No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLFMP 02; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 02; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 2; 1987-05-20Number 1 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 2 City Council Resolution No. 9123 Dated June 16, 1987 Planning Commission Resolution No. 2660 Dated May 20, 1987 AMENDMENTS Date I Reso. No. Subject(s) 8/3/87 CC/9144 Foote Development Agreement I I AMENDMENT # 1 (10 pages} AGREEMENT FOR PROVISION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AFFECTING ISSUANCE AND USE OF BUILDING PERMITS. THIS AGREEMENT is made this ~ day of ~ , 1987, between the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to as CITY, and the FOOTE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY hereinafter referred to as DEVELOPER. RECITALS WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Plan provide.s that building permits may not issue until all necessary public facilities are constructed or otherwise guaranteed as required by the Local Facilities Management Plan; and WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Manaqernent Plan has been approved by the City Council for Zone 2 which identifies certain public facilities deficiencies which must be remedied prior to the issuance of any building permits; and WHEREAS, developer has secured a final map for CT 84-35, a 151 unit residential subdivision located in Zone 2; and WHEREAS, developer wishes to assume responsibility for the correction of all the existing deficiencies and wishes to obtain building permits for his project so that the houses can be constructed at the same time the necessary public facilities are being constructed recognizing that the houses will not be occupied until all the necessary public facilities are available thereby avoiding a further burdening of the City's public facilities capacities and ensuring compliance with the Growth Management Ordinance. -1- NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and mutual obligations of the parties as herein expressed, City and Developer agree as follows: 1. Developer will pay the City $42,500.00 for improvements to the intersection of Elm Avenue at El Camino Real as required by the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2. The City will use this money to supplement the existing construction contract for work in the area and will assume the responsibility for completing the improvements. 2. Developer will deposit $270,000.00 with the City, which is the estimated cost of making the improvements to the intersection of Tamarack Avenue at El Camino Real as required by the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2. City will assume responsibility for constructing these improvements. When the Citywide Traffic Study is completed a judgement will be made by the City Council as to the exact nature and extent of these improvements. The existing estimate will be refined at that time. Any deposit in excess of the refined estimate will be returned to developer. If the deposit is not sufficient to cover the refined estimate then Devel~per shall promptly deposit any additional funds required. Any payments by developer pursuant to this section shall satisfy his obligation for the improvements. -2- 3. Developer shall immediately commence construction of any necessary upgrades to the El Camino Real Kelly Sewer Interceptor to accommodate flows from Zone 2 and Zone 7 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This work shall be diligently pursued to completion by developer. Developer shall guarantee the construction of the sewer improvements by furnishing a Letter of Credit in a form acceptable to the City Attorney in the amount of $75,000.00. In connection with the construction developer shall maintain a liability insurance policy naming the City as an additional insured as required by the Risk Manager covering all aspects of the work to be performed by developer or a sub-contractor, developer may obtain the release of the posted security on completion of the project in accordance with the City Standard Subdivision Practice. Upon completion and acceptance of the work, the City will pay developer $29,427.00 which the parties agree is the City's share of the project. 4. After this agreement is executed and after developer pas deposited the funds required by · Sections 1 and 2 and furnish the security required by Section 3 then subject to compliance with all applicable laws, the City shall issue building permits for developer's project. -3- s. Developer shall not occupy or allow occupancy of any of the houses constructed pursuant to building permits issued in accordance with this agreement and shall neither request, secure or permit: (a) A final building inspection of the structure1 (b) Installation of a water meter1 or (c) Installation of any gas or electric meter for any of the houses, until completion of both the sewer improvements required by paragraph 3 and the Elm and El Camino Real street improvements required by paragraph 1 has been certified in writing by the City Engineer as complete and operational. Temporary electric power for construction will be permitted only from temporary construction poles or .pedestals. Developer agrees to comply with all of the provisions of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone·2 and the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. 6. Further, developer understands the City Building Department will not schedule the foundation inspection or framing inspection on any of the houses to be constructed by developer unless the City Engineer certifies in writing that adequate progress is being made by developer toward completing the sewer improvements. Prior to the utilities inspection and release of utilities the City Engineer.must certify that all of the public improvements ieauired by this agreement have been -4- completed. No units will receive final inspection prior to this certification. 7. Developer understands that this agreement notwithstanding should any of the public facilities necessary to serve this project fall below the adopted Citywide Performance Standard in the future all previously available but unissued building permits will not be issued until those deficiencies can be corrected. B. If developer wishes to sell any of the houses prior to final inspection he must comply with the disclosure provisions of this section. Any prospective purchasers must be made aware of the fact that they may not ~e able to occupy the house on it's completion because of the provisions of this agreement at the time a specific buildiing permit is issued. A copy of this agreement shall be available to each prospective buyer and developer shall obtain a signed acknowledgment and receipt that the buyer has read and understands the agreement. The receipts must be filed with the Community Development Director. After completion of the sewer improvements and the Elm Avenue improvements and provided no other public facilities deficiencies have been identified prior to building permit issuance, then the Community Development Director shall have authority during the time that situation prevails of waiving the -s- disclosure requirement for any particular house. 9. This agreement is intended to resolve any possible dispute between developer and City in regards to his development. Developer waives the right to litigate anything that's happened in the past in regards to this development and agrees to hold the City harmless and waive any rights to litigate in the future any matters arising out of this agreement. 10. Developer shall be entitled to a credit against the traffic impact fees required to be paid as a condition of the issuance of his building permits. The amount of the credit shall be equal to the monies required to be paid by developer pursuant to this agreement. As each building permit for the development is pulled the traffic impact fees due shall be deducted from this amount. When the project is complete and the credit has otherwise been adjusted as necessary for the Tamarack and El Camino Real improvements, then the City Engineer shall determine the amount remaining to be reimbursed to developer. City agrees to use it's best efforts to collect traffic impact fees from other developers building in Zone 2 and agrees to pay any amounts received on a monthly basis to developer until the remaining reimbursement amount has been satisfied. This reimbursement would include any additional funds collected from other -6- developers in Zone 2 should the permanent traffic impact fee be established. at a higher rate than the interim fee. No interest will be due on the reimbursement amount. ll. Developer expressly warrants that he is the owner of record or duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the land subject to this agreement and described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (•The Property•). 12. Applicant shall record this agreement as affecting title to the property in the office of the County Recorder, County of San Diego, California and provide the City with a copy of the recorded agreement prior to the issuance of any building permits. 13. Provided all requirements of the Growth Management Plan have been satisfied the City shall provide the Developer with a written release of this agreement for each house upon completion of the iroprovements required by this agreement. The form of (the release) agreement shall be prepared by Foote Development Company's Title Company and be approved by the City within 45 days of this agreement. 14. No amendment, modification, supplement, termination or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless executed in writing by both parties and then only in the specific instance and for the specific purposes given. -7- 15. Any demand upon or notice required or permitted to be given by one party to the other party shall be in writing. Except as otherwise provided by la~, any demand upon or notice required or permitted to be given by one party to the other party shall be effective (a) on personal delivery, (b) on the second business day after mailing by certified or registered United States mail, return receipt requested, or (c) on the succeeding business day after mailing by Express mail or after deposit with a private delivery· service of general use (e.g., Federal Express) postage or fee paid as appropriate, addressed to the party at the address shown below. Developer: City: Michael J. Foote Foote Development Company 5205 Kearny Villa Way, Suite 211 San Diego, California 92123 City of Carlsbad Community Development Office 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, California 92009 Attention: Community Development Director Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice the manner set forth in this paragraph. 16. This Agreement and all rights and obligations contained herein shall be in effect whether or not any or all parties to this Agreement have been succeeded by another entity, and all riqhts and -8- obligations of the parties signatory to this Agreement shall be vested and binding on their successor of interest. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first written above. CITY OF CARLSBAD A Municipal Corporation of the State oiC?/i~j , ~· : By: ~,c' ;· Y(( -/' ~-7 ~DE A. LEWIS, Mayor City of Carlsbad CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NO. 202 ! State of California County of San Diego •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• : Q OFFICIAL SEAL : : .·-KAREN R. KUNDTZ : : ' NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFO~NIA : : . . SAN o:EGo COUNTY • • My Comm. E•P. Sept. 27. 1989 : •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• On this the 3rd day of Karen R. Kundtz ----'A=u"'g=-u-=s-=t _____ 19..!!Z_, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared Aletha L. Rautenkranz 131 personally known to me D proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who executed the within instrument as City Clerk oron behalf of the corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ~na~tt 7120 122 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION• 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box 4625 • Woodland Hills, CA 91364 C'll Ml"-C r~"-'IC Ut:.YLLVrrY11...1,1 '-'-'•, 11-.'-•t l"'-...... , ..,.., ...................... -. ........ _ •. --- and acknowJedgPd to me that such corporation executed the within instrument pur~uant to its bylaws or a resolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OFFICIAL 'SEAL r'ATRICJA G C ABERNATHY NOTARY PUBLIC • CALIFORNIA SAN D1£GO COUNTY My romm. expires AUG 4, I 989 l-::~""""'-=--=--...:,,.;....~ .......... -._,~ _,.._. ~~ ~ C . ~~ Patricia G. c. Abernathy -Y- Map 11672 Lots 98 to 189 inclusive of Carlsbad Tract No. 84-35 Unit 2, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 11672, filed.in the Office of the County Recorder, December 11, 1986. Map 11673 Lots 190 to 248 inclusive of Carlsbad Tract No. 84-35 Unit 3, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 11673, filed in the Office of the County Recorder, December 11, 1986. -10- CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 2 Plan Sponsor: City of Carlsbad 1200 Elm Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008 (619) 438-5621 Preparer: Planning 0Ppartment City of Carlsbad 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 438-1161 Hay 20, 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II. Introduction •••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III. Buildout Projections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV. Phasing •••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• V. Zone Requirements for Public Facilities VI. and Services ...•.••.••..•••••..••••.... Analysis of Public Facilities and Improvements 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11 • City Administrati.ve Facilities ••••••••••• Adequacy Findings ••••••••••••••••••• Li brar)' .•.•.•.•..••...••.••.. Adequacy Findings •••••••••• . . . . . . . . . Wastewater Treatment Capacity. Adequacy Findings •••••••• . .... Parks ••.••••.••..••••• :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... Adequacy Findings •• Drainage ................ . Adequacy Findings ••• . . . ....... . Circulation ••••••••••••••• Adequacy Findings •• . . . . . . . . Fire ••..•••••••.••••..•• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adequacy Findings •• Open Space •••••••••••••• Adequacy Findings •• Schools .•••••••..••••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Adequacy Findings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Collection System ••••••••••••• Sewer Adequacy Findings •••••••••••• Distribution System. Water Adequacy Findings •••• i . . . . . . ........... Page No. 1 9 16 23 27 29 36 38 44 47 51 54 61 63 68 69 73 79 82 83 86 88 92 94 100 108 112 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. VII. Appendices Appendix 1 -Glossary.......................... 115 Appendix 2 -Growth Management Ordinance....... 122 Appendix 3 -Heference Sources................. 145 Appendix 4 -Acreage Summary................... 147 Appendix 5 -Buildout Arterial Improvements.... 149 Appendix ,, 0 -Planning Commission Resolution No. 2665 ............. . 154 -City Council Resolution No. 9123.............. 157 ii CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND EXHIBITS Local Facilities Management Plan Map •••••••••••••••••••• Publi.c Facilities Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••.••••••••• Local Facilities Management Plan Map/Zone 2 ••••••••••••• General Plan -Land Use Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••• Zoning Map •••.•••••••••••••.••••.••••••••••••••••••••••• Existing Land Use Categories, Exhibit A ••••••••••••••••• Approved Development Projects by Land Use Categories, Exhibit 8 ••••••••••••••••••.•••• Approved Development Projects, Exhibit C •••••••••••••••• Vacant Land Use Categories, Exhibit D •••••••••.••••••••• Buildout Population Projections ••••••••••••••••••••••••• Residential Phasing •••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Non-Residential Phasing ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••• City Administrative Facilities Page No. 2 5 12 13 14 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 Map............................................ 30 Summary Sheet.................................. 31 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 32 Five-Year CIP.................................. 33 Dwelling Unit and Population Projections, Exhibit E................................... 34 City Administrative Facilities, Exhibit F...... 35 Zone 4 Demand Comparison, Exhibit G............ 37 Library Map. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 39 Summary Sheet.................................. 40 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 41 Planning Projections, Exhibit H................ 43 Zone 4 Demand Comparison, Exhib 1 t I •••••••••••• · 46 iii CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND EXHIBITS (Continued) Wastewater Treatment Parks Drainage Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••. • ••• Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••• ~ •• Service Area Demand and Treatment Capacity •••• Park District Boundary Map •••••••••••••••••••• Map •••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••• Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••• Park Demand, Park District 2, Exhibit J ••••••• Park Demand, Zone 2, Park District 2, Exhibit K •••••••.•••••••••••••••..••...•... Drainage, Exhibit L ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Drainage Areas, Exhibit M ••••••••••••••••••••• Summar)' Sheet ......••..••••••••...•.••••......• Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••.•••• Circulation Fire Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••.•••• Propose Improvements El Camino Real at Elm Avenue ••••••••••••••• El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue •••••••••• Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Summary Sheet ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••• Open Space Map ••••••••••• · ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Summary Sheet ••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •••••••• iv Page No. 48 49 50 52 55 56 57 58 59 60 64 65 66 67 70 71 72 76 77 80 81 82 84 85 86 Schools CHARTS, MAPS, TABLES AND EXHIBITS (Continued) School District Boundary Map ••••••••••••••••••• Map •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Summary Sheet ...•••......•••..•................ Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••••••.. Page No. 89 90 91 92 Sewer Collection System Sewer District Boundary Map • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • 9 5 Map............................................ 96 Summary Sheet.................................. 97 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 98 El Camino Real/Kelly Drive Sewer System, Exhibit P........................... 102 Sewer Collection............................... 103 Sewer Demand, Table 2.......................... 104 Capacity of Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor, Table 3..................................... 105 Capacity of El Camino Real/Kelly Drive Sewer System, Table 4. •••••••••••...•••••••• 106 Capacity of North Agua Hedionda I~terceptor, Table 5..................................... 107 Water Distribution System Water Service Boundary Map..................... 109 Map............................................ 110 Summary Sheet.................................. 111 Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 112 Appendices Appendix 1 Traffic Impact Fee.......................... 120 Bridge and Thoroughfare District............ 121 Appendix 4 Acreage Summary Chart....................... 148 Appendix 5 Circulation Element......................... 153 V 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 ZONE 2 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 Cltw o1c., .. .., 0,owrft u-..mem Prot,.,.. JANUARY 1987 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2 was prepared pursuant to the City's Growth Management Program, Title 21, Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The contents of the plan follow the outline established by Section 21.90.110 of the Growth Management Ordinance. The Zone 2 plan ls consistent with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, and it implements the Citywide plan adopted September 23, 1986. The Zone 2 plan begins with the assumptions used to generate the buildout projections for residential and non- residential development within the Zone. The plan then phases or estimates the Zone's development on a yearly basis until bulldout. The phasing ls done to predict future facility demands. Each facility that is required to be addressed is then analyzed. The analysis includes an inventory of existing and proposed facilities, a phasing schedule that establishes the timing for the provision of facilities in relationship to demand, and a financing plan that establishes various methods of funding facilities and improvements that are Identified by the plan as needed. Since this Zone plan is a regulatory document, each facility section also contains conditions to ensure that public facilities will conform to the adopted performance standards. The conditions will be adopted as part of the Zone 2 approval, and mandatory compliance will regulate future development within the zone. The purpose of the summary chart shown below is to provide a brief synopsis of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2. City Ad■inlstratlve Library SUMMARY CHART Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard until the year 2005. Library space ls currently below standard. Until this ls brought into conformance, no residential development may occur in Zone 2 or in the City. 3 Wastewater Treat ■ent Capacity Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Syste ■ Water Distribution Existing facilities meet the adopted performance·standard. Park District 2 conforms with the adopted performance standard until the year 1996. Existing facilities currently meet the adopted performance standard. Two intersections in Zone 2 do not meet the adopted performance stan- dards. Until this is brought into conformance, no development shall occur. Existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard to buildout of Zone 2. Existing open space meets the adop- ted performance standard to buildout of Zone 2. Existing school facilities currently have the capacity to meet the the demand generated by Zone 2. The School District has indicated that it will be able to provide capacity to buildout of Zone 2. Existing sewer trunk line capacity does not comply with the adopted performance standard. Until this is brought into conformance, no deve- lopment shall occur in Zone 2. Water service to Zone 2 meets the adopted performance standard to the buildout of the Zone. 4 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) 11) N/A PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET Conformance with Adopted Standard Cit~wide Quadrant Zone 2 City Administrative Facilities Yes N/A N/A Library No* Presently below standard Wastewater Treatment Yes** Parks N/A Yes N/A Drainage N/A N/A Yes Circulation N/A N/A No* Fire N/A N/A Yes Open Space N/A N/A Yes Schools N/A N/A Yes Sewer Collection System N/A N/A No* Water Distribution System N/A NIA Yes = Not Applicable * These facilities do not conform with the adopted performance standards. Mitigation to bring these facilities into conformance are found in the next section "Special Conditions for Zone 211 , Pages 7 and 8 and discussed in further detail in each applicable Chapter. ** Based on Council adoption of interim wastewater treatment capacity policy. 5 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. All development within Zone 2 shall conform to the provisions of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions and conditions of this Local Facilities Management Plan. 2. All development within Zone 2 shall be required to pay a public facility fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council on April 22, 1986, and all other applicable fees. Development in Zone 2 shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance standard. 3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 2 pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. All development in Zone 2 shall be in conformance with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797. 5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 2 Local Facilities Management Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to add conditions and upgrade standards as determined through the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may be initiated by action of the Planning Commission or City Council at anytime. 