The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1280 YOURELL AVE; ; CB063078; PermitCity of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 01-02-2007 Residential Permit Permit No: CB063078 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 1280 YOURELL AV CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Status: 1560310300 Lot #: 0 Applied: $283,403.00 Construction Type: VN Entered By: Reference #: Plan Approved: 0 Structure Type: Issued: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area: RICE: 1990 SF ADD TO 1ST & 2ND Orig PC#: STORY/ 149 SF ADD TO GARAGE / APPROX 300SF EXIST. Plan Check#: Owner: BACKUS FAMILY TRUST 06-27-91 1280 YOURELL AVE CARLSBAD CA 92008 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: Applicant: OSCAR MORA 1237 S. EUCLID ST. SUITE D ANAHEIM, CA2802 714-535-5505 ISSUED 10/25/2006 JMA 01/02/2007 01/02/2007 Building Permit $1,113.28 Add'I Building Permit Fee $0.00 Plan Check $723.63 Add'I Plan Check Fee $0.00 Plan Check Discount $0.00 Strong Motion Fee $28.34 Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 Park Fee $0.00 LFM Fee $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 Other Bridge Fee $0.00 BTD#2 Fee I Ai$0.00 BTD #3 Fee $0.00 Renewal Fee $0.00 Add'I Renewal Fee $0.00 Other Building Fee $0.00 HMP Fee $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Meter Size Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Meter Size Add'I Red. Water Con. Fee Meter Fee SDCWA Fee CFD Payoff Fee PFF (3105540) PFF (4305540) License Tax (3104193) License Tax (4304193) Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) Sidewalk Fee PLUMBING TOTAL ELECTRICAL TOTAL MECHANICAL TOTAL Housing Impact Fee Housing InLieu Fee Housing Credit Fee Master Drainage Fee Sewer Fee Additional Fees TOTAL PERMIT FEES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $76.00 $35.00 $54.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,030.75 Total Fees: $2,030.75 Total Payments To Date: $2,030.75 Balance Due: $0.00 InsiDector: FINAL AP,PRO/sJAL , _____________ Date: /21I2_ /tq Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the'Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions. You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1635 Faraday A ve., Carlsbad, CA 92008 '" " FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO. C'So, 307& EST. VAL.'3, .403-0 Plan Ck. Deposit Validated By Date 77 ' Address (include Bk legal Description U Assessor's Parcel # Secorc escription of Work M1 EE Name PPICANT. ,y Business Name (at this address) Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number es. Existing -v'+ 214.ø-rV SQ. FT ct q #of Stories ..Ltq 4-iOI,_) moro~- Z? . uL 11; .4 Av jl PAM # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms 3o0 44 'X4'e#vt : -c41' 7l3SSDS Address City State/Zip Telephone # Fax # ]j Dfln 6j9 for Owner 4-'41 c4 /Y3 -,-o s Of t13-7 Address City State/zip Telephone # Unit Phase No. Total # of units Use ~QTMP i rz(;;~O,Y66w-Efi CA 7o-7Z ---o 7 2 Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # - - (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter 9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$5001). Name Address City State/Zip. Telephone # State License # License Class City Business License # Designer Name Address City State/Zip Telephone State License # L6 WORKEREM P I LNSATREN * - Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 0 I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No._____ Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for in Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. ,- SIGNATURE DATE OWNERBUFLDERDiARATi thereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale ec. 7044, Business and Professions Coda: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, 'Business and Professions, Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. YES ONO I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number): 1. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number / contractors license number):, I will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): ' /1 • PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE I —'--(--1 DATE \ MEISSE TI FOR A8UILDlNGPERMFSnONL .'77- Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. fL cONSTRUcTIONrLENDlNGAGENcy." I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS__________________________________________________________ I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit' of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not nced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned \x at any time after the work is men d for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE "7-V( _' DATE WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance List 1- Permit-Type From the following list, determine the permit-type that best describes the work you propose to do. Please put the code of that permit-type in the blank at the top of the page on the front of this application. Residential permits (only) also require the identification of the structure-type to be associated with the permit. Choose a structure-type from 'List 2 . Structure-Types' and put its code in the appropriate blank on the front of this application. - Residential Permits Code Description APT Apartments - new construction. .. - CONDO Condominiums - new construction. CVNNR Conversion. Convert all or a portion of a non-residential building to residential use, creating one or more new residential units. CVNRN Conversion. Convert one or more residences in a building to non-residential usage. CVNRR Conversion; Increase or reduce the number of dwelling units in a residential structure through interior modifications (i.e.:_a_four_ bedroom duplex, 2 bedrooms each). _house _converted _to_a_ _with DEMO Demolition permit. (Also specify type of structure from List 2). DUP Duplex - new construction. MOHO Mobile home, renovation, repair, or addition of accessory structure not yielding a new living unit. - - MOHON Mobile home, pre-fabricated house, or trailer installed (plumbed, wired) in a mobile home park (see distinction from single-family residence, below). RAD Residential addition/alteration, creating no new dwelling unit(s). RREISSUE Residential permit re-issue. RREPAIR Residential building repair. Damage, fire, etc. RREPLACE Residential building replacement (no additional units). SFA Single-family, attached - new construction. A one-family house attached to one or more other houses, with one or more common walls extending from foundation to roof at, or forming, a lot line. Has own plumbing and heating system (e.g.: townhouse, row house, half-plex) SFD Single-family, detached - new construction: A one-family house with open area on all four sides. May have an attached or detached garage, or a business. May be a detached 'granny flat'. May be a mobile home or trailer on an individual lot, but not in a mobile home park. Non-Residential/Accessory Permits Code Description COM Commercial structure, new construction. CREISSUE Commercial permit re-issue. CREPAIR Commercial building - repair. Damage, fire, etc. CREPLACE