Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1925 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE; ; CB920719; PermitBUILDING PERMIT 10/01/92 11:23 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 1925 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE Suite: Permit Type: INDUSTRIAL BUILDING Parcel No: Lot#: Valuation: 98>423 Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: B2/M Referenced: Description: 800 SF BLOCK CONTROL HOUSE AND : 10' HIGH MASONRY WALL Permit No: CB920719 Project No: A9201715 Development No: 9539 10/01/92 0001 01 02 C-PRMT 4299-00 Appl/Ownr ROEL CONSTRUCTION 3366 KURTZ STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 921 Status: ISSUED Applied: 07/23/92 Apr/Issue: 10/01/92 Validated By: DC 619 297-4156 *** Fees Required Fees : Adjustments: Total Fees: Fee description Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee Enter ".Y" to Autoc * BUILDING TOTAL cted & Credits *** .00 215.00 4,299.00 Ext fee Data 635.00 413.00 21.00 1791.00 Y 1654.00 4514,00 FINAL APPROVAL AS tanf CLEARANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Us Palmas Dr., Cttbtad. CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department2075 Las Paties Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 1. PERMIT TYPE A - U Commercial U New Building U TenanrTlmprovement B jglndustrial Ej^New Building D Tenant Improvement C - D Residential D Apartment DCondo D Single Family Dwelling D Addition/Alteration D Duplex n Demolition Q Relocation D Mobile Home D Electrical D Plumbing D Mechanical DPool Q Spa D Retaining Wall D Solar Q Other PLAN CHECK NO. EST.VAL PLAN CK DEPOSIT o-3 /> VALID. BY_ DATE ax -</*(•(• 2. PROJECT INFORMATION jtfTyf^CsKdjiio Vida Roble '' Nearest Cross Street PalomaT Oaks Way Building or Suite No. , . , N/A LEGAL DESCKIFFION Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Lot 5 Tract No 81-46 CHECK BELOW IV yUBMl'l'l'tlU: D 2 Energy Gales H 2 Structural Gales B 2 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL Zl/~UyZ-iy Soils Report D 1 Addressed Envelope EXISTING USE vacant FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Unit No. Phase No.Unit 1 PROPOSED USE electrical substati DESCRIPTION OF WORK Construct a masonry block control house structure and 10' high masonry wall SQ. FT. 800 # OF STORIES 1 PtKSUN (.it ditierent rrom applicant.) NAME CITY San Dieeo ADDRESS STATE CA ZIP CODE 191 Ash Street, P.O. Box 1831 92112 DAY TELEPHONE (619) 696-2732 4. APPLICANT U CONTRACTOR^ NAME SDG&E DAGENT I-OR CONTRALIXJR ADDRESS CITY San Diego STATE CA UOWNfcR UAGENT FOR OWNER p^ Street> p 0> Box 1831 ZIP CODE 92112 DAY TELEPHONE (619) 696-2732 5. PROPERTY OWNER NAME SDG6E CITY San Diego STATE CA ADDRESS 101 Ash Street, P.O. Box 1831 ZIP CODE 92112 DAY TELEPHONE (619) 696-2732 6. GONTHACTORNAME CITY Construction San Diego STATE CA STATE UC. #L§4531 ADDRESS 3366 Kurtz street ZIP CODE 92i38-02BYTELEPHONE (619) 297-4156 LICENSE CLASS B-l CITY BUSINESS LIC. #1196206 Dt-MUNtK WAMt _____bIJUodi CITY San Dieeo STATE CA AUUKt^S ZIP CODE 101 Ash Street, P.O. Box 1831 92112 DAY TELEPHONgl9 696-273?TATE LIC. # 7. WOltlUiKS'UJMFliWSAIKJN Workers^ Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate ot consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY self insured POLICY Nocert no 806EXPIRATION DATE until cancelled Certiiicate ol Exemption: 1 certify that m the performance ol the work tor which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE 8. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARAIIUN Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby afnrm that I am exempt from the Contractors License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the .applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE ml 1DENT1AL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES S NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? P YES El NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES S NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNIESS THE AHUCANT 9. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AUEHCY I hereby attirm that there is a construction lending agency lor the perlormance ot the work tor which this permit is issued (Sec 3097U) civil Code). LENDER'S NAME SDG6£ LENDER'S ADDRESS 101 Ash Street, P.O. Boxl831, San Diego, CA 92112 10. APPLICANT IXKTOTCJVnON rcertiry that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct."I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SATO CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code). DATE: WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance DEPT: BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M PLAN CHECK*: CB920719 PERMIT*: CB920719 PROJECT NAME: 800 SF BLOCK CONTROL HOUSE AND 10' HIGH MASONRY WALL ADDRESS: 1925 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MH SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: WATER DATE: 11/30/92 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST INSPECTED BY: DATE INSPECTED: / INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK*: CB920719 DATE: 11/30/92 PERMIT*: CB920719 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST PROJECT NAME: 800 SF BLOCK CONTROL HOUSE AND 10' HIGH MASONRY WALL ADDRESS: 1925 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MH SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: INSPECTED . BY: /7/ 7T ,^'V~s"~r --AS- INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS : DATE , . INSPECTED: / x| 1 J41 APPROVED )( DATE INSPECTED : APPROVED DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED•^ DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED 06/24/93 INSPECTION HISTORY LISTING FOR PERMIT* CB920719 DATE INSPECTION TYPE 12/30/92 Final Combo 11/30/92 Final Combo 11/30/92 Final Combo 10/29/92 Grout 10/29/92 Grout 10/28/92 Footing 10/28/92 Footing 10/28/92 Grout 10/27/92 Footing 10/27/92 Footing 10/27/92 Grout 10/26/92 Footing 10/23/92 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 10/23/92 Grout 10/23/92 Grout 10/21/92 Grout 10/21/92 Grout 10/20/92 Grout 10/20/92 Grout 10/19/92 Grout 10/19/92 Grout 10/16/92 Grout 10/16/92 Grout 10/15/92 Grout 10/15/92 Grout 10/14/92 Grout 10/14/92 Grout 10/13/92 Footing 10/13/92 Footing 10/13/92 Grout 10/09/92 Grout 10/09/92 Grout 10/08/92 Footing 10/08/92 Footing 10/08/92 Grout 10/05/92 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 10/05/92 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 10/05/92 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 09/28/92 Footing 09/28/92 Grout INSP ACT COMMENTS TP RI TP RI TP RI TP TP RI TP TP RI TP RI TP RI TP RI TP RI TP RI TP RI TP RI TP RI TP TP RI TP RI TP TP RI MPC MFC TP TP PA RI CO RI AP RIwe AP RIwe AP RI AP RI AP RI AP RI NR RI AP RI AP RI PI RI AP RI AP AP RI PA RI AP AP RI PA AP we AP MH ND CONG REPORTS MH/GARY/431-2021 W.WALL COMPLETE 2ND LIFT MH/GARY/431-2021 W WALL(PART)2ND LIFT MH/GARY/431-2021 W WALL (PART) 2ND LIFT MH/GARY/431-2021 CONTROL BLDG ROOF SLAB MH/GARY/431-2021 WEST WALL 2ND LIFT MH/GARY/431-2021 2ND LIFT WEST WALL MH/GARY/431-2021 MH/GARY/431-2021 EAST WALL 1ST LIFT MH/GARY/431-2021 CONTRL BLDG 2ND LIFT MH/GARY/431-2021 CONTROL BLDG 2ND LIFT MH/GARY/431-2021 N.WALL 1ST LIFT COMPLETE MH/GARY/431-2021 SEE INSP NOTES FIRE LIFT CONNTROL HOUSE MH/GARY/PM PLEASE SOUTH WALL 1ST LIFT MH/GARY/431-2021 BLK WALL COMPLETE GROUT NO & WEST WALLS 1ST LIFT MH/GARY SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES NORTH WALL 2ND LIFT /' HIT <RETURN> TO CONTINUE... BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M AN CHECK*: CB920719 ^RMIT#: CB920719 PROJECT NAME: 800 SF BLOCK CONTROL HOUSE AND 10' HIGH MASONRY WALL ADDRESS: 1925 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE WATER DATE: 11/30/92 PERMIT TYPE: INDUST CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MH SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE INSPECTED; DATE INSPECTED; DATE INSPECTED; Otft APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS : *A^ «f ' INSPECTTQM DATE *S/9-l/r? INSPECTOR PERMIT # PLANCK » JOB ADDRESS TIME ARRIVE: _____ TIME LEAVE: CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS PERMITS 6/15/89 CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB920719 FOR 11/30/92 DESCRIPTION: 800 SF BLOCK CONTROL HOUSE AND 10' HIGH MASONRY WALL TYPE: INDUST JOB ADDRESS: 1925 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE APPLICANT: ROEL CONSTRUCTION PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: STR: 619 297 REMARKS: MH SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK# CB920719 C GRP B2/M STR. TYPE VN STE: TOTAL TIME: CD LVL DESCRIPTION 19 29 39 49 ACT COMMENTS ST Final Structural PL Final Plumbing EL Final Electrical ME Final Mechanical ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 102992 Grout 102892 Grout 102792 Grout 102392 Grout 102392 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 102192 Grout 102092 Grout 101992 Grout 101692 Grout 101592 Grout 101492 Grout 101392 Footing 101392 Grout 100992 Grout 100892 Footing 100892 Grout 100592 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 100592 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 092892 Grout ACT AP AP AP AP AP AP NR AP AP PI AP AP AP PA AP AP PA AP AP INSP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP TP MPC MFC TP COMMENTS W.WALL COMPLETE 2ND LIFT W WALL(PART)2ND LIFT W WALL (PART) 2ND LIFT WEST WALL 2ND LIFT CONTROL BLDG ROOF SLAB 2ND LIFT WEST WALL EAST WALL 1ST LIFT CONTRL BLDG 2ND LIFT CONTROL BLDG 2ND LIFT N.WALL 1ST LIFT COMPLETE SEE INSP NOTES FIRE LIFT CONNTROL HOUSE SOUTH WALL 1ST LIFT BLK WALL COMPLETE GROUT NO & WEST WALLS 1ST LIF SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES NORTH WALL 2ND LIFT CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB920719 FOR 10/05/92 DESCRIPTION: 800 SF BLOCK CONTROL HOUSE AND 10' HIGH MASONRY WALL TYPE: INDUST JOB ADDRESS: 1925 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE APPLICANT: ROEL CONSTRUCTION PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: REMARKS: MH/GARY SPECIAL INSTRUCT: PM PLEASE INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK# CB920719 OCC GRP B2/M CONSTR. TYPE VN STR: FL: STE: 619 297-4156 INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: —RELATED PERMITS—PERMIT# TYPE STATUS CB920902 ELEC ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 11 ST Ftg/Foundation/Piers IL <e3w*»**l7$^ #&&&<z*?y j>d?*x??<**S * ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB920719 FOR 10/13/92 DESCRIPTION: 800 SF BLOCK CONTROL HOUSE AND 10' HIGH MASONRY WALL TYPE: INDUST JOB ADDRESS: 1925 CAMINO VIDA ROBLE APPLICANT: ROEL CONSTRUCTION PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: PHONE: STR: 619 297-4 INSPECTOR AREA MC PLANCK# CB920719 OCC GRP B2/M CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: REMARKS: MH/GARY/431-2021 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: PM PLEASE INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: CD LVL DESCRIPTION 61 MA Footing ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 100892 Footing 100892 Footing 100892 Grout 100592 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 100592 Ftg/Foundation/Piers ACT INSP COMMENTS AP TP BLK WALL COMPLETE AP TP BLK WALL COMPLETE AP TP GROUT NO & WEST WALLS 1ST LIF PA MPC SEE INSP NOTES AP MPC SEE INSP NOTES 1^/i. \\ i ^ K.'\.\UA L-l^, i A C. 10037 BARNES CVN. RD. SUITE A SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619) 458-9379 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB NO: JOB NAME: JOB ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: S91007.MX Palomar Substation 1925 Camino Vida Robles Rocl Construction TYPE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: Masonry PLACE OF INSPECTIONATESTING: DATE: 10/20/92 REPORT NO: 4 WEATHER: SDG&ENO: 5928310 PLAN NO: APPLICATION NO: Material Description ASTM C-90 TVPC I grade N.C.M.U.. Mortar Type M 2.500 psi. Grout 2.000psi. ASTM A615. Grade 60 reinforcing steel Page 1 of 3 10/7/92 Observed lay-up 8 courses above top of footing, free standing C.M.U. perimeter site walls at the following locations: 1) North wall from northwest corner to 72' east. 1 set 3 mortar test samples fabricated from this location. 3rd course above top of footing 36' east of west end. 2) West wall from north and to 36' south. Observed proper mixing and handling of mortar. Observed proper placement of reinforcing steel. The observed : complies with the approved plans and specifications. 10/8/92 Observed lay-up 8 courses west perimeter site wall from 36' south of north end of wall to 166' south of north end of wall. 1 set 3 mortar test samples fabricated 5th course above to of footing 123' south of north end of wall. Observed proper mixing and handling of mortar. Observed proper placement of reinforcing steel. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. 10/9/92 Observed lay-up 8 courses C.M.U. perimeter site walls at the following locations: 1) West perimeter wall from south end of wall to 70' north. 2) South perimeter wall from west end of wall to 88 east. 1 set 3 mortar test samples fabricated at 8th course above top of footing, 50' east of west end of wall. Observed proper mixing and handling of mortar. Observed proper placement of reinforcing steel. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. 10/12/92 Observed placement 9 cu. yds Premix Grout Mix #51-3154 at 1st lift C.M.U. Perimeter site walls with the following locations: 1) West wall from north end to 66' south of north end of wall. 2) North wall from west end to 72' east of north end of wall. 1 set 3 grout test samples fabricated at north and west wall intersection, Ticket #87029, Truck #376. Observed lay-up 8 courses exterior C.M.U. Control House walls, (north, south, east and west). Observed proper mixing and handling of mortar. Observed proper placement of reinforcing steel. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. LAW/CKANDALL, INC. 10037 BARNES CVN. RD. SUITE A SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619) 458-9379 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB NO: JOB NAME: JOB ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: S91007.MX Palomar Substation 1925 Camino Vida Roblcs Roel Construction TYPE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: Masonry PLACE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: DATE: 10/20/92 REPORT NO: 4 WEATHER: SDG&ENO: 5928310 PLAN NO: APPLICATION NO: Material Description ASTM C-90 Type I grade N.C.M.U.. Mortar Type M 2.500 psi. Grout 2.000 psi, ASTM A6]5. Grade 60 reinforcing steel Page 2 of 3 10/13/92 Observed placement of 9 cu. yds. Premix Grout Mix #51-3154 at 1st lift C.M.U. perimeter site walls with the following locations: 1) West wall from 66' south of north end, to 56' north of south end of wall. 1 set 3 grout test sample of fabricated 70' north of south end of wall, Ticket #87250, Truck #210. Observed proper handling and consolidation of grout. Observed lay-up 8 courses C.M.U. perimeter site walls at north wall, from 94' east of west end of wall to east end of wall. Observed proper mixing and handling of mortar. Observed proper placement of reinforcing steel. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications, 4/92 Observed placement 9 cu. yds Premix Grout Mix #51-3154 at 1st lift Control House C.M.U. walls. 1 set 3 grout test samples fabricated southeast corner of bldg., Ticket #87488, Truck #372. Observed proper handling and consolidation of grout. Observed lay-up 8 courses C.M.U. perimeter site walls at East wall from north end to south end. Observed proper mixing and handling of rnortar. Observed proper placement of reinforcing steel. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. 10/15/92 Observed placement of 9 cu. yds Premix Grout Mix #51-3154 at C.M.U. Perimeter site walls at 1st lift north perimeter wall from 94' east of west end, to 260' east of west end of wall. 1 set 3 grout test samples fabricated 156' east of west end of wall, Ticket #87856, Truck #367. Observed proper handling and consolidation of grout. Observed lay-up 8 courses C.M.U. Control House walls to top of wall. 1 set 3 mortar test samples fabricated, top of wall, northeast corner of bldg. Observed proper mixing and handling of mortar. Observed proper placement of reinforcing steel. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. 10/16/92 Observe placement 9 cu. yds Premix Grout Mix #51-3154 at 1st C.M.U. perimeter site walls at west wall, from south end to 56' north. South wall, from west end to 88' east of west end of wall. 1 set 3 grout test samples fabricated at south and west wall intersection, Ticket #88189, Truck #200. Observed lay-up 3 courses C.M.U. retaining walls at Control House cable trench north, south, east and west sides of bldg. 1 set 3 mortar test samples fabricated, center of south wall, 2nd course above top of footing. Observed lay-up 8 courses C.M.U. perimeter site wall (south) from 88' east of west end of wall to 144' east of west end of wall. Observed proper mixing and handling of mortar. Observed proper placement of reinforcing steel. The observed work complies with the approved plans and r -'fications. 10037 BARNES CYN. RD. SUITE A SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619) 458-9379 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB NO: JOB NAME: JOB ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: S91007.MX Palomar Substation 1925 Camino Vida Roblcs Rod Construction TYPE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: Masonry PLACE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: DATE: 10/20/92 REPORT NO: 4 WEATHER: SDG&ENO: 5928310 PLAN NO: APPLICATION NO: Material Description ASTM C-90 Type I grade C.M.U.. Mortar Type M 2.500 psi. Grout 2.000 psi. ASTM A615. Grade 60 reinforcing steel Page 3 of 3 Matt Martinek Inspector/Technician 510 Reg No. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Craig Riker Roel Construction REVI Anftony M. Rychel/RCE 47799 Project Engineer / LAW/CRANDALL, INC. 10037 BARNES CANYON ROAD, SUITE A, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92121 (619) 458-9379 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB NO: S91007.MX DATE: 10/20/92 JOB NAME: Palomar Substation REPORT NO: 7 JOB ADDRESS: 1925 Camino Vida Robles WEATHER: CONTRACTOR: Roel Construction SDG&E NO: TYPE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: Reinforced Masonry PLAN NO: PLACE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: APPLICATION NO: Page 1 of 2 Material Description C90 CMU Block. C270 Mortar. A615 Reinforcing Steel. C94 Ready Mixed Concrete 10/19/92 Observed the placement and consolidation of 18 cubic yards of Pre-Mixed Concrete Company grout mix design 513154 in the second lift to 12'-8" in the Control House walls, in the first lift to 5 1-4" of the easterly 32' of the north enclosure wall and northerly 40' of the east enclosure wall. Made three grout test cubes form the Control House east wall. Samples taken from truck 403, ticket #88732. Observed the lay-up and inspected the reinforcing steel installation in the first lift to 5'-4" of the easterly 112' of the south enclosure wall. PKserved the lay-up and inspected the reinforcing steel installation in the firstl ift to 5'-4'l of the easterly 112' of the i enclosure wall. Ine observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. 10/21/92 Observed the placement and consolidation of nine cubic yards of Pre-Mixed Concrete Company grout mix design 513154 in the second lift to 12'-0" of the westerly 74' of the north enclosure wall and the northerly 34' of the west enclosure wall. Made three grout test cubes from the wall 20' east of the northwest corner. Samples taken from truck 385, ticket #89466. Observed the lay-up and inspected the reinforcing steel installation in the second lift to 12'-0" of the west enclosure wall south form 56' to 168'. Made three mortar test cups from the second lift 84' to 112' south of the northwest corner. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. 10/20/92 Observed the placement and consolidation of nine cubic yards of Pre-Mixed Concrete Company grout mix design 513154 in the first lift to 6'-0" of the south enclosure wall east from 88' to 206'. Made three grout test cubes from the wall at 147'. Samples were taken from tuck 355, ticket #89082. Observed the lay-up and inspected the reinforcing steel installation in the second lift to 12'-0" of the westerly 74' of the north enclosure wall and the northerly 56' of the west enclosure wall. Made three mortar test cups from the northerly 56' of the west wall. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. 10/22/92 "' -erved the placement and consolidation of nine cubic yards of Pre-Mixed Concrete Company grout mix 513154 in second lift to 12'-0" of the west enclosure wall south from 34' to 144'. Made three grout test cubes from t he wall 122' south of the northwest corner. Samples taken from truck 391, ticket #89754. Observed the lay-up and inspected the reinforcing steel installation in the second lift to 12'-0" of the west enclosure wall south from 168' to the southwest corner and the westerly 88' of the south enclosure wall. Made three mortar DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB NO: JOB NAME: JOB ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: S91007.MX Palomar Substation 1925 Camino Vida Robles Roel Construction TYPE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: Reinforced Masonry PLACE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: DATE: 10/20/92 REPORT NO: 7 WEATHER: SDG&E NO: PLAN NO: APPLICATION NO: Page 2 of 2 test cups from the top three courses of the westerly 88' of the south wall. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. 10/23/92 Observed the placement and consolidation of 23 cubic yards of grout mix design 513154 in the second lift to 12'-0" of the south 91'-4" of the west enclosure wall and the west 144' of the south enclosure wall, the first lift to 5'-4" of the south enclosure wall east from 200' to 288'. Made three grout test cubes from the west enclosure wall 10' north of the southwest corner. Samples taken from truck 201, ticket #90055. Observed the lay-up and inspected the reinforcing steel installation in the second lift to 12'-0" of the south enclosure wall east from 88' to 256'. Made three mortar samples from the top two courses east form 144' to 172'. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. .jam McGee Inspector/Technician 318 Reg No. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Craig Riker Roel Construction REVI Antrlony M. Eychel.^RCE 47799 Project Engineer i i. — r--^" / <$-F 5" Le ROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants 10037 Barnes Canyon Road, Suite A • San Diego. CA 92121 • (619)458-9379 One of the law companies DAILY FIELD REPORT Project Name Project Address Engineer LC & A No (/£>A L_ Bldg. Permit No. ^2,^ 7/7 Plan File No. Contractor Material Description A i/ST fts DATE + 7 r& f-tz/sic? <SfT?e.( //7 ST~< T&t osicz r c>r TO***- L*5T efis ~r £> 0 V ^ f ''sj£<2s£>&trArL <5+ T ~J ~ * fT ~w HOURS WORKED: INSPECTOR/TECHNICIAN REVIEWED BV: . WO. Le ROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants 10037 Barnes Canyon Road. Suite A • San Diego. CA 92121 • (619) 458-9379 One of the law companies DAILY FIELD REPORT Project Name Project Address Engineer Contractor Y//£>A LC&A No. Bldg. Permit No. Plan File No. Type of Inspection Material Description c& CMCf Stock C2W DATE %e/KJ=OR&M$ f •£•0T &-u r -r ??-<?S*T &-tf •&* -Zhe /?• U> /2-Q' r r-<2s- (t tf rz-J-. HOURS WORKED: INSPECTOR/TECHNICIAN REG. NO. y Le ROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants 10037 Barnes Canyon Road. Suite A • San Diego. CA 92121 • (619) 458-9379 One of the law companies DAILY FIELD REPORT Project Name Project Address Engineer 1///£>A Contractor Bldg. Permit No. Plan File No. Type of Inspection Material Description £ f ° CMC/ &£&Ck C2.7& ' DATE n &r /?/ ? &T //*.'*? oi we- rz/-3*r L/' /n wt-e&. 4i-t><>>a T* 31S.r ~&> -f&u? *' ]& 7^7 32- HOURS WORKED: INSPECTOR/ TECHNICIAN REVIEWED REG. NO. Le ROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants 10037 Barnes Canyon Road, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92121 * (619) 458-9379 One of the law companies DAILY FIELD REPORT Project Name LC&A No. Project Address Engineer //z>A Contractor Material Description *=L* Bldg. Permit No. 92-~ 7/9 Plan File No. W# Type of DATE i w -t Ttr Lo ,(& r tt r ussr rr£>tn T TT iS-f-a* It *--£-/&'-* in TO -f T?- Ut rtv £x=* jPl< '! HOURS WORKED: INSPECTOR/ TECHNICIAN 3/A REG. NO. Le ROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES Geotechnical Consultants 10037 Barnes Canyon Road, Suite A • San Diego, CA 92121 • (619)458-9379 One of the law companies DAILY FIELD REPORT p Project Name 1 #*• Project Address Engineer Contractor J&A LC&A No Bldg. Permit No. 7^-~ Plan File No. Type of Inspection '- /V\X" Material Description DATE t-et^C + 7#«- &o^t ^r T?- le**&f~7/7 tf Z% t -fr 52 ~V?Ttew $C U >fc HOURS WORKED: INSPECTOR/TECHNICIAN REVIEWED 3/a REG. NO. t-A ^ /CKA.NUALL, iAC. 10037 BARNES CVN. RD. SUITE A SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619) 458-9379 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB NO: JOB NAME: JOB ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: S91007.MX Palomar Substation 1925 Camino Vida Roblcs Roet Construction TYPE OF INSPECTIONyTESTING: Concrete PLACE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: Material Description F'C 3.000psi. ASTM A615 Grade 60 DATE: REPORT NO: WEATHER: SDG&E NO: PLAN NO: APPLICATION NO: 10/20/92 5 592S310 10/9/92 Observed placement 129 yds. Premix concrete mix #506827 at perimeter C.M.U. wall footing with the following locations: 1) North wall footing from east end to 32' west 2) East wall footing from north end to south end, 1 set 4 concrete test samples fabricated 100' south of north end, Ticket #86581, Truck #385. 3) South perimeter wall footing from east and to 200' west, 1 set 4 concrete test samples fabricated 75' west of east end of wall, Ticket #86638, Truck #358. Observed proper placement of reinforcing steel prior to placement of concrete. Observed proper handling and consolidation of concrete. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. 4/92 L served placement 12 cu. yds. premix concrete mix #50-6827 slab on grade, C.M.U. wall footings at control House cable trench, north, south, east, west sides of building 1 set 4 concrete test samples fabricated at northwest corner, Ticket #87482, Truck #399. Observed proper placement of reinforcing steel prior to placement of concrete. Observed proper handling and consolidation of concrete. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. Matt Martinek Inspector/Technician 510 Reg No. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Craig Riker Roel Construction REVIEWED Ant Project En 47799 LAW/CRANDALL, INC. 10037 BARNES CVN. RI). SUITE A SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 (619) 458-9379 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB NO: S91007.MX JOB NAME: Palomar Substation JOB ADDRESS: 1925 Camino Vida Robles CONTRACTOR: Rocl Construction TYPE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: Concrete PLACE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: DATE: in/20/92 REPORT NO: 6 WEATHER: SDG&ENO: 5928310 PLAN NO: APPLICATION NO: Material Description Sunnlicr=Prcmixcd. mix design = 506827. PSI = 4.000. Slump = 4" 10/6/92 Inspected the placement of concrete at the following locations: Pads A,B,C control room floor, Pier G 2nd from east end, C.M.U. wall on west wide, western half of the north and south sides. Sample A: Slump = 4 1/4, temp = 81°F, ticket #85761, truck #357 4 test cylinders at 45 yd3 of 215 + yd3, mixer time = 1 hour. Sample B: Slump = 4 1/2, temp = 81°F, ticket #85804, truck #415 4 test cylinders at 140 yd3 of 215 + yd3, mixer = 1 hour. ie C: Slump = 3 1/2, temp = 84°F, ticket #85862, truck #415 4 test cylinders at 200 yd 3 of 215 + yd 3 mixer = 3/4 hour. Geo Cantrell Inspector/Technician 412 Reg No. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/CraigRiker Roel Construction REVIEWED B Anthony M^KychelyRCE 47799 Project Engineer / LAW/CRANDALL, INC. 10037 BARNES CANYON ROAD. SUITE A, SAN DIEGO .CA. 92121 (619)458-9379 DAILY FIELD REPORT Off- JOB NO: JOB NAME: JOB ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: S91007.MX Palomar Substation 1925 Camino Vida Robles Roel Construction TYPE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: Reinforced Concrete PLACE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: DATE: 10/20/92 REPORT NO: 3 WEATHER: SDG&E NO: 5928310 PLAN NO: APPLICATION NO: Material Description Mix Design 50-6827 10/1/92 Observed placement of mix design 50-6827 for transformer pads at SDG&E Sub Station Palomar. A total of 38.0 cubic yds placed for transformer pads and one set of four cylinders cast. Andy Sekas Inspector/Technician 49526 Reg No. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Craig Riker Roel Construction REVIE Anthony M. Rychel, Project Engineer E 47799 LAW/CRANDALL, INC. 10037 BARNES CANYON ROAD. SUITE A. SAN DIEGO ,CA- 92121 (619)458-9379 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB NO: JOB NAME: JOB ADDRESS: CONTRACTOR: S91007.MX Palomar Substation 1925 Camino Vida Robles Reel Construction TYPE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: Concrete PLACE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: DATE: 09/21/92 REPORT NO: 1 WEATHER: SDG&E NO: 5928310 PLAN NO: APPLICATION NO: 9/16/92 Inspected the placement of concrete in "N" piers, with a slump of 4-inches, temperature of 83°F. ticket #81312, truck 409, and the time in mixer was one hour. One set of four cylinders was taken at 9.5 yards of a total of 66.5 yards located. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. George Cantrell Inspector/Technician '. 92 4 hours DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Craig Riker Roel Construction 412 Reg No. REVIEWED BY: AntRQftyMjRychei, RCE 47799 Project Engineer / CLIENT: LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Stc A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT San Diego Gas & Electric DATE: 10/19/92 PROJECT: Palomar Sub Station 1925 Camino Vida Roblc; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506827 MIX DESC: CONCRETE FIELD INFORMATION- DATE SAMPLED: 9/16/92 BY: Cantrell JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 21802 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 4,000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/5 TRUCK/TICKET: 81312/409 SAMPLED: 10:50AM DATE RECEIVED: 9/17/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,0?: (Actual) (Specified) 4" 83° COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 9/23/92 10/14/92 10/14/92 11/15/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 111,000 128,000 126,000 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 3,930 4,550 4,460 Discard FRACTURE TYPE C A A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS' •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMTRESSrVESTRENGTH FRACTURETVPE1SINDJCATEDBYLETTER(A)CONE (B) CONE 4 SPLIT (C) CONE * SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: N piers SMP at South East pier. REMARKS: Load no. 1, sampled at 5 cubic yds of 70. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) James Copley, RQE 1522 CLIENT: LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Stc A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT San Diego Gns & Electric DATE: 10/22/92 PROJECT: Palomar Sub Station 1925 Cnmino Vida Roblc; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506827 MIX DESC: CONCRETE FIELD INFORMATION JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 21832 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 4,000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 9/21/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/6 TRUCK/nCKET: 82319/408 DY: Malt Mariinck SAMPLED: 7:45AM DATE RECEIVED: 9/22/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.'F: (Actual) (Specified) 4" 78° COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SO. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 9/28/92 10/19/92 10/19/92 11/20/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 84,500 118,000 114,500 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 2,990 4,170 4,050 Discard FRACTURE TYPE A D C UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.' •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD < < ^DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSFVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (D) CONE A SPLIT (C) CONE * SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: Caissons "G'S" most southernly on site. REMARKS: Sampled at 19.5 cubic yards of 39.0 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) James Copley, RQE 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Stc A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: Sim Dicj;o Gas & Electric PROJECT: Palomnr Sub Station 1925 Camino Vida Roble; Carlsbad, CA MIX 10: 506827 MIX DESC: CONCRETE FIELD INFORMATION- DATE SAMPLED: 9/24/92 BY: A. Sckas DATE: 10/23/92 JOB NO: S91GQ7MX LAB NO: 21858 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 4,000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/5 TRUCK/TICKET: 83244/378 SAMPLED: 8:OOAM DATE RECEIVED: 9/25/92 COMPRESSION SLUMP JNa-IES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,°F: TEST RESULTS (Actual) (Specified) 2W 81* CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28-27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 10/1/92 10/22/92 10/22/92 11/23/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 92,500 118,500 123,000 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 3,270 4,190 4,350 Discard FRACTURE TYPE A A A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING A5TM TEST METHODSO9.Clia.CW3.C173.C10M -DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENQTES LOWCOMTRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER(A) CONE (B)CONE*STUT (C) CONE ft SHEAR (D)SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: End pier #2 REMARKS: Load No. 1 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) RES; James Cdpley, RQE 1522 CLIENT: LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Stc A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT San Diego Gas & Electric DATE: 10/29/92 PROJECT: Palomar Sub Station 1925 Camino Vida Roblc; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506827 MIX DESC: CONCRETE — FIELD INFORMATION JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 21907 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 4,000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 9/29/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Prc-Mix/5 TRUCK/TICKET: 84381/356 BY: G. Moore SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: 9/30/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.'F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 10/6/92 10/27/92 10/27/92 11/28/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 97,000 121,000 125,000 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 3,430 4,280 4,420 Discard FRACTURE TYPE A A B UNLESS OTHERWISE 1KDICATED.' 'DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMFRESSIVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYTE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE * SPLIT (C) CONE * SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: The north western most piling REMARKS: DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Jamtfs Copley, RQE 1522 CLIENT: LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT San Diego Gas & Electric DATE: 11/10/92 PROJECT: Palomar Sub Station 1925 Camino Vida Roble; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506827 MIXDESC: CONCRETE FIELD INFORMATION JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 21926 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 3,000 PSI FIELD TESTS DATE SAMPLED: 10/1/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/5 TRUCKmCKET: 409/84862 BY: Andy Sekas SAMPLED: 7:25AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/2/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP, ° F: (Actual) (Specified) 6" 81 COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 10/08/92 10/29/92 10/29/92 11/30/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 100,000 117,500 124,500 Discard COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 3,560 4,160 4,400 FRACTURE TYPE C C B UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS;C39.C138,C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD « < DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: Transformer pad. REMARKS: DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED ies Copley, RQE 1522 CLIENT: LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT San Diego Gas & Electric DATE: 11/10/92 PROJECT: Palomar Sub Station 1925 Cam!no Vida Roble; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506827 MIX DESC: CONCRETE FIELD INFORMATION- DATE SAMPLED: 10/6/92 BY: Cantrell JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 21960 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 4,000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/5 TRUCKmCKET: 85862/415 SAMPLED: 12:24PM DATE RECEIVED: 10/7/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,' F: (Actual) (Specified) 31/:" 84' COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 ^ 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 10/13/92 11/03/92 11/03/92 12/5/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 112,500 126,500 135,500 Discard COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 3,980 4,470 4,790 FRACTURE TYPE C A A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C133.C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN HELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE i SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: Concrete placement at Northeast corner of control building. Slab at CMU wall South West corner. REMARKS: Load no. 21, sampled at 200 cubic yds of 215 10 gallons of water added. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED LAW/CRANDALL 1003"7 Barnes Cyn. R1. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: San Diego Gas & Electric PROJECT: Palomar Sub Station 1925 Camino Vida Roble; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506827 MIXDESC: CONCRETE FIELD INFORMATION- DATE SAMPLED: 10/6/92 BY: Cantrell DATE: 11/10/92 JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 21959 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 4,000 PSI FIELD TESTS TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/5 TRUCK/TICKET: 85804 SAMPLED: 10:25AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/7/92 COMPRESSION SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP, ° F: TEST RESULTS (Actual) (Specified) 4W 81° CYLINDER " NUMBER i 1 2 3 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 10/13/92 11/03/92 11/03/92 12/5/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 97,500 121,500 124,500 Discard COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 3,450 4,300 4,400 FRACTURE TYPE C A A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138.C143,C173,C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: Sampled at CMU wall north west corner. REMARKS: Load no. 5, sampled at 140 cubic yds of 215, 10 gallons of water added. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: San Diego Gas & Electric PROJECT: Palomar Sub Station 1925 Camino Vida Roble; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506827 MIX DESC: CONCRETE FIELD INFORMATION- DATE SAMPLED: 10/6/92 BY: Cantrell DATE: 11/10/92 JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 21958 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 4,000 PSI FIELD TESTS : TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 8:25AM BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/5 TRUCK/TTCKET: 85761/357 DATE RECEIVED: 10/7/92 COMPRESSION SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP, ° F: 81° TEST RESULTS (Actual) (Specified) 41/4" CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 ^ 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 10/13/92 11/03/92 10/14/92 12/5/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 97,500 118,000 117,500 Discard COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 3,450 4,170 4,160 FRACTURE TYPE C A A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138.C143,C173,C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN HELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: Concrete placement at Northeast corner of control building. REMARKS: Load no. 5, sampled at 45 cubic yds of 215,15 gallons of water added. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED imes Copley, RQE 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: San Diego Gas & Electric PROJECT: Palomar Sub Station 1925 Camino Vida Roble; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506827 MIX DESC: CONCRETE FIELD INFORMATION DATE: 11/10/92 JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 22001 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 3,000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/9/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/5 TRUCK/TICKET: 86638/358 BY: Matt Martin ek SAMPLED: 9:45AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/12/92 SLUMP,INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,' F: (Actual) (Specified) 6" 81 COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 10/16/92 11/06/92 11/06/92 12/8/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 87,500 117,000 110,000 Discard COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 3,100 4,140 3,890 FRACTURE TYPE C B B UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.CI3S.C143.CI73,C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: South perimeter C.M.U. wall footing 75ft west of east end. REMARKS: Sampled at 96.5 cubic yards of 129, Permit No. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED dmes Copley, ROE 1522 LAW/CR^NDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: San Diego Gas & Electric PROJECT: Palomar Sub Station 1925 Camino Vida Roble; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506827 MIX DESC: CONCRETE FIELD INFORMATION DATE: 11/10/92 JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 22002 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 3,000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/9/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/4 TRUCK/TICKET: 86581/385 BY: Matt Martin ek SAMPLED: 8:45AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/12/92 COMPRESSION SLUMPUNCHES: AIR. PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP, * F: 79 * TEST RESULTS (Actual) (Specified) 4" CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 10/16/92 11/06/92 11/06/92 12/8/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 81,500 104,500 109,500 Discard COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 2,880 3,700 3,870 FRACTURE TYPE A B B UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS :C39.CI3S,C143,C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE i SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: East Perimeter C.M.U. wall footing 100ft south of north end. REMARKS: Sampled at 38.50 cubic yards of 129, Permit No. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED mes Copley, RQ£ 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT San Dic"» G:is & Electric DATE: 11/18/92 PROJECT: Palomar Sub Station 1925 Camino Villa Roblc; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506827 MIX DESC: CONCRETE . FIELD INFORMATION JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 22049 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 3,000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/14/92 BY: M. Martinek TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 730AM BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/Mission Valley TRUCK/TICKET: 87482/399 DATE RECEIVED: 10/15/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR. PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,' F: (Aclual) (Specified) 4" 76" COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER "! 1 2 3 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 10/21/92 11/11/92 11/11/92 12/13/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 103.000 137,500 127,000 Discard COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 3,640 4.860 4,490 FRACTURE TYPE A A A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C13S.C14 3.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD < < <DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE £ SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: Slab on grade C.M.U. wall footings cable trench of control house. REMARKS: Sampled at 9.75 cubic yards of 12 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Jarfies Copley, RQE 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: San Diego Gas & Electric PROJECT: Palomnr Sub Station 1925 Camino Vida RoMe; Carlsbad, CA MIX ID: 506559 MIX DESC: CONCRETE FIELD INFORMATION DATE: 11/25/92 JOB NO: S91007MX LAB NO: 22146 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 3,000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/23/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Prc-Mix/5 TRUCK/TICKET: 90054/390 BY: W. McGcc SAMPLED: 7:35AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/26/92 COMPRESSION SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT. PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.'F: 81- TEST RESULTS (Actual) (Specified) 6" CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 4 DIAMETER (IN.) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 28.27 28.27 28.27 28.27 DATE TESTED 10/30/92 11/20/92 11/20/92 12/22/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 73,000 105,500 105,500 DISCARD COM P. STRENGTH (PSI) 2.580 3,730 3,730 FRACTURE TYPE A B B UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.CI3S.CU3.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD < < <DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE i SPLIT (C) CONE Si SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: Control house roof slab REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, load no. 1, cubic yards 9.5 of 9.5 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E (3) Pre-Mixed Concrete Company (1) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED es Copley, LAW/GRAND ALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 11/10/92 JOB NO:S91007.MX MIX ID: 51-3154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22017 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/12/92 BY:M. Martinek TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 8:OOAM BATCH PLANT: Premix/Escondido TRUCK/TICKET: 376/87029 DATE RECEIVED: 10/13/92 SLUMPJNCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MDC/AIR TEMP,c F: (Actual) (Specified) 10" 77° COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 3.05 3.09 WIDTH (IN.) 3.02 3.13 DEPTH (IN.) 9.21 9.67 DATE TESTED 10/19/92 11/9/92 12/11/92 TEST AGE PAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 16,500 26,000 Discard STRENGTH (psi) 1,790 2,690 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C13S,C143.C173,C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN HELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE &. SPUT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 1st lift C.M.U, perimeter sitewalls north and west wall intersection. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, cubic yards 9 of 9 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/BH1 Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Copley, RQE 152 LAW/CRANDALL 100.17 Names Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Subsl.-ilion ' DATE: 11/25/92 JOB NO:S91007.MX MIX ID: 513154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22033 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/13/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Prembc./Escondido TRUCK/TICKET: 210/87250 BY: M. Mjrtinek SAMPLED: fi:OOAM DATE RECEIVED:10/14/92 COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS (Actual) (Specified) SLUMP.INCHES: 10" AIR. PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT. PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,°F: 75° SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH ON.) 3.29 3.29 WIDTH (IN.) ,3.08 3.08 DEPTH (IN.) 10.13 10.13 DATE TESTED 10/20/92 11/10/92 12/1202 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 17.000 22.000 Discard STRENGTH (psi) 1.680 2.280 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138.C14XC173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN F1EI.D <«DENOTES LOWCOMI'RESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 1st lift west C.M.U. perimeter site wall, 70 ft north of south end of wall. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, cubic yards 9 of 9 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Jajnes Copley, RQE1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Stc A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDC&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/2/92 JOB NO:Syi(K)7.MX MIX ID: 51-3154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22050 SPECIFIED STRENGTH:2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/14/92 BY:M. Martinck TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 8:OOAM BATCH PLANT: Premix/Mission Valley TRUCK/nCKET: 372/87488 DATE RECEIVED: 10/15/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,°F: (Actual) (Specified) 9" 78' COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS . SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 3.10 3.08 WIDTH (IN.) 3.16 3.27 AREA (SQ.IN.) 9.80 10.07 DATE TESTED 10/21/92 11/11/92 12/13/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 20,200 27,500 Discard STRENGTH (psi) 2,060 2,730 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39,C138.C143.C173.C1064 "DENOTES CURED IN FIELD «<DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSJVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE &. SHEAR (D) SHEAR (£) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 1st lift control! house C.M.U. walls southeast corner of building. REMARKS: Permit no. 92719, cubic yards 9 of 9 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDC&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/2/92 JOB NO:S01007.MX MIX ID: 51-3154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22053 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/15/92 BY: M. Martinck TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 10/15/92 BATCH PLANT: Pre-mix/Mission valley TRUCK/TICKET: 367/87856 DATE RECEIVED: 10/16/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.'F: (Actual) (Specified) 75' COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS ' SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 3.14 3.11 WIDTH (IN.) 3.13 3.08 AREA (SQ.IN.) 9.83 9.58 DATE TESTED ioai/92 11/12/92 12/14/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 19,000 24,000 Discard STRENGTH (psi) 1,930 2,510 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39,C138.C143,C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE &. SPLIT (C) CONE &. SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 1st lift north C.M.U. perimeter site wall 156 ft west of east end of wall. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, cubic yards 9 of 9 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/BH1 Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Copley, RQ£ 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDC&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/2/92 JOB NO:S*U007.MX MIX ID: 51-3154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB N 0:22066 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED:10/16/92 BY:M. Martinck TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 7:50AM BATCH PLANT: Premix/Mission Valley TRUCK/TICKET: 200/88189 DATE RECEIVED: 10/19/92 SLUMIMNCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.'F: (Actual) (Specified) 9" 74< COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 1 LENGTH (IN.) 3.10 3.12 WIDTH (IN.) 3.12 3.24 AREA (SQ.IN.) 9.67 10.11 DATE TESTED 10/23/92 11/13/92 12/15/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 16,500 23,500 Discard STRENGTH (psi) 1,710 2.320 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED JN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METH ODS:C39.C13S.C 143.C173.C1064 -DENOTES CURED IN HELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE &. SPLIT (C) CONE &. SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 1st lift C.M.U. perimeter site walls at south and west wall intersection (corner) REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, cubic yards 9 of 9 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/BHI Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED mes Copley, RQE 4522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Humes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/2/9?. JOB NO:S91007.MX MIX ID: 513154 MIXDESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22I32 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/20/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mix/6 TRUCK/nCKET: 355/89082 BY: Busier SAMPLED: 8:15AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/21/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.-F: (Actual) (Specified) 9" COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 3.15 3.07 3.08 WIDTH (IN.) 3.09 3.09 3.09 AREA (SQ.IN) 9.73 9.49 9.52 DATE TESTED 10/27/92 11/17/92 11/17/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 28 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 15,000 22,500 22,500 STRENGTH (psi) U40 2370 2,360 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39,CI3S,C143.C173,C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE &. SPLTT (C) CONE &. SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 1st lift, south enclosure wall 147' from west end. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, cubic yards 9 of 9 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/BH1 Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED /Wes Copley, RQE *522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/2/92 JOB NO:S91007.MX MIX ID: 513154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22131 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/21/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mbced/6 TRUCK/TICKET: 385/89466 BY: Buster SAMPLED: 7:55AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/23/92 SLUMPJNCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,°F: (Actual) (Specified) 7.5" COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 3.22 3.20 3.04 WIDTH (IN.) 3.20 3.20 3.13 AREA (SQ.IN.) 10.30 10.24 9.52 DATE TESTED 10/28/92 11/18/92 11/18/92 TEST AGEPAYS) 7 28 28 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 16,000 22,800 21,200 STRENGTH (psi) 1,550 2,230 2,230 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39,C13S,C143.C173,C1064 •DENOTES CURED INFIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSJVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift of westerly 74' of north enclosure wall. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, Load no. 1, cubic yards 9 of 9 40 gallons of water added. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Hd. Sic A - Sun Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT MENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/2/92 JOB NO:S!>KK)7.MX MIX ID: £13154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22178 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/22/92 BY:Bustcr TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 7:45AM BATCH PLANT: Prc-Mixed/6 TRUCK/TICKET: 391/89754 DATE RECEIVED: 10/23/92 SLUMPJNCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.-F: {Actual) (Specified) 7" COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 1 ' LENGTH (IN.) 3.07 3.23 WIDTH (IN.) 3.09 3.26 AREA (SQ.IN.) 9.49 10.53 DATE TESTED 10/29/92 11/19/92 12/21/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 23,000 27,000 Discard STRENGTH (psi) 2,420 2360 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39,C138,C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE t SPLIT (C) CONE &. SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift enclosure wall 122' south of northwest corner REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, Load no. 1, cubic yards 9 of 9 50 gallons of water added. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3)RESRECTFULL ITTED LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/2/92 JOB NO:S01007.MX MIX ID: 513154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- DATE SAMPLED:10/23/92 BY:Busier LAB NO:22179 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-mvxed/5 TRUCK/TICKET: 20V90055 SAMPLED: 8:20AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/26/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.'F: (Actual) (Specified) 9.5" COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 331 3.11 WIDTH (IN.) 3.18 2.92 AREA (SQ.IN.) 10.53 9.08 DATE TESTED 10/30/92 11/20/92 12/22/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 19,000 22,400 Discard STRENGTH (psi) 1,800 2,470 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WrTH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138.C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED INFIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) COSE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE &. SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift of west enclosure wall 10' from southwest corner. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, load no. 1, cubic yards 9.00 of 9.00 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3)RE.SPECTFULLV SUBMITTED J/mes Copley, RQE 522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Hd. Sic A - S;m Pit-go, CA CONCRETE TEST REPORT ,IENT: SDC&E PROJECT: Palomar Substaiion DATF: 12/2/92 JOB NO:S'JKK)7.MX MIX ID: 513154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- DATE SAMPLED: 10/26/92 BY:Bustcr LAI1 NO:22K>3 SPECIFIED STRENGTIU2000 PS1 -FIELD TESTS- TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mbccd/5 TRUCK/TICKET: 203/90386 SAMPLED: 8:lOAM DATE RECEIVED: 10/28/92 SLUMPJNCHES: AIR, ]>ERCENT: UNIT WEI GHT.PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.'F: (Actual) (Specified) 9.75 COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 3.09 3.24 WIDTH (IN.) 3.24 3.05 AREA (SQ.IN.) 10.01 9.88 DATE TESTED 11/2/92 11/23/92 12/24/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 19,250 22.000 Discard STRENGTH (psi) 1,920 2.230 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138.C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMrRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE i SPLIT (C) CONE i SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift in south enclosure walleast from 172' to 200'. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, Load no. 1, cubic yards 9 of 9 DISTRIBUTION: ill Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Pulomar Substation DATE: 12/2/92 JOB NO:S91007.MX MIX ID: 513154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22Hi2 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED:10/27/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mixed/5 TRUCK/TICKET: 378/90617 BY: Buster SAMPLED: 9:OOAM DATE RECEIVED: 10/28/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,°F: (Actual) (Specified) 9.5 COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SAMPLE 1 NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 3.24 3.20 WIDTH (IN.) 3.19 3.22 AREA (SQ.IN.) 10.34 10.30 DATE TESTED 11/3/92 11/24/92 12/25/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 24,500 32,000 Discard STRENGTH (psi) 2370 3,110 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C13S.C143.C173.C10&4 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE <t SPLIT (C) CONE &. SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift of south enclosure wall east from 228 to 256' REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, Cubic yards 9 of 9,load no. 1 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED nes Copley, RQE 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sle A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 1/14/93 JOB NO:S91007.MX MIX ID: 513154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22224 SPECIFIED STRENGTH:2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 1Q/2S/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mixad/5 TRUCK/TICKET: 405/90871 BY:W. McGee SAMPLED: 8:10AM DATE RECEIVED: 11/3/92 SLUMP,INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,*F: (Actual) (Specified) 7" COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 3.11 3.03 2.99 WIDTH (IN.) 3.04 3.19 333 AREA (SQJN.) 9.45 9.67 9.96 DATE TESTED 11/4/92 11/25/92 12/27/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 25,000 19^00 40,000 STRENGTH (psi) 2.650 2,020 4,020 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS.-C39.C138,CU3,C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED INFIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLTT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift in north, enclosure wall east from 150' to 232' REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, Load no. 2, cubic yards 9 of 18 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED ames Copley, RQE 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/16/92 JOB NO:S91007,MX MIX ID: 513154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22229 SPECIFIED STRENGTH:2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/29,92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mixed/5 TRUCK/nCKET: 396/91207 BY:W. McGee SAMPLED: 750AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/30/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MLX/AIR TEMP,' F: (Actual) (Specified) 7.5" COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SAMPLE 1 NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 3.12 WIDTH (IN.) 3.07 AREA (SQ.IN) 9.58 9.42 DATE TESTED 11/5/92 11/26/92 12/28^2 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 26,000 28,400 Discard STRENGTH (psi) 2,710 3,010 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39,C138,Ci43,C173.Cl054 •DENOTES CURED IN HELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift in easterly 32-fof north enclosure wall. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719, Load no. 1, cubic yards 9 of 9 20 gallons of water added. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/BHI Hewitt (3)RESPEC Anthony/M. Rychel, RCE 47799 Proiect Engineer LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation MIX ID: 513154 MIX DESC: GROUT FIELD INFORMATION- DATE: 11/9/92 JOB NO:S91007.MW LAB NO: 21639 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2000 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 8/26/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Pre-Mixed TRUCK/TICKET: 398/76434 BY: G.Moore SAMPLED: DATE RECEIVED: 8/27/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.T: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS 1 SAMPLE NUMBER 1 2 3 LENGTH (IN.) 3.12 3.18 3.23 WIDTH (IN.) 3.40 3.42 3.41 DEPTH (IN.) 10.61 10.88 11,01 DATE TESTED 9/2/92 9/23/92 10/25/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 13,000 19,000 26.500 STRENGTH (psi) 1,230 1,750 2,410 UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENC7TH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SFL1T (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: South wall 9th course top of elevator south west corner to the 2nd central joint. REMARKS: Permit no. PC862, cubic yards 8 of 8 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/BU1 Hewitt (3)RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED mes Copley, RQE 1522 LAW/CRANDALL Barnes Cyn. Rd. S;e A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT alion DATE: 12/2/92 JOB NO:S*)HK)7.MX LAB NO:22224 SPECIFIC" STRENGTH:20(K) PSI FORMATION--FIELD TESTS- BY:W. McGec SAMPLED: 8:10AM DATE RECEIVED: 11/3/92 SLUMIMNCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP(°F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS WIDTH -N.) 04 3.19 AREA (SQ.IN.) 9.45 9.67 DATE TESTED 11/4/92 11/25/92 12/27/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 25,000 19,500 STRENGTH (psi) 2,650 2,020 -D, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST <DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH i" LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE &. SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR in north, enclosure wall east from 150' lo 232' 719, Load no. 2, cubic yards 9 of 18 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED Jafees Copley, RQIZ 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego. CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT T: SDG&E PROJECT: Piilumar Substation DATE: 11/23/92 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIXDESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:21971 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/7/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: RCP TRUCK/TICKET: HY: M. Martinek SAMPLED: 2:15PM DATE RECEIVED: 10/8/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT. PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP, * F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE TESTED 10/14/92 11/4/92 12/6/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 6,200 8,350 Discard COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 1,970 2,660 FRACTURE TYPE A B UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138.C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN HELD < < <DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPUT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: North concrete masonry unit perimeter site wall 3rd course above top of fooling 36fl east of west end. REMARKS: DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED James /RQTE 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Subslaiion DATE: 12/10/92 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIXDESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO: 22000 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELD TEST! DATE SAMPLED: 10/8/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: RCP TRUCK/TICKET: BY: M.Martinek SAMPLED: 2:15PM DATE RECEIVED: 10/9/92 SLUMP.INCHHS: AIR. PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP," F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 .3.14 DATE TESTED 10/15/92 11/5/92 12/7/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 4,800 5,200 7,900 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 1430 1,660 2,520 FRACTURE TYPE B D* C UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODSO9.C138.C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD «<DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: West perimeter site wall 5th course above top of footing 123 ft south of north end of wall. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-714 *Did not meet required strength at 28 days. DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED James Copley, RQE 1522 Senior. Engineer, LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/10/92 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIX DESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO: 22003 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 1CWAJ2 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: RCP TRUCK/TICKET: BY: M. Maninck SAMPLED: 11:30AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/10/92 SLUM JMN CUES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP, * F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2,00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE TESTED 10/16/92 11/6/92 12/8/92 TEST AGE pAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 5,550 7,550 8,650 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 1,770 2.400 2,750 FRACTURE TYPE A B C UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODSrf39.C138.C143.Cl 73.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: South perimeter Concrete masonry unit wall 8th course above lop of footing, 50ft cast of west end. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED James Copley, RQE 1522 Senior Engineer LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palo mar Substation DATE: 12/16/92 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIXDESC: MORTAR HELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22068 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/15/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: RCP TRUCIOTICKET: BY:M. Maninek SAMPLED: 1:45PM DATE RECEIVED: 10/16/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MDC/AIR TEMP/F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 ** DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE TESTED 10/22/92 11/12/92 12/14/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 4,850 7,700 8,650 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 1,540 2,450 2,750 FRACTURE TYPE C A A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39,C13S,C143,C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift top of wall Concrete Masonry Unit Control House northeast corner of building. REMARKS: Permit No. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/BH1 Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY SUBMI Anthony M.yRycbel, RCE 37799 Project Engineer LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/16/92 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIXDESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO: 22067 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELD TESTS- DATE SAMPLED: 10/16^2 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: RCP TRUCK/TICKET: BY: M. Martinek SAMPLED: 11:30AM DATE RECEIVED: 10/19/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP, "F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE TESTED 10/23/92 11/13/92 12/15/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 3,700 5,700 6,800 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 1,180 1,820 2,170 FRACTURE TYPE C c A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138.C143.C173,C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (3) CONE &. SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: South cable trench control house retaining wall 2nd course above top of footing. REMARKS; Permit no. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3) RES, Anthony^*). Ry/helr RCE Project Engineer LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cvn. Rd. Sic A - San Dii-m. CA 619-45S-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Subsli.fion DATE: 11/23/92 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIXDESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO:22123 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI FIELD TESTS DATE SAMPLED: 10/20/92 BY:BustL-r TIME HATCHED: SAMPLED: 1:151>M BATCH PLANT: Ross Masonry/Site TRUCK/TICKET: DATE RECEIVED: 10/23AJ2 SLUMP.1NCHES: AIR. PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT. PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP, • P: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE TESTED 10/27/92 11/17/92 12/19/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 6.700 9,450 Discard COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 2.130 3.010 FRACTURE TYPE A C UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C13S.C143.C173.C10W •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESS1VESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) COSE & SPLIT (C) CONE A SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift, west enclosure wall northerly 5<rf- REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Uill Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED J^mes CopIey.'RQE 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cvn. Rd. Sic A - S;m Dictm. CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Psiloimir Substation DATE: 1]/23/92 JOBNO:S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIX DESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION DATE SAMPLED:10/21/92 BY:Uuslcr TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 11:OOAM BATCH PLANT: Ross Masonry/Sue TRUCK/TICKET: Batch Mixer DATE RECEIVED: 10/23/92 LAB NO:22124 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELDTESTS- SLUMP.INC1IES: AIR. PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT. PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,c F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER : 1 2 «* DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE . TESTED 10/28/92 11/18/92 12/20/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 7,300 8,200 Discard COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 2.320 2,610 FRACTURE TYPE D A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C13S.C1«.CI73.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT <C) CONE i SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E> COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift 84-fio 112-fsouth along west enclosure wall REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bil! Hewitt (3) MITTED James Copley, RQE 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Biirncs Cvn. Rd. Sit A - San i. CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT v~,£NT: SDG&E PROJECT: P:i]omar Substation DATE: 11/23/92 JOB NO: S9I007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIX DESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION DATE SAM PLED: 10/22/92 BY: busier TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 1:25PM BATCH PLANT: Rose Masonry/Site TRUCK/TICKET: DATE RECEIVED: 10/23AJ2 LAB NO:22125 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELD TESTS- SLUM P.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.' F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE TESTED 10/29/92 11/19/92 12/21/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 4,250 6,750 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 1.350 2.150 FRACTURE TYPE A A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138,C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESS1VESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE &. SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: Top 3 courses of westerly 88' of South enclosure wall. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bi)l Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED lames Cop)£y, RQE 1522 LAW/CRANDALL 1003" Barnes Cyn. Rd. Sic A - San Diego. CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SOG&E PROJECT: Pulomnr Substation DATE: 1/11/93 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIX DESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO: 22180 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELD TESTS DATE SAMPLED:lO/23/92 BY:Busier TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 1:25PM BATCH PLANT: Ross Masonry/Sile TRUCK/TICKET: DATE RECEIVED: 10/26/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,°F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE TESTED 10/30/92 11/20/92 12/22/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 5.000 6.450 8,500 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 1.590 2,050 2,710 FRACTURE TYPE D A D UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138.C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE fB) COSE &. SPLIT (C) CONE i SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: Top 2 courses east from 144' to 172' of the south wall. REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED rames Copley, RQE 1522 Senior Engineer LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Stc A - Sim Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/2/92 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIXDESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO: 22164 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELD TESTS- BY: Busier SAMPLED: 1:45 pm (Actual) (Specified) DATE SAMPLED: 10/26/92 TIME BATCHED: BATCH PLANT: Ross Masonry/Site TRUCK/TICKET: Batch Mixer DATE RECEIVED: 10/27/92 COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP," F: CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE TESTED 11/2/92 11/23/92 12/24#2 TEST AGE PAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 5,700 9,000 Discard COMP, STRENGTH (PSI) 1,820 2,870 FRACTURE TYPE A C UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39,C138.C143,C173,C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (3) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift of north enclosure wall east form 94' to 150'. REMARKS: Permit No. 92-719, Plan File No. N/A DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY, SUBMITTED sw Janes Copley, RQE 1522 Senior Engineer LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT : SDG&E PROJECT: Palom«r Siibstiilion DATE: Jl/27/92 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIXDESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION DATE SAMPLED: 10/27/92 BY:Buster TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 1:45PM BATCH PLANT: Ross Masoniy/Sile TRUCK/nCKET: Batch Mixer DATE RECEIVED: 10/28/92 LAB NO: 22161 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELD TESTS- SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP, ° F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SO. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE TESTED 11/3/92 11/24/92 12/25/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 6,550 10.550 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 2,090 3,360 I-RACTURE TYPE E D UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C13S.C1«,C173.C1064 "DENOTES CURED IN FIELD < « DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE &. SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: Top 4 courses of north enclosure wall easterly 32' REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Bill Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED s Copley, RQE 1322 LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Stc A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT -JENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palomar Substation DATE: 12/2/92 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIXDESC: MORTAR HELD INFORMATION DATE SAMPLED: 10/28#2 BY: Buster TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 1:OOPM BATCH PLANT: Ross Masoniy/Silc TRUCK/TICKET: DATE RECEIVED: 10/29/92 LAB NO:22223 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI -FIELD TESTS- SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT, PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP,' F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 3 DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.14 DATE TESTED 11/4/92 11/25/92 12/27/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 6,350 9,100 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 2,020 2,900 FRACTURE TYPE C A UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138,C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN FIELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVESTRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (8) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE £ SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 1st 3 courses of 2nd lift in east wall south from 96' to 152' REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/BI11 Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED James Copley, RQE JJ522 Senior Engineer LAW/CRANDALL 10037 Barnes Cyn. Rd. Ste A - San Diego, CA 619-458-9379 CONCRETE TEST REPORT CLIENT: SDG&E PROJECT: Palontar Substation DATE: 1/11/93 JOB NO: S91007.MX MIX ID: Type M MIX DESC: MORTAR FIELD INFORMATION- LAB NO: 22225 SPECIFIED STRENGTH: 2500 PSI FIELD TESTS DATE SAMPLED: 10/29/92 BY:Busier TIME BATCHED: SAMPLED: 8:15AM BATCH PLANT: Ross Masonry/Site TRUCK/TICKET: DATE RECEIVED: 11/3/92 SLUMP.INCHES: AIR, PERCENT: UNIT WEIGHT. PCF: MIX/AIR TEMP.°F: (Actual) (Specified) COMPRESSION TEST RESULTS CYLINDER NUMBER 1 2 ji DIAMETER (IN.) 2.00 2.00 2.00 AREA (SQ. IN.) 3.14 3.14 3.H DATE TESTED 11/5/92 11/26/92 12/28/92 TEST AGE (DAYS) 7 28 60 MAX LOAD (LBS.) 5.250 7.250 8.600 COMP. STRENGTH (PSI) 1,670 2.310 2.740 FRACTURE TYPE C A D UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. TESTS WERE PERFORMED IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING ASTM TEST METHODS:C39.C138.C143.C173.C1064 •DENOTES CURED IN HELD <«DENOTES LOWCOMPRESSIVE STRENGTH FRACTURE TYPE IS INDICATED BY LETTER (A) CONE (B) CONE & SPLIT (C) CONE & SHEAR (D) SHEAR (E) COLUMNAR POUR LOCATION: 2nd lift of east enclosure wall south from 152' to 208' REMARKS: Permit no. 92-719 DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/BiH Hewitt (3) RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED imes Copley. RQE 1523 Senior Engineer LAW/CRANDALL, INC. 10037 BARNES CANYON ROAD, SUITE A, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92121 (619) 458-9379 DAILY FIELD REPORT JOB NO: S91007.MX JOB NAME: Palomar Substation JOB ADDRESS: 1925 Camino Vida Robles CONTRACTOR: Rocl Construction TYPE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: Welding PLACE OF INSPECTION/TESTING: DATE: 11/2/92 REPORT NO: 8 WEATHER: SDG&E NO: PLAN NO: APPLICATION NO: Material Description A36 Structural Steel. A446 Sheet Steel. E7018 Filler Metal 10/20/92 Visually inspected the field welding of the Control House roof beams, sheet steel decking and Nelson studs. The observed work complies with the approved plans and specifications. William McGee I" -ictor/Technician 318 Reg No". DISTRIBUTION: SDG&E/Craig Riker Roel Construction REVI Anthony M. Rych^l, RCE 47799 Project Engineer ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO. CA 92123 (619)560-1468 DATE:J? JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: C/T OF- 7/f PROJECT ADDRESS: /?25" PROJECT NAME: SP£»'g- £>&& SET: J_ tflbfr CHECKER DFILE C0py [jUPS FjDESIGNER The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified fi^2,&K^ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant Contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: X Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. y Esgil been Date staff did completed . contacted: REMARKS: 5^2 /. fii L Sfc^ers. advise Person applicant contacted that the plan Telephone # f^^'Ji- Cf Ti <?P •jfc - l/fiL 2. S^ ^ ft — - Tl»fiJ OF- P£#^ check ha A/ Ijt/L/ 1 - — r&~ 7 By;EnclosuresESGIL CORPORATION DGA DCM Datei Jurisdiction Prepared byi VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE Bldg. Dept. Esgil PLAN CHECK NO.. BUILDING ADDRESS . APPLICANT/CONTACT BUILDING OCCUPANCY £-2 / zr C/4A//V0 I/f £)*-_ afro MUM PHONE NO.'_7cWf") TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION V- DESIGNER PHONE CONTRACTOR PHONE BUILDING PORTION c.oA^r^^^ //^H^r Mto-^>oM&v\ isJAU. Air Conditionine Commercial Residential Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers Total Value BUILDING AREA %&O Sp (I, I&Z 5/= — -^ VALUATION MULTIPLIER -z&.&o £,^> 'e 0 e • - VALUE .!£> eP^£> 17 /.2.^ / • 9 ^ 4-2 3 Building Permit Fee $_ Plan Check Fee $ C 0 M HE NTSr SHEET / OF /12/87 PLANNING CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB37-7/f Address /^^'T CA^,*)Q L// Planner VAN LYNCH phone 438-1161 ext. 1325 (Name) APN: tl V ««• w wa a a 5 5 S g S S £ a a. Type of Project and Use _ Zone r fr) Facilities Management Zone •> Legend Lil Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified CBT3 D Environmental Review Required: YES J^_ NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: 7u*>& V'. if 92- Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required: YES X NO _ TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. JV/V DATE: PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES; Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions wiiich require action. Conditions of Approval 4-A*o Sc#P& ft^n S ( '£&AJO6f} /S>/zA ^ _ HHD D California Coastal Commission Permit Required: YES NO DATE OF APPROVAL: San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA. 92108-1725 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval _^ D D DD E'D D Landscape Plan Required: YES >C NO ___ See attached submittal requirements for landscape plans Site Plan: Zoning: 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. 2. Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes and driveway. 3. Provide legal description of property. 4. Provide assessor's parcel number. 