Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2415 TUTTLE ST; ; CB901111; Permit& Credits .00 , ----------------- \ -'1'600 .00 9,010.00 it Ext fee Data ----------------- 899.00 I 584.00 / 12:00 / 6061.00Y V • 01 600.00 1 1713.00 Y .01PPD V 986'9:00 7.501 35.00 6.50 2,.50 V 2'.50. 7.50 62.00 5.00 1 25.00' V 30.00 15.00 Y .9.00 18.00 6.50 49.00 . 2.50 6.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 25 9.00 4.50 6.50 BUILDING PERMIT 03/14/91 15:11 Page. 1.of 1 Job Address: 2415 TUTTLE ST Permit Type: SINGLE FAMILY DWLNG - DETACHED Parcel No: 1 155 1 W4Oo Valuation: 173,177 Construction Type: VN Occupancy Group: R3/M1 Class Code: Desèription: 2161 SF + 493 SF GAR + 210 SF DECK + 70 SF PATIO CT 89-35 Appl/Ownr : MAUDLIN, LYNN V 1857 TIJLE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Str: Permit No: CB9O1111 Project 'NO: A9001210 Development No: Fl: Ste: .1.385 03/14/91 0001 ()1 02 C-PR1T CT89-35 -Status: ISSUED Applied: 07/03/90 Apr/Issue: 03/14/91 .Validated By: RS 619-438-2110 OWNER :. ESCANO, RAY 7 Lic. OWNER 800 GRAND AV/ r, CARLSBAD, CA 926O( 'Thtiç'/J *** Fees Required /*** Fees Co ------------------- Fees: .' . Adjustments. / ,L . 0( '.Total Credit Total Fees: .10,01,0:: 00-'--. -Total..-Pámnt &i Fee description( U ts Fee Building Plan Strong Motion Fee Enter 'Y' to AutocaVlc P.F.F. F.M.F./G.M.F. and Zone(99). Enter '.Y' to AutocalcT.I'F). '-J, I> ,oi \" Enter Number of EDU's\ Enter 'Y' to Autocaic MF.F//Y t,, >-. Enter Park-in-Lieu Dist#('9) tw'ice/$ ( * BUILDING TOTAL U \J .7 Enter NY" for Plumbing Issue Each Plumbing Fixture or Trap > 14.00 Each Building Sewer > 1.00 Each Water Heater and/or Vent > 1.00 Gas Piping System > 1.00 Each Vacuum Breaker > 3.00 V * PLUMBING TOTAL •' : V Enter "Y" for Electric Issue Fee > Single Phase Per AMP > 100.00' * ELECTRICAL TOTAL ($10 Minimum) Enter 'V for Mechanical Issue Fee> Install Furn/Ducts > V 1.00 Each Install/Reloc Appliance Vent > 4.00 Each Hood/Fireplace > 1.00 * MECHANICAL TOTAL 619-7201000 CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 920( gFALLAPPROVAL. INSP.DATE1/ CLEAR - -7/ 1619 438-1161 CA< SEWER PERMIT 03/14/91 15:08 Permit No: SE9001&ti Page lof 1 Job Address: 2415 TUTTLE ST Permit Type: SEWER - RESIDENTIAL 1 7 Parcel No: • • )( ) 385. OJ14/91. 000101 02 C-PRMT 5000-00 Description: VISTA SAN MALO Status: ISSUED 4 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES Applied: 11/29/90 Apr/Issue: 03/14/9 Permitee: MAUDLIN, LYNN V 619-438-2110 Expired: 1857 TULE CT Prepared By: S.S. CARLSBAD, CA 92009 *** Fees Required **A **_—L_Yees Collected & Credits Fees: 5,000.00 Adjustments: /bo Crets: .00 Ttal.. Fees: 5,09O.00 .00 / BancDue: 5,000.00 Fee description / c\ i't Ext fee Data Enter Number of uflift5 / 4. 00' 4.00 SEWER TOTAL / Sewer Fee 5000.00 5000,00 CITY OF CARLSBAD 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 cit of Carlsbad September 26, 1990 These are addresses for CT 89-35, Map 12779 in the City of Carlsbad ,0 APN# 155-160-12 jl.! Lot 1 2415 TUTTLE STREET (OI 10 7D /7 177 Lot 2 1140 NIKI LYNN PLACE I1,9J Lot 3 1130 NIKI LYNN PLACE 'cf [10 (95 jwt5 Lot 4 1120 NIKI LYNN 1'-io ; qs DORIS COSMAN - Building Department o 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009 • (619) 438-1161 I EST.VAL (Q ((7O PLAN CE DEPOSIT___________________________ I VALID. BY DATE )7i o3/ PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 1. PERMIT TYPE I . A p COMMERCIAL L] NEW DTENANT IMPROVEMENT S B 0 INDUSTRIAL DNEW DTENANT IMPROVEMENT C - RESIDENTIAL DAPARTMENT DCONDO )filNGLE FAMILY DWELLING DADDITION/ALTERATION DUPLEX DDEMOLITION DRELOCATION DMOBILE HOME DELECTRICAL DPLUMBING DMECHANICAL DPOOL DSPA DRETAINING WALL OSOLAR DOTHER________________ a iiii V Nearest Cross Streets t_Ar5 Energy Calcs '2 Structural Calcs Jff12 Soils Report 111 Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL (_.II"i_I" EXISTING USE VA./7&U-r PROPOSED USE LóiL ~ A-s ;;'g39 ;G'de BLDG. 50. FTG: 4 OF STORIES CONTACT PERSON NAME V.Mk)OLA CITY • (_ STATE ADDRESS ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE 4f.3,e,,d24 Lc:) SIGNATURE .A_ APPLICANT DCONTRACTOR DAGENT FOR CONTRACTOR DOWNER DAGENT FOR OWNER NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE P LES EE NAME OWNER ADDRESS 0MGJ!AK0y []TENANT I CITY STATE ZIP CODE qqm DAY TELEPHONE "72.ci i cicD CONTRACTOR [b ADDRESS NAME CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE STATE LIC. 4 LICENSE CLASS CITY BUSINESS LIC. 4 SIGNATURE TITLE DATE DESIGNER NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE STATE LIC. H WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an aónitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800. Lab. Q. INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. EXPIRATION DATE Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shalt not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044. Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon,, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sole. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dol.arç f100)). C's. SIGNATURE I DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYES []NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES []NO Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES ONO IF ANY 01 THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1. 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS PET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROl. DISTRICT. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 30970) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JLEEJJENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work isFnced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE I DOWNER []CONTRACTOR DBY PHONE APPROVED BY: II%.b.. -h. .i"r DATE: I File YELLOW: Ar,plicáiiTPINK: Finance CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERMIT# CB901111 FOR 09/17/91 DESCRIPTION: 2161 SF + 493 SF GAR + 210 SF DECK + 70 SF PATIO CT 89-35 TYPE: SFD JOB ADDRESS: 2415 TUTTLE ST APPLICANT: MAUDLIN, LYNN V PHONE: CONTRACTOR: PHONE: OWNER: ESCANO, RAY REMARKS: RS/MYRON/755-2721 SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR AREA PY PLANCK# CB901111 0CC GRP CONSTR. TYPE NEW STR: FL: STE: 619-438-2110 PHONE: 619-720-1000 INSPECTOR TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- CD LVL DESCRIPTION 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical PERMIT# TYPE 5E900160 SWRSD STATUS ISSUED ACT COMMENTS ***** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 051791 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PY 051791 Interior Lath/Drywall AP PY 051591 Insulation AP PY 051491 Rough Combo AP PY 050991 Rough Combo CO PY SEE COMMENTS 04303 Rough Combo CO PY 042391 Shear Panels/HD's AP PY 042391 Roof/Reroof AP PY 040391 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY 040291 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY HOUSE SLAB 032991 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PY FOOTINGS ONLY 032591 Steel/Bond Beam CA PY 032591 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CA PY 031891 Underground/Under Floor AP PY / FINAL BUILDIN PE TION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNIN I U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB901111 DATE: 08/09/91 PERNIT#: CB901111 PERMIT TYPE: SFD PROJECT NAME: 2161 SF + 493 SF GAR + 210 SF DECK +70 SF PATIO CT 8935/A' ADDRESS: 2415 TUTTLE ST CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MYRON/7 55-2721 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: DATE INSPECTED INSPECTED: - qli2lll APPROVED DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED - COMMENTS: FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION RECEIVED AUB 1 2 19i DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE? PLANNING U/M WATER • PLAN CHECK#: CB901111 DATE: 08/09/91 PERMIT#: CB901111 PERMIT TYPE: SFD PROJECT NAME: 2161 SF + 493 SF GAR + 210 SF DECK + 70 SF PATIO CT 89-35 ADDRESS: CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MYRON/755-2721 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: INSPECTED DATE j BY: (. INSPECTED: APPROVED k DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - -DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED - ------------------- COMMENTS; S I It' • • • I FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M PLAN CHECK#: CB901111 PERNIT#: CB901111 - PROJECT NAME: 2161 SF + 493 SF GAR + 210-SF DECK + 70 SF PATIO CT 89-35 ADDRESS: 2415 TUTTLE=ST CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MYRON/7 55-2721 WATER DATE: 08/09/91 PERMIT TYPE: SFD SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: I NSPECTED DATE 9,1-Z-91 BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: NAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING INEERG FIRE PLANNING U/M PLAN CHECK#: CB901111 PER1vIIT#: CB901111 PROJECT NAME: 2161 SF + 493 SF GAR + 210 SF DECK + 70 SF PATIO CT 89-35 ADDRESS: 4!rE.;i CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MYRON/755-2721 SEWER DIST: WATER DIST: DATE: 08/09/91 PERMIT TYPE: SFD INSPECTED DATE BY: _______________ INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED - INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED COMMENTS: COMPACTION LABS, INC. Post Office Box 271338, Escondido, CA 92027 ii &I a IL u Mo u uu u uui ar.191VIUme (619) 741-5289 ...