Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1831 VALENCIA AVE; ; 82-123-3; PermitI hereby affirm that I have a certificate of consent I self-insure, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance, or a certified copy thereof (Sec. 3800, Labor Code). POLICY NO. \ I\ COMPANY UiJT_ \j opy is filed wd t&I ki 0 Certified copy is hereby furnished. CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE - (This section need not be completed it the permit 159 is for one hundred dollars ($100) or less) 19 0 I certify that in the performance of the work for '0 which this permit is issued. I shall not employ any -person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compensation Laws of California NOTICE TO APPLICANT: If, alter making this Certi- ficate of Exemption, you should become subject to the Workers' Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked 0 I hereby affirm that there is a construction __iending agency for the performance of the work for Bich this permit is issued ISec 3097. Civil Code) WI -Lender s Name ___________________________ _jI L Lender's Address USE BALL POINT PEN ON..& PRESS HARD -. APPLICANT TO FILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AP4ECLARATIONS. t p5' f CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION & PERMIT 1200 Elm, Carlsbad, California 92008 (114) 438-5525 .108 DRESS AV. ST. DATE AP*L BUSINESS LICENSE # ,SIy A Ro7,/,/ OWNER'S NAME OWNERS PHONE PRIME CONTRACTOR CONTRACTORS PHONE a L R. PAArni 7O? F 7?-7 ?// It-lb / ?N, ALUATION .g'07 PERMIT NUM8ER Z-Jz3- ZONE OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS PJ9, 13.0d 1/7 C1QAL Al) cA O. CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS R &,, ii3 n/USR4E' LICENSE NO. 7fl#! 7 -? PLAN I.D. # /1 BLDG USE CODE LOT 3J I BLOCK Lu,4 I SUBOI'VISION A f'ivT1Qi4 I ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. JoiOC-0O DESIGNER __- .S',4r'i STATE LICENSE # 161 It 96- STANDARD PLAN# BUILDING SO F TAGE. DESCRIPTION OF WORK 2iric L1 PA-hilLy L,JLLi 1 - R..F V" 101 ! DESIGNERSADORESS DESIGNER'S PHONE 7/O/22O ' i98io6 aoo "7i0e/ 625 00 Not Valid Unless Machine Certified - - ________ C7 914 so I F/P FLRELEV,I vOteD I NO STO7ES tGP - EDU $1T. aA,?4,-- /)7 RZ CENSUS TRACT GP LAND USE NC SPACE RES UNITS NG PERMIT ISSUED GRADING y o ND I REDEVELOPMENT AREA I vO NO I 0CC LOAD FIRE SPR YD NO QTY. PLUMBING PERMIT - ISSUE OTY. MECHANICAL PERMIT. ISSUE . SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER - ..-J BUILDING EACH FIXTURE TRAP ..I INSTALL FURN. DUCTS UP TO 100.000 BTU PERMIT 01-000-4220 4- EACH BUILDING SEWER , OVER 100,000 BTU . SIGN PERMIT 01-000-4221 --I rEACH WATER HEATER AND/OR VENT 7,,. BOILER/COMPRESSOR UP TO 3 HP . PLAN CHECK 01-000-4806 EACH GAS SYSTEM 1 TO 4 OUTLETS BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3.15 HP . TOTAL PLUMBING 01-000-4222 EACH GAS SYSTEM 5 OR MORE . METAL FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL 01-000-4223 EACH INSTAL., ALTER. REPAIR WATER PIPE - — VENT FAN SINGLE DUCT . MECHANICAL 01-000-4224 EACH VACUUM BREAKER . MECH EXHAUST - HOOD/DUCTS MOBILEHOME 01-000-4225 WATER SOFTNER . RELOCATION OF EA FURNACE/HEATER MOBILEHOME PARK INSP EACH ROOF DRAIN (INSIDE) . SOLAR 01-000-4226 - TOTAL MECHANICAL STRONG MOTION 65-640-0519 4.1. TOTAL PLUMBING FIRE SPRINKLERS - 01-000-4227 OTY. . ELECTRICAL PERMIT - ISSUE - tk OTY. - SOLAR-ISSUE - PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 25-000-4933 BRIDGE FEE NEW.CONST EA AMP/SWTIBKR //Jô . COLLECTORS - SCHOOL FEE - DISTRICT 1 PH - 3 PH ' STORAGE TANKS . Carlsbad 65-623-0519 - EXIST BLDG EA AMP/SWT/BKR ROCK STORAGE '- - Encinitas 65-624-0519 1 PH - 3 PH . PUMP . San Dieguito . 