Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2799 CREST DR; ; CB003439; Permit09-13-2007 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB003439 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 2799 CREST DR CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Lot#: 0 $371,015.00 Construction Type: VN 6 Reference #: 1 Structure Type: SFD 4 Bathrooms: 3.5 EUCALYPTUS CREST SFD 4146 SF.GAR 1008 SF, COV PAT 1048 SF |at Apptt Entered By: Plan Approved: Issued: Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check#: WITh 9/18/2000 jm Applicant: ASTORGA JOE 1786 ALTAVISTA DRIVE VISTA CA 92084 760-758-2909 Owner: Building Permit Add'l Building Permit Fee Plan Check Add'l Plan Check Fee Plan Check Discount Strong Motion Fee Park in Lieu Fee Park Fee LFMFee Bridge Fee Other Bridge Fee BTD #2 Fee BTD #3 Fee Renewal Fee Add'l Renewal Fee Other Building Fee HMPFee Pot. Water Con. Fee Meter Size Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee Reel. Water Con. Fee $1,573.08 $0.00 $1,022.50 $0.00 $0.00 $37.10 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00?? $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Meter Size Add'l Reel. Water Con. Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF (31 05540) PFF (4305540) License Tax (3 104 193) License Tax (4304193) Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) Sidewalk Fee PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Housing Impact Fee Housing InLieu Fee Housing Credit Fee. Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,925.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,557.68 Total Fees: $5,557.68 Total Payments To Date:$1,022.50 Balance Due:$4,535.18 Inspector: FINAL APPROVAL Date: :Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively < referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. - You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. l/frf' PERMIT APPLICATION CITY o CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. EST. VAL. Plan Ck. Deposi Validated By Date eeesT hie.9087 09/18/00 0001 0 Address (include Bldg/Suite #)usiness Name (at this address) Subdivision Name/NumberLegal Description Assessor's Parcel # St Description of Work &BSUO &*« T2. 7 CONTACT PERSON (if different,from,applicant) I 3/2L Name * Address City "37"""~APPUCANT ~[U Contractor "Q Agent for ^Contractor . Q Owner Q Ag^nt fo'r Owner J^- State/Zip Telephone #Fax* Mame ' Address City State/Zip Telephone # 5.,, CONTRACTOR-COMPANY, NAME 77 ~ ^' ^ -„ . "..'"" —,.--. - -- (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). Name State License # Address License Class City State/Zip City Business License # Telephone # Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # 6." WORKERS' COMPlNS^tlON ' ' ~~ --.--- — -- -....-.. , ;. .-. ,. - _. Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: [~l I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$100] OR LESS) r~| CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. SIGNATURE DATE 7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION " ... . . .; : ,, „ '. 1 hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: CD I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). O I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1. I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. f!~l YES l~lNO 2. I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 5. I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-KESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY „ ' r _ . ,. ! ; Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? D YES f~| NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? l~l YES r~l NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? O YES l~) NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(0 Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 97 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION " "" ~ " .." " " " "~ ' I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE \Lr~P^ r\^l&LflG\ DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance 75 00 December 4, 2000 Raenette Abbey Building Department 1635 faraday avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 RE: Plan Check#'s CB994624, CB994625, CB9944626 In response to your letters dated October 26th regarding the notice of expiration of the plan review applications noted above, we request that the date be extend 120 to 180 days. /) ^ , ^ +-S Earlier this year we were virtually put on hold by the City of Carlsbad pending the issuance of the reports containing the findings of the Street and Tree committees. After the report was completed City staff was unsure as to the how it was to be implemented. Do to these delays and uncertainties MSK chose to withdraw our original improvement plans and are in second plan check with the revised plans. Therefore we feel it is appropriate for the City to extend the expiration date as requested. Sincerely, MSK Development Group Donna C. Wilson Senior Vice President 5142 Avenida Encinas, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 931-2785 Fax (760) 931-2784 *'& EsGil Corporation In fa.rtnersfi.ip u/itfi. government for 'BuiUing Safety DATE: 9/26/OO a APPLICANT JURISDICTION: Carlsbad Q PLAN REVIEWER a FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3437 & 39 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2797 & 99 Crest Dr. PROJECT NAME: Two Story SPD for MSK Development Group The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information: The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Joe Astorga ' . 1786 AltaVista Dr., Vista, CA 92084 I | Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Joe Astorga (v-M-) Telephone #: 760-758-2909 Date contacted:^/2G/c3t (by:fc«- ) Fax #: Mail *-*' Telephone^ Fax In Person REMARKS: By: Mark Beauchamp Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA D MB n EJ Q PC 9/19/00 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 + San Diego, California 92123 + (858)560-1468 *• Fax (858) 560-1576 parlsbad OO-3437 & 39 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 00-3437 & 39 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2797 & 99 Crest Dr. FLOOR AREA: 3146 Dwelling 1008 Garage 1094 Covered Porch 1000 Bonus Room above garage REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 9/26/00 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 9/19/00 PLAN REVIEWER: Mark Beauchamp FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e.. plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad OO-3437 & 39 9/26/60 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: 1. Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. 2. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 1. Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code). 2. Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): a) In any portion of a building wall enclosing bathtubs and showers where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. The window beside the tub in the master bath needs to be tempered. 3. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): a) Private stairways (1 tenant) need only have a handrail on one side if 30" or less in height, b) Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. c) The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. d) Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. 4. Show a self-closer for the door between garage and dwelling. Section 302.4. 5. Specify on the plans the following information for the fireplace(s), per Section 106.3.3: a) Manufacturer's name. b) Model name/number. c) ICBO approval number, or equal. d) Show height of chimney above roof per I.C.B.O. approval or UBC Table 31 -B. Carlsbad 00-3437 & 39 9/26/GO e) Note on the plans that approved spark arresters shall be installed on all chimneys. UBC, Section 3102.3.8. 6. Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 504.3.2. 7. Note on the plans that bathroom receptacle outlets shall be supplied by a minimum of one 20- ampere branch circuit. Such circuits shall have no other outlets. This circuit may serve more than one bathroom. NEC Art. 210-52(d). 8. Provide fluorescent general lighting (40 lumens per watt minimum) in kitchen(s) and bathrooms. 9. The size of header FH-3 is not shown on the plan. 10. The load path on Line 3, 6 and 8 appears to lack continuity from the roof to the foundation. Calculations for Line 3 from the show two shear walls but the plans only show one of the walls. Calculations for Line 6 from the roof show 8 feet of shear wall but none is shown on the plan. Calculations for Line 8 from the roof show 13 feet of shear wall but the plans show only 8 feet of shear wall. Hold downs are shown on the foundation plan for Line 3 but there are no shear walls shown for the first floor. 1.1. Detail the connection for the collar ties over the bonus room. Detail 28 on sheet SD1 does not show the connection of the collar tie to the rafter. • To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. • The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Mark Beauchamp at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad OO-3437 & 39 9/26/00 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PREPARED BY: Mark Beauchamp BUILDING ADDRESS: 2797 & 99 Crest Dr. PLAN CHECK NO.: OO-3437 & 39 DATE: 9/26/00 BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION Dwelling Garage Covered Porch bonus Room Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE Jurisdiction Code AREA ( Sq. Ft.) 3146 1008 1094 1000 4246 f~*QL*D Valuation Multiplier 82.00 23.00 7.25 82.00 3.00 By Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance *r Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) 257,972 23,184 7,932 82,000 12,738 383,826 1,615.08 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review:] Complete Review ] Structural Only Zl Repetitive Fee 1 'W Repeats D Other D Hourly Esgil Plan Review Fee Comments: Two identical houses with variations in garage configuration. 1,049.80 1,049.80 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc City of Carlsbad Public Wo r k s — Engineering DATE: BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST PLANCHECK NO.: CB BUILDING ACfDRESS: Z-7 ? f PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:EST. VALUE: £7 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. D A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please see the attached report of deficiencies marked wi)jn D/ Make necessary corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: Date: Date: Date: i//'?/*> By: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: - "" /- Date: . " / - " '-I '-' ATTACHMENTS Dedication Application Dedication Checklist Improvement Application LI Improvement Checklist Q Future Improvement Agreement LI Grading Permit Application LJ Grading Submittal Checklist D Right-of-Way Permit Application D Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet LI Sewer Fee Information Sheet ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: David Rick City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Av, Carlsbad. CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2781 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 n©«(riffi4Bia«t;pn«SBAioc92OOa-7314 • (760) 602-272O • FAX (76O) 602-8562 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN pND oRD D D 1.y Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow fad Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Existing & Proposed Structures </&. Driveway widths Existing Street Improvements *^L Existing or proposed sewer lateral Property Lines £H<^ P^-<- PL.. '&s Existing or proposed water service Easements /v/vJ. Existing or proposed irrigation service is m o ch™«'™ eito riion- f Ao/»«je p - ieAmwe • c^i i./t^>- ^P mD 2. Show on site plan. A. Drainage Patterns >/\. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." ,t!5"C Bi t--Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. 3. Include on title sheet: . Site address B./Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION / ./ Jc. H:\WORO\DOCSVCHKLST\BuiMing Planchrek Cklst Forni (6eneric).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ,87 2 ND 3RD DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE G G 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS G 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: •'• ' - Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 Vz x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: ____^ Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS ED 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the f\ construction exceeds $ _ , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code "/-> \( i//Jr Section 18.40.040. ' i//J Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Buikiing Plancheck Cklst Form (Generic).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST D 3RD D checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by:Date: PA°>"OF '7Yii£ 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $ so we mav prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be s'9ned' notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. public improvements required as follows: D D D 6c. Enetesed please find your -Etrtwe Improvement Agreement, agreement signed and notarized to tho Engineering Department. Please rctyrn- Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adjacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. D D 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). G D ' 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by:Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuiUing Planctieck Cklst Form (Generic).