HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-11-03; City Council; ; Consideration of a mixed-use, density bonus development project consisting of 294 residential units and 10,000 square feet of specialty commercial uses on 20.65 acres at (2)1
Teri Delcamp
To:Teri Delcamp
Subject:FW: Marja Acres Development - Please read out loud
-----Original Message----- From: Diane Rivera <dianariver@aol.com> To: matt.hall@carlsbadca.gov <matt.hall@carlsbadca.gov>; keith.blackburn@carlsbadca.gov <keith.blackburn@carlsbadca.gov>; priya.bhat-patel@carlsbadca.gov <priya.bhat-patel@carlsbadca.gov>; council@carlsbadca.gov <council@carlsbadca.gov>; cori.schumacher@carlsbadca.gov <cori.schumacher@carlsbadca.gov>; scott.chadwick@carlsbadca.gov <scott.chadwick@carlsbadca.gov>; teri.delcamp@carlsbadca.com <teri.delcamp@carlsbadca.com> Cc: Diane Rivera <dianariver@aol.com> Sent: Tue, Sep 22, 2020 9:50 am Subject: Marja Acres Development - Please read out loud
Mayor Matt Hall Mayor Pro Tem, Keith Blackburn
Dr. Priya Bhat-Patel Cori Schumacher
Scott Chadwick, City Manager Teri Del Camp, Principle Planner
RE: Marja Acres Development
Dear Mayor Hall, Council Members, City Manager, Teri Del Camp,
The Planning Commission approved the Marja Acres project meeting based upon only
minimum requirements and policies put forth by the Carlsbad Growth Management Plan
regarding key aspects: Some areas of major concern:
Not one Senior Commissioner or Senior representative was invited to be part of
this planning process.
Infrequent bus service to or near a major transportation hub
Access close to shopping, recreation, worship
Comprehensive Soil Testing contamination around the complete acreage
Traffic flow design along the El Camino Real at Kelly St. – Not Safe
Walkability from the Senior Housing to other parts of the complex
A lack of sizing up the Traffic grading situation and/or making adjustments
Increasing Senior Housing unit to a minimum not less than a 600 Sq Ft. area
Accessible and adequate parking for the Senior housing complex along with
guest parking.
Providing a solution for inadequate bus service in the area for all residents
Accepting a Left turn lane into the complex traveling from the South as safe
EXHIBIT 14
2
Omitting a solution for creating a Right-hand lane turn traveling South on the El
Camino into the project.
Inadequate clothes washing facilities
City Council Members, please provide:
Provide Staff enough time and budget
Set a firm date to review and update Carlsbad City Growth Management plan
1. Review Federal, State and Local laws and update accordingly
2. Consider the housing needs for this current Covid19 challenging
environment. If the mandate is “minimum requirement” is listed, nothing more
will be realized.
3. Adopt and adhere to the new Traffic methodologies at every location
4. Resolve that this new plan fit the needs of a growing Carlsbad citizen post
COVID19 for today and the for seeable future.
In my opinion, this meeting was an exercise in futility!! The planning commission
meetings and all their work, all the letters written pro and con from those of us who
thought this was time for Public Comment and a chance to see some changes, 4 years of
expense and planning a project, no agreed upon acknowledgement from the developer
about those things that they said they would consider changing, and then finally, only to
have a vote to approve this project on a threat of a lawsuit. In the end, there was a time
pressure to make a decision to vote to Accept or Deny. The developer was due the right to
a vote this night. This has to change!!
Important points:
Senior housing cannot wait for years and years for promised Shopping Centers to
be built close by.
Public transportation is not TRULY adequate for Seniors
Seniors need to shop where they can stretch their dollar.
Everyone needs a walkable solution to church, doctors, the beach from this site
Few commissioners spoke up and out and were ignored. I thank them
Thank you ALL for your time and attention in this important matter.
Diane Rivera
92008
Carlsbad Growth Management Plan
https://cityadmin.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=35807
3
Carlsbad Traffic Analysis Coming
https://thecoastnews.com/changes-to-carlsbad-traffic-analysis-coming/
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
1
Teri Delcamp
Subject:FW: Draft letter to Planning Commission regarding TIAs in development applications
Attachments:Carlsbad TIA Guidelines FINAL- April 2018.pdf
From: Scott Chadwick
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2020 9:01 AM
To: Geoff Patnoe <Geoff.Patnoe@carlsbadca.gov>; Celia Brewer <Celia.Brewer@carlsbadca.gov>; Paz Gomez
<Paz.Gomez@carlsbadca.gov>; Jeff Murphy <Jeff.Murphy@carlsbadca.gov>; Gary Barberio
<Gary.Barberio@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: FW: Draft letter to Planning Commission regarding TIAs in development applications
Scott Chadwick
City Manager
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
www.carlsbadca.gov
Facebook | Twitter | You Tube | Pinterest |Enews
From: Steve Linke <splinke@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 2:01 PM
To: Scott Chadwick <Scott.Chadwick@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: Draft letter to Planning Commission regarding TIAs in development applications
Hi Scott,
I hope you are doing well. From my perspective, conditions have continued to improve (with occasional hiccups) in the
transportation department. However, I am troubled by the handling of traffic impact analyses (TIAs) in development
applications by the planning/development departments. As a result, I have drafted a letter I plan to send to the Planning
Commission that focuses on one recent example—Marja Acres. I have tried to broach these subjects with staff
members, but I have found their answers unsatisfactory.
I understand that you may not be pleased with this, and that my involvement may not be welcome. However, given
what I have seen and heard over the last several months, this is a new area of commitment for me. I thought I would
give you a chance to review the letter in advance, if you care to do that, although I understand that you have a lot of
things going on.
Best,
Steve
@)
2
Dear Planning Commissioners,
I want to follow up with you on problems with traffic impact analysis (TIA) studies being presented to you in
development applications. I feel there are serious biases that need to be addressed, and I think the best approach is to
bring them out into the sunlight. As a fellow commissioner and someone who has studied traffic issues in Carlsbad for
almost a decade, I hope you will read on and follow me a short distance into the “weeds” on this topic. And, if you have
any questions, comments, or doubts—or if you get a different story from somebody else—please contact me for follow‐
up.
One major problem I raised with the Marja Acres TIA was the last‐minute reduction of the project’s average daily vehicle
trips (ADT) from the more realistic 2,334 ADT figure contained in the final environmental impact report (EIR) to the
ridiculously low 901 ADT contained in the Local Mobility Analysis (LMA). This change was driven by an artificial increase
in the number of trips subtracted from the total based on existing traffic at the project site. However, the 2,334 ADT
figure is based on subtraction of actual traffic counts at the driveways going to the existing businesses, while the 901
ADT figure is based on the use of a SANDAG estimator that used generic business types and square footages to estimate
the subtracted ADT.
During the 9/16/2020 public hearing, staff claimed that this was not a shenanigan, and that they were required by
Carlsbad’s TIA Guidelines to use the SANDAG estimator to re‐calculate the subtracted trips. But that is just more
shenanigans. While claiming they had to follow the TIA Guidelines for this purpose in the LMA, staff simultaneously
argued in the final EIR that they were not required to follow the TIA Guidelines (in order to avoid accountability for not
having executed the required TIA Scoping Agreement with the Marja Acres developer).
But even if we ignore these completely contradictory statements about the necessity to follow the TIA Guidelines, if we
assume (correctly) that staff did have to follow them, they do not require the use of the SANDAG estimator. The TIA
Guidelines indicate that the estimator should be “considered” for use, but many other alternative approaches are
suggested, and it is clear in the guidelines that the city is supposed to work with the developer to come up with the most
accurate method. Thus, it was neither necessary nor appropriate to discard the actual traffic count data in favor of an
estimate known to be inaccurate for the existing conditions. I encourage you to read the entire Traffic Generation
portion (Section 5) of the TIA Guidelines (attached) to come to your own conclusions.
And that unnecessary and inappropriate decision has serious consequences, including the following:
It reduces the traffic impact fee (TIF) to be collected from the developer by about $100,000, because the TIF is
tied to ADT.
Beyond the modest and highly dubious vehicle miles traveled (VMT) mitigation described in the (EIR), the
developer is only being required to add a trash can and bench to one bus stop (that has almost no ridership),
and a small bike rack and repair station in the project. These conditions will not even come close to mitigating
the over 2,000 ADT the project will add to the already failing southbound El Camino Real facility.
It significantly under‐estimates the number of vehicles that will be added to the El Camino Real left turn lane at
Kelly Drive, preventing the developer from being compelled to lengthen it to mitigate the congestion and safety
problems that will develop there. The length of the existing turn lane is also over‐stated by about 35 feet in the
LMA (it includes most of the “taper” area rather than just the full‐width storage area), further contributing to
this problem.
It under‐estimates the number of vehicles that will be added to the already failing El Camino Real/Cannon Road
intersection, preventing the developer from being compelled to contribute to the solution to that problem—the
College Boulevard extension.
Another major issue in the Marja Acres TIA is the usage of a commercial land use in the neighboring Robertson Ranch
development to provide a significant “mixed‐use” VMT reduction for Marja Acres. A pattern is emerging in Carlsbad, in
which mixed‐use developments are proposed, and the developer is given credit for that approach. But then the
3
developer builds the residential portion first, and the commercial portion sits vacant for a long time and is often
eventually converted to residential. The Marja Acres application raises this to a new level by claiming credit for a
commercial mixed‐use that is not even in their development or under their control.
Further, it is my understanding under CEQA statutes and case law that areas that are “permitted” can be assumed to be
completed for the purposes of an environmental report, but areas that are not yet permitted (hypotheticals) cannot be
included. The Robertson Ranch site has sat unpermitted for several years—and it may never be developed as a
commercial site. Therefore, the mixed‐use VMT credit taken in the Marja Acres EIR appears to be inappropriate.
At the very least, there should be accountability. For example, the Marja Acres developer could be required to post a
bond for a backup mitigation plan that they would recover only if the Robertson Ranch commercial area actually gets
built and the increased transit ridership cited in the EIR materializes within a reasonable time.
Finally, the process has been very biased. The TIA in the original draft EIR deceptively claimed that the project would
have no significant impact on vehicle level of service (LOS) on El Camino Real. After I pointed out that fatal flaw, staff
allowed the developer to prematurely switch to a VMT approach to assess vehicle impact. The developer was given
special access to incomplete VMT methods and Growth Management Plan traffic monitoring results that had never been
reviewed by the T&MC or City Council, despite repeated requests from me to see those items. They were also allowed to
use a far more beneficial VMT method (travel demand model run), even though their development did not meet the
criteria for that approach. And other developments that were under review and conducting their TIAs concurrent with
Marja Acres were allowed to continue to use the LOS method, because that benefitted them.
Staff relies on creative re‐interpretations of the TIA Guidelines to decide what provisions they want to follow and when.
And they variously claim that they must follow or do not have to follow the TIA Guidelines at all, depending on what is
convenient or beneficial to developers for the particular time or circumstance. This results in a series of illogical, self‐
contradictory statements, exemplified by the Marja Acres EIR and LMA. While I understand the desire to assist
developers in getting their projects approved, there is also a duty to be unbiased, uniformly apply the rules, and act on
behalf of the public in a transparent way, as well.
To be clear, I am not opposed to the Marja Acres project or any other specific development project. I am only trying to
fulfil my commitment as a member of the Traffic and Mobility Commission (T&MC)—to enhance safe and efficient
mobility in Carlsbad. But that means proactively anticipating future issues, identifying necessary projects, and having
funding available for those projects. And that necessitates that staff abides by the rules, applies the rules uniformly to all
projects, releases reliable TIAs, and requires developers to pay their fair shares for their impacts. When that does not
happen, as is the case here, taxpayers will unnecessarily have to cover the costs.
I requested as part of our work plan that the T&MC be tapped to review the TIA portions of development applications
like this to assist the Planning Commission, which has to deal with many other environmental components. Although it
was acknowledged that was possible, it has not been done. Therefore, I will continue providing my own analyses as an
individual. While state laws restrict your ability to completely reject many residential housing applications, those same
state laws allow collection of fair and reasonable fees to ensure that there is sufficient infrastructure to support the
developments. Consistent with these goals, I think the Planning Commission should ask these tough questions and
demand compliance before approving development applications.
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
CITY OF CARLSBAD
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
GUIDELINES
April 2018
{'city of
Carlsbad
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 2 | Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................................... 3
PURPOSE & OBJECTIVES OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSES .............................................................. 5
TIA SCOPING REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 9
SCENARIOS TO BE STUDIED ......................................................................................................................... 16
TRAFFIC GENERATION ................................................................................................................................. 17
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT METHODOLOGY............................................................................. 19
EVALUATION METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................... 20
SIGNIFICANCE OF AUTO IMPACTS TO CONSIDER MITIGATION .................................................................... 29
SIGNIFICANCE OF PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND TRANSIT SYSTEM IMPACTS TO CONSIDER MITIGATION ...... 33
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Types of Transportation Impact Analysis Report Required & Elements to be Included ............................... 13
Table 2: Analysis Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 20
Table 4: Roundabout Level of Service Thresholds ...................................................................................................... 22
Table 5: MMLOS Level of Service Thresholds ............................................................................................................. 24
Table 6: Measure of Significant Project Traffic Impacts Roadways Subject to the Vehicle MMLOS Standard ........... 30
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: MMLOS Required Analysis by Mobility Element Roadway .......................................................................... 11
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Scoping Agreement
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
1.
2.
3.
4.
s.
6.
7.
8.
9.
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 3 | Page
BACKGROUND
Projects in the City of Carlsbad may require an analysis and evaluation of project-specific transportation
impacts to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City regulations. These
Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines provide direction for this review consistent with the General
Plan Mobility Element vision that “seeks to enhance vehicle, walking, bicycling, and public transportation
systems options within Carlsbad, and improve mobility through increased connectivity and intelligent
transportation management.” The Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines define the process used to
review projects to reflect the Carlsbad Community Vision core values related to sustainability,
neighborhood revitalization, access to recreation, active transportation, and healthy lifestyles.
The Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines eliminate the requirement to evaluate intersections using
methodologies based on auto delay that have historically been used in the City of Carlsbad consistent with
the following statement taken from the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research website:
Governor Brown signed Senate Bill (SB) 743 (Steinberg, 2013), which creates a process to change
the way that transportation impacts are analyzed under CEQA. Specifically, SB 743 requires OPR
to amend the CEQA Guidelines to provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating transportation
impacts. Particularly within areas served by transit, those alternative criteria must “promote the
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks,
and a diversity of land uses.” (Public Resources Code Section 21099(b)(1).) Measurements of
transportation impacts may include “vehicle miles traveled, vehicle miles traveled per capita,
automobile trip generation rates, or automobile trips generated.” (Ibid.) Once the CEQA Guidelines
are amended to include those alternative criteria, auto delay will no longer be considered a
significant impact under CEQA. (Id. at subd. (b)(2).) Transportation impacts related to air quality,
noise and safety must still be analyzed under CEQA where appropriate. (Id. at subd. (b)(3).)
(http://www.opr.ca.gov/ceqa/updates/sb-743/)
While the analysis of auto delay will no longer be required to comply with CEQA, the Growth Management
Program (GMP) established by the City of Carlsbad in 1986 requires an evaluation of roadway facilities.
The GMP ensures that “development does not occur unless adequate public facilities and services exist or
will be provided concurrent with new development.” The Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan (last
amended August 22, 2017) states that “when individual development projects are considered, a public
facilities adequacy analysis will be provided as part of the report on the project to ensure that it is
consistent with both the Citywide and Local Zone Plan.” The Transportation Impact Analysis reports on
the adequacy of the transportation facilities according to the following performance standards
established in the current Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan:
Implement a comprehensive livable streets network that serves all users of the system – vehicles,
pedestrians, bicycles and public transit. Maintain LOS D or better for all modes that are subject to
this multi-modal level of service (MMLOS) standard, as identified in Table 3-1 of the General Plan
Mobility Element, excluding LOS exempt intersections and streets approved by the City Council.
These concepts are codified in Section 21.90.080 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management)
that states:
-~~---------------------------{city of California 1. Carlsbad
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 4 | Page
If at any time after preparation of the local facilities management plan the performance standards
established by a plan are not met then no development permits or building permits shall be issued
within the local zone until the performance standard is met or arrangements satisfactory to the
City Council guaranteeing the facilities and improvement have been made.
An annual Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) was also established as part of the Growth Management
Plan to monitor the transportation facilities according to the established performance standards at that
time. The TMP historically evaluated key intersections and roadway segments using traffic data collected
each summer reflecting traditional morning and afternoon peak hour traffic conditions. The findings and
recommendations were summarized in an annual TMP report, which provided the basis for determining
if the annual growth in traffic was compliant with the GMP. The GMP monitoring program will be updated
to be consistent with these Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines.
In 2015, the City of Carlsbad adopted the General Plan Update (GPU) Mobility Element, which includes a
“Livable Streets Vision and Strategies” section. It is consistent with the California Complete Streets Act
(AB-1358) which requires cities in California to plan for a balanced, multi-modal transportation system
that meets the needs of all travel modes. It is a fundamental shift in how the city will plan and design the
street system viewing streets as a public space that serves all users of the system (e.g., elderly, children,
bicycles, pedestrians). The Mobility Element recognizes that each street within the city is unique given its
geographic setting, adjacent land use, and the desired use of that facility. It identifies a street typology
(Fig. 1) appropriate for the uniqueness of the street and identifies which modes of travel (pedestrian,
bicycle, vehicles, transit) should be accommodated on that street. According to the Mobility Element,
vehicular level of service “will be determined by the most recent version of the Highway Capacity Manual.”
The Mobility Element also established a new Multi-Modal Level of Service (MMLOS) methodology for
pedestrian, bicycle and transit transportation modes.
The Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines provide a detailed description of the methodology to be
followed in identifying project impacts for applicable transportation facilities in compliance with
applicable federal, state and local requirements (e.g., CEQA, GMP and the 2015 General Plan Mobility
Element).
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 5 | Page
PURPOSE & OBJECTIVES OF TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSES
2.1 Purpose of Transportation Impact Analyses
Transportation Impact Analyses (TIA’s) forecast, describe, and analyze the effect a development will have
on the existing and future circulation infrastructure for all transportation modes. The purpose of the TIA
is to assist engineers and planners in both the development community and public agencies when making
land use and other development decisions. A TIA quantifies the changes in traffic levels and translates
these changes into transportation system impacts in the vicinity of a project. These findings can then be
used to determine project specific improvements or mitigation measures to offset the project’s impacts
to the transportation system. If certain circumstances are met the General Plan Update allows some street
facilities to be exempt from the LOS standard as approved by the City Council.
2.2 Objectives of TIA Guidelines
The following guidelines were prepared to assist the City of Carlsbad in promoting consistency and
uniformity in TIAs. All Mobility Element roadways, all State routes and freeways (including metered and
unmetered ramps), and all pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities that are impacted should be included
in each study.
The following Mobility Element Implementing Policies provide direction for the Traffic Impact Analysis
Guidelines:
• Apply and update the city’s multi-modal level of service (MMLOS) methodology and guidelines…. Utilize the
MMLOS methodology to evaluate impacts of individual development projects and amendments to the
General Plan on the city’s transportation system. (Policy 3-P.3)
• Implement the city’s MMLOS methodology and maintain LOS D or better for each mode of travel for which
the MMLOS standard is applicable… (Policy 3-P.4)
• Require developers to construct or pay their fair share toward improvements for all modes consistent with
this Mobility Element, the Growth Management Plan, and specific impacts associated with their
development. (Policy 3-P.5)
• Utilize transportation demand management strategies, non-automotive enhancements (bicycle, pedestrian,
transit, train, trails, and connectivity), and traffic signal management techniques as long-term
transportation solutions and traffic mitigation measures to carry out the Carlsbad Community Vision. (Policy
3-P.8)
• Develop and maintain a list of street facilities where specific modes of travel are exempt from the LOS
standard (LOS exempt street facilities), as approved by the City Council. For LOS exempt street facilities, the
city will not implement improvements to maintain the LOS standard outlined in Policy 3-P.4 if such
improvements are beyond what is identified as appropriate at build out of the General Plan... (Policy 3-P.9)
• Require new development that adds vehicle traffic to street facilities that are exempt from the vehicle LOS
standard (consistent with Policy 3-P.9) to implement (Policy 3-P-11):
--;~---------------------------{cityof California 2. Carlsbad
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 6 | Page
- Transportation demand management strategies that reduce the reliance on single-occupancy
automobile and assist in achieving the city’s livable streets vision.
- Transportation systems management strategies that improve traffic signal coordination and improve
transit service
Caltrans has slightly different LOS objectives for State highway facilities. For example, Caltrans has a target
LOS “C” standard for State highway facilities. Caltrans may defer to the lead agency to determine the
appropriate target LOS consistent with the following Mobility Element Implementing Policy:
• Encourage Caltrans to identify and construct necessary improvements to improve service levels in Interstate-
5 and State Route 78. (Policy 3-P.7)
These guidelines are subject to update as future conditions and experience become available.
2.3 Analysis Strategy for Transportation Impact Analysis
The General Plan Update (GPU) Mobility Element states that:
The transportation system envisioned in the 1994 General Plan has largely been realized, with the majority
of the street infrastructure constructed to its ultimate configuration. As the city looks increasingly to infill
development rather than outward expansion, the primary transportation issues relate to protecting and
enhancing the community’s quality of life, as reflected in the core values of the Carlsbad Community Vision.
The community’s vision includes better pedestrian and bicycle connections between neighborhoods,
destinations, and different parts of the community, and a balanced transportation system rather than a
singular focus on automobile movement.
Increasing regional travel demand leads to more trips using City of Carlsbad roadway facilities that neither
originate nor terminate within the City limits (i.e., “cut-through” or “bypass” traffic). The GPU Mobility
Element acknowledged that policies aimed at continuing to expand our roadway facilities to meet ever-
expanding demand is counterproductive and likely to conflict with competing community values and
objectives listed in the city’s Climate Action Plan (CAP). Rather, the City of Carlsbad should best manage
and maintain the transportation facilities planned for and constructed consistent with the City’s General
Plan. As noted above, “auto delay will no longer be considered a significant impact under CEQA.”
Intersection analysis based on auto delay used for planning purposes have been found to produce:
- recommended mitigation measures that induce traffic and therefore increase congestion
- recommended mitigation measures that do not directly resolve a project’s specific impact
- questionable nexus studies
- questionable estimates of reserve capacity
- very specific, but highly inaccurate results (especially in forecasted scenarios)
2.4 Basis for Limiting Delay- Based Intersection LOS
The intersection level of service methodology according to the Highway Capacity Manual involves an
evaluation of the average delay experienced by all vehicles using the intersection. The accuracy of these
average vehicle delay calculations is directly related to the accuracy of very specific traffic data. This
methodology reflects a snapshot in time and is highly appropriate for evaluating intersection geometrics,
determining intersection signal timing, or evaluating design alternatives. However, the generalized traffic
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 7 | Page
data available for planning level decisions does not provide the precision required for this specific level of
service calculation, and may yield unreliable or inconsistent results. That is, it is unrealistic to accurately
forecast the numerous variables that are required to calculate level of service based on delay. Variations
in input variables, variations in peak hour volumes and other factors can result in fluctuations in
intersection level of service from one study to another and across different study scenarios for a given
project.
The delay-based intersection LOS analysis has a critical limitation; it cannot adequately determine how
close traffic volumes are to an operational capacity. The estimate for average delay is related to so many
independent variables that it is not designed to determine when an intersection will reach a specific LOS
threshold. Specifically, the impact of increased traffic volume depends on what movements are impacted.
This means that an intersection experiencing an increase of 10 vehicles turning left at an intersection
could result in a failing LOS result, while an increase of 100 vehicles turning right could improve the overall
intersection LOS (i.e., the added right turn traffic experiencing below average delay offsets the few
vehicles expected to experience above average delay). As noted below, this is the reason why mitigation
measures for traffic impacts to signalized intersections often implement improvements to the right turn
movements.
Using average delay to evaluate transportation impacts to an intersection tends to identify mitigation
measures that don’t directly address the main cause of congestion. Furthermore, the proposed
improvements may not directly correlate to the traffic generated by the specific project. For example, a
significant impact is reported for a proposed project because the traffic at an intersection is forecasted to
increase the average delay beyond the LOS E threshold. For this example, the direct project impact is
identified to be an excessive queue in the westbound left turn lane. However, to reduce the project’s
impact to less than significant, an improvement is identified for the southbound right turn movement
even though it does not have a queuing problem; that is a southbound right-turn overlap improves overall
delay but does not address the excessive queue for the westbound left turn movement. Although the
overall delay in this example is reported to fall below the level of significance, the proposed project does
not include a mitigation measure that directly addresses the project’s impact.
These are the primary reasons why the Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines transitioned from the
granular detail of the intersection LOS methodology based on the Highway Capacity Manual. The City
Traffic Engineer / City Engineer will retain the discretion to add specific intersections to the study area to
be analyzed using a methodology consistent with the latest version of the Highway Capacity Manual.
2.5 New Approach for Evaluating Traffic Impacts
These guidelines shift the focus of auto level of service from the subjective nature of intersection delay
calculations to an approach evaluating traffic impacts using two methodologies:
• a corridor operations analysis based on roadway capacity according to the Highway Capacity Manual and
subject to the LOS standard; and
• a turning movement needs assessment for intersections.
Evaluating corridors allows the City to assess the ability for the existing and future facilities to carry
through traffic (i.e., how is the experience of drivers traveling through several intersections along the
corridor). The methodology proposed for analyzing corridors includes factors that reflect the
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 8 | Page
understanding that signalized intersections tend to be the controlling factor for determining a roadway’s
capacity. The corridor analysis is focused on identifying the need to add travel lanes necessary to serve
the mainline traffic; and a separate evaluation is needed of the capacity of the side streets and turning
lanes at intersections along a corridor.
To address potential operational and capacity issues at signalized intersections, TIA’s will be required to
include an analysis of the queues for left and right turning movements. The queue analysis will determine
if adequate turn lanes and adequate queue storage is provided at the signalized intersections within the
project study area. Queues that exceed capacity affect the carrying capacity of the roadway (i.e.,
automobiles that can’t queue up in the turn lane will block the lanes serving through movements and
reduce main-line capacity). The queue analysis will determine where new turn lanes are needed and
where existing turn pockets may need to be lengthened to improve corridor performance and address
potential safety issues. As stated above, transportation impacts related to safety must still be analyzed
under CEQA where appropriate.
