The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1430 SWEETBRIAR CIR | 1432 SWEETBRIAR CIR; ; CB880571; PermitIll z 0 ;= C IIC C _, u Ill 0 It I[ 0 u IIC Ill 0 _, 5 ~ Ill z • 0 z 0 ;= ~ z .., ... 2 0 u Ill i,c .., "' IIC 0 ~ if O I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provlalon1 ol Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) ol Division 3 ol the Business and ProlNelona Coo.. and my license la In lull force and effect. I hereby altirm !hat I am exempt trom lhe Contrac· 10< s Lanst Liw l0< the tottow,ng , .. ..., (Sec 7031 ~ 8uS£nHS ~ Protesst0ns Code Any city or county whtCli re qu,res a perrrut to construct. alter. tmprove. demot•sh. Of repair any structure. pnof to us issuance also requires !heap- phcanl for such permit to hie a s.gned statement that ne 1s hcense<S pursuant 10 the PfOVISIOns of the t.on1r1etor s Licenst uw (Chipter 9 cammenc,ng wdh Sect,on 7000 ot Otv,s.on 3 ot t!MI Business and ProtesSK>ns Cade) Of that ,sex empl therefrom and the basis tor the allegea enmpttoo Ant vt01att0n o1 sect,on 7031.5 by an appl,cant lor a permII sub )tels 1ne appbcanl to a c1v,I ~lty ol not more than hve hun Ored Oollars ($500) t, as owner ot the property or my employees wtth wages as their sole compensation, will do the wOl'k al'l<I the suuc- ture 1s not intended or offered for sale (Sec 70U Business and ProtesSKN\~ Code The Con1racIor s Llt'ense law does not apply 10 an owner of ptoperty who builds or lffiP(OYes lhet'ton and whO does such wo,k tillT\Seft or through tus own emotoyees, p,ovtded that socti ,mpfCwements are not mlend· ed or offered lor sale It hoi#ever. !he buLkMg or trnprove men I 1s sold w1thm one year ot tompIeI1on. the owner-bu1Jde1 wtU have the buroen ot prCMng that he did not bu1lcl or im- p<ovt tor the purpose of sale) 1. as owner of lhe prcperty, am exctus,ve)y contracting with hcenSed contractors 10 construct the protect (Sec 7044 Business and ProlesSOlS Code The ConIracIor·s lteense law ooes no1 iPP'Y 10 an owner of properly whO btnlds or ,m- proves thereon and who contracts tor eacn pro,ects Wflh a contractor(s) hcense pursuanl lo lhe Contractor s ltc:ense Law) I As• homeowner I im lfflj)<OVlng my home anO Ille follow "19 c.ondsliOns exist t The work ,s t>e,ng per1onnet1 pnor to sale 2 I have hved ,n my heme tor twelve monlhs poor 10 completion ol this work I have not claimed lh•s exemphon dunng the lasl three years O t am exempt unoer Sec • . a & P C tor this reason ____________ _ 0 1 hereby alhrm that I have a ce,11fica1e of consen1 to sell•1nsure. Of a cerlIhca.1e of Workers Compensation In- surance or a eer11l1ed copy thereof \Sec: 3800. Labor Codel POLICY NO c;o~P?6Q\ P<. <:J_Sll tJ-a,..7 ~ Co~ ··fil~ with r1' c11y • ...._. Cewt,ed copy Is hereby furnished CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE (Th,s section need not be compteted 1f the permit Is for one hundred dollars ($100) or lf'SS) D I certify lh.at in the performance of the wOl'k for which ttus permit 1s issued. I shall not employ .any person In any m.anner so as to become subject to the WOl'kers Compen- salton Laws of C.ahfornia NOTICE TO APPLICANT. 11. after making this Cerlllicate ol bemption you should beeome subjecl lo the Workers Compensation p,ov,SJons ot 1ne Labof Code. you mus1 lorll'hNtlh comply w,th sucn provisions o, ttus permit Shill be deemed ,evoked 0 I hereby alfirm that 1here Is a construction lending agency tor the performance of the wM IOf wtuch lh•s oer· m1t 1s issued (Sec. 3097. C,vtl Code) Lende(s Name Lende(s Address __________ _ USE BALL POINT PEN ONLY & PRESS HARD APPLICANT TO FILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AND DECLARATIONS. JOB AODRESS CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 Las Palrnas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009-1915 (619) 438-1161 APPLICATION & PERMIT BUSINESS LICENSE • VALUATION PERMIT NUMBER /~TJ -8'2 0WE£/BJ;,e ~Hor;;;2°c-I DATE OF APPL~CATI01 0LOT BLOCK I SUBDIVISION I ASS~SOR PARCEL NO ,,,.L / ,,,/l -/J b{/7~ <.J,-, oz:. CONTRACTOR eJ~V\ell' /5~'?-11 CONTRACTORS PHONE • ZONE ~f/tJS-7/ OWNER'S NAME -• OWNER 'S PHONE ~~o....-. 1; .... .-\-en.or-('"'\L'ts ,J"' .C 4 313'"-'-f'c;r" OWNER'S '-'A•Ll"G ADDRESS CONTRACToR·s ADDRESS STATE LICENSE NO BUILDING SO. FOOT AGE 2-"2..50 t 4oO FL4.~e2.. \ ~~L"' ~k~(t,d. Cf ~a=-f DESIGNER ""2.2-SO :;: ~C!...h' DESIGNER s ADDRESS OESIGNER"S PHONE STATE LICENSE NO F p FLA ELEV NO EDU vO NO --- STi lES ( OCC LOAD FIRE SPR CENSUS TRACT PA~KI G SPACE RES UNITS GRADING PERMIT✓SSUE REDEVELOPMENT TYP7/ 27 AREA ~ al y D N 'D NB"" . y,, v0 N~ 1215 .,;, '"Q (\ Unksr ~h,n_t' Cmif,«J ""',--. QTY. PLUMBING PERMIT · ISSUE /f'I EACH FIXTURE TRAP .2.. [ EACH BUI LO ING SEWER /_ I EACHWATERHEATERANOORVENT 2 I EACH GAS SYSTEM l IO 4 OUTLETS EACH GAS SYSTEM~ OR MORE EACH INSTAL. ALTER, REPAIR WATER PIPE ~ I EACH VACUUM BREAKER QTY. 3 WATER SOFTNER EACH ROOF ORAIN ilNSIOEl l01Al PlUMBINC. ] ELECTRICAL PERMIT · ISSUE NEW CONST EA AMP SWl !IKR / (TO 1 PH 3 PH EXISI BLOG EA AMP SWT BKR 1 PH 3 PH REMO OH Al It R PER CIRCUII TEMPPOLE 700AMPS OVER 200 AMPS fEMP OCCUPANCY 130 DAYSI 7!5Sd II QTY. MECHANICAL ~Ffl · ISSUE 2_ TiNSTAll FU_llN--Jl}tff_iJ~)fff} 000 BTU ..-i'I _'\(j .f'\.S OVER 100,000 BTU B~MPRESSOR UP Hl.HiP 801LER/COM.f'{!.ESSO/&iWMi - METAL FlRffi._~~ . -~ §65"' _.,C. VENT FAN SING_!& i81'i"':.,,~(, ~t~ Z..T MEC~s!'.:~~s REI.Jl~~~! FURNACE HEATER //_ J DIU!fl"~NT TOT t.L MECHANICAL ~ :5,;:Jt.. QTY. I MOBILE HOME SETUP ht'J iJ'C CAR PORT AWNING GARAGE J 5 ';1,U SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER .:-=::r- PLAN CHECK TOTAL PLUMBING 001·810·00·00·8222 ELECTRICAL 00 l ·810·00·00·8223 MECHANICAL 00 l ·810·00·00·8224 MOBILEHOME 001·810·00·00·8225 SOLAR 001·810·00·00·8226 STRONG MOTION 880-519·92·33 1 // ss _ .. ] FIRE SPRIN~LERS 001·810·00·00·8227 PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 320·810·00·00·87 40 BRIDGE FEE ;i... 360·810·00·00·8740 PARK·IN·LIEU (AREA ) TIF 't.'0 X"2.. 312·810·00·00·8835 ] qr,, 0 LA COSTA TIF 311·810·00·00-8835 FMF ~ LICENSE TAX Bi'71'f/i:s10-oo-oo-a1s2 MF.E _J .t;_ (} I\ -Xd. tRS0·519·92·57 2 ,.. ,. ",::, ..., ,& ] CREDIT DEPOSIT • u / / ] 5 cit/..3 7 lOTAl ElEl.lRICAl ~5.~ TOTAl TOTALFEESPAYABLE;j'S~ j-ij I HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED APPLICATION ANO PERMIT" ANO 00 HEREBY Expirat,on Every perm,t 1nued by the Bu,l<11ng ON,c,al under the provisions of th,s CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE Code th"11 expire by hmit1t,on and become null and void II the bu,ld,ng or work DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE ANO CORRECT ANO I FURTHER CERTIFY ANO AGREE IF A PERMIT lh aulho,,zed by such perm,t 15 not commence<! w,fh,n 180 days from the date ot sucn ISSUED TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY COUNlY ANO STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING CO"' _m,t °' '1 the bu,ld,l or work lulhor,zed by such perm,t,. suspended or STRUCTION WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY ANO abanclOned at en time a tar the work '5 commenced tor 8 "O<I ot !80 da KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS. COSTS ANO!,p ICAN~SIGN TU E OWNER~ CONTRACTOR [J EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT ' • BY PHONE rJ * AN OSHA PERllll:T IS REQUIAEO FOfl EXCAVATIONS OVER 5· o·· DEEP ANO DEIIIIOUTIOH Ofl CONSTAUCTIOH OF STRUCT\IRE.S 0\/EA 3 STOAIES IN HEIGHT APPR:zi=~ DATE ,~#er ~ u:: >-;;; 0 a. E Q) I- I u 0 (!) c "' u a. a. <( I .:£ C a: 0 <I) <I) Q) <I) <I) <( I ~ .2 ai >- Q) u C "' C u:: C Q) Q) 0 0 0 Q) a. <I) C Q) .c ~ - ' " TYPE . DATE INSPECTOR I BUILDING •, FOUNDATION REINFORCED STEEL . 'I- MASONRY I GUNITE OR GROUT SUB FRAME D FLOOR D CEJ.l:JNG SHEATHING @'ROOF l:!rSHEAR 111.Z,)' .. , ~ FRAME u. /4 -~r ~ EXTERIOR LA TH . INSULATION ,. ,(I -<; INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL i,V' r-- ' PLUMBING D SEWER AND BUCO D"PUCO ,o,. ~,. ~ UNDERGROUND D WASTE D WATER \-,z,.\ r '""'-"-.. TOP OUT D WASTE D WATER ll-i~•W ~ TUB AND SHOWER PAN . GAS TEST D WATER HEATER D SOLAR WATER ELECTRICAL D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND D UFFER ROUGH ELECTRIC 11.1Kef .... " D ELECTRIC SERVICE D TEMPORARY D BONDING D POOL MECHANICAL D DUCT & PLEM., D REF. PIPING HEAT -AIR COND. SYSTEMS J/· I ,:yy{ ""'"'IN VENTILATING SYSTEMS - CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHEN ALL APPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPROVED. ------------. . FINAL PLUMBING ' ELECTRICAL rl'\ . ",.. MECHANICAL ~ \fl ' . \. . GAS I r ," ... "-.':' BUILDING J '\. SPECIAL CONDITIONS : . . - ' . -C,,E:.ggfJS, t FIELD INSPECTION RECORD REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR'S NOTES INSPECTION REQ IF INSPECTOR'S DATE CHECKED APPROVAL ' SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSP STRUCTURAL CONCRETE \ . . OVER 2000 PSI ' PRES TRESSED CONCRETE POST TENSIONED CONCRETE .. ,· tt"• ... FIELD WELDING HIGH STRENGTH -" --.. 1[ BOLTS SPECIAL MASONRY . ' ,1,-, -·, -. PILES CAISSONS ') ,' - ,~. ,_ . •" .. -. ~ . ---', y . ,.,., ~-. -r~ . . ' ~ -,. I .. •' ' \ ,, ' . ' r \ .. - ~ .. ' ' .• ,, ... 't\ • --. \. ' . . . :: .... . ~ " r I FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 08-0571 DATE: April 27, 1989 PROJECT NAME: ____ s_u_D_A_N_I_N_T_E_R_1o_R_r.._u_s_s_1_o_l'_• --------------::::::==-- ADDREss: _____ 1_4_3_0_a_n_d_l_4_3_2 _S_\_NE_·e_·T_B_R_I_A_R_C_I_R_C_L_E ____ ~,::..._~---=-. PROJECT NO.: _______ UNIT NUMBER: ______ _ TYPE OF UNIT: _ O_U_P_L_E_X_, _______ NUMBER OF UNITS: INSPECTED DATE ~--c:z-8 BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED t/ DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: _____________________________ ___,!._ __ _ Rev. 1186 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District NK: Planning GOLD: Fire FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 88-0571 DATE: April 27, 1989 PROJECT NAME: ____ S_U_D_A_N_I N_T_E_R_IO_R_M_IS_S_I_O_N _____________ _ ADDRESS: _____ 1_43_0_a_n_d_14_3_2_S_W_E_ET_B_R_IA_R_C_I R_C_L_E _________ _ PROJECT NO.: jj:. 