Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
237 DATE AVE; ; CB032095; Permit
10-16-2003 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: Applicant: JAMES E VINE City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB032095 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 237 DATE AV CBAD RESDNTL $370,079.00 1 Sub Type: SFDR Lot #: 0 Construction Type: NEW Reference #: Structure Type: SFD Bathrooms: 4.5 VINE RES DEMO 900 SF SFD NEW 3989SF LIV 896SF GAR 433SF DECKS Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check#: ISSUED 07/30/2003 SB 10/16/2003 10/16/2003 241 DATE AVE 92008 729-5010 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee 1,381.24 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $897.81 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWAFee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $37.01 PFF $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 License Tax $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $0.00 Housing In Lieu Fee Housing Credit Fee $0.00 Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $181.00 $60.00 $63.00 $0.00 $4,515.00 $0.00 $1,163.34 $2,098.00 $0.00 $10,396.40 Total Fees: $10,396.40 Total Payments To Date:$897.81 Balance Due:$9,498.59 6654 10/16/03 0002 01 02 CGP1 9498-59 FINAL APPROVAL DATE SIGNATURE ^CLEARANCE §*3'° PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK EST.VAL 376 .0 Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By, Date 0709 Mi 90- Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) 997.31 Legal Description =-UL Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Use Description of Work.50. FT.#of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Name Address State/Zip Telephone #Fax* (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code! or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [55001). Name State License # Address License Class City Stats/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name Stale License # Address City State/Zip Telephone Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: Q I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. Q I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) Q CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code. Interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: Q I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale {Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). tf I. as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). Q I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. Q YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. 1 plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type ofwork):_ _____ . * /) PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? Q YES Q NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1 ,OOO feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES Q NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Crty of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. 1 ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by lhe building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become nut! and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commencd for a period of 1BOdai*?Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Daily Inspection Report For. 09/03/2004 Permit# CB032095 Title: VINE RES DEMO 900 SF SFD Description: NEW 3989SF LIV 896SF GAR 433SF DECKS Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFDR Job Address: 237 DATEAV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT JAMES E VINE Owner: Remarks: PLEASE CALL TO SET UP A TIME Inspector Assignment: DATES Reference*: Phone: 7607295060 Expire Date: 02/27/2005 Inspector: Weather:Requested By: JIM VINE CD Description 510 Finals Act Comment DESCRIPTION AND PROGRESS OF WORK ON Inspector Signature:Date: Inspection List Permit*: CB032095 Type: RESDNTL. SFDR Date Inspection Item Inspector Act 09/03/2004 510 09/03/2004 510 08/30/2004 89 08/27/2004 89 08/12/2004 89 03/15/2004 82 03/09/2004 14 03/08/2004 16 03/08/2004 84 03/02/2004 84 02/13/2004 22 02/13/2004 29 02/13/2004 39 02/04/2004 13 02/04/2004 15 02/03/2004 15 01/21/2004 83 11/24/2003 11 11/17/2003 11 11/17/2003 21 11/17/2003 24 Finals Finals Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Drywall/Ext Lath/Gas Test Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Insulation Rough Combo Rough Combo Sewer/Water Service Final Plumbing Final Electrical Shear Panels/HD's Roof/Re roof Roof/Re roof Roof Sheathing/Ext Shear Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Rough/Topout DD - PY - PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY FC Rl PA Rt NR AP AP AP AP AP AP we we AP AP CA NR AP PA AP we VINE RES DEMO 900 SF SFD NEW 3989SF LIV 896SF GAR 433SF DECK Comments COMPLETE- FINAL PLEASE CALL TO SET UP A TIME SEE NOTICE ATTACHED CHECK B VENT @ ATTIC FOR CLEARANCE SEE BACK OF CARD T.P.P.B NEED CALCS FOR FAU IN ATTIC NEED TRUSS CALCS NEED SOILS REPORT FOR 3 PAD FTG Tuesday, September 07, 2004 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE LOCATION PERMIT NO. TIME Ft FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? LJ YES FOR FUR , CONTACT. PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 03 - 2 Spencer-Lucy, Inc. Land Surveyors • Engineers 220 Linda Mar Drive Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 792-9242 JOB- 3HEET NO. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE OF — DATE. DATE. 11/14/03 TO: I MRJJ.\1ORK BUILDING DEPT. OF FOUNDATION FORMSSUHJECT: PARCEL 2,:P.M.HQ. 17155 237bATEAVE. OWNER JAMES & Hi VINE " PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ON 11/13/3 SPENCER-LUEY SURVEY COMPLETED A FIELD INSPJECf IO& OF SUBJEeT;PROJE€T FORMS AND FOUND -I 'HEM-TO BE IN SU^TANTIAt CONFORMANCE WITH THE SEX DIMENJSK^S SHOWN ON THE SITE NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Post Office Box 302002, Escondido, CA 92030 i SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES (760)480-1116 I^L FIELD DENSITY TESTS U7 I-* Job <u.~ / I ../'. '/'? r /-4v£.' . JL Sh«*f t Of > ASTM D2922 Job No. '"• 1r , MKKineNo. ?('5C-< fcv >-v}V Information To: TEST . .NUMIEt * RETEST N* 5 NORIZONTAt - LOCATION b VERTICAL - LOCATION ' •OISTURE CPM DENSITY CPM AIR GAP CPM RATIO WET DENSITY PCf HATER Mf Oftr DENSITY a PCf * % MOISTURE 9 SOIL 10 N* 10 MAX DENSITY -. i EO ut mo H % COMPACTION I , h 1 it / ( t V 1 ^ / s< ' :>>; ,-;-• ' ^ * '? 'V 7 r f1 / N't ./-.- r /yV' UT ^ ^ V /' ' /•r •Vlr , ^,/*w ^,'. V f?t fy? s&t t -i kJy Vf "jv / >/y ti-jji W< T/c, ,• r r/v -r v7 i#V/ /-,. r\/ L?A rj t t n •JT ,W! 7 7 < (: /•^ ^^ r \f 7Y o V ft -if.:: / ^ "" / /' .- "5J- . /-.. ^i. - ,: ~f^. ';",,. ^ j •* ( 0 ^v^S ,^/Jiuirfr^' on <; -j '* ,'" !' • ' 1 "i '< > ::'c'^ ;~ ' / ,/ ;?/• -x1 /•- ^J .* / i ';, ""*" • /,v.>-^^ I'- 6> - ^•yw-r,"/ JSWi 7 T ^r /-'V:^>7A ,/e . /^v /^-*C ^ -ivv/-*-^: < fx l- V-'/J -. ^ '- X., -^ /^' ,, ^ • _;;- 7 s< ^J itf-Mi /"- /-,.> /^^ .--^ / X"ffn0 »-*'- X^C7 : / ') *'" .' 'i. •'"' -j« e- •' : ft* & f< /:i •/ ^ ^ /•., . •^ ,,,, '7'^ Oat* Hour Mills -///'• -' •;;? ^- ^ :<y Mf-\ •If. Ss* ^ <...;r rv' ' ^£0 7^ 05 , r">V/ AJ.;. ^.^-; s— /> -*"" -: Xi- ^ >. . / •',"' i. ' I /n ,!•-•' i^_'fl^_ SAS* , f, - . / / y A 7$ 1 2 % 'o APPROVED BY - 2*^ ^37 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES Post Office Box 302002, Escondido, CA 92030 (760)480-1116 Bv FIELD DENSITY TESTS £a_i£Ljs ASTM D2922 Job No. _&_±S_i Sh*»» } Of / InfiormWion To: Machine No. Oat* Hour* Mife TEST HUM It 1 IETESI Nt S NOIIZONTU LOCUTION f^>7j^VERTICIL . IOOTION 7 cm DENSITY CM , j>*iy X* AIR GIF CPM 6ru 'TO MTIO MET DENSIT1rcr /CO 3"!Otf DENSITY 0 FCf + * % MOISTURE 9 t ^rr/1^. SOIL ID Ha 10 HAI DENSITY ~> t £|| % COMPACTION V A^i Vilo£&r «f/*T*U IL«•-O tei.<*" * * /rn I 0 /-^ APPROVED BY EsGil Corporation In Partnership witk government for Quitting Safety DATE: October 14, 2OO3 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2O95 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 237 Date Avenue PROJECT NAME: SFD for Vine 23 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Bert Domingo Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 10/7/03 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 *• San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership witA government for <$ui&£ing Safety DATE: September 19, 2003 Q JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWERa FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2095 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 237 Date Avenue PROJECT NAME: SFD for Vine The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. 2<] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: * James C. Vine &.A- worfkr 241 Date Avenue. Carlsbad. CA 02009 f.o- bcx /cm CAU~S6A&, CA Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. |il Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: James- (L^xH^a Telephone #: <76Q) 720-5060 ft ^0)72?. Date contacted:^12-Z-/03 (by: P- ) Fax #: Mail ^telephone Fax \^ In Person REMARKS: By: Bert Domingo Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 9/16/03 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ^ San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 03-2095 September 19, 2003 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 237 Date Avenue DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/16/03 REVIEWED BY: Bert Domingo PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2095 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: September 19, 2003 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 03-2O95 September 19, 2O03 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). THIS WILL BE CHECKED WHEN ALL THE ITEMS BELOW ARE MET. • EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 7. Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) Shall have a height of 36". b) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. Please submit calculations. 10. Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1003.3.3.8.2: NO RESPONSE. a) Minimum tread is 6 inches at any point and minimum 9 inches at a point 12 inches from where the treads are narrowest. b) Maximum rise is 8 inches. * MISCELLANEOUS 37. A continuous Chord system may be needed along the left hand side of the master's, studio and the reading room at the roof level. THE RESPONSE WAS TO SEE THE TRUSS CALCULATIONS. IT IS STILL NOT CLEAR HOW THE COMMENT WAS SATISFIED WITH THE TRUSS CALCULATIONS. 7 Carlsbad 03-2O95 September 19, 2003 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No Q The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In Partnership witfi government for Qui&fing Safety DATE: August 11, 2003 Q APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2095 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 237 Date Avenue PROJECT NAME: SFD for Vine The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Jomea C. Vine fe A- IA/^^T^I n<^ 241 Date Avcnuo, Carlcbad, CA 92009 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. X] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. ^^\ . J^ \Af .1 _c|m. * Person contacted: Jamos' * & Telephone #: (700) 720 0000 Date contacted: 5*^-^3 (by:E**-) Fax #: "7£#- Mail Telephone Fax ^ In Person REMARKS: By: Bert Domingo Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 7/31/03 tmamtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad O3-2O95 August 11, 20O3 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2095 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 237 Date Avenue FLOOR AREA: 3989 SQ. FT. REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: August 11, 2003 STORIES: TWO HEIGHT: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 7/31/03 PLAN REVIEWER: Bert Domingo FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 03-2095 August 11,2003 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC and the 1999 NEC. • FIRE PROTECTION 4. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: a) Inside each bedroom. b) Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. c) On each story. d) When sleeping rooms are upstairs, at the upper level in close proximity to the stair. e) In rooms adjacent to hallways serving bedrooms, when such rooms have a ceiling height 24 inches or more above the ceiling height in the hallway. • NOTE; Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in ajl sleeping areas of the unit. Section 310.9.1. • GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 5. Sleeping rooms shall have a window or exterior door for emergency escape. Sill height shall not exceed 44" above the floor. Windows must have an openable area of at least 5.7 square feet with the minimum openable width 20" and the minimum openable height 24". The emergency door or window shall be openable from the inside to provide a full, clear opening without the use of separate tools. Section 310.4. Please see item 35 below. Carlsbad O3-2095 August 11, 2003 6. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): Please show on the floor plan the affected glasses. a) Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. b) Doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. c) Fixed or operable panels adjacent to a door where the nearest exposed edge of the glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either vertical edge of the door in a closed position and where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above the walking surface. • EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 7. Guardrails (Section 509.1): a) Shall have a height of 36". b) Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-B. Please submit calculations. c) Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". 8. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3. a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. b) Minimum headroom is 6'-8". 9. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): a) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. b) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. c) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. Carlsbad O3-2095 August 11, 2003 10. Provide details of winding stairway complying with Section 1003.3.3.8.2: a) Minimum tread is 6 inches at any point and minimum 9 inches at a point 12 inches from where the treads are narrowest. b) Maximum rise is 8 inches. 11. The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side as required for one hour fire-resistive construction. Section 1003.3.3.9. • GARAGE AND CARPORTS 12. All elements supporting floor above garage, including walls/beams/columns supporting floor joists, must have one-hour fire-resistive protection on the garage side. Section 302.2. Please show detail for the beams and columns fire protection. 13. Show a self-closing door, either 1-3/8" solid core or a listed 20 minute assembly, for openings between garage and dwelling. Section 302.4. 14. Provide an 18" raised platform for any FAU, water heater, or other device in the garage which may generate a flame or spark. UMC Section 303.1.3, UPC Section 510.1. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 15. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. 16. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents . Carlsbad 03-2095 August 11, 2003 • FRAMING 17. Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 708.2.1: a) In concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and floor levels and at 10 foot intervals both vertical and horizontal; b) At all interconnections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces such as occur at soffits, drop ceilings and cove ceilings; c) In concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the run and between studs along and inline with the run of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished; d) In openings around vents, pipes, ducts, chimneys, fireplaces and similar openings which afford a passage for fire at ceiling and floor levels, with noncombustible materials. e) At openings between attic spaces and chimney chases for factory-built chimneys. 18. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. 19. Per UBC Section 2321.4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: a) Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. b) The design load. c) The spacing of the trusses." • MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 20. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Model name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. d) Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or UBC Table 31-B. e) Note on the plans that approved spark arresters shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) (PLEASE SHOW ON THE FLOOR PLAN THE REQUIREMENTS SHOWN BELOW) 21. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. Carlsbad O3-2095 August 11, 2O03 22. Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art. 210-52(a). 23. For a single-family dwelling unit (and for each unit of a duplex), show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling. NEC Art. 210-52 (e). This receptacle must be GFCI protected. 24. Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets comply with NEC Art. 210-52(c), which reads as follows: In kitchens and dining areas of dwelling units a receptacle outlet shall be installed at each counter space wider than 12 inches. Receptacles shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 24 inches measured horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space. Island and peninsular countertops 12 inches by 24" long (or greater) shall have at least one receptacle. Counter top spaces separated by range tops, refrigerators, or sinks shall be considered as separate countertop spaces. 25. Per NEC Art. 210-11(c)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either: a) A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or b) At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets. 26. Show on the plans a wall receptacle adjacent to each lavatory in the bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). 27. Show on the plan that receptacle outlets in hallways comply with NEC Art. 210-52(h), which reads as follows: For hallways of 10 feet or more in length at least one receptacle outlet shall be required. 28. Show at least one wall switch-controlled lighting outlet to be installed in every habitable room; in bathrooms, hallways, stairways, attached garages, and detached garages with electric power; and at the exterior side of outdoor entrances or exits. At interior stairways show 3-way switching for lighting outlets at each floor level where there are six or more steps. NEC Art. 210(a). 