Traffic signal warrants will also need to be conducted for unsignalized intersections in the study area.
2.6 Approach to Mitigating Impacts
The corridor LOS analysis coupled with a turning movement needs assessment will identify the
appropriate roadway facility improvements needed to be identified in the TIA according to the city’s GMP.
The City of Carlsbad recognizes that trying to build its way out of congestion is unsustainable and may
conflict with objectives in the Climate Action Plan and General Plan. The General Plan allows for
exemptions to the levels of service standards when specific criteria are met. Theses exemptions require
mitigation measures that rely on management tools that include: a) Transportation Demand Management
(TDM)1 strategies that provide goods and services to the public in a way that reduces the demand for auto
travel- especially during peak periods; and b) Transportation Systems Management (TSM)2 strategies that
improve traffic flow so that people can travel in autos more efficiently without widening roadways. TIAs
are expected to include mitigation measures that support TDM objectives to provide viable options to
single occupancy vehicle trips and TSM measures that improve the efficiency of the existing roadway
system.
The General Plan prioritized shifting travel modes away from the single occupancy vehicle to shared
mobility choices, such as vanpool, carpool, walking, bicycling and taking transit. These Transportation
Impact Analysis Guidelines integrate the new MMLOS methodology that will be used to determine gaps
in the existing infrastructure for all modes. It also identifies requirements for mitigating project impacts
and providing enhanced and expanded vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities adjacent to the
project site.
1 Also known as “Travel Demand Management” and “Traffic Demand Management”
2 Also known as “Traffic Signal Management” and “Traffic Systems Management”
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 9 | Page
TIA SCOPING REQUIREMENTS
Prior to initiating a TIA, a scope of work shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved by City staff. Special
situations may call for variation from these guidelines, which will be discussed during the scoping process.
When state facilities are included within a project study area, Caltrans and the City of Carlsbad should
agree on the specific methods used in TIAs involving any State Route facilities, including metered and
unmetered freeway ramps.
3.1 Scoping Agreement
Early consultation among the development community, City of Carlsbad, other affected jurisdictions, and
Caltrans is required to establish the base input parameters, assumptions, and analysis methodologies for
the TIA. A Scoping Agreement with City of Carlsbad shall be filed prior to initiating the Transportation
Impact Analysis report (refer to Appendix A of these guidelines).
The Scoping Agreement ensures an understanding of the level of detail and the assumptions required for
the analysis. Always check with City staff for their concerns prior to preparing the initial Scoping
Agreement. For straightforward studies prepared by consultants familiar with these TIA procedures, a
telephone call or e-mail may suffice. For consultants unfamiliar with City requirements or for more
complex projects, a project initiation meeting is recommended prior to submitting or concurrently with
the submittal of the initial Scoping Agreement.
3.2 Facilities to be Included in the Study Area
All projects access points and on-site circulation will be identified in the study area. The geographic extent
of the study area is described for each mode that is subject to evaluation below. All TIAs shall include a
project study map according to Section 3.3 that defines all transportation facilities to be evaluated
according to this section.
The modes that will be evaluated are based on the street typology for roadways connecting the project
to the citywide transportation system and the location of the project. Figure 1 on the following page
illustrates the mode analysis required for each Mobility Element roadway in the City of Carlsbad. The
extent to which the analysis is conducted is described later in these guidelines. The following outlines the
guidelines for determining the geographic area to be examined in the studies:
AUTO:
INTERSECTIONS: All intersections within 0.25 miles of a project access points serving vehicles will be included
in the study area. Additional intersections within 0.25 to 0.5 miles from the project access points may also be
added to the study area at the discretion of the City Engineer / City Traffic Engineer.
ROADWAY SEGMENTS:
• Non-freeway roadway segments that are subject to Auto MMLOS Criteria and expected to experience an
increase in project traffic equal to 50 or more peak-hour trips in either direction of travel.
• Freeway Mainline Segments where the project adds 50 or more peak-hour trips in either direction of travel
• Freeway Entrance and Exit Ramps where the proposed project will add 20 or more peak-hour trips and/or
cause any traffic queues to exceed ramp storage capacities.
--;,~---------------------------{cityof California 3. Carlsbad
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 10 | Page
PEDESTRIAN:
• All pedestrian facilities that are directly connected to project access points will be included in the study area
• All pedestrian facilities adjacent to the project development site that provide direct pedestrian access to
the project site will be included in the study area.
• The analysis of each pedestrian facility will extend in each direction to the nearest intersection or
connection point to a multiuse trail or path. The study area will extend from the project site (northbound
and southbound OR eastbound and westbound) until a Mobility Element Road or Class I trail is reached in
each direction.
• Pedestrian facilities shall include all existing and proposed sidewalks, crosswalks, signalized pedestrian
phases, and ADA-compliant facilities.
• Pedestrian analysis need only be conducted for the side of the street where the project is located unless
the project is located on both sides of the street, in which case both sides of the street should be studied.
• Pedestrian analysis shall be conducted for all roadway segments included in the study area that are subject
to the Pedestrian MMLOS standards (see Figure 1).
BICYCLE:
• All facilities that bicyclists can legally use shall be included in the study area from each project access point
extending in each direction of travel to the nearest intersection, dedicated bicycle facility, or connection
point to a multiuse trail or path. Inventory and evaluation shall include all off-street and on-street bicycle
paths, lanes and routes.
• Bicycle analysis shall be conducted for both directions of travel (e.g., both sides of the street) of each facility
included in the study area.
• Bicycle analysis shall be conducted for roadway segments subject the Bicycle MMLOS standards (see Figure
1).
TRANSIT:
• All existing transit lines and transit stops within a ½ mile walking distances of the project site shall be
included in the study area.
• If the roadways within the study area are not subject to Transit MMLOS standards (see Figure 1) no further
transit analysis is required.
• All transit lines located within a ½ mile walking distance of the project site will be analyzed according to the
Transit MMLOS
• All pedestrian routes linking the project site to a transit line within the ¼ mile walking distance boundary.
• If no transit lines are provided, but the roadways within the study area are identified as subject to transit
MMLOS, the project shall complete the MMLOS worksheet for “No Transit Located within ½ Mile Walk from
Subject Site or Roadway Segment”.
• Transportation Demand Management Measures shall be identified for the project, which may include on-
demand transit, flex or other measures.
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 11 | Page
Figure 1: MMLOS Required Analysis by Mobility Element Roadway
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
~ ,..,
I!! ::,
C, Lt
f I I I I I
California
0
I I •DD
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 12 | Page
3.3 Project Study Area Maps
The project study area shall be clearly reflected in a map included in the TIA report and shall be provided
with the Scoping Agreement. Depending upon the size and complexity of the study area, the study area
map may need to be represented on multiple figures (study roadways, study intersections, etc.).
Facilities that the City Council have identified as exempt from LOS standards must be clearly identified in
the project study area map.
3.4 Vehicle Traffic Data Collection
The vehicle traffic data used in the TIA should generally not be more than 2 years old and should not
reflect a temporary interruption (special events, construction detour, etc.) in the normal traffic patterns
unless that is the nature of the project itself. If recent traffic data are not available, current counts must
be made by the project applicant/consultant. Use of traffic data that does not conform to this
requirement must be approved by the City Engineer / City Traffic Engineer as part of the Scoping
Agreement prior to inclusion in the TIA.
3.5 Report Categories
The type of TIA required for a project is based on consistency with the General Plan, Specific Plan or zoning
as well as the number of vehicular trips generated by the site. The type of TIA required will be determined
during the Scoping Agreement phase of the project.
Table 1 outlines the ADT volume threshold requirements used to determine the type of TIA required and
the elements included in each level of TIA.
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
March 2018 13 | Page
Table 1: Types of Transportation Impact Analysis Report Required & Elements to be Included
Land Use
Forecast Project Generated Auto Trips
<500 ADT
or
<50 peak hour trips
500 to 1,000 ADT
or
50 to 100 peak hour trips
1,000 to 2,400 ADT
or
100 to 200 peak hour trips
>2,400 ADT
or
>200 peak hour trips
Conforms to Approved Specific
Plan or Master Plan Level I
Conforms to General Plan or
Zoning Level I Level III Level V Level VII
Does not Conform to General
Plan or Zoning Level II Level IV Level VI Level VIII
MMLOS
(ped, bike,
transit)
Study Area
Map
Trip
Generation
Table
Trip
Distribution &
Assignment
Figure
Signalized
Intersection
Analysis
Unsignalized
Intersection
Analysis
Scenarios to be Evaluated
LFMP
Specific TIA
Existing
Conditions
Analysis
Cumulative
Conditions
Analysis
Horizon
Year
Analysis
Regional
Travel
Demand
Model Run
Level I
Level II
Level III
Level IV Level V
Level VI
Level VII
Level VIII
Section
Reference:
Section
7.6
Section
3.3
Section
5.0
Section
6.0
Section
7.1
Section
7.2
Section
4.0
Section
3.7
Note: All TIA’s will require MMLOS Analysis. The modes evaluated for each study will be determined by street typology and project location, not total vehicular trips. Refer to Section 3.2
for additional information.
{city of
---------------------------------------Carlsbad Ca l ifornia
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
March 2018 14 | Page
3.6 VMT Analysis
In September 2014, the California Governor signed Senate Bill 743 (SB743), which requires the use of
methods other than LOS to define Transportation Impacts in environmental documents. SB743 Guidelines
published by the Office of Planning and Research has recommended the use of Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) as the replacement for LOS. At the time these guidelines were published, the CEQA checklist had
not been updated to reflect this transition from LOS to VMT. And the San Diego Region had yet to adopt
a method for calculating and reporting impacts related to VMT.
In November 2017, the Governor’s Office of Planning & Research (OPR) released Technical Advisory on
Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, which provides guidance in evaluating transportation impacts
under the SB743 changes to CEQA. The document includes a two-year transition period, which will allow
regional and local agencies to establish methodologies and metrics for identifying impacts using VMT.
Hearings related to the amendments and additions to the State CEQA Guidelines, including changes
related to SB743, will occur in March 2018. Following the hearings, the Natural Resources Agency will
consider all comments and make appropriate changes. The Natural Resources Agency will then consider
the adoption of the new CEQA guidelines.
Local agencies in San Diego County are working toward developing regionally accepted guidelines for
conducting VMT analysis consistent with the requirements of SB743. The SANTEC/ITE Transportation
Mobility Task Force has established a SB743 working group that is drafting and testing methods for
evaluating VMT at both the regional and project level. In addition, SANDAG has published a white paper
on VMT modeling in the region. At the time these Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines were
published, a methodology for evaluating impacts and thresholds of significance related to VMT had not
been adopted for the San Diego region. Until the methodology and thresholds are adopted,
Transportation Impact Analysis reports in the City of Carlsbad may not be required to submit VMT with
their technical analysis. However, the need for and approach to VMT analysis may be required for large
scale projects, specific plans or project that are anticipated to result in a significant change in community
VMT. The need for VMT analysis shall be discussed during the approval of the Scoping Agreement.
The U.S. Department of Transportation published the report Evolving Use of Level of Service Metrics in
Transportation Analysis- California Case Study stating: “…while VMT is a useful umbrella metric for
transportation impacts, it is not designed to be a performance metric for the functioning of the
transportation system. Operating an effective transportation system requires a focus on accessibility for
people and goods to reach destinations in an efficient manner.”
3.7 Local Facility Management Zones
There are 25 local facility management zones in the City of Carlsbad. Each zone has an adopted Local
Facility Management Plan (LFMP), which outlines how the zone will be developed, how it will comply with
the Growth Management standards, and what public facilities will be provided. In addition, the plan
outlines how the facilities will be funded.
Projects that amend the General Plan must conduct an LFMP Specific Traffic Impact Analysis to evaluate
the impacts of the General Plan amendment on the facilities located in local facility management zones.
The study area for the LFMP Specific Traffic Impact Analysis report will be defined as: a) the entire local
facilities management zone where the general plan amendment is located and b) all intersections and
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 15 | Page
roadways in other local facility management zones expected to have auto traffic increase by 20% or more
due to trips generated by the General Plan amendment. The SANDAG Regional Travel Demand Forecast
Model shall be used to determine the extent of the 20% threshold. The scope and extent of the LFMP
study area shall be discussed and confirmed with city staff prior to proceeding with the technical analysis.
All technical analysis for intersections and roadway segments within the LFMP Specific Traffic Impact
Analysis shall conform to the methodologies outlined in these guidelines.
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 16 | Page
SCENARIOS TO BE STUDIED
After documenting existing conditions, both near-term (within approximately the next five years) and
long-term (usually for a 20-year planning horizon or build-out of the area), analyses are needed. All of the
following scenarios shall be addressed in the TIA (unless there is concurrence with the City Traffic Engineer
or City Engineer that one or more of these scenarios may be omitted):
• Existing Conditions – Document existing traffic volumes and peak-hour levels of service in the study area.
The existing deficiencies and potential mitigation should be identified.
• Existing + Proposed Project - Analyze the impacts of the proposed project on top of existing conditions.
This scenario is typically evaluated to determine if the addition of project traffic to existing traffic will
directly impact the existing roadway network.
• Cumulative Conditions – Analyze the cumulative condition impacts from “other” approved and “reasonably
foreseeable” pending projects that are expected to influence the study area as identified by City staff (e.g.,
application on file, project in the pipeline). This is the baseline against which project impacts are assessed.
City of Carlsbad should provide copies of the TIAs for the “other” projects if available. If data is not available
for near-term cumulative projects, an ambient growth factor should be used.
• Cumulative Conditions + Proposed Project – Analyze the impacts of the proposed project on top of existing
conditions and near-term projects (along with their committed or funded mitigation measures, if any).
• Horizon Year (Baseline Condition) – Identify Horizon Year (20+ years) future conditions through the output
of the most recent SANDAG Regional Transportation Demand Model or the model approved by the City
Engineer/City Traffic Engineer in the Scoping Agreement. For projects less than 2,400 new project trips per
day, no new model runs are required. Baseline Horizon Year volumes can be determined using existing
available Horizon Year model data provided by SANDAG for the City of Carlsbad. If the proposed project is
consistent with the land uses represented in the model, the project traffic should be removed from the
Horizon Year forecast volumes to establish the baseline condition. For projects with more than 2,400 new
project trips per day, a new model run will be necessary for the “baseline condition”.
• Horizon Year + Proposed Project – For projects with less than 2,400 new project trips per day, the project
trips shall be added to the Baseline Horizon Year volumes based on trip distribution and assignment
approved by the City Engineer / City Traffic Engineer in the Scoping Agreement. For projects with more
than 2,400 new project trips per day, a new model run will be necessary for the “with project” conditions
to determine both the distribution of traffic (select zone model run) and Horizon Year volumes
In order to use LOS criteria to measure traffic impact significance, proposed model or manual forecast
adjustments must be made to address scenarios both with and without the project. Model data
should be carefully verified to ensure accurate project and “other” cumulative project representation.
In these cases, regional or sub-regional models conducted by SANDAG need to be reviewed for
appropriateness.
-~~---------------------------{cityof California 4. Carlsbad
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 17 | Page
TRAFFIC GENERATION
Use of the SANDAG “Traffic Generators” manual and “(Not So) Brief Guide…” trip generation rates should
first be considered. Next, consider rates from ITE’s latest “Trip Generation” manual or “ITE Journal”
articles. If local and sufficient national data do not exist, conduct trip generation studies at sites with
characteristics similar to those of the proposed project. If this is not feasible due to the uniqueness of the
land use, it may be acceptable to estimate defensible trip rates – only if appropriate documentation is
provided. Refer to the section below on special generators and non-conforming land uses for further
information on methodology for conducting trip generation studies.
Reasonable reductions to trip rates may also be considered, including:
• Pass-by and Diverted Traffic on Adjacent Roadways: SANDAG trip reduction factors may be used.
• Transit Oriented Development Transit Trip Reductions: SANDAG trip reduction factors may be used
for developments within a ¼ mile walking distance to a local transit station. This includes this
Poinsettia, Carlsbad Village and The Shoppes at Carlsbad Transit Center.
• Mixed-use Development Trip Reduction: SANDAG MXD and/or ITE Mixed Use trip reduction methods
may be used for projects where multiple, compatible land uses are located within a project site, within
a densely populated region of the city or within a ¼ mile walking distance of compatible supporting
land uses. It should be noted that a project may be considered mixed use based on the surrounding
environment in addition to the land uses within the project boundary. For example, a retail project
located within a high density residential area may be considered “mixed use” if the site is accessible by
bicycle and by foot and is within ¼ mile of the high density residential area. The applicant shall work
with City staff to determine if a project is considered mixed use and must demonstrate using GIS or
other land use evaluation tool to determine the potential for mixed use trip reduction credits. (e.g. If
a restaurant reduces vehicle trips by 50 patrons, then applicant must show there are 50 residents
within walking distance of the restaurant use).
Caltrans or adjacent jurisdictions may use different trip reduction rates. Early consultation with all
reviewing agencies is strongly recommended. All trip reduction factors shall be discussed in the Scoping
Agreement with justification for the trip reduction approach and application.
Special generators and non-standard land uses are land uses not included in either the SANDAG “Traffic
Generators, (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates”, (April 2002, or most recent
addition) or the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) “Trip Generation Manual” (most recent
edition). They may also be defined as land use types included in these manuals, but the project may have
special circumstances that make the trip generation for the proposed facility unique compared to those
included in these standardized manuals.
For projects with special generators or non-standard land uses, a trip generation study will be submitted
to the City with the scoping letter documenting the proposed trip generation rates. The trip generation
study will include data collected for a similar use within the region or other credible information that can
clearly quantify the trips that may be generated by the proposed use. The data collection methodology
shall be in compliance with ITE Trip Generation Study methodologies outlined in the Institute of
Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual Volume 1: User’s Guide and Handbook. Preparers are
-~~---------------------------{cityof California s. Carlsbad
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 18 | Page
encouraged to contact City staff prior to conducting the trip generation study to confirm assumptions and
methodology. The City will review the trip generation study with the Scoping Agreement and may provide
feedback or request additional information as appropriate prior to accepting the special generator or non-
standard land use trip generation rates.
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 19 | Page
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT METHODOLOGY
Project trips can be assigned and distributed either manually or by the SANDAG model based upon review
and approval of the City Engineer / City Traffic Engineer. The magnitude of the proposed project will
determine which method is employed. All projects generating more the 2,400 new vehicle trips per day
will be required to use SANDAG’s Regional Transportation Demand Model for a select zone analysis to
determine trip distribution. Projects generating less than 2,400 new vehicle trips per day will use the
manual trip distribution method.
If the SANDAG model is used, the centroid connectors should accurately represent project access to the
street network. Preferably the project access points would be consistent with the traffic zone connectors
used in the model. Some adjustments to the output volumes may be needed (especially at intersections)
to smooth out volumes, quantify peak volumes, adjust for pass-by and diverted trips, and correct illogical
output.
If the manual method is used, the trip distribution percentages should be derived based on existing traffic
patterns, similar projects or studies conducted within the study area and professional judgement. Trip
distribution will be submitted with the Scoping Agreement and approved by the City Engineer / City Traffic
Engineer prior to including in the TIA.
-~~---------------------------{cityof California 6. Carlsbad
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 20 | Page
EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
The TIA shall determine the effect that a project will have for each of the previously outlined study
scenarios. Analyses for freeways, roadway segments, intersections, and freeway ramps must be
conducted to determine the transportation impacts associated with planned development or projects and
are pertinent to the credibility and confidence the decision-makers have in the resulting findings,
conclusions, and recommendations.
Table 2 outlines the City approved methodologies for TIA analysis to be used along with some suggested
software packages and options. Any deviations from Table 2 must be included in the Scoping Agreement.
Table 2: Analysis Methodology
Study Location Methodology
Appropriate Software or
Application
Signalized Intersections Queue & Storage Analysis Refer to Section 7.1
Unsignalized Intersections Warrant Analysis MUTCD-CA (latest edition)
Refer to Section 7.2
Roundabouts Delay and queue analysis SIDRA or Rodel, coordinate
directly with City Staff
Refer to Section 7.3
Arterial and Local Streets 2010 Highway Capacity Manual
Urban Street Methodology
Capacity Tables
Refer to Section 7.4
Freeway Segments Caltrans District 11 freeway analysis
methodology (peak hour V/C)
Caltrans Guidelines
Refer to Section 7.5
Freeway Ramp Metering Regional Transportation Impact
Analysis Guidelines/Caltrans
Methodology
Caltrans Guidelines
Refer to Section 7.5
Transit, Pedestrians, and Bicycles City of Carlsbad MMLOS Worksheets City of Carlsbad MMLOS Tool
Refer to Section 7.6
Note: Neither the City of Carlsbad nor Caltrans officially advocate the use of any social software packages, especially since new ones are
being developed all the time. However, consistency with the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) is required based on the City’s General Plan Mobility
Element. The above-mentioned software packages have been utilized locally and found to be consistent with the latest version of the HCM. Because
it is so important to have consistent end results, always consult with all affected jurisdictions, including Caltrans, regarding the analytical
techniques and software being considered (especially if they differ from above) for the TIA.
--;~---------------------------{cityof California 7. Carlsbad
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 21 | Page
7.1 Signalized Intersections
All signalized intersections within the study area are subject to the signalized intersection analysis. The
analysis will address the adequacy of the signalized intersection geometry to serve the existing, forecast
and project traffic through the intersection. As stated previously, all signalized intersection within 0.25
miles of the project auto access driveway or intersection shall be evaluated if the project adds trips to the
left turn or right turning movements at the intersection. The signalized study area will be based on trip
generation and trip assignment for the project. Analysis will be based on the following criteria:
• Left turn queue assessment: Compare the left turn volume with the length of the left turn pocket(s). A
general rule of thumb of one foot per left turning vehicle per lane may be used for this analysis.
• Left turn volume: If the left turn volume exceeds 250 vehicles per hour, a second left turn lane is
recommended.
• Right turn volume: If the right turn volume exceeds 150 vehicles per hour, a dedicated right turn lane is
recommended.
7.2 Unsignalized Intersections
Unsignalized intersections located along corridors subject to Auto MMLOS within the project study area
may require a traffic signal warrant analysis. A warrant analysis is required if:
• The unsignalized intersection provides direct access to the project site, or
• The unsignalized intersection provides direct access to a cumulative project considered in the
Transportation Impact Analysis, or
• The unsignalized intersection has been identified by the City as a potential signalized intersection.
A warrant analysis is not required for right turn in/right turn out only intersections or driveways that are
physically restricted by raised center median.
7.3 Roundabout Analysis
Should a project recommend the construction of a new signalized intersection, the intersection shall be
further analyzed using Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) methodology. If the analysis
indicates that a roundabout should be evaluated, analysis shall be conducted using one of the following
methodologies: SIDRA or RODEL. Both programs provide queue and roundabout performance data that
should be integrated into the traffic analysis report for roundabout controlled intersections. Both
programs provide results that are compatible with HCM 2010 and HCM Edition 6 roundabout capacity
models, allowing the results of this analysis to be consistent with the requirements of the City General
Plan Mobility Element.
According to the Highway Capacity Manual, roundabout operations are defined solely on the control delay
of the intersection which is calculated for each approach as well as for the overall intersection. If the
volume to capacity ratio of an approach exceeds 1.0 however, the overall intersection operation is
determined to be LOS F. Table 4 defines the levels of service for roundabouts.
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 22 | Page
Table 4: Roundabout Level of Service Thresholds
Control Delay (seconds)
Level of Service (LOS)
V/C <1.0 V/C>1.0
0-10 A F
>10-15 B F
>15-25 C F
>25-35 D F
>35-50 E F
>50 F F
Source: Highway Capacity Manual
7.4 Local & Arterial Street Operational Analysis
Vehicular LOS is a general measure of vehicle traffic operating conditions whereby a letter grade, from
LOS A (no congestion) to F (high levels of congestion), is assigned. The flow of vehicles without significant
impediments is considered “stable” whereas when traffic encounters interference that limits the capacity
acutely, the flow becomes “unstable.” These grades represent the perspective of drivers only and are an
indication of the comfort and convenience associated with driving, as well as speed, travel time, traffic
interruptions, and freedom to maneuver. The level of service grades are generally defined as follows:
• LOS A represents free flow travel for vehicles. Individual users are virtually unaffected by other vehicles in
the traffic stream.
• LOS B represents stable flow, but the presence of other users in the traffic stream begins to be noticeable.
• LOS C represents a range in which the influence of traffic density on operations becomes noticeable. The
ability to maneuver within the traffic stream and to select an operating speed is now clearly affected by the
presence of other vehicles.
• LOS D borders on unstable flow. Speeds and ability to maneuver are severely restricted because of traffic
congestion.
• LOS E represents unstable operating conditions at or near the capacity level where maneuverability is
severely limited.
• LOS F is used to define forced or a breakdown traffic flow.
Roadways within the project study area subject to Auto MMLOS standards shall be evaluated using the
most current version of the Highway Capacity Manual, as outlined in the City’s General Plan Mobility
Element (2015). Roadway Capacity Tables derived from the Highway Capacity Manual were developed
specifically for each roadway subject to MMLOS in the City of Carlsbad. The specific capacity calculated
for each roadway takes into account key geometric and operational factors including number of lanes,
type of facility, intersection cycle length, distance between intersections, and other factors related to lane
capacity and signal operations. The capacity for each roadway segment was calculated using the ARTPLAN
software, which was developed using the capacity calculations outlined in the HCM. The ARTPLAN
software package is used nationally as a planning tool, but alternative methods can be used to calculate
roadway segment capacity.
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 23 | Page
The City of Carlsbad Roadway Capacity Tables provide the directional capacity for each roadway segment
subject to MMLOS analysis in the General Plan Mobility Element. To evaluate the operating conditions
along a study corridor, peak hour volumes should be compared to the Roadway Capacity Tables to
determine the segment operating conditions. The LOS for each segment shall be reported for all study
scenarios in the TIA. Roadway Capacity Tables shall be provided by the City Engineer / City Traffic Engineer
at the time of project initiation when the Scoping Agreement is approved.
7.5 State Owned Facility Level of Service (Freeways, Interchanges, Ramps, Ramp Meters)
Analysis of State Owned facilities will be conducted in compliance with District 11 Transportation Impact
Analysis requirements. At the time the Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines was published, the Guide for
the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (December 2002) was the guiding documents for State Owned
facilities in San Diego County and it called for applying the following methodologies:
• Freeway Segments – Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), operational analysis
• Weaving Areas – Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM)
• Ramps and Ramp Junctions – HCM, operational analysis or Caltrans HDM, Caltrans Ramp Metering
Guidelines (most recent edition)
7.6 Pedestrians, Bicycles and Transit Level of Service Analysis
The City’s MMLOS methodology provides a qualitative “grade” assigned to travel modes, ranging from a
level of service (LOS) A to LOS F. LOS A reflects a high service standard for a travel mode (e.g. outstanding
characteristics and experience for that mode) and LOS F would reflect a poor service standard for a travel
mode (e.g. congestion for vehicles, inadequate bicycle, pedestrian, or transit facilities, etc.). The City’s
General Plan established a standard of LOS D or better only for the travel mode(s) subject to the MMLOS
standard for the designated roadway typology as identified in the table below consistent with Mobility
Element Table 3-1.
In 2016, the City developed a method for evaluating MMLOS. Each non-auto travel mode (pedestrian,
bicycle, and transit) receives its own LOS score and corresponding letter grade as shown in Table 5. The
City strives to maintain LOS D or better on each roadway for each mode of travel that is subject to this
standard.
As part of the City’s Mobility Element, streets were classified into typologies as illustrated previously in
Figure 1 consistent with Table 3-1 of the Mobility Element. As stated in the Mobility Element, the typology
of the roadway section determines witch modes of travel are subjected to the LOS D standard. The intent
is to provide a balanced mobility system that emphasizes primary users as opposed to always providing
ideal level of service for all modes on every facility.
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 24 | Page
Table 5: MMLOS Level of Service Thresholds
Point Score LOS
90-100 A
80-89 B
70-79 C
60-69 D
50-59 E
0-49 F
Source: City of Carlsbad, MMLOS Worksheet
Street typologies are provided on the following pages.
The City has developed a detailed MMLOS Tool to aid in MMLOS analysis methodology. The City Engineer/
City Traffic Engineer shall provide the most current version of the electronic tool at the time the Scoping
Agreement is approved. The following is a brief description of the MMLOS methodology and criteria
outlined in the City’s MMLOS Tool:
Pedestrian MMLOS for pedestrian priority streets, the MMLOS criteria evaluates the quality of the
pedestrian system (e.g. number of vehicle lanes that need to be crossed and the speed of adjacent traffic)
and the friendliness of the infrastructure at intersections (e.g. pedestrian countdown heads, dedicated
pedestrian phases [e.g. a scramble phase], curb extensions, refuge median). In addition, the connectivity
and contiguity of the pedestrian system along street sections (particularly ADA-compliant
connectivity/contiguity) is a critical component of pedestrian priority streets.
Bicycle MMLOS for bicycle priority streets, the MMLOS criteria evaluates the quality of the bicycle system
(e.g. bicycle route, bicycle lanes, or bicycle pathway; presence of bicycle buffers from the vehicle travel
way), the amenities of the system (e.g. presence of bicycle parking), and the friendliness of the
infrastructure (e.g. bicycle detection at intersections, pavement conditions, presence of vehicle parking).
In addition, the connectivity and contiguity of the bicycle system along street sections is a critical
component of pedestrian priority streets.
Transit MMLOS for transit priority streets, the MMLOS criteria evaluates the transit vehicle right-of-way
(e.g. dedicated or shared, signal priority), hours and frequency of service (e.g. weekday/weekend hours,
peak period highway); performance (e.g. on-time or late); amenities and safety (e.g. lighting, covered stop,
bench, on-board bike/surfboard storage); and connectivity (e.g. to other transit routes, employment
areas, schools, visitor attractions, and other major destinations).
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 25 | Page
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
STREET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATED MODES
ACCOMMODATED SUBJECT STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED ATTRIBUTES
MODES TOMMLOS
STANDARD (YIN)
Freeways
Iii. y • High-speed facilities designed to accommodate vehicles and buses moving through the
city and region
~ y • Bicycles and pedestrians are prohibited
Arterlal Streets
y • These are the primary vehicle routes through the city for both local and regional vehicle
trips.
• Designed to safely move all modes of travel while efficiently moving vehicles and buses
throughout the city.
·-,. • Traffic signals shall be coordinated to optimiz.e vehicle movements
• Bicycle lanes shall be provided and can be further enhanced or complemented by other
facilities or off.-street pathways
• Pedestrian facilities to be provided consistent with ADA requirements
• Mid-block crossings should not be provided . • On-street parking should be prohibited along these corridors
• Vertical traffic calming techniques (such as speed tables, humps, etc.) should not be
considered
~ -y • Special considerations can be considered on arterials within proximity to schools to
enhance Safe Routes to Schools for pedestrians and bicyclists.
-
Identity Streets
,ii-,. • These streets provide the primary access to and from the heart of the city -the Village
• Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians
and bicyclists
• Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle movement
• No pedestrian shall cross more than five vehicular travel and/or turn lanes
• In addition to ADA compliant ramps and sidewalks, sidewalks should support the adja-
cent land uses as follows:
~ y -Adjacent to retail uses, modified/new sidewalks should generally be a minimum of
10 feet {12 feet preferred) in width where feasible and taking into consideration the
traffic volumes of the adjacent roadway, and allow for the land use to utilize the
sidewalk with outdoor seating and other activities
-Adjacent to residential uses, modified/new sidewalks should be a minimum of six
feet in width
'Elsewhere, modified/new sldewalks should be a minimum of eight feet In width
y • Where feasible, bicycle lanes should be provided
• Vehicle speeds should complement the adjacent land uses
• Bicycle parking should be provided in retail areas
• Bike racks should be readily provided within the public right-of-way and encouraged on
private property
• Traffic calming devices, such as curb extensions (bulbouts) or enhanced pedestrian
crossings should be considered and evaluated for implementation
~ • Street furniture shall be oriented toward the businesses
• Mid-block pedestrian crossings could be provided at appropriate locations (e.g. where
sight distance is adequate and speeds are appropriate)
• On-street vehicle parking should be provided. In areas with high parking demand, in-
novative parking management techniques should be implemented/ considered
• Pedestrians should typically be •buffered• from vehicle traffic using landscaping or
parked vehicles
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 26 | Page
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
SJREETTVPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATED MODES
ACCOMMODATED
MODES
SUBJECT SlREEt lYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED ATTRIBUTES
TO MMLOS
STANDARD (YIN)
VIiiage Streets
N
l'
• Primary purpose is to move people throughout the Village; providing access to busi-
nesses, residences, transit and recreation within the Village area.
• Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians
and bicyclists.
• Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle movement
• Promote pedestrian and bicycle connectivity through short block lengths
1---------+-------i • Bicycle lanes should be provided A • Bicycle boulevards can be considered
N
Arterial Connector Streets
y
• Pedestrians should be accommodated on sidewalks adjacent to the travel way (mini-
mum 5' wide sidewalk)
• Mid-block pedestrian crossings and traffic calming devices should be considered, but
only at locations with high pedestrian activity levels or major destinations/attractions
• On-street parking may be provided
• Primary purpose is to connect people to different areas and land uses of the city by con-
necting to/from arterial streets
1---------+---------1 • Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians
't and bicyclists and efficiently moving vehicles between arterial streets.
t---------+--------< y
N
Neighborhood Connedor Street
N
• Bicycle lanes should be provided
• Pedestrians should be accommodated on sidewalks adjacent to the travel way (mini-
mum 5' wide sidewalk)
• Mid-block pedestrian crossings and traffic calming devices should be considered, but
only at locations with high pedestrian activity levels or major destinations/attractions
• On-street parking may be provided
• Primary purpose is to connect people to different neighborhoods and land uses of the
city
• Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians
1---------+---------1 and bicyclists.
t---------+--------<
V
N
• Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle movement
• Bicycle lanes should be provided
• Bicycle boulevards can be considered
• Pedntrians should be accommodated on sidewalks adjacent to the travel way (mini-
mum 5' wide sidewalk)
• Mid-block pedestrian crossings and traffic calming devices should be considered, but
only at locations with high pedestrian activity levels or major destinations/attractions
• On-street parking may be provided
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 27 | Page
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
SrREET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATED MODES
ACCOMMODATED SUBJEO STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED ATTRIBUTES
MODES TO MMLOS
STANDARD (Y/N)
Employment/Transit Connector Streets
N • Primary purpose is to connect people to and from the employment areas of the city, as
well as important destinations and major transit facilities.
• Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians ., and bicyclists and efficiently moving buses to employment, transit stations and major
destinations.
• Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle movement
V • Direct connections to bus stops should be provided
• Enhanced bus stops should be considered that include shelters, benches, and lighting
~ y • Bicycle lanes and sidewalks should be provided
• Pedestrian crossing distances should be minimized
• On-street paric:ing may be provided
coastal Streets
N • Primary purpose is to move people along the city's ocean waterfront and connect
people to the beach, recreation, businesses and residences in close proximity to the
waterfront. The street serves as a destination for people who seek to drive, walk and
bicycle along the ocean waterfront.
• Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians
and bicyclists. y • Vehicle speeds shall be managed to support uses along the coast . Enhanced bicycle and pedestrian crossings should be provided, including:
-High visibility crosswalks
-Enhanced pedestrian notifications (e.g. responsive push-button devices)
y -Enhanced bicycle detection
-Bicycle lanes shall be provided and can be further enhanced or complemented by
other facilities {such as bicycle lane buffers or off-street pathways)
• Pedestrian facilities should be a minimum of five feet and shall strive for six to eight
feet in width and shall conform to ADA requirements ---N • Pedestrian crossing distances should be minimized
• Trail facilities should be encouraged
• Opportunities for mid-block pedestrian crossings should be investigated
• On-street pa ricing should be provided
• Transit facility and operation improvements should be encouraged
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 28 | Page
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
STREET TYPOLOGY AND ACCOMMODATED MODES
ACCOMMODATED SUBJECT STREET TYPOLOGY DESCRIPTION AND PREFERRED ATTRIBUTES
MODES TOMMLOS
STANDARD (YIN)
School Streets
N • Primary purpose is to connect people to schools from nearby residential neighbor-
hoods.
• Designed to safely move all modes of travel with an emphasis on providing safe pedes-
trian and bicycle access for students traveling to and from nearby schools.
" y • Vehicle speeds shall be managed to support school uses (typically 25 MPH)
• Enhanced bicycle and pedestrian crmsings should be provided, including:
-High visibility crosswalks
-Enhanced pedestrian notifications (e.g. responsive push-button devices)
t y -Enhanced bicycle detection
-Bicycle lanes shall be provided and can be further enhemced or complemented by
other facilities or off-street pathways
• Pedestrian facilities should be a minimum of six feet and shall strive for eight feet in
~ N width and shall conform to ADA requirements
• Pedestrian crossing distances should be minimized
• Opportunities fer mid-block pedestrian crossings should be investigated
• Traffic calming devices that improve service levels and safety for pedestrians and bicy-
clists should be considered
Industrial Streets
V • Primary purpose is to connect people to businesses within the city's industrial parks. . Designed to safely move all modes of travel while efficiently moving vehicles and buses
t.l from arterial streets and employment/transit connector streets to busineues.
• Traffic calming devices are generally discouraged given the propensity fer larger trucks
and heavy vehicles in this area
N • On-street parking may be provided as long as it does not interfere with the turning
(, . radii of heavy vehicles.
---
~ V
Local/Neighborhood Street
N • Primary purpose is to connect people to and through residential neighborhoods and
local areas af the city.
• Designed to safely move all modes of travel while enhancing mobility for pedestrians
and bicyclists.
V • Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle movement
• Pedestrians should be ac.commodated on a sidewalk or soft surface trall (such as de-
composed granite) unless those facllltles are Inconsistent with the existing desirable
V neighborhood character
• Bicycles can be accommodated with a bicycle lane or route if vehicle volumes and/or-
speeds necessitate; otherwise bicycles can share the street
• Blcycle boulevards can be considered -N • Traffic calming measures should be considered when supported by the neighborhood
or when warranted for safety reasons
• On-street parking should be considered
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 29 | Page
SIGNIFICANCE OF AUTO IMPACTS TO CONSIDER MITIGATION
8.1 Thresholds of Significance
The City of Carlsbad Growth Management Program “Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan (last
amended August 22, 2017)” states that the performance standard for the circulation system is as follows:
Implement a comprehensive livable streets network that serves all users of the system – vehicles,
pedestrians, bicycles and public transit. Maintain LOS D or better for all modes that are subject to this multi-
modal level of service (MMLOS) standard, as identified in Table 3-1 of the General Plan Mobility Element,
excluding LOS exempt intersections and streets approved by the City Council.
Section 21.90.080 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code (Growth Management) states that:
If at any time after preparation of the local facilities management plan the performance standards
established by a plan are not met then no development permits or building permits shall be issued within
the local zone until the performance standard is met or arrangements satisfactory to the City Council
guaranteeing the facilities and improvement have been made.
To comply with the Growth Management Program, all roadway facilities identified as not meeting the
performance standard (LOS D) in the existing conditions scenario (see Section 4) must be fully mitigated
regardless of the project impact to that facility, or the TIA must request an exemption from the LOS D
standard according to the Mobility Element Implementing Policy 3-P.9:
Develop and maintain a list of street facilities where specific modes of travel are exempt from the LOS
standard (LOS exempt street facilities), as approved by the City Council. For LOS exempt street facilities, the
city will not implement improvements to maintain the LOS standard outlines in Policy 3-P.4 if such
improvements are beyond what is identified as appropriate at build out of the General Plan. In the case of
street facilities where the vehicle mode of travel is exempt from the LOS standard, other non-vehicle
capacity-building improvements will be required to improve mobility through implementation of
transportation demand and transportation system management measures as outlined in Policy 3-P.11, to
the extent feasible, and/or to implement the livable streets goals and policies of this Mobility Element.
Evaluate the list of exempt street facilities, as part of the Growth Management monitoring program, to
determine if such exemptions are still warranted.
To exempt the vehicle mode of travel from the LOS standard at a particular street intersection or segment,
the intersection or street segment must be identified as built-out by the City Council because:
--;~---------------------------{cityof California s. Carlsbad
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 30 | Page
a. Acquiring the rights of way is not feasible; or
b. The proposed improvements would significantly impact the environment in an
unacceptable way and mitigation would not contribute to the nine core values of the
Carlsbad Community Vision; or
c. The proposed improvements would result in unacceptable impacts to other community
values or General Plan policies; or
d. The proposed improvements would require more than three through travel lanes in each
direction.
The project causes a significant impact to the transportation facility in the study area if one or more of
the following criteria is met:
• The roadway facility is projected to exceed the LOS D standard (see Section 7.4) and the project’s traffic
meets or exceeds the thresholds of significance listed in Table 6; or
• A ramp meter delay exceeds 15 minutes (see Section 7.5) and the project’s traffic meets or exceeds the
thresholds of significance listed in Table 6; or
• The addition of project results in a change in LOS from acceptable (LOS D or better) to deficient (LOS E or F)
on a roadway segment, freeway segment or ramp; or
• The project results in a change in conditions on a roadway segment, freeway segment or ramp that exceeds
the allowable thresholds (outlined in Table 6) for locations operating at a deficient LOS without the project
(baseline conditions).
Table 6: Measure of Significant Project Traffic Impacts Roadways Subject to the Vehicle MMLOS
Standard
The project can have either a direct or cumulative impact as follows:
• Direct Impacts: any significant impact identified under existing conditions. Direct impacts shall be fully
mitigated by the project.
• Cumulative Impacts: any significant impact identified under Cumulative and Horizon Year conditions.
Cumulative impacts may be mitigated through fair share contribution. Projects identified for fair share
contribution should be included in the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or Transportation Impact
Fee (TIF) program.
Auto Facility Subject
to MMLOS Thresholds Threshold of Significance
Roadway Segment
Any trip added to a segment forecast to operate at deficient LOS requires project
mitigation; Project mitigation will be determined based on project contribution to the
identified impact.
Freeway Segment 1% increase in V/C or 1 mph decrease in speed
Ramp Meter 2-minute increase
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 31 | Page
Any roadway section that is identified as having a significant impact must either:
• Mitigate the traffic impact to pre-project conditions, or
• Request LOS exemption from City Council for the LOS standard and identify feasible TSM & TDM mitigation
8.2 Mitigation
The TIA report shall identify mitigation measures for all identified significant impacts. The TIA must
demonstrate that the mitigation measures project that the roadway facilities in the study area will meet
the applicable auto LOS standard under all scenarios studied (see Table 1 and Section 4).
The project can request the roadway facility to be exempt if the request complies with Mobility Element
Implementing Policy 3-P.9. Exemptions are considered and approved by City Council. Should the
exemption be granted by City Council, mitigation will include appropriate Travel Demand Management
(TDM) and Transportation System Management (TSM) measures. Examples of TDM measures will be
provided by the City Engineer / City Traffic Engineer at the time the Scoping Agreement is approved.
If the project adds traffic to a facility that has been previously classified as exempt from the auto LOS
standard, project mitigation will include appropriate Travel Demand Management (TDM) and Traffic
System Management (TSM) measures. Examples of TDM measures will be provided by the City Engineer
/ City Traffic Engineer at the time the Scoping Agreement is approved.
8.3 State Owned Facility Mitigation
In addition, the City of Carlsbad Mobility Element requires
future development projects, which are determined during
site-specific environmental review to have a significant
impact on freeway facilities (I-5 and SR-78), to participate
in a freeway traffic mitigation program that has been
approved by the city that will avoid, reduce or offset the
increase in freeway traffic directly attributable to the
proposed project or the impact will be considered
significant and unavoidable. The mitigation program may
include, but is not limited to, payment of a fair share fee to
Caltrans for necessary improvements to affected freeway
facilities or to NCTD or such other transit agency for
improvement of public transit on affected freeways, or
such other activities as will avoid, reduce or offset the
project’s significant impacts on freeway facilities.
8.4 Transportation Demand Management & Transportation System Management
Not all mitigation measures must directly improve the facility directly impacted by the project (e.g., add a
new lane to increase roadway capacity). Technology improvements that expand the transportation
system capacity may also be considered as project mitigation. For example, the installation of adaptive
signals that can be controlled from the City’s Transportation Management Center (TMC) may be a feasible
mitigation along one of the City’s identified adaptive signal control corridors. Payment toward a TSM
project may be considered feasible mitigation.
Note: It is the responsibility of Caltrans,
on Caltrans initiated projects, to mitigate the
effect of ramp metering, for initial as well as
future operational impacts, on local streets
that intersect and feed entrance ramps to
the freeway. Developers and/or local
agencies, however, should be required to
mitigate any impact to existing ramp meter
facilities, future ramp meter installations, or
local streets, when those impacts are
attributable to new development and/or
local agency roadway improvement projects.
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 32 | Page
Other mitigation measures may include financial participation in Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) strategies. Examples of these TDM projects include transit facilities, bike facilities, walkability,
telecommuting, traffic rideshare programs, flex-time, carpool incentives, parking cash-out. Additional
mitigation measure may become acceptable as future technologies and policies evolve.
8.5 Signalized and Unsignalized Intersection Operational Improvements
Operational improvements may be necessary at signalized and unsignalized intersections that have been
identified as exceeding the operational standards outlined in Sections 7.1 and 7.2. The following will be
used to determine the need for operational improvements at intersections included in the study area:
Signalized Intersections: The project will identify specific operational issues (e.g., queues projected to exceed
storage capacity). Working with the City Traffic Engineer / City Engineer improvements will be identified to
address the operational issues.
Unsignalized Intersections: The project will identify if signal warrants are met for all project scenarios evaluated.
Based on the findings of the warrant analysis and the timing of the warrants met, the City Engineer/City Traffic
Engineer will determine if a traffic signal is needed and the project responsibility for contributing or constructing
the traffic signal.
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 33 | Page
SIGNIFICANCE OF PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND TRANSIT SYSTEM IMPACTS TO CONSIDER
MITIGATION
This section presents the methodology to identify project-related impacts to pedestrian, bicycle and
transit systems that would require mitigation measures. The following criteria are used to identify
pedestrian, bicycle and transit system impacts in the defined study area:
• Pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities within the study area (as defined in Section 3) where the existing
condition is LOS E or F; or
• Identification of any “gaps” in the pedestrian and bicycle networks
Potential mitigation measures could include constructing or a fair share contribution toward the financing
of feasible capital improvement projects related to pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. Where
applicable a project could contribute a fee toward local or citywide transit capital improvements, or
participate in TDM measures that support transit operations.
Because of the qualitative nature of the MMLOS methodology, a project impact is significant if an existing
pedestrian, bicycle or transit facility is determined to not meet the LOS D standard regardless of the
forecasted number of project trips expected to use the facility. An impact occurs and is deemed significant
if:
• an existing facility in the project study area does not meet the pedestrian, bicycle or transit LOS standard,
or
• the project causes a standard facility to become substandard (e.g., removal of an existing bike lane or bus
stop, or blocking pedestrian access), or
• a gap is identified in or directly adjacent to the study area related to pedestrian, bicycle or transit service
to the project site.
--;~---------------------------{cityof California 9. Carlsbad
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 34 | Page
APPENDIX A
SCOPING AGREEMENT
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 35 | Page
{city of ____________________________ Carlsbad
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPING AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY
This letter acknowledges the City of Carlsbad Traffic Engineering Division requirements for the transportation
impact analysis of the following project. The analysis must follow the latest City of Carlsbad Transportaion
Impact Study Guidelines dated September 2017.
Case No.
Project Name:
Project Location:
Project Description: ________________________________ _
Related Cases -
SP No.
EIR No.
GPA No.
CZ No.
Name:
Address:
Consultant
Telephone: ______________ _
Developer
A. Trip Generation Source: ____________________________ _
Extended Land Use
Extended Zoning
Total Daily Trips
Proposed Land Use ____________ _
Proposed Zoning
Forcast Daily Trips ____________ _
(Attach a trip generation table. Describe Trip Reduction Factors proposed and included in the trip generation table.)
B. Trip Distribution: D Select Zone (Model Series __ )
(Provide exhibit for detailed trip distribution and assignment.)
C. Background Traffic
Phased Project D No D Yes Phases:
Please contact the Engineering Devision or use the most recently provided data
Model/Forcast Methodology: ____________________________ _
California
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES
April 2018 36 | Page
{city of __________________________ Carlsbad
D. Study Intersections: {NOTE: Subject to revision after other projects, trip generation and distribution are
determined, or comments)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
-------------------
-------------------
-------------------
E. Study Roadway Segments: (NOTE: Subject to revision after other projects, t rip generation and
distribution are determined, or comments)
1.
2.
3.
4.
F. Other Jurisdictional Impacts
5. -------------------
6. -------------------
7. -------------------
8. -------------------
Is this project within any other Agency's Sphere of Influence or one-mile radius of boundaries? D Yes O No
If so, name of Jurisdiction: -------------------------------
G. Site Plan (Attach a legible 11'X17' copy)
H. Specific issues to be adressed in the Study (in addition to the standard analysis described in the
Guidelines) (To be filled out by Engineering Devision)
Recommended by:
· Consultant's Representative Date
Scoping Agreement Submitted on
Date
Scoping Agreement Resubmitted on
Date
Approved Scoping Agreement:
City of Carlsbad Date
Traffic Engineering Division
California
1
October 16, 2020
Re: Marja Acres project (Letter 1 of 2): Development application review problems
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers (Cc: Planning Commission):
I am not opposed to the Marja Acres project, but there have been major issues during the application
review process that I want to highlight in this letter. Carlsbad’s Growth Management Plan (GMP),
General Plan, and Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines, in conjunction with sound
professional engineering judgement, are supposed to provide a logical process to generate accurate
data that ensures developers pay their fair shares for the impacts of their projects in a manner that is
transparent to the public.
However, I believe many of the review actions described below are inconsistent with the spirit and letter
of the governing documents and/or demonstrate poor engineering judgement and poor public policy.
This could frustrate Carlsbad residents and burden taxpayers when traffic worsens due to insufficient
proactive mitigation.
And I feel this is a general problem with the review process that needs to be addressed for the sake of
other current and future development applications. I also think it would be useful to have an audit
conducted on the review process to assess its fairness and compliance with the governing rules, and to
identify improvements that can be made.
I want to note that much of the information below is based on communications between staff, the
developer, the developer’s traffic consultant, and others, which I obtained through a public records
request. In a second letter, I plan to describe some specific issues with the current Marja Acres
environmental impact report (EIR) and associated documentation that I think should be addressed
before approving that specific project.
SUMMARY
• Although the TIA Guidelines were published in April 2018 in response to a settlement
agreement, staff told the developer on multiple occasions during the process that
implementation of the guidelines was being delayed pending modifications.
• Despite the complexity of the Marja Acres traffic studies, and despite the fact that several
different studies were conducted between April 2018 and present, no TIA Scoping Agreement
was ever executed, as required by the TIA Guidelines. Such agreements provide transparency
and accountability by establishing upfront the methods to be used, but they are seemingly
never executed for any projects.
• Staff has made many different (often self-contradictory) interpretations of whether and how the
TIA Guidelines should be applied, depending on convenience and/or benefit. In some cases, they
2
have claimed they do not have to follow them at all. In another case, they have claimed that
they have to follow at least one provision to the letter. In many cases, there are creative
interpretations that do not seem to match the original intent.
• Staff shared with the developer that the TIA Guidelines, or selected provisions therein, do not
have to be followed, because they have never been brought to the City Council for approval.
• The traffic study in the original 4/15/2019 draft environmental impact report (DEIR) contained a
fatal flaw that masked the fact that the project would cause a level of service (LOS) failure on El
Camino Real, which I pointed out in comments.
• Rather than addressing the LOS problem, staff and the developer collected, and planned to
include in a revised EIR, new “supplemental” traffic counts collected in 6/2019 on El Camino
Real that were lower than the last two counts (11/2018 and 5/2019), in order to demonstrate
no impact under the GMP. In addition, in violation of the General Plan and TIA Guidelines, they
planned a switch to using the flawed old Carlsbad segment vehicle LOS method that produces all
“A” grades to demonstrate no impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
• A subsequent set of traffic counts collected in 9/2019 showed deficiencies on El Camino Real,
squashing these plans. Again, rather than addressing the LOS problem, they then switched to an
entirely new approach—vehicle miles traveled (VMT)—that allowed them to avoid LOS under
CEQA altogether. This, even though VMT methods had not been developed, and the application
was deemed complete long before the VMT rule change would go into effect.
