The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2022-01-10; Historic Preservation Commission; ; 2685, 2687 and 2689 Garfield St ITEM #1 Meeting Date: January 10, 2022 To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Sheila Crosby, Deputy Library Director Staff Contact: Sheila Crosby, Sheila.crosby@carlsbadca.gov Subject: 2685, 2687 & 2689 Garfield St. District: District 1 Recommended Action Receive information requested by the Historic Presevation Commission on the property of interest. Executive Summary/Discussion Commissioner Díaz requested a discussion around 2685, 2687 & 2689 Garfield St, otherwise referenced as Victor Condo. Here are the staff’s findings: • The condominiums were designed in 1980 by Kathleen McCormick and Armistead Smith. The site consists of 3 units, 2685/2687/2689 Garfield St. • 2685 last sold in January 2020. • Exhibit 1, dated September 2020, contains the city's response to a preliminary project proposal that was submitted for the site. • Exhibit 1, section 3 references a scope of work proposing the construction of a new 5435-square-foot three-unit condominium with three attached two-car garages to replace the existing three-unit condominium. • Exhibit 2, dated October 2021, contains the Historical Analysis Letter Report stating that historical research indicates that the Property is not historically and/or architecturally significant, and is not eligible for designation under local, state, or national significance criteria. Next Steps The applicant has requested that the project’s historical resources consultant, Scott Moomjian, provide additional analysis to the Historical Analysis report. They will be submitting additional HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Staff Report ITEM #1 information and analysis on post-modern architecture in the coming weeks. Once the Planning Division receives the updated report, a third-party historical resources consultant will review the report to ensure accuracy. The Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on the proposed development once the third-party consultant finishes their review of the report. Fiscal Analysis There is no fiscal impact to the city at this time Public Notification Public notice of this item was posted in keeping with the Ralph M. Brown Act and was available for public viewing and review at least 72 hours before the scheduled meeting date. Exhibits 1. September 2020 Planning Division Comment Letter 2. October 2021 Historic Resources Report Exhibit 1 ITEM #1 September 24, 2020 John Bewery/BGI Architecture 2292 Faraday Ave, Suite 100 Carlsbad, CA 92008 SUBJECT: PRE 2020-0024 (DEV2020-0205) -3 on Garfield APN: 203-141•27-01, 203•141•27•02, 203·141·27.03 Ccityof Carlsbad BFILE COPY /Y/ttl/~I 'f /z yz. Thank you for submitting a preliminary review for a new three-unit condominium project proposed at 2685-2689 Garfield Street. The project site, an approximately 7,000-square-foot lot, currently developed with a three-unit condominium. In response to your application, the Planning Division has prepared this comment letter. Please note that the purpose of a preliminary review is to provide you with direction and comments on the overall concept of your project. This preliminary review does not represent an in-depth analysis of your project. It is intended to give you feedback on critical issues based upon the information provided in your submittal. This review is based upon the ~lans, policies, and standards in effect as of the date of this review. Please be aware that at the time of a formal application submittal. new plans, policies, and standards may be in effect and additional issues of concern may be raised through a more specific and detailed review. Planning: General 1. General Plan and zoning designations for the property are as follows: a. General Plan: R-15 Residential, 8-15 units/ac. Growth Management Control Point of 11.5 units/ac. b. Zoning: R-3 Multiple-Family Residential Zone c. The site is located within the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ). 2. Local Coastal Program designations for the property are as follows: a. The Coastal Land Use designation and Zone are the same as the General Plan and Zoning above. b. The site is located within the Mello II Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) within the appealable jurisdiction of the California Coastal Commission (CCC). 3. The project requires approval from the Planning Commission for the following permits: a. Minor Planned Development Permit (PUD} is required for. the construction of condominium units pursuant to Carlsbad Municipal Code {CMC) Section 21.45.020. Community Development Department . Planning Division I 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008-7314 I 760-602-4600 I 760-602-8560 f I www.carlsbadca.gov __ _.. .. ._ .,__,.I P••lad •-""'•-- Exhibit 1 ITEM #1 PRE 2020-0024 (DEV2020-0205) -3 on Garfield September 24, 2020 Page 2 b. Site Development Plan is required pursuant to CMC Section 21.82.040 as the property is located within the Beach Area Overlay Zone. c. Coastal Development Permit (CDP) for development in the coastal zone. d. Nonconforming Construction Permit (NCP) to allow the continuation of the legally established use of three dwelling units on a property where a maximum of two units are permitted pursuant to CMC Section 21.48.0SO(E). 3. As described in the scope of work, this preliminary review is for the construction of a new SA35- square-foot three-unit condominium with three attached two-car garages to replace the existing three-unit condominium. Based on the size of the lot (0.16 acres) and the allowed density on the property's land use designation (R-15, or 8-15 dwelling units per acre), a maximum of two units are allowed on the property. Approval of a Nonconforming Construction Permit (NCP) is required to allow the legally established use of three dwelling units on a property where a maximum of two units are permitted. The Carlsbad Municipal Code permits multi-family dwellings within the R-3 zone. Therefore, staff supports the proposed residential project subject to compliance with all applicable CMC standards, including but not limited to Chapters 21.16 (R-3 Multiple-Family Residential Zone), 21.44 (Parking), 21.45 (Planned Developments), 21.48 (Nonconforming Lots, Structures and Uses), and 21.82 (Beach Area Overlay Zone). Specifically, staff has concerns with the following: a. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.48.030(A), an application that includes an NCP shall include evidence that the existing three-unit condominium was legally established. b. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.82.050, flat areas of the roof may not exceed 24 feet in height as measured from grade. Pia ns show flat roof areas exceeding 24 feet at stairwell and roof deck. c. The project proposes a pitched roof with a one-foot-tall parapet around its perimeter. If a building height above 24 feet is proposed, the pitched roof shall be visible. d. The center-most roof ridge (pitched roof section) exceeds the 30-foot height limit. · e. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.46.020, roof protrusions are allowed for stairwells but may only protrude the portions necessary to accommodate or enclose the intended use. The portions of the stairwell allowed to protrude would be the single flight of stairs leading to the roof-top deck. The flat-roofed portion of the stairwell is thus limited to 24 feet in height. f. Pursuant to CMC Section 21.46.120, the following projections are not allowed: i. Stairwells: open stairways may project into the required yards. Enclosed stairwells, however, may not since they contain internal floor area. ii. Bedroom terraces at front and rear yard setbacks: these types of projections are allowed when they do not extend above the level of the first floor. Pursuant to the basement definition in CMC Section 21.04.045, the garage level does not qualify as a basement and is Exhibit 1 ITEM #1 PRE 2020-0024 (DEV2020-0205) -3 on Garfield September 24, 2020 Page 3 therefore considered the first floor, causing the bedroom terraces to be located at the at the second floor. iii. Entry terrace at rear yard setback: similar to the bedroom terraces, this projection extends above the level of the first floor. However, on-grade (existing or proposed, whichever is lower) flatwork in permitted. g. Mechanical equipment may not encroach into 20-foot-by-20-foot parking clearance. Please show the location of all mechanical equipment, including air conditioners, forced air units, and water heaters. h. Pursuant to Table C of Section 21.45.060 (C.5) the driveway shall have decorative pavement. i. Pursuant to 21.82.060(C)(5), for properties located in the BAOZ, visitor parking spaces may not be provided on the street. One visitor guest space is required to be located within the private property. j. Please show location of electrical transformer (if required -please confirm with SDGE). Transformer and other utilities shall be located away from sidewalks or pedestrian access areas. Utilities shall be screened with landscaping to the maximum extent feasible. k. Please show trash and recycle bin storage location. If bins are stored inside the garage, they may not encroach into 20-foot-by-20-foot parking clearance. Additionally, show trash staging location. Staff does not support staging the trash and recycling cans on the street in that staging the bins on the street on trash day may not be possible or practical due to parked cars. Please coordinate with Waste Management. A "will-serve"· letter from Waste Management will be requested by the Planning Division. 4. The Housing Crisis Act of 2019 {SB 330) established a preliminary streamline application proce.ss for housing projects. It is not mandatory unless applicants seek the vesting and processing benefits offered under SB 330. Participation in the SB 330 streamline process would occur first, followed by the formal development application process required under Government Code (Gov. Code)§§ 65940, 65941, 65941.5, and Carlsbad Municipal Code (CMC) § 21.42.050. Acceptance by the city of a complete SB 330 Streamline Application (Form P-32} and fee will vest the project for 180 days in accordance with the ordinances, policies and standards in effect at the time the SB 330 Application is accepted. The city is finalizing the application form and process for SB 330 Streamline Applications. Please contact planning@carlsbadca.gov for more information. 5. Per the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (SB 330), any project that includes the removal or demolition of a "protected unit" is required to provide the occupants with 1) relocation benefits (Gov. Code § 7260 et seq.), and 2) right of first refusal for a comparable unit available in the new housing development. (Gov. Code § 66300 (d)(-2)(D}.} "Protected units" are generally defined by Gov. Code § 66300(d)(2)(E}(ii) as including residential units subject to affordability restrictions, price controls, or occupied by low income households. The formal submittal of the project will need to include documentation regarding any existing "protected units." 6. New requirements related to the city's goals to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will likely impact development requirements of this project. A formal application submittal will need to include Exhibit 1 ITEM #1 PRE 2020-0024 (DEV2020-0205)-3 on Garfield September 24, 2020 Page4 a completed Climate Action Plan Checklist (Form P-30) to determine what requirements will apply to the project. New GHG reduction requirements are related to energy efficiency, photovoltaic, electric vehicle charging, water heating and traffic demand management requirements, as set forth in the California Green Building Standards Code and in cartsbad Municipal Code Chapters 18.21, 18.30 and 18.51 which is available on the city's website at the following address:· http://www.qcode.us/codes/carlsbad/view.php?topic=18&frames=on To the extent that new GHG reduction requirements are in effect at the time of application for grading or building permits, the project will be required to comply with the effective requirements even if different than what is proposed in the project's planning approvals. GHG reduction requirements may impact, but are not limited to, site design and local building code requirements. If incorporating new GHG reduction requirements results· in substantial modifications to the project after planning approvals are obtained, then prior to issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant may be required to submit and receive approval of a Consistency Determination or an Amendment application for the project through the Planning Division. 7. All development applications that require Planning Commission or City Council approval shall provide early public notification. This requirement may be met by sending a public notice to the surrounding property owners (600-foot radius) within 30 days of submittal of the development application pursuant to City Council Policy No. 84 and Form P-21. The policy and form may be referenced online at: City Council Policy No. 84: http://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/fi1ebank/blobdload.aspx?Blob1D=35578. Form P-21: https://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.asox?Blob1D=24117 8. Please contact Randall Metz, Fire Inspections (760-602-4661), to ensure the partially-covered driveway complies with emergency access requirements. All necessary application forms, submittal requirements, and fe·e information are available at the Planning counter located in the Faraday Building at 1635 Faraday Avenue or online at http://www.carlsbadca.gov/services/depts/planning/default.asp. You may also access the General Plan Land Use Element and the Zoning Ordinance online at the website address shown; select Department Listing; select Planning Home Page. Please review all information carefully before submitting. Land Development Engineering: 1. Complete a Stormwater Standards Questionnaire. This questionnaire will guide you and the City in determining what type of reports and storm water mitigation must be completed to satisfy state and City storm water quality requirements. The questionnaire can be printed from the following website link: http://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?Blob1D=22711 Exhibit 1 ITEM #1 PRE 2020-0024 (DEV2020-0205) -3 on Garfield September 24, 2020 Page 5 Preliminary analysis suggests that the project is a Standard Project and subject to installing site design and source control BMPs per Chapter 4 of the Carlsbad BMP Design Manual and per the Standard Project Requirement Checklist (E36) that will also need to be completed. The link to the form is at: http://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?Blob1D=30141 2. Show proposed driveway cut and driveway. 3. Verify that the existing pedestrian ramp at the intersection complies with current ADA standards. 4. Provide a preliminary Geotechnical study that identifies feasibility and recommendations for the proposed project. 5. A recent Preliminary Title Report (PTR) will be required with formal project application submittal. 