The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About138 CHESTNUT AVE; ; CB000623; Permit08-14-2007 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB000623 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 138 CHESTNUT AV CBAD RESDNTL 2041220800 $489,471.00 1 2 0 Sub Type: Lot #: Construction Type: Reference #: Structure Type: Bathrooms: CONDO 0 VN MF2-4 0 2 CONDO'S 138 & 140 CHESTNUT 4779 SF+2744 GAR+1450 SF DECKS.DEMO 3 UNITS Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved- Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check#: FINAL 02/23/2000 JM 02/22/2001 02/22/2001 PY Applicant: DAVIS WAYNE 204 343 FOURTH STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 619-232-5990 Owner: BLUE BARRY J&MARYT PO BOX 1094 BONSALLCA 92009 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee HMP Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,986.08 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,290.95 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $48.95 PFF (3105540) $0.00 PFF (4305540) $0.00 License Tax (3104193) $0.00 License Tax (4304193) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00- ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $0.00 -Housing Impact Fee ?? Housing InLieu Fee $3,420.00 Housing Credit Fee D3/4 Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $90.00 $1,871.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $316.00 $110.00 $111.00 $0.00 $9,030.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 ($1,257.00) $19,516.98 Total Fees: $19,516.98 Total Payments To Date:$19,516.98 Balance Due:$0.00 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. 02/22/2001 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No:CB000623 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 140 CHESTNUT AV CBAD RESDNTL 2041220800 $489,471.00 1 2 0 Sub Type: Lot #: Construction Type: Reference #: Structure Type: Bathrooms: CONDO 0 VN MF2-4 0 2 CONGO'S 140 & 142 CHESTNUT Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: 4779 SF+2744 GAR+1450 SF DECKS.DEMO 3 UNITS Plan Check#: Applicant: DAVIS WAYNE 204 343 FOURTH STREET SAN DIEGO CA 92101 619-232-5990 Owner: BLUE BARRY J&MARY T PO BOX 1094 BONSALL CA 92009 ISSUED 02/23/2000 JM 02/22/2001 02/22/2001 2418 02/22/01 0002 01 02 UGP 18781.68 Total Fees: $19,876.98 Total Payments To Date: $1,095.30 Balance Due: $18,781.68 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,986.08 Meter Size, $0.00 Add'l Red. Water Con. Fee $1,290.95 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $48.95 PFF "-.•? $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 License Tax $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 LFMZ Transportation Fee $0.00 SideyvalkFee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 , MECHANICAL TOTAL $2,400.00 Housing Impact Fee D5/8 Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Master Drainage Fee: $0.00 , Sewer Fee:- TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $80.00 $1,871.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $316.00 $110.00 $111.00 $0.00 $9,030.00 $0.00 $2,500.00 $19,876.98 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date L'//3/62— I * Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE/hat approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. ^PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Depos[t Validated By ; / Business Name (afThiJ-erddress) Subdivision Name/NumberLegal Description Assessor's Parcel # Description of Work 2." CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant) Name ' Address 3. APPLICANT D Contractor Q Agent for Contractor D Owner City ,gent for Owner Fax # Name 4. PROPERTY OWNER" Address City State/Zip Telephone # Name Address State/Zip ( Telephone # (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any fetructure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500)1. Name State License # Designer Name State License # 6. WORKERS' COMPENSATION ~~ Address License Class Address City State/Zip City Business License # City State/Zip Telephone ff Telephone '•->. ' Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: C] I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. f~l I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) PI CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE * ION .. , ,. , .., _ ___ __,_ ^j5her«by^.fimLthatU,ajT^£xeHTipt.from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: ' |~l I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale '(' (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold'within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). Jj0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The 'Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). dl I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement, d YES QNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): mate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone4. I plan to provide portions of the number / contractors license numberl 5. I will provide some of the wo/k, but I have cqi .of work): ^^^^ ig persons torovide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type Is the applicant or future building occtl|iiiiil nii|iiimrt rTTsuymit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 2553^>f the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? O YES O NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? O YES f~l NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? O YES I") NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8", CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY ,_...* . "~. .„. ,L . ..... I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S ADDRESSLENDER'S NAME _ _ 9~ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the buttding^Dffl^ial under the provisions' this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commences withiwreo days from the date^TsuCTi permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commencepr forj^^Hpd^rf^kjCLclgyS (S^gjfon 1p6vL4 Uniforp>Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE =flTE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 -1. FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date . Address (include Bldg/Suite tt)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total tt of units Assessor's Parcel ^ Existing Use Proposed Use Description of Work'' 2. .CONTACT PERSONJifdifferent from applicant) SO. FT.#of Stories tt of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms C-vftC-^-^i ' / *"*""-760 Name / Address "City 3, APPLICANT, Q Contractor Q, Agent for Contractor Q Owner Q Agent for Owner State/Zip Telephone tt Fax* Name 4. PROPERTY OWNER Address City State/Zip Telephone tt Address City State/Zip Telephone ItName 5. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name State License tt Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone tt Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License tt 6. WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: l~l I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. l~l I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) l~l CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTJQfli'l lifei Lifythat in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subjeCTto the TjWfkersCompensation Laws offiSfifor/iia. WARNING^ Failure to/iecure workers' compensation/average Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civiLfines up to one hundred thousanp dollars ISJf&P^jWjS addition to the cosfof (compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of tbe-^aboj/fcode. interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE S*J-tr- ¥~ ' " , _r — , NER-BfjILDER DECI^FJA-flO^r ' / ,l hereby afrtmwthaLLaEii^rernpt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:« /f • fy& I, as owner of the'property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions'Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). l~l I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property"wtio builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). O I arn exempt under Section - Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. l~| YES l~lNO 2. I (have / have' riot) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions ofth, number / contractors license pafnber): , but I have Ithe following i on to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone 5. I will provide some ofi'the work, but I/Have contractaq (hiredl/fne ftllowingNpersons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): hireoVfif DATEv. r PROPERTY OWNER SIGN/S COMPLETE THIS SECTION I ftIs the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? d YES d NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? d YES d NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? [~l YES l~l NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS ,9. I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGRE|_Ip SAVE. INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSESWHICH M, OSHA: An OSHA permjffifrequired for e5fca*3fions duer 5'0 EXPIRATION: Eyec/permit issued byxtne Building Official authorized by sucVpermit is not commenced within 180 at any time after /ne work is conynjncpffrffba period o/1 APPLICANT'S S .GAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT: ilition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. s of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work the date of slich permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned DATE YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD Plan Check #: Permit#: Project Name: Address: Contact Person: Sewer Dist: Inspected By: 'fifol Inspected Bv: Inspected Bv: CB000623 2 CONDO'S 138 & 140 CHESTNUT 4779 SF+2744 GAR+1450 SF DECKS.DEMO 138CHESTNUTAV Phone: CA Water Dist: CA Date / 'rt C^/^/E^ Inspected: -V <?// Date Inspected: Date Inspected: StLite Fire \ M« Date: , . : Permit Type: Sub Type: 3 UNITS Lot: 0 / ^ ' *- Approved: "^-"""^ Approved: Approved: f ^ \ t--O i 05/30/2002 RESDNTL CONDO ^Disapproved: Disapproved: Disapproved: Comments: Inspection List Permit*: CB000623 Type: RESDNTL CONDO Date Inspection Item 05/29/2002 89 05/28/2002 19 05/28/2002 89 01/09/2002 23 01/09/2002 27 01/03/2002 17 01/03/2002 17 01/03/2002 18 01/02/2002 17 12/27/2001 16 12/11/2001 92 12/06/2001 84 11/15/2001 13 11/15/2001 14 11/15/2001 17 11/09/2001 16 11/02/2001 13 11/02/2001 22 11/02/2001 34 10/22/2001 13 10/22/2001 15 10/19/2001 15 10/10/2001 11 09/25/2001 66 09/17/2001 13 09/17/2001 15 09/17/2001 63 08/22/2001 11 07/17/2001 22 07/17/2001 63 07/03/2001 21 06/28/2001 21 06/25/2001 32 06/25/2001 62 06/13/2001 11 06/12/2001 11 06/11/2001 11 05/22/2001 66 05/10/2001 66 05/02/2001 11 05/01/2001 11 Final Combo Final Structural Final Combo Gas/Test/Repairs Shower Pan/Roman Tubs Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Exterior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/Drywall Insulation Compliance Investigation Rough Combo Shear Panels/HD's Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Interior Lath/Drywall Insulation Shear Panels/HD's Sewer/Water Service Rough Electric Shear Panels/HD's Roof/Reroof Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Grout Shear Panels/HD's Roof/Reroof Walls Ftg/Foundation/Piers Sewer/Water Service Walls Underground/Under Floor Underground/Under Floor Const. Service/Agricultural Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Grout Grout Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Inspector Act PY PY PY JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC PY JC JC JC JC JC PY JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC PA CO CO AP AP AP PA AP PA AP CO AP PA we PA PA AP AP PA NR AP CO AP AP NR NR NR AP we AP AP NR AP AP CA AP PA AP PA PA NR 2 CONGO'S 138 & 140 CHESTNUT 4779 SF+2744 GAR+1450 SF DECKS.DEM Comments NEED ALL DEPTS SEE LIST ATTACHED RATED LID FIRST LAYER IN GARAGE ONLY FIRE SPRINKLERS DO NOT HAVE A APPRVD PLAN - DO NOT INSULATE PARTY WALL PARTY WALLCB01 3543 PARTY WALL OK TO SHEAR OK TO WRAP 2 HR WALL ONLY SEE NOTICE ATTACHED STAIRS AT ENTRY PERIMETER WALLS & PLASTER DRAINS INTERIOR FTGS EXTERIOR NEED SOILS REPORT Thursday, June 13, 2002 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 05/29/2002 Permit# CB000623 Title: 2 CONGO'S 138 & 140 CHESTNUT Description: 4779 SF+2744 GAR+1450 SF DECKS.DEMO 3 UNITS Inspector Assignment: PY Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT DAVIS WAYNE Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: CONDO 138 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Phone: 7608458508 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: DOUG WILLIAMS Entered By: CHRISTINE Comments Associated PCRs Date 01/09/2002 01/09/2002 01/03/2002 01/03/2002 01/03/2002 01/02/2002 12/27/2001 12/11/2001 Inspection History Description 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 16 Insulation 92 Compliance Investigation Act AP AP AP PA AP PA AP CO Insp JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC 12/06/2001 84 Rough Combo AP JC 11/15/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's PA JC 11/15/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC JC 11/15/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PA JC 11/09/2001 16 Insulation PA PY 11/02/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP JC 11/02/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service AP JC Comments RATED LID FIRST LAYER IN GARAGE ONLY FIRE SPRINKLERS DO NOT HAVE A APPRVD PLAN - DO INSULATE PARTY WALL PARTY WALLCB01 3543 PARTY WALL OK TO SHEAR OK TO WRAP NOT City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 05/28/2002 Permit# CB000623 Title: 2 CONDO'S 138 & 140 CHESTNUT Description: 4779 SF+2744 GAR+1450 SF DECKS.DEMO 3 UNITS Inspector Assignment: JC Sub Type: CONDOType: RESDNTL Job Address: 138 CHESTNUT AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT DAVIS WAYNE Owner: Remarks: Phone: 7608458508 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: DOUG CD 19 29 39 49 Entered By: CHRISTINE Description Act Comments A Final Structural Cj^ V/^? ( SgrT • Final Piumbing Final Electrical Final Mechanical - Associated PCRs Date 01/09/2002 01/09/2002 01/03/2002 01/03/2002 01/03/2002 01/02/2002 12/27/2001 12/11/2001 Inspection Historv Description 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 27 Shower Pan/Roman Tubs 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 16 Insulation 92 Compliance Investigation Act AP AP AP PA AP PA AP CO Insp JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC 12/06/2001 84 Rough Combo AP JC 11/15/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's PA JC 11/15/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC JC 11/15/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall PA JC 11/09/2001 16 Insulation PA PY 11/02/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP JC 11/02/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service AP JC Comments RATED LID FIRST LAYER IN GARAGE ONLY FIRE SPRINKLERS DO NOT HAVE A APPRVD PLAN - DO NOT INSULATE PARTY WALL PARTY WALLCB013543 PARTY WALL OK TO SHEAR OK TO WRAP CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE NOTICE (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE LOCATION TIME PERMIT NO. •LJb djCjSi»3S&alBieJji.-.iy;:?x', \.-\ ^y^'.' - '. •. ••; - i-/ ;. •! FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION-FEE DUE?. FORTyF^ERjINFORI/ATION, CONTACT ' ". YES IN, CONTACT >72,876 PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ® City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 01/03/2002 Permit* CB000623 Title 2 CONDO'S 138 & 140 CHESTNUT Description: 4779 SF+2744 GAR+1450 SF DECKS,DEMO 3 UNITS Inspector Assignment: JC Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT DAVIS WAYNE Owner: Remarks: PM PLEASE Total Time: CD Description 17 Interior Lath/Dry wall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall Sub Type: CONDO 138 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Phone: 7608458508 Inspector: quested By: DOUG WILLIAMS Entered By: CHRISTINE Inspection History Date Description 12/27/2001 16 Insulation 12/11/2001 92 Compliance Investigation 12/06/2001 84 Rough Combo 11/15/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's 11/15/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 11/15/2001' 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 11/09/2001 16 Insulation PA 11/02/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP JC 11/02/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service AP JC 11/02/2001 34 Rough Electric PA JC 10/22/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's NR JC 10/22/2001 15 Roof/Reroof AP JC 10/19/2001 15 Roof/Reroof CO PY 10/10/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP JC 09/25/2001 66 Grout AP JC 09/17/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's NR JC 09/17/2001 15 Roof/Reroof NR JC 09/17/2001 63 Walls NR JC 08/22/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers . AP JC 07/17/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service WC JC Act Insp Comments AP JC CO JC FIRE SPRINKLERS DO NOT HAVE A APPRVD PLAN - DO NOT INSULATE AP JC PA JC PARTY WALL WC JC PA JC PARTY WALLCB013543 PY PARTY WALL OK TO SHEAR OK TO WRAP 2 HR WALL ONLY SEE NOTICE ATTACHED STAIRS AT ENTRY K, PERIMETER WALLS & PLASTER }.'' City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 11/14/2001 Permit# CB000623 Title: 2 CONGO'S 138 & 140 CHESTNUT Description: 4779 SF+2744 GAR+1450 SF DECKS.DEMO 3 UNITS Inspector Assignment: JC 138 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT DAVIS WAYNE Owner: Remarks: AT PARTYWALL Sub Type: CONDO Phone: 7608458508 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: DOUG Entered By: ROBIN CD Description 13 Shear Panels/HD's 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding uJ 4- 17 Interior Lath/Drywall flfl Act Comments f.ff Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp 11/09/2001 16 Insulation PA PY 11/02/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP JC 11/02/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service AP JC 11/02/2001 34 Rough Electric PA JC 10/22/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's NR JC 10/22/2001 15Roof/Reroof AP JC 10/19/2001 15Roof/Reroof CO PY 10/10/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP JC 09/25/2001 66 Grout AP JC 09/17/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's NR JC 09/17/2001 15 Roof/Reroof NR JC 09/17/2001 63 Walls NR JC 08/22/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP JC 07/17/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service WC JC 07/17/2001 63 Walls AP JC 07/03/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor AP JC 06/28/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor NR JC 06/25/2001 32 Const. Service/Agricultural AP JC 06/25/2001 62 Steel/Bond Beam AP JC Comments PARTY WALL OK TO SHEAR OK TO WRAP 2 HR WALL ONLY SEE NOTICE ATTACHED STAIRS AT ENTRY PERIMETER WALLS & PLASTER DRAINS Sent by: CONST. PROD. WP/FP,617 498 4419;11/07/01 7:15PM;./ertax #319jPage 2/3 SECTION A-A 1. Chose wall assembly 1A. 2x6 in. or double 2x4 in. lumber studs. 18, Sole Plate - Norn. 2x6 in. or two parallel 2x4 in. lumber 1C. Min. 3/4 in. lumber or plywood subfloor with a max. 2 in. diameter penetrant opening. 10. Nominal 2x10 in. lumbar joists. 1E. Doubt* top plate consisting of two 2x6 in. or two sets of parallel 2x4 in. lumber plates. 1F. Two layers of gypsum wollboord capable of providing a 2 hr. F rating (located on all walls and ceilings of chase system). 2. Panetront 2A. One or more of the following can be used. I. Max. 100 pair 24 AWG copper conductor telecom cables. II. Max. 2/C with ground No. 12 AWG copper conductor cable (12-2 Rome*). III. Max. RG/U No. 22 AWG copper conductor coaxial cable. IV. Max. 3/C with ground No. 2/0 AWG aluminium service entrance cable (SER). V. Max. 2/C No. 24 AWG copper conductor cable, Annular space - Min. 1/8 in. to max. 1/4 in. between each cable and between cables and edge of opening. 3. Rrestopping - FlameSafe* FS 19OO Series S«al0nt. 3A. At floor surface, Opply FS 1900 3/4 in. deep into annular space with a 1/4 in. crown. 3B. At bottom of top plate apply 1900 3/4 in. deep into annular spsce with a 1/4 in. crown. NOTES 1. System design evaluated to the ASTM ES14 (UL 1479) Fire Tests of Through—Penetration Ftrestops. 2. Design basad upon tested configurations by nationally recognized testing laboratories (e.g. UL, FM. etc.) OB well as in—house testing. Construction Products Assembly Approved by John Goge C.E- Project: Drawn by JOB Charland WLE. Product: FlameSafe FS 1900 Series Sealant Approval: Fire Rating: UL System: IPC Drawing j 2 HOUR FC3020 f FC3020 Installer: Data: Rev.jf OOO 3-203 1330 Industry Road, HatfteU, FA 19440 TbD Free: 80&334-87M> Td: 215-362-9020 Toll Free Fax: 888-531*5192 E-mail info@flamesafe.com Wa liupe the information not will he V4pml. IT is bawid on lUu Hid knoM/ledge cnnaittlcO to he VUe dad tnuumlc tad ii offered frvr ttw ntltft connklcrelkni, invcxtignliiin mid wrifi«ftri«i>. bill WC do nd wwnnl Ike mulu In b« ntatinul. Haue rend all umcnicnUi. ntummciuiailoiui o' .MEfie*li«n< in eoi\juiii:Iiaa with uur ConJniixu n^,$«)e wtiuh tpply 10 nil goad* supplied hy u>. Mn •taremeiu, rocoaimcddaliun or tug- g^ktion in inMixWd frr jr» une whleh would infringe iiny pubnl or cupyright. W. R. Cause *. tiv.-Conn. 62 Wtnutmnio Aveniia. ruuhrideA WA OS 140. Sent by: CONST. PROD. WP./FP,617 4§fl 4419;11/07/01 #319;Page 3/3 OT 1 SECTION A-A 1. Floor-ceiling ossemblv 1A. Min. 3/4 in. lumber or plywood subfloor with a max. 2 in. diameter penatrant opening. IB. Nominal 2x10 in. lumber joists or trusses (wood or steel). 1C. Two layers of gypsum wo 11 board capable of providing a 2 Hr. F rating. 2. Panatrant 2A. One or mare of the following can be used. I. Max. 100 pair 24 AWG capper conductor telecom cables. II. Max. 2/G with ground No. 12 AWG copper conductor cable (12—2 Ramex). III. Max. RG/U No. 22 AWG copper conductor coaxial cable. IV. Max. 3/C with ground No. 2/0 AWG aluminum service entrance cable (SER). V. May. 2/C No. 24 AWG copper conductor cable. Annular space - Win. 1/8 in. to max. 1/4 in. between each cable ond between cable* and edge of opening. 3. Fireatoppino^ - FldmeSafe® FS 1 flOO Series Sealant. 3A. At floor surface, apply FS 1900 3/4 in. deep into annular space and add a 1/4 in. crcwn. 3B. At ceiling surface, apply FS 1900 5/B in. deep into annular apace and add a 1/4 in. crown. NOTES __ 1. System design evaluated to the ASTM E814 (UL 1479) Fire Testa of Through-Penetration Rrestops. 2. Design based upon tested configurations by nationally recognized testing laboratories (e.g. UL, FM, etc.) as well OS tasting. GRACE Flrestop Assembly Approved by John Goga C.E- Projaci: Drawn by Joo Charland M-E. 1330 Industry Road, HatfUld, PA 19440 Tdl Free: 800-33447!* lei: 215^162-9020 Toll Free Fax: 888-531-5192 E-mail infft@flamesafe.com Product: FlamaSafe FS 1900 Series Sealant Approval: Fire Rating: 2 HOUR Installer: UL System: FC3018 Date: IPC Drawing f FC3018 Rev.f 000 We hapu iho mrtvnuiiimt licitt »ill ko halpAil li in biin>1 nn rti»Ui und knuwlcdHK cnmiden-rt en ho tnu and actuiWe nnd if offered fnt iho utcr'K C0iuidcn>|i«<i. inwuitjiliun Uld vcfifiMI/nn. hui on liu nul wnmint iKe roailu to tw obuincd. IMtfaKC rcid ))|l ftliiTemenbt, ruLiHlulWndniinnft nr ttuggeKliufu in cunjuncliun wirh our renditions of Sale »tlieti n(iply to M gnndii Moppliud by UN No nwenuni. rtcommcndutM nr mig- tenaan n intonikd tot any at* which would infrinp; iny parent or oopyTiuni. W. P. (lr«c= A Co.-Conn. 62 Whilk-muic A-cn.«. Cjanhrid^i. MA 021-40, 3-201 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 10/22/2001 Permit# CB000623 Title: 2 CONGO'S 138 & 140 CHESTNUT Description: 4779 SF+2744 GAR+1450 SF DECKS.DEMO 3 UNITS Inspector Assignment: JC Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT DAVIS WAYNE Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: CONDO 138 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Phone: 7608458508 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 13 Shear Panels/HD's 15 Roof/Reroof Requested By: DOUG Entered By: KARENromments Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description 10/10/2001 11 Ftg/Foundatibn/Piers 09/25/2001 66 Grout 09/17/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's 09/17/2001 15 Roof/Reroof 09/17/2001 63 Walls 08/22/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 07/17/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service 07/17/2001 63 Walls 07/03/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor 06/28/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor 06/25/2001 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 06/25/2001 62 Steel/Bond Beam 06/13/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 06/12/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 06/11/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 05/22/2001 66 Grout 05/10/2001 66 Grout 05/02/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 05/01/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act Insp Comments AP JC STAIRS AT ENTRY AP JC NR JC NR JC NR JC AP JC PERIMETER WALLS & PLASTER WC JC AP JC DRAINS AP JC NR JC AP JC AP JC CA JC AP JC PA JC INTERIOR FTGS AP JC EXTERIOR PA JC PA JC NR JC NEED SOILS REPORT City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 10/19/2001 Permit# CB000623 Title: 2 CONDO'S 138 & 140 CHESTNUT Description: 4779 SF+2744 GAR+1450 SF DECKS.DEMO 3 UNITS Inspector Assignment: JC Sub Type: CON DOType: RESDNTL Job Address: 138 CHESTNUT AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT DAVIS WAYNE Owner: Remarks: Phone: 7608458508 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 15 Roof/Reroof Act Comments '^Requested By: DOUG WILLIAMS Entered By: KAREN Associated PCRs i Inspection History Date Description 10/10/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 09/25/2001 . 66 Grout 09/17/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's 09/17/2001 15 Roof/Reroof 09/17/2001 63 Walls 08/22/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 07/17/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service 07/17/2001 63 Walls 07/03/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor 06/28/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor 06/25/2001 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 06/25/2001 62 Steel/Bond Beam 06/13/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 06/12/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 06/11/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 05/22/2001 66 Grout 05/10/2001 66 Grout 05/02/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 05/01/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act Insp Comments AP JC STAIRS AT ENTRY AP JC NR JC NR JC NR JC AP we AP AP NR AP AP CA AP PA AP PA PA NR JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC JC PERIMETER WALLS & DRAINS INTERIOR FTGS EXTERIOR NEED SOILS REPORT CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE NOTICE LOCATION PERMIT NO. CO —3ERMIT N4i (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE TIME £f> •:-j,:H:'{ ;v .1 'Wi •: ivy FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURHER INFORMATON, CONTACT . ' • YES BUILDINGJNSPECTOR PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 06/25/2001 Permit# CB000623 Title: 2 CONGO'S 138 & 140 CHESTNUT Description: 4779 SF+274*r<3AR+145(J SF DECKS.DEMO 3 UNITS Inspector Assignment: JC Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT DAVIS WAYNE Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: CONDO 138 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Phone: 7608458508 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 32 Const. Service/Agricultural 62 Steel/Bond Beam Requested By: DOUG WILLIAMS Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comments dP- Associated PCRs \^-7^*l-&rO( Inspection History Date Description 06/13/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 06/12/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 06/11/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 05/22/2001 66 Grout 05/10/2001 66 Grout 05/02/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 05/01/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act Insp Comments CA JC AP JC PA JC INTERIOR FTGS EXTERIORAP PA JC JC PA JC NR JC NEED SOILS REPORT Carl Schmidt Inspection P. O. Box 178403 Son Diego. CA 92177-8403 Phone (619) 855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT PROJECT: 3. ^/^ < /-€, ADDRESS: CITY: 1 /f JOB START: JOB STOP: PLAN FILE #: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: MASONRY REINFORCED CONCRETE FIELD WELDING EPOXY PRESTRESSED CONCRETE SHOP WELDING^ BOLTING REINFORCING STEEL FIREPROOFING SAMPLES: NUMBER: TYPE: - - - - Materials/Design Mix Numbers/PSI: Inspection Dote: </ REPORT /'*7 .a 7"r* f T To TED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED fofl- Project Billing Information: .... Certification^ Ssi i WOR Print Name si Phone: ( ) Fax:( ) inspector's Signature EsGil Corporation In TartnersHip with government for Quitting Safety DATE: 2/22/O1 a APPLICANT a JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-623 REV1 SET: REV 1, II PROJECT ADDRESS: 140 Chestnut PROJECT NAME: Condominium Duplex, Revised 1st & 2nd Floor Framing | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. | [ The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. I | The remarks below are transmitted herewith for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. Submit two sets of corrected sheets directly to EsGil Corp. for review. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. I I The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: J Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Wayne Davis Telephoned In Person Date contacted: 2/22/01 (by: CM) Fax #: / REMARKS: sheets S2 & S3 attached must be inserted into the city set of plans to make a complete 2nd set of approved plans. By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation Walk In EsGil Corporation In Tartnersfiip with government for 1$u.iC(Cing Safety DATE: 2/14/O1 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-623 REV1 SET: REV1, I PROJECT ADDRESS: 140 Chestnut PROJECT NAME: Condominium Duplex, Revised 1st Floor and 2nd Floor Framing The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The remarks below are transmitted herewith for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. Submit two sets of corrected sheets directly to EsGil Corp. for review. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Wayne Davis, Architect 343 4th Ave, Suite 204, San Diego, CA 92101 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan, check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Wayne Davis Telephone #: (619) 232-5990 Date contacted: <z7 tf/o; (by:^x) Fax #: (619) 232-5992 REMARKS: The purpose of this review was to correct a missing framing page from the approved plans. This was overlooked at the last plans review. Generally the framing agrees with the original design but the following were found inconsistent with the original design. A. There is no beam beneath the heavy shear wall at the 2nd floor between units. See revised sheets S2 & S3. B. The steel beams shown on sheet S2 are not consistent with the original design. FB-16 must be W10X26, FB15 -W10X15, FB-19-W10X22, FB-20-W10X26, FB- 17-W10X54', FB-15-W10X15. Revise the plans to be consistent with the original design. C. Plans must be signed by the architect assuming design responsibility By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation Walk In 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partners/lip with, government for fBui&fing Safety DATE: 6/28/00 , JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: OO-623 PROJECT ADDRESS: 14O Chestnut PROJECT NAME: Condominium Duplex a APPLICANT -PIAN REVIEWER Q FILE SET: VI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephoned Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Esgil Corporation GA D MB D EJ PC Enclosures: walk in trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 «• (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Tartntrsliip -WitH government for 'BuiCding Safety DATE: June 22, 2000 a APPLICANT a juRjir^ JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAtTREVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-623 SET:V PROJECT ADDRESS: 140 Chestnut PROJECT NAME: Condominium Duplex I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. IXl The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Davis Group 343 Fourth Ave., Suite 204, San Diego, CA 92101 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. 