The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2035 CORDOBA PL; ; CB071650; Permit05-30-2008 Job Address Permit Type Parcel No Valuation Occupancy Group # Dwelling Units Bedrooms Project Title City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No CB071650 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2035 CORDOBA PL CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type 2DU 2072403700 Lot # 0 $82,560 00 Construction Type VN Reference # 1 Structure Type SFD 0 Bathrooms 0 DUKES RES- BUILD NEW DETACHED 640 SF GARAGE VW 640 SF SOU ABOVE Status Applied Entered By Plan Approved Issued Inspect Area Ong PC# Plan Check* ISSUED 06/15/2007 LSM 05/30/2008 05/30/2008 Applicant DUKES ROBERT A REVOCABLE TRUST 03-25-98 7472 MULHOLLAND DR LOS ANGELES CA 90046 Owner DUKES ROBERT A REVOCABLE TRUST 03-25-98 7472 MULHOLLAND DR LOS ANGELES CA 90046 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee HMP Fee Pot Water Con Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot Water Con Fee Reel Water Con Fee $481 11 $000 $31272 $000 $000 $826 $000 $000 $000 $000 $31800 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 $000 Meter Size Add'l Reel Water Con Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF (31 05540) PFF (4305540) License Tax (31 041 93) License Tax (43041 93) Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) Sidewalk Fee PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Housing Impact Fee Housing InLieu Fee Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $000 $000 $000 $000 $1,50259 $1,38701 $000 $000 $324 30 $365 70 $000 $11200 $35 00 $54 50 $000 $000 $000 $000 $1 ,058 00 $000 $5,959 19 Total Fees $5,959 19 Total Payments To Date $5,959 19 Balance Due $000 BUILDING PLANS IN STORAGE ATTACHED Inspector J_Clearance NOTICE Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" bf fees, dedications reservations, cr other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions" You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these feesoxactions If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3 32 030 Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad CA 92008 PLAN CHECK NO EST VAL _ Cg-S". 1(0 Plan Ck Deposit. Validated By Date Q>\\^\Q^7 Address (include BldgjSuite fr)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No Subdivision Name/Numberimber KilJtL, Unit No Phase No Total # of units Assessor^ Parcel #ExistiifiiAJse SQ FT # of StorissDescription of Work /^tK/'1^ '+ A>VUt- St OQrtC/ &**.(/<»££<f«f+- , &tf£L I|2. TcWf^fPERSONXW difl^ftiiwapR»i|initiff|^!-'S;^sft^*Vv- • ' # of Bedrooms # ot/Bathrooms Telephone #Fa> # . . , (Sec 7031 5 Business jnd Professions Code Any City or County which require, a permit to construct alter improve demolish or repair any structure prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to th° provisions of the Contractor s License Law [Chapter 9 commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption Any violation of Section 7031 5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [S5 Name State License # /( S~^J?/ Designer Name State License # ^^^ „,„„,„, „ .v. .^vv. Address License Class Address P> City City State/Zip City Business License # State/Zip Telephone # f 2^2* ? - ^/ ^/7 , Telephone # Workers Compensation Declaration I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations D I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 cf the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued >Q I have and will maintain workers compensation as lequired by Section 3700 of the labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued My worker s compensation insurance easier and policy number are Insurance Company, ^tsffe. -fui^Sfsisfft} Js&UG&fs Policy No f £& */&/&. Expiration Date /£.— 2l ~O ~~7 (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF hE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) D CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California 'ARMING Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand llars($100,000), in aiddrf|on to thutfsllatgornpensation, damages are provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor Code, interest and attorney's tees I hereby affirm that I arrTexcmpt from the Contractor s I icense Law for the following rsasor, P I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation will d the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not ;apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does <.uch work himself or through Irs own employees providsd that such improvements are not iiitendel cr offered for sale If however the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion the owner-builde. will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) P I as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the oroject (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Coce The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and contracts for such projects with contractors) licensed pursuant to the Contractor s License Law) G I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement G YES D MO 2 I (have/have not) signed an application for a building permit fcr the proposed work 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed consti uction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number) I plan to provide portions of the w^rk but I have hired the following person to coordinate supervise and provide the rrwjor work (include name / address / phone number / /ontractors license numbe. _ 5 I will provide some of the w\k bJt I have contracted (hirec1) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work) PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE City of Carlsbad 1635^araday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008 ,- 760-602-2717 / 2718 / 2719 Fax 760-602-8558 Building Permit Application Plan Check No. Est. Value Plan Ck. Deposit Date JOB ADDRESS "Cf/PROJECT # LOT* SUITE#/SPACE#/UNIT# "S BEDROOMS " I # BATHROOMS DESCRIPTION OF WORK (Please describe present use and proposed use) TENANT BUSINESS NAME TYPE OF CONS OCC GROUP BUILDING AREA (SF) ADDITION AREA (SF) CONTACT NAME (If Different Fom Applicant) ADDRESS CITY PHONE EMAIL PROPERTY OWNER NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE EMAIL ARCH/DESIGNER NAME & ADDRESS GARAGE (SF) PATIOS (SF) STATE ZIP FAX STATE ZIP FAX STATE LIC # DECKS (SF) FIREPLACE YES D # NO D APPLICANT NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE EMAIL CONTRACTOR BUS NAME ADDRESS CITY PHONE EMAIL STATE LIC # AIR CONDITIONING FIRE SPRINKLERS YES D NO D ' YES D NO D STATE ZIP FAX STATE ZIP FAX CLASS CITY BUS LIC # (Sec 70315 Business and Professions Code Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance also requires the applicant lor such permit to file a signed statement that he islicensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractors License Law {Chapter 9 commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) r 'L " ' ~" •*-—'--- --' -L L '-- -L "-- J • ' ' Section 70315 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars {$500})| or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption Any violation of .. ^wj^ii^k,,. - .;•,:,.: ,;.:;v,;,,;(:,;: ^Mv-:^^:'''''iS::T--fe: •&'-. Workers' Compensation Declaration / hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations O I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self insure for workers compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit b issued n I have and will maintain workers compensation as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued My workers compensation insurance carrier and policy number are Insurance Co Policy No Expiration Date This section need not be completed if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less O Certificate of Exemption I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers Compensation Laws of California WARNING Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE DATE / hereby affirm that I am exempt from Contractor s License Law for the following reason C3 I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and Professions C ode The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not htended or offered for sale If however the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion the owner builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale) D I as owner of the property am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec 7044 Business and Professions Code The Contractor s License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor s License Law) n I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason 1 I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement O Yes D No 2 I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work 3 I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address / phone / contractors license number) 4 I plan to provide portions of the work but I have hired the following person to coordinate supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone / contractors license number) 5 I will provide some of the work but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone / type of work) ^PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE = uJ{j IT 0. Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505 2'>533 or 25534 of the Presley tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act' Q Yes d No Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district' O Yes O No Is the facility to be constructed within 1 000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site7 D Yes O No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, t EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec 3097 (i) Civil Code) Lender's Name Lender s Address I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws re ating to building construction I hereby authorize representative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned/property for inspection purposes I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT , OSHA An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5 0 deep and demolition or constriction of structures over 3 stones in height EXPIRATION Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Codelshall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is Suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106 4 4 Uniform Building Code) ^APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE \ City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Plan Check # Permit* CB071650 Project Name DUKES RES- BUILD NEW DETACHED 640 SF GARAGE W/ 640 SF SOU ABOVE Address 2035 CORDOBA PL Contact Person Phone Sewer Dist CA Water Dist CA Inspected „ Bv $-' Inspected By Inspected By s " Date .^/ / "T^LtA^ Inspected //T/^7 Date Inspected Date Inspected oM- ^Lite ^Fire~; Date 07/23/2009 Permit Type RESDNTL Sub Type 2DU Lot 0 /- Approved Disapproved Approved Disapproved Approved Disapproved Comments City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept Building Engineering 'PHrrmfng? CMWD St Lite Fire Plan Check# Permit # Project Name Address Contact Person Sewer Dist Inspected Bv ( JJK ^4_^ Inspected Bv CB071650 DUKES RES- BUILD NEW DETACHED 640 SF GARAGE W/ 640 SF SOU ABOVE 2035 CORDOBA PL GREG Phone 7606227117 CA Water Dist CA A g Date i y f\ AjJ?JLJ&\-^ Inspected"? /C>cX/' Date Inspected Date Permit Type Sub Type Lot 0 9 Approved iS Approved 07/14/2009 RESDNTL 2DU Disapproved Disapproved Inspected By Date Inspected . Approved Disapproved Comments City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Oept Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Fire JUL 1 4 2009 Plan Check # Permit # project Name Address Contact Person Sewer Oist Inspected Bv MS-V Inspected Bv Inspected Bv Comments CB071650 DUKES RES- BUILD NEW DETACHED 640 SF GARAGE W7 640 SF SOU ABOVE 2035 CORDOBA PL GREG Phone 7606227117 CA Water Dist CA Date Aj^ifotA Inspected 7 S 2.J ) \7 Date Inspected Date Inspected Date Permit Type Sub Type Lot 0 7 Approved ix*^~ Approved Approved 07/1 4/2009 -— J RESDNTL 2DU Disapproved Disapproved Disapproved City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For 07/17/2009 Permit* CB071650 Title DUKES RES- BUILD NEW DETACHED Description 640 SF GARAGE W/ 640 SF SDU ABOVE Inspector Assignment PC Type RESDNTL Sub Type 2DU Phone 7606227117 Job Address 2035 CORDOBA PL Suite Lot 0 Location Inspector _ OWNER DUKES ROBERT A REVOCABLE TRUST 03-25-98 Owner DUKES GREGORY S&CAMILLA E Remarks Total Time Requested By GREG Entered By CHRISTINE CD Description 49 Final Mechanical Act Comments Comments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# Date 07/14/2009 05/20/2009 05/20/2009 05/13/2009 05/13/2009 05/11/2009 05/11/2009 05/11/2009 05/1 1/2009 05/11/2009 04/20/2009 04/20/2009 03/04/2009 02/25/2009 02/17/2009 02/11/2009 02/11/2009 02/11/2009 02/11/2009 Insoection History Description 89 Final Combo 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 1 8 Exterior Lath/Drywall 16 Insulation 84 Rough Combo 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldmg 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 13 Shear Panels/HD's 15 Roof/Reroof 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 21 Underground/Under Floor 22 Sewer/Water Service 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring Act PA AP AP AP AP CO CO AP CO CO AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP AP Insp PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC PC Comments COMPLETE HEAT UNIT THEN WILL RECALL FRIDAY SEE BACK OF PERMIT CARD GARAGE PRESLAB EsGil Corporation In Partners/tip with government for "Burfcdnff Safety DATE 5/12/08 OAEEUCANT JURISDICTION Carlsbad — 1TTEANREVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO 07-1650 (New) SET V PROJECT ADDRESS 2035 Cordoba PI. PROJECT NAME Gregory / Dukes Second Dwelling Unit With Decks Over Garage | | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes XI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed .Person contacted Date contacted (by ) Mail Telephone Fax In Person XI REMARKS 1) The applicant needs to make the red-bubbled changes on sheet SD-3 (at detail 1) on the V set held at the City to make another approvedset. 2) Applicant to provide a signed and sealed copy of the structural calculations packet dated 10/11/07 (rolled in the plans and identified with a yellow post-it note). Thank you. By Tamara Fischer Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ n PC 5/5/08 9320 Chesapeake Drive Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership zinth government for 'Building Safety DATE 4/23/O8 a.APPLICANT JURISDICTION Carlsbad ^O-PtAI a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 07-1650 (New) SET IV PROJECT ADDRESS 2035 Cordoba PL PROJECT NAME Gregory / Dukes Second Dwelling Unit With Decks Over Garage I | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person 2<] The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Gregory Dukes 2035 Cordoba PI, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted .Gregory Dukes Telephone # 760 622-7117 Date contacted'V/^/#fby/&3) Fax # 760-720-0866 Mail Telephone v/ Fax In Person REMARKS By Tamara Fischer Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA n MB D EJ D PC 4/15/08 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 07-1650 (New) ^4/23/08 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete NOTE The items listed below are from the previous correction list These items have not been adequately addressed The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence The notes in bold are current 1 All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation (California Business and Professions Code) Current sets are signed This will be verified on final sets 2 Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations (California Business and Professions Code) Current sets are signed This will be verified on final sets 13 Please provide calculations for retaining walls based on soil report recommendations How was the equivalent fluid pressure of 35 psf/ft used in the retaining wall calculations determined'? There do not appear to be any recommendations in the soil report and it does not appear that the surcharge from vehicle loads in the garage above was taken into consideration 1) If retaining wall is to be designed as a restrained wall, please show that the slab is tied to the wall. 2) The revised detail on sheet SD3 does not match the revised calculations as the detail shows the steel in the center. The calculations are for the steel to be at the edge (d = 5.25 inches). The steel would need to be at the left edge at the bottom of the wall and right edge at the center of the wall. • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tamara Fischer at Esgil Corporation Thank you EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for 'Building Safety DATE 3/28/08 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 07-1650 (New) SET III PROJECT ADDRESS 2035 Cordoba PI. PROJECT NAME Gregory / Dukes Second Dwelling Unit With Decks Over Garage I I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff I I The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck IXI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck I 1 The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person 1X1 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Gregory Dukes 2035 Cordoba PI, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Gregory Dukes Telephone* 760622-7117 Date contacted ^^M^W^) Fax # 760-720-0866 Mail ^/Telephone Fax v In Person REMARKS By Tamara Fischer Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 3/24/08 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 07-1650 (New) 3/28/08 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete NOTE The items listed below are from the previous correction list These items have not been adequately addressed The numbers of the items are from the previous check list and may not necessarily be in sequence The notes in bold are current 1 All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation (California Business and Professions Code) Current sets are signed This will be verified on final sets 2 Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations (California Business and Professions Code) Current sets are signed This will be verified on final sets 13 Please provide calculations for retaining walls based on soil report recommendations and provide construction details for new site retaining walls Also specify the height of the site retaining wall so it may be added to the valuation How was the equivalent fluid pressure of 35 psf/ft used in the retaining wall calculations determined? There do not appear to be any recommendations in the soil report and it does not appear that the surcharge from vehicle loads in the garage above was taken into consideration. Carlsbad 07-1650 (New) 3/28/08 • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list9 Please indicate • Yes a No a • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tamara Fischer at Esgil Corporation Thank you EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for 'Budding Safety DATE 11/15/07 a APRUOAMT JURISDICTION Carlsbad CTFCAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO 07-1650 (New) SET II PROJECT ADDRESS 2035 Cordoba PL PROJECT NAME Gregory / Dukes Second Dwelling Unit With Decks Over Garage The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Gregory Dukes 2035 Cordoba PI, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed 2<] Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Gregory Dukes Telephone # 760 622-71 17 Date contacted H '/ '/^ fa }ffad&fy Fax # / i ~7 no - 0 &(o Mail ^Telephone Jr Fax . In PersonC<2-()--, - ^- .