HomeMy WebLinkAbout2795 WILSON ST; ; CB010077; PermitCity of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008
05/24/2001 Residential Permit Permit No:CBOI 0077
Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725
Job Address: 2795 WILSON ST CBAD
Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD Status: ISSUED
Parcel No: 1561424300 Lot #: 0 Applied: 01/08/2001
Valuation: $171,170.00 Construction Type: NEW Entered By: MDP
Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 05/24/2001
# Dwelling Units: I Structure Type: SFD Issued: 05/24/2001
Bedrooms: 3 Bathrooms: 2 Inspect Area:
Project Title: PAHL RESIDENCE Orig PC#:
1845 SF MODULAR HOUSE,528 SF GARAGE Plan Check#:
Applicant:
PAHL LAURA & BRUCE
2803 WILSON ST
CARLSBAD CA 92008
760 729-9233
Owner:
PAHL LAURA &BRUCE
20a WILSON 05/24/01 0002 01 02
CARLSBAD CA 92008 N COP 1721680
Total Fees: $17,866:80 lotàl'Payménts-To Date: $65000 '_'alance Die: $17,216.80
Building Permit / /
F
Add9 Building Permit Fee
Plan Check '
Add'l Plan Check Fee
Plan Check Discdunt q
Strong Motion Fe
Park in Lieu Fee
Park Fee
LFM Fee
Bridge Fee
Other Bridge Fee
BTD #2 Fee
BTD #3 Fee
Renewal Fee
Add'l Renewal Fee \ '
Other Building Fee
Pot. Water Con. Fee
Meter Size
Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee
Red. Water Con. Fee
Inspector:
/ $768.32 'Mte'r'Size \ \ \
$9.00. - - -Add'lReclWater- Con. Fee \ $0.00
/ \
/ $0.00 CFD
'
PayoffFee $0.00
$17.12\,. PFF /' "-V" $3,115.29
$0.00 "r P.0(CFD Fund 11 $2,875.66
\ $o.OÔ L16ene Tax' / / ; $0.00
$0.00 Licene Tax (CFDFund)j / $0.00
\ \$0.o0 rraffic Impact FeK / $432.00
\ $0.0O\,. 'Traffic Impact (CFD Fund) J $488.00
\ $0.00 .SidewalkF / / $0.00
- \ $0.00 INCOthMBlNG TOTAL / $147.00
"$0 R.
.00 .ELECTRICAL TOTAL , / $35.00
$d00 MECHANICALTOTAL / $61.00
( / $0.00 Housing Impact Fe / $2,925.00
N $240O0O Housing inLiu / 10.00
D5/8 /1 ( C, /'. $0.00
$0.00 j' Sewer,Fe- $1,959.00
Additional Fees:,..—' $60.00
-TOTAL PERMIT FEES $17,866.80
FINAL APPROVAL
Date: ______________ Clearance:
NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the imposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively
referred to as fees/exactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must
follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for
processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition.
You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capactiy
changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project NOR DOES IT APPLY to any
fees/exactions of which you have previously been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired.
1IERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT
1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
PLAN CHECK NOO i ()0f77
EST. VAL.
Plan Ck. Deposit
NEW Validated By _ 2 795 Date—LAO /dS 3/
1 PROJECTINFORMAT1ON _______________________________ CA q 2ccp
Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address)
P AQ ct- .2-
Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units 5(-I42-43 jhcE -r LOT Assessor's Parcel # Existiog Use Proposed Use I%Ja ôo-&c roovu& t 2-
Des ription of Work "-..._-.- - Sd. FT
4~&CT Palt(If
#or ones # of B drooms of Bathr ms -
-
Name Address City State/Zip
APPLICANT 0 Contractor. 0 Agent for Contractor Xownev. Agent for Owner .
Name Address City State/ Telephone #
4.. PROPERTY OWNER . ..,,. .. thc P— BO qc cLccAo Ck g—ç o -q-q2_33
Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
S. CONTRACTOR - COMPANY NAME . •0 . .
(Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its
issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law
(Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged
exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars l$50011.
fsc) LtO)
Name Address City State/Zip Telephone #
State License # License Class City Business License #
Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone
State License #
6 WORKERS COMPENSATION
Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations:
0 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance
of the work for which this permit is issued.
0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is
issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are:
Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date__________________
(THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100) OR LESS)
C3 CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as
to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California.
WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shell subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000). in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees.
/ SIGNATURE DATE
7. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION .. . . . .
I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason:
0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale
(Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does
such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is
sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale).
Y I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The
ontractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed
pursuant to the Contractor's License Law).
0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason:
I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. 0 YES NO
IeI have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work.
I have contracted with the_f?Ilowin,q person (firm) tg vide the proposed couctioq (include name I address / phone number / contractors license number):
I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the rrajor work (include name / address / phone
number / contractors license number):
I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type
of work):
PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE j2 DATE 3 - 2J0 - 2.DO ,
COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention
program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO
Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO
Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO
IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
8. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY
I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code).
LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS___________________________________________________________
9. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION . .
I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all
City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit' of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned
property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES,
JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT.
OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height.
EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work
authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned
at any time after the work is commenced for a perLad of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). 3 -21,
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE _____________________________________________________ DATE
WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance
0 -'
City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
For: 12/14/2001
Permit# CB010077 Inspector Assignment: JC
Title: PAHL RESIDENCE
Description: 1845 SF MODULAR HOUSE,528 SF GARAGE
Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD
Phone: 7608028680
Job Address: 2795 WILSON ST
Suite: Lot 0
Location: Inspector:
APPLICANT PAHL LAURA & BRUCE
Owner:
Remarks:
Total Time: Requested By: BRUCE PAHL
Entered By: KAREN
Act Comments CD Description
19 Final Structural
29 Final Plumbing
39 Final Electrical
49 Final Mechanical
Associated PCRs
Inspection History
Date Description Act lnsp Comments
12/10/2001 89 Final Combo NS JC
11/27/2001 89 Final Combo CA JC
10/31/2001 23 Gas/Test/Repairs CA JC
10/22/2001 39 Final Electrical CO JC GROUND WIRE
10/19/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service AP PY
10/19/2001 39 Final Electrical NR PY
10/18/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service CO JC NO WATER IN PIPE
10/10/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP JC
10/10/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor AP JC
10/10/2001 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP JC
10/10/2001 34 Rough Electric AP JC
10/03/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP JC GARAGE ONLY
09/20/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding WC JC
09/20/2001 15 Roof/Reroof AP JC
09/18/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO JC SEE NOTICE
09/04/2001 11 Ftg/Fouridation/Piers AP GG GARAGE END STEEL
Act lnsp Comments
CO JC GROUND WIRE
AP PY
NR PY
CO JC NO WATER IN PIPE
AP JC
AP JC
AP JC
AP JC
AP JC GARAGE ONLY
WC JC
AP JC
CO JC SEE NOTICE
AP GG GARAGE END STEEL
AP GG
AP JC FOUNDATION TO UNIT
AP JC
AP JC
WC JC
PA JC
AP JC
08,5N City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request
- VT For: 10/24/2001
Permit# CB010077 Inspector Assignment: JC
Title: PAHL RESIDENCE
Description: 1845 SF MODULAR HOUSE,528 SF GARAGE
Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: SFD
Phone: 7608035561
Job Address: 2795 WILSON ST
Suite: Lot 0
Location: Inspector:
APPLICANT PAHL LAURA & BRUCE
Owner:
Remarks:
Total Time: Requested By: BRUCE
Entered By: CHRISTINE
CD Description Act Aomments
39 Final Electrical
IV I
Associated PCRs
Inspection History
Date Description
10/22/2001 39 Final Electrical
10/19/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service
10/19/2001 39 Final Electrical
10/18/2001 22 Sewer/Water Service
10/10/2001 17 Interior Lath/Drywall
10/10/2001 21 Underground/Under Floor
10/10/2001 23 Gas/Test/Repairs
10/10/2001 34 Rough Electric
10/03/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
09/20/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
09/20/2001 15 Roof/Reroof
09/18/2001 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding
09/04/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers
09/04/2001 12 Steel/Bond Beam
08/09/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's
08/01/2001 44 Rough/Ducts/Dampers
08/01/2001 65 Retaining Walls
07/27/2001 13 Shear Panels/HD's
07/27/2001 71 Set Ups
06/25/2001 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers
Cflv of Carlsbad
ot: B
Final Building Inspection
Deuildina aine&ina jPlannina CMWD St Lite Fire
- - - {
.1
No 72001
- 1 -- - - - - -
Plan-Check#: Date: 11/27/2001
Permit #: CB010077 Permit Type: RESDNTL
Project Name: PAHL RESIDENCE Sub Type: SFD
1845 SF MODULAR HOUSE,528 SF GARAGE
Address: 2795 WILSON ST Lot: 0
Contact Person: NA Phone:
Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA
Inspected T— Date ,
By: Inspected: 11-29-01 Approved: ' Disapproved:
Inspected Date
By: ____ Inspected: Approved: _______ Disapproved:
Inspected Date
By: Inspected:
-
Approved: Disapproved:
.......................................................................................................................................
Comments:
City of Carlsbad
Final Building inspection
Dept: Building Engineerin9" Planning MWD St Lite Fire
Plan-Check #: Date: 11/27/2001
Permit #: CB010077 . Permit Type: RESDNTL
Project Name: PAHL RESIDENCE Sub Type: SFD
1845 SF MODULAR HOUSE,528 SF GARAGE
Address: 2795 WILSON ST Lot: 0
Contact Person: NA Phone:
Sewer Dist: CA Water Dist: CA
Inspected Date
.
By: _______ _____ _______ Inspected: Approved: 7Di'sapproved:
Inspected Date
By: ____ Inspected: Approved: ______ Disapproved:
Inspected Date .
By: Inspected: Approved: Disapproved:
.............................................................. .......a.,, ........ ..............................................................................
Comments: . .