Commercial building - replacement. CII Commercial tenant improvement. DEMO Demolition permit. ELEC Electrical permit, for electrical work only. HOTEL Hotel or motel (including Managed Living Unit hotel) - new construction. HOTELR Hotel renovation. INDUST Industrial structure, new construction. IT! Industrial tenant improvement. MECH Mechanical permit, for mechanical work only. MISC Miscellaneous. Use only if proposed work doesn't fit another activity type. PATIO Patio and/or deck. PLUM Plumbing permit, for plumbing work only. POOL Gunite pools and spas. RETAIN Retaining wall permit. SIGN Sign construction/installation permit. SOLAR Solar energy system installation permit (specify structure type to be served). SPA Factory-made or Gunite. List 2 - Structure-Type (Use with Residential Permit Only) From the following list, determine the type of residential structure that best describes the structure on which you will be working. Please put the code of that structure-type in the appropriate blank at the top of the page on the front of this application. Code Description SFA Single-family, attached. A one-family house attached to one or more other houses, with one or more common walls extending from foundation to roof at, or forming, a lot line. Has own plumbing and heating system (e.g.: townhouse, row house, half-plex). SFD Single-family detached: A one-family house with open area on all four sides. May have an attached or detached garage, or a business. May be a detached 'granny fiat'. May be a mobile home or trailer on an individual lot, but not in a mobile home park. MF2-4 Multi-family, 2 to 4 units. A residential structure on a single lot, containing two, three, or four dwelling units. Units may share master heating, plumbing, or electrical service (e.g.: duplex, triplex, quad-plex). MFS+ Multi-family, 5 or more units. Same as MF2-4, except the building has a t least five attached units on the same lot. MOHO Mobile home, pre-fabricated house, or trailer installed (plumbed, wired) in a mobile home park (see distinction from single-family residence, above). City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 12/24/2007 Permit# C6063078 Inspector Assignment: PY Title: RICE: 1990 SF ADD TO 1ST & 2ND Description: STORY! 149 SF ADD TO GARAGE / APPROX 300SF EXIST. RENOV. Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Phone: 7607295072 Job Address: 1280 YOURELL AV Suite: Lot: 0 Location: Inspector: APPLICANT OSCAR MORA Owner: RICE RUSSELL Remarks: Total Time: Requested By: RUSSELL RICE Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanica Act Comments Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp Comments 12/19/2007 89 Final Combo CO PY GFI @ BATHROOM 12/13/2007 89 Final Combo CO PY SEE LIST ATTACHED 12/11/2007 19 Final Structural NR PY 06/26/2007 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PY 06/26/2007 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP PY 06/14/2007 16 Insulation AP PY 06/07/2007 84 Rough Combo AP PY 04/25/2007 33 Service Change/Upgrade AP PD 03/29/2007 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PY 03/16/2007 15 Roof/Reroof CO PC ROOF OK TO DRY IN CHECK CONNECTION DETAIL HIPS TO RIDGE 01/29/2007 14 Frame/Steel/BoltingMlelding PA PY SUB FLOOR ( 01/29/2007 21 Underground/Under Floor AP PY 01/10/2007 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY NEED SOILS REPORT /230 FIELD REPORT TO A. EuueJl ,elC_c DATEi/ 'Jo I PROJECT NO. ( PROJECT &(J PQ (l1t1 (J ASd -t1 LOCATION /Z k 1 teJ I i 64 CONTRACTOR OWNER' WEATHER CONDITIONS PRESENT AT SITE EQUIPMENT SUMMARY OF INSPECTION: RECOMMENDATIONS: J:ii ~Itlpf ef, 3e, -70 ,c7m Ajj x4o 4 c r /P 6 ,- e~ s h g L a SIGNATURE COPIES TO: t- 6ii L HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • HYDROGEOLOGY 5205 Avenida Encinas, Suite A Carlsbad, California 92008 (760) 931-1917 32242 Paseo Adelanto, Suite C San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 (949) 487-9060 3 EsGfl Corporation In Partners/iip with çovernmentforBui(iing Safety DATE: December 20, 2006 LICA JURIS. JURISDICTION: Carlsbad AN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 063078 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 1280 Yourell PROJECT NAME: SFD Addition & Remodel for Russell Rice The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LII The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. F-1 The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LII The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Oscar Mora Telephone #: Date contacted: 12/20/06 (by: Abe) Fax #: Mail Telephone Fax In Person XX REMARKS: Applicant to carry approved set of plans to the city. By: Abe Doliente Enclosures: Esgil Corporation LI GA LII MB [1 EJ [1 PC 12/20/06 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In (Partners flip with government for (Building Safety DATE: December 14, 2006 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 063078 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1280 Yourell U APPLICANT U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE SET: II PROJECT NAME: SFD Addition & Remodel for Russell Rice LII The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LI The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Oscar Mora 1237 S. Euclid St., Suite D, Anaheim, CA 92802 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has, been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Os r Mora Date contacted ://I 1(by:4/13) Mail 'I' TelephrVA\ V Fax In Person F-1 REMARKS: ) Telephone #: 714/535-5505 Fax #: By: Abe Doliente Enclosures: Esgil Corporation EGA F] MB LIEJ EPC 12/7/06 trnsmtLdot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 Carlsbad 063078 December 14, 2006 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 1280 Yourell DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/7/06 REVIEWED BY: Abe Doliente PLAN CHECK NO.: 063078 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: December 14, 2006 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of prints to: Esgil Corp. or to the bldg. dept. of the juris. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? 1Yes El No li Carlsbad 063078 December 14, 2006 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760)602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Non-structural plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations.. (California Business and Professions Code). This is a reminder to check final sets of plans for signatures. 4. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3. Not clearly shown on the plans. Complete information of sub-items a, b, & c are required. Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. Minimum headroom is 6'-8". Minimum width is 36". 5. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): Complete detail 15 on sheet SD-3. Handrails are required on each side of stairways. Stairways less than 44" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one handrail (if not open on both sides). Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Carlsbad 063078 December 14, 2006 Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." Show the length of all the shear walls as called out in the structural calculations. Recheck the first framing floor plan on sheet A-7. Show the location, type and size (BTU's)of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Abe Doliente at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. I Carlsbad 06 078 November 3 2006 . MISCELLANEOUS how the location of the stairs on the second floor plan. ,../ To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a c o p y ) w h e r e e a c h ,correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or d e t a i l n u m b e 2calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the pla n s t h a t a r e result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, ple a s e b r i e f i describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correc t i c Please indicate: Yes L3 No ?/ The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9 3 2 0 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telep h o n e n u 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have an' questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Abe D o l i e n t Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 06078 November 312006 MISCELLANEOUS T Show the location of the stairs on the second floor plan. /3., To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) w h e r e e a c h correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or deta i l n u m b e r , / ecaIculation page, etc. i/. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans t h a t a r e n o t a 1 result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, p l e a s e b r i e f l y describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this c o r r e c t i o n l i s t ? Please indicate: Yes El No ?J The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located a t 9 3 2 0 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; tel e p h o n e n u m b e r o f 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If yo u h a v e a n y questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Abe D o l i e n t e a t Esgil Corporation. Thank you. EsGil Corporation In cPartners/iip with covernmentfortBui(eing Safety DATE: November 3, 2006 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 063078 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1280 Yourell SET:! []_,APPLICANT - JURIS. O PLAN REVIEWER El FILE PROJECT NAME: SFD Addition & Remodel for Russell Rice • 11111 The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. 11111 The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. LII The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Oscar Mora 1237 S. Euclid St., Suite D, Anaheim, CA 92802 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Oscar Mora Telephone #: 714/535-5505 (u) i,4ft' LIE) Date contacted: ((1,3/o (, (by: k) Fax #: Mail ..—Telephone Fax In Person LI] REMARKS: By: Abe Doliente Enclosures: Esgil Corporation LI GA LI MB [1 EJ LI PC 10/26/06 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 Carlsbad 063078 November 3, 2006 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 063078 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1280 Yourell FLOOR AREA: SFD Addn - 1,990 SF Garage Addn - 149 SF Remodel - 300 SF REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: November 3, 2006 STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 10/26/06 PLAN REVIEWER: Abe Doliente FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 2002 NEC. The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 063078 November 3, 2006 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. . PLANS All sheets of plans must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). 2. Plans deviating from conventional wood frame construction shall have the structural portions signed and sealed by the California state licensed engineer or architect responsible for their preparation, along with structural calculations.. (California Business and Professions Code). . GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.4 (see exceptions): Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. Doors and enclosures for bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface and drain inlet. Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface. 1 Carlsbad 063078 November 3, 2006 EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 4. Provide stairway and landing details. Sections 1003.3.3. Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. Minimum headroom is 6'-8". Minimum width is 36". 5. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): Handrails are required on each side of stairways. Stairways less than 44" wide or stairways serving one dwelling unit may have one handrail (if not open on both sides). Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Except for private stairways, at least one rail shall extend 12" beyond top and bottom risers. Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. 6. The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side as required for one hour fire-resistive construction. Section 1003.3.3.9. FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 7. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. This is required by the city. 8. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. 9. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. This does not apply to detached, single- story dwellings. Section 1804.5 10. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents. (When required by the soil report). - Carlsbad 063078 November 3, 2006 11. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: (When required by the soil report). The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 12. Provide framing sections through the building. Section 106.3.3. 13. Show CB3 (4 X 12) as called out on sheet Cl of the structural calculations. Refer to sheet A-7 of the plans. 14. Show J2 (2 X 12 @ 16" O.C.) as called out on sheet Cl 9 of the structural calculations. Refer to sheet A-7 of the plans. 15. Show the length of all the shear walls as called out in the structural calculations. . MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) 16. Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. 17. Every dwelling unit shall be provided with heating facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 70 degrees F at 3 feet above the floor in all habitable rooms. Show basis for compliance. UBC, Sec. 310.11. . ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 18. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If service is over 200 amps, submit single line diagram, panel schedule and load calculations. 19. Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with NEC Art. 210-52(a). 20. For a single-family dwelling unit (and for each unit of a duplex), show that at least one receptacle outlet accessible at grade level will be installed outdoors at the front and back of the dwelling. NEC Art. 210-52 (e). This receptacle must be GFCI protected. 21. Per NEC Art. 210-11(c)3, note on the plans that bathroom circuiting shall be either: A 20 ampere circuit dedicated to each bathroom, or At least one 20 ampere circuit supplying only bathroom receptacle outlets. Carlsbad 063078 November 3, 2006 . MISCELLANEOUS Show the location of the stairs on the second floor plan. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: YesU No U 25. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Abe Doliente at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. I Carlsbad 063078 November 3, 2006 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 063078 PREPARED BY: Abe Doliente DATE: November 3, 2006 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1280 Yourell BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/U-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) SF0 Addition 1990 121.94 242,661 Garage Addn 149 26.61 3,965 Remodel 300 34.37 10,311 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 256,936 I Jurisdiction Code Icb IBY Ordinance Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: Complete Review Structural Only El E Repetitive Fee Other Repeats Hourly I Hour* Esgil Plan Review Fee Comments: I $1,030.121 I $669.581 I $576.871 Sheet 1 of 1 macvalue.doc o C&p1 Citv of Carlsba Public BUILDING PLANCHECK DATE: lob7lk BUILDING ADIRES"S: /96 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: PLANCHECK NO.: CB (% 3 078 3 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. O A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: 1DEIÜAED Please Ll~,,the attached report of deficiencies marked wit . ake necessary corrections to plans or sped a sfor compliance with applicable codes a'ndstandards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. B ate: ~—Date:— W-K6--A BVT Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT By -.------ Date LATTAC!~A ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON ODedationApplication Name: JOANNE JUCHN I EWICZ 11 Dedication City of Carlsbad Checklist LI Improvement Application Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 LI Improvement Checklist Phone: (760) 602-2775 LI Future Improvement Agreement CFD INFORMATION LI Grading Permit Application Parcel Map No: LI Grading Submittal Checklist Lots: LI Right-of-Way Permit Application Recordation: Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet LI Sewer Fee Information Sheet FABUILDTV raday Avenue . Carlsbad, CA 9200817314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 602-° is BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST TE PLAN ___ - ST ND RD o---- ',2I /./Provide a fully dimensi&nedsitë plan drawn to scale. Show: OY1c, lb North Arrow ®. Right-of-Way Width Structures G.''Driveway widths isting Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral ~A-dj ~ac en LYZ r ov. Oi1L47 I. Existing or proposed water service E. Easements 3 0' J. Existing or proposed irrigation service 2. Show on site A7 !S7 percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. / D. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. 3. Include on title sheet: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION F:BUILOING PLANCHECK CKLST FORMA= 2 Rev. 1114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3R0 DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE EJ 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for V Project No.___________________________________________________________ E 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $_17,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 %" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 0 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $_82,000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the F:BUa.OING PLANCHECK CKLST FORMA= 3 Rev. 7/14/00 1ST 2ND 3RD BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST U A checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: U 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $410 so we -may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: U 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement. Agreement completed by: Date: O 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective improvements found adlacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. I I GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 15.16.010 of the Municipal Code. 0 0 0 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import, export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans. LI 0 0 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading- approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: • Date: 000 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) F:\SUILOINO PLP,NCHECK CXLST FORMA- 4 Rev. 7/14100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD LI LI. 7d .No Grading Permit required. LI 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS - LI LI 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or N private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: LI LI 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad Iv sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: o LI LI 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. /LI LI 11. O eq ired fees are attached No fees required WATER METER REVIEW LI LI 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. F:BUILDING PIANCHECK CKLST FORMA= 5 - Rev. 7/14/00 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). E 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W'. The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and T '- 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (wl a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water I F:BUILDING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc 6 . Rev. 7/14100 114 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND . 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. E 12c. Irrigation Use (where recyôled water is available) Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County. Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. 0 LI LI 13. Additional Comments: F:BUILOlNG PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc 7 Rev. 7114100 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS 04 ~ TIANT JMPROVEMENT RIS1OENTIAL ADDITION MINOR PLAZA CAIRN REAL (<$105000.00) CARL$1AD COIWANY STOR V1LLACU FNRI coLaTI OFP1CI BUILDING OTHER WJkJ aJ.Ni! NCINEER_________________ OATS HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • HYDROGEOLOGY December 20, 2006 Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10567 Mr. Russell Rice 2205 Cameo Road Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Proposed Building Addition 1280 Yourell Avenue Carlsbad, California References: 1. Architectural and Structural Plans, 1280 Yourell Avenue, Carlsbad, California, Sheets A-i through A-7, SD-1 through SD-3 and T-24, by Ram BD&E Inc., September 1, 2006. 