1. Setbacks: Front: Int. Side: Street Side: Rear: 2. Lot coverage: Wc 3. Height: V^^J^ 4< Parkin?:l&*^ Guests Additional Comments uj/^f- /)cctsf>7~~ Required Required Required Required Required Required Spaces Required Spaces Required 5^ Shown // ' £ zr~ Shown ^r' «3£- Shown cg£- £y' Shown £JT' ££% Shown £&& 3-$T Shown ^fi/ ^ tfcyf±i&> '^ffr&^L; Qtfc-, ^^ Shown -^~ Shown '<uA&' /**Ffi>d**t&*J7~% 'P'fafjL. ^O Af>PfoiJ#C- && £J*"lO SC*fl£* P&s9«j£ fv£, /££&<0*/£&~' a/^ TSeJ/£0/**£ A^B-^f/TT OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER V- 4w^A -DATE PLNCK.FRM M JVi PLANNING CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB<f?~ 7/7 Address 1^2,^ CA**fM> Planner VAN LYNCH _ pnone 438-1161 ext. (Name) APN: Type of Project and Use teC-fee-Tfacfa- s u ~&t£.7&7ro *J Zone I **) Facilities Management Zone _ Legend t— rsj M« « * -M .W .*u y y r n g g S LLJ Item Complete g S S o. o. a. Item Incomplete - Needs your acdon 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified [FD D Environmental Review Required: YES Jj^. NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: T^^g' <J. If 92- Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval HoiDiscretionary Action Required: YES X NO APPROVAL/RESO. NO. ZV/V DATE: -TZ/y L PROJECT NO ^">-^-» 7 OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, £tate conditions w^uchjequire action. Conditions of Approval ^ApQ $c#Pff fta'* S B'D D California Coastal Commission Permit Required: YES _ NO ^ DATE OF APPROVAL: San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA. 92108-1725 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval _ _ __ City of Carlsbad^ ——p——^^^^————.———^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Engineering Department BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO. CB 92--O1 i 9 BUILDING ADDRESS: 192.5 O3M/NO V? CDMTC20L HOlRELPROJECT DESCRIPTION: *.'4 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 2-lZ-rV32L- i1^ _ EST. VALUE. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. BusS.S04E5E.IJ Date: Bv:5? 3CMEDR1 I By:.Date: ?0ft OFFlCAt USE ON&.Y ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement Agreement CONTACT PERSON NAME:. ADDRESS:. PHONE: P:\doaHahtot\bp0001 .frm REV 8/5/92 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 * (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-O894 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN Ej D D 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow D. Property Lines Easements B. Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets D D 2. Show on site plan: / QA.Drainage Patterns} C. Existing Topography B! Existing ft PiupuS&a Slopes D D D 3. Show on a section drawing or include a note stating that there is a minimum of 6" difference between the finished floor and the finished grade elevation adjacent to the structure. D D D 4. Include note: "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradient for no less than 5' [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)5]. * ***l/£, gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever is less). On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus two percent" (per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5.). D D 5. Include on title sheet A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: Total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION z oe>\JE*mv /^PRIVOS. c^u. our O7V P:\doos\ehktet\bp0001 .frm Page 1 of 4 REV 6/5/92 c,1 s BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKUST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 2ncK/ Srdv'istv 2ndv 3rdv 'jZL D D 6. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. CUP 52 - 03 =*£% Conditions were complied with by: Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS D D D 7. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: • Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by Date: M/A IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS D D D 8a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvements requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: P:\docs\ofikM\bp0001.frm Page 2 Of 4 REV 5/5/92 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 2ndv* 3rcV D D D 8b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future public improvements required as follows: H/D D D D 8c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return signed and notarized. Agreement to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: _____ D D D 8d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the Citv Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. D D D 9a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). D D D 9b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be Submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: D 9c. No Grading Permit required. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST P:\doM\ehMM\bp0001 .frm Page 3 Of 4 REV 6/5/92 MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 3rdV D D 10. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, trees, driveways. A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: Please complete attached Right-of-Way application form and return to the Engineering Department together with the requirements on the attached Right-of-Way checklist, at the time of resubmittal. D D D 11 . A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. D D D 12. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial waste permit accepted bv: Aegi vr_^ Date: P:\doct\ehkM\bp0001 .frm Page 4 of 4 REV 6/8/92 CALCULATIONS WORKSHEET EDU CALCULATIONS: EDU's: APT CALCULATIONS: ADT's: ZONE: FEE/EDU: D 5. PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE D 6. SEWER FEES PERMIT No. EDU's: FEE/EDU: BENEFIT AREA: ^^^_ FEE: 7. SEWER LATERAL REQUIRED (2,500 DEPOSIT) REMARKS: FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: D YES (NO BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE FEE, REDUCED TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE) DNO D 1. PARK-IN-LJEU FEE PARK AREA: FEE/UNIT: D 2TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's: FEE/ADT: D 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT's: FEE/ADT: D 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE P:\domVchktot\bp0001.1nn REV 6/5/92 City of Carlsbad 92109 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Wednesday. September 16,1992 Reviewed by: Contact Name Mark Chromyn Address 101 Ash st POBoxissi City, State San Diego CA 92112 Bldg. Dept. No. 92-719 Planning No. CUP92-3 Job Name Patomar Air. Substat Job Address 1925 Camino Vida Roble Ste. or Bldg. No. E3 Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1 st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID CFD Job# 92109 File* 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 City of Carlsbad 92109 Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Friday. July 31,1992 Reviewed by: Contact Name Mark Chromyn Address 101 Ash St POBox1831 City, State San Diego CA 92112 Bldg. Dept. No. 92-719 Planning No. CUP92-3 Job Name Palomar Air. Substat Job Address i925CaminoVidaRobie Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID CFD Job# 92109 File* 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3414 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF AN ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CAMINO VIDA ROBLE BETWEEN PALOMAR OAKS WAY AND PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. CASE NAME: PALOMAR SUBSTATION CASE NO: CUP 92-3 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning Commission did, on the 1st day of July, 1992, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider said application on property described as: Lot 5 of Carlsbad Tract No. 81-46 Unit No. 1, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to the Map thereof No. 11287, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County. WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to CUP 92-3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES CUP 92-3, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: Findings: 1. That the requested use is necessary and desirable for the development of the community since the substation will be providing electrical power for the - surrounding area, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the General Plan because the use is allowed through the Land Use 4 Element of the General Plan and by making available additional Public Facilities, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the 5 Planned Industrial Zone because the proposed use will operate above the performance standards of the zone.r 2. That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use since the proposed use will be confined to the site and that adequate 8 setbacks per Specific Plan 181 (A) have been provided for. 9 3. That the features necessary to adjust the requested use, such as increased setbacks and increased landscaping, to existing and permitted future uses in the Industrial Zone have been provided for and will be maintained. 4. That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle the 12 small amount of additional traffic generated by the use. 5. This project will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative - . Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on June 4, 1992 and Approved by the Planning Commission on July 1, 1992. In approving this 15 Negative Declaration the Planning Commission has considered the initial study, the staff analysis, all required mitigation measures and any written comments received 16 regarding the significant effects this project could have on the environment. 17a' 6. The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, ., g or new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan 19 prepared pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative 20 impacts created by the project. 21 7. This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has 22 been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 5. 23 Conditions:24 25 1- Approval is granted for CUP 92-3, as shown on Exhibit(s) "A" - "E", dated July 1, 1992, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department. 26 Development shall occur substantially as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions. 27 28 PC RESO NO. 3414 -2- 2. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of 1 the site plan as approved by the Planning Commission. The site plan shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The site plan copy shall be submitted to2 the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map, or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first. 4 3. This project is also approved under the express condition that the applicant pay the public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as 5 amended from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and « improvement plan and to fulfill the subdivided agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated March 18, 1992, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk 8 and is incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void. 9 4. Water shall be provided to this project pursuant to the Water Service agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, dated May 25, 1983. 12 5. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which may be required as part of the Zone 5 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 14 6. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the 15 payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in 16 Government Code Section 65913.5. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the 17 project without the condition complies with all requirements of law. 18 I 7. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the 19 1 Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance. 20 _ 8. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within two years from the date of project approval. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PC RESO NO. 3414 -3- 1 2 3«.* 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 CtXV 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9. This conditional use permit is granted for a period of 10 years. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Director on a yearly basis to determine if all conditions of this permit have been met and that the use does not have a significant detrimental impact on surrounding properties or the public health and welfare. If the Planning Director determines that the use has such significant adverse impacts, the Planning Director shall recommend that the Planning Commission, after providing the permittee the opportunity to be heard, add additional conditions to mitigate the significant adverse impacts. This permit may be revoked at any time after a public hearing, if it is found that the use has a significant detrimental affect on surrounding land uses and the public's health and welfare, or the conditions imposed herein have not been met. This permit may be extended for a reasonable period of time not to exceed 10 years upon written application of the permittee made no less than 90 days prior to the expiration date. In granting such extension, the Planning Commission shall find that no substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare will result because of the continuation of the permitted use. If a substantial adverse affect on surrounding land uses or the public's health and welfare is found, the extension shall be considered as an original application for a conditional use permit. There is no limit to the number of extensions the Planning Commission may grant. 10. If the property owner/owners' address changes from that which is shown on the conditional use permit application, a notice of a change of address shall be reported, in writing, to the Planning Department within 30 days. 11. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated and concealed from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets, in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and Building. 12. An exterior lighting plan including parking areas shall be submitted for Planning Director approval. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any impacts on adjacent homes or property. 13. No outdoor storage of material shall occur onsite unless required by the Fire Chief. In such instance a storage plan will be submitted for approval by the Fire Chief and the Planning Director. 14. The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, whichever occurs first. 15. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. PC RESO NO. 3414 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16. All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manual and submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning Department. 17. The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 18. The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plans, improvement plans and grading plans. 19. All landscape and irrigation plans shall show existing and proposed contours and shall match the grading plans in terms of scale and location of improvements. 20. 30% of trees in industrial and commercial projects shall be 24" box or greater. 21. Building identification and/ or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color. 22. As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24" x 36" blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan. Water Conditions: 23. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system shall be evaluated in detail to ensure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands are met. 24. The developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be collected at time of issuance of building permit. The San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for meter installation. 25. Sequentially, the Developers Engineer shall do the following: A. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection requirements. B. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the Planning Department for processing and approval. C. Schedule a meeting with the District Engineer for review, comment and nppmval nf flip ptrpliminsiry system laynnt usngp (fi_P-M_ - K.D.II.) plan for potable, reclaimed and sewer systems prior to the preparation of improvement plans. PC RESO NO. 3414 -5- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 26. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the water district serving the development determines that adequate water service and sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will continue to be available until time of occupancy. Building Conditions: 27. Building permits are required for walls that exceed 6 feet in height. Engineering Conditions: 28. The applicant shall obtain a right-of-way permit prior to or concurrent with issuance of a building permit. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1st day of July, 1992, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: Chairperson Erwin, Commissioner: Schlehuber, Schramm, Noble, Savary & Hall. None. ABSENT: Commissioner Welshons. ABSTAIN: None. TOM ERWIN, Chairperson CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: MICHAEL J. HOLZMIfcLER PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 3414 -6- SAN DIEGO FIBE DEPARTMENT 525 B STREET, SUITE 70S SAN DIEGO, CA S2101 (619) 533-44OO Hazardous Materials Information ADDRESS;BUSINESS NAME;' BUSINESS TYPE;PLAN FILE NUMBER:PHONE NUMBER: The following information shall be submitted for determination of occupancy group classification and/or a CEDMAT inspection declaration. Any deviations may require reclassification of this building. Mark any process or equipment listed below to be used inside or adjacent to building: Printing/Silkscreening Combustible Metal Chemical Storage Auto Repair - Dust Producing Metal Plating Spray Painting Ovens/Kilns Dip Tanks Welding/Cutting Flow Coaters Semiconductor Fab List (on page two) all of the following hazardous materials used or stored in your business: Explosives or Blasting Agents Compressed Gases Flammable and Combustible Liquids Flammable Solids Organic Peroxides Oxidizers Pyrophoric Materials Unstable (Reactive) Materials Water-Re active Materials Cryogenic Fluids Highly Toxic or Toxic Materials Radioactives Corrosives Other Health Hazards I hereby certify that the use, storage, or processing of hazardous materials will be limited as indicated on page two. Building Owner or Responsible Party: PLEASE PRINT NAM SIGNATURE DATE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION:DEPUTY FJRE MARSHAL:DATE: Notes; _ FPQ-SOO (fiov. 1O-9O)PAGE ONE enc'^*• —"o5crt "oi_ £ •8 *T 5) cd CO CO O5 ^<D T3 OO (D U_ E oM— 'c D <"1 c<DQ.D. 03V3 D oi Co (D O) CO Q. C O 5= 'o03 Q. CO •Z Oo> 01o_o D) ^1_ OooP3 Q. Oi_ C3 « oc D O c o w 3 .2™ J2 O CO "M'g sffl « E o to IT.t . en H JZ •zo H oo ^^ 1UO ^EEOH </i I SSIz ^o«< £-">• o §sSz o ^* — OT 1 z Oo d- i 1CXO Q.co-» ^u. 11 tS X E5 tftQ. ^ CLJ rf0-=- 1 zgz^ "Hog O CC UJ OHO, o" <fl O UJ Z <o E Xo 1 fVn1 1 V II i. 3 ^_ si^n XI] ^£eT11*.«*^•^ ^ ^<^'"^^ r\ ^*>^s •^^v ^SA*^_ i ^! ^j «• « ' S llS§ ^vS5 0j H LU 0<Q. City of San Diego Building Inspection Department Hazardous Materials Questionnaire Business Narne D Contact Persor It). G. Telepho Mailing Address P.O. &si State 93 HA Plan File # Site Address City State Cft Zip Permit # PART I: CITY OF SAN DIEGO FIRE DEPARTMENT - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION: OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION Indicate, by circling the item, whether your business will or did process or store any of the following hazardous materials. If any of the items are checked off, applicant must contact the Fire Department-Hazardous Materials Management Division, 525 B Street, Suite 705, San Diego, CA 92101. Telephone (619) 533-4400 prior to plan submittal. 1. Explosives or Blasting Agents 2. Compressed Gases 3. Flammable or Combustible Liquids 4. Flammable Solids 5. Organic Peroxides 10. 6. Oxidizers 11. 7. Pyrophorics 12. 8. Unstable (reactive) Materials 13. 9. Water-Reactives 14. Cryogenics Highly Toxic or Toxic Materials Radioactives Corrosives Other Health Hazards PART II: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HEALTH DEPARTMENT - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION: CONTINGENCY PLAN REVIEW If the answer to any of the questions is yes, applicant must contact the County of San Diego Health Department Hazardous Materials Management Division, 1255 Imperial Avenue, 3rd floor, San Diego, CA 92138. Telephone (619) 338-2222 prior to the issuance of a building permit. YES IS] CD JSI CDCDCD CD NO dH (FEE MAY BE REQUIRED)0Is your business type listed on the reverse side of this form?/v^/c ^ Will your business dispose of Hazardous Substances or Medical Wastes in any amount? CD Will your business store, or handle Hazardous Substances in quantities equal to or greater than 55 gallons, 500 pounds or 200 cubic feet of compressed gasTf&V&ftflM&R Cfrc. SI Will your business use an existing, or install an underground storage tank? S3 Will your business store, use or handle carcinogens, reproductive toxins, or Acutely Hazardous Materials? 