Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1850 TULE CT; ; CB081283; Permit
City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 08-18-2008 Residential Permit Permit No: CB081283 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: 1850 TULE CT CBAD Permit Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Status: ISSUED Parcel No: 2155040100 Lot #: 0 Applied: 07/03/2008 Valuation: $178,310.00 Construction Type: 5B Entered By: JMA Occupancy Group: Reference #: Plan Approved: 08/18/2008 # Dwelling Units: 0 Structure Type: Issued: 08/18/2008 Bedrooms: 0 Bathrooms: 0 Inspect Area: Project Title: BAYKAL: 1420SF ADDITION: 590SF Orig PC#: 1ST FLR, 830SF 2ND FL! 338SF DECK Plan Check#: Applicant: JAMES CHINN 2120 JIMMY DURANTE #117 DEL MAR 92014 858-755-5863 Owner: BAYKAL KATHERINA 1852 TULE CT CARLSBAD CA 92011 Building Permit $861.69 Meter Size Add'I Building Permit Fee $0.00 Add'l Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Plan Check $560.10 Meter Fee $0.00 Add'I Plan Check Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 Plan Check Discount $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 Strong Motion Fee $17.83 PFF (3105540) $0.00 Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 PFF (4305540) $0.00 Park Fee $0.00 License Tax (3104193) $0.00 LFM Fee $0.00 License Tax (4304193) . $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (3105541) $0.00 Other Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee (4305541) $0.00 BTD #2 Fee $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 BTD #3 Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $104.00 Renewal Fee $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $35.00 Add'l Renewal Fee $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $82.50 Other Building Fee $0.00 Housing Impact Fee . $0.00 HMP Fee $0.00 Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Housing Credit Fee $0.00 Meter Size Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Add'l Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Additional Fees $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $1661.12 Total Fees: $1,661.12 Total Payments To Date: $1,661.12 Balance Due: $0.00 .9 FINAL APPROVAL Inspector: Date: - 5 ''? Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition' of fees, dedications, reservations, ur other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions.' You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any fees/exactions of which you have oreviouslv been given a NOTICE similar to this, or as to which the statute of limitations has previously otherwise expired. Cityof Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 760-602-2717 / 2718 / 2719 Fax: 760-602-8558 www.carlsbadca.gov Building Permit Application Plan Check No.C15 O 3 12 Est. Value Plan Ck. Deposit to , Date 7(3(0 r I Li W- JOB ADDRESS 7i ' SUITE#/SPACE#/UNIT# AP a - - - of CT/PROJECT # LOT# PHASE# 1#OFUNITS 1#BEDROOMS #BATHROOMS 1TENANTBUSINESSNAME CONSTR. TYPE I 'j 0CC. GROUP DESCRIPTION OFORK: Include Square Feet of Affected Area(s) I qar s. r /->Qo 17i4 (Sci 3. . dO2trf EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE I GARAGE (SF) PATIOS (SF) DECKS (SF) I FIREPLACE YES 0 #_ NOD I AIR CONDITIONING IFIRESPRINKLERS YES 0 NOD YES D NOD APPLICANT NAME ADDRESS 2-I 2c J 1101^!1 __________________________ CITYQe,( STATE q~U ç CITY STATE ZIP PHO( , PHONE FAX EMAIL Ji& EMAIL PROPER1Q , CONTRACTOR BUS. NAME ADDRESS /8c2._7L1C_Cfl ADDRESS _________________ CITY A-&s ZIP 'TZcI I CITY STATE ZIP PHON - FAX PHONE FAX EMAIL EMAIL ARCFJDNAE&AO7(.p STATE UC. , # çj•;, STATE UC.# I0 ICITY BUS.LIC.# pec. luul.s Bonbon and Protections Cede day City nr.0000ty which requires a permit to construct, .alter improve titmolish or iepair. any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such peflnht to file a signed statement that e is Ficeinedjiunuant to the provisions of the Contra or's License Law (Chapter 9, commendmg with Section Ices of Division 3 of the lumens and Pretensions Cede} or that he e exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than live hundred dollars ($5(10)). Workers' CompensatIon Declaration: Iherebyaffirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: 11 I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is Issued. Cl I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My workers' compensation insurance canter and policy number are: Insurance Co. Policy No. Expiration Date This section need not becompleted if the permit is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less. Cl Certificate of Exemption: I certify that In the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person In any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage Is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars (&100,000), In addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, Interest and attorney's fees. AT CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE DATE !h reby affirm that lam exempt from Contractor's Ucense Law for the following reason: 1, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not Intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sate. if, however, the building or improvement Is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sate). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of properly who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: 1.1 personally plan toprovide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement DYes 0 No 2.1 (have! have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. 3.1 have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name address I phone !contractors' license number): 4. I plan to provide portions of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name! address! phone! contractors' license number): 5.1 will provide some of the work, but I have contracted (hired) the following persons to provide the work indicated (include name I address I phone! type of work): PROPERTY OWNER SIGNATURE 0 o 1_.s_"_... DATE c Af -/C Jk € )PQv&1?( U6 (O( (®( O®&(J1OL O(!)O(?c®OQ)ø &IG!}O?Ø G!)(L17 Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505.25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYes 0 No Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYes 0 No Is the facility lobe constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYes 0 No IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. &fJ®O(J s7 I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work this permit is issued (Sec. 3097 (i) Civil Code). Lender's Name Lender's Address O@7 QUiO 0®J IcerdlythatIhave read the application and statethatihe above Infotonation Isconioctand thatthe information on the plans is accurate. Iagreeto complywith all City ordinances and State laws ielatingto buildlngconsljvctlon. I hereby authorize representative of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned prop" for Inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANYWAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over5'O' d demolition or construction of structures over3stories in height. EXPIRATION:EverypennitissuedbytheBuildu'ig d l8o days fmm the date ofsuth tithe or ed bysuth permitissuspended or abandoned at any time after the work iscommenced for aperiod of 180 days (Section 1064.4 Uniform Building Code). .'APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE 07 ,/'3 1/r Inspection List Permit#: CB081283 Type: RESDNTL RAD BAYKAL: 1420SF ADDITION: 590SF 1ST FLR, 830SF 2ND FL! 338SF DECK Date Inspection Item Inspector Act Comments 05/05/2009 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin RB WC 05/05/2009 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin - RI DID NOT SAY WHAT WAS NEEDED 05/05/2009 89 Final Combo RB AP PER'JM LIST 04/21/2009 89 Final Combo - RI A M PLEASE 04/21/2009 89 Final Combo JM CO LIST ON SITE 01/06/2009 17 Interior Lath/Drywall JM AP @ ENTRY TURRIT 01/02/2009 34 Rough Electric JM AP © ENTRY TOWER 12/24/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin JM AP AT ENTRY ONLY 12/24/2008 18 Exterior LathfDrywall JM AP 12/24/200823 Gas/Test/Repairs JM AP 12/22/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin MC PA SEE CARD FOR COMMENTS © ENTRY 12/22/2008 17 Interior Lath/Drywall MC AP 12/22/2008 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall MC CO 12/22/2008 23 Gas/Test/Repairs MC CO TEST FAILED 12/15/2008 16 Insulation JM AP 12/12/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Weldin PY NR ENTRY 12/09/2008 84 Rough Combo RB PA OK PER LIST EXCEPT ENTRY AREA 12/08/2008 84 Rough Combo JM CO LIST ON SITE 11/18/2008 24 Rough/Topout JM PA WASTE © GARAGE SHEAR WALL 11/14/2008 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers JM AP ENTRY 11/14/200813 Shear Panels/HD's JM AP 11/07/2008 15 Roof/Reroof JM AP 10/24/2008 13 Shear Panels/HD's JM CO 10/24/2008 15 Roof/Reroof JM CO plan changes require city approval 10/21/2008 13 Shear Panels/HO's JM CO 10/21/2008 15 Roof/Réroof JM CO PLAN CHANGES REQUIRE CITY APPROVAL 08/21/2008 11 FtgiFoundation/Piers JM AP 08/19/2008 21 Underground/Under Floor JM AP 08/19/2008 22 Sewer/Water Service JM AP Tuesday, May 05, 2009 A Page 1 of 1 City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 05/05/2009 Permit# CB081283 Title: BAYKAL: 1420SF ADDITION: 590SF Description: 1ST FLR, 830SF 2ND FL! 338SF DECK Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: 1850 TULE CT Suite: Lot: 0 Location: APPLICANT JAMES CHINN Owner: BAYKAL KATHERINA Remarks: DID NOT SAY WHAT WAS NEEDED Total Time: Inspector Assignment: JM Phone: Inspector: Requested By: NA Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comments 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding frf' f- 7frt /;1- Comments/Notices/Holds Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# Inspection History Date Description Act lnsp 04/21/2009 89 Final Combo CO JM 01/06/2009 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP JM 01/02/2009 34 Rough Electric AP JM 12/24/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding AP JM 12/24/2008 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP JM 12/24/2008 23 Gas/Test/Repairs AP JM 12/22/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA MC 12/22/2008 17 Interior Lath/Drywall AP MC 12/22/2008 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall CO MC 12/22/2008 23 Gas/Test/Repairs CO MC 12/15/2008 16 Insulation AP JM 12/12/2008 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding NR PY 12/09/2008 84 Rough Combo PA RB 12/08/2008 84 Rough Combo CO JM 11/18/2008 24 Rough/Topout PA JM 11/14/2008 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP JM 11/14/2008 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP JM 11/07/2008 15 Roof/Reroof AP JM 10/24/2008 13 Shear Panels/HD's CO JM Comments LIST ON SITE @ ENTRY TURRIT @ ENTRY TOWER AT ENTRY ONLY SEE CARD FOR COMMENTS @ ENTRY TEST FAILED ENTRY OK PER LIST EXCEPT ENTRY AREA LIST ON SITE WASTE @ GARAGE SHEAR WALL ENTRY VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT Project Name: YXX\j 'Cc ', 1. Project Ad 1'U T1k. (1..k (oco.ck / (1h Permit Number: Architect: .e AA I Engineer: File Number: General Contractor: h €5C1.Q.Ak6 Job Number: Contractor Doing Reported Work: F11.- p Other: Lab. Receiving & Testing Constr. Mat'l Samples: N/A Other: INSPECTION - MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MAT'L DESCRIPTION - INSPECTION CHECK LIST - Field Shop - Concrete Cylinders Reinforcing Steel Plan/Specs - Concrete - Mortar Samples - Cone. Mix/PSI - Clearances Structural Steel - Grout Samples - Cone. Mix/PSI Positions - Masonry - Masonry Prisms - All Thread Bolts - Sizes - Fireproofing - Masonry Block - Grout Mix/PSI - Laps - Pile Driving - Reinforcing Steel - Mortar Type/PSI - Consolidation - Roofing - Fireproofing H.S. Bolts - Torque Applied - Specialty - Asphalt Concrete - Electrode Tension Applied - Soils Technician - Roofing - Steel Epoxy - Bolt Pull-Out - Steel - Fireproof - Drilled Holes - Prestress Concrete - High Strength Bolts - Units Block - Corrective Action - Waterproofing - Other - Unit Brick - OSHPD Other Metal Deck - OSA Other - Reinf. Tendons Corrections Complete - Mechanical - Other - Electrical - Other - Other Batch Plant - - - Other Other Inspection Date: ere-J. 4-4e.