-.-FIELD DENSITY TESTS ASTMD2922 Job _JP7f?. - 1' A1.4!, ' Job No. Sh..t Of Machine No. c)t)c7_ Information To: Hours miles TEST NUMBER 4 RETEST No 5 HORIZONTAL LOCATION 6 . ___________ ___________ • • ___________ ___________ - ___________ ___________ ___________ _i .ci-.-J VERTICAL c., LOCATION MOISTURE CPM 21. DENSITY CPM (2: ,LL AIR CAP CPM _____ '-i: • , 4'. jt.. RATIO WET DENSITY ,-,',D bi.i) / f,7L i,'Jø,MIPf) WATER ii / DRY DENSITY a PCF % MOISTURE 9 z ,1. 1/ ,2L A lJilLA r 2 2d 1. ______ SOIL 10 No 10 4': ,P - _________ ________ _________ _________ _________ ,.MAX DENSITY 'IREOUIRD ' iI_J7,7 % COMPACTION A?011 J .4 11L_JLoof ULLL LAr - -C±-j 9i_ dt__ = ===:; - - 2L L -- _- -- E! - - - ------4-4 _ APPROVED BY COMPACTION LABS, INC. SL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES March 20, 1991 Project No. CL-4058 Horizon Pacific Properties 800 Grand Avenue, Suite A—i Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Myron Cram Subject: Report of Compaction Plumbing Trench.Backfills at Building Areas 4—Lot Subdivision Las Flores Drive & Tuttle Street .Carlsbad, California APN 155-160-12. Dear Mr. Cram: In response to your request, we are sending herewith results of laboratory and compaction tests performed on March 18, 1991 for the subject property. Test results indicate interior plumbing trench backfills at the building areas were compacted to a minimum of ninety percent (90%). Therefore, we recommend construction continue as scheduled. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. (SSI4 Respectfully submitted, COMPACTION LABS, INC. ~~. Mir ichard E. Saks Chief Financial Officer rr w M GE 713 rr II0. ('i*. _9-3013 C 1A _ * 4d 4' Dale R. Regli EOFC.\cS Registered Civil 9393 Geotechnical Engineer 000713 RES: ras cc: (3) submitted (2) filed Post Office Box 301338, Escondido, CA 92030 (619) 741-5289 COMPACTION LABS, INC. PROJECT CL-4058 SOIL TESTING & INSPECTION SERVICES PLATE NO. ONE I TABULATION OF TEST RESULTS TEST # DATE HORIZONTAL VERTICAL FIELD MOISTURE I DRY DENSITY 1 SOIL 1 PERCENT LOCATION LOCATION % DRY WI. J LB./CU. FT. J TYPE J COMPACTION 79 3/18/91 LOT 4 RSG 9.8 118.2 I 91.3 80 11 LOT 3 RSG 10.5 112.7 II . 92;8 81 LOT 2 RSG 11.6 11.1.6 II 91.8 82 LOT 1 RSG 8.4 117.9 I 91.6 REMARKS: TEST NOS. 1-78 WERE PRESENTED IN PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED REPORT(S). RSG = ROUGH SUBGRADE (90% REQUIRED). OPTIMUM MOISTURE/MAXIMUM DENSITY MAXIMUM OPTIMUM SOIL DESCRIPTION TYPE DRY DENSITY MOISTURE (ib/cuft.,) (% dry wt) BROWN SILTY-SAND . I 129.5 . 10.0 YELLOW-TAN SILTY-SAND W/ BINDER (IMPORT) 11 .121.5 10.5 ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 5601468 DATE: -. JURISDICTION: PLAN CHECK NO: ,11 11 SET: J1 PROJECT ADDRESS:,) PROJECT NAME: 4 APPLICANT FILE COPY UPS DESIGNER lil The .plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply •with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified . are resolved and checked by building department staff. . . .D. Théplanstransmittéd herewith have sigiuificant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. ]The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. E] The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to. the applicantcontact person. fl The applicant's copy.of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. fl Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted:_______________________ Date contacted: Telephone.! 0 REMARKS: . By: Enclosures: !%JtPi.e ESGIL CORPORATION IGA . DAA DRN 0DM ... .....,.-...... .....................-..-..-- ..................... ESGIL CORPORATION 9320CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560.1468 DATE: - , JURISDICTION: , ?LAN CHECK NO: C-ci o SET: LI) PROJECT ADDRESS: PROJECT NAME: LA -. APPLICANT Ci3iRISD IC' IO PLAWtHECKER OFILE COPY nups EDESIGNER (1 The plans transmitted :ereWitfl :EVC been correced where U necessary and substantially comiv with the jurisdiction's building codes. The clans transmitted herewith will substantiaIlvcomlv Lj with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- C1CS denie are resolved and checked by bui.lding department staff. The D1ans transzT:itted herewith have significant deficiencies U de-ti on te e-ccseo check list -and s-c.!d be cc_:ected and resub.itted for a cozrlete recheck. tw The ch eck list zras-rtte he-rev-it _s for \ o.r infox-m ti n. m plans are being held at Esgil Cc-1-0. until corrected plans are submitted for recbec:c.._ The appljcat!s copy of t: check list is enclosed for the Jur1socz:on to return to tne a??llcant contact person. The applicant's cop' of the check list has been sent to: 5771 cr. Ce. , 6. Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact oerson that plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed.. Person contacted: Date contacted: Telephone REMARKS: By: Enclosures: f.4o.c ESGIL CORPORATION D GA U AA 0 vw Di DM It. (I) 14 I.e. C,) 0r fn ,. & e • (I — 'j7c oc .r-. 15 e 1'S,v Sol, TF, C k, a r jI kS 5Pcc.e.A IS )c_\ 0% ()ILL (_)Via M' :. ,Y '-.,'cI'4S Iiøy. 4., rim ifoe alt PA L - £. s • r. ( a7 r11 t, V. 0 £rtSS ' ? i3 (5'w .1 cV • 1 G' ? it41. ? V m AA4c . - (c... ..C...) C4n.. 4SoAe _t4j Date 12 Prepared byi Jurisdiction________________ o 31d. Dept, VALUA?TO AD ?L Cli G-Sgi1 '.:- LAN ciEc< O.__ BUILDING ADDRESS - e,(\) A??LICMT/C0)TT "p' - o. - 3UILDTh'G CCU?MC - D-E SI C NER ?WO - TY?E OF C0$ST •C?0 COTACTO ?,.-*ON7- SvildIK6 Pe;yjjt ree.s - _s )C8 •G Plan Check Fee S COHtiCNTS1 SHEET OF 12/87 e Date Jurisdiction Prepared byt 31d. Dept. VALUATO AN D ?LCC< FEE S 9 i I - ?LAN c:zc:< t BUILDING ADDRESS A??LICMT/C0TACT Lv-i - ONE NO. - U1LDThG OCCU?AC - ?O - T?E OF ON CONTRACTOR ?:oE___________ Permit ree.s Plan Check Tee S CO)iM.CNTS SHE ® OF -- 87 4 Da tei.21~~...Q.. Jurisdiction C\o Prepared bYs 0 31d. Dept. VALUATION AND ?LCCX?EE QSgi. ?LA X czc:< O._C_( 3UILD1]G ADD3EZS ... .k??LICT/C0'TACT -_- ?;o NO. - BOLDING OCCU?AC - •i2s POE - T? 0? C0ST?1jCT04 CON TRACTOR :o___________ B vildirij Per ,t tee. S Plan Cheek Fee S S SHEET OF 12187 Date 1,A0.. Jurisdiction Prepared byt C331d. Dept. VALUA?O AN D ?LCHECXFE 9-sgit ?L Al, c:zc:< 'I' 3UILD1G ADDRESS ,T. .c??LICAT/C0TAC? V'L_- ?:o o. BUILDING OCCU?AC' - DES IG NER__1_'' ?O - T? O COST?CTICN CON TR ACTOR S Bifldj Per mist ree.s ' Plan Check ree 5 Do1 C 0 M MCNTS SHEET OF Q -- 12/87 BUILDING PLANCHECK ENGINEERING CHECKLIST (I DATE: JUL C)O _a5 O PLANCHECK No.qO — HI 2 3 2415 TUTTLE &T tPJ —I(—L Z ITEM COMPLETE ITEM INCOMPLETE - NEEDS YOUR ACTION X ITEM SELECTED C C C H H H E E E C C C K ,K K PROJECT ID:_______ LEGAL REQUIREMENTS Site Plan 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: north-arrow, propettyLtnes=,= easements exiting..and..piQpo sed structures, streets,-=ex-isUn.g - street improvements , rJghof r7( ri ii r'r L!J U L.._J '' 2. Show on site plan: Finish, floor elevations, pad elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes, driveway with percent (%) grade and drainage patterns. and Assessors Parcel Number. Discretionary Approval Compliance No Discretionary approvals were required. Project complies with all Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No._______________________ Y 6. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of Approval for Project No.c.T -_M:;'35 k' 49' Conditions complied with by: Date:__________ Field Review Field review completed. No issues raised. Field Review completed. The following issues or discrepancies with the site plan were found: Site lacks adequate public improvements. Existing drainage improvements not shown or in conflict with site plan. Site is served by overhead power lines. 0. Grading is required to access site, create pad or provide for ultimate street improvement. FRM001O.DH • • 08/29/89 Site access visibility problems exist. Provide onsite turnaround or engineered solution to problem. Other:______________________________________________ Dedication Requirements No dedication required. Dedication required. Please have a registered Civil Engineer or Land Surveyor prepare the appropriate legal description together with an 84" x 11" plat map and submit with a title report and the required processing fee. All easement documents must be approved and signed by owner(s) prior toissuance of Building Permit. The description of the dedication is as follows: Dedication completed, Date: By: Improvement Requirements No public improvements required. to occupancy. Public improvements required. This project requires construction of public improvements pursuant to Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please have a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate improvement plans and submit. for separate plancheck process through the Engineering Department. Improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit. The required improvements are:__________________________________________ Improvement plans signed, Date:, 20 t.JOV q By: L.4'3BS FRM001O . OH 08/29/89 13. Improvements are required. Construction of the public improvements may be deferred in accordance with Section 18.40 of the City Code. Please submit a letter requesting deferral of the required improvements together with a recent title report on the property and the appropriate processing fee so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. The Future Improvement Agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future Improvement Agreement completed, Date_______________ By:_______________ Grading Requirements ______13a. Inadequate information available on site plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Please provide more detailed proposed and existing elevations and contours. Include accurate estimates of the grading quantities (cut, fill, import, export). 14. No grading required as determined by the information provided on the site plan. RE., / 15. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be submitted for separate plan check and approval through the Engineering Department. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be issued and grading substantially complete and found acceptable to the City Inspector prior to issuance of Building Permits. Grading Inspector sign off. Date:2DFgI By:/.LLItAit Miscellaneous Permits 16. Right-of-Way Permit not required. '& 17. Right-of-Way Permit required. A separate Right-of-Way Permit issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following:_SrI2JtcnOrJ O TiP (Al Rt.W. Sewer Permit is not required. Sewer Permit is required. A Sewer Permit is required concurrent with Building Permit issuance. The fee required is noted below in the fees section. Industrial Waste Permit is not required. FRM0010 . DH 08/29/89 Q. 21. Industrial Waste Permit is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Applicantion Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Permits must be issued prior to occupancy. Industrial Waste Permit accepted - Date: By:________________ Fees Required D __ Park-in-Lieu Fee 10 ERE Ptf @EFOI2E NNV7 APPQD.,.. 23. Quadrant: Fee per Unit: Total Fee:_______ Traffic Impact Fee Fee Per Unit:(OU Total Fee: 2-44M Bridge and Thoroughfare Fee Fee per Unit: Total Fee: Public Facilities Fee required. Facilities Management Fee Zone: I Fee: 0 )(25. /26. 27. Sewe! Fees Permit No.SE'OOI(aO EDU's _4 Feet5,cfr) 3 - PER t4iA 28. Sewer Lateral required: )'9R SA-)14 Fee:__________________ REMARKS:SCI-4mL FEES -ro BE PAID 8F)I2E RJILMmr, Pr-'R", I7' MP 4U$T QECb JL P1/&J ff C UTffl F- *Th JYAJ PM rr i ENGINEERING AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE PERMIT BY:.Ct4F1FLL Date: ?NPDPMT+TID&1 LOTS IJb+ C79-ç / LC-4L CY1PT1O4J easo j&irn I4T UC14 Is 'or QECO/ZDEb. Afy -3c_ bo FRMOO1O.D !"1Pr i'2713 1 L08/29/89 it r1i PLANNING CHECKLIST Plan Check No. ct- i/il Address zq's 171_ - APN: irr—fo— !2 Planner j41i tytL Phone 438-1161 (Name) Type of Project and Use SEZ ft" it"7. Zone ___ Facilities Management Zone . . . U U U V V V .c .c . cJ C C C (5 (5 (5 0. 0. 0. Legend Item Complete Item Incomplete - Needs your action 1, 2, 3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number that deficiency was identified Environmental Review Required: YES ,&... NO ____ TYPE P1rr/6A7-rO DATE OF COMPLETION: 0 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval a'i'ø WALL. Discretionary Action Required: YES /( NO TYPE CT '-r APPROVAL/RESO. NO. 299 DATE: q_q-qo PROJECT NO. c7-9q-3 OTHER RELATED CASES: Fob 0 f'-i7 Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval I'.J9-.-o4k.,. cc'x—A7PRaueiO cc442. Coastal: YES 7<.. NO ____ DATE OF APPROVAL: 6-'-f'spa Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval Landscape Plan Required: YES _( NO (°,.'0/774 0-/6 See attached submittal requirements for landscape plans Site Plan: C3 13 Provide fully dimensioned a site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width and dimensioned setbacks. EKE] 0 Show on Site Plan: Finish floor elevations, elevations of finish grade adjacent to building, existing topographical lines, existing and proposed slopes and driveway. Provide legal description of property. 13 Provide assessor's parcel number. Zoning: Setbacks: Front: Required Shown _4ft?Ai P"1. Int. Side: Required 4 Shown • Street Side: Required ia Shown z& Rear: Required Shown zr' ffJ Lot coverage: Required Shown 169 If f1oc4S SO 0 Height: Required 'Shown 2_2' EE163 0 Parking: Spaces Required Shown 7-3 Guest Spaces Required Shown Additional comments and remarks have been made on the building plans. These marked-up plans may be picked up at the Building Department. These marked- up plans must be resubmitted with the revised plans for this project. Have plans been marked up? YES NO Do 0 Additional Comments JOK TO ISSUE DATE /- o- 7/ PLNCK. FRM 2560 ORION WAY CARLSBAD, CA 92008 TELEPHONE (619)931-2121 Qtitp of (1Car1bat FIRE DEPARTMENT APP PAGE 1 OFL. PLAN CHECK REPORT PLAN CHECK#' 70—//// PROJECT I $T d'i FV1A(-JD ADDRESS 2 'j IS T(i T7-/-t=— ARCHITECT LVM ADDRESS' (I&LS,rSL3 PHONE OWNER k'¼( 1!PtM t ADDRESS PHONE. OCCUPANCY R3 CONST. ___________ TOTAL SQ. FT. STORIES O SPAIN KLERED 0 TENANT IMP. APPROVAL OF PLANS IS PREDICATED ON CONFORMING TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND/OR MAKING THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS: PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND PERMITS 1. Provide one copy of: floor plan(s); site plan; sheets - 2. Provide two site plans showing the location of all existing fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project. Provide specifications for the following: £?LiiL J)9AW ,0AJLS Th? Permits are required for the Installation of all fire protection systems (sprinklers, stand pipes, dry chemical, halon, COa, alarms, hydrants). Plan must be approved by the fire department prior to Installation. The business owner shall complete a building information letter and return it to the fire department. FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT The following fire protection systems are required: Automatic fire sprinklers (Design Criteria: O Dry Chemical, Halon, COa (Location: O Stand Pipes (Type: O Fire Alarm (Type/Location: 7. Fire Extinguisher Requirements: O One 2A rated ABC extinguisher for each - extinguisher not to exceed 75 feet of travel. An extinguisher with a minimum rating of - 0 Other: 8. Additional fire hydrant(s) shall be provided sq. ft. or portion thereof with a travel distance to the nearest to be located: EXITS Exit doors shall be openable from the inside