Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2614 UNICORNIO ST; ; CB951870; Permit
12 7.00 1 15.00 1. 7.00 1 7.00 1 7.00 2 7.00 200 .25 1 9.00 3 6.50 .32 2925 ri BUILDING PERMIT 03/18/96 11:17 Page 1 of 1 Job Address: 2614 UNICORNIO ST Suite: TMtt' LIRMTrV TTATTM(! - Permit No: CB951870 Project No: A9502731 Development No: I LII • , , .&. - '-' 6548 03/18/96 0001 01. 02 Parcel No: Lot#: Valuation: 176,276 Construction Typte7N 14370.00 I Occupancy Group: Reference#: Status: ISSUED Description: 2091 SF SFD,599 SF GAR Applied: 12/22/95 I : LA COSTA MEADOWS Apr/Issue: 03/18/96 Entered By: RMA Appl/Ownr : GOETHOLS, MARK 619-455-8100 3331 CALLE ODESSA CARLSBAD CA 92009 Fees Cb'llected & Credits "S ©T~ ~ot i Total Payment's. tue Fee description / ---' // )'/Vnts çe,Un1t ----------------------- - ------ 11- Number of Bedrooms / / \ 7v' Number of Bathrooms Building Permit IDI-nn Check ( N Strong Motion Fee Enter Number of EDU's - Water"Fe Enter "Y" to Autocalc\P.F.F.\ (PFF) .F.D. \ / Enter UH to Autocalc \.. > T.I. r' "S. . It "Y" Enter to Autocalc Bri'geefl> 'lJ Enter LFM Fee (Zones=6,11,14) * BUILDING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Plumbing Issue Fee.- Each Plumbing Fixture or Trap >- Each Building Sewer > Each Install/Repair Water Line > Each Water Heater and/or Vent > Gas Piping System > Each Vacuum Breaker • > * PLUMBING TOTAL Enter "Y" for Electric Issue Fee > Single Phase Per AMP > * ELECTRICAL TOTAL Enter 'V for Mechanical Issue Fee> Install Furn/Ducts/Heat Pumps > Each Exhaust Fan ) * MECHANICAL TOTAL PLDAD >. Construct Housing(Y/N)? > Enter Impact Fee > CITY OF CARLS 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA CLEARANCE APPROVAL _DATE C1 47 *** Fees Required *** Fees: 14,961.94" Adjustments: ,(oo Total Fees: 14,96L00 / .00 591.00 14,370.00 Ext fee Data --------------- 3.00 2.50 909.00 591.00 18.00 2400.00 3208.00 Y 2961.00 395.00 Y 445.00 530.00 Y 310.00 11767.00 20.00 Y 84.00 15.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 14.00 154.00 10.00 Y 50.00 60.00 15.00 Y 9.00 19.50 44.00 11.00 L N 2925.00 I ~,ry/ PERMiT APPLICATION 'I! City of CarLsbad Building Department 2075 Las Palmas Dr., CarLsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 From List I (see back) give code of Permit-Type: f I) --------------------------------------------------------- For Residential Projects Only: From List 2 (see back) give Code of Structure-Type: PLAN CHECK NO. V ,5/ 6Y7Q 5267 12/22/95 0001 01 02 C-PRMT 591.03 Net Loss/Gain of Dwelling Units 2. PROJECT INFORMATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Address $.Building or Suite No. Nearest Cross Street L.rA,liL uritir nun i.o NO. uowvision nam'numoe 7 No. Phase No. CHEK BELOW IF SUBM!JrED: Energy Caics Structural Calm D 2 Soils Report DI Addressed Envelope DESCRIPTION OF WORK 5t7 (1 64144 & SQ. FT. 2L,92 I # OF STORIES/ # OF BEDROOMS Z3' # OF AThROOMS - .5 5. WNIAt. 15E1th2Jrl (Ii clirierent rrom applicanti NAME (last.name firs rAo4- ADDRESS 3 33/ (J5) CYI's' STATE 1,4 ZIP CODE f2004 DAY TELEPHONE APPLICANT U CONIHACIUR U AGINF FOR CONIHA1UR WUWNEK U AGENt FOR OWNER NAME (last name first) ,y e d5- VZOC ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE PROPERTY OWNER NAME (last name first) £.f * ADDRESS 33:71 'he 2de'S.s CITY éJI STATE ZIP CODE f.17.00 ? DAY TELEPHONE NAME (last name first) ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE DAY TELEPHONE STATE LIC. # - LICENSE CLASS - CITY BUSINESS TIC. # UiJNEJt 1-41iV& !IdSL name II[SLJ £4-A' PdJUitr. 737 Coa r'-y.,00€f4". CITY JCIW//J STATE 4' ZIP CODE '/2o.Z / DAY TELEPHONE .ij/- 717S STATE TIC. # 7. WORKERS' WMPENSA11ON Workers' Compensation Declaration: I hereby affirm that I have a certificate or consent to sell-insure issued by the Director 01 Industrial Relations, or a certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance by an admitted insurer, or an exact copy or duplicate thereof certified by the Director of the insurer thereof filed with the Building Inspection Department (Section 3800, Lab. Q. INSURANCE COMPANY POLICY NO. EXPIRATION DATE Certificate of Exemption: I certify that in the pertormance 01 the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to beco. ubect to the Compensation Laws of California. SIG ATURE DATE ' I—IMER-BUPWER DECLARATION Owner-Builder Declaration: I hereby affirm that I am exempt trom the Contractor's License law for the following reason: D I, as owner of the property or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner-builder will have the burden /of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and contracts for such projects with contractor(s) licensed pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). D I am exempt under Section Business and Professions Code for this reason: (Sec. 7031.5 Business and Professions Code: Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom, and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to aaMl enalty of not more than five hundred dollars [$500]). SIGNATURE DATE Is the applicant or fururebuilding occupant required to submit a business plan, acutely hazardous materials registration form or risk management and prevention program under Sections 25505, 25533 or 25534 of the Presley-Tanner Hazardous Substance Account Act? DYES 13 NO Is the applicant or future building occupant required to obtain a permit from the air pollution control district or air quality management district? DYES 0 N Is the facility to be constructed within 1,000 feet of the outer boundary of a school site? DYES 0 N IF ANY OF THE ANSWERS ARE YES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MAY NOT BE ISSUED AFTER JULY 1, 1989 UNLESS THE APPLICANT HAS MET OR IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICf. I hereby altirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance 01 the work for which this permit is issued (Sec 3097(1) Civil Code). LENDER'S NAME LENDER'S ADDRESS 10. APPUCANI CEItI 1CA liON I certify that I have read the application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all City ordinances and State laws relating to building construction. I hereby authorize representatives of the City of Carlsbad to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARlSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES, JUDGMENTS COSTS AND EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE GRANTING OF ThIS PERMIT. 0511k An OSHA permit is required for excavations over 5,0" deep and demolition or construction of structures over 3 stories in height. Expiration. Every permit issued by the Building Official under the provisions of this Code shall expire by limitation and become null and void if the building or work authorized by such permit is not commenced within 365 days from the date of such permit or if the building or work authorized by such permit is suspended or abandoned at any ti 'afte the work is commenced for a period of 180 days (Section 303(d) Uniform Building Code). APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE ._- DATE: ,'. -,/ 475— 1) 0 List 1- Permit-Type From the following list, determine the permit-type that best describes the work you, propose to do. Please put the code of that permit-type in the blank at the top of the page on the front of this application. Residential permits (only) also require the identification of the 'structure-type to be associated with the permit. Choose a structure-type from "List 2 - Structure-Types" and put its code in the appropriate blank on the front of this application. Residential Permits Code Description APT Apartments - new construction. CONDO Condominiums - new construction. CVNNR Conversion. Convert all or a portion of a non-residential building to residential use, creating one or more new residential units. CVNRN Conversion. Convert one or more residences in a building to non-residential usage. CVNRR Conversion. Increase or reduce the number of dwelling units in a residential structure through interior modifications (i.e.: a four bedroom house converted to a duplex, with 2 bedro6ms each). DEMO Demolition permit. (Also specify type of structure from List 2). DUP Duplex- new construction. MOHO Mobile home, renovation, repair, or addition of accessory structure not yielding a new living uxumt "I MOHON Mobile home, pre-fabricated house, or tailer installed (plumbed, wired) in a mobile +home park (see distinction from single-family residence, below). RAD IN Residential addition/alteration, creating no new dwelling unit(s). RREISSUE Residential permit re-issue. RREPAIR Residential building repair. Damage, fire, etc. RREPLACE Residential building replacement (no additional units). SFA Single-family, attached - new construction. A one-family house attached to one or more other houses, with one or more common walls extending from foundation to roof at, or forming, a lot line. Has own plumbing and heating system (e.g.: townhouse, row house, half-plex) SFD Single-family, detached - new construction: A one-family house with open area on all four sides. May have an attached or detached garage, or a business. May be a detached "granny flat". May be a mobile home or trailer* on an individual lot, but not in a mobile home park. Non-Residential/Accessory Permits Code Description COM Commercial structure, new construction. CREISSUE Commercial permit re-issue. CREPAIR Commercial building- repair. Damage, fire, etc. CREPLACE Commercial building - replacement. CT! Commercial tenant improvement. DEMO Demolition permit. ELEC Electrical permit, for electrical work only. HOTEL Hotel or motel (including Managed Living Unit hotel) - new construction. HOTELR Hotel renovation. INDUST Industrial structure, new construction. IT! Industrial tenant improvement. MECH Mechanical permit, for mechanical work only. MISC Miscellaneous. Use only if proposed work doesn't fit another activity type. PATIO Patio and/or deck. PLUM Plumbing permit, for plumbing work only. POOL Gunite pools and spas. RETAIN Retaining wall permit. SIGN Sign construction/installation permit. SOLAR Solar energy system installation permit (specify structure type to be served). SPA Factory-made or Gunite. List 2 - Structure-Type (Use with Residential Permit Only) From the following list, determine the type of residential structure that best describes the structure on which you will be working. Please put the code of that structure-type in the appropriate blank at the top of the page on the front of this application. Code Description SFA Single-family, attached. A one-family house attached to one or more other houses, with one or more common walls extending from foundation to roof at, or forming, a lot line. Has own plumbing and heating System. (e.g.: townhouse, row house, half-plex). SFD Single-family detached: A one-family house with open area on all four sides. May have an attached or detached garage, or a business. May be a detached "granny flat". May be a mobile home or trailer on an individual lot, but not in a mobile home park. MF2-4 Multi-family, 2 to 4 units. A residential structure on a single lot, containing two, three, or four dwelling units. Units may share master heating, plumbing, or electrical service (e.g.: duplex, triplex, quad-plex). MF5+ Multi-family, 5 or more units. Same as MF2-4, except the building has a t least five attached units on the same lot. MOHO Mobile home, pre-fabricated house, or trailer installed (plumbed, wired) in a mobile home park (see distinction from single-family residence, above). CITY OF CARLSBAD INSPECTION REQUEST PERNIT# CB951870 FOR 09/04/96 DESCRIPTION: 2091 SF SFD,599 SF GAR LA COSTA MEADOWS TYPE: SFD JOB ADDRESS: 2614 UNICORNIO ST APPLICANT: GOETHOLS, MARK PHONE: CONTRACTOR: OWNER: REMARKS: RS/MARK SPECIAL INSTRUCT: INSPECTOR AREA PD PLANCK# CB951870 0CC GRP CONSTR. TYPE VN STE: LOT: 619-455-8100 LL1J . PHONE: INSPECTO ________________________ TOTAL TIME: --RELATED PERMITS-- PERMIT# TYPE STATUS RW960142 ROW ISSUED CD LVL DESCRIPTION ACT COMMENTS 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical 19 ST Final Structural 29 PL Final Plumbing 39 EL Final Electrical 49 ME Final Mechanical *** INSPECTION HISTORY ***** DATE DESCRIPTION ACT INSP COMMENTS 083096 Final Combo CO PD 082396 Final Combo NS DC 082296 Gas/Test/Repairs AP DC 081996 Gas/Test/Repairs CO DC ND 10# PRESSURE 062596 Interior Lath/Drywall AP DC 062196 Insulation AP PD 061996 Insulation CO PD 061796 Insulation CO PD 061296 Rough Combo AP PD 061196 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO PD 061196 Rough Electric CO PD 060796 Frame/Steel/Bolting/Welding CO PD 060796 Rough Electric CO PD 060396 Shear Panels/HD's AP PD OK TO WRAP 053196 Final Structural CO PD 053196 Rough Electric CO PD 052496 Rough Electric CO TP NO PLANS,CARD,NEED FRN 050396 Shear Panels/HD's CO PD 050396 Roof/Reroof AP PD 042296 Const. Service/Agricultural AP PD TSPB 040496 Ftg/Foundation/Piers AP PD 040396 Ftg/Foundation/Piers CO PD /9/i fl r ,5 Aggz r ___ , £o' FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION DEPT: BUILDING ENGINEERING FIRE PLANNING U/M WATER PLAN CHECK#: CB951870 DATE: 08/23/96 PERMIT#: CB951870 PERMIT TYPE: SFD PROJECT NAME: 2091 SF SFD,599 SF GAR. LA COSTA MEADOWS ADDRESS: 2614 UNICORNIO ST AUG 221996 CONTACT PERSON/PHONE#: MW/MARX/495-1973 SEWER DIST: LC WATER DIST: CA INSPECTE- DATE BY: i27t INSPECTED: APPROVED DISAPPROVED BY: INSPECTED: r/ APPROVED SAPPROVED INS PECD- DATE INSPECTED DATE BY: INSPECTED: APPROVED - DISAPPROVED - COMMENTS: ) S ,U 0 n 6e7Z f- t rnJsf, ;e too, A)74z4f ñSA-*D-/ foti'73 J'iL' 1 7 - lt-'TD T7 ?41- 1&I#i Ot ç c1e jøj'; A4 e,Zc a . " P o LJ ,) '1 1 C )' .S7i'P'*i23, SOUTHWEST INSPECTION & TESTING 10826 SOUTH NORWALK BLVD. SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 (310) 941-2990 • (714) 526-8441 • FAX (310) 946-0026 REGISTERED INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT ISW ll~Tp, DatQ1,. TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUIRED 0, Reinforced Concrete 0 Structural Steel Assembly 0 Quality Control Post Tensioned Concrete 0 Fire Proofing 0 Other 0 Reinforced Masonry 0 Asphalt Job Add , , City Job Nam /fg Permit No. 9- /g70 Issued By c,, zej Type of Structure . 51.11_t z' Architect SPtt Material Description (type, grade, source) Engineer S'Pi* iJç ,&c 4. q/f Contractor 1C'ec7'f4LL &4Iiiaeve r-,cs.17 Inspector(s) Name if IA e/14_ Subcontractor £/ -9s ,._ TESTS PERFORMED TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP QUANTITY IN SET ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES n.LJ /14PL AA v8c C4/ . INSPECTION SUMMARY - LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS. ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT. AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE & IDENT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED; ETC. OItviD y, ft24ei,-M.-'r 'OZ v , f'c t / /4' Ccrrn A'ôei (/iw k4' /2 c Pci/I £iC1, /A.'CfC OA ,-f 4J6'4, S7V' j,j a4 4 5*67' 94c!k 4' 1 A4 4 a CAW C'' ..u& ,(/,LDbL '4'i.) 144 C/..E,4,(L2 7711 J, 4- 7- C,rp SLD. D-60 77. C/fCZ /'7 Yaci7 45 66e '4-01Mci160 77 PL.i-4 I '4tI/'c4-774 V r ,P AIZ-211 P6?Z- 17o61si1-1 !t,r e€zs-t - &L/i #1 4-7 - A11 U V /f CIII,? C/I,if,S' i- e 1 $C. ru V ,1, , 41, KA.41 S 04 7AwS 1C, 7-z 0) fa' 7t ,0Df£0 j/ CfytAl CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. IGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR \4 OPECIALTYV NO. AGENCY WHITE. OFFICE COPY, CANARY - ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 PAGE I OF 1 I TIME IN I TIME OUT I REG. HOURSI O.T. HOURS I CYLINDERS I 2490I/'ooI 6 Ia— I 3 All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours. 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By - JOB SITE COPY '4- SOUTHWEST INSPECTION & TESTING 10826 SOUTH NORWALK BLVD. SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 (310) 941-2990 • (714) 526-8441 • FAX (310) 946-0026 REGISTERED INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT W No IS3 , TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUIRED 0 Reinforced Concrete iJ' Post Tensioned Concrete 0 Reinforced Masonry LI Structural Steel Assembly 0 Quality Control 0 Fire Proofing 0 Other 0 Asphalt Job Address City Job Name /1AA /? 60t7w4L ç Permit No. 9 (/ J Issued By - Type of Structure . Sii,eUt fr,i,i'tY Architect LSl' DpA/77A16 Material Description (type, grade, source) Engineer 58f, .)Pe/AL 1' çm41 /?7T e4s - Contractor J1'I~71ALL (fa M2':4 Inspector(s) Name Subcontractor TESTS PERFORMED TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP QUANTITY IN SET ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES INSPECTION SUMMARY - LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN. WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS. REMARKS. ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT . AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED. NUMBER, TYPE & IDENT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED; ETC. 74A Cl" fooriA' s 5-;i: ,s,j /,,,i,:dr Prz hOd1 P64 A/i°ivt F- A/ CUt ) frl4A / f POVE0741 ('//icki) j11,O i7/ f 5X.Iz? li~,i (rA.'fo,t is 77- f.7' CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 PAGE / OF / I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL I I I I OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS TIME IN I TIME OUT I REQ. HOURSI O.T. HOURS I CYLINDERS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. 