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building Safety
DATE: 05/03/01
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-77.Revl
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2795 Wilson Street
PROJECT NAME: Pahl SFD
U APP ANT
JURIS
U PLAN REVIEWER
U FILE
SET: II
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Bruce Pahl
P.O. Box 399, Carlsbad,CA 92018
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Bruce Pahl Telephone #: (760) 729-9233
Date contacted: 51'- )c, (by: 1A)-) Fax #: (760) 729-3793
Mail L_—iélephone FaxL —'In Person
LII REMARKS: ORIG. PLANS DISCARDED DUE TO CHANGES.
By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
El GA El MB 0 EJ El Pc 04/24/01 trnsmtLdot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 01-77.Revl
05/03/01
NOTE: The item numbers listed below refer to the numbers from the
previous list. These items have not been adequately addressed. The notes
in bold at the end of each item are to emphasize the remaining problem.
Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the
correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects
(two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing,
corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways:
Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City
of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008,
(760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the
Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil
Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858)
560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly
to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review
by EsGil Corporation is complete.
All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their
preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). For garage drawings.
Project engineer of record to stamp and sign garage framing plans sheets
I and 2.
5. Provide structural calculation, framing and foundation plans for added garage.
Additional corrections may follow.
Show how you will provide lateral resistance at front of garage.
Please clarify the garage framing. Framing plan shows conventional
framing, while detail (4/2) shows manufacturer roof trusses.
Omit framing over modular building or provide state approval for
framing over the modular house.
0) Revise detail (2/2). Provide a seismic joint between garage and modular
house to allow the garage to move independently from the modular house
during the construction.
E) The following anchor bolt requirements shall apply in Seismic Zones 3
and 4, per Section 1806.6.1:
I. The minimum nominal anchor bolt diameter shall be 5/8-inch (for
Seismic Zone 4 only). Note: This will require a minimum distance
from the ends of sill plates to be 4-3/8" (and a maximum of 12").
2. Plate washers (minimum size of 2" x 2" x 3/16") shall be used on
each anchor bolt. Revise note # 8 on sheet 2.
Carlsbad 01-77.Revi
05/03/01
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate:
Yes El No El
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building Safety
DATE: 04/05/01
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-77
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2803 Wilson Street
PROJECT NAME: Pahl SFD
U LICANT
qjUR16.
O PLAN REVIEWER
O FILE
SET: Rev. I
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Bruce Pahl
P.O. Box 399, Carlsbad, CA 92018
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Bruce Pahl
Date contacted: o i (by: ti—
Mail Telephone '-"Fax-.-' In Person
LI REMARKS:
By: Kal Tumalieh
Esgil Corporation
E] GA MB EJ El PC
Telephone #: (760) 729-9233
Fax #: D) 2 3R 93
Enclosures:
04/05/01 trnsmtLdot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 01-77
04/05/01
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-77 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2803 Wilson Street
FLOOR AREA: Dwelling (1843) STORIES: One
Garage (528)
HEIGHT: 17 Ft. (App. per UBC)
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION: ESGIL CORPORATION: 04/05/01
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Kal Tumalieh
COMPLETED: 04/05/01
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire
Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of
the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC,
1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99).
The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted
by ordinance.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
.1
Carlsbad 01-77
04/05/01
Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the
correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects
(two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing,
corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways:
Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City
of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008,
(760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the
Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil
Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858)
560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly
to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be
reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review
by EsGil Corporation is complete.
All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their
preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). For garage drawings.
Plans, specifications and calculations shall be signed and sealed by the
California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation,
for plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction. Specify
expiration date of license. (California Business and Professions Code).
Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall
comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24).
Provide state approved house plans. Please note that only the modular home
foundation is state approved.
Provide structural calculation, framing and foundation plans for added garage.
Additional corrections may follow.
The added garage should be totally independent for the modular home. Please
provide seismic separation between garage and modular home.
CITY SPECIAL REQUIREMENT:
Roof coverings, other than wood shakes and shingles, shall be Class A.
Wood shakes and shingles are prohibited as a roof covering on all new structures
and on all replacement roofs.
New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note
"two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage
and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093).
Carlsbad 01-77
04/05/01
Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar,
panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and is not
directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093).
All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas
that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy).
To speed up the review process note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate:
Yes L3 No U
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
-I
Carlsbad 01-77
04/05/01
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-77
PREPARED BY: Kal Tumalieh DATE: 04/05/01
BUILDING ADDRESS: 2803 Wilson Street
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
BUILDING
PORTION
AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
Valuation
Multiplier
Reg.
Mod.
VALUE ($)
Modular Home 1843 80 0.25 37,782
Garage 528 2O0 12,144
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers __
TOTAL VALUE 49,926
Jurisdiction Code 1Cb IBY Ordinance
Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance V
Plan Check Fee by Ordinance V
I $402.331
I $261.511
Type of Review: Complete Review E Structural Only
Repetitive Fee El Other
Repeats E Hourly Hour(s) *
Esgil Plan Review Fee I $209.211
Comments:
Sheet I of I
macvalue.doc
EsGiT Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building Safety
DATE: 05/09/01 U AP [CANT
JURIS.
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad N REVIEWER
U FILE
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-77.Revl SET: III
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2795 Wilson Street
PROJECT NAME: Pahl SFD
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person. -
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
I Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Bruce Pahl Telephone #:
Date contacted: In Person (by: ) Fax #:
Mail Telephone Fax In Person
El REMARKS:
By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
OGA 0MB DEJ Pc LOG tmsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
V EsGil Corporation
In Partnership with Government for Building Safety.
DATE: 01/18/01 U APPLICANT
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-0019,( SET:I
U FILE
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2SO3 Wilson Street.
'-I
PROJECT NAME: Pahl SFD
The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply
with the jurisdiction's building codes.
The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes
when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff.
The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list
and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck.
The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil
Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.
The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant
contact person.
The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to:
Bruce Pahl
P.O. Box 399. Carlsbad, CA 92018
Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed.
Person contacted: Bruce Pahl (. Telephone #: (760) 729-9233
Date contacted: if CY 10 (by: ) Fax #:
Mail ..2Felephone v Fax In Person
REMARKS:
By: Kal Tumalieh Enclosures:
Esgil Corporation
0 GA MB El EJ 0 PC 01/09/01 trnsmtl.dot
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576
Carlsbad 01-007
01/18/01
PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST
SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES
PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-007 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2803 Wilson Street
FLOOR AREA: 2304 (Dwelling)
667 (Garage)
REMARKS:
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
JURISDICTION:
DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW
COMPLETED: 01/18/01
STORIES: One
HEIGHT: 21 Ft. (App. per UBC)
DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY
ESGIL CORPORATION: 01/09/01
PLAN REVIEWER: Kal Tumalieh
FOREWORD (PLEASE READ):
This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws
regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review
is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections
based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire
Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 1998 edition of
the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC,
1997 UPC, 1997 UMC and 1996 NEC (all effective 7/1/99).
The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted
by ordinance.
The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied
before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3,
1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any
state, county or city law.
To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each
correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc.
Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans.
Carlsbad 01-007
01/18/01
Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list.
Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for
residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in
one of two ways:
Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of
Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-
2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning,
Engineering and Fire Departments.
Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation,
9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver
all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad
Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments.
NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed
by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil
Corporation is complete.
Specify on the Title Sheet of the plans the gross floor area of each element of
this project, including dwelling, garage, carport, patio, deck and balcony. Section
106.3.3.
Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans stating that this project shall
comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which
adopts the 1997 UBC, UMC and UPC and the 1996 NEC.
On the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in
a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2.
REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS
In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require
Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code.
ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS
SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO
FOUNDATION INSPECTION
When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall
prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for
approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section
106.3.5. Please complete the attached form.
Show locations of permanently wired smoke detectors with battery backup:
Inside each bedroom.
Centrally located in corridor or area giving access to sleeping rooms.
Carlsbad 01-007
01/18/01
6. Specify the type ( slider, single hung, etc) for all windows to determine the
following:
Sleeping rooms shall have a window or exterior door for emergency escape.
Sill height shall not exceed 44" above the floor. Windows must have an
openable area of at least 5.7 square feet with the minimum openable width
20" and the minimum openable height 24". The emergency door or window
shall be openable from the inside to provide a full, clear opening without the
use of separate tools. Section 310.4.
Openable window area in habitable rooms must be 1/20 of the floor area and
a minimum of 5 square feet. In bathrooms and water closet compartments,
1/20 of area is required and minimum is 1.5 sq. ft. Section 1203.3.
Note that the discharge point for exhaust air will be at least 3 feet from any
opening which allows air entry into occupied portions of the building. Section
1203.3.
Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in
accordance with Section 2406.4:
a) Doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms,
bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these
compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than
60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. For example in master
bath.
Show the required ventilation for attics (or enclosed rafter spaces formed where
ceilings are applied directly to the underside of roof rafters). The minimum vent
area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required
vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required
and area provided. Section 1505.3.
Cross reference building section (A/A.4) to plans
ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE)
10. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the
service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps,
submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations.
PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE)
11. In the garage, provide an adequate barrier to protect water heater from vehicle
damage. An 18" platform for the water heater does not satisfy this requirement.
UPC, Section 510.3.
Carlsbad 01-007
01/18/01
. ENERGY CONSERVATION
12. The regulations require a properly completed and properly signed Form CF-1 R
to be either imprinted on the plans, taped to the plans or "sticky backed" on the
plans, to allow the building inspector to readily compare the actual construction
with the requirements of the approved energy design.
13. Specify on the building plans all of the mandatory energy conservation
requirements as listed on the enclosure titled, "Mandatory Measures Checklist".
STRUCTURAL
14. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations.
Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building
Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building
official in writing that:
The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report,
The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and
The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and
bearing capacity conform to the soils report."
15. Note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation
inspection. Section 108.5.2.
16. Revise slab on grade reinforcement per soil report recommendation.
17. Provide layer of 2" clean sand under slab on grade per soil report
recommendations.
18. Revise shear wall along grid line B. Provide shear panel on both sides per
structural calculation page 9.
19. Plywood shear walls shall have 3x framing (stud and blocking) and
staggered nails per UBC Table 23A-11-1-1 For:
Plywood applied to both sides and nails at less than 6" 0/c. (Footnote # 2).
