The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2359 CARLSBAD BLVD; PUMP STA; CB900464; PermitBUILDING PERMIT12/06/91 14:57 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2359 CARLSBAD BL $tr: Permit Type: COMMERCIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENT Parcel No: 155-200-03-00 Valuation: • o Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: B4 Class Code: Description: SEWAGE PUMP STATION AND : FORCE MAIN. CITY PROJ 3299 Permit No: CB900464 Project No: A9000564 Development No: Fl: Ste: Appl/Ownr : KEN QUON/CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 LAS PALMAS DR CARLSBAD,CA 92009 438-1161 Status: ISSUED Applied: 03/21/90 Apr/Issue: 12/06/91 Validated By: CD OWNER CONTRACTOR * A* KEN QUON CIT 2075 LAS P CARLSBAD PACIFIC PO BX 40 CONCORD Fees Requires .OWNER Fees : Adjustments: Total Fees: Fee description Enter "Y" for Plumbi Enter "Y" for Electri Enter 'Y' for Mechanic 20 438-1161 720 3331 (619) Credits AAA ,00 . 00 , 00 Ext fee Data - — ,___^_ „ ___„— N N N CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 cRMlT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-iiei 1. PERMIT TYPE A - [^COMMERCIAL [JNEW QTENANT IMPROVEMENT B -^INDUSTRIAL K)(lEW QTENANT IMPROVEMENT c - PRESIDENTIAL QAPARTMENT QCONDO QSINGLE FAMILY DUELLING ODUPLEX QDEMOLITION n^ELocATioN QMOSILE HOME QELECTRICAL QMECHANICAL DPOOL DSPA DETAINING WALL flsoLAR nOTHER EST. VAL A/9 1~<eg^ FLAW CK DEPOSIT VALID. BY DATE Q PLUMBING 2. PROJECT INFORMATION PLAN CHECK No.FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 2359 Carlsbad Boulevard Mountain VlBW DH VPNearest Cross Streets LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. CHECK BELOW IF SUBMITTED: C~l2 Energy Calcs |Jf]2 Structural Calcs ASSESSOR'S PARCEL 155_200-03 QQ 2 Soils Report Cl 1 Addressed Envelope EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE DESCTIPTIoH OF UOBK Construction of Home Plant Sewage Pump Station and Force Main - City Project No. 3299 BLDG. SO. FTG. 3.CONTACT PERSON WE Kenneth W. Quon "r Carlsbad STATE ZIPCCOE OAT TELEPHONE (gjg) 438-U61 SIGNATURE 4. APPLICANT DETRACTOR NAME City of Carlsbad CITy 5. PROPERTY OWNER NAME City of Carlsbad CITY D AGENT STATE OWNER STATE FOR CONTRACTOR DOWNER ADDRESS ZIP CODE ADDRESS ZIP CODE Q AGENT FOR DUNEB DAY TELEPHONE QLESSEE QTENANT DAY TELEPHONE 6. CONTRACTORNAME Pacific Mechanical Corp cur Concord ADDRESS p 0 STATE CAzipcODE 94524 DAY TELEPHONE (619) 720~9331 STATE LIC. # 1^ftQ?n LICENSE CLASS A CITY BUSINESS L1C. # 119o319 tX P . 8/92Dave Backman SIGNATURE 7. DESIGNER NAME CITY WORKERS Will iam Koptionak San Dieao ' COMPENSATION TITLE Project Mngr DATE . ADDRESS gggg Hlbert Streetj Su1te 1Q2 STATE CA 2lt> CODE Q?l^l DAY TELEPHONE ffi!9^ Sfifi-^Q?? STATE LIC. # C 14513 Workers' Compensation Declaration: 1 hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an enact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO.EXPIRATION DATE Certi f icate of Exempt i on: 1 cert i fy that in the performance of the work for which this permi t is i ssued, I shal I not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE 8. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Owner-BuiIder Declaration: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I as owner of the property or rny employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not interred or offered for sale {Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon,, and who does such uork himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold uithin one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). Business and Professions Code for this reason; (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, conmencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant tor a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [1500]). SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENT !AL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: IE the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 35505, 255J3 or 25534 of the Presley- Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DVES X]"° Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from trie air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES £]NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? IF ANY OF THE ANSUEftS ARE YES, A F[HAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS 1F THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION COMTROL DISTRICT- 9. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 10. APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH KAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended Or abandoned at any lime after the gork is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code). [J] OWNER GCONTRACTOR PHONE APPROVED BY; DATE: WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance & * 9"*?DATE & * "- INSPECTOR PERMIT # PLANCK #, JOB ADDRESS £>S>*£T? C*€*&m TIME ARRIVE: TIME LEAVE: CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS PERMITS 6/15/89 UNSCHEDVLED INSPECTION DATE ^ -O rg ^ INSPECTOR PERMIT #PLANCK # JOB ADDRESS TIME ARRIVE: TIME LEAVE: CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS PERMITS 6/15/89 CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT* CB900464 FOR 06/02/92 DESCRIPTION: SEWAGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN. CITY PROJ 3299 TYPE: CTI JOB ADDRESS: 2359 CARLSBAD BL KEN QUON/CITY OF CARLSBAD PHONE: PACIFIC MECHANICAL CORP PHONE: KEN QUON CITY OF CARLSBAD, PHONE: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: STR: 438-1161 720 9331 438-1161 INSPECTOR AREA PK PLANCKf CB900464 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW FL: STE: REMARKS: MH/CHRIS/720-9331 INSPECTOR SPECIAL INSTRUCT: SDGE 6/5 - COURTESY BY CITY 6/2? TOTAL TIME: CD LVL DESCRIPTION 33 EL Service Change/Upgrade ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION 051492 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 050192 Grout 043092 Grout 042492 Rough Electric 042492 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042392 Rough Electric 042292 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 042292 Steel/Bond Beam 042292 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 042092 Underground/Conduit-Wiring 040992 Footing 020592 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 012392 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011592 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011492 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 011492 Rough Electric 010792 Steel/Bond Beam 010792 Steel/Bond Beam 122091 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 121991 Compliance Investigation 121791 Steel/Bond Beam 121691 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 121691 Rough Electric ACT AP AP NR AP AP NS PA PA CO CA AP AP AP AP PA PA PA PA DN NR NR PA PA INSP PK MP MP MP MP PK PK PK PK PK PK TP PK PK PK PK MFC MPC MP PK PK PK PK COMMENTS ROOF DECK REBAR GEN ROOM OK TO GROUT GEN RM FOUND OK TO POUR RESCHEDULE 4-23-92 SEE NOTICE 4-22-92 PER CHRIS ON 4/17/92 ISOLATION FOOTING ROOF (DECK) STEEL DECK OVER WET WELL WALLS @ COMMINUTOR ROOM MTR ROOM DECK CONDUIT IN DECK VRTX WALLS,MTR RM DCK WET WELL WEDGE BTTM SEE INSP NOTES SEE INSP NOTES WALLS ON WEST SIDE/PUMP STA CORRECTION NOTICE ADDRESS: D APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE ON JOB SITE BUILDING D FOUNDATION D REINFORCING STEEL D MASONRY D GROUT-GUNITE D FLOOR AND CEILING FRAME D SHEATHING D FRAME n EXTERIOR LATH D INSULATION D INTERIOR LATH OR DRYWALL PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND PLUMBING D UNDERGROUND WATER D ROUGH PLUMBING D TOP OUT PLUMBING D SEWER AND PL/CO. D TUB OR SHOWER PAN D GAS TEST D WATER HEATER ELECTRICAL D TEMPORARY SERVICE D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND D ROUGH ELECTRIC D POOL BONDING D ELECTRIC SERVICE D UFER GROUND a G.F.I. n SMOKE DETECTOR •hdn^z* (Q#/JM -—j MISCELLANEOUS D PLENUM AND DUCTS D COMBUSTION AIR D CONDITIONED AIR SYSTEMS D SOLAR D GRADING D POOL n PATIO D SIGN D OTHER WRITE IT - DON'T SAY IT! To //&'/' /\ . Date 19 From Q Reply Wanted GNo Reply Necessary PRINTED IN US* INSPECTION DATE so.^^ — INSPECTOR PERMIT #PLANCK # JOB ADDRESS &*>* TIME ARRIVE:TIME LEAVE: CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS **Je^e-V^7 -fy^/- -fu^ &L.M?