2. E6. I t.f UNIT NUMBER: _______ PHASE NO.: ______ _ TYPE OF UNIT: _ U_lJ_P_L_t:._"-________ NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON:. ___ ---,-_;_ __________________________ _ CONTACTTELEPHONE:. __ ~_3_8_-_4_68_6 ________________________ _ ALL Ot:t'A T;,, ~rcTEO ~~ DATE 5/, Le.1 J INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED ' f INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE I BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS:--------------------------------- ----Rev. 1/86 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water Dlstrlc "REEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning GOLD: Fire FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 88-0571 DATE: Aprll 27, 1989 PROJECT NAME: ____ s_u_o_A_N_I_N_T_E_R_IO_R_M_IS_S_I_O_N _____________ _ ADDRESS: 1430 and 1432 SWEETBRIAR CIRCLE PROJECT NO.: _______ UNIT NUMBER: _______ PHASE NO.: _______ _ TYPE OF UNIT: _ O_U_P_L_E_X ________ NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON: ______________________________ _ CONTACTTELEPHONE: __ ,_3_8_-_46_8_6 ________________________ _ INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED ALL OEPAk TwlcNTS DATE BY: _________ _ INSPECTED: ____ _ INSPECTED DATE BY: _________ _ INSPECTED: Costa Real Municipal Water District COMMENTS: Engineering Oepactment (619) 438-3367 APPROVED __ _ DISAPPROVED __ _ APPROVED __ _ DISAPPROVED __ _ APPROVED __ _ DISAPPROVED __ _ FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 88-0571 DATE: April 27, 1989 PROJECT NAME: ____ S_U_D_A_N_I_N_T_E_R_I_O_R_M_I_S_S_I_O_N ______________ _ ADDRESS: _____ 1_4_3_0_n_d_1_'1_3_2_a_·w_E_E_·T_B_R_t_A_R_C_J_C_L_E _________ _ PROJECT NO.: ________ UNIT NUMBER: ________ PHASE NO.: _______ _ TYPE OF UNIT: _ o_u_P_L_E_X ________ NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON:. _______________________________ _ CONTACTTELEPHONE:. __ ll_l_S_-_ll_G_SG ________________________ _ All ... A, f ,l:t .j INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED Rev. 1186 WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utilities PINK: Planning~~) FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION PLAN CHECK NUMBER: 68-0571 DATE: _A_p_r_ll_27_,_19_8_9 __ PROJECT NAME: ____ S_U_D_A_N_IN_T_E_R_IO_R __ ~_IS_S_I_O_N _____________ _ ADDRESS: 1430 and 1432 S lcETBRIAR CIRCLE PROJECT NO.: ________ UNIT NUMBER: ________ PHASE NO.: TYPE OF UNIT: _O_U_P_L_E_X ________ NUMBER OF UNITS: CONTACT PERSON:, _______________________________ _ CONTACTTELEPHONE: __ li_l _B_-_4_G_OG ________________________ _ INSPECTED ~ DATE ~~1APPROVED ✓ BY: INSPECTED: DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: ---------------------------------- Rev. 1/86 _,;--~ WHITE: Suspense BLUE: Water District GREEN: Engineering CANARY: Utiliti~ GOLD: Fire ~ffiffi~(Q)~ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CA. UC. NO. 315716 1944 Commercial St. P.O. Box 1748 Escondido, Callfornla 92025 (619) ·747-3478 City of Car I sbad Bui I ding Department Carlsbad, CA 92008 August 18, 1988 Ref: Plan Check• 88-0570 & 88-0571 Addresses: 1426, 1428, 1430 & 1432 Sweetbriar Circle Per the attached grading report dated 7/31/88 by John Vernon and Associates the alternate slab reinforcements for •3 rebar@ 24" on center both ways Is 6 x 6 x 10 guage welded wire mesh in al I slabs . This alternate method is to be used . Thank you Jor your help . PS:cs Enclosure \.....-'...,__.,..,C,O_N_:_T_R..,UC~ CP--, C. Seely ( August 16, 1988 SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION Attn: Herb Jones 1400 Flame Tree Ln. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Grading and footing certification Site: Laurel Tree Ln., Carlsbad To whom it may concern: JOHN VERNON & ASSOCIATES 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 TEL. (619) 743-8808 JOHN E. VERNON, PRESIDENT ACE 21121, GE 858 CHUCK DAVIS, VICE PRESIDENT ACE 21719 FRED BRONSON, CHIEF OF SURVEYS LS 5085 ----- This is to verify that I have reviewed the footing excavations at the above referenced site in Carlsbad and hereby certify that the foundation excavations, farmings and reinforcements are in substantial conformance with the approved plans and soils report dated July 31, 1988. l6f6- RCE 21121, GE 858 Exp. 9 /30/89 PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERS, INC. ENGINEERING • SOILS TESTING • SURVEYING SEWER PERMIT APPLICATION Development Processing Services Division 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 APPLICANT TO FILL IN SHADED AREA L/ ,,- BUILD! NG ADDRESS: _Y_cl_f,_--'--/_4'---,--"---~-"-c;--'--t _4_i ;.:..r ....:.. ,-'-',r('--'-- CASHIER'S VALIDATION SEWER PERMIT NUMBER: _S=-=E=----=--=2---=-, ...;.] _____ _ BUILDING TYPE: _.:..=...;.-----=f_l ----=..:.x ________ _ NUMBER OF EDU'S: --=--'/'-'-f-....:\...:"")c....a.=J.....:.._ ______ _ OWNER: _ 4 l_\_•-~~~~~~------------'~'=-•...,.\_J.'---.,.~( CA LC ULA TIONS: • I f I) MAILING ADDRESS: _l~ic..=.~.....c.......:.f_l_, -"'~L~J~r-_l._L=-_L_V\--'-- l > ~ > ~ /'t CONTRACTOR: lJ , ; Id (' , MAILING ADDRESS: _½-'--.. _L_....:.f __ • ----"(_=------'--r---'-c.. __ L--=-... \ • I J •d A I o--l I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: -~-<;~-'--'-"'~"\'-:..:f-"------'----'-~=------CONNECTION FEE I I 6 • L t T t COST PER UNIT I '"" ,-/ x --'----UNITS =---- LATERAL CHARGE: ______________ _ TOTAL CHARGES: -1l &~0 UC<) ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: _l_l .;:._)_-_C_'-t_{)_-----=2_:....=-~-=---- IA PREPARED BY: ---.------=---=-=------- (PRINTED NAME) COMMENTS: WHITE: DPS GREEN: Finance CANARY: Waler PINK: Building GOLD: Applicant ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-14-68 DATE : 81Ji!,/J.j7' ~ /7J'f' JURISDICTION: <!,,!TY iJ;C 4/tl2LSA8£2 · PLAN CHECKER QFILE COPY QUPS uDESIGNER PLAN CHECK NO: 8£-057/ SET: 7)Z; PROJECT ADDRESS: /'/ ~D -I 'IS;, £4!£er -6&1:1e (!..112-CL& PROJECT NAME: _ _.,./J~t.l.A=-~~-lf~,i.___ ___________ _ □ ■ □ 0 D D • □ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building .codes when minor deficien- cies identified · are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: ------------- Date contacted: ---------Telephone# --------- REMARKS: },/,FUfAPPltCli&tr CL€8RIY sttowof.) B,AIJ TIJ.l+T W,H--t,S¢LA& I S1Dell6e'. Tf¾l/J(.S P/ATft>flnf £e8tt»1,Jt'r IS t nr ,StJ,PP¢&Te:Q d Y Tf;Jl.:$.$ES WArt.-&-- Hf8TEt f MPUOCt SUJ>~RTEO ~ 'f 1JiR.n/ST1Jor AJ/tll y 'IVl:J BEll(JJ. $70£/'.1:t: VIJK,Su..lPMifEJ> filf STMrjJ....Jl)Et,J e.oom WPLL ,/. ~lllE:U /w u:,. WALL, SEE RfD P(IJ(IL tnft&,1<5, S#T. .:2 I By: ~ ~ ESG~~ CORPORATION 1/~/J'J' Enclosures: __ 1-JO-t-J-E ______ _ ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 ·.. SA.~ DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56(>-1+68 DATE: ) IU r AS l?Pf l J URISDICTION: (Z,1zr !),E f18£lS68LJ PLAN CHECK NO: -..:a.i'-"-f_· =05:.....<,,.j7/.__ _____ S;;..,;.E....cT_:-::::~=1TiT_,_ __ _ PROJECT ADDRESS :/9'..£> -1f/3J'Stµf.ETM,tJ:Je, t? /R"'Lri • PROJECT NAME: __ __..U.=?l,A.....___t~~~/ ___________ _ D D D • D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified-,--~----,--~----,----=~--are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ·,. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information . The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. ■ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: HERJ3£RI ✓av1as /'loo f:bft mez@e t..tJ, ■ Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. O Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: ------------- Date contacted: _________ Telephone# ________ _ REMARKS: -----------------------,-------- By:~d l,,J,L)µ✓ ESGIL CORPORATION ?-/f Enclosures: __ J,),""'-"~~J)~€.._ ______ _ i".lSOlCllON: l'J+RLS6BO Date 2l;s/iR ~ 7 ).)(CT ADDR(SS : /'13D-/l./3i?, -$W!:{TM)8'R-CtP, HFit.foe T , / ovgs PLAN CDRRCCTJON SHEET m: - ·□REWORD: PLEAS£ READ ~1an checlc is limited to technical requirements =ontained in the Unirorm Building Code, Unirorm >ll.fflbing Code, Unirorm Mechanical C~de, National :leetrical Code and state los regu.iating energy :onservation, noise attenuation and access for :.he handicapped. The plan check ia baaed on :egulations enrorced by the Building Inspection )epartment. You may have other correction• ;ased on laws and ordinances enforced by the 'laMing Department, Engineering Department or ;ther departments. '"he items circled below need clarification, ~odification or change. All circled items have :o be satisfied before the plans will be in =onforaiance with-the cited codes and regulations.1------1!.Li!li.'4~...J.L/J:.LJ.t..J:.....c;.J..J._.LJ.c:...-J-~=ta::.....L.:..L.-----t 'er Sec. ,o, (c), of the Uniform Building Code, -he approval or the plans does not per111it the :iolation or any state, county or city law • . ~ .) Please make all cor:ections on the original tracings and ·submit two nr:,, sets or prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the Jurisdiction, to: 64>'1:!L tlNYI 9,:µo C'~eH!f' l(R. #,bR ) To facilitate rechecking. please identify, neat to each circled item, the :lheet of tho plans upon which each correction on this sheet h:u been ,ude and return this chec~ sheet with the revised plans. 0 The following items have not been resolved from previous plan reviews. The original correction nunber has been given for your reference. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. O~h pl-.,,~ rec:e.ived by pl~ che~-~41/h:' :>1 h .:IJJ;;:_ plan check c01nple tcd zl,?~P.r 31. €11.ee,J @U(E:P: •• I I ESGIL_ CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE-DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (6 I 9) 560-I 4-68 / DATE: / .) u, I)[; rR D, !9ff J URrloICTION: faN CHECK NO: □APPLICANT RISDICTION df os-21 SET: / PROJECT ADDRESS : / t./ 3()-/d 2 1, 5 c.,.J !; E1 p/:.1 f: r.:. LAN CHECKER QFILE COPY QUPS QDESIGNER PROJECT NAME: ___ o_u~t~U~/._. _____________ _ □ D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified-=-----=-----------=-=---are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have signiticant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. ■ The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: IIE/u,egT It\ l}t;f s /(/(J D FLl9mE Tte,EE L LJ. . O Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. fll Esgil staff did been completed. advise applicant that the plan check has Person ontacted: H/£f--{-,£'/?"i -·0 /.J €.5 -17,~~ Date contacted: & d-Telephone # 'i?i'fl-'/IP R(z REMARKS: --------------------------- . ·;·; LJ ·, By • -. '/ U...1 -~ ...,, "' .. • ..--,_. .. ~ / • ..1 ESGIL CORPORATION 2) -/(/•)I,< Enclosures: __ ~,.(J"-='O=/)=c~------- , JR I so KT J°ON: 1 f f Sc f-[; .'~OJECT ADORE ss :/ y 3D 4 I 11 3 ;L ..sw ,-: f7 fl . f (.. ::-:: J :. __ __,_H ........ /;__.(_;/::.....,_~,J;;R ... T,__-~· C,'-'/-'J~::::.-...::S;...._ _____ _ j</00 l~(f ,,Y;:;" ~f:!:l::LU. PLAN CORRECTION S~£ET · • Ch~ck No . ? f ' ")5 7 / TC _an, ~ •-__,......_.._ __ .;;--=.....,._ ...... .,..J.,.L.,..,..__,-____ _ FOREWORD: PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Unirorm Building Code, Unirorm Plumbing Code, Unirorm Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and atate laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is baaed on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other correctiona based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items circled below need clarification, modification or change. All circled items have to be satisried before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. ,a, (c), of the lklifor11 Building Code, 1-----t~~JJ:.Jt..;;;..:..;....;..:.~......:;..:.i;.....:..,._=-..__ ....................... ..__..___.,,__...._...._; the approval of the plans does not permit the violation or any state, county or city law. ~. PLANS 0 Please make all cor:ections on the original tracings and submit two new sets or prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the Jurisdiction, to: ESG,n. (!J,£p. 9 3M D Cllc sffEfKE /JR. J!:t ,;?.o,Y :) To rac:il.it■tc rec:hc:~king, plca:u: identify, next to eoch circled itc:m, the sheet or the plans upon which each correction on this sheet h~s been m~de and return this chc:c~ ~cct with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. O•t• plan~ received by plan ched<er!,/;t// ?? -. Date ;J,,.1.-._ plan chec:lc c:0111pleted /,c /;; o /,-.,.;> B .,.. J / ' 'I. C I/ ft I ) !,, p ~ t...,' 1---,; • Es.GIL CORPORATION -9320 CHES,\PE.\KE DR .. SL'ITE 208 SA."i DI EGO. C.\ 02 l 2.J (6 I~) 56<)-I •68 DATE: 13,19(?? JURISDICTION : CITY OF CARLSBAD PLAN CHECK NO: Bf tJ5?J SET: I PROJECT ADD RES s : . I:/.¾!