Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2797 CREST DR; ; CB003437; Permit09-13-2007 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: Applicant: ASTORGA JOE City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB003437 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2797 CREST DR CBAD RESDNTL 1561524500 $371,087.50 6 1 4 Sub Type: SFD Lot #: 0 Construction Type: VN Reference #: Structure Type: SFD Bathrooms: 3.5 EUCALYPTUS CREST SFD 4146 SF, GAR 1008 SF, COV PORCH 1094 SF Owner: States: Appliei Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check*: 1786 ALTAVISTA DRIVE VI STAC A. 92084 760-758-2909 Building Permit Add! Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee HMP Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,573.08 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,022.50 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWAFee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $37.11 PFF (3105540) $0.00 PFF (4305540) $0.00 License Tax (3104193) $0.00 License Tax (4304193) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Housing Impact Fee ?? . Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $4,515.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $7,147.69 Total Fees:$7,147.69 Total Payments To Date:$1,022.50 Balance Due:$6,125.19 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1.2.-7T7 FOR OFFICE USE ONL PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit / Validated E Date frg, "PM 'l 18. /IT/ . Business Name (at this address)^' U7/ -->•''PRMT 1022=50 Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No. Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use CG\£.%AJU\. Proposed Usefood Description of WorkHew z 2. CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant) SO. FT.3(46 rutit, ' #of Stories # of Bedrooms4 CA # of Bathrooms Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #Fax # 3. APPLICANT O Contractor D Agent for Contractor . Q Owner Ejj| Agent for OwnerJoe Name 4. PROPERTY OWNER Address City State/Zip Telephone # Address City State/Zip TelephoneName 5. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name State License # Address City State/Zip Telephone 6. WORKERS'COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: l~l I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. (~1 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) l~l CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: O I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). W I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). O I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. l~l YES flNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? d YES d NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? d YES d NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? d YES d NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE Cjfr^, /^TSfff^Cf £\ DATE <7 WHITE: i YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance I *-3l 0. In ^Partnership with government for 'SuiCding Safety DATE: JANUARY 23, 2001 JURISDICTION: CARLSBAD a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3437/3439 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2797/2799 CREST DRIVE PROJECT NAME: 2-STORY SFD FOR MSK DEVELOPMENT GROUP The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: _.. .. Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: _____ Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: PLANS DISCARDED AT CITY'S REQUEST. JOB WITHDRAWN. By: KR Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D CM D EJ D PC trnsmtWot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ^ San Diego, California 92123 ^ (619)560-1468 ^ Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Tartners/iip Wit/I government for Quitting Safety DATE: 9/26/OO a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3437 & 39 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2797 & 99 Crest Dr. PROJECT NAME: Two Story SFD for MSK Development Group |~) The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. |~] The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: JoeAstorga 1786 AltaVista Dr., Vista, CA 92084 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Joe Astorga (V.M-) Telephone #: 760-758-2909 Date contacted: ^/ZG/cjfc (by:b^- ) Fax #: Mail *-*' Telephone^ Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Mark Beauchamp Enclosures: Esgil Corporation n GA n MB PI EJ n PC 9/19/00 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 *• Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-3437 & 39 9/26/OO PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3437 & 39 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2797 & 99 Crest Dr. FLOOR AREA: 3146 Dwelling 1008 Garage 1094 Covered Porch 1000 Bonus Room above garage REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 9/26/00 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/19/00 PLAN REVIEWER: Mark Beauchamp FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 00-3437 & 39 9/26/00 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 2. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) In any portion of a building wall enclosing bathtubs and showers where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. The window beside the tub in the master bath needs to be tempered. 3. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): a) Private stairways (1 tenant) need only have a handrail on one side if 30" or less in height, b) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. c) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. d) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. 4. Show a self-closer for the door between garage and dwelling. Section 302.4. 5. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Model name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. d) Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or UBC Table 31-B. Carlsbad 00-3437 & 39 9/26/00 e) Note on the plans that approved spark arresters shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. Q. Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. 7. Note on the plans that bathroom receptacle outlets shall be supplied by a minimum of one 20- ampere branch circuit. Such circuits shall have no other outlets. This circuit may serve more than one bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). 8. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms. 9. The size of header FH-3 is not shown on the plan. 10. The load path on Line 3, 6 and 8 appears to lack continuity from the roof to the foundation. Calculations for Line 3 from the show two shear walls but the plans only show one of the walls. Calculations for Line 6 from the roof show 8 feet of shear wall but none is shown on the plan. Calculations for Line 8 from the roof show 13 feet of shear wall but the plans show only 8 feet of shear wall. Hold downs are shown on the foundation plan for Line 3 but there are no shear walls shown for the first floor. 11. Detail the connection for the collar ties over the bonus room. Detail 28 on sheet SD1 does not show the connection of the collar tie to the rafter. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Mark Beauchamp at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. ..Carlsbad 00-3437 & 39 9/26/00 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: OO-3437 & 39 PREPARED BY: Mark Beauchamp DATE: 9/26/OO BUILDING ADDRESS: 2797 & 99 Crest Dr. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION Dwelling Garage Covered Porch bonus Room Air Conditioning rire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 3146 1008 1094 1000 4246 CB Valuation Multiplier 82.00 23.00 7.25 82.00 3.00 By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance ^ Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) < 257,972 23,184 7,932 82,000 12,738 383,826 1,615.08 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: 0 Repetitive Fee Repeats I Complete Review D Structural Only D Other D Hourly Esgil Plan Review Fee Comments: Two identical houses with variations in garage configuration. 1,049.80 1,049.80 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc City of Carlsbad Public Works — Engineering DATE: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB BUILDING ADDRESS: 3,737 C&&T PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A/fefJ 5p., ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: /56-/S"2_ -EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please see -£he attached report of deficiencies marked with/O/Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. Date: Date: Date: By: By: By: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUfLDING PERMIT: v ' Date: D D D D D D D D D D ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: David Rick City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Av, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2781 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 wc»D*©8&^)na>d^pUV*iein>u^ • (76O) 6O2-272O • FAX (760) 602-85625V. 9/3/97 I - BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST / 1ST 0ND ^RD / 1 <!. 