\<; &h- c^e^e ^c ^^-^ •^^-/ ^->^<_ /^T—; PERMITS 6/15/89 PROJECT MEMO CITY OF CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO: FROM SALVATOREJ.GUIDA CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPT (519) 438-1161 FXl^O is 9/ PROJECT/PERMIT NO SUBJECT: .- r ., Engineer/Apting Agent1 O^&Awi&^ptGte^ $ WHITE/ Job Site; YELLOW - File; PINK - Inspector STOP WORK City of Carlsbad - State of California Office of City Engineer NOTICE This site has been inspected and is deficient in the following area(s): D Erosion Control D Drainage Structures Cl Sewer Lines D Water Lines D Trenching and Backfilling O Asphalt Concrete D Concrete Work D No Permit D Traffic Control D Improper J-irading jifother $£'/£l)//l^ /3nt ^fc-££V ^L/ --' Please correct as nPlease^corT^ct as^tib^d before any further work below is done. ALL BUNDING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INSPECTIONS WILL STOP UNTIL THIS NOTICE IS SIGNED OFF. DO NOT REMOVE THIS DETACH and Bring this Portion of Card lo City Hail. No work can resume until this card has been signed-off by the City Engineer. Location OF CITY ENGINEER - CITY OF CARLSBAD OITkc nl Citj f.ns-iiwi-i -- Cii>' u(' C RED. iuf> Silu PINK: fi*i(Wing WHITK: DATE VygCHEDVPEP INSPECTION - /?-?/ INSPECTOR PERMIT # JOB ADDRESS { j*e&s PLANCK # TIME ARRIVE:TIME LEAVE: CD LVL DESCRIPTION PERMITS 6/15/89 ACT COMMENTS PROJECT MEMO CITY OF CARLSBAD - ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TO:fcLLY FROM: DATE: /*?'/#><?/ 19 TlME: X- ' PROJECT/PERMIT NO rr 'T-/ Oflf n\ &P -tk* io&sK. . 4v Load ~fi?r ir*? ty Engineer/Acting Agerff/ WHITE - Job Site; YELLOW - File; PINK - Inspector CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT! CB900464 FOR 12/17/91 DESCRIPTION: SEWAGE PUMP STATION AND FORCE MAIN. CITY PROJ 3299 TYPE: CTI JOB ADDRESS: 2359 CARLSBAD BL KEN QUON/CITY OF CARLSBAD PHONE: PACIFIC MECHANICAL CORP PHONE: KEN QUON CITY OF CARLSBAD, PHONE: APPLICANT: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: MH/CHRIS/720-9331 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: STR: 438-1161 720 9331, 438-116! INSPECTOR INSPECTOR AREA PK PLANCK# CB900464 OCC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW FL: STE: (619) TOTAL TIME: CD LVL DESCRIPTION 12 ST Steel/Bond Beam ACT COMMENTS sZ4&st*J> DATE DESCRIPTION ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** ACT INSP COMMENTS «%7/' *#**/77: fc SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92160 (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO, CA. 92025, (619) 746-4544 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT FILE NUMBER 9121088 PROJECT TITLE Home Plant Pump Station PROJECT LOCATION 2359 Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad ARCHITECT ENGINEER DATE: May 20, 1992 CONCRETE 1ASTM C39) MORTAR (UBC 24-22) GROUT(ASTMC1019) PRISMS (ASTM E447) CONTRACTOR Pacific Mechanical Corp. PERMIT No. PLAN FILE No. n LOCATION IN STRUCTURE Generator Building - roof slab MATERIAL SUPPLIER Nelson & Sloan ADMIXTURE(S) MIX DESIGNATION 89-141 TIME IN MIXER, MINUTES 42 SLUMP, INCHES 3-1/2 SAMPLES FABRICATED BY SA SAMPLES TESTED BY DRB TRUCK No. 363 TICKET No. 384277 LABORATORY No. MARK A DATE MADE DATE RECEIVED DATE TESTED DIAMETER, INCHES AREA. SQUARE INCHES MAXIMUM LOAD, LBS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PSI AGE TESTED, DAYS REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, PSI UNIT WT./CU. FT. (PLASTIC) 2721 05-15-92 05-18-92 05-20-92 6.00 28.27 95,500 3,380 5 4,000 2722 05-22-92 109,000 3,860 7 2723 05-29-92 127,500 4,510 14 ~- 2724 06-12-92 147,750 5,230 28 2725 Discarded DISTRIBUTION city of Carlsbad (1) SCS&T, Escondido SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. REVIEWED BY: Michael B. Wheeler, R.C.E. #45358 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC 6280 RTVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92160 (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO, CA. 92025, (619) 746-4544 DATE: flay 6, 1992 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT FILE NUMBER 9121088 PROJECT-TITLE Home Plant Pump Station PROJECT LOCATION Carlsbad Boulevard (Highway 101), Carlsbad ARCHITECT ENGINEER PERM'T N°' CONTRACTOR PMC Mechanical Corp. PLAN FILE NO. LH CONCRETE (ASTM C39) O MORTAR (UBC 24-221 Q GROUT (ASTM Cl 019) D PRISMS {ASTM E447) n LOCATION IN STRUCTURE MATERIAL SUPPLIER ADMIXTURE(S) MIX DESIGNATION TIME IN MIXER, MINUTES SLUMP, INCHES SAMPLES FABRICATED BY SAMPLES TESTED BY Generator enclosure, 1st lift Pre-Mixed Mortar Lime Field Mixed D. Hicks DRB TRUCK No.TICKET No. LABORATORY No. MARK 2022 1023 2024 DATE MADE DATE RECEIVED DATE TESTED DIAMETER, INCHES AREA, SQUARE INCHES MAXIMUM LOAD, LBS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PSI AGE TESTED, DAYS REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, PSI UNIT WT./CU. FT. (PLASTIC) 04-29-92 04-30-92 05-OG-92 2.00 3.14 7,250 2,310 7 1,800 05-27-92 10,700 3,410 28 05-27-92 12,500 3,980 28 DISTRIBUTION (i) city of Carlsbad (1) SCS&T, Escondido SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. REVIEWED BY: Michael B. Wheeler, R.C.E. #45358 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC 6280 RTVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92160 (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO, CA. 92025, (619) 746-4544 DATE: Hay 6, 1992 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT FILE NUMBER 9121088 PROJECT TITLE Home Plant Pump Station PROJECT LOCATION Carlsbad Boulevard (Highway 101), Carlsbad ARCHITECT ENGtNEER PERM1T N°' CONTRACTOR PMC Mechanical Corp. PLAN FILE NO. C3 CONCRETE (ASTM C39) 03 MORTAR {U8C 24-22) Q GROUT (ASTM C1019) Q PRISMS (ASTM E447) D LOCATION IN STRUCTURE MATERIAL SUPPLIER ADMIXTURE(S) MIX DESIGNATION TIME IN MIXER, MINUTES SLUMP, INCHES SAMPLES FABRICATED BY SAMPLES TESTED BY Generator enclosure, 1st lift Pre-Mixed Mortar Lime Field Mixed D. Hicks DRB TRUCK No.TICKET No. LABORATORY No. MARK 2022 2024 DATE MADE DATE RECEIVED DATE TESTED DIAMETER, INCHES AREA, SQUARE INCHES MAXIMUM LOAD, LBS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PSI AGE TESTED, DAYS REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, PSI UNIT WT./CU. FT. (PLASTIC) 04-29-92 04-30-92 05-OG-92 2.00 3.14 7,250 2,310 7 1,800 05-27-92 10,700 3,410 28 05-27-92 12,500 3,980 28 DISTRIBUTION (i) City of Carlsbad (1) SCS&T, Escondido SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. REVIEWED BY: Michael B. Wheeler, R.C.E. #45358 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC 6280 RIVERDALE STREET, P.O. BOX 600627, SAN DIEGO, CA. 92160 (619) 280-4321 747 ENTERPRISE STREET, ESCONDIDO, CA. 92025, (619) 746-4544 DATE: May 6, 1992 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT FILE NUMBER 9121088 PROJECT TITLE Home Plant Pump Station PROJECT LOCATION Carlsbad Boulevard (Highway 101), Carlsbad ARCHITECT PERMIT No.ENGINEER CONTRACTOR PMC Mechani cal Corp. PLAN FILE NO. [Tl CONCRETE (ASTM C39) C8 MORTAR (UBC 24-22) D GROUT (ASTM C101 9) CI PRISMS (ASTM E447) a LOCATION IN STRUCTURE MATERIAL SUPPLIER ADMIXTURE(S) MIX DESIGNATION TIME IN MIXER, MINUTES SLUMP, INCHES SAMPLES FABRICATED BY SAMPLES TESTED BY Generator enclosure, 1st lift Pre-Mixed Mortar Lime Field Mixed D. Hicks DRB TRUCK No.TICKET No.. LABORATORY No. MARK 2022 2023 2024 DATE MADE DATE RECEIVED DATE TESTED DIAMETER, INCHES AREA, SQUARE INCHES MAXIMUM LOAD, LBS COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH, PSI AGE TESTED, DAYS REQUIRED 28 DAY STRENGTH, PSI UNIT WT./CU. FT. (PLASTIC) 04-29-92 04-30-92 05-OG-92 2.00 3.14 7,250 2,310 7 1,800 05-27-92 10,700 3,410 28 05-27-92 12,500 3,980 28 DISTRIBUTION (l) City of Carlsbad (1) SCS&T, Escondido SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. REVIEWED BY: Michael B. Wheeler, R.C.E. #45358 July 31, 1991 PLANCHECK 90-464 HOME PLANT SEWAGE PUMP STA KEN QUON: Confirming our conversation today, the following is required before the subject building permit can be issued: (accept 82 Code, etc) Building Department iorrections 1 thru 4 dated May 24, 1991. Plumbing & Elec correctioi Planning Department Coastal Permit Engineering Department Plans to be signed The project has been in plancheck since March 21, 1990. Technically the plancheck expired March 21, 1991- The City can extend its own plancheck and hjis done so informally. CARTER^ARNELL (-^ When the above corrections the appropriate slip , two corrected sets of plans or be submitted for final approval. -. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 DATE APPLICANT JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: Corkbcxrl PROJECT ADDRESS: <2j2>5>9 PROJECT NAME: W\dL QPLAN CHECKER QFILE COPY QUPS Pim p The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified iV\ "HAg r£fn&V"l<S b<f.\QU) are resolved and D checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. 1 Esgil staff been co 'ise applicant that the plan check has 'Person contacted: Date cont REMARKS ESGIL CORPORATION v DGA DAA DRN QDM ICO ESGIL CORPORATION 932O CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-1468 DATE: JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: PROJECT ADDRESS:_ PROJECT NAME: fj&tfg fiA SET: 21 LfifJT ftsrtsrf ~n* APPLICANT jPLAN CHECKE QFILE COPY QUPS PjDESIGNER The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified . are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ; The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. j The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. D The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: JUi Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that ^ plan check has been completed. I1 Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone I By:EnclosuresESGIL CORPORATION! GA DAA DRN @ JURISDICTION: /PffL $%&£> Date plans received by plan checker: PLAN CHECK NO.: Qfi- 4fr4 H Date plan check completed: 7-30 -*?/ By; CT> il fl * C O » C-PROJECT ADDRESS: fttHfe lUlkH'je\iJ/l&&' rQf$r ±>fr97fcW TO: ^p'P f'^^-^- PLAN CORRECTION SHEET FOREWORD: PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items shown below need clarification, modification or change. All items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303(c), of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original 3. Please indicate here if any changes have tracings and submit two new sets of prints, been made to the plans that are not a result and any original plan sets that may have been of corrections from this list. If there are returned to you by the jurisdiction, to: other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. /"i • iL irv Have changes been made to the p lans not I resulting from this correction list? Please check. . To facilitate checking, please identify, next _ Yes _ No to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this check sheet with the revised plans. 4-. loetofift ffa,P fat Wrn^e fttjp SKWM& ItJ UPC. 4bi TA) 2, A- ft*(//5f* -ffl S/£>t<y Coffefc t,. n All, tfVTC£&*> , fi#tJ5 Vo MAT <£ Stt&r // Form No.. PCS.A1390 ELECTRICALPLAN CORRECT IQNSHEET JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER : __ PLAN CHECKER: DARRELL MORRISON / . Submit complete electrical plans reflecting the full extent of work to be performed, including but not limited to the following as applicable. *C Submit complete service and feeder one- ' line diagram. KEC 215-5. Show the Available Fault Current (Isc) from the Utility Co. and at equipment where the Isc exceeds 10,000 amps. Show the ampere interrupting capacity (AIC) ratings of service and subservice equipment. KEC 110-9, 230-65. Show the method used to limit fault currents to 10,000 amps on branch circuits. Show fuse letters if used (i.e., JJN, A3T, LPN). fi". Show fuse/breaker size(s). KEC 240-6. Show each building disconnecting means. KEC 230-84. 8. } Show conduit and wire sizes. PWL.'S'A* f' " £F " Specify wire type (AL or CU) and insulation (i.e. THWN). KEC ART 310. '. Show the approximate length of feeders. 11. IShow the grounding system required for V_Xeach building, structure, or service. KEC 250-24, 80(a), 81(c). x~N^ PML- " Pep" ( LZ.jShow the "nearest electrode" used for each \—/ transformer secondary ground system(i.e., bldg. steel, cold water pipe). KEC 250- 13.1 Show the grounding electrode conductor V Xsize and wire type (AL/CU). KEC 250-94. PML^'BCP" r*i/»J 4tS^^ &G- Xr TM. Submit load calculations. Include long ' continuous loads (LCL) and largest motor loads. KEC ART 220. IS. Show/Identify new loads proposed for the existing equipment. lo. Indicate cain service size and total load. 17. Specify wiring methods (i.e., EKT, Metal ^ Conduit). PAGE: SET: DATE:~7 I 30 /<?/ / /• . Show location of Service(s). KEC 110-16, 23O-2. Specify dimensions of equipment rated 1200 amps or more. KEC 110-16(c). Provide the required access and entrance to working space for equipment rated 1200 amps or more and over 6 feet wide. KEC Show location of all panels, load centers, switchboards, and transformers. KEC 110-16, 240-24, 300-21. 22.)Provide the required working space about electrical equipment. KEC 110-16. HI^J id_2." it*-t /-£&*-!< c'& ''P'C.p "L2f. Submit complete panel schedule(s). 2^. Provide overcurrent protection on the secondary side of transformers. KEC 240- 21 Er., 384-16(d). . Provide required transformer ventilation. KEC 450-9. Provide receptacle(s) within 25 feet of HVAC equipment. tMC 509. zJ. Provide the required 20 anp 1200 VA sign circuit(s) and receptacle(s). KEC 600- 6(b)(c). Provide "uniform" pattern lighting within sight of multiple switch lighting controls. CAC Title 24, 5319. Where the exit system serves a total occupant load of: a) 50 or more. Show exit s igns on lighting plan(s) at all required exits and specify either self luminous or second power source (battery or generator). KEC 700-16/DBC 3314. b)100 or more. Provide min. 1 ft. candle at floor level of emergency (exit) illumination and specify second power source (battery or generator). KEC 700- 16/DBC 3313. 30. )To speed up the recheckjp.ro.cess, note on this list for a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.^ plan sheet,, specification, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked^ up list when you submit the revised plans. -°" -==-'= Any questions on electrical corrections please contact the plan checker shown above at Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468, Thank you. 07/13/91 ELECTRICAL PLAN CORRECTION SHEET JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NUMBER : PAGE: SET: I 2^ PLAN CHECKER : DARRELL MORRISON DATE: 7 A-U- ->LjRP^r*»AJG-MU<7~JAJ T7V/JS AF 32. A ESGIL CORPORATION 932O CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 2O8 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-I468 DATE: £ JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NAME: \± C%- Cto SET: Tf g=> APPLICANT [jPLAN CHECKERQFILE COPY QUPS r~ DESIGNER The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified fcxAa»O ' are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Ij Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has —' been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone # <Uwv<~T5 reBy: m\ _ _ ESGIL CORPORATION DGA DAA DRN H Enclosures m m £H- ^ -> c.~t TTxA-r. V\~"nr,,~c -nr.^ /Vo^tr^^ £.^P\~ to/ ^-s^u^., UTC,UMC-<v_ J <<O -* ^j *^J / = • 1 1^*1 kiec^ . MX -bo ?V*i^ ^^T, O^?\AV,S , 0.<.*Ut(^^ - Qpf ti ^Ji^"Cl^ P*. v^Ax_^ A \r\T7K ^^-a^rnTL <^,i\<» £*\ - ~r^/rC U^ UAi r^v'i^Oi 'TWf ^ou-.A. -^Vn^'S i TkeM. Co>v.PU ,^/ U it, r^Ca»^*w j-vs dA^c*^^ I f« f'.fJ' B\\wL v( ^'Ppit^^TTT^JCr OA^^^^ ^ t)KTT(5) "\-TC Co^ Pr-^s^< ^T7in-CTC*XCs«cr. 0^,,x ^!A\O o^^r^A^ . r/UlC* 4 r^sw-A-'^AVai. C?^v 7, e«o^^*Jlc'5 >> - ( i.e , m,n, 3.Sfes/ ^"- v}aJL>> % t^<*A M&^<,^ * _ * Appl*^K^T7 "To KiJIir^^ /'Uwi TCAir T/^ns . ^4/^//"77T*i ^ 5^P<c is . a« **&?>» Ji)/^(j7o7 tsn r4fi«.J AUors tOflibe ^£j bwiTfTLi T7TJ^- Ri^U - tw^TT , A*^. — , _ v — -— • — • ^^ « •> ,^?^prov*J2 7>r^ov~To '*STAU«.U £s^ . 5/31/91 Marty: This is a recent correction sheet for the "Home Plant Sewage Pump Station". See Item 1 above. Ken Quon tells me that you approve the 1982 UBC & 1981 NEC for design. At present we are 1988 and 1987 respectively. Carter TTKK 1 In approuf-H- DATE CORRECT PLANS TO EXISTING CODES DATE 6/13 Marty says 82 and 81 codes never mentioned. Ken says structure designed in 1987. He will confer with architect. CD ColL Q\\ tM^r-d 'Xtjv ^6>C£>T^«> (*} {jVi t^CeO - 14-fcff - i. «TV IT r«T1 1 "~ # -4 * .pV**n/ l<Hg^.