6. All easements and encumbrances identified in the PTR must be indicated on the site plan. 7. Show all existing utilities in Garfield St. and Beech Ave, including water and sewer services for the property. 8. On the site plan, show and identify all existing surface improvements (curb, gutter, sidewalk, paving, manholes, inlets, street lights, adjacent driveways, vaults, transformers, etc.) at the project frontage and within 25 feet for both Garfield St. and Beech Ave. 9. Show existing and proposed contour lines onsite and extend at least 25 feet beyond property lines. 10. Show the locations of all existing and proposed buildings, walls, fences, and permanent structures onsite and within 25 feet of site. 11. Provide multiple cross-sections of the site to demonstrate differences in grade, including adjacent properties. 12. Indicate the volume of grading (cut, fill, import, export, remedial) proposed for the project in cubic yards. 13. Show proposed finished floor elevation. 14. Please be advised that in order to make a more in-depth review of the proposed development, a more complete design of the project is required. Building Department: 1. A minimum of 5.7 square feet required for bedroom egress windows for center unit. 2. Solar zone encroaches into the fire access pathways at hip roofs. 3. Fireplace flue for center unit to meet CMC 802.5.4. Exhibit 1 ITEM #1 PRE 2020-0024 (DEV20Z0-0Z0S}-3 on Garfield September 24, 2020 Page 6 If you would like to schedule a meeting to discuss this letter with the commenting departments, please contact Esteban Danna at the number below. You may also contact each department individually as follows: • Planning Division: Esteban Danna, Associate Planner, at (760) 602-4629 • Land Development Engineering: Allison McLaughlin, Project Engineer, at (760) 602-2732 • Fire Department: Randall Metz, Fire Inspections, at (760) 602-4661 • Building Department: Jason Pasuit, Building Official (760) 602-2788 Sincerely, DON NEU, AICP City Planner DN:ED:cf c: Renee Wailes, 2729 Ocean Street, Carlsbad, CA 92008 Allison Mclaughlin, Project Engin~er Fire Prevention HPRM/File Copy Data Entry Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 Scott A. Moomjian Attorney at Law 5173 Waring Road, #145 San Diego, California 92120 Telephone (619) 230-1770 Facsimile (619) 785-3340 smoomj ian@earthlink.net October 11, 2021 City of Carlsbad Development Services 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 Re: Historical Analysis Letter Report For 2685, 2687 & 2689 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, California 92008; Assessor's Parcel Numbers 203-141-27-01, 02 & 03 Dear City of Carlsbad Planning Department: Please allow this Historical Analysis Letter Report to serve as the required environmental documentation/evaluation related to potential historical resources under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the 2685, 2687 and 2689 Garfield Street, Carlsbad California 92008 building ("Property"). The Property is legally defined as an undivided 1 /3 fractional interest in and to Parcel 1 in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, as shown on Page 12124 in Book of Parcel Maps filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 20, 1982. It consists of three (3) legal parcels: Assessor's Parcel Numbers 203-141-27-01, 02 and 03. As detailed below, the Property contains one (1) Postmodern style condominium building with three (3) units, identified as 2685, 2687 and 2689 Garfield Street. It is two-stories in height with mezzanine and garage areas. Built in 1982, the structure is today thirty-nine (39) years of age. It was designed by the architectural firm of Armistead Smith and Others between 1980- 1981 and completed by Westward Construction Company in 1982. Over the years, the Property has suffered from structural, foundation, and moisture/mold intrusion issues. Historical research indicates that the Property is not historically and/or architecturally significant, and is not eligible for designation under local, state, or national significance criteria. In addition, the Property is not significant under CEQA and the proposed project, which involves the removal ( demolition) of the structure, will not result in cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource. Therefore, no mitigation measures need be proposed. 1 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 Historical Background The 2685, 2687 and 2689 Garfield Street building is located on a 6,998 square foot lot (.16 acre) and is generally rectangular in shape with a projecting front-fayade, cantilevered section above the rear garage areas, and open upper rear balcony/deck areas. Overall, the building consists of approximately 6,998 total square feet of living space. The site is bounded by Ocean Street to the west, Beech A venue to the south, Carlsbad Boulevard to the east, and Cypress A venue to the north. The overall neighborhood setting largely consists of one to three- story, single-family construction. Over the years, new residential development has proliferated throughout the surrounding environment. History O{Carlsbad Mission San Luis Rey de Franca was constructed in 1798 near present-day Oceanside. The mission's lands encompassed present-day Carlsbad north to the current location of Camp Pendleton, east to Santa Ysabel, and south past Encinitas. The establishment of the mission had detrimental effects on the Native American communities within the area, as the fathers focused upon religious conversion and utilization of Native American labor to develop and maintain the cattle ranches, orchards, and water systems necessary for the mission's operation. 1 In 1821, Mexico gained independence from Spain and the missions were soon secularized. As a result of the secularization, mission lands were divided up and granted to prominent Mexican families by the Mexican government. Juan Maria Marron II was granted 13,311 acres in 1842, naming the land grant Rancho Agua Hedionda. The grant included present-day Carlsbad and Carlsbad Ranch. After Marr6n's death in 1853, the ranch was divided up among his family; however, financial troubles eventually led to the land being sold to Francis Hinton in 1865. Hinton then hired Robert Kelly, who later inherited the ranch from Hinton.2 In 1880, Kelly granted the Southern California Railway a coastal right-of-way that allowed for a connection between San Diego and Los Angeles. In 1883, John Frazier and his family settled on 160 acres near the railroad line, just south of Buena Vista Lagoon. Unfortunately, a lack of potable water made it difficult for Frazier to farm the land. As a result, he hired expert well borers, the Mull Brothers, to dig a well on his property in 1885. The boring for the well resulted in the discovery of both mineral and artesian water at 245 feet, which increased the value of the land by 50 percent. After discovering the water, Frazier constructed a platform near the rail line, called Frazier's Station, and gave water to passengers.3 The water from Frazier's well was tested and found to match the mineral content of Well Number Nine in the Karlsbad Bohemia Spas. After hearing about Frazier's well, Gerhard 1 Brian F. Smith & Associates, Historic Structure Assessment for 1534 Magnolia Avenue, Carlsbad, California (APN 205-220-15), August 31, 2018, p.4. 