3:3 D I All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours - 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. I&NATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR At~re co. '1 Approved B7 /' rojec SupunntañT SP'ECIALTY NO. AGENCY a WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY- ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY, Gt ,IROD - JOB SITE COPY SOUTHWEST INSPECTION AND TESTING INC. 10826 S. Norwalk #A Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 310-941-2990 714-526-8441 Fax-310-946-0026 FIELD DATA ON TEST SPECIMENS ASTM C31., C138, C143, C172, C173, C231, C1064 CONCRETE: X GROUT: MORTAR: SHOTCRETE: CORES: GUNITE: ADDRESS: 2614 UNICORNIO, CARLSBAD I JOB 41: 6096 DATE: 5/8/96 JOB NAME: MARK GOETHALS PERMIT 1$: 951870 ISSUED BY: CITY ARCHITECT: SPEC DRAFTING ENGINEER: SPECIALTY STEEL CONTRACTOR: WESTFALL CONST. SUB CONTRACTOR: LOCATION IN STRUCTURE: LOT 2 N/E SECTION CONCRETE SUPPLIER: ESCONDIOO PLANT: 2 MIX 41: 35P TYPE OF CEMENT: II & V ADMIXTURE: POZZ TICKET 41: 195914 SLUMP: 5 1/2" WATER ADDED: 5 AIR TEMP: 68 CONCRETE TEMP: 70 MIXING TIME: 60 TIME CAST: 8:50 DATE CAST: 4/5/96 RECEIVED AT LAB: 4/8/96 SPECIMENS MADE BY: CLYDE LACHER -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SPECIFIED PSI: 2500 FIELD IDENTIFICATION I A I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B I C I D I E I F LAB IDENTIFICATION : 603123 : ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 603123 : 603123 : -------------------I--------- AGE DAYS : 14 : 28 I---------I---------I--------I--------I-------- : 28 : DATE TESTED : 4/19 : 5/3 : 5/3 : SIZE—IN. : 6X12 : 6X12 : 6X12 : AREA—SQ.IN : 28.27 : 28.27 : 28.27 : CRUSH LOAD—LBS : 91000 : 109500 : 110500 : COMP—STR.—PSI. - : 3218 : 3873 : 3908 : I H/D CORR FACTOR CORR. STR. —PSI TIME TESTED ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REMARKS:• ASTM C39, C174, C192, C470, C617, C42 COMPLIES: X DOES NOT COMPLY: BREAK TYPE A: X B: C: 0: E: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS REPORT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED, EX ULL WITHOUT THE APROVAL OF SITI RESP FULLY SUBMITTED S THL.JES SPECTION AND TESTING SAMPLES CAST BY OTHERS: OSCA,.VD. ANDRES LAB. MANAGER ASTM C39 BREAKS A= cone B= cone and split C= cone 0= shear E= columnar c SOUTHWEST INSPECTION & TESTING 10826 SOUTH NORWALK BLVD. SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 (310) 941-2990 • (714) 526-8441 • FAX (310) 946-0026 REGISTERED INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT I SWIT ,Iob N I , TYPE OF INSPECTION I REQUIRED I 0 Reinforced Concrete . 0 Structural Steel Assembly 0 Ouality Control L-'F5t Tensioned Concrete 0 Fire Proofing 0 Other 0 Reinforced Masonry 0 Asphalt Job Address . City 2 C/'/ V'/C/&4,t CLJ8%'.D Job Name c Permit No. Issulw Type of Structure Architect Material Description (type, grade, source) / Engineer . &'4','2€ J'7,dpt j Contractor 14-1. , ' r Inspector(s) Name ' Subcontractor TESTS PERFORMED TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP QUANTITY IN SET ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES INSPECTION SUMMARY - LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED. TEST SAMPLES TAKEN. WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS. PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT. AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER, TYPE & IDENT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TORQUED) CHECKED; ETC. 7,/ 'r f '— 1LF ,j',,n..-c e' /V/ C'7,ç? Ipy /..X 4 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. SIGNA URE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR / / r' SPECIALTY NO. AGENCY CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 PAGE ( OF / I TIME IN I TIME OUT I REG. HOURSI O.T. HOURS I CYLINDERS I / e.,499 I Y I H- All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. Approved By WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY- ACCOUNTING COPY. PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY. GOLDENROD - JOB SITE COPY STRESSING RECORD DATE JOB NO._____________ SOUTHWEST INSPECTION & TESTING© 10826 South Norwalk Boulevard (310) 941-2990 0.(714) 526-8441 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Telefax (310) 946-0026 JOB NAME <'M-J f ñ6dl CITY TRACT NO. CONTRACTOR /1'P_c /d'&,tq SUBCONTRACTOR S'7' / - - 7,V ENGINEER SINGLE FAI4ILY_ MULTI FAMILY.._ DECK_ LOT-NO.________ PLAN TYPE PERMIT NO. GAUGE NO. /Vi' COLOR GAUGE READING ELONG.CHECK LIFT OFF MARK/ COLOR GAUGE READING ELONG. CHECK LIFT OFF ACT. CALC ACT. FCALC ç - 2,, 19e 3 20' 4 \ /:( 217— 7$ 22 r $ 6 -) 17 _____ 23 _____ _______ J)f• ____ 7 '. / 17 24, -7 ;.c i 8 9 ( 25 9 26,, 10" 127 / 28, 12 29 13 It v,i 30 14 31 / 32 16 ,Y- 33 ,c [34 INSPECTOR X/fr—'/J/j,',_— LICENSE NO. 3 STRESSING BY - ENGINEER CONTACTED YES.. NO.....('OK TO CUT TENDONS SPEC DRAFTING 437 Countrywood Ln. Encinitas, Ca. 92024 (619) 481-7475 RE: Goethals' Residence @ 2614 Unicornio This letter will changes the following notes: Page 6, note 5: All headers in excess of 9 feet in length will be DOUG FIR #1 or better. Page 6, note 8: DBL BAY BLK at openings 5' or greater is optional. WF Sincer oral Owner CJ5SIy7o ) SOUTHWEST INSPECTION & TESTING 10826 SOUTH NORWALK BLVD. SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 (310) 941-2990 • (714) 526-8441 9 FAX (310) 946-0026 REGISTERED INSPECTOR'S DAILY REPORT I5 WI ot P ID8t y TYPE OF INSPECTION REQUIRED EJ Reinforced Concrete 1) Structural Steel Assembly UI Quality Control %j Post Tensioned Concrete 11 Fire Proofing U Other [1 Reinforced Masonry [I Asphalt Job Address City ...' Job Name HAAk 60 . TH 4 ç Permit No.9 Issued By, r , W4 S e-4 Type of Structure S/6Ic /-At'tV Architect DO/ 7'4 Material Description (type, grade, source) Engineer 1' AJ A Contractor Inspector(s) Name" A AYPe ./.4C//cd Subcontractor TESTS PERFORMED TYPE OF SAMPLE SLUMP QUANTITY IN SET ADDITIONAL REMARKS ON SAMPLES INSPECTION SUMMARY - LOCATIONS OF WORK INSPECTED, TEST SAMPLES TAKEN, WORK REJECTED, JOB PROBLEMS, PROGRESS, REMARKS, ETC. INCLUDES INFORMATION ABOUT - AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL PLACED OR WORK PERFORMED, NUMBER. TYPE & IDENT. NO'S OF TEST SAMPLES TAKEN: STRUCT. CONNECTIONS (WELD MADE H.T. BOLTS TOROUED) CHECKED: ETC. 4' (Pg t• / ,t' 779,4 .T p. r. IA -itja loo PE4 464'fav" p. . /2I1%l( I c4-i-",,-4--7-,'— C fr7A4 ie, ,q, CiIi1''t . c ..' .i' c (ç r fl.r i'i,s CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSPECTED TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ALL OF THE ABOVE REPORTED WORK UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I HAVE FOUND THIS WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS. AND APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE GOVERNING BUILDING LAWS. .- SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED INSPECTOR ID-,. l,-i - -#_. • CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 0 PAGE OF TIME IN TIME OUT REG. HOURS O.T. HOURS CYLINDERS 3.' Y 3o All inspections based on a minimum of 4 hours and over 4 hours . 8 hour minimum. In addition, any inspection extending past noon hour will be an 8 hour minimum. "It id.cC#t# £. ' " Approved by .- SPECIALTY NO. AGENCY /' ,/ . TPràjèbtSuperintendent , WHITE - OFFICE COPY, CANARY ACCOUNTING COPY, PINK - INSPECTOR'S COPY, GODENROD . JOB SITE COPY .. 0039tJd 1biOL ** (1;' 0• Geotechnkal & Environmental Engineers, Inc. Pmjecz 111ciC. 6OtL& W.O. #:ô3',O/. Z 3 Technician: £RV 2t/e1 S+. fi.I t.4 ThSTNO. .J)2-3 DAM / C 9c 3/ 3/, o TEST DEPTH(EL) V. LOCATION& OR LOT NO. Aje. SOIL SAMPLE &TARE TARE SOIL SAND BEFORE SAND RETURNED 3 Post-it' Fax NOW 7671 SAND USED - -- • CONE&PL'tTE TARE To th ic. 6' From SAND IN HOLE GoJDeL VOLUMEOPHOLE "°' io'))C 7t —3 Fax#11 SAND TARE WErDENSffY I I i9 j !Cf SOIL BEFORE SOILAFTER MOISTURE TARE DRY SOIL %MOISTURECONTENT N o cS . MAX DENSITY n Ito 1106-1 OPTIMUM MOISTURE 13 1 (3 DRYDENSUY % COMPACTION Z, 90: SOILTYPE 27447 Ezuci'pisc CircZc Wcsc - Temccula . CA 92590 - TEL (909)676-8337 - FAX (909) 676 -4583 10039d 9P6-669 (606) WOèJ 8001 96 02 8tJW To: 4122/96 Pagel of 1 Nil yn81 81, 00. Title 24 Consulting • HVAC Design April 22, 1996 Mark Radnor MPG Homes 3331 Calle Odessa Carlsbad CA 92009 RE: Goethals Residence Dear Mark: The Title 24 energy calculations will still comply when 2(1656) windows are added. This small amount of area will not adversely affect the overall performance of the building. If you have any further questions or comments, please call me. Sincerely, Mark Gallant, CEPE City of CALAD BUILDI"18 DEPT. 425 W. 5th Ave., Ste. 201, Escondido, CA 92025 (619) 743-5408 Escondido • (619) 531-1122 San Diego 9 (714) 241-8707 Santa Aria EsGil Corporation' Professional Plan Review Engineers DATE: 3/6196 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1870 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2614 Unicornio Street PROJECT NAME: Goethals SFD U APPLICANT JURIS. U FIRE U REVIEWER U FILE SET: III The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. J The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: REMARKS: Note on the plan that provide special inspection for the post-tension slab. By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation DGA 0CM E] GP DPC 2/27 trnsmtidot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 EsGil Corporation Professional Plan Review Engineers DATE:. 1/25/96 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1870 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2614 Unicornio Street PROJECT NAME: Goethals SFD U APPUCAN)T U FIRE -1'tAN REVIEWER U FILE SET: II The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Mark Goethals 3331 Calle Odessa Carlsbad CA 92009 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: LI REMARKS: ) Telephone #: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation F1 GA E] CM DGP DPC 1/19 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208 • San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 95-1870 II 1/25/96 RECHECK PLAN CORRECTION LIST JURISDICTION: Carlsbad I PROJECT ADDRESS: 2614 Unicornio Street DATE PLAN RECEIVED BY• ESGIL CORPORATION: 1/19 REVIEWED BY: David Yao PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1870 SET: II DATE RECHECK COMPLETED: 1/25/96 FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and disabled access. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinances enforced by the Planning Department, Engineering Department or other departments. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 106.4.3, 1994 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: ESGIL CORPORATION. To facilitate rechecking, please identify, next to each item, the sheet of the plans upon which each correction on this sheet has been made and return this sheet with the revised plans. The following items have not been resolved from the previous plan reviews. The original correction number has been given for your reference. In case you did not keep a copy of the prior correction list, we have enclosed those pages containing the outstanding corrections. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these items. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located on the plans. Have changes been made not resulting from this list? DYes ONo Carlsbad 95-1870 II 1/25/96 7. Provide complete soils report. Provide complete soils report. The report shall include, but not need limited to, a)Description and classification of the materials encountered b)Recommendations for foundation type and design criteria, including bearing capacity, provisions to minimize the effects of expansive soils. c)Expected total and differential settlement. d)Expansion index of the soil. e)Provide complete design calculations, plans and specification with the engineer's seal and signature for the PT slab. f)lf the expansion index is less than 90, the simplify method may be used. If the expansion index is more than 90, the calculation must follow the method specified in the UBC standard. II. Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. 12. Detail truss layout for 30" x 36" attic access, if required for equipment in the attic and detail 30" x 36" clearance through truss webs.(see sheet 6) 19. Provide complete calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy standards. The thermal mass summary should be on the plan. See attached sheet. 23. All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. Please submit two copies.(city policy) If you have any questions regarding these items, please contact David Yao of Esgil Corporation at (619) 560-1468. Thank you. REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY: TITLE 24 COMPLIANCE Each of the following specific items, the MF— 1R page, and Me signed CF-1R pages must be clearly listed on the plans. Goethals Residence R-19 R-13 n/a EXPOSED SLAB Foyer 20 Kit/Nook 133 Family 276 Utility 41 Bath 1 58 Bath 2 20 Cooling Efficiency Duct Insulation Thermostat Double Clear Vinyl Framed (no special shading required) 65 Gallons Gas, Energy Factor = 0.53 minimum External Insulation Blanket Not Required 78% AFUE minimum 10.0 SEER minimum (A/C Optional) R-4.2 minimum Setback required EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (or equal) A.O. Smith FGC-65-224 FAU Make & Model: Premier HBA080ND4R Output Capacity: 64,000 Btuh Heating w/ 3.5 Tons Cooling Capability Note: The UBC requires that the heating system be capable of maintaining a temperature of 70 degrees at three feet above the floor throughout the conditioned space of the residence. The recommendation above is based on MICROPAS heating and/or cooling load calculations. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL SIZING OF HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT. 11 ESGII Corporation Professiona(P&zn Review Engineers DATE: 12129195 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1870 PROJECT ADDRESS: 2614 Unicornio Street PROJECT NAME: Goethals SFD O AP LICANT JURI . 0 FIRE N REVIEWER O FILE SET:I The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficiencies identified below are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check list transmitted herewith is for your information. The plans are being held at Esgil Corporation until corrected plans are submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to forward to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Mark Goethals 3331 Calle Odessa Carlsbad CA 92009 Esgil Corporation staff did not advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Esgil Corporation staff did advise the applicant that the plan check has been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: (by: ) Telephone #: REMARKS: By: David Yao Enclosures: Esgil Corporation E] GA 0CM E] GP E] PC 12/26 trnsmtl.dot 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208• San Diego, California 92123 • (619) 560-1468 • Fax (619) 560-1576 Carlsbad 95-1870 12129/95 PLAN REVIEW CORRECTION LIST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1870 JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PROJECT ADDRESS: 2614 Unicornio Street FLOOR AREA: living 2091 SF garage 599 SF REMARKS: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY JURISDICTION: 12/22 DATE INITIAL PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED: 12/29/95 STORIES: 1 HEIGHT: DATE PLANS RECEIVED BY ESGIL CORPORATION: 12/26 PLAN REVIEWER: David Yao FOREWORD (PLEASE READ): This plan review is limited to the technical requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code and state laws regulating energy conservation, noise attenuation and access for the disabled. This plan review is based on regulations enforced by the Building Department. You may have other corrections based on laws and ordinance by the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Fire Department or other departments. Clearance from those departments may be required prior to the issuance of a building permit. Present California law mandates that residential construction comply with Title 24 and the following model codes: 1991 UBC (effective 8/14/92), 1991 UPC (effective 8/14/92), 1991 UMC (effective 8/14/92) and 1990 NEC (effective 7/1/91). The above regulations apply to residential construction, regardless of the code editions adopted by ordinance. The following items listed need clarification, modification or change. All items must be satisfied before the plans will be in conformance with the cited codes and regulations. Per Sec. 303 (c), 1991 Uniform Building Code, the approval of the plans does not permit the violation of any state, county or city law. To speed up the recheck process. please note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed. i.e., plan sheet number, specification section. etc. Be sure to enclose the marked up list when you submit the revised plans. LIST NO. 1, GENERAL SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AND DUPLEXES WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTS (1991 UBC) r3forw.dot Carlsbad 95-1870 12/29/95 Please make all corrections on the original tracings and submit two new sets of prints to: Esgil Corporation, 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite #208, San Diego, California 92123, (619) 560-1468. Provide a statement on the Title Sheet of the plans that this project shall comply with Title 24 and the 1991 UBC, UMC and UPC and 1990 NEC. GENERAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS 3. Window 2 and 3 appers are not the same between the floor plan and the window schedule. Please check. ROOFING Show attic ventilation. Minimum vent area is 1/150 of attic area (or 1/300 of attic area if at least 50% of the required vent is at least 3 feet above eave vents or cornice vents). Show area required and area provided. Section 3205 (c). Note on the plans: "Attic ventilation openings shall be covered with corrosion-resistant metal mesh with mesh openings of 1/4-inch in dimension." Section 3205(c). FOUNDATION REQUIREMENTS 6. Per soils report, note on the plan the soils classification, whether or not the soil is expansive and note the allowable bearing value. Section 2905 (c). 7. Provide complete soils report. 