Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-07-05; Traffic and Mobility Commission; Minutes Page 1 of 11 Council Chambers 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 July 5, 2022, 4:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER: 4 p.m. ROLL CALL: Perez, Linke, Penseyres, Coelho and Newlands Absent: Proulx and Fowler PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Chair Perez led the Pledge of Allegiance APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Regular Meeting held May 2, 2022. Minutes of the Regular Meeting held June 6, 2022 Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Coelho to approve the minutes for the May 2, and the June 6, 2022, meeting as presented. Motion carried, 5/0/0/2 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx and Commissioner Fowler)) PUBLIC COMMENT: Lynda Daniels requested that staff install a sign telling pedestrians to stay to the right on the multipurpose bike lane between Oceanside and Carlsbad before you get to the traffic circle. She also asks that the city put more effort into maintaining this bike lane. Scott Hansen, a Representative of the San Diego Mountain Biking Association brought forward the information that the San Diego Mountain Biking Association strongly disagrees with one aspect of the e- bike ordinance. The statement about dismounting the regulated mobility device where the trail width is less than five feet, or a pedestrian or equine is within a distance of 50 feet from the regulated mobility device. This will create trail user conflicts. There are a lot of great programs for reducing trail user conflict and the San Diego Mountain Bike Association would like to partner with Carlsbad to find a solution to this problem. CONSENT CALENDAR: None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS: 1. POLICE REPORT REGARDING TRAFFIC & MOBILITY RELATED MATTERS DURING THE MONTH OF JUNE 2022 – (Staff Contact: Lieutenant Jason Jackowski, Police Department) Staff’s Recommendation: Receive a presentation Lieutenant Jackowski presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) Commissioner Coelho inquired about the bicycle officer who is working full time for e-bike enforcement and if this position will continue after summer season. Page 2 of 11 Lieutenant Jackowski replied that the E-bike officer will return to his normal position as a school resource officer when school starts up again in mid-August. We will evaluate the situation to see if this is a full time position that is needed. Commissioner Penseyres asked about the sign located southbound on coast highway that states that bicycle enforcement is ahead. What type of enforcement was being done in this location? Also, why this location? Lieutenant Jackowski said it was all types of bicycle enforcement and was to highlight what the e-bike enforcement officer had been doing. He is writing citations and providing education. This sign gets moved around a lot and is usually somewhere on Carlsbad Boulevard. Vice-Chair Linke asked about the 40 citations that were issued, and what portion are opting for the educational program? Lieutenant Jackowski said he does not have that information, but the education program was not running the entire time that the citations were given. It is currently up and running now. Chair Perez asked if the E-bike officer was using an E-bike himself. Also, is there any funding that is out there right now that we could look into in order to continue this program and build up an E-bike police force? Lieutenant Jackowski replied that the police officer was enforcing the law using an E-bike himself. They did utilize the OTS grant to put together details where they have three or four officers do e-bike enforcement on a weekend instead of just one officer. Chair Perez inquired about the mobile golf carts if they are safe and regulated to carry infant car seat? Lieutenant Jackowski replied that he would have to research this but if the vehicle is lawful to be operated on the roadway and they had an underage child in the vehicle then the child would have to be in a child seat per law. 2. CARLSBAD BOULEVARD RESTRIPING BETWEEN MANZANO DRIVE AND ISLAND WAY, BIKE LANE IMPROVEMENTS AT FIVE LOCATIONS ON CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND THREE SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY PLAN BIKE ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS – Receive a presentation and provide direction to staff regarding Carlsbad Boulevard Restriping between Manzano Drive and Island Way, bike lane improvements at five locations on Carlsbad Boulevard (CIP Project No. 6096), and Three Sustainable Mobility Plan Bike Enhancement Projects - La Costa Avenue at the intersections of Piraeus; Saxony and El Camino Real, (CIP Project No. 6101); Jefferson Street between Las Flores Drive and I-5 Overpass, (CIP Project No. 6100); and Paseo Del Norte and Cannon Road intersection, (CIP Project No. 6095). (Staff Contact: John Kim and Miriam Jim, Public Works) Staff’s Recommendation: Receive a presentation and provide input to staff PUBLIC COMMENT: Jack Kubota thanked the Commission for their services and requested that staff consider enhancing the safety of the bicyclists along Carlsbad Boulevard and Avenida Encinas. Page 3 of 11 Commissioner Newlands asked about the picture of the bike lane on Carlsbad Boulevard which shows pedestrians with no sidewalk. Will this stay this way? City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that this is an interim project and Transportation Director Tom Frank will present a more permanent solution that will address the multi-modal issues in more detail. This is a striping only project that we can implement quickly. Commissioner Newlands asked about the lane reduction on Solamar Drive and Island Way, the table showed at peak time this would decrease the service for vehicles and then later it said there will be no real effect. Which is the case? City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that they have implemented a lane reduction in the past in this location for bad weather events and other issues. Based on the data from those incidents they don’t think the volume will be an issue with the lane reduction. Senior Engineer Jim added that the little to no impact of the lane reduction is specific to the signalized intersections and the area between the two intersections. The number of lanes at the intersection itself will remain two lanes. Commissioner Coelho inquired about the timeframe for completing the striping project. City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that the restriping project will be done within the 12-month period of when it begins construction. Commissioner Penseyres inquired about westbound Cannon Road at Paseo Del Norte and whether we may use a bike box in this location. This would help cyclists line up with the sharrows in the middle lane. They could get a head start with the bike box and this could be a great enhancement. City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that this could be easily incorporated but they need to research when you would implement a bike box. We wouldn’t want to put one in where usage would not be high. We want vehicles to respect the box where there is high level of activity of cyclists in that location. Vice-Chair Linke brought up area of concern regarding the dashed green bike lanes. Where there was a dedicated right turn lane to the right, we would make the solid green bike lane to the left of that. If there was a conflict through an intersection, we would dash the line through the conflict zones. In the past we have declined the recommendation to put the dashed green line where there is a shared right turn and bike lane because drivers might be reluctant to enter there. There are many instances in all these projects where we are changing the unwritten rule and he wants to use whatever is safest. Vice-Chair Linke also inquired about the elimination of parking on Jefferson Street and asked if many people use those spaces. Is there an alternative to this parking? Senior Engineer Jim responded that there are more parking demands on the west side of Jefferson Street than the east side. Based on observations there will not be a large issue with parking. Public notice will be given before the project is implemented. Page 4 of 11 Vice-Chair Linke asked if there is a target speed limit that we are looking to get to on southbound Carlsbad Boulevard. The current speed limit is 50 mph, and he inquired if this speed limit go down with reducing the travel lanes. City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that they don’t have a target speed limit but typically with a significant siding and striping project we will conduct a speed survey. If the speed survey shows that the speed limit needs to be reduced, we will propose an adjustment. Vice-Chair Linke brought up that the traffic study was done in 2021 during Covid-19, where the traffic count would be lower. The pre-covid number was a lot higher. If we eliminate a lane we could run into a lot of issues if traffic volume resumes to where it was pre-covid. City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that they are aware that the level of service analysis pre-covid was higher. Our recommendation will stay the same for this project. The observation of this closure was pre- covid along this stretch and we didn’t see any traffic operation issues during these closures. Motion by commissioner Coelho, seconded by Commissioner Newlands to include the following comments: • Staff shall provide notification to residents on Jefferson Street north of Las Flores informing them of the removal of on-street parking on the east side of Jefferson Street • Staff shall ensure that the traffic study for the improvements on Carlsbad Boulevard include analysis of pre-COVID traffic conditions • After implementation of the proposed improvements on Cannon Road at Paseo Del Norte, staff shall review the project for potential implementation of a bike box at the westbound approach of Cannon Road • After implementation of the proposed improvements on Carlsbad Boulevard staff shall evaluate options to reconfigure the parking lot north of Island Way to accommodate the maximum number of vehicles Motion carried: 5/0/0/2 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx and Commissioner Fowler) 3. PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF THE SOUTH CARLSBAD BOULEVARD CLIMATE ADAPTATION PROJECT– Receive a report from staff regarding the Preliminary Conceptual Design of the South Carlsbad Climate Adaptation Project and the results of the public outreach effort; and, 1. Receive public comments 2. Discuss and provide comments to staff on the three design options identified in the presentation 3. Consider supporting staff’s recommendation to City Council to approve Option 2 as the preferred option for the preliminary conceptual design of the South Carlsbad Boulevard Climate Adaptation Project (Staff Contact: Tom Frank and Katie Hentrich, Public Works) Staff’s Recommendation: Receive the report and support staff’s recommendation to City Council to approve Option 2 as the preferred option for the preliminary conceptual design of the South Carlsbad Boulevard Adaptation Project. Transportation Director Frank and Senior Program Manager Hentrich presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) Page 5 of 11 PUBLIC COMMENT: Bill Canepa of the Hilton Garden Inn on Solamar Drive feels the process is rushed and asked for the City to take more time to publicly vet the project. He also expressed concerned about the roundabout at Solamar Drive and concerned about construction issues. He asked with the decision matrix is there consideration for adjacent property owners. He suggested that staff gather more resident’s input before going in front of City Council. Jim Davidson, the president of the Solamar Homeowners Association shared Mr. Canepa’s concerns and sexpressed concern about the roundabout at Solamar Drive. The intersection serves both the hotel driveway and the senior citizens who live on Solamar Drive. He looks forward to continuing conversations to do the right thing to do at the “Solamar Drivway”. Commissioner Newlands inquired about Option 3, and if this option would enhance the issue that we heard from the public speakers regarding the roundabout? Transportation Director Frank responded that Option 3 is a viable option and that the proposed improvements are outside of the coastal hazard zone. The reason why this option did not exceed Option 2 was because of the other benefits of the roundabout at Solamar Drive. A roundabout provides additional pedestrian pathways on the southerly side of the intersection but also on the northern side. It also provides shorter crossing distances for the travel lanes. The roundabout also that drivers slow down while going through the intersection. With Option 3 there would also be a pedestrian signal at the intersection. Option 3 is a viable option but did not rank as high as Option 2. Commissioner Coelho asked about when the public input on these options were collected. Transportation Director Frank replied that there was an extensive public outreach process and that was shown in exhibit number one. That input was included in the key issues in the options analyses. Commissioner Coelho inquired if it was noted how many people are taking the left turn into Solamar Drive. Transportation Director Frank replied that staff do not have the traffic data study at this time. Commissioner Coelho inquired about the approximate timeline between now and when the first shovel would hit the ground. Transportation Director Frank responded that what is driving the schedule is the deadline for the completion of the study, which is February of 2023. We do not have a timeline for when this would go to a final design or environmental studies. This will depend on the City Council future action. Commissioner Penseyres comments about the 24 hour counts for the vehicles. He thinks that we should note that the bicycle counts are 13 hour counts instead of 24 hours. He has observed that there are a huge number of e-bikes now that ride on Carlsbad Blvd. after dark. There are as many bicycles now as vehicles. He suggests that we should extend the bicycle count to 24 hours. Commissioner Penseyres inquired if the sharrows could be used at the beginning, middle and end of the roundabout, could they be added all through the roundabout. He expressed problems when bicyclist Page 6 of 11 ride to the right and cars pass them in the roundabout and this should be addressed during the design of the roundabout. The level of service for motorists is different for traffic lights versus roundabouts. For example, a traffic light intersection will not fail until the average delay is 80 seconds. A roundabout will fail with an average delay of 55 seconds. This is important as they help people understand that we are not always comparing apples to apples when talking about level of service. Commissioner Penseyres supports the proposed wide Class I and mentioned that we should address induced demand on Carlsbad Boulevard before we go in front of City Council. Vice-Chair Linke asked if the design of this project will influence the remainder of the project on Carlsbad Boulevard. He commented that the city should have an uniform appearance on Carlsbad Boulevard. Transportation Director Frank responded that this design is only for this segment of Carlsbad Boulevard. Any future segments will be a separate project with their own public outreach effort. Vice-Chair Linke supports roundabouts and has some concerns about roundabouts. Bicyclists have to merge into the roundabout with vehicle traffic and is not sure about the comfort level of pedestrians and bicyclists. He wants to make sure we provide clear information to cyclists regarding the need to merge or use the sidewalks to bypass the roundabout instead. He likes the concept of roundabouts and improving traffic flow by using roundabouts. He also commented on the vehicle volumes and concern regarding capacity of the roadway. He believes a formal capacity study needs to be done and that he doesn’t feel they can support an option without the formal study. Is it possible to have this study conducted, and then come back to the commission before going to City Council? Transportation Director Frank responded that cyclists will have the option to enter the roundabout along with vehicle traffic or exit via the ramps and to use the sidewalk area which in the roundabouts will actually be a shared pathway. For this segment of the sidewalk between the two ramps it will be a shared pathway which will be much wider than a sidewalk. For option number 2, in this cross-section there will be a buffered bike lane on the outside which is used for high-speed bicyclists and e-bikes. The lower speed cyclists and pedestrians on skateboards, with strollers, etc. will use the class 1 bike lane. We need both of these spaces in this area to accommodate both types of transport. We don’t want to mix the high-speed cyclists with families. All of the options will provide increased capacity, but the single lane roundabouts are the most efficient. There is a lot of data on single lane roundabouts and that data shows that they can easily handle 20,000 – 25,000 average daily trips. With the option number 2 implementing roundabouts, it might create more capacity than what we actually have today. Vice-Chair Linke asked if we can see these options again after the most recent traffic study is completed. He also supports active transportation improvements along Carlsbad Blvd. considering the high demand along the coastline, and he is also concerned about congestion. Transportation Director Frank replied that there will not be enough time for the traffic study to come back to the commission before we need to present our options to City Council to complete the study. However, the 30 percent conceptual design will include the traffic study and that will come back in front of the commission. Page 7 of 11 Chair Perez expressed his concerns regarding construction impacts to adjacent businesses and emergencies services. Transportation Director Frank replied that the city street designs always address the impact on emergency services and that our emergency services departments will be reviewing the options and ultimately the 30% design in detail. Chair Perez inquired if it is possible to create an advisory committee specifically for this project? This is a big project that will reshape Carlsbad. The advisory committees have been enormously beneficial in the past. Transportation Director Frank responded that there may be a timing issue on what we can do before we complete this study. Commissioner Coelho asked about the timeline and reiterates that the goal is to create a schematic design. Can we still make changes off of this concept based on comments from City Council and other commissions? The entire Carlsbad Boulevard segment should be looked at holistically and it should flow. Transportation Director Frank replied that as we get into further development of the design, we can address any concerns that come up and bring it back to the commission. There is some leeway moving forward with the conceptual design. Commissioner Coelho asked why staff is leaning toward option number 2 instead of option number 3. Transportation Director Frank responded that it was based on the rank showing on the staff report. Both option 2 and option 3 were very close in ranking. Commissioner Coelho inquired if the proposed change from Option 2 to Option 3 mentioned in the staff report is due to erosion control. Transportation Director Frank answered yes. Vice-Chair Linke asked if this project will go to a public vote since the budget will exceed the $1M Prop H limit? Transportation Director Frank said that it is too early to address this issue, but if it needs to go for a vote than it will go to a vote. This issue would be determined at a later date. Vice-Chair Linke said that he is not ready to vote in any of the options due to the lack of a traffic impact analysis study and the points here are very subjective and arbitrary. He expressed that the congestion factor should possibility have more weight in rating of the options. Commissioner Coelho asked about why we are working on the roadway and intersections that are outside the coastal hazard zone. Page 8 of 11 Transportation Director Frank replied that we need to re-align the road and the intersection because the entire existing southbound vehicle travel lane is within the coastal hazard zone within the study limits. Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Newlands to include the following comments: • Recommended that sharrows be provided within the inscribed circle of the roundabouts • The traffic impact analysis results should be provided to the Traffic & Mobility Commission for review prior to going to City Council • The shared use paths around each roundabout shall be constructed of concrete and not decomposed granite • Recommended that City Council form an advisory committee for further review of the South Carlsbad Boulevard project Motion carried: 5/0/0/2 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx and Commissioner Fowler) Commissioner Penseyres moved to approve staff’s recommendation. No second received and motion did not pass. Commission Coehlo commented that he supports the project however he feels the commission need to review a traffic study associated with the options. He also commented that he rides on Carlsbad Blvd on the north part of the city and he much prefers the improvements and not having to wait at traffic signals. Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Coelho requesting that a Special Traffic & Mobility Commission meeting shall be convened on Aug. 18, 2022, to review the results of the traffic impact analysis and alternatives analysis. Motion carried: 5/0/0/2 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx and Commissioner Fowler) 4. UPDATE ON TAMARACK AVENUE AND VALLEY STREET PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL PROJECT – Receive d presentation regarding the Tamarack Avenue and Valley Street Pedestrian Signal Project and provide input to staff. (Staff Contact: John Kim and Lindy Pham, Public Works) Staff’s Recommendation: Support staff’s recommendations. City Traffic Engineer Kim and Associate Engineer Pham presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the office of the City Clerk) PUBLIC COMMENT: Tim Morgan requested that staff stop the project because of the many issues and address the speed problems. He has gained 100% consensus of all residents who live around the area of Valley Street and Tamarack Avenue. He requested more community involvement to look for alternatives. Jason Oziel commented on the lack of public input on the design of Tamarack Avenue and Valley Street crosswalk improvement. Please stop this project and start addressing the speed issue. Jean-Marc Dumouchez commented on the speed problem on Tamarack Avenue and suggested that staff consider a roundabout on Tamarack Avenue and James Street. Jim Young commented on the design implementation of the crosswalk of Tamarack Avenue and Valley Street that in his opinion if over engineered and does not solve the speeding problems. Page 9 of 11 Michael Zepeda commented on the lack of public input on this project and requested that staff consider reevaluating the hybrid signal installation at the crosswalk of Tamarack Avenue and Valley Street. Commissioner Newlands mentioned that he went out and looked at the site and agrees with the public commenters and their suggestions. Commissioner Penseyres commented that he has been at this location many times as a cyclist and does not see any issues with the intersection itself. Vice-Chair Linke commented that he also went to the site and met with some of the public commenters. The three issues he noticed are the Bulb-Outs, the diameter of the signal post and the third is making an exception to the residential traffic calming program to get what the residents want. How can we reduce the amount of encroachment that cars have to take to get around the Bulb-Outs? City Traffic Engineer Kim said that staff will look at the curb extension. The rubbing itself on the curb does not cause concern as sometimes drivers don’t pay attention and rub their tires on that. Staff can look specifically at the Valley Street to Tamarack Avenue turn to make sure that larger vehicles such as the school bus have room to make the turn without entering into the opposing lane. Vice-Chair Linke asked if the residents have to submit an application for the residential traffic management program? City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that staff will move forward with the traffic calming study. Vice-Chair Linke mentioned that a raised crosswalk has been suggested as well as a roundabout. He is also concerned about the diameter of the signal pole and the lack of communication that he heard from the residents. City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that the diameter of the signal is determined by the length of the mast arms that are going to be placed on the signal pole. The Communication department post information on the website informing the residents of the coming up project, and letters were sent to addresses in that area. Construction Management and Inspection Department notified us that the door knockers were given to all nearby houses as well. Staff will communicate better during the design phase. Chair Perez asked if there were any communications to the community about the agenda item for this meeting? Also, were there any changes on the construction plans or blueprints regarding the design of the signal poles. City Traffic Engineer Kim responded yes, the public were notified that this agenda item would be heard at tonight’s meeting. There were not any changes on the blueprints regarding the signal poles. Vice-Chair Linke made the recommendation to City Council that they direct staff to expedite a traffic calming program around that intersection to include looking at Bulb-Outs and Hawk signal. Commissioner Coelho expanded on the recommendation to include not just that intersection, but up the hill as well. Page 10 of 11 City Traffic Engineer Kim said that the traffic calming process works best where there are single family homes fronting the street. He recommended the portion of Tamarack Avenue on either side of Valley Street where single-family homes are present. So, from Skyline Drive to Adams Street. Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Coelho to: • Recommend to City Council that they direct staff to expedite a residential traffic calming program on Tamarack Avenue from Skyline Drive to Adams Street. • • And to address the residents’ concerns on the newly installed Bulb-Outs and HAWK signal at the intersection of Tamarack Avenue and Valley Street. Motion carried: 5/0/0/2 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx and Commissioner Fowler) 5. TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 WORKPLAN– Review and approve the final Fiscal Year 2022-23 Traffic and Mobility Commission Workplan and appoint a commissioner to represent the Traffic and Mobility Commission at the City Council meeting where the Work Plan will be presented for City Council consideration. (Staff Contact: Nathan Schmidt, Public Works) Staff’s Recommendation: Approve the Work Plan and appoint one commissioner to represent the Traffic & Mobility Commission at a City Council meeting. Vice-Chair Linke asked if the communications plan was included and if there were any changes. Transportation, Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt replied that there were no changes to the communication plan. Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Coelho to approve the FY 2022-23 Traffic & Mobility Commission Work Plan and nominated Chair Brandon Perez to represent the commission at the City Council meeting on Aug. 16, 2022. Motion carried: 5/0/0/2 (Absent: Commissioner Proulx and Commissioner Fowler) CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER COMMENTS: Transportation, Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt commented that the August Traffic and Mobility Commission meeting is undetermined at this time, but they will let the commission know once it is confirmed whether we need to cancel or postpone the meeting due to the remodel of the Council Chambers. TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION COMMENTS: Commissioner Coelho commented that the appointments of many of the commissioners will expire at the end of the year. He suggested that at the next meeting they should discuss a different rotation schedule so that the appointments of six commissioners don’t end at the same time. Commissioner Coelho asked about public comments on non-agenda items. How are those filtered out? City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that all public comments that are addressed to the commission are forwarded to the commission whether it is an agenda item or not. Transportation Director Frank said that staff follow up with email communication if they are given an email address. We can include the comments in City Traffic Engineer Kim’s report when they are relevant. Page 11 of 11 Commissioner Coelho inquired about Plum Tree and the public comments received in that area. City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that staff continue to work with the requests. There are some studies that are outstanding and need to be performed when school is back in session. We will determine the speed issue once the speed data is confirmed. Commissioner Coelho asked if staff seek out the businesses and residents who live in a very specific area like the Solamar residents and businesses. Transportation Director Frank said that they did specifically call and mee with the Hotel personnel and residents in that area. We regularly meet with effected property owners and stakeholders of projects. Commissioner Penseyres inquired about the e-bike rider crash on the class one path. Is there any way that we can track e-bike rider crash on Class I paths? City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that they will have to check with Carlsbad Police and report back. Commissioner Penseyres gave an update on the Local Road Safety Plan, or LRSP, meeting from last week. He learned that the City of Carlsbad will not get a lot of the state funds available from this program because only painting for bike lanes and extra lighting is allowed for competing for these funds. City Traffic Engineer Kim responded that staff will agendize an item on LRSP for a later T&MC meeting and that competing for funds is only one aspect of the LRSP program. Vice-Chair Linke mentioned that we can use the data from the LRSP program to help guide us in identifying problem areas that need to be addressed. Vice-Chair Linke commented that when someone contacts him about an issue, he first directs them to the Transportation Department and that if they are not satisfied with the answer given, they can contact him again and he will submit a question. Vice-Chair Linke talked about the Growth Management Update Citizens Committee that last month was dedicated to water and sewer. Next month meeting will focus on mobility and discuss how to deal with performance standard. Chair Perez praised city workers that he witnessed them helping the residents in need on the road. ADJOURNMENT: Chair Perez adjourned the Traffic & Mobility Commission Meeting on July 5, 2022, at 8:55 p.m. ___________________________ Eliane Paiva, Minutes Clerk