20. In seismic Zone 4, aspect ratios are limited to 2:1 for wood shear panels. Table
23-11-G. Check height to width ratio for all shear walls. For example For
example along grid line s 2 and 8.
21. Show location and all required shear wall along grid line 5. See structural
calculation.
22. Shows shear transfer detail where roof truss is perpindular to shear walls. Please
show shear transfer detail shown on structural calculation page 15 on plans and
cross-reference to framing plans. 0
23. Project engineer of record to stamp and sign sheets S-3.
Carlsbad 01-007
01/18/01
Identify all drag trusses on roof framing plan.
Show the location of Beam BM-2 on framing plans.
Verify the tributary area used in design of header # 23
CITY OF CARLSBAD SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS:
New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note
"two roof jacks must be installed" where the water heater is in the one story garage
and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093).
Note "two 3/4" copper pipes must be installed to the most convenient future solar
panel location when the water heater is not in a one story garage and isnot
directly below the most south facing roof. (City Ordinance No. 8093).
All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas
that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (City Policy).
Show on the plans gas piping below slab for island range. See the attached
typical approved detail. Please sticky back the attached City of Carlsbad typical
detail to plans.
To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item
has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc.
Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result
of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and
where they are located in the plans.
Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please
indicate:
Yes No El
The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake
Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to
perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan
review items, please contact Kal Tumalieh at Esgil Corporation. Thank you.
Carlsbad 01-007
01/18/01
SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM
ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME:
I, as the owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector),
certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be responsible for employing the special
inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction
project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5.
Signed
I, as the engineer/architect of record, certify that I have prepared the following special
inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at
the site listed above.
EnglneeYs/Arcflite's Seal
& Signature Here
Signed
1. List of work requiring special inspection:
LI Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection LI Field Welding
LI Structural Concrete Over 2500 PSI El High Strength Bolting
El Prestressed Concrete El Expansion/Epoxy Anchors
LI Structural Masonry El Sprayed-On Fireproofing
El Designer Specified El Other
2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspections listed
above:
3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:
Special inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site.
19.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
NUMBER: 91-46 - SUBJECT: Gas Piping - Island Kitchen Cooktop
EFFECTIVE: 5/24/91
SUPERSEDES: I
SECTION: BUILDING DEPARTMENT
PURPOSE: To establish an approved method for gas piping to an island cooktop.
POLICY: The drawing shown below is approved for this use.
NOTES: 1. ALL SLEEVES TO BE SCH. 40 ABS
GAS PIPING BELOW SLAB TO BE
FACTORY WRAPPED EXCEPT FITTINGS
MAY BE PRIMED AND FIELD WRAPPED
ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING TO BE
INSTALLED AT THE TIME OF
UNDERGROUND PIPING INSPECTION
-SCREENED-----!,.(
VENT V..
OPENING
-
..... V
GAS PIPING S . ..
APPROVED SEALANT V
I .... . .••....
2" SAN, TEE V
311 ABS
2" ABS RISER RISER ,.,-6" MIN.
- , ç . • . d • -' •.. e. .
.- :' • -. .
•
T'x
3t1 ABS
SLOPE UP TOTERIOR
S..
ID
, . S .11.. .•</
_t — -
dq •.: ,,
3X2u SAN.
TEE
\'/1
3'.'CLEAN. OUT CAF
Initiated By: V Approved By: S
Carlsbad 01-007
01/18/01
VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE
JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 01-007
PREPARED BY: Kal Tumalieh DATE: 01/18/01
BUILDING ADDRESS: 2803 Wilson Street
BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-311.1-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN
BUILDING
PORTION
AREA
(Sq. Ft.)
Valuation
Multiplier
Reg.
Mod.
VALUE ($)
Dwelling 2304 City Val. 210,928
Garage 667
Air Conditioning
Fire Sprinklers _
TOTAL VALUE 210,928
Jurisdiction Code cb By Ordinance
Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance I V I $1,009.581
Plan Check Fee by Ordinance V I $656.22 I
Type of Review: E1 Complete Review Structural Only
Repetitive Fee E Other
"IRepeats E Hourly Hour(s) *
Esgil Plan Review Fee I $524.98
Comments:
Sheet I of I
macvalue.doc
of Carlsbad
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
DATE: f 2-3 fo I 75' . PLANCHECK NO.:
BUILDING ADDRESS: (A(.$- 92.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: k)s-Q-tQ ..
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 1 I t/)--I EST VALUE: - /0 V -, , .. .. ..
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I'VYl 19! . APPROVAL
The item you have submitted for review has been I Please s the u
DENIAL fr I
approved. The approval is based on plans, I marked D.ake necessarycorrections to plans
ached report of deficiencies
information and/or specifications provided in your I or spe&fati6s for compliance with applicable submittal; therefore any changes to these items after I codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or this date, including field modifications, must be specifications to thjs ffice for review. reviewed by this office to insure continued
conformance with applicable codes. Please review
carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply
with instructions in this report can result in
suspension of permit to build.
EA Right-of-Way permit is required prior to
construction of the following improvements:
FOR OFFICI L USE NLY
By:
TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMITD4IO
c
cBgf 0rr7
Dte: ~13 /0
By: gA 't,Lte:
By: Date:
ATTACHMENTS
LI Dedication Application
Li Dedication Checklist
Li Improvement Application
Li Improvement Checklist
LI Future Improvement Agreement
LI Grading Permit Application
LI Grading Submittal Checklist
Li Right-of-Way Permit Application
ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON
Name: KATHLEEN M. FARMER
City of Carlsbad
Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: (760) 602-2741
CFD INFORMATION
Parcel Map No:
Lots:
Recordation:
Li Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet
Li Sewer Fee Information Sheet A4
CA 9200-7314. (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 6028@2
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
SITE PLAN
C9 9
3RD
1. Provide a fully dimensioned siteVplandran to scale. Show:
Arrow ight-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets
,,B--Existing & Proposed Structures -,Cr Driveway widths
..<-CExisting Street lmpovements,VO"Ji? Existing or proposed sewer lateral
D. Property Lines 17 Existing or proposed water service
Easements -xisting or proposed irrigation service
Li 2. Show on site plan:
inage Patterns
B,uilding pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one
percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course.
(,/ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive
drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building."
eS
V
xisting & Proposed Slopes and Topography — SAo w 51of efeV&-l/7no q
Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water servicep.i2&-
(s)that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however,
second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception.
ewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per
standards.
,E 3. Include on title sheet:
Site address
Assessor's Parcel Number
Legal Description
For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include:
total building square footage with the square footage for each different use,
existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing,
warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved.
EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
H:W0R0\DOCS\CHKLST\8uiId1ng Planthed, ckls* Form (Geneilc).doc 2 Rev. 7/14/00
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3 rd DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE
E D 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for
ProjectNo.________________________________________________________
E 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date:
DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
fl 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm
drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and
for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15,000, pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40.030.
Dedication required as follows:
Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor
prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2" x 11" plat map
and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and
signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an
application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the
completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the
Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax.
Dedication completed by: Date:
IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be
constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the
construction exceeds $75,000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section
18.40.040.
Public improvements required as follows:
Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public
improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the
appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements
on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan
check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the
H:\WORO\DOCS\CHKLSVBuilding Pancfled 0,1st Form (RIDDLE - HARVEY 7-12-00(doc 3 Rev. 12/26/96
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3rd
checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not
accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted
and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit.
Improvement Plans signed by: Date:
Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad
Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or
O current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $280 so we may
prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement
must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a
Building permit.
Neighborhood Improvement Agreement will include the following:
E Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return
agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department.
Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by:
Date:
EJ El El No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective
improvements found adlacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction
of the City Inspector prior to occupancy.
GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section
11.06.030 of the Municipal Code.
7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading
requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). Ivo J41106 /21'1 52i 0 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate g ading plan prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form
attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading
approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
Grading Inspector sign off by: Date:
0 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even
(if a grading permit is not required.)
U
H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLSrBuiIdirIg Plantheck Cklst Form (RIDDLE. HARVEY 7-12.00(.doc 4 Rev. 9128/00
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3RD
E 7d .No Grading Permit required.
E 0 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan.
MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS
iJ 8. A RIGHT-OFWAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or
private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are
not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying
into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities.
Right-of-Way permit required for:
0 0 0 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad
sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District,
located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can
provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is
on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153,
for assistance.
Industrial Waste permit accepted by:
Date:
000 NPDES PERMIT
Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to. reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by
the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever
occurs
Irst 'quired fees are attached
U No fees required
WATER METER REVIEW
0 0 12a. Domestic (potable) Use
Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized.
Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for
the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used.
All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service.
H:\WORD\DOCS\CHKLST\8uflding PIaned, Mist Form (Generic).doc 5 Rev. 7/14100
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1S1 2ND 3RD
If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then
owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations,
which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons
per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is
attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing
schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit.
Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter.
If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the
installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated
demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit
multiple trenching into the street).
E fl D 12b. irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available)
All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior
to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow
these guidelines:
If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent
improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on
the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in
gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I",
and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should
look like:
.....J -... STA 1+00 Install 2" service and
1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm)
If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the
service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building
plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the
applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case
irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry
Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared,
but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once
you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for
your reference. In general the calculations will include:
Hydraulic grade line
Elevation at point of connection (POC)
Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI)
Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve
Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head)
Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection
3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be
irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with
no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water
H:WORD\DOCSCHkLSTBuling Plantheck Cktst Form (Gene,lc).doc 6 Rev. 7114100
BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST
1ST 2ND 3RD
service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation
services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future.
0 0 0 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is available)
Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above.
If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be
connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For
subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the
improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the
applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water
Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is
there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until
recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego
Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is.
charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a
refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund.
However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and
they must deal with the SDCWA for this.
0 0 0 13. Additional Comments:
H:\WORO\DOCS\CHKL$T\BuIIng Panthedc Cldst Form (GeneX).doc 7 Rev. 7114100
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant.
Calculation based on building plancheck plan submittal.