2 Ibid. 3 Ibid. 2 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 Schutte, D.D. Wadsworth, Henry Nelson, and Samuel Church Smith came to the area in 1886 and formed a real estate investment group (the Carlsbad Land and Water Company) in order to associate the land with the famous Karlsbad Bohemia Spas. Once formed, the Carlsbad Land and Water Company purchased 270 acres ofland from Frazier and 130 acres of coastal lands, all located outside of the Kelly Rancho Agua Hedionda Land Grant. The company drilled additional wells and water was piped throughout the newly purchased lands, which Schutte and Wadsworth platted as a new townsite. They also built the Carlsbad Hotel in 1888, which was destroyed by a fire in 1896.4 Despite Frazier's well and the efforts of the Carlsbad Land and Water Company, during the late 1890s, drought forced farmers in the region to implement dry farming as the primary method of agriculture. When Robert Kelly died in 1890, Rancho Agua Hedionda passed to his brother Matthew's nine children, who subsequently divided up the land among themselves. Not only did the drought necessitate a change in agricultural practices, but it also resulted in a land bust. The population of Carlsbad dwindled to nearly 150 people and even Samuel Church Smith and his family left Carlsbad for National City. Alexander Shipley purchased the Smith home in the 1890s, relocating to the area with his family from Calistoga. 5 In 1906, the waterworks sourced by Frazier's well were no longer operational and Shipley paid to get the pipelines back up and running. In 1914, the South Coast Land Company drilled wells in the San Luis Rey Valley and began piping water to Carlsbad. The South Coast Land Company had also purchased all of the Carlsbad Land and Water Company lands. The new availability of water caused Carlsbad to once again grow. People, particularly farmers, began arriving in Carlsbad in great numbers and in 1916, the first avocado grove was planted. The avocado did so well in the area that the South Coast Land Company began selling larger tracts of land for the new owners to use for agriculture.6 Property History Historical research indicates that the Property was constructed in 1982. According to the Residential Building Record, a City Building Permit was filed by Westward Construction in May 1981 for the construction of "3 Condos" at cost of approximately $215,016.7 Review of original architectural plans indicates that the condominium design ("Vigil/McGrath·Victor·Condo") was prepared for owners John McGrath of La Jolla and Dr. J.M. Vigil of Claremont, California by "Armistead Smith and Others" of Del Mar between November 1980-March 1981.8 A Notice of Completion filed on the property indicates that the building was completed for John B. McGrath 4 Ibid. 5 Smith, p.5. 6 Smith, p.7. 7 County of San Diego Building Records, 2687 & 2689 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, California, Assessor's Parcel Numbers 203-141 -27-02 & 02. See Attachment I. 8 City of Carlsbad, Plans #80-944, Building Department Approved May 8, 1981; Armistead Smith and Others, "Virgil/McGrath·Victor·Condo," November 26, 1980 and March 9, 1981, pp. l-15. 3 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 and Joseph M. Vigil, M.D. by Westward Construction, Inc. in May 1982.9 The firm of Armistead Smith and Others was founded by principal Armistead ("Ted") B. Smith III in 1973. Smith designed his first building, a home for his family, in 1975. In 1980, he designed the first of a series of shared houses ( each with six suites and a private exterior). Called "GoHomes," Smith then built five more such homes over the next five years, each with six to eight suites. These buildings provided affordable ownership in the expensive Del Mar Terrace area. Soon thereafter, Smith moved downtown and collaborated with his partner Kathleen McCormick to produce GoHomes and luxury town homes at affordable market rate ownership and rents.10 Over most of his career, Smith controlled the financing, and secured the real estate, design, construction, marketing and sales of his finished products. 11 Architectural Description The 2685, 2687 and 2689 Garfield Street property largely consists of a three-unit Postmodern style condominium building. The structure is two-stories in height and includes three mezzanines and three attached garages. The building is generally rectangular in shape and consists of approximately of approximately 6,998 total square feet of living space. Of sub-standard wood-frame construction, the building is set on a concrete and concrete block foundation with floor joists. The roof is flat and shed with no eave overhang. Roofing material consists of composition shingle. The building has three thick chimneys, all clad in stucco. The exterior is also stucco. According to the Residential Building Record, fenestration consists of double-hung and casement. Along the main ( east) elevation, there is a projecting fayade section. This fa9ade includes three condominium entries. The entries are high-pitched and front-gabled. One gable entry features stepped side corners and flat apex, while the other two have sloping side corners and arched and pointed apexes. The gables are clad in horizontal wood siding with decorative cut- outs and open upper and lower sections which feature rounded glass block walls. Overall, the structure appears to be in good condition. Integrity Evaluation In addition to determining the significance of a property under local, state, and national criteria, a property must also possess integrity. Integrity is defined by the National Register of Historic Places as the "ability of a Property to convey and maintain its significance." The local, 9 Notice of Completion, Official Records of San Diego County, Number 82-172978, June 7, 1982. See Attachment 2. 10 "Architect as Developer: The San Diego Story," https://aiscalifornia.org/architect-as-developer-the-san-diego- story/, April 20, 2012. 11 Build LLC, "Ted Smith: Architectural Super-Hero," https://blog.buildllc.com/2009/04/ted-smith-architectural- super-hero/, April l, 2009. 4 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 Location Location is defined by the National Register as "the place where the historic property was constructed or the place where the historic event occurred." The Property was built in 1982 at its current location. Therefore, the structure retains its location element for integrity purposes. Design Design is defined by the National Register as the "combination of elements that create the form, plan, space, structure, and style of a property." Over the years, the Property has not been substantially modified and/or altered from that of its original appearance. As such, the Property retains its design element for integrity purposes. Setting Setting is defined by the National Register as the physical environment of a historic property. The Property has been located at its current site since its original construction in 1982. Inspection of the surrounding residential neighborhood today indicates the presence of some original single-family homes. Many homes within the immediate area have been removed or remodeled over the years, and the overall physical environment of the area has been adversely impacted by new residential construction to the extent that the Property no longer retains its original setting for integrity purposes. Materials Materials are defined by the National Register as the physical elements that were combined or deposited during a particular period of time and in a particular pattern or configuration to form a historic property. The materials which have gone into the construction of the Property are largely original. As such, the Property retains its materials elements for integrity purposes. Workmanship Workmanship is defined by the National Register as "the physical evidence of the crafts of a particular culture or people during any given period in history or prehistory." As with the materials discussion above, the workmanship which has gone into the construction of the Property is largely original. As such, the Property retains its workmanship elements for integrity purposes. 5 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 Feeling Feeling is defined by the National Register as "a property's expression of the aesthetic or historic sense of a particular period of time." In its current condition, the Property imparts an aesthetic sense of early 1980s construction. As a result, the Property retains its feeling elements for integrity purposes. Association Association is defined by the National Register as "the direct link between an important historic event or person and a historic property." The Property is not directly linked to any important historic events or persons. As a result, the Property does not possess, nor has it ever possessed, an associative element for integrity purposes. Application Of Carlsbad Historic Resources Inventory Criteria For a historic resource to be considered and approved by the Carlsbad City Council for inclusion in the City of Carlsbad Historic Resources Inventory, a resource must be found significant at the local, state, or national level, under one or more of the following criteria: Criterion A It exemplifies or reflects special elements of the city's cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history. No historical evidence was identified which would support the contention that the Property exemplifies or reflects special elements of Carlsbad's cultural, social, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history. The building in no way exemplifies or reflects "special elements" of the City's history any more than other, similarly situated, existing structures located within the community. Consequently, the Property is not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad Criterion A. Criterion B It is identified with persons or events significant in local, state, or national history. No historical evidence was identified which would suggest that the Property was ever associated with any persons or events significant in local, state, or national history. Consequently, the Property is not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad Criterion B. 6 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 Criterion C It embodies distinctive characteristics of a style, type, period, or method of construction, is a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship, or is representative of a notable work of an acclaimed builder, designer, or architect. The Property was designed as a Postmodern condominium building by architect Armistead Smith between 1980-1981. It was constructed by Westward Construction, Inc. in 1982. In its current condition, the building is not considered a representative example of the Postmodern architectural style and is not considered a valuable example of the use of indigenous materials or craftsmanship. In this regard, the building does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a sty le, type, period, or method of Postmodern construction. The Postmodern movement generally occurred between the late 1960s to the present. Houses designed in this style imitate elements of traditional styles. The result is both familiar and original. It is common to reference several different historical styles within one design, creating an interesting juxtaposition of period and regional elements. Advocates of the Postmodern style believed it was more important to absorb and reformulate traditional components than to continue constructing glass boxes void of heritage. While paying homage to the past, many houses within this stylistic movement feature playful designs and ironic combinations. Elements could be exaggerated, manipulated, and even distorted. 12 While the Property possesses several elements indicative of the Postmodern style, including its three front-gabled entries, sides, and use of block glass, horizontal siding, and stucco material, the building does not reference any specific historical sty le, period, or regional characteristics in its design/construction. Further, the use of these elements expressed in the design does not appear to be particularly exaggerated, manipulated, or distorted to the extent that the final execution warrants merit. As a result, the Property is not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad Criterion C. In addition, no historical evidence was identified to support the contention that either Armistead Smith or Westward Construction, Inc. are acclaimed builders, designers, or architects. Further, the building does not represent the notable work of either Smith or Westward Construction. The Property is not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad Criterion C. Criterion D It is an archaeological, paleonto/ogical, botanical, geological, topographical, ecological, or geographical site, which has the potential of yielding information of scientific value. The Property is not an archaeological, paleontological, botanical, geological, topographical, ecological, or geographical site, and therefore, is not eligible for designation 12 Virginia Savage McAlester, A Field Guide To American Houses, pp.664-665. 7 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 under City of Carlsbad Criterion D. Criterion E It is a geographically definable area with a concentration of buildings, structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, settings, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association, in which the collective value of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual improvement. The Property is not a geographically definable area with a concentration of buildings structures, improvements, or objects linked historically through location, design, settings, materials, workmanship, feeling, and/or association, in which the collective value of the improvements may be greater than the value of each individual improvement. The Property is, therefore, not eligible for designation under City of Carlsbad Criterion E. Application O[National and California Register Criteria When evaluated within its historic context, a property must be shown to be significant for one or more of the four Criteria for Evaluation-A, B, C, or D. The Criteria describe how properties are significant for their association with important events or persons, for their importance in design or construction, or for their information potential. In addition, a property must not only be shown to be significant under the National and/or California Register criteria, but it also must have integrity. The seven aspects of integrity include: location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. National Register Criterion A: Event: California Register Criterion 1: Event To be considered for listing under Criterion A, a property must be associated with one or more events important in the defined historic context. The event or trends must clearly be important within the associated context. Mere association with historic events or trends is not enough, in and of itself, to qualify under Criterion A: the property's specific association must be considered important as well. The Property does not qualify under National Register Criterion A (Event) or California Register Criterion 1 (Event) at either the local, state, or national levels. Historical research failed to identify any