2. "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed One and Two- Story Additions, 1280 Yourell Avenue, Carlsbad, California," by Hetherington Engineering, Inc., dated November 10, 2006. Dear Mr. Rice: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the referenced report and plans. Based on our review, it appears that the plans (Reference 1) generally conform to the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report (Reference 2). This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you should have any questions, please contact our Carlsbad office. Engineering, Inc. Jason Geldert Civil Engineer 639l2 I( No.3912 (Expires 9/30/08) t*\F'. Dat* Distribution: 2-Addressee 5205 Avenida Encinas, Suite A • Carlsbad, CA 92008-4369 • (760) 931-1917 • Fax (760) 931-0545 32242 Paseo Adelanto, Suite C • San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-3610 • (949) 487-9060 • Fax (949) 487-9116 www.hetheringtonengineering.com 6 327?d I I PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION >N Proposed One and Two-Story Additions 1280 Yourell Avenue Carlsbad, California u,3063 o'-,7,,c' I I I I I HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. I I I I LI I I I I I I I I . HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • HYDROGEOLOGY I November 10, 2006 Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 I Mr. Russell Rice 2205 Cameo Road I Carlsbad, California 92008 Subject: PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed One and Two-Story Additions I . 1280 Yourell Avenue Carlsbad, California I References: Attached Dear Mr. Rice: In accordance with your request, we have performed a geotechnical investigation at the I subject site. Our work was performed during the period of September through November 2006. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate geologic and soil conditions in the area of the proposed additions, and to provide grading and foundation I recommendations for the proposed construction. Our scope of work included the following: I . Research and review of available plans, geologic literature and aerial photographs pertinent to the site (see References). Subsurface exploration consisting of two hand auger borings for soil sampling and I . geologic observation. Laboratory testing of samples obtained from the subsurface exploration. I . Engineering and geologic analysis. Preparation of this report providing the results of our field and laboratory work, I . analyses, and our conclusions and recommendations. I SITE DESCRIPTION The subject site is located at 1280 Yourell Avenue in the City of Carlsbad, California (see I Location Map, Figure 1). The site consists of a rectangular shaped lot with an existing one-story residence within the central portion of the lot (see Plot Plan, Figure 2). The existing residence is apparently founded on conventional continuous/spread footings with raised wood floors. A concrete patio with an aluminum cover is located in the rear yard I 5205 Avenida Encinas, Suite A • Carlsbad, CA 92008-4369 • (760) 931-1917 • Fax (760) 931-0545 32242 Paseo Adelanto, Suite C • San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-3610 • (949) 487-9060 • Fax (949) 487-9116 www.hetheringtonengineeriflg.com ST SE (4 F FIRE 4VLPNTATh ST PAa 7 ' c 'CA,I, ST IAPAT T - -< --'-,-. j Ml P1 i- * I ' 4ALO- lie TOWN IVY 4 yp, - \/f R ISTA W - 94R, PACIFIC CL AM - NORTH Ca4S7 F, ' .P PACKARD -- c-. — - P —14 NA 5) 5)C ' ( az - PLAZA DR •- (•.•- - Th •RET7TTEsT PLAZA /, CJE$AE '_4 :. CC ,. R1 ____ • $ \ SITE -Ff CA PLAZA B - 'PAW rCA - 5UTW A 'A i' -4 , 4 -- < ER1REE yoo-. . HILL IA ~DREST AV is & \• q4 . • ± A - '\ •'\-F'51A 'LASCFL0RLS C ) CA 4 0R - - I- c BUENA Vl I ST ' •Ip Lh P 44 a DR PS 4 CR \ •C APJ9S I RAVI CFS CV ç )BC HESTRJT R -4 11SF - - T ADAPTED FROM: FROM: The Thomas Guide, San Diego County, 2006 Edition, Page 1106 I SCALE: 1- 2000 (1 Grid = 0.5 x 0.5 miles) LOCATION MAP 1280 Youre!l Avenue HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Carlsbad, California GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 5656.1 1 FIGURE NO. 1 PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 November 10, 2006 Page 2 along the eastern portion of the residence. A metal shed is located within the northeastern corner of the rear yard and a wood lattice garden type structure is centrally located along the northern property line. Landscaping is predominantly a lawn that covers almost the entire undeveloped portion of the property with some bushes and trees. A brick lined planter is located adjacent to the perimeter of the residence. The site is bounded by Yourell Avenue to the south, developed residential lots to the east I and west at similar elevations, and undeveloped property to the north. Topographically, the property slopes gently to the southwest, which appears to be similar to the topography of the undeveloped property to the north. I PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT I Based on a review of the architectural plans, prepared by Ram BD&E, Inc. (Reference 10) and a conversation with you, we understand that proposed construction consists of a two-story building addition to the northern (rear) portion of the existing residence, a one- story garage addition to the east side of the existing garage and widening of the existing concrete driveway. The approximatelocations of the proposed construction are indicated on the Plot Plan, Figure 2. We understand that the building additions will consist of I wood-frame construction founded on conventional continuous/spread footings with raised wood floors for the living areas of the building addition, and a slab-on-grade floor for the garage. We anticipate that building loads will be typical for this type of relatively light I construction. All construction will be at approximate existing site grades. No significant grading is anticipated. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION I Subsurface conditions were explored by excavating two hand auger borings to depths of approximately 5 to 7-feet below existing site grades. The approximate locations of the hand auger borings are shown on the attached Plot Plan, Figure 2. I The subsurface exploration was supervised by a geologist from this office, who visually classified the soil, and obtained relatively undisturbed and bulk samples for laboratory I testing. The soils were visually classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Classifications are shown on the attached Boring Logs, Figure 3. I I I HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. I I I I I I PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 November 10, 2006 Page 3 LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing was performed on samples obtained during the subsurface exploration. Laboratory tests performed consisted of the following: Sulfate Content (EPA 9038) Expansion (ASTM: D 4829) Direct Shear (ASTM: D 3080) Dry Density and Moisture Content (ASTM: D 2216) Results of the dry density and moisture content determinations are presented on the Boring Logs, Figure 3. The remaining laboratory test results are presented on Figure 4. SOIL AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS 1. Geologic Setting The subject site lies within the marine terrace that is contained within the coastal plain region of northern San Diego County, California. The coastal plain region is characterized by numerous regressive