HomeMy WebLinkAboutLFMP 03; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 03; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 3; 1987-03-04Number
1
2
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 3
City Council Resolution No. 9084
Dated May 19, 1987
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2650
Dated April 15, 1987
AMENDMENTS
Date Reso. Mo. Subfect(s)
Boundary adjustment
8/14/87 CC/9185 Country expansion.
for
12/15/87 CC/9326 Car Country expansion.
Car
0 UJ > 0 a::
0.. ~
z 0 ~ ... u z ::> 8
AMENDMENT # 1
CIT. )F CARLSBAD -AGEND/ 11LL 4 pages
I I"' AB# 9//Y
MTG. 8/4/87
DEPT. PLN
TITLE: ZONE 3 BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT
FOR CAR COUNTRY EXPANSION DEPT-~
CITY A ~ .
CITY MGR.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
ADOPT Resolution No. 9//S-adjusting the boundary of Local
Facilities Management Zone 3 to incorporate an area for the
expansion of Car Country.
ITEM EXPLANATION
The expansion of Car Country to the east on the Carltas (Ecke)
property has been discussed at length for some time. Two major
requirements have kept the expansion from proceeding forward: 1)
The area planned for expansion was in a Williamson Act
Agricultural Preserve; and 2) In order to develop the Carltas
property, the Local Coastal Program (LCP) required a Master Plan
which would place an agricultural restriction on all the property
not subject to development. Last year the State Assembly passed
a bill which would allow the Car Country expansion in exchange
for placing an equal amount of alternative land in a Williamson
Act Preserve. In addition, the Ecke's have prepared a Master
Plan which places an agricultural restriction over all of their
property, after expansion of Car Country, except for
approximately 90 acres per the requirements ~f the Carlsbad LCP.
Now that these two requirements have been addressed, the Carltas
Company is anxious to move forward on the expansion of Car
Country. In order to expedite the process, it ls necessary for
the City to amend the boundaries of Local Facilities Management
Zone 3. The Car Country expansion area is currently located in
Zone 13 which ls just in the preliminary stages of preparing a
Local Facilities Management Plan.
The boundary of Zone 3 was approved by the City Council on
September 23, 1986. Had there been more active interest and
progress on the Car Country expansion at that time, staff would
have proposed that the expansion area be included in Zone 3 for
the following reasons:
1) Development of the expansion area would use the same
facilities as existing Car Country particularly with
respect to access and circulation;
2) Existing Car Country is covered by a Specific Plan (SP-
19) which provides the development standards for the
automotive park. Any expansion of Car Country would
require incorporation into the existing Specific Plan.
For these reasons, staff would support an adjustment of the
boundaries of Zone 3 to include the Car Country expansion area as
shown on the attached Zone Boundary Adjustment Map, Exhibit "A".
-1-
Page Two of Agenda Bill No.
It should be pointed out that if the City Council approves the
boundary change for Zone 3, the Carltas Co. would be responsible
for processing an amendment to the Local Facilities Management
Plan for Zone 3 which has already been approved by the City
Council on Hay 19, 1987. The amendment to the Local Facilities
Management Plan could be processed concurrently with the other
applications which would have to be approved in order to permit
the Car Country expansion. These other applications include a
General Plan amendment, a zone change, a specific plan amendment
a tract map, LCP implementation action, and approval of the
Williamson Act Preserve Exchange.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
None required at this time.
FISCAL IMPACT
None. The Carltas Co. will be responsible for all expenses
associated with the processing of any applications necessary to
permit the Car Country expansion.
EXHIBITS
1) City Council Res·olution No. ?a.1 2) Zone Boundary Adjustment Map -Exhibit II A. II
3 ) lone 3 Location Map -Exhibit II B II
4) Preliminary Concept Plan for Car Country Expansion -Exhibit
"C"
-2-
1
2
3
4
5.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1:5
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 9185
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN ADJUSTMENT TO THE
BOUNDARY OF LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 3.
The Clty Council of the City of Carlsbad, California does
hereby resolve as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
That the boundary of Local Facilities Management Zone 3 was
originally approved on September 23, 1986.
That in order to allow and expedite the processing of a plan
to expand Car Country, it is necessary to approve an
adjustment to the boundary of Zone 3 to include within the
boundaries of the zone the Car Country expansion area.
That from a facilitle~ planning and development standpoint, it
is logical to have the expansion area included in the same
Local Facilities Management Zone as existing Car Country.
That the City Council hereby approves an amendment to the
boundary of Zone 3 to incorporate the Car Country expansion
area. Said amendment is shown on the attached Zone Boundary
Adjustment Map labeled Exhibit "A".
PASSED, APPROVED ANO ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Carlsbad held the 4th day of
__ A_u_g~u_s_t ___ , 1987 by the following vote, to wit:
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
CLAUDE A. LEWIS, Mayor
-3-
..... 11
l -,
I -I
I -I
I -I .
I .
1
' -I -I -I -I
I -\ .
N
0 ~ -I
I .
•-I -·-... ,.,
-ll-
I
I
I
I -I
I .
I
I
I -I
I •• ••••• '\ •• I ., -
BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT
MAP
Area to be
added to ZONE 3
(Approx 3 5 acres)
iJ
-..... ! ~ ! .... ,, 1
I "' .
-' ....... . I
N EXHIBIT A
i
.. z 0
fi ,c _. u z ::)
0 (,)
AMENDMENT # 2
· 10 p!Sf'~ ..
Sw.,,~1r,-.& .. ?-, 1 c, .. ~ OF CARLSBAD -AGENr , BILL 1-: Q
,_ _ _..~-,~,•-,'71
AB#f!ilv/2Uf/f.11/7 GENERAL PLAN AND LOCAL COASTAL PLAN AMENDMENT: 0 p 0 -TITLE; CAR COUNTRY, HOSP GROVE. CHINQUAPIN, LAUREL E T. H • r.
MTG.12/22/_87 ntEB, SAVAGE/LYMAN AND SEAPOINTE CITY ATTY\JA ,
DEPT. CA CITY MGR. __
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
If council concurs your action is to:
Adopt Resolution No. CJ.JefY approving GPA/LU 87-1 (Car
Country),GPA/LU 87-2 (Hosp Grove), GPA/LU 87-3 (Chinquapin),
GPA/LU 87-4 (Laurel Tree), GPA/LU 87-5 (Savage/Lyman), and
GPA/LU 85-9 (Seapointe)
Adopt Resolution No. ~3~.r approving LCPA 87-l (LCPA 87-2G)
(Chinquapin), LCPA 87-2 (LCPA 87-2F) (Car Country), LCPA 87-3
(LCPA 87-2E) (Laurel Tree), LCPA 87-6 (LCPA 87-2C)
(Savage/Lyman), and LCPA 86-2 (LCPA 87-2D) (Seapointe).
Adopt Resolution No. 9JJ~ approving CT 87-3 and LFMP 87-3(2)
( Car Country) •
Adopt Ordinance No. 9841 approving ZC 87-4 (Hosp Grove)
Adopt Ordinance No. 9843 approving zc 87-2 (Car Country)
Adopt Ordinance· No. 9842 approving SP 19(c) (Car Country)
Adopt Ordinance No. 9844 approving ZC-338 (Seapointe)
Adopt Ordinance No. 9840 approving zc 87-3 (Chinquapin)
ITEM EXPLAHATI(?N
The city Council at your meeting of December 15, 1987 directed
the City Attorney to prepare documents approving various
amendments to the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The
Council approved five negative declarations issued by the
Planning Director, introduced four ordinances making related
zone changes, and introduced an ordinance amending the car
country Specific Plan.
..
As directed we have prepared a resolution approving the general
plan amendments, a resolution approving the local coastal plan
amendments, and a resolution approving the tentative map and
local facilities management plan amendment for car country.
If the council concurs, your action is outlined above.
EXHIBITS
Resolution No. 93,;i 'I
Resolution No. 9J~£
Resolution No. '132 {;,
Ordinance No. 9841
Ordinance No. 9842
Ordinance No. 9843
Ordinance No. 9844
Ordinance No. 9840
l
2
RESOLUTION NO. 9326
A RBSOLOTION OP THE CITY COONCIL OP THE CITY
3 OP CARLSBAD, CALIPORNll APPROvrNG A TENTATIVE
DP AND LOCAL FACILITIES IIAHAGEMEMT PLAN
4 AKBIIDMEN'1' FOR TBB CAR COOMTRY EXPANSION
APPLICANT: CARLTAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
5 CASE HQ; CT 87-3 AND LPMP 87-Jl2)
6 WHEREAS, on November 12, 1987 the Carlsbad Planning
7 Commission adopted Resolution No. 2693 recommending to the City
8 Council that Tentative Map CT 87-3 and Local Facilities Management
9 Plan Amendment 87-3(2) be approved: and
10 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, on
ll Oecemb~r 15, 1987 held a public hearing to consider the
12 recommendations and heard all persons interested in or opposed to
Tentative Map CT 87-3: and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that CT·
87-3 and CFMP 87-3(2) will not have a significant impact on the
environment and the City Council has concurred and a Negative
Declaration was issued and approved in satisfaction of the
requirements of the City of Carlsbad Environmental Protection
19 Ordinance of 1980 and the California Environmental Quality Act;
20 and
21 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
22 the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows:
23
24
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings and conditions of the Planning
25 Commission in Resolution No. 2693 constitute the findings of the
26 City Council in this matter except that Condition No. 45-G has
27 been deleted.
28
l 3. That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone J
2 (LFMP 87-3(2)) is amended as shown in Planning Commission
3 Resolution No. 2701 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated
4 herein by reference.
5 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPl'ED at a Regular Meeting of the
6 City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 22nd day of December
7
8
9
10
ll
12
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
___ , 1987, by the following vote, to wit:
ATTEST:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, Cit1' Clerk
(SEAL)
1 ORDINANCE NO. 9842
2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFIC
3 PLAN AMENDMENT SP-19(C) FOR THE CAR COUNTRY
EXPANSION GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF THE
4 EXISTING CAR COUNTRY.
APPLICANT: CARLTAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
5 CASE No; SP-19CC}
6 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad,
7 California has reviewed and considered a Specific Plan Amendment
8 for future development of the site: and
9 WHEREAS, after procedures in accordance with the
10 requirements of law, the City council has determined that the
11 public interest indicates that said plan be approved.
12 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad
13
14
15
16
17
18
does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That the Car country Expansion Specific Plan
Amendment, SP-19(C), as revised dated December 15, 1987, on file
with the Planning Director and incorporated by reference herein,
is approved. The Specific Plan Amendment shall constitute the
zoning for this property and all development of the property shall
19 conform to the plan.
20 SECTION 2: That the findings and conditions of the
21 Planning Commission in Planning Commission Resolution No. 2692
22 shall also constitute the findings and conditions of the City
23 council.
24 EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective
25 thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify
26 to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at
27 least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days after its
28 adoption.
l INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the
2 Carlsbad City council on the
3 1987, and thereafter
__ 1_5t_h __ day of December
4 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City
5 Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 22nd day of December
6 1987, by the following vote, to wit:
7
8
9
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
10 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
City Attorney
C
ATTEST:
a1;-tb. l R(J.A/4 . -L ~ .
ALETHA L. RAUTENICRANZ, citillerk
QRDilfMCI IQ, . 9843
l
AN ORDINANCE OP THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF
2 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING THE ZONING
3 MAP FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM E-A AND R-A-10,000
TO C-2-Q OH PROPER'l'Y GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF
4 THE EXISTING CAR COUNTRY.
APPLICANT: THE CARLTAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
5 CASE No,; zc 87-2
6 The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California,
7 does ordain as follows:
8 SECTION 1: Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code is
9 amended by the amendment of a zoning map for a zone change from
10 E-A and R-A-10, ooo to C-2-Q on property as shown on the map
11 marked ZC 87-2, Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part
12 hereof.
13 EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective
14 thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify
15 to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at
16 least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen days. after its
17 adoption.
18 INTRODUCED AND FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the
I
19 I Carlsbad City Council held on the _1_5_t_h_ day of __ o_e_c_em_b_e_r ___ ,
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1987, and thereafter
. . . .
• • • •
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
J.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City
Council held on the __ 2_2n_d __ day of __ D_e_c_e_mb_e_r ___ , 1987, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
LEWIS, Mayor
9 ATTEST:
10 ~ d P tG::1i;; 1: a
11 ALETHA L. RAUTENKRANZ, City\Clerk
12 (SEAL)
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
N
i
GENERAL PLAN
IISIDINTIAL
•l ft-"& nr-••tn ,11 1 ••
\
a1 '4 ll "& .. 11\ll >t Oll'«ln 10-U ••• ,,,01t "n,,.,,n, • 11
ll .. tt '4lllll"'4 lflt;II DL ..... "1•1,i
IUI 1111 ;11 o, ... ,n 111-l II
COMMHCIAl
HI. r,tt'<\l\lHt.lO"&LQTAlll .. -C--1
Ill l'Hf,..<t~f •tGl(V,oi4LQTAILIII C.,~~-U ur.m,..,L •111, ICI <.: , v,,,.u·,,n cu•-••·• .. L
" "llt.llllO■IKJUU l"U .. \tflr.LA&. n TM\ll •lll'll'IH"IINllllr.LA&. " ,., ,,r .. 11 ,,._.,_ ■IL'1 ID
I Ml f ,,. 11 ... IN <!Nf<< 111•1■M;T
Pt Pl_..,,_,., !SIN ll■"L
f, (,,-l\ ,."'"'"' , ... II fflf.~ I' _, llttf· I 111.Jtll'
Ill: ■,, 1r 11 It,,. CUMMIIIC':IAL
ICMOOLI
I r!F'4l,-llff
1 11 '<U•■nmn
II lllt:11"( HOIIL ,. ,. ..... ,,
, " , 1r,"" 4,.lf ,
N■• """" U911111fT1,U 11~1~ I
EXISTING
E•A
Zoning
EXHIBIT B
11/4/87
PROPOSED
j R•A•t0,000 > c-20
ZONING
...... NTIAt.
• C f\NONID CO"NL 'Nin •r,o,•
I-A Ullt1flf'1AL 411;■1C\:lfl. lL\I. l:L'NI
1-1 R'■." ll!IIDl.._nM. UTA,W l:UNI 1-1 Ofill M.•IILY IIUll>VOTL4L lOttl
■ J 1"Sn f'l.'lllf IISIDr.tTIAL l:UNI
■• t 'II lTI,U ''-"llY U."Dl""1AL l:ONI ■·" UlltlffD '4l lTI·M. ... LY IIL'IDIIITIAL Z~
ID-M WIOll"TI.Ol DINtin· Mt.LnPU """'
·" IIIJIUlr,n.,L DC!'t'ln-Hir.N ,, ... , Utllf IUIDl,.n,11 MOIIU IIUMI M■ll ZOl'II 1-• ■UIDl~n.u ,-QIIUN,1L 10Nt
If ■UIDl~L lot. Mr ZUl'OI ■-■UIDl''"14L W,11"IIIWIII' &ONI COMMIICIAL n url'ft.1 ,., .. ,
CI ... 1r;,•11t• .. 11.•,nl"f,..._M IALZOl'II
C I Ga,.fllM, f <-• 1A1 lU.,l
CT COM!IOl•:LAL TIii UT ZU.-1 C M II~'\ CL' .. "IIICL\I. WQffU ll'lll'ISTIIIAI. Zo,ol
"" Ml:SftW. l:UfOI P•llt P\NINID ..._~ZONI
OfNle
p • P\UQOf'IAIN O''lll;IY &ONI
LC UMlnOL.Ul'fflllll. °' °""~· .. u 1'1.'IUC unun Z01111
--
GPA/LU 87-1
zc 87-2
SP-19(C)
CT 87-3
LCPA 87-2
WILLIAMSON CONTRACT AMEND. LFMP 87-3(2)
-Ill cu
,U :,
C: •.-1 a
cu cu ... Ill
C: -0 •.-1 "Cl
,U cu
('(I "Cl ,.. C:
('(I cu
'""' a u ('(I cu Q C/l ('(I cu >'""' ..,-f ('(I
,U >
('(I 0 00,.. cu 0. :z 0.
('(I cu .c:16,..j
,U 0
"Cl Ill cu .,U
,U c::
0. cu o a 'ti :,
('(I u
0 ... "Cl
N
..,t cu 00 ,..
O'\ ('(I
0. 'ti cu c:: ,..
('(I 0.
C"'\0 ..,t ,U
00 a, >, cu • c:: U) ,..
0 0 :z ,U
,U ·< "Cl ,.. >,
0 ,U
..,-f
"CIU cu u cu :, .c:
"0 ,U
0 ,.. "Cl
.,U cu C: ,U
•.-1 u cu .-1 1-1
•,-I ..,-f u "Cl C: :, "0 0 C: u ('(I
,-..
00 I
in
'""' I N
'""'
.. z
0
ti c(
~
0 z :::,
0 CJ
AB# C/At./S
MTG. 12/15/87
DEPT., ........... PL=N ____ _
CITV OF CARLSBAD -AGENr" BILL
TITLE· Car Country Expansion -GPA/LU 87-1, ZC
• 87-2, SP-19(C), CT 87-3, LCPA 87-2 (LCPA
87-2F), LFMP 87-3(2), Agricultural Preserve No.
76-1 Contract. Amendment
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Both the Planning Commission and staff are recommending that the
City Council adopt the Negative Declaration issued by the
Planning Director and direct the City Attorney's Office to
prepare documents APPROVING GPA/LU 87-1, CT 87-3, LFMP 87-3(2),
prepare documents introducing Ordinance No.~ APPROVING zc 87-
2, Ordinance N9.~~ APPROVING SP-19(C), and approve LCPA 87-2
(LCPA 87-2F) and Agricultural Preserve No. 76-1 contract
amendment according to Planning Commission Resolutions No.•s 2689
and 2694, and direct staff to forward Council's action to the
California Coastal Commission for consideration.
ITEM EXPLANATION:
The proposed project is a 35 acre eastwardly expansion to the
existing Car Country. The proposed expansion would create 13
lots which would back up to the existing dealerships. Although
the proposed development is relatively straightforward, there are
seven complex discretionary actions which must be approved prior
to development occurring. These include the following:
l. General Plan Amendment
2. zone Change
3. Local coastal Plan Amendment
4. Agricultural Preserve No. 76-1 Contract Amendment
5. Specific Plan Amendment
6. Tentative Tract Map ·
7. Amendment to Local Facilities Management Plan for Zo_ne
3
The General Plan Amendment will change the site's General Plan
designation from RM, Residential Medium, 4-8 du/ac to RRE,
Extensive Regional Retail. The Zone Change will change the
site's zoning from E-A to R-A-10,000 to C-2-Q. The Local Coastal
Plan Amendment revises the development options on the Ecke
property. These amendments allow the landowner, City and Coastal
Commission to more clearly fulfill the intent of the Coastal Act
and Carlsbad's Local Coastal Plan by more consistently and
comprehensively outlining the development potential of the area.
The amendment to the Agricultural Preserve Contract modifies the
boundaries of the land subject to the contract and allows for a
wider variety of agricultural related uses subject to approval of
a conditional use permit. The Specific Plan Amendment
establishes development standards for the expansion of Car
Country. The Tentative Tract Map creates 13 developable parcels
adjacent to the existing car Country and leaves the rest of the
EcM property as a remainder parcel. The Local Facilities Plan
for Zone 3 has been amended to take into account the impact on
public facilities created by the proposed expansion of Car
AGENDA BILL NO.~£
PAGE TWO
Country.
At the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant requested that
the Specific Plan for the Car Country Expansion be modified to
allow auto related uses, banks, and restaurants on the lots
facing Cannon Road. The Specific Plan did not allow banks or
restaurants and limited accessory uses to lots 11 -13, the three
southernmost lots. Staff was especially concerned abput the
appearance of.the Car Country Expansion from Cannon Road and the
possibility of establishing the precedent for strip commercial
along Cannon Road. After discussing the matter, the Commission
voted to limit accessory uses to lots 11 -13 and to permit a
restaurant to locate on lots 11, 12, or 13 upon approval of a
conditional use permit. Some members of the Planning Commission
also felt that building height should be limited to 25 feet
rather than the 30 feet allowed by the Specific Plan.
The Commission voted 6-1 to approve actions necessary for the
expansion of Car Country. For more details, see the attached
staff report.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The Planning Director has determined that this project will not
cause any significant environmental impacts and, therefore, has
issued a Negative Declaration, dated September 11, 1987, which
was approved by the Planning Commission on November 14, 1987. A
copy of the environmental documents is on file in the Planning
Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The proposed expansion of Car Country will be required to pay all
applicable public facilities fees, traffic impact fees, bridge
and thoroughfare fees, and any fees identified by the Zone 3
Local Facilities Management Plan. Development of the additional
automobile dealerships should generate substantial sales tax
revenue for the City of Carlsbad.
EXHIBITS:
1. Location Map
2 • Ordinance No. 's ~~ and 'JLJ.:J
3. Planning Commission Resolutions No. 's 2689, 2690, 2691,
2692, 2693, 2694, and 2701
4. Staff Report, dated November 4, 1987, with attachments
5. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 3 (2) (previously
distributed) ·
MH:dm
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PR-OCRAN
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 3
Plan Sponsor:
City of Carlsbad
1200 Elm Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
{619) 438-5621
Preparer:
Planning Department
City of Carlsbad
2075 Las Palmas Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92009
(619) 438-1161
March 4, 1987
I•
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Introduction •••••• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildout Projections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Phasing .........•.••. . ......................... .
Zone
and
Requirements for Public Facilities
Services .......................... . ........
Analysis of Public Facilities and Improvements
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
City Administrative Facilities ••
Adequacy Findings ••••••••• . . . . . .
Library •••••••••••••••••••••••.•••
Adequacy Findings ••••••••.••••
Wastewater Treatment Capacity. . ....
Adequacy Findings ••.•••••.
Parks ••••••••.•••••••••••
Adequacy Findings ••
Drainage ........•.......
Adequacy Findings •••
Circulation ••••••••••••••
Adequacy Findings •• .. ..
Fire ..•.•..••••.•.•..•••
Adequacy Findings •• . .
Open Space •••• . ......... . . . .
Adequacy Findings •• . . . .
Schools ............... .
Adequacy Findings •• . . .
Collection System •• Sewer
Adequacy Findings •••
Water Distribution System •••
Adequacy Findings ••••••
i
. .. ...
. . . . . . . .... . . . . .
. ............. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.........
.......
........ ......
. . . . . . . ..... .
Page No.
1
10
16
27
32
35
42
44
51
53
57
60
68
70
74
75
80
96
99
100
103
105
109
111
117
119
123
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
VII. Append ices •......••....•••••.....•.•.....••..... 125
Appendix 1. -Glossary......................... 126
Appendix 2. -Growth Management Ordinance...... 132
Appendix 3. -Sources.......................... 151
Appendix 4. -Planning Commission
Resolution No. ?.650. ••.•..• ••••. 152
-City Council
Resolution No. 9084...... ....... 155
ii
Charts, Maps, Tables and
EXHIBITS
Local Facilities Management Plan Map ••••••••••••••••••••
Public Facilities Summary Sheet •••••••••••••••••••••••••
Local Facilities Management Plan Map/Zone 3 •••••••••••••
General Plan -Land Use Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••
Zoning Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••
Existing Land Use Categories, Exhibit A •••••••••••••••••
Existing Commercial Square Footage, Exhibit B •••••••••••
Existing Industrial Square Footage, Exhibit C •••••••••••
Approved Development Projects by
Land Use Categories, Exhibit D •••••••••••••••••••••••
Approved Projects, Exhibl,t E ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Vacant Land Use Categories, E~hlbit F •••••••••••••••••••
Buildout Population Projections •••••••••••••• !••·•· •••••
Re slden t !al Ph a sing ......••...•.........••.........•....
Non-Residential Phasing •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
City Administrative Facilities
Page
2
6
13
14
15
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
29
30
Map............................................ 36
Library
Summary Sheet.................................. 37
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 38
Five-Year CIP.................................. 39
Dwelling Unit and Population Projections,
Exhibit G................................... 40
City . Adm 1 n is tr at 1 v e Fa c i 11 ties, Ex h 1 b 1 t H. • • • • • 41
Zone 3 Demand Comparison, Exhibit I............ 43
Map ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Summary Sheet ••••••.••••.••••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adeauacy Analysis ••••••••
Planning Projections, Exhibit J ••••••••••••••••
Zone 3 Demand Comparison, Exhibit K ••••••••••••
iii
45
46
47
50
52
No.