important events associated with the building over the course of its existence. National Register Criterion B: Person: California Register Criterion 2: Person Criterion B applies to a Property associated with individuals whose specific contributions to history can be identified and documented. Persons "significant in our past" refers to individuals whose activities are demonstrably important within a local, state, or national historic context. The criterion is generally restricted to those Properties that illustrate (rather than commemorate) a person's important achievements. The persons associated with the Property 8 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 must be individually significant within a historic context. Significant individuals must be directly associated with the nominated property. A Property eligible under Criterion B are usually those associated with a person's productive life, reflecting the time period when he or she achieved significance. Speculative associations are not acceptable. Documentation must make clear how the nominated property represents an individual's significant contributions. A Property must retain integrity from the period of its significant historic associations. Architects are often represented by their works, which are eligible under Criterion C. The Property does not qualify under National Register Criterion B (Person) or California Register Criterion 2 (Person) at either the local, state, or national levels. Historical research failed to identify any important individuals associated with the building over the course of its existence. National Register Criterion C: Design/Construction: California Register Criterion 3: Design/Construction A Property may be eligible under Criterion C if it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. A property which embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period,· or method of construction refers to the way in which a property was conceived, designed, or fabricated by a people or culture in past periods of history. Distinctive characteristics are the physical features or traits that commonly recur in individual types, periods, or methods of construction. To be eligible, a property must clearly contain enough of those characteristics to be considered a true representative of a particular type, period, or method of construction. A master is a figure of generally recognized greatness in a field, a known craftsman of consummate skill, or an anonymous craftsman whose work is distinguishable from others by its characteristic style and quality. The Property must express a particular phase in the development of the master's career, an aspect oj his or her work, or a particular theme in his or her craft. Embodying The Distinctive Characteristics Of A Type, Period, Or Method Of Construction The Property does not qualify under National or California Register Criterion C: Design/Construction on the basis of its architecture at either the local, state, or national levels. The Property was constructed as a Postmodern condominium building by architect Armistead Smith between 1980-1981. It was constructed by Westward Construction, Inc. in 1982. In its current condition, the building is not considered a representative example of the Postmodern architectural style. In this regard, the building does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of Postmodern construction. The Postmodern movement generally occurred between the late 1960s to the present. Houses designed in this style imitate elements of traditional styles. The result is both familiar 9 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 and original. It is common to reference several different historical styles within one design, creating an interesting juxtaposition of period , and regional elements. Advocates of the Postmodern style believed it was more important to absorb and reformulate traditional components than to continue constructing glass boxes void of heritage. While paying homage to the past, many houses within this stylistic movement feature playful designs and ironic combinations. Elements could be exaggerated, manipulated, and even distorted. While the Property possesses several elements indicative of the Postmodern style, including its three front-gabled entries, sides, and use of block glass, horizontal siding, and stucco material, the building does not reference any specific historical style, period, or regional characteristics in its design/construction. Further, the use of these elements expressed in the design does not appear to be particularly exaggerated, manipulated, or distorted to the extent that the final execution warrants merit. Representing The Work Of A Master (National Register) And/Or Important. Creative Individual (California Register) The Property does not qualify under National or California Register Criterion C: Design/Construction at either the local, state, or national levels as a structure which represents the work of a master and/or important, creative individual. Historical research indicates that the Property was designed by architect Annistead Smith (still in practice) and built by Westward Construction, Inc. No historical evidence was identified to support the contention that either Smith or Westward Construction are "masters" or "important, creative individuals." Moreover, the building does not represent the work of either Smith or Westward Construction as "masters or "important, creative individuals." Possessing High Artistic Values The Property does not qualify under National or California Register Criterion C: Design/Construction as a structure which possesses high artistic values. The building does not articulate a concept of design to the extent that aesthetic ideals are expressed. National Register Criterion D: Information Potential; California Register Criterion 4: Information Potential A Property may be eligible under Criterion D if it has yielded, or may likely yield, information important in prehistory or history. The Property does not qualify under National or California Criterion D: Information Potential as the Property has not yielded, and is not likely not to yield, information important in terms of history or prehistory. 10 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 National Register Criteria Consideration G-Properties That Have Achieved Significance Within The Past Fifty (50) Years (Exceptional Importance) Ordinarily, properties that have achieved significance within the past fifty years shall not be considered eligible for the National Register. However, such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of historic districts that meet the National Register criteria, or if they meet Criteria Consideration G-a property achieving significance within the last fifty years is eligible for the National Register if it is of" exceptional importance. " The National Register Criteria for Evaluation exclude properties that achieved significance within the last fifty years unless they are of exceptional importance. Fifty years is a general estimate of the time needed to develop historical perspective and to evaluate significance. This consideration guards against the listing of properties of passing contemporary interest and ensures that the National Register is a list of truly historic places. The phrase "exceptional importance" does not require that the property be of national significance. It is a measure of a property's importance within the appropriate historic context, whether the scale of that context is local, state, or national. A property that