3 service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation / services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. ED ED ED 12c- Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. n 13. Additional Comments: OH THIS TD Pftfcd£5f ? T frJIt-i- WA»T To Ffct-S H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuiMing Plancheck CHst form (Generic).doc ^ ~7 Rev. 7/14/00 City of Carlsbad Engineering Department Document Signature and Recordation Transmittal Datef Via: 1. Senior Civil Engineer 2. Deputy City EngineerdglaL Offices3. Engineering Senior'Specialist REQUEST TO APPROVE DOCUMENTS AND PROCESS FOR RECORDATION PROJECT ID NO.fS> CtvSO/- £3(p PROJECT NAME INSTRUCTIONS: Deputy City Engineer -Please sign the attached agreement(s) which are noted below by asterisk then forward this transmittal and attached documents to the Engineering Department Senior Office Specialist Senior Office Specialist - Please make one copy for file and forward original to the City Clerk. City Clerk -Please obtain City Attorney signature on the attached agreement(s) and process for recordation. Recording fees are to be charged to the City in accordance with the standard letter agreement with the Recorder's Office. When available, please return a copy of the recorded document(s) to this office for our records. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Attachments: D Hold Harmless Agrm't - Drainage D Hold_Harmless Agrm't - Driveways B"'FJeignborhood Improvement Agreement (*) D Agrm't for Undergrounding (*) D Encroachment Agreement D Other • D Hold Harmless Agrm't - Geological Failure D Hold Harmless Agrm't - Panhandle Lots D Agrm't to Pay Drainage Fees (*) D Deed Restriction (*) cc File ; , Planchecker (Transmittal only) Rev 02/22/00 RECORDING REQUESTED BY: Department of Public Works CITY OF CARLSBAD 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 Space above this line for Recorder's use. CITY OF CARLSBAD NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT Permit No. CB 010836 Parcel No. 156-152-40-00 NIANo. Ml A 01-07 THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is made this "C* day of j . 20_ot_by and between the City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation (the "City"), and Crest Lots, L.P., a limited partnership, MSK Management, Inc., a California Corporation, Its General Partner (the "Owner"). RECITALS 1. Owner is the owner of real property located in the City of Carlsbad, California and described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"). 2. Owner has applied to the City for issuance of the above identified permit to authorize the development of the Property (the "Development Permit"). 3. The City has determined that additional public improvements may be necessary in the future in order to allow Owner to proceed with development and, therefore, the Property would be suitable for development as requested by Owner if certain public improvements as described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Improvements") are constructed. H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 4. The Municipal Code of the City of Carlsbad requires the dedication of the necessary rights-of-way for and the construction by Owner of the Improvements or an agreement for the same for certain developments as a condition of approval of the Development Permit for certain building projects such as that proposed by owner. 5. The Owner has requested that the City approve the Development Permit prior the construction of the Improvements. 6. The City is willing to approve the Development Permit prior to the construction of the Improvements as requested by the Owner if Owner approves of and consents to the formation of an assessment district to include the Property for the purpose of financing the construction of the Improvements. 7. No assessment district shall be formed until completion of the Alternative Streets Design process adopted by resolution of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED between the parties as follows: Section 1. Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. Section 2. City's Obligations. The City shall approve the Development Permit promptly following the execution of this Agreement by the Owner and compliance with all applicable City ordinances and other requirements. Section 3. Owner's Obligations. Section 3.01. Owner's Consent to and Approval of Formation of an Assessment District and Lew of Assessments. In consideration for the approval of the Development Permit prior to the completion of the construction of the Improvements, Owner hereby consents to and approves of: A. the inclusion of the Property in an assessment district which may be formed by the City Council of the City for the purpose of financing the construction of the Improvements (the "Assessment District"); B. the levy of an assessment against the Property (the "Assessment") in an amount not to exceed the estimated cost of construction of the Improvements, together with the estimated incidental costs of such construction and the estimated costs of formation of the Assessment District and issuance of any bonds to be issued to represent the Assessment. The foregoing costs constituting the Assessment are set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The Assessment shall be subject to adjustment for inflation from the date first written hereinabove until the date the Assessment is confirmed and levied by the increase in the Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles as contained in the Engineering News Record or, if the Construction Cost Index for Los Angeles is no longer published, an equivalent index reasonably selected by the City Engineer. In granting the consents and approvals set forth in this H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 Section 3., Owner is acting for and on behalf of Owner, the Owner's successors, heirs, assigns, and/or transferees and intends that such consents and approvals shall be binding upon each and every such person. Except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement, the consents and approvals given by Owner shall be irrevocable. Section 3.02 Owner's Grant of a Proxy to the City for Assessment Ballot Procedure. Owner hereby grants to the City a proxy to act for and on behalf of Owner, the Owner's successors, heirs, assigns, and/or transferees for the limited purpose of completing and submitting an assessment ballot in support of the levy of the Assessment in the proceedings to form the Assessment District. In granting such proxy, Owner is acting for and on behalf of Owner, the Owner's successors, heirs, assigns, and/or transferees and intends that such proxy shall be binding upon each and every such person. Except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement, the proxy granted by Owner shall be irrevocable. Section 4. Owner's Representations and Waiver of Rights. Section 4.01 Owner's Representations. Owner hereby represents as follows: A. Owner understands and acknowledges that: 1. Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (Article XIIID and the Implementation Act may be referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law") establish certain procedures and requirements which apply when any agency such as the City considers the levy of assessments upon real property. 2. The requirements established by the Assessment Law include the following: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel to be assessed must be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of the improvement for which the assessment is to be levied; b. No assessment may be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel from the improvement for which the assessment is to be levied; H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\NeighborhoodlmprovementAgmt Rev. 9/08/00 c. Only special benefits are assessable; and d. Parcels within an assessment district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States of America shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency proposing to levy the assessment can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit from the improvement for which the assessment is being levied. 3. The procedures established by the Assessment Law include: a. The agency which proposes to levy an assessment (the "Agency") shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement for which the assessment is proposed to be levied and upon which an assessment is proposed to be imposed. b. All assessments must be supported by a detailed engineer's report prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California. c. Prior to levying a new assessment , the Agency must give written notice by mail (the "Assessment Notice") to the record owner, i.e., the owner of a parcel whose name and address appears on the last equalized secured property tax roll, of each parcel proposed to be assessed. The Assessment Notice must include: (i) the total amount of the proposed assessment chargeable to the entire assessment district, (ii) the amount chargeable to the record owner's parcel, (iii) the duration of the assessment payments, (iv) the reason for the assessment, (v) the basis on which the amount of the proposed assessment was calculated, and (vi) the date, time and location of a public hearing on the proposed assessment. d. The Assessment Notice must contain an assessment ballot that includes a place where the person returning the assessment ballot may indicate his or her name, a reasonable identification of the parcel, and his or her support or opposition to the proposed assessment. The Assessment Notice must also include, in a conspicuous place, a summary of the procedures for the completion, return and tabulation of assessment ballots. H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 e. At the time, date and place stated in the Assessment Notice, the Agency shall conduct a public hearing upon the proposed assessment. At such public hearing, the Agency shall consider all objections or protests, if any, to the proposed assessment. At such public hearing, any interested person shall be permitted to present written or oral testimony. f. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Agency shall tabulate the assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in support or opposition to the proposed assessment. If there is a majority protest against the imposition of a new assessments, the Agency may not impose the assessment. A majority protest exists if the assessment ballots submitted, and not withdrawn, in opposition to the proposed assessment exceed the assessment ballots submitted, and pot withdrawn, in favor of the proposed assessment. In tabulating the assessment ballots, the assessment ballots shall be weighted by the amount of the proposed assessment to be imposed upon each parcel for which an assessment ballot was submitted. 4. The description of the requirements and procedures established by and contained in the Assessment Law set forth above are intended only to summarize certain of such requirements and procedures. 5. The City would not agree to issue the Development Permit prior to the construction of the Improvements unless the City is assured that it will be legally able to impose the Assessment on the Property. The assurance of the City's legal ability to impose the Assessment on the Property is both a material inducement to and a material consideration for the City to enter into this Agreement and agree to issue the Development Permit prior to the construction of the Improvements. B. Owner has had a reasonable opportunity to thoroughly read and review the Assessment Law in its entirety and has further had a reasonable opportunity to consult with Owner's attorney regarding the Assessment Law and the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Section 4.02 Waiver of Rights A. In consideration of the approval by the City of the Development Permit prior to the construction of the Improvements, Owner hereby waives Owner's rights under the Assessment Law to: H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 1. object or protest the ordering by the City of the construction of the Improvements and the imposition of the Assessment at such public hearing so long as the amount of the Assessment does not exceed the amount set forth in Exhibit C hereto adjusted for inflation pursuant to Section 3.01 B above; 2. submit an assessment ballot in support of or in opposition to the imposition of the Assessment so long as the amount of the Assessment does not exceed the amount set forth in Exhibit C hereto adjusted for inflation pursuant to Section 3.01 B above; and 3. file or bring any protest, complaint or legal action of any nature whatsoever challenging the validity of the proceedings to form the Assessment District and/or the validity of the imposition of the Assessment on the Property. B. In order that the City may be assured of its ability to legally impose the Assessment on the Property and, therefore, be willing to enter into this Agreement and agree to approve the Development Permit prior to the construction of the Improvements, Owner represents and warrants that Owner has knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived for and on behalf of Owner, Owner's successors, heirs, assigns and/or transferees, each and every one of the rights specified in Section 4.02A above. C. Nothing in this waiver of rights section is intended to waive the owner's ability to participate in Alternative Streets Design process. Section 5. Alternative Satisfaction of Owner's Obligations Owner's obligations under Section 3 above may be satisfied by paying the amount set forth in Exhibit "C" adjusted for inflation at any time prior to the formation of the assessment in which case a release of this Agreement shall be recorded in the office of the San Diego County Recorder. Section 6. General Provisions. Section 6.01 Conflict with Other Agreements or Requirements of the City. Except as specifically provided in this Agreement, nothing contained herein shall be construed as releasing Owner from any condition of development of the Property or requirement imposed by any other agreement with or requirement of the City. Section 6.02 General Standard of Reasonableness. Any provision of this Agreement which requires the consent, approval, discretion or acceptance of any party hereto or any of their respective employees, officers or agents shall be deemed to require that such consent, approval or acceptance not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, unless such provision expressly incorporates a different standard. H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 Section 6.03 Entire Agreement: Amendment. This Agreement contains all of the agreements of the parties hereto with respect to the matters contained herein and no prior or contemporaneous agreement or understandings, oral or written, pertaining to any such matters shall be effective for any purpose. No provision of this Agreement may be modified, waiver, amended or added to except by a writing signed by the party against which the enforcement of such modification, waiver, amendment or addition is or may be sought. Section 6.04 Notices. Any notice, payment or instrument required or permitted by this Agreement to be given or delivered to either party shall be deemed to have been received when personally delivered or seventy-two (72) hours following deposit of the same in any United States Post Office in California, registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Owner: MSK Management, Inc. 5142 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad CA 92008 City: City of Carlsbad Attn: City Manager 1200 Carlsbad Village Dr Carlsbad CA 92008 Each party may change its address for delivery of notice by delivering written notice of such change of address to the other party. Section 6.05 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Section 6.06 Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Section 6.07 Waiver. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by any other party, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights under the default of any other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by any other party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter. Section 6.08 Singular and Plural: Gender. As used herein, the singular of any work includes the plural, and terms in the masculine gender shall include the feminine. i Section 6.09 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 Section 6.10 Construction of Agreement. This Agreement has been reviewed by legal counsel for both the City and the Owner and shall be deemed for all purposes to have been jointly drafted by the City and the Owner. No presumption or rule that ambiguities shall be construed against the drafting party shall apply to the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement. The language in all parts of this Agreement, in all cases, shall be construed as a whole and in accordance with its fair meaning and not strictly for or against any party and consistent with the provisions hereof, in order to achieve the objectives of the parties hereunder. The captions of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of construction. Section 6.11 Recitals: Exhibits. Any recitals set forth above and any attached exhibits are incorporated by reference into this Agreement. Section 6.12 Authority of Signatories. Each signatory and party hereto hereby represents and warrants to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement, and that all resolutions and/or other actions have been taken so as to enable'such party to enter into this Agreement. Section 7. Covenant Running with the Land. The parties hereto intend that the burdens and obligations of the Owner under Section 3 above constitute a covenant running with the land and that such covenant shall be binding upon all transferees of the Property. [End of page. Next page is signature page.] H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 [Signature page] CITY OF CARLSBAD, A municipal corporation of the State of California RAYMOND R. PATCHETT City Manager LLOYD B. HUBtfS, P.E. Public Works Director APPROVED AS TO FORM: RONALD R. BALL City Attorney By: Deputy City Attorney H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 [Signature Page Continued] Signed by the Owner this BcT^" day of rT\6^j ' . 20 OWNER: (Erintname here)' (Title and organization of signatory) fi By: (Sign here. (Print name here)~ "Ifi (Title and organization of signatory) (Proper notary acknowledgement of execution by Owner must be attached.) (Chairman, president or vice-president and secretary, assistant secretary, CFO or assistant treasurer must sign for corporations. Otherwise, a corporation must attach a resolution certified by the secretary or assistant secretary under corporate seal empowering the officer(s) signing to bind the corporation.) H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 10 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY The northeasterly 20.00 feet of "Parcel B, Lot Split 55-57" as shown on Record of Survey Map No. 16531, filed in the San Diego County Recorder's Office on March 31, 2000, being a portion of lot 20 of Wilsonia Tract, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to map thereof No. 2169, filed in said recorder's office on August 13, 1929. H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 11 EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS Installation of: Paving, base, sidewalk, curb & gutter, pavement preparation, clear and grub, underground utilities, sewer, water, driveway approach, contingency, inspection fee, plan check fee, and formation of assessment district. H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 12 EXHIBIT C THE ASSESSMENT PAVING BASE SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER PAVEMENT PREP. CLEAR & GRUB UNDERGROUND UTL SEWER WATER FIRE HYDRANT STREET LIGHT DRIVEWAY APROACH SUBTOTAL DESIGN CONTINGENCY (20%) ASSESS. DISTRICT COST PLAN CHECK INSPECTION TOTAL Quantity 2080 2080 445 89 2080 3120 104 104 104 150 SF SF SF LF SF SF LF LF LF EA EA SF LS Cost $2,704 $1 ,456 $1,780 $1,291 $832 $1 ,092 $31,200 $7,800 $6,032 $0 $0 $638 $54,824 $8,224 $10,965 $31,390 $3,652 $1,200 $110,254 H:\WORD\Masters\FORMS\Neighborhood Improvement Agmt Rev. 9/08/00 13 State of California ) ) County of San Diego ) On 5/30/01 before me, (Date) Linda Lopez, Notary Public , (Name, Title of Officer) personally appeared Joseph A. Gallagher and Donna C. Hilson (Name[s] of Signer[s]) ^ personally known to me -OR - (proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they t executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal LINDA LOPEZ COMM. #1163702 NOTARY PUBUC-CAUPOHMA 3AN DIEGO COUNTY .Signature oTNotary Linda Lopez V (This area for official notary seal) Title or Tvoe of Document Neighborhood Improvement Date of Document No. of Paqes Siqner(s) other than named above • . Agreement 06/13/2801 15:57 7609312784 MSK DEV GROUP PAGE 02 THE LIMITED PARTNER INTERESTS EVIDENCED HEREBY HAVE MOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACX 0? 1933, AS AMENDED, AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED UNLESS (a) COVERED BY AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED OR (b) THE PARTNERSHIP HAS BEEN FURNISHED WITH AN OPINION OF COUNSEL ACCEPTABLE TO THE PARTNERSHIP TO THE EFFECT THAT NO REGISTRATION IS LEGALLY REQUIRED FOR SUCH TRANSFER AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF CREST LOTS L.P. a California limited partnership This agreement of Limited Partnership ("Agreement") of Crest Lots L.P., a California limited partnership (the "Partnership") is made and entered into as or this 1st day of October, 19fi$, betwaan MSK Management, Inc. dba MSK Development Group, a California corporation (the "General Partner"), and Joseph A. Gallagher, MSK Management Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust FBO Joseph A. Gallagher, MSK Management Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust, Jamas P. Kamphuis, Elizabeth L, Layman.ROTH-IRA, Donna C. Wilson and Tqni L. Thomas; (the "Limited Partners"). The General Partner and the Limited Partners are collectively referred to herein as the ".Partners." 1. The Partnership. 1.1 Formation. The parties hereby form the Partnership as a limited partnership pursuant to the California Revised Limited Partnership Act, Section 15611, »t seg., of the California Corporations Code, and the rights and liabilities of the Partners shall be as provided in the California Corporations Coda, except as set forth herein to the contrary. 1.2 Term. The term of the Partnership shall begin on the date the Certificate of Limited Partnership is filed with the Secretary of state or the date hereof, whichever is later, and shall continue until December 31, 2010, unless sooner terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. 1.3 Namo. The business of the Partnership shall be conducted under the name "Crest Lots L.P." or such other name or names, as the General Partner shall choose. 1.4 Certificate of Limited Partnership. The General Partner shall file or cause to be filed in the office of the California Secretary of State a Certificate of Limited Partnership and such amendments thereto as may be required by law. The General Partner shall also, on behalf of each Partner, execute all such certificates and other documents conforming hereto and do all such filing, recording, publishing and other acts as may be appropriate to comply with tha requirements of law for the formation, continuation and operation of the Partnership as a limited partnership. 06/13/2881 15:57 7689312784 MSK DEV GROUP PAGE 83 1.5 Principal Place of Business. business of the Partnership shall-be: The principal place of 5142 Avenida Encinaa Carlsbad, California 92008 or such other place as the General Partner shall designate. 1.6 Business Purposes. The purpose of the Partnership shall be to acquire, develop, operate, maintain, improve, lease and sell the Property (as defined in Section 3.19 hereof) and to do all things necessary or convenient to accomplish such purposes including without limitation entering into, performing and carrying out contracts and any kind necessary or desirable to carry out such purposes and borrowing .money and issuing evidences of indebtedness and securing the same by mortgage, deed of trust, pledge of the Partnership. 1.7 Agent for Service of Process. The General Partner shall be the Partnership's agent for service of process in the State of California. 2.KAMES AMD ADDRESSES OF PARTNERS; 2.1 General Partner. Partner is as follows: The name and address of the General MSK DEVELOPMENT GROUP 5142 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Joseph A. Gallagher, President 2.2 Limited Partners. Limited Partners are as follows: Joseph A. Gallagher 1165 Hoover Street Carlsbad, CA 92008 MSK Management Inc. 401 (JO Profit Sharing Plan & Trust FBO Joseph A. Gallagher 5142 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 Toni L. Thomas 1246 Ridgegrove LN Escondido, CA 92029 Donna C. Wilson 6371 Paseo Corono Carlsbad, CA 92009 The names and addresses of the James P. Kampnuis 1822 Shadowood Circle Vista, CA 92083 MSK Management Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan & Trust 5142 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 Elizabeth L. Layman ROTH-IRA First Regional Bank Custodian 5950 La Place Court, Ste 160 Carlsbad, CA 92008 3. DEFINITIONS. As under in this Agreement, the following terms have the indicated meanings: £' £ CM CO*t % •g -S0) 03£ jrO I O D D PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Planner APN: j Address Greg Fisher Phone (760) 602-4629. Type of Project & Use: Zoning: V"f~<fc General Plan: CFD fin/nut) #_ • Circle One Net Project Density: _ Facilities Management Zone: DU/AC .Date of participation:Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by r this permit: ) Legend:/\ Item Complete Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: YES Item Incomplete - Needs your action NO TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ' Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. ___ YES NO TYPE DATE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: I I I [ II Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO_ NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status.(Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. ,.-'*• A v - Coastal Permit Determination Log'#: _;_'• YES NO Follow-Up Actions: .-••;,. /• , - •;-. . ,-••;' 1) .Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum ' Floor Plans). ' '' '. ' " ; ' •' "'• '- ' 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst { I I ] I I Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO ' ' (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) ', Site Plan: . . -•-. • . ~ . . ' I 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-df-vyay width, dimensionaj^setbacks and existirig. topographical lines. D D 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: D D D 1- Setbacks: D D I I I Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: 2. Accessory structure Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Structure separation I I 3. Lot Coverage: Required Required Required Required setbacks: Required Required Required Required : Required Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown D D D 4. Height:Required Shown ], I | | I 5. Parking: Spaces Required Guest Spaces/Rjequired fBp n Additional Comments , (D/be. Shown Shown diced- 4 (*+*• w- (^Y OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst ^ HRG Engineering 13445 Mango Dr. Del Mar, CA 92014 (800) 900-8585 PROJECT: Eucalyptus Crest #1 SHT. one OF thirty five TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Design Criteria & Loads 2. Lateral Analysis 3. Beams and rafters APPROVED BY: DATE: 2-3 4-23 24-35 THIS SIGNATURE IS TO BE A WET SIGNATURE NOT A COPY SHEET 2 OF Project: Eucalyptus Crest plan 1 DESIGN CRITERIA GOVERNING CODE: CONCRETE Masonry MORTAR GROUT: REINFORCING STEEL: STRUCTURAL STEEL: WELDING: LUMBER: GLULAMS: SOIL: UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1997 EDITION F'c= 2000 PSI (U.N.O.) fm= 1500 PSI (U.N.O.) F'c= 1800 PSI (TYPE S) U.N.O. F'c= 2000 PSI (U.N.O.) Fy= 60KSI (U.N.O.) Fy = 36 KSI STRUCTURAL SHAPES & PLATES Fy = 46 KSI STRUCTURAL TUBING (U.N.O.) Fy = 35KSI STRUCTURAL PIPE (U.N.O.) E70, (TYPICAL) DOUGLAS FIR LARCH #2 OR BETTER (U.N.O.) 24F-V4 FOR SIMPLE SPAN 24F-V8 FOR CANTILEVERS ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE = 1000 PSF ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE = PER TABLE 18-1A OF U.B.C. OR SEE SOIL REPORT BY HRG Engineering 13445 Mango Dr. Del Mar, CA 92014 (800) 900-8585 3/Sf Project: Eucalyptus Crest Planl Loads RoofDX. Tile 5/8" ply 2X10 @ 16" Total Ceiling D.L. Ceiling L.L. Floor D.L. Floor L.L. Ext. Walls Int. Walls 12.0psf 2.5 psf 2.5 psf 17.0 psf 5.0 psf 10.0 psf 12.0 psf 40.0 psf 16.0 psf 8.0 psf T- I I I =4.0 s -U- ^ I-S = )'2.£ I 4 (-a ^1-5^)2.4 ^ S'J ?^ (Hofiz-Poor FLOOR - roor) PLf j=r 7^ HPH 13 fLF .21 \t JL ../^.S' Vs|g.l6-UT 5&. FT (34 '» 130 ^W) +(*'**')• 1534 WAU.S>S'* 34- i££.V 2. WALLS = ROOF -:- S34 + 23 To foRCtt RooF / ^01 we- TlOOR (zs P&F) Flop rr. WAILS r INT •Roo-R =• \i PsF .S 3 * L/ME @ FLOOR - ( ^ uo FLOOR f, = l.o 55*: Rs-e.S1 I * 1,0 T= C ^ = .02 V =u; - s-s V Nv I/R s • S*'.4 * M PSf LEVEL fiOoF z"W Vx *> \o «, 36. S 36 1010 WWx 730 3Co 5 - V, W, y X^WX k Fx 1.?2 4.« 55Sj? ^.^ .3.4! LIK1E - (K£K\lM. ' ' V AftE/4 = 3?* 12. - Sooi sr Soo * 6.74 fsF - x* IH- 3/^7-0 WT UpiiFT UME (?) a. SOO + O.T.y\. - 403 I/TUFT-* U?UFT - \ V - FT. 'USE HST 37 -S/t) ^ LB.TT Hlf * S . OUT 2 To nsr AMI/SIS. floor H-KIE y /4ft e/* s 234 •+ ( W *4' ) s V =r 3 OT-tA. = 23^0 *-^' = 21,240 Ui-TT s ?C?0 lAt LINE (5) > S 3. S ' V=-f R. * «!'» / 3^7-5 ,0 ?3 \- 44^ , Vs ^0^ ^' fw s <?^. U.TT U> hsr '1 . V= TLF VfUTT = g (T) = r )6 V=r ^U * tVi = ^^ T^a ^3^ OT.\\. -P.60F fig « //? 3 £ 18-TT J- So') 4 <l/= 3? nsr go UTEPAL 4NAIV&IS , U iv TR\e> V=(37-l -f-\lf*f 0-T-H. = ?, 8-tt. ={(20'* 16 Fsf) 4- (s' W/0 a (--2S?S A- O.T.U. s F Loo ilME £)f=r TP,>6 V= . s<a.fT. RooF ^LooR. 41,770 UPLIFT = 4AZS ^- — 7 V/ y 44- , J ^ A! ^ .1 - , /=3S /= 4*0 3.4 = 2.04 12 ) (JfilFT. -H L \ /•: ./» A g/».-jj/ ) - ftp Vs. ir fw = OT. R.-M. = t-s' * rz) w W Iff U FT ^ 0 OfEK /IRE./} HOT umFT 4 (lo4. o ROOT F) w ** 3.4) + ( O.T.^ .4 ) UPLfFT ^ :iwfW, 200 lo R. LitJF V = .T- M. - 'l.ll-O ^ lo' - l HUE - 7, ?3l \7 v. W \t. -f r C '/WE 2> V- v~9 TLf 4- UPLIFT ^ 4*152- Z./N/E.TO nerr /ft- .263 ^ 4,02 &LS& >9iTE.Rr\/TE Z FLOOR- LINE Cfi]. ?Lf USE. SHE/!/? YJfrlL TTfE LINE (A\) RcoF 14-% -^ /% OHIFT * (W V- ir- /Jb ,x 3? a MST NMTE. < FLOOR. . ROOF V-PL? sr ?fl- LIME V- //Z-ZZ i«55,fif ^ ."I s/ //ME ). /?£)£>F ip.tt, ^ n ,?= *f « HST S? TE -USE lo' 9. WiFT * ONE- -SOO L t(5£ f= -> 3f3 PL? OT.H. = 3, R.K, = -—* ' A . \ f ff.tt. =| Of//FT: (fT). f s. ^ ' »_ -f- 3^x^41 *-±- -f )ZZ:^^ J ftloVlO 4(z/**?)j* 4!* -1 » //AJ& 4, /= //.S~ * 3,3>3>Z LB<> <r-> ftp 0-TM = 3,332. - R,H. ^ f^Vii! 4 -U .s;* 7' =r r ^ (410 * -3.41} + 3,332 =, Jff £3 L = 4 VI fZF OT-H- ~ 161 * [ w J 4 h*, °3 lo fa LI FT*- %1-ZC Roof u= £23 -Mgj* /. 53 I"1 = ^JTo te fLf PLf f?- ii-U, ^ -Z- - / R - \ ,100 TLF 1(9, <^^o /r^ = so, TT&& LB -3 P= /^^S-c? 4- 3,3,00 U r p. f KL G-e. 2-l, 'f o-n 2A G-R-I t* 16' OJ - 2' (3* } f f\ l\ £~ L. J H |ou-_( !tf = // _ .77" ^ T. CJ, = R = H, ALTEKHA-~m CftfyG-E fir t 1? w/tts oF 4 ^• TA^fc 2»Xc ^ Af fSL -Tl \ ,4 t • J\\f rSI|f> I K ^ __.jc y TLF IL, S .g/rfp -z "32 T- t 0 f = TSO -f 337-5-^ 12,^32 R» - 33o 42-5 \ 1 \ PSi tf^^ / Hlf - I - (F, P= w - to( J7 fir L8-FT R k) - XL , = ^20 2.= 1,3.00 16 ) = £o fr-F (HIM ) flF (HA 10 I ft* LTl* is' f-M? * Z / K S/t (24 + U * -z n U-FT HI? * 3 :-^ •'•-*•• ?v s 1,^00 las l.sos l (LEFT) =,4/440 ftp =2 *' i '- 4gO •' 17' e- = S teP =r 10 i •- I \0 fit iB-FT I=K' W =. ( f o fLF fir P/.F (HIM.-RiftHT) i«,= v jif (L i Bo FLF ">•; Ifc-TT 1,^00 LB.FT 14' = 3, HIP P = Hifi ^ 7 (0 t nr L»?>-FT s SCO = ^,82.0 v O TV 4 -•* = ii^ 40 = -ZSD PLF f- u.rr RB * 4 7 ^^-1,307 h,-zs' -SPAN (2 \-L"O.C Itsg \Z"o-C. s 47 ftF * (1 20 U. 14 \ it * 104 fLF , )33 fiF \o =I2-) = pir 1 i .. 1 I 2 L&*6' W = 12 (<o f 12) P = 2,i fir =i 4, t 5 = li' r= n,*U2 Us. WALL ^4 ^4 » /U f.LF U-JL - sss/i ?«,» ?,Sl^ U: = 2^530 i/s. J, Rf) 4' JZ' i t' IO'-f * to =p.•(404)1) + 64 ~ 116 fLf L&> t ' rJ\~ L fts- 2 U- \2-3 (?i.= ^..32^ tl PLF d IO.S' LHJ t f 21'/16 ^ ' 33/25' k&ST} f\Jc>y>^> L£>\* r = IS'Low goof s^ f(i+l = 204 PLF (tlAX.\ L6s f=LOOR R ^2,\z\ La> = 3/T-lo L •f* 10.5'fLOOR _ 3>4 = 3-s'(34) s n^ fif = 7, riF * \ • Roof) ROOF) ,«.' K FH-i WAIL FLOOR 1T-0 ft? 2d4 fL? la* FH-Z (w*u) s ^= )U flF v ^ 1,6/4 Rx K *- T-S' fLF .10 U-TT 14 \TLF fJLF HIP - s \\>S' VJ- 2 (34) rr l 1 MORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. AMENDED PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION FOR •j RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION EXPANSION LOTNO.'S8,9andlO 1 1858 BUENA VISTA DRIVE J' CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA ]© PREPARED FOR MSK DEVELOPMENT ATTN: DONNA WILSON 5142 AVENIDA ENCINAS CARLSBAD, CA 92008 AUGUST 10, 1999 PROJECT NO. CE-5837-A MORTH COUMTY COMPACTIONENGINEERING, INC. August 10,1999 Project No. CE-5837-A MSK Development 5142 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attn: Donna Wilson SUBJECT: Amended Preliminary Soils Investigation LotNo.'s8,9andlO 1858 Buena Vista Drive . Carlsbad, California Dear Ms. Wilson: In response to your request, we have performed a Preliminary Soils Investigation for the subject project. It is our understanding that adjoining Lots 8, 9 and 10 will be amended to the proposed six lot sub-division located at 2785 Crest Drive. Recommendations for Lots 1,2, 3, 5,6 and 7 are presented in our "Preliminary Soils Investigation" dated June 21,1999. Recommendations for Lots 8, 9 and 10 are presented herewith. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the suitability of the site for the proposed development and make recommendations with regard to site grading and foundation design. Briefly, our investigation revealed favorable soil conditions and in our opinion, the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided recommendations set forth in the attached report are adhered to. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, ESTC. Ronald K. Adams President RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted (2) filed DaleR-Regli Registered Civil Geotechnical EngirT P. O. BOX 302002 * ESCOXDEDO, CA 92030 * (760)480-1116 FAX (760)741-6568 MORTH COUMTY ' COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Purpose and Scope 2. Location and Description of Site 3. Field Investigation 4. Soil Conditions 5. Laboratory Soil Testing 6. Recommendations and Conclusions A. Grading B. Foundations C. Slopes D. Retaining Walls E. Estimated Paving Section F. Review of Grading Plan i 7. Uncertainty and Limitations Page 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 7 APPENDIX Appendix A: Exploration Legend & Unified Soil Classification Chart Plate No. One Plate No. Two Plate No. Three Test Pit Location Plan Exploration Log Tabulation of Test Results Appendix B: Recommended Grading Specifications MORTH COUNTY 'COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837-A Paee 1 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of the investigation was to determine if the site is suitable for the proposed residential sub-division (LotNo.'s 8, 9 and 10). The scope of the investigation was to: A. Determine the physical properties and engineering characteristics of the surface and subsurface soils. B. Provide design information with regard to grading, site preparation, and foundation design of the proposed structure(s). 2. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SITE The site is located at the west comer or Buena Vista Drive and Crest Drive in the City of Carlsbad, California. Adjoining Lot No.'s 8, 9 and 10 will become part of the proposed six lot sub-division outlined in our previously submitted "Preliminary Soils Investigation", dated June 2 1,1999. The three adjoining lots are rectangular in shape and cover approximately 140 feet and 179 feet of frontage along Buena Vista Drive and Crest Drive, respectively. The southwest boundary of the lots is bordered by a single family dwelling and the northwest boundary will abutt Lot No. 7 of the recently planned sub-division. Site topography of the lots consist of predominantly flat terrain pitched slightly downhill to the northeast and east The site is presently occupied with a single family dwelling and small agricultural greenhouses. The dwelling is generally landscaped with trees, shrubs, grasses, walkways, fences, etc. 3. FIELD INVESTIGATION The field investigation was performed on July 291999 and included an inspection of the site and the excavation of one exploratory trench, with a backhoe to depths of five feet Location of test pit is shown on the attached Plate No. One, entitled "Test Pit Location Plan". As excavation proceeded, representative bulk samples were collected. In place natural densities and moisture contents were determined at different depths in the excavations and are included on Plate No. Two. Subsequent to obtaining soil samples, our exploratory excavations were backfilled. NORTH COCIMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837-A Page 2 4. SOIL CONDITIONS Loose surficial soils (silty-sands) consisting of old fill and/or plowed ground were found to be 1.5 feet in our test pit excavation. Underlying native soils to depths explored were dense silty- sands of the coastal terrace deposit. On-site soils were found to have an expansion index of less than 10 and are classified as being "very low" in expansion potential. Therefore, no special consideration need be given this characteristic. Groundwater was not encountered at the time of our investigation, nor did caving of exploratory trench occur. In addition, due to the dense nature of the underlying sandstone formation at the site, it is our opinion, soil liquefaction is unlikely to occur in the event grading is performed in accordance with the recommendations set forth in this report. 5. LABORATORY SOIL TESTING All laboratory test were performed on typical soils in accordance with accepted test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Tests conducted include: A). Optimum Moisture & Maximum Density (ASTM D-1557) B). Direct Shear (Remold) (ASTM D-3080) C). Sieve Analysis (ASTM D-421) D). Field Density & Moisture (ASTM D-1556) E). Expansion Potential (FHA. Standard) Test results are tabulated on the attached Plate No.'s Two and Three, entitled "Exploration Log" and "Tabulation of Test Results". 6. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS General It is our understanding, the proposed dwellings will consist of wood frame construction utilizing slab on grade foundations. In our opinion, the site is suitable for the proposed residential sub-division expansion. Recommendations presented in this report should be incorporated into the planning, design, and construction phases of the subject project. MORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837-A Page 3 6A. Grading General It is our understanding cut/fill earthwork construction will be performed to create a level building pads to accommodate slab on grade foundations. Furthermore, minor cut and fill slopes constructed at inclinations of 2:1 or flatter are planned. All grading should be performed in accordance with the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance and the Recommendations/Specifications presented in this report. Subsequent to site demolition, loose surficial soils (plowed ground/old fill), as indicated on the attached Plate No. Two, should be undercut or removed to firm native ground and recompacted in accordance with the attached Appendix 'B' entitled "Recommended Grading Specifications". Firm native ground may be determined as undisturbed soil having an insiru density of greater than ninety percent (90%) of maximum dry density. We should be contacted to document firm native ground is exposed and properly prepared prior to filling. A subdrain system should be installed where filling of swales, draws, or canyons is proposed The location of the drain should be determined by the Soils Engineer and/or his representative at the time of grading. Subdrain construction should consist of a 24 inch X 24 inch trench excavated into firm natural soil. The trench should be backfilled with 1 inch minus crushed rock with a 6 inch perforated pipe (holes down) placed at the center of the rock. The rock should be wrapped in filter fabric to reduce siltation of drain materials. All drains should have a minimum of one percent (1 %) fall toward their outlets. Prior to constructing fill slopes, shear keys should be excavated a minimum of 2 feet into firm native ground, inclined back into slope, and have a minimum width of 15 feet. We should be contacted to document keyways were properly constructed prior to placing fill. Natural terrain steeper than an inclination of 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), should be benched (stair-stepped) to provide a stable bedding for subsequent fill. Sizing of benches should be determined by the Soils Engineer or his representative during grading. All fill soils generated from earthwork construction should be placed in conformance with the attached Appendix 'B' entitled, "Recommended Grading Specifications". Should soils to be imported, they should be non-expansive (less than 2% swell) and granular by nature, having strength parameters equal to or greater than the prevailing on-site soils. We should be contacted to inspect an/or test imported soils prior to hauling then on-site to assure they will be suitable for the proposed construction. MORTH COUMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-583 7-A Page 4 Particles of asphalt and concrete debris, having a diameter of greater than 6 inches, will not be suitable fill material and should be separated from fines during grading and hauled off-site. If encountered, leach lines and'or pipes should be removed. Concrete pipes may be crushed in place. Trench lines should be recompacted in accordance with Appendix 'B'. Temporary slopes steeper than 1:1 ratios to be retained at a later date should be back cut to the standard specifications set forth by CAL-OSHA. To avoid delays during the course of construction, we recommend CAL-OSHA be contacted to determine the back cut slope ratio with regard to the slope height prior to the start of constructioa It should be noted, CAL-OSHA may require a slope stability analysis by our firm to verify temporary slopes will be stable during the construction phase of the subject project. It is highly probable the proposed structure(s) will be traversed by a transition from cut to fill. Therefore, to reduce structural damage occurring from foundations bearing on two different soil types, the following measure should be employed: It is recommended the cut side of the transitional areas be removed to a depth of 1 foot below the bottom of the deepest proposed footing and brought back to grade with properly compacted fill. This will allow the proposed strucrure(s) to bear entirely on a compacted fill mat, thus ] reducing the probability of differential settlement. The removal area should extend under and a J minimum of 5 feet beyond the proposed dwelling(s). 