HomeMy WebLinkAboutSDP 2018-0014; 635 PINE AVENUE CONDOS; PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY & HYDRAULICS STUDY; 2021-02-23-
-
-
Preliminary
Hydrology & Hydraulics Study
SOP 2018-0014 / MS2018-0011
635 Pine Avenue Condominiums
at
635 Pine Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Dwg. No.
APN: 204-082-01-00
Prepared For
Tony Cassolato
576 Camino Eldorado
Encinitas, CA 92024
Phone: 619-823-3602
Prepared By
Landmark Engineering Corporation
Lawrence E. Cole, RCE 36292
3443 Camino Del Rio South #204
San Diego, California 92108
Phone 619-260-0420
~
RCE36292
Exp. 6/30/22
Project #2462
February 23, 2021
-
~
~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
C INTRODUCTION
,,,,... PROJECT DESCRIPTION
METHODOLOGY
Existing Condition Hydrology
Post-Development Hydrology
HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS
INTENSITY-DURATION DESIGN CHART (100-yr Tc= 5 min.)
INTENSITY-DURATION DESIGN CHART (2-yr Tc= 5 min.)
RAINFALL ISO PLUVIALS
100-YEAR 6-HOUR PRECIPITATION
100-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION
2-YEAR 6-HOURPRECIPITATION
2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION
RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS (Table 3-1)
-CONCLUSION
CERTIFICATION
REFERENCES
ATTACHMENTS
C DRAINAGE MAPS
C DRAINAGE MAP (EXISTING)
DRAINAGE MAP (PROPOSED)
,,,,..
,,...
C -
--
-
INTRODUCTION
The proposed project site is located in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego. The project is
located at on the southeast side of Pine A venue between Roosevelt Street and Madison Street. It is
bordered to the northwest by Pine Avenue, to the northeast by an unnamed alley, to the southeast
by existing developed property and southwest by Roosevelt Street. The Assessor's Parcel number
for the project lot is 204-082-01-00. The project proposes grading and improvements for four
residential condominium units. This drainage study calculates the peak stormwater discharge
entering and leaving the project site (onsite and offsite drainage) in the existing condition and after
development.
PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION
The project proposes 4 residential attached condominium units. Each unit will have a two-car garage with
access from a driveway which is entered from Roosevelt Street. The project proposes four on-street guest
parking spaces on the southeast side of Pine A venue. There is no on-street parking in Roosevelt Street.
-
-
-
-
METHODOLOGY
Storm water runoff was calculated using the Rational Method as outlined in the San Diego County
Hydrology Manual, dated June 2003. Stonnwater runoff was calculated for an existing and post-
development condition resulting from the 100-year, 6-hour storm event for the project and its
drainage area. Standard intensity-duration curve data was used for the San Diego region supplied
in the Manual.
The soil group used for the site and in the drainage area is soil hydrologic Group B from Map Soil
Hydrology Groups in County Hydrology Manual.
EXISTING CONDITION HYDROLOGY
The existing project site drainage area is approximately 0.420 acres. The site varies in elevation
from a high of 39.90 at a point on the southeast property line to a low elevation of 39.02 at the
northeast corner of the project site and to the lowest elevation of 37.48 at the POC in the cross-
gutter of Roosevelt Street. The calculation, the 0.420 acre drainage area in the existing condition
is divided into 2 separate basins (see Drainage Map (See Drainage Map (Existing)) each described
as follows:
Area E 1 is a portion of the northeast half of Roosevelt Street and a southwesterly portion of the
property on the southeast side of Pine A venue Street that flows to the northeasterly gutter
in Roosevelt Street and then northwesterly in the gutter away from the site. The
stonnwater flows to POC#l at a point in the northeasterly gutter of Roosevelt Street and
confluences with stonnwater from Area E2 described below. The runoff flows
northwesterly to the southwesterly gutter of Oak A venue the surface flow southwesterly
along Oak A venue through a series of cross gutters toward the Pacific Ocean.
Area E2 is a portion of the southeast half of Pine A venue Street, a northeasterly portion of the
property on the southeast side of Pine A venue Street and the full width of the unnamed
alley that flows to the southeasterly gutter in Pine A venue and then southwesterly in the
gutter away from the site. The stonnwater flows to POC#l at a point in the northeasterly
gutter of Roosevelt Street and confluences with stormwater from Area El described
above. The runoff flows northwesterly to the southwesterly gutter of Oak A venue the
surface flow southwesterly along Oak Avenue through a series of cross gutters toward the
Pacific Ocean.