[XJ REMARKS New valuation and tees as tne jjyuject has been completely redesigned By Tamara Fischer Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 11/8/07 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 4 San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad O7-165O (New) 11 /.15/07 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO 07-165O (New) JURISDICTION Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS 2035 Cordoba PL FLOOR AREA 640 sq ft garage 640 sq ft Secondary Dwelling Unit 162 sq ft deck/stairs REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED 11/15/07 STORIES 2 HEIGHT 21' approx per UBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION 11/8/07 PLAN REVIEWER Tamara Fischer FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and sj:ate laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 2002 NEC The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad O7-1650 (New) 11/15/O7 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete Please note that this a new list based on the re-design. 1 All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation (California Business and Professions Code) 2 Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations (California Business and Professions Code) 3 Please add the area of the new garage (640 sq ft) and decks/stairs (162 sq ft) to building area on sheet A-1 Also, please revise label on new building at site plan to state "Proposed second dwelling unit over garage " 4 Guardrails at floor plan are referenced to the wrong detail (3/A4 instead of 4/A4) 5 Please specify garage stoop to be less than 30" above grade or provide complying guardrail Section 509 1 6 At detail 4/A4, please specify that opening at bottom of guardrail is less than 4" and at stairway the triangular opening between riser, tread and bottom of guardrail is less than 6" Section 509 1 7 Handrails (Section 1003 336) a) Stairways having four or more risers are required to have handrails Please provide complying handrails for steps to garage stoop b) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends Please specify at detail 5/A4 Carlsbad 07-1650 (New) 11/15/07 8 Please remove note about usable space under stairs on Section A, sheet A-4 where 5/8" gyp board is called out Enclosed usable space is not allowed under stairs per section 1106 3 2 2 9 Specify minimum !4 inch per foot roof slope for drainage or design to support accumulated water Section 1506 1 (Stairway landing). 10 Doors may open into the garage only if the floor or landing in the garage is not more than one inch lower than the door threshold Section 1003 3 1 6 Please specify at doors into garage 11 The City of Carlsbad requires a soil report for all accessory building which are over one story in height or over 1000 sq ft Due to the redesign, this project will require a soil report performed within the last three years (or updated with a letter) by a California licensed engineer or architect Please be sure all recommendations in the soil report are taken into account in the design and shown on the plans a) In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans Section 1629 4 2 b) Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4 Section 1804 5 c) Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value Section 106 3 3 d) If the soils engineer recommends that he/she review the foundation excavations Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and in) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report " e) Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (if required by the soil report) 12 Please specify that the height of the slope does not exceed 18' where distance to toe is shown as8'11" in order to comply with figure 18-1-1, UBC Carlsbad 07-1650 (New) 11/15/O7 13 Please provide calculations for retaining walls based on soil report recommendations and provide construction details for new site retaining walls Also specify the height of the site retaining wall so it may be added to the valuation 14 Show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan Section 106 3 3 15 Detail all post-to-beam connections and reference the detail to the plan Section 2314 PosttoFB-1 below. 16 Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc) may not be driven parallel to the flanges of TJI's (i e , along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written approval from Trus-Joist Macmillan is first obtained Details or notes on the plans should make this clear Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges The City of Carlsbad requires that this be noted on the plans. 17 In Seismic Zone 4, aspect ratios are limited to 2 1 for wood shear panels Table 23-ll-G (4' shear panel at line 1 upper as the plate height appears to be 9'). 18 Please strap stair landing into floor for lateral resistance 19 Columns and posts located on concrete or masonry floors or decks exposed to the weather or to water splash or in basements and which support permanent structures shall be supported by concrete piers or metal pedestals projecting 1" minimum above floors, unless approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used Section 2306 5 Please specify at posts supporting stairs/landing. 20 Please show the location of the air conditioning compressor and a GFI outlet within 25' 21 Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 10633 a) ICC approval number, or equal 22 Please show the location of the electrical sub panel for the secondary dwelling unit 23 Show on the plans that countertop receptacle outlets comply with NEC Art 210-52(c), which reads as follows In kitchens and dining areas of dwelling units a GFCI receptacle outlet shall be installed at each counter space wider than 12 inches Receptacles shall be installed so that no point along the wall line is more than 24 inches measured horizontally from a receptacle outlet in that space Island and peninsular countertops 12 inches by 24" long (or greater) shall have at least one receptacle Counter top spaces separated by range tops, refrigerators, or sinks shall be considered as separate counter top spaces Carlsbad 07-1650 (New) 11/15/07 24 In the garage, provide an adequate barrier to protect water heater from vehicle damage, such as by a 3" pipe column filled with concrete An 18" platform for the water heater does not satisfy this requirement UPC, Section 510 3 25 All new multifamily projects require the following note on the plan check list 'The City of Carlsbad requires the installation of a "bypass tee and associated ball valves" be installed above grade on the mam water supply line before it enters the building Please include the location and specifications for this fitting on the plumbing plans (The City Engineer has a detail available, Standard drawing W35)" 26 Provide insulation in ceiling to achieve STC of 50 between garage and living area if garage use is not controlled by resident Title 24 Please specify whether garage is controlled by the resident of the secondary dwelling unit 27 The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1R (4 pages) to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design CF-1R on plans needs designer or owner's signature. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list9 Please indicate • Yes a No a The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tamara Fischer at Esgil Corporation Thank you Carlsbad 07-1650 (New) 11/15/07 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO O7-1650 (New) PREPARED BY Tamara Fischer DATE 11/15/07 BUILDING ADDRESS 2035 Cordoba PL BUILDING OCCUPANCY R3/U1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN BUILDING PORTION dwelling garage deck/stairs Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq Ft) 640 640 162 cb Valuation Multiplier 101 99 2661 1441 By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) 65,274 17,030 2,334 84,638 Bldg Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review I I Repetitive Fee Repeats Complete Review D Other D Hourly Structural Only Hour* Esgll Plan Review Fee Comments New fees based on complete re-design $479 81 $311 88 $268 69 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue doc EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for 'Budding Safety DATE 6/27/07 a AEEU£ANT JURISDICTION Carlsbad TTPI^NREVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO 07-1650 SET I PROJECT ADDRESS 2035 Cordoba PI. PROJECT NAME Gregory / Dukes Second Dwelling Unit The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck X| The check list transmitted herewith is for your information The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to Gregory Dukes 2035 Cordoba PI, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed Person contacted Gregory Dukes Telephone # 760 622-7117 Date contacted^/T^M^ Fax # ~7 Q?O /Mail Telephone / Fax./In Person REMARKS By Tamara Fischer Enclosures Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 6/18/07 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 «• Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 07-1650 6/27/O7 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO 07-1650 JURISDICTION Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS 2035 Cordoba PI. FLOOR AREA 640 sq ft REMARKS DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED 6/27/O7 STORIES 1 HEIGHT 12'approx per UBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION 6/18/07 PLAN REVIEWER Tamara Fischer FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 2002 NEC The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance The following items listed need clarification, modification or change All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations Per Sec 106 4 3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad O7-1650 6/27/07 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list Submit three new complete sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects) For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways 1 Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave , Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700 The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments 2 Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468 Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments NOTE Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete 1 All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation (California Business and Professions Code) 2 Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations (California Business and Professions Code) 3 Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406 4 (see exceptions) a) Individual fixed or operable panels, other than those locations described above, that meet all of the following conditions It appears 7' high windows are within 18' of floor and therefore are required to be tempered. i) Exposed area of an individual pane is greater than 9 square feet, and n) Exposed bottom edge is less than 18 inches above the floor, and in) Exposed top edge is greater than 36 inches above the floor, and iv) One or more walking surfaces are within 36 inches horizontally of the plane of the glazing 4 Every stairway landing shall have a dimension, measured in the direction of travel, at least equal to the stairway width If a door occurs at the landing, such dimension need not exceed 36 inches Sections 1003 335 and 1003 3 1 7 Please show and dimension landing on the floor plan. 5 Provide stairway and landing details for back steps Sections 1003 3 3 Carlsbad 07-1650 6/27/07 a) Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11" When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum 6 Specify on the plans the following information for the concrete roof tile, per Section 10633 a) Manufacturer's name. b) Product name/number c) ICBO approval number, or equal 7 Applicant to sign City soils stamp before permit issuance agreeing to obtain a soil report if the inspector detects problems 8 Is back porch to be concrete or wood framed9 Please show on foundation plan 9 Please show the distance from the toe of slope to the face of the wall along north and west sides as well as the height of the slopes The setback between the toe and face of the building is required to be at least equal to 1/2 the height of the slope per figure 18-1-1, UBC 10 Please show or note the embedment of the vertical steel for the CMU stem walls into the footing on the footing details 11 Please specify hold down anchors and embedment for hardy panels on the foundation plan 12 Show minimum 12" clearance to bottom of girders at detail 9/SD-2 Section 23063 13 Show minimum underfloor access of 18" x 24" Section 2306 3 14 RH-2 shown on the plans (4x12) does not match calculations which call for a 3 1/2 X14PSL 15 Please specify sizes of posts supporting header at west wall 16 Detail 3/SD-2 shows joist hangers while detail 4/SD-2 does not Please clarify 17 Calculations packet includes a retaining wall design Please show the location of the retaining wall on the site plan and provide construction details 18 Plans specify FAU to be located in the attic above bathroom a) Please show ceiling framing on the framing plan b) Show the location of the FAU c) Show an access opening to the equipment in attics to large enough to remove the largest piece of equipment by not less that 30" x 22" UMC Section 908 Carlsbad O7-1650 6/27/O7 d) Note that passageway to the mechanical equipment in the attic shall be unobstructed and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic UMC Section 9080 e) Show minimum 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of furnace UMC Section 903 f) The attic access, passageway, and 30" working space must have 30" minimum head room This does not appear to be possible over the bathroom g) A fuel burning furnace shall not be installed in a room used or designed to be used as a bedroom (mam room is considered a bedroom), bathroom, closet, or in any enclosed space with access only through such room or space. UMC Section 904 5 Exceptions i) Direct vent furnaces, enclosed furnaces, and electric heat furnaces n) Access to furnaces located in an attic or underfloor crawl space may be through a closet h) Show a permanent electrical receptacle outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch located at the entrance for furnaces located in an attic or underfloor space UMC Sections 908 0 & 909 0 19 Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 10633 a) ICBO approval number, or equal b) Note on the plans that approved spark arresters shall be installed on all chimneys UBC, Section 3102 3 8 20 Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of the sub-panels If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations 21 For a single-family dwelling unit (and for each unit of a duplex), show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling NEC Art 210-52 (e) This receptacle must be GFCI protected 22 Show water heater size (1st hour rating) and type on plans Also plans state water heater is existing, but this is a new building UPC, Section 501 0 23 Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior UPC, Section 608 5 24 In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank) UPC, Section 5105 25 Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No 8093) Carlsbad O7-1650 6/27/O7 26 All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy) 27 The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1R (4 pages) to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction with the requirements of the approved energy design CF-1 R on the plans needs the signature of the designer or owner. 28 Show on the plans compliance with the residential energy lighting requirements (Mandatory requirement) a) In the kitchen at least one-half of the wattage rating of the fixtures must be high efficacy with non-high efficacy fixtures switched separately Note Approximately % of the fixtures will be required to be of the high efficacy variety b) In bathrooms all fixtures must be high efficacy style or be controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor c) All other rooms require any installed fixtures to be high efficacy or be controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor or dimmer (Closets under 70 square feet are exempt) d) Outdoor lighting fixtures are required to be high efficacy or controlled by a combination photocontrol/motion sensor Note Generally a high efficacy style of fixture is fluorescent complete with electronic ballasts Regular incandescent, quartz halogen and halogen MR lamps do not comply. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i e , plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc • Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list9 Please indicate • Yes Q No Q Carlsbad 07-1650 6/27/O7 • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Tamara Fischer at Esgil Corporation Thank you Carlsbad 07-165O 6/27/07 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO 07-1650 PREPARED BY Tamara Fischer DATE 6/27/07 BUILDING ADDRESS 2035 Cordoba PI. BUILDING OCCUPANCY R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION VN BUILDING PORTION dwelling Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA (Sq Ft) 640 cb Valuation Multiplier 101 99 By Ordinance Reg Mod VALUE ($) 65,274 65,274 Bldg Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review PI Repetitive FeeRepeats Complete Review D Other r—I Hourly D Structural Only Hour* Esgif Plan Review Fee Comments $406.66 $264 33 $227.73 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue doc Citv of Carlsbad 8UIL01NG P4_AN€H€DK OH€CK.b!ST DATE !) 7 BUILDING ADDRESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION PLANCHEC^NO €8 0~?~ ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBER £NGIN£€R'iNG DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The .Jem you have submitted for review has been approved The approval is based on plans information and/or specifications provided in your submittal, therefore any changes to these i*erps after trvs date, including field modifications must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conforrr.ance with applicable codes Please review carefully all commen's attached, as failure to comply with instructions in th>s report can result in suspension of permit to build _ A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements -E-ST VALUE OEMAL Please see^tSe^ attached report of Deficiencies marked wiln D Vake necessary corrections to plans or specrfSjatippfs for compl.ance with applicable codes and standards Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to th-s office-for-review By Date Date cy FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE 3UILOING PERMIT Date ATTACHMENTS _' Dedication Application — Dedication Checklist — improvement Application i_ Improvement Checklist _ Future Improvement Agreement _ Grading Permit Application _ Grading Submitlal Checklist _ Righ'-of Way Permit Application ~, Righl-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist ~ snd Information Sheet — Sewer'Bee Information Sheet ENGINEERING B£PT CONTACT PERSON Name Linda Ontweros City of Carlsbad Address 1635 Faraday Avenue -Car'sbad CA S200S Phone (760) 602-2773 OFO INFORMATION PofOGl Mop No Lo's Recorda'ion Carfsbad Tra 1635 Faracay Avenue • Carlscao 92OG6-7314 • (76O) 502-272O • FAX (750) -602-8562 ••*.^BUILDING- PLANCHECK CfiECtCUST SITE PLAN 1ST pND 3RD Q' CD D 1 Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale 'Show A North Arrow F Righl-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets 8 Existing & -Proposed Structures 'G Onveway widths C Existing Street Improvements H Existing or proposed sewer lateral D Property Lines I £xtsting<or proposed water service £ Easements J Existing or proposed irrigation ssrvice /O1 Jhu D 2 Show on site plan A-<D7ainage Patterns 1 'Building pad surface drainage must maintain a'minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course 2 ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE "Finish grade will .provide a minimum positive S~\ drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from 'building " B /Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography ;, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water E.ervice<s) that serves the project Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling -units and apartment complexes are an exception jr and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards fif D D 3 Include on title sheet A Site address B Assessor s Parcel Number C LegalDescnption For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include total building square footage with the square footage *for each .different use, existing sewer permits showing square-footage of different uses <ir,anufact<jring, warehouse, office, etc ) previously approved EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION -SlHL'DlfvG RLANCWECK CH£C*OrfST ST OtSCREUONARY APPROVAL COMPUANCg -Project does wit 'comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval ior Project No Q 4b All conditions are in compliance Date DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS D 5 Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm dram or utility easements on the building site is required for all new bun'dings and for remode's with a value at or exceeding S 15000 , pursuant'4o'Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 16 40 030 Dedication required as follows Dedication required Please have a registered Civil Engineer or land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal -description together with an 8 Vz" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report All easement documents must be approved and -signed by owner<s) prior to issuance of Building Permit Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process Submit the completed application form with -the required checkUst items and fees to the Engineering Department in person Applications will not be accept by mail orfax Dedication completed by Oate LJ IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a All needed public improvements -upon and adjacent to the building site •rncst be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of -the construction exceeds '$ 75 OOP pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code 'Section 1840040 Public improvements required as follows __ Attached please find an application form and submit'al checklist for the public improvement requirements A registered Civil -Engineer -must .prepare 4he appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on -the -attached^checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process The completed application form and'the requirements on the C"£»« SUIT he-«Bjl_DlNC ».-' NCH -.BWILOING-PLANCWECK'CHcCKUST checklist must be submitted m person Applications by mail -or fax -are not accepted Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to tssuance of building permit Improvement Plans signed by Bate Q O [D '6b Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant Jo Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 1840 Please submit a recent property'title report-or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of 'S310 so we -may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement This agreement must be -signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit 'Future public improvements required as follows D CD CD 6c Enclosed please find your Neighborhood improvement Agreement Please return agreement signed and notarized to the engineering Department Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by 'Date Q D D 6d No Public Improvements required SPECIAL NOTE Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building -site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11 -06 030 of the Municipal Code Q Q O 7a Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements Include accurate-grading quantities .(cut, fill import, export) Q Q n 7b-Grading Permit-required 'A separate grading .plan prepared by a regtstered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the tx»mpleted application form attached NOTE The 'Grading Permit must be issued and rouoh grading approval obtained prior lo issuance of a Building Permit Grading Inspector sign off-by Date Q Q CD 7c-Graded Pad Certification required -(Note 'Pad certification-may be'required even if-a grading permit rs 'not required ) f't suf ne-«iSjl_DiMC BUILDING PLANCHECK'CHECKLIST ,^-ST 2ND 3RD ODD 7d-No Grading Permit-required Q O Q 7e If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS O D D 8 A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required -to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Rignt-of-Way Types of work mducie, but are not limited to street improvements, tree trimming, driveway .construe!ion, into public storm dram, sewer and water utilities Right-of-Way permit required for Q D D 9 INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Cartebad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 €1 Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008 District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the €WA Exempt List You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance Industrial Waste permit accepted by "_ Date D D D 10 NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit The applicant shall .provide -best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level--prior to discharge to sensitive areas Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first D CD d 11 Q-Required fees are attached Q No fees required WATER METER REVIEW D D D 12a Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the -owner/developer 'is not oversized Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions If it is oversi-zed, 'for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water-used • All single 'family dwelling units-received "standard* 1" service -wUh 5/8" service ..ST ~ND ~*123 D D 12b 81MLO(NG P-LANCttECK CHECKLIST • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which inc'ude total fixture .counts and maximum water demand in gabions per minute (gpm) A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet rs attached Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size lor the unit • Maximum service and meter-size is a 2" service with a 2"'meter • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than -2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand (manifolds are considered on case -by -case basis 4o -limit multiple trenching into the street) Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations ^in gpm) prior to approval The developer must provide these calculations Please -foJiow these guidelines 1 If the project is a newer development (newer than 19S8), check-i he recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service ts reflected on the improvement sheets If so, at the water meter station, -the demand in gpm may be listed there Irrigation services are listed with a cirded "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W" The irrigation service -should look like STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 5 meter {-estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and 'the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such-as the buriaing plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit -of course), then -the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach) Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans -have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you -for your use Once you have received .a good example of irrigation calculations, keep-a set-for your reference In general the calculations will include • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest avvay from valve • TotaPSpnnkter heads listed ^with gpm-use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection in general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters .(unless the project ?s only'S'BD with no HO A) As iong as the project is located within the City -recycled water . ij , •* BUILDING PLANCfi€CK CMEOKLtST -,ND 3=50 service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new-recycled water iine m-the 'future D d CD 12c Irrigation Use -(where -recycled water is available) 1 Recycled water meters are-sized the same as the irrigation meter above 2 If a .project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to -this line to iirigate slopes within the development "For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans Installing -recycled water meters :s a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable \\ater until recycled water :s available), then the applicant must pay the San Oiego Water Capacity Charge if within three years, the -recycled water-line ts charged with recycled water by CMWO, then the applicant .can apply-for a refund to the San Oiego County 'Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this 13 Additional Comments C PLANCMECX CKi£~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET stimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal Address 24) ^h £iD< Prepared bv >^ EPU CALCULATIONS' Types of Use =>O( Types of Use APT CALCULATIONS. Types of Use S'DHj Types of Use FEES REQUIRED J3O9A -p-7 »*# I&7 /rtt-~7Date // 'Y u / Che List types and square footages 2 Sq F*7Umtsf Sq Ft /Units' Bldq Permit I jcked bv for all uses 1 List types and square foojaqes for all uses ' Sq F{AJnits) 1 Sq Ft /Units Date EDU's EDU's ADT's ADT's WITHIN CFD D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D 1 PARK-IN-LIEU FEE FEE/UNIT PARK AREA & # X NO UNITS TRAFFIC IMPACT ADTWJI' 4 FACILITI FEE/ADT BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST #1 X NAGEMENT FEE ZONE 'QFT ' X SEWERTEE EDU's BENEFIT AREA EDU's DIST #2 DIST #3 FT /UNIT FEE/EDU. D 6 SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) D 1 DRAINAGE FEES PLDA ACRES X D 8 POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE =$ HIGH. FEE/AC /LOW =$_ METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION 1 of 2 H \0evelopmant Services\MASTERS\FORMS MISCELLANEOUS \FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET doc Rev 7/14/00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D 9 RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES* $ *NOTE This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits 2 of 2 H \Development Services\MASTERS\FORMS MISCELLANEOUS \FEECALCULATIONWORKSHEETdoc Rev 7/14/00 533 oJ I IQ. Q-. a.a ODD PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No CB£T7 ~ Planner APN Chris Sexton Address Phone (760) 602-4624 P| Type of Project & I _____ Zoning^-'*** \jeneral Plan CFD (In/out) #_Date of participation Net Project Density (.Q DP/AC Facilities Management Zone _ Remaining net dev acres Circle One (For non-residential development Type of land used created by this permit ) Legend: C3 Item Complete Q Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO U^ TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval Discretionary Action Required: YES * — NO _ TYPErTQ ( HO Y CDP APPROVAL/RESO NO flflprft/ed DATE3." *> ff Q&9 01-3O PROJECT NO _ r> OTHER RELATED CASES Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action Conditions of Approval "full 4 tO tOtH&U tOtt/1 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES w^*" NO_ CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO_ If California Coastal Commission Authority Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402, (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt) X^O1^ ) V QC\ Habitat Management Plan Data Entry Completed? YES NO i-~- , . ' If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus ' > (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE') Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO _U^*^ (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21,1993 ) • '' , .-> • • • . .. *.,,.' .. , . Data Entry Completed? YES 'NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE') H \ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 3/06 Site Plan: Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale Show North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes) Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number )D D Potlcy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 1 Applicability YES _ NO i^^~ an an 01b a a a * i a 2 Project complies YES_ Zoning: 1 Setbacks Front Interior Side Street Side Rear Top of slope 2 Accessory structure set Front Interior Side Street Side Rear Structure separation 3 Lot Coverage NO Reauired 4PO ' Reauired "7 ' (<» Reauired Reauired /*> ' Reauired backs Reauired 3f) ', Reauired ""7 ' fc> Reauired Reauired PV Reauired |C>' Reauired "^ t O 7 o Shown f^J ' Shown 9 ' "7 Shown _rj Shown /S^1" Shown Shown ' Shown ^ ' to Shown Shown l<. t Shown 3^' Shown 3L^5'.^^To'i 4 Height 5 Parking ^Reauired Spaces Required. Shown Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required .... '.'/•"?*/" Additional I Shown -t *c-noticed OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER <; H \ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 3/06 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (Plan Check Response #3) Project: Dukes 2nd Dwelling Unit 2035 Cordoba Place Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared for: Al Paris Apple Design Group 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, California 92110 Project No.: 07048 Date: April 28, 2008 335 15th Street San Diego, California 92101 Tel. (619) 5 ... • . iviiKe oiirprenani '" : i & Associates ~ '• -^ - Consulting Structural Engineers Job Pvy '£&•£ <(-&e:>\bb'*J{ Sheet No i Calculated bv gVS^7? Checked bv Scale fe 0"7~ c?v( •& of "^ Date M/2-e/0g, Date Correction Response a Correction #1 All sheets to be signed by a structural engineer Correction #2 All sheets to be stamped and signed by a structural engineer a Correction #13 The retaining wall detail was updated to include a connection between the retaining wall and the garage slab The retaining wall detail has been revised to show a clearance of 2 75" instead of 3", which will result in a depth (d) of 5 25 inches The depth of 5 25 inches was assumed for all parts of the stem in the calculations, so it is sufficient for the center of the stem and the base of the stem The wall has been recalculated and the calculation is attached Title Dukes Residence Dsgnr Mike Bishop Description Date Job # 07-048 3 52PM, 28 APR 08 Scope Code Ref ACI 318-02, 1997 UBC, 2003 IBC, 2003 NFPA 5000 ' Rev 580021User KW 0603057 Ver 5 8 0 1-Nov 2006 ! (c)1983 2006 ENERCALC Engineering Software Restrained Retaining Wall Design Page 1 dukes 07 048 ecw Calculations Description 4'-0" Restrained Retaining Wall with 50 pound auto surcharge ! Criteria Retained Height = Wall height above soil = Total Wall Height Top Support Height = Slope Behind Wall Height of Soil over Toe = Soil Density = Wind on Stem = 400ft _p_50ft 450ft 400ft 000 1 1 00 in HOOOpcf OOpsf Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000 0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 60 0 Toe Active Pressure = 60 0 Passive Pressure = 250 0 Footing Strengths & Dimensions Surcharge Loads Surcharge Over Heel = 50 0 psf >»Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning Surcharge Over Toe = 0 0 psf Used for Sliding & Overturning Axial Load Applied to Stem Axial Dead Load = 378 0 Ibs Axial Live Load = 240 0 Ibs Axial Load Eccentricity = 0 0 in I Design Summary Total Bearing Load resultant ecc 1,914 Ibs 1 79 in ACI Factored @ Toe = ACI Factored @ Heel = Footing Shear @ Toe = Footing Shear @ Heel = Allowable = Reaction at Top = Reaction at Bottom = Sliding Stability Ratio = Sliding CalcsLateral Sliding Force = less 100% Passive Force= - less 100% Friction Force = - Added Force Req'd = for 1 5 1 Stability = i Footing Design Results Toe Factored Pressure - Mu' Upward = Mu' Downward = Mu Design = Actual 1-Way Shear = Allow 1-Way Shear = 1,991 psf 760 psf 4 3 psi OK 4 9 psi OK 85 0 psi 1369 Ibs 9204 Ibs 1 53 OK 920 4 Ibs 834 2 Ibs 574 1 Ibs 0 0 Ibs OK 00 Ibs OK '; Heel Footmg||Soil Friction Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 0300 = 0 00 in Uniform Lateral Load Applied to Stem Lateral Load Height to Top Height to Bottom 00#/ft 000ft 000ft fc = 2,500 psi Fy Mm As % Toe Width Heel Width Total Footing Width Footing Thickness = Key Width Key Depth = Key Distance from Toe = Cover @ Top = 3 00 in ( Adjacent Footing Load Adjacent Footing Load = Footing Width = Eccentricity = Wall to Ftg CL Dist Footing Type Base Above/Below Soil at Back of Wall = 60,000 psi 00014 050ft 1 50 " 200" 1800m 800m 1200m 050ft g Btm = 3 00 in 00 Ibs 000ft 000 in 000ft Line 