The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2711 HAYMAR DR; ; CB941607; PermitB U I L f' I N G P E Paae 1 of 1 Job Address: 2711 HAYMAR DR Permit Type: COMMERCIAL BUILDING Parcel No: Valuation: 143,600 Construction Type: VN Reference* 0 SF PRO SHOP AND 1000 SF : STORAGE BUILDING ApPl/Ownr: HUFFMANN, MARTIN 1 ~ 19U1 LINCOLN STREET OCEANSIDE, CA. RMIT uite; Permit No: CB"-*4 1 t.n Project No: A940237 Status: ISSUED Applied: 12/07/94 Apr/1 s s ue : 0 4 /1 3 /'} 5 Entered 3y = Mr.'P 619 433-2607 *** Fees Requirec Fees ; Adjustments: Total Fees: 2 i , J^jjjtfC ' V ; description Building Permit plan Check *** Strong Motion Fee Enter Number >->f ££ Enter "' Y" to Autoc (PFf>-X^VD- A BUILDING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Plumbing Each Plumbing Fixture or Each Building Sewer Each Vacuum Breaker * PLUMBING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Electric issue Fee > Three Phase Per AMP * ELECTRICAL TOTAL Enter 'V for Mechanical Issue Fee> Install Furn/Ducts/Heat Pumps > * MECHANICAL TOTAL PLDA A ected & Credits 7.00 15.0 U 7 . U 0 600 1 3 . 5 0' 9 . 0 0 ! NSP. CLEARANCE APPROVAL DATE , U 0 516 . t>0 2 0 ,907.0 0 Ext fee Data 794 G16 30 4752 2 6 I 4 2412 2298. 2122. G T. 3 6 . 2 0 . 3 5. 15. 7 . 77. 10. 300 310 15 9 24 5474 00 00 00 00 0 U .00 00 0 0 00 oo 00 00 00 00 0 0 . 00 0001 01 C-PRMT 02 20907-00 CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 BUILDING 08/09/95 07:52 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2711 HAYMAR. DR Permit Type: COMMERCIAL BUILDING Parcel No: Valuation: 143,600 Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: Reference*: Description: 3200 SF PRO SHOP AND 1000 SF : STORAGE BUILDING Appl/Ownr: HUFFMANN, MARTIN 1901 LINCOLN STREET OCEANSIDE, CA. P E R M I Suite Lot#: Permit No: CB941607 Project No: A9402373 Development No: Status: ISSUED Applied: 12/07/94 Apr/Issue: 04/13/95 Entered By: MDP 619 433-2607 *** Fees Required 21, 2 Fee description ** Fees : Adjustments: Total Fees: ected & Credits *** Building Permit Plan Check Strong Motion Fee g Enter Number of Enter "Y" to (P * BUILDING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Plumbing Each Plumbing Fixture or " Each Building Sewer Each Vacuum Breaker * PLUMBING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Electric Issue Fee > Three Phase Per AMP > Enter "Y" if Test Meter > * ELECTRICAL TOTAL Enter 'Y' for Mechanical Issue Fee> Install Furn/Ducts/Heat Pumps > * MECHANICAL TOTAL PLDA A > 600 1 3.50 it^V; 21,423 »#«$< V 2 5 S ff/f&p'l'h Pvi" f^ / N^ynkfjpr \f LjA \+ A- ' "*V^; 794 -**• ^f*; 516 'f. '•;/""."/"* 3 0 ^ **-*£"' 4752"'?*'?V 261*'-;<'*-•* 2412 C-^Vjf 2298 *;Vf.T 2122 •*;*' 15538 20 7.00 35 15.00 15 7.00 7 77 10 .50 300 25 335 15 9.00 9 24 5474 .00 .00 .00 ee .00 .00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 . 00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 . 00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 1 Data Y Y Y Y Y L 3084 08/09/95 0001 Oi C-PRHT CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 PfikMI^APPLICATION * ——1City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las PaIwas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 i. FEKMTI TYPE From List 1 (see back) give code of Permit-Type: For Residential Projects Only: From List 2 (see back) give Code of Structure-Type: Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units 2. PROJECT INFORMATION PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL PLAN CK DEPOSIT. VALID. BY ~_ DATE ^l& - 9863 12/07/94 OOOi 01 02 C-PRMT 516-00 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Building or Suite No. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot No.Subdivision Name/Number Jmt No.Phase No. CHECK BELOW IF SUBM1 TIED: Energy Calcs fe(2 Structural Calcs D 2 Soils Report D1 Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL EXISTING USE .PROPOSED USE DESCRIPTION OF WORK SQ. FT.^2gQ s-.-g* y * OF STORIES /# OF BEDROOMS # OF BATHROOMS UJH i AUI ratfSUN uierent rrom applicant) " NAME (last name first) J-t U F PA* NM H49/CTVO • ADDRESS i- STATE e^/4. ZIP CODE ST. DAY TELEPHONE ^gg-^S^/n]4. APPLICANT JffCONlKACrOR LJ AGENT NAME (last name first) JJ<J FF MA XJ ' R CONTRACTOR ADDRESS OWNER DACitNl i-OR OWWbK CITY STATEQ./^. ZIPCODE DAY TELEPHONE / 5. PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS r. SiD<&- STATE c/0* ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE 6. CONTRACTC NAME (last name first) CITY ADDRESS STATE STATE LIC. # ZIP CODE LICENSE CLASS DAY TELEPHONE CITY BUSINESS LIC. # NAME [last name first) £2. C/Oj (ZJ<C. 7. WO. ADDRESS •'7 3 <? DAY TELEPHONE C.^ U IC7T~" Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby amrm tnat I have a certificate of consent to selt-insure issued by the Director ol Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of die insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. C). INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO.EXPIRATION DATE Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, 1 snail not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE 8. OWNER-BUILDEK DECLARATION Owner-Builder Declaration: 1 hereby atrirm that I am exempt rrom tne Lontractors License Law tor tne roiiowing reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, die owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to die of die Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or tate is exempt therefrom, and the basis for die alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit 'the applicant to a civil penalty of not more dian five hundred dollars [$500]). DATE -7 COMP ILDING PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES D NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? O YES D NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of die outer boundary of a school site? D YES D NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1,1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT 9. cuHb'mucnuN LENDING AGENCY ITiereby attirm that there is a construction lending agency for the pertormance ot the work tor whlcn this permit is issued (Sec 3097(1) civil (Jodej. LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS JO. APPLICANT T certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply witn all City ordinances andstate laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of die City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAWST AU. UABOJTIES, JITOGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CTTY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over S'O" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Every permit issued by the Building Official under die provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303 (d) Uniform Building DATE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance O DEPT: BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING WSKB PLANNING U/H PLAN CHECKf: CB941607 PERMIT!: CB941607 PROJECT NAME: 3200 SF PRO SHOP AND 1000 SF STORAGE BUILDING WATER DATE: 09/25/95 PERMIT TYPE: COM ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSON/PHONE!: RS/DAVE/720-4653 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: DEPT: BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/ PLAN CHECK*: CB941607 PERMITf: CB941607 PROJECT NAME: 3200 SF PRO SHOP AND 1000 SF STORAGE BUILDING ADDRESS: 2711 HAYMAR DR CONTACT PERS ON/ PHONE # : RS/ DAVE/ 720-465 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: WATER DATE: 09/25/95 PERMIT TYPE: COM INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: DATE INSPECTED; DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED! APPROVED APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE KAMWtfG U/M WATER AN CHECK*: CB941607 DATE: 09/25/95 jrrlRMIT*: CB941607 PERMIT TYPE: COMPROJECT NAME: 3200 SF PRO SHOP AND 1000 SFSTORAGE BUILDING ADDRESS: 1711 HAYMAR DR CONTACT PERSON/PHONE*: RS/DAVE/720-4653SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: " DATE BY: Z_-n INSPECTED: I hS?-*" APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: _ INSPECTED: _ APPROVED _ DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY : INSPECTED : APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: ll-lf <fo C)AJL A/'C"7 I> DEFT: BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/H PLAN CHECK*: CB941607 PERMIT*: CB941607 PROJECT NAME: 3200 SF PRO SHOP AND 1000 SF WATER DATE: 09/25/95 PERMIT TYPE: COM STORAGE ADDRESS: 2711 HAYMAR CONTACT PERSON/PHONE*: CFWFR nTQT" INSPECTED, J fl ' BY: Til \JAsVW'-' l^_ \/ 3 INSPECTED/ / /I BY: ffY tfJ^OvV V^*2T INSPECTED BY: COMMENTS : /^- ^+f BUILDING DR RS/DAVE/720-4653 WATFR FIT <5T • DATE y y INSPECTED: 5/^7^ APPROVED ' ' |DATE i ~ 1 INSPECTED: ll/3y/0* APPROVED J DATE INSPECTED : APPROVED ^A-t- llrv.f>^OV/J^u^^-V5 uv SEP 2 5 I9S5 : cFfV" OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DISAPPROVED ^L X DISAPPROVED~^v. DISAPPROVED j I ^- r^*;1 i<J3 DEPT: BUILDING FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M PLAN CHECK!: CB941607 PERHITf: CB941607PROJECT NAME: 3200 SF PRO SHOP AND 1000 SFSTORAGE BUILDING ADDRESS: 2711 HAYMAR DR CONTACT PERSON/PHONE*: RS/DAVE/720-4653SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: WATER DATE: 09/25/95 PERMIT TYPE: CO SEP 25 CITY OF CARLSBAD FNRINEERING DEPARTMENT INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: INSPECTED BY: , DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: DATE INSPECTED: 1C APPROVED APPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: 1V05/9.5 INSPECTION HISTORY LISTING FOR PERMIT* CB941607 DATE INSPECTION TYPE 11/29/95 Final Combo 11/29/95 Final Combo 10/11/95 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel 10/11/95 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel 10/11/95 Final Combo 09/25/95 Final Combo 09/25/95 Final Combo 08/09/95 Rough Electric 08/08/95 Rough Electric 08/08/95 Rough Electric Of/27/95 Final Electrical 07/27/95 Final Electrical 07/06/95 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel 07/06/95 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel 07/06/95 Rough Electric 06/19/95 Shear Panels/HD's 06/19/95 Shear Panels/HD's 06/19/95 Roof/Reroof 06/19/95 ROOf/Reroof 06/16/95 Shear Panels/HD's 06/16/95 Shear Panels/HD's 06/16/95 Roof/Reroof 06/16/95 Roof/Reroof 06/13/95 Interior Lath/Drywall 06/13/95 Interior Lath/Drywall 06/09/95 Insulation 06/09/95 Insulation 06/06/95 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wei 06/06/95 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel 06/06/95 Rough/Topout 06/06/95 Rough Electric 06/06/95 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 05/31/95 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel 05/31/95 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Wel 05/31/95 Rough/Topout 05/31/95 Rough Electric 05/31/95 Rough/Ducts/Dampers 05/26/95 ROOf/Reroof 05/26/95 ROOf/Reroof 05/25/95 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 05/25/95 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 05/25/95 Underground/Under Floor 05/25/95 Underground/Under Floor 05/25/95 Sewer/Water Service 04/24/95 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 04/24/95 Ftg/Foundation/Piers 04/24/95 Underground/Conduit-Wir 04/14/95 Underground/Under Floor 04/14/95 Underground/Under Floor 04/14/95 Underground/Conduit-Wir 04/14/95 Underground/Conduit-Wir INSP ACT COMMENTS RI TP RI TP TP RI PK TP RI TP RI PK RI TP TP RI TP RI TP RI PD RI PD RI TP RI TP RI TP TP TP TP RI TP TP TP TP RI TP RI TP RI TP TP RI TP TP RI TP RI TP RI AP RIwe PI RI NR AP RI NS RI CO RI AP AP RI AP RI AP RI CO RI CO RI AP RI AP RI AP AP AP AP RI PA AP AP CO RI AP RI AP RI AP AP RI AP AP RI AP RIwe MW/DENNIS BJN/MARTIN/720-4653 FINAL PRE-WALK RS/DAVE/720-4653 REVIEWED FINAL PROCESS W/SUP TEST METER MW/MARTIN/720-4653. MW/DAVE/720-4653 RS/DAVE/720-4653 MAINT BLDG WALLS/CEILING MAINT BLDG RS/DAVE/720-4653 OK TO WRAP RS/DAVE/720-4653 MW/DAVE/720-4653 MW/DAVE/720-4653 MW/DAVE/720-4653 MW/DAVE/720-4653 17 & 11 MW/DAVE/720-4653 LOAD CALCS/HVAC 6TRUSS ATTCH MW/DAVE/720-4653 OK TO WRAP ND AS BUILT/VENTING WALLS HVAC SUPP « TRUSS MW/DAVE/720-4653 MW/DAVE/720-4653 MAINT BLDG/SOILS I/HI ATTCH2 MW/DAVE/720-4653 U/G CONDUIT TO MAINT BLDG 1 1/2 WATER MAIN U/G RS/DAVE/940-1159 PDNING SOILS LETTER UFER CRN MW/DAVE/940-1159 MW/DAVE/940-1159 HIT <RETURN> TO CONTINUE... CITY OF CARLSBAD NOTICE \ BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE. 436-3550 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE TIME. LOCATION.t?7// PERMIT NO. -*, <£<*"* , ,#**"&&-* ••£.. *s /4 >fe>g FOR INSPECTION CALL 438-3101. RE-INSPECTION FEE DUE? | j YES / I FOR FURTHER INFORMA06N, CONTACT PHONE BUILDING 1NSP6 CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: March 8, 1995 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 94-1607 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2711 Hay mar Dr. PROJECT NAME: Pro Shop/Storage Shed SET: IV Q APPLICANT J PLAN REVIEWER a FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone*: REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Esgil Corporationn GA n CM D log Enclosures: trnsmtl.dot ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: March 2, 1995 a APPLICANT i-~r,r\\f~^ JURISDICTION: Carlsbad a PLAN REVIEWER G FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 94-1607 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 2711 Haymar Dr. PROJECT NAME: Pro Shop/Storage Shed The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Tom Clark P.O. Box 903 Del Mar 92014 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Designer Date contacted: 3/2/95 (by: ga) Telephone #: REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation [X] GA n CM Q PC 2/23/95 trnsmtl.dot Carlsbad 94-16O7 III March 2, 1995 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION; Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2711 Haymar Dr. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 2/23/95 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 94-1607 SET: III DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: March 2, 1995 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 94-1607 III March 2, 1995 PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS JURISDICTION: Carlsbad DATE: 3/2/95 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: 94-1607 SET: III PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek I. Correct the water line sizing calculations. The flush valve urinal requires at least 15 psi to operate, not 8 psi as used for water closets. The urinal requires at least a 1 inch minimum water line. The building main must be at least a 1-1/4 inch minimum, not 1 inch. I1. The truss web layout in Section B on Sheet 4 of 9 do not match the truss calculations and drawings. It looks as if the HVAC unit will not fit into the truss space between webs. Please correct. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: January 2O, 1995 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 94-1607 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2711 Haymar Dr. PROJECT NAME: Pro Shop/Storage Shed The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Tom Clark P.O. Box 903 Del Mar 92014 X Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation GA CM PC 1/10/95 trnsmtl.dot Carlsbad 94-1607 II January 20, 1995 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2711 Haymar Dr. DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/10/95 REVIEWED BY: Kurt Culver PLAN CHECK NO.: 94-1607 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: January 20, 1995 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. B. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. C. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. D. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? QYes QNo Carlsbad 94-1607 II January 2O, 1995 9. Clearly show that the shed is at least 20' away from the southeast property line, or provide a 1 hour wall there. 18. Show the attic access at the storage building. 20. Provide the letter from the soils engineer stating that he has reviewed the foundation plans for THIS project. 21. Provide the note on the plans as previously requested. 39. See below for outstanding PME corrections. NOTE: The plans you resubmitted were very faint. Provide darker copies. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS JURISDICTION: Carlsbad DATE: 1/20/95 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: 94-1607 SET: II PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek I. Provide complete water line sizing calculations, including the water pressure, pressure losses, water demands, and developed pipe lengths. The Water Line Calculations on sheet 6 of 9 are incomplete and incorrect. Missing are the losses for elevation, required pressure for fixtures (flush tank or flush valve water closet, water demands), Allowed friction loss per 100 feet is not shown, and the method used does not follow UPC, Appendix A or Table 10-2. Please correct. Piping looks under sized. 3. The total vent areas are undersized as per UPC, Section 504. Please correct drain, waste, and vent plans. 7. The drain from P & T valve can not run up into the ceiling space. The drain line must slope down to drain from the P & T valve to discharge point, (do not trap). Please correct. II. In Section B on sheet 4 of 9 detail 30 x 30 inch access clearance through the truss webs. UMC, Section 708. Correct the truss web design in section to match the engineered truss design provided. The required access clearances may not fit. Please correct. Carlsbad 94-1607 II January 20, 1995 17. The R-19 roof insulation will not fit in 2 x 4 bottom cord space under HVAC platform and drywall ceiling. Please correct. Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW JURISDICTION: Carlsbad DATE: 1/20/95 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER : 941607 II PLAN REVIEWER: ChuckMendenhall 1. Submit complete service and feeder one line diagram the manufacturers standard switchboard drawings do not qualify. NEC 215-5. 2. Show or note on the plans the method used to limit fault currents to 10,000 amps on branch circuits. Show the fuse letters if used to limit fault current (i.e., JJN, AST, LPN). Also note on the plans that circuit breakers used in the subpanels will be listed for series combination with the current limiting main fuses or circuit breakers. 3. Show fuse/circuit breaker sizes on the single line diagram. NEC 240-6. 4. Show on the single line diagram the conduit and wire sizes. 5. Specify the wire type (AL or CU) and insulation (i.e. THWN). NEC 310. 6. Show the grounding system required for each building, structure, or service. NEC 250-24,80(a), 81 (c). 7. Show the grounding electrode conductor size and wire type (AL/CU). NEC 250-94. 8. Specify the wiring method you intend to use for this project (i.e., EMT, Metal Flex, NMC etc). 9. Show on the plan the location of the service(s) NEC 110-16, 230-2. 10. Show the location of all panels, load centers, switchboards, and transformers. NEC 110-16,240-24,300-21. 11. Provide the required working space about electrical equipment. NEC 110-16. Carlsbad 94-1607 II January 20, 1995 12. Submit complete panel schedule(s). 13. Provide receptacle(s) within 25 feet of HVAC equipment. UMC 509. 14. Show exit signs on the lighting plan(s) at all required exits and specify them as being self-luminous or having a second source of power ( battery or generator). This is required when two exits are required per the UBC. UBC 3314 and NEC 700- 16. Note: If you have any questions regarding this electrical plan review list please contact the plan reviewer listed above at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. BSGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 DATE: December 14, 1994 a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 94-16O7 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2711 Haymar Dr. PROJECT NAME: Pro Shop/Storage Shed The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Martin-Htiffmafj- 4904 -Lmcota- St. Oceanside-92054- TOM CLARK, P.O. BOX 903, DEL MAR CA 92014 X Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone*: REMARKS: By: Kurt Culver Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D CM D PC 12/8 trnsmtl.dot Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST COMMERCIAL PLAN CHECK NO.: 94-1607 OCCUPANCY: B-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA: 8000 (basic) SPRINKLERS?: Yes (as noted) REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 12/7/94 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: December 14, 1994 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad USE: Re tail/Storage ACTUAL AREA: Pro=32OO Stor.=10OO STORIES: 1 HEIGHT: -12' OCCUPANT LOAD: Pro=~80; Sto.=3 DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/8/94 PLAN REVIEWER: Kurt Culver FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Code sections cited are based on the 1991 UBC. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 22, GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITHOUT ENERGY OR POLICY SUPPLEMENTS (1991 UBC) comforw.dot Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 • GENERAL 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123, (619)560-1468. 2. Provide the names, addresses and telephone numbers of the owner and the responsible design professionals on the Title Sheet. 