Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-04-05; Planning Commission; ; CT 94-08|CP 94-01 - POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA B-1APPLICATION JOMPLETE DATE: DECEMBER 20.1994 STAFF PLANNER: ERICMUNOZ STAFF ENGINEER: JIM DAVIS STAFF REPORT DATE: APRIL 5, 1995 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: CT 94-08/CP 94-01 - POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA "B-l" - A request for approval of a Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit for 158 clustered single family homes within the 20.1 acre P-C (Planned Community) zoned parcel of Planning Area "B-l" in the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan located north of the Batiquitos Lagoon and east of the railroad right of way, in the Coastal Zone, within Local Facilities Management Zone 9. I.RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3757 and 3758, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL of CT 94-08 and CP 94-01, respectively, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II.PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND This project is proposing a Tentative Tract Map and Condominium Permit to develop Planning Area "B-l" in conformance with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan with 158 clustered single family homes. Area "B-l" has been recently mass graded per the approval of master tentative map CT 94-01 ("B-l" is Lot 5 of CT 94-01) for the Poinsettia Shores project. A Tentative Tract Map is required per the Subdivision Map Act to subdivide into air space condominium units. A Condominium Permit (CP) is required since the project addresses several components of the intent and purpose of the Planned Development Ordinance as listed in Section 21.45.010 of the Zoning Ordinance. Specifically involved are: separate ownership of units upon a parcel of land containing more than one unit (air space ownership), development in accordance with the General Plan and applicable master plan, the allowance of flexibility in project design while providing for essential development standards and the provision of development which will be compatible with existing and permitted future surrounding developments. CT 94-08/CP 94-01 POnSTSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA "B-l" APRIL 5,1995 PAGE 2 The Master Plan designates a specific clustered single family product for Area "B-l" as conceptually depicted on Attachment "X", an excerpt from the Master Plan. The primary components of this product type are as follows: (1) air space building ownership and corresponding exclusive use area which total less than 3,500 square feet in area (average is 2,500 square feet); (2) a 15 x 15' minimum (225 square feet) or 10 x 30 minimum (300 square feet) area of exclusive use area private passive recreation for each unit, and; (3) a 24 foot wide courtyard serving a maximum of 4 units. These design standards are allowed via the approval of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan which is the implementing zoning document for the site and therefore may contain development regulations that are either not part of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 21), or are acceptable modifications from Title 21 standards. This innovative product type is one component of the residential product type diversity incorporated into the Master Plan. The primary design benefits of this product type are: the lack of long rows of garages facing onto and dominating a streetscape; and the ability to achieve the allowed density while providing all required master plan amenities and promoting an emphasis on pedestrian circulation. A typical 4-unit cluster layout (consistent with the Master Plan) is depicted on Exhibit "B". The site has a General Plan land use designation of RM (Residential-Medium). Per the Master Plan and RM designation, Area "B-l" is allowed a density range of 4-8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The proposed project with 158 units and a density of 7.9 du/ac, therefore, is consistent with the Master Plan which designates 161 dwelling units for Area "B-l". The site layout and overall project design is depicted on Exhibits "CW-"E". The location of Planning Area "B-l" within the Master Plan is depicted on the attached Location Map. The shape of this planning area is somewhat complex as it is bordered on several edges by a variety of existing and future permitted land uses (potential affordable housing site of PA "D", the detached single family homes of PA "A-l", the master plan recreation center PA "M", Avenida Encinas, the Lakeshore Gardens Mobile Home Park and the railroad right of way). The site itself is essentially flat and has no unique topographic features or significant environmental resources. North of the site is the Lakeshore Gardens mobile home park. East and south of the site is the future Avenida Encinas roadway alignment. West of the site is the vacant land associated with Planning Area "D" and also the railroad right of way; to the east of the site is the vacant land of Planning Area "A-l". The master tentative map for Poinsettia Shores (CT 94-01) approved in August 1994 allowed the mass grading of the master plan property, the construction of the Avenida Encinas roadway and related infrastructure to allow the development of individual planning areas. Only finish grading is required to the mass graded site for the development of Area "B-l". The project's finish grading involves 21,300 cubic yards (CY) of cut, 17,000 CY of fill with 4,300 CY of export to another location on the master plan property. CT 94-08/CP 94-01 PODSfSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA "B-l" APRIL 5, 1995 PAGE 3 The clustered single family homes will feature three floor plan types as shown on Exhibits "F" - "H": Plan type 1 has approximately 1,665 square feet (proposed height 26 feet); Plan type 2: 1,827 square feet (proposed height 26 feet), and; Plan type C: 2,130 square feet (proposed height 27 feet). Elevations are depicted on Exhibits "I" - "K". No plan type exceeds two stories. The proposed architecture is contemporary with roof tile, stucco accented with wood trim and a variety of roof planes and articulation so that in combination with the typical 4-unit cluster (Exhibit "B") a streetscape is created that is not dominated by long rows of garages facing onto the internal street system. All garages face onto the internal 24 foot wide courtyard. Every unit is served by a two car garage. As shown on Exhibits "C"-"E", an internal 36 foot wide private street will serve the project with guest parking allowed on both sides. The project is designed to meet the City's Noise Policy that applies to new residential development (over 5 units) within the City. Noise barrier wall heights and details (consistent with the project's noise study) are shown on Exhibits "C"-"E" and "L"-"O". A substantial portion of the Master Plan trail system will be developed with the Area B-l trail segment as shown on Exhibits "C"- "D" and "L" - "M". As also shown on these exhibits, the B-l trail segment borders the eastern, northern and western perimeters of the site. Avenida Encinas is adjacent to the southern perimeter with two street access points from Area "B-l" hi addition to a pedestrian link to Avenida Encinas along the border of the recreation center (PA "M") and Area "B-l" as indicated on Exhibits "D" and "M". The project will take access from Avenida Encinas via two private streets. Gated entries are proposed and designed into the project consistent with Engineering Department and Master Plan standards. Signage is proposed for the subject planning area near the project entrance in the form of the Village Identity Sign which meets pertinent Master Plan criteria (Exhibits "D", "M" and "O"). The proposed landscape concept (Exhibits "L"-"O") is designed to screen the development along the perimeter and from Avenida Encinas; and to promote land use compatibility with adjacent future planning areas. III. ANALYSIS The proposed project is subject to the following land use plans and regulations: A. Carlsbad General Plan B. Poinsettia Shores Master Plan - MP 175(D) C. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 20 (Subdivision Ordinance) D. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21 (Zoning Ordinance), including: 1. Chapter 21.45 Planned Development CT 94-08/CP 94-01 POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA "B-l" APRIL 5, 1995 PAGE 4 2. Chapter 21.85 Inclusionary Housing 3. Chapter 21.90 Growth Management E. West Batiquitos Local Coastal Program (LCP) A. GENERAL PLAN The approval of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan involved several findings of consistency with the City's General Plan. All development consistent with the master plan is therefore inherently consistent with the General Plan. By providing a product type at or below the approved density for the subject planning area, the master plan's implementation maintains consistency with the General Plan. By supplying residential market rate units per the master plan, the project is consistent with the Land Use and Housing Elements of the General Plan. The master plan was not required to provide any additional open space beyond natural open space areas previously dedicated by the master plan property. Since natural open space dedications are not required of this planning area, this project is consistent with the Open Space Element of the General Plan. By conducting a noise study and designing the project to comply with the City's noise policy for new residential development, the project is consistent with the Noise Element of the General Plan. B. POINSETTIA SHORES MASTER PLAN - MP 175(D) The proposal for Area "B-l" is in conformance with the governing master plan. The master plan allows 161 units of the clustered single family/courtyard product type (158 units are proposed). The master plan provides certain development standards and design criteria which are complied with and summarized as follows: (1) an 80 foot structural setback is maintained between the homes of Area "B-l" and the mobile home property line boundary to the north. Improvements within this buffer area are consistent with the Master Plan (underground utilities, parking, landscaping and a private trail segment); (2) the Lakeshore Gardens mobile home park has been consulted and approves of the proposed landscaping in the 80 foot buffer; (3) an average setback of 25 feet for all homes within the planning area from Avenida Encinas is maintained; (4) the proposed clustered single family product type is consistent with the product type designated for Area "B-l" by the Master Plan; (5) no structures will exceed the 30 feet/two story height limit associated with this planning area; and, (6) the proposed trail improvements are consistent with Master Plan requirements. In addition, the Master Plan refers to the PD Ordinance (since a Condominium Permit is involved). Compliance with the PD Ordinance development standards is discussed in Section D.I of this report. CT 94-08/CP 94-01 POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA "B-l" APRIL 5, 1995 PAGES C. CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE - TITLE 20 Since air space ownership and a condominium project is proposed, this project must comply with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 20). As reviewed and conditioned by the Engineering Department, the proposed project meets all applicable requirements relating to condominium projects in the City. No serious public health problems will be created by the proposed project. All necessary public facilities and infrastructure improvements, including circulation, drainage, sewer, water and utilities have either already been provided through the master tentative map (CT 94-01) or are conditions of approval for this project. D. CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE - TITLE 21 D.I. Chapter 21.45. Planned Development In addition to the specific development standards established by the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan (as discussed above) the Planned Development (PD) Ordinance is designated as the implementing ordinance for Planning Area "B-l". All of the required findings for the granting of a Condominium Permit (governed by the PD Ordinance) are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3758 for CP 94-01. Below is an overview of the PD standards compared against the proposed project. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE DENSITY LOT SIZE FRONT YARD SETBACK BUILDING SEPARATION BUILDING HEIGHT PRIVATE STREET WIDTH PARKING RESIDENT GUEST RV STORAGE REQUIRED/ALLOWED 4-8 DU/AC - 161 units N/A; Master Plan allows air space units w/exclusive use areas 10 feet from bade of sidewalk off private streets 10 foot min. w/allowable protrusions up to 2 feet each unit 30 feet max/2 stories 30 feet - no parking on street 32 feet - parking on one side 36 feet - parking on both sides 316 covered spaces 42 spaces Provided for w/PA "E'-SDP 94-03 PROPOSED 7.9 DU/AC - 158 units Clustered single family product type w/exclusive use private areas 10 feet from back of sidewalk off private streets 10 foot min. w/allowable protrusions up to 2 feet each unit 26 and 27 feet for three different plan types/2 stories max 36 foot internal private street system with parking allowed on both sides for visitors 316 covered spaces (garages) 147 on-street spaces Provided for w/PA "E--SDP 94-03 CT 94-08/CP 94-01 POINSETITA SHORES PLANNING AREA "B-l" APRIL 5,1995 PAGE 6 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE STORAGE SPACE RECREATION SPACE COMMON ACTIVE PRIVATE PASSIVE REQUIRED/ALLOWED Satisfied by 2 car garage space Provided for w/PA *M"-SDP 94-03. PA "M" plus exclusive use private passive area with each unit PROPOSED Satisfied by 2 car garage space Provided for w/PA "M"rSDP 94-03 PA "M" plus 15 x 15 ft min (225 sq ft) or 10 x 30 ft min (300 sq ft) for each unit per the Master Plan The project also is consistent with the design criteria outlined in the PD Ordinance. Findings relating to the project's conformance to these design criteria are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3758 for CP 94-01. In summary, the plan is comprehensive and innovative in that it accounts for the location, constraints (noise) and shape of the site. Adequate usable open space and recreation areas are provided. Buildings are well integrated and the provision for required parking areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation is made. Being a part of an approved master plan, there will be no disruptive elements introduced into the community by the proposed project. The internal