HomeMy WebLinkAboutCUP 2017-0008; OAKMONT OF CARLSBAD; SEWER REPORT; 2019-08-01I
RECiwY
I IM3 Io_t
SEWER REPOIT iiitjaI Date
FOR
OAKMONT OF CARLSBAD
LOT 1 of CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH
Cup 2017-0008
GR2019-0013
DWG. 517-4A
Prepared For:
Oakmont Senior Living
9240 Old Redwood Highway, Suite 200
Windsor, CA 95482
Prepared By:
Alliance Land Planning & Engineering, Inc.
2248 Faraday Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
At
RCMVET
SEP 082819
LAND DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING
OAKMONT OF CARLSBAD CUP 2017-0008 SEWER REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction......................................................................................................................................2
PublicSystem Impacts....................................................................................................................3
OnsitePipe Sizing............................................................................................................................3
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................3
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - SEWER EXHIBIT
APPENDIX B - SEWER GENERATION FACTORS
APPENDIC C - HYDRAULIC MODELING OUTPUT DATA
OAKMONT OF CARLSBAD
CUP 2017-0008
SEWER REPORT
Introduction
The following is a Sewer Capacity Analysis Report for the Private Sewer System within the
Oakmont of Carlsbad project (Lot 1), which is part of the Carlsbad Oaks North Master
project. The private system has been designed using the Uniform Plumbing Code required
for private system design. The UPC sets maximum drainage fixture units (DFUs) for pipe
sizes and provides DFUs capacity safety factors for pipe grades less than 2.0%. The sewer
system within the Oakmont of Carlsbad site has been designed to meet these standards and
specifications.
Methodology
As discussed with City of Carlsbad, Private Systems are not designed according to Public
Sewer Design standards (City/County Standard) but using the aforementioned UPC. City
design standards for public sewer systems use an alternative methodology for calculating
discharge, minimum slopes velocity and capacity which will make the analysis flawed if
methods/standards were to both be followed. The Oakmont of Carlsbad sewer system
follows UPC guidelines for pipe sizing and is displayed in an exhibit included in Appendix A.
Maximum slopes we're applied during design to meet grade of the P.O.C. at the project
property line. Capacity in each segment of sewer pipe is designed to sufficiently convey
calculated DFUs generated from the 3 proposed buildings.
Sewer Generation
Below is a summary of sewer generation calculations that compare the existing land use at
the site (industrial) to the currently proposed land use (residential, with no kitchen).
Oakmont Senior Living Center Flows vs. Original Buildout Model Flows
ZONE Building Area (sO I UNITS FACTOR REDUCTION FLOW (gpd)
(E) INDUSTRIAL 277,913 - 800 gpd/10,000sf 0.5 1 11,117
(P) RESIDENTIAL,
- 151 220 gpd/EDU 0.6 2 19,932 NO KITCHEN
1 Reduction for 50% coverage
2 Reduction for no kitchen use within each unit
The proposed sewer generation flow is considered conservative as Carlsbad bases their
residential factor at a 220 gpd/EDU rate based on 2.76 residents per unit where Oakmont
Senior Living facilities typically only have one resident per unit. In addition, the residents
rarely, if at all, are able to use the kitchen facilities within their own unit. Even though the
kitchen reduction factor is applied, the 220 gpd/EDU basis is considered an over-estimation
of the actual generation within the Oakmont units.
OAKMONT OF CARLSBAD
CUP 2017-0008
SEWER REPORT
Public System Impacts
Since the proposed Oakmont land use generates more sewer flow than does the existing site
land use, analysis of the City's municipal system is warranted. Proposed site flows of 19,932
gpd were provided to the City to confirm the increase does not significantly impact the
existing public system.
Impacts were assessed by calculating a proposed Peak Wet Weather Flow (PWWF) within
the main servicing the Senior Center, through the use of Hydraulic Modeling. The model
analyzed a combination of discharges, including proposed flow from the Senior Center and
existing flows generated from two Industrial Parks located upgradient. The proposed PWWF
in the sewer main servicing the Senior Center was derived from the model to equal 0.79
mgd. The capacity of the El Fuerte Lift Station was provided by the City to equal 1.40 mgd,
therefore deeming the proposed private sewer system acceptable. Model output data and
calculations are located in Appendix C.
Onsite Pipe Sizing
UPC Table 703.2 - Maximum Unit Load and Maximum Length of Drainage and Vent Pipe,
was used to determine maximum DFU capacity and pipe size for each onsite sewer lateral
and main. Despite calculating maximum pipe slopes throughout the onsite system, some
laterals and mains were designed to less than 2.0% grade due to tie-in constraints at the
ultimate P.O.C. at the northeast site entrance. Irrespective, the system has been designed
using the UPC safety factors for pipes with slope less than 2.0%, resulting in adequate
conveyance of design DFU quantities in all laterals and mains throughout the system. A
comparison of the design DFU versus the proposed maximum DFU capacity is shown for
laterals and mains on the sewer plan included.
Conclusion
The sewer flows proposed at the Oakmont Senior Living facility are considered conservative
in nature. Based on results from the City's analysis for offsite public system impacts, the
private sewer system described here is considered acceptable for construction.
APPENDIX A
SEWER EXHIBIT
OAKMONT OF CARLSBAD
SEWER AREA STUDY EXHIBIT
LOT 1 OF TRACT No. 14926
)N I
Vicinity Map
NO SCALE
BILL OF MATERIALS
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTIFY STD. DWG. REFERENCE
CONNECT TO EXISTING 8" SEWER LATERAL PER DWG 480-3 1 EA DWC 480-3
CONSTRUCT 6" PVC (SDR 35) SEWER LINE 1,120 LF
CONSTRUCT 8" PVC (sDR 35) SEWER LINE 550 LF
CONSTRUCT SEWER CLEANOUT 24 EA CITY STD. S-6
CONSTRUCT SEWER MANHOLE 2 EA CITY STD. S-i
(,- CONSTRUCT 1,200 GALLON CREASE INTERCEPTOR 1 LA
0 25
230
220
N °
225
-
/ao
0 ;
240
\ k
\ \7'7
\\
1
1-000
ill) S
11,000,
10000,
/2 7 \\ \\
/
/2 /
zz
/
CURB CURB
-
/ / 28'
14' 14'
. -
/ A.C. PAVEMENTJJ COMPACTED 104
/ - - - V BASE COURSE SU BGRADE
i- PRIVATE DRIVE
.7 V NOT TO SCALE
- - V
- - V
0
0I APPLICANT CML ENGINEER ENVIRONMENTAL,
-
- -' - - OAKMONT SENIOR LIVING ALLIANCE LAND PLANNING AND ENGINEERING OAKMONT SENIOR LIVING
GRAPHIC SCALE
40 0 20 40 80
( IN FEET )
1 inch = 40 ft.
...-' ...-
. - -'
L) rc uvvuuu nVV I iL'FU UL
WINDSOR,
2248 r/-\m/-\u/-\i /-\VL JL'+U ULU RCUVVUUU flVV I
CA 95492 CARLSBAD, CA 920064 WINDSOR, CA 95492
loe V (707) 535-3200 FAX (707) 535-3299 (760) 431-9896 (707) 535-3200 FAX (707) 535-3299
V
ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
ALl IQBAL LANDESIGN GROUP
- .' 9240 OLD REDWOOD HWY 3344 GAVENSTEIN HWY NORTH
>- WINDSOR, CA 95492 SEBASTOPO, CA 95472
f7(V7\ 7C)rII\ FAV (lrh7\ 7C)C)C\ (r\ OC)C\ C)7OC\ rAy f7C)7\ OIl') 7A17
2248 FARADAY AVE.
CARLSBAD, CA 92008
TEL: (760) 431-9896
FAX: (760) 431-8802
27413 TOURNEY ROAD ALLIANCE SUITE 120
VALENCIA CA 91355
LAND PLANNING & ENGINEERING INC. TEL: (661) 799-2760
FAX: (661) 254-1929
PLANS PREPARED BY:
ALLIANCE LAND PLANNING & ENGINEERING INC.
2248 FARADAY AVE., CARLSBAD, CA 92008
(760) 431-9896
PLANS PREPARED UNDE ,XE DIRECTION OF:
JASO F. ROOM NO. 61297
.- -,._
I,/UI) UJ.)JLUU 1/-\A I/U/) UUJJL /U/) OLLJOU r/-'.A IfUI) 0L39I/
-5-----
PLANS PREPARED FOR: BENCHMARK PROPERTY OWNER:
SHEET
-i
I CITY OF CARLSBAD I SHEET
1 SAN DIEGO COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BENCHMARK NO.:
OAKMONT OF CARLSBAD - OWNER NAME: OAKMONT SENIOR LIVING NO. 61297 z OWNER DESCRIPTION: 2" ALUMINUM DISC STAMPED OPS CONTROL PIT. 2002
EXP 6 SEWER NAME: OAKMONT SENIOR LIVING AREA STUDY EXHIBIT -3
CIVIL STREET 9240 OLD REDWOOD HWY, SUITE 20o IN SIDEWALK NORTH SIDE OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD, STREET 220 CONCOURSE BLVD. SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ADDRESS WINDSOR, CA 95492 300—FEET WEST OF MELROSE DRIVE. ADDRESS SANTA ROSA, CA 950403
fl 71 ._.. .__ ........-..___. ,__ 2740 FARADAY AVENUE SQc' .... . -- RFflflRfl FRflA Rn NIn 17771 (PT NI
8/23/19 Al IN: HANNAH DAUGHLRIY (707) 535-3211 ''
,S.. . - ATTN: Al IN: HANNAH DAUGHLkIY (/0/) 535-3211
DATE ELEVATION: 444.00 MSL CARLSBAD, CA 92008 CIVIL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • HILLSIDE DESIGN • SURVEYING
APPENDIX B
SEWER GENERATION FACTORS
I
Sf-.. f•'' ---.:, ,.' -. ' '.:
-' ... 5'.
•." ,
-
spreadsheet for future development in LFMZ I was provided by City Staff. The spreadsheet. which
includes parcel numbers, is more detailed than the Growth Database backup sheet and was used to
locate future development in LFMZ 1, which is primarily redevelopment in the downtown area.
Once future development projections were linked to parcels, a map of future development was
prepared and reviewed for accuracy. In the Growth Database, once building permits are issued the
development is assigned to that calendar year and is no longer considered future development
Construction does not necessarily begin right after permits are issued, however, and it may take several
years before developments are occupied and contributing sewer flows. This creates a lag between
"existing" and "future" development. Since future flows based on the Growth Database are added to the
existing hydraulic model with 2009 wastewater flow data, development projects with recent building
permits that have not yet been constructed or are not yet contributing wastewater flows need to be
included. To identify these developments, projects in the Growth Database with building permits issued
in the past three years were reviewed together with the most recent land use map, aerial photographs,
and water use records. This investigation identified developments that were not contributing
wastewater flows during the 2009 metering period and resulted in a significant increase in future"
development, primarily in some of the newer industrial parks, portions of Bressi Ranch, and In
Robertson Ranch, where building permits have already been issued for the first phases.
Several additional refinements were also made to the modified parcel-based growth database to account
for future flows to the wastewater system. These included?
• Future recreation facilities in parks and a future high school in LFMZ 14 were added.
Residential properties that currently have septic systems were added on the assumption that
they will ultimately connect to the sewer system. These parcels were identified by City Staff
based on water and sewer billing records.
Residential units within the service areas of the La Golondrina and La Costa Meadows Ill Lift
Stations were added to account for the additional flows that have been re-directed into
Carlsbad with the construction of new gravity sewers and the recent removal of the lift stations.
Buildout projections for the proposed residential development known as Quarry Creek (LFMZ
25) were updated based on updated planning information provided by City Staff.
The residential categories were modified to separate high density development (apartment
complexes, as noted in the growth database backup sheets) from all other residential
development. This was done to more accurately project sewer flows, which are influenced more
by the number of people per household than the lot size.
Exhibit 2 in Appendix A illustrates the parcels with future development within the sewer service area.
5.3 FUTURE FLOW GENERATION FACTORS
Flow, generation factors are used, in conjunction with the modified Growth Database, to project
ultimate wastewater flows. Unit flow generation rates were developed and presented in Chapter 3 of
this report based on 2009 flow data. For planning purposes. more conservative unit flow factors are
typically used. The City's established planning value for wascewater flow is 220 gpdJEDU. Flow factors
typically used for design of sewer systems throughout San Diego County range between approximately
200 gpd!EDU in the Cities of Encinitas and Solana Beach, to 250 gpdfEDLJ in the City of Vista. The City
City of Carlsbad DUDEI(
SEWER MASTER PLAN 5-4 April 2012
of San Diego Water & Sewer Design Guide recommends the use of 80 gallons per capita day (gpcd).
which equates to 197 gpd/DU for the City of Carlsbad (based on 2.46 persons per household). Based on
these comparisons and the calculated unit flow race for current conditions, the previously established
flow generation rate of 220 gpd/EDU is considered to be appropriately conservative for flow projections
in this master plan update. A lower unit flow factor of 176 gpd (80 percent of 220 gpd/EDU) is applied
to high-density residential units in excess of approximately 20 units per acre (apartment complexes).
A non-residential land use flow factor of 800 gpd per 10,000 square feet of building area is applied to
commercial and industrial development projections in the Growth Database. The composite
commercialfindustrial unit factor was approved by City Staff for planning purposes, and is higher than the
average unit .flow calculated in the unit flow analysis documented in Section 3.7. It is noted that
projections made using this factor are based on a mix of development types in existing
businesslindustrial parks and may not be representative of smaller areas with a single land use type. Flow
projections for future schools, resort hotels, and the expansion of the Legoland Water Park are based
on EDU conversions documented in the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Table 13.10.020c).
The unit flow factors established by City Staff to project uftin'1ate wastewater flows in this Master Plan
Update are summarized in Table 5-2,
Table 5.2 Wastewater Unit Flow Factors
Residential Low Density to Med-Higi Density 220 gpd/DL
Pesidenial High Density (Aparnneots) 176 pdJDU
Commerclai/lndustrtal 800 gpd/ 10.000 sq ft of building area
High School 7.33 gprJ!student
Hovel I32 gpd/guest room
Water Park (Legoland) 3,740 gpd/developed acre
5.4 PROJECTED ULTIMATE FLOWS
Wastewater flow projections for future developments are made by applying the unit flow factors to the
future build-out data in the modified Growth Database. Future wastewater flows are projected to be
approximately 2.1 mgd and are summarized in Table 5-3. The future flows are based on flow projections
for future development, and also include unit counts for existing residences that currently have septic
systems and areas in LFMZ 6 that previously were pumped to LWWD from the La Golondrina and La
Costa Meadows Lift Stations. It is rioted that a minor wastewater service area boundary adjustment is
assumed in the future to serve existing LWWD customers within the area of a proposed residential
development located on the west side of El Camino Real, just south of Poinsettia Lane.
City of Carlsbad DUDEK.
SEWER MAs-rER PLAN 5-5 April 2012
,1.
APPENDIX C
PUBLIC SYSTEM HYDRAULIC MODEL OUTPUT DATA
Model Output Reference Figure
1. Senior
Center
2. Industrial Pack oaf cels
contributing flow to gravity
main servicing Senior
Center
areu and Jie
Mud arc Rt cc a
N iridusir al PaR
TrOuta: as
Mannoies
- Gravity Man
3. Industrial Park parcels
tributary to El Fuerte LS but not
contributing flows to gravity
main servicing Senior Center
L \ \ 7•*•
1
rtW Aap° *4
a
Summary Tables
Table 1. Summary Table for Uodated Flows from Senior Living Center
Number
from Figure Parameter Value Unit
1 Original Loading for Senior Center Parcel from Hydraulic Model based m d g on Industrial Land Use (Average Dry Weather Flow) 0.0053
1 Updated Loading for Senior Center (Average Dry Weather Flow) 1 mgd 0.020
2 Original Loading for Industrial Park parcels contributing flow to gravity m d g main servicing Senior Center (Average Dry Weather Flow) 0.13
2 Updated Loading for Industrial Park parcels contributing flow to m d g gravity main servicing Senior Center (Average Dry Weather Flow) 0.28
1+2 Total Loading in Gravity Main Servicing Senior Center Parcel Including d Updated Senior Center Flows (Average Dry Weather Flow) 0.30
1+2 Peak Wet Weather Flow in Gravity Main Servicing Senior Center d Parcel with Updated Loading based on Hydraulic Model Output 0.43
1 + 2 Maximum Depth Over Diameter in Gravity Main Serving Senior Center d D Parcel from Hydraulic Model 0.46
Table 2. Summary Table for El Fuerte Uft Station Capacity Check
Number
from
Figure Parameter Value Unit
Original Loading for Industrial Park parcels tributary to El Fuerte IS
3 but not contributing flows to gravity main servicing Senior Center mgd
(Average Dry Weather Flow)
0.12
Updated Loading for Industrial Park parcels tributary to El Fuerte 1.5
3 but not contributing flows to gravity main servicing Senior Center mgd
(Average Dry Weather Flow) 1 0.24
Original Loading for El Fuerte IS Tributary Area Including Senior
1+2+3 Center Flows and Updated Industrial Flows (Average Dry Weather mgd
Flow) ° 0.25
Updated Loading for El Fuerte LS Tributary Area Including Senior
1+2+3 Center Flows and Updated Industrial Flows (Average Dry Weather mgd
Flow) 0.54
1+2+3 Peak Wet Weather Flow to El Fuerte lift Station Including Updated mgd Loading based on Hydraulic Model Output 0.79
1+2+3 El Fuerte Lift Station Rated Flow 1.40 mgd
1+2+3 Excess Capacity at El Fuerte Lift Station 0.61 mgd
-
Note 1: industrial flows originally in model based on 24% coverage. Flows were updated based on 50% coverage for this
analysis.
Table 3. Average Dry Weather Flow Summary Table
All Parcels Industrial Park Parcels
Industrial Park Parcels Contributing Flow Tributary to El Fuerte 1.5 All Areas
Senior Contributing Flow to to Gravity Main but Not Contributing Tributary
Center Gravity Main Servicing Servicing Senior Flows to Gravity Main to El Fuerte
Parameter Parcel Senior Center Center Servicing Senior Center 1.5
Area Number 1 2 1+2 3 1+2+3
from Figure
Original Loading
from Model 0.0053 0.13 0.14 0.12 0.25 ADWF (mgd)
First Updated
Loading with 24%
Industrial 0.020 0.13 0.15 0.12 0.27 Coverage ADWF
(mgd)
Second Updated
Loading with 50%
Industrial 0.020 0.28 0.30 0.24 0.54 Coverage ADWF -
(mgd)
Flow Calculation Tables
Table 1. Oakmont Senior Living Center Flows vs. Original Buildout Model Flows
Number
from Figure Parameter Value Unit Explanation
6.4 acres Existing area contributing to main loaded with
Oakmont Senior Living Center flows
43,560 sqft/acre Conversion acre to square feet
277,913 sqft Existing area in square feet
24% Coverage Building footprint vs. land use area for single story Industrial Park
Land Use ___________ ____________ building
66,699
Building
sqft Calculated building area for single story buildings Calculations 1
gpd/sqft Flow factor for Commercial/ Industrial land use
0.08 from 2012 Sewer Master Plan
gpd Calculated flow (gpd/sqft* Building sqft) 5,336
mgd Calculated ADWF in mgd (included in model) 0.0053
220 gpd/EDU Sewer Flow Generation Rate per EDU
0.6 Reduction Reduction for Residential with No Kitchen
132 gpd/EDU Sewer Flow Generation Rate per EDU with No
Residential Land Kitchen
151 EDU EDUs in El Fuerte/Gateway Senior Living Center Use Flow
Calculations 2
gpd Calculated flow (gpd/EDU*number of EDUs) 19,932
0.020 mgd Calculated ADWF in mgd
-
Note 1: Flows Included in the buildout model scenario for the senior center parcel, originally Industrial Park land use based on 24% coverage
Note 2: Flows calculated for the senior center based on EDU count and flow generation rate
Table 2. Buildout Peak Wet Weather Flow Calculations (Based on Land Use) and Model Results
Number
from Figure Parameter Value Unit Explanation
Senior
1 Center 0.020 mgd Calculated ADWF in mgd (from Table 1)
ADWF
Senior Peaking factor for PDWF based on diurnal pattern
1 Center 1.29 - in model (8:00 am)
0.026 mgd Calculated PDWF (PFADWF) PDWF
Buildout area contributing to main loaded with 158 acres Oakmont Senior Living Center flows
Building footprint vs. land use area for single story
Original
24% Coverage building
sqft/acre Conversion acre to square feet Calculations
for 43,560
Building sqft Calculated building area for single story buildings 2 Upstream
Industrial 1,651,560
0.08 gpd/sqft Flow factor for Commercial/ Industrial land use Park Parcels
ADWF from 2012 Sewer Master Plan
gpd Calculated flow (gpd/sqft Building sqft) 132,125
0.132 mgd Calculated flow in mgd (included in model)
Buildout area contributing to main loaded with 158 acres Oakmont Senior Living Center flows
50% Coverage Building footprint vs. land use area for single story
Updated building
sqft/acre Conversion acre to square feet Calculations
for 43,560
Building sqft Calculated building area for single story buildings 2 Upstream
Industrial 3,440,749
0.08 gpd/sqft Flow factor for Commercial/ Industrial land use Park Parcels
ADWF 1 from 2012 Sewer Master Plan
gpd Calculated flow (gpd/sqft* Building sqft) 275,260
0.275 mgd Calculated flow in mgd (included in model)
Industrial Peaking factor for PDWF based on diurnal pattern
2 Park Parcels 1.45 - in model (10:00 am)
0.400 mgd Calculated PDWF (PF*ADWF) PDWF
1+2 Total ADWF 0.295 mgd Senior Center ADWF + Tributary ADWF
1+2 Total PDWF 0.426 mgd Senior Center PDWF + Tributary POWF
RDll Loading 0.005 mgd Wet weather inflow in model for area tributary to
1+2 senior center
1+2 Total PWWF 0.431 mgd Total PDWF + RDII Loading
Model 0.46 dID Maximum depth over diameter during PWWF 1+2 Results
Note 1: Industrial flows originally in model based on 24% coverage. Flows were updated based on 50% coverage
for this analysis.
Table 3. El Fuerte Lift Station Capacity Check for Buildout Peak Wet Weather Flow
Number
from
Figure Parameter Value Unit Explanation
1 Senior Center ADWF 0.020 mgd Calculated ADWF in mgd (from Table 1)
1 Senior Center PDWF 0.026 mgd Calculated PDWF in mgd (from Table 2)
2
Industrial Parcels
Tributary to Senior 0.275 mgd
Center ADWF
Calculated ADWF in mgd (from Table 1)
2
Industrial Parcels
Tributary to Senior 0.400 mgd
Center PDWF
Calculated PDWF in mgd (from Table 2)
3
Original Calculations
for Industrial Park
Parcels Upstream of
LS Not Contributing
to Senior Center
Main ADWF 1
138 acres Buildout area contributing to El Fuerte LS (all Industrial Park except senior center)
24% Coverage Building footprint vs. land use area for single story building
43,560 sqft/acre Conversion acre to square feet
1,447,438 Building sqft Calculated building area for single story buildings
0.08 gpd/sqft Flow factor for Commercial/ Industrial land use from 2012 Sewer Master Plan
115,795 gpd Calculated flow (gpd/sqft* Building sqft)
0.116 mgd Calculated flow in mgd (included in model)
3
Updated Calculations
for Industrial Park
Parcels Upstream of
IS Not Contributing
to Senior Center
Main ADWF 1
138 acres Buildout area contributing to El Fuerte IS (all Industrial Park except senior center)
50% Coverage Building footprint vs. land use area for single story building
43,560 sqft/acre Conversion acre to square feet
3,015,495 Building sqft Calculated building area for single story buildings
0.08 gpd/sqft Flow factor for Commercial/ Industrial land use from 2012 Sewer Master Plan
241,240 gpd Calculated flow (gpd/sqft Building sqft)
0.241 mgd Calculated flow in mgd (included in model)
3 Industrial Park
Parcels PDWF
1.45 -- Peaking factor for PDWF based on diurnal pattern in model (10:00 am)
0.351 mgd Calculated PDWF (PF*ADWF)
1+2+3 Total ADWF 0.536 mgd Senior Center ADWF + Tributary ADWF
1+2+3 Total PDWF 0.776 mgd Senior Center PDWF + Tributary PDWF
1+2+3 RDII Loading 0.013 mgd Wet weather inflow in model for area tributary to El Fuerte IS
1+2 +3 Total PWWF 0.790 mgd Total PDWF + RDII Loading
1+2 +3 El Fuerte Lift Station 970 gpm Capacity of duty pump (IS also has identical standby pump) from 2012 Sewer Master Plan
1.40 mgd Capacity of duty pump in mgd
Note 1: Industrial flows originally In model based on 24% coverage. Flows were updated based on 50% coverage for this analysis.