29. All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note clearly on the plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected." NEC Art. 210-12(b). Carlsbad 03-2095 August 11, 2003 30. Show on the plan that ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection complies with NEC Art. 210-8, which reads as follows: All 125-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20- ampere receptacles installed in bathrooms, garages, basements, outdoors, kitchen counters and at wet bar sinks. * PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 31. In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank). UPC, Section 510.5 • ENERGY CONSERVATION 32. Note on the plans: "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached certified by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing compliance with the energy calculations." • MISCELLANEOUS 33. Please show on the floor plan the type(slider, single hung, etc.) of the window. Lighting, ventilation and egress requirements will be checked. 34. Please show the material to be used for the waterproofing of the decks/balcony. 35. Please show sheet index on the cover sheet. 36. Please completely dimension the floor plans. Lighting and ventilation requirements will be checked, 37. A continuous Chord system may be needed along the left hand side of the master's, studio and the reading room at the roof level. CARLSBAD SPECIAL CODE REQUIREMENTS 14. New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). 14. Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). 14. All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy). Carlsbad 03-2095 August 11, 2003 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No a The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Bert Domingo at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 03-2095 August 11, 2003 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-2095 PREPARED BY: Bert Domingo DATE: August 11, 20O3 BUILDING ADDRESS: 237 Date Avenue BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V N BUILDING PORTION House Garage Decks Fireplaces City Estimate Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq.Ft.) 3989 896 459 3 cb Valuation Multiplier By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) 370,079 370,079 $1,381.24 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: Q Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other Hourly Structural Only Hour* Esgll Plan Review Fee $897.81 $773.49 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc City of Carlsbad DATE: BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: Public Works BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: Engi neering ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL EST. VALUE: DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Please seejhe attached report of deficiencies marked witKDJ Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. Date: Date: Date: By: By: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: Date: ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application Q Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement Agreement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application Q Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet D Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: TANIYA BARROWS City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2773 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92OO8-7314 • (760) 6O2-272O • FAX (76O) 602-8562 F:\BUILDINQPUWCHeCKCKLSTFORM.doc j Rw. T/1«W BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1 2 W D RD3 D SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow B. Existing & Proposed Structures C. Existing Street Improvements D. Property Lines E. Easements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets G. Driveway widths H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral I. Existing or proposed water service J. Existing or proposed irrigation service D 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography C. Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. D D 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION REBUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc Rn. T/14WJ BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST .,ST 2ND 350 DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE D Of D 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. D D D 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS n 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 15.000 . pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 81/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS D D D 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 75.000 . pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the F:\BUILOH4G PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: D D 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may ^• ' "" Building permit. prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement /)lpx Y' * ^ must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Future public improvements required as follows: D D D 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: D D D 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the Citv Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. D D D 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export), D D D 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: D D 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) FWUHOING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doe BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST > \£[D D 7d .No Grading Permit required. D D D 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS D D D 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: _ D D D 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 10.NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. r-^ r-, _LJ Q 11. fflf Required fees are attached Q No fees required WATER METER REVIEW D D D 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. FiWJILDINOPLANCHECKCKL5TFORM.doc c Rw. 7/14/00 tST iND ,RD n n n 12b. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand, (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA1+00 Install 2" service and 2. 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water F-\BUILOINQ PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc RW.7/1W» BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ,-ST 2ND 3*° service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. D D D 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. D D D 13. Additional Comments: F:\BUIL01NGPLANCHECKaaSTFORM.doc -7 toy. 7/14/00 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 5216 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 3 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CDP 01-27 ON 4 PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 237 DATE AVENUE . IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 1. 5 CASE NAME: VINE RESIDENCE D 6 CASE NO.: CDP 01-27 7 WHEREAS, James E. & LU Vine, "Developer/Owner," has filed a verified 8 application with the City of Carlsbad regarding property described as 9 Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 17155, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San 10 Diego, State of California, filed In the office of the County of San Diego County on June 14,1993. 11 Ohe Property"); and 13 WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request for a Coastal 14 Development Permit as shown on Exhibits "A" - **E** dated June 19, 2002, on file in the 15 Planning Department, VINE RESIDENCE H - CDP 01-27 as provided by Chapter 21.201.040 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and 17 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 19th day of June 2002, hold a 18 duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and 2Q WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony 21 and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors 22 relating to the CDP. 23 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 24 Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 25 A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct. 26 B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission 27 VINE RESIDENCE U - CDP 01-27 based on the following findings and subject 28 to the following conditions: 1 Findins: 2 1. That the proposed development is in conformance with the Mello II segment of the 3 Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies in that the site is designated for single-family and multi-family residential developments and the development is a 4 single-family house on a previously subdivided lot; no agricultural activities, sensitive resources, geological instability, flood hazard or coastal access opportunities exist onsite and the development does not obstruct views of the coastline as seen from public lands or public right-of-way or otherwise damage the visual beauty of the coastal zone. 7 2. The project is consistent with the provisions of the Coastal Resource Protection 8 Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.03 of the Zoning Ordinance) in that the project will adhere to the City's Master Drainage Plan, Grading Ordinance, Storm Water 9 Ordinance, Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) and Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP) to avoid increased urban run off, pollutants and soil erosion. No steep slopes or native vegetation is 11 located on the subject property and the site is not located in an area prone to landslides, or susceptible to accelerated erosion, floods or liquefaction. 12 3. The proposal is in conformity with the public access and recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act in that the property is not located adjacent to the shore. Therefore, the project will not interfere with the public's right to physical access to the sea and the site is not suited for water-oriented recreational activities. 15 4. That the Planning Director has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects 16 that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the17 preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15303 (one single-family residence in a residential zone) of the state CEQA Guidelines. In making this determination, the Planning Director has found that the exceptions listed in Section 19 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not apply to this project. 20 5. The project is consistent with the City-Wide Facilities and Improvements Plan, the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 1 and all City public facility policies and ordinances. The project includes elements or has been conditioned to construct or 22 provide funding to ensure that all facilities and improvements regarding: sewer collection and treatment; water; drainage; circulation; fire; schools; parks and other recreational 23 facilities; libraries; government administrative facilities; and open space, related to the project will be installed to serve new development prior to or concurrent with need. 24 Specifically, A. The project has been conditioned to provide proof from the Carlsbad Unified School District that the project has satisfied its obligation for school facilities. 27 B. The Public Facility fee is required to be paid by Council Policy No. 17 and will be collected prior to the issuance of building permit. 28 6. The project is not located in the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone, according to Map X of the Land Use Plan, certified September 1990 and, therefore, is not subject to the PCRESONO.5216 -2- provisions of the Coastal Agriculture Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.202 of the Zoning 2 Ordinance). 3 7. The project is not located between the sea and the first public road parallel to the sea and, therefore, is not subject to the provisions of the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay 4 Zone (Chapter 21.204 of the Zoning Ordinance). 5 8. The Planning Commission has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the Developer ,. contained in this resolution, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and the 7 degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. 8 Conditions; Note: Unless otherwise specified herein, all conditions shall be satisfied prior to building 10 permit. 1. If any of the following conditions fail to occur; or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so 12 implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted; deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits; deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted; institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No 15 vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Coastal Development Permit 16 2. Staff is authorized and directed to make, or require the Developer to make, all corrections and modifications to the Coastal Development Permit documents, as necessary to make them internally consistent and in conformity with the final action on the project Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved Exhibits. Any proposed 19 development different from this approval, shall require an amendment to this approval. 20 3. The Developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local laws and regulations in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Jri 22 4. If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the payment of any fees in-lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on this Project 23 are challenged, this approval shall be suspended as provided in Government Code Section 66020. If any such condition is determined to be invalid this approval shall be invalid 24 unless the City Council determines that the project without the condition complies with .. all requirements of law. 26 5. The Developer/Operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Carlsbad, its Council members, officers, employees, agents, and 27 representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees incurred by the City arising, directly28 or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Coastal Development Permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any permit or action, whether discretionary or non- PC RESO NO. 5216 -3- discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and (c) 2 Developer/Operator's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby, including without limitation, any and all liabilities arising from the emission by the 3 facility of electromagnetic fields or other energy waves or emissions. This obligation survives until all legal proceedings have been concluded and continues even if the City's approval is not validated. 6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall provide proof to the Director from the Carlsbad Unified School District that this project has satisfied its obligation to provide school facilities. 7. This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which are required as part of the Zone 1 Local Facilities Management Plan and any amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits. 10 8. Building permits will not be issued for this project unless the local agency providing water and sewer services to the project provides written certification to the City that 11 adequate water service and sewer facilities, respectively, are available to the project at the time of the application for the building permit, and that water and sewer capacity and facilities will continue to be available until the time of occupancy. 13 9. The applicant shall apply for and be issued building permits for this project within 24 14 months of approval or this coastal development permit will expire unless extended per Section 21.201.210 of the Zoning Ordinance.15 10. The developer shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all 17 interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Coastal Development Permit by Resolution No. 5216 on the property owned by the Developer. 18 Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any19 conditions of restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice Restriction. The Planning 2Q Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the Developer or 21 successor in interest. 22 11. At issuance of building permits, the Developer shall pay to the City an inclusionary housing impact fee as an individual fee on a per market rate dwelling unit basis in the amount in effect at the time, as established by City Council Resolution from time to time. 24 Enineerin: 25 General 26 12. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site 27 within this project, Developer shall apply for and obtain approval from, the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. PCRESONO.5216 13. Prior to issuance of any building permit, Developer shall comply with the requirements of 2 the City's anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is formally established by the City. 3 14. The developer shall submit to die City Engineer an erosion control plan for review 4 and approval. Said plan shall be included with the building plans for building g. permit and must be approved by the City prior to the issuance of said building permit 6 15. The portion of driveway within the public right-of-way shall be constructed of 7 asphalt concrete or other material subject to the City Engineer's approval. 8 Water/sewer 9 16. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall pay all fees, deposits, and charges 10 for connection to public facilities. Developer shall pay the San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge(s) prior to issuance of Building Permits. 11 17. The Developer shall install potable water services and meters at a location approved by 12 the District Engineer. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public 13 improvement plans. 14 18. This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for the development of the subject property, unless the District Engineer 15 has determined that adequate water and sewer facilities are available at the time of fi occupancy. Code Reminders! 