• Staff provided early access to draft VMT methods as they were being developed, and a
recirculated DEIR with VMT analysis was completed and distributed for public review on
6/5/2020—well before the VMT Analysis Guidelines were finalized or the VMT switchover
became effective on 7/1/2020.
• In spite of the switch to VMT for CEQA purposes, the GMP still requires LOS analysis for vehicles
and transit in the project area as part of a local mobility analysis (LMA). However, for the transit
portion of the LMA, the only mitigation is a bench and trash can at one bus stop—and a bike
rack and repair area in the project.
• And for the vehicle portion of the LMA, there were new shenanigans. The LMA was withheld
until about 24 hours before the Planning Commission hearing, and there was a last-minute
manipulation of the trip generation portion, which artificially reduced the projected net new
traffic of the development from over 2,300 average daily trips (ADT) to just 901 ADT. That is a
ridiculously low number that could cost the city around $100,000 in lost traffic impact fees.
• The ADT reduction arose from a change in the way existing traffic was subtracted from the total
generated by the proeject. The 2,300+ ADT number was based on subtracting actual traffic
going to the existing businesses as determined by traffic counts at the driveways, while the 901
ADT number was based on subtracting artificial traffic calculated with an estimator tool.
• Staff made the trip generation method change despite emails that challenged it, pointing out
that the “existing [businesses] are old and underperforming,” that the driveway counts were
very recent, and that using the driveway count data “is a better approach.”
• Staff then falsely claimed to the Planning Commission that they were required to make the trip
generation method change based on the TIA Guidelines.
3
DETAILS
April 2018 TIA Guidelines and failure to execute TIA Scoping Agreements
On March 14, 2017, the City of Carlsbad executed a settlement agreement with an environmental group
that required—within one year—an update of Carlsbad’s TIA Guidelines to bring them into compliance
with the level of service (LOS) and transportation demand management (TDM) provisions in the 2015
General Plan Update.1 In April 2018, the TIA Guidelines update was published in satisfaction of that
agreement.2
On December 24, 2018, the application for the proposed Marja Acres project was deemed complete,
and on April 15, 2019, a draft environmental impact report (DEIR) with a traffic study was distributed for
public review.3 The TIA Guidelines require that TIA Scoping Agreements be executed between the city
and developers for such traffic studies, which define the methods and requirements of the study.4
However, no TIA Scoping Agreement had been executed. Later in 2019, there was a major shift in the
traffic study approach to a completely different set of methods, but, again no TIA Scoping Agreement
was executed, despite the complexity of this project.
I have requested the TIA Scoping Agreements for several other larger, ongoing development projects in
Carlsbad, but no responsive documents have been provided, indicating that staff does not do them. In
addition to being a violation of the TIA Guidelines, that approach is ripe for shenanigans and is poor
public policy. The troubling, years-long progression of the traffic studies done for the Marja Acres
project is an unfortunate example of this broken system, as I will now detail.
Selective enforcement of TIA Guidelines and associated rules and methods
Despite the fact that the new rules/guidelines should have been developed and in effect concurrent
with adoption of the General Plan Update in 2015, and despite the fact that the city spent a year
updating the TIA Guidelines after the settlement agreement was executed, city staff informed the Marja
Acres developer (the applicant) on multiple occasions through at least September 2018 that
implementation of the TIA Guidelines was being further delayed pending more modifications.5
For the Marja Acres application (and others), staff has had many different (often self-contradictory)
interpretations of whether and how the TIA Guidelines should be applied, depending on the context. For
1 Carlsbad City Council Resolution No. 2017-044 (North County Advocates Settlement Agreement, 3/14/2017):
http://edocs.carlsbadca.gov/HPRMWebDrawer/RecordHTML/467762 2 Carlsbad TIA Guidelines (April 2018):
https://cityadmin.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=22758 3 State of California Clearinghouse CEQAnet Web Portal entry for the original (April 2019) Marja Acres DEIR:
https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2018041022/2 4 One of the main objectives of the TIA Guidelines is to create a framework for creation of Scoping Agreements. In
particular, see Section 3 and the Scoping Agreement template in the appendix. 5 E.g., 6/21/2018 and 9/24/2018 emails between city staff, the developer, and their traffic consultant.
4
example, when I have asked about the lack of execution of formal TIA Scoping Agreements, staff has
cited a section of the TIA guidelines that describes the use of phone calls and emails as a substitute,6 but
those are only a substitute for an in-person meeting to guide the creation of a TIA Scoping Agreement—
not a substitute for the agreement itself.
Then, in their response to my public comment on the Marja Acres DEIR, staff argued that the TIA
Guidelines did not have to be followed at all, because they were not in effect when the project TIA was
submitted.7 It should be noted here that the TIA Guidelines went into effect in April 2018, the traffic
counts included in the first published Marja Acres TIA (April 15, 2019 DEIR) were not collected until
November 2018, and the entire TIA approach was completely revised again in late 2019, so this is a
ridiculous argument.
Staff also shared with the Marja Acres developer that it can be argued that the TIA Guidelines, or
selected provisions of the guidelines do not have to be followed, because the City Council has never
formally approved them.8 I have heard this “theory” elsewhere, as well. It should be noted, ironically,
that staff has chosen never to bring the guidelines to council for approval, likely to allow them to
selectively enforce them and make changes at will. Hopefully, that will change with the recent priority to
have the Traffic and Mobility Commission (T&MC) conduct an external review and have council approve
them.
And now, in complete contradiction to the above arguments, staff is arguing that they have to follow the
TIA Guidelines—at least for one alleged provision that allows them to artificially make a huge reduction
in the amount of traffic generated by the Marja Acres project. This is also a flawed argument, as detailed
below, but this all demonstrates the extreme inconsistency and bias in the process.9
Meanwhile, staff has been tinkering for several years with other methods and tools, such as the
multimodal level of service (MMLOS) tools, which are supposed to define the service requirements for
pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of travel. The clear intent of the tinkering is not to improve
conditions for those modes of travel, but rather to avoid having to report performance failures by the
city or developers. Transportation Department staff recently committed to having the T&MC participate
in a review of the MMLOS tools, and hopefully a better strategy can be agreed upon going forward.
Fatally flawed traffic study in the original April 15, 2019 Marja Acres DEIR
The Marja Acres project is adjacent to a portion of El Camino on which vehicle traffic is much heavier in
one direction, depending on the time of day (nearly an 80%/20% split). And, due to the center median,
all traffic going in and out of the project must occur in the southbound (actually eastbound in that
6 E.g., 7/10/2020 email from staff to me 7 See the response to comment IND-R1.12 in the Marja Acres final EIR 8 E.g., see the draft of the applicant’s traffic consultant’s responses to my public comments in an 8/5/2019 email to
staff 9 Staff testimony at the 9/16/2020 Planning Commission public hearing on Marja Acres
5
specific area) direction. To accurately reflect congestion, the TIA Guidelines require separate assessment
of traffic in each direction.
In November 2018, consistent with the TIA Guidelines, the applicant’s traffic consultant collected
separate traffic counts in each direction on El Camino Real between Tamarack Avenue and Cannon
Road. However, when they prepared their TIA, they effectively combined the traffic volumes in both
directions and assumed a ~50%/50% split (bidirectional assessment), leading to the incorrect conclusion
that the project would not have a significant impact on congestion.10
In a pair of May 2019 public comments on the DEIR, I detailed this fatal flaw in the traffic study and
provided evidence that the project actually would cause southbound El Camino Real to become
deficient under the Growth Management Plan (GMP) by causing it to transition from LOS D to E/F.11
In emails I obtained recently through a public records request, I discovered that there was an
acknowledgment at the time that the bidirectional assessment method was, indeed, flawed.12 A draft
response to my comment from the applicant’s traffic consultant dated August 5, 2019 included the
following statement:
…[T]he TIA erroneously used the City’s published ‘bidirectional capacity’ from Table 2 of the
Roadway Capacity Tables Report (Capacity Report), instead of the ‘directional capacity’ from
Table 1 of that same report.13
This TIA was produced by professional traffic engineers contracted by the applicant and was presumably
reviewed by city traffic engineering staff, but it was included in the DEIR despite the fatal flaw. I was not
sure whether this was a purposeful mistake to avoid having to show a significant traffic impact, or just a
serious error. Based on the email exchanges I have now seen, I will give the benefit of the doubt and
conclude it was just an error.
That said, the above acknowledgment of the error was never made public, and the series of events it
triggered (described below) are very troubling—with no more benefit of the doubt to be provided.
Plan to change the conclusions of the traffic study with questionable new traffic counts
Instead of having the applicant acknowledge that its project would cause El Camino Real to become
deficient, staff worked with the applicant to collect new traffic counts to replace the counts that
10 April 15, 2019 Marja Acres DEIR 11 Available as letters IND-21 and IND-49 in the final EIR:
https://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=45676 12 E.g., 5/28/2019 and 5/29/2019 emails from city staff to the applicant’s traffic consultant 13 Marja Acres Draft Responses to Comments on March 26, 2019 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), LLG,
Engineers, August 5, 2019
6
resulted in the deficiency.14 They collected what they called “supplemental” traffic counts on El Camino
Real between Tamarack Avenue and Cannon Road in June 2019, which were lower than the ones they
had originally collected in November 2018, and they were low enough that they could suggest the
project would not cause the deficiency on southbound El Camino Real.
Staff directed the applicant’s traffic consultant to use the new traffic counts and call the November 2018
counts an “anomaly.” They also devised a new scheme (not described in the TIA Guidelines) to average
various combinations of multiple counts along the El Camino Real corridor.15 Staff’s directives were
reinforced through multiple rounds of editing and staff review of draft responses to my comments
throughout July and August of 2019, with the intent of incorporating the new data into a revised EIR.16
Notably, though, the city had collected other traffic counts in that area of El Camino Real in May 2019—
just a month before the June 2019 “supplemental” counts—as part of the annual traffic monitoring
program. Those May 2019 counts were even higher than the November 2018 counts, but those were
not taken into consideration or planned for inclusion in the revised EIR. Eventually, additional counts
done in September 2019 were similarly high to the November 2018 and May 2019 counts,
demonstrating that the June 2019 “supplemental” counts were the “anomaly.”
The whole strategy of doing “supplemental” traffic counts and cherry-picking the lowest ones with some
sort of averaging scheme to get a desired result is very troubling. It represents poor engineering
judgement and poor public policy.
Plan to use the misleading old Carlsbad street segment LOS methods for CEQA purposes
It is equally troubling that staff emails also reveal that, after the fatal flaw was demonstrated in the DEIR
traffic study, they also directed the applicant to change to the old invalid Carlsbad street segment LOS
method to assess the traffic impacts of the project for CEQA purposes.17
As I have described previously, staff concocted and used the old invalid vehicle LOS method from 1989
through about 2018. It vastly under-reported congestion, returning LOS “A” grades for virtually every
street facility in Carlsbad, no matter how congested they were. True to form, in the draft data tables
produced in the July/August 2019 timeframe for Marja Acres, the use of that method resulted in every
street facility passing with LOS “A” grades, even though the valid methods were returning LOS “D” and
“F” grades for the same facilities using the same traffic counts.
14 E.g., 6/12/2019 email from the applicant to city staff and the applicant’s traffic consultant 15 Marja Acres Draft Responses to Comments on March 26, 2019 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), LLG,
Engineers, August 5, 2019 16 E.g., 8/15/2019, 8/19/2019, 8/20/2019, 8/21/2019, 8/22/2019 emails between city staff, the applicant, and the
applicant’s traffic consultant, including attached drafts of responses to my comments and guidance from staff 17 Marja Acres Draft Responses to Comments on March 26, 2019 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), LLG,
Engineers, August 5, 2019
7
The use of the old Carlsbad method was supposed to end with the 2015 General Plan Update, which
requires use of a valid method based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Also, the TIA Guidelines
clearly state that the HCM-based methods described therein are to be used for CEQA analyses.18 Despite
that, staff’s directive was reinforced through multiple rounds of editing and staff review of draft data
tables and draft responses to my comments throughout July and August of 2019, with the intent of
incorporating the results into a revised EIR.19The attempted resurrection of the flawed old Carlsbad
method for the Marja Acres project represents poor engineering judgement and poor public policy.
New September 2019 traffic counts
On September 16-20, 2019, the city collected yet another series of traffic counts on El Camino Real
between Tamarack Avenue and Cannon Road, ostensibly for the annual traffic monitoring program.
However, they were unusual in that the counts spanned a five-day period (rather than the usual two or
three days), and they were collected at three different locations within the segment. So, they were
clearly done with the Marja Acres project in mind.
In any event, those counts confirmed the reliability of the November 2018 and May 2019 counts (and
the unreliability of the supplemental June 2019 counts), and indicated deficiency of southbound El
Camino Real. A subsequent series of meetings between staff, the applicant, and the applicant’s
contractors in late September 2019 led to the abandonment of the scheme to use the June 2019 traffic
counts and the old Carlsbad LOS method for CEQA purposes. However, many man-hours over multiple
months were spent on those endeavors before they were abandoned.
Premature switch to vehicle miles traveled (VMT) approach for CEQA purposes
So, there was again an opportunity to do the vehicle LOS study in the correct way and agree to provide
full mitigation through street projects and/or TSM and TDM initiatives. Instead, a new approach was
agreed upon—to entirely avoid doing vehicle LOS analysis for CEQA by prematurely switching to a VMT-
based approach for the Marja Acres project. That decision was made long before Carlsbad had any
guidelines on how to conduct VMT analysis, let alone the July 1, 2020 effective date of the rule change.
And this huge change in the study approach was made again without a formal TIA Scoping Agreement,
as required by the TIA Guidelines. I do not yet have full transparency on this phase of the project,
because staff did not provide any communications in response to my public records request in the six-
month period between September 30, 2019 and April 1, 2020.20
18 First section of the TIA Guidelines: “The Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines provide a detailed description
of the methodology to be followed in identifying project impacts for applicable transportation facilities in
compliance with applicable federal, state and local requirements (e.g., CEQA, GMP and the 2015 General Plan
Mobility Element).” 19 E.g., 8/15/2019, 8/19/2019, 8/20/2019, 8/21/2019, 8/22/2019 emails between city staff, the applicant, and the
applicant’s traffic consultant, including attached drafts of responses to my comments and guidance from staff 20I submitted a new public records request to fill the six-month gap, but on 10/15/2020 staff invoked an extension
beyond the 10-day response period.
8
The Marja Acres project was given special access to early drafts of the VMT Analysis Guidelines and was
conducting its VMT analysis as those guidelines were being developed—before they were made
available for review by the public, T&MC, or council. The VMT analysis was allegedly done based on a
March 2020 draft of the guidelines, which underwent multiple subsequent revisions. And the Marja
Acres recirculated DEIR (RDEIR) that contained the new VMT analysis had a review period that began on
June 5, 2020,21 before the VMT rule and guidelines were even adopted by council or took effect on July
1, 2020.22
There was another development doing a traffic study in the same timeframe, and it was more beneficial
for them to do LOS analysis rather than VMT. Thus, it is notable that staff stated at the July 15, 2020
public hearing for that development that its application “was deemed complete in October of 2018,”
that the switchover to VMT did not take effect until July 1, 2020, and that the city must “apply…the
standards that were in place when the application is deemed complete.” Counsel added that this must
be done for “fairness and propriety” to the developer. Commissioner Luna also made an impassioned
statement that, in fairness to the developer, the rules in place at that time had to be followed, which
was subsequently echoed by other commissioners.23
Fair enough, but in the case of Marja Acres, which benefits from VMT analysis, staff hypocritically cited
an agency’s ability to decide on a “project-by-project basis” to use the VMT standard,24 regardless of the
fact that the LOS standard was in place when the application was deemed complete on December 24,
2018, and regardless of the fact that the VMT Analysis Guidelines had not been finalized, let along gone
into effect.
Last-minute manipulation of LMA could cost city $100,000
Ultimately, I believe the types and the target levels of the mitigation being proposed to satisfy the CEQA
requirement will do little to mitigate the actual traffic impacts in the area. However, in addition to the
CEQA/VMT analysis, Carlsbad also still requires mobility analysis under the GMP, General Plan, and TIA
Guidelines in the form of an LMA, providing an additional opportunity for mitigation—in the case of
Marja Acres, focused on vehicles and transit (based on street typologies).
The GMP-based LMA should have been made available for review at the same time as the CEQA-based
VMT study in the EIR, because there are overlapping components and intertwined mitigation
strategies—and I requested as much. However, the Marja Acres LMA was actively undergoing changes
21 State of California Clearinghouse CEQAnet Web Portal entry for the Marja Acres RDEIR:
https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2018041022/3 22 Carlsbad City Council Resolution No. 2020-114 (VMT Analysis Guidelines adoption):
http://edocs.carlsbadca.gov/HPRMWebDrawer/RecordHTML/577938 23 7/15/2020 Carlsbad Planning Commission video: (https://carlsbadca.swagit.com/play/07152020-1315) (Item #1) 24 Response to public comment IND-R1.11i in the Marja Acres final EIR:
https://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=45676
9
almost right up to the September 16, 2020 Planning Commission public hearing, and I was not provided
a copy until about 24 hours in advance of that meeting, so there was little opportunity for reasonable
public review.
I was hoping that the LMA would provide meaningful additional traffic mitigation. Instead, it largely just
cites the VMT-based mitigation plan in the EIR, and then adds a bench and trash can at one bus stop,
and a bicycle rack and repair area in the project.
Sadly, still more serious shenanigans were done in the LMA in the form of a substantial last-minute
reduction in the project’s predicted net average daily vehicle trips (ADT), which will likely reduce the
traffic impact fee owed to the city by about $100,000.
The final EIR for the Marja Acres project released on 8/26/2020 states (Appendix J, Section 3.2):
With redevelopment of the site, the Project is calculated to generate 2,366 net new ADT per the
GMP/LMA prepared by LLG in August 2020…
In response to my public comment on the EIR (IND-R1.26 in the final EIR), staff stated that “the project
would result in 2,334 ADT. And Table 14 in the Planning Commission staff report released 9/10/2020
also refers to a net increase of 2,334 ADT.
The small discrepancy in those ADT is yet another traffic study error, and it is important to note that
every one of the dozens of previous draft and final traffic studies produced between 2016 and August
2020 had estimated trip generation of well over 2,000 ADT. However, the trip generation method was
changed in the days leading up to the 9/16/2020 Planning Commission meeting, which reduced it to just
901 ADT, and an erratum was prepared to “correct the outdated data.”
This change was driven by an artificial increase in the number of trips subtracted from the gross ADT
based on existing traffic at the project site, which will disappear when the current businesses are
demolished. The 2,366 net ADT figure is based on a 700 ADT reduction for the current businesses, which
was based on actual traffic counts at the business driveways. However, the last-minute change to 901
net ADT is based on a 2,133 ADT reduction for the current businesses, which was calculated from a
SANDAG estimator tool.
Email exchanges in late August and early September 2020 about this change in the trip generation
method show that there was pushback, in that it was pointed out that the “existing [businesses] are old
and underperforming,” that the driveway counts were very recent, and that using the driveway count
data “is a better approach.” But staff ignored that sound engineering judgement and directed the last-
minute switch to the estimation method that they knew was overestimating current traffic by more than
three-fold, thereby reducing net ADT by nearly 1,500 ADT—potentially costing the city around $100,000
in impact fees.
10
During the 9/16/2020 Planning Commission public hearing, staff rejected my claim that this was a
shenanigan. They (ironically) claimed that they were bound by the TIA Guidelines to use the SANDAG
estimator. But that claim is just more shenanigans. The guidelines do not require the use of the SANDAG
estimator. They indicate that the estimator should be “considered” for use, but other alternative
approaches are suggested, and it is clear in the guidelines that the city is supposed to work with the
developer to come up with the most accurate method.
Thus, it was neither necessary nor appropriate to discard the actual traffic count data in favor of an
estimate. I encourage you to read the entire Traffic Generation portion (Section 5) of the TIA Guidelines
to come to your own conclusions. This represents poor engineering judgement and poor public policy.
Last-minute manipulation of trip generation numbers invalidates LMA
“Trip generation” is one of the first steps in a traffic study, and all of the subsequent steps rely on its
accuracy. Obviously, the artificial reduction from 2,300+ ADT to 901 ADT also artificially reduces all of
the traffic projected to be added to the streets, so any impacts on congestion, turn lanes, etc. will be
under-estimated.
Sincerely,
Steve Linke
Carlsbad, CA
1
Teri Delcamp
From:Linda Geldner <linda@geldner.com>
Sent:Saturday, September 26, 2020 5:54 PM
To:Teri Delcamp
Cc:Don Neu; Paz Gomez; Ronald Kemp; Velyn Anderson; Celia Brewer
Subject:Marja Acres EIR- Linda Geldner Env concerns and comments
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
Teri,
Thank you for all your hard work on this project. I strongly believe the two issues I discuss below should be
covered in the EIR. Solution wise, a simple addendum may resolve this without recirculating the EIR and
would help protect the City should there be any lawsuits in the future. I have provided additional information
to Ron and Celia under separate cover. I copied Paz and Celia because I think there may be implications
beyond this project. I also copied Velyn since she is the Chair for the Planning Commission.
Fuel Oil Line
In my professional opinion a discussion of the Kinder Morgan (KM) fuel line should be in the EIR, since it is a
“recognized environmental condition”. The developer called it a “gas” line during the meeting. It is a fuel oil
line, which has very different implications. Old fuel lines (installed prior to 1990ish) are notorious for leaking,
which happens a lot on military bases. I have shared some of my lessons learned below. The developer was
also not able to provide any info about the line during the meeting, but said he was “in contact with KM”. Staff
commented that this fuel oil line was identified when ECR was widened, so this line may not have been
identified when the 2015 Phase 1 was done. Applicant also did not have his Phase 1 consultant at the meeting.
It is in the developer’s interest and the City’s to get clarity on this line now.
Questions that I recommend be answered as part of an addendum to the EIR:
1. Is there an easement on record?
a. Year signed
b. Any clean‐up or removal requirements in the easement?
2. Info about the line:
a. What year was it installed?
b. What material is the pipe?
c. When was it last used?
d. How long was it used?
e. What type(s) of fuel oils were pumped?
f. Is it maintained in operable condition?
g. Was the line ever replaced? If so:
i. What year?
ii. What type of pipe was used?
iii. Was there any clean‐up of soils or groundwater?
h. If it is/was ever steel, was there a cathodic protection system and was that system maintained?
2
3. Since the line was discovered during the ECR widening is there information available on the line from
that construction project?
Answers to these questions should be enough for the developer’s environmental team to make a
recommendation on what, if any, further actions are required and for the City and RWQCB to decide if they
agree.
Here are two articles related to abandoned fuel lines. Note that people were injured on Camp Pendleton and
the USMC has sued KM.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut‐sherman‐underground‐pipeline‐little‐known‐in‐2012sep18‐
story.html
https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/news/your‐marine‐corps/2018/11/02/marines‐file‐federal‐lawsuit‐
against‐gas‐and‐pipeline‐companies‐after‐camp‐pendleton‐aav‐gas‐line‐fire/
Agricultural water pollution
It is a scientific fact that agricultural “legacy” chemicals can affect water quality for decades. Please see the
links below and especially the USGS report dated 2018. In my professional opinion the EIR on this project
should at a minimum discuss this (by addendum) and state why they do or do not recommend further testing.
Then the City/RWQCB can concur or not with their recommendations.
While we do not drink our groundwater or surface run‐off, it does drain into our lagoons including surcharge
from groundwater. Slowflow through the ground can take years or decades. Sediments have also been found
to contain legacy chemicals years after use. If I am not mistaken the City is responsible under a RWQRB
discharge permit for Water Quality, so may already have sediment and/or water samples for the stream. If so,
that should be included in the EIR addendum too. Note that the last link below is to a 216‐page report I
reviewed and provided page numbers (document page not pdf) for the most pertinent information.
https://www.usgs.gov/special‐topic/water‐science‐school/science/pesticides‐groundwater?qt‐
science_center_objects=0#qt‐science_center_objects
https://webapps.usgs.gov/rsqa/#!/
https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1433/cir1433.pdf Titled‐ A River Runs Through It dated 2018. Specifically see:
P. 8 good illustration and discussion of drainage, hydrology and slowflow to groundwater
P. 30 NAWGA Nation WQ Assessment
P. 90‐92 Drainage, slowflow and storage
P. 138 para 5 Nitrite
P. 139 Agricultural affect on Water Quality
P. 150‐153 Legacy chemicals, long lifetimes, detection in sediments, summary
My fuel oil lessons learned:
If you have not worked on DoD projects, you may not know what to expect from fuel oil. Fuel oil is typically
lighter than water, so when you hit ground water, if there has been a leak, fuel will surface and if there is a
plume it will move. When working for NAVFAC we chased fuel leaks on many occasions. It is better to identify
and resolve any soil or ground water contamination before construction starts or it can cause costly delays.
Also the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) was one of my DoD clients from 1998 to 2002. My staff was
responsible for inspecting, scoping and managing projects for fuel lines, fuel storage tanks and their cathodic
protection systems world‐wide. If memory serves me, we started using a new composite pipe in the late
1990’s that did not require cathodic protection. Cathodic protection systems were often not well maintained,
so most older lines leaked. We also replaced the fuel line that runs through Point Loma up to Miramar and
cleaned up lots of soil and water under RCRA.
3
I hope everyone understands that I could not just ignore this, since it is a health and safety issue. I have done
my best to identify a possible solution that honors the CEQA process while keeping the project safe and
(hopefully) on schedule. Thanks again Teri for all your hard work on this challenging project. I am available to
discuss and/or answer questions.
Kind Regards,
Linda
linda geldner, r.a. / principal
web: www.geldner.com
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
~, geldner group
-----~------------------------------------------------------
1
Teri Delcamp
Subject:FW: Marja Acres EIR- Linda Geldner Env concerns and comments
From: Teri Delcamp
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 3:43 PM
To: Linda Geldner <linda@geldner.com>
Cc: Don Neu <Don.Neu@carlsbadca.gov>; Paz Gomez <Paz.Gomez@carlsbadca.gov>; Ronald Kemp
<Ronald.Kemp@carlsbadca.gov>; Velyn Anderson <VelynA@msn.com>; Celia Brewer <Celia.Brewer@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: RE: Marja Acres EIR‐ Linda Geldner Env concerns and comments
Hi Linda –
Staff has reviewed your comments below and has the following responses:
Fuel Line
According to the owner of the fuel line, Kinder Morgan, the SFPP (Kinder Morgan) line is a 10” LS 122 line which
runs from Orange to Miramar Station. The line is no longer utilized. The line was cleaned, purged with nitrogen
and has been out of service since 1987. There are no leaks or incidents on the line that were reported in any of
the databases consulted in the preparation of the Phase I environmental site assessment for the project. Staff
has also reconfirmed that no incidents have been reported on the line within Carlsbad per the National Pipeline
Mapping System. No prior documentation of incidents or issues with the line are on file in association with prior
projects including the Robertson Ranch EIR or Toll Brothers’ widening of El Camino Real. At least two other prior
development projects have been approved and constructed or are under construction in proximity to the
abandoned fuel line – Summit Senior and West Coast Self Storage. The line did not need to be addressed in any
way by Summit Senior because the line is within abandoned right‐of‐way that fronts the project site and is not
owned by Summit Senior. West Coast Self Storage addressed the line in the same way proposed by the Marja
Acres project, which was to work with Kinder Morgan to cap and abandon the line. Due to the fact that the line
has been out of service for 33 years and there is no evidence of leaks or incidents associated with the line, there
is no substantial evidence that further analysis and revisions to the project’s CEQA documentation or EIR are
warranted.
Agricultural Water Quality
The links to USGS documents are informative for managing agricultural operations relative to water quality. The
project is subject to regulatory standards and requirements of the California Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC) and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. The project site was appropriately characterized
in the Phase I environmental site assessment( ESA) prepared for the project. The Phase I ESA was conducted in
accordance with all applicable standards and requirements by professionals qualified to do so, including DTSC’s
Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision) dated August 7, 2008. As discussed in the
project EIR Section 5.2, the former agricultural use of the project site was not in long‐term animal raising or crop
production. Beginning circa 1953 for about 10 years, the site was primarily a chicken and egg farm. Per the EIR,
“as the surrounding area developed with residences, neighbors complained about odor and insects, leading the
farm to close in 1963. No agricultural activity occurred on the site from 1963 to 1991. From 1991 to 2009 the
parcel was used for crop production under short‐term farm leases. The city indicates that crop production was
unsuccessful due to rising costs and poor soil conditions. Since 2010, Habitat Restoration Sciences has used the
southern parcel to cultivate native plants in containers for off‐site restoration projects.” As stated on EIR page
5.8‐4, a portion of the project site is currently occupied by a palm tree farm and has pesticide storage on the
southern portion. Because use for agricultural purposes can be a potential concern due to the possible use of
2
pesticides and heavy metals containing herbicides, and to determine whether the agricultural use of the project
site represented a recognized environmental condition (REC), the Phase I ESA included laboratory analysis of the
collected soil samples for the presence of organochlorine pesticides (such as such as DDT, Toxaphene, and
dieldrin), arsenic, and total lead. No contaminated soils that represent a REC were identified. These findings
were reiterated in several responses to comments that were provided by the public on the Draft EIR. EIR Section
5.9 discusses water quality and the project’s water quality management plan will require and ensure that best
management practices are implemented in compliance with applicable regulations during grading/construction
as well as the operation of the project to address any potential water quality impacts associated with
construction and operation of the project. Due to the presence of a small drainage ditch on the property, the
applicant has coordinated with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) in the event a permit is
required from the agency which is addressed in the project’s mitigation measures. No issues or concerns have
been raised by the RWQCB prior to or during the public review period for the Draft EIR; the RWQCB was
provided with notice of and access to review the Draft EIR through the State Clearinghouse, and provided no
comments on the project EIR. Therefore, there is no substantial evidence that further analysis and revisions to
the project’s CEQA documentation or EIR are warranted.
Thank you,
Teri
Teri Delcamp
Principal Planner
Community Development Department
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
www.carlsbadca.gov
760‐602‐4611 | teri.delcamp@carlsbadca.gov
DURING THE CURRENT PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY:
FOR ONGOING PROJECTS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR PROJECT PLANNER TO SCHEDULE A RESUBMITTAL DROP‐OFF
APPOINTMENT.
FOR NEW PROJECT SUBMITTALS AND LANDSCAPE SUBMITTALS/RESUBMITTALS/ASBUILTS, PLEASE CALL OR EMAIL
YOUR REQUEST FOR A SUBMITTAL DROP‐OFF APPOINTMENT, AND ALLOW APPROXIMATELY TWO BUSINESS DAYS
FOR CONFIRMATION OF THE APPOINTMENT DATE AND TIME, TO:
Phone: 760‐602‐4610
Email: planning@carlsbadca.gov
Facebook | Twitter | You Tube | Flickr | Pinterest |Enews
~ City of
Carlsbad
1
Teri Delcamp
Subject:FW: Marja Acres Project
Attachments:Comments & Responses to Comments on DEIR.pdf; ATT00001.htm; Planning Commission
Attachment.pdf; ATT00002.htm
Begin forwarded message:
From: Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Date: September 28, 2020 at 8:35:31 AM PDT
Subject: FW: Marja Acres Project
From: Jen Rich <jmrfunder@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 9:09 PM
To: Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Cc: Greg Funderburk <smoqetr@gmail.com>
Subject: Marja Acres Project
Dear Carlsbad Council Members, This email concerns the Marja Acres Project. We are homeowners that live adjacent to the proposed development. We commented on the Draft Environmental Impact Report
(EIR), reviewed the responses to our comments in the Final EIR, and submitted an
email with an attachment to the Planning Division ahead of the September 16, 2020 Planning Commission Public Hearing. As requested, our email was read into the record.
This process has been frustrating to say the least. I have been an Environmental
Scientist with the California Environmental Protection Agency’s Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) for nearly 28 years. It is important to note that I am not commenting as an employee with the State of California, but rather as a concerned Carlsbad resident and stakeholder. I understand the environmental assessment
process as well as the public involvement process.
To be clear, we are not opposed to the Marja Acres Project. We understand that eventually the property directly behind our fence line will be developed. What we are concerned about is that the project site was not adequately characterized and we
strongly believe further characterization is warranted. There is insufficient information to
make the determination that the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials/substances into the environment. Without proper characterization, it is impossible to determine the extent of
contamination at the project site, and whether appropriate mitigation measures have
been identified in the EIR that would ensure the protection of human health (construction workers and people living near the project site) and the environment.
2
The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Final EIR, Appendix F) concluded there was “no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the Property” and that “no further investigation appears to be warranted at this time.” This
conclusion is not surprising given the following:
Only 20 soil borings were taken over the 20+ acre project site, even though the DTSC Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision) dated August 7, 2008 recommends 30 borings. Please note that the Response
to Comments on the Final EIR cite the 2008 DTSC Interim Guidance in regards
to the soil sampling methodology utilized at the project site.
No biased, discrete sampling was conducted in areas where contamination would likely be present.
No samples were taken in the known pesticide storage areas, and it does not appear samples were taken in the known hazardous substances/chemical storage areas.
No soil samples were taken in the driplines of the pre-1978 buildings and structures (existing or formerly demolished), where one would expect to find elevated lead levels from lead-based paint.
Soil samples were not analyzed for paraquat, a highly toxic weed killer
(herbicide). Given the historical information provided, soil samples should have
been analyzed for a broader number of constituents, including paraquat. During construction, especially along the backyard fence lines of many of the homes on Park Drive that are adjacent to the project site, and where significant grading is planned,
dust is a big concern. There are also sensitive receptors near the project site, including, but not limited to a residential community, an elementary school, and a park. The Final EIR, Section 5.3 Air Quality, states that “implementation of the proposed project would not result in a significant impact on air quality; therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed.” In response to one of our comments on the Draft EIR, IND-62.26 states, “As
described on EIR page 5.3-13, the proposed project is subject to SDAPCD Rule 55, Fugitive Dust Control. This rule requires that the project take steps to restrict visible emissions of fugitive dust beyond the property line. Compliance with Rule 55 would limit fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5) generated during grading and construction activities. No monitoring is proposed as compliance with Rule 55 would effectively
reduce dust from construction activities.” Since the project site has not been adequately characterized, we do not know the possible extent of contamination. We do know that no biased, discrete sampling was conducted in areas where contamination would likely be present; no samples were taken in the known pesticide storage areas, and no soil samples were taken in the driplines of the pre-1978 buildings and structures (existing or
formerly demolished), where one would expect to find elevated lead levels from lead-based paint. Without proper characterization, it is impossible to know whether the proposed project would result in a significant impact on air quality, and whether mitigation measures are needed to ensure the protection of public health.
We have been in contact with Ms. Kris Wright, and are hoping to meet with some, or all of you, in person prior to the October 20, 2020 Council Meeting. We thought it appropriate to send some information ahead of any meetings so that you have an
3
opportunity to review the materials. We have attached our comments and the responses to our comments (IND-62.1-62.28) on the Draft EIR, including the references to other response to comments (i.e., IND-4.1, IND-12.8, and IND-22.1-22.22), as well as
the attachment we provided to the Planning Division ahead of the September Planning
Commission Public Hearing. Our main concern is for the protection of human health during the construction. We hope you will consider our input prior to making any final decisions on the proposed Marja Acres Project.
Sincerely, Jennifer Rich and Greg Funderburk Park Drive Homeowners jmrfunder@gmail.com and smoqetr@gmail.com
Attachments Link to Final EIR:
https://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=45676
Link to Final EIR, Appendix F, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment: https://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=45680
Link to DTSC Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision) dated August 7, 2008: https://dtsc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2020/06/Ag-Guidance-Rev-3-August-7-2008-2_Accessible.pdf
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
May 29, 2019
Teri Delcamp, Principal Planner
Carlsbad Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Ms. Delcamp:
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Malja Acres Project
Below, are our official comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
proposed Marja Acres project:
In April 2018, the City of Carlsbad requested public comment on the proposed Marja
Acres project, and the scope and content of environmental issues to be examined in the
EIR. We and many others submitted comments. Many of those comments addressed
concerns regarding the potential for hazardous substances to be present on the project
site due to the historic agricultural use of the property (circa 1953). Additionally, old
buildings and structures are located on the project site so there is a potential for
asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead based paint (LBP) to be present.
The Draft EIR acknowledges that due to the age of the existing structures on the project
site (constructed circa 1950), ACMs and LBP are likely to be present. It goes on to say
that "the potential presence of ACMs and LBP on the project site is a significant impact
to the public and environment, specifically when existing structures are demolished as
part of the proposed project.· Because "the proposed project has the potential to create
a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of ACMs and LBP into the
environment", the Draft EIR proposes "implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1",
which "would reduce this potentially significant impact to a level less than significant."
Unfortunately, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 does not address the potential for lead from
LBP to be in the soil surrounding the structures.
We know that LBP may be present on buildings and structures that were constructed
prior to 1978. This in tum creates the possibility that, through the action of normal
weathering and maintenance. there may be lead from LBP in the soil surrounding these
buildings and structures. The soil around pre-1978 buildings and structures should be
tested for lead. Appendix F of the Draft EIR shows that 20 soil borings were taken
around the 20+ acre property and analyzed for lead, however, none of those samples
appear to be located in the driplines of those structures (see Figure No. 2, Property
Plan), which is where you would expect to find elevated lead levels. Why weren't an
adequate number of samples taken in the driplines of all pre-1978 buildings and
structures and analyzed for lead? Results should be compared to the California
residential screening level for lead, which is 80 mg/kg. Table 1 in Appendix F shows
Page l of 6
IND-62.1
IND-62.2
City of Carlsbad August 2020 I 0.2-287
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project
that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) residential regional
screening levels (RSLs) were used for lead at 400 mg/kg. The lower California
screening level should be used. It is not surprising that the highest hit of lead was 34
mg/kg given that none of the 20 soil samples analyzed were taken from the drip lines of
the pre-1978 buildings and structures. Additional sampling and analyses should be
performed.
Appendix F of the Draft EIR says there are "multiple out-buildings used for storage of
pesticides and hazardous materials.• Please provide a table that lists all of the
buildings and structures located on the project site and include the dates of
construction, the type of buildings/structures {e.g., residential home. pesticide storage,
mixing, etc.), and the size.
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was conducted and, as noted above, limited
soil testing was performed (Phase II). The report, prepared for New Urban West, Inc.
by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. is located in Appendix F of the Draft EIR. It's titled
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Shallow Soil Sampling, dated October 13,
2015. In addition to addressing ACMs and LBP, the Phase 1 and Phase II
Environmental Site Assessments address pesticides. The Draft EIR Impact Analysis,
Impact 5.8-2 Release of Hazardous Materials into the Environment asks the question
"Would the proposed project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?" Wrth regard to pesticides, the Draft EIR
(page 5.8-9) states that "Based upon the soil analytical results, the agricultural use of
the project site does not represent a REC or a human health risk in light of the
contemplated residential use of the project site. Therefore, implementation of the
proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment. This is considered a less than significant
impact."
The Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (Appendix F of the Draft
EIR) are not adequate for characterizing the contamination at the project site. If
contamination is present at levels that are unsuitable for a mixed-use scenario,
including residential use, then people will be at risk. Additionally, when the project site
is graded and dirt is being moved around, there is potential for construction workers and
those living near the project site to become exposed to contaminants through various
exposure routes. It is imperative the project site be adequately characterized so that
appropriate mitigation measures can be taken to ensure the protection of human health
(construction workers, people living near the project site. and future residents) and the
environment.
In reviewing the Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments in Appendix F of
the Draft EIR, it was noted that only 20 soil borings were taken over the 20+ acre project
site. The number of soil borings is inadequate for proper characterization. Focused or
Page 2 of 6
j IND-62.2,
cont.
] IND62.3
IND-62.4
IND-62.5
l lND•62.6
0.2-288 I August 2020 City of Carlsbad
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project
biased samples should have been taken in mixing/loading/storage/wash-down areas,
drainage ditches, fann houses, and outbuildings, and as noted above, along the drip
lines of pre-1978 buildings and structures. Figure No. 2, Property Plan (Appendix F of
the Draft EIR) shows the locations of the 20 borings. In looking at the figure, it's
impossible to see all of the individual buildings/structures and almost none of them are
labeled. What is very noticeable is that samples don't appear to have been taken in
areas where one might expect a spill or release to have occurred. Also, there were no
soil borings along the fence lines of the residential homes on Park Drive that are
adjacent to the project site. Please explain the sampling methodology used in the
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, and specifically explain why focused or
biased sampling doesn't appear to have been conducted. Please provide figures that
clearly identify all buildings/structures, including those that have been removed or
demolished, and properly label all of the various areas, especially noting storage,
mixing/loading, and wash-down areas. One figure is not sufficient.
Twenty samples were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), arsenic and lead.
Please explain why only twenty soil samples were analyzed. Also, please explain why
other classes of pesticides/herbicides, paraquat, metals, and petroleum related
compounds were not analyzed. A routine analysis for paraquat is not usually performed
for field areas, but storage and mixing/loading areas are good places to sample for the
herbicide.
Were soil samples analyzed for chlorpyrifos? If not. why weren't they analyzed for
chlorpyrifos?
Were fumigants used on the project site? If so, there is a possibility that groundwater
could be contaminated with 1,2,3-trichloropropane (TCP), a contaminant that occurred
in the manufacture of two commonly used soil fumigants used in California to manage
nematodes. TCP is a persistent pollutant in groundwater and has been classified as
"likely to be carcinogenic to humans· by the USEPA.
It doesn't appear as though any groundwater samples were taken at the project site to
rule out groundwater contamination. Please explain why no groundwater samples were
taken.
Page 8.1 of Appendix F says that "Based on the site inspection, review of adjacent
properties, and available environmental records, the likelihood for vapor intrusion at the
Site is considered low ... • It doesn't appear as though soil gas testing was performed as
part of the Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments. Please explain why
soil gas samples were not taken to rule out the vapor intrusion to indoor air pathway.
The Draft EIR says that there was no visible evidence of any underground storage
tanks/structures. Other than a visual inspection and searching databases for evidence
of underground storage tanks/structures, was any other mechanism utilized (e.g.,
Page3 of 6
]
J
l
]
]
IND-62.6,
cont.
IND-62.7
IND-62.8
IND-62.9
IND-62.10
IND-62.11
l lND-62.12
City of Carlsbad August 2020 I 0.2-289
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project
ground penetrating radar)? If not, why not? Will there be a contingency plan in place if
underground storage tanks/structures or other previously unidentified contamination is
discovered during the planned excavation and grading activities?
According to the Draft EIR there is a septic tank located on the project site. Please
explain what will be done with the septic tank.
Did the owners ever bum on site? If so, those areas should be tested for dioxin.
Page 1 of the 2015 Stantec Report (Appendix F of the Draft EIR) is signed by Mr. Kyle
Emerson, Managing Principal Geologist, PG. Why isn't it stamped?
The Draft EIR (pages 5.8-1 and 8-2) references the Phase I Environmental Sfte
Assessment and Shallow Soil Sampling (Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec)
2018). Why is this a 2018 reference when the document is dated October 13, 2015?
The Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments are over 3 ½ years old.
Why isn't there a more recent environmental site assessment? When did agricultural
operations cease at the project site? What has the property been used for since
agricultural operations ceased?
Was the County Agricultural Commissioner consulted regarding this project site? They
may or may not have specific information on file, but they will often have extensive
knowledge of the farming practices over many years.
Draft EIR, Appendix F, Section 6.0, Interviews: This only shows that the owner was
interviewed. Was anyone else interviewed, for instance, people that used to work in the
fields?
In the Draft EIR, Appendix F Part 2 oontains Appendix E, Laboratory Analytical Report.
On page 4 of 39 it says the following:
GCSemlVOA
Method(s) 8081A: The closing continuing calibration verification (CCV) standard
associated with batch 440-283538 failed to meet acceptance limits. The associated
samples were re-analyzed following a successful CCV and produced similar results,
indicating that the sample matrix is adversely affecting the instrument and causing the
failures.HA-1-1 (440-122379-1), HA-2-1 (440-122379-3), HA-3-1(440-122379-5), HA-4-1
(440-122379-7), HA-5-1 (440-122379-9), HA-6·1 (440-122379-11}, HA-9-1 (440-122379-
17), HA-16-1(440-122379-31), HA-19-1 (440-122379-37), (CCV 440-283538/36} and (CCV
440-283538/37)
Page4 of 6
j IND-62.12,
cont.
J IND-62.13
) IND-62.14
J IND-62.15
] IND-62.16
l IND-62.17
] IND-62.18
] IND-62.19
IND-62.20
0.2-290 I August 2020 City of Carlsbad
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or In
the Definitions/Glossary page.
Please explain what occurred above regarding the "failures". How would this bias the
results (i.e., high or low)?
Why do the reporting limits (Rls) for Chlordane (technical) vary from 49 ug/Kg to 100
ug/Kg, and for Toxaphene 190 ug/Kg to 420 ug/Kg? Also, why do the RLs for
Toxaphene seem so high? How does this affect the results?
There is a column for MDL (method detection limit), but there are no results listed.
Why?
Why does there appear to be only one QC sample result that includes Toxaphene?
In Table 1, Summary of Soil Analytical Results -Arsenic, Lead, and Pesticides
(Appendix F of the Draft EIR): The results for Toxaphene for samples HA-8-1 through
HA-20-1 do not match the lab results as shown in Appendix E. Laboratory Analytical
Report (Appendix F of the Draft EIR). Please reconcile the discrepancies and review
the table to ensure its accuracy.
Who Is the regulatory authority that approved the adequacy of the Phase I and Phase II
Environmental Site Assessments? Given that the property has been a former
agricultural site since the early 1950s, who is the regulatory authority that has
determined this property, a potentially contaminated site, is now suitable for mixed-use,
including residential reuse? Are there any approval fetters? If so, please provide
copies.
Significant grading is planned along the backyard fence lines of many of the homes on
Park Drive that are adjacent to the project site. We know that pesticides and herbicides
were used on the project site, and that grading will disturb the native soil. During all
phases of grading and excavation at the project site, will there be dust suppression
measures in place? If yes, please describe. If no, please elCplain. Will there be
continuous air monitoring for particulate and other airborne contaminants with publicly
available results? If yes, please describe. If no, please explain.
Based on all of the information provided in the Draft EIR, including its appendices, we
do not believe the proposed Marja Acres project site has been adequately
characterized. Therefore. we do not know if the project site is suitable for its proposed
mixed use, including residential reuse. If contamination exists on the project site at
levels that are not protective of human health and the environment, then people and the
environment will be at risk. Also, this proposed project, which calls for extensive
excavation and grading, could create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving
the release of hazardous substances into the environment. Until the project site is
properly characterized, additional mitigation measures cannot be taken to ensure the
Page 5 of6
j IND-62.20,
cont.
l IND-62.21
] IND-62.22
) IND-62.23
] IND-62.2◄
] IND6225
IND-62.26
IND-62.27
City of Carlsbad August 2020 I 0.2-291
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Maaa Acres Project
protection of public health and the environment. The City of Carlsbad should not
approve the proposed Marja Acres development until the project site has been
adequately characterized. If there is contamination present on the project site, whether
it be in groundwater, soil or soil gas, at levels that are not protective of human health
and the environment then it needs to be property mitigated.
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Draft EIR and for your consideration of our
comments. We look forward to receiving your written responses. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call Jennifer Rich at 714.392.2995.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Rich and Greg Fundert>urk
Park Drive Homeowners
jmrfunder@gmail.com and srnoqetr@gmail.com
Page 6 of 6
IND-62.27,
] IND-62.28
0.2-292 I August 2020 City of Carlsbad
Letter IND-62
0.2 Response to Comments I-"~
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project J ~
Jennifer Rich and Greg Funderburk
May 29, 2019
IND-62.1
IND-62.2
As identified on EIR page 5.8-4, lead based paint (LBP) has the potential to be present
within the existing structures on the project site, due to the age of the structures. Lead
is a highly toxic metal that was used until 1978 in paint and other products found in
and around residences. LBP has been banned since 1978, but many older structures
still have this paint on walls, woodwork, siding, windows, and doors. Due to the age of
the structures on the project site (constructed circa 1950), LBP is likely to be present
at the project site.
If determined to be present on-site, higher concentrations of LBP would be on the
buildings themselves where paint was applied (i.e., the walls, woodwork, etc). The
El R's finding regarding the potential impact associated with LBP is associated with the
actual demolition of these buildings where the LBP may be present on some of the
materials. The potential for the presence of LBP is addressed in Mitigation Measure
HAZ-1. Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires a LBP survey be conducted prior to
demolition. If LBP is identified, then all lead containing materials scheduled for
demolition must comply with applicable regulations for demolition methods and dust
suppression.
The soils sampling and laboratory analysis conducted on the project site included
organochlorine pesticides, arsenic, and total lead. Soil samples collected at a depth of
0.5-1 foot below ground surface (bgs) from the borings were submitted to a certified
analytical laboratory for analysis of organochlorine pesticides by EPA Method 8081A
and total arsenic and lead by EPA Method 6010B. Lead was reported in all 20 shallow
soil samples at concentrations ranging from 3.1 mg/kg to 34 mg/kg (mean Pb = 8.1
mg/kg) and well below the residential RSL of 400 mg/kg and within the naturally
occurring background level of 12.4 to 91. 7 mg/kg.
The California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) Human and Ecological
Risk Office (HERO) Human Health Risk Assessment (April 2019) residential screening
level for lead is currently 80 mg/kg. All soil samples were reported lead well below both
the EPA RSL (400 mg/kg) and DTSC HERO HHRA Note #3 (80 mg/kg) residential
screening levels.
The shallow soil samples were collected only to assess historical agricultural use
throughout the Property. There was no lead-based paint hazard assessment
performed on the structure and none of the soil sampling was conducted with any
intention of evaluating the potential lead-based paint hazards associated with the
structures. A pre demolition survey is required prior to removal of any pre-1978 building
or structures as addressed in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1.
IND-62.3 EIR Appendix F provides the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Shallow
Soil Sampling report. This report provides detailed information regarding the historic
uses of the property, and includes historic aerial photographs, historic topographic
maps, and city directories. These records indicate approximate dates of construction
and the uses of various buildings/occupants of the site.
IND-62.4 Comment noted. The comment does not raise a specific issue regarding the adequacy
of the EIR. Therefore, no further response is necessary.
IND-62.5 Please refer to responses to comments IND-4.1 and IND-22.1 through IND-22.22.
City of Carlsbad August 2020 I 0.2-293
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Mada Acres PrQject
IND-62.6
IND-62.7
IND-62.8
IND-62.9
IND-62.10
IND-62.11
The soil sampling methodology generally follows the Department of Toxic Substances
Control -Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Fields to determine the sampling
number and depths.
Based on the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) guidance listed in
Section 3.1 where sites are 20+ acres discrete samples should be collected "on 1-acre
centers" and Section 3.2 "Each located should be sampled to include one surface
sample (Oto 6 inches) and one subsurface sample (2 to 3 foot range). [Note: 0 inches
means first encountered soil. Thick mats of vegetable material, roots, and other
extraneous material should not be sampled.)"
Forty soil samples were collected from the 20 locations identified in the Phase I report
(i.e. two samples were collected at each location). The surface soil samples were
collected at approximately 1 foot below ground surface [(bgs) or 6" below the vegetable
material] and a second sample at approximately 3 feet bgs. The 20 shallow soil
samples were analyzed for arsenic, lead, and pesticides and the 20 deeper samples
were placed on hold in the lab. All the arsenic concentrations were below the California
background level of 11 mg/kg and lead and pesticides results were nearly an order of
magnitude less than their corresponding Residential Screening Levels (80 mg/kg).
Because the results of all the shallow soils sampling were well below the residential
screening levels, the 20 deeper samples were not analyzed which is consistent with
the Department of Toxic Substances Control -Interim Guidance for Sampling
Agricultural Field to determine the sampling number and depths.
Please refer to response to comment IND-62.6.
Soils samples were analyzed for organochloride pesticides (OCPs) such as DDT,
Toxaphene, and dieldrin by standard EPA Test Method 8081A. "OCPs are bio
persistent and bioaccumulated in the environment. Most other classes of pesticides
have relatively short half-lives and have not been found in the agricultural fields"
(DTSC, 2008). Chlorpyrifos would be included in this "other" class of pesticides. No
risk associated with the presence of Chlorpyrifos is identified because the OCPs that
were tested for as part of the soils sampling and analysis for the project site did not
exceed the EPA Test Method 8081A residential screening levels and no further testing
was warranted.
Fumigation was not reported as a method of pest control at this Property, therefore
fumigants were not selected as a compound of potential concern (COPC) as part of
the soil sampling assessment.
Based on the geotechnical evaluation for the project (EIR Appendix E), the regional
groundwater table currently occurs at a depth of approximately 14 to 17 feet below
surface grades across the site. Because surface sampling did not indicate the
presence of contaminated soils, no further evaluation was necessary at greater depths.
As indicated in the Phase I ESA (EIR Appendix E), based on the site inspection, review
of adjacent properties, and available environmental records, the likelihood for vapor
intrusion at the site is considered low based on the following:
• No releases are reported for adjacent sites or sites within a quarter mile
up-gradient relative to groundwater flow;
• No indication of manufacturing operations or use of hazardous materials was
identified for neighboring properties;
• No evidence of potential operations that would impact soil vapor was identified for
the Site; and
0.2•294 I August 2020 City of Carlsbad
IND-62.12
IND-62.13
IND-62.14
IND-62.15
IND-62.16
IND-62.17
IND-62.18
IND-62.19
City of Carlsbad
0.2 Response to Comments L "'-,.
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project r .I~
• Although evidence of agricultural use was identified, pesticides and associated
chemicals do not pose a vapor intrusion risk.
Please refer to response to comment IND-12.8.
The septic tank does not represent a recognized environmental concern (REC) and
therefore; is not considered a potential impact with respect to risk of contamination.
The septic tank will be cleaned-out, removed, and reported in accordance with
applicable regulatory requirements prior to site redevelopment activities.
No evidence of burns was observed during the site reconnaissance or through review
of aerial documentation and environmental databases.
A Phase I ESA must be completed by an Environmental Professional as defined in
312.20(e)(1) and 312.20(e)(2). A Professional Geologist is included in the list of
approved Environmental Professionals; however, a licensed stamp is not required as
part of a Phase I ESA.
EIR page 5.8-1 contained a typographical error. The Phase I ESA report is dated
October 13, 2015.
EIR page 5.8-1 has been revised as follows:
The hazardous materials information provided in this section is summarized
from the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Shallow Soil Sampling
(Stantec Consulting Services Inc. [Stantec] -Wl-8 2015) (Appendix F of this
EIR).
There have been no changes to the existing site operations on the project site since
preparation of the Phase I ESA. Agricultural operations have ceased. The nursery
continues to operate as it was during the 2015 survey.
Historical uses of the project site are reviewed as part of the environmental database
review conducted associated with the Phase I ESA report. For property under active
agricultural production, the owner/operator should be interviewed as the main source
of information to determine the type and amount of pesticides historically used on the
property. The Phase I ESA report was conducted in accordance with ASTM E 1527-13.
The scope of work conducted during the Phase I ESA consisted of a visual
reconnaissance of the project site, interviews with key individuals, and a review of
reasonably ascertainable documents.
Interviews conducted associated with the Phase I ESA was limited to the owner, as
identified in the Phase I ESA report. ASTM E 1527-13 notes that the availability of
record information varies from source to source. The User or Environmental
Professional is not obligated to identify, obtain, or review every possible source that
might exist with respect to a property. Instead, ASTM identifies record information that
is reasonably ascertainable from standard sources. "Reasonably ascertainable"
means:
(1) Information that is publicly available;
(2) Information that is obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost
constraints; and
(3) Information that is practicably reviewable.
August 2020 I 0.2-295
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project
IND-62.20
IND-62.21
IND-62.22
IND-62.23
IND-62.24
IND-62.25
IND-62.26
IND-62.27
IND-62.28
The primary analyses did not meet the closing calibration verification (CCV) standard
required by Test America Laboratory, Inc. (Test America), therefore, the samples were
re-run and the secondary CCV passed. The sample results between both runs were
similar, so no additional analyze was required by Test America.
The reporting limits (RLs) for each analyte (i.e. Chlordane and Toxaphene) is·
dependent on several factors including the analyte, sample matrix, concentration of
the analyte in the sample, and percent recovery of a sample against a known standard.
Test America is a state and national accredited laboratory and all samples passed their
quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) standards.
Method detection limit (MDL) are estimated value of the analyte less than the RL. All
analytes were reported using the more precise RL which was less than the residential
screening level, therefore, estimated MDL valves were not required to be obtained and
therefore, were also not reported.
Test America's standard matrix spike does not include Toxaphene, therefore,
Toxaphene is included in only one QA/QC sample.
The RL for sample HA-8-1 through HA-20-1 contain a typo, however, all Toxaphene
results are reported less than the RL and less than the residential screening levels.
The Phase I ESA report is not "approved" by any regulatory agency.
The Phase I ESA was prepared in accordance with conducted in conformance with the
requirements of American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation E
1527 -13 and All Appropriate Inquiries (AA() Final Rule 40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Part 312. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, the ASTM practice are described
in Section 2.3 of the Phase I ESA. The preparer of the report meets the definition of
Environmental Professional as defined in § 312.10 of 40 CFR 312, and has the specific
qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the
nature, history, and setting of the Property. The signed report states that the preparer
has developed and performed all the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the
standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
As described on EIR page 5.3-13, the proposed project is subject to SDAPCD Rule
55, Fugitive Dust Control. This rule requires that the project take steps to restrict visible
emissions of fugitive dust beyond the property line. Compliance with Rule 55 would
limit fugitive dust (PM,o and PM2.s) generated during grading and construction
activities. No monitoring is proposed as compliance with Rule 55 would effectively
reduce dust from construction activities.
Please refer to responses to comments IND-62.1 through IND-62.26.
Comment noted. The comment does not raise a specific issue regarding the adequacy
of the EIR. Therefore, no further response is necessary.
0.2-296 I August 2020 City of Carlsbad
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project
Letter IND-4
Tom Dana
April 23, 2019
IND-4.1
IND-4.2
IND-4.3
IND-4.4
EIR Section 5.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials addresses the potential for
hazardous materials on-site, including the potential for soil contamination. The Phase
I Environmental Site Assessment and Shallow Soil Sampling (Stantec Consulting
Services Inc. [Stantec] 2018) (Appendix F of the EIR) was conducted on the project
site to review, evaluate, and document present and past land uses and practices, and
visually examine site conditions in order to identify recognized environmental
conditions (REC).
The project site and adjacent land have been historically used for agricultural purposes
since circa 1953. As stated on EIR page 5.8-4, a portion of the project site is currently
occupied by a palm tree farm and has pesticide storage on the southern portion. Use
for agricultural purposes can be a potential concern due to the possible use of
pesticides and heavy metals containing herbicides. In order to determine whether the
agricultural use of the project site in fact represented a REC, shallow soil samples
were collected for laboratory analysis of organochlorine pesticides, arsenic, and total
lead. No contaminated soils that represent a REC have been identified. Please refer
to EIR Appendix F for details regarding the findings of the soils sampling.
Please also refer to responses to comments IND-22.1 through IND-22.21.
This comment refers to an existing condition and is not attributable to the proposed
project. As explained in EIR Chapter 5.9 Hydrology and Water Quality, the proposed
project will include drainage and flood control facilities to control runoff such that the
project would not cause or contribute to a flooding hazard. As shown on EIR Table
5.9-4, with the proposed project's biofiltration basins, the post-developed peak flows
would be reduced below the pre-developed levels for the 100-year storm. Therefore,
the proposed project would not substantially increase the rate of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in flooding on-or off-site and would not create or contribute
runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage system or provide substantial additional sources of runoff.
The city conducts annual or as-needed maintenance in the form of non-native
vegetation and sediment removal to improve water flow for the portion of Kelly Creek
that is improved/channelized (i.e., concrete lined). There is a portion of the creek at
the southeast corner of Kelly Drive and El Camino Real that is not improved, and is
not maintained by the city. Sediment removal is not appropriate or necessary in the
unimproved portion of the Creek, and regulatory permits would be required for any
non-native vegetation removal or channel modifications in this area. The city Public
Works Department is investigating the feasibility of non-native vegetation removal in
this area and would add this to its proposed Capital Improvement Program in the future
if regulatory permits are obtained.
The project proposes a 6-foot tall masonry wall along the southern perimeter of the
project site between the project site southern boundary and the existing residences to
the south.
Comment noted. The comment does not raise a specific issue regarding the adequacy
of the EIR. Therefore, no further response is necessary.
0.2-34 I August 2020 City of Carlsbad
IND-12.7
IND-12.8
0.2 Response to Comments 1-1111\"'\
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project ~~
with the San Luis Rey Band of Mission Indians and the Rincon Band of Luiseno
Indians. No known Tribal Cultural Resources or areas of religious or sacred importance
were revealed within the project boundaries. However, both the San Luis Rey Band of
Mission Indians and Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians identified this general area as
having cultural importance and being within their ancestral land. Please also refer to
response to comment ORG-2.1. Cultural Resources Mitigation Measures CR-1 and
CR-8 have been finalized as a result of the city's consultations with the tribes (see EIR
pages 5.5-17 through 5.5-19).
No contaminated soils have been identified on the project site. Based upon the soil
analytical results, the agricultural use of the project site does not represent a
recognized environmental condition (REC) or a human health risk in light of the
contemplated residential use of the project site. Therefore, implementation of the
proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment. This is considered a less than significant
impact. Please also refer to responses to comments IND-4.1 and IND-22.1 through
lND-22.21.
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) was conducted for the
proposed project, which included a reconnaissance of the project site to determine the
potential presence of underground storage tanks (UST) and above ground storage
tanks (ASD. No visible evidence (fill pipes, vent pipes, dispensers, surface patches),
which would indicate the presence of USTs was discovered during the site
reconnaissance. Also, no evidence, reports, or other evidence of the former presence
of USTs, was discovered during the Phase I ESA. Additionally, no visible evidence (fill
pipes, vent pipes, dispensers, surface stains), reports, or other evidence of present or
former ASTs was discovered during the Phase I ESA.
In addition to the project site reconnaissance, environmental data research with the
local fire and building department along with the Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) Geotracker website and the State's UST database was conducted, which
did not reveal the potential presence of underground-or above-ground storage tanks.
Any USTs discovered during grading will be properly removed and assessed under
the oversight of the local agency (e.g., County of San Diego Department of
Environmental Health).
IND-12.9 Comment noted. The comment does not raise a specific issue regarding the adequacy
of the EIR. Therefore, no further response is necessary. Please refer to response to
comment IND-12.11 regarding the provision of affordable housing units.
IND-12.10 The potential noise impacts referenced in this comment (construction noise and
potential noise from roof decks) is evaluated in detail in EIR Chapter 5.11 Noise.
Please also refer to responses to comments IND-11.4 and IND-13.4.
IND-12.11 The proposed number of affordable housing units did not decrease from the previously
proposed plan, as is suggested in this comment. The originally proposed plan included
35 affordable housing units and 15 deed-restricted units. For a project of this size, the
city considered the 15 deed-restricted units as not enforceable and potentially not
available for rent; therefore, the city did not accept the proposed deed-restricted units
under the previously-proposed plan. Moreover, the city's position was that 35
affordable units were not enough units for a viable affordable project. The currently
proposed project includes 46 affordable units, which meets or exceeds the city's
inclusionary and density bonus affordable unit requirements, and the city has
City of Carlsbad August 2020 I 0.2-53
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project
Letter IND-22
Kristine Wright
May 25, 2019
IND-22.1
IND-22.2
IND-22.3
Toxaphene was identified as present at unacceptable levels on the Robertson Ranch
project site and the soils were removed and contained in accordance with regulatory
requirements. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) prepared
for the Marja Acres project addresses the potential presence of Toxaphene and
includes sampling. Toxaphene was not identified as a potential environmental concern
based on the results of the soils sampling.
No elevated levels of pesticides have been identified on the project site. Therefore,
there is no potential for runoff to carry pesticides into adjacent water bodies. Please
also refer to response to comment IND-4.2.
EIR Section 5.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials address the potential presence of
hazardous materials including contaminated soils on the project site.
As described in EIR Section 5.8, the Phase I ESA was conducted on the project site
to review, evaluate, and document present and past land uses and practices, and
visually examine site conditions in order to identify recognized environmental
conditions (REC). The detailed technical report is provided in EIR Appendix F. No
contaminated soils have been identified on the project site. This initial effort included
an environmental data search and site reconnaissance for the project site to determine
whether there are any documented hazardous materials listings for the project site and
vicinity, as well as a physical inspection of the site to determine whether there is the
potential presence of hazards materials on the site including septic tanks, underground
storage tanks, or above-ground storage tanks. No RE Cs were identified based on this
initial data base search and site reconnaissance.
Limited soils sampling and testing was also conducted which consisted of soil samples
from 20 locations on the project site (see EIR page 5.8-4) with shallow soil sampling
at approximately one foot and deeper soil samples collected at three feet below ground
surface. Since pesticides are at their highest concentrations at or near the ground
surface, the shallow soil samples were analyzed, and deep samples placed on hold
pending shallow soil sample results. No unacceptable results were reported in the
shallow soil; therefore, the deeper samples did not require analyses as per DTSC
guidelines. The result of this soils testing indicates that the agricultural use of the
project site does not represent a REC or a human health risk in light of the
contemplated residential use of the project site.
Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.
It is recognized that portions of the project site have been farmed. Additionally, the site
has been disturbed, and at times graded or otherwise tilled associated with site
improvements, on-going nursery operations and limited agriculture that has occurred
in the southern portion of the site. Because soils are not considered to represent an
REC or a human health risk, grading associated with implementation of the project is
not anticipated to create a risk to human health, or as a result of potential stormwater
runoff which would drain into Agua Hedionda Creek. Furthermore, best management
practices to address potential erosion and water quality would be implemented during
grading/construction as well as the operation of the project. EI R Section 5. 9 Hydrology
and Water Quality addresses potential surface water quality impacts associated with
construction and operation of the project.
0.2-178 I August 2020 City of Carlsbad
IND-22.4
IND-22.5
IND-22.6
0.2 Response to Comments l..:)""'
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project r , ~
Comment noted. As part of the Phase I ESA. a request was made to Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regarding files for the Property. According to agency
correspondence, no records are available for the property (see EIR Appendix F page
4.4). Furthermore, no evidence of USTs, ASTs or groundwater contamination on the
project site exists based on the Phase I ESA report.
Please refer to response to comment IND-22.3.
Please refer to response to comment IND-22.3. Soil sampling at the project site was
performed in general accordance with DTSC's Interim Guidance for Sampling
Agricultural Properties (Third Revision) dated August 7, 2008. No REC's have been
identified on the project site. No cleanup action is required.
Provision of stormwater permits to the commenter "to insure that no further
contaminants enter the lagoon" is not necessary as the project will be required to meet
water quality standards. As required by Mitigation Measure WQ-1, the applicant shall
prepare and submit for review and approval of the Carlsbad City Engineer, a SWPPP
to demonstrate that pollutants will be controlled through compliance with the City of
Carlsbad Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, General
Construction Stormwater Permit (Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ, NPDES CAS000002),
and the General Municipal Stormwater Permit (R9-2013-0001, as amended by Order
Nos. R9-2015-0001 and R9-2015-0100, NPDES No. CAS0109266). The applicant
shall be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the project's BMP erosion control
measures on a weekly basis in accordance with the city's grading and erosion control
requirements (Municipal Code Section 15.16. et seq.).
IND-22.7 Please refer to response to comment IND-22.3 and IND-62.6.
IND-22.8 According to DTSC's Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (2008),
Section 3.0 Sampling Strategies "While paraquat does have a longer half-life, it has
either not been detected or detected rarely at trace levels at sites which DTSC has
had oversight, therefore routine analyses for paraquat is not required for field areas."
In addition, Paraquat Dichloride is not included in the DTSC's standard organochlorine
pesticide (OCPs) list analyzed by EPA Test Method 8081A. Paraquat Dichloride has
a noncancer residential screening level of 280 mg/kg (DTSC April 2019) which is
several orders of magnitude higher than other pesticides included on the EPA Test
Method 8081A list. Given the elevated noncancer residential screening level for
Paraquat Dichloride, it is not a Chemical of Potential Concern (COPC) by DTSC.
(Table 2, 2008).
IND-22.9 All soil samples were collected as per DTSC guidelines and OCP and heavy metal
results were compared to DTSC's residential screening levels. All results were
reported below their corresponding residential screening levels and review by a
registered environmental professional. The residential screening levels are used to
determine if there is an unacceptable risk to future residents or a need for oversight by
DTSC or other regulatory agency.
IND-22.10 Comment noted. Please also refer to responses to comments IND-22.11 through
IND-22.21.
IND-22.11 The comments regarding the historical use of the project site for agricultural operations
is consistent with the environmental setting related to hazardous materials as
described in EIR Section 5.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.
City of Carlsbad August 2020 I 0.2-179
0.2 Response to Comments
Final EIR I Marja Acres Project
IND-22.12
IND-22.13
IND-22.14
IND-22.15
IND-22.16
IND-22.17
IND-22.18
IND-22.19
IND-22.20
IND-22.21
IND-22.22
IND-22.23
IND-22.24
IND-22.25
Soils on-site have been sampled and tested for the potential presence of the pesticides
and heavy metals as recommended by DTSC's Interim Guidance for Sampling
Agricultural Properties (2008). Please refer to responses to comments IND-22.3 and
IND-22.8.
Soils samples and testing were conducted on the project site regardless of specific
crop usage; rather, testing was conducted based on commonly recognized hazardous
pesticides pursuant to DTSC's Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties
(2008).
The soil samples collected were tested for Toxaphene. The results indicate that the
samples are below the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Residential Regional
Screening Levels (RSL) and DTSC's Human and Exological Risk Office (HERO)
Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) Note #3.
Please refer to responses to comments IND-22.3 and IND-22.4. No UST records or
visible evidence of USTs were reported in the Phase I ESA report.
Remediation of soils is not required. Please refer to responses to comments IND-22.3
and IND-22.4.
Please refer to response to comment IND-22.3.
Please refer to responses to comments IND-4.1, IND-4.2, and IND-22.6.
Please refer to response to comment IND-22.3.
Please refer to responses to comments IND-4.1 and IND-4.2.
Please refer to response to comment IND-12.4.
Comment noted. The comment does not raise a specific issue regarding the adequacy
of the EIR. Therefore, no further response is necessary.
Comment noted. The comment does not raise a specific issue regarding the adequacy
of the EIR. Therefore, no further response is necessary.
Please refer to response to comment IND-22.3.
Please refer to responses to comments IND-22.3, IND-22.12, and IND-12.4.
0.2-180 I August 2020 City of Carlsbad
September 15, 2020
Members of the Carlsbad Planning Commission:
We have reviewed the Response to Comments (RTCs) in the Final Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the Marja Acres Project. Most of the responses simply reiterate
what we had already reviewed in the Draft EIR. It is disappointing that despite our
comments, which clearly show a lack of characterization at the project site, no additional
characterization is planned. All of our comments still stand, and we continue to believe
the characterization of the project site is woefully inadequate.
One of our major concerns, as outlined in more detail in our May 29, 2019 comment
letter addressed to City Planning staff, was that only 20 soil borings were taken over the
20+ acre project site. Additionally, based on the Property Plan, Figure No. 2 (Final EIR,
Appendix F [see attached]) showing the shallow soil sample locations, and based on
our review of the RTCs, no focused, authoritative samples were taken at the project
site. No soil samples were taken in the known pesticide storage areas or along the drip
lines of pre-1978 buildings and structures, including the family home. It also does not
appear as though soil samples were taken in the known hazardous
substances/chemical storage areas. Without proper characterization, it is impossible to
determine the extent of contamination, and whether or not appropriate mitigation
measures have been identified that would ensure the protection of human health
(construction workers, people living near the project site, and future residents) and the
environment.
Many of the RTCs cite the August 7, 2008 Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision),
hereafter referred to as the DTSC Guidance, regarding the soil sampling methodology
utilized at the project site. The following notes are of particular interest:
• For a 20 acre site, the DTSC Guidance (Table 1: Recommended Number of
Sampling Locations) recommends 30 borings. Again, only 20 soil borings were
taken at the project site.
• On the first page of the DTSC Guidance it states in bold-face type "This guidance
is not intended to diminish the need to take focused, authoritative samples at site
locations commonly associated with hazardous substances releases nor replace
guidance provided by the PEA Guidance Manual. This guidance is not
applicable to areas where pesticides were mixed, stored, disposed, or areas
where pesticides may have accumulated, such as ponds and drainage ditches."
Yet, the Final EIR states that there were " ... multiple out-buildings used for
storage of pesticides and hazardous materials, and a single-family home." There
Page 1 of 6
are also photographs (10 and 11) that show views of the eastern and western
pesticide storage areas. Based on those two photographs, it is highly likely that
pesticide mixing occurred on the project site. Photograph 12 is a view of the
chemical storage at the palm farm and photograph 13 is a view of the hazardous
material storage area for the guitar repair center. (Final EIR, Appendix F, Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment)
• Section 2.2 of the DTSC Guidance also states that it " ... does not apply to former
agricultural property that has been graded for construction or other purposes,
that has received fill, or has had parking lots or structures placed on it following
active use as an agricultural field ... These areas may require biased, discrete
sampling as opposed to the sampling for agricultural properties discussed in this
document."
However, response IND-22.3 states, "It is recognized that portions of the project
site have been farmed. Additionally, the site has been disturbed, and at times
graded or otherwise tilled associated with site improvements, on-going nursery
operations and limited agriculture that has occurred in the southern portion of the
site."
The response is supported, in part, by Figure 5.5-1 of the Final EIR which shows
Building #1 (The Hoffman Residence) having been built in 1951 , with additions in
1961, 1964 and 1977-80. Also, aerial photographs from 1953, 1964, and 1970
showing greenhouses on the project site and by 1979 they appear to be gone
(Final EIR, Appendix F).
Clearly, there are areas on the project site that warrant biased, discrete
sampling, as well as analyses for a broader number of constituents.
Unfortunately, neither occurred at the project site.
• Section 2.6 of the DTSC Guidance states, "In many cases, agricultural properties
may include other areas of concern such as operations yards, storage areas, fuel
tanks, residences, irrigation systems, and animal facilities." It goes on to provide
a list of examples of areas of concern and then states, "Although agricultural-
related, these targeted areas should be considered during the PEA scoping
meeting and investigated using standard PEA protocols."
Section 3.1.3.1 of the DTSC Guidance states, "Focused sampling in
mixing/loading/storage areas, drainage ditches, farm houses, or outbuilding
areas may require analyses for a number of other constituents besides OCPs
and arsenic, including other classes of pesticides/herbicides, paraquat, metals,
and petroleum related compounds ... "
Section 3.2 of the DTSC Guidance states, " ... When the site has been used for
agricultural crop, the presumption is that agricultural chemicals were applied
uniformly across the site in any given year and that the variation across the site
Page 2 of 6
will be relatively small. .. The uniform application assumption does not apply for
non-cultivated areas (e.g. drainage ditches, farm houses and other structures,
mixing/loading areas, storage sheds, etc.)"
The point is, there are known pesticide and hazardous materials/chemical
storage areas, pre-1978 residential buildings, former greenhouses, and quite
possibly other areas that should have been more thoroughly investigated (i.e.,
biased, discrete sampling conducted in those areas), rather than making an
assumption that agricultural chemicals were applied uniformly across the entire
project site in any given year. There should have also been more than 20
sampling locations across the 20+ acre project site, and samples should have
been analyzed for a broader number of constituents.
In our May 29, 2019 comment letter, we requested a table listing all of the
buildings/structures located on the project site, including the dates of construction, the
type (e.g., residential home, pesticide storage, mixing, etc.), and the size. Instead of
providing a table, the response (IND-62.3) we received was "EIR Appendix F provides
the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Shallow Soil Sampling report. This
report provides detailed information regarding the historic uses of the property, and
includes historic aerial photographs, historic topographic maps, and city directories.
These records indicate approximate dates of construction and the uses of various
buildings/occupants of the site." We read the report and that is why we made the
request. All of this information should be provided in one comprehensive table.
Figure 2, Property Plan (Final EIR, Appendix F [see attached]) shows the locations of
the 20 soil borings. It also shows various buildings/structures on the project site (figure
is dated 15/10/09). It is impossible to make out each individual building/structure, and
most are not labeled. In our May 29, 2019 comment letter, we requested a figure(s) that
clearly identifies all buildings/structures, including those that were previously
removed/demolished. We also asked that all of the areas/buildings/structures,
especially storage, mixing/loading, and wash-down areas be properly labeled. A
comprehensive figure showing the soil borings overlaid on the buildings/structures, both
past and present is a must. That, in conjunction with the table mentioned above, would
clearly show areas with possible contamination and whether or not soil borings were
taken in those areas. It would most certainly identify data gaps. Unfortunately,
response IND-62.6 did not even acknowledge our request for this type of figure(s).
Response IND-62.6 states, "The soil sampling methodology generally follows the
Department of Toxic Substances Control -Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural
Fields [sic] to determine the sampling number and depths. Based on the Department of
Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) guidance listed in Section 3.1 where sites are 20+
acres discrete samples should be collected "on 1-acre centers" and Section 3.2 "Each
located [sic] should be sampled to include one surface sample (0-6 inches) and one
subsurface sample (2 to 3 foot range). [Note: 0 inches means first encountered soil.
Thick mats of vegetable material, roots, and other extraneous material should not be
sampled.]"" Response IND-22.6 specifically refers to DTSC's -Interim Guidance for
Page 3 of 6
Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision) dated August 7, 2008. The Third
Revision is the latest guidance on DTSC's website for agricultural properties. We
reviewed Sections 3.1 and 3.2 and those sections do not contain the information as
provided in response IND-62.6. Please explain the discrepancy.