\J LT-^^o_ ^ A. TT /'.6 , rxi.n. 3-5 fc*/ Jurisdiction Prepared 31dg. Dept. VALUATTON AND PLAN CHECK rZS NO. ^U TIDING ADDRESS «i 55^. £fc>, r^l/d • AP-LICANT/COKTACT Tb,J/ K. PHONE NO. 5^,S*r^ •=\JTLDING OCCUPANCY ^~*f Tt?3 0? CONSTRUCTION BUILDING PORTION : ^w^cCC cvJU DESICKiR PHONE — 3T-AJ CONTRACTOR PHONE — •• ' . / . "JILDING ARH:^ ~ ( ?V^P ^KVN^^^i 1 1 • /AQUATION 1 I ' Air Condition's: Commercial . . Residential Res. or Corrcn. Fire S-orinXlers VALUE g£o to&& ^~ I 1 ' • , • ! I'e 1 9 @ • •i • i Total Value ®-o]*^ Building Permit Fee. J, Plan Check Fee $ SHEET CH OF C 12/87 - 7 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR.. SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 56O-14SS DATE:-30 - >Q CHECK WO:SET: CH PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NAMS: \A lOURISDlCTJj CHECKER ,FIL3 COPY•nupsHDESIGK-ER The plans transmitted herewith have been, corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The pl'ans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified ^ . are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The'plans are being held at Ssgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person; The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: - IT" mm~ =- - .._••_- L J" • J. .._—.-- -=- -. -—• J_- -—--.. - _ .. ' - _ ,'_ TfcB CI ' AA 15 i • _ Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. Ssgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: REMARKS: Telephone ESGIL CORPORATIONC3-A^ DGA DAA Dvw D Enclosures PBOJCCT TO: TSi PiAN CORRECTION SHEET Planf Check FOREWORD; PLEASE READ Plan check is limited-to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items circled below need clarification, modification or change. All circled items have to be satisfied before the plans will be in csnfcrmance with-the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), of the Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A, PLANS ^Ni.J Please flake all corrections on the original -~^ tracings and submit two new sets of prints, and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by" the jurisdiction, to: «• •*-- v ' " To facilitate rcchccking, ple83c identify, next to eoch circled Item, the aheet of the pUna upon vhich each correction on this sheet has been made and return this - check sheet »Uh Iho revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. Please contact »e if you have any questions regarding these items. " Date plaiwjeeeived by plan checked Cate .' ^ . plan check 5/_ -k Li •+?f<MgTL on .0 \eA.\\a\- c*[,'<,. Jurisdiction Prepared byt Bldg. Dept. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE PLAN CHECK NO. fj±~ Cin^Lt^ CTJ> ADDHESS PHONSKO. BUILDING OCCUPANCY __ TYPE 0? CONSTRUCTION DESIGNER PHONE CONTHACT03 PHONE BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AHS'VALUATION 1-';ULTI?LIEH VALUE Air Conditioning Commercial Residential Res. or Coirjii. Fire 5-DrinXlers Total Value Building Permit fte. $. Plan Check Fee S C D H ME N TSj SHEET (T) OF (1 12/87 BUILDING PLANCHECK ENGINEERING CHECKLIST .-, X - ' xlUi DATE: 2°) MflR °)i n n n n n n n 1s T C H E K h\n IX 2 N D C H E K :—ft. < 3 R D C H E K 2-!5 !~j.C~j( •-..- "'. -f'lj tr ./i. PROJECT ID: s^ij'^1! r::P^T%.T- t-- .-.*':• .-'^"V LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan ITEM COMPLETE ITEM INCOMPLETE NEEDS YOUR ACTION ITEM SELECTED D 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimension setbacks. 2. Show on site plan: Finish floor elevations, pad elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway with percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. 3. Provide legal description and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionary Approval Compliance 4. No Discretionary approvals were required. 5. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. . 6. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No. PCf\ ^•"/ - 2 **• / N/W Conditions complied with by:. Field Review Date: 1—[ |—| |—| 7> Field review completed. No issues raised. nnn 8. nnn nnn Field review completed. The following issues or discrepancies with the site plan were found: A. Site lacks adequate public improvements B. Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. C. Site is served by overhead power lines. P:\DOCS\HISFORMS\FRM0010.0H REV. 02/27/91 I—I I—I I—I D< Grading is required to access site, create pad or provide for ultimate street improvement. I—I I—I I—I E. site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsite turnaround or engineered solution to problem. nan F. Other: Dedication Requirements n 9. No dedication required. '—' '—' '—' 10. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8V1 x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. The description of the dedication is as follows: Dedication completed, Date By: Improvement Requirements I—I I—I lla No public improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City inspector prior to occupancy. '—' '—' '—'l2. Public improvements required. This project requires construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please have a registered civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit for separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are: Improvement plans signed, Date: by: P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FRM0010.DH REV, 02/27/91 I—'" I—1 I—I*'—','—''—' 13. Improvements are required. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please submit a letter requesting deferral of the required improvements together with a recent title report on the property and the appropriate processing fee so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date: By:nnc 13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). I I . .i—i i—i 14 B No grading, required as determined by the information provided ori1 the site plan. 15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and grading substantially complete and found acceptable to the City Inspector prior to issuance of Building Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date: by: Miscellaneous Permits szfnn 16. Right-of-Way Permit not required. 17. Right-of-Way Permit required. A separate Right-of-Way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: L—' '—' '—' 18. Sewer Permit is not required. '—' '—' '—' 19. Sewer Permit is required. A sewer Permit is required concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. 20. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FRM0010.0H REV. 02/27/91 l_4 ' — I I — I 21. Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Industrial Waster Permit accepted - Date : _ By : _ Fees Required D tyf) 27. Park-in-Lieu Fee Quadrant: _ Fee per Unit: _ Total Fees: _ ._ D M/A 23. Traffic Impact Fee Fee Per Unit: _ Total Fee: _ D Mft 24. Bridge and Thorough fare Fee Fee Per Unit: _ Total Fee: D *A 25. Public Facilities Fee required. D lJ/fl 26. Facilities Management Fee Zone: _ Fee: D M/tf 27. Sewer Fees Permit No. _ EDU's Benefit Area: _ Fee: D f^jft 28. Sewer Lateral Required: Fee: _ 0 29. REMARKS: CflfiSTfiL EEiJElDP. PERMIT MOST SE .^AKJD PLflMS aigjOgQ feV QTV •2s/ " ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PERMIT BY : ^gggaMJg xi xpyar^ig^; DATE : —7 -7-?/ P:\DOCS\MISFORHS\FRH0010.DH REV. 02/27/91 * 'iA Af (N ,- .- _ *Q fQ O J o o o11 V V•e -e J=u u t-> a. a. a. Plan Check No. Planner. PLANNING CHECKLIST Address Phone 438-1161 ext. (Name) 2oo-APN: Type of Project and Use _ Zone Ds Facilities Management Zone IlS-L^ — j * r* O-NV-^TI 7 Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action 1,2,3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified D D Environmental Review Required: YES )( NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: * Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval D D Discretionary Action Required: YES JC NO _ TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. - DATE: PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval ia Coastal Commission Permit Required: YES X NO DATE OF APPROVAL:-^) < i San Diego Coast District, 1333 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 125, San Diego, CA. 92108-3520 (619) 297-9740 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval ._ STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE tESOURCES AGENCY PETE WILSON. Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SAN D.EGO COAST AREA 3111 CAMINO DEL RIO NORTH, SUITE 200 SAN DIEGO, CA 92)08-!72S (619) 521-8036 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6-91-34 Page 1 Of 4 On May 7. 