Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2452 TUTTLE ST; ; CB042599; Permit
cy-, rT6' City of Carlsbad 1635 Faraday Av Carlsbad, CA 92008 [i1;iII1Is1 Residential Permit Permit No: CB042599 Building Inspection Request Line (760) 602-2725 Job Address: Permit Type: Parcel No: Valuation: Occupancy Group: # Dwelling Units: Bedrooms: Project Title: 2452 TUTTLE ST CBAD RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD 1551604000 Lot #: 0 $185,194.00 Construction Type: NEW Reference #: 0 Structure Type: 0 Bathrooms: 0 RODRIGUEZ RES-ADD 868 SF & REMODEL 930 SF Status: ISSUED Applied: 06/30/2004 Entered By: RMA Plan Approved: 05/09/2005 Issued: 05/09/2005 Inspect Area: Orig PC#: Plan Check#: Applicant: Owner: RODRIGUEZ MARIO&PATRICE RODRIGUEZ MARIO&PATRICE 2452 TUTTLE ST 2452 TUTTLE ST CARLSBAD CA 92008 CARLSBAD CA 92008 Building Permit $811.44 Meter Size Add'I Building Permit Fee $0.00 Add'I Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Plan Check $527.44 Meter Fee $0.00 Add'l Plan Check Fee $0.00 SDCWA Fee $0.00 Plan Check Discount $0.00 CFD Payoff Fee $0.00 Strong Motion Fee $18.52 PFF $0.00 Park in Lieu Fee $0.00 PFF (CFD Fund) $0.00 Park Fee $0.00 License Tax $0.00 LFM Fee $0.00 License Tax (CFD Fund) $0.00 Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact Fee $0.00 Other Bridge Fee $0.00 Traffic Impact (CFD Fund)' $0.00 BTD #2 Fee $0.00 Sidewalk Fee $0.00 BTD #3 Fee $0.00 PLUMBING TOTAL $118.00 Renewal Fee $0.00 ELECTRICAL TOTAL $60.00 Add'I Renewal Fee $0.00 MECHANICAL TOTAL $37.00 Other Building Fee $0.00 Housing Impact Fee $0.00 Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Housing InLieu Fee $0.00 Meter Size Housing Credit Fee $0.00 Add'I Pot. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Master Drainage Fee $0.00 Red. Water Con. Fee $0.00 Sewer Fee $0.00 Additional Fees $0.00 TOTAL PERMIT FEES $1,572.40 Total Fees: $1,572.40 Total Payments To Date: $527.44 Balance Due: $1,044.96 lip 7850 05/09/05 0002 01 02 COP 1044'96 Inspector: _____________ FINAL APPROVAL Date: Clearance: NOTICE: Please take NOTICE that approval of your project includes the "Imposition" of fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions hereafter collectively referred to as "fees/exactions." You have 90 days from the date this permit was issued to protest imposition of these fees/exactions. If you protest them, you must follow the protest procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020(a), and file the protest and any other required information with the City Manager for processing in accordance with Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 3.32.030. Failure to timely follow that procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul their imposition. You are hereby FURTHER NOTIFIED that your right to protest the specified fees/exactions DOES NOT APPLY to water and sewer connection fees and capacity changes, nor planning, zoning, grading or other similar application processing or service fees in connection with this project. NOR DOES IT APPLY to any FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PLAN CHECK NO.________ ET;VAL. 9y Plan Ck. Deposit / / J 7 L111 Validated By , I' 11A— PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF A I g19 - OM P7-; k R-T ME N' T 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92008 Address (include Bldg/Suite #) Business Name (at this address) Legal Description Lot No. Subdivision Name/Number , Unit No. Phase No. Total # of units /55-/O- 4-O ssessor's Parcel \ I'Oo 5'/1If;/7de4c4e/• - m e. Existing Use 1 Proposed Use Descri tion of Work j SQ. FT. #of Stories # of Bedrooms # of Bathrooms M. re5 L, fle5/ir 'f°'6 vi5r (JaIver9 (A1!de /c'#7'C')fr rrfl Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any city or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to'file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law [Chapter-9, commending with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code] or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars l$5001). Name Address City State/Zip Telephone # State License # License Class City Business License // Designer Name 5$4f' f7 Address 4o2 f,ç7 '/qf45City /d(State/Zip Telephone (7o) 4,17.-. 7Cj State License# b-H'• 297-2166 Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for workers' compensation as provided by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. - I have and will maintain workers' compensation, as required by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. My worker's compensation insurance carrier and policy number are: Insurance Company Policy No. Expiration Date__________________ (THIS SECTION NEED NOT BE COMPLETED IF THE PERMIT IS FOR ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS [$1001 OR LESS) CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. - WARNING: Failure to secure workers' compensation coverage is unlawful, and shall subject an employer to criminal penalties and civil fines up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). in addition to the cost of compensation, damages as provided for In Section 3706 of the Labor code, interest and attorney's fees. fSIGNATURE DATE (h OWNER BUILDER DECJON -: / I hereby-affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: •- - - 1 0 I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not, apply to an owner-of property who builds or imprOves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). 0 I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. -7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: - - - I personally plan to provide the major labor and materials for construction of the proposed property improvement. YES ONO - I (have / have not) signed an application for a building permit for the proposed work. I have contracted with the following person (firm) to provide the proposed construction (include name I address / phone number / contractors license -number):I. I plan to provide portiàns of the work, but I have hired the following person to coordinate, supervise and provide the major work (include name / address / phone number I contractors license number): oel - I will provide some of the work, p4l have cant c d (hid) the following ppons to provide the work indicated (include name / address / phone number / type of work): -- - IlL L V OWNER SIGNATURE Is the applicant or future building ocupant required to submit &UUsiness kanjacutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner HazarcToRis Substance Account Act? 0 YES 0 NO - Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district, or air qullity management district? 0 YES 0 NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of, a- school site? 0 YES 0 NO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. 18'CONSTRUCTION LENDING I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME - . - LENDER'S ADDRESS - - - - Ig~—',"~A~PP.Li~qANLqERT.IFICATiOt4 I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct and that the information on the plans is accurate. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the Cit' of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned - property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE, INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL' LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS-PERMIT. OSHA: An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5'0 deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. EXPIRATION: Every permit issued by the building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 106.4.4 Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE - ' - - . - - - DATE' - WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance List 1- Permit-Type From the following list, determine the permit-type that best describes the work you propose to do. Please put the code of that permit-type in the blank at the top of the page on the front of this application. Residential permits (only) also require the identification of the structure-type to be associated with the permit. Choose a structure-type from 'List 2 - Structure-Type? and put its code in the appropriate blank on the front of this application. Residential Permits Code Description APT Apartments - new construction. CONDO Condominiums - new construction. CVNNR Conversion. Convert all or a portion of a non-residential building to residential use, creating one or more new residential units. CVNRN Conversion. Convert one or more residences in a building to zion-residential usage. ) CVNRR Conversion. Increase or reduce the number of dwelling units in a residential structure through interior modifications (i.e.: a four bedroom house converted to a duplex, with 2 bedrooms each). DEMO Demolition permit. (Also specify type of structure from List 2). DUP Duplex - new construction. MOHO Mobile home, renovation, repair, or addition of accessory structure not yielding a new living unit. MOHON Mobile home, pre-fabricated house, or trailer installed (plumbed, wired) in a mobile home park (see distinction from single-family residence, below). RAD Residential addition/alteration, creating no new dwelling unit(s). RREISSUE Residential permit re-issue. RREPAIR Residential building repair. Damage, fire, etc. RREPLACE Residential building replacement (no additional units). SFA Single-family, attached - new construction. A one-family house attached to one or more other houses, with one or more common walls extending from foundation to roof at, or forming, a lot line. Has own plumbing and heating system (e.g.: townhouse, row house, half-plex) SFD Single-family, detached - w construction: A one-family house with open area on all four sides. May have an attached or detached garage, or a business. May be a detached 'granny flat'. May be a mobile home or trailer on an individual lot, but not in a mobile home park. Non-Residential/Accessory Permits Code Description COM Commercial structure, new construction. CREISSUE Commercial permit re-issue. CREPAIR Commercial building - repair. Damage, fire, etc. CREPLACE Commercial building - replacement. CT! Commercial tenant improvement. DEMO Demolition permit. ELEC Electrical permit, for electrical work only. HOTEL Hotel or motel (including Managed Living Unit hotel) - new construction. HOTELR Hotel renovation. INDUST Industrial structure, new construction. IT! Industrial tenant improvement. MECH Mechanical permit, for mechanical work only. MISC Miscellaneous. Use only if proposed work doesn't fit another activity type. PATIO Patio and/or deck. PLUM Plumbing permit, for plumbing work only. POOL Gunite pools and spas. RETAIN Retaining wall permit. SIGN Sign construction/installation permit. - SOLAR Solar energy system installation permit (specify structure type to be served). SPA Factory-made or Gunite. List 2. Structure-Type (Use with Residential Permit Only) From the following list, determine the type of residential structure that best describes the structure