11/87
Charts, Maps, Tables and
EXHIBITS
(Continued)
Page No.
Wastewater Treatment
Parks
Drainage
Map •••••••••..••••••••••..••••.••••.••••••...•.
Summary Sheet •••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis ••..•••
Phasing ..........................•............
Demand/Capacity ••••..•••••••••••••••••••••••••
Park District Boundary Map •••••...•••••.••••••
Map ••.•..•....••••••••.........•••••••••......
Sum1nary Sheet ................................ .
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •.•.•..
Park Demand Park District 1, Exhibit L ....... .
Park Demand, Zone 3, Park District 1,
Exhibit M ••.........••.•...................
54
55
56
57
58
61
62
63
64
66
67
Map............................................ 71
Sum1nary Sheet.................................. 72
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 73
Circulation
Fire
Map ••••.••••..•••..•••...••••.••••• ·•••••...•.. 76
Summary Sheet................................. 77
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis....... 78
Proposed Improvements
Palomar Airport Road at I-5, Northbounct,
E x h i b i t ~l • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . • . . • • • • • • • . 8 7
Interim Off-Ramp Improvements, Exhibit 0.... 88
Palomar Airport Road at I-5, Southbound,
Ex h lb l t P. . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . • . . • • • . . • . . . . . . . 89
Palomar Airport Road at Paseo del Norte,
Exhlb it Q. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Interim Mitigation Within Existing Curbs,
Exhibit R................................. 91
Trip Generations, Zone 3, Exhibit S. .. .. ..... .. 92
Existing and Proposed Street Improvements -
Map......................................... 93
Buildout Improvements, Table 1........ ......... 94
Map ••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••....••••••
Sun11nary Sheet-................................ .
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis •......
iv
97
98
99
11/87
Charts, Maps, Tables and
EXHIBITS
(Continued)
Page No.
Open Space
Map ••••••••••• ~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••. • • • • • 1 0 1
Summary Sheet. . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . 102
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 103
Schools
School District Boundary Map................... 106
Map............................................ 107
Summary Sheet.................................. 108
Facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 109
Sewer Collection System
Sewer District Boundary Map..................... 112 Map............................................ 113
Summary Sheet.................................. 114
facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 115
Sewer Demand, Exhibit T........................ 118
Water Distribution System
Water Service Boundary Map..................... 120
Map............................................ 121
Summary Sheet_.................................. 122
facility Planning and Adequacy Analysis........ 123
Glossary
Bridge and Thoroughfare District,
Exhibit U..................................... 130
Traffic Impact Fee, Exhibit V.. •. . ..••••• •• •••• 131
V
11/87
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ZONE 3
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
2
City of Carl1bad
Growth Management Program
NOVEMBEFI 1987
11/87
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3 was
prepared pursuant to the City's Growth Management Program, Title
21, Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The contents of
the plan follow the outline established by Section 21.90.110 of
the Growth Management Ordinance. The Zone 3 plan is consistent
with the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, and it
implements the Citywide plan adopted September 23, 1986.
The original plan was approved May 19, 1987 by City Council
Resolution No. 9084. The plan was subsequently amended to allow
for the expansion of Car Country and a boundary adjustment for
Zones 3 and 13. This boundary change increased the acreage in
Zone 3 by 35 acres and reduced Zone 13 by the samP. amount.
The Zone 3 plan begins with the assumptions used to
generate the buildout p~ojections for residential and non-
residential development within the Zone. The plan then phases or
estimates the Zone's development on a yearly basis until buildout.
The phasing is done to predict future facility demands. Each
facility that is required to be addressed ls then analyzed. The
analysis includes an inventory of existing and proposed
facilities, a phasing schedule that establishes the timing for the
provision of facilities in relationship to demand, and a financing
plan that establishes various methods of funding facilities and
improvements that are identified by the plan as needed. Since
this Zone plan is a regulatory document, each facility section
also contains conditions to ensure that public facilities will
conform to the adopted performance standards. The conditions will
be adopted as part of the Zone 3 approval, and mandatory
compliance will regulate future development within the zone.
The purpose of the summary chart shown below is to provide
a brief synopsis of the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone
3 •
City Ad ■lnistratlve
SUMMARY CHART
Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard until the year
2005.
3 11/87
Library
Wastewater
Treatment Capacity
Parks
Drainage
Circulation
Fire
Open Space
Existing and programm~d facilities
meet the adopted performance stand-
ards until the year 2003.
Existing facilities
performance standard
Zone 3.
meet the adopted
to buildout of
Park District 1 conforms with the
adopted performance standard until
1990.
Existing facilities meet the adopted
performance standard to buildout of
Zone 3.
The existing road seqments and
intersections in Zone 3 currently
meet the adopted performance stan-
dard. However, when the demand from
Citywide approved projects is added
then three intersections in Zone 3
will not meet the performance stan-
dard. These include:
1 ) Northbound I-5 at Palomar Airport
Road
2) Southbound I-5 at Palomar Airport
Road
3 ) Palomar Airport Ro i'IO at Paseo del
Norte
These improvements will have to be
installed within one to three years.
Existing facilities meet the adoptect
performance standard to buildout of
the Zone.
The Citywide Improvements Plan, as
adopted on 9/23/86, indicated that
Zone 3 as well as Zones 1-10 and 16
are already developed and meet or
exceed open space requirements and
do not have to address Open Space
in the Local Facilities Management
Plan.
4 11/87
Schools
Sewer Collection
Syste11
Water Distribution
Existing school facilities currently
have the capacity to meet the
the demand generated by Zone 3.
Because future demand ls minimal,
the school district will be able to
to provide capacity to buildout of
the Zone.
The City of Carlsbad Sewer Service
District will meet the adopted per-
formance standard to bulldout.
Water service to Zone 3 meets the
adopted performance standard to the
buildout of the Zone.
5 11/87
PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET
Conformance with Adopted Standard
Cit~wide Quadrant Zone 3
1) City Administrative Facilities Until 2005 N/A N/A
2) Library* Yes,until 2003 M/A NA
3) Waste Water Treatment Capacity Yes With Phase IV expansion
4) Parks N/A Until 1992 N/A
To Buildout
5) Drainage N/A N/A Yes
6) Circulation N/A N/A Yes*
To Buildout
7) Fire N/A N/A Yes
To Buildout
8) Open Space N/A N/A Yes
To Buildout
9) Schools N/A N/A Yes
To Buildout
10) Sewer Collection System N/A M/A YES
To Buildout
11) Water Oistribution System N/A N/A YES
N/A = Not Applicable
* See Page 81, which .fully describes the circulation conditions
and proposed mitigation.
6 11/87
1.
CENERAL CONDITIONS
All development within Zone
provisiorys of Section 21.90 of
and to the provisions and
Facilities Management Plan.
3 shall conform to the
the Carlsbad Municipal Code
conditions of this Local
2. All development within Zone 3 shall be required to pay a
public facility fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the
City Council on July 28, 1987, and as amended from time to
time and all other applicable fees. Development in Zone 3
shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be
incorporated into this plan that are found to be necessary to
enable facilities to meet the adopted performance standard.
3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 3
pursuant to Subsections 21.90.130{c), {d) and {e) of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
4. All development in Zone 3 shall be in conformance with the
adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted
by City Council Resolution 8797 on September 23, 1986.
5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 3 Local Facilities Management
Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to
add conditions and upgrade standards as determined through
the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may
be initiated by action of the Planning Commission or City
Council at anytime.
6. If a public facility or service is found to not be in
conformance with an adopted performance standard during the
yearly monitoring, or at any other time, the matter will be
immediately brought before the City Council. If the City
Council determines that a non-conformance does exist then no
future building or development permits shall be issued until
those facilities are brou~ht into conformance with the
adopted performance standard •
. 7. After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building
permits will be issued unless the performance standards are
complied with. This includes all projects which were exempt
under Section 21.90.030 (c) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 3
The following Special Conditions apply specifically to
development in Zone 3 and must be complied with in addition to
the General Conditions for Zone 3. These conditions are also
listed separately under the analysis discussion of each
facility.
7 11/87
City Administrative Facilities
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
Library
No special condition~ are necessary at this time.
Wastewater Treatment Capacity
1. The following actions shall be pursued by the City to ensure
adequate wastewater treatment capacity throughout a five (5)
year period.
a. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a monthly basis
to determine actual flow rates and to have an P-arly
warning of capacity problems.
b. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of treatment
plant Phase IV expansion to provide adequate capacity.
c. When Carlsbad's
actively seek
agencies.
sharP.
leased
of Encina flows reach 5.25 MGD,
capacity from other Encina
d. When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 MCD, proceed to
activation of the Calavera Hills Reclamation/Treatment
Facility. Plant to be activated when more cost effective
treatment measures are no longer Feasihle and Carlsbad
capacity at Encina has been reached.
2. All development within Zone 3 shall pay the applicable
required Carlsbad Sewer District fees.
Parks
All
Facility
will he
construct
DrainaQe
development shall pay Park-In-lieu fees and Public
Fees for Park District 1. No residential development
allowed after 1990 unless actions have been taken to
additional park facilities.
Drainage facilities shall be provided at the time of
development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
8 11/87
Circulation
Fire
1 ) All future
pay Traffic
participate
District.
development within Zone 3 shall continue to
Impact Fees, Public Facilities Fees and
in the Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit
2) An on-going monitoring system shall be established to
evaluate the aspects of improvements, development, and
demand on circulation facilities. The required
improvements of ~ section may be modified without
formal amendment to this plan.
3} Should the performance standard of any facility within
Zone 3 fall below the adopted level of service, all
discretionary approvals or development permits shall be
halted _until such time as appropriate mitigation is
installed and the performance standard has been met.
4) Based upon the projected traffic volumes, the I-5/
Palomar Airport Road and the Paseo del Norte/Palomar
Airport Road mitigation shall be designed, bonded, a
schedule submitted and approved by the City Engineer
indicating completion of these inter.sections within one
to three years. Specifically, the mitigation required
ls:
(1) Free right turn I-5 northbound off-ramp to
eastbound Palomar Airport Road.
(2) Interim signalization of I-5 northbound off-
ramp.
(3) Interim signalization of I-5 southbound off-
ramp.
(4) Dual left turn lanes for Palomar Airport Road
eastbound to northbound Paseo del Norte
movement/replacement of median, restripping
the westbound lanes and the addition of
detector loops.
5) In any event, these improvements must he in place as
needed to maintain conformance with the performance
standard or all development will be stopped in zones
which impact these interesections should the standard
not be met.
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
Schools
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
9 11/87
Sewer Collection System
No special conditions are necessary at this time.
Water Distribution System
All development within Zone 3 shall pay the required Costa
Real Municipal Water District fees.
9a
10
INTRODUCTION
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this Local Facility Management Plan is to
complete the second phase of the overall Growth Management Plan
for Zone 3 within the City of Carlsbad. Phase One of the Growth
Management Program established the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan based upon a phased buildout of the City's
existing General Plan. For purposes of public facilities
analysis, the City has been separated into 25 Local Facilities
Management Zones as shown on "Local Facility Management Plan
Boundaries", on Page 2.
PLAN OVERVIEW
This plan for Zone 3 provides a detailed description and
analysis of how this area of the City will develop from its
current status to buildout. The plan also demonstrates how and
when each facility and improvement will be constructed in order
to accommodate development within the Zone (phasing). It also
provides a complete description of how each facility and
improvement will be financed when mitigation is necessary.
The body of the plan ls divided into separate sections for
each public facility. In each section there will be a summary
sheet which highlights the important information described in the
analysis. This summary is broken down into three categories:
Existing, Existing plus approved, and Future. The demand column
in each of these categories will show two numbers:
Demand
The top number (1) represents the Citywide, Quadrant or
Zone demand, depending upon the public facility being evaluated.
The lower number (2) represents the specific zone demand for the
public facility.
Following the summary sheet will be the detailed analysis
and additional information for the public facility. If a
·facility is not conforming with the adopted performance standard,
there will be a discussion describing this situation, a
mitigation or alternatives section, and a financing discussion.
Each facility subsection will conclude with a sub-section,
"Adequacy Findings". This section will summarize whether or not
the public facility conforms with the adopted performance
standard.
11
ZONE 3 -OVERVIEW
The plan for Zone 3 is consistent with all aspects of the
Citywide Facilities and Improvement Plan and ensures that the
adopted performance standards shall be complied with as
development occurs.
Local Facilities Management Zone 3 is bounded on the west
by the Pacific Ocean, on the north by Agua Hedionda Lagoon, on
the east by the Ecke agricultural preser~e, and on the south
generally by Palomar Airport Road.
On August 4, 1987 the City Council aprroved a boundary adjustment
for Zone 3 to incorporate an approximately 35 acre area which
will be the site of the Car Country expansion. This boundary
change necessitated a complete review of the Zone 3 plan and each
facility analysis.
The area is completely built out with the exception of a few
infill lots and/or the expansion of existing developments.
Future development of the zone includes single-family residences,
duplexes, and commercial and industrial uses.
The Map, "General Plan Land Use", shown on Page 14,
denotes the General Plan Lanrl Use for Zone 3. The accompanying
Land Use Zoning is shown on the, "Zoning" map, on Page 15.
12 11/87
ZONE 3
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEl\1ENT PLAN
City of Carlsbad
Growth Management Program
'•..OVl!MBER 1987 ----------------------------
13
;·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· . I .
.' u
ZONE 1
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
GENERAL PLAN-LAND USE
Al & Sf RR
OS
RESIDENTIAL Rl lO'.l'OENSln'(0-15,)
JU.J.t LO\l',MEOIUM DENSITY(O·O
RM MEOHIM OENs1n· ( <t-H)
lllMH MEOllJM illC.11 DENSITY l1:1·1') RII ltlGII llENSJTY(lS·H)
COMMERCIAL
RRI INTENSIVE REGIONAL JlfTAIL
RR£ EXTENSl\'E REGIONAL RETAIL
RS REGION.U SERVICE
C COMllotllNJn· COMMERCI.U
N NEH,llff(>KlloOO COMMERCL\L
TS TRA\'EI. SERVICES COMMERCL\L
0 PKOffSSJON,\l RH.A.TEO
COO CENTR.o\L BUSINESS UISTIUCT
Pl PL\NNEO INOtlSTRIAL
G GO\'EkNMfNT f.o\CILJTIES
U Pl/01 IC L!'TIUTJES
I\C Rf.CREATION c;OMMERCL\L
US Ot'ENSP.-KE
NA.Jl NON RESll>ENTlAL RESERVE
ZONE 22
ZONE 4
Cily of CMllbad
G,o.,lh Managam.,. Proga,n
NOVEMBER 1 9 a 1
-U1
.
ZONE 1 I .
I .
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
ZONING
LEGEND
RESIDINTIAL
P·C PUNNED COMMUNITY ZONE
R·A llESIDENTIAI. AGRICULnJllAL ZONE R·E RURAi. RESIDENTIAi. EsTATE ZONE R· I ONE•fAMltY REslDENTIAL ZONE
R-2 lWO-fAMILY RESIDENTIAi. ZONE R·5 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENnAL ZONE R·3L LIMITED MULll•fAMILY RESIOENTVJ. ZONE
RD·M IIESIDENTIAL DENSln'·~IULTIPLE ZONE
RD·H RESIDENTIAL DENSITY-HIGH ZONE
IL\IHP llESIDENTIAL MOBIU. HOME l'MK ZONE
R·P WIDErfT1AL PROFESSIONAL ZONE
Rf RE.SIIJENllAL TOURJST ZONE
RW RESIDENTIAL WATERWAY ZONE
COMMERCIAL 0 OfflCE ZONE
C-l NEIGHBORHOOO COMMERCIAL ZONE
C·l GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE C·T COMMERCIAL·TOl!RIST ZONE C·M HEAVY COMMERCIAL·UMITED INDUST1tL\J. ZONE
M lNDUSTIUAl ZONE
P·M PLANNED INDUS1ll1AL ZONE
L·C UMJTED CONTIIOL
OS OPEN SPACE
P·U P\/1\UC um.rrv ZONE
City ol C1t1JNG
Growth ~gemenl Prag,..
II
NOVENSER 1 9 s 7
16
BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS
II. BUILDOUT ASSUMPTIONS AND PROJECTIONS
To adequately assess and plan for public facilities and
services in Zone 3, it ls necessary to project the level of
development that can be anticipated at the ultimate buildout of
this Zone. Buildout projections are used to determine existing
residential and non-residential land uses and to assess the
ultimate potential that may be reached at the time Zone 3 ls
built out. The ultimate buildout of Zone 3 has been approximated
by examining:
1. the amount of existing land use,
2. the amount of approved, yet undeveloped land uses, and
3. the vacant land which can still be developed. The methodology
used to compile the buildout projections ls consistent with
that used in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan and
assumptions are described below:
1 • Existing Land Uses
Surveys and analysis were conducted to determine the
acreage of each land use category within Zone 3. Field
checks and subsequent research ascertained how each
parcel was actually being utilized as well as the square
footage of existing commercial/industrial structures.
The following Exhibits detail this information:
E·xhib it A, "Existing Land Use Categories", Page 20.
Exhibit B, "Existing Commercial Square Footaqe", Page
21.
Exhibit c, "Existing Industrial Square Footage", Page
22.
Approved But Undeveloped Land
Exhibit D, "Approved Development Projects By Land Use
Category", on Page 23 includes land uses which have
approved projects but which have not been developed as
of January 1, 1987. Buildout is constrained by approved
projects because the land has been committed t~ a
particular use or density, even though it is presently
vacant. Approved projects are those which have received
discretionary approval by the Planning Commission and/or
City Council.
17
3. Vacant land
All vacant land was inventoried by land use type to
determine ultimate buildout of the zone. The Citywide
plan directed all environmentally constrained land to be
subtracted from the gross acreage figure for vacant
land. Zone 3 ls in an infill area, however, and the
remaining vacant land has very minimal environmental
constraints.
There are currently 231 existing residential units in Zone
3, however, when applying the growth control yield densities to the
available residential land within the Zone, this results in a
theoretical yield of 186 units.
58.2 (acres of RLM) x 3.2 (Growth Control Point) = 186
Units
The current residential units total exceeds the growth
control yield and the future buildout of this Zone will add an
additional 21 units (which includes 15 single family dwelling and 3
duplexes). At buildout, the zone will exceed the growth control
yield by 66 units. Because remaining development in this Zone is
minimal, residential density will be balanced out by reduced
development in other areas of the northwest quadrant. Therefore,
9rowth will continue to be below the control point in this
quadrant. Staff finds that there are facilities to service this
demand created by Zone 3, as well as capacity in the quadrant to
allow the residential unit total to exceed the growth control
yield.
A set of assumptions regarding site coverage for industrial
and commercial development was applied to the net developable
acreage figures. It was assumed that every net developahle acre of
industrial/commercial would result in a maximum square footage
yield of 40%. This yield is based upon researching existing files.
It takes into consideration height limits, setback requirements,
and other regulations which affect overall lot coverage.
See Exhibit F, "Vacant land Use Categories" on Page 25, for
vacant land uses in Zone 3.
18
NOTE: This page was left blank
1 9
HIBIT A
ZONE 3
EXISTING LAND USE CATEGORIES
Listed below are the type and acreage of each land use category within
Zone 3.
GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION
RESIDENTIAL:
RL Low Density (0-1.5)
RLM Low-Med Density (0-4)
RM Medium Density (4-8)
RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15)
RH High Density (15-23)
COMMERCIAL:
CBO Central Business District
C Community
N Neighborhood
RC Recreation
TS Travel Services
0 Professional & Related
RRE Extensive Regional Retail
RRI Intensive Regional Retail
RS Regional Service
INDUSTRIAL:
PI Planned Industrial
OTHER:
E
J
H
HC
p
G
u
NRR
OS
RR
FW
MAJ
MIN
COL
Elementary School
Junior High School
High School
Continuation School
Private School
Government Facility
Public Utilities
Non-Residential Reserve
Open Space
Park
City Owned
State Owned Beaches
State Owned Misc.
Miscellaneous
Railroad
Freeway
Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector Street
TOTAL ACREAGE
20
DWELLING
UNITS
231
ACRES
58.2
ACRES
6.3
49.6
2.6
78.0
0.9
75.2
4.2
140.6
98.6
29.0
58.2
3.3
39 .1
47.4
691.2
1.7
7.9
63.1 n.3
2.6
11/87
EXHIBIT B
ZONE 3
EXISTING COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
ASSESSOR'S CAR GAS
PARCEL NUMBER DEALERSHIP RESTAURANT RETAIL MOTEL STATION
211-060-12 3,128
211-060-13 1,105
211-060-02 15,929
211-060-10 45,549
211-060-16 25,516
211-060-09 15,321
211-060-17 6,691
211-060-18 28,395
211-060-19 27,900
211-060-15 25,858
211-060-14 10,400
211.,.060-07 40,853
211-060-06 25,939
211-050-10
Al fredos Dos 2,265
211-050-04
Hadleys 20,160
211-040-21,27
All Star Inn 23,843
211-040-29
Tip Top 17,424
211-170-10
Marie Callendars 13,151
210-170-06
McDonalds 4,533
210-010-07
Exxon 1,439
210-010-22,23
Pea Soup Andersens 27,585 1,000 71,589 3,200
211-050-01
Denny's 4,125
211-050-02
Mobil 1,579
211-050-06
Nursery land 5,040
Total 272,584 51,659 43,624 95,432 6,218
21 3/87
.EXHIBIT C
ZONE 3
EXISTING INDUSTRIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE
ASSESSOR'S INDUSTRIAL/
PARCEL NUMBER PM OFFICE GOVERNMENT UTILITY
211-050-08 Caltrans 8,652
211-050-09 23,932
211-040-25 1,152
210-090-36 51,000
210-090-43 6,210
210-090-44 · 20,385
210-090-39 52,000
210-090-37,25,26,27
28,29,30,31 34,830
210-090-32,33,34,35
41,42 125,215
210-090-45 84,432
210-090-46,48 151,000
210-017-08,09 11,013
210-017-04 68,222
211-030-27 79,362
211-030-28 12,132
211-030-32 20,940
211-030-31 20,000
211-030-30 18,726
211-030-25 108,126
211-03-06,08 Encina WPCF 64,400
211-040-25 1,152
210-010-26,32,33,
206-070-06 SDG&E 247,434
TOTAL 889,829 8,652 311,834
22 3/87
EXHIBIT D
ZONE 3
APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY LAND USE CATEGORIES
Listed below are the type and acreage of each land use category with
approved, but unbuilt, projects within Zone 3.
GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION
RESIDENTIAL:
RL Low Density (0-1.5)
RLM low-Med Density (0-4)
RM Medium Density ( 4-8)
RMH Med-Hi Density (8-15)
RH High Density (15-23)
COMMERCIAL:
CBD Central Business District
C Community
N Neighborhood
RC Recreation
TS Travel Services
0 Professional & Related
RRE Extensive Regional Retail
RRI Intensive Regional Retail
RS Regional Service
INDUSTRIAL:
PI Planned Industrial
OTHER:
E
J
H
HC
p
G
u
NRR
OS
Elementary School
Junior High School
High School
Continuation School
Private School
Government Facility
Public Utilities
Non-Residential Reserve
Open Space
DWELLING
UNITS
ACRES
8 .1
5.4
* See Exhibit E for a further breakdown of specific projects.
23 3/87
City File
Number
CUP-246
SOP 83-11
CUP-284
ZONE 3
APPROVED PROJECTS
Project Gross
Name Acres
Minlwarehouse & Office
Complex 8.1
Palomar & Co. 4.72
7-Eleven .67
24
EXHIBIT E
Approved
Sguare Footage
104,068-Warehouse
70,000-0ffice
109,000-Restaur-
ant, Theatre,
Hotel
4,872-Retall
Store
3/87
EXl-lIBIT F
ZONE 3·
VACANT LAND USE CATEGORIES
As of January 1, 1987, the following types and amounts of land use were vacant
and not in the development process.
GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE DESIGNATION
RESIDENTIAL:
RL Low Density (0-1.5)
RLM Low-Med Density (0-4)
Single Family
Duplex
RM Medium Density (4-8)
RMH Med-Hi Oensity (8-15)
RH High Density (15-23)
COMMERCIAL:
CBD Central Busines·s District ·
C Community
N Neighborhood
RC Recreation
TS Travel Services
0 Professional & Related
RRE Extensive ~egion~l Retail
RRI Intensive Regional Ret~il
RS Regional Service
IUDUSTRIAL:
PI Planned Industrial
OTHER:
E
J
H
HC
p
G
u
MRR
OS
Elementary School
Junior High School
High School
Continuation School
Private School
Government Facility
Public Utilities
Non-Residential Reserve
Open Space
25
GROSS
VACANT
ACRES
5.15
.42
15.9
1.0
35
11.3
4.0
20.5
70.1
NET
VACAtlT
ACRES
5.15
.42
6.4
.4
28
A.. 5
1.6
8.2
70.1
11/87
POTENTIAL
nWELLING
UNITS
15
6
BUILDOUT POPULATION PROJECTION
Residential
The
Management
generation
existing,
breakdown,
residential buildout population projection for
Zone 3 was determined by applying a population
rate of 2.471 persons per dwelling unit to the
approved and potential future units. The population
·therefore, is as follows:
Units
Existing 232
Approved 0
Future 20
Buildout Population Projection
Rate
2.471 =
X 2.471 =
X 2.471 =
Population
= 573
0
= 50
623
The buildout population projections are used consistently
throughout this plan for the purpose of predicting demand for
public facilities and improvements.
Non-Residential
The non-residential buildout projection for Management
Zone 3 was determined by totaling the existing, approved and
potential future square footage by use cate~ory. Auilding
permit files were researched to determine the existinq and
approved square footage. Vacant land square footage was
calculated by multiplying the gross vacant acres (found on
Exhibit F Vacant Land Use Categories) by 40%. The non-
residential bulldout breakdown, therefore is as follows:
Existing
Approved
Future
Non-Residential Buildout Projection
26
Square Footage
1,679,832
287,940
1,324,224
3,291,996
11/87
27
PHASING
III. PHASING -AN OVERVIEW
It is necessary to provide a phasing schedule of
development for the entire City, each quadrant, and each of the
25 Local Facility Management Zones for the purpose of:
1. Projecting future demands for public facilities on a
yearly basis; and
2. Establishing the thresholds which identify when a
public facility is needed; and
3. Assisting with the development of the City's Capital
Improvement Program budqet.
In the Citywide Plan, phasing of residential development
was 1,250 dwelling units per year. These projections were based
on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital
Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management Systems,
Monitoring Report of April, 1986.
In each Local Plan a key element will be the projected
phasing schedule of development within that specific zone. These
schedules are presented for the purpose of estahlishing
thresholds for demand and future demands for puhlic facilities.
By projecting these future public facility and improvement
demands the appropriate funds may be allocated into the Capital
Improvement Budget to assure they are in place as development
occurs. The phasing schedule is not presented to estahlish a
rate of growth within the City. It will he used to assure that
growth occurs only as public facilities are available to ensure
compliance with the adopted performance standards.
The specific phasing schedule presented in this plan ls
provided to accomplish the three purposes of phasing which were
discussed above. These projections have been established by
reviewing development in the pipeline which have tentative and
final maps as well as applications pending. The same type of
phasing has been prepared for SANDAG's Series VII for the entire
City and will be utilized to review phasing projections presented
in this and other local plans to determine the overall impact on
public facilities and services.
Zone 3 -Phasinq Schedule
Phasing for Zone 3 incorporates the Citywide projections
as well as localized factors unique to the Zone. These localized
circumstances include:
1. The amount and type of developing projects:
-Final Maps
-Tentative Maps
-Applications Pending
28
2. The ultimate type and amount of land use potential.
3. The amount of development that can he reasonably
absorbed into the market.
The specific residential phasing schedule for Zone 3 is
shown below. The schedule assumes the zone will be completely
built out by the end of 1995. The schedule phases those projects
identified in the developing process beginning in 1987 through
1995. During this time period it is estimated that a total of 21
additional residential units will be built in Zone 3.
Year
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
RESIDENTIAL PHASING
Zone 3
Yearly
Dwelling
Increase
1
3
3
5
2
2
2
2
1
Total
Dwelling
Units
231
232
235
238
243
245
247
249
251
252
The phasing schedule assumes the zone's vacant or under
developed land (with no applications penrling) will be developed
beginning in 1987 and phased through the buildout of the zone.
In all, a total of 252 residential dwelling units will exist at
the buildout of Zone 3. This residential total, although above
the growth control point, is in compliance with the Carlsbad
Municipal Code as modified by the passage of Proposition Eon
November 4, 1986 because adequate public facilities can be
provided. Although this zone exceeds the growth control point,
future development potential is minimal and it will be balanced
out by reduced development in other areas of the northwest
quadrant.
29 11/87
In Zone 3 the non-residential land uses will be phased
based upon previous growth trends, location of parcels, and
current applications being considered by the Plannin9
Department.
The
by 1996.
The total
F, "Vacant
YEAR
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
non-residential land uses will be completely built out
This assumes a phasing schedule which begins in 1987.
vacant non-residential land uses are shown on Exhibit
Land Use Categories" on Page 25.
NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING
Zone 3
INDUSTRIAL ACREAGE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE
2.2 4.7
2.7 25.6
18.2
6.0
2.9
2.3
3.4
1.0
.1
7.6
Total Acreage 11.3 65.4
30 11/87
Phasing Summary
It is estimated that ·the remaining re~idential units in
Zone 3 will develop by 1995. Yearly residential growth is
expected to range from a high of five units in 1990 to a low of
one unit in 1994 and 1995. Non-residential development of Zone 3
was estimated to build out by 1996. The plan assumed that the
already approved commercial projects plus vacant planned
industrial at Avenida Encinas and Cannon Road would develop
first. The plan also assume·d that the 7 .6 acre parcel (owned by
Carltas) between Paseo del Norte and I-5 would be the last to
develop because there are a number of regulatory (local Coastal
Program) constraints that will require time to resolve. Future
non-residential growth is projected to peak in 1988 (493,099 sq.
ft.) and reach a low in 1995 (1,742 sq. ft.).
The specific phasing of Zone 3, is presented for the
purpose of determining future annual demand and thresholds for
public facilities. It ls lmpossihle to predict the exact way
development will occur in this zone of the City, but through
these phasing projections the City will be able to establish a
direct link between development and the need for public
facilities. This link will allow the City to ensure compliance
with the adopted performance standards at all times as growth
occurs. And if compliance is not maintained, development will be
stopped until it conforms with the adopted performance
standards.
31 11/87
32
ZONE
REQUIREMENTS
IV. ZONE REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES ANO SERVICES
The Management Plan for Zone 3 addresses eleven separate
facilities:
1. City Administrative Facilities
2. Library
3. Wastewater Treatment Capacity
4. Parks
5. Drainage
6. Circulation
7. Fire
8. Open Space
9. Schools
10. Sewer Collection System
11. Water Distribution System
Each of these facilities will be evaluated to determine
conformance with the adopted performance standard. The
evaluation will be made in three stages based on existing demand,
approved or committed demand, and future demand at buildout.
For each of these facilities and services the followinq is
provided:
1. An illustrative map showing what ls existinq and what
will be needed as the zone develops to its ultimate
buildout;
2. District boundary maps where facilities are provided
by special districts (ie., school, water, sewer).
3. Adopted service level performance standards which
must be complied with at all times as growth occurs;
and
4. A detailed facility planninq and adequacy analysis
for each of the public facilities and services.
5 • A list of special
ensure conformance
standard.
conditions for each facility to
with the adopted performance
6. A discussion of mitigation measures and financinq
mechanisms relevant to each facility.
The Citywide facilities, which include City Administrative
Facilities, Lihrary, and Waste Water Treatment, have been
analyzed in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. These
will also be included in the Local Facility Management Plan to
show compliance or to suggest alternatives to assure conformance
with the adopted standard.
33
In any case, this analysis will show how each of the
adopted performance standards will be compiled with as
development occurs within the City, quadrant, and zone. This
plan includes financing of all public facilities and services
where non-conformance with the standard requires mitigation. It
also includes a complete phasing schedule for all development
within the zone.
34
35
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE
FACILITIES
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
ZONE 3
t
• CITY AOMINISTRATION-&XISTING
Q CITY AGMINISTRATION-PLANNl!D
ZONE 3
,-r---
-----.. ~t I , , ,
I •o
I \ ' ', ,, .... " ' ' I I
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
36
I I
I
/ I \
AMEl'!'lEO
NOVEME&I ~ 98
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
SUMMARY SHEET
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
BUILD OUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Carlornw.:e MITIGATION FUNDING w/S1 ll'ldar d)
EXISTING 86,539
106,084 YES N/A N/A
856
118,867
APPROVED
168,084 YES N/A N/A
(!) 856 z -Cl)
< :c 202,37 a.
FUTURE NO
168,084** ------YES***
934
* As of January 1, 1987, 32,328 square feet of demand has been
approved.
** In the year 2005 this facility will no longer conform to the
adopted performance standard.
*** Zone 3 is scheduled· to phase out all of its residential land'by
1995.
37 11/87
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
1,500 square feet per 1,000 population must be scherlulea
for construction within a five year period.
II. FACILITY PLANNI~G AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or
not the performance standard is being met, and if the demand for
Zone 3 complies with the overall Citywide analysis of City
Administrative Facilities.
A. Inventory
1. Buildout Assumptions:
Current (Citywide/Zone)
Buildout (Citywide/Zone)
Population
57,495/571
134,914/623
Required
Square Footaoe
86,539/856
202,371/934
2. Existinq City Administrative Facilities:
City Hall Facilities
City Hall
Finance Dept. Modular
Purchasing/Personnel
Dept. Modular
Leased Space
Redevelopment
Community Development Dept.
Las Palmas Facility
Public Safety and Service Center
Phase I
Police and Fire Depts.
Vehicle Maintenance
Totals
Total Existing Facilities
38
SQUARE FEET
Square Footage Temporary
Permanent Space Space
12,899
22,627
53,700
10,358
99,584
2,700
1,800
4,500
Leased
Space
2,000
2,000
106,084
11/87
As indicated on the table on the previous page,
approximately 241 of existing administrative facilities are
leased and 4.21 are temporary (portable modular units}. If the
rental leases are terminated or the modulars are no longer used,
the existing square footage of City Administrative Facilities
will be reduced. At that time, the Management Plan for Zone 3,
as well as the Citywide Plan, will need to be amended to modify
the phasing assumptions in order to plan for more City
Ad~lnistrative Facilities at an earlier time.
3. Facilities in City's Five Year Capital Improvements
Program:
Item
a. Public Safety Center
Phase II*
Design
Construction
Sq. Ft. Year
86-87
62,000 89-90
Amount Source
$ 255,000 PFF**
$3,455,000 PFF/S/W**
b. Total Facilities in City's 5 Year Capital Improvements Program.
62,000 square feet
* Public Safety Center Phase II. Yard offices,
Maintenance shops, and Purchasing warehouse for
the use of Utility Maintenance, Parks &
Recreation Maintenance, Street Maintenance and
Purchasing. Approximate size is 62,000 square
feet. This includes a two-story yard office and
Purchasing warehouse with a 6,400 square foot
mezzanine.
** PFF -Public Facilities Fee
S -Sewer
W -Water Enterprise
39
From these population projections a demand for City
Administrative Facilities has been assessed. The specific
phasing for Zone 3 is being projected based on the number of
projects which are currently pending review, have received
tentative approvals, or have received final approvals. The exact
timing of these specific projects may vary, however, the timing
of necessary public facility improvements would also vary
accordingly. This will assure that the adopted performance
standards will be met as development occurs. Exhibit G is
provided as a projection of growth throughou~ the City of
Carlsbad on a yearly basis.
EXHIBIT G
P L A N N I N G P R O J E C T I O N S O N L Y
DWELLING UNIT ANO POPULATION PROJECTIONS
ASSUMING A BUILDING RATE OF 1250 UNITS PER YEAR
AND 2.471 PERSONS PER DWELLING UNIT
YEAR EXISTING REMAINING PROJECTED
GROWTH
BEGINNING
YEAR
POP.
ENDING
YEAR
POP.
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
B. Phasing
o.u.•s c.u.•s
23,348
24,598
25,848
27,098
28,348
29,598
30,848
32,098
33,348
34,598
35,848
37,098
38,348
39,598
40,848
42,098
43,348
44,598
45,848
47,098
48,348
49,598
50,848
52,098
53,348
54,598
54,599
31,251
30,001
28,751
27,501
26,251
25,001
23,751
22,501
21,251
20,001
18,751
17,501
16,251
15,001
lJ,751
12,501
ll,251
10,001
8,751
7,501
6,251
5,001
3,751
2,501
l,251
l
0
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
l,250
l,250
1,250
1,250
l,250
l,250
1,250
l,250
1,250
l,250
l,250
l,250
l,250
l,250
l,250
l,250
l,250
l,250
l,250
l
57,693
60,782
63,870
66,959
70,048
73,137
76,225
79,314
82,403
85,492
88,580
91,669
94,758
97,847
100,935
104,024
107,113
110,202
113,290
116,379
119,468
122,557
125,645
128,734
131,823
134,912
60,782
63,870
66,959
70,048
73,137
76,225
79,314
82,403
85,492
88,580
91,669
94,758
97,847
100,935
104,024
107,113
110,202
113,290
116,379
119,468
122,557
125,645
128,734
lJl,823
134,912
134,914
Population projections for the entire City were made
within the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan which have
been updated and are shown on Exhibit G. This exhibit shows the
yearly demand for City Administrative Facilities as well as the
yearly demand created by Zone 3 based on the projected Citywide
phasing.
40
.... .... --00 "'
CITYWIDE AND ZONE 3 · PHASING OF CITY ADMINISTATIVE FACILITIES
• PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY*
I CITYWIDE ZONE 3
CITYWIDE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
............................. , .......•• ~~~~.~~~.~~~~:~:~:~ ........••••••••••...•..............• ~~~~·································
STATUS NOTES AS OF I D.U.'S POP. so. FT. OF CONFORMANCE/ I D.U.'S POP SQ. FT. ZONE 3'S X JAN 1 (2.471/DU) DEMAND SUPPLY (NON·CONFORMANCE) (2.471/DU) OF DEMAND OF THE TOTAL
EXISTING
PROJECTED
BUILDOUT
(1)
1987 23,348
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
24,598
25,848
27,098
28,348
29,598
30,848
32,098
33,348
34,598
35,848
37,098
38,348
39,598
40,848
42,098
43,348
44,598
45,848
47,098
48,348
49,598
50,848
52,098
53,348
54,598
54,599
57,693 86,539 106,084
60,782
63,870
66,959
70,048
73, 137
76,225
79,314
82,403
85,492
88,580
91,669
94,758
97,847
100,935
104,024
107,113
110,202
113,290
116,379
119,468
122,557
125,645
128,734
131,823
134,912
134,914
91, 172
95,806
100,439
105,072
109,705
114,338
118,971
123,604
128,237
132,871
137,504
142, 137
146,no
151,403
156,036
160,669
165,302
169,936
174,569
179,202
183,835
188,468
193, 101
197,734
202,367
202,371
106,084
106,084
106,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
168,084
19,545
14,912
10,278
5,645
63,012
58,379
53,746
49,113
44,480
39,847
35,213
30,580
25,947
21,314
16,681
12,048
7,415
2,782
(1,852)
(6,485)
(11,118)
(15,751)
(20,384)
(25,017)
(29,650)
(34,283)
(34,287)
NOTES: (1) PHASE 11 OF THE SAFETY CENTER (+APPROX. 62000 SQ. FT.)
232
235
238
243
245
247
249
251
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
252
573
581
588
600
605
610
615
620
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
623
860
871
882
901
908
916
923
930
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
934
CITYWIDE DEMAND
0.99X
0.96X
0.92X
0.90X
0.86X
0.83X
0.81X
0.78X
0.76X
0.73X
0.70X
0.68X
0.66X
0.64X
0.62X
0.60X
0.58X
0.57X
0.55X
0.54X
0.52X
0.51X
0.50X
0.48X
0.47X
0.46X
0.46X
These projections were based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments
(SANDAG) projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and
the Public Facilities Management Systems, Monitoring Report of April, 1986.
m >< :::c
CD
-I
:::c
Currently, Zone 3 has 231 dwelling units which generates a
856 square footage demand for City Administrative Facilities. As
of January 1, 1987, the existing Citywide demand for City
Administrative Facilities was 86 539 square feet of which the
demand for Zone 3 is included. Zone 3 has the potential to
create an addition~! 79 square feet of demand
C. Adequacy Findings
City Administrative Facilities based upon the projected
phasing of Citywide development and that of Zone 3, will conform
with the adopted standard until the year 2005. The following
Exhibit I, "City Administrative Facilities", on Page 43 shows the
existing and committed facilities, projected Citywide demand, and
Zone 3's phased demand.
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 3
No special conditions are necessary at this time
B. Financing
Public Facilities Fees are continuing to be collected
Citywide and in Zone 3. Future residential development will
create a relatively small demand for City Administrative
Facilities (79 sq. ft. of additional demand at buildout)
therefore, it is assumed that the minimal proportionate share
required of this zone will be financed by Public Facilities Fees
paid by future Zone 3 development. In other words no other
financing mechanism will be required as a condition of
development relative to adequate City Administrative Facilities.
42
CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
ZONE 3
220
200 EXISTING FACILITIES
180 168,084 ~. 168,084 168,084 (/) w
f-160 _J
u <( 140 lJ..
2 0,,-.... 120 <( -2
>-C PROJECTED CITYWIDE DEMAND
f-0 100 m -(/) X ,I= u :::J :c w 0 -l.c OJ f-80 -f-'--" -I w w
lJ.. 60
w
0::
<( 40 =i ZONE 3 DEMANDS
0
(/)
93~
20
901 934 934 934
0
-20
1990 1995 2000 2005 2013
.... YEARS .... --00 .....
44
LIBRARY
ZONE 3
■ 1.18RAAll!S-l!XISTING
D UIRARll!S-PLANNl!O
ZONE 3
I
\ ' ' .... ......... ..... ' '
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
45
\ I I
LIBRARY
e.1., *c..,,,... o, •• , ................. _.
~-~ ::: ~--'· I '
I \ AMENDED
~OVEMBER 198 7
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
SUMMARY SHEET
LIBRARY
BUILD OUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ccnomww:e MITIGATION FUNDING w/Stlriiard)
46,154
EXISTING 31,500 YES(1) ------
SQ. FT. 457
APPROVED 58,509 72,60
N0(2) ------
SQ. FT. (3) (!)
z -() 0
(,J)
< :c 107,931 a.
FUTURE ------------
SQ. FT.
627
Notes:
(1) Based upon action of the City Council on 7/7/87 to schedule and
finance the construction of additional L1braiy space, the
adopted performance standard is being complied with.
(2) By the year 2003, there could be a shortage of Library
facilities.
(3) For year 1992.
46 11/87
LIBRARY
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
800 square feet per 1,000 population of Library must be
scheduled for construction within a five year period.
II. FACILITY PLANHINt AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
This analysis determines whether or not the performance
standard is being met and, if the facility demand from Zone 3 is
consistent with the analysis of the adoptea Citywide Facilities
and Improvements Plan (CC Reso 8797) for Library Facilities.
A.
Existirg
as of
Inventory
1. Facilitv Demand
(Citywide/Zone 3)
(1-87/1-87)
Ultimate Builoout (Citywide/Zone 3)
as of (2013/2013)
Poµ.tlation
Pro,iections
57,693/571
134,914/623
2. Existing Library Facilities*:
Olw1ff1 Leased
Library Facilities (As of 1/1/87) Sq.Ft. Sq. Ft.
Civic Center Library (1200 Elm Ave) 24,600
Adult Leaming Center (1207 Elm Ave) 400
La Costa Area Library (7750 El Ccfllino Real) 4,S(X)lH-
Wa:t'ffiOlJre 2,(XX)
Total 24,600 6,900
(% of Space) (78Xi) (22\'i)
Rf:qllirro
~ Footaqe
L!6, 154/457
107 ,931/498
Total
Sq. Ft.
31,500
( 100;~)
* Source -Citywide Fceilities crd Improvenents Plan (CC Reso
8797)
¼-If-The La Costa Area Library lease will terntlnate wien the rew S::llrt:h
Carlsi:)aj Library is ronstructed.
47 11/87
3. Phased library Facilities:
A) The City's Five Year Capital Improvement Program:
The City's adopted Five Year C.I.P. for fiscal years 1986-
91 includes $650,000 for the design of a main South Carlsbad
Library.
B) Other information
On July 7, 1987 the City Council took three actions to
provide for the South Carlsbad library. They were:
1. Approved the recommended South Carlsbad Library site
within Zone 6 (portion of N-RM-1) and directed the
City Manager to negotiate purchase agreement with the
owner.
2. Directed the City Manager to include funds in the CIP
for land acquisition and construction of the South
Carlsbad library.
3. Directed the City Manager
methods of financing and
Carlsbad library.
to evaluate alternative
constructing the South
These actions are incorporated into the 1987-92 CIP. At this
time the following time and cost schedules have been developed:
Description
land Acquisition
Grading
Design
Construction
CIP
Fiscal Year
1988-89
1988-89
1988-89
89-90 to 90-91
Estimated Costs
In 1987 Dollars
$ 1. 1 Mil
.9 Mil
.6 Mil
8.4 Mil
$11.0 Mil
The South Carlsbad library will involve building a sa,noo square
foot facility of which 48,000 square feet will be occupied for
library use in 1991. The additional 10,000 square feet will be
leased out by the City until it is needed. It is projected
this additional 10,000 square feet of space would be needed in
2002 based on the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plans
phasing assumptions. ·
The following summarizes existing and phased library Facilities
which serve to meet the performance standard for the years 1987-
2013.
48 11/87
Existing Library Facilities:
Owned Leased Total
Civic Center Library (1200 Elm Ave)
Adult Learning Center (1207 Elm Ave)
La Costa Area Library (7750 El Camino
Warehouse
Real)
Sq. Ft.
24,600
Sq. Ft Sq. Ft.
400
4,500
2,000
Total 24,600 6,900 31,500
(% of Space} (78%)
Approved Phased Library Facilities: 1987-92:
Phase in -1992
South Carlsbad Library (Phase I) 48,000
Phase out -'1992
Adult Learning Center (1207 Elm Avenue)
La Costa Area Library (7750 El Camino Rd)
Warehouse
Total Library space that meets
Performance Standard for years
1987-1991 72,600
(% of Space) (100%)
Phase-in -1999 to 2002
South Carlsbad library (Phase II) 10,000
Total 82,600
(% of Space) (100%)
B. Phasing
(22%)
400
4,500
2,000
6,900
(0%)
0
0
(0%)
(100%)
72,600
( 100%)
10,000
82,600
( 100%)
For the phasing of Library Facilities Zone 3 and Citywide
population projections are based on Exhibit G: "Citywide and
Zone 3 Residential Phasing Schedules" on Page 40.
From
facilities
this Plan
population
would also
standard is
these population projections rlemands for library
has been assessed. As stated in Part IV "Phasing" of
the exact phasing of dwelling units and subsequent
may vary. Consequently public facility-improvements
vary to continually assure the adopted performance
maintained.
Exhibit J: "Zone 3 Residential Phasing nf Llhrary
Facilities" on Page 50, projects the phased demand and supply of
Library facilities consistent with the adopted Citywide
facilities and Improvements Plan (CC Reso 8797) and recent City
Council action. Exhibit K, on Page 52 charts existing and
committed Library Facilities supply along with phased Citywide
and Zone 3 Library 'Facilities demand.
