
Relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained with standard split-spoon samplers for geotechnical
laboratory analysis. Specifics ofour soil boring and sampling program conducted are presented in
Appendix B. Bulk soil samples were also collected from the drill cuttings for geotechnical laboratory
analysis. Samples collected in this manner were placed in sealed plastic bags and transported to the
CTE geotechnical laboratory for analysis.
3.2 Laboratory Investigation
Laboratory tests were conducted on representative soil samples for classification purposes and to
evaluate physical properties and engineering characteristics. Laboratory tests for in-place moisture
I and density, grain-size distribution, direct shear analysis, consolidation potential and Modified Proctor
were performed. Test method descriptions and laboratory results are included in Appendix C.
4.0 GEOLOGY
4.1 General Setting
The site lies within the coastal North San Diego County portion of the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic
I province. The area is generally characterized by flat, uplifted marine terraces dissected by intermittent
streams. Buena Vista Lagoon, fed by Buena Vista Creek lies quarter-mile to the north. The area
I topography slopes down to the west and the north toward the Pacific Ocean and Buena Vista
Lagoon.
I 4.2 Geologic Conditions
Based on geologic mapping by Tan and Kennedy (1996), the site is underlain by Quaternary
I Terrace Deposits. Based on this investigation, site soils consist of a thin layer of topsoils
I underlain by Quaternary Terrace Deposits to a maximum explored depth of 19.5 tbg.
Cc_sptojectMI0.4OO9&FtOcotcchjiica1 Inves0pdonAm
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation .. Page 5
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 . CTE Job No. 10-4009
4.2.1 Topsoils
Topsoils were encountered in all of the borings to a maximum depth of approximately two to
three fbg. These materials were found to consist of loose, moist, dark brown, silty fine sands
with abundant organics e.g. roots, grass, worm burrows. These materials are not considered
suitable for support of the proposed structure.
4.2.2 Ouaternary Terrace Deposits
Native Quaternary Terrace Deposits were encountered underlying topsoils in all of the soil
borings. Quaternary Terrace Deposit materials excavated as generally moist to wet, medium
dense to very dense, orange brown to orange, poorly-graded silty fine sands to fine sands with
trace micas. These materials were excavated to the maximum explored depth of 19.5 fbg.
4.3 Groundwater Conditions
Groundwater was not encountered in our explorations to the maximum explored depth of 19.5 fbg.
Groundwater is not expected to affect the improvements if existing drainage patterns are maintained.
4.4 Geologic Hazards
I 4.4.1 General Geologic Hazards Observation
I Based on our reference review and observations, it appears that geologic hazards at the site
I
are primarily limited to those caused by violent shaking from earthquake generated ground
motion waves. The potential for damage from displacement or fault movement beneath the
I proposed structures should be considered low.
Investigaon.doc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 6
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
4.4.2 Local and Regional Faulting
Based on our site reconnaissance, evidence from our exploratory soil borings, and a review of
appropriate geologic literature, it is our opinion that the site is not on known active fault
traces. The Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone (offshore), approximately 5.3 miles (9
kilometers) to the west, is the closest known active fault (Blake, 1996). Other principal active
regional faults include: Coronado Banks, Elsinore, Rose Canyon, San Clemente, Superstition
Hills, San Jacinto, and San Andreas faults. According to the California Division ofMines and
Geology, a fault is active if it displays evidence of activity in the last 11,000 years (Hart,
1994).
4.4.3 Liquefaction and Seismic Settlement Evaluation
Liquefaction occurs when saturated fine-grained sands or silts lose their physical strengths
during earthquake induced shaking and behave as a liquid. This is due to loss of
point-to-point grain contact and transfer of normal stress to the pore water. Liquefaction
potential varies with water level, soil type, material gradation, relative density, and probable
intensity and duration of ground shaking.
Because, of the generally medium dense to very dense nature of underlying materials and lack
of a shallow groundwater table, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction damage to
proposed improvements should be considered low.
Seismic settlement occurs when loose to medium dense granular soils densifr during seismic
events. Because the underlying site soil materials were generally found to be medium dense
'Ce_sproject1O.4OO9G,RPt_Oeoechmca1 Invgationdoc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 7
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
to very dense, the potential for seismic settlement should be considered low. It is anticipated
that loose surficial soils will be mitigated during site grading.
4.4.4 Tsunamis and Seiche Evaluation
According to McCulloch (1985), the tsunami potential in the San Diego County coastal area
for one-in-100 and one-in-500 year tsunami waves are approximately four and six feet. This
suggests that there is a very low probability of site damage due to the elevation of the site
(approximately 135 feet above mean sea level) and distance (1.5 miles) from the ocean. The
site is not near any significant bodies of water that could induce seiche damage.
4.4.5Landsliding or Rocksliding
The site area is considered to be generally susceptible to landsliding (Tan and Giffen, 1995).
However, active landslides were not encountered and have not been mapped within a quarter
mile of the site. In addition, site soils materials are not typically prone to landsliding.
Therefore, landslides are not considered a significant hazard within or immediately adjacent to
I the proposed structures.
4.4.6 Compressible and Expansive Soils
I We expect that loose surficial fill and disturbed soils will be mitigated by excavation and
I removal during the construction process. Based on geologic observation, laboratory and in
situ testing, soil materials located at the proposed structure foundation level generally consist
I of medium dense to very dense, silty fine sands to sands with low compressibility and
Ctespr10.409GftFrGeotcchnicaI bwestigation.doc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 8
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
expansion characteristics. In summary, these deposits are considered suitable for support of
the proposed structure.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 General
We conclude that the proposed construction on the site is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint,
provided the recommendations in this report are incorporated into the design of the project. The
major geotechnical factor affecting the proposed development is the presence of loose organic
topsoils. Recommendations for the design and construction of the proposed improvements are
included below.
5.2 Grading and Earthwork
CTE should continuously observe the grading and earthwork operations for this project. Such
observations are essential to identify field conditions that differ from those predicted by this
investigation, to adjust designs to actual field conditions, and to verify that the grading is in overall
accordance with the recommendations of this report. Our personnel should perform adequate
observation and sufficient testing of fills during grading to support our professional opinion regarding
compliance with compaction requirements and specifications.
5.3 Site Preparation
Before grading, the site should be cleared of any topsoil, existing debris, loose or disturbed fill soils,
and other deleterious materials, estimated to be one to two feet outside the existing structure. Based
on our investigation, proposed foundations should bear entirely on native Quaternary Terrace
Deposits.
\\Cte_rvpzoject10-4009G\RPT_Geotcchnicai 1nvcsgaon.doc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 9
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
Before placing fill, the bottoms of any excavations should be observed by the geotechnical
representative to verify compliance with recommendations. Organic materials not suitable for
structural backfill should be disposed of off-site or placed in non-structural planter or landscape areas.
All organic materials excavated and removed should be disposed of at a legal disposal site.
5.4 Site Excavation
Excavations in site materials should generally be accomplished with heavy-duty construction
equipment under normal conditions. Irreducible materials greater than three inches encountered
during excavations should not be used in fills on the site. Before placing fill, the exposed bottom of
all excavations should be scarified; properly moisture conditioned and recompacted. Overexcavations
may need to be preformed in the event of cut/fill transitions. It is recommended that excavation for
the primary structure be performed such that a minimum of 12 inches of engineered fill is provided
beneath proposed slabs-on-grade or exterior improvements. This grading should be conducted
laterally to a distance of five feet beyond building limits.
5.5 Backfill Placement and Compaction
The geotechnical consultant should verify that the proper site preparation, including removal of
unsuitable materials, has occurred before fill placement. Fill and backfill should be compacted to a
minimum relative compaction of 90%, as evaluated by ASTM D1557, at a moisture content between
optimum and 2 percent above optimum. Backfill placed within the upper foot beneath pavement
areas should be compacted to 95% per ASTM D 1557. The optimum lift thickness for backfill soil
will be dependent on the type of compaction equipment used. Generally, backfill should be placed in
uniform lifts not exceeding 8-inches in loose thickness. Backfill placement and compaction should be
done in overall conformance with geotechnical recommendations and local ordinances.
Cte_savaprcts\I0.4009GRF_CeotcchmcaI tnvesl,gazon.doc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 10
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
5.6 FiliMaterials
Existing on-site soils are considered suitable for reuse on the site as compacted fill, provided they are
screened of organic materials and materials greater than three inches in maximum dimension.
Imported fill beneath structures, pavements and walks should have an expansion index less than or
equal to 30 (per UBC 18-I-B) with less than 35 percent passing the no. 200 sieve. Imported fill soils
for use in structural or slope areas should be evaluated by the soils engineer to determine strength
-
characteristics before placement on the site.
5.7 Temporary Construction Slopes
Provided below are sloping recommendations for unshored temporary excavations. The
recommended slopes should be relatively stable against deep-seated failure, but may experience
localized sloughing. Based on the granular, non-cohesive nature of natural Terrace Deposits, on-site
materials are considered Type A soils with recommended temporary slope ratios as set forth in Table
1 below.
SOILS TYPE SLOPE RATIO MAXIMUM HEIGHT
(Horizontal: Vertical)
I B (Quaternary Terrace
Deposits & Engineered Fills) 1: 1 (MAXIMUM) 10 FEET
A "competent person" must verify actual field conditions and soil type designations while temporary
excavations exist according to Cal-OSHA regulations. In addition, the above sloping
recommendations do not allow for surcharge loading at the top of slopes by vehicular traffic,
Invgaiion.doc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 11
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTh Job No. 10-4009
equipment or materials. Appropriate surcharge setbacks must be maintained from the top of all
unshored slopes.
5.8 Foundations and Slab Recommendations
The following recommendations are for preliminary planning purposes only. These
recommendations should be reviewed after completion of earthworks to verify that conditions
exposed are as anticipated.
5.8.1 Foundations
Continuous and isolated spread footings are suitable for use at this site. However, footings
should not straddle cut/fill interfaces (transitions), and therefore for new structures
constructed at this site all building footings should be founded entirely on native Quaternary
Terrace Deposits. Foundation dimensions and reinforcement should be based on allowable
bearing values of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for footings founded on competent
Quaternary Terrace Deposits. The allowable bearing values may be increased by one third for
short duration Loading which includes the effects of wind or seismic forces.
Footings should be at least 15 inches wide and have a minimum embedment of 18 inches
below the lowest adjacent subgrade. In order to found proposed footings on native
formational materials we anticipate footings will be embedded 18 to 24 inches below the
existing subgrade elevation. For the anticipated construction, minimum footing reinforcement
for continuous footings should consist of four #4 reinforcing bars, two placed near the top
and two near the bottom of the footing. The structural engineer should design isolated
footing reinforcement and pipe penetrations.
\pojeIOO9RflGeotec)uücil InvgaD.on.doc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 12
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
5.8.2 Foundation Settlement
The potential for foundation settlement should be analyzed once actual foundation loads are
kncwn. In general, for the anticipated loads and bearing pressure the total and differential
settlements are expected to be on the order of 1.0 and 0.5 inches, respectively.
5.8.3 Foundation Setback
Footings for structures should be designed such that the minimum horizontal distance from
the face of nearby slopes to the. outer edge of the footing is at least 10 feet.
5.8.4 Concrete Slabs
Concrete slabs-on-grade should be at least four inches thick. At a minimum, concrete slabs
should be reinforced with #3 reinforcing bars placed on 18-inch centers or #4 reinforcing bars
on 24-inch centers each way. All slab reinforcement should be properly supported to ensure
placement near mid-height of the concrete.
If moisture sensitive floor areas are proposed, a vapor barrier consisting of a minimum of six-
mll polyethylene sheeting or equivalent membrane with all laps sealed should underlie slabs.
This membrane should be placed over three inches of compacted clean coarse sand (Sand
Equivalent >30) base or gravel covered with a minimum of one inch of clean sand to protect
the sheeting during concrete placement operations.
I 5.9 Lateral Resistance and Earth Pressures
Lateral loads acting against structures may be resisted by friction between the footings and the
I supporting soil or passive pressure acting against structures. If frictional resistance is used, we
\Cc_spojcts1O.409Rfl_Geotchnica1InvestigaIion4oc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 13
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
recommend allowable coefficients of friction of 0.35 (total frictional resistance equals coefficient of
friction times the dead load) for concrete cast directly against compacted fill or scarified and
recompacted competent, native materials. A design passive resistance value of 250 pounds per square
foot per foot of depth (with a maximum value of 1250 pounds per square foot) may be used. This
value assumes a horizontal soil extending at least 10 feet. The allowable lateral resistance can be
taken as the sum of the frictional resistance and the passive resistance, provided the passive resistance
does not exceed two-thirds of the total allowable resistance.
Retaining and basement walls up to the proposed height of 20 feet and backfilled using granular soils
may be designed using the equivalent fluid weights given in Table 2 below. Onsite soils may be used
as granular backfill if proper site preparation and placement methods are used.
I
I
The above values assume non-expansive backfill and free draining conditions. Soils with an
expansion index less than 30 should be used as retaining wall backfill material. Measures should be
I taken to prevent a moisture buildup behind all retaining walls. Drainage measures should include free
fnvgauo,Ldoc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 14
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
draining backfill materials and perforated drains. Drains should discharge to an appropriate offsite
location. Figure 3 is a diagram of a typical retaining wall drain system.
5.10 Seismic Loading Parameters
In accordance with the 1997 UBC, the site lies within an area with a seismic source type of B, with a
seismic zone factor of Z = 0.4. Based on the distance from the site to the Newport-Inglewood Fault,
9 km, near source factors are N =1.0 and N. = 1.0. Based on the explorations performed the site
subsurface soils have a soil profile type of SD, a seismic coefficient C = 0.64, and C. = 0.44.
5.11 Exterior Flatwork
To reduce the potential for distress to exterior flatwork caused by minor settlement of foundation
soils, we recommend that such flatwork be installed with crack-control joints at appropriate spacing
as designed by the project architect. Flatwork, which should be installed with crack control joints,
includes driveways, sidewalks, and architectural features. All subgrade should be prepared according
to the earthwork recommendations previously given before placing concrete. Positive drainage
should be established and maintained adjacent to all flatwork.
5.12 Drainage
Foundation and concrete-slab-on grade performance depends greatly on how well the runoff waters
drain from the site. This is true both during construction and over the entire life of the structure. The
I
ground surface around structures should be graded so that water flows rapidly away from the
structures without ponding. The surface gradient needed to do this depends on the landscaping type.
In general, the pavements and flowerbeds within five feet of buildings should slope away at gradients
I .
?Ctsviprojectst0.4009RPr_Geotethnica1 tnvigadon.doc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 15
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
of at least two percent. Densely vegetated areas should have minimum gradients of five percent away
from buildings if doing so is practical.