- ey cj- - ; +o +r OC1 ' i L4 i, EY22.. €o(( &5 s DCttkc lo1,05 Were- clecwx bere.- sei-4-ioii . C4 rl( c— Cc4ck CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report only covers the locations of the work inspected and does not constitute engineering opinion or project control. INSPECTOR NAME: korov\. CERTIFICATE NUMBER: ') 140 10 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATURE/') NOTE: Inspections based on a 4-hour minimum; actual time after 4 hours; 2 hour show up m urn for job cancellations. Overtime effective on Saturdays, double time on Sunday '-k c-3 SUBMITTED TO: çcu€ #44€_; OL%(d. t0 '100 0'-W\ TESTING SERVICES & INSPECTION INC. 3030 Main Street 'A Quality Assurance Firm" San Diego, CA 92113 (619) 234-9904 (619) 234-4931 Fax !i1[I1i%J Project Name: BAYKAL RESIDENCE Project Address: 1850 TULE COURT, CARLSBAD CA Permit Number: CB081283 Architect: JAMES A. CHIN Engineer: N/A File Number: N/A General Contractor: OWNER BUILDER Job Number: N/A Contractor Doing Reported Work: OWNER BUILDER Other: N/A Lab. Receiving & Testing Constr. Mat'l Samples: N/A Other: COUNTY INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MAT'L DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECK LIST T Field Concrete Cylinders 41 Reinforcing Steel A615Gr60 T Plan/Specs SHEETS/I5-16/D:1 - Concrete - Mortar Samples - Conc. Mix/PSI T Clearances - Structural Steel Grout Samples Conc. Mix/PSI T Positions - Masonry - Masonry Prisms All Thread Bolts 5/8" T Sizes - Fireproofing - Masonry Block - Grout Mix/PSI - Laps - Pile Driving - Reinforcing Steel - Mortar Type/PSI - Consolidation - Roofing - Fireproofing - H.S. Bolts - Torque Applied - Specialty - Asphalt Concrete - Electrode Tension Applied Soils Technician - Roofing - Steel Epoxy SIMPSON ICC 1772 V Epoxy Bolt & DOWELS Steel Fireproof T Drilled Holes PER PLAN - Prestress Concrete - High Strength Bolts - Units Block - Corrective Action - Waterproofing - Other - Unit Brick - - OSHPD - Other - Metal Deck - - OSA - Other - Reinf. Tendons - Corrections Complete - Mechanical - Other - Epoxy - - Electrical - Other Other - Batch Plant Other - - - Other - Inspection Date: 11-12-08 EPDXY BOLT AND DOWEL INSTALLATION. VERIFIED HOLE SIZE AND DEPTH. OBSERVED HOLE CLEAN OUT WITH COMPRESSED AIR AND BRUSH. MONITORED EPDXY BOLT AND DOWEL INSTALLATION PROCEDURES IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: 7- #4 REINFORCING STEEL DOWELS AT FRONT STEP. PER DETAILS 15 & 16/D.1 3-5/8" ALL THREAD BOLTS FOR HOLD DOWNS AT GARAGE WALL AND BACK BED ROOM WALL INTO EXISTING FOOTING PER DETAIL 2 ON SHEET 8 EPDXY- SIMPSON STRONG TIE SET 22. ICC 1772. EXPIRES 07-31-10 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report only covers the locations of the work inspected and does not constitute engineering opinion or project control. INSPECTOR NAME: STANLEY L SCHLAGER CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 455 INS 'S SIGNATURE NOTE: Inspections based on a 4-hour minimum; actual time after 4 hours; 2 hour show up minimum or job cancellation/dvertime effective on Saturdays, double time on Sunday SUBMITTED TO: CITY OF CAKLSbAU/ 0WNK UIL1)tIV LU.U. TESTING SERVICES & INSPECTION INC. 3030 Main Street 'A Quality Assurance Finn" San Diego, CA 92113 (619) 234-9904 (619) 234-4931 Fax VISUAL INSPECTION REPORT Project Name: BAYKAL ADDITION Project Address: 1850 TULE COURT, CARLSBAD CA Permit Number: C8081283 Architect: JAMES A. CHIN I Engineer: N/A File Number: N/A General Contractor: BAYKAL RESIDENTS Job Number: N/A Contractur Doing Reported Work: EMPIRE PRECAST Other: N/A Lab. Receiving & Testing Constr. Mat'[ Samples: N/A Other: COUNTY INSPECTION MAT'L SAMPLING QTY MAT'L DESCRIPTION INSPECTION CHECK LIST T Field Concrete Cylinders rl Reinforcing Steel #3 Plan/Specs - Concrete - Mortar Samples - Cone. Mix/PSI - Clearances Structural Steel - Grout Samples - Cone. Mix/PSI - Positions - Masonry - Masonry Prisms - All Thread Bolts - Sizes - Fireproofing - Masonry Block - Grout Mix/PSI - Laps - Pile Driving - Reinforcing Steel - Mortar Type/PSI - Consolidation - Roofing - Fireproofing - H.S. Bolts - Torque Applied - Specialty - Asphalt Concrete - Electrode - Tension Applied - Soils Technician - Roofing - Steel I Epoxy - Epoxy Bolt - Steel - Fireproof - Drilled Holes - Prestress Concrete - High Strength Bolts - Units Block - Corrective Action - Waterproofing - Other - Unit Brick - — OSHPD - Other - Metal Deck - OSA - Other - Reinf. Tendons - Corrections Complete Mechanical - Other :m Epoxy ET-22 - Electrical - Other - Other - Batch Plant —I - - Other Other Inspection Date: 08-19-08 VERIFIED THE EPDXY OF 22 #3 BARS AT 32" LENGTH DOWELED 4" INTO EXISTING FOOTING EVERY 36" O.C., DETAIL 15 SHEET D-I. El 22 EPDXY WAS USED. DRILLED HOLES WERE CLEANED BEFORE INSERTION. CONTRACTOR PERFORMED WORK ACCORDING TO CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE: All of the reported work, unless otherwise noted, complies with approved plans, specifications and applicable sections of the building codes. This report only covers the locations of the work inspected and does not constitute engineering opinion or project control. INSPECTOR NAME: AARON ROURKE CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 8014010-84 INSPECTOR'S SIGNATUFn - NOTE: Inspections based on a 4-hour minimum; actual time after 4 hours; 2 hour show up minimum for job cancellations. Overtime effective on Saturdays, double time on Sunday SUBMITTED TO: COUNTY OF CARLSBAD / C.O.D. City of Carlsbad Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: 760-602-7541/ Fax: 760-602-8558 sboro@cl.carlsbad.ca.us Plan Chech Comments,, 2007 Codes To: From:. Steve Borossay PE Fax: cg I8 Pages: Phone: Date: p Re: g Address: (2:ç — D Urgent Ej For Review Please Reply Please make corrections on the originals and run TWO new prints. Red marks on plans are part of this comment list. Please return red marked set also. c- I' 7ru-C.9 r 2 c v-c& 40 (l 1tAJ S. C'1- 3% ea-c VLfQc ; Q LA C- 4~ r(Z4"'~ -S" I9DI I. c-k t'p P CCA-L 4:Z QV-- I From: Steve Borossay PE &ck • City of Carlsbad I Building Department 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: 760-602-7541/ Fax: 760-602-8558 sboro@cl.carlsbad.ca.us Plan Check Comments Phone: Date: i - lit ic.. , Re: 73¼5 , ( - Address:-TU 1 0 Urgent . For Review Please Reply Please make corrections on the originals and run TWO new prints. Red marks on plans are part of this comment list. Please return red marked set also. V rn (i cC) LTF . c (O Lc c L TT o rex p1 f ci LRk&AP 9 cck rUSCS Ac C_(n ' * Joists to Plate Studs to Plate with A Leg Inside with B Leg Outside Joists to Beams Ceiling Joists to Beam A35 WIZONS 1111121111111 III LTP4 Installed over 5 Plywood Sheathing LTP4 attachir Top Plates to Rim Joist Chimney Framing r 10r, P "' - -t - - - __________ The larger LTP5 spans subfloor at the top of the blocking or rim joist. The embossments enhance performance and the mm/max nailing option allows for design flexibility. The LTP4 Lateral Tie Plate transfers shear forces for top plate-to-rim joist or blocking connections. Nail holes are spaced to prevent wood splitting for single and double top plate applications. May be installed over plywood sheathing. The A35 anchor's exclusive bending slot allows instant, accurate field bends for all two- and three-way ties. Balanced, completely reversible design permits the A35 to secure a great variety of connections. MATERIAL: LTP4/LTP5-20 gauge; all others-18 gauge FINISH: Galvanized. Some products available in stainless steel or ZMAX; see Corrosion Information, page 10-11. INSTALLATION: • Use all specified fasteners. See General Notes. A34—Use 8-8dxl ½' nails. A35—Use 12-8dx1½' nails. A35—Use 9-8dx11/a nails for connection types Al, E, Ci. A35—Bend one time only. LTP4—Use 12-8dx1W nails. LTP5-:-Use 12-8dx1W nails; G Max use 14-8dx1½' nails. CODES: See page 12 for Code Reference Key Chart. LTPI G 1f— , lI LLjLL LTP4 co A35 LTP5 These products are available with additional corrosion protection. Additional products on this page may also be available with this option, check with Simpson for details. Model No. Type of Connection Direction of Load DF/SP Allowable Loads SPF/HF Allowable Loads Code Ref. Floor (100) Roof (5) (133/160) Floor (100) Roof (5) (133/160) 434 - ID Ft 345 365 365 295 315 315 280 280 280 240 240 240 A,E 260 320 335 225 275 290 Ci 170 170 1 170 145 1 145 1 145 A35 1 A2 260 320 345 225 275 1 290 88,121, 140 C2 260 315 . 315 225 270 270 D 150 150 , 150 130 130 130 Fi 450 450 450 450 450 450 F26 515 '6W 685 370 370 600 LTP4 ID 6 515 645 670 445 555 595 6,30, 97,121 H 515 645 670 445 555 595 LTP5 1 G 520 595 595 445 510 510 160 GMax 610 630 630 525 540 540 H 520 555 555 445 475 475 A35 A35 Allowable loads are for one anchor. When anchors are installed on each side of the joist, the minimum joist thickness is T. Roof loads are 125% of floor loads unless limited by other criteria. Some illustrations show connections that could cause cross-grain tension or bending of the wood during loading if not reinforced sufficiently. In this case, mechanical reinforcement should be considered. LT134 can be installed over % structural sheathing with 8dx1W nails and achieve 0.72 of the listed load, or over ½ and achieve 0.64 of the listed load. 8d commons will achieve 100% load. The LTP5 may be installed over structural sheathing up to ½' thick using 8dx1½' nails with no reduction in load. Connectors are required on both sides to achieve F2 loads iLbotljrectiofls. NAILS: 8dx1½ = 0.131' dia. 'TWTSee page 16-17 for other nail sizes and Information. 6X6X3/8TS column. EsGil Corporation In Partnersfiip with government for (Building Safety DATE: 08/14/2008 CANT JURIS.. JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad U PLA REVIEWER 0 FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1283 SET: III PROJECT ADDRESS: 1850 Tule Court PROJECT NAME: Baykal Addition The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. LI The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. LII The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. LI The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. LI Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. LII REMARKS: By: Aaron Goodman Enclosures: Esgil Corporation D GA 0 MB 0 EJ D PC 07/31/2008 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation In Partnership with government for (Building Safety DATE: 08/06/2008 U NT JURIS. JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1283 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 1850 Tule Court PROJECT NAME: Baykal Addition LI The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. El The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LII The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: James Chinn 2120 Jimmy Durante Blvd. #117 Del Mar, CA 92014 LI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contactep Ja s Chinn Date contacted: /)yiz Mail/'Telephone Fax. In Person LI REMARKS: By: Aaron Goodman Esgil Corporation DGA [1 MB DEJ LJPc Telephone #: 858-755-5863 Fax #: 858-755-8186 Enclosures: 07/31/2008 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 City of Carlsbad 08-1283 08/06/2008 RECHECK CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1283 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1850 Tule Court SET: II DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: ESGIL CORPORATION: 07/31/2008 08/06/2008 REVIEWED BY: Aaron Goodman FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to. the technical requirements contained in the Building Code, Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Electrical Code and. state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laWs and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. The approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit 2 new complete sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheetwith the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did hot keep a copy of the prior correction . list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes DNo City of Carlsbad 08-1283 08/06/2008 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. PLANS 08/06/2008: Please provide a complete set of revised structural calculations sealed and signed by the engineer of record. The first sheet of the structural calculations must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). END OF REVIEW To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. - Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes No U The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Aaron Goodman at Esgil Corporation. Thank you EsGil Corporation In .1'artnersliip with çovernment for (Bui1fing Safety DATE: 07/14/2008 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1283 SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS: 1850 Tule Court PROJECT NAME: Baykal Addition U PLAN REVIEWER U FILE The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: James Chinn 2120 Jimmy Durante Blvd. #117 Del Mar, CA 92014 Lii Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. - Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: James Chinn. Date contacted:7/1 'i' '(by? Mai/Telephone Fay" In Person LI REMARKS: By: Aaron Goodman Esgil Corporation DGA [:1 MB DEJ F1 PC Telephone #: 858-755-5863 Fax #: 858-755-8186 Enclosures: 07/08/2008 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 City of Carlsbad 08-1283 07/14/2008 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1283 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1850 'rule Court FLOOR AREA: Existing Dwelling: 1,470 Existing Garage: 488 Proposed Dwelling addition: 1,420 Proposed Deck addition: 338 REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 07/14/2008 JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad STORIES: 2 HEIGHT: 27'- DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 07/08/2008 PLAN REVIEWER: Aaron Goodman FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the International Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenUation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that construction comply with the 2007 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 2006 IBC, 2006 UPC, 2006 UMC and 2005 NEC. The above regulations apply, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 105.4 of the 2006 International Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process, please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. City of Carlsbad 08-1283 07/14/2008 Please make all corrections, as requested in the correction list. Submit two sets of plans for residential projects. For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. . PLANS The first sheet of the structural calculations must be signed by the person responsible for their preparation. (California Business and Professions Code). Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans, stating that this project shall comply with the 2005 NEC. NOTE on the plans: Where more than one smoke alarm is required to be installed within a unit, the smoke alarms shall be interconnected in such a manner that the activation of one alarm will activate all of the alarms in the unit. Section 907.2.10.3. Where an addition, alteration or repair to an individual dwelling unit or guestroom in Group R requires a permit, battery-operated smoke alarms shall be installed in the existing construction in accordance with the preceding item. Section -907-2-.10.5.2. - Glazing in the following locations should be of safety glazing material in accordance with Section 2406.3 (see exceptions): Fixed and sliding panels of sliding door assemblies and panels in swinging doors other than wardrobe doors. Doors and enclosures for hot tubs, whirlpools, saunas, steam rooms, bathtubs and showers and in any portion of a building wall enclosing these compartments where the bottom exposed edge of the glazing is less than 60 inches above a standing surface. Walls enclosing stairway landings or within 5 feet of the bottom and top of stairways where the bottom edge of the glass is less than 60 inches above a walking surface. City of Carlsbad 08-1283 07/14/2008 EXITS, STAIRWAYS, AND RAILINGS 6. Provide stairway and landing details. Section 1009. Maximum rise is 7-3/4" and minimum run is A nosing not less than .75 inch but not more than 1.25 inches shall be provided on stairways with solid risers where the tread depth is less than 11 inches. Solid risers are required, or risers shall be sufficiently solid to prevent the passage of a 4" sphere. Section 1009.3.3. Minimum width is 36". The greatest riser height within any flight of stairs shall not exceed the' smallest by more than 3/8 inch. The greatest tread depth within any flight of stairs shall not exceed the smallest by more than 3/8 inch. 7. Handrails (CBC Section 1009.10): Shall be provided on at least one side of each stairway. Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. See Section 1012.3 for alternatives. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. . FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 8. Provide a foundation design supported by structural calculations. 9 A foundation/sons investigation is required for all projects in 'Seismic, Design -Categor!esC, D:E or F. Section 1802.2. Provide a copy of the project soil report. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings. In Seismic Design Categories D,Eor'F, the soils investigation must address liquefaction, and, if retaining walls are proposed, the soils investigation must address increased loading on the walls due to earthquake motions. Section 1802.2.7. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). City of Carlsbad 08-1283 07/1412008 13. Specify on the foUndation plan or structural specifications sheet the soil classification, the soils expansion index and the design bearing capacity of the foundation. Section A106.1.1. 14. If the soils engineer recommends that he/she review the foundation excavations, note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 15. Show distance from foundation to edge of cut or fill slopes ("distance-to- daylight") and show slope and heights of cuts and fills. Figure 1805.3.1. 16. Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern. The grade shall fall a minimum of 5% within the first 10 feet (2% for impervious surfaces). Section 1803.3. 17. Sill plate size and anchorage. ri Anchor bolts shall _be provided with square washers in accordance with Section 2305.3.11. Show the 3" square 0.229:' plate on the plans Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others (i.e., a "review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). Section A106.3.4.1. Please coordinate the architectural second floor plan and elevation(s) with the Upper Roof Framing Plan. The openings do not agree. Section A106.1.1. Spël inspection for seismic resistance shall be noted on the plans for the following conditions in accordance with Section 1707. Seismic Design Category Special inspection required C, 0, E, and F • Structural Nood*, structural welding, and cold form steel framing in "seismic-force-resisting systems"" * Special inspection is not required for wood where the fastener spacing of the sheathing is more than 4" on center. ** The part of the structural system that has been considered in the design to provide the required resistance to the prescribed seismic forces. (Section 1613.1) City of Carlsbad 08-1283 07/14/2008 A Statement of Special Inspections, prepared by the registered design professional in responsible charge, shall be submitted. This statement shall include a complete list of materials and work requiring special inspection, the inspections to be performed and an indication whether the special inspection will be-continuous or periodic. Section 1705.2. . MECHANICAL Show the minimum 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of the attic installed furnace. Section CMC Section 904.11.4. Note that passageway to the mechanical equipment in the attic shall be unobstructed, have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, and be not more than 20 feet in length from the access opening to the appliance. CMC Section 904.11. Show a permanent electrical receptacle outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch located at the entrance for furnaces located in an attic. CMC Section 904.11.5. . ELECTRICAL Provide a symbol definition key on the plans. Show on the plan the amperage of the electrical service, the location of the service panel and the location of any sub-panels. If the service is over 200 amperes, submit a single line diagram, panel schedules, and provide service load calculations. . ENERGY CONSERVATION PjoAie plans, calculations or worksheets to show compliance with current energy standards. Show on the plans compliance with the residential energy lighting requirements (Mandatory requirement): a) In the kitchen at least one-half of the wattage rating of the fixtures must be high efficacy with non-high efficacy fixtures switched separately. Note: Approximately % of the fixtures will be required to be of the high efficacy variety. (Continued on the next sheet) City of Carlsbad 08-1283 07/14/2008 In bathrooms, garages, laundry rooms, and utility rooms all fixtures must be high efficacy style or be controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor. All other rooms require any installed fixtures to be high efficacy or be controlled by a manually-on occupancy sensor or dimmer. (Closets under 70 square feet are exempt). Provide a symbol key. Outdoor lighting fixtures are required to be high efficacy or controlled by a combination photocontrol/motion sensor. Note: Generally a high efficacy style of fixture is fluorescent complete with electronic ballasts. Regular incandescent, quartz halogen and halogen MR lamps do not comply. Provide a window schedule. The replacement windows in an alternation must meet the U-factor and Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) of Package "D". (Prescriptive requirement) The window schedule shall clearly describe the required U-factor and solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) values and demonstrate compliance with the Title 24 energy calculations. END OF REVIEW To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes El NoU The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite-208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468. to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Aaron Goodman at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. City of Carlsbad 08-1283 0/14/2008 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: City of Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 08-1283 PREPARED BY: Aaron Goodman DATE: 07/14/2008 BUILDING ADDRESS: 1850 Tule Court BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3 / U TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Multiplier Reg. Mod. VALUE ($) Addition Per City 178,310 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers TOTAL VALUE 178,310 Jurisdiction Code Icb IBY Ordinance I Bldg. Permit Fee by Ordinance v I $861.691 Plan Check Fee by Ordinance v I $560.10I Type of Review: LJ Complete Review Structural Only - D Repetitive Fee- - Repeats El Other Hourly Hour * Esgil Plan Review Fee I $482.551 Comments: Sheet I of 1 macvalue.doc Carlsbad City of________ S I NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIAL INSPECTION Do Not Remove From Plans Plan Check No. C0 e i 7_8 3 Job Address or Legal Description t TU'4 (.T Owner Address You are hereby notified that in addition to the inspection of construction provided by the Building Department, an approved Registered Special Inspector is required to provide continuous inspection during the performance of the phases of construction indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. The Registered Special Inspector shall be approved by the City of Carlsbad Building Department prior to the i ssuance o f the building p ermit. S pecial