Address: ?O3 Bldg. Permit No._ 10 /O 77
Prepared by: (Cl.A/f Date: Checked by: Date:
EDU CALCULATlON: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: r> Sq. Ft./Units: I EDU's:
Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: EDU's:
ADTCALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses.
Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADTs:
Types of Use: Sq. Ft./Units: ADT's:
FEESREQUIRED:
WITHIN CFD: 0 YES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee in District #1, reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 0 NO
o PARK-IN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA & #:
FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS: = $_____________
o TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE t-
ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: = 7
O BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE (DIST. #1 DIST. #2 DIST. #3
ADT's/UNITS: X FEE/ADT: =$ _4
o FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE ZONE:_________
UNIT/SQ.FT.: X FEE/SQ. FT. /UNIT:________ =$___________
o SEWER FEE
-
EDU's: X FEE/EDU: I)6 . =
BENEFIT AREA:
EDU's: X = $ zo FEE/EDU:
o SEWER LATERAL ($2,500) = $_______________
o DRAINAGE FEES PLDA :
ACRES: X
HIGH /LOW______
PA(1_P1'L61T0( FEE/AC: =$
o POTABLE WATER FEES
UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE SDCWA FEE IRRIGATION
1 of
Word\Docs\MisformsFee Calculation Worksheet Rev. 7/14/00
1'
-
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET
o 9. RECLAIMED WATER FEES
UNITS CODE CONNECTION FEE METER FEE
TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $
*NOTE: This calculation sheet is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be due.
Dedications and Improvements may also be required with Building Permits.
2of2
WordOocsMisforms\Fee Calculation Worksheet Rev. 7/14/00
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST
O Plan Check No. CB O 001 1 Address \o r- S+-
Planner Greg Fisher Phone (760) 602-4629
APN: Ln tL -42,
Type of Project & Use: Net Project Density: DU/AC
J Zoning: -_\ General Plan: r{\ Facilities Management Zone:
CFD lin/ni,1) #Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:______
I Circle One
(For non-residential development: Type of land used created by
this permit:______________________________________________ C.) C) = C
C) C t (
IL
Lend: 19 Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action
LI F1 Environmental Review Required: YES NO TYPE
DATE OF COMPLETION:
Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:
Discretionary Action Required: YES NO TYPE
APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE
PROJECT NO.
OTHER RELATED CASES:
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:______________________________________________________
Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO X7
CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO____
If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite
200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036
Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt):
Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES NO____
If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now.
Coastal Permit Determination Log #:
Follow-Up Actions:
Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum
Floor Plans).
Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed.
)H :\ADMIN\COUNTER\BIdgPInchkRevChkst)
Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES ' NO
( (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.)
A Data Entry Completed? YES X) NO ____
(A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens,'Housing Fees, Construct Housing YIN, Enter Fee, UPDATE!)
Site Plan:
Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow,
property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing
Street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing
topographical lines.
Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
Zoning:
)4 F~ F-1 1. Setbacks:
Front:
Interior Side:
Street Side:
Rear:
Required
Required
Required
Required
Shown
Shown -
Shown
Shown
UI —Accessory structure setbacks:
Front: —._Required Shown -
Interior Side Shown -
Street Side: Required Shown
Rear: Required Shown
Structure separation: Required Shown -
3. Lot Coverage: Required 407o Shown
LI 4. Height: Required Shown I,
LI LI 5. Parking: Spaces Required , Shown
Guest Spaces Required Shown
LI LI LI Additional Comments
OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER DATE \\kD\
H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst
PLANNING DEPARTMENT It
BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CM050
Plan Check No. CB 01 OO Address S
Planner Greg Fisher Phone (760) 602-4629
APN: IS _14'S
Type of Project & Use: Net Project Density: DU/AC
Zoning: _1?.- \ General Plan: _, y', Facilities Management Zone:
CFD (in/niit #
Circle One
Date of participation: Remaining net dev acres:
(For non-residential development: Type of land used created by
this permit:
Legend: VN Item Complete El Item Incomplete - Needs your action U.. Environmental ReviewRciuired: YES NO TYPE
DATE OF COMPLETION:
Compliance with conditions'of approval?
Conditions of Approval:
If not, state conditions which require action.
Li El Li Discretionary Action Required: YES NO TYPE
APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE
PROJECT NO.
OTHER RELATED CASES:
Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action.
Conditions of Approval:____________________________________________________
.1
El El El Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance
Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES NO'-.,i
'CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES NO____
If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite
200, San Diego CA 92108-1725; (619) 521-8036
Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt):
Coastal Permit Determination Form already completed? YES____ NO____
If NO, complete Coastal Permit Determination Form now.
Coastal Permit Determination Log #:
Follow-Up Actions:
Stamp Building Plans as "Exempt" or "Coastal Permit Required" (at minimum
Floor Plans).
Complete Coastal Permit Determination Log as needed.
H:\ADMIN\COUNTER\BldgPlnchkRevChklst
LKI Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES) NO
(Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.)
Data Entry Completed? YES NO
- (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toIbar, Sáréens, Hgusirg Fees, Construct Housing YIN, Enter Fee, UPDATE!)'
Site Plan: ç
F F1 1. Provide a fully dimensional siteplan drawn to scale. Show: North arrdw,
property lines, easements, ,éxisting and proposed structures, streets, existing
street improvements, 'right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing
topographical lines. -
2. Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number.
J Zoning:
Setbacks:
Front: Required Shown - r
Interior Side: Required . Shown
Street Side: Required Shown
Rear: Required Shown
Accessory structure setbacks:
Front:
Interior Side:
Street 'Side:
Rear:
Structure separation:
Required Shown
Required Shown
Required Shown
Required Shown
Required Shown
Lot Coverage: Required 407n Shown 20 7
Height: Required 36 Shown L 3p
LI 5. Parking: Spaces Required Shown
Guest Spaces Required Shown
LI [II Additional Comments
OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COM DATE
H:\ADMIN\COUNTERBIdgPnchkRevChkIst
.'. ..
Ear th
technics
PREUMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Single-Family Residential Development
Parcel 2, 2803 Wilson Street
• Carlsbad, California
June 27, 2000
PROJECT NO. 2023401
PREPARED FOR:
Bruce Pahl
P.O. Box 399
Carlsbad, California 92018
Earth Technics P.O. Box 891989, Temecula, California 92589 (909) 699- 451 & cdfl
I
I
I
I June 27 2000 Project No. 20234-01
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
At your request, we have performed a Preliminary Geotechnical
Investigation for the above referenced site. The purpose of our
investigation was to evaluate the underlying soil conditions with
respect to the proposed development and to assess the geologic
and engineering constraints that might exist considering this
development.
A prelimianry Site Plan with a building footprint was used to
locate the proposed single-family residence and appurtenances.
Plate 1 presents the lot configuration and Geotechnical data
obtained during our field investigation.
ACCOMPANYING MAPS, ILLUSTRATIONS AND APPENDICES
Index Map - (2000-scale) - Page 2
Geotechnical Map - (20-scale) - Plate 1
Regional Fault Map - (1" = 20 miles) - Plate 2
Appendix A -.Geotechnical Trench Logs
Appendix B - Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Appendix C - General EarthiorR and Grading Specifications
Appendix D - References
Id A.bP
S. .
( :• '• •,4t. 8. /\ '
(2I" 7 '1 ( iiu • .
iJ
A In
Pas
INDEX MAP
L 0 2000 4000
11UFX MAP SCALE feet ()1
PARCEL 2, ?03 W!ISOU STREET
CARlSBAD, CAl trouin
SOURCE: U.S.G.S 71-2 MIN, QUAD. SAN I'll'. 01 9 1 of (P 10 1975)
20234-01
Page 3
2.0 SITE LOCATION/CONDITIONS
The 0.28+!- acre "flag lot" is located on Wilson Street an
improved paved street in the City of Carlsbad. An existing
residence is located to the northeast between the subject parcel
and Wilson Street. Existing houses are located in all directions
except the southwest where vacant land bounds the property.
The lot is partially perimeter fenced with a combination of wood
and chain-link.
At the time of our field work in June 2000, the lot had been
graded to provide a flat building pad. Cuts of 1-1.5 feet had
been made on the northeast, and fills to 1 foot placed on the
southwest.
Overall relief is less than 6 feet descending to the southwest.
The entire site within the proposed building area was weed-free
due to the recent grading. The natural areas to the southwest had
heavy weeds and grasses.
3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
According to the referenced plans the 0.28+/- acre site is to be
utilized for a single-family 1 & 2-story house with long access
driveway.
Minor grading of less than 1 foot is necessary to provide lot
drainage. The grading has created a transition lot from cut on
the northeast to fill on the southwest.
4.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of our investigation included the following:
A review of avai.iab1r, data pertinent to thE's ite, bath......................
published and in-house unpublished data.
Subsurface exploration ut the site utilizing 2 exploratory
trenches to depths as qrnit as 5.4 feet. The trenches were
logged, and these logs appar hi Appendix A of this report.
Sand cone tests were ..r1rnud at critical depths in the
trenches to determine ir-pI.:o densities. Representative
bulk samples were obtain.t !ur testing.
Laboratory testing of rn;rir.ntative earth materials to
develop soil engineerinci ;'1r1-rters for the proposed
development.
20234-01
Page 4
4. Preparation of this report presenting our findings,
conclusions and recommendations concerning site development
based upon an engineering analysis of geologic and
geotechnical properties of the subsoils as determined by
field and laboratory evaluation. -
5.0 LABORATORY TESTING
The following tests were performed for this project in our
laboratory in accordance with the American Society for Testing
and Materials, the State of California Standard Specifications or
contemporary practices of the soil engineering profession.
5.1 Maximum Density - Optimum Moisture Determinations
This test determines, the density that a soil can be compacted to
at various contents. For each soil moisture, there is a maximum
dry density obtained and the associated optimum moisture content.
The results are used to evaluate the natural compaction, control
of the grading process and as an aid in developing the soil
bearing capacity. This is based on ASTM Standard D1557-78 (five
layer method).
5.2 In-Situ Moisture and Density
These tests consisted of performing sand cone tests (ASTM D1556-
64) within the trenches to determine in-place moisture and
density. The results are used to analyze the consistency of the
subsoils and aid in determining the necessary grading to prepare
the pad area.
