The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2700 SOCORRO LN; ; CB890269; Permit.,, z 0 ;: C cc C ... (,) Ill 0 C I[ (,) C w 0 .., 5 I w z ~ 0 z 0 ;: ~ z w CL 2 0 (,) .,, ~. w , ~. 0 3 ir O I llereby attlrm that I am licensed under pro,,lalona of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and ProfHalona Code, and my license is In lull force and effect. I hereby affirm INt I am exempt from Ille Contrac• tof's Ucense law lor the l<Mlowmg reason (Set 7031 5 Business and ProlesslOOs COde· Any c,ty 0f county wtuc.r. rt- qmres a permit 10 conslruct. alter. improve, oemol1sh. or repair any structure. prtOf to 11s issuance also requires ~heap- pl1Cant lor such perm,1 10 Ille a ~ned statement that ne rs lttensed pursuant to lhe provIst0ns of !he Conuactor s license Law (Chapter 9 commencing with Sect,on 7000 of Oiv1s1on J of the Business anti Prolesst0ns Codel o, that 1s f!'X· empr rnerelrom and IP'le basis !or lhe anegec e•emphon Any violation of Section 7031 5 by an apphcant tor a perm11 sub· 1ec1s the applicant to a civil penalty of not more lhan hve hun• died dollars ($5001 I I I. as owner ot the pre>perty. or my employees w,tn wages as lhe,r sole compensahon wilt do the work, and lhe strut· lure Is not intended or oltered for sale (Sec 7044 Business and ProfessiOn!i Code The Contractor's Ltcense law does not apply to an owner ot properly who builds or improves !hereon and wM does sucn WOfk himself or througn hjs own employees. provide<! thal such improvements are not intend• ed or ollered tor sale If, however the building or improve-ment Is sold w1thm one year of completton, lhe owner-builder wtll have the burden o1 prCMng lhal he did n01 build or 1m• prove lor lhe purpose of sale) I 1. as owner ol the propeny, am exclusrve1y conIrac11ng Wtth hcensed conllaclors to construct lhe pro,ect (Sec 7044, Business and Prolesst0ns Code The Con1rac1or·s license law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or Im• proves thereon. and who contracts tOJ each pro,ecIs with a conIractor(s) l~ense pursuanl to the Contractor's License Law) n As a homeowner I am ,mprovmg my home, and lhe follow Ing cond1t1ons exIsl. t The work Is being performed p,IOI' 10 sale I I ~ • I t ' ( 2 I have hved m my home lor twelve monlhs poor to complehon of lttts work 3 I have no! clauned lh1s exempllon durmg the 1 lasl three years 0 I am exempt under Sec. ______ • 8 & P C for lh,s reason 0 I hereby aflum that I have a certificate ot consent to sell-insure. or a cert1hcate or Workers· Compensalion In- surance. or a certified copy thereof (Sec 3800. Labor Code) 1 POLICY NO COMPANY :J Copy 1s hied with the cIIy D Certlhed copy is hereby furnished CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION FROM WORKERS. COMPENSATION INSURANCE (Thts section need not be com~eted 1f the permit 1s for one hundred dollars tS100) Of less) D I cenity that m the perto,mance of the work tor which this permit 1s issued. I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Workers' Compen- sation laws of California. NOTICE TO APPLICANT' If, after making this certificate or Exemption. you should become subJect to the Workers· 1 Compensation provisions of the Labo, Code. you must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall I be deemed revoked. 0 I hereby attlrm that there is a construction lending I agency lo, the performance of the work for which !his per-, mit is issued (Sec. 3097. Civil Code} Lender's Name ____________ _ lender's Address ___________ _ USE BALL POINT PEN ONLY & PRESS HARD APPLICANT TO FILL IN INFORMATION WITHIN SHADED AREA AND DECLARATIONS. -----....... -·········-·-········------------·-----·-------······-·--- CARLSBAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION & PERMIT 2075 Las Palmas Dr., Carlsbad, CA 92009-1915 (619) 438-1161 JOB ADDRESS AV, ST.AO. THOMAS BROS NO. I DATE OF APPLICATION' BUSINESS LICENSE # VALUATION PERMIT NUM BER ' -4 -14-vc:i 35; 63;i... .· ~--., ,-c_ _:-'-~-.:· {"(, ( 1!7J ..... ·~/ , . ; ~ ... ' ci> 8YB::>..Ca9 LOT BLOCK I SUBDIVISION I ASSEJso: P~~C§\~;, -/ C CONTRACTOR CONTRACT~S PHONE• ZONE -~/-_., -~~')L OWNER·s NAME I e1-~~C:3~NE A .... _ :r tJe--/L,,,Jtr.J CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS STATE LICENSE NO. BUILDING SO. FOOT AGE . -5~() 7 OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS -Z-,oc ~.re> LN ~A...tLJ&~ GA; Cf2.cro., DESIGNER DESIGNER'S PHONE DESCRIPTION OF WORK . d,,j.. .U..0...-Y, -7~ ~ 6192 04/14/89 0001 01 02 ..:>· . .:;; ~, ;;-~ <.-->--V. ,AL 'J(,. ,l.J / ~' DESIGNER'S ADDRESS STATE LICENSE NO. BldPmt 404-0( /,..,J.& ... ✓, F/P F LR ELEV. NO OCC GP EDU i' I, _-,· l STORIES ' vO NO --I CENSUS TRACT 1 PARK ING SPACE I RES UNITS I GRADING PERMIT ISSUED I REDEVELOPMENT TYPE DCC LOAD FIRE SPR -AREA CONST r □ ND vD NO vD NO Not Valid Unwss Machine CertdiM QTY. PLUMBING PERMIT. ISSUE 7 _-So QTY. MECHANICAL PERMIT -ISSUE 15. t>C> SUMMARY/ACCOUNT NUMBER EACH FIXTURE TRAP INSTALL FURN DUCTS UP TO 100.000 BTU ~UILUINb ccnfVII I vv, ·C lU·UU·UU·o«u ~...2..,¥- EACH BUILDING SEWER OVER 100.000 BTU SIGN PERMIT 001 ·810·00-00-8221 EACH WATER HEATER ANO OR VENT BOILER/COMPRESSOR UP TO 3 HP PLAN CHECK 001·810·00·00·8891 -2 '/ EACH GAS SYSTEM I TO 4 OUTLETS BOILER/COMPRESSOR 3 15 HP TOTAL PLUMBING OOi ·810-00·00-8222 - EACH GAS SYSTEM~ OR MORE METAL FIREPLACE ELECTRICAL 001 ·810·00-00-8223 l'7 EACH INSTAL . ALTER, REPAIR WATER PIPE VENT FAN SINGLE DUCT MECHANICAL 001-810·00·00·8224 EACH VACUUM BREAKER MECH EXHAUST HOOOIOUCTS MOBILEHOME 001-810-00-00-8225 WATER SOFTNER RELOCATION OF EA FURNACEtHEATER SOLAR 001 ·810·00-00-8226 EACH ROOF DRAIN t INSIDE I DRYER VENT STRONG MOTION 880·519-92-33 ,_;1,,.... TOT/; L MECHANICAL FIRE SPAINi<LERS 001-810-00-00-8227 TOIAL PLUMBING I IC PUBLIC FACILITIES FEE 320-810-00-00·8740 €tn> BRIDGE FEE 360-810-00-00-87 40 QTY. ELECTRICAL PERMIT · ISSUE QTY. MOBILE HOME SETUP PARK-IN-LIEU (AREA ) NEW CONST EA AMP SWl BKR CAA PORT TIF 312·810·00·00·8835 1 PH 3 PH AWNING LA COSTA TIF 311-810-00-00-8835 EXIST BLOG EA AMP1SWT BKR GARAGE FMF 1 PH 3 PH LICENSE TAX 001 -810-00·00-8162 I REMODEL ALHR PER Cl R CU IT MFF 880-519-92-57 ~. TEMP PCTLE 700 AMPS OVER ZOO AMPS y TEMP OCCUPANCY 130 DAYSI .... ..... ' ' CREDIT DEPOSIT -.C:. tt:1, F ·-? -,, .... c~ • i TOTAL ElECTRICAl I /~. -L TOTAl TOT AL FEES PAY ABLE 1 '1/"7 ~ ! HA.VE CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE COMPLETED APPLICATION AND PERMIT AND DO HEREBY Expiranon e .. ry permtt ,,..,.., by the Bulldlng Ott,c,al under the prov,s,ons oltl,0I * AN OSHA PERMIT IS IIE0UIREO FOR EXCAVATIONS OVER CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT ALL INFORMATION HEREON INCLUDING THE Code shall exptre l)y ltm1tat1on and become null and void If the bu1ld1ng o, work !I° o·· DEEP ANO DEM0UTION OIi CONSTRUCTION OI' DECLARATIONS A.RE TRUE AND~CORRECT AND I FURTHER CERTIFY A.ND AGREE IF A PERMIT 1& autP'lor1zed by auch perm,t 11 not commenced w•thm 180 days from the date .:>f 1uch STRUCTURES OVER l STORES IN HEIGHT pa,m11. or ,I the l:lulldt:;'11 Of worll aulft0<1Zad by such pa,m,1 is --or ISSUED TO COMPLY WITH ALL CITY, COUNlY AND STATE LAWS GOVERNING BUILDING CON aDandoned at any bme I et Ille work 11 commenced for • oeriOCI of 180 -• SfRUCTION. WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT I ALSO AGREE TO SAVE INDEMNIFY AND APPI.ICA"lit:!, SIGNAJPRE • OWNE...s-r' CONTRACTOR 0 APPROVED BY ~~ DATE J KEEP HARMLESS THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AGAINST ALL LIABILITIES. JUDGMENTS, COSTS AND 6 '()-EXPENSES WHICH MAY IN ANY WAY ACCRUE AGAINST SAID CITY IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE ~~2 BY PHONE fJ .1,..,. l~-r ;?J GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT ,. ...... -. a, u::: >, ;;; 0 C. E a, r- 1 ,:) 0 c., i:: <1l -~ C. C. <l: I ..x C a:: 0 1/) 1/) a, 1/) 1/) <l: I ,: 0 di >- a, u C <1l C u::: s C a, a, 0 0 0 a, C. 1/) C J; .s:: ~ ,,... " -'.-':.-. " TYPE DATE INSPECTOR ----: '-""""--• "-"' ----I j ' -es BUILDING I ' . FOUNDATION :'-,... ;r FIELD INSPECTION RECORD REINFORCED STEEL f "' ~l'l~MY ~ REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR'S NOTES MASONRY I I , ' REQ. IF INSPECTOR'S .)f Mee~ r-/J&-{.(;~1/-etL-#p ~MP GUNITE OR GROUT i INSPECTION CHECKED APPROVAL DATE SUB FRAME D FLOOR D CEILING " SOILS COMPLIANCE ~ I 14, /VeeP 1AA-. ~,41_./.J ~ Nd 5" /v.sr~c. SHEATHING D ROOF D SijEAR /1 I ) PRIOR TO FOUNDATION INSP FRAME I .~~-v ?/1 /Yrr' I I STRUCTURAL CONCRETE EXTERIOR LATH I OVER 2000 PSI INSULATION ~ PRESTRESSED -CONCRETE INTERIOR LATH & DRYWALL I "' 7 /11.//11 -/-"' . POST TENSIONED I I CONCRETE I PLUMBING • FIELD WELDING ' ·, D SEWER AND BUCO D PUCO HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS UNDERGROUND D WASTE □,WATER /'I D \o/ATER 7/;;;...111 • ~ SPECIAL MASONRY TOP OUT D WASTE TUB AND SHOWER PAN ' , , ~ GAS TEST : 1-m~/H ~ I PILES CAISSONS D WATER HEATER D SOLAR W~TER , I ELECTRICAL I D ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND d UFFER ROUGH ELECTRIC I 7/;µ';, Ir"' D ELECTRIC SERVICE D TEMP@RARY , , .. \ . : -· r ~ D BONDING D POOL I MECHANICAL I - D DUCT & PLEM., D REF. PIPlt,lG ~ ....... ""-b.~ ~ Js HEAT -AIR COND. SYSTEMS I ' VENTILATING SYSTEMS I p:: )__~'. ~ _,_ • L I -• -• • '....J:l 'r.....11"'. ;-,• ,.,._. -.,. -----... -.. -.. ,__ ,_ ----a ~- CALL FOR FINAL INSPECTION WHEN ALL.APPROPRIATE ITEMS ABOVE HAVE BEEN ltPPROVED. · ----· ---. . . FINAL ' I ,I ,._ • , -\ PLUMBING ' I . ELECTRICAL "" I -i;-;,• .., : MECHANICAL ""· I A -~ q/tt./ffl I '" ... • < ~' • -,- GAS BUILDING I "' I I I SPECIAL CONDITIONS '\. I , DATE: ESGIL CORPORATION._ 9320 CHESAPEAKE DR., SUITE 208 ~D, ~I..-:,[-r( $') SAN DIEGO, CA 92123 (619) 560-1468 QAPPLICANT ION JURISDICTION: (., 'fn 1d t-,13 V':r:G? 'cf:::).W:rl'nl1C HECKER QFILE COPY QUPS QDESIGNER PLAN CHECK NO: SET: I PROJECT ADDRESS : ~2"---''7'-0"'----'-0,___5=..0~C,___C'=-'O"'----"k""'·;. c.0"'---'L=-l\J~•---- PROJECT NAME: ____ 1?,,__-_3_--'-h-~~~\),___· _______ _ D D D D D D The plans transmitted herewith have been corrected where necessary and substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes. The plans transmitted herewith will substantially comply with the jurisdiction's building codes when minor deficien- cies identified ~<=t...o~ are resolved and checked by building department staff. The plans transmitted herewith have significant deficiencies identified on the enclosed check list and should be corrected and resubmitted for a complete recheck. The check The plans plans are list transmitted herewith is for your information. are being held at Esgil Corp. until corrected submitted for recheck. The applicant's copy of the check list is enclosed for the jurisdiction to return to the applicant contact person. The applicant's copy of the check list has been sent to: Esgil staff did not advise the applicant contact person thaTh plan check has been completed. Esgil staff did advise applicant that the plan check has L been completed. Person contacted: Date contacted: __________ T_e_l_e_p_h_o_n_e_#_________ . ~ · REMARKS: G)So1t...S 0::----Po\2..r Sfrvt 1'1 -;,,,.,,__,o 01/BJ?..::D:l:ta-VA-,-o,z. J:,"':::i<,,r..•<a;lc. (?) \:irz..s,.-h...a.JlZ f\..Pm 1 SWJ,QS c.,.._9 'm=-:'112<;!2 So 9fo1z.I7Y\)q. f4,clr2. EttYQ B,c,.,,Lo,2'J' j St"!l:, & • :z.. $1-\:)v..1.S. 6"-1"?.., IE li"l:j0'2. 1$ or:, l:,vr '& \:i:Ovl..-0 ~ '-3 ~ Sf'nvl ,;!( ~ By: ::::r, W\ G,. 11..1::. w,., ,..,.i ESGIL CORPORATION Enclosures:~~~~~tkui=='s,,__ ______ _ Date, 3l'119°J I Jurisdiction Cmus':;,80 Prepared by, s;r:,vv1 □ Bldg, Dept, VALUATION AND PLAN CHECK FEE □ Esgil PLAN CHECK NO , __ B-'---Cj--_z.._c.,_'3_ BUILDING ADDRESS _::z"""-~~o"---"'o~~S~o:c:....=C~G~O'-'-'\~~o"-'L=-'-'1\Jc...'-., ---------- APPLICANT/CONTACT --;,; PHONE NO, BUILDING OCCUPANCY -'"'"\2.--_~'------'('-fhi'-=-D_),__ DESIGNER PHONE ------TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION _ _;V_-_1{...:;._ __ _ CONTRACTOR PHONE ____ _ BUILDING PORTION BUILDING AREA VALUATION VALUE MULTIPLIER L,v ''ilJ r-520 CE., (,;,(_;,00 .... :3 4 -::z.. ,z. 0 I 1)~k:___ ---, i:i-@_ ~-'SD .., r'J IZ. Air Conditionin£ Commercial @ Residential @ Res. or Comm. Fire S'Drinklers @ Total Value '35032 I Building Permit r ee $ __ ~3~2_:5_,_s __ o _________________ _ Plan Check ree $ '2-1 0 1 "2 S $ ---''-----------------------''--------- COM MEN T 5~: ---------------------------- SHEET OF --12/87 A.F. Belfast, Consulting Engineer Mr. Anthony Neylan 2700 Socorro Lane Carlsbad, California 92009 SUBJECT: FOUNDATION EXCAVATION OBSERVATION 2046 Redwood Crest Vista, California 92083 phone: (619) 727-2060 May 12, 1989 Project No. 873111 Proposed Addition to Single Family Residence 2700 Socorro Lane, Carlsbad, California Reference: "Soil Report, Proposed Addition to Single Family Residence, 2700 Socorro Lane ... ," by A.F. Belfast, consulting Engineer, dated December 17, 1987 Dear Mr. Neylan: This letter confirms that we have observed the soil conditions exposed in the footing excavations made for the residential structure under construction. At the time of observation, the excavations were dug to the design depth, and forming and rein- forcement steel were in place. The observations indicate that the bearing soils are as anticipated in the above referenced soil reports. The excavations extend into compacted fill which is considered adequate for the bearing capacity of 1500 lbs/ft2 recommended in the soil report. This opportunity to be of professional service is appreciated. If you have any questions or comments concerning this report, please call at your convenience. ~7/J/~~/ Anthony~ Belfast Registered Professional Engineer No. C 40333 Registration expires 3-31-91 Anthony F. Belfast Professional Engineer 15511 Paseo Jenahiz San Diego, California 92129 \6191672-1945 December 17, 1987 Project No. 873110 Mr. Tony Neylan 2700 Socorro Lane Carlsbad, CA 92009 Subject: Soil Report, Proposed Addition to Single Family Residence, 2700 Socorro Lane, Carlsbad, California Dear Mr. Neylan: As authorized in our recent telephone conversation, this report presents the relults of a soil reconnaissance performed at the subject site. It is understood that the proposed project will involve the construction of a two-story, wood-frame to the existing single f-amily residence. The addition will be ;Located on the southwest side of the existing structure as shown on the following Figure 1, and will include approximately 356 square feet. A brief legal description of the site is Lot 29 of Carrillo Extates, Unit 1, in the City of Carlsbad, California. The proposed building plans prepared by Aft>. Builders, dated October 28, 1987 were reviewed during preparation of this report. The purpose of this report is to provide geotechnical criteria for the site preparation and the design of the proposed structure. The recommendations contained herein are based on a surface reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and professional experience in the general site area. Design values may include presumptive parameters based on professional judgement. SITE DESCRIPTION The site is a roughly trapezoidal shaped parcel which has been graded relatively level during past mass grading operations for the subdivision. The lot is bounded by existing developed residential lots to the north, south, and west, and by Socorro Lane to the east. A descending 2:1 fill slope was constructed along the west property line during grading. The existing 1 <ffiroo-f.lY\ ou c:& l) s e, g \I, O 03(,, CJ3 I '8 'hh I e. w a: ::, 52 u. 0 z ID 0 .., residence is located in approximately the center of the lot. The proposed addition ~s planned for the southwest corner of the existing structure. The area of the proposed addition generally consists of lawn and other minor landscape. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The site is underlain by compacted fill which was placed during mass grading for the subdivision. The boring excavated in the area of area of the addition indicates at least eight feet of compacted fill. The soil observed consisted of mottled yellow- brown, moist, medium dense, very silty, clayey, fine grained sand. The soil is classified as an SM in the Unified Soil Classification. The soil in the exploration appeared to have a generally uniform density through the depth explored. The soils encountered are considered to be suitable to support the proposed structure and are not considered to be detrimentally expansive. Groundwater: Shallow groundwater or groundwater seepage was not encountered in the subsurface exploration. Groundwater is expected to be below the depth of foundation influence in the proposed building area. It should be recognized that excessive irrigation on the project site or on adjacent sites can cause a perched groundwater conditions to develop at some future date. RECOMMENDATIONS General Discussion: No geotechnical conditions were apparent at the site which would preclude the proposed development as planned, provided the recommendations provided herein are complied with. Site constraints which would cause potential construction delays are not expected. The existing fill is considered suitable to support the proposed addition using conventional shallow foundations. To decrease the amount of differential movement that will occur between the addition and the existing structure, a slightly reduced bearing capacity is recommended. In addition, it is recommended that new footings be dowelled into existing, adjacent footings. The following paragraphs provide more specific recomm~ndations which should be followed. §~Qgrade Preparation: Areas to receive structures, pavements, or structural fill should be stripped of any vegetation and highly organic topsoil. The stripped material should not be incorporated into structural fills. Fill_ComEaction: association with optimum moisture All fill and backfill to be placed in site development should be accomplished at near conditions and using equipment that is capable 2 of producing a uniformly compacted product. compaction recommended for fill is 90 percent based on ASTM D1557 (modified Proctor). The minimum relative of maximum density ImEorted_Fill: Fill imported to the site should consist predom- inately of sand. The expansive index of import should not be greater than 30, based on Uniform Building Code Standard No. 29- 2. Except for any highly organic topsoil, the existing site soil is considered suitable for reuse as structural fill. Site_Drainage: The performance of foundations and slabs is highly dependent upon maintaining adequate site drainage both during construction and through the life of the structure. Surface runoff should flow positively away from structures with no areas where ponding occurs. Planters should not channel irrigation water beneath foundations, slabs, or pavements. Roof drain downspouts should discharge at least eight feet from the structure. Foundations: A conventional shallow foundation system, bearing in the existing compacted fills should be suitable to support the proposed structure. Provided the recommendations of this report are complied with, foundations may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 1500 pounds per square foot. Foundations should be at least 12 inches in width and should be founded at least 18 inches below lowest adjacent soil grade. Continuous footings should be reinforced with at least two #4 rebars, placed one at the top of the stemwall and one at the bottom of the footing. The recommendation does not preclude more restrictive criteria of the structural engineer or the governing agency. It is recommended that dowels be installed at locations where new footings will join the existing foundation. Dowels should consist of at least no. 4 bars placed one near the top and one near the bottom. The dowels should be epoxied at least 12 inches into the existing foundation and should extend at least 12 inches into the proposed foundation. Resistance to lateral loads may be derived from a coefficient of friction between the soil and concrete equal to 0.25. Alternat- ively, a passive pressure of 300 pounds per cubic foot may be used for vertical foundation components poured against undist- urbed native soil. It is recommended that foundation excavations be observed by the consultant prior to forming or placing steel do determine that the foundation soil conditions are as expected. ExEaneive_Soil: The on-site soil types encountered are not considered to be detrimentally expansive, and no additional special recommendations are considered necessary for expansive 3 soil mitigation. Settlement Potential: Provided the recommendations of this report are complied with, total settlements for the addition are expected to be less than one inch, and differential settlements are expected to be less than one-half of an inch. It should be recognized that some differential movements will occur between the new and existing structures and that minor stucco or drywall cracks may occur at the jucntions between the two structures. However, because of the granular nature foundation soils, it is anticipated that most of the settlements will occur during the construction stage. On_Grade_Slabs: A conventional on-grade slab is considered suitable for use on site. Design of on-grade slabs may be based on a subgrade modulus of 200 kips per cubic foot. In moisture sensitive areas a capillary beak of 4-inches of crushed rock or ~~§h~g coarse sand should be used, overlain by an adequate vapor barrier. The vapor barrier should be overlain by at least one inch of sand to decrease concrete curing problems. Retaining_~!11~: The active pressure for the prevailing on-site soils may be based on an equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pounds per cubic foot. The active pressure should be used for walls free to yield at the top at least 0.1 percent of the wall height. For walls restrained s-0 that such movement is not permitted, an equivalent fluid pressure of 45 pounds per cubic foot should be used, based on at-rest soil conditions. The above pressures do not consider any sloping backfill, surcharge loads, or hydrostat- ic pressures. If these are applicable, they will increase the lateral pressures on the wall. All retaining wall backfill should be uniformly compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum density, based on ASTM D1557. This opportunity to be of professional service is appreciated. If you have any questions or comments concerning this report, please call at your convenience. ~1~J Registered Professional Engineer No. C 40333 Registration expires 3-31-91 4 APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION A field exploration was performed of December 7, 1987, and consisted of a site reconnaissance, and performing subsurface exploration. Three exploration borings were made at the locations approximately shown on Figure 1. The borings were made using a six-inch diameter, hand auger. The logs of the explorations, describing the materials encountered are presented of the following Figure A-1. Representative samples of the materials encountered were obtained by bulk methods and selected samples were retained for laboratory testing. 5 DATE OBSERVED: 1.2-7-BZ METHOD OF DRILLING: 6 ,, F~/CHr ,40CE,€ LOGGED BY: ,A/"$ GROUND ELEVATION: -LOCATION: ....f.EE ;z::>L".-4.N z >i'.L ,.. 0 ... C w ,... ... ~ 0 w ..J w i,t a: 0 1. w BORING NO. w 0 IXlw Q. a:;: oa.. ""' 2 IL er ..J ~ ::) z w .... .... ... ::) a. < o> IL "' ... ~ "' ...w REMARKS J: ~ ~< ~ ... <!:: ... "' :-= Oz ..J"' Q. "' 0 0"' ..J ~o ll.z DESCRIPTION w < ..J z ::) zW 0 ..J IXl ::) IXl 0 0 -o -o -ISM r/Lt.: YELL'04)-3Rt:JuJN mt:JTTCE.0, cg .1770/J'T, /77EO/L/m .DEAff£,, -S/C:TY, -CL'AYEY JAN.D,, ~7NI: CR-4/,vr,O - -~ 5- - -t><: -.f3CJRINC /ERm/AIA7F.0 /lT c? /'7: 10- - - - 15- z 0 w >i'.L ~ 0 ... ,.. 0 w ..J wt a:o w ... 0 IXl W Q. oa.. BORING NO. w < a: ..J ~ a: ... .... ""' 2 IL ::) z w> .... ... :JQ. < REMARKS J: IL "' ... ~ "' ...w o ... ~ ~< ~ ... <-... "' :-= Oz ..J"' Q. "' 0 Q(/) ..J ~o ll.z DESCRIPTION w < ..J z :, zW Q ..J CD :, CD 0 -o -o 0 - - - - ts- - - - -' 10- - - - 15- - JOB NO.: 8J.31 l0 I LOG OF BORING I FIGURE: /'/-./ APPENDIX 8 LABORATORY TESTING Selected representative samples of soils encountered were tested using test methods of the American Society for Testing and Materials, or other generally accepted standards . A brief description o f the tests performed follows: Particle_Size_Analysis: A particle size analysis was performed ---...in accordance with ASTM D422. The grain size distribution was used to determine presumptive strength parameters used to develop foundation design criteria. The results are provided on the following Figure B-1. 6 c.. 0 m z U S Standard Sieve Opening 1n Inches U.S. Standard Siave Numbera Hydrometer ~ 6 4 3 2 1)\ 1 ¾ Y, 3/8 3 4 6 8 10 14 16 20 30 40 50 70 100 140 200 0 100 I I I 11 I ~._ ~ I I I I I I --~ 90 --\ 10 ~ -\ " 80 \ 20 ' ~ \ 70 \ 30 \ f ;; -\ .,, "' g ii 0 • ► ~ 80 f----. -------\ J --0 :l:J ► ► al --->---~ -----• ?; -4 • !IO I ~ C: 50 3 0 IL r-E u m • ~o c u 40 f------------· ----· --a ~ u CJ) Cl. • -1a L ~ N 30 70 m " - ~ )> ~-z 20 - ~ )> -------r- ~ 10 CJ) ----CJ) 0500 -~-~ --..__._ --•-·-100 -----· -100 50 10 5 1 0.6 0 1 0.05 0.01 0.005 0.001 Grain Size in Millimeters Gravel I Sand Cobbles Silt or Clay I Coarse I f:ine I rn•r .. I M••fo•~ I F;n• . - , DEPTH ,2' -BORING/ LIQUID LIMIT .,, c:> C CLASSIFICATION SM PLASTICITY INDEX :z, ~ DESCRIPTION ~/~~ YE~~ow 8RowN. J■✓~TY ~ C"~AY£Y, r~Nr S/.JND PERCENT PASSING #4' 99. (, "" PERCENT PASSING #200 g.2.5 CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE CITY OF CARLSBAD Plan Check DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVI CES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMAS CARLSBAD , CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 This form shall be used to determine the amount of school fees for a p~oject and t o verify that the project applicant has complied with the school fee requirements. No building permits for the projects shall be issued until the cert ification is signed by the appropriate school district and returned to the City of Carlsbad Building Department. SCHOOL DISTRICT: __ Carlsbad Unified 635 0 Yarrow Drive Ste . A Carlsbad, CA 92009 (438-5710) ___ Encinitas Union Elementary 189 Union Street Encinitas, CA 92024 (944-4306) Project Applicant: :✓/('\ ,.. ,. /· Project Address: I ,, .. ~ , . -RESIDENTIAL: SQ . FT . of living area ,_ ..., SQ . FT . of covered area COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL : SQ . FT. AREA -----\! • (\ P d B { --. (L ;_..._ ../ ,, '--,, ; ----r, ,,1 repare y ----~--------------- San Marcos Unified 270 West San Marcos Blvd. San Marcos, CA 92069 (744-4776) San Dieguito Union High School 625 North Vulcan Encinitas, CA 92024 (753-6491) ... APN: Number of dwelling units SQ . FT. of garage area Date FEE CERTIFICATION (To be completed by the School District) Applicant has complied with fee requirement under Government Code 53080 --- Project is subject to an existing fee agreement Project is exempt from Government Code 53080 Final Map approval and construction started (other school fees paid) Other SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHCOL DISTRICT , / , /. jACILITIES PLANNlllG DATE .,)~L ~~~~r:0:13~ -::?~. ___ -______ ! l.ilACT ~ ~ _'17 --I bef P.ECEIP~eptember , ~~~..2~.J .___ ___ , . -·-·--.. ·-~---·-· .. Residential Fee Levied: $Sd6fl based on ~.25~ sq . ft .@ ;,£..5 Comm/Indus t Fee Levied: $ based on sq . ft.@ ·/} AB 2926 and SB 201 fees are capped at $1 .50 per square foot for res idential. AB 2926 i s capped at $.25 per square foot for commercial/indus trial. DEVELOPMENT PROCESSING SERVICES DIVISION 2075 LAS PALMA$ DRIVE CARLSBAD, CA 92009-4859 (619) 438-1161 MISCELLANEOUS FEE RECEIPT Applicant Please Print And FIii In Shaded Area Only JOB ADDRESS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. OWNER OWNER'S MAILING ADDRESS CITY cA:eLS~ CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE LICENSE NO. SUBDIVISION ~- s o-c.cnet12..-0 ZIP 2.<)?) TEL. d,'; i. 3 ~>:, ZIP TEL. BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LOT(S) LEGAL DESCRIPTION LS) +-2.9 ~ Cc..v-./"~ I\'<) DESCRIPTION OF WORK 0036 ) CONT ACT PERSON ADDRESS CITY ZIP DATE White· FIie Yellow • Applicant PLAN ID NO. 5133 03/02/89 0001 01 05 Hise 158-00 VALIDATION AREA ESTMATED VALUATION PLAN CHECK FEE 001-810-00-00·8821 IF THE APPLICANT TAKES NO ACTION WITHIN 180 DAYS, PLAN CHECK FEES WILL BE FORFEITED. CHECK IF SUBMITTED: .0 2 ENERGY CALCS 2 1987 ENERGY CALCS □ FOR NON RESIDENTIAL BLDGS .0 2 STRUCTURAL CALCS 2 SOILS REPORTS 0 2 SELF ADDRESSED ENVELOPES DATE GIVEN/ SENT TO APPLICANT DATE LA COST A LETTER SCHOOL FEE FORM P & E CORRECTIONS LIST CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Pink • Finance Gold • Assessor