-11/3.:2 S tJJE~ Ti e.1 te t1 /ff Cl£ PROJECT NA.'1.E: □ D □ ■ The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building coces . The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified~---=--------=--=------are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is the jurisdiction's copy for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp.·until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. □ The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. ■ □ • The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: fl£Rf,£/?.T JOLJ€S l'-IDo Et.802C: Te£€ t,LJ. Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did been completed. Date contacted: REMARKS : advise applicant that the plan check ha01 -~ Person contacted: J.l,£eBt;t;, -lOIJE.5 -Q1 S /IV> [8 'A Telephone t L/3?-i/(e !:.,~ ' I -------------------------- BY: ~ Whv ESGIL CORPORATION s,s,?f ENCL: DE(),,SEgJ), SHE/:C PUJI ClD!CI 1'0: _ _.-;.Q ..... f._-..::D=.5:a-.--1/',.._/ _____ _ JtJRISDICI:1011: CITY OF CI.RLSMD !liCLOSORES: ______________ _ PROJJCr AmR!SS: / '-/ 3D -/i/3 :L ,s WE:GTU! ee C...tf2t(f; FLOOR ARU:_~¢i_,_,.2~S:...::O;__--'-i .... 3:..L? __ _ sn:IUBS: ______ ___..__ ________ _ BEI<m: _________________ _ Rl!KABS: ----------------- -- Date plans received by jurisdiction: s~-?? Date plans received by Esgil Corporation: ~,s-,~ Date initial plan check completed: 5-/3-fi' By: £/life) WBLM't7L Applicant contact person: H. J4ue2 Telephone: 'BR-r~~ Plan check is limited to techni c.al requi:-eme.nt.s contained in the Uniform Bui l ding Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Unifom !-iechanic.al Code, National :Electric.al Code and state la-·s regulating energy conser\'ation, noise attenuation and access for the handic.apped. 'llle plan check i s based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following IIIOdel codes: 1985 UBC (eff, 7/31/87) 1985 UPC (eff. 3/30/87) 1987 NEC (eff. 10/28/87) 1985 UMC (eff. 8/28/87) 'llle above regulations construction, regardless adopted by ordinance. apply to residential of the code editions Dle circled items listed need clarification, IIIOdification or change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans vill be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303(c)1 1985 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city lav. To speed up the recheck process, note on this list (or a copy} were each correction item has been addressed i.e., plan sheet, specification, etc. !e sure to enclose the marked up list vhen you submit the revised plans. JIO'ms PM.I JDmlRS AD Jl1? Ill SiiQUiNCI AS PAGD IIAVDIG II) lDNS KDDDG OtiU:tJLIIS wm DlllD"ID- List Mo. 631 Carlsbad Single Family Dlorelling and Duplax.With All Supplements. (1985 UBC) J i. I !· i f l Pl ease make all corrections on the original t.rac ings and submit t1JO ne.,.. sets of prints, and any original plan sets tr.at. may ha,·e been ret.u..-ned to you by the jurisdiction, t o: tsgil Co:-po:ration, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Si.:ite 1'208, San Diego, California 92123, (&19) 500-11.os. Please r.:iaY.e all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: The juri sdiction's building department. Indicate on the Iitle Sheet of the plans, the name of the legal owner and name of person responsible for the preparation of the plans. Section 302(a)7. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). Specify on the Iitle Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of this project including dwelling, garage, carport, patio, deck and balcony. Section 302(c). Provide a statement on the Iitle Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Iitle 24 and 1985 UBC, UMC and UPC and 1987 NEC. Submit fully dimensioned plot plan dra1.n to scale showing location, si~e, and use of all existing and proposed structures on the lot. Identify property lines and show lot dimensions and all easements. Shov location of all cut or fill slopes. Shov finish floor elevations and shov elevations of adjacent finish grade. Shov drainage patterns with mini.mum slopes. Section 302(c). - Indicate distance proposed building. from property Section 302(c). lines to 12/16/87 0 1· /s. Sho.,.· on the title sheet all structu:-es, poo'ls , walls, etc. i ncluded under tr.is application. Any portion of the project sho-n on the site plan t.1-i.at i s not included •·i:.h the buileing permit application fi led should be clearly identified as "not included." Clearly sho1.• if the lo...,er leYel is a basement or a story, based on the definitions i n Sections 403 and 420. Plot the finish g:-ade (as defined) on the ele,·ations and dimension the distance to the floor above, for st.cry determination. feet t.o property lines construction, have no 30 inch parapets when exceeds 1,000 square Walls closer than 3 shall be one-hour rated openings, and shall have the building floor area feet on any floor. (Table 5-A, Section 1709 (a)). Projections, including eaves, may not extend more than 12 inches into the 3 foot setback from the property line. Eaves over required windo.,.•s shall be not less than 30 inches from the side and rear property lines. Section 1710 and Section 504 (a) and (b). Plastic skylights shall not be installed within 8' of an exterior 1,·all located where openings in such exterior "'all are prohibited or required to be protected. Section 5207 (a) 7 . Projections, including eaves, shall be one- hour fire-resistive construction, heavy timber or of noncombustible material if they project into the 3' setback area from the property line. Section 1710. Show location of permanently wired smoke detector, cent.rally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms or above stair if sleeping rooms are on upper level. Section 1210. A smoke detector shall be installed in the basement of dwelling units having a stairway which opens from the basement into the dwelling. Such detector shall be coMected to a sounding device or other detector to provide an alarm which will be audible in the sleeping area. Section 1210. When the valuation of a room addition exceeds $1,000, or when sleeping rooms are created, smoke detectors shall be provided at existing bedrooms per item 16 above. 2 /,. The r.~>:ir.r..ll!l slope for a fire ret.arcant built- up :-oo!, .,..it.n r o:::k or g:-avel surfaci ng , is 3 inches i n 12 i n:::hes. Secti on 3203 (e ) 2. r i7. I ;,8. ~ if. +· 4. fa. The rni nioum s lope !or a f i re r etardant built- up :-oof , , .. :::.h cap sheet s urfacing, is 1/2 inch in 12 inches . Sect ion 3203 (e) 3. Specify cinimu:n 1/4 inch per !oot r oof slope f or d:-ain.age or design t o support aCC)Jllllllat ed water. Section 3207 (a), Section 2305 (f) and Section 2511 (d) 6. Sh9.w r oof drains and overflows. Section 3207. l'P.DVJDJ! [)eTFtlL. f..ffEP..CJJC£01'D Pt.fill• Pro,·ide skylight details to show compl iance wi th Sections 3401 and 5207 or provide I.C.B.O. appr o,·al number . Plastic skyli ghts must be separated from each other by at least 4 f eet. Section 5207 (a) 6. Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area or 1/300 of attic area if at lea.st 50% of the required vent is at lea.st 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents. Show required area and area provided. Secti on 3205 (c). Provide fireplace cons~ction details or note construction to be per attached fireplace standard drawing. Chapter 37. Show anchored veneer support and coMections attached to wood in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, comply with Section 3006 (d)l and Section 2515 {a). Show ties and #9 wire in hori zontal joints. Show height and construction details of all masonry walls. Chapter 24. Note that cleanout openings shall be provided at the bottom of all cells to be grout filled in accordance with Table 24-G. Cleanouts shall be sealed before grouting, after inspection. Show floor and roof coMections to masonry walls. CoMection shall resi st 200 pounds per lineal foot or the actual design load, whichever is greater. Cross grain tensio[l or bending in wood ledgers is not permitted. - Section 2310 & 2312 (j)3A. Provide details for dacp proofing the foundation walls, below finish grade, where usable space exists on the interior side of the walls. Section 1707 (d). 12/16/87 t· Show a mi nl..l!l'.llll 2" air space and f l ashing between pl anter and building wal:s . Sec tion 2516 (c) 7. GARAGE AND CARPORTS f::\ Garage requires one-hour f i:-e protect i on on V the garase si de of wa lls and cei l ing common to the d1o•el ling. !able 5-B, Section 503 (d). h -DD L -rD KDD f-.Sll&MHII.Y-t 7f· Al l element s supporting f l oor above garage , including ,,;all s supporti ng floor joists, must have one-hour fire-r esi stive protection on the garage side. Sect i on 503 (b) 71· f· I· /s · r· .0 Show l 3/8" solid core self-closing door for openings between garage and dwell ing. Section 503 (d). Garages are not pe:nni tted to open into a room used for sleeping purposes. Section 1104. An occupancy separation is not required between carport and residence, provided the carport is open on two or more sides and ha.s no enclosed uses above. Section 503 (a) Exception 3. Show garage framing sections, size of header over garage opening, lateral cross bracing at plate line, method bracing garage front and holddowns if required. Chapter 23. NOTE: Maximum shear panel ratio is 3 1/2 to l for height-to-width. Table 25-I. Doors may open into the garage only if the floor or landing in the garage is not more than one inch lower than the door threshold. Section 3304 (h). Provide an 1811 raised platform for any FAU, water heater, or other device in the garage which may generate a flame or spark. UHC Section 508, UPC Section 1310 (a). POOJmAnOR IWJU.uw,DaS Per soils report, note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allovable bear~ value. Section 2905 ( c). ftlcSO Pllbut~£ J~lolf79 ~~,~ Pie ld/l.1. 501,!, EAJ!t. -n,uor£ J.JUAJS£ e-1/. l)Mrdl.l .s,w. lhe foundation plan does not comply with the soils report recommendations for this project. Please review the report and modify design, notes and details AS required to show compliance: H 3 '3M:$ ~ ;.'(• o,e, n,tt WA 'r ,~ $t.A6,S, s ~-- r· sf. ~ Provide no~es on :.he foundation plan l:sting t..~e soils report reconz:nendation for foundations, slab a..~d building pad preparation. Pro,·i de a letter froni t.he soils engineer confi:.r.::.ng tl"..!lt :he foundation plan, grad::.ng plan and spec::.ficatior:s have been reYie.,,•ed and that it hAs been dete:"lllined that t.he recommendations in :he s oi;s report are properly incorpora~ed into t.he const:,,iction docU/llents ( .,,.hen requi red by t.he soil report ). The soils report recomendations excavations be reviewed by soils engineer. Note on t.he foundation plan that "Prior to t.he contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, t.he soils engineer shAll advise t.he building official in .,,Titing that: I I 0 Ihe building pad •,:as prepared in accordance 1.-it.h the soils report, Ihe utility trenches ha,•e been properly backfilled and compacted, and Ihe foundation exe&vations, fomings and reinforcements comply ,dth the soils report and appro'l"ed plan." Show height of all foundation walls. 23. Chapter Show height of retained earth on all foundation walls. Olapter 23. If cut or fill slopes exist, show distance of foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes and shw steepness and heights of cuts and fills. Olapter 29. Note on plans that wood shall be 611 minimum above finish grade. Section 2907 (a). Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern and key elevations. On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet to a drainage device a minimum of 1211 plus 2 percent. Section 2905 (f), 2907 (d) 5. Dimension foundation per U.B.C. Table 29A: Floors [ooting SUQQOrted* Stem...-all Width w!,h Thickness 1 6" 1211 1211 6" 2 8" 1S11 1811 7" 3 10" 18" 21+" 8" '''Foundations may support a roof in addition to the floors. Where only a roof is supported, use foundation for one floor. 12 16 87 t· j· Show foundation sil :s to be pressure treated , or equal. Section 2~16 (c ) 3. Show foundation belt si:e and spacing. Section 2907 (f ). Spec::.fy si:e, I .C.B.O. nU/llber a.nd r.anufacturer of po.,,•er dr::. ven pins. She.,,. edge and end distances and spacing. Section 302 (c). If required by structural calculations, show si:e, imbedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 2312 (f), 302 (c). If hold downs a:e note on plan that tied in place prior Section 305 (e) l. required by calculations, hold down anchors must be to foundation inspection. Show adequate footings under all 'bearing walls and shear walls. Section 2907 (b). Show on the plans stepped footings for slopes steeper than 1:10. Section 2907 (c). Show minimum 18" clearance from grade to bottom of floor joists and minl.JIIUID 1211 clearance to bottom of girders. Section 2516 (c) 2. Show pier size, spacing and depth undisturbed soil. Table 29-A. into Show minimum underfloor access of 1811 x 2411• Section 2516 (c). Show mini.mum underfloor ventilation equal to 1 sq. ft. for each 150 sq. ft. of underfloor area. Openings shall be a.s close to corners as practicable and shall provide cross ventilation on at lea.st two approximately opposite sides. Section 2516 (c) 6. Specify that posts embedded in concrete shall be pressure treated per 1JBC Std. No. 25-12. Section 2516 (c) 1. 1'RAKJJG (,':::'\ Show wall bracing. Every exterior ..,ood stud ~ ..,all and main cross partition shall be braced at each end at least every 25 feet of length with 1 x I+ diagonal let-in braces or equivalent. Section 2517 (g) 3. Note cross bridging or blocking. Floor joists and rafters 1211 or more in depth shall be supported laterally by bridging at intervals not exceedi ng 8 feet, unless both edges are held inline. Sec. 2506 (h), 2S17 (a) 6. 6 10/. Sho~ clocking at encs and at suppor~s of floor 1/''. joists, rafters and t::-usses at exterior ~alls. Section 2517 (d) 3, 2517 {h) 6. Sho-· double joists. floor joists shall be doubl ed under bearing partitions :,.inning parallel •·ith the joists. Section 2517 {d) 5. Bea.ring partiti ons, perpendicular to joists, shall not be offset from supporting girders, be.AIils, ~alls or partitions, more than the depth of the joist. Section 2517 (d) 5. Show rafter ties. Rafter ties shall be spaced not more than 4 feet on center and be just above the ceiling joists, where rafters and ceiling joists are not parallel. Section 2517 (h) 4. 1/,. Show rafte.r purlin braces to be not less than 45 degrees to the horizontal. 1/a. Section 2517 (h) 5. Show 1/2" minimum clearance between top plate of interior partitions and bottom chord of trusses. (To ensure loading will be as designed). g Show double top plate with minlJIIUIII 48" lap splice. Section 2517 (g) 2. 1,h. ShO'w' nailing "'ill be in compliance with Table r 25-Q. 8 Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 2516 (f): 0 12/16/87 In concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and floor levels and at 10 foot intervals along the length of the wall; at all intercoMections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces such a.s occur at soffits, drop ceilings and cove ceilings; In concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the run and between studs along and inline with the run of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished; and in openings around vents, pipes, ducts, chimneys, fireplaces and similar openings which afford a passage for fire at ceiling and floor levels, with noncombustible materials. 1t. Sho.· stud s i :.e and spacing. l'.axi.JirJm allo.·able stud hei~hts: Bearing ~all: 2 x4 and 2 x 6 max. 10'; Non-bearing: 2 x 4 inax. 14', 2 x 6 lll&X. 20'. Table 25-R-3. Studs supporting two ceil ing must be 3 x 4 Tabl e 25-R-3. floors, a roof and or 2 x 6 at 16" o.c . 1!4. Note on A.I.T.C. Certi ficate of Compliance for / glued laroinated wood members shall be given to the building inspector pri or to installation. Section 306 (f). ,(,";\ Detail all post-to-beam and post-to-footing V COMections and reference the detail to the plan. Section 2516 (m). Q Detail shea.r transfer coMections, including \::Y roof and floor diaphragms, to shear "·alls. Section 2513. t:::\ Specify nail size and spacing for all shear V walls, floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Maintain IIIAXlJIIUIII diaphragm dimension ratios. [Tables 25 I, J, Kand Section 4713 (d)]. 1"3. Show 311 x 411 or 211 x 6" studs in first story of three story building. Table 25-R-3. ~ Provide truss details and truss calculations V for this project. Specify truss identification ~~s~on th•,,nJ• f1~11ss ~-~~ 'T~£$ u,A~ V . li!J.UJ,,, 1_, 1!h . .,,,,~ ,4 ~,S.Lle£-.JS ',l DFinr • 110. Provide roo ramine plan an oor framing plan. Section 302 {c). 1f1• Provide framing sections through Section 302 (c). t::::\ Specify all header sizes for opening over i.• ~ wide. Section 2517 (g) 5. lt3. Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and post footings. Section 302 (b). Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. Section 302 (b). 7 Sho.,,· •on the pl ans developed in t.~e Section 302 (c). end.) a~l structural requirements structural calculations. (See corrrnents below or at :)6. ColUl:ITls and posts l ocated on concrete or f' masonry floors or decks exposed to the Yeather or to ~ater splash or in basements And which support pe:nnanent structu:-es shall be supported by concrete piers or cetal pedestals projecting above floors unless approved wood of natural resistar1ce to decay or treat&d ;,,ood ::.s used. Section 2516 (c) 4 . ~ Ind~,·id~l concrete or masonry piers shall J proJect at least 8 inc.hes above exposed ground unless the columns or posts which they support are of approved wood of natural resist.Ance to decay or treated wood is used. Section 2516 (c) 4. 1-k. Show loc:.ation of attic access ..,ith minimum size 7w 2211 x 30". Section 3205. Show draft separation for attic areas between units in a duplex. Section 2516 {f). 8F'fW~l:l.l u I.Irr~ urr$+ $10U.6( -ULJt-rf. • 6,~lr(-rE. Specify plywood grade and panel identification index. !able 25-N. 1p. When roof pitch is less than 3:121 design ridge as a beam. Section 2517 {h). ¥_32. If foundation cripple ..,all studs are less than 1411 high, framing shall be solid blocking. Section 2517 (g) 4. Cripple wall studs exceeding 4 feet in height &hall be 3 inch by 4 inch or 2 inches by 6 inches when supporting 2 stories. Section 2517 {g) 4. Show plywood sheathing over exposed eaves, or other weather exposed areas, is exterior grade. Section 2516 (i). 1js. Shov a weep screed at the foundation plate line on all exterior stud walls to be stuccoed. Section 4706 (e). '-:::\ Detail truss layout for 'j{.: x ~~ attic access, V i.f req~i,::~d for equii>inent in the attic. R&.!:.O Utt.C!) .Ju,r,H 11Jt, rHE ~fllt11Jt,. . 13',. Ridges, hips1 and valleys shall be at least-one size larger than supported rafters. Section 2517 (h) 3. 1}s. In open beam construction, provide strap ties across the beams at the ridge support. Section 2501 (b). 12/16/87 All heating, ventilating, and cooling systems and appliances shall comply .,,-ith the Unifo:-m Mech4ni cal Code. Sho.,,• the si::e, location and type of heating and cooling appliances or systems. all Show source of combustion air to Chapter 6, UHC. furnace, per Every dwelling unit shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70 degrees F. at 3 feet above the floor in All habitable rooms. Show basis !or compliance. UBC, Sec. 1211. 1/2. Show minl.lDUIII 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of furnace. Section SOS, UHC. f.::::\ Note on plans, "clearances to be per V manufacturer's listing." Section 5041 UHC. ija. Furnace shall not be installed in any bedroom, bathroom or in a closet or confined space ,dth access only through such room unless specified as direct vent appliance, enclosed furnace or electric heating appliance. Section 704 UHC. Show I.C.B.O. fireplace. approval number for prefab Show access to the attic or underfloor furnace to be minimum 30 inches by 30 inches. Section 708 & 709 UHC. Note that passageway to the attic furnace &hall be unobstructed and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide. Section 708 UHC. Show permanent electrical outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch for the attic furnace. Section 708 UHC. 1,j9. Show details to comply with Section 709 for furnace under the floor, or Section 710 for roof or outside furnace. t· Note on plan: Gas vents and non-combustible piping, in walls, passing through three floors or less shall be effectively draft stopped at each floor or ceilini. UBC, Section 1706 (a) 6. Provide dryer vent to 1903. outside. UMC 1 Section 8 All ... ·iring shal l comp ly ... ·ith the Natiol'llll Electrical Ce>de. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical serdce, the location of the sen·ice panel and the location of any sub-panels. Show location of all electrical receptacles. Electrical receptacle locations and/or spacing i s not adequate in, _____________ _ r::-:\ Show at least one convenience outlet other than V outlets for laundry, etc., outdoors, in garages and basements. ?-.'EC, Art. 210-52. t::\ Note con,•enience outlets in bathrooms, kitchen V counter top(s) \.'ithin 6 feet of the kitchen sink I outdoors, and in garages and basements (other than for laundry and similar equipment) shall be GFI protected. NEC, Art. 210-8. 117. Note electrical system ground to be provided / per ?-.'EC, Art. 250-81. PLIMBDC (tmPORK PLil(BIJC <XlDE) 1/8. Show "''ater heater size, type and location on plans. UPC, Section 1301. Show source for providing combustion air to fuel burning water heater. If wall openings in an enclosure are used, at least one-half of the required opening area shall extend into the upper twelve inches of the enclosure and one- half within the lower t1,1elve inches. UPC, Section 1307. Fuel combustion water installed in bath or opening into bath or 1309. heater shall not be bedroom or in a closet bedroom. UPC, Section 1,1. Provide adequate barrier to protect water heater from vehicle damage. UPC, Section 1310. 112, Show I and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 1007 (e). Note on the plan that hose bibbs and lawn sprinkler systea shall have approved backflow prevention devices. UPC, Section 1003{h) & (i). 12 16 87 f· Show sho..,•er st.all can acco111DOda~e a 30" circle and has a minimum floor area of 1,024 sq. in. UPC 909 {d). ~lSE IRSlJUJIOR (IXJPLEX!S) lEI, Show details of duplex com:non (party) walls /-· and floor/ceiling assemblies to achieve a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating in walls of 50 decibels and an Impact Insulation Class (IlC) rating on floor/ceiling of 50 decibels. Title 25. n Show how penetrations of assemblies for ~ piping, electrical devices, recessed cabinets, bathtubs, soffits, or heating Yentilating, or exhaust ducts shall be sealed, lined, or 'insulated to 111aintain required sound transmission rating. Title 25. ~ Provide insulation in "''alls and ceiling to V achieve STC of 50 bet...,een garage and living area if garage use is not controlled by resident. Title 25. State regulations (California Admin. Code) require that the design satisfy one of tha attached alternative energy packages or submit calculations. 