1ST Will your business be located within 1,000 feet from the outer boundary of a school and handle Acutely Hazardous Matrials? CD For Demolition Permits Only: Does the building or structure for which this demolition permit is requested contain any friable asbestos? PART 111: SAN DIEGO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT If the answer to any of the questions is yes, applicant must contact the Air Pollution Control District, 9150 Chesapeake Drive, San Diego, CA 92113. Telephone (619) 694-3307 prior to the issuance of a building permit. YES CD NO 2. 3. S] Will the intended occupant install or use any of the equipment listed on the Listing of Air Pollution Control District Permit Categories, on the reverse side of this form. CD CD (ANSWER ONLY IF THE ANSWER TO QUESTION 1 IS YES.) Will the subject facility be located within 1 ,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school (Kthru 12) as listed in the current Directory of School and Community College Districts, published by the San Diego County Office of Education and the current California Private School Directory, compiled in accordance with provisions of Education Code Section 33190. CD CD For Demolition Permits Only: Does the building or structure for which this demolition permit is requested contain any friable asbestos? Briefly Describe Nature of the intended Business Activity: rftJ~OM#% 3lJ8Sf%1'iGH '- P</6tJC Name of Owner or Authorized Agent: So* Signature of Owner or Authorized and correct. enalty of perjury that to the best of my knowledge and belief the responses made herein are true Date: DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE FIRE DEPARTMENT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: BY:Date: EXEMPT.F.ROM PERf COUNTY- HMMD-* , ' ~- A ' ' ' ' ^^ (L ^f//9 1)$"*} \ J HIT REQUIREMENTS APCD ^Asm. APPROVED FOR BUILDING PER COUNTY HMMD MIT BUT NOT FOR OCCUPANCY APCD APPROVED FO COUNTY HMMD R OCCUPANCY APCD INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION &*7 '7/0*CB NO, S^v'// 7 SENo. APPLNQ, *te& IND. CLASS .::?.!- '.:-,'- -: V'..' ': ' " ' BUSINESS NAME. SITE ADDRESS. CONTACT PERSON {at business). PHONE NUMBER San Diego Gas and Electric Company Mark Chomyn, Land Planner (619) 696-2732 Type of Business (check all that apply) D Agricultural D Assembly D Automotive D Chemical Handling D Electronics DFood D Government D Laboratory D Laundry D Manufacturing D Medical D Metal Work D Office DESCRIBE WASTE OTHER THAN DOMESTIC (Chemicals, Particulates, etc.). D Photo Lab D Retail D Service Station D Warehouse[xj other Electrical Substation none DESCRIBE BUSINESS ACTIVITY:Electrical distribution substation GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ONSITE WASTEWATER PROCESSING: (chemical & physical characteristics). No wastewater processing will occur. Is business presently in operation at site? D YES E NO Has Wastewater Discharge Permit been applied for through the Encina Water Authority? D YES 0 NO Applicant's Name Mark Chomyn Please Print Title Land Planner Phone (619) 696-2732 Aaencv: San Diego Gas and Electric Company Signature: ' \1\flixi UUiWm Date U£Q Date Signature of (gjy Representative D EXEMPT 12^ NOT EXEMPT Date forwarded to Encina P:\DOCS\HISFQRMS\FRM00045 REV. 2/10/92 SDGJ PROJECT San Diego Gas & Electric FORM 111-152 (030270) 0489 SUBJECT PAGE. JOBNa COMPUTED BY CHECKED BY of PATE NT? ^^ | ^ DATE A, Cti0 O cut 4/f(of$7 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 C.agM?J. .Sop.vfc-f-rrv PAGP / JOB NO. 5?26J/O SUBJECT de?M.~T<£oL ^ ("^L<ULA~ 2- P<?M &RACO 5- U B S TAT COMPUTED BY ~ZNA . DATF^j ^//CHECKED BY DATE r7 /ia/^ !> C>- .<<-• -'-.T *•'••"•"%•'".'VX-'r^.Tj{ t_J.;N ''1}%\ ^?^?5*K^U«\';-T«a'tt?yii/P'&\m£,!s£L£7Q^& *^^~P/ C^VrV.*1' SDGJSan Diego Gas & Electric FORM 111-152(030270)0469 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE.Of JOB NO. COMPUTED BY CHECKED BY tz-PP .DATE. DATE we. -3-5- M. y 0- M-l C 0(0 v . t u is)o, SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT EPtfMCUO SUBJECT CZ^C1 MTrgjr> L H fJ-l PAGE. JOB NO. COMPUTED BY ] CHECKED BY of DATE DATE :> - L . r £ 3. 7. S, OADS LL . S. C ) =7 H(Mc e^oif. e-rc. J -=-7 ^ OL - -OL -r LL LL •Z. O . SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT f\ /3MC.UO SUBJECT PAGE. ft tJ JOB NO. COMPUTED BY_j£ CHECKED BY of DATE DATE MtffrL TypeBR HI FORM composite floor deck IV "-vtr.M deck urvon ol ite*1 ana Simon Prop*tri«i !p«r foot of widthi Oiul* M 10II 16 *,.,-: la.** 4... ll« Sd. "! 19 39 36 i II.*.In3 'S? : joe 353 .331 i*0 SSI .14* *>•>»«.. =),„;, Un Els" S3C MO 1650 2540 T.«OU» UM IBM 3190 SHU "End 9*»f.rg « 1.5" - lntBmi<diaie Bearing » t.5" 11) For end rtaetioni or lot eoneenlratrd loads on Ouie- «ndi of Caniiltv«ri - 1 5" Bearing. (21 For r«*ctioni of Jnt»f>o' tupoorri or for eone*ntrawd toadi located anvw^^r• on the joan - I 5" b«ar>ng. TABLE !9 - ALLOWABLE SUPERIMPOSED LOAD llbi.,;ia It.l FOR ASC TYPE BR Ml FOflM *.lh Cjn & J".".Vt. i 1 J2 J : 20HOPCr- ; ,8 16 i 124V ! 20 na'Cf j IB 16 22 * . :oijj ;>cr • ^H3 16 6'C' 2S5 3" 37!2" 3*3 "8 44S 443 290 3TB 373 376 Soan - c. c ct Swoon'tl 6'6" ' 7'0' ; ''6' j S'C | So" 1 9'Q" | 9'8" 253 • 226 • 2CJ ( 135 ISO J 136 , 124 330 . 295 : 266 7->: 321 ! 203 i 168 330 • 295 i ?6ti ' 242 231 ' 203 ' IBS 330 295 2G6 2^2 ?r 2C3 i?5 3CJ 2/2 . 2J5 20t • 131 j 165 < 150 ^9" 355 320 2T 256 231 ; 202 :S7 • 355 320 25: 256 22' 2C? 39' 355 ' 3?CJ 29' 266 ??i ?32 25? 220 183 ; 164 1*7 ' 133 I2l 335 3CC 2'i 246 200 : IB- ' 165 335 ' 300 27: JJg 7fX) • - ; S I^i 165 335 300 ?v 24* :c; -75- '65 I0'0" tu 154 171 171 137 1B6 186 186 itO (51 T51 '5 ' IT —l J n 104 152 155 159 126 171 171 171 101 139 139 ir- 1! 0' , ll'D , 12'0" 96 . 89 • B2 131 | !2' | 113 131 | 121 . HI 148 13S tH 116 107 59 ISa 146 , 136 153 , 46 < 136 158 46 [ 136 92 85 j 18 12B ! 18 109 12S j T8 109 12B ] 13 ! 109 o-2C LV 4 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 pnn.iECT KANCVIO flacMtL S«3&.t.Tii-r-r.nKJ PAGE r SUBJECT /* i u « ^UflMTg.ftL Hg(3«7& JOB NO. COMPUTED BY__J CHECKED BY Ol .DATE. DATE E>. ALLouiA&Le LOAD OM Deck C* TABLE 9 -VERTICAL LOAD f OH ASC TYPE 3R SMI Gjuqc 24 IB 24 Two 22 Spin 20 24 Thu'" " 22Msr, w " la 6'C" 65 79 93 120 74 93 121 169 92 113 137 187 Umtc'f T^ji L5W '0 L. • Sa»" - $•: 63 ' • 6'6" 7'0 ' • 7'S" 59 71 84 10: 68 86 112 156 83 101 122 166 53 • 45 64 53 75 62 97 79 38 45 S3 66 63 55 48 79 ! 68 1 59to: .39! 75 144 ' Ut ' 100 75 62 91 . 75 110 ! 9Q '49 ! 121 52 63 75 too L.L 1 PSP 3'SuBCO'tI B'C • i B'4 ' 33 39 45 56 42 52 64 ffl~- 45 S3 64 84 31 36 41 5T 39 48 41 48 57 76 9'Q" 9'6 ' 30 35 45 33 40 4B 62 34 40 62 32 39 31 37 44 57 32 37 44 57 105' 34 32 3? 46 33 37 48 <t. Deck TiUU , 7 P*r - V.O'Zr pT- r g.QS SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 S.I Vj sTd TaoMPROJECT SUBJECT C.OM"Tft.oL PAGE JOB NO. COMPUTED BY CHECKED BY . Cj _PATE DATE b. CHe^-k •' X= - $58 ;«." C* v = f i, 'A * 3*1 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 Su oPROJECT SUBJECT PAGE. JOB NO. COMPUTED BYj[_ CHECKED BY of DATE DATE C>. ^ , MO A v A Cxw e. ) op-'Peck. C. II ( 2x.y7ff*i.fO t J-K ¥6 = ^ /.»>'• L, (^-°^rAC /^., ^'**•*>* f 1^ rT^-: — r-; — — — i " * . .2- = lo ^ v" -. «* 7^ - z SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT ^ ATA£,UO Cftft ME.L S. l Vi SUBJECT e>M PAGE „ '- JOB, NO- ^ COMPUTED BY * CHECKED BY ot HATg DATE Z . CHECK /? ,<>/=• 0 -" <•* ^f+0 S. oo- Deck OK Ft* " _ 51, ., C SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT \?AlAgJ\Q ^MfcH^V, S O P SUBJECT f-i PAGE..16 JOB NO. COMPUTED BY *' CHECKED BY ol DATg DATE . C. Z. 4. ASC BfrHJ tOMtU o KAOHC.VL ( U CeHHtCTof^.5- I 4 ~b I'M • IM THXCkrie& > T>Gck 5: |vz tU. '»•». - I'M 1*4 . TH STeeL * 7" o,«s t+f . C. . R PC7F S -,3, it STeeL is MJG I/ SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 ' PROJECT SUBJECT (CfrMTf^flL . fc. 5. i. -' X * ' PAGE JOB NO. COMPUTED BY_Ji CHECKED BY ol DATE DATE .^Sm. oK <9K SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT ^AtX^Ao CiflftKVfel- S SUBJECT C.Qij"TVmV- Uoo*»g. PAGE o) JOB NO. COMPUTED BY CHECKED BY ?* -Si. & DATE C.HoMgM-r«b - tf-flrsc K/ 7* 9 O FT. S. 1(vu 5 .H A* \/ l0^oTy\ op o^j be. -r C 10 0 * o SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT f?.AVACUC7 CdfcMfeL ^ SUBJECT PAGE. JOB NO. COMPUTED BY_£j CHECKED BY of DATE DATE A . r "Z4.0 . A &-o'' . -2V AS/ i C %. ~ I. (LL) o^ OS- Lr T PAQ = , O , O SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT *»-rc\TTUPvJ PAGE 0( JOB NO. COMPUTED BY 2 -tf. fl DATE CHECKED BY DATE . r. 4 •= t S.H2 .I t 5 .l t i Vv> 7-67 Si = 5/3.3 - ^,67 *'**. COHC&GT& 4uo 5 Te&L M«, -«,,5 xi-y - 73/35" /v.5^ '5,2. ^^ 5- 4. ^ b. , 5 A /,-TTT r SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT HOU*>€. PAGE.of JOB NO. COMPUTED BY *\~tLQ. DATE CHECKED RY DATE r MODULI. : *M 'pu-tLC ' K>: SeL&c-T I^H .'rt> -t - o. , <?.3»MM. OKAp&^T -,^*-/ py- Y d = m Yb = t2. n. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PAGE PROJECT Jgj^rjcH'P dflg>-fe L ^ofevr<ftT'£oj^j JOB NO. SUBJECT OoKJTXpL HoQJgjL COMPUTED BY ?. 7*.4^ DATEs CHECKED BY DATE. H . 2 . b * ^e-Te.ig.^n^ic: ^U.»uJALU. 4Z&C l-^l-Y- ?. 1.0 I - - •— 5/t? x i D rr c>» - \i 0,000 co UmwaL) o^ TL ^ I O.^f IC^I ^4.- 20,1-^krsiS & * STVteL I a /OX It. - - SAN DIEGO GAS & EtECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT K6WL1A& £-*C.r-\tA. SUBJECT PAGE.of JOBNO. COMPUTED BY ^- &?. Cf. DATE CHECKED BY.DATE JIL , 6, 2 , STeel '|H_^ 'U.OK. i Of ^ ) / \?4.,*,*. .'J L 2, . PL CDws.Tcjjc.Trou x ^^ \V 't x. V/ /_, L =• 2o x- ' Z. ' -=• 2 =7 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT OoM-TfaflC PAGE JOB NO. COMPUTED BY_jL CHECKED BY jj?ol DATE DATE JL. A- V-k- He«JgQKjT«fll- p - = ! to*XI* (t V . „ J SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC 111-152 'oob^-rfl-rxeM PAGE PROJECT SUBJECT JOB NO COMPUTEDBY_y CHECKED BY Of DATE DATE - T)sf=Uc.TXCKl fl , 2. AA I-i ^&T 1" LL OK T.CH^cK r V - V, = ?>; OK SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT !?A)4CUo CAfg-V^lcL So O^>TAT^1O M SUBJECT PAGE JOB NO. COMPUTED BY \'7l_t&' PftTE / CHECKED BY DATE . -*-' M fey ex 41L tells R.e&L fen. - (S-. - Y^E " ^ "2- Hi Nil H 4 - G-/?pJT - *2-OO O pai MIM (MUM use 7.Or MOT ^ r J^OO f-i ^ \/$ A-l . t*\k»\ 7 SO ( = SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 I PROJECT _ C_SUBJECT _PJstTgP *- rlg"-JS>£ JOB NO. COMPUTED BY. / CHECKED BY °f DATE DATE _ S.^ />- !.*/(./• Ml.*f a - S.zl > i. 5-31 o (aAJLU WcUls Ar TTi& 2,) X H4U. 1Z." o.c - 4 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT kdKVCUft L-gMgy^fe.!- SUBJECT CoM-tffPL UP«J«,£. PAGE JOB NO COMPUTED BY CHECKEDBY_ ? of . DATE / DATE YT. &, ^. S P <* 4 &T P N\ C*. ^. - "2 X 1-5" -, / V. -vo*3. 3 ^ To ff M G* L f U6C w.6. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT KAKXCWO ^Atf.TsAfeL S Jta PAGE ol SUBJECT UoiJ*>C JOB NO. COMPUTED BY \ .W*tL DATE 7//C/S CHECKED BY DATE _JL_, /. V««=fe.-rrCA L LOADS a, 2.)UOC -<., W. U6C r O -4 O. (TPttLL) Cff.A. PL OKl-r; CIS. A. i I?,'? tO l.fs\p L 2 ^ «?. f I=-U2 C = 2 X^-- c SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE.oi JOB NO. COMPUTED BY ^ •*??,$. DATE_y CHECKED BY DATE . C- C _ F-L - a 002 *=. 0*11 9 M /O > OK SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE,of JOB NO. COMPUTED BY CHECKEDBY_ DATE DATE Y. C. WflLL I. Ko6 3. A. 4 p- *L i r, »> ** M ^•x2-f.i,) C IQ.Q.7J ^ -L -7- 3D •7.6*2* 7, 6flic., *" _ /^ j ^ L _ SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE. JOB NO COMPUTED BY CHECKED BY_ DATE DATE I.D. o toft? PL WAUL £&UJfM6M T ' ir fe'-o" K.OOH1 . & TASL£ T-1) j&l \lo-S K., SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT H0l>*>£ PAGE JOB NO. COMPUTED BY ^.-X^ <£ PATE ^//J^/J'? CHECKED BY DATE '«.**" = -f-3 e&}.tt^ i o. CH&CK \L\. UUli R V - /fc 6AC5 .-o.c -"t SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT ----- - <: SUBJECT PAGE 28 of JOB NO. COMPUTED BY \.ff,d. DATE //'C/7 CHECKED BY DATE I. D.4."o"4V /a? K___^L 4 S,f=- WALL OF L&&W L JL Lx LY £> c D B X X Y Y Y zo \O.<f>7 WUt 5.75" too ,32.10.0 |0.0 .t ^00 - WO ^ 22. 7Z x-- OF - !M /H C? y *-"/, SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT Jglfl MC.U o L^Sjg^ ^^.L s*SUBJECT (—,OM-r>e_o PAGE z JOB NO. ^CHECKED BY 0( COMPUTED BY V'^f - ^' DATE Y.D. 2.E> s.s 7.n o o 3 _ A: k 3.5* 7/7 - A /. »C k . 51 7. i 717 7-17 3.5 20 Z.'JIU 7iff \oo •{ v <g> 0 ® 50 loo SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE ~5O Of JOB NO. COMPUTED BY. CHECKED BY DATg DATE .(com.) .„ v7 »r UL &"? ^-V y= ./ S*.Acn"r.M6- AT F, =. (f2o t OT. p ) r V x^o = M 0 M C SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAfiF JOB NO COMPUTED BY CHECKEDBY_ DATE DATE I. P. 5.(TOUT..) MA'_>C H Q.L.) tO.O X 10.67 X. B ) 7£ X ^ y = y i- i 0 , o SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PAGE n, PROJECT SUBJECT JOB NO. COMPUTED BY ^.-/y. ^7. DATE CHECKED BY DATE . U^LL "C M - K z 3 50.0 311 3IZ 2,^0 7f 00 * / c*, /• o.n a / ; UlaLLV Z. 3 21.30 K M "D"4uUic V d V2,ZD il 5".CMercK •v- fv - l.o ( i ^ . S A^/fjy ~e* A: 0. : SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE 5>l nf JOB NO COMPUTED BY *\ .*?/• A. OATF CHECKED BY DATE . 4 WALL To CR "S. UJALL D O 0 to.in 41. O 0 t> 5". 32 t.Ob J//.7Z J5.1Z. i.: If. 14-. It. T".- H. A e c o AMO T^vJAL V= C°TibU J MX fc'73 Ooof . O 20,7+ .0% 4SO It,i , oo . 0 \ c SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT So PAGE 34-o. JOB NO. COMPUTED BY CHECKED BY. DATE DATE 3..H-5. . Z p .^&sJ U^ "0 4 "£*\ $7 fteTx tf" t^tOE. US Z^ rr f> ^ If^ •• . t ( V<5,o- Yo ) ' . C- ^. . -2_ > 1^ Mot &U, js t?Z SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT _ |X C~ Klj: U/> Cc^/- />ycx' ^suT'S---. _ JOB NO. ) I~k7~}*<i-s _ COMPUTED BY CfcJSUBJECT l^/S~,Tv-g ; / gr^a-^ COMPUTED BY, CHECKED BY DATE i PIER. 2. 3 s- hO B \ ..c) w#Lt- C P^; SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PAGE.01 SUBJECT JOB NO. COMPUTED BY CHECKEDBY_ DATE DATE 10=. lift"" IT- O = ±L_ J- H r -6 r /, '^: V1 LL ro o TO Loeto 3ZT. L.,5,4- z 42,5- SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 fa ^AKLMttl PAGE. PROJECT SUBJECT JOB NO. COMPUTED BY. CHECKED BY ol DATE DATE 5, MOT Ar All ALL 2+ J_ .I / x ^. .35.77 be. - 3-7^ LL. t fe ftt. t 'i fc-ff Kt " Sf ^ ^ o. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT l?AritUo SUBJECT PAGE.ol JOB NO. COMPUTED BY \.9l.Q. DATE CHECKED BY DATE-. Z. I ,. f.FACTO* >v * ^~C /. ir -t a- g AiUujflbU 4- k.. MAX. I, flex OPA r- U x teoo rV r "V s. £ : , K \/s jo . 00 ^r. CD THf SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT £flMc.Ho Crt.gNAE.l- PAGE.of SUBJECT C O N\ T g-O L hJ-QQ JOB NO. COMPUTED BY S-DATE CHECKEDBY.DATE I.. 3,L loAD, \o HoM^t AT 1C W T0 M =T LOAD fa Hij- Mci'f •e, Tngge T OH C 3L --r^- ~ 'z z LL/O. 11 c f r iT i 1. i / , i,P1 AC i p 3 x'°00 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT ncnje.-£. PAGE, JOB NO. COMPUTED BY__5 CHECKED BY DATE DATE OMC> V M - L O\\ ^ 0. 0 ' >, / ^ ' TM ^ Jl r lo,*gQ ^ r Z^P^toO O. :A SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE.ol JOB NO. COMPUTED BY J>-^7 ^. DATE CHECKED BY DATE , SL. T, LXkmL lOALLr 7^x5.5'= SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT Krtv4CHt> SUBJECT CoKlT"g.ol PAGE,of JOB NO. COMPUTED BY DATE CHECKED BY.DATE JU. L I. b."P* r e5T.Yf-,p CY.L. i) . ^ 1^-7.iptr xMEnLfc^T L C^A'?, •=. V - 3. 2,3 A = 300 ^..._t. •*—c » /4 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PAGE.of PROJECT SUBJECT JOB NO, COMPUTED BY ^ CHECKED BY DATE DATE uJelAf or' F ^x 1 0.47 ) / ^ = IV?, r'j A/Tc fieszsr 0 /^ fCMll SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT . SUBJECT .JooSE PAGE. JOS NO. COMPUTED BY V '??. 4. DATE CHECKED BY DATE L. 4.* ™- x -.. STtELOscK 7 SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE.of _ JOS NO. COMPUTED BY 1..tf-d. DATE 9//&/X' CHECKED BY DATE 3L L.Z-.T 1* "*'' lOalL 6A / rLGft^J- 't, f \ -oO ^ ^)e6MG.T-ff ^ JSCs'i x |.3S x 4^, ^ a. -f SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 £AC.Tvlgl__ SotoPROJECT SUBJECT C.L WOP PAGE,of JOB NO. COMPUTED BY_A.. / CHECKED BY DATE DATE 2L L. 5] 767 . = 3.15 kr. X IjfA. Lo^a p "(S' SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT C-Oh-lT(2jO PAGE Vf JOB NO. COMPUTED BY *y./7.^7. DATE CHECKED BY DATE 31. L.4.W., o 3(0,000 REC.ES & SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE. JOB NO. COMPUTED HY CHECKED BY ;,«#.£DATE DATE XI, H. A. 2o r */« oc- lO to 5 (?,*&& f>s.i t aeUQ 1=. T ^ (•?*#,*&o) K * ry^ SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT U PAGE. JOB NO. COMPUTED BY \ CHECKED BY. of DATE DATE *? 41, L, £ T- Trte THAT ~fi4e~To Tvw h TUt Tne r^re "TftAT o N 6- TH 0 UAP XK To W U4P= *to LOA.C? - t^cn*** r n,<r7 <•• V - 2.) < . //tf,°A A S Fu ^ 2- SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT ^AUlUo G^^f^i^L So C.SUBJECT .t-,f^ Tgp L PAGE „* JOB NO. D( .-, COMPUTED BY 5 ' ^' ^ • _ PATE ¥//(*/& 7 / CHECKED BY _ DATE _ V A • 2. 3. [3. A - OL, ^ , L.L. =: r- Lg>A P . _' £--rT ft- c. SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PAGE.52?of PROJECT SUBJECT JOB NO. COMPUTED BY ^ CHECKED BY DATE >//£/£'7 DATE 2.,'D.L.-t-LOAD D.u- _cm. &.!,«..> -B.^t,z;) /? = =1 2,/3/ ff \2, " 0«f^p MAX p^g ru> ±11 »z f - SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 o _ Qaiftf^E.1 --PROJECT _ SUBJECT ( ^. PAGE.of JOB NO. . COMPUTED BY \.^t^, DATE I //(*•/£, CHECKED BY DATE l.D, V- 1,7 LL H -3. / - .£Hs£jc * * geiHptfiec£rt£MT 2. -*5 SrtR. c?ucie opew jrtfi.5 , SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 Cky^H\S,L SPROJECT SUBJECT PAGE. JOB NO. CHECKED BY. ot COMPUTED BY L . /ff $f DATE DATE VL D. PUC.T Z- "A" 4- UW' 005. EHTiftt ^Dt-' ^ ^2 7! \^,\ VUC.-T OpeM tMG- » E*6" " ^ U -, AY /z *- " /V.?0^/^>/5"J 7 7 % - •. ^-^ p^| I. f "7 <£>„ . > j <• si c>0 > *r <£. /£1 [ <"eJ-A - ^' ' *V > 0.51 OK SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE.ol JOB NO. COMPUTED BY_?__p CHECKED BY DATE DATE \=>.3T. C, \\ , -' I ^* SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 PROJECT SUBJECT PAGE.of JOB NO. COMPUTED BY ] _^ CHECKED BY PATE DATE 5". 4 Z.Sut =-7 rp. 6, - Tee cast? SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC FORM 111-152 S If ft 2>Tfl f JO KlPROJECT SUBJECT Co bJT/LO L H ft tra»g PAGE 55" of 55" JOB NO. COMPUTED BY.//.£DATE CHECKED BY.DATE y-' /./•-*• 1-^/^ 5- «? 21. C5; OTT tf XV A To J tf* $#*** Zj &**. VIIL. A- "T&e To Hoo&-ti To L 2. Use THC - 5- t?t-rftxLs ?. O STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR CONCRETE MASONRY WALL PALOMAR SUBSTATION CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Prepared By: Kercheval Engineers August 28, 1991 KERCHEVAL ENGINEERS CIVIL/STKUCTURAL/ENGINEERING CONSTKUCnON MANAGEMENT i 4740 MURPHY CANYON RD., SUITE 310, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-4321 • (619) 571-0520 • FAX: (619) 576-7489 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS 1. Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure « 2,000#/Sq. Ft. Per Soils Report Dated: 06/07/91 Entitled "Proposed Palomar Substation San Diego Gas & Electric Co. Camino Vida Roble Carlsbad, California" 2. Minimum Embedment into Natural Soil - I Ft. 3. Lateral Force: Wind Pressure = 15 PSF Seismic, Fp = ZICpWp - 0.4 x 1.0 x 0.75Wp - 24 PSF-GOVERNS REFERENCES: 1. UBC, 1988 2. Masonry Design Manual UNIT WEIGHTS: 1. Concrete 150 PCF (Reinforced) 2. Masonry 80 PSF (Fully Grouted) 3. Soil 100 PCF i KERCHEVAL ENGINEERS \ CMl/STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING VA PLANNING AND SURVEYING 4740 MURPHY CANYON RD..SU1TE 310, SAN DIEGO. CA 92123-4321 SUBJECT ^ \o- JOB NO. BY_CHECKED SHEET OF ' 12 (?^ o.ffo £ ,f ".o1 ?-- KERCHEVAL ENGINEERS CML/STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLANNING AND SURVEYING 4740 MURPHY CANYON RD.^UfTE 310, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-4321 SUBJECT HATP . ' JOB NO Wit, - BY CHECKED PA KERCHEVAL ENGINEERS CIV1L7STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PLANNING AND SURVEYING 4740 MURPHY CANYON RD.,SUfTE 310, SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-4321 SUBJECT DATE__ .g-^-y/ JOB NO. BY_CHECKED SHEFT < 18 ft ........ KERCHEVAL ENGINEERS CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING - PLANNING AND SURVEYING 4740 MURPHY CANYON RD.^UfTE 310. SAN DIEGO, CA 92123-4321 SUBJECT DATE JOB NO.. BY f&iw , CHECKED. SHEET-OF WALL *; 7-9- 20,000 = fi *!**::.._.. - 2^.77 L :n /KXIV --- KERCHEVAL ENGINEERS '-<4J^A\ CIVIL/STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING , „, ,nn PLANNING AND SURVEYING MURPHY CANYON RD.