Planters should be constructed so that water from them will not seep into the foundation areas or
beneath slabs and pavement. In any event, the site maintenance personnel should be instructed to
limit irrigation to the minimum actually necessary to sustain the landscaping plants properly. Should
excessive irrigation, waterline breaks, or unusually high rainfall occur, saturated zones and
groundwater may develop. Consequently, the site should be graded so that water drains away readily
without saturating the foundation or landscaped areas or cascading over slope faces. A potential
source of water, such as water pipes, drains, and the like should be frequently examined for signs of
leakage or damage. Any such leakage or damage should be repaired promptly. The project Civil
Engineers should thoroughly evaluate the on-site drainage and make provisions as necessary to keep
surface waters from affecting the site.
5.13 Construction Observation
The recommendations provided in this report are based on preliminary design information for the
proposed construction and the subsurface conditions found in the exploratory locations. The
interpolated and underlying subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction
to verify that conditions are as anticipated.
Recommendations provided in this report are based on the understanding and assumption that CTE
will provide the observation and testing services for the project. Earthwork should be observed and
tested as necessary to verify that grading activity has been performed according. to the
Invcsigaton.doc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 16
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No. 10-4009
recommendations contained within this report. Footing excavations should be evaluated by the
geotechnical representative to verify compliance with recommendations herein prior to footing
material placement.
5.14 Plan Review
CTE should review the project plans and specifications, with respect to geotechnical issues, before
commencement of earthwork to identify potential conflicts with the recommendations contained in
this report.
6.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION
The field evaluation, laboratory testing and geotechnical analysis presented in this report have been
conducted according to current engineering practice and the standard of care exercised by reputable
geotechnical consultants performing similar tasks in this area. No other warranty, expressed or
implied, is made regarding the conclusions, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report.
Variations may exist and conditions not observed or described in this report may be encountered
during construction.
Our conclusions and recommendations are based on an analysis of the observed conditions. If
I
conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, our office should be notified
and additional recommendations, if required, will be provided upon request.
\tCc_savptojeOO9G'RPr_Geotechnica1 invgauon.doc
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Page 17
Proposed Wayman Residence
2360 Spruce Street, Carlsbad, California
April 24, 2000 CTE Job No: 10-4009
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service. If you have any questions or comments, please do
not hesitate contact the undersigned.
Respectfully submitted,
CONSTRUCTION TES G & EN G, INC.
Od n )eD.lar ar
#73 (#!5m J9I Lynch, EG# 1890
Geotechnical Engineering Man * Senior Engineering Geologist
At F. Dan T. Math - No. 1690 Project Engineer I CERTIRED 11'
ENGINEERING 11*
GEOLOGIST A&
\Ctesew4rojec1sU0-4OO9GRFr_CcotechzticaI InvtipIion.doc
o 1t4 Ill I MILES
mmmI I
0 1320 2640 5280 FEET
SOURCE: THOMAS BROTHERS MAPS
2000 SAN DIEGO EDITION
\PROJSCTSIO-400qINDEXMAPCNV
B-I
LEGEND
• APPROXIMATE BORING
u-i LOCATION
APPROXIMATE TEST PIT
SURFACE LOCATION
FLOW 0
m
EXISTING RESIDENCE .
'I
DRIVEWAY /
/ B-3
I .
Now
Is
TI'-1
SURFACE
FLOW
I
SIDEWALK
SPRUCE STEET
I
.
CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC PROPOSED WAYMAN RESIDENCE NO SCALE
CAKL BAD, CAUFORNIA
1 2 GEOThCHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
I
EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP 10-4009
2360 SPRUCE STREET
_____________
2411 VINEYARD AVENUI Sri! (I EScUNDII)() CA. 921129 (7iIJ) 74u93S FIGURE,
*IININtEtNC
RETAINING W I
WALL BACKFILL COMPACTED
TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY
3/4" GRAVEL SURROUNDED
BY FILTER FABRIC (MIRAFI
140 N, OR EQUIVALENT),
1'MIN
FINISH GRADE
4" DIA. PERFORATED PVC
PIPE (SCHEDULE 40 OR
EQUIVALENT). MINIMUM
1% GRADIENT TO SUITABLE
OUTLET
'— MINIMUM 6" LAYER OF
FILTER ROCK UNDERLYING
PIPE
WALL FOOTING
APPENDIX A
REFERENCES CITED
\\Csprojects10.409GRpt_GeotecIujcaj (nveganon.doc
REFERENCES CITED
Blake, T.F., 1996, "EQFAULT," Version 2.20, Thomas F. Blake Computer Services and
Software.
Hart, Earl W., Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Aiquist Priolo, Special Studies
Zones Act of 1972 California Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42, revised
1994.
Jennings, Charles W., Fault Map of California with Locations of Volcanoes, Thermal Springs
and Thermal Wells, revised 1987.
McCulloch, D.S., 1985, "Evaluating Tsunami Potential" in Ziony, J.I., ed., Evaluating
Earthquake Hazards in the Los Angeles Region - An Earth-Science Perspective, U.S.
Geological Survey Professional Paper 1360.
Tan, S. S. and Kennedy, M.P.., 1996, "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego
County, California: California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 96-02
Tan, 5: S. and Giffen D.S., 1995, "Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego
Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, California: Landslide Hazard Identification Map No.
