The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPRE 2021-0005; HIGHLAND DRIVE 5 LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES; Preliminary Review (PRE)' ... CITY OF CARLSBAD APPLICATION FORM FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW APPLICATION CITY USE ONLY Project Number: PRoJecT NAME: ....1i....1.1..!.-!rg~L~t~~~~:::::_...L_~~~~'-1....:.~~1---!-~~~:::=~------ Assessor's Parcel Number(s): / f (,.., u:x:,~1.,1 -c.o 1 1rb -2..0,0 -2--,:-~, 1rt,--J,C,Z>-70 -c::,o, I~'--'loo-g/-c::io Description of proposal (add attachment if necessary): '?,,-r:,p~5e..J -k, a..d:J-u..,1-1~ la./·: kV'!:-8 ~ urt:-e:k.. s lok o /.,-a,v;1¼ q~ ~re;? ~ dwe4p r {'"":Jke- ±N-w1h-, ~ ll pt.r /,~t Would you like to orally present your proposal to your assigned staff planner/engineer? No Please list the staff members you have previously spoken to regarding this project. If none, please so state. O~V1d·o2W ?/~JC,vt (]Nv-l s~ CA~ OWNER NAME (Print): Crc~s ,?-u.l 0~ $,,~, lt~ MAILING ADDRESS: / 181 uu /:--/)y-,),,(,, CITY, STATE, ZIP: b.-.LA'IM~ I ~t4-tllf1,01,'-( TELEPHONE: gs-~--S-Z.~-'t-l'Jt" EMAIL ADDRESS: 9~@. t;;-t'O ,SJ yu-/~~:--.#1:s. c..awt *Owner's signature Indicates permission to conduct a preliminary review for a development proposal. I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF~~ ii~ 1iu2-, APPLICANTNAME(Print):&r,~$ ffe(J {i+Ji,,,~ ,l,iG MAILING ADDRESS: ( 78] ~4-fh""" CITY, STATE, ZIP: 'fi+,.uhi 'f:i t,/,4, t:Jla'1 TELEPHONE: $.f'R-£~<;", Z.l '1 _r EMAIL ADDRESS: :]n.._, &.,,,c.~>.S vc.J-e{-\.e..b 1~~. ,._, I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE OWNER AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CQt~iCT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ~ ~~/2,1 o Te' APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE (Print): --=G;..;.~..;;;;..;;.;i~l);...a~=::..o ..... 5..._ ________________ _ MAILINGADDRESS: //ft']. ~ J)n·ve-, CITY, STATE, ZIP: ~vi,,,~, c,.f.Jr 1U>2'-f I TELEPHONE: $5f" r-u--2-,fC:, S- EMAIL ADDRESS: I CERTIFY THAT I AM THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT AND THAT ALL THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRE E BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ~/~Ju DATE' FEB 2 5 2021 CITY Or 1,..,AKLSBAD r:) ~ !-\ I'\ l 1 ,.-.. -= t \ :· -• ., IN THE PROCESS OF REVIEWING THIS APPLICATION IT MAY BE NECESSARY FOR MEMBERS OF CITY STAFF TO INSPECT AND ENTER T ~AT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS APPLICATION. 1/1/'.JE CONSENT TO ENTRY FOR THIS PURPOSE. FEE REQUIRED/DATE FEE PAID: RECEIVED BY: P-14 Page3 of3 Revised 07/17 PRELIMINARY REVIEW CHECKLIST Staff would like to know what information you primarily want from this review. With this known, we can focus most of our attention on researching and answering your main questions(s). Please check the one or two boxes below which best describes the information you would like us to concentrate on, and/or check the box marked "other" and tell us in your own words what information you would like from us. 0 SITE DESIGN: Focus is on reviewing issues such as development standards (setbacks, building height, etc.), hillside compliance, landscaping, signage, open space requirements, and other physical aspects of zoning. Plans adequately illustrating these features are needed for review. ~ LANDUSE: Focus is on determining the compatibility of the proposed land use with the existing general plan and zoning designations, determining whether staff could support a general plan amendment or zone change, and determining compatibility of the proposed land use with surrounding land uses. 0 ARCHITECTURE: Focus is on establishing quality architecture and checking its compatibility with the surrounding area and against any applicable guidelines or plans. Building elevations or other architectural information are needed for review. IT(" ZONING INTERPRETATIONS: Focus is on interpreting any aspects of the zoning ordinance. ~ LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING STANDARDS: Focus is on reviewing all engineering-related issues, such as grading, drainage, Best Management Practices for Storm Water Pollution Control, circulation and traffic, street vacations, easements, subdivisions, etc. 0 OTHER: In the space below, please list any other issues you would like us to review. P-14 Page2of3 Revised 07/17 0 Cross Real Estate Investors, LLC City of Carlsbad Preliminary Review 02.06.21 Attachments 1. Carlsbad Tract MAP No. 80-46 2. Topographic Survey -dated 2/2/21 3. Topographic Survey with sample lot adjustments -dated 2/2/21 4. Preliminary Site Plan A 5. Preliminary Site Plan B Summary 0 The site currently includes 6 legal lots (5 buildable parcels, 1 driveway parcel) within the subdivision boundary of Map no. 10590. However, the current configuration of these parcels makes for an inefficient site with wasted land area and has resulted in several parcels that are inconsistent with the current zoning. Our goal is to provide new housing as quickly as possible by adjusting the internal lot lines of select parcels in order to create a more usable site, with improved access, and to bring the overall lot sizes more closely in-line with current zoning. We would like to achieve this through simple internal lot adjustments and are requesting guidance from the City through the preliminary review process as to how to best achieve these changes. Questions 1. Are we able to eliminate Lot 6 as part of an internal lot line adjustment and replace with a private drive easement or right-of-way? 2. How many internal lot adjustments can we make without triggering a requirement for a new tentative map? 3. Can a tentative map be waived because we are not creating any new lots? 4. If we were to pursue a new tentative map, would we be eligible to pursue a density bonus? 5. When new lots are created, how which direction will the setbacks face (i.e. will the front yard setbacks face Highland or the private drive)? 6. Is a maintenance agreement sufficient if a single storm water basin is provided for the site? 7. Does the Fire Department have a preference for a turnaround; hammer head vs. cul-de-sac? 8. Given that there is a fire hydrant directly located on the street adjacent to the site, would another hydrant be required to be located on the site? 9. What approach would the city recommend we take in order to 'normalize' the lot sizes and layout as proposed? 10. What other planning and engineering considerations should we be taking into account with regard to our proposal? FEB 2 5 2021 CIT'{ or= CA.r-ZLSBAG ~ --~~~\!~~ !!\~s ~~'./~ s::.