without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort. A sign stating, "This door to remain unlocked during business hours" shall be placed above the main exit and doors EXIT signs (6" x 3/4 " letters) shall be placed over all required exilts and directional signs located as necessary to clearly Indicate the location of exit doors. GENERAL Storage, dispensing or use of any flammable or combustible liquids, flammable liquids, flammable gases and hazardous chemicals shall comply with Uniform Fire Code. Building(s) not approved for high piled combustible stock. Storage in closely packed piles shall not exceed 15 feet In height, 12 feet on pallets or in racks and 6 feet for tires, plastics and some flammable liquids. If high stock pil- ing is to be done, comply with Uniform Fire Code, Article 81. Additional Requirements. I. 41 DO 5ffA&4E J4'14 OF ?'t rT lwy~.41~nvn Comply with regulations on attached sheet(s). Plan Examiner C_C 'j ••_•___,4• Date_i/i /9 Report mailed to architect _______ Met with -Attach to Plans V ARCHITT1-I. • • I LLU9Tfl ON • CONSLILATION - 1 c ,I9d1O €TU C.TO ( c4 CAL-CU i-AT C S WBTA AN MA-O oaI2 /2 -. CCH1 TITM V ODH G -Hric- -M E OFEI L-V AAk \j M,UQL 1 d LLJ )1 ° 1.?,I_11 WI L. Ot ' W rt4 L YO 2- (2 -) 72.- =7 co BS7 TULF. COURT CARLSbAJO CA, szoo . . (Ø) 436' 2L EfI 233 -I3-O 1,o ~i ~ O1Ca aub Z2 MISC LY±J JOST- I/Zll c U4ELU, C Mtsc rrucroRA• Y SfA (wcL (,%Eu..) an : Kpsr CIL 1-0 7 AFAJo 2SC LL = 40p 44. Jsr LL- COrSF .1)tH q,,tAkup*'WQ MOAT. ...f4kicL1.o:. L- A- 20 A •oo 13 4O - L•2ai• FG 1oF_ 9Z32 S-(4--90 lSII C t-Q8cD ~j - itb—W ?ec Is, d12. 0 WM.L i()/ iO4 E i: 1(029103 C Ott' I4(2(o \I4MJ' t(o'tO Dt4C. © cor 1+.(4 \NM- I(1 0 4_eto IIJpu, (%O) S 1.0 %40 I =PG 0 C' Ha! El frM\ 4x10 I4 DF OJML S Jos ei 23 15 UII1 L r W(io). 2.7 (0-410 14 WL2 (Iz W29O 1 4<e2,7 rn29(I!)4= (5"I LL) Z17 I0('2-) = '2.0 Lii M. (4443 Ll~ (= 3o7(itj I(B(b =. M? 243tZ . L4 . 0 Lou t 4XICM0 zDF iE4L. -A k-3L: Z72-2 5 Q 4)ô M0 2. D I4\ Vi S (OrF3)4 c.OHT) IL Ils M. %tiflSt c J12<r 2 d4 SS 2 (I>e,_ 'B Ht9I314 FGS 5-(4--9C) I VO(c. F (B 24(c 40 2 1PF iZ9".>7 4SGS JI±i LIC W4-rLr (06 C,"/) 2ôLC 2K(L' 24-C p..go 2. 2,1 4-tLb #iTiiIk RV so fl pG4. iri L71 M 7':>g:: 4 "~-- e,--, 59 .95"5<4.q,q I i1 Me —4C) - I LM111) I # .t --.. (94 '232.1) ra 4xi0 N0 . OP ..VL N0 1 OF 4XC POSTS 7415 IT1'-0-194- < 6S ol'S &112) S= ..3t .... Pi-N I it_ P&1 wm,s& £@To kk sc:L Wor2r ' Utb?4 Lkes1' VrW 1tTt I 11orsF IPM2 it ol —54 Uo (-(• R 1 V55 'rcr COtT5fr .S47Q 15b em (I __--1.=--- :ii:i: S •II i S Z4 S S cro tins _rIL ir6l I APO, PL4M L S - 5-14-90 L_d4LE&_ L1 (1eu- IZtO 29B0 9 1BO1 ® .IOO 2.7Sb pe> 4O0 134-1 .L 434LS L 4I2o7550 9 79E0 10300 11740 cib3o 10. 3m (~6471) C 1144 2o '9 _________ I-13E tJa tgrupuM 'E A • -, IotooC3- d33 A44 C 2090(.S) = io4c / :TI? ) --• --•• •.•- (O(GW69 (ç)ZcFi0(1)=- 10% Li C O LOWt %t 5-14-90 Ioco(25- 21S ) SF7 4~7 0 <s8o --IkoT .. .. lA15(5) - 0 1 030 ISO .. .. ._ -. 0 _ IL LS\<O •• 4, M (B() I4 P4 - .- e, too(1)=oqo o-..------.--•.•--- • A oC 14I.O ....•. • . I tAr 2Coo (1Z.) 0 <Stj 0 -41, (Q) 19 QLIZ </JS ®- -..- G$ J Oi,'z' SL1t (9) LM 10W 01 --- --------------H Q>t1Q O1i—Yw.. .. Qi~c3 (frOv(..5')OQ Ql*~*hq 3 (\1 -r1 'bin Lp) SV, . OSTA S-:-3 MAL) ) © 1ST FL(&' 740 oD © I I = co "LL 2eir I I - 0 roor t8(Q'o)1 2-6 2-5 11+501 C 3fl" 50 50 SL ct LU (z 4tV\) S.. U) v 30. eq 71444/4 U -f2.: I4446(9( (144+) 77'! - I2J5O M'7 L(O ioo - 4 t'A OLQ 1(9Lsio1b L ff ], X(O 42 Z *0 (K)Or Fk1& côi) Eg jF 4~] - 14J 24p W24I4)%=oOB Rl.,= lcob/-s=~50' 4=077Z* In.( 100b) 14- 11-15"30 3 q çpJ L. io w 1(is 114" BL*fA CtL lB 4; %(ch,C7.:) IZ5O t 4XV 10 Akz 19 OO T90 V! < 13. 50; ieri L0 ee(i-=- (4rL) 10 / 7Ojr.L PI-F- 50 4' I10 00 - OLO- IIE: 4 ___r4COF IbIIJ o(3). 4O 4Mt - c- lu- 4i r-=- .tdt E?)Ia 045 1 cF 30B() 1JW i( () .= Lt #3 ('is) =- 4o1z Few o.6 (2) = ØN\ 4to (40 Ic .It%< 52; SiL 1-OIcPf - 78 &€*M (4to7 / UI3- ..4U4'3z'i.. LJ 104c1 9 zJ +K 10 z i)7MC:) LOor 0 t2L I4(') tiO2 Oe LCY II- FJ 4x12. t x Roo c'thc 2~1 so Y"l 2sw. 1 MAt(2 •'JV cDcrAo kQ rr - Wbs e. ie'fl Z DiD c r -- \NMt )CI4 o(i)i w. cio = =,= II4- cii4a9<3, i'3Mt. i(a' e) = P SSF CO PTG WTcoCB 1 sF .u . ro L 1<t'1OD II II l2.xB cowr- (atom COtkT(t) Low.. MF 01 ku-10 rr@ P 444-17eo 24<3 PG S9'Z 57-11-010 1) Lei SSF Cbs' r-Tra G) Tog) LOP' . (2w, 1 0;) JLL 10 (j3) T( t3ôO)IL5 CCF) TbJ to (e) LOW (8 . ... KW .. tW'N 2 AE LLJJLLi .1 fr, _____ l a9zsls -I5-qo = 0 I QJLL42.3. . ®. . .. .,. ... J 1o9i(.j= 2t1 --.---------,. I((t' 2r / Sri (ti C.ORT) LLPut.ffJ C C Jo1s4(.i) = 1% ' 'bO( I ol) 4.61 I 309 p r <-5to fr,i (BL) - 2474 SZ70 O io ;•+( . 1130 C = osei <0> f2 or co 10c54-( 217 zO('5 - 14A)70 19 -b LF < uw * 3EC04 ruff-- 3(1 Pftl--Ak-NULI~ _- LAW - - - 0 I, TI.. 004 c) IO+() ) 0/ 4+c1 2Sr<SO 229442.70 USE 4 ~11 ;o \OZAJ 311 , \\ Zo),1 °1 0 p) *2091 - 10 fO ç5bo a (VtOT '!'1OC& ZI-60 <se) . PAQj 3 - -. *S-taaS - - • _ - V I V tS ) ztO " ®z-t5t&d =.- 16 1 U grme-o ( Q c K z o - - - L©Q9sO -l I $LANZV _ . LA-1 L, CORT) rO'I - I6i72o c 24q --APO e t4-S<2o . = (4-5 < I u -- -..----. -- -- .- ____ NO r 27u Fw-$T FLOOI2- 'EC 110 © r t'i I s - 4. ® OF (4z) t43((oZ) ISO 91 '3060 WcU (a 2-1 C) a EEE:_~ rccr u-s WA-LL ur rcc \951s(9) -- OOO cJ ok r1IILI1 --I s4j €cco KZY. 5cZ RIC j ROL-fr EEkML1 A) ?'Oe(S 24 +)O 2S(' M03) %, ( 73&3 4xr2_ 4C j \. -y - - -------,-,.,,------------------------ -,--,--,--V---- - V - ? L V V V V tO 5-D (1 1) 57TO it5o ______ __ i;— 4(LL4'U2 fo Tn () (o __ s— t441/5 4-8lfI' fr= 444 _*I 9Co'3E6 M- I(t444) .:VQc Mk 2)(c, Ci rL4 S ((ZOOF r12-MC com) J U34'417ç 2.7( !Z124< 4 EJ. ZXE. •.. AAP C4a 2L3 :jj1j r3b.Bt 50, IL i4j_.. 2 . . _ . S • . ' . z . t,92-3 15 N Fral WAU 10 CE - 6 Z- . ..... .. _1 . . Ti6 I I WIVI .04 .vwE: I TAP. goQ"sf!--- Mo 1150 - itr ___ II ________ zzz - - I - '3273 I VT Iry _______ r r •'-r • ••••• --- '_• .--••; oOT). . aq .. H) -. bArW 2JFb ko 2. . 25. r - 47Oo LGTC I1t _te?__ S.. -- -.----.-.-.--.--.-..r-.-..'- ..-.----.----.--*,..-.--- --5- -. .- --S - ___•'i Y5A . . -7.- 'i iVMV,d4 GPO I07G70 ZL c LIzti io6tO 4 loft CZ 8O . - - - (Z) jo(.zs) nOfl_j U DMA)1. . S d= 38 1 - -5-.- __ 1619 Q (1,02 - -- - -----..SS - c - ••(4 A A 40 ORE ( I ' : !L : ml A • 4 -. - S - _ - 4- a 4 4 - - --- ------- ---.------...-.-. .. .--------.-- _________ 04), :® - = 20 <32S IIIII l M2Z4CL12K8 - MSrfl3 • . C~e!g~? L t 'sac) .w -__-__ (1/3) .19 it 24 12.L__ r 2i23 1p —or IC, D1 L. L0OW 2- ® pOOP 4.7 .00.I41(ro2) 1t2.99 D1 itio) 1(z70):14 0 ?-F z) (so) VV 2o r7Jo9 . UP* c.D r2or WAU, IG,(SO)B/z ((0000 VSM pro 89 25 b fO r5Mku - 141 101 Flo A& book- -- ___ - H ____ 20 IoB+'' 21% a4o ,I. I Lio I1IL _ III I i i Wc ___----. - __6_LZ9 ? vsi . w.t IFi4rr- I (e4TLvp i-*) Luz, Fw I P-MF so 1) fw. mT70(?,5+ % waz 5+.!) t72 4s 449(IZ ft°ZIPF &4 4=- 544,10 W — s C) ~94 (1-xiz) Nti (Ca C)/t. <ISO. — 'zsO— ---------------- -, __— _________ C3 I to Z7Z - :- ?J\ - _____ '315 N 4E2 ___ 724a ½441I,r - I--! [j -- Q tq- 61- 12. 61 --------- - ___ L_ La ----..----- ____ fp-4 tcWr) - 41 CHT) :•. (zt4j 4krdo 7ST • FWD nF. 4Lx4 iSS2- •______________ r4I2 • _______ - W .Sim .i. ________ ______ _____ _____ ____ ___________ T':T :.'f!:;fiH TO tO Vx 77o ______ 1a tro 10610 4 r1Z8Q Tc ___ 1T9 79 aft- L2-7411 CIS &rtOtfl L . 44 419 5 ,-r1kSa I F 1140 .0 .6.55).. gsl lw ru -__-- ---..-._ 4- .7'3 . . ..... so Fil -- Oil m LIT, wIItep I- -#- - AMMAi I'~iillll" INIIII hill'' —u LI Ww m Vow, MOM,- "-~, 'I z ; - d -Iry All - U wina, I Off AM! mAnt fl&WS&. _••_ •• •••_.• _ VSA f . :.. WwW:.,L u Fed-- i.j Mae I t47 2f <Z tvi Saigon msn BRA).tt Z<3 .:)L in _V-1 2.9 1 291. ____-------------- ____-__..1LZ So Ij --uv A, tern Laboratories -WW V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLaren Company April 17, 1990 Work Order 90-819 Horizon Pacific Properties 800 Grand Avenue Suite Al Carlsbad, California 92008 Re: Soils Investigation - Proposed Four, Two-Story Single Family Residences - Located at the Southeast Corner of Las Flores Road and Tuttle Street (Approximately 1.21 Acres), in the City of Carlsbad, California Dear Sirs: At the request of Mr. Ray Escano, a soils investigation was performed at the above reference. The, investigation was partially limited due to existing conditions on the site. The purpose of our investigation was to explore subsurface conditions and to develop preliminary soils engineering design data to permit evaluation of the site with respect to the proposed development. DESCRIPTION OF SITE At the time of our investigation, the property was occupied by a single family residence with parked vehicles, trees and shrubbery. The property is relatively level in overall topography and drainage. is provided by sheet flow. PROPOSED SITE 6EVELOPMENT It is proposed to demolish the existing structures and construct four, two-story single family residences on the site. It is anticipated that timber and stucco will be utilized in construction of the exterior walls of the proposed structure. Maximum anticipated loadings on the order of 2.5 kips/lin.ft. for continuous foundations and 50 kips 'for isolated foundations were utilized for testing and design purposes. If the actual design loadings should exceed these values, this firm should be notified in order that we may review, and if necessary, amend our recommendations. 22301 South Western Avenue, Suite 102, Torrance, CA 90501 (213) 782-9001 - FAX (213) 782-9113 April 17, 1990 Work Order 90-819 FIELD EXPLORATION Six (6) 24-inch wide exploratory test excavations were placed at locations, as shown on the attached plan. The excavations were logged by our Field Engineer and disturbed and undisturbed samples were obtained for laboratory testing and analysis. Logs are shown on Table I. Bulk and relatively undisturbed soil samples were obtained at depths appropriate to the investigation. The soil sampler utilized in our investigation included a 2-3/4 inch inside diameter drive barrel, lined with numerous 1 inch brass rings. The central portion of these ring samples were retained for testing. All samples were immediately sealed in airtight containers and transported to the laboratory. Bulk, remolded, and relatively undisturbed soil samples serve as the basis for the laboratory testing and engineering conclusions contained in the report. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Disturbed top soils, ranging from 1.0 to 1.5 feet below existing grade, were encountered in the excavations. These soils classify as slightly clayey, medium Sand and were low in density (loose) and dry or moist. I The natural ground, as encountered beneath the low density soils, classified as slightly clayey, medium Sand and was noted to be dense and moist or dry. Caving occurred in the cohesionless soils at all depths and ground water was not encountered. No discoloration of soils, odor or tactile trace was noted which might indicate possible contaminates or hazardous materials. LABORATORY TESTS A. Direct Shear Tests (ASTM D-3080) were performed with a strain control type shear machine where the soil samples are subjected to a 0.002 inch per minute rate of strain, under varying loads and under conditions of saturation. The results of these tests are presented on Plates A and B. - 2 - W.U. Western Laboratories VT V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLaron Company I 1 April 17, 1990 Work Order 90-819 I B. Expansion index Tests, in accordance with the require- ments of the Uniform Building Code Standard No. 29-2, were performed on typical specimens of the on-site soils. This I test measures the expansion index of the soils from 50 percent saturation to total saturation under a surcharge of 1.0 pound per square inch for a 24 hour saturation period, or I until the rate of expansion becomes constant. Results of these tests are presented on Table II and reveal the upper soils to be very low in expansion potential. I C. Consolidation Tests (ASTM D-2435) were performed on in- situ moisture and saturated specimens of typical soils. The consolidoineter, like the direct shear machine, is designed to I receive the specimens in the field condition. Porous stones, placed at the top and bottom of the specimens, permit the free flow of water into or from the specimens during testing. I. Successive load increments were applied to the top of the sample and progressive and final settlements under each increment were recorded, to an accuracy of 0.0001 inch. The final settlements so obtained are plotted to create the I consolidation curves presented on Plate C. CONCLUSIONS I Development of the site, as proposed, is considered feasible from a soils engineering standpoint, based upon the I implementation and incorporation of the recommendations which follow into the site preparation, grading and construction of the proposed structure. Furthermore, the proposed on-site building and grading operation will not have an adverse effect on the project site or adjacent properties. All future certified areas of the property, as indicated in I our Supervised Compaction Report (to be submitted at the conclusion of grading operations) will be safe from a soils engineering standpoint from landsliding or slippage I (including surf icial and gross); and proposed structures will not exhibit excessive settlement. Any existing or proposed slopes have not been checked for I. stability. Natural soil conditions on the site are uniform as disclosed I by our test excavations. Conventional spread foundations may be used to support the proposed structure, if the recommendations contained in this report are followed. 1 i Western Laboratories WT I V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLnren Company April 17, 1990 Work Order 907819 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based upon observations made in the field, the results of laboratory tests on samples of the materials encountered, the past experience of this office and similar soils conditions in this general area, and on an overall evaluation of the site conditions. GENERAL GRADING AND COMPACTION All site grading operations should conform to the local building and safety codes and to the rules and regulations of those governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the subject construction. The grading contractor is responsible to notify governmental agencies,' as required, and the Soils Engineer prior to initiating grading operations, and any time grading is resumed after an interruption. All vegetation should be stripped and hauled from the proposed fill areas prior to the start of the grading operations. The existing low density disturbed top soils, as noted in the attached Log of Excavations, are not suitable in their present condition for slab,, structural or pavement support. These soils should be excavated to competent natural ground, as verified by the Soils Engineer, and the underlying supporting soils processed and compacted in-place to a minimum of 90 percent of the laboratory. standard. This should also be performed in cut areas where the natural soils are exposed. The excavated soils should then be cleansed of any root structures and deleterious debris, brought to proper moisture content and replaced, utilizing compaction equipment to a minimum of 90 percent of ASTM D-1557-78 under the direction of the Soils Engineer, in accordance with the attached "Specifications for Compacted Fill Soils". Any proposed import fill soils should be approved by the I . Soils Engineer prior to importing to the site. Any additional fill soils placed should also be. compacted in accordance with the attached "Specifications". I. -4- i'%AIgc$ern Laboratories V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLa,cn Company Laboratories - - - vvtern V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLaron Company I I April 17, 1990 Work Order 90-819 I Once demolition of the existing structures has been completed, an investigation should be performed by the Soils I Engineer to ensure the consistency of soil conditions in the area and to make recommendations for removal and recompaction. Resultant excavations from demolition operations should be cleansed of loose soils and debris and backfilled under the supervision of the Soils Engineer. This backfill should also be compacted in accordance with the attached "Specifications". A diligent search for septic tanks, cesspools or underground I .lines should be performed during grading operations. If any are encountered they should be excavated and backfilled under the supervision of a qualified Soils Engineer. Adequate protection should be provided for adjacent buildings or improvements on adjoining properties during grading operations. Shoring may be required prior to excavation. Any excavation without shoring should be cut at a two horizontal to one vertical slope, to a maximum vertical height of 10.0 feet and adequate safety protections should be provided for any adjacent streets or structures. A visual inspection by a representative of this firm should be performed during the excavation; moisture variations and differences in cohesive characteristics of the soil deposits may require slope flattening or, conversely, permit steepening of the cut at some locations. Temporary construction cut slopes are suitable for short time duration, not to exceed six weeks. All backf ills should be mechanically compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum density obtainable by the ASTM D-1557- 78 method. Jetting or flooding should not be permitted in any trench or wall backfill. Utility trench backf ills should be observed and tested during backfill operations as the work progresses. If the testing of a backfill is performed after completion, without observing the backfill operations, then only the test results at the test locations can be given. -5- April 17, 1990 Work Order 90-819 FOUNDATION AND STRUCTURAL Following completion of the bulk grading operation and compaction testing, the proposed structure should be founded on conventional foundations excavated to a minimum depth of 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade, into competent natural ground or certified fill soils, which will result in an allowable safe bearing capacity value of 1700 lbs./sq.ft. for continuous foundations and 2000 lbs./sq.ft. for isolated foundations. The allowable soil pressures may be increased one-third for combinations of vertical and horizontal forces where permitted by the Uniform Building Code. It should be brought to your attention that it will be necessary to deepen foundations into competent natural ground, if perimeter over-excavation of the low density fill soils (5.0 feet beyond the building perimeter), is not accomplished due to the close proximity of the property line. Where foundations are to be located adjacent to utility trenches, the foundation should extend below a one horizontal to one vertical (1:1) plane projected upward from the inside bottom corner of the utility trench. In designing for lateral loads within the certified areas, a coefficient of friction of 0.4 may be assumed between the slabs-on-grade, the foundations and the compact underlying soils. Compact soils around the foundations may be assumed to develop passive earth pressures equivalent to those pressures exerted by a fluid having a density of 200 lbs./cu.ft. with a maximum of 2500 lbs./sq.ft. In cases where the direction of thrust is towards a slope and the foundation wall is less than 5.0 feet from the face of slope, or the inclination of the slope is steeper than a two horizontal to one vertical (2:1), then the passive resistance should be evaluated by the Soils Engineer. Active earth pressures against retaining walls, placed within the certified area, will be equivalent to the pressure exerted by a fluid having a density of 30 lbs./cu.ft., for granular drained soils, where the slope of the retained material is level and there is no surcharge and the maximum height of the retained material is 20.0 feet. Additional active pressures are given on the attached Table III for utilization in cases where the slope of the retained material is not level. W.Mestern Laboratories V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLarcn Company I I April 17, 1990 Work Order 90-819 Adequate drainage away •from all structures and paved areas should be provided at all times. Building pad and roof drainage should be collected and directed toward appropriate receptacles in non-erosive devices. This and any other appropriate measure should be taken to minimize infiltration of surface water into the pavement and building areas. ' I It is anticipated that all foundations sized for the I recommended soil pressures will experience maximum ultimate settlements on the order of one-half inch with maximum differential settlements not exceeding one-quarter inch. I Due to the granular nature of the upper soils, the majority I. of this settlement is expected to occur during the construction phase, as the loads are placed. CONCRETE SLABS-ON-GRADE If the recommendations contained in this report are followed, floor slabs cast-on-grade can be placed directly upon the certified fill soils, provided import soils of a non- expansive nature are used. While reinforcement of slabs poured-on-grade is not necessary due to soil expansion characteristics, other -factors, such as, structural confinement and temperature changes may require that slabs be reinforced. - These recommendations are based upon the expansion potential of the on-site soils only. The Structural Engineer for the project. may need to address other factors which may require modification of the above recommendations. CLOSURE Findings in this report are valid as of this date; however, changes in conditions of a property can occur due to the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or works of man, on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards occur whether they result from legislation or broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review after a period of one year. -7- Western Laboratories V V Soil and Foundation Engineering /1 McLaien Company April 17, 1990 Work -Order 90-819 The information and recommendations of this report are based upon the assumption that the soil conditions do not deviate from those disclosed in the excavations. If any variations or undesirable conditions are encountered during construction, or if the proposed construction will differ from that planned at the present time, •McLaren Western Laboratories should be notified so that supplemental recommendations can be given. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or of his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are called to. the attention of the Architect and Engineers for the project and incorporated into the plans and that the necessary steps are taken to seeP that the Contractors and Subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. This report is subject to review by the controlling authorities for the project. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. Respectfully submitted, McLAREN WESTERN LABORATORIES Thomas C. Hare R.G.E. 380 -8- Al ....tern Laboratories TV V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLaien Company Work Order 90-819 SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMPACTED FILL PREPARATION The existing fill should be removed under the observation of the Soils Engineer to expose subgrade competent to support the engineered fill. After the foundation for the engineered fill has been exposed, it shall be scarified until it is uniform and free from large clods, moisture conditioned where necessary and compacted to not, less than 90% of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM D-1557-78 (5 layers - 25 blows per layer; 10 lb. hammer - 18 inch drop). MATERIALS On-site materials may be used for the fill, or imported fill I materials shall consist of materials approved by the Soils Engineer, and may be obtained from the excavation of banks, borrow pits or any other approved source. The materials used I should be free -of vegetable matter and other deleterious substances and should not contain rocks or lumps greater than eight inches in maximum dimension. I PLACING, SPREADING AND COMPACTING FILL MATERIALS The selected fill material should be placed in layers I. which when compacted shall not exceed six inches in thickness. Each layer should be spread evenly and thoroughly mixed during the spreading to attain uniformity of material and moisture I of each layer. Where the moisture content of the fill material is below I the limits specified by the Soils Engineer, water should be added. until the moisture content is satisfactory to attain thorough bonding and thorough compaction. Where the moisture content of the fill material is above satisfactory limits, the fill