199]the California Coastal Commission granted to City of Carlsbad this permit for the development described below, subject to the attached Standard and Special Conditions. Description:Demolition of a pump station and trickle filter and construction of a sewage pump station and sewer force main. The 1,900 lineal foot force main will begin at the new pump station and travel under Carlsbad Boulevard, State Street, and Laguna Drive to the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Laguna Drive. Site: Lot Area Building Coverage Pavement Coverage Landscape Coverage Unimproved area Zoning Plan Designation Ht abv fin grade 1 .21 acres 850 sq. ft 2,600 sq. ft 2,100 sq. ft 47,150 sq.ft. Open Space Open Space 29 feet (5%) (90%) West side of Carlsbad Boulevard, south of State Street, Carlsbad, San Diego County. APN 155-200-01,02,03, Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commission by PETER DOUGLAS Executive Director and IMPORTANT: THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNLESS AND UNTIL A COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGEMENT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION OFFICE. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide by all terms and conditions thereof. Date Signature of Permittee COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6 -91 34 Page 2 of 4 STANDARD CONDITIONS: 1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgement. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging.receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Compliance. All development must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval. 4. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. 5- Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and the development during construction, subject to 24-hour advance notice 6. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 7. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: The permit is subject to the following conditions: 1. Offer to Dedicate Open Space Easement. Prior to the issuance of a coastal development permit, the applicant shall record an irrevocable offer to dedicate to a public agency, or to a private association acceptable to the Executive Director, an open space easement over the area shown on the attached Exhibit "#3" and generally described as the portion of a 100 foot wetland buffer zone located on the applicant's property extending from and parallel to the water's edge of Buena Vista Lagoon located immediately off site and found at elevation 5.5 as shown on a survey done by the City of Carlsbad dated April 24, 1991. The easement shall allow for limited access, e.g. a five foot wide pedestrian trail, along the entire width of the property within the upper buffer area. The upper buffer area is defined as the upland 50 feet (farthest away from the lagoon) of the required 100 foot buffer. The document shall include legal descriptions of both the applicant's entire pare and COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 6 91-34 Page 3 of 4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS, continued: easement area. Said open space easement shall prohibit any alteration of landforms, placement or removal of vegetation, or erection of structures of any type, unless approved by the California Coastal Commission or its successor in interest. The offer shall be irrevocable for a period of 21 years, shall run in favor of the People of the State of California, binding successors and assigns of the applicant and/or landowners, and shall be recorded prior to all other liens and encumbrances, except tax liens. The offer to dedicate shall be in a form and content acceptable to the Executive Director. 2. Revegetation/Restoration Plan. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit a detailed revegetation plan indicating the type, size, extent and location of all plant materials, any proposed irrigation system and other landscape features to revegetate the required buffer. Native plants similar to those existing in the upland area surrounding Buena Vista Lagoon and compatible with the freshwater marsh areas of the lagoon shall be utilized to the maximum extent feasible to re-establish the area consistent with its previous character. The plan shall also provide for the removal of the existing non-native and invasive vegetation within the buffer (iceplant and palm trees) and the replanting of this area with native upland plantings. The plan shall also indicate that the portion of the access drive within the buffer must also be removed and revegetated with native plant materials. Said plan shall be reviewed and approved in writing by the Executive Director. 3. Erosion Control. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit final grading and erosion control plans which shall incorporate the following: a. Grading shall be prohibited in the period between October 1 and April 1 of any year. b. All permanent runoff and erosion control devices shall be developed and installed prior to or concurrent with any on-site grading activities. c. All areas disturbed shall be stabilized in advance of the rainy season (October 1 to March 31 of each year). The use of temporary erosion control measures, such as berms, interceptor ditches, sandbagging, filtered inlets, debris basins, and silt traps shall be utilized in conjunction with plantings to minimize soil loss from the hillsides or restoration area. COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. b 91-34 Page 4 of 4 SPECIAL CONDITIONS, continued: 4. Drainage Plan. Prior to the issuance of the coastal development permit, the applicant shall submit for the review and written approval of the Executive Director, a drainage and runoff control plan. This plan shall document that runoff from impervious surfaces will be collected and discharged to the street where feasible. Runoff shall be directed away from sloping areas where possible, and any runoff directed over these areas shall be retained and discharged at a non-erosive velocity and elevation (below the 5.5 contour) to protect the habitat values of the lagoon from degradation by scouring or concentrated runoff. (1034P) ODD Landscape Plan Required: YES X NO See attached submittai requirements for landscape, plans Site Plan: DD Zoning: 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawivto scale. Show; North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. 2. Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes and driveway. 3. Provide legal description of property. 4. Provide assessor's parcel number. i. Setbacks: ana Front: Int. ^ide: (VfA Street Side: /st Rear: 2. Lot coverage: . 3. Height: 4. Parking: Additional Comments V Required Required Required Required Required Required Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO DATE . 5" PLNCK.FRM -IT 2560 ORION WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92008 TELEPHONE (619)931-2121 ARCHITECT OCCUPANCY Citp of Caristoab FIRE DEPARTMENT PLAN CHJ=pK REPORT DDRESS PAGE 1 OF APPROVED DISAPPROVED PLAN CHECK# ) * f^Q PT7 n<J/3 **< ADDRESS _ ADDRESS CONST.TOTAL SQ.FT. &/g£»O PHONE ./ PHONE STORIES DSPRINKLERED DTENANTIMP. APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS Provide one copy of: floor plan(s); site plan; sheets Provide two site plans showing the location of alt existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. Provide specifications for the following: , , Permits are required for the installation of all fire protection systems (sprinklers, stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, CO2, alarms, hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire department prior to installation. The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return It to the fire department. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT The following fire protection systems are required: D Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria: ; __) D Dry Chemical, Halon, COa (Location: .• ) D Stand Pipes (Type: •, . , : ) D Fire Alarm (Type/Location: , > , •• .' ) 7. Fire Extinguisher Requirements: Sft One 2A rated ABC extinguisher for each ' extinguisher not to excied^iwt erf tn mextlngulsher With a minimum rating ol sq. ft. or portion to be locate* trtbr: 6. Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided EXITS 9. Exit doors shall be openable from the Inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. 10. A sign stating, " This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be placed above the main exit and doors 11. EXIT signs (6" x 3V letters) shall be placed over all required ex lit s and directional signs located as necessary to clearly indicate the location of exit doors. GENERAL Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code. 13. Buildlng(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage In closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet in height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids. If high stock pil- ing Is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. 14. -Additional Requirements. : : f&PT. -fb/L /ft .15. Comply with regulations on attached sheet(s). Plan c.ami»l_/f Report mailed to architect Met with Attach to Plans CITY OF CARLSBAD STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE HOME PLANT SEWAGE PUMP STATION PROJECT NO. 3299 ALMGREN & KOPTIONAK, INC, CONSULTING ENGINEERS DATE JOB SHEET SUBJECT C4 -1C ALMGREN & KOPTIONAK. INC, CONSULTING ENGINEERS DATE JOB , SHEET SUBJECT — S < ~-n *n C- Tr i Wv» q^/'^nr X uj"1 &wr ( C=> /. 0 /" 7 /2 - f /#7i/d7 »A'^>7 h JS . , ' k; Jy* ' c- s z-r L •*.1 ' - / -\ U. W-/ / -7 Xf'f* v X - > N: •^ " * ^ -77 ACT y-r-* //r //->-£-$./ f '^i//>. 1-} i ' '/ p *-£ .' ^ P. A-'5)- • ^ "'7; > c- > Z-•'•?.* / f // . / f/ 2-) / ~ 7/f9-n f 7 (r- CO'" / -/ ^A^ty c^-vT' ^ ,- M s> ft .1 > *_J • • * ^£» J , t *r J &{./;.&? s Y * " ' 'if*,* - -i X , (.'-a -/7 T V^A^?•& -i£ r~ + * 'Z £yLy~* :^Jf-tctJA. £yfr*7* r ^^f— NLi u_ J; 1! i * ^X. ^K. i /? J st* I ( :9JSroot.AND v*"£S' COITION Jf '-; .1, .-,-. -*.~~:, ••;. = !<-«• ii- D\. is: is;:-.:- .' :"<. . '.tt'.i :•-•--'S: '.ns • -f. -. =j,i-r- "•-..i. j«- :-i-.:i^: -iic- •-: - -.s ;•-.<•".•; •••::•",•<*. '-KJCT^SES :*c:-i:ij. .i-Li' '; *i;0 9*C«MLL SMALL CONFO«« TO . l'BJCl>J«t M*!tti ^Su-'ti TH»T »S 3£**lLED 0*< T«E -'SE~ II »LL JOINTS JOINTS HOTvtO BT rnt TM£ LOCtT :C SC(C:'!C*ll. i.sc .; i'f IA. r -OK :-hr ic:. '.-' -i '•• - ":";'„•-»£ r TCC i-sF t: »;s: ;• -•"j-*» JE.'-JFOaC INC ST(£L S*1*(.L SE SUBJECT TO icjiscaIE; SHALL MOT BE •i£ 5-9UISED, Cl^OSED :-i • - ' St 5-9*V ON T -s -T -" Os * -*',^ Si.— _i:f* tt'-r1.1 ti-io• ;• 'ox', :;: JNS :0!. --••: ;ii^i *sE ' - f -7*— .-iKTt« ;... 6. -c:-i» C. ~f*Q\i: T.iT*uf 1'ON S-»LL vti.fQii LIMITS AST" C-90 STi c-:?o i*-£ MO* 5 ;C50 'SI "JM -AI.-S IIALL 3( .aouTfS SOLID. -on; ANC Mi icn of AL j-i^u" »o*« SMALL CON*O«M :r:;*-IONS «o» *LU"itj« 5T»uc'u«es" sr TH( is^o::-i:rov. "ML£5S ST-SSWISE INDICATED, ?3. -fcr;:s»oar:«s SIAL^ 3£ J.»»L.ED TO S>TE»IO« o^ »LL WALLS 3t,:n jLC-~Ti3'- -11.50 iNO •-••O(B JASC SLi» AS sn3«n. )! -f". '-liSLf '-: 'EE*. •*: • i.'..±~ ;c>i <-*L; s»-i-.v» »f, *t e •« v.-i-i'.i: r -. ?;:;. *f -".;s. •TSOSTITIC «fAD TO i"' ICT iccaio i* qv i-sr - ;'.-' r ..'- -i 2' -S"r.-trj •-;,.-*.' • ' - . '- ?•. -: T-:.-S. '.; £ 5 ." - -^ - :- :-!•-•. re ••>.: • ; -i-_ ;-.-, 1---=.: ! -;-;» ;i -;-•-':.• '-: ^ ... ; r; •-•-'.••On s-Z^ *' ,2>T = *J V :..£fLd7 __.± ^/ / ''1 ^V A i /A 2. ^ 5,7 «: ^7 _ jr^rf** i ,7 A? -/> A /6-y ft," &, / *- /^^ /s 7fi'^ /tx '— 7-0, • tt ^ . y/ //'/ *'"•_:i/-. _r. • -"' * *—ft-*, _ . . ../..*& /?iT /:./, "f "y 1~ ^ t/ ^, r* /i ^ "3 i \ #1- 7 *Ts X A? - = - 'et* -_ f 4. '/-& •/•a < - , GO 1 ff 2.-L, .4^ i,<Z !*L -7/-1 .49.3 '-7 r r r r r r r o,. r* r^ r r r ,t*\ -/r cl2£ r^ r r ./ r r r r r r r r :-o - n / \ •=- £»o r r r r r r r r ALJ /=.|*fc^JK"A*-»Pi^^a^^.^.^J^_^,^,^^tJM^ // £ ^V £>.SdK//V- ^7 7 [I r ,r 1 '" TiI / IM III I. I. r r r r r '"/• -T^ <i_^1'<?^r V? . •* ""/r «. «.S u (/ ± **,& (r.r'-At?) =• f-7* ^- /£,& ''it /, IS, X r 76 '« ,/*/^ / z, r r r r vW 7,* ^My', ,j-A X - r r r r r r r XT 7-0 i^,x y r r r r 'y !,A) s T • r r r r O, ^ / r^/% r r C ^ .'*./T(. ^ /. r .^ r r r ~ f&* o y r r r r r r r s^- <t» '' 4 I* r r r r r -7- /"Y r r r I 7 \ t r r .LI:: f r // 5* *t >4*b r > /,- • ^^ /v r r r r r r j i* <?. c 6-r </• r r r (<10 So,/ <f<3.0 £.1 r r r r r r r r r r r r . r r . L 7 - 7J7?•./ r r / I £2 -L c Z /r« /,*•£ ,3(10 r V-'V *?•? -i-3, r r =^V >/-?4/v >- . /. ^ — TO 0. f.S AJ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r fv n*irs1 VJs^1*/ $*r * 'Q \ s*1 ^> .,• -^ -r- 1-f* *J** f,S ^vrI Tri- ^A^T £>-O AA.O. r . T-. vint r r r r f.fr r Ix r r r — r r r r r U&C,C«FTR. MjAN r r r r r f-I—I V r r r r t r xX ® t i \i U i •I :! t ; »i it ; :,j r r r r r r r r A Ha «ft ; 2. / .r/*/ 'r. 7' ~.+ r r r rir *), . obf r -f = 2y. % / 7 ^ r r r r , ?£• ~ r r r r Sir. r r r r r r r **»*.%- r r r r r r r •SS" OO ('7'tfix't-'-t)'- r r r r r r r r r $V r r *~ /;/ *y e Af 79* ft-*-79 /. s v £**V^ A?,-/ An V/7' 2>'**V<r ta-f. ^L ^)y •2k^,»» r 92. r r r r r r r A r r r r r r I. i; r. r R r r r t r r r r r. VI VJm-\ ^. - -f oo. ±D.e.. _.;£>_ lEZ. 2"r r —L. r R I iZco Ab Come, bed TVA<M4.__l<(v 1 /i.v \ AT- .. I ^ooss (4o-r ~ • — (• r r_ r_" rir r. r r I\J-^*i^fc» h- r r r r io I loo lb^> , - - —"5 Z&~J -TrcoTfo «* fe>- -. C_s' ?o' • J (^J2--c-) fc..TiAdo*-fl -±j.oX t1 e6 Ji L. .Z&T) r - r r Jb Q. O 4-n-8 r •2.4 2-9 . yl iov'2tp r r; r r r r r r r r r r Atx..vjj .rru An,sb ..Mil ^fee. 'Be **<l 1' x £o/uiueCTK>Ut>Bt OF TD .•=> r L •JF = r r r ^ Vjd iLL, CDvlTti^BaTE- r r r r r - -t - OP Qbie.'Bou- OF..__LA r ""piipe. 17oo Ibs r V iu* t r .4-. r r •t r r r r r f ^5<V.. Mvwo^ — *..-2^ ^ U.'be 4?>.j2o r ; i r r r r ^ i_ LL U 3 10 Vw /" . 2. Ac pSc.)JOoad _______ . 3,600 r r r r r .a _.» __Z3• -•It-— -OV- i 4V\ i cjlk CO!bV -it-- I; !. r r -f K T'ii- r ;! c 3.5 (2") y A 2.25 .ft bpa >.l _ Dtea r -OCX?0 ^^•KCIHIV V DO 59 v- /*' 17* MAX (KACMAt.) SECTION 2*4 AOOfcOx 4S-Q* LA HAUNCH DETAIL VCHAMFCR ELECTRICAL APPLICATION 3 U !"! CUSTOMER NAME JOB NAME DEALER/CONSULTAWT JOB NUMBER CITY GF CARLSBAD HOME PLANT RJM ASSOCIATES INC S3-2422 ANALVST DATE - GAS GR DIESEL ENGINE 3PEED-RPM APPLICATION ENGINE FAN SYSTEM VOLTAGE FREQUENCY LIGHTING LOAD OTHER NON-MOTOR LOAD MOTOR RUNNING LOAD M 0 1. HP KW EFF. KW 1 20 14 .372 17 2 2O 14 .372 17 35 3 -333 4 IRVING GOLDS 01-13-33 DIESEL 1300 STANDBY YES 430 60 HZ 1 KW 12 KW 33 KW TOR C A L (MfcrlM ^LJl_>K.czlJ CODE ROTOR AMPS B 151 B 151 F 33 TE ENGINE MODEL GENERATOR FRAME GENERATOR aRNG. NO "( 3TD SIZE ) TOTAL RUNNING LOAD ENGINE RATING MAX ALLOWABLE VOLT - ACTUAL VOLTAGE DIP CULATIQMS ^if^TI I&l tt-'lil C?lf-'tJ£.HL. I UHL. tvW pPsVH SKVA STARTED MULT. 67 0 ,1 . OO 67 14 1.03 27 23 1 . 1O 320SNA 363 7W7S20 51 KW 53 KW DIP 20.0 "/. 9.4 % „____ pf-KITrlU 1 LJr£ . U»M 1 STARTER TAP- TYPE 2 25 2 25 1 1 00 S. £ certrcr1^* * I-^LP' SKVA 17 17 29 STARTER TYPES: l«None; 2*Resistor, Reactor, Impedance 3=Auto Trans-former , 4=» ' Y 'Start, Delta Run ASSOCIATES, I IMC 9845 ERMA RO, SAN DEIGO, CA 92131 (629) 586-6272 JOB NAME: HOME PLANT SEWAGE PUMP STATION DESIGNER: STAN CONNER DATE: 18-Jan-S8 O7:58 AM JOB * 2422 HOME2422.WK1 I OtMS 1 PUMPS at 20hp - 480 volts, 3 phase at 1257. 2 PUMPS at 20hp - 48O volts, 3 phase at 1OO7. HYDRAULIC UNIT at 5hp - 48O volt, 3 phasa at 10O7. PANEL A PANEL G TOTAL VOLT AMPSs 926O8 VOLT AMPS at 48OY/277 VOLTS - 3 PHASES - 4 WIRESs TOTAL AMPSs 2OO AMP SERVICE 28,046 44,874 6,316 8,991 4,381 92,6O8 111.4 MOMP PI ANT 5PWARF PUMP STAT ADDENDUM TO PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION PUMP STATION, CITY OF CARLSBAD NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF STATE STREET AND CARLSBAD BOULEVARD CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: MR. BILL KOPTIONAK ALMGREN & KOPTIONAK 9968 HIBERT STREET, SUITE 102 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92131 OCTOBER 26,1987 PROJECT NO. 100239-02 Almgren & Koptionak October 26,1987 Project No. 100259-02 Table of Contents Page Site Description 1 Proposed Site Development 2 Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing 2 Subsurface Conditions 2 Conclusions and Recommendations 3 Illustrations Figure 1A - Site Location Map Figure 2A - Site Plan Figure 3A - Lateral and Uplift Pressure Diagrams Appendices Appendix A - References Appendix B - Boring Log Geotechnical Consultants October 26,1987 Project No. 100239-02 Almgren & Koptionak 9968 Hibert Street, Suite 102 San Diego, California 92131 Attention: Mr. Bill Koptionak Subject: Addendum to "Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Pump Station, City of Carlsbad, North of the Intersection of State Street and Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad, California." Gentlemen: This addendum to our previously submitted report (Appendix A, Reference 1), presents the results of additional subsurface investigation performed at the revised location of the facility. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the site materials relative to the results, conclusions and recommendations presented in the referenced report, and to modify these, or present new recommendations for the design and construction of the planned facility. Site Description The subject property consists of a roughly triangular shaped lot just north of the inter- section of Carlsbad Boulevard and State Street in Carlsbad, California (Figure 1A). The site is relatively level at an approximate elevation of 31 feet (MSL) and has no significant vegetation. A 100 foot diameter trickling filter tank structure exists approximately 12 feet north of the northern boundary of the site, at approximately the same elevation. To the south, the site descends at a slope ratio of approximately 5:1 (horizontal to vertical) to a railroad right-of-way at approximate elevation 22 feet (MSL). To the east, a slope as- cends toward Carlsbad Boulevard at a slope ratio of approximately 5:1 (horizontal to verti- cal), to approximate elevation 37 feet (MSL). Soil Engineering • Geology • Groundwater 10225 Barnes Canyon Road • Suite A-II2 • San Diego, CA 9212! • (619)457-0400 1.1,1. Almgren & Koptionak October 26,1987 Project No. 100239-02 Proposed Site Development The proposed site development will include construction of a partially underground sewage pump station. Based on preliminary plans and sections (Appendix A, Reference 2 and 3), the dry and wet well will be approximately 28 feet deep. A diesel generator room will be located southeast of the wells founded at, or close to, the existing ground surface. We un- derstand that only minor grading will be required, thus the site will remain at approxi- mately the existing grade. Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing Subsurface conditions at this new location were evaluated by drilling one test boring (B- 1A) to a depth of approximately 35.5 feet below existing grade. A geologist was present during the drilling operation to log materials encountered and to obtain representative soil samples. A boring log is presented in Appendix B, and the boring location is shown in Fig- ure 2A. Sampling in the boring consisted of relatively undisturbed ring samples obtained using a sampler driven into the soil with a 140 pound hammer, dropping 30 inches. The number of blows required for 12 inches of penetration is shown on the boring log. Laboratory tests were performed on representative soil samples obtained from the ex- ploratory boring to evaluate in-place moisture and density characteristics, and all samples were visually classified. The test results are presented on the boring log (Appendix B). Subsurface Conditions Based on our subsurface investigation and review of the map by -Weber, 1982, the geologic formation present at the site is the Eocene Santiago Formation. About 11 feet of beach deposits, followed by approximately 5 feet of man-made fill overlie the Santiago Forma- tion. Groundwater was encountered at a depth of about 30 feet in the boring. Detail descriptions of the materials encountered are presented on the boring log (Appendix B). Generalized descriptions of the materials encountered are as follows: ,u Almgren & Koptionak October 26.1987 Project No, 100239-02 o The fill material generally consisted of brown firm silty sandy clay, and clayey silt, with some gravel. / o Beach Deposits These deposits consisted of generally gray-green, dense, silty fine sand with zones of brown-orange oxide stains, and occasional coarse sand pockets. o Santiago Formation The Santiago Formation as observed, consisted of weakly cemented in- terbedded very dense sandy siltstone and silty sandstone, with minor amounts of clay and occasional coarse sand or fine gravel. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions The results of this additional investigation indicate that the subsurface conditions are sim- ilar to those reported in our earlier report (Appendix A, Reference 1). Considering the geotechnical aspects of design and construction, the conditions at this proposed location appear generally more favorable, than those of the prior site. Because the revised location is at a higher elevation than the previous site, the depth to groundwater is greater. After evaluating the soil moisture data from this subsurface investigation in relation to the data from the original site, and the general topography, adaptation of a design groundwater level of 20 feet (MSL) is, in our opinion, appropriate. The depth of undocumented man- made fill appears less than 5 feet, and the fill is underlain by the beach deposits, which are competent bearing materials. The formational material is very dense, with varying degrees of cementation, and is predominantly granular. Almgren & Koptionak October 26,1987 Project No. 100239-02 Excavation can, in our opinion, be accomplished with normal mechanical excavating equipment. However, depending on the size and power of the equipment, loosening of the formaticnal material may occasionally be required, and can, in our opinion, be accom- plished by utilizing a mechanical "bull point" or rock breaker. In general, we conclude that the recommendations presented in our earlier report for this project (Appendix A, Reference 1) are valid, other than as modified below: Recommendations These recommendations are based on current site conditions and our understanding of the proposed construction. If the site is modified by grading or the location of the proposed fa- cility is changed, our office should be contacted to review these changes and provide addi- tional recommendations as appropriate. It should also be noted that the recommendations presented herein are in addition to, or modify the recommendations presented in our ear- lier report for this project (Appendix A, Reference 1), and should therefore be read only in conjunction with the earlier report. Earthwork o Fill Materials The onsite formational materials and beach deposits are generally suitable for use as compacted fill, provided they are free of debris. The existing fill materials, due to their apparent significant clay con- tent, are considered reusable only as backfill and in the uppermost 2 foot zone, to provide a semi-impermeable barrier for surface water migration into the deeper backfill. u Almgren & Koptionak October 26,1987 Project No. 100239-02 Foundations Unless a perimeter subdrain is installed at a lower elevation, and directed offsite, a groundwater elevation of +20 feet (MSL) should be considered for design. o Wet and Dry Well Foundation Mat and Walls We recommend that the foundation mat and walls be designed for the uplift and lateral pressures shown on Figure 3A, "Lateral and Uplift Pressure Diagrams." o Generator Foundation The loads of the generator structure may be transferred to the under- lying dense beach deposits, rather than to the formational materials, as recommended in our previous report This can be accomplished by removing the undocumented fill to the top of the beach deposits, re- placing it with structural fill and using conventional footings and slab- on-grade (Option A in earlier report), or by deepening the footings to bear 1 foot minimum into the beach deposits and using a structural slab (Option C in the earlier report). Supporting the building frame on drilled piers (Option B of the earlier report) is not considered eco- nomically viable due to the relative shallowness of the fill. Detailed recommendations on Options A and C are presented in the earlier report. . . . Drainage Should significant economies result from lowering the design groundwater level, a perimeter subdrain at a lower elevation can be installed. Modified design pressure diagrams can be prepared to reflect the modified subdrain Almgren & Koptionak October 26,1987 Project No. 100239-02 