^UfTE 310. SAN DIEGO. CA 92123-4021 SUBJECT PHIUP HENKINQ BENTON CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 10332 OEOTECHN1CAL ENGINEER NO. 136 BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS - FOUNDATIONS 5540 PUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA92123 ESTABLISHED 1956 June 7, 1991 TELEPHONE (619) 565-1955 FAX (619) 5654719 San Diego Gas and Electric P.O. Box 1831 San .Diego, CA 92112 Attention: Mr. Craig Riker Gentlemen: This is to transmit to you five copies of our report under Project No. 91-5-6A entitled "Soils Investigation, Proposed Palomar Airport Substation* San Diego Gas and Electric Company, Camino Vida Roble, Carlsbad, California," dated June 7, 1991. If you should have any questions regarding the data presented in this report, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. ^^r ^^^ ^T "^^f f ' ^^^^^****a»^^ * ^^ ^^ilip If. Benton, Civil Engineer PHB/jer SOILS INVESTIGATION PROPOSED PALOMAR AIRPORT SUBSTATION SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 91-5-6A JUNE 7, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS SOILS INVESTIGATION Page Introduction 1 Field Investigation 1 and 2 Laboratory Tests 2, 3, and 4 DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Soil Strata 5 Conclusions and Recommendations 5 and 6 Foundation Design 6 and 7 Resistance to Lateral Loads 7 Expansive Soils 7 Foundation Design - Cast-In-Place Concrete Piers 8 Retaining Walls 9 Pavement Section Recommendations 10 and 11 DRAWING TITLE Drawing Location of Test Borings and CBR Samples 1 Summary Sheets: Boring 1 2 and 3 Boring 2 4 Boring 3 5 and 6 Boring 4 • 7 and 8 Consolidation Curves 9 and 10 APPENDICES Unified Soil Classification Chart A Standard Specifications for Placement of Compacted Filled Ground AA Sampling, Shear Tests, Consolidation Tests and Expansion Tests B int en o os- BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS — FOUNDATIONS 5540 RUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA92123 ESTABLISHED 1956 PHIUPHENKINQ BENTON TMVF^TTrflTTON TELEPHONE<619>565.1955 CIVh-ENQINEERNO. 10332 MJlLj 1H VtO I ibft I lUM FAX(619)565-8719 QEOTECHNICAL ENQINEER NO. 138 Introduction This report presents the results of a soils investigation conducted at the site of the proposed San Diego Gas and Electric Company Substation to be located on Camino Vida Roble in Carlsbad, California. The location of the site is near Palomar Airport and is Lot 5 of Carlsbad Tract Ho. 81-46, Airport Business Center, Unit No. 1. The objectives of this investigation were to determine the general subsurface soil conditions and sufficient physical characteristics of the soils so that soil parameters and engineering recommendations could be presented for the design and construction of the planned foundations. Four exploratory borings were drilled and undisturbed soil samples were obtained at 2 to 5 feet intervals in order that laboratory tests could be presented to provide foundation recommendations. Loose bulk soil samples were also obtained in order to perform California Bearing Ratio tests.* Field Investigation Four borings, 30 inches in diameter, were drilled using a truck-mounted, rotary, bucket-type drill rig at the approximate locations shown on the attached Drawing 1 entitled "Location of Test Borings and CBR Samples." iA The depths of the borings ranged from 20 feet to 29 feet below the existing ground surface. A continuous log of the soils encountered in the borings o"^was recorded by our Registered Geologist at the time of drilling and is*->o • *For data for pavement design recommendations. -2- shown in detail on Drawings 2 through 8, each entitled "Summary Sheet.11 The soils were visually classified in accordance with the field identification procedures of the Unified Soil Classification Chart. A simplified description of this classification system is presented in Appendix A. Undisturbed soil samples were obtained at intervals of 2 to 5 feet, where possible, in the soils ahead of the drilling. The drop weight used for driving the sampling tube into the soils was the "Kelly" bar of the drill rig which weighed 2218 pounds and the average drop was 12 inches. The drive energies used in sampling are shown on the summary sheets and are given in foot-kips/foot. The general procedures used in field sampling are described under "Sampling" in Appendix B. Three loose bulk soil samples were obtained at the site in order to conduct California Bearing Ratio tests. The locations at which the soil samples were obtained are shown on Drawing 1. Laboratory Tests Laboratory tests were performed on all undisturbed samples of the soils in order to determine the dry density, moisture content, and shearing strength. The soil samples tested for shearing strength were saturated and drained prior to the shearing under normal load conditions. The test results are presented on Drawings 2 to 8. Consolidation tests were performed on representative samples in order to determine the load-settlement characteristics of the soils and the results of these tests are presented graphically on Drawings 9 and 10, each entitled "Consolidation Curves." The general procedures used for the laboratory tests are described in Appendix B. Expansion tests were conducted on soil samples obtained within the upper subgrade to determine their vertical expansion characteristics with -3- change in moisture content. The undisturbed samples were allowed to dry in the air at 100°C for two days, then saturated while confined under a unit load of 500 pounds per square foot. The recorded expansions are given below: Depth Boring Sample in Percent No. No. Feet Soil Description Expansion 1 1 2.0 Gray Brown Clayey 4.67 Silt with Lenses of Sandy Clay 2 1 2.0 Gray Brown Fine Sandy 6.00 Clay 3 3 7.0 Gray Brown Clayey Fine 3.87 Sand with 40 Percent Silty Clay 4 1 2.0 Gray Brown Clayey Fine 3.16 Sand with 30 Percent Silty Fine to Medium Sand The expansion test results indicate that the existing fill and natural soils within the upper subgrade possess medium to low expansion potential. Direct shear tests were performed on a representative undisturbed soil sample to determine the minimum angle of internal friction and apparent cohesion of the soils. All samples were saturated and drained prior to testing. The test results are as follows: -=c Boring 1 f Sample 1 ^ Depth: 2.0' Boring 4 = Sample 1 -M Depth: 2.0' O)"5* * Value reduced to compensate for direct shear test method. Normal Load Kips/sq.ft. 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 Maximum Shearing Resistance Kips/sq.ft. 1.20 2.75 1.50 2.20 Angle of Internal Friction Degrees 40* 24 Apparent Cohesion Lbs/sq.ft. 700 1280 -4- A compaction test was conducted on a representative soil sample taken within the fill soils at Boring 3. The test was performed in accordance with ASTM D 1557-78. The test results are given below: Boring Sample No. No. Bag 1 Bag 1 Depth of Sample I1- 2' Soil Description Maximum Dry Density Ib/cu ft Gray Brown Clayey Fine 111.8 Sand with 40% Silty Clay 1'- 2' Gray Brown Clayey Kine 108.7 Sand Optimum Moisture Content % dry wt 14.7 15.7 Percent Compac- tion 87.4 92.3 California Bearing Ratio tests were performed on representative samples of the upper subgrade soils in the proposed paved and compound areas. The CBR tests were conducted in accordance with City of San Diego methods. The results of these tests are tabulated below: CBR No. 1 2 Depth of Sample 0-1 0-1 Boring 3 0-1 -=c £> tnti— i01 oz -+->u o 0. The general Molded Initial Dry Moisture Density Content PCF % dry wt 107.6 19.9 113.6 18.7 116.6 15.1 procedures used for the Pene- tra- tion Inch 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Load in Pounds on 3 Sq.In. Plunger 176 283 355 402 442 99 164 218 270 307 68 118 162 196 225 laboratory tests CBR % of Std. 5.9 6.3 6.2 5.8 5.7 3.3 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.9 2.3 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.9 Percent Expansion During Soaking 5.5 9.9 13.6 Percent Moisture After Penetration 29.1 30.5 32.0 are described in Appendix B. -5- DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOWEN DAT IONS Soil Strata The log of Boring 1 indicates that natural, very firm, clayey silt was encountered beginning at the ground surface to a depth of 16.0 feet. Very firm silty claystone was found below 16.0 feet to a depth of 20.0 feet, the limit of exploration. Natural, very firm fine sandy clay was logged to a depth of 17.0 feet at Boring 2, and was underlain by very firm siltstone to 20.0 feet, the depth of investigation. Free ground water was encountered at a depth of 16.0 feet and is likely to be perched. The log of Boring 3 shows that medium compact clayey fine sand fill soils were found within the upper 0.6 foot of subgrade. Compact, clayey fine sand fill soils were logged between 0.6 foot and 9.0 feet. Natural, very firm, silty fine to medium sand was observed between 9.0 feet and 17.0 feet and was underlain by very firm fine sandy clay to 22.5 feet, very firm silty fine sand to 25.0 feet, and very firm silty claystone to 29.0 feet, the limit of exploration. Medium compact clayey fine sand fill soils were encountered within the upper 0.6 foot of subgrade at Boring 4. Compact, clayey fine sand fill soils were found between 0.6 foot and 4.3 feet. Natural, very firm silty fine to medium sand was found below 4.3 feet to a depth of 14.4 feet, and was underlain by very firm fine sandy clay to 22.0 feet and very firm silty .-«: claystone to 25.0 feet, the depth of drilling. The borings were drilled ^ on May 10, 1991. 0- Conclusions and Recommendations 2= _+•> The following conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions 03 o* that are based upon site materials observed in the above field investigation, Q_ -6- laboratory test results, and engineering analyses and calculations. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice. No warranty is expressed or implied. Foundation Design Fill soils were encountered to depths of 9.0 feet and 4.3 feet, respectively, at Borings 3 and 4. No fill soils were logged in Borings 1 and 2. Borings 3 and 4 are located approximately 30 feet north of the southerly top of slope. It is understood that this south slope is acting as a buttress fill. It is recommended that any substation foundations be set back a minimum of 30 feet from the top of slope and compound masonry walls be located no closer than 15 feet from the top of slope. The compacted filled ground soils were inspected and tested for proper compaction by Moore and Taber. Moore and Taber presented a February 25, 1987 report indicating that no special requirements, exclusive of expansive soils, are necessary in developing Lot 5. It is assumed that fill soils were placed and compacted uniformly to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557-78. Suitable bearing natural and fill soils were encountered beginning at the ground surface at each of the boring locations. Since the soils possess low to medium expansion potential, it is recommended that both continuous and square or round footings be founded a minimum of 2 feet below final ground surface. Continuous footings at least one foot wide and founded 2.0 feet into either the compacted filled ground soils or firm natural soils may be designed using an allowable soil bearing value of 2000 pounds per b-i ^ square foot. Square or round footings which have a minimum width of 2 feet -t| and founded 2 feet below the final grade may be designed using an allowable soil bearing value of 2500 pounds per square foot. These bearing values for dead plus live loads and may be increased one-third for combined i Ol•r-5 -7- dead, live, wind, and seismic loads. The estimated settlement of a one foot wide continuous footing supporting a uniform load of 2000 pounds per lineal foot is less than 1/4 inch. A 5 feet square footing supporting a load of 62.5 kips may be subject to an estimated settlement of 3/8 to 1/2 inch. Resistance to Lateral Loads An allowable passive pressure of 250 pounds per square foot may be used at a depth of one foot into the compacted filled ground soils or firm natural soils for resistance to lateral loads. An allowable passive pressure increase of 150 pounds per square foot may be used for each additional foot of depth to a maximum of 3000 pounds per square foot. A coefficient of 0.3 is recommended for the frictional resistance between either the compacted filled ground soils or natural soils and the bottom of the footings. If the passive resistance and frictional resistance are combined to produce total lateral resistance, it is recommended that the coefficient of friction be reduced to 0.2. The above values are for combined dead, live, wind, and seismic loads. Expansive Soils Given the expansive soil conditions of the site, it is recommended that continuous footings be reinforced with a minimum of one #5 bar top and bottom located 3 inches from the bottom and IJg inches from the top of the footings. It is understood that it is planned to cap the subgrade within ^c the compound with a 1.0 foot thickness of select decomposed granite. Ifot" this is done, and at least one foot of select, nonexpansive compacted fill r—I O1 is placed beneath the concrete slabs-on-grade, then no other special design iso2:^ indicated. It is recommended that the normal steel reinforcement be usedj<u 'o that will prevent differential movement due to underlying moderately expansive Q_ clays below one foot. (4 to 6 percent expansion) -8- Foundation Design - Cast-In-Place Concrete Piers Drilled, cast-in-place concrete piers may be supported either by end- bearing or friction. If friction piers are used instead of end-bearing piers, no downhole inspection or cleanout will be necessary. Design shear capacities for friction piers have been calculated for 2 feet diameter piers using the saturated and drained shearing resistances from the laboratory tests. The capacities are tabulated below. The table provides total load values for specific depths of piers below the firm natural soils and compacted filled ground soils. Zone of Support * Within Firm Natural Soils Allowable Load for Zone Total Allowable Load 1. 3. 4. 6. 7. 9. 10. 12. 13. 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 - 1. '- 3. '- 4. '- 6. '- 7. '- 9. '-10. '-12. '-13. '-15. 5' 0' 5l 0' 5' 0' 5' O1 5' 0' 0 2 5 5 8 8 8 9 9 11 .6 .8 .8 .8 .8 .8 .4 .4 . .3 0 2. 8. 14. 22. 31. 39. 49. 58. 69. 6 4 2 2 0 8 2 6 9 * Embedment into natural soils. Zone of Support Within Compacted Filled Ground Soils** Allowable Load for Zone Total Allowable Load 0 - 1.5' 0 0 1.5'- 3.0' 4.2 4.2 3.0'- 4.5' 5.3 9.5 4.5'- 6.0' 5.3 14.3 6.0'- 7.5' 6.1 20.4 7.5'- 9.0 6.1 26.5 9.0'-10.5' 6.1 32.6 - 10.5'-12.0' 8.4 41.0 j> 12.0'-13.5' 8.4 49.4 ^ 13.5'-15.0' 9.6 59.0•—io>** Embedment into compacted filled ground soils. LO i—Icn oz tu '"-9oS- CL. -9- Retalm'ng Walls Cantilever retaining walls backfilled with the on-site clayey sand or'sandy clay soils that are placed and compacted to 90 percent of maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM D 1557-78 and with the methods described in the "Standard Specifications for Placement of Compacted Filled Ground" which is found in Appendix AA of this report, may be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 50 pounds per cubic foot for a level backfill condition. If the cantilever walls are backfilled with a 3 feet width of pea gravel for the entire height of the wall, an equivalent fluid pressure of 30 pounds per cubic foot may be used for the level backfill condition. Weep holes at intervals of 5 feet and backfilled with pea gravel may be used to ensure that hydrostatic pressures do not develop for the exterior cantilever type retaining walls. The backfill behind the retaining walls may be used for slab support only. Structural loads must be carried through fill soils to footings that are deepened a minimum of 1.0 foot into either the uniformly compacted filled ground or very firm natural bearing soils, and located so that the horizontal distance from the bottom of any part of any footing is at least 1.5 times the vertical difference in height from the bottom of that footing to the bottom of any other footings. The above pressures for design of retaining walls must be increased if surcharge loads are caused by placement of stockpiled materials, equipment, or building loads near the top of the retaining wall that are located a horizontal distance from the top of the wall that is less than 1.5 times the height of the wall, or if the soil becomes saturated. .o in -10- Pavement Section Recommendations The recommended asphaltic concrete pavement and base sections for the proposed access road and substation compound are based on the assumption that heavy truck loads are anticipated. A design wheel load of 12,000 pounds will be used for heavy truck wheel loads. California Bearing Ratio tests were conducted on three representative subgrade soil samples. The CBR values ranged from 2.3 to 5.9. The values are considered very low and this is due to the clayey soil types encountered within the upper subgrade throughout the site. A pavement section presented below is for a CBR of 5.0. Also, an alternative pavement section is presented assuming a select silty sand or decomposed granite product will be imported to the site and placed and compacted within the upper subgrade. The minimum CBR value for this is assumed to be 20.0. CBR 5.0 (On-Site Soils) Design Wheel Load - Pounds 12>000 a) Asphaltic Concrete 3^" b) Base Course Materials 13V (Caltrans Class II aggregate base gradation with a minimum CBR of 80 at 95 percent of maximum dry density) c) On-Site clayey sand and sandy clay 12" soils having a minimum CBR of 5.0 excavated and recompacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density. 03 •*"> Os-Q_ -11- CBR 20.0 (Imported Select Soils) Design Wheel Load - Pounds 12,000 a) Asphaltic Concrete 3%" b) Base Course Materials 4!$" (Caltrans Class II aggregate base gradation with a minimum CBR of 80 at 95 percent of maximum dry density) c) Imported silty sand soils 12" having a minimum CBR of 20.0 excavated and recompacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density. During construction, the proposed paving areas should be uniformly excavated to a depth equal to the combined total thicknesses of Lines (a), (b), and (c) shown above. The exposed surface should then be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moistened or dried as necessary to an optimum moisture content and uniformly compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by the ASTM D 1557-78 method. All compaction shall be done under continuous engineering inspection, with reliable field density tests taken at intervals not to exceed one foot vertically and 100 feet horizontally. All field density tests shall verify that the soil is compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum dry density. The maximum vertical thickness of lifts shall be 6 inches after compaction. Next, the select on-site soils shall be placed as described above and each layer shall be uniformly compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density up to the base course level. The base course shall then be imported and compacted at optimum moisture content to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density, prior to the placement and compaction of the asphaltic concrete. -12- Respectfully submitted, BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. yOofffi'R.BentorN-' Reviewed by Philip H. BAfiton; Civil Engineer--— RCE No. 10332 and Geotechnical Engineer No. 138 Distribution: (5) San Diego Gas and Electric Company Attention: Mr. Craig Riker JHB/PHB/jer 01 o Os_ Q. LEGEND VINDICATES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST BORING A INDICATES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF CBR SAMPLE DATE: 5-15-1991 DRAWN; M.JACKSON SCALE: r - so- LOCATION OF TEST BORINGS AND CBR SAMPLES SDGCE ALOMAR AIRPORT SUBSTATION CAMINO VIDA ROBLE CARLSBAD,CALIFORNIA MIOJICT NO. 91-5-6A BENTON ENGINEERING,INC. DRAWING NO. 1 uZ aO H Ul EPTH/FEa 1- 2- 3- 4-_ 5-^ fi~~ — 7- ^ 8-_ Q—_ 10- 11- — 12-— 13- "^ 14- 15-SAMPLENUMBER© © © (NR) zo 1 —SOILbSSlFICAlSYMBOL5o / At 't ' 1 f. / ' f \ ' t ' i t / /f ' i f , f / / ft / t / ' t f t / / ' t / / / '/ / / V ftf / / f> t / / // 1f , / / '/' it , / ' t / /'/f/ / /'/ /,/ / '/ ' t f ./ / '//• /V', ' / '/ / // '/f tf > / 1/ /'> '* / /// ' 1 ', ' t / f. f'/ tf/ /1 ' i tf ', j ' tt //, 'y /. / / / ^ '/ '/ ^ // '/ / ft f t f 1 / ft >, f / ^ '> /' y/ V 'y '^/ / / ' 1 ^, t / / / ',/, / 'y '- / ' (/, / / i 'f. SUMMARY SHEET BORING NO. 1 Gray Brown, Hoist, Very Firm, Interbedded with Silt, Silty Clay and Occasional Lenses of Fine Sandy Clay Irregular Lime-Cemented CLAYEY SILT > §H Ul 0- u.5 S "• 6.7 6.7 4.4 8.9 39.9 u*t s§ 21. 20. 23. 24. — Continued On Drawing 3 C^y Indicates Undisturbed Drive Sample (NR) Indicates Sample Not Recovered [ 1 Indicates Loose Bulk Sample PROJECT NO. n1 c _. BENTON ENGINEERING. INC.yj-a-oA 4 7 8 4 £*-£ u.n U1D00 >-s*r Bgj 106.1 106.5 100.8 100.7 — — in*-'Ou.SHEARESISTANIPS/SQ. ICK 0.57 1.24 1.88 2.22 — — DRAWING NO. 2 IUuu.•*.z H0. UJ UICC.JUJ CLffl ocoz SUMMARY SHEET BORING NO. 1 (Continued) I"-CCu. u —z»IU 0. fet03 QO UJf.' 16 17- 18- 19- 20- Jrregular Lime-Cemented Lenses Dark Gray, Moist, Very Firm, Interbedded with Merging Lenses of Silty Fine to Medium Sand CLAYEY SILT SILTY CLAYSTONE 17.7 17.9 115.1 0.98 Stop at 20' •MIfl.C i7 i. A3o. t/l UJ2 Do PROJECT NO. 91-5-6A BENTON ENGINEERING, INC.DRAWING NO. 3 tu COo f_DEPTH/FEE1- 2" 3- — 4- 5- 6- *™ 7- 8- 9- 10- ^^ 11- 12- 14" ^m 15- - 16- J./ 18- 19-SAMPLENUMBER© (?) ^ (A) ff\ (*> zo SOILLAS 3 IF ICATISYMBOLU j&Jr*j4 *J*M lyS «^*jtf»%jfjf &.& $ 55" *j^j 50jfy *3F4w^Jffj Bv** x/ fir $ &m yi iXSsrfj ytr Sr JT. fir "jr.y Vw*A \ i 9m\ rfi ^ 9*&&rfmA % && % Water % 5 3 S S£\J & * • S SUMMARY SHEET BORING NO. 2 Gray Brown, Moist, Very Finn, Interbedded with Silty Clay and Occasional Merging Lenses of Silty Fine to Medium Sand t Free Water Saturated Perched) Dark Gray, Moist, Very Firm Interbedded with Merging Lenses of Silty Claystone and Few Shells FINE SANDY CLAY SILTSTONE > OH u tz«III 0. s5 8.9 6.7 11.1 11.1 11.1 13.3 FIELDMOISTURE% DRY WT19.5 21.5 22.2 24.1 16.4 22.7 ?