Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020 CHESTNUT AVE; ; CB003760; Permit
02/09/200 f City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Commercial/Industrial Permit Permit No: CB003760 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: Project Title: 02/06/2001 2020 CHESTNUT AV CBAD COMMIND Sub Type: COMM 2053302600 Lot#: 0 $85,760.00 Construction Type: NEW Reference #: CB993075 PILGRIM CHURCH-1280 SF KITCHEN MULTI-PURPOSE ROOMS Applicant: WORTHING INC, B. A. 690 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DR CARLSBAD, CA 92008 619-729-3965 Status: Applied: Issued: Inspect Area: ISSUED 10/10/2000 Entered By: Plan Approved: 02/09/2001 RMA Owner: PILGRIM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OF CALRSBAD 2020 CHESTNUT AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 U55 02/09/01 0002 01 02 COP 699-02 Total Fees: $1,063.03 Total Payments To Date: $364.01 Balance Due: $699.02 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $560.01 Meter Size $0.00 Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee $364.01 Meter Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $18.01 PFF $0.00 , PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 License Tax $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) $0.00 LFMZ Transportation Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL Master Drainage Fee: $0.00 Sewer Fee: . ,.,. $0.00 ' Redev Parking Fee;' ^ - lL f TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $62.00 $35.00 $24.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,063.03 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PERMIT APPLldATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1. PROJECT INFORMATION OFFICE USE Q PLAN CHECK EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date "/Qliolnrn Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Assessor's Parcel # _ 2-05 ^0 " *-b Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Existing Use Unit No. Phase No. Proposed Use0622 10/10/00 Oi Total # of units 301 01 Q2 Description Jjf Work i , \ SQ. FT. 2. CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant! Address D Agent for Contractor Name 5. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Sestion 7031.5 by any applicant for aneimit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]iS7 rV • I I . -~ i \J * v I ~ *\^ *-~ - I *^. A I xtkt.l I .*• .*•» _—_ * j53 _*• * M •••*.»• *^ srn Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # 'TfrUOVt? IMX <H\ I Address — S\ L^\s> l~l ; ~ \ CitV (>f |^?&3 State/ZiP ^ TelephoneDesigner Name State License # 6. WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. >Q/^ I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is Sued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: 1 , ^_ _ i I Insurance Company ^7ty$& H^N^cL Policy No2.^"l ~uO C/Mv U^"^ I Expiration Date O\ f®\ JO\ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) n CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secuw^workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100/JXm)/i« addition to the cost of^ompensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE X*>^''V./\-^ S^^ DATE Z. j "i". OWNER-BUILBER-DE^-ARATION 1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractors License Law for the following reason: O I. as owner of the property or my employees wrih wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contlactor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own empfqyees, prodded that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner^btHWSf will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). O I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). n I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. l~l YES r~)NO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? Q YES fj] NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? [J] YES fj NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? Q YES D NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 8, CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 30970) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the CitV of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 18Q days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commfiocgaTDr a perjwj^fJSO days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ^^^fotfvl/V (\ "ATE V-^lDATE WHIITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Plan Check #: Permit #: Project Name: Address: Contact Person: Sewer Dist: Inspected^ Bv: /'I * Inspected Bv: Inspected Bv: Comments: CB003760 PILGRIM CHURCH-1280 SF KITCHEN MULTI-PURPOSE ROOMS 2020 CHESTNUT AV TERESA Phone: 7607293965 CA Water Dist: CA SI - y Date s?l / U^/^i>fjZ^c\ ^-Inspected: *j5{j/&/ U Date Inspected: Date Inspected: Date: Permit Type: Sub Type: Lot: 0 f Approved: *• • Approved: Approved: 09/10/2001 COMMIND COMM 'Disapproved: Disapproved: Disapproved: City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept: Building ^Engineering Planning CMWD StLite Fire Plan Check*: Permit*: Project Name: Address: ESCE3^13> SEP I 3 2001 Cif V" CB003760 PILGRIM CHURCH-1280SF KITCHEN MULTI-PURPOSE ROOMS 2020 CHESTNUT AV Date: . Permit Type: COMMIND Sub Type: COMM Lot: Contact Person: TERESA Sewer Dist:CA Phone: 7607293965 Water Dist: CA Inspected By: Inspected By: Inspected By: Date Inspected: Date Inspected: Date Inspected: .Approved: .Approved: Approved: Disapproved: Disapproved: Disapproved: Comments: City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 09/14/2001 Permit* CB003760 Title: PILGRIM CHURCH-1280 SF KITCHEN Description: MULTI-PURPOSE ROOMS Inspector Assignment: PY Type:COMMIND Sub Type: COMM Job Address: 2020 CHESTNUT AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT WORTHING INC, B. A. Owner: PILGRIM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OF CALRSBAD Remarks: Phone: 7607293965 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: TERESA Entered By: KAREN CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Act Comment Associated PCRs Inspection History Date 09/10/200 08/31/200 08/21/200 08/21/200 08/08/200 08/08/200 08/07/200 06/11/200 05/30/200 05/29/200 05/25/200 05/25/200 05/25/200 05/21/200 05/15/200 05/15/200 Description 89 Final Combo 19 Final Structural 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 97 T-24 H-Cap Consultation 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 97 T-24 H-Cap Consultation 97 T-24 H-Cap Consultation 45 Hoods 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 1 8 Exterior Lath/Drywall 16 Insulation 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers Act CA CO NR NR we CO NR AP AP NR we AP AP AP PA PA Insp GG PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY RB RB Comments SEE NOTICE ATTACHED RAMP 1ST LAYER @ CORRIDOR 1ST LAYER ©SHAFT OK OK EXCEPT KIT. EXHAUST & MAKE UP AIR Inspection List Permit#: CB003760 Type: COMMIND COMM Date Inspection Item Inspector Act 09/14/2001 89 09/14/2001 89 09/10/2001 89 09/10/2001 89 08/31/2001 19 08/21/2001 11 08/21/2001 97 08/08/2001 14 08/08/2001 97 • 08/07/2001 97 06/11/2001 45 05/30/2001 17 05/29/2001 17 05/25/2001 14 05/25/2001 17 05/25/2001 18 05/21/2001 16 - 05/15/2001 17 05/15/2001 44 05/15/2001 84 05/11/2001 14 05/11/2001 24 05/11/2001 34 05/11/2001 44 04/27/2001 16 04/12/2001 13 04/06/2001 15 04/04/2001 15 03/30/2001 11 03/30/2001 21 03/29/2001 11 03/29/2001 23 03/28/2001 21 03/27/2001 21 03/21/2001 14 03/21/2001 16 03/16/2001 11 03/16/2001 11 03/15/2001 11 Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Combo Final Structural Ftg/Foundation/Piers T-24 H-Cap Consultation Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin T-24 H-Cap Consultation T-24 H-Cap Consultation Hoods Interior Lath/Drywall Interior Lath/DrywallI Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Interior Lath/Drywall Exterior Lath/Drywall Insulation Interior Lath/Drywall Rough/Ducts/Dampers Rough Combo Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Rough/Topout Rough Electric Rough/Ducts/Dampers Insulation Shear Panels/HD's Roof/Reroof Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Underground/Under Floor Ftg/Foundation/Piers Gas/Test/Repairs Underground/Under Floor Underground/Under Floor Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin Insulation Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers Ftg/Foundation/Piers JC - - GG PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY RB RB RB RB RB RB RB AR PY PY PY PY PY PD PD PY PY TP TP PY PY PY AP Rl Rl CA CO NR NR we CO NR AP AP NR we AP AP AP PA PA AP CO AP AP CO AP AP AP AP AP AP NR AP AP CO AP AP AP AP NR PILGRIM CHURCH-1280 SF KITCHEN MULTI-PURPOSE ROOMS Comments SEE NOTICE ATTACHED RAMP 1ST LAYER @ CORRIDOR 1ST LAYER @ SHAFT OK OK EXCEPT KIT. EXHAUST & MAKE AIR SEE ATTACHED NOTICE REVISE PLANS TO SHOW BEAM AT KITCHEN MULTI PURPOSE ROOM RE-ROUTED