elevation. General recommendations for design of underground drainage are presented in the earlier report. Construction Considerations o Shoring Due to the close proximity of the adjacent trickling filter structure, it is recommended that the portion of well excavation below 15 feet (i.e., in the formation) not be laid back, but be shored. The proximity of other settlement sensitive underground structures may otherwise guide selection of shoring or laying back of excavation slopes. Laid back slopes should in all cases be at slope ratios no steeper than 1:1 (horizontal to vertical). o Special Precautions The close proximity of the power line guywire anchors to the west of the site should be considered prior to planning the excavation. Construction Observation The recommendations provided in this report are based on conditions disclosed by our sub- surface investigation. The interpolated subsurface conditions should be checked in the field during construction. We recommend that final project drawings be reviewed by our office prior to construction. We recommend that all footing excavations be observed by a representative of our firm, and that testing and observation of fill placement be performed by a representative of this firm to evaluate compliance with recommendations provided in this and the earlier report. Almgren & Koptionak October 26,1987 Project No. 100239-02 The field investigation, laboratory testing and geotechnical analysis presented in this report have been conducted in accordance with current engineering practice. Our observations are based on one test boring located on the site and our recommendations reflect the con- ditions encountered therein. Variations may exist, and conditions not observed nor de- scribed in this report may be encountered during construction. If conditions different from those described in this report are encountered, this office should be notified and additional recommendations, if applicable, should be requested. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service, and if you should have any questions re- garding this matter please contact this office. Very truly yours, NINYO & MOORE Jan A. Dahlgren Associate V bV V4*^U& < T « +t V&-K-J v^AAt Principal Geologist X""/E. Moore, RCE 281 Principal JAD/SWJ/REM/eg Distribution: (2) Address REFERENCE: 1986 Aerial Foto-Map Book. 2000 Scale In Feet 4000 NORTH SITE LOCATION MAP CITY OF CARLSBAD PUMP STATION FACILITY CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 100239-02 DATE 10/87 FIGURE 1 A TRICKLING FILTER B-1A LEGEND Approximate location of exploratory boring BASE MAP IS AN UNTITLED, UNDATED SKETCH, FURNISHED BY ALMGREN & KOPTIONAK. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. NORTH 20 Approximate Scale in Feet 40 SITE PLAN CITY OF CARLSBAD PUMP STATION FACILITY CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO 100239-02 DATE 10/87 FIGURE 2A u tt V u Finish grade Elevation +20 MSL Bottom of Mat Elevation 60.YPSF J ,.i i 'J i -i 62.4X X PSF 91.2XX \ \ \ \ ASSUMED CONDITIONS 1. At ml condttlom Ko equate 0 2. Ysoll (moist) equate 120 PCF NOT TO SCALE LATERAL AND UPLIFT PRESSURE DIAGRAMS CITY OF CARLSBAD PUMP STATION FACILITY CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO, 100239-02 DATE 10/87 FIGURE 3 A APPENDIX A Almgren & Koptionak October 26,1987 Project No. 100259-02 APPENDIX A References 1. Ninyo & Moore, 1987, "Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Pump Station, City of Carlsbad, North of Intersection of State Street and Carlsbad Boulevard, Carlsbad, California," dated April 30. 2. Untitled, undated site topography and sketches of facility location, furnished by Almgren & Koptionak. 3. Almgren & Koptionak, Inc, untitled, undated, schematic drawing of facility plan and sections. APPENDIX B MAJOR DIVISIONS COARSE GRAINED SOILS(More then 1/2 ol «oH > no. 2OO »t*v« »lx«)•Xm e *•"5 wedo0"«ds: 1! go uS5I •o 3 GRAVELS (More then 1/2 of co art* friction > no. 4 ileve lilt) SANDS (Mor* thin 1/2 of coirte friction <^ no. 4 ileve »lze> SILTS & CLAYS LL < 50 SILTS & CLAYS LL > 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS SYMBOLS GW GP GM GC SW SP SM sc ML CL OL MH CH OH Pt TYPICAL NAMES We* graded grave* or oreveHeand mtaturoe, tot* or no fto*« Poorly graded grevele or gravet-iend mlituree. little or no linn Sllty gravele. grtYiJ-tind-illt mixture! Clayey gravele, grave(-«end-etay mixture* Wtll grtdtd *cnd* or grtvtUy «tnd«, IIUI* or no 1tn»t Poorly gridid undo or gravelly undi, llttto or no fln»« Sllty iindt, itnd-tllt mlxturta Sliyty ••ndt, und-clty mixturit Inorganic •»»• ind very tin* ttndt. rock flour, sllty or cltyty flno imdi or cltyty illtl wtth iKgM pUstkKy inorginlo eUyi of low to medium plutlclty. gravelly cltyi. • indy efeyi, illty clcyi, (tin eUye Orgi"le eilti tnd orgtnlo *tRy cltya of low pbittcKy Inorgante iHti, mteiceoue or dlatomaceou* fin* eandy or iflty lollc. elettlo allli Inorgenlo claye of high plaetklty. fat claya Organic clay* ot medium to high pliatlclty. organic itfty claye. organic illtt Peat and other highly organlo lode CLASSIFICATION CHART (Unified Soil Classification System) CLASSIFICATION BOULDERS COBBLES GRAVEL coaria line SAND coara* medium fin* SILT & CLAY RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES U.S. Standard Slevo Size Abov* 12" 12" to 3" 3" to Ho. 4 »" !• J/4" 9/4" t« N«. 4 No. 4 to No. 200 H». 4 |« H«. 10 N«. 10 t« H«. 40 H«. 40 1* N«.JOO Below No, 200 Grain. Size In Millimeter* Above 308 306 to 70.2 78.2 to 4.78 TI.I u ie.t te.t t« 4.re 4.70 to 0.074 4.r* t« i.oo t.OO U 0.410 0.4>0 I* O.OM Below 0.074 60 40 ± 50 - 20 10 CL MLry^ML a OLI CH MH a OH GRAIN SIZE CHART 10 20 30 40 90 60 LL (L!««U Limit), % PLASTICITY CHART 70 10 U.S.C.S. METHOD OF SOIL CLASSIFICATION DEPTH (Feet) 15- ^ —• 15- 20-SAMPLESjf3m .DrivenBLOWS/FOOTMOISTURE (%)?„*. * X.*DRY DENSITY (PCF)(Qro- F CLASSIFICATIONU.S.C.S.DATE DRILLED BORING NO. GROUND ELEVATION SHEET OF METHOD OF DRILLING DRIVE WEIGHT DROP SAMPLED BY 1 OGGED BY DESCRIPTION j "Standard penetration test • • -/y/nyovty BORING LOGoore1^^^ ^^B^ Explanation of Boring Log PROJECT NO. DATE RQURE s 0LL frUJo 5- 10- 20 HM < "3 ^~i — " ,t o Es e _> ba j ! ! . M1 1L W 03 ••••*••* 29 42 49 IJSJ|fft 5 iu W O3 hH» MM*** L3.4 L2.5 5.6 7.0 3.4 3.0 11.9 11.7 s_*^ Oa > UJ >oco •«•* m^m^ 106.3 105.5 104.6 iio.i 111.2 109.0 117.9 fl/A 2 < w $» *$W =< o ]sc ML/CL SM SM SM-ML M Msy\ DATE DRILLED 10/19/87 BORING NO. B-1A GROUND ELEVATION 31'- (MSL) SHEET 1 OF 2 METHOD OP DRILLING 6" Diameter Hollow Stem Auger (2) DRIVE WEIGHT 140 Ibs . nROP 30" SAMPLED BY RAR ' f^fiKfn BV RAB DESCRIPTION FILL: Brown, damp, firm, sandy CLAY with gravels. Brown to dark brown, damp, firm, clayey SILT and brown, dry, silty CLAY; some sand. BEACH DEPOSITS: Mottled gray-green to gray-brown, damp, dense, slightly silty, fine-grained SAND; occasional zones with orange iron oxides. Becomes brown-orange , increase in oxides at 6.5 feet. Becomes gray-green with occasional layers of coarse-grained sand and zones of black minerals at 10.0 feet. Siltier, trace to some clay. SANTIAGO FORMATION: Interbedded, green-gray, damp to moist, silty, coarse-grained SANDSTONE and coarse-grained, sandy SILTSTONE; weakly cemented. - CONTINUED - BORING LOG L%P^B» ^P^^_ Carlsbad Pump Station City of Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE 100239-02 10/87 FIGURE B X DEPTH (Feet) I20- 25- 30- 35- 40 Bulk ~...~. ff.^ . SAMPLESDriven {; ; -; ' ! i BLOWS/FOOT100-4 LOCH LQQ4 MOISTURE (%)10.5 18.2 12.0 11.4 DRY DENSITY (PCF)118.3 123,5 CLASSIFICATIONU.S.C.S.DATE DRILLED 10/19/87 BORING NO. B"1A GROUND ELEVATION 31'~ <MSL) SHEET 2 OF 2 METHOD OF nmi i lun 6" Diameter Hollow Stem Auger (2) DRIVE WEIGHT 14° lbs ' DROP 3°" SAMPLED BY BAB LOftRPp ny BAB DESCRIPTION SANTIAGO FORMATION: Interbedded, green-gray, damp to moist, silty, coarse-grained SANDSTONE and coarse-grained, ^ sandy SILTSTONE; weakly cemented. Total Depth =35.5 feet. Apparent ground water @ approximately 30.0 feet. {1} Backfilled 10/19/87. NOTES : 1. Added water to hole at approximately 15.0 feet. 2. Changed from hollow stem auger to solid stem auger at approximately 17.0 feet. _jy/nyo«/y\BORING LOG »J^jr ^5^^_ Carlsbad Pump Station City of Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. DATE C,*M,M » o100239-02 10/87 FIGURE B-^