3. All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the California licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. Please include the California license number, seal, date of license expiration and the date the plans are signed. Business and Professions Code. 4. Provide a Building Code Data Legend on the Title Sheet. Include the following code information for each building proposed: Occupancy Group Description of Use Type of Construction Sprinklers: Yes or No Stories Height Floor Area 5. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and 1991 UBC, UMC and UPC and 1990 NEC. 6. Provide a note on the plans indicating if any hazardous materials will be stored and/or used within the building which exceed the quantities listed in UBC Tables 9-A and 9-B. FERTILIZERS, ETC. ARE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. • SITE PLAN 7. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show north arrow, property lines, easements, streets, existing and proposed buildings and structures. 8. Provide a statement on the site plan stating: "All property lines, easements and buildings, both existing and proposed, are shown on this site plan". 9. Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, street centerlines, and from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan. Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 • EXITS 10. In areas where the occupant load exceeds 30, two exits are required. See the retail space. Table 33-A. 11. Exits should have a minimum separation of one-half the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building or area served. Section 3303 (c). 12. Exit doors should swing in the direction of egress when serving an occupant load of 50 or more or when serving any hazardous area. Section 3304 (b). EACH LEAF AT THE 6' DOOR MUST SWING OUTWARD. 13. Note on the plans: "All exits are to be openable from inside without the use of a key or special knowledge." In lieu of the above, in a Group B occupancy, you may note "Provide a sign on or near the exit doors reading THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS." This signage is only allowed at the main exit. Section 3304(c). 14. Exit signs are required whenever two exits are required. Show all required exit sign locations. Section 3314 (a). * GLASS AND GLAZING 15. Show safety glazing in the following locations, per Section 5406{d): a) Where the nearest edge of glazing is within a 24-inch arc of either side of a door in a closed position (unless there is an intervening wall between the door and the glazing or if the glazing is 5'-0" or higher above the walking surface). APPLIES TO THE 4030 AT THE OFFICE. • ROOFS s16C A Class C jxfof covering is required. Table 32-A. 17. "^Specify ICBO, UL or other recognized listing approval number for roof materials. 18. Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"x30", unless the maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30." Access must be provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other readily accessible location and 30" headroom clearance is required above the opening. Section 3205(a). Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 • FOUNDATION 19. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 2905. PROVIDE A COMPLETE COPY OF THE SOILS REPORT, NOT JUST THE EXCERPT ON THE PLANS. 20. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. (When required by the soil report). 21. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: a) The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, b) The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and c) The foundation excavations comply with the intent of the soils report." 22. Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Chapter 29. CLARIFY THE DISTANCE FROM THE STORAGE SHED TO THE SLOPE SHOWN AT SECTION A-1 ON ALBA'S PLANS. 23. Show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 302(d). 24. Note on the plans that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. • FRAMING 25. Provide complete structural details on the plans with cross referencing as needed to show the structural framing will comply with the design calculations and building code requirements. 26. Provide minimum structural specifications on the plans to show that all structural materials will comply with the design calculations and building code requirements. 27. Show double top plate with minimum 48" lap splice. Section 2517 (g) 2. 28. Show nailing will be in compliance with Table 25-Q. Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 29. Show stud size and spacing. Maximum allowable stud heights; bearing wall: 2 x 4 and 2 x 6 max. 10'; non-bearing: 2x4 max. 14', 2x6 max. 20'. Table 25-R-3. 30. Detail all post to beam and post to footing connections and reference the detail to the plan. Section 2516 (m). 31. Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear walls. Section 2513. 32. Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and post footings. Section 302 (d). PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE HEADERS (SOME SUPPORT POINT LOADS). 33. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify on the plans the truss identification numbers. PER CARLSBAD POLICY, THIS MUST BE DONE NOW (NO DEFERRED APPROVALS). 34. Note on the plans that "all weather-exposed surfaces shall have a weather-resistive barrier to protect the interior wall covering and that exterior openings shall be flashed in such a manner as to make them weatherproof. Section 1708. • MISCELLANEOUS 35. Provide details of restrooms to show compliance with Section 510 (b), regarding floors, walls and showers. 36. Note on the plans that new water closets and associated flushometer valves, if any, shall use no more than 1.6 gallons per flush and shall meet performance standards established by the American National Standards Institute Standard A112.19.2, and urinals and associated flushometer valves, if any, shall use no more than one gallon per flush and shall meet performance standards established by the American National Standards Institute Standard A112.19.2. H & S Code, Section 17921.3(b). • TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS 37. Provide note and details on the plans to show compliance with the enclosed Disabled Access Review List. Disabled access requirements may be more restrictive than the UBC. • ADDITIONAL 38. Provide complete electrical plans. 39. See below for energy/mechanical/plumbing corrections. Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 40. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. 41. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. • Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Q Yes Q No 42. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Kurt Culver at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. PLUMBING, MECHANICAL AND ENERGY CORRECTIONS JURISDICTION: Carlsbad DATE: 12/13/94 PLAN REVIEW NUMBER: 94-1607 SET: I PLAN REVIEWER: Glen Adamek 1. Provide water line sizing calculations, including the water pressure, pressure losses, developed pipe length, and water demands. UPC Section 1009. 2. Provide gas line plans and calculations, showing pipe lengths and gas demands. UPC Section 1219. 3. Provide drain, waste and vent plans. 4. Detail how floor drain trap seal is to be maintained. UPC Section 707 (floor drain trap priming). 5. Show water heater size, type and location on plans. UPC, Section 1301. 6. Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. UPC, Section 1310. 7. Show P & T valve on water heater and detail drain line route from P & T valve to the exterior. UPC Section 1007(e). Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 8. Show 1/4" per 12" slope on drain and waste lines. UPC Section 407. 9. Show required ventilation of the dressing room. 10. Detail overflow (secondary) condensate discharge from air conditioning units that are in a ceiling space. (UMC Section 1205) 11. Show access to the attic containing equipment to be minimum 30 inches by 30 inches. The opening may be 22 inches by 30 inches if the equipment can be removed through such opening. Section 708, UMC. 12. Note that passageway to the attic furnace shall be unobstructed and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic. Section 708, UMC. 13. Show permanent electrical outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch for furnace located in attic or underfloor space. Section 708 & 709, UMC. 14. Show minimum 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of furnace. Section 505, UMC. 15. Show the daylit areas and required daylit area lighting controls for new or relocated lighting in daylit areas. Title 24, Part 6, Section 131(c). 16. Show bi-level lighting controls as per Title 24, Part 6, Section 131(b). 17. The energy design does not match the plans. a) The plans show only about 3000 square feet of conditioned floor area. The restrooms and power room are not conditioned space. b) Show the insulation required between the conditioned space and non- conditioned space. 18. The corrected, completed and signed ENV-1, LTG-1, and MECH-1 forms must be imprinted on the plans. 19. Provide the state license numbers of persons signing the ENV-1 and MECH-1 form, (Civil Engineer or Architect?) Note: If you have any questions regarding this plan review list please contact Glen Adamek at (619) 560-1468. To speed the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where the corrected items have been addressed on the plans. Carlsbad 94-16O7 December 14, 1994 DEPARTMENT OF STATE ARCHITECTURE-NON RESIDENTIAL TITLE 24 DISABLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS SCOPE: The following disabled access items are taken from the 1991 edition of California Administrative Code Title 24, applicable as of April 1,1994. Per section 110 B, all publicly and privately funded public accommodations and commercial facilities shall be accessible to persons with physical disabilities as follows: (1) Any building, structure, facility, complex, or improved area, or portions thereof, which are used by the general public. (2) Any sanitary facilities which are made available for the public, clients, or employees in such accommodations or facilities. (3) Any curb or sidewalk intended for public use that is constructed with private funds. (4) All existing accommodations when alterations, structural repairs or additions are made to such accommodations. GENERAL: To assure that barrier-free design is incorporated in alt buildings, facilities, site work and other improvements, these standards apply to all additions, alterations and structural repairs. These standards incorporate the requirements covered in Title II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Items preceded with an asterisk (*) are examples of changes that have occurred since the previous regulations. NOTE: All Figures and Tables referenced in this checklist are printed in California Administrative Code, Title 24. • SITE ACCESSIBILITY 1. At every primary public entrance and at every major function along or leading to an accessible route of travel, there shall be a sign displaying the international symbol of accessibility. Signs shall indicate the direction to accessible building entrances and facilities. • DISABLED ACCESS PARKING SPACES 2. *Accessible spaces shall be located as follows, per section 3107A(a)1: a) On the shortest possible route to an accessible entrance when serving a particular building. b) On the shortest route of travel to an accessible entrance of a parking facility. c) Dispersed and located closest to accessible entrances where buildings have multiple accessible entrances with adjacent parking. 