5.3 Sieve Analysis
This test determines the material grading of the individual
particle sizes and is used in generating an engineering
classification.
5.4 Expansion Testing
The expansion index of the ei are determined by the U.B.C.
Method 29-2 and is used to clesiqn foundations for anticipated
expansion forces.
5.5 Soluble Sulfate
A representative soil sampi' ' tted to determine soluble
sulfate content. The result :ttine to recommended the type and
strength of concrete to be i n construction.
20234-01
Page 5
5.6 Direct Shear
A direct shear strength to!-.t '.'-p; performed on a representative
sample of the on-site soi ls rr'molded to 90% relative compaction.
To simulate possible ac1verce field conditions, the sample was
saturated prior to sheariny. A saturating device was used which
permitted the samples to -Wsorb moisture while preventing volume
change. This test is used to determine soil strengths for slope
stability evaluations and for foundation bearing capacity.
6.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The graded lot has bedrock on the northeast and a thin fill to 1
foot resting on colluvium to the southwest.
The fill was dense with a density of 119.6 pcf (94.4% relative
compaction) at 6.2% moisture.
In-place densities for the soil/colluvium were very low, with a
value of 102.4 pcf (80.8% relative compaction). Densities for the
deeper older terrace ranged from 122.6 pcf (96.7% relative
compaction) in T-2 at 0.5-1.0 feet, to 123.2 pcf (97.2% relative
compaction) in T-1 at 4.0-4.5 feet. Moistures were 3-4 percent
for the soil/colluvium and upto 7 percent for the underlying
Older Marine Terrace.
7.0 GROUND WATER
No ground water was encountered within the site to a depth of 5.4
feet on the lot. No seepage was observed in any of the cut or
fill slopes in the immediate area indicating spring activity.
Historic ground water is 85 feet in the area.
8.0 FLOODING
According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the
County of San Diego, the site is not located within the
boundaries of a 100-year flood plain. The lot currently drains.................
via sheet to the southwest.
9.0 GEOLOGY
The entire site is underlain Lit depth by the fine silty sandstone
and clayey siltstone representing an older marine terrace (Weber,
F.H., 1963; Kennedy, 1977). This formation member is a marine
sedimentary deposit with io: il southwest dips of less than 5
degrees oriented in a N 20-vh iirection No evidence of slope
instability was observed on thr lot or adjoining areas.
The active off-shore trace of tho ?Jewport-Inglewood fault is
located approximately 3.7 milr to the southwest. The site is not
included within any State or unty fault hazard zone.
20234-01
Page 6
10.0 SEISMIC L_SETTING/GRQUNP_MOTION PARAMETERS
The regional seismic settinrj i' shown on Plate 2. The nearest
active fault to the site is tho Newport-Inglewood/Rose Canyon
fault located 6.7 miles soutft,,st of the property (Hart, 1994).
The large size and proximity make this fault the design fault
when evaluation seismic hazard!-7 at the site. According to several
- authors (Rockwell & Lamar, 1&: Kennedy, 1977) the Newport-
Inglewood/Rose Canyon fault has ruptured 2-3 times in the last
1,500 years with an estimated magnitude of 6.5. The 1933 Long
Beach beach earthquake occurred on this branch of the Newport-
Inglewood approximate 26 miles to the northwest.
11.0 HISTORIC SEISMICITY
We have utilized the computer program titled EQ SEARCH (Blake
(1998) to assess historic activity at the site. Based on this
analysis, the maximum ground acceleration at the site from the
period of 1800 to present is 0.38g.
12.0 SEISMIC EXPOSURE
Although no precise method has been developed to evaluate the
seismic potential of a specific fault, the available information
on historic activity may be projected to estimate the future
activity of faults. Based on such plots, recurrence intervals
- for earthquakes of given magnitudes may be estimated. A
probabilistic evaluation of potential seismicity for the site
utilizing FRISKSP (Blake, 1998) indicates a 10% probability of
exceedance of 0.489 in 50 years assuming all seismic sources.
This value is slightly higher than Petersen, et al (1996) based
on the CDNG Probabilistic Evaluation.
12.1 1997 UBC Seismic Parameters
-1
The following UBC seismic design parameters should -be
incorporated into seismic design:
Nearest Active Seismic Source (Type B Fault) - 10.7 km
Soil Type -
Near Source Factor N, - 1.0
Near Source Factor N - l.0
- 13,0 SECONDARY SEISMIC HAZARDS
The dense nature of the und':rIyifiy sedimentary bedrock coupled
with the depth to groundwatP! over 45 feet in the area of the
proposed pad precludes such secondary seismic hazards as
liquefaction, lateral spreedirri tr settlement of the ground the
house is being placed upon. U r'ckIai1 or landslide hazard
exists at the nearly flat sitr.
-.
20234-01
Page
14.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
14.1 Foundation Design
- A strip and spread footing foundation system should provide an
adequate foundation for one and two-story buildings in this site.
All exterior footings should be founded a minimum of 12 inches
below adjacent finished grade for 1-story buildings and 18 inches
for 2-story buildings. Interior footings may be founded a
minimum of 12 inches below finished grade. When the footings are
founded in properly compacted fill or dense older marine terrace,
an allowable bearing capacity of 1500 psf for 12 inch wide
footings is acceptable for dead plus live load. This value may
be increased by one-third for short term wind and seismic loading
conditions.
The footings will have to be deepened on the southwest such that
they extend a minimum of 12 inches into firm Older Marine
Terrace. The depth of these footings will be 48-60 inches below
existing finished grades. One No. 4 bar top and bottom, for a
total of two bars, is recommended as a minimum design.
14.2 Settlement
Our subsurface investigation revealed that the near surface
soil/colluvium is very dense at the near surface. Footings
should experience less than 1-inch settlement with less than 1/2
inch differential settlements between adjacent footings of
similar sizes and loads. This settlement is based upon grading
of up to 30+ feet of fill. If thicker fills are proposed,
settlement could be greater and should be evaluated prior to
placement.
14.4 Concrete Slabs-On-Grade
Sufficient fine-grained materials exists within near surface
earth materials to possible create moisture problems. Therefore,
we recommend that a moisture barrier be placed under any concre€e
slabs that might receive a moisture-sensitive floor covering.
This moisture barrier should consist of a 6-mil polyethylene
vapor barrier sandwiched between a 2-inch layer of sand, top and
bottom, to prevent puncture of the barrier and enhance curing of
the concrete. Nominal reintoruement of the slabs with 6 x 6 -6/6
welded wire fabric is advisable.
14.5 Expansive Soils-Slabs/Concrete Flatwork Design
Expansion testing of near-surtai soils (T-1, 0-3 feet) indicate
the near surface soils have a icr,-, expansion potential per UBC
Table 18-B. The garage and lic,'t ins; requirements are shown in
20234-01
Page 8
Appendix C. Concrete t I .........H"tilil, at a minimum have 6/6 x 6/6
welded fire fabric for irt n-erit. Flatwork adjacent to
moisture sources, such a ou1', or planters, should consider No.
3 bars on 24 inch centers.
14.6 Earthwork Shrinkage, and Subsidence
No additional grading is currently proposed, however, any grading
will result in a shrinkaqe of 5-7% of the soil/colluvium when
replaced as dense compacted till..
14.7 Retaining Wall Design
Retaining walls should he designed using the following
parameters:
Active pressure (level backfill) 47 lb/ft /ft
Active pressure (2:1 backfill) 57 lb/ft /ft
Active pressure (1 1/2:1 backfill) 62 lb/ft/ft
For purpose of lateral resistance , a value of 0.30 may be used
for frictional resistance. A value of 275 lb/ft /ft may be used
for passive resistance for footings placed into properly
compacted fill. Frictional and passive resistance may be
combined, provided the later is reduced by one-third.
Special loads for dead plus actual loads whould be considered in
the driveway/parking area that is retained.
14.8 Lateral Loads
Lateral loads in the near-surface soils are:
Active - 47 pounds per square foot of soil depth (psf/ft)
At Rest - 62 psf/ft
Passive - 275 psf/ft (for wood shoring)
350 psf/ft (for concrete footings)• .•.. .
Active means movement of the structure away from the soil; at
rest means the structure does not move relative to the soil (Such
as a loading dock) ; and Passive means the structure moves into
the soil. The coefficient of friction between the bottom of the
footings and the native soil may be taken as 0.30.
14.9 Trench Stability
The near-surface soil to a di.tli of 5 feet should stand
vertically when excavated, ho'...-ever, trenches in excess of 5 feet
in depth should have the sides laid back at 1:1 in accordance
with OSHA requirements.
20234-01
Page 9
14.9 Slope Stability
There are no exist i.nq ' pr
2 feet. The high streri(jth
vertical) cut and fill s1o,nr U)
instability.
1opes on the site higher. than
allow 2:1 (horizontal to
to 30 feet without gross
14.10 Selection of Shear Strength Parameters
The following shear strength parameter utilized for our slope
stability analysis was detetini.ned by our laboratory test results
as presented below:
Material Friction Angle Cohesion
(Cut or Fill) (Degree) lb/ft2
Anticipated On-Site Fill 27 310
We have utilized values of 27 degrees and 310 lb/ft2 for bedrock
cut slopes although it represents a conservative number,
determined from a remolded saturated sample. Bedrock is expected
to be 20% + stronger (Coduto, 1989)
Even more critical to overall cut slope performance is the
orientation of joints, fractures and bedding. The underlying
older marine terrace has no planes of weakness, and is oriented
in a favorable low dip configuration.
14.11 Drainaae and Terracin
Drainage and terracing should be in accordance with Uniform
Building Code Appendix chapter 33 requirements. At no time
should water be diverted onto the slope face in an uncontrolled
and erosive fashion. Rapid erosion and rutting of the fill
slopes is possible and they should be planted with drought
resistant landscaping as soon as possible.
15.0 GENERAL SITE GRADING
15.1 clearing and Grubbing
The site is currently "weed-free"due to recent grading in the
area of the proposed house and driveway.