on which you will be working. Please put the code of that structure-type in the appropriate blank at the top of the page on the front of this application. Code Description SFA Single-family, attached. A one-family house attached to one or more other houses, with one or more common walls extending from foundation to roof at, or forming, a lot line. Has own plumbing and heating system (e.g.: townhouse, row house, half-plex). SFD Single-family detached: A one-family house with open area on all four sides. May have an attached or detached garage, or a business. May be a detached 'granny flat'. May be a mobile home or trailer on an individual lot, but not in a mobile home park. MF2-4 Multi-family, 2 to 4 units. A residential structure on a single lot, containing two, three, or four dwelling units Units may share master heating, plumbing, or electrical service (e.g.: duplex, triplex, quad-plex). MF5+ Multi-family, 5 or more units. Same as MF24, except the building has a t least five attached units on the same lot. MOHO Mobile home, pre-fabricated house, or trailer installed (plumbed, wired) in a mobile home park (see distinction from single-family residence, above) Date 02/22/2006 02/22/2006 12/14/2005 12/06/2005 12/06/2005 12/06/2005 12/02/2005 10/20/2005 10/17/2005 10/17/2005 10/17/2005 10/17/2005 Description 19 Final Structural 39 Final Electrical 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 22 Sewer/Water Service 23 Gas/Test/Repairs 17 Interior Lath/Drywall 16 Insulation 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding 22 Sewer/Water Service 39 Final Electrical 84 Rough Combo City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request For: 06/02/2006 Permit# CB042599 Title: RODRIGUEZ RES-ADD 868 SF & Description: REMODEL 930 SF Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: 2452 TUTTLE ST Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT RODRIGUEZ MARIO&PATRICE Owner: RODRIGUEZ MARIO&PATRICE Inspector Assignment: PC Phone: 7608058157 Inspector:•___________ Total Time: Requested By: MARIO Entered By: CHRISTINE CD Description Act Comment 19 Final Structural 29 Final Plumbing 39 Final Electrical 49 Final Mechanical Comments/Notices/Hold Associated PCRs/CVs Original PC# Inspection History Act lnsp Comments NR PC AP PC AP PC WC PC ALREADY APPR AP PC CO PC TEST FAILED AP PC. AP PC AP PC CO PC not installed PA PC change out Ok emr CO PC 1)drainage pipe not completed must add pipe and cleanout. 2) gas pipe has union in ceiling space City of Carlsbad Bldg Inspection Request LWNO For: 10/17/2005 Permit# CB042599 Inspector Assignment: PC Title: RODRIGUEZ RES-ADD 868 SF & Description: REMODEL 930 SF Type: RESDNTL Sub Type: RAD Job Address: 2452 TUTTLE ST Suite: Lot 0 Location: APPLICANT RODRIGUEZ MARIO&PATRICE Owner: RODRIGUEZ MARIO&PATRICE Remarks: Total Time: CD Description 0s4l 7 Phone: V tt(i7 Inspector: 0/ 0 LA;~7 rl-c-OM Requested By: MARIO Entered By: JAN EAN 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding W 19 22 Sewer!Water Service C.40 - '1 WS1rtkt7'Q 39 Final Electrical i3%- Caft eL=OLrr MI - )E J r t4OT VLbU Associated PCRs/CVs Cj 7y2 tl(Ot N clawaj Inspection History Date Description Act Insp Comments 10/12/2005 84 Rough Combo CO PC 1) draft stop © ac chase 2) top out test 3) OK to insulate 09/22/2005 18 Exterior Lath/Drywall AP TP 08/23/2005 13 Shear Panels/HD's WC PC ALL READY INSPECTED ON 8-22-05 08/23/2005 15 Roof/Reroof WC PC 08/22/2005 13 Shear Panels/HD's AP PC 08/22/2005 15 Roof/Reroof AP PC 07/28/2005 14 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding PA PC FLOOR NAILING 07/22/2005 11 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PC 07/22/2005 21 Underground/Under Floor AP PC 07/22/2005 31 Underground/Conduit-Wiring AP PC EsGil Corporation In (Partners/lip wit/i government for Bui&ing Safety DATE: 01/04/05 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad o AEPCANT JURI U EVIEWER U FILE PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-2599 SET: II PROJECT ADDRESS: 2452 Tuttle Street PROJECT NAME: Addition/ Decks/ Remodel for Rodriguez Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. Z The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the. applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Kessner Construction 4028 Vista Calaveras Street Oceanside, Ca. 92056 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Greg Kessner Telephone #: (760) 427-7956 bate contacted: I/L( /OS(by:k Fax #: (760) 454-0303 Mail '.-fephone Fax" In Person LII REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Esgil Corporation El GA [:1 M13 9EJ El PC Enclosures: 12/23/04 tmsmtLdot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax(858)560-1576 #lsbad 04-2599 01/04/05 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2452 Tuttle Street DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/23/04 REVIEWED BY: Ray Fuller PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-2599 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 01/04/05 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new complete sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes ONo a .1 Ca?lsbad 04-2599 01/04/05 The items listed below are from the previous list. These remaining items have not been adequately addressed. The remarks in bold are to emphasize the remaining problem. 1. Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two, sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602-2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. 2. Final sets of plans and any new calculations to be stamped and signed by engineer of record also. No energy calculations provided. Could not determine why plans note total sq footage to be 1798 and energy calculations are for 1878 sq ft. Please clarify. No truss calculations provided. Still seems to apply. 16. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (required by the soil report). Not provided. Verify existing 12'x12'z footings Ok. 19. Show foundation bolt size and spacing. Foundation bolt size and spacing for shear walls must be clearly shown on the foundation plan. Section 1806.6. Specify on the plans how all windows are to open. Provide exhaust fans to bathrooms where minimum 1.5 sq ft of openable is not provided. Added exhaust fans where noted in pencil. Recheck plans for tempered window locations i.e. within 2 ft of interior/exterior doors, shower/tub areas and within 5 ft of stairwell i.e. 6040 and 3040. Still seems to apply. 29. Show or note that doors may open to the exterior only if the exterior landing is not than more than one inch lower than the door threshold. Section 1003.3.1.6 Could not locate note on A4.1? 4 Carlsbad 04-2599 01/04/05 No door show to water heater. Minimum 2 ft door required and specify the size of high and low combustion air vents. Could not locate high and low combustion air vents. Could not locate where type of roof framing was noted at lower roof area and ceiling joist type and spacing. No structural details provided for small deck. Floor plan to reflect how slope is obtain and reflect cantilever. Exposed micro lams to be finished at underneath as can not be exposed to the weather. Specify how obtaining the required minimum 1h inch per foot deck slope for drainage i.e. ripping, sleepers, slope framing etc. If ripping, note maximum taper cut and calculations to reflect this and if sleepers detail attachment to floor joist. Calculations to verify ripped 2 x 12's adequate Detail K is noting a drop and then ripped. If this is the case then 2 x 12's spanning 14 ft would be around 6-7" in depth depending on notch to be specified. The plans/calculations need to clear reflect max notch, 1/4 11 per foot and minimum amount to remain at end. How will R-30 be obtained at this area as generally requires 9 1/2 depth? 39. Provide stairway and landing details Verily the following is reflected on the plans where applicable. Sections 1003.3.3. Could not locate. Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. Minimum headroom is 6'-8". Could not locate. Detail and reference any ledger attachments of landings. The plans are reflecting post for support with no spread footings shown below? 47. Specify type of TJl's. TJI 250s' no longer made. Verify 230's ok or change to 360's? 52. When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form before pulling permit 54. If hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. Could not locate this note. 60. Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 708.2.1: See detail L where fire block required at ledger line and could not determine where detail K applies? Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. Not provided. Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others (i.e., a "review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). Section 106.3.4.1. Not provided. Carlsbad 04-2599 01/04/05 To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes E3 No U The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. - I Carlsbad 04-2599 01/04/05 SPECIAL INSPECTION PROGRAM -. ADDRESS OR LEGArDESCRIPTION: z %'Z 7k7TtF 5JAf 1! 4C/# PLAN CHECK NUMBER: OWNER'S NAME: £oD,f /h4E P4/U" I, as the Owner, or agent of the owner (contractors may not employ the special inspector), certify that I, or the archltéctlenglneer.of record, will be responsible for employing the special Inspector(s) as required by Uniform Building Code (U BC) Se6tlon'1701 .1 for the construction project located at the site listed above. UBC Secti n 106.3.5. /- os-,vet. Signed I, as the en eer/architect of record, certify tha ye pro are the following special inspection program as required by UBC Section 106.3.5 for the construction project locat d at e site listed above. Signed Seal Engineer!s!Archltects /7V 1. List of work requiring special Inspection: g 61' bi4/ifrl. Soils Compliance Prior to Foundation Inspection 0 Field Welding Structural Concrete Over 2500 Psi 0 High Strength Bolting O Prestressed Concrete g Expansion/Epoxy Anchors -#SP 5./P1(. O Structural Masonry 0 Sprayed-On Fireproofing Designer Specified - '77UU7L1'f1- 0 Other ,' teS/t'4' &.,rn-Lt 2. Name(s) of individual(s) or firm(s) responsible for the special Inspections listed above: U,iff 3. Duties of the special Inspectors for the work listed above: S'& /b?z 600 X' Special Inspectors shall check In with the City and present their credentials for approval orlor to beginning work on the Job site. Anchoring Systems 4.3.5 HIT C-100 4.3.5.4 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS Screw on mixer. For deeper holes, attach filler tube. 1. Set the drill depth gauge and hammer drill the hole to the required hole depth. IMPORTANT: Clear out dust and fragments; preferably using ajet of water or compressed air and a wire brush. The hole may be damp, but the standing water should be blown out. Cut open small car- tridge with a saw or util- ity knife. The large car- tridge is self opening. IMPORTAN1 Rods should not be