HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-10-15; Planning Commission; ; SP 23G|CDP 97-10 - CARLSBAD CORPORATE PLAZACity of CARLSBAD Planning Department
A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Item No.
P.C. AGENDA OF: October 15,1997
Application complete date: May 9,1997
Project Planner: Christer Westman
Project Engineer: Ken Quon
SUBJECT: SP 23(GVCDP 97-10 CARLSBAD CORPORATE PLAZA - Request for
approval of an amendment to Specific Plan 23 and approval of a Coastal
Development Permit for the redesign of a previously-approved office project at
the southwest corner of Paseo Del Norte and Camino Del Parque in the Planned
Community zone within Local Facilities Management Zone 4.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission adopt Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4184 and 4185
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of Specific Plan Amendment SP 23(G) and APPROVING
Coastal Development Permit CDP 97-10 based on the findings and subject to the conditions
found therein.
II.INTRODUCTION
This proposal includes a request for an amendment to a previously-approved site plan and
architectural elevations for an office project of approximately 75,000 square feet on a 4.59 acre
site. The developer has requested the approval of a new site plan and elevations more attractive
to today's office market. The proposed amendment will increase the aggregate total size of the
buildings by approximately 5,000 square feet.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
Specific Plan 23 was adopted in 1972 for what was then known as Campobello, today the area is
called Altamira. Later that same year an amendment was adopted to expand the Specific Plan
area by 3.05 acres to create a total of 8 acres of Neighborhood Commercial Zoning within the
Specific Plan.
In 1985 SP 23 was amended (SP23E) to include specific development plans for an office
complex on the southern portion of the Neighborhood Commercial 8 acres. The project was
never completed and the property has been purchased by the current owner who has requested
approval of changes to the site plan and building design.
The 1985 approval included three two-story buildings with an aggregate of approximately 70,000
square feet of building and the provision of 282 parking stalls. The site design was a cluster of
the three buildings in the central portion of the site with parking provided along the entire
SP 23(G)/CDP 97-10 CAK^SBADCORPORATE PLAZA
October 15, 1997
Page 2
perimeter. The architectural style was typical of its time with black spandrel glass, gray vision
glass and brick veneer.
The project is subject to the following regulations:
• Specific Plan 23(F)
• Local Coastal Program
IV. ANALYSIS
The recommendation for approval of this project was developed by analyzing the project's
consistency with the applicable policies and regulations listed above. The following analysis
section discusses compliance with each of the regulatory documents utilizing both text and
tables.
A. SPECIFIC PLAN 23(F)
Office use was determined to be appropriate for this site with the adoption of Specific Plan
Amendment SP 23 (E). At that time both a mini-warehouse and an office complex were
approved for the 8 acres of Neighborhood Commercial within the Campobello Specific Plan.
Development standards for the site were established by Specific Plan SP 23 (E) which in essence
is a site plan and elevations. Following the same logic, approval of the proposed amendment
will establish the development standards. The proposal is not inconsistent with typical office
development. The building height is limited to 35 feet at its highest point and setbacks from
property lines are at least 20 feet from side and rear property lines. Parking has been provided at
one space per 250 square feet of gross floor area resulting in 300 spaces.
More at issue is the site and architectural design of the office complex. Following is a
comparison of the proposal with the existing approvals.
General Design
The proposed buildings are a total of 74,866.5 square feet. That is 4,866.5 square feet larger than
the existing approval. As can be seen in Table I, parking is provided with a total of 300 spaces.
Both the existing project design and the proposed project design comply with current parking
requirements.
Although a 35 foot height is allowed, the building height has been reduced with the proposal.
The existing approvals include a building height of 32 feet, while the proposed building height is
30 feet.
SP 23(G)/CDP 97-10 CAk^SBAD_CORPORATE PLAZA
October 15,1997
Page 3
,. . .-;. .-•• : : — : :TABLEI ••;;;;••• : . r •
Project Comparison
STANDARD
Parking
SETBACK:
Altamira side
Freeway side
U-haul side
Paseo del Norte
Camino del Parque
Building Height
EXISTING
282
81 feet
103 feet
78 feet
104 feet
142 feet
32 feet
COMPLIANCE
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes (3 5 feet max)
PROPOSED
300
27 feet
26 feet
20 feet
44 feet
244 feet
30 feet
COMPLIANCE
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes (3 5 feet max)
By reviewing Table I, and not reviewing the site plan, one is left with the impression that the
proposal will bring the buildings much closer to the property lines and the existing residences
within Altamira. However, upon review of the site plan it is shown that the building is moved to
the north and northwestern edges of the site which are the furthest distances from any of the
Altamira residences. Of the fourteen residences along the south property line and the six along
Camino del Parque, 17 will enjoy a much greater separation from the proposed buildings, one
will be equally affected and two will be brought closer than previously to the proposed buildings.
Although this may seem like a negative impact, one still has to consider the fact that the
buildings will in no case be closer than 80 feet and the building is no taller than 30 feet. Physical
compatibility will not be an issue with regard to the buildings.
Circulation
An issue has been raised as a concern of residents within the Altamira development. The
proposal includes an open access point to the project from Camino Del Parque. The existing
approvals have a circulation design which depends on a single point of access off of Paseo Del
Norte and an emergency access point off of Camino Del Parque. Staff has required the
additional open access point on Camino Del Parque because a single point of access will be too
great of a burden on a project which is anticipated to have an ADT of 1,500. The residents prefer
the existing design which prevents daily traffic from using Camino Del Parque.
Views
The City does not have a view preservation policy, and in this instance there are no existing
views enjoyed by the residents of Altamira adjacent to the project to be impacted.
B.LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
The site is located within the Mello II segment of the Carlsbad Local Coastal Program. As
shown on the Coastal Development Compliance Table below, the proposed development is in
compliance with all applicable regulations.
SP 23(G)/CDP 97-10 CAiv~SBAD_CORPORATE PLAZA
October 15, 1997
Page 4
.. : •••-^•••••^r-^f^^m^:-:i'-r-:---''':^^^.' -
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE TABLE
LCP Land Use Plan
General Plan
Zoning
Grading Permit Required
Affect agriculture
Affect shoreline
Affect coastal bluffs
Affect coastal access
Hillside Development Permit Required
Native Vegetation Impacts
Impacts to slopes greater than 25%
N (Neighborhood Commercial)
N
PC (SP 23F)
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Review of Required Coastal Findings
1. Conformance with the Certified Local Coastal Program and all applicable policies. The
project is located in the Mello II Local Coastal Program Segment. The project proposes
the construction of an office project within an area designated for commercial
development. The LCP Land Use Plan designates the subject site for N (Neighborhood
Commercial).
The site has not been used for agriculture, is not adjacent to the shoreline nor is it
adjacent to coastal bluffs, and is located east of the 1-5 freeway and therefore will not
affect coastal access.
2. Coastal Overlay Zones. The subject site is not located in a Coastal Resource Protection
Overlay Zone.
C. GROWTH MANAGEMENT
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 4 in the
Northwest Quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by this project and
compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized as follows:
FACILITY
'. ' - -- ' ' ' •
City Administration
Library
Waste Water Treatment
Parks
Drainage
Circulation
IMPACTS
None
None
None
1,500ADT
COMPLIANCE
WITH STANDARDS
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
SP23(G)/CDP 97-10 CAi^SBADCORPORATE PLAZA
October 15,1997
Pase 5
FACILITY
Fire
Open Space
Schools
Sewer Collection System
Water Distribution System
IMPACTS
None
COMPLIANCE
WITH STANDARDS
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
This project is in compliance with the requirements of Local Facilities Management Zone 4.
V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The development project was previously reviewed and approved. The physical impacts of the
project were reviewed under a previous approval. A Negative Declaration was issued for SP
23(E) in October 1984 for an office development on the site. The Planning Director has
determined that this project is within the scope of the previous environmental review. Based on
the Initial Study, this project will not have any impacts not already addressed. Therefore, a
notice of Prior Compliance was issued by the Planning Director for SP 23(G) July 29,1997.
ATTACHMENTS;
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4184
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4185
3. Location Map
4. Background Data Sheet
5. Disclosure Statement
6. Exhibits A-N dated October 15,1997
PALOMAR AIRPORT RD
CARLSBAD CORPORATE PLAZA
SP23(G)/CDP 97-10
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: SP 23rGVCDP 97-10
CASE NAME: CARLSBAD CORPORATE PLAZA
APPLICANT: Carlsbad Corporate L.L.G.
REQUEST AND LOCATION: Request for approval of a redesign of a previously-approved
office project for an aggregate floor area of 74,688 square feet.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 3 of Parcel Map No. 3415. in the City of Carlsbad. County of
San Diego. State of California, filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County,
January 21. 1975 a file No. 75-014212 of official records.
APN: 211-040-18-00 Acres: 4.59 Proposed No. of Lots/Units: N/A
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation: Neighborhood Commercial
Density Allowed: N/A Density Proposed: N/A
Existing Zone: Planned Community Proposed Zone: Planned Community
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site PC Vacant, NC
North PC Mini-Storage, NC
South PC Altamira, RM
East PC Altamira, RM
West TC 1-5, TC
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: Carlsbad Water District: Carlsbad Sewer District: Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity):
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: April 9. 1997
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued
[ | Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
2<J Other, Categorically Exempt, Section No.
City of Carlsbad
Planning Department
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF DISCLOSURE OR CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS
WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY
APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE
(Please Print)
The following information must be disclosed:
1. Applicant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
Carlsbad Coroorate.LLC.
2. Owner
List the names and addressees of all person having any ownership interest in the property involved.
Carlsbad Corporate, LLC.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names
and addresses of .all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning
any partnership interest in the partnership.
Seaview Pacific Zinc Investment Group
Post Office BOX15163 Post Office Box 14281
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the
names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or
as trustee or beneficiary of the trust.
DISCLOS.FRM 2/96 PAGE 1 of 2
2O75 Las Palmas Drive •Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1 576 - (619) 438-1161
5. Have you had mor han $250 worth of business trans.- »ed with any member of
City staff. Boards, Commisatons, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve
(12) months?
Yes No If yes, please indicate person(s):.
Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club,
fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city
and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or
combination acting as a unit." ,^.:_£.™~.,...' -™ _
NOTE: Attach additional sheets if necessary.
Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date
shad Corporatef LLC.
Print or type name of owner
By: Seaview Pacific, LLC.
Its managing member
By: Capital Finance Group
Its Manager
Print or type name of applicant
Disclosure Statement 10/96 Page 2 of 2
FOR ADDTIONAL
NFORMATION REFER TO
SP23 (C)