HomeMy WebLinkAboutRP 92-10A; BLUE WATER GRILL CARLSBAD; PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (PDP) STORM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWQMP); 2016-05-25CITY OF CARLSBAD
PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (PDP)
STORM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWQMP)
FOR
BWG CARLSBAD
PROJECT ID: RP 92-10(A) I CDP 92-08(A)
DRAWING No. DWG 492-4A
SWQMP No. SWMPI6-08
ENGINEER OF WORK:
JOHN CRUIKSHANK, C50792
Exp -30-17
50792
IVI
OF c
PREPARED FOR:
BLUEWATER GRILL
630 LIDO PARK DRIVE
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663
PREPARED BY:
JMCA2
411 N. HARBOR BLVD., STE. 201
SAN PEDRO, CA 90731
310-241-6550
DATE:
MAY 25, 2016
RECEIVED
JUL 20 2016
LAND DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING
'12.-!O4
CERTIFICATION PAGE
Project Name: BWG CARLSBAD
Project ID: RP 92-10(A)1CDP 92-08(A)
I hereby declare that I am the Engineer in Responsible Charge of design of storm water BMPs
for this project, and that I have exercised responsible charge over the design of the project as
defined in Section 6703 of the Business and Professions Code, and that the design is consistent
with the requirements of the BMP Design Manual, which is based on the requirements of
SDRWQCB Order No. R9-2013-0001 (MS4 Permit) or the current Order.
I have read and understand that the City Engineer has adopted minimum requirements for
managing urban runoff, including storm water, from land development activities, as described in
the BMP Design Manual. I certify that this SWQMP has been completed to the best of my ability
and accurately reflects the project being proposed and the applicable source control and site
design BMPs proposed to minimize the potentially negative impacts of this project's land
development activities on water quality. I understand and acknowledge that the plan check
review of this SWQMP by the City Engineer is confined to a review and does not relieve me, as
the Engineer in Responsible Charge of design of storm water BMPs for this project, of my
responsibilities for project design.
Enger of Work's Signature, PE Number & Expiration
JOHN CRUIKSHANK
Print Name
JMCA2
Company
05/25/16
Date
ps*41
NOT TO SCALE
SITE MAP
Bluewater Grill
RP 92-10(A) / CDP 92-08(A)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Certification Page
Project Vicinity Map
FORM E-34 Storm Water Standard Questionnaire
Site Information
FORM E-36 Standard Project Requirement Checklist
Summary of POP Structural BMPs
Attachment 1: Backup for POP Pollutant Control BMPs
Attachment Ia: DMA Exhibit
Attachment I b: Tabular Summary of OMAs and Design Capture Volume Calculations
Attachment 1c: Harvest and Use Feasibility Screening (when applicable)
Attachment Id: Categorization of Infiltration Feasibility Condition (when applicable)
Attachment le: Pollutant Control BMP Design Worksheets I Calculations
Attachment 2: Backup for PDP Hydromodification Control Measures
Attachment 2a: Hydromodification Management Exhibit
Attachment 2b: Management of Critical Coarse Sediment Yield Areas
Attachment 2c: Geomorphic Assessment of Receiving Channels
Attachment 2d: Flow Control Facility Design
Attachment 3: Structural BMP Maintenance Thresholds and Actions
Attachment 4: Single Sheet BMP (SSBMP) Exhibit
STORM WATER STANDARDS Development Services (City of
Carlsbad QUESTIONNAIRE Land Development Engineering
1635 Faraday Avenue
E-34 (760) 602-2750
www.carlsbadca.gov
INSTRUCTIONS:
To address post-development pollutants that may be generated from development projects, the city requires that new
development and significant redevelopment priority projects incorporate Permanent Storm Water Best Management
Practices (BMPs) into the project design per Carlsbad BMP Design Manual (BMP Manual). To view the BMP Manual,
refer to the Engineering Standards (Volume 5).
This questionnaire must be completed by the applicant in advance of submitting for a development application
(subdivision, discretionary permits and/or construction permits). The results of the questionnaire determine the level of
storm water standards that must be applied to a proposed development or redevelopment project. Depending on the
outcome, your project will either be subject to 'STANDARD PROJECT' requirements or be subject to PRIORITY
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT' (PDP) requirements.
Your responses to the questionnaire represent an initial assessment of the proposed project conditions and impacts. City
staff has responsibility for making the final assessment after submission of the development application. If staff
determines that the questionnaire was incorrectly filled out and is subject to more stringent storm water standards than
initially assessed by you, this will result in the return of the development application as incomplete. In this case, please
make the changes to the questionnaire and resubmit to the city.
If you are unsure about the meaning of a question or need help in determining how to respond to one or more of the
questions, please seek assistance from Land Development Engineering staff.
A completed and signed questionnaire must be submitted with each development project application. Only one
completed and signed questionnaire is required when multiple development applications for the same project are
submitted concurrently.
PROJECT INFORMATION
PROJECT NAME: BWG CARLSBAD PROJECT ID: RP 92-10(A)ICDP 92-08(A)
ADDRESS: 417 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE APN: 203-296-07-00
The project is (check one): 0 New Development J Redevelopment
The total proposed disturbed area is: 8,885 2 (0.204__) acres
The total proposed newly created and/or replaced impervious area is: 8,755 2 (0.201 ) acres
If your project is covered by an approved SWQMP as part of a larger development project, provide the project ID and the
SWQMP # of the larger development project:
Project ID SWQMP#:
Then, go to Step I and follow the instructions. When completed, sign the form at the end and submit this with your
application to the city.
E-34 Page 1 of 4 REV 02/16
STEP I
TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL PROJECTS
To determine if your project is a "development project", please answer the following question:
YES NO
Is your project LIMITED TO routine maintenance activity and/or repair/improvements to an existing building
or structure that do not alter the size (See Section 1.3 of the BMP Design Manual for guidance)?
If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide justification below then go to Step 5, mark the third box stating "my
project is not a 'development project' and not subject to the requirements of the BMP manual" and complete applicant
information.
Justification/discussion: (e.g. the project includes only interior remodels within an existing building):
If you answered "no" to the above question, the project is a 'development project', go to Step 2.
STEP 2
TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
To determine if your project is exempt from PDP requirements pursuant to MS4 Permit Provision E.3.b.(3), please answer
the following questions:
Is your project LIMITED to one or more of the following:
YES NO
1. Constructing new or retrofitting paved sidewalks, bicycle lanes or trails that meet the following criteria:
Designed and constructed to direct storm water runoff to adjacent vegetated areas, or other non-
erodible permeable areas; El 0 Designed and constructed to be hydraulically disconnected from paved streets or roads;
Designed and constructed with permeable pavements or surfaces in accordance with USEPA
Green Streets guidance?
2. Retrofitting or redeveloping existing paved alleys, streets, or roads that are designed and constructed in
accordance with the USEPA Green Streets guidance?
3. Ground Mounted Solar Array that meets the criteria provided in section 1.4.2 of the BMP manual?
If you answered "yes" to one or more of the above questions, provide discussion/justification below, then go to Step 5, mark
the second box stating "my project is EXEMPT from PDP . .." and complete applicant information.
Discussion to justify exemption ( e.g. the project redeveloping existing road designed and constructed in accordance with
the USEPA Green Street guidance):
If you answered "no" to the above questions, your project is not exempt from PDP, go to Step 3.
E-34 Page 2of4 REV 02/16
STEP 3
TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL NEW OR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
To determine if your project is a POP, please answer the following questions (MS4 Permit Provision E.3.b.(1)):
YES NO
Is your project a new development that creates 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surfaces
collectively over the entire project site? This includes commercial, industrial, residential, mixed-use, U IJ
and public development projects on public or private land.