street system is functional while not dominating the site and all common areas are accessible to the future residents and well related to each other. Finally, architectural harmony will be obtained within the area through appropriate building height limitations, perimeter screening/buffering and proper planning of adjacent planning areas. D.2. Chapter 21.85. Inclusionary Housing This project's inclusionary affordable housing requirement is satisfied by the approval and development of Planning Area "D" within the Master Plan (CT 94-10/CP 94-03/SDP 94-08) or the approval of an offsite Affordable Housing Agreement. Either case will result in the provision of 90 affordable housing units, consistent with the Master Plan. A detailed summary of master plan affordable housing provisions is contained in the staff report for Area "D" (CT 94-10). While no units in the subject subdivision are required to be restricted as affordable housing units, the project will be conditioned so that no final map approval will be granted until the on-site project for Area "D" (CT 94-10) receives final map approval; or an off-site Affordable Housing Agreement is approved by the Planning Director and Community Development Director. D.3. Chapter 21.90. Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 9 in the Southwest Quadrant of the City. Zone 9 has an approved Finance Plan which outlines the provision of facilities and services for the buildout of the master plan, including the allowable density of the proposed project. The impacts created by the development on CT 94-08/CP 94-01 POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA "B-l" APRIL 5,1995 PAGE? public facilities and compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized as follows: FACILITY CITY ADMINISTRATION LIBRARY WASTE WATER TREATMENT PARKS DRAINAGE CIRCULATION FIRE OPEN SPACE SCHOOLS SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM WATER IMPACTS 586 square feet 313 square feet 158 EDUs N/A N/A 1580 ADT Station No. 4 N/A CUSD 158 EDUs 34,760 GPD COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes The project is 3 dwelling units below the Growth Management Dwelling Unit allowance, and 38 units above the Growth Management Control Point, for the property as permitted by the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. This project can be approved above the growth control point since the quadrant cap for the southwest quadrant of the City will not be exceeded and facilities serving the density in excess of the growth control point will be provided. The proposed density, while exceeding the growth control point, is within the 4-8 du/ac range allowed by RM designation and the master plan. All required facilities and services will be available to serve the project and the anticipated buildout of the master plan. All required Growth Management findings are contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3757 for CT 94-08. E. WEST BATIQUTTOS LCP The approval of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan in January 1994 included a Local Coastal Program (LCP) Amendment (LCPA 91-02) for the West Batiquitos LCP which was approved by the California Coastal Commission on May 12, 1994. Coastal Commission's certification of LCPA 91-02 established the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan as the implementing ordinance/document for the West Batiquitos LCP. All development consistent with the master plan, such as the proposal for this planning area, is therefore in confonnance with the West Batiquitos LCP and all applicable coastal regulations. A Coastal Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission will be required prior to final map approval. CT 94-08/CP 94-01 POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA "B-l" APRILS, 1995 PAGES IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW As discussed in the Initial Study for this project (Environmental Impact Assessment Form, Part II), all potential environmental impacts associated with the development of this planning area have already been identified and mitigated to a level of insignificance. Environmental analysis and documentation for the master plan and subsequent planning areas was conducted for the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan (MP 175(D)) and the master tentative map (CT 94-01) resulting in the issuance and approval of Mitigated Negative Declarations. Since all applicable mitigation measures have either been completed (i.e. archeological and paleontological monitoring during the mass grading) or designed into the project (i.e. noise attenuation and noise policy compliance), no environmental impacts will result from the proposed development of this planning area. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance was issued and duly noticed on March 2, 1995. V. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The proposed project is in compliance with the Carlsbad General Plan, Poinsettia Shores Master Plan, West Batiquitos LCP, Zone 9 Finance Plan and Local Facilities Management Plan documents and Carlsbad Municipal Code, Titles 20 and 21 as described in this report. Therefore, staff recommends approval of CT 94-04 and PUD 94-03, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained within their respective resolutions. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3757 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3758 3. Location Map 4. Environmental Impact Assessment Form, Part II dated February 22, 1995 5. Notice of Prior Compliance dated March 2, 1995 6. Background Data Sheet 7. Disclosure Form 8. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 9. Attachment "X", dated April 5, 1995 (excerpt of Exhibit 37 from Master Plan) 10. Reduced Exhibits "A" - "O" 11. Exhibits "A" - "O", dated April 5, 1995. ENMarddh BATIQUITOS LAGOON POINSETTIA SHORES RA. B-1--CT 94-08/CP 94-01 LOCATION MAP BATIQUITOS LAGOON POINSETTIA SHORES P.A. B-2--CP 94-02 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. CT 94-08/CP 94-01 and CP 94-02 DATE: February 22. 1995 BACKGROUND 1. CASE NAME: Poinsettia Shores - Planning Areas B-l and B-2 2. APPLICANT: Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 7220 Avenida Encinas. Suite 200 Carlsbad. CA 92009 : (619) 931-9100 4. DATE EIA FORM PART I SUBMITTED: April 25. 1994 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Two planning areas within the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan: (1) Area "B-l" involves a Tentative Tract Map (to subdivide into air space ownership units) and a Condominium Permit pursuant to the City's Planned Development Ordinance and consists of 158 clustered single family units on 20.1 acres, and (2) Area "B-2" involves a Condominium Permit pursuant to the City's Planned Development Ordinance and consists of 16 clustered single family units on 2.4 acres. Both planning areas are consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The summary of environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact", or "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use and Planning X Transportation/Circulation Public Services Population and Housing Biological Resources Utilities and Service Systems Geological Problems Energy and Mineral Resources Aesthetics Water Hazards Cultural Resources _X_ Air Quality X Noise Recreation Mandatory Findings of Significance 1 Rev. 1/30/95 DETERMINATION. (To be completed by the Lead Agency). On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. D I find that the proposed project MAY have significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION is required, but h must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR / MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Therefore, a Notice of Prior Compliance has been prepared. SI L-^CC / I Planner Signature Date Planning Director Signature Date V2 *». 1/3<V9S ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15063 requires that the City conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This checklist identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or to rely on a previously approved EIR or Negative Declaration. • A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by an information source cited in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved. A "No Impact" answer should be explained when there is no source document to refer to, or it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards. • "Less Than Significant Impact" applies where there is supporting evidence that the potential impact is not adversely significant, and die impact does not exceed adopted general standards and policies. • "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The developer must agree to the mitigation, and the City must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. • "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. Based on an "ElA-Part IT, if a proposed project could have a potentially significant effect on the environment, but all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards, (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Mitigated Negative Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, and (c) none of the circumstances requiring a supplement to or supplemental EIR are present and all of the mitigation measures required by the prior environmental document have been required or incorporated into this project, then no additional environmental document is required (Prior Compliance). A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. If there are one or more potentially significant effects, the City may avoid preparing an EIR if there are mitigation measures to clearly reduce impacts to less than significant, and those mitigation measures are agreed to by the developer prior to public review. In this case, the appropriate "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" may be checked and a Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared. Rev. 1/30/95 • When "Potentially Significant Impact* is checked the project is not necessarily required to prepare an EIR if the significant effect has been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and the effect will be mitigated, or a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" has been made pursuant to that earlier EIR. • An EIR must be prepared if "Potentially Significant Impact" is checked, and including but not limited to the following circumstances: (1) the potentially significant effect has not been discussed or mitigated in an Earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and the developer does not agree to mitigation measures that reduce the impact to less than significant; (2) a "Statement of Overriding Considerations" for the significant impact has not been made pursuant to an earlier EIR; (3) proposed mitigation measures do not reduce the impact to less than significant, or, (4) through the EIA-Part n analysis it is not possible to determine the level of significance for a potentially adverse effect, or determine the effectiveness of a mitigation measure in reducing a potentially significant effect to below a level of significance. A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing mitigation for impacts which would otherwise be determined significant. Rev. 1/30/95 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact L LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (Source b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? (Source #*s: 13) c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (Source #1) d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? (Source #*s: 1,2) e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low- income or minority community)? (Source # 1) __ JL — JL _ JL __ JL H. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (Source #1) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (Source #1) c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (Source #1) — JL JL _ _ JL Rev. 1/30/95 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): m. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? (Source fs: 2,4) b) Seismic ground shaking? (Source #*s: 2,4) c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? (Source It's: 2,4) d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? (Source #*s: 2,4) e) Landslides or mudflows? (Source #*$: 2,4) 0 Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? (Source #*s: 2,4) g) Subsidence of the land? (Source Ws: 2,4) h) Expansive soils? (Source Ws: 2,4) i) Unique geologic or physical features? (Source ff's: 2,4) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact JL JL JL — JL __ JL JL JL _ JL — JL IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (Source rs: 2,5) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? (Source #s: 2,5) JL _ Rev. 1/30/95 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (Source ^s: 2,5) d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (Source #*s: 2,5) e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (Source #2) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? (Source #2) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? (Source h) Impacts to groundwater quality? (Source #2) i) Substantial reduction in the amount of groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? (Source #2) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact JL JL JL — JL — JL JL — JL V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Source tfs: 1,2,8) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (Source fs: U) c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate? (Source #*s: 1,2) d) Create objectionable odors? (Source #*$: 1,2) JL _ JL _ JL _ JL Rev. 1/30/95 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Signifk Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact Impact VL TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? (Source ^s: 1,6,8) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? (Source rs: 1,2) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses? (Source #*s: 1,2) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? (Source tfs: 1,2) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? (Source #*s: 1,2) f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Source Ws: 1,2) g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? (Source tfs: 1,2) JL _ _ JL __ JL — JL JL _ JL __ JL VH. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds? (Source ft's: 1,2,3) b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage trees)? (Source rs: 1,2)_ JL 8 Rev. 1/30/95 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? (Source Ws: 1,2,3) d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal pool)? (Source tfs: 1,2,3) e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? (Source tfs: 1,2,3) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact JL JL JL Vm. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (Source tfs: 1,2) b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (Source #*s: 1,2) c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? (Source _ JL __ JL JL IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation? (Source IPs: 1,2) b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Source *s: 1,2) c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? (Source #*s: 1,2) d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (Source #*s: 1,2) — JL JL __ JL JL Rev. 1/30/95 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): e) Increase fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (Source Ws: 1,2) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Than Significant Impact No Impact X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (Source IPs: 1,2) b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (Source rs: 1,7) JL X XL PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (Source tf's: 1,9) b) Police protection? (Source tfs: 1,9) c) Schools? (Source ^s: 1,9) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (Source tfs: 1,9) e) Other governmental services? (Source #*s: 1,9) JL JL JL JL JL UTILITIES AND SERVICES SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? (Source tf's: 1,9) b) Communications 'systems? (Source #1) JL JL 10 Rev. 1/30/95 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? (Source #s: 1,9) d) Sewer or septic tanks? (Source IPs: 1,9) e) Storm water drainage? (Source #*s: 1,9) f) Solid waste disposal? (Source Ws: 1,9) g) Local or regional water supplies? (Source tfs: 1,9) Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact JL JL __ JL JL __ JL AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (Source #1) b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? (Source #1) c) Create light or glare? (Source XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? (Source #s: 1,2) b) Disturb archaeological resources? (Source tf's: 1,2) c) Affect historical resources? (Source Ws: 1,2) d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (Source #*s: 1,2) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? (Source tfs: 1,2) — JL JL JL JL _ JL _ JL _ JL JL 11 Rev. 1/30/95 Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? (Source #1) b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (Source #1) XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wild life species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 12 Rev. 1/30/95 XVIL EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the CEQA Guidelines. In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets: a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. All pertinent earlier analyses have been identified at the beginning of the Discussion of Environmental Evaluation. The Source Documents identified have been cited as appropriate in the checklist and environmental discussion. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. 1. Air Quality and Circulation Impacts: Statements of Overriding Consideration made with the City's General Plan Master EER (Source Document #8). 2. Archeological and Paleontological Impacts: Mass grading monitoring required by Source Documents #1 and 2. 3. Noise Impacts: Noise study (Source #7) was required by Source Document #1. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. Mitigation measures specific to this project include: (1) Archeological and paleontological monitoring which was carried out during the mass grading of the site in accordance with the approval of CT 94-Oi, and (2) noise mitigation designed into the project pursuant to a site specific noise analysis conducted for the proposed project. 13 Rev. 1/30/95 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION SOURCE DOCUMENTS CITED (All source documents are on file in the Planning Department located at 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92009; (619) 438-1161) 1. Poinsettia Shores Master Plan Mitigated Negative Declaration and corresponding Environmental Impact Assessment Form Part n dated July 26, 1993. 2. Poinsettia Shores Master Tentative Map Mitigated Negative Declaration and corresponding Environmental Impact Assessment Form Part n dated April 1, 1994. 3. West Batiquitos LCP certified by the Coastal Commission May 12, 1994 4. Geotechnical Investigation for the Proposed Batiquitos Lagoon Educational Park by Woodward-Clyde Consultants dated June 4, 1986. 5. Hydrology Study prepared by OTJay Consultants dated April 30, 1993. 6. Transportation Analysis for Poinsettia Shores by Urban Systems Associates dated May 17, 1993. 7. Noise Analysis for Poinsettia Shores Planning Area B-l by Mestre Greve Associates dated July 19, 1994. Noise Analysis for Poinsettia Shores Planning Area B-2 by Mestre Greve Associates dated June 29, 1994. 8. City of Carlsbad General Plan Final Master EIR 93-01 approved by City Council Resolution No. 94-246. 9. Zone 9 Local Facilities Management Plan (LFMP) documents including amendment LFMP 87-09(A) (approved January 4, 1994) and the Zone 9 Finance Plan (approved September 6, 1994) PROJECT BACKGROUND/OVERVIEW OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Planning Areas B-l and B-2 are proposed in full compliance with all applicable provisions of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. The proposed densities are within the limits established by the master plan which designated these planning areas with Residential-Medium (RM) General Plan designations. Area B-l proposes 158 clustered single family units (161 allowed) and Area B-2 proposes 16 clustered single family units (16 allowed). The clustered single family product is a specific product type allowed by the master plan that features a 24 foot wide driveway to serve four detached single family units. All applicable development standards and design criteria are complied with. Areas B-l and B-2 are within the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan as shown on the attached Location Map. The Poinsettia Shores Master Plan (MP 175-D) was approved in January 1994 and incorporated a Mitigated Negative Declaration (Source Document #1) which was intended to identify environmental impacts and related mitigation measures to allow the buildout of the residential portion of the master plan. As a result, the master plan contains environmental mitigation measures on a planning area by planning area basis. The subject planning areas have either completed applicable mitigation measures or incorporated them into their project design. Subsequent to the master plan approval, the Poinsettia Shores Master Tentative Map (CT 94-01) was approved in August 1994 and incorporated another Mitigated Negative Declaration (Source Document #2) to allow mass grading of the master plan property, construction of the Avenida Encinas roadway, and construction of drainage improvements on the west side of the master plan site. The subject planning area sites are already mass graded from the approval 14 Rev. 1/30/95 of CT 94-01. All necessary infrastructure to serve the buildout of the residential planning areas has either already been constructed or are financially secured to guarantee their construction concurrent with need. Section 21080.7 of CEQA and Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines allows a residential project, developed consistent with applicable General Plan designations, to be determined in prior compliance with existing environmental review if an EIR has been certified for the subject General Plan. Such is the case with the City's General Plan Update Final Master EIR 93-01 (Source Document #8) certified in September 1994. This document is referenced in addressing the Air Quality and Circulation impacts associated with master plan buildout ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DISCUSSION (The brief discussions below are intended to summarize and/or supplement the evidence contained in the pertinent Source Documents as noted on the checklist). 1. Land Use and Planning a)-c), e): The proposed planning areas implement the governing Poinsertia Shores Master Plan in conformance with all master plan standards and guidelines, the Residential-Medium (RM) General Plan designation and the coastal regulations of the West Batiquitos Lagoon Local Coastal Program (LCP). d): All agricultural conversion fees required for the mass grading of the master plan site associated with the approval of CT 94-01 have been paid or secured to the City's satisfaction. Mass grading of the site is near completion at this time. 2. Population and Housing a)-c): Local population projections and limits will not be exceeded by the buildout of the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan including the development of the subject planning areas. Development of the Avenida Encinas roadway and related infrastructure associated with CT 94-01 will induce the buildout of the master plan in accordance with the General Plan and zoning regulations including Growth Management compliance. 3. Geologic Problems a)-i): The sites for Planning Areas B-l and B-2 have recently been mass graded per the approval CT 94-01. Refined finish grading is required for the construction of building pads and internal roadways. B-l requires approximately 21,300 cubic yards (cy) of cut, 17,000 cy of fill and 4,300 cy yards of export. B-2 requires approximately 1,900 cy of cut, 1,100 cy of fill and 800 cy yards of export. Standard grading permit procedures will apply. No seismic, geologic of surface substrate hazards are associated with the master plan site including the subject planning area sites. 4. Water a)-i): The development of streets and residential units will increase the amount of impervious areas and change existing absorption rates, however, all proposed drainage for buildout of the master plan's residential planning areas meets City and Engineering Department standards. Major drainage infrastructure has been provided by approval of CT 94-01. No flood hazards will be created by the development of the subject planning areas. No adverse impacts to the Batiquitos Lagoon system will be created by the buildout of the master plan including the subject planning areas. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards are required to reduce urban pollutant quantities in drainage runoff. No impacts to any groundwater resources will be created by buildout of the master plan. 15 Rev. 1/30/95 5. Air Quality a): Since the proposed planning areas are residential projects per Section 21080.7 of CEQA and Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, the buildout of the master plan including the development of the subject planning areas was included in the updated 1994 General Plan Final Master EIR 93-01 and will result in increased gas and electric power consumption and vehicle miles traveled. These subsequently result in increases in the emission of carbon monoxide, reactive organic gases, oxides of nitrogen and sulfur, and suspended particulates. These aerosols are the major contributors to air pollution in the City as well as in the San Diego Air Basin. Since the San Diego Air Basin is a "non-attainment basin", any additional air emissions are considered cumulatively significant: therefore, continued development to buildout as proposed in the updated General Plan will have cumulative significant impacts on the air quality of the region. To lessen or minimize the impact on air quality associated with General Plan buildout, a variety of mitigation measures are recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include: 1) provisions for roadway and intersection improvements prior to or concurrent with development; 2) measures to reduce vehicle trips through the implementation of Congestion and Transportation Demand Management; 3) provisions to encourage alternative modes of transportation including mass transit services; 4) conditions to promote energy efficient building and site design; and 5) participation in regional growth management strategies when adopted. The applicable and appropriate General Plan ah- quality mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval. Operation-related emissions are considered cumulatively significant because the project is located within a "non-attainment basin", therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for air quality impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Final Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of air quality impacts is required. This document is available at the Planning Department. b)-d): Development of the subject planning areas will not expose sensitive receptor to known significantly adverse pollutants or significantly change any air characteristics including moisture, temperature or odor. 6. Transportation/Circulation a): Since the proposed planning areas are residential projects per Section 21080.7 of CEQA and Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines, the buildout of the master plan including the development of the subject planning areas was included in the updated 1994 General Plan and will result in increased traffic volumes. Roadway segments will be adequate to accommodate buildout traffic; however, 12 full and 2 partial intersections will be severely impacted by regional through-traffic over which the City has no jurisdictional control. These generally include all freeway interchange areas and major intersections along Carlsbad Boulevard. Even with the implementation of roadway improvements, a number of intersections are projected to fail the City's adopted Growth Management performance standards at buildout. 16 Rev. 1/30/95 To lessen or minimize the impact on circulation associated with General Plan buildout, numerous mitigation measures have been recommended in the Final Master EIR. These include measures to ensure the provision of circulation facilities concurrent with need; 2) provisions to develop alternative modes of transportation such as trails, bicycle routes, additional sidewalks, pedestrian linkages, and commuter rail systems; and 3) participation in regional circulation strategies when adopted. The diversion of regional through-traffic from a failing Interstate or State Highway onto City streets creates impacts that are not within the jurisdiction of the City to control. The applicable and appropriate General Plan circulation mitigation measures have either been incorporated into the design of the project or are included as conditions of project approval Regional related circulation impacts are considered cumulatively significant because of the failure of intersections at buildout of the General Plan due to regional through-traffic, therefore, the "Initial Study" checklist is marked "Potentially Significant Impact". This project is consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the preparation of an EIR is not required because the recent certification of Final Master EIR 93-01, by City Council Resolution No. 94-246, included a "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" for circulation impacts. This "Statement Of Overriding Considerations" applies to all subsequent projects covered by the General Plan's Master EIR, including this project, therefore, no further environmental review of circulation impacts is required. b)-g): All streets will meet City standards, facilitate emergency vehicle access into the subject planning areas, create no conflicts between pedestrians and bicyclists and will not interfere with railroad activities. Various master plan components incorporate bicycle racks, provisions for buses and mass transit and pedestrian trails and linkages which will benefit the residents of the subject planning areas. 7. Biological Resources a)-e): No biological resources or sensitive habitat are associated with the subject planning area sites. All open space requirements of the master plan have been secured to allow buildout of the master plan. The Batiquitos Lagoon and associated wetlands and sensitive bluffs will not be impacted by the development of Areas B-l and B-2. 8. Energy and Mineral Resources a)-c): Non-renewable resources, energy and mineral resources will not be affected by the development of the subject planning areas. 9. Hazards a)-e): No hazards will be associated with the construction and development of the subject residential planning areas. Emergency vehicle access is provided to adequately serve Areas B-l and B-2. Flammable hazards or explosion potential will not created by the project 10. Noise a): The development of residential dwelling units will not significantly increase existing noise levels. b): As required by previous environmental review and corresponding mitigation measures, Areas B-l and B-2 have been designed pursuant to the recommendations of site specific noise studies so that compliance with the City's Noise policy and element of the General Plan will be maintained and no significant noise impacts will result. 17 Rev. 1/30/95 11. Public Services a)-e): Both subject planning areas comply with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan and the requirements and standards of the Zone 9 Local Facilities Management Plan and related documents. Therefore, all necessary public facilities and services will be adequately provided to serve the buildout of the master plan including Areas B-l and B-2. 12. Utilities and Services Systems a>g): Provisions for adequate utilities, water treatment, sewage, storm water drainage and water supplies have been secured and/or accounted for via the infrastructure associated with CT 94-01 and compliance with the Zone 9 LFMP. Coast Waste Management has reviewed the subject planning areas and have indicated that adequate solid waste disposal service can be provided. 13. Aesthetics a)-c): No scenic vista or highway considerations are pertinent to the subject planning areas. No aesthetic impacts will result from development of Areas B-l and B-2. 14. Cultural Resources a)-e): No cultural resources of any kind are associated with the subject planning area sites. All required archeological and paleontological monitoring that was required during the mass grading process has been satisfactorily completed. No historic or significant ethnic cultural or religious resources will be impacted by the development of Areas B-l and B-2. 15. Recreation a)-b): No recreational facilities currently exist on or near the subject planning areas. Passive recreation areas are provided throughout the site designs of Areas B-l and B-2 usually near the interface with the master plan's trail system. Another planning area in the master plan (Area M) is designated and designed as a multiple use active and passive recreation center intended for the use of master plan residents, including those of Areas B-l and B-2. No impacts to recreational resources or opportunities will result from the development of the subject planning areas. 18 Rev. 1/30/95 LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) ATTACH MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM OF APPLICABLE) APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WITH MITIGATION MEASURES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES AND CONCUR WITH THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT. Date Signature 19 Rev. 1/3Q/95 City of Carlsbad Planning Department PUBLIC NOTICE OF PRIOR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE Please Take Notice: The Planning Department has determined that the environmental effects of the project described below have already been considered in conjunction with previously certified environmental documents and, therefore, no additional environmental review will be required and a notice of determination will be filed. Project Title: POINSETTIA SHORES - PLANNING AREA'S "B-l" AND "B-2" Project Location: Poinsettia Shores Master Plan, north of Batiquitos Lagoon and east of the railroad right-of-way. Project Description: "B-l" consists of 158 clustered single family units on 20.1 acres and HB-2" consists of 16 clustered single family units on 2.4 acres. Both planning areas are consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. Justification for this determination is on file in the Planning Department, Community Development, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit comments in writing to die Planning Department widiin ten (10) days of date of publication. DATED: MARCH 2, 1995 MICHAEL J. CASE NO: CT 94-08/CP 94-01 - PA "B-l" Planning Director CP 94-02 - PA "B-2" APPLICANT: POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREAS "B-l" AND "B-2" PUBLISH DATE: MARCH 2, 1995 EM.-vd 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92OO9-1576 • (619)438-1161 BACKGROUND DATA SHEET CASE NO: CT 94-08/CP 94-01 CASE NAME: Poinsettia Shores Planning Area B-l APPLICANT: Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation REQUEST AND LOCATION: One hundred fifty-eight (1581 clustered single family homes within Planning Area B-l consistent with the Poinsettia Shores Master Plan. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5 of Carlsbad Tract 94-01. in the Citv of Carlsbad. County of San Dieeo according to Map No. 13181 filed in the office of the San Diego Recorder on January 26. 1995. APN: 216-140-32. 33 Acres: 20.1 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 158 units (Assessor's Parcel Number) GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation Residential Medium (RM) Density Allowed 4-8 du/ac Density Proposed 7.9 du/ac Existing Zone PC Proposed Zone PC Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Zoning Land Use Site PC Vacant (PA B-l) North RMHP Lakeshore Gardens Mobilehome Park South PC Avenida Encinas East PC PA's A-l and M West PC and TC PA D and Railroad-right-of-way PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 158 Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated December 9. 1994 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Negative Declaration, issued Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated Other, Notice of Prior Compliance issued March 2. 1995 City of Carlsbad Planning Department DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPLICANTS STATEMENT QF CtSClOSUflE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH WfLL REQUlP-E oisc?enoNA«v ACTION ON THS PAST of THE CITY COUNCIL OP. ANY APPOINTED BCAPO. COMMISSION OR COMMOTES. (Please Print) The following information must be disclosed: 1. Applicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 7220 Avenida Encinas Suite 200 Carlsoaa, cs 2. Owner List the names and addresses of ail persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation 7220 Avenida Encinas Suite LarisoaQ, 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names anc addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any pannersn:? interest in the partnership. Saida California, Inc. 7220 Avenida 'rtcinas Suite 200 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2J above is a non-profit organization or a taist. list the names anc acdresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or oeneficary of the trust. FRM00013 8/90 2075 l_as Paimas Drive • Carlsoad. California 920O9-*flS9 • (619) A38-1 *6i Disclosure Statement •Cve/v Page 2 5. Have you had mere than S250 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Scares Commissions. Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No if yes, please indicate person(s) °»fson it oafinad w: 'Any individual, firm. eoQartnarsnip, joint vantura. aaaoeiaeon. tociai club, fratafnat organization, corporation, ««tata. w*u. racaivar. tyndicata. Una and any otn«r county, ctry and county, city municipality, district of ottw political *uodivi»i«n. or any otn«r ;rouo -r comQination acting aa a unit* (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.) Signature of Owner/date Pnnt or type name of owner Signature of applicant/date Print or type name of applicant CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: Poinsettia Shores Planning Area B-l - CT 94-08/CP 94-01 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE:_9__ GENERAL PLAN: RM ZONING: PC - Poinsettia Shores Master Plan DEVELOPER'S NAME: Kaiza Poinsettia Corporation ADDRESS: 7220 Avenida Encinas. Suite 200. Carlsbad. CA 92009 PHONE NO.: (619) 931-9100 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 216-140-32. 33 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC, SQ. FT., DU): 20.1 acres ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage « 58o B. Library: Demand in Square Footage - 313 C. Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) N/A D. Park: Demand in Acreage = N/A E. Drainage: Demand in CFS = N/A Identify Drainage Basin - B (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) F. Circulation: Demand in ADTs - 1.580 (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) G. Fire: Served by Fire Station No. - 4 H. Open Space: Acreage Provided - N/A I. Schools: N/A (Demands to be determined by staff) J. Sewer: Demand in EDUs - 158 Identify Sub Basin - N/A (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) K. Water: Demand in GPD - 34.760 L. The project is 3 units below the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. EM:vd oooo Guest Parking Guest Parking 36' WIDE PRIVATE STREET Guest Parking TYPICAL CLUSTER PLAN - 4 UNITS MAX. Note: See Design Criteria for provisions of private recreation areas. Minimum lineal dimension shall be 10 feet. Note: There are no individual lot lines separating houses, the units may be air space condos or a similar type of ownership concept. M Itti •I r KAIZA POINSETTIA CORPORATION EXHIBIT 37 EASEMENT NOTES * MM Or III•x TIM, N me* r/N M-tt«2M,Oft ll/t/H IO/II/M LOT 0 SAN DIEGO NORTHERN RAJLROAO GENERAL NOTES: . »lt-140-Jt-lX * MONO WOT* 9 XCINM M4i* or IK PARKING SUMMARY: ers-"T urn NUWOCR Of IMT* ocwn GRADING. ANALYSIS: M>. cr. t«-«i nuLif r*k ir.ooo or. MKMT: —— C>W*: •JOB Of. BENCHMARK: ON IOHM ovmcNT a SHEET 1 OF 5 SHEETS C.T. 94-08 C.P. 94-01 TENTATIVE MAP FOR POINSETTIA SHORES PLANNING AREA B-l LEGEND; -ea- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: IQf S V CMUB« TMCT f«-0t. Mcoufffv or I*N MCO, ir«t orIMMV NO. uiiiTTu* M <Kor SM MOO COUMV ON MMMif H. ttMi or CIVIL ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR: OTfNER/SUBDIVlDER: D wM < itf59 tt !•- IH9I *tt ti 1HJ) JM Jt. i|H •L«. ON MMio ynwcryssKfiffvss EXHIBIT "A" ><*^imr. TtHCM. SICT70N - OOSIHM010 4HMO* Scout mKM ^-— AL srenoH - mvtrr snrrr srncrs*y.i.c.o.c SHEET 2 Of 5 £.-££:^ C.T. 94-08 C.P. 94-01 IfCfMi* - AVTMIfU FttCtHAS 9 Jr BENCHMARK: :£!•.••'.-.'. |»««N*p OflC ST /volt. * ***' W<« • or iour>« [*•«•"r CAS- ^i WO tCT lM.UM surem CMM.UM sure »««H 40 rcr CcCNt[4Lmc or -"Ootw ao•LvO ON «ONfO 1TOCCr ^^^ •Erl^r.v'SC 0 * ' -J t r *X^ r < '_. " blXCir V wQMi *-ow ^^ «Cl ] EXHIBIT "B" SHEET 3 OF 5 SHEETS C.T. 94-08C.P. 94-01 EXHIBIT "C" C.T. 94-03 P.U.D. 94-01 EXHIBIT "D" i,-"T 5 Of 5 SHEETS C.7. 94-08C.P. 94-01 ^/VXXx-7^?- '"-// T/v S^-<-- EXHIBIT SECOND FLOOR PLAN MAR 0 8 1995 cm-<> <:^i,.,.^ PLAN 1 1665 S.F. FIRST FLOOR PLAN KALI t U4"»t'-** * I « • LEQENO MMM ,'. : 3KS PLANNING AREA B-l AN THE VILLAOB OP BRJQHTO § H gW 2 O0, Ior6 EXHBIT "F" ^gltf SECOND FLOOR PLAN MAR 0 3 1995 PLAN 2 1827 S.P. FIRST FLOOR PLAN LEGEND KALI i w.r-r t i « PLANNING AREA B-l AND B-2 THE VILLAGE OP BRIGHTON EXrtBIT "G' SECOND FLOOR PLAN R r"tf"»™; !*••>•*i— \_, 4^. t V k*i L/ MAR 0 8 1995 PLAN 3 2130 S.F. FIRST FLOOR PLAN «CALI i m-.r<- t i 4 • LEGEND • UMM - MVM - *Mira* - •«•• c - MaM«« * PLANNING AREA B 1 AT IHi CO O W0) w I 2 IfMMTii^i 3 or 6 EXHIBIT 1 !!, PLAN1 FRONT ELEVATION h«-4» •!•*.. t—ihMMM*•h*U«ri ri* Mwri •Mxdte*M*«^<MMw<ri«M*^«#>Brtri*«*«**^ RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION MAR 0 8 1S95 OKCO 2 PLANNING AREA B 1 AND B-2 THE VILLAGE OP BRIGHTON 4 ore EXHIBIT T LEFT ELEVATION PLAN 2 FRONT ELEVATION III V.4 8ow CO P ) RIGHT ELEVATION ' """~ REAR ELEVATION MAR 0 8 1095 PLANNING AREA B 1 AND B-2 6 or 6 THE VIUAOK Or BRIGHTON EXHIBIT "J' r LEFT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION MAR 0 8 1995 PLAN 3 FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION PLANNING AREA B-l AND B-2 THB V1LLAOB OP BRIGHTON to §O 5o PH fftrw 6 or 6 EXHIBIT "K" I I•' •' \ I PLANT MATKRIAL PALETTE Hjf'J.™" ""•"""'""""" Ssa,^- TO tlflLUT- •ff~^-.-..—"- OTT. «mn«*. ISkrvta »» I CcllM. *•« I ClHM M Umftitmf* t ""'""' r-r""""- " <••••" n« I "-— "« "— ~»• £S3 C^? Ji'ui-' 1 3 1995 aSi'm LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN POINSETTIA SHORES, AREA B-I BENCHMARK:PL-1 EXHIBIT "L" ;D nc rtoirrawi HA a LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN POINSETTIA SHORES, AREAB-l EXHIBIT "M" AYtNIDA ENCfNAl IMmOVCMCNT FLANSion moroniD LAjiD9CAPtf<a UYOND NOISE•AIIMUU: Owe o3T-»u wm^W LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN POINSETTIA SHORES, AREA B-l EXHIBIT "N" KLKVA I >V>* ( 4 1 VI*-I>*CC IDtNTITt SIQ MAR 1 3 1935 I-,,. c® ri-AH-jim •{•UttUlbMr i rT^ \ SOLO BLPCK 1ECTIPNO4QISE BAHBKHjjr.-.rr,-,^-. Cl. INTERIOR FENCIN4 !•••• ••••• SCALE 3/*'« T- 0' LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN POINSETTIA SHORES, AREA B-i ;*«* r*~t H M.I>».I ••I TESHIUA DESIGN GROUPLAHDftCAra AMCKTrtCTVULAND rijunnNcV0O) •U(I««MPM>* A*v.. ItrfU C^ fcuOMf* . CA «IJII Tiupkn*. 1*1*1 «»•««( FAX. (*l*l M9-lttl.„ •— fc — «. ?L1 EXHBIT "O'