6. If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an adopted performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Council determines that a non-conformance does exist then no future building or development permits, which would impact the facility, shall be issued until those facilities are brought into conformance with the adopted performance standard. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 2 The following Special Conditions apply specifically to development in Zone 2 and must be complied with in addition to the General Conditions for Zone 2. These conditions are also listed separately under the analysis discussion of each facility. City Ad ■lnlstratlve Facilities No special conditions are necessary at this time. 6 Library No residential building or development permits shall be issued in Zone 2 including those projects previously exempt under Section 21.90.030(c} of the Carlsbad Municipal Code until the City Council takes action approving measures which provide for library services to meet the adopted performance standards. Wastewater Treat•ent Capacity Development in Zone 2 must comply with City Council policy adopted by Resolution No. ____ , on May 19, 1987, which makes provisions for interim wastewater treatment capacity. Parks Although the performance standard is being met for Zone 2, several conditions are applicable to assure future planning of adequate park facilities in Zone 2: 1. Phase II development of Calavera Hills Park must be completed before 4,357 residential untis have received building permits within Park District 2. 2. Development shall continue to pay Park-In-Lieu fees and Public Facility Fees for Park District 2 to mitigate the future incremental parks demand within the District. Drainage No building or development permits shall be issued for any portion of Zone 2 which drains to the Buena Vista Creek unless it incorporates into the design of the project all conditions of the Buena Vista Lagoon and Watershed Sediment Control Plan, as prepared by June Applegate and Associates on September 3, 1985. Circulation The following intersections will require mitigation: 1. El Camino Real/Elm Avenue improvements include widening Elm Avenue at the intersection to provide an additional eastbound and westbound lane and widening El Camino Real at the intersection to the full width of a prime arterial (three through lanes and one left-turn-only. lane). This mitigation must be guaranteed for construction before any development in Zone 2 is allowed to proceed. 7 2. El Camino Real/Tamarack Avenue -improvements consist of restriping to provide optional through and turn lanes for the east and west approaches, widening of the southbound approach to provide one additional lane and widening the northbound approach to provide two left-turn-only, two right-turn-only and three through lanes. This mitigation must be guaranteed for construction before any development in Zone 2 is allowed to proceed. All future development within Zone 2 shall continue to pay Traffic Impact Fees and Public Facilities Fees. Fire No special conditions are necessary at this time. Open Space No special conditions are necessary at this time. Schools No special conditions are necessary at this time. Sewer Collection Syste■ Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor -Subbasin 2A Reaches E-4, F-1, and F-2 of the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor fail to meet the standard. No further development shall. proceed in Subbasin· 2A until agreement has been reached with the City of Vista and a schedule ls established for upgrading of the deficient reaches. El Camino Real/Kelly Interceptor -Subbasin 28 The El Camino Real/Kelly interceptor currently falls to meet the performance standards. No further development shall be allowed in Subbasln 2B until agreements or contracts have been executed to upgrade the deficient reaches. Water Distribution Syste ■ All development within Zone 2 shall pay the required Costa Real Municipal Water District fees. 8 9 INTRODUCTION I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Local Facilities Management Plan is to complete the second phase of the overall Growth Management Plan for Zone 2 within the City of Carlsbad. Phase One of the Growth Management Program established the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan based upon a phased buildout of the City's existing General Plan. For purposes of public facilities analysis, the City has been separated into 25 Local Facilities Management Zones as shown on "Local Facility Management Plan Boundaries", on Page 2. LOCAL PLAN OVERVIEW This plan for Zone 2 provides a detailed description and analysis of how this area of the City will develop from its current status to buildout. The plan also demonstrates how and when each facility and improvement will be constructed in order to accommodate development within the Zone (phasing). It also provides a complete description of how each facility and improvement will be financed when mitigation is necessary. The body of the plan is divided into separate sections for each public facility. In each section there will be a summary sheet which highlights the important information described in the analysis. This summary is broken down into three categories: Existing, Existing plus approved, and Future. The demand column in each of these categories will show two numbers: Demand li?3l The top number (1) represents the Citywide, Quadrant or Zone demand, dependin~ upon the public facility being evaluated. The lower number (2) represents the specific zone demand for the public facility, i.e., in this case, Zone 2. Followinq the summary sheet will be the detailed analysis and additional information for the public facility. If a facility is not conforming with the adopted performance standard, there will be a discussion describing this situation, a mitigation or alternatives section, and a financing discussion. Each facility subsection will conclude with a subsection, "Adequacy Findings". This section will summarize whether or not the public facility conforms with the adopted performance standard. 10 The plan for Citywide Facilities adopted performance development occurs. ZONE Z -OVERVIEW Zone 2 is consistent with all aspects of the and Improvement Plan and ensures that the standards shall be complied with as Zone 2 comprises about 800 acres in the northeast quadrant of the City. Bordered almost entirely by major roadways, i.e., El Camino Real to the west, Highway 78 to the north, Elm Avenue to the east, and Tamarack Avenue to the south, Zone 2 is considered an "in-fill" zone because much of it has been built, or ls in the process of developing. Zone 2 has within its boundaries existing developments such as the Von's and former Handyman shopping centers, the Tanglewood condominiums, and Larwin Park. A major powerline easement bisects the zone. Two recently approved housing developments, Falcon Hills (CT 84.-35) and Tamarack Point (CT 85- 14), are under construction in the southern portion of Zone 2. Future development could include some office uses along El Camino Real, and residential development between Haymar and Marron Roads, and at the corner of Elm Avenue and El Camino Real. The map, "General Plan Land Use", shown on Page 13, denotes the General Plan Land Use· for Zone 2. The accompanying land Use Zoning ls shown on Page 14. 1 1 ZONE 2 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 12 t Clly at Carlallilld 0,owtfl MWIIQel'lent Pr°"wn 5 JANUARY 1987 ZONE 1 IISIDlNTIAL RL UtW UF.N'iill"Y (O· l.'l 11.M l.l>W•MFIHIIM IJF.N~HY(0-4) RM Mfllll1M UF.N~HY(4·R) I I I RMII MFIJIITM IIIC.11 0f.NSHY (8-1') IUI UHill l>FNSlrt' ( 1'·23) COMMERCIAL Rltl IN I i!N'iil\.f. RFC.IONAL RETAIL (f'II Plara C:amlnn a.an IRE f'I( ll'N~l\'P RF(il(JNAI. REU,IL(«'II-CM (:uunt:rr cart,bad) R.11 RF.«;11,NAI.SFR\l'l("I! (; r:o,.tl!.ll'NI rY t;OMMEftC IAL N NfltillRtUUll>O0 (:ClMMF.RUAL 11 I RAHi. SFR'f'lt F.~ O,lM~IF.RC.:tAL (J rRc.JI f'-Clf)NAI. RF.I.Al El> CAI> ('fNIKAl.811SINF,Sl)l,;;AJCT Pl PI.ANNfl) INIJltSIRIAl (i Cil)\.'fRNllilf.Nff1\l:IUTIIE5 11 Pl'fll.lC UIIUIIH Jtr. RF< RF\IICtNCOMMEIICIAL SCHOOLS F. EU':MF.NTA.RV ZONE 2 ZONE 21 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 13 GENERAL PLAN RLM ZONE! 7 I I I I I . I I / / .ca,a1,;--Grow111 MaNgernenl Proe,NI JANUARY 1887 ZONE 1 IISIDINTIAL PC PUNNr1,c·(1MMl'NIT'Y7(lNF. R·.\ Rf~IDFNll,\I ,\(;RIClllJllRAJ.1.0NE A-£ lll'RAL RESlhFN JL.\I f.~ O,lE ZONE R· 1 ONF. FAMH.l Af:~IDF~ f!AL ZONE R-l nn rAMILY 11:f'lillJENflAI.Zt>NE A-, Ptfl'f:llPI.F. FAMIIYRE$ll)fNIIAl.7.CJNIE I I I 1t 'L LIMI IF.I) Ml'I n-F.\MJI.,· Rf~ll)FNllAl ZC)NE Rll-M Rr~ll1F.N-IIAI. IH-:Nir;I I"! Ml11.lll'I I: 7.f>NE Rll II RFSIIJl:N 11.\1. l>fN<;;l (Y.IIH,II Zl •NF. RliotllP RP~IIJF.NIIAI.J\llllHIF. IHIME rARKZONE lt.P RF.Slllf.N ll.-\1. PRt: ,.p:o;,l(JNAL l.UNE RT ftfSIIJF.NllA.1.Tl,t RtSrZ<lNI! llW RF .... tllfN 114,I_ \1:UERWAY ZONE CO-IIICIAL 0 otnt:F.ZUNF. Cl Nf.lGURt.lRlkJOl>CO\fMF.tl<:lALZONE C l GF.NF.RAL COMMER< 1AI. lONF. C-T U>MI\IERUAlTOl RJH 7.0NE C·M llf.AVY t:UMMERCLAL-UMITED INDUfi1UAL ZONE M INUIJS ["RIAL ZONE P·M PI.ANNF.D INOtrSTRIAl ZONE OTHII F·P FlfX)UPf.AIN OVF.IU.AY ZONE L·C lJMll'tD COflflllOL OS OPl:N SPACE ZONE 2 ZONE 211 R-A-10 R-1-9 R-1-a LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 14 I I I I I I I ZONING Cffy ol C•llbacl Growth Managam1nt Pr~•"' JANUARY 1887 15 BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS II. BUILDOUT ASSUMPTIONS AND PR03ECTIONS To properly assess and plan for public facilities and services in Zone 2, it ls necessary to project the level of development that can be anticipated at the ultimate buildout of this Zone. Buildout projections are used to determine existing residential and non-residential land uses and to assess the ultimate potential that may be reached at the time Zone 2 is completely developed. The ultimate buildou~ of Zone 2 has been determined by examining: 1. The amount of existing land use, 2. The amount of approved, yet undeveloped land uses, and 3. The vacant land which can still be developed. The methodology used to compile the buildout projections is consistent with that used in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. Assumptions and methodologies are described below: 1 • 2. Existing Land Uses Surveys and analysis were conducted to determine the acreage of each land use category within Zone 2. Field checks and subsequent research ascertained how each parcel was actually being utilized as well as the square footage of existing commercial/office structures. Exhibit A, "Existing Land Use Cateqories", on Page 18 details this information. Because Zone 2 is an infill area and much of the land has been developed, only gross acreages are shown on Exhibit A. For informational purposes, the 100% constrained areas and 25-40% slopes are included in the appendix. Approved But Undeveloped Land Exhibit B, "Approved Development Projects By Land Use Category", on Page 19 includes land uses which have approved projects but which have not been developed as of January 1, 1987. Bulldout ls constrained by approved projects because the land has been committed to a particular use or density, even though it is presently vacant. Approved projects are those which have received discretionary approval by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. In this case, two residential projects, Tamarack Point and Falcon Hills, have final maps recorded, have received building permits for all or portions of the· .projects, and portions are under construction. Exhibit C, "Approved Projects", on Page 20, shows the status of these projects. 16 3. Vacant Land All vacant land was inventoried by land use type to determine ultimate buildout of the zone. The Citywide Plan directed all environmentally constrained land to be subtracted from the gross acreage figure for vacant land. Exhibit D, "Vacant Land Use Categories", on Page 21, shows potential future development based on the remaining parcels of vacant land in Zone 2. Mapping of the environmental constraints is on file in the Planning Department. A set of assumptions regarding site coverage for commercial/office development was applied to the net developable acreage figures. Basically, every net developable acre of commercial/ office would result in a maximum square footage yield of 40%. Currently, there are 1,993 existing residential units, and 451 approved/committed units. However, when applying the growth control yield densities to the residentially designated land within Zone 2, this results in a theoretical yield of 2,161 units. The number of existing and committed residential units (2,444) exceeds the growth control yield and the future buildout of this zone will add an additional 134 units. At buildout, Zone 2 will exceed the growth control yield by 417 units. However, it is important to note that most of Zone 2 was developed before the growth control points were established, so some discrepancies are expected. Actually, at buildout, the RLM designated acreage meets the control point of 3.2 du/ac. The difference is in the RM acreage, which shows an overall density of 10.1 du/ac, instead of the required control point of 6 du/ac. The units which exceed the growth control point will be offset in other zones in the northeast quadrant. These zones include 7, 14, 15, and 25. Two other zones in the quadrant, 5 and 16 have no residential land. Growth in the northeast quadrant will be consistent with the Carlsbad Municipal code as amended pursuant to the approval of Proposition Eon November 4, 1986. Therefore, growth will be in conformance with the residential quadrant cap. 17 EXHIBIT A ZONE 2 EXISTING LAND USE CATEGORIES Listed below are the type and acreage of each land use category within Zone 2. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION RESIDENTIAL: RL Low Density (0-1.5) RLM Low-Med Density (0-4) RM Medium Density (4-8) RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15) RH High Density (15-23) COMMERCIAL: CBD Central Business District C Community N Neighborhood RC Recreation TS Travel Services 0 Professional & Related RRE Extensive Regional Retail RRI Intensive Regional Retail RS Regional Service INDUSTRIAL: . PI Planned Industrial OTHER: E J H HC p G u NRR OS Elementary School Junior High School High School Continuation School Private School Government Facility Public Utilities Non-Residential Reserve Open Space Park Easements MAJ Major Arterial MIN Minor Arterial COL Collector Street TOTAL ACREAGE 18 ACRES 525.9 135.3 ACRES . 24.3 10.2 13.4 58.3 22.3 19.9 809.6 22.2 36.1 1/87 EXHIBIT B ZONE 2 APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS BY LAND USE CATEGORIES Listed below are the type and acreage of each land use category with approved, but unbuilt, projects within Zone 2. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION RESIDENTIAL: RL Low Density (0-1.5) RLM Low-Med Density (0-4) RM Medium Density (4-8) RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15) RH High Density (15-23) COMMERCIAL: CBD Central Business District C Community N Neighborhood · RC Recreation TS Travel Services 0 Professional & Related RRE Extensive Regional Retail HRI Intensive Regional Retail RS Regional Service INDUSTRIAL: PI Planned Industrial OTHER: E J H HC p G u NRR OS Elementary School Junior High School High School Continuation School Private School Government Facility Public Utilities Non-Residential Reserve Open Space DWELLING UNITS 451 ACRES * See Exhibit C "Approved Projects" on Page 20 for a further breakdown of specific projects. 19 EXHIBIT C ZONE 2 APPROVED PROJECTS Building Total Permits City File Project Dwelling Not Yet Units Under Number CT 84-35 CT 84-14 Name Units Pulled Construction Falcon Hills Phase I 97 17 43 Phase II & III 151 151 Tamarack Point 377 0 240 Total 625 168 283 As of January 1, 1987, the total number of approved u,its was 451, including those units under construction and those without building permits. The 174 units that were built by January 1, 1987 were included in ·the existing dwelling unit count. 20 Units Built 37 137 174 EXHIBIT D ZONE 2 VACANT LAND USE CATECORIES As of January 1, 1987, the following types and amounts of land use are vacant and not in the development process. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION RESIDENTIAL: RL low Density (0-1.5) RLM low-Med Density (0-4) RM Medium Density (4-8) RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15) RH High Density (15-23} COMMERCIAL: CBD Central Business District C Community N Neighborhood RC Recreation TS Travel Services 0 Professional & Related RRE Extensive Regional Retail RR! Intensive Regional Retail RS Regional Service INDUSTRIAL: PI Planned Industrial OTHER: E J H HC p G u NRR OS Elementary School Junior High School High School Continuation School Private School Government Facility Public Utilities Non-Residential Reserve Open Space * Assumes 4~ square footage yield. GROSS VACANT ACRES 13. 76 31.07 9.0 99.3** NET VACANT ACRES 9.26 18.0 3.6 99.3 ** Includes other open space easements throughout the zone, in addition to General Plan designated open space. 21 POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 26 DU's 108 DU's 156,815 Sf* BUILDOUT PROJECTION Residential The Management generation existing, breakdown, residential buildout population projection for Zone 2 was determined by applying a population rate of 2.471 persons per dwelling unit to the approved and potential future units. The population therefore, is as follows: Units Existing 1,993 X Approved 451 X Future 134 l( Total 2,578 X Rate 2.471 II II II = = = = Population 4,925 1,114 331 6,370 The buildout population projections are used consistently throughout this plan for the purpose of predicting demand for public facilities and improvements. Non-Residential The non-residential bulldout projection for Management Zone 2 was determined by totaling the existing, approved and potential future square footage by use category. Building permit files were researched to determine the existing and approved square footage. Vacant land square footage was calculated by multiplying the gross vacant acres (shown on Exhibit D, "Vacant Land Use Categories", on Page 21) by 40%. The non-residential buildout breakdown, therefore ls as follows: Existing Approved Future Non-Residential Buildout Projection 22 Square Footage 266,449 0 156,815 423,264 23 PHASING III. PHASING -AN OVERVIEW It is necessary to provide a phasing schedule of development for the entire City, each quadrant, and each of the 25 Local facilities Management Zones for the purpose of: 1. Projecting future demands for public facilities on a yearly basis; and 2. Establishing the thresholds which identify when a public facility is needed; and 3. Assisting with the development of the City's Capital Improvement Program budget. In the Citywide Plan, phasing of residential development was 1,250 dwelling units per year. These projections were based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management Systems, Monitoring Report of April, 1986. In each Local Plan a key element will be the projected phasing schedule of development within that specific zone. These schedules are presented for the purpose of establishing thresholds for demand and future demands for public facilities. By projecting these future public facility and improvement demands the appropriate funds may be allocated into the Capital Improvement Budget to assure that the needed facilities are in place as development occurs. The phasinq schedule is not presented to establish a rate of growth within the City. It will be used to assure that growth occurs only as public facilities are available to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards. The specific phasing schedule presented in this plan is provided to accomplish the three purposes of phasing which were discussed above. These projections have been established by reviewing development in the pipeline which have tentative and final maps. The projections also consider pending applications. The same type of phasing has been prepared for SANDAG's Series VII for the entire City and will be utilized to review phasing projections presented in this and other local plans to determine the overall impact on public facilities and services. Zone 2 -Phasing Schedule Phasing for Zone 2 incorporates the Citywide projections as well as localized factors unique to the Zone. These localized circumstances include: 1. The amount and type of developing projects: -Final Maps -Tentative Maps -Applications Pending 24 2. The ultimate type and amount of land use potential. 3. The amount of development that can be reasonably absorbed into the market in a given time frame. The specific residential phasing schedule for Zone 2 is shown below. The schedule assumes the zone will be completely built out by the end of 1995. The schedule phases those projects identified in the developing process beginning in 1987 through 1995. During this time period it ls estimated that a total of 585 additional residential units will be built in Zone 2. Year 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 RESIDENTIAL PHASING Zone 2 Yearly Dwelling Increase 225 226 0 0 36 36 36 21 5 Total Dwelling Units 1,993 2,218 2,444 2,444 2,444 2,480 2,516 2,552 2,573 2,578 In Zone 2 the non-residential land uses will be phased based upon previous growth trends, location of parcels, and current applications being considered by the Planning Department. The phasing schedule assumes that the vacant or under developed parcels within the zone that have no applications pending will be developed beginning in 1987 and phased through the buildout of the zone. In all, a total of 2,578 residential dwelling units will exist at the buildout of Zone 2. This residential total, although above the growth control point, is in compliance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code as modified by the passage of Proposition E on November 4, 1986 because future development potential ls minimal and it will be balanced out in zones 7, 14, 15 and 25 in the northeast quadrant. 25 The by 1990. The total D, "Vacant YEAR 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 non-residential land uses will be completely built out This assumes a phasing schedule which begins in 1987. vacant non-residential land uses are shown on Exhibit Land Use Categories" on Page 21. NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING Zone 2 OFFICE SQ. FT. 40,249 116,566 Total Square Footage Phasing Summary It ls estimated that the remaining residential units in Zone 2 will develop by 1995. Yearly residential growth is expected to range from a high of 226 units in 1988 to a low of five units in 1995. Non-residential development of Zone 2 was estimated to build out by 1990. The specific phasing of Zone 2, is presented for the purpose of determining future annual demand and thresholds for public facilities. It is impossible to predict the exact way development will occur in this Zone, but through these phasing projections the City will be able to establish a direct link between development and the need for public facilities. This link will allow the City to ensure compliance with the adopted performance standards at all times as growth occurs. And if compliance is not maintained, development will be stopped until it conforms with the adopted performance standards. 26 27 ZONE REQUIREMENTS IV. ZONE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES The Management Plan for Zone 2 addresses eleven separate facilities: 1. City Administrative Facilities 2. Library 3. Wastewater Treatment Capacity 4. Parks 5. Or ainage 6. Circulation 7. Fire 8. Open Space 9. Schools 10. Sewer Collection System 11. Water Distribution System Each of these facilities will be evaluated to determine conformance with the adopted performance standard. The evaluation will be made in three stages based on existing demand, approved or committed demand, and future demand at buildout. For each of these facilities and ·services the following is provided: 1. An illustrative map showing what is existing and what will be needed as the zone develops to its ultimate buildout; 2. District boundary maps where facilities are provided by special districts (le., school, water, sewer); 3. Adopted service level performance standards which must be complied with at all times as growth occurs; and 4. A detailed facility planning and adequacy analysis for each of the public facilities and services. The Citywide facilities, which include City Administrative Facilities, Library, and Wastewater Treatment, have been analyzed in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. These will also be included in the Local Facilities Management Plan to show compliance or to suggest alternatives to assure conformance with the adopted standard. In any case, t~is analysis will show how each of the adopted performance standards will be compiled with as development occurs within the City, quadrant, and zone. This plan includes financing of all public facilities and services where non-conformance with the standard requires mitigation. It also includes a complete phasing schedule for all development within the zone. 28 29 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES ZONE 2 LOCAL CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES • CITY AOMINIITRATION-EXIITINCI Q QTY AOMINISTRATION-.. LANNEO I \ ',, __ __ ~ l c,.""",, ' 2 --r----... "7t I I I I t to , ... -(o_""T' __ •o CO s r A. 0 l I YE NH A IN FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 30 CltyotC...._, Growlll .......,.._.. Pl'CH7am ~ JANUARY 1987 LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION SUPPLY ADEQUACY (Ccn.a11a .. wlat■ldllrd) MITIGATION FUNDING 86,539 EXISTING 106,084 YES N/A N/A (SQUARE FEET) 7,387 118,867* APPROVED 168,084 YES N/A N/A (SQUARE FEET C, 1,672 z -Cf) < ::c 202,371 0. FUTURE 168,084** YES*** N/A N/A (SQUARE FEET 9,555 * As of January 1, 1987, 32,328 square feet of demand has ·been approved. ** In the year 2005 this facility will no longer conform to the adopted performance standard. *** Zone 2 is scheduled to phase out all of its residential land by 1995. 