has achieved significance within the past fifty years can be evaluated only when sufficient historical perspective exists to determine that the property is exceptionally important. The necessary perspective can be provided by scholarly research and evaluation and must consider both the historic context and the specific property's role in that context. The Property was constructed in 1982. Therefore, it is thirty-nine (39) years of age. As such, the structure is less than fifty (50) years of age, and therefore, subject to National Register Criterion Consideration G. No historic evidence was identified which would support the contention that the Property is of "exceptional importance" in terms of local, state, or national history. Consequently, the structure, as less than fifty (50) years of age, does not qualify for the National Register under Criterion Consideration G (Exceptional Importance). Findings and Conclusions Impacts Discussion The present study has determined that the Property is not historically and/or architecturally significant under local, state, and national significance criteria. Therefore, the project which proposes the removal (demolition) of the structure, will not impact an historical resource. Application of CEOA Public Resources Code CEQA Public Resources Code §21084.1 provides that any project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have 11 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 a significant effect on the environment. Public Resources Code Section §5020.l(q) defines "substantial adverse change" as demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of the historical resource would be impaired. According to Public Resources Code Section §5024.1, an historical resource is a resource that is listed in, or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. A resource may be listed as an historical resource in the California Register if it meets any of the following National Register of Historic Places criteria: 1) is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; 2) is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; 3) embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or 4) has yielded, or may likely yield information important in prehistory or history. In addition, an historical resource is a resource that is listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources; a resource that is included in a local register of historical resources; or is identified as significant in an historical resource survey if that survey meets specified criteria. a) Event Association: The Property does not qualify under event association as a resource which is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage. Historical research indicates that the building was never associated with any event or events that have made a significant contribution to California's history and cultural heritage. b) Individual Association: The Property does not qualify under individual association as a resource which is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. Historical research indicates that the building was never associated with any important or significant individuals. c) Design/Construction: The Property do not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. The building does not represent the work of an important creative individual, or possess high artistic values. d) Information Potential: The Property does not qualify under information potential as a resource which has yielded, or may likely yield, information important in prehistory or history. As a resource which is not historically or architecturally significant, the Property is not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, the California Historic 12 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 Resources Inventory, the National Register of Historic Places, or the City of Carlsbad's Historic Register. California Register Special Consideration-Properties That Have Achieved Significance Within The Past Fifty (50) Years (Sufficient Time) In order to understand the historic importance of a resource, "sufficient time" must have passed to obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource. A resource less than fifty (50) years old may be considered/or listing in the California Register if it can be demonstrated that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance. The Property was constructed in 1982. Therefore, it is thirty-nine (39) years of age. As such, the structure is less than fifty (50) years of age, and therefore, subject to California Register Special Consideration Properties That Have Achieved Significance Within The Past Fifty (50) Years (Sufficient Time). As a structure which is only thirty-nine (39) years of age, "sufficient time" has not yet passed to obtain a scholarly perspective and understand any potential historical importance. No historic evidence was identified which would support the contention that the Property is significant in terms of local, state, or national history. Consequently, the structure, as less than fifty (50) years of age, does not qualify for the California Register under Special Consideration (Sufficient Time). CEOA Guidelines According to CEQA Guidelines §15064.5(a)(3), a lead agency can find a resource historic if the resource has been determined to be significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California, provided that the determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. The Property has been determined not to be significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California. The building, therefore, does not qualify as a historical resource under CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(a)(3). The proposed project involves the removal (demolition) of the Property. The proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource or have a significant effect on the environment. This is due to the fact that the present analysis has determined that the Property is not historically and/or architecturally significant under local, state, and national significance criteria. Therefore, the proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. 13 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 Mitigation Measures Since the proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, no mitigation is required. Conclusion Based upon the historical documentation and information herein presented, the Property is not historically and/or architecturally significant under local, state, and national significance criteria. Therefore, the proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or need anything further. Sincerely, ,./..Z4(.~~ Scott A. Moomjian Attorney at Law 14 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 ATTACHMENT 1 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BUILDING RECORDS Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 . County of San Diego Building Records -Unit 1 -Page l of 2 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RECORD PAPCt l ACOR HS jl (, f/'7 ~':::.'."'·'"° :;;;..;;;;;;;:::;:;;::;;:;;:;;:;:;.;::;;;;;;;;;;;;.;;;;_;;;;;;~ --. . -. - -----, ---··-- ~-·~· ;;;:;;--~oi v-lvj f,.,. ------. -.----+-----,----t--: ------ - -·-·- t,r,, a,..-i\! ~~;~ C1111 ~;-:: r.011 t!,\: Con g;;; 1~ g;;i to,, ~;:; Coit COMPUT ATl0tf . ----'-----,,--------,.------- J.. ____ ,-'.'.:.!'.E...~ '"',.J,..J.1'~,--------+---+---·------t-· --· ---+----+---- (; t P,r.,/1 . Pl.&,_$ .!':'~.J:;? 1-------· -----~---,---------·--~ -~ ---- [,.-l,~c; Pi,:.,/; _ _:2..~~ ·---------------------,-.--1----1 ---·----,-.-----------c ---t----+----1--------..... ------- --------r---1----·~ -· ------------. ------->- -----+----!-----+--+--- __ _,_ __ L. ---------· -·--------·- - -· ---- - -------i ______ ,_.___ -i-------------·1---.---+--+-----i --+----f------- ---· -------~ ---------·· ---•!--- ___ -------------------t-. -----w-----+---t-- --"'---'---➔--..,__ ______ -----··----- lOT_l'J:__-!-~/.c.:'l....:'lc...·~'-'/,'---t-------·-_______ ---·+-------f--------+-- MlO',V\l. , GOOD ll ::.Hl 0 Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 -Count)' of San Diego Building Records -Unit 1 -Page 2 of 2 MISCLLI ANr OU~ ST~UC ( lJf-41:.$ ;~-----CO~UtATt_O_tl_f. _____ _,_ , , -~~ • ·7 \' ·'-· l..\l .. ( :;rltuCTVIIL~ ~1.:1. ~-;~ :_______ :.-,:-;; ~---;..~----,-----•·-----+---+--- ,:. --·. (. 0'----=---. c·,. ---~~~ ----C: ------. ' ;:.;:~~": =--,~-------.-.:.~~ ~ ·-~.--~-------. --------1--·-·-· l-----+-- 1---... ----_.., -, ... ----·-· ----. ·-..... -· ~--· ---. ---'--·--·· i. ··----- 1 Ill VAIi-.:~. I .. . j ... ----· ---·--·· ' ........ ---------·--•----· -------- --------------- L------... , .... /, __ _ ' I - . .... •-· ...... •-·-·· -----·--·-------- i" ·----------------·-·• -·--·•-------" ------- ' r --------.. r-·-----·--------·----.. ----------·-------·-·------- 1-·-·" ·------..... ~-.. ·-··---·--·· ----------·-······· r··-- l--------···· I ' ----------·-· ------------·----------------- Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 -County of San Diego Building Records - U nit 1 -Page 1 ot' 2 ,;c--crv AMU=:1,ort , 'qAr, 01,1,.G~.1. co tAI ,r o ANIA ,..1..v 11~11 • RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RECORD :Ji..f;l"t ef,A~F115Jt..O -!.~-.:;,---_ Aooness St-lEET _L or __j_ -· ~H£tl5 D• ~~ i,'_ r, .., ----l ---- Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 -Coun ty of San Diego Building Records -Unit 1 -Page 2 of 2 ;, '•••·' I .... ...-. -~-.. -........ -----.,. ~------.. •-... ,;r • -· ~ SO~OCE ~--➔--.:..1 •c,uc,:\1 ~.!~!1_SelH Cor.d1hon, Ov,e:. S..1111 o_..!i_ __ QI lO UKk S\.~ &\JV 0, tt --+---4- ,--.. -... . .. ----•· ____ ., ________ _ r ---·--------- L ------------•• _ __ _, .......... ------.. ____ _ . ----------'.-------------·------·" ------ (" ..... -----r-------------------------------------· --------!------·-----( ·------· ..... _ ...... 1--. -----·------------------- !--·--·. ·····-·----·----·-----.. .. --·------------------- ' ~------· ·-·--------· ______ .., _____ -·--·----·---- ' j----· -·--·------· -----------·-·--· ·--·-· -------------------r--·---.. ---.. :.~~~:_· --------- --------·---- t . -~-.. ---·---··· t _______ .. -------· --------·----- Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 ATTACHMENT 2 NOTICE OF COMPLETION Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 11•C011D•N• n•uano IIY TITLE tNSlJRANCE & TRUST I • 905 1582 JUN ~ 7 AM IQ: 52 r CALIPORNtA FtllST BANK 7 I _yu-ii _I._'.:.' ~ -CONSTRUCTION LOAN DEPT, ~U.-,Jf,,:.~.,,~~ m 8155 MEllCUll'i COURT RF .,,,-=-SAN DIIIGO, CA 92111 MQ.. =-· L ATTN: DONNA WARDLOW _JLF 1 __________________ .,.ACS AIIOVa THI• UNa l'OII ••C011D1111'9 UN--- v . TOIH'fCIAtl,7a) Notice ot Completion ...... _ ........ 11111....., ..... _ ...... __ ..._ A,l'.~-N/-41,,/~ Nodoe la b--, pvu lbau 1. 'l1ie .....,,_ II -of die I...,_ or llllto IIAlld Wow Ill die 111J1Nm .........,.__ru-- . : . I ~, ~- 2. '111111111 aw of t111 uad...,....11 JphJI B, McGrath and Jo■tpb" M; Vlgil~·M, , s. 1111 fall ..W-of t11o .... ,.,..., 11 2685 Garfield. Cad1bad. cl 92008 .. ,,. -:-..:!t.'t ~-:~..::.1::...-.. -.... -------------.. -... -.... --.-.-.. ---.-.. --- s. '1111 full -... fall ..W-of .U ,.-. If 11111, who hold Ilda whll tlll ......_ • Jalal...,. ar ..... 111-1111 IIAIID 0 6. '1111 -of Phe p.,._,. la illtfflll of dlo IIINlerllptd, If die proplfl1 w• .,....,..._ ......_. to dll _, of die worts of lmpro,_t liaNln Nfand to: IIAIIU ADD& ... (II .. Ulall• .... ·-.._ .. ,, 7, A worts of lmprov_, on dll proplll)' '-IDllt,r dllOrlbed w• -plal Oil May 28, 1982 8. The 11w of the oonllolGlor, If 1111y, for auoh work of lmpr_, wu Waatward Cpn1truction1 Inc, m .. -,.wo.11,1i.,.._ •• ..w.,i-•-·.1 9. 11ie properly on which .aid work of lmprov1111an1 wu aompl.coil 11 In the City 0,1-_______ _ PARCEL 1: LOT fiXum"ettdfitei"ffmt NO. 2. tN lfffffl 0Affl!'crr''tmrs1r,r1~ar: SAN pif.Cp. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF Ro. 2031, tit!b 1N THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECQRDBll OP BAN DIEGO COUNTY. JUNE 18, 1927 ANIS l!tNC NbKt PARTICUURLY DESCRIBJI) IN A'ffACHED EXHIBIT "A" CONSISTING of ON! PAGE ..... 10. The 111ee1 ..W-of llid propeny II 2685, 2687. 2689 Qvfiilld St, 1 Carl1bad I CA 92008 m .. _..._...,..._.....u,.......,._.._ .. ,, 11paa ... , Datecl: Al1,-1 -t. (, t t ,t ,-= •~~:::::::..:~..:.;..:L.~~.:.....-..,,.,..,.;_, J HN STATI or CALIJOINIA, COlllffY or. SI /I 0 • / ,, '1111 udsnlpad, W■t thly awora, MJII '111M .....i. II tit, .__. of die 11...W ...._ • ..... la die......, ~ .... , ................................. -. .................................. .. ........... 11'1 .... IUIICUIID AND IWOIN 10 W.. • ....... .. r::= •• • _ __.44_,4:~"'--■•:.1411-. .. t.ts..al..icii:.;.' ---, I ,. , , 'tl ;iae:t11s-:t I :.. "] ), ,...11 ........... ...................... ~:;a::;__ ........... ______ _ --.,,._ .... __ _ re· OPltlCJAL II.AL KAY 'CHIIIITIANSEN IIOTMV ,t/111,IC • ' ',,ollNIA SAIi DI. CG11HYY .. -. .. #1111,INI CNa_ ................... ..... t'/ i !! (ti l· :s , . -~ ··---~ Exhibit 2 ITEM #1 '· ' i\ ' .. t, 6 ~ r. . . · · (). · ·····~-:-: :--:l}oa--l.~) -·,······~·~•····· .. --.-····---· .. · ... · " .· •. __.I.a-- IIRUlT 1111.11 IHE LAND REFERKED TO HEREIN IS.SITUATED I~ THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF $AN DIEGO• AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLO"S: PARCEL 1: LOT •d6 OF GRANVILLE PAR~ NO• Zt IN THE tlTY OF CARLSdADt COUNTY OF SAN OtfGO• STATE OF tALIFOR~lA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 2031, FILED IN THE OFfltE OF COU~TY REtDR~ER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 18, l9Zl• PARtEL zr AN EASEl'i~T A~U RIGHT UF WAY FOR THE INSTALLATION• OPERATION, ~AlNTE~ANtE• REP~lA ANO REPLACEHE~T OF A SENER PIPELINE AND APPuRTE~ANCES THE~ETOt OVER, UNOEMt ALONG AND ACROSS THE NORT~WESTERLY J.oo FEET OF L~T es OF . GRAN:JILLE PA~K ~o. Z, IN THE CITY OF tULSIUDt COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE. OF CAllfOP.~IAt ACCuAOING TD HAP THEREOF NO• ZOllt FILEU IN THE.OFFICE oi: <OU~TY RECOROfK 0~ SAN DlEGO COUNTY, JuNE 18, 19Zle PARCEL 3: I.OT 87 Of GRANVILLE PAl\k NUe l,. ·IN ·rH'& CITY OF CARLSBAD, COU~Tf OF SA~ DJ~C.O• STATE OF CALIFOI\NIAt ACCORDING TO ~AP THEREOF NO. 2~37, FILED IN THE OfFltE UF COUNTY AEtORDER OF SAN DlEG? COU~TY, JUNE 18• 1927• PUCEL 1ti AN IEAUMEtH A'lU RIGHT tJF WAY OVER THE NDRTHWESTEIU.Y ' LIZ FEET OF LOT 8ft OF SAIO &RANVILLE PARK ND• Z FOR INSTALLATIO~ AND MAINTENANCE OF SE~E~ A~O ~ATER PIPE Ll~,s. STATI or CAU,ORNJA } COUNTY or san Diego ss. , n, May 14, 1982 w, .. -llie undmlantd, a No1111 PuliUo I~ ... for llld C-i,, 111d 81.,ie, -•llr 1p)IIINCI John 11 Hanrath ------------known lo 1111 10 be Iha po-. ...:.:....whON n■....J!.~ubecrlbod 10 1h1 wllhln lnllt11-l 1nd acknowlldpd 1h11 he t11C•lld Ille 111110. 1/1 ~L:U,o • .LffeA DIANE SUTERA, Notary • ·--------lli-iii'111•-·- POii NOTAIIY ■UL. OIi ■TAMP 8 OPPlCIAL SEAL DIANE SUTERA NOTAAY PUii.iC • CAlt,ORNIA SAN DIEIIG COUIIT'I My com111. 11pl111 IUl 2, 11182 , r l .. ---------------~'-----...:""'::::•:":.:"'::•:111:11:--::"~--=------J ,__..____ ------, .. .;.z'lj7·2··;;··-·.~... -· .. ,. ,.-, :.. . ..:.,.m;11 I I I , \ -'!--... ., !I I :