8. The soils engineer recommended that he/she review the foundation excavations. Note on the foundation plan that "Prior to the contractor requesting a Building Department foundation inspection, the soils engineer shall advise the building official in writing that: The building pad was prepared in accordance with the soils report, The utility trenches have been properly backfilled and compacted, and The foundation excavations, the soils expansive characteristics and bearing capacity conform to the soils report." 9. Provide a letter from the soils engineer confirming that the foundation plan, grading plan and specifications have been reviewed and that it has been determined that the recommendations in the soils report are properly incorporated into the construction documents (when required by the soil report). Carlsbad 95-1870 12/29/95 Note on plans that surface water will drain away from building and show drainage pattern and key elevations. Section 2905 (f). FRAMING Provide truss details and truss calculations for this project. Specify truss identification numbers on the plans. Detail truss layout for 30" x 36" attic access, if required for equipment in the attic and detail 30" x 36" clearance through truss webs.(see sheet 6) Note on the plans that "all weather-exposed surfaces shall have a weather-resistive barrier to protect the interior wall covering and that exterior openings shall be flashed in such a manner as to make them weatherproof'. Section 1708. . MECHANICAL (UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE) Note that passageway to the attic furnace shall be unobstructed and have continuous solid flooring not less than 24 inches wide, not more than 20 feet in length through the attic. Section 708, UMC. Note on plan: Gas vents and noncombustible piping in walls, passing through three floors or less, shall be effectively draft stopped at each floor or ceiling. UBC, Section 1706 (c). Provide dryer vent to outside. The maximum length is 14 feet with two 90-degree elbows. UMC, Section 1903. . ELECTRICAL (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) Note on the plans that receptacle outlet locations will comply with 1990 NEC Art. 210-52(a). . PLUMBING (UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE) Show that water heater is adequately braced to resist seismic forces. UPC, Section 1310. . ENERGY CONSERVATION Provide complete calculations and worksheets to show compliance with current energy standards. Provide a note on the plans stating "All new glazing (fenestrations) will be installed with a certifying label attached, showing the U-value." Carlsbad 95-1870 12/29/95 . CARLSBAD S.F.D. & DUPLEX SUPPLEMENT New residential units must be pre-plumbed for future solar water heating. Note that two roof jacks must be installed where the water heater is in the one story garage and directly below the most south facing roof (City Ordinance No. 8093). All piping for present or future solar water heating must be insulated when in areas that are not heated or cooled by mechanical means (city policy). All new residential buildings, including additions, require a soils report. Please submit two copies.(city policy) . MISCELLANEOUS To speed up the review process, note on this list (or a copy) where each correction item has been addressed, i.e., plan sheet, note or detail number, calculation page, etc. Please indicate here if any changes have been made to the plans that are not a result of corrections from this list. If there are other changes, please briefly describe them and where they are located in the plans. Have changes been made to the plans not resulting from this correction list? Please indicate: El Yes ONo 26. The jurisdiction has contracted with Esgil Corporation located at 9320 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 208, San Diego, California 92123; telephone number of 619/560-1468, to perform the plan review for your project. If you have any questions regarding these plan review items, please contact David Yao at Esgil Corporation. Thank you. Carlsbad 95-1870 12/29/95 VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE JURISDICTION: Carlsbad PLAN CHECK NO.: 95-1870 PREPARED BY: David Yao DATE: 12/29/95 BUILDING ADDRESS:. 2614 Unicornio Street BUILDING OCCUPANCY: R-3/M-1 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-N BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE (sq. ft.) MULTIPLIER ($) living 12091 aaraae 1599 Air Conditioning Fire Sprinklers I TOTAL VALUE I I per permit application I 176,276.00 UBC Building Permit Fee: UBC Plan Check Fee: Comments: $ 909.00 $ 590.85 Sheet I of I valuefee.dot ADDRESS: 2015 in Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009 PHONE: (6191438-1161. Ext. 93 i-S itv of Carlsbad BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST - 5- PLANCHECK NO. CB 5'/2 70 BUILDING ADDRESS: a PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NL EST. VALUE____________ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DENIAL APPROVAL The Item you have submitted for review has been approved. The approval Is based on plane, Information and/or specifications provided In your submittal; therefore any changes to these items after this date, Including field modifications, must be reviewed by this office to insure continued conformance with applicable codes. Please review carefully all comments attached, as failure to comply with Instructions In this report can result In suspension of permit to build. 0 A Right-cl-Way permit is required prior to construction of the following improvements: Pleasejee the attached report of deficiencies marked with Make necessafy corrections to plans or specifications for compliance with applicable codes and standards. Submit corrected plans and/or specifications to this office for review. By: Date:________ By:__ Date:________ By: Date:________ AT1ACHMENTS ENGINEERING DEPT. CONTACT PERSON Dedication Al]ØG'on Dedication 0hE4' O ImprovementApplicadon O Improvement Checklist O Future Improvement Agreement O Grading Permit Application El Grading Submittal Checklist O Right of Way Permit Application O RIght of Way Permit Submittal Checklist and Information Shell O sewer Fee Information Sheet p.DocmcHKLs1eP0001.FRM A4 REVelhll/W 2075 Las Palmas Dr. • Carlsbad. CA 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • FAX (619) 438-0894 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST dv 3rd/ 8"DD 1. Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North Arrow D. Property Unes Easements Existing & Proposed Structures E. Easements Existing Street Improvements F. Right-of-Way Width & Adjacent Streets 2. Show on site plan: Drainage Patterns C. Existing Topography Existing & Proposed Slopes O 3. Include note: Surface water to be directed away from the building foundation at a 2% gradient for no less than 5' or 2/3 the distance to the property line (whichever is less). [Per 1985 UBC 2907(d)51. On graded sites, the top of any exterior foundation shall extend above the elevation of the street gutter at point of discharge or the inlet of an approved drainage device a minimum of 12 inches plus two percent" (per 1990 UBC 2907(d)5.). I1 0 0 4. Include on title sheet Site address Assessor's Parcel Number Legal Description For commercial/Industrial buildings and tenant Improvement projects, include: Total building square footage with the square footage for each different use, existing sewer permits showing square footage of different uses (manufacturing, warehouse, office, etc.) previously approved. OCISTING PERMIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION PD0cScHKL$1\IPOOO1.FRM Peg. I 4 REV OIIIS4 BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1 `ndV 3 r d,/ DISCRETIONARY APPROVAL COMPLIANCE 5. Project does not comply with the following Engineering Conditions of approval for Project No. Conditions were compiled with by: Date:_________________ DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS o 6. Dedication for all Street Rights-of-Way adjacent to the building site and any storm drain or utility easements on the building site is required for all new buildings and for remodels with a value at or exceeding $____________ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.030. Dedication required as follows: Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the dedication process. Provide the completed application form and the requirements On the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Dedication completed by Date:__________ 0~/O IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 7a. All needed public Improvements upon and adjacent to the building site must be constructed at time of building construction whenever the value of the construction exceeds $ -pursuant to Code Section 18.40.040. Public improvements required as follows: Plee hay, a registered Civil Engineer prepare appropriate Improvement plans and submit them together with the requirements on the attached checklist for a separate planchsck process through the Engineering Department. improvement plans must be approved, appropriate securities posted and fees paid prior to issuance of permit Attached please find an application form and submittal checklist for the public improvements requirements. Provide the completed application form and the requirements on the checklist at the time of resubmittal. Improvement Plans signed ey. (e-1 Date: P30CeC$4ICLS15110OOI.F Pegs 2 d 4 REV O5111/S BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST r I §tV ad,/ r 1!i 7b. Caikiei of the ublle Imarnmamants mv ha dAfArrnd rniruAnt to mda Sae4knln 1640. Please submit a recent property title report or current grant deed on the property and processing fee of $__________________ so we may prepare the necessary Future Improvement Agreement. This agreement must be signed, notarized and approved by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. Future public improvements required as follows:____________________________ Improvement Plans signed by: Date:__________ 7c. Enclosed please find your Future Improvement Agreement Please return signed and notarized Agreement to the Engineering Department. Future Improvement Agreement completed by: 74M Date: 7d. No Public Improvements required. SPECIAL NOTE: Damaged or defective-imorovements found adlacent to building site must be reoaired to the satisfaction of the City Inspector prior to occuoancv. GRADING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS The conditions that invoke the need for a grading permit are found in Section 11.06.030 of the Municipal Code. O 0 0 Ba. Inadequate Information available on Site Plan to make a determination on grading requirements. Indude accurate grading quantities (cut, fill import, export). 0 0 Sb. Grading Permit required. A separate grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer must be Submitted together with the completed application form attached. NOTE: The Grading Permit must be Issued and rough grading approval obtained prior to issuance of a Buildlno Permit / GradIng Inspector sign off by: - Date: IS! 0 0 Sc. No Grading Permit required. k) & C. I -i A- PWOc$\c*UU.$1SPOOOISRM Pags 3 4 av OanIISs BUILDING PLANCHECK CHECKLIST 1 sl'2nd/ 3r d' D.D MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS 9. A RIGHTOF.WAY PERMIT is required to do work in City Right-of-Way and/or private work adjacent to the public Right-of-Way. Types of work include, but are not limited to: street improvements, trees, driveways, tieing into public storm drain, sewer and water utilities. A separate Right-of-Way permit Issued by the Engineering Department is required for the following: A SEWER PERMIT is required concurrent with the building permit issuance. The fee is noted in the fees section on the following page. INDUSTRIAL WASTE PERMIT is required. Applicant must complete Industrial Waste Permit Application Form and submit for City approval prior to issuance of a Permit. Industrial waste permit accepted by: (1 Date: p.w0cscHm.s1.poosI,R. Pegs 4 4 REVOMIJIN 00 =$ =-e--. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING REVIEW SECTION. FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET bgoo 0 Estimate based on unconfirmed information from applicant. . Calculation based on building piancheck plan submittal. •_77._W I Address: (o / 4- 4 -v4L1,i Bldg. Permit No. Prepared by/t1 fl- Date: /5 ?( Checked by Date: EDU CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. TvnAs of U c 1'z / oni I.e. / Total EDU's: / AOl CALCULATIONS: List types and square footages for all uses. Types of Use:______ . SFt7Units:1' ADTs: / Total ADVs / FEES REQUIRED: PUBUC FACILITIES FEE REQUIRED /YES 0 NO (See Building Department for amount) WITHIN CFD: DYES (no bridge & thoroughfare fee. ONO reduced Traffic Impact Fee) 'RK-lN-LIEU FEE PARK AREA:________ FEE/UNIT: X NO. UNITS:______ 2.TRAFF1C IMPACT FEE . . A ADTs/UNITS: . ( X FEE/ADT: ?i' go s 6'7-U BRIDGE AND THOROUGHFARE FEE ADT's/UNITS:I FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FEE SORT.: / üfl1t SEWER FEE PERMIT No.'—.. EDU's: X FEE/EDU: ' BENEFIT AREA: DRAINAGE BASIN:______ EDU's: G. DRAINAGE FEES PLDA D ACRES: (0. I'WER LATERAL ($2,500 DEPOSIT) (8. WATER FEE EDU's: I X FEE/EDU:_- HIGH /LOWK' 00 X FEE/AC:$ X FEE/ADT:________ ZONE:________ X FEE/SQ.FT.3/O I I =$_72 60 TOTAL OF ABOVE FEES*: $_4 02 I *NOTE: This calculation shoot Is NOT a complete list of all fees which may be duo. Dedications and improvements may also be required with Building Permits. X FEE/EDU.j P:\D0CSMISF0RMS\0P0002.FRM . REV 01/04/95 PLANNING aIEaa1ST Plan Check No.'95/?0Md$3Q7_f/ Oil'lcor,'o St-. 0 Planner DAVID RICK Phone 438-1161 ext. $328 (Name) APN: M I Type of Project and Use I"Pc.) St Zone -' Facilities Management Zone 6 (D (inI) •__ c1'e1C (I1 property in, comp__lete SPECIAL TAX CALCULATION WORKSHEET provided by Building Department.) q I- : Item Complete IWO .! .! [tern Incomplete - Needs your action 1,2,3 Number in circle indicates plancheck number where deficiency was identified d[3 0 L Envigonwi.ntal Review Required YES NO TYPE______ DATE OF COMPLETION: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval 0 Disaetionazy Action Required YES - NO ...LTYPE______ APPROVALJRESO. NO. _____ DATE: PROJECT NO. OTHER RELATED CASES: Compliance with conditions of approval? If not, state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval___________________________________ California Coastal Ccmr.kon Permit Reqsthed YES - NO DATE OF APPROVAL: San Diego Coast District, 3111 Camino Del Rio North, Suite 200, San Diego, CA. 92108-1725 (619) 521-8036 Compliance with conditions of approval? If no; state conditions which require action. Conditions of Approval / ' 0 0 [nclusionary Housing Fee xeçred: YES NO (Effective date of tnàlusionaxy Housing. Ordinance- May 21, 1993.) Site Plaii WM Provide a fully dimensioned site plan drawn to scale. Show: North arrow, property lines, easements, existing and proposed structures, streets, existing street improvements, right-of-way width, dimensioned setbacks and existing topographical lines. Provide Legal description of property, and assessor's parcel number. Zoning: /0o 1. Setbacks: Front: Required Ent. Side: Required 'Pr t.Sreet-Side: Required Rear: Required Lot coverage: Required Height: Required Parking: Spaces Required Guest Spaces Required Shown _22i Shown /,I. Shown 2.1' I7.4' Shown 57' 04002? Shown /?fo 3o' Shown Shown 25X 2-i Shown 0 00 Additional Comments 6~3OKTO ISSUE AND ENTERED AppROvALINTocoMpuTEa _ DATE PLNcK.FRM - Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc. February 6, 1996 RADNO Mr. Mark Goethals FEB 121996 9255 Towne Center Drive San Diego, CA 92121-3002 R E C E V SUBJECT: EXPANSION TESTING & REMEDIAL GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS Single Family Residence 2614 Unicornio Street Carlsbad, California Work Order No. 023401.23B Dear Mr. Goethais: Per your request, a representative sample of the near surface soils was obtained on February 2, 1996 by our field geologist and transported to our laboratory for testing. Expansion testing was performed on the on-site near surface soils, remolded and tested under a surcharge of 144 lb/ft2, in accordance with Uniform Building Code Standard No. 29-2. The test results indicated an expansion index of SO or medium expansion potential. Due to the possibility the subject lot is a bedrock/fill transition lot, the age of the subject lot (+20 years), and the expansiveness of the underlying earth materials, it is our opinion the subject lot should be overexcavated. The overexcavation will require a minimum 2.5-ft overexcavation from the finish pad elevation and extending a minimum of 5-ft outside of the building footprint. The exposed surface should be scarified a minimum of 1-ft below overexcavation elevation, moisture conditioned (minimum of optimum moisture), and recompacted to +90% relative compaction prior to placement and compaction of fill material. Total and differential settlements of footings supported on the recommended zone of properly compacted fill materials are not expected to exceed 1-inch and 1/2-inches, respectively. This settlement should occur primarily during construction. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. No. RCE 23464 Harrison General Manager 4on einhart, RCE Civil Engineer Expires: _l.3It3J* CA 27463 Enterprise Circle West • Temecula . CA 92590 . TEL(909)676-8337 • FAX(9Q9)676 - APPENDIX A References GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. W.O. #02340123B REFERENCES Benton Engineering, Inc.: "Project No.70-10-28D, County Permit No. 13785, Interim Report on Compacted Filled Ground and Classification of Soil Conditions, Lots 1 to 184, inclusive, 186 to 189, inclusive, 192 to 253, inclusive, and Certain Street Areas, La Costa Meadows Unit No. 1, San Diego County, California", dated October 12, 1971; Benton Engineering, Inc.:"Project No.70-10-28D, (Grading Permit No. L3785), Final Report on Compacted Filled Ground, Lots 92 and 185 of, La Costa Meadows Unit No. 1, San Diego County, California", dated June 28, 1972; Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc., January 11, 1996, "Foundation Plan Review, Single Family Residence, 2614 Unicornio Street, Carlsbad, California", work Order No. 023401.23A; Spec. Drafting; 1/4=1' "Foundation Plan", sheet 2 of 10 and "Foundation Details and Notes" sheet 3 of 10, dated 11-95, GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC W.O. #023481.238 . S - - Geotechnical & Environmental Engineers, Inc. January 11, 1996 Mr. Mark Goethals 9255 Towne Center Drive Sandiego, CA 92121-3002 SUBJECT: FOUNDATION PLAN REVIEW Single Family Residence 2614 Unicornio Street Carlsbad, California Work Order No. 023401.23A Dear Mr. Goethals: Per your request, we have reviewed the 1/4"= 1' scale Foundation Plan, Sheets 2 of 10 and F 3 of 10, dated 11-95, by Spec. Drafting of Encinitas, California, and the soils reports by Benton Engineering (see Appendix "A"). The referenced soils reports, recommend a floating garage slab by separating it from the perimeter footings. A floating slab is not practical nor desirable with the proposed post tension foundation system. It is our opinion the proposed Foundation Plan meets or exceeds the minimum requirements called for in the foundation and slab recommendations presented in the referenced soils reports. The foundation, as shown, should perform adequately for the intended purpose, provided the recommendations contained in the referenced report are followed during, construction of the building. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, A GEOTECHNICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS, INC. I .i. ROE 23484 Xam=s RNarrison General Manager Q1414 OP CA L 3 n T. Reinhart, RCE 23464 ivil Engineer 27463 Enterprise Circle West • Temecula . CA 92590 . TEL(909)676 -8337 FAX(909)676-4583 APPENDIX A References Benton Engineering, Inc.: "Project No.70-10-28D, County Permit No. L3785, Interim Report on Compacted Filled Ground and Classification of Soil Conditions, Lots 1 to 184, inclusive, 186 to 189, inclusive, 192 to 253,. inclusive, and Certain Street Areas, La Costa Meadows Unit No. 1, San Diego County, California", dated October 12, 1971; Benton Engineering, Inc.:"Project No.70-10-28D, (Grading Permit No. L3785), Final Report on Compacted Filled Ground, Lots 92 and 185 of, La Costa Meadows Unit No. 1, San Diego County, California", dated June 28, 1972; Spec. Drafting; 1/4"= 1' "Foundation Plan", sheet 2 of 10 and "Foundation Details and Notes" -sheet 3 of 10, dated 11-95, S PHILIP HENKING BENTON PRESIDENT . CIVIL ENGINEER BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS - FOUNDATIONS 6741 EL CAJON BOULEVARD SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92115 October 12, 1971 SAN DIEGO: 583.5654 LA MEsA 469-5654 Rancho La Costa Route 1, Box 2550 Encinitas, California 92024 Subject: Project No. 70-10-28D County Permit No. 0785 Interim Report on Compacted Filled Ground And Classification of Soil Conditions Lots 1 to 184, inclusive, 186 to 189, inclusive 192 to 2534 inclusive, and Certain Street Areas San Diego County, California Gentlemen: This is to report the results of tests and observations made in order to inspect the compaction of filled ground placed on certain areas of Lots 1 to 5, inclusive, 9 to 15, inclusive, 23 1,4..53. inclusive, 55 to 59, inclusive, 61, 64, 67 to 72, inclusive, 75 to 91, inclusive, 104 to 108, Inclusive, 112 to 119, inclusive, 121 to 154, inclusive, 160, 173 to 184, inclusive,186 to 189, inclusive, 192 to 218, inclusive, 220, 221, 222, 224, 231, 232, 233, 237 to 247, inclusive, and portions of Unfcomio Street, Alga Road, Luclemaga Street, Luciemaga Place, Alisma Street, Antilope Street, Abejorro Street, Grulla Street, Persa Street, Unicornio Way, Unicornio Place, Unicomlo Court, Unicornio Street, Ave Del Paraiso Street, Abedul Street, Abedul Place, and Zodiac Street In La Costa Meadows Unit No. 1, San Diego County, California. Tests were also taken In soils placed as backfill over utility lines in Unit No. 1 and in compacted filled ground placed on Lots 466, 467, 468, 469, and 470 of La Costa Meadows Unit No. 3. Compac- ting of filled ground has not been completed on Lot 185 and the results of final tests and Inspec- tions on this lot will be included in our final report on this unit. The fills on Unit No. 1 reported herein were placed during the period between November 9, 1970 and September 20, 1971. The approximate areas and depths of filled ground placed under our inspection in accordance with the approved specifications are shown on the attached Drawing No. 1, entitled "Location of Compacted Filled Ground." The grading plan used for the placement of filled ground was prepared by Rick Engineering Company and last revised January29, 1971. The approximate locations at which the tests were taken and the final test results are presented on pages 1-1 to 1-43, inclusive, under the "Table of Test Results." A group of 9 tests taken during the Initial grading of Alga Road are included on page 1-43 of the "Table of Test Results." The laboratory determinations of the maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of S1010 .17.81 Prolect No. 70-10-28D -2- Rancho La Costa 1October 12, 1971 the major fill materials are presented on pes 1-1 and 1-2, under the "Laboratory Test Results." Some of the maximum dry densities shown in the "Table of Test Results" were combinations of these. The tests were taken during the weekly periods indicated below Test Number Week Ending . 1 to 12, inclusive . November 14, 1970 . 13 to 48, inclusive November 21, 1970 49 to 79, inclusive November 28, 1970 • 80 to 106, inclusive: . December 5, 1970 107 to 158, inclusive December 12, 1970.. 159 to 200, inclusive . December 19, 1970 201 to 247, inclusive January 2, 1971 248 to 319, inclusive January 9, 1971 320 to 360, inclusive January 16, 1971 361 to 441, inclusive . . January 23, 1971 442 to 552, inclusive January 30, 1971 553 to 629, inclusive February 6, 1971 630 to 705, inclusive February 13, 1971 706 to 774, inclusive February 20, 197.1 775 to 8701 inclusive . February 27, 1971 871 to 947, inclusive March 6, 1971 948 to 1039, inclusive March 13, 1971 1040 to 1121, inclusive March 20, 1971 1122 to 1167, inclusive March 27, 1971 1168 to 1216, inclusive . Apri l 3,1971 1217 to 1232, inclusive April 10, 1971 1233 to 12741 inclusive April 17, 1971 1275 to 12831 inclusive April 24, 1971 1284 May 15, 1971 1285 to 1291, inclusive May 22, 1971 1292 to 1293, inclusive . May 29, 1971 1294 to 1303, inclusive . June 12, 1971 1304 to 13071 Inclusive June 19, 1971 1308 to 1320, inclusive July 17, 1971 1321 to 1329, inclusive. August 7, 1971 1330 to 1335, inclusive- August 14i 1971 1336 to 1350, Inclusive . . August 21, 1971 1351 to 1356, inclusive .. August 28, 1971 1357 and 1358 . . September 11, 1971 1359 to 1370, Inclusive . September 18, 1971 1371 to 1376, Inclusive September 25, 1971 Lots 190 and 191 were not graded and therefore remain at their original natural slope. SENTON ENGINEERING. INC. rroj'ect No. 70-10-28D -3- uc iz, 1971 Rncho La Costa The final results of tests and observations indicate that the compacted filled ground has been placed at 90 percent of the maximum dry density or greater. It has been determined that the fill materials, compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density, have a safe bearing value ou]930 pounds per square foot for one foot wide continuous footings founded at a minimum depth of 'one foot below finish grade and placed five feet or more Inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes. If footings are placed closer to the exposed slopes than 5 feet inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes, these should be deepened one foot below a 1 /2 horizontal to 1 vertical line projected outward and downward from a point 5 feet horizontally Inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes. Tests. indicate that the compacted filled ground is adequate to satisfactorily support the proposed wood frame dwellings without detrimental settlements.. Expansive clay, silty clay, and sandy clay soils were placed in the upper three feet in certain compacted fill areas and also exist in the upper three feet below finished grade in certain cut areas. The final classifications of the soil conditions existing on each lot are presented as follows: Type A - Critically Expansive Soils Lots Lots Ito 16, Inclusive 134 to 149, inclusive inclusive 152, 153, 154 34 to 50, inclusive 158 to 161, inclusive 52 and 53 167. to 176, inclusive 58 to 64, inclusive 179 to 182, inclusive 66, 67, and 68 184, 186 to 189, inclusive 70 to 82, Inclusive 194 to 230, inclusive 87 to 92, inclusive 234, 237 105, 106, 107 239 to 243, Inclusive 117 to 131, Inclusive 246 and 247- 1 21 TM B -Marginally Expansive Soils Lots 17, 51, 56, 57 65, 69, 83, M, 85, 86 23 j. 2Z I& 108, 109, 112 to 115, inclusive Lots 132, 133, 150, 155, 156, 157, 110 177 and 178 183, 192.. 193, 151 162 238, 244 and 248 Type C - Nonexpansive Soils Lots •. Lots 33 163 to 166, Inclusive 94 to 98, inclusive 231, 232, 233, 235, 2361 245 100 to 103incluslve 249 to 253, Inclusive 111, 116 8ENTOM ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10.-28D -4- October 12, 1971 Rancho La Costa It is recommended that the following special design and precautions be token for the houses to. be constructed on the above lots: -. Type A Lots Avoid the use of isolated interior piers. Use 'continuous footings throughout, and place these at a minimum depth of two feet below the lowest ad jacent exterior final ground surface. Reinforce and interconnect continuously with steel bars all interior and exterior footings with one 15 bar at 3 inches above the bottom of the footings and one 05 bar placed 1 1/2 inches below the top of the stems of the footings. Exercise every effort to assure that the soil under the Foundations and slobs has a uniform moisture content, 1 percent to 3 percent greater than optimum through- out the top 3 feet below finished grade at the time of placing foundations and slab. Use raised wooden floors that span between continuous footings, or use all concrete slabs with 6 x 6 — 10/10 welded wire fabric and provide a minimum of 4 inches of clean sand beneath all concrete slab. A moisture barrier should be provided In the sand layer 2 inches below slabs under living areas. Separate garage slabs from perimeter footings by a 1/2 inch thickness of con- struction felt or equivalent, to allow independent movement of garage slab relative to perimeter footings. Assure complete separation by extending the felt over the full depth of the front thickened edge of the garage slab. Also, cut off the garage door stops at least 1/2 inch above the slab. Provide positive drainage away from all perimeter footings to a horizontal distance of at least 6 feet outside the house walls. Type B Lots Those lots listed as Type B lots should follow all the above-listed recommendations with the two following exceptions: - The continuous footings may be placed at a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest adjacent exterior final ground surface rather than the two feet. recommended For Type A lots. Single 04 bars placed as directed (above) near tops and bottoms of all interior and exterior Footings may be substituted for the 15 bars recommended for Type A lots. Recommendations 3 to 6, inclusive, as listed for Type A lots, are also applicable to the Type Blots. BeNION ENGINEERING. INC. JroIect No. 7O-1O-28D -5- October 12.. 1971 Rancho LaCosta Only nonoxpanslve soil conditions were observed in the upper three feet on the Type Clots and therefore specially dosigned footings and slabs will not be required on these lots. Respectfully submitted, : BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. r : By R. C. Remer Reviewed Philip H. Benton, Civil Engineer Distr: (7) Addressee (2) Rancho La Costa, Inc. Attention: Mr. Burton L. Kramer Rick Engineering Company San Diego County Building Inspection Vista Office BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. APPLIED SOIL MECHANICS FOUNDATIONS 5741 EL CAJON BOULEVARD SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92115 PHILIP HENKING BENTON S" (.ia SB) * June 201 I77 La Costa Land Company Costa Del Mar Road Rancho Lai Costa, CaliFornia 92008 Subject: Project No. 70-10-28D (Grading Permit L 3785) Final Report on Compacted Filled Ground Lots 92 and 185 of La Costa Meadow's Unit No. San Diego, California Gentlemen: This is to report the final results of tests and observations made in order to inspect the compaction of filled ground placed on certain areas of Lots 92 and 185 in La Costa Meadows Unit No. 'I. The results of tests and observations made to inspect the compaction of filled ground placed during the major grading of this subdivision and special recommendations for construction on expansive soils were included in our interim report on this project dated October 12, 1971. This report includes the results of test Nos. 1377 to 1380, Inclusive, taken in compacted filled ground placed on Lots 92 and 185. These fills were placed on April 24, 1972 and June 13, 1972. This report includes all test data and Information not previously reported and completes our final report on La Costa Meadows Unit No. I. - The approximate areas and depths of filled ground placed under our inspection in accordance with the approved specifications are shown on the attached Drawing No. 1, entitled Location of Compacted Filled Ground. The grading plan used For the placement of filled ground was pre- pared by Rick Engineering Company and last revised January 29, 1971. The approximate locations at which test Nos. 1377 to 1380, inclusive, were taken and the Final lest results were presented on page 1-44, under the "Table of Test Results." Test No, 1 to 1376, inclusive, were presented on pages 1-1 to T-43, inclusive, of our previous report. The laboratory determinations of the maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the major fill materials placed during this recent grading period are presented on page 1-1 under the "Labora- tory Test Results.' Test Nos. 1377 to 1380, inclusive, reported herein, were taken on the dates Indicated below: Test Number Date 1377 and 1378 April 24, 1972 1379 and 1380 June 13, 1972 Reviewed by Project No. 70-10-28D -2- June 28, 1972 Lc-Costa Meadows Unit No. 1 .. The final results of tests and observations Indicate that the compacted filled ground has been placed at 90 percent of maximum dry density or greater. It has been determined that the fill materials, compacted to 90 percent of the maximum dry density, have a safe bearing value of 1930 pounds per square foot for one foot wide continuous footings founded at a minimum depth and placed 5 feet or more inside the top of the compacted filled ground slopes. If footings are placed closer to the exposed slopes than 5 feet Inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes, these should be deepened one foot below a 1 1/2 horizontal to 1 vertical line projected outward and downward from a point 5 feet horizontally inside the top of compacted filled ground slopes. Tests Indicate that the compacted filled ground is adequate to support the proposed wood frame dwellings without detrimental settlements. Critically expansive soils exist in the upper three feet below finished grade on.Lots 92 and 185. Therefore the special design and precautions presented for Type MA" lots In our previous Interim report dated October 12, 1971 are recommended for buildings constructed on these two lots. Respectfully submitted, BENTON ENGINEERING, INC. R. C. Remer. Philip H. Benton,, Civil Lngineer Dlstr: (4) Addresses (1) La Costa Land Company Attention: Mr. Burton L. Kramer Rick Engineering Company San Diego County Building Inspection, Vista Office (1) San Diego County Engineering Department Attention: Mr. Joe Sovolla RC R/PHB/ew BEN1ON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No 70-10-28D ,11 October 12, 1971 .L,a Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS. Approx- Depth Maximum • Imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks I 57 2 13.9 104.8 111.9 93.6 2 58 2 17.2 107.9 111.9 96.4 3 57 6 14.5 102.0 111.9 91.0 4 59 . . 4 12.1 107.0 .111.9 95.5 5 58. 6 12.4 109.4 117.8 92.7 6 57 . . 10 16.6 100.8 111.9 90.0 7 58. 10 18.3 87.3 111.9 78.0 Reworked 8 59 8 14.3 101.4 111.0 91.4 9 57 . 14 17.6 . 91.8 111.9. 82.7 Reworked to 32*** . 2 17.0 105.3 116.0 . 90.7 11 32*** 4 14.2 108.1 116.0 93.2 12 35 2 15.4 109.9 116.0 94.6 13 Inter. Unicomio 2 13.7 109.8 120.2 91.3 Ave. & Del Paraisà . 14 33*** 2 15.0 107.8 116.0 92.9 15 14 4 17.7 105.3 116.0 90.7 16 12 2 17.6 108.5 116.0 93.6 17 32*** 8 15.7 108.3 120.2 90.1 18 34*** .• 4 . 17.3 106.0 116.0 91.3 19 33 6 15.2 . 107.5 118.1 91.0 20 35 6 17.0 106.3 116.0 91.5 21 Ave Del Paraiso 6 14.9 107.8 116.0 92.9 & Unicomlo St. • Inter. 22 13 2 15.6 108.0 119.0 90.8 23 14 .8 15.1 115.1 120.2 95.7 24 34 8 15.0 107.9 116.0 93.0 25 13 6 15.1 • 108.9 120.2 90.5 26 .2 12 • 15.7 115.3 120.2 95.8 27 33 10 17.2 105.9 116.0: • 91.1 28 35 10 9.5 104.3 116.0 89.9 .R.worked 29 35 10 • 14.2 104.9 116.0 90.4 Ch.ckon128 30 34 • 12 16.2 110.8 120.2 92.1 31 33 14 10.2 107.2 116.0 92.4 32 Ave Del Paraiso 10 13.5 105.2 116.0 90.6 & Unicomio St. 33 14 12 16.8 104.0 115,3 • 90.1 34 32 16 14.9 105.2 115.3 91.2 35 14 14.9 108.4 116.0 93.5 ' Indicates tiest token In area for Sewer Pump Station near Lot 32 BENYON ENGINEERING. INC. No. 70-10-28D Lc; Costa Meadows No. 1 October 12, 1971 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. . Lot No. in Feet % dry.wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks .36 34 16 16.2 105.1 116.0 90.6 37 32 20 13.8 105.0 116.0 90.4 38 64 2 . 