4 * ' 6B. Foundations General On-site soils are comprised on sandy-materials possessing "very-low" expansion potential and have above average strength parameters. Therefore, conventional foundations may be utilized, provided the aforementioned Grading Recommendation are adhered to. For One-Story Construction: Continuous footing having a minimum width of 12 inches and founded a minimum depth of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade will have an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot. For Two-Story Construction: Continuous footings should have a minimum width of 15 inches and be founded a minimum depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade. MORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837-A Paee5 Isolated square footings having a diameter of 18 inches and founded a minimum depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade will have an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot. All continuous footings are to be reinforced with one #4 bar top and bottom. Steel should be positioned 3 inches above bottom of footing and 3 inches below top of footing. Interior slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches thick and reinforced with #3 bars on 18 inch centers, both ways at mid-point of slab thickness. Slab underlayment should consist of 4 inches of washed concrete sand with a visqueen moisture barrier installed at mid-point of sand (2 inches sand, visqueen, 2 inches sand). Sand should be tested in accordance with ASTM D-2419 to insure a minimum sand equivalent of 30. • Foundation set-backs from top of slopes should be a minimum of 8 feet If this cannot be achieved, footings near or on adjacent slopes should be founded at a depth such that the horizontal distance from the bottom outside edge of footing to the face of the slope is a minimum of 8 feet > • " Prior to pouring of concrete, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. should be contacted to inspect foundation recommendations for compliance to those set forth. During placement of concrete North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC and/or a qualified concrete inspector should be present to document construction of foundations. 6C. Slopes Cut and compacted fill slopes constructed to maximum heights of 15 feet with maximum slope ratios of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical units) will be stable with relation to deep seated failure, provided they are properly maintained During grading, positive drainage away from top of slopes should be provided Subsequent to completion of grading, slopes should be planted as soon as possible with light groundcover indigenous to the area. Our slope stability analysis was performed utilizing "Taylor's Charts" for cut and compacted fill slopes and a safety factor of 1.5. 6D. Retaining Wallso For static conditions, the prevailing soils will have an allowable equivalent passive fluid pressure of 355 psf, increasing 355 psf per foot in depth. Allowable pressures assume walls are j MORTH COOMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837-A Page 6 backfilled with a non-expansive sand a distance behind the wall equivalent to two-thirds the retained height. Allowable active pressures may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing ; 36 pcf for unrestrained walls. These values assume a vertical, smooth wall, and a level, drained backfill. Should these conditions not be met, we should be contacted for new values. ~~i ; Allowable active pressures for restrained walls may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 36 pcf, plus an additional uniform lateral pressure of 8H. H=height of "1 . retained soils above top of wall footing in vertical feet . i Allowable active pressures for retaining walls with 2:1 inclinations of sloping surcharge may be "| assumed to be equivalent to a pressure of fluid weighing 52 pcf. The coefficient of friction of concrete to soil may be assumed to be .35 for resistance to ; horizontal movement. J ' 6E. Estimated Paving Section ; ^ Proposed interior streets and driveways are based on an estimated R-Value of 45. The following . j section is provided for bid purposes only. Actual sections should be determined subsequent to -: •• completion of grading operations. t ; .Interior Streets Assumed Traffic Index = 4.5 •; (Light Vehicular Traffic) j 3 inches of asphaltic paving on 4 inches of select base coarse on ^ 6 mches of recompacted native subgrade. 4 * Proposed Private Driveways 2 inches of asphaltic paving on 4 inches of select base coarse on ., 6 inches of recompacted native subgrade. ! All materials and construction for asphaltic paving and base should conform to the Standard Specifications of the State of California Business and Transportation Agency, Department of j Transportation, Sections 39 and 26, respectively. Class n base material should have a minimum R-Value of 78 and a sand equivalent of 30. All materials should be compacted to a minimum of . v / ninety-five percent (95%). NORTH COUNTYCOMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-583 7-A Paee7 Note: The City of Carlsbad may impose a minimum pavement section that may exceed the above estimated section. Rigid Concrete Paving: 5 inches' of concrete reinforced with #3 bars on 1 8 inch centers, both ways, on .4 inches of Class n base material on 6 inches of recompacted native subgrade soil. NOTE: All concrete should have a minimum compressive strength of 3250 psi. All subgrade and base materials should be compacted to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95°/o). 6F. Review of Grading Plane> • Approved site and grading plans were not available at the time of our investigation. Therefore, upon their completion, we should review them to assure compliance with the recommendations presented in this report •, 7. UNCERTAINTY AND LIMITATIONS Surface and subsurface soils are assumed to be uniform. Therefore, should soils encountered during construction differ from those presented in this report, we should be contacted to provide their engineering properties, It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to carry out recommendations set forth in this report During our, investigation of the subject site, evidence of faulting was not encountered. Subsequent to review of available geologic literature, we feel any faulting in the vicinity of the site may be classified as inactive. However, it should be noted that San Diego County is located in a high seismic area with regard to earthquake. Earthquake proof projects are economically unfeasible. Therefore, damage as a result of earthquake is probable and we assume no liability. We assume the on-site safety of our personnel only. We cannot assume liability of personnel other than our own. It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to insure construction operations are conducted in a safe manner and in conformance with regulations governed by CAL-OSHA and/or local agencies. MORTH COUNTY 'COAIPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-58367-A Page 8 Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President Dale R. Regli Registered Ci Geotechnical Engi RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted (2) filed NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Soil Testing & Inspection Services J' J SOU, DESCRIPTION' EXPLORATION7 LEGEND UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SYMBOL TYPICAL NAMES I. COARSE GRAINED: More than half of material is farcer than No. 200 sieve size. GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve size, but smaller than 3". GRAVELS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) SANDS CLEAN SANDS More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve size. SANDS WITH FINES (appreciable amount of fines) H. FINE GRAINED: More than half of material is smaller than No.200 sieve size. SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit less than 50 SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit greater than 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH PT Well graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines. Poorly graded gravels, grave! sand mixtures, little or no fines. Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel- sand-silt mixtures. Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, clay mixtures. Well graded sand, gravely sands, little or no fines. Poorly graded sands, gravely sands, little or no fines. Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silt mixtures. Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey- silt-sand mixtures with slight plasticity. Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravely clays, lean clays. Organic silts and organic silry clays of low plasticity. Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous find sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. Peat and other highly organic soils. US - Undisturbed, driven ring sample or rube sample CK - Undisturbed chunk sample BG-Bulk sample V • Water level at time of excavation or as indicated APPENDIX 'A' NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. SOFL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN SUB-DIVISION EXPANSION LOT NO. 8, 9 & 10 BDENA VISTA DR. CARLSBAD, CA oits - -T- .*=• - ''XT- - 21 1999 I PROJECT NO. CE-5837-A PLATE NO. ONE MORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING/INC. EXPLORATION LOG PROJECT NAME: STTPj.nTVTSTON F.yPANSION DATE LOGGED: 02/22/22. ELEVATION: EXISTING GRADE,TEST PIT NO. .FOUR. Depth (Feet) 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- S ample Tjpc BG CK Diy Density (pcf) 118.1 - Moisture Contetf C/«) 5.7 1 I Passing #200 Sieve 29.8 Sample Depth 2' 1 Soil GassiC cation SM SM Description & Remarks BROWN, DRY, LOOSE, SILTY-SAND (PLOV.'ED GROUND / ELL) _(REMOVE & RECOMPACT) YELLOW BROV.'N, HL^CD, DENSE, SILTY-SAND (HRM NATIVE) t BOTTOM OF TEST PIT NOTE: TESTPITNO.'S1THRU3 V.'ERE PRESENTED IN OUR PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED REPORT DATED JUNE 2 3, 1999 PROJECT NO.•CE-5837-A PLATE NO. TWO COUNTY ' COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS OPTIMUM M01STURF./MAX7MUM DENSITY SOIL DESCRIPTION TYPE YeDow Brown Silty-Sand P4 @ 2' MAX. DRY DENSITY (T.B. CU. 131.3 OPT. MOISTURE (% DRY WD 8.7 F.YPANSTDNPOTET SAMPLE NO. CONDITION INITIAL MOISTURE (%) AIR DRY MOISTURE (%) FINAL MOISTURE (%) ' DRY DENSITY (PCF) LOAD (PSF) SWELL (%) EXPANSION INDEX Remold 90% 8.7 1.5 11.3 118.2 150 .000 0 DIRECT SHEAR SAMPLE NO.P4 @. 2' CONDITION ANGLE INTERNAL FRICTION COHESION INTERCEPT (PCF) Remold 90% 28 210 PROJECT NO. CE-5837-A PLATE 1S7O. THREE MORTH COUrSTY ' COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS (General Provisions) 1. INTENT The intent of these specifications is to provide procedures in accordance with current standard practices regarding clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to receive fill, and placing and compacting of fill soil to the lines , grades, and slopes delineated on the project plans. Recommendations set forth in the attached "Preliminary Soils Investigation" report or special provisions are apart of the "Recommended Grading Specifications" and shall supercede the provisions contained hereinafter in case of conflict 2. INSPECTION & TESTING j A qualified Soils Engineer shall be employed to inspect and test the earthwork in accordance with these specification and the accepted plans. It will be necessary that the Soils Engineer or his I representative be allowed to provide adequate inspection so that he may certify that the work j was or was not accomplished as specified or indicated. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the Soils Engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes, new information and dates, and new unforeseen soils conditions so that he may make these certifications. If substandard conditions (questionable soils, adverse weather, poor moisture control, inadequate compaction, etc.) Are encountered, the Soils Engineer will be empowered to either stop construction until conditions are remedied or recommend rejection of the work Soil tests used to determine the degree of compaction will be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) test methods: *Maximum Density &. Optimum Moisture Content (ASTM D-l557-78) * Density of Soil In-Place (ASTMD-1556 or ASTMD-2922 & 3017) 3. MATERIALS Those soils used as fill will have a minimum of forty percent (40%) passing a #4 sieve. They will be free of vegetable matter or other deleterious substances and contain no rock over 6 inches in size. Should unsuitable material be encountered, the Soils Engineer will be contacted to provide recommendations. APPENDIX .'B'- WORTH COCJMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. 4. PLACING AND SPREADING OF FILL The selected fill material shall be placed in layers which when compacted will not exceed 6 inches in thickness. . Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly blade mixed during the spreading to insure uniformity of material in each layer. When moisture content of the fill material is below that recommended by the Soils Engineer, water shall then be added until the moisture content is as specified to assure thorough bonding during the compacting process. When the moisture content of the fill materials is above that recommended by the Soils. Engineer, the fill material, shall be aerated by blading or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is as specified. 5. COMPACTION After each layer has been placed, mixed, and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to not less than ninety percent (90%) relative compaction. Compaction shall be by sheepsfoot rollers multiple-wheel pneumatic tired rollers or other types of rollers. Rolling shall be accomplished while the fill material is at the specified moisture content. Rolling each layer shall be continuous over it's entire area and the roller shall make sufficient trips to insure that the desired density has been obtained. The fill operation shall be continued in 6 inch compacted layers, or as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes and grades shown on the project plans. 6. WALL BACKFILL • Backfill soils should consist of non-expansive sand, Compaction should be achieved with light hand-held pneumatic tampers to avoid over compaction and hence cause structural damage. Wall backfill should be compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of maximum density. 7. TRENCH BACKFILL All trench backfill located within structural areas should be compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of maximum density. APPENDIX 'B' MORTH COUMTY 'COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. October 29,1999 Project No. CE-5837 MSK Development Group 5142 Averu'da Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attn: Donna Wilson • Subject: Evaluation of Proposed Watermain Location --{• Proposed Residential Subdivision • " -;T ." Lots 1 thru 10 : .:" .. Crest Drive and Buena Vista Drive ;'"'•'. -:U';/: Carlsbad, California :' ".References): 1.) "Preliminary Soils Investigation" prepared by North County ' ;'£•.•'• Compaction Engineering, Inc., dated June 21,1999 ../.:;•'. 2.) "Amended Preliminary Soils Investigation" prepared by North ' •:. y;''..'-. . County Compaction Engineering, Inc., dated August 10,1999 ••'^ '"V.^- -: /-^ ,«< Dear Ms. Wilson: • Per your request, we have reviewed the project waterline plot plan prepared by K & S Engineering. In addition, we have performed site inspection to determine the location of the proposed 8 inch waterline in relation to the existing off-site slope located along the northeast shoulder of Crest Drive. ' Our review and site inspection indicates the proposed waterline will be located inside and parallel to the northeast property line of the subdivisioa Therefore, the pipe will be set back 30 plus feet from the top of the slope located along Crest Drive^ Furthermore, soils exposed in this • area are native costal terrace deposits (silty-sands) with relatively good supporting characteristics. It is our understanding, this area will receive a shallow fill (3 foot fill slope) and • the pipe will be bedded less than 5 feet in depth. In our opinion, if the pipe is bedded properly and grading at the pipe location is performed in accordance with the above referenced soils reports, the proposed watermain should not . surcharge and/or impact the descending slope along the northeast shoulder of Crest Drive. P. O. BOX 302002 * ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 * (760)480-1116 FAX (760)7441-6568 NORTH COUMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837 Page 2 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President Dale R. ReW^£cH^ ••'.'•"•••"; RegisteredCh '-'r.-':'Geotechnical EngfilieT""000713 RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted MSKPLAN 1,2 Carlsbad Climate Zone 7 Concepts West Plans for this MSKPlan 1,2 have been been reviewed. The following Title 24 energy report demonstrates compliance with California's Title 24 energy code for new residential projects. Mark Gallant, CEPE Compliance Method - MICROPAS v5.0 December 13, 1999 Haynal and Company, Inc. 425 W. 5th Ave, Ste. 201 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 743-5408 Contractor's License #649028