Inspectors having a current certification from the City o f S an Diego, Los Angeles, or ICBO are approved as Special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The inspections by a Special Inspector do not change the requirements for inspections by personnel of the City of Carlsbad building department. The inspections by a special Inspector are in addition to the inspections normally required by the County Building Code. The Special Inspector is not authorized to inspect and approve any work other than that for which he/she is specifically assigned to inspect. The Special Inspector is not authorized to accept alternate materials, structural changes, or any requests for plan changes. The Special Inspector is required to submit written reports to the City of Carlsbad building department of all work that he/she inspected and approved. The final inspection approval will not be given until all Special Inspection reports have been received and approved by the City of Carlsbad building department. Please submit the names of the inspectors who will perform the special inspections on each of the items indicated on the reverse side of this sheet. (over) i:\word\forms\building\notice of requirement for special inspection.doc 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 • FAX (760) 602-8560 Building Counter • (760) 602-2719 • FAX (760) 602-8558 - m . SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM ADDRESS OR LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TL C. Ct9'0812...S3 PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME: Btt iL I, as t1owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the architect/engineer of record, will be• responsible for employing the special inspector(s) as required by the Uniform Building Code (UBC) Section 1701.1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Section 106.3.5. Signed I, as the architect/engineer of record, certify that I have prepared the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project located at the site listed above. Architect's/Engineer's Seal and Signature required: A. 7- Signed(:)2441#~ *ItNO. C-15737j 1. Vist of work requiring special inspection: Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection 0 Field Welding Structural Concrete over 2500 PSI 0 High Strength Bolting Prestressed Concrete Expansion/Epoxy Anchors Structural Masonry 0 Sprayed-On Fireproofing Designer Specified 0 Other 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special inspection listed above: (,C4jJ$49gc4 1 (5V'5 #0LeQ4" ' 3. Duties of the special inspectors for the work listed above:• pLCAJCL ( I Cc. —ç7't ( Special Inspectors shall check in with the City and present their credentials for approval prior to beginning work on the job site. I i4 IF City of Carlsbad S . ITI .11 f Works I i d i BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST DATE: 7/7/ PLANCHECKNO.: C131 0 l,2 S BUILDING AbDESS: /850 7D (a C-f PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: c5 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT EST. VALUE: APPROVAL The item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval is based on plans, information and/or specifications provided in your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in suspension of permit to build. O A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: DENIAL Please se th attached report of deficiencies marked with . Make necessary corrections to plans or specif ti s for compliance with applicable codes and stan ards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office forreview. By: Date: FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY By: AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT Date: U Dedication Application 0 Dedication Checklist El Improvement Application 0 Improvement Checklist 0 Neighborhood Improvement Agreement o Grading Permit Application O Grading Submittal Checklist 0 Right-of-Way Permit Application ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Name: JOANNE JUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: O Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist Carlsbad Tract: and Information Sheet 0 Storm water Applicability Checklist N etP •-Th 'C- 1T?ct*1 a w j4 ' t 11 . Carlsbad, CA 920O-7314 • (760) 602-2720 • FAX (760) 60252 -55.0 r1)cr 724'f t'9 5 - BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST SITE PLAN 3RD 0 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: A. North Arrow F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets B. Existing & Proposed Structures G. Driveway widths C. Existing Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral D. Property Lines I. Existing or proposed water service E. Easements . J. Existing or proposed irrigation service 2. Show on site plan: A. Drainage Patterns. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of One percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade will provide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." ~'-Size, Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography ' SuM) aJ type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and.water service (s)c3' that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, secondRZ 4& dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards. I) 0 3. Include on title sheet: L1_cL. Site address . . . . fix" Assessor's Parcel Number . . . Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER . DESCRIPTION F:WUILDINO PI.ANCHECK CKLST FORM.doc Rev. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 0 0 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No._______________________________________________________ 0 0 0 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 0 0 5 Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $ 17.000 , pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication. required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 W x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 0 0 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ 82.000 pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the F:8UILDING PLANCHECI( CKLST FORM.doc 3 Rev. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: 0 0 El 6b. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $430 so we may prepare the necessary Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building permit. Future public improvements required as follows: 0 El 0 6c. Enclosed please find your Neighborhood Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Neighborhood Improvement Agreement completed by: ,7 Date: El El 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective / improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction / of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 15.16.010 of the Municipal Code. 0 0 El 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Include accurate grading quantities in cubic yards (cut, fill, import, export and remedial). This information must be included on the plans. 0 0 0 lb. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading 'Inspector sign off by: Date: El 0 El 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) F:IBUILDING PLANCHECIC CKLST FORM 4OC 4 Rev. .6 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3R0 0 0 0 7d .No Grading Permit required. 0 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS !dY 0 0 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or I private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: Street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: 0 0 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7138, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: 0 0 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant• shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to / discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by / the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 0 0 • 10.a.STORM WATER COMPLIANCEFORM I 3equires PSWP (project storm water permit): # 't ?O 8 / • / 1Tier I/Tier II (Requires SWPPP) - Please complete attached forms L Exempt - Please complete attached exemption form O 0 ii. FEES I e(uired fees are attached No fees required FBUILOING PLANcHEcK CKLST FORM.doc Rev. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST WATER METER REVIEW ND 3R0 AI1'( 0 0 12a. Domestic (potable) Use Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service with a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 12 0 12b. Irrigation Use (whee recycled water is not available) lv All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets. If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection F:BUfl.DING PLANCHECK CKLST FORM.dcc 6 Rev. 7114100 1ST 2N0 3RD BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long, as the project is located within the City recycled water service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. G El 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled wateris available) Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWAfor'this. 0 0 El 13. Additional Comments: F:8UILOINO P.ANCHECK CKLST FORMA= Rev. 7114100 CITY OF CARLSBAD STANDARD FORM - TIER 1 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN STORM WATER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES My project is not in a category of permit types exempt from the Construction SWPPP requirements My project is not located inside or within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area with a significant potential for contributing pollutants to nearby receiving waters by way of storm water runoff or non-storm water discharge(s). My project does not requires a grading plan pursuant to the Carlsbad Grading Ordinance (Chapter 15.16 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code) My project will not result in 2.500 square feet or more of soils disturbance Including any associated construction staging, stockpiling, pavement removal, equipment storage, refueling and maintenance areas that meets one or more of the additional following criteria: located,within 200 feet of an environmentally sensitive area or the Pacific Ocean; and/or. disturbed area is located on a slope with a grade at or exceeding 5 horizontal to I vertical; and/or disturbed area is located along or within 30 feet of a storm drain inlet, an open drainage channel or watercourse; and/or construction will be initiated during the rainy season or will extend into the rainy season (Oct. 1 through April 30). I CERTIFY TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THAT ALL OF THE ABOVE CHECKED STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT. I AM SUBMITTING FOR CITY APPROVAL A TIER I CONSTRUCTION SWPPP PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CITY STANDARDS. I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I MUST: (1) IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE TO MINIMIZE, THE MOBILIZATION OF POLLUTANTS SUCH AS SEDIMENT AND TO MINIMIZE THE EXPOSURE OF STORM WATER TO CONSTRUCTION RELATED POLLUTANTS; AND, (2) ADHERE TO, AND AT ALL TIMES, COMPLY WITH THIS CITY APPROVED TIER I CONSTRUCTION SWPPP THROUGHTOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND APPROVED BY THE CI :~;, =7 TY OF CARLSB 71MRN'18 A (PRDM OWNER(S)/OWNER'S AGT NAME (SIGNATURE) DATE ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE TO FACILITATE RAPID INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BUTS WHEN RAIN IS EMINENT. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO WORKING ORDER TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AFTER EACH RUN- OFF PRODUCING RAINFALL. THE OWNER/CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING OR BUILDING INSPECTOR DUE TO UNCOMPLETED GRADING OPERATIONS OR UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY ARISE. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHALL BE IN. PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE FIVE (5) DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS FORTY PERCENT (40%). SILT AND OTHER DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAINFALL. ALL GRAVEL BAGS SHALL BE BURLAP TYPE WITH 3/4 INCH MINIMUM AGGREGATE. ADEQUATE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AND PERIMETER PROTECTION BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. SPECIAL NOTES Site Address: /> CT• Assessor's Parcel Number: Project ID: LZ4P3 Construction Permit No.: PSPO I Estimated Construction Start Date.f/f/f4. Project Duration_- _Months Emergency Contact: Name: flJ (c41 _ 24 hour Phone: 1?5't_14.97( 4 Perceived Threat to Storm Water Quality El Medium tow If medium box is checked, in2ist attach a site plan sheet showing proposed work area and location of proposed structural BMPs For City Use Only OMPS Erosion Control Sediment Control BMPs g Control Tracki 'IPS Non-Storm star Management 8MPs Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control BMPs Best Management Practice (BMP) Description 4 0 CD . Crr'W I5 o 5 o Cl) .c 0 .Co . 2 it g i! CD CL 0)> 0) 0 &ia. g 0 w0 &5.E g so U) o Q. 0.00. - o >0 m w 8 U) .o Cot) 5 U) ido X . W am CASQA Designation 9 Construction Activity LU 00 LU ° 0 LU — • 0 LU LU U) '? LU U) 1' LU U) LU U) LU U) '?T LU U) LU U) • U) I— I— U) Z C? U) Z U) Z U) Z 1 C') Ic) c, - IV - - " .adlng/SoilDisturbance -- - - - - - - - - - - - - / *rrenchlng,Excavation -- - - Stockpiling -- - - ,6rjUfng/Boring -- - - - -- - -- toncret&Asphalt Sawcutting - - - - conreteflatwork - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - _Ping (qpnduiuPlpe Installation - - ccoIMortar Work --- §quipment steDisposal ginglLay Down Area Maintenance and Fueling /Hazardous Substance Use/Storage Dewatering Site Access Across Dirt Other (list): Instructions: Begin by reviewing the list of construction activities and checking the box to the left of any activity that will occur during the proposed construction. Add any other activity descriptions in the blank activity description boxes provided for that purpose and place a check in the box immediately to the left of the added activity description. For each activity descrribed, pick one or more best management practices (BMPs) from the list located alon the top of the form. Then place an X in the box at the place where the activity row intersects with the BMP column. Do this for each activity that was checked off and for each of the selected BMPs selected from the list. For Example - If the project includes site access across dirt, then check the box to the left of "Site Access Across Dirt". Then review the list for something that applies such as "Stabilized Construcion Ingress/Egress" under Tracking Control. Follow along the "Site Access Across Dirt" row until you get to the "Stabilized Construction Ingress/Egress" column and place an X in the box where the two meet As another example say the project included a stockpile that you intend to cover with a plastic sheet. Since plastic sheeting is not on the list of BMPs, then write in "Cover with Plastic" in the blank column under the heading Erosion Control BMPs. Then place an X in the box where "Stockpiling" row intersects the new "Cover with Plastic" column. To learn more about what each BUT description means, you may wish to review the BUT Reference Handout prepared to assist applicants in the selection of appropriate Best Management Practice measures. The reference also explains the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) designation and how to apply the various selected BMPs to a project PLANNING DEPARTMENT BUILDING PLAN CHECK REVIEW CHECKLIST Plan Check No. CB081283 Address 1850 TULE CT Planner GINA RUIZ —Phone(760)602- r467 APN: 215-504-01-00 Type of Project & Use: ADDITION Net Project Density: DU/AC Zoning: R-1 General Plan: RLM Facilities Management Zone: CFD (in/out) #_Date of participation:_____ Remaining net dev acres:_____ , . . (For non-residential development: Type of land used created by this permit: Circle One a) .c ti a) .c t a) i . ! Legend: Item Complete 0 Item Incomplete - Needs your action IZI U U Environmental Review Required: YES 0 NO Z TYPE DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: 0 0 Discretionary Action Required: YES 0 NO Z TYPE____ APPROVAL/RESO. NO. DATE PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions or approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval: 0 0 Coastal Zone Assessment/Compliance Project site located in Coastal Zone? YES JK NO Q CA Coastal Commission Authority? YES 0 NO JR If California Coastal Commission Authority: Contact them at - 7575 Metropolitan Drive, Suite 103, San Diego, CA 92108-4402; (619) 767-2370 Determine status (Coastal Permit Required or Exempt): EXEMPT 0 0 Habitat Management Plan Data Entry Completed? YES 0 NO Z If property has Habitat Type identified in Table 11 of HMP, complete HMP Permit application and assess fees in Permits Plus (A/P/Ds, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, HMP Fees, Enter Acres of Habitat Type impacted/taken, UPDATE!) IZI U U Inclusionary Housing Fee required: YES 0 NO (Effective date of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance - May 21, 1993.) Data Entry Completed? YES 0 NO 0 (AIPIDs, Activity Maintenance, enter CB#, toolbar, Screens, Housing Fees, Construct Housing Y/N, Enter Fee, UPDATE!) H:\ADMIN\Template\Building Plancheck Review Checklist.doc Rev 4/08 Site Plan: El El Provide a fully dimensional site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing Street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensional setbacks and existing topographical lines (including all side and rear yard slopes). Provide legal description of property and assessor's parcel number. Policy 44— Neighborhood Architectural Design Guidelines El El 1. Applicability: YES El NO IZI El El 2. Project complies: YES El NOD Zoning: 1. Setbacks: Front: Interior Side: Street Side: Rear: Top of slope: Required Shown Required 10'Shown 11 Required 10'Shown Required Shown Required Shown 2. Accessory structure setbacks: Front: Required Interior Side: Required Street Side: Required Rear: Required Structure separation: Required Shown Shown Shown Shown Shown Lot Coverage: Required <40% Shown <40% 0,4110 10 Height: Required, 30' Shown El El 5. Parking: Spaces Required 2 Shown (breakdown by uses for commercial and industrial projects required) Residential Guest Spaces Required Shown Z El El Additional Comments OK TO ISSUE AND ENTERED APPROVAL INTO COMPUTER GINA RUIZ DATE 7/3/08 H:'ADMIN\Template\Building Plancheck Review Checklist.doc Rev 4/08 EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 619 258-7901 FAX 619 258-7902 Mr. Mike Baykal 1850 Tule Court Carlsbad, California 92009 Subject: Report of Field Density Tests Proposed Two-Story Residential Addition 1850 Tule Court City of Carlsbad, California August 19, 2008 Project No. 08-1127E6 References: 1. "Foundation Plan and Details Review, Proposed Two-Story Residential Addition, 1850 Tule Court; City of Carlsbad, California", Project No. 08-1127E6, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated July 31, 2008. 2. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Two-Story Residential Addition, 1850 Tule Court, City of Carlsbad, California", Project No. 08-1127E6, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated July 22, 2008. Dear Mr. Baykal: This report presents the results of field density tests performed on the building pad for the proposed two-story addition at the subject site. In accordance with your request, in-place field density tests were performed in conformance with ASTM D1556 (Sand Cone Method). Grading was conducted between July 21 and 23, 2008 under the observation and testing of a representative of East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc. The results of the field density tests are presented on Page T-1 under "Table of Test Results". The laboratory determinations of the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content of the fill soils are set forth on Pages L-1 under "Laboratory Test Results". The approximate locations of the field density tests are shown on Plate No. 1. Following clearing and grubbing, i.e. the removal of vegetation, concrete waste and debris from the demolition of the existing patio, subgrade soils were overexcavated to depths of approximately 4 to 5 feet below finish pad grade and a minimum of 5 feet beyond proposed perimeter footings. The bottom of the excavation was scarified to a depth of approximately 6 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted. On-site fill soils consisting of clayey sand were placed in thin lifts and compacted in excess of 90 percent relative compaction while maintaining MIKE BAYKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 a moisture content about 5 percent over optimum. Compaction was achieved with the use of a sheepsfoot roller and a hand whacker. Based on our field observations and density test results, it is our opinion that the grading operation for the proposed two-story addition was performed in accordance with the referenced geotechnical investigation report and local grading ordinances. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully Submitted, oU J. No. GE 2704 Exp:Ilt° jza Mamadou Saliou Dial RCE 54071, GE 2704 MSD/md P.E. 2 1 MIKE BAYKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 PAGE T-1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS ASTM D1556 MAXIMUM DEPTH FEILD DRY DRY TEST SOIL OF FILL MOISTURE DENSITY DENSITY PERCENT NO. TYPE IN FEET %DRY WT. P.C.F. P.C.F COMPACTION 1 1 1.5 17.3 106.5 116.5 91 2 1 3 17.9 107.9 116.5 93 3 1 2 16.9 109.3 116.5 94 4 1 4FG 17.1 110.9 116.5 95 5 1 5FG 16.8 106.6 116.5 92 REMARKS PG = FINISH GRADE 3 MIKE BA YKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 PAGE L-1 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS RESULTS OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the fill materials as determined by ASTM D1557, Procedures A and B which uses 25 blows of a 10 pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 4 inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction cylinder and Procedure C which uses 56 blows of a 10 pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 6 inch diameter 1/13.3 cubic foot compaction cylinder are presented as follows: OPTIMUM MAXIMUM MOISTURE SOIL TYPE/ DRY DENSITY CONTENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION LB/ CU. FT. % DRY WT. 1/A BROWN CLAYEY SAND 116.5 12.0 EXPANSION INDEX TEST (ASTM D4829) INITIAL SATURATED INITIAL DRY MOISTURE MOISTURE DENSITY EXPANSION CONTENT(%) CONTENT(%) (PCF) INDEX 13.7 27.7 101.3 63 2'klll 16 O,C/L u' 'Vc/71/ 77 EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION & ENGINEERING, INC. 10925. HARTLEY RD.. SUITE 1. SANTEE, CA 92071 (619) 258-7901 Fax (619) 258-7902 ,h'/,e L4q7c#v Oi • AIEZ,0 /71/ 7j73- GE /9,zi3 C(7 O8I:2 EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD SUITE I SANTEE CALIFORNIA 92071 619 258-7901 fax 619 258-7902 Mr. Mike Baykal July 31, 2008 1850 Tule Court Carlsbad, California 92009 Project No. 08-1 127E6 Subject: . Foundation Plan and Details Review Proposed Two-Story Residential Addition 1850 Tule Court City of Carlsbad, California Reference: "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Two-Story Residential Addition, 1850 Tule Court, City of Carlsbad, California", Project No. 08-1127E6, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated July 22, 2008. Dear Mr. Baykal: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the foundation plan and details prepared by James A. Chinn, Architect of Del Mar, California for the proposed two-story, residential addition to be located at 1850 Tule Court, in the City of Carlsbad, California. The foundation plan and details were found to be in substantial conformance with the recommendations provided in the referenced geotechnical report. Our firm should observe the foundation excavations for proper size and embedment into competent bearing soils. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, r si No. GE 2704 Exp: t- '°M Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P.E. RCE 54071, GE 2704 MSD\md oD&I 2&3 EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 (619) 258-7901 Fax 258-7902 Mr. Mike Baykal 1850 Tule Court Carlsbad, California 92009 Subject: Limited Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Two-Story Residential Addition 1850 Tule Court City of Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Baykal: July 22, 2008 Project No. 08-1127E6 In accordance with your request, we have performed a limited investigation of the soil conditions at the subject site to provide the soil engineering criteria for site grading and recommend an appropriate foundation system for the proposed residential addition. Our investigation has found that the area of the proposed addition is underlain by undocumented fill and colluvium to a maximum depth of approximately 5 feet below existing grade. Dense sandstone of the Santiago Formation was underlying the colluvium to the explored depth of 6 feet. It is our opinion that, the proposed addition is geotechnically feasible provided the recommendations herein are implemented in the design and construction. Should you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please do not hesitate to contact our office. Respectfully submitted, Mamadou Saliou Diallo, P.E. RCE 54071, GE 2704 MSD/md MIKE BA YKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................4 SCOPEOF SERVICES ......................................................................................................................4 PROJECTBACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................4 SiteDescription.......................................................................................................................4 ProposedConstruction............................................................................................................4 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING........................................................4 SubsurfaceExploration ............................................................................................................ 4 LaboratoryTesting Program...................................................................................................5 GEOLOGY..........................................................................................................................................5 GeologicSetting......................................................................................................................5 SiteStratigraphy......................................................................................................................5 GEOTECHNICALEVALUATION ..................................................................................................6 CompressibleSoils ................................................................................................................... 6 ExpansiveSoils .......................................................................................................................6 Groundwater............................................................................................................................6 GeologicHazards ............................................................................................. ....................... 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................7 GRADINGAND EARTHWORK .................................................................................................7 Clearingand Grubbing............................................................................................................7 Structural Improvement of Soils.............................................................................................7 Transitions Between Cut and Fill............................................................................................8 Method and Criteria of Compaction.......................................................................................8 ErosionControl .......................................................................................................................8 StandardGrading Guidelines ................................................................................................... 8 FOUNDATIONSAND SLABS ... ..................................................................................................... 9 SETTLEMENT...................................................................................................................................9 TEMPORARYSLOPES .....................................................................................................................9 TRENCHBACKFILL ......................................................................................................................10 DRAINAGE......................................................................................................................................10 FOUNDATIONPLAN REVIEW....................................................................................................10 2 MIKE BAYKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION .........................................................................................10 ADDITIONALSERVICES .............................................................................................................11 PLATES Plate 1- Location of Exploratory Boreholes Plate 2 - Summary Sheet (Exploration Borehole Logs)• Plate 3 - USCS Soil Classification Chart LABORATORYTESTING..............................................................................................................13 REFERENCES..................................................................................................................................14 91 MIKE BAYKAL PROJECTNO. 08-1127E6 INTRODUCTION This is to present the findings and conclusions of a limited geotechnical investigation for a proposed two-story addition to the existing residence located at 1850 Tule Court, in the City of Carlsbad, California. The objectives of the investigation were to evaluate the existing soils conditions and provide recommendations for the proposed construction. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following services were provided during this investigation: •Site reconnaissance and review of published geologic, seismological and geotechnical reports and maps pertinent to the project area Subsurface exploration consisting of two (2) boreholes within the limits of the proposed area of improvement. The boreholes were logged by our Staff Geologist. Collection of representative soil samples at selected depths. The obtained samples were sealed in moisture-resistant containers and transported to the laboratory for subsequent analysis. Laboratory testing of samples representative of the types of soils encountered during the field investigation Geologic and engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data, which provided the basis for our conclusions and recommendations Production of this report, which summarizes the results of the above analysis and presents our findings and recommendations for site improvement SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The subject site is an irregularly shaped residential lot located on the northeast corner of Manzanita Street and Tule Court in the City of Carlsbad, California. A single-story house occupies the property. The building pad is relatively level with general drainage to the south. It is our understanding the proposed construction will include an addition to the back of the existing house. The addition will be two-story, wood-framed and founded on continuous footings with a slab-on-grade floor. FIELD INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TESTING On July 9, 2008, two (2) boreholes were drilled to a maximum depth of approximately 6.0 feet below existing grade with a hand auger. The approximate locations of the boreholes are shown on the attached Plate No. 1, entitled "Location of Exploiatory Boreholes". A continuous log of the MIKE BA YKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 soils encountered was recorded at the time of drilling and is shown on Plate No. '2 entitled "Summary Sheet". The soils were visually and texturally classified according to the filed identification procedures set forth on the attached Plate No. 3 entitled "USCS Soil Classification". Following the field exploration, laboratory testing was performed to evaluate the pertinent engineering properties of .the foundation materials. The laboratory-testing program included moisture and density, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, particle size analysis and expansion index tests. These tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM standards and other accepted test methods. Page L-1 and Plate No. 2 provide a summary of the laboratory test results. GEOLOGY Geologic Setting The subject site is located within the southern portion of what is known as the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of California. The inland areas of the province in Carlsbad are typically made up of sandstone of the Santiago Formation and volcanic rocks of the Santiago Peak Volcanics. Site Stratigraphy The subsurface descriptions provided are interpreted from conditions exposed during the field investigation and/or inferred from the geologic literature. As such, all of the subsurface conditions may not be represented. Detailed descriptions of the subsurface materials encountered during the field investigation are presented on the exploration logs provided on Plate No. 2. The following paragraphs provide general descriptions of the encountered soil types. Undocumented Fill Undocumented fill, soils were observed in the boreholes to depths of approximately 12 inches and 4 feet below existing grade. They generally consisted of reddish and tan brown, sandy clay that was moist to wet and soft to medium stiff in consistency. Colluvium Colluvium was underlying the fill and consisted of dark gray sandy clay that was very moist and medium stiff in consistency. The thickness of the colluvium was approximately 1 t 2 feet. Santiago Formation (Tsa Bedrock materials associated with sandstone of the Santiago Formation were encountered below the colluvium. They generally consisted of light gray to tan, silty fine sand. The moisture content was high and the materials were medium dense to dense in consistency. MIKE BAYKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION Based on our field investigation and evaluation of the collected information, we conclude that the proposed residential addition is feasible from a geotechnical standpoint provided the recommendations herein will be properly implemented during construction. In order to provide a uniform support for the addition, overexcavation and recompaction of the structural portion of the building pad will be required. The foundations may consist of reinforced continuous footings with conventional reinforced slabs. Recommendations and criteria for foundation design are provided in the Foundation and Slab Recommendations section of this report. Compressible Soils Our field observations and testing indicate low compressibility within the sedimentary bedrock, which underlies the site. However, loose to medium dense fill and colluvium were typically encountered to a depth of approximately 3 to 5 feet below surface grades. These soils are compressible. Due to the potential for soil compression upon loading, remedial grading of these near-surface soils (including overexcavation and recompaction) will be required. Following implementation of the earthwork recommendations presented herein, the potential for soil compression resulting from the new development has been estimated to be low. The low-settlement assessment assumes a well-planned and maintained site drainage system. Recommendations regarding mitigation by earthwork construction are presented in the Grading and Earthwork Recommendations section of this report. Expansive Soils Expansion index tests were performed on representative samples of the fill and colluvium to determine volumetric change characteristics with change in moisture content. Expansion indexes of 55 and 73 respectively were obtained which indicate a medium expansion potential for the foundation soils. Groundwater Static groundwater was not encountered to the depths of the boreholes. The building pad is located at an elevation of approximately 150 feet above Mean Sea Level. However, saturated soil conditions were encountered at shallow depths in the boreholes. Recommendations to prevent or mitigate the effects of poor surface drainage are presented in the Drainage section of this report. Geologic Hazards A review of the active fault maps pertaining to the site indicates the existence of the Rose Canyon Fault Zone approximately 7 km to the west. Ground shaking from this fault or one of the major active faults in the region is the most likely happening to affect the site. With respect to this hazard, the site is comparable to others in the general area. The proposed residential addition should be MIKE BA YKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 PARAMETER VALUE 2007 CBC REFERENCE Site Class D Table 1613.5.2 Mapped Spectral Acceleration For Short Periods, S 1.25 Figure 1613.5(3) Mapped Spectral Acceleration For a 1-Second Period, S1 0.5 Figure 1613.5(4) Site Coefficient, Fa 1.0 Table 1613.5.3(1) Site Coefficient, F 1.5 Table 1613.5.3(2) Based on the absence of shallow groundwater and general consistency of the formational materials, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction is very low. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusions and recommendations are based upon the analysis of the data and information obtained from our soil investigation. This includes site reconnaissance; field investigation; laboratory testing and our general knowledge of the soils native to the site. The site is suitable for the proposed residential addition provided the recommendations set forth are implemented during construction. GRADING AND EARTHWORK Based upon the proposed construction and the information obtained during the field investigation, we anticipate that the addition will be founded on continuous footings, which are supported entirely by properly compacted fill. The following grading and earthwork recommendations are based upon the limited geotechnical investigation performed, and should be verified during construction by our field representative. Clearing and Grubbing All areas to be graded or to receive fill and/or structures should be cleared of vegetation. Vegetation and the debris from the clearing operation should be properly disposed of off-site. The area should be thoroughly inspected for any possible buried objects, which need to be rerouted or removed prior to the inception of, or during grading. All holes, trenches, or pockets left by the removal of these objects should be properly backfihled with compacted fill materials as recommended in the Method and Criteria of Compaction section of this report. Structural Improvement of Soils Information obtained from our field and laboratory analysis indicates that loose to medium dense fill and colluvium cover the site to depths of approximately 3 to 5 feet below existing grade. These soils are susceptible to settlement upon loading. Based upon the soil characteristics, we recommend the following: Subgrade soils to a minimum depth of approximately 5 feet below existing grade should be removed within the area of the proposed addition. The bottom of the removal area should expose competent materials as approved by ECSC&E geotechnical representative. Prior to 7 MIKE BAYKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 the placement of new fill, the bottom of the removal area should be scarified a minimum depth of 8 inches, moisture-conditioned within 2 percent above the optimum moisture content, and then recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D-1557 test method). The limit of the required area of overexcavation should be extended a minimum of 5 feet laterally beyond the perimeter footing (building footprint). * Soils utilized as fill should be moisture-conditioned and recompacted in conformance with the following Method and Criteria of Compaction section of this report. The depth and extent of any overexcavation and recompaction should be evaluated in the field by a representative of ECSC&E. Transitions Between Cut and Fill The proposed addition is anticipated to be founded entirely in properly compacted fill. Cut to fill transitions below the proposed structure should be eliminated during the earthwork construction as required in the previous section. Method and Criteria of Compaction Compacted fills should consist of approved soil material, free of trash debris, roots, vegetation or other deleterious materials. Fill soils should be compacted by suitable compaction equipment in uniform loose lifts of 6 to 8 inches. Unless otherwise specified, all soils subjected to recompaction should be moisture-conditioned within 2 to 4 percent above the optimum moisture content and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction per ASTM test method D1557. The on-site soils, after being processed to delete the aforementioned deleterious materials, may be used for recompaction purposes. Should any importation of fill be planned, the intended import source(s) should be evaluated and approved by ECSC&E prior to delivery to the site. Care should be taken to ensure that these soils are not detrimentally expansive. Erosion Control Due to the granular characteristics of the existing fill soils, areas of recent grading or exposed ground may be subject to erosion. During construction, surface water should be controlled via berms, sandbags, silt fences, straw wattles, siltation basins, positive surface grades or other method to avoid damage to the finish work or adjoining properties. All site entrances and exits must have coarse gravel or steel shaker plates to minimize offsite sediment tracking. Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be used to protect storm drains and minimize pollution. The contractor should take measures to prevent erosion of graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. After completion of grading, all excavated surfaces should exhibit positive drainage and eliminate areas where water might pond. Standard Grading Guidelines Grading and earthwork should be conducted in accordance with the standard-of-practice methods for this local, the guidelines of the current edition of the Uniform Building Code, and the requirements of 8 MIKE BA YKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 the jurisdictional agency. Where the information provided in the geotechnical report differs from the Standard Grading Guidelines, the requirements outlined in the report shall govern. FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS The following recommendations are based on the foundation soils exhibiting a medium expansion potential. Should the building pad be capped with at least a 3-foot layer of granular, non-expansive fill soils, foundation size and reinforcement may be reduced. Continuous footings are suitable for use and should extend to a minimum depth of 24 inches below the lowest adjacent grade for the two-story addition into the properly compacted fill soils, Continuous footings should be at least 15 inches in width and reinforced with four #5 steel bars; two bars placed near the top of the footings and the other two bars placed near the bottom of the footings. Interior concrete floor slabs should be a minimum 4 inches thick. Reinforcement should consist of #3 bars placed at 12 inches on center each way within the middle third of the slabs by supporting the steel on chairs or concrete blocks "dobies". The slabs should be underlain by 2 inches of clean sand over a lO-mil visqueen moisture barrier and a capillary break at least 4 inches thick, consisting of coarse sand, gravel or crushed rock not exceeding 3/4 inch in size with no more than 5 percent passing the #200 sieve. The effect of concrete shrinkage will result in cracks in virtually all concrete slabs. To reduce the extent of shrinkage, the concrete should be placed at a maximum of 4 inch slump. The minimum steel recommended is not intended to prevent shrinkage cracks. An allowable soil bearing value of 2,000 pounds per square foot may be used for the design of the above footings founded into the properly compacted fill soil as set forth in the 2007 California Building Code, Table 1804.2. This value may be increased by 400 psf for each additional foot of width or depth to a maximum value of 4,000 lb/ft2. Lateral resistance to horizontal movement may be provided by the soil passive pressure and friction of concrete to soil. An allowable passive pressure of 150 pounds per square foot per foot of depth may be used. A coefficient of friction of 0.25 is recommended. The soils passive pressure as well as the bearing value may be increased by 1/3 for wind and seismic loading. SETTLEMENT Settlement of compacted fill soils is normal and should be anticipated. Because of the minor thickness of the fill soils anticipated under the proposed footings and the light building loads, total and differential settlements. should be within acceptable limits. TEMPORARY SLOPES Excavations for foundations or on-site utility trenches may be made vertically for shallow depths and must be either shored or sloped at 1H: 1V for depths greater than 4 feet; OSHA guidelines for trench excavation safety should be observed during construction. MIKE BA YKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 TRENCH BACKFILL Excavations for utility lines, which extend under structural areas should be properly backfihled and compacted. Utilities should be bedded and backfihled with clean sand or approved granular soil to a depth of at least one foot over the pipe. This backfill should be uniformly watered and compacted to a firm condition for pipe support. The remainder of the backfill should be on-site soils or non- expansive imported soils, which should be placed in thin lifts, moisture-conditioned and compacted to at least 90% relative compaction. DRAINAGE Adequate measures should be undertaken to properly finish grade the site after the addition and other improvements are in place, such that the drainage water within the site and adjacent properties .is directed away from the foundations, footings, floor slabs and the tops of slopes via rain gutters, downspouts, surface swales and subsurface drains towards the natural drainage for this area. A minimum gradient of 1 percent is recommended in hardscape areas. For earth areas, a minimum gradient of 5 percent away from all structures for a distance of at least 5 feet should be provided. Earth swales should have a minimum gradient of 2 percent. Drainage should be directed to approved drainage facilities. Proper surface and subsurface drainage will be required to minimize the potential of water seeking the level of the bearing soils under the foundations, footings and floor slabs, which may otherwise result in undermining and differential settlement of the new addition and other improvements. FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Foundation plans should be reviewed by our firm during the design phase to assure conformance with the intent of this report. During construction foundation excavations should be observed by our representative prior to the placement of forms, reinforcement or concrete for conformance with the plans and specifications. LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION Our investigation was performed using the skill and degree of care ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable soils engineers and geologists practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. This report is prepared for the sole use of our client and may not be assigned to others without the written consent of the client and ECSC&E, Inc. The samples collected and used for testing, and the observations made, are believed representative of site conditions; however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly between exploration borings, test pits and surface exposures. As in most major projects, conditions revealed by construction excavations may vary with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by a representative of ECSC&E and designs adjusted as required or alternate designs recommended. 