14.8 112.8 119.0 . 94.8 39 64 . 4 14.1 108.1 119.0 90.8 40 . 185 .2 14.2 109.6 119.0 92.2 41 186 2 14.1 112.8 119.0 94.8 42 33 18 . 16.0 103.8 113.7 91.3 43 12 6 11.2 103.9 113.1 91.8 44 13 10 12.4 105.1 113.1 92.8 45 11 2 9.6 109.1 113.1 96.5 46 12 tO 11.0 103.9 113.2 91.6 47 13 14 9.6 102.8 115.3 89.2 Reworked 48 13 14 13.0 110.3 115.3 95.7 Checkon: 49 11 6 I'll- .1 105.4 116.0 90.7 50 . 132 2 12.4 114.1 120.2 94.9 51 184 2 13.8 101.8 111.3 91.4 52 184 6 13.9 125.0: 137.8 90.6 53 183 4 14.1 112.0 120.2 93.1 54 184 . 10 15.9 113.5 120.2 94.4 55 183 . . 8 15.6 112.4 .120.2 93.5 56 1.83 12 15.4 112.5 120.2 93.6 57 132. 4 12.5 102.0 111.0 91.9 58 131 4 11.2 113.8 120.2 94.5 59 12 14 8.8 110.3 116.0 . 95.0 60 Unicornio Way 2 11.5 111.2 120.2 92.5 61 13 18 12.3 110.2 116.0 95.0 62 132 8 16.3 106.6 116.0 91.8 63 11 10 12.0 . 108.9 116.0 93.8 64 Unicomio Way 4 10.3 105.5 116.0 90.9 65 10 4 16.1 104.1 115.3 . 90.2 66 12 18 12.7 116.8 120.2 97.1. 67 182 2 . 14.0 119.8 129.0 92.7 68 187 4 14.3 118.9 129.0 92.1 69 186 6. 13.8 118.2 129.0 91.6 70 13 . 22 16.8 104.1 111.1 93.6 71 . - 141 2 11.7 106.9 111.0 96.2 72 142 2 13.1 113.8 120.2 94.5 73 132 12 16,7 110.1 120.2 91.6 74 9 4 10.1 102.0 115.3 88.4 Reworked 75 9 4 12.2 102.9 . 111.0 92.6 check on 76 11 . 14 12.4 103.0 111.0 92.7 77 182 6 . 12.2 108.0 111.3 97.0 78 184 14 12.2 • 117.8 124.5 94.6 79 183 16 12.1 . 111.0 117.8 94.2 • . BENTON ENGINEERINC.. 'SC. Project No. 701U-28i) 4a Costa Meadows No. 1 T-3 October 12, 1971 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Depth of Fill Field Dry at Test Moisture Density in Feet % dry wt lb/cu fl - -I 10 13.5 100.5 2 12.2 99.9 2 14.1 110.4 4 15.0 101.7 6 16.9 108.7 8 14.5 102.8 10 14.5 107.7 12 14.3 105.0 14 14.8 102.9 14 16.9 1 12.3 3 18.2 114,4 7 13.9 117.6 2 15.9 115.2 4 15.9 114.9 4 14.9 106.8 Maximum Dry Dnsily lb/cu ft 111.0 111.0 120.2 111.0 120.2 111.0 116.2 115.3 113.6 124.5 124.5 124.5 124.5 124.5 115.3 Percent Compaction Remarks 90.6. Check on #7 90.0 91.8 91.6 90.4 92.6 92.6 91.0 90 .,6 90.1 . Check on#9 91.8 94.4 . . 92.4 92.3 92.6 8 17.0 104.9 115.3 90.8 12 15.4. 108.5 115.3 94.0 8 15.3 107.0 115.3 92.8 2 9.4 104.5 115.3 90.5 4 9.1 106.3 115.3 92.1 6 12.7 106.0 115.3 91.9 2 7.4 99.8 111.0 89.9 Reworked 14 16.3 113.9 124.5 91.4 18 16.7 116.7 124.5 93.7 12 13.6 107.0 117.8 90.9 22 12.6 117.9 124.5 94.6 16 12.5 118.6 124.5 . 95.2 2 11.7 103.6 111.0 93.4 . Check on#10 4 11.1 . 101.8 111.0 91.8 8 10.4 106.9 115.3 92.5 6 12.1 108.8 115.3 94.3 2 . 10.9 106.3 115.3 92.2 4 8.4 105.2 111.0 94.6 20 11.0 106.6 111.0 96.0 4 15.3 107.3 115.3 93.0 26 15.6 114.9 124.5 92.3 . BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Approx- imate Test Location No. Lot No. 80 58 81. 52. 82 27. 83 26. 84 27 85. 26 36 27 87 26 88 .27 89 57 90 56 91 56 92 70 93 .71 94 Unicomio P1. & Unicomlo St. 95 9 96 9 97 Uncomio P1. & Unicomlo St.. 98 143 99 143 100 143 101 144 102 58 103. 58 104 59 105 58 106 59 107 144 108 109 5 110 144 111 Unicornio Way .& Perso Street. 112 Unicomlo Way & Persa Street 113 Lot Line 11 & 12 114 2 115 57 Project No. 70Li-81) Lp Costa Meadows No. 1 1-4 October 12, 1971 Test No. TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) APPr0X Depth . Maximum imate of FIN Field Dry Dry Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent : Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 58 182 184 186. 187 51 50 49. 183 184 186 181 51 48 285 27 29 Luciemaga St. Opp. Lot 196 Luciernoga St. Opp. Lot 196 Luciernaga St. Opp. Lot 196 192 46 .49 50 26 26 27 27 26 28 27 28 26 31 35 34 15 14 26 15.1 119.5 124.5 96.0 14 13.8 105.7 115.7 91.4 18 13.8 105.2. 115.7 91.2 10 13.7 105.0 115.7 90.9 8 14.2 100.8 111.3 . 90.5 2 13.6 106.1 111.3 . 95.2 4 12.9 108.8 111.3 97.8 2 15.5 108.9 111.3 97.7 20 14.8 105.3 111.9 94.2 22 13.3 101.8 111.3 91.4 14 12.4 . 111.5 120.6 . 92.3 4 11.2 111.7 120.6 92.6 6 11.8 11.0.7 120.6 .91.7 4 10.9 103.4 114.1 90.6 3 8.7 97.0 111.0 88.2 14 14.2 106.1 115.3 91.9 3 14.6 105,6 115.3 91.4 2 .12.4 106.8 115.5 92.3 4 12.3 106.1 115.5 93.7 6 12.4 106.4 115.5 92.1 2 17.1 102.1 .111.0 92.0 1 . 16.0 111.6 120.6 92.4 6 14.0 107.8 115.5 93.3 8 15.1 116.0 120.6 96.1 16 13.6 . 98.2 108.7 90.4 20 16.7 . 106.5 115.3 92.2 18 12.1 105.3 115.3 91.4 22 1.3 104.9 111.0 94.4 24 13.9 102.3 111.0 92.2 7 12.4 111.3 115.3 96.5 .26 .14.7 104.6 111.0 94.2 2. 14.3 105.8 111.0 95.4 28 15.5 102.5 113.1 90.6 1 1.1.5 : 112.2 118.4 94.7 18 14.4 101.1 111.0 91.0 20 9.7 105.8 116.2 91.0 2 13.6 102.3 113.6 90.0 16 13.9 107.6 116.2 92.6 fl6 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 Reworked Check on 013' ENTOr4 ENGINEERING. iNC. Project No. 70-1028D 1-5 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meodows No. 1 • TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth WxImum mote of Fill Field Dry. Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft 154 Inter. Luciernago 10 14.9 111.3 120.6 St. & Court 155 141 6 11.3 102.8 111.0 156 143 .10 14.0 106.7 115.3 157 142 6 9.3 100.9 111.0 158 144 10 13.8 107.1 115.3 159 141 10 16.2 107.8 115.3 160 143 14 13.6 105.1 115.3 161 IJnicornioSt. . .8 15.3 105.3 115.3 8 Persa St. 162 105 2 15.5 110.4 119.0 163 2 8 11.2 103.2 . 113.1 164 104 . 2 16.4 107.6 119.0 165 2 12 11.7 106.9 115.3 166 105 6 12.4 100.3 111.0 167 3 2 17.3 .104.8 115.3 168 104 6 . 11.3 103.3 111.0 169 4 . 4 17.4 103.2 111.0 170 105 10 10.7 104.5 115.3 171 5 12 . 11.8 105.1 115.3 172 104 10 10.6 108.1 115.3 173 106 4 .8.9 105.7 116.0 174 104 14 . 16.0 112.4 118.9 175 UnicomioSt. 2** 13.1 105.3 115.3 Sta 28+00 Opp. Lot 176 UnicomioSt. 2** 12.7 107.8 115.3 Sta. 24+75 177 UnicomioSt. 2** 13.2 108.5 117.4 Sta. 21+50 178 Del Paralso St. 2** 19.4 102.2 115.3 Sta. 0+50 . 179 Rear Lot 34 2** 16.1 99.4 113.1 180 28 11 .14.6 . 108.1 117.4 181 29 7 .14.0 115.9 120.6 182 25 4 118 99.2 110.0 183 27 30 15.5 999 111.0 2' over storm drain pipe Percent Compaction Remarks 92.2. 92.5 92.4 90.9 92.8 93.3 91.0 91.2 92.6 91.2 90.4 92.6 90.3 90.7 93.1 93.0 90.6 91.1 93.7 91.2 94.4 91.4 93.3 92.5 88.6 87.9 92.1 96.0 90.2 90.1. Reworke Reworke BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-1028D 1-6 October 12, 1971 ta'Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test • Moisture Density Density No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu ft Percent Compaction Remarks 184 26 32 14.8 110.8 116.9 94.8 185 28 15 13.4 108.0 116.9. 92.4 186 30 1 13.5 110.3 117.4 93.9 187 31 . 5 12.8 103.2 114.2 90.2 188 32 24 21.4 96.0 112.8 .85.1 189 Rear Lot 34 2** 17.0 103.0 111.0 92.6 190 30 5 20.6 100.1 111.0 90.1 191 35 22 20.8 101.7 112.8 90.1 192 33 2 16.2 108.5 117.4 92.4 193 Del PorolsoSt. 2** 12.8 103.8 111.0 93.4 Sta. 0+50 194 25 8 13.2 106.2 114.2 92.9 195 27 34 14.4 106.6 117.4 90.8 196 29 11 16.6 99.0 111.0 90.1 197 28 19 19.2 101.0 111.0 91.0 198 33 22 12.0 102.7 111.0 92.5 199 35 22 18.1 95.7 111.0 86.1 200 26 36 15.6 107.1 115.1 93.0 201 35 22 19.8 102.2 111.3 91.9 202 33 22 15.8 109.7 115.1 95.1 203 Ave Del Paraiso 14 16.4 99.1 110.0 90.0 & Unicornlo St. 204 31 9 12.7 95.4 111.0 85.9 205 132 16 16.1 . 98.3 111.0 88.6 206 128 . 2 14.7 104.2 115.1 90.5 207 25 12 17.1 106.1 117.4 90.4 208 27 38 15.3 111.1 120.2 92.4 209 130 2 14.6 106.1 115.1 92.1 210 129 4 15.8 103.5 111.3 92.9 211 131 . 4 16.6 1029 111.3 92.4 212 31 9 . 18.1 108.4 120.2 90.0 .213 26 40 13.2 106.9 117.4 91.0 214 32 24 12.2 110.2 120.2 91.6 215 28 23 12.4 103.8 115.1 90.0 216 32 . 28 19.2 100.9 111.0 90.8 217 25 16 146 . 99.2 108.6 91.4 ** 2' over storm drain pipe Reworked Check on 117S Check on 117E Reworked Check on #19( Reworked Reworked Check on 20 Check on 018: BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Prefect No. 7010-28D 17 October 12, 1971 LaCosta Meodows No. 1 Approx- imate Test Location No. Lot No. TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Depth Maximum of Fill Field Dry Dry at Test Moisture Density Density in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Percent Compaction Remarks 218 24 . 2 9.6 99.3 108.6 91.5 219 70 6 14.2 106.2 115.7 91.6 220 71 8 18.4 89.4 115.7 85.1 221 70 10 17.9 102.2 115.7 88.2 222 9 16 13.0 105.8 116.0 91.1 223 10 8 9.5 93.7 111.0 84.4 224 10 . 8 11.4 100.9 111.0 90.9 225 UnicorntoPl. 12 18.2 106.3 116.0 91.7 &UnlcornloSt. 226 11 18 9.9 101.9 111.0 91.6 227 9 20 18.8 98.0 108.9 90.0 228 30 9 17.3 96.1 106.4 90.3 229 36 2 . 18.2 103.2 112.8 91.4 230 31 13 23.0 97.0 107.8 - 90.0 231 34 24 13.6 105.2 116.2 90.4 232 9 24 12.1 104.8 112.3 93.2 233 35 26 18.0 96.0 106.4 90.2 234 71 8 12.9 100.8 111.3 90.6 235 70 10 13.0. 102.2 111.3 91.7 236 35 30 15.9 99.9 109.3 91.3 237 36 6 10;2 . 101.1 111.2 90.9 238 34 28 16.6 101.4 111.2 . 91.1 239 36 10 9.9 111.9 116.0 96.4 240 33 26 11.5 101.2 111.2 91.0 241 31 17 18.9 97.4 106.4 91.4 242 32 32 20.3. 99.6 110.0 90.6 243 71 12 . 17.9 113.8 120.2 94.5 244 34 32 11.6 98.3 106.4 92.5 245 70 14. . 17.9 113.2 120.2' 94.0 246 69 2 17.5 111.0 120.2 92.2 247 71 16 17.3 113.4 120.2 . 94.2 248. 128 6 13.2 105.5 113.7 92.7 249 127 . 1 10.6 100.5 111.0 90.5 250 128 . 10 10.2 105.4 115.3 91.3 251 34 32 12:4 . 103.3 114.8 90.0 252 33 30 13.4 100.9 111.8 .. 90.1 253 35 34 . 13.4 . 102.7 113.7 .90.2 254 34 36 11.5 102.4 1137 90.0 Reworked Reworked Reworked Check on 0223 Check on 0220 Check on #221 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Pr.j.ct No. 70-10280 1-8 October 12, 1971 Ló Câstd Meadows No. 1 Test No. TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth . Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Location at Test Moisture Density Density Lots No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Ft Percent. Compaction Remarks 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 34 36 12.5 103.0 114.5 90.0 127 5 10.8 104.2 115.3 90.2 36 14 13.0 108.9 115.3 94.4 34 40 9.9 103.1 113.7 91.0 43 3 15.9 109.0 120.2 90.6 44 4 15.7 111.0 120.2 92.3 45 4 15.3. 112.1 120.2 . 93.2 132 16 18.7 111.8 117.8 94.8 133 4 16.5 108.7 11910 91.3 132 20 13.5 106.1 115.3 92.0 133 8 12.8 114.0 120.2 94.6 132 24 11.6 107.1 115.3 93.0 134 2 13.4 114.8 117.4 97.7 133 12 10.5 110.6 120.2 91.9 134 6 9.9 111.6 118.9 93.9 133 16 16.0 106.2 117.4 90.5 134 10 13.6 105.6 114.9 91.8 142 10 11.6 110.8 117.4 94.3 141 14 11.2 104.4 115.3 90.5 142 14 12.2 103.0 112.2 91.6 107 2 13.7 104.2 114.9 90.6 140 2 10.0 97.9 108.2 90.4 107 6 17.4 101.9 111.3 91.5 140 6 . 9.1 103.2 109.3 94.4 50 16 15.9 106.2 117.8 90.1 48 12 17.2 111.1 120.6 92.1 49 14 17.5 112.7 120.6 .934 48 16 15.6 113.6 120.6 94.1 47 8 16.7 114.5 . 120.6 95.0 46 9 16.6 113.6 120.6 . 94.1 143 18 14.3 102.3 113.7 90.0 107. 10 15.3 . 96.0 113.7 84.4 143 22 11.3 101.8 111.0 91.6 44 14 14.8 106.0 116.0 91.3 106 . 8 13.8 101.9 111.0 91.7. 144. 18 . 15.0 95.7 106.4 90.0 Check on p205 Reworked BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 107 126 128 36 124 127 125 35 45 44 43 128 126 124 128 127 128 125 128 123 125 124 127 126. 182 185 187 192 Luciernago St. Opp. lot 192 35 36 35 1 128. 126 185 187 124 Project No. 70-10-280 •T-9 October 12, 1971 LaCósta Meadows No. 1 Test No. TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imote of Fill Field Dry Dry Location at Test Moisture Density Density Lot No. in Feat % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Percent Compaction Remarks 10 15.6. 99.9 108.7 92.0 2 9.9 101.3 111.0 91.2 14 . 12.3 104.8 116.0 90.4. 18 10.4 106.3 117.0 91.0 2 10.8 105.0 116.0 90.5 9 14.0 100.9 111.0. 90.9 2 12.5 102.9 113.7 90.6 36 12.4 106.2 117.0 90.7 8 15.7 114.2 120.6 94.6 8 14.9 117.1 120.6 97.0 7 13.7 117.5. 120.6 97.3 14 11.4 96.2 109.3 88.0 6 14.8. 102.1 111.0 92.0 6 . 12.6 105.0 114.8 91.4 14 11.9 103.0 113.7. 90.6 13 16.1 106.4 116.0 91.6 18 16.4 98.9 109.3 90.6 6 13.5 101.5 111.0 91.5 22 13.1 99.4 110.1 90.2 4 14.0 113.4 • 120.6 94.0 10 17.6 107.2 118.3 90.5 10 16.8 . 103.7 111.3 93.1 17 17.8 108.7 118.3 91.8 10 16.3 104.8 115.1 91.1 18 17.7 102.2 111.9 91.3 6 16,6 112.5 120.6 93.2 12 15.6 114.4 120.6 94.8 6 21.6 101.7 111.3 91.3 14 20.5 103.2 111.3 92.6 42 9.9 108.0 . 117.0 92.3 22 16.2 97.0 107.7 90.0 46 20.3 97.4 • 107.7 90.2 26 18.4 103.9. 114.0 91.1 14 15.2 103.1 111.9 - 92.0 10 144 107.0 115.9 92.2 16 11.4 108.9 115.9 93.8 14 . . 16.8 102.9 111.9 92.0 Check on Reworked Check on U BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10-28D iiö October 12, 1971 ;LaCosto Máadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 328 125 14 16.6 103.9 114.8 90.4 329. 126 18 17.2 105.1 . 112.1 . 93.8 330 124 18 .15.2 101.9 109.1 93.2 331 125 18 14.9 111.0 120.6. 92.1 332 124 22 16.6 100.0 111.0 . 90.1 333 123 8 15.5 111.2 1206 92.2 334 127 21 1.0 107.1 118.0 92.2 335 124 26 12.9 105.1 110.6 95.0 336 123 . 12 . 19.4 103.8 110.6 93.7 337 127 25 13.7 101.1 110.6 91.4 338 56 11 . 17.0 115.0 120.6 95.4 339 57 30 14.2 108.1 118.2 91.5 340 . 56 . . 15 . 14.9 112.0 120.6 92.8 341 55 2 14.2 114.8 120.6 95.2 342 126 22 20.2 103.5 114.5 90.3 - 343- 125 22 13.5 96.6 106.4 90.7 344 124 30 18.5 105.9 110.6 95.8 345 123 16 17.6 106.1 110.6 .95.8 346 127 29 22.2 98.4 109.0 90.2 347 126 .26 17.1 103.8 110.6 93.9 348 125 26 18.8 106.9 113.3 94.2 349 49 18 14.7 118.9 129.2 91.9 -350 47 12 15.9 123.1 129.2 95.3 351 45 12 14.7 119.2 129.2 92.3 .352 43 11 15.4 122.2 129.2 94.6 353 124 34 14.0 104.1 113.7 91.6 354 35 50 18.1 100.8 110.6 . 91.0 355 36 26 16.9 97.8 106.4 . 91.9 356 Grulla.St. 2 16.1 104.9 . 110.6 94.9 Opp. Lot 0147- 357 124 . 38 19.3 100.2 111.0 90.5 358 37 2 11.3 99.1 111.0 90.0 359 A19-3 Rd. 2 21.8 102.6 111.9 91.6 Sta. 42+00 S.. . . . 360 AlgjiRd. .. 2 19.1 106.1 111.9 94.8 Sta. 42+00 S. . . 361 Unlcornio St. . 16.2 . 97.1 106.4 •• • 91.3 Opp. Lot 037 . . . BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 701028D 1-11 October 12, 1971 10'Costa M.adows No. 1 Test No. TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Aprox- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Location at Test Moisture Density Density Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu Ft Percent Compaction Remarks 37 36 15 36 127 30 131 10 36 15 14 130 129 29 3 126. 125 123 125 Unlcornio St. Opp. Lot 137 Grulla St. Opp. Lot 0147 127 36 37 36 185. 37 187 48 46 44 33 Unicorñlo St. Opp. Lot 037 37 Unlcom!o St. Opp'. Lot #37 6 18.0 98.5 109.0 90.4 30 17.3 93.1 109.3 85.1 Reworked 6 . 16.3 108.8 115.3 . 94.1 30 16.5 93.4 109.3 85.2 Reworked 33 18.8 97.4 107;8 90.4 13 15.4 105.9 112.8 93.8 8 18.4 103.7 108.0 96.0 12 . 24.2 97.5 106.4 . 91.6 30 18.1 103.6 110.6 93.6 Check on p363 & 10 16.1 . 100.9 106.4 94.1 20 13.4 110.5 117.4 94.1 6 14.6 105.2 112.8 93.6 8 14.6 107.8 117.4 91.8 15 15.9 104.8 113.3 92.6 22.5* 10.3 105.8 116.0 91.1 30 . 19.4 96.1 . 106.4 90.3 30 14.1 97.3 106.4 91.4 20 23.4 96.7 106.4 90.9 34 21.6 97.3 106.4 91.4- 8 11.4 104.7 114.8 91.2 4 24.2 96.0 106.4 . 90.1 37 17.4 99.4 109.3 90.9 34 16.5 103.8 113.7 91.2 10 17.3 109.4 115.6 94.6 38 18.2 102.6 110.6 92.8 14 13.1 . 120.1 . 129.2 93.0 14 17.0 104.7 116.0 90.3 .20 13.1 118.9 129.2 91.9 20 165 108.8 120.6 90.2 13 16.1 110.9 . 120.6. 92.0 12 15.9 112.9 120.6 93.7 34 12.4 100.2 111.0 90.4 12 21.3 99.4 109.3 91.0 18 16.4 98.1 108.5 90.5 16 26.8 96.7 106.4 90.9 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 .395 396 * Finished Grade BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. 1-12 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Maximum Field Dry Dry Moisture Density Density % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu fl 23.8 100.8 110.6 21.4 100.1 110.6 15.7 101.7 112.8 14.9 103.6 113.7 14.3 110.1 117.4. 14.4 106.0 114.0 21.8 102.9 109.4 Depth of Fill at Test in Feet 34 38 2 2 20 14 .4 October 12, 1971 Percent Compaction Remarks 91.1 90.5 90:1 91.1 93.9 93.0 94.1 Project No. 70-10-28D Ca Costa Meadows No. 1 Approx- imate Test Location No. lot No. 397 126 398 125 399 139 400 138 401 133 402 134 403 Unicornio Way • Opp. Lot 1136 404 135 405 134 406 135 407 . 134 408 136 409 135 . 410 136 411 127 412 126 413 125 414 124 415 123 416 Grulla St. Opp. Lot #147 417 Grulla St. Opp. Lot #147 418 147 419 115 420 Unicornlo St. Opp. Lot 037 421 37 422 70 423 71 424 70 425 71 426 70 427 37 428 Uncornio St. Opp. Lot 037 429 1 430 Unlcornio St. & Persa St. 4 13.4 104.2 115.0 90.7 18 16.0 106.5 115.8 92.0 8 12.4 107.1 • 117.0 91.6 22 15.0 110.0 112.1 98.0 4 16.7. 105.1 111.1 94.7 12 15.6 105.9 116.2 91.1 8 14.1 109.3 117.4 93.1 41 16.9 . 100.2 111.0 90.3 38 12.1 . 105.2 113.7 . 92.5 42 15.7 109.2 117.0 93.3 42 18.2 . 106.2 117.0 90.9 24 14.0 102.9 110.6 93.0 6 . 16.9 111.5 115.0 97.1 8 19.5 107.9 110.6 . 97.5 2 15.1 117.0 120.6 97.0 2 14.7 96.6 106.4 90.8 20 ' 15.7 107.9 117.0 92.1 22 17.7 98.4 113.7 86.6 Reworked 18 11.8 119.9 129.2 . 92.8 - 20 14.6 117.4 129.2 90.8 22 11.5 119.4 . 129.2 92.5 24 12.4 116.9 129.2 90.4 26 13.2 98.3 .109.3 904 22 16.0 103.9 113.7 91.4 Check on0421 24 17.5 106.1 113.7 93.2 2 21.8 • 101.6 111.9 90.9 12 14.9 108.7 115.6 94.1 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10-28D 1-13 -LaCosta Meadows No. 1 October 12, 1971 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imote oF Fill Field Dry Dry Test location at Test Moisture Density Density No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Ft Percent Compaction Remarks 431. 123 . 28 14.8 118.1 120.6 97.9 432 124 46 18.1 103.2 113.7 90.8 433 . . 125 46 . 20.6 100.2 111.0 90.4 434 126: 42 16.8 107.9 .117.4 91.9 435 127 45 12.8 105.9 116.0 91.3 436 114 2 13.8 99.1 109.3 90.6 437 115 . 6 15.7 103.0 113.7 90.7 438 114. 6 14.5 108.8 116;0 93.6 439 115 . 10 10.8 104.8 113.7 . . 92.1 440 124 50 12.0 107.5 117.4. 91.6 441 1 6 15.2 110.7 116.7 . 94.9 442 106 12 13.1 107.2 111;4 96.4 443 . 5 16 20.0 100.2 109.9 91.1 44.4 124 54 14.7 105.6 116.0 91.0 445 106 14 13.1 . 