* i-DRY DENSI1LBS/CU. FL04.8 104.3 L04.6 103.7 115.9 L12.8 WiJ SHEARRESISTANCKIPS/SQ. F1.56 0.76 3.11 2.01 2.67 3.96 Stop at 20' PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO.DENTON ENGINEERING, INC. , 91-5-6A * UI mo 1- Ul Ulu. X Ul 2- 3- 4- — 5- 6- — 7- 8- 9- 1 f\10- 11- 12- — 13- 14- 15- 16- 17~ 18- 19- 20- UICC«iuj CLGQ Ocoz © © (3) © © ® zo • _,50*™ ^J fM °t 205 >•coo 5 O W0Vfm vSv/X ^7/AjW*^^V fyytff/' $f$ fajr$ *//}** j i$!w. *t^Af m£* r^yfc^^i^t?[xVj'cft >5i^/h Wi* 1 'Wifrt rcjjffi/ W |P ^ JlM^pT liliiffjg/S 1 SUMMARY SHEET BORING NO. 3 Gray Brown, Hoist, Medium {Compact Compact, Hixed with 40% Silty Clay . Contact Slopes 10° to / S50°H r Light Gray and Olive, Hoist, Very Firm, With Clay Interbeds Continuous .__ — ^>-> Irregular Fracture in Clay Brown, Erosional Contact | Approx. Level Gray Brown, Hoist, Very Firm, Interbedded with Silty Clay . Bedding Dips 5° to S30°U CLAYEY FINE SAND SILTY FINE TO HEDIUH SAND 1 FINE SANDY CLAY SHff li_ z m W ft™ ui ^ 4.4 4.4 4.4 6.7 20.0 8.9 OB ^*C3 "^ ^^ ••f CO y *** Q Q 25.1 25.2 24.4 12.3 11.4 18.8 Continued On Drawing 6 PROJECT NO. gi_5_6A BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. >^t u.(0z •Ul 300 ^ cS 97.7 99.5 95.7 114.7 120.7 109.0 £>-'f\ nccz 111 * CJ IW w (0 M o5iui 1.27 1.48 1.28 2.78 2.17 2.54 DRAWING NO. 5 , Fill o•^ i- ^— u 'u-p UJ •0 VIra o ipm O in _ u z CD O *» <D p* H EPTH/FEEO 21- 22- 23" 24- 26- — 27- 28-SAMPLENUMBER(!) (s) zo SOIL•SSIFICATISYMBOL^ u fe^ ^Wt tf 5WJ ?ix<Sx> ^56'J'lit*P SUMMARY SHEET BORING NO. 3 (Continued) . Bedding Dips 5° to S30°U Light Gray, Hoist, Very Firm Dark Gray, Hoist, Very Finn, with Lime-Cemented Lenses FINE SANDY CLAY SILTY FINE SAND SILTY CLAYSTONE > O H- III CL S^st 20.0 34.0 IIIH* CC ^to ^V •% ^^ *^oS 12. 16. Stop at 29 ' PROJECT NO. 01 c .. BENTON ENGINEERING, INC.91-5-6A 4 8 t H *Y DENSI1B8/CU. F0J 116.5 116.2 UJ bJ SHEARESISTANCIPS/ SO. F*x 3.18 3.18 DRAWING NO. 6 Ul2 A O HUl111U. X 0. UJp "~ Q— • 3- 4- — 5- _6: "7 ™- 8- — 9- 10- 11- 12- 13- - 14- 15- 16- — 17- 18- 19- 20-1 UJBC-JUJa. co22 coz i © © © © (D zoJ" JO°0^2 0«w 5u £/$«/ Jr^ii^y ^ toffft 9 <£ fr^^^f vji^if f *fj¥f9% •i**L IT*f^y/fy ivftiS'i l.i .£ h Kf*I \J7nv « i?14Jl ^ic ff 1M ^ «+}/' I ; !ltlfw III $$fy j/i*ilt Ej&ijj ^^^v5> ^W ^W<^S SUMMARY SHEET BORING NO. 4 Gray Brown, Moist, Medium (Conpact Conpact, Mixed with 30% Silty Fine to Medium Sand Contact Little Irregular /Slopes Approx. 4° to South Light Gray, Moist, Very Firm with Occasional Thin Lenses of Fine Sandy Clay and Clay . Bedding Dips 5° to S10°H Occasional Thin Lenses of Fine Sandy Clay Gray Brown, Moist, Very Firm Interbedded with Silty Clay - CLAYEY FINE SAND SILTY FINE TO MEDIUM SAND FINE SANDY CLAY >_ O HtC '* z oWa_"2V Ul* § *"• 4.4 4.4 8.9 11.1 6.7 13.3 S|I 21 20 10 15 19 18 Continued On Drawing 8 PROJECT NO. ni c ,. BENTON ENGINEERING, INC.yl-D-6A .6 .6 .5 .8 .1 .0 ^ K£ u.CO Ul ^) QO >-s OJ 100.3 104.2 116.2 114.1 108. 3 111.8 UJh.* On.KZ * III t ^J X0CQ °*w wUj Q.c£ 0.91 1.14 1.87 3.21 2.18 3.49 DRAWING NO. 7 Fill ' • KUJUlU.••»x H flL Ul O *fr 8UMMARY BORING NO. SHEET 4 (Continued)u* gooo 21- 22- 23- 24H Gray Brown, Moist, Very Finn Interbedded with Silty Clay Dark Gray, Hoist, Very Firm, with Few Lime-Cemented Lenses SANDY CLAY SILTY CLAYSTONE 20.4 15.7118.0 2.10 Stop at 25 ' i/> i. IDa. o c (/I Ul2 PROJECT NO. 91-5-6A BENTON ENGINEERING. INC.DRAWINQ NO. 8 r*» (rsx /err*CURVES ,_OAD ifj KIPS PER SG'JAR£ FOOT 0.6 0.6 1 2 c Boring: 1 Saraplo: 1 Depth: 21 Jonng Sample Depth: •33 O O INDICATES PERCENT CONSOLIDATE -VT FleL ^ INDICATES PERCENT CONSOL SOATI^N AFTER FATljRATfON *OJ.iCT NO. 91-5-6A BENTON . ENGINEERING INC. DRAWING NO. 9 CONSOLIDATION CURVES LOAD IN KIPS PER SQUARE FOOT 0.6 0.8 I 2 UJ O a: UJa. zo o _jo 9 £ 1 Boring Sample Depth: Boring Sample Depth: O 'ND1CATES PERCENT CONSOLIDATION AT FIELD MOISTURE /* i^OICATES f;;'r.KC£^T CONSOLIDATION AFTER SATURATION PROJECT NO. 91-5-W BENTON ENGINEERING INC.DRAWING NO. 10 APPENDIX A a.2 1s U ao u3"3 S5I r3lQ I Iv &ation Required torliuctlbini SoUOrotmboUa8 ii il • a • S«l ill Above "A" linewlih fl between4 and 7 arcbotdttttnt cue*rcqiKiinf use ofdual tymbolibowAtictbcrt tuuju a"A" lint, "rila fllicattr thui 1I xs20. S QIQ «• 33-Attetbcrt limit* below-A" line or PI leu loanAllntwit limii* below"A" lint >ilb ft•reatcr than ^tlOQUi^i imp jo M luuinbaj ona *VI/»*FJ*»p <" X ( :»»OIK)J tt p»tlincoaj| t|io* pauiul »u«o3 ( Jin »"'« 001 ••v umi Miiatut UOIIMI}) uuu jo 9tmuxu»d uo luipuM»Qanna Mrt HIUI HIOJJ pun pui (**•*! jo oiciuuiad auiuiuiaQ B0|i«3ttiiu»p1 p|>u upun ua*it IB jutmauj aijt luujnuap) ui atins »ii uiut Mfi i£ s5lii t aJ.i.a Well traded Bravel*. frmvcl-tand muiiurts, llnta or BOnnc*and tubtunUalcdiaie panktela Bnlol all•mouaucaraded Braveb. ftavcl*Kturet, IllUeor nofioettea* « Will)Braveli. poorly •ivcl- land-all I mixture*Nonplauic one* (lor tdentlocaiioB pro-ccditica M* Alt below)ey traveli.avcJ<*and-claIBMnj JownouJB l B>»dcd »andi, ftravclndi, little or no fine*btuuiiialparticleWide raBBt ta trai•mount* ot All•IK*ante ol liuauc* mimuedominantly one nu owith taint intermedia(•an! OU M 911110 lands, poorly traded tand-llt mixture*ic bno (for identificatrc*. ice ML below)poorluraClayey Mndt.unit-clay mlutic fine* Uor*ee CL belowItMnj joinaoiui Cam »*»ti t'«tt BOM aq iiui ai|i -u| f *4> 'uout>ytutp | nil M»II * -»n MBgt J3IJB) ft UOtllBl) •Jtoa jo j|m uitii a«on » -on h| UOtlMJJ §•.1.1»-**7 S35 9a saa ll* 0 3 U io» toiravdlyty clayt,1 not •• me clay* olmt ilium pUiticll) .clayi. tandy clayt,lean claytOrgaCla;Z J «E Of u* niuii pint)) **B|> pui .11(1 anic till*, micaceout oiornaceuut lint undy ov (oils, claiiic i HitIB iii * " " I - C- •»•- t _. 1. wOr|anicplait ki2iis ="li^a Si- 3«a u «So 9if*i**" **« = •= k»3« .?C .UBUI J>iUJl t«wi| pmbu •*«!> out I||«S laqunoq* i| sijt;'ON »4J> n«Ii* M IIIJ dentfecjtyrtpneit= uS.t.- -t 5 l9^£fl '2| !|ijiff1i JJiijli E ««. "SoS UliKI f^^fi ei?"HK!iM•Ssi"zSnMj!•iSU^il.i;-5ig».SSa£ BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS — FOUNDATIONS 5540 PUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA92123 ESTABLISHED 1956 APPENDIX AA PHILIPHENKINGBENTON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLACEMENT TELEPHONE(619)665-1955CIVIL ENGINEER NO 10332 ^IHHUHKU OrtUl T 1LH I 1UH3 FUK rLHUHPItn I FAX (6191565^719 GEOTECHNICALENG.NEERNO.,38 OF COMPACTED FILLED GROUND FAX (619) 565*719 1. General Description - The objective is to assure uniformity and adequate Internal strength In filled ground by proven engineering procedures and tests so that the proposed structures may be safely supported. The procedures include the clearing and grubbing, removal of existing structures, preparation of land to be filled, filling of the land, the spreading, and compaction of the filled areas to conform with the lines, grades, and slopes as shown on the accepted plans. The recommendations contained in the preliminary Soils Investigation report for this site and/or in the attached special provisions are a part of these specifications and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of a conflict. The owner shall employ a qualified soils engineer to inspect and test the filled ground as placed to verify the uniformity of compaction of filled ground to the specified 90 percent of maximum dry density. The grading contractor shall have the responsibility of notifying the soils engineer 48 hours or more in advance of the start of any clearing or site preparation so that the soils engineer and/or his field representative will be able to schedule the manpower for the required inspections. The soils engineer shall advise the owner and grading contractor immediately if any unsatisfactory conditions are observed to exist and shall have the authority to reject the compacted filled ground until such time that corrective measures are taken necessary to comply with the specifications. It shall be the sole responsibility of the grading contractor to achieve the specified degree of compaction. No deviation from these specifications will be allowed, except if amended by written instructions signed by the responsible soils engineer. 2. Clearing, Grubbing, and Preparing Areas to be Filled (a) All brush, vegetation and any rubbish shall be removed, piled and disposed of either off site in a legal disposal pit or in a specified permanent approved landscape area so as to leave the areas to be filled for approved structural support free of vegetation and debris. Any soft, swampy or otherwise unsuitable areas shall be corrected by draining or removal, or both. (b) All loose fill, topsoil, alluvial deposits or other unsatisfactory soil shall be removed to the limits determined by the soils engineer. Subdrainage systems shall be installed in the bottom of all canyon areas and in areas whenever ground water conditions are likely to develop beneath the compacted fill soils. (8/27/87) APPENDIX AA -2- (c) The natural ground which is determined to be satisfactory for the support of the filled ground shall then be plowed or scarified to a depth of at least six inches (6U), and until the surface is free from ruts, hummocks, or other uneven features which would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. (d) Where fills are made on hillsides or exposed slope areas, greater than 10 percent, horizontal benches shall be cut into firm undisturbed natural ground in order to provide both lateral and vertical stability. This is to provide a horizontal base so that each layer is placed and compacted on a horizontal plane. The initial bench at the toe of the fill shall be at least 10 feet in width on firm undisturbed natural ground at the elevation of the design toe stake placed at the natural angle of repose or design slope. Offset stakes shall be provided to leave in as reference stakes for the construction of the filled ground slopes. The soils engineer shall determine the width and frequency of all succeeding benches which will vary with the soil conditions and the steepness of slope. (e) After the natural ground has been prepared, it shall then be brought to a moisture content at a few percent above optimum moisture and compacted to not less than ninety (90%) percent of maximum density in accordance with ASTW D 1557-78 method that uses 25 blows of a 10 pound rammer falling from 18 inches on each of 5 layers in a 4-inch diameter cylindrical mold of a l/30th cubic foot volume. 3. Fill Materials and Special Requirements - The fill soils shall consist of select materials so graded that at least 40 percent of the material passes a No. 4 sieve. This may be obtained from the excavation of banks, borrow pits or any other approved sources and by mixing soils from one or more sources. The material used shall be free from vegetable matter, and other deleterious substances, and shall not contain rocks, or lumps, or cobbles of greater than 8 inches in diameter. If excessive vegetation, larger diameter cobbles, rocks and boulders, or soils with inadequate strength or other unacceptable physical characteristics are encountered, these shall be disposed of in waste areas as shown on the plans or as directed by the soils engineer. If, during grading operations, soils not encountered and tested in the preliminary investigation are found, tests on these soils shall be performed to determine their physical characteristics. Any special treatment recommended in the preliminary or subsequent soil reports not covered herein shall become an addendum to these specifications. The testing and specifications for the compaction of subgrade, subbase, and base materials for roads, streets, highways, or other public property or rights-of-way shall be in accordance with those of the governmental agency having jurisdiction. (8/27/87)' BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPENDIX AA -3- 4. Placing, Spreading, and Compacting Fill Materials (a) For mass grading, suitable fill material shall be placed in loose layers, moistened to 2 to 4 percent above optimum moisture content, and which, when compacted, shall not exceed six inches (6"). Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thorougly mixed during the spreading to ensure uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. (b) For compacted filled ground placed and compacted for subgrade support, for base and pavement under roadways and parking areas, the 6-inch thick layers of compacted filled ground to be placed and compacted within the upper 2 feet of finished grade shall be moistened to optimum moisture content, based on the ASTH D 1557-78 method and each layer shall be compacted to at least either 90 or 95 percent of maximum dry density as specified in the accompanying soils investigation report or specific project specifications, or as specified by the governmental agency. (c) When the moisture content of the fill material is below that specified by the soils engineer, water shall be added until the moisture content is at the moisture as specified by the soils engineer to assure thorough bonding and uniform densification during the compacting process. (d) When the moisture content of the fill material is above that specified by the soils engineer, the fill material shall be aerated by bidding and scarifying or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is at the moisture as specified by the soils engineer. (e) After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to not less than ninety (90%) percent of maximum density in accordance with ASTM D 1557-78 method as described in 2(e) above. Compaction shall be accomplished with sheepsfoot rollers, multiple-wheel pneumatic-tired rollers, or other approved types of compaction equipment, such as vibratory equipment that is specially designed for certain soil types. Rollers shall be of such design that they will be able to compact the fill material to the specified density. Rolling shall be accomplished while the fill material Is at the specified moisture content. Rolling of each layer shall be continuous over its entire area and the roller shall make sufficient trips to ensure that the desired density has been attained. The entire areas to be filled shall be compacted. (f) Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. The sloping surface shall be cat-tracked daily while the fill soils are still at field moisture conditions, 2 to 4 percent above optimum. Compacting operations shall be continued until materials within the outer 1.5 feet are uniformly compacted to 85 percent of maximum dry density or greater, unless (8/27/87) BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. APPENDIX AA -4- a different relative degree of compaction is specified by the local governing agency. Compacting of the slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling the slopes in increments of 3 to 5 feet in elevation gain or by other methods producing satis- factory results. (g) Field density tests shall be taken by the soils engineer for approximately each foot in elevation gain after compaction, but not to exceed two feet in vertical height between tests. Field density tests may be taken at intervals of 6 inches in elevation gain if required by the soils engineer. The location of the tests in plan shall be so spaced to give the best possible coverage and shall be taken no farther apart than 100 feet. Tests shall be taken on corner and terrace lots for each two feet in elevation gain. The soils engineer will take additional tests as considered necessary to check on the uniformity of compaction of the exposed slope areas as well as in the building prism areas. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the tests shall be taken in the compacted material below the disturbed surface. No additional layers of fill shall be spread until the field density tests indicate that the specified density has been attained. (h) The fill operation shall be continued in six inch (6") compacted layers as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes and grades as shown on the accepted plans. 5. Inspection - Sufficient inspection by the soils engineer shall be maintained during the filling and compacting operations so that the specified inspection and field density tests can be reported to the governmental agencies upon the completion of grading. 6. Seasonal Limits - No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled if weather conditions increase the moisture content above permissible limits. When the work is interrupted by rain, fill operations shall not be resumed until field tests by the soils engineer indicate that the moisture content and density of the fill are as previously specified. 7. All recommendations presented in the "Conclusions" section of the attached (preliminary) soils report are a part of these specifications. \0/C.//Oi ) BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS - FOUNDATIONS 5540 HUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123 ESTABLISHED 1956 PHIUPHENK.NG BENTON APPENDIX B C.VILENGINEERNO. 10332 FAX (619) 565*719 QEOTECHN1CAL ENGINEER NO. 138 Sampling The undisturbed soil samples are obtained by forcing a special sampling tube into the undisturbed soils at the bottom of the boring at frequent intervals below the ground surface. The sampling tube consists of a steel barrel 3.0 inches outside diameter, with a special cutting tip on one end and a double-ball valve on the other and with a lining of twelve thin brass rings, each one inch long by 2.42 inches inside diameter. The sampler, connected to a twelve inch long waste barrel, is either pushed or driven approximately 18 inches into the soil and a six-inch section of the center portion of the sample is taken for laboratory tests, the soil being still confined in the brass rings, after extraction from the sampler tube. The samples are taken to the laboratory in close-fitting waterproof containers in order to retain the field moisture until completion of the tests. The driving energy is calculated as the average energy in foot-kips required to force the sampling tube through one foot of soil at the depth at which the sample is obtained. Shear Tests The shear tests are run using a direct shear machine of the strain control type in which the rate of deformation is approximately 0.05 inch per minute. The machine is so designed that the tests are made without removing the samples from the brass liner rings in which they are secured. Each sample is sheared under a normal load equivalent to the weight of the soil above the point of sampling. In some instances, samples are sheared under various normal loads in order to obtain the internal angle of friction and cohesion. Where considered necessary, samples are saturated and drained before shearing in order to simulate extreme field moisture conditions. Consolidation Tests The apparatus used for the consolidation tests is designed to receive one of the one-inch high rings of soil as it comes from the field. Loads are applied in several increments to the upper surface of the test specimen and the resulting deformations are recorded at selected time intervals for each increment. Generally, each increment of load is maintained on the sample until the rate of deformation is equal to or less than 1/10000 Inch per hour. Porous stones are placed in contact with the top and bottom of each specimen to permit the ready addition or release of water. Expansion Tests One-inch high samples confined in the brass rings are permitted to air dry at 105° F for at least 48 hours prior to placing into the expansion apparatus. A unit load of 500 pounds per square foot is then applied to the upper porous stone in contact with the top of each sample. Water is permitted to contact both the top and bottom of each sample through porous stones. Continuous observations are made until downward movement stops. The:dial reading is recorded and expansion is recorded until the rate of upward movement is less than 1/10000 inch per hour. BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS — FOUNDATIONS 554Q RUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123 ESTABLISHED 1956 February 3, 1992 PHILIP HENKING BENTON CIVILENG1NEER NO. 10332 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER NO. 138 TELEPHONE (619) 565-1955 FAX (619) 565-8719 San Diego Gas and Electric Company P.O. Box.1831 San Diego, CA 92112 Attention: Subject: Mr. Rick Paras Project No. 91-5-6A Soils Investigation Report San Diego Gas and Electric Company Proposed Palomar Airport Substation Camino Vida Roble Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: Per your request, we are providing a_clarification_to the Benton Engineering, Inc. report dated June 7, 1991 for the above-referenced project. It is understood that a question has arisen concerning the "Expansive Soils" section of the report. It is recommended that the compound be capped with a minimum 1.0 foot thickness of select, decomposed granite. If this one foot of thickness decomposed granite is provided beneath the concrete slcLhszon^grade, then no other special design is indicated for these slabs. Please contact us if you have any questions. Thank you for your continued interest in our consulting engineering services. Respectfully submitted, BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. Benton, Civil Engineer" RCE No. 40519 Distribution: (2) Addressee PFB/jer r