OUTSIDE BLDG UP OK UNDER SLAB - RECHECK OUTSIDE BLDG SEE NOTICE ATTACHED SUB FLR FRM SUBFLR REMOVE / RELOCATE GAS LINE PRIOR TO SHEETING FLOOR MULTI PURPOSE ROOM S/E SIDE GAS LINE RUN THROUGH FTGS TO ABANDON IN FUTURE ?? BE Monday, September 17,2001 Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 08/31/2001 Permit* CB003760 Title: PILGRIM CHURCH-1280 SF KITCHEN Description: MULTI-PURPOSE ROOMS Sub Type: COMM Inspector Assignment: PY 2020 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type: COMMIND Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT WORTHING INC, B. A. Owner: PILGRIM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OF CALRSBAD Remarks: Phone: 7607293965 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: TERSA Entered By: CHRISTINE Act CommentsCo Associated PCRs Insoection Historv Date* .08/21/2001 08/21/2001 08/08/2001 08/08/2001 08/07/2001 06/11/2001 05/30/2001 05/29/2001 05/25/2001 05/25/2001 05/25/2001 05/21/2001 05/15/2001 05/15/2001 05/15/2001 05/11/2001 Description 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 97 T-24 H-Cap Consultation 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 97 T-24 H-Cap Consultation 97 T-24 H-Cap Consultation 45 Hoods 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall 16 Insulation 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 84 Rough Combo 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Act NR NR we CO NR AP AP NR • we AP AP AP PA PA AP CO Insp PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY RB RB RB RB Comments RAMP 1ST LAYER @ CORRIDOR 1ST LAYER ©SHAFT OK OK EXCEPT KIT. EXHAUST & MAKE UP AIR CITY OF CARLSBAD •>' BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE LOCATION .PERMIT NO (760)602-2700 ,; 1635 FARADAY AVENUE FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? LJ YES r .; . FOR FURTHER IMFORMATION, CONTACT BUILDING INSPECTOR" PHONE' CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ® City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 05/11/2001 Permit# CB003760 Title. PILGRIM CHURCH-1280 SF KITCHEN Description: MULTI-PURPOSE ROOMS Type:COMMIND Sub Type: COMM Job Address: 2020 CHESTNUT AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT WORTHING INC, B. A. Owner. PILGRIM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OF CALRSBAD Remarks: Inspector Assignment: PY Phone: 7607293965 Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: TERESA Entered By: ROBIN CD Description - Act Comments 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 24 Rough/Topout 34 Rough Electric 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers Associated PCRs Inspection Historv Date 04/27/2001 04/12/2001 04/06/2001 04/04/2001 03/30/2001 03/30/2001 03/29/2001 03/29/2001 03/28/2001 03/27/2001 03/21/2001 03/21/2001 03/16/2001 03/16/2001 03/15/2001 Description 16 Insulation 13 Shear Panels/HD's 15Roof/Reroof 1 5 Roof/Reroof 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 21 Underground/Under Floor 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 21 Underground/Under Floor 21 Underground/Under Floor 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 16 Insulation 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act AP AP AP AP AP AP NR AP AP CO AP AP AP AP NR Insp AR PY PY PY PY PY PD PD PY PY TP TP PY PY PY Comments REVISE PLANS TO SHOW BEAM AT KITCHEN MULTI PURPOSE ROOM RE-ROUTED OUTSIDE BLDG OK UNDER SLAB - RECHECK OUTSIDE BLDG SEE NOTICE ATTACHED SUB FLR FRM SUB FLR REMOVE / RELOCATE GAS LINE PRIOR TO SHEETING FLOOR MULTI PURPOSE ROOM S/E SIDE GAS LINE RUN THROUGH FTGS TO BE ABANDON IN FUTURE ?? CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTICE (760)602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE DATE " ^ /TIME LOCATION "3-03-0 C PERMIT NO. ,r?. f- C- Q /A 3,< /> « ,? /£)• I 5 ~? '> « / / - £ >^ j/z , Jc /?* FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT _ YES PHONE BUILDING INSPECTOR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ® , City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 03/27/2001 Permit# CB003760 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: PILGRIM CHURCH-1280 SF KITCHEN Description: MULTI-PURPOSE ROOMS Type:COMMIND Sub Type: COMM Phone: 7607293965 Job Address: 2020 CHESTNUT AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: Inspector: APPLICANT WORTHING INC, B. A. Owner: PILGRIM UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST OF CALRSBAD Remarks: Total Time: Requested By: TERESA Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments 21 Underground/Under Floor Associated PCRs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 03/21/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP TP " SUB FLR FRM 03/21/2001 16 Insulation. AP TP SUB FLR ^•'03/16/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY REMOVE / RELOCATE GAS LINE PRIOR TO SHEETING FLOOR .-^03/16/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY MULTI PURPOSE ROOM S/E SIDE 03/15/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers NR PY GAS LINE RUN THROUGH FTGS TO BE ABANDON IN FUTURE ?? CITY OF CARLSBAD. BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE NOTICE LOCATION. PERMIT NO. (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE TIME FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURTblER INFORMATION, CONTAQT ''' . ^ > __ '_ YES .-:' PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER © COAST GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS March 12, 2001 Richard Allen Pilgrim United Church of Christ 2020 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: PROPOSED ADDITIONS Pilgrim United Church of Christ 2020 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California NOTICE OF FOOTING EXCAVATION OBSERVATION 1) The footing excavations including continuous wall and column pads for the proposed additions have been observed by this firm. 2) The septic tank encountered in the northern addition footing and slab area was cleaned of debris, as previously recommended in the Field Memo, dated March 8, 2001. The tank will be backfilled with concrete. 3) The footing excavations are founded into Pleistocene terrace deposits, as recommended in our Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, dated May 10, 2000. However, recent rains have resulted in sloughing along the footing side walls and accumulated debris along the base of the footing excavations. 779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH • CALIFORNIA 92075 (858) 755-8622 • FAX (858) 755-9126 a i Coast Geotechnical March 12, 2001 W.O. G-313040 Page 2 4) The footing excavations are approved by this firm provided all loose deposits are removed from the base of the excavation prior to pouring concrete. The footing excavations were not reviewed for compliance with structural plans and location. 5) No utility lines were excavated at this time. The proposed five (5) inch thick concrete slab in the northern addition should bridge over localized loose areas in the slab subgrade. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact our office. Reference to our Job No. P-313040 will help expedite a response to your inquiry. I Respectfully submitt( m COAST GEOTECHN CERTIFIED ENGINEERING GEOLOGISTMark Burwell, C.E.G. Engineering Geologist EsGil Corporation In fa.rtnersfi.ip with, government for 'BuiCding Safety DATE: February 2, 2O01 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3760 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2020 Chestnut Ave. PROJECT NAME: Pilgrim United Church of Christ Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. y The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 1/29/01 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ^ San Diego, California 92123 ^ (858)560-1468 ^ Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGiS Corporation In Partners/tip with government for "Bulbting Safety DATE: October 16, 2000 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad OPTATmEVIEWER D FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: OO-3760 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2020 Chestnut Ave. PROJECT NAME: Pilgrim United Church of Christ Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. XI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. X3 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: B.A. Worthing Inc. P.O. Box 1041 Carlsbad 92018 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Brooks Worthing (U'rvkA Telephone #: (76(9) 729-3965 Date contacted: (o-n-oo (by:£**w) Fax #:-0784 Mail -^ Telephone^- Fax-' In Person X] REMARKS: Previously 99-3075. By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 10/10/00 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 ^ San Diego, California 92123 ^ (858)560-1468 ^ Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad OQ-3760 October 16, 2000 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3760 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad OCCUPANCY: A-3 USE: Church TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N ACTUAL AREA: +1280 ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: OK STORIES: 1 HEIGHT: -11' SPRINKLERS?: No . OCCUPANT LOAD: +-150 REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 10/10/00 ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/10/00 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Kurt Culver COMPLETED: October 16, 2000 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1997 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform, Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 00-376O October 16, 20OO • GENERAL 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. • PLANS 2. All sheets of the plans are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Business and Professions Code. • CORRIDORS 3. Doors should not project more than 7 inches into the required corridor width when fully opened, nor more than one-half of the required corridor width when in any position. Section 1004.3. THE CORRIDOR IS TOO NARROW. 