17 19. Developer shall pay the License Tax on new construction imposed by Carlsbad Municipal18 Code Section 5.09.030, and CFD #1 special tax (if applicable), and the Citywide Public 19 Facilities Fee imposed by City Council Policy #17, subject to any credits authorized by Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 5.09.040. Developer shall also pay any applicable 20 Local Facilities Management Plan fee for Zone 1, pursuant to Chapter 21.90. All such taxes/fees shall be paid at issuance of building permit. If the taxes/fees are not paid, this 21 approval will not be consistent with the General Plan and shall become void. 22 20. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the 23 Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 24 21. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal 25 Code Section 18.04.320. 26 NOTICE 27 Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to for convenience as28 "fees/exactions." PCRESONO.5216 -5- You have 90 days from date of final approval to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If 2 you protest them, you must follow the protest procedure set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for 3 processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or 4 annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity charges, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this 7 project; NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise <* expired. 9 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning 10 Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 19th day of June 2002, by the 11 following vote, to wit: 12 AYES: Chairperson Trigas, Commissioners Baker, Dominguez, Heineman, Segall, White, and Whitton 14 NOES: None 15 ABSENT: None16 17 ABSTAIN: None 18 19 V ^ X—> 20 SEENA TRIGAS, Chairp< CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION 22 ATTEST: 23 24 25 MICHAEL J. Planning Director 26 27 28 PCRESONO.5216 -6- ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: 3 7~ Prepared bv:Date: , : tf f Bldg. Permit No. checked by:Date: EDU CALCULATIONS; List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ^f^T\ _ Sq. Ft/Units: _ ( Types of Use: ^De^*-QeWE(sa. Ft./Units: APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: ^f~T\ _ Sq. Ft./Units: Types of Use: _ Sq. Ft/Units: EDU's: EDU's: ADTs: ADTs: , FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1 , reduced Traffic Impact Fee)D NO D 1.PARK-IN-LIEUFEE FEE/UNIT: PARK AREA &#: X NO. UNITS:=$_ D 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADTs/UNITS:FEE/ADT:=$ D n * D 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADPs/UNITS: 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE LJNIT/SQ.FT.: S5. SEWER FEE EDU's: j BENEFIT AREA: EDU's: 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 X FEE/ADT: ZONE: X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: X FEE,EOU:,Wr X FEE/EDU: DIST. #3 =$ =$ =$ =$ ) 904% - DRAINAGE FEES PLDA ) ACRES: D HIGH t//LOW X FEE/AC: U4(&=S 8. POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION FAFEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.doc 1of2 Rev. 7/14/00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D 9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. 2of2 F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.doc Rev. 7/14/00 []DD ^ PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. V& Planner APN: Address Phone (760) 602- Type of Project & Use:_ Zoning: fj^J^ General Plan: CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation:. Net Project Density: Facilities Management Zone: _ Remaining net dev acres:. DU/AC Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) Legend: E3 Item Complete \3 Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: * YES _ NO _ TYPE _ DATE OF COMPLETION: _ Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESC. NO. PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: _ Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? \ESf^ CA Coastal Commission Authority?YES If California Coastal Commission San Diego CA 92 1 0§=44e2;^et^) 7^-2370 Determine statys^fCoasta) Permit Requiwd^r Exempt): Coastal Per^j^eterminjlipft-FdmTalready completed? YSJ^2_ NO If NO, complete C6astaTPermit Determination Form now. /~ Coastal Permit Determination Log #: _ pntact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, -?7 Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. ' ' "^ ^Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES/^ NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 2t, 1993.). j~ * '•''.'..- Data Entry Completed? YEsX NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenanc4, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) j . "fl ' ^ '~3> Site Plan: H:\ADMIN\eoUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 n n KD q)D D 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show:. North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way- width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). k 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 1. Applicability: YES {/ NO 2. Project complies YHSC U NO Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: Required Required Required Required Required 22::Shown Shown Shown Shown 30 23" 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street ir: Structure separation: 3. Lot Coverage: 4. Height: Required Required Required Required Required Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown 5. Parking:Spaces Required Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Comments OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 02/17/2004 17:21 6192B68789FEB. 17.2004 5;13PM Alpine Eng. Prod.SAN DIEGO CNTY TRUSS916 38? 1110 •PAGEno. mi BfisI'55 s* Ss"ijr"«"s2So=f ss<:! TSSSS 2,37 -i _>o tn<-i a> a> <B^ rt r» OI— j. -»,ifl13 -H tt-^tO ft f-r 3_o fflf f -> tn s<V zr— -us-i (o PT 5r«j —' « aK • 3 -M— r*ai - arr+ ^ f-r -—3- D. f» LTD I-" Q.»->M3*>o O.— O. *— in E O '•or* e< -• -> -i e> c •n •<a- m-i m *. « w o _ -»— 3B fig g s; -^p *—t Of a «•1CIB a e D r> M o^~ — o — *i • o n -i —i ™ ^ a 3- .-eis> p.*,' (fl 3 3" W —"* - CJ n>ft •c —a.Owl M O O Hm a CO m m oc: m S a mo-3 *• •vj E "• «. n ^o —•n> »e COMMERCIAL • RESIDENTIAL • ROOM ADDITIONS • • COMPETITIVE PRICES* FREE AND PROMPT ESTIMATES o Specializing in roof and floor trusses 2847 INDUSTRY STREET OCEANSIDE, CA. 92054 ICBO # AA-513 (7^)722-7696 FAX (7^?) 722- 0438 INT we Cnmpulrus, Inc. Manufacturing - EhglMartng - Computer Systems WARNINGS: 1. Read all General Notes and Warnings before construction of trusses. 2. Builder and erection contractor should be advised of ail General Notes and Warnings before construction commences. 3. 1x3 compression web bracing must be installed where shown +•. 4. All lateral force resisting elements such as temporary and permanent bracing, must be designed and provided by designer of complete structure. CompuTrus assumes no responsibil- ity for such bracing. 5. No load should be applied to any component until after all bracing and fasteners are complete, and at no time should any loads greater than design loads be applied to any component 6. CompuTrus has no control over and assumes no responsibility tor the fabrication, handling, shipment and installation of components. 7. This design is furnished subject to the limitations on truss designs set forth by the Truss Plate Institute in "Bracing Wood Trusses, HIB-91", a copy of which will be furnished by CompuTrus upon request GENERAL NOTES, unless otherwise noted: I. Design to support loads as shown. ^ Design assumes the top and bottom chords to be laterally braced at 2'-Q" o.c. and at 12'-Q" o.c. respectively. 3. 2x4 Impact bridging or lateral bracing required where shown +• +. 4. Installation of truss is the responsibility of the respective contractor. 5. Design assumes trusses are to be used in a non-corrosive environment, and are for "dry condition" of use. 6. Design assumes full bearing at all supports shown. Shirn or wedge if necessary: 7. Design assumes adequate drainage is provided. 3. Plates shall be located on both faces of truss, and placed so their center lines coincide with joint center lines. 9, Digits indicate size of plate in inches. 10. For basic design values of the CompuTrus Plate, indicated by the prefix "C", see I.C.B.O. R.R. 4211 II. The CompuTrus Net Section Plate is indicated by the prefix "CN", the designator (18) indicated 18 ga. material is used. All others are 20 ga. General Notes: Bracing to top and bottom chords not required, provided the chord members are braced throughout their length by continuous sheathing. >^ •^ V *O.CFTER SPAN CHARTS - 1988TION INCREASE = 1.26 SPACINGC.JSTER SLOPERAIOER SLOPELOAD DUo w £<o c» u>^ »- (I)to ^ g^ *" (O£1-8 o o aCN CM * o ui mCM »- <O o _. coCM "° CM iT'iCu? ui(A (A « g _* -J 3* O-_J Q p (A K H H U|o > i ^£ S £(0*3 « r><*5 1I!1"9en CM f- n GO D toto CM SInflbf-en U in r- CO a mBTRS 1£feCB r- to E r- a 5 XCM bifi.SOJ b F- b f- a CM CM fcEnIDito2 9 U) to CM a CONSTCM Sfrmtobto :«* 9En Ki to a o H*iO CM £bVCMInEn In en V TCn a STANDCM bESSob b E & Z CA 01 aitoTS So to r- Z JM1BTRw i•toTN.9n So to f- z = w 12to9ito V IY to Z z CM W !MVtob i tn Tto E Z CONSTCM ss9(Obto >. 9in Ki to Z a CO w S5initin i 01 * V Z STANDXCM 1£toZ» V BO ^ Tto tt a u.oa CM X iSCBf-01 1 in '"" CD K(A U.aa fl 1enfea> to •7 **" E K (A U.OVIen * faiiupCB at to »7 "^ b K(A aoa X iIi9en Vto * £ aei I s SIs•9s.to Tto 1^ to • a*(A U. S ^ tobCMftn V "^ EM O CO01 oXCM 9toI&tn i - b CM Q #1&BTRto to51?•* b CM Q * <oXCM. 'ahbi-T<o b CN a « 10XCM 5jeno b T 00 T Q to 10X CnCM<Bi'^* 9 *? z CACA toXCM rhi9^•» n b CM Z *1&BTR(0X iiO•9^ 1 b "9 CM Z S toX bVnb9^« 9 b in Z « toX bNL9o b T V z a »- XCM 0*?CMfeCMU) 9 EM CM tren oa (OXCM S1"*?tNin T "i b CM a: CA oo CM ieXCM binh9N £ 9 aCA etoen 10XCM toCMb»•9^ * i CM DC Z §CO (0XCM iinci9^•* n b b CM (A3 ointo toX Vn3i••9rj *9 b !n tn2 ain toX f&fttigsiac«xto§IP£ ^Sz C/5 "" ao:o ua. aILI va. ? \^ jj' <m3< *•CLEa ,U *irt r~ (N «»cn t* CM tfCto*i w"wi*•• «•Aiit in va *4Q *« CM . .S i-> •• ("« ("> CO1 * " §c;^^^•^^l^lflVQ IM tMO o m r» CD o ui o • X ISm CD ^ 09 GO ^* cn o QIi « .f) m i r« r-i csi in r-<n i i n — m ou . .U r- Q v cnce » ii N ii ii n ii n g ui r- HC h^ »** ***. **^»»:»3i»sa3 at SU.EMOQ aoc ctiMmoo.-"f-<vpm« 06 o Wc3r-*f-mmcNr-i — oo u cn CMX-M-wCNJCMCMCMCM \fl X f« m ii ii 'i ii ii ii ii U o ori IM ("i » ,n »e [•- z - •r" O VD 0, II < 6- U 1 1 CO CD CD CM O O f«< U CJr---p-CMCMCMCM -4OQ 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 SI V II 1) II II II (1 » U U as ce se « x OJ O) O O O OO C^ ^O ^ \J3 CC • I T1 1 1 1 1 U (SI CD ^)CNJGOC9CD COCn <J O * 9)II- DI-J OOOOOO-- W-4 e-r-t-i-r- krtCM "< — i -• -so— ooocnoo —wo <n « •-i o ji as ea i ™X m o CM i j i i i o —i — • ^* E£ U»— CSl/ICMOCO ^•^' = Lu O !—!«.. O -U i n o « « 5 '-"O 3 03 -u^lOCU•a'^ Ol-Hr-lb) bdtbtb>.bbO <**-H ^U^if- w i_) _i -: -: j e^ouc o a p S a "" i ii n -a •« ^ u soz QO^OO^^ ~^< ~» ~- ^ Q^ M o M rtlwcoy»-«p- mm^1 >- ^ — 'CJ i O «> r— r- — . *J<eeoz-3 c» « 2-r ._ EDUOO J '"•S1^&• e i M ii n n 11 ii a. w »« "1"S S OCMO^CMO NJ^M^ g 'S.ij O. X» O9OO9Wq>O ••••--I--1-' ~ «-«OOa CM»CM-"Cf*CM — . — . iJ f*10saaS mr-«-^-»i|i'-fi1 Cw a • . *J I- 0ova*; nfriuoaisoo o — • — — — — n ooeoS-J-so Or- -f-r-r-f--r-t- O O — ), __ J tjUO CD O O O O P- -4 _5 _3 03 *J U CN ^O CM O O fc* ^ "* CM B 5= Z 0 «M9 O O ~^ •-•U U EH fe EM iMt lu LUMBER SPECIFICATIONSSIZE SPECIE GRADE PANEL (S)TOP CHORDS:2x 6 DF |2 I- 1BOTTOM CHORDS:2x 8 DF IUBTR 1- 1 TP IIUUFRQ. ilj U"HE * TP UN2x 4 DF STAND 2-10 JJ; ""2, 6 DF 12 1, U ™ JJTC LATERAL SUPPORT <= 12"OC. UON. BC UMBC LATERAL SUPPORT <- 12"OC. UOH.O V— "^^ ill AoOOc**C Jr3LLKX5^4 ^S(X Mj H*^ tfl V'::i '»^o — = o "C QA \. :'-^~^ — • s.^™" fit X ' C/3 ~" " isi^ y « c05- GU •a! '5'S, 2 tOf3 - (U H "3 W U 2 TO ^0 _. O•"* •* ^"^ J"g 00-90-0* — "f1"^ « iw a ° "i "^ « J cn ^ S XO rH 0 ^ . ' Xj-1 S • fn ui JJT • ' ' • -"> -"V o S F7 ^ K^°5 . 5 - -P«.u/y-^1 ' ? v 3 r <*>^* § s ^ // ^ aa " ' 1 //-L (-11 s ^ - u /«f --™- • /A\^A °22& oj WV « ° i A ' «>g g S u M / . . " o» ^ r^ 52 ! S "" / h^S = ri- « r2>< « Iff"7" \ U A .. " 7 Ws °«\ii M \CD m \o • \t kOin t U ^K. I -£ S f2 >*LO ^ fn u 00 /7J 7 '/ff-^ - 3 -rH C ^ 0 /7 i, t" 'y » i «a/ ^ « g ° DID M ^"— >" 2— cn ^ \ — ' •* 5 -sA U . '-' *IT «"i7J * s *// r- i » -, 0 ^n -3° " °T3LJ M o U \ "* <= *\ i "-•\ u A >V1 vo „ V\ « 1V\ ' S e- • i-10 n r*<n uu «i -90-0 3g W "3 Ulffl 03 O - M rf u (H 3 5 IT) if) at fi m <B u*^ 9 OB O ^ <rt ^f^ m CM a ui rn aI ^ ^ CM ^rfl O CN| CN fc/1 Oo o CM CM fo ve: ui ^i" vfj ie IH f^^> >^ i— (— 1-1 -- . — •*• rl r-> CM CM •« CM n ^t in \o en CQ a tn CD ea I i I I I as r- isin CM>< • •W P- e«lOC ^* (.500 U i ICO - - O eo CM CO O O O I I I I U--.->c-j so eo as K « O IMO *• Ias w — O a O tti in j. ti. tii — — -3 -4 -4a. a. a. a< a. iS.t'K ZOCMOV «!-.— <« 2a- _ 3h- o z 3zooi =e ao <o u< <; II u II II tl O CM O W CM Q a a o o * e - C(U> '3uira(/iT3raO Mif-s°5 00-90-0 :1 '!_)_! O O O O •» -r a ^ a « U) S- a§•5 X T3 (IK-4 — -q Ja c a a•t- -r -t- —-3 -J **i O Oo» 3 aQ pu u o-r- t*o o U) «H n01 I \O CO J3n s« x « S OO -U00-90-0 i ftSfl I -* .11 *WJ 5^S«LW^w'3fi tfO C 5 Ji1°8«*?i«S'3- P'S.'S-S*.S^5tt|l!tS|£ TOjjSja J» .-'"^Itll ** U d ^ A9.H ff -«= Ss O»-fN nvuj <fl f^« »s J 1* ir Si = i*j5 ??I§1 inMiii!s?l!lil< Mbi a ffl CO OysnH a 8'S n = ui< HI*- » 51U O u Q Qz ^ aU) atri - «5 S T8 5 S UJui K ^ <U. O Ul au OT X O •» HI*•• us i—IM CM t^ £c/j EW r-I —mm(- a •» rn5uosat 3 [•*[«.2QOOS CO CHCH [•» —Ir- 3 f*j (M-. oB<• • 13 O O ee* *5w i i a uce xea =o - 00-90-0 o o o a i i CM Si I IO O O - -f- &~ E- CM ^ r o - Q a iX I Jl Ui CD (M O —O OI 3 IIfM -•O ^ CiJi as en"-O O < Qj tdi£ a. =c a o a3 I6- 10 c o o O CM o o o •» O O U> CU 'ft -nco a iii — —u*j O O ^ ifl Q, a. a.11 ii o •* o — — o t-g o •» o -4 -Ja oen r- at* o r- •+• •"c*l in CM cvj in — —en w en en—<•__•_»• \o 10-: ^ ^ _; j T-I r-a a Q 2 a O r*l O O O IT)Iu in evji xten u OTQ Q S o II S it iV VI .. s s £Q esi « t-> o o X w cu ix F co n 20-80-1 M WMM M £S* 33 <a eao OSO "3 s-nilli?iJf!FS||4a!*Hri!tHfllil!,&= i5 £s g,3 S,« o -",2 ZQ £ 03 O en ./i «-i o »a _• .-I v* —iu n n n ii n n H ii S -W ••• » CM «-• i-H r— CM CM » O O II II II II Vp-l CN l"» •» If) r-m-nw^-win-^TwcMini-i'W'Wr-'-'CM i _ « _ i , ii ii n ii it ii n I e- E- !- {-as as as asjj jj tal U> :> > > b> Eua> a.n wLu CudiW CM 1-1II — * p.o< a aCil0c co in^> !"• f< i« u in <4 <b] I IOB - - U Uce asa 01 o in in o a r— -H o i i i i 1-1 J J J .J S o o O O d O O O in Q rt o o o o H II II II o o o o _ _ _ _ CTl o o o o CM O CM O aa3 ia. u w os oado asSMS •• <O CM U !-" Wl E- <M0 as "• •• ca ws •• u S aI-H Ou fCJ O 6"u £•• o01 £H n CM bu Du« a ca a o — 55 CO-90-0 — •DUO — — ty — W >.CM CM S _ —. a CM O O O-a j= _*^ M 01 en 01« o 3 3 a•^ ^ o o o §"« JS JS ^Q BI JJ 4J JJ n S t2.3 ^ Eg x **"5 CJ « i " *? *1. tg^(N n^io « f«o o»ii J 00 CD 00O S M ig •« ruJfflali:N 0} 0) O J»S 3 3 3 3m IB 19 v P> *<S S *» 5ii i i i i •, -t n n T if] <6i V X B Z • BI ni to ID *• ni AJ IDat" Cl !fl x fi 21Hi nJ nl n* (*1 n|. <n in in in in in n 2 I I I I I H JM«nim>vinidi^U) RS S6rt rt to ui'ta m .i i < i i i i S i n i ii i H i•» ni m T in 10 t* h-1- H- t- t- »- >- x *U. IL. U-tn w via & a. a a e3 z• • • _ B BBS jiipii 3 0 a K- 3 .^cesg 5i^ Jz b w 10 <o S A 3 53 * IB >Tl cn ,i *t'lf« is8 *2-s 5 * *M * x £ i« 'I! Hipli IS!!b? i h 1 i] S iUi § . H P H » I II3 a *• PJ PIa •" *-• r-i •-"-" » X S 3»* u it n a ii « ii3C O r— r»uii— i •* 01 = ii ii 11 ii u ii a n— --<«ijr*l^'ir>'«r'-«oW i i i i i i i i EO-90-0n O U C5 fl-a o— &• = 1-3o < t- o — n OS CC m .E D OU O] 060 a o•S« 2as o oj u CM wiC9 B «• •• «O JB Ww S *MO, pu o e~M E-< Q01 ht S CM I •i & Oi CJ U eo-u-o •i •a gSS^3 3Ssl^a^s.-5!*3£ass- W5|!Sf*lSs?H!2«9^I§1 5—«H «^iri to i^ei a»2 I I" mi-l~3 IsllJ !,i!•a-a S •« 1 Z. i !fjl 00o 3C a a hi bio> a><fl W eo-90-on-•* •• M if)U fls 'II II It II H II II I (M (M CXJ CM <•>u 5s n ii n n nHI •-» PH 1*1 V if)tn \-iQ, r*i r- as "-o *-ofr- p- <M co •— « s a " S II II II("1 f ifl f_ e- e- n U •» -> E- ci ase QB 2 2 u u a. zP P s a -: < fr- < s oO O M <rt- a B-» < U K IXO CMEC •"•U 22a* cu IU EO-IT-0 12AM sFll -rf UltKli-S!?rfte 111-8-5*2?isN^s^iS s-S«23-•SflC-f f-3 So pIl|lK!j|||lsl|* n <A " S n •'-S I* t« 3 Xi U— TO3a «o is«*<• ™*S-il-a. §•§ (ft COu oZ O en00o S aU « N «afl o — cvtfi G\ f^ CV O* (D O •* ^ irt CMy CM » i i i \£ 'ii N H ii H n n n ii t- :K 2 iO CM •» O rfl Wlax CD <n o 10 ov f\i ce <a o CN ta *; .•v U (M €0-90-0 2 a = tn 2 9 Q0 5 •» = s- t- o — 1-1 7 ^^ SB ns- yS D"' "— •• <CM VI H U O I-W r- O w a a a iU •UCO-IT-O .1 -Hfll GO S3 QI^IM nVwi <o r»Jb o>2 ^ COo en CO CM f-l •- «•355Wlu£oeZ C- I"" f~ 1*1 •*ft. a*n tn CO-90-0no v i« v r~ CM o» o <a i-i r- CM tftoo CM en fi »i i i ,«*™ =5- 3 O^ 1O i—! Q O CM ^ CMCM CM i/l 41 in — -iI I I I I I I M II II K II II II <l—< CM fl •» i/l 'fi r— co l-fr-fr-£*fr"E-fr-&- m eo CM CM • *o o o -a i i o CM BU a. a, o o o -1 a VL CL Z O —CO O CO * g|t- a 3 O£ w ™^ — —*o o a ^ as53 J S S111 g i 3O E« t_ f- X«C Z O U <Q o a 3 O 3• o ~r oo <- gwi u B m a. a zzQ O M X£5 *oa n » Q a U OSa o CE CWm on »•• *7 o ^ u *~ 33 « 1'O a "7 •*: D^^^—* ^. '&\ to jcist^j"S IBSI5^55uj t5£ilfs1^5* 2« &"<*> m a tou oCO "3 ~ !ftisj=" (jWoi (oino to p^« oi2 S nil 00 03O -IH rtta 3 i£.TOPAUSta « Msgs« »a 2 S^54< s •Z 3 a ^TOENAH. TRUSSPLATE WITH 2-15OPPOSITE SIDEft f—3-16d NAILSniROUGH SPABIOCKIHTOTOP PLATE"f=- •* 1 1 k^i Ji ga C3 ina 8 I" m S S iuu. a at aUltn r u m a. f O l\S n J-(T) KAIL SPACERBLOCK TO TRUSS— \0 BACK NAIL AFTER ALL \, TRUSSES ARE ESECTED\ .i4JXJ , i X + u LZXCJ i^ 4- X IJX!.— 1-r ^202oi-cnh-<^JAcooacMB-i ^^^SC^ £|8d|<I<^118^|| §i|^*^S^5^ _i Ula o KUJ OU oztu UL aa § o I oto yjina in CM UlK f*0)603 1 Ul to aUl STS i§3n£ eM 23 £e SatO >*»ul «09 ^O it < 1112 <a o Ul —II d s — —. —2 v^^ ^u. . CO tO COQ. Q. Q. IIlif X 5> ul OJO £ Ul (3 yfc <0 ve'In •9 tn V fe CM VO V Al g oict^ 00 Ul fJ O — <rui o cs (OUlo I VI VI tN 3X <N Ul .Ula til r»t fn —Q_ « -o T1 o 3 "i -:is r*i r- « (L. || it it 5* n So o COUia O IN z iii .. S gfcu. a tr . 9.7004 4:16PM Alpini Em. 1W 915387 1110 •ami P. 8 Alpine Engineered Products, Inc. 1 oT f OaawMAt |D:lS9AMXM20tOP|«94> Diegt Co. Irm ftifor* lulldiflf Code ABSI/TPMW5($TO)/l«C Alpine propritUry truss inilysU soft wire, Version* 5.02. 