31 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Fifteen hundred square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five-year period. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The purpose of this not the performance standard Zone 2 complies with the Administrative Facilities. analysis is to determine whether or is being met, and if the demand for overall Citywide analysis of City A. Inventory 1. Facility Demands: Existing (as of 1/1/87) Buildout Population (Citywide/Zone) 57,495/4,925 134,914/6,370 2. Existing City Administrative Facilities: SQUARE FEET City Hall Facilities City Hall Finance Dept. Modular Purchasing/Risk Management Modular Leased Space Redevelopment Community Development Dept. Las Palmas Facility Square Footage Permanent Space 12,899 Public Safety and Service Center Phase I Police and Fire Depts. Vehicle Maintenance Totals 53,700 10,358 76,957 Total Existing Facilities 106,084 * Year-to-Year Option 32 Temporary Space 2,700 1,800 4,500 Required Square Footage {Citywide/Zone) 86,539/7,387 202,371/9,555 Leased Space 2,000 22,627 24,627 Lease Expiration Date 3/31/83* 7 /31/90 As indicated on the table on the previous page, approximately 23% of existing administrative facilities are leased and 4.2% are temporary (portable modular units). If the rental leases are terminated or the modulars are no longer used, the existing square footage of City Administrative Facilities will be reduced. At that time, the Management Plan for Zone 2, as well as the Citywide Plan, will need to be amended to modify the phasing assumptions in order to plan for more City Administrative Facilities at an earlier time. 3. Facilities in City's Five Year Capital Improvements Program: Item 3.~ Year Amount Source a. Public Safety Center Phase II* Design Construction 62,000 86-87 89-90 $ 255,000 $3,455,000 PFF** PFF/S/W** b. Total Facilities in City's 5 Year Capital Improvements Program. 62,000 square feet * Public Safety Center Phase II. Yard offices, Maintenance shops, and Purchasing warehouse for the use of Utility Maintenance, P~rks & Recreation Maintenance, Street Maintenance and Purchasing. Approximate size is 62,000 square feet. This includes a two-story Yard office and Purchasing warehouse with a 6,400 square foot mezzanine. ** PFF -Public Facilities Fee S -Sewer W -Water Enterprise 33 From the population projections, a demand for City Administrative Facilities has been assessed. The specific phasing for Zone 2 is being projected based on the number of projects which are currently pending review, have received tentative approvals, or have received final approvals. The exact timing of these specific projects may vary, however, the timing of necessary public facility improvements would also vary accordingly. This will assure that the adopted performance standards will be met as development occurs. Exhibit E is provided as a projection of growth throughout the City of Carlsbad on a yearly basis. YEAR EXHIBIT E P L A N H I N G P R O J B C T I O N S O N L Y -----------------------------------------------DWELLING UNIT AND POPULATION PROJECTION~ ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEJ.R AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT EXISTING REMAINING PROJECTED BEGINNING ENDING D. 0 • IS D. U • I 5 GROWTH YEAR YEAR POP. POP. ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1987 23,348 31,251 1,250 57,693 60,782 1988 24,598 30,001 1,250 60,782 63,870 1989 25,848 28,751 1,250 63,870 .66,959 1990 27,098 27,501 1,250 66,959 70,048 1991 28,348 26,251 1,250 70,048 73,137 1992 29,598 25,001 1,250 73,137 76,22!> 1993 30,848 23,751 1,250 76,225 79,314 1994 32,098 22,501 1,250 79,314 82,403 1995 33,348 21,251 1,250 82,403 85,492 1996 34,598 20,001 1,250 85,492 88,580 1997 35,848 18,751 1,250 88,580 91,669 1998 37,098 17,501 1,250 91,669 94,758 1999 38,348 16,251 1,250 94,758 97,847 2000 39,598 15,001 1,250 97,847 100,935 2001 40,848 13,75·1 1,250 100,935 104,024 2002 42,098 12,501 1,250 104,024 107,113 2003 43,348 11,251 1,250 107,113 110,202 2004 44,598 10,001 1,250 110,202 113,290 2005 45,848 8,751 1,250 113,290 116,379 2006 47,098 7,501 1,250 116,379 119,468 2007 48,348 6,251 1,250 119,468 122,557 2008 49,598 5,001 1,250 122,557 125,645 2009 50,848 3,751 1,250 125,645 128,734 2010 52,098 2,501 1,250 128,734 131,823 2011 53,348 1,251 1,250 131,823 134,912 2012 54,598 1 1 134,912 134,914 2013 54,599 0 34 B. Phasing Population projections for the entire City were made within the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan which have been updated and are shown on the previous page. The following exhibit shows the yearly demand for City Administrative Facilities as well as the yearly demand created by Zone 2 based on the projected Citywide phasing. EXHIBIT F P L A N N I N G P R O J E C T I O N S O N L Y CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT (1,500 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATION) YEAR ZONE 2 POP. ZONE 2 DEMAND BEGINNING 01/01/YR CITYWIDE DEMAND BEGINNING 01/01/YR EXISTING CONFORMS/ FACILITIES (NON- CONFORMING) 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 4,925 5,481 6,039 6,039 6,039 6,128 6,217 6,306 6,358 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 7,387 8,221 9,059 9,059 9,059 9,192 9,326 9,459 9,537 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 9,555 86,539 91,172 95,806 100,439 105,072 109,705 114,338 118,971 123,604 128,237 132,871 137,504 142,137 146,770 151,403 156,036 160,669 165,302 169,936 174,569 179,202 183,835 188,468 193,101 197,734 202,367 202,371 106,084 106,084 106,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 168,084 19,545 14,912 10,278 67,645 63,012 58,379 53,746 49,113 44,480 39,847 35,213 30,580 25,947 21,314 16,681 12,048 7,415 2,782 (1,852) (6,485} (11,118} (15,751} (20,384) (25,017) (29,650) (34,283) (34,287) These projections were based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management Systems, Monitoring Report of April, 1986. 35 Currently, Zone 2 has 1,993 dwelling units which generate 7,387 square feet of demand for City Administrative Facilities. As of January 1, 1987, the existing Citywide demand for City Administrative Facilities was 86,539 square feet, of which the existing demand for Zone 2 is included. Zone 2 has the potential to create an additional 2,168 square feet of demand. C. Adequacy Findings City Administrative Facilities based upon the projected phasing of Citywide development and that of Zone 2, will conform with the adopted standard until the year 2005. The following Exhibit, "City Administrative Facilities", on Page 37 shows the existing and committed facilities, projected Citywide demand, and Zone 2's phased demand. III. MITIGATION A. Special Conditions for Zone 2 No special conditions are necessary at this time. B. Financing Public Facilities Fees are continuing to be collected Citywide and in Zone 2. Future residential development will create a relatively small demand for City Administrative Facilities (2,168 sq. ft. of additional demand at buildout). Th f e, it is assumed that the minimal proportionate share required of this zone will be adequately financed by Public Facilities Fees paid by future Zone 2 development. In other words, no other financing mechanism will be required as a condition of development relative to adequate City Administrative Facilities. 36 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES ZONE 2 COMPARISON 210 200 190 180 168,084 168,084 168.084 170 160 SUPPLY 0 150 z 140 < ~ 130 LIJ o.-• 120 la. "'O oc 0 110 w ti~ '-I 100 ~o LIJt 90 ~ 80 :::, 70 a u, 60 50 40 30 20 9,059 9,537 9,555 9,555 9,555 10 0 m )( 1990 1995 2000 2005 2013 :c -m -DEMAND BY YEAR -I G) 38 LIBRARY ZONE 2 LOCAL ZONE 2 V -------..---LN I \ ',,_ ---Al C◄..,.', ' LIBRARY .. -r--------.... :1 I I I I I IO , , -(o, --ir-~- ■ Ll■IIAAll!S-EXISTING D u■IIAIIIH-411.ANNll!D FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 39 PLAN City of C••ltted 0,owrf\ ~ P.-~am -JANUARY 1987 LOCAL. FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2 LIBRARY SUMMARY SHEET BUILDOUT DEMAND ADEQUACY PROJECTION SUPPLY (Cc.NIWI» MITIGATION FUNDING w18t■mrd) 46,154 EXISTING 31,500 NO* SEE PAGE 44 SEE (SQUARE FEET) PAGE 45 3,940 63,396 31, s·oo NO* ------APPROVED (SQUARE FEET) C, 892 z -(I) c( J: 0.. 197,931 FUTURE ------------ (SQUARE FEET 5,096 * Until this facility conforms with the adopted performan~e standard, no residential development may occur in the City. With existing plus committed demand, this facility is short 31,896 square feet. 40 LIBRARY I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD 800 square feet per 1,000 population of Library must be scheduled for construction within a five year period. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or not the performance standard is being met and, if the demand for Zone 2 is consistent with the overall Citywide analysis of the Library. A. Inventory 1. Facility Demand: Existing (as of 1/187) Buildout 2. Existing Facilities: Civic Center library Adult Learning Center La Costa Area Library Warehouse Total Population (Citywide/Zone) 57,495/4,925 134,914/6,370 Owned Sq. Ft. 24,600 24,600 Total owned and leased space Required Square Footage (Citywide/Zone) 46·, 154/3,940 107,931/5,096 Leased Sq. Ft. 400 4,500 2,000 6,900 31,500 Sq.Ft. 3. Facilities in the five year Capital Improvement Program: The adopted Five Year C.I.P. includes $650,000 for the design of a main library in the southern area of the City. Also, in Appendix A of the C.I.P. "To be Considered Capital Projects", the construction of this library is estimated at $6,900,000 to be funded by the Public Facilities Fee. 4. Other Information: The City Council report entitled, on August 26, 1986 approved the final "A Strategic Plan & Space Needs Study of 41 B. the City of Carlsbad City Hall & libraries" which was prepared by Michael Feerer & Associates. The Council ,adopted option #5 of the library portion of the study which directed staff to initiate a site selection study to be returned for Council consideration by January 1, 1987. Several sites have been determined to be suitable for a southern library location. Staff is attempting to negotiate an agreement for a site at this time. Phasing Population projections for the entire City were prepared on a yearly basis and are shown in Exhibit E, "Dwelling Unit and Population Projections" on Page 34. These projections are based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized for the City's Capital Improvements Program and the Public Facilities Management System, Monitoring Report of April, 1986. The specific phasing for Zone 2 is being projected based on the number of projects whi hare ~urrently pending review, have received tentative approvals, or have received final approvals. 42 EXHIBIT ·H PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY LIBRARY FACILITIES ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT (800 SQUARE FEET PER 1,000 POPULATION) YEAR 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ZONE 2 POP. 4,925 5,481 6,039 6,039 6,039 6,128 6,217 6,306 6,358 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 6,370 ZONE 2 DEMAND BEGINNING 0l/01/YR 3,940 4,385 4,831 4,839 4,851 4,856 4,861 4,866 4,868 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 4,871 CITYWIDE DEMAND BEGINNING 01/01/YR 46,154 48,625 51,096 53,567 56,038 58,509 60,980 "63,451 65,922 68,393 70,864 73,335 75,806 78,277 80,748 83,2i9 85,690 88,161 90,632 93,103 95,574 98,045 100,516 102,987 105,458 107,929 107,931 EXISTING CONFORMS/ FACILITIES (NON- CONFORMING) 31,500 (14,654) CURRENTLY NON-CONFORMING Exhibit H shows that as Library Facilities in Zone 2 currently has 31,500 square feet shortage of 14,654 square feet. by approved projects the library square feet. of January 1, 1987 the demand for is 3,940 square feet. The City of library space with an existing With additional demand generated shortage will increase to 31,896 43 C. Adequacy Findings Library space is currently below standard and there are no adopted or guaranteed plans to bring this into conformance with the adopted performance standard. Until it does comply no development may occur in Zone 2 or the City. Exhibit I, "Zone 2 Demand Comparison", on Page 46 shows the existing and committed facilities, projected Citywide demand and Zone 2's phased demand. The Library Director has determined that the proportional impacts of commercial and industrial development on library facilities is mitigated entirely through the collection of PFF funds. Only the development of residential projects should be stopped if the standard is not being complied with. Staff is alternative No. 1 year CIP be amended in excess of the another, is chosen Zone 2 or the City. III. MITIGATION recommending that the City Council follow under "Mitigation" section and that the five to include funding for new library facilities current shortage. Until this alternative, or no residential development may be allowed in There are a number of alternatives which could be considered to bring the City's library space into conformance with the adopted standard. 1. Amend the current five year CIP to include funding for new library facilities, which could require deleting other projects. Until this is done, development cannot occur in Zone 2; 2. Put a measure on the ballot that would raise the necessary money to fund the building of a new library facility through the use of General Obligation Bonds. This would require a 2/3 approval for the bonds and would mean that no development could occur in the interim; or 3. Direct staff to attempt to bring the City's library space into conformance with the a opted standard based on the Local Facilities Management Plans which will be received for zones other than 1 through 6. It is recommended that the City approve Alternative No. 1 and amend the CIP to include funding for new library facilities. It should be noted that the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan utilized leased library space in assessing compliance with the adopted performance standard. This space should be considered temporary and may not always be available for use by the Library. If a lease were not renewed, it could cause a shortage in library space. Additional mitigation would be necessary. 44 A. Special Conditions for Zone 2 No residential building or development permits shall be issued in Zone 2 until the City Council takes action approving measures which provide for library services to meet the adopted performance standards. 8. Financing The City currently collects a Public Facility Fee (PFF) which is set at 2.5$ of permit valuation. This fee is paid at the time of building permit issuance. The adopted Capital Improvement Budget includes $650,000 of PFF funds to design a new library facility. Other possible funding sources could be: Issuance of General Obligation Bonds, Certificates of Participation, General Capital Construction funds, Revenue Sharing, State or Federal grants. At the present time there are no funds appropriated for the construction of additional library space. 45 LIBRARY ZONE 2 COMPARISON 130 120 110 107,931 100 a 90 z <( ~ 80 w C"" • 70 IL "O QC .s,-. 0 60 °' ti ~ WO IL .C 50 wt ~ 40 ::> 31,500 31,500 31,500 31,500 31,500 0 (/) 30 SUPPLY 20 10 4,839 4,868 4,871 4,871 4,871 0 ZONE 2 m -10 X :c 1990 1995 2000 2005 2013 -· ttJ - DEMAND BY YEAR -I WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY 47 ENCINA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ZONE 2 ZONE 2 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 48 WASTEWATER , •o I t OtyofCart .... Cifowrfl w..oem .. PIL-ogrant -JANUARY 198 BUILDOUT L O C A L . F A C I L I T I E S M A N ·A G E M E N T P L A N -Z o n e 2 WASTEWATER TREAT~ENT CAPACITY Carlsbad Service Area SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ca-lormalce w/Staidard) MIT/GA T/ON FUNDING 4.7 EXISTING 5.7 NO SEE PAGE 53 SEE MGD PAGE a 6.6d APPROVED 8.6b,d YES N/A NIA MGO (!J ---z -en < ::c 7 .• 7c a. F~GbU.RE 8.6c,d YES N/A N/A --- a. Buildout assumptions are for the entire sewer service ar~a which includes Zone 2. The following analysis of a citywide facility, therefore, focuses. on the entire sewer service area, and not just on Zone 2. b. Assumes Phase IV expansion of Encina. c. Demand and Supply, as of 1995. d. Demand and Supply, as of 1991. 49 53 WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Sewer plant capacity is adequate for at least a five year period. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory Sewer service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three separate and independent agencies, Leuradia County Water District, San Marcos County Water District, and the City of Carlsbad. Sewer service for Zone 2 is provided entirely by the City of Carlsbad. 1. Buildout Assumptions (Carlsbad Sewer Service Area): Wastewater Treatment Demands Carlsbad Population Current Bulldout 40,356 95,669 * EDU -Equivalent Dwelling Units EDU* Currentlruildout 21,354 47,800 MGD** Current Bulldout 4.7 11.8 ** MGD -Million Gallons per Day -Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) 2. Existing Facilities The City of Carlsbad has capacity available at two treatment plant facilities. Secondary treatment capacity ls provided through the Encina Water Pollution Cont~ol Facility (WPCF) which is a regional facility owned by six member agencies. The current rated capacity of the plant is 22.5 MGD of which Carlsbad retains ownership of 25.4 percent (5.7 MGD). The City of Carlsbad also holds title to the Calavera Hills Treatment Plant which has a capacity of 1.2 MGD. The Calavera Facility is not operational at this time and will require the expenditure of $1.1 to $1.5 million to make it functional. Operation of the Calavera Hills Plant is estimated to cost $360,000 per year. Comparable treatment at the Encina WPCF is estimated at $135,000 per year. The Calavera Hills Plant ls not economical to operate for treatment capacity except in the absence of needed capacity at Enclna. 50 3. Facilities in the City's Five Year Capital Improvements Program: The adopted CIP includes two items which will be financed from the sewer fund which affect wastewater treatment capacity: B. a. Encina WPCF -Phase IV expansion, scheduled to begin in 1989, and completed in 1991 -$6,500,000 Carlsbad's share of this facility is 2.9 MGD. b. Calavera Hills $2,000,000 for 1986-87 and the 1990-91 Fiscal Years. Construction to be phased to correspond to capacity needs. Phasing and Service Demand Based on data maintained by the City Development Processing Services Department,· on March 31, 1987, 22,965 EDU's had been permitted by the City. Utilizing 246 GPO per EDU and the adopted 3% vacancy factor, 985 EDU's of capacity remain to be issued prior to reaching Carlsbad's share of capacity at the Encina WPCF. The Citywide Facilities Management Plan is based on phased growth of 1,250 dwelling units per year plus non- residential development. Using a similar phasing for the portion of the City within the Carlsbad Sewer Service Area an annual growth rate of 1,143 EDU's per year (905 residential EDU's and 238 non-residential EDU's) is projected. This phasing would indicate that Carlsbad's wastewater treatment allocation could be exceeded within a year. Staff has just completed an analysis of Carlsbad's wastewater flows to Encina WPCF to determine the actual flow value of an EDU. As of March 30, 1987, 21,354 equivalent dwelling units {EDU's) were connected and being billed by the City for sewer service. Flow corresponding to these EDU's has been measured at 4.69 MGD. That flow divided by the currently billed EDU's yields an actual flow rate of 220 gallons per day (GPO) per EDU. However, for planning purposes the City of Carlsbad has adopted a flow rate ·of 246 GPO per EDU. Evaluation of available capacity varies significantly depending on the value of flow per EDU utilized. As can be seen from Table 1 on Page 52, utilizing 220 GPO per EDU, treatment capacity at Encina WPCF would be available until 1990 with plant expansion expected to be completed in 1991. c. Adequacy Findings Based on analysis of existing flow data and a range of projections it is likely that current treatment capacity will be reached between 1988 and 1990, and that additional interim capacity will be required to meet the performance standard. Options exist to provide interim treatment capacity which would allow the Zone as well as the City's Sewer Service Area to meet 51 ill! 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 U1 N 1994 1995 T A B L E 1 CARLSBAD SERVICE AREA DEMAND AND AVAILABLE MASTEYATER TREATMENT CAPACITY FLOW PROJECTIONS1 EQUIVALENT DWELLING FLOW al 220 FLOW al 246 UNITS (EDU'S) GAL/EDU (MGD)2 GAL/EDU (MGD) ENCINA {MGD) 21,354 4.69 5.25 5. 71 23,3843 5.14 5. 75 5. 71 24,492 5.40 6.03 5. 71 25,600 5.63 6.29 5.71 26,708 5.87 6.57 8.57 27,816 6.12 6.84 8.57 28,924 6.36 7 .12 8.57 30,032 6.60 7.38 8.57 31, 140 6.85 7.66 8.57 TREATMENT CAPACITY LAKE CALAVERA HILLS CMGD) TOTAL (MGO) 0.0 5. 71 0.6 6.31 0.7 6.41 0.7 6.41 0.0 8.57 0.0 8.57 0.0 8.57 0.0 8.57 o.o 8.57 1 NOTE: 1989 to 1995 EDU 1s are expanded 1,143 per year. This represents 905 dwelling units and 238 EDU•s of commercial and industrial. (428,400 sq. ft. at 1,800 sq. ft. per EDU.) Each year is projected to July 1 to correspond to fiscal year budgeting and adjusted for a 3X vacancy. 2 MGD = Millions of Gallons Per Day 3 1988 EDU'S = 22,965 EDU'S issued 3·31·87 + 1,143 per Note 1 adjusted for 3X vacancy (22,965 + 1,143) X 0.97 = 23,384 performance standard. the proposed special Mitigation section. These alternatives are incorporated into conditions outlined in the following III. A. B. MITIGATION Special Conditions for Zone 2 1. The following actions shall be pursued by the City to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity throughout a five (5) year period: a. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. b. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide adequate capacity. c. When Carlsbad's share of Encina flows reach 5.25 MGD, actively seek leased capacity from other Encina agencies. d. When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 MGD, proceed to activation of the Calavera Hills Reclamation/Treatment Facility. Plant to be activated when more cost effective treatment measures are no longer feasible and Carlsbad capacity at Encina has been reached. Financing Sewer connection fees provide the primary source of funding for both sewer line upgrades and expansion of treatment plant capacity. The timing of sewer facilities upgrades and the mechanism of financing are critical to analysis of the adequacy of funding for plant expansion. A complete financial and cash flow analysis should be conducted in conjunction with the Citywide Sewer Master Plan update. This analysis will provide a basis to evaluate development phasing within sewer basins and each Growth Management Zone. Priority for funding should be given to wastewater treatment capacity. 53 54 PARKS ZONE 2 ZONE 2 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 55 PARK DISTRICTS ID 4 t 01,o1e-Gto••"~""°"am -JANUARY 1887 HOSP GROVE ZONE 2 LAG RIVIERA c "'"'!!,9.p,l-,,,.,., -.......... ______ _ ,,,,. _1.,!:? .- PARKS --r--- -----.. -:'-I ZONE 2 COMMUNITY PARKS 0 EXISTING • FUTURE ,r SPECIAL USE AREA I \ ', .... ---4't c,.""",, ' \'-(o --.--- LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 56 I I I I to I \ ', . ' ......... ' ' ' \ I I C•ly ot C•ltDecl G,owtP'I Ma'\aget,lant Pr09.1m -JANUARY 198 LOCAL ·FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2 BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION 25.35 EA~~~JING 14.77 36 .1 APPROVED ACRES C, 18. 11 z -ti') c( l: 62.53 0. FUTURE ACRES 19.11 PARKS Park District 2 SUMMARY SHEET SUPPLY ADEQUACY (Ca ... 11•a w,._.,d) 30.3 YES 42.3* YES 42.3** NO MITIGATION N/A N/A N/A FUNDING N/A N/A N/A * Includes Phase II of Calavera Hills (10 ac) and a joint-use agreement with the Carlsbad Unified School District for two acres at Hope Elementary School. ** Based on the projected phasing for Park District 2, the standard will be met until 1996. Zone 2 is projected to be built out by 1995 or before any potential park shortages occur. 57 PARKS I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per 1,000 population within a park district, must be scheduled for construction within a five-year period. Special Considerations The Citywide Plan divides the City into four districts which are the same as the City's four quadrants. 2 is located entirely within Park District 2 (NE Quadrant). PARK DISTRICT 2 II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS park Zone The purpose of not the park demand performance standard. this analysis is to determine whether or for Zone 2 complies with the adopted A. Inventory Existing Facilities: Community Parks Calavera Hills larwin Special Use Area larwin B. Phasing Ownership Type Active Passive City City City Passive Total Acreage 1. Buildout Assumptions (1/1/87) Park District 2 Zone 2 Current Buildout Current Buildout Population 8,451 20,843 4,925 6,370 58 Acreaqe 8.0 18.3 26.3 4.0 30.3 Required Acres 25.35 62.53 14.77 19. 11 2. Park Demand (Park District 2) Listed below is the demand for parks generated by projected residential development in Park District 2. Demand was determined by using the following formula: Yearly Dwelling Units x 2.471 = Population Population x Park Standard= Park Demand (by year) Supply is determined by analyzing existing parks and any parks scheduled for construction. This is compared with the demand to determine if the performance standard is being met. EXHIBIT J PARK DISTRICT 2 PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY FOR ZONE 2 PARK ARCEAGE COMPARISON OF DEMAND -V-PARK SUPPLY 3 ACRES OF COMMUNITY PARK OR SPECIAL USE AREA PER 1,000 POPULATION WITHIN THE PARK DISTRICT -------------------------------------------------------------------------YEAR DWELLING TOTAL POP. TOTAL PARKS TOTAL TOTAL CONFORMS/ UNITS DWELLING POP. DEMAND DEMAND SUPPLY (NON- UNITS CONFORMING) -------------------------------------~-----------------------------------EXISTING 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 3,420 3,420 8,451 8,451 25.35 25.35 30.30 * 474 3,894 1,171 9,622 3.51 28.87 30.00 266 4,160 657 10,279 1.97 30.84 42.30 173 4,333 427 10,707 1.28 32.12 42.30 213 4,546 526 11,233 1.58 33.70 42.30 249 4,759 526 11,759 1.58 35.28 42.30 229 5,008 615 12,375 1.85 37.12 42.30 224 5,237 566 12,941 1.70 38.82 42.30 184 5,461 554 13,494 1.66 40.48 42.30 144 5,645 455 13,494 1.36 41.85 42.30 139 5,789 356 13,949 1.07 42.91 42.30 Assumes completion of Phase II of Calavera Hills (10 acres) plus two acres of Hope Elementary School Special Use Area. 59 4.95 1.13 11.46* 10.18 8.60 7.02 5.18 3.48 1.82 0.45 (0.61) 3. Park Demand (Zone 2 Only) Listed below is the demand for parks generated specifically by residential development in Zone 2 and not the entire quadrant. Demand for Zone 2 was reached by using the following formula: Yearly Dwelling Units x 2.471 = Population Population x Park Standard= Park Demand (by year) EXHIBIT K ZONE 2 PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY FOR ZONE 2 PARK ARCEAGE COMPARISON OF DEMAND -V-PARK SUPPLY 3 ACRES OF COMMUNITY PARK OR SPECIAL USE AREA PER 1,000 POPULATION WITHIN THE PARK DISTRICT -------------------------------------------------------------------------YEAR DWELLING TOTAL POP. TOTAL PARKS TOTAL TOTAL CONFORMS/ UNITS DWELLING POP. DEMAND DEMAND SUPPLY (NON- UNITS CONFORMING) -------------------------------------------------------------------------EXISTING 1,993 1,993 4,925 4,925 14.77 14.77 30.30 15.53 1987 225 2,218 556 5,481 1.67 16.44 30.30 13.86 1988 226 2,444 558 6,039 1.68 18.12 42.30 24.18 1989 0 2,444 0 6,039 o.oo 18.12 42.30 24.18 1990 0 2,444 0 6,039 o.oo 18.12 42.30 24.18 1991 36 2,480 89 6,128 0.27 18.38 42.30 23.92 1992 36 2,516 89 6,217 0.27 18.65 42.30 23.65 1993 36 2,552 89 6,306 0.27 18.92 42.30 23.38 1994 21 2,573 52 6,358 0.16 19.07 42.30 23.23 1995 5 2,578 12 6,370 0.04 19.11 42.30 23.19 60 4. Evaluation of Zone 2 Within Park District 2 Listed below are the demand and supply of existing park acreage. Existing Community Parks Special Use Required Acres Total Surplus Acres 26.3 4.0 30.30 25.35 4.95 As shown above, Park District 2 has 4.95 acres more than it needs to meet the performance standard. As Zone 2 develops to buildout, the approved plus future park acreage requirement will be an additional 4.34 acres. The approved 1986-87 CIP has appropriated funds for two park projects in the northeast quadrant. Phase II of the Calavera Hills Park ($2.5 million) includes additional active and passive areas and a community center (10 acres). The other project, which also was appropriated $2.5 million, is for the future acquisition of park land in the northeast quadrant (20 acres minimum). In addition, a feasibility study is underway to determine the future develop-ability of the existing Larwin community park area. Finally, with the opening of Hope Elementary School in September, 1987, the City will have a joint- use agreement with the School District for two acres of Special Use Area. In conclusion, based on phasing, it is anticipated that Zone 2's residential development will bulldout by 1995 and not until 1996, will Park District 2 require more acreage to meet the quadrant demand. At that time, funding must be approved for construction of additional park facilities in Park District 2 within five years. C. Adequacy Findings Park performance 1996. District 2 currently conforms with the adopted standard and is projected to continue to do so until Special Considerations An been the considered Park was issue which has been mentioned in other zone plans has determination of what types of park land should be developed under the Growth Management Program. larwin dedicated to the City before the current standards for 61 City parks were adopted. Therefore, this park site ls designed as passive/natural in the parks inventory and ls considered developed, although most of it is steep slopes. Dedication of Larwin Park was consistent with the Parks and Recreation Element and the General Plan in effect at that time. III. MITIGATION Currently, Park District 2 conforms with the adopted performance standard and needs no mitigation, although it ls projected that a shortage will occur in 1996. Zone 2 ls projected to phase its residential development through 1995. If the phasing schedule varies from this plan, park demand and supply would have to re-evaluated, perhaps sooner than 1996. Another potential issue is the question of whether to consider larwin Park as developed park land. If the determination is made that larwin Park is not usable under the Growth Management Plan1 then the existing supply would not meet the performance standard, and additional mitiqation would be necessary prior to any residential development in Park District 2. A. Special Conditions for Zone 2 Although the performance standard is being met for Zone 2, several conditions are applicable to assure future planning of adequate park facilities in Zone 2: B. 1. Phase II development of Calavera Hills Park must be completed before 4,357 residential units have received building permits within Park District 2. 2. Development shall continue to pay Park-In-Lieu fees and Public Facility Fees for Park District 2 to mitigate the future incremental parks demand within the District. Financing Public Facility Fees and Park-In-Lieu Fees are continuing to be collected and no additional financing plan is needed at this time. Development will be monitored and when it appears that park acreage_ could fall below the standard, the City Council will have to consider options to increase developed park acreage. 62 63 DRAINAGE 7p A VISTA CREIEK --Hl0"1','U•t -I -I --·~ .. ~ ...... • '•,,. , / , .. , .. .. I I I ,/ ; ZONE 29 I I \ I I I I I I I I , .... .... .... .... \ 1\ ZONE I ', \ \ I I I \ I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I • I .. •· 1-····· • I I I I I I \ \ ' \ DIIAINAGI ,,.c,un ·ec· \..,. "-.... ----------------ZONE 2 --.. _ - DRAINAGE EXHIBIT L EXISTING STORM DRAINS & SIZE OPEN CHANNEL ~ CONCRETE LINED CHANNEL c:==:J CONCRETE BOX CULVERT SUB BASIN BOUNDARY ----BASIN BOUNDARY DEBRIS BASIN 01E" SEDIMENT BASIN 01., of Carlabad Gra•tft Menag•ment ProgrMI -JANUARY 1887 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 64 JEFFERSON SEDIMENT BASIN ( ! i I \ \ __ _ \ ' I • • ' I I \ ZONE 1 \\ \ \ • I I I I I I I I I I I : I : : --: _ _,--,- I I \ \ I I \ \ ' I I I I "- '\ DRAINAGE AREAS EXHIBIT M ' '\ .. ZONE 211 ' ... -... '~' I ~,-~ SOUTH COAST SEDIMENT BASIN -\ Z<>NE 7 \ -\ -\ I -· . ------.-----------i-i \ AREA #9 I \ I ' \ I \ \ ' \ \ I I 14 \ ' DRAINAGE FACILITY ', .. , ·ac· : I ZONE 2 , .. , .. \ \ , \,__ ,· -----------------~ I~· , . ·ae· SEDIMENT ■AIIN i~ ' , " LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 65 City el c .. 1,,,. 0,owNI MINQeffllfll ,,0.1111 JANUARY 198 i LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2 BUILDOUT PROJECTION DEMAND EXISTING * ---APPROVED CJ z -"' c( J: 0. FUTURE --- DRAINAGE SUNN.ARY SHEET ADEQUACY SUPPLY (Co•na1:e wllttndard) * YES ---YES ---YES** MITIGATION N/A N/A I ** FUNDING N/A N /.A ** * Specific drainage facilities will be required as individual projects are approved in Zone 2. ** Specific improvements and financing mechanism will be identified in Drainage Master Plan update. 66 DRAINAGE I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the City concurrent with development. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS As was indicated in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, drainage is distinguished from all other public facilities and improvements because by its very nature it is more accurately assessed as specific development plans are finalized. However, certain facilities may be necessary which are larger than those required from a single development project and, therefore, need to be identified so that proper funding can be collected for the construction of these facilities. A. Inventory 1. Existing Facilities Existing storm drain facilities are shown on "Drainage" Exhibit L on Page 64. There are two predominant sub-basins . within this Zone, the first drains generally north towards Buena Vista Creek. The second sub-basin drains south and joins an existing concrete lined channel that parallels Tamarack Avenue. It continues southerly and then westerly, finally emptying at Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Zone 2 includes portions of Master Plan Drainage Fee Areas 5, 8, and 9. All master plan facilities impacted by Zone 2 have been constructed with the exception of storm drain facility ''BC" and desiltation basin "BE". (Shown on Exhibit M "Drainage" on page 65.) These future facilities will be discussed below. 2. Future Facilities As mentioned above, there are two master planned drainage facilities impacted by Zone 2 which remain to be constructed. Drainage facility "BC'' is a proposed 36 inch storm drain to be located along the east side of El Camino Real, north of Tamarack Avenue. This faciliy is located within Drainage Fee Area 8 which by previous Council action is a no fee zone. This proposed facility will almost exclusively serve previously developed lands. As such, the installation of this facility will not be conditioned upon future development within Zone 2. The timing and financing will be determined in the revised Master Drainage Plan currently in process. 67 Desiltation basin BE ls located within Drainage Fee Area 9. Adequate funds exist within this fee zone to install this facility when desired by the City. Basin BE is located within Zone 14 and was intended to service areas within Zones 2, 7 ~nd 14. Silt generation within Zone 2 is partially mitigated by an existing permanent siltation basin located north of Tamarack Avenue and east of Pontiac Drive. Engineering staff has determined existing siltation control within this portion of Zone 2 to be adequate and have, therefore, not requested installation of basin BE. Basin BE will be further addressed with Zones 7 and 14. In addition, to the above mentioned master planned facilities there will be a need to construct future improvements to the Buena Vista Creek channel in accordance with the guidelines adopted by Council on May 20, 1986 as part of the Buena Vista Lagoon Watershed Sediment Control Plan prepared by ~une. Applegate. This report presents general guidelines for the development of the Buena Vista Creek Channel to prevent additional future sedimentation of the Buena Vista Lagoon. In order to assure compliance with these guidelines staff will be recommending a special condition be applied to future developments within Zone 2 which drain to the Buena Vista Creek. B. Phasing Since the demand for future drainage facilities within Zone 2 will be localized and generated by specific development, it will be addressed as the development occurs. C. Adequacy Findings Drainage facilities within Zone 2 currently meet the adopted performance standard. Staff is recommending one special condition which will assure that future development within Zone 2 which drains to the Buena Vista Creek will comply with the adopted sediment control guidelines. III. A. MITIGATION Special Condition for Zone 2 No building or development permits shall be issued for any portion of Zone 2 which drains to the Buena Vista Creek unless it incorporates into the design of the project all conditions of the Buena Vista Lagoon and Watershed Sediment Control Plan, as prepared by June Applegate and Associates on September 3, 1985. B. Financing No special financing ls required since projects will incorporate mitigation within their design. 68 69 QRCULATION CIRCULATION Roads and Intersections ZOHE t Q PFF TRAFFIC SIGNAL ZONE 2 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 70 I I I -I I I -I Cll y of Cart11bad Growrh ~Qilfflet'H Proa,a,n JANUARY 1987 BUILDOUT LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2 CIRCULATION SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ccdat,IWl&::e w/8tamrd) MITIGATION FUNDING EXISTING * *· YES NIA NIA APPROVED ** ** NO SEE PAGE 76 SEE PAGE 80 (!J z -(/) < J: .. ~ FUTURE *** *** ---NIA NIA * All impacted road segment or intersections conform with the adopted performance standard. ** Two impacted intersections are non-conforming at traffic levels generated with existing plus approved projects. (See Pages 76 and 77.) *** Zone 2's buildout is so minimal it will not affect the circulation service levels of any impacted road segment or intersections. 71 CIRCULATION I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No road segment or intersection in th~ zone nor any road segment or intersection out of the zone which is impacted by development in the zone shall be projected to exceed a service level C during off-peak hours, nor service level D during peak hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by the Local Facilities Management Zone will use the road segment or intersection. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or not the circulation system within Zone 2 conforms to the adopted performance standards for Zone 2. It will also address all Circulation Element Roads and Intersections outside of Zone 2 impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by Zone 2 to ensure confor~ance with the adopted performance standard. Improvements that will be needed to completely develop the Circulation Element roads such as sidewalks, street lights, etc., are discussed separately for informational purposes, in Appendix 5, Page 149. A. Inventory The following Circulation Element Roads and Intersections meet the impacted criteria for Zone 2. See Page 72 for "Circulation Element Roads and Intersections" that are located within Zone 2. Roads 1. Pontiac (Elm to Tamarack) 2. El Camino Real (Hosp Way to Highway 78) 3. Elm (El Camino Real to Avenida de Anita) 4. Haymar (El Camino Real east) 5. Marron (El Camino Real east) Intersections 1 • El Camino Real/Marron 2. El Camino Real/Hosp Way 3. El Camino Real/Elm 4. El Camino Real/Chestnut 5. El Camino Real/Tamarack 6. Pontiac/Elm 7. Pontiac/Tamarack 72 B. Phasing Zone 2 is an infill zone with a small amount of development potential remaining to completely buildout the Zone. There are currently 451 approved residential units of which 151 cannot pull building permits until a Local Plan is approved. Additionally, there ls the potential for 134 more residential units. The residential development in this Zone has been phased out through 1995. There are no approved non-residential land uses in this Zone, although there are four remaining parcels totaling nine acres that have the projected potential of developing 156,815 square feet of commercial uses. The non-residential phasing of this remaining vacant land is projected to be completely built out in 1990. The Zone 2 Circulation section has not been phased on a yearly basis which is consistent with the plans for Zones 1 through 6. Those zones were not phased on a yearly basis because the Barton-Aschman traffic study, which is the source for this analysis, was set up to analyze traffic at three threshold points; at existing development, at existing plus committed development, and at bufldout. For this reason, plus the fact that the zone is almost built out, staff determined this method of analysis was consistent with the phasing requirement outlined in Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. c. Adequacy Findings The following chart indicates the existing and existing plus committed levels of service for each of the road segments or intersections impacted by Zone 2. These levels of service were obtained from the preliminary draft traffic study prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates. Existing Existing/Committed A.M. P.H. A.M. P.M. Peak Peak Peak Peak El Camino Real/ Marron A B A D El Camino Real/ Elm A A B F* El Camino Real/ Chestnut A B A B El Camino Real/ Tamarack A A F* F* 73 El Camino Real/ Hosp Way Pontiac/Elm** Pontiac/Tamarack** Existing A.M. P.M. Peak Peak A A A A A A Existing/Committed A.M. P.M. Peak Peak A B C A C D * At existing plus committed these intersections fall below the adopted performance standard. See below for mitigation measures. ** level of service determined by City staff. Existing levels of service are based on actual traffic counts at these intersections. The existing plus committed levels of service are projected based upon a sophisticated modeling technique that determines traffic assignments f~om committed projects. These trip assignments are added to actual traffic volumes to determine existing plus committed levels of service. All impacted road segments and intersections currently comply with the adopted performance standard. At the existing plus committed phase, all impacted road segments continue to comply with the adopted standard, however, two intersections are projected to fall below the adopted performance standards. These intersections are: 1. El Camino Real/Elm 2. El Camino Real/Tamarack III. MITIGATION The Barton-Aschman traffic report recommends the following improvements to these impacted intersections which will enable them to conform with the adopted performance standard. El Camino Real at Elm Avenue It is anticipated that this intersection will operate at level of Service Band F during the morning and afternoon peak periods, respectively. To provide level of service A and D during the respective peak periods, the improvements shown in Figure 3-16 should be implemented. The improvements Include widening Elm Avenue at the intersection to provide an additional eastbound and westbound lane and widening El Camino Real at the 74 intersection to th~ full width of a lanes and one left-turn-only lane). the intersection would meet the buildout. Estimated cost is ~42,500. El Camino Real at Tamarack Avenue prime arterial (three through With the proposed mitigation performance standard through Without mitigation measures, it is anticipated that this intersection will operate a Level of Service F during both peak periods. In order to mitigate the unacceptable levels of service, the improvements shown in Figure 3-15 on the following page should be provided. These improvements consist of restriping to provide optional through and turn lanes for the east and west approaches, widening of the southbound approach to provide one additional lane and widening the northbound approach to provide two left-turn-only, two right-turn-only and three through lanes. The result of these improvements would be level of Service D during the peak periods. With the proposed mitigation the intersection would meet the performance standard through buildout. Estimated cost is $179,000. A. Timing of Mitigation Th~ two intersections that are projected to fall below the adopted performance standard (El Camino Real at both Tamarack Avenue and Elm Avenue) will do so as a result of existing plus approved traffic. Therefore, before any development in Zone 2 (including approved but not constructed) ls allowed to proceed, improvement as listed in the mitigation above must be guaranteed for construction. B. Financing The intersections that have been identified as not meeting the adopted performance standard are Traffic Impact Fee intersections. To date, adequate impact fees needed to fund the recommended mitigations have not been collected. It is recommended that prior to any new construction in Zone 2 the developer(s) be required to finance the mitigation projects to bring the Tamarack/El Camino Real and Elm/El Camino Real, intersections into conformance with the performance standard. Since future intersection improvements were to be financed out of traffic impact fees, the developer(s) may request a reimbursement agreement for the costs of improving the intersection. 75 MUL TIF AMIL V RESIDENTIAL UNDER CONSTRUCTION 6i. l l t.. J .. It.. '- .s. ' J • ( _. V ""I .. ~ SINGLE F AMIL V _, '\ t t 1-< RESIDENTIAL UJ a: UNDER 0 CONSTRUCTION ~ I 0 _, w EXHIBIT N .... \.._170(420) 0 -10 0 C\I II) .... ... I") 0 -... ... 0 0 -,... ,;t 4 70( 110) 0 10 C\I ) l l ,90(80) 0(0) _j l t ( 60(110) __,. .... -.... 0 0 0 co ,;t ... -II) ... 40(240)' 0 -... 10 .... 0 ... 0 10 4" co PEAK HOUR VOLUMES AM (PM) BANK · ELM AVE ~ VACANT SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 6 EL CAMINO REAL AT ELM AVENUE n N ~BA~R~TO~N~-A~SC~HM~A~NqA~SS~O~Cl~ATr!E~S. ~IN~c.::;;:;:~;~;:;::;:;:;;;:;;:;:;:;;;;:::::::::::::::::::::~ FIGURE (EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED CONDITIONS) U3-16 76 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL EXHIBIT 0 .... l'-60(70) ,... 0 '° 0 CD --0 .... 0 ... 0 It) .... "' .... 0 "' 0 4 160(300) '° ... If) ) l l. ,840(9490) 80(80)--' 1 t ( 160(210) .. -.... .... 0 0 0 °' "' u, ,... It) CD 650(390), .... ... .... 0 ... 0 ... (") '° "' "' "' '° PEAK HOUR VOLUMES AM (PM) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL i.. TAMARACK AVE ~ ._ r "\"\tttrr VACANT SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT 6 EL CAMINO REAL AT TAMARACK AVENUE n N :i-:e.a.=-R~TO~N~-AS~C~HM~A~N;;;.,.A~SS~OC;;;;;;IA""""T"""'ES~. 1"'"'N~C.---~~;.;..;.;.~~~-=-~;....---------__. FIGURE (EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED CONDITION) LJ3-15 77 PAGE 78 WAS NOT USED 79 RRE t * FIii. ITATIONI-EXISTING 0 l'lltl STATIONl-ltLAN .. D II mlnutel FIRE RESPONSE TIME --STATION 1 --STATION 2 •• -STATION I ■--STATION 4 ZONE 2 ZONE 2 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 80 I I FIRE e .. ,.,c ...... OrowtftW.._..,...., • .,,. ~ JANUARY 188i L O C A L . F A C I L I T I E S M A N ·A G E M E N T P L A N -Zone 2 FIRE . SUMMARY SHEET BUILDOUT ADEQUACY PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (C cdorn'alce MIT/GA T/ON FUNDING w/Standard) EXISTING 1,993 Units * YES NIA NIA APPROVED 451 Units * YES NIA NIA (!) z -Cl) < :::c n. FUTURE 2,578 Units * YES NIA NIA * The existing Fire Station locations will guarantee compliance with the adopted performance standard at all times as the Zone builds out. · 81 FIRE I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No more than 1,500 dwelling units outside of a five minute response time. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory Zone 2 is presently served by and within the five minute response time of Fire Station No. 3, located at 3701 Catalina Drive. A portion of the zone also is within the five minute response time of Fire Station No. 1, located at 1275 Elm Avenue. B. Phasing Because Zone 2 is almost entirely built out and because future development will be minimal, there will be· no impact on conformance with the adopted performance standard. Therefore, it was not necessary to do a phasing analysis for fire services in Zone 2. For informational purposes, Station No. 3 is going to be relocated to the intersection of Tamarack and Elm Avenues to better serve those areas of the City to the east and north of the existing location near Chestnut. The relocation has been scheduled for 1990-91 and will be funded through Public Facilities Fees. Zone 2 will remain within the five minute response time of the relocated station. C. Adequacy Findings During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, it was determined that Zone 2 presently meets the fire performance standard and will continue to conform to this standard to buildout of the City. III. MITIGATION A. Special Conditions for Zone 2 No conditions because Fire Station minute response time No. 1 also provides within five minutes. B. Financing are necessary for fire services in Zone 2 No. 3 is located within the required five of the entire zone. In addition, Station back-up response to a portion of Zone 2 All fire facilities are in place for Zone 2 and the required performance standard has beeri met and, therefore, no special funding mechanisms are required. 82 83 OPEN SPACE ZONE 1 k/::joPEN SPACE ZONE 2 LOCAL FACILITIES OPEN SPACE -~-~:' \ -:::::::::::::::::.:-\ -\ -\ \ MANAGEMENT 84 \ ZONE 7 -\ \ -\ -\ -\ . \ -\ -I I I I I I I ~-.!;! City or C•tl•b•d 0,owth M•"-c.•mtnf Prog, tm JANUARY 1887 PLAN LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2 OPEN SPACE SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY BU/LDOUT MITIGATION FUNDING PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Cu.lorma1ce w/St81dard) EXISTING * * YES N/A APPROVED * * YES N/A C, z -en < :c Q. FUTURE * * YES N/A * Zone 2 as determined in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan will conform to the adopted performance standard at all times as the Zone ·builds out. 85 N/A ·- N/A N/A OPEN SPACE I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone exclusive of environmentally constrained non-developable land must be set aside for permanent open space and must be available concurrent with development. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory Open Space in Zone 2 falls into several categories: City Park (Larwin), powerline easements, open space easements, and miscellaneous City owned land. See the breakdown by acreage below. Open Space Larwin Park Powerline easements Open Space easements City owned vacant land Miscellaneous Acres 22.2 11.8 43.8 14.6 6.9 99.3 Although not calculated, overall consideration was given to the Zone in terms of large residential lots (7,500 square feet or more) providing generally more openness within the neighborhoods of the Zone. B. Phasing Because Zone 2 is an infill zone with no future opportunity to increase open space, the phasing requirements for Open Space were not addressed as required by Chapter 21.90.110(d)(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. c. Adequacy Findings During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, it was determined that Zone 2, as an infill area, already exceeds the adopted performance standard for Open Space and no further review was deemed necessary. III. A. MITIGATION Special Conditions for Zone 2 There are no special conditions which apply at this time. 86 8. Financing Because Zone 2 creates a minimal amount of future development, it has been determined that this development will continue to meet the adopted performance standard. Therefore, financing was not addressed as required by Chapter 21.90.110(d)(3) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 87 88 SCHOOLS SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ZONE 2 to ZONE 2 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 89 t CllyolC•l■- Q,owtf, MINQeffl.,. "'•""' 5 JANUARY 1987 EXISTING • ELEMENTARY • JUNIOR HIGH .. HIGH SCHOOL ~ 0 ELEMENTARY □ JUNIOR HIGH ~ HIGH SCHOOL ZONE 2 ZONE 2 I I I I I ---'a PAl0M41t I I I \ 'to, ', (, ' c, ',, 0 ,,,- ',, 6,//,, '✓ C' / ' .... , ,I' \ "°'o .,,,.-,,,, \= I 1< ,o I I I SCHOOLS ~-r--------.--:i ' I I I I ID I \ ' '-'-'--... 0 ' ' ' \ ,o I~ I \ .. \<'-r I I I I City of C•11HO Gto•lfl Mantge"'-'f ,._~_,,. JANUARY 1887 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 90 LOCAL . FA C I L IT I ES MA N·A G E M E N T PL A N -Zone 2 BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION EXISTING * ---APPROVED C, z -"' < ::c ' a. FUTURE ** SCHOOLS SUMMARY SHEET SUPPLY ADEQUACY (CCdCA11•a w/llta'ldard) * YES ---YES ** YES MIT/GA TION N/A N/A N/A FUNDING N/A N/A N/A * The Carlsbad Unified School District has capacity to m~et the existing demands generated from Zone 2. ** Because the future school demand from Zone 2 ls minimal, the School District has indicated that it ls able to provide capacity at all times as the Zone builds out. 91 SCHOOLS I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS School capacity to meet the projected enrollment within the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory Zone 2 falls completely within the boundaries of th~ Carlsbad Unified School District. Currently, there are no schools in the Northeast Quadrant, although in September, 1987, Hope Elementary School in Calavera Hills is expected to open. Elementary school students in Zone 2 attend Buena Vista or Kelly Elementary Schools. Secondary school students attend Carlsbad Junior and Senior High Schools. The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan identifies general locations for future school sites in each school category. The locations are a result of the School Master location Study, completed in 1982. The Carlsbad Unified School District is in the process of beginning to update the School Master Location Plan. B. Phasing In Zone 2 there are 1,993 existing residential dwelling units. As the zone builds out, there will be an additional 585 residential dwelling units. These units will add approximately 200 to 250 students to the school demand generated by Zone 2. The Carlsbad Unified School District has indicated the ability to handle the additional demand. Based upon the School District's indication, the adopted performance standard will continue to be met, and therefore, phasing of school facilities was not addressed as required by Chapter 21.90.110(d)(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. c. Adequacy Findings The Carlsbad Unified School District ls currently providing capacity for the existing demand generated by Zone 2. The School District has indicated its ability to provide capacity to the ultimate buildout of Zone 2. The City's. General Plan shows two future elementary school sites in Zone 2. The. site in the southern portion was never needed by the District and other development has occurred there. The site to the north ls partially located in Zone 25 --the area ls undeveloped designated open space, and could be utilized as a school site at a future date. 92 III. MITIGATION A. Special Conditions for Zone 2 No conditions are necessary. The Carlsbad Unified School District has indicated they will be able to accommodate the additional number of students generated through the buildout of Zone 2. B. Financing No financing options are necessary. The Carlsbad School District has indicated that they can accommodate the additional students generated in Zone 2 with existing facilities. Since existing facilities can handle the additional students, no financing alternatives for new facilities are required. All future development will be required to pay the appropriate school fees as determined by the District. 93 94 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM ZONE 2 ZONE 2 SEWER DISTRICTS 10 r-··, . -I L ....... . ~ I i nunn■n1■11n11,I I : SAN MARCOS I : ...... , ...... LEUCADIA COUNTY cos,_ .. t JANUARY 1887 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 95 I ZONE 1 ZONE 2 SEWER SYSTEM 71 ~ rr::;;;;:::::.._~~ -- ZONE 7 l I I I :L CD I I tf Vt Cllr ef Cerl1bed M1neo•m•nt Proo,'"' JANUARY 1987 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 96 BUILDOUT L O C A L . F A C I L I TI E S M A N ·A (3 E M E N T PL A N -Zone 2 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Contornw,ce w/StlS!dard) MIT/GA TION FUNDING * EXISTING **' NO SEE PAGE 100 SEE MGD PAGE 101 ** * APPROVED ** NO ·SEE PAGE 100 SEE PAGE 101 MGD C, z ** -en < :c 0. * FUTURE ** YES N/A N/A MGD ** * Interceptors are not monitored for existing capacity. Theoretical flows based on sewer generation rates are shown by reach on Tables 3, 4, and 5. ** Demand analysis for critical reaches of the El Camino Real/Kelly, North Agua Hedionda and Vista/Carlsbad Interceptors are shown on Tables 3, 4, and 5. 97 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Trunk line appropriate sewer development. capacity to meet demand as determined by the district must be provided concurrent with II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Service Area Zone 2 lies entirely within and is served by the City of Carlsbad sewer service district. Facility Inventory and Description Zone 2 is located in the northeast quadrant of the City of Carlsbad and is split between two major drainage basins. The sewage generated in the northern portion of Zone 2, referred to as Subbasin 2A, flows northward into the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor. The southern portion of Zone 2, referred to as Subbasin 2B, flows south through a collection system in El Camino Real and Kelly Drive and eventually flows into the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor. The North Agua Hedionda Interceptor flows westerly and is pumped through Foxes Landing Lift Station into the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor. Thus, all flow from this Zone eventually reaches the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor. The interior of Zone 2 is served by a number of sewer lines. All of these sewer lines are shown on Page 96. Near the northern section of Zone 2 there are two connections to the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor. The first connection is in Haymar Drive, east of El Camino Real. It serves the neighborhood shopping center east of El Camino Real. The second connection is just west of Zone 2 in the Plaza Camino Real Shopping Center. This connection carries most of the flow from Subbasin 2A. All flows to the south collect at the intersection of Tamarack Avenue and El Camino Real and flow through ·the North Agua Hedionda trunk system to the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor. With the exception of the Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor, all sewer collection facilities within Zone 2 are owned and operated by the City of Carlsbad. The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is jointly owned by the City of Vista and the City of Carlsbad. The Encina Water Pollution Control facility (WPCF) is responsible for maintenance of this line. The North Agua Hedionda Interceptor serves Zones 1 and 2 and is currently serving Zone 7. 98 B. Service Demand Existing, committed, and future sewer collection demands are shown on Table 2, Sewer Demand Zone 2, on Page 104. The service demands have been divided by Drainage Basin to facilitate analysis of sewer line capacity. Facility Analysis Analysis of the Vista/Carlsbad and the El Camino Real/Kelly interceptors indicate that current demands exceed capacity and will not conform to the adopted performance standard. This situation will require mitigation. Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is the major trunk system serving the northerly half of the City. This line shown on the map on Page 103, loops the northeasterly and westerly perimeters of the City extending along Route 78 from the Emerald Avenue interchange to the Buena Vista Lagoon then along Jefferson and Grand Avenµe to the Santa Fe railroad then extending south to the Encina treatment plant. The Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor is a major regional trunk accepting flows from Growth Management Zones 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 24 and 25, as well as the City of Vista. The analysis of capacity of this facility shown on Table 3 "Capacity of Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor", on Page 105 indicates that the City of Carlsbad currently exceeds its capacity ownership in reaches E-4, F-1 and F-2. These segments extend through Zone 1 along Grand Avenue, then along the railroad to approximately the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. Replacement or paralleling of this portion was included in both the City of Vista and Carlsbad's budgets for construction in the 1987-88 fiscal year. The project is estimated at $1,840,000 of which $496,000 is attributed to Carlsbad. This project is not being actively pursued because the line does not appear to represent a maintenance concern under average daily flow characteristics. Capacity problems would only manifest themselves under peak wet weather flow conditions. North Agua Hedionda Interceptor Flows from Subbasin 2B collect at the intersection of Tamarack Avenue and El Camino Real where they enter the El Camino Real/Kelly Drive reaches leading to the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor. The lines extend southerly along El Camino Real to Kelly Drive, then southwesterly on Kelly Drive to Park Drive, along Park Drive to Marina where the line proceeds north along the Agua Hedionda Lagoon to the Fox Landing lift station. The lift station then pumps flows into the Vista/Carlsbad trunk in the vicinity of Olive Avenue. These lines are shown the exhibit on Page 102. 99 Analysis of the North Agua Hedionda and El Camino Real/Kelly Interceptors systems are complicated by the fact that flows from Zone 7 have been diverted into these systems pending completion and activiation of the Calavera Hills reclamation facility. Analysis of these systems are shown on Tables 4 and 5, on Pages 106 and 107. This analysis indicates that capacity problems currently exist in all reaches of the El Camino Real/Kelly interceptor extending from Park Drive to Tamarack Av~nue. The estimated cost to upgrade this line to accommodate Zone 2 flows is $36,500. Upgrading to accept Zone 7 flows would require an additional expenditure of $10,000. The remainder of the North Agua Hedionda Interceptor is able to accept Zone 1 and 2 flows in compliance with the adopted performance standard. Should Zone 7 flows continue to be diverted to this line, the Kelly Drive portion of the trunk will require further upgrading at an estimated cost of $1~0,000. Fox's Landing Lift Station Analysis of Fox's Landing lift station indicates that the pump station ls currently operating at capacity and requires upgrading to accommodate flows from both Zones 1 and 2 through buildout. Additional upgrades will be required to accommodate increas~d flows from Zone 7 (Calavera Hills). This upgrading will be required to be shown in the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 7. c. Adequacy Findings Both the Interceptor sewers Vista/Carlsbad and El Camino Real/Kelly are experiencing capacity problems at the strategy to mitigate this non-conforming be adopted prior to approval of further Zone 2. current time. A situation should development within MITIGATION III. A. Special Conditions for Zone 2 Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor -Subbasin 2A Reaches E-4, F-1 and F-2 of the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor fail to meet the standard. No further development shall proceed in Subbasin 2A until agreement has been reached with the City of Vista and a schedule ls established for upgrading of the deficient reaches. El Camino Real/Kelly Interceptor -Subbasin 2B The El Camino Real/Kelly interceptor currently fails to meet the performance standards. No further development shall be allowed in Subbasin 2B until agreements or contracts have been executed to upgrade the deficient reaches. 100 B. Financing Funds are budgeted in Carlsbad's portion of the additional funds are required. pursued with the City of Vista. the sewer construction fund for Vista/Carlsbad upgrading. No The project should be actively Upgrading of Reaches E and F of the El Camino Real/Kelly Interceptor is currently under design and planned for construction in early summer of 1987. The upgrading of the El Camino Reaches are only partially funded under the adopted sewer master plan. Funds of $19,427 have been targeted for this upgrade. Remaining funds shall be reimbursed by the remaining development within the subbasin. The City initially should contribute funds to upgrade the line to accept Zone 7 flows and receive reimbursement of those funds from Zone 7 development. 101 ZONE 2 EL CAMINO REAL/ KELLY DRIVE SEWER SYSTEM ABANDONED ~ N -N.T. S. EXHIBIT P Cllr ol c.,,,t,1d Gto•I" M1n.agtmtnt Pioo,,,.. JANUARY 1887 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 102 ZONE·2 FOXES LANDING PS 8 FORCE MAIN Bl ?Al.OMAR SEWER COLLECTION V lat a-Carl a bad Interceptor 2 EL CAMINO REAL / KELLY DR SEWER SYSTEM Agua Hedlonda cu, or ca,11t:1d Gllowltl Menao•,.,•"' Ptaa,1m JANUARY 188i LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 103 ..... 0 ~ . Drainage Basin Subbasin 2A Vista/Carlsbad Interceptor Subbasin 2B North Agua Hedionda Interceptor 1. EDUs Demand Status Existing Committed Future Existing Committed Future TABLE 2 SEWER DEMAND ZONE 2 Land Use Acres/Square Footage Number of Units Residential 955 Commercial 251,500 sq. ft . Office 15,000 sq. ft. N/A Residential 129 Commercial 0 Office 156,800 sq. ft. Residential 1,321 Residential 168 Residential 5 Equivalent Dwelling Units Demand (EDUs) l Demand Subtotal (EDUs)l 955 140 8 1,103 129 0 87 216 Total 1,319 1,321 1,321 168 168 5 5 Total 1,494 .... 0 VI Section B-1 B-2 B-3 C & D E-1 E-2 E-3 E-.4 F-1 F-2 F-3 G H-1 H-2 H-3 TABLE 3 -ZONE 2 CAPACITY OF VISTA/CARLSBAD INTERCEPTOR (BASED ON 246 GALLONS PER EDU AND A PEAKING FACTOR OF 2.0} Size Slope Total Capacity Carlsbad Carlsbad Capacity Estimated % Ownership Carlsbad Flows MGD EDU MGD EDU MGD EDU 36" .50% 30.0 60,976 0 0 0 0 0 42" .28% 34.0 69,106 15. 5 5.3 10,772 0 0 32" .20% 19.5 39,634 15.5 3.0 6,098 .5 1,016 Pumping 10.5 21,341 15. 5 1.6 4,878 • 5 1,016 Station & Force Main 24 11 + 27" .80% + 36% 12.0 24,390 27.3 3.3 6,707 .5 1,016 3011 .24% 13.0 26,423 27.3 3.5 7,114 1.5 3,049 27" 1.64% 25.0 50,813 27.3 6.8 13,821 3.0 6,098 36" .10% 13.8 28,049 27.3 3.8 7,724 5.0 10,163 36" .10% 13.8 28,049 37.3 5. 1 10,366 5.5 11, 1 79 36" .10% 13,8 28,049 37.3 5.1 10,366 7.5 15,244 42" .10% 20.S 41,667 37.3 7.6 15,447 7.5 15,244 Pumping 17.5 35,569 38.5 6.7 16,260 7.5 15,244 Station & Force Main 4211 .10% 20.5 41,667 51. 7 10.6 21,545 7.5 15,244 42" .10% 20.5 41,667 51. 7 10.6 21,545 7.5 15,244 42" .12% 22,8 46,341 . 51. 7 11 .8 23,984. 7.5 15,244 1. These flows are based on observation and pump capacities. These numbers will be refined when flow measuring is complete. EDUs in Interceptor Available Deficient 0 --10,772 --5,082 -- 3,862 -- 5,691 --4,065 -- 7,723 ----2,439 --813 --4,878 203 -- 1,016 -- 6,301 -- 6,301 -- 8,740 -- ,..... 0 °' Reach Size Slope MGD G 8" I.SO% .96 F 8" 1.00% .78 E 10" ,60% 1.10 D 12" .60% I. 78 C 12" 1.50% 2.82 B 12" 1.00% 2.30 A 12" .92% 2.21 TABLE 4 -ZONE 2 Capacity of El Camino Real/Kelly Drive Sewer System (Based on 246 gallons per EDU and a Peaking Factor of 2.5) Capacity EDU Contribution EDU Existing Committed Potential Totals 1,554 1,391 168 5 1,564 1,268 1,101 1,022 1,473 3,596 1, 782 20 0 116 136 2,894 177 0 28 205 4,585 0 0 0 0 3,740 0 0 0 0 3,593 0 0 0 0 1. This includes 904 existing, 1,022 units committed and 1,000 units potential from Zone 7. EDUs in Interceptor Total Available Deficient I, 564 -10 5, 1601 -3,892 5,296 -3,514 5,501 -2,607 5,501 -916 S,501 -1,761 5,501 -1,908 -0 ...,. TABLE 6 "'ZONE 2 Capacity of North Agua Hedionda Interceptor (Based on 246 gallons per £DU and a Peaking Factor of 2.5) ·capac it J EDU Contribution Section Size Slope HGD EDU Existing Committed Potential NAH-1 21" .36% 6.14 9,984 590 26 110 NAH-2 24" .10% 4.62 7,512 117 0 0 NAH-3 2411 .10% 4.62 7,512 3,032 1,236 1,772 NAH-4 Siphon 2-16" 6.288 10,224 114 100 114 1-10" NAH-5 24" .15% 5.66 9,203 835 195 195 Pu■p Station & ----0 0 0 Force Ma in NAH-6 18" 1.0% 10.50 17,073 0 0 0 1. These units will eventually flow to the South Agua Hedionda Interceptor. 2. This includes 904 existing, 1,022 units committed and 1,000 units potential from Zone 7. EDUa in Interceptor Totals Total Available 716 1 716 9,268 117 1,214 6,298 6,0402 7,254 258 328 7,582 2,642 1,097 8,679 524 0 8,679 - 0 8,679 8,394 108 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ZONE 2 WA TEA SERVICE DISTRICTS ZONE 2 COS I A ID ;t .... 1tH111111111 i I /SAN MARCOS : :: : :: , ............................... . i : : ◄ v, OLIVENHA/N Cit.-at C•tlNd Growrft Menagemenr Pro••"" D1 JANUARY 198; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 109 ZONE 1 -EXISTING WA H,R LINES •••• PROPOSED WATER LINES A EXISTING PRESSURE REGULATING STATION l:::,_ PROPOSED PRESSURE REGULATINO STATION _,. ZONE BOUNDARY ZONE 2 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN llO WATER SYSTEM ZONE 7 City arc .. 1a111ad ar .. lft Man.a•m•nt Ptogr■• JANUARY 1887 LOCAL "FACILITIES MAN·AGEMENT PLAN-Zone 2 WATER .DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM SUMMARY SHEET ADEQUACY BUILDOUT DEMAND PROJECTION SUPPLY (CCHOllmalCe MITIGATION FUNDING wl8t...,d) EXISTING * * YES NIA * * YES N/A APPROVED C, z -0 < J: Q. FUTURE ** ** YES N/A * The Costa Real Water District has capacity to meet the existing demands of Zone 2. N/A N/A N/A ** Because the future demands from Zone 2 will be minimal, the Water District has lrdicated that it will be able to provide capacity at all times as the Zone builds out. 111 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEN I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Line appropriate development. capacity to meet demand as determined by the water district must be provided concurrent with A minimum 10 day average storage capacity must be provided prior to any development. II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS A. Inventory and Description Water service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three independent agencies, Costa Real Municipal Water District, San Marcos County Water District, and the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. Water service for Zone 2 is provided entirely by the Costa Real Municipal Water District. Costa Real Municipal Water District has identified those facilities which need to be added, upgraded, and improved in order to meet the needs of future growth within their service area. The facilities shown on map, "Water Distribution System" on Page 110 are currently in place and servicing the existing development. The residential units remaining in Zone 2 (585 units) will have a minimal impact on the existing water system. When the remaining office uses develop, certain facilities will need to be added to service this new demand. As identified by the Costa Real Municipal Water District, these facilities will be financed by direct developer contribution. B. Phasing The performance standard indicates that line capacity must meet demand as determined by the appropriate water district. Costa Real Municipal Water District has indicated that improvements remaining in Zone 2, can be handled at the time the remaining office and residential sites develop. c. Adequacy Findings The Costa Real Municipal Water District service to Zone 2 conforms with the adopted performance standard. Because this zone ls almost completely built out, the additional water demands as determined by the Costa Real Municipal Water District, will be minimal and conformance with the standard will be maintained to the ultimate buildout of Zone 2. 112 III. A. MITIGATION Special Conditions for Zone 2 All development within Zone 2 shall pay the required Costa Real Municipal Water District fees. B. Financing Remaining facilities and improvements in Zone 2 will be financed by the Costa Real Municipal Water District's Capital Fund. Revenues for that budget are funded from direct developer contributions to the District. 113 114 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 115 ADT Average daily daily vehicle trips associated region. CLOSSARY trips. A guide of average, or estimated generated from a specific project or APN Assessor's Parcel Number. A portion of the legal description which specifically identifies each parcel of land. Bulldout The year when the City of Carlsbad is completely developed with all associated public facilities in place. Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District -A district established to fund major thoroughfares and bridge improvements. These bridge improvements are at I-5; Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia lane, and la Costa Avenue. See Exhibit S, Page 125. CIP -Abbreviation for Capital Improvement Program. Community Park 20 -50 acres in size; designed to serve the broad recreational needs of several neighborhoods; located adjacent to secondary arterial or greater; publicly owned. Demand -The amount of needed facility generated within the zone, quadrant, or City based upon the adopted performance standard. DU -Abbreviation for dwelling unit. EDU Equivalent dwelling unit. The average amount of sewage generated by a single family household per day. Commercial and industrial developments are also converted into EDU's to assess their direct impact upon facilities. Environmentally Constrained Lands -Beaches, wetlands, floodways, other water bodies, riparian and woodland habitats, slopes greater than 251, major roadways, railroad tracks, and major powerllne easements. 116 General Plan Density Ranges Residential Land Use Allowed Units Per Acre RL -Residential Low RLM -Residential Low-Medium RM -Residential Medium RMH -Residential Medium-High RH Residential High Growth Management Control Point 0 - 0 - 4.0 - 8.0 - 15.0 1.5 4.0 8.0 15.0 23.0 Residential Land Use Allowed Units Per Acre RL RLM RM RMH RH 1. 0 3.2 6.0 11. 5 19.0 Established based upon the overall average land use yield in each designation or the midpoint of the density range. ICU -Abbreviation for Intersection Capacity Unit. The ratio of traffic demands to be placed on an intersection in relation to the capacity of an intersection. Level of Service The relative level of operation of an intersection or traffic signal. Level of Service (LOS) A B Description Free flow (relatively). If signalized, conditions are such that no approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits through more than one red indication. Very slight or no delay. Stable flow. If signalized, an occa- sional approach phase is fully utilized; vehicle platoons are formed. This level is suitable operation for rural design purposes. Slight delay. 117 ICU Value 0.00-0.60 0.61-0.70 Level of Service (LOS) C D E F Description Stable flow of operation. If signalized, drivers occasionally may have to wait through more than one red indication. Acceptable delay. Approaching unstable flow or operation; queues develop, but are periodically cleared. Tolerable delay. Unstable flow or operation; the inter- section has reached ultimate capacity; this condition is not uncommon in peak hours. Congestion and intolerable delay. Forced flow or operation. Intersection operates below capacity. ICU Value 0.71-0.80 0.81-0.90 0.91-1.00 1.00+ Derived from: Highway Capacity Manual, HRB Special Report 87. MGD Million gallons a day. A term used to describe flow of water or sewage. Net Vacant Acres Obtained by subtracting all of the 100% -----,---,------constrained acres and one-half of the areas shown as 25-40% slopes. Industrial and commercial development were then multiplied by .4 to determine net acreage (this allows for all regulations which affect overall lot coverage). Open Space Pocket parks, homeowner ball fields, planned residential development (PRD), common areas, tennis courts, or other areas containing passive or active recreational facilities, such as major power line easements. PIL Park-in-Lieu Fee. A fee paid prior to the issuance of building permits in lieu of land dedication for park purposes. PFF -Public Facility Fee. A 2.51 fee paid prior to the issuance of building permits. All proceeds from this fund are used for the purpose of acquiring, building, improving, expanding and equipping public property, improvements, and facilities. 118 Special Use Area -1-5 acres in size; a local facility of only one or two activity type uses, i.e., tennis court, swimming pool, etc. TIF Traffic Impact Fee. A fee paid at issuance of building permits for various traffic circulation improvements. The City is divided into two fee categories: 1) The la Costa area and 2) the remainder of the City. See Exhibit T, on Page 126. Turn Key Facility -a f aci 11 ty constructed by developer (·s) and turned over or dedicated to the City after its completion. 119 ZONE 2 POINSETTIA lN .. 1111111 AREA BOUNDARY ZONE 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE MELROSE AVE Cny of c .. 1tbad Gro•tft MIINlg,am.,,, Program, JANUARY 1987 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 120 BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE PISTRICT · ZONE 2 ~ DISTRICT BOUNDARY ZONE 2 LOCAL FACILITIES MAN~GEMENT PLAN 121 MELROSE AVE City of Ca,IINd Oro.Ill M.,..""'.,., P,«, •m JANUARY 1987 APPENDIX 2 122 l: 2 ii 3 :1 I 4! 5! I I 61 I ,I ! a: :, 9:1 1011 11I i 12,1 Q 13 ii C IZI I <II ... I ~ ~ ., • U III C 14:, g I' °:I i : z 0 g -"' 15:f IZI □ 2 ~ "' ' ... u ~ >-... ■ 16,! z Ill ~ Q 111 Z C U 5 -IZI ' ., ! .. ~ 17 ·1 > .. a: C C >-u .. u 18 19 20.' 21 22, ,I 23: ' 24: 'I 25 26 I :I 27, 281: I, I' 1, d ii I :1 ,1RC"INANCF.: NO. 9808 ----- AN OPDINANCE OF T?E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CF CARLSBAD, CALIFnP~IA A~ENDI~G TITLE 21 CF T~E CARLSBAD ~U~ICIPAt CODE ~y T?E AO~ITION OF CHAPTEP 21. 90 ESTABLISHING A GROWTH ~NAGE~•E~T PROGRAM FOP THE CITY The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does ordain as follows: SECTION l: That Title 21 is amended by the addition ~f Chapter 21.90 to read as follows: Sections: 21.90.010 21.90.020 21.90.030 21.90.031 21.90.032 21.90.033 21.90.040 21.90.050 21.90.060 21.90.070 21.90.080 21.90.090 21.90.100 21.90.110 ,, 21.90.120 21.90.125 21.90.130 21. 90 .140 21.90.150 21.90.160 21.90.170 21.90.180 21.90.190 "Chapter 21.90 Growth ~anage~ent Purnose and intent. Definitions. General orohibition, exceotions. Tolling of ti~e for consideration of applications submitted before the effective date of this chapter • Tollina of expiration of previously issued development permits. Extensions of ?rior approvals orohibited. Como!iance with this chapter reauired. Establishment of local facilities ~anaqe~ent fee. Spec: al orov is ions for build i no pert" its issued during te~porary moratoriu~. Finding of health, safety and welfare necessary for the fees imoosed by sections 21.90.050 and 21.90.060. Perfor~ance standard. Citywide facilities and imorovements plan. Local facilities management zones. Contents ·of local facility rnanaqe~ent plans. 1 Facilities management olan oreoartion. Facilities manaaement plan orocessinc. Implementation of facilities and imorovements reauirements. Obligation to oay fees or install improvements reauired by any other law. Implementing guidelines. Exclusions. Council actions, fees, notice. Expiration of chapter. Severability. 1. 123 ' 5' I 61 I 71 el 91 I 101 . I 111 I ' ,, 1711 1a,: 19 20'' 21 .. 22, 26.: :! 27; 21.90.010 Puroose and intent. (a) !t is the policy of the City of Carlsbad to: ( l) Provide auality housi.na ocportunities fer: alt economic sectors of the cc~~unity; (2) Provide a balanced coff'rrunitv .,.,itti adecuate commercial, industrial, recreational and open space areas to r support the residential areas of the City: / (3) Ensure that public facilities and i~prove~entsl meeting City standards are available concurre~t with the need created by new development: I (4) Balance the housing needs of the reaion I aaainst the cublic service needs of Carlsbad residents and I available fiscal and environmental resources: : (5) Encouraae infill development in urbanized areas before allowina extensions of public facilities and improvements to areas which have yet to be urbanized: (6) Ensure that all development is consistent wit~ the Carlsbad qeneral plan: (7) Prevent growth unless adeauate public facilities and improvements are provided in a phased and logical fashion as reauired by the general plan: (8) Control of the timing and location of development by tyinq the oace of developfflent to the provision of public facilities and improvements at the times established by the citywide facilities and improvements plan. (b) The City Council of the City of Carlsbad has determined despite previous City Council actions includina but not limited to, aJ"endments to the land use, housinq, and oar~s and recreation elements of the general plan, amendments to City Council Policy No. 17, adoption of tr3ffic imoact fees, and modification of park dedication and imorovement reauirements, that the demand for facilities and imorovements has outpaced the supply resulting in shortages in public facilities and improvements, includina uut not limited to streets, parks, open space, schools, libraries, drainage facilities and general 1 governmental facilities. The City Council has further deter~ine1 that these shortages are detrimental to the public health, safet~ and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad. i (c) This chapter is adopted to ensure the implementation of the policies stated in subsection (al, to eliminate the shortages identified in subsection (bl, to ensure 1 that no,. development occurs without oroviding for adeauate facilities and improve~ents, to regulate the oace of ceveloo~ent thereby ensuring a continued supply of housing over a period of years and to continue the auality of life for all econo~ic sectors of the Carlsbad community. 1 (d) This chapter will further the policies, goals and : objectives established herein by reauirina identification of all; public facilities and improvements required for develop~ent, by i prohibiting develop~ent until adeauate provisions for the public; facilities and improvements are made by developers of projects · within the City, and by givinq development priority to areas of the City where public facilities and i~provements are already i~ place (infill areas). 2. 124 I ' i II I' I 1! •I I 2i 3' 4 5 6 7 8 I 91 10 11 12i 131 141 : I l5i 18 I 19· 20' 21,: 22: ii 23ii ·1 24 I '! :1 25; i 27, 28 ,. (e) This chapter replaces the te~oorary ~cratoriu~ ~~ processing and approval of develop~ent projects i~posed ~v =~~'l Council Ordinance No. 9791. 21.90.020 Definitions. Ca) Whenever the following terms are used in this chapter they shall have the meaning established by this section unless from the context it is apparent that another ~eanino is intended: - ( 1) "Citywide facilities and i?!loroverrents clan" , means a plan prepared and approved according to Section 21.90.0901 identifying those facilities and imorovements reauired on a citywide basis to serve the projected population of the City as established by the general plan and providing an outline and budget for financing certain facilities and il1'prove~ents which will be provided by the City. ( 2) • oevelopment pe·rmi t • means any pernii t, entitlement or approval whether discretionary or ministerial issued under Title 20 or 21 of this code and any leaislative actions such as zone chanaes, qeneral plan amendments, or master plan approval or amendment. · (3) •oevelopment• means any use to which land is put, building or other alteration of land and construction inciden~ thereto. (4) •Facilities• means any schools, parks, ooen space, or recreational areas or structures providina for fire, 1 ibrary, or governmental services, ide_nt if ied in a facilities management plan. (5) "Il1'provement• includes traffic cont.rols, streets and highways, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, bridges, overcrossings, street interchanaes, flood control or storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, water facilities and lighting facilities. (6) •tocal facilities management plan" ~eans a facilities manaael1'ent plan defined by Section 21.90.120 for a local facilities management zone which is established accordina to Section 21.90.100. 21.90.030 General rohibition, exceotions. a Unless exempted by the provisions of this chapter no application for any building permit or development oer~it shall be accepted, processed or aporoved until a citywide facilities and i~provements plan has been adopted and a local facilities management plan for the applicable local Eacili:ies 1 management zone has been subriti t ted and approved accord i na to t!i is1 chapter. I ( b) No zone change, general plan aJT1endt11ent, master olan a~endment or specific plan amend~ent which would incease the· i residential density or development intensity established by t~e general plan in effect on the effective date of this chaoter shall be approved unless an amend~ent to the citywide facilities ~anage~ent plan and the applicable local f~cilities ~anace~er.t olan has first been approved. 3. 125 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 I 14!1 151 I 16 i, 17 ii isii 19 ii 22:, ii 23;: 11 1: 24 !I 25 .' i 2s :I ;! 27 !' 28:: " 1, ' I I I I (c) The classes of projects or permits listed in this I subsection shall be exempt from the prov is ions of subsection (a).: Development permits and building permits for these projects I shall be·subject to any fees established pursuant to the citywicd facilities and improvement plan and any applicable local facilities management plan. {l) Redevelopment projects. {2) Projects consisting of the construction or alteration of a single dwelling structure for a fa~ily on a lot owned by the family intending to occupy the structure, or not to exceed one nonowner-occupied house per individual for one or more lots owned prior to July 20, 1986. {3) Building permits and final maps for projects identified in Section 2(F) of Ordinance No. 9791 {projects for _which construction had commenced and were designated on the map marked Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 9791 •as developing•). (4) Building permits for projects for which all required development permits were issued or approved on or befor January 21, 1986. If all required development permits were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall apply to that portion. · (5) Building permits for projects for which all required development permits were issued or aporoved before July 20, 1986 and for which building permits could have been issued under Ordinance No. 9791. If all required development permits were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall apply to that portion. (6) Commercial and industrial projects with approved development permits or with a co~plete aoplication on I file with the City prior to June 11, 1986 for such permits. New permits for commercial and industrial projects located within an 1 area that has been previously approved for such uses may also be 1 processed and approved. (7) Projects by nonprofit entities for structures and uses for youth recreational and guidance programs such as boys and airls clubs. -( 8) Zone changes or general plan amendments necessary to accomplish consistency between the general plan and zoning, to implement the provisions of the Local Coastal Plan or which the City Council finds will not increase the public facilities or services and which are initiated by the City Council or Planning Co~mission. (9) Public utility facilities and improve~ent projects without accommodations for permanent employees are exempt from the provisions of-this chapter unless the City Council determines they are of sufficient size and scale to impact public facilities. ( 10) "Adjustment plats. (11) Development permits for minor subdivisions located in the northwest auadrant of the City as defined in Ordinance No. 9791. Building permits for commercial or l I I i I industrial construction on lots in such subdivisions ~ay be approved. Residential building permits will not be aoorov~d for · lots in such subdivisions unless otherwise exempt under this 4. 126 I ' - I i 11 2 3 4 5 61 7 8 9 10 111 12I 1:sl 141 I I 15 ! 1s .I II 17 :i ' 21 ·: 22 I ,I i! 23' II 24 · ,, I ,I 2s-: 27 28 1: I chapter except one permit for a nonowner-occupied lot ~ay ~e approved for each such subdivision • . (d) The provisions of this subsection apply to final maps and other development permits for projects with a tentative map approved before July 20, 1986 which are not included in the exemptions listed in subsection (c). 1 . ~ l) If a tentative map or tentative parcel rr,_ap wad approved on or before January 21, 1986 then, after approval of 7 the citywide facilities plan, a final map or parcel mac ~ay be · processed and approved before the adoption of a local facilitv management plan. The expiration period for those tentative macs ; shall be tolled until the citywide plan is adopted. The · ' expiration of any development permits issued in conjunction with those maps shall be tolled until the applicable local facilities management plan is approved or, two years after the date the citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first. · (2) If a tentative map or tentative parcel map wa approved after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986, but th approval of final map or parcel map was prohibited by Ordinance No. 9791 then approval of final maps and parcel maps is prohibited until after preparation of the applicable local facilities management plan. The expiration period of those tentative maps and tentative parcel maps, and any other development permits issued in conjunction with the maps shall be tolled until the local facilities management plan is approved, or two years after date the citywide facilities and improvements. plan is approved, whichever occurs first. i (e) The exemption for projects listed in subsection (c~ (3), (4), (5), and (6) shall expire on July 20, 1-988. After that; date all development permits for those projects shall be fullv i subject to the provisions of this chapter. The exemptions for · projects listed in subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), and (6) shall 1 apply only so long as the facilities and improvements recuired as a condition to the issuance of final development permits have i been installed or are being installed pursuant to a secured agreen,ent. Any breach of such secured improvement agree~ent shall subject any remaining building pern,its for the project to the provisions of subsection (a). (f) Final or parcel maps for projects listed in subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) which comply with all the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and Title 20 of this Code which were filed with the City before July 20, 1986 ~ay be , approved by the City Council, or City Engineer as appropriate, after July 20, 1986. Upon approval, those projects shall be subject to the exemption of subsection (c). (g) The City Council may authorize the processinq cf and decision making on building permits and develop~ent per~its for a project with a master plan approved before July 20, 1986 subject to the following restrictions: , (1) The City Council finds that the facilities and improvements required by the master plan are sufficient to ~eet ! the needs created by the project and that the master plan i developer has agreed to install those facilities and i~croverr,ents· to the satisfaction of the City Council. 5. 127 4 5 6 7 10 11 ,I 121 l3i I ' l4!i l5 1i 1si! ii 17 ii I, 18.: ,, I' 19 1i 'I 21 22 I ;1 23ii I q 24 !1 ., ,, 25 :' . I I, 26 :: d I'. 27 i, 28 11 (2) The master plan developer shall agree in writing that all facilities and improvement requirements, including but not limited to the payment of fees established ~v the citywide facilities and manaqement plan and the applicable· local facilities management plan shall be applicable to development within the master plan area and that the master ~lan developer shall comply with those plans. CJ) The master plan establishes an educational park and all uses within the park comprise an integral part of the educational facility. ( 4.) Building pernii ts for the 129 unit residential portion of Phase I of the project may be approved provided the applicant has provided written evidence that an educational entity will occupy Phase I of the project which the City Council finds is satisfactory and consistent with the goals and intent o the approved master plan. (5) Prior to the approval of the final map for Phase I the master plan developer shall have agreed to participate in the restoration of a significant lagoon and • wetland resource area and made any dedications of property necessary to accomplish the restoration. (h) After making the findings in paragraph l the City Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on master plans subject to the reauirements of paragraph 2. After the grant of the easement required by subparagraph (h)(iv) the tentative map for Phase I of the project, the site plan for the commercial development and the local coastal plan amendment may also be processed and approved. If such approvals are granted and, subject to all other provisions of this code, grading and building permits for construction of the golf course and first phase of the commercial portions of the project may be processed l and approved. 1 The processing and approval of all other developments I and building permits within the master plan shall not occur unti~ after the citywide facilities plan and the local facilities management plan have been adopted by the City Council. (l)(i) That the master plan will provide all necessary public facilities for the project and will cure any facilities deficits in the area affected by the project. (ii) That the approval will not prejudice the ·,1 preparation of the citywide facilities plan and will improve the level of public facilities and services in the area. , (iii) That by the dedication of land and the construction of public improvements the project wilt make a . significant contribution to the public facilities needs of the city and provide for the preservation or enhancement of sianificant environmental resources. · (2)(i) The master plan shall include all of the information required by and implementing the provisions of Sections 21.90.090 and 21.90.110 for the area covered by the master plan. (ii) The applicant shall agree in writing that ali facilities and improvement reauirements, including but not limited to the payment of fees established by the citywide 6. 128 I I I 11 !I 2 :i :1 :5 4 'I 5 ii 611 I 7' I I 8:i 9 ii 10!! 11I I 121I I I' 1:5 i/ I 'I 14,; 'I 15 :i 16 ,! 17 f 18: 19 20 21 22 ,. 25i I 26 ii 2,7: 28 j, ii ii !I 11 facilities and improvement olan and the applicable local facilities management plan shall be applicable to develop~ent within the master plan area and that the master plan developer shall comply with those requirements. (iii) The master plan applicant shall agree to participate in the restoration of a significant laooon and wetland resource area. - (iv) Prior to any processing on the ~aster plan 1 the applicant shall grant an easement over the property necessaryj for the lagoon restoration and the right-of-way necessary for thel widening of La Costa Avenue and its intersection with El Camino I Real. I 21.90.031 Tolling of time for consideration of applications sub~itted before the effective date of this chapter. After approval of the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the applicable local facilities manaoement plan applications for development permits ·which were accepted as complete before the effective date of this chapter shall have processing priority in relationship to the acceptance date. Until the approval of the plans all aoplicable time li~its for processing the development permits shall be tolled. 21.90.032 Tolling of expiration of oreviously issued development permits. If a discretionary development permit, ot~er than a development permit issued in conjunction with a subdivision map, issued prior to July 20, 1986 has an expiration period within which building permits ~ust be issued and the issuance of buildinq permits for the project is prohibited by this chapter then the expiration period shall be tolled until the aoplicable local facilities management plan is approved, or two years after the date the citywide p~an is approved, whichever occurs first. 21.90.033 Extensions of orior a rovals orohibited. Ater approva of an app icable local facilities management plan an extension of the expiration date of any develop~ent permit shall not be granted unless the extension is found to be consistent with the plan. The decision makina body considering an extension may condition the extension upon compliaoce with the citywide plan and applicable local facilities management olan. I I I 21.90.040 Compliance with this chanter. (a) No develop~ent permit shall be approved unless approving authority finds that the permit is consistent with citywide facilities and improvements plan and the applicable local facilities management plan. To ensure consistency the approving authority ~ay impose any condition to the approval the; t~e I necessary to implement the plans. i (b) No building permit shall be issued unless the fees I reouired by this chapter, and any applicable local facilities · management plan fees are first paid, and the oermit is.consisten~ 7. 129 I I 121 I 13: 14 15't 16 i 17:1 18 19 20 21 22, ,I 23:; 25 with the applicable local facilities management plan. As a condition to the issuance of any building permit pursuant to Section 21.90.030(c) the applicant shall aqree to pay the appropriate fees within 30 days of the date each fee is established. (c) The reauirements of this chapter are imposed as a condition of zoning on the property to ensure implementation of ! and consistency with the general plan and to protect the public 1 health, safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities and improvements will be installed to serve new development prior to l or concurrently with need. I 21.90.050 Establishment of local facilities managewe~t I !!!.· I (a) A local facilities management fee is hereby ! established to pay for improvements or facilities identified in~ local facilities management plan which are related to new I development within the zone and are not otherwise financed by an other fee, charge or tax on development, or are not installed by a developer as a condition of a building permit or development permit. The fee may also be used to pay for that portion of the facilities or improvements identified in the citywide facilities and improvements plan attributed to develooment within the local zone which are not financed by other means. The facilities management fee shall be paid before the issuance of a building I permit. The amount of the fee shall be determined based upon th~ estimated cost of the facility or improvement designated as I necessary to accommodate additional development within the · applicable ~o7a; facili~ies manageme~t zo~e.plu~ the es~ima~ed I cost of fac1l1t1es and improvements 1cent1f1ed in the c1tyw1de , facilities and improvement plan attributable to the local zone. The fee shall be fairly apportioned among the new development. , (b) The fee required by this section is in addition toj any other means of finct .. cing facilities or improvements l identified by a local facilities management plan or any other i tax, fee, charge or improvement requirement which may be imposed i on the development of property under the provisions of state law~ this code or City Council policy. (c) The amount of the fee for a local facilities management zone shall be set by City Council resolution after a public hearing, published notice of which shall be given according to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.54.060(2) and Government Code Section 54992. (d) As a condition of any building or development permit application submitted after the effective date of this chapter the applicant shall agree to pay the fee established by 1 this section at the time a building permit is issued. . r Ce) The fee established by this section shall be levied at the time of issuance of a building permit. Special proyisions for building permits ,1 issued tem orar moratorium. (a Applicants for projects for which building permits: were issued after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986 shall e. 130 l: ! 2i i ,· I 3' 4 i 51 I I 101 111 I I 1sii 16 ,I 17 1! 18 ,, ,I 19 :, 20 ,I 21:: ,, 22 i 23;1 ,, I I 24 i; 'I ·I 25 1, !i 26 \i 27 :, .: ,, 28 •: I' I I ' . i I pay the fee established by Sect~on 21.90.050 within 30 days afteq the amount of the fee is determined by the City Council. Payment' shall be made according to the agreement executed by the 1 applicant pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9791. 21.90.070 Findin of health, safet and welfare necessar* or t e fees imposed by Sections 21. and 21.90.06 • (a) The City Council hereby declares that payment of the fee established and imposed by Sections 21.90.050 and 21.90.060 and installation of the facilities and improvements identified in a facilities management plan are necessary to achieve the policies established in Section 21.90.010 and to implement the City's general plan. If the fees are not paid or the facilities or improvements are not installed the public health, safety and welfare will suffer because there will be insufficient facilities and improvements to accommodate any new development. This finding is based upon City Council Policy No. 17, City Council Ordinance No. 9791, and the evidence presented at the public hearings on the ordinance adopting this chapter. I ! (b) If any condition imposed as a conditon of a development permit or building permit pursuant to this chapter i protested then the permit shall be suspended during the period o~ the protest. I (c) This section is adopted pursuant to Government Cod1 Section 65913.5. 21.90.080 Performance standard. The City Council shall adopt general performance standards for each facility or improvement listed in Section 21.90.090(b) or 21.90.ll0(c). Specific performance standards foi citywide facilities shall be adopted as part of the citywide ; facilities and improvement plan. Specific performance standards l for each zone shall be •oopted as part of the local facilities I management plan. If at any time after preparation of a local I facilities management plan the performance standards established I by a plan are not met then no development permits or building permits shall b~ issued within the local zone until the performance standard is met or arrangements satisfactory to the City Council guaranteeing the facilities and improvements have been made. ; 21.90.090 Cit wide facilities and im rovements lan. a To implement the C ty s general plan by securing provision of facilities and improvements, and to ensure that ! developroent does not occur unless facilities and improvements ar~ available the City Council shall adopt by resolution a citywide I facilities and improvements plan. The plan shall: Identify all! facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate the land l uses specified in the general plan and by the zoning; specify 1 size, capacity and service level performance standards for the ! identified facilities and improvements: establish specific ti~e I tables for acauisition, installation and operation of the facilities and improvements correlated to projected population 9. 131 l I 2 -i '1 'I 3 .1 j1 4:1 I 5 :i 6:1 I 71 I el! ii 91 1 II 10!! 11! 12 13 14 15 :i 16 .: 17 i 18. 19 20 21 22 24 'I 25 26 :: l .: 27: 28 :; 1: ' growth, facility and i~provement performance standards, and projected nonresidential development: identify the financing method or methods for each facility and improvement; and establish a facility and improvement budget for those facilities. or improvements which will be constructed or financed by the 1 - City. The plan shall encourage infill development and reduce the growth inducing impact of premature extension of facilities or i imorovements to undeveloped areas by establishing priorities for I: facility and improvement installation or financina. ( b) The citywide fac i 1 it ies and improvement plan shal 1 , show how and when the following facilities and improvements will be installed or financed as specified in subsection (c). (1) Major sewage transmission systems and sewage treatment plants: (2) Major water transmission lines: (3) Major area wide drainage facilities: (4) Prime and Major arterials; freeway interchanges, bridges or overcrossings; (5) Fire facilities: (6) Governmental administration facilities; (7) Par~s and other recreational facilities: ( 8) Libraries. (c) The plan shall include the following information with regard to each facility and improvement listed in subsectio11 ( b) : (1) An inventory of present and future requirements for each facility and improvement based upon the performance standard established for each facility and : improvement. Cost estimates shall be included. The inventory shal 1 be cons is tent with the general olan and zoning for the area. ( 2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing fot! installation or provisions of facilities or i~orovements in 1 relationship to the amo 1111t of development activity (e.g. number of dwelling units, nu~ber of sauare feet of commercial space within the service area of the facility or improvement) and the facility and improvement performance standards. 1 (3) A financing plan establishing various methods [ of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the plan. The plan shall identify those facilities and improvements which would otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing a devel9pment project (i.e. reauirements imposed as a condition of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order ta establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or i 21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements for whichi new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure I sufficient funds are available to construct or provide facilities or improvements when required by the phasing schedule. ! (d) The City Manager shall prepare and present the plarl to the City Council not later than one year from the effective date of this ordinance. 10. 132 ,, I 1 ;\ (e) Amendments to this citywide facilities and : improvements plan shall be initiated by action of the Planninc 'I Commission or City Council. 2: ?i I 'I 8': I 9 ii 1oi! 11!! •I 12 13 14, 15 I 16;: ! 17 I 18 19 20 21 22 24 ,[ 25, 26 :· 27: .21.90.100 Local facilities manaaement zones. (a) The City -Council shall divide the City into facilities management zones. (bl The boundaries of the zones shall be estahlished based upon logical facilities and improvements plannina, , construction and service relationships to ensure the economicall~ efficient and timely installation of required facilities and · improvements. In establishing zone boundaries the City Council shall also be guided by the following considerations: i (1) Service areas or drainage basins: i (2) Extent to which facilities or improvements ar~ in place or available: plan areas: (3) Ownership of property: (4) Aoundaries of existing zoning master plans: (5) Boundaries of pending zoning master plans: (6) Boundaries of potential future zoning master (7) Boundaries of approved tentative maps: (8) Public facilities relationships, especially the relationship to the City's planned major circulation network: (9) Special district service territories: (10) Approved fire, drainage, sewer, or other facilities or improvement master plans. (c) The zones shall be established by resolution after a public hearing notice of which is given pursuant to Section 21.54.060(2) of this code. 21.90.110 Contents of local facilit mana e~ent clar.s. a) A local fa,-::ilities management plan shall be prepared for each facility zone and shall cover the entire zone. i (b) The plan shall consist of maps, graphs, tables, an~ narrative text and shall be based upon the general plan and ; zoning applicable within the local zone at the time of plan approval. The local facilities m.anagement plan shall be , consistent with the citywide facilities and improvements plan and shall impiement the citywide facilities and improvements plan within the zone. · " (c) The facilities management plan shall show how and when the following facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate development within the zone will be installed or financed as specified in subsection (d). (1) Sewer systems ( 2) Water (3) Drainage (4) Circulation ( 5) Fire facilities (6) Schools (7) Parks and other recreational facilities ( 8) Open space 11. 133 ii ,1 211 3 I 4' I I 5 ii I 6 7 8 I' I 9i I I 10! 1111 12 :1 13:1 '1 16 .l ' 17 ! 18 :' 19' 20 21 22 23 !! 24 :: ·I ,, 25: (d) The plan shall be consistent with and implement t~e citywide facilities management plan and general plan and shall include the following information with regard to each facility 1 and improvement listed in subsection (cl: (1) An inventory of present and future requirements for each facility and improvement based upon the performance standard established for each facility. Because improvement reauirements for certain facilities and improvements may overlap zone boundaries a discussion of the need for coordination and a proposed coordination plan for facilities extending from one zone to another shall be included. Cost estimates shall be included. It must be shown that development in the zone will not reduce the facilities or improvements capabilities or create facilities or improvements shortages in other zones or reduce service capability in any zone below the performance standard which is established pursuant to Section 21.90.080. The growth inducing impac·t of the out of zone improvements shall be assessed. (2) A phasing schedule establishing the ti~ing for installation or provisions of facilities or improvements in relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number of dwelling units, number of square feet of commercial space, etc.) for the facilities management zone. The phasing schedule shall ensure that development of one area of the zone will not utilize more than the area's prorata share of facility or improvement capacity within that zone unless sufficient capacity is ensured for other areas of the zone at the time of the first development. The phasing schedule shall include a schedule of development within the zone and a market data and cash flow analysis for financing of facilities and improvements for the zone. The phasing schedule shall identify periods where the demand for facilities and improvements may exceed the capacity and provide a plan for eliminating the shortfall. In those situations when demand ~xceeds capacity and it is not feasible to increase the capacity prior to development, no development shall: occur unless a time schedule for and a means of increasing the I capacity is established in the ?lan. 1 (3) A financing plan establishing various methods I of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the plan fairly allocating the cost to the various properties within the I zone. The plan shall identify those facilities and ll'lprovements ! which w9uld otherwise be provided as a requirement of processing i a development project (i.e. requirements imposed as a condition of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order ta establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or I 21 of this Code, and those facilities and i~provements for which! new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure I sufficient funds are available to construct or provide , ·facilities or improvements when required by the phasing schedule~ Where facilities or improvements are reauired for more than one 1 zone, the phasing plan shall identify those other zones and the i plan for each zone shall be coordinated. Coordination, however, I shall not require identical funding methods. · 12. 134 :I 1! I 21 3; 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 I 12 13 1411 15! i 16, i . 19 20 21 22.·: 23 24 25 26 27 28 :; ' I, {4) A list or schedule of facilities reauirements correlated to individual development projects within the zone. (e) The local facilities management plan shall establish the proportionate share of the cost of facilities and improvements identified in the citywide facilities and improvement plan attributable to develop~ent of property on the local facilities management zone. 21.90.120 Local facilities management olan preparation. (a) A local facilities management plan may be preoared by the City or by the property owners within the zone accordina to the procedures established by this section. (b) The City Council, upon its own initiative, may bv resolution direct the City Manager to prepare a facilities · management plan for any zone. The City Council may assess the cost of preparing the plan to the owners within the zone after a hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the ~ropert owners within the zone. The cost shall be spread prorata according to acreage and development potential. (c) All owners within the zone may jointly submit a facilities management plan. (d) For zones in which joint submission of a facilitie management plan is shown to be not feasible any owner or group o cooperating owners within the zone may petition the City Council to allow the owner or group of owners to prepare the plan. Afte a meeting for which ten days prior written notice has been given to the property owners within the zone, the City Council may , .permit the owner or group of owners to prepare and submit the I plan. A limit based on the estimated cost of the plan shall be 1 deterfflined at the time of the hearing. The actual cost shall be/ determined when the plan is adopted and shall be assessed ~rorata based on acreage and development potential to property within the facilities management zone. The assessment shall be collected by the City at the time any application for a development project ! within the zone is submitted. The owner or owners who prepared 1 the plan shall be reimbursed for the cost of the plan less the : owner's or owners' prorata share. No reimbursement shall be made unless the plan is approved. Cost of preparation shall not ' include interest. · (e) As an option to preparation by the owner or grou9 of owners as provided in subsection (d) the City Council may decide to direct the City Manager to prepare the facilities management plan. The cost of preparation shall be advanced to the City by the requesting owner or owners, assessed to all t~e owners and reimbursed as provided in subsection (d). 21.90.125 Facilities mana· ement lan orocessina. a Fac1l1t1es management pans shall be reviewed according to the following procedure: (1) A completed facilities management ~lan complying with this chapter, and accompanied by a processing fee; in an amount established by City Council resolution, ~ay be submitted to the Planning Director for processing. !f the 13. 135 Q C CII I .,, ~-~ C at -U w C g "" i i Z Ow 0 ,. > 0 ai ':: C ~ U2~ .... ~ u i-> "' -z.., Q w Z ~ C U ~ _ CII ~ t: '.1 > iz: C C ,. . u .. iJ i ii I 21 I I 3. 4 5 6 7 al 9 10 11! I 121 131 14:: Ii 15 :i :\ 16 ,: 17 :1 18il 19 I, ,, 20' 21: 22, II 23,; Ii 2411 25 ii 26" 27 28 :; d ;: I: Planning Director determines that the plan complies with the provisions of Section 21.90.110 the director shall set a facilities management plan for public hearing before tr.e Planni~qi Commission within sixty days of receipt of a complete 1 application. (2) The hearing shall be noticed according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). A staff report containina recommendation on the plan shall be prepared and furnished to -t!"lel public, the applicant, and the Planning Commission prior to the I hearing. (3) The Planning Commission shall hear and consider the application for a facilities manage~ent plan and shall by resolution prepare recommendations and findinqs for the City Council. The action of the Commission shall be filed with the City Clerk, and a copy shall be mailed to the owners within the facility zone. . (4) When the Planning Commission action is filed with the City Clerk, the Clerk shall set the matter for public hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be noticed according to th.e provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). ( 5) The City Council shall hear the matter, .and after considering the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, may approve, conditionally approve or deny facilities management plan. The City Council may include in the resolution adopting the facilities management plan any fees or facilities improvement requirements which it deeffls necessary to impose on development projects within the zone in order to implement the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the local facilities management plan. (b) A facilities management plan may be amended following the same procedures for the original adoption. i (c) A local facilities management plan shall be : considered a project for the purposes of Title 19 of this Code. I Environmental documents snould be processed concurrently with th~ plan. i i 21.90.130 Implementation of facilities and imcrove~ents reauirements. (a) To ensure that the provisions of this chaoter and , the general plan are met the following shall apply: I (1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter nd development permit shall be approved unless the map or i:,e rm it is · consistent with the local facilities management plan and unless provision for all facilities and improvements related to the development project are provided or funded. (2) No building.permit shall be issued unless all applicable fees, including but not limited to, public facilities fees, bridge and thoroughfare fees, traffic impact fees, facilities management fees, school fees, park-in-lieu fees, sewer fees, water fees, or other development fees identified in the · citywide facilities and improvements plan and local facilities management plan and adopted by the City Council have first ~een paid or provision for their payment has been made to the satisfaction of the City Council. 14. 136 i 11 I i 2: I I 3' 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 Q C m I 131 en if. 9; C . U 1M C 14 g II,,~ i z0~~ 0>>0 15 -"" Cw. Ill G 2 i II,, • ... u ~ >, "" -16;1 z "' I a 11,1 z i r.J ! -,1 3i .. '1 11il >.. ~ C C ,. <J .. G 1s,: 19 ;1 1, 20'! ,, 21!: 22 i 1! 231i I 24 ~I 25 11 26 :; 27 28 !: 11 1· 1, 'i 'I (b) The citywide facilities and improvement plan and the local facility management plan process is part of the Citv's ongoing planning effort. It is anttcipated that amend~ents to the-plans may be necessary. Adoption of a facilities management plan does not establish any entitlement or right to any particular general plan or zoning designation or any particular development proposal. The citywide facilities and improvements plan and the local facilities management plans are guides to ensure that no development occurs unless adequate facilities or improvements will be available to meet demands created by development. The City Council may initiate an amendment to any of the plans at any time if in its discretion it determines that an amendment is necessary to ensure adeauate facilities and improvements. (c) If at any ti~e it appears to the satisfaction of the City Manager that facilities or ~provements within a facilities management zone or zones are inadequate to accommodate any further develop~ent within that zone or that the performance standards adopted pursuant to Section 21.90.100 are not being met he shall immediately reoort the deficiency to the Council. If the Council determines that a deficiency exists then no further building or development permits shall be issued within the affected zone or zones and development shall cease until an amendment to the citywide facilities and ~provements plan or applicable local facilities management plan which addresses the deficiency is approved by the City Council and the perfornance standard is met • (d) The Planning Director shall monitor the developmen activity for each local facilities management zone and shall prepare an annual report to the City Council consisting of maps, graphs, charts, tables and text and which includes a develop~ental activity analysis, a facilities and improvements adequacy analysis, a facility revenue/expenditure analysis and reco~mendation for any amendments to the facilities management plan. The co~tent of the annual report shall be established by the City Council. (e) The City Council shall annually review the citywid1 facilities and improvements plan at the time it considers the City's capital improvement budget. , 21.90.140 Obligation to pay fees or install I improvements reauired by any other law. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as relieving a builder, developer or subdivider from any public improvement requirement, dedication reauirement or fee requirement which is imposed pursuant to Titles 13, 18, 20 or 21 of this code or pursuant to any City Council policy. 21.90.150 Implementina guidelines. The City Council may adopt any guidelines it deems necessary to implement this chapter. 21.90.160 Exclusions. {a) Development proposals which consist of facilities,. 15. 137 I 51 6 7 I I 8!1 9!1 1011 11 12i 1311 14:: 'I 15 11 I 16 ii I II 17 ii I, 19 1 20 21 22 I II 231: ', 27 :; 28 :1 ii I' ii 11 !1 or structures constructed by a city, county, special district, state, or federal government or any agency, department, or subsidiary thereof for governmental purposes are excluded from the provisions of this chapter. This exclusion shall not aoolv to development proposals to which a possessory interest tax-~oulc' be applicable. j (b) Tentative maps the application for which was accepted before August 6, 1985 ~ay be approved without complyina with the plans adopted pursuant to this Chapter but any other · development permits or building permits for the project shall be subject to the reauirements of the plans. The tentative map shall be subject to Section 21.90.030. 21.90.170 Council actions, fees, notice. (a} Whenever this chapter requires or permits an action or decision of the City Council, that action or decision shall be accomplished by a resolution. (b) The City Council shall establish aoolication and processing fees for the submission and processin~-of facilities management plans and for any other request made under Section 21.90.100, 21.90.120 or 21.90.140. (c} Whenever written notice is required to be given to property owners under this section the notice shall be mailed by first class mail to the owners shown on the last equalized assessment roll. 21.90.180 Expiration of chapter. This chapter shall expire on June 30, 2001 unless. it is extended or reenacted on or before that date. 21.90.190 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of the ordinance codified in this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any rourt of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance codified in this chapter. The City Council 1 declares that it would have passed the ordinance codified in this chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any part thereof be ' declared invalid or unconstitutional. ~ SECTION 2: The City Council makes the following findings: 1. Since January 1985, the City of Carlsbad has been , undertaking a comprehensive review of the Land Use Element of its General Plan. As part of that review a Council appointed \ Citizens Committee prepared a comprehensive report and i recommendation to the City Council. That report was subject to : public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council. Included in the recommendations of the Citizens Committee were recommendations that no new development should occur unless 16. 138 3J ii 4:1 ,I 5 ii 6 11 7:i .. a:1 9:1 1oll nJI 12:I ii 13i! ! 14:i 15'1 16 :: ,I ., 17 ii 18 1 19 20, 21 22 I 24 ': ,, 25 :, !, 2s !I I, 27 :. 28 ii ii II II ii adequate public facilities are available concurrently with need to serve the new development. 2. On August 6, 1985, the City Council adopted Interi~ Ordinance No. 9766, imposing certain temporary land use controls on property within the City, consistent with the recommendation of the Citizens Committee. On September 3, 1985, the City Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 9771 which extended the restrictions of Ordinance No. 9766 until July 20, 1986. On December 10, 1985, the City Council approved in concept several land use proposals not contained in the Citizens Committee report. On January 21, 1986 the City Council adopted Urgency ! Ordinance No. 9791 imposing a temporary moratorium on develop~entj approvals based on the findings contained in that ordinance. On I April 22, 1986 the City Council revised City Council Policy No. i 17, based on the findings contained therein. On May 6, 1986 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8107 establishing a traffic impact fee for the La Costa Area of the City. The City Council finds that all of these actions plus the adoption of Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code are necessary to ensure adequate public facilities are available to serve any new development in the City. Without Chapter 21.90 and the requirements imposed by it, adeauate public facilities may not b available to serve new development or building. Development or building without public facilities is contrary to the City General Plan and would be dangerous to the public health and safety. 3. This action of the City Council is consistent with long standing policies and objectives of the City to ensure adequate public facilities within Carlsbad. This action will i protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of! Carlsbad by ensuring safe streets, adequate water, sewer and ! drainage facilities, su~~icient fire protection and recreation i facilities. ' to I I 4. This action is consistent with the City's policy provide housing opportunities for all economic sectors of the community, because sufficient opportunities for new housing continue to exist within the City and Chapter 21.90 does not affect the number of houses which may be built. In addition, develop~ent of housing for low and moderate income persons and families would most likely occur in areas of the City which are , designated for highest development priority. By encouraging 1 development of infill areas first, where the infrastructure is 1 already existing, the cost of housing may be reduced. i I s. Because any new development affects public facility! availability it is necessary to impose the fees and charges whic~ will be used to provide public facilities on any new building ini the City. The Council finds that failure to impose the fees and! charges on any new building in the City will adversely affect the public health and safety by reducing the safety of its City's st~eets, increasing the burden on water, sewer, drainage and fit"e 17. 139 1 2 31 4\i 'I ·I 5 ij I 6; 11 :1 a,: !I ,, 9 :1 1011 111I l1 12!1 C ii C m I 13 11 II> ... = = ~c ell • '"""' C 14 g 'z z '! 0 , .,,. 15 ii cij':C'= u 2 :t ... .. u ,_ ► l,,M • 16 ,! Z,... ~ C ,...z ~ u ~ -~... ~ 17 ·i > ... = C C ► CJ ... u 18: 19 20 21 22. :' 23. 24 I 25 ·; 26 :; I ., 27 ,. 28 ·: !; ,. '! ,, I facilities, and by overcrowding existing schools, parks and recreational facilities. 6. Adoption of Chapter 21.90 will not adversely affect the regional welfare. By ensuring that adeauate and safe ~ublic facilities and improvements will exist to serve all of the development in Carlsbad and because many of these facilities and improvements are used by persons residing in neighborina areas and cities the safety and welfare of the whole region is enhanced. SECTION 3: The City Council intends to implement the growth management program contained in Chapter 21. 90 by followi~~I I the work program in Exhibit A which is hereby made a part of this ordinance. The City Council may adjust the work program without amending this ordinance as they determine necessary to accomplis effective growth management for the City of Carlsbad. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published a least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its I I I adoption. The fees created by Section 21.90.050 of this , I I ordinance shall be effec::ive as to building permits for single o~ I multifamily residential projects 60 days after the adoption of this ordinance. INTRODUCED ANO FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the Carlsbad City Council held on the ,, 1986 and thereafter 18. 140 24th day of June 11 -------- ,1 1: 2! 811 ,, 9:1 1011 / I 111 i I 121 I 13! ' 14ii ' 16d ,I 11 ii 1a1: 19' 20" 21.: 22: ii 23;1 24 25 26 27 28 ,1 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 1st day of __ J_u_l_v ____ , 1986, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Peccine NOES: ~one ABSENT: ~one APPPOVED AS V ATTEST: ~ ALETHA LEGALITY City Attorney 19. 141 Mayor r -~--· .... . .. _a,.••..,.,. -• ,"'\ CUL8BAD Ciff COU■CIL Gaorra JIA■AGBNB■T PLA■ ~■ana9in9 a aeapoaaible aa4 Pr09reaai•• Carlabad Putare• WOU PLAII I. Citywide Pacilities and Improvement Plan A. Grow·th Control Mapping and Planning Systems 1. The General Plan will be utilized as the overal~ base map with a maximum residential utilization i.e. mean den~ity. 2. A citywide map will show all current and future public facilities and improvements. Each public facility and improvement will also be shown separately on a citywide map. 3. A citywide environmental constraints and open space map will be prepared. 4. These maps will also be broken down into quadrants to show greater area detail. ·a. Management Performance Standards t. Establish overall performance or adequacy standards for each public facility and improvement. 2. Establish thresholds for each public facility and improvement. c. Citywide Pinancing Options 1. PinaAcin9 options will be identified for each facility and improvement. 2. ~Bud9etin9 for citywide public facility and improvement will be in conjunction with the City's five year capital improvement budget. o. Citywide Plan 1. A Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan will be prepared using growth control maps, performance standards and financing options. -1- 142 E. Development of Local Facility Management and Planning Zones. 1. The City shall be divided into 25 specific zones. 2. The size of each zone ■hall depend upon major circulation roads, lagoons, property ownership boundaries, and other identifiable characteristics. 3. The purpose of zone ■a a. Requires landowners to work together in order to pre ■ent development plan■ in accordance with the City's Growth Management Program. b. Requires landowners to provide development ~lans which adhere to the citywide facilities plan and to relate development to adjacent zones. c. Zones allow for greater citizen review prior to development approval. 4. Each zone will have a maximum residential utilization i.e. mean density. Specific densities for individual development plan• within the zone, however, will be contro~led through the normal planning process. s. Each zone must conform to the General Plan and the Growth Management Ordinance. II. Facility Management Zone Processing A. Landowners submit local facilities management plans for processing concurrently with normal environmental analysis. a. Local facilities management plans shall conform to all standard• of the Growth control Mapping and Planning systems and other existing City standards. c. The local plan shall provide a detailed financing plan to assure adequate funding of all citywide facilities and improvements identified in the citywide plan. The local plan shall also provide a detailed financial plan for all public facilities and improvements located within the local facilities management zone. All development within th• local facilities management zone will be phased in accordance with the facility and improvement performance standards. D. A public hearing on the local facilities management plan and environmental analysis will be held concurrently. Notice to all landowners within the zone as well as surrounding adjacent zone landowners. -2- 143 E. After the public hearing is completed on the local facilities management zone and environmental analysi.s, then the specific development plans will be processed in the normal method. P. Each local facilitie■ management plan will be reviewed annually by the City to ensure that all performance standards are being met. If they are not, development will be stopped. 6/13/86 ad -3- 144 APPENDIX 3 145 - REFERENCE SOURCES 1. Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, City of Carlsbad, Revised September 29, 1986 2. Master Drainage Plan for the City of Carlsbad, adopted June, 1980 3. Sewer Master Plan, City of Carlsbad November, 1976 June, 1984 April, 1985 4. Costa Real Municipal Water District Master Plan, February, 1985 5. Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan, City of Carlsbad, June, 1982 6. Memo to Planning Commission from Parks and Recreation Director, dated March 26, 1987 7. Circulation Element of the General Plan, City of Carlsbad 8. Standard Design Criteria for the Design of Public Works Improvements in the City of Carlsbad, 1984 9. Draft Barton-Aschman Traffic Study, March, 1987 10. Capital Improvement Program Budget, 1986-1987 11. Capital Improvement Program, 1987-1991 146 APPENDIX 4 147 ZONE 2 ACREAGE SUMMARY ========================================================================== GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION RESIDENTIAL: RL Low Density (0-1.5) RLM Low-Med Density (0-4) RM Medium Density (4-8) RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15) RH High Density (15-23) COMMERCIAL: CBD Central Bus. District c Community N Neighborhood RC Recreation TS Travel Services o Professional & Related RRE Extensive Reg'l Retail RRI Intensive Reg'l Retail RS Regional Service INDUSTRIAL: PI Planned Industrial OTHER: E J H HC p G u NRR OS RR FW MAJ MIN COL Elementary School Junior High School High School Continuation School Private School Governmental Facility Public Utilities Non-Resid'l Reserve Open Space Railroad Freeway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Collector Street GROSS 525.9 135.3 --------661.2 24.3 10.2 34.5 o.o 13.4 58.3 22.3 19.9 113.9 100% 25%-40% CONSTRAINED SLOPE 30.3 32.6 -------62.9 1.0 o.o 1.0 o.o 1.8 19.1 22.3 19.9 63.l 5.3 11.1 -------16.4 NET 493.0 97.2 590.l 23.3 10.2 33.5 o.o 11.6 39.2 o.o o.o 50.8 ========================================================================== TOTAL 809.6 127.0 16.4 674.4 ====-===================================================================== ASSUMPTIONS: l) 100% constrained acres include Riparian areas, transmission line easements, slopes greater than 40%, and major roadways. 2) Residential: Net acres -as~umes City council adopts Hillside Ord. (Net= Gross -100% Constrained -1/2 of 25-40% Slope). 3) Non-Residential: Net acres= Gross acres -100% Constrained. 148 APPENDIX 5 149 ZONE 2 -BUILDOUT ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS This appendix lists and maps the improvements that will be needed to completely develop all Circulation Element roads in Zone 2 to their ultimate right-of-way width. The following roads serve as boundaries between Zone 2 and other zones. El Camino Real -Zones 2 and 1 Tamarack Avenue -Zones 2 and 14 Elm Avenue -Zones 2 and 7 For purposes of this study these roads have been split down the middle when assigning development requirements to a particular zone. For example, half the cost of providing the median on El Camino Real between Chestnut Avenue and Tamarack Avenue has been assigned to. Zone .2 and half has been assigned to Zone 1. This is not to suggest that only half the median be constructed at any one time. When this improvement is constructed it would be logical as well as economical to construct the entire median at one time. Some of the needed improvements will be constructed by the developers of adjacent property. Other needed improvements are adjacent to properties that have little or no development potential or have already been developed with single family homes, none of which gain access from El Camino Real. Alternatives for financing these improvements are shown at the end of this section. All of the Circulation Element to their full length within Zone 2. have sections that have not been right-of-way width. Roads have been constructed However, all of these roads built out to their ultimate Each of the arterials within Zone 2 has been broken into segments, as shown on map "Existing and Proposed Street Improvements", on Page 153. This exhibit distinguishes between fully improved and partially improved segments of the roads. Partially improved segments have been assigned a letter. Underneath this letter ls a series of numbers and letters which list the needed improvements on each unimproved section. The legend on this exhibit ·explains what each of these letters signifies. The needed improvements, the approximate length of the needed improvements, the approximate cost of the improvements and the source of the improvements is shown on Table 6, "Needed Arterial Improvements" on Page 152. This information was obtained from a number of sources. A field survey was done by staff to determine 150 what improvements were needed on each partially improved segment. The approximate length of the needed improvements was determined by the use of maps, recent aerial photos, or actually measuring the length of the needed improvements in the field. None of the needed arterial improvements within Zone 2 are included in any existing assessment district. The cost for these improvements given in this section are only approximations. They were obtained by estimating an approximate cost estimate per linear foot for various portions of a Circulation Element roadway. It should be noted that all of the estimated costs for the needed improvements are based on 1987 costs. Future inflation rates could substantially increase the cost of these improve- ments. In addition, unforseen soils problems necessitating excessive amounts of grading could substantially increase the cost of the needed improvements. This is especially so for sections that need excessive amounts of grad~ng or remedial improvements since no detailed engineering studies have been completed for these areas. Financing Alternatives The City has several options for financing the improvements along the segments for which no clear funding source has been identified: 1. Add them to the list of projects which will be funded through Public Facilities Fees. 2. Require future development within Zone 2 and outside Zone 2 which contributes traffic to these segments to fund part or all of the cost of the needed improvements. 3. Establish Assessment Districts to pay for the needed improvements. 4. Establish traffic impact fees for all projects contributing traffic to the impacted road sections or intersections. 151 TABLE 6 ZONE 2 NEEDED ARTERIAL IMPROVEMENTS (A) Marron Road (east of commercial area adjacent to El Camino Real) 2 lanes, bike lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlight, street tree for approximately 700 feet on north side. Approximate cost $100,595. Source -Future development of property. (B) Elm Avenue (east of El Camino Real) -2 lanes, bike lane, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlight, street trees for approximately 1,056 feet on south side. (Massive grading required.) Approximate cost $172,101. Source -Future development of the property. (C) Tamarack Avenue (east of El Camino Real) -sidewalk for approximately 200 feet on north side. Approximate cost $3,000. Source -See Alternatives. (D) El Camino Real (from Elm Avenue to approximately 1,200 feet to the south) -street lights, sidewalk, street trees for approximately 1,200 feet on east side. Approximate cost $37,125. Source -Future development of the property. (E) El Camino Real (1,200 feet -south of Elm Avenue to 1,900 feet south of Elm Avenue) street trees for approximately 700 feet on the east side. Approximate cost $1,485. Source -See Alternatives. (F) El Camino Real (1,900 feet south of Elm Avenue to Chestnut Avenue) sidewalk, street lights, street trees for approximately 1,000 feet on east side. Approximate cost $30,442. Source -See Alternatives. (G) El Camino Real (Chestnut Avenue to approximately 600 feet to the south) half median. Approximate cost $37,950. Source -See Alternatives. (H) El Camino Real (approximately 600 feet south of Chestnut for approximately 600 feet on the east side) -lane, half median, sidewalk, curb and gutter, street light, street tree. Approximate cost $92,647. Source -Future development of property. (I) El Camino Real (approximately 1,200 feet south of Chestnut to Tamarack Avenue on the east side) -half median, street trees for approxim~tely 3,600 feet. Note: Improvements will have to be made to the unlined open drainage channel adjacent to the sidewalk along this section, it eventually will undermine the sidewalk. Approximate cost $235,125. Source -See Alternatives. 152 (A) !:',JsL, ~ ....... .. ZONE 1 (Dl 8, ST, IL on out old• ZONE 2 (F) S, SL, ST on •••• aide (H) L, 1/1 M, I, CG, SL, ST on ·••1 ..... (■) 2L, ■L, I, ( CG,IL, ~ IT on eouth I' CIRCULATION ELEMEN7 ZONE te 1ld1 (I) 1/2 M, ST on ... , 1ld1 0 FULLY IMPROVED ROADWAYS 0 PARTIALLY IMPROVED ROADWAYS N••d•d lmp,ovem•nts Q PFF TRAFFIC SIGNAL L-LA NE BL-BIKE LANE M-MEDIAN CG-CURB & GUTTER S-SIDEWALK SL-STREET LIGHT ST-STREET T.REE ZONE 7 I I I I I I I CH, ol C•l•boll Growlfl M1n1a•m-"f Pro••"' JANUARY 188 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN 153 APPENDIX 6 154 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 City of ·PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2665 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL .FA-CILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 2 ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 78, NORTH OF TAMARACK AVENUE, EAST OF EL CAMINO REAL GENERALLY TO ELM AVENUE. APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -ZONE 2 WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797 9 adopting the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan establishing 10 11 12 13 14 15 facility and requiring and zones and performance standards for public facilities, WHEREAS, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 9808 the processing of a Local Facilities Management Plan, WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9808 requires the Planning 16 Commission to hold a public hearing to consider the application for l? a Local Facilities Plan and shall make recommendations and findings 18 for the City Council; and 19 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 20th day of 20 May, 1987, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law 21 22 23 24 25 26 to consider said request; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning 2? Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows: 28 -155- 1 A) 2 B) 3 That the above recitations are true and correct. That based on.the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission APPROVES Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 2, based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions: · 4 Findings: 5 1) 6 7 8 2) 9 10 11 12 3) 13 4 > 14 15 5 ) 16 17 6 ) 18 That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2 ls consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities Element, and the other Elements contained in Carlsbad's General Plan. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2 is consistent with Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management), and with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. That the Local Facilities Management Plan and the conditions contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities will be provided in conformance with the adopted perfocmance standards. The Local Facilities Management Plan will control the timing and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to the provision of public facilities and improvements. The Plan will prevent growth unless public facilities and services are available in conformance with the adopted performance standards. This Plan will not cause any significant environmental impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the Planning Director on May 8, 1987 and approved by the Planning Commission on Hay 20, 1987. 19 I Conditions: 20 21 22 1) 23 I I I I 24 / / / / 25 /II I 26 / / / / Approval ls granted for Local Facilities Management Plan - Zone 2 as contained in the Plan titled Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 2, dated May 20, 1987, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by reference. 27 / / / / ' PC RESO NO. 2665 -2- 28 -156- 1 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 2 Planning Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on 3 the 20th day of May, 1987, by the following vote, to wit: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AYES: Chairman Marcus, Commissioners Schlehuber, Hall, Schramm, Holmes. NOES: Commissioners Mcfadden and McBane. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. CUS, Chairman 0 PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: /JA&l~, MI CHAEL.J.LZMiER PLANNING DIRECTOR PC RESO NO. 2665 -3- -157- l. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ·17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION ~O. 9123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 2. WHEREAS, a Local Facilities Management Plan has been prepared for Local Facilities Management Zone 2 in accordance with Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on May 20, 1987 hold a duly noticed public hearing as required by law to consider said plan and at the conclusion of the hearing adopted Resolution No. 2665 making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt a plan; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was issued by the:Plannlng Director on May 8, 1987 indicating that the Local Facilities Management Plan ls not anticipated to have any significant adverse impact on the environment; and WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of June 16, 1987held a duly noticed public hearing and considered all testimony and arguments of anyone desiring to be heard, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California as follows: . 1 • That the above recitations are true and correct. 2. That the findings of the Planning Commission in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2665 constitute the findings of the City Council. 3. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 2 dated May 20, 1987 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated -158- 1 herein by reference ls hereby approved. Any development occurlng 2 within the boundaries of Zone 2 shall comply with all the terms 3 and conditions of said plan. 4 PASSED, APPROVED ANO ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the 5 Carlsbad· City Council held on the 16th . day of June 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1987 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson t~OES: None ABSENT: None CLAUDE Mayor ATTEST: Clerk (SEAL) 2. -159- , , ...