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST D D •)ND 3RD D D D 7d .No Grading Permit required. 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: Q)ft\\/\gUVX , (JJS^. D D 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: D 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. CD 11. D Required fees are attached / (Tpp il£ ^ "H^X) D No fees required WATER METER REVIEW G 12a: Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. • All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. VHAT If \T~1-UHATJ H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuildinQ Plancheck CWst Form (Genertc).doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST •i ST oN RD n • If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. • Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. • If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand, (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: 1. If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 2. 3. 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: • Hydraulic grade line • Elevation at point of connection (POC) • Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) • Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve • Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) • Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\Building Planctieck Cklst Form (Generic).doc ND BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available) 1. Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. 2. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions/this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. 13. Additional Comments: l l*QitL*'nZ~ brf "THE &TE- (*-*-/</ -Trlfi-T FIRE: * ftp, (5 H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\BuiWing Plancheck CWsl Form (Geneiicl.doc ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET D Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. D Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal. Address: X]^ C$&>T ^ Bldg. Permit No. £&&> -3*V J7 Prepared by: $) . R(C^ Date: 11/11/00 Checked by: Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: S&~, Sq. Ft./Units: ' EDU's: Types of Use: • Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's: APT CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use: . Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's: Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: \ ADT's: • FEES REQUIRED: WITHIN CFD: D YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) D NO W 1. PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #: : FEE/UNIT: .. X NO. UNITS:_ = $_ M?f 2. TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADf: = $_ ZONE TRANSPORTATION ADT'S X $10 =$ 3. BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 DIST. #3 ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/APT: =$ '4. FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE: UNIT/SQ.FT.: X FEE/SQ.FT./UNIT: = $_ 5. SEWER FEE '• PERMIT No. SCPTV- "f° ^ N ' ' EDU's: I X FEE/EDU: / V? =$ / BENEFIT AREA: t* Ifr ' DRAINAGE BASIN:77"; EDU's: X FEE/EDU: =$ 6. SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) = $ . DRAINAGE FEES PLDA ': HIGH /LOW ACRES: X FEE/AC: = $_ a)1 <%, VJffTBtL TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES»: $ *NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due. Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits. P:\DOCS\M1SFORMS\FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET REV 4/29/99 8- cn aD J5 .2a. a. \ D PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB Address IB 5^VtS~Tft Planner Paul Godwin APN: Phone (760) 602-4625 Type of Project & Use: tsjgpj .SFft, Net Project Density: ZoningiK^'RSCO General Plan: feJLYY\ Facilities Management Zone: DU/AG CFD /in/nntl # Circle One _Date of participation:Remaining net dev acres: (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: *) Legend:Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action Environmental Review Required: DATE OF COMPLETION: YES X TYPE Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: Discretionary Action Required: YES NO )( TYPE APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE " PROJECT NO. • OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: X Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? If NO, complete Coastal 'PeVmitiDeiefmihation^brm. now; ;*; •"""" Cpastal.Permit:;Determination,Log #L.^.:-.;' :~;.\.'-.-'•?• '• •-'- YES :NO Follow-Up Actions: 1) Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum Floor Plans). 2) Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed. H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BidsPlnchkRevChklst \ Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES A NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 199^3.) Data Entry Completed? YES /\ NO r (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar. Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!)! Site Plan: -1 [~J 1. Provide a fully dimensional site pjan'drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines. I I 2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: D 1 • Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Required Required Required Required 2. Accessory structure setbacks: FrontT •—-~---______Required Interior Side: Reqi Street Side: Required Rear: Required Structure separation: Required CH 3- Lot Coverage:Required V . Height:Required — 30 • Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown 5. Parking: Spaces Required Q. ca.i g Of. Guest Spaces Required [ I Additional Comments C\> Si-k Shown Shown \<?-)- ^ A t' 4-od o.