'lha law also requires that many mandatory conservation items be satisfied. t::::\ On the title sheet of the plans, provide a C.J sunaary of the design features for this project (i.e., R-values, gluing, shading devices, thermal mass, HVAC efficiencies, etc.). 1 /4. Show on the plans the "R" value for the walls, 7· floors, ceiling and related areas. ,,;::,.,·Show double glazing as per Energy Design, on '<:;J Glazing Schedule. ./1. Show on the plan how shading requirements are ;· satisfied. ~ Show on the plans the thermal mass areas as V indicated in the energy documentation. 9 r::\ Ih~ pl ans a.re not ::.n compliance ,,:i th the energy V consen·ation coCJj:'::.ance package selected or design calculatior.s provided. Sho"' on plans confo=ice as f o1)o-.·s: 11f. PLftµs ,ssow t;"l-ec..-r-g ,c. wnre tttre~",:_ C!Rt cs . ,,A,$ fJ..l!V> .Stf:&J/12">4, (A(.(!,, /;l'tl rD I Dle glazing a.re.a on the plans exceeds that shown i n the documentation or allowed in the package selected. Gluing area includes rough openings of "'indo"'s and the full size of french doors. Specify on the building plans all of the mandatory energy conservation requirements as listed on the enclosure titled, "Mandator-v Energy Conservation Requirements". Show the make, l!IOdel and space heating (or cooling) heat loss calculations if 45,000 'BnJ/Hr. efficiency of the system and provide the output exceeds For room additions, show that the gluing area. of the addition does not exceed 16% of the ne..,ly-conditioned floor area, plus glazing removed or relocated due to the addition. CARLSBAD S.F.D. & OOPLEX SIJPPL»Dlfr 11/a. Energy conservation design should be for Zone 7 • See attached energy packages. rr. Floor drains must have auto-prime (city policy). ~ Note exhaust fans cannot be ductless type (city 'CJ policy). New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" 'Where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). Note "two 3/1+" copper pipes DaJSt be installed to the most con,·enient future solar panel location 'When the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093), All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated 'When in area.s that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (city policy). f I_ ; 12/17/87 ,1, .. Incorporate the "'aterproofing details, on the r attached Policy 80-8, where intuior li,·ing space occurs below grade at the masonry ..,.all(s). ~ Show on the V information Developmental !i t l e Sheet on the plans, the required by the attached Sel:"'·ices Sheet 112.383. All new ~esidential additions, require a submit two copies. buildings, including soils report. Please Heavy timber framing, minimum 611 x 1011 beams and minimum 811 x 8" post, for the structural beam and column supporting the fire i.eparation beo,.,een the garage and living area above, is acceptable if sho\o'tl on the plans. (city policy). 118. UBC Adopting Ordinance 8792. requires fire i' Retardant roof on all st.ructures (Sec. 18.04.2.30). Shov compliance with UBC Section 3203(e). t.::\City Ordinance 9792 requires tvo parking Vspaces/unit vith clear area of 2.0'x20' i.e. no washing machines, etc. Show compliance. 1.fo. Please see additional corrections, or remarks, 1\) on the following page. 'lhe City of Carlsbad h&s contracted vith Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92.12.3; telephone number of 619/560-11+68, to perform the plan check for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan check items, please contact. _______ _ Iii L/;EJJ Wffll{a, at Esgil Corporation. If you have any questions regarding City Building permit procedures, please contact Carter Darnell at the City of Carlsbad, 12.00 Elm Avenue, telephone 619/1+38-1161, 'lhanlt you. F.nclosures: 1. 3. 10 DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES BUILOING OEPA.RTMENT (itp of ~ar(i&ab 1200 ELM AVENUE CAA~O. CA 92008-1Mt (111') '31-~ THE INFORMATION LISTED BELOW MUST BE SHOWN ON THE TITLE SHEET OF THE PLANS FOR YOUR S'INGLE FAMILY DWELLING Site Address /legal Description ""'Assessor's Parcel Number /4uantity of Gradi~g in cu.bic yards Contact Person -Name and daytime Phone Number /c1rcle any Planning Connission or City Council Action on thfs Property: Variance, CorJ;litfonal_ Use Permit, Tract or Parcel Map, Zone Change, Planned Development, Redevelopment Permit, Development Plan Speci fie Plan, · Site PLAN CHECK NUMBER 8~ ()5 71 cd 112383 Da'tei5IB/fi ' ¾j CITY OF CARLSBAD Prepared bys ,f. b.J&J<F;TL VALUAT!0N AND PLAN CH!CK ~EE PLAN c~cx No. 8R-Q5Zt o :Sl<!g, Dep't, □ Esgil BUILDING ADDRESS 1'(3D-li?u£ ,< (IJ€Uf2&/ftl; C.tfCl€ APPL!CANT/CONTACT Jt€y,egr JQ6)E.S PHONE NO. 'i,$cP-f'•fw BUILDING OCCUPANCY R-~ /Jtrl DES!GNE:R PHONE _____ _ TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VJ/ CONTRACTOR PHONE ____ _ 3UILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE MUlT!PLIER hbOJJ::" Y f}p,::; J . . ti.,.,..,, i< I) ti.I I• ,i -/,""' /,<.,,,-Q,j9, fJtJRt'.H , , .. 4 -.. I' ... a-J) .Pr6 ~ ,· I I Air Conditionin« Commercial @ Residential fa Res. or Comm. -- Fi.re S'Crinklers @ Total Value /.."7~ Q~9. , Buildinr.j per. it r .. s_· ___________________ s.__· .. 8 ... 2~.:S:-...,.__.S,_,_D __ Plan C hec:k r ee-.:S~-----------------~S_ef~...::'-/ ..... 3~, .::::0;..:8':.-.._ ...... _ .. ·-:: .... ,~ , C 0 H Ht N TS'----------------------------.-, . . -:i.f~} Plans received by Esgil after July 31, 1987 shall have permit and · ·' :· plan check fees calculated per 1985 UBC. SHEET __ /.___OF / • 12/87 ' CJ CJ "ti "ti Ill Ill ,: ,: .2! Ill > > Ill Ill °' °' ~ □ □ Nlf( □ ~□ ~ □ □ ~ □ □ ~ □ □ 3' □ p~ □ $ "' Q CJ "ti Ill ,: Ill ·;;: Ill °' □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ □ ENGINEERING CHECKLIST Date: 5(19/88 I ; Plan Check No. ~8~8~6~5'"-'-7.1-'/ ____ _ Project Address: /-'130-/¥.32-~er@:A?l'.lte Project Name: £),;fl,f)<-0UDIW~ /11tSJt~,, Field Check Date: =:=-=----------B : LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan LEGEND 7 @ 1,2,3 Item Complete Item Incomplete -Needs Your Action Number in circle indicates plancheck number that deficiency was identified 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. 2. Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway and percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. 3. Provide legal description of property. l!. Provide assessor's parcel number. PERMITS REQUIRED Grading 5. Grading permit required. (Separate submittal to Engineering' Department required for Grading Permit). 6. Grading plans in plan check PE ____ _ 7. Need the following completed prior to building permit issuance: A. Grading plans signed. B. Grading permit issued. C. Grading completed. D. Certification letter and compaction reports submitted. E. Grading inspected and permit signed off by City Inspector. 8. Right-of-Way Permit required for work in public right-of-way (e.g., driveway approach, sidewalk, connection to water main, etc). 9. Industrial Waste Permit application required. To be filled out completely and returned to Development Processing. ' .2l "' 0 aJ -0 Q) ;: Q) > Q) 0:: ~ "" u c.. Q) Q) ...... "' "' 0 0 aJ -0 Q) ;: -~ > Q) 0:: N "" u c.. aJ -0 Q) ;: Q) "> Q) 0:: "' "" u c.. □ □ □ □□□ PLANNING CHECKLIST Plan Check No. Address Type of Project and Use J)J(:1£:X, Zone Use Allowed? YES Setback: Front OK: Side OIL Rear OK -- Facilities Management Zone 2.0 School District: San Dieguito __ Carlsbad ~ Discretionary Action Required YES ~ Environmental Required YES --12(_ Landscape Plan Required YES --K- Comments -- Encinitas San Marcos NO NO NO NO Type C£jJO CTBo-f-'f ------------------------------ Coastal Permit Required YES NO Additional Comments " • □ D D □ □ □ □ FEES REQUIRED 10. Park-in-Lieu fees required. Quadrant: _____ ,, Fee Per Unit: ____ , Total Fee: ___ _ 11. Traffic impact f_iie re~ired. .-#0 L()ee... Fee Per Unit: lf''-ft!i) -, Total Fee: ,e,c., 717 12. Bridge and Th.9roughfare fee required,_, ..,:, Fee Per Unit: ff tf-2!./ , Total Fee: rr-8'(-8 ,_.. 13. Public facilities fee required. 111. Facilities management fee required. Fee: 2Y'.} /4 I 15. Additional EDU's required: 2. 0 a2-a 9 Sewer connection fee: ____.2QcO .-Sewer permit no. 16. Sewer lateral requirif:'oV_....:~:::JY..:,=="'------- REMARKS: __________________________ _ 0. K. to issuy:::f:S_L..,.2~-~"''=====--=====:.-Date: ~//E/E;B --=/.,_,_-"7--'-'"--"''-------- If you have any questions about any of the above items identified on this plan check, please call the Development Processing Department at 1138-1161. February 8 , 1988 Sudan Interior Mission 1400 Flame Tree Ln. Carlsbad, CA 92008 ' • JOHN VERNON & ASSOCIATES 1859 S. ESCONDIDO BLVD. ESCONDIDO, CA 92025 TEL. (619) 743-8808 PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION To whom it may concern: This is t o verify that I have checked foundation soil conditions for lots as shown on attached sketch to update the preliminary soils report dated 12/03/79 by Southern California Testing Labs. An erosion cavity exists around the drop-inlet and downdrain at the NW corner of the proposed site. The cavity should be backfilled properly with native material before footings are cast. No other changes have occured and all other aspects of the proposed construction should be completed in accordance with the prior soils r eport. We are recommending two #4 bars top and two bottom in all footings and #3 bars@ 24" on center each way in all slabs, as minimum reinfbrcement. We will be ~vailable for prejob conference and certification testing at notification when the grading work is scheduled, and at the time footing excavations are made. GINEEAING • SOILS TESTING• SURVEYING '· \ ' RELATIVE COMPACTION T~~r, R!f?81~~ CONTRACTOR: 7,-[~,,. JOHN VE Rt-JON 8 AS SOC. PROPERTY 0£VELOPM£NT fN81H££RS ~ S. ESCONOIOO BLVO..ESCOHOIOO, CA 92025 74'5·8808 DATE: Z.-/" .... ~7 TESTED BY LOCATION= I Ts. 11 tz.. 1 /~if kif'~ .. --.. _-~ r~r .SAND VOLUME DATA= ··-=.~ .. ·., ____ ·_.:_·:·~;t'??c-;,/!J INITIAL WEIGHT OF SAND Yv£1GHT OF RESIDUE WEIGHT OF SAND USED SAND DENSITY VOL. OF HOLE 8 CONE VOL. OF CONE VOL. OF HOLE EXCAVATED SAMPLE= WET WEIGHT DRY WEIGHT WEIGHT OF WATER % MOISTURE ~-__ ,.,,;._~: IN PLACE ~ GR /~cf7 LB 47~ GR ~~ GR ~ TESTit/ FG -/ OG +/ Exp. 9/30/89 /¢,& LB ~~9 LB /?j:;j~ LB p.$ LB/cF ,/27 CF .,~4' CF , ~?z' CF OPT. MOtSTLRE 5~ GR 46:J_ GR 40 GR 9 IN PLACE WET DENSITY t.J PLACE DRY DENSITY //~~ LB/cF IMPACT TEST DATA= OPTIMUM WET DENSITY OPTIMUM ~STURE % OPTIMUM DRY DENSITY ·RELATIVE COMPACTION= /~ LB/CF /~ LB/CF "7 ..,..