65-625-0519 REMODEL/ALTER PER CIRCUIT - PLAN CHECK FEE . San Marcos 65-626-0519 OVER 200 AMPS . TEMP POLE 200 AMPS - TEMP OCCUPANCY (30 DAYS) TOTAL ELECTRICAL - 7 TOTAL SOLAR TOTAL FEES PAYABLE J A 0 " AND DO HEREBY I Expiration. Every permit issued by the 6ing fficiai uho provisions ofthis * AN OSHA PERMIT REQUIRED FOR EXCAVATIONS OVER HAVE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED "APPLICATION AND PERMIT A CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE I Code shall expire by limitation and bme null aod45i. If the building or work 5•0" DEEP AND DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION OF DECLARATIONS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT AND I FURTHER-CERTIFY AND AGREE IF A PERMIT IS authorized by such permit is not cp.mencq,awitIf 180ysfrorn the date of such permit, or if the build g,gc..t4Nt- a ad by ermit is suspended ISSUED: TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY, COUNTY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING atert_w_is_commenc r _eriod_of_180 days. KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES. or STRUCTURES OVER 3 STORIES IN HEIGHT STRUCTION, WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. I ALSO AGREE TO SA URE 0 CONTRACTOR APPROVE BY DA EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUEN BY PHONE 0 GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT. 0 I h.re•flrm that I am licensed under o provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with I- r' Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and my license Is In I full force and effect. I-I Z 1..., Lic. No. --Class 0 U I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the. Con-tractor's License Law for the following reason (Sec. 7031 5 Business and Professions Code: Any city or county which requires a permit to construct alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure. prior to its issuance also requires the applicant for Such permit to tile a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Con-tractor's License Law (Chapter 9 commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Pro- fessions Code) or that is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by an applicant for a permit subjects me applicant to a Civil penalty of not more than five hundred dollars ($500). E] I. as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole Compensation, will do the work, and the Structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professiotis Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intende'i or offered for sale. If however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the properly, am exclusively co tracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Cdde: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for each projects with a contractor(s) license pursuant to the Contractor's 'License Law). - D lam exempt under Sec. — . B. & P.C. for this reason 0 0 a, C1. U) C a IPJPTIflM TVPF DATE INSPECTOR ____ BUILDING 1 . UNDATION 5tø O.* 11 , i . - g REINFORCED STEEL MASONRY GUNITE OR GROUT FLOOR & CEILING SUB FRAME SHEATHING c3•t18Z _________ FRAME EXTERIOR LATH INSULATION g •7Ø ( INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL PLUMBING SEWER AND BL/CO 92 zi6 PLUMBING UNDERGROUND PLUMBING TOP OUT TUB AND SHOWER PAN GAS TEST ELECTRICAL VA TEMPORARY POWER ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND ROUGH ELECTRIC I ELECTRIC SERVICE I BONDING G. F. I. - SMOKE DETECTOR I MECHANICAL DUCT & PLEM., REF. PIPING g.Z.l-8Z. C4j HEAT - AIR COND. - SOLAR SYSTEMS VENTILATING SYSTEMS CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHEN ALL APPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN APPROVED. JOB SITE FINAL PLUMBING ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL GAS BUILDING Yô2, Q SPECIAL CONDITIONS CERT OF OCCjINCY ISSUED ). w - - FIELD INSPECTION RECORD REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS . INSPECTOR'S NOTES INSPECTION REO. IF INSPECTOR'S c<o DATE WrlutjcbI 4S•,JZ - SOILS COMPLIANCE PRIORTO - - FOUNDATION INSP STRUCTURAL CONCRETE OVER 2000 PSI PRESTRESSED CONCRETE POST TENSIONED CONCRETE FIELDWELOING - HIGH STRENGTH - — -BOLTS SPECIAL MASONRY PILES 'CA ISSONS - ft r23 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CONNECT TO CITY SEWER SYSTEM' CITY OF CARLSBAD VT? SE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT A 438.5541 FOR APPLICANT TO FILL IN ISSUED BY DATE ISSUED BUILDING ir1 /A 1 rIC11 ADDRESS (V I VALIDiION OWNER yj, o .. U MAILING - CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS I NEWBUILDIG, I - EXISTING BUILDING LEGAL DESCRIPTION v& REMARKS: LINE.COSTDATA 3 gO 3 / -• ASSESSMENT 01ST. NO. FRONTAGE COST PER FT. _______TOTAL_______ OTHER LATERAL LOCATION 1 • ••• ST. INSTALLATION DATE- CONNECTION FEE / _____ • Ik NO. UNITS COST PER UNIT TOTAL PUMP STATION FEES NO. UNITS COST PER UNIT-TOTAL- LATERA TOTAL CHARGES (LATERAL ETC.) WHITE:, Engineering GREEN Finance YELLOW Sanitation PINK Building GOLDENROD Permitter LATERAL CHARGE COMPUTATION 46o STANDARD 4" (Max. H. 30', V. 10') OVER 30'H. __ ______FT._________________ OVER 10'V. _____ ______FT. _____ STANDARD 6" (Max. H. 30', V. 10') OVER 30' H. FT.___________________ OVER 10'V. _____ ______ FT.__________________ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST e SERVICE CHARGE (REPAVING ETC.) - • TOTAL LATERAL CHARGE ESGIL CORPORATION 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 122 SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (714) £60-1465 ,, , Datea_1I-279l Jurisdiction CA 92-S 96D Prepared byt j VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE 0 Bldg. Dept. P r-7:54 /I PLAN CHECK NO. 82-17-'3 BUILDING ADDRESS - VA kEVc,A A (i...ô -r ) APPLICANT/CONTACT PHONE NO.________________ BUILDING OCCUPANCY -3/-i./ DESIGNER PHONE___________ TYPE Of CONSTRUCTION - V - Al CONTRACTOR PHONE___________(COWST BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION MULTIPLIER VALUE 9t.f All 73 3141 Air Conditioning Commercial Residential Fire Sprinklers Total Value 61 2.07 Building Permit Fee 37, Plan Check Fee C OMMTSPLA A.1 Y 01 --B EJ APPLICANT COPY CITY _COPY~ C]-PLAN CHECKER COPY '7 a) hi iJa ce54 e• ___ /-27 O# 8Z4if 277L e4 7441)€4 j4s .30 - fltvi tie L%, I (47 Oi l -- ___ ('VL'/z oe-M,( C.1vi9ffe) 2I-cn &WV pa4w0e ale ijd.'k :. ,ci/'f'12n,i1_ VwWhe 4e gca lile~• .-. et-çj blee .'z -(-,''ss ccc f. S 1&45ci; 0114 fr7e0leS C&IC-5 elwaln oeaz 'S • ?afcs -/Lsz /fr7/7 5,d2ati c_7ft7e_iioo P_lo cc..( ___ 1Q 4r2Q/a.0 () v7 tiu9 Si'b 'ii, ,'e4 p/cz44. ___ ô e.. -z- /P be p.oi S/v A-4 d f&zu/3 -- c.) cpw,, ci4:ic// Ala 6 e€ iii Citp of Car1bab C14'014Q1 S/i,1i0s9121' S*',1e i2i 011e,'- 5/'G)'7 mv. 4is4'.ec. g/Q41e9e 30-I, 3.i - JURISDICTION: DATE_________ PPOJECT ADDRESS:______________________________ TO: i cqivf 2. - PLAN CORRECTION SI4ECT 7 \ 5- Plan Chock No. L plans received by jurisdiction______________ )atc plans received by plan checkerm/2t4'L. Date initial plan check com1eted?li ?bl() FAREW('RDz PLEASE READ Plan check is limited to technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code. Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the handicapped. The plan check is based on regulations enforced by the Building Inspection Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The items circled below need clarification, eod&fication or change. ALL circled items have tc be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1979 Uniform Building Code. the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. A. PLANS Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints, / and any original plan sets that may have been returned to you by the jurisdiction, tG: _ •eç f;€,P,Q4d- 2 To facilitate rechecking, please identify, n ext to each circled item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this check shet with the revised plans. PLAN . lILa. OWNER DATE }U..'o DATE CHECKED CHECKED BY -Lih//f fr29wcg4J C44J c/2f, ~ ... f2 o, b/'Aif p/etC?d2 -ti eiiy if2O'c& hca1e€ S'& #i 1vi 4 'O/'.O/1U4' 'JLIL7 Oee/Q, jII 3' fl2L42 24-zt ii,e Ci9/tice c//fj...4ie_Sci -S ill ee' __ •i-4t 1qjecf. i.' _______ Q1c I Q. zioi- iv -%e_C14 -________ ,' q2 s1 - •Shav4D ys-' 4 /c'2 WIJI4iy7 ic? c&.S/cpe - '-die R,49 7°fl' Y7 s4-p .hii Js p/v,q1 e,z , i eee shaac.' /a/i 7• .hoc,' € . I eL fti'a Se ivg,ncL Y-?ef 77/ s/cg S 5/?7 ,',is Iz "z1 fit) (e ,9-7-- 7/# •')ci (7 7 117 Sp Fc&4Jw7 /2(44! 'ZL= 10 'Wi 1q, /ciike4 cLj Ca V /t44 . v----•-. _____ ____ I,e fl8i b'et LV'2? t42 d1ii%i J c 'e /Zcpc ' 4 ti-i c7S pJ- SJ,ciwe/. c_tø,_;_ ç• - 1L1/ ê4 /7ya4i)1et ________ • . I, /1 4, Cez 7, •7) ,vS 2i). 5n T/ !