110.4 115.6 95.5 446 114 10 15.1 112.6 118.0 95.4. 447 116 2 14.7 98.4 169.0 90.3 448 . . 115 14 15.3 103.7 114.5 90.5 449 114 14 13.8 103.7 114.5 90.5 450 116 6 . 14.7 105.3 114.5 92.0 451 4 8 12.8 106.1 115.5 91.9 452 106 16 12.2. 112.5 118.9 94.6 453 113 4 13.3 104.2 114.5 . 91.1 454 115 18 15.9 105.9 116.0 91.2 455 114 18 15.8 100.9 111.0 91.0 456 116 .10 16.7 106.9 116.0 92.0 457 115 22 14.5 108.9 116.0 93.6 458 114 . 22 12.6 109.9 118.9 92.4 459 116 14 14.8 99.7 109.3 91.2. 460 115 26 16.0 98.9 115.5 . 85.6 461 114 . 26 14.4 104.8 115.3 . 90.9 462 105 14 16.1 101:7 111.0 91.5 - 463 . . 4 12 12.6 1035 113.7 91.0 464 .115 26 20.4 98.4 109.0 90.3 465 116 . 18 15.8 108.1 116.0 93.1 466 115 30 . 20.4 100.1 108.5 92.1 467 117 . . 2 16.5 1039 113.4 91.5. Reworked Check on #46C BENTON ENGINEER' INC Project No. 70-10-28D 1-14 October 2, 1971 .t.a'Costa Mewadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum Imate of Fill Field Dry . Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 468 116 .22 14.6 101.9 112.8 90.4 469 114 30 15.2 106.3 113.7 93.4 470 113 8 16.6 114.0 120.6 94.4 471 117 6 14.9 108.1 115.3 93.6 472 116 26 18.8 102.2 110.6 92.4 473 117 10 11.7 98.6 109.8 90.0 474 104 18 14.8 114.1 118.9 95.9 475 469 **** 4 13.8 107.4 115.3 . 93.0 476 185 18 13.3 118.2 129.2 91.4 477 187 . 24 14.5 117.9 129.2 91.1 478 185 22 14.6 . 116.7 129.2 90.2 479 104 22 12.2 104.8 113.7 92.2 480 3 6 13.1 104.9 115.3 90.9 481 4 16 13.5 . 106.0 115.3 91.9 482 3 . 10 9.8 100.9 111.0 90.9 483 37 26 17.1 107.8 116.0 92.8 484 Unicorno St. 28 13.2 97.9 113.7 86.2 Opp. Lot 037 485 38 4 16.2 103.2 110.6 93.2 486 Unicornio St. 28 13.1 102.5 113.7 90.1 Opp. Lot 037 487 37 30 10.3 98.7 110.1 89.6 488 . 37 30 10.9 100.1 110.1 91.0 489 38 8 16.7 109.9 115.6 . 95.0 490 2 16 9.5 110.8 120.6 91.9 491 1 10 13.0 108.3 116.0 93.5 492 470**** 4 14.8 107.9 113.3 95.1 493 3 14 17.5 . 109.1 113.3 96.2 494 4 20 11.4 - 107.9 116.0 93.0 495 1 14 13.6 104.9 113.3 92.5 496 38 . 10 14.6 116.8 120.6 . 96.8 497 38 12 13.9 107.9 116.0 93.0 498 182 22 10.9 113.9 120.2 94.7 499. 188 4 12.2 109.1 120.6 90.6 500 187 28 12.2 110.9 120.6 92.0 501 186 . 18 13.0 111.9 120.2 93.0 502 183 24 11.9 113.9 120.2. 94.6: 503 182 26 • 11.2 113.9 120.2 94.6 504 Alga Rd; 2 14:2 119.3 129.2 92.4 55+00- 505 Alga Rd. 6 13.2 120.3 129.2 93.2 55+25 Reworked Check on Reworked Check on 048 Indicated test taken on Lot 469 of the adjacent La Costa Meadows Unit Nd. 3. .Project No. 70.10-28D October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. I TABLE OF TEST RESULTS(CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imote oF Fill Field Dry Dry Location at .Test Moisture Density Density Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Ft 14 12.6 105.1. 113.7 92.7 16 9.1 102.1. 113.7 90.2 49. 11.6 104.4 111.3 93.8 46 13.7 107.0 115.9 92.5 18 12.0 107.2 116.0 92.5 20 10.4 . 109.1 117.4 93.0 6 15.3 109.5 116.0 94.5 26 14.1 130.9 137.8 ?5.1 8 16.1 107.9 119.0 90.5 10 13.5 107.1 115.5 92.7 28 15.5. 109.7. 116.0 94.5 18 . 11.6 98.4 109.3 90.0 .8 11.5 100.5 109.3 91.9 8 14.4 116.1 124.8 93.2 32 14.2 115.9 124.8 92.9 22 14.0 122.1 132.0 92.6 26 14.0 120.3 132.0 91.3 32 16.0 103.9 111.9 . 92.9 8 12.9 113.9 124.8 91.4 18 17.0 102.8 113.7 90.5 30 . 18.3 102.8 . 111.9 91.8 12 15.3 105.1 111.9 94.0 14 9.4 111.9 117.4 95.2 2 12.8 107.4 114.0 94.4 16 13.1 106.3 114.0 93.4 18 13.6 104.9 113.7 92.2 4 10.6 108.1 116.0 93.1 22 10.4 107.3 116.0 92.6. 8 12.8 111.2 116.0 95.9 26 12.9 100.0 111.0 90.2 14 .11.7 . 101.8 111.0 91.8 30. 9.9 104.9 113.7 92.3 30 13.2 103.5 .113.7 . 91.2 36 15.4 100.9 111.0 91.0 4 16.6 110.1 1.19.0 . 92.6 30 16.3 110.2 115.5 95.6 * indicates test token on Lt 469 oF the adjacent La Costa Meadows Unit 03 'Test No: 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 ..539 540 541 38 38 127 126 2 470 **** 184 470 192 183 3 469 188 187 186 186 183 181 Luciernago St. Opp. Lot p192 186 188 107 108. 107 107 108 107 108 107 192 107 182 187 193 184 Percent Compaction Remarks BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10-28D 1-16 October 12, 1971 La'Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CO NT.) Approx- imate Test Location No. Lot No. 542 187 543 186 544 184 545 183 546 192 547 Luciernaga St. Opp. Lot p192 548 193 549 186 550 181 551 184 552 luciernaga St Opp. Lot 1192 .553 85 554 84 555 86 556 85 557 84. 558 86 559 85 560 192 561 184 562 187 563 182 564 183 565 181 566 Luciernago St. Opp. Lot 0192 567 193 568 84 569 149 570 186 571 192 572 Luciernoga St. Opp. Lot p192 573 193 574 192 Depth of Fill Field Dry at Test Moisture Density in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft 40 18.0 110.9 34 16.8 109.8 34 17.4 106.9 36 11.2 104.8 18 . 14.8 • 106.1 22 11.6 103.8 .8 14.6 107.9 38 13.0 103.2 12 17.1 110..9 38 15.2 104.3 26 14.5 103.3 2 14.1 106.9 2 14.7 . 104.3 4 . 15.8 106.1 6 18.0 102.8 6 18.1 103.1 8 13.2 104.2 10 16.1 103.9 22 18.0 106.1 42 15.2 103.6 44 15.1 104.9 34 . 13.1 . 110.9 40 14.3 108.9 16 16.4 115.3 30 16.6 109.9 12 13.8 . 106.2 10 13.2 104.0 4 17.8 101.4 42 16.3 103.2 26 14.6 109.1 34 14.8 108.7 16 14.1 110.6 30 13.5 111.0 Maximum Dry Density lb/cu ft 114.6 117.4 117.4 113.7.- 115.5 113.7 115.5 113.7 117.4 113.4 110.6 117.4 113.7 117.4 113.7- 113.7 113.7 113.7 110.6 110.6 110.6 117.9 117.9 120.6 117.9 110.6 111.0 110.6 114.8 116.2 116.2 116.2 116.2 Percent Compaction. Remarks 96.7- 93.4 91.0 92.3 92.0 91.3: 93.4 91.1 94.3 92.0 93.6 90.9 92.1 90.4 90.6 90.9 91.7 91.4 96.1. 93.7 95.0 94.0 92.4 95.7 93.2 96.0- 93.7 91.9 90.0 93.9 . 93.5 95.1 95.5 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 701928D 117 October 12, 1971 La'Costa Meadows No. 1 - TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Location at Test Moisture Density Density Lot No. . in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Alga Rd. 10 14.2 110.1 116.2 55+00 69 71 70 72 123 148 147 148 147 146 145 146 145 122 148 147 - 151 149 122 148 122 146 122 147 145 146.. 39 39 151 149 151 .39 69 71 Uncornio & Perso St. Test No. 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 Percent Compaction Remarks 94.8 6 17.5 99.9 111.0 90.0 28 17.4 103.2 111.9 92.6 30• 14.7 118.1 120.2 98.2 3 14.7 116.7 120.2 96.9 32 14.9 107.3 1.17.4 91.6 4 18.6 91.7 107.4 90.0 6 16.7 100.9 112.1 90.0 8 11.8 103.1 113.7 90.7 10 11.5 105.5 116.0 91.0 2 14.8 112.1 117.4 95.6 2 13.7 110.5 117.4 94.1 6 16.5 109.3 117.4 93.2 6 13.2 109.0 117.4 92.8 1 • 15.5 105.1 113.7 92.6 12 12.7 104.8 1 113.7 92.2 14 13.9 103.9 113.7 91.4 2 17.2 96.3 106.4 90.5 8 19.8 98.9 109.3 90.3 3 12.0 112.9 117.4 96.1 16 11.7 105.9 111.9 94.7 5 13.1 108.7 116.8 93.1 10 10.4 101.9 111.0 91.7 7 12.4 109.0 116.8 . 93.3 18 13.0 104.8 113.7 92.3 10 14.4 106.9 116.8 91.4 12 11.4 103.0 109.3 94.3 2 9.6 110.8 117.4 . 94.4 4 10.6 104.3 113.7 91.8 6 17.7 112.8 119.0 94.7 12 15.1 99.2 . 109.3 90.8 8 166 109.2 116.8 93.6 6 13.2 106.3 116.8 91.1 10 16.6 110.6 . 120.6 91.6 32 15.1 113.1 120.6 93.8 16 12.0 106.8 116.0 92.0 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Prolect No. 7010281) T18 October 12; 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 Approx- imate Test Location No Lot No. TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Depth Maximum of Fill Field Dry Dry at Test Moisture Density Density in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Ft Percent Compaction Remarks 611 469 10 12.0 99.9 109.3 91.4 612 469***e 12 12.7 105.1 116.0 90.7 613 72 7 15.6 98.4 108.2 90.8 614 40 3 11.8 113.1 119.7 94.4 615 469** 14 11.2 112.8 117.4 95.9 616 467**** 4 13.8 104.1 115.5 90.0 617 108 12 11.0 103.1 113.7 90.6 618 150 2 15.8 102.7 1137 90.2 619 108 14 12.1 111.9 117.4 95.2 620 108 16 9.8 103.8 113.7 91.2 621 70 34 18.2 104.1 115.6 90.0 622 149 16 17.3 100.2 111.0 90.3 623 151 12 16.8 97.1 106.7 91.0 624 72 ill 17.9 106.2 115.6 91.8 625 152 2 12.0 101.9 111.0 91.7 626 151 16 17.1 91.6 106.4 86.1 627 151 . 16 14.5 . 92.7 106.4 87.1 628 152 6 14.2 94.8 106.4 89.1 629 71 36 13.0 103.9 113.7 91.4 630 64 8 6.7 111.8 116.0 96.4 631 61 4 22.8 100.2 110.6 90.6 632 71 40 16.6 104.1 110.6 94.2 633 70 38.5 * 12.9 107.1 113.7 94.2 634 69 14 17.3 100.4 110.0 91.4. 635 68 10 * 16.7 103.5 110.0 94.1 636 69 18 * 18.0 107.2 117.4 91.4 637 52 6 18.3 106.9 115.6 92.5 638 72 15 15.8 111.9 119.0 94.0 639 72 17 * 16.2 111.2 119.0 93.4 640 58 . 30 14.7 101.0 111.9 . 90.4 641 55 6 13.0 102.5 111.0 92.4 642 57 .34 17.0 104.0 113.7 91.4 643 58 34 * 15.4 107.0 113.7 94.0 644 .64 10 * 15.4 108.0 116.0 93.1 645 56 19 11;5 105.3 113.7 926 646 59 20 .15.7 99.7 109.3 91.2 647 30 15.0 * 13.3 100.9 111.0 90.9 * Finished Grade **Ô* Indicates test taken on Lot 469 of the adjacent La Costa Meadows Unit 03. Reworked Reworked Reworked BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. - Project No. 70-10-28D : 119 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft. Compaction Remarks 648 27 42.0* 14.5. 104.1 114.8 90.6 649 28 24.0* 10.7 108.6 118.2 91.7 650 29 .17.5* 10.5 104.8 114.8 91.3. 651 51 10 10.8 113.5 120.6 94.2 652 52 10.0* 11.9 111.1 . 119.4 93.1 653 51 14 13.4 102.2 113.7. 90.0 654 53 35* 14.0 107.1 115.3 92.8 655 55 8.5* 12.5, 112.2 117.0 95.9 656 51 150* 12.8 106.4 117.5 90.6 657 31 20.5* 16.2 99.9 111.0 90.0 658 32 36.5 1.2 . 96.9 107.8 90.0 659 33 . 36.5* 11.1 . 108.1 117.4 92.1 660 34 435* 10.2 101.2 111.0. 91.3 661 469**** 16 . 11.4 . 101.2 115.3 87.8 Reworked 662 46 17 14.4 105.1 113.7 92.4 663 468***2 9.9 110.1 115.3 95.6 Check on661 664 49 22.0 12.9 108.1 117.4 92.1 665 48 24 16.7 99.0 110.0 90.0 666 47 16 14.3 100.1 111.0 90.2 667 50 19 16.7 106.8 . 117.4 90.9 668 45 16 17.6 104.1 113.3 91.9 669 43 . 15 15.9 102.2 113.3 90.3 670 44 16. 15.9 103.9 113.3 91.6 671 47 20 14.0 . 112.4 117.4 95.6 672 46 .21 12.3 107.1 115.3 92.8 673 45 20 14.5 108.1 115.3 93.8 674 44 20 10.9 116.1 119.0 97.7. 675 43 . 19 18.7 . 94.0 106.4 88.3 Reworked 676 151 20 14.5 . 103.1 113.7 90.7 677 152 10 10.0 . 109.5 117.0 93.6 678 UnicàrnioSt. 2 18.8 94.4 106.4 88.6 Reworked Opp. Lot 063 . .. Sta. 3+15 679 449**** 20 . 10.4 106.2 115.3 92.2 680 466 **** 2 12.2 . 108.8 117.6 . 92.6 681 469**** 20 9.5 . 108.1 115.3 93.7 682 468 **** 6 9.6 110.9 115.3 96.1 * Finished Grade * *** Indicates test token on Lot 469 of the adjacent La Costa Meadows Unit 03. BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10-28D 1-20 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLEOF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density No. Lot Na. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft 683 466 684 195 685 194 686 193 687 Lucemaga St. Opp. Lot 0192 688 Rear Lot p184 689 192 690 182 691 469 692 467 693 43 694 Unkorno St. Opp. Lot #63 St0. 3+15 695 193 696 154 697 Unicornio St. 2 9.0 109.8 117.1 2 14.6 103.2 114.8 4 11.7 119.1 129.7 20 14.8 105.1 114.8 38 13.5 101.9 111.9 38 10.3 110.0 115.3 34 9.7 103.6 113;7 38 14.8 109.6 114.0 24 12.2 108.1 115.3 8 14.7 98.1 108.3 19 12.5 107.1 113.7 2 14.9 97.3 106.4 24 9.7 98.8 113.7 87.0 2 13.1 99.5 109.3 91.0 2 14.9 101.4 109.3 92.8 Reworked Percent Compaction Remarks 93.8 90.0 91.8 91.6 91.0 95.4 91.2 96.1 93.8 90.5 94.2 Check on 675 91.4 Check on p678 Opp. Lot 168 698 192 38 9.4 109.8 120.2 91.4 699 183 44 13.7 109.4 114.0 96.1 700 186 46 14.6 110.1 114.0 96.7 701 . 188 16 15.8 108.3 114.0 95.2 702 182 42 13.0 110.0 114.0 96.5 703 LuciemogaSt. 42 13.5 110.0 114.0 96.5 Opp. Lot 0192 704 192 42 14.0 110.1 114.0 96.6 705 193 24 9.1 109.5 116.9 93.8 706 159 1 14.0 110.1 117.4 93.3 707 41 1 15.5 98.6 106.4 92.7 708 41 3 15.3 105.1 110.8 95.0 709 41 5 17.1 99.8 106.4 93.7 710 . 42 .1 13.4 105.8 117.5 90.1 711 15 12.5 * 11.3 112.0 121.4 92.2 712 14 22.5 * 13.8 109.9 116.9 94.0 * Finished Grade **** Indicates test taken on Lot 469 of the adjacent La Costa Meadows Unit I3• Check on 1695 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. -Prject No. 70-10-28D 121 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. I TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CO NT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No.. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu Ft Compaction 713 12 24.0* . 15.5 104.7 1153 90.7 714 11 20.5 14.4 110.9 116.9 94.8 715 10 . 20.5* 14.0 105.4 113.7. 929 716 9 . . 26.5* 13.5 107.3 113.7 94.7 717 5 20.5* 11.7 107.4 117.4 91.5 718 4 22.0*. 11.4 107.9 117.0 92.1 719 3 20.5* 12.0 110.1 !17.0 94.1 720 2 . 24.5* 11.7 110.6 117.0 94.5 721 42 . 5 16.2 103.1 113.2 91.0 722 42 7 11.7 106.0 117.0 90.6 723 185 26 15.4 121.8 131.8 92.5 724 185 28 16.0 119.9 131..8 91.1 725 145 14 12.8 109.1 116.7 93.6 726 145 16 13.1 108.1 117.0 92.4 727 Unicornio St. 2 15.9 97.4 106.4 91.5 Opp. Lot 1160 728 84 14 8.0 110.7 115.3 95.9 729 80 4 10.0 104.0 115.3 . 90.1 730 81 2 9.3 110.6 117.4 94.1 731 1148.115 1.5 . 13.7 111.4 118.8 93.7 732 1 23.0* 13.5 105.7 117.4 90.0 733 105 19.0 9.0 95.8 117.4 81.7 .734 104 24.5* 12.3 . 100.5 117.4 85.5 735 Bet. Lot ll4&115 5.5 16.8 107.2 118.8 90.2 736 . . 108 18.5 * 8.2 102.7 117.4 87.5 737 Bet. Lot 1148.115 9.5 17.8 110.0 118.8 92.6 738 81 6 10.7 103.3 113.7 91.1 739 Bet. Lot 114 &115 13.5 16.5 110.9 118.8 93.3 740 106 18.0* 14.3 107.1 117.0 91.5 741 .. 80 8 11.6 102.8 113.7. . 90,4 742 183 . 48 15.5 1.21.2 131.8 . 91.8 743 . 184 46. 15.6 120.3 131.8 91.5 744 187 48 16.6 119.6 131.8 90.6 745 LuciemagaSt. 46 16.7 120.0 131.8 91.1 Opp. Lot 0192 746 193 28 14.4 122.2 131.8 92.6 747 81 10 14.1 108.2 119.0 91.0 * Finished Grade . Remarks Reworke Reworke Reworke BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Pro1ect No. 70-10-28D 1-22 CctoLw 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 . TABLE OF TEST RESULTS(CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No.. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Ft Compaction Remarks 748 80 . 12 13.4 103.1 113.7 90.9. 749 82 4 10.5 111.9 121.4 92.1 750 81 14 12.2 113.2 121.4 93.2 751 80 16 12.2 111.9 121.4 92.0 752 82 8 15.6 106.9 . 117.5 91.0. 753 80 20 11.4 107.7 115.3 93.2 754 83 4. 12.8 106.9 115.3 92.6 755 85 14 13.9 99.1 109.0 90.9 756 80 24 25.4 90.3 106.4 84.7 Reworked 757 81 22 21.8 90.1 106.4 84.7 Reworked 758 82 12 18.0 95.1 121.4 78.3 Reworked 759 83 8 20.2 95.0 110.0 86.5 Reworked 760 195 6 12.5 114.1 .120.6 94.8 761 143 25.0' 15.5 112.5 119.0 94.5 762 142 21.0* 13.5 114.0 119.0 95.8 763 141 19.0 * 11.9 . 113.0 119.0 95.0 764 81 18 13.4 114.5 121.4 94.3 765 140 10.5* 14.1 100.1 117.4 85.3 Reworked 766 139 6.0* 14.8 103.6 117.4 88.2 Reworked 767 136 12.5* 15.8 111.0 119.0 . 93.3 768 135 21.0*. 13.9 106.9 119.0 89.8 . Reworked 769 134 26.5 14.7 103.9 119.0 87.3 . Reworked 770 133 24.5* 10.1 . 110.9 115.3 96.1 771 194 8 15.1 111.5 .120.6 92.6 772 193 32 11.2 110.9 . 120.6 92.0 773 182 46 11.9 11L1 120.6 92.1 774 183 52 13.0 112.9 120.6 93.6 775 84 18 12.1 103.0 108.8 94.7 - 776 80 24 15.3 . 95.9 106.4. 90.0 Check on175 777. . 81 22 16.6 98.0 108.6 90.4 Check on 175 778 82 12 13.7 104.1 . 108.6 95.9. Check on175 779 83 . 8 13.8 . .100.3 108.6. . 92.5 Check on175 780 80 28 13.0 102.0 111.3 91.6 781 81 . 26 .13.3 .103.9 113.7 91.4 782 82 1.6 13;2 103.0 113.7 90.7 * Finished Grade BEP4TON ENGINEERING. INC. Prâect No. 70-10-280 T-23 October 12, 1971. La Costa Meadows No. 1 • Approx- imate Test Location No, Lot No. 783 83 784 84 785 82 786 83 787 85 788 195 789 196 790 198 791 Grullo St. Opp. Lot 1145 792 153 793 152 794 Grulla St. Opp. Lot1147 795 150 796 GruFlo St. Opp. Lot 0147 797 153 798 152 799 Unicornio St. Opp. Lot 068 800 152 801 203 802 43 803 44 804 151 805 Pipe, between Lots 0114&115 806 Unicornio St. • Opp. Lot 068 807 St. :Unicornio Opp. Lot. 078 808 118 809 118 810 Pipe, between Lots #114& 115 * Finished Grade TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Depth . .. Maximum of Fill Field Dry Dry. at Test Moisture Density Density Percent in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 12 16.9 104.6 113.7 92.1 22 15.2 101.9 108.6 93.9 20 15.3 102.8 113.7 . 90.5 16. 12.1 105.8 113.7 93.2 18 14.2 100.7 111.0. 90.7 10 14.7 114.0 120.6 94.6 2 15.9 . 109.0 120.6 90.6 2 16.2 99.4 109.3 . 90.9 10 10.8 103.9 115.3 90.0 4 16.7 107.3 117.4 91.5 14. 10.2 114.7. 117.4 97.6 12 15.4 109.2 115.6 94.6 6 12.4 109.9 117.4 93.5 . 14 13.8 109.8 . 115.1 95.4 8 14.5 . 114.2 121.4 94.0 18 . 13.6 117.4 121.4 96.8 4 16.7 108.2 117.4 92.2 22 13.4 1085 117.4 .92.3 2 17.2 100.9 109.3 92.1 23.0* 18.1 104.0 112.3 92.5 25.5* 17.5 100.9 111.0 91.0 24 13.2 105.0 114.5 91.7 1 16.9 110:9 117.4 • 94.4 .4 15.0 104.8 115.3 90.7 4 13.0 111.9 119.0 94.0 1 . 11.4. .101.7 .111.0 91.6 5 8.5. 1105 - 117.4 94.2 21.5 134 107.7. 1174 90.7 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 701028D 1-24 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 Test No. TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imote of Fill Field Dry Dry Location at Test Moisture Density Density Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Ft Percent Compaction Remarks 119 1 119 3 205. 2 195 14.. 207 2 205 6 197 4 204 4 206 4. 196 6 Bet. Lots 114 & 115 25.5 Bet. Lots 114 & 115 .29.5 144 22.5 * 132 27.0 207 6 222 2 131 11.0* 130 10.5* 129 16.0 * 128 28.0 127 54.0 * .126 50.5* 125 51.5* 198 6 203 6 Alga Rd. 12 Sta. 55+50 222 . 2 204 8 Luciernaga P1. 4 Opp. Lot 0203 208 4 Alisma St. 4. Opp. Lot p222 194 12 10.5 108.1 115.3 93.7 11.3 113.5 119.0 95.4 12.0 110.9 . 113.5 97.6 13.5 108.2 111.6 97.0 14.7 107.1 113.0 94.7 10.6 107.8 114.3 94.3 12.4 108.1 114.3 94.6 12.1 . 101.0 109.3 92.4 11.2 108.7 116.1 93.5 13.5 99.6 109.3 91.1 16.0 109.9 117.4 93.6 15.1 . 114.0 117.4 97.1 12.8 112.2 117.4 95.6 12.3 114.1 117.4 97.2 16.9 104.9 115.3 90.9 19.7 94.5 109.3 86.3 18.4 110.0 119.0 92.2 20.0 106.5 117.4 90.6 15.1 109.9 119.0 92.3 19.0 104.8 112.4 93.2 12.7 111.5 117.4 94.8 19.4 102.7 112.0 91.6 15.0 110.8 117.4 94.4 11.6 116.1 121.4 95.6 14.6 110.3 115.4 95.6 16.7 108.5 119.0 91.2 17.4 100.6 111.8 90.0 18.3 106:4 117.4 90.6 17.8 105.2 111.9 94.0 20.0 99.9 . 111.0 90.0 13.9 97.4 106.7 91.2 1.7.6 106.9 117.4 91.0 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 8.35 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 Trench Backfill Trench Backfl 1.1 Reworked Check on p826 * Finished Grade BENTON ENGINEERING INC. Project No. 701028D 1-25 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CO NT.) . . . Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test. Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Ft Compaction Remarks 843 193 36 18.1 105.7 111.9 . 94.4 844 192 46 14.5 92.1 111.3 . . 82.6 Reworked 845 Luci St. 50 16.2 90.2 106.7 84.6 Reworked Opp. Lot p192 846 Alga Rd. 14 . 17.4 107.4 112.8 95.1 Sta. 55+25 847 Alga Rd. 2 16;4 108.7 115.5 94.0 Sta; 58+25 848 Alga Rd.- 16 18.2 107.1 112.8 .94.9 Sta. 55+50 . .. 849 Alga Rd. . 4 17.8 107.1 114.6 . 93.4 Sta. 58+00 850 180 4 13.3 116.5 126.5 92.0 851 57 3 16.0 112.6 117.4 95.9 852 124 48.0 16.2 111.8 117.4 95.2 853 123 36.0* 15.2 104.2 115.3 90.2 854 122 11.0* 18.2 105.7 113.4 93.2 855 57 5 15.0 109.9 117.4 93.5 856 145 18.5* 17.0 110.4 118.2 933 857 160 2.0* 20.0 102.7 113.4 90.6 858 159 1.0* 18.4 102.4 113.4 90.3 859 Pipe, Lot #57 7 164 106.3 117.4 90.5 860 15 2.0 19.1 96.6 117.4 82.3 Reworke 861 157 1.0* 16.1 109.5 117.4 93.2 862 156 1.0* 12.1 112.3 117.4 95;6 863 155 1.0* 18.4 105.5 1161 90.8 864 181 20 14.0 105.2 115.3 91.2 865 182 52 12.5 103.2 113.7 90.8. 866 184 50 11.5 108.7 115.3 . 94.2 867 181 24 . 14.0 110.8 119.0 93.0 868 180 8 13.1 113.2 119.0 95.2 869 Pipe, Lot 058 . 11 16.5 103.0 113.7 90.7 & Lot 159 . • . 870 186 .50 15.4 102.8 113.7 90.5 871 Luci St. 50 . 15.9 105.4 113.7 92.6 Check on 084 Opp. Lot '192 . . .• . • Finished Grade • . BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Test No. 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 nN Project No. 70-10-28D 1-26 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No, 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Location of Test Moisture Density Density Percent Lot No. in Feet %dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 192 46 17.2 95.9 . 106.4 90.1 Check on 0844 Pipe, Lot 058 15 17.4 104.3 113.7 91.6 & Lot #59 184 186 187 188 188 187 188 - 189 188 187 - 188 189 & Lot # 159 Pipe, Lot 0158 188 187 189 188 189 184 187 188 189 186. 187 Pipe, Lot 0158 & Lot #159 . 177 179 180 Pipe, Lot 0158 &Lot 0 15 183 54 17.8 105.9 .115.7 91.5 54 15.4 102.9 113.7 90.5 52: 14.2 . 97.4 106.7 91.2 20 17.0 101.0 110.2 91.6 24 " 15.6 103.1 . 110.2 93.5 56 15.6 104.9 113.7 92.2 28 15.4 100.2 . 111.0 90.4 4 14.9 103.2 113.7 90.7 32 14.0 103.1 113.7 90.6 60 16.2 108.8 113.7 95.7 36 17.2 96.5 106.7 90.4 8 14.9 99.2 109.3 90.6 19 14.4 103.5 114.5 . 90.4 40 15.9 105.8 114.1 92.8 64 19.7 98.1 108.3 90.6 12 14.0 1069 115.3 92.6 44 13.3 106.1 115.3 92.0 16 10.3 109.1 117.4 93.0 58 18.8 95.9 106.4 90.1 68 . 19.9 98.9 . 109.3 90.3 48 20.0 103.3 111.3 92.8 20 18.7 97.5 106.7. 91.5 58 17.9 104.0. 115.3 , 90.2 72 . 18.2 105.9 112.8 93.8 24 16.2 108.8 117.4 92.7 2 . 19.5 95.0 112.8 84.4 Reworked 4 17.5 106.0 1.12.8' 94.0 12 15.7 114.3 115.4 99.2 28 14.4 107.0 115.3 92.7 56 .• 17.1 99.5 106.4 93.5 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10-28D 1-27 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS CONT.) Approx- Imote Test Location No. Lot No. 904 Luci St. Opp. Lot 0192 905 177 906 179 907 Pipe, Lot 0158 & lot 0159 908 468 909 175 910 182 911 181 912 181 913 180 914 178 915 179 916 178 917 180 918 179. 919 178 920 186 921 187 922 188 923 186 924 189 .925 188 926 184 927 Pipe, Lot 1158 & Lot 0159. 928 194 929 189 930 188 931 187 932 186 933 184 934 183 935. 120 936 189 937 212 Depth Maximum of Fill Field Dry Dry at Test Moisture Density Deniity Percent in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 54 . 14,1 104.2 1.15.3 90.4 12 14.0 100.8 106.7 94.5 Check on1899 8 17.6 102.2 113.7 90.0 32 18.0 104.9 115.3 90.9 24 . 8.8 101.9 111.0 91.8 2 17.6 103.1 109.3 94.4 56 17.0 96.0 106.7 90.0 28 16.1 95.8 106.4 90.0 32 16.8 103.2 112.0 92.2 16 11.5 117.0 127.6 91.6 2 12.3 106.2 115.3 92.3 12 13.2 107.0 115.3 92.7 6 12.2 . 106.5 117.4 90.6 20 12.5 108.9 117.4 92.8 16 14.0 107.5 119.0 90.4 10 13.3 105.4 115.3 91.4 62 13.7 105.1 115.3 91.2 76 15.1 107.1 117.4 91.3 52 13.7 105.2 1153 91.2 66 13.9 101.3 111.0 91.4 24 19.3 . 103.2 114.8 90.0 56 13.5 . 106.1 117.4 90.5 62 15.8 103.2 113.7 90.8 36 13.2 106.1 115.3 92.1 16 13.8 99.4 106.7 93.3. 28 16.6 99.2 106.7 93.1 60 14.5 99.8 .110.6 90.3 80 15.7 99.9 111.0 90.0 70 16.9. 104.1 115.3 90.3 66 16.5 105.0 115.3 91.0 60 17.3 985 109.3 . 90.0 2 13.3 101.9 111.0 91.7 32 15.6 . 111.1 119.0 93.4 2 17.7 107.7 115.3 93.3 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. 14.0 .. 100.5 111.5 17.9 105.2 115.3 14.0 . 104.9 . 115.3 16.8 103.1 113.7 14.9 100.8 111.5 12.1 101.1 111.5 14.4 103.5 113.7 14.2 . 104.9 115.3 13.8 104.9 1.15.3 14.6 102.2 113.7 14.2 102.9 113.7 13.1 110.3 . 121.4 11.6 111.1 115.3 Project No. 70-10-28D 1-28 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 Test No. 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 969 970 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth maximum ;mate of Fill Field Dry Dry location at Test Moisture Density Density Lot No. in Feet %dry wt . lb/cu Ft . lb/cu ft 214 1 18.6 96.5 106.7 217 . 4 . 9.7 95.8 106.4 216. 2 14.9 98.4 106.7 215 2 20.0 98.4 106.7 90 1 19.2 105.6 115.3 91 4 12.6 104.1 115.3 216 6 13.5 116.0 120.6 213 4 15.7 198.4 115.3 218 2 14.1 113.3 .118.9 217 8 14.3 102.2 1.13.7 182 60 16.7 110.1 .115.6 181 36 12.7 99.2 113.7 183 64 18.5 107.7 115.6 184 70 11.3 113.3 120.6 186 74 15.5 114.2 122.1 187 . 84 14.4 103.1 113.7 192 50 12.9 104.0 113.9 tuei St. 58 16.7 101.9 111.0 Opp. Lotl 192 193 40 180. 24 189 36 188 64 187 88 186 78 184 74 183 68 182 64. Sewer Backfill 3.a Lot Line 181-182 181 36 174 2 Sewer Pipe bet. 2 Alga Rd. & bench 173 1 172 2 3* over storm drain pip. Percent Compaction Remarks 90.4 90.0 92.2 92.3 91.4 90.3 96.1 94.0 95.3 90.0 95.2 87.2- Reworked 93.2 93.9 93.6 90.6 91.3 91.7 90.0 91.2 90.9 90.6 90.4 90.8 91.1 91.0 91.. 90.0 90.4 •• Check on 09, 91.0 96.4 13.8 114.3 .123.5 . 92.7 13.3 110.0 117.4 • 93.6 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 701028D 1-29 12, 1971 La Costa Meaddws No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imafe of-Fill Field Dry Dry: Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. In Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/au Ft Compaction Remarks 971 188 68 11.2 . 105.2 116.8 . Qfl.0 972 177 . 6 14.0 108.2 117.4 92.1 973 176 4 13.2 105.5 115.3 91.4. 974 Sewer Pipe backfill 6 19.9 99.5 109.3 91.0 Alga Rd1 to bench . Lot 1111! 975 179 20 . 17.1 103.3 113.7 90.8 976 178 16 18.3 102.9 113.7 90.4 977 177 10 20.0 102.2 113.3 90.3 978 176 8 16.5 101.5 109.3 92.8 979 175 6 22.6. . 98.5 106.7 92.2 980 Sewer Pipe backfill 10 18.9 103.9 115.3 90.1 between Alga Rd. to bench 981 182 68 18.8 96.6 106.7 90.6 982 187 92 16.3 111.2 117.4 94.8 983 189 40 12.5 107.9 117.4 91.8 984 467 10 11.2 104.8 115.3 907 985 172 6* 1.4.5 105.9 115.3 91.7 986 174 .6 2.8 93.3 103.1 90.5 987 176 12 13.1 104.9 115.3 90.9 988 178 18 18.7 92.8 115.3 80.4 Reworked .989 181 40 14.6 106.1 115.3 92.0 990 175 10 14.7 105.6 113.6 93.0 991 Sewer backfill 14 18.1 106.6 117.0 91.1 Alga Rd..to bench 992 Sewer backfill 4** 13.9 113.9 124.1 91.6. LucemagaCt. . Opp. Lot p192 993 174 10 . 11.3 96.9 111.0 87.2 . Reworked 994 174 . 10 18.9 100.0 .111.0 90.0 Check on199 995 180 28 14.6 105.9 111.9 . 94.7 996 179 24 18.0 101.5 111.9 90.7 997 177 . 14 12.2 108.0 117.0. 92.2 998 175 14 .18.7 . 106.1 1113 92.0 999 176 16 16.5 110.0 117.4 93.6 1000 174 14 15.8 108.3 115.3 93.8 ** 4 over storm drain pipe * Finished Grade . . . . .. . BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. & bench 1002 175 18 1003 177 18 1004 176 20 1005 177 .22 1006 178 22 1007 179 28 1008 181 44 1009 Sewer Pipe backfill 22 Alga Rd. to bench 1010 178. 26 1011 176 24 1012 183 72 1013 180 32 1014 182 72 1015 193 44 1016 . 195 18 1017 197 8 1018 Sewerbockfill 4 Lot Line 195 & 196 1019 192 54 1020 184 78 1021 186 82 1022 AlismoSt. 8 Opp. Lot 0222 1023 240 2 1024 240 4. 1026 243 .2 1026 Intersection 1 Abelorra St. & Antilopa St. 1027 238 . 2 1028 244 2 1029 224 2.5* 16.3 106.5 . 115.3 92.4 13.6 107.8 115.3 93.4 13.4 106.0 . 115.3 91.8 12.4 109.9 117.4 93.5 15.7 106.3 115.3 92.2 17.3 107.2 117.4 91.4 13.8 108.0 115.3 93.6 13.5 101.2 111.0 91.3 19.1 104.5 115.3 90.6 15.4 106.1 115.3 92.0 15.2 106.5 115.3 92.4. 10.0 107.9 115.3 93.6 14.4 102.1 111.0 92.0 15.2 104.3 115.3 90.4 15.8 103.5 113.3 91.2 15.1 109.8 117.4 93.6 16.6 97.2 106.7 91.1 17.1 104.2 115.3 90.2 14.8 113.9 121.4 93.6 16.4 107.8 117.4 91.8 14.8 110.7 117.4 94.1 19.5 101.1 . 111.0 91.0. 18.6 105.9 117.4 90.1 19.1 . 106.0 117.4 90.3 21.3 87.8 102.9 85.2 Reworked 16.6 . 103.5 113.7 91.1 15.1 104.0 115.3 90.1 17.5 109.2 119.0 91.7 Check on #98E Pfojer No. 70-10-28D 1-30 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imote of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. In Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 1001 Sewerbackfill 18 15.7 108.2 119.0 90.8 between Alcrn RdL *% 4' over stern drain pipe * Finished Grade BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10-28D 1-31 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum mate oF Ff11 Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu Ft Compaction Remarks 1030 196 10 20.6 97.8 108.0 90.6 1031 183 75 11.0 102.9 113.7 .90.6 1032 177 26 15.4 108.1 117.4 92.1 1033 178 30 13.4 98.4 106.7 92.1 1034 179 32 15.6 100.1 111.0 90.1 1035 180 36 13.0 101.1 111.0 91.0 1036 181 48 12.2 105.1 115.3 91.0 1037 207 10 18.5 101.7 112.2 90.5 1038 206 8 18.7 102.9 112.2 91.6 1039 179 36 14.2 105.2 115.3 91.1 1040 Intersection 2 11.2 . 97.4 106.7 91.1 Check on 102c Abe jorro St. & Anti lope St. 1041 175 22 13.9 111.8 119.0 93.9 1042 173 5 12.7 108.9 115.3 94.4 1043 174 16 13.7 106.1 1153 92.0 1044 177 30 14.9 107.0 115.3 92.8 1045 194 20 14.2 99.9 113.7 87.8 Reworked 1046 179 40 20.4 98.4 109.3 90.0 1047 221 4 13.1 109.1 119.0 91.7 1048 194 20 201 102.7 113.7 90.4 Check on110 1049 222 6 15.5 107.9 117.4 91.9 1050 181 52 13.4 110.2 116.1 94.8 1051 221 8 17.1 101.3 111.0 91.2 1052 178 34 22.6 100.9 111.9 90.2 1053 180 40 14.0 103.9 113.7 91.2 1054 218 . 4 18.4 104.1 115.3 90.3 1055 205 - 10 19.1 105.2 115.3 91.3 1056 216 10 14.1 100.1 113.7 88.1 Reworked 1057 216 10 15.2 100.2 111.0 90.2. Check on10. 1058 192 . 58 11.5 .110.0 119.0 92.4 1059 193 48 12.0 105.3 . 114.5 92.1 1060 194 24 13.8 108.0 117.4 92.0 1061 195 22 14.0 105.8 117.4 90.2 1062 . 206 12 15.8 110.1 117.4 93.8 1063 196 14 14.3 96.4 106.7 50.3 1064 198 10 16.1 . 98.5 106.7 92.4 1065 199 2 13.0 101.2 106.7 94.8 1066 210 4 15.9 102.0 109.3 93.3 1067 209 . 2 12.3 105.0 113.7 92.2 BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 01028D T-32 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Ft Compaction Remarks 1068 198 14 19.4 102.3 113.3 90.2 1069 203 . .10. 17.1 104.8 112.1 93.3 1070 197 12 15.2 97,6 106.7 . 91.5- 1071 204 12 18.7 87.5 106.7 82.1 Reworked 1072 208 8 21.0 96.3 106.4 90.6 1073 211 4 16.8 93.1 111.0 83.9 Reworked 1074 204 12 14.6 116.1 122.7 94.5 Checkon10 1075 211 4 .16.5 113.7 121.4 93.5 Check on10 1076 . 203 14 11.3 115.1 121.4 94.8 1077 202 2 16.8 103.9 113.7 91.3 1078 45 25.5 * 14.1 104.9 115.3 90.8 1079 46 24.5 * 16.1 110.1 .119.0 92.4 1080 47 22 * 18.0 98.5 108.7 90.6 1081 48 26.5 * 17.2 105.1 115.3 91.0. 1082 186 86 19.6 99.8 110.2 90.4 1083 187 96 13.4 114.0 121.8 93.6 1084 198 44 15.7 102.9 113.7 90.5. 1085 49 22 • 14.8 103.2 110.7 93.3 1086 50 20.5. * 15.9 100.1 110.7 90.4 1087 51 15.5 * 15.3 108.8 116.1 93.7 1088 52 10 * 11.5 114.8 121.4 94.6 1089 35 52.5 * 23.2 99.8 110.3 90.4 1090 36 42.5 a 14.2 107.8 117.4 91.7 1091 37 32.5 * 14.1 108.1 117.4. 92.1. 1092 . 38 18.5 " 14.7 113.9 119.0 95.6 1093 39 10.5 * 12.9 110.7 119.0. 93.0 1094 40 8 * 15.9 105.2 116.1 90.5 1095 41. 9 a 17.6 102.5 113.7 90.0 1096 42 9 * 16.0 111.1 119.0 93.2 1097 79 11.5 * 15.8 107.1 115.3 92.8 .1098 80 29.5 a 17.8 104.8 115.3 90.7 1099 81 30.5 a . 19.2 100.8 111.0 . 90.7 . 1100 82 22.5 * 20.2 94.2 109.3 86.1 Reworked 1101 83 18.5 a 12.3 110.1 117.4 93.8 1102 84 . 26.5 * 15.6 101.9 111.0 91.7 1103 188 ' . 72 11.3 110.9 121.9 . 91.0 1104 . 184 82 17.1 101.1 110.7 91.3. 1105 187 . 100 18.6 . 106.8 115.6 92.4 1.106 188 76 13.6 103.1 113.7 90.6 1107 56 21.5 a . 15.6 105.5 115.3 91.4 Finished Grade BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Test No. 11.12 1113 1)14 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1)21 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1108 1109 1110 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1)40 Apptox- Depth Moxium imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Location of Test Moisture Density Density Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft 57 59 61 146 147 148 149 150 151 112 113 114 115 116 203 233 231 232 232 231 232 Luciemaga St. Opp. Lot 188- 189 Luciemago St. Opp. Lot 188- 189 189 186 182 North Side 188 223 240 242 239 241 242 48 10.2 108.1 117.4 91.9 90 12.9 110.6 117.4 94.1- 80 11.3 107.7 115.3 93.2 80 13.0 104.0 114.5 90.6 2 19.3 98.5 109.3 90.1 6 15.1 105.5 115.7 91.1 2 14.0 115.0 121.4 94.7 4 17.3 99.5 109.3 90.9 2 17.8 102.2 112.7 90.7. 6 14.6 • 113.1 121.4 93.2 35.5 * 20.8 93.7 110.8 20.5 * 14.1 108.8 115.3 6.5 * 15.8 108.2 115.3 14.0 * 16.7 108.6 117.4 22 * 18.3 113.3 119.0 20 * 17.6 105.6 115.3 18.5 * 16.0 107.8 115.3 10 * 17.1 97.8 109.3 28 * 10.5 1086 115.3 6 * 11.1 108.3 119.0 10 * 11.7 110.8 119.0 32 * 18.9 95.3 113.7 32.5 * 14.2 111.2 119.0 27.0 * 14.6 98.8 113.7 16 17.6 103.8 115.3 2 * 20.8 100.8 109.3 1 11.5 104.9 113.7 1 11.5 100.5 113.7 1 13.6 104.3 113.7 5 11.1 105.2 113.7 5 * 12.9 101.5 111.0 4 15.5 106.3 115.3 8 13.0 102.0 111.0 Percent Compaction Remarks 84.5 Reworked 94.3 93.9 92.5 95.2 91.5 93.5 89.4 Reworked 94.1 91.0 93.1 83.9 Reworked 93.3 87.0 Reworked 90.0 92.2 92.2 88.4 Reworked 91.8 Check on1I'd 92.5 91.4 92.0 91.8 Project No. 70-10-28D 1-33 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) * Finished Grade BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project-No. 70-10-2) La Costa Meadows No. I 1-34 - October 12, 1971 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test location ,at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. lot No. In Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Fl Compaction Remarks 1141 246 2 14.4 113.0 .121.4 931 1142 222 10 14.9 98.6 .109.3 90.0 1143 240 10 21.7 99.3 109.3 90.7 1144 221 12 13.3 106.3 115.3 92.2 1145 222 14 11.1 103.6 106.7 97.1 1146 239 8 17.4. 102.3.. 113.7 90.0 1147 243 6 13.3 . 103.1 110.6 93.2 114.8 221 16 12.4 106.8 110.6 96.6 1149 222 18 15.9 98.8 109.3 90.2 1150 221 20 14.8 104.2 111.0 93.9 1151 222 22 . 12.2 112.3 121.4 92.4 1152 212 6 * 16.8 104.5 116.1 90.0 1153 213 6 * 11.3 114.0 121.4 93.8 1154 214 4 * 11.4 109.6 121.4 90.2 1155 215 2 10.0 112.7 121.4 92.8. 116 216 10 * 14.8 112.2 121.4 92.4 1157 217 12 * 15.6 107.3 119.0 90.1 1158 218 7 * 14.4 106.2 117.4 90.5 1159 221 24 14.9 102.3 117.4 87.2 1160 222 25 * 15.0 101.7 117.4 86.6 1161 179 2 17.3 106.5 113.7 93.8 1162 223 6 15.8 107.0 113.7 94.0 1163 Alisma St. 12 . . 17.9 105.5 113.7 92.7 Opp. 222 1164 241 6 18.1 104.5 .113.7 91.8 1165 . 223 10 14.3 104.5 .113.7. 91.8 1166 244 6 19.9 97.5 106.7 91.4 1167 Alisma St. 16 12.6 111.0 117.4 94.6 Opp. 222 . . 1168 223 14 17.6. 98.7 109.3 . 90.2 1169 240 14 17.2 98.1 106.7 91.9 1170 223 . 16 13.0 112.4 1175 . 95.5 1171 242 10. 15.4 108.9 117.4 92.8 1172 223 18 17.4 96.1 117.4 81.6 1173 241 . 10 9.9 111.0 117.4 94.5 1174 238 6 11.7 102.5 113.7 90.0 1175 Intersection . 5 . 14.4 109.0 117.4 92.8 AbejorroSt. & . . Anti lope St. 1176 183 75 15.7. . 112.3 121.4 . 92.5 * Finished Grade .. BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Reworked Reworked Reworked Project No. 70-10-28D 1-35 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. I TABLE OF TEST RESULTS Approx- Depth Maximum imate •. of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet 0/c dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu Ft Compaction Remarks 1177 184 North 82 15.5 108.3 117.4 92.1 Side 1178 187 104 12.9 110.2 117.4 93.8 1179 189 52 13.1 103.8 115.3 90.0 1180 184 North 84 12.3 105.9 117.4 90.2 Side 1181 201 2 13.2 118.5 129.7 91.2 1182 199 6 13.6 105.5 118.9 97.2 1183 198 18 12.4 104.1 115.3 90.1 1184 200 2 12.4 105.8 115.3 91.6 1185 197 16 12.2 105.7 117.4 90.0 1186 199 10 13.8 101.1 115.3 87.5 Reworked 1187 199 10 15.1 111.5 116.1 96.0 Check on p1186 1188 197 20 15.6 108.5 116.1 93.5 1189 200 6 12.8 105.5 116.1 90.8 1190 196 18 14.8 107.5 116.1 92.5 1191 198 22 13.6 . 106.1 1.16.1 91.4 1192 201 6 11.3 102.4 113.7 90.0 1193 197 24 13.6 . 108.7 115.3 94.2 1194 179 43 12.1 99.6 116.1 85.8 Reworked 1195 178 38 * 11.5 107.3 118.7 90.1 1196 199. 14 13.7 108.2 116.1 93.2 1197 198 26 13.1 111.6 119.7 93.2 1198 Luciernoga P1. 8 * 15.7 99.8 109.3 91.3 Opp. 203 1199 240 18 11.8 109.2 117.4 92.9 1200 238 8 13.7 105.6 116.1' 91.0 1201 238 . 10 10.4 104.7 116.1 90.1- 1202 241 14 16.2 94.3 109.3 86.2 Reworked 1203 . 241 14 14.5 101.6 109.3 92.8 Check on 1202 1204 245- 4 10.5 . 109.7 • 117.1 93.6 1205 241 • 16 13.9 108.0 114.0 94.5 1206 • 246 6 10.8 105.0 116.1 90..3 1207 241 . 18 17.4 .96.8 110.6 87.5 Reworked 1208 247 2 • 17:0 . 99.3 109.3 90.8 1209 241 20 • 19.6 94.1 106.7 88.2 Reworked 1210 241 . • 22 16.8 102.3 116.1 88;1 Reworked 1211 243 10 15.1 96.8 106.7 90.7 * Finished Grade • . .. • BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10-28D La Costa Meadows No. I October 12, 1971 App rox- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location of Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt. lb/cu Ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 1212 244 10 18.2 94.2 106.7 88.3 Reworked 1213 154 3 * 12.7 103.2 113.7 90.7 1214 153 12 * 9.9 119.0 126.5 94.1 1215 152 24* 7.5 109.2 115.3 94.7 1216 85 21 .