Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1652 CHESTNUT AVE; ; CB030699; Permit
05-27-20Q3 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: Applicant: ILA SCHMIDT City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB030699 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 1652 CHESTNUT AV CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: 2DU Lot #: 0 $55,040.00 Construction Type: NEW Reference #: 1 Structure Type: SFD 1 Bathrooms: 1 SCHMIDT RES 640 2 ND DWELLING UNIT Owner: Status: Applied: Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check*: ISSUED 03/07/2003 SB 05/27/2003 05/27/2003 5944 05/27/03 0002 01 COP 3145- 1650 CHESTNUT AV 92008 729-7402 Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFM Fee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $377.16 $0.00 $245.15 $0.00 $0.00 $5.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Meter Size Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF PFF (CFD Fund) License Tax License Tax (CFD Fund) Traffic Impact Fee Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) Sidewalk Fee PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Housing Impact Fee Housing InLieu Fee Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $270.72 $305.28 $0.00 $83.00 $20.00 $24.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,060.00 $0.00 $3,390.81 Total Fees: $3,390.81 Total Payments To Date:$245. 1 5 Due:$3,145.66 -JLlN STORAGE ATTACHED Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date:Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE thatfepproval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as tees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. PESIVHT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 1. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO.^ff*? ° EST. VAL. ? ? Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date ^' — 03/07/03 0002 01—82 COP 245.15 Address (include Bldg/Suite #)Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Unit No.Phase No.Total # of units Assessor's Parcel #Existing Use Proposed Usere. 6 Description of Work SQ.FT. 2. CONTACT PERSON (if different from applicant) #of Storiesa # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms Name Address 3. APPLICANT Q Contractor O Agent for Contractor ' City ^Owner D Agent for Owner State/Zip Telephone #Fax tt Name 4. PROPERTY OWNER Address State/Zip Telephone #-73ft 7^0 2—• Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # S. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name State License # Designer Name State License tt Address License Class Address City State/Zip City Business License # City State/Zip Telephone # Telephone 'COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: O I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) PI CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION 1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale 4, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). n I. as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). l~1 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvementyOS(ES l~lNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): ~ 5. I will provide some of the work, but ly^ave contracted (hjred) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work):_ PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RES/DEfJTtALfBU\LD\NG PERMITS ONLY Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? i~1 YES l~l NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? l~| YES l~l NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? O YES f~| NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE. INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued/By the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become niJll and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not corjirtie/lced wjjfc»m-180 days from tN» date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is/suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commefpdyfpr a^geriod of 7 80 days (Efpcjjpn 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). 'APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance City of Carlsbad Final Building Inspection Dept: Building Engineering Planning CMWD St Lite Fire RECEIVED' E JAN 2 7 2005 CITY OF CARLSBADNG IN EE RING DEP A RTM ENTCM&l IMVISIGN Plan Check #: Permit #: CB030699 Project Name: SCHMIDT RES 640 2 ND DWELLING UNIT Address: 1652 CHESTNUT AV Contact Person: ISLA. SCHMIDT Phone: 7607297402 Sewer Dist: Water Dist: Lot: Date: 01/27/2005 Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: 2DU 0 Inspected By: £>J> Inspected By: Inspected By: Comments: Date Inspected: Date Inspected: Date Inspected: £7-2.- "rJrApproved: ^- Approved: Approved: -"^ Disapproved: Disapproved: Disapproved: City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 04/12/2005 Permit* CB030699 Title: SCHMIDT RES 640 2 ND DWELLING Description: UNIT Type:RESDNTL Sub Type: 2DU Job Address: 1652 CHESTNUT AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT ILA SCHMIDT Owner: Remarks: Inspector Assignment: PY Phone: Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: ILA SCHMIDT Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date 03/21/2005 01/27/2005 05/20/2004 04/22/2004 04/22/2004 04/22/2004 01/13/2004 01/13/2004 12/31/2003 12/23/2003 12/23/2003 12/15/2003 12/15/2003 10/23/2003 10/15/2003 09/29/2003 Description 33 89 31 21 22 23 17 18 16 14 34 14 24 13 13 11 Service Change/Upgrade Final Combo Underground/Conduit-Wiring Underground/Under Floor Sewer/Water Service Gas/Test/Repairs Interior Lath/Drywall Exterior Lath/Drywall Insulation Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Ftg/Foundation/Piers Act AP CO AP we AP AP AP AP AP AP AP CO AP AP CO AP Insp PY PY PY PY PY PY JM JM PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY Comments EMR SEE NOTICE ATTACHED GARAGE SLAB & STAIR FTG City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 03/21/2005 Permit* CB030699 Title: SCHMIDT RES 640 2 ND DWELLING Description: UNIT Inspector Assignment: PY Sub Type: 2DU 1652 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT ILA SCHMIDT Owner: Remarks: AROUND NOON/SDGE @ 2PM Phone: Inspector: Total Time:Requested By: IDA SCHMIDT Entered By: KAREN CD Description 33 Service Change/Upgrade Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date 01/27/2005 05/20/2004 04/22/2004 04/22/2004 04/22/2004 01/13/2004 01/13/2004 12/31/2003 12/23/2003 12/23/2003 12/15/2003 12/15/2003 10/23/2003 10/15/2003 09/29/2003 09/23/2003 09/23/2003 06/26/2003 06/26/2003 06/24/2003 06/24/2003 06/19/2003 Description 89 31 21 22 23 17 18 16 14 34 14 24 13 13 11 13 15 11 12 11 12 21 Final Combo Underground/Conduit-Wiring Underground/Under Floor Sewer/Water Service Gas/Test/Repairs Interior Lath/Drywall Exterior Lath/Drywall Insulation Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Ftg/Foundation/Piers Shear Panels/HD's Roof/Reroof Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Ftg/Foundation/Piers Steel/Bond Beam Underground/Under Floor Act CO AP we AP AP AP AP AP AP AP CO AP AP CO AP CO AP PA PA NR we PA Insp PY PY PY PY PY JM JM PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY JE JE JE JE JE Comments SEE NOTICE ATTACHED GARAGE SLAB & STAIR FTG OK 1ST POUR - LETTER FOR 2 POUR ATTACHED OK 1ST POUR NEED TO COMPLETE WORK LAUNDRY ROOM TO CLEANOUT ONLY CITY OF CARLSBAD ELECTRIC AND GAS METER CLEARANCE INTER-DEPARTMENT ADDRESS: Vf S.E.O. Service Equipment Only YES NO Reason, If Denied: r/^ ELECTRIC METER: COMMERCIAL RESIDENCE NEW SERVICE YES RELOCATE NO T.S.P.B. TEMP. P/P UP-GRADE TEST METER IRR. PEDESTAL GAS METER: COMMERCIAL YES RESIDENCE NO EST METER Buildf/g Injector Signature / Date Time CtC? Called In By Date Time Called m To City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 01/27/2005 Permit* CB030699 Title: SCHMIDT RES 640 2 ND DWELLING Description: UNIT Type:RESDNTL Sub Type: 2DU Job Address: 1652 CHESTNUT AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT ILA SCHMIDT Owner: Remarks: Total Time: Inspector Assignment: PY Phone: 7607297402 Inspector: CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Requested By: ISLA SCHMIDT Entered By: CHRISTINE Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date 05/20/2004 04/22/2004 04/22/2004 04/22/2004 01/13/2004 01/13/2004 12/31/2003 12/23/2003 12/23/2003 12/15/2003 12/15/2003 10/23/2003 10/15/2003 09/29/2003 09/23/2003 09/23/2003 Description 31 21 22 23 17 18 16 14 34 14 24 13 13 11 13 15 Underground/Conduit-Wiring Underground/Under Floor Sewer/Water Service Gas/Test/Repairs Interior Lath/Drywall Exterior Lath/Drywall Insulation Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough Electric Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding Rough/Topout Shear Panels/HD's Shear Panels/HD's Ftg/Foundation/Piers Shear Panels/HD's Roof/Reroof Act AP we AP AP AP AP AP AP AP CO AP AP CO AP CO AP Insp PY PY PY PY JM JM PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY PY Comments GARAGE SLAB & STAIR FTG CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE NOTICE LOCATION PERMIT NO. (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE TIME /t— A . FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FATHER INFORMATION, CONTACT ^ YES BUILDING INSPECTOR PHONE CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 12/15/2003 Permit* CB030699 Title: SCHMIDT RES 640 2 ND DWELLING Description: UNIT Inspector Assignment: PY Type:RESDNTL Sub Type: 2DU Job Address: 1652 CHESTNUT AV Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT ILA SCHMIDT Owner: Remarks: NEED BETTER INFO ON INSP REQUEST Phone: Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding £d Requested By: ILA SCHMIDT Entered By: KAREN Act Comment Associated PCRs/CVs Date 10/23/2003 10/15/2003 09/29/2003 09/23/2003 09/23/2003 •t 06/26/2003 06/26/2003 06/24/2003 06/24/2003 06/19/2003 06/19/2003 Inspection History Description 13 Shear Panels/HD's 13 Shear Panels/HD's 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 13 Shear Panels/HD's 15 Roof/Reroof 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 12 Steel/Bond Beam 1 1 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 12 Steel/Bond Beam 21 Underground/Under Floor 22 Sewer/Water Service Act AP CO AP CO AP PA PA NR we PA we Insp PY PY 'PY PY PY JE JE JE JE JE JE Comments GARAGE SLAB & STAIR FTG OK 1ST POUR - LETTER FOR 2 POUR ATTACHED OK 1ST POUR NEED TO COMPLETE WORK LAUNDRY ROOM TO CLEANOUT ONLY CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE LOCATION NOTICE PERMIT NO. (760) 602-2700 1635 FARADAY AVENUE TIME .-'( j**W0'"1 ^ "j h '- FOR INSPECTION CALL (760) 602-2725. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? FOR FURTMER INFORMATION, CONTACT YES „A i > , \ \ I //l/i^M ^ PHONE V'^jfifDrNG INSP|CTOFT CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER (to to ~ Qity of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 06/25/2003 Permit* CB030699 Title: SCHMIDT RES 640 2 ND DWELLING Description: UNIT Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT ILA SCHMIDT Owner: Remarks: Total Time: Sub Type: 2DU 1652 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Inspector Assignment: JE Phone: 6192479817 Inspector: Requested By: ILA Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 12 Steel/Bond Beam Act Comment Qk O.JL ffr Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 06/19/2003 21 Underground/Under Floor PA JE LAUNDRY ROOM TO CLEANOUT ONLY 06/19/2003 22 Sewer/Water Service WC JE r. —-r~"" t A •'X' ^ , -ft? 1 TIIi S A r ^ AV ni n N J. MICHAEL WINFIELD AIA ARCHITECT P.O. BOX 246S CS5BD 4B1-65OO CARLSBAD, CA S2O1 B C76O) 433-43OO June24,2003r ' "-i ' ). r ' i •* ! . s , ; .' ; City .of Carlsbad -< , ( , ; ~ Building Dept. Field Inspection , -1635 Faraday Ave.""