marine terraces of Pleistocene age that have been established above wave-cut platforms of underlying Eocene bedrock and were formed during glacio-eustatic changes in sea-level. The terraces extend from areas of higher elevations east of the site and descend generally west-southwest in a "stairstep" fashion down to the present day coastline. These marine terraces increase in age eastward. The site area is contained within the west central portion of the USGS San Luis Rey 7-1/2 minute quadrangle; The Pleistocene marine terrace underlies the entire site. The Santiago Formation is exposed within the steep bluffs to the north and east of the site. It is anticipated that this formation underlies the terrace deposits at depth. Structurally, bedding within the terrace deposits is considered to be massive. No known or reported active or potentially active faults exist within the site vicinity, and the site is not located within the presently defined limits of an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No known or reported deep-seated landsliding is known to exist on the site. A moderate sized landslide deposit has been mapped within the steep bluff to the north of the site, however, this is approximately 500-feet from the site. In our opinion, this landslide deposit poses no geologic hazard to the subject site. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 November 10, 2006 Page 4 2. Observed Geologic Units Topsoil -Approximately 1-foot of topsoil mantles the site. The observed topsoil is generally comprised of dry, loose, brown silty fine to medium sand. The topsoil is not considered suitable for support of fill or improvements. Terrace Deposits - The entire site is underlain by terrace deposits. The upper 1- foot of the terrace deposits is slightly weathered and the terrace deposits consist of moist, medium dense to dense, orange-brown fine to medium slightly silty sand. 3. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered in the hand auger borings, at the time of our work. It should be noted, however, that fluctuations in the amount and level of groundwater might occur due to variations in rainfall, irrigation and other factors that may not have been evident at the time of our field investigation. SEISMICITY The site is within the seismically active southern California region. There are, however, no known active or potentially active faults presently mapped that pass through the site. Active fault zones currently mapped within the general site region include the offshore extension of the Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood, offshore Coronado Bank/Palos Verdes Hills and the Elsinore (Julian Segment), which are located approximately 5-miles (8-kilometers) southwest, 21-miles (34-kilometers) southwest and 23-miles (37- kilometers) northeast from the site, respectively. Strong ground motion could also be expected from earthquakes occurring along the offshore San Diego Trough, San Jacinto and San Andreas fault zones, which lie approximately 30-miles southwest, 48-miles northeast and 60. to 70-miles northeast of the site, respectively. The following table lists the known active faults that would have the most significant 'impact on the site: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 November 10, 2006 Page Maximum Probable Fault Earthquake Shp Rate Fault (Moment Magnitude) (mm/year) Type Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood (5-miles/8-kilometers SW) 7.2 1.5 B Coronado Bank/Palos Verdes Hills (21-miles/34-kilometers SW) 7.6 3 B Elsinore (Julian Segment) (23-miles/37-kilometers NE) 1 7.1 5 A SEISMIC EFFECTS Ground Motions The most significant probable earthquake to affect the property would be a 7.2 magnitude earthquake on the Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood fault. Depiction of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis utilizing a consensus of historical seismic data and the respective regional geologic conditions that are shown on "The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Maps" (Reference 3) indicates that peak ground accelerations of about 0.30 to 0.33g are possible with a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50-years. Landsliding Review of the referenced geologic literature indicates that the subject property has no previously mapped ancient landslide deposits. The risk of seismically induced landsliding affecting the site is considered low due to the gently sloping topography. Ground Cracks The risk of fault surface rupture due to active faulting is considered low due to the I absence of an active fault on site. Ground cracks due to shaking from seismic events in the region are possible, as with all of southern California. L I I HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC I PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I . Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 November 10, 2006 i Page I 4. Liquefaction The risk of seismically induced liquefaction within the site is considered low due to I the lack of shallow groundwater and the relatively dense nature of the underlying terrace deposits. 5. Tsunamis The risk for seismically generated ocean waves to affect the site is considered low due to the elevation of the site above sea level. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS General Based on the results of our preliminary geotechnical investigation, the proposed construction is considered feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Grading and foundation plans should take into account the appropriate geotechnical features of the site. Assuming that the conclusions and recommendations provided in this report are implemented during design and construction, the proposed construction is not expected to adversely impact existing adjacent properties from a geotechnical standpoint. Seismic Parameters for Structural Design Seismic considerations that should be used for structural design at the site include the following: Ground Motion - The proposed additions should be designed and constructed to resist the effects of seismic ground motions as provided in Chapter 16, Division IV of the 2001 California Building Code. The basis for the design is dependent on and considers seismic zoning, site characteristics, occupancy, configuration, structural system and building height. Soil Profile Type - In accordance with Section 1629.3.1, Table 16-J, and the underlying geologic conditions, a site Soil Profile of Type SD is considered appropriate for the subject property. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. I I PRELIMINARY GEOTECEThICAL INVESTIGATION I Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 November 10, 2006 I Page Seismic Zone - In accordance with Section 1629.1 and Figure 16-2, the subject site is situated within Seismic Zone 4. Seismic Zone Factor (z) - A Seismic Zone Factor of 0.40 is assigned based on I Table 16-I. Since the site is within Seismic Zone 4, Section 1629.4.2 requires a Seismic Source Type and Near Source Factor. I e. Near-Source Factor (Na and Nv) - Based on the known active faults in the region and distance of the faults from the site, a Seismic Source Type of B per Table 16- U, and Near Source Factors of Na = 1.0 per Table 16-S and Nv 1.2 per Table I 16-T are provided. f. Seismic Coefficients (Ca and Cv) - Using the Soil Profile Type and Seismic Zone 1 Factor along with Tables 16-Q and 16-R, the Seismic Coefficients Ca = 0.44 (Na) and Cv = 0.64 (Nv) are provided, or Ca = 0.44 and Cv = 0.77. 1 Slope Stability cut or fill slopes are planned for the proposed construction. I No Site Grading I Prior to construction, the portions of 'the site where improvements are proposed should 'be cleared of existing surface obstructions, vegetation and debris. Materials I generated during clearing should be disposed of at an approved location off-site. Holes resulting from the removal of buried obstructions which extend below finished site grades should be backfilled with compacted fill. Old septic systems, if I encountered, should be removed and backfihled in accordance with local regulations. Within the limits of the proposed improvements, the topsoil should be removed down to approved terrace deposits and replaced with compacted fill in order to achieve final I ' design grades. Removal depths are anticipated to extend approximately 1 to 2-feet below the existing site grades. Actual removal depths should be determined in the field by the Geotechnical Consultant based on conditions exposed during grading. I Following removals, the exposed terrace deposits should be scarified to a, depth of 6 to 8-inches, moisture conditioned to about optimum moisture content and compacted at least 90-percent relative compaction based upon ASTM: D 1557. The I to recommended removals and compaction should extend to at least 3-feet outside the limits of proposed improvements where possible. I. I HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. I PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 November 10, 2006 I Page 8 Fill should be compacted by mechanical means in uniform horizontal lifts of 6 to 8- inches in thickness. All fill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90-percent based upon ASTM: D 1557. The on-site materials are suitable for use as compacted fill provided all vegetation and debris are removed. Rock fragments I over 6-inches in maximum dimension and other perishable or unsuitable materials should be excluded from the fill. All grading and compaction should be observed and I tested as necessary by the Geotechnical Consultant. 5. Foundation and Slab Recommendations I The proposed building additions may be supported on new, conventional continuous/spread footings founded at least 18-inches into compacted fill or terrace deposits. Footings should be at least 15-inches wide, and reinforced with a minimum I of two #4 bars, one top and one bottom. Foundations located adjacent to utility trenches should extend to below a 1:1 plane projected upward from the bottom of the I trench. Foundations bearing as recommended may be designed for a dead plus live load bearing value of 2000-pounds-per-square-foot. This value may be increased by one- third for loads including wind and seismic forces. A lateral bearing value of 250- pounds-per-square-foot per foot of depth and a coefficient of friction between foundation soil and concrete of 0.35 may be assumed. These values assume that I footings will be poured neat against the foundation soils. Footing excavations should be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to the placement of reinforcing I steel in order to verify that they are founded in suitable bearing materials. If existing foundations are intended to support new structural loads, they should be I observed during construction by the Structural Engineer and Geotechnical Consultants and, if considered structurally adequate, be deepened into approved bearing materials as recommended for new footings. Minor post-construction distress I . along the interface between the existing residence and building additions may occur. Total and differential settlement due to new foundation loads are considered to be less than 1/2-inch and 1/4-inch, respectively, for footings founded as recommended. I Slab-on-grade floors should have a minimum thickness of 4-inches (actual) and should be reinforced with at least #3 bars spaced at 18-inches, center-to-center, in two I . directions and supported on chairs so that the reinforcement is at mid-height in the slab. Floor slabs should be underlain by a 4-inch thick layer of sand with a 10-mil visqueen vapor barrier placed in the middle of the sand layer. Prior to placing concrete, the slab subgrade soils should be thoroughly moistened. I HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 November 10, 2006 Page 9 Flatwork Concrete flatwork should be at least 4-inches thick and reinforced with at least No. 4 bars placed at 18-inches on center (two directions) and placed on chairs so that the reinforcement is in the center of the slab. The subgrade should be thoroughly moistened prior to placement of concrete. Contraction joints should be provided at 8 feet spacings (maximum). Sulfate Content Representative samples of the on-site soils were submitted for sulfate analyses. The results of the soluble sulfate tests per EPA 9038 method are presented on the attached Laboratory Tests Results, Figure 4. The sulfate content of the on-site soils is consistent with a negligible sulfate exposure classification per Table 19-A-4 of the 2001 California Building Code. Consequently, special provisions for sulfate resistant concrete are not considered necessary. Utility Trench Backfill I All utility trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90- percent relative compaction (ASTM: D 1557). Backfill should be tested and observed by the Geotechnical Consultant. 1 9. Site Drainage I The following recommendations are intended to minimize the potential adverse effects of water on the structures and appurtenances. I a. Consideration should be given to providing the structures with roof gutters and downspouts that discharge to an area drain system and/or to suitable locations I away from the structures. b. All site drainage should be directed away from the structures. On-site soils are generally sandy in nature and considered erodible if exposed to concentrated I drainage. I , c. No landscaping should be allowed against the structures. Moisture accumulation or watering adjacent to foundations can result in deterioration of wood/stucco and may affect foundation performance. I I ' HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 November 10, 2006 Page 10 Irrigated areas should not be over-watered. Irrigation should be limited to that required to maintain the vegetation. Additionally, automatic systems must be seasonally adjusted to minimize over-saturation potential particularly in the winter (rainy) season. All yard and roof drains should be periodically checked to verify they are not blocked and flow properly. This may be accomplished either visually or, in the case of subsurface drains, by placing a hose at the inlet and checking the outlet for flow. 10. Recommended Observation and Testing During Construction The following tests and/or observations by the Geotechnical Consultant are recommended: . Site grading. Footing excavations prior to placement of forms and reinforcing steel. Utility trench backfill. 