49 11/87
CITYWIDE AND ZONE 3 • PHASING OF LIBRARY FACILITIES * PLANNING PROJECTIONS ONLY•
CITYWIDE ( 1) ZONE 3 (2)
----------------------
------------------------------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------STATUS NOTES AS OF D.U.'S POP. SQ. FT. OF CONFORMANCE/ I D.U.'S POP SQ. FT. OF ZONE 3'S X
JAN 1 (2.471/DU) DEMAND SUPPLY (NON-CONFORMANCE) DEMAND OF THE TOTAL
CITYWIDE DEMAND
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXISTING (3) 1987 23,348 57,693 46,154 31,500 (14,654) 232 573 459 0.99X
PROJECTED (3) 1988 24,598 60,782 48,625 31,500 (17. 125) 235 581 465 0.96X
(3) 1989 25,848 63,870 51,096 31,500 (19,596) 238 588 470 0.92"
(3) 1990 27,098 66,959 53,567 31,500 (22,067) 243 600 480 0.90X
(4) 1991 28,348 70,048 56,038 31,500 (24,538) 245 605 484 0.86X
1992 29,598 73, 137 58,509 n,600 14,091 247 610 488 0.83X
1993 30,848 76,225 60,980 n,600 11,620 249 615 492 0.81X
1994 32,098 79,314 63,451 n,600 9,149 251 620 496 0.78X
1995 33,348 82,403 65,922 72,600 6,678 252 623 498 0.76X m u,
1996 I 34,598 85,492 68,393 72,600 4,207 252 623 498 0.73X X 0 (5) 1997 35,848 88,580 70,864 82,600 11,736 252 623 498 0.70X :::c
19981 37,098 91,669 73,335 82,600 9,265 252 623 498 0.68X DJ 1999 38,348 94,758 75,806 82,600 6,794 252 623 498 0.66X -2000 39,598 97,847 78,277 82,600 4,323 I 252 623 498 0.64X -t
2001 40,848 100,935 80,748 82,600 1,852 252 623 498 0.62" '-2002 42,098 104,024 83,219 82,600 (619)1 252 623 498 0.60X
2003 43,348 107, 113 85,690 82,600 (3,090) 252 623 498 0.58"
2004 44,598 110,202 88,161 82,600 (5,561) 252 623 498 0.57"
2005 45,848 113,290 90,632 82,600 (8,032) 252 623 498 0.55X
2006 47,098 116,379 93,103 82,600 (10,503) 252 623 498 0.54X
2007 48,348 119,468 95,574 82,600 (12,974) 252 623 498 0.52X
2008 49,598 122,557 98,045 82,600 (15,445) 252 623 498 0.51X
2009 50,848 125,645 100,516 82,600 (17,916) 252 623 498 0.50X
2010 52,098 128,734 102,987 82,600 (20,387) 252 623 498 0.48X
2011 53,348 131,823 105,458 82,600 (22,858) 252 623 498 0.47"
2012 54,598 134,912 107,929 82,600 (25,329) 252 623 498 0.46X
BUILDOUT 2013 54,599 134,914 107,931 82,600 (25,331) 252 623 498 0.46X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES: (1) FROM CITYWIDE FACITILITES AND IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (CC Reso 8797)
(2) FROM ZONE 3 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN .. (3) BASED UPON ACTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ON 7/7/87 TO SCHEDULE AND FINANCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SOUTH .. CARLSBAD LIBRARY, THE ADOPTED PERFORMANCE STANDARD IS BEING COMPLIED WITH UNYIL 1992 • -(4) SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY PHASE I AND DELETION OF LEASED SPACE. co .... (5) SOUTH CARLSBAD LIBRARY PHASE II
C. Adequacy Findings
The City Council, on July 7, 1987, earmarked funds for
site acquisition and construction of a 58,000 square foot
facility to be built by 1992. 48,000 square feet is expected to
be leased out by the City until needed. This action brings
Library Facilities into compliance with the performance
standard.
It is projected the 48,000 square feet of additional space
will enable the City to comply with the Library Performance
Standard until the year 2002.
III. MITIGATION
A. Special Conditions for Zone 3
1. No conditions are necessary for the purchase of Library
facilities in Zone 3 because the City Council has taken
action to provide needed Library Facilities in
accordance with the adopted performance standard. This
action included:
a. Approving a preferred South Carlsbad Library site.
b. Directing the City Manager to negotiate an agreement
to acquire the site.
c. Earmarking funds to guarantee the financing needed
for site acquisition and construction of a 58,000
square foot Library facility.
d. Providing for construction to be completed by 1991
(within 5 years).
2. Once the design of South Carlsbad Library is approved by
the City, the City shall in the next yearly review of
this plan make adjustments to the land use and public
facility demands from Zone 3 to reflect the addition of
the Library and deletion of potential residential
dev.elopment.
B. Financing
The City Council on July 7, 1987 took action to earmark
sufficient funds to acquire the site and to construct a 58,000
square foot South Carlsbad Library. The City Council has
guaranteed the necessary funds to accom·plish th is project,
although the specific long-term financing mechanism has not been
determined.
The City currently collects a Public Facility Fee (PFF)
which is set at 3.5% of permit valuation. This fee is applied
at the time of building permit issuance.
51 11/87
LIBRARY
ZONE 3
130
120
110 107,931
100
>--90
(r
<(
80 (r 82,600 82,600 (D
:J Ul 70 I -g m X
I-0 60 :z:
U1 w {/) a, N w :J -Li... 0 -i .r: 50 wt, " (r
<( 40 ::J
0
(/) 30 31,500
20
10
0
480 498 498 498 498
-10
1990 1995 2000 2005 2013
YEARS
53
WASTEWATER
ZONE 3
~
EN CINA
WASTE WATER
TREATMENT
FACILITY
t
ZONE 3
WASTE '"WATER TREATMENT
C.lyatC.W, ....
I
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN I I ' AMENneo
NOVEMBER 1sa1
54
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
SUMMARY SHEET
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
BUILD OUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Carionnrce MITIGATION FUNDING wlStrdard)
EXISTING 4.7
See Page See Page
5.7 NO 59 59
MGO a
6.6d
APPROVED 8.6b,d YES N/A N/A
MCD C, z ----Cl)
<
J: 7.7c Q.
.FUTURE 8.6c,d YES N/A N/A
MGD ---
a. Buildout assumptions are for the entire sewer service area which
includes Zone 3. The following analysis of a Citywide facility,
therefore, focuses on the entire sewer service area, and not just.
on Zone 3. ·
b. Assumes Phase IV expansion of Encina.
c. Oemand and Supply, as of 1995.
d. Demand and Supply, as of 1991.
55 11/87
WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Sewer plant capacity is adequate for at least a five year
period.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Sewer service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three
separate and independent agencies, Leucadia County Water
District, San Marcos County Water District, and the City of
Carlsbad.
Sewer service for Zone 3 is provided entirely by the City
of Carlsbad.
1. Buildout Assumptions (Carlsbad Sewer Service Area):
Wastewater Treatment Demands
Carlsbad
Population
Current Buildout
40,356 95,669
* EDU -Equivalent Dwelling Units
EDU*
Current Buildout
21,354 47,800
MGD**
Current"" Buildout
4.7 11.8
** MGD -Million Gallons per Day -Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF)
2. Existing Facilities
The City of Carlsbad has capacity available at two
treatment plant facilities. Secondary treatment capacity is
provided through the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility
(WPCF) which is a regional facility owned by six member agencies.
The current rated capacity of the plant is 22.5 MGD of which
Carlsbad retains ownership of 25.4 percent (5.7 MGD).
The City of Carlsbad also holds title to the Calavera
Hills Treatment Plant which has a capacity of 1.2 MGD. The
Calavera Facility is not operational at this time and will
require the expenditure of $1.1 to $1.5 million to make it
functional. Operation of the Calavera Hills Plant is estimated
to cost $360,000 per year. Comparable treatment at the Encina
WPCF is estimated at $135,000 per year. The Calavera Hills Plant
is not economical to operate for treatment capacity except in the
absence of needed capacity at Encina.
56 11/87
3. Facilities in the City's Five Year Capital
Improvements Program:
The adopted CIP includes two items which will be financed
from the sewer fund which affect wastewater treatment capacity:
B.
a. Encina WPCF -Phase IV expansion, scheduled to begin
in 1989, and completed in 1991 -$6,500,000
Carlsbad's share of this facility is 2.9 MCD.
b. Calavera Hills $2,000,000 for 1986-87 and the
1990-91 Fiscal Years. Construction to be phased to
correspond to capacity needs.
Phasing and Service Demand
Based on data maintained by the City Development
Processing Services Department, on March 31, 1987, 22,965 EDU's
had been permitted by the City. Utilizing 246 GPO per EDU and
the adopted 3% vacancy factor, 985 EDU's of capacity remain to be
issued prior to reaching Carlsbad's share of capacity at the
Encina WPCF. The Citywide Facilities Management Plan is based on
phased growth of 1,250 dwelling units per year plus non-
residential development. Using a similar phasing for the portion
of the City within the Carlsbad Sewer Service Area an annual
growth rate of 1,143 EDU's per year (905 residential EDU's and
238 non-residential EDU's) is projected. This phasing would
indicate that Carlsbad's wastewater treatment allocation could be
exceeded within a year.
Staff has just completed an analysis of Carlsbad's
wastewater flows to Encina WPCF to determine the actual flow
value of an EDU. As of March 30, 1987, 21,354 equivalent
dwelling units (EDU's) were connected and being billed by the
City for sewer service. Flow corresponding to these EDU's has
been measured at 4.69 MCD. That flow divided by the currently
billed EOU's yields an actual flow rate of 220 gallons per day
(GPO} per EDU. However, for planning purposes the City of
Carlsbad has adopted a flow rate of 246 GPO per EDU. Evaluation
of available capacity varies signific~ntly depending on the value
of flow per EDU utilized. As can be seen from Table 1 on Page
52, utilizing 220 GPO per EDU, treatment capacity at Encina WPCF
would be available until 1990 with plant expansion expected to be
completed in 1991.
C. Adequacy Findings
Based on analysis of existing flow data and a range of
projections it ls likely that current treatment capacity will be
reached between 1988 and 1990, and that additional interim
capacity will be required to meet the performance standard.
Options exist to provide interim treatment capacity which would
allow the Zone as well as the City's Sewer Service Area to meet
57
11/87
U'I
00
... ... -00 .....
ill!
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
TABLE 1
CARLSBAD SERVICE AREA DEMAND
AND
AVAILABLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY
FLOW PROJECTIONS 1
EQUIVALENT DWELLING FLOW a 220 FLOW iii 246
UNITS CEDU'S) GAL/EDU (MGD)2 GAL/EDU CMGD) ENCINA CMGD)
21,354 4.69 5.25 5. 71
23,3843 5.14 5. 75 5. 71
24,492 5.40 6.03 5.71
25,600 5.63 6.29 5. 71
26,708 5.87 6.57 8.57
27,816 6.12 6.84 8.57
28,924 6.36 7 .12 8.57
30,032 6.60 7.38 8.57
31, 140 6.85 7.66 8.57
TREATMENT CAPACITY
LAKE CALAVERA
HILLS CMGD) TOTAL CMGD)
0.0 5. 71
0.6 6.31
0.7 6.41
0.7 6.41
0.0 8.57
o.o 8.57
0.0 8.57
0.0 8.57
0.0 8.57
1 NOTE: 1989 to 1995 EDU's are expanded 1,143 per year. This repres~nts 905 dwelling units and 238 EDU's of
commercial and Industrial. (428,400 sq. ft. at 1,800 sq. ft. per EDU.) Each year is projected to
July 1 to correspond to fiscal year budgeting and adjusted for a 3X vacancy •
2 MGD • Millions of Gallons Per Day
3 1988 EDU 1s • 22,965 EDU 1S issued 3-31-87 + 1,143 per Note 1 adjusted for 3X vacancy
(22,965 + 1,143) X 0.97 • 23,384
performance standard. These alternatives are incorporated into
conditions outlined in the following the proposed special
Mitigation section.
III.
A.
B.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 3
1. The following actions shall be pursued by the City to
ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity
throughout a five (5) year period:
a. Monitor Encina Treatment Plant flows on a
monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and
to have an early warning of capacity problems.
b. Actively pursue acceleration and phasing of
treatment plant Phase IV expansion to provide
adequate capacity.
c. When Carlsbad's share of Encina flows reach 5.25
MGD, actively seek leased capacity from other
Encina agencies.
d. When Carlsbad Encina flows reach 5.45 MGO,
proceed to activation of the Calavera Hills
Reclamation/Treatment Facility. Plant to be
activated when more cost effective treatment
measures are no longer feasible and Carlsbad
capacity at Encina has been reached.
Financing
Sewer connection fees provide the primary source of
funding fot both sewer line upgrades and expansion of treatment
plant capacity. The timing of sewer facilities upgrades and the
mechanism of financing are critical to analysis of the adequacy
of funding for plant expansion. A complete financial and cash
flow analysis should be conducted in conjunction w~th the
Citywide Sewer Master Plan update. This analysis will provide a
basis to evaluate development phasing within sewer basins and
each Growth Management Zone. Priority for funding should be
given to wastewater treatment capacity.
59 11/87
60
PARKS
2
ZONE 3
ZONE 3
Park District Boundarie~
I 10 l
cu,o1c.111aa a,.,.,,. Menlgeffl ... PrOc,' ....
5 NOVEMBER 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
61
ZONE 3
COMMUNITY PARKS
□ EXISTING
• FUTURE
* SPECIAL USE AREA
ZONE 3
CALAVERA HILLS
---r-------... :-;l I
I ' I I 10
\ \ ',, . ........ .... ' ' \ I I
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
62
\~ ,. ,g. ,~
I
I 1t
' I
PARKS
c:.1-,0,c ......
llro•rtl~~ .... $;11 -~ t
' '
AMENDED
NOVEMBER 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
SUMMARY SHEET
PARKS
PARK DISTRICT 1•
BUILDOUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Cc:normrce MITIGATION FUNDING w/Stsiclard)
EXISTING 69.15
79.2 YES N/A N/A
1.7
78.32
APPROVED 79.2 YES N/A N/A
(!) 0 z -(I)
< 118.44 ::i::: a.
.FUTURE 79.2* NO ------
. 16
* Zone 3 is located in two Park Districts, 1 and 3. However, there
are no residential units in Park District 3, therefore, no
analysis is necessary in the local plan. ·
** Based u~on the projected phasing for Park District 1, the standard
will not be met in 1990. At that time, or prior to 1990
additional park acreage will be necessary.
63 11/87
PARKS
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per
1,000 population within a park district, must be scheduled for
construction within a 5-year period.
Special Considerations
The Citywide Plan divides the City into four park
districts which are the same as the four City quadrants.· Zone 3
is located within the following two park districts: Park
District 1 (NW Quadrant) and Park District 3 (SW Quadrant). Park
District 3 will not be analyzed with regard to lone 3, because
there will be no real impacts from Zone 3. This is due to the
fact that no resid~ntial units from Zone 3 will be located in the
SW Quadrant. Non-residential land uses do not impact parks under
the provisions· of the Growth Management Ordinance. Therefore,
the analysis below will focus only on Park District 1.
The parks listed under existing inventory for Park
District 1 reflect the park standards in effect at the time this
area was developed and may not reflect the new Park and
Recreation standards adopted in 1981. It would be difficult to
apply the new Parks and Recreation Standards for community parks
to this quadrant because Park District 1 ls largely developed and
there are no remaining parcels over 200 acres (the minimum
standard or dedication) as required in the City's Park and
Recreation Element. Therefore, future community parks of 20
acres or more are not likely to be developed in Park Oistrict 1 •
.
Park District 3 will not be specifically analyzed in the
hody of this analysis, although there are two areas which need to
be discussed here. The first, deals with the issue of Alta Mira
Community Park. This acreage was counted as useable park land in
the Citywide Plan but will not be fully developable due to its
steep slopes The future useabllity of Alta Mira Park will need
to be addressed as these local plans are reviewed. The second
area deals with current park standards. Future park lands
dedicated in Park D strict 3 will he required to meet existing
standards.
PARK DISTRICT 1
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or
not the park demand for Zone 3 complies with the adopted
performance standard.
64
A. Inventory
Existing Facilities
Community Parks (Developed)
Holiday
Ownership
City Active
Natural/Passive
Active
Acres
5.4
27.0
6.8
3.0
Hosp Grove City
Laquna Riviera City
Magee City Active
Total Developed 42.2
Special Use Areas Ownership ~ Acres
Buena Vista CUSD Active 2.3
Cannon Park SOC&E Active 1. 7
Car Country City Passive 1.0
Chase Field City Active 2.3
CHS Tennis Courts cuso Active 3.0
Harding Community Center City Convnunity Center 1.0
Jefferson Elementary cuso Active 2.6
Kelly Eleme.ntary cuso Active 2.8
Magnolia cuso Active 4.2
Maxton Brown City Passive 1.4
Oak City Passive 0.4
Pine Elementary CUSD Active 2.0
Pio Pico City Passive 0.8
Rotary City ·Passive 1.0
Swim Complex City Active 3.0
Valley Jr. High School CUSD Active 7.5
Total 37.0
CUSO -Carlsbad Unified School District
Proposed Future Facilities
Ownership Type Acres
Cannon Lake City Active 6.7
Pine School CUSD Active 7.0
Macario City Active 25.0
Pine Jr. Center CUSD Convnunity Center 3.0
(All facilities owned by CUSO have a one year joint-use agreements, renewable
yearly with a 60 day cancellation clause which may be initiated by either
party. The SDG&E Special Use Area originally had a 10 year lease which
expired on May 31, 1973; however, the lease also provided for an automatic
yearly renewal which is still in effect.)
65 11/87
B. Phasing
1 -. Buildout Assumetfons (1/1/87)
Population
Park District 1 Current 23,049
Buildout 39,479
Zone 3 Current 571
Buildout 623
2. Park Demand (Park District 1)
Required Acres
69.15
118.44
1. 71
1.87
Listed below is the demand for parks generated by resi-
dential development in Park District 1. Demand was determined by
using the following formula:
Yearly Dwelling Units x 2.471 = Population
Population x Park Standard= Park Demand (by year)
Supply is determined by analyzing existing parks and any
parks scheduled for construction. This is compared with the
demand to determine if the performance standard is being met.
EXHIBIT L
P L A N N I N G P R O J E C T I O N S O N L Y
PARK DISTRICT 1
PROJECTED PARK DEMAND -V-PARK SUPPLY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------YEAR DWELLING TOTAL POP. TOTAL PARKS TOTAL CONFORMS/
UNITS DWELLING POP. DEMAND SUPPLY (NON-
UNITS CONFORMING)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/1/87 9,328 9,328 23,049 23,049 69.15 79.20 10.05
1987 539 9,867 1,332 24,381 73.14 79.20 6.06
1988 308 10,175 761 25,142 75.43 79.20 3.77
1989 355 10,530 877 26,020 78.06 79.20 1.14
1990 192 10,722 474 26,494 79.48 79.20 (0.28)
1991 188 10,910 465 26,959 80.88 79.20 (1.68)
1992 227 11,137 561 27,520 82. 56 . 79.20 (3.36)
1993 167 11,304 413 27,932 83.80 79.20 ( 4. 60)
1994 303 11,607 749 28,681 86.04 79.20 (6.84)
1995 156 11,763 385 29,066 87.20 79.20 (8.00)
66
.3 • Park Demand (Zone .3 Only)
Listed below ls the demand for parks generated
specifically by residential development in Zone 3 and not the
entire quadrant. Information must be generated from each zone
before the whole quadrant can be analyzed. Demand for Zone 3 was
reached by using the following formula:
Yearly Dwelling Units x 2.471 = Population
Population x Park Standard= Park Demand (by year)
EXHIBIT M
PARK DISTRICT 1 -PROJECTED PARKS DEMAND
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE 3
YEAR
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
DWELLING TOTAL
UNITS DWELLING
UNITS
232 232
3 235
3 238
5 243
2 245
2 247
2 249
2 251
1 252
67
POP.
573
7
7
12
5
5
5
5
2
TOTAL
POP.
573
581
588
600
605
610
615
620
623
TOTAL
PARKS
DEMAND
1.72
1.74
1.76
1.80
1.82
1.83
1.85
1.86
1.87
4. Evaluation of Zone 3 within Park District 1
Listed below are the demand and supply of existing park
acreage.
Existing Acres
Community Parks
Special Use Areas
42.2
37.0
79.2
69.15
10.05
Acres Required
Total
Surplus
Currently, in Park District 1 a surplus of 10.05 park acres
exists. Based on phasing, it is anticipated that in 1990 an
additional .28 acres of park will be neeoed to meet the auadrant
demand. At that time, funding must bP. approved for construction
of additional park acreage in Park District 1 within five years
(See Financing Section).
C. Adequacy Findings
Park District 1 currently conforms with the adopted
performance standard and will continue to do so until 1990. At
that time, or in advance of 1990, additional park acreage will be
needed or development will be stopped in Park nistrict 1.
III. MITIGATIOU
Currently, Park District 1 conforms with the adopted
performance standard and needs no mitigation, although it is
projected that a shortage will occur in 1990.
Zone 3 is projected to phase its residen~ial development
through 1995. Given this phasing, in 1990 Zone 3's residential
development would be stopped until additional park acreage is
added in the City's CIP or until another zone(s) solved this
shortage.
It is important
(January 1987) has
development of Zone 3 to
in-lieu fees. Phased
District 1 would add
totaling $1,020,300.
to note that Park District 1 currently
$680,743 in park-in-lieu fees. Phased
1990 would add approximately $9,000 park-
rlevelopment of the other zones in Park
another $1,010,i,OO in park-in-lieu fees,
The collected park-in-lieu fees supplemented with PFF fees
could be used to either develop Cannon Lake Park (6.7 ac) or to
construct a sµecial use area that would bring oar~s into
conformance with the performance standard, or some other option.
At this time, no specific mitigation is required and,
therefore, no recommendation is provided.
68 11/87
A. Special Conditions for Zone 3
There are no conditions necessary at this time because
park facilities in Park District 1 meet the adopted performance
standards. All development shall pay Park-in-Lieu fees and
Public Facility Fees for Park District 1. No residential
development will be allowed after 1990 unless actions have been
taken to construct additiona~ park facilities. No conditions are
needed for Park District 3 because Zone 3 has no residential
units in that district and, therefore, has no impact.
8. Financing
Public Facility Fees and Park-in-Lieu Fees are continuing
to be collected and no additional financing plan is needed at
this time. Development will be monitored and when it appears
that park acreage could fall below the standard, the City Council
will have to consider options to increase developed park
acreage.
69 11/87
70
DRAINAGE
....
.._
co ....
;·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· i . I
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3 DRAINAGE
~ EXISTING STORM DRAINS & SIZE
PROPOSED STORM DRAINS & SIZE
r------:, -OPEN CHANNEL
CONCRETE LINED CHANNEL
CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
0
3 e •
----
ZONE 4
I
I .
I
I .....
C.tv OI Cat1:1bad
NOVEMBER . t 9 e 7
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
SUMMARY SHEET
DRAINAGE
BUILD OUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ccrlonnrce w/StSlderd) MITIGATION FUNDING
EXISTING
* * YES N/A N/A
APPROVED ------YES N/A N/A
C, z -en
c(
:I:
Q.
FUTURE ------YES YES** YES**
* Specific drainage facilities will be required as individual
projects are·approved in Zone 3.
.
** A 24~ RCP required in Cannon Road from Pase~ Del Norte to Cannon
Lake. A 2,4" RCP will also be required under AT & SF Railroad.
Both improvements iill be required with development of the Car
Country Expansion Area.
72 11/87
DRAINACE
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the
City concurrent with development.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
As was indicated in the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, drainage is distinguished from all other
public facilities and improvements because by its very nature it
is more accurately assessed as specific development plans are
finalized. However, certain facilities may be necessary which
are larger than those required from a single development project
and, therefore, need to be identified so that the proper funding
can be collected for the construction of these facilities.
A. Inventory
The City's Master Drainaqe Plan, completed in March, 1980,
does not identify major drainage facilities within Zone 3. The
Master Drainage Plan is currently ~eing revised; preliminary
research indicates that an RCP will be required in C~nnon Road
to serve the north end of the Car Country expansion. A 24" RCP
under the AT & SF Kailroad will also be required to serve the
south end of the Car Country expansion.
1. Existing Faciliti~s
Existing storm drains are shown on map "Drainage" on Page
70 with portions draining overland throuqh course that have been
designdted as open space areas on the r.eneral Plan. The largest
sub-basin within this Zone drains gPnerally on a northerly
direction to the Agua Hedionda Lagoon. The other smaller suh-
basins along the coast and south of Palomar Airport Road drain
westerly to the Pacific Ocean.
2. Builnout Assumptions
Future development within Zone 3 will consist of the
following:
Budget.
Commercial
Industrial
Residential
4-6.9 Acres
11.3 Acres
21 Units
3. Facilities in the Five Year Capital Facilities
Progr-am:
TherP. are no improvements scheduled in the current C.I.P.
73 11/87
B. Phasing
Since the demand for future drainage facilities within
Zone 3 will be localized and generated by specific development,
it will be addressed as that development occurs.
There is no significant drainage impact from development
outside of Zone 3. Canyon De Las Encinas, a major water course
parallel to Palomar Airport Road, crosses Zone 3 at its
southerly end and has been identified as an ~pen space area with
no improvements required within the 100 Year Flood Boundary.
C. Adequacy Findings
Existing facilities conform with the adopted performance
standard. A 24" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) in Cannon Road
and a 24" RCP under the AT & SF Railroad will be required with
the expansion of Car Country.
III.