10 MIKE BAYKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 This report is issued with the understanding that it,, is the responsibility of the owner, or of his representative to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the project architect and engineer. Appropriate recommendations should be incorporated into the structural plans. The necessary steps should be taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. The findings of this report are valid as of this present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside of our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and should be updated after a period of two years. ADDITIONAL SERVICES The review of plans and specifications, field observations and testing under our direction are integral parts of the recommendations made in this report. If East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc. is not retained for these services, the client agrees to assume our responsibility for any potential claims that may arise during construction. Observations and testing are additional services, which are provided by our firm, and should be budgeted within the cost of development. Plates No. 1 through 3, Page L-1 and References are parts of this report. Respectfully Q\4 No. GE 2704 r Exp: Mamadou Saliou Dial RCE 54071, GE 2704 MSD/md 11 MIKE BAYKAL PROJECTNO. 08-1127E6 PLATE NO. 2 SUMMARY SHEET BOREHOLE NO. 1 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Y M Surface UNDOCUMENTED FILL (QuO dark brown, moist, loose, porous, silty fine sand with organics 0.5' reddish brown moist, loose to medium dense clayey sand 2.0' tan brown, very moist to wet, loose to medium dense clayey sand 3.5' 96 101.0 21.1 4.0' COLLUVIUM (Qcol) dark gray, very moist, medium stiff sandy clay 5.0 SANTIAGO FORMATION (Tsa) light gray to tan, moist, medium dense to dense, silty fine sand 6.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 7/9/08 BOREHOLE NO.2 DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION Y Surface UNDOCUMENTED FILL (QuO reddish brown, moist, loose, porous, silty fine sand 1.0' COLLUVIUM (Qcol) dark gray, very moist to wet, medium stiff sandy clay 2.0' cc 6494 cc 99 99.4 3.0' SANTIAGO FORMATION (Tsa) light gray to tan, moist, medium dense to dense, silty fine sand 100.5 4.0' bottom of borehole, no caving, no groundwater borehole backfilled 7/9/08 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y = DRY DENSITY IN PCF M = MOISTURE CONTENT IN % 12 M 17.9 16.9 to 0 MAJOR DIVISIONS SYMBOL DESCRIPTION GW WELL GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL- SAND MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GP GRAVELS (MORE THAN ', POORLY GRADED GRAVELS OR GRAVEL-SAND OF COARSE MIXTURES, LITTLE OR NO FINES GM FRACTION >NO. 4 SIEVE SILTY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-SILT MIXTURES COARSE SIZE) GC GRAINED SOILS CLAYEY GRAVELS, GRAVEL-SAND-CLAY MIXTURES (MORE THAN /z OF SOIL> Sw NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE) WELL GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, LITTLE OR NO FINES SP SANDS (MORE THAN ', POORLY GRADED SANDS OR GRAVELLY SANDS, OF COARSE LITTLE OR NO FINES SM FRACTION < NO. 4 SIEVE SILTY SANDS, SILT-SAND MIXTURES SIZE) SC CLAYEY SANDS, SAND-CLAY MIXTURES ML INORGANIC SILTS AND VERY FINE SANDS, ROCK SILTS & FLOUR, SILTY OR CLAYEY FINE SANDS OR CLAYEY SILTS WITH SLIGHT PLASTICITY CLAYS CL INORGANIC CLAYS OF LOW TO MEDIUM LIQUID LIMIT PLASTICITY, GRAVELLY CLAYS, SANDY CLAYS, <50 __________ SILTY CLAYS. LEAN CLAYS OL FINE GRAINED SOILS ORGANIC SILTS AND ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS OF LOW PLASTICITY (MORE THAN '/2 OF SOIL < MH NO. 200 SIEVE SIZE) INORGANIC SILTS, MICACEOUS OR DIATOMACEOUS SILTS & FINE SANDY OR SILTY SOILS, ELASTIC SILTS CH CLAYS LIQUID LIMIT INORGANIC CLAYS OF HIGH PLASTICITY, FAT >50 CLAYS OH ORGANIC CLAYS OF MEDIUM TO HIGH PLASTICITY, ORGANIC SILTY CLAYS, ORGANIC SILTS HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS Pt PEAT AND OTHER HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS CLASSIFICATION CHART (UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM) 70 CLASSIFICATION RANGE OF GRAIN SIZES U.S. STANDARD GRAIN SIZE IN SIEVE SIZE MILLIMETERS BOULDERS Above 12 Inches Above 305 COBBLES 12 Inches To 3 Inches 305 To 76.2 GRAVEL 3 Inches to No. 4 76.2 to 4.76 Coarse 3 Inches to '/ Inch 76.2 to 19.1 Fine '/1 Inch to No. 4 19.1 to 4.76 SAND No. 4 to No. 200 4.76 to 0.074 Coarse No. 4 to No. 10 4.76 to 2.00 Medium No. 10 to No. 40 2.00 to 0.420 Fine I No. 40 to No. 200 0.420 to 0.074 SILT AND CLAY I Below No. 200 Below 0.074 GRAIN SIZE CHART - 0 tO 20 30 10 50 dO 70 dO dO tOO UQUIO UMIF (un. PLASTICITY CHART EAST COUNTY SOIL CONSULTATION AND ENGINEERING, INC. 10925 HARTLEY ROAD, SUITE "I" SANTEE, CALIFORNIA 92071 U.S.C.S. SOIL CLASSIFICATION MIKE BAYK.AL PROJECT PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 PLATE NO. 3 JULY 22, 2008 MIKE BAYKAL PROJECTNO. 08-1127E6 PAGE L-1 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS.,' MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY AND OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (ASTM D1557) The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture, contents of the fill materials as determined by ASTM D1557, Procedures A and B which use 25 blows of a 10-pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 4-inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction cylinder and Procedure C which uses 56 blows of a 10-pound slide hammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 equal layers in a 6-inch diameter 1/13.3 cubic foot compaction cylinder are presented as follows: OPTIMUM MAXIMUM MOISTURE SOIL TYPE/ . . DRY DENSITY CONTENT PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION (PCF) (%) LOCATION 1/A REDDISH BROWN CLAYEY SAND 122.0 . 11.7 BH-1 @ 3.0' EXPANSION INDEX TEST (ASTM D4829) INITIAL MOISTURE CONTENT(%) SATURATED' MOISTURE CONTENT(%) INITIAL DRY DENSITY (PCF) EXPANSION INDEX LOCATION 12.3 32.5 96.8 55 BH-1 @3.0' 14.8 33.8 94.9 73 BH-1 @ 4.0' PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM D422) U S Standard r'' Sieve Size .. Percent Passing' ' - ' - , BH1 @, 0,,. ov Percentassinz BH-L@ "BH-1 , E,'4 ' lPercent Passing r SahtiagoFormatin' 1" 1/2" .- . - 100 3/8" - - 98 #4 100 - 97 #8 99 100 96 #16 97 98 90 #30 94 95 86 #50 85 87 76 #100 62 70 28 #200 45 57 .' 9 USCS SC CL SP-SM 13 MIKE BA YKAL PROJECT NO. 08-1127E6 REFERENCES 1. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Two-Story Residential Addition, 3434 Madison Street, City of Carlsbad, California", Project No. 08-1106E6, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated April 3, 2008. "Limited Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Two-Story Residential Addition, 3886 Westhaven Drive, APN 207-053-28, City of Carlsbad, California", Project No. 07-1106H5, Prepared by East County Soil Consultation and Engineering, Inc., Dated July 8, 2007. "2007 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2", Published by International Code Council. "Geotechnical and Foundation Engineering: Design and Construction", by Robert W. Day, 1999. "1997 Uniform Building Code, Volume 2, Structural Engineering Design Provisions", Published by International Conference of Building Officials. "Maps of Known Active Fault Near-Source Zones in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada to be used with 1997 Uniform Building Code", Published by International Conference of Building Officials. "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California", Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, by Siang S. Tan and Michael P. Kennedy, 1996. "Foundations and Earth Structures, Design Manual 7.2", by Department of Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command, May 1982, Revalidated by Change 1 September 1986. 14 08/0/2800' 07:57 8587558186 DESIGN BUILD PARTNER PAGE 01 AUG-t6-2008 FRI 0321 P11 CITY OF CARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8658 P. 02 City.--of C a r Is ball ThIS form must be completed by the City, thiIIij andthi'áiupriati school distrlc.ts and returned to the City -prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issd# snybuilding permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name Baykail Residence Building Permit Plan Check Number: C8081283 - Project Address: 1850 Tule.Ct. A.P.N.: 215.504.01-00 Project Applicant Katherine Baykall • (Owner Name): Project Description: 1420sf Addition Building Type: 8F0 Residential: • New Dwelling Unit(s) Square Feet 01 Living Area in New Dwelling Second Dwelling Unit: - Square Feat of Living Area in SOU Residential Additions: 1420 Net Square Feet New Area Commercial/industrial: Net Square Feet New Area City Certification of Applicant Information: J..VLetAZtZLq Date: 0811512 a08 SCHOOLI1 STRICTS WITHI N THE CITY OF CARLSBAD Carkbad Unified School Phiriw 0 Viili Unified School PIlIPtOt fl San Marcos Unified School ]District 6225 El Camino Real Carlsbad CA 92009 (33 1 .5000) 1234 Arcadia Drive 215 MOISWY Vista CA 92083 (726.2170) San Mireos, CA 92069(290.2619) Contact; Nancy Dolce(ByAppt. Only) 0 Encinitas union School District 0 Sao Olegulto Baton High School District lOt South Rancho Santa Fe Rd 710 E.niia. SM: Encb,ltas, CA 92024 (944-4300 cxl 166) Bncinitss, CA 92024 (7534491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ('Owner) c.'tiflea under penally of psqwy that (1) the information provided above Is correct and We to the boat of the Owners knowledge, and that the Owner will Ills an amended certifIcation of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an IncrOses in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the Initial determInatIon at units or square footage It found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration Is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. :::; - 08/18/2008 07:57 8587558186 DESIGN BUILD PARTNER PAGE 02 AUG-15-2008 FRI 03:22 PM CITY OF OARSLBAD FAX NO. 760 602 8558 P. 03 SCHOOL DIS1 (To be cc THIS FORM INDICATES THAT PROJECTH SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION ad by the school district(s)) SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duty authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may Issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE ' WALTER FREEMAN —ASS1S1ANTSUPERINThNDENP- - NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 625ELCAMThTOREAL DATE CALSBAD, CA 92009 PHONE NUMBER 7(ôo3-zjOcO ftcvid M=006 E CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT JEFFERSON ELEMENTARY 7 A VIA PA OAKS ELEMENTARY E CARLSBAD HIGH SCHOOL MAGNOLIA ELEMENTARY A VIA PA OAKS MIDDLE SCHOOL Receipt No. E CARLSBAD VILLAGE ACADEMY CALA VERA HILLS SCHOOL PACIFIC RIM El VALLEY MIDDLE SCHOOL KELLEY SCHOOL CALA VERA HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL 26809 BUENA VISTA SCHOOL HOPE SCHOOL OTHER RECEIVED FROM:KdAAj 1)2 PAM (<.L.J DATE: 0 (If Applicable) PARENT OF / SC) 1t(L CII PAYMENT FOR: ACCOUNT NUMBER AMOUNT gd-(OL( RECEIVED BY: CASH - CHECK # S TOTAL : t ON ¼.- 7 8- To C1 -t-- -frti ss, EME j rrzcr. IiO SóiL 4 -21-7 /(D& .QtA c R2 ) l'4jo 7r/oy &I L- U-rn /#n 7 )&J 47 5TLQ ,t44A?G41 Lk W/4ty, Jud /4/oc wo lsr'L- CAr' C8081283 1850 TULE CT BAYKAL: 1420SF ADDITION: 590SF 1ST FLR, 830SF 2ND FU 338SF DECK Dcorrsrri . r Approved flat By Building (7f5O Planning Engineering - Fire Health HazMatlAir Quality Comments Date Building 1/P_tm f/bfOQ' Planning Engineering Fire Forms/Fees Sent Recd School dA f' ,JN CFD V N PFF Y P E & M 7!1!0 7f Special Insp. Y Fire V N Sewer / YN Fees compiete'41A Application & RelaJd Docs. Complete P 1040 & Fc- ?2s/ - ,- to /, Te4Q 04 ed +ru 4 cWA' -%.e &-& ON rcecc iiu /0 —2q-oP-/-,tow CAa pAe zi% CA P0 øt 5( aa 4eft7