11. Grading and Foundation Plan Review Grading and foundation plans should be reviewed by the Geotechnical Consultant to confirm conformance with the recommendations presented herein or to modify the recommendations as necessary. LIMITATIONS The analyses, coriclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they existed at the time of our investigation and further assume the excavations to be representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site. If different subsurface conditions from those encountered during our exploration are observed or appear to be present in excavations, the Geotechnical Consultant should be promptly notified for review and reconsideration of recommendations. Our investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable Geotechnical Consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, express or implied, is, made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 November 10, 2006 Page 11 This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions, please call this office. Sincerely, Hetherington Engineering, Inc. 0*SSIo son S. Geldert Dale Hamelehie Registered Civil er 6) Professional Geologist 5551 v-0 * Certified Engineering Geol ZO (expires 03/31/0 cr_ (expires 12/31/07) NO. 1ThU CERTIFIED 14 ENGINEERING J GEOLOGIST J I I I I I I I I I I DHIJG/dkw Attachments: Location Map Figure 1 Plot Plan Figure 2 Boring Logs Figures 3 Laboratory Test Results Figure 4 Distribution: Addressee —4 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. I I I I I I I I I I I I REFERENCES 1. Abbott, P., L., edited, "On the Manner of Deposition of the Eocene Strata in I Northern San Diego County," San Diego Association of Geologists, Guidebook dated April 13, 1985. 1 2. Aerial Photographs, Flight GS-VBTA, Photos 1-143 and 1-144, dated May 8, 1967. I 3. Cao, Tianqing, et a!, "The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps," dated June 2003. 1 4. ICBO, "California Building Code," 2001 Edition. ICBO, "Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent I Portions of Nevada," dated February 1998. Jennings, Charles W., "Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas, I California Division of Mines and Geology, Map No. 6," 1994. Kern, Philip and Rockwell, Thomas, K., "Chronology and Deformation of I Quaternary Marine Shorelines, San Diego . County, California," South Coast Geological Society, Inc., Annual Field Trip Guide Book No. 20, 1992. 1 8. Peterson, M., Beeby, W., Bryant, W., et al., "Seismic Shaking Hazard Maps of California, California Division of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 48," 1999. 1 9. "Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California", California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 96-08 and USGS Open-File Report I 96-706, 1996. Ram BD&E Inc., Architectural Plans, "Rice Residence," Sheets Al through A7, SD-1 I through SD-3 and T-24, dated September 1, 2006. Tan, Siang S. and Giffen, Desmond G., "Geologic Maps in the Northwestern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, California," California 1 Division of Mines and Geology, Open File Report 96-02, 1996. I 12. Tan, Siang S. and Giffen,. Desmond G., "Landslide Hazards in the Northern Part of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, San Diego County, California, Landslide Hazard Identification Map No. 35", California Division of Mines and Geology, I Open-File Report 95-04, 1995. 13. Treiman, Jerome A., "The Rose Canyon Fault Zone, Southern California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 93-02, 1993. I Project No. 5656.1 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. LogNo. 10411 REFERENCE 14. Weber, Harold F., Jr., "Recent Slope Failures, Ancient Landslides and Related Geology of the North-Central Coastal Area, San Diego County, California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 82-12L, 1982. Project No. 5656.1 Log No. 10411 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. iO&93 (PROPERTY EJ r NE) 47 -'- ---------------r------ ,4. - K - 4- * - K- K >K- K - 4- 4- -LIMITS OF PROPOSED TWO-STORY BUILDING ADDITION - 17 41 >T{42 HA 2 K- K- K- SCALE: 1 10 ILA K- / 0 1 2 z 0J/j c~ 474- - 4- I /// / 1 0 5 10 15 20 K- C) co o , / J HA-i/7-/////'// t - 0 o 4- 4- 7- - 4 I 0 // 7 / / // // ,// / / / l/ // 7 4 - Jj - 7 ,///,//5 // '/,/'// K- 17~P1 K- 4- K- 4- : [GJJT L//7>,>/zi,///// /////// 4- 4- K-'/////_ -<- LEGEND HA-2& APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF HAND AUGER BORING rn 4- DI Al 7_ rn r LIMITS OF PROPOSED DRIVEWAY 4-4-K-K- 2 rn On LIMITS, OF PROPOSED ONE-STORY GARAGE ADDITION Cli 4- -K- - > 0 oz 17 yi K- 7< K- K-'-p84- ;a 4 1 PLOT PLAN 1280 Yourell Avenue Carlsbad, California HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. - 108.93' (PROPERTY LINE' — / GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 5656.1 1 FIGURE NO. 2 EXPANSION INDEX (ASTM D 4829)' Sample jInitial Compa cted Final , Expansion Expansion Locatioh Moistuie Dry ' Moisture 7Iiidéi Poteitial Density 1 - ' ~RI 4 ',;• k (pci) ''•: • ' r - HA-1 @0-2' 7.1 117.1 11.7 0 Very Low DII]CT SI-lEAR (A.STII\1I D 3080) '.•'_*'; .4-.;. . Sainpie "'AnglëófInteriia1 ';Col i' 'Rernáik I - .;i Location, ;,'Friction HA-1@ 2.5' 29 200 Remolded to 90% @ optimum, saturated, consolidated, drained 9 - Figure 4 - Project No. 5656.1 Log No 10411 I I I I . I . I. I I . I I. I I I . I I. I I I LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SULFATE TEST RESULTS' ;W:, '. ' ! '. Sample Location 1i Soluble Sulfate in Soil (%) '- HA-i @0-2' . .00596 DRILLING COMPANY: RIG: Hand Auger DATE: 09/29/06 BORING DIAMETER: 6-inches DRIVE WEIGHT: DROP: p U) 0 cf) iii U)Z E-i Z C/) 00 SOIL DESCRIPTION a4 r) U) >'1—i 0 -- Es ) U) Es z fn rQ .' " E BORING NO. HA-1 ELEVATION: t —0.0 - SM TOPSOIL: Light brown silty fine to medium sand, dry to damp, - x 110 4 6 \ loose, some roots - TERRACE DEPOSIT: Orange brown fine to medium sand with — — some silt, moist, medium dense to dense, slight pinhole XI 119 porosity - 6.4 5.0 @ 4': Becomes red orange and dense -- - _____________________________________ - - . Total depth 5 feet - No groundwater - No caving - 10.0—. 15.0 --- BORING NO. HA-2 ELEVATION: -0.0 ---- SM TOPSOIL: Brown, fine to medium sand with some silt, damp, - - loose, some roots. — - - )K 112 5.6 - TERRACE DEPOSIT: Orange brown fine to medium sand with trace silt, moist, medium dense to dense, slight pinhole porosity 119 7.7 - 5.0— —x 114 8.3 Q5': Becomes red orange, dense - Total depth 7 feet - - No groundwater . . No caving — 10.0— - 15.0--- - BORING LOG 1280 Vourell Avenue HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Carlsbad, California PROJECT NO. 5656.1 FIGURE NO. 3 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS Ii I I I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I