loaded before cure time Is complete. See Gel lime/Cure lime Table. install the adhesive car- ..1109 in the dispenser. I Dispense adhesive Into hole about 1/2 full. NOTE: The first? of resin which flows out of the mixer tube of a new cartridge should be discaided. Insert slowly, turning the threaded rod, rebar or dowel rod. HIT C-100 Volume Charts Threaded Rod Installation Rebar Installation Rod Diameter In. (mm) Bit Diameter In. Adhesive Volume Required per Inch of embedment 1/4 ( 6.4) .055 ( 9.5) .095 '/2 (12.7) /e (15.9) 'Via .104 ia/to .281 7/a (22.2) 'Via (24). .272 1 (25.4) 11/10 .318 11/4 (31.8) 16/18 .497 EXAMPLE: Determine approximate fastenings for rod embedded 10" deep. 10 0.184 =1.84 ln'volume of adhesive per anchor 11.6+1.84 6 fastenings per small cartridge Rod Diameter In. (mm) Drill DII * Diameter In. Approximate Adhesive Volume Required per Inch of embedment (I0) #30r 3Ia(9.5) 1/2 .105 #40r1/2 (12.7) 8/ .131 05or54 (15.9) 2/4 .178 #80r'./4(19.1) '/a .218 07o,/a(22.2) 1 .236 08or1(25.4) V/a .284 #9Ot1'/a(31.8) 1°/te .466 #10 or 1'/4(31.8) 11/0 .433 NOTE Useable volume of HIT small cartridge is 11.6 in3 Useable volume of HIT large cartridge is 41.9 In' Rebar diameter may vary. Use smallest drill bit which will accommodate rebar, In no event more than 1/8" bigger than the actual rebar. I Product Technical Guide 9195 EsGil Corporation In Partners/lip wit/i government for(Building Safety DATE: 07/14/04 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-2599 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2452 Tuttle Street SET:I O APPLICANT EVIEWER O FILE PROJECT NAME: Addition/ Decks/ Remodel for Rodriguez Residence The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. LI The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Kessner Construction 4028 Vista Calaveras Street Oceanside, Ca. 92056 LI Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan. check has been completed. Person contacted: Greg Kessner Telephone #: (760) 427-7956 Date contacted:ln/M (by: Co ) Fax #: (760) 454-0303. Mail Telephone Fax -1n Person [11 REMARKS: By: Ray Fuller Enclosures: Esgil Corporation E] GA 0MB DEJ El PC 07/06/04 tmsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive', Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (858) 560-1468 • Fax (858) 560-1576 V •. Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14/04 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-2599 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2452 Tuttle Street FLOOR AREA: STORIES: 2 Addition 868 Decks 142 HEIGHT: 18 ft per UBC DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 06/30/04 ESGIL CORPORATION: 07/06/04 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW PLAN REVIEWER: Ray Fuller COMPLETED: 07/14/04 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with the 2001 edition of the California Building Code (Title 24), which adopts the following model codes: 1997 UBC, 2000 UPC, 2000 UMC and 1999 NEC (all effective 11/1/02). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1997 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet number, specification section, etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14/04 Please make all corrections on the original tracings, as requested in the correction list. Submit three sets of plans for commercial/industrial projects (two sets of plans for residential projects). For expeditious processing, corrected sets can be submitted in one of two ways: Deliver all corrected sets. of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department, 1635 Faraday Ave., Carlsbad, CA 92009, (760) 602- 2700. The City will route the plans to EsGil Corporation and the Carlsbad Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. Bring one corrected set of plans and calculations/reports to EsGil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, CA 92123,'(858) 560-1468. Deliver all remaining sets of plans and calculations/reports directly to the City of Carlsbad Building Department for routing to their Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments. NOTE: Plans that are submitted directly to EsGil Corporation only will not be reviewed by the City Planning, Engineering and Fire Departments until review by EsGil Corporation is complete. Generally the Plans are incomplete and a thorough Plan Check can not be done. The following list is a general list only and corrections may follow when the clarity of plans and work to be performed are clearly reflected. Cover sheet to include the sq footages of the decks. No energy calculations provided. No truss calculations provided or conventional roof framing sizes shown. No floor and roof framing plan provided. No details provided for the stairwell opening. No shear schedule, shear transfer provided. No interior footings shown for bearing walls and braced wall panels. Per City policy this project requires a soils report. The plans do not fall within conventional framing parameters and design calculations are required: The Conventional Light-Frame Construction provisions of Section 2320 may not be used in Seismic Zones 3 & 4 for "unusually shaped buildings," and thus design calculations must be provided, as per Section 2320.5. i) When exterior braced wall panels are not in one plane vertically from the foundation to the uppermost story. See kitchen where removing bearing wall. Max distance without interior braced walls on each story in each direction at both interior and exterior is 25 ft. Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14/04 11. Provide a copy of the project soil report prepared by a California licensed architect or civil engineer. The report shall include foundation design recommendations based on the engineer's findings and shall comply with UBC Section 1804. 12. In Seismic Zone 4, each site shall be assigned a near-source factor. Identify this value in the soils report and on the plans. Section 1629.4.2. 13. Investigate the potential for seismically induced soil liquefaction and soil instability in Seismic Zones 3 and 4. Section 1804.5 14. Note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 106.3.3. 15. If applies: The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was.prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 16. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). 17. The following are some of the parameters required in order to meet conventional framing. Show the following on the plans for the required braced wall panels. If the requirements of braced wall panels in conventional light frame construction are not possible, provide design calculations from a licensed Engineer or Architect. a) Show on the plans the location, length and type of braced wall panel as per UBC Section 2320.11.3 and Table 23-IV-C-1. I) Braced wall panels shall start at not more than 8' from each end of a braced wall line. Braced wall lines shall be in line or offset from each other by not more than 4 feet. Braced wall panels in one story structures shall be installed at each end and not more than 25' on center along the length of the braced wall line. For Conventional Light-Frame Construction, buildings shall be provided with exterior and interior braced wall lines. Spacing shall not exceed 25' on center in both directions for each story. b) Interior braced wall panels shall be detailed and referenced extending to the floor/roof sheathing. :_-. •-,• - - - - Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14/04 c) All panels to specify type, length and reference a shear transfer detail i.e. edge nailing of roof sheathing to top plates/framing below. d) Any braced wall panel required by Section 2320.11.3 may be replaced by an alternate braced wall panel. UBC Section 2320.11.4. For alternate braced wail panels in one story buildings, show compliance with the following on the plans: Minimum braced panel length is 2'-8" in width and a maximum height of 10'-0". Each braced wall panel is sheathed on at least one face with 3/8" plywood sheathing nailed with 8d common or-galvanized box nails per 23-11-B-I and blocked at all plywood edges. A minimum of two anchor bolts installed in accordance with 5ect10n1806.6 between hold down devices. An approved hold down device fastened to the foundation and capable of providing an uplift capacity of not less than 1,800 pounds is provided at each panel end. The foundation that supports the braced panels is continuous across the entire length of the braced wall line and reinforced with a minimum of one #4 bar top and bottom. e) In the first story of a two story building, each alternate braced wail panel shall be as described above except that the plywood sheathing shall be provided on both faces, three anchor bolts are to be installed, and hold down devices at panel ends with uplift capacity of not less that 3,000 pounds provided. f) Detail and reference all shear locations with a detail showing shear extending to floor/roof sheathing. Detail to include edge nailing of roof diaphragm to members below. Minimum 2 details required i.e. when shear walls are perpendicular to roof framing/trusses (blocking panels) and when shear walls are parallel to roof framing members. g) Continuous footings shall be provided under interior braced wall lines. See Section 2320.5.6 for possible exceptions. Plans to reflect size of existing footings and verify capable of supporting additional floor loads. Detail A/A-2 to specify anchor bolt spacing for shear walls. The plans as drawn are not to scale. See 36 ft dimension. Dimension on the plans 30" clear width for water closet compartments and 24" clearance in front of water closet. Section 2904. See master bath for example where generally requires a minimum of 4 Y2 to 5 ft to allow for minimum 24" clearance in front. Specify on the plans how all windows are to open. Provide exhaust fans to bathrooms where minimum 1.5 sq ft of openable is not provided. I . . . ,-... ... . . . . Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14/04 Recheck plans for tempered window locations i.e. within 2 ft of interior/exterior doors, shower/tub areas and within 5 ft of stairwell i.e. 6040 and 3040. Could not locate smoke detector for the 1st floor. Specify use of all rooms at the 1st floor. Headers appear to be undersized where supporting floor, wall and roof loads. Is existing electrical panel location unaffected by proposed addition(s) and is it adequate for the additional sq footage proposing? Is existing heating and/or cooling appliances affected by proposed addition(s) and are they adequate for the additional sq footage proposing? Show or note that doors may open to the exterior only if the exterior landing is not than more than one inch lower than the door threshold. Section 1003.3.1.6 No door show to water heater. Minimum 2 ft door required and specify the size of high and low combustion air vents. Show I and P valve on water heater and show route of discharge line to exterior. UPC, Section 608.5. In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. Provide two straps (one strap at top 1/3 of the tank and one strap at bottom 1/3 of the tank). UPC, Section 510.5 Foundation plan to reference applicable detail and roof framing plan to address this. Specify type of water proof deck material proposing. No structural details provided for small deck. Specify how obtaining the required minimum ¼ inch per foot deck slope for drainage i.e. ripping, sleepers, slope framing etc. If ripping, note maximum taper cut and calculations to reflect this and if sleepers detail attachment to floor joist. Handrails (Section 1003.3.3.6): Handrails and extensions shall be 34" to 38" above nosing of treads and be continuous. The handgrip portion of all handrails shall be not less than 1-1/4 inches nor more than 2 inches in cross-sectional dimension. Handrails projecting from walls shall have at least 1-1/2 inches between the wall and the handrail. Ends of handrails shall be returned or shall have rounded terminations or bends. . . .. Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14/04 37. Guardrails (Section 509.1): Shall have a height of 36". Shall be detailed showing adequacy of connections to resist the horizontal force prescribed in Table 16-13. Openings between railings shall be less than 4". The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom element of a guardrail at a stair shall be less than 6". 38. Provide structural details to include stringer size, spacing and how stringers are supported at the top and bottom of runs. 39. Provide stairway and landing details Verfiy the following is reflected on the plans where applicable. Sections 1003.3.3. Maximum rise is 7" and minimum run is 11". When the stairs serves less than 10 occupants, or serves an unoccupied roof, rise may be 8" maximum and run 9" minimum. Minimum headroom is 6'-8". Minimum width is 36". Detail and reference any ledger attachments of landings. Every stairway landing shall have a dimension, measured in the direction of travel, at least equal to the stairway width. If a door occurs at the landing, such dimension need not exceed 36 inches. Sections 1003.3.3.5 and 1003.3.1.7. The walls and soffits of the enclosed usable space under interior stairs shall be protected on the enclosed side as required for one hour fire-resistive construction. Section 1003.3.3.9. 40. Show the required ventilation for attics. The minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. Section 1505.3. 41. Specify slope of roofs and -type roofing material proposing. 42. Specify on the plans the following information for the roof materials, per Section 106.3.3: Manufacturer's name. Product name/number. ICBO approval number, or equal. 43. Missing beam/post size for the covered balcony. 44. Detail and reference how beams will be supported where they intersect over post(s) i.e. ECCLL's? Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14104 Detail all post-to-beam and post-to-footing connections and reference the detail to the plan. If using built up columns then note minimum anchor bolts per panel and show any lateral bracing i.e. if sheared. Any post located on concrete slabs shall be supported so as to project a minimum of 1" above and any isolated piers shall project at least 8 inches above ground level unless the posts are of approved wood of natural resistance to decay or treated wood is used Specify width of hallway to be 3 ft clear and provide landing details. Specify type of TJl's. Provide calculations for balloon framed walls at stairwell. Specify stud size and spacing. Minimum 2 x6 if using R-19 per Section on A3.1. Detail and reference 5/8" retro fit anchor bolts required to be added for new shear walls at existing foundation. If using redheads, then note size, type and length. If epoxied then note size of all thread, depth of embedment and epoxy type and lCBO/NER number. Any shear panel lengths less than 4 ft will require retro fit hold downs. Specify type of hold down and all thread size, length and depth of embedment. This will require special inspection to be noted at detail and cover sheet of plans. If required by the soils report and structural calculations then on the cover sheet of the plans, specify any items requiring special inspection, in a format similar to that shown below. Section 106.3.2. REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS In addition to the regular inspections, the following checked items will also require Special Inspection in accordance with Sec. 1701 of the Uniform Building Code. ITEM REQUIRED? REMARKS SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSPECTION EXPANSION/EPDXY ANCHORS When special inspection is required, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program which shall be submitted to the building official for approval prior to issuance of the building permit. Please review Section 106.3.5. Please complete the attached form. If required, show size, embedment and location of hold down anchors on foundation plan. Section 106.3.3. If hold downs are required, note on plan that hold down anchors must be tied in place prior to foundation inspection. Section 108.5.2. .1. •. . - . . ... . - . . . .. - ... . . . Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14/04 55. Show adequate footings under all bearing walls and shear walls. Section 1806.3. 56. Note cross bridging or blocking. Floor joists and rafters 12" or more in depth shall be supported laterally by bridging at intervals not exceeding 8 feet, unless both edges are held inline. Sec. 2306.7. 57. Show blocking at ends and at supports of floor joists, rafters and trusses at exterior walls. Section 2320.8.3. 58. Show double top plate with minimum 48" lap splice. Section 2320.11.2. 59. Show nailing will be in compliance with Table 23-I1-13-I. 60. Show or note fire stops at the following locations per Section 708.2.1: In concealed spaces between stair stringers at the top and bottom of the run and between studs along and inline with the run of stairs if the walls under the stairs are unfinished; In concealed spaces of stud walls and partitions, including furred spaces, at the ceiling and floor levels and at 10 foot intervals both vertical and horizontal; At all interconnections between concealed vertical and horizontal spaces such as occur at soffits, drop ceilings and cove ceilings; 61. Detail all post-to-beam and post-to-footing connections and reference the detail to the plan. Section 2314. 62. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. 63. Please provide evidence that the engineer-of-record (or architect) has reviewed the truss calculation package prepared by others (i.e., a "review" stamp on the truss calculations or a letter). Section 106.3.4.1. 64. Provide roof framing plan and floor framing plan. Section 106.3.3. 65. Specify all header sizes. Section 2320.11.6. 66. Residential exterior balconies (cantilevered from the main structure) must be designed for a live load of 60 psf; residential decks (supported on opposing sides) may be designed fora live load of 40 psf. 67. Provide calculations for main vertical and horizontal framing members and footings. Section 106.33. 68. Provide calculations for lateral loads, shear panels, shear transfer and related. Section 106.3.3. Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14/04 Please show in the calculations how the redundancy was determined, per Section 1630.1.1. If the Simplified method is used to determine seismic loads, please show compliance with Section 1629.8.2 and 1630.2.3: a) When soil properties are not known in detail, Type SE shall be used in Equation 30-11 for Seismic Zones 1, 2A and 2B; otherwise Type SD shall be used. Specify size, I.C.B.O. number and manufacturer of power driven pins, expansion anchors or epoxy anchors. Show edge and end distances and spacing. Section 106.3.3. Show on the plans all structural requirements developed in the structural calculations. Section 106.3.3. Plans need to be reviewed by designer of record, stamp and signed showing that details and floor plans match calculations which in turn show a complete vertical and lateral load path to the foundation. Detail shear transfer connections, including roof and floor diaphragms, to shear walls. Section 2315. Specify nail size and spacing forall shear walls, floor and roof diaphragms. Indicate required blocking. Maintain maximum diaphragm dimension ratios. Sections 2315 and 2513. In Seismic Zones 3 and 4, where allowable shear values exceed 350 plf in wood structural panel shear walls, foundation sill plates and all framing members receiving edge nailing from abutting panels shall not be less than a single 3" nominal member. In shear walls where the total wall design shear does not exceed 600 plf, a single 2" nominal sill plate may be used, provided the anchor bolts are designed for a load capacity of 50% or less of the allowable capacity. Plywood joint and sill plate nailing shall be staggered in all cases. Table 23-I1-I- 1, footnote 3. Show location of attic access with a minimum size of 22"x30", unless the maximum vertical headroom height in the attic is less than 30". Access must be provided to each separated attic area, shall be located in a hallway or other readily accessible location and 30" headroom clearance is required above the opening. Section 1505.1. Specify plywood and/or particle board thickness, grade and panel span rating. Table 23-I1-E-1. Ridges, hips, and valleys shall be at least one size larger than supported rafters. Section 2320.12.3. Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14/04 Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. Detail and reference ledger attachment of deck -roof rafter to wall to include type member attaching to and size, length and spacing of lags for example. Plans to reflect size of bolts, length of embedment and type termination i.e. 12 dia L or 4 dia J bolt, hex head size/washer for hold downs or note on the plans the appropriate SSTB sizes for each type of hold down i.e. SSTB sizes i.e. SSTB 16's for any HD2A's, SSTB 20's for 5A's etc. Plans to reflect size of member attaching hold downs to i.e. 4 x posts etc. Plans to note if beams are to be dropped or flush. If dropped then note minimum 7' head clearance and show required straps if held flush to top plates. If beams are flush then calculations and plans to reflect any required taper cuts. Show the location, type and size (BTU's) of all heating and cooling appliances or systems. Show minimum 30" deep unobstructed working space in front of furnace. UMC Section 903. Show source of combustion air to furnace, per Chapter 7, UMC. Specify the location and sizes of both of the combustion air openings. If applies: Note on the plans that the FAU closet or alcove must be 12 inches wider than the furnace or furnaces being installed. UMC Section 904.1. If applies: A fuel burning furnace shall not be installed in a room used or designed to be used as a bedroom, bathroom, closet, or in any enclosed space with access only through such room or space. UMC Section 904.5 Show an access opening to the equipment in attics to large enough to remove the largest piece of equipment by not less that 30" x 22". UMC Section 908. Note that passageway to the mechanical equipment in the attic shall be unobstructed and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic. UMC Section 908.0. Show a permanent electrical receptacle outlet and lighting fixture controlled by a switch located at the entrance for furnaces located in an attic or underfloor space. UMC Sections 908.0 & 909.0. Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14104 . CITY OF CARLSBAD REQUIREMENTS All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. An update letter is required if the report is more than 3 years old. If a room addition is less than 1000 sq. ft. in area and only one story, then a soils report is not required. Nails for shear transfer connection (using A35's, etc.) may not be driven parallel to the flanges of TJI's (i.e., along the sides), per city policy, unless specific written approval from Trus-Joist Macmillan is first obtained. Details or notes on the plans should make this clear. Nails may be driven perpendicular to TJI flanges. To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that-are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: Yes 0 No L3 The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 858/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact Ray Fuller at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 04-2599 07/14/04 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 04-2599 PREPARED BY: Ray Fuller DATE: 07/14/04 BUILDING ADDRESS: 2452 Tuttle Street BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R3 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VN BUILDING PORTION AREA (Sq. Ft.) Valuation Miltiplier Reg. IVbd. VALUE ($) Addition 868 Per City Est. 185,194 Decks 142 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers i TOTALVALUE 185,194 Jurisdiction Code ICB JBy Ordinance IBldg. _!!! Fee P Ordinance] Plan Check Fee by Ordinance Type of Review: J Complete Review fl Structural Only r. Repetitive Fee r Other I j Repeats r Hourly I jHour * - Esgll Plan Review Fee r F F Comments: I $811.441 I $527.441 I $454411 Sheet I of I macvatue.doc BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST oe DATE: BUILDING D ESS: PROJECT DESCRIPTION,: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: PLANCHECKNO.: CBOYt5' 01 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT APPROVAL DENIAL The item you have submitted for review has been I Please se d\ the - attached report of deficiencies approved. The approval is based on plans, I marked with 'iMake necessary corrections to plans information and/or specifications provided in your I or atio for compliance with applicéble submittal; therefore any changes to these items after I codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or this date, including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued specifications to-this-office for review. - conformance with applicable codes. Please review I carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with instructions in this report can result in I \ç7 suspension of permit to build. V A Right-of-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Date: Date: (OY - Date: - - _,UUNLY ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE BUILDING PERMIT: :By: <"C\ Date ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Dedication Application Dedication Checklist - Improvement Application Improvement Checklist Future Improvement Agreement Grading Permit Application Grading Submittal Checklist Right-of-Way Permit Application Right-of-Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Sheet Sewer Fee Information Sheet Name: JOANNE VJUCHNIEWICZ City of Carlsbad Address: 1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Phone: (760) 602-2775 CFD INFORMATION Parcel Map No: Lots: Recordation: Carlsbad Tract: A-4 H:W0RDD0CSCHKISflBul1dlng PlanthedcCMst Form (Generlc).doc I Rev. 7114100 4. BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST ee + 11. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: 30 e-t- North Arrow jgPr!-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets Existing & Proposed Structures ,gbriveway widths , . 06 ,'Orl Existing Street Improvements H. Existing or proposed sewer lateral Property Lines I. Existing or proposed water service Easements . J. Existing or proposed irrigation service 2. Show on site plan: 3 Drainage Patterns• 1. Building pad surface drainage must maintain a minimum slope of one percent towards an adjoining street or an approved drainage course. 2. ADD THE FOLLOWING NOTE: "Finish grade willprovide a minimum positive drainage of 2% to swale 5' away from building." Existing & Proposed Slopes and Topography Size, type, location, alignment of existing or proposed sewer and water service (s) that serves the project. Each unit requires a separate service, however, second dwelling units and apartment complexes are an exception. Sewer and water laterals should not be located within proposed driveways, per standards.. 3. Include on title sheet: A: Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/industrial buildings and tenant improvement projects, include: total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. EXISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION W0RDD0C5CH8II Planthed, CIit Porn, (Geneitc).doc 2 . Rev. 7114100 F BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND. 3 rd DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE El El 4a. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for ProjectNo._______________________________________________ 0 0 El 4b. All conditions are in compliance. Date: DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS 1i 0 0 5. Dedication for all street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm N' drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and -for remodels with a value at or exceeding $15.000, pursuant to. Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 8 1/2fl x 11" plat map and submit with a title report. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior to issuance of Building Permit. Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Submit the completed application form with the required checklist items and fees to the- Engineering Department in person. Applications will not be accept by mail or fax. Dedication completed by: Date: IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS El El El 6a. All needed public improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever, the value of the construction exceeds .$75.000, pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvement requirements. A registered Civil Engineer must prepare the appropriate improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist to the Engineering Department through a separate plan check process. The completed application form and the requirements on the H:WORDDOCSCHKLSflBuIIding PIan,edc Cldst Foim (RIDDLE. HARVEY 7.12.00)4oc 3 . Rev. I2I2W96 . 1S1 2'" LA J~O V r4p.~k.- r~ fer t CHECKLIST checklist must be submitted in person. Applications by mail or fax are not accepted. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and -fees paid prior-to issuance of building permit. Improvement Plans signed by: Date: Construction of the public improvements may be deferred pursuant to' Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 18.40. Please submit a recent propefl, title report or current grant deed Qp3ft r9ptydprocessing fee of $3 so we may DetFiiecessary wtW1MprovehiéñtAqreement. This. reerneiif5ë Future lic improvements required as follows: 0 0 0 6c. Enclosed please find. your Future Improvement Agreement. Please return agreement signed and notarized to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: Date: U 0 0 6d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective, improvements found adiacent to building site must be repaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occupancy. . . GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ' The conditions that invoke the need for, a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. El El El 7a. Inadequate information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading , requirements. Include accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). O El 0 7b. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Grading Inspector sign off by: Date: 7c. Graded Pad Certification required. (Note: Pad certification may be required even if a grading permit is not required.) HWORD'oOcSCHKLS1BUildiflg Plancheck We Fonn (Genetic 7-I4-00).dcc 4 Rev. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST ND 3RD fl 7d .No Grading Permit required. L:J 7e. If grading is not required, write "No Grading" on plot plan. MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS jJtV' j fl 8. A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or r private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, tree trimming, driveway construction, tying into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. Right-of-Way permit required for: 0 9. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT If your facility is located in the City of Carlsbad sewer service area, you need to contact the Carlsbad Municipal Water District, located at 5950 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, CA 92008. District personnel can provide forms and assistance, and will check to see if your business enterprise is on the EWA Exempt List. You may telephone (760) 438-2722, extension 7153, for assistance. Industrial Waste permit accepted by: Date: tfr 0 0 10. NPDES PERMIT Complies • with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first. 11. No edfeesareattached fees required WATER METER REVIEW 0 fl 12a. Domestic (potable) Use • • Ensure that the meter proposed by the owner/developer is not oversized. Oversized meters are inaccurate during low-flow conditions. If it is oversized, for the life of the meter, the City will not accurately bill the owner for the water used. . All single family dwelling units received "standard" 1" service with 5/8" service. H:W0R0DOCHKLS78uIdh1O Plandiedc Ctdst Form (Genedcdoc 5 Rev. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD If owner/developer proposes a size other than the "standard", then owner/developer must provide potable water demand calculations, which include total fixture counts and maximum water demand in gallons per minute (gpm). A typical fixture count and water demand worksheet is attached. Once the gpm is provided, check against the "meter sizing schedule" to verify the anticipated meter size for the unit. Maximum service and meter size is a 2" service wIth a 2" meter. If a developer is proposing a meter greater than 2", suggest the installation of multiple 2" services as needed to provide the anticipated demand. (manifolds are considered on case by case basis to limit multiple trenching into the street). 0 0 12b. Irrigation Use (where recycled water is not available) J All irrigation meters must be sized via irrigation calculations (in gpm) prior to approval. The developer must provide these calculations. Please follow these guidelines: If the project is a newer development (newer than 1998), check the recent improvement plans and observe if the new irrigation service is reflected on the improvement sheets: If so, at the water meter station, the demand in gpm may be listed there. Irrigation services are listed with a circled "I", and potable water is typically a circled "W". The irrigation service should look like: _i STA 1+00 Install 2" service and 1.5: meter (estimated 100 gpm) If the improvement plans do not list the irrigation meter and the service/meter will be installed via another instrument such as the building plans or grading plans (w/ a right of way permit of course), then the applicant must provide irrigation calculations for estimated worst-case irrigation demand (largest zone with the farthest. reach). Typically, Larry Black has already reviewed this if landscape plans have been prepared, but the applicant must provide the calculations to you for your use. Once you have received a good example of irrigation calculations, keep a set for your reference. In general the calculations will include: Hydraulic grade line Elevation at point of connection (POC) Pressure at POC in pounds per square inch (PSI) Worse case zone (largest, farthest away from valve Total Sprinkler heads listed (with gpm use per head) Include a 10% residual pressure at point of connection 3. In general, all major sloped areas of a subdivision/project are to be irrigated via separate irrigation meters (unless the project is only SFD with no HOA). As long as the project is located within the City recycled water H:WORDWOCScHKLSTBuIIdIng Planthedi Cidat Form (Genedc)400 6 Rev. 7114100 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1ST 2ND 3RD service boundary, the City intends on switching these irrigation services/meters to a new recycled water line in the future. 0 12c. Irrigation Use (where recycled water-is available) Recycled water meters are sized the same as the irrigation meter above. If a project fronts a street with recycled water, then they should be connecting to this line to irrigate slopes within the development. For subdivisions, this should have been identified, and implemented on the improvement plans. Installing recycled water meters is a benefit for the applicant since they are exempt from paying the San Diego County Water Capacity fees. However, if they front a street which the recycled water is there, but is not live (sometimes they are charged with potable water until recycled water is available), then the applicant must pay the San Diego Water Capacity Charge. If within three years, the recycled water line is charged with recycled water by CMWD, then the applicant can apply for a refund to the San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA).for a refund. However, let the applicant know that we cannot guarantee the refund, and they must deal with the SDCWA for this. 0 fl 0 13. Additional Comments: HWORDDOC$CHKLSflBuIIdIng Planthedi Cldst Form (Genedc).drm 7 Rev. 7114100 PLANNING/ENGINEERING APPROVALS PERMIT NUMBER CB DATE ADDRESS 'iR ' ¶lflTL IDENTIM RESIDENTIAL ADDITION MINOR (<$108000.00) TENANT IMPROVEMENT PLAZA CAMINO REAL CARLSBAD COMPANY STORES VILLAGE FAIRE COMPLETE OFFICE BUILDING OTHER PLANNER_________________ DATE ENGINEER. DATE oocslMlgonnslplannjng Engineering APrOVaIS HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY • HYDROGEOLOGY March 29, 2005 Project No. 4766.1 Log No. 8957 Mr. Greg Kessner Kessner Construction 4028 Vista Calaveras Oceanside, California 92056 Subject: GRADING AND FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Proposed Building Additions 2452 Tuttle Street Carlsbad, California References: 1. "Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Building Additions, 2452 Tuttle Street, Carlsbad, California," by Hetherington Engineering, dated October 1, 2004. 2. "Rodriquez Addition, 2452 Tuttle Street, Carlsbad, California," Sheets G.N., S-i through S-3, by Skyline Engineering, August 8, 2004 Dear Mr. Kessner: In accordance with your request, we have reviewed the referenced report and plans. Based on our review, it appears that the plans (References 2) generally conform to the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report (Reference 1). This opportunity to be of service is appreciated. If you should have any questions, please contact our Carlsbad office. Sincerely, Hepfinon En in ,ring, Inc. IFESSli S. /ason Geldert Civil Engineer 63912 (Expires 9/30/06) bate )* PF C 5205 Avenida Encinas, Suite A • Carlsbad, CA 92008-4369. (76 93111 31-0545 32242 Paseo Adelanto, Suite C • San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-361 • (949 -90614;L4q www.hetheringtonengineering.co GEOTBCHMCAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Building Additions 2452 Tuttle Street • Carlsbad, California • •. ••• ..• qfq HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. SOIL & FOUNDATION ENGINEERING • ENGINEERING GEOLOGY. HYDROGEOLOGY October 1, 2004 Project No. 4824.1 Log No. 8639. Mr. Greg Kessner Kessner Construction 4028 Vista Calaveras Oceanside, California 92056 Subject: GEOTECHNECAL INVESTIGATION -Proposed Building Additions 2452 Tuttle Street Carlsbad, California References: Attached Dear Mr. Kessner: In accordance with your request, we have performed a geotechnical investigation at the .subject site. Our work was performed in August and September 2004. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate geologic and soil conditions within the area intended for new construction, and to provide grading and foundation recommendations for the proposed building additions to the existing single-family residence. With the above in mind, our scope of work included the following Research and review of available plans and geologic literature pertinent to the site vicinity (see References). Subsurface exploration consisting of three hand-excavated exploratory test pits for soil sampling and geologic observation. Laboratory testing of samples obtained from the subsurface exploration. Engineering and geologic analysis. Preparation. of this report providing the results of our field and laboratory work, analyses, and our conclusions and recommendations. 5205 Avenida Encinas, Suite A • Carlsbad, CA 92008-4369 • (760) 931-1917 • Fax (760) 931-0545 32242 Paseo Adelanto, Suite C • San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-3610 • (949) 487-9060 • Fax (949) 487-9116 www.hetheringtonengineering.com I H. I I. I.. I I .. I. The subject property is located at 2452 Tuttle Street, Carlsbad, California, (see Location Map, Figure 1). The site consists of a level, rectangular-shaped lot that presently supports a single-family residence with detached garage. The residence is founded on conventional continuous/spread footings with a raised wood floor. The site is bounded on the east by Interstate 5, on the north and south by similarly developed residential properties, and on the west by Tuttle Street. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4824.1 Log No. 8639 October 1, 2004 Page SITE DESCRIPTION PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT We understand that proposed development consists' of a second-story addition over the entire existing residence and two, one-story additions at the rear of the residence. The approximate locations of the proposed building additions are shown on the attached Plot Plan, Figure 2. The second-story addition will be supported by new and existing .:foundations. Both one-story additions will be supported by new conventional continuous/spread footings and will have slab-on-grade floors. Building loads are expected to be typical for this type of relatively light wood-frame construction. We anticipate that the one-story building additions will be constructed at approximate existing site grades; consequently, grading is expected 'to be limited to footing excavations and subgrade preparation for the slab-on-grade floors. SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION I Subsurface conditions were explored by manually excavating three test pits to depths of approximately 3 to. 3-1/2 feet below existing site grades. The approximate locations of I .the test pits are shown on the attached Plot Plan, Figure 2. The subsurface exploration was supervised by a geologist from this office, who visually classified thô soil materials, obtained' bulk samples for laboratory testing and performed I in-place density tests in accordance with ASTM: D 1556 (Sand-Cone Method). The soils were visually classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Soil ' classifications are shown on the attached Logs of Test Pits, Figures 3 and 4. LABORATORY TESTING . 1 ' ' Laboratory testing was performed on samples obtained during the subsurface exploration. Tests performed consisted of the following: I . 'Moisture Content (ASTM: D 2216) I • Sulfate Content (EPA 9038) . HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. I I I I 1 N ç tx MIX vy T _ PACIFIC l b cuu _!RD PLA RL sic sic 1 0 'REAL W 32 FS \' ('S% ' çp9D FICA YPDREL 3 wu ' 4 ATERGREEN" •.% 'I' (I ,' , c -I SITEv sA_LAS_FL0RS I FOREST , ' 4'f\. \ \ .c:iY. S • hA DR 1> \ I cot , 3 '5-. , T1V/' ;;NA2 VISTA .% PA_OR i I KAL(S —'a5 5TRAT lie PD LN L18 03 r.f.1. ' / r KA LH C1RR ANY AM 4" A __ CH CYPRESS_NV , s) 'C. _' IIfSSWOPD CS ZOOR PAW SEE WH3 V 011W IA 'C. ' ?t PL •, em 5 VIA .Y' NI 2 7 VIA CAM 1 ' 1' 4' AS ow 90 II CL IIfCIEPDN 12 VIA UJITA ARLSB4 ' 7/\ 4 -' 'A Vel q1/_ ADAPTED FROM: The Thomas Guide, San Diego County, 2004 Edition I SCALE: 1" - 2000' (1 Grid = 0.5 x 0.5 miles) LOCATION MAP 2452 Tuttle Street HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Carlsbad,California I fin in in fi A I fi fin nfl ii — * n 1f I UtUill=L.l1NI!\L LA)NUL I AIN I _I PROJECT NO.4824.1 _ FIGURE NO. 1 IV.. I • GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I Project No. 4824.1 ' • Log No. 8639 I October 1, 2004 I . Direct Shear (ASTM: D 3080) I . Expansion (ASTM: D 4829) Maximum Dry Density/Optimum Moisture Content (ASTM: D 1557-00) Results of the dry density and moisture content determinations are presented on the Logs of Test Pits, Figures 3 and 4. The remaining laboratory test results are presented on he I Laboratory Test Results, Figure 5. - AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS I SOIL 1 Geologic Setting I The subject site lies within the coastal plain region of northern San Diego County, California. The coastal plain is characterized by numerous regressive marine terraces -of Pleistocene age that have been established above wave-cut platforms of the underlying Eocene bedrock and were formed during glacio-eustatic changes in sea level. The terraces extend from areas of higher, elevation approximately 2-miles east I . of the site and descend generally west-southwest in a "stairstep" fashion down to the present day coastline, with the age of the terraces decreasing from east to west. The site area is contained within the southwest portion of the USGS San Luis Rey 7-1/2 I minute quadrangle. The subject site is underlain by continental terrace deposits that mantle the Pleistocene wave cut terrace surfaces. Structurally, bedding within the terrace 1 . deposits is considered to be massive. I No known or reported deep-seated landsliding is known to exist on the site. No known or reported active or potentially active faults exist within the site. 2. Geologic Units a. Fill/Topsoil - The property is mantled by a relatively thin layer of I .undifferentiated fill/topsoil consisting of damp to moist, medium dense, red V brown silty fine -sand. The fill/topsoil materials are not considered suitable for the support of the proposed improvements. I • V • HETHEPINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. I I 1 . GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4824.1 Log No. 8639 I October 1, 2004 Page 4 I b. Terrace Deposits - Continental terrace. deposits encountered in our exploratory test pits and underlying the fill/topsoil consists generally of dry to moist, dense to very dense, red brown silty fine sand. Groundwater No seepage. or static groundwater was encountered in the exploratory test pits. It should be noted, however, that fluctuations in the amount and level of groundwater might occur due to variations in rainfall, irrigation, and other factors that may not have been evident at the time of our field investigation. - Existing Foundation The existing foundation, as observed in the exploratory test pits, consists of conventional continuous footings. The footings are approximately 12-inches wide and founded. 17 to 22-inches below existing site grades and 6-inches into terrace deposits. SEISMICITY. The site is located within the seismically active southern California region. There are, however, no known active or potentially active faults presently mapped that pass through the site, nor is the site located within the presently defined limits of an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Active fault zones within the general site region include the Rose Canyon/Newport-Inglewood, Elsinore, and Coronado Bank/Palos Verdes Hills. Strong ground motion could also be expected from earthquakes occurring along the San Jacinto and San Andreas fault zones, which lie northeast of the site at greater distances, as well as a number of offshore fault. The following table lists the known active faults that would have the most significant impact on the site: Maximum Probable • Fault Earthquake Slip Rate Fault (Moment Magnitude) (mm/year) Type Rose Canyon 6.9 1.5 B 10.5-kilometers_(6.5-_ miles _SW) Elsinore (Julian Segment) 6.8 B 22-kilometers (13.6-miles NE) Coronado Bank/Palos Verdes Hills 7.4 3 B 35.5-kilometers_(21.9-miles_SW) HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. i•'. . .1 . ,.. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I Project No. 4824.1 Log No. 8639 I October 1, 2004 Page I SEISMIC EFFECTS Ground Accelerations I The most significant probable earthquake to affect the property would be a 6.9 magnitude earthquake on the Rose Canyon fault zone. Depiction of probabilistic ' seismic hazard analysis utilizing a consensus of historical seismic data and the respective iegional geologic conditions that are shown on the "The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic-Hazard Maps" (Reference 2) indicates that peak ground accelerations of about 0.20 to 0.30g are possible with a 10% probability of I being exceeded in 50-years,. .' Ground Cracks - 1 . The risk of fault surface rupture due to active faulting is considered low due to the absence of known active faulting on site. Ground cracks due to shaking from seismic 1 events in the region are possible, as with all of southern California. I . 3. Landsliding The risk of seismically induced landsliding affecting the site is considered, negligible I due to the 'relatively level 'topography of the property. 4. Liquefaction 1 The risk of liquefaction is considered low due to lack of shallow ground water and'the dense underlying terrace deposits. 1 5. Tsunamis I Due to the relatively low elevation of the property above sea level and proximity to Buena Vista Lagoon, the potential for seismically generated ocean waves impacting the site is considered low to moderate. I CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS I 1. General The proposed building additions to the existing single-family residence. are considered feasible from a geotechnical standpoint. Grading and foundation plans, should consider the appropriate geotechnical features of the site. The proposed construction is not anticipated to adversely impact the adjacent properties from a HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4824.1 Log No. 8639 October 1, 2004 Page geotechnical standpoint, assuming the recommendations presented in this report and good construction practices are implemented during design and construction. 2. Seismic Parameters for Structural Design Seismic considerations that should be used for structural design at the site include the following:• Ground Motion - The proposed additions should be designed and constructed to resist the effects of seismic ground. motions as provided in Chapter 16, Division IV-Earthquake Design of the 2001 California Building Code. The basis for the design is dependent on and considers seismic zoning, site characteristics, occupancy, configuration, structural system and building height. Soil Profile Type - In accordance with Section 1629.3.1, Table 16-J, and the underlying geologic conditions, a site Soil Profile of Type SD is considered appropriate for the subject property. Seismic Zone - In accordance with Section 1629.4.1 and Figure 16-2, the subject site is situated within Seismic Zone 4. I . d. Seismic Zone Factor (z) - A Seismic Zone Factor of 0.40 is assigned based on Table 164. Since the site is within Seismic Zone 4, Section 1629.4.2 requires a I Seismic Source Type and Near Source Factor. e. Near-Source Factor (Na and Nv) - Based on the known active faults in the region and distance of the faults from the site, a Seismic Source Type of B per Table 16- U, and Near Source Factors of Na = 1.0 per Table 16-S and Nv = 1.0 per Table 16-T are provided. I f. Seismic Coefficients (Ca and Cv) - Using the Soil Profile Type and Seismic Zone Factor along with Tables 16-Q and 16-R, the Seismic Coefficients Ca = 0.44 (Na) I and Cv = 0.64 (Nv) are provided, or Ca = 0.44 and Cv = 0.64. 3. Site Grading I Prior to grading, the area of the proposed one-story additions should be cleared of surface obstructions and debris, and stripped of vegetation. Materials generated during clearing should be properly disposed of at an approved location off-site. Holes I resulting from the removal of buried obstructions should be backfilled with compacted fill. Old septic systems, if encountered, should be removed in accordance I with local regulations. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4824.1 Log No. 8639. October 1, 2004 Page 7 Within the limits of the proposed one-story additions and to 3-feet beyond* where possible, the existing fill/topsoil should be removed down to approved terrace deposits and replaced with compacted fill in order to achieve design finish grades. Removal depths are anticipated to be approximately 1 to 1-1/2 feet below existing site grades. The Geotechnical Consultant should determine final removal depths during site grading. Excavation in sections may be necessary adjacent to the existing structure. Following removals, the exposed subgrade should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted to at least 90-percent relative compaction based upon ASTM: D 1557-00. Fill should be compacted by mechanical means in uniform horizontal lifts of 6 to 8- inches in thickness. All fill should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90-percent based upon ASTM: D 1557-00. The on-site materials are suitable for use as compacted fill. Rock fragments over 6-inches in dimension, perishable and unsuitable materials should be excluded from the fill. All grading and compaction should be observed and tested, as necessary, by the Geotechnical Consultant. 4. Foundation Recommendations The proposed building additions may be supported by new and existing conventional continuous/spread footings. New foundations for the proposed building additions should consist of conventional continuous/spread footings founded at least 18-inches into compacted fill or undisturbed terrace deposits. New continuous footings should be at least 15-inches wide and reinforced with a minimum of two #4 bars, one top and one bottom. New foundations located adjacent to utility trenches should extend to below a. 1: 1 plane projected upward from the bottom of the trench. New foundations bearing as recommended may be designed for a dead plus live load bearing value of 2000-pounds-per-square-foot. Existing footings may be assumed to possess a dead-plus-live-load bearing value of 1500-pounds-per-square-foot These values may be increased by one-third for loads including wind and seismic forces. A lateral bearing value of .250-pounds-per-square-foot per foot of depth and a coefficient of friction between foundation soil and concrete of 0.35 may be assumed. These values assume that footings will be poured neat against the foundation soils. Footing excavations should be observed by the Geotechnical Consultant prior to the placement of reinforcing steel in order to verify that they are founded in suitable bearing materials. During construction, the Structural Engineer and Geotechnical HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. I I GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION I Project No. 4824.1 Log No. 8639 I October 1,.2004 Page I Engineer should observe existing foundations intended to support new structural loads to verify their suitability. If the existing footings are not suitable to support new structural loads, deepening of the existing footings or new footings may be necessary. i 1 Slab-on-grade floors should have a minimum thickness of 4-inches and should be reinforced with #3 bars spaced at 18-inches, center-to-center, in two directions, and supported on chairs so that the reinforcement is at mid-height in the slab. A 4-inch layer of clean sand should underlie slabs with at least a 10-mil visqueen vapor barrier placed at mid-height in the sand. 1 5. Soluble Sulfate I A representative sample of the on-site soil was submitted for sulfate analyses. The result of the soluble sulfate test per EPA 9038 methods is presented on the attached Laboratory Test Results, Figure 5. The sulfate content of the on-site soil is consistent ' with a negligible sulfate exposure classification per Table 19-A-4 of the 2001 California Building Code. Consequently, special provisions for sulfate resistant concrete are not considered necessary. 1 6. Trench Backfill I All .trench backfill should be compacted to at least 90-percent relative compaction based upon ASTM: D1557-00 and the backfill should be observed and tested by the Geotechnical 'Consultant. 1 7: Site Drainage I . The following, recommendations are intended to minimize the potential adverse effects of water on the structure and appurtenances. Surface drainage should be - . designed by the project Architect and/or Civil Engineer. . a. Consideration should be given to providing the structure with roof gutters and downspouts that discharge to an area drain system and/or to suitable locations away from the structure.. b. All site drainage should be directed away from the structure. On-site soils are generally sandy in nature and considered erodible if exposed to concentrated drainage. I c. No landscaping should be allowed against the structure. Moisture accumulation or watering adjacent to foundations can resuft in deterioration of wood/stucco and I may affect foundation performance. HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Li GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4824.1 Log No. 8639 October 1, 2004 Page Irrigated areas should not be over-watered. Irrigation should be limited to that required to maintain the vegetation. Additionally, automatic systems must be I . seasonally adjusted to minimize over-saturation potential particularly in the winter (rainy) season. All yard and roof drains should be periodically, checked to verify they are not blocked and flow properly. This may be accomplished either visually or, in the case of subsurface drains, by placing a hose at the inlet and checking the outlet for flow. 8. Recommended Observation and Testing During Construction The following tests and/or observations by the Geotechnical , Consultant are recommended: a: Observation and testing of grading. Foundation excavations prior to placement of forms and reinforcing steel. Interior and exterior utility trench backfill. 9. Grading and Foundation Plan Review I Grading and foundation plans should be reviewed by the Geotechnical Consultant to confirm conformance with the recommendations presented herein or to modify the recommendations as necessary. LIMITATIONS The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions, as they. existed at the time of our investigation and further assume the excavations to be representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site. If different subsurface conditions from those encountered during our exploration are observed or appear to be present in excavations, the Geotechnical Consultant should be promptly notified for review and reconsideration of the recommendations. I I I I I I HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Project No. 4824.1 Log No. 8639 October 1, 2004 Page 10 Our investigation was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable Geotechnical Consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions, please call this office. Het 7 gi eerin Inc. n S aso. Geldert Registered Civil Engineer 63912 (expires 9/30/06) I ~aul.A. We~ Registered Geologist 3772 Certified Engineering Geologist 1153 (expires 3/31/06) li ic elVasco e os Project Geologist Distribution: 4-Addressee Attachments: Location Map Figure 1 Plot Plan Figure 2 Log of Test Pits Figures 3 and 4 Laboratory Test Results Figure 5 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. I • I 1 California Division of Mines. and Geology, "Geologic Maps of the Northwestern Part of San Diego County, California, Oceanside, San Luis Rey, San Marcos, Encinitas and Rancho Santa Fe 7.5' Quadrangles," Plate 1,, Open-File Report 96- 02, dated 1996. Cao, Tianging, et al "The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic Hazard I I . Maps," dated June 2003. ICBO, "California Building Code," 2001 Edition. . I . ICBO, "Maps of Known Active Faults Near-Source Zones, in California and Adjacent Portions of Nevada," dated February 1998. Jennings, Charles W., "Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas," California Data Map Series, Map No. 6, dated 1994. Kessner Construction, "Mr. And Mrs. Rodriguez Remodel and Second Story • Addition," undated Kennedy, Michael P., "Geology of the San Diego Metropolitan Area, California, Section A (Western San Diego Metropolitan Area)," ,California Division of Mines I . and Geology, Bulletin 200, dated 1975. i Peterson, M., Beeby, W., Bryant, W., et al., "Seismic Shaking Hazard Maps of I California," California Division.of Mines and Geology, Map Sheet 48, dated 1999. Weber, Harold F., Jr., "Recent Slope Failures, Ancient Landslides, and Related Geology or the North-Central Coastal Area, San Diego County, California," California Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 82-12LA, dated 1982. Project No. 4824.1 HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Log No. 8639 I -J 0 Ci) o 1 2 ___ I I 5 10 15 20 o 1~ LEGEND TP-31X1 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEST PIT 0) (0. c) 0 0 (0 v -I __J c -H Lfl -H CD n c-n C ID II-_u"1 L \ \\\N \'N PROPOSED \ \\ ONE-STORY PROPOSED SECOND-STORY ADDITIONS ADDITION OVER EXISTlNG"N" RESIDENCE N 90167 7-7 01 fT1TP-3 IN IEI - - CL 00 v-f- CD CD REFERENCE:. "Mr. & Mrs. Rodriguez Remodel and Second Story Addition," Sheet AZ, by Kessner Construction, undated BACKHOE COMPANY: Earthworks Techniques BUCKET SIZE: Hand Pit DATE: 08/26/04 CD >' U) o U) SOIL DESCRIPTION El D Z 00 c'rnE-' H—.. CJ)q-4 ElU) U) E- co ZO) 4ZO HZ— °°°'° H ° TESTPITNO.TP-1 ELEVATION: U)U)E-4 Z0 - U)- - 00 Light red brown silty fine to medium sand, damp, medium dense, friable TERRACE DEPOSITS:Dark red brown silty fine to medium grained sand, moist, dense, slight porosity, few rootlets in the upper 6-inches. Total Depth 36-inches No Water No Caving Footing: 12-inches wide, founded 17-inches below grade 10.0 TEST PIT NO. TP-2 ELEVATION: 0.0 — — — ______ _______ - FILL/TOPSOIL:Light red brown silty fine to medium sand, dry, — medium dense, friable — TERRACE DEPOSITS:Dark red brown silty fine to medium - grained sand, dry, dense, slight porosity, few rootlets in the upper 6-inches. I Total Depth 42-inches 5.OH No Water I No Caving Footing: 12-inches wide, founded 22-inches below grade 10.0 LOG OF TEST PITS 2452 Tuttle Street HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Carlsbad, California GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 4824.1 FIGURE NO. 3 BACKHOE COMPANY: Earthworks Techniques BUCKET SIZE: Hand Pit DATE: 08/26/04 Cl)-. U). i U) SOIL DESCRIPTION E- 'Z 00 ZCI) >4Z0 U)E HZ-. i.1Cl) TEST PIT NO. TP-3 ELEVATION: t 0.0 >< - SM FILL!TOPSOIL:Dark red brown silty medium sand, moist, - medium dense, medium porous, friable. Rootlets in the upper - 109 11.3 - 6-inches. TERRACE DEPOSITS:Medium red brown silty medium grained sand, moist, dense, slight porosity, few rootlets in the upper 114 7.5 6-inches. Becomes very dense at 32-inches. Total Depth 40-inches 5. No Water No Caving 10.0 LOG OF TEST PITS 2452 Tuttle Street HETHERINGTON ENGINEERING, INC. Carlsbad, California GEOTECI-INICAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO. 4824.1 FIGURE NO. 4 - 4 TP-1@0-1' •1. 0.00883 ,L NXI NS xM9 ; .' 1 I 1F I T829)jx Initial 1CbTPct 4Fial Exansin N Sample L6'cation .,r,' S '• ..... c ! Moisture (%)Dry iPóténtiaI ity Oms 40 , TP-3@0-1' 8.9'. 115.2 13.5 7 . Very Low :::',: i 2 4MAXIMUMDRY DE 21 SiTY/pRTIMUM1MOISTURE €ONTENT r :a[ '00ANi ' TWIEU '' ' ,. i '1it 'I MAN . •,, ,• I...I . Sample Location escription .. , D tMaximumDry 'Optimum Moisture ri" Dfsj(pi) , Content (% TP-1 @ 0-1' Light red brown silty sand ,• 127.0 • 10.0 011 Samp1e L ti i1ef I $ 1riçtio TP-1@0-1' 30 SO Nf lun : ñiaiks P si) -::q,_ 150 Remolded to 90% relative compaction, soaked, consolidated, drained Carlsba.d CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE PAYMENT OF SCHOOL FEES OR OTHER MITIGATION This form must be completed by the City, the applicant, and the appropriate school districts and returned to the City prior to issuing a building permit. The City will not issue any building permit without a completed school fee form. Project Name: Building Permit Plan Check Number: Project Address: A.P.N.: Project Applicant (Owner Name): Project Description: Building Type: Residential: Second Dwelling Unit: 9CI -J-2 TVTTL ir Square Feet of Living Area in New Dwelling Square Feet of Living Area in SDU Residential Additions: Net Square Feet New Area ZK Commercial/Industrial: Square Feet Floor Area City Certification of Applicant Information: Date: arlad Unified School District 6225 El Camino Real Carlsbad CA 92009 (331-5000) Encinitas Union School District 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4300 ext 166) San Marcos Unified School District 215 Mata Way San Marcos, CA 92069 (290-2649) Contact: Nancy Dolce (By Aunt. Or, San Dieguito Union High School District 710 Encinitas Blvd. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Certification of Applicant/Owners. The person executing this declaration ("Owner") certifies under penalty of perjury that (1) the information provided above is correct and true to the best of the Owner's knowledge, and that the Owner will file an amended certification of payment and pay the additional fee if Owner requests an increase in the number of dwelling units or square footage after the building permit is issued or if the initial determination of units or square footage is found to be incorrect, and that (2) the Owner is the owner/developer of the above described project(s), or that the person executing this declaration is authorized to sign on behalf of the Owner. Signature: Date: 1635 Faraday Avenue • Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 • (760) 602-2700 Revised 4/20/00 - - - Building Counter • (760) 602-2719 • FAX (760) 602-8558 SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the school district(s)) THIS FORM INDICATES THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN OR WILL BE SATISFIED. SCHOOL DISTRICT: The undersigned, being duly authorized by the applicable School District, certifies that the developer, builder, or owner has satisfied the obligation for school facilities. This is to certify that the applicant listed on page 1 has paid all amounts or completed other applicable school mitigation determined by the School District. The City may issue building permits for this project. SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICIAL TITLE NAME OF SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE PHONE NUMBER 7(0c — -5c(D Revised 4/20/00 'S.