-44_c/L4j 1i.;r . hL.l. .. DATE HI.'v - DATE CHECKED CHECKED BY copc IL'o 1Q C41 ett5..fr _' t'1S. /(X) _"i" Cej',7.e7 ,é r JiLl 4iZ as &' ti ' I'll- ,01,16-4101. 569ô .:-74,1-6,- ____ ,4r /:c# ,-,z?c.,'- (-"t/._- - aw . c/i .A?4c21a'i iq '-Z /4" O.• c4 iALde 8'kt )-7d& :s7,/2 /2,a'/s Al 9 Ma C17 e4 ?&.. 1- /1Jiu7 i'iA',, 1L -7_(7/'LL50."/'8. • 1- ---- -- . I -. -- -- - . - . -- -- -------- ..-.-. - 9. . INTERDEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION SHEET L4G DEPARTMENT /t3' E: BUILDING ADDRESS: ZIONE LOT SIZE LOT WIDTIC . t4NITS ALLOWED UNITS PROVIDED J_ PARKING SPACES REQUIRED PROVIDED_______________________ % COVERAGE ALLOWED 'J7C) PROVIDED _______________ BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED 3 PROVIDED FRONT SETBACK: SIDE SETBACK: REAR SETBACK: ALLOWED PROVIDED_____________ INTRUSIONS LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION PLAN COMMENTS: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REQ: EiAiI,L ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: OK TO ISSUE: W\ DATE 1/tcOK TO FINAL DATE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT R.O.W. INDUSTRIAL WASTE __IMPROVEMENTS______________ SEWER CONNECTION DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS GRADING PERMIT EASEMENTS It YIO A T?TAI' LEGAL DESCRIPTION ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OK TO ISSUE DATE_______ FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLING SYSTEM / FIRE .LARMS FIRE HYDRANTS______ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FIRE PROTECTIONEQUIP. EXITS I.. LOCATION OK TO ISSUE: DATE OK TO FINAL DATE WATERDEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS OF APPROPRIATE DISTRICTS MET DATE .j_ • - BRIAN SMITH ENGINEERS, INC. Client: KAMAR CONSTRUCTION 2656 State Street CO. INC. Carlsbad, CA 92008 325 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Le Job No. 5112 E. Brian Smith RCE 13817 May 18, 1982 EBS:gh SHEET 1 OF 10 Structural calculations for House Plan 101, using tile roof. tOFLo )ERTICPL WAD 31SS QOOP LOAD. 5 2.o ps+ 'truss '3.0psf insutqlicwi %.O psi- 5.,5 psf t,L. O P54- L. I (P-0 35.0 051 TRUSS IDESIGW AMC c -ncs lb 6E roRsHet By i) \%oER (t'rt1 Bt eni I)O.2 F-L eeoc ps4- 420 lb/c-i- header es -. 9 - 42.I1O/fP- Q) Bendinq 1'A -4 Zb ". r'p % I qZG 4-lb 0 8 T'( 1'8 I 26 753 Ps I 3O1 actj Fb tabcb I. L.D.F.1C.UIF. adiFo I25 o 1.25 IO 5Gp TR'? "ops t1.(95 :. OK shect (•5 8 P = -b F i . LO F 1CVF cjÔ Fg 83 = tQ6S 4yadjFv i tOO .itc she otc óe4aiior -L .6' o 0%. • - .tBo d bectcucj Iev\4-r\ Lb= I 284 Ib 7 (o' 4O' M PT. tO L v Sfi v - io.z or-L 7(, •i 3 I 4, 2) 3p0r 10' (Rk1 00c load = 17.42 ' 35 Ib/4 b ib/ft-. 1461'iOEQ EsT. :9 tb/ci-. 'I8 %b/-f-t TRY 1')U2'HDQ C4) Berdr.cj t4 GIB 16L -77z5 4. Ib -77zs Y. lV I2.5 fcLbFb = 12S0 o4.Fb = +*bFb '1LP. o&j Fb:: 1250 Y.. t.ZS 11.0 = 5(o 4b . 4d F b u0a berdi_______ Shear ___ I - . - giq p SI aj Pq q5 1125Y t:O I1 F P I., EET oir 2. ccxvi-. ci) beairj (nn I'vt+h' - 3OO b FCL 3539St2.5 - : " IL" 4 DR V, tci A3 Ler+ = 2.0 " 3.) 5P1J 6'-66"' (EnR.'' PORCH) f?oop LOAD (o I e I b / .+ TRY I6' -OR () 5-endinq tA 32G4-c4Ib -lb 277 f)3 , . ber1 0 30, (ol çb b) 5heqr 4_Y i.5L L.S i(.5'-L)bl8I') 5p aS.3J5 -\ Si,-jk 1. z= Iops i4YZEV 1( 3. CoM (o" oc) cc) (Y"iv' brj R ao%otbs Lb - 385 htS - 1.2" 'S 05E 4 18 V4 01Z mr 1,2" 4) S PAM !(O ' C 6i k') TY (b 1I2 -U) D.L. IS R- Ic,cJ = 1/A2 '$ 31 psc- = 540 ,jc) 552. wJf-. & Bendin ¶52' r71cc0s44.lb 4b Iz2_6 74qqfj - ry ,1I4 I4R Ci' erdirw M I7,(.5 r1,iD5fl7-. I 70 brr OK = I90 psi I,) sea -- l.5- J( 55) _765 74 Ri 5iJ2$ tOt, 93 5hr oK- SHEET .1 OF 10 L47-E PAL Lou To 8LO. I to e AREA (D I _JLI8" H N AREA : wt. ("Of 24 /9 = 7752 lb. 4; )( 50 1(0 3 2.00 %b. 10, qZ. 1b. imic /-c4O 0.140(/o,q52) 2O4o/b. AEE,4 w+. ('00f /8.67 X 4Z.S' f9f5+ /5074, (b. $ 3.33 ,' 3783 Y'/91054 2.270lb. (44• Yzei1-w alls = 41.!67f(9 lO(o9O(b. ifl+ 'jQI'S O(o . /0 8240 Ib Co 2276 lb. 11,583 /b. 5t.iT 10 /-/1TEPJL Loiios IA) Al-S O,pezT1oij @ JQCOF Li.jE 5E//fl'C TbTAL = 2040 + //553 = /3[23/b5. Il(000 lbs. .1: 5f51fl/(_ G0U€iS SPGA 70 L4J/tLL V - 3.G23) = Cb812 lb-5 2 / Leijth of 5hMr 2cne1$ +433 .. 