2<J Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Wayne Davis, Architect Telephone #: (619) 232-5990 Date contacted:LofiS/cro (by:<^X) Fax #: (619)232-5992 Mail \^ Telephone Faxc-- In Person ] REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall (SA) Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 6/20 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-623 V June 22, 2000 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 140 Chestnut DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 6/20 REVIEWED BY: Chuck Mendenhall (SA) PLAN CHECK NO.: OO-623 SET: V DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: June 22, 2000 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 00-623 V June 22, 2000 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 3. Original design calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 27. The 1st to 2nd floor shear walls designed on page 14 of the plans are not included on the structural plans. Shear wall designations on sheet S4 in the transverse direction are not consistent with what is shown on page 13 of the design calc's. It appears that seismic controls which requires type 6 & 7 shear walls at this level. They are not shown on sheet S4 of the plans. The 14 ft of type 8 shear wall designed on page 14 of the calc's is not shown on S3 of the plans. The 19 ft of type 7 shear wall designed on page 14 of the calc's is also not shown on sheet S3 of the plans. Clearly show on sheet S2 the location of the HD's for the type 8 and type 5 shear walls on the floor above shown on sheet S3. • THE DESIGN NOW SHOWS YOU ARE RELYING ON PREFABRICATED SIMPSON STRONG WALLS AT THESECOND FLOOR. THESE ARE SHOWN SUPPORTED BY WOOD BEAMS. THE ICBO APPROVAL FOR THE SIMPSON STRONG WALLS APPLIES TO SHEAR WALLS ON SLAB FOUNDATION OR RAISED WOOD WITH HD'S EXTENDING DIRECTLY TO THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION. THE APPLICATION AND APPROVAL OF THESE PREFABRICATED WALLS IS NOT APPROPRIATE OR APPROVED FOR THE CONDITION SHOWN ON THE PLANS. Carlsbad OO-623 V June 22, 2000 34. Provide a written explanation of how you intend to provide lateral support for Unit 'A' Living Rm and M Bed Rm all glass walls adjacent to the patio. The explanation indicates that the diaphragm of the Unit 'A' Living Rm and m Bed Rms cantilever from support walls. Page 14 of the original design calc's shows that there is 14ft long of type 8 shear wall supporting the cantilevered diaphragm. I can not find 14 ft of type 8 shear wall on sheet S3 of the plans. Also, there is no continuous drag shown framing along the floor into the type 8 shear walls. In addition provided a deflection analysis of the cantilevered diaphragm to show that drift will not adversely affect the building. Drift should be limited to .OOSXh • THE THEORY USED IN THIS DESIGN ASSUMES A STIFF SHEAR WALL THAT SUPPORT THE HORIZ DIAPHRAGMS. THE PLANS SHOW 3 PREFABRICAED SIMPSON STRONG WALLS NOT IN LINE. THE ASSUMPTION THAT THESE WALLS WILL ACT AS A UNIT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. ALSO, THE ROTATIONAL DESIGN ASSUMES THAT THER ARE SUFFICIENTLY STIFF CHORDS ALONG THE EDGE OF THE DIAPHRAGMS TO BUCKLING. YOU SHOW NO SHEAR WALLS AT THE ENTRY TO THE LIVING ROM OR FRONT OF THE M. BED RM. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. FINALLY YOU ARE RELYING ON SIMPSON STRONG WALLS TO RESIST ALL THE SHEAR OF THE LIVING ROOM AND MASTER BED ROOM. THESE WALLS ARE NOT APPROVED FOR USED ABOVE THE GRADE LEVEL OF THE BUILDING. YOU SHOW THESE SUPPORTED BY BEAMS ABOVE THE GARAGE. NOTE: THE ITEMS ABOVE STILL APPLY. YOUR COMMENT AS TO WHY THE SIMPSON STRONG WALLS MAY NOT BE USED IS BASED ON THE ICBO APPROVAL FOR THE PREFABRICATED SHEAR WALLS. THESE DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE UBC STANDARDS BUT WERE APPROVED BY ICBO BASED ON CYCLIC TESTING. THESE MUST BE INSTALLED PER THE REPORT. IF YOU CHOOSE TO USE BRACED FRAMES ON TOP OF WOOD BEAMS THIS IS OK BUT YOU MUST COMPLY WITH ALL THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BRACED FRAMES. NOTE THAT THE BEAM SUPPORTING THE BRACED FRAMES MUST BE DESIGNED FOR Qx THE REACTION PER UBC 1630.8.2.1. THE OTHER PROBLEM WITH THE DESIGN OF THE CANTILEVERED DIAPHRAGM HAS NOT BEEN SOLVED. THE WALLS RESISTING THE LOAD FROM THE DIAPHRAGM CANTILEVER ARE NOT IN THE SAME LINE. THIS DOES NOT ALOW FOR A CLEAR AND DIRECT LOAD PATH FOR THE DIAPHRAGM REACTION AND WITHOUT SIDE WALLS ALONG THE DIAPHRAGM EDGES BUCKLING OF THE DIAPHRAGM CAN NOT BE RESISTED. • SEE NEXT PAGE FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS Carlsbad 00-623 V June 22, 200O THE DESIGNER SHALL CLEARLY SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: • SECTION 2213.8.2.2. STRESS REDUCTION Fas =/J Fa. • SECTION 2213.8.2.3 LATERAL-FORCE DISTRIBUTION. • SECTION 2213.8.3 BRACING CONNECTION. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In Partners/tip vJitft government for 'Zuifding Safety DATE: 5/19/00 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-623 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 140 Chestnut PROJECT NAME: Condominium Duplex The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. | | The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. S The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Davis Group 343 Fourth Ave., Suite 204, San Diego, CA 92101 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Wayne Davis, Architect Telephone #: (619) 232-5990 Date contacted: s(f *? ta (by: fatf Fax #: (619) 232-5992 Mail c/ Telephone Fax«-^ In Person REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 5/11/00 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 * San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-623 5/19/00 NOTE: the items listed below refer to the items from the previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold a the end of each item is to emphasize the remaining problem. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 3. Original design calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). • STRUCTURAL 23. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. The truss roof layout plan must be signed and sealed by the engineer of record for the building or the truss design engineer. 27. The 1st to 2nd floor shear walls designed on page 14 of the plans are not included on the structural plans. Shear wall designations on sheet S4 in the transverse direction are not consistent with what is shown on page 13 of the design calc's. It appears that seismic controls which requires type 6 & 7 shear walls at this level. They are not shown on sheet S4 of the plans. The 14 ft of type 8 shear wall designed on page 14 of the calc's is not shown on S3 of the plans. The 19 ft of type 7 shear wall designed on page 14 of the calc's is also not shown on sheet S3 of the plans. Clearly show on sheet S2 the location of the HD's for the type 8 and type 5 shear walls on the floor above shown on sheet S3. Carlsbad OO-623 5/19/00 • THE DESIGN NOW SHOWS YOU ARE RELYING ON PREFABRICATED SIMPSON STRONG WALLS AT THESECOND FLOOR. THESE ARE SHOWN SUPPORTED BY WOOD BEAMS. THE ICBO APPROVAL FOR THE SIMPSON STRONG WALLS APPLIES TO SHEAR WALLS ON SLAB FOUNDATION OR RAISED WOOD WITH HD'S EXTENDING DIRECTLY TO THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION. THE APPLICATION AND APPROVAL OF THESE PREFABRICATED WALLS IS NOT APPROPRIATE OR APPROVED FOR THE CONDITION SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 34. Provide a written explanation of how you intend to provide lateral support for Unit 'A' Living Rm and M Bed Rm all glass walls adjacent to the patio. The explanation indicates that the diaphragm of the Unit 'A' Living Rm and m Bed Rms cantilever from support walls. Page 14 of the original design calc's shows that there is 14ft long of type 8 shear wall supporting the cantilevered diaphragm. I can not find 14 ft of type 8 shear wall on sheet S3 of the plans. Also, there is no continuous drag shown framing along the floor into the type 8 shear walls. In addition provided a deflection analysis of the cantilevered diaphragm to show that drift will not adversely affect the building. Drift should be limited to .OOSXh • THE THEORY USED IN THIS DESIGN ASSUMES A STIFF SHEAR WALL THAT SUPPORT THE HORIZ DIAPHRAGMS. THE PLANS SHOW 3 PREFABRICAED SIMPSON STRONG WALLS NOT IN LINE. THE ASSUMPTION THAT THESE WALLS WILL ACT AS A UNIT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. ALSO, THE ROTATIONAL DESIGN ASSUMES THAT THER ARE SUFFICIENTLY STIFF CHORDS ALONG THE EDGE OF THE DIAPHRAGMS TO BUCKLING. YOU SHOW NO SHEAR WALLS AT THE ENTRY TO THE LIVING ROM OR FRONT OF THE M. BED RM. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. FINALLY YOU ARE RELYING ON SIMPSON STRONG WALLS TO RESIST ALL THE SHEAR OF THE LIVING ROOM AND MASTER BED ROOM. THESE WALLS ARE NOT APPROVED FOR USED ABOVE THE GRADE LEVEL OF THE BUILDING. YOU SHOW THESE SUPPORTED BY BEAMS ABOVE THE GARAGE. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In TaTtnerskip with government for 'Buiftfing Safety DATE: 4/24/00 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-623 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 140 Chestnut PROJECT NAME: Condominium Duplex The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Davis Group 343 Fourth Ave., Suite 204, San Diego, CA 92101 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Wayne Davis, Architect Telephone #: (619) 232-5990 Date contacted: ^ [*//"& (by: fry) Fax #: (619) 232-5992 Mail <N^xTelephone Faxu^" In Person REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation n GA Q MB Q EJ Q PC 4/13/00 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 * (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad OO-623 4/24/00 NOTE: the items listed below refer to the items from the previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The notes in bold a the end of each item is to emphasize the remaining problem. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 3. Original design calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). • DECKING 10. Show deck overflow drains 2" above the deck low point. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. Roof overflow drains and/or scuppers are not shown on the roof deck. • GARAGE AND CARPORTS 11. Specify the ICBO approval # or other agency approval for the one hour floor ceiling assembly detailed in 1/D3. ICBO report NER 200 requires a min. of 2 layers of 1/2 type X drywall applied to the bottom of the TJI joists for a 1 HR fire rating. The detail 1/D3 shows one layer of 5/8 type 'X' drywall on the ceiling. • STRUCTURAL Carlsbad OO-623 4/24/OO 23. Without the 2nd floor framing plan I can not complete the structural plan review. There is no way I can determine where bearing walls and point loads occur. Header H-15 for Unit 'B' is designed for 5ft cantilever and 5ft support length. The plans show a max 3' at the support end with a 5ft cantilever. 24. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. Not provided. 26. The shear wall designations shown on page 13 of the design calc's for seismic loads are not consistent with what is shown on S3. Page 13 of the design calc's shows that seismic controls in the transverse direction. I do not shear walls types 7 & 6 in the transverse direction as shown at the bottom of page 13 of the original design calc's. 27. The 1st to 2nd floor shear walls designed on page 14 of the plans are not included on the structural plans. Shear wall designations on sheet S4 in the transverse direction are not consistent with what is shown on page 13 of the design calc's. It appears that seismic controls which requires type 6 & 7 shear walls at this level. They are not shown on sheet S4 of the plans. The 14 ft of type 8 shear wall designed on page 14 of the calc's is not shown on S3 of the plans. The 19 ft of type 7 shear wall designed on page 14 of the calc's is also not shown on sheet S3 of the plans. Clearly show on sheet S2 the location of the HD's for the type 8 and type 5 shear walls on the floor above shown on sheet S3. 29. Include in the design of the shear walls overturning of walls and any HD's that may be required. Clearly show by shading or some other means the location of the 3'-8", 2'-4" and 7'-4" masonry shear walls as designed on page 15 of the calc's. I could not find all these shear wall lengths in the transverse direction. 30. Include in the design calc's the drag connection detailed in 30/SD3. The drag connection must be designed for the seismic force load combinations outlined in UBC 1612.4. See UBC 1633.2.6. the design does not include the drag connection between the masonry walls and wood drag beams. 34. Provide a written explanation of how you intend to provide lateral support for Unit 'A' Living Rm and M Bed Rm all glass walls adjacent to the patio. The explanation indicates that the diaphragm of the Unit 'A' Living Rm and m Bed Rms cantilever from support walls. Page 14 of the original design calc's shows that there is 14ft long of type 8 shear wall supporting the cantilevered diaphragm. I can not find 14 ft of type 8 shear wall on sheet S3 of the plans. Also, there is no Carlsbad OO-623 4/24/00 continuous drag shown framing along the floor into the type 8 shear walls. In addition provided a deflection analysis of the cantilevered diaphragm to show that drift will not adversely affect the building. Drift should be limited to .OOSXh To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No a The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. In "Partnership with government for ViuiCding Safety DATE: 3/7/00 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-623 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 140 Chestnut PROJECT NAME: Condominium Duplex The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Davis Group 343 Fourth Ave., Suite 204, San Diego, CA 92101 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Wayne Davis, Architect Telephone #: (619)232-5990 Date contacted: 318 /o* (by; ^ ) Fax #: (619) 232-5992 Mail '—Telephone'-^' Fax ^In Person REMARKS: By: Chuck Mendenhall Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA D MB D EJ D PC 2/25/00 tmsmu.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ^ San Diego, California 92123 ^ (858)560-1468 ^ Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 00-623 3/7/OO PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: OO-623 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 140 Chestnut FLOOR AREA: 4779 dwelling units STORIES: two & basement HEIGHT: 27'-6" approx. REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/25/00 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Chuck Mendenhall COMPLETED: 3/7/OO FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list for a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UP list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad OO-623 3/7/OO 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 438-1161. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). 3. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). o EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 4. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): a) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. b) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. 5. Note on the plans that the winding stairway will comply with Section 1003.3.3.8.2: a) Minimum tread is 6 inches at any point and minimum 9 inches at a point 12 inches from where the treads are narrowest. b) Maximum rise is 8 inches. c) Minimum width is 36 inches. Carlsbad OO-623 3/7/00 6. Provide a full landing where the stairs from the interior stairs change direction. A full landing must be the full width of the stairs for a length of 36". • DECKING 7. Specify on the plans the following information for the elastomeric deck materials, per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Product name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. 8. Specify roof deck slope. 9. Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be sloped a minimum of % inch per foot for drainage. Section 1402.3. 10. Show deck overflow drains 2" above the deck low point. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. • GARAGE AND CARPORTS 11. Specify the ICBO approval # or other agency approval for the one hour floor ceiling assembly detailed in 1/D3. « NOISE INSULATION (DUPLEXES) 12. Show details of duplex common (party) walls to achieve a Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating in walls of 50 decibels and an Impact Insulation Class (IIC) rating on floor/ceiling of 50 decibels. Title 24. Reference the party wall detail to the floor plans. * ENERGY CONSERVATION 13. Show on the plans the under cabinet flourescent lighting in the kitchen switched at the entrance to the kitchen. 14. Sheet A9 of the plans shows a recirculating WH pump. The energy design did not include a recirculating pump. • FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 15. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, single- story dwellings. Section 1804.5 Carlsbad 00-623 3/7/OO 1Q. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 17. Dimension on the plans the foundations per the soil report. See A, B, C, D & F/SD1. These details refer to the soil report for dimensions but the soil report is not a part of the plans. 18. The following anchor bolt requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3 and 4, per Section 1806.6.1: Plate washers (minimum size of 2" x 2" x 3/16") shall be used on each anchor bolt. 19. Include in the design calc's the sizing of the spread footings supporting FB-10, FB-11 & FB-13. Detail the support of these three beams on 4-2X6 posts. 20. Design and detail on the plans spread footing for beam FB-11 & FB-20. 21. What active soil pressure was used in the design of the cantilevered retaining wall on page 11 of the calc's. There is a table and formulas shown but nothing indicating the loading or the stress limits of the masonry and steel. « STRUCTURAL 22. The roof framing plan, sheet S4, is the same as the 2nd floor framing plan on sheet S3.1 believe the 2nd floor framing plan is incorrect. The second floor framing plan should show the framing and the support walls at the first floor. 23. Without the 2nd floor framing plan I can not complete the structural plan review. There is no way I can determine where bearing walls and point loads occur. 24. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. 25. Per UBC Section 2321.4, provide the following note on the plans if trusses are used: "Each truss shall be legibly branded, marked or otherwise have permanently affixed thereto the following information located within 2 feet of the center of the span on the face of the bottom chord: a) Identity of the company manufacturing the truss. b) The design load. c) The spacing of the trusses." Carlsbad OO-623 3/7/00 26. The shear wall designations shown on page 13 of the design calc's for seismic loads are not consistent with what is shown on S3 27. The 1st to 2nd floor shear walls designed on page 14 of the plans are not included on the structural plans. 28. The masonry shear walls at the lower level must be designed to resist the seismic load X 1.5. See UBC 2107.1.7. See page 15 of the design calc's. 29. Include in the design of the shear walls overturning of walls and any HD's that may be required. 30. Include in the design of the masonry shear walls the hold down boundary steel and supporting grade beams. 31. Include in the design calc's the drag connection detailed in 30/SD3. The drag connection must be designed for the seismic force load combinations outlined in UBC 1612.4. See UBC 1633.2.6. 32. Include in the design and plan details the out-of-plane anchorage between the lower level masonry walls and the floor framing. See UBC 1633.2.8.1. 33. Include in the design calc's for the masonry shear wall the allowable shear stress based on the UBC standards. UBC 2107.2.9. 34. Provide a written explanation of how you intend to provide lateral support for Unit 'A' Living Rm and M Bed Rm all glass walls adjacent to the patio. 35. The stucco shear walls that you are relying on along the front elevation abut the stair wells of each unit. There is no way for the floor diaphragm to interact with the stucco shear walls along the front elevation. 36. Expand the redundancy calc's for the lower level masonry shear walls. The information provide is too sketchy to determine if you have followed the code requirements NOTE: A complete structural plan review will be completed when the items listed above are provided. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Carlsbad OO-623 3/7/00 Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes U No a The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Chuck Mendenhall at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 00-623 3/7/OO VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Chuck Mendenhall BUILDING ADDRESS: 140 Chestnut BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3/U1 PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-623 DATE: 3/7/00 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION II BUILDING AREA 1 (ft-2) Dwelling Units Garage Decks Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 4779 2744 1450 4779 VALUATION I VALUE MULTIPLIER I ($) 82 24 12 3 391,878 65,856 17,400 14,337 489,471 G 199 UBC Building Permit Fee H Bldg. Permit Fee by ordinance: $ 1986.07 G 199 UBC Plan Check Fee ffl Plan Check Fee by ordinance: $ 1290.94 Type of Review: 9 Complete Review G Structural Only G Hourly G Repetitive Fee Applicable G Other: Esgil Plan Review Fee: $ 1032.75 Comments: Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc 5196 City of Carlsbad Public :?Works — Engineering DATE: BUILDING ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB o5 EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please • review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. [A Right-cif-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Xx"T) DENIAL Please s0p the /attached report of deficiencies marked/vith D. Make necessary corrections to plans or spdpficatjprts for compliance with applicable codes ancTstandards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. Date: Date: By: Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: Date: ATTACHMENTS D Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist D Improvement Application D Improvement Checklist D Future Improvement Agreement D Grading Permit Application D Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application [] Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet 0 Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue Phone: (760) 602-2741 ' CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92OO8-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 6O2-8562 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1STV SITE PLAN 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A—Wofth Arrow frProperty Lines CL^ExTsting & Proposed Structures -Er^Easements Q^-Existing Street Improvements ^Fr^Rlght-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets J3^"t5riveway widths 2. Show on site plan: A^Drainage Patterns ^"^ 1. BuildinBuilding pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography 3. Include on title sheet: ^k. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number G<Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION a. DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No._ / - s9 S 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: H:\WORD\FARMER\KATHY\MASTERS\BulMing Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Form KF.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST "A DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS oND/ oRDy Q Q 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: ' Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $__ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: Q 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: H:\WORO\FARMER\KATHY\MASTERS\BuiMing PlanchB* Cklst BP0001 Form KF.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST Q Q Q 6c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: _ Date: ___ _ Q Q Q 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 1 1 .06.030 of the Municipal Code. 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: __ _ Date: Q 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) Q 7d. No Grading Permit required. Q 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS Q Q Q 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: H:\WORD\FARMER\KATHY\MASTERS\Buildino Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Form KF.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST •|St/ Q Q 9. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. Q 10. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: Q Q rj rj 11.NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 12.equired fees are attached No fees required 13. Local Facilities Management Zone Transportation Fee Agmt Signed. 14. Additional Comments: H:\WORD\FARMER\KATHY\MASTERS\Building Plancheck Cklst BP0001 Form KF.floc ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. : 0)S99-Ql- ''"' '** £_ . ^-> Address Prepared by: M,. Permit Date:Checked by: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of UseS—lKv.dU3 Sq. Ft.(oJnjts?s) Types of Use: _ Sq. Ft. /Units: APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: C_.CKv^LO Sq. FC/Unjt|? ""2 -- Types of Use:Sq. Ft. /Units: EDU's: EDU's: ADT's: ADT's: FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO D 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE FEE/UNIT: PARK AREA & #: X NO. UNITS: D 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT F X FEE/ADT: '' ZONE TRANSPORTATION ADT'S D 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 _ ADT's/UNITS: _ X FEE/ADT: X$10 DIST. #2 D 4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE UNIT/SQ.FT.: D 5. SEWER FEE PERMIT No. . EDU's: BENEFIT AREA: EDU's: ZONE: X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT:= $ D 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) D 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA * ACRES: X I DRAINAGE BASIN: X FEE/EDU:. : HIGH =$ /LOW X FEE/AC: TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ * NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permitsits. I ( Ji P:\DOCS\MISFORMS\FEECALCULATIONWORKSHEET REV 4/29/99 City of Carlsbad Public Works — Engineering July 29, 1999 Barry J. Blue c/o Pac-West Land Care, Inc. 2231 La Mirada Vista, Ca 92083 PROPOSED MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. MS 99-02,140 CHESTNUT CONDOMINIUM A preliminary decision has been made, pursuant to Section 20.24.120 of the City of Carlsbad Municipal Code, to approve the tentative parcel map of the proposed minor subdivision subject to conditions that follow in this letter. Unless specifically stated in the condition, all of the following conditions, upon the approval of this tentative parcel map, must be met prior to approval of a final parcel map. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer shall comply with the requirements of the City's anti-graffiti program for wall treatments if and when such a program is formerly established by the City. 2. ./O. Approval of MS 99-02 is granted subject to the approvaljv 99-02 is subject to all conditions of approval contained \ MS The developer shall provide the City with the approved tentative parcel map. The map shall be to scale on a reproducible 24" x 36" xerox mylar or photo mylar. It shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The reproducible shall be submitted to the City Engineer, reviewed and signed by the City's project engineer and project planner prior to submittal of the building plans, final map, improvement or grading plans, whichever occurs first The developer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision Map Act. The net developable acres shall be shown for each parcel. The developer shall pay all current fees and deposits required. The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holding the City harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property. Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall give written 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 431-5769 consent to the annexation of the area shown within the boundaries of the subdivision into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping District No. 1 on a form provided by the City. 9. The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative parcel map. The offer shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated. 10. Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be provided or installed prior to or concurrent with any grading or building permit as may be required by the City Engineer. 11. The developer shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private easements within the subdivision and all the private: streets, sidewalks, street lights, storm drain facilities and sewer facilities located therein and to distribute the costs of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties within the subdivision. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included in a recorded document subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 12. Rain gutters must be provided to convey roof drainage to an approved drainage course or street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 13. Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction site within this project, the developer shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the hauling operation. 14. No grading for private improvements shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or slope easement or agreement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties and recorded. If the developer is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, or agreement, no grading permit will be issued. In that case the developer must either amend the tentative map or modify the plans so grading will not occur outside the project site in a manner which substantially conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by the City Engineer and Planning Director. No driveway gates shall be installed without the approval of the City Engineer. The developer shall provide for sight distance corridors at all street intersections in accordance with Engineering Standards and shall record the following statement on the Final Map (and in the CC&R's). "No structure, fence, wall, tree, shrub, sign, or other object over 30 inches above the street level may be placed or permitted to encroach within the area identified as a sight distance corridor in accordance with City Standard Public Street-Design Criteria, Section 8.B.3. The underlying property owner shall maintain this condition." 17. The developer shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The developer shall provide best management practices as referenced in the "California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook" to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer. Said plans shall include but not be limited to notifying prospective owners and tenants of the following: A. All owners and tenants shall coordinate efforts to establish or work with established disposal programs to remove and properly dispose of toxic and hazardous waste products. B. Toxic chemicals or hydrocarbon compounds such as gasoline, motor oil, antifreeze, solvents, paints, paint thinners, wood preservatives, and other such fluids shall not be discharged into any street, public or private, or into storm drain or storm water conveyance systems. Use and disposal of pesticides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers and other such chemical treatments shall meet Federal, State, County and City requirements as prescribed in their respective containers. C. Best Management Practices shall be used to eliminate or reduce surface pollutants when planning any changes to the landscaping and surface improvements. Parcel Map Notes 18. Note(s) to the following effect(s) shall be placed on the parcel map as non-mapping data: 18a. Building permits will not be issued for development of the subject property unless the District Engineer determines that sewer facilities are available. Code Reminder 19. The tentative parcel map approval shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the date of the letter containing the final decision for tentative parcel map approval. 20. The project is approved under the express condition the developer pay the additional public facilities fee in accordance with City Council Resolution No. 9169 adopted July 28, 1987 and as amended from time to time. The developer further agrees to pay any development fees established by the City Council pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The developer's written agreement to pay said fees is on file with the office of the City Clerk and is incorporated herein by this reference. If the fees are not paid, this application will not be consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project shall be void. Water District 21. The Developer will be expected to provide detailed information to the District Engineer regarding water demand, irrigation demand, fire flow demand in gallons per minute, and projected sewer flow in million gallons per day. 22. The entire potable water system, recycled water system and sewer system shall be evaluated in detail by Developer and District Engineer to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands can be met. 23. All District pipelines, pump stations, pressure reducing stations and appurtenances required for this project by the District shall be within public right-of-way or within easements granted to the District or the City of Carlsbad. 24. Sequentially, the Developer's Engineer shall do the following: A. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection requirements. B. Prepare and submit a colored recycled water use area map and submit this map to the Planning Department for processing and approval by the District Engineer. C. Prior to the preparation of sewer, water and recycled water improvement plans, the Developer shall submit preliminary system layouts to the District Engineer for review, comment and approval. 25. All potable water and recycled water meters shall be placed within public right of way. 26. No more than 19 homes (dwelling units) shall be served on a single potable water distribution pipeline. For those locations with more than 19 homes (dwelling units), a looped potable water pipeline system shall be designed. The Developer should verify with the District Engineer that a looped system will not be required for this project. 27. If fire hydrant(s) are required by the Fire Marshal, a looped fire line system may be required for any fire line run greater than 150 feet. The Developer shall verify with the District that a looped fire line system will not be required for this project. The developer may request a review of the preliminary decision with the City Engineer in writing within ten (10) days of the date of this letter. Upon such written request the City Engineer shall arrange a time and place with the developer for such review. The City Engineer has reviewed each of the exactions imposed on the developer contained in these conditions of approval, and hereby finds, in this case, that the exactions are imposed to mitigate impacts caused by or reasonably related to the project, and the extent and degree of the exaction is in rough proportionality to the impact caused by the project. If you have any questions regarding the engineering issues of concern, you may contact David Rick at telephone 438-1161, extension 4324. If you have any questions regarding planning issues, you may contact Greg Fisher at (760)438-1161 extension 4328. ROBERT J. WOJCIK Principle Civil Engineer c: (letter only), David Rick, Greg Fisher *| 6 3Q. D D PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check N Planner APN: Address Phone (760) 602- Type of Project & Use: } Zoning: jt'3 General Plan: /^r/ Net Project Density: Facilities Management Zone: DU/AC CFD (in/nut) # Circle One Date of participation:Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: . ) Legend:/\ Item Complete Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: YES Item Incomplete - Needs your action y0 TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: ''_ Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO. PROJECT NO. TYPE OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or app Conditions of Approval:r /ot, state conditions which require action. | | LJ Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES >^ NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Ca 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): ^Coastal Permit Deterrmnation Form already . NO, completexCoastal Permit DeteTrRiQation Frn>rtw. Cocrsta4-Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst D Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES £_ NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements,y.existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. |J 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: rx r ""\ ^ SJ^LJ D 1- Setbacks: ( \ Front: ^- Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: \ il Hi 2. Accessory struc \ . Front: \ '-.'A. Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: ^ & ^ ' ' Required Required / Required Required ;ture setbacks: Required Required Required Required Structure separation: Required \J) I || | 3. Lot Coverage: \ 5MI] 4. Height: \ Required Required "f>|> II I 5. Parking: Spaces Required \ Guest \0, || | Additional Commer Spaces Required it, H.V. 9cL 'M UU\^l/\ f ( IS" t ( ^ Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown • Shown . --; Shown Shown , ZypW-oe/lc-DQw-fa,\5 ' ' ' i • - , n „ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVALX|NTO COMPUTER ^IM ill VE.DATE rtf-to H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst FA* E-MAll DAVSS GROUP 619.232.5990 619.232.5992 aavigrp@aoi.com ARCHITECTURE^ PLANNING June 19, 2000 Esgil Corporation 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 San Diego, CA 921 23 RE: Plan Check No. 00-623 (SET III) 1 40 Chestnut, Carlsbad, CA Attn: Chuck Mendenhall This letter is intended to describe our response to your plan check corrections requested for the above referenced project: All corrections have been made to the original drawings - 2 copies of the "REVISED" sheets S2, S3 and SD3 have been resubmitted herewith along with revised calculations and comments from John Nicita - Structural Engineer in accordance with your conversations. any questions please call. Wayne D 344 Seventh Avenue San Diego California 92101 14 00-08,47. Patricia D. Nicita 613-463-4364 TRANSMISSION SHEET fade 9757 91977-3447 619 463 771? 619 463 4964 \i- DATE: TO: FKOM: NUMBER OP PAGES SENT, INCLUDING THIS ONE: RE: Jun 14 00 08:48a Patricia D. Nicita 619-463-4964 p.2 I4t> JOHH EHGIHEERIHG & CODE CONSULTING 9757 WYMAH WAY SPRING VALLEY, CA 91977-3447 (619)463-7718, FAX: (619)463-4964 SffiST lof 4L . 4 14 00 08;48a D. Nicita S1S-463-4S64 P.3 Jun 14 00 08:48a Patricia D. Micita 619-463-4964 p.4 5 I t 4 1 8 t»5V i.& * \1\.f |«C»* lt-9 J^l -2231 *i Hit 1112 !•.<•I u,r 4 * i »f '' 04/13>/2000 11:21 6132325992 DAVIS GROUP DAVIS QROUPP PAGE 01 61tl.232.S990 $19.232. 5992 ARCHITECTURE* PLANNING Subject: ESGIL CORPORATION .Attn: Chuck Mendenhall Plan Gtfeck 00-623 140 Chestnut - Carlsbad, CA Pater 04-13-00 FAX No. 858-560-1576 Attached is a letter from H&L Engineering (re: soils report) addressing Plan Check Correction Also, the final truss calcs and layouts have not yet arrived — unknown delays. I will get them to your office as soon as I receive them, t trust that win impair your re-check process. call if you have aptfquestiems. ayne KMs, AIA 343 Fourth Avenua Suite 204 San Diego, CA 92101 04/43/2000 11:21 6192325992 DAVIS GROUPP PAGE 02 64/13/00 08:31 FAX ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 1525 $ Eaccmdido Blvd. Suite A, Escondido, CA 92025 (760)741-0533 FAX (760) 741-5794 April 12, 2000 Bony Blue P.Q Box 99 2231LaMittda She: HOChettnut Avenue, Carlsbad Subject: Liquefaction Potential To Whom It M»y Concern: The soils at the above referenced ittc consists of light tan sands typical of the coastal area. Two 20* deep borings were drilled within the proposed development area The sands were considered firm at several feet below the jurfece. Minimal grading will be required to implement the proposed construction During this grading, any loos* soils will be removed and recompacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction. Beach sands deposit* are generally dense enough to resist liquefaction because the grains have been subjected to horizontal movement by the compactive effect of the waves. The soils on this tite are also confined by the concrete seawall west of Carlsbad Boulevard. This confinement aids in the resistance to liquefaction. Baaed upon the above mentioned conditions and the absence of shallow ground water, liquefaction is not considered to be probable at this site. 6ft4Q2lvAlMmM •2^, ;} JOHN HICITA ENGINEERING & CODE CONSULTING 9757 WYMAN WAY SPRING VALLEY, CA 91977-3447 (619)463-7718, FAX: (619)463-4964 t>A y 0 1 ^ U p SHEET 1 of 2 , C., p 4^ // /o Jti of. (O t^f 3. 7 i4 *f calc''s.a 4, are to. ieA&ra\ (oaJ( ^(rt 31,00 09:2Ga Patricia D. Nicita 619-463-4964 TRANSMISSION SHEET 9757 9W77-3447 619 463 771? 6W 463 DATE: TO: FROM: NUMBER OF PAGES SENT, INCLUDING THIS ONE: 4* RE: -3f-^*^* ottTJ p. 1 Maa 31 00 09:26a Patricia D. Nicita 619-463-4964 p.2 140 t> A<^ p.5p .TOBK HICITA ENGIHEERIKG & CODE CONSULTING 975* WYMAH WAY SPRIHG VALLEY, CA 91977-3447FAX: (619)463-4964 SHEET lof CO. May 31^00 09:2Ga Patricia D. hici ta 619-463-4364 p. 3 -fco -tite M>itl (0 shear m*tf* _»J PtAf* . DfAfe, a^oooa,as, P.iMol. D. NI01M •M.n,.4m, .• " ' . I i * t-f 7 t>y e^ ^^ e^^ t*j JOHN NICITA ENGINEERING & CODE CONSULTING 9757 WYMAN WAY SPRING VALLEY, CA 91977-3447 (619)463-7718, FAX: (619)463-4964 y ((-J SHEET 1 of \ ROOF FRAMING: (See notes S schedules on sheet -Si of plans) TRUSSES: TYP. (U.G.N.): LL < to psf DL < °(,6 +• 1.5 + 3.0 + 2.<* + .0.<l. .= (7 psf rfg shtg friag clg raise RAFTERS: TYP. (U.O.N.): , LL < <Lo psf DL < <\,o + 1.5 + 3.0 + 2. if -»- 0.^ = (7 psf rfg shtg frmg clg raise Tot^-rs: (D/J.^I) LL <• 4O psf < ^.° +"2'° f 5.0 -4- ^?,c. -t- 1.4- x \$> >*,4CX. HEADERS & BEAMS: TYP. (l'.0:N.):. w < 500 plf, R < 250 x L H-l : w < 800 plf, R < 400 x L < 3000 # H-2: w < 1200 plf, R < 600 x L < 3600 f H-3: w < 325 plf, L < 16.5', R < 2681 I M < 11060 ft-f, I = 411 in H-4: w < 400 plf, L < 16.5', R < 3300 f M < 13613 ft-f, I = 505in (4x or 6x ),404in (PAR.) S .= 1-3613(12)/875(-i.25)=149in (4x ),121in (6x ) See calc's. & details by. truss mfgr. See schedule on sheet S I of plans £ up jo See schedule on sheet S; of plans 4x6 to 4.0' . 4x8 to 5.0' 4x10 to 6.5' & 4x12 to 7.5' 4x5 to 3.0'. 4x8 to 4.0' ' 4x10 to. 5.0' &. 4x12 to 6.0' 4x12 SEL. STR.'or 6x10 » 1 or 4x14 f 2 DF-L 6x12 fl-DF-L or 3.5"xll.88" PARALLAM w/ (1) 2x trim. & (1) 2x king stud ea. end • I*. SHEET '2- ROOF FRAMING: (CONT.) HEADERS S BEAMS: (CONT.) H-5 : P= 88 (LL) W = 88 (LL) 5.5 Rl =376.25 MAX 61.25 MIN 188 (DL) 188(DL) | 2.75 R2 =1383.75 M* =393.234 M- =1175.62 Fb =2988 s =4.86466 E =2888888 1 =17.458 w = L = R = 488 14 2888 M Fb E S' =; = 9888 2988 2888888 s = I = 48.5517 246.96 RB-2:. u = L = R = 588 13 3258 M = Fb = E = 18562.5 2988 2888888 s = I = 43.7869 247.163 RB-3 : PI =2888 3.5 Rl =4588 P2 =2888 | V =288 18 3.5 R2 =4588 M =14525 Fb =2988 S =68.1834 E =2888888 I =444.465 PI =2888 1 1 3.5 Rl =5169.32 P2 =6858 | W =288 18 3.5 R2= 7888.88 M =16866.9 Fb =2988 s =69.7941 E =2888888 1 =516.128 H-6: P = 128 (LL) W = 88 (LL) 5 Rl =28 MAX -588 MIN . 188 (DL) 128 (DL) 1 5 R2 =2688 M+ =1 M- =4888 Fb = 1894 s =43.8757 E =1688888 I =98 GIRDER TRUSS : w< 300 PLF, L < 21.5", • R < 3225 I 4x8 ft 2 DF+L 1.75x11.88 PARALLAH 1.75x11.88 PARALLAM 3.5x11.88 PARALLAH w (2)2a STUDS EACH END 3.5x11.88 PARALLAM w/ (2)2x4 STUDS. % EACH END 4x8 I 2 DF-L SEE CALC'S k PET'S BY HFGR: SHEET ROOF FRAMING: (COHT.) HEADERS S BEAh H-7 : . u = 658 L = 8 R = 2688 Ki (CONT.) M • 5288 Fb =1894 S = E = 1688888 1 - 57.8384 93.6 RB-5 : u = 325. L = 17.5 R = 2843.75 M = 12441.4 Fb = 2988 s = E = 2888888 I = 51.4817 391.984 BBdLL P = 14 Rl =2281.88 2844 M = w= 288 Fb = s = 3 E = R2 =4842.12 I = 11226.4 2988 46.4539 2888888 343.526 RB-7 : P = 11 Rl =2889.43 2844 M = w=288 Fb = s = 3 E = R2 =3634.57 I = 18883.7 2988 41.3947 252.894 H-8 : P =3654 M = | u=288 Fb - 5 Rl =1493.23 s = 1.5 E = R2 =3468.77 I = 4966.15 2983 28.5496 OQQQOQCftcxSauOoo 58.184 4x12' t 2 DF-L 3.5x11.88 PARALLAM 3.5x11.88 PARALLAM w/ (2)2x4 STUDS @ R2 3.5x11.88 PARALLAM w/ (2)2x4 STUDS 8 R2 3.5x9.5 PARALLAM w/ (2)2x4 TRIM § R2 SHEET FLOOR FRAMING: (See notes & schedules on sheet SI of plans) JOISTS: TYP. (U.Q.N.) : LL < 40 psf DL = 13.0 + 2.0 + 3.0 + 2.6 + 1.4 = 22 psf topg shtg frmg clg misc P = 766 w = 65 11 6 Rl = 799.559 R2 = 1885.44 M = 4862.65 Fb = 2988 s = 20.1213 E = 2808888 1 = 148.797 F/J-3 : LL < 40 PSF, DL < 22 PSF, L < 21.5' See schedule on sheet SI of plans s <z o P = 1286 w .= 58 5 16 Rl = 1439.29 R2 = 818.714 M = 6571.43 Fb = 2988 s = 27.1921 E = 2888888 1 = 248.4 HEADERS & BEAMS: TYP. (U.O:N.): w < 500 plf, R < 250 x L H-ll: w < 800 plf, R < 400 x L <. 3000 t H-12: w < 1200 plf, R < 600 x L < 3600 t H-13: w L R = 988 = 8 = 3688 M Fb E -7289 = 1358 = 1688883 s = I = 64 129.6 FB-1: P = 14 Rl = 1261.74 4919 | W = 65 3 R2 - 3862.26 M = 11294.3 Fb = 2988 s = 46.735 E = 2888888 "l = 345.685 FB-2: w =158 L =17 R=1275 M =5418.75 • Fb = 2988 E =2888888 S = 22.4224 I = 165.814 & TSX/ffLO $50 <S~ I-Z" »/ See schedule on sheet SI of plans 4x6 to 4.0" . 4x8 to 5.0' 4x10 to 6.5' & 4x12 to 7.5' 4x6 to 3.0'. 4x8 to 4.0' 4x10 to 5.0' & 4x12 to 6.0' 117/fe PAPAL Ui^M SHEET 5 FLOOR FRAMING : (CONT.) HEADERS S BEAMS : (CONT.) FB-3 : PI = 1688 5 Rl = 6918.94 P2 = 9 3862 | u = 688 3 R2 = 8751.86 M = 27854.7 Fb = 2988 5 = 111.951 E = 2888888 I = 827.874 H-13 w = 488 M = L =8 Fb = R = 1688 E = 3288 1358 loUuuuO s = I = 28.4444 57.6 FB-4 : P = 7661 u = 6.5 18.5 Rl = 5581.79 R2 = 188 3779.21 M = Fb = s = E = I = 34169. 2988 2 141.39 2888888 1845.58 FB-5 : P = 5582 u = 8 4.5 Rl = 5134.52 R2 = 588 6697.48 M = Fb = s = E = I = 25876. 2988 2 183.763 2888888 564.214 H-14 : w =988 L =8 M =7288 Fb = R = 3688 E = 1358 1688888 s = I = 64 129.6 H-15 : P= 8(LL) u= 268 (LL) 5 Rl = 558 MAX -758 MIN 188 (DL) 158 (DL) 1 5 R2 = 4388 »+ = 368.982 M- - 5625 Fb = 1894 s = 61.7882 E = 1688888 1 = 126.563 7x11.88 PARALLAM w/ (2) 2x6 STUDS EA. END 4x8 I 2 DF-L 7x11.88 PARALLAH v 5.25x11.88 PARALLAH w/ x12 I 2 DF-L 4x12 I 2 DF-L -oo SHEET FLOOR FRAMING : (CONT.) HEADERS S BEAMS : (CONT.) p =1 3.25 Rl = 2325 1838 w = 188 3.25 R2 = 2325 M = 7828.13 Fb = 2989 s = 29.8819 E = 2888888 1 = 82.2291 FB-7 w =788 L =19 R =6658 M =31587.5 Fb =2988 E =2888888 s = 1 = 138.787 1888.29 F8-8 : P = 13 Rl = 3897.86 2325 L w » 388 4 R2 = 4327.94 M = 14911.8 Fb = 2988 S = 61.7839 E = 2888888 I = 456.3 P= 688 (LL) w= 568 (LL) 6.5 Rl = 2538.77 MAX 218.769 MIN 689 (DL) 349 (DL) | 2.5 R2 = 7269.23 M* = 3558.22 M- = 5812.5 Fb = 1894 s = 63.7569 E = 1688888 I = 117.783 H-17 : FB-9 P = w = Rl = 81 .81 8(LL) B(LL) 188 188 536.696 182.854 7 MAX MIN (DL) (DL) . | 2.75 R2 = 1472.95^(^•ar^-fi M* = M- = Fb = s = E = I = 888.12 1175.62 1894 12.8953 1688888 25.7983 P= 248 (LL) w= 228 (LL) 14 Rl = 2568.57 MAX 834.286 MIN 458 (DL) 188 (DL) 1 «R2 = 5515.71 M+ = 8246.95 M- = 5969 Fb = 2988 s = 24.6621 E = 2888889 I = 193.184 ( -1,1-00 SHEET "7 FLOOR FRAMING : (CONT.) HEADERS & BEAMS : (CONT.) Mi P= 2888 (LL) W= 8(LL) 7 Rl = -636.86 MAX -2236.9 MIN 1527 (OL) 188 (DL) 1 4 R2 = 7663.86 M+ = 2827.94 M- = 18188 Fb = 2988 s = 74.9297 E = 2888888 1 = 358.538 FB-10 : PI = 1668 5 Rl = 8926.06 P2 = 7.5 2862 | w = 988 3.5 R2 = 9935.94 M = 33388.3 Fb = 2988 S = 538.125 E = 2888888 I = 961.353 FB-11 : Ml* • Rl = FB-12 : Rl = FB-13 : Rl = FB-14 : Rl = P = 6911 i w = 4.5 16 5986.45. R2 = P = 6697 | w- 4.5 16 5739.43 R2 = P = 5739 1 w- 3.5 9 12882. 1 R2 = P - 12858 4 _ 9.5 13892.6*^ R2 = M = 26872.8 58 Fb = 2988 s = 187.887 E = 2888888 2829.55 1 = 962.886 M = 25321.2 58 Fb = 2988 . S = 184.777 E = 2888888 1982.57 I = 934.351 M = 36512.3 1488 Fb = 2988 s = 151.885 2-r*C-al*'*M v C - OQQCWlftQt. ~ (LOOOOtJO 19356.9 I = 821.526 M = 47578.4 688 . Fb = 2988 s = 196.843 E = 2888888 7857.41 I = 1155.96 wYt >r tfa* r** — , u — ~ — — _ - ~ «h/ '6LTV tn> ~1 "£• H TO fc f ** *l ^ ^ < ^ ^*. . (Of ^L7^/" -fco FB'fo ~7*HW(> e> r ffyf*(*f- Pkc (4^J *A\A\ • i?u fyr'f • *f» pffke. » (4} &+£ Bfad-'r C- ft- f £*• ^|£$W^ W "7^<#- P&f & ll £>t*\ W SHEET 6 FLOOR FRAMING : (CONT.) HEADERS & BEAMS : (CONT.) FB-14 : (ALT.) p = 4 RJ = 13892.6 12858 | u = 688 9.5 R2 = 7857.41 M = 47578.4 Fb = 24888 s = 23.7852 E = 2.9e7 I = 79.7214 FB-15 FB-16 FB-17 FB-17 : (ALT.) FB-18 FB-18 : (ALT.) P = 5986 I 1488 Rl I 9 13326.7 6.5 R2 14279.3 P = 2.5 Rl = 7829.34 7857 | w = 58 13.5 R2 = 1627.66 M = 17417.1 Fb = 2988 S = 72.8788 E = 2888888 I = 581.613 P = 4.5 Rl = 18898.1 13893 j u = 50 17 R2 = 3277.9 M= 48499.2 Fb= 2980 s = 288.686 E = 2888888 I = 1876.92 p = 12 Rl = 18356 18898 | U = 1488 8 R2 = 28534 M = 119472 Fb = 2988 S = 494.367 E = 2888888 1 = 4388.99 P = 12 Rl = 18356 18898 | w = 1468 8 R2 = 28534 M = 119472 Fb = 24888 S = 59.736 E = 2.9e7 I = 296.62 P = 9 Rl = '13326.7 5986 | w = 1480 6.5 R2 = 14279.3 M = 63248.4 Fb = 2988 s = 261.684 E = 2888888 I = 1764.41 M = Fb = s = E = 1 = 63248.4 24888 31.6282 2.9e7 121.683 W or $74^14- W (V) 3 fa I ft FLOOR FRAMING : (CONT.) SHEET <\ HEADERS S BEAMS : (CONT.) FB-19 : PI = 8653 I 3 Rl = 14864.6 P2 = 6 7665 | u = 988 4 R2 = 13153.4 M = 48543.8 Fb = 2988 S = 167.768 E = 2990909 I = 948.726 FB-19 : (ALT.) FB-20 PI = 8653 ! 3 Rl = 14864.6 P2 = 6 7665 | w = 900 4 R2 = 13153.4 M = 48543.8 Fb = 24000 s = 28.2719 E = 2.9e7 1 = 65.4294 P = 4.5 Rl = 18937.5 13153 | v = 58 17 . R2 = 3298.45 M = 48712.7 Fb = 2988 s = 281.57 E = 2888888 I = 1885.18 FB-20 : (ALT.) P = 4.5 Rl = 18937.5 13153 | u = 50 17 R2 = 3298.45 . M = 48712.7 Fb = 24000 S = 24.3564 E = 2.9e7 1 - 138.813 \AJ [0 or SHEET \O FOUNDATION : (SEE SOIL REPORT : ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE = 2000 PSF) MAXIMUM WALL LOADS : W < 2000 PLF (MAMIMUM)TYP. HIN-. CONT. FT'G AS REQ'D. BY SOIL REPORT 0/K THROUGHOUT CONCENTRATED LOADS R < 24K : A = 24000/2000 = 12.0 SQ. FT., 3.46x3.46 3.-6" SQ. UNREINFORCED R < 12K : A = 12000/2000 = 6.0 SQ. FT1., 1.25x4.8, As~M/fs*j*d 0/K ON TYP. CONT. FT'G. W/ As = 12000*4.8/20000*.9*21 = 0.15 SQ. IN. (l) | 5 .CONT. T. & B. R < 8K : A = 8000/2000 = 4.0 SQ. FT. OTHERS : (SEE RT'G. WALLS ON SHEET 11) 0/K ON TYP. CONT. FT'G. W/ (1) S 5 CONT. T. & B. I - <?> I -oo SHEET I ( CANTILEVERED RETAINING WALLS : I II Ipill'III Wl ']<_.....-H _].1 W2 V • A Fs .. 1A iR: B a• s = SURCHARGE PRESSURE / 120 PCF (EQIV. BACKFILL HT.) SEE SOIL REPORT : Vwall = o*(h-»-s)2/2, Mwall = Vwall*(h+s)/3 As * Mwall/(fs*j*d), np = n*As/(b*d) -> j & 2/kj fb = Mwall*(2/kj)/(b*d!) < Fb = .33*fnf/2 fa = (P+Wl)/Ag < Fa = 0.2fm'/2, fb/Fb+fa/Fa < 1.0 H = o*(h+d+s)'/2, Mot = H*(h+d+s)/3 < Mr/1.5 Mr = (P+Wl)(B-a/2-t/2)+W2(B/2)+(H/3)B > l.SMot SLIDING: Fs = f*R+q*KEY = f(P+Wl+W2+H/3)+q(KEY) > 1.5H BEARING PRESS.: x = IM/R > B/3, q - R/B+M/(B2/6) MAX. 4'-0" RETAINED W/ LEVEL BACKFILL SLOPE I PARKING SURCHARGE: (SEE DETAIL A) fm' 15B8 h 4 PIsee Vuoll 540 fb 198.744 Mr'Mot 2.41209 Fa 409B0 D 1.5 P2 2989 Huall 1089 fs 5847.42 Fs 825.64 n 25.78 so Wl 533.6 As 0.5 fa 16.7131FS--H e. 97854 Fw 38. 7298 t 6.67 W2 749.25 d 5.25 fu 2.48756 KEY 0.48691 Fa 168.75 a 8.25 H 843. 75 np 6.2846 fa'Fa 6.66349 Ml 1003.89 M2. 943.613 Fb 247.5 B 3.33^ R 2864.1 k 8. 46701 fb/-Fb 6.86361 Pl'B 535. 