15.2 Preparation of Building Pad Areas
The upper 1.5-2.0 teet of soil/colluvium beneath the recently
placed fill in th irea of the house is very loose and will
require removal r mitigation utilizing modified footings as
discussed in Sotion 14.1 "Foundation Dsign".
I
20233-01
Page 10
15.3 Preparation of Surface to Receive Compacted Fill,
All sufficiently dense (90 I"rmt relative compaction) surfaces
which are to receive coinp;iet'd liii should be scarified to a
depth of 6 inches, brought to near optimum moisture content and
compacted to 90 percent relative compaction.' Other softer areas
must be overexcavated to sufficiently dense material and
recompacted. This would include raising existing fill grades.
Overexcavation is required based on our testing to remove the
soft alluvium left in pLice on the southwest, and to remove the
cut fill transition.
15.4 Placement of Comp_a,çted Fill
Compacted fill is defined as that material which will be replaced
in the areas of removal due to root removal, the placement of
footings and paving, and also wherever their grade is to be
raised. All fill should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent
based upon the maximum density obtained in accordance with ASTM
D 1557-78 procedure. The area to be filled will be prepared in
accordance with the preceding section. The recompaction of the
cut material may be waived if field density tests indicate
densities in excess of compacted fill standards.
Fills placed on natural slopes of 5:1 (horizontal to vertical) or
steeper will require a key and benching as shown in Appendix C.
15.5 Pre-Job Conference
Prior to the commencement of grading, a pre-job conference should
be held with representatives of the owner, developer, contractor,
architect and/or engineer in attendance. The purpose of this
meeting shall be to clarify any questions relating to the intent
of the grading recommendations and to verify that the project
specifications comply with recommendations of this report.
15.6 Testing and Inspection
During grading, density testing should be performed by a
representative of the soil engineer in order to determine the
(ir'qre(' ()1 ompact,ion being obt i ned. Where testing indicates
,iiisuLj.,LcieiiL density, aUU1LlonL11 compactive effort shall be
applied with tlicI'll Ij LW. t.inciit of moisture content where necessary,
until 90 percent relative compaction is obtained.
Inspection of ritirr grading control procedures such as keys,
installation or n'd [or subdrains should be made by a qualified
soils eng:i,nerr t nJineering geologist.
20234-01
i Page 11
I 15.7 Development Impact
Provided the recommendations of this report are incorporated into
the design and construction of the residential project, both the
proposed development and off-site areas will be safe from
geologic and geotechnical hazards.
I
GENERAL
All grading should, at a minimum, follow the "Standard Grading
and Earthwork Specifications" as outlined in Appendix C, unless
otherwise modified in the text of this report. The
recommendations of this report are based on the assumptions that
all footings will be founded in dense, native, undisturbed older
marine terrace or properly compacted fill soil. All footing
excavations should be inspected prior to the placement of
concrete in order to verify that footings are founded on
satisfactory soils and are free of loose and disturbed materials
and fill. All grading and fill placement should be performed
under the testing and inspection of a representative of the soil
engineer.
The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in
accordance with contemporary engineering principles and practice.
We make no warranty, either express or implied. Our
recommendations are based on an interpolation of soil conditions
between trench locations. Should conditions be encountered
during grading, that appear to be different than those indicated
by this report, this office should be notified.
I
20234-01
Page 12
Respectful
(<1T IV. 3MA)9
* * rreneL%-/S*erq R.C.E. 305 Director o Geotechnical Services Registratio 1-03 /
WLS/FJ: ss
Distribution: (3) Addressee
ii
I
2'
-
L \ EXPLANATION
I I' OLDER MARINE TERRACE
I
EXPLORATORY TRENCH
IT 2
I
s's' rEEr-
PLATE
/ R1 1 N IP
.
1947
1952
' . . \\
M 6.4 .
.
roj BAR Tow -Z'7
' '. S A c\.N
Aoy sc
- I
1893
1812
19 1
9 \\
•
o
Cc SAN FERNANDO FAULT VGs
1994 A44 0 1769
7 907 1 rIN 185
FAU BEF" IN LOS 1920
l_MtsS,ON
.~ANGELES RIVERSIDE
1933
\r:1 0 C6
SITE
N.
l894\ MI LES I JULIAN
1117, -I0 J) S A N .J_ 0 I" G
Wand 1941
San REGONA% FAULT
M59-6.cY HISTORIC M6.0+ EPICETERS 18)0-1998 1856
AEG — 1973
wius,oq Sc. CAPL58PP
W.O. No: 1f.,AT FIGURE:
'OO I PLATE
—. . J
APPENDIX A
1r0j.ct Name E8JJ1:
"'Project Number 2.02
GEOTECHNICAL TRENCH LOG
Flivetlon 144 *1- Trench No. T 1
Equipment (Aca Jfl Super I Rarkhne
I
GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
is
= - • E C C3
a
o .
Logged by W I shPrling Date 6/21/00
06 • E
•
, •
- • Ui Sampled by W.L. Sherling
0
Sci MD B 119. 6.2 SM ARTIFICIAL FILL - Light yellowish brown 10YR 6/4 silty GS — U sand with minor clay, trace of fine gravel. Dense, •r -
W 102. 37 slightly damp, sharp lower contact with grass line J El K
•
SOIL/COLLUVIUM - Very pale brown 1OYR 7/3 slightly silty
fine to medium sand with trace of gravel. Soft,porous, j dry, gradual lower contact.
4 -
10- BEDROCK - OLDER MARINE TERRACE - Yellowish brown 1OYR 5/4
;M/s interbedded silty and clayey sand with minor gravel. 4 - Dense, slightly damp, occasional thin clean sand beds ½ -
1" thick.
• Vague bedding nearly flat 0 - 4 NE
T. D. 5.4 15 I 111 I I I I NO WATER/MOTTLING
IGRAPHIC LOG trend— scale: Vi
* Test Symbols
B - Bulk Sample
R - Ring Simple
SC - Sand Cone
MD - Maximum Density
GS - Grain Size
SE - Sand Equivalent'
El - Expansion index
(90)- Relative Conatlon
Earth
technics
GEOTECHI
=Proj.ct Name PAHL
4Project Number 20Z34-01
- - 1 - - -
- c
1ICAL TRENCH LOG
Elevation 1A •. Trench No. i 2
Equipment Ust, SRO Siipr I Rarkhne
4
- -j GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
S , U Logged by W.L. Sherlinci
-4 - S S ' ii" Del
CL E .! Sampled by W.,L Sherling
:e 6/21/00
scale: 1t
— -
SCL+ 122.i 53
___ - (96.)---------
-
10-
-
4
15-
GRAPHIC LOG trend -
-1 -
11111 Iti ! III
N
N
N I!
I
* Test Symbols
B - Bulk Sample
R - Ring Sampie._L.
SC- Sand Con.
MD - Maximum Density
GS - Grain Size
SE - Sand Equivalent
El - Expansion Index
(90)- Relative Compaction
Earth
technics
ziI
OLDER MARINE TERRACE - SEE T-1 for description
T.D. 2.3
NO WATER/MOTTLING
I
APPENDIX B
4
MAXIMUM DENSITY - OPTIMUM MOISTURE DETERMINATION
The maximum density was determined in accordance with ASTM
Standard D1557-78. The result by full laboratory curve is
Sample Depth Maximum Optimum IF
Location (Feet) Soil Description Dry Density Moisture 1
T-1 0-2 (Soil Type A) Soil/Colluvium 126.7 10.2
and fill browish gray fine sand
with clay H
T-1 2-4 (Soil Type B) Bedrock
yellow clayey fine sand 118.4 13.6
and clayey silt
SUMMARY OF EXPANSION TESTING
U.B.C. METHOD 29-2
Sample Location Depth Expansion Index Expansion Potential
T-1 0-3' 11 very low
Direct Shear Test Data
Project:
PAHL
Job Number:
20234-01
Date:
6/28100
5
d
LL Actual
Values
U) CL - Best-Fit
Line
-
Cl) --------
a) C
Ct
--
U)
I I --
0 ---------
o Normal Pressure--Kips/SQ. FT. 5
Excavation Number: 'F-i Depth: 0-3'
Saturated Test
27.00 Degrees
c= 31() P.S.F.
APPENDIX C
STANDARD GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
These specifications present Earth Technics Inc., standard recommendations for grading
and earthwork.
No deviation from these specifications should be permitted unless specifically superseded
in the geotechnical report of the project or by written communication signed by the
geotechnical consultant. Evaluations performed by the geotechnical consultant during the
course of grading may result in subsequent recommendations which could supersede
these specifications or the recommendations of the geotechnical report.
1.0 General
1.1 The geotechnical consultant is the owner's or developer's representative on
the project. For the purpose of these specifications, observations by the
geotechnical consultant include observations by the soils engineer,
geotechnical engineer, engineering geologist, and those performed by
persons employed by and responsible to the geotechnical consultant.
1.2 All clearing, site preparation, or earthwork performed on the project shall
be conducted and directed by the contractor under the supervision of the
geotechnical consultant.
1.3 The contractor should be responsible for the safety of the project and
satisfactory completion of all grading. During grading, the contractor shall
remain accessible.
1.4 Prior to the commencement of grading, the geotechnical -consultant shall be
employed for the purpose of providing field, laboratory, and office services
for conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and
these specifications. It will he necessary that the geotechnical consultant
provide adequate testing and observations so that he may determine that the
work was accomplished as specified. It shall be the responsibility of the
contractor to assist the geotechnical consultant and keep him apprized of
work schedules and changes so that he may schedule his personnel
accordingly.
1.5 It shall he the sole responsibility of the contractor to provide adequate
equipment and methods to accomplish the work in accordance with
applicable grading codes, agency ordinances, these specifications, and the
STANDARD GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
PAGE 2
approved grading plans. If, in the opinion of the geotechnical consultant,
unsatisfactory conditions, such as questionable soil, poor moisture.
condition, inadequate compaction, adverse weather, etc., are resulting in a
quality of work less than required in these specifications, the geotechnical
consultant will be empowered to reject the work and recommend that
construction be stopped until the conditions are rectified.
1.6 It is the contractor's responsibility to provide access to the geotechnical
consultant for testing and/or grading observation purposes. This may
require the excavation of test pits and/or the relocation of grading
equipment.