- -' - Carlsbad, CA92008 • '^ ,„ *„ v~ii*,v- -RE:t Schmidt SDUJ J -' '" ;", ~4 1652ChestnutAve.iCarlsbad 1 s Building Permit # CP030699; -^ ! L 2^Pour Foundation Approval T Tq Whom It May Concern s to deepiened footings a 2-pour method ma^be. used; ^.A"ft3|(dowei at24"bncenter - with a 24" horizontal leg (tied to fattffe sh^ ! , i_ into the footing. _ _ - . . .''_'_ _''_"'_ . . . "*_ 'j . ". ^Architura1 r , i J ! i ' i - T r i t + City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 06/24/2003 Permit* CB030699 Title: SCHMIDT RES 640 2 ND DWELLING Description: UNIT Inspector Assignment: JE Type: RESDNTL Job Address: Suite: Location: APPLICANT ILA SCHMIDT Owner: Remarks: Sub Type: 2DU 1652 CHESTNUT AV Lot 0 Phone: 0000000000 Inspector: Total Time: CD Description 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 12 Steel/Bond Beam Act Comment Requested By: N/A Entered By: ROBIN Associated PCRs/CVs Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 06/19/2003 21 Underground/Under Floor PA JE LAUNDRY ROOM TO CLEANOUT ONLY 06/19/2003 22 Sewer/Water Service WC JE ' .ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY P.O.BOX 1932 • EL CAJON, CA 92022-1932 Tel:(619)447-4747 To-- C1^ o - \\05t. Wit DAILY MEMO fab \ \ Carl Schmidt Inspection Services, Inc. P.O. Box 178403 San Diego, CA 92177-8403 (619)855-9252 SPECIAL INSPECTION REPORT Project: -J < Address: City: Permit Number:8 £>3 & & Plan File Number: TYPE OF OBSERVATIONS: Reinforcing Steel _ Reinforced Concrete V^ Structural Masonry _ Field Welding Epoxy _ Prestressed Concrete _ Shop Welding _ Bolting __ Fireproofing Number of Samples:Type: C — 6 C r -£ f~-€~ Materials/DesignMix/Psi : Date. REPORT .*?r/ ' a WORK INSPECTED CONFORMS WITH APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TIME IN. 7/^^ TIME OUT: Inspector (Print)Certification # Inspector's Signature General Contractor Address: City. ^_ : _/, ^-<a Authorized Job Site Contact Signature Phone: EsGii Corporation In Partnership with government for Quitting Safety DATE: April 29, 2003 a A£P_yr;ANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: O3-O699 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 1652 Chestnut Ave. PROJECT NAME: SFD Add. for Ha Schmidt I | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. XI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: [XI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Telephone #: Date contacted: (by: ) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person X —. ^"^ If^REMARKS: V^. Applicant shall provide a/Special Inspection Program" to the Building official. B. All sheets of o^ifep^S^npg the seal and signature of the architect/engineer. By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 4/24 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 4 (858)560-1468 + Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership witfi government for <BuiCding Safety DATE. April 11,2003 ' JURIS.; JURISDICTION: Carlsbad S~PIANREVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0699 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1652 Chestnut Ave. PROJECT NAME: SFD Add. for Ila Schmidt j The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. 2<] The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. XI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Ila Schmidt 1650 Chestnut Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Ila Schmidt (x• M.) Telephone #: (760) 729-7402 Date contacted: y \\ i loj> (by: |e—) Fax #: Mail —"Telephone^ Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 4/7 trnsmtLdot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 * Fax (858) 560-1576 .Carlsbad 03-0699 April 11,2003 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1652 Chestnut Ave. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 4/7 REVIEWED BY: Sergio Azuela PLAN CHECK NO.: O3-0699 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: April 11, 2003 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. B. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. C. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? UYes QNo Carlsbad 03-O699 April 11, 2O03 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 9. From the soils report provided: • The foundation plan does not comply with the soils report recommendations for this project. Please review the report and modify design, notes and details as required to show compliance: o Slab on grade thickness shall be 4" instead of 3 Yz". o The concrete in contact with the natural ground shall have a Water/Cement ratio of 0.5 and an F'c = 4,000 psi (according to moderate sulfate resistance required on Table 19-A-4). Special Inspection is required. • The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: o The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, o The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and o The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." • Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report - page 12). 24. New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). • No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. Carlsbad 03-0699 April 11, 2003 25. Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). • No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. 26. All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy). • No response was provided for this correction. Original correction is still applicable. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In (Partners/Up witfc government for (Buifding Safety DATE: March 21, 2003 OAPPtJCANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0699 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 16^Chestnut Ave. PROJECT NAME: SFD Add. for Ila Schmidt I | The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted fora complete recheck. 2SI The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. I The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. 3 The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Ila Schmidt 1650 Chestnut Ave, Carlsbad, CA 92008 ] Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. XI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Ila Schmidt (\. K) Telephone #: (760) 729-7402 Date contacted: 3 iz/ /oj (by: K. ) Fax #: Mail ^ Telephone ^ Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Sergio Azuela Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB D EJ D PC 3/11 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 4 Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 03-0699 March 21, 2003 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 03-0699 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1650 Chestnut Ave. FLOOR AREA: Dwelling Add. 640 SF STORIES: 2 Garage Add. 592 SF Deck Add. 96 SF HEIGHT: 21 FT REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 3/7 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: March 21, 2O03 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 3/11 PLAN REVIEWER: Sergio Azuela FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked UP list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad O3-0699 March 21, 2003 • PLANS 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the 1997 UBC, 2000 UMC, 2000 UPC and the 1999 NEC. • FIRE PROTECTION 3. Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup: a) Inside each bedroom. b) Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms. • NOTE: Detectors shall sound an alarm audible in all sleeping areas of the unit. Section 310.9.1. • GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 4. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface. • Kitchen windows adjacent to stairway. • ROOFING 5. Balconies and decks exposed to the weather and sealed underneath shall be sloped a minimum of % inch per foot for drainage. Section 1402.3. 6. Show deck drains and overflows. Sections 1506.2 and 1506.3. Carlsbad 03-0699 March 21, 2003 • EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 7. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): a) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. b) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. • GARAGE AND CARPORTS 8. Provide an 18" raised platform for any FAD, water heater, or other device in the garage which may generate a flame or spark. UMC Section 303.1.3, UPC Section 510.1. a) Please specify 18" high to the Water Heater Platform. . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 9. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. a) The City of Carlsbad Special Code Requirements for soils report are as follows: i) All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. If a room addition is less than 1000 sq. ft. in area and only one story, then a soils report is not required. 10. Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes ("distance-to- daylight") and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Chapter 18. 11. Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern. Section 1804.7. • FRAMING 12. Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"x30", unless the maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30". Access must be provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other readily accessible location and 30" headroom clearance is required above the opening. Section 1505.1. Carlsbad O3-O699 March 21, 20O3 • ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 13. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. 14. Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art. 210-52(a). 15. Per NEC Art. 210-11(c)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either: a) A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or b) At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets. 16. All bedroom branch circuits now require arc fault protection. Note clearly on the plans that "Bedroom branch circuits will be arc fault circuit protected." NEC Art. 210-12(b). 17. Show on the plan that ground-fault circuit-interrupter protection complies with NEC Art. 210-8, which reads as follows: All 125-volt, single-phase, 15- and 20- ampere receptacles installed in garages, outdoors and kitchen counters. • PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) 18. Show T and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 608.5. 19. In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank). UPC, Section 510.5 • ENERGY CONSERVATION 20. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms (containing a tub or shower). 21. Note on the plans: "The manufactured windows shall have a label attached certified by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) and showing compliance with the energy calculations." CARLSBAD SPECIAL CODE REQUIREMENTS 22. The UFER ground may only be a copper conductor for commercial and industrial electrodes. Rebar is allowed for residential use only up to 200 amperes. Carlsbad O3-0699 March 21, 2O03 23. Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc.) may not be driven parallel to the flanges of TJI's (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written approval from Trus-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges. a) Revise detail 7/3. 24. New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note "two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). 25. Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093). 26. All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy). To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes Q No Q The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Sergio Azuela at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad O3-0699 March 21,2003 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Sergio Azuela BUILDING ADDRESS: 1650 Chestnut Ave. BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 & U-l PLAN CHECK NO.: O3-0699 DATE: March 21, 2003 SFD/Garage Add. Ila Schmidt TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION Dwelling Add. Garage Add. Deck Add. Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 640 592 96 640 cb Valuation Multiplier 98.00 27.60 14.40 3.60 By Ordinance Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) 62,720 16,339 1,382 2,304 82,746 1994 UBC Building Permit Fee 1994 UBC Plan Check Fee Type of Review: D Repetitive Feei/^vj Repeats Comments: Complete Review D Other Hourly Esgil Plan Review Fee Structural Only Hour' $472.11 $306.87 $264.38 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc DATE: BUILDING XPDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB& \ SDO EST. VALUE: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based oh plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please see\ thax attached report of deficiencies marked withJHTMake necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. / L^ Date: Date: / FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: , , Date: ation Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 H:\WORD\DOCSXCHKLST\Buikling Planchedt Cklsl Form (Generic).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST •>ND D SITE PLAN Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Driveway widths Existing or proposed sewer lateral Existing or proposed water service Existing or proposed irrigation service North Arrow Existing & Proposed Structures Existing Street Improvements Property Lines E. Easements Show on site plan: Drainage Patterns 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." B. Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service.Tioweveri second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. 3. Include on title sheet: A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. 7 EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Buildlng Plancheck Cktst Form (Generic).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE Q 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. 50 U 0/51 rtrt n. ^ /T /--3 D D D 4b-A" conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS D D 5- Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 V* x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS CH D O 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $75.000. pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:WORD\DOCS\CHKLSTBuiklina Plancheck Cklsl Form (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-OOl.doc o Rev. 12/26/96 , ST BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: D D D 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $310 so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. • ':.t ' * Future public improvements required as follows: . EH 6c.-Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: D D 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. CH O D 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). D D D 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. * Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: D D D 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) H:\WOFWDOCS\CHKLS-nBuilding Plancheck Cklsl Form (Generic 7-14-00).doc 4 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST. 7d .No Grading Permit required. D G D 7e- If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS D 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: D D 9- INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: D 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. Q n 11- Or Required fees are attached Ql No fees required WATER METER REVIEW D 12a- Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Buikling Plancheck Cklst Form (Generic).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD D 12b. « If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand, (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 2. 3. 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLS'nBuilding Planctreck Cklsl Form (Generic).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ST 2ND 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. E3 O 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts, a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. n CH 13- Additional Comments: H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Bullding Plandleck CWst Form (Genafc).doc D .^Es ^£ Ca ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET timate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: Prepared bv:UU Bldg. Permit No. C52> 6 Date:Checked by:Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: £>\) L) Sq. Ft./Units: Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: SO O Sq. Ft./Units: Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units:. FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) ages for all uses. EDU's: / : EDU's: ges for all uses. • , ADT's: & : ADT's: . PARK-IN-LIEU FEE FEE/UNIT: PARK AREA & #:. X NO. UNITS:=$. 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADTs/UNITS:X FEE/ADT: . BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 ADTs/UNITS: . FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE UNIT/SQ.FT.: 5. SEWER FEE EDU's: FIT AREA:. EDU's: X FEE/ADT: ZONE: X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: DIST. #3. =$_ X FEE/EDU:^ FEE/EDU: 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) D 7. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA : ACRES: X . POTABLE WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE HIGH. FEE/AC: /LOW =$_ =$_ =$_ =$_ =$_ METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION 1 of 2 F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.doc Rev. 7/14/00 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D 9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $ *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. 2 of 2 F:\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET.doc Rev 7/14/00 *City of Carlsbad Planning Department January 16, 2003 Ha Schmidt 1650 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT NO. SDU 02-22 - SCHMIDT/PARK UNIT- Request to develop a detached 624 square foot second dwelling unit on APN 205-130-25, 1650 Chestnut, City of Carlsbad, CA in the R-1 Zone and Local Facilities Management Zone 1. Dear Ms. Schmidt: The Planning Director has completed a review of your application for an Administrative Second Dwelling Unit Permit for a detached 624 square foot second dwelling unit on a portion of Tract 244 of Thum Lands. After careful consideration of this request including written and verbal comments and objections from surrounding property owners, if any, the Planning Director has determined that the findings required for granting an Administrative Permit for a second dwelling unit can be made and, therefore, APPROVES this request based on the following findings and conditions: Findings: 1. That the detached second dwelling unit has a separate entrance, does not exceed 640 square feet, is architecturally compatible with the existing primary unit and complies with all of the applicable development standards of the R-1 zone. 2. That the Planning Director has determined that the project belongs to a class of projects that the State Secretary for Resources has found do not have a significant impact on the environment, and it is therefore categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents pursuant to Section 15303 (one single family residence or a second dwelling unit in a residential zone) of the state CEQA Guidelines. In making this determination, the Planning Director has found that the exceptions listed in Section 15300.2 of the state CEQA Guidelines do not apply to this project. 3. That the project is consistent with Objective 3.7 of the Housing Element of the General Plan in that second dwelling units provide a housing type alternative that is affordable to lower income households. 4. That pursuant to Attachment "A": A. The owner/applicant agrees to rent the second dwelling unit at a monthly rental rate which shall not exceed an amount equal to 30% of the gross monthly income of a low-income household, adjusted for household size, at 80% of the San Diego County median income. 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-4600 • FAX (760) 602-8559 • www.ci.carlsbad.ca.us -^ SOU 02-22 -'January 16, 2003 9. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, owner/applicant shall submit to the City a Notice of Restriction to be filed in the office of the County Recorder, subject to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, notifying all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of Carlsbad has issued a Second Dwelling Unit Permit on the real property owned by the owner/applicant. Said Notice of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. The Notice of Restriction shall specify that all owners and successors in interest are required to sign and file an Affidavit of Compliance for this Second Dwelling Unit. The Planning Director has the authority to execute and record an amendment to the notice, which modifies or terminates said notice upon a showing of good cause by the owner/applicant or successor in interest. 10. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within 18 months from the date of project approval. Engineering: 11. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Developer shall may all fees, deposits, and charges for connection to public facilities. Developer shall pay the San Diego County Water Authority capacity charge(s) prior to issuance of building permits. 12. The Developer shall install potable water services and meters at a location approved by the Deputy City Engineer - Utilities. The locations of said services shall be reflected on public improvements plans. 13. The Developer shall install sewer laterals and clean-outs at a location approved by the Deputy City Engineer - Utilities. The location of sewer laterals shall be reflected on public improvements plans. 14. The project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not be issued for the development of the subject property, unless the Deputy City Engineer - Utilities has determined that adequate water and sewer facilities area available at the time of occupancy. Code Reminders 15. Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building permit issuance, except as otherwise specifically provided herein. 16. Premise identification (addresses) shall be provided consistent with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.04.320. PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Address Planner Chris Sexton APN: Phone (760) 602-4624 Type of Project & Use: <SOJL>~- Zoning: K""( General Plan: Net Project Density:,DP/AC CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation: Facilities Management Zone: / Remaining net dev acres:_ Circle One (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: ) D DD Legend: 13 Item Complete Q 'tern Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: APPROVAL/RESO. NO.. PROJECT NO. J YES J/_ NO TYPESPU- DATE I-I Co' OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego CA 92108-4402; (619)767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now. Coastal Permit Determination Log #: Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO t-"^ (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21,1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES NO (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) Site Plan: H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 1. Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). </>''-' 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. ODD D-dn o-a Policy 44 - Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines 1. Applicability: YES NO_ n 2. Project complies YES Zoning: 1 . Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: 2. Accessory structure setb Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Structure separation: 3. Lot Coverage: NO Required olO' Required (f> Required Required lot' Required tacks: Required Required JV Required Required £5 > Required /O' Required^ ^lO/o Shown rJO Shown fa Shown Shown j& * Shown Shown Shown &?' Shown Shown ISi ' Shown (Q1 Shown ^ ^ICfh 4. Height:Required.Shown nan Spaces Required.. O Shown5. Parking: (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional Comments OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst Rev 9/01 T/6/V51 O 7-/£3 2.- (XT T. xr 7 ^ /£ ^> &s;~r x _&_ z. /c. ^±5=^ /^^- «s$ >W* P/yc^jc/ 7~~'~S's7?,rt<- 4+y^/ ^<3C. 77 /r?£Z /Q <0 i~ <?S»>C,// 34 - X 7fcr /Z--7/7 x __ P "27 '* Jo / -z4- " 4*% o . <=> ^ /\/a. - /. T ~ l.O Asb A/- MS /<>£ /IB fZI •2-20-03 , / 7 722. 722 s 37 - Zo - /e 2 n 45 l&n A/- f 5/^X. ~ <A /-a <=>r ~ So -rub 14- r /cc3</ re -S Of. T- ;o 3 ;o = \ ~~ \ £~2 II .Job* /•Z SHEAR WALL PANEL ^SCHEDULE (PER 1997 UBC) MAKK A A /§\ fy\ A /€\ A WALL TYPE & NAIL SPACING (COMMON OR BOX) 5/8* Drywoll, blocked, with 6d cooler nofl* O 4" o.c. at edges and field 7/8" stucco ovsr paper backed lath w/tl Co. x 1.5" gafv. nail O 6* o.c. at top and bottom platei, edge of wall and in field set note f3 below 3/8' COX plywood w/8d noil* O 6* o.e. atedge* and O 12" a.e. in field tee note {5 below 3/B" COX plwwood w/8d noil* O 4" o.c. at edges and 0 12* o.c. In field Uie 2* wide framing member at adjoiningp«:n«f edges and single 3* sill plate 3/8" COX plywood w/6d nails O 3* o.c. at edges and O 12* a.c. In fieldUse 3* wide framing member at adjoiningpanel edges and single 3* sill plate 3/8* COX plywood w/8d nails O 2* o.c. atedges and O 12" o,e. in field Use 3" wide framing member at adjoining panel edges and single 3* sill plate 1/2" Str. 1 plywood »/10d noils O 2" a.c. at edges and O 12" o.c. In field Use 3* wide framing member at adjoiningpanel edges and single 3" sill plate ALLOWABLE SHEAR, PLF 85.5 C175) 180 280 (•520) 380 (•780) 490 (•980) 640 (•1280) 870 (•1740) ANCHOR BOLTS (10* LONG) 5/8' 0 72* (•5/8" O 72") < DBL SIDED 5/8" 0 72" 5/8" 0 84" (•5/8' 0 32"), < DBL SIDED 5/8" 0 46" (•5/8" 0 2,3") < OBL. SIDED 5/8' 0 34* (•5/8* 0 16") < DBL SIDED 5/8" 0 26" (•5/8" 0 13") < DBL SIDED 5/8" 0 16" (•3/4" 0 12") < DBL SIDED UPPER aOOR SILL NAIUNC led e IB" (»16d O 8") 16d 0 8" 16d O 8" (•16d O 3") 16d 0 4* (•18d 0 2") 16d O 3.5" (•2-16d 0 3.5") 16d 0 2.5" (•2-16d O 2.5") 1Ed O 2* (•2-1 6d 0 2') A35 SPACING 72" 40" 24" 18' 14" 22" BOTH SIDES 16" BOm SIOES NOTES: and 6" c.c. otherwise. 1- ( • —- ) in the table designates that shear wall sheathing is to be applied on both faces of wall. 2. All plywood edges must be blocked with 2x solid blocking. Field nailing shall be 12" o.c for stud spaced at 16" o.c. 3. Paper backed self-furring expanded metal loth with ICSO approval. 4. Where allowable shear values exceed 350 plf, foundation sill plates and all framing members receiving edge nailing from abutting panels shall not be less than 3—inch nominal member. Noils shall be staggered. 5. Where plywood is applied on both faces of a wall and nail spacing is less than 6 inches on center on either side, panel joints shall be offset to fall on different framing members or framing shall be 3-inch nominal or thicker ond nails on each side shall be staggered. 6. All continuous exterior footing shall have 5/8" x 10" A.B. O 6' o.c. far monolithic pour concrete system and 5/8" x 15* A.8. for non-monolithic pour concrete system unless ot shear wall panel where anchor bolts shall be installed per shear wall schedule. 7. All Interior bearing ond non-bearing footing's shall have 7/32" shot pins C 32* o.c. & 48" o.c. respectively, fl. All anchor bolt shall have plot* wohers a minimum of 2" x 2" x 3/18* thick. Olo-sibzmCOIDOOOm0mxa O CO O Ol CD O) -vl CD C/3 C/5 •Oo 3 o> oo O § *Jwoo Bw w STONE TRUSS COMPANY www. stonetruss. com STONE TRUSS CO. CERTIFIED INSPECTION ICBO EVALUATION SERVICE INC. AA-583 IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH UBC 2321.3 PREFABRICATED WARNING * WARNING * WARNING BE SURE ERECTION CONTRACTOR UNDERSTANDS HIB-91. SUMMARY SHEET ENCLOSED 507 JONES ROAD • OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92054 • (760) 967-6171 • FAX (760) 967-6178 E-mail: stcjnc@ix.netcom.com ST001 8'18'-2H 00o to O<oS DESIGNED BY:JOB DESCRIPTION: SCHMIDT ADDITION JOB LOCATION: 1650 CHESTNUT AVE <=»• gg-pj»*3 i-H£^ m r- 3*. tn * f»* JJ«^m -« x 2 mr-o»i*a!O>>»3« v» (A *n m a m •<c «* O ** MOM-.?SM3=*5Smo°2S2S53-55-* •" O M•-.*>. «*l O •n*-,-*<•n ~* e* -* f «>- • r» -< ••O*2as : TI ^ m rt <o* —t -v ••* 0 »• v» w ^ f i~ »"».,.5ss- s isSSsS^I o 33 >-—I cr> r>o oonWOO C*> O en voro-j Ovo roin i,. cnatizOOD^ "D»-<3DOmen o o -tenmoumean .o-< t-n zm-i>oiz O-H r-OJO|-(/)-DTID •n-ir-o-110m a1 -iozCOutmo rnao-4ID (/)<tnr TJ• emuzonODO~niOJ-IOPSSO 03 >ooo r-<lro 01 -< on om23 M3J M COT3>fTl • r--c •-3 en W - en > Mz: t-<o tr1 o o O MM » W > •^ O » MMa H G K •-3 W W H H OE 13 W O f KO O> »O O M o 5j rn 8 §o > w SK o W w oH Z mO eni—i M Z " O » •" JO ^ G wM en50 rn O tuma 3§ - W cnaom in~ rnmz zrn-01 m m on-tnmm mor- o i- ^ ^? O^OOOGQOOOolxXQ 0 0 0 00 §11/000 O/X^O D 0 0 00000000000Hiolf §31 n3i?l <?*siS25S5 ?s||i; lPisicsss5-* 5c=?!i^ii;>i.gi£|, i^!?' c: n o 0n a> m o <£><x ]/ X x 00 i>o' m> 13> II > OT3,s —1(m O N) -- LfiOO cn cn as IA _,— CJn 01 0 cn O CTI cn oi oo o oo XX\1<r o n **x <" \1 _£ 5 X V A > p o nooooQOQ'0 53 0000 00ofioooooooov» a rils?83;- 5 £ " = CSsSPSggam «i oMH* ^ > O •* e I *8SlsSf l<s»I-* 5 >-<n<£mmz1 I " •!• 5 3 ' S2»S»£•*• 4OW *n m 3 5S2go'"S5gSS = o-.223!:!J = lsi§^.§slSI?|_n=Ki_=-g- mg- 3 - 3 - 5o — > o "n zo 5 S •« t * 9'S e 2SS5 == a»5SS-" a -OOO-*TJSZ;Tmwt«t = -^i--c-<fi o>3 — •*Ol't>*" ^^zz r~ m j ^ 3E H 5 11*~ 5 * B 5 * * -5n*"**~w» — w . | 521^ = = ^ 2 llZsl-lagla _ « « « — as " o o a r- comm o a T3 TD TD TD T3tn (n c/i (/>~n 11 TI TI TI \ o N)x X00 MX * o I/ o 33 O33II COCo CO CO CO 3)mi—tenmooiT3O3m33 r- -a o o8m m o33 CO Z> en M <r- O O m r- -I > •-. 33 O> :i-i > C I X X x x x X COITrr 1g <P K)6 •PCO VJ fc i uO) COu a en •jj <b 6 ^>.o o oor* 9o m CD 5^-,cl£SSSsS!Si 383i"^125" *§^oi* ?-n«I2 ^| 3Si|n<l? Pp-^ wSRi*3Ss£5 :b-i §S|Rg"3feB Sogl!i&I^g^is §*ss-s i3§^S|Si| ||{£|| laai^iagjaj ^W.-ZT•^1C> i-^ £~(-t _mv"f7»-n -!f^Rw^a Ka-^^sg'" s ?M?g 5 -3 CO COQ o o -3 >-3o o o S T) no T)C/i CO CO TJ IflW to O HHCO wjs°"' S^§3^S|gg .asgls 113 |- so li CO/I ^PITCHED ANDCHORD AREA\ / ~ \\ \ w 2 $2 KM J 7?— / / IM \ \t ( '( I/"7 — 9 X > ( \j r ( J I , ^i <1 — / WO Is ^\ ,--•• s RAFTERS-— -— IIII —r- . I*L 0 T"I*JL -towIo c o g o H ni—i Q Ma b o OJJOOOOOOOQOT100000000s*§|fi$£§ %zi§:i*ii £SS«S 2c= f 2°" f o ?; T3E^'t-'^^'XS ^_5s~ = «iii!"s Z•* * 3 S a o -* S |aanx^xsv* —13?f-S3fSS *« — u M . ft w z ^ 3C~-<-»o-o n'V C«|_8J-«I's<;=°a822sSS?s S|c *i _ to.i;-or'E2: ~ S E 5 « ** I O O •-l!S?i?2!a — < iill =£i •« r» ^!is §252 = ^ S ? m 3 - _ _"" 2 jt C 5 e 3?SlS?S=» SllCCa'slS Mi3 g-lsi: I s S Sn =— g oj§js5 = i| gS" S2 «IS Jt »?^lr, M!K§:i5: i« -?§ Amss ru o CD CD en 0000 "D TJ T3 T3 T)en tn tn w o)TI -i, TI -n -n K 33 cn is•^ -" M O " r S O 2G iJ >w X <-3 "3 M• M 2 Z ^ G 3 3 I CDm 33 O 3 wcn m 33 O H Z G PJ O Z X W O i-3 G O O -d'aoM ;dco T3 i-3 Ma i M O » Ot >o ^ r1 -3 rtn 2» o•^'--s2:;D V 669 'ESO 'E s?s«;s!^3s;iSoS."!:Iqs°sisis";w •< > H i*. c M •s*3S£38qz«c x c o!? i. 'iisZMiMCZCvimvi..rf>iin -< O • i/i>»mi/>x2«* o~<m t- vioi~(A>£-'f<-o £2,Sg'3 SSS~ S S " c S . 3 5 H >• " "•?P^SS?" mi-in^*o>»jw wiv>rr)mxm^SJg0J>^Sl!So SSSSS;|£S|H •^ - o ^CO PICD Z X XO O O —• S = • iIf £"»SS? oomcwooxw ipg; cr — oczo -VIO X >— — O M O > v£— — O Me» r» z H o j£- m m o(T>(n ID 3 r>-5 — V O » O •»! « VI £J f I ' S?-mo •HX<ooSz<-o^ssiJs:*"11""-w -< — x T • e= £i3!s.|"s|S |2 "55" " ~ wm » o T) -, M * ___-.„WCHII^X — OH " I-CIH-• viz z * x > -n x vi » >Pip-»niSi>i->2 Ci-•o _«r» r-(--5 >'»v>r: m O X » H *-!-** -H » W „A-Din o o z e ; H— zm » m D » ^ > o t» ( x— ^>m3 i^,^>«> o o x o o o> ro —Io o o o i— o o r- O O O •D T3 T3 "O "D CO CO t/> CO CO COmO CDOOcn oro Oco ^^ CO COoCO TO TOrroTOmin-ao on o*r-f OS • •c a> —iQ. r» INJII014*rsj O) CO 00 o<(0 COc o T rt W 00 e»cert> CO X X CT> -n =fcTO !-• -D 00 -OO CO o o Oo oo oL ISJJko r-> r~opo i— X S70 O on §o \jj5 > -o o i vi"- > H H X •* IW OZ!£H-I'*I«D_ a C » cows'" *" X z o >•* ii •- > z * "SJgSjS^*™!-; 1SSS5S! -,-,zxn s?; gZ>-l^>>-Z^ T|H Sozsq"1*^! 5SKE9D<*II*I o OXC^ H» 2 v>o O XOOQ oomo —I CD CO —I —Io <~> o f> c~> I— O O o o o o -O TD -0 -O CO CO 1/1 CO CO c:o CDO O"mooCD TO 5OVI O OISJOo^-^ t- CD CO 00 O<(t> -3 ro oocT3T3O-5 00—Io CD70 o50CDrnTO-omyo r» OOc n>Q. i-i- rvjf\3X*.o TO OO o-n i—00 »-. CD *-• O O (-> •XI>• oo cz00 ro o O t.O CDTO o>• CD «O m O —lO O>• TO-ooTO OO o>• OJ CD © CO II*°H~sC ^ H ^ •• o > v>o?>*i > nO > » O • X O I m i — ^O- • o z o •* ~ in 2 r- m „»O ormn -i- ,m£SKm?PigrnOzv-H ~i~£ is " 5S"|w» O O * O O 5 SS CO CO —to <-> c-> o O en ^ en o o o o TJ T3 T3 "O T3l/> CO C/> CO CO mooO CD 73 3Dm oo o o00•—i ro ro rotr> xxx73 •II CTl CO OD o<<t> -3 ro in T3O O1 01 ro fro o o o CD DOO 00 ID 'J * z o i— -o—i 00 00 —.—< <3D pn -o >• •oC73 OO O —IO o>• LO 00 -w ^ > H m c v> • zntoiin > .v -«IA<A mwiwS?o^*«*fwSwx2tft O-Hf- (AOI-VI >•£••«• Onvm • m — • — i- 2 e o-<>f- VI *I-*«B«*I« 0 r <•» o —-<>« 30 « 5 S ° * ° - S 3 * 3 5- ? * « s g ; : s . ^ * s ° "•>-«mi->. w»»mgo- o mr-w>xo>»2oc- x• viwtmnizm^jDZ- >c-io H v> o </i _ o r z— »zoi> — m-o° mvtof-c *4 »«» o^wvcrov»-ix>mzxx_lxviH«« «A X l*< 01 » «VlI!> HZx ««3itfiHn-iMzi-onoprtMCwooxvr:r--iO — > X r-M x fst —' -tzcrooi--o;'n'- >X 1*1 » O xwi * S vt 3t *~mzxnom o £>(n$r--* «1 > > tfl C » * O« mO — PI< -1 Z±3DZMOvt n z o - x-x -»-^< ° o o o•vvio z >• . D " at >o~»Ovio>v 5 *" ° • *" o>- z x m — ^ o_.o« °--icq-jq. Cir~mn HZ-wogz<-«-<« (A O > •VO»"ZQf*lOHVtZ-0-VtZ.. • • •« -t"'B > «or*oof--ia^ m«-m » o ^ ™ v jE » fi ^»»cmtAZ — O-4 m 1-1*1-4• ss,i5s;f ;» <w?S0:!3 r-pS 53S»-nm o OZCtT H ••-.5 ; s'-ss ss? s- -( PZH" m-«*tfio o ZOOn OOm —I DO CD —Io o r> o O CD O O -O "O "O "O T3 CO CO CO OO CO oZO mooCO TO 30on O Oro ro roXXX^ *. 0130II 01 CO 00 o -5 r\> CO -aT3O ini—»ooi—»tn -J O1CTI fro o o *_ OonCO on a*rr CO ••c n> —iO. rf PO1=3COmTOO CO COO oort Q. 30 i—• m on *—i CO'oio oo — opo -n4^ -no i— o>• -t 1^1^010 M -* » ^ *fO>-O'*>O-49BX*<«-4 m• •H^JjIJCp •J52Sglsr-5|lSsS2p^DH5 II(—*Oz:ii 'SSS - ww0- j * o Z > S n, S o « g o g OM-ix>mxi:z,xv>~>-i>i^MXPIOtX — trt 5 > -t X 35—»w — ftH — ifomcifi«"it«M:w<tOX(»r.r~HO — > * f~ w i f* — o^ZOviOZ'*i"4ni — XniozVMvSmm O •» g > » o w >ox *• •« S - •* ™ « K - -* S 3SI°85"S"? - i ~ > - " - ,p HO > » O •« « o z ^uc m ci z « o -4 m I-PIH;,•VIX Z Z * > -n _ -CM3VWpiO'«mpi>r->>Z ef» «wn '"r-S >•««»?. CO—Io ro o o o COc: -oo 70II O.&.rvj II OJ .r o o X Ul —I CD CO -HO <~> <~> <~>VO o O O I—IN> a 3 3 t= r-tn z oCD >.(^ O) Ol D) ("">O r^- rf «-f •QJ IIQ. M- vIV> O O •QI . . . ro<-t- O O O <J1O O OO O O -0—-^ OJ O Oc-D -O -0 3D (—• O I—' tJI*» O ^ ^" m o oOD TO TOIS) O O VOCDOoTOtnr» ODC 0>O. n-roxtn CD O O 3O O GO 3O 5?o O -H O oo m—i "~> r- •oc70 W<AO«AOZOD«SoC C •»» — H v Z • V)5M — _4fT| v« 2°'~t'*Ir- H ^ •• o > wt o ? ni r^ >. mo>»o-zoxf>i£~ -n S— * o i o-n — t«2'~*'T"Z»i( •« — ^ — X -t •e>r-mn HZ-oei2*<-«:-e•*VlO>T>O^ZC>l*t0-IMX-O-tflZ.. • • -«t -tPI -C — I •» • O ^ •«»•«v> o m r- »• > » >. ™•>>Zf»< Z > ^ OOOZ>H > > - Z 2 "V-1r'-< —| CD CD —4 O C"> f> <~) o trt 4* o\ o o o o CO CO CO t/> CO o o—I -aTO 'II ro O O O n> -5 COC O-5rt</i IIco .rro o o o O o r-3 3 s 15CD >•m oTO CO•^ CO «^> C3t="O -D -D 50 coopnco voooo00 I—i-t-Q. >»b=fcCO O-r-r- CDC IDO. r*o o o -oro CT*co o o CO—4CCO(->o TO OO -n CO—ITO COeno o2 r> ro^.o en o >— O ~; "-ri S.5 *sss°~°-,gs:35:i? s * „ i § ; s s .' * ; ° - -, tn I *-i Oi » «-w»l|> -4** «»w — r>-t — ^Ct-OfCi -• I c» »- • m n -H > z > • >r- o in » > •- H *2 H n"•«:>• « «BX — jH-tw —-HZOOW>f-C)Of>OWZ P 5 , i 5 >. " » o ; S P S SQ>»0- zoxfflj;- -no•-BOZ O^^-tov1"11" 5°s"I ssi« ;s^HJO vt ut m [JJ oJOr" via o zoo£J oomi O OO CD —I —I i— o o r- o o o o "O "D "a T3 "DCO CO CO CO CO oo n — r~w A1tn*rIO !-•? *-• L l—• COo>•oo m <~>m o>COrvjoo H 00 CD OO SO O ?£ — -oz > Z CO r-> 33 so o o so —. —I ZfO .-^ C"5 >n*gmnv)»«f> » w -w ~ •SISJfciSJESsSSSJ?~*''***00SS5j=2H£si^SzZ-^o^iZrtg-lSHZ*fc-O — O'*1>O-*»Z * •» HiL^TS^gs"'S5S.3^sr-sjgsssjE-oHs;s,s ."gcr_?|- s0-°a en % X PI 3D OV J|j > » O ! Sm*»O » vt "n vixr^Hzznom o g > m F i- x »~* Hi--t<- >_.-»"-*"3r-n2S55*>S,;3SgSc>S222o^,§>S jSn-'J:5 s s • s , ; : s " ? 5 « ° j CD CD —< —I O O O O r- o o r— o o o o "O T3 T3 T3 tJCO OO l/l CO CO COXIICOUlCDCOCDo c•o U) O O r"ro 3 3 e= r-en 3OCD >•i— m oCD 3D CO>-• enO CT> O Oo c== -O t3 30O r-^OJex COozmo co <-> r}rf Z ZC m oCT CD 3Do. ro ro roXXXt cr> *. CTIro30rfCOUl>eenn >rs "ll CO CO HH COCTlO CD O <-> 50 O CO TO -O > > r-- Z CO o c?<-> TO TO CD o —Io ro "n10 —I >H(*•» - X f > O X82,53'3 SS, p 8 ^ c g „ S ! ; * S £ S 2 g Sg*s?2;;i!:iieM« <A<APimzm^*z- >me ~* ° _ i »A « » 0 o f x- : >-xoviff>z<*i-4m_xr>ioz>v» 5 * m » o •» 5 > JB o vi £HiJr-SS5.-S»SJ- J"xrn-o » *A » o wtXf-«;sscs5«s £>^5g; mo«ni« H z^xzviO] V) f*l Z O • >--X •« -C ° O O O |•» v» o z > _i "» — * > i-S — — o w> o > w y m n ' ZHOOZH •» 3B O ± 3" > Of>wz^^jn^-w-m^r-Ha: >JJ*"s^S^*».°">"*itr^^^i_.._^a?:i D > * O • Z O X f £ — tl O 3 »-tnO>TiO"-Z*e>ni • m^2z'orl''e" to ' •«»•»(vi o"ii- «. p »>*-r•— > z n ^ z > i onO Z > H > >. - Z 2 •« -< -S OfOrt^HZHtT m •• —W 9BO-0-VI Z »0.» = «««S-o;i^w ^Si;... ."E?i ssT:-n W O OZC,T -H •— zm IB mow* >OVn-i» wt M nt-JI n»»- X- H Sz-t* «H-r vtp o z o o g 00^3 •« —mo5SS"3 —I CO O3 —I —Io o o o o r- o o r- o o o o "O T3 T3 -O -OCO CO CO CO CO 00 >—ImCO C m oo- OD 50O" C/> O>- o. KO ro ronCOenCDCOODo-Jro COc•o o -5 TO II _-n -n -ncoCT>O ro >— iCO1CTO-otnxeno—Io o o-o —-O TOo oon rn 00 o o en- o m3: i 03 O en5o z >•en -ac TO en O O ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY ROBERT CHAN, RE. P.O.BOX 1932 • EL C AJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 TELEPHONE(619)447-4747 April 16,2003 Architura. P.O. Box 4453 Carlsbad, CA. 92018-4453 Subject: Project No. 03-1106G5 Review of Foundation Plan Proposed Accessory Dwelling Site 1650 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: The undersigned has reviewed the foundation plan for the proposed accessory dwelling to be constructed on subject property, more specifically referred to as being Assessor's Parcel No. 205-130-25, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California. Based on a review of the above foundation plan, it has been determined that the foundation and slab recommendations as presented in Project Soil Investigation Report prepared by our firm, dated March 18, 2003 have been properly incorporated into the plans. especttully submitted, ALLIED EARTyTECHNOLOGY Addressee ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY ROBERT CHAN, RE. P.O.BOX 1932 • EL CAtON. CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 TELEPHONED! 9)447-4747 April 14,2003 Architura P.O. Box 4453 Carlsbad, CA. 92018-4453 Subject: Project No. 03-1106G5 Addendum to Report of Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Accessory Dwelling Site 1650 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California Gentlemen: Reference is made to our Report of Geotechnical Investigation, same Project Number as above, dated March 18, 2003. It is our understanding that access to the proposed accessory dwelling site along the rear of the property is limited, and it will be difficult to bring in conventional grading equipment to perform the necessary grading. As an alternative to para. 6 to 10 under Grading in the above-mentioned report, it is recommended that: 1. After the site has been cleared and grubbed, it is recommended that the upper sandy soils be saturated with water. 2. These upper sandy soils should be then compacted with a portable vibrator. The upper 6 inches below finished grade should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density in accordance with A.S.T.M. D1557, in order to provide adequate support to the proposed concrete slab. The area of compaction should extend at least 5 feet beyond the foundation line of the proposed dwelling. 3. The foundation trench excavations for the proposed dwelling should extend through the upper soils at least 12 inches into the underlying competent natural soils (for a total embedment on the order of 24 inches below existing grade). Project No. 03-1106G5 Architura 1650 Chestnut Avenue 04/14/03 Page 2 Steel reinforcements in the foundation and slab should follow recommendations under para. 14 and 15 under Foundation and slab design of the above mentioned report. All other recommendations, other than the alternative provided above, should be followed. espectfully ALLIED EA ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY P.O.BOX 1932 • EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 TELEPHONED 19)447-4747 FOR • ROBERT CHAN, RE. I I • GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED ACCESSORY DWELLING SITE • 165TCHESTNUT AVENUE • CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA I I • MRS. ILA SCHMIDT I • ARCHITURA PROJECT ARCHITECT • PROJECT NO. 03-1106G5 " MARCH 18,2003 I I c I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY ROBERT CHAN, P.E. P.O.BOX 1932 • EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 TELEPHONED 19)447-4747 March 18, 2003 Mrs. Ila Schmidt 1650 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, CA. 92008 Subject:Project No. 03-1106G5 Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Accessory Dwelling Site 1650 Chestnut Avenue Carlsbad, California Gentlemen : In accordance with your request and authorization, we have completed the geotechnical investigation for the proposed accessory dwelling site on subject property, more specifically referred to as being Assessor's Parcel No. 205-130-25, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California. We are pleased to submit the accompanying geotechnical investigation report to present our findings, conclusions and recommendations relative to the development of the project site. The geotechnical investigation was conducted under the supervision of the undersigned. The scope of our investigations included field exploration, laboratory testing and geotechnical analysis. No adverse geotechnical conditions were encountered which would prohibit the development of the site. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully subpntted, ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY I I Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 I » * I • TABLE OF CONTENTS I I • DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 1 | SCOPEOFWORK 2 _ FIELD INVESTIGATION 2 LABORATORY TESTS 3 | SITE DESCRIPTION 4 • SITE GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS 4 GROUNDWATER 4 I TECTONIC SETTING 5 • GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Groundshaking 5 • Liquefaction Potential 6 Landslides 6 • FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General 6 • Expansion Indices of On-Site Soils 7 Sulfate Content of On-Site Soils 7 Grading 7 I Foundation and Slab Design 8 Retaining Wall Design 9 Lateral Loading 11 I I » * I • TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'nd) I UBC Seismic Coefficients 11 I Backfill Over Utility Trenches 12 Surface Drainage and Maintenance 12 Grading and Foundation Plan Review 12 I LIMITATION AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS 13 • Figure No. 1 - Site Location Map Figure No. 2 - Approximate Location of Exploratory Borings _ Figure Nos. 3 to 6, inclusive - Boring Log Sheet • Appendix I - General Grading and Earthwork Specifications Appendix II - Laboratory Tests I I I I I I I I I ALLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGY | ==^=== P.O.BOX 1932 • EL CAJON, CALIFORNIA 92022-1932 | ROBERT CHAN, RE. TELEPHONE(6,9,W-4747 I • March 18,2003 I GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings and conclusions of a geotechnical investigation I conducted at the site of a proposed accessory dwelling, located along the rear, north _ end of the property located at 1650 Chestnut Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad, State of California. The location of the property is shown on Figure No. 1, entitled, "Site Location I Map". I Subject property is more specifically referred to as being Assessor's Parcel No. m 205-130-25. • DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT It is our understanding that an accessory dwelling is proposed in the north, rear I portion of the site. The proposed structure will be two stories in height of • woodframe/stucco and slab-on-grade construction. I I I v • • Project No. 03-1106G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 Page 2 1650 Chestnue Avenue • SCOPE OF WORK The objectives of the investigation were to inspect and determine the subsurface ™ soil conditions and certain physical, engineering properties of the soils beneath the site, I and to evaluate any potential adverse geotechnical conditions that could affect the proposed project, in order that engineering recommendations could be presented relative to the safe and economical development as presently proposed. In order to accomplish these objectives, a total of three exploratory borings were I excavated and inspected, and representative samples of the subsurface soils were _ collected for laboratory testing and analysis. • The data derived from the field observations and laboratory test results were reviewed and analyzed, and a summary of our preliminary findings, opinions and | recommendations is presented in this report. I FIELD INVESTIGATION • The field exploratory phase of our investigation was performed on February 25, 2003, and involved a reconnaissance of the site, and the excavation of three exploratory I borings. These exploratory borings were drilled with a motorized continuous flight • auger. The exploratory borings were excavated at various locations on the site where the most useful information relative to subsurface soil conditions may be obtained. The • exploratory borings were excavated to a depth of 6.0 feet below existing ground surface. I I I 1 ' • Project No. 03-1106G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 Page 3 1650 Chestnut Avenue • The location of the exploratory borings is shown on Figure No. 2, entitled, "Approximate Location of Exploratory Borings". _ The drilling operation was performed under the direction of our field personnel, and a continuous log of the soil types encountered in the borings was recorded at the • time of drilling, and is shown on Figure Nos. 3 to 5, inclusive, each entitled, "Boring _ Log Sheet". • The soils were visually and texturally classified by the field identification procedures set forth on the Unified Soil Classification Chart. Representative samples I were obtained at various depths in the borings. The in-situ densities of the soils • encountered were determined with a Triggs penetrometer. • LABORATORY TESTS The samples collected during our field investigation were subjected to various 8 tests in the laboratory to evaluate their engineering characteristics. The tests were • performed in accordance with current A.S.T.M. testing standards or other regulatory agency testing procedures. A summary of the tests that were performed and the final test • results are presented in Appendix II hereto. • The tests that were performed included determinations of the maximum I densities and optimum moisture contents, the sulfate content as well as the Expansion Indices of the soils encountered. I I I I Project No. 03-1106G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 Page 4 1650 Chestnut Avenue • SITE DESCRIPTION The property consists of a rectangular-shaped lot of approximately 7,500 square feet, situated on the north side of Chestnut Avenue, between Highland Drive and Valley I Street. The topography of the general area, including the site, may be described as _ relatively level. Surface drainage on subject site is directed in a southerly direction into Chestnut Avenue. A single-story single-family residence, small separate office building and green I house currently occupies the site. I SITE GEOLOGY AND SUBSURFACE SOIL CONDITIONS • A review of available geologic maps indicate that the general area is underlain by the Quaternary-age terrace deposits, generally consisting of reddish brown, poorly | bedded, poorly indurated sandstones and siltstones. On subject property, these terrace • deposits v/ere encountered in the form of light brown, medium dense fine sands. These terrace deposits were overlain by a 12-inch topsoil layer consisting of dark brown fine | sands with abundant root and vegetation matters. I GROUNDWATER • No groundwater was encountered in the exploratory, borings to the maximum depth of exploration at 6.0 feet. I I I • Project No. 03-1106G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 Page 5 1650 Chestnut Avenue • TECTONIC SETTING No evidence of faulting was noted during our surface reconnaissance or in our exploratory borings. A review of available geologic literature did not reveal any I major faulting in the area. It should be noted that much of Southern California, including _ the City of Carlsbad area, is characterized by a series of Quaternary-age fault zones which typically strike in a northerly to northwesterly direction. Some of these • fault zones (and the individual faults within the zone) are classified as active while others _ are classified as only potentially active according to the criteria of the California Division of Mines and Geology. A review of available geologic maps indicate that the subject property is | approximately 37.9 km (23.7 miles) southwest of the Elsinore/Julian Fault zone (Type A • Fault), and 9.0 km (5.6 miles) southeast of the Newport-Inglewood (offshore) Fault Zone (Type B Fault). I GEOLOGIC HAZARDS | Groundshaking - The most likely geologic hazard to affect the site is ground- I shaking as a result of movement along one of the active fault zones mentioned above. I For seismic design purposes, soil parameters per the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code were determined using the UBCSEIS Program, and presented • hereinafter. I I 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 Project No. 03-11 06G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 1650 Chestnut Avenue Liquefaction Potential - In consideration of the competent natural soils site and the absence of high groundwater level, it is our opinion that soil Page 6 underlying the liquefaction does not present a significant geotechnical hazard to the proposed site development. Landslides - Review of available geologic maps of the area and site observations did not reveal signs of any ancient landslides. The terrain of the general area is relatively level, and the potential for landslides on subject and adjacent properties is considered minimal. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General 1 . Based on the results of the investigation, it is our opinion that the currently proposed site development is feasible from a geotechnical engineering standpoint, 1 1 1 provided that the recommendations presented in this report are incorporated into the design plan(s) and are properly implemented during the construction phase. 2. It is noted that some of the recommendations may have to be modified and supplemental recommendations may have to be presented, depending on the 1 1 1 1 1 actual subsurface conditions encountered during construction. 3. All of the soils encountered on the site are suitable for use as supporting materials for the proposed structure(s), provided that the recommendations are followed. contained herein I • Project No. 03-1106G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 Page 7 1650 Chestnut Avenue • Expansion Indices of On-Site Soils 4. The soils encountered on the site possess low expansion potential (Expansion " Index = 35). Sulfate Content of On-Site Soils I 5. Laboratory test results indicate that the soils are subject to moderate sulfate _ exposure (Sulfate content of 428 ppm). It is recommended that the requirements for concrete exposed to sulfate-containing solutions as presented in Table 19-A-4 I of the Uniform Building Code be followed. • Grading • 6. It is recommended that the earthwork be accomplished in accordance with the Grading Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad, UBC Chapter A33, Appendix I | attached hereto, entitled, "General Grading and Earthwork Specifications", and • recommendations as presented in this Section. • 7. Where the recommendations of this Section of the report conflict with those of Appendix I, this Section of the report takes precedence. I 8. Grading operation should begin with the clearing and grubbing of the site. All • debris should be hauled away and disposed of offsite. ™ 9. After clearing and grubbing of the building areas is completed, it is recommended I I I • Project No. 03-1106G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 Page 8 1650 Chestnut Avenue • that the loose upper topsoils similar to those encountered in the exploratory borings to a depth of approximately 12 inches that remain below finished grade within 5 feet outside the foundation line of the proposed structure be removed. I The bottom of the excavation should be inspected by our firm, and scarified to a _ depth of 8 inches. The removed soils should then be properly moistened, and uniformly recompacted prior to the placement of any additional fill soils. 10. All fill soils should be properly moistened, placed in layers and compacted until J proposed grade elevations are reached. The layers of fill should not exceed 8 • inches for adequate bonding. All fill soils should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density at approximately 120% of optimum moisture | content in accordance with A.S.T.M. D1557. I Foundation and Slab Design • 11. It is recommended that a safe allowable soil bearing value of 1,500 pounds per square foot be used in the design and checking of continuous or spread footings I that are a minimum of 12 and 24 inches in minimum horizontal dimension, • respectively, and are embedded at least 18 inches (for two stories) below the surface of the competent natural or compacted filled ground surface. I 12. The above safe allowable soil bearing value may be increased by one third when • considering wind and/or seismic forces. I I I ™ Project No. 03-1106G5 Schmidt 093/18/03 Page 9 1650 Chestnut Avenue • 13. The settlement of foundations, when designed and loaded as outlined above, is _ within acceptable tolerance limits for light residential buildings of this type. _ 14. It is recommended that all continuous footings be reinforced with 2 #5 rebars; one rebar located near the top, and the other rebar near the bottom of the footings. I Isolated pier footings should be reinforced with a minimum of 2 #5 rebars, in both • directions, placed near the bottom of the footings. m 15. The concrete slab on grade should be 4 inches net in thickness, and be reinforced with #3 rebars @ 18 inches on center, placed at mid-height of slab. The concrete | slab should be underlain by 4 inches of clean sand. In areas to be tiled or • carpeted, a visqueen-type moisture barrier should be placed at grade and be overlain by one-inch of protective sand cover. This moisture barrier should be I heavily overlapped or sealed at splices. Please note that the foundation and slab • reinforcement requirements are based oil soil characteristics, and should be superceded by the requirements of the project architect. I 16. It is recommended that our firm inspect the foundation trench excavations for the B proposed structure to ensure proper embedment into competent natural or I compacted fill soils. I Retaining Wall Design 17. It is recommended that retaining walls be designed to withstand the pressures I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Project no. 03-1106G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 1650 Chestnut Avenue exerted by equivalent fluid weights presented below Backfill Surface (horizontal: vertical) Level 2:1 1 '/2: 1 Page 10 Equivalent Fluid Pressure (pcf) 35 48 56 This value assumes that the retaining walls are unrestrained from movement, and have a granular backfill. For retaining walls restrained from movement at the top, such as basement retaining walls, an uniform horizontal pressure of 7H (where H is the height of the retaining wall in feet) should be applied in addition to the active pressure recommended above. 18. The on-site soil conditions are such that standard retaining wall designs such as those presented in the Regional Standard Drawings or by the City of Carlsbad Building Department, may be used, where appropriate. Backfill soils should consist of soils having very low to low expansion potential (Expansion Index < 50), and should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density. 19. All retaining walls should be supplied with a backfill drainage system adequate to prevent the buildup of hydrostatic pressure. The subdrain should consist of % inch and a perforated pipe near the bottom of the retaining wall. The width of this I . • • Project No. 03-1106G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 Page 11 1650 Chestnut Avenue subdrain should be at least 12 inches, and extend at least 2/3 the height of the ™ retaining wall. The subdrain should be enclosed in a geotextile fabric such as • Mirafi 140N or equal. I Lateral Loading _ 20. To resist lateral loads, it is recommended that the pressure exerted by an equivalent fluid weight of 320 pounds per cubic foot be used for footings or shear • keys poured neat against properly compacted fill soils, or dense undisturbed _ natural soils. The upper 12 inches of material in areas not protected by floor slabs or pavement should not be included in the design for passive resistance. This | value assumes that the horizontal distance of the soil mass extends at least 10 feet • or three times the height of the surface generating the passive pressure, whichever is greater. I 21. A coefficient of sliding friction of 0.32 may be used for cast-in-place concrete on | competent natural or compacted fill soils. Footings can be designed to resist • lateral loads by using a combination of sliding friction and passive resistance. The coefficient of friction should be applied to dead load forces only. I UBC Seismic Coefficients 22. The seismic coefficients in accordance with the current Uniform Building Code I were determined using the UBCSEIS Program. The results are presented on the following page: I I •Project No. 03-11 06G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 Page 12 1650 Chestnut Avenue Soil Profile Type : Sc I Seismic Zone Factor : 0.4 ™ Seismic Source Type : B Near Source Factor : Na 1 .0 Nv 1.0 I Seismic Coefficient Ca = 0.40 Cv = 0.56 I Backfill Over Utility Trenches _ 23. It is recommended that backfill soils placed in utility trenches located within 5 feet of any improvements and deeper than 12 inches, or backfill soils placed in • any trench located 5 feet or more from a building and deeper than 5 feet, be _ compacted under our observation and tested to verify compliance with the earthwork specifications for the project. Surface Drainage and Maintenance | 24. Adequate drainage control and proper maintenance of all drainage facilities are • imperative to minimize infiltration of surface water into the underlying soil mass in order to reduce settlement potential and to minimize erosion. The building pad | should have drainage swales which direct storm and excess irrigation water away • from the structures and into the street gutters or other drainage facilities. No surface runoff should be allowed to pond adjacent to the foundation of structures. I Grading and Foundation Plans Review • 25. It is recommended that our firm review the final grading and foundation plans for I the proposed site development to verify their compliance with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter A33, as required by the State of California. I I • Project No. 03-1106G5 Schmidt 03/18/03 Page 13 1650 Chestnut Avenue • LIMITATION AND UNIFORMITY OF CONDITIONS 1. The preliminary findings and recommendations contained in this report pertain • only to the site investigated and are based on the assumption that the soil I conditions beneath the entire site do not deviate substantially from those disclosed in the exploratory borings. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during grading, or if the scope of the project differs from that • planned at the present time, our firm should be notified in order that supplemental • recommendations can be presented, if necessary. • 2. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the Owner, or his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations J presented herein are brought to the attention of the Project Architect and Engineer • and are incorporated into the plans and specifications for the project. Furthermore, the Owner, or his representative, will also be responsible for taking | the necessary measures to ensure that the Contractor and subcontractors properly M carry out the recommendations in the field. • 3. Professional opinions and recommendations presented in this report are based partly on our evaluation and analysis of the technical information gathered during I the study, partly on the currently available information regarding the proposed • project, and partly on our previous experience with similar soil conditions and projects of similar scope. Our study has been performed in accordance with the I I I • Project No. 03-1106G5 Schmidt . 03/18/03 Page 14 1650 Chestnut Avenue • minimum standards of care exercised by other professional geotechnical consultants currently practicing in the same locality. We do not, however, guarantee the performance of the proposed project in any respect, and no I warranties of any kind, expressed or implied, are made or intended in _ connection with the study performed by our firm. _ 4. The findings and recommendations contained in this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of the property could occur I with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or due to man • made actions on the subject and/or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from | legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this • report may be invalidated, wholly or partially, by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review by our firm and should not be relied J upon after a period of two years. I Figure Nos. 1 to 5, inclusive, and Appendices I and II are parts of this report. I I I I I I I I I I I I I SITE LOCATION MAP 3ROJECT NO .03-1106G5 FIGURE NO.l I 1. »111 m An.no- 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 iCN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! r I * w—tme 1 — 2 D > — ••• /*, / <'/'3DN3AV ifiNisaHo ^0 r^ i8c^JPROPOSEDRESIDENCE*i L£* *s 60.0CT 125.001LOCATION OFBORINGIMATE LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BOR& £^S Oill ^uu 5 LU Q_ •Se ^ S I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING LOG SHEET BORING NO. 1 FT. DESCRIPTION SOIL TYPE -/ . f t • • 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dark brown, moist, loose (topsoil) Light brown, moist, damp (D medium dense FINE SAND (SP) FINE SAND (SP) 13* 15* 12* 19* 25* BOTTOM OF BORING (No refusal) dense formational soil) LEGEND c * ' " Indicates representative sample ~ Indicates blowcount/lOcm/Triggs penetrometer Granular 0 5 11 31 51 Project No. 03-1 Very loose Loose Medium dense Dense Very dense 106G5 Cohesive 0 2 5 9 16 31 Very soft Soft Medium dense Stiff Very stiff Hard . Figure No. 3 I •I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING LOG SHEET BORING NO. 2 FT.DESCRIPTION SOIL TYPE •c ' ' 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dark brown, dry, loose (Topsoil) Light brown, moist, medium dense FINE SAND (SP) FINE SAND (SP) 12* 16* 25* 22* BOTTOM OF BORING (No refusal) Project No. 03-1106G5 Figure No. 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BORING LOG SHEET BORING NO. 3 FT.DESCRIPTION SOIL TYPE ~~ f - r f' - s • 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dark brown, dry, loose (Topsoil) Light brown, moist, medium dense © FINE SAND (SP) FINE SAND (SP) 10* 17* 21* 23* BOTTOM OF BORING (No refusal) Project No. 03-1106G5 Figure No. 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX I GENERAL GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS 1.0 General 1.1 These recommended grading and earthwork specifications are intended to be a part of and to supplement the Geotechnical Report(s). In the event of a conflict, the recommendations of the Geotechnical Report(s) will supercede these specifications. Observations during the course of earthwork operations may result in additional, new or revised recommendations that could supercede these specifications and/or the recommendations in the Geotechnical Report(s). 1.2 The Owner or his authorized representative shall procure the services of a qualified Geotechnical Consulting Firm, hereinafter to be referred to as the "Geotechnical Consultant" (often the same entity that produced the Geotechnical Report(s)). 1.3 The Geotechnical Consultant shall be given a schedule of work by the Earthwork Contractor for the subject project, so as to be able to perform required observations; testing and mapping of work in progress in a timely manner. 1.4 The work herein includes all activities from clearing and grubbing through fine grading. Included are trenching, excavating, backfilling, compacting and grading. All work shall be as shown on the approved project drawings. 1.5 The Geotechnical Consultant or a qualified representative shall be present on site as required, to observe, map and document the subsurface exposures so as to verify the geotechnical design suppositions. In the event that observed conditions are found to be significantly different from the interpreted conditions during the design phase, the Geotechnical Consultant shall notify the Owner, recommend appropriate changes in the design to suite the observed conditions and notify the agenc(ies) having jurisdiction, where required. Subsurface areas to be geotechnically observed, mapped, record elevations or tested include cleared natural ground for receiving fill or structures, "remedial removal" areas, key bottoms and benches. I *I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX I Page 2 1.6 The guidelines contained herein and any standard details attached herewith represent this firm's recommendations for the grading and all associated operations on the subject project. These guidelines shall be considered to be a part of these Specifications. 1.7 If interpretation of these guidelines or standard details result in a dispute(s), the Geotechnical Consultant shall conclude the appropriate interpretation. 1.8 The Geotechnical Consultant shall observe the processing of subgrade and fill materials and perform the required compaction testing. The test results shall be provided to the Owner and the Contractor and if so required, to the agenc(ies) having jurisdiction. 1.9 The Geotechnical Consultant shall not provide "supervision" or any "direction" of work in progress to the Earthwork Contractor, or to any of the Contractor's employees or to any of the Contractor's agents. 1.10 The Earthwork Contractor: The Earthwork Contractor (contractor) shall be qualified, experienced, and knowledgeable in earthwork logistics, preparation and processing of ground to receive fill, moisture-conditioning and processing of fill, and compacting fill. The Contractor shall review and accept the plans, geotechnical report(s), and these Specifications prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for performing the grading in accordance with the plans and specifications. The Contractor shall prepare and submit to the Owner and the Geotechnical Consultant a work plan that indicates the sequence of earthwork grading, the number of "spreads" of work and the estimated quantities of daily earthwork contemplated for the site prior to commencement of grading. The Contractor shall inform the Owner and the Geotechnical Consultant of changes in work schedules and updates to the work plan at least 24 hours in advance of such changes so that appropriate observations and tests can be planned and accomplished. The Contractor shall not assume that the Geotechnical Consultant is aware of all grading operations. The Contractor shall have the sole responsibility to provide adequate equipment and methods to accomplish the earthwork in accordance with the applicable grading codes and agency ordinances, these Specifications, and the recommendations in the approved geotechnical report(s) and grading I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX I Page 3 plan(s). If, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Consultant, unsatisfactory conditions, such as unsuitable soils, improper moisture conditions, inadequate compaction, insufficient buttress key size, adverse weather, etc. are resulting in a qualify of work less than required in these specifications, the Geotechnical Consultant shall reject the work and may recommend to the Owner that construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified. 2.0 Preparation of Areas to be Filled 2.1 Clearing and grubbing : vegetation, such as brush, grass, roots, and other deleterious material shall be sufficiently removed and properly disposed of in a method acceptable to the Owner, governing agencies, and the Geotechnical Consultant. The Geotechnical Consultant shall evaluate the extent of these removals depending on specific site conditions. Earth fill material shall not contain more than 1 percent of organic materials (by volume). No fill lifts shall contain more than 5 percent of organic matter. Nesting of the organic materials shall not be allowed. If potentially hazardous materials are encountered, the Contractor shall stop work in the affected area, and a hazardous material specialist shall be informed immediately for proper evaluation and handling of these materials prior to continuing to work in that area. As presently defined by the State of California, most refined petroleum products (gasoline, diesel fuel, motor oil, grease, coolant, etc.) have chemical constituents that are considered to be hazardous waste. As such, the indiscriminate dumping or spillage of these fluids onto the ground may constitute a misdemeanor, punishable by fines and/or imprisonment, and shall not be allowed. Materials used for fill, either imported or on-site, shall not contain hazardous materials as defined by the California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 4, Chapter 30, Article 9 and 10; 40CRF; and any other applicable local, state or federal laws. The Consultant shall not be responsible for the identification or analysis of the potential presence of hazardous materials. However, if observations, odors or soil discoloration cause Consultant to suspect the presence of hazardous materials, the Consultant may request from the Owner the termination of grading operations within the affected area. Prior to resuming grading operations, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX I Page 4 the Owner shall provide a written report to the Consultant indicating that the suspected materials are not hazardous as defined by applicable laws and regulations. 2.2 Any asphaltic pavement material removed during clearing operations should be properly disposed of at an approved off-site facility. Concrete fragments which are free of reinforcing steel may be placed in fills, provided that they are placed in accordance with Section 3.2 of this document. 2.3 During grading, soil or groundwater conditions other than those identified in the Geotechncal Report may be encountered by the Contractor. The Consultant shall be notified immediately to evaluate the significance of the unanticipated condition. 2.4 Processing : Existing ground that has been declared satisfactory for support of fill by the Geotechnical Consultant shall be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Existing ground that is not satisfactory shall be overexcavated as specified in the following section. Scarification shall continue until soils are broken down and free of large clay lumps or clods and the working surface is reasonably uniform, flat, and free of uneven features that would inhibit uniform compaction. 2.5 Over-excavation : In addition to removals and over-excavations recommended in the approved geotechnical report(s) and the grading plan, soft, loose, dry, saturated, spongy, organic-rich highly fractured or otherwise unsuitable ground shall be over-excavated to competent ground as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant during grading. 2.6 Benching : Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5 : 1 (horizontal : vertical), the ground shall be stepped or benched. Please see the Standard Details for a graphic illustration. The lowest bench or key shall be a minimum of 15 feet wide and at least 2 feet deep, into competent material as evaluated by the Geotechnical Consultant. Other benches shall be excavated a minimum height of 4 feet into competent material or as otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant. Fill placed on ground sloping flatter than 5 : 1 (horizontal : vertical) shall also be benched or otherwise over-excavated to provide a flat subgrade for the fill. 2.7 Evaluation/Acceptance of Fill Areas : All areas to receive fill, including removal and processed areas, key bottoms, and benches, shall be observed, APPENDIX I Page 6 4.2 Fill Moisture Conditioning : Fill soils shall be watered, dried back, blended, and/or mixed, as necessary to attain a relatively uniform moisture content at or slightly over optimum. Maximum density and optimum soil moisture content tests shall be performed in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM Test Method D1557). 4.3 Compaction of Fill : After each layer has been moisture-conditioned, mixed and evenly spread, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum dry density (ASTM D1557). Compaction equipment shall be adequately sized and be either specifically designed for soil compaction or of proven reliability to efficiently achieve the specified level of compaction with uniformity. 4.4 Compaction of Fill Slopes : In addition to normal compaction procedures specified above, compaction of slopes shall be accomplished by backrolling of slopes with sheepsfoot rollers at increments of 3 to 4 feet in fill elevation, or by other methods producing satisfactory results acceptable to the Geotechnical Consultant. Upon completion of grading, relative compaction of the fill, out to the slope face, shall be at least 90 percent of maximum dry density per ASTM Test Method Dl 557. 4.5 Compaction Testing : Field tests for moisture content and relative compaction of the fill soils shall be performed by the Geotechnical Consultant. Location and frequency of tests shall be at the Consultant's discretion based on field conditions encountered. Compaction test locations will not necessarily be selected on a random basis. Test locations shall be selected to verify adequacy of compaction levels in areas that are judged to be prone to inadequate compaction (such as close to slope faces and at the fill/bedrock benches). 4.6 Frequency of Compaction Testing : Tests shall be taken at intervals not exceeding 2 feet in vertical rise and/or 1,000 cubic yards of compacted fill soils embankment. In addition as a guideline, at least one test shall be taken on slope faces for each 5,000 square feet of slope face and/or each 10 feet of vertical height of slope. The Contractor shall assure that fill construction is such that the testing schedule can be accomplished by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall stop or slow down the earthwork construction if these minimum standards are not met. 4.7 Compaction Test Locations : The Geotechnical Consultant shall document the approximate elevation and horizontal coordinates of each test location. The Contractor shall coordinate with the project surveyor to assure that I I I • APPENDIX I Page 8 7.3 The jetting of the bedding around the conduits shall be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant. 7.4 The Geotechnical Consultant shall test the trench backfill for relative — compaction. At least one test should be made for every 300 feet of trench I and 2 feet of fill. 1 7.5 Lift thickness of trench backfill shall not exceed those allowed in the Standard Specifications of Public Works Construction unless the Contractor can demonstrate to the Geotechnical Consultant that the fill lift I can be compacted to the minimum relative compaction by his alternative equipment and method. I I I I I I I I I I I Project No. 03-11 06G5 Schmidt . 03/18/03 1650 Chestnut Avenue " APPENDIX II • Laboratory Test Results (Cont'nd) 3. The sulfate content of the soils were determined in accordance with _ EPA 9038. The results are presented below : I Sulfate Soil Content M Description (ppm) • Boring #2 Light brown fine sand 428 Moderate Sample #1 (SP) Depth 4.0' I I I I I I I I I CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: RESIDENTIAL Page 1 CF-1R Date..02/27/03 11:44:57 Documentation Author. ******* *v6.01******** Project Title SCHMIDT ACCESSORY UNIT Project Address 1650 CHESTNUT CARLSBAD, CA RON MOORE Ron Mpore Title 24 Energy Calcs. 4152 Chasin Street Oceanside, CA 92056 760-806-1026 Climate Zone 07 Compliance Method MICROPAS6 v6.01 for 2001 Standards by Enercomp, Inc. MICROPAS6 v6.0l File-SCHMIDT Wth-CTZ07S92 Program-FORM CF-1R User#-MP1315 User-Ron Moore Title 24 Energy Run-SCHMIDT Building Permit # Plan Check / Date Field Check/ Date GENERAL INFORMATION Conditioned Floor Area ..... Building Type ........ ...... Construction Type ......... Building Front Orientation. Number of Dwelling Units. . . Number of Stories .......... Floor Construction Type.... Glazing Percentage ......... Average Glazing U-factor... Average Glazing SHGC ....... Average Ceiling Height ..... 640 sf Single Family Detached New Front Facing 152 deg 1 1 Raised Floor 22.1 % of floor area 0.59 Btu/hr-sf-F 0.67 8 ft BUILDING SHELL INSULATION Component Type Wall ROOf ROOf Door FloorExt Frame Type Wood Wood Wood None Wood Cavity R-value R-13 R-30 R-19 R-0 R-19 Sheathing Total R-value R-value R-0 R-0 R-0 R-0 R-0 R-13 R-30 R-19 R-0 R-19 Assembly U-factor Location/Comments 0.088 R-13 BAIT 0.039 Vented/R-30BAT 0.051 Unvented/R-19B 0.330 Solid Wood 0.048 Over Garage FENESTRATION Orientation Area (sf) U- Factor SHGC Exterior Shading Over- hang/ Fins Location/ Comments Wind Front (SE) 52.0 0.600 Door Front (SE) 17.7 0.550 Wind Back (NW) 12.0 0.600 Wind Right (NE) 36.0 0.600 Wind Left (SW) 24.X) 0.600 0.670 Standard Yes 0.650 Standard Yes 0.670 Standard Yes 0.670 Standard Yes 0.670 Standard Yes DUAL Vinyl/Wood DUAL Vin./Wd. Dr. DUAL Vinyl/Wood DUAL Vinyl/Wood DUAL Vinyl/Wood f City of Carlsbad Building Department CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: ^fJlWHaT J^ —UU^I/IMfy U-lAll Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name(s): Project Description: BUILDING TYPE: Residential:Number of New Dwelling Units Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SOU ~w Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/Industrial: City Certification of applicant's information: Square Feet Floor Area Date: SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad Unified School District 801 Pine Ave. Carlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) San Marcos Unified Schoo! District 215MataWay San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/ developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to signx>Bibehalf of the Owner. Signature:JIS Date: CHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION 7 (To be completed by the school district(s)) 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (76O) 602-2700 • FAX (76O) 602-856O THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT , HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE fertsb3dnUnjf[pd School District farfciiatf, California Q2QQ8— NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT f ,,,, ,^mQ DATE 7 ' PHONE NUMBER R»uie0H d/17/nn MetroScan /San Diego (CA) Owner CoOwner Site Mail Xfered Price Loan Ami VestType Lender Land Use Bldg Use Zoning Plat MapNumb Legal Census Bedrooms Bathrooms Pool Schmidt Kendall K 1650 Chestnut Ave Carlsbad 92008 1650 Chestnut Ave Carlsbad Ca 92008 08/30/2000 Doc # : 465919 Deed : Quit Claim Loan : IntTy : 111 Res,Single Family Residence ""unknown Building Use* 1 R-l , Single Family Residential THUM LANDS 001681 THUM LANDS FOR TCT 244 Tract : 178.01 Block : 2 2 View None Acres 1.00 Garage Sp LotSqFt No Units 1 Stories Parcel Land Struct Other Total Exempt Type %Imprv % Owned TaxArea MapGrid 02-03 Tx Phone Owner Tenant .17 7,500 : 205 130 25 00 : $117,351 : $46,938 : $164,289 : $7,000 : Homeowners :29 :0 : 09000 : 1106G5 : $1,711.54 : 442-434-1377 ; BldgSqFt : 1,064 Year Built : 1938 205-13 c ILK /ft IA OLD 'jrlfn 1 9**41 r J £>4U 7 VICES ICW M-M .7-71 TZ»7]m >f-77M+t » ftft 09 ft to •B ¥ CUT •«• U |jfri» J**°ata a& r MtPIZOSO- CAPLSBfiD TCT NO 84-28 MAP 58% .- SANDALIOOO DALE UNIT NO 2 MAP 5757 - SANDALHOQO DALE MAP 1681 - THUM LINOS - POR TCT 244 AUG 0 5 200? Information compiled from various sources. Real Estate Solutions makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of information contained in this report. FlteNo: 01103321 19136 Exhibit "A" All that certain real property situated In the County of San Diego, State of California, described as follows: All that portion of Tract 244, Thurn Lands, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1681, filed fn the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, December 9, 1915, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the center line of Valley Street: and the center line of Chestnut Avenue as shown on said Map; Thence along the center line of said Chestnut Avenue South 61°21' West 293.36 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence leaving the center line of said Chestnut Avenue North 28°39' West 155.00 feet; Thence North 61°21' East 120.00 feet; Thence South 28°39' East 155.00 feet to the center line of said Chestnut Avenue; Thence along the center line of said Chestnut Avenue South 61°21' West 120.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning. Excepting therefrom the Southeasterly thirty (30) feet of roadway purposes. Also, expecting the Southwesterly 60 feet thereof. Assessor's Parcel Number: 20^-130-25-00 CLTA Preliminary Report Form (Rev 1/1/95)