39 R2xB 985.841 Fs 29000 <ifl 2088 Rl 1782.85 j 6.84433 Mot [2169.38 M1*6'B2 545.89 12+6^'B: 516.572 a 38 f 8.4 R2 3282.85 2/kj 5.87211 Mr 5688 il 1881.28 <»2 1496.41 MAX. 6'-0" RETAINED /w LEVEL BACKFILL & NO SURCHARGE : (SEE DETAIL A) fro' 1588 h 6 PI 580 Vuall 540 fb. 198.744 MrxMot 2.77509 F* 40889 D 1.5 P2 2888 Muall 1086 fs 5847.42 Fs 932.36 n 25.78 s 8 Ml 860.4 As 0.5 fa 13.4784 Fs'H 1.10502 Fw 38.7298 I 8.67 W2 749.25 d 5.25 fw 5.59781 KEY 0.3375 Fa 1 68.75 a 3.25 H 843. 75 rw> e.26-)6 fa-'Fa 0.87987 Ml 687.393 H2 1265.11 Fb 247.5 B 3.33* R 2338.9 k 0.46701 fbxFb 6. 86301 R1.'B 615.511 R2'B 1065.96 Fs 20080 •*A 2880 Rl 2049.65 j 0.84433 Mot 2109.38 11*6/B* 371.936 L12*6^'BS 684.526 a 30 f 0.4 R2 3549.65 2'kj 5.07211 Hr 5853.71 il 987.446 t2 1756.49 SHEET LATERAL ANALYSIS: (WIND SPEED = 70 MPH: SEISMIC ZONE 4) BASED ON THE 1997 U B C WIND : P3 PI rr P4 1 P2 1 =1.19 EXPOSURE: C METHOD 1! <«s = 12.6 PI = 11.9952 P2 = 7.497 P3 = 4.4982 P4 = 16.4958 HOftlZ. COHPN 2.37659 P1+P2 =19.4922 FCRF> = 113.528 FCFL> = 194.922 F<FL> = 116.953 Fu = 425.405 LONfitTimiHQI : FCRF> = 149.887 F(FL> = 194.922 F(FL> = 116.953 Fu = 468.962 SEISMIC : 6.25 km FROM TYPE 'B1 SEISMIC SOURCE, SOIL PROFILE SD ASSUMED, Na - 1.15, Ca = .44*Na = .506, P = 2 - 20/(rtaax*fA) = 2 - 20/(.365*H600) = .9996 < 1.0, USE f = 1.0 V = (2.5*Ca/R)W = (2.5*0.506/4.5)W = .281l(W) = f*Eh+Ev = E, E/1.4 = .2008(W) CHECK: D + L + (W or E/1.4) PER SECTION 1612.3.2 LEVa (tfxh)Fx 21 25 525 6.4578 IBf 18 15 278 3.32116 14 78 9.86184 Ftp 53 865 18.64 3»-t»> pup 104* SEE SHEET __ FOR SHEAR TRANSFER THROUGH PARALLEL TRUSSES. DRAG LOAD < 3200 t SEE SHEET FOR TYPICAL SHEAR PANEL OVERTURNING LOADING DIAGRAM SEE NOTES ON SHEET OF PLANS FOR TYPICAL ROOF, FLOOR S WALL SHEATHING, SHEAR TRANSFER, TOP PLATE SPLICES, PLATE ANCHORS, ETC.;EXCEPT AS FOLLOWS:' t "*S .--{-- * i -** ! T^" _ _ _' _ 4* ( vf— -" ' " | j-! « if -Ji y ' > /3.&&F r 1. IJII jj I ^y^~ ^=^ ,5 : ' • *$*. <Ao * ^ij '«* *• II —T~i '* '* »•» 1-- •i.1\' j !---, i [ 1 . il X4- ! IX i-!- - -.< i- » \»_^ SBAJ V& J * VA ^•r ^i /4» '* *J"® ' «« Jl^o> *» —* ns =1^I~-1 ^ — 1 B . «i^2L 1 >• £ *• 1*—$! 0 ^*§ *« ^ ^A-* — = ' a e> _f>i*tPtJ, i-*<r'&<Jr ^>tl'< 3- *fli« ; »» <C|*- wfl *•/ FW//VP - "4 'rt-^ 13.*' «A*T__«-*" ? 14- PL, tt. J 0. o- U *kHt-ol v3n I- ^3 # "- C* fO ^7 i i i^'S M»l * ._ T •iJ.r 4^ [B.y j (j,y ' '41 • 3k fri^d""^* I .. '^# r T*T 7-2.37 FUJPP- <W totet U. *»£ II * v- r- (1440 * 140 V e>- 4- JOHN HICITA ENGIHEBRIHG & CODE CONSULTING 9757 WYMAN WAY SPRING VALLEY, CA 91977-3447 (619)463-7718, FAX: (619)463-4964 SHEET 1 of . 4 ^4-.- £±IxiC£l -> o \S»It * r—» *-U J-* Mcv n\p it *(tt-2. IJ|2 '170 J- 1 .4.9 I 16,* t f * * .7^5 Kfi U| I | I | ** f* I'-S" y |8,f ^ (3,7 ^ 8 4- '?'^" ' tt w-*' / . -t i 53.5 /l/II 7^7 . - # \/- W'MO V . T i* Zextp- TWO 140 /We. y o JOHN HICITA ENGINEERING £ CODE CONSULTING 975,7-ffYMAN WAY .SPRING VALLEY, CA 91977-3447 FAX: (619)463-4964 SHEET 1 of ,! 4- -|iftU -floor C4-) per 7 -fc ov\ -Hu cLt UC>6. r* *" " <J,o -I •f jo shear m* c s2JfeG>1* 34-. I-f uJ co/ JOHN NICITA ENGINEERING & CODE CONSULTING 9757 WYMAN WAY SPRING VALLEY, CA 91977-3447 (619)463-7718, FAX: (619)463-4964 H-1S ATPET; Ar PET uati, 4 Floor I eM-> J 142-1 or 4 1+ 4 .'(<?eJd. Ji NAr4, 10. 4*17 J * KCAf2 i fevered • A «- h ^r - ,7 R. A$, - 4- <2. ;< (4- ILJtt. o- w 3 - 5cvo it £ nio -fr •2i9| * IB.*" tut * t f * A A »7^d l^r-r «•*• ',<,of£ -70H* 3Z&Pi T- £. . S-J.5 7^37 •f-2. "2/4 31.40"4.t /° T v*7£7o * W PLY *>j (o't-et 4 ft4 JOHN NICITA Or-Is bad ENGINEERING & CODE CONSULTING 9757 WYMAN WAY SPRING VALLEY, CA 91977-3447 (619)463-7718, FAX: (619)463-4964 SHEET 1 of 2- C&r\<7>b*,d / ) trev'^A,4 -f / <2.<e. a-7, is 14:are <3t+r'G. 4 ^A/^ jS?V, tt<ZE? (4&T*4-A~&& &*'$& y/T%?D£L •£** *** TO TYf. STONE TRUSS COMPANY STONE TRUSS CO. CERTIFIED INSPECTION ICBO EVALUATION SERVICE INC. AA-583 IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH UBC 2321.3 PREFABRICATED WARNING * WARNING * WARNING BE SURE ERECTION CONTRACTOR UNDERSTANDS HIB-91. SUMMARY SHEET ENCLOSED 507 JONES ROAD • OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92054 • (760) 967-6171 • FAX (760) 967-6178 E-mail: stc inc@ix.netcom.com ST001 CONV FRAMING rou>roi~ n XO-NOOjs. = =>ou~n—lour •o< Tiro TI 33 n i A 22' 21'6"8J >ro 7'6 A5 A6 CONV FRAMING o en CD c_to oA 03 (Jl o DESIGNED BY: STONE TRUSS CO. JOB DESCRIPTION: CHESTNUT CONDO'S JOB LOCATION: 140 CHESTNUT AVENUE "rinixiioSrirmaar'z;3gRKRS5ig|c°°5°<^g^aS'^S^gS "Si— ni ~_»- FV-* =>£ B:<3o5*o<:'~sSi=i5s"l>2S3iES£pS22o£S SiS-.iBg-'V^M- nriM«zM*i? _ C?z..o{13 TO TJ TJ TJM' M M CO K3 CO S3 T3 03 ro 01 coCO o o ooSS? 3 /CD>aozazOM>OMOXOC»COH- - - TDK a O O fflCHo p ioeos^So";<Jo^'loi^IIllllllSex.-'S' ^»^I*aC >^XoOassess P>,s\CB 3\ CO s\ CO ta / II I w CD *—' ^'»Z o 0> O Ioz a: oso o » lion ||G3 !-§g§] _ o >]G U -3£2z5 ' M l J• S x;33 i jO p) O"O I >W4 ("I "T1^"? iGjKdi -3MCO°^^•qraa53r t-1 > > 03 /I 03 / *3n| >° §^>§ \ / / \ / / \ td•z, >*, j?sM V =Dt- \ / ,_— - / / \ / • •^t- \ Iy r, , ^/, w3M N , X1 CALIFOl*-^ , <1 K/« — •^ — — / —«- s•u a ^M CO 'TRUSSECOMMO•^v 11*1 c J * -co .0 o •to • 03 O > to- CO onooooooooOff^\OQDQ0000OOOODOO•-uiori — >>-nozmoo3*.»->ms-IJ!!S»i£ =gl2>S™S=MJiSIsilMSI!:S!*5 > i 5C-9-S3"" =fio3j«^»^iuo=>_0°--iggc — •*f»an>^ ~ ^ ^» « Q frt r * 5 ; 5 ut/» -• = a >. - - -S2=SS>SS H = v> 9 " 5 ffl _ SI " a 2 2 5 3n -3 o5 8- a •=-SIJ : 3 I-3 ilin S3 ? 2^'i| = = = ; "* •" 3 > ' '3 z::s > !•» i r ? I ft o •- • 9-||-g«s^ 5.1 2 g a s i tn a — — " » - n '3 "• ~ ? 3^r ± _ x -i!5| I i i s 11 s i5M'8!i=nra-nfc--. — na>-co;-->3CI 3 9 0 = — >• uJ 5 S a 3 ° m z wi r s =.m 2 > SCl = 3 m o 00 ro 00 00 rovD toMmCT03Om 2 oc m5 >o oz >-n °> -0 <mro>ruai ~J nj -• —Ul VJ1 O Ul O O TI —Imu en"t~o T>m /A Jj. 1-^ru nj01 ru v- i-»ui m 01 ui o o ^* I jJui o m COr~oTIm ru CDc oo ru nm c_onco-H >—t rn m rn —(oZ3333 I-H C/5ro -icncnoz >_r r > zoooan ot-fOTJ~ 3 >cnmm >-" 33-ic/iai -H amv A 33 c_ t—* >O om 266usnvo oa oo o n D o o o o D o o•-•t/ion-»>^>''ioOf~^iHtflcn»-r~«*S o m w z c ?•SSSS-S-S::'-*Sa=8-§aw»^u^xnica3woi~ np»n-> — iS3"* tfl 'O O f~"• >OOC/I-«DO^r'5?2jes,s2 o m -. —a s ft z S3o"=mSc-ntr^ < h* v» o a ui oa g " I s 2 s S 5 s ? - -- -ffi tfl _ • |->O—O=-Ss2?:=: o - < 5 ° S O3D—I Z ~H -tC 01 ^ IS ! g = S ? 5 <S i 1 5 I S * S S ' a w oi o r r -» ^."nZQS^^^Sj — m*~ •**.-» nt—i/i?llii=i!offi 5 — n -< 3 I3. iioS3£ <S 3g S-" s >~ n = 3 S x. r- n o •" CD 5 H S ' '^l1 = _cn LI > H > 3 > na P S •• " 5 ••"i ^ i S 5 - = „ ? " - I S nn * = g I 5 ~ 'I I 3 3a=fs=|s^il nro Xc> NJ XCfv M X CO M X Q -03 sg ox o I o ocn \V ocS3 O COen tnx >r~ TDO33 cn s CDm mHScomoChI CDm • 13 a o !rn m o33 CO Z. en M <• o o m~z.-z.~z.en m H33 •-"m - O33 Zm -a >o i- r-H >1-1 -I Tlz m 33 I-H m o cn mm >33 33 SoG> >> C §2 i m <o ( 33 Om H 33 xz m 33 33rnH en 8. m co2 mH m > en1-103 CD r-33 "-1 O > o ii~ < : H-l •-n o33 m 2 CD 5^ Xm coCO •o XA O. 8 COX 9°CO •S. nu co co M^ §II ~46 .£>.II CO CO NJ co 5=CD Mp g6 uto nOJ £ co cn 9°to IICO nu u6 cTa T>i § £2 £ M•-wonf S | §5S*|-I X U£ 2 J: wa in -u TJvi a r~ uII S gr >-• CD > zgsaS > T, §"0 3J W)d TJ O™ £ sg Ol MoS -no yf£3 *IssS 3 3 EH 1]5 ?S*a > ^ n S z Si 3 r S ? S - o Sc I ~n PI i•o m S -o •T3 5 rn 2 CT CT ri z w X -4 Cl -H '>•!! = : c/i o CT m m a 1^1 >-. n a o '• z Z \1 m -D -* S Bc/i i» >-. — ^ CTo y -••. "- 'E I - a •oo33—i> 3g3 (/) Cl *(^w z ^f - o w3^z M 5 £3 _H |- r-« = srs o m o f" z S m Sn n rnm ^ S S— o ^S S S =3 2 Sl"_gg z w S 5 ^ S 5 '-§'§§• a !X TJ Ml O T3 -4 ' • t/i *-, ffl OS 5 II —i-i --'OO £m > -• c:o m -n ov ~§z H am• X 33 W 33 *x5TJ V>mo p R) O XI CDm> 2 O Zo X•D nPd 2> GS 2 x I-H T3 W Q 3X 0) 0 ^ G W O T3 W 13a s oM » CD T) >-31 W O JO OI > O T) C"* i^ PJ ?d O "^^^ ^H 669 '290 '£ I— (SI CJ •— c/1 3 i -< > o = —| CD CDo r~) o -H —1o r~> Q? r— OJ O en O O O ~~U ~O ~O CO CO CO o o CO OO~n TH 70 ~OCO COm c:—I -oCO ~DO> 70CTio •—< no no noo•^CD o•z.oo o o o< 0)-5 TD "O O oo CD m ?3 X > -Hc~> m 1-1 O CO oo ^ C/lo > oo m !~ O O~o m—i c/> o ~noO 70•i—i no—I -ic ^ o ~n oPD _ o _i f—' CT5 = Onp -~o co o ~n cr s; CD -H -z.u~> m o o 5>rn CD —i ~o •—«oo i~rn c~> o *—*o ^ re ^ (= O O £7>> ^O ^r~ o o co ^O ^D ^O ^o o o i— © © © • ho O \-^ - = CO co -a 1-1 >- ^ (-50 O ^-. o Z ECD CO O O O X OJ 000- CTl O co - 3» O •— > o oo 0) c-f co co co i—i ror~ xco -C*© O) Q. ocP"SJKDC 2. —I CD CD O O O o en no o o o o o GO C/) CO C/) CO POm oLTI oro o72CD o (->s: rr IEmooCD ^D ^DCO O Oro ro (NOXXX-pi -Ca. -Ca.=E O OCO |— |—OOoOJ^ i. O O O <0) CD ~noo © 73 oi. r' > ^ o -^ > o - JO- =o^m>~' -TI o ¥ —I CD O3 —I —I O O O O O o o o o "D "D -OCO CO t/1 CO GO o2OO CO o< CO oL © o~n o oo o no o —I co CD <O C~~i C~~) O en o o 4^ O O O ~0 -OCO GO GO o o—I TJO O•SL 3: 31mooCD xD POOO O Oro no roXXX-fc> -Ci -ti osooCOCOoA GOc•a T3o OO H —I CO CD —I —I O <-) O <-> C-> 0000 ~D ~D "D T3 "O00 00 00 00 OO co e/i >-H i—i r\3 ro nof o:soo -a-ao J o rn 73—i -o o -H ^ O CO o a~o rn t-H CO © O ~n •—i O —I CO r~ CD = O -< >co o ~n ^ r~)co (~i i— a CD>~ 3 CO - :> o *-H > O cn o>- O CO -t- a -Hrn O ~s&•—. >• >- i— o^3> © s: ro —I sm o o > o o en7D 70 O O CO »-H —^ 3> t-« O O O^ E E E CD ro © © © • O O O XCOo o o • O 3-a ax n> tn (D -5 fDa. ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 1525 S. Escondido Blvd. Suite A, Escondido, CA 92025 (760)741-0533 FAX (760) 741-5794 May 1,2001 City of Carlsbad 1 635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Job No. 4572 Subject: Compaction Testing To Whom It May Concern: Rough grading has been completed for the proposed condominium at the above referenced location. Native material was excavated to parking lot grade and exported. At parking lot grade 3 feet of the native soils were removed and recompacted to a minimum 95% relative compaction. This material was placed in approximately 4" lifts and compacted with a smooth steelwheel vibrator, A representative from this firm was present to perform visual inspections as grading progressed and to perform relative compaction testing at representative locations to ensure that adequate compaction was obtained. A summary of our tests results and test location plat is attached hereto and made part of this Report. Density testing was performed in accordance with ASTM 2922 (Nuclear) and D1556 procedures. Additional compaction testing will be needed for the parking lot ramp and retaining wall backfill. Sincen 92K5ooCO CO CO 0o CO -»• ro CO ro~slo COcn cn 00ro8-j CO CDCD CO IO 0 o ro CO ro0 00 ro— •] o CDcn -*• g8O) COCDCD 1 1 Oo z* CO ^ro ro o COcn •* 00fooocn CDCD w1 oo ro O) ro ro ro -si o COo>ro 92ro0o-toCD CD 1 3T , O ^ro ro ro -si o COcn O) -siro8CO COCDCD CO cT 1 , cn O 00 B ro•^j o COO) •* ~s|roooro COCDCD CO , cn o CO ro O) ro-«4 O COcn 00 Soo^COCD Q> CO I i cn ^CO ro ro M o cocn -p>. 0C/3 Hpi Cr> H P i •n O t*5 HOg ^ Ass 2 /— s *-§""s? c2 ss o ^ 03S G 3 2 Xo j2 r. ^ 5 * •< fj -§ P'j^ ^o ri I88 iii I vo bo to 'DRS DWG. GS-17 7 1/2" THICK APRON ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 1525 S. Escondido Blvd. Suite A, Escondido, CA 92025 (760)741-0533 FAX (760) 741-5794 lob No.~ *^ February 12, 1999 Re: 3392 Carlsbad Blvd, Carlsbad Subject: Preliminary Soils Investigation TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Per the request of the project owner, our firm has conducted a Investigation of the soil conditions found at the above referenced represents the findings and recommendations for the proposed develo the results of this investigation. Preliminary Soils site. This report )ment based upon ttfl ' This investigation consisted of a site reconnaissance and the drilling of several borings to a depth of approx. 20' feet. Laboratory testing was performed on representative soils samples obtained from these borings in order to evaluate pertinent physical properties of the soils encountered. The conclusions and recommendations that follow are based upon review of the proposed development, inspection of the site, analysis of the data obtained and,our experience with similar soil conditions. ¥ f •«•>•»}»,< t - $•!>'.*, ~ - -m*1 'n^f\ i,,! H"^>*;\^t«v%( ,j:'* ••^fj^'i- PROJECT SCOPE Explore the subsurface conditions to the depths influenced by the proposed construction Evaluate, by laboratory test, the pertinent engineering properties of the various strata which will influence the development, including their bearing capacities, expansive characteristics and settlement potential. Develop soil engineering criteria for the site grading and provide design information regarding the stability of cut/fill slopes. Determine potential construction difficulties and provide recommendations concerning these problems. Recommend an appropriate foundation system for the type of structures anticipated and develop soil engineering design criterialfbfsthe^recbrnmended design. (H-, A • f#f* * -2N#;. &Ft&&ftLr*l S THE SITE The site consists" of a nearly level rectangular shaped residential lot located at'3392 Carlsbad Blvd. in the City of Carlsbad. The site is located at the Northeast corner of the intersection of Chestnut Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard. An older single story residence currently exists on this site. The majority of the rear yard is covered" with concrete patio slabs, and the detached garage has been converted to a rental unit. A large level lawn area makes up the front (west) yard area. ; A Grading Plan for the future two story multi-unit residential structure and underground parking area is being prepared by HL Engineering and Surveying (RCE 33220) and is currently being processed with the .City of Carlsbad Engineering Department. Maximum cut depths are anticipated to be in the range of 10'-12'. rz 1»<&«5U<i«<1!'Wl**>-* •«. u-t ^MiW^SS£m^ikfe4feMM!S$; FIELD INVESTIGATION *In February, 1999, our firm made a field reconnaissance of the site. Two drilled borings were made on the site within the proposed development area. Access to the rear yard was prohibited due to concrete flatwork and patio covers. In both holes, the upper 12' foot layer of soil consists of brown fine coastal sands. This was underlain by a light tan sand to a maximum depth of 20' where drilling was terminated. Representative soils samples were taken from the site and laboratory testing was performed on these soils samples in order to evaluate pertinent physical characteristics so that we might make appropriate development recommendations contained later in this report. These sands are considered to be easily rippable by modern dozers. Ground water was not encountered during our investigation and ground water is not expected to be a problem during the site development construction. The predominant soils anticipated to be encountered during residential lot grading are considered to be non-expansive and no special design considerations will be necessary to compensate for expansive characteristics. LABORATORY TESTS Laboratory tests were performed in accordance with generally accepted test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and other suggested procedures. The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the near surface soils were determined in accordance with ASTM test D1557, Method A. In addition, a direct shear test was performed on samples remolded to 90% of maximum dry density at optimum moisture content. Field moisture content and dry density were determined from representative undisturbed samples. This information was an aid to classification and permitted recognition of variations in material consistent with depth. The dry unit weight is determined in pounds per cubic foot, and the field moisture content is determined as a percentage of the soils dry weight. Field classifications were verified in the laboratory by visual examination. The final soils classifications are in accordance with the Unified Soil Classifications System. Direct shear tests were performed to evaluate bearing potential along with maximum density testing and visual expansive analysis. Maximum dry density of {he sand found on " • • . ' ithe site was determined to average 126.8 pcf at 10% optimum moisture content. No expansive analysis of these soils was performed. By visual observation to similar soil samples from which UBC-29-2 testing procedures were pe formed, I have made the conclusion that this material is non-expansive. No special desigr considerations will be necessary to compensate for expansive soil characteristics if constru ^ion occurs on these soil types. / ; 5 and comparing v*^^« ^ii«w«^a*¥^Mfe^*^*5Si»*^**sca?yi TECTONIC SETTING Along with most of the Southwestern portion of California, Carlsbad, San Diego County, and parts of Mexico are located on a relatively stable tectonic plate. This plate is bounded on the East by the San Andreas Fault System and on the West by the San Clemente Fault System. These faults contain many other parallel faults which are essentially high angle strikeship faults with a Northwest/Southeast trend. Although the bounding fault systems are active, the interior of the tectonic plate is not generally disturbed by the fault movement. Geological references indicate that not much damage will occur from earthquakes of magnitude of less than 6 for sites eight miles or more from the fault. Since maximum probable earthquakes for the general San Diego Area is in the known active faults we can infer that the shaking problem will not be too great. Current seismic design criteria as imposed by the U.B.C. should be satisfactory to compensate for seismic action. There are no existing landslides, faults or other natural disturbances noted on the site or in the immediate area as determined from air photos, and field inspection. This does not preclude the possibility of sliding by poor; grading or other man made practices. This site can be considered relatively free of geologic hazards. «^ CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based on the results review, field reconnaissance and investigations, test holes, laboratory data analysis, our experience in the general vicinity of the site, and our professi )f our document and engineering nal judgments. The site may be utilized for the proposed development provided the recommendations of this report are carefully followed. The undisturbed native soils, properly compacted native soils or combinations thereof, should adequately support the proposed structures without detrimental settlement. The recommendation presented in this report are contingent on review of final plans and specifications. It is recommended that HL Engineering & Surveying, be retained to provide continuous soil engineering services during the earthwork operations. This is to observe compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations and to allow design changes in the event subsurface conditions differ from those anticipated prior to start of construction. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS No$major hazards, such as faults or landslides, were identified to be present on, or in the immediate vicinity of the site. GENERAL SITE PREPARATION Removal of loose, unsuitable soil will be required before placement of engineered fill in all proposed fill areas. We recommend that all organic matter, oversize rock, and other i. r . . '•'."..-•' ' deleterious materials be removed from the site. All loose or porous surface soils, and any . ->< r j^i. PS* } - *taaiaaamea^^i fill soils not removed by the grading operation, shall be excavated ind scarified as required, watered, and compacted prior to placing any additional fill. All existing trees that need to be removed to grade the site (including root systems) shall be removed from the site. The existing structures are scheduled to be demolished to accommodate the new proposed residential units. All concrete foundations, utility conduit and debris shall be removed from the site. Surface and subsurface water is not expected to be a problem during the grading of the site. The anticipated depths of surface soils removal in the proposed development area are -i - • anticipated to be approximately 2-4 feet in depth. After overexcavation, the exposed surface shall be scarified to a depth of 12 inches, watered as required, and properly compacted prior to placing fill. In-situ scarification can generally treat the upper 12 inches of soil; otherwise, overexcavation will be necessary. The actual depth of the excavation and recompaction should be determined in the field by the soil engineer or his representative during grading, when the soils are exposed. All embankment shall be compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction and all existing ground within 7.0 feet laterally and to a depth of 1.0 foot below the bottom of foundations shall be compacted to a least 90% relative compaction. Any abandoned underground utilities should be removed or crushed in-place to avoid the possibility of localized settlement due to collapse of a loaded utility pipe. Adjacent pipes extending into the project site should be plugged to minimize the possibility of foundation into a pipe. Excavations resulting from utility removal should be ' properly backfilled and fill compacted in accordance with the attached specifications. Any abandoned septic tanks or cesspools should be removed and backfilled with compacted fill or cleaned and filled with lean concrete. Results of our field explorations indicate that all material within the p depths can be excavated with light to medium ripping effort with he; equipment. The efficiency of excavation is dependent upon condition c capability of the operator. Replacement soils should be recompacted to a minimum relative compact (based on ASTMD1557-78) roposed grading vy-duty grading f equipment and on of 90 percent DRAINAGE .ff"vb;I;*, -%. J h.' We recommend that measures be taken to properly finish grade the site after structures and other improvements are completed so that positive drainage away from all floor slabs and foundations exist. Even when proper drainage measures have been taken, experience has shown that a shallow groundwater or surface water condition may develop in areas where no such water condition existed prior to site development. This is particularly true when substantial increase in surface water infiltration results from landscape irrigation. We recommend that surface drainage be designed to have a minimum two percent slope away from buildings and that all drainage water are collected and directed to discharge structures via properly designed surface swales, ditches or subsurface conduits. Installation of roof gutters and downspouts are recommended on any planned building, with all discharge being properly routed away from foundations and slabs, preferably into underground conduits. All retaining walls shall be properly waterproofed and have an approved drainage system installed; FOUNDATIONS • ' Two requirements must be fulfilled by any foundation soil material. First, against shear failure of the foundation soils which would result in lateral under the load. Second, foundation settlement or heave should be within for the structure. It is our opinion that the type of structures propose development can be supported on conventional, isolated or continuous fix! it should be safe rhovement of soil acceptable limits i for future site tings. The foundation design criteria provided herein are based on guidelines provided by the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) and the Los Angeles District Portland Cement Association (PCA). Specifically, these guidelines are intended to lessen the adverse affects of expansive and/or compressible soils. They do not stop differential movement since structures may move in response to variation in soil moisture. These movements can and do cause some cracking of exterior stucco, concrete foundations and slab-on-grade floors. The design guidelines developed by the FHA and PCA were intended to provide foundation systems that limit cracking and other strain features to generally acceptable levels. Attempts to reduce strain features below these generally acceptable levels require engineering and construction costs typically considered inappropriate for residential construction. It should be noted that implementation of the foundation recommendations contained herein can be expected to result in some minor cracking of slabs, footings and walls, which should be considered the normal result of a necessary balance between benefits and costs. Minor cracking does not affect the serviceability of structure and is generally considered acceptable. PRELIMINARY FOOTING DESIGN We recommend that footing for light to medium-weight structures be founded in properly compacted non-expansive fill soils or formational materials. The foundation system shall be designed by the project architect or structural engineer. ' • ' • ' ' ' .'.'••" 10 ''•-• :•" •. "V r Minimum foundation shall be 12 inches wide and founded 15 inches below grade for a single story structure, and 15" wide x 18" deep for a two story, and shall have four #4 bars of reinforcing steel. Two bars shall be placed 3 inches below the top of foundation, and the other two bars shall be placed 3 inches from the bottom of foundation. These recommendations are based upon soil characteristics only and do not reflec t any possible design considerations imposed by building design which might ii crease these recommendations. The proposed foundations may be designed utilizing bearing pressure of 2100 L.B./S.F. This value may be increased by 1/3 foi an allowable the design of loads that include wind and seismic analysis. Slab on grade shall be reinforced with #3 bar reinforcement placed on 18 inch centers both directions. This reinforcing shall be placed midway in the slab. All foundations shall maintain 7 feet of lateral support to any fill slope •I face, measured from the bottom of the foundation. All retaining walls shall be properly waterproofed and have an approved drainage system installed. LATERAL RESISTANCE To provide resistance for design lateral loads of footings and shear keys poured neat against vertical excavations, we recommend using a passive pressure of 450 pounds per cubic foot for properly compacted granular fill. This value assumes a horizontal surface for the footing or three time the height of the surface generating the passive pressure, whichever is greater. The upper 12 inches of soil in areas not protected by floor slabs or pavements should not be included in design for passive resistance to lateral loads. If friction is to be used to resist lateral loads, we recommend a coefficient of friction of > 0/46 between soil and concrete. >I* 1 11 ACTIVE WALL PRESSURES «i We recommend that any proposed retaining walls that are unrestrained at t to deflect, be designed for an active equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pounds This assumes the soil behind the retaining wall will consist of compacted, granular soils. This also assumes level backfill conditions and that no s exist. For walls with a sloping backfill of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical), we active equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf. For walls that are restrained at th a horizontal backfill surface, we recommend an active pressure of 55 pcf. e top and free >er cubic foot, ion-expansive, rcharge loads 'ecommend an ; top and have We recommend that a positive drainage system be incorporated into the design of retaining walls or, alternately, that walls be designed for hydrostatic pressure. Additional or final recommendations will be made and contained in the final "As Graded Report" when a more complete evaluation of foundation soils can be made. APPURTENANT STRUCTURES Construction of any proposed appurtenant structures such as pools, spas, walls, gazebos, decks, etc., should be reviewed by the Engineer in order to verify surface and subsurface conditions and provide necessary recommendations. WARRANTY AND LIMITATIONS The .recommendations and opinions expressed in this report reflect our best estimate of the '-/project requirements based on an evaluations of the subsurface exploration locations and ^ _, 'the"assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate appreciably from the those - '^ f-;; %J- 4 *rf 12 encountered. It should be recognized that the performance of the foundations may be influenced by undisclosed or unforeseen variations in the soil conditions that may occur in the intermediate and unexplored areas. Any unusual conditions not covered in this Jreport that may be encountered during site development should be brought to the attention of the Soils Engineer so that he may make modifications if necessary. It is the responsibility of the DeveloperJ or their representative to ensure that the informatign and recommendations contained herein are brought to the i rtention of the Engineer and Architect for the project and incorporated into the project plans and specifications. It is further their responsibility to take the necessary mea ;ures to insure that the contractor and his .sub-contractors carry out such recommenaations during construction. All grading shall be monitored by a qualified Civil Engineer to insure compliance with these recommendations and applicable City of Carlsbad Ordinances. Recommended grading specifications are included in this report as attached Exhibit "A". Resp cLantis R.C.E. 33220 Attachments: Grading Specification Boring Logs Test pit location plat Appendix E 13 RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS HL ENGINEERING & SURVEYING hereinafter described as the Soil Engineer, should be consulted prior to any site work connected with site development to ensure compliance with these specifications. These specifications shall only be used in conjunction with the *isoil report to which they are attached and made a part thereof. 1.0 General This firm shall consist of all clearing and grubbing, preparation of laid to be filled, filling of the land, spreading, compacting, control of the fill, and all work necessary to complete the grading of the filled area to conforr i with the lines, grades, and slopes as shown on the accepted plans. subsidiary 1.1 The Soil Engineer shall test and observe all grading operations. In the event that any unusual conditions not covered by the Soil Engineer's recommendations or special provisions are encountered during the grading operations, the Soil Engineer shall be contacted for further information. 2.0 Tests The standard test used to define maximum density of all compaction work shall be the ASTM Test Procedure Dl557-70. All densities shall be expressed as a relative compaction in terms of the maximum dry density obtained in the laboratory by the foregoing procedure. 3.0 Clearing, Grubbing, and Preparing Areas to be Filled Any trees not utilized in landscaping, structures, weeds, and other rubbish shall be removed, piled, or otherwise disposed of so as to leave the areas that have been disturbed with a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. v_ 3.1 Any septic tanks, if encountered, and debris must be removed from the site prior to any building, grading, or 1511 operations. Septic tanks, including all connecting drain fields, and other lines, must be totally removed and the resulting depressions properly reconstructed and filled to the complete satisfaction of the supervising Soil Engineer. 3.2 All water wells on the site shall be capped, according to the requii ements of the San Diego County Health Department, at least two feet below the final elevations of the adjacent grade prior to any grading of fill operations. The s cap shall be at least equal to the adjacent soil. 3.3 All buried tanks, if encountered, must be totally removed and the rength of the esulting depressions properly reconstructed and filled to the complete satisfaction of the supervising Soil Engineer. 3.4 All deleterious matter and soil designated as unsuitable by the Soil Engineer shall be removed under supervision and direction of the Soil Engineer. The exposed surface shall then be plowed or scarified to a depth of at least eight inches and until the surface is free from ruts, hummocks, or other uneven features which would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. 3.5 The original ground upon which the fill is to be placed shall be plowed or scarified deeply, and where the slope ratio of the original ground is steeper than 6.0 horizontal to 1.0 vertical, the land shall be stepped or benched. At the toes of the major fills and on the sideslope fills, the base key shall be, as described elsewhere in this report, at least ten feet in width, cut at least three feet into the undisturbed or native soil, and sloped back into the hillside at a gradient of not less than two percent. Subsequent keys should be cut into the hillside as the fill is brought up the slope. The constructionj of subsequentkeying operations shall be determined '9mm' by the Soil Engineer during grading operations. Ground slopes which are flatter than 6 to 1 shall be benched when considered necessary by the Soil Engineer.' ' 3.6 4.0 4.1 After the foundation for the fill has been cleared, plowed, or scarified, it shall be disced or bladed until it is uniform and free from large clods, brought to the proper moisture content by adding water or aerating, and recompacted to a relative compaction of not less than 90 percent. Materials Native soil, free of organic material and undesirable deleterious used as fill. Native soil which is expansive shall not be placed wilthin feet of the building pads'without the prior approval of the Soil E: rpaterial, may be thin the top three igineer. The materials for fill shall be approved by the Soil Engineer before commencement of grading operations. Any imported material must be approved for use before being brought to the site. The materials used shall be free from vegetable matte and other deleterious material, and be non-expansive. Expansive soil is defined as soil which expands more than three percent when saturated at 90 percent relative compaction and optimum moisture content under a surcharge of 150 p.s.f. 5.0 Placing, Spreading, and Compacting Fill Material The selected fill material shall be placed in layers which, when compacted, shall allow adequate bonding and compaction. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly blade mixed during the spreading to ensure uniformity of material in each layer. 5.1 When the moisture content of the fill material is below that specified by the Soil Engineer, water shall be added until the moisture content is as specified to assure thorough bonding during the compaction process. When the moisture content of the fill material is above that specified by the Soil Engineer, the fill material shall be I?- aerated by bladihg or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is as specified. • ; • • • ' • * ' 5.2 After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to a relative compaction of not less that 90 percent. 5.3 When fill material includes rock, no rock will be allowed to nest, and all voids must be carefully filled with small stones or earth, and properly compacted. No rocks larger that twelve inches in greatest dimension will be peYrqitted in the pad fill. All rock placement shall conform continuously supervised. 5.4 Compaction shall be by sheepsfoot rollers, multiple wheel pneum or other types of acceptable compacting equipment. 5.5 Field density tests shall be made by the Soil Engineer. Where sh< itic-tired rollers, epsfoot rollers are used and the soil may be disturbed to a depth of several inches, density tests shall be taken in compacted material below the disturbed surface. When these tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill or portion thereof is below the required 90 percent relative compaction, the particular layer or portion shall be reworked until the required density has been obtained. 5.6 The fill operation shall be continued in compacted layers, as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes and graded as shown on the accepted plans. 5.7 Fill slopes shall be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compaction operations shall be continued until the slopes are stable. 5.8 All earthmoving and working operations shall be controlled to prevent water from running into excavated areas. All water shall be promptly removed and the site kept dry. J 6.0 Disposal of Oversize Rock Oversize rock shall be either exported from the site, used for landscaping purposes, or placed in conformance'with the Soil Engineer's recommendations. 7.0 Engineering Observation Field observations by the Soil Engineer shall be made during the fil compaction operations so that that Soil Engineer can express his. o f the conformance of the grading with the accepted specifications. 8.0 Seasonal Limits No fill material shall be placed, spread, or rolled while it is at an un and inion regarding uitable high moisture content, nor during unfavorable weather conditions. When the work is interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations shall not be resumed until field tests by the Soil Engineer indicate that the moisture,content and density of fill area is as previously specified. ENGINEERING ^SURVEYING Project Name:_ 1525 S. Escondido Blvd.. Suite A. Escorvdido. CA 92025 (619) 741-0533 FAX (619) 741-5794 BLUB Date: J39JL CARLSBAD &LW... CMLSBAO SOIL BORING LOG DESCRIPTION Soil Type , 0 - 'A' •MOWN FINE. COftSTfi TAN- SAND Project Name : ENGINEERING ^SURVEYING 1525 S. Escondido BW.. Suite A. Escondkio. CA 92025 (619) 741-0533 FAX (619) 741-5794 BLUE Date: CWLS&fiD &LVO.. SOIL BORING LOG Depth I ,±aI tFeet DESCRIPTION Soil Type <0 - 'A'TOP SOIL 7"/IA/ 5/l/VO &Mi4^av'..i- ..- ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 1525 S. Escondido Blvd.. Suite A, Escondido. CA 92025 (619) 741-0533 FAX (619) 741-5794 Project Name:BLUB Date .3391 CARLSMO '.. .CAMS&ACi SOIL BORING LOG Depth '£»Ee'et DESCRIPTION Soil Type •# I 0 -r 'A'TOP SOIL MOWN FINE COASTAL 5AND. tf- W" LIGHT T.AM -SAflD Project Name: ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 1525 S. Escondido Blvd., Suite A, Escondido. CA 92025 (619) 741-0533 FAX (619) 741-5794 &LUE Date: 2-3-9? 22 <U &LVO., SOIL BORING LOG fepth DESCRIPTION Soil Type ~ 'A'TOPSoiL '„*• ,<• LIGHT-TAN 5/1A/D APPENDIX E ORIGIN OF STRAIN FEATURES AND CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES I. ORIGIN OF STRAIN FEATURES Strain features, for example cracks in walls-and slabs, are a result of deformation of the house and ^improvements under the action offerees. Some of these forces may originate in the underlying soil; however, other forces originate as a result of construction methods and materials. These origins of forces often interact as contributing factors. The goal of construction practice and engineering is to limit development of strain features to generally accepted levels: An attempt to reduce strain features below generally accepted levels requires more expensive engineering and construction. In addition to cracks in walls and' slabs, strain features include the following: bulges at wallboard seams, out-of-square door and window frames that cause rough operation, cracked footings, displacement of separate structural elements such as bfetween walls and chimneys or across contraction joints in slabs, and unusual variations in topography of the floor slab. H. CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES Some cracking of slabs, footing, and walls is considered normal and is necessary balance between benefits and costs. Minor cracking does serviceability of a house and has been considered generally acceptable. he result of a not affect the In some conditions a concrete slab or footing may develop a single large crack or numerous small cracks. Data I in Engineering Bulletin No. 3, Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures by the Portland Cement Association, indicated that a high-quality slab or footing that is 50 feet in dimension may experience 0.36 inches of shrinkage during the first 38 months after construction. Approximately 0.12 inches of shrinkage would occur during the first month and an additional 0.2 inches would occur in the next 10 months. Moreover, concrete in residential structures is often placed with high water content, high initial temperatures, small aggregate, and during hot and dry weather conditions. All of these can increase the amount of shrinkage. In some slabs, the shrinkage may be expressed as one or two cracks rather than being distributed as small shrinkage cracks. CAUSES OF PLASTIC SHRINKAGE CRACKS AND RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE MEASURES These highly unsightly cracks are caused by a rapid evaporation of water and surface drying of fresh concrete. Plastic concrete shrinkage cracks can be minimized by using good construction practices; such practices are listed below: . 1. Saturate the subgrade and forms. 2. Lower the temperature of the concrete in hot weather (over 85°F). 3. Reduce the time between placing the concrete and finishing it. 4. Provide environmental controls, such as sun-shades, windbreaks or temporary coverings. \ i 5. Don't overwork finishing effort as this will cause separation of ag jregates and bring excessive water to surface. 6. Provide expansion/contraction joints. These may be accomplished by "cold joint", expansion material joint, or sawcut, within 24 hours of pour. The glad to review your building plans and provide recommendations. Avoid adding excessive water to PCC mix, as this reduces concrelje strength and contributes to cracking. Engineer will be islHffl^r^^ ENGINEERING & SURVEYING 1525 S. Escondido Blvd. Suite A, Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 741-0533 FAX (760) 741-5794 August 7, 2001 City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave. Carlsbad, CA 92008 Job No. 4572 Site: 140 Chestnut, Carlsbad Subject: Compaction Testing To Whom It May Concern: Compaction testing has been completed for the parking lot ramp and retaining wall backfill at the above referenced location. Native material was used for backfill and compacted to a minimum of 90% relative compaction. This material was placed in approximately 4" lifts and compacted with a whacker. A representative from this firm was present to perform visual inspections as grading progressed and to perform relative compaction testing at representative locations to ensure that adequate compaction was obtained. A summary of our tests results and test location plat is attached hereto and made part of this Report. Density testing was performed in accordance with ASTM 2922 (Nuclear) and D1556 procedures. Sincerely, Herald a W J» S«E • 5g w j5-o 2 we K*3J 2 « Mo & g S^§•§•1& "X 5.' S^ rt.o TJ fofoo0o> w(DCDwg" o o o oen CO to-j o CO o NJOOOl wCDCD C/)ifo oo _» o CO o> 10 0 COGJ * toooA wCD(D 0) (T & oo _» ^ ^J 10 o CO(0 •^ fooo03 wCDCD CO 0s- o en JO NJ CJ !3 0 CO(Oro foooNJ C/3CD(D Cfl (D 0 O Ol O CO CO ^0 COO) 00 §oo. OT(DCD CO £ O o Ul _>. w CO O) 10 0 COco CD eH >" SO t/2* H IIM 0 o H > H O O W^w p O fas e M ^2! O 3 C 1 <Q 2 33 ow »-gj Q^S3 *; o 0 ? oo 2 ^ IT*^ j^ - H 3 O ^a- H00§ 1 139.8D COMPACTION1 1 ^^t 'j^j &5 I— »O h-* O 22 SS^•r ^Hk>•"* ftr ^« *!^ ^».n DI i"0 ^MAX.WETDENSITY (PCF20 C/J ii C 1 TORY COMPACT]11I^393 rt'S0 S 1 3 is I I I I *, 140 CHESTNUT AV CONDOS Carlsbad Climate Zone 7 Davis Group Plans for this project have been been reviewed. The following Title 24 energy report demonstrates compliance with California's Title 24 energy code for new residential projects. Mark Gallant, CEPE Compliance Method - MICROPAS v5.0 February 8, 2000 Haynal and Company, Inc. 425 W. 5th Ave, Ste. 201 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 743-5408 Contractor's License #649028 City of Carlsbad "n — •••—'———-—•• • i^^" •—— 1 ltfIMI4^B^RmWf^Hm^B9IB"^DHKIBBHH^MBflflUHH9UPttfl /J & Building CERTlFjpATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and tfie appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not| issue any ljuilding permit without a completed school lee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner(s; Name{s)) Project Building Type: Residential Zk fttf. J Number of New! Dwelling Units 0 Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Res. Additions: Cornerc./ ind.: City Certification of Applicant's information: Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-5291) Square Feet of living Are0 in SOU lling / "7 y7^/ '—Lf. f • / Net Square Feet New Areja Square Feet F.'oior Area ; WITHIN \JMjC\rf OF CARLS8AB E ncinit»s Union Sc 101 South Ranch Santa F« Rd s.-CA 92024 (944-43CO| :i San Marcos Unified School District i 215MataWay :i ._ San farces. CA 92069 (736-2200) _ : Sao pieouilo Union High School District : 710 Hnciniias Blvd. I Encihitas. CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant /'Owners. Ths person executing this declarc^on ("Owner") certifies under penalty of cor.iify lhat (ij the information pravided above is correct ano true to (lie b?st of the Owner's knowledge, and thet the Owner will file an amended certification of payment anc pay the additional (68 i? Qwn.er requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage afl«' tf-e ouitdinQ_Defmjlis issued _orjpbfrffinie!l detWTBinali^itHjnits or square foolage is tcund lo be incorrect, and inal (?) the Ov/perTTthe ovynfiStBveiijyjJTfif me aoovo flescn5y^Ppo,ect(s), or lhat trie person cxecuiing thi.<; decuiralton is <jn on UehallpMie Owo^r. Date: 2075 l.f.3 Palmes Or. * Carls p2009-T5f6 • (760) 438-1 161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 v,;ii i i i_-v'. itLt.1 vC ' 00 I :: 01 , T Ui" vTii'.^O M NO. 760 bU2 8558 P, .03 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by th^ school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: . | • The undersigned, being duly authorized by the Applicable School District, certifies (hat the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied'the obligation lor school taciltties. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has pa$ all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits (or this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL D/STRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER lyHcAflLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT \ \ JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY \ \ AVIARA OAKS ELEMENTARY | | CARLSBAD HJGH SCHOOL [ | MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY | j AVIARA OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL | | CARLSBAD VILLAGE ACADEMY [ \ PINE SCHOOL \ ' ] PACIFIC RIM | | VALLEY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL [ [ KELLY SCHOOL \ j OTHER | |BUENA VISTA SCHOOL [ \HOPESCHOOL Receipt No. 09083 RECEIVED FROM: (If Applicable) PARENT OF: DATE:1 AMOUNT RECEIVED B d City of Carlsbad Building Department DEMOLITION PERMIT REQUIREMENTS Gr A demolition permit may only be issued to the^owner^f the property or :£_lhe State Licensed Contractor that is doing the work. The contractor must provide use with a letter, signed and dated by the property owner, giving permission for the building to be demolished. The fee for a demolition permit is $30.00. The attached Demolition Asbestos Certification application must be completed, signed and have the correct square footage of the structure being demolished, as well as it's use. - • Applicant must provide a letter from San Diego Gas and Electric stating that the utilities have been disconnected. Arrange for appropriate Water Authority to remove water meter unless construction of replacement structure is to begin shortly. Contact the Planning Department at (760) 602-4625 or 602-4629 to determine if the structure is in the Redevelopment area, if it is in the Coastal Zone, or if it is on the list of Carlsbad Historic Sites. Contact the Engineering Department at (760) 602-2775 or 602-2741 to determine if a Haul Route or Right-of-Way Permit is required. Notify the Fire Department at (760) 602-4660 to see if they need the use of the building for training purposes. i:\word\forms\building\demolition permit requirements.doc REV August 9, 2000 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, GA 92008-7314 • (76O) 602-2700 - FAX (760) 602-8560 City of Carlsbad Building Department DEMOLITION ASBESTOS CERTIFICATION ADDRESS: USE OF BUILDING TO BE DEMOLISHED: SQUARE FEET X NUMBER OF STORIES PROPERTY OWNER: ADDRESS:PHONE APPLICANT: ADDRESS:PHONE Section 19827.5 of California Health and Safety Code states in part: "A demolition permit shall not be issued by any city ...as to any building or other structure except upon receipt from the permit applicant of a copy of each written asbestos notification regarding the building that has been required to be submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency or to a designated state agency, or both, pursuant to Part 61 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or the successor to that part. The permit may be issued without the applicant submitting a copy of the written notification if the applicant declares that the notification is not applicable to the scheduled demolition project." " As applicant for a demolition permit in the City of Carlsbad, I certify that; I have read the excerpt from Section 19827.5 of the Health and Safety Code provided above; the information I have provided on this form is true and correct; and I further certify the following: ( ) On the attached pages are copies of all written asbestos notifications regarding the above referenced building that are required to be submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency or to Part 61 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, or successor to that part. ( ) I declare that the written asbestos notification is not applicable to the scheduled Date i:\word\forms\building\demolition permit requirements.doc REV August 9, 2000 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (76O) 602-8560 04/02/2001 .09:43 _ 7605990468 PAC WEST LAND CARE I PAGE 02 I...!•TO. i BY. BY. i- ;-rM! »s : ifBAM: .SP5F NOTIC =HWJ DEPARTMENT j^gjKy>' '"TV r»F- ;u ^~/s fa .ECTPIC AND/«^R GAS SERVICI ) ~3W3L _eTAKLT ADDRESS 3- 3LST 01WTE IS BUILDING CAN BE MOVED in Qfoc&Q**& Gfa&tto — x / .._./*/LHp 4r^ r, 7-^0:C^/ : 76O 4«^ TBT i « 2 .• 2 ''• i . • ;• ••• '' • (,',';;•. '. >. . '....'. .' ' '.''•' -^. SUl* . :. ''•'•'•••'".[••' " "" 4PHPP|r ^*- ' - • ' ' 89nDi99*ai*&ei*otrtc :• '<• ' •'•'•'/ ' E OF SERVICE DISCONTINUANCE ••*»'" LT.WLi^z?'. • - ;.:•'•• •'.'•'• •WILLBiOISCQNTJNUEO ' ') •SAID JRL cn • • ...' :.'; ; •$••'•>.* '"•.•'• ; : — All SPBwipf UNSS'V\rtl'l RPRPMOVFD • )RRAZEO AFTER THE ABOVE DATE ' '/"^ ' : • ': •'•-'• '*"> AeAA*fo»jit ' • .-..',• .'.. ••.•...••.;• ; . .• . • •'. , l: ^ ^ ' ~~7 / -f*i'- '-''LJ&^-'-^-^J f~*i-'-*\ i-•••'*• PUONE J/.4SJ Vff( V vV&^fll D •' . . HMMM*3ltt(Qi91U}0«|W ~" . •..« '.. ••„ •' •... i . . • • • . .•;. . '. •,'••••.'. '•' '.••'..' .•"' : '•••'.•* /v*:K^'£<«£i^^^ :• • ''•'! •''-•