35", California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 95-04
fnvga,on4oc
APPENDIX B
FIELD EXPLORATION METHODS AND BORINGS LOGS
Cte_pojects\I0-1009GP.Pr_Geoiectuáca lnvgaion4oc
Soil Boring Methods
Relatively "Undisturbed" Soil Samples
Relatively "undisturbed" soil samples were collected using a modified California-drive sampler (2.4-
inch inside diameter, 3-inch outside diameter) lined with sample rings. Drive sampling was conducted
in general accordance with ASTM D-3550. The steel sampler was driven into the bottom of the
borehole with successive drops of a 140-pound weight falling 30-inches. Blow counts (N) required
for sampler penetration are shown on the boring logs in the column "Blows/Foot." The soil was
retained in brass rings (2.4 inches in diameter, 1.00 inch in height). The samples were retained and
carefully sealed in waterproof plastic containers for shipment to the Construction Testing &
Engineering ("CTE") geotechnical laboratory.
Disturbed Soil Sampling
Bulk soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis using two methods. Standard Penetration
Tests (SPT) were performed according to ASTM D-1586 at selected depths in the borings using a
standard (1.4-inches inside diameter, 2-inches outside diameter) split-barrel sampler. The steel
sampler was driven into the bottom of the borehole with successive drops of a 140-pound weight
falling 30-inches. Blow counts (N) required for sampler penetration are shown on the boring logs in
the column "Blows/Foot." Samples collected in this manner were placed in sealed plastic bags. Bulk
soil samples of the drill cuttings were also collected in large plastic bags. All disturbed soil samples
were returned to the CTE geotechnical laboratory for analysis.
Ctc_spxojeczsI0.409QRPT_Gcotecju,jwg Invesogation.doc
(CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
£' GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
___________ 2114 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE 0 ESCONDIDO CA. 92029 (760) 116.1973
GDRDGj4C
PROJECT: DRILLER: SHEET: or
CTE JOB NO: DRILL METHOD: DRILLING DATE:
LOGGED BY: . SAMPLE METHOD: . ELEVATION:
CL 43 -.
Ca BORING LEGEND
0joci a
DESCRIPTION
- - 4 - Block or Chunk Sample -'- - - -
Laboratory Tests
Bulk Sample
Standard Penetration Test
Modified Split-Barrel Drive Sampler (Cal Sampler)
Thin Walled Army Corp. of Engineers Sample
-- I - I I Groundwater Table
- Formation Change [(Approximate boundaries queried (?)1
Soil Type or Classification Change -
[Approximate boundaries queried0)1
Quotes are placed around classifications where the soils
exist in situ as bedrock
FIGURE: I BL2
%CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
2414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA. 921129 I7"' .16.4I5
GDR1NG4C
DEFINITION OF TERMS
PRIMARY DIVISIONS SYMBOLS SECONDARY DIVISIONS
GRAVELS CLEAN ""' WELL GRADED GRAVELS. GRAVEL-SAND MIXTURES GW MORE THAN GRAVELS .o LITTLE OR NO FINES
I... POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL SAND MIXTURES. z HALF OF <5% FINES
COARSE fi_GP ' LITTLE OF NO FINES
GRAVELS
SILTY GRAVELS. GRAVEL-SAND-SILT MIXTURES. C 0 FRACTION IS
- LARGER THAN NON-PLASTIC FINES
CLAYEY GRAVELS. GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES. WITH FINES 5: NO.4SIEVE GC 1 _____________________________________
SANDS CLEAN
_____
WELL GRADED SANDS. GRAVELLY SANDS, LI
PLASTIC_FINES •
1. OR NO
MORE THAN
HALF OF
SANDS FINES _____ ______________________________ _______ POORLY GRADED SANDS, GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR
COARSE
<5% FINES SP NO FINES
SANDS J,I I I SILTY SANDS. SAND-SILT MIXTURES, NON-PLASTIC FINES FRACTION IS
SMALLER THAN WITH FINES CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES, PLASTIC FINES
- NO. 4 SIEVE
INORGANIC SILTS, VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK FLOUR, SILTY
LU SILTS AND CLAYS I: ML OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS. SLIGHTLY PLASTIC CLAYEY SILTS
V E INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM PLASTICITY, =4 0 LIQUID LIMIT IS 0 L6
LESS THAN 5O ______ GRAVELLY. SANDY. SILTS OR LEAN CLAYS
I Ii OL ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY
r4 z 41IIIII+.l INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS FINE MH I I i SANDY OR SILTY SOILS. ELASTIC SILTS 1) Iii j ,,I,
CH51 4c
INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY. FAT CLAYS SILTS AND CLAYS
UIDLIMITIS 6- Z LIQ
GREATER THAN 50 ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY,
ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
GRAIN SIZES
BOULDERS I COBBLES GRAVEL SAND SILTS AND CLAYS COARSE I FINE f COARSE I MEDIUM I FINE
12" 3" 3/4" 4 10 40 200
CLEAR SQUARE SIEVE OPENING U.S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE
ADDITIONAL TESTS
(OTHER THAN TEST PIT AND BORING LOG COLUMN HEADINGS)
MAX- Maximum Dry Density PM- Permeability PP- Pocket Penetrometer
GS- Grain Size Distribution SG- Specific Gravity WA- Wash Analysis
SE- Sand Equivalent HA- Hydrometer Analysis DS- Direct Shear
El- Expansion Index AL- Atterberg Limits UC- Unconfined Compression
CHM- Sulfate and Chloride RV- R-Value MD- Moisture/Density
Content. pH, Resistivity CN- Consolidation M- Moisture
COR - Corrosivity SC- Swell Compression
FIGURE:I BLI
ONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
,,
GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
A!t 414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA. 9i9 176111 73"•4953
GINGC
PROJECT: PROPOSED WAYMAN RESIDENCE DRILLER: SOUTH COAST DRILLING SHEET: I of
CTE JOB NO: 104009 DRILL METHOD: 4' TRIPOD MOUNTED SSA DRILLING DATE: 4/10100
LOGGED BY: DU SAMPLE METHOD: DRIVE ELEVATION:
.J !B BORING: B-i Laboratory Tests
I
,
•
DESCRIPTION
- - - -
- TOPSOIL: Loose, moist, dark brown silty fine SAND with organics,
SM roots, grass etc.