3. Parking spaces shall be identified by a reflectorized sign permanently posted immediately adjacent to and visible from each space, consisting of a profile view of Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 a wheelchair with occupant in white on dark blue background. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and, when in a path of travel, shall be posted at a minimum height of 80" from the bottom of the sign to parking space finished grade. Signs may also be centered on the wall of the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 36" from the parking space finished grade, ground or sidewalk. Spaces complying with section 3107A(b)2 shall have an additional sign 'Van-Accessible" mounted below the symbol of accessibility per section 3107A(c). In addition, each accessible space is required to be marked with the international symbol of accessibility. 4. An additional sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place at each entrance to off street parking facilities, or immediately adjacent to and visible from each stall or space. The sign shall be not less than 17" by 22" with lettering not less than 1" in height. Per section 3107A(c) required wording is as follows: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed at or by telephoning " 5. Space(s) shall be located so that disabled persons are not compelled to wheel or walk behind parked cars other than their own per section 3107A(b)3. 6. *A minimum of one in every 8 accessible spaces shall be served by an access aisle 96" minimum width and shall be designated van accessible per section 3107A(b)2. All such spaces may be grouped on one level of a parking structure. • CURB RAMPS (SHOW COMPLYING DETAILS ON THE PLANS) • PEDESTRIAN RAMPS 1. A path of travel with a slope exceeding 1:20 (5%) shall be considered a ramp per section 3307(a.1). Handrails are required to be provided at each side of ramps. WHY DO THE ELEVATIONS SAY NO HANDRAILS ARE REQUIRED??? 2. The maximum allowable slope for accessible ramps is 1:12 (8.33%), per section 3307(e.1)1. 'PROVIDE THE LEAST POSSIBLE SLOPE FOR ALL RAMPS. 3. Handrails shall be 1%" to 114" in cross section and placed a minimum of 1%" from walls, per section 3307(e.1). Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 4. Per section 3307(e.1), handrails shall meet the following requirements: a) Be continuous. b) *Located 34" to 38" in height above the ramp surface. c) Have 12" extensions beyond the top and bottom. d) Ends shall be returned. 5. If ramp exceeds 10'0" in length (and ramp is not bounded by walls, curbs or wheel guides shall be provided, per section 3307(h.1). 6. *Wall surfaces, adjacent to handrails, shall be free of sharp or abrasive elements, (i.e., no stucco), per section 3307(e.1). • DOORS 7. Door hardware shall be of the lever or push type and mounted 30" to 44" above the floor, per section 3304(c.1). • SANITARY FACILITIES 8. Doorways leading to men's sanitary facilities shall be identified by an equilateral triangle 1/4" thick with edges 12" long and a vortex pointing upward. Women's facilities shall be identified by a circle, 1/4" thick, 12" in diameter. Unisex facilities shall be identified by a circle with a triangle superimposed on the circle and within the 12" diameter. The required symbols shall be centered on the door at a height of 60". *See section 3105A(b)1.D. See 3105A(e)10 for additional signage. 9. *As per section 3105A(b)3.B., there shall be a sufficient space in the toilet room for a wheelchair measuring 30" x 48" to enter the room and permit the door to close. No door shall be permitted to encroach into this space. There shall be a clear floor space at least 60" in diameter, or a T-shaped space as shown in Figure 31-12 (a) and (b). Doors are not permitted to encroach into this space. • RESTROOM FIXTURES AND ACCESSORIES 10. In new construction, water closets in accessible restrooms shall meet the following requirements per section 5-1502: a) The height of the water closet seat shall be between 17" and 19". b) The controls shall be operable with one hand and shall not require tight grasping, pinching or twisting of the wrist. c) The controls for flush valves shall be mounted on the side of the toilet area and be no more than 44" above the floor. d) The force required to activate the controls shall be no greater than 5 pounds of force. e) In alterations where the existing fixture is less than 15" high, a 3" seat shall be permitted. Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 11. Lavatories shall comply with the following requirements per section 3105A(b)4A, 3105A(h)4.and5-1504: a) A minimum of 30" x 48" clear space shall be provided in front of the lavatory for forward approach. The clear space may include knee and toe space beneath the fixture. b) The clear space beneath lavatories shall be a minimum of 29" high x 30" wide x 8" deep at the top and 9" high x 30" wide and 17" deep at the bottom from the front of the fixture. The maximum height of the counter top shall be 34" c) All hot water and drain pipes under the lavatory shall be insulated. d) The faucet controls and operating mechanism shall be of the type not requiring tight grasping, pinching or twisting of the wrist and have an operating force of not greater than 5 pounds. e) If self-closing valves are used, they shall remain open for at least 10 seconds. 12. Grab bars shall comply with the following per section 3105A(b)3.C.: a) Grab bars shall be located on each side or one side and the back of the physically disabled accessible toilet stall or compartment. They shall be securely attached 33" above the floor and parallel except where a tank-type toilet is used which obstructs placement at 33", the grab bar may be installed as high as 36". b) Grab bars at the side shall be located 15" to 161/2" (+/.1n) from the center line of the water closet stool and be at least 42" long with the front end positioned 24" in front of the stool. Total length of bars at the back shall not be less than 36". c) The diameter or width of the grab bar gripping surface shall be 11/4" to 11/2" or the shape shall provide an equivalent gripping surface. If mounted adjacent to a wall, the space between the wall and the grab bar shall be 11/2". d) See section 3105A(b)3.C.(iii) for structural strength requirements. NOTE: See Figures 31-1A, 311B, 31-1C, 31-2A, 31-9A and 31-9B. 13. Where towel, sanitary napkins, waste disposal and other similar dispensing and disposal fixtures are provided, at least one of each type shall be located with all operable parts within 40" of the floor. Mirrors shall be mounted with the bottom edge no higher than 40" above the floor. 14. Toilet tissue dispensers shall be located on the wall within 12" of the front edge of the toilet seat per section 3105A(b)4.C. Carlsbad 94-1607 December 14, 1994 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver BUILDING ADDRESS: 2711 Haymar Dr. PLAN CHECK NO.: 94-16O7 DATE: December 14, 1994 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION Pro Shop Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA I VALUATION (sq. ft.) 1 MULTIPLIER 3200 3200 3200 38 3.5 1.7 VALUE ($) 121600 11200 5440 138240 Building Permit Fee: Plan Check Fee: Comments: $ 776,00 $ 504.40 Sheet 1 of 2 valuefee.dot Carlsbad 94-16O7 December 14, 1994 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Kurt Culver BUILDING ADDRESS: 2711 Haymar Dr. PLAN CHECK NO.: 94-1607 DATE: December 14, 1994 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: B-2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION Storage Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE BUILDING AREA (sq. ft.) 1000 1000 VALUATION MULTIPLIER 22 1.7 VALUE ($) 22000 1700 23700 Building Permit Fee: Plan Check Fee: Comments: $ 243.00 $ 157.95 Sheet 2 of 2 valuefee.dot City of CarlsbaddiTJM.T^mm Department DATE: BUILDINQT ADDRESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: /6> BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK WQ. CB - /&<* 7 :&f ASA* -V> '**&* EST. VALUE APPROVAL The Kern you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval Is based on plans, Information and/or specifications provided in your submrttal; therefore any changes to these Items after this date, Including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. I IA Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked with O Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans arid/or specifications to this office for review. By:.Date: By,Date: By:.Date: ATTACHMENTS ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON I—I Dedication Application D Dedication Checklist I I Improvement Application I I Improvement Checklist I—I Future Improvement Agreement LJ Grading Permit Application O Grading Submrttal Checklist n Right of Way Permit Application LJ Right of Way Permit Submtttal Checklist and Information Sheet LJ Sewer Fee Information Sheet P:\DOCS\CHKLST\BP0001 .FRM NAME: City of Carlsbad ADDRESS: 2075 Las Palmas Dr.. Carlsbad. CA 92009 PHONE :f619l 438-1161. Ext. A-4 REVOS/11/94 2O75 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad, CA 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-O894 BUILDING PUVNCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 3rd/ 0 D D 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow D. Property Lines Easements B. Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements C. Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns C. Existing Topography B. Existing & Proposed Slopes D D 3. Include note: "Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradient for no less than 5* or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever is less)." [Per 1985 UBC2907(d}5]. On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus two percent" (per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5.). D 4. Include on title sheet A. Site address B. Assessor's Parcel Number C. Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: Total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION P:\DOO\CHKLST\BP0001 .PRM ' Pag* 1 Of 4 REV 06/11/M A BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 1sV 2nd*/ 3rdV D D D 5. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. Conditions were complied with by: Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS D 6. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submrttal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by hw/*> ^33^-^" _ Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS D D D 7a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ _ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public Improvements required as follows: _ Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. Attached please find an application form and submfttal checklist for the public improvements requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed bv: . *wn^ _ Date:_ p:\DOCs\CHKLrr\BPoooi .FTOI Page 2 or 4 REV OS/II/M BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST IsW and*/ 3rcV D U D 7b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future public improvements required as follows: Improvement Plans signed by: Date:. D D 7c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return signed and notarized Agreement to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: __ D D 7d. J^ Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the Citv Inspector prior to occupancy, p AJ^^ "3$ '^^ GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 1 1 .06.030 of the Municipal Code. D 8a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). D 8b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be Submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be Issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: M -tsc* _ Date: ^ / D D D Be. No Grading Permit required. P:\DOCS\CHKLrr\BP0001.FRII PajpSoM REV OS/11/94 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKUST MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS istv' 2nd%/ 3rdv/ ^ D D 9. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for A separate Right-of-Way permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: D P 10. A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee / is noted in the fees section on the following page. 0 D 11. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a // Permit/ Industrial waste permit accepted bv: f.^^.^^T*^ Date: P:\DOCS\CHKLS1\BP0001 JWI P8Qi4of4 REV 05/11/94 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET Estimate baaad on un rionfrom appfeant alculatton baaid on buJoTng planchack plan aubmittal Prapfiradby:.Date:,by:*- EDU CALCULATIONS: Utt typaa «nd square tooteQM for «• $Pe#6f fSfc*~ TypM of UM: Xao jf/Wp /^Snfi^Z Sq. RAInite APT CALCULATIONS: Uat tvoaa and square tootaoaa tor ai of Uaa: STdfl-Aat /M>&— Sq. Ft/UnttK - 1 4— +EDLTr /> TotdEDLTc Tot^ADTa FEES REQUIRED: PUBLIC FAOUTIES FEE REQUIRED Jfcf YES D NO ($M BuUdbig D^Mrtmwit tor amount) CFD: DYES (nobfidg«&thoroughfare^, J0NO _• i ^*_—JM— * - * ^—.—.% ^^ WITHIN 1.PARK-JN-UEUFEE FEE/UNIT: raduoad Traffic Impact Faa) PARK AREA:. X NO. UNITS: 2.TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADTa/UNlTS: ADTaAJNlTS: FACtUTIES MANAGEMENT FEE SQPT.: SEWER FEE PERMIT No. EDU-a:X FEE/EDU: DRAINAGE BASIN: X BENEFTTAREA: FEEJEDU! J0^~ HIOW LATERAL ($2.500 DEPOSIT) TERFEE EDU-t: OF ABOVE FEES*: S 7D ^^P^/^OA/AC- &£%'2 • OCn^z/iWf', •NOTE: Thla calculation ahaal la NOT a complata Hat of atffaaa which i Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. CITY OF CARLSBAD GRADING INSPECTION CHECKLIST FOR PARTIAL SITE RELEASE PROJECT INSPECTOR: A I L PROJECT ID DATE: f LOTS REQUESTED FOR RELEASE:. N/A = NOT APPLICABLE i/ m COMPLETE 0 = Incomplete or unacceptable &; It A GRADING PERMIT NO. Sho 1st // Vs I// / A/A / S 2nd. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Site access to requested lots adequate and logically grouped Site erosion control measures adequate. Overall site adequate for health, safety and welfare of public. Letter of request for partial release submitted 8Vi" x 11' site plan showing requested lots submitted. Compaction report from soils engineer submitted. Engineer of work certification of work done and pad elevations. Geologic engineer's letter if unusual geologic or subsurface conditions exist. Project conditions of approval checked for conflicts Can water service be installed prior to bringing building combustibles on site. D Partial release of grading for the above stated lots is approved for the purpose of building permit issuance. Issuance of building permits is still subject to all normal City requirements required pursuant to the building permit process. Partial release of the site is denied for the following reasons: Date Project Engineer Senior Inspector Date H:\LIBRAR Y\ENG\WPDATAUNSPECT\FORMS\PARTSITE.FRM Date Citv of Carlsbad Engineering Department TO: FROM: DATE: DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES ENGINEERING INSPECTION DIVISION t^ ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO. (P.E. OR TRACT #) V. (PROJECT NAME & ADDFS) (DEVELOPER'S NAME & ADDRESS) We have inspected the grading for Lots frV?or Phase of the above mentioned project. In addition, we have received rough grading certification from ^«?HfUf./u ^(T 5*p] /< ftrpc-fpy^^the Soils Engineer, dated /1/ag /^f and from f^]^t^^i l^» ' c* iTt*. -z.^t ^ . the Supervision Grading Engineer, dated >^^'. and are satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with City Standards. Based on these certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the issuance of a building oermit for Lotsflrv»4kfy ^ £k*A or Phase -- ' of project *QQ _ from a grading standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project from other engineering concerns including site development, water or sewer availability, or final grading. We will need to be advised prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy so that we can verify that final grading and landscaping has been completed in accordance with the approved plans for the project. APPROVED: PR NG INSPECTOR SR. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR H:\U8RARY\DPS\WPDATA\INSPECT\ROUGGRAD.FOR 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1 576 • (619)438-1161 Ks^1— 1D01Ul 1tc B1 g15^isiVse!1Si'!Hi5 »;3 e ^i^^ ^ i i 1 :« ' '/illii ^ '$' 'rUrA "L?T|H^&s6g—I-hn *;i iS &« 78*1V •" HniS T oi a«ijV1iy{OS!S!ft:r!r |i-i3 nrs.01 ? •s*7-lftlIULJ0;"]iHJ1;5Ej st 5 a a i J ( llI "1 David P. Thonpson, Superintendent Carlsbad Golf Practice Facility 2711 Haymar Dr. Carlsbad, GA 92008 November 22, 1994 TO: Carlsbad Engineering Dept. ATIN: Al Ludwig I request partial rough grade release for building pad areas as shown P.E.2.93.09. Respectfully E David P. Thompson SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160-0627 619-280-4321, FAX 619-280-4717 November 28, 1994 Mr. Martin Huffman 1901 Lincoln Street Oceanside, California 92054 SCS&T 9311121 Report No. 9 Subject:Interim Compaction Report, Golf Practice Facility, Haymar Drive, Carlsbad, California. Reference:"Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Golf Practice Facility"; Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc.; June 29, 1993. Dear Mr. Huffman: t In accordance with your request we have prepared this letter to confirm that the building pads for the proposed Pro Shop and Storage Shed have been graded in accordance with the recommendations contained in the referenced report and are ready to receive improvements. A comprehensive report of As-Built Geology, Testing and Observations for the mass grading operations of the entire site is being prepared and will be submitted shortly. If you should have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted ALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. DBA/nr cc: (6) Submitted Alba Engineering Inc. November 22,1994 -c^.£>!LLj -w -- '&'& ': '*** £#3" ,- :•>•?•.• *^.if, ,'*- fcr- "- -"--«- ' '•<;,": £.• •«-'3t.'»$r- ^^,-^v, ^ilfe'-^J" -^ J ' ^ '*--^V^- ;> -:" 4S^'^•"••'^.sssa ^vv. Ea•-:;W? 5*1 "JL" "W^ &m. ^ *V. ' 9*t? •*-^m: -,r>- City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Dr Carlsbad, Ca. 92009 Subject: Requesting Partial Grading Release C.U.P. 92-4 Carlsbad Engineering Dept.; ATTN A! Ludwig The building pads has been graded to within 0.1 feet +/- of the elevation shown on the approved grading plan. The building pads are in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. i Respectfully, Richard L. Cruzen R.C.E 22938 Ir 5e No. 22938 r j l\ \ til PLANNING CHECKLIST Plan Check No. W-/607 Address "Z7// AN V A) Planner APN: Type of Project and Use Zone iL--('*?0 Facilities Management Zone CFD (in/<5utj) # Phone 438-1161 ext. H325 ass Q"U D (It property in, complete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department.) Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified Environmental Review Required: YES 2^ NO TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: &*? Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval D Discretionary Action Required: YES^_ NO TYPE C(jP ^^7(4} APPROVAI/RESO. NO. DATE: PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval D California Coastal OnmmsBon Permit Required: YES NQx\ DATE OF APPROVAL: San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA. 92108*1725 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval dan DD an n ana ana [ndusionary Housing Fee required: YES NO A (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Site Plan: Zoning: 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned setbacks and existing topographical lines. 2. Provide legal description of property, and assessor's parcel number. 1. Setbacks: Front: Int. Side: Street Side: Rear: 2. Lot coverage: 3. Height: 4. Parking: Additional Comments Required Required Required Required Required Required Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown 6f Shown 7 7 Shown OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE PLNOCFRM 57 City of Carlsbad Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check f Date of Report: Monday. March 13.1995 Reviewed by:_ Contact Name Huffman Martin Address 1901 Lincoln st City, State Oceanside CA 92054 Bldg. Dept. No. 94-1607 Planning No. Job Name Carlsbad Golf Prac Job Address 27HHaymar Ste. or Bidg. No. £3 Approved - The item you have submitted tor review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. D Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID CFD Job# 94294 File* __ 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 - (619) 931-2121 City of Carlsbad Fire Department • Bureau of Prevention Plan Review: Requirements Category: Building Plan Check Date of Report: Monday, December 12. 