4. Exit corridors shall not be interrupted by,intervening rooms. Foyers, lobbies or reception rooms constructed as for corridors shall not be construed as intervening rooms. Section 1004.3.4.4. THE KITCHEN REPRESENTS AN INTERVENING ROOM. 5. The total area of windows in any portion of an interior corridor shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of a common wall with any room. Such openings shall be protected by fixed glazing listed and labeled for a fire-protection rating of at least 3/4-hour. Section 1004.3.4.3.2.2. 6. Provide a complete architectural section of the corridor, showing all fire-resistive materials and details of construction for all floor, walls, roof and all penetrations. Section 1004.3.4. a) At Section B/2, either show a "tunnel" type corridor ceiling, or revise the detail to show that the one-hour walls extend all the way up, and have solid blocking above the top plates (extending to the roof plywood). Carlsbad 00-3760 October 16, 200O « TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS 7. Provide notes and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more restrictive than the UBC. • STRUCTURAL 8. Provide minimum structural specifications on the plans to show that all structural materials will comply with the design calculations and building code requirements. 9. Please show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per Section 1630.1.1. o ADDITIONAL 10. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 11. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Q Yes Q No 12. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgi| Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 00-3760 October 16, 200O DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECT NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS The following disabled access items are taken from the 1998 edition of California Building Code, Title 24. Per Section 101.17.11, all publicly and privately funded public accommodations and commercial facilities shall be accessible to persons with disabilities. NOTE: All Figures and Tables referenced in this checklist are printed in the California Building Code, Title 24. SINGLE ACCOMMODATION FACILITIES 1. Revise plans to show a sufficient space in the toilet room for a wheelchair to enter the room and close the door, per Section 1115B.7.2. The space is required to be: a) >60" diameter. b) A T-shaped space as shown in Figure 11B-12(a) and (b). c) Doors are not permitted to encroach into this space by more than 12 inches. 2. Show that the water closet is located in a space, per Section 1115B7.2, which provides: a) A minimum side clearance of either: i) >28" from a fixture. ii) >32" from a wall on one side, k) >AQ" cloar space in front of tho water closet. Carlsbad Op-3760 October 16, 2000 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: OO-3760 PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver DATE: October 16, 2000 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2020 Chestnut Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY:TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: BUILDING PORTION Air Conditioninq Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier #N/A 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee ^ Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) #N/A 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee #N/A Type of Review: dl Repetitive Fee PI Complete Review CH Structural Only Repeats D Other D Hourly Esgil Plan Review Fee #N/A Comments: No fee for this review (it's actually only a recheck of 99-3075, and there have been no code changes since that initial review). Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc Carlsbad Fire Department 003760 1635 Faraday Ave. • Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Requirements Category: Date of Report: 02/07/2001 -, Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Building Plan Reviewed by: B. Worthing PlansName: Address: PO Box 1041 City, State: Carlsbad CA 92018 Plan Checker: Job Name: Pilgrim Church Job Address: 2020 Chestnut Avenue Job #: 003760 Bldg #: CB003760 Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Approved Subject to The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and / or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Incomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. Review FDJob# 1st 2n<1 3rd 003760 FD File # Other Agency ID ,'vGarlsbad Fire Department 003760 1635 Faraday-Ave. . . Carlsbad, CA 92008 Plan Review Requirements Category: Date of Report: 11/06/2000 Fire Prevention (760) 602-4660 Building Plan Reviewed by: Name: "Address: BrWorthing Plans PO Box 1041 City, State: Carlsbad CA 92018 Plan Checker: Job Name: Pilgrim Church Job #: 003760 Job Address: 2020 Chestnut Avenue Bldg #: CB003760 Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and / or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes and standards. Please review carefully all comments attached as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Approved The item you have submitted for review has been approved subject to the Subject to attached conditions. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Please resubmit to this office the necessary plans and /or specifications required to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Incomplete The item you have submitted for review is incomplete. At this time, this office cannot adequately conduct a review to determine compliance with the applicable codes and / or standards. Please review carefully all comments attached. Please resubmit the necessary plans and / or specifications to this office for review and approval. Review FDJob# 1st 2nd 3rd 003760 FD File # Other Agency ID Requirements Category:Building Plan Requirement: Pending 05:18 Fire Extinguishers Required Provide one 2A1OBC fire extinguisher for each 6000 square feet or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. Provide notes on the plans that the extinguisher will be provided. Requirement: Pending 05.26 Exit Illumination Exits shall be illuminated at any time the building is occupied with light having intensity of not less than 1 footcandle at floor level. The power supply for exit illumination shall normally be provided by the premises' wiring system. In the event of its failure, illumination shall be automatically provided from an emergency system of Group I, Division 1 Occupancies and for all other occupancies where the exiting system serves an occupant load of 100 or more. Requirement: Pending 05.27 Occupant Load Signs Any room having an occupant load of 50 or more where fixed seats are not installed, and which is used for classroom, assembly or similar purpose, shall have the capacity of the room posted in a conspicuous place. Requirement: Pending 05.32 Additional Requirements or Comments Provide infomation on existing doors in corridor are 20 minutes. Requirement: Pending 05.33 Plan Revisions Please submit 3 sets of corrected plans directly to the Building Department for routing to the appropriate departments. Page 1 11/06/00 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB DATE 160 ADDRESS RESIDENTIAL TENANT IMPROVEMENT RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR « $10,000.00) PLAZA CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER PLANNER DATE ENGINEER DATE Docs/Misforms/Planning Engineering Approvals City of Carlsbad Building Department APPLICATION FOR UNREASONABLE HARDSHIP EXCEPTION TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS (EXISTING.BUJPLDINGS; CHAPTER 31, DIVISION III, Sec. 3112A.(a) exc. 1.) When existing buildings are remodeledwrf, when the valuation of the modifications is less than approximately 80,000 dollars, the California State Building Code allows relief from some accessibility requirements when the cost of compliance with those regulations is disproportionate. Disporportionate cost is defined as when the cost of all compliance requirements except mandatory measures exceeds 20% of the cost of the project. Where the cost of alterations necessary to fully comply is disproportionate, access shall be provided to the extent that it can without incurring disproportionate costs. In other words, accessible elements must be provided or upgraded to a maximum cost of 20% of the project valuation. Priority for providing access should be given in the following ordefc An accessible entrance, B. An accessible route to the altered area, C. At least one accessible restroom for each sex, D. Accessible telephones, E. Accessible drinking fountains, and F. When possible, additional accessible elements such as parking storage and alarms. NOTE: SEE CHAPTER 31, DIVISION III, CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE FOR MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS AND THE COMPLETE TEXT OF THE REGULATIONS FOR ACCESS COMPLIANCE IN EXISTING BUILDINGS. DOCUMENTATION OF UNREASQNABm-HAi!sHiP!l:^^ PLEASE PRINT .'/• "/^ Project Address? :<£Q2O ••-',.v ;•«•• V Proposetf llsef Owner: Applicant: molJt, Signature: Please print Name 02/17/98 >.••-< *"^ -.v-'c s>;->^ '-; • Plan Check #: ' C\SOO "^ /'^.Telephone: 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (76O) 438-1161 • FAX (76O) 438-0894 WORKSHEET FOR DISPORPORTIONATE COSTS 1. PROJECT VALUATION 2.VALUATION OF OTHER AREAS WITH SAME PATH OF TRAVEL (Total valuation dating back to January 26, 1992) 3.TOTALOFLINE1&2 i 2j ll IF LINE 3 EXCEEDS THRESHOLD AMOUNT( $86,770 ), FULL COMPLIANCE IS REQUIRED IF LINE THREE IS LESS THAN THRESHOLD AMOUNT, COMPLETE WORKSHEET. 4.ESTIMATED COST OF UPGRADING ENTIRE PATH OF TRAVEL _ 5.PROPORTIONATE COMPLIANCE COST (Divide line 4 by line 3) 6.ENTER TWENTY PERCENT OF PROJECT VALUATION 7.MINIMUM COMPLIANCE COST OBLIGATION of lines 5&6) (Lesser INDICATE BELOW HOW COST OF COMPLIANCE OBLIGATION WILL BE SPENT ITEM ESTIMATED COST SIGNATURE OF^APPROVINGkUTHORITY: PLEASE ATTACH THIS DOCUMENT TO THE APPROVED PLANS FOR THE USE OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR AND THE CONTRACTOR.-vTHANK YOU' ' '"' 02/17/98 1 :- .- o-' . -.- ff -.;„••'-£-»"••* -- J/' A;. '« y ITCM MOTES COAST GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS June 1, 2000 Richard Allen Pilgrim United Church of Christ 2020 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Pilgrim United Church of Christ Proposed Addition 2020 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California Reference: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Pilgrim United Church of Christ Proposed Addition 2020 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California Prepared by Coast Geotechnical Dated May 10, 2000 Dear Mr. Allen: As requested, we have reviewed the project foundation plans prepared by B. Worthing Plan Service and observed that they have, in general, included the recommendations presented in our Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, (Job No. P-313040). COMMENTS 1) Proposed stem wall footings should be founded the designed depth into competent terrace deposits. The depth to terrace deposits will vary across the site. 779 ACADEMY DRIVE • SOLANA BEACH • CALIFORNIA 92075 (858) 755-8622 • FAX (858) 755-9126 Coast Geotechnical June 1, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 2 2) Footing excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm prior to placement of steel and forms. LIMITATIONS The findings and opinions presented herein have been made in accordance with generally accepted professional principals in the fields of geotechnical engineering. No warranty is provided. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact our office. Reference to our Job No. P-313040 will help expedite a response to your inquiry. Respectfully submitt COAST GEOTECH Mark Burwell, Engineering CERTIFIED ENGINEERING Vithaya Singhanet, P. Geotechnical Engineer COAST GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS May 10, 2000 Richard Allen Pilgrim United Church of Christ 2020 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Subject: LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Pilgrim United Church of Christ Proposed Addition 2020 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Allen: In response to your request and in accordance with our Proposal and Agreement dated April 13, 2000, we have performed a preliminary geotechnical investigation on the subject site for the proposed addition. The findings of the investigation, laboratory test results and recommendations for foundation design are presented in this report. From a geotechnical point of view, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the recommendations in this report are implemented during the design and construction phases. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us at (858) 755-8622. This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. Respectfully submittej COAST GEOTECHN Mark Burwell, C.E.G. Engineering Geologist _Vithaya/Singhanet, P. Geotechnical Engineer 779 ACADEMY DRIVE . SOLANA BEACH • CALIFORNIA 92075 (858) 755-8622 - FAX (858) 755-9126 LIMITED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Addition Pilgrim United Church of Christ 2020 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California Prepared For: Richard Allen Pilgrim United Church of Christ 2020 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Prepared By: COAST GEOTECHNICAL 779 Academy Drive Solana Beach, California 92075 TABLE OF CONTENTS VICINITY MAP INTRODUCTION 5 SITE CONDITIONS 5 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 5 SITE INVESTIGATION 5 LABORATORY TESTING 6 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS 7 CONCLUSIONS 10 RECOMMENDATIONS 11 A. REMOVALS/GRADING/RECOMPACTION 11 B. FOUNDATIONS 11 C. SLABS ON GRADE (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) 12 D. SETTLEMENT CHARACTERISTICS 13 E. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS 13 F. SEISMIC PARAMETERS 14 G. UTILITY TRENCH 14 H. DRAINAGE 15 I. GEOTECHNICAL OBSERVATIONS 15 J. PLAN REVIEW 15 LIMITATIONS 16 REFERENCES 18 APPENDICES APPENDIX A LABORATORY TEST RESULTS BORING LOG TEST PIT LOG SITE PLAN APPENDIX B REGIONAL FAULT MAP EARTHQUAKE FAULT ANALYSIS APPENDIX C GRADING GUIDELINES '\ •. Ma^noli } 'UrHifch 5cH* V^ VICINITY MAP COAST GEOTECHN1CAL Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 5 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering investigation on the subject property. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the nature and characteristics of the surficial deposits underlying the property and their influence on the construction of the proposed addition. SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is located along the northeast corner of Monroe Street and Chestnut Avenue, in the city of Carlsbad. The site includes a church and associated structures situated on level to very gently westerly sloping terrain. The property is bounded along the north and east by developed residential lots. Vegetation includes residential landscaping consisting of grass and trees along the southern yard area. Drainage is generally directed to the south by sheet flow. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Preliminary plans for the addition were prepared by B. Worthing Design. The project includes the construction of a single-story addition along the southern portion of the site. The addition will be supported on conventional footings with a slab on grade floor. SITE INVESTIGATION One 3.5 inch diameter exploratory boring was drilled in the side yard area of the site to Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 6 a maximum depth of 8.5 feet. One test pit was excavated adjacent to the existing stem wall foundation. Earth materials encountered were visually classified and logged by our field engineering geologist. Relatively undisturbed and bulk samples of earth materials were obtained at selected intervals. Samples were obtained by driving a thin walled steel sampler into the desired strata, where possible. The samples are retained in brass rings of 2.5 inches outside diameter and 1.0 inches in height. The central portion of the sample is retained in close fitting, waterproof containers and transported to our laboratory for testing and analysis. LABORATORY TESTING Classification The field classification was verified through laboratory examination, in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. The final classification is shown on the enclosed Exploratory Logs. Moisture/Density The field moisture content and dry unit weight were determined for each of the undisturbed soil samples. This information is useful in providing a gross picture of the soil consistency or variation among exploratory excavations. The dry unit weight was determined in pounds per cubic foot. The field moisture content was determined as a percentage of the dry unit weight. Both are shown on the enclosed Laboratory Test Results. Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 7 Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were determined for selected samples of earth materials taken from the site. The laboratory standard tests were in accordance with ASTM D-15 57-91. The results of the tests are presented in the Laboratory Test Results. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS The subject property is underlain at relatively shallow depths by Pleistocene terrace deposits. The terrace deposits are underlain at depth by Eocene-age sedimentary rocks which have commonly been designated as the Santiago Formation on published geologic maps. The terrace deposits are overlain by residual soil. A brief description of the earth materials encountered on the site is discussed below. Soil Approximately 2.0 to 3.0 feet of sandy soil was encountered in the exploratory boring and test pit, respectively. The soil is very damp to wet and consists of silty and fine-grained sand. Numerous roots are present in the soil profile due to apparent tree removal in the area of the proposed addition. Terrace Deposits Underlying the soil veneer, Pleistocene-age terrace deposits were encountered. The Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 8 sedimentary unit is composed of reddish brown, fine and medium-grained, slightly clayey sand. The terrace deposits are dense but weakly cemented. Regionally, the Pleistocene sands are considered flat-lying and are underlain at depth by Eocene-age sedimentary rock units. Expansive Soil Based on our experience in the area and previous laboratory testing of selected samples, the terrace deposits reflect an expansion potential in the low range. Ground Water No evidence of perched or high ground water tables were noted during exploration, however, a wet condition was noted along the soil/terrace deposit contact in Test Pit No. 1. Based on our experience in the area, major ground water related problems are not anticipated during construction. However, it should be noted that seepage problems can develop after completion of construction. These seepage problems most often result from drainage alterations, landscaping and over-irrigation. In the event that seepage or saturated ground does occur, it has been our experience that they are most effectively handled on an individual basis. Tectonic Setting The site is located within the seismically active southern California region which is Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 9 generally characterized by northwest trending Quaternary-age fault zones. Several of these fault zones and fault segments are classified as active by the California Division of Mines and Geology (Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act). Based on a review of published geologic maps, no known faults transverse the site. Several steeply dipping short fault segment have been mapped in the regional area of the site. These northeast trending faults are exposed in the Eocene-age rocks of the Santiago Formation but not in the overlying Pleistocene terrace deposits and are presumably inactive. The nearest active fault is the offshore Rose Canyon Fault Zone located approximately 6.0 miles west of the site. It should be noted that the Rose Canyon Fault is not a continuous, well-defined feature but rather a zone of right stepping en echelon faults. The complex series of faults has been referred to as the Offshore Zone of Deformation (Woodward- Clyde, 1979) and is not fully understood. Several studies suggest that the Newport- Inglewood and the Rose Canyon faults are a continuous zone of en echelon faults (Treiman, 1984). Further studies along the complex offshore zone of faulting may indicate a potentially greater seismic risk than current data suggests. Other faults which could affect the site include the Coronado Bank, Elsinore, San Jacinto and San Andreas Faults. The proximity of major faults to the site and site parameters are shown on the enclosed Earthquake Fault Analysis. Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 10 Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction is a process by which a sand mass loses its shearing strength completely and flows. The temporary transformation of the material into a fluid mass is often associated with ground motion resulting from an earthquake. Owing to the moderately dense nature of the Pleistocene terrace deposits and the anticipated depth to ground water, the potential for seismically induced liquefaction and soil instability is considered low. CONCLUSIONS 1) The subject lot is located in an area that is relatively free of potential geologic hazards such as landsiiding, deep-canyon fills, ground water and seismically induced subsidence. 2) The soil encountered on the site is loose, wet and contains numerous roots. The soil is not suitable for the support of proposed foundations or slabs on grade. 3) The soil should be removed, cleaned of roots and debris, and replaced as properly compacted fill for foundation and slab support. 4) As an alternative, the footings may be founded into the underlying terrace deposits Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 11 and a structural slab or a raised wood floor may be utilized. Footings would be on the order of 3-0 to 4.0 feet deep, in this regard. RECOMMENDATIONS Removals/Grading/Recompaction As previously indicated, the root infested soil should be removed to the underlying terrace deposits. Removals are estimated to range from 2.0 to 3-0 feet. However, removals should extend to a depth such that a minimum of 1.5 feet of fill is located beneath the base of proposed footings. Removals should extend a minimum of 5.0 lateral feet beyond the building footprint. Prior to placement of fill, the base of the excavation should be observed by this firm. The existing earth deposits are generally suitable for reuse provided they are cleaned of all roots, vegetation, debris and thoroughly mixed. Fill should be placed in 6.0 to 8.0 inch loose lifts, moistened as required to 2.0-3.0 percent above optimum moisture, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. Additional recommendations will be presented should any unforeseen conditions be encountered during grading. Imported fill, if necessary, should be composed of non-expansive granular deposits approved by this firm. Foundations The following preliminary design parameters are based on footings founded into approved compacted fill. Footings for the proposed addition should be a minimum of Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 12 12 inches wide and founded a minimum of 12 inches below the lower most adjacent subgrade at the time of foundation construction for single-story structures. Footings should be reinforced with a minimum of four No. 4 bars, two along the top of the footing and two along the base. Footing recommendations provided herein are based upon underlying soil conditions and are not intended to be in lieu of the project structural engineer's design. For design purposes, an allowable bearing value of 1500 pounds per square foot may be used for foundations at the recommended footing depths. The bearing value indicated above is for the total dead and frequently applied live loads. This value may be increased by 33 percent for short durations of loading, including the effects of wind and seismic forces. Resistance to lateral load may be provided by friction acting at the base of foundations and by passive earth pressure. A coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used with dead- load forces. A passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot, per foot of depth of fill penetrated to a maximum of 1500 pounds per square foot may be used. Slabs on Grade (Interior and Exterior) Slabs on grade should be a minimum of 4.0 inches thick and reinforced in both directions with No. 3 bars placed 18 inches on center in both directions. The slab should Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 13 be underlain by a minimum 4.0-inch sand blanket or the thickness of organic soil removed. Where moisture sensitive floors are used, a minimum 6.0-mil Visqueen or equivalent moisture barrier should be placed over the sand blanket and covered by an additional two inches of sand. Utility trenches underlying the slab may be backfilled with on-site materials, compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density. Slabs including exterior concrete flatwork should be reinforced as indicated above and provided with saw cuts/expansion joints, as recommended by the project structural engineer. All slabs should be cast over dense compacted subgrades free of ofganics. Settlement Characteristics Estimated total and differential settlement is expected to be on the order of 3/4 inch and 1/2 inch, respectively. It should also be noted that long term secondary settlement due to irrigation and loads imposed by structures is anticipated to be 1/4 inch. Seismic Considerations Although the likelihood of ground rupture on the site is remote, the property will be exposed to moderate to high levels of ground motion resulting from the release of energy should an earthquake occur along the numerous known and unknown faults in the region. Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 14 The Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone is the nearest known active fault and is considered the design earthquake for the site. A maximum probable event along the offshore segment of the Rose Canyon Fault is expected to produce a peak bedrock horizontal acceleration of 0.31g and a repeatabie ground acceleration of 0.20g. Seismic Parameters Soil Profile Type - Sc Seismic Zone - 4 Seismic Source - Type B Near Source Factor (Nv) - 1.0 Near source Acceleration Factor (NJ - 1.0 Seismic Coefficients Ca = 0.40 Na = 0.40 Cv = 0.56 Nv = 0.56 Utility Trench We recommend that all utilities be bedded in clean sand to at least one foot above the top of the conduit. The bedding should be flooded in place to fill all the voids around the conduit. Imported or on-site granular material compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction may be utilized for backfill above the bedding. The invert of subsurface utility excavations paralleling footings should be located above the zone of influence of these adjacent footings. This zone of influence is defined as the area below a 45 degree plane projected down from the nearest bottom edge of an Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 15 adjacent footing. This can be accomplished by either deepening the footing, raising the invert elevation of the utility, or moving the utility or the footing away from one another. Drainage Specific drainage patterns should be designed by the project designer. However, in general, pad water should be directed away from foundations and around the structure to the street. Roof water should be collected and conducted to hardscape or the street, via non-erodible devices. Pad water should not be allowed to pond. Vegetation adjacent to foundations should be avoided. If vegetation in these areas is desired, sealed planter boxes or drought resistant plants should be considered. Other alternatives may be available, however, the intent is to reduce moisture from migrating into foundation subsoils. Irrigation should be limited to that amount necessary to sustain plant life. All drainage systems should be inspected and cleaned annually, prior to winter rains. Geotechnical Observations Structural footing excavations should be observed by a representative of this firm, prior to the placement of steel and forms. All fill should be placed while a representative of the geotechnical engineer is present to observe and test. Plan Reviewr A copy of the final plans should be submitted to this office for review prior to the initiation of construction. Additional recommendations may be necessary at that time. Coast Geotechnlcal May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 16 LIMITATIONS This report is presented with the provision that it is the responsibility of the owner or the owner's representative to bring the information and recommendations given herein to the attention of the project's architects and/or engineers so that they may be incorporated into plans. If conditions encountered during construction appear to differ from those described in this report, our office should be notified so that we may consider whether modifications are needed. No responsibility for construction compliance with design concepts, specifications or recommendations given in this report is assumed unless on-site review is performed during the course of construction. The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure described herein are based on individual exploratory excavations made on the subject property. The subsurface conditions, excavation characteristics and geologic structure discussed should in no way be construed to reflect any variations which may occur among the exploratory excavations. Please note that fluctuations in the level of ground water may occur due to variations in rainfall, temperature and other factors not evident at the time measurements were made and reported herein. Coast Geotechnical assumes no responsibility for variations which may occur across the site. Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 17 The conclusions and recommendations of this report apply as of the current date. In time, however, changes can occur on a property whether caused by acts of man or nature on this or adjoining properties. Additionally, changes in professional standards may be brought about by legislation or the expansion of knowledge. Consequently, the conclusions and recommendations of this report may be rendered wholly or partially invalid by events beyond our control. This report is therefore subject to review and should not be relied upon after the passage of two years. The professional judgments presented herein are founded partly on our assessment of the technical data gathered, partly on our understanding of the proposed construction and partly on our general experience in the geotechnical field. Our engineering work and the judgments given meet present professional standards. However, in no respect do we guarantee the outcome of the project. Coast Geotechnical May 10, 2000 W.O. P-313040 Page 18 REFERENCES 1. Petersen, M.D., Bryant, W.A., Cramer, C.H., Cao, T., Reichle, M.S., Frankel, A.D., Lienkaemper, J.J., McCrory, P.A., and Schwartz, D.P., 1996, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California, California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology Open File Report 96-08, 59 page. 2. Hays, Walter W., 1980, Procedures for Estimating Earthquake Ground Motions, Geological Survey Professional Paper 1114, 77 pages. 3. Seed, H.B., and Idriss, I.M., 1970, A Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Soil Liquefaction Potential: Earthquake Engineering Research Center. 4. Tan, S.S., and Giffen, D.G., 1995, Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, Plate 35D, Open-File Report 95- 04, Map Scale 1:24,000. 5. Treiman, J.A., 1984, The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, A Review and Analysis, California Division of Mines and Geology. MAPS/AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS 1. Aerial Photograph, 1982, Foto-Map D-7, Scale 1"=2000'. 2. California Division of Mines and Geology, 1994, Fault Activity Map of California, Scale 1"=750,000'. 3. Geologic Map of the Oceanside, San Luis Rey and San Marcos 7.5' Quadrangles, 1996, DMG Open File Report 96-02. 4. U.S.G.S., 7.5 Minute Quadrangle Topographic Map, Digitized, Scale Variable. APPENDIX A LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE I Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content (Laboratory Standard ASTM D-1557-91) Sample Max. Dry Optimum Location Density (pcf) Optimum Content T-l @ 1.5'-3.5' 127.8 '. 10.2 TABLE II Field Dry Density and Moisture Content Sample Field Dry Field Moisture Location ' Density Content (pcf) % B-l @ 1.2' 105.4 8.2 B-l @ 2.0' 117.9 .18.0 B-l @ 3.0' . 105.8 : 16.2 B-l @ 5.0' : Sample Disturbed 17. 0 ;. B-l @ 8.0' Sample Disturbed 11.6 T-l @ 1.25' 128.5 12.0 T-l @ 3.0' Sample Disturbed 20.0 P-312020 LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING NO. 1 DRILL RIG: PORTABLE BUCKET AUGER PROJECT NO. P-3 13040 BORING DIAMETER: 3.5" DATE DRILLED: 04-27-00 SURFACE ELEV.: 220' LOGGED BY: MB oH. >* c75jz; § p2Q 105.4 117.9 105.8 e£s oo3 p 11 8.2 18.0 16.2 17.0 11.6 w < wos BCO GO Q wh-I 1VI WC/J 1PQ •O H I S2 ^>^ Q O • 3 Li 1 •1 § g > Js. E &a 220.00 0.00 = 219.00 1.00 218.00 2.00 217.00 3.00 — — 216.00 — 4.00 EE — 215.00 5.00 214.00 6.00 213.00 7.00 — 212.00 8.00 8hjo Sso III j||: i?:i::::j; iigfJlJ: illii pi^IS 1, ,,!»*.. tHHIBHIlmm.'•fff^fffjf. SillW$iti;\ BB jisIII •"•!!•"*•"• ™™'X':<«:V>>:A>:mm. COOCOB co' <! Oy GO SM SM DESCRIPTION SOIL (Qs): Brown silty sand, v. moist, loose, numerous roots TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Reddish bin., fine and med.-grained sand, slightly clayey From 4'to5', Grey clayey sand lens END OF BORING @ 8.5' SHEET 1 OF 1 COAST GEOTECHNICAL LOG OF TEST PIT NO. 1 DRY DENSITY (pcf)128.5 g o0 £3Q . 12.0 20.0 w ® | 8^-* ^-» x>fe13 .I1 14*-* ^0 !Z SAMPLEi i K DEPTH / ELEVATIONi0.00 219.00 _ 1.00 218.00 _ 2.00 217.00 3.00 O III 1 SOIL CLASS. (USCS)SM SM PROJECT NO. DATE EXCAVATED: SURFACE ELEV.: LOGGED BY: DESCRIPTION SOIL (Qs): Brown silty sand, v. moist, loose, slightly clayey NOTE: Pit Extended from 2' by 3.5" Boring @ 3', Wet conditions along Contact TERRACE DEPOSITS (Qt): Reddish brn., fine and med.-grained sand, slightly clayey TEST PIT SKETCH .f EXIST. STEM WALL FTG. jf RAISED WOOD FLOOR , ?_ —? j • . i 1 !L . . /•- . ^ ^ \ \ •were i 01 COAST GEOTECHNICAL 8 H 70w n§s*sffz APPENDIX B - - -' *x•'.. DATE: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 ************************************* * * * EQFAULT * * * * Ver. 2.20 * * * * * ************************************* (Estimation of Peak Horizontal Acceleration From Digitized California Faults) SEARCH PERFORMED FOR: ALLEN JOB NUMBER: P-313040 JOB NAME: P-313040 SITE COORDINATES: LATITUDE: 33.1618 N LONGITUDE: 117.3262 W SEARCH RADIUS: 60 mi ATTENUATION RELATION: 2) Campbell & Bozorgnia (1994) Horiz. - Soft Rock UNCERTAINTY (M=Mean, S=Mean+l-Sigma): S SCOND: 0 COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT-DATA FILE USED: CDMGSCE.DAT SOURCE OF DEPTH VALUES (A=Attenuation File, F=Fault Data File): A DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS Page ABBREVIATED FAULT NAME SAN JACINTO-COYOTE CREEK SAN JACINTO-ANZA SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VA SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO ELSINORE-COYOTE MOUNTAIN ELS INORE- JULIAN ELSINORE-TEMECULA ELS INORE -GLEN IVY WHITTIER CHINO-CENTRAL AVE. (Elsino EARTHQUAKE VALLEY CORONADO BANK NEWPORT- INGLEWOOD (Offshor ROSE CANYON NEWPORT- INGLEWOOD (L.A.Bas PALOS VERDES COMPTON THRUST ELYS I AN PARK THRUST ADDPOY DISTANCE mi (km) 52 ( 83) 46 ( 74) 46 ( 75) 59 ( 95) 58 ( 93) 23 ( 38) 23 ( 37) 33 ( 53) 51 ( 82) 48 ( 77) 43 ( 69) 22 ( 35) 6 ( 10) 6(9) 46 ( 74) 36 ( 59) 56 ( 90) 58 ( 94) MAX. C MAX. CRED. MAG. 6.80 7.20 6.90 6.70 6.80 7.10 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.70 6.50 7.40 6.90 6.90 6.90 7.10 6.80 6.70 :REDIBLI PEAK SITE ACC. g 0.049 0.083 0.063 0.037 0.042 0.180 0.148 0.093 0.050 0.050 0.049 0.236 0.574 0.590 0.063 0.106 0.064 0.055 ] EVENT SITE INTENS MM VI VII VI V VI VIII VIII VII VI VI VI IX X X VI VII VI VI MAX. I MAX. PROB. MAG. 6.20 6.90 6.80 6.70 6.20 6.40 6.30 6.30 5.90 5.50 5.70 6.30 5.80 5.70 5.60 6.20 5.80 5.80 >ROBABLI PEAK SITE ACC. g 0.029 0.064 0.058 0.037 0.024 0.109 0.101 0.060 0.022 0.019 0.024 0.109 0.307 0.294 0.020 0.048 0.029 0.027 5 EVENT SITE INTENS MM V VI VI V V VII VII VI IV IV IV VII IX IX IV VI V V -END OF SEARCH- 18 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS, THE ROSE CANYON FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 5.7 MILES AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM-CREDIBLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.590 g LARGEST MAXIMUM-PROBABLE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.307 g APPENDIX C GRADING GUIDELINES Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of the governing agencies, Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code, the geotechnical report and the guidelines presented below. All of the guidelines may not apply to a specific site and additional recommendations may be .necessary during the grading phase. Site Clearing Trees, dense vegetation, and other deleterious materials should be removed from the site. Non-organic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas under direction of the Soils engineer. Subdrainaae 1. During grading, the Geologist and Soils Engineer should evaluate the necessity of placing additional drains (see Plate A). . 2. All subdrainage systems should be observed by the Geologist and Soils Engineer during construction and prior to covering with compacted fill. 3. Consideration should be given to having subdrains located by the project surveyors. Outlets should be located and protected. Treatment of Existing Ground 1. All heavy vegetation, rubbish and other deleterious materials should be disposed of off site. 2. All surficial deposits including alluvium and colluvium should be removed unless otherwise indicated in the text of this report. Groundwater existing in the alluvial areas may make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text of the report may be necessary due to saturation during winter months. 3. Subsequent to removals, the natural ground should be processed to a depth of six inches, moistened to near optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill standards. Fill Placement 1. Most site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some special processing or handling may be required (see report). Highly organic or contaminated soil should not be used for compacted fill. (1) 2. Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, moisture conditioned, processed, and compacted in thin lifts not to exceed six inches in thickness to obtain a uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and compacted on a horizontal plane, unless otherwise found acceptable by the Soils Engineer. 3. If the moisture content or relative density varies from that acceptable to the Soils engineer, the Contractor should rework the fill until it is in accordance with the following: a) Moisture content of the fill should be at or above optimum moisture. Moisture should be evenly distributed without wet and dry pockets. Pre- watering of cut or removal areas should be considered in addition to watering during fill placement, particularly in clay or dry surficial soils. b) Each six inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density in compliance with the testing method specified by the controlling governmental agency. In this case, the testing method is ASTM Test Designation D-1557-91. 4. Side-hill fills should have a minimum equipment-width key at their toe excavated through all surficial soil and into competent material (see report) and tilted back into the hill (Plate A). As the fill is elevated, it should be benched through surficial deposits and into competent bedrock or other material deemed suitable by the Soils Engineer. 5. Rock fragments less than six inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill, provided: a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets; b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine-grained material to surround the rocks;' c) The distribution of the rocks is supervised by the Soils Engineer. 6. Rocks greater than six inches in diameter should be taken off site, or placed in accordance with the recommendations of the Soils Engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. 7. In clay soil large chunks or blocks are common; if in excess of six (6) inches minimum dimension then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot compactors or other suitable methods should be used to break the up blocks. (2) 8. The Contractor should be required to obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes. This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment. If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods then the slope construction should be performed so that a constant gradient is maintained throughout construction. Soil should not be "spilled" over the slope face nor should slopes be "pushed out" to obtain grades. Compaction equipment should compact each lift along the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back rolled approximately every 4 feet vertically as the slope is built. Density tests should be taken periodically during grading on the flat surface of the fill three to five feet horizontally from the face of the slope. In addition, if a method other than over building and cutting back to the compacted core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction should include testing the outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to determine if the required compaction is being achieved. Finish grade testing of the slope should be performed after construction is complete. Each day the Contractor should receive a copy of the Soils Engineer's "Daily Field Engineering Report" which would indicate the results of field density tests that day. 9. Fill over cut slopes should be constructed in the following manner: a) All surficial soils and weathered rock materials should be removed at the cut-fill interface. b) A key at least 1 equipment width wide (see report) and tipped at least 1 foot into slope should be excavated into competent materials and observed by the Soils Engineer or his representative. c) The cut portion of the slope should be constructed prior to fill placement to evaluate if stabilization is necessary, the contractor should be responsible for any additional earthwork created by placing fill prior to cut excavation. 10. Transition lots (cut and fill) and lots above stabilization fills should be capped with a four foot thick compacted fill blanket (or as indicated in the report). 11. Cut pads should be observed by the Geologist to evaluate the need for overexcavation and replacement with fill. This may be necessary to reduce water infiltration into highly fractured bedrock or other permeable zones,and/or due to differing expansive potential of materials beneath a structure. The overexcavation should be at least three feet. Deeper overexcavation may be recommended in some cases. (3). 12. Exploratory backhoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located. Grading Observation and Testing 1. Observation of the fill placement should be provided by the Soils Engineer during the progress of grading. 2. In general, density tests would be made at intervals not exceeding two feet of fill height or every 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary depending on soil conditions and the size of the fill. In any event, an adequate number of field density tests should be made to evaluate if the required compaction and moisture content is generally being obtained. 3. Density tests may be made on the surface material to receive fill, as required by the Soils Engineer. 4. Cleanouts, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations,subdrains and rock disposal should be observed by the Soils Engineer prior to placing any fill. It will be the Contractor's responsibility to notify the Soils Engineer when such areas are ready for observation. 5. A Geologist should observe subdrain construction. 6. A Geologist should observe benching prior to and during placement of fill. Utility Trench Backfill Utility trench backfill should be placed to the following standards: 1. Ninety percent of the laboratory standard if native material is used as backfill. 2. As an alternative, clean sand may be utilized and flooded into place. No specific relative compaction would be required; however, observation, probing, and if deemed necessary, testing may be required. 3. Exterior trenches, paralleling a footing and extending below a 1:1 plane projected from the outside bottom edge of the footing, should be compacted to 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Sand backfill, unless it is similar to the inplace fill, should not be allowed in these trench backfill areas. Density testing along with probing should be accomplished to verify the desired results. (4) ..K CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE (Parti of 2) ENV-1 PROJECT NAME _ . PROJECT ADDRESS . . .. , PRINCIPAL DESIGNER-ENVELOPE DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR T GENERAL INFORMATION DATE OF PLANS TELEPHONE 1 (*o 7 2. ^ - 3 'if 6»5" TELEPHONE iu.o H5«f- 3^<o DATE ^>l1o loo Building Permit # Checked by/Date Enforcement Agency Use ^PLOS -ufgr^wc BUILDING CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA \~1_(&>O W^C 4P-IMATEZONE "7 BUILDING TYPE fit NONRESIDENTIAL PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION D NEW CONSTRUCTION METHOD OF ENVELOPE H COMPONENT COMPLIANCE D HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL D HOTEL/MOTEL GUEST ROOM ^ADDITION D ALTERATION D UNCONDITIONED (file affidavit) D OVERALL ENVELOPE D PERFORMANCE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE This Certificate of compliance lists the building features and performance specifications need to comply with Title 24, Parts 1 and 6 of the California Code of Regulations. This certificate applies only to building envelope requirements. The documentation preparer hereby certifies that the documentation is accurate and complete. DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR DATE The Principal Envelope Designer hereby certifies that the proposed building design represented in this set of constructic documents is consistent with the other compliance forms and worksheets, with the specifications, and with any §the calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the enveft requirements contained in sections 110, 116 through 118, and 140, 142, 143 or 149 of Title 24, Part 6. Please check one: D I hereby affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am licensed in the State of California as a civil engineer or mechanical engineer, or I am a licensed architect. , I affirm that I am eligible under the provisions of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code by section 5537.2 or 6737.3 to sign this document as the person responsible for its preparation; and that I am a licensed contractor performing this work. " . D I affirm that I am eligible under Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to sign this document because it pertains to a structure or type of work described as exempt pursuant to Business and Professions Code Sections 5537, 5538 and 6737.1. . . . • - . (These sections of the Business and Professions Xjode are printed in full in the Nonresidential Manual.) PRINCIPAL ENVELOPE DESIGNER-NAME I SIGNAJUft? //. A " ~ I DATEj '/ | LIC. # ENVELOPE MANDATORY MEASURES Indicate location on plans of Note Block for Mandatory-Measures INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT For Detailed instructions on the use of this and all Energy Efficiency Standards compliance forms, please refer to the Nonresidential Manual published by the California Energy Commission. ENV-1: Required on plans for all submittals. Part 2 may be incorporated in schedules on plans. ENV-2: Used for all submittals; choose appropriate version depending on method of envelope compliance. ENV-3: Optional. Use if default U-values are not used. Choose appropriate version for assembly U-valueto be calculated. Nonresidential Compliance Form November 1998 SD COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND P.O. BOX 807, SAN FRANCISCO.CA 94101-0807 CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE ISSUE DATE: 01-01-01 POLICY NUMBER: 046-01 UNIT OO08775 CERTIFICATE EXPIRES: 01-O1-02 CITY OF CARLSBAD ATTN: BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD CA 92009-^859 JOB: ALL OPERATIONS This is to certify that we have issued a valid Workers' Compensation insurance policy in a form approved by the California Insurance Commissioner to the employer named below for the policy period indicated. This pplicy:is hot-subject to cancellation by the Fund except upon 30 days' advance written notice, to the employer. We will also give you 30 days' advance notice should this policy be cancelled prior to its normal"; expiration. .... ' 9 - ' . ' . . ' ' . . . . ' ' -•'..•/' This certificate of: insurance is not an insurance policy and does not,amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed herein. Notwithstanding any requirement, term, or condition of any ^contract or other document With reSpect to which this certificate of insurance may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the! • policies described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such policies; PRESIDENT ' EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY LIMIT INCLUDING DEFENSE COSTS: $1,000,000.OO PER OCCURRENCE. ENDORSEMENT #2065 ENTITLED CERTIFICATE HOLDERS' NOTICE EFFECTIVE O1/01/01 IS ATTACHED TO AND FORMS A PART OF THIS POLICY. EMPLOYER LEGAL NAME B.A. WORTHING INC. PO BOX ]0k] CARLSBAD CA 92018 B.A. WORTHING, INC. PRINTED: 12-16-00 P0409 THIS DOCUMENT HAS A BLUE PATTERNED BACKGROUND SCIF 10265 (REV. 2-95) City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner(s) Name(s)) Project Description: Building Type: Residential -530--^ dTZ- Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU Res. Additions: Comerc./ Ind.: City Certification of Applicant's information: Net Square Feet New Area \/\SCHOrHOOL PtSTRICTS W»TH>N CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. sbad CA 92009 (729-929 San Marcos Unified School District 215 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069^736-2200) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Ranch Santa Fe Rd Encinitas. CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas. CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant /Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/ developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature:Date: 2O75 Las Palma^Qr?' Carlsbad, CA 92009-1576 • (760) 438-1161 • FAX (760) 438-0894 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) ****************************************************************** THIS FORM INDICATES THATTHE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or. owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL *r TITLE ' Gaylert Freeman Assistant Superintending . ...,-.., ^^ n;ctrirtBusiness Sarafifift Carlsbad uiiniej *.»— ^NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT OTWWW4<W 801 Pine A'/enue , .\jansuau, .DATE PHONE NUMBER 760-42% 1 &/• y.