Is your project a redevelopment project creating and/or replacing .5,000 square feet or more of
impervious surface collectively over the entire project site on an existing site of 10,000 square feet or 0 El more of impervious surface? This includes commercial, industrial, residential, mixed-use, and public
development projects on public or private land.
Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more
of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a restaurant? A restaurant is
a facility that sells prepared foods and drinks for consumption, including stationary lunch counters and LZ 0
refreshment stands selling prepared foods and drinks for immediate consumption (Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) code 5812).
Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates 5,000 square feet or more of impervious
surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a hillside development project? A hillside 0 ZI
development project includes development on any natural slope that is twenty-five percent or greater.
Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more
of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a parking lot? A parking lot is
a land area or facility for the temporary parking or storage of motor vehicles used personally for
business or for commerce.
Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more
of impervious surface collectively over the entire project site and supports a street, road, highway 0 El freeway or driveway? A street, mad, highway, freeway or driveway is any paved impervious surface
used for the transportation of automobiles, trucks, motorcycles, and other vehicles.
Is your project a new or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 2,500 square feet or more
of impervious surface collectively over the entire site, and discharges directly to an Environmentally
Sensitive Area (ESA)? "Discharging Directly to" includes flow that is conveyed overland a distance of 0 II
200 feet or less from the project to the ESA, or conveyed in a pipe or open channel any distance as an
isolated flow from the project to the ESA (i.e. not commingled with flows from adjacent lands).*
Is your project a new development or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square
feet or more of impervious surface that supports an automotive repair shop? An automotive repair
shop is a facility that is categorized in any one of the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
codes: 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532-7534, or 7536-7539.
Is your project a new development or redevelopment project that creates and/or replaces 5,000 square
feet or more of impervious area that supports a retail gasoline outlet (RGO)? This category includes El 0 RGO's that meet the following criteria: (a) 5,000 square feet or more or (b) a project Average Daily
Traffic (ADT) of 100 or more vehicles per day.
Is your project a new or redevelopment project that results in the disturbance of one or more acres of land El 0 and are expected to generate pollutants post construction?
Is your project located within 200 feet of the Pacific Ocean and (1) creates 2,500 square feet or more of
impervious surface or (2) increases impervious surface on the property by more than 10%? (CMC 0 I1
21.203.040)
If you answered 'yes" to one or more of the above questions, your project is a PDP. If your project is a redevelopment
project, go to step 4. If your project is a new project, go to step 5, check the first box stating "My project is a PDP ..."
and complete applicant information.
If you answered "no" to all of the above questions, your project is a 'STANDARD PROJECT.' Go to step 5, check the
second box stating "My project is a 'STANDARD PROJECT'..." and complete applicant information.
E-34 Page 3of4 REV 02/16
SITE INFORMATION CHECKLIST
Project Summary Information
Project Name BWG CARLSBAD
Project ID RP 92-1O(A)ICDP 92-08(A)
Project Address 417 CARLSBAD VILLAGE
Assessors Parcel Number(s) (APN(s)) 20329607-00
Project Watershed (Hydrologic Unit) Carlsbad 904
Parcel Area
0.298 _Acres (_ 12.994 Square Feet)
Existing Impervious Area
(subset of Parcel Area) Acres ( 0.285 12,407 -_- Square Feet)
Area to be disturbed by the project
(Project Area) 0.204 Acres L8885 - - _____
Square Feet)
Project Proposed Impervious Area
(subset of Project Area) _0.201_- Acres L8.755 Square Feet)
Project Proposed Pervious Area
(subset of Project Area) _0.003_- Acres C 13 Square Feet)
Note: Proposed Impervious Area + Proposed Pervious Area = Area to be Disturbed by the
Project.
This may be less than the Parcel Area.
Description of Existing Site Condition and Drainage Patterns
Current Status of the Site (select all that apply):
X Existing development
Previously graded but not built out
Agricultural or other non-impervious use
Vacant, undeveloped/natural
Description / Additional Information:
Existing Land Cover Includes (select all that apply):
X Vegetative Cover
X Non-Vegetated Pervious Areas
X Impervious Areas
Description / Additional Information:
Underlying Soil belongs to Hydrologic Soil Group (select all that apply):
DNRCS Type A
NRCS Type B
ONRCS Type C
ONRCS Type D
Approximate Depth to Groundwater (GW):
GW Depth < 5 feet
0 5 feet < GW Depth < 10 feet
X 10 feet < GW Depth < 20 feet
GW Depth > 20 feet
Existing Natural Hydrologic Features (select all that apply):
Watercourses
Seeps
Springs
Wetlands
It None
Description /Additional Information:
Description of Existing Site Topography and Drainage [How is storm water runoff conveyed from
the site? At a minimum, this description should answer (1) whether existing drainage
conveyance is natural or urban; (2) describe existing constructed storm water conveyance
systems, if applicable; and (3) is runoff from offsite conveyed through the site? if so, describe]:
OVERALL, THE PROJECT SITE IS RELATIVELY FLAT HAVING A MAXIMUM 1-2% GRADE
FROM THE EXISTING STRUCTURE TO THE PARKING AREA TO THE SOUTH. THE SITE
CONSISTS PRIMARILY OF URBAN HARDSCAPE FEATURES DRAINING TOWARDS AN
EXISTING CONCRETE SWALE CONVEYING SITE STORMWATER EAST TO A LARGE
CATCH BASIN AT THE FAR EAST END OF THE CITY PARKING AREA.
Description of Proposed Site Development and Drainage Patterns
Project Description / Proposed Land Use and/or Activities:
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT INCLUDES THE ADDITION OF 2,049 SF OF INTERIOR
RESTUARANT SPACE AND 1,202 SF OUTDOOR DINING AREA ALONG WITH IMPROVED
WALKWAY/ADA ACCESS AND SITE DRAINAGE. OVERALL SITE DRAINAGE
CONVEYANCE WILL REMAIN THE SAME IN BOTH THE PRE- AND POST-
CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS.
List/describe proposed impervious features of the project (e.g., buildings, roadways, parking
lots, courtyards, athletic courts, other impervious features):
NEW PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SITE FEATURES INCLUDE THE ADDITION OF 2,049 SF
OF INTERIOR RESTUARANT SPACE, A 1,202 SF OUTDOOR DINING AREA, AND THE
REPLACEMENT OF ADJACENT WALKWAYS AND PARKING AREAS FOR IMPROVED
ADA ACCESS AND DRAINAGE.
List/describe proposed pervious features of the project (e.g., landscape areas):
NEW PROPOSED PERVIOUS SITE FEATURES INCLUDE TWO 16 SF TREE WELLS IN
THE NEW OUTDOOR DINING AREA AS WELL AS THE REPLACEMENT OF THE PLANTER
BOXES ALONG THE EXISTING RESTAURANT ENTRANCE AND THE ADDITION OF A
PLANTER BOX ALONG THE NEW OUTDOOR DINING AREA.
Does the project include grading and changes to site topography?
X Yes
ONo
Description /Additional Information:
GRADING IMPROVEMENTS ARE DESIGNED TO BRING THE SITE UP TO CODE BY
PROVIDING ADA ACCESS AS WELL AS IMPROVED DRAINAGE CONSISTING OF A 2%
SLOPE AWAY FROM THE BUILDING FOR THE FIRST 10' AND AN OVERALL 1-2%
REMAINING SLOPE FROM THE PARKING AREA TO THE EXISTING CONCRETE SWALE.