7.00. ftoof - 35 ty • 1.25 Duration t/ riotr • I/A - M RW (ASCI- 7-93-Clcsed] Nniui 1. Dttcririiutiofl as to tke, suitabiKtj of these truti coifioaents for t(« structkrt Is tlit resvoHiblMty of the tall41 ft) desiimr/cDgUeer of recortf. as defiittf In AISI/TPJ 1-IS9S Scctlci Z.2 2. As shaun M attached drawings; the draviqj Mibtr is preceded by; UUSR6OT* Da SUndard Details Stitalttcd t>j OK 14:21:44 01-09-200* t Rtvlwer: JCJ 1*1 44123 --fHfllSTSCT 64JZ4 -HT48T5T6FT 1 «412e»HT48TST6t win--i 3 4 5 6 7a 9 10 11 6*130 BT48T5TKTSTM 04flOMMfi 01/09/04 04009M7 U/M/M 040e»ZB 01/M/M WMM4fl Ol/M/04 04009049 01/09/04 04QOH50 01/09/04 04M90SI 01/09/04 040M031 01/09/04 040M032 01/09/04 04009QS2 01/V9/04 04DOaOS3 01/89/04 SMI 01/OWM04 ^REVIEWED Q REJECTED Q REVISE AND RESUBMIT FURNISH AS CORRECTED Corrections or comments made on the shop drawings during this review do not relieve contractor from com- pliance with requirements of the drawings and specifications. This check is only for review of general conformance with the design concept of the project and general compliance with the information given in the contract documents. The contractor is responsible for confirming and correcting all quantities and dimensions; selecting fabrication processes and techniques of construction; coordinating his work with that of all other trades; and performing his work in a safe and satisfactory manner. The structural integrity of items shown in these shop drawings are the sole responsibility of the Contractor's Engineer, not TH&A, INC. STUB -o / U1C.UU LiMI t I F-JL4J c*° i*fim hf*Uii!KiB • »• _ _ ^ •• « n *» DODDOQO GOOD Qi D D3DDQ QDOOOBOOlTG 81/21/20B4 11:55 6192868789 SAN DIEGO CNTV TWJSS PAGE "S- 8*5 r £ S - i— ui *u (/I l/l «/J t/l *JE?Se-Ss JfiSflr^s".si s* .a«s**B4i* -'-g-WftSt*cP»ei^i;l,sfil-« si%if;tif^i!i'S'sKfefiS. ,uBf»ElF— ,s3-c<_5*SC^StS » EX -««4l> &<• 3« ••)* - ' -tf^m ijnq &51^'1i!Hii!!*i.-!K> HSHili^vsMv;X3*u»5B«ilvB*iii>< e=-3 6 • . • •» — • -Do _• c •"* 5 _e at « i^t L. 31_ Q. Q i^,U- CD •* £K «>esi — ^ t. O ** ** ? B•« 006 *• V —•-4 «*l U*. « r» »_ ^ • *O — «fc (5 r^ r-iS - i: 2 ES•— o»- in uu c Jj «• — £ « s £ lPi!^3»f #Z ..Et^ frl '"Dill WC 916 -»«3 "!fllV IU6l->•6 "NVf" • Sefcr- s a- wfe» I »«ti emi-— •* fII li9i 8;« LU OLU Of V*UJ*/> EC. UJ_J a. oo a uj •- ;> 5^.i j> 0 01kd K *V V V Ut P £«b £ »•" > - nw E5 ft w *^ *• o aa B. *-•> • IX » * — c i. >* « », -o — nj£S 1^a- ^s £ £ -I! s I— > Oi3 ;= S LTjS " i ^*•-< cu fz•i I * £J *•* v I * 1 5 ::• * li. L- U. U. *tA. 0. 0. CL &O o a o -* o e S i:?f! B|»S!SSSS- B3B- 5«Zt111"*S«E *Z » *sfSrl nsRe<i-7jSSS. . =6tS^tf. I * t *-S»«*Se SS! iS^ai'i*?!{; ip«|ih| II! i -,=l!ff \\ i'if \\ !l«- -f.-^tps:ji||j Ji£ik||||$ -—• « B"^*? Sim*• •&«£ S V«Bfc^*^.^ fills MiiiHiii otti m 915 wort toors w BJ/21/2884 11:55 B192B6B799 SAN DIEGO CNTV TRUSS PAGE 87I =3 OUiof LU- => •4 A ^ p oS* ^ a .= O•« «.- «1 UJ"* * _ H '9 *• «. O O ift m. _j Seoa^ «s — . • e •« " » ~*C ES'SP *S W IT ^ ^ |A ^ hi fc •-•• u «e ^ ^ o *• -««««S fe|5E "1 O K O "wi u 'e a B09 S « * * * C^«« » "W-»^ *^ SSg§ s£ -|3g - ^ O O ^^ Ul tW f* K I* ** ^att-BXaeot &.•<>* • o •- v- r- *^ r 3?£ B *jr -c * MU M* «L * Ss i a < r « g*- * -~ M *H »_ < . I*«. |; I 1• r~*• i •o 7 N s ,v* t/i tn isi fto. a. a- «- e. _J Q O —1 *-U U CJ U O N ssisj »f* il»|is!|»| file" !f i! lit ill ia» mtw Olil /«E 916 WOZ ej/21/2884 11:55 6192B6B7B9 SAN DIEGO CNTV TRUSS PftGE OB r- A <X*»•-• 3 !•• S t. e <»>aw «» * *»)*M B C ik«l*Mrutu * si *. • 3HM LMC.OU r«uc. t/3*- j»B» a. *..M c u-O — t-c u M * S ** ^ .^ ^ Lit — !£ *-•! 3 -t* E W O •M A — M• * 5 _i 5 K o *tg — cs i * rrs M A! e a H.A a.W •> W JC C M» £ >>• ft4 fc e*< • «•«»" 3 * **5vi a^ u v ar — _*_M _< a • — B ""• - ^ >> ec L.m- i«c? -a w•* e «K X M at K.B* «i w•••UN — 3 t • M •»__ »« u.«n -o 9V *V •* » W(. «. -A ^ -. - » -D a** !• — t* •* w•S-5" S S-25 € §*.« s ssss = -£& = 5*i 5 S Lsil? 1=3? !. cjfCjr- 14;:^; klti^*;fl*«:Ei* jiii! Iiii«^_*» <»• (Eli!i ill !l ,P«UK£|Mhhi ^|HE».i"•«5£|||J II OIU IVf 11:55 &192B687B9 SAN DIEGO CNTV TRUSS PAGE IB55o —c?o n U » S M-Q ™ T- " *> T * * *^ *-• u* * ft £ 9 •-«.»« «""Ck A 4-> V r— »• e <c * a *• e:w » T- B. u e*M »» r- V «- • — 2 ^ =«"^T' •* -* * OIM 4~ *j • at^t * » -^y«_Q =•v »- « 4 *O i- tv— — «i -• B>^ Si MO »- h. •— Wt " S gf &*•£ k B «* 4J ik, I*. U.*yi w> to& a. Q. iSsS« CsissIlS?L^p is|H!;!&l;l> iJEi 1*1: lilii 5 wj? sBtofl « ?i!i;i &|9Hj!itl! iHlsRil! jiS^i |«|l^|j** 91 r •»vr 81/21/2884 &192BbH/t»* I-t, •Is 1 ?9 k 5 ** 01 o w T? £^ £ ^1? » * -4SJ! 5 «. 0 — E «-» O-•- £ ^ *c1 N&«a n01 wig^ « S S^t S ^ — * *> sssra? fc S «+ t Qk^ t r-5 = s 5. 1 U V* D W 3** i— u O-*1 t* » — r- <• ?> ^-^ '3' .H fcf >sl & ea ii4 lifl! liii^l^i^3ssi!m miKI KK«m*WrfHM t.M M»onBmr <• (Hi»iMB(i«M«Mi.(IK nit I1MHI «t fa»WfHN 11 1*. ttlTIHt AMIMH MfM M. tfl.l) 4HI.M rtM HU& MdlTitk rfnM W VIcMM VC.J.mnitit" HUiTfH IM•» XH tlU»JK tl »• O4UH*= ! H!Ww!sES lliH IPf*»dir»i*i• * &v ii!n.JIll i:!!**!!::.«zsS3^* •I !6|!!5«a|«S -r•«i>3«i?>i¥«!|W"Ssrsll-sr2*i*:5ss aJ flsFl' »&lfl|9!f>2i~;lie!*i|¥&-*B«s<|{, a •(mum mi 6 .81/21/2984 1J:55 &1928W789 SAN DIEGO CNTV PAGE 12°?* ~SB9- a •*uj r* z 2 s « » K — ui tO zzacoj-r « u u ia 3 si rt « tv* ** co a o ~«O• s "*• r ?*- fe2 -VMi e •p1 ss• Jj . £ Si$ ta •« a> .S.S * « u«k«J oeU) m S «*t.W 3-S 35"*» «ii > .a 1/1 Dl -J O T,M ?r I t M1 t •if\ t • t5 -f Oil I m 9Lfi '•«••!¥ O o a o "iVt. flli!S;ES; !ljt?I'ips sls^ir- Si.1 lA *• £E&c,IMS EiUili^PtM :|fss ¥nll"i£!«sitl-S IhjimslPsf ? Li«=' IPl iyt*: *|* *1P3P,6 f) ;!*» i^s«f»s;:«?*£•!( is f4ii.il*! ;S*!?SEE igi Hi rif=l*s;£i.i i«*fM mut1| MlfMTWi»«*••.ii a* «t0i \f~3O (b"I *«T •> m^sss*& in H** * ! ^J 5a: S uJ S _ *jQ_ iji » tw» 5 £i c e ^ ^ v- —o* is w r- -^ KI•^ * — _j — jf «A e ja * * ITo S ^ fe S a, jju8 ^ "» **^ u. u. a MO S c» w v. a D » \ 51 •- mH> ^9 U* n » S >— _ vi T) -00•- A s d Olll HE *a!MY 'Si ii?«* ;»! 4*2 5-S|| flls"*1 s55f: 'a:st r ""a*.. ll»g| ;fS| i&:fl h:'i;if?S=* i I!l5 ? •SKI inisHill!••SSit*1?*™ *. — » — • -waff: wore • aaz 3NIA 01/21/2004 11:55 6192868789 SAN DIEGO CNTY TRUSS PAGE 14SS*ufc*fc Cft —I •NC U 1? 4. 9 u O r~ ** <vc e g If *•"* la *•5 « « t — u ft » 3 W «3 A L Bl WipTjS a IM »3 *" * * £ 2 S S U% £ D Q B- ^ P» 5 10v S Oo.a.0 O e i 61' ' t« w» 5> wt i/>tt. A. GL O. O. V IA O pi!;«i*j!il iaf«sf|! pi?.rS3- «i^sm*« ivr CCI0I * J -bay TT:/TPI I89B5 cftJOD 3NIA M* t J-ii 3HW UJ.C.UU UNIT I KU33 r«ot 13I ~o f*o •De e S *£ -g•^ * • oo- srs s??w .r- i— «j— I. » «- ID g - ** O . - E ft — 3 _. *2 ** ac I I - •• » n * * mi S* D O mm tn ;' O 5 r^ iv is. t> •- o p * ^ S B S 5S 8 U v( 1/1 W a a tl 'd dill 916 9Uld[y" UU.ti.ii. 4,S-;i |!C*b!iilbfl! te"!* liifi fsll? Miiiii ss«3 ^o?>:£i=il! |Hi!f!tesibS« Still jljfife8^fS^-aKS» :=syj EBEii^sa^8*-*; 5-:as::aii« hi! li'P^IPs!i& riisiMid MOZ'6 ' JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondkio, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. DATE. TH&A, INC. Engineering ond Code Consultants 125 We$t Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondldo, CA. 92025 1%U (TBO) 74M11I, F«xi (760) T41-04M STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS PROJECT: VINE RESIDENCE 237 DATE A VENUE CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA DATE; JULY 28,2003 PROJECT NO.; W-44 joa. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Coda Consultant* 125 West Mission Av«. Suit« 201 E*cond]do, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY- CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. DATE. Notes; . Structural calculations are for the analysis or design of primary structural systems .d elements. Other connections and attachments of non-structural elements, or systems are the responsibilities of the architectural designer unless they are shown otherwise by the Engineer. '. TTiis calculations and specifications are for this address only. Any other use is not allowed and Engineer shall not be responsible for the unauthorized use. . Architectural designer is responsible for all applicable sketching details on plans which should represent required framing conditions, details needed for construction purposes. 115*011 Snmit XA 11PKBMI /A«ra»7«l~:,, bat* tuu OIHI TH&A.iNC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE "PH OF DATE. DATE. FROM OLD.I. t- I ,..€,.. |p .Q\ nit-!L..&P ,74<?.pH U. 4^4 C U£L WflA X:./4x i/-o f b A ;I'C?:X I- e? •s- •£?/-ly&yvi .^^ v I./5 C-» ,/ 0 A (.ft/ <Ij&d0/$0o ..C-* 41 /oR. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 JOS. §HEET NO.. CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF. DATE. DATE. 0-1-03 RB-1 Roof Beam TJ-Bftam(TM) 8.02 Serial Number 700201S808 3 1/2 X 14 2.0E ParflllBITr® PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagram i* Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Drop Beam Member. Tributary Load Width: 1* Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Uve Dead Location Application Comment Uniform(plf) Ftoor(1.00) 368.0 525.0 0 To 131 Adds To SUPPORTS: 1 Stud watt 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Uve/Dwd/UpllWTotal 3.50" 3.97" 2392/3512/0/5904 3.50- 3.97" 2392/3512/0/5904 Detail Other L1: Blocking 1 Ply 1 114" 1.3E TimbarStrand® LSL L1: Blocking 1 Ply 1 1/4" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSL -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): L1: Blocking -Bearing length requirement exceeds input at supports) 1,2. Supplemental hardware is required to satisfy bearing requirements. DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear <lbs) 5752 -4579 9473 Passed (48%) Moment (Ft-Lbs) 18216 18216 27162 Passed (67%) Live Load Defl (in) 0.151 0.422 Passed (U999+) Total Load Defl (in) 0.371 0.633 Passed (L/409) Location Rt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:L/360,TL:U240). -Bracing(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&AJnc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 EscondkJo, CA 92029 Copyright 9 £001 by Trus Joist, a Hayerhaeuset Business Par all an* is a registered trade nark of Trus Joist. lWr>r,s TJ-B»am(TM) 6.02 Swial Number 7002015608 3 1/2" X PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Drop Beam Member. Tributary Load Width: V Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Uve Dead Location Application Comment UnifomXpH) Ftoor(1.00) 48.0 168.0 OToff Adds To Point(lbs) FloorO .00) 1840 2185 8' Uniform(plf) F(oor(1.00) 368.0 525.0 ff To 101 Adds To SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wail 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Uve/Dead/Uplift/Total 3.50- 3.50" 645/1393/0/2037 3.50" 3.80- 2315/3339/0/5654 Detail Other L1: Blocking 1 Ply 1 1/4' 1.3E TimberStrand© LSL L1: Blocking 1 Ply 1 1/4' 1.3E TimberStrand® LSL -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detsJI(s): L1: Blocking -Bearing length requirement exceeds input at support(s) 2. Supplemental hardware is required to satisfy bearing requirements. Location Rt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear (Ibs) -5503 -4330 9473 Passed (46%) Moment (Ft-Lbs) 8562 8562 27162 Passed (32%) Live Load Deft (in) 0.036 0.322 Passed (U999+) Total Load Defl (in) 0.097 0.483 Passed (U999+) -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:U360,TL:U240). -Bracing(Lu): Alt compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design bads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A. Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido. CA 92029 Copyright 6 2001 by Trua Joist, a Weyerhaeus»r Business PacallaraS is a registered trademark of Tens Joist. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondldo, CA. 92025 JOB. SHEET NO..OF. CALCULATED BY, CHECKED BY SCALE DATE, DATE. ?- RB-4 Roof BeamA^^—--N*—-r^_ TJ*«am{TM) 8.02 S«ri»J Number 7002015808 3 1/2 X 14 2.0E ParallaiTI® PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED 121 Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1' Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Uve Dead Location Application Comment Uniform(ptf) Ftoor(1.00) 368.0 515.0 OTo12* AddsTo SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length LIve/Dead/UpllR/TotaJ 3.50" 3.62" 2208/3182/0/5390 3.50- 3.62" 2208/3182/0/5390 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A3: Rim Board -Bearing length requirement exceeds input at support(s) 1, 2. Supplemental hardware is required to satisfy bearing requirements. DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear (Ibs) 5240 -4080 9473 Passed (43%) Moment (Ft-Lbs) 15283 15283 27162 Passed (56%) Live Load Defl (in) 0.111 0.292 Passed (U999+) Total Load Defl (in) 0.270 0.583 Passed (U519) Location Rt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:U480,TL:L/240). -Bracing(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 218" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copyright 6 2001 by Trus Joist, a Weyerhaeuser Business ParaHam* is a registered trademark of Trus Joist. T\ \\fcwiti TJ-Beam(TM) 6.02 Serial Number 7002015808 B-5 Roof Beam 3 1/2" x 14" 1.5E^TlrnberStrand® LSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagram i« Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1' Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Live Dead Location Application Comment Uniform(ptf) Floor(1.00) 48.0 115.0 0 To 8' Adds To Unrtorm(pK) Ftoor(1.00) 368.0 495.0 81 To 13 Adds To SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Uve/Deod/UpliWTotal 3.50" 3.50" 607 /1195 /O / 1802 3.50" 3.50" 1617/2394/0/4011 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® -See TJ SPECIFf ER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A3: Rim Board DESIGN CONTROLS: Shear (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) Live Load Defl On) Total Load Defl (in) Maximum -3865 8507 Design -2731 8507 0.082 0.218 Control 13067 21136 0.317 0.633 Control Passed (21%) Passed (40%) Passed (U999+) Passed (U697) Location Rt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:L/480,TL:U240). -Bractng(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 218" ofc unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design toads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not ail products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copyright © 2001 by Tcus Joist, a Weyeihaeusei Business TimijijcSttajidB is a E«gistecBd trademark of Trus Joist. RB-6 Roof Beam ••^r^V-^TT^TJ-BeamfTM) 8 02 Serial Number 7002015806 3 1/2" X 14" 1 .5E TJITlberStrand® LSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Overall Dimension: 16' I -12"-Product Dtagr«n is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1' Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Live Dead Location Application Comment Unrform(prr) Ftoor(1.00) 64.0 146.0 0 To 161 Adds To Potm(lb6) Fioor(1.00) 607 1195 16" SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wait 2 Stud wall Input Width 3.50" 3.50" Bearing Length 3.50" 3.50" Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Uve/DeaoVUplifUTotat 385/425/0/810 1509/3345/0/4854 Detail Other A3: Rim Board E1: Blocking -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detailfs): A3: Rim Board.EI: Blocking 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® 1 Ply 1 1/4" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSL DESIGN CONTROLS: Shear (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) Live Load Defl (in) Total Load Defl (in) Maximum Design Control Control Location 2735 2439 13067 Passed (19%) Right OH under Floor loading -9404 -9404 21136 Passed (44%) Right OH under Floor ALTERNATE span loading 0.095 0.207 Passed (2U999+) Right OH under Ftaor ALTERNATE span loading 0.228 0.415 Passed (2U436) Right OH under Floor ALTERNATE span loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:L/480,TLU240). -Bracing(Lu): AH compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2 8" ofc unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. -The load conditions considered in this design analysis include alternate member pattern loading. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software wilt be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copjiight © 2001 by Tina Joist, a Wayerhaeviser Business TiniberStrand* is a registered trademark of Trus Joist. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA, 92025 SHEET NO., £, CALCULATED BY, CHECKED 8Y SCALE &L DATE. DATE. -T"-^ /•*• ^ 7 PROOUa W-1 ISinftt SkMl) W-1 (PMM) ^«?B IK.. liraW, Mra. OMF1. To 0^ PHOW ML FREE 1-m>-i2!43M \ \Xfcyeriiamser Ru-nisriv TJ-Beam(TM) 6.02 Serial Number 7002015806 User 2 7««l31:57:5ePM Page 1 Engine Version: 1.2.1 ,RB-7RoofBeam 3 1/2" x 14" 1.5E TimberStrand® LSL Overal Dimension: 8' Product Diagram i* Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1' Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Live Dead Location Application Comment Point(lbs) Floor(1.00) 1509 3345 81 SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Its) Width Length Uve/Dead/UpHftrTotal 3.50" 3.50" -569/-1223/-1795/-1795 3.50" 4.55" 2078/4688/0/6766 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® E1: Blocking 1 Ply 1 1/4" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSL -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A3: Rim Board,E1: Blocking -Bearing length requirement exceeds input at support(s) 2. Supplemental hardware is required to satisfy bearing requirements. DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear (Ibs) 4886 4866 13067 Passed (37%) Moment (Ft-Lbs) -10450 -10450 21136 Passed (49%) Live Load Defl (in) 0.026 0.200 Passed (2U999+) Total Load Defl (in) 0.084 0.215 Passed (2L/614) Location Right OH under Floor loading Right OH under Floor ALTERNATE span loading Right OH under Floor loading Right OH under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:L/480.TL:U240). Additional checks follow. -Right Overhang:(LL:0.200", TL2U240). -Upim exceeds 1000 Ibs for total load. -Uplift exceeds 1000 Ibs for unbalanced load. -Bracing(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2* 8" ofc unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. -The load conditions considered in this design analysis include alternate member pattern loading. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. -Dead toad on portion of joist area is less than minimum allowed. -Live toad on portion of joist area is very low. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copyright © 2Q01 by Tula Joist, a Weyeihaeuser Business Timber Strands is a ragiatered trademark of Trus Joist. JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO..3L OF. CALCULATED BY, CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Avc. Suite 201 EscondMo, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED SY_ CHECKED BY SCALE. OF DATE, DATE, TJKgtfPro(TM)- "~"~" SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED TJ-Beam(TM) 6.02 Serial Numbw. 7002015808 Us«r2 7/26/03 2:12:19 PM _ Paae1 Engine V^on: 1.2.1 THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEED Product Diagram is Conceptual, LOADS: Analysis is for a Joist Member. Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 40.0 Live at 100 % duration, 12.0 Dead SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Uve/Dead/U pim/Total 3.50" 2.25" 507/152/0/659 3.50" 2.25" 507 /152 / 0 / 659 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Pry 11 /4" 0.8E T J-Strand Rim Board® A3: Rim Board 1 Pty 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A3: Rim Board DESIGN CONTROLS: Shear (Ibs) Vertical Reaction (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) Live Load Defl (in) Total Load Defl (in) TJPro Maximum 644 644 2993 Design -638 644 2993 0.282 0.367 42 Control 1710 1170 5418 0.465 0.929 30 Control Passed (37%) Passed (55%) Passed (55%) Passed (L/790) Passed (U608) Passed Location Rt. end Span 1 under ROOT loading Beating 2 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading Spanl -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:U480,TL:U240). -Allowable moment was increased for repetitive member usage. -Deflection analysis is based on composite action wfth single tayer of 19/32", 5/8" Panels (20" Span Rating) GLUED & NAJLED wood decking. -BracJng(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at "2 8" ofc unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. TJ-Pro RATING SYSTEM -The TJ-Pro Rating System value provides additional floor performance information and is based on a GLUED & NAILED 19/32", 5/8" Panels (20" Span Rating) decking. The controlling span is supported by walls. Additional considerations for this rating include: Ceiling - None. A structural analysis of the deck has not been performed by the program. Comparison Value: 1.62 ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software devetoped by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of fe products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copyright © 2001 by Tcus Joist, a Heyerhaeusec Business TJI* ana TJ-Beam» are registered trademarks of Trus Joist. B-T JoiBt"1, Pro™ and TVI-pro™ are trademark! of Trus Joist. FB-1 Beam —-\_-——T^Beam(TM) 802 Serial Number 7002015808 3 1/2" X 14 2.0E P3rail3171® PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagrtm is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1' Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Live Dead Location Application Comment Uniform(plf) Ftoor{1.00) 580.0 351.0 0 To 131 Adds To SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (fbs) Width Length LJve/Dead/UpUnTTotal 3.50" 4.14- 3770/2381/0/6151 3.50" 4.14" 3770/2381 /0/6151 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A3: Rim Board -Bearing length requirement exceeds input at support(s) 1, 2. Supplemental hardware is required to satisfy bearing requirements. DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear (Ibs) 5993 -4771 9473 Passed (50%) Moment (Ft-Lbs) 18978 18978 27162 Passed (70%) Live Load Defl (in) 0.237 0.317 Passed (U641) Total Load Defl (in) 0.387 0.633 Passed (U393) Location Rt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Ffoor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:L/480,TLU240). -Bracing(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2* 8" ofc unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copyright © 2001 by Ttua Joiat, a WeyBihaauaer Business ParallamX is a cagistarad trademark of Trus Joist. J£^^^M JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondklo, CA. 92025 SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE. OF DATE. DATE. FB-3 Floor Beam T^mrrMj^s^Nom^^i^as 3 1/2" x 11 7/8" 2.0E Parallam® PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Drop Beam Member. Tributary Load Width: 1' Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Uve at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Live Dead Location Application Comment Point(lbs) Ftaor(1.00) 6670 4136 2 UnifomXptt) Ftoor(1.00) 55.0 100.0 OToS1 Adds To SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Detail Width Length Uve/Dead/UplitVTotal 3.50" 5.25" 4677/3137/0/7814 LI: Blocking 3.50" 3.50" 2323/1677/0/4000 L1:Bbcking Other 1 Ply 1" e-Rim Board® 1 Ply 1" e-Rim Board® -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detal(s): L1: Blocking -Bearing length requirement exceeds input at supports) 1. Supplemental hardware is required to satisfy bearing requirements. DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear (Ibs) 7786 7599 8035 Passed (95%) Moment (Ft-Lbs) 13992 13992 19902 Passed (70%) Live Load Deft (in) 0.057 0.189 Passed (U999+) Total Load Defi (in) 0.095 0.283 Passed (L/714) Location Lt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:U360,TL:U240). -Bracing(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 218" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not ad products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOtST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A,lnc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copyright 4> 2001 by Trus Joist, a Weyeihaeusei Business Parallam® is a registered trademark of Trus Joist. FB-4 Floor Beam T^BeamfTM) 6.02 SeriaJ Number 7002015B08 5 1/4" X 14" 2.0£ PS 1*3118111® PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1' Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Live Dead Location Application Comment Point(lbs) FtoorO-00) 3758 6683 4' Unrtorm(pK) Ftoor(1.00) 200.0 66.0 OTolO1 Adds To SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Lh/e/Dead/UplltVTotal 3.50" 3.50" 3268/4478/0/7746 3.50" 3.50" 2490/3095/0/5585 Detail Other A1: Blocking 1 Ply 1 1/4" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSL A1: Blocking 1 Ply 11/4" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSL -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A1: Blocking DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear (Ibs) 7697 7324 14210 Passed (52%) Moment (Ft-Lbs) 27383 27383 40743 Passed (67%) Live Load Defl (in) 0.080 0.242 Passed (U999+) Total Load Defl (in) 0.195 0.483 Passed (L/595) Location U. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:L/480,TLL/240). -Bracir>g(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copyright © 2001 bj Trus Joist, a Waysrhaeuser Bus ParallomS is a registered trademark of Trua Joist. FB-7 Beat..—v^ TJ-BaamfTM) fl.02 Serial Number 7002015808 5 1/4" X 14" 2.0E ParailflmOD PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1* Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Live Dead Location Application Comment Point(lbs) Ftoor(1.00) 522 960 3* Unrtorm(ptf) Fteor(1.00> 600.6 260.0 OTo3 Adds To Untform(plf) Floor(1.00) 370.0 191.0 31 To Iff Adds To SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Live/Dead; Uplift/Total 3.50" 3.50" 4019/2688/0/6706 3.50" 3.50" 3113/1903/0/5016 Detail Other A1: Blocking 1 Ply 1 1«" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSI A1: Blocking 1 Ply 11 /4" 1.3E TimberStrandfii LSL -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A1: Blocking DESIGN CONTROLS: Shear (Ibs) Moment (F\-l_bs) Live Load Defl (in) Total Load Defl (in) Maximum 6559 20718 Design 5419 20718 0.254 0.420 Control 14210 40743 0.392 0.783 Control Passed (38%) Passed (51%) Passed (L/740) Passed (L/448) Location Lt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:L/480,TL:U240). -Bracing(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2" 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants Hie sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copvright © 2001 by Trus Joist, a Weyathaaussr Business Parallam® ia a registered trademark of Trua Joist. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondklo, CA- 92025 PflCXlua 704-1 |SingHSHm|iie-1II>MiM)^M7,Mc-.Gninn. Urn. flHH.h FB-8Beam—"V——•*•—• TJ-B«amfTM) 6.02 Sefial Numbar 70CG015806 7 X 18 2.0E PHtS! 13111© PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagram Is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1* Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Point(lbs) Point(lb6) Point(Ibs) Unjform(ptf) SUPPORTS: Class Floor(1.00) Ftoor(1.00) Floor(1.00) Floor(1.00) Live 168 3113 3770 54.0 Dead 336 1903 2381 96.0 Location 4' 61 Application Comment OTo23- AddsTo 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Width 3.50* 3.50" Bearing Length 3.50" 3.50" Veitical Reactions (Ibs) Uve/Dead/UpliftrTotal 3710/3653/0/7363 4583/4083/0/8666 Detail Other A1: Blocking 1 Ply11M" 1.3E TirnberSUand® LSL A1: Blocking 1 Ply1 1/4M.3ETirnberStrand®LSL -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for details): A1: Blocking DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear (Ibs) -8634 -8326 24360 Passed (34%) Moment (Ft-Lbs) 39850 39850 87330 Passed (46%) Uve Load Defl (in) 0.319 0.567 Passed (UB53) Total Load Defl (in) 0.619 1.133 Passed (L/439) Location Rt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading i/ -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:L/480,TL:U240). -Bracing(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2" 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT? The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copyright. © 2001 by Trus Joist, a W«yerha*us*r Business ParallamS is a registered trademark of Trus Joist. JOS,ay. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.OF. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE. DATE. DATE. Ru-inntTJ-Bcam(TM) 6.02 Serial Number 7002015808 FB-11 Beam 3 1/2" x 14" 2.0rParallam® PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1' Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Live Dead Location Application Comment Point(lbs) Ftoor(1.00) 3036 5120 516" FteOf(1.0Q> 54.0 20.0 OTotV Adds To SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Uve/Dead/UplirVTotal 3.50" 3.50" 1815/2754/0/4569 3.50" 3.50" 1815/2754/0/4569 Detail Other A1: Blocking 1 Ply 1 1/4" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSI A1: Blocking 1 Ply 1 1/4" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSL -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A1: Blocking DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear (Ibs) 4554 -4439 9473 Passed (47%) Moment (Ft-Lbs) 23019 23019 27162 Passed (85%) Live Load Defl (in) 0.114 0.267 Passed (U999+) Total Load Defl (in) 0593 0.533 Passed (L/437) Location Rt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL-L7480,TL:L/240). -Bracing(Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2* 8" ofc unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Eacondido, CA 92029 Copyright © 2001 by Ti\ia Joint, a Woyorhaouser Business Parallaro® is a registered trademark of Trus Joist. JOS. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. DATE. p :«.^.I^«K;n*. HE* IP.\ FB-12Beam TJ-Se«m(TM) 6 02 Serial Number. 7002015808 5 1/4** X 14" 2.0t ParallaiTl® PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED ET ir Product Diagram Im Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1* Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Live Dead Location Application Comment Untfofm(prt) Fbor(1.00) 86.0 214.0 OTo11' Adds To Point(lbs) Ftaor(VQO) 5332 6423 36" SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 StudwaH Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Wkrth Length Uve/Dead/Upf in/Total 3.50" 4.44" 4180/5719/0/9899 3.50- 3.50" 2158/3311/0/5469 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Stmnd Rim Board® A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A3: Rim Board -Bearing length requirement exceeds input at supports) 1, Supplemental hardware is required to satisfy bearing requirements. DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear fibs) 9645 9428 14210 Passed (66%) Moment (Ft-Lbs) 31024 31024 40743 Passed (76%) Live Load Defl (in) 0.108 0.267 Passed (U999+) Total Load Defl (in) 0.256 0.533 Passed (L/499) Location Lt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:L/480,TL:L/240). -Bracing(Lu); All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2* 8" o/c unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. •Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS, -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Ccipyright C 2001 by Trus Joist, a Wsyechaauaai Business Parallora* is a registered trademark of Trua Joist. FB-13Beam—'V__-—-v- TJ-BBamfTM) 6.02 Serial Number 7002015808 / X 1O 2.0E PSrallaiTI® PSL User 2 7/27/Q3 8:0218 AM _ _ THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Ef ir Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1' Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Application Comment Adds To Type Uniform(ptf) Poir*(lbs) Parrt(tos) Poirrt(lbs) SUPPORTS: Class Fk»r(1.00) Ftoor(1 .00) Ftaor(1.00) Ftoor(1.00) Live 220.0 1815 4180 756 Dead 83.0 2754 5719 906 Location 0 Tele- s' 1CT 14' Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Live/Dead/Uplift/Total 1 StudwaH 3.50" 3.50" 4544/4944/0/9488 2 StudwaH 3.50" 4.07" 5727/6395/0/12122 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1114" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSL A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSL -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A3: Rim Board -Bearing length requirement exceeds input at support(s) 2. Supplemental hardware is required to satisfy bearing requirements. DESIGN CONTROLS: Shear (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) Live Load Defl (in) Total Load Defl (in) Maximum -12064 57902 Design -11508 57902 0.183 0.398 Control 24360 87330 0.392 Control Passed (47%) Passed (66%) Passed (U999+) 0.783 / Passed (L/472) Location Rt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading o -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:U480,TL:L/240). -Bracsn^Lu): AH compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 18" ofc unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not aH products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. •Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escomfido, CA 92029 Copyright © 2001 by Trus Joist, a Weyerhaeuser Business s a ragisCered trademark of Trus Joist. FB-13Beam-*\ ^v. TJ-BeamfTM) 6 02 Serial Number 70CE20lli«ja I X 1O 2.DE PS fall 3111© PSL THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1' Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Unifbrm(ptf) Point(lbs) Point(lbs) SUPPORTS: Class Fkx>r(1.00) FtoorO.OO) Ftoor(1.00) Floor(1.00) Live 220.0 1B15 4180 756 Dead 83.0 2754 5719 906 Location 0 Tele- s' Iff 14' Application Adds To Comment 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Live/Dead/Uplift/Total 3.50- 3.50" 4544/4944/0/9488 3.50" 4.07" 5727/6395/0/12122 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 11M" 1.3ETmberStrand® LSL A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 1.3E TimberStrand® LSL -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s): A3: Rim Board -Bearing length requirement exceeds input at supports) 2. Supplemental hardware is required to satisfy bearing requirements. DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Shear (Ibs) -12064 -115O8 Moment (Ft-Lbs) 57902 57902 Uve Load Defl (in) 0.183 Total Load Defl (in) 0.398 Control 24360 87330 0.392 Control Passed (47%) Passed (66%) Passed (U999+) 0.783 / Passed (L/472) Location Rt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LL:U480,TL:U240). -Braong^Luy. AJi compression edges (top ard bcttcm) must be braced at Z 8T ote unless Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not ati products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&A, Inc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondkto, CA 92029 Copyright © 2001 by Trus Joist, a Weyerhaeuser Business Parallam* is a registered trademark of Trua Joist. JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 EscondMo, CA. 92025 SHEET NO..OF. CALCUUTED BY, CHECKED BY SCALE. DATE. DATE. TUe: Dtgnr. Description: Scop*: Job* Date: General Timber'Beam Page 2 Description FB-15 Beam Stress Calcs 1 Bending Analysis Ck 22.210 Cv 0.908 Rb 6.276 Sxx 648.000 in3 Area 162.000 in2 Max Moment @ Center 93.14 k-ft @ Left Support 0.00 k-ft @ Right Support 0.00 k-ft Shear Analysis @ Left Support Design Shear 19.11 k Area Required 115.804 in2 Fv: Allowable 165.00 psi Bearing @ Supports Max. Left Reaction 14.61 k Max. Right Reaction 15.78 k Query Values M, V, & D @ Specified Locations @ Center Span Location = 0.00 ft @ Right Cant. Location =* 0.00 ft @ Left Cant Location = 0.00 ft Sxx Req'd 515.50 in3 0.00 in3 0.00 in3 @ Right Support 20.86k 126.442 In2 165.00 psi Bearing Length Req'd Bearing Length Req'd Moment 0.00 k-ft 0.00 k-ft 0.00 k-ft Allowable ffa 2,168.18 psi 2,178.45 psi 2,178.45 psi 5.622 in 6.073 in Shear Deflection 14.61 k 0.0000 in 0.00 k 0.0000 in 0.00 k 0.0000 in | TWt: Dagnr: DncripUon: Scope: Job* Date: General Timber Beam Page 1 Description FB-15 Beam General Informajjpfl-^ v Section Nam^ ' 6 79 Beam Width Beam Depth X24.0 } 6.750 in 24.000 in Member Type GluLam Bm Wt. Added to Loads Load Dur. Factor 1.000 Beam End Fixity Wood Density Pin-Pin 34.000 pcf Center Span Left Cantilever Right Cantilever Fb Base Allow Fv Allow Fc Allow E 21.00ft Lu ft Lu ft Lu 2,400.0 psi 165.0 psi 385.0 psi 1,800.0 ksi I 1.33 ft 0.00 ft 0.00 ft Uniform Loads Uniform Loads Center Over Full Span DL 351.00*/ft Left Cantilever DL */ft Right Cantilever DL #/ft LL LL LL 580.00 #/ft */#m ft/ft Point Loads | Dead Load Live Load ...distance 2.754.0 Ibs 1,815.0 Ibs 9.000ft 3,31 1.0 Ibs 2, 158.0 Ibs 14.000ft Ibs Ibs 0.000ft Ibs Ibs 0.000ft Ibs Ibs 0.000ft Ibs Ibs 0.000 ft 1 Summary | Span= 21 .DOR, Beam Width = Max Stress Ratio Maximum Moment Allowable Max. Positive Moment Max. Negative Moment Max @ Left Support Max @ Right Support Max. M allow fb 1,724.83 psi Fb 2, 168. 18 psi = 6.790m x Depth * 24.ln, End» are Pln-Pta 0.796 : 1 93.1 k-tt 117.1 k-ft Maximum Shear * 1 Allowable 93.14k-ft at 10.332ft O.OOk-ft at 21.000ft 0.00 k-ft 0.00 k-tt 117.08 fv 128.78 psi Fv 165.00 psi Reactions.. LeftDL Right DL Shear Camber: 6.76k 7.47k Beam Design OK 5 ©Left @ Right ©Lett @ Center @ Right Max Max 20.9 k 26.7k 14.61 k 15.78k 0.000 in 0.379 in ^ 0.000 in 14.61 k 15.78k | Deflections | Center Span... Deflection ...Location ...Length/Deft Dead Load -0.253 in 10.584ft 997.7 Total Load -0.520 in 10.584ft 484.91 S Left Cantilever... Deflection ...Length/Defl Right Cantilever... Deflection ...Length/Defl Dead Load 0.000 in 0.0 0.000 in 0.0 Total Load 0.000 in 0.0 0.000 in 0.0 TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondldo, CA. 92025 JOB.A-v. SHEET NO..11 CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. DATE. PBDOun »H-1 (SiAfli ShMB) »S-1 (PMM) £^§}m Uf. GrtW. Urn. 01471. To M« PHO« YOU FREE l-MWa-SMl :B-17Beam 3 4JO** tf ^ Jl" O ftC*^5orail am/Si DGI,..., if* A i*t £.uc raraiiaiiNy roi- THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Product Diagram is Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Width: 1* Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100 % duration, 0.0 Dead Verticd Loads; Type Class Live Dead Location Application Comment Poirt(lbs) Ftoor(1.00) 1815 2754 3-6" Uwform(pK> Ftoor(1.00) 42Q.G 302.0 OToT Adda To SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ifas) Width Length Uve/Dead/UpWUToUl 3.50" 3.50" 2378/2487/0/4865 3.50" 3.50" 2378 / 2487 / 0 / 4865 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 11M" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for deters): A3: Rim Board DESIGN CONTROLS: Shear Obs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) live Load Deft (in) Total Load Defl (in) Maximum 4742 11711 Design -3790 11711 0.036 0.078 Control 9473 27162 0.167 0.333 Control Passed (40%) Passed (43%) Passed (U99Q+) Passed (U999+) Location Rt end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Ftoor loading -Deflection Criteria: STANDARD(LLU480.TL:L/240). -8racing<Lu): All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2 8" ofe unless detafled otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus JotsttJJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software wil be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product appfcation, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS, -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: TH&AJftc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copyright * 2001 by TI\IB Joist, a Wsyaihoarser Buainaas Par all am* is a rsgiatsrad tcodamarlt of Trus Joist. FB-18 Beam T^B^mfrMjftozs^N^fa^TooOTSBOB 3 1/2" x 11 7/8" 2.0E Pa rail am® PSL Uur 2 7/77JO3 fi-44:35 AM THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED 11' Product Diagram i* Conceptual. LOADS: Analysis is for a Header (Flush Beam) Member. Tributary Load Whth:T Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf): 0.0 Live at 100% duration, 0.0 Dead Vertical Loads: Type Class Uve Dead Location Application Comment Point(lbs) Fbar(1.00) 1815 2754 31 Unttorm(p«) Roor(1.00) 220.6 147.0 OTolV AddsTo SUPPORTS: 1 Stud wait 2 StudwaH Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Uve/Dead/U pm/Tottl 3.50" 3.66" 2543/2902/0/5445 3.50" 3.50- 1692/1611/0/3303 Detail Other A3: Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® A3; Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" 0.8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for details): A3: Rrn Board -Bearing length requirement exceeds input at supports) 1. Supplemental hardware is required to satisfy bearing requirements. DESIGN CONTROLS: Maximum Design Control Control Shear (Ibs) 5382 4958 8035 Passed (62%) Moment (Ft-U») 13723 13723 19902 Passed (69%) Uve Load Defl (in) 0.141 0.267 Passed (U909) Total Load Defl (in) 0.296 0.533 Passed (L/432) Location Lt. end Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading -Deflection Criteria; STANDARD(LL:L/480,TLU240). -Bracing(Lu): Alt compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 2 8" ofc unless detailed otherwise. Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability. ADDITIONAL NOTES: -IMPORTANT! The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ). TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software wffl be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values. The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user. This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate. -Not all products are readily available. Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability. -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY! PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS. -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code NER analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above. PROJECT INFORMATION:OPERATOR INFORMATION: THSAInc. 125 West Mission Av. Suite 201 Escondido, CA 92029 Copyright & 2001 by Tr\is Joist, a Utyaihaeusai Business ParalladS is a registered trademark of Trus Joist. JOB.'t, TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE. TIL OF DATE. DATE. PBOCWT !W-I (S«9» StafU) BS-IC^We*! ^W?« 1*.. ^af^^m JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. DATE. JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondklo, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED 8Y_ CHECKED BY . SCALE. DATE. DATE. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 JOB.222- -SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY- CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. DATE. JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY. CHeCKED BY SCALE. OF__ DATE. DATE. WOOUa !M-l(Sirgli SMM| MS-1 (PMDM| (*>&£)* lit, Ginton, Mm. 01471. TaOcto PHONE KXl FRH l-tKh!IM3M JOB,239- TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondldo, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BV SCALE OF DATE. DATE. 03 TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 JOB. SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY, CHECKED BY SCALE. OF DATE. DATE. PBOOUCTBM-1 (Sing*SkNB| JDS-I (PMM| l*4&)*Inc..GramMt»Ol«1 .ToMwPHOMElOliFREE1-«»-i!S4MO JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Avc. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO..OF. CALCUUTED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED QY_ CHECKED BY SCALE. OF DATE. DATE. PflOOUCl W-1 (Stag*SkMttl MS-I (PukM) ^»?»Inc..Gram.him.91471 .ToMNPHONETOUfflEE ntt-OHMO SIMPSON Strong-Tie"* CONNECTORS Strong-Wall™ Shearwall Page 1 of 6 Strong-Wall just received ICBO CODE NO. PFC-5485! Simpson Strong-Tie introduces its latest innovation—the Simpson Strong-Wall. As with all Simpson products, the Strong-Wall was generated with input from people in the construction industry- engineers, architects, building officials, contractors and developers. They said they were looking for a cost-effective wall that would offer guaranteed quality, increased lateral resistance and easy installation features. Well, here it isl The Strong-Wall not only meets these requirements but also works in conjunction with the 1997 Uniform Building Code changes. FEATURE BENEFIT Wood Wall Continuous Top Plate 3 1/2 Inches Thick Pre-Attached Holdowns Slotted Holes for Perpendicular Adjustments Factory Built, Fingerprinted, High Quality Materials Allows for Greater Than 2-to-1 Aspect Ratio Template available for Placement of Anchor Bolts Design Load Values Derived from Cyclic Testing of Complete Wall System Higher loads than conventional field built shearwalls Higher R value than steel wall. Achieves higher drag strut capacity. No diaphragm sticking out of the plane of the wall; no furring out adjacent walls—saves on installation costs. Assures high quality control, saves installation time. Field adjustability results in fewer problems associated with misplaced anchor bolts. Consistent quality and performance. Can use less expensive wood wall, steel-type is labor-intensive. Anchor bolts less likely to be off layout. Saves time for concrete and framing contractor. Higher degree of confidence in building performance for owner, engineer and insurance company. Requires 30-70% less lineal footage than conventional shearwall. Eliminating excess shear panels can reduce water entrapment problems associated with some stucco installation methods. Standard Strong-Wall Patent Pending STANDARD STRONG-WALL Naming Scheme: SW24x8-4 Strong-Wall -J | L Width I (In-) Nominal Wall Thickness Nominal (ln') Height (ft-) Model SW24x8-4 SW32x8-4 SW48X8-4 SW24x9-4 SW32x9-4 SW48x9-4 'SW32X10-4 SW48x10-4 W (in) 24 32 48 24 32 48 32 48 H (in) 93,n 93.v; 93 \ 105'; 105^. 105V, 117,/4 117", T (in) 3,v; 3# 3>; 3/? 37, 3/2 3r; 3.S Number of Fasteners in Top of Wall 12-SDS#c6 16-SDS^x6 24-SDS,y«x6 12-SDS/.X6 16-SDSXX6 24-SDS)ix6 16-SDSxx6 24-SDSr,x6 Number of MudsillAnchors 2-H 2-H 3-H 2-H 2-H 3-H 2-H 3-H Hoi down Reaction at Strength Limit State (Ibs.) 16470 20670 19920 21540 21510 20520 19530 21270 Ho (down Reaction at Allowable Shear (Ibs.) 3070 7100 5900 3560 4960 6190 4670 6680 Ho I down! Anchor Bolts 2-SSTB28 2-SSTB28 2-SSTB28 2-SSTB28 2-SSTB28 2-SSTB28 2-SSTB28 2-SSTB28 Allowable Shear V Load (Ib) 1610 2875 4545 1585 2600 4370 £"24"$D 4095 Drift al Allowable Shear V (in) .389 .545 .380 .396 .427 .439 .453 .435 Allowable Shear V Load (Ib/ft) 804 1078 1136 793 975 1093 923 1024 Max. Wall Weight (Ibs) 91 116 149 101 128 165 134 171 1 For plywood shear panel, add "P" lo model name (e.0. SW24x8-4P), and multiply the table loads by 0.88. 2. For two-pour applications, use the SSTB34, The building designer shall verify that these details are consistent with the complete load path requirements of the structure. National Toll Free Number: 1-800-999-5099 Web Site: www.strongtie.com © Copyright 1999 Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc. Form F-STRONGWALL4 6/99 exp 6/00 JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO.. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE. OF DATE. DATE. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 -rfffl^HB JOB. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escbndido, CA. 92025 r9. fry. SHEET NO..OF. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. PfiOOUCT 204-1 jSingk SMfttl »S-1 (PiMM) ^W?. (*.. GMon, Met 01471. Te MX PHONE ML fME l-»0-!!S«aO JOB. ., SHEET NO..L-fl Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. DATE, -11-03 ^ewe^<iTyi'XAfKf JOS. TH&A, INC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 SHEET NO..U/n OF. CALCULATED BY. CHECKED BY SCALE. DATE. DATE. PRODUCT 204-i (Singli StWIS] iOS-UPMOM) ^«?«!«.. Grata. Uut 01471. To (MM PHONE TOIL FREE I-MO-KMUO SHEAR WALL SCHEDULE SYM MATERIAL 1/2" Gyp Bd Unblocked 5/8" Gyp Bd Unblocked 1/2" Gyp Bd Unblocked 5/8* Gyp Bd Unblocked 7/8" Stucco w/ NAILING 5d Cooler Nails @ 7" OC F.N. & EN. 6d Cooler Nails @ T OC F.N. & E.N. 5d Cooler Nails @ 4" OC F.N. & EN. 6d Cooler Nails @ 4' OC F.N. & E.N. 16 GA Staples 6" OC SHEAR VALUE 50#/FT 50#/FT 75#/FT 75#/FT 180#/FT TRANSFER NAILING 16d @ 12" OC or A35 @ 32" OC 16d @ 12" OC or A35 @ 32" OC 16d @ 8" OC or A35 @ 32" OC 16d @ 8" OC or A35 @ 32" OC 16d @ 8" OC or ANCHOR BOLTS 5/8'xlO" @ 5/8"xlO" @ 5/8"xIO" @ 5/8"xlO" @ 5/8"xlO" @ Paper Backed Top & Bottom Plates, Edges Wire Lath & Field of Shear Panel 3/8" Struct II C-D or C-C Plywood 8d @ 6" OC EN. & B.N. 12" OC F.N. 260#/FT 3/8" Struct II 8d @ 4" OC EN. & B.N. C-D or C-C 12" OC F.N. (3) Plywood 3/8" Struct II C-D or C-C Plywood 3/8" Struct II CD or C-C Plywood 1/2" Struct II C-D or C-C Plywood 1/2" Struct 1 C-D or C-C Plywood 8d @ 3" OC EN. & B.N. 12" OCF.N. (3) 8d @ 2" OC EN. & B.N. 12" OC F.N. (2) (3) lOd @ 3" OC E.N. & B.N. 12" OC F.N. (2) (3) lOd @ 2" OC EN. & B.N. 12" OCF.N. (2) (3) 490#/FT 640#/FT 600#/FT 770#/FT A35 @ 32" OC 16d @ 6" OC or A35 @ 24" OC 16d @ 4" OC or A35 @ 16" OC 16d @ .V OC or A35 @ 12" OC 16d @ 2" OC or A35 @ 9" OC 16d @ 3" OC or A35 @ 12" OC 16d @ 2" OC or A35 @ 8" OC 48' OC (1 5/8"xlO" @ 24' OC (1) 5/8"xlET @ 24"OC (1) 5/8"xlO" @ 16" OC (1) 5/8"xlO" @ 12' OC (1) 5/8"xlO" @ 12' OC (1) 5/8"xlOB @ 8' OC (1) NOTE: (1) Spacing of anchor bolts and shear transfer nailing shall be reduced by half if shear wall materials are required on both faces of wall. (2) Framing at adjoining panel edges shall be 3-inch nomimal or wider and nails staggered (3) Where plywood is on both sides of wall, framing member for panel joints shall be 3-inch nomima! or wider and nail on each side is staggered EDGE NAIL (E.N.) 16d NAJLS SPACED PER SCHEDULE B.N 16d NAILS PER SCHEDULE SHEATHING 2x RIM JST. OR BLX'C. E.N. D6L TOP PLATE A35 FRAMING ANCHOR SPACED PER SCHEDULE SHEAR TRANSFER W/ 2x4 BLOCKING SHEAR TRANSFER W/ METAL CUPS TABLE 23-II-B-1 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE TABLE 23-II-B-1—NAILING SCHEDULE CONNECTION 1. Joist to sill or girder, toenail 2. Bridging lo joist, loenail each end 3. 1" x 6" (25 mm x 152 mm) subfloor or less lo each joist, face nail 4. Wider than 1" x 6" (25 mm x 152 mm) subfloor to each joist, face nail 5. 2" (51 mm) subfloor lo joist or girder, blind and face nail 6. Sole plale to joist or blocking, typical face nail Sole plale lo joist or blocking, al braced wall panels 7. Top plate lo stud, end nail 8. Stud to sole plate 9. Double studs, face nail '"* 10. Doubled top plates, lypical face nail Double lop plates, lap splice 11. Blocking between joists or rafters lo lop plate, loenail 12. Rim joisl to top plate, loenail 13. Tbp plates, laps and intersections, face nail 14. Continuous header, two pieces ' 15. Ceiling joists to plale, (ucnnil 16. Continuous header lo stud, toenail 17. Ceiling joisls, laps over partitions, face nail 18. Ceiling Joisls lo parallel rafters, face nail 19. Rafter to plate, loenail 20. 1* (25 mm) brace lo each stud and plate, face nail 21. 1* x 8" (25 mm x 203 mm) sheathing or less lo each bearing, face nail 22. Wider than 1° x 8" (25 mm x 203 mm) sheathing lo each bearing, face nail 23. Built-up corner studs 24. Built-up girder and beams 20d H( 32" (813 mm) o.c. 25. 2" (51 mm)plnnks 26. Wood structural panels and particlcbonrd:2 Subfluur und wull .sliciithlng (to framing): Vi" (12.7 mm) and less 7/n"-l" (22 mm-25 mm) Combination subfloor-underlaymcnl (lo framing): 3/4"(19 mm) and less 7/8"-l" (22 mm-25 mm) ll/8"-l'/4l'(20mm-32mm) 27. Panel siding (lo framing)2: '/i" (12.7 mm) or less s/g"(l6mm) 28. Fiberboard sheathing:7 '/2" (12.7 mm) 25/32" (20 mm) ..' NAIUNQ' 3-Sd 2-gd 2-8d 3-8d 2-16d 16d at 16" (406 mm) o.c. 3-16dpcrl6"(406mm) 2-16d 4-8d, loenail or 2-16d, end nail 16dai24" (GIU mm) o.c. 16d at 16" (406 mm) o.c. 8-1 6d 3-8d 8d at 6" (152 mm) o.c. 2-16d 16d at 16" (406 mm) o.c. along each edge 3-Rd 4-8d 3-16d 3-l6d 3-8d 2-8d 2-8d 3-8d 16d at 24" (610 mm) o.c. at lop and bottom and staggered 2-2Ud nt ends mid al each splice 2-l6d at each bearing 6d3 8d4 or fid3 8d-1 10d4 or 8d3 6ds 8ds I0d4or8d5 fid6 8d6 No. llga.8 6d4 No. I6ga.' No. llga.8 8d4 No. I6ga.u 29. Interior paneling '/4M (6.4 mm) 4jlO 3/fl" (9.5 mm) gjii 'Common or box nails may be used except where otherwise slated.2Nails spaced al 6 inches (152 mm) on center al edges, 12 inches (305 mm) al intermediate supports except 6 inches (152 mm) at all supports where spans are 48 inches (1219 mm) or more. For nailing of wood structural panel and particlcboard diaphragms and shear walls, refer lo Sections 2315.3.3 and 2315.4. Nails for wall sheathing may be common, box or casing,3Common or deformed shank. 'Common.5Deformed shank. 'Corrosion-resistant siding or casing nails conforming lo the requirements of Section 2304.3. ^Fasteners spaced 3 inches (76 mm) on center at exlenor edges and 6 inches (152 mm) on center at intermediate supports. "Corrosion-resistant roofing nails with 7/i6-inch-diameter (11 mm) head and W2-inch (38 mm) length for Vz-mch (12.7 mm) sheathing and !3/4-inch (44 mm ) length for "fo-inch (20 mm) sheathing conforming lo the requirements of Section 2304.3.9Corrosion-resistanl staples with nominal '/je-inch fll mm) crown and I'/s-inch (29 mm) length for '/2-inch (12.7 mm) sheathing and l'/2-inch (38 mm) length for "/32-inch (20 mm) sheathing conforming to the requirements of Section 2304.3. 10Panel supports at 16 inches (406 mm) [20 inches (508 mm) if strength axis in Ihe long direction of the panel, unless otherwise marked]. Casing or finish nails spaced 6 inches (152 mm) on panel edges, 12 inches (305 mm) at inlermediate supports. "Panel supports al 24 inches (610 mm). Casing or finish nails spaced 6 inches (152 mm) on panel edges, 12 inches (305 mm) at intermediale supports. 2-282 TH&A, INC.0* Engineering and Code Consultants jr- |j> 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 CAUUUTM.Y W3 O*TI Escondido, CA. 92025 c*C«» •» »*T' TeL: (760) 746-5112, Fax: (760) 741-0480 T.... SPECIFICATIONS/NOTESI GENERAL! 1 ALL DETAILS. SECTIONS AND NOTES SHOWN ON STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED TO BE TYPICAL AND SHALL APPLY TO SIMILAR SITUATIONS ELSEWHERE U.N.O. 2 ALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WtTH THE LATEST ADOPTED EDITION OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. 3 ALL OMISSIONS OR CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE VARIOUS ELEMENTS OF THE WORKING DRAWINGS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT AND THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING'WITH ANY WORK INVOLVED. 4 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SHORING AND BRACING TO SUPPORT ALL LOADS DURING CONSTRUCTION. 3 DURING CONSTRUCTION AND PRIOR TO THE INCORPORATION (JFi ALL CHAN- GESi REVISIONS* MODIFICATIONS AND/OR DEVIATIONS FROM THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OFi AND OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE ARCHITECTi STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND THE GOVERNING BUILDING DEPARTMENT. • LUMBER/FRAMING I * 1 ALL 2X HORIZONTAL RF/CLG LUMBER TO BE KIN DF«2 U.N.O. 2 ALL 2X HORIZONTAL FUR LUMBER TO BE KIN DF»1 U.N.O. 3 ALL 4X 6 LARGER HORIZONTAL LUMBER TO BE MIN DF ttl U.N.O. 4 ALL GLULAMS TO BE DF/DF COMB 24F-V4 DRY USE U.N.O. 3 ALL 2X VERTICAL LUMBER TO BE MIN DF tt2 U.N.O. 6 ALL 4X L LARGER VERTICAL LUMBER TO BE MIN DFN1 U.N.O. 7 ALL PLYWD TO BE MIN CD-CC STRUCT IX OR CDX. 8 TYPICAL NAILING SCHEDULE AS PER UBC 23-P. ' 9 BUILT-UP BEAMS! DEL 2X METIERS TO BE FACE NAILED W/ MIN 16d d I2ift OC STAGGERED TOP/EOT. 3 OR MORE 2X LAMINATIONS TO BE CONN W/ l/2in DIA MB & WASHER MIN S 2Mn OC STAGGERED TOP/EOT «• 2 EA END 10 CARRY .ALL POSTS 6 DBL STUDS DOWN TO FOUNDATIONS. BLOCK SOLID AS RE'i'D FOR FULL BR6 9 FLR LINES. • CONCRETES ! PROVIDE MINIMUM BAR COVERAGE OF 3in FOR CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH.OR MINIMUM 2in FOR ALL FORMED CONCRETE. 2 £2-S.RETE AS PER AS™ C"ISB (AGGREGATES PER ASTM C-33)t TYPICAL PORTLAND CEMENT TYPE^T USE GRADE 'C' MIX I *2-l/2t3-l/2 W/ MAX 7-1/2 GAL WATER PER SACK OF CEMENT. • TH&A,iNC. Engineering and Code Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 Tel.: (760) 746-5112, Fax: (760) 741-0480 tHCET NO OF. ir. CMCCKCD tt •e*n. OATf. CONCRETE:* ALL CONCRETE TO REACH MIN ULT COMPRESSIVE STRESS OF 2*00 PSI 3 2B DAYS U.N.O. MASONRY: . 1 CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS TO BE NORMAL WEIGHT HOLLOW LOAD BEARINGTYPE CONFORMING TO ASTM C-90. MASONRY UNITS SHALL BE CLEAN ANDFREE OF ALL SUBSTANCE THAT MIGHT IMPAIR BOND AND SHALL BE STOREDUNDER COVER ON THE JOB.2 ALL CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS TO BE GRADE N-II U.N.O.3 MIN COHPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF ALL MASONRY UNITS SHALL BE 1500 PSI.4 TYPICAL TYPE 'M' MORTAR: 1 PART CEMENTt 3-1/2 PARTS SANDiI/A PART LIME PUTTYi CONFORM W/ ASTM C-270. WATER CONTENTSHALL BE MIN REfc'D FOR WORKING CONSISTENCY. MIN 2000 PSI.5 GROUT MIX SHALL BE 1 PART CEMENTi 3 PARTS SAND AND (OPTIONAL)1/10 PART LIME PUTTY. ADD UP TO 2 PARTS PEA GRAVEL WHERE SPACESEXCEED 2in MIN. 28 DAY ULT STRENGTH OF GROUT SHALL BE 2000 PSI.* USE SUFFICIENT WATER TO PRODUCE POURING CONSISTENCE W/0 SEGREGATION REINF STL: 1 ALL REINF STL TO BE MIN ASTM-A613 GRADE 40 U.N.O. 2 HELPED WIRE HS3M» ASTM-*l£54^SfiUni4U~&aA3ElttB/gIB LAP ALL MESH MIN 2 MODULES. ALL REINF BARS SHALL BE ACCURATELY 6 SECURELY PLACED BEFORE POURING CONC OR APPLYING MORTAR OR GROUT. I2 3 4 3 4 3 STRUCT STL I ALL STEEL TO CONFORM TO ASTM-A36 U.N.O. DETAILING & FABRICATION PER AISC - LATEST EDITION. ALL STEEL PIPES TO CONFORM TO ASTM A33 GRADE B U.N.O. FASTENERS: ALL CONNECTORS NOTED TO BE SIMPSON OR EQUIVALENT,ALL BOLTS TO BE MJN ASTM-A307. • BOLT HOLES: MAX l/16in LARGER 'THAN BOLT DIA.,ALL BOLTS BRG ON WOOD TO USE M.I. WASHER UNDER HEAD & NUT.LAG BOLTS: LEAD HOLES FOR SHANK TO BE SAME AS SHANK; THREADEDPORTION TO BE 60-70% OF SHANK DIA.ALL NAILS TO BE COMMON U.N.O. TH&A,iNC. Engineering and Code'Consultants 125 West Mission Ave. Suite 201 Escondido, CA. 92025 Tel.: (760) 746-5112, Fax: (760) 741-0480 ,*MtET NO. CALCULATED §r. CHECKED IV DATE. DATE. FASTENERS: USE FULL NAILING/BOLTING S ALL CONNECTORS U.N.O.* ^* FOUNDATIONS: PROVIDE MIN CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL FOUNDATIONS U.N.O. ALL CONT/ISOLATED FTG5 TO BE PLACED MIN in INTO COMPETENT BRG SOIL OR BEDROCK.ACQUISITION OF A SOILS REPORT is RECOMMENDED FOR ALL JOBS. IF NO SOILS REPORT IS AVAlLABLEi ASSUM'D SOIL TYPE & BRG VALUE USED IN CALCULATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO BUILDING DEPT APPROVAL. ENGR WILL NOT BE H^LD RESPONSIBLE FOR BLDG DEPT APPROVED VALUE! SEE FOUNDATION PLAN FOR ALLOWABLE SOIL BRG PRESSURE. RETAINING WALLS: i CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS & CONDITIONS ON THE JOB.2' RESPONSIBILITY FOR ACCURATELY DESCRIBING THE SITE CONDITIONSRESTS ON THE CLIENT. REVIEW CALCULATIONS IMMEDIATELY TO DETERMINEWHETHER CONSIDERATION WAS QIVEN IN WALL DESIGN FOR ADJACENT FTGiVEHICLE OR BACKSLOPS SURCHARGES. CONTACT THIS OFFICE IMMEDIATELYIF THERE IS ANY QUESTION REGARDING THIS MATTER.3 IF NO SOILS REPORT IS AVAlLABLEi ASSUM'D SOIL TYPE t BRG VALUEUSED IN CALCULATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO BUILDING DEPT APPROVAL.4 VERIFY INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS W/ BLDG DEPT PRIOR TO CONSTR.5 S££ RETAINING WALL SCHEDULE FOR BLOCK INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS.6 ALL RETAINING WALL FTGS TO EXTEND MIN 12in INTO COMPETENT BRGSOIL AS DEFINED BY SOILS REPORT OR APPROVED STANDARD PRACTICE.RECOMMENDATIONS OF SOILS REPORT TO SUPERCEDE THIS MIN REQUIREMENT7 BOTTOM OF PAD TO BE MIN 5' FROM DAYLIGHTi MEASURED IN A HORIZDIRECTION FROM THE NEAREST BOTTOM EDGE OF PAD. 8 PROVIDE EITHER A MIN I2in x 12in GRAVEL POCKET 9 BASE OF WLWITH 4in DIA PVC PERFORATED DRAIN PIPE TO DAYLIGHTi OR MIN 2 SQIN WEE? HOLES 3 BASS OF WALL STEM TO ADJACENT GRADE 3 48in OC.9 BACKFILLING SHALL NOT BE STARTED FOR AT LEAST2I DAYS AFTERTHE FILLING OF THE CELLS WITH GROUT.10 DO NOT BACKFILL UNTIL ALL WORK HAS PASSED REft'D INSPECTIONS.BACKFILLING MUST BE THOROUGHLY TAMPED TO PREVENT FURTHER SETTLING.11 IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALLSHORING DURING CONSTRUCTION AS REQ'D.12 ALL BACKFILL MATERIALS TO BE GRANULAR* i.*. SANDi GRAVELi ORSOIL APPROVED BY PROJECT SOILS ENGINEER. NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. November 25,2003 Project No. CE-6481 James Vine 241 Date Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: Letter of Conformance Proposed Single Family Dwelling 237 Date Avenue Carlsbad, California Reference: "Report of Certification of Compacted Fill Ground" prepared by North County Compaction Engineering, Inc. dated November 11, 2003 Dear Mr. Vine: In response to your request, we have reviewed our previously submitted report dated November 11,2003 and performed an inspection of the site for adherence to the recommendations set forth. Our site inspection of November 24,2003 revealed foundation excavations and reinforcement placement was performed in accordance with the recommendations set forth. Recommendations are considered minimal and any in excess of our report should be further inspected by the engineer of work and/or local building authority for their conformance. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams Dale R. Regli President Registered Geotechnical Engineer 0(50713 RKA:paj cc: (4) submitted P. O. BOX302002 * ESCONDJDO, CA 92030 * (760)480-1116 FAX(760)741-6568 NORTH COUMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. August 19, 2003 Project No. CE-6481 James Vine 280 Chinquapin Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: City of Carlsbad Plan Check Response Letter Proposed Single Family Dwelling 237 Date Avenue Carlsbad, California Reference: 1.) "Preliminary Soils Investigation" prepared by Compaction Labs, Inc. dated August 21,1991 2.) "Update Letter" prepared by North County Compaction Engineering, Inc. dated September 25,2001 3.) Grading/Site Plan prepared by Buccola Engineering, Inc. dated September 12,2001 4.) Foundation Plan prepared by TH& A, Inc. dated April 26, 2003 Dear Mr. Vine: Per the City of Carlsbad, we are responding herein to the following plan check corrections: 1. Near Source Factor (Seismic Zone 4) The criteria for the near source factor is presented in Referenced Report No. 2. The parameters for calculating the near source factor is as follows: A.) Soil Profile = SD (Table 16-J of the 1997 Uniform Building Code) B.) Type *B' Fault (Rose Canyon) C.) Distance = 7 km (California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology [maps], in conjunction with Tables 16-S and 16-T of the 1997 Uniform Building Code) 2. Grading and Foundation Plan Review We have reviewed the above referenced grading plan and foundation plan and found them to be in substantial conformance with Referenced Reports No. 1 and 2. P.O. BOX302002 * ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 * (760)480-1116 FAX(760) 741-6568 MORTH COCIMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, IMC. Project No. CE-6481 Page 2 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President Dale R. Regli Registered Civil E7 Geotechnical Engineer RKA:paj cc: (4) submitted NORTH COCIOTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. September 25,2001 Project No. CE-6481 James Vine 280 Chinquapin Ave. #A Carlsbad, Ca 92008 Subject: Update Letter , , ^ " •*; >r Two Proposed Single Family Dwellings •V 237 and 241 Date Avenue ;. Carlsbad, California References: 1.) "Preliminary Soils Investigation" prepared by Compaction Labs, Inc., • dated August 21,1991 :;; - v ^ { ' 2.) Site Plans prepared byBuccola Engineering, Inc., dated September 12,2001 :;^>7%/vvDearMr. Vine:".' ,. '.; |B;|K Per your request, we have inspected the subject building sites and reviewed the above reference | . ?tf. • plans and soils reports for the purpose of providing updated recommendations with regard to the vi'^? ? newly planned single family dwellings. ; i ; • " V* S fL ^ is our understanding, the proposed dwellings will consist of two story, wood frame • ; ---•^•; ^3 '•',.construction, utilizing slab on grade foundations. Furthermore, shallow retaining walls will be ^ i f i- C constructed along the east, west and mid-property lines, v - TfO.T fJ Updated Recommendations and Conclusions': ; 'S - ' ~~ - ••• '••« !^-- ^*v-'1'"^; ^'•'••V ''^s;i^r;--." ''J^1 1.) The subject sites and soil conditions remain as presented in Referenced ReportNo. 1. 2.) All grading recommendations in Referenced Report No. 1 should be incorporated into the proposed site development. 3.) Groundwater related problems at the site are not apparent Therefore, due to the dense nature of the underlying sandstone formation at the site, it is our opinion soil liquefaction is unlikely to occur if grading is performed in accordance with Reference Report No. 1. NORTH coormr COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC Project No. CE-6481 Page 2 4.) Updated Foundation Recommendations For One-Story Construction: ' Continuous footing having a minimum width of 12 inches and founded a minimum ' V .: T ;..'"• depth of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade will have an allowable soil bearing "£ ; V 0{ . pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot;^ ; .:. '-'. '' •'•;'•"•'^ • '•''-'• •*"•'••/>; 1;fAf:'-^*v1-^^s.','-:^l'-^ , ;''".';-:- ' " -••'."- '••'•' ••••?! '\ ' •:• "• '- ' ' • "' "-"" •'*-"-*><• *&."''*£ v^'Vri "4 f i ,; &••&% '%''•"*=• £ • •• v- ;••-•, ,';;''-'-.V "'-.- -., - . -. •-: • '$''£,' For Two-Story Construction:;: . • .^V'^^rSVM^V :•/•"•••'•' '- ..•• • ' •'• ."''^•l(- • v ''• '."i,'-:.r > -' .fr:-t. •--.>;i=;-.A' ii".,^i.';-.&•-•• -•• -:-•'••. -!--•-,,,4:.'^~ ;3'. '"• •''.'"•.• y- ' -•' ' ' ' -'---:-.'.;.. •%.;'- •-;••',' .;r,-{''5 O^£^/v,r^. • • -h . '-"' ^';7/'i;;. £-V--: **?*•'? ' ' •' .-' .' .'••< i Continuous footings should have a minimum width of 15 inches and be founded . - aminimumdepthof 18 inches belowlowest adjacent grade. „ ^;-: ', - ; .. - , • - Isolated square footings having a di^eteirpifiS inches and founded a minimum depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade will have an allowable soil bearing y><^9^All continuous footings are to be ^ reinforced wi&pne^ bar top and bottom Steel should be positioned 3 inches above bottom of footing and 3 inches below Interior slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches thick and reinforced with #3 bars '';•-' on 18 inch centers, both ways at mid-point of slab thickness. i: .V . ; f-V! Slab underlayment should consist of 4 inches of washed concrete sand with ;<> • a visqueen moisture barrier installed at mid-point of sand (2 inches sand, visqueen, -' a \ ,.tft &^ 2 inches sand). Sand should be tested in accordance with ASTM D-2419 to ins "••-•] ,^'vj,rivh- ' ..-..'., ....-,..'*i\'*#$&; a mmimujn sand equivalent of 30.^ vv,,;^^; .'.-;' . . • . ' "Fr •• **-'- '"" f \ W» 'A. * •-;^vp , 5.) Retami ^SS ''.'•>•.... For static conditions, the prevailing soils will have an allowable equivalent passive fluid «; > • '.£••' - pressure of 342 psf, increasing 342 psf per foot in depth. Allowable pressures assume walls are - K ' backfilled with a non-expansive sand a distance behind the wall equivalent to two-thirds the /,!'!?;* ^>r"reteu^^ •" . •^V^f,^V>^''%:':''v; "; .-•-• '•-''' ; -..-,' ^: ': ^'"^'":'••: 5)^11 Allovrable active pressures may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing^ *' 38 pcf for unrestrained walls. These values assume a vertical, smooth wall, and a level, drained; V |; backfill Should these conditions not be met, we should be contacted for new values. '»•&• '*&$'f*EL J.^'. 1 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC.ProjectNo. CE-6481 ,Allowable active pressures for restrained walls may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 38 pcf, plus ah additional uniform lateral pressure of 8R H=height of retained soils above top of wall footing in vertical feet Allowable active pressures iTor retaning walls with 2:1 inclinations 'T>":?'-" ' •' jV t. • ' *"- •«'• V"*^!?^**1"'-^"**^^^11^^"!' j?!"t;il: • i.1 « " > 'assumed to be equivalent to a pressure of fluid weighing 55 pcf. of sloping surcharge may be ' i The coefficient of friction of concrete to sou may be assumed to be .38 for resistance to '•'•' ' --••"'" ' «'-•'•'•••'*•": i^^*Wii*Sil!fca^A?*'i^ -. ' ,horizontal movement^ iftr.S IP-'1 ^Jw::;r • ,*'K&-&:':- '•" * '••-•IM'-yW,•••-•,.->; .- -'K:f^v<J~ !l. . . •' ' . ""'CV '•• ' "•'-'^y^'-"'•'.?;;<"' '•- '^'•'••*'$!f™&fy?ipjWFf-^*--*^ ?- - **'*Vt >», ?•), S®1?11110 ^^'gn VPPl'S^fiPMX^yJ^^1?1^118), '^^'!w w^^-x '^y^ir ^^S^^i^^01^^fe?^ %ffiS C.) Distance *;T^&7^ifofma]^™rtment of Conservation, Division "' :15>r :2 '-' f >%I*^'W'^>Vi .''- /.-k ,*^*"i''X*^^r'*^*™L-^«^^4i^'^--iM^W'aitt^ ' . "'- • :"'' • t m t t « *- ft ' • 1 f rv*' £>'~ •'"'If 1 • r^M^Kfq; s of Mines and Geology [maps]; in conjunction with Tables 16-S and lo-T of * ^ the 1997lp^BSffl5%«!1^1*'-*'™'^ ' • '• •--' :i^s tw,.tthp,,r- *,, rtI»|H^ Tne above updated recommendations should be incorporated into the Preliminary Souls report *' by Comj^^bn I^fist l^^fere ie 1997 Uniform Building Code) .' *hlW?^tJ f^.'jl h -- '.' I. ,- .v *^ . , •%v*V *>->: ' T- v •ji-j*-i-^ j . Jt. • * j • * *t. i - •Compaction Labs, Inc. should be considered valid to date and be incorporated into the planning,'J^'^^^ '• '' ' ' 'in ana construction ^ou nave any questions, please•'. t^ ,.r ..'-••• -i, - •' *-'- • • '-'•'•'•• ••* i •'- - •• *-L - - .'.'..•sg& v«.-|.wf' is sincerely • 'K.'^^L'Jt ^ ,, . rf esnate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service' COMPACTION ENGINEERING,:, - . . . > .- . ^ ^ . < * «^ Dale R. Re Registered Ci Geotechnical Engineer COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION for TWO PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS 237 Date Avenue Carlsbad, California Prepared for VINEDALE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 280-A Chinquapin Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 August 21, 1991 Project No. CL-4156 COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES August 21. 1991 Project CL-4156 Vinedale Development Corporation 280-A Chinquapin Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: Two Proposed Single Family Dwellings 237 Date Avenue Carlsbad, California Dear Ms. Vine: Per your request, we have performed a preliminary soils investi- gation for the subject project. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the suitability of the site for the proposed development and make recommendations with regard to site grading and foundation design. Briefly, the investigation reveals favorable soil conditions and in our opinion the site is suitable for the proposed development, pro- vided recommendations set forth in the attached report are adhered to. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is Respectfully submitted, COMPACTION LABS, INC. Ronald K. Adams President Regi^ej&^^YAJ^i&^er 19393 000713 RKA:ras cc: (3) Submitted (2) Filed Post Office Box 301338, Escondido, CA 92030 • (643) 741-5289 COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Purpose and Scope 1 2. Location and Description of Site 1 3. Field Investigation 1 4. Soils Conditions 2 5. Laboratory Testing 2 6. Recommendations and Conclusions 2 A. Grading B. Foundations C. Estimated Paving Section D. Grading Plan Review 7. Uncertainty and Limitations APPENDIX Appendix A: Exploration Legend & Unified Soil Classification Chart Plate No. One Boring Location Plan Plate Nos. Two & Three Exploration Log Plate No. Four Tabulation of Test Results Appendix B: Recommended Grading Specifications COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES August 21, 1991 Project CL-4156 Page 1 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of the investigation was to determine if the site is suitable for the two proposed single family dwellings. The scope of the investigation was to: A. Determine the physical properties and engineering characterisitics of the surface and subsurface soils. B. Provide design information with regard to grading, site preparation and foundation design of the pro^ posed structure(s). 2. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SITE The site is located at 237 Date Avenue in the City of Carlsbad, California. The two adjoining rectangular shaped lots cover 142' of frontage along Date Avenue and are approximately 113' deep. The properties are bordered by single family dwellings to the east, west and south, and Date Avenue to the north. Site topography consists of predominantly flat lots pitched down- ward to the north. The lots are presently occupied by a single story dwelling, detached garage and storage sheds. The house is generally landscaped with shrubs and small trees. Lawns and/or grasses are nonexistant. An abandoned underground septic tank is present at the southwest corner of the west lot. The approximate location of the tank is delineated on the attached Plate No. One entitled, "Test Pit Location Plan". 3. FIELD INVESTIGATION The field investigation was performed on August 13, 1991 and included an inspection of the site and the excavation of two exploratory trenches, with a backhoe to depths of eight feet. Location of test pits are shown on the attached Plate No. One, entitled "Test Pit Location Plan". COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES August 21, 1991 Project CL-4156 Page 2 As excavation proceeded, representative bulk samples were collected. In place natural densities and moisture contents were determined at different depths in the excavations and are included on Plate Kos. Two and Three. Subsequent to obtaining soil samples, our exploratory excavations were backfilled. 4. SOIL CONDITIONS Loose surficial soils (silty-sands) consisting of plowed ground were found to be 1.5' and 2' in depth in Test Pit Nos. 1 and 2, respectively. Underlying native soils to depths explored were medium dense to dense silty-sands of the coastal terrace deposit. Expansive soils were not observed. Therefore, no special consider- ation need be given this characteristic. Groundwater was not encountered at the time of our investigation, nor did caving of exploratory trenches occur. 5. LABORATORY SOIL TESTING All laboratory tests were performed on typical soils in accordance with accepted test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Tests conducted include: A) Optimum Moisture & Maximum Density B) Direct Shear (Remold) C) Sieve Analysis D) Field Density & Moisture E) Expansion Potential (Conducted in accordance with requirements of the City of San Diego Test for Expansive Soils.) Test results are tabulated on the attached Plate Nos. Two-Four, entitled "Exploration Log & Tabulation of Test Results". 6. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS General It is our understanding, wood frame construction with slab on grade foundations are planned. COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES August 21, 1991 Project No. CL-4156 Page 3 In our opinion, the site is suitable for the proposed single family dwellings. Recommendations contained in this report should be incorporated in the planning, design and construction phase of the subject project. 6A. Grading General Grading at the site will be performed to remove and recompact loose surficial topsoils and to create level building areas to accommo- date slab on grade construction. All grading should be performed in accordance with the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance and the Recommendations/Specifications presented in this report. Subsequent to site demolition, loose surficial top soils (plowed ground), as indicated on the attached Plate Nos. Two and Three, should be undercut or removed to firm native ground and recom- pacted in accordance with the attached Appendix 'B' entitled, "Recommended Grading Specifications". Firm native ground may be determined as undisturbed soil having an insitu density of greater than 90% of maximum dry density. We should be contacted to document firm native ground is exposed and properly prepared prior to filling. The removal area should extend under and a minimum of 5' beyond all proposed structures, pools and surface improvements. All fill soils generated from earthwork construction should be placed in conformance with the attached Appendix 'B' entitled, "Recommended Grading Specifications". The existing septic tank should be over excavated and hauled off site. The excavation backfill soils should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of maximum dry density. Particles of asphalt and concrete debris, having a diameter of greater than 6" will not be suitable fill material and should be separated from fines during grading and hauled off site. If encountered, leach lines and/or pipes should be removed. Concrete pipes may be crushed in place. Trench lines should be re- compacted in accordance with Appendix 'B'. Due to relatively shallow removals of loose surficial soils, it is highly probable the foundation bearing zone will be traversed by a COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES August 21. 1991 Project No. CL-4156 Page 4 transition from native to fill. Therefore, to reduce structural damage occurring from foundations bearing on two different soils types, the following measure should be employed. It is recommended the building area be undercut a minimum depth of 3* and brought back to grade with properly compacted fill. This will allow the proposed structure to bear entirely on a compacted fill mat, thus reducing the probability of differential settlement. The removal area should extend under and a minimum of 5 ' beyond the proposed dwelling. 6B. Foundations General The prevailing on site soils are comprised of nonexpansive sandy materials with above average strength parameters. Therefore, con- ventional foundations may be utilized, provided the aforementioned Grading Recommendations are adhered to. For One-Story Construction: Continuous footings having a minimum width of 12" and founded a minimum depth of 12" below lowest adjacent grade will have an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 Ibs. per square foot. For Two-Story Construction: Continuous footings should have a minimum width of 15" and be founded a minimum depth of 18" below lowest adjacent grade. Isolated square footings having a diameter of 18" and founded a minimum depth of 18" below lowest adjacent grade will have an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2500 pounds per square foot. All continuous footings are to be reinforced with one #4 bar top and bottom. Steel should be positioned 3" above bottom of footing and 3" below top of footing. Slabs should be a minimum of 4" thick and reinforced with 6x6, w 1.4 x w 1.4 welded wire mesh or #3 bars on 24" centers (both ways). Reinforcement should be placed near the center of the slab and extended through joints to provide a tension tie with perimeter footings. Welded wire mesh is a DEC approved method when properly placed. However, it is the past experience of this firm, wire mesh usually ends up in or below the bottom of the slab. Therefore, it COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES August 21, 1991 Project No. CL-4156 Page 5 is our opinion #3 bars placed on 24" centers is a more effective method with regard to concrete slab reinforcement. 6C. Estimated Paving Section Structural section for asphaltic paving for the proposed driveways and parking area are based on an estimated subgrade R-value of 45. The following section is provided for bid purposes only. Actual sections should be determined subsequent to completion of grading operations. Assumed Traffic Index = 4.5 (Light Vehicular Traffic) 2 inches of asphaltic paving on 4 inches of select base coarse on 6 inches of recompacted native subgrade. All materials and construction for asphaltic paving and base should conform to the Standard Specifications of the State of California Business and Transportation Agency, Department of Transportation, Sections 39 and 26, respectively. Class III decomposed granite, if used, should have a minimum R-value of 70 and sand equivalent of 30. All materials should be compacted to a minimum of 95%. 6D. Review of Grading Plan Approved site and grading plans were not available at the time of our investigation. Therefore, upon their completion, we would like to review them to assure compliance with the recommendations presented in this report. Preliminary site plans used during our investigation were provided by Vinedale Development Corporation, dated August 5, 1991. 7. UNCERTAINTY AND LIMITATION Surface and subsurface soils are assumed to be uniform. Therefore, should soils encountered during construction differ from those pre- sented in this report, we should be contacted to provide their engineering properties. It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to carry out recommendations set forth in this report. COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES August 21. 1991 Project No. CL-4156 Page 6 During our investigation of the subject site, evidence of faulting was not encountered. Subsequent to review of available geologic literature, we feel any faulting in the vicinity of the site may be classified as inactive. However, it should be noted that San Diego County is located in a high seismic area with regard to earthquake. Earthquake proof projects are economically unfeasible. Therefore, damage as a result of earthquake is probable and we assume no lia- bility. We assume the on site safety of our personnel only. We cannot assume liability of personnel other than our own. It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to insure construction operations are conducted in a safe manner and in conformance with regulations governed by CAL-OSHA and/or local agencies. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely^afigr^ciated. Respectfully submitted, COMPACTION LABS, INC. Ronald K. Adams Dale R. R President Registered Geotechnica^1 RKA:ras cc: (3) submitted (2) filed COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES EXPLORATION LEGEND UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SOIL DESCRIPTION T.COARSE GRAINED: More than half of material Is larger than No. ZOO slave size. GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS Sore than half of coarse fraction 1s larger than No. 4 sieve stzc, but smaller than 3". GRAVELS WITH FINES (appreciable amount of fines) SANDS CLEAN SANOS More than half of coarse fraction 1s smaller than No. 4 sieve size. SANDS WITH FINES (appreciable amount of fines) 11. FINE GRAINED: More than half of material 1s smaller than No. ZOO sieve size. SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit less than 50 SILTS AND CLAYS GROUP SYMBOL GW GP GM GC SW SP SM sc TYPICAL NAMES ML CL OL MH Liquid Limit CH greater than 50 OH HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Well graded gravels, gravel- sand mixtures. Uttle or no fines. Poorly graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, Uttle or not fines, S1lty gravels, poorly gradedgravel-sand-sllt mixtures. Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, clay mixtures. Well graded sand, gravelly sands, Uttle or no fines. Poorly graded sands, gravelly sands. Uttle or no fines. S1lty sands, poorly graded sand and sll.t mixtures. Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. Inorganic silts and very fine, sands, rock flour, sandy silt or clayey-s11t-sand mixtures with slight plasticity. Inorganic clays of low to med- ium plasticity, gravelly clays, lean clays. Organic silts and organic sllty clays of low plasticity. Inorganic silts, micaceous or dlatomaceous find sandy or sllty soils, elastic silts. Inorganic clays of high plas- ticity, fat clays. Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. Peat and other highly organic soils. Undisturbed, driven ring sample or-tube sample Undisturbed chunk sample Bulk sample Water level at time of excavation or as indicated APPENDIX 'A1 COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN TEST PIT LOCATION APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SEPTIC TANK PROPOSED LAP POOL PROPOSED HOUSE PROPOSED HOUSE 2 LOTS 237 DATE STREET CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. ci-4156 PLATE NO ONE COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES EXPLORATION LOG PROJECT NAME _ DATE AVENUE, CARLSBAD DATE LOGGED 8/13/91 ELEVATION EXISTING GRADE TEST PIT NO.ONE o5 .c Q.0> Q 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- /- i»-o (0 CO BG CK CK 1 .i* '55c<uQ ^D 114.6 «3 C-- £ £ Sw5 ^ 2.2 oO — -.CM vS * £, ggj </> 03855 Q_ 18.0 0) 5 £ "5.VO 0)CL m 05 2' 4' c.0 ?£to -aioa O SM srT1 Description & Remarks BROWN, HUMID, LOOSE, SILTY-SAND. (PLOWED GROUND) ORANGE-BROWN, HUMID, MEDIUM DENsT^ — v ^SILTY-SAND. 1 — > (FIRM NATIVE) (BECOMES YELLOW-BROWN @ 6') BOTTOM OF TEST PIT PROJECT NO.CL-4156 PLATE NO.TWO COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES PROJECT NAME. ELEVATION EXPLORATION LOG DATE AVENUE, CARLSBAD DATE LOGGED 8/13/91 TEST PIT NO.EXISTING GRADE TWO .c Q.<U Q 1- 2- 3- 4- 5- 6- 7- 8- Q. 15. w BG I 4-wc " Sfc-Q "E 0) o 3to '63E o If*w gj « w Q_ 19.5 «£ j= Q.(D O O & COto 4' co lltoQ O SM SM • Description & Remarks DARK BROWN, MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE SILTY- SAND. (PLOWED GROUND) ORANGE-BROWN, MOIST, MEDIUM DENSE SILTY- SAND. (FIRM NATIVE) BOTTOM OF TEST PIT PROJECT NO.CL-4156 PLATE NO. THREE COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS OPTIMUM MOISTURE/MAXIMUM DENSITY SOIL DESCRIPTION TYPE MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (LB. CU. FT.) OPTIMUM MOISTURE (X DRY vrr) ORANGE-BROWN SILTY-SAND PI @ 2 127.00 9.7 EXPANSION POTENTIAL SAMPLE NO. CONDITION INITIAL MOISTURE (%) AIR DRY MOISTURE (%) FINAL MOISTURE (%) FINAL DRY DENSITY (PCF) LOAD (PSF) SWELL (X) PI 6 2' Remold 90% 9.0 2.5 11.4 114.3 150.0 .000 Remold 90% NOT APPLIC^ Remold 90% .Bit DIRECT SHEAR SAMPLE NO. CONDITION ANGLE INTERNAL FRICTION COHESION INTERCEPT (PCF) PI @ 21 Remold 90% 30° 307 Remold 90% MITT APPI Tfj Remold 90% Dl C PROJECT NO. CL-4156 PLATE NO. FOUR COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS (General Provisions) 1. INTENT The intent of these specifications is to provide general procedures in accordance with current standard practices regarding clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to receive fill and placing and compacting of fill soil to the lines, grades and slopes delineated on the available plans. Recommendations set forth in the attached "Preliminary Soils Investigation" report and/or special provisions are a part of the "Recommended Grading Specifi- cations" and shall supersede the provisions contained hereinafter in the case of conflict. 2. INSPECTION & TESTING A qualified soils engineer shall be employed to inspect and test the earthwork in accordance with these specifications and the accepted plans. It will be necessary that the soils engineer or his representative be allowed to provide adequate inspection so that he may certify that the work was or was not accomplished as specified or indicated. It shall be the responsibility of the con- tractor to assist the soils engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes, new information and dates, and new unfore- seen soils conditions so that he may make these certifications. If substandard conditions (questionable soils, adverse weather, poor moisture control inadequate compaction, etc.) are encountered, the soils engineer will be empowered to either stop construction until conditions are remedied or recommend rejection of the work. Soil tests used to determine the degree of compaction will be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) test methods: * Maximum Density £ Optimum Moisture Content - ASTM D-1557-70T * Density of Soil In-Place - ASTM D-1566 or ASTM D-2922 & 3017 3. MATERIALS Those soils used as fill will have a minimum of 40% passing a #4 sieve. They will be free of vegetable matter or other deleterious substances and contain no rock over 6" in size. Should unsuitable material be encountered, the soils engineer will be contacted to provide recommendations. APPENDIX 'B' COMPACTION LABS, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES 4. PLACING AND SPREADING OF FILL The selected fill material shall be placed in layers which when compacted will not exceed 6" in thickness. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly blade mixed during the spreading to insure uniformity of material in each layer. When the moisture content of the fill material is below that recom- mended by the soils engineer, water shall then be added until the moisture content is as specified to assure thorough bonding during the compacting process. When the moisture content of the fill material is above that recom- mended by the soils engineer, the fill material shall be aerated by blading or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is as specified. 5. COMPACTION After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to not less than 90% relative compaction. Compaction shall be by sheepsfoot rollers, multiplewheel pneumatic tired rollers or other types of rollers. Rolling shall be accomplished while the fill material is at the specified moisture content. Rolling of each layer shall be continuous over its entire area and the roller shall make sufficient trips to insure that the desired density has been obtained. The fill operation shall be continued in 6" compacted layers, or as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes and grades shown on the available plans. 6. WALL BACKFILL Backfill soil should consist of nonexpansive sand. Compaction should be achieved with light hand-held pneumatic tampers to avoid over compaction and hence cause structural damage. Wall backfill should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of maximum density. 7. TRENCH BACKFILL All trench backfill located within structural areas should be compacted to a minimum of 90% of maximum density. APPENDIX 'B' CERTIPICATB OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page l CF-1R ******* *v6.01******** Date..07/27/03 17:49:38Project Title Jim & Lii Vine Project Address 237 Date Ave. Carlsbad, CA.Documentation Author... Michelle Hoang TH & A, Inc. 125 West Mission Ave, Ste 201 Escondido, CA 92025 760-746-5112Climate Zone 07 Compliance Method MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. Building Permit # Plan Check / Date Field Check/ Date MICROPAS6 V6.01 File-VINE237 Wth-CTZ07S92 Progratn-FORM CF-1R User#-MP2129 User-TH & A, Inc. Run-Vine GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area 3989 sf Building Type Single Family Detached Construction Type New Building Front Orientation. Front Facing 315 deg {NW) Number of Dwelling Units 1 Number of Stories 2 Floor Construction Type.... Slab On Grade Glazing Percentage 27 % of floor area Average Glazing U-factor... 0.4 Btu/hr-sf-F Average Glazing SHGC 0.53 Average Ceiling Height 9 ft BUILDING SHELL INSULATION Component Type Wall Roof Floor Ext Door FrameType Wood Wood Wood None Cavity R- value R-13 R-30 R-19 R-0 Sheathing R- value R-0 R-0 R-0 R-0 Total R- value R-13 R-30 R-19 R-0 Assembly U-factor Location/Comments 0.088 Exterior Wall 0.035 Ceiling 0.048 Above Garage0.330 Front Door FENESTRATION Orientation Window Window Window Window Window Door WindowWindow Window Door Window Window Door window Window Window Front Front Front Front Front Front Front Front Back Back Back Back Back Back Back Back (NW) (NW) (NW) (NW) (NW) {NW) (NW) (NW) (SE) (SE) (SE) (SE) (SE) (SE) (SE) (SE) Area (sf) 11 25 30 27 60 33 24 60 75 33 9 30 33 7 4 15 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .5 .5 .0 u- Factor SHGC 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 .400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .550 .550 .530 .530 .530 .530 .530 .530 .530 .530 .530 .530 .530 .530 .530 .530 Interior Shading Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard StandardStandard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Exterior Shading Standard Standard Standard Standard StandardStandard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Over- hang/ Fins None None None None NoneNone None None None None None None NoneNone None None City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: Residential: Second Dwelling Unit: Residential Additions: f Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Net Square Feet New Area £3 $L Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information:Date: SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real Carlsbad CA 92009(331-5000) San Marcos Unified School District 215MataWay San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the. additional fee if Owner requests, an increase in the number of dwelling units,.or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behattpf the Owner. Signature:Date; Revised 4/20/00 1635 Faraday Avenue Building Counter Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-27OO (76O) 6O2-2719 • FAX (760) 6O2-8558 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s))************************************************* THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT •«,-«„CARLSBAD, CAflSOOt DATE PHONE NUMBER Revised 4/20/00