- -
Lighter brown
. QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS:
- -
- 6 130.2 6.2 SM Medium dense, moist, orange brown, silty fine to medium SAND. MD
/11
Il
- 10 SM Medium Dense, moist, brighter orange brown, silty to clayey CN
I 13 fine to medium SAND.
19
16 SM Dense to very dense, moist, orange brown, silty fine to medium WA
22 SAND with black manganesse grains. 40_
31
30 104.9 3.8 SP-SM Very dense, moist, orange brown to yellow brown, fine to medium MD
- - 44 — — — a SAND with silt.
— - —
- Total depth: 16 feet
No watertable encountered
- No refusal
- Boring backfllled with cuttings
20-
25-
- — — — — FIGURE:1 B-I
,CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
. GEOTECHNICAI. AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
:414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE C ESCONDIDO CA. 920 171,411 714,.493$
BGD4.IC
PROJECT: PROPOSED WAYMAN RESIDENCE DRILLER: SOUTH COAST DRILLING SHEET: I of
CTE JOB NO: 10-4009 DRILL METHOD: 4' TRIPOD MOUNTED SSA DRILLING DATE: 4/10/00
LOGGED BY: DU SAMPLE METHOD: DRIVE ELEVATION:
-
U 6
c
co~
BORING B-2 Laboratory Tests
.
I
CL
DESCRIPTION
0- - - - - - ropsolL: Loose, moist, dark brown silty fine SAND with organics,
- SM roots, grass, worm burrows etc.
? ? ? ? ? MAX
- QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS:
- 4 5 SM Medium dense, moist to wet, orange brown, silty fine to medium DS
9 SAND.
II
-
- 7 SP Medium dense, moist to wet, orange brown, fine to medium OS
10 SAND with trace manganesse grains..
II
-
- 12 113.3 8.5 SP-SM Dense, to very dense, moist to wet, bright orange brown, fine to MD
19 SP medium SAND with silt and trace manganesse grains to grayish
1
-35 brown SAND with trace mica.
15 T 12 SM Medium dense to dense, moist to wet, orange silty tine to medium WA
I 16 SAND with fine mica.
L 19
- 13 SM Dense, moist to wet, orange brown to gray, silty fine to medium
'7 SAND.
- - ...24. - - - -
20-
Total depth: 19.5 feet
I - - No watertable encountered
No refusal
-
L
Boring backfilled with cuttings
125- - - FIGURE:I —I B-
ctCONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
./ \O GEOTECHNICA. AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
1414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE G ESCONDIDO CA. 92029 (7f,,h 1h.4433
GUIEERINGjNC
PROJECT: PROPOSED WAYMAN RESIDENCE DRILLER: SOUTH COAST DRILLING SHEET: I of
CTE JOB NO: 104009 DRILL METHOD: 4" TRIPOD MOUNTED SSA DRILLING DATE: 4/10/00
LOGGED BY: DU SAMPLE METHOD: DRIVE ELEVATION:
- - - -
r
- -
-
a
-
zir IE
>1 & BORING: B-3 Laboratory Tests
; •
DESCRIPTION
0- - - - TOPSOIL: Loose, moist, dark brown silty fine SAND with organics,
- SM roots. grass, worm burrows etc.
? ?
-
Lighter brown
- QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS:
r7 SM Medium dense, moist to wet, orange brown, silty fine to medium WA
I 7 SAND.
L 8
10- II SM Medium dense to dense, moist to wet, orange silty fine to medium
13 . SAND with fine mica.
IS - - - - - -
Total depth: 11.5 feet
-
- No watertable encountered
No refusal
Boring backfilled with cuttings
15-
20-
[25-
- - - - - - - - .FIGURE:I B-i
%CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
'% 4I GEOTECHNICAI. AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
9/' 2114 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE U ESCONDIDO CA. 92029 1760) 746.4933
ENGINEERINGJNC
PROJECT: PROPOSED WAYMAN RESIDENCE EXCAVATOR: SOUTH COAST DRILLING
CTE JOB NO: 10-4009 EXCAVATION METHOD: 4" TRIPOD MOUNTED SSA EXCAVATION DATE: 4/10/00
LOGGED BY DLJ SAMPLING METHOD: DRIVE ELEVATION:
- - - -
.5 LU CL
TEST PIT LOG: TP 1 Laboratory Tests
ze
. 0
U
:2 DESCRIPTION = = = VIEW TO WEST
- .-
CONCRETE SLAB
- - .
STEPS OUT 4 INCHES
CONCRETE FOOTING j
- QUATERNARY TERRACE DEPOSITS:
Medium dense, dry to moist, orange brown silty .
-
fine to medium SAND.
10-
15-
- - - - - flhiL1R: •II'-I
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS
F: I04OO9GRPT_Geo,chnicaI lnvagañon.doc
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY METHODS AND RESULTS
La-'raciy tests were performed on representative soil samples to detect their relative engineering
prcperies. Tests were performed following test methods of the American Society for Testing
Ma:erials or other accepted standards. The following presents a brief description of the various test
methods used. Laboratory results are presented in the following section of this Appendix.
Ci:ss&'caton
Soils were classified visually according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Visual
cla.,sificat ions were supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples according to ASTM
Pitic'-Sze Analysis
Faricie-size analyses were performed on selected representative samples according to ASTM D422.
Xi— Place Moisture/Density
Th' in-place moisture content and dry unit weight of selected samples were determined using
rclaiv y undisturbed chunk soil samples.
Direct Sh'ar
r't shear tests were performed on either samples direct from the field or on samples recompacted
o 90% 'f the laboratory maximum value overall. Direct shear testing was performed in accordance
-.:.-i ' A STM D3080-72 to evaluate the shear strength characteristics of selected materials. The
nlam.n.!-%_~s were inundated during shearing to represent adverse field conditions.
:ci;ec Proctor
Lrornnv compaction tests were performed according to ASTM D1557, Method A. A
.''11 y operated rammer was used during the compaction process.
rsc ki.ion
their compressibility and volume change behavior when loaded and wetted,
ev .indisturbed samples of representative samples from the investigation were subject
tests (ASTM D2435).
F: IO—OO9ORFT Gectechnical Invcsaiganon.doc
CONSTRUCT ION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.
' * GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
2414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE 0 ESCONDIDO CA. 92029 (760) 746.4953
DIRflGlC
UNDISTURBED MOISTURE AND DENSITY TEST
LOCATION DEPTH MOISTURE CONTENT DRY DENSITY
(feet) (%) (pcf)
B-I 34.5 6.2% 130.2
B-I 15-16.5 3.8% 104.9
B-2 9-10.5 8.5% 113.3
200 WASH ANALYSIS
LOCATION DEPTH PERCENT PASSING CLASSIFICATION
(feet) #200 SIEVE
B-i 9-10.5 20.9 SM
B-2 15-165 17.9 SM
B-3 5-6.5 22.5 SM
LABORATORY SUMMARY CTE JOB NO. 104009
2II11II1ll11IllIUfh1llh1IIllllhI ___________________
.i.III1IIllhIIIllIllIIIIUIIIIIIllh1 WAI___________________________
______IIIIIIllhIIIIIIIll_IIIHhIII1ftllI_ ______________
______IIIflhIIIllIIIIIII..IftIHhIIIIIIll
_______
v
_____
________IIIIIllhIIIIIIIII1llhIIIIIIIllI ;JW4 ag"JUP011111111 m lIllI f FAM
______________________________ 1 _.iII uuIfl—jjjjáflhI
IuiiIIIllhIiiiiiiIRuI1ullaIlIiI
TIME (ffdnutes)
FAILURE ENVELOPE
5000 -
4000 --
FA
co 3000-
< 2000-
/7.
1000
. I (1r0.008mjmm
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 .5000
VERTICAL STRESS (psf)
SHEAR STRENGTH TEST
Sample Designation Depth (ft) I Cohesion I Angle of Friction Sample Description
B2 3-4.5' . I 0 psf I 380 an Silty SAND
V-4ha
CONSTRUCTION
TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. I CTE JOB NO: 10-4009
vu GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION I
2414 VINEYARD AVENUE. SUITE 0 ESCONDIDO CA. 92029 (60) 746.4935 . I
I FIGURE: C-2
U. S. STANDARD SIEVE SIZE
r4
CD o o 8 8
- rn 00 •. en -
100
SC
70
60
C., z
50
w 40
96
30
20
10
0
R•.UU HH •r :I !
I I I I I
I
I I I
I'
)
I . :
I I I I I
Ii(i I
100 10 I 0.1 0.01 0.001
PARTICLE SIZE (mm)
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
Sample Designation ( Sample Depth (feet) I Symbol I Liquid Limit (%) I Plasticity hides I classification
y1',,.CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC.1 B-2 I 6-7.5 I • I - I - I SP
(iaoEI!CUNI(AI. AND COI1STKLI(1ION ENGINEERING TISTINCi AND INSPECTION I I I I J I
W01111 ill KIN.
III VINIY AKI) AVI14I1I1. stilT I C. IiS(0N1)hI)(P (A IIi)J I
1
I
CFL JOB NUMBER: 10-4009 FIGURE: C-3
'45
\ \ \\\
140 \ '. " \•\
\ \ \\
135
I30, .
125
[ \
. . 120
:\
jZ ''5 ..
..\.:..'u:.\.
lb . ..
. \\\\\
..
105
......
....
1130 \\• .\\
.
..
.\.\' \ ...
90
. . ... • .\
.:
•:,.....:.:. :.
\\'j\
85 .. .
.. ...
0 5 10 IS 20 25 30 35
PERCENT MOISTURE (%)
ASTM D1557 METHODS A C3 B 0 C
MODIFIED PROCTOR .
RESULTS
LAB
NUMBER
SAMPLE
NUMBER
DEPTH (FEET) SOIL DESCRIPTION
MAXIMUM
DRY DENSITY
OPTIMUM
MOISTURE
. (PCF) CONTENT(%)
0192 B-2 0-6 REDDISH SILTY SAND 128.9 10.0%.
CTE JOB NO: CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. DATE: 4/00
GEOTECHNICAL AND CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING TESTING AND INSPECTION
10-4009 GI.IRIINC 2414 VINEYARD AVENUE. STEG ESCONDIDO CA. Q20211 (760) 7464U55 FIGURE:. C-4
AUG-21-2000 MON 1111 All CITY OF CARLSBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 03
(2 1
Cit r_- bad
CERTIFICATE OF COMPL1AtCE
PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FM OR OTHER MJTIGATIOH
This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form,
Project Name: WAYMAN RESIDENCE*
Building Permit
Plan Check Number: CBOOI 948
-.
ProjectAddress: 2360 SPRUCE ST
A.P.N.; 156-052-2500
Project Applicant
(Owner(s) Name(s)) JIM & PATTY WAYMAN
--
Project Description: Demolish existing 1204 square foot home, build new 2,963 sq ft home
Building Type: SFD
Residential Number of New Dwelling Unite 1
Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling 2,963 (see above)
Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU
Res. Additions: Net Square Feet New Arel
ComercJ Ind.: Square Feet Floor Area
101 South Ranch Santa Fe Rd 710 Encinitas Blvd. - - Encinitas. Cf.. 82024 (944-4300) Encinitea, CA 92O24t753.69D
Certification of Applicant /Owner. The person executrng this dedaration ('Ownei") certitles under penally of pwjury that (1) the Information provided above Is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will 91e an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee II Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit Is
05;~
determination of units or square footage is found to be kicorrect, arid that (2) the Owner is the owned d described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration I; authorized to sign on bet If of the
S
2075 Las Palnias D.r.Iu' Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 4381 161 • FAX (760) 436-0894
P,uvffiuurl
AUG-21-2000 lION 11:11 AN CITY OF CARLSBAD FAX NO. 760 502 8558 P. 04
SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION
(To be completed by the school district(s))
THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WiLL BE SATISFIED.
SCHOOL DISTRICT:
The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may !sue building permits for this project.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL - DISTRICT OFFICIAl.
TITLE on Freeman
Ass* at cuper1ntendnt--- NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT Business Services Carlsbad Unified School br
Rfl1 !unu DATE
0 0 Carlsbad, California 9200
PHONE NUMBER 7. ,
S
S
AUG-21-2000 01:45 PM. SAMUEL.B.WRIGHT 760 720 7634
AUG-21-2000 NON ii:io AN CITY OF CARLSBAD FAX NO. 700 602 8558
City of Carlibad.
Plumbing. Ehcfrkjl,. Mec1ifcaI W.rlcilieet
FetAdè,u34 5/()! fT
PeimltNe._______
Questions below refer to work being done for this permit only.
Phirnbini
Number of new or relocated fixtures, ups, or floor drains?
New building sewer line? yes No
Number of roof drains? 92
Inctal Walter water line? yes ...k No_-
Number of water heaters?
• Nvmberofham bibs?
Gas piping system - Install Repair, -
Number of new or relocated ps outlets
New water meter. No.of_____ SIEC ____
Pôiable__________ irrigation
Electa'Ieal
Number of new panels or subpanels? P?.. --
Ezef New Service _______
Al' öce 't Single Phase 0 Size _____ Number of amperns -
Three Phase a • Number of amperes
Three Phase. 480 Number of amperes
Remodel (relocate existing outlets/switches or add oudets/.witches Yes _____ No -
Mechnieaj
Number of furna,. A/C, or heat pumps?
Number offlreplacas?
Number of exhaust lens?
Number of exhaust hoods?
Number of boilers or compressors?
New or relocated duct world
I
NumberofHP(
Yes_' No____
BEFORE THE PERMIT CAN BE FEE'D OUT THIS FORM NEEDS TO BE RETURNED TO THE BUILDING
DEPARTMENT. FAX NUMBER (760) 6024358
P.01
P 02