1994 _ Reviewed bv: ^*^ Contact Name Huffman Martin Address 1901 Lincoln St City, State Oceanside CA 92054 Bldg. Dept. No. 94-1607 Planning No. Job Name Carlsbad Golf Prac Job Address 2711 Haymar Ste. or Bldg. No. Approved - The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans; information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifica- tions, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to construct or install improvements. Disapproved - Please see the attached report of deficiencies. Please make corrections to plans or specifications necessary to indicate compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. For Fire Department Use Only Review 1 st 2nd 3rd Other Agency ID CFD Job# 94294 Re# 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 * (619) 931-2121 Requirements Category; Building Plan Check HAF94294 •DeficiencyJtem: Pending 01 Project Data Provide complete address and suite designation. Provide building construction information indicating occupancy classification, type of construction, number of stories, aggregate square footage, occupant load, and description of intended uses. Deficiency Item: Pending 11 Knox Box Knox Box required when access to or within a structure or an area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life saving or fire-fighting purposes. The Fire Dept. will determine the location for the key box and provide an authorized order form. Deficiency Item: Pending 18 Fire Extinguishers Required Provide one 2A10BC fire extinguisher for each 6000 square feet or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. See item 32 for any additional fire extinguisher requirements. Deficiency Item: Pending 25 Exit Signs SEC.33l4,(a) Where Required. When two or more exits from a story are required by Section 3303, exit signs shall be installed at stair enclosure doors, horizontal exits and other required exits from the story. When two or more exits are required from a room or area, exit signs shall be installed at the required exits from the room or area and where otherwise necessary to clearly indicate the direction of egress. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Main exterior exit doors which obviously and clearly are identifiable as exits need not be signed when approved by the building official. 2. Group R, Division 3, and individual units of Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. 3. Exits from rooms or areas with an occupant toad of less than 50 when located within a Group I, Division 1.1,1.2 or 2 occupancy or a Group E, Division 3 day-care occupancy. Illumination: Signs shall be internally or externally illuminated by two electric lamps or shall be of an approved self-luminous type. Power Supply: Current supply to one of the lamps for exit signs shall be provided by the premises' wiring system. Power to the other lamp shall be from storage batteries or an on-site generator set. Deficiency Item: Pending 26 Exit Illumination Exits shall be illuminated at any time the building is occupied with light having intensity of not less than 1 footcandle at floor level. The power supply for exit illumination shall normally be provided by the premises'wiring system. In the event of its failure, illumination shall be automatically provided from an emergency system of Group I, Division 1 Occupancies and for all other occupancies where the exiting system serves an occupant load of 100 or more. Deficiency Item: Pending 27 Occupant Load Signs Any room having an occupant load of 50 or more where fixed seats are not instalfed, and which is used for classroom, assembly or similar purpose, shall have the capacity of the room posted in a conspicuous place . Page 2 12/12/94 City of Carlsbad 94294 Fire Department * Bureau of Prevention General Comments: Date of Report: Monday. December 12.1994 Contact Name Huffman Martin Address 1901 Lincoln St City, State Oceanside CA 92054 Bldg. Dept. No. 94-1607 Planning No. Job Name Cartebad Golf Prac Job Address 27iiHaymar Ste. or Bldg. No. Submit sprinkler and underground plans separately. 2560 Orion Way • Carlsbad, California 92008 • (619) 931-2121 INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGE PERMIT APPLICATION se NO. ^ APPL. NO. IND. BUSINESS NAME Cfl/ S"/^/) SITE ADDRESS Dg_. CONTACT PERSON (at business) PHONE NUMBER -4 3 3 '/ Type of Business (check all that apply) Agricultural Assembly Automotive Chemical Handling Electronics DFood Government Laboratory Laundry Manufacturing Medical Metal Work Office Photo Lab Retail Service Station Warehouse Other (Z&i_f=- DESCRIBE WASTE OTHER THAN DOMESTIC (Chemicals, Particulates, etc.) DESCRIBE BUSINESS ACTIVITY: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF ONSfTE WASTEWATER PROCESSING: (chemical & physical characteristics)^ Is business presently in operation at site? D YES EwO Has Wastewater Discharge Permit been applied for through the Encina Water Authority? D YES D NO Applicant's Nameto&JgT//U Title & Please Print Agency:./ Signature:.Date Date Signature of^Trty ^EXEMPT D NOT EXEMPT Date forwarded to Encina P:VK)CSVIlSFCR«\FKNOOOt5 REV. 2/10/VZ Hazardous Materials SAN DIEGO REGIONAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS QUESTIONNAIRE Management Division ••lira cam MO CtllTT M tli Illll Business Name Contact Person Mailing Address City SUM Zip Plan Kief Site Address City State Zip Plan File* PART I; FIRE DEPARTMENT - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION: OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION indicate by circling the item, whathar your bueinass will use, process, or store any of tha following hazardous materials. If any or the items are circled, applicant must contact tha Fire Protection Agancy with jurisdiction prior to plan sutxnittal. 1 . Explosive or Blasting Aganta 2. Compressed Gasas 3. Flammable or Combustible Liquida 4. Flammable Solids 5. Organic Peroxides 6. Oxidizara 7. Pyrophorica 8. Unstable Raactivea 9. Water Reactivaa 10. Cryogenics 11. Highly Toxic or Toxic Materials 12. Radioactive* 1 3. Corrosives 1 4. Other Health Hazards PART II: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO HEALTH DEPARTMENT • HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT DIVISION: CONTINGENCY PLAN REVIEW: >f the answer to any of tha questions is ye*, applicant must contact tha County of San Diego Hazardous Materials Management Division, 1 255 Imperial Avenue, 3rd Floor, San Diego, CA 92186-5261. Talaphona (0191 338*2222 prior to tha issuance of a building permit. FEES MAY BE REQUIRED Yes a your buainaaa liatad on tha ravaraa aida of this form? Will your tauainaaa dispose of Haiardoua Subataneaa or Medical Waste in any amount? Will your business stora or handle Hazardous Subataneaa in quantities equal to or graatar than 55 gallons, 500 pounds, 200 cubic faat or carcinogana/raproductiva toxina in any quantity? ill your business uaa an existing or inatafl an underground storage tank? Will your business stora or handJa Acutely Hazardous Materials? OFFICE USE ONLY [""] RMPP Exempt Data Initials f"| RMPP Required Date Initials I""] RMPP Completed Date Initials PART III: SAN DIEGO COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT if the answer to any of tha questions ia yaa, applicant must contact tha Air Pollution Control Diatrict, 9150 Chesapeake Drive, San Diego, CA 92123. Telephone (619) 694-3307 prior to tha issuance of a building permit. YES NO 1 . |~~| rTyw'll the intended occupant inataH or uaa any of tha equiprnant tiatad on tha Listing of Air Pollution Control Diatrict Permit Categories, on the reversa sida of this form? 2 I — I |— I (ANSWER ONLY IF QUESTION 1 IS YES.) Will tha subject facility ba located within 1,000 faat of tha outar boundary of a school (K through 1 2} as listed in tha ourrant Directory of School and Community Collage) Districts, published by tha San Diego County Office of Education and tha currant California; Private School Directory, compiled in accordance with proviakwe of Education Coda Section 33190? Name of Owner or Authorized Agent: Signature ofOw/Mr or Authorized Agent: I declare under penalty of perjury that to the beet of my knowledge and belief the rasponaee made herein era true and correct, ^i-, _*. ^ ^XX. Att^jfrfex-^**j . Date: _~2_ Do not write below this line FIRE DEPARTMENT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: BY:Date: EXEMPT MUM HBMIT HIOUfUMMTt COUNTY-HMMO APCD Apmovfp ran auiLOwo PWWT BUT NOT OCCUPANCY COUNTY-HMMO APCO AMWVIP KM OCCUPANCY COUNTY-HMMO APCD Eaviraaneolil Hcsah Servk DHS HM-9171 (6V92) Couaty of 3m Ditto Depenaaat of Heeaa Scrrieei Alba Engineering Inc.&,,iJny A**' RECEIVED CITY OF CARLSBAD ENGINEERING COUNTER November 24, 1995 Mr. David Hauser Assistant City Engineer City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, Ca 92009-1576 Subject: Carlsbad Golf Practice Facility C.U.P. 92-4, HDP 93-15, SUP 92-2, - Building Construction Dear David: Structures at the above captioned site are anchored in such a fashion as to prevent flotation in a flood during a storm of 100 year frequency. Furthermore, the structures were built in compliance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code, whereby those standards of floodproofing are satisfied. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, Richard L. Cruzen R.C.E. 22938 «_55^-rfisz" *at-LYttt— *21:2:D«i—ia o:HBSBDS00 ; ;VI £ !1 TOUG<S>BOLNEUGROTERLEA*DV*s:-g <eg i>> < \ 5*3Sa BEIBBtiB AJ aiHi (4 ICQ ~)") aa;OJ JL au.UJLJX ai- LJ U.U I—z:H- !z5 l—I S<T _J ax nQ^ fcl N au o3 uo<ca. ai—ii— ^PQt—i &.j_ C^t—i Q na xt_i—i > u 2<_Ia.r a Qi U_ O PQ NDISIA3a a n» KM X^ a)r* *•ni n 8 8 ' **• (K O ...* M ? «YZAl M Pi | w t 5< £(9 a W o a o n a z• O b. US § ' t . K« »« - < 1. * Ln i s•»i f MB "* -* "' ID IPg fa 3 S i: S 2 i •9661 '9 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdate Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160-0627 619-280-4321,FAX 619-280-4717 May 24, 1995 Mr. Martin Huffman 1901 Lincoln Street Oceanside, California 92054 SCS&T 9311121 Report No. 13 SUBJECT: Footing Excavation Observation, Maintenance Shed, Golf Practice Facility, Haymar Drive, Carlsbad, California. REFERENCE: "Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Golf Practice Facility;" Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc.; June 29, 1993. Dear Mr. Huffman: This letter has been prepared to confirm that we have observed the footing excavations for the proposed pro shop building. Our observation indicated that: a) The soil conditions exposed in the footing excavations do not differ from the conditions anticipated in the preparation of the referenced report prepared for the subject development. b) The depth and width of the footing excavations were found to comply with the recommendations presented in the referenced report and the structural plans for the subject development (Sheets 7 and 8, prepared by James Earl Sneed, dated April 12, 1995). All footings will be founded on a suitable bearing stratum. c) All footing excavations extend into compacted fill. d) The foundation recommendations presented in the referenced report have been complied with. If you should have any questions after reviewing this letter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully Submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. Daniel B. Adlei DBA:mw cc: (6) Submitted SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160-0627 619-280-4321,FAX 619-280-4717 April 24, 1995 Mr. Martin Huffman 1901 Lincoln Street Oceanside, California 92054 SCS&T 9311121 Report No. 12 SUBJECT: Footing Excavation Observation, Pro Shop Building, Golf Practice Facility, Haymar Drive, Carlsbad, California. REFERENCE: "Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Golf Practice Facility;1* Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc.; June 29, 1993. Dear Mr. Huffman: This letter has been prepared to confirm that we have observed the footing excavations for the proposed pro shop building. Our observation indicated that: a) The soil conditions exposed in the footing excavations do not differ from the conditions anticipated in the preparation of the referenced report prepared for the subject development. b) The depth and width of the footing excavations were found to comply with the recommendations presented in the referenced report and the structural plans for the subject development (Sheet 7, prepared by James Earl Sneed, dated April 12, 1995). All footings will be founded on a suitable bearing stratum. c) All footing excavations extend into compacted fill. d) The foundation recommendations presented in the referenced report have been complied with. If you should have any questions after reviewing this letter, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully Submitted, SOKTHERN/CALIFORNIA Darnel B. Adler, R.C.E. #36037 DBA:mw cc: (6) Submitted ND TESTING, INC. 3 'NOIIVDINHKHOD (nHJ.) 56 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SdLATliSTINGJNC , San D»«w, CA OJiai P,U Ron NUT. ftHMffgn. f bl9.2IO-4.t3t. MX 619 2ttU7f7 February 23, 1995 Mr. Martin Hufftnan 1901 Lincoln Street Oceantkle, California 92054 SCSAT 9311121 Roport No. 11 SUBJECT: Review of Foundation Plans, Cwlrtwi Golf Practice Facility. Haynur Driv«. Carlsbad. California. REFERENCE: "Report of Gcotechnical Investigatinn, Carlsbad Gulf Practice FacilJty;" Southwn California Soil and Tiling, Inc.; Juw 29, 1993. Dear Mr, Hoffman: In accordance with Ibe request from Mr. Martin Huffman, this letter ha* been prepared to verify that we have reviewed die foundation plane prepared by Mr. Jamei Sneed ft»r the lubject project (Sheet 7) dated December 5,1994. Hie plan watt found to to in accordance with the rccommetida- tioiw provHled in die referenced report Tills opportunity to he of profeuioaal service is sincerely appreciated. RespectruUy Submitted, SOUMERN CALIFORNIA Daniel B. AdlA, R.C.E. *36Q3? ORAtmw cc: (6) Submitted ft TESTING, INC. 20 WWddTIH --6T9 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160-0627 619-280-4321, FAX 619-280-4717 November 28, 1994 Mr. Martin Huffman 1901 Lincoln Street Oceanside, California 92054 SCS&T 9311121 Report No. 9 Subject:Interim Compaction Report, Golf Practice Facility, Haymar Drive, Carlsbad, California. Reference:"Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Golf Practice Facility"; Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc.; June 29, 1993. Dear Mr. Huffman: In accordance with your request we have prepared this letter to confirm that the building pads for the proposed Pro Shop and Storage Shed have been graded in accordance with the recommendations contained in the referenced report and are ready to receive improvements. A comprehensive report of As-Built Geology, Testing and Observations for the mass grading operations of the entire site is being prepared and will be submitted shortly. If you should have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted SQUTHERHCALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. Daniel B. DBA/nr cc: (6) Submitted SUMMARY OF AS-BUILT GEOLOGY, FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND TESTS FOR RELATIVE COMPACTION CARLSBAD GOLF PRACTICE FACILITY HAYMAR DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR: MR. MARTIN HUFFMAN 1901 LINCOLN STREET OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92054 PREPARED BY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. 6280 RIVERDALE STREET r r SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL & TESTING, INC. 6280 Riverdale Street, San Diego, CA 92120 P.O. Box 600627, San Diego, CA 92160-0627 619-280-4321, FAX 619-280-4717 December 8, 1994 Mr. Martin Huffman 1901 Lincoln Street Oceanside, California 92054 SCS&T9311121 Report No. 10 SUBJECT: Summary of As-Built Geology, Field Observations and Tests for Relative Compaction, Carlsbad Golf Practice Facility, Haymar Drive, Carlsbad, California. REFERENCE: "Report of Geotechnical Investigation, Carlsbad Golf Practice Facility;" Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc.; June 29, 1993. Dear Mr. Huffman: r r r r In accordance with your request, this report has been prepared to summarize the results of field observations and tests for relative compaction performed at the subject site by Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc. These services were performed between September 29 and November 22, 1994. SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is an irregular shaped parcel of land located near the cul-de-sac terminus of Haymar Drive in Carlsbad, California. The eastern property line is located approximately 200 feet west of the center of the cul-de-sac. Haymar Drive borders along the north property line. Undeveloped property exists to the west and east of the subject site. Residential property exists to the distant south of the subject property. Topographically, most of the property is relatively level. Moderately steep to steep hillslope terrain comprise the western and southern portion of the property. The majority of the property is flat-lying terrain located within a 100-year flood plain. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION It is our understanding that the proposed improvements will consist of a golf shop/snack bar structure, a maintenance shed and associated paved parking. The structures will be of wood-frame construction. Shallow foundations and conventional slab-on-grade floor systems are anticipated. r SCS&T 9311121 December 8, 1994 Page 2 AVAILABLE PLANS To assist in determining the locations and elevations of our field density tests and to define the general extent of the site grading for this phase of work, we were provided with an undated grading plan prepared by Alba Engineering. SITE PREPARATION Site preparation began with the removal of existing alluvial deposits underlying the proposed pro shop and storage shed structures to a depth of nine feet and seven feet below finish pad grade, respectively. The bottom of the excavation was overlain by stabilizing fabric (Amoco 2002). A 1.5 foot thick blanket of crushed rock was placed over the stabilizing fabric. The rock was wrapped on the sides and top with filter fabric (Supac 6NP). Fill derived from on-site stockpiles were placed over the filter fabric in thin compacted layers until finish pad grades were achieved. In proposed parking areas removal depth extended to a depth ranging from one foot to 1.5 feet from original grades. The bottom of the excavation was scarified to a depth of about 12 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted. The excavation was then covered with stabilizing fabric. Fill was then placed in thin layers until finish grade elevations was achieved. The fill was derived from the material previously excavated as well as cut from the hillside area west of the driving range. The 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) fill slope along the eastern portion of the proposed parking lot was overfilled and cut back to finish contours. Site preparation for the proposed tee area consisted of the scarification, moisture conditioning and compaction of the upper 12 inches of the existing surficial soils. Fill was then placed in thin layers until finish grade elevations was achieved. During grading operations a storm drain was placed north of the proposed pro shop. Site preparation for the storm drain consisted of undercutting the existing alluvium to a depth of about two feet below the bottom of the storm drain. The bottom of the undercut was covered with filter fabric, one foot of crushed rock wrapped in filter fabric and one foot of compacted fill. Construction of the proposed drainage channel surrounding the driving range entailed the removal of saturated alluvial deposits to a depth of three feet below the proposed channel bottom. A one- foot thick layer of two-foot-minus rock enveloped with stabilizing fabric was placed at the bottom SCS&T 9311121 December 8, 1994 Page 3 of the excavation. Fill consisting of a blend of the excavated clayey alluvium and sandy soils obtained from the hillside cut area, was placed over the rock. The thickness of the initial lift ranged from one foot to 1.5 feet. The excavation was entirely filled with compacted fill and the channel was then cut to its final configuration. The width of the channel excavation extended to approximately five feet horizontally beyond the top of the channel slopes. The limits of removal operations and stabilizing fabric placement for the proposed building pads and parking areas are shown on Plate Number 1 of this report. FIELD OBSERVATION AND TESTING Field observation and density tests were performed by a representative of Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc. during the mass grading operations. The density tests were taken according to ASTM D1556-82 (sand cone) and D2922-81 (nuclear gauge). The results of those tests are shown