1.7 A final report shall be issued by the geotechnical consultant attesting to the
contractor's conformance with these specifications.
2.0 SITE PREPARATION
2.1 All vegetation and deleterious material shall be disposed of off-site. This
removal shall be observed by the geotechnical consultant and concluded
prior to fill placement.
2.2 Soil, alluvium, or bedrock materials determined by the geotechnical
consultant as being unsuitable for placement in compacted, fills shall be
removed from the site or used in open areas as determined by the .
geotechnical consultant. Any material incorporated as a part of
compacted fill must be approved by the geotechnical consultant prior to fill
placement.
2.3 After the ground surface to receive fill has been' cleared, tit shall be
scarified, disced, or bladed by the contractor until it is uniform and free
from ruts, hollows, hummocks, or other uneven features which may prevent
uniform compaction. V
STANDARD GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
PAGE 3
The scarified ground surface shall then be brought to optimum moisture,
mixed as required, and compacted as specified. If the scarified zone is
greater than twelve inches in depth, the excess shall be removed and placed in lifts not to exceed six inches or less.
Prior to placing fill, the ground surface to receive fill shall be observed,
tested, and approved by the geotechnical consultant.
2.4 Any underground structures or cavities such as cesspools, cisterns, mining
shafts, tunnels, septic tanks, wells, pipe lines, or others are to be removed or
treated in a manner prescribed by the geotechnical consultant.
2.5 In cut-fill transition lots and where cut lots are partially in soil, colluvium
or unweathered bedrock materials, in order to provide uniform bearing
conditions, the bedrock portion of the lot extending a minimum of 5 feet outside of building lines shall be overexcavation a minimum of 3 feet and
replaced with compacted fill. Greater overexcavation could be required as
determined by geotechnical consultant where deep fill of 20+ feet
transitions to bedrock over a short distance. Typical details are given on
Figure D-l.
3.0 COMPACTED FILLS
3.1 Material to be placed as fill shall be free of organic matter and other,
deleterious substances, and shall be approved by the geotechhical
consultant. Soils of poor gradation, expansion, or strength characteristics
shall be placed in areas designated by geotechnical consultant or shall be
mixed with other soils to serve as satisfactory fill material, as directed by
the geotechnical consultant.
t.
He
STANDARD GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
PAGE 4
3.2 Rock fragments less than twelve inches in diameter may be utilized in the
fill, provided: -
They are not placed in concentrated pockets.
There is a minimum of 75% overall of fine grained material to
surround the rocks.
The distribution of rocks is supervised by the geotechnical
consultant.
3.3 Rocks greater than twelve inches in diameter shall be taken off-site, or
placed in accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical
14 consultant in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. (A typical
detail for Rock Disposal is given in Figure D-2.
3.4 Material that is spongy, subject to decay, or otherwise considered
unsuitable shall not be used in the compacted fill.
3.5 Representative samples of materials to be utilized as compacted fill shall be
analyzed by the laboratory of the geotechnical consultant to determine their
physical properties. If any material other than that previously tested is
encountered during grading, the appropriate analysis of the is material shall
be conducted by the geotechnical consultant as soon as possible.
3.6 Material used in the compacting process shall be evenly spread, watered,
processed, and compacted in thin lifts not to exceed six inches in thickness
to obtain a uniformly dense layer. The fill shall be plated and compacted
on a horizontal plane, unless otherwise approved by the geotechiiicál1:...
consultant.
3.7 If the moisture content or relative compaction varies from that required by
the geotechnical consultant, the contractor shall rework the fill until it is
approved by the geotechnical consultant.
3.8 Each layer shall he compacted to 90 percent of the maximum density in
compliance with the testing method specified by the controlling
governmental agency or ASTM 1557-70, whichever applies.
STANDARD GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
PAGE 5
If compaction to a lesser percentage is authorized by the controlling
governmental agency because of a specific land use of expansive soil
condition, the area to receive fill compacted to less than 90 percent shall
either be delineated on the grading plan or appropriate reference made to
the area in the geotechnical report.
3.9 All fills shall be keyed and benched through all topsoil, colluvium alluvium,
or creep material, into sound bedrock or firm material where the slope
receiving fill exceeds a ratio of five horizontal to one vertical, in
accordance with the recommendations of the geotechnical consultant.
3.10 The key for side hill fills shall be a minimum width of 15 feet within
bedrock or firm materials, unless otherwise specified in the geotechnical
report. (See detail on Figure D-3.)
3.11 Subdrainage devices shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances
of the controlling governmental agency, or with the recommendations of the
geotechnical consultant. (Typical Canyon Subdrain details are given in
Figure D-4.)
3.12 The contractor will be required to obtain a minimum relative compaction of
90 percent out to the finish slope face of fill slopes, buttresses, and
stabilization fills. This may be achieved by either over building the slope
and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the
slope face with suitable equipment, or by any other procedure which
produces the, required compaction, approved by.the geotechnical consultant...
3.13 All fill slopes should be planted or protected from erosion by other methods
specified n the geotechnical report.
3.14 Fill-over-cut slopes shall be properly keyed through topsoil, colluvium or
creep material into rock or firm materials, and the transition shall be
stripped of all soil prior to placing fill. (See detail on Figure D-3.)
STANDARD GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
PAGE 6
4.0 CUT SLOPES
4.1 The geotechnical consultant shall inspect all cut slopes at vertical intervals
not exceeding ten feet.
4.2 If any conditions not anticipated in the geotechnical report such as perched
water, seepage, lenticular or confined strata of potentially adverse nature,
unfavorably inclined bedding, joints or fault planes encountered during
grading, these conditions shall be analyzed by the geotechnical consultant,
and recommendations shall be made to mitigate these problems. (Typical
details for stabilization of a cut slope are given in Figures D-3á and D-5.)
4.3 Cut slopes that face in the same direction as the prevailing drainage shall be
protected from slope wash by a non-erodible interceptor swale placed at the
top of the slope.
4.4 Unless otherwise specified in the geotechnical report, no cut slopes shall be
excavated higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of
controlling governmental agencies.
4.5 Drainage terraces shall be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of
controlling governmental agencies, or with the recommendations of the
geotechnical consultant.
5.0 TRENCH BACKFILLS
5.1 Trench excavations for utility pipes shall be backfilled under the
supervision of the geotechnical consultant.
5.2 After the utility pipe has been laid, the space under and around the pipe
shall be backfillcd with clean sand or approved granular soil to a depth of at
least one foot over the top of the pipe. The sand backfill shall be uniforñily
jetted into place before the controlled backfill is placed over the sand.
5.3 The on-site materials, or other soils approved by the geotechnical
consultant shall he watered and mixed as necessary prior to placement in
lifts over the SaI1(l backfill.
STANDARD GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
PAGE 7
5.4 The controlled backfill shall be compacted to at least 90 percent of the
maximum laboratory density as determined by the ASTI Dl 557-70 or the
controlling governmental agencies.
5.5 Field density tests and inspection of the backfill procedures shall be made
by the geotechnical consultant during backfihling to see that proper moisture
content and uniform compaction is being maintained. The contractor shall
provide test holes and exploratory pits as required by the geotechnical
consultant to enable sampling and testing.
6.0 GRADING CONTROL
6.1 Inspection of the fill placement shall be provided by the geotechnical
consultant during the progress of grading:
6.2 In general, density tests should be made at intervals not exceeding two feet
of fill height or every 500 cubic yards of fill placed. This criteria will vary
depending on soil conditions and the size of the job. In any event, an
adequate number of field density tests shall be made to verify that the
required compaction is being achieved.
6.3 Density tests should also be made on the surface material to receive fill as
required by the geotechnical consultant.
6.4 All cleanout, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations, subdrains,
and rock disposals should be inspected and approved by the .geotechñicàl
consultant prior to placing any fill. It shall be the contractor's
responsibility to notify the geotechnical consultant when such areas are
ready for inspection.
STANDARD GRADING AND EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS
PAGE
7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
7.1 Erosion control measures, when necessary, shall be provided by, the
contractor during grading and prior to the completion and construction of
permanent drainage controls.
7.2 Upon completion of grading and termination of inspections by the
geotechnical consultant, no further filling or excavation, including that
necessary for footings, foundations, large tree wells, retaining walls, or
other features shall be preformed without the approval of the geotechnical
consultant.
7.3 Care shall be taken by the contractor during final grading to preserve any
berms, drainage terraces, interceptor swales, or other devices of permanent
nature on or adjacent to the property.
RI
TRANSITION LOT DETAILS
CUT-FILL LOT
NATURAL GROUND
S
-
- -
- -
- 5, j
--------------------- --------------- ,••
COMPACTED F I L L _---.-----
30 MIN.
-------------- OVEREXCVATE AND RECOMPAcT
I S
--•—_-c-
UNWEATHERED BEDROCK OR
MATERIAL APPROVED BY - ___
I THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT
CUT LOT
NATURAL GROUND
REMOVE
UNSUITABLE S
•• .5? .
MATERIAL N.
- ------------------
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30" MIN.
•
IL L.
OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT
[--UNWEATHERED BEDROCK OR
MATERIAL APPROVED BY.
THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT
NOTE: S
Deever overexcavation and recomooction shall be performed
if de'ermined o be necesscry by the geotechnicct consultant.
BENCHING DETAILS
---------------
FILL SLOPE - FILL
--------------
-
-
-
-
-
--------------
-
-
-
----------------
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-.,---------
.
.
-
-
-
-
-
--'-----.---
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-------------.----
-
-
-
-
-
.
—
-------------
---------------
-
-
-
-
PROJECTED PLANE _-_--:-:-:-:-:-----:-1
to I maximum from ioe
of slope to approved ground
•_=. --- REMOVE
---.- ------
UNSU ITA L E
NATURAL
MATERIAL
GROUND
4- IN. BENCH
8 NCH
Ar%___
HEIGHT
MIN (YP0D VARIES
dA
2' MIN. IS' MIN. I
KEY fLOWESTBENCH
DEPTH (KEY)
_COMPACTEDz
FILL OVER CUT SLOPE
REMOVE. NATURAL
. \
UNSUITABLE GROUND
l
MATERIAL \- MINJ BENCH
HENC -
HEIGHT
..-.2%MlN. . (typcal) VARIES . 0
- — -
- - ______ - -
--••.