materials should be aerated, blended or dried by other methods until the moisture content I is satisfactory. After each layer has been placed, mixed and spread evenly I it should be compacted to not less than 90% of the maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM D-1557-78 (5 layers - 25 blows per layer; 10 lb. hammer - 18 inch drop) or other density tests which will attain equivalent results. I a a Western Laboratories I V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLaron Company Work Order 90-819 -2- Compaction should be by sheepsfoot roller, multi-wheel pneumatic tire roller or other types of acceptable rollers. Compaction equipment should be of such design that they will be able to compact the fill to the specified density. Compaction should be accomplished while the fill material moisture content is within the compactable range. Compaction of each layer should be accomplished by covering the entire area and the roller should make sufficient trips to attain desired density. The final surface of the lot areas to receive slabs-on-grade should be rolled to a dense, smooth surface. The outside of all fill slopes should be compacted by means of sheepsfoot rollers or other suitable equipment. Compaction operations should be continued until the outer face of the slope is at least 90% compacted. Compacting of the slopes should be done progressively in increments not to exceed 4.0 feet as the fill is brought to grade. Field density tests should be made by the Soils Engineer of the compaction of each layer of fill. Density tests should be made at intervals not to exceed two feet of fill height provided all layers are tested. Where the sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soils may be disturbed to a depth of several inches and density readings should be taken in the compacted material below the disturbed surface. When these readings indicate the density of any layer of fill or portion thereof is below the required 90% density, the particular layer or portion should be reworked until the required density has been obtained. OBSERVATION Observation by the Soils Engineer should be made during all filling and compacting operations so that he can verify that the engineered fill was consistent, competent and in compliance with the recommendations. SEASONAL LIMITATIONS No fill materials should be placed, spread or rolled during unfavorable weather conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy rains, fill operations should not be resumed until the field tests by the Soils Engineer indicate that the moisture content and density of the fill are as previously specified. I I I Western Laboratories V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLwc,, Company Work Order 90-819 STABLE I BORING LOGS Test Excavation 1 0.0 - 1.5 DISTURBED TOP SOILS - Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - loose, dry 1.5 - 7.0 NATURAL GROUND - Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - Brown, dense, moist 7.0 - 11.5 Medium SAND (SP) - Light Brown, dense, moist 11.5 - 17.0 Medium SAND (SP) - Tan/Yellow, dense, moist, moderate caving 17.0 - 20.0 Medium SAND (SP) with gravel - Tan, dense, moist, moderate caving Test Excavation 2 0.0 - 1.5 DISTURBED TOP SOILS - Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) with root structures - loose, dry 1.5 - 6.0 NATURAL GROUND - Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - Brown., dense, dry 6.0 - 10.0 Medium SAND (SP) - Light Brown, dense, moist Test Excavation 3 0.0 - 1.5 DISTURBED TOP SOILS - Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - loose, moist 1.5.- 7.0 NATURAL GROUND - Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - Brown, dense, moist 7.0 - 9.0 Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - Light Brown, dense, moist MET Western Laboratories Y Soil and Foundation Engineering - A McLa,e,i Company Work Order 90-819 TABLE I (Continued) Test Excavation 4 0.0 - 1.5 DISTURBED TOP SOILS - Slightly Clayey, Fine to Medium SAND (SC) - loose, dry 1.5 - 8.0 NATURAL GROUND - Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - Brown, dense, moist Test Excavation 5 0.0 - 1.5 DISTURBED TOP SOILS - Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - dense, moist 1.5 -. 7.0 NATURAL GROUND -slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - Brown, dense, moist Test Excavation4 0.0 - 1.0 DISTURBED TOP SOILS - Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - loose; dry 1.0 '- 8.0 NATURAL GROUND - Slightly Clayey, Medium SAND (SC) - Brown, dense, dry 8.0 - 12.0 Medium SAND (SP) - Brown, dense, moist —v Western Laboratories V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLa,en Company Work Order 90-819 TABLE II EXPANSION TESTS Sample Classification Expansion Index I Slightly Clayèy 14 II Medium SAND 02 III Medium SAND 00 Samples remolded to 50% saturation jWestern Laboratories V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLaren Company Work Order 90-819 TABLEIlI RETAINING STRUCTURES All retaining structures should be designed utilizing the following active pressures. Surface Slope of Retained Material (Horizontal to Vertical) Level 5tol 4 to 1 3tol 2 to 1 Equivalent Fluid Weight Lbs. /Cu.Ft. * 30 32 35 38 43 * These values are for drained soils to a maximum depth of 20.0 feet and are not inclusive of any surcharge which should be taken into consideration in design of the retaining structure. Western Laboratories V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLaren Company 17-Apr-90 Work Order 90-819 PLATE A 40 33 3.0 23 121 2.0 IS 1.0 05 oi l I I I I I 03 1.0 2.0 (ikuxads) Nomiot Slice (psi) TE-4 AT 5.0 FEET Angle of internal friction = Cohesion = R'2 = 03 tO 2.0 3.0 (11iouer4s) Hormol Slice (psi) TE-6 AT 2.0 FEET 32 deg 150 psf 0.991 4.0 30 deg 190 psf 0.979 DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA Prepared for: HORIZON PACIFIC PROPERTIES Western Laboratories V 7 Soil and Foundation Engineering - A McLa,en Company 17-Apr-90 . Work Order 90-819 £23 0.5 - - - - - 0.0 1.0 10 10 (11010011al1) Normal Strom (pal) TE-1 AT 10.0 FEET Angle of internal friction = Cohesion = RA2 = PLATE B 33 deg 60 psf 0.999 1.0 2.0 3.0 (ff01umrals) Normal Strom (pa!) TE-2 AT 14.0 FEET 34 deg 0 psf 0.999 DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA Prepared for: HORIZON PACIFIC PROPERTIES M.—Ir Laboratories TV V V Soil and Foundation Engineering A McLaren Company 17-Apr-90 Work Order 90-819 PLATE C 0 -1 -2 -3 -7 -8 -10 I I I I I I I 0 1 2 3 4 Normal Load (log psi) 0 TE-1 0 4.0' + TE-1 © 10.0' Water added © 1290 psf CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS Prepared for: HORIZON PACIFIC PROPERTIES Western Laboratories V V Soil and Foundation Engineering - A McLawn Company LAS FLORES DRIVE RE MiN 0 M. __- APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF I EXPLORATORY TESTS I I = TEST EXCAVATION Q = BORING F TE: 4-18-90 HORIZON PACIFIC PROPERTIES — — Western Laboratories W Soil and Foundation Engineering I 90- \Y V A McLaren Company CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check No. DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PAIMAS CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 (434-0610) Encinitas Union Elementary 189 Union Street Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4306) San Marcos Unified 270 West San Marcos Blvd. San Marcos, CA 92069 (744-4776) San Dieguito Union High School 710 Encinitas Boulevard Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Project Applicant: 10 JPtldII)2 APN: /5 - - Project Address: ,'//5 jTL€.. C 4,b0,ee3rr3 o& SAvq41oerJ C7 • 76 ?-5 .1 Pe b.7'4ma.'e RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area Number of dwelling units £7/ SQ. FT. of covered area __ SQ. FT. of garage area __ COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL: SQ. FT. AREA Prepared By 'S'5.X41 -)14'4Y- Date ) FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) '-u Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied: $7.2 e63.70 based on sq. ft.@ Comm/Indust Fee Levied: $____________ based on sq. ft.@ Schol District Official Title Date AB 2926 and SB 201 fees are capped at $1.58 per square foot for residential. AB 2926 is capped at $26 per square foot for commercial/industrial. 2075 LAS PALMAS DRIVE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92009-4859 Office of the City Engineer TELEPHONE (619)438-1161 (!J.i1LJ of (JiLithU1LIi1 TO: DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES El FROM: ENGINEERING INSPECTION DIVISION DATE: jc,. o I99/ •. ROUGH GRADING APPROVAL FOR PROJECT NO. 2,io.z S CY 59-3S (P.E. or TRACT #) V;3 6 fl4f /13/ s F(o Dc. 1s (Project Name and Address) t-$ PloV'L, P 0. 8 o4 121& (/.4,I64 . co8 I (Develope'r's Name did Address) We have inspected the grading for Lots /_-k1,- 4-' or Phase of the above mentioned project. In addition, we have received rough grading certification from Dalp. 0 E,!q1 U(05, the Soils Engineer, dated Jp. , and from A J. (Al1 j/ the Supervision Grading Engineer, dated ro6. 1_9,91 ,..and are satisfied that the rough grading has been completed in accordance with City Standards. Based on these.certifications and our observation, we take no exception to the issuance of a building permit for Lots I 4 or Phase • of project EIO - 35 from a grading standpoint. This release, however, is not intended to certify the project from other engineering concerns including site development, water or sewer availa- bility, or final grading. We will need to be advised prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy so that we can verify that final grading and landscaping has been completed in accordance with the approved plans for the project. APPROVED: Z-1~ Project Grading Inspector S Sr. Construction Inspector REC'D F CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 438•5621 k12vi 0161 C (4'A 3YlA2A 4 ,'-o jjçij ACCOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT RECEIPT NO. 101705 TOTAL c— DEC 07 1990 CITY OF CARLSBAD DEVELOP PROC. .S.ERV. DIV. Or wae to (e b-F- -4ke -JO cuoV( -S CGVV0 /j-cOv rzovl I L DVOe Nimakc a4id cti h1 p ro3 e c,+.~ -m R ROs41 1 ca. 'LO, v,o+ recporL v'j-kt" e'her of RcA de, e4i Y4¼1 llhIURS MIIII CONSTRUCTION COMPANY' LICENSED • BONDED • INSURED Lc. No. 557994 619/720-1050 RES 619 I 439-2390 RAY SANTA MARIA PAGER 619 I 967-5749 tj \JS'[Pc ST MOD mp~ 1~- IVT--V~ q [vi1Q 4W(( hn.es, 1.76O \ T' ccc6Acrw gel DjCE CPc6A sivi l(e fmmc(~' knqAL 'ai $a'r1 'WLoi oV¼.iflcr RW1 C clQy Cri1 BUILDING PERMIT PCR No: PCR91032 Project No: A9001210 Development No: Fl: Ste: 10/01/91 07:49 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2415 TUTTLE ST Permit Type: PLAN CHECK REVISION Parcel No: Valuation: 0 Construction Type: NEW Occupancy Group: Description: REVISED STAIRWAY Appl/Ownr : MAUDLIN, LYNN V 1857 TULE CT CARLSBAD, CA 92009 Str: Class Code: Status: APPROVED Applied: 05/15/91 Apr/Issue: 05/15/91 Validated By: RS 619-438-2110 *** Fees Required *** Fees Collected & Credits ---------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Fees: 55.00 Adjustments: .00 Total Credits: .00 Total Fees: 55.00 Total Payments: .00 Balance Due: 55.00. Fee description Units Fee/Unit Ext fee Data --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Plan Check Revision Fee > 55.00 55.00 Si;Ji FøI1is' October 1, 1991 Lynn V Maudlin 1857 Tule Ct Carlsbad, Ca 92009 PLANCHECK REVISION 91032 2415 Tuttle St On May 15, 1991, the above plancheck revision for a stairway was approved. The transaction was never completed because you never picked up your approved plan. The amount due the City is $55. Please send us your check in this amount, mk-ing reference to the subject number, and we will mail you i?) copy of the approved plan. The building has been finalled, but we need to complete this revision close the permit process on the building. 7 C CARTER DARNELL 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009 • (619) 438-1161 PERMIT APPLICATION City of Carlsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 1. PERMIT TYPE I A - COMMERCIAL ONEW DTENANT IMPROVEMENT B [:]INDUSTRIAL []NEW DTENANT IMPROVEMENT C - ESIDENTIAL [3 APARTMENT DCONDO [-]SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 0 DUPLEX DDEMOLIIION DRELOCATION DMOBILE HOME DELECTRICAL - - DMECHANICAL []POOL DSPA []RETAINING WALL DJ ,OTHE ng (ST. VAL PLAN CE DEPOSIT_____________________________ VALID. BY DATE IUM1flLICKfll UN OPLUMBING 4LM3 E Pew 01 S/ 0 xl/ Nearest Cross Streets £12 Energy CaLcs 02 Structural Catcs 2 Soils Report L]I Addressed Envelope ASSESSOR'S PARCEL YI1 I C= I ( % EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE BLDGO.FTG L' -EM Th (U3 OF STORIES 3. CONTACT PERSON NAME Lt1t Mutui ADDRESS 1JL. tt, CITY CULOW. STATE ,4ç ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE 4_% SIGNATURE ?.J APPLICANT% OCONTRACTOR DAGENT FOR CONTRACTOR DOWNER AGENT FOR OWNER NAME çcJ,ff #cc' 43 ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE PROP RTY OWNER OWNER OLESSEE OTENANT NAME IFL Pe _C_PckJT ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE CONTRACTOR NAME LIH Cc't,'r ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE STATE LIC. A LICENSE CLASS CITY BUSINESS LIC. A SIGNATURE TITLE DATE DESIGNER NAME (,,t4J4 I4A' Pt,.k4.j ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE STATE LIC. NC_tu_gz WORKERS' COMPENSATION Workers' Compensation DecLaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent to self-insure issued by the Director of Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. Q. INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. EXPIRATION DATE Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California. SIGNATURE DATE OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for the following reason: 0 I as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon,, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). E] I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7064, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). 0 I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars (S5001). SIGNATURE DATE COMPLETE THIS SECTION FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMITS ONLY: Is the applicant or future building occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYES ONo Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES DNa Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES ONO IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT. CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(i) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shalt expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 180 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any time after the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code). 'S SIG NURE J DOWNER flCONTRACTOR DBY PHONE APPROVED BY; DATE: WHITE: File YELLOW: Applicant PINK: Finance ESGIL. CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 -T17 A DATE: URISDICTIO JURISDICTION: C5ct- CA, 6&cL flFILE COPY PLAN CHECK NO: O_lt(SET:(.) -. . DESIGNER PROJECT ADDRESS:. C)4 V5 TTrt.. PROJECT NAME: _(.4_Cjs7, The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply El with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified are resolved and .. checked by building. department staff. D, The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies -. • identified on the .enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. fl The check list transmitted.herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected plans are submitted for recheck.. fl The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the Jurisdiction to return to the applicantcontact person. D Tie applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person that plan check has been completed. [j Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted:_______________________ Date contacted: Telephone + REMARKS: () b Ws P(a • By: &d..ce. Enclosures: ES.GIL CORPORATION Ico 1 GA AA U RN U DM Date Jurisdiction CsAA - Prepared byi El Bldg. Dept. VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE s g i 1 PLAN CHECK NO._ c_o-u BUILDING ADDRESS - APPLICANT/CONTACT PHONE NO. _ b BUILDING OCCUPANCY - DESIGNER PHONE - TYPE.ÔFCONSTRUCTIOW - CONTRACTOR PHONE__________ BUILDING PORTION -BUILDING AB-EA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE (4/Jp. 4'4• .1 . cA1) •z.:.3 - _________ _______________ Air Conditioni.nE Conmercial• - Residential - Res. or Comm. Fire Sprinklers Tota). Value Bj1djn0 Permit Fee S__ Plan Check Fee COHUCPITS? SHE.ET .(1.PF_____