A.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 3
Draina~e facilities shall be provided at the time of
development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
B. Financing
Drainage improvements shall be financed by the developer.
74 11/87
75
CIRCULATION
CIRCULATION ELEMENT-ROADS AND INTERSECTIONS
_______________ ll~ ~s==--:~-=.~ ... ~,~;.i==-i~-=..-_-_-_-_-_-_~~~~=========~~--_,
.,.,!'-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·~·~1~~--~-, ... :•""'
A" Nil"" 1-------===========::_------:-.-:--, -=-,-,-,~,,.......-,----------7' ·-•-.----------------------11---------------~---'---------~ \ .
\
ZONl 1 I
I
Q PFF TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN -ZONE 3
-I
I -------------------:-: ... ,
FUTURE ALIGNMENT
ZONE 22
t¥1¥~ ~
I \
' NOVEMBER 196 ·
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
SUMMARY SHEET
CIRCULATION
BUILD OUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ccnomw1:• w/Stirdard) MIT/GA TION FUNDING
EXISTING
APPROVED
FUTURE
*
**
***
See
* * YES Page 81
See
** ** NO Page 81
(!) z -(/)
c(
:c. a. See
*** *** YES Page 81
All intersections are currently in conformance with the
adopted perf~rmance standard.
See
Page 86
See
Page 86
See
Page 86
Three impacted road segments or intersections are non-conforming
at traffic levels generated with existing plus approved projects.
(See Page 78). · ·
Zone 3's buildout is so minimal that the buildout Circulation
Element will mitigate traffic impacts to performance standard
levels.
77 11/87
CIRCULATION
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
No road segment or intersection in the zone nor any road
segment or intersection out of the zone which ls impacted by
development in the zone shall be projected to ~xceed a service
level C during off-peak hours, nor service level D during peak
hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the
traffic generated by the Local Facility Management Zone will use
the road segment or intersection.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
The purpose of this analysis is to determine whether or
not the circulation system within Zone 3 conforms to the adopted
performance standards for Zone 3. It will also address all
Circulation Element Roads and Intersections outside of Zone 3
impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by
Zone 3 to ensure conformance with the adopted performance
sta11dard.
A. Inventory
The following Circulation Element Roads and intersections
are located in Zon~ 3. See "Circulation Element Roads and
Intersections" on Page 76.
Roads
1. Palomar Airport Road -Prime Arterial -126' Right-of-
Way
2. Carlsbad Boulevard/Cannon Road -Major Arterial -102'
Right-of-Way
3. Paseo del Norte/Avenida Encinas -Secondary Arterial
-84' Right-of-Way
Intersections
1. Cannon Road and Paseo del Norte
2. Cannon Road and I-5
3. Cannon Road and Avenida Encinas
4. Cannon Road and Carlsbad Boulevard
5. Carlsbad Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road
6. Palomar Airport Road and Avenlda Encinas
7. Palomar Airport Road and I-5
8. Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte
78
Existing Conditions
The existing conditions of these road segments and
intersections all comply with the adopted performance standard.
B. Phasing
This analysis considers all of the existing traffic which
flows through road segments or intersections which are impacted by
the Car Country Expansion of Zone 3 as well as projecting the
future traffic generated by projects which have received
discretionary approvals. At this level of analysis the following
impacted road segments and intersections fall below and do not
conform with the adopted performance standard if additional
improvements are not constructed.
Existing Existing plus Committed
A.H. P.M. A.H. P.M.
Peak Peak Peak Peak
Northbound I-5 at
Palomar Airport Rd. C C F F
Southbound I-5 at
Palomar Airport Rd. C C F F
Palomar Airport Rd.
at Paseo del Norte A C D F
Existing levels of service are based on actual traffic counts
at these intersections. The existing plus committed levels of
service take the existing traffic counts and project the trips
which will be generated from those committed or approved projects
and the Car Country Expansion to Zone 3.
The I-5 southbound off-ramp to Palomar Airport Road
currently operates at LOS D during a portion of the morning peak
hour, however, the duration of this LOS Dis approximately for
one-third of the 7:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. peak hour. Between 7:30
and 7:40 the delay on the off-ramp does not exceed 90 seconds, an
average delay; during the time from 7:40 a.m •• to 8:00 a.m., some
delays up to three minutes were recorded, but average delays
generally do not exceed two minutes. After 8:00 a.m., to 8:30
a.m., average delays were generally no more than thirty seconds in
length. Also, during the morning peak hour,. the free-flowing
traffic on Palomar Airport Road experiences no delay and ls
considered to operate at LOS A.
79 11/87
The I-5 northbound off-ramp traffic also experiences a LOS
D during approximately one-third of the morning peak hour.
Although delays up to two minutes were recorded during the twenty
minute period.· The average delay during the remainder of the
peak hour ~as approximately thi~ty seconds. The free-flowing
traffic on Palomar Airport Road (without stop signs) experienced
no delay and is considered to operate at LOS A.
Since the off ramp traffic contributes approximately one
third of the total traffic at the ramp intersections, and the LOS
D is experienced by the off ramp traffic for only one thir1 of
the peak hour, the combined traffic is considered to operate at
LOS C during the morning peak hour at these ramp intersections.
The afternoon peak hour level of service at these ramp
intersections is similar to the morninq peak hour, i.e. the
duration of the LOS D for the ramp traffic is only about one
third of the peak hour, while the east-west traffic on Palomar
Airport Road flows at LOS A. Therefore, the ramp intersections
are considered to operate at LOS C for the total peak hour
traffic.
The Zone 3 Circulation section has not been phased on a
yearly basis which will be con~istcnt with the plans for Zones 1
through 6. They were not phased on a yearly basis because the
Barton-Aschman traffic study, which is the source for this
analysis, was set up to analyze traffic at three threshold
points; at existinq developMent, at existing plus committed
development, and at buildout. For this reason, plus the fact
that the zone is almost built out, staff determined this method
of analysis was consistent with the phasing reqttirement outlinerl
in Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. However, based
on the projected buildout rate of the Carlsbad area, the
mitigation meas,ires have been categorized as either "short-term"
(1-3 years) or "long-term" (5-10 years).
C . Adequacy Findings
The existing road segments and intersections which are
impacted by Zone 3 1 s traffic, all conform with the arlnpterl
performance standard. When all approved or committed projects
traffic generation is added, three intersections fail to meet the
adopted standard and are projected at Level "F":
1. Palomar Airport Road at I-5 Northbound
2. Palomar Airport Road at I-5 Southbound
3. Palomar Airport Road at Paseo del Norte
Based upon projected development which affects these
intersections, it is anticipated that at some point in the
future, as approved projects are coristructe~, they will fail to
meet the ~dopted performance standarn.
80 11/87
It is anticipated that the existing residential land uses
will be able to build out prior to these intersections failing to
meet the adopted performance standard. The remaining non-
residential land uses may not be able to completely develop until
improvements are made at these intersections.
As more specific development plans and other Local
Facility Managemen~ Plans are prepared for those zones which
impact these intersections, it will become clearer as to the
exact timing of these needed improvements.
III. MITIGATION
The Barton-Aschman traffic report and additional
supplemental analyses identify improvements to these impacted
intersections which will enable them to conform with the adopted
circulation standard. For the near term (1-3 years) and the long
term (5-10 years).
Northbound I-5 at Palomar Airport Road
Widening of the east and west approaches to provide an
additional through lane for each direction would allow
this intersection to operate at a level of service at
existing plus committed of A and B respectively. These
improvements are shown on Exhibit N, "Palomar Airport Road
-I-5 Northbound" on Page 87. However, these improvements
would require the ultimate widening of the I-5/Palomar
Airport Road overpass, and would be needed in the long-
term, 5-10 years. An increment of traffic from the Car
Country Expansion of Zone 3 or an equal amount from
committed projects, can be accommodated without overpass
widening by providing a free right turn lane for the
northbound to east~ound off ramp movement and by
signalization. This off ramp intersection would operate
at LOS A and C during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours,
respectively. These interim improvements are shown on
page 88, and would be needed in the short-term, 1-3
years.
Southbound I-5 at Palomar Airport Road
The improvements would consist of re-stripping to provide
two through lanes for eastbound and westhound traffic and
widening of the southbound off ramp to provide three lanes
(one left only, one right only and one optional). These
improvemenis ~ould result in a service level of A and C
respectively with the existing plus committed projects.
These improvments are shown Exhibit P, "Palomar Airport
Road I-5 Southbound" on Page 89. However, these
81 11/87
improvments would require the ultimate widening of the I-5
Palomar Airport Road overpass, and would be needed in the
long term, 5-10 years. An increment of traffic from the
Car Country Expansion of Zone 3, or an equal amount from
committed projects, can be accommodated without overpass
widening by the interim signalization of this southbound
off ramp intersection, and the widening of Palomar Airport
Road at the southbound on ramp. This off ramp
intersection would operate at LOS A and A during the A.M.
and ~.M. peak hours, respectively. The interim
improvement would he necessary in the short-term, 1-3
years.
Palomar Airport Road at Paseo del Norte
The improvements consist of widening the westbound
approach to provide a separate right-turn only lane and
widening the northbound approach to provide two left-turn
only lanes. Signage would also be recommended for the
westbound approach to direct traffic to the proper lanes.
These improvements would result in a level of service of B
and n respectively. The improvmenis are shown on Exhibit
Q, "Palomar Airport Road -Paseo del Norte" on Page ?O.
Before the development of all committed projects, an
increment of traffic from Car Country Expansion or an
equal amount from the committed projects can be
accommodated at the Palomar Airport Road/Paseo del Norte
intersection by the addition of a dual left turn lane for
the eastbound to northbound movement. This dual left turn
lane can be accommodated within the existing curbs of
Palomar Airport Road by the removal of the existing eight
foot median, restripping the westbound lanes, and the
addition of detector loops in the new left turn lane, as
shown on Page 91. These interim improvements would be
needed in the short term, 1-3 years.
All street improvements needed to bring all roads up to
full standards required by the Circulation Element for
Zone 3 are provided as additional information on Table 1,
"Bulldout Improvements", Page 94.
Traffic Impacts of Future Development
In Zone 3 there are no residential projects and only three
non-residential projects in the approval or committed
category including the Car Country Expansion. The traffic
generated by these projects will have a minor impact on
Circulation Element Roads and Intersections in Zone 3. As
noted above, three intersections will be at Service Level
"F'' when existing plus committed projects impacting these
82 11/87
intersections have been constructed. Based on staff's
estimate of phasing, these committed projects will not be
completely built out until 1995. The 18 remaining vacant
lots will most likely be developed prior to 1995.
Therefore, it has been determined that the remaining
vacant residential lots in Zone 3 will be able to buildout
before the three above mentioned intersections fail to
meet the performance standard for circulation.
Some of the vacant non-residential lots in Zone 3 that do
not have any approvals or committed projects may not be
developed until after 1995. If by the time these lots are
ready to develop the intersections of Palomar Airport Road
and 1-5 and Palomar Airport Road and Paseo del Norte do
not comply with the performance standard these properties
will not be able to develop until the intersections are
improved.
Outside Traffic Impacts from Zone 3
Traffic generated by Zone 3 does not impact any
Circulation Element Road or Intersection outside of the
Zone. Zone 3 is bisected by Interstate 5, California's
major north-south highway. As shown by Exhibit S, "Trip
Generation -Zone 3", on Page 92 the vast majority of the
traffic generated by Zone 3 will consist of travel
service, industrial or office uses. Almost all of the
travel service traffic will utilize Interstate 5 when
entering or leaving the Zone. Some of the office/
industrial traffic may use surface streets; however, the
total araount of traffic impacting any road segment or
intersection outside of Zone 3 would be less than 20% of
the total traffic generated by Zone 3.
Buildout Arterial Improvements
All of the Circulation Element Roads have been constructed
to their full length within Zone 3 except Cannon Road
extended east from Paseo del Norte. All of these roads
have sections that have not been built out to their
ultimate right-of-way width. Many of the traffic signals
needed at the intersections of arterial streets in Zone 3
have not been constructed at this time.
Each of the arterials within Zone 3 has been broken into
segments, as shown on map "Existing and Proposed Street
Improvements", on Page 93. This exhibit distinguishes
between fully improved and partially improved segments of
the roads. It also notes future traffic signals that will
need to be installed prior to buildout or at buildout.
Partially improved segments or intersections needing a
83 11/87
A •
traffic signal at some future date have been assigned a
letter. Underneath this letter is a series of numbers and
letters which list the neened improvements on each
unimproved section. The legend on Table 1, "Buildout
Improvements" on Page 94 explains what each of these
letters signifies.
The needed improvements, the approximate length of the
needed improvements, the approximate cost of the
improvements and the source of the improvements is shown
on Table 1, "Buildout Improvements" on Page 94. This
information was obtained from a number of sources. A
field survey was done by staff to determine what
improvements were needed on each partially improved
segment. The approximate length of the needed
improvements was determined by the use of maps, recent
aerial photos, or actually measuring the length of the
needed improvements in the field. The cost estimates for
the needed improvements were obtained from a number of
sources. Some of these improvements have been identified
as Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District Projects.
Others were identified as Public Facility Fee funded
projects. The Engineering Department has already
estimated the approximate cost of improvements that would
be provided as Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District
and Public Facility Fee funded projects.
Staff estimated the cost of other needed improvements that
were not listed as Bridge and Thoroughfare or Public
Facilities Fee projects. This was done by obtaining an
approximate cost estimate per linear foot for various
portions of a Circulation Element roadway.
It should be noted that all of the estimated costs for the
needed improvements are based on 1987 costs. Future
inflation rates could substantially increase the cost of
these improvements. In addition, unforseen soils problems
necessitatinq excessive amounts of grading could
substantially increase the cost of the needed
improvements. This is especialfy so for the needed
improvements that have not been listen as Bridge and
Thoroughfare or Public Facility Fee projects since no
detailed engineering studies have been done for these
improvements.
Special Conditions for Zone 3
1) All future development within Zone 3 shall continue to
pay Traffic Impact Fees, Public Facilities Fees and
participate in the Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit
District.
84 11/87
2) An on-going monitoring system shall be established to
evaluate the aspects of improvements, development, and
demand on circulation facilities. The required
improvements of ~ section may be modified without
formal amendment to this plan.
3) Should the performance standard of any facility within
Zone 3 fa~l below the adopted level of service, all
discretionary approvals or development permits shall
be halted until su~h time as appropriate mitigation is
installed and the performance standard has been met.
4) Based upon the projected traffic volumes, the I-5/
Palomar Airport Road and the Paseo del Norte/Palo~ar
Airport Road mitigation shall be designed, bonded, a
schedule submitted and approved by the City Engineer
indicating completion of these intersections within
one to three years. Specifically, the mitigation
required is:
(1) Free right turn I-5 northbound off-ramp to
eastbound Palomar Airport Road.
(2) Interim signalization of I-5 northbound off-
ramp.
(3) Interim signalization of I-5 southbound off-
ramp.
(4) Dual left turn lanes for Palomar Airport Road
eastbound to northbound Paseo del Norte
movement/replacement of median, restripping
the westbound lanes and the addition of
detector loops.
5) In any event, these improvements must be in place as
needed to maintain conformance with the performance
stdndard or all development will be stoned in zones
which impact these interesections should the standard
not be met.
B. Financing
The source of funds for th~ needed future circulation
improvements in Zone 3 and impacted by Zone 3 is also listed on
Table 1, on Page 94. The City collects fees from all projects
located in the Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit Oistrict. This
money will go for interchange improvements at the intersections
of Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia Lane, La Costa Avenue and
Interstate 5. The cost of improving the intersection of Palomar
Airport Road and Interstate 5 which is located in Zone 3 is
estimated at $5,100,000.
85 11/87
The City currently collects a Public Facility Fee (PFF)
which is set at 3.5% of permit valuation. This fee is paid at
time of building valuation. Certain street improvements as well
as all needed traffic signals in Zone 3 will be paid for by
Public Facilities Fees. See Table 1, Page 94.
A few of the needed improvements are adjacent to large
parcels of undeveloped, but developable land. When these parcels
are developed the applicant will be required to construct the
needed improvements. See Table 1, Page 94.
Other needed improvements have been identified that will
not be provided by developers, PFF funds or Bridge and
Thoroughfare funds. See Table 1, Page 94. These segments are
located adjacent to undevelopable properties or are adjacent to
properties that have already been developed with single family
residences. The City has several options for financi~g the
improvements along the segments for which no clear funding source
has been identified:
1) Add them to the list of projects which will be funded
through Public Facility Fees.
2) Require future development within Zone 3 and outside
Zone 3 which contributes traffic to these segments to
fund part or all of the cost of the needed
improvem.ents.
3) Establish Assessment Districts to pay for the needed
improvements.
4) Establish traffic impact fees for all projects
contributing traffic to the impacted road sections or
intersections.
86 11/87
PALOMAR AIRPORT· ROAD
~
--+
-+
.,
al z
U')
..!.
t
+-
+-
J
..
SPCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AT
ALOMAR AIRPORT AT 1-5 NORTHBOUND
ATON ASCHMAN ASSOCIAT S. INC.
(EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED CONDITION)
87
EXHIBIT N
6
N
I
I
I
I
I
'
1-5 NORTHBOUND ON-RAMP
0 < 0 a:
t-a: 0
0.. a: <
0: < ~
0
...I < a.
~I
I
I
I
I
Cl)
Cl)
~ f5 ::s 0
i t,.;
!Q
~
I
l
I
I
l
l
I-
I
EXHIBIT 0
Remove existing curb -a tripe eaatbould lane
construct new curb and radius for right tum only lane
~ RIGHT TURN ONI.Y
~ 1-5 NORTHBOUND OFF-RAMP I-• (IJ
EXISTING CURB
-----r:zq
INTERIM OFF-RAMP IMPROVEMENTS
88 11/87
PALOMAR AIRPORT
.... ....
al en
U")
I
EXHIBIT P
S '--'C~H;.:E~M:,,;:.A.;:..T:...:IC~O:...;;F;;.=.P.:..:R~O:.:.;:PO::.:S.::E:...D:..:.l.:...M.:..P..:.RO_;:V:.:E:;.;:M;..:.E:..:;N:.;T:..;S:.:.A=T;.__ ____ ___.noN ~ALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD AT 1-5 SOUTHBOUND ..
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES. INC.
(EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED CONDITIONS) lJ
89
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAQ-
--+
\..
~ ~ t ~ ~
0 z
..J UJ 0
0 UJ en
c( c..
EXHIBIT Q
~
+-TO I-5 NB RAMP
+-TO I-5 SB RAMP
+-TI-RU
•
SCHEMATIC OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 6 ~~~!~~N~q~~~!~~EN A~~i§sl~~.~ri;'IlEsR:] .. !~c::. R=O~A~D~~A::T:;:;P~A~S~E~O:::;D~:E=L=N=O=R=T=E============-,-n N
(EXISTING PLUS COMMITTED CONDITION) Li
90
-PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD
EXISTING CURB
171
121
121
---~...-...... ___ ._.. ___ -',
_______________ JO •
101
RIGl-tT TURN ONLY
Existin Curb
121
12'
171
INTERIM MITIGATION FOR
CAR COUNTRY EXPANSION
WITHIN EXISTING CURBS
91
EXHIBIT R
NORTH LEG NO CHANGE
PASEO DEL NORTE
( 1) Remove existing median
(2) Restripe for dual eastbound
to northbound left turns
(3) Install detector loops in nP.w
left turn lane
SOUTH LEG NO CHANGE
11/87
w (!J z < :I:
(.)
0 z
(!J w _,J
I-en < w
ID
N
TRIPS GENERATED FROM LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMEN~ ZONE 3
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------EXISTING APPROVED FUTURE
LAND SQ.FT./ TRIPS SQ.FT./ TRIPS SQ.FT./ TRIPS TOTALS % OF TOTAL
USE UNITS GENERATED UNITS GENERATED UNITS GENERATED TRIPS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RESIDENTIAL 232 2,320 20 200 2,520 2.14%
COMMERCIAL
CAR DEALERS 272,584 16,355 243,936 14,636 30,991 26.28%
RESTAURANT 51,659 3,100 4,700 1,410 4,510 3.82%
RETAIL 43,624 21,812 4,872 2,436 24,248 20.56%
MOTEL 95,432 3,150 78,300 1,500 4,650 3.94%
GAS STATION 6,218 2,250 2,250 1.91%
DINNER THEATER 26,000 2,600 2,600 2.20%
TRAVEL SERVICE 277,042 33,245 33,245 28.19%
IND./PM OFFICE 889,829 17,797 70,000 1,400 196,020 3,920 23,117 19.60%
OFFICE 17,424 348 348 0.30%
MINIWAREHOUSE 104,068 520 520 0.44%
GOVERNMENT 8,652 26 69,696 209 235 0.20%
UTILITY 311,834 1,559 357,192 1,786 3,345 2.84%
TOTALS 68,369 9,866 54,344 132,579 ---------------------------======== ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
m X :c
IXJ --4
1/)
I
(I)
ASPHALT MEDIAN NEEDS
REPLACEMENT
I ON NORTH IIDE"' -----------~::.:.::.:~..:;,-,
(L) I
;·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·
; (H)
• M -------~-r--~
ZONE 1
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
[i] FULLY IMPROVED ROADWAYS
[] PARTIALLY IMPROVED ROADWAYS
Q PFF TRAFFIC SIGNAL
L-LANE
BL-BIKE LANE
M-MEDIAN
CG-CURB & GUTTER
$-SIDEWALK
SL-STREET LIGHT
ST-STREET TREE
(C)
ZONE 4
I
I
I
01y ot Carltbad
Gtowch Managem.-.1 Pr0t7am
NOVEMBER 1 8 8 7
(A)
(B)
(C)
( D )
( E )
(F)
(G)
(H)
TABLE 1
ZONE 3
Buildout Improvements
Paseo Del Norte -sidewalk, streetlights, street trees for
approximately 2,000 feet on east side. Approximate cost
$56,925. Source-future deielopment of the property.
Avenida Encinas, (south of Palomar Airport Road) -2 lanes,
bike lane, sidewalk, curb, gutter, street lights, street
trees for approximately 2,700 feet on west side.
Approximate cost -$356,063. Source -see alternatives.
* Note -Extensive fill required, which could substantially
increase the cost of this improvement.
Palomar Airport Road and Interstate 5 -Bridge and Ramp
Improvements 2 lanes, 2 bike lanes, 2 curb+ gutter, 2
sidewalk, 2 streetlight. Approximate Cost -$5,100,000.
Source -Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District.
Palomar Airport Road (west side of freeway to Carlsbad
Boulevard intersection) Bridge widening, T-intersection, 2
lanes, median, 2 sidewalks, 2 bike lanes, 2 curb+ gutter, 2
street trees, 2 streetlights, traffic signal. Approximate
cost $3,600,000. Source -PFF.
* Note -Palomar Airport Road and Carlsbad Boulevard to be
made into a signalized fully improved T intersection.
Carlsbad Boulevard (Palomar Airport Road to northerly
boundary). 2 lanes, median, 2 sidewalks, 2 curb and gutter,
2 streetlights, 2 street trees for approximately 4,000 feet
Approximate cost $1,105,400. Source -see alternatives.
Cannon Road (Carlsbad Boulevard to easterly edge of
Terramar) Lane, median, curb + gutter, sidewalk,
streetlight, street tree for approximately 750 feet on the
south side. Approximate cost $204,263. Source -see
alternatives.
Road (Easterly Edge of Terramar to east side of I-5) Cannon
Median
$184,000.
Approximately 1600 feet. Approximate cost
Source -see alternatives.
Cannon Road (East side of I-5 to easterly terminus) Replace
asphalt median with planted median, sidewalk on north side.
Approximately 750 feet: Approximate cost $107,250. Source
-Development on SDG&E property in Zone 13.
94
(I) Traffic Signal
Cost -$120,000.
Palomar Airport Road and Interstate 5.
Source -PFF. ·
(J) Traffic Signal Cannon Road and Paseo del Norte. Cost
-$65,000. Source -PFF.
(K) Traffic Signal Cannon Road and Interstate 5. Cost
-$120,000. Source -PFF.
(L) Traffic Signal -Cannon Road and Carlsbad Boulevard. Cost
-$65,000. Source -PFF.
(M) Traffic Signal Cannon Road and Avendia Encinas. Cost
-$60,000. Source -PFF.
95
96
FIRE
* FIRE STATIONS-EXISTING
0 l'IRE STATIONS-flLANNeO
11 1ft In u I I I
FIRE RESPONSE TIME
--STATION 1
--STATION 2
•--STATION 3
■■■ -STATION 4
ZONE 3
I
Sig,"' __ ,_,
-' -I --·-~ _.,.
10
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
97
I I
FIRE
CllyOI-
• NOVEMBER Is a 1
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
SUMMARY SHEET
FIRE
BUILD OUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Cor1ornww:e w/St!rdard) MITIGATION FUNDING
EXISTING
APPROVED
.FUTURE
*
232 Units * YES NIA N/A
0 Units * YES N/A N/A
C, z -(J)
< :c
Q.
252 Units * YES YES** N/A
The existing Fire Station locations will guarantee compliance
with the adopted performance standard at all times as the
Zone builds out.
98 11/87
FIRE
I PERFORMANCE STANDARD
No more than 1,500 dwelling units outside of a five minute
response time.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
Zone 3 ls-presently served by Fire Station No. 4 located
at 6885 Batiquitos Road. It ls also within the five minute
response time of Fire Station No. 1 located at 1275 Elm Avenue.
B. Phasing
Because Zone 3 ls almost entirely built out and because
future development will be minimal, there will be no impact on
conformance with the adopted performance standard. Therefore, it
was not necessary to do a phasing analysis for fire services in
Zone 3.
c. Adequacy Findings
During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, it was determined that Zone 3 presently meets
the fire performance standard and will continue to conform to
this standard to bulldout of the Zone.
III.
A.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 3
No conditions are necessary for fire services in Zone 3
because fire Station 4 ls located within the required five minute
response time of the entire zone. In addition, Station 1 also
provides back-up response to much of Zone 3 with five minutes.
B. financing
All fire facilities are in place for Zone 3 and the
required performance standard has been met and, therefore, no
special funding mechanisms are required.
99
100
OPEN SPACE
...
0 ... j[
:~;y;'./'.;.;_ /r' •I.,.,
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
OPEN SPACE-EXISTING AND FUTURE
lVO ' ., . .,. · 1 ; \ "f •. ~ •· .,.
P acilic Ocean
Zone 3 Is an infill zone and has no opportunity
tor an increase In the amount of open apace
fl OPEN SPACE AREA
,, NOVEMBER 1 ea 1
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
SUMM_ARY SHEET
OPEN SPACE
BUILD OUT ADEQUACY
DEMAND SUPPLY PROJECTION ( C Cl"lf011TW1Ce w/Strdard) MITIGATION FUNDING
EXISTING
APPROVED
.FUTURE
*
* * YES N/A N/A
* * YES N/A N/A
C, z -en < :c: a.
* * YES YES** N/A
Ouring preparation of Citywide Facilities and Improvement
Plan, it was determined that the adopted performance standards
for Open Space in Zone 3 have already been met.
102 11/87
OPEN SPACE
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Fifteen percent of the
exclusive of environmentally
must be .set aside for permanent
concurrent with development.
total land ~rea in the zone
constrained non-developable land
open space and must be available
II. FACILITY PLANNING ANO ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory
During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan it was determined that certain areas of the
City are already developed or meet or exceed the requirements for
Open Space and, therefore, an analysis is not needed in the local
plan. This includes Zones 1 through 10, as well as, 16. Zone 3,
an infill zone, is almost completely built out with only a small
amount of remaining land available for development. This
eliminates the opportunity to create future permanent open space
unless existing structures are removed. For these reasons, the
Open Space facility for Zone 3 needs no further analysis.
Zone 3 has 98.6 acres of land which are designated as Open
Space in the land Use Element of the General Plan. This land
falls into two major categories: (1) Cannon Park and (2)
miscellaneous State City owned land. Please refer to Exhibit A,
"Existing land Use Categories" on Page 20, for the exact breakdown
by acreage.
B. Phasing
Because Zone 3 is an infill zone with no future·
opportunity to increase open space, the phasing requirements for
Open Space were not addressed as required by Chapter
21.90.110(d)(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
C. Adequacy Findinas
During preparation of the Citywide Facilities and
Improvements Plan, it was determined that the adopted performance
standards for Open Space in Zone 3 have already been met.
I I I.
A.
MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 3
There are no special conditions which apply at this time.
103 11/87
B. Financing
Because Zone 3 creates a minimal amount of future
development, it has been assumed development will continue to
provide open space as a part of specific development approvals.
Therefore, financing was not addressed as required by Chapter
21.90.110(d)(3) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
104 11/87
105
SCHOOLS
School District Boundaries
CARLSBAD
•o
ZONE 3
ZONE 3
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
106
ZONE 3
t
• • •
0
D
6
ZONE 3
PA l OM A•
EXISTING
ELEMENTARY
JUNIOR HIGH
HIGH SCHOOL
FUTURE
ELEMENTARY
JUNIOR HIGH
HIGH SCHOOL
<JI .. ,
;;,
I
I ,
/ /'' ,~ ...... o ... ,.
I
cosr•
Do
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
107
,o ,:::
\ ,.
I-< r I ,
I
I
I \
SCHOOLS
City i:tlCiWtsaaa
Gro•fl'I ~Ml 12it-09'U"
~4 ~¾=
/
I AMENDED
NOVEMBER1987
BUILD OUT
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
SCHOOLS
SUMMARY SHEET
ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Ccncrnaw:. wlStlSldard) MITIGATION FUNDING
EXISTING * * YES NIA
APPROVED ------YES NIA
(!J
z -(J'J
< ::c a.
FUTURE ** ** YES NIA
*The Carlsbad Unified School District has capacity to meet the existing demands
generated from Zone 3.
**Because the future school demand from Zone 3 is minimal, the School District is
able to provide capacity at all times as the Zone builds out.
108
NIA
NIA
NIA
SCHOOLS
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
School capacity to meet the projected enrollment within
the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be
provided prior to projected occupancy.
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventorv
Zone 3 falls completely within the houndaries of the
Carlsbad Unified School District. Currently, there are no
schools in the Southwest Quadrant. Elementary school students in
Zone 3 attend Jefferson Street or Pine Street Elementary Schools.
Secondary school students attend Carlsbad Junior and Senior High
Schools. ·
The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan identifies
general locations for future school sites in each school
category. The locations are a result of the School Master
Location Study, completed in 1982. The Carlsbad Unified School
District is in the process of beqinninq to update the Scho-01
Master Location Plan.
B. Phasing
In Zone 3 there are presently 232 existing residential
dwelling units. As the zone builds out, there will be an
additional 20 residential dwelling units (14 sinale family and
three duplexes). These units will add an additional nine
students to the school demand generaten by Zone 3. The Carlsbad
Unified School District has indicated the ability to handle the
additional demand. Because the demand is so minimal and the
adopted performance standard will continue to be met, ohasing of
school facilities has not been addressed as reauired by Chapter
21.90.110(d}(2) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
C. Adequacy Findings
The Carlsbad Unified School District currently has
capacity for the existing demand generated hy Zone 3. Because
the future demand from this Zone is minimal, the school district
will also be able to provide capacity to the ultimate buildout of
Zone 3.
109 11/87
III. MITIGATION
Special Conditions for Zone 3
No condl~ions are necessary.
projected additional demand of only nine
Unified School District has indicated
accommodate the addition of this small
existing facilities.
B. Financing
The Zone will create a
students. The Carlsbad
they will be able to
number of students with
Future development will continue to pay school fees and no
financing options are necessary. The Carlsbad School District
has indicated that they can accommodate the additional students
generated in Zone 3 with existing facilities. Since existing
facilities can handle the additional nine students, no financing
alternatives for new facilities are required.
110
111
SEWER SYSTEM
ZONE 3
ZONE 3
Sewer District Boundarie:
•o
r--i -l ........... " .. ~ . ,,,. . = _................... i
: SAN MARCOS
5,n, .. ,
.....
LEUCADIA COUNTY
cos,.
cn,o,c•1•• i:--o•"' M.,..o-,ttent "'°•"'
NOVEMBER 1987
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
112
;·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-·-· EXISTING j SEWER BASIN AH 13
PUMP •
STATION / '-. • ◄e• FORCE MAIN □.:;;::--------------------------------\ I~ .
\ . -·-·~ .,
ZONE 1
. ., .
I .
I
,...,,.
EXISTING
PUMP
STATION
---
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
EXISTING & PROPO.SED SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
EXISTING SEWER LINES
PROPOSED SEWER LINES
ZONE 22
a: 0 t I.) a: ~
: ZONE 4
~ t .. f .. ~ =~, ; . ·+------:,, g
I
ENCINA I
WASTE WATER
FACILITY I
I
C11v ot Carlabeel
Gro,..1h Man.garn.n1 Pfogr.1m
NOVEMBER 1 ea 7
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
SUMMARY SHEET
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
BUILD OUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (Cc:normn:e w/Stsmrd) MIT/GA TION FUND-ING
EXISTING *
15.66** YES N/A N/A
HGO • 2 3 ,~
* APPROVED 15.66** YES N/A*** N/A***
HGO C, z -n
"' c(
J: * Q.
.FUTURE *** NO*** ***
HGO .• 32
* Interceptors are not monitored for existing capacity. (High
water levels have been monitored and pipe capacity ls not
being met.)
** iZ.76 MGD Vista/Carlsbad
Sanitation interceptor~
existing agreements with
Sanitation District.
interceptor and 2.9 MGD Buena
These capacities are based on
City of Vista and Buena Vista
*** Both interceptors will be upgraded as a result of future
upstream demands generated outside of Zone 3. Specific
improvements will be identified in Sewer Master Plan update.
***
114 11/87
SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Trunk line
appropriate sewer
development.
capacity
district
to meet demand as determined by the
must be provided concurrent with
II. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
Service Area
Zone 3 lies entirely within and is served by the City of
Carlsbad sewer service district.
A. Inventory and Description
Zone 3 includes the Encina Water Pollution Control
Facility; therefore, all the major trunk line sewer interceptors
pass through this zone to some extent or another. Only the
Vista/Carlsbad interceptor and the R11Pna Sanitation interceptor
are used to actually service Zone 3.
The Vista/Carlsbad interceptor runs north to south across
Zone 3 and handles the majority of the Zone 3 sewer collection
needs as shown on map, "Existing and Proposed Sewer Improvements"
on Page 108. There are a series of five sewer collection
networks which branch out from the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor to
service the various sewer sub-basins within Zone 3. Each of
these sub-basins gravity flows to the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor
with the exception of a small sub-basin which includes a sewer
pump station. The sewer pump station services the Encina Power
Plant property and the neighboring Terramar subdivision area.
Per the sewer master plan the southwest quadrant of Zone 13 will
drain into the sewer collections network on Paseo del Norte.
The Vista/Carlsbad trunk line interceptor presently serves
not only Zone 3 but Zones 1, 2, 7, 15, 24, 25 as well as portions
of the City of Vista. In the future this line or an upgraded
facility will also serve Zones 5, 8, 13, 14 and 16.
A small portion of land in the southeast quadrant of Zone
3 is served by a gravity sewer collection network which connects
to the Buena -Sanitation trunk line interceptor. The Buena
Sanitation interceptor runs east to west across Zone 3 and
presently serves Zones 3, 4, and 5, as well as portions of San
Marcos and Vista. In the futare this line will additionally
serve all or portions of Zones 13, 17 and 20. This line is also
shown on map, "Existing and Proposed Sewer Improvements" on Page
108.
115
With the exception of the trunk line interceptor all the
sewer collection facilities in Zone 3 are owned and maintained by
the City of Carlsbad. The Vista/Carlsbad interceptor is jointly
owned and maintained by the City of Carlsbad and The Vista
Sanitation District. City capacity rights in the Vista/Carlsbad
line through Zone 3 ~re ~n 41% of the pipe capacity which equates
to approximately 12.76 million gallons per day.
The Buena Sanitation interceptor ls owned and maintained
by the Buena Sanitation District (County of San Diego). By
agreement, the City of Carlsbad shares capacity rights in this
line with the Vista Sanitation District and the Buena Sanitation
District. City capacity rights in the Buena line through Zone 3
are 32.735% of the pipe capacity which equates to approximately
2.90 million gallons per day.
8. Phasing and Service Demand
Existing committed and future sewer collection demands are
shown on Exhibit R, "Sewer Demand" on Page 113. The service
demands have been divided by interceptor to facilitate future
analysis of each of these major sewer trunk line interceptors.
The City is currently in the process of revising and updating _the
sewer master plan. Until these revisions have been completed,
analysis of the upstream service demands cannot be adequately
made, although the analysis for Zone 3 has been completed.
Facility Analysis
The existing sewer collection networks for Zone 3 will
conform with the adopted performance standard for existing and
committed service demand. The sewer master plan does indicate
the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor will not conform with the adopted
performance standard at the bulldout needs of the City of
Carlsbad and the Vista Sanitation District. These buildout
demands of both the City of Carlsbad and the Vista Sanitation
District will be the result of upstream development outside of
Zone 3. The ultimate buildout of Zone 3 does not necessitate
upgrading these facilities and will, therefore, conform with the
adopted performance standard. The detailed analysis of the
buildout needs of the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor will not be
available until the sewer master plan has been updated or as
upstream zones prepare their local plans.
In addition, the recent study of the Buena Sanitation and
San Marcos interceptors prepared by Dexter Wilson Engineering
concludes that the combined capacity of these two interceptors
will not conform with the adopted performance standard for the
buildout needs of the City of Carlsbad and other associated sewer
districts. As with the Vista/Carlsbad interceptor, the demands
are almost entirely the result of upstream development outside
Zone 3. The ultimate buildout of Zone 3 does not necessitate
116
upgrading these facilities and will, therefore, conform with the
adopted performance standard. The detailed analysis of the
buildout needs of the Buena Sanitation interceptor will not be
available until the sewer master plan has been updated or as
upstream zones prepare their local plans.
c. Adequacy Findings
The sewer collection system currently meets the adopted
performance standard. Zone 3 will be able to buildout and not
change this conclusion. However, as upstream or out of zone
development is proposed, certain facilities (the Vista/Carlsbad
interceptor) will need to be upgraded. The specific improvements
will be addressed in the revised Sewer Master Plan as well as
when the local plans which will impact this line are prepared.
MITIGATION III.
A. Special Conditio~s for Zone 3
The facility analysis above indicated that the sewer
collection system for Zone 3 will conform to the adopted
performance standard to the buildout of the zone. Therefore,
pursuant to Section 21.90.110(d)(4) of the Carlsbad Municipal
Code, no special conditions on future development are required at
this time.
B. Financing
Future development will continue to pay sewer related fees
which will fund the operations and maintenance of the system.
117
Master Plan
Demand Trunkline Reach
Status Interceetor Designation
Existing Vista/Carlsbad 609-610
Buena Sanitation 209-610
..... ..... Committed N/A 00
Future Vista/Carlsbad 609-610
Buena Sanitation 209-610
SEWER DEMAND EXHIBIT T
ZONE 3
Land
Use
Residential
Convnercial
Industrial
Utility
Commercial
Office
Industrial
Government
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Commercial
Acres/Square
Footage/Number Demand (EDU's)* Demand
of Units Subtotal
231 Units 231
396,000 SF 220
604,000 SF 250
311,800 SF 6
707 EDU
75,800 SF 42
30,800 SF 17
316,300 SF 131
73,200 SF 8
198 EDU
None
21 Units 21
43.6 Acres 267
11.3 Acres 43
331 EDU
3.3 Acres 32
32 rnu
* Equivalent dwelling units which equal
average daily flow divided by 246
Gallons Per Day
11/87
119
WATER SYSTEM
ZONE 3
Water Service Districts
ros r •
•o
; .......... , .. ,11,,
! j
j 1 SAN MARCOS
1 f "''"'""""""'""" .....
:
: ◄ '-'t
OLIVENHA IN
OlJVE NHA.tN
Clly of c1,1in,•o
Gro•tll Afat1eQ11m«tt PtcQf am
fflg!
NOVEMBER 1 9 a 7
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
120
.....
N .....
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
ZONE 1 I -I
-EXISTING WATER LINES
••-■ PROPOSED WATER LINES
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
1 0 •
ZONE 22
~·'
I
I
I
I
Cily of Cwllbad
Growlh ManaQlltnant Ptogam
NOVEMBER 1a1
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN-ZONE 3
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
SUMMARY SHEET
BUILDOUT ADEQUACY
PROJECTION DEMAND SUPPLY (CQftlin•ice MITIGATION w/Stlftfard)
EXISTING * * YES NIA
APPROVED ------YES NIA
(!J z -"' <
J:
ti.
FUTURE ** ** YES NIA
*The Costa Real Water District has capacity to meet the existing demands of
Zone 3.
**Because the future demands from Zone 3 will be minimal, the Water District
will be able to provide capacity at all times as the Zone builds out.
122
FUNDING
NIA
N/A
NIA
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARD
line
appropriate
development.
capacity to meet demand as determined by the
water district must be provided concurrent with
A minimum 10 day average storage capacity must be provided
prior to any development.
II. FACILITY PLANNING ANO ADEQUACY ANALYSIS
A. Inventory and Description
Water service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three
independent agencies, Costa Real Municipal Water District, San
Marcos County Water District, and the Olivenhain Municipal Water
District. Water service for Zone 3 ls provided entirely by the
Costa Real Municipal Water District.
Costa Real Municipal Water District has identified those
facilities which need to be added, upgraded, and improved in
order to meet the needs of future growth within their service
area. The facilities shown on map, "Water Distribution System"
on. Page 116 are currently in place and servicing the existing
development.
As the Zone builds out, certain facilities will need to be
improved, upgraded, or added to service the buildout of the Zone
3. As identified by the Costa Real Munidipal Water District,
these facilities will be financed by the District's Capital
Improvement Budget. Revenues for that budget are collected from
Water Enterprise Funds charged by the water district.
B. Phasing
The performance standard indicates that line capacity must
meet demand as determined by the appropriate water district.
Costa Real Municipal Water District has indicated that minor
improvements, such as the ones remaining in Zone 3, can be
handled at the time of development, and the extent of those
improvements cannot be determined until development occurs.
Since Zone 3 ls largely developed and only minor improvements are
necessary as determined by the water district, no phasing ls
necessary.
C. Adequacy Findings
The Costa Real Municipal Water District service to Zone 3
conforms with the adopted performance standard. Because this
123
zone is almost completely built out, the additional water demands
will be minimal and conformance with the standarrl will be
maintained to the ultimate buildout of Zone 3.
MITIGATION III.
A. Special Conditions for Zone 3
All development within Zone 3 shall pay the required Costa
Real Municipal Water District fees.
B. Financinq
Remaining facilities and improvements in Zone 3 will be
financed by the Costa Real Municipal Water District's Capital
Improvement Budget. Revenues for that budget are funded from
Water Enterprise Funds charged by the District.
124
125
APPENDICES
ADT Average daily
daily vehicle trips
associated region.
APPENDIX 1
CLOSSARY
trips. A guide of average, or estimated
generated from a specific project or
APN Assessor's Parcel Number. A portion of the legal
description which specifically identifies each parcel of land.
Buildout The year when the City of Carlsbad is completely
developed with all associated public facilities in place.
Bridge and Thoroughfare Benefit District -A district estahlished
to fund major thoroughfares and bridge improvements. These
bridge improvements are at I-5, Palomar Airport Road, Poinsettia
lane, and la Costa Avenue. See Exhibit S, Page 125.
CIP -Abbreviation for Capital Improvement Program.
Community Park 20 -50 acres in size; designed to serve the
broad recreational needs of several neighborhoods; located
adjacent to secondary arterial or greater; publicly owned.
Demand -The amount of needed facility generated within the zone,
quadrant, or City based upon the adopted performance standard.
DU -Abbreviation for dwelling unit.
EDU Equivalent dwelling unit. The average amount of sewage
generated by a single family household per day. Commercial and
industrial developments are also converted into EOlJ's to assess
their direct impact upon facilities.
Environmentally Constrained lands -Beaches, wetlands, floodways,
other water bodies, riparian and woodland habitats, slopes
greater than 25%, major roadways, railroad tracks, and major
powerline easements.
126
General Plan Density Ranges
Residential Land Use
Allowed
Units Per Acre
RL -Residential Low
RLM -Residential Low-Medium
RM -Residential Medium
RMH -Residential Medium-High
RH -Residential High
Growth Management Control Point
0 -1 • 5
0 -4.0
4.0 -8.0
8.0 -15.0
15.0 -23.0
Re~idential Land Use
Allowed
Units Per Acre
RL
RLM
RM
RMH
RH
1.0
3.2
6.0
11. 5
19.0
Established based upon the overall average land use yield in each
designation or the midpoint of the density range.
ICU -Abbreviation for Intersection Capacity Unit. The ratio of
traffic demands to be placed on an intersection in relation to
the capacity of an intersection.
Level of Service The relative level of operation of an
intersection or traffic signal.
Level of
Service
(LOS)
A
B
Description
Free flow (relatively). If signalized,
conditions are such that no approach
phase ls fully utilized by traffic and
no vehicle waits through more than one
red indication. Very slight or no delay.
Stable flow. If signalizP-d, an occa-
sional approach phase is fully utilized;
vehicle platoons are formed. This level
is suitable operation for rural design
purposes. Slight delay.
127
ICU
Value
0.00-0.60
0.61-0.70
level of
Service
(LOS)
C
D
E
F
Description
Stable flow of operation. If signalized,
drivers occasionally may have to wait
through more than one red indication.
Acceptable delay.
Approaching unstable flow or operation;
queues develop, but are periodically
cleared. Tolerable delay.
Unstable flow or operation; the inter-
section has reached ultimate capacity;
this condition is not uncommon in peak
hours. Congestion and intolerable delay.
Forced flow or operation. Intersection
operates below capacity.
ICU
Value
0.71-0.80
0.81-0.90
0.91-1.00
1.00+
Derived from: Highway Capacity Manual, HRB Special Report 87.
MGD Million gallons a day. A term used to describe flow of
water or sewage.
Net Vacant Acres Obtained by subtracting all of the 100% -----------constrained acres and one-half of the areas shown as 25-40%
slopes. Industrial and commercial development were then
multiplied by .4 to determine net acreage (this allows for all
regulations which affect overall lot coverage).
Open Space Pocket parks, homeowner ball fields, planned
residential development (PRO), common areas, tennis courts, or
other areas containing passive or active recreational facilities,
such as major power line easements.
PIL Park-in-Lieu Fee. A fee paid prior to the issuance of
building permits in lieu of land dedication for park purposes.
PFF -Public Facility Fee. A.2.5% fee paid prior to the issuance
of building permits. All proceeds from this fund are used for
the purpose of acquiring, building, improving, expanding and
equipping public property, improvements, and facilities.
128
Special Use Area -1-5 acres in size; a local facility of only
one or two activity type uses, i.e., tennis court, swimming pool,
etc.
TIF Traffic Impact Fee. A fee paid at issuance of building
permits for various traffic circulation improvements. The City
is divided into two fee categories: 1) The la Costa area and 2)
the remainder of the City. See Ex~ibit T, on Page 126.
129
ZONE 3
~ DISTRICT BOUNDARY
ZONE 3
BRIDGE & THOROUGHFARE DISTRICT
EXHIBIT U
130
t
Cllyot~
Growlft Mane9'fflent Program
LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
ZONE 3
POINSETllA LN ,+
1111111 AREA BOUNDARY
ZONE 3 n1
TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
EXHIBIT V
c11., at Ca,1,uo
Gowth Managlffflent A OQII' aM
LOCA.L FACILITIES MANAGE~AENT PLAN
5· I 6l ,I
I I 8:
I 91
101
11
12
13
I
l4ii !I ii 1s,1
lS;
'
17!
I,
201'.
23.: ,i
:I 24'.j
:1
25 i
'.I '
26 ii
27 ,:
281:
'I 1:
!:
ll
APPENDIX 2
11~1:'INANCF.: NO. 9808 -----
AN ORDINA~CE OF TFE CITY CCUNC!C. OF THE CITY CF
CAP LS BAO, CAC. !F'<"H;,~r !A AMEND!MG T!TC.E 21 OF Tf..fE
CAPLSBAD ~UN!C!P~L cnDE ~~ THE AD~!TION CF
CHAPTEP 21. 90 ESTABLISHING A GROWTH 1'1ANAGE~4f.~T
PROGPAM FOP THE CITY
The City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1: That Title 21 is amended by the addition ~c
Chapter 21.90 to read as follows:
Sections:
21.90.010
21.90.020
21.90.030
21.90.031
21.90.032
21.90.033
21.90.040
21.90.050
21.90.060
21.90.070
21.90.080
21.90.090
21.90.100
21.90.110
" 21.90.120
21.90.125
21.90.130
21.90.140
21.90.150
21.90.160
21.90.170
21.90.180
21.90.190
"Chapter 21.90
Growth ~anage~ent
Purnose and intent.
Definitions.
General crohibition, excections.
Tolling of ti~e for consideration of
applications sub~itted before the effective
date of this chapter.
Tollina of expiration of creviously issued
develop~ent permits.
Extensions of ~rior approvals orohibited.
Comoliance with this chapter reauired.
Establishment of local facilities ~anaQe~ent
fee.
Spec:al provisions for buildinq per:inits
issued during temporary moratoriu~.
Finding of health, safety and welfare
necessary for the fees imoosed by sections
21.90.050 and 21.90.060.
Perforfflance standard. -
Citywide facilities and i~crovements plan.
Local facilities ~anagement zones.
Contents ~f local facility ~anaqement plans. i
~acilities management olan oreoartion.
Facilities manaaement plan orocessinc.
I~plementation of facilities and
i~provements reauirements.
Obligation to cay fees or install
improve~ents reauired by any other law.
Implementing guidelines.
Exclusions.
Council actions, fees, notice.
Expiration of chapter.
Severability.
1.
132
,,
3'
I
4[
I
si I
Si
11 i
a:1
I I 91
j
lOi
I
11!
I
12:
1:3 ii ·!
14 :;
i 1s!I
I
16:I
:I 1,:1
1a,:
19
20'
21,;
'
22.
2:s'I 'I i• ' 24 'i ,,
!I 25.
! ., ·,
26 ,,
I ,,
27,
28 !
21.90.010 Puroose and intent.
(a) It is the r,olicy of the City of Carls:,ac to:
(l) Provide auality housina ocportunities f~r alt
economic sectors of the cc~~unity:
(2) Provide a balanced co~~unitv ~it~ adecua~e
commercial, industrial, recieational and op•n space areas t~
support th~ residential areas of the City:
(3) Ensure that public facilities and i~orove~er.tsi
~eeting City standards are available concurre~t with th~ need 1
created by new development:
(4) Balance the housina needs of the recion
aaainst the cublic service needs of Carlsbad residents ar.d
available fiscal and environ'"ental resources:
(S) Encouraae infill develoo'"ent in urbanize~
areas before allowina extensions of public ·facilities ar.d
improvements to areas which have yet to be urbanized:
(6) ensure that all develocment is consistent
the Carlsbad aeneral plan:
(7) Prevent growth unless adeauate public
facilities and im~rovements are provided in a phased and logical
fashion as reauired by the general plan:
-(8) Control of the timing and location of
develooment by tyinq the oace of development to the provision cf
public facilities and improvements at the times established by
the citywide facilities and i.rnprover,1ents plan.
(bl The City Council of the City of Carlsbad has
determined despite previous City Council actions includin~ but
not lill'lited to, ar,,endnients to the land use,. housina, and 9ar'<s
and recreation elements of the general plan, amend~ents to City
Council Policy No. 17, adoption of traffic il!'lcact fees, and
modification of cark dedication and imorovement recuirements,
that the deniand for facilities and imorovements has out?aced t~e
supply resultin9 in shortages in public facilities and
improvetTtents, ·includin~ l.Jut not limited to streets, parks, or,en
space, schools, libraries, drainage facilities and general ,
govern~ental facilities. The City Council has f~rther deter~ine~
that these shortages are detrimental to the public healt~, safet~
and welfare of the citizens of Carlsbad. !
(c) This chaQter is adopted to ensure the
implementation of the policies stated in subsection (a), to
eliminate the shortages identified in subsection (bl, to ensure
that no,development occurs without oroviding for adecuate
facilities and improve~ents, to re~ulate the oace of develocr.e~t
thereby ensuring a continued supply of housing over a ::::ei:-icd cf ,
years and to continue the auality of life for all econo~ic
sectors of the Carlsbad cofflmunity.
(d) This chapter will further the policies, goals ar.d
objectives established herein by reauirino identification of all
public facilities and improvements required for develop~ent, by
prohibiting development until adeauate provisions for the ~ublic:
facilities and improvements are made by developers of projects ·
within the City, and by givin9 develop'"ent nrioi:-ity to areas of
the City where public facilities and i~orovements are already •-'
place (infill areas).
2.
133
l. I
21
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
Q < ID I 13 "' ~ I -« I < GI
.) Ill C 141 ... ~ z z O ~ cc I
2 ►>0 1si m=c~ u :I :t .... ~ u I ->""' . 161 Z Ill~ Q Ill Z <
U 5 -ID i !-~ 171 >-cc < < ,. u .. u l8il
1:
19 ·1
1,
20':
'I
21',i
l
22:
23 :!
:i 24:1
II 25 !;
26 :i
:j
27 i,
28 ,,
·'
.,
I
(e) This chapter replaces the tel'loorary !"OC"atoz:-iu:---:'":
processing and approval of develop~ent projects imposed bv Ci:i
Council Ordinance No. 9791.
21.90.020 Definitions.
(a) Whenever the following terms are used in this
chapte~ they shall have the meaning established by t·his sect ion
unless from the context it is apparent that another ~eanino is intended: -
( l) "Citywide facilities and irnnrove!"ents olan"
means a plan prepared and approved according to Section 21.90.090
identifying those facilities and imcrovements reauirec on a
citywide basis to serve the projected population of the City 3s
established by the general plan and providing an outline and
budget for financing certain facilities and i~provements whic~
will be provided by the City.
(2) •oevelopment pe·rmit" means any pernit,
entitlement or approval whether discretionary or ministerial
issued under Title 20 or 21 of this code and any leaislative
actions such as zone chances, general plan amendments, or master
plan approval or amendment. ·
(3) "Development" means any use to which land is
put, building or other alteration of land and construction
inciden~ thereto.
(4), "Facilities• means any schools, parks, open
space, or recreational areas or structures providin~ for fire,
library, or govern~ental services, identified in a facilities
management plan.
(5) •I~provement• includes traffic controls,
streets and highways, including curbs, gutters, and sidewalks,
bridges, overcrossings, street interchanaes, flood control or
storm drain facilities, sewer faci·lities, water facilities and
lighting facilities.
· (6) •t.ocal facilities management plan" means a
facilities manaaefflent plan defined by Section 21.90.120 for a
local facilities management zone which is established accordinc
to Section 21.90.100.
21.90.030 General rohibition, exceotions.
a Un ess exempted by the provisions o this chapte~
no application for any building permit or develop~ent oermit
shall be accepted, processed or apcroved until a citywide
facilities and i~provements plan has been adopted and a local
facilities management plan for the applicable local facilities i
management zone has been sub~itted and approved accordinq to t~is
chapter. i
(b} No zone chan9e, general plan aIT1endtT1ent, master· ;,lari
a~endment or specific plan amendment which would ~ncease the 1
residential density or development intensity established by t~e
general plan in effect on the effective date of this chaote~
shall be approved unless an amendfflent to the citywide Eacilities
Manage~ent plan and the anplicable local f~cilities ~anace~ent
olan has first heen approved.
3.
134 -
2i
10
11
12
13
I
I ,I
141 I
151 !
lo;
11ll
I
1sii
ii
19,I
2011
:I
21
22
23 11
24" ·I I
25;
26 i
27
28
' ,,
I i (c) The classes of projects or pertrtits listed in t:;~s !
subsection shall be exempt from the provisions of subsect icr. (a\.,
Development permits and building permits for these ;>rejects ·
shall be subject to any fees established pursuant to the ci~-✓...,~=ei
facilities and improvement plan and any applicable local
facilities management plan.
Cl) Redevelopment projects.
(2) Projects consisting of the construction or
alteration of a single dwelling structure for a fa~ily on a lot
owned by the family intending to occupy the structure, or not
to exceed one noncwner-occu~ied house per individual for one or
more lots owned prior to July 20, 1986.
(3) Building permits and final maps for ?rejects
identified in Section 2(F) of Ordinance No. 9791 (projects for
.which cons~r~ction had 7ommenced and were designated on the map~
marked Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 9791 •as developing•>.
( 4) Building permits for projects for which all
required development permits were issued or approved on or befor
January 21, 1986. If all required development permits were
issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption shall \
apply to that portion. ·
( S) Building permits for projects for which all
required development permits were issued or apcroved before July
20, 1986 and for which building permits could have been issued
under Ordinance No. 9791. If all required development i;)ermits
were issued for a portion of the project only, the exemption
shall apply to that portion.
(6) Commercial and industrial projects ~ith
approved development permits or with a cOll'lplete acplication en
file with the City prior to June ll, 1986 for such permits. New i
permits for commercial and industrial projects located wit~in an
area· that has been previously approved for such uses :nay also be
processed and approved.
(7) Projects by nonprofit entities for structu~es
and uses for youth recreational and guidance pro~rams such as
boys and girls clubs.
(8) Zone changes or general plan amendments ,·
necessary to accomplish consistency between the general 9lan and,
zoning, to implement the provisions of the Local Coastal Plano~;
which the City Council finds will not increase the public \
facilities or services and which are initiated by the City
Council or Planning Commission.
(9) Public utility facilities and iJn~rovelT'enc
projects without accommodations for permanent employees are
exempt from the provisions of this chapter unless the City
Council determines they are of sufficient size and scale to
impact public facilities.
(10) Adjustment plats.
(11) Development permits for minor subdivisions
located in the northwest auadrant of the City as defined in
Ordinance No. 9791. Building permits for commercial or
industrial construction on lots in such subdivisions may ~e
approved. Residential building permits will not be aoc~oved =~=-
lots in such subdivisions unless otherwise exempt under t~is
4.
135
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
l4j1
isl
l6i
I l7j
.I 1aJI
" 19i!
2oi!
'1
21 11
22:1 2:s,,
24;j
,! 25 :;
,1
26 ;;
li 27'
chapter except one permit for a nonowner-occupied lot ~ay be
approved for each such subdivision.
(d} The provisions of this subsection apply to final
maps and other develop~ent permits for projects with a tentative
map approved before July 20, 1986 which are not included in the
exemptions listed in subsection (c). 1
. ( 1) If a tentative map or tentative parcel IT'ac wa1,
approved on or before January 21, 1986 then, after approval of
the citywide facilities plan, a final map or parcel mac ~ay be 1
processed and approved before the adoption of a local facil i t:y i
management plan.· The expiration period for those tentative macs :
shall be tolled until the citywide plan is adopted. The -i
expiration of any development permits issued in conjunct ion .wi t:hj those maps shall be tolled until the applicable local facilities
management plan is approved or, two years after the date the
citywide plan is approved, whichever occurs first.
· (2) If a tentative. map or tentative parcel mac wa
approved after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986, but th~
approval of final map or parcel map was prohibited by Ordinance
No. 9791 then approval of ftnal maps and parcel maps is
prohibited until after preparation of the applicable local
facilities management plan. The expiration period of those
tentative macs and tentative parcel maps, and any other
development permits issued in conjunct ion with the maps shall be
tolled until the local facilities management plan is approved,
or two years after date the citywide facilities and improvements
plan is approved, whichever occurs first.
(e) The exemption for projects listed in subsection (c'
(3), (4), (5}~ and (6) shall expire on July 20, 1988. After that1
date all development permits for those projects shall be fully !
subject to the provisions of this chapter. The exemptions for ! projects listed in subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), and (6) shall I
apply only so long as the facilities and improvements recuired as
a condition to the issuance of final development permits have
been installed or are being installed pursuant to a secured
agreement. Any breach of such secured improvement aqree1t1ent
shall subject any remaining building pertrtits for the project t~
the provisions of subsection (a).
(f) Final or parcel maps for projects listed in ,
subsection (c) (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) which comply with all /
the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and Title 20 of this.
Code which were filed with the City before July 20, 1986 1t1ay be :
approved by the City Council, or City Engineer as appropriate,
after July 20, 1986. Upon approval, those projects shall be
subject to the exemQtion of subsection (c).
(g) The City Council may authorize the processing of
and decision making on buildin9 permits and development ~r~its
for a project with a master plan approved before July 20, 1986
subject to the following restrictions: ,
(l) The City Council finds that the facilities and
improvements reauired by the master plan are sufficient to meet !
the needs created by the project and that the master plan i
developer has agreed to install those facilities and i~~rovements·
to the sati~faction of the City Council.
s.
136
I ,,
I
li I
2! i
Si i
9i
I 101
11
12! I
13! i
l4il
I
15 1 I
lSi
II
17!1
1a 1; ::
1911
21
22,
,I
23" ii
24 '.i
I ,I
25
25,
27
28"
(2) The master plan developer shall agree in
writing that all facilities and improvement requirements,
including but not limited to the payment of fees establis~ed =Y
the citywide facilities and manaqement ~lan and the ap9licable
local facilities management plan shall be applicable to
development within the master plan area and that the master ~lar.
developer shall comply with those plans.
( 3) The master plan establishes an educational
park and all uses within the park comprise an integral part cf
the educational facility.
(4.) Building perntits for the 129 unit i:-esidentia.!.
portion of Phase I of the project may be approved provided t~e
applicant has provided written evidence that an educational
entity will occupy Phase I of the project which the City Council
finds is satisfactory and consistent with the goals and incer.t ce
the approved master plan. '
( 5) Prior to the approval of the final map for
Phase I the master plan developer shall have agreed to
participate in the restoration of a siqnificant lagoon and
wetland resource area and made any dedications of property
necessary to accomplish the restoration.
Ch) After making the findings in paragraph l the City
Council may authorize the processing of and decision making on
master plans subject to the reauirements of paragraph 2. After
the grant of the easement required by subparagraph (h)(iv) the
tentative map for Phase I of the project, the site plan for the
commercial development and the local coastal plan amendment may
also be processed and approved. If such approvals are granted
and, subject to all other provisions of this code, grading and
building permits for construction of the golf course and firsc
phase of the commercial portions of the project may be processed:
and approved. ·
The processing and approval of all other developments
and building permits within the master plan. shall not occur ~nti.l!
after the citywide facilities plan and the local facilities
management plan have been adopted by the City Council.
(l)(i) That the master plan will provide all
necessary public facilities for the project and will c~re any
facilities deficits in the area affected by the project.
( ii) That the approval will not prejudice the ,
preparation of the citywide facilities plan and will improve t:-.e:
level of public facilities and services in the area.
(iii) That by the dedication of land and the
construction of public improvements the project will make a
significant contribution to the public facilities needs of the
city and provide for the preservation or enhancement of
sianificant environmental resources.
(2)(i) The master plan shall include all of t~e
information required by and implementing the provisions of
Sections 21.90.090 and 21.90.110 for the area covered by the
master plan.
(ii) The applicant shall agree in writing that all
facilities and improvement reauirements, including but noc
limited to ~he payment of fees established by the cicywide
6.
137
.I
1
I 2i
3
4 1 I s;
sl
71
8i
I 91
101
I 111
121
I
13 1
l4ij
15 !i
'1
16 :I
,I ,, 11:1
18;[
19'
20
21 i
22,
23:1
ii
24 ;i
11 25 1'
I
26 :1
i1
28 ii
:,
ii
11
facilities and improvement Plan and the applicable local
facilities management plan shall be applicable to development
within the master plan area and that the master plan develooer
shall comply with those requirements. ·
(iii) The master plan applicant shall agree to
participate in the restoration of a significant lagoon and
wetland resource area.
(iv) Prior to any processing on the ~aster plan
the applicant shall grant an easement over the property necessary
for the lagoon restoration and the right-of-way necessary for the
widening of La Costa Avenue and its intersection with El Camino I
Real.
21.90.031 Tolling of time for consideration of
applications submitted before the effective date of this
chapter.
After approval of the citywide facilities and
improvement plan and the applicable local facilities management
plan applications for development permits which were accepted as
complete before the effective date of this chapter shall have
processing priority in relationship to the acceptance date.
Until the approval of the plans all aoplicable time limits for
processing the development permits shall be tolled.
21.90.032 Tollino of exoiration of oreviously issued
development permits.
If a discretionary development permit, other than a
development permit issued in conjunction with a subdivision map,
issued prior to July 20, 1986 has an expiration period within
which building permits n,ust be issued and the issuance of
buildinq permits for the project is prohibited by this chapter
then the expiration period shall be tolled until t·he acplicable
local facilities management plan is approved, or two years after
the date the citywide p~an is approved, whichever occurs first.
21.90.033 Extensions of crior aocrovals orohibited.
After approval of an applicable local fac1lities
management plan an extension of the expiration date of any
development permit shall not be granted unless the extension is
found to be consistent with the plan. The decision makinq body
considering an extension may condition the extension upon
compliaace with the citywide plan and applicable local
facilities management olan.
21.90.040 Comoliance with this chanter.
(a) No development permit shall be approved unless the
approving authority tinds that the permit is consistent with the
citywide facilities and improvements plan and the applicable
local facilities management plan. To ensure consistency the
approving authority ~ay impose any condition to the approval
necessary to implement the plans. I
(b) No building permit shall be issued unless the fees,
reouired by this chapter, and any applicable local facilities :
management p_lan fees are first paid, and the oermit is consister.t
7.
138
I
!I ii
lli
I
2:I
·1 3·1
411 ,,
:11
I I
7:
I
a;I
9,
i
101
11!1
12:
Q I < = I 13; Ill ~ :c:C ., ., 00 -· ' < 14, z • :c 'I
. ~ 0 15 ii ~a"~ 2 < ... ~ <.J ' -,. ..... % ... 8 Q 16 i ... i"' < ~o-~ --~ 17:i >• ;:: < <
► <.J -u 18.
19
20;
21
22,
•I
23::
' ·i
24 i 'I
25
26 '
27
28 :;
I "
with the applicable local facilities management plan. As a
condition to the issuance of any building permit pursuant to
Section 21.90.030(cl the applicant shall aqree to pay the
appropriate fees within 30 days of the date each fee is
established.
(cl The requirements of this chapter are imposed as 3
condition of zoning on the property to ensure i.nlplementation cf
and consistency with the general plan and to i;:,rotect the public 1
health, safety and welfare by ensuring that public facilities ar.c
improvements will be installed to serve new develoi;:,~ent i;:,rior to
or concurrently with need.
21.90.050 Establish~ent of local facilities manace~e~~
(a) A local facilities manage~ent fee is hereby
established to pay for improvements or facilities identified i~ 3
local facilit~es_management plan which are rel~ted ~o new I
development within the zone and are not otherwise financed by an1
other fee, charge or tax on development, or are not installed cv
a developer as a condition of a building permit or development ·
permit. The fee may also be used to pay for that port ion of the
facilities or improvements identified in the citywide facilities
and improvements plan attributed to develooment within the local
zone which are not financed by other means. The facilities
management fee shall be paid before the issuance of a building !
permit. The amount of the fee shall be determined based upon the
estimated cost of the facility or improvement designated as !
necessary to accommodate additional development within the
applicable local facilities management zone plus the estimated
cost of facilities and i~provements identified in the citywide
facilities and improvement plan attributable to the local zone.
The fee shall be fairly apportioned among the new development. :
(b) The fee required by this section is in addition to!
any other means of fin? .. cing facilities or improvements j
identified by a local facilities management plan or any other :
tax, fee, charge or improvement reauirement which may be imposed i
on the development of property under the provisions of state law~
this code or City Council policy. :
(c) The amount of the fee for a local facilities '
management zone shall be set by City Council resolution after a
public hearing, published notice of which shall be given
according to Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.54.060(2) and
Government Code Section 54992.
(d) As a condition of any building or development
permit application submitted after the effective date of this
chapter the applicant shall agree to pay the fee established by ' i this section at the time a building permit is issued.
(e) The fee established by this section shall
at the time of issuance of a building permit.
be levied
21.90.060 Soecial orovisions for ouildina oe~mits
issued during temoorarv moratorium.
(a) Applicants for projects for which building per~its.
were issued after January 21, 1986 and before July 20, 1986 sha~l
a.
139
71 I 81
I 91
10
ll
12
13,
I
I
14 11
1s1I .,
1sii
11il
!1 20:,
21 :;
,I
22'!
23;
I
24:
i
I
25 I' I :i
2s !I
27 :: !
28
pay the fee established by Section 21.90.050 within 30 days aftej
the amount of the fee is determined by the City Council. Paymeni:.j
shall be made according to the agreement executed by the 1
applicant pursuant to Section 3 of Ordinance No. 9791. 1
21.90.070 Findin of health, safetv and·welfare
necessary or the
21.90.060.
(a) The City Council hereby declares that payment of
the fee established and imposed by Sections 21.90.050 and
21.90.060 and installation of the facilities and improvements
identified in a facilities management plan are necessary to
achieve the policies established in Section 21.90.010 and to
implement the City's general plan. If the fees are not paid or
the facilities or improvements are not installed the public
health, safety and welfare will suffer because there will be
insufficient facilities and improvements to accommodate any new
development. This finding is based upon City Council Policy No.
17, City Council Ordinance No. 9791, and the evidence presented
at the public hearings on the ordinance adopting this chapter.
(b) If any condition imposed as a conditon·of a
development permit or building permit pursuant to this chapter i
protested then the permit shall be suspended during the period o
the protest.
(c) This section is adopted pursuant to Government
Section 65913.5.
21.90.080 Performance standard.
The City ·council shall adopt general performance
standards for each facility or improvement listed in Section
2l.90.090(b) or 21.90.llO(c). Specific performance standards foi
citywide facilities shall be adopted as part of the citywide ,
facilities and improvement plan. Specific performance standards;
for each zone shall be auopted as part of the local facilities
management plan. If at any time after preparation of a local
facilities management plan the performance standards established
by a plan are not met then no development permits or building
permits shall b4 issued within the local zone until the
performance standard is met or arrangements satisfactory to the
City Council guaranteeing the facilities and improvements have
been made.
' 21.90.090 Cit wide facilities and imcrovements olan.
a To imp ement the City s general plan by securing
provision of facilities and improvements, and to ensure that I
development does not occur unless facilities and improvements ar~
available the City Council shall adopt by resolution a citywide I
facilities and improvements plan. The plan shall: Identify all!
facilities and improvements necessary to accommodate the land I
uses specified in the general plan and by the zoning; specify i
size, capacity and service level performance standards for the I
identified facilities and improvements1 establish specific ti~e /
tables for acquisition, installation and operation of the
facilities and improvements correlated to projected population
9.
140
7,
lOi
11/I
12 ! I
l:3;1 .,
14 I 'I
15 ·;
16 ,;
17 '!
18.
19
20'
21
22 ·:
23 :I ,,
i
24'
25
26
27
28:
:1
' "
I 'I
growth, facility and improvement performance standards, and
projected nonresidential develo~ment: identify the financing
method or methods for each facility and improvement: and
establish a facility and improvement bud~et for those facilities
or improvements which will be constructed or financed by the I
City. The plan shall encourage inf ill developn,ent and reduce t!"!e,
growth inducing impact of premature extension of facilities or
imcrovements to undeveloped.areas by establishing priorities for
facility and improvement installation or financing.
(b) The citywide facilities and improvement ~lan shall
show how and when the following facilities and improvements ·.;ill
be installed or financed as specified in subsection (c).
(l) Major sewage transmission systems and se~age
treatment plants:
(2) Major water transmission lines:
(3) Major area wide draina~e facilities:
(4) Prime and Major arterials; freeway
interchanges, bridges or overcrossings;
(5) Fire facilities:
(6) Governmental administration facilities:
(7) Parks and other recreational facilities:
( 8) t.ibraries.
Cc) The plan shall include the following information
with regard to each facility and improvement listed in suosectio~
( b) : i
(1) An inventory of present and future 1
requirements for each facility and improvement based upon the '
-performance standard established for each facility and
improvement. Cost estimates shall be included. The inventorv
shall be consistent with the general clan and zoning for the·
area.
(2) A phasing schedule establishing the timing Eci::
installation or r:,rovisions of facilities or i,r.,crovements in
relationship to the amo 1•11t of development activity (e.g. number !
of dwelling units, nu~ber of scruare feet of commercial space
within the service area of the facility or improvement) and the
facility and improvement performance standards.
(3) A financing plan establishing various methods:
of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the '.
plan. The plan shall identify those facilities and improve~ents !
which would otherwise be provided as a requirement of processir.g'
a devel9pment project (i.e. reauirements imposed as a condition
of a development permit) or provided by the developer in order t~
establish consistency ~ith the general 9lan or Titles 18, 20 or .
21 of this Code, and those facilities and improvements ~or •.;hich,
new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure i
sufficient funds are available to construct or provide facilities
or improvements when required by the phasing schedule. 1
(d) The City Manager shall prepare and present the plan
to the City Council not later than one year from the effective
date of this ordinance.
10.
141
3 11
411 I I 5'
61
11
!
ajl
I gl
i lOi
11[1
121
1:s I
14/i
'I
1s!I
•!
16 i
19 ·:
20"
21:
22·:.
23 :!
·1
24 'I ,1
II
25 ,i
26 ::
:I
27
28 1i
-_ · ( e) Amendments to this citywide facilities and
improvements plan shall~• initiated by action of the Planninc
Commission or City Council. i I I
21.90.100 tocal facilities manaaement zones. I
(a) The City Council shall divide the City into
facilities management zones. i
(b) The boundaries of the zones shall be established 'I
based upon logical facilities and improvements plannina, ,
construction and service relationships to ensure the economicall0
efficient and timely installation of required facilities and •
improvements. In establishing zone boundaries the City Council
shall also be guided by the following considerations:
(1) Service areas or drainage basins:
(2) Extent to which facilities or improvements a~e
in place or available; I
(3) Ownership of property:
plan areas;
(41 Boundaries of existing zoning master plans:
(5) Boundaries of pending zoning master plans;
(6) Boundaries of potential future zoning master
(7) Boundaries of approved tentative maps;
(8) Public facilities relationships, especially
the relationship to the City's planned major circulation
network;
(9) Special district service territories;
(10) Approved fire, drainage, sewer, or other
facilities or improvement master plans. .
(c) The zones shall be established by resolution after!
a public hearing notice of which is given pursuant to Section :
21.54.060(2) of this code. '
21.90.110 Contents of local facilit ~ana e~ent olar.s. I
a) A local fa~1l1t1es management plan shall be I
prepared for each facility zone and shall cover the entire zone. i
(b) The plan shall consist of maps, graphs, tables, and
I narrative text and shall be based upon the general plan and 1
zoning applicable within the local zone at the time of plan !
approval. The local facilities management plan shall be d
consistent with the citywide facilities and improvements plan an
shall implement the citywide facilities and improvements plan i
within the zone. 1
~ (c:) The facilities management plan shall show how and
when the following facilities and improvements necessary to -
accommodate development within the zone will be installed or
financed as specified in subsection (d).
(1) Sewer systems
(2) Water
(3) Drainage .
(4) Circulation
(5) Fire facilities
(6) Schools
(7) Parks and other recreational facilities
(8) Open space
11.
142
l..
2!
:3;
I 4'
Si
I a:
!
71
a:
i' i
91
I
10:
11/
I
12:
i
131
141\
1s !I
I 16:!
,I
17 11 .,
18,:
19
20'
21:
22,;
2:3:! :1 I
24 !I
•I
25 '! ..
26 ,I
27'
28 '!
I p
i
_ · (d) The plan shall be consistent with and implement 1::-:el
citywide facilities management plan and general plan and shall
include the following information with regard to each facilitv
and improvement listed in subsection (c): ·
Cl) An inventory of present and future
requirements for each facility and improvement based u;,on the
performance standard established for each facility. Because
improvement reauirements for certain facilities and improvements
may overlap zone boundaries a discussion of the need for
coordination and a proposed coordination plan for facilities
extending from one zone to another shall be included. Cost
estimates shall be included. It must be shown that development
in the zone will not reduce the facilities or imorove~ents
capabilities or create facilities or improvements shortages i~
other zones or reduce service capability in any zone below the
performance standard which is established pursuant to Section
21.90.080. The growth inducing impact of the ou·t of zone
improvements shall be assessed.
( 2) A phasing schedule establishing the t•iffling for
installation or provisions of facilities or improvements in
relationship to the amount of development activity (e.g. number
of d~elling units, number of square feet of commercial space,
etc.) for the facilities management zone. The ~hasing schedule
shall ensure that development of one area of the zone will not
utilize more than the area's prorata share of facility or
improvement capacity within that zone unless sufficient capacity
is ensured for other areas of the zone at the time of the first
development. The phasing schedule shall include a schedule of
development within the zone and a market data and cash flow
analysis for financing of facilities and improvements for the
zone. The phasing schedule shall identify periods where the
demand for facilities and improvements may exceed the capacity
and provide a plan for eliminating the shortfall. In those
situations when demand •xceeds capacity and it is not feasible tq
increase the capacity prior to development, no development shall:
occur unless a time schedule for and a means of increasing the 1
capacity is established in the plan.
( 3) A financing plan establishing various methods ,
of funding the facilities and improvements identified in the ;,lari
fairly allocating the cost. to the various properties within the I
zone. The plan shall identify those facilities and i.r.tprovements !
which ws,uld otherwise be provided as a ~equirement of processing:
a development project (i.e. requirements imposed as a condition
of a development ~rmit) or provided by the developer in orcer ~~
establish consistency with the general plan or Titles 18, 20 or /
21 of this Code, and those facilities and i~provements for which I
new funding methods which shall be sufficient to ensure I
sufficient funds are available to construct or provide !
facilities or improvements when required by the phasing schedulel
~here facilities or improvements are reauired for more than one i
zone, the phasing plan shall identify those other zones and t~e :
plan for each zone shall be coordinated. Coordination, however, i
I shall not require identical funding methods.
12.
143
l,
21
3•
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12 0 < ID I 131 14 ... a: a: ~ < ' . u ... < 14 1 ... ~ z 0 z a: o>~o 15 -►<~
IDij~~ ....... u
,_ :-liU • 16; z ... i0 ... z <
U ~ -ID
17! ! .. ~ > ... a: < < > u ... 'I ij 1a:;
. 1911
11
20J: ,I
21 1i
I II
22.;;
23 ii
Ii
24:! ,1
• 1! 25 :;
26 :: "
27
28 :;
(4) A list or schedule of facilities recuirements
correlated to individual development projects within the zone.
(e) The local facilities management plan shall
establish the proportionate share of the cost of facilities and
improvements identified in the citywide facilities and
improvement plan attributable to development of property on the
local facilities management zone.
21.90.120 Local facilities management olan
preparation.
(a) A local facilities management plan may be prepared
by the City or by the property owners within the zone accorcina
to the procedures established by this section.
(b) The City Council, upon its own initiative, may ~Y
resolution direct the City Manager to prepare a facilities
management plan for any zone. The City Council may assess the
cost of preparing the plan to the owners within the zone after a
hearing ten days written notice of which is given to the propert
owners within the zone. The cost shall be spread prorata
according to acreage and development potential.
(c) All owners within the zone may jointly submit a
facilities management plan.
(d) For zones in which joint submission of a facilitie
management plan is shown to be not feasible any owner or group c~
cooperating owners within the zone may petition the City Council,
to allow the owner or group of owners to prepare the plan. Afte
a meeting for which ten days prior written notice has been given
to the property owners within the zone, the City Council may
permit the owner or group of owners to prepare and submit the 1
plan. A limit based on the estimated cost of the plan shall ~e I
deterniined at the time of the hearing. The actual cost shall be I
determined when the plan is adopted and shall be assessed ~rorata
based on acreage and development potential to property within the
facilities management zone. The assessment. shall be collected b~
the City at the time any application for a development project j
within the zone is submitted. The owner or owners who prepared i
the plan shall be reimbursed for the cost of the plan less the J
owner's or owners' prorata share. No reimbursement shall be mac
unless the plan is approved. Cost of preparation shall not
include interest. ·
(e) As an option to preparation by the owner or group
of owners as provided in subsection (d) the City Council may
decide to direct the City Manager to prepare the facilities
management plan. The cost of preparation shall be advanced to
the City by the requesting owner or owners, assessed to all t~e
owners and reimbursed as provided in subsection (d).
21.90.12S Facilities mana ement olan orocessinc.
a Fac1 1t1es management pans shal be reviewed
according to the following procedure:
' I (1) A completed facilities management 9lan
complying with this chapter, and accompanied by a processinq
in an amount established by City Council resolution, ~ay be
submitted to the Planning Director for processing. !: the
fee i
13.
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
I al
9
10
ll
12
131
l4 I I
l5! I I
l6;1
17 !I
18 11
19 11
lj
20 :i
11
21!:
" 22::
23!!
11
24 ·1
25 ,I
26 ::
:I
27
28 i
• I
the Planning Director deter-mines that the plan ccrr,pUes wi t:1
provisions of Section 21.90.110 the director shall set a
facilities management plan for public hearing before t~e
Commission within sixty days of receipt of a corr,plete
?lanr.:.:-:,;;
:
I application.
(2) The hearing shall be noticed according to t:ie I
provisions of Section 21.S4.060(2). A staff report containinc !
recommendation on the plan shall be prepared and furnished to· i:.!".et
i;,ubl~c, the applicant, and the Planning Commission prior to the i
hearing.
(3) The Planning Commission shall hear and
consider the application for a facilities management plan and
shall by resolution prepare recommendations and findinqs for the
City Council. The action of the Commission shall be filed wit:1
the City Clerk, and a copy shall be mailed to the owners within
the facility zone.
(4) When the Planning Commission action is filed
with the City Clerk, the Clerk shall set the matter for public
hearing before the City Council. The hearing shall be noticed
according to the provisions of Section 21.54.060(2). j
(S) The City Council shall hear the matter, .and
after considering the findings and recommendations of the
Planning Commission, may approve, conditionally approve or d~ny
facilities management plan. The City Council may include in the
resolution adopting the facilities management plan any fees or
facilities improvement requirements which it deems necessary to
impose on development projects within the zone in order to
implement the citywide facilities and improvement plan and the
local facilities management plan.
(b) A facilities management plan may be amended
following the same procedures for the original adoption.
(c) A local facilities management plan shall be
considered a project for the purposes of Title 19 of this Code. ,
Environmental documents should be processed concurrently with th~ plan. · ·
21.90.130 !mclementation of facilities and imcrove~e~ts
reauirements.
(a) To ensure that the provisions of this chacter and
the general plan are met the following shall apply: i
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter n9
development permit shall be approved unless the map or oermit is
consistent with the local facilities manage!Tlent ~lan and unless
provision for all facilities and improvements related to the
development project are provided or funded.
(2) No building permit shall be issued unless all
applicable fees, including but not limited to, public facilities
fees, bridge and thoroughfare fees, traffic impact fees,
facilities management fees, school fees, park-in-lieu fees, sewe~
fees, water fees, or other development fees identified in the ·
citywide facilities and improvements plan and local facilities
!Tlanagement plan and adopted by the City Council have first =:een
paid or provision for their payment has been made to the
satisfaction of the City Council.
14 •
145
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
ll
12
13
14.
15
161 1,I
I
1a;: ,,.
I ,.
19il
2oil I,
21li ,j 22:i
23'1 I
241 I
Ii 25 :;
26
27
• 28
'I
(b) The citywide facilities and improvement plan and
the local facility management plan process is part of the Citv's
ongoing planning effort. It is anttcipated that amend~ents to
the plans may be necessary. Adoption of a facilities management
plan does not establish any entitlement or right to any
particular general plan or zoning design•tion or any particula~
development proposal. The citywide facilities and improvements
plan and the local facilities management plans are guides to
ensure that no development occurs unless adequate facilities or
improvements will be available to meet demands created by
development. The City Council may initiate an amendment to any
of the plans at any time if in its discretion it deteniines that
an amendment is necessary to ensure adequate facilities and
improvements.
(c) If at any tinie it appears to the satisfaction of
the City Manager that facilities or i.r.tprovements within a
facilities management zone or zones are inadequate to accommodate
any further developnient within tha_t zone or that the performance
standards adopted pursuant to Section 21.90.100 are not beinq ~et
he shall immediately re~ort the deficiency to the Council. If
the Council determines that a deficiency exists then no further
building or development permits shall be issued within the
affected zone or zones and development shall cease until an
amendment to the citywide facilities and illlprovernents plan or j'
applicable local facilities management plan which addresses the
deficien·cy ·is approved by the City Council and the perforn,ance
standard is met.
(d) The Planning Director shall monitor the developmen
activity for each local facilities management zone and shall
prepare an annual report to the City Council consisting of ma9s,
graphs, charts, tables and text and which includes a
developniental activity analysis, a facilities and L~provements
adequacy analysis, a facility revenue/expenditure analysis and
reconimendation for any ar.iendments to the facilities management
plan. The co~tent of the annual report ·shall be established ~Y
the City Council.
(e) The City Council shall annually review the citywidl
facilities and improvements plan at the time it considers the
City's capital improvement budget.
21.90.140 Obligation to oav fees or install
improvements reauired by any other law. I
Nothing 1n this chapter shall be construed as ·
relieving a builder, developer or subdivider frorn any ~ublic
improvement requirement, dedication reauirement or fee
requirement which is imposed pursuant to Titles 13, 18, 20 or 21
of this code or pursuant to any City Council policy.
21.90.150 Imolementina guidelines.
The City Council may adopt any guidelines it deems
necessary to implement this chapter.
21.90.160 Exclusions. i·
(al Development proposals which consist of facilities, i
15.
146
Q < aa I "' ~ a: a: .. < <:II
c;· '\I < ]j
. ;;: 0 -= < '= (.,) 2 ~ "" -(.,) -~"" ~ % ... ~ Q ... % < ~a-~
--..I >-= < < ,. (.,)
u
;1
I
I ll
2! I
I
3:
4
5
6
7/
I ' 8
9
10
ll
12
13
I
14ij
15 :1
•I
161
i
17!
I
18 I' ,I
19 11
20 ::
21'.! ., :,
22-1
23 :1
24: I
25 i,
26 :1
27 '1
28
or structures constructed by a city, county, special district,
state, or federal government or any agency, department, or
subsidiary thereof for governmental purposes are excluded f~cm
the provisions of this chapt~r. This exclusion shall not a99ly
to development proposals to which a "°ssessory interest tax wculc
be applicable.
(b) Tentative maps the application for which was
accepted before August 6, 1985 ~ay be approved without complyin9
with the plans adopted pursuant to this Chapter but any other
development permits or building permits for the project shall ":e
subject to the reauirements of the plans. The tentative map
shall be subject to Section 21.90.030.
21.90.170 Council actions, fees, notice.
(a) Whenever this chapter requires or permits an
action or decision of the City Council, that action or decision
shall be accomplished by a resolution.
(b) The City Council shall establish ap9lication and
processing fees for the submission and processing of facilities
management plans and for any other request made under Section
21.90.100, 21.90.120 or 21.90.140.
{c) Whenever written notice is required to be given
to property owners under this section the notice shall be mailed
by first class mail to the owners shown on the last equalized
assessment roll.
21.90.180 Exciration of chapter.
This chapter shall expire on June 30, 2001 unless it is
extended or reenacted on or before that date.
21.90.190 Severabilitv. If any section, subsection,
sentence, clause or phrase of the ordinance codified in this
chapter is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional
by the decision of any ~uurt of competent jurisdiction, such
decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining (.)Ortions
of the ordinance codified in this chapter. The City Council ,
declares that it would have passed the ordinance codi_fied in this
chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase
thereof, irrespective of the fact that any part thereof be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
✓ SECTION 2: ~he City Council makes the following
findings:
l. Since January 1985, the City of Carlsbad has been i
undertaking a comprehensive review of the Land Use Element of its
General Plan. As part of that review a Council appointed
Citizens Committee prepared a comprehensive report and
recommendation to the City Council. That report was subject to
public hearings by both the Planning Commission and City Council.
Included in the recoml'l'lendations of the Citizens Committee wei:e :
recommendations that no new development should occur unless
16.
147
i :I
l l:
! aj
I
31
41 i
' 5!
6
7
ai
91
101
11
12
Q C ID I 13 "' ... a:: a:: ,c • --II C 14!1 \ -.z -CZ: ~0
CD 8 C !!r 15!1 2~ ... . ... <J ! ... >.., . z ... I a l6i ... z <
IJ ! -Ill I ! ~ ~ 171 > a: C C > <J i; -G 1a1:
!'
19
20::
21::
·I
22 I
;i 23ii
24!1
25 i1
26 ii
~?71,
28 'i
II
II I,
adequate-public facilities are available concurrently with need
to serve the new development.
2. On August 6, 198S, the City Council adopted Interi~
Ordinance No. 9766, imposing certain temporary land use controls
on property within the City, consistent with the recommendation
of the Citizens Committee. On September 3, 1985, the City
Council adopted Interim Ordinance No. 9771 which extended the
restrictions of Ordinance No. 9766 until July 20, 1986. on 1-
0ecember 10, 1985, the City Council approved in concept several I
land use proposals not contained in the Citizens Committee 1·
report. On January 21, 1986 the City Council adopted Urgency
Ordinance No. 9791 imposing a temporary moratorium on development!
approvals based on the findings contained _in that ordinance. on
April 22, 1986 the City Council revised City Council Policy No. 1
17, based on the findings contained therein. On May 6, 1986 the
City Council adopted Ordinance No. 8107 establishing a traffic
impact fee for the La Costa Area of the City. The City Council
finds that all of these actions plus the adoption of Chapter
21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code are necessary to ensure
adequate public facilities are available to serve any new
development in the City. Without Chapter 21.90 and the
requirements imposed by it, adequate public facilities may not b
available to serve new development or building. Development or
building without public facilities is contrary to the City
General Plan and would be dangerous to the public health and
safety.
3. This action of the City Council is consistent with i
long standing policies and objectives of the City to ensure :
adequate public facilities wifnin Carlsbad. This action will
protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of i
Carlsbad by ensuring safe streets, adequate water, sewer and
drainage facilities, su-iicient fire protection and recreation
facilities.
4. This action is consistent with the City's policy to!
provide housing opportunities for all economic sectors of the 11 community, because sufficient opportunities for new housing
continue to exist within the City and Chapter 21.90 does not
1
1
affect the number of houses which may be built. In addition,
develop~ent of housing for low and moderate income persons and I
families would most likely occur in areas of the City which are i
designated for highest development priority. By encouraging 1 development of infill areas first, where the infrastructure is 1
already existing, the cost of housing may be reduced• l'
s. Because any new development affects public facility
availability it is necessary to impose the fees and charges whic,
will be used to provide public facilities on any new building inl
the City. The Council finds that failure to impose the fees and 1
charges on any new building in the City will adve-rsely affect thJ
public health and safety by reducing the safety of its City's :
streets, increasing the burden on water, sewer, drainage and fir~
17.
148
I
I l'.
a
9
10
111 I
121
la,:
19·
20 ·
21
22,
·I
23:i ii
'I 24il
25: I
27,
28 ·:
i
II ·I
f aci_l ities, and by overcrowding existing schools, parks and
recreatiQnal facilities.
6. Adoption of Chapter 21.90 will not adversely af:ec:
the regional welfare. By ensuring that adeauate and safe ~1.iblic
facilities and improvements will exist to serve all of the
development in Carlsbad and because many of these facilities and
improve~ents are used by persons residing in neighboring ar~as
and cities the safety and welfare of the whole region is
enhanced.
SECTION 3: The City Council intends to implement the
growth management program contained in Chapter 21.90 by follo·.,i:-1qi
-! the work program in Exhibit A which is hereby made a pa rt of th i si
ordinance. The City Council may adjust the work program without
amending this ordinance as they determine necessary to accomplish
effective growth management for the City of Carlsbad.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall be effective
I
thirty days after its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify!
I to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be published at!
' I least once in the Carlsbad Journal within fifteen cays after its :
i
adoption. The fees created by Section 21.90.0S0 of this
ordinance shall be effec:;.ive as to building permits for single oa
multifamily residential projects 60 days after the adoption of
this ordinance.
INTRODUCED ANO FIRST READ at a regular meeting of the
. I
Carlsbad City Council held on the ,, 24th I cay of _J_u_n_e _____ ,.
1986 and thereafter
18.
11J9
!
5:
6
7
I a
9
10 /
11
12
1:51
' 1411
15
16
17
18
19
20,:
2lli
;I
22:1
I
23' I
241
I
25 j'
26i
27
.28
i
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of said City
Council held on the day of ----___ J_ul~v.._ ___ , 1986, by the lst
following vote, to wit:
ATTEST:
AYES: Council ~embers Casler, Lewis, Kulchin, Chick and Peccine
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
150
•
. APPENDIX 3
REFERENCE SOURCES
1. Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, City of Carlsbad,
Revised September 29, 1986
2. Master Drainage Plan for the City of Carlsbad, adopted June,
1980
3. Sewer Master Plan, City of Carlsbad
November, 1976
June, 1984
April, 1985
4. Costa Real Municipal Water District Master Plan, FPhruary,
1985
5. Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan, City of
Carlsbad, June, 1982
. 6. Memo to Planning Commission from Parks and Recreation
Director, dated March 26, 1987
7. Circulation Element of the General Plan, City of Carlsbad
8. Standard Design Criteria for the Design of Public Works
Improvements in the City of Carlsbad, 1984
9. Draft Barton-Aschman Traffic Study, March, 1987
10. Capital Improvement Program Budget, 1986-1987
11. Capital Improvement Program, 1987-1991
151
1
2
3
4
5·
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPENDIX 4
· PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2650
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
.CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ZONE 3 ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF AGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON, NORTH OF
AND INCLUDING THE ENCINA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, EAST
OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN TO A POINT JUST EAST OF PASEO DEL
NORTE.
APPLICANT: CITY OF CARLSBAD
CASE NO.: LOCAL FACILIITES MANAGEMENT PLAN -ZONE 3
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the
City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 8797
adopting the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan
establishing facility zones and performance standards for public
facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council passed Resolution No. 9808
requiring the processing of a Local Facilities Management Plan,
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 18th day of
March, 1987, and on the 15th day of April, 1987, hold a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said
request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and
considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all persons
desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all factors
relating to the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A)
B)
That the above recitations are true and correct.
That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing,
the Commission APPROVES Local Facilities Management Plan -
Zone 3, based on the following findings and subject to the
following conditions:
1-52
Findings:
l.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3 is
consistent with the Land Use Element, the Public Facilities
Element, and the other Elements contained in Carlsbad's
General Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 3 is
consistent with Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code
(Growth Management), and with the adopted Citywide Facilities
and Improvements Plan.
That the Local Facilities Management Plan and the conditions
contained therein will promote the public safety and welfare
by ensuring that public facilities will be provided in
conformance with the adopted performance standards.
· The .Local Facilities Management Plan will control the. timing
and locations of growth by tying the pace of development to
the provision of public facilities and improvements.
The Plan will prevent growth unless public facilities and
service.a are available in conformance with the adopted
performance standards.
13 Conditions:
14 1)
15
16
17 Ill/
18 Ill/
19 J / / / /
201 Ill/
Ill/ 21
22 Ill/
231 Ill/
24 Ill/
25 Ill/
26 Ill/
/Ill
Approval is granted for Local Facilities Management Plan -
Zone 3 as contained in the Plan titled Local Facilities
Management Plan Zone 3, dated March 4, 1987, attached hereto,
and incorporated herein by reference.
27
2al PC RESO NO. 2650 -2-
153
1
2
3
4
5.
6
7
8
9
10
ll
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commissi0n of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on
the 15tn aay of April, 1987, by the following vote, to wit:
ATTEST:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Chairperson Marcus, Hall, Schramm & Schlehuber.
Commissioners: McFadden & McBane.
Commissioner Holmes.
ABSTAIN: None.
MARY
CARLS
CUS, Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION
13 PLANNING DIRECTOR(_:,N
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 PC RESO NO. 2650 -3-
28
154
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
· 18
19 I
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 9084 -----
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT ZONE 3.
WHEREAS, a local facilities management plan has been
prepared for local facilities management zone 3 in acco.rdance with
Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on March 18, 1987 and
April 15, 1987 hold duly notice public hearings as required by law
to consider said plan and at the conclusion of the hearing adopted
Resolution No. 2650 making findings and recommending that the City
Council adopt a plan; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaratton was issued by the Planning .
Director on April 22, 1987 and approved by the Planning Commission
on April 15, 1987 indicating that the local facilities management
plan is not anticipated to have any significant adverse impact on
the environment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at their meeting of May 19, 1987
held a duly noticed public hearing and considered all the t~stimony
and arguments of anyone desiring to be heard,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Carlsbad, California as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
2. That the findings of the Planning CQmmission in
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2650 constitute the findings of
the City Council.
3. That the local facilities management plan for zone 3
dated March 4, 1987 on file with the City Clerk and incorporated
155
(. , .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
herein by reference is hereby approved. Any development
occurring within the boundaries of zone 3 shall comply with all the
terms and conditions of said plan.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the
Carlsbad City Council held on the 19th day of _M_a_y ___ , 1987
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Members Lewis, Kulchin, Pettine, Mamaux and Larson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
11 C
12 ATTEST:
13·
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(SEAL)
-2-
156