.— 15' MIN .
LOWEST BENCH
1I -
V CUT
.
FACE
. . .
To be constructed prior
.
to fill placement
NOTES:
LOWEST BENCH: Depth and width su
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
f
i
e
l
d
c
h
a
n
g
e
based c.-, consultant's inspection.
SDRAIJAGE:. -k d:H rncy be required at the
iSCret iOn OT the geotecnnical consultant.
FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR EXPANSIVE SOILS
(ONE AND TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL. BUILDINGS)
EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION INDEX .EXPANSION INDEX
0-20 21-80 81-90 91-130
VERY LOW EXPANSION LOW EXPANSION MEDIUM EXPANSION HIGH EXPANSION
I-STORY FOOTINGS ALL FOOTINGS 12 INCHES ALL FOOTINGS 13 INCHES EXTERIOR FOOTINGS IS EXTERIOR FOOTINGS 24 INCHES
DEEP. FOOTINGS DEEP. FOOTINGS INCHES DEEP. INTERIOR DEEP. INTERIOR FOOTINGS 12
CONTINUOUS. NO STEEL CONTINUOUS. I-NO. 4 BAR FOOTINGS IS INCHES DEEP. INCHES DEEP. 1-NO. 6 BAR TOP
REOUIRED FOR EXPANSION TOP AND BOTTOM. 1-NO. 4 BAR TOP AND AND BOTTOM.
FORCES. BOTTOM.
2-3TORY FOOTINGS ALL FOOTINGS IS INCHES ALL FOOTINGS I. INCHES ALL FOOTINGS IS INCHES EXTERIOR FOOTINGS 24 INCHES
DEEP. FOOTINGS DEEP. FOOTINGS DEEP. FOOTINGS DEEP. INTERIOR FOOTINGS IS
CONTINUOUS. NO STEEL CONTINUOUS. 1-NO. 4 BAR CONTINUOUS. I-NO. 4 BAR INCHES DEEP. I-NO. 6 BAR TOP
EXPANSION TOP AND BOTTOM. TOP. AND BOTTOM. AND BOTTOM.
FORCES.
GARAGE DOOR GRACE NOT REQUIftED. 12 INCHES DEEP. I-NO. 4 BAR IS INCHES DEEP. 1-NO. 4 BAR 24 INCHES DEEP, I-HO. 6 BAR
REAM .
TOP AND BOTTOM. TOP AND BOTTOM. TOP AND BOTTOM.
LIVING AREA FLOOR SLABS 3 1/2 INCHES THICK. NO MESH 3112 INCHES THICK 3 1/2 INCHES THICK. 4 INCHES THICK. 8 2 8-811
REOUIRED FOR EXPANSION 6 S 8-10/10 WIRE MESH AT B X 610110 WIRE MESH AT WIRE MESH AT MID-HEIGHT.
FORCES. NO BASE REOUIRED. MID-HEIGHT. 2 INCHES MID-HEIOH'T. 4 INCHES NO.3 DOWELLS FROM FOOTING
MIt, VISOUEEN MOISTURE GRAVEl. OR SAND BASE. S GRAVEL OR SAND BASE. 8 TO SLAB AT 38 INCHES ON
BARRIER PLUS I INCH SAND. Ull. VISOUEEN MOISTURE MIL VISOUEEN MOISTURE CENTER. 4 INCHES GRAVEL OR
BARRIER LUS I INCH SAND. BARRIER PLUS I INCH BAND. BAND BASE. 6 kilL VISOUEEN
MOISTURE BARRIER PLUS I
INCH BAND.
GARAGE FLOOR SLABS 31/2 INCHES THICK. NO MESH 3 1/2 INCHES THICK. 3 1/2 INCHES THICK. 4 INCHES THICK. 8 X 8-8/6
REQUIRED FOR EXPANSION 8 2 8-10110 WIRE MESH OR 6 X 8-10/10 WIRE MESH OR WIRE MESH OR OUARTER
FORCES. NO BASE REOUIRED. OUARTER SLABS. ISOLATE OUARTER SLABS. ISOLATE SLABS. ISOLATE FROM STEM
NO MOISTURE BARRIER FROM STEM WALL FOOTINGS. FROM STEM WALL FOOTINGS. WALL FOOTINGS, 1 INCHES
REOUIRED. 2 INCHES ROCK. GRAVEL OR 4 INCHES ROCK. GRAVEL OR ROCK. GRAVEL OR SAND BASE.
SAND BASE. NO MOISTURE SAND BASE. NO MOISTURE NO MOISTURE BARRIER
BARRIER REOUIRED. BARRIER REOUIRED. PEOUIREO.
PRE-SOAKING OF LIVING NOT REOUIRED. MOISTEN SOAK TO 12 INCHES DEPTH SOAK TO IS INCHES DEPTH SOAK TO 24 INCHES DEPTH TO
AREA AND GARAGE SLAB PRIOR TO POURING TO 1% ABOVE OPTIMUM TO 5% ABOVE OPTIMUM SE ABOVE OPTIMUM MOISTURE
BOILS CONCRETE. MOISTURE CONTENT. MOISTURE CONTENT. CONTENT.
NOTES: 1) ALL DEPTHS ARE RELATIVE-TO SLAB SUBORADE.
2) SPECIAL DESIGN IS REQUIRED FOR VERY HIGHLY EXPANSIVE SOILS.
FOUNDATION AND SLAB DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
SLAB SUBORADE WIRE UESII.--\ SAND LAYER
VISOUEEN
DOWEl. (WHEN REQUIRED) —_,\\\ SLAB__-\ —ORAVEL OR SAND BASE (WHEN REOUIRED)
a . o
1' /1
REINFORCING BAR
DEPTH OF ( (WHEN REOUIRED)
DEPTH OF >o90 DEPTH OF
INTERIOR b
FOOTING t("
EXTERIOR PRE-SOAKED
FOOTING
QOOcJ
ICal I
SOIL
5;.0 PO0O. J, INTERIOR FOOT(UG-.J
EXTERIOR FOOTING
FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS
JOB NO.: jDATE: IFIGURE NO.:
EARTH TECHNICS'
APPENDIX D
REFERENCES
Blake, T.F., 1998, Computer Services Software, A Computer Program
fo the Probabilistic DeterminatjonPredictjon of Peak Horizontal
Acceleration from Digitized California Faults, FRISKSP, July 1998
Blake, T.F., 1998, Computer Services Software, A Computer Program
to Determine Historical Seismicity from Digitized California
Faults, EQSEARCH, July 1998
Hart, E.W., 1997, Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California,
Calif. Div. Mines & Geology, Special Pub. 42, 35 pages
Ploessel, M.R., Slosson, J.E., 1974, Repeatable High Ground
Accelerations from Earthquakes, California Geology, September
1974
Weber, F. H., 1977, Seismic Hazards Related to Geologic Factors,
Elsinore and Chino Fault Zones, Northwestern Riverside County
California, C.D.M.G. Open-File Report 77-4 LA
Weber, F. H., 1963, Mines and Mineral Resources San Diego County,
County Report 3, C.D.M.G. 309 pages
City of Carlsbad
Building Department,
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION
This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City
prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form.
Project Name: ctkce. FkL kUL) ._-
Building Permit
Plan Check Number:
Project Address: 2_...1c
A.P.N.: i•k LJ _41 -0
Project Applicant
(Owner Name): fftL
Project Description:
Building Type:
Residential: Number of New Dwelling Units
Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling 2.05
Second Dwelling Unit: Square Feet of Living Area in SDU
Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area
Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area
City Certification of
Applicant Information: 'tj'\J\ Date: c[ s( or
SCHOOL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD
Carlsbad Unified School District San Marcos Unified School District
801 Pine Ave. 215 Mata Way
arlsbad CA 92009 (729-9291) San Marcos, CA 92069 (736-2200)
Encinitas Union School District San Dieguito Union High School District
101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 Encinitas Blvd.
Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300) Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491)
Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the
information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended
certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square
footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and
that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is
authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner.
Signature: 1jEcis2c Date:
1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560
Revised 4/20/00
SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION
(To be completed by the school district(s))
THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE
BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED.
SCHOOL DISTRICT:
The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the
developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that
the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school
mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL
DISTRICT OFFICIAL
TITLE
NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT
DATE
PHONE NUMBER
Assistant SuperIntendj UflO3 arisbad Unied Su01 -Dtrict
801 Pine Avenue
Carisbad, Cäiwia 92008
.• !!:.
.
PER Ut) I
III
PER PM .e
'l)6O
'
','t,
I ,
p1ARcEL a2 . PARCEL
3
.
,J •1• t: •"
'4 - - )_;•(I . .•zz 1
---'r- • •• • - - ,•\ •
••- . .•.. .
R3%4 p1pi & t1552.7'OUC •t.: M •.
338 ER PM 26Z4 • (I, 01
JLU . •
. (P
• I ..,
2803 Wilson Street, ((111%/un! 9201J8 ..
:At :
I Parcel II 2 k •.
t4
. •1 •;
ujc 4 L1Ou?Pk I
_IL
'
flJ WdT6:60 TO, se ddd
--S.
CB010077 2795 WILSON ST CBAD
PAHL RESIDENCE
1845 SF MODULAR HOUSE528 SF GARAGE
RESDNTL SFD
Lot#: PAHL LAURA & BRUCE
I BUILDING
I ! /
/'D PLANNING
ENGINEERING
FIRE APPRJFORM
HEALTH DEPT
-lo ø7ou HAZ MAT I AIR QLJAL
33 I 4z ER SEWER DISTR
TO FROM
BLDG GRADING LE1TER.
06') V, APPLICANT APPUCANT
PLAN CORR I
Ck
CFO FORM
PE&MWORKSHEET
BLDG FEES COMPLETE
-
0
1 4edd / /s /o ne
' d4d3S
JF
-. -3-5/ J 6Lh-7
-(.i(-Z7 k4/
/q) Q e
/ 0
•0 . ... - : -. - : 0