00ft Masonry Stem Construction Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,385 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 528 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable Thickness = 8 00 in Wall Weight = 78 0 pcf Stem is FIXED to top of footing Block Type = Medium Weight Solid Grouted Design height Rebar Size Rebar Spacing Rebar Placed at Rebar Depth 'd' Design Data - fb/FB + fa/Fa Moment Actual Moment Allowable Shear Force @ this height = Shear Actual Shear Allowable Rebar Lap Required = Rebar embedment into footing fm = 1,500 psi Fs = 24,000 psi Short Term Factor = 1 000 Equiv Solid Thick = 7600m n Ratio (Es/Em) = 25 778 No Special Inspection @ Top Support Stem OK 400ft # 5 = 1600m = Edge 5 25 in 0000 00 ft-# 1 058 0 ft-* 136 9 Ibs = 2 45 psi 19 36 psi Mmax Between Top & Base Stem OK 227ft # 5 1600m Edge 5 25 m 0 136 144 3 ft-# 1 ,058 0 ft-# @ Base of Wall Stem OK 000ft # 5 1600m Edge 5 25 in 0294 3105ft-# 1,058 Ott* 452 0 Ibs 8 07 psi 19 36 psi 25 00 in 25 00 in 6 00 in 760 psf Oft-# 348ft-# 348 ft-# 4 87 psi 85 00 psi Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacmgs Toe None Spec'd -or- Not req'd, Mu < S * Fr Heel None Spec'd -or- Not req'd, Mu < S * Fr Key #4@ 28 75 in, #5@ 44 -or- #4@ 28 75 in, #5@ 44 50 in, #6© 48 Title Dukes Residence Dsgnr Mike Bishop Description Job # 07-048 Date 352PM 28 APR 08 Scope Code Ref ACI 318-02 1997 UBC, 2003 IBC, 2003 NFPA 5000 Rev 580021User KW 0603057 Ver 5 8 0 1 Nov 2006 (c)1983 2006 ENERCAL.C Engineering Software Restrained Retaining Wall Design Page 2 dukes 07 C48 ecw Calculations Description 4'-0" Restrained Retaining Wall with 50 pound auto surcharge 1 Summary of Forces on Footing Slab is NOT providing sliding, stem is FIXED at footing Forces acting on footing for sliding & soil pressure Sliding Forces _ Load & Moment Summary For Footing For Soil Pressure Calcs Stem Shear @ Top of Footing = Heel Active Pressure = Sliding Force = Net Moment Used For Soil Pressure Calculations -4520 Ibs -4684 920 4 Ibs culations 285 6 ft-# Moment @ Top of Footing Applied from Stem Surcharge Over Heel = 41 7 Ibs Axial Dead Load on Stem = 61 80 Ibs Soil Over Toe = 4 6 Ibs Surcharge Over Toe = Ibs Stem Weight = 351 0 Ibs Soil Over Heel = 366 7 Ibs Footing Weight = 531 7 Ibs 1 58ft 083ft 025ft ft 083ft 1 58ft 091ft Total Vertical Force 1,913 6 Ibs Base Moment = -3105 ft-# 660ft-# 5150ft-# 1 1ft-# ft-# 292 5ft-# 580 6ft-# 483 4ft-# i,62~80ft-# MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (Plan Check Response # 2) Project: Dukes 2nd Dwelling Unit 2035 Cordoba Place Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared for: Al Pans Apple Design Group 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, California 92110 Project No.: 07048 Date: Apnl 7, 2008 335 15th Street San Diego, California 92101 Tel. (6 ~, , rt- - -. iviiJKe SLirprenaiit & Associates """ - — ""~^-- ; Consulting Structural Engineers lob IX)\LL^ liivSit>bJ^<-& Sheet No ( Calculated bv l$i&H0P Checked bv Scale C1 /-C!U|g of ^ Date ^ /•'/£'" Date. Correction Response (Correction # 1 All sheets to be signed by a structural engineer Correction #2 All sheets to be stamped and signed by a structural engineer Correction #13 The retaining wall was recalculated as a restrained retaining wall The active pressure used was a conservative value of 6()psf/ft An auto surcharge of SOOpsf was added to the calculations This is a 2000# point load that is distributed at a 45 degree angle by at least two feet (the distance a car will park from a wall), resulting in a SOOplf surcharge at the footing Detail 1/SD3 has been updated Title Dukes Residence Dsgnr Mike Bishop Description Job # 07-048 Date 927AM, 3 APR 08 Scope Code Ref ACI 318-02, 1997 UBC, 2003 IBC, 2003 NFPA 5000 Rev 580021 User KW 0603057 Ver 5 8 0 1 Nov 2006 (c)1983 2006 ENERCALC Engineering Software Restrained Retaining Wall Design Page 1 dukes 07 04 3 ecw Calculations Description 4'-0" Restrained Retaining Wall with auto surcharge : Criteria Retained Height Wall height above soil Total Wall Height Top Support Height Slope Behind Wall Height of Soil over Toe Soil Density Wind on Stem 400ft _050ft "450ft 400ft 000 1 2 00 in HOOOpcf OOpsf i Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing = 2,000 0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure = 60 0 Toe Active Pressure = 60 0 Passive Pressure = 250 0 Footing Strengths & Dimensions Surcharge Loads Surcharge Over Heel = 500 0 psf >»Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning Surcharge Over Toe = 00 psf Used for Sliding & Overturning I Axial Load Applied to Stem Axial Dead Load = Axial Live Load = Axial Load Eccentricity = 378 0 Ibs 240 0 Ibs 0 0 in Design Summary Total Bearing Load = resultant ecc = 2,267 Ibs 098 in ACI Factored @ Toe ACI Factored @ Heel Footing Shear @ Toe = Footing Shear @ Heel = Allowable = Reaction at Top = Reaction at Bottom = Sliding Stability Ratio = Sliding CalcsLateral Sliding Force = less 100% Passive Force= less 100% Friction Force = Added Force Req'd = for 1 5 1 Stability 1 755 psf 1,130 psf 7 3 psi OK 6 0 psi OK 85 0 psi 505 1 Ibs 1,901 6 Ibs 1 51 OK 1,901 6 Ibs 21701 Ibs 702 7 Ibs 0 0 Ibs OK 0 0 Ibs OK Footing Design Results Toe Factored Pressure = Mu' Upward = Mu' Downward = Mu Design = Actual 1-Way Shear = Allow 1-Way Shear Heel Footmg||Soil Friction Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 0310 0 00 in fc = 2,500 psi Fy = Mm As% Toe Width Heel Width Total Footing Width = Footing Thickness = Key Width Key Depth Key Distance from Toe = Cover @ Top = 3 00 in 60,000 psi 00014 1 00ft 1 25 2~25 1800m 8 00 in 30 00 in 1 00ft ! Btm = 3 00 in Uniform Lateral Load Applied to Stem j Adjacent Footing Load Lateral Load Height to Top Height to Bottom Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,226 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 789 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable 1,755 0 0 635 733 8500 1,130 psf on-# 459 ft-# 459 ft-# 5 97 psi 85 00 psi 00#/ft 000ft 000ft Adjacent Footing Load Footing Width Eccentricity Wall to Ftg CL Dist Footing Type Base Above/Below Soil at Back of Wall 00 Ibs 000ft 000 in 000ft Line 00ft Masonry Stem Construction Thickness = 8 00 in f m = Wall Weight = 78 0 pcf Fs = Stem is FIXED to top of footing Block Type = Medium Weight 1 500 psi Short Term Factor = 1 000 24,000 psi Equiv Solid Thick = 7 600 in n Ratio (Es/En) = 25 778 No Special Inspection @ Top Support Design height = Rebar Size = Rebar Spacing = Rebar Placed at = Rebar Depth 'd' = fb/FB + fa/Fa Moment Actual = Moment Allowable = Shear Force @ this height = Shear Actual = Shear Allowable = Rebar Lap Required = Stem OK 400ft # 5 1600m Edge 525m 0000 OOft-# 1,0580ft-# 505 1 Ibs 9 02 psi 19 36 psi 25 00 m Mmax Between Top & Base <& Stem OK 243ft # 5 1600m Edge 525m 0395 4182ft-# 1 ,058 0 ft-# 25 00 m i> Base of Wall Stem OK 000ft # 5 1600m Edge 5 25 in 0758 801 4ft-# 1,0580ft-# 1,0650 Ibs 19 02 psi 1 9 36 psi Rebar embedment into footing = Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacmgs Toe None Spec'd -or- Not req'd, Mu < S * Fr Heel None Spec'd -or- Not req'd Mu < S * Fr Key #4@ 28 75 in #5@ 44 -or- #4@ 28 75 in #5@ 44 50 in #6(g 48 6 00 in Title Dukes Residence Job # 07-048 Dsgnr Mike Bishop Date 9 27AM 3 APR 08 Description &*5£r 3/5Scope Code Ref ACI 318-02, 1997 UBC 2003 IBC, 2003 NFPA 5000 Rev 580021 User KW 060; (c)1983 2006 ENERCALC Engineering Softwareuser KW0603057 V* s 8 o i NOV2006 Restrained Retaining Wall Design Description 4'-0" Restrained Retaining Wall with auto surcharge '• Summary of Forces on Footing Slab is NOT providing sliding, stem is FIXED at footing Forces acting on footing for sliding & soil pressure Sliding Forces Load & Moment Summary For Footing For Soil Pressure Calcs Stem Shear @ Top of Footing = -1,065 0 Ibs Moment @ Top of Footing Applied from Stem = -801 4 ft-# Heel Active Pressure = -836 6 Sliding Force = 1,9~oT6 Ibs Surcharge Over Heel = 291 7 Ibs 196ft 571 2tt-# Axial Dead Load on Stem = 618 0 Ibs 1 33 ft 824 Oft-# Net Moment Used For Soil Pressure Calculations Soil Over Toe = 18 3 Ibs 050ft 92ft-# 1842ft-# Surcharge Over Toe = Ibs ft ft-# Stem Weight = 351 0 Ibs 133ft 468 Oft-# Soil Over Heel = 256 7 Ibs 196ft 502 6ft-# Footing Weight = 731 0 Ibs 108ft 792 2ft-# Total Vertical Force = 2^266 7 Ibs Base Moment = 2,365 8~ft-# MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (Plan Check Response) Project: •.ndDukes 2na Dwelling Unit 2035 Cordoba Place Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared for: Al Pans Apple Design Group 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, California 92110 N I Project No.: 07048 Date: February 28, 2008 335 15th Street San Diego, California 92101 Tel. (619) 53 Mike Surprenant-1 ><)b & Associates sheet. NO : <>f_ Consulting Structural Engineers Calculated bv fe.S. ^ Date Checked by Dare Scale Correction Response Correction #2 The plans and the first page of calculations are signed Correction #lla The near source factor is located on sheet S-2 under the Structural Design Basis heading Q Correction #llb To be included in the soils report Q Correction # 11 c The soil bearing pressure from the soils report and the soil's expansive properties have been added to sheet S-2, under the Structural Design Basis heading The soils classification is under the same heading, although it is an assumed value, since it was not included in the soils report Q Correction #lld The note has been added to the foundation plan Q Correction #11c Letter is not required by the soils report Q Correction #13 The retaining wall calculation is attached Q Correction #14 The foundation plan has been updated Correction #15 The post, is toe nailed into the bottom plate, which is nailed into the beam (l'B-1) below it (per our conversation) Q Correction #16 Note 30 has been added under the Wood heading on note sheet S-l Q Correction #17 The 4 foot shear wall has been changed into a perforated shear wall Q Correction #18 The landing framing has been updated Straps have been added and derail 5/SD-3 has been added Title Dukes Residence Dsgnr Mike Bishop Description Date Job #07-048 446PM, 23 JAN 08 Scope Code Ref ACI 318-02, 1997 UBG, 2003 IBC, 2'003 NFPA 5000 Rev 560021User KW 0603057 Ver 5 8 0 1 Nov 2006 (c)1983 2006 ENERCALC Engineering Software Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Description 4'-0" retamg wall I Criteria Retained Height = Wall height above soil = Slope Behind Wall = Height of Soil over Toe = Soil Density = Wind on Stem = 400ft 050ft 000 1 000 in 11000 pcf OOpsf Soil Data Allow Soil Bearing Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Heel Active Pressure Toe Active Pressure Passive Pressure Water height over heel Footmg||Soil Friction Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 0300 0 00 in Axial Load Applied to Stem Axial Dead Load Axial Live Load 670 0 Ibs 560 0 Ibs Footing Strengths & Dimensions Fy = 60 000 psi 00014 1 00ft 1 25 2~25" 1800m Key Width = 1200m Key Depth = 0 00 in Key Distance from Toe = 0 67 ft Cover @ Top = 3 00 in @ Btm = 3 00 in Axial Load Eccentricity = 00m :,ooo o psf id 35 0 psf/ft 0 0 psf/ft 250 0 psf/ft 00ft fc = 2 500 psi Mm As % Toe Width Heel Width Total Footing Width Footing Thickness Stem Construction Total Bearing Load = 2,664 Ibs resultant ecc = 0 30 in Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,264 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 1,104 psf OK Allowable = 2,000 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 1 ,636 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 1,430 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 7 3 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 6 2 psi OK Allowable = 85 0 psi Wall Stability Ratios Overturning = 3 25 OK Sliding = 1 72 (Vertical Co Sliding Calcs (Vertical Component Used) Lateral Sliding Force = 529 4 Ibs less 100% Passive Force= - 281 3 Ibs less 100% Friction Force = - 631 2 Ibs Added Force Req'd = 0 0 Ibs OK for 1 5 1 Stability = 0 0 Ibs OK ; Footing Design Results ; Toe Heel Factored Pressure = 1 ,636 1 430 psf Mu1 Upward = 1,089 0 ft-# MM' nnwnwarri — 914 ^TQ ft-& Mu Design = 875 579 ft-# Actual 1 -Way Shear = 733 6 25 psi Allow 1 -Way Shear = 8500 85 00 psi Toe Reinforcing = None Spec'd Heel Reinforcing = None Spec'd Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Design height ft = Wall Material Above "Ht" Thickness = Rebar Size = Rebar Spacing = Rebar Placed at = fb/FB + fa/Fa = Total Force @ Section Ibs = Moment Actual ft-# = Moment Allowable = Shear Actual psi = Shear Allowable psi = Bar Develop ABOVE Ht in = Bar Lap/Hook BELOW Ht in = Wall Weight Rebar Depth 'd' in = f m psi = Fs psi = Solid Grouting = Special Inspection = Modular Ratio 'n' = Short Term Factor = Equiv Solid Thick in = Masonry Block Type = Medium f c psi = Fy psi = Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe Not req'd, Mu < S * Fr Heel Not req'd Mu < S * Fr Key Not req'd, Mu < S * Fr Stem OK 000 Masonry 800 # 5 1600 Center 0722 2800 3733 6194 70 194 3000 600 780 381 1,500 24,000 Yes No 2578 1 000 760 Weight Title Dukes Residence Job # 07-048 Dsgnr Mike Bishop Date 4 46PM 2 J JAN 08 Description Scope ? ' Code Ref ACI 318-02 1997 UBC, 2003 IBC ,'003 NFPA 5000 KSiSyR^ISgl^lS...* Cantilevered Retaining Wall Design Description 4'-0" retamg wall Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments OVERTURNINGForce Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft-# Heel Active Pressure = 529 4 1 83 970 5 Toe Active Pressure = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = SeismicLoad = — Total = 5294 OTM = 9705 Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 3 25 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 2,663 8 Ibs Vertical component of active pressure used for soil pressure Soil Over Heel Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = Soil Over Toe = Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = Earth @ Stem Transitions = Footing Weight = Key Weight Vert Component = Total = Page 2 I RESISTING Force Ibs 2567 6700 351 0 5062 3199 2,1038 Distance ft 1 96 1 03 1 Ci3 1 13 1 17 225 Ibs RM = Moment ft-# 5026 8933 4680 5695 7199 3,153~4 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB_ SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE . FOUNDATION DESIGN ALLOWABLE APPLIED LOADS Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure (ASBP) = CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS psf (Per Design Criteria) |wn MARK: CF-1 Ftg Width (b) = < ft = ASBP (b) = Depth of Ftg (h) = /• £ ft plf USE " WIDE x !&__" DEEP WITH # 5 TOP & BOTTOM MARK. CF-2 Ftg Width (b) = _.ft Depth of Ftg (h) =. WALLoW - ASBP (b) =_ ft USE " WIDE x DEEP WITH . TOP & BOTTOM WMAX @ Gndhne. WMAX @ Gndlme. @ Gndhne. @ Gndhne. USE CF- USE CF-. USE CF-. USE CF- MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF_ DATE _ DATE . ! CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS - MAX POST LOADS i •Tmax r / MARK- CF-1 PMAX = ASBP(b)(2h) =. 2h(ft) h(ft) LBS MARK- CF-: PMAX = ASBP(b)(2h) =_LBS MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB SHEET NO . & !-V CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. DATE. SPREAD FOOTINGS - MAX. ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATED LOADS PMAX MARK JM b (ft ^ = ASBP(b)2 =.^000 LBS h(ft) USE 24" SQUARE x i a " DEEP WITH (2) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK Pz2 LBS USE 30" SQUARE x i A " DEEP WITH (3) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK LBS USE 36" SQUARE x 16 " DEEP WITH (4) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-4 = ASBP LBS USE 42" SQUARE x {% " DEEP WITH (5) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK LBS USE 48" SQUARE x \g " DEEP WITH (6) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (Revisions) Project: Dukes 2nd Dwelling Unit 2035 Cordoba Place Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared for: Al Pans Apple Design Group 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, California 92110 Project No.: 07048 Date: October 11,2007 335 15th Street San Diego, California 92101 Tel. (619) 531. JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT I 7J & ASSOCIATES SHEETNO — OF Consulting Structural Engineers CALCULATED BY *^r- DATE. CHECKED BY DATE. SCALE TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 2 DESIGN CRITERIA SUMMARY 3 DESIGN LOADS 4 VERTICAL ANALYSIS A HORIZONTAL MEMBER DESIGN (BEAMS, HEADERS, JOISTS, ETC ) B VERTICAL MEMBER DESIGN (COLUMNS, STUDS, ETC) 5 LATERAL ANALYSIS A SEISMIC/WIND LOADS B LATERAL LOAD DISTRIBUTION C LATERAL LOAD-RESISTING DESIGN I SHEARWALL DESIGN II CANTILEVERED STEEL COLUMN ELEMENTS HI STEEL MOMENT FRAMES D REDUNDANCY FACTOR VERIFICATION FOUNDATION DESIGN A CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS flit B SPREAD FOOTINGS ._ 2o C RETAINING WALLS _. "" D SPECIAL SYSTEMS " I GRADE BEAMS - II DEEPENED PIERS -- SCHEDULES 1\ A SHEARWALL SCHEDULE 11 B HOLD DOWN SCHEDULE T> c HAjLH V"~p-i\tv\£: SCHEDULE 1.1 D SPREAD FOOTING SCHEDULE O5 FRODUCT207 Mike Surprenant (oh & Associates sheet NO L_of. Consulting Structural Engineers Calculated bv Date Checked by Date . Scale PROJECT SCOPE Provide vertical & lateral load calculations for a proposed approximate 1280 sq ft two-story second dwelling unit at 2035 Cordoba Place Carlsbad, California Residence to be constructed utilizing primarily wood-frame construction Roof framing to consist of conventional stick-frame, and the foundation system to consist of a concrete slab-on-grade with deepened perimeter footings A soils report was not provided for this project Therefore, the foundation design will be based on the minimum soil bearing capacity as specified in the current version of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) Mike Surprenant & Associates makes no representations concerning the suitability of the soils and/or minimum soil values allowed by the UBC These calculations have been prepared for the exclusive use of Mr Bob Dukes and his design consultants for the specific site listed above Should modifications be made to the project subsequent to the preparation of these calculations, Mike Surprenant & Associates should be notified to review the modifications with respect to the recommendations/conclusions provided herein, to determine if any additional calculations and/or recommendations are necessary Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations prepared in accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices JOB_ MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. DESIGN CRITERIA SUMMARY GOVERNING CODE: CONCRETE: MASONRY: MORTAR: GROUT: REINFORCING STEEL: STRUCTURAL STEEL. WELDING: SAWN LUMBER: I-JOISTS: MICROLLAMS/ PARALLAMS/ TIMBERSTRAND GLULAMS- SOIL: 2001 C B C. f c = 2500 PSI, NO SPECIAL INSPECTION REQ'D, (UNO) ASTM C90, f m = 1500 PSI, NO SPECIAL INSPECTION REQ'D, (UNO) ASTM C270, f c = 1800 PSI, TYPE S ASTM C476,fc = 2000 PSI ASTM A615, Fy = 40 KSI FOR #3 AND SMALLER ASTM A615, Fy = 60 KSI FOR #4 AND LARGER (UNO) ASTM A992, Fy = 50 KSI (ALL 'W SHAPES, ONLY) ASTM A36, Fy = 36 KSI (STRUCTURAL PLATES, ANGLES, CHANNELS) ASTM A500, GRADE B, Fy = 46 KSI (STRUCTURAL TUBES-HSS) ASTM A53, GRADE B, Fy = 35 KSI (STRUCTURAL PIPES) E70-T6-TYP FOR STRUCTURAL STEEL E90 SERIES FOR A615 GRADE 60 REINFORCING BARS DOUG FIR LARCH, ALLOWABLE UNIT STRESSES PER 1997 UBC TrusJoist MacMillan - ICBO PFC-4354 (TJI & TJI/PRO MEMBERS) TrusJoist MacMillan - ICBO PFC-4354 - (LVL/PSL/LSL MEMBERS) DOUGLAS FIR OR DOUGLAS FIR/HEM GRADE 24F-V4 (SIMPLE SPANS) GRADE 24F-V8 (CANTILEVERS) STING NATURAL SOIL VALUES PER UBC TABLE 1J-I-A SOIL CLASSIFICATION - SOILS REPORT BY DATED ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE (CANTILEVER) ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE (RESTRAINED) PASSIVE SOIL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT OF FRICTION /Goo _PSF JPCF _PCF PCF PRODUCT 207 •1 •1 •1 •1 •1 ^^S&SSir* MIKE SURPRENANT Jr\I & ASSOCIATES ^ \^~ Consulting Structural Engineers « Oft* V nSMPirrkia f OF . *-•' n*lf;[JL»TED BV , OATE CHECKED BY nATE _ •a-^iF RQOF DEAD LOAD ROOFING MATERIAL SHEATHING RAFTERS/CJ. (or) TRUSSES . INSULATION DRYWALL OTHER (ELEC , MECH., MISC ) TOTAL DEAD LOAD: LIVE LOAD: TOTAL LOAD DESIGN LOADS /CASEJ MATERIAL: \JM^WJc< SLOPE: V''V /I* PSF 1.5 4.0 15 25 0.5 1f> .0 PSF >b 0 PSF H .0 PSF CASEfl PSF 1 15 40 15 25 05 0 PSF 0 PSF .0 PSF 1 FLOOR DEAD LOAD FLOORING FINISH LT WEIGHT CONCRETE ( SHEATHING JOISTS DRYWALL OTHER (ELEC., MECH, MBC) TOTAL DEAD LOAD: LIVE LOAD. TOTAL LOAD: MATERIAL: FLOOR PSF .in.).