--
-
-
-
C
-
METHODOLOGY (continued)
POST-DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGY
The project site drainage area is approximately 0.420 acres.
The calculations for, the 0.420 acre drainage area that is graded or disturbed is divided into 2
separate basins (see Drainage Map (See Drainage Map (Proposed)) each described as follows:
Area Pl is portions Area El and Area E2 that flows to the northeasterly gutter in Roosevelt Street
and then northwesterly in the gutter away from the site. The stormwater flows to POC# 1
at a point in the northeasterly gutter of Roosevelt Street and confluences with stormwater
from Area E2 described below. The runoff flows northwesterly to the southwesterly gutter
of Oak A venue the surface flow southwesterly along Oak A venue through a series of cross
gutters toward the Pacific Ocean.
Area P2 is portions Area El and Area E2 that flows to the southeasterly gutter in Pine Avenue and
then southwesterly in the gutter away from the site. The stormwater flows to POC#l at a
point in the northeasterly gutter of Roosevelt Street and confluences with stormwater from
Area El described above. The runoff flows northwesterly to the southwesterly gutter of
Oak A venue the surface flow southwesterly along Oak A venue through a series of cross
gutters toward the Pacific Ocean.
-
--
-
-
-
--
HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS
Area< 0.5 square miles. Use Rational Formula Q100 = CIA
~ = N33 ° O 9' 2 8 . 9 4"
A= Wll 7 ° 2 O' 4 3 . 5 6"
From Hydrology Manual Soils Map -Soils Group B
Developed Site (Existing) 33.2% impervious
Commercial & Residential (Proposed) 76.7% impervious
C = 0.47
C = 0.56
From INTENSITY-DURATION DESIGN CHART Loo= 6.59 in/hr. Tc= 5min
Iz= 2.90 in/hr. Tc= 5min
From Existing Drainage Map
POC#l
Area El:
Area E2:
Area El:
Area E2:
From Proposed Drainage Map
POC#l
Area Pl:
Area P2:
POC#l Area Pl:
Area P2:
Area E 1 = 0 .15 5 acre
Area E2 = 0.265 acres
0.420 acres
Qwo =CIA= (0.47)(6.59)(0.155) = 0.48 cfs
Qwo =CIA= (0.47)(6.59)(0.265) = 0.82 cfs
1.30 cfs
Qz =CIA= (0.47)(2.90)(0.155) = 0.21 cfs
Qz =CIA= (0.47)(2.90)(0.265) = 0.36 cfs
0.57 cfs
Area Pl = 0.155 acres
Area P2 = 0.265 acres
0.420 acres
Q100 = CIA= (0.56)(6.59)(0.155) = 0.57 cfs
Q100 =CIA= (0.56)(6.59)(0.265) = 0.98 cfs
1.55 cfs
Qz =CIA= (0.56)(2.90)(0.155) = 0.25 cfs
Qz =CIA= (0.56)(2.90)(0.265) = 0.43 cfs
0.68 cfs
••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••
10.0 ,.....,,...........,.....,.....,......,.......,.,.--,.....,.-,-1-,-,--rr+,-rn'MTntT'1",'.rniTIITT!'TT'lfrnl'l"TlTT:TITT+-.-t1TT,r"IT!"TTT!T7tTITit
601 "-l ; "kl: F'k.F'i-'1:7",-N-L'"i•P"K.i l 11 llliili!lll l 11111 : 1:; I Ill: I
2.0
I i i l'iJ : I i I f II~ 11 : fTtiml I I mtH{I I ~; Hfl~~; 11 . 1 I I II l I; 1111111
Ol ::i:
:5 : i , . ,, ..... j.J I I . ~rk.l 1 '1'! t li-'I ! N I I 1'JI' Plr:s ,-..,~1'11 r-1 ·t "'' f".,•,1 11· !· g
0 ' ' I l'r-, I; i1' I I ' II I J JI 'I ' I • r,. I .. ' -, f: I I ' : I ' ' ' '' I I"' I 1' ·, ... ' I ' -;.. ,,..., ' :\l :ll ' · 1 ', , 'Iii , I r-, ~ ' 1 ,~J' ro
g10 , 1 1 : 1 ! ,~ .. ~ ;11 , n~ : l1tt 1,1:1.~~:; 1-~ ,,~~i. 1+1
• 6.0~
"""o.9 I 1 ; ! i 1 , ~K.li I I : N-:, , l l.':'!,.l.lld ld~ 1 N 7' :1-J N-i lf'! 11:ii 5.5 ~
~ ; I I I , ; ;; N :I i 'ti .: !II '!!NI-., i !"'N. I "r-J . : !l's11 5.0 g
ffi0,8 'I. I i I,' 1-1. ! I! ,,, 1.:J ll,ilq,.,'i---l 17 I ~-i \i-i..l]: .!1 1 4.5'§' +-Q.7 , , , , · · , ,,, tr,ir. :·!i ! 1"'-.. 1 , ,lfi,1
E I ' i 1. ! I ' ,, :· I 1 .. i ••;• 1111• "1 ·•~q ' ! N.; ' I '~I ''I'• 40 g. I , I I' II N, , ' !I I , . I , ! . ~ , ' NJ , · ro 0.6 1 1 ~ t ; ~ 1 , 1 : ; : ; I:: ~ i 1 '. i : I : t : ; 1 : : 3.5 ~
I '. ' I ! I ·I 1',,.l! 11 'I I '; 11 , ,,.. : I ,... ...,,, I "' ; ' .. '' ,, I : I 'f'I' l!i I I l ' ' ,... f' l i I, 0.5 . I , : I I ,,!, 1 ii; ·:ii: , .... , , , ~ , I : ~ , :·~ 30
1 1 . :. , Ii ?s muih: N ' , 1 , ~! I rn ! I,; I I .,, :/1· ! , ! , ! "'j,.' ~
04 I ' L I ":ih '' ! ! ' "' ". l ,, 1,,1, 2.5 ' I I ' I '"l[ipi ~·• 'I ·~· ,,·,11'1' , , 1 I I 1 : 1!,q. r;..., i : 1 ~ i i ,l . ·
1 1 1 j 1!1 ! I I i ii,,; ! I ~I l I, '1-NJ J. i 2.0
03
-,.t
0,11 ! ! , I ~ ' "I I 1 " I I I ill l l •jl•ti •ll,,I ;' "l""i"""' "'' 'i I I ' j • ""' I""''
5 6 7 8 9 10 15 2.0 30 40 50 1 2 3 4 5 6
Minutes Hours
Duration
Intensity-Duration Design Chart -Template
Directions for Application:
(1) From precipitation maps determine 6 hr and 24 hr amounts
for the selected frequency. These maps are included in the
County Hydrology Manual (10, 50, and 100 yr maps included
in the Design and Procedure Manual).
(2) Adjust 6 hr precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within
the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr precipitation (not
applicapte to Desert).
(3) Plot 6 hr precipitation on the right side of the chart,
(4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines,
(5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location
being analyzed.
Application Form:
(a) Selected frequency _.!.QQ_ year
(b) p = 2.5 in. p = 4.1 ~ = 60.9 %<2) 6 --• 24 --•p -
(c) Adjusted P6<2> = ~ in.
(d) lx = _5_ min.
24
(e) I= ~ in./hr. Calculated by formula
Note: This chart replaces the Intensity-Duration-Frequency
curves used since 1965.
I P6 l 1.5 2 2.5 3 3,5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Ouro11on l I I I I I I I I ' l
5 2.63 3 95 5.27 6 59 7.90 9.22 10.5-1 1 i,86 '13.17' 14 49 15 81
7 2.12 3.18,424, 5.30 6.36,7.42 8.48 9.54 10.60 11.66'12.72
10 1.58 253 3.37 4.21 5.05 5.90 6.74 7.~8 8.42 9.27 10.11
1s 130 u,s· 2.59 324 -3.89 4.54 s . rn 5.84 6.49 7.13 , 7.78
20 1 08 1 62 2.15 2.69 3 23 3.7i' 4.3i 4.85 5.39 5.93 6.45
25 0.93 HO 1.87 2.33 .2,80 3.27 3.73 4,20 4.67 5.13 5.60
30 0.83 1.24' 1.66· 2.07 2.49 2.90 3.32 3.73 4.15 4.55 4 98
40 0.69 1 03, 1.38 I 72 2.07 2.41 2.76 3.10 3 -15 3.71] 4.13
50 0.60 0 90 'I 19 I 49 1 79 2 09 2 39 2.69 298 3.28 3.58
60 0.53 0 80 1,06 1.33 t.59. 1 86, 2 12 2.39 2.6S 2.92 3.18
90 0.41 061 0.82 1.02 1.23 1.43 1.63 1.84 2.04 2.25 2.45
120 0.3•1 0.51 0.68 0.85 102 I 19 1.36 1.53 1.70 1,87 2.04
150 0.29 0.44 0.59 0 73 , 0.88 1 03 1.18 1.32 1.47 1.62 1,76
180 0.26 0 39 0.52 0.65 0 78 0.91 1 04 1.18 1.31 1.44 1.57
240 0.22 0.33 0.43 0.54 . 0.65 O.i'G. 0.87 0.98 1.08 1.19 1.30
300 o. 19 o 2s o.:38 · 0.47 o 56 o 66 o.75 0.85 0 94 1.03 1.13
360 0.17 025 0,33 0 .. 12 0.50 0 58 0 67 0.75 0.84 0,92 1.00
FI GU R E ~
••• •••••••••••••••• ••••••••• ••••••••••••
100 ' · • I! , 'I· ', '· ",,, ,,,1 ! i Iii, ';Ii · ---..........1 • i j j · 1 1 ! : 1 1 ! i ; ;q. _ 1 I , \ ~ 1 \ ! j _N.1"-~~ ~ . , . ·, ,,., i',l:':' . 1, : lj, :j ,
9.o ......_. 1'. i~r i ·, J, .iJ !!J ::" : µ14;, : . ' !'!' JI:
80~j i--· . ..., ~fill i,r';~ II !1 J il ,I, i ! 1d!:11i 'i ! ' "" :Ii:
7.0 ,.. , • ,,_ , • ,... , 1 ., 1 Iii ' t t EQUATION I :I
I'-' '1'!:: I'-' '1 · '-4-N~?1f~:' 11 'll"l'"l ·II I' I I I: 1; 111111;1 6.0 ~ j I 17'[ -x_T ~ , t t !! 11 ! I I · ~, , = ?.44 P6 o·0.645
= Intensity (in/hr)
i I 'd' Tm • It
i1
2.o r,-+'~:-t-t-t-t-r~t-H+tfl'i~m lffi!:H+H-FH.i-H~~~~~J-kl~4-I-Wl++.,µ.;.1.W+i+jWLJJl.
O') ~ I ::\: ~ 0 0 C C ~ -~ ~ ro C n g 10 t--t-+-t-+-H-++-H +-t-+-t-rl-F,,,H+t++lffiH-H-i++H-++H#++t!'j~~~iri-+--'1~-l-l-"!,,,!-P~~~~~~ 6.0 'E.
~0.9 t--t-+-+-+-H-++-H+i-+-t+t++t+fN.l-lffiH-H-i++H-+'l'k:H+tl+l-l+H~-M,++cii-+~.+-i-+!'h--.~µ:.,1+-1=>.i.:,;J. 5.5 ~-
-~ o.Bt----t-+++H i-++H+t+f++++-H+H+~~+4-!+++H+l+-1.!-H.ll+!+l++~kl-+-l~.J-l-P~i-l-l~~~~.!J. 5 .. o g
El o 7 t--t-,--t-+-Hl-++-H +-t-+-t+t++t++H+itWH-m~H-++tt#+tl+l~+tr++l#+~l-+-l-l~i--1-i~J-H~~~.ll-4 .5 S-c · n 4,0 ffi
0.6 t--t-+++-H-++-t-++-t-+-t+t+t-H+t++-M4tt!+H-H-+~+l+tl+l+l+!+!-i+~i,,;-+-ii-+~..Wi--l-iH4,4,l~.W-W::iSI-3.5 ~
051 l : l 11 l : ! l :11:1:1111P!ll !IPillllllllllH:ql fltl~!L:.l:I I ;1 '1 11;TtNJ :l:i:l itl iffll 30
0-41 · 1 -, 1 1 , · 1 1 111T 111 w·1111r11111 ,11 11111;,•11111w·•n rrn,t. 1 · : 1 Ti'-1-J -11 : r~r 111 25
' f ~l ii { ,.J . I,!~;l ; l ~ I ! '1 1~ ~1! ~ 11l'i
2,0
03L L J t1 I
0.21 ! l , I i ;
.. 1.0
+ iy
01 1 '' 1 1 I ' 'I 1'"I""''11'1'"1""1"''1 ·"'I , 5 6 7 ~ 9 1'0 15 20 30 40 50 2
Minutes Hours
Duration
Intensity-Duration Design Chart -Template
Directions for Application:
(1) From precipitation maps determine 6 hr and 24 hr amounts
for the selected frequency. These maps are included in the
County Hydrology Manual (1 0, 50, and 100 yr maps included
in the Design and Procedure Manual).
(2) Adjust 6 hr precipitation (if necessary) so that it is within
the range of 45% to 65% of the 24 hr precipitation (not
applicaple to Desert).
(3) Plot 6 hr precipitation on the right side of the chart.
(4) Draw a line through the point parallel to the plotted lines.
(5) This line is the intensity-duration curve for the location
being analyzed.
Application Form:
(a) Selected frequency _2 __ year
p
(b) P6 :c _1.2_ in., P24 = _l_.8_ .~ ::= _§_]_ %(2)
24
(c) Adjusted p6(2l ::= _l_. l_ in .
(d) tx = _5_ min.
(e) I = -1.2Q_ inJhr. Calculated by formula
Note: This chart replaces the Intensity-Duration-Frequency
curves used since 1965.
PG 1 1.5 2 2,5 3 J,5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Duration I I I I I I I I I I l
5 263 395 5.27 659 7,90 922 10.54 11,86 1317 14491581
7 2. i2 3.18 4.24 5,30 6.36 7.42. 8.48 9,54 10,60, 11.66 12.72
10 I 68 2 :i3 3.37 4.21 5.05 5.90· 6.74 7.58 8A2 . 9 27 10.11
15 l.30 l 95 2.59 3.2.) 3.89 4.54 5.19 5.84 6,.19 ' 7.13 . 7.78
20 l.08 I 62 2, 15 2,69 3 23 3.77 4.31 4.85 • 6.39 , 5 93 • 6.46
25 0.93 1 40 1.87 2.33 2,80 3.27 3,73 4 20 • 4.67 '5.13 ' 5.60
30 0 83 l.24 1.66. 2.07 2.49 2.90 3.3:.! 3.7'.1 4.15 4.55 4,98
40 0 69 1 03 1 38 1.72 2.07 2.41 2 76 3.10 3 ,15 3,79 4.13
50 0,60 0.90 1.19 1.49 1 7~ 2.09 2.39 2.69 2.98 3,28 . 3.58 so o.53 oso· 1.00 1,33 1.59 1 86 2 12 2 39 2.65 2.92 ' 31a
90 0.4 l . 0 6 I 0.82 1.02 1.23 1 .43 1 6:l 1.84 2.04 2.25 2.J5
120 0.3'1 0.51 0,68 0.85 l.02 I 19 1 36 1.53 1.70 1 87 2,04
150 0.29 0 44 0.59 0.73 0.88 l 03 1 18 1.32 1 .47 1.62 1.76
180 0.26 0 39 0,52 0,65 0 78 0 91 1 04 1 18 1.31 1.44 1.57
240 0.22 0.33 0.43 0.54 0.65 0.76 0.87 0.98 1.08 1. HI 1.30
300 0.19 0 2s' O.:iS 0.47 0.56 0.66 0 75 0.85 0,94 1.03 1.13
360 0.17 0.25 0.3<3 0.-12 0 50 0 58 0 67 0.75 0.84 0,92 1.00
F IGUR E r ... . ..
l 3-1
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
r 1 . I . ,, i ·, I
j
I
·=;,.,,,,,..,.__,
+
J .. l.
\
L
C
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
:: . ---, -· L __ --J~t-,! -. .. ,. ~ -~-~ ~ ; -~--~-~ ;··. -L ~ j -' 1 ~ i ri,Y--JI .,# k r ---·r-~~~~~-;-·--------;~ -~ ., \ ;_,,-7':S I~-; -~ ~ _, i ~~~~= ~ I ~~~ .i ; --~--t"'""""'--.-.. i
. -6, '-· ~ ~ -" ' L .
""-;:_·#··1· -. '~
,'~ \ l ==
~-\~ , ' -
I I
-.. ------1--' 1
I
~-----+,•-· '
0
.,..._. ,_,...,,.k \)/
""I
>-----•-1= + ~~ ,
_, , -+-
.C:.. ! :
• ;---t,{.\;J Jc~ -~ 'W '
:-.. ,, 0 ) .... -.....; /
'I -_! ,n. r -· ■._)~. v+ --•
t 1 , 1..,0.::~v I Z ; • ---r--· t -t -~<(--:
'I : ' I I :W ··'i ···· ··· ·•· 1 ---i ---ttl·-+
<' • 10 ' ' ··-·; -'' --+-·-·-·· _, --t ,( ·-· _,_; --··-·--•. ~ I
( l
-~--"1
i I -+-!
' --+-··-
I
i r---r--
i . .. -r
w I-'
(f)
,._ .c ,q-N I ,._ >, 0 0 ~
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I ., # ,, ,
#
~ j<~
··,;:!, '
""'·,k
l
/1-. ,
#
# , , "',t"' , ' ..
T
r:Z
;(.) z w
l
'~--~ -c
r I
!
~ ; V
.. i '\
. .. ,.
'
,~· :~?'
.' =
i-.c \0 I i-;;.-, M
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
I
~-'!"'·•--_,,._-----;-
.. !
t ,t
~1 •
I
I
LO
~
0 en
C')
,,,,,._ · .. ·El
en z ;< w
C.)
0
/>/
\
_f r
L
L
l_
,, n n ' ' • ·1\ , n ~ 8 n z, n ;1 ,.
I ~ l -l n I\ 'ti ~ , .1 f'. .~ 1 1 :, J!Rt1"t 1·1-"t ; , ·: ~ I 4. J t J
San Diego County Hydrology Manual
Date: June 2003
Table 3-1
Section:
Page:
RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN AREAS
Land Use I Runoff Coefficient "C"
Soil T~ee
NRCS Elements Count Elements % IMPER. A B
Undisturbed Natural Terrain (Natural) Permanent Open Space 0* 0.20 0.25
Low Density Residential (LOR) Residential, 1.0 DU/A or less 10 0.27 0.32
Low Density Residential (LOR) Residential, 2.0 DU/A or less 20 0.34 0.38
Low Density Residential (LOR) Residential, 2.9 DU/A or less 25 0.38 0.41
Medium Density Residential (MOR) Residential, 4.3 DU/A or less 30® 0.41 0.45~ 0.47 Medium Density Residential (MOR) Residential, 7.3 DU/A or less 40 0.48 0.51
Medium Density Residential (MOR) Residential, 10.9 DU/A or less 45 0.52 0.54
Medium Density Residential (MOR) Residential, 14.5 DU/A or less 50 0.55 0.58
High Density Residential (HOR) Residential, 24.0 DU/A or less 65 0.66 0.67®
High Density Residential (HOR) Residential, 43.0 DU/A or less ([f.j) 0.76 0.77 .75 80
Commercial/Industrial (N. Com) Neighborhood Commercial 80 0.76 0.77
Commercial/Industrial (G. Com) General Commercial 85 0.80 0.80
Commercial/Industrial (O.P. Com) Office Professional/Commercial 90 0.83 0.84
Commercial/Industrial (Limited I.) Limited Industrial 90 0.83 0.84
Commercial/Industrial {Gerieral I.} General Industrial 95 0.87 0.87
C
0.30
0.36
0.42
0.45
0.48
0.54
0.57
0.60
0.69
0.78
0.78
0.81
0.84
0.84
0.87
3
6 of 26
D
0.35
0.41
0.46
0.49
0.52
0.57
• 0.60
0.63
0.71
0.79
0.79
0.82
0.85
0.85
0.87
*The values associated with 0% impervious may be used for direct calculation of the runoff coefficient as described in Section 3.1.2 (representing the pervious runoff
coefficient, Cp, for the soil type), or for areas that will remain undisturbed in perpetuity. Justification must be given that the area will remain natural forever (e.g., the area
is located in Cleveland National Forest).
DU/A = dwelling units per acre
NRCS = National Resources Conservation Service
Cp=0. 90x(%imper)+0im!)er( 1-¾imper) Exist Cp=0.90xt-)32)+.25(.668)=0.47
Proposed Cp=0.90x(.767)+.25(.233)=0.7S
3-6
l 1 rt
--
-
tt.:: -'
-
C
--
CONCLUSION
1. The proposed project does not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area. No flooding will occur due to development.
2. With no reduction in Time of Concentration, the peak Q at POC#l is increased from 1.30
cfs to 1.055 cfs, or by 0.25 cfs. Routing the flow of stormwater to and through the
driveway pavers further reduce the post-construction Q to less than or equal to pre-
construction which is satisfactory. The flow through landscape areas will treat the runoff
adequately. Added Time of Concentration will reduce Intensity sufficiently to also be
satisfactory.
3. The proposed project does not create or contribute any runoff water which would exceed
the current capacity of existing storm water drainage systems.
4. Hydrology Report Summary:
EXPECTED RUNOFF DISCHARGES (ii), 5 minutes
Outlet Tributary Area Ql00 Peak Q2 Peak Discharge
(Acres) Discharge ( cfs) (cfs)
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
POC# 1 Roosevelt 0.420 0.420 1.30 1.55 0.57 0.68
Total 0.420 0.420 1.30 1.55 0.57 068
Outlets shown are based on changes per development of the project site.
Storm water runoff was calculated using the Rational Method as outlined in the San Diego
County Hydrology Manual, dated June 2003. Stormwater runoff was calculated for an
existing and post-development condition resulting from the 100-year, 6-hour storm event for
the project and its drainage area. Standard intensity-duration curve data was used for the San
Diego region supplied in the Manual.
*POC#2 is the only one which requires mitigation to reduce Post to below Pre. See
conclusion no. 2 above.
-
-
CERTIFICTION
Report Preparation
I certify that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gathered and
evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage
the system or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, the information submitted is true, accurate, and complete.
'fl": CIVIL ENGINEER
C .,..
Lawrence E. Cole, RCE 36292
February 23, 2021
Date
C
-'
tr;
REFERENCES
1. County of San Diego Department of Public Works Flood Control Section, San Diego County
Hydrology Manual dated June 2003.
2. County of San Diego Stormwater Standards Manual.
cc,
v5
x
L,.J
------<t-,
EX. SIDE:WALK
C0
w---
x Cw
!
I
2 !:2.-
EX. n FH 9
EX. CON.C
270'±
I
' I
' / I
3
I
)
Ul
w -----
z < ;:,;
IL w
$ w w
o_ -
§;
x ~
I
<d
I
\
' I
+I c:,
~
1--
...J w > w
V)
0
0 a::
P1
2-3"PVC -t-
RSD f 27 ,:-:,. FL37. 9 ,
i
i
w
"' 65
x w
I p
c; z
8
' ,r ,
I: :-r",
i \_, w >
~
0 fr;
L'J
! ,-, 'L-L.... 1,...... __
! '----"
i:
I :: i!
ii !!
c:,
N ----i,;:g Vi---+
'/ ai,1.
i.,·--"'rt=='===i ,. V r . (Q....._
i ! i l : I
..
,-;::, ~
PROPOSED i WATER ESM'T
LANDSCAPE AREA
UNIT
FF 40.20
GF 39.85
2-CAR S
GE
1
4 4. ".
i'l
?"". ,,---; 8 i! J.------E:X. PLAN i t:.R z r_, n
w 6"X24" CUT-
OFF WALL
EX. BUiD:NG
(Fr 4-C.60)
LOT 1
BcGCK 40
;\/A? NO. 775
-----
FS40. O
LANDSCAPE AREA
LOT 16
UNIT 2
FF 40.20
GF 40.10
,..--.")
2-¾R s
AGE
4
w
PINE AVENUE
I
PROPOSED
CURB & GUTTER ",.
EX. CONC
tSMl• Cl .
LANDSCAPE AREA
w---
'
UNTT 3 P2 EX. PORC!-3 i
FF tQ.20
W
GF .
1
i0.10
11543.35 SF
0.265 AC
S 2-CAR
AGE
'NIT 4
FF 40.20
GF 39.85
No. 5097
Exp. 06/30/21
'N---
No.
X a..!..C
>-w
...J
...J
<(
u
8
X w
I
C: r..r; <
x
c;..J
w---
t IA ~
'
15 '±
' ,"'-[ -·:, !._\) !
I ,-, -,-~ ,-..
LJ: lj
REVISIONS
Description Approved Date
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SOP 2018-0014
,MS 2018-0011
~
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT AREA 6994.7419 SF
IMPERVIOUS AREA 3370 SF
48.2% IMPERVIOUS
LOT 15 AND 16 IN BLOCK 41 OF TOWN OF CARLSBAD, CITY OF CARLSBAD, IN
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP
THEREOF NO. 775, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN
DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 15, 1894.
THAT PORTION OF PINE AVENUE AS SHOWN ON AMENDED MAP OF THE TOWN
OF CARLSBAD, MAP NO. 775, SAID MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAIN_ SAN DIEGO CQUNTY_.__MORE_P...ARilCUl.AfilY. -DEScR"itJE!J AS FOLLOWS: ~ ~.
THE SOUTHERLY 10.00 FEET OF PINE AVENUE ADJOINING LOT 16, BLOCK 41 OF
SAID MAP NO. 775.
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER:
204-082-01 -00
DRAINAGE MAP (PROPOSED) FOR:
635 PINE A VENUE
Carlsbad, CA
PREPARED FOR:
TONY CASSOLATO
576 CAMINO ELDORADO
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
PH. (619 823-3602
L
E
C
LANDMARK ENGINEERING
CORPORATION
3443 Camino Del Rio South
Suite 204
San Diego, CA 92108
(619) 260-0420
Sht 1 of 1 Date: 21/-Z."?>fZ.i. Dwn. MC Apr. LEC Dwg. No. 2462-SD-1
EX STCP P
SIGN
(Sa) ] i r ---Y
~-,I
C/)
------I
c::)
~
=5 < "' L._j
C,
u'j
x u
'
,-,
( 0 \ \___ 'J '-\..--..
\~
' '? \~ \' . ' \--.:'!, ·~. .<"
i I I I i i ,.
'I " ~ • ' :::r:::8:'.: ::c::;::! :=: ,-Ucc,
"' i'.:J<>c
-:,1 :~1 -~, \' <].'='' !_J\. )
I
~ 2:.
!..,J z :s
·:...w
"' m
x w
40'
I
!
I
)
I
\
t--.....J
LL.I > w
V)
0
0 a::::
\
,____,_j
"' 65
x
I !
I
' \ !
~ cc :::::...
i
\40'
\ s-.'.2-
:z 8
x L: • .'
u z 8
x LJ
I _;..;·
' .
'
EX.
W~i
C
I
I
r1
/ ! r I ! l
' ¾
EX. Cct<C
---(38)-
1 -1-"" ;,, ·-.~ ) :~
r 1·_;_.I
I'-!---
! x
~= 1: --~---
-
E1
6741.52 SF
0.155 AC
I'·
X~'
\
\
,-_ jr-7---py Pl Pf1TC:-~ 0:.,...; _,,. ,_,,,1..,\
:2; Ld
l'-----
LOT 16
LOT 15
I
DiRT
BLOCK 4
MAP NO. 775
fv':AP 1\0.
LOT !
3L0Cl{ 40
:V:AP NO. 775
PINE
I D~. :::.o[,;C
CLOSED II~
PAT;O
EX. BLDG
AVENUE
i i
--------
I
EX. H8USE
FF 4:.93 X
y r--: --,.,,..,
u· z
8
2 i
'
0.-$'1 1-----------------------'·_i -i(:ic;; . .-
'· --Ji ! /l's
BENCH MARK
CLSB-130 (SEE ROS 17271)
SET 2.5" DISK IN SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF DRAINAGE BOX INLET AT THE END OF
CURB RETURN IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF GRAND AVENUE AND WASHINGTON ST.
NGVD29 ELEV,: 40.91 0
No.
I
EX. CGl<C
X LJ
x k.:
>-yJ
.J
....J :,,<C
,--~37 -,Y
u z
Q u
'
x -
/
~
.,_..-\ ,~-~;,-,--, 1/
LCT 4 7
REVISIONS
Description Approved Date
/
SiTE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SDP 2018-0014
MS 2018-0011
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT AREA 8396.56 SF
IMPERVIOUS AREA 2822 SF
33.6% IMPERVIOUS
LOT 15 AND 16 IN BLOCK 41 OF TOWN OF CARLSBAD, CITY OF CARLSBAD, IN
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP
THEREOF NO. 775, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN
DIEGO COUNTY, FEBRUARY 15, 1894.
THAT PORTION OF PINE AVENUE PS SHOWN ON AMENDED MAP OF THE TOWN
OF CARLSBAD, MAP NO. 775, SAID MAP RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAIN SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY ---DE:SCRfBl:[) AS ~FOI..L.OWS: ~~ -------~ -
THE SOUTHERLY 10,00 FEET OF PINE AVENUE ADJOINING LOT 16, BLOCK 41 OF
SAID MAP NO. 775.
ASSESSOR"S PARCEL NUMBER:
204-082-01 -00
DRAINAGE MAP (EXISTING} FOR:
635 PINE A VENUE
Carlsbad, CA
PREPARED FOR:
TONY CPSSOLATO
576 CAMINO ELDORADO
ENCINITAS, CA 92024
PH, (619) 823-3602
L
E
C
LANDMARK ENGINEERING
CORPORATION
3443 Cami.no Del Rio South
Suite 204
San Diego, CA 92108
(619) 260-0420
Sht 1 of 1 Date:8/07/18 Dwn. MC Apr. LEC Dwg. No. 2462-SD-1