<af 4 ockccl ^ OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst DATE j HRG Engineering 13445 Mango Dr. Del Mar, CA 92014 (800) 900-8585 PROJECT: Eucalyptus Crest #1 SHT. one OF thirty five TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Design Criteria & Loads , 2. Lateral Analysis 3. Beams and rafters 2-3 4-23 24-35 APPROVED BY: ,DATE: THIS SIGNATURE IS TO BE A WET SIGNATURE NOT A COPY DESIGN CRITERIA SHEET 2 OF 3^5 Project: Eucalyptus Crest plan 1 GOVERNING CODE: CONCRETE .ys**' - Masonry MORTAR GROUT: REINFORCING STEEL: STRUCTURAL STEEL: WELDING: LUMBER: GLULAMS: SOIL: UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 1997 EDITION F'c= 2000 PSI (U.N.O.) fm= 1500 PSI (U.N.O.) F'c= 1800 PSI (TYPES) U.N.O. F'c= 2000 PSI (U.N.O.) Fy = 60KSI (U.N.O.) Fy = 36 KSI STRUCTURAL SHAPES & PLATES Fy = 46 KSI STRUCTURAL TUBING (U.N.O.) Fy = 35 KSI STRUCTURAL PIPE (U.N.O.) E70, (TYPICAL) DOUGLAS FIR LARCH #2 OR BETTER (U.N.O.) 24F-V4 FOR SIMPLE SPAN 24F-V8 FOR CANTILEVERS ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE = 1000 PSF ACTIVE SOIL PRESSURE = PER TABLE 18-1A OF U.B.C. OR SEE SOIL REPORT BY HRG Engineering 13445 Mango Dr. Del Mar, CA 92014 (800) 900-8585 3/3S- Project: Eucalyptus Crest Plan 1 Loads RoofDX. Tile 5/8" ply 2X10 @ 16" Total Ceiling D.L. Ceiling L.L. Floor D.L. Floor L.L. Ext. Walls Int. Walls 12.0'psf 2.5 psf 2.5 psf 17.0 psf 5.0 psf 10.0 psf 12.0 psf 40.0 psf 16.0 psf 8.0 psf c/tsT A 11 =* 75> T = . 62 ( Q. = .67 15-26 = 1-0 HPH 13 L = fvVU 4 («a* 1-5* 12.6 * S'J Poor FLOOR - nr = 106 PLr z. riF U :r f2:f I • /5a.FT Roe F '» 1 534 VMAIL^ =^+2-SV 34- V gVg'f^'* U'* ^-t-wV WALLS -s: 1 4-3 ROOF = 23 Wf. rr -^ IS34 23 /9±Lb v,uE: To PORCH RooF (25 P&F) FT. WALLS- FLOOR INT ^ 0,7 4 \AJ = N-S OF L/ME (J) ''(£) = uo E _ FLOOR * r, Zc?= 100 2o HE 4- T T TAW C£ V = - • 44 u/ - . R^S.? I = 1.0 T= C J^LJ±_JLW-" - .\\ V .92 N, I/R a .2* .4 * M = • . 2 * f 2- S- - I 4 , S" ' P&f f^Oof V 20 \0 36- S 36 1010 730 ^ V; Wr 1.7Z 3.4 •f = [UStAlM. - soo V * SOO — 3,47-0 flF \V UfllFT =USB HST 37 LIME E r- SOO s ±L' *•' T7PE \V r fe''^ \Op£*F^ 4 ^Z V \Z fsp)]= Z£4 •U5E ft 403 '* \ 3,34? - 1 I .IS = 3,1 U Hlf 2 To . OUT AMdlystS- floor LINE . AS>S> V . % DUE. =234 -f LF LI ME.'(5) V= * fLF -usj=: sHPC^R WAU TYfE I/PUTT - ^/o 73 HUE. U = 44S" fw =W £1 = 14- S = 444.sa.FT V = 444- * C^ 1T- ^!3 rtf s-s'. U?LIFT = M- = 21 V =r upiirr- MAx , z -v so') ^ - -, V/ L6.TT . ; -USE nsr go ? .//v /.IKE (g I 13' UTEPftL 4NALV&1S . ftOof ( TR\&- f + (?-s/£ *£S J = -f- f f£ 4- DfllFT MAX • fc . X . / in 1IKIE (C) FLOOR . -; I OS" V= RooF UPLIFT s ^ r — j\ =• 120 .S% I?) U A 3s = 3.4- ^ 2-04 io ^ I4, =. ( +• l-oo - 700 FiF w MST 0 13/3-r V ^ /ME/1 MOT FT LINE. — 6 J-A NOT i(? V - (225** 3.4) -h (* -'2/1.4) V 4- ( r.s ' ROOF (il MB F) UPUFT - 23 , f SO \r - lo' ^ U.TOO ,1 U , 7 - 7, v 5 r /i t> z ^ 7 -f - C' ' * SO] = . 4)Lp* I'fDFT s- 4,1^2- Lte* TO HEFT /ft- fo /9iTE.Rr\/TE. z.^ FicoR - I LINE Cfi]. UPLIFT = Ij /f /6PSFJ ,-15 nS LfhJE (A\) V- -- - 2-6, *. l,l\5 L&*E HST 3? f V ,:/ £ MST 1J6SS,m NMTE. v- O.T.M. = R.K = Jo « v- 7' = t>!^ U] 4-* Zo^\* S_ j *• ^/^/^'V 7'' ---L. - - //ff f Z/S^ o.T.n.=10' = * f « s? h.5T 2,7- i/y R.F = - 5 ffs -2. -—^ 'tr )4- ONE- FLooP = 30 £. Cssop -Soo Lrs, |>,L .1 --Z. 'USE 7) P = IV- s- 3f3 PL? UPLI L(=>>14 -rsr.s f?.M. = (M. F I V -f- * 3,332, .23' )!'•£ li * -1 = 3,33? —I R.H. ? }/• L" •D , Koof -U T-s'xr.s" w 3.4 \ + 3,332 = v-= 411- = 3 41,610 4~, - 4*1 £<t t lo' - fa LIFT*- .4- Jg j * /. 33 flf fir f. /?' W - '(V'^16 !R = t /-F + -3 P= uj X .20' .20 •» fir = .r 'USE. IS-S ft'ti ?- 2- SZ. ~ R= - 310 ?LF + op <T 1 G-& -z 10=f f -3. fLF "=• > 0 +2.5 112,'S IP, ir '/ i*"ass T * f/ \] Hlf - I ?=<!• p. R,= L5.FT 5-S' k)-I'O =(HIM.) (24 4 U) = ^^o fl-F i = 1,300 = 5,42,0 = U So tv. HIP * *•<;' (24 +H ) = v ^ 821 fip PLF 4* 10 n, / X. HI? * 3 v = I, 300 ^ =. (LEFT) =, I?' f. I*' U r S fsf * 2- s 1C f IF ft =• T-0 L/Ss M „' -r Us iB.FT. U/i ( *o «^s:/i ( f o 22/i ( 40 s 5-00 P/.F (MIN.-RICHT 2=10 IP ;F_X- '.'J^ (L r ' 120 PiF LfS 1 2- 2.0 1&..TT IB. FT 4- HIP = 14/2 s 3, \-5,l s 2.047 LlSv'.- f ^T/?.) = II.Slo" Lfe-FT HIP f=if.' LJ = U-S ( 4o") - P = £^^1 L = 6,1*10 U-FT HIP Lfl fa v I O I?' ,1* = IZvS' (40} = '3,15?. L6> R B * 4 -f- 3.TS' Pa ^,^ =• 2,32 (Hlf-f, fl, )t .zs (2 \-L"O.( u. * A.*. ?0 + 14 Li. i L = 10-4 PLF \z-s' K, - A Rj, = 2/^IO P^ ->'/£' a M-^« = i vi,fLF s = 13-S' W = IZ (<0 f 12) P _ 2,31o L&s, f?v ^ 5>^ro i**' ^^ S, 2SD Lftj. ^ 2'fSlo. 'r si /fop 5 47RLF i ' 1 I? (HIP* i a / 4- 4 PLF J, R,) ~ 4, t / =• 23^40 1V2 12.) 4 WALL ~ //£ fLF f= h i6.fr OKI U s 1-Ts'Oof f <r •IS » / ' TI j * «( p(tx.1 I ^^ I »">e/? \ 10' = 2^330 i/S-Ff f id P •rJr I.' fj>~ L PLF f?t = '/ r, tt it f if- tffc ptoo* RooF = 204 PLF R, ^.4^0 ft,s 4, S M- FT f=MU PLF Roof - -2,12 LE.-FT fLOOR = I TO PLF U> = \\T34) »3T4riF Roof) ROOF) Li r 1, IZ.' r FH-i T=WAIL V= - FLOOR n? 264 PL? S5 R, - I.T-^ IBs S?^ = UU LBi = 4,110. / FH-2, PLF 't = 2(34) = = )U f 4'(34) = IM fLF I ROOF t ^ 1,6/4' 1C H--2. J: v / ^-^ ^ ,"•'1:; \i .UJ «T —f FLOOR . iow ROO 1,31-1 Hi* 2,0^0 U.FT TLF fJLF HIP - VJ= 8 (34) <?v - S1<? ^ I, HZ. PLF WORTH coarrrY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. AMENDED PRELIMINARY SOILS INVESTIGATION FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION EXPANSION LOTNO.'SS, 9 and 10.. 1858 BUENA VISTA DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA PREPARED FOR MSK DEVELOPMENT ATTO: DONNA WILSON 5142 AVENTD A ENCINAS CARLSBAD, CA 92008 AUGUST 10, 1999 PROJECT NO. CE-5837-A MORTH COUHTY ' COMPACTIONENGINEERING, INC. August 10,1999 . Project No. CE-5837-A MSK Development. .. . . 5142 Avenida'Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 , Attn: Donna. Wilson SUBJECT: Amended Preliminary Soils Investigation Lot No.'s 8, 9 and 10 ' 185 8 Buena Vista Drive Carlsbad, California Dear Ms. Wilson: , . In response to your request, we have performed a Preliminary Soils Investigation for the subject project. It is our understanding that adjoining Lots 8, 9 and 10 will be amended to the proposed six lot sub-division located at 2785 Crest Drive. Recommendations for Lots 1,2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 are presented in our "Preliminary Soils Investigation" dated June 21,1999. Recommendations for Lots 8, 9 and 10 are presented herewith. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the suitability of the site for the proposed development and make recommendations with regard to site grading and foundation design. Briefly, our investigation revealed favorable soil conditions and in our opinion, the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided recommendations set forth in the attached report are adhered to. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted (2) filed Dale R. Regli Registered Civil Geotechnical En sin P. O. BOX 302002 * ESCOXDIDO, CA 92030 * (760)480-1116 FAX (760)741-6568 MORTH COUMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Purpose and Scope 2. Location and Description of Site , 3. Field Investigation ' 4. Soil Conditions 5. Laboratory Soil Testing 6. Recommendations and Conclusions . A. Grading B. Foundations C. Slopes D. * Retaining Walls E. Estimated Paving Section F. Review of Grading Plan 5 7. Uncertainty and Limitations Page 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 5 . 5 6 7 APPENDIX Appendix A; Exploration Legend & Unified Soil Classification Chart Plate No/One ' Plate No. Two Plate No. Three Test Pit Location Plan Exploration Log Tabulation of Test Results Appendix B: Recommended Grading Specifications MORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837-A Pase 1 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE The purpose of the investigation was to determine if the site is suitable for the proposed residential sub-division (Lot No. 's 8, 9 and 10). The scope of the investigation was to: A. Determine the physical properties and engineering characteristics of the surface and subsurface soils. B. Provide design information with regard to grading, site preparation, and foundation .design of the proposed strucrure(s). ' 2. LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SITE The site is located at the west corner or Buena Vista Drive and Crest Drive in the City of Carlsbad, California. Adjoining Lot No.'s 8, 9 and 10 will become part of the proposed six lot sub-division outlined in our previously submitted "Preliminary Soils Investigation", dated June 21, 1999. The three adjoining lots are rectangular in shape and cover approximately 140 feet and 1 79 feet of frontage along Buena Vista Drive and Crest Drive, respectively.. The southwest boundary of the lots is bordered by a single family dwelling and the northwest boundary will aburt Lot No. 7 of the recently planned sub-division. Site topography of the lots consist of predominantly flat terrain pitched slightly downhill to the northeast and east • The site is presently occupied with a single family dwelling and small agricultural greenhouses. The dwelling is generally landscaped with trees, shrub's, grasses, walkways, fences, etc. 3. FIELD -INVESTIGATION The field investigation was performed on July 291999 and included an inspection of the site and the excavation of one exploratory trench, with a backhoe to depths of five feet Location of test pit is shown on the attached Plate No. One, entitled "Test Pit Location Plan". As excavation proceeded, representative bulk samples were collected. In place natural densities and moisture contents were determined at different depths in the excavations and are included on Plate No. Two. Subsequent to obtaining soil samples, our exploratory excavations were backfilled. ; • " MORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837-A Page 2 - 4. SOIL CONDITIONS Loose surficial soils (silty-sands) consisting of old fill and/or plowed ground were found to be 1.5 feet in our test pit excavation. Underlying native soils to depths explored were dense silty- sands of the coastal terrace deposit. ' On-site soils were found to have an expansion index of less than 10 and are classified as being "very low" in expansion potential. Therefore, no special consideration need be given this characteristic. . . . . .. Groundwater was not encountered at the time of our investigation, nor did caving of exploratory trench occur. In addition, due to the dense nature of the underlying sandstone formation at the site, it is our opinion, soil liquefaction is unlikely to occur in the event grading is performed in accordance with the recommendations set forth in this report. 5. LABORATORY SOIL TESTING All laboratory test were performed on typical soils in accordance with accepted test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Tests conducted include: A).'Optimum Moisture & Maximum Density (ASTM D-1557) B). Direct Shear (Remold) (ASTM D-3080) C). Sieve Analysis (ASTM D-421) D). Field Density & Moisture (ASTM D-1556) ' E). Expansion Potential (FHA Standard) Test results are tabulated on the attached Plate No.'s Two and Three, entitled "Exploration Log" and "Tabulation of Test Results". 6. RECOMMENDATIONS .AND CONCLUSIONS General It is our understanding, the proposed dwellings will consist of wood frame construction utilizing slab on grade foundations. ' , In our opinion, the site is suitable for the proposed residential sub-division expansion. Recommendations presented in this report should be incorporated into the planning, design, and construction phases of the subject project. MORTH COCJMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837-A Page 3 6A. Grading General It is-our understanding cut/fill earthwork construction will be performed to create a level building pads to accommodate slab on grade foundations. Furthermore, minor cut and fill slopes constructed at inclinations of 2:1 or flatter are planned. All grading should be performed in accordance with the City of Carlsbad Grading Ordinance and the Recommendations/Specifications presented in this report. Subsequent to site demolition, loose surficial soils (plowed ground/old fill), as indicated on the attached Plate No. Two, should be undercut or removed to firm native ground and recompacted in accordance with the attached Appendix 'B' entitled "Recommended Grading Specifications". Firm native ground may be determined as undisturbed soil having an insitu density of greater than ninety percent (90%) of maximum dry density.. We should be contacted to document firm native ground is exposed and properly prepared prior to filling. A subdrain system should be installed where filling of swales, draws, or canyons is proposed, The location of the 'drain should be determined by the Soils Engineer and/or his representative at the time of grading. ' . Subdrain construction should consist of a 24 inch X 24 inch trench excavated into firm natural - soil. The trench should be backfilled with 1 inch minus crushed rock with a 6 inch perforated pipe (holes down) placed at the center of the rock. The rock should be wrapped in filter fabric to reduce siltation of drain materials. All drains should have a minimum of one percent (1 %) fall toward their outlets. Prior to constructing fill slopes, shear keys should be excavated a minimum of 2 feet into firm native ground, inclined back into slope, and have a minimum width of 15 feet We should be contacted to document keyways were properly constructed prior to placing fill. Natural terrain steeper than an inclination of 5:1 (horizontal to vertical units), should be benched (stair-stepped) to provide a stable bedding for subsequent fill. Sizing of benches should be determined by the Soils Engineer or his representative during grading. All fill soils generated from earthwork construction should be placed in conformance with the attached Appendix CB' entitled, "Recommended Grading