3,(,7'-+ . co 8/2.1ã.,. /55/b/ft .44 , Use: 5*'&o Per U,6.C. 7oL '97 -T 41/0L. if':: ie014*- 3/EQ To WA-LL - v 2P 40 = Io7_o /b.5. '2. LeMTh 4 S hMr panels = 5. S -1-4.0 I07 /b/.c, Us c Stucco Per U. IS. ( Tcible 47-1 5tj&Ai2 ro ® V = 5792. lbs. L€nfh 4 Shr Panels = 2.S' 12.o' +2.33'+I1,I7' S 1/ 679 lb 207/b,4t I USE /8" TdcCo oyR PA Pa SACKED LATH v/1 StAPi.E Q 3"O.C. 4.T TOP ALjo 60Trom -!i1. El6E 01= 544Q '4Y4.1 oLct CL. t'4ow Shr ... o Io LATEPJL Loam /At 0iea770,v €: RooF Lw ñ D S'1nic = 13i23 Ibs > Wii'J1 5H9 To ("#UL V -'3- (.) - 23 I lb Len0fh o-f 5hthr fineI5 St5' 13' V 23/I!bs - 1 7 7 I bI.c+, use StoccoPee O.G,C.TML.€ 47-z 4Ifr., Vz /-iAR 7D WALL® V 2311 f 65 = 4500 1b5. L-en1-h she" pcfvl€)S - S'f167' 40' -t 3,33': /7 ' -y 4500 lb a 2G5 tb/ft. os: 7i" STUCCO OVEV PsPEr 6&te0 LATH SrAPL&S Q 3" O.C. At ivP gJI Tr.rr Pi..wi- AIUO QF ME1 %VPrLLS 1 (o"O.., IEL..O jjôj 5kneTowAu.© V "' z792Jb z. •1• Lflno4h o Vv Ftmel3 4o7 t 4.5 't ,,33'f 3,5 /'Q 3G2Ib/f4 U5 1R" PL'(''O. &UC1U*L jr &4 LkXiS€ 4'O,C. /PJD iZO.C. PI8L ThiLE 25K 06C. SimP5otJ ',-23 HW-Doujpjs. ,r eAc1 ENO <L-L ki&./T I -. C-meck 03 V= 32 Ib/4+. 2 Ibg+ (o2 tb/44 .33' IZo( Ib e 3,! ¼rM(0 4 2(g5 W.. 44j = , I8COw') '7q lb. O.T.W,11-71)t (& izoj 340.LI vom : f I(i7(55.2,t3!)]: iTMorA. = NET UPUFT 14 IOS. L 1-4 ow 14w oi MOM f)L MOM IJ& Mom UtT fJOiir- 3 I— p cicc,1 2B 3 (o I 140 lbs 6im4 sow P11- 3'-" 54' 83 101 048 3Z1 14 204I9 O I032 51G,3 7S8 riic I, 1 59.1 J ill iC04 S55 84I to2. PI-23 W 4 LL OW 133100= 3,q Ibs.. 3467 Kurtz Street San Diego. California 92110 Woodward-Clyde Consftants 714-224-2911 May 14, 1982 Project No. 511011-FC01 Kamar Construction Company, Inc. 325 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Jerry Rombotis ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS LAGUNA RIVIERA UNIT 11 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Gentlemen: As you requested, this letter presents. our supplemental recom- mendations for the subject site. A report entitled "Soil and Geological Investigation for the Proposed Laguna Riviera, Unit No. 11, Carlsbad, California," was issued by our firm dated February 23, 1981. A "Final Report of Engineering Observation of Grading and Testing of Compacted Fill, Laguna Riviera Unit No. 11, Lots 1 through 7 and Offsite Fill (Carlsbad Tract 80-39), Carlsbad, California," was issued by our firm dated October 15, 1981, revised October 28, 1981. The purpose of this letter is to supplement the recommendations in the above- mentioned reports regarding footings near slopes and utility,. trenches below footings. Footings Near Slopes In our two previous reports, we recommended that footings that are located within 8 feet of the top of a slope, be extended in depth until the outer bottom edge of the footing is .8 feet horizontally from the outside face of the slope. We have reviewed undated plans entitled "Plot & Grading Plan, Laguna Riviera Unit No. 11-CT-80," (scale 1" = 301 ).. Our review indicates that Pads No. 1 through 7 at the site gener- ally include 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) cut or fill slopes of 'less than 5 feet in maximum height near the proposed struc- tures. For, slopes of maximum height less than 5 feet and maximum inclinations of 2:1 or flatter, we recommend that the required minimum clear distance between 'the footing edge and the slope face be reduced from 8 feet to 5 feet., Consulting Engineers. Geologists and Environmental Scientists Offices in Other Principal Cities •', Kamar Construction Company, Inc. May 14, 1982 Project No. 511011-FCO1L, Page 2 Woodward-Clyde Consultants Utilities Below Footings We understand that utility trenches on the order of 18 to 24 inches in depth cross the bottoms of several, continuous footings at the site. In lieu of backUll and testing in these areas, werecmmend that, for a horizontal distance of at least 5 feet on either side of the footing edges, the lower part of the trenches be backfilled with clean coarse sand or pea gravel and flooded into place. We recommend that all such trenches be properly. backfilled with at least 6 inches of native nonex- pansive soil at the top. We recommend that all footings crossing utility trenches be reinforced top and bottom with at least one No. 4 rebar. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Very truly yours, WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS Ad6~011044 Richard P. While R.E. 21992 RPW/JN/eej (2) 3467 Kurtz Street San Diego. California 92110 714-224-2911 '1 Woodward-Clyde Consultants October 15, 1981 Revised: October 28, 1981 Project No. 511011-FC01 Kamar Construction Company, Inc. 325 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Attention: Mr. Jerry Rombotis FINAL REPORT OF ENGINEERING OBSERVATION OF GRADING AND TESTING OF COMPACTED FILL LAGUNA RIVIERA UNIT NO. 11 LOTS 1 THROUGH 7 AND OFFSITE FILL (CARLSBAD TRACT 80-39) CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA Gentlemen: In accordance with your request, we have provided engineering services in conjunction with the grading of the subject site. SCOPE OF WORK Our services included: Providing engineering observation of the grading operation Performing field density tests in the placed and compacted fill Performing laboratory tests on representative samples of the material used for fill Observing the removal and recompaction of loose fill and surface soils where encountered prior to placing additional fill Observing the removal of potentially expansive soils, where encountered, from lot grade Providing professional opinions regarding the con- tractor's general adherence to plans and specifica- tions. Consulting Engineers. Geologists and Environmeritl Scientust Offices in Other Principal Cities qW Kamár Construction Company, Inc. October 15, 1981 Revised: October 28, 1981 Project No. 511011-FC01 Page Woodward-Clyde Consultants SUMMARY OF GENERAL EARTHWORK AND TESTING Site preparation, compaction, and testing were done between September 8 and September 18, 1981. In our opinion, based on our observation and testing, the work performed during that period was in general conformance with the Specifications for Controlled Fill attached to our report entitled "Soil and Geological Investigation for the Proposed Laguna Riviera, Unit No. 11, Carlsbad, California," dated February 23, 1981. Previous grading of the subject site was completed between January 6 and January 24, 1972. That grading consisted of fill placed and compacted in the area of Lots 1 and 2 from grading in adjacent Laguna Riviera units. That work is sum- marized in the Woodward-Gizienski & Associates report dated April 5, 1972. During the current grading period, fill was placed, compacted, and tested on all the subject lots; the lots are cut-fill lots. The grading operation consisted essentially of the preparation of the areas to receive fill, excavation of loose surface soil and loose fill, and making cuts and fills to the design grades. Expansive material encountered at lot grade was undercut. Excess fill generated was placed offsite to the west of Lots 1 through 4 as compacted and tested fill in the approximate location shown on the attached Figure 1. During the grading operation, compaction procedures were observed, and field density tests were made to help evaluate the relative compaction of the placed fill. Field observa- tions and results of field density tests indicate that the fill has been generally compacted to 90 percent or more of maximum dry laboratory density as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method No. D1557-70. For reference, the approximate location of field density tests and the limits of compacted fill have been recorded on a copy of the grading plan. The results of field density tests, expressed as a percent of maximum laboratory dry density (relative compac- tion), are given on the attached forms. Laboratory tests were made on representative samples of the materials used for fill. The tests were performed to evaluate moisture density relationships, maximum dry density, optimum moisture content, grain size distribution, plasticity, and swell characteristics. The results of laboratory tests are attached. SUMMARY OF FINISH GRADE SOIL CONDITIONS During the grading operation, certain lots were specially treated to provide a specified depth of select soil at rough grade. Kamãr Construction Company, Inc. October 15, 1981 Revised: October 28, 1981 Project No. 511011-FC01 Page 3 Woodward-Clyde Consultants Fill Portion of Cut-Fill Lots Observations and laboratory tests indicate that nonexpansive fill was placed within 2 feet of rough grade on the fill portion of lots noted herein. Cut Portion of Cut-Fill Lots On Lots 5, 6 and 7 expansive soil was excavated and replaced with nonexpansive fill to a depth of 2 feet below rough lot grade wherever encountered over the entire level lot. RECOMMENDATIONS Foundations for Structures on Nonexpansive Soils: All Lots We recommend that foundations for single-story or two-story residential structures placed on nonexpansive undisturbed soil or on nonexpansive properly compacted fill be designed for a bearing pressure not exceeding 2,000 psf (dead plus live loads). We recommend that footings be founded at least 12 inches below finished grade, and have a minimum width of 12 inches. In our opinion, this bearing pressure can be increased by no more than one-third for loads that include wind or seismic forces. Slopes Fill slopes at the site have inclinations of approximately 2:1 (horizontal to vertical), and are approximately 11 feet high (maximum). Fill slopes were treated by baôkrolling with a ballasted sheepsfoot and trackrolling with a bulldozer. We recommend that structures that will not tolerate differen- tial settlements (such as foundations, swimming pools, concrete decks, walls, etc.) not be located within 8 feet of the top of a slope. We recommend that footings that are located within 8 feet of the top of a slope be extended in depth until the outer bottom edge of the footing is 8 feet horizontally from the outside face of the slope. Additional Fill and Utility Trenches This report discusses the fill placement observed by personnel from our firm during the periods specified. We recommend that any additional fill placed, as well as backfill placed in utility trenches located within 5 feet of a building and deeper than 12 inches, or backfill placed in any trench located 5 feet or more from a building and deeper than 5 feet, Kamar Coistruction Company, Inc. October 15, 1981 Revised: October 28, 1981. Woodwarc.CIde CsLdtntt Project No. 511011-FC01 Page 4 be compacted under our observation and tested to verify com- pliance with the earthwork specifications for the project. We should be contacted at least 24 hours prior to backfilling operations. Drainage We recommend that positive measures be taken to properly finish grade each lot after structures and other improvements are in place, so that drainage waters from the lot and adja- cent properties are directed off the lot and away from foundations, floor slabs, and slope tops. Even when these measures are taken, a shallow ground-water or surface-water condition can and may develop in areas where no such water condition existed prior to site development; this is particu- larly true where a substantial increase in surface-water infiltration results from landscape irrigation. LIMITATIONS The elevations of compaction tests shown as finished grade (FG) tests on the attached forms correspond to the elevations shown on the "Plot and Grading Plans, Laguna Riviera Unit No. 11-CT-80-39," undated, prepared by Raymond R. Ribal, Brea, California. Elevations and locations used in this report were based on field surveys done by others. The soil conditions described in this report are based on observations and periodic testing. This office should be notified of any indications that soil conditions are not as described herein. We will observe foundation excavations for each lot if we are requested to do so. For this report, rough lot grade is defined as that grade set in the field by the grade checker from reference stakes estab- lished by the surveyor, and represents rough grade at the time we were observing the grading operation. Likewise, the indi- cated depths of undercutting of expansive soil and depths of placement of nonexpansive soil were based on the measurements made by and grades set by the contractor's grade checker. The conclusions and opinions drawn from the test results and site observations apply only to our work with respect to grading, and represent conditions at the date of our final observation. We will accept no responsibility for any subse- quent changes made to this site by others, or by uncontrolled action of water, or by failure of others to properly repair damages by uncontrolled action of water. Kani.r Construction Company, Inc. October 15, 1981 Revised: October 28, 1981 Project No. 511011-FC01 4 Page Woodwarcf.Cyde Costnf. If you have any questions please give us a call. Very truly yours, WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS A64~lez"_ Richard P. While R.E. 21992 RPW/EHP/eej. Attachments (4) Kamar Construction Company (1) Raymond R. Ribal L E G E N D: Indicates approximate location of Field Density Test. j Indicates approximate area of 1 Offsitc fill. GJ Indicates lot number. PARK DRIVE APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1" = 75' OFFSITE FILL LOCATION MAP LAGUNA RIVIERA UNIT 11 DRAWN BY: m rk I CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO: 511011- FC 01 1 DATE: 10-28-81 J FIGURE NO: 1 WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS COMPACTION TEST RESULTS Joss NAME LAGUNA RIVIERA UNIT 11 DATE REPORTED 10/15/81 lai NUMBER 511011-FCO1 DATEBCOVERED SEPTEMBER 8, 1981 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 18, 1981 PAGE. 1 OP 1 MOISTURE FIELD LABORATORY RELATIVE DATE IDlY RETEST LOCATION ELEVATION CONTENT DENSITY DENSITY COMPACTION NUMBER OF OF TEST % DRY WT. PC? PCP % Or LAB. DENS. SEP 8 1 LOT 3 26' 14.3 117.7 123.5 95 2 LOT 4 28' 11.7 116.4 123.5 94 3 LOT 3 30' 13.6 122.3 123.5 99 SEP 9 4 FILL AREA W. OF LOT 4 34' 11.7 120.4 123.5 97 5 " " 'u ' " 3 38' 13.0 115.6 123.5 93' SEP 10 6 FILL AREA W. OF LOT 2 42' 13.0 117.5 127.0 92 7 I' go to to to 4 46' 11.7 116.6 127.0 91 SEP 11 8 FILL AREA W. OF LOT 2 48' 12.3 120.0 127.0 94 9 " " " " " 1 50' 11.7 118.0 127.5 92 10 LOT 4 25' 12.3 113.1 123.5 91 11 LOT 3 28' 13.0 119.9 127.0 94 SEP 14 12 LOT 5 - 27' 12.3 118.1 123.0 96 13 LOT 3 30' 11.7 117.5 123.0 95 SEP 15 14 FILL AREA W. OF LOT 1 52' 12.3 110.3 123.5 86 15 14 " we " to " " 52' 13.0 118.1 123.5 95 SEP 16 16 FILL AREA W. OF LOT 1 56' 11.7 120.4 127.0 94 17 it " " we of 14 58' 13.0 115.6 123.0 93 18 LOT 1 FG 39.5' 12.3 119.9 127.0 94 19 LOT 2, UPPER LEVEL FG 37.5' 11.1 114.1 123.0 92 20 LOT 3 FG 31.0' 11.7 111.9 123.0 90 SEP 17 21 LOT 4 FG 28.0' 10.5 111.2 123.0 90 22 LOT 5, UPPER LEVEL FG 28.0' 11.1 113.9 123.0 92 23 LOT 5, LOWER LEVEL FG 24.0' 11.7 119.4 127.0 94 24 LOT 6 FG 20.0' 11.1 115.8 123.0 94 SEP 18 25 LOT 7 FG 17.0' 11.7 112.1 123.0 91 26 FILL AREA W. OF LOT 3 FG 44.0' 11.1 112.9 123.0 91 27 to if " " " 15 FG 60.0' 12.3 120.4 127.0 94 Woodward. Clyde Consultants Acdo CONSULTING ENGINEERS. GEOLOGISTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTISTS PLASTICITY CHARACTERISTICS 1 2 3 Liquid Limit, % 33 28 - Plasticity Index, % 16 9 NP Classification by Unified Soil Classification System SC SC SM IcBBLESJ GRAVEL1 SAND SI 0 LT & CLAY1 c dCi ml f 100 BOF I 1 \L' 1 1 60 I- z w40 C.) w o. 20 O N i III liii liii III I 1000 100 10 1.0 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE, mm MECHANICAL ANALYSIS 150 ZERO AIR VOIDS CURVES —2.80 SG —2.7OSG — 2.60 SG 140 2.50 SG DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA 1 2 Dry Density, pcf - - - InitialWaterContent,% - - - FinalWaterContent,% — - — Apparent Cohesion, psf - - - ApparentFrictionAngle,degrees - — — SWELL TEST DATA 1 2 3 InitialDryDensity,pcf 112 — — InitialWaterContent,% 11 - — FinalDryDensity,pcf 108 — — FinalWaterContent,% 17 - - Load,psf 160 — — Swell,percent 3.7 — — 130 2 I_I_I_I_I Maximum Dry 1 2 3 Density, pcf 123.5 127.0 123.0 - Optimum Moisture - Content,% 10.5 8.5 11.0 T_I_I_I_I_MOISTURE CONTENT,% - 8C0 10 20 30 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST SAMPLE LOCATION - 1 ON SITE 2 -I CUT AREA, LOTS 5 & 6 3 I LOTS 4-7 40 LABORATORY COMPACTION TEST METHOD: ASTMD155770A FILL SUITABILITY TESTS j LAGUNA RIVIERA, UNIT 11 DRAWN BY: mrk CHECKED BY: 0W1_PROJECT NO- 511011—FCO1 DATE- 10/15/81FIGURE NO: 2 t 10/2/81 WOODWARD-CLYDE CONSULTANTS