OVERALL SITE DRAINAGE CONVEYANCE WILL REMAIN THE SAME IN BOTH THE PRE-
AND POST- CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS.
Does the project include changes to site drainage (e.g., installation of new storm water
conveyance systems)?
X Yes
0 N
Description / Additional Information:
ATTACHMENT 4
City standard Single Sheet BMP (SSBMP) Exhibit
BMP Inspection/Maintenance S
Reponsible Inspection! Maintenance Minimum Frequency of
BMP Party(s) Activities Required Activities
MAINTENANCE INDICATOR
ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT, LITTER, OR DEBRIS; STANDING
WATER IN TREE-WELLS FOR LONGER THAN 96 HOURS
FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT
TREE WELL (SD-1) OWNER MAINTENANCE ACTION
MAKE APPROPRIATE CORRECTIVE MEASURES SUCH AS
INSPECTING / UNCLOGGING ORIFICE OPENING, ADJUSTING
IRRIGATION SYSTEM, REMOVING OBSTRUCTIONS OF DEBRIS OR
INVASIVE VEGETATION, CLEARING UNDERDRAINS (WHERE
APPLICABLE), OR REPAIRING / REPLACING CLOGGED OR
COMPACTED SOILS.
MAINTENANCE INDICATOR
ACCUMULATION OF SEDIMENT, LITTER, OR DEBRIS IN ERAIN INFILTRATION BASIN AND PRE-TREATMENT DEVICE AT CATCH INFILTRATION OWNER BASIN TANK (INF-1)
MAINTENANCE ACTION
REMOVE AND PROPERLY DISPOSE ACCUMULATED MATERIALS.
MAINTENANCE INDICATOR
STANDING WATER IN SUBSURFACE INFILTRATION GALLERY FOR
LONGER THAN 96 HOURS FOLLOWING A STORM EVENT
MAINTENANCE ACTION
ON 'WNER THIS CONDITION REQUIRES INVESTIGATION OF WHY [ECORAIN
INFILTRATION IS NOT OCCURRING. IF FEASIBLE, CORRECTIVE ) ACTION SHALL BE TAKEN TO RESTORE INFILTRATION (E.G.
FLUSH FINE SEDIMENT OR REMOVE AND REPLACE CLOGGED
SOILS). BMP MAY REQUIRE RETROFIT IF INFILTRATION CANNOT
BE RESTORED. IF RETROFIT IS NECESSARY, THE CITY ENGINEER
SHALL BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO ANY REPAIRS OR
RECONSTRUCTION.
ATTACHMENT 3
Structural BMP Maintenance Information
ATTACHMENT 2
BACKUP FOR POP HYDROMODIFICATION CONTROL MEASURES
Indicate which Items are Included behind this cover sheet:
Attachment Contents Checklist
Sequence
Attachment 2a Hydromodification Management 0 Included
Exhibit (Required)
See Hydromodification Management
Exhibit Checklist on the back of this
Attachment cover sheet.
Attachment 2b Management of Critical Coarse 0 Exhibit showing project drainage
Sediment Yield Areas (WMAA Exhibit boundaries marked on WMAA
is required, additional analyses are Critical Coarse Sediment Yield
optional) Area Map (Required)
See Section 6.2 of the BMP Design Optional analyses for Critical Coarse
Manual. Sediment Yield Area Determination
6.2.1 Verification of Geomorphic
Landscape Units Onsite
6.2.2 Downstream Systems
/ Sensitivity to Coarse Sediment
6.2.3 Optional Additional Analysis
of Potential Critical Coarse
Sediment Yield Areas Onsite
Attachment 2c Geomorphic Assessment of Receiving x Not performed
Channels (Optional) Included
See Section 6.3.4 of the BMP Design
Manual.
Attachment 2d Flow Control Facility Design and 0 Included
Structural BMP Drawdown
Calculations (Required)
See Chapter 6 and Appendix G of the
BMP Design Manual
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
Iteratively determine the surface ponding required to provide infiltration storage to reduce
flow rates and durations to allowable limits while adhering to the maximum 36-hour
drawdown time. Flow rates and durations can be controlled using flow splitters that route the
appropriate inflow amounts to the infiltration basin and bypass excess flows to the
downstream storm drain system or discharge point.
If an infiltration basin cannot fully provide the flow rate and duration control required by this
manual, an upstream or downstream structure with appropriate storage volume such as an
underground vault can be used to provide additional control.
After the infiltration basin has been designed to meet flow control requirements, calculations
must be completed to verify if storm water pollutant control requirements to treat the DCV
have been met.
E-39 February 2016
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
Slung and Design Intent/Rationale
Inflow and outflow structures are
accessible by required equipment (e.g., Maintenance will prevent dogging and ensure
vac tor truck) for inspection and proper operation of the flow control
i structures. maintenance.
Inflow velocities are limited to 3 ft/s or
less or use energy dissipation methods High inflow velocities can cause erosion, scour
0 (e.g., riprap, level spreader) for and/or channeling.
concentrated inflows.
Overflow is safely conveyed to a
downstream storm drain system or
discharge point. Size overflow structure
to pass 100-year peak flow for on-line
basins and water quality peak flow for
off-line basins.
Planning for overflow lessens the risk of
property damage due to flooding.
fceptuai Design and Sizing Approach for Storm Wafer Pollutant Control - -
To design infiltration basins for storm water pollutant control only (no flow control required), the
following steps should be taken:
Verify that siting and design criteria have been met, including placement and basin area
requirements, forebay volume, and maximum slopes for basin sides and bottom.
Calculate the DCV per Appendix B based on expected site design runoff for tributary areas.
Use the sizing worksheet (Appendix B.4) to determine if full infiltration of the DCV is
achievable based on the infiltration storage volume calculated from the surface ponding area
and depth for a maximum 36-hour drawdown time. The drawdown time can be estimated by
dividing the average depth of the basin by the design infiltration rate. Appendix D provides
guidance on evaluating a site's infiltration rate.
(Conceptual Design and Sizing Approach for Storm Water Pollutant Treatment and Flow Control T
Control of flow rates and/or durations will typically require significant surface ponding volume, and
therefore the following steps should be taken prior to determination of storm water pollutant control
design. Pre-development and allowable post-project flow rates and durations should be determined as
discussed in Chapter 6 of the manual.
1. Verify that siting and design criteria have been met, including placement and basin area
requirements, forebay volume, and maximum slopes for basin sides and bottom.
E-38 February 2016
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
also be designed for flow rate and duration control by providing additional infiltration storage through
increasing the surface ponding volume.
rDesign Criteria and Considerations 1
Infiltration basins must meet the following design criteria. Deviations from the below criteria may be
approved at the discretion of the City Engineer if it is determined to be appropriate:
Siting and Design Intent/Rationale
Placement observes geotechnical
recommendations regarding potential Must not negatively impact existing site D hazards (e.g., slope stability, landslides, geotechnical concerns. liquefaction zones) and setbacks (e.g.,
slopes, foundations, utilities).
Selection and design of basin is based Must operate as a full infiltration design and
0 on infiltration feasibility criteria and must be supported by drainage area and in-situ appropriate design infiltration rate (See infiltration rate feasibility findings. Appendix C and D).
Finish grade of the facility is S 2% (0% Flatter surfaces reduce erosion and 0 recommended). channelization with the facility.
Settling forebay has a volume? 25% of A forebay to trap sediment can decrease facility volume below the forebay frequency of required maintenance. overflow.
Prolonged surface ponding reduce volume
available to capture subsequent storms.
0 Infiltration of surface ponding is limited The applicant has an option to use a different
to a 36-hour drawdown time. drawdown time up to 96 hours if the volume
of the facility is adjusted using the percent
capture method in Appendix B.4.2.
Minimum freeboard provided is ~!1 Freeboard minimizes risk of uncontrolled 0 foot. surface discharge.
Gentler side slopes are safer, less prone to
E] Side slopes are = 3H:1V or shallower, erosion, able to establish vegetation more
quickly and easier to maintain.
Inflow and Overflow Structures
E-37 February 2016
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
MAINTENANCE ACCESS
OVERFLOW STRUCTURE
Al
SLOPE________
31 MAX.
SIDE
RIPRAP FOR ENERGY ' BERM '. VEGETATED SIDE OVERALL BASIN:
DISSIPATION SLOPES AND BOTTOM L:W RATIO 2: 2:1
MIN. 2% OF MAINTENANCE ACCESS TRIBUTARY AREA
PLAN
NOT TO SCALE
BERM
/ r MIN. 1 FREEBOARD
MAINTENANCE ACCESS -
MAINTENANCE I I OVERFLOW STRUCTURE
ACCESS I I RIPRAP I I SURFACE L--------JJ [POING
INFLOW PIPE—' "Y).W..Ys \?Y'%' .'Y?w%w%v" ' 'Y1Y U
EXISTING IJNCOMPACTED OUTLET PIPE
PERVIOUS SOILS
SECTION A-A'
NOT TO SCALE
Typical plan and section view of an Infiltration BMP
Design Adaptations for Project Goals
Full infiltration BMP for storm water pollutant control. Infiltration basins can be used as a
pollutant control BMP, designed to infiltrate runoff from direct rainfall as well as runoff from adjacent
areas that are tributary to the BMP. Infiltration basins must be designed with an infiltration storage
volume (a function of the surface ponding volume) equal to the full DCV and able to meet drawdown
time limitations.
Integrated storm water flow control and pollutant control configuration. Infiltration basins can
E-36 February 2016
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
E.8 INF-1 Infiltration Basin
MS4 Permit Category
Retention
Manual Category
Infiltration
Applicable Performance
Standard
Pollutant Control
Flow Control
Primary Benefits
Volume Reduction
Peak Flow Attenuation
Photo Credit: http://www.stormwaterpan'ners. com/facilities/basin.html
Description
An infiltration basin typically consists of an earthen basin with a flat bottom constructed in naturally
pervious soils. An infiltration basin retains storm water and allows it to evaporate and/or percolate
into the underlying soils. The bottom of an infiltration basin is typically vegetated with native grasses
or turf grass; however other types of vegetation can be used if they can survive periodic inundation
and long inter-event dry periods. Treatment is achieved primarily through infiltration, filtration,
sedimentation, biochemical processes and plant uptake. Infiltration basins can be constructed as linear
trenches or as underground infiltration galleries.
Typical infiltration basin components include:
Inflow distribution mechanisms (e.g., perimeter flow spreader or filter strips)
Energy dissipation mechanism for concentrated inflows (e.g., splash blocks or riprap)
Forebay to provide pretreatment surface pondirig for captured flows
Vegetation selected based on basin use, climate, and ponding depth
Lncompacted native soils at the bottom of the facility
Overflow structure
E-35 February 2016
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
Evapotranspiration credit of 0.1 * amount of soil volume installed; and
Infiltration credit calculated using sizing procedures in Appendix B.4.
E-20 February 2016
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
Siting and Design Intent/Rationale
must be reduced proportionately to the
actual tributary area.
-
Design requirement to ensure that the
Inlet opening to the tree that is at least 18 runoff from the tributary area is not
inches wide. bypassed.
Different inlet openings and drops in
grade may be allowed at the discretion of
A minimum 2 inch drop in grade from the inlet the City Engineer if calculations are
to the finish grade of the tree. shown that the diversion flow rate
Grated inlets are allowed for pedestrian
circulation. Grates need to be ADA compliant
and have sufficient slip resistance.
(Appendix B.1.2) from the tributary area
can be conveyed to the tree. In cases
where the inlet capacity is limiting the
amount of runoff draining to the tree,
the tree credit volume must be reduced
proportionately.
[Conceptual Design and Sizing Approach for Site Design 1
Determine the areas where tree wells can be used in the site design to achieve incidental
treatment. Tree wells reduce runoff volumes from the site. Refer to Appendix B.2. Document
the proposed tree locations in the SWQMP.
2. When trees are proposed as a storm water pollutant control BMP, applicant must complete
feasibility analysis in Appendix C and D and submit detailed calculations for the DCV treated
by trees: Document the proposed tree locations, feasibility analysis and sizing calculations in
the SWQMP. The following calculations should be performed and the smallest of the three
should be used as the volume treated by trees:
a. Delineate the DMA (tributary area) to the tree and calculate the associated DCV.
b. Calculate the required diversion flow rate using Appendix B.1.2 and size the inlet
required to covey this flow rate to the tree. If the proposed inlet cannot convey the
diversion flow rate for the entire tributary area, then the DCV that enters the tree
should be proportionally reduced.
For example, 0.5 acre drains to the tree and the associated DCV is 820 ft3. The
required diversion flow rate is 0.10 ft3/s, but only an inlet that can divert 0.05
ft3/s could be installed.
Then the effective DCV draining to the tree = 820 ft3 * (0.05/0.10) = 420 ft3
c. Estimate the amount of storm water treated by the tree by summing the following-
E-19 February 2016
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
Siting and Design Intent/Rationale
• Suspended pavement designs provide
structural support without compaction
Suspended pavement design was developed of the underlying layers, thereby
where appropriate to minimize soil compaction promoting tree growth.
and improve infiltration and filtration Recommended structural cells include U capabilities. poured in place concrete columns, Silva
Suspended pavement was constructed with an Cells manufactured by Deeproot Green
approved structural cell. Infrastructures and Stratacell and
Stratavault systems manufactured by
Citygreen Systems.
The minimum soil volume ensures that
there is adequate storage volume to
allow for unrestricted
A minimum soil volume of 2 cubic feet per evapotranspiration.
square foot of canopy projection volume is A lower amount of soil volume may be
U provided for each tree. Canopy projection area allowed at the discretion of the City
is the ground area beneath the tree, measured Engineer if certified by a landscape
at the drip line, architect or agronomist. The retention
credit from the tree is directly
proportional to the soil volume provided
for the tree.
Establishing Amended Soil regains
greater storm water functions in the tree
wells, provides increased treatment of
Amended soil layer for tress shall be a pollutants and sediments that result from
minimum of three feet deep and extend at least development and habitation, and
twelve inches in all directions of the root ball U minimizes that need for some
when planted. The length and width must landscaping chemicals, thus reducing
ensure the appropriate volume for the species pollution through prevention.
and site. For more details on Amended Soil, refer
to Appendix E in County of San Diego
BMP Design Manual.
The minimum tributary area ensures that
DCV from the tributary area draining to the the tree receives enough runoff to fully
utilize tree is equal to or greater than the tree credit the infiltration and
volume evapotranspiration potential provided. In
cases where the minimum tributary area
is not provided, the tree credit volume
E-18 February 2016
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
Siting and Design Intent/Rationale
Location of trees planted within private
development follows city landscape guidelines.
Building setback, utility alignments, vehicle and
pedestrian line of sight are considered in tree
selection and placement.
Location of trees planted along public streets
follows city requirements and guidelines.
Vehicle and pedestrian line of sight are
considered in tree selection and placement.
Unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer the following minimum, tree
separation distance is suggested:
Roadway safety for both vehicular and
pedestrian traffic is a key consideration
for placement along public streets.
Minimum U Improvement distance to
Tree Well
Traffic Signal, Stop sign 20 feet
Underground Utility lines
(except sewer) 5 feet
Sewer Lines 10 feet
Above ground utility
structures (Transformers, 10 feet
Hydrants, Utility poles, etc.)
Driveways 10 feet
Intersections (intersecting
curb lines of two streets) 25 feet
Underground utilities and overhead wires
are considered in the design and avoided or Tree growth can damage utilities and
circumvented. Underground utilities are routed overhead wires resulting in service
U around or through the planter in suspended interruptions. Protecting utilities routed
pavement applications. All underground through the planter prevents damage and
utilities are protected from water and root service interruptions.
penetration.
E-17 February 2016
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
uses, and project goals
Optional suspended pavement design to provide structural support for adjacent pavement
without requiring compaction of underlying layers
Optional root barrier devices as needed; a root barrier is a device installed in the ground,
between a tree and the sidewalk, intended to guide roots down and away from the sidewalk in
order to prevent sidewalk lifting from tree roots.
Optional tree grates; to be considered to maximize available space for pedestrian circulation
and to protect tree roots from compaction related to pedestrian circulation; tree grates are
typically made up of porous material that will allow the runoff to soak through.
Optional shallow surface depression for ponding of excess runoff
Optional planter box drain
Design Adaptations for Project Goals - - -
Site design BMP to provide incidental treatment. Tree wells primarily functions as site design
BMPs for incidental treatment. Benefits from tree wells are accounted for by adjustment factors
presented in Appendix B.2. Trees as a site design BMP are only credited up to 0.25 times the DCV
from the project footprint (with a maximum single tree credit volume of 400 ft3).
Storm water pollutant control BMP to provide treatment. Applicants are allowed to design trees
as a pollutant control BMP and obtain credit greater than 0.25 times the DCV from the project
footprint (or a credit greater than 400 ft3 from a single tree). For this option to be approved by the
City Engineer, applicant is required to do infiltration feasibility screening (Appendix C and D) and
provide calculations supporting the amount of credit claimed from implementing trees within the
project footprint. The City Engineer has the discretion to request additional analysis before approving
credits greater than 0.25 times the DCV from the project footprint (or a credit greater than 400 ft'
from a single tree).
Design Criteria and Considerations
Tree Wells must meet the following design criteria and considerations. Deviations from the below
criteria may be approved at the discretion of the City Engineer if it is determined to be appropriate:
Siting and Design Intent/Rationale
Tree species is appropriately chosen for the
development (private or public). For public
rights-of-ways, city planning guidelines and Proper tree placement and species
D zoning provisions for the permissible species selection minimizes problems such as
and placement of trees are consulted. A list of pavement damage by surface roots and
trees appropriate for site design are provided in poor growth.
Appendix E.20
E-16 February 2016
Appendix E: BMP Design Fact Sheets
E.2 SD-1 Tree Wells
MS4 Permit Category
Site Design
Manual Category
Site Design
Applicable Performance
Standard
Site Design
Primary Benefits
olume Reduction
Tree Wells (Source: County of San Diego LID Manual - EOA, Inc.)
Description
Trees planted to intercept rainfall and runoff from impervious areas can be used as storm water quality
management measures that provide additional benefits beyond those typically associated with trees,
including energy conservation, air quality improvement, and aesthetic enhancement. Typical storm
water management benefits associated with trees include:
Treatment of storm water - Storm water from impervious area should be directed the tree
wells. Trees provide treatment through uptake of nutrients and other storm water pollutants
(phytoremediation) and support of other biological processes that break down pollutants..
Canopy Interception of rainfall - tree surfaces (roots, foliage, bark, and branches) intercept,
evaporate, store, or convey precipitation to the soil before it reaches surrounding impervious
surfaces
Reduced erosion - trees protect denuded area by intercepting or reducing the velocity of rain
drops as they fall through the tree canopy
Increased infiltration - soil conditions created by roots and fallen leaves promote infiltration
Typical tree well system components include:
Directing runoff from impervious areas through a drainage opening into a tree well planting
area
Trees of the appropriate species for site conditions and constraints
Available growing space based on tree species, soil type, water availability, surrounding land
E-15 February 2016
Appendix B: Storm Water Pollutant Control Hydrologic Calculations and Sizing Methods
Worksheet B.2-1. DCV - 7.v, /.
4' Q"m '(ojfl? ilxgi 1IB
I 85" percentile 24-hr storm depth from Figure B.I-I d= 0 SS inches
2 Area tributary to BMP (s) A= 0 ô S acres
3
Area weighted runoff factor (estimate using Appendix
B.I.I and B.2.I) C , ( unitless
4 Tree wells volume reduction TCV cubic-feet
5 Rain barrels volume reduction RCV - cubic-feet
6
Calculate DCV = 33(O.C)(D.cI) (0. its)
(3630 x C x d x A) - TCV - RCV DCV=
35D.5
cubic-feet
If JBBS 3.f - 911 6 f i$W Ajiv, id JI Q9 : O.iBS ac(eS
B-10 February 2016
Appendix B: Storm Water Pollutant Control Hydrologic Calculations and Sizing Methods
B.4.1 Simple Method - 44y)
Stepwise Instructions:
Compute DCV using Worksheet B.4-1.
Estimate design infiltration rate using Form 1-9 in Appendix I.
Design BMP(s) to ensure that the DCV is fully retained (i.e., no surface discharge during the
design event) and the stored effective depth draws down in no longer than 36 hours.
Worksheet B.4-1: Simple Sizing Method for Infiltration BMPs
1 T
Simple Sizing Method for Infiltration Bmps
I DCV (Worksheet B.2-1) DCV= cubic-feet
2 Estimated design infiltration rate (Form 1-9 in Appendix Kd—
V-'J/3 Available BMP surface area ABMP 23 sq-ft
Average effective depth in the BMP footprint D = feet
- (DCV/ABMP)
5 Drawdown time, T (D *12/}() T= 12. ,2. hours
6 Provide alternative calculation of drawdown time, if needcd.
R% j:IZ.ZS SQ. ecmw\ vmk t' )(2.2S r~A'~Mqi
• ZOO 4601 Z%I2SS+
,c(.4t)
Notes:
Drawdown time must be less than 36 hours. This criterion was set to achieve average annual
capture of 80% to account for back to back storms (See rationale in Section B.4.3). In order
to use a different drawdown time, BMPs should be sized using the percent capture method
(Section B.4.2).
The average effective depth calculation should account for any aggregate/media in the BMP.
For example, 4 feet of stone at a porosity of 0.4 would equate to 1.6 feet of effective depth.
This method may overestimate drawdown time for BMPs that drain through both the bottom
and walls of the system. BMP specific calculations of drawdown time may be provided that
account for BMP-specific geometry.
is J
B-18 February 2016
Appendix B: Storm Water Pollutant Control Hydrologic Calculations and Sizing Methods
Worksheet B.2-1. DCV -. C.cWo,y life Wet/S (a a)
)$ \Imix'
I 85" percentile 24-hr storm depth from Figure B.1-1 6 inches
2 Area tributary to BMP (s) A= acres
Area weighted runoff factor (estimate using Appendix ,
3 B.I.1 and B.2.I) C .10 unitless
IO7Z4S
4 Tree wells volume reduction TCV= z 2.0 cubic-feet
5 Rain barrels volume reduction RCV= cubic-feet
Calculate DCV = —20
6 (3630 x C x d x A) - TCV - RCV DCV= cubic-feet
B-10 February 2016
Appendix B: Storm Water Pollutant Control Hydrologic Calculations and Sizing Methods
B.4.1 Simple Method - O.xttko' O4U Ttfe WeIt (Z
Stepwise Instructions:
Compute DCV using Worksheet B.4-1.
Estimate design infiltration rate using Form 1-9 in Appendix I.
Design BMP(s) to ensure that the DCV is fully retained (i.e., no surface discharge during the
design event) and the stored effective depth draws down in no longer than 36 hours.
Worksheet B.4-1: Simple Sizing Method for Infiltration BMPs
Bob
1 DCV (Worksheet B.2-1) DCV= I S.V1 cubic-feet
2 Estimated design infiltration rate (Form 1-9 in Appendix
11)
in/hr
3 1 Available BM? surface area ABMP 32... sq-ft
Average effective depth in the BMP footprint D O 4 feet
- (DCV/ABMP)
5 Drawdown time, T (D *12/J(.,) T= 3 .(fl hours
6 Provide alternative calculation of drawdown time, if needed. 3•(fl < 3( OK I
nj
Notes:
Drawdown time must be less than 36 hours. This criterion was set to achieve average annual
capture of 80% to account for back to back storms (See rationale in Section B.4.3). In order
to use a different drawdown time, BMPs should be sized using the percent capture method
(Section B.4.2).
The average effective depth calculation should account for any aggregate/media in the BMP.
For example, 4 feet of stone at a porosity of 0.4 would equate to 1.6 feet of effective depth.
This method may overestimate drawdown time for BMPs that drain through both the bottom
and walls of the system. BMP specific calculations of drawdown time may be provided that
account for BMP-specific geometry.
B-18 February 2016
ATTACHMENT I
POLLUTANT CONTROL BMP DESIGN WORKSHEETS! CALCULATIONS
Appendix I: Forms and Checklists
r I A__. f)
j WU-ILtVsrrIIUPJ a'tr ___
JFactor tsII Safety and UDesign IInfiltration[fj
r!JtIjII Form 1-9
I . Assigned Factor ' Product (p)
Factor Category Factor Description Weight (w) Value (v) p = w xv
Soil assessment methods 0.25
Predominant soil texture 0.25
Suitability Site soil variability 0.25
A Assessment Depth to groundwater / impervious
layer
025
Suitability Assessment Safety Factor, S = Zp
Level of pretreatment/ expected 0.5 sediment loads
B Design Redundancy/resiliency 0.25
Compaction during construction 0.25
Design Safety Factor, Sn = Ep
Combined Safety Factor, S,= SA x SB (4
Observed Infiltration Rate, inch/hr, Kobsemed ô u ilw (corrected for test-specific bias)
Design Infiltration Rate, in/hr, Kta4, = / Si I (.S
Supporting Data
Briefly describe infiltration test and provide reference to test forms:
rs- frric!ep su EWT W)TED o./0/j(
"GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION, PROPOSED BUILDING EXPANSION AND PARKING
IMPROVEMENTS, BLUEWATER GRILL RESTAURANT, 417 CARLSBAD VILLAGE DRIVE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA" BY SMS GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
1-7 February 2016
ATTACHMENT ID
FORM 1-8, CATEGORIZATION OF INFILTRATION FEASIBILITY CONDITION
ATTACHMENT IAIIB
DMA EXHIBIT AND TABLE
ATTACHMENT I
BACKUP FOR PDP POLLUTANT CONTROL BMPS
Check which Items are Included behind this cover sheet:
Attachment Contents Checklist
Sequence
Attachment I DMA Exhibit (Required) X Included
See DMA Exhibit Checklist on the
back of this Attachment cover sheet.
(24"x36" Exhibit typically required)
Attachment lb Tabular Summary of DMAs Showing X Included on DMA Exhibit in
DMA ID matching DMA Exhibit, DMA Attachment 1
Area, and DMA Type (Required)* 0 Included as Attachment I b,
separate from DMA Exhibit *Provide table in this Attachment OR
on DMA Exhibit in Attachment 1
Attachment lc Form 1-7, Harvest and Use Feasibility 0 Included
Screening Checklist (Required unless X Not included because the entire
the entire project will use infiltration project will use infiltration BMPs
BMPs)
Refer to Appendix 13.3-I of the BMP
Design Manual to complete Form 1-7.
Attachment Id Form 1-8, Categorization of Infiltration X Included
Feasibility Condition (Required unless 0 Not included because the entire
the project will use harvest and use project will use harvest and use
BMPs) BMPs
Refer to Appendices C and D of the
BMP Design Manual to complete
Form 1-8.
Attachment le Pollutant Control BMP Design X Included
Worksheets I Calculations (Required)
Refer to Appendices B and E of the
BMP Design Manual for structural
pollutant control BMP design
guidelines
Structural BMP Summary Information
[Copy this page as needed to provide Information for each individual proposed
structural BMP]
Structural BMP ID No. BMP-2
DWG No. 4924A
Type of structural BMP:
Retention by harvest and use (HU-1)
X Retention by infiltration basin (INF-1)
Retention by bioretention (INF-2)
Retention by permeable pavement (lNF-3)
Partial retention by biofiltration with partial retention (PRA)
Bioflltration (BF-1)
Flow-thru treatment control included as pre-treatment/forebay for an onsite retention or
biofiltration BMP (provide BMP type/description and indicate which onsite retention or
biofiltration BMP it serves in discussion section below)
Detention pond or vault for hydromodification management
Other (describe in discussion section below)
Purpose:
X Pollutant control only
Hydromodification control only
Combined pollutant control and hydromodification control
Pre-treatment/forebay for another structural BMP
Other (describe in discussion section below)
Discussion (as needed):
THE PROPOSED 300 SF ECORAIN INFILTRATION BASIN (INF-1) WILL TREAT THE ENTIRE
12,994 SF SITE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE NEW 1,202 SF OUTDOOR DINING AREA
WHICH WILL BE TREATED WITH TWO TREE WELLS (SD-1). THE INFILTRATION BASIN
WILL HAVE A PRE-TREATMENT FILTER FOR COARSE SEDIMENT AND TRASH REMOVAL
AT THE NEW INTAKE CATCH BASIN.
Identification of Receiving Water Pollutants of Concern
Describe path of storm water from the project site to the Pacific Ocean (or bay, lagoon, lake or
reservoir, as applicable):
THE PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 0.5 MILES EAST OF THE
PACIFIC OCEAN WITHIN THE BUENA VISTA CREEK WATERSHED WHICH
DISCHARGES TO THE PACIFIC OCEAN VIA THE BUENA VISTA LAGOON.
List any 303(d) impaired water bodies within the path of storm water from the project site to the
Pacific Ocean (or bay, lagoon, lake or reservoir, as applicable), identify the
pollutant(s)/stressor(s) causing impairment, and identify any TMDL5 for the impaired water
bodies:
303(d) Impaired Water Body Pollutant(s)IStressor(s) TMDLs
BUENA VISTA LAGOON NUTRIENTS I EUTROPHICATI N
BUENA VISTA LAGOON SEDIMENTATION I SILTATION
BUENA VISTA LAGOON BACTERIA
Identification of Project Site Pollutants
Identify pollutants anticipated from the project site based on all proposed use(s) of the site (see
BMP Design Manual Appendix B.6):
Pollutant
Not Applicable to
the Project Site
Anticipated from the
Project Site
Also a Receiving
Water Pollutant of
Concern
Sediment X X
Nutrients X X
Heavy Metals X X
Organic Compounds X X
Trash & Debris X
Oxygen Demanding
Substances X
OiI& Grease
X
Bacteria & Viruses X X
Pesticides X
Structural BMP Summary Information
[Copy this page as needed to provide information for each individual proposed
structural BMP]
Structural BMP ID No. BMP-1
DWG No. 492-4A
Type of structural BMP:
Retention by harvest and use (HU-I)
Retention by infiltration basin (INF-I)
Retention by bioretention (INF-2)
Retention by permeable pavement (INF-3)
Partial retention by biofiltration with partial retention (PR-1)
Bioflltration (BF-1)
Flow-thru treatment control included as pre-treatment/forebay for an onsite retention or
biofiltration BMP (provide BMP type/description and indicate which onsite retention or
biofiltration BMP it serves in discussion section below)
Detention pond or vault for hydromodification management
X Other (describe in discussion section below)
Purpose:
X Pollutant control only
Hydromodification control only
Combined pollutant control and hydromodification control
Pre-treatmentlforebay for another structural BMP
D Other (describe in discussion section below)
Discussion (as needed):
THE PROPOSED SITE INCLUDES A NEW 1,202 SF OUTDOOR DINING AREA WHICH
WILL BE TREATED WITH TWO TREE WELLS (SD-1) AS THE SITE/STRUCTURAL BMP.
PDP Structural BMPs
All POPs must implement structural BMPs for storm water pollutant control (see Chapter 5 of
the BMP Design Manual). Selection of POP structural BMPs for storm water pollutant control
must be based on the selection process described in Chapter 5. PDPs subject to
hydromodification management requirements must also implement structural BMPs for flow
control for hydromodification management (see Chapter 6 of the BMP Design Manual). Both
storm water pollutant control and flow control for hydromodification management can be
achieved within the same structural BMP(s).
PDP structural BMPs must be verified by the City. at the completion of construction. This may
include requiring the project owner or project owner's representative to certify construction of
the structural BMPs (see Section 1.12 of the BMP Design Manual). POP structural BMPs must
be maintained into perpetuity, and the City must confirm the maintenance (see Section 7 of the
BMP Design Manual).
Use this form to provide narrative description of the general strategy for structural BMP
implementation at the project site in the box below. Then complete the POP structural BMP
summary information sheet for each structural BMP within the project (copy the BMP summary
information page as many times as needed to provide summary information for each individual
structural BMP).
Describe the general strategy for structural BMP implementation at the site. This information
must describe how the steps for selecting and designing storm water pollutant control BMPs
presented in Section 5.1 of the BMP Design Manual were followed, and the results (type of
BMPs selected). For projects requiring hydromodification flow control BMPs, indicate whether
pollutant control and flow control BMPs are integrated together or separate.
THE EXISTING SITE HAS AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 12,994 SF WITH 12,407 SF (95%)
CONSISTING OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL REDEVELOP
AND/OR ADD 8,755 SF OF IMPERVIOUS AREA RESULTING IN A 70.5% CHANGE WHEN
COMPARED TO THE EXISTING SITE THEREFORE REQUIRING THE ENTIRE SITE TO BE
TREATED WITH STRUCTURAL BMPS. TO ACCOMPLISH THIS, TWO TREE WELLS (BMP-1)
ARE BEING ADDED TO THE NEW OUTDOOR PATIO AREA AND A NEW 300 SF
UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION TANK (BMP-2) WILL BE INSTALLED UNDER THE
REDEVELOPED PARKING AREA. OVERALL, THE DRAINAGE PATTERN OF THE EXISTING
SITE IS BEING MAINTAINED. THE ONLY CHANGE IS THE ADDITION OF THE BMPS TO
REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF WATER LEAVING THE SITE THROUGH EXISTING CITY STORM
DRAINS. THE ONLY STORM WATER THAT COULD POTENTIALLY LEAVE THE SITE WILL
DO SO THROUGH OVERFLOW LINES AT BOTH THE TREE WELLS AND INFILTRATION
TANK. FINALLY, THE EXISTING OFF-SITE TRIBUTARY AREAS PRODUCING RUN-ON ARE
BEING ACCOUNTED FOR WITH THE BMP OVERFLOW DEVICES AND HAVE BEEN SIZED
FOR THE 100-YEAR STORM EVENT.
Source Control Requirement (continued) Applied?
SD-6 Runoff Collection 0 Yes 0 No I 0 N/A
Discussionfjustification if SD-6 not implemented:
SD-7 Landscaping with Native or Drought Tolerant Species I i Yes I 0 No I 0 N/A
Discussion/justification if SD-7 not implemented:
SD-8 Harvesting and Using Precipitation I 0 Yes 0 No I 0 NIA
Discussion/justification if SD-8 not implemented:
Not used due to lack of pervious area on existing site. Two tree-well infiltration BMPs used instead.
E-36 Page 4 of 4 Revised 03/16
Site Design BMPs
All development projects must implement site design BMPs SD-1 through SD-8 where applicable and feasible. See
Chapter 4 and Appendix E.2 thru E.6 of the BMP Design Manual for information to implement site design BMPs shown in
this checklist.
Answer each category below pursuant to the following.
"Yes" means the project will implement the site design BMPs as described in Chapter 4 and/or Appendix E.2 thru E.6 of
the Model BMP Design Manual. Discussion /justification is not required.
"No" means the BMPs is applicable to the project but it is not feasible to implement. Discussion/justification must be
provided. Please add attachments if more space is needed.
"N/A" means the BMPs is not applicable at the project site because the project does not include the feature that is
addressed by the BMPs (e.g., the project site has no existing natural areas to conserve). Discussion/justification may be
provided.
Source Control Requirement Applied?
SD-1 Maintain Natural Drainage Pathways and Hydrologic Features 0 Yes I 0 No 1 0 N/A
Discussion/justification if SD-I not implemented:
SD-2 Conserve Natural Areas, Soils, and Vegetation I 0 Yes I 0 No 1 0 N/A
Discussion/justification if SD-2 not implemented:
SD-3 Minimize Impervious Area I J Yes I 0 No I 0 N/A
Discussion/justification if SD-3 not implemented:
SD-4 Minimize Soil Compaction I i Yes I 0 No I 0 N/A
'Discussion/justification if SD-4 not implemented:
SD-5 Impervious Area Dispersion I0 Yes I 0 No I 0 N/A
Discussion/justification if SD-5 not implemented:
E-36 Page 3 of 4 Revised 03/16
On-site storm drain inlets: (1) Show locations of inlets on drawings; (2) Mark all inlets with the words
"No Dumping! Flows to Bay" or similar.
Interior floor drains and elevator shaft sump pumps: (1) State that interior floor drains and elevator
shaft sump pumps will be plumbed to sanitary sewer.
Need for future indoor & structural pest control: (1) Note building design features that discourage
entry of pests.
Landscape/Outdoor Pesticide Use: (1) On drawings, show locations of existing trees or areas of shrubs
and ground cover to be undisturbed and retained; (2) Design landscaping to minimize irrigation and
runoff, to promote surface infiltration where appropriate, and to minimize the use of fertilizers and
pesticides that can contribute to storm water pollution.
S. Food service: (1) On drawings, show a note that this drain will be connected to a grease interceptor
before discharging to the sanitary sewer.
Refuse areas: (1) On drawings, show where site refuse and recycled materials will be handled and
stored for pickup; (2) State that signs will be posted on or near dumpsters with the words "Do not dump
hazardous materials here" or similar.
Outdoor storage of equipment or materials: (1) On drawings, show any outdoor storage areas,
including how materials will be covered. Show how areas will be graded and bermed to prevent run-on
or runoff from area and protected from wind dispersal.
Fire Sprinkler Test Water: (1) Provide a means to drain fire sprinkler test water to the sanitary sewer
or approved BMP.
Miscellaneous Drain or Wash Water: (1) Any drainage sumps onsite shall feature a sediment sump to
reduce the quantity of sediment in pumped water; (2) Avoid roofing, gutters, and trim made of copper
or other unprotected metals that may leach into runoff.
Plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots: (1) Plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots shall be swept regularly to
prevent the accumulation of litter and debris.
Source Control Requirement (continued) Applied?
SC-4 Protect Materials Stored in Outdoor Work Areas from Rainfall, Run-On Runoff, and
Wind Dispersal l Yes 0 No [[:] N/A
Discussion/justification if SC-4 not implemented:
SC-5 Protect Trash Storage Areas from Rainfall, Run-On, Runoff, and Wind Dispersal 0 Yes C3 *No 0 N/A
Discussionfjustification if SC-5 not implemented:
SC-6 Additional BMPs based on Potential Sources of Runoff Pollutants must answer for each source listed below and
identify additional BMPs. (See Table in Appendix E.1 of BMP Manual for guidance).
J On-site storm drain inlets 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
J Interior floor drains and elevator shaft sump pumps 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Interior parking garages 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Need for future indoor & structural pest control 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
J Landscape/Outdoor Pesticide Use 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Pools, spas, ponds, decorative fountains, and other water features 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
121 Food service 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
121 Refuse areas 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Industrial processes 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
121 Outdoor storage of equipment or materials 121 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Vehicle/Equipment Repair and Maintenance 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Fuel Dispensing Areas 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Loading Docks 121 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
121 Fire Sprinkler Test Water 121 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
121 Miscellaneous Drain or Wash Water 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
121 Plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots 121 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
For "Yes answers, identify the additional BMP per Appendix E.1. Provide justification for "No" answers.
See next page for responses.
E-36 Page 2 of 4 Revised 03/16
(city of
Carlsbad
STANDARD PROJECT
REQUIREMENT
CHECKLIST
E-36
Development Services
Land Development Engineering
1635 Faraday Avenue
(760) 602-2750
www.carlsbadca.gov
Project Information
Project Name: BWG CARLSBAD
Project ID: RP 92-I0(A)/CDP 92-08(A)
DWG No. or Building Permit No.: PC16-000I
Source Control BMPs
All development projects must implement source control BMPs SC-1 through SC-6 where applicable and feasible. See
Chapter 4 and Appendix E.Iof the BMP Design Manual for information to implement source control BMPs shown in this
checklist.
Answer each category below pursuant to the following.
"Yes" means the project will implement the source control BMP as described in Chapter 4 and/or Appendix E.1 of the
Model BMP Design Manual. Discussionfjustification is not required.
"No" means the BMP is applicable to the project but it is not feasible to implement. Discussion/justification must be
provided. Please add attachments if more space is needed.
"N/A" means the BMP is not applicable at the project site because the project does not include the feature that is
addressed by the BMP (e.g., the project has no outdoor materials storage areas). Discussion/justification may be
provided.
Source Control Requirement Applied?
SC-1 Prevention of Illicit Discharges into the MS4 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Discussion/justification if SC-I not implemented:
SC-2 Storm Drain Stenciling or Signage 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A
Discussion/justification if SC-2 not implemented:
SC-3 Protect Outdoor Materials Storage Areas from Rainfall, Run-On, Runoff, and Wind J es Y N 0 0 0 N/A Dispersal
Discussion/justification if SC-3 not implemented:
E-36 Page 1 of 4 1 Revised 03/16
Other Site Requirements and Constraints
When applicable, list other site requirements or constraints that will influence storm water
management design, such as zoning requirements including setbacks and open space, or City
codes governing minimum street width, sidewalk construction, allowable pavement types, and
drainage requirements.
THE PROJECT INVOLVES THE REDEVELOPMENT OR CREATION OF MORE THAN 50%
OF THE SITE'S EXISTING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA SO WE ARE REQUIRED TO
TREAT THE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, WITH
STRUCTURAL BMPs.
Optional Additional Information or Continuation of Previous Sections As Needed
This space provided for additional information or continuation of information from previous
sections as needed.
Flow Control for Post-Project Runoff*
*This Section only required if hydromodification management requirements apply
List and describe point(s) of compliance (POCs) for flow control for hydromodification
management (see Section 6.3.1). For each POC, provide a POC identification name or number
correlating to the project's HMP Exhibit and a receiving channel identification name or number
correlating to the project's HMP Exhibit.
Has a geomorphic assessment been performed for the receiving channel(s)?
No, the low flow threshold is 0.1 Q2 (default low flow threshold)
Yes, the result is the low flow threshold is 0.1 Q2
Yes, the result is the low flow threshold is 0.3Q2
0 Yes, the result is the low flow threshold is 0.5Q2
If a geomorphic assessment has been performed, provide title, date, and preparer:
Discussion I Additional Information: (optional)
Hydromodification Management Requirements
Do hydromodification management requirements apply (see Section 1.6 of the BMP Design
Manual)?
Yes, hydromodification management flow control structural BMPs required.
X No, the project will discharge runoff directly to existing underground storm drains discharging
directly to water storage reservoirs, lakes, enclosed embayments, or the Pacific Ocean.
No, the project will discharge runoff directly to conveyance channels whose bed and bank are
concrete-lined all the way from the point of discharge to water storage reservoirs, lakes,
enclosed embayments, or the Pacific Ocean.
No, the project will discharge runoff directly to an area identified as appropriate for an
exemption by the WMAA for the watershed in which the project resides.
Description I Additional Information (to be provided if a 'No' answer has been selected above):.
ALL STORM WATER WILL BE TREATED BY EITHER TREE WELLS OR AN
INFILTRATION PIT AND OVERFLOW TO EXISTING STORM DRAINS.
Critical Coarse Sediment Yield Areas*
*This Section only required if hydromodification management requirements apply
Based on the maps provided within the WMAA, do potential critical coarse sediment yield areas
exist within the project drainage boundaries?
Yes
No, No critical coarse sediment yield areas to be protected based on WMAA maps
If yes, have any of the optional analyses presented in Section 6.2 of the BMP Design Manual
been performed?
06.2.1 Verification of Geomorphic Landscape Units (GLUs) Onsite
06.2.2 Downstream Systems Sensitivity to Coarse Sediment
06.2.3 Optional Additional Analysis of Potential Critical Coarse Sediment Yield Areas Onsite
0 No optional analyses performed, the project will avoid critical coarse sediment yield areas
identified based on WMAA maps
If optional analyses were performed, what is the final result?
0 No critical coarse sediment yield areas to be protected based on verification ofGLUs onsite
0 Critical coarse sediment yield areas exist but additional analysis has determined that
protection is not required. Documentation attached in Attachment 8 of the SWQMP.
0 Critical coarse sediment yield areas exist and require protection. The project will implement
management measures described in Sections 6.2.4 and 6.2.5 as applicable, and the areas
are identified on the SWQMP Exhibit.
Discussion I Additional Information:
Identify whether any of the following features, activities, and/or pollutant source areas will be
present (select all that apply):
1K On-site storm drain inlets
X Interior floor drains and elevator shaft sump pumps
Interior parking garages
X Need for future indoor & structural pest control
X Landscape/Outdoor Pesticide Use
Pools, spas, ponds, decorative fountains, and other water features
X Food service
X Refuse areas
Industrial processes
XOutdoor storage of equipment or materials
XVehicle and Equipment Cleaning
Vehicle/Equipment Repair and Maintenance
Fuel Dispensing Areas
Loading Docks
X Fire Sprinkler Test Water
X Miscellaneous Drain or Wash Water
X Plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots