Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-01-21; City Council; ; City of Carlsbad Fiscal Year 2018-19 Annual Financial Audit Results~ CITY COUNCIL ~ Staff Report Meeting Date: To: From: Staff Contact: Jan. 21, 2020 Mayor and City Council Scott Chadwick, City Manager Kevin Branca, Finance Director kevin.branca@carlsbadca.gov, 760-602-2430 CA Review v-,C- Subject: City of Carlsbad Fiscal Year 2018-19 Annual Financial Audit Results Recommended Action Receive a presentation on the city's fiscal year 2018-19 annual financial audit results. Executive Summary The City of Carlsbad is required by the State of California to be audited by a certified public accountant (CPA) or public accountant, licensed by, and in good standing with, the California Board of Accountancy. This presentation will provide a summary of the city's fiscal year annual financial audit results, including the auditor's opinion, any auditor findings, and highlights from the city's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for fiscal year 2018-19. Discussion The Finance Department is r~sponsible for the stewardship of the city's assets and liabilities, helping to ensure information is provided in an effective and timely manner so that the best financial decisions can be made. An important component of this stewardship role is the completion of the city's annual financial audit by a CPA firm. Results of the Fiscal Year 2018-19 Audit In May 2017, city staff selected and issued a five-year contract to Davis Farr LLP, a certified public accountant firm, to perform the city's annual financial audit. The role of the external auditor is to express an opinion on the city's financial statements on whether they are materially misstated or not. The external auditors follow Government Auditing Standards that have been created by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The fiscal year 2018-19 audit began in May 2019 with the external auditors conducting interim fieldwork, and the audit concluded on December 5, 2019, when the auditors issued their opinion on the city's financial statements. The city received an "unmodified" opinion, which means that it is the auditor's judgment that the city's financial statements and footnotes are fairly stated, without any material exceptions, and in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The auditor did not identify any material weaknesses in internal controls nor any material instances of noncompliance. The auditors made recommendations on how the city could Jan. 21, 2020 Item #2 Page 1 of 6 improve its internal controls through a separately issued report. These recommendations and management's responses were: 1. Reduce the number of prior period adjustments. Although the city only had two prior period adjustments, the city understands the importance of recording transactions in the manner prescribed by GAAP. 2. Continue to evaluate whether older developer deposits can be refunded to developers or escheated to the city. The finance department will continue to work with the construction management and inspection department as well as the city attorney's office to determine the disposition of older developer deposits. 3. Enhance the reporting capabilities of a city's nevvly implemented parks and recreation registration system. The city wil.l partner with the new software vendor for parks and recreation (CivicRec) to develop reports to assist in the balancing of deferred revenues, accounts with credit balances, and credit card charges to ensure that the balances in these accounts can be supported. Citywide Financial Results The city's revenues have continued to remain strong during this exceptionally long economic expansion since the ~'Great Recession." The city's "big three" revenue sources are property, sales, and transient occupancy taxes: • In the most recent four fiscal years, property taxes have shown significant growth. An increase in fiscal year 2018-19 of 5.4 percent in total assessed values, including residential, commercial and industrial properties, led to higher property tax revenues. This was the fourth year in a row since the recession the city saw growth in all three assessed value components. • Sales tax revenues were up significantly for the year. The state recently implemented a new system that impacted the timing of sales tax revenues for the year. Sales tax revenues for the previous fiscal year were artificially low due to this system conversion; however, the city was made whole in fiscal year 2018-19. • Higher room and occupancy rates throughout the city, as well as the addition of two new hotels (the second LEGOLAND Hotel and the Westin Hotel) led to higher transient occupancy taxes for the year. Additionally, the city implemented a new business license system in November 2016, creating timing differences in the receipt of license revenues. Fiscal year 2018-19 saw the second full year using the new system. During this transition to the new system, additional resources were allocated to the team to ensure timely processing of new business license applications and renewals, generating additional revenues for the fiscal year as compared to the prior fiscal year. As expected, development slowed down during fiscal year 2018-19, but remained relatively strong for the year. The city saw infill residential development as well as some of the last remaining master planned community development. There was very little commercial and industrial development during the year. Jan. 21, 2020 Item #2 Page 2 of 6 Income from investments were heavily impacted by three factors: required accounting adjustments1, an increase in the average yield on the treasurer's portfolio for the year, and an increase in the average daily cash balance in the General Fund for the year. These three factors combined created a significant increase in income from investments. Flat rates for water and wastewater combined with a reduction in water consumption led to lower charges for services for the year. A decrease in the donation of developer constructed assets (roads, pipelines, sidewalks, etc.) and a reduction in developer impact fees due to lower level of development throughout the city led to the decrease in capital grants and contributions. · The total cost of all programs and services was approximately $266.8 million in fiscal year 2018- 19, moderately higher (4.5 percent) than the fiscal year 2017-18. During the fiscal year, the City Council approved a new budget surplus policy that changed how unspent appropriations from one fiscal year are carried forward into the next fiscal year. With this change, city departments focused on completing projects and procuring planned items before fiscal year end. This accelerated costs that were incurred in fiscal year 2018-19 as compared to previous fiscal year. Several other factors that influenced the change in expenses during the fiscal year: • General government expen~es were lower from a smaller supplementary Cal PERS payment made on the city's miscellaneous plan, but partially offset by higher personnel costs due to personnel increases. • The increase in public safety expenses was driven predominantly by two factors: an additional CalPERS payment of $14.2 million partially offset by required annual pension accounting adjustments. • Community services expenses were impacted by required annual pension accounting adjustments, general salary and benefit increases, and additional focus on code enforcement. • Normal salary and benefit increases combined with inflationary impacts on maintenance, operations and capital expenses played a predominant role in higher business-type activities expenses for the year. General Fund Highlights The General Fund is the main operating fund of the city, and at the end of the fiscal year had a total fund balance of $185. 7 million, an increase of $6.6 million. The unassigned fund balance portion of the General Fund was $101. 7 million, an increase of $19.1 million from last fiscal year. This information is useful in assessing the city's financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balances may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. The major drivers of this change were revenues exceeding expectations and the new budget surplus policy, partially offset by additional CalPERS payments. 1 Government Accounting Standards require investments to be adjusted to fair market value as of June 30, 2019. Investment markets improved throughout the year; however, the recognition of the gains in fiscal year 2018~19 are artificial as the city's Investment Policy of holding investments to maturity. Jan. 21, 2020 Item #2 Page 3 of 6 Property taxes, transient occupancy tax, sales tax, business license taxes, franchise fees, income from property and investments drove the revenue growth of the city. The economy continues to remain strong. This was evident as all the tax revenues in the city saw moderate to significant growth during the year. As expected, development activity within the city saw a moderate decrease (charges for services and licenses and fees), after a relatively strong 2017- 18 fiscal year. With the city approaching buildout, several of the remaining large residential master planned communities and industrial/commercial parks saw a reduction in construction activity as they neared completion, leaving only a small portion of the city undeveloped. This slower pace is projected to continue and cause a further revenue decline for the foreseeable future as the city approaches buildout. Operations and maintenance expenses finished lower than budgeted and the new budget surplus policy reduced the amount of carry forward budgets from fiscal year 2018-19 to fiscal year 2019-20 by $6.9 million. Included in fiscal year 2018-19 expenses is the city's additional $20 million Cal PERS payment, impacting the General Fund ($5.1 million towards general government and $14.2 million public safety2). Additionally, community services were impacted by the full year operation of the Pine Avenue Community Center: additional focus on homeless programs, higher nuisance abatement costs, new library programs, and an update of the Schulman Auditorium sound system. Another change driving the general government results was the change made in the accounting for billing services provided by the finance department for the city's enterprises which also impacted interdepartmental charges. Enterprise Funds Highlights Enterprise funds are used to report activities that provide business-type services, generally to external customers -such as water, wastewater, solid waste, and golf services. The purpose of the city's enterprise fund financial sections is to provide short-and long-term financial information about the city's business-type activities. The analysis focuses on the determination of operating income, changes in net position (cost recovery), financial position, and cash flows .. Water funds had an operating loss of approximately $3.9 million for the year. Operating revenues were approximately $47.5 million and operating expenses were approximately $51.4 million. One of the larger factors in the operating loss was the decrease in volume of water sales, which was directly attributable to almost three times more rainfall in the current year. Water rates were increased in January 2017 and held flat during 2018 and 2019. The cost of purchased water from the Metropolitan Water District and the San Diego County Water Authority (suppliers of the city's potable water) continued to increase. The decrease in purchased water, and the purchase of costlier desalinated water, were offset primarily by an additional payment made to Encina (the operator of the recycled water facility) to assist in paying off their Cal PERS unfunded liability. Increases in income from investments and property taxes resulted in income before transfers and capital contributions of $5.2 million. In the twelfth year of operation, the Golf Course Fund had an operating loss of $3.1 million, primarily due to depreciating the enterprise's assets ($3.S million). If golf course operating revenues are not sufficient to cover golf course operating expenses (excluding depreciation), 2 The city used $5.S million of funds previously set aside (assigned) for Cal PERS stability to help make this payment. Jan. 21, 2020 Item #2 Page 4 of 6 the General Fund will make contributions in the form of lease payments to pay for the shortfall. This was the second year in a row that the General Fund did not make a lease payment to the Golf Course Fund; a direct result of paying off the golf course bonds in fiscal year 2016-17. Revenues remained strong in the current year, but an increase in course maintenance and personnel expenses drove a lower operating result. The Wastewater Funds had an annual operating loss of $1.1 million for the fiscal year. Total revenues from operations were up due primarily to development throughout the city. The increase in operating expenses was predominantly due to an additional payment made towards the unfunded CalPERS liability and a depreciation true-up at Encina, the operator of the wastewater treatment facility. Non-operating revenues related to income from investments added $1.7 million to the operating income, resulting in a net gain of $593,000 before transfers and capital contributions. Solid Waste Operations and Storm Water Programs are combined on the city's financial reports and showed a net operating loss of $256,000 for the year. Revenues were essentially the same as the previous fiscal year, and expenses increased due to planned increases in outside professional service costs. The operating loss was more than offset by income from investments, which resulted in a net gain before transfers and capital contributions of $294,000. The unrestricted net position for the Water, Golf Course, Wastewater, and Solid Waste Operations at the end of the year amounted to $96.6 million, or approximately 20 percent of the total enterprise funds net position. The unrestricted net position may be used for rate stabilization, fluctuations in operating expenses, and unforeseen repairs and maintenance. Approximately $38.5 million, or 8 percent, of the net position of all the enterprise funds are restricted for the future capital construction of new and replacement water and wastewater infrastructure assets. Since the funding for the replacement of infrastructure assets is not restricted, it is reflected in the Statement of Net Position as unrestricted. The city does, however, account for and monitor these amounts in separate funds to ensure that water and wastewater assets can be replaced when needed. The large unrestricted net deficit in the Golf Course Fund represents funds advanced from the city's General Fund that were used to fund construction, former operating losses and debt expenses of the municipal golf course. Fiscal Analysis This is an informational item with no fiscal impact. Next Steps Receive and accept staff presentation. Environmental Evaluation (CEQA) Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21065, receiving this annual report does not constitute a "project" within the meaning of CEQA in that is has no potential to cause either a direct or indirect physical change in the environment, or a reasonable foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and, therefore, does not require environmental review. Jan. 21, 2020 Item #2 Page 5 of 6 Public Notification This item was noticed in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and was available for public viewing and review at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled meeting date. Exhibit None. Jan. 21, 2020 Item #2 Page 6 of 6