* 11.9 106.8 117.4 90.9 1217 86 15 * 12.7 112.0 117.4 95.2 1218 87 4 * 10.5 108.8 . 116.1 93.6 1219 88 3 * 12.1 109.9 117.4 93.6 1220 89 2 * 17.7 104.8 109.3 95.7 1221 186 94* 11.1 108.3 115.3 93.8 1222 189 53 * 13.2 115.3 126.5 91.0 1223 188 82 12.3 105.4 116.1 90.6 1224 187 105* 11.8 109.8 121.4 90.4 1225 Between Lots 4 13.7 106.3 117.4 90.6 182&183 Trench Backfill 1226 90 2 * . 14.8 101.2. 111.0 91.0 1227 91 5 * 12.8 108.4. 116.1 93.1 1228 Between Lots 8 12.0 109.1 116.1 93.8 132 & 183 Trench Backfill 1229 184 86 * 9.8 112.2 116.1 96.4 1230 183 76 * 10.1 110.9 . 115.3 96.0 1231 Between Lots 12. 12.9 109.4 116.1 94.2 182 & 183 Trench 1232 Between Lots 16 11.8 118.1 121.4 97.1 182&183 . . Trench 1233 Between Lots 20 10.5 106.1 116.1 91.2 182& 183 . Trench 1234 182 76 * 9.5 .108 1 116.1 93.0 1235 18f 54 * .9.2 107.2 116.1 92.3 1236 180 45 * 10.4 106.1 116.1 91.2 1237 179 43* 13.1 109.9 117.4 93.6 Check on115 1238 Between Lots 4 16.5 1060 117.4 90.2 59&60Trench 1239 108 18.5 * 13.2 . 106.2 117.4 90.3 1240 107 33 * 14.3 109.1 117.4 92.8 * Finished Grade BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. 'U--LOD Lo Costa Meadows No. 1 . TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Feld Dry Dry : Test Location ofTest Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet %dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 1241 123 36 14.6 107.2 115.3 92.8 1242 158 2 * 15.7 101.1 111.0. 90.8. Check on 860 1243 .176 29* 11.0 105.8 115.3 91.7 1244 175 . 30* 13.0 106.2 115.3 92.1 1.245 Trench,Water. 8 16.5 103.2 113.7 90.6 Line Between Lots 59 & 60 Alga Rd. 1246 173 7* 11.1 104.1 115.3 90.2 1247 202 7* . 9.3 107.1 117.4 91.1 1248 201 10* 11;2 114.2 117.4 97.2 1249 200 9 * 11.8 112.9 117.4 96.1 1250 199 15* 10.7 107.6 117.4 91.6 1251 177 32* 8.5 105.1 116.1 90.5 1252 . 174 18* 12.3 107.1 117.4 91.1 1253 lranchbackfill 12 18.4 100.7 111.0 90.6 between Lots 59 & 60 1254 198 28 15.9 107.8 115.3 93.4 1255 197 28* 14.9 113.0 121.4 93.0 1256 196 21 * 14.8 113.9 121.4 . 93.9 1257 192 62* 17.1 111.2 121.4 91.6 1258 193 51 * 16.1 106.6 115.3 92.3 1259 194 . 26*. 14.7 112.0 121.4 92.3 1260 195 26* 13.8 117.2 121.4 96.5 1261 206 15* 14.9 115.9 121.4 95.5 1262 204 15* 14.5 115.1 121.4 94.8 1263 203 18* 19.8 102.7 113.7 90.2 1264 207 14* 10.7 109.6 116.1 . 94.4 1265 208 11* 14.2 112.2 121.4 92.4 1266 209. 7 * 16.7 108.2 117.4 92.2 1267 210 7 * 16.3 111.9 121.4 92.1 - 1268 211 5 * 16.3 104.3 11.3.7 91.6 1269 220 3•5* 15.6 112.3 121.4 92.4 1270 241 22.5* . 16.2 107.3 117;4 91.3 1271 240 19.5* 15.6 103.6 114.5 90.4 1272 239 11 16.5 113.5 121.4 93.4 1273 242 12* 18.8 106.4 117.4 90.6 1274 243 . 12* 17.9 102.9 113.7 90.4 1275 Trench backfill 16 18.0 101.3 111.0 91.2 Over Water Line . Between Lots 59&60 . * Finished Grade . BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project r. 70-10-280 1-38 October 12, 1971 to Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth W,oximum imote of Ff11 Field Dry Dry Test Location of Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 1276 245 8 * 17.8 105.6 116.1 90.8 1277 238 12* 13.8 106.2 117.4 90.4 1278 247 5 * 15.9 102.5 113.7 900 1279 233 2 * 16.5 105.7 116.1 91.0 1280 Trench backfIll 20 18.8 96.6. 106.4 90.8 Over Water Line Between Lots 1281 Trench bockflll 24 15.7 105.9 114.2 92.7 Over Water Line Between Lots 59 & 60 1282 59 26* 12.8 105.7 114.2 92.6 1283 60 28* 12.6 106.0 114.2 92.8 1284 232 5 * 18.4 106.4 117.4 90.4 1285 231 5.5 13.8 109.1 115.3 94.5 1286 105 . 19* 11.4 115.1 117.8 . 97.6 Check on 733 1287 104 . 24.5* 11.4 108.0 116.1 92.9 Check on 734 1288 139 6 * 18.9 103.0 111.0 92.7 Check on 766 1289 140 .10* 13.1 107.6 115.3 93.3 Check on765 1290 134 •26.5 * 11.6 110.3 . 117.4 94.0 Check on 769 1291 135 21.5 * 12.1 111.5 117.4 95.0 Check on 768 1292 150 10* 11.4 108.9 117.4 92.8 Check on 1115 1293 244 10 .20.7 96..2 106.7 . 90.3 Check on 1212 1294 Alga Road W. 2 * 13.5 112.9 117.4 96.1 Side Sta. 66+00 . 1295 Alga Road W. 2 14.3 110.3 117.4. 94.0 Side Sta. 64+00 1296 Alga Rood W-. 2 * 13.0 106.7 113.1 94.2 Side Sta. 62+00 . . 1297 Alga Rood W. 2 * 15.2 113.4 117.4 96.4 Side Sta. 60+00 .1298 Alga Road W. 6 * 13.9 104.6 113.1 92.4 Side Sta. 58+00 1299 Alga Rood W. 18 12.7 109.4 115.3 94.8 Side Sta. 56+00 1300 Alga Rood W. . 12* 13.7 112.8 . 117.4 96.1 Side Sta- 54+00 . .. 1301 Alga Rood W. 2 * 14.7 105.9 . 116.1 91.1 Side Sta. 52+00 . . * Finished Grade BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Percent Compaction. Remarks 93.6 95.6 97.7 94.2 92.3 94.0 90.2 Check on 1108 92.4 Check on 1119 90.5 Check on 1121 908 Check on 1,100 92.1 Check on 1212 & 1293 Pro ject No. /j-iu-I.L 1-39 October 12, 1971 1a Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum imote of Fill Field Dry Dry Location of Test ?Misture Density Density Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Ft Alga Road W. 2 * 14.7 110.1 117.4 Side Sta. 50+00 Alga Rood W. 2 * 13.4 112.3 117.4 Side Sta. 48+00 Alga Road W. 2* 13.9 114.8 117.4 Side Sta. 46+00 Alga Rood W. 2 * 15.9 109.4 116.1 Side Sta. 44+00 Alga Rood W. 2 * 12.9 107.2 116.1 Side Sta. 42+00 Alga Road W.• 2 * 11.4 109.1 116.1 Side Sta. 40-100 57 35.5* 15.5 96.4 106.7 114 32 10.9 110.1 flç 116 27* 9.5 105.2 116.1 82 22.5* 20.5 96.9 106.7 244 10 18.4 98.3 106.7 Test No. 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 13!8 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 Rri 75 3* 76 2 76 4* 77 2 77 4* 78 2 78 4* 244 12* Pressure San?- 2 Above tary Sewer Line Pipe Bet. Lois 34&35 Pressure Sani- 2 Above tory Sewer Line Pipe Bat. Lots 34 & 35 Pressure Sani- 4 Above tory Sewer Line Pipe Bet. Lots 34 & 35 Pressure San!- 4 Above tory Sewer line Pipe. Bet. Lots 34&35 Pressure Sani- 6 Above tory Sewer Line Pipe Bet. Lots 34& 35 13.9 104.1 113.0 92.0 10.5 101.8 111.0 91.6 11.3 107.7 117.4 91.7 - 13.9 109.8 117.4 93.5 13.0 103.9 115.3 90.0 15.3 104.1 115.3 90.3 12.2 114.3 119.0 96.0 12.2 115.1 119.0 96.6 11.8 .108.1 116.1 93.6 18.3 107.6 117.4 91.7 South Side 18.5 107.8 115.3 93.2 - North Side 15.6 101.0 112.0 901 South Side 14.7 102.6 112.0 91.6 North Side 15.8 113.2 117.4 96.3 South Side BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10-28D La Costa Meadows No. 1 1-4 October 12, 1971 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS Approx- Depth Maximum imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density No. Lot No. Th Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu Ft 1327 Pressure Sani- 6 Above 18.6 107.7 117.4 tar>' Sewer Line Pipe • Bet. Lots 34&35 1328 Pressure Sani- 8 Above 17.2 103.7 115.3 tory Sewer Line Pipe Bet. Lots 34&35 1329 Pressure Soni- 8 Above 16.5 109.1 119.0 tory Sewer Line Pipe Bet. Lots 34&35 1330 241 20 12.8 105.8 113.7 1331 223 2 11.0 108.8 117.4 1332 222 25 10.5 104.3 113.7 1333 221 24 17.1 105.9 117.4 1334 Pressure Sani- 2 Above 19.5 88.3 109.6 tory Sewer Line Pipe Using Concrete Vibrator Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1335 Pressure Sani- 2 Above 19.4 83.7 109.6 tory Sewer Line Pipe Using Concrete Vibrator Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1336 Pressure Sani- 2 Above 16.5 96.8 109.6 tory Sewer Line Pipe Using Concrete Vibrator Bet. • Lots 34&35 1337 Pressure Sani- 2 Above 15.2 97.3 109.6 tory Sewer Line Pipe Using Concrete Vibrator Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1338 Pressure Sani- 2Above 15.4 99.4 109.6 tory Sewer Line. Pipe Using Concrete - Vibrator Bet. Lots 34&35 I' BEP4TON ENGINEERING. INC. L Percent Compaction Remarks 91.7 North Side 90.0 South Side 91.6 North Side 93.2 Check on #1209 92.7 Check on1ll72 91.8 Check on 01160 90.2 Check on#1159 80.6 Reworked 76.4 Reworked 88.4 Reworked 88.8 • Reworked 90.8 Reworked Project No. 701028b 1-41 October 12, 1971 to Costa Meadows No. I TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) App rox- Depth Max Dnum imote of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test. Moisture Density Density Percent Lot No. in Feet %.dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction Remarks 1339 Pressure San- 2 Above' 14.4 112.0 1096 102.3 Check on tory Sewer Line Pipe p1334, *0 1335, Using Concrete . . p1336, 01337, Vibrator Bet. 01,338 Lots 34 & 35 . 1340 Pressure Sani- 4Above 15.0 102.9 109.6 94.0 tory Sewer Line Pipe . Using Concrete Vibrator Bet. Lots 348, 35 1341 Pressure Sani- 6Above 12.0 105.1 109.6 96.0 tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1342 241 22 20.2 107.0 109.6 97.7 Check on p121 1343 Pressure Sani- 8 Above 6.8 103.8 105.0 98.8 • tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope - Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1344 Pressure Sani- 10 Above 7.8 103.9 105:0 98.9 tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1345 Pressure Son i- 12 Above 6.9 107.2 ' 109.6 97.9 tory Sewer Pipe • Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34&35 • 1346 Pressure Sani- 14 Above 6.5 103.7 105.0 98.7 tory Sewer Pipe . Trench on Slope : Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1347 Pressure Sani- 16 Above . 12.3 100.9 105.0 96.0 • tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope . • Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1348 Pressure Sani- 18 Above 13.6 116.3 121.4 .95.9 tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34&35 . BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10-28D La Costa Meadows No. 1 1-42 October 12, 1971 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS CONT.) Approx-. Depth Maximum imote of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu Ft Compaction Remarks 1349 Pressure Sani- 20 Above 14.8 113.1 117.4 96.4 tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1350 Pressure Soni- 22 Above 14.2 114.0 121.4 93.8 tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34&35 1351 Pressure Sani- 10 Above 13.7 1C4.2 115.3 90.4 tory Sewer pipe Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1352 Pressure Sani- 10 Above 19.3 101.6 112.3 90.4 Rear of Lot tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1353 Pressure Sani- 12 Above 14.3 110.3 121.4 90.7 Front of Lot tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34&35 .1354 Pressure Sani- 12 Above 13.0 110.2 116.1 95.0 Rear of Lot tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34 & 35 1355 Pressure Sani- 14 Above 15.0 103.0 113.7 90.6 Front of Lot tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope Bat. Lots 34&35 1356 Pressure Sani- 14 Above 18.3 107.8 119.0 90.4 Rear of Lot tory Sewer Pipe Trench on Slope Bet. Lots 34&35 1357 North Side of 10 15.3 109.3 117.4 93.0 Sewer Pump Sta. Rear of Lots 34• - and 35 1358 South Side of 12 14.1 111.5 117.4 94.9 Sewer Pump Sta. . Rear of Lots 34 .and 35 •. . . BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. t'roject No. JU-10-2D t-43 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS (CONT.) Approx- Depth Maximum Imate of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density D.nsUy Percent No. Lot No. in Feet % dry wt lb/cu Ft lb/cu Ft Compaction Remarks 1359 NorPhSideoF 14* 13.2 111.5 117.4 94.9 Sewer Pump Sta. Rear of Lots 34 and 35 1360 241 18 22.6 98.4 109.3 90.0 Check on1J2 1361 79 2 12.0 111.1 121.4 91.3 1362 79 4 11.8 110.0 121.4 90.6 1363 79 6 19.3 102.6 109.3 93.8 1364 25 Rear 10 11.8 111.3 119.0 93.5 1365 24 Rear 6 10.1 111.1 119.0 93.4 1366 25 Rear 14 13.3 109.3 119.0 91.9 1367 24 Rear 8 11.4 103.3 113.7 91.0 1368 25 18 13.7 111.7 119.0 93.7 1369 24 10 13.1 110.6 119.0 92.9 1370 23 3 12.9 100.9 111.0 91.0 1371 151 16 15.3 98.8 109.3 90.2 Check on62 &627 1372 152 6 13.9 111.2 119.0. 93.5 Check on'621 1373 26 43 12.2 114.6 119.0 96.1 1374 25 20 11.6 109.8 119.0 92.2 1375 24 12* 11.5 115.7 119.0 97.2 1376 23 5•5* 13.3 108.1 119.0 . 90.9 TEST TAKEN IN ALGA ROAD in October, 1970 and Apr11, 1971 I Sta. 34*00 2 14.3 104.0 114.0 91.1 10-28-70 2 Sta. 34+00 4 14.7. 113.7 121.0 93.8 10-28-70 3 Sta. 34*00 . 6 14.7 106.1 114.0 93.0 1048-70 4 Sta. 42+75 2 14.5 105.6 116.3 .90.8 10-3070 5 Sta. 42+75 2 15.2 114.2 121.2 94.3 4.2971 6 Sta. 42+75 4 15.3 104.0 112.8 92.1 4-29-71 7 Sta. 42+75 6 15.4 109.8 1194 91.8 4-29-71 8 Sta. 42+75 8 15.4. 105.8 112.8 93.9 4-29-71 9 Sta. .42+75 10 15.0 112.9 119.4 94.4 4-29-71 * Finished Grade BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. froject No. -10-28D T-44 June 28, 1972 La Costa Meadows Unit No. 1 TABLE OF TEST RESULTS ' Approx- Depth Maximum Imat. of Fill Field Dry Dry Test Location at Test Moisture Density Density Percent No. Lot No. In Feet % dry wt lb/cu ft lb/cu ft Compaction 1377 185 30.0 14.5 102.3 111.3 92.0 1378 185 • 32.5 • 14.6 104.1 . 111.3 93.5 1379 92 1.0 14.3 103.6 .115.0 90.1 1380 • 92 2.3 14.4. 107.7. 117.4 91.8 . Finished grade . . r BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 70-10-28 D 1-i October12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 'Jun. 28, 1972 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS The maximum dry densities and optimum moisture contents of the major Fill materials as deter- mined by the A.S.T.M. D 1557-66T method, that uses 25 blowsof a 10 pound rammer falling from a height of 18 inches on each of 5 layers in a 4 inch diameter 1/30 cubic foot compaction cylinder, are presented as Follows: Maximum Optimum Moist- Dry Density ture Content Soil Type . lb/cu Ft % dry wt Light gray-brown silty fine sand with mica 109.6 12.4 Medium brown Fine to medium sandy clay 126.5 9.4 with scattered gravel Light brown Fine sandy silt . 115.0 13.5 Light gray silty fine sand 116.1 13.2 Yellow silty cloy with light gray streaks 110.7 15.1 Dark gray-black fine sandy clay with Flecks of lime 115.6 13.8 Light yellow-brown silty fine sand with streaks of lime . 113.3. 14.2 Light gray silt (lightly cemented limestone) 96;5 21.6 Medium brown clayey silt 106.7 17.4 Medium brown silty fine to medium sand 121.4 11.3 Gray-brown silty fine sand with clay binder 117.8 13.1 Brown fine sandy clay (topsoil) 118.9 13.0 Light brown-yellow clayey Fine sand 116.9 12.4 Light olive-green silty clay 116.9 13.0 Brown silty clay 110.6 . 16.7 Medium brown fine sandy clay 119.0 13.2 Brown Fine sandy cloy with scattered gravel 119.0 11.5 Light yellow-gray silty Fine sand 117.0 11.7 Light olive-gray clayey silt 109.0 16.2 Gray-yellow slightly silty fine sand 115.3 13.7 Light yellow-brown silty cloy with Fine to medium sand 109.3 14.0 Yellow-brown slightly clayey Fine sand with lime streaks 113.7 13.8 Olive-gray clayey silt with siltstone . 106.4 13.8 Light gray clayey silt with streaks of rust 111.3 16.0 Red-brown silty clay 111.9 15.3 Brown fine to medium sandy clay 120.2 11.5 Gray-brown clayey fins to medium sand 123.3 11.7 Light yellow-brown fine sandy silt . . 115.6 14.4 Medium brown Fine to medium sandy clay with 118.0 12.4 flecks of rust Gray-brown silty fins to medium sand with slltstone 117.4 13.1 Light olive silty clay with siltstone. 117.0 13.7 Dark gray clay (topsoil) 114.0 16.1 Light olive silty Fin, sand 118.3 12.2 Brown silty Fins to coarse sand with 137.8 8.4 30 to 40 percent-gravel . BENTON ENGINEERING. INC. Project No. 701028D 1.4 October 12, 1971 La Costa Meadows No. 1 LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Maximum Optimum Mols- Dry Density Pure Content Sol lType lb/cu fl %drywt Yellow-brown silty fine to medium sand with siltstone 116.0 13.7 Yellow-brown silty fine to medium sand 111.0 15.4 Light gray silty clay with rusty-brown streaks 112.8 16.9 Light brown silty c1aywith rusty streaks 120.6 12.2 Brown-yellow clayey fine sand 116.8 12.4 Light gray Fine to medium sand 105.0 14.2 Light yellow-brown silty fine to medium sand with 116.2 13.5 scattered coarse grains BENrON ENGINEERING. INC. I!I kdicates Approximate Location of Compacted Filled Ground --0---- Indicates Approximate Cut-Fill Line IY Indicates 4pproicirnote Top of Compacted Fill Slope Indicates Approximate Toe of Compacted Fill Slope Eli Indicates Approx'm.:'e Vertical Depth of Fill BENTON ENGINEERING, INC.. SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA LOCATION OF COMPACTED FILLED GROUND• L OCA nON Of COMPA CTED 07 92 REMOVED WOT c0A1PL ETED" LOT /â5 ADDED f/LI SLOPE OF LOT' 185 AND VERTICAL 34' LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT NO.1 SAN DiEGO COUNTY CALIFORNIA SCALE : I" 60' PROJECT NO. DRAWING NO DRAWN: R W 70-10-28D ISAYC. a-ç-71 103 'Os— Arr 000 - Sdo NCI 3 (f\ç LI t •'' "'kI / •:."; ••• i i 7 •. /09 - 93 0ERTIFICATION 7 OF COMPLIAN CITY OF CARLSBAD • Plan Check No. DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS DR., CARLSBAD, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a project and to verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the certification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: Carlsbad Unified 801 Pine Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92009 (434-0610) Encinitas Union 101 South Rancho Santa Fe Rd. Encinitas, CA.. 92024 (619) 944-4300, )c San Marcos Unified 1290 West San Marcos Blvd. San Marcos, CA 92024 (744-4776) San Dieguito Union High School 710 Encinitas Boulevard. Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) Project Applicant: . APN:ZI,S_- -3 10 Project Address: RESIDENTIAL: SQ. FT. of living area O 7/ number of dwelling units / SQ. FT. of covered area SQ. FT. of garage area 59 COMMERCIAL/I TRIAL: SQ. FT. AREA______ Prepa red by Date h, -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 _____Final Map approval and construction started before September 1, 1986. (other school fees paid) Other Residential Fee Levied: $j 7 based on O 97 sq. ft. @ ndust Fee Levied:$ based on sq. ft. @ S AB 2926 and SB 201 .fees are capped at $1.72 per square foot for residential. AB 2926 is capped at .28 per square foot for commercial/industrial. ';: