HomeMy WebLinkAboutMS 15-11; GARFIELD CUSTOM BEACH HOMES; HYDROLOGY STUDY FOR 3806 GARFIELD STREET, CARLSBAD, CA; 2016-04-04v. •' ••r:"U
-
-
lnital Date
HYDROLOGY STUDY
FOR
3806 Garfield Street, Carlsbad, CA
Grading Permit / Parcel Map
PUD 15-17 I SDP 15-16 / MS 15-11 / CDP 15-34
.4 CITY OF CARLSBAD, CA
PREPARED FOR:
RINCON REAL ESTATE GROUP, INC.
1520 N. EL CAM1NO REAL, UNIT 5
SAN CLEMENTE, CA 92672
(949) 637-3354
PREPARED BY:
PASCO LARET SUITER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
535 N. HIGHWAY 101, SUITEA
SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075
(858) 259-8212
RECEIVED
APR 05 2116
LAND DEVELOPMENT
ENGINEERING
Prepared: January 8, 2016
Revised: February 25, 2016
Revised: April 4, 2016
G. LAWSON, RCE 80356 DATE
PLSA Job #2319
535 N. Hwy 101, Suite A
Solana Beach, CA 92075
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
Executive Summary 1.0
Introduction 1.1
Existing Conditions 1.2
Proposed Project 1.3
Conclusions 1.4
References 1.5
Methodology 2.0
Introduction 2.1
County of San Diego Criteria 2.2
Runoff Coefficient Determination 2.3
Hydrology & Hydraulic Model Output 3.0
Pre-Developed Hydrologic Calculations (100-Year Event) 3.1
Post-Developed Hydrologic Calculations (100-Year Event) 3.2
Pipe Analysis Results and Discussion 3.3
Appendix 4.0
Isopluvial Maps
Intensity Duration Design Charts
Runoff Coefficients
Overland Flow I Initial Time of Concentration
Hydrologic Soil Group - USDA Web Soil Survey
Pre-Development Hydrology Node Map
Post-Development Hydrology Node Map
6-in PVC Pipe Capacity / Channel Report
3-in PVC Pipe Capacity / Channel Report
PLSA Job #2319
535 N. Hwy 101, Suite A
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Page 1 of
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 Introduction
This Hydrology Study for the proposed development at 3806 Garfield Street has been
prepared to analyze the hydrologic and hydraulic characteristics of the existing and
proposed project site. This report intends to present both the methodology and the
calculations used for determining the runoff from the project site in both the pre-
developed (existing) conditions and the post-developed (proposed) conditions produced
by the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year, 6-hour storm.
1.2 Existing Conditions
The subject property is located along Garfield Street, at the intersection of Garfield Street
and Hemlock Avenue, in the City of Carlsbad. The site is bound by existing residential
developments to the south and east of the property, Garfield Street to the west, and
Hemlock Avenue to the north of the property. The existing site consists of an existing
residence, driveways, and associated improvements. The project site is located in the
Agua Hedionda Hydrologic Area, and, more specifically, the Los Monos Hydrologic
Sub-Area (904.31).
The existing site can be categorized into one drainage basin, and primarily drains from
the southwest to the northeast corner of the site and out to Hemlock Avenue. Existing
curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements along Garfield Street and Hemlock Avenue
prevent any offsite drainage from entering the parcel to the west and north. Existing
residential properties to the south and east prevent cross lot drainage from passing
through the site. The existing drainage basin has an approximate area of 0.15 acres and is
approximately 25% impervious. Per the Web Soil Survey application available through
the United States Department of Agriculture, the basin is generally categorized to have
group B soils. Based on the existing impervious area, a pre-development runoff
coefficient of 0.41 was calculated using the methodology described in section 3.1.2 of the
San Diego County Hydrology Manual and the formula provided therein. Using the
Rational Method Procedure outlined in the San Diego County Hydrology Manual, a peak
flow rate and time of concentration were calculated for a 100-year, 6-hour storm event.
For the existing drainage basin, the peak flow rate for the 100-year, 6-hour storm was
determined to be 0.4 cfs at the point of discharge from the site with a time of
concentration of 5.0 minutes. Refer to pre-development hydrology calculations included
in Section 3.1 of this report for a detailed analysis of the existing drainage basin, as well
as a pre-development hydrology node map included in Appendix A of this report for pre-
development drainage basin delineation and discharge locations.
1.3 Proposed Project (Grading Plan 491-5A)
The proposed project includes the demolition of all existing onsite improvements and the
construction of a 2-unit detached condo map with associated landscaping and hardscape
improvements. Site grading along with road, drainage and utility improvements typical
PLSA Job #2319
535 N. Hwy 1O1 Suite A
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Page 2 of 9
of residential development will also be constructed. The proposed building pad
elevations are 61.3 feet for the westerly unit and 58.6 feet for the easterly unit in an
attempt to match the existing sloping terrain.
In the resulting post-developed condition, runoff can be categorized into one drainage
basin similar to the existing site. The proposed site will be graded so that runoff will
drain from a high point at the southwest corner of the site to the low point in the northeast
corner. Each unit will convey generated runoff through landscaped areas and vegetated
swales. Area drains are proposed along the flow path for each unit leading to
underground storm drain piping in an effort to remove runoff from the surface during
high frequency storm events. 3-inch PVC under drain pipes will discharge runoff
entering the underground system into the existing curb and gutter on Hemlock Avenue.
A storm drain curb inlet located approximately 150 feet east of the project on Hemlock
Avenue will then collect runoff from the curb and gutter and direct it to the public storm
drain system. Refer to the project grading plan, drawing 491-5A, for precise grade
information and proposed drainage patterns.
The proposed drainage basin has an approximate area of 0.15 acres and is approximately
59% impervious. The basin has two discharge locations along Hemlock Avenue and can
be further separated into two sub-drainage basins: Basin A with an approximate area of
0.07 acres and Basin B with an approximate area of 0.07 acres. As in the existing
condition, runoff is prevented from entering the site due to curb, gutter, and sidewalk
improvements along Hemlock Avenue, and the neighboring residential developments to
the south and east. Based on the proposed impervious area, a runoff coefficient of 0.64
was calculated using the methodology described in section 3.1.2 of the San Diego County
Hydrology Manual and the formula provided therein. Using the Rational Method
Procedure outlined in the San Diego County Hydrology Manual, a peak flow rate and
time of concentration were calculated for a 100-year, 6-hour storm event. For both
proposed drainage Basins A and B, the peak flow rate for the 100-year, 6-hour storm was
determined to be 0.3 cfs at each discharge location with a time of concentration of 5.0
minutes. The total site runoff generated by sub-drainage Basins A and B was determined
to be 0.6 cfs at the ultimate point of discharge from the site on Hemlock Avenue. This
flow is calculated before onsite LID Source Control BMP's (SC-BMP's) have been taken
into account. Refer to post-development hydrology calculations included in Section 3.2
of this report for detailed analysis of Basins A and B, as well as a post-development
hydrology node map included in Appendix A of this report for post-development
drainage delineation and discharge locations.
In an effort to comply with the City of Carlsbad storm water standards, the proposed site
has incorporated various LID design techniques and site design BMPs to optimize the site
layout while mitigating for the proposed increase in impervious area. Runoff from
proposed roofs and hardscape areas will be directed to landscaped areas and vegetated
swales in an effort to disperse drainage to pervious surfaces. Partial infiltration and
evapotranspiration in self-treating yard landscaped areas will assist in slowing runoff
discharges and in reducing volume generated during storm events. Proposed swales will
PLSA Job #2319
535 N. Hwy 101, Suite A
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Page 3 of 9
remove sediment and particulate-bound pollutants from storm water and will assist in
decreasing peak runoff velocities by increasing the site's overall time of concentration.
1.4 Conclusions
Based upon the analysis included in this report, the proposed onsite increase in peak
runoff as a result of the proposed development does not cause additional impacts to
downstream properties or existing drainage facilities. The increase in runoff will be
mitigated using site design measures outlined in the County of San Diego Model BMP
Design Manual. Similar to the existing condition, the post-developed site will ultimately
discharge directly into the curb and gutter system on Hemlock Avenue. Once in the
gutter, drainage will be conveyed to an existing curb inlet located approximately 150 feet
east of the project boundary, and will enter the buried pipe network. Water will not be
diverted away from existing drainage patterns. The increase in proposed impervious area
and resulting peak runoff will not have an adverse effect on the downstream watershed
since it will be mitigated for onsite. The post-developed site will be exempt from
hydromodification compliance requirements as it is not a priority development project.
1.5 References
"San Diego County Hydrology Manual ' revised June 2003, County of San Diego,
Department of Public Works, Flood Control Section.
"San Diego County Hydraulic Design Manual ", revised October 2012, County of San
Diego, Department of Public Works, Flood Control Section
"City of Carlsbad Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan " adopted January 14,
2011, City of Carlsbad, Engineering Department
"Low Impact Development Handbook - Stormwater Management Strategies", revised
July 2014, County of San Diego, Department of Public Works
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of
Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov.
Accessed July 20, 2015
PLSA Job #2319
535 N. Hwy 101, Suite A
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Page 4 of 9
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 Introduction
The hydrologic model used to perform the hydrologic analysis presented in this report
utilizes the Rational Method (RM) equation, Q=CIA. The RM formula estimates the
peak rate of runoff based on the variables of area, runoff coefficient, and rainfall
intensity. The rainfall intensity (I) is equal to:
I = 7.44 x P6 X D 0645
Where:
I = Intensity (in/hr)
P6 = 6-hour precipitation (inches)
D = duration (minutes - use Tc)
Using the Time of Concentration (Tc), which is the time required for a given element of
water that originates at the most remote point of the basin being analyzed to reach the
point at which the runoff from the basin is being analyzed. The RM equation determines
the storm water runoff rate (Q) for a given basin in terms of flow (typically in cubic feet
per second (cfs) but sometimes as gallons per minute (gpm)). The RM equation is as
follows:
Q=CIA
Where:
Q= flow (in cfs)
C = runoff coefficient, ratio of rainfall that produces storm water
runoff (runoff vs. infiltration/evaporation/absorption/etc)
I = average rainfall intensity for a duration equal to the Tc for the
area, in inches per hour.
A = drainage area contributing to the basin in acres.
The RM equation assumes that the storm event being analyzed delivers precipitation to
the entire basin uniformly, and therefore the peak discharge rate will occur when a
raindrop that falls at the most remote portion of the basin arrives at the point of analysis.
The RM also assumes that the fraction of rainfall that becomes runoff or the runoff
coefficient C is not affected by the storm intensity, I, or the precipitation zone number.
PLSA Job #2319
I 535 N. Hwy 101, Suite
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Page 5 of 9
2.2 County of San Diego Criteria
As defined by the County Hydrology Manual dated June 2003, the rational method is the
preferred equation for determining the hydrologic characteristics of basins up to
approximately one square mile in size. The County of San Diego has developed its own
tables, nomographs, and methodologies for analyzing storm water runoff for areas within
the county. The County has also developed precipitation isopluvial contour maps that
show even lines of rainfall anticipated from a given storm event (i.e. 100-year, 6-hour
storm).
One of the variables of the RM equation is the runoff coefficient, C. The runoff
coefficient is dependent only upon land use and soil type and the County of San Diego
has developed a table of Runoff Coefficients for Urban Areas to be applied to basin
located within the County of San Diego. The table categorizes the land use, the
associated development density (dwelling units per acre) and the percentage of
impervious area. Each of the categories listed has an associated runoff coefficient, C, for
each soil type class.
The County has also illustrated in detail the methodology for determining the time of
concentration, in particular the initial time of concentration. The County has adopted the
Federal Aviation Agency's (FAA) overland time of flow equation. This equation
essentially limits the flow path length for the initial time of concentration to lengths under
100 feet, and is dependent on land use and slope. The time of concentration minimum is
5 minutes per the County of San Diego requirements.
2.3 Runoff Coefficient Determination
As stated in section 2.2, the runoff coefficient is dependent only upon land use and soil
type and the County of San Diego has developed a table of Runoff Coefficients for Urban
Areas to be applied to basin located within the County of San Diego. The table, included
at the end of this section, categorizes the land use, the associated development density
(dwelling units per acre) and the percentage of impervious area.
PLSA Job #2319
535 N. Hwy 101, Suite A
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Page 6 of 9
3.0 HYDROLOGY MODEL OUTPUT
3.1 Pre-Developed Hydrologic Model Output (100-Year Event)
Pre-Development:
Q=CIA
P2=1.2
Pio1.7
Pioo=2.5
Basin 1
Total Area = 6,319 sf 4 0.145 Acres
Impervious Area = 1,594 sf3 0.037 Acres
Pervious Area = 4,725 sf 4 0.108 Acres
Cn, Weighted Runoff Coefficient
- 0.25, Cn value for natural ground, Type B soils
* Per San Diego Hydrology Design Manual (SDHDM) Section 3.1.2
- 0.9, C value for developed / impervious surface
* Per SDHDM Section 3.1.2
Cn = 0.9 x 1,594 sf+ 0.25 x 4,725 sf= 0.41
6,319 sf
Ic = 5.0 Mm (minimum for small areas)
P6 = 2.5
I = 7.44 X P6 x D 05
I = 7.44 x 2.5 x 5.0 0.645 = 6.59 in/hr
Iwo 6.59 in/hr
I2 3.16 in/hr
Iio 4.48 in/hr
Q2 = 0.41 x 3.16 in/hr x 0.145 Ac = 0.19 cfs
Qio = 0.41 x 4.48 in/hr x 0.145 Ac = 0.27 cfs
Qioo = 0.41 x 6.59 in/hr x 0.145 Ac = 0.39 cfs
PLSA Job #2319
535 N. Hwy 101, Suite A
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Page 7 of 9
3.2 Post-Developed Hydrologic Model Output (100-Year Event)
Post-Development (without considering LID treatment):
Q=CIA
P2=1.2
Pio=1.7
Pioo=2.5
Total Area = 6,319 sf4 0.145 Acres
Impervious Area = 3,773 sf 4 0.086 Acres
Pervious Area = 2,546 sf 4 0.059 Acres
Cn, Weighted Runoff Coefficient
- 0.25, Cn value for natural ground, Type B soils
* Per San Diego Hydrology Design Manual (SDHDM) Section 3.1.2
- 0.9, C value for developed / impervious surface
* Per SDHDM Section 3.1.2
Cn = 0.9 x 3,773 sf+ 0.25 x 2,546 sf= 0.64
6,319 sf
Ic =5.0 Mm (mm. for small areas)
P6 = 2.5
I = 7.44 X P6 x D 05
I = 7.44 x 2.5 x 6.59 in/hr
Iioo 6.59 in/hr
I2 3.16 in/hr
Iio 4.48 in/hr
Basin A (House #1 - Runoff at Node 200.3)
Q2 = 0.64 x 3.16 in/hr x 0.073 Ac = 0.15 cfs
Qio = 0.64 x 4.48 in/hr x 0.073 Ac = 0.21 cfs
Qioe = 0.64 x 6.59 in/hr x 0.073 Ac = 0.31 cfs
*At discharge point 1 on Hemlock Avenue
PLSA Job #2319
535 N. Hwy 101, Suite A
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Page 8 of 9
Basin B (House #2 - Runoff at Node 300.3)
Q2 = 0.64 x 3.16 in/hr x 0.073 Ac = 0.15 cfs
Qio = 0.64 x 4.48 in/hr x 0.073 Ac = 0.21 cfs
Qioo = 0.64 x 6.59 in/hr x 0.073 Ac = 0.31 cfs
*At discharge point 2 on Hemlock Avenue
Pre-Development vs. Post-Development (Total Runoff)
Pre-Development Post-Development Delta
Qioo = 0.4 cfs Qioo = 0.6 cfs 0.2 cfs
3.3 Pipe Analysis
The project proposes private storm drain piping and catch basins onsite to remove water
from the surface during storm events. The pipe analysis to appropriately size onsite
storm drains was performed using Autodesk's Civil3D Hydraflow Extension software.
The Hydraflow Extension software has the ability to calculate pipe capacity for open
channel flow, assuming the pipe is completely full, for a given pipe size, material,
roughness coefficient, and slope. The peak flow generated by the 100-year, 6-hour storm
event for each onsite sub-drainage basin was calculated in section 3.2 of this report, and
was determined to be 0.31 cfs at each discharge location.
The onsite storm drain piping for this project i&76-inch PVC ipe sloped at a minimum of
1.0%. 3-inch PVC sidewalk under drains per SDRSD D-27 sloped at a minimum of 2.0%
are also proposed at the point of discharge for each drainage basin. The Hydraflow
Extension software was run for each of these scenarios to determine maximum capacity
when the pipe is full. For 6-inch PVC sloped at 1.0%, the pipe capacity was determined
to be 0.56 cfs, and for 3-inch PVC sloped at 2.0%, the pipe capacity was determined to be
0.13 cfs. Refer to the Appendix of this report for results of the Hydraflow Extension
analysis performed for a 6-inch PVC pipe at 1.0% slope and a 3-inch PVC pipe at 2.0%
slope.
Based on the results of the Hydraflow Extension analysis, a 6-inch PVC drain pipe at a
minimum slope of 1.0% is sufficient to route the post-development peak flow generated
by the 100-year, 6-hour storm event. Two 3-inch PVC sidewalk under drain pipes are
sized to discharge up to the 10-year storm event at each discharge location leaving the
site. The site has been designed to maintain positive drainage from the southwest corner
of each unit to each outlet location so that, in larger storm events, water will flow on the
surface away from proposed structures toward Hemlock Avenue, bypassing the sidewalk
under drain pipes.
PLSA Job #2319
535 N. Hwy 101, Suite A
Solana Beach, CA 92075
Page 9 of 9
4.0 APPENDIX
PLSA Job #2319
535 N. Hwy 101, Suite A
Solana Beach, CA 92075
kn%99 111111,0011hS INS 29111111111111111111111111 Jill 111111 EQUATION ______________________11111111
Intensity (in/hr) IIIIIII
PIS 6-Hour Precipitation ________________________________
oil ___ ' Duration
UUh'III il*i i uihIIh!lthuuI'huhL
iIII1!IIi!!IIi
h!IIIiI!!IIli
monommmalzamn Nonni N..
IN!!IIIIIifl 111111II1 m1III4I!1llH!I1ImIm1ll !IIIIIIIllhII 1111111
IIIIIIIIIiii!!! 11111 jIii IllI ilillItH WUD •••uuiuuuuuuuuuu III P1111111111111111,09111111 Eb2qM .i..uuuuuuiuuuui
UU•IUUIIIuuIIIIUI IllIllIllIlIllIll IIIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIlI!!llhIIIIIIIIIIIII!!IIIIII!iIIiIII!!Uhi!!!
IlIluullIllIuuIll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIh!!UhIIIIIIIIIIhiI!iIIi!!lIl!!fl!!!lI
IlIllIulIllIl101
IN IN I IN 1111111 IIIIIHhIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIii!iIIIIiIII!!IIIiiIiIi
........
...uuuIu ,u, ,u ,I,II....uuuuauII aI,,,,i,uu,I,I,I ....'....u..iI.ui,,.; ON u....uuuui,uuuiui,i,uuuuui.uiu.tuuiuu,uuuuiiiuu ...m..u.u,uuuuuiui
_.... ..... u..uIuuuuIIIIuIuIIuI....uIluIuIIu,uiuuuIIuIlI . MME .•uuuius.:'iiuuiuutI
ZMEMEZZWOMMOMMS
......0 uuuuuuuuuIluuIIuuuIuuuuuuIuuhuuuIuuuIuIuuIIII••••uuu••nuumiiiusuuii uuuuiiiuuiiuuiIiuuuiuUUuiiHuliuuujuuuuuuuuuIiii Em •u•uuu•uiUuuuuiiH!uil ___________......
mm ___________.....I .u.iuuuuiuiiiiiuuiiiuuuuuiuiuuiuiuiiiiiiijiiii..u.uu.u.uiiuiiiiiuuiuuit ___.___..Im.u.i iuullulululflhluulluulluuullihullflhuulluh Ill now .. mom mom llihlllluullulll ••••••••uu•uuuu iuuiuiuuuuiiiiiiuuuiiuiuuuiuniuuiuiuivmiiiiu•••ua.iuuuuiiiniiuuuiuuu
mmmmmmm""",,r ............ Uul I 'ri1111 uuuuuuiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiimuuuuuuuuuuiu 111111111110 ...........I.IuI uuu,uuiiiliulililliiuUiilifluiiililiiiiililiiuUu•UiiiiliuiiluliHullllD ••uu•uuuuuiuiii Iu.luuulllllllulll,IIiuIuIuuuIIIIIIIIIuhIIIIil..u•u.l,..uonhlllullllll
n Ucin rtrnn - iFnwamnim
San Diego County Hydrology Manual Section: 3
Date: June 2003 Page: 6of26
Table 3-1
RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS
Land Use Runoff Coefficient "C"
Soil Type
NRCS Elements County Elements % IMPER. A B C D
Undisturbed Natural Terrain (Natural) Permanent Open Space 0* 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35
Low Density Residential (LDR) Residential, 1.0 DU/A or less 10 0.27 0.32 0.36 0.41
Low Density Residential (LDR) Residential, 2.0 DU/A or less 20 0.34 0.38 0.42 0.46
Low Density Residential (LDR) Residential, 2.9 DU/A or less 25 0.38 0.41 0.45 0.49
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Residential, 4.3 DU/A or less 30 0.41 0.45 0.48 0.52
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Residential, 7.3 DU/A or less 40 0.48 0.51 0.54 0.57
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Residential, 10.9 DU/A or less 45 0.52 0.54 0.57 0.60
Medium Density Residential (MDR) Residential, 14.5 DU/A or less 50 0.55 0.58 0.60 0.63
High Density Residential (HDR) Residential, 24.0 DU/A or less 65 0.66 0.67 0.69 0.71
High Density Residential (HDR) Residential, 43.0 DU/A or less 80 0.76 0.77 0.78 0.79
Commercial/Industrial (N. Com) Neighborhood Commercial 80 0.76 0.77 0.78 0.79
Commercial/Industrial (G. Corn) General Commercial 85 0.80 0.80 0.81 0.82
Commercial/Industrial (O.P. COrn) Office Professional/Commercial 90 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.85
Commercial/Industrial (Limited I.) Limited Industrial 90 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.85
Commercial/Industrial (General I.) General Industrial 95 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87
*The values associated with 0% impervious may be used for direct calculation of the runoff coefficient as described in Section 3.1.2 (representing the pervious runoff
coefficient, Cp, for the soil type), or for areas that will remain undisturbed in perpetuity. Justification must be given that the area will remain natural forever (e.g., the area
is located in Cleveland National Forest).
DU/A = dwelling units per acre
NRCS =National Resources Conservation Service
3-6
San Diego County Hydrology Manual Date: June 2003 Section: 3
Page: 12 of 26
Note that the Initial Time of Concentration should be reflective of the general land-use at the
upstream end of a drainage basin. A single lot with an area of two or less acres does not have
a significant effect where the drainage basin area is 20 to 600 acres.
Table 3-2 provides limits of the length (Maximum Length (LM)) of sheet flow to be used in
hydrology studies. Initial T1 values based on average C values for the Land Use Element are
also included. These values can be used in planning and design applications as described
below. Exceptions may be approved by the "Regulating Agency" when submitted with a
detailed study.
Table 3-2
MAXIMUM OVERLAND FLOW LENGTH (LM)
& INITIAL TIME OF CONCENTRATION (T
Element* DU/
Acre
.5% 1% 2% 3% 5% 10%
LM Tj LM Ti LM TiLM TI LM Tj LM T
Natural 50 13.2 70 12.5 85 10.9 100 10.3 100 8.7 100 6.9
LDR 1 1 50 12.2 1 70 11.5 85 10.0 100 9.5 100 8.0 100 6.4
LDR 2 50 11.3 70 10.5 85 9.2 100 8.8 100 7.4 100 5.8
LDR 2.9 50 10.7 70 10.0 85 8.8 95 8.1 100 7.0 100 5.6
MDR 4.3 50 1 10.2 701 9.6 80 8.1 95 7.8 100 6.7 100 5.3
MDR 7.3 50 9.2 65 8.4 80 1 7.4 95 1 7.0 1001 6.0 1001 4.8
MDR 10.9 50 8.7 65 7.9 80 6.9 90 6.4 1001 5.7 100 4.5
MDR 14.5 50 8.2 65 7.4 80 6.5 90 6.0 100 5.4 100 4.3
HDR 24 50 6.7 65 6.1 1 75 5.1 1 90 4.91 95 4.3 100 3.5
HDR 43 50 5.3 65 4.7 75 4.0 85 3.8 95 3.4 1 100 2.7
N. Corn 50 5.3 1 60 4.5 75 4.0 85 3.8 95 3.4 100 2.7
G. Com 50 4.7 60 4.1 75 3.6 85 3.4 90 2.9 100 2.4
O.P./Com 50 4.2 60 3.7 70 3.1 1 80 2.9 90 2.6 100 2.2
Limited I. 50 4.2 60 3.71 70 3.1 80 2.9 1 90 2.6 100
General 1. 50 3.7 60 3.2 70 2.7 80 2.6 90 2.3 100 t19
*See Table 3-1 for more detailed description
3-12
Hydrologic Soil Group—San Diego County Area, California
467760 467786 4678(XJ 467820 4c794( 407860 4F7Q 467920 467940 467960 167060
330 9 331N
AL
5$Ad
R
R
I * 6
6
4,
01*1
12
INIII
Oil
331 56'N 331 8'56'N ' 0--k
iu 401/80 /8bu 46, , 467980
8:
Map Scale: 1:1,070if printed onA landscape (11"x8.5")sheet.
8: N 0 15 30 60 90
Feet ,\\ 0 50 100 200 300
Map projection: Web Memator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: (JIM Zone 1 1 WG584
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/20/2015
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group—San Diego County Area, California
Hydrologic Soil Group
Hydrologic Soil Group— Summary by Map Unit - San Diego County Area, California (CA638)
Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOl Percent of AOl
MlC Marina loamy coarse B 3.8 100.0%
sand, 2 to 9 percent
slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 3.8 100.0%
Description
Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are
assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the
soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation
from long-duration storms.
The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and 0) and
three dual classes (ND, BID, and CID). The groups are defined as follows:
Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly
wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or
gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission.
Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These
consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained
soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils
have a moderate rate of water transmission.
Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist
chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or
soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water
transmission.
Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when
thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell
potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer
at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material.
These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission.
If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (AID, BID, or CID), the first letter is
for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their
natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes.
Rating Options
Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition
Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified
IJSD Natural Resources Web Soil Survey . 7/20/2015
Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey . . Page 3 of 4
Hydrologic Soil Group—San Diego County Area, California
Tie-break Rule: Higher
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/20/2015
21111111111 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
DE VEL OFMEN T HYDROLOGY AREA CALCULATIONS
- - PROPERTY LINE / BASIN BOUNDARY
EXISTING CONTOUR LINE
___________ • EXISTING FLOWLINE
EXISTING DIRECTION OF FLOW
3806 GARFIELD STREET ONSITE IMPERVIOUS AREA 1,594 SF
ONSITE PER'iIOUS AREA 4,725 SF
Z ONSITE IMPERWOUS AREA 25.2%
TC'62.9O
/
/ /
/
/
/
/
FS=62,9&
/ / FS3,2
IC63.48
FS53.31/
TC62.22 •••;K 1;::/T /
00
4 /
I' H
/
C7 , I
H.
,.
,..
TG/627
FS58,25 APN 204270-0500
TC83.27
TC3.10.......
/
/ .
/
/
/4
PRE-DEVELOPMENT NODE MAP
I "-10'
GRAPHIC SCALE 119 =10'
-
10 0 10 20 30 & ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING + LAND PLANNING + LAND SURVEYING
535 North Highway 101, Ste A, Solana Beach, CA 92075
ph 858.259.8212 1 ft 858.259.4812 1 plsaengineering.com
TC$2.05
' I
\\
\,
\HEMLOCK AVENUE
NODE 200.3.
/ ' • £.'.# '. £. \ .5. TG=60.2 \
S IE=59.2
LEGEND POST DEVEL OPMENT HYDROLOGY AREA CALCULATIONS
ONSITE IMPERVIOUS AREA 3,772 SF
38 06 GARFIELD STREE T ONSITE PERVIOUS AREA 2,547 SF
ZONSITE IMPERVIOUS AREA 59.7%
WEIGHTED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (Cn) 0.64
- - PROPERTY LINE / BASIN BOUNDARY
SUB BASIN BOUNDARY
EXIS77NG CONTOUR LINE
• PROPOSED FLOWLINE
PROPOSED DIRECTION OF FLOW
- — — — - RETAINING WALL
o PROPOSED AREA DRAIN
= = = = = PROPOSED PRIVATE STORM DRAIN
5/
,
.rTC/1
1/
51/
N -
,—NODE 300.3
I (FL=56.3) \
.7 Q100 = 0.31 CFTS
TC55,$3
TC2.62.
APN 204m2700.500
3?
c.i I
TC"63,27
.7, '/ //,'/ •j//! .7 // •' 1 '7 / 1/ ," / .1/. • ." " ,',' /
POST-DEVELOPMENT NODE MAP
1 "=10'
GRAPHIC SCALE 1"=1O'
10 0 10 20 30 PASCO LARET SUITER
& ASSOCIATES
CIVIL ENGINEERING + LAND PLANNING + LAND SURVEYING
535 North Highway 101, Ste A, Solana Beach, CA 92075
ph 858.259.8212 I ft 858.259.4812 I plsaengineering.com
PLSA 2319
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® AutoCAD® Civil 31341) by Autodesk, Inc.
6-in PVC @1.0%
Circular Highlighted
Diameter (ft) = 0.50 Depth (ft)
Q (cfs)
Area (sqft)
Invert Elev (ft) = 59.20 Velocity (ft/s)
Slope (%) = 1.00 Wetted Perim (ft)
N-Value = 0.013 Grit Depth, Yc (ft)
Top Width (ft)
Calculations EGL (ft)
Compute by: Known Depth
Known Depth (ft) = 0.50
Tuesday, Dec 29 2015
= 0.50
= 0.561
= 0.20
= 2.86
= 1.57
= 0.39
= 0.00
= 0.63
Elev (ft) Section
60.00
59.75
59.50
59.25
59.00
58.75
0 1
Reach (ft)
0 1.
[4.1SIs
54.75
54.50
54.25
54.00
Channel Report
Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesl) AutoCAD® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Tuesday, Jan 122016
3-in PVC Drain Pipe @ 2% (QIOO)
Circular Highlighted
Diameter (ft) = 0.25 Depth (if) = 0.25
Q(cfs) = 0.125
Area (sqif) = 0.05
Invert Elev (if) = 54.60 Velocity (if/s) = 2.54
Slope (%) = 2.00 Wetted Perim (if) = 0.79
N-Value = 0.013 Grit Depth, Yc (if) = 0.22
Top Width (if) = 0.00
Calculations EGL (if) = 0.35
Compute by: Known Depth
Known Depth (if) = 0.25
Elev (if)
ei.... Dr ....... ei...e ....e u;...........,1 4... .....;...e e... .......e.... ii..ee....i,...................0