__ __ /(5 LB/q 195 %1 ' . , • l 1111 l ,, • • • - PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION r11SSION EXPANSION OFF LAUREL TREE ROAD CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION PosT OFFICE Box 1398 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, !NC, 6230 RIVERDALE STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA (' ( 1j7T fifo1 I ' .. • , SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, I N C. ,6280 l'ltVERDALE ST-SAN 01cao, CALIF", 92120 • TELE 2B0·4321 • P.O. BOX 20627 SAN DrEao, CALIF", 92120 74·831 VELIE WAY PALM DEIIERT, 678 ENTERPRISE ST, EB CONDI DC, December 3, 1979 Sudan Interior Mission Post Office Box 1398 Car)sbad, California 92008 C A L I F', 9 2 2 6 D TELE 346·1D78 C A L I F', 9 2 D 2 5 • T E L E 7 4 6 • 4 S 4 4 SCS&T 13530 Report flo. 1 SUBJECT: Report of Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for the Proposed , Mission Expansion off of Laurel Tree Road, Carlsbad, California. , • I Gentlemen: In accordance with your request we have investigation for the proposed project. and recommendations. completed a preliminary geotechnical We are presenting herein our findings The findings of this study indicate that the site is suitable for the proposed development provided the reconmendations presented in the attached report are complied with. We did, however, find the upper 2 to 3 feet of native topsoil to be expansive in nature, and make recommendations regarding this condition in the body of this report. The site can be considered relatively free of geologic hazards. If your have any questions after reviewing the findings and recommendations contained in the attached report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL ANO TESTING, I N C. • • • .. • • - • SCS&T 13530 December 3, 1979 Page Two This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. ~t.~ Anthony.8;,;:st, Project Engineer Charles H. Christian; R.C.E. # 22330 AFB:CHC:mw c(:: (2) Submitted (4) Miller Engineering (1) SCS&T, Escondido SOUTHERN CALIF"ORNIA SOIL ANO TESTING, INC. • . . • • • ' .. , • • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. Introduction and Project Description .............•....•.•............. ! Project Scope ..................•....................•....•...•........ l Findings ..............•...•.•................•..•..................... 2 Site Description •................••.......••...••........•..•.••. 2 Geology and Subsurface Conditions ............•..••.............•. 3 Soil Conditions ....•........•.•.•....•..•••...............•. 3 Geologic Setting ............................................ 4 Tectonic Setting ............................................ 4 Geologic Hazards ...................................•............ 4 Groundwater ................................................. 5 · Recommendations .....................•............•.................... 6 Site Preparation ....•....................•...•.•.....•........... 6 General ..................................................... 6 Expansive Characteristics ................................... 6 Earthwork ..........•........................................ 6 Foundations ....................................•................. 7 General ..................................................... 7 Lateral Resistance .......................................... 7 Settlement Characteristics .................................. 7 Slope Stability .............•.........................•..•....... 8 Limitations ................•..•...................•................... 8 Field Explorations ...................... J ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 9 Laboratory Testing .......................•..............•............. 9 ATTACHMENTS PLATE rm. Site Vicinity Map ..................•...........................•...... l Trench Locations Map .................................................. 2 Soi l Types .....................•.•..................•....•...........• 3 Trench Logs ...............•......•............•.•.....••.......••..... 4-8 Direct Shear Test Results ............................................. 9 Recommended Grading Specifications & Special Provisions ............... Appendices Unified Soil Classification Chart ..................................... Appendices ···-~-----·-·····-···-·-· •• . . • • I , • • PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDY PROPOSED SUDAN INTERIOR MISSION EXPANSION CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION This report presents the results of our preliminary geotechnical investi- gation for the proposed Sudan Interior Mission expansion to be located off of Laurel Tree Road in Carlsbad, California. A brief legal description of the site is Lot G, Rancho Agua Hedionda, City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, Sate of California. It is our understanding that twelve, one story, duplex units with slab-on-grade construction are planned for the site. It is further understood that a considerable amount of grading consisting of both cuts and fills on the order of 20 feet will be necessary to develop the site. A vicinity map showing the site location is provided on Plate No. l, and the site configuration and exploration locations are shown on Plate No . 2. PROJECT SCOPE This investigation consisted of: surface reconnaissance; subsurface explorations; obtaining representative disturbed and undisturbed samples; laboratory testing; analysis of the field and laboratory data; research of available geological literature pertaining to the site; and preparation of this report. The analysis of our findings was intended to: a) Determine the nature and pertinent physical properties of the on-site soils, including their bearing capacities, expansive potential and settlement characteristics. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. ·-----~------·----····- , I ' • .. , ' • .. SCS&T 13530 lJece111ber 3, 1979 b) [)efine the general geology of the site including c) possible geologic hazards that may affect site development. Develop gu·idel ines for site grading and provide design information regarding the stabrlity of cut and fill slopes. d) Provide recommendations for foundation design. e) Determine potential construction di fficuHies and pro vi de recommendat i ans concerning these diffi cul ti es. FINDINGS Site Description Page Two The subject site is an irregular shaped parcel of land, approximately 13 acres in area, located on. the south face of the valley of Canyon de las Encinas near Carlsbad, California. Drainage of the site is to the north and is acco111plished by sheetwash and by a gulley in the western half of the site. Elevations range from approximately 220 feet (M.S.L.) to approxi111ately 120 feet (M.S.L.). The highest elevation is at the southwest portion of the proµerty where a level area is cut into the hillside . Below this cut area, the hillside slopes and an approximate 10% to 20% grade. Bordering the western property line is a near vertical cliff, dropping approximately 30 feet. An occupied residence exists on the cut area and is surrounded by a paved parking area. Access is provided by a driveway entering from Laurel Tree Road. The foot of the cut area below the pavement appears to contain a small amount of fill material consisting of local soils and some concrete chunks. Vegetation on the site consists prin1arily of grasses on the slopes surrounding this cut, and a few landscaping trees and shrubs near the residence. The cut area west of the paved parking area contains no vegetation . SOUTHERN CALIF"□RNIA SOIL AND TESTING. INC. • • • • • .. • • - • SCS&T 13530 December 3, 1979 Page ThrPe Geology and Subsurface Conditions Soil Conditions: The soils of the project were found to consist of two to three feet of brown, loose to dense, clayey sand, underlain by fon11ational sedimentary soils that consist of yellow brown, very dense, poorly sorted sand. A review of the Soil Survey of the San Diego Area, California, U.S. Department of Agriculture, December, 1973, indicates the topsoils within the project area to be of the following types: Soil Phase Dial>lo clay, 1530% Gaviota fine loan, 9-30% slopes La Flores loamy fine sand, 9-15% slopes Crop Suitability (Part II, Table 2 (U.S.D.A.) Avocado, Citrus, Truck crops, and Flowers: not suitable. Tomatoes: fair non arable Avocado, Citrus, Truck crops, and Tomatoes: not suitable Flowers: fair Uses (Part I, pp. 43, 50, 60 U.S.D.A.) Range, Tomatoes, Housing, Pasture Range, Watershed, Small Housing Development Fl owe rs, Range, Housing Development The approximate boundaries of the above topsoil types that are found in the proposed development area, as delineated on the soil maps of the Soil Survey of San Diego Area, California, and the conditions as found in our field work are shown on Plate No. 3 of this report. The southwest portion of the site that is in cut was found to be void of any topsoil. In view of the above uses outlined by the U.S. Department of Agriculture survey, the soils of the site appear to be well suited for the proposed development. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. "" ---------"""~--- • • • • • '. • • - • SCS& f 13530 December· 3, 1979 Page Four Slopes in the sui.Jject area that lacked vegetation cover were observed to be highly susceptible to erosion, especially when steep cuts existed into formational soils. No severe erosion problems were observed on moderate slopes that were covered w; th grasses. Erosion of the s 1 opes that a re proposed for the subject deve 1 opment should be adequately contra 11 ed if a deep-rooted, drought resistant vegetation is maintained on the slopes. Gcoloyic Setting: lhe subject site is located in the Coastal Plains Physiographic Province of San Diego County and in underlain by Eocene Sedi111entary deposits of the Santiago Formation. At the subject site the Santiago Forn1dtion was found to consist of yellow-brown, very dense, poorly cemented, poorly graded, medium-grained sandstone . Tectonic Setting: A review of available geologic maps indicates the subject site to be located approximately 4.5 miles east of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone. The Hose Canyon Fault Zone is a series of northwest trending faults of Quaternary age that is currently classified as potentially active, rather than active. This classification is based on the lack of conclusive evidence to verify Holocene movement along tliis fault zone. No fault traces have been mapped through, or i1rn11ediately adjacent to, the subject site, and examination of our exploration trenches and a surface reconnaissance yielded no evidence of faulting at the site. It should be recognized that much of Souther11 California is characterized by major, active fault zones that could possibly affect the subject site. The nearest of these is the Elsinore Fault Zone, located approximately 25 miles to the northeast, and the San Jacinto Fault Zone, located approximately 47 miles to the northeast. Geologic Hazards The sui.Jject site is located in an area which is relatively free of potential geologic hazards. The most likely geologic hazard to affect the site is ground shaking as a result of movement along the major, SOUTHERN CALIF"□RNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. • • •• , • • - • • - • SCS&T 13530 December 3, 1979 Page Five active fault zones mentioned above. Based on a 111aximui11 prob ab 1 e earthquake of 7 .3 magnitude along the Elsinore Fault Zone, or a maximum probable earthquake of 7.8 along the San Jacinto Fault Zone, the 111axi111um ground acceleration at the site could be as high as 0.21 g. There is also a remote possibility that movement could occur along the Rose Canyon Fault Zone during the life of the proposed structures. Based on a maximum probable earthquake of 6.0 magnitude along the Rose Canyon Fault, 111axi111um ground acceleration at the site could be on the order of 0.41 g. However, in view current classification of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone, we are of the opinion that is should nrt be used as the ''design earthquake'' fault for structures such as those proposed for the subject development. Construction in accordance with the minimum standards of the most recent edition of the Uniforni Cluilding Code should minimize potential damage due to seismic activity. Other potential geologic hazards such as tsunamis, selches, liquefaction, or landsliding should be considered negligible or nonexistant. Groundwater: No groundwater was encountered during our subsurface exp·loration and we do not anticipate any major groundwater related problems, either during or after construction. However, it should be recognized that minor groundwater seepage problems may occur after development of a site even where none were present before development. These are usually minor phenomena and are often the result of an alteration of the permeability character·istics of the soil, an alteration in drainage patterns and an increase in irrigation water. Based on the penneability characteristics of the soil and the anticipated useage of the development, it is our opinion that any seepage problems which may occur will be minor in extent. It is further our opinion that these problems can be most effectively corrected on an individual basis if and when they develop. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. -----------~--· t I • - • • • • • SCS&T 13530 1Jecc111bc1· 3, 1979 Page Six RECOMMENDATIONS Site Preparation General: Portions of the site were found to contain one to two feet of loose topsoils. ror all areas to receive fill, beneath all areas to be paved, and the area within 5 feet beyond the perimeter of the proposed structures, loose topsoils should be removed to firn1 natural ground and be replaced as an engineered fill. Firm natural ground is defined as soil that has an in-p.lace density of at least 85% of its maximum dry density. Expansive Characteristics: Approximately two to three feet of expansive topsoil was found to exist on portions of tile site. In order to a 11 ow the use of conventional foundation systems, all expansive soils that will occur within 2.5 feet of fin·ished grade should be removed and be replaced with nonexpansive soil during the grading operations. Wherever expansive soils are used in fill, they should be placed a minimum of 2.5 feet below proposed finished pad grade. The minimum horizontal extent of this recommendation should include the area within a perimeter of 5 feet outside each proposed structure. If the expansive soils are not removed as reconnnended above, a specially designed foundation system will be necessary. Such a foundation system should be determined after the grading of each lot has been completed and the ex tent of expansive soils can be determined, Earthwork: All earthwork and grading contemplated for site preparation should be accomplished in accordance with the attached Recommended Grading Specifications and Special Provisions. All speci~l site preparation reco111111endat ions presented in the sections above wi 11 supersede those in the standard Recommended Grading Specifications. All embankments, structural fill and fill should be compacted to a minimum of 90%. Utility trench backfill within 5 feet of the proposed structures and SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. ··----·•-··-•#•~·-------- • " • • • • • • SCS&T 13530 December 3, 1979 Page Seven beneath asphalt pavements should be compacted to a minimum of 90'X. of "its 111axi111u111 dry density. The maximum dry density of each soil type should be detennined in accordance with A.S.T.M. Test Method 1557-70T, Method A or C . Foundations General: Conventional spread footings founded in nonexpansive soil, are recommended for tl1e support of the proposed structure. Conventional spread footings should be founded a minimum of 12 inches below the lowest adjacent finish grade for one story structures and should have a minimum width of 12 inches. Spread footings may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot. Adjacent footings founded at different bearing levels should be so located that the slope from bearing level to bearing level is flatter than one horizontal to one vertical. It is reco1111nended that footings not be founded nearer than five feet measured horizontally inward from the face of the existing slope. Lateral Resistance: Resistance to lateral loads may be provided by friction at the base of the footing and by passive pressure against the adjacent soi 1. For concrete footings on compacted soil, a coefficient of friction of 0,40 may be used. For calculating passive pressure, and equivalent fluid unit weight of 238 pounds per cubic foot may be used. Passive pressure should not exceed 2400 pounds per square foot. When combining frictional and passive resistance, the latter should be reduced by one-third . Settlement Characteristics: The anticipated total and/or differential settlements for the proposed structure may be considered to be within tolerable limits provided the recommendations presented in this report are followed . SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL ANO TESTING, INC. -------·-·-··. • .. , • ' • • - - SCS&T 13530 December 3, 1979 Slope Stability The cut and fill slopes constructed from the native on-site materials will be stable with relation to deep-seated failures if constructed at or flatter than the fo 11 owing reconm1ended s 1 ope ratios expressed in horizontal to vertical units for the indicated heights: Cut Slopes to 35 Feet in Height: 2: 1 Fi 11 Slopes to 35 Feet in Height: 2: 1 Page Eight The above maximum heights were detenni ned by using a factor of safety of 1.5. It is also recommended that footings not be founded nearer than five feet measured horizontally inward from the face of the slopes. Slopes should be planted with erosion resisting plants and natural drainage should be directed away from the top of all slopes. Ice plants shoulu not be used on fi 11 s 1 opes. LIMITATIONS The recomnendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the project requirenEnts based on an evaluation of the subsurface soil conditions encountered at the subsurface exploration locations and the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from those encountered. It should be recognized that the performance of the foundation and/or cut and fill slopes may be influenced by undisclosed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that may occur in the intennediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this report that may be encountered during site development should be brought to the attention of the soils engineer so that he may make modi Fi cations if necessary. In addition, this office should be advised of any major changes in the project scope or proposed site SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. • .. • • • • • • .. - SCS&T 13530 December 3, 1979 Page Nine grading so that it may be detennined if additional investigation would be necessary. It should be recogn·ized that the work perfonned for this study was performed in accordance with the State-of-the-Art at the time of the study . FIELD EXPLORATIONS Five subsurface explorations were made at the locations indicated on the attached Plate Nwnber 1 on November 16, 1979. These explorations consisted of trenches-dug by means of a-backhoe. The field work was conducted under the observation of our engineering geology personnel . Th_e explorations were carefully logged when made. These logs are presented on the following Plate Number 4 through 8. The soils are described in accordance with the Unified Soils Classification System as illustrated on the attached simplified chart. In addition, a verbal textural description, the wet color, the apparent moisture and the density or consistency are given as either very 1 oose, 1 oose, medium dense, dense or very dense. The consistency of silts or clays are given as either very soft, soft, medium stiff, stiff, very stiff, or hard . Oisturbed anJ undisturbed samples of typical and representative soils were obtained and returned to the laboratory for testing . LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with the generally accepted Amer-ican Society for Testing and Materfols (A.S.T.M.) test methods or suggested procedures. A brief description of the tests performed is presented below: a) Moisture-Density: Field moisture content and dry density were deternlined for representative undisturbed sample obtained. This information was an aid to classification and penni tted SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. t • • l J . . • ) .. SCS&% 13530 December 3, 1979 Page Ten recognition of variations in material consistency with depth. The dry unit weight is determined in pounds per cubic foot, and the field moisture content is detennined as a percentage of the soil's dry weight. The results are summarized in the trench logs. b) Classification: Field classifications were verified in.the laboratory by visual examination. The final soil classifications are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. c) Direct Shear Tests: Direct shear tests were perfonned to determine the failure envelope based on yield shear strength. The shear box was designed to accomodate a sample having diameters of 2.375 inches or 2.50 inches and a height of 1.0 inch. Samples were tested at different vertical loads and at saturated moisture content. The shear stress was applied at a constant rate of strain of approximately 0.05 inches per minute. The results of these tests are presented on attached Plate No. 9 . d) Expansion Tests: The expansive potential of clayey soils was determined in accordance with one of the fo 11 owing test procedures and the results of these tests appear on Plate No. 9 . A 11 ow the trimmed, undisturbed or remo 1 ded samp 1 e to air dry to a constant moisture content, at a temperature of 100 degrees F. Place the dried sample in the consolidometer and allow to compress under a load of 150 psf. Allow moisture to contact the sample and measure its expansion from an air dried to saturated condition . SOUTHERN CALIF"□RNIA SOIL ANO TESTING, INC. • • , • ' .. • • - \ I \ . \ . \. \ ' I \ £.. 4 IV \ I .. ', \ \ \ _I l .. , ., I , ·. \ \ \ i \ '· I I ' '- \ \ ,r:_ 4 !Cl SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING , INC. ftllZOO RIVIERDALIE l!ITRIEIET BAN OIIEDD, CALIFORNIA lllll1RO J ·., -----. ·-·-- 33 . . • 1·-1// · '·\ · ,. \1'"·1 . ,I,. r. , • c..S::./a::I..U /1V7e.e..;~ -4(/SS/OW c.Au.e:.cL T,ce.c, LAA/C Cj1E.l 56.LlD .1 C.11..L/ r. • • • • • .. • • • · . !"/ / I I I '---j SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING-, INC. 9R80 RIVERDALE 8TREl!T IIAN Cll!OO, CALIFORNIA IIR1RD TRENC II LOC/\TIO NS BY I \ I I \~\ \~ ,~1 '1~' I I I I \~\ I I I ix' Ill.)' I I I I ' \ I \ \ I I I I I \ I Sudan Interior Mission Laurel Tree Lane Carl sbad, Californi a JC DATE • 11-20-79 JOB NO. 13530 Pl at e No . 2 } ' • I • • , • ., SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BOIL & TESTING , INC. ·••o ... ,v■ROAL■ eTOll ■■T ■AN Ol■GO, CALI .. Ol'IINIA ■■i■O SOI L TYPES BY Sudan Interior Mission Laurel Tree Lane Carl sbad, California AFB DATE 11-30-79 JOB NO. 13530 Pl ate No . 3 • .. .. 0 1 • 2 3 4 5 • 6 7 • 8 .. • • - • -------- ~ Tl~ENCH NUMBER ONE CL/\SS DESCRIPTION y M -•.. . St\ Rrown, Hurni d to Moi s t, Loose to Dense , Sl iyhtly Clayey , Silty Sand ' .. , 113. 3 6.9 , . ' . . . . . . .. SP Yellow Brown , Humid to Moist, ... Very Den se , Poorly Graded Sand .. . ... (Santiago Formation) .. .. 116.3 7.8 .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. ... ExcavaLion Difficult BOTTOM FOR LEGEND SEE PLATE NO. 8 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING., INC. ISRl!IO RIVERDALE ISTRF.ET BAN 011!00, CALIFORNIA 811180 Sudan Interior Mission Laurel Tree Lane Car lsbad, California BY Arn JOB NO. 13530 DATE 11-1 6-79 Plate No. 4 i ' I I I I I I . ! I • - • • • • • .. - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .. SP . . . TRENCH NUMl3ER TWO 13rown , ll u111itl t o Mois t, Loose Cl ayey Sand Yel low Brown, Mo i s t, Very Dense, Sil ty Sand (Silntiago For111ilt io11) Gray , Moi s t, Ve ry De11 se, Poor ly Gr aded $and Exca vation Di ffi cult 130TTOM y M 11 1. 4 9.5 rOR LEGE ND SEE PLATE NO. 8 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BOIL & TESTING ; INC. eaeo RIVER OAL E 8TRF.ET S A N 0 11£00, CALIF O R N IA IIIR1RO BY Sud an In ter ior Mission La urel Tree Lane Ca rl sbad, Cal i fornia Arn DATE 11-1 6-79 JOB NO. 13530 Pl ate No. 5 i I I ' I I ' I i I I ' I • •• • • • ,., • • 0 CLASS , . . . SP -... 2· ... . . . . TRENCH NUMBER THRE E DES CR I PT ION Loose Fill or Highly Di sturbed So il Gray, Moist, Very Dense, Poorly Graded Sand (Santiago Fonnation) 3...___,.__.__ _____________ _ [30TTOM FOR LEGEND SEE PLAT E NO. 8 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING·, INC. 8Rll0 RIVERDALE STREET SAN DIEDD, CALIFORNIA IIR1RO BY Sudan Interior Mission Lau rel Tree Lane Carlsbad, California AFB DATE ll-1 6-79 JOB NO. 13530 Pl ate No. 6 • • • , • • .. 4 5 --------------------- TRENC H NUMBER FOUR y SC Brown, Humid to Moi st, Loose to Med ·ium Dense, Cl ayey Sand 11 2.5 SP Gray, Moist, Very Dense , Poorly Graded Sand (Santiago Formation) M 14 .8 [sea vat ion Di ffi cult 6 -'---'--.L---------------BOTTOM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING-, INC. BRBO RIVERCAI.E BTREET BAN Cll!OC, CALIFORNIA llll1RD FOR LEGEND SEE PLATE NO. 8 Sudan Interior Mission Laurel Tree Lane Carlsbad, Californiu BY AFB DATE 11-1 6-79 JOB N0.1 3530 Plate No . 7 • • • • • • • .. .. TRENCH NUMBER FIVE SC Brown, Hu111id to Moist, Lo ose to Medium Dense , Clayey Sand y M 112.7 6.8 2 4 Dense SP Lavender to Tan, Moist, Very Dense, Poorly Graded Sand 114. 7 (Santiago Fonnation) 5.1---A----L----......;.---_..;.----- LEGEMD: Sa111r l e Loe at ion Natural Dry Density (pcf) y M Natura l Moisture Content(% of Y) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING -, INC, 1!UZ80 RIVERDALE l!tTREl!T IIAN C IEDC, CALll'CRNIA IIIZHIO BY Sudan In terior Mission Laurel Tree Lane Carlsbad, California AFB DATE 6. 1 11 -16-79 JOB NO. 13530 Plate No. 8 • . ' DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULT S Angle of Cohesion SAMPLE DESCRIPTION interna l interc:e pt friction ( 0 ) (ps f) T2@2Q Undisturbed 31 150 • T 4 @ 1 5 Undisturbed 30 700 - 'I EX PANS IO N TEST RESULTS , SAM PLE T 2 @ l O T 4 @ 0 ~ CONDITION Undi sturbed Undi s turbed Air-Dried /\ir-Dried INIT IA L M .C. ("lo ) 1.8 2. l • - INIT IAL DENSITY O:>CF ., 11. 4 112. 5 F INAL M.C. (~/o) 22 .6 25.7 -- NORM AL STRESS (PSF 150 150 EXPANS 1ON (0 /.) 9.6 15. 0 , • ... ' I ~ SOUTHERN CALIJ:ORNIA Sudan Interior Mission SOIL & TESTING LAB, INC. Laure l Tree Lane ftllBO RIVERDALE STRE ET Carl sbad, Cali f ornia BAN OIEOO, CALIFORNIA llli!11i!O t -.. BY. AFB DATE 12-3-79 JOB NO. 11q n Pl atP Nn. 9 • • • • • • • • • Appendix A, Page One December 3, 1979 SCS&T 13S30 RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS -GENERAL PROVISIONS GENERAL INTENT The intent of these specifications is to establish procedures for clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to be filled and placing and compacting fill soils to the lines and grades shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary soil investigation report and/or the attached Special Provisions are a part of the Recommended Grading Specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. INSPECTION AND TESTING A qualified soil engineer shall be employed to inspect and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications. It will be necessary that the soil engineer or his representa- tive provide adequate inspection so that he may certify that the work was or was not accomplished as specified. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the soil engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes and new information and data so that he may make these certifications. If, in the opinion of the soil engineer, substandard condi- tions are encountered, such as questionable soil, poor moisture content, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., he will be empowered to either stop construction until the conditions are remedied or corrected or recommend rejection of the work. Soil tests used to determine the degree of compaction will be performed in accordance with the following American • • • • • .. • • - • Appendix A, Page Two December 3, 1979 SCS&T 13530 Society for Testing and Materials test methods: Maximum Density & Optimum Moisture Content -A.S.T.M . D -1557 -70. Density of Soil In-Place -A.S.T.M. D -1556 -64. PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL All vegatation, _brush and debris shall be removed, piled and burned or otherwise disposed of. After clearing, the natural ground shall be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, brought to the proper moisture content, compacted and tested for the ·minimum density specified in the Special Provisions or the recommendation contained in the preliminary soil investigation report. When the slope of the natural ground receiving fill exceeds 20% (5 horizontal units to l vertical unit), the original ground shall be stepped or benched. Benches shall be cut to a firm competent soil condition. The lower bench shall be at least 10 feet wide and all other benches at least 6 feet wide. The horizontal portion of each bench shall be compacted prior to receiving fill as specified herein before for compacted natural ground. Ground slopes flatter than 20% shall be benched when considered necessary by the soil engineer . FILL MATERIAL Materials placed in the fill shall be approved by the soil engineer and shall be free of vegetable matter and other deleterious substances. Granular soil shall contain sufficient fine material to fil1 the voids. The definition and disposition of oversized rocks, expansive and/or detrimental soils are covered in the Special Provisions. Expansive soils, soils of poor gradation or strength characteristics may be thoroughly ) ) Appendix A, Page Three December 3, 1979 SCS&T 13530 mixed with other soils to provide satisfactory fill material, but only with the explicit consent of the soil engineer. PLACING AND COMPACTION OF FILL Approved fill material shall be placed in areas prepa:ed to receive fill in layers not to exceed 6 inches in compacted thickness. Each layer shall have a uniform moisture content in the range that will allow the compaction effort to be efficiently applied to achieve the specified degree of compaction. Each layer shall be uniformly compacted to a minimum specified density with adequately sized equipment, either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability. The minimum degree of compaction to be achieved is specified in ei'ther the Special Provisions or the recommendations contained in the prelimimary soil investigation report. Field tests and inspections to check the degree of compaction of the fill will be taken by the soil engineer or his representative. The location and frequency of the tests shall be at the soil engineer's discretion. In general, the density tests will be made at an interval not exceeding 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 500 cubic yards of embankment. SEASON LIMITS Fill shall not be placed during unfavorable weather conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy rain, filling operations shall not be resumed until the proper moisture content and density of the fill has been achieved. Damage resulting from weather shall be repaired before acceptance of work. • .. .. • • I • • Appendix A, Page Four December 3, 1979 SCS&T 13530 UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS In the event that conditions are encountered during the site preparations and construction that were not encountered during the preliminary soil investigation, Southern Cqlifornia Soil & Testing, Inc. assumes no responsibility for conditions encountered which differ from those conditions found and describeJ in the preliminary soil investigation. RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS SPECIAL PROVISIONS The minimum degree of compaction to be obtained in compacting natural ground, in the compacted fill, and in the compacted backfill shall be 90 percent. Detrimentally expansive soil is defined as soil which will swell more than 3 percent against a pressure of 150 pounds per square foot from a conclition of 90 percent of maximum clry density and optimum moisture content to saturation. Oversized fill material is defined as rocks or lumps over 6 i11ches in diameter. At least 40 percent of the fill soils shall pass through a No. 4 U.S. Standard Sieve. Transition Lots: Where transitions between cut and fill occur within the proposed building pad, the cut portion should Le undercut a minimum of one foot below the base of the proposetl footings and recompacted as structural backfill . 't. • • • • • • - - ..., ~-' . ' UNIFIED SOIL CLl,SSIFICATION CHART SOIL DESCRIPTION l. COARSE GRAINED, More than half of material is larger than No. 200 sieve'size. GROUP SYMBOL GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS GW More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 GP sieve size but smaller than 3". GRAVELS WITH FINES GM (Appreciable amount of fines) GC SANDS CLEAN SANDS More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve size. SANDS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) 11. FINE GRAINED, More than half of material is smaller than No. 200 sieve size. SIL'l'S AND CLAYS Liquid Limit less than 50 SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit greuter than 50 IIIGIILY ORGANIC SOILS " SW SP SM SC ML CL OL Mil CII OH PT TYPICAL NAMES Well graded gravels, gravel- sand mixtures, little or no fines. Poorly graded gravels, grav, sand mixtures, little or no fines. .. Silty gravels, poorly grade, gravel-sand-silt mixtures. Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, clay mixtures. Well graded sand,gravelly sands, little or no fines. Poorly graded sands,gravell sands, little or no fines. Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silt mixtures. Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sar, silt or clayey-silt-sand mixtures with slight plasl· icity Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity.gravelly clays, sandy clays.silty clays, lean clays. Organic silts and org,rnic silty clays of low plastici Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. Peat and other highly organic soils. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TESTING LABORATORY