on the attached plates. The accuracy of the in-situ density test locations and elevations is a function of the accuracy of the survey control provided by other than Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc. representatives. Unless otherwise noted, their locations and elevations were determined by pacing and hand level methods and should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. As used herein, the term "observation" implies only that we observed the progress of work we agreed to be involved with, and performed tests, on which, together, we based our opinion as to whether the work essentially complies with the job requirements, local grading ordinances and the Uniform Building Code. LABORATORY TESTS Maximum dry density determinations were performed on representative samples of the soils used in the compacted fills according to ASTM D1557-78, Method A. This method specifies that a four (4) inch diameter cylindrical mold of 1/30 cubic foot volume be used and that the soil tested be placed in five (5) equal layers with each layer compacted by twenty-five (25) blows of a 10-pound hammer with an 18-inch drop. The results of these tests, as presented on Plate Number 3, were used in conjunction with the field density tests to determine the degree of relative compaction of the compacted fill. SCS&T 9311121 December 8, 1994 Page 4 AS-BUILT GEOLOGY Based on the results of on-site observations by representatives of Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc., the following conclusions are presented, 1) The geologic conditions exposed at the site are similar to those described in the referenced geotechnical report. These conditions consisted of loose to medium dense, wet to saturated alluvium and colluvium. In addition, soils were removed from the hillside portion of the site and placed as compacted fill on the lower portion of the subject site. The soils observed in the cut slope consisted of dense and hard, interbedded, fine to coarse sand and expansive, plastic silty clay and clayey silt. The contacts between the sands and clays were noted to dip a few degrees in both a westerly and easterly direction. 2) The grading operations presented in the referenced reports and those recommended during grading appear to have been followed. In addition, due to borrowing soils from the western hillside the resulting slope was flattened to an inclination of approximately 4 to 1, horizontal to vertical, from the original inclination. 3) The grading performed at the site to date has been detailed in the grading and compaction section of this report and appears to have been done in conformance with the referenced report. 4) AH cut slopes and areas which were filled were observed and all adverse geologic conditions were mitigated to that extent defined in the referenced geotechnical report. The possible adverse geologic conditions consisted of potential liquefaction, flooding and slope instability. Both liquefaction and flooding were addressed in the referenced geotechnical report. Although the hillside west of the alluvial valley was not originally anticipated to be involved in the mass grading, the hillside was utilized as a borrow area so as to generate fill soils for the lower portion of the site. The resulting hillside inclination was flattened to 4 to 1, horizontal to vertical, while borrowing soils. Although the hillside is underlain by interbedded sand and clay, it is our opinion that the hillside stability has been increased over that of the natural slope by reducing the slope inclination to 4 to 1, horizontal to vertical. SCS&T 9311121 December 8, 1994 Page 5 5) In our professional opinion and to the best of our knowledge, the site appears to be geologically suitable and safe for construction of the proposed improvements. REMAINING WORK Additional grading and backfill operations will be required for the backfilling of utility trenches and the preparation of the subgrade and base material placement in the parking areas. It is recommended that field observations and relative compaction tests be performed during these operations to verify that these operations are performed in accordance with job requirements and local grading ordinances. CONCLUSIONS GENERAL: Based on our field observations and the in-place density test results, it is the opinion of Southern California Soil and Testing, Inc. that the grading work was performed substantially in accordance with the recommendations contained in the referenced geotechnical report, the City of Carlsbad grading ordinance, and the Uniform Building Code. Recommendations for the minimum design of foundations, as presented in the referenced report, remain applicable. EXPANSIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The prevailing foundation soils were found to be nondetrimentally expansive. Therefore, the foundation recommendations provided in the referenced report remain applicable and should be implemented. SETTLEMENT MONUMENTS: Settlement monuments recommended in the referenced report were not installed. However, it is our opinion that since the proposed building pad areas were essentially brought to grade by October 10, 1994, any detrimental settlements anticipated due to the fill placement are likely to have already occurred. Therefore, construction of the proposed improvements may be placed as recommended in the referenced report. LIMITATIONS This report covers only the services performed between October 3 and November 22, 1994. As limited by the scope of the services which we agreed to perform, our opinion presented herein is based on our observations and the relative compaction test results. Our service was performed in accordance with the currently accepted standard of practice and in such a manner as to provide a SCS&T 9311121 December 8, 1994 Page 6 reasonable measure of the compliance of the grading operations with the job requirements. No warranty, express or implied, is given or intended with respect to the services which we have performed, and neither the performance of those services nor the submittal of this report should be construed as relieving the contractor of his responsibility to conform with the job requirements. If you should have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to contact this office. This opportunity to be of professional service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully Submitted, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SOIL AND TESTING, INC. John/tf. High, C.E.G. #123 CERTIFIED ENGINEERING :OLOGIST Daniel B. Adler^.C.E. #36037 DBA:JRH:mw cc: (6) Submitted JOB NAME; GOLF PRACTICE JOB NO: 9311121 TEST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 DATE 10-3-94 10-3-94 10-3-94 10-3-94 10-3-94 10-3-94 10-4-94 10-4-94 10-4-94 10-4-94 10-5-94 10-6-94 10-6-94 10-7-94 10-7-94 10-7-94 10-7-94 10-11-94 10-11-94 10-12-94 10-12-94 10-12-94 10-14-94 10-14-94 10-14-94 10-18-94 10-18-94 10-18-94 10-18-94 10-20-94 10-20-94 10-25-94 10-25-94 10-25-94 10-26-94 10-27-94 10-27-94 10-27-94 10-27-94 10-27-94 11-21-94 LOCATION See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 RETEST NUMBER 1 RETEST NUMBER 2 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 RETEST NUMBERS 2 AND 6 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 RETEST NUMBER 31 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 ELEVATION (feet, MSL) 31.0 30.5 32.0 32.0 31.0 30.5 32.5 33.5 32.5 33.0 30.5 30.5 29.0 30.5 33.0 34.0 33.5 34.0 32.5 33.5 33.5 32.0 34.0 32.5 36.5 F.G. 35.5 35.5 35.0 34.5 F.G. 22.5 22.5 28.0 26.5 28.0 22.5 26.0 27.5 28.5 34.5 F.G. 34.5 F.G. 32.5 MOISTURE (percent) 11.1 9.9 11.7 13.0 11.7 10.5 10.5 12.4 11.7 11.1 11.1 13.6 13.6 13.0 14.3 9.3 14.3 11.1 11.7 12.4 9.9 11.8 8.3 11.1 8.4 8.7 8.1 7.2 8.3 13.0 22.0 11.8 11.5 12.3 13.6 13.7 10.5 11.4 9.2 10.4 12.6 DRY DENSITY (p-c-f.) 95.9 93.8 102.0 103.1 106.4 100.2 113.1 115.1 106.1 112.2 109.4 112.9 111.7 101.2 112.1 112.5 114.9 113.9 115.5 115.9 112.3 109.3 109.9 113.3 110.9 110.1 117.8 112.2 119.6 117.7 104.8 114.0 120.7 114.1 115.0 110.1 115.8 116.4 109.7 109.5 111.6 SOIL TYPE 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 REL. COMP. (percent) 84.7 82.9 90.1 91.1 94.0 88.5 93.2 94.9 93.7 92.5 96.6 93.1 92.1 83.4 92.4 92.7 94.7 93.9 95.2 95.5 92.6 90.1* 90.6* 93.4* 91.4* 90.8* 97.1* 92.5* 98.6* 97.0 86.3 93.9* 99.4* 94.0* 94.7 90.8* 95.4* 95.9* 90.4* 90.3* 91.9 PLATE NO: 2 JOB NAME; GOLF PRACTICE JOB NO: 9311121 TEST 42 43 44 DATE 11-21-94 11-22-94 11-22-94 LOCATION See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 See Plate Number 1 ELEVATION (feet,MSL) 32.5 34.5 F.G. 34.5 MOISTURE (percent) 13.2 11.5 11.8 DRY DENSITY (p.c.f.) 111.1 115.7 114.8 SOIL TYPE 4 4 4 REL.COMP. (percent) 91.5 95.3 94.6 * - Nuclear Guage F.G. - Finish Grade MAXIMUM DENSITY AND OTOMUM MOISTURE SUMMARY (ASTM P1557-78), METHOD A SOIL TYPE SOIL DESCRIPTION 1 Brown Clayey Sand 2 Tan Clayey Very Silty Sand 3 Gray Brown Clayey Very Silty Sand 4 Tan Gray Clayey Sand and Clay Mix OPTIMUM MOISTURE, % 8.0 12.0 11.2 10.6 MAXIMUM DENSITY, pcf 126.3 113.2 121.3 121.4 PLATEN' r r. City of Carlsbad Building Department OWNER-BUILDER VERIFICATION Attention Property Owner: An 'owner-builder' building permit has been applied for in your name and bearing your signature. Please complete and return this information at your earliest opportunity to avoid unnecessary delay in processing and issuing your building permit. No building permit will be issued until this verification is received. 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement {yes or no) _ 2. I (have/have not) *£&£ J signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. '""^7 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction: Name Address City Phone Contractors License No. 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise, and provide the major work: Name Address City Phone Contractors License No. 5. I will provide some of the work but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated: Name Address Phone Type of Work Signed: Property Ow: Date: 2O75 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 • (619) 438-1161 To: Michael Bock From: Sherri Howard Subject: GOLF PRACTICE FACILITY Date: 7/11/95 Time: 8:41a BOB W. AND I WERE DISCUSSING THE GOLF PRACTICE FACILITY TOADY AND BOB ASKED WHO WAS VERIFYING THAT THE PROJECT WAS REMOVED FROM THE FLOOD PLAIN PER THE SUP 92-02 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. SINCE ENG. RARELY PUTS CONDS. PRIOR TO CERT. OF OCCUP., HELEN MAY NOT HAVE PICKED UP ON IT. IN THE PAST, I HAVE HAD TO WORK DIRECTLY WITH MARGE TO GET INTO THE CERT. OF OCCUP. LOOP. PLEASE FOLLOW-UP. THANKS, SHERRI