Specifications". Should soils to be imported, they should be non-expansive (less than 2% swell) and granular by nature, having strength parameters equal to or greater than the prevailing on-site soils. We should be contacted to inspect an/or test imported soils prior to hauling then on-site to assure they will be suitable for the proposed construction. J MORTH COUMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837-A Page 4 Particles of asphalt and concrete debris, having a diameter of greater than 6 inches, will not be suitable fill material and should be separated from fines during grading and hauled off-site. If encountered, leach lines and'or pipes should be removed. Concrete pipes may be crushed in place. Trench lines should be recompacted in accordance with Appendix 'B1. Temporary slopes steeper than 1:1 ratios to be retained at a later date should be back cut to the standard specifications set forth by CAL-OSHA. To avoid delays during the course of construction, we recommend CAL-OSHA be contacted to determine the back cut slope ratio with regard to the slope height prior to the start of construction. It should be noted, CAL-OSHA may require a slope stability analysis by our firm to verify temporary slopes will be stable during the construction phase of the subject project. It is highly probable the proposed structure(s) wall be traversed by a transition from cut to fill. Therefore, to reduce structural damage occurring from foundations bearing on two different soil types, the following measure should be employed: It is recommended the cut side of the transitional areas be removed to a depth of 1 foot below the bottom of the deepest proposed footing and brought back to grade with properly compacted fill. This will allow the proposed strucfure(s) to bear entirely on a compacted fill mat, thus ] . .. reducing the probability of differential settlement. The removaJ area should extend under and a minimum of 5 feet beyond the proposed dwelling(s). 6B. Foundations General On-site soils are comprised on sandy-materials possessing "very-low" expansion potential and . have above average strength parameters. Therefore, conventional foundations may be utilized, provided the aforementioned Grading Recommendation are adhered to. For One-Story Construction: Continuous footing having a minimum width of 12 inches and founded a minimum depth of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade will have an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot. For Two-Story Construction: ' Continuous footings should have a minimum width of 15 inches and be founded a minimum depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade. /NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5 83 7-A Pace 5 Isolated square footings having a diameter of 18 inches and founded a minimum depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade will have an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2000 pounds per square foot. All continuous footings are to be reinforced with one £4 bar top and bottom. Steel should be positioned 3 inches above bottom of footing and 3 inches below top of footing. Interior slabs should be a minimum of 4 inches thick and reinforced with #3 bars on 18 inch centers, both ways at mid-point of slab thickness. Slab underlayment should consist of 4 inches of washed concrete sand with a visqueen moisture barrier installed at mid-point of sand (2 inches sand, visqueen, 2 inches sand). Sand should be tested in accordance with ASIM D-24'19 to insure a minimum sand equivalent of 30. Foundation set-backs from top of slopes should be a minimum of 8 feet If this cannot be achieved, footings near or on adjacent slopes should be founded at a depth such that the horizontal distance from the bottom outside edge of footing to the face of the slope is a minimum of 8 feet " i Prior to pouring of concrete, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. should be contacted to inspect foundation recommendations for compliance to those set forth. During placement of concrete North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC and/or a qualified concrete inspector should be present to document construction of foundations. 6C. Slopes Cut and compacted fill slopes constructed to maximum heights of 35 feet with maximum slope ratios of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical units) will be stable with relation to deep seated failure, provided they are properly maintained. During grading, positive drainage away from top of slopes should be provided Subsequent to completion of grading, slopes should be planted as soon as possible with light groundcover indigenous to the area. Our slope stability analysis \vas performed utilizing "Taylor's Charts" for cut and compacted fill slopes and a safety factor of 1.5. 6D. Retaining Walls For static conditions, the prevailing soils wall have an allowable equivalent passive fluid pressure of 355 psf, increasing 355 psf per foot in depth. Allowable pressures assume walls are ,-<ORTH COOMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837-A Page 6 backfilled with a non-expansive sand a distance behind the wall equivalent to two-thirds the retained height. Allowable active pressures may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing ; 36 pcf for unrestrained walls. These values assume a vertical, smooth wall, and a level, drained backfill. Should these conditions not be met, we should be contacted for new values. :- Allowable active pressures for restrained walls may be assumed to be equivalent to the pressure of a fluid weighing 36 pcf, plus an additional uniform lateral pressure of 8H. H=height of 1 . retained soils above top of wall footing in vertical feet .i ' Allowable active pressures for retaining walls with 2:1 inclinations of sloping surcharge may be "I . assumed to be equivalent to a pressure of fluid weighing 52 pcf. . • The coefficient of friction of concrete to soil may be assumed to be .35 for resistance to horizontal movement. 6E. Estimated Paving Section Proposed interior streets and driveways are based on an estimated R-Value of 45. The following . ] section is provided for bid purposes only. Actual sections should be determined subsequent to -' ' completion of grading operations. ; Interior Streets Assumed Traffic .Index = 4.5 -; • ' (Light Vehicular Traffic) ' j 3 inches of asphaltic paving on 4 inches of select base coarse on n 6 inches of recompacted native subgrade. 4 ' •* Proposed Private Driveways . ' \ j 2 inches of asphaltic paving on 4 inches of select base coarse on ., 6 inches of recompacted native subgrade. i •'".'•' • All materials and construction for asphaltic paving and base should conform to the Standard Specifications of the State of California Business and Transportation Agency, Department of | Transportation, Sections 39 and 26, respectively. Class n base material should have a minimum R-Value of 78 and a sand equivalent of 30. All materials should be compacted to a minimum of .,_./ ninety-five percent (95%). MORTH COUriTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5 83 7-A .Page 7 Note: The City of Carlsbad may impose a minimum pavement section that may exceed the above estimated section. Rigid Concrete Paving: j 5 inches of concrete reinforced with #3 bars on 18 inch centers, .both ways, on -' 4 inches of Class II base material on 6 inches of recompacted native subgrade soil. !NOTE: All concrete should have a minimum compressive strength of 3250 psi. .All subgrade and base materials should be compacted to a minimum of ninety-five percent (95%). 6F. Review of Grading Plan Approved site and grading plans were not available at the time of our investigation. Therefore, upon their completion, we should review them to assure compliance with the recommendations | f^} presented in this report. . , | 7. UNCERTAINTY A.NI) LIMITATIONS ' ( Surface and subsurface soils are assumed to be uniform. Therefore, should soils encountered I during construction differ from those presented in this report, we should be contacted to provide their engineering properties. responsibility of the owner and contractor to carry out recommendations set forth in this . report ' .• . During our investigation of the subject site, evidence of faulting was not encountered. Subsequent to review of available geologic literature, we feel any faulting in the vicinity of the site may be classified as inactive. However, it should be noted that San Diego County is located in a high seismic area with regard to earthquake. Earthquake proof projects are economically unfeasible. Therefore, damage as a result of earthquake is probable and we assume no liability. We assume the on-site safety of our personnel only. We cannot assume liability of personnel other than our own. It is the responsibility of the owner and contractor to insure construction operations are conducted in a safe manner and in conformance with regulations governed by CAL-OSHA and/or local agencies. MORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-58367-A Pase 8 Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. Respectfully submitted, • North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams Dale R. Regl President . Registered Civi . Geotechnical Engx RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted (2)filed NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. • Soil Testing &. Inspection Services SOIL DESCRIPTION 1. COARSE GRAINED: More than half of material is larger than . No. 200 sieve size. GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVELS More than half of coarse fraction is larger than No. 4 sieve size, but smaller than 3". GRAVELS WITH FINES (Appreciable amount of fines) SANDS CLEAN SANDS More than half of coarse fraction is smaller than No. 4 sieve size. SANDS WITH FINES (appreciable amount of fines) . FTKE GRAINED: More than half of material is smaller than No.200 sieve size. SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit less than 50 SILTS AND CLAYS Liquid Limit greater than 50 HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS •EXPLORATION LEGEND UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART SYMBOL TYPICAL NAMES GW GP GM GC SW SP SM SC ML CL OL MH CH OH PT Well graded gravels, gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines. Poorly graded gravels, gravel sand mixtures, link or no fines. Silty gravels, poorly graded gravel- sand-silt mixtures. Clayey gravels, poorly graded gravel-sand, ciay mixtures. Well graded sand, gravely sands, lirfle or no fines. Poorly graded sands, gravely sands, little or no fines. Silty sands, poorly graded sand and silt mixtures. Clayey sands, poorly graded sand and clay mixtures. Inorganic silts and very fine sands, rock flour, sandy silt or claycy- sih-sand mixtures v.ith slight plasticity. Inorganic clays oflow to medium . plasticity, gravely clays, lean clays. Organic silts and organic silty clays oflow plasticity. Inorganic silts, micaceous or diatomaceous find sandy or silty soils, elastic silts. Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays. Organic clays of medium to high plasticity. Peat and other highly organic soils. ' US - Undisturbed, driven ring sample or rube sample CK - Undisturbed chunk sample BG - Bulk sample V - Water level at time of excavation or as indicated APPENDIX 'A1 NORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES TEST PIT LOCATION PLAN SUB-DIVISION EXPANSION LOT NO. 8, 9 & 10 BDENA VISTA DR. CARLSBAD, CA Jl/510'F /JSEE OUR PKKLIMINARYHSOILS~~IGATIUN IAr«/ .JjJJSE 21, 1999 JJLi\ i5 !ix ' !;-(. V APPROX SCALE 1" = 80' M'- j (3 LOT EXPANSION) j i I • HTEST •f i j ™ PIT *4 j | BUENA • VISTA i PROJECT NO. CE-5837-A PLATE NO. ONE HORTH COUMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. EXPLORATION LOG PROJECT NAME: STIR-DIVISION EXPANSION DATE LOGGED: £7/22/22 ELEVATION: EXISTING GRAPE,TEST PIT NO. FOUR. Depth (Feet) 1- 2- 3- 4- 5. Sample T\pe BG CK Dn- Density (pcO 118.1 Moisture ContaU (%) 5.7 • Passing #200 Sieve 19.8 Sample. Depth 2' Soil Classic cation SM SM Description & Remarks BROWN, DRY, LOOSE, SELTY-SAND (PLOWED GROUND / FILL) (REMOVE & RECOMPACT) YELLOW BROWN, HUMID, DENSE, SDLTY-SAND (FTRMNA1TVE) . BOTTOM OF TEST PIT NOTE: TESTPITNO.'S1THRU3 WERE PRESENTED IN OUR PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED REPORT DATED JUNE 21, 1999 PROJECT NO.CE-5837-A PLATE NO. TWO HORTH COUNTY• COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS OPTIMUM MOTSTTTRE/MAXTMUM DENSITY SOIL DESCRIPTION TYPE Yellow Brown SUty-Sand P4 @ 2' MAX. DRY DENSITY (IB. CU. FT) 131.3 OPT. MOISTURE (% DRY 8.7 SAMPLE NO. F.YPANSTON POTE? P4@2'. CONDITION INITIAL MOISTURE (%) AIR DRY MOISTURE (%) FINAL MOISTURE (%) ' DRY DENSITY (PCF) LOAD (PSF) SWELL (%) EXPANSION INDEX Remold 90% 8.7 1.5 11.3 118.2 150 ,000 0 SAMPLE NO. DIRECTSHEAR CONDITION . . Remold 90% ANGLE INTERNAL FRICTION 28 COHESION INTERCEPT (PCF) 210 PROJECT NO. CE-5837-A PLATE NO. THREE MORTH COUNTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. RECOMMENDED GRADING SPECIFICATIONS (General Provisions) 1. INTENT The intent of these specifications is to provide procedures in accordance with current standard practices regarding clearing, compacting natural ground, preparing areas to receive fill, and placing and compacting of fill soil to the lines , grades, and slopes delineated on the project plans. Recommendations set forth in the attached "Preliminary Soils Investigation" report or • special provisions are a part of the "Recommended Grading Specifications" and shall supercede the provisions contained hereinafter in case of conflict , 2. INSPECTION & TESTING j A qualified Soils Engineer shall be employed to inspect and test the earthwork in accordance with these specification and the accepted plans. It will be necessary that the Soils Engineer or his • . representative be allowed to provide adequate inspection so that he may certify that the work j was or was not accomplished as specified or indicated. It shall be the responsibility of the contractor to assist the Soils Engineer and to keep him appraised of work schedules, changes, new information and dates, and new unforeseen soils conditions so that he may make these certifications. • If substandard conditions (questionable soils, adverse weather, poor moisture control, inadequate compaction, etc.) Are encountered, the Soils Engineer will be empowered to either stop • construction until conditions are remedied or recommend rejection of the work, . - Soil tests used to determine the degree of compaction will be performed in accordance with the following American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) test methods:'- "Maximurn Density &. Optimum Moisture Content (ASTM D-1557-78) * Density of Soil In-Place (ASTMD-1556 or ASTMD-2922 & 3017) 3. MATERIALS . . Those soils used as fill will have a minimum of forty percent (40%) passing a #4 sieve. They will be free of vegetable matter or other deleterious substances and contain no rock over 6 inches in size. Should unsuitable material be encountered, the Soils Engineer will be contacted to provide recommendations. APPENDIX 'B? rsoRTH coaMTV COMPACTION . ENGINEERING, INC. •; r>.-- 4. PLACING AND SPREADING OF FILL The selected fill material shall be placed in layers which when compacted will not exceed 6 inches in thickness. . • Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly blade mixed during the spreading to insure uniformity of material in each layer. When moisture content of the fill material is below that recommended by the Soils Engineer, water shall then be added until the moisture content is as specified to assure thorough bonding during the compacting process. When the moisture content of the fill materials is above that recommended by the Soils . Engineer, the fill material, shall be aerated by blading or other satisfactory methods until the moisture content is as specified. 5. COMPACTION After each layer has been placed, mixed, and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted to not less than ninety percent (90%) relative compaction. Compaction shall be by sheepsfoot rollers multiple- wheel pneumatic tired rollers or other types of rollers. Rolling shall be accomplished while the fill material is at the specified moisture content. Rolling. each layer shall be continuous over it's entire area and the roller shall make sufficient trips to insure that the desired density has been obtained. ' • The fill operation shall be continued in 6 inch compacted layers, or as specified above, until the fill has been brought to the finished slopes and grades shown on the project plans. 6. WALL BACKFILL : ' Backfill soils should consist of non-expansive sand, Compaction should be achieved with light hand-held pneumatic tampers to avoid over compaction and hence cause structural damage. Wall backfill should be compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of maximum density. 7. TRENCH BACKFILL All trench backfill located within structural areas should be compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90%) of maximum density. APPENDIX 'B* MORTH coam-Y COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. October 29,1999 Project No. CE-5837 MSK Development Group 5142 Avenida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92008 Attn: Donna Wilson • Subject: Evaluation of Proposed Watermain Location --;•• Proposed Residential Subdivision ' -;" :'. Lots 1 thru 10 : •" : Crest Drive and Buena Vista Drive .'-;,;•''.' Carlsbad, California • ;; References): 1.)'Treliminary Soils Investigation" prepared by North County . "."•'}'.• Compaction Engineering, Inc., dated June 21, 1999 _'.:•.. ' 2.) "Amended Preliminary Soils Investigation" prepared by North •:•;•''.'•-'•. County Compaction Engineering, Inc., dated August 10,1999 •*:Dear Ms. Wilson: • Per your request, we have reviewed the project waterline plot plan prepared by K & S Engineering. In addition, we have performed site inspection to determine the location of the proposed 8 inch waterline in relation to the existing off-site slope located along the northeast shoulder of Crest Drive. , Our review and site inspection indicates the proposed waterline will be located inside and parallel to the northeast property line of the subdivision. Therefore, the pipe will be set back 30 plus feet from the top of the slope located along Crest Drive. Furthermore, soils exposed in this • area are native costal terrace deposits (silty-sands) with relatively good supporting characteristics. It is our understanding, this area will receive a shallow fill (3 foot fill slope) and the pipe will be bedded less than 5 feet in depth. In our opinion, if the pipe is bedded properly and grading at the pipe location is performed in accordance with the above referenced soils reports, the proposed watermain should not . surcharge and/or impact the descending slope along the northeast shoulder of Crest Drive. P. O. BOX 302002 * ESCONDIDO, CA 92030 * (760)480-1116 FAX (760)7441-6568 ! .'.;.<-••:/ 9 i| l\ -^ \ i. U MORTH COUMTY COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Project No. CE-5837 Page 2 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated Respectfully submitted, North County COMPACTION ENGINEERING, INC. Ronald K. Adams President . Dale R. I ••• ;•; Registered Ci • ~v—:f Geotechnical Engineer 000713 ••;' RKA:paj cc: (3) submitted MSKPLAN 1,2 Carlsbad Climate Zone 7 Concepts West Plans for this MSKPlan 1,2 have been been reviewed. The following Title 24 energy report demonstrates compliance with California's Title 24 energy code for new residential projects. Mark Gallant, CEPE Compliance Method - MICROPAS v5.0 December 13, 1999 Haynal and Company, Inc. 425 W. 5th Ave, Ste. 201 Escondido, CA 92025 (760) 743-5408 Contractor's License #649028