«• 2.0 3.5 25 30/r o 1<* 0 PSF PSF 20 35 2.5 /f-0 PSF fr&.O PSF .0 PSF EXTERIOR WALL STUDS DRYWALL . INSULATION .... EXTERIOR FINISH . OTHER . . .. TOTAL LOAD STUDS DRYWALL OTHER . . TOTAL LOAD: FINISH: 10 PSF 25 15 /toO 1.0 10 PSF 25 1.5 0 1.0 .0 PSF .0 PSF 10 PSF 5.0 LO J MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE_ - - HORIZONTAL MEMBER DESIGN LEVEL: r<&F » MEMBERS: ' 0>E*W*v^ / H !&$£{& LABEL: P$-f SPAN= 2/1-O FT. 0 UNIFORM LOAD W-" t LJ CUSTOM LOADING (SEE DIAGRAM) '" «7 I 'lA.lka \C 'Ml \-> 2.1*. 'bi_ul. -\f-Wj = I /^/l^*/^ l^; VU III VT "2= 1 Pj = RT = /(^ IbS R» = VMAX= " lbs E = /~1fl<X/lf N< / } MMAX= 2^*?*!** ft-lbs IREO'D = USE: 7 |» xlMl^ GRADE: CM» C: ^ ALT: GRADE: C: LABEL: /-/f-f SPAN= Ao-O FT. t DxUNIFORM LOAD W POINT LOAD (CENTERED) } r * * I- ' VMAX = "> lbs E = TJ T L x> l\l ^ *\ MMAX= nOl^^ ft-lbs IREO'D = USE: yti' Hl-0 GRADE: Y~^ C: " ALT: GRADE: C: LABEL: SPAN= FT D UNIFORM LOAD D POINT LOAD (CENTERED) LJ CUSTOM LOADING (SEE DIAGRAM) " " Pi'- P2 = R, = lbs Ro = VMAX= lbs E = MMAX= ft-lbs IREO'D = USE. GRADE: C. ALT. GRADE. C « ; i^1 lbs too ksi in4 1 1 / S 1? lbs !X>-i ksi - m4 I lbs ksi in* PRODUCT 207 -^I_:F^ LEVEL: MEMBERS: | 6f LABEL: ffl". .«, /!»* MIKE SURPRENANT &A rr-rf-\«"T i'i '• 'r1 SHFFTNOASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers HAI CIILATPH RY T.HECKED RY .STALF ^/l fe^t^i SPAN= T^f FT. GK^JNffORM LOAD & POINT LOAD (CENTERED) D CUSTOM LOADING (SEE DIAGRAM) PI - fr^rl 1WP* = USE 5n /P ALT: * L -\> ^ »a '>V /i //T 7 RL = VMAX = «Dt | MMAX= GRADE: 1 ^ C: ^ GRADE: C- (# L /c.-»r f ,/ ^ft Ibs U Ibs ^11"fO ft-lbs 1 15 DATE DATE ! ! i, ., : •s E = ? OO^ IREQ'D = " i £ V ksi in4 LABEL: F0 -1- Q^UNIFORMLO D POINT LOAD D CUSTOM LO/ Wi ((5ff& Pl*= P2 = USE: / ALT: )^ SPAN= 2^-T FT. AD (CENTERED) . iDING (SEE DIAGRAM) 1 j \ ^2 ^| Jl VMAX - /W • ^ Pt MMAX=(FhO GRADE: !>*-- C. " GRADE. C- *"\ , ^1^- Ibs u Ibs rtTH''6 ft-lbs j ^n *%J *l 1n^ = 7\os .^ E = TOM IREQ'D = «• I \ ksi in4 LABEL: PI'•>""*-, B^UNffORM LOy D /POINT LOAD ( Hf CUSTOM LOA p1 1 F-j^R5 USE: 3 H> ALT- "t^ SPAN= I^T FT. o> CENTERED) £ DING (SEE DIAGRAM) J" f \vCf«AlMU(' KflilC74^! V ^fe 3>v ) V \[>* r " p\ P' 1 J^~ r* )^- 31 T /7|- y '1 ( I^F-t'MJ VMAX =\ ^ ' V*' /'in. MMAX= ' GRADE: W*1 C: 5B> GRADE. C- i ^\o . j j^ Mirlty 'f Ibs5y»S« ft-ibs p, » . Rn = Wf1!" 1 f bs E = /«ic>O ksi IREQ'D = — in4 ', ; D PRODUCT 207 FJ-1 TJ Beam® 6 25 Serial Number 7004001742 User 2 14"TJI®210@16"o/c THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED -2T- Product Diagram is Conceptual LOADS Analysis is for a Joist Member Primary Load Group - Residential - Living Areas (psf) 40 0 Live at 100 % duration, 150 Dead SUPPORTS 1 Stud wall 2 Stud wall Input Bearing Vertical Reactions (Ibs) Width Length Live/Dead/Uplift/Total 350" 225" 560/210/0/770 350" 225" 560/210/0/770 Detail Other A3 Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" x 14" 0 8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® A3 Rim Board 1 Ply 1 1/4" x 14" 0 8E TJ-Strand Rim Board® -See TJ SPECIFIER'S / BUILDERS GUIDE for detail(s) A3 Rim Board DESIGN CONTROLS Shear (Ibs) Vertical Reaction (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) Live Load Defl (in) Total Load Defl (in) TJPro Maximum 755 755 3884 Design -749 755 3884 0465 0639 31 Control 1945 1110 4280 0515 1 029 30 Control Passed (38%) Passed (68%) Passed (91%) Passed (L/531) Passed (L/386) Passed Location Rt end Span 1 under Floor loading Bearing 2 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading MID Span 1 under Floor loading Span 1 -Deflection Criteria STANDARD(LL L/480.TL L/240) -Deflection analysis is based on composite action with single layer of 19/32" Panels (20" Span Rating) GLUED & NAILED wood decking -Bracmg(Lu) All compression edges (top and bottom) must be braced at 3' 4" o/c unless detailed otherwise Proper attachment and positioning of lateral bracing is required to achieve member stability TJ-Pro RATING SYSTEM -The TJ-Pro Rating System value provides additional floor performance information and is based on a GLUED & NAILED 19/32" Panels (20" Span Rating) decking The controlling span is supported by walls Additional considerations for this rating include Ceiling - None A structural analysis of the deck has not been performed by the program Comparison Value 1 47 ADDITIONAL NOTES -IMPORTANT' The analysis presented is output from software developed by Trus Joist (TJ) TJ warrants the sizing of its products by this software will be accomplished in accordance with TJ product design criteria and code accepted design values The specific product application, input design loads, and stated dimensions have been provided by the software user This output has not been reviewed by a TJ Associate -Not all products are readily available Check with your supplier or TJ technical representative for product availability -THIS ANALYSIS FOR TRUS JOIST PRODUCTS ONLY' PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION VOIDS THIS ANALYSIS -Allowable Stress Design methodology was used for Building Code UBC analyzing the TJ Distribution product listed above PROJECT INFORMATION DUKES SECOND DWELLING UNIT OPERATOR INFORMATION David Reith Mike Surprenant & Associates 335 15th Street San Diego CA 92101 Phone (619)531-0757 Fax (619)531-0758 david@msaeng com FJ-1 14"TJI®210@16"o/c THIS PRODUCT MEETS OR EXCEEDS THE SET DESIGN CONTROLS FOR THE APPLICATION AND LOADS LISTED Load Group Primary Load Group TJ-Beam® 6 25 Serial Number 7004001742 User 2 9/28/2007121721 PM Page 2 Engine Version 6 25 71 '• 20' 7 00" " Ma:-; Vertical Reaction Total (Ibs) 770 770 Max Vertical Reaction Live (Ibs) 560 560 Selected Bearing Length (in) 2 25(W) 2 25 (W) Max Unbraced Length (in) 40 Loading on all spans, LDF = 0 90 Shear at Support. (Ibs) Ma;-: Shear at Support (Ibs) Member Reaction (Ibs) Support Reaction (Ibs) Moment (Ft-Lbs) Loading on all spans, LDF = 1 00 . Shear at. Support (Ibs) 749 Max Shear at Support (Ibs) 755 Member Reaction (Ibs) 755 Support Reaction (Ibs) 770 Moment (Ft-Lbs) Live Deflection (in) Total Deflection (in) I 0 Dead 204 -204 206 -206 206 2C6 210 210 1059 'i. 0 Dead + 10 Floor -749 -755 755 770 3884 0 -165 0 639 PROJECT INFORMATION DUKES SECOND DWELLING UNIT OPERATOR INFORMATION David Reith Mike Surprenant & Associates 335 15th Street San Diego, CA 92101 Phone (619)531-0757 Fax (619)531-0758 david@msaeng com Title DUKES RESIDENCE Job#07048 Dsgnr DR Date 1 55PM, 28 J.EP 07 Description ONE-STORY 2nd DWELLING UNIT Scope CALC & SKETCH General Timber Beam Page 1 dukes ecw Revisions-09 28 07 Description DJ-1 General Information Code Ref 1997/2001 NDS, 2000/2003 IBC, 2003 NFPA 5000 Base allowables are user defined Section Name MicroLam 1 75x9 5 Beam Width 1 750 in Beam Depth 9 500 in Member Type Manuf/So Pine Bm Wt Added to Loads Load Dur Factor 1 000 Beam End Fixity Pin-Pin Wood Density 45 000 pcf Center Span 1200ft Left Cantilever ft Right Cantilever 6 00ft Truss Joist - MacMillan, MicroLam 1 9 E Fb Base Allow 2,600 0 psi Fv Allow 285 0 psi Fc Allow 750 0 psi E 1.9000ksi Lu 0 00 ft Lu 0 00 ft Lu 0 00 ft Repetitive Member Full Length Uniform Loads Center Left Cantilever Right Cantilever DL DL DL 20 00 #/ft #/ft 20 00 #/ft LL LL LL 5400 #/ft #/ft 6000 #/ft Sum/nary § Span= 12 00ft, Right Cant= Max Stress Ratio Maximum Moment '• Allowable Max Positive Moment Max Negative Moment Max © Left Support Max @ Right Support Max M allow fb 699 09 psi Fb 2,990 00 psi Beam Design OK 6 00ft, Beam Width = 1 750m 0234 1 -1 5 k-ft 66 k-ft 1 21 k-ft at 5 -045 k-ft at 12 000 k-ft -1 53 k-ft 656 fv 49 27 psi Fv 285 00 psi x Depth = 9 5m, Ends are Pin-Pin Maximum Shear * 1 Allowable 533 ft Shear 000 ft Camber Reactions LeftDL 011 k Right DL 0 34 k 5 ©Left © Right ©Left @ Center @ Right Max Max 08 k 47 k 044k 060k 0 000 in 0 031 in 0043 in 044k 1 11 k Deflections Center Span Deflection Location Length/Defl Camber ( using 1 5 * D L @ Center ©Left © Right Stress Calcs Bending Analysis Ck 21 924 Le Cf 1 000 Rb @ Center @ Left Support @ Right Support Shear Analysis Design Shear Area Required Fv Allowable Dead Load -0 021 in 5030ft 6,997 5 Defl) 0 031 in 0 000 in 0 043 in 0000ft 0000 Max Moment 1 21 k-ft 0 00 k-ft 1 53 k-ft © Left Support 057 k 2 002 m2 285 00 psi Total Load Left Cantilever -0 126 in Deflection 5 820 ft Length/Defl 1,14293 Right Cantilever Deflection Length/Defl Sxx 26 323 m3 Area Cl 0 000 Sxx Req'd 4 85 m3 0 00 m3 6 15 m3 © Right Support 082k 2 874 in2 285 00 psi Dead Load Total Load 0 000 in 0 000 in 00 00 -0 029 in -0 235 in 4,992 7 506 0 __J 16625 m2 Allowable fb 2,990 00 psi 2,990 00 psi 2,990 00 psi Bearing @ Supports Max Left Reaction Max Right Reaction 044 k 1 11 k Bearing Length Req'd 0 333 in Bearing Length Req'd 0 849 in Title DUKES RESIDENCE Job » 07048 Dsgnr DR Date 1 55PM 28 SEP 07 Description ONE-STORY 2nd DWELLING UNIT Scope CALC & SKETCH Rrv 50UOIV-Us6'' KIV 0005503 Ver 'J S D 1 Dec. ,7003 (ci19S.'i ?003 RNfc'HCALC Lnaineenng Softwaie General Timber Beam Page 2 Cukes ecw Rei .sions-QS 28 07 Description DJ-1 Query Values M, V, & D @ Specified Locations Moment @ Center Span Location = 0 00 ft 0 00 k-ft @ Right Cant Location = 000ft 000 k-ft @ Left Cant Location = 0 00 ft 0 00 k-ft Shear 035k 035k 000k Deflection 0 0000 in 0 0000 in 0 0000 in JOB.07WT MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE DATE LATERAL ANALYSIS / DESIGN (SEISMIC / WIND LOADS) ^T~ CT AREA \W>^ ^H Seismic: V = (2.5 C, I/ R) W, - (Governs) Wind: P = CeC0qsI - 1.4fASD) ^ , Method 7. h™, = ^-^ ft Seismic Zone ^ Z = ^-^ Exposure ^ Basic Wind Speed *H* moh Soil Profile = <?b N.= K«> C.= Qj* . UBC Table 16-G Ca = 0.fo Cn = /.V . UBC Table 16-H I = 1 0 (Standard Occupancy") q, = |2-i« psf R = f -^ !„ s= 1 0 (Non-Essential Facility) W, - Total Seismic Dead Load P = C C, q« I - /I- 1 rf psf BASE SHEAR: V = D.|7T W> (ASD Load) (Assume p = 1.0, Verification to Follow) ROOFWEIGHTjA. %\ll^C f t r «YvA - /Iti Diaphragm = ( $) ' Wf All X.X tf / " />>5t43 Exterior Wall Weisht =\ 1 & ' f^T yVJ^Vt, JL_MfTV r ^ ^ M 1 Interior Wall Weight = (^OT /^ ' /-^ y C2Mff J ~ 5(^0X. Total Weight (Tributary to Diaphragm) = 2X> TM ' FLOOR W^IGHT://YAfef>V"T£ir M*) tut* - Diaphragm = . 1 /' tfT y\ /I-' jj s ~ InW Exterior Wall Wei^t = y(fi'p yL^vjUHf'^ "^ 6^1 * /^G^V Interior Wall Weight = V ^fffx. '^/^ )L_ KQ/T J^ 5^& " fyl*' ^*-» ' Total Weight (Tributary to Diaphragm) = I^JrO? FLOOR WEIGHT. ^1^. -^ Diaphragm = r Exterior Wall Weight = Interior Wall Weight = Total Weight (Tributary to Diaphragm) = TOTAL DEAD LOAD. Wt = *f llk 1 BASE SHEAR, V= (0,f?T) Wt= ?2-5"S \ " UNIT SHEAR, v = V / Area (Applies to single level structures only) = ' i LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS LBS PSF PRODUCT 207 ^T^iiHj MIKE SURPRENANT ir \TE & ASSOCIA-TES r^i \=^ Consulting Structural Engineers ^t. » i — r V 1 DIAPHRAGM LEVEL ROOF _J>LjFLOOR _I_JFLOOR 2 SHIiF™" , ,, / "^ np ^/-' f;^i ri n »TFP i^y n*ir= CMcrjCEDnv OATF SCALF LATERAL LOAD DISTRIBUTION wx h, wx b, (k) (ft) (k-ft) lJO^f& /?;0 375.WM V\% f-0 W?.flT - — — i^^Hm Oll.dn ! w»hx *" Swjh, A vx = Ov/A) 2w,h, (Ibs) (ft2) (prf) «ui 503 ^f ^io 9J^ .y? 32-1 tf 9*ir 1 ^or -- — L^r |M| 1,^7100 UT> nBiHHilHi V= %J-5s ~bs"" (SHEARW ALL DESIGN LATERAL LOADS) WIND LOAD SEISMIC LOAD PRESSURE (P) x PROJECTED VERTICAL HEIGHT (h) STORY SHEAR (v,) x DIAPHRAGM DEPTH (d) RQQF DIAPHRAGM- A = WIND: SEISMIC: P /!W fpsftx ftr fft> v, 15^ (osfix ^l (ft) E-W: WIND: " P MrHJr ^psf)x Hr) fft) SEISMIC v, 3JfA> fnsf) x fr> (ft) LEVEL DIAPHRAGM: A = its, WIND 1 SEISMIC. \ 3 _J!s_ ' TL. (pso x ^y.. (ft) c ni.«==- ,, w-r « <WIND P tfO f" (psfl x >J (ft^ SEISMIC, v. 1*5^ (nsfix 1^? (ft) LEVEL DIAPHRAGM, A = WIND: P (osft x (ft^ = SEISMIC- v E-W. WIND: P SEISMIC: v (pSftx (ft) = f pgf) X fft) : (psfi x (ft) = C^V m2) = 1T1 (plft *^$frv3^. GOVERNS = Z-Ki fplfi GOVERNS 7^^ fft2) = |6P (plf) yG^«^X GOVE31NS i \V\ It = /H ^(plft GOVERNS (ft2) fplf) GOVERNS (plf) GOVERNS D PROOUCT307 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB.JM. CALCULATED BY_ SCALE. il (IF "IKv-" HATE £>Story Shearwalls SHEARWALL DESIGN f/"5 Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = J--1 jg psf Gndline ' Tributary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level") _ Lateral Load (Level Above) Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = FX/L =plf Shearwall Type Ov J_J M ft Holdown Anchor Type Gridline ^ Tributary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) Lateral Load (Level Above) Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = FX/L =plf Shearwall Type Overturning: L =. Uplift = ft Holdown Anchor Type Gndune Tributary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) _ Lateral Load (Level Above) D Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = FJL = Shearwall Type Overturning: L = Uplift = ~ plf Total Load (All Levels), Fx =. ft ft . Okay by Inspection Lbs Okay by Inspection Total Load (All Levels), Fx= ft . Okay by Inspection Lbs Holdown Anchor Type D .Lbs .Lbs Lbs ) Vy v*y\j ) '5V> sq.ft. 2Tft Lbs :) - Lbs 7 Total >^ ft Load (All Levels), Fx =1J\\ I,bs PRODUCT207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE DATE •o^p Story Shearwalls Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = ^J » psf Gndline.A- Tnbutary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) _ Lateral Load (Level Above) Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = Fx/L = Shearwall Type Overturning: Uplift = . Total Load (All Levels), Fx =n-f a Pif ft . Okay by Inspection Lbs Holdown Anchor Type Gndline P Tnbutary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) Lateral Load (Level Above) D Shearwall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = FX/L = Shearwall Type: Overturning: L = Uplift = . Total Load (All Levels), Fx = JtL ft ft r _ Okay by Inspection Lbs Holdown Anchor Type Gndline Tributary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) _ Lateral Load (Level Above) D Sheanvall(s) Length, L Unit Wall Shear, v = FX/L = Shearwall Type \_^ Total Load (All Levels), Fx =. ft plf Overturning: L = Uplift = '. ft . Okay by Inspection Lbs Holdown Anchor Type .Lbs Lbs Lbs Lbs .sq ft Lbs .Lbs Lbs PRODUCT 207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers .«,OW SHFPTMO 1^ CHECKED BY_ SCALE OF DATE. KT- i ' Storv Shearwalls / (- / n, \ ! - r '" 5 Direction tsi.- } Unit Lateral Load, v = >0 5" psf •>»,« Tnbutary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) _ Lateral Load (Level Above) Shearwall(s) Length, L = /It?" * Unit Wall Shear, v = FX/L = Total Load (All Levels), Fx = 11 ft plf Shearwall Type erturnuig: Iift = _ri2 Ovi Uplift Holdown Anchor Type ft . Okay by Inspection M-Lbs n^Gndbne. Tnbutary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) _ Lateral Load (Level Above) (UttLb. Shearwall(s) Length, L = ^Hj^' Unit Wall Shear, v = FJL = Total Load (All Levels), Fx = ft plf Shearwall Type Overturning: L.= uplift =(*Vivti r ft . Okay by Inspection Holdown^Anchor Type Gndline Tributary Area (This Level) Lateral Load (This Level) _ Lateral Load (Level Above) 3/15" Lbs Shearwall(s) Length, L ' Unit Wall Shear, v = FX/L = . Shearwall Type <^ Total Load (All Levels), Fx =. ft Plf Overturning: L = Uplift = \ ft _ Okay by Inspection Lbs Holdown Anchor Type i — i /Uo Lbs Lbs Lbs*f IU ft .Lbs Lbs Milk Lbs .sq ft. .Ibs .Lbs Lbs PRODUCT 207 .« MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEFTMO CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE_ DATE_ f Storv Shearwalls £•"**" Gndhne A / 'II \t - r rnbutarv Area fThis Level) IN ^ nT ) ' Lateral Load (This Level) ' Lateral Load ( Level Above) Shearwall(s) Length. L = £-°O > T "~ Unit Wall Shear, v = F,/L = /Hi plf Shearwall Type <. i f Overturning: L = ft Uplift = Holdown Anchor Type i — i Gndline V (lj IfOt, 1Tnbutarv Area (This Level) V/ V\ f^iy *• Lateral Load (This Level) Lateral Load (Level Above) ShearwalKs) Length. L = !>t^ *~ Unit Wall Shear. v = F,/L = %^ plf Shearwall Tvpe (Q Overturning: L = ' ' ft Uplift = (yHK^>)> Direction Unit Lateral Load, v = ™ ' psf !«-.. few Lbs Zri1 Lbs Total Load (All Levels). F. = ty tl Lbs O*') ft ^ Okay by Inspection Lbs J IT sq ft IVI^ Lbs ^Tl1 Lbs h Total Load (All Levels). F, = ^ j Mi Lbs / ft Okay bv Inspection _ tr) i' Lbs Holdown ArTtehor Type rgn 'NUV V Gndline Tnbutarv Area (This Level) Lateral Load ("This Level) Lateral Load (Level Above) Shearwall(s) Length. L = Unit Wall Shear, v = R/L = plf Shearwall Tvpe < 1J r \ — r Overturning: L = ft Uplift = Holdown Anchor Type i — i sq ft. Lbs Lbs Total Load (All Levels). FT = Lbs ft Okay bv Inspection Lbs PRODUCT 207 JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE DATE REDUNDANCY FACTOR CALCULATION (UBC 1630 1 1) FLEXIBLE DIAPHRAGM WITH WOOD STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEARWALLS Lbs (Total lateral load at Gndhne "_V max - lw KM ft (Total Sum of Lengths of Shearwalls at Gridlme) F = W>? Lbs (Story Shear) As 'f.'V sqft (Ground Floor Area of Structure) CALCULATIONS- *max 20 rmax V •"• P =- <1 5 oo 10 OKAY PRODUCT 207 1 \i •••: P-" \. MIKE SURPRENANT &A CCf~\n ATTC SHFFTNDAi>i)(JClArta Consulting Structural Engineers CAI ran ATFD HY J SCAIF R ncir : DATF DATE FOUNDATION DESIGN Allowable Soil Bearing Pressure (ASBP) = CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS /boo psf (Per Design Criteria) |wn MARK: CF-1 Ftg Width (b) = L WMJ.OW = ASBP (b) =. Depth of Ftg (h)= W USE !ZT " WIDE x II " DEEP WITH L> # f TOP & BOTTOM MARK: CF-2 Ftg Width (b) = _Depth of Ftg (h) =. -Pif USE WIDE x DEEP WITH #TOP & BOTTOM ©Gndhne k WMAX @ Gndhne @ Gndlme @ Gndhne USE CF- / USE CF- USE CF- USE CF- JOB- MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY. SCALE DATE. DATE- CONTINUOUS FOOTINGS - MAX POST LOADS 2h(ft) MARK: CF-1 PMAX = ASBP(b)(2h) =_LBS MARK: CF-2 PMAX = ASBP(b)(2h) =.LBS D PRODUCT 207 JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHFFT NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. SPREAD FOOTINGS - MAX. ALLOWABLE CONCENTRATED LOADS PMAX MARK P-l PMAX = ASBP(b)2 =. bifLL LBS h(ft.) USE 24" SQUARE x l\ " DEEP WITH (2) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-2 PMAX = ASBP(b)2 =.LBS USE 30" SQUARE x f$ " DEEP WITH (3) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK P-3 PMAX =ASBP(b)2 =.LBS USE 36" SQUARE x f1 " DEEP WITH (4) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK PMAX = ASBP(b)2 =LBS USE 42" SQUARE x /£ "DEEPWTTH (5) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM MARK M PMAX =ASBP(b)2 =. USE 48" SQUARE x (f " DEEP WTTH (6) # 4 EACH WAY @ BOTTOM D PRODUCT 207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE. DATE. SCHEDULES D '• PRODUCT 207 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO . CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE DATE.... DATE £2 & 0 K £o «ft 3S I 8 Is 3 ab § N« 3 §1 3 a § vSs s «& i ^ Uv S* 8 •e 5 ^§Ozj • ii 1 s li ^ s |B Ifl I 1 ! 9 D § S C/3 5 !H ©<§)©© II C?5 §* V3 • 1 * l\??3S •i I §t g8 «•* ID1 2$ i 3 35 S K fe 11 I i I 8 I i ^fe B I!e MI s 6 5 a s,gio .., H £ 2 2 S S=i S I @® ©@ D i PRODUCT 2C7 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF_ DATE. DATE. HOLD-DOWN SCHEDULE M 4x POST w MSTC40 FLR-TO-FLR HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W MSTC52 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W MSTC66 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W MSTC78 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W/ CMSTI4 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN (34" END LENGTH * (14) ted TO EA POST; 4x POST W CMST12 FLR-To-FLR HOLD-DOWN (45' END LENGTH t (\00) \U TO EA POST) 4x POST W/ STHDS HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W/ STHDIO HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W STHDI4 HOLD-DOWN 4x POST W/ PHD2 ON SSTBI6 A B 4x POST W/ PHD5 ON SSTB24 AB 4x POST W/ PHD6 ON SSTB28 A B 4x POST W/ PHD8 ON SSTB2& AB 4x POST W/ HD8A ON SSTB26 A B 4x POST W/ HD10A ON SSTB2& A 3 4x POST W/ HDI4A ON SSTB34 A B NOTES HOLD DOWN ANCHORS MUST BE TIED IN PLACE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION 2) DEEPEN FOOTINGS TO PROVIDE 3° MIN CONCRETE COVER WHERE HOLD DOWN ANCHORS ARE LONGER THAN THE FTG DEPTH 3; USE (Rj; OPTION ON STHD HOLD-DOWNS FOR RAISED WOOD SUB-FLOOR CONDITION REV JAN 2001 PRODUCT a? JOB. MIKE SURPRENANT s ^ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY Of. DATE DATE ._t^=~ '. HARDY FRAME SCHEDULE MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers JOB. SHEET NO. CALCULATED BY_ CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE. OATE_ SPREAD FOOTING SCHEDULE SYMBOL <8> <8> <8><g> <6> SIZE AND REINFORCEMENT 24' SQUARE X ft " DEEP W (2) 30' SQUARE X !H ' DEEP W (3) 36" SQUARE X \\ " DEEP W/ (4) 42" SQUARE X ft " DEEP W/ ft) 48' SQUARE xfl " DEEP W/ ((,) # 4 EACH WAY ft 4 EACH NAY ft 4 EACH WAY # 4 EACH WAY ft 4 EACH WAY PRODUCT 207 February^ 2009 PO Box 1195 , California 92040 (619) 443-0060 Camilla Dukes ~ ~ 2035 Cordoba Place Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT File No 1106J7-07 Foundation Excavation Inspection Proposed Residential Addition and Garage 203 S Cordoba Place City of Carlsbad Dear Mrs Dukes In accordance with your request, a representative of our firm has inspected the foundation excavations for the proposed garage with residential second story The footing excavations are approximately IS to 48 mches ui depth and are founded a minimum of 12 inches into firm natural ground It is our opinion that the footing excavations are suitable for the proposed development Reinforcing in footings should consist! of at least one #4 steel bar placed horizontally, continuously in the top and bottom of continuous footings regardless of structural requirements In addition to the top and bottom reinforcements, a #4 steel bar should be placed horizontally for each additional foot of depth beyond 24 mches Reinforcing for isolated footings is dictated by the structural requirements If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our office Respectfully submitted, Smyth, RCE 21650 JCS/ss ZB nios 8t> £1 B09S/0T/S0 HIKE SURPRENflNT fe ASSO Fax 619-531-0758 Feb 4 2009 09 17am P002/003 MIKE SURPRENANT & ASSOCIATES Consulting Structural Engineers 0 PftOQUCTOT January 2, 2008 PO Box 1195 Lakeside, California 92040 (619) 443-0060 Camilla Dukes 203 5 Cordoba Place Carlsbad, California 92008 SUBJECT File No 1106J7-07 SITE INSPECTION Proposed Residential Addition and Garage 203 5 Cordoba Place City of Carlsbad Dear Mrs Dukes SCOPE In accordance with your request, a Site Inspection has been performed at the subject site The purpose of this investigation was to examine existing site conditions and provide engineering recommendations for the proposed additions to the existing single-family residential structure It is our understanding that a garage with second story living area is proposed FIELD INSPECTION In order to accomplish this purpose, a representative of this firm visited the site, reviewed the topography and site conditions and visually and textually classified the surface and near surface soils Representative samples of the on-site soils were obtained from a test exploration approximately three feet m depth and tested for density, shear strength and expansive characteristics SITE CONDITIONS The subject site is a residential property located on the east side of Cordoba Place The area slopes from south to north at an approximate 5 to 6 degree grade with the property south of the subject site being approximately 4 or 5 feet higher and the property to the north being approximately 4 feet lower The site is presently occupied by a split-level single-family residence A three-foot high retaining wall is located on the northeast side of the property, a four-foot retaining wall is located on southeast side of the property and a four-foot retaining wall is located from the existing house to the east property line It appears that the property Camilla Dukes File No 1106J7-07 January 2, 2008 has been graded as a cut/fill lot It is our understanding that the new construction will be located on the cut portion of the property SOIL CONDITIONS The soils encountered m the provided trench location were native firm, brown, silty sands (topsoil) to approximately 4 inches in depth were medium dense to dense, lightly cemented, grey, silty, sands were encountered to the bottom of the exploration, approximately three fee* in depth The sandy soils encountered in the test explorations were not considered to be detrimentally expansive with respect to change in volume with change in moisture content and will not require special foundation design to resist expansive soils CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 1 A representative sample of the foundation soil was remolded to 90% of maximum dry density Based on the following test results, a safe allowable bearing value of at least 2000 pounds per square foot may be used in designing the proposed structure This value may be increased by one third for wind and/or seismic loading |0Angle of internal friction 31c Cohesion 244 psf Unit weight 104 0 pcf Maximum Dry Density 1149 pcf Optimum Moisture Content 13 5% Expansion Index 36 The proposed structure should be should be supported on footings extending at least 18 inches into firm natural ground We anticipate that the footing depth for the proposed new structure will be 18 inches in order to achieve the proper strata, however, this must be determined at the time of excavation The footing excavations should be inspected by a representative of this firm prior to placement of forms and reinforcing steel to insure that proper depth has been achieved Reinforcing in footings should consist of at least one #4 steel bar placed horizontally, continuously in the top and bottom of continuous footings regardless of structural requirements In addition to the top and bottom reinforcements, a #4 steel bar should be placed horizontally for each additional foot of depth beyond 18 inches if the footings will be more than 18 inches deep. Reinforcing for isolated footings is dictated by the structural requirements These recommendations are based upon on Camilla Dukes File No 1106J7-07 January 2,2008 the soil type encountered and do not take into consideration the proposed bearing load 4 Concrete slabs-on-grade should be constructed to have a nominal thickness of 4" and underlain with a sand blanket of 3 inches in thickness Provide minimum temperature reinforcement consisting of 6X6-10/10 welded wire mesh The sand subbase (sand blanket) should have a sand equivalent exceeding 30 per ASTM D2419 All slabs should either have a conventional thickened edge or be poured monohthically with continuous footings at the slabs perimeter Conventional thickened edges should be 8" thick at slab edge, uniformly tapering to 4" thick at 2' from slab edge The thickened edges or monolithic footings should extend completely around the slab's perimeter Construction and expansion joints should be considered slab edges Maximum spacing of expansion joints is 50' for interior slabs and 30' for exterior slabs If any grading is proposed for this project, the following grading specifications should be utilized RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS Proposed Residential Addition and Garage 2035 Cordoba Place City of Carlsbad GENERAL: Soil Testers and 'Soil Engineer' are synonymous hereinafter and shall be employed to inspect and test earthwork in accordance with these specifications, the accepted plans, and the requirements of any junsdictive governmental agencies They are to be allowed adequate access so that the inspections and tests may be performed The Soil Engineer shall be apprised of schedules and any unforeseen soil conditions Substandard conditions or workmanship, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, or deviation from the lines and grades shown on the plans, etc, shall be cause for the soil engineer to either stop construction until the conditions are corrected or recommend rejection of the work Refusal to comply with these specifications or the recommendations and/or interpretations of the soil engineer will be cause for the soil engineer and/or his representative to immediately terminate his services Deviations from the recommendations of the Soil Report, from the plans, or from these Specifications must be approved in writing by the owner and the contractor and endorsed by the soil engineer SOIL TEST METHODS: Maximum Density & Opt Moisture - ASTM D1557-70 Camilla Dukes File No 1106J7-07 January 2, 2008 Density of Soil In-Place - ASTM D1556, D2922 and D3017 Soil Expansion -- UBC STANDARD 29-2 Shear Strength - ASTM D3080-72 Gradation & Gram Size -- ASTM D1140-71 Capillary Moisture Tension ~ ASTM D23 25-68 Organic Content - % Weight loss after heating for 24 hours at 300° F and after deducting soil moisture LIMITING SOIL CONDITIONS: Minimum Compaction 90% for 'disturbed' soils (Existing fill, newly placed fill, plowed ground, etc ) 84% for natural, undisturbed soils 95% for pavement subgrade within 2' of finish grade and pavement base course Expansive Soils Expansion index exceeding 20 Insufficient fines Less than 40% passing the #4 sieve Oversized Particles Rocks over 10" in diameter PREPARATION OF AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL: Brush, trash, debris and detrimental soils shall be cleared from the areas to receive fill Detrimental soils shall be removed to firm competent soil Slopes exceeding 20% should be stepped uphill with benches 10' or greater m width Scarify area to receive fill to 6" depth and compact FILL MATERIAL shall not contain insufficient fines, oversized particles, or excessive: orgamcs On-site disposition of oversized rock or expansive soils is to be at the written direction of the Soil Engineer Select fill shall be as specified by the soil engineer All fills shall be compacted and tested SUBDRAINS shall be installed if required by and as directed by and detailed by the soil engineer and shall be left operable and unobstructed They shall consist of 3" plastic- perforated pipe set in a minimum cover of 4" of filter rock in a 'vee' ditch to intercept and drain free ground from the mass fills Perforated pipe shall be schedule 40. Poly-Vinyl-Chloride or Acrylomtnle Butadienne Styrene plastic Rock filter material shall conform to the following gradation Sieve size 3/4" #4 #30 #200 %Passmg 90-100 25-50 5-20 0-7 Subdrams shall be set at a minimum gradient of 0 2% to drain by gravity and shall be tested by dye flushing before acceptance Drains found inoperable shall be excavated and replaced Camilla Dukes File No 1106J7-07 January 2, 2008 CAPPING EXPANSIVE SOILS: If capping expansive soils with non-expansive soil to mitigate the expansive potential is used, the cap should be compacted, non-expansive, select soil placed for a minimum thickness 3' over the expansive soil and for a minimum distance of 8' beyond the exterior perimeter of the structure Special precautions should be taken to ensure that the non-expansive soil remains uncontammated and the minimum thickness and dimensions around the structure are maintained The expansive soils underlying the cap of non-expansive cap should be pre-saturated to a depth of 3' to obtain a degree saturation exceeding 90% before any construction supported by the compacted cap The non-expansive soil comprising the cap should conform to the following Minimum Compaction 90 % Maximum Expansion Index 30 Minimum Angle of Internal Friction 33 Deg Cohesion Intercept 100 psf UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS: Soil Testers assume no responsibility for conditions that differ from those described in the applicable current reports and documents for this property Upon termination of the soil engineer's services for any reason, his fees up to the time of termination become due and payable If it is necessary for the soil engineer to issue an unfavorable report concerning the work that he has been hired to test and inspect, the soil engineer shall not be held liable for any damages that might result from his 'unfavorable report' If we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated Respectfully submitted, Josecli C Smyth, RCE21650 1 ^~JJCS/ss 02'26'2003 12 17 6194430933 SOIL TESTERS 02 CHRJSTIAN WHLELFK ]anum 30 200$ Soil 1 e-Aer- CW> 2Qfl002f. 01 Pnsi Otfice Bot 1195 LaktMdc, C, \ 92040 SUBJECT SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA, PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL ADDITION AND GARAGE, 2035 CORDOBA PLACE, CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RFFCRFNFCLS 1) Sue Inspection, Proposed Residential Addition and Garage 2035 Cordoba Place, City of Carlsbad California by Soil Icsrers, File No 1106E5-07 dated May 16, 2007 2) Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones m California and Adjacent Poitions of Nevada by California Division of Mines and Geology, dated February 1998 "5) Geologic Maps of the Nordiwejjlern Pare of i>an Diego County, California California Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 96-02 by Siang S Tan and Michael P Kennedy 4) Compaction Test Results, Laguna Riviera Unit No 2, Cailsbad, California by Woodward-Clyde &. Associates, Project No 66-237-2, dared September 20, 19f>8 De^i Laches and Gentlemen In iceoidancc wirh \our request, we have prepared this lecu-r to present pcrDnem .scisrriie/geoiechnical infonrutiun KirnjclmK the proiect site The scope ol our limited stuely conbisted of a review of the u (oenced soils icpou a reiicw of other pertinent literature, and rhc preparation of rhi-, letrer ihar includes on i GENERAL GEOLOGIC SETTING The project site is located m the Coasial Plains Ph I'pA nice f>( Sin I)iej<<i (.ounrv int,l is undtrlajn by Tt rnnrj--igc sedimtni uy dcposir*- associated ic^iduai1 SIM'K iiul ,nhricial Fill The near-surface n>atc.n/ils it the sire are described m rlu ief<_unced Hpoa by bod Mercury SUeci 4 ^fln Diek<i CA 92111 -»- a 5 .H 49(> 9~6() 4- HA> 02'26-'2008 12 17 6194436933 C.VC-E 208002801 SOIL TESTERS PnGE 83 Januar> 30, 2003 "- SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS Based on a maximum magnmide (Mma\) cairhquake of 7 2 along the nciiest poinon of the Rose Cam/on Fault Zone, the Maximum Bedrock Acceleration ar The bite would be .ippioMinarch 0 32 g The seismicall}. iclated design parameter from the Cfllifoinia Building Code (CBC) 2(K17 edition Volume II Chapter 16, are presented in tabular form below TABLE II CBC 2007 EDITION - SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS CBC -Chapter 16 Table Number 161352 16)35(3) 16H5(4) ir>1353(l) 161353(2) Seismic Design Parameter Site Cla« (Sod Profile Name) Mapped Spectral Acceleration for Short Periods (0 2 sec) S> Mapped Spectral Acceleration for 1 0 bee Peuods (1 0 sec) Si Site Coefficient Fa Site Coefficient Fv Recommended Value D 1 25 05 10 1 5 LIQUEFACTION Liquefaction is rhe phenomenon that may result in large total and/or diffcienual ground surface seiilemenr and possible lateral ground spreading during an earthquake Liquefaction occurs when loos.0, saturated generally fine sands and silts aie subject TO strong ground shaking The soil loses all slieir sticngih and becomes a viscous liquid foi a short period of rime, and rhcn usually solidifies Settlement of rhe ground surface and failure of foundations caused by liquefaction i^ usually only affecied by the soils thar liquefy within the upper 30 feet, the effect of liquefaction of sodi below this depth is nor usually rnamtesred at rhe giound surface Four conditions usually must be prescnr befoie liquefaction can ocon 1) The soil is below the groundwater table, i e , saturated, 2) Th<_ soil ii. composed predominantly of fine sand and silt, Vi The soil is m a loose to medium dense state, 4) The soil is subject to a sufficient magnitude and duration of strong ground shaking U-is<_d on the .ixailalik infoimanc.n, ir appcirs thar not all of the condition* required for liquefaction are pit-sent it rhe subjcci sue The lexel of anticipated groundshaking from «eismic ncrivrtv is rtktivcly liigh bur the prmnduatci nble is rclanvcly deep and the nauve mntcriflls, at rlu <;irc ,)ppe.n ro be medium dense r'.' dens(. ind ,lte nfu cr:ti^(dcrcd subject, ro liquefaction 2008 12 1" 6194430933 SOIL TESTERS ( \V C 20*0028 01 January 30, 2008 [t \<>u li:u c nm questions ntrcr re.viewing this lerrer picnic do nor hesitate to contact rhis office p;<G£ 04 Rc'-pccrKilh CTIRISTTAN \\T-TELLKR ENGINEERING CinnsR linulcct ( FG #1090 CRBc.b cc (4) Submitted CERTIFIED ENGINEERINGGEOLOGIST 02 '26'2308 12 17 6194436933 SOIL TESTERS E Q F A U L T Version 3 00 DETERMINISTIC ESTIMATION OF PEAK ACCELERATION FROM DIGITIZED FAULTS JOB NUMBER 2080028 DATE 01-30-2009 JOB NAME 2035 Cordoba Place, Carlsbad CALCULATION NAME Test Run Analysis FAULT-DATA- FILE NAME C \Program Filea\EQFAULTl\2002CGSFLTE DAT SITE COORDINATES SITE LATITUDE 33 1487 SITE LONGITUDE 117 3144 SEARCH RADIUS 100 ml ATTENUATTOW RELATION- 2) Boore et al (1997) Honz - NEHRP C (520) UNCERTAINTY (M=Median, S=nSxgma) M Number of Sigmae 0 0 DISTANCE MEASURE cd_2drp SCOND 0 Basement Depth 5 00 km Campbell SSR Campbell SHR COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT-DATA FILE USED C \Program Files\EQFAULTl\2002CGSFLTE DAT MINIMUM DEPTH VALUE (km) 0 0 EQFAULT SUMMARY DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS ABBREVIATED FAULT NAME ROSE CANYON NEWPORT -INGLEWOOD i Off shore) CCRONADO BANK ELSINCRE (TEMECULA) ELSINORE f JULIAN) ST.SINCPC (GLSN TVr) S3JM JOAQUIN HTLLS APPROXIMATE DISTANCE rax (km) 5 7( 91) ESTIMATED MAX EARTHQUAKE EVENT MAXIMUM | PEAK EARTHQUAKE MAG (Mw) 7 2 6 6( 10 7) | 7 ] 2 1 7 ( 350) I 76 23 4 ( 37 7) 23 5 ( 37 8) 34 2 ( 55 1) 36 5( 58 1} 6 8 7 1 SITE ACCEL g 0 315 0 271 0 153 0 095 0 111 SB ! 0 071 6 6 EST S:TE INTENSITY MOD MERC IX IX tf'III VII VII VI 0 074 | VTI '26/2008 12 1"6194430933 SOIL TESTERS PrfGE 06 PALOS VERDES EARTHQUAKE VALLEY 5 AN JACINTO - ANZA SAN JACINTO- SAN JACINTO VALLEY NEWPORT - INGLEWOOD (L A Basin) CHINO -CENTRAL AVE (Elsinore) SAN JACINTO -COYOTE CREEK WtJITTIER FLSINORE (COYOTE MOUNTAIN) SAN JACINTO -SAN BERNARDINO PUENTE HILLS BLIND THRUST SAN JACINTO - BORREGO SAN ANDREAS - San Bernardino M-l SAN ANDREAS - Whole M-la SAN ANDREAS - SB-Coach M-lb-2 SAN ANDREAS - SB -Coach M-2b SAW JOSE CUCAMONGA PINTO MOUNTAIN SIERRA MADRE SAN ANDREAS - Coachella M-lc-5 NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West) BURNT MTN CLEGHORN UPPER ELYS I AN PARK BLIND THRUST EUREKA PEAK SAN ANDREAS - Cho-Mo] M-lb-1 SAN ANDREAS - Mo^ave M-lc-3 SAN ANDREAS - 1857 Rupture M-2a NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East) R A /MONO CLAMSHELL -SAWPIT SUPERSTITION MTN (San Jacinto) VERDUGO ELMORE RANCH HOLLYWOOD SUPERSTITION HILLS (San Jacinto) LANDERS LACUNA SALADA HE LEND ALE - 5 LOCKHARDT SANTA MONICA LEMWOOD-LOCKHART-OLD WOMAN SPRGS MALIBU COAST BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern) EMERSON So - COPPER MTN STERRA MADRE (San Fernando) MORTHRIDGE (E Oak Pidge) SAN GABRTSL ANACAPA-DUME ***» + ** + * + *«rwW****** + »,f,H,**.fr»**,|,1, 37 42 46 46 47 48 51 52 56 60 62 64 65 65 65 65 69 71 71 71 72 74 76 77 78 79 79 79 79 79 80 81 81 83 84 85 85 86 87 88 89 92 93 94 94 95 96 96 98 98 * * * m 3 4 2 9 3 0 3 2 5 1 6 9 6 6 6 6 0 0 5 7 4 8 2 9 1 5 S 5 5 6 2 2 3 4 9 4 9 7 9 2 8 1 1 0 5 4 4 7 2 5 t * ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( 60 68 74 75 76 77 82 84 91 96 100 104 105 105 105 105 111 114 115 115 116 120 122 125 125 127 128 128 128 128 129 130 130 334 136 137 138 339 141 342 144 148 149 151 152 153 155 155 158 158 1) 3) 3) 4) 2) 2) 5)1 0) 0) 8) 7) 5) 6) 6) 6) 6) 0) 2) 0) 4) 5) 4) 6) 3) 7) 9) 0) 0) 0) 1) 1) 6) 8) 3) 6) 5) 3) 6) 4) 0) S) 2) 9) 3) 1) 6) 2) 7) 1) 6) 7 6 7 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 7 6 7 8 7 7 6 6 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 & 7 7 7 6 7 6 6 6 7 6 7 7 7 2 5 2 9 1 7 6 8 8 7 1 6 5 0 7 7 4 9 2 2 2 2 5 5 4 4 8 4 8 7 5 5 6 9 6 4 6 3 0 3 6 5 7 4 7 0 7 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 086 051 | 069 059 | 065 063 047 051 048 043 063 039 062 081 069 069 041 052 049 060 049 053 033 032 037 030 062 051 062 043 038 038 033 046 032 034 031 045 038 044 037 048 038 026 031 036 037 043 039 055 VII VI VI VT VI VI VT VI VT VI VI V VI VTI VI VI V VI vt VI VI VI V V V V VI VT VI vr V V V VI V V v VI V VI V VI V V V V V VI V VI END OF SEARCH- 57 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS THE ROSE CANYON FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE IT TS ABOUT 5 7 MILES (9 1 km) AWAY T.APGEST MAXIMUM-FAFTHOUAKE SITE ACCELERATION 0 3147 g TITLE 24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR Dukes Residence Carlsbad Climate Zone 07 PREPARED FOR Bob Dukes Plans for Dukes Residence have been reviewed The following Title 24 energy report demonstrates compliance with California's Title 24 energy code for new residential projects Mark Gallant, CEA/CEPE, HERs Rater PREPARED BY HAYNAL & COMPANY INC. 508 W Mission Ste 201 Escondido, CA 92025 760-743-5408 October 25, 2007 2005 CODE, Micropas 7.3 C20-LIC#649028, HERs Rater www title-24 com email mark@title-24 com MINIMUM REQUIREMENT SUMMARY: TITLE 24 COMPLIANCE [Project Ceiling Insulation Wall Insulation Floor Insulation Fenestration (Windows) Fenestration (Doors) [Water Heating (or equal) | HVAC System Each of the following specific items, the MF-1R page, and the signed CF-1R pages must be clearly listed on the plans, and provided to the homeowners upon assuming occupancy Heating Efficiency Cooling Efficiency Duct Insulation Thermostat | Heat/Cooling Loads Dukes Residence Carlsbad R30 R13 R19 Dual (Vinyl or Wood) LowE2 Dual (Vinyl or Wood) LowE2 HERS Rater not Required 2005 CODE 10/25/2007 Ufactor=0 39 SHGC=0 35 Ufactor=0 36 SHGC=0 35 40 Gal Gas EF=0 62, Rheem 42VR40, Input=40000, FHR=68 80% AFUE minimum 13 0 SEER minimum R-42 Setback Recommended CFA %/Gls Heat Mm Sensible T Cool CFM Tons 640 309 17458 11970 13766 600 15 I HVAC Recommendations | FAU/AC (or equal) \ Tons] Sensible] Capacity] Input] Rheem RGPN05NAUER Rheem 13AJA-018 1 5 13000 41000 50000 1 8300 Note the UBC requires that the heating system be capable of maintaining a temperature of 70 degrees at three feet above the floor throughout the conditioned space of the residence The recommendations above is based on the attached heating and/or cooling load calculations DHW is based on UPC Table 5-1 THE CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL SIZING OF HEATING, COOLING AND DHW EQUIPMENT MANDATORY MEASURES SUMMARY. RESIDENTIAL (Page 1 of 2) MF-1R Project Title Date Note Low rise residential buildings subject to the Standards must contain these measures regardless of the compliance approach used More stringent compliance requirements from the Certificate of Compliance supersede the items marked with an asterisk (*) below When this checklist is incorporated into the permit documents, the features noted shall be considered by all parties as minimum component performance specifications for the mandatory measures whether they are shown elsewhere in the documents or on this checklist only Instructions Check or initial applicable boxes when completed or check NA if not applicable DESCRIPTION Building Envelope Measures * §150(a) Minimum R 19 in wood frame ceiling insulation or equivalent U factor in metal frame ceiling §150(b) Loose fill insulation manufacturer's labeled R-Value * §150(c) Minimum R-13 wall insulation in wood framed walls or equivalent U-factor in metal frame walls (does not apply to exterior mass walls) * §150(d) Minimum R-13 raised floor insulation m framed floors or equivalent U factor §150(e) Installation of Fireplaces, Decorative Gas Appliances and Gas Logs 1 Masonry and factory-built fireplaces have a closeable metal or glass door covering the entire opening of the firebox b outside air intake with damper and control, flue damper and control 2 No continuous burning gas pilot lights allowed §150(f) Air retarding wrap installed to comply with §151 meets requirements specified in the ACM Residential Manual §150(g) Vapor barriers mandatory in Climate Zones 14 and 16 only §150(1) Slab edge insulation - water absorption rate for the insulation material alone without facings no greater than 0 3%, water vapor permeance rate no greater than 2 0 perm/inch §118 Insulation specified or installed meets insulation installation quality standards Indicate type & include CF-6R Form §116 17 Fenestration Products, Exterior Doors, and Infiltration/Exfiltration Controls 1 Doors and windows between conditioned and unconditioned spaces designed to limit air leakage 2 Fenestration products (except field-fabricated) have label with certified U-factor, certified Solar Heat Gam Coefficient (SHGC), and infiltration certification 3 Exterior doors and windows weatherstripped, all joints and penetrations caulked and sealed Space Conditioning, Water Heating and Plumbing System Measures §1 10 §1 13 HVAC equipment, water heaters, showerheads and faucets certified by the Energy Commission §150(h) Heating and/or cooling loads calculated in accordance with ASHRAE, SMACNA or ACCA §1 50(i) Setback thermostat on all applicable heating and/or cooling systems §150(j) Water system pipe and tank insulation and cooling systems line insulation 1 Storage gas water heaters rated with an Energy Factor less than 0 58 must be externally wrapped with insulation having an installed thermal resistance of R-12 or greater 2 Back up tanks for solar system, unfired storage tanks, or other indirect hot water tanks have R-12 external insulation or R-16 internal insulation and indicated on the exterior of the tank showing the R-value 3 The following piping is insulated according to Table 150 A/B or Equation 150-A Insulation Thickness 1 First 5 feet of hot and cold water pipes closest to water heater tank, non recirculatmg systems, and entire length of recirculatmg sections of hot water pipes shall be insulated to Table 150B 2 Cooling system piping (suction, chilled water, or brine lines), piping insulated between heating source and indirect hot water tank shall be insulated to Table 150-B and Equation 150 A 4 Steam hydronic heating systems or hot water systems >15 psi, meet requirements of Table 123-A NA •/ D 0 D n nnn0 00 n nn n nnnnn 0 Designer S 0n0 0 000n Enforcement ,/ D D D n nnnnn ; nn 0 00 0 00000 D n u na n aanaa D n 0 0 0 n n a a a Residential Compliance Forms March 2005 MANDATORY MEASURES SUMMARY. RESIDENTIAL (Page 2 of 2) MF-1R Space Conditioning, Water Heating and Plumbing System Measures (continued) 5 Insulation must be protected from damage, including that due to sunlight, moisture, equipment maintenance and wind 6 Insulation for chilled water piping and refrigerant suction piping includes a vapor retardant or is enclosed entirely in conditioned space 7 Solar water-heating systems/collectors are certified by the Solar Rating and Certification Corporation *§150(m) Ducts and Fans 1 All ducts and plenums installed, sealed and insulated to meet the requirement of the CMC Sections 601 , 602, 603, 604, 605 and Standard 6-5, supply-air and return-air ducts and plenums are insulated to a minimum installed level of R 4 2 or enclosed entirely in conditioned space Openings shall be sealed with mastic, tape or other duct closure system that meets the applicable requirements of UL 1 81 , UL 1 81 A, or UL 1 81 B or aerosol sealant that meets the requirements of UL 723 If mastic or tape is used to seal openings greater than 1/4 inch, the combination of mastic and either mesh or tape shall be used 2 Building cavities, support platforms for air handlers, and plenums defined or constructed with materials other than sealed sheet metal, duct board or flexible duct shall not be used for conveying conditioned air Building cavities and support platforms may contain ducts Ducts installed in cavities and support platforms shall not be compressed to cause reductions in the cross-sectional area of the ducts 3 Joints and seams of duct systems and their components shall not be sealed with cloth back rubber adhesive duct tapes unless such tape is used in combination with mastic and draw bands 4 Exhaust fan systems have back draft or automatic dampers 5 Gravity ventilating systems serving conditioned space have either automatic or readily accessible, manually operated dampers 6 Protection of Insulation Insulation shall be protected from damage, including that due to sunlight, moisture, equipment maintenance, and wind Cellular foam insulation shall be protected as above or painted with a coating that is water retardant and provides shielding from solar radiation that can cause degradation of the material 7 Flexible ducts cannot have porous inner cores §114 Pool and Spa Heating Systems and Equipment 1 A thermal efficiency that complies with the Appliance Efficiency Regulations, on off switch mounted outside of the heater, weatherproof operating instructions, no electric resistance heating and no pilot light 2 System is installed with a at least 36 of pipe between filter and heater for future solar heating b cover for outdoor pools or outdoor spas 3 Pool system has directional inlets and a circulation pump time switch §115 Gas fired fan-type central furnaces, pool heaters, spa heaters or household cooking appliances have no burning pilot light (Exception Non electrical cooking appliances with pilot < 150 Btu/'hr) §1 18(i) Cool Roof material meets specified criteria Residential Lighting Measures §150(k)1 HIGH EFFICACY LUMINAIRES OTHER THAN OUTDOOR HID contain only high efficacy lamps as outlined Table 150 C, and do not contain a medium screw base socket (E24/E26) Ballast for lamps 13 watts or greater are electronic and have an output frequency no less than 20 kHz §150(k)1 HIGH EFFICACY LUMINAIRES OUTDOOR HID contain only high efficacy lamps as outlined in Table 150-C, hardwired ballasts and if the ballast is electromagnetic has a medium screw base socket §150(k)2 Permanently installed luminaires in kitchens shall be high efficacy lummaires Up to 50 percent of the total rated wattage of permanently installed luminaires (based on nominal rated wattage of high efficacy lamps) in kitchens may be in luminaires that are not high efficacy luminaires, provided that these luminaires are controlled by switches separate from those controlling the high efficacy luminaires §150(k)3 Permanently installed luminaires in bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms utility rooms shall be high efficacy luminaires OR are controlled by an occupant sensor(s) certified to comply with Section 1 1 9(d) that does not turn on automatically or have an always on option §150(k)4 Permanently installed luminaires located other than in kitchens, bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms shall be high efficacy luminaires (except closets less than 70ft2) OR are controlled by a dimmer switch OR are controlled by an occupant sensor that complies with Section 1 19(d) that does not turn on automatically or have an always on option §150(k)5 Luminaires that are recessed into insulated ceilings are approved for zero clearance insulation cover (1C) and are rated to ASTM E283 and labeled as air tight (AT) to less than 2 0 CFM at 75 Pascals §150(k)6 Luminaires providing outdoor lighting and permanently mounted to a residential building or to other buildings on the same lot shall be high efficacy luminaires (not including lighting around swimming pools/water features or other Article 680 locations) OR are controlled by occupant sensors with integral photo control certified to comply with Section 1 1 9(d) §150(k)7 Lighting for parking lots for 8 or more vehicles shall have lighting that complies with Sec 130,132, & 147 Lighting for parking garages for 8 or more vehicles shall have lighting that complies with Sec 130,131, & 146 §150(k)8 Permanently installed lighting in the enclosed, non-dwelling spaces of low-rise residential buildings with four or more dwelling units shall be high efficacy luminaires OR are controlled by occupant sensor(s) certified to comply with Section 1 1 9(d) NA S D 0 0 n n n n0 D n 0 00 0n 0 n n a n D n n 0 0 Designer S 0 D D 0 0 0 0n 0 0 n Enforcement •/ D D n n n n nn n n D n ; nn : nn n 0 n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n n n n n n n n n n a n Residential Compliance Forms March 20G5 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD Dukes ResidenceProject Title Project Address CF-1R Page 1 Date 10/25/07 10 15 45******* *v7 30* Documentation Author Building Permit # Plan Check / Date Carlsbad Mark Gallant, CEPE/HERS ******* Haynal and Company, Inc 508 W Mission Ave Ste 201 Escondido, CA 92025 760-743-5408 Field Check/ Date Climate Zone 07 Compliance Method MICROPAS7 v7 30 for 2005 Standards by Enercomp, Inc | MICROPAS7 v7 30 File-DUKES Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-FORM CF-1R | User#-MP1657 User-Haynal and Company, Inc Run-Typical House = MICROPAS7 ENERGY USE SUMMARY = = Energy Use Standard Proposed Compliance = = (kTDV/sf—yr) Design Design Margin = = Space Heating 7 54 6 38 1 16 = Space Cooling 12 71 16 25 -3 54 = Water Heating 28 22 25 36 2 86 Total 48 47 47 99 0 48 = *** Building complies with Computer Performance *** = GENERAL INFORMATION HERS Verification . Not Required Conditioned Floor Area 640 sf Building Type Single Family Detached Construction Type New Fuel Type . .... NaturalGas Building Front Orientation Front Facing 270 deg (W) Number of Dwelling Units 1 Number of Building Stories 1 Weather Data Type FullYear Floor Construction Type Number of Building Zones Conditioned Volume Slab-On-Grade Area Glazing Percentage Average Glazing U-factor Average Glazing SHGC Average Ceiling Height Raised Floor 1 5120 cf 0 sf 30 9 % of floor area 0 37 Btu/hr-sf-F 0 35 8 ft CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 2 Project Title Dukes Residence Date 10/25/07 10 15 45 MICROPAS7 v7 30 File-DUKES Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-FORM CF-1R User#-MP1657 User-Haynal and Company, Inc Run-Typical House BUILDING ZONE INFORMATION Zone Res: Type idence Floor Area (sf) 640 Volume (cf) 5120 # of Dwell Units 1 00 # of Peop- le 5 0 Cond- it- ioned Yes Thermo- stat Type Setback Vent Height (ft) 2 0 Vent Area (sf) Standard Verifiec Leakage Housewrj No i or IP Surface OPAQUE SURFACES U— Sheath— Solar Appendix Frame Area fact- Cavity ing Act Gains IV Location/ Type (sf) or R-val R-val Azm Tilt Reference Comments 1 Wall 2 Wall 3 Wall 4 Wall 5 Roof 6 FloorExt 7 Door Wood Wood Wood Wood Wood Wood Other 227 145 214 61 640 640 20 0 102 0 102 0 102 0 102 0 032 0 048 0 500 13 13 13 13 30 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 270 0 90 180 n/a n/a 90 90 90 90 90 0 0 90 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes IV IV IV IV IV IV IV 9 A3 9 A3 9 A3 9 A3 1 A7 20 A4 28 A4 To Garage Entry Door FENESTRATION SURFACES Orientation 1 Wind 2 Wind 3 Door 4 Wind 5 Wind 6 Wind Front Front Right Back Left Left (W) (W) (S) (E) (N) (N) Area (sf) 7 30 106 30 16 7 5 0 7 0 0 5 U- factor SHGC 0 0 0 0 0 0 390 390 360 390 390 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 350 350 350 350 350 Act Azm 270 270 180 90 0 0 Tilt 90 90 90 90 90 90 Exterior Shade Type Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Standard Location /Comments F 2630 F 6050 R 16068 B 6050 L 4040 L 2630 OVERHANGS — iJT nrlf Area Left Right Surface (sf) Width Height Depth Height Extension Extension 1 Window 2 Window 4 Window 7 5 n/a 3 30 0 n/a 5 30 0 n/a 5 15 1 15 1 15 1 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 3 Pro]ect Title Dukes Residence Date 10/25/07 10 15 45 I MICROPAS7 v7 30 File-DUKES Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-FORM CF-1R | I User#-MP1657 User-Haynal and Company, Inc Run-Typical House | HVAC SYSTEMS Verified Number Verified Verified Verified Verified Maximum System of Minimum Refrig Charge Adequate Fan Watt Cooling Type Systems Efficiency EER or TXV Airflow Draw Capacity Furnace 1 0 800 AFUE n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a ACSplit 1 13 00 SEER No No No No No HVAC SIZING Verified Total Sensible Design Maximum Heating Cooling Cooling Cooling System Load Load Capacity Capacity Type (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) (Btu/hr) Furnace 11058 n/a n/a n/a ACSplit n/a 11970 13809 n/a Sizing Location Winter Outside Design Winter Inside Design Summer Outside Design Summer Inside Design Summer Range CARLSBAD 38 F 70 F 88 F 75 F 10 F System Type Duct Location DUCT SYSTEMS Verified Verified Verified Duct Duct Surface Buried R-value Leakage Area Ducts Furnace ACSplit Attic Attic R-4 2 R-4 2 No No No No No No WATER HEATING SYSTEMS Tank Type 1 Storage Heater Type Distribution Type Number Tank in Energy Size System Factor (gal) External Insulation R-value Gas Standard 0 62 40 R- n/a CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE RESIDENTIAL COMPUTER METHOD CF-1R Page 4 Project Title Dukes Residence Date 10/25/07 10 15 45 | MICROPAS7 v7 30 File-DUKES Wth-CTZ07S05 Program-FORM CF-1R | I User#-MP1657 User-Haynal and Company, Inc Run-Typical House | REMARKS COMPLIANCE STATEMENT This certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications needed to comply with Title-24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations, and the administrative regulations to implement them This certificate has been signed by the individual with overall design responsibility DESIGNER or OWNER DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR Name Name Mark Gallant, CEPE/HERS Company Bob Dukes Company Haynal and Company, Inc Address Address 508 W Mission Ave Ste 201 Escondido, CA 92025 Phone Phone 760-743-5408 License Signed Signed _ ' 'cL/""*™ 10-25-200V (date) \f\/^\ (date) ENFORCEMENT AGENCY Name Title Agency Phone Signed (date) FURY* GAS WATER HEATERS 6-year limited tank and parts warranty See residential warranty information brochure for complete warranty information Upgrade your warranty with... YEAR LIMITEDTANK WARR.ANTYBECOMES / GUARDIAN SYSTEM For more details, see form 101 7 BestReputafton SupenorTechnology. Guardian System™ • One-of-a-kmd air/fuel shut-off device offers double protection • Maintenance free - no fikei to clean • Standard replacement parts Environmentally Friendly Burner « Low NOx design for low nitrous oxide emissions Self-Cleaning « EverKleen™ patented system fights sediment build-up « Reduces fuel costs « Piovides more hot water Easy to Light • No matches required Energy Efficient • Moreliot water at low operating cost High Altitude Compliant • ATI models are certified for applications up to 6,000 feet above sea level Longer Life • Patented magnesium anode lod design mcorpoiates a special resistor that protects the. lank from rust Plus... • Brass drain valve and temperature and pressuie relief valve, are included • Meets or exceeds National Appliance Energy Conservation Act (NAECA) requirements High Efficiency Modek Feature: • High performance and iccovery • R-Foam® insulation process wnh approx R-yalue of R-20: - • Compliant with many gas utility incentive programs DESCRIPTION ROUGHING IN DIMENSIONS (SHOWN IN INCHES) GASUfL!TIN RECOVERY*! RHSTHOUB I HT.TO THOUS. rrU/HR. I Gf.H.SO'RISE I DELG.P.H I VENT HT.TO GAS DUM. CONN.I- WATERCONN.CNTR. ENERGY INFO. ENERGY AVG-ANN , FACTOR OPER.COST) E I CAP. UODCLNUtaER 1 NAT. 1 If TAtL T A t L sH ? 40 50 30 40 50 50 30 40 42VR40-40F , :. 42VR50-40F , 22V30 30F 42V40 40F 42V50-40F 42V50 50F 22V30S 30F 42V40S-40F 40 40 30 40 40 50 30 40 34 36 27 34 36 - - 36 •,'!.»• 404 404 303 404 •404 506 303 404 If NAT. 1 A 1 C D E F G H I (LlS) 1 NAT. NAT. 34-3 -364 273 343 364 - - 364 "68, . "••, 83 53 70 83 83 50 70 631/4 62 1/4 601/4 621/2 61 1/2 62 493/4 53 59-3/4. 583/4 57 59 58 58 461/4 49 1/2 21 „ :'" 23 173/4 193/4 21 3/4 213/4 193/4 21 3/4 14 1/2. 14-1/2 14 1/2 14 1/2 14 1/2 14 1/2 14 1/2 14 1/2 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 ..-.'8 • 8 ': 8 8 8 8 8 8 531/2- 52 1/2 51 1/4 531/2 52 1/2 52 1/2 40 1/4 44 3/4 / 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 35 ",'65 101 ISO 150 150 98 133 062 , 062 061 059 058 058 061 059 $146 , -$146 $147 $152 $155 $155 $147 S152 SPECIFY LP GAS WHEN ORDERING Add' P" suffix to the model number Example 42VR40-40PF For high altitude applications of 6 000 to 10,000 feet above sea level, add 'H suffix to the model number Example 42VR50-40HF (available in 40 and 50 gallon models) These units are designed to meet or exceed ANSI (American National Standards Institute) requirements and have been test ed according to DO E test proce duies and meet or exceed the energy elliciency requirements of NAECA ASHRAE standard 90, BOCA Code and all state energy efficiency performance criteria for energy consuming appliances Before purchasing this appliance read Important energy cost and efficiency information available from your supplier In keeping with Its policy ot continuous progress and product Improvement, Rheem reserves the right to make changes without notice Rheem Guardian System Features... ANODE ROD HCOLDWATER ! CONNECTION Exclusive Combustion Shut-off System Should a spill incident occur, the Guardian System shuts off the gas supply and the air supply preventing a sustained vapor bum m the combustion chamber Flame Arrester Plate A specially-designed flame arrester pre- vents ignition of vapors outside the combustion chamber Maintenance Free Superior air filtrauon prevents the flame, arrester from becom- ing clogged by lint, dust and oil There Is No Equal.11 Rheem Water Heaters • 101 Bell Road, Montgomery, Alabama 36117-4305 • www rheem com PRINTED IN U S A 101 6 REV 3 FORM NO G 11-485 REV 5 Supersedes Form No G11-485 Rev 4 RGPN- SERIES Models with Input Rates from 50,000 to 150,000 BTU/HR [15 to 44 kW] (U.S. & Canadian Models) ' - " ;,ISO 9001:2000 '•"'•' msmber ® gama CLASSIC SERIES SUPER QUIET 80 80.0% A.F.U.E.f UPFLOW/ HORIZONTAL GAS FURNACES The Rheem Classic Series'" Super Quiet 80 line of upi low/hori- zontal gas furnaces are designed for utility rooms, closets, alcoves, or attics Because of the Super Quiet 80's low-profile 34 inch [864 mm] height, the upflow model can also be used to satisfy most applications that traditionally call fcr a hori- zontal furnace The design is certified by CSA International Features • Innovative combustion design results in reliable, efficient operation at sound levels which provide distinct competitive advantage • Patented Heat Exchanger, constructed of both stainless and aluminized steel for the maximum in corrosion resistance • Low profile "34 inch" design is lighter and easier to handle and leaves room for optional equipment • Convertible from upflow to horizontal left or right without field conversion • Left or right side gas and electric inlet connections with quick, simple change • Robust and reliable direct spark ignition utilizing remote sense and an integrated board with humidifier and electronic air cleaner hookups • Insulated blower compartment helps to reduce jacket loss and noise • Pre paint galvanized steel cabinet • Molded permanent filter • Grab holes in doors to aid in easy door removal and replacement A variety of cooling coils and plenums designed to use with Rheem Classic Series'1 Super Quiet 80 gas furnaces are avail- able as optional accessories These furnaces can be installed in an upflow position or laid on either side in a horizontal position Field conversion not required •tA FU E (Annual Fuel Ulilization Efficiency) calculated in accordance wilh Dspnnment o' m Energy test procedures M BEFORE PURCHASING THIS APPLIANCE, READ IMPORTANT ENERGY COST AND EFFICIENCY INFORMATION AVAILABLE FROM YOUR RETAILER PHYSICAL DATA AND SPECIFICATIONS U.S. AND CANADA MODELS (UPFLOW/HORIIZONTAL) MODEL NUMBERS RGPN SERIES Input BTU/Hi |kW] '.• Heating Capacity BTU/Hr [kW] ('•• High Altitude Input [kW] High Altitude Output Capacity |kW]* Heat Ext Static Pressure [kPa] Blower (Dx W) |mm] Motor HP-Speeds- PSC Type |W] Motor Full Load Amps Heating Speed Cooling Speed Cooling CFM & 5 [kPa] E S P (Nominal) [L/s] Rated ESP (In WC)[kPa] Temperature Rise Range °F l°C] Max Outlet Air Temp °F [°C] Standard Filter-In [mm] Appiox Shipping Weight (Lbs ) [kg] Return Air Cabinets (Opt ) RXGR filler Size [mm] AFUE-Elcctnc Ignition Models 0: 05EAUER 05NAUER 50 000 [15] 41 000 [12] 45000(13] 36 500 [11] 10|025] 11x6 [279x152] 1/2 4 PSC [373] 68 MED LOW HIGH 1200 [566] 05(12] 25-55 [139-306] 155 [683] 153/025 [400 x 635] 8b [39] C146 (2)12x16 [305x406] 80 0% 07EAMER 07NAMER 75,000 [22] 60 000 [ 18] 67 500 [20] 53500(16) 12(029] 11 x7 (279x178] '/2 4 PSC [373] 71 MED-HIGH HIGH | 1200 [566] 05 [12] I 35-65 [194-361] 165 [738] 153/4x25 [400x635] 105 [48] C17B (2)12x16 [305x406] 80 0% 07EAMGR 07NAMGR 75000(22] 60,000 [18] 67,500 [20] 54,000(16] 12 [029] 11 x7 [279x178] 3/4 4 PSC [559] 95 MED LOW MED HIGH 1600 [755] 05(12] 2555 [139306] 155 [683] 153/4x25 [400x635] 105 [48] C17B (2) 12x16 [305 x 406] 80 0% 10EAMER 10NAMER , 100,000(29] 80000(234] 90,000 |26] 72000(21] 15(037] 11 x7 (279x178] V2 4 PSC [373] 7 i MED HIGH HIGH 1200 [560] 05[ 12] 45-,'5 [25041 7] 190 [877] 153/4 <25 [400x635] m [52] C17B (2)12x16 [305x406] 80 0% 10EBRJR . 10NBRJR 100000(29] 81 000(237] 90,000(26] 72,500(21] 15(037] 11 x10 [279x254] 3/4 4-PSC [559] 95 MEO-LOW MED-HIGH 2000 (944] 05 [12] 4070 [22 2-38 9] 170 [766] 19V4X25 [489 x 635] 120 [54] C21B (2)20x16 [508x406] 80 0% 12EARJR 12NARJR 125000(37] 99 000 (29) 112 500 [33] 89,000(261] 20 [ 05] 11 x10 [279x254] 3/4 4 PSC [559] 95 MED LOW MED HIGH 2000 (944] 05 [12] 3565 [194361] 180 [822] 223/4 x 25 [578x635] 140 [63] C24B (2)24x16 [610x406] 80 0% 15EARJR 15NARJR 150 000 [44] 119 000 [35] 135,000(396] 107500[31 5] 20 [ 05] 11 x10 [279x254] % 4 PSC [559] 95 , MED LOW MED HIGH 2000 [944] 05 [12] 50-80 [278444] 190 [877] 223/4 x 25 [578 x 635] 150 [68] C24B (2)24x16 [610x406] 80 0% NOTES All models are 115V 60HZ 10 Gas connection we for all models is '/2 [12 7 mm] MPT '.)•• In accordance with DOE test procedures '•:: See Conversion Kit Index Form (or high altitude derate in U S applications For Canadian applications reference the furnace installation instructions • Data references Canadian apphcations only IVIODEL IDENTIFICATION—UPFLOW MODELS N —07E Rheem Gas Llpflow/ Design Furnace Horizontal Series Heating Input Designation Variations Blower Heating & Cooling Electric Ignition 05E 07E 10E 12E 15E NOx Model 05N 07IM 10N 12N 15N Input BTU/HR 50,000 [1 5 kW] 75,000 [22 kW] 100,000 [29 kW] 125.000 [37 kW] 150 000 [44 kW] A = Std Cabinet B = Wide Cabinet U M R Designation = 11 x6 [279 x 152 mm] = 11x7 [279x178 mm] = 11 x10 [279 x 254 mm] S E G J Designation = 500 1200 CFM = 1100 1330 CFM [519 628 L/s] = 1450 1750 CFM [684-826 L/s] = 1800 2075 CFM [850-979 L/s] Fuel Type R = Natural Gas U S and Canadian Standard Furnace [ ] Designates Metric Conversions Rheem Manufacturing Company FORM NO A11-182REV 1 Supersedes Form No A11 182 Full Metal Jacket Corner Post/Mesh 13AJA SERIES Manufactured by Heating And Cooling The World ?ISO 9001:2000 LISTED SERIES 13 SEER CONDENSING UNITS Features • Choose between painted louvered steel cabinet or mesh wrap • Easily accessible control box • Condenser coils constructed with copper tubing and enhanced aluminum fins • Grille/Motor mount for quiet fan operation Applications Outdoor condensing unit designed for ground level or rooftop installations These units offer comfort and depend- ability for single, multi-family and light commercial applications Accessories Low Pressure Control (RXAC-A03) High Pressure Control (RXAB-A03) Low Ambient Control (RXAD-A04) Compressor Time Delay Control Crankcase Heater Sound Enclosure Filter Drier CERTIFIED UNDER THE A R I CERTIFICATION PROGRAM—A R I STANDARD 210 Model Number Identification 13 A J 13 SEER A = AIR CONDITIONER VOL1AGE J = 208 230 SINGLE PHASE A DESIGN SERIES A = 1ST DESIGN 18 NOMINAL COOLING 18 24 30 3fa 42 48 60 = 18000BTU/HR = 24 000 BTU/HR - 30 000 BTU/HR - 36 000 BTU/HR -- 42 000 BTU/HR -48 000 BTU/HR •- 60 000 BTU/HR A 01' CAPACITY CABlNlfl CUR.SAIM [528kWj A- FULL MC1AL JACKEI (7 03 kW] B = CORNER POST W/MESH !879kW] |i055kW| 1 12 31 kW] ii.107kWj |i758kW] Performance Data @ API Standard Conditions—Cooling Model Numbers Outdoor Unit 13AJA 018 024 Indoor Coil and/or Air Handler RCBA24-+RXCT-BCA RCBA-24' +RXCT-BHA RCFA A'2414A' RCFA A-2417A' RCFA-H'2414A' RCFA-H'2417A-<1: RCGA-24A1 RCHA-24A1 RCHJ-24A1 RCQC 241 7A RCTA A024 RCTB-A024 TCBA 24"-rRXCTBCA TCBA-24"+RXCT-BHA RCBA 24'NRXCT BCA(14AH C01) RCBA-24 ' -rRXCT-BHA (1 4AH C01 ) RCGA 24A1 (14AH ' C01) 80°F [26 5°C] DB/67'F [19 5°CJ WB Indoor Air 95T [35°C] DB Outdoor Air Total Capacity BTU/H [kWJ 16700(49] 16, 700 [4 9] 18 300 [5 4] 18,300 [5 4] 18300[54] 18,300(54] 16,700(49] 16700(49] 17400(51] 18400(54] 16700(49] 17800|52] 16 700 [4 9] Net Sensible BTU/H |kW] Net Latent BTU/H ikW] 11350[33] 5350|16] 11 350)33] 13000(38' 13000 [38] 5350[1 6] 5300(16] 5 300 [16] 13000)38] ! 5300)16) 13000)38] 11 350)33] 11 350 [3 3] 11950)35] 13300)39] 11 650|34] 5300[1 6] 5350(1 6] 5,350 (1 6] 5450[1 6] EER 1085 1085 11 70 11 70 1 1 70 11 70 1085 1085 11 15 5 100(1 5] T~ 11 70 5050(15] I 1080 13150(39] i 4 650 [14] 1135 11350(33] 5350)16] 1085 16700(49] | 11350(33) 5350|!6| 16 700 [4 9] 11400(33] 1 5 SOU [16] 1085 ~1090 16700(49] 11400|33] 5300J16] 10 SO 16700 [49] RCHA 24A1 (14AH •' 'C01J 16700|49] RCSAH 241 7A- (17AHLA24HM) RCSA-A 2417A" (17AHSA18AU) RCSA-H 2417A (17AHSA18HM) 18800(55] 18500(54] 18500 [54] RCGJ 24A1 (RBHK 17) 18000153] RCHJ 24A1 (RBHK 17) 18 000 [5 3] RCSA-H-2417A' (RHLA HM2417) 18 800 [5 5] RCSA-H-2417A' (RHSA-HM1817) RCBA 24" + RXCT-BCB RCBA-24-+RXCTCHB RCFA A-2414A' RCFA-A'2417A' RCFA-H-2414A' RCFA-H'2417A"Ci RCGA-24A2 RCHA 24A2 RCHJ 24A2 RCOC2417A RCTA A024 RCTH A024 TCBA-24 '+RXCT-BCB 18500(54] 21400(63] 21400(63] 23400(69] 23400(69] 23,400 [6 9] 23,400(69] 21,400(63] 21 400(63] 22 400 [6 6! 11400)33]5,300(16] • 1090 11400[33] j 5300)16] 13350)39] 13l50[39] 13 150)39] 12500(37] 12500(37] 13350 |39j 5450[1 6] 5 350 [1 6] 5350(1 6] 5500(1 6] 5 500 [ 1 6] 5450[1 6; 13 150 [3 9] 5350J16J 14300[42] 14300(42] 16350(48] 16350(48] 16350(48] 16,350(48] 14.300(4 2] 14300(42] 7100(21] 7100(21] 7050(2 1] 7,050(21] I 7 050 [21] 1 7050J21J 7100(21] 7100[21] 1090 13 10 1220 1220 12 95 1 1295 I 1310 1220 1075 1075 11 55 11 55 11 55 11 55 1075 Ql075 15 150 |4 4] 7250 [21] 11 10 23400169]"" 16800|49i ' 6600119] r 50 SEER , 12 15 12 15 1300 r 1300 13 00 1300 1215 1215 1250 1310 1215 :275 12 15 ^'1215" 12 Ib 12 Ib 12 15 ..? :'o 1400 Indoor CFM [L/s] 600 [283| 600 [2831 COO [283! 600 28 ij GOO ••'?.-.' 600 [283] 600 J26J] 600 [283i 600 |283i 600(283] 600 2«:;i 60G!2c3| 60012831 bOi: 2tU 600 283: ! 600 |2S-( COO [283) GOO:??;'.: 600 [2831 1300 i 600; 283! 1300 600 [283] 1300 1300 14 00 1300 12 40 1240 1300 1300 1300 1300 1240 1240 1265 •Vi(i 21 400 [63] | 14 650 |4 3j j 6 750 (2 0] ~j 10 7b ; '.? 40 22 800 [6 7] ! 16 850 [4 9| '' 5 950! 17] '; ' 1 30 ! 1280 21 400 16" 3] i 14300)42; 7100|21j 1075 j 1240 TCBA 24 +RXCT CHB 21 400 16 3] ' 1-1300,42; ' 7100|2l| 10 "b ! 1240 otlO JJ83J 600 J283] bOiJi^Soj 600|283] 800 378] 800 1378] fiOO |378j 800(378! 8001378] 800|3/8| 800)3781 800 '378: 1 oOO!378i 3001 'To: 800|378j HOCI3/B! 800 J378] 30GI37S, 'I- Highest sales volume tested combination required t>v D 0 E test procedures [ ] Designates Metric Conversions ICECO City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form Project Name Building Permit Plan Check Number Project Address APN Project Applicant (Owner Name) Project Description Building Type Residential Second Dwelling Unit Residential Additions Commercial/Industrial City Certification of Applicant Information DUKES RESIDENCE CB071650 2035 CORDOBA PLACE 207-240-37-00 DUKES RESIDENCE - 2ND DWELLING UNIT V-N 1 New Dwelling Units 640 Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Net Square Feet New Area xSqjjare Feet Floor Area Date SCHO TRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School El Catnmo Real clsbad CA 92009 (33 USf)00) trict Vista Unified School District 1234 Arcadia Drive Vista CA 92083 (726-2170) San Marcos Unified School District 215 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Contact Nancy Dolce (By Appt Only) Encimtas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encimtas, CA 92024 (944-4300 c\t 166) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encimtas Blvd Encimtas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner Signature Revised 3/30/2006 Date SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school distnct(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District The City may issue building permits for this project SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE WALTER FREEMANASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT NAME OF SCHOOL D,STR,CT ^m^JS^P1001-131™016225 EL CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD, CA DATE PHONE NUMBER Revised 3/30/2006 I I CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT j | JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY ( (AVIARA OAKS ELEMENTARY \ | CARLSBAD HIGH SCHOOL \ \ MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY \ \ AVIARA OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL | | CARLSBAD VILLAGE ACADEMY \ \ CALAVERA HILLS SCHOOL \ \ PACIFIC RIM | | VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL \ \ KELLEY SCHOOL \ \ CALAVERA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL | | BUENA VISTA SCHOOL [ ] HOPE SCHOOL | [ OTHER Receipt No 25896 RECEIVED FROM (If Applicable) PARENT OF DATE _•: PAYMENT FOR ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT RECEIVED BY