Response IND-22.8 states the following: "According to DTSC's Interim Guidance for
Sampling Agricultural Properties (2008), Section 3.0 Sampling Strategies 'While
paraquat does have a longer half-lrfe [sic], it has either not been detected or detected
rarely at trace levels at sites which DTSC has had oversight, therefore routine analyses
for paraquat is not required for field areas." Interestingly, the response does not include
the last sentence in that paragraph (Section 3.0 Sampling Strategies) which says
"Analyses for paraquat may be required in storage and mixing/loading areas." There
are known storage areas on the project site, and more than likely mixing/loading areas
as well. Why wasn't the highly toxic weed killer (herbicide), paraquat, included in the
analyses? Why weren't soil samples taken in the pesticide storage areas? Again, if
sampling is not conducted in the correct locations, and samples are not analyzed for the
correct constituents, then it is impossible to have an accurate understanding of the
extent of contamination.
Responses IND-62.1 and IND-62.2: The responses do not address our concern
regarding potential lead in soil around the pre-1978 buildings/structures currently or
previously located on the project site. In fact, response IND-62.2 states, "The shallow
soil samples were collected only to assess historical agricultural use throughout the
Property. There was no lead-based paint hazard assessment performed on the
structure [sic] and none of the soil sampling was conducted with any intention of
evaluating the potential lead-based paint hazards associated with the structures. A pre
demolition survey is required prior to removal of any pre-1978 building [sic] or structures
as addressed in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1." Please note that the pre-demolition survey
required prior to removal of any pre-1978 buildings, per Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 , only
addresses lead from lead-based paint (LBP) and asbestos in buildings. It does not
address the potential for lead in soil. Per our original comment, we know that LBP may
be present on buildings and structures that were constructed prior to 1978. This in turn
creates the possibility that, through the action of normal weathering and maintenance,
there may be lead from LBP in the soil surrounding these buildings and structures. The
soil in the driplines of pre-1978 buildings and structures, both existing and previously
demolished, should be sampled and analyzed for lead. Again, if samples are not taken
in locations where contamination is likely present, obtaining an accurate picture of the
extent of contamination is unachievable.
The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Final EIR, Appendix F) concluded there
was "no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the
Property" and that "no further investigation appears to be warranted at this time." This
conclusion is not surprising given the following:
Page4of 6
• Only 20 soil borings were taken over the 20+ acre project site, even though the
DTSC Guidance recommends 30 borings. Please note that the RTCs on the
Final EIR cite the DTSC Guidance in regards to the soil sampling methodology
utilized at the project site.
• No biased, discrete sampling was conducted in areas where contamination
would likely be present.
• No samples were taken in the known pesticide storage areas, and it does not
appear samples were taken in the known hazardous substances/chemical
storage areas.
• No soil samples were taken in the driplines of the pre-1978 buildings and
structures (existing or formerly demolished), where one would expect to find
elevated lead levels from LBP.
• Soil samples were not analyzed for paraquat, a highly toxic weed killer
(herbicide). Given the historical information provided, soil samples should have
been analyzed for a broader number of constituents, including paraquat.
There is a lot of good, historical information in the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (Final EIR, Appendix F) that points to where possible contamination may
be present on the project site, unfortunately, the sampling methodology utilized, largely
did not take that information into account. We strongly believe further investigation is
warranted.
Response IND-22.3 states, "The result of this soils testing indicates that the agricultural
use of the project site does not represent a REC or a human health risk in light of the
contemplated residential use of the project site. Therefore, implementation of the
proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment." Since the project site was not adequately
characterized, we do not believe there is sufficient information to make the
determination that the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials/substances into the
environment. Again, without proper characterization, it is impossible to determine the
extent of contamination, and whether or not appropriate mitigation measures have been
identified that would ensure the protection of human health and the environment.
We appreciate the RTCs on the Draft EIR, and we hope you will consider these
additional comments prior to certifying the EIR or making any final decisions on the
Page 5 of 6
Marja Acres Project. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Jennifer
Rich at or email jmrfunder@gmail.com.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Rich and Greg Funderburk
Park Drive Homeowners
jmrfunder@gmail.com and smoqetr@gmail.com
Attachment
Page 6 of 6
11 ~ n
0 0 :, .,
C a: :, co
~
0
~
'"
GRADED LAND UNDER
DEVELOPMENT
-. ~-
9
NOTE: THIS DRAWING ILLUSTRATES SUPPORTING INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO A STANTEC CONSUL TING LTD. REPORT AND MUST NOT BE USED FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
Cllent:
PROPERTY PLAN
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
4901 EL CAMINO REAL, CARLSBAD, CA
NEW URBAN WEST, INC.
Project No.: 185803532
Scale: AS SHOWN
Date: 15/10/09
Own. By: CD OMtiC2015090004
App'dBy: KE
LEGEND
• SHALLOW SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
250 500FT
SCALE : AS SHOWN
Fig.No.:
2 Qi Stantec
1
Teri Delcamp
Subject:FW: Marja Acres Project
From: Teri Delcamp
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 3:47 PM
To: jmrfunder@gmail.com
Cc: Greg Funderburk <smoqetr@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Marja Acres Project
Good afternoon Jennifer and Greg –
Please see the city’s responses to your comments in the email below organized around the main summary comments in
your bullet points, as well as a last response to the more recent email which is attached:
1. Comment: Only 20 soil borings were taken over the 20+ acre project site, even though the DTSC Interim
Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision) dated August 7, 2008 recommends 30
borings. Please note that the Response to Comments on the Final EIR cite the 2008 DTSC Interim Guidance in
regards to the soil sampling methodology utilized at the project site.
Response: Based on the DTSC Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Fields, Table 1: for 20 acres, 30 soil
borings and only 8 composite samples are the recommended sampling frequency. However, composite
samples are a mixture of multiple areas and are less representative than discrete samples. The DTSC guidance
states that if samples are not composited, then all discrete samples shall be analyzed. Instead of the 8
composite samples recommended, a total of 20 shallow discrete samples were collected on 1‐acre centers at
the site and analyzed. Therefore, 2.5 times more samples were collected and analyzed than recommended by
DTSC guidelines. Also note that 30 soils borings/samples were taken at the site. 20 were shallow and the
other 10 were deep. All 30 samples were sent to the lab. The 20 shallow samples were tested and because
the result indicated levels were below thresholds, there was no need to test the 10 deeper samples.
2. No biased, discrete sampling was conducted in areas where contamination would likely be present.
Response: No signs of stained soil or mixing of pesticides were reported outside the metal storage containers.
Interviews with the palm farm operator reported that only fertilizers and no pesticides were used and stored
in the eastern storage area. Therefore, no biased sampling was recommended. A discrete sample was
performed in the area graded for construction for the parking lot.
3. No samples were taken in the known pesticide storage areas, and it does not appear samples were taken in the
known hazardous substances/chemical storage areas.
Response: The pesticide storage areas presented in photographs in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
report show that the pesticides are stored over properly sized secondary containment and inside metal
storage containers. No sign of stained soil or mixing of pesticides were reported outside the metal storage
containers. Interviews with the palm farm operator reported that only fertilizers and no pesticides were used
and stored in the eastern storage area. No known areas of outside pesticide storage were reported. Therefore,
additional sampling was not recommended based on field observations.
4. No soil samples were taken in the driplines of the pre‐1978 buildings and structures (existing or formerly
demolished), where one would expect to find elevated lead levels from lead‐based paint.
2
Response: Final EIR Mitigation Measure HAZ‐1 requires a lead‐based paint (LBP) survey to be conducted prior
to demolition. If LBP is determined to be present on‐site, it would be on the buildings themselves where paint
was applied (i.e., the walls, woodwork, etc.) as lead does not leach from the paint. Paint chips on the soil
would be reported during the survey. Demolition and removal must comply with applicable regulations for
demolition methods and dust suppression.
5. Soil samples were not analyzed for paraquat, a highly toxic weed killer (herbicide). Given the historical
information provided, soil samples should have been analyzed for a broader number of constituents, including
paraquat.
Response: According to DTSC’s Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (2008), Section 3.0
Sampling Strategies, the only pesticides that require analysis are OCPs, including DDT, toxaphene, and
dieldrin, etc. The section on pesticides goes on to state that “while paraquat does have a longer half‐life [than
most other classes of pesticides], it has either not been detected or detected rarely at trace levels at sites
which DTSC has had oversight, therefore routine analyses for paraquat is not required for field areas.”
6. (Per the recent attached email) There is no Section 1.2 in the Phase I Report. It should have referenced Section
2.3. Also, the reference to ASTM E‐1527‐05 is outdated. It should have referenced ASTM E 1527‐13.
The wrong section was referenced and should have been Section 2.3 where the exceptions and limiting
conditions were noted. Additionally, the report was completed per ASTM E 1527‐13. The ASTM Standard was
referenced correctly through the majority of the report but was missed in one paragraph (Conclusions). These
typographical errors do not impact the findings of the report and do not mean the Phase I ESA was conducted
incorrectly.
City staff’s position is that the site was adequately characterized in the Phase I ESA, the Phase I ESA was supervised and
conducted in accordance with all applicable guidelines and standards by personnel qualified to do so, and the Phase I
ESA was peer‐reviewed by the city’s EIR consultant firm prior to its inclusion in the EIR. Therefore, no revisions to the
CEQA analysis or EIR are required.
Thank you,
Teri
Teri Delcamp
Principal Planner
Community Development Department
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Ave.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
www.carlsbadca.gov
760‐602‐4611 | teri.delcamp@carlsbadca.gov
DURING THE CURRENT PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY:
FOR ONGOING PROJECTS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR PROJECT PLANNER TO SCHEDULE A RESUBMITTAL DROP‐OFF
APPOINTMENT.
(._City of
Carlsbad
1
Teri Delcamp
From:Linda Geldner <linda@geldner.com>
Sent:Monday, October 5, 2020 10:34 PM
To:Teri Delcamp
Cc:Don Neu; Ronald Kemp
Subject:Marja Acres- Public Comments for City Council
Teri- Please include this in the public comments for the Mayor and City Council on Marja Acres. Thanks so much! LG
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, My technical comments sent to staff by e-mail on 9/26/20 and my comments below are made as a private citizen of Carlsbad. While I am a member of the Planning Commission (PC), all comments are my observations and opinions alone. 1. Project review process- This project raises the same process concerns expressed at public meetings by at least 4 other past or current planning commissioners over the years. In my opinion the project approval process for large projects should be improved. The planning department works with an applicant for 2-3 years, sometimes much longer. By design the process does not allow progress briefings to the PC or an official opportunity for public input to the PC along the way.
The PC receives large projects like this cold with 4 days to review hundreds of pages (roughly 700 pages in this case) and understand the project well enough to make an informed decision. Other cities have more collaborative processes, which I believe would benefit Carlsbad, it’s citizens and project applicants. City Council input relative to this process would be
greatly appreciated. 2. Density and follow-on planning- New State of California housing and density bonus laws force cities to allow higher
densities in different locations than originally planned. As these infill sites are approved, I believe it is important to engage the community in follow-on planning without delay to ensure we successfully incorporate the higher density. Community development is an ongoing, iterative process; the Deming cycle/circle of continuous improvement called
PDCA (plan, do, check, act/adjust) is a useful tool. For example the city may need to identify additional facilities, facility improvements, long-term road improvements, etc. to support the new density. I believe there should be an after action process for each density bonus project to ensure we adjust if needed. 3. El Camino Real (ECR) road planning- It is imperative that we keep traffic moving to the best of our ability along ECR. The south bound only access and egress to this project, while not an optimal solution, is the best we can do at this time. However, I believe there may be some mid to long-term road projects that could improve the situation and should be explored, both here and along ECR. These might include a U-turn only lane paired with a left turn lane, off-ramps, grade
separations, frontage roads, roundabouts, etc. Let’s put some creative heads together. If we start planning now, construction would be 10 to 20 years down the road at best and I expect we will need the improvements by then.
4. Transit planning- It's not clear to me that subsidized Transit passes will mitigate traffic on ECR. Since mitigation options are limited it is worth a try, but without additional actions by the City and/or NCTD I think it is a longshot. The only way I can see to improve bus ridership on ECR is smaller buses running more frequently with dedicated bus lanes (at
least during traffic hour) and added express routes. Mini Transit stations could also be planned near the density, but should only be built when/if ridership increases. We need to understand that this strategy might not work. Ridership is a data driven way to evaluate effectiveness before we pour tons of money into it (the PDCA process). This also makes the
road planning discussed in item #3 even more important for this and any future high density housing. I request these comments also be provided to the Planning Commission and the Housing Element Advisory Committee
(HEAC). I believe they may find them useful as they evaluate proposed housing sites. Thank you for your consideration and the opportunity to comment. Kind Regards,
2
Linda Geldner
linda geldner, r.a. / principal
web: www.geldner.com
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
~) geldner group
1
Teri Delcamp
Subject:FW: MARJA ACRES - COMMENTS
From: DAVID CARLTON <david.carlton@sbcglobal.net>
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 11:19 AM
To: Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: MARJA ACRES ‐ COMMENTS
After reviewing the plans for Marja Acres received from a nearby homeowner, here are my thoughts: 1. Regarding the design; the plans look more like an RV, Boat, and Storage complex than a housing project; or perhaps a Govt. sponsored homeless shelter in some future dystopian society. The
housing density and layout looks ridiculous with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. I can't imagine anyone choosing to live there unless the rent is dirt cheap. 2. Regarding additional spill over parking on Kelly Drive; I often park in front of my own house on Kelly Drive now just to keep other people from parking there. If I don't park in front of my house,
someone else will. I prefer to keep the street clear but it's impossible. With that said, I do not want any more parking restrictions on Kelly Drive. The houses are too close to the street and driveway parking is already too limited. Plus we have too many codes and restrictions already. 3. Regarding the El Camino Intersection; how many accidents have we already had at the
intersection of Kelly and El Camino Real? I've seen the emergency vehicles associated with several accidents at the intersection. Someone needs to check the stats. 3. Regarding the traffic on Kelly; we're considering putting up a block wall and gate (to code of course) in the front of our house now (and take an urban approach). It's already the Kelly freeway
and it's noisy. There was a two car accident in front of our house last week; it was bad enough that both vehicles had to be towed. And this is a street with a school. 4. Regarding our natural resources and wildlife; my wife has cataloged and photographed over 59 bird species in our area including the ** endangered California Gnatcatcher ** which is limited to
coastal sage scrub. Additional habitat will be destroyed. The bird list as well as photographs are available upon request. David Carlton
Carlsbad, CA. 92008
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
safe.
From:Don Neu
To:Melissa Flores
Subject:FW: Marja Acres
Date:Monday, October 26, 2020 1:30:13 PM
Hi Melissa,
Emails for the Marja Acres project have been submitted recently and there will probably be more
that are sent in. Are you able to add them as attachments to the staff report to the City Council?
Below is one of the emails. I have another that Jennifer forwarded to me.
Don
From: Enchanted Seashells <enchantedseashells@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 11:01 AM
To: Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: RE: Marja Acres
Marja Acres is located in the NW quadrant in the City of Carlsbad. It's also located in the Coastal
Zone with the property that lies along El Camino Real between Kelly Drive and Lisa St. across El
Camino Real from Robertson Ranch, another atrocity.
Concerns are that the State Density Bonus plan submitted has only 46 affordable units but the
original plan using the Carlsbad Ordinance had 50 affordable units. We are getting a higher density
on the project now with fewer affordable units.
Concerns are that this new development will bring in +/- 600 cars to the area where Robertson
Ranch is still building homes and apartments. Impacts to El Camino Real will be significant.
Concerns are that the project will be accessed only from Southbound El Camino Real. This means
that all vehicles coming from the south on northbound El Camino Real will have to make a U-Turn at
Kelly x El Camino Real. Nothing in the Traffic Report included a double U-turn lane which, will
undoubtedly back up the turn lane onto the north bound El Camino Real fast lane. This intersection
is already a safety issue and will be even more dangerous due to the high volume of vehicles
expected to use that turn lane. The expected number of vehicles for Marja Acres (248 townhomes (2
car garage) = 496 cars. Street parking will have approximately 116 spaces and the commercial
parking will have 60. The senior apartments will have 47 parking spots. This means that ~720
vehicles or more will be accessing this intersection JUST FROM THE NEW Development project at
Marja Acres. This does not include traffic from other nearby areas that wish to access Kelly Drive
during school hours, to drop and pick up their children. THIS HAS ALWAYS BEEN A PUBLIC SAFETY
HAZARD.
Concerns are that this project has too high a density.
Concerns are that there is not enough parking: each townhome will get a two car garage (with no
driveway parking) and less than 0.5 guest parking spots (for family and guests).
Concerns are that there are no guest parking lots in the plan. All parking (not in the garages, must be
on the street). So, out of 246 units with two car garages, additional family cars, boats, and guests
must compete for the 116 parking spots on the street.
In my opinion, this is another poorly thought out and unnecessary development in Carlsbad, and I've
seen a lot of them in my 36 years of living here.
Rosanne Bentley
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
From:Don Neu
To:Melissa Flores
Subject:FW: turn lane and light at ECR and Kelly Drive
Date:Monday, October 26, 2020 2:49:54 PM
An email for the Marja Acres staff report.
From: Candy Chestnut <ckchesnut@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2020 8:03 PM
To: Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: turn lane and light at ECR and Kelly Drive
This turn lane from ECR to Kelly Drive is not long enough and extremely dangerous. The light system cannot handle this and it will definitely not be able to handle the 600+ cars aday from the Marja Acres disaster that is going in. Please consider making the builders pay forthe lane extension. I truly believe it will save lives in the long run. There is already a big backup to turn onto Kelly Dr when school is in session. Thank you,
Candy Chesnut
District 1 Resident
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
August 10, 2020
Mayor Matt Hall & the Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall & members of the City Council,
Please approve Marja Acres! It's the perfect project for Carlsbad. The design fits into
our community, it's located along a transit corridor, and it supports a multigenerational
neighborhood that our region desperately needs. Plus, the homes will be reasonably
sized and priced.
I work at a senior care facility here in Carlsbad and I see every day how
intergenerational care and support helps our seniors age with grace and happiness. The
low income senior units that are a part of Marja Acres are so needed. Not everyone can
afford assisted living, but every senior does deserve the dignity of a quality roof over
their head.
Marja has numerous other benefits including being located along a transit corridor so
residents of all ages can be less reliant on cars and more on bikes, buses, and maybe
even autonomous cars some day.
Marja Acres is just what Carlsbad needs. It's respectful and cool design fits our
community and it's not overly burdensome like some others. Please approve Marja
Acres so our community can continue to grow and succeed.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Madeline Gagliani
Carlsbad CA 92008
Scanned with CamScanner
Augusil 4, 2020
The Honorable Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
l 200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and distinguished members of the City Council,
My name is Andy and I am writing you today in full support of the Marja Acres project. As a
Marirn! who intends to return to Carlsbad after my upcoming deployment to Japan, I hope to
come back to a city that I now call home and be able to buy a house and retire here.
I've come to love Carlsbad and can't wait to come back. Having traveled the world with the
Marine Corps, 1 know how unique and wonderful this community is and Marja Acres would be
an awesome addition.
It's an infill development along transit lines with access to parks, open space, and amenitiies. It
has a neighborhood feel as well as benefits for the entire community. It adds to our much needed
housing stock but not in an offensive, maximize every-square inch of land kind of way.
I hope you approve Marja Acres. Thank you in :advance for your consideration.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Scanned with CamScanner
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Councll
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and City Council,
I am writing today in FULL SUPPORT of Marja Acres. I believe that the best way to solve our
highway congestion and climate change goals Is to cluster housing in neighborhoods that
already exist. We cannot Single Family Home our way out of this housing crisis and the
detrimental effects of cars sitting on the freeway all day because everyone has long commutes.
People need to work where they llve. It's a quality of life Issue, too. Sadly, accessible and
affordable housing is no longer a luxury. San Diego County only has two fortune 500 companies
and they both talk regularly about how hard It is to attract talent because there Is no housing
available for their potential employees.
Are we really going to kill our local economy and send our local talent away because we're
afraid to build some townhomes?
Marja Acres is a good project. They've done everythi.ng right. They've engaged with the
residents, the school district, and have made concessions. It's a win win. Please approve this
project!
Thank you,
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and Carlsbad City Council,
Please accept this letter in support of Marja Acres by New Urban West (NUWI). I am a Carlsbad
resident who believes in quality infill housing that Is attainable and responsibly permitted and
constructed.
New Urban West was selected from a crowded field of developers to develop the Marja Acres
site because they have a track record of working with the community not against It. Over the
past two years, NUWI has made several concessions to the surrounding neighborhood. I think
it's Important that you are aware of those concessions because they only came to be after
many many meetings and conversations between NUWI and the community. The top
concessions In my mind are:
1. Intergenerational housing, including 46 affordable senior units
2. Added guest parking that exceeds City's requirement
3. The inclusion of a solid masonry wall on the southern property line to minimize
noise.
4. Removal of rooftop decks closest to neighbors.
5. Walkable retall shops that focus on local artisans, not natlonal chains
6. Free transit passes for residents
These are Just the highlights. There are other improvements and concessions around
community character and other issues. Marja Acres is a good project. They've done everything
right and they've listened to the community.
I urge you to approve this project I
Sincerely,
Mayor Matt Hall and carlsbad City Council
City of carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and City Council,
I am writing today in FULL SUPPORT of Marja Acres. I believe that the best way to solve our
· highway congestion and climate change goals is to duster housing in neighborhoods that
already exist. We cannot Slngle Family Home our way out of this housing crisis and the
detrimental effects of cars sitting on the freeway all day because everyone has long commutes.
People need to work where they live. It's a quality of life issue, too. Sadly, accessible and
affordable housing is no longer a luxury. San Diego County only has two fortune 500 companies
and they both talk regularly about how hard It Is to attract talent because there Is no housing
available for their potential employees.
Are we really going to kill our local economy and send our local talent away because we're
afraid to build some townhomes?
Marja Acres Is a good project. They've done everything right. They've engaged with the
residents, the school district, and have made concessions. It's a win win. Please approve this
project I
Thank you,
Sincerely, ,,.,---:,)
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of cartsbad
1200 Carlsbad VIiiage Dr
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and Carlsbad City Council,
Please accept this letter tn support of Marja Aaes by New Urban West (NUWI). I am a Carlsbad
resident who believes ln quality Infill housing that ls attainable and responsibly permitted and
constructed.
New Urban West was selected from a crowded field of developers to develop the Marja Acres
site because they have a track record of worklns with the community not against it. Over the
past two years, NUWI has made several concessions to the surrounding neighborhood. I think
It's Important that you are aware of those concessions because they only came to be after
many many meettnas and conversations between NUWI and the community. The top
concessions In my mind are:
1. Intergenerational housing, lncludlns 46 affordable senior units
2. Added 1uest parktn1 that exceeds City's requirement
3. The Inclusion of a solld masonry waH on the southern property llne to minimize
noise.
4. Removal of rooftop decks closest to neighbors.
s. Walkable retail shops that focus on local artisans, not national chains
6. Free transit passes for residents
These are Just the hlghllpts. There are other Improvements and concessions around
community character and other Issues. Marja Aaes Is a aood project. They've done everythlns
right and they've listened to the community.
I urge you to approve this projectl
Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad VIiiage Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and Carlsbad City Council,
I am writing to pledge my support for Marja Acres, a proposed mixed-use community In the City
of carlsbad. New Urban West, the developer has kept the essence of our community's
character In mind and has designed a project to complement it.
I am a proud lifelong resident of Carlsbad, very active in the community and I continue to be an
advocate for better environmental sta,-dards. I have loved what I have learned about this
project and how sustainable it will bel They are committed to reducing their carbon footprint.
The design equips 1009' of the homes with solar, includes EV charging stations in every garage
and placed throughout the commercial parking. Addltlonally, this project will utlllze water and
energy conseNatlon methods such as: native and draught tolerant landscaping, recycled water,
efficient appliances and low flow fixtures and the bulldlngs are planned to exceed state energy
efficiency standards by 15%. Lastly, they have offered to provide altematlve options for
transportation by giving free transit passes to their residents to help the Crty meet their climate
goals.
It is In our city's best Interest to prioritize projects that create sustainable solutions to protect
our environment and provide affordable homes for seniors. Please Join me in support of Marja
Acresl
Sincerely, ( .,,. L _ ~ ,=(' \.,(#€ i\,r=c--~
,
/ ,,
Lynnell Talone Honda
DRE#01367023, Berkshire Hathaway HomeServlces California Propetles
Board Member of Aqua Hedlondo La'°on Foundation
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad,~ 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and City Council,
I am writing today in FULL SUPPORT of Marja Acres. I believe that the best way to solve our
highway congestion and climate change goals is to duster housing in neighborhoods that
already exist. We cannot Single Family Home our way out of this housing crisis and the
detrimental effects of cars sitting on the freeway all day because everyone has long commutes.
People need to work where they live. It's a quality of life Issue, too. Sadly, accessible and
affordable housing is no longer a luxury. San Diego County only has two fortune 500 companies
and they both talk regularly about how hard it is to attract talent because there is no housing
available for their potential employees.
Are we really going to kill our local economy and send our local talent away because we're
afraid to bulld some townhomes?
Marja Acres Is a good project. They've done everythi_ng right. They've engaged with the
residents, the school district, and have made concessions. It's a win win. Please approve this
project]
August 12, 2020
Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr,
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and City Council,
As a member of the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors I would like to express
my support for Marja Acres, a proposed mixed-use development project by New Urban West.
This mixed-use community is designed to meet the needs of our work force and our vulnerable
aging population by providing attainable market-rate townhomes and affordable senior housing.
Designed with intergeneration living in mind this community will also feature an urban farm, a
commercial core and it is conveniently located close to a major business park. With our growing
workforce it is essential to ensure they have somewhere to live. Not only is the project located
near many employment hubs it is also offering free transit passes for their residents to have less
reliance on our vehicles.
Please join me in support of Marja Acres.
Si cerely,
, . V//111/)u._ 7J1o£n ~
atherine Magana
Managing Partner
WWM Financial
'Mayor 'Matt '}-{a(( and City Counci(
City of Carfs6ad
1200 Carfs6adVi((age 'Dr.
Carfs6ad, C?l 92008
'Dear 'Mayor ')-{a((&' City Counci(,
Today '1 write to you to suyyort 'Marya ?lcres. '1 Jee( (ife we've Geen ta(fing a6out tfiis yroject
for far too Cong andnot doing anything to advance it. 'Marja ?lcres is the_perject yroject for
Carfs6ad. The aesthetic fits into our community in a tastefu( and a_pyrO]'riate way. 'The sca(e
of the entire yroject is yerject. ?lnd the entire yroject yromotes a sustaina6Ce inc(usive (ifestyCe
where senior citizens and famiCies can Uve and thrive in the same syace.
'My fami(y has wanted to own a home in our community of Carfs6ad for some time. 'Rents are
near(y as high as mortgages, 6ut the housing suyy(y is sma(( and yrices fe~p going iq,. 'Marja
?lcres isn't a yroject of mansions. 'Rather a yroject of right sized homes that fit a variety of
6ud'gets. ?lnd it inc(udes ajforda6Ce housing for seniors. 'This is so needed as our community
ages.
?lnyways, '1 hO]'e you suyyort 'Marja ?lcres (if.e '1 do 6ecause it r~resents a rea( O]'}'Ortunity
for my fami(y to own a home in the community we ca(( home.
'Thanf you.
Sincere(y,
/J,i(IA-I{,
'1fifoCette 'Menio£/
Carfs6ad, C?l
Scanned with CamScanner
Pfannloa Commission
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: SUPPORT FOR MARJA ACRES
Dear Planning Commissioners:
North County needs more senior housing: I know that bett th er an anyone.
After I served in the US Army during the Vietnam War I
where I was able to live Inexpensively for almost a d~rr;v::, abroad. I found a quiet town In Portugal
plans to move back home to the states Contributi approached retirement age, I made · ng my navigation · active reserves. I made my home In Mexico _ on a boat ju expenence, 1 Joined the Coast Guard
was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer I received my med·st al ctrross the border. This worited well untll 1
• 1ca eatments throuah the VA which
required me to travel across the border frequently But as I grew weak fro the •
I • m treatments, I could no anger physlcalfy tolerate the border wait times. I needed to move closer to the tr tme
I ft M · fo th US ea nt center, so 1 e ex,co r e .
I am thankful for my military benefits. The VA provided -and still provides-for my medical care, but
the VA does not provide for emergency housing. I had a difficult time finding a place to live close to the
treatment center. I could not find anything in my price range-not even a room in a house. Finally, 1
moved in with a friend, but after some time that situation fell apart and I was back at square one. In a
last-ditch effort, I used my base privileges to look for a roommate among the many young Marines that
often are looking for any way to move off base -but nothing. I exhausted every avenue and my efforts
remained fruitless. I was growing anxious because I knew I was only days away from becoming
homeless. I made a final call to an affordable complex I had seen on my travels to the treatment center.
That call was my life preserver. My situation Immediately changed. One unit had Just become available.
Today, I am housed, safe and my medical care continues to be provided by the VA. But my story Is not
unique -like everyone, my expenses continue to gradually dimb. Uke everyone, at times we find
ourselves in situations that we were not prepared for. At times, we just need someone to throw us a
rope.
Please vote for more affordable senior units. Every affordable unit counts. Ptease vote YES on the Marta
Acres project!
Sincerely,
Kall Randall
Oceanside, CA 92058
Subject: Marja Acres - To be read aloud at Planning Commission Meeting
Dear Planning Commissioners:
I live in Loma Lagnua, the neighborhood adjacent to Marja Acres' southern border. Since
the Spring of 2017, my neighbors and I have worked with Jonathan Frankel of New Urban
West (NUW) to address and mitigate our privacy concerns. We held numerous
neighborhood gatherings with Jonathan. In response to the concerns my neighbors and I
expressed, NUW agreed to:
Remove the pedestrian connection that was originally proposed between
Marja Acres and Park Drive
Eliminate the first and second rows of rooftop decks nearest our Park Drive
neighbors
Build a solid 6ft split faced masonry wall (rather than a wooden fence) to
buffer noise and light pollution
eliminate the optional roll-up/carport options on townhouses to insure the
two car garage was available for parking
eliminate optional kitchenettes from ground floor plans to discourage rentals
lower the grading along our shared border to reduce/minimize the visual
impact of the townhouses
incorporate neighbors preferences regarding landscaping along our shared
border.
NUW made, and continues to make, a good faith effort to address our privacy concerns.
My personal goal in helping facilitate the neighborhood interactions with NUW was to
create a win-win. As long as the above agreements are kept, I support the project.
Although some of us still have concerns about the number of housing units and the traffic
impacts on the El Camino Real...we would prefer numbers closer to the 233 units originally
proposed, instead of 296...that is something the City Planning Commission and Council
members must decide for our community. Lastly, I would like to ask that the City prohibit
short term rentals in Marja Acres, as well as first story rental units in the townhouses
(due to limited parking and noise concerns). Perhaps these last two requests should be
addressed in the CC&R's.
Sincerely,
Tracy Seemann
Tracy Seemann
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Email sent in directly from sender
September 9, 2020
City of Carlsbad
Planning Commission
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Via Email
Planning Commissioners:
I write to express my support for the Marja Acres project.
As a former Planning Commissioner and member of the City Council, I participated in the robust
multi-year planning process that led to the adoption of the new General Plan in 2015.
The General Plan identified properties that were underutilized and well suited for residential
development, including the Marja Acres site. These properties were identified because of their
proximity to jobs, infrastructure, and other services that made residential uses desirable.
Marja Acres serves to thoughtfully implement the vision of the General Plan with high-quality
design, desirable commercial and retail amenities, new park space, and critical on-site affordable
housing.
The project supports our local employers by providing housing opportunities for young families
and working professionals. Options for intergenerational living, long desired by the City, are
achieved through the provision of deed-restricted affordable housing for seniors. The
neighborhood serving restaurant and retail space facilitates a walkable community while
minimizing car trips and supporting the daily needs of residents.
The project smartly locates housing immediately adjacent to a major transportation corridor – El
Camino Real – and is within three miles of over 30,000 high-quality jobs on Palomar Airport
Road and Faraday Avenue business parks.
Importantly, the design of the project was informed by existing residents who were able to work
collaboratively with the applicant to address concerns related to views, parking, and noise. In
fact, the applicant spent significant additional time designing the project to ensure that no new
home will impair the privacy of existing neighbors.
I firmly believe that the proposed project will be a great fit for Carlsbad and is worthy of your
support.
Sincerely,
Michael Schumacher
Email sent in directly from sender
EASY LIFE MANAGEMENT
Kachel T. lvanovich, E_nrolled Agent
September 4, 2020
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and City Council,
I am writing today in FULL SUPPORT of Marja Acres. I believe that the best way to solve our
highway congestion and climate change goals is to cluster housing in neighborhoods that
already exist. We cannot Single Family Home our way out of this housing crisis and the
detrimental effects of cars sitting on the freeway all day because everyone has long commutes.
People need to work where they live. It's a quality of life issue, too. Sadly, accessible and
affordable housing is no longer a luxury. San Diego County only has two fortune 500 companies
and they both talk regularly about how hard it is to attract talent because there is no housing
available for their potential employees.
Are we really going to kill our local economy and send our local talent away because we're
afraid to build some townhomes?
Marja Acres is a good project. They've done everything right. They've engaged with the
residents, the school district, and have made concessions. It's a win win. Please approve this
project!
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
Qtyoftartsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and City Council,
I am writing today in FULL SUPPORT of Marja Acres. I believe that the best way to solve our
highway conpstlon and dimate change goals Is to duster housing In neighborhoods that
already exist. We cannot Single Family Home our way out of this housing crisis and the
detrimental effects of cars sitting on the freeway all day because everyone has long commutes.
People need to work where they llve. It's a quality of life Issue, too. Sadly, accessible and
affordable housing is no longer a luxury. San Diego County only has two fortune 500 companies
and they both talk regularly about how hard it Is to attract talent because there is no housing
available for their potential emplayees.
Are we really going to kill our local economy and send our local talent away because we're
afraid to build some townhomes?
Marja Acres is a good project. They've done everythlns right. They've en1a1ed with the
residents, the school district, and have made concessions. It's a win win. Please approve this
project!
Thank you,
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and City Council,
I am writing today in FULL SUPPORT of Marja Acres. I believe that the best way to solve our
highway congestion and climate change goals Is to cklster housing In neighborhoods that
already exist. We cannot Single Family Home our way out of this housing crisis and the
detrlmental effects of cars sitting on the freeway all day because everyone has long commutes.
People need to work where they live. It's a quality of life Issue, too. Sadly, accessible and
affordable housing Is no longer a luxury. San Diego County only has two fortune 500 companies
and they both talk regularly about how hard It is to attract talent because there is no housing
available for their potential employees.
Are we really going to kill our local economy and send our local talent away because we're
afraid to build some townhomes?
Marja Acres is a good project. They've done everything right. They've engaged with the
residents, the school district, and have made concessions. It's a win win. Please approve this
project·!
Thank you,
The Foundation for Senior Wellbeing 131 Richmar Ave., San Marcos CA 92069
Our office is generously hosted in the Panorama Teen & Family Resource Center
Office hours: Monday through Friday, 9 am – 1 pm
Mailing address: PO Box 1896, San Marcos CA 92079
844-654-INFO www.thefoundationforseniorwellbeing.org
A 501(c)3 organization: tax ID #95-3622887
Our Mission
The Foundation is dedicated to
improving the wellbeing of a
growing population of seniors
throughout North San Diego
County by linking them, their
families, and their caregivers to
resources and programs.
The five elements of senior
wellbeing:
A sense of purpose
Supportive relationships
Financial security
Community pride
Good physical health
Our vision
That all seniors in North San
Diego County achieve personal
wellbeing so they may thrive!
September 14, 2020
Planning Commission - City of Carlsbad
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Letter of SUPPORT for Marja Acres for September 16 Planning
Commission Meeting and Public Hearing
Dear Planning Commission Chair Anderson and Commissioners:
Last year we learned about Marja Acres, a proposed mixed-use development that
includes workforce housing, affordable senior housing, retail and open space in
Carlsbad, located at 4901 El Camino Real. We are writing to express our support for
this project which provides much needed housing units, walkable space, and
incorporates sustainable design practices and alternate modes of transportation.
For us at the Foundation for Senior Wellbeing, the most important component of
this project is the addition of 46-units of affordable senior housing. The
Foundation for Senior Wellbeing is a resource to seniors searching for services and
affordable housing options in North County. During these encounters we know first-
hand the dire need for affordable housing options for this vulnerable population.
Please vote to support Marja Acres.
Respectfully,
Sarah Benson
Executive Director
The Foundation for Senior Wellbeing
THE FOUNDATION FOR
SENIOR
WELLBEING
The mission of LifeSTEPS is to provide effective educational and supportive services to
maximize the strengths of individuals and build resilient communities.
3247 Ramos Circle, Sacramento, CA 95827
Phone: 916.965.0110 Fax: 916.965.0102 www.lifestepsusa.org
Empowerment. Impact. Community. One STEP at a time.
Life Skills Training & Educational Programs
September 9, 2020
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Letter of SUPPORT for Senior Housing
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Marja Acres is a proposed mixed-use development that will bring workforce housing, affordable senior
housing, retail and open space to the Carlsbad community. In addition to transforming private land into a
senior-friendly, walkable gathering space, the project incorporates sustainable design practices and
alternate modes of transportation including bike paths and walkways.
We at LifeSTEPS know the struggles that aging Americans on limited incomes face each day – and the
stress that can impact the health and well-being of our parents, grandparents, and neighbors. Marja Acres
is a great opportunity for Carlsbad to provide for much-needed affordable senior housing in a healthy
environment, which includes the peace of mind of a safe, secure home in which to thrive.
LifeSTEPS is a statewide social and supportive services organization serving more than 100,000 residents
living in over 350 affordable housing communities in addition to project base and scattered site
supportive services to homeless individuals and families. LifeSTEPS and USA Properties Fund have
partnered together since 1996. USA Properties is one of the largest developers of senior affordable
housing in the United States, and has been an outstanding partner of LifeSTEPS to help seniors continue
to thrive in place.
Your vote of support will secure additional senior housing units for this very vulnerable population.
Respectfully,
Executive Director, LifeSTEPS
September 1, 2020
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and Carlsbad City Council,
I am writing to you today in support of Marja Acres, a mixed-use project proposed by New
Urban West in the City of Carlsbad. Our region and our city continue to face housing challenges.
People want to work where they live, and we often hear business leaders describing the
difficulties they face attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of housing opportunities
in our region. This project is designed in a way that makes new, modern townhomes attainable.
As a longtime local resident and a retired Carlsbad Fire Battalion Chief, I understand the
difficulty in finding workforce housing in our City. This project is designed in a way that makes
new, modern townhomes attainable. The addition of 248 townhomes and 46 affordable senior
apartments will create an intergenerational community for residents. The thoughtful farmhouse
design, planned community areas, urban farm and amenities will be an economic boon for
Carlsbad, especially located at an infill location that could use a bit of revitalization.
Marja Acres would be a welcomed asset to our City, please join me in support.
Carlsbad, CA 92010
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and distinguished members of the City Council,
As a long-time resident of Carlsbad and a full-time working mother I am writing today in full
support of the Marja Acres project. Throughout my career, my position has evolved into gaining
expertise in analyzing market conditions, designing and planning for new communities
throughout the state and working with residents. There continues to be a loud resistance to
housing, and people seem to be afraid of their communities changing, even when it is for the
better. As leaders in the City of Carlsbad they look to you to lead by example. Marja Acres will
help the city plan for our future in a thoughtful way, ensuring our community character stays
intact and people have a chance to create a home in Carlsbad.
This project location will breathe new life into a neglected location -offering vitality, economic
development and a sense of place. Located as an infill development along transit lines with
access to parks, open space, an urban farm and amenities. It has a neighborhood feel as well as
appropriate benefits for the entire community and the team has shown a willingness to work with
the larger community on design, scale, and other features.
I would love to feel confident my own children will have an opportunity to live in Carlsbad in
the future. Marja Acres is the right project at the right time for our awesome City. Please join me
in support.
Sincerely,
Carlsbad, CA 92009
SAN DIEGO NORTH
Economic Development Council
August 27, 2020
Chairman Anderson and Members of the Carlsbad Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Support for Marja Acres
Dear Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers:
On behalf of the San Diego North Economic Development Council (SDNEDC), I would like to express our
support for the Marja Acres project. The SDNEDC's core mission is to improve the prosperity for the citizens
of North County. We are confident that this project meets critical needs that will help our region realize that
objective and improve their quality of life.
By approving the project the City of Carlsbad bas an opportunity to make a positive impact by tackling the
ever-growing housing shortage and start an effort to reduce commutes. Between 2013 and 2019 the five
"Innovate 78" cities added, according to Economic Modeling Specialist Inc., 39,000 net new jobs (both
payroll and non-W2 workers). Over the same period of time, these five cities added just 9,140 new housing
units according to figures from the California Department of Finance
That ratio, of more than four net new workers on the corridor chasing every-one net new home, is not
sustainable. It has had predictable results, leading to rising home prices, rents, and continuing to place
burdensome stress on families while straining our local economy. According to CAL TRANS, counts between
2013 and 2017 (the last year of data) the number of commuters crossing the San Diego/Riverside line
increased by more than 9%. Housing not built in North County just means that the workers are displaced to
Southern Riverside County, taking with them their tax dollars while still congesting our freeways and
contributing even more to GHG emissions.
T he Marja Acres project addresses this deficit by adding 248 townhomes, 46 affordable senior units for low,
very low and extremely low incomes at the site, and offering free transit and mobility passes all located within
the city's major job centers. Its proximity to Palomar Airport Road and the kind of homes being built are
P RECISELY what we need. Within a three-mile radi'us there are over 64,000 jobs. No1th County has a
significant jobs-housing imbalance.
For these reasons we believe Marja Acres deserves your enthusiastic support as a critical addition to the City
of Carlsbad. I am happy to answer any questions you may have about the data in this letter and our analysis of
the underlying economics of the proposed project.
~y,
~. Erik Bruvold
Chief Executive Officer
San Diego North Economic Development Council
100 East San M arcos Blvd., Suite 400 I San Marcos, CA 92069 I 760-510-5919 I www.sdnedc.org
Circulate San Diego
1111 6th Avenue, Suite 402
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: 619-544-9255
Fax: 619-531-9255
www.circulatesd.org
Creating excellent mobility choices and vibrant, healthy communities.
August 17, 2020
Jonathan Frankel
New Urban West Inc
16935 West Bernardo Dr Ste 260
San Diego, CA 92127
Subject: Circulate Mobility Certification for Marja Acres by New Urban West Inc.
Dear Mr. Frankel,
The Circulate Mobility Certification review committee is pleased to award our certification for
the proposed Marja Acres project by New Urban West Inc, which meets the Certification criteria
for sustainable transit-oriented projects in the San Diego region.
Marja Acres will bring 248 townhomes and 46 deed-restricted affordable homes for seniors to an
infill site on El Camino Real. The project site is connected to the major employment centers in
Carlsbad and the Carlsbad Village Coaster station via the route 309 bus, which has a bus stop
immediately adjacent to the project site, and 10 miles of Class II bike lanes along El Camino Real.
The project site is surrounded by residential development, avoids any impacts to protected
habitat and open space, and has been identified as a site suitable for workforce and affordable
housing in previous housing element cycles.
The project implements many smart growth techniques, maximizing walkability through
including on-site retail, a restaurant, an urban farm, park space, and housing. The project includes
dedicated bike storage in both the residential and commercial components and creates activated
pedestrian paseos to conveniently access residential units by foot. Sidewalks are provided on
both sides of the primary loop road, including ADA-accessible routes between park spaces, retail,
the restaurant, and housing units. Vehicular access to all residential units is taken from an alley,
ensuring that pedestrian paseos and the townhomes’ front porches are free from conflicts with
cars.
Marja Acres proposes three-story structures and will grade the site to lower the property in order
to minimize impacts to existing sing-family homes surrounding the project site. The project will
include over 1.2 acres of publicly accessible park space including pocket parks, a dog park, and a
Mobility
CIRCULATE
CERTIFICATION
Creating excellent mobility choices and vibrant, healthy communities.
2
village green. In addition, the retail space and urban farm will provide benefits for the
surrounding community.
After careful review by the review committee of independent local experts in land use and
transportation, Marja Acres earned the Circulate Mobility Certification.
Sincerely,
Colin Parent
Executive Director and General Counsel
The Circulate Mobility Certification, formed in 2012 as the MOVE Alliance and relaunched as the
Circulate Mobility Certification in 2018, provides certification for transit-oriented, smart growth projects
in the San Diego region. The Circulate Mobility Certification Committee members consist of local experts
in smart growth planning and sustainable transit oriented development disciplines, including planners,
developers, urban designers, and transportation engineers. By recognizing and supporting projects which
meet the Circulate Mobility Certification criteria, we can help to create complete communities, one
project at a time. For more information, go to http://www.circulatesd.org/certified.
~~
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr
Carlsbad, CA 92008
SUBJECT: SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Dear Mayor Matt Hall and City Council,
I am writing today in.support of Marja Acres. As a homeowner, I feel lucky to have had
that opportunity to buy when I did. I will say however, that is not a benefit I :see for so
many friends and family members. The town homes, retail and senior units are so
badly needed in our community and Marja Acres has done a great job to not only
preserve some of our natural character but make the homes attainable, affordable
and intergenerational.
Marja Acres is a beautifully designed community and I hope you join me in support
so other people can be able to achieve home ownership as well.
Thank you,
Alyssa Hagemann
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and Carlsbad City Council,
I am writing to pledge my support for Marja Acres, a proposed mixed-use community in the City
of Carlsbad. This project is forward-thinking and well designed to protect and enhance our
community's character.
Marja Acres is committed to reducing their carbon footprint. 100% of the homes will be
equipped with solar, EV charging stations will be in every garage and placed throughout the
commercial parking, and this project will utilize water and energy conservation methods such
as: native and draught tolerant landscaping, recycled water, efficient appliances and low flow
fixtures. The buildings are planned to exceed state energy efficiency standards by 15%!
It is in our city's best interest to prioritize projects that create sustainable solutions toi protect
our environment. Please join me in support of Marja Acres!
Sincerely,
~12.-.
Jacob Driver
Carlsbad Resident
August 15, 2020
Teri Delcamp
Carlsbad Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Ms. Delcamp,
I'm again writing to you today in support of Marja Acres. My daughter and her family live in
Carlsbad and I would very much like to move back to be closer to my daughter and my grand
children.
Unfortunately, as a senior living on a fixed income, I have chosen to live in Tijuana so that I
don't have to choose between the necessities of food, rent, medications, and the like. So while
I am happy in Tijuana, I would love to move back to Carlsbad to be near my family. It is still my
understanding that Marja Acres will offer several units for seniors on fixed income. This gives
me hope that I might be able to move back.
Marja Acres would be a dream come true for someone like me. I'll do whatever I can to
support the project.
~rely,
./?!rfMorns
Scanned with CamScanner
The Honorable Matt Hall & City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and members of the Council,
I was born in Carlsbad, and recently had to move my family to Phoenix. I still work "in" Carlsbad
but now have to telecommute because even with a dual income family, we couldn't afford to
buy a home anywhere near my husband's and my jobs. That means all my extra money gets
spent in Phoenix.
We were forced to relocate because of the high cost of housing and low inventory.
desperately would like to get back to Carlsbad. A project like Marja Acres gives me hope that
there will finally be an opportunity for us to be home owners. My kids loved Carlsbad. They
miss their friends and their schools. They miss the beach and all the wonderful parks that
Carlsbad has. And I miss my community too.
We need more reasonably priced housing. There is no reason my family should have had to
move. Please approve Marja Acres so we can have a hope of coming back.
Scanned with CamScanner
Teri Delcamp
Principal Planner, Carlsbad Planning Dept
1645 Faraday Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Ms. Delcamp,
September 1, 2020
Thank you for taking the time to read my letter. I am writing today in SUPPORT of Marja Acres.
As a young professional looking to buy my first home, this project creates a real and attainable
opportunity for me.
I work at Thermo Fisher but live in North Park. When we're not in a global pandemic, It is a
grueling commute, but I love my job so I do it every day. My job is a great job and one that I
have worked very hard to attain. In most other communities, my job should and my pay would
afford me an opportunity to achieve the American Dream; the dream of home ownership. But
that's impossible in most of San Diego, especially Carlsbad.
Marja Acres will be located within a few miles of my office. I have dreams of ditching my car
and getting a bike or riding the bus to work. With a shorter commute, I could enjoy life outside
my car and my office. I'd get at least 2 hours back in my day to enjoy all that I'm working so
hard for. However, that's a pipe dream right now, but Marja Acres makes it possible.
I urge you to support Marja Acres! Help people like me live closer to work. And help the
environment by getting cars like mine off the road.
Thank you again for your attention to my letter.
Sincerely,
~
~le Fisher
Scanned with CamScanner
August 12, 2020
The Honorable Matt Hall and Members of the City Council
C/o Teri Delcamp
1635 Faraday
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and Councilmembers,
Today I write to you once more in support of Marja Acres. I support this project because I want
to live there. My family loves Carlsbad and we want to stay here. Both my husband and I work
in Carlsbad, and we feel fortunate to raise our kids here.
Carlsbad is our home, but we are still only renting and can't afford to buy anything. Marja
Acres will provide that opportunity for us to buy a home that we can afford and not have to
invest in costly maintenance to improve it.
Carlsbad is such a wonderful city. Kudos to you and the entire city government for giving us
residents wonderful parks, safe streets, and a sense of community that other cities just don't
have. Now please approve the housing that lets us stay here and build lives here.
Marja Acres can be the next great project here in Carlsbad. I hope you support it.
Scanned with CamScanner
July 14, 2020
Mayor Matt Hall and Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and Carlsbad City Council,
I am writing to you today in support of Marja Acres, a mixed-use project proposed by New
Urban West in the City of Carlsbad. Our region and our city continue to face housing challenges.
People want to work where they live, and we often hear business leaders describing the
difficulties they face attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of housing opp01tunities
in our region. This project is designed in a way that makes new, modern townbomes attainable.
Clustering homes near employment centers and near neighborhoods that already exist is a great
way to reduce commutes and complement the community character. This project would revitalize
the area and create a more walkable, forward-thinking lifestyle to support generations to come.
Marja Acres would be a welcomed asset to our City, please join me in support.
Sincerely,
~£'!<
P.O. Box 130820
Carlsbad, CA 92013-0820
LIVING VALUES
ACHIEV[NG GOALS
P.O. Box 130820 I Carlsbad, CA 92013-0820 I Office: 760-804-0910 I Fax: 760-203-1201 I www.oreillywa.com I CA Life #OF41383
July 27 2020
Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr,
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and City Council,
As a member of the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors I would like to express
my support for Marja Acres, a proposed mixed-use development project by New Urban West.
This mixed-use community is designed to meet the needs of our work force and our vulnerable
aging population by providing attainable market-rate townhomes and affordable senior housing.
Designed with intergeneration living in mind this community will also feature an urban farm, a
commercial core and it is conveniently located close to a major business park.
I would Jike to encourage you to join me in support of Marja Acres.
Sincerely,
Josh Mazur
Scanned with CamScanner
(.;)ELDERHELP
SOLUTIONS FOR LIVING I A NONPROFIT
Planning Commission
City of carlsbad
Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Letter of SUPPORT for Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission Chair Luna and Commissioners:
Marja Acres Is a proposed mixed-use development that wlll bring workforce housing, affordable senior
housing, retail and open space to the Carlsbad communlty. In addition to transforming private land into
a charming, walkable gathering space, the project Incorporates sustainable design practices and
alternate modes of transportation including bike paths and walkways.
To us at ElderHelp, the most important component of this project Is the addition of 46-units of
affordable senior housing. As you may know, ElderHelp has been working with the City of Carlsbad on
launching a dynamic home-sharing effort; a creative alternative to meeting local senior housing
demand. During these encounters with Carlsbad's growing senior population and through our data
research, we know that the need for affordable senlor housing is excessive and the stock ls woefully
Inadequate.
Your vote of support will secure additional senior housing units for this very vulnerable population.
Respectfully,
@ttJ/iU:-
CfO/Executive Director
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Support Senior Housing
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Representing over 5,000 seniors served each year, I want to express general support for development of affordable senior
housing in all regions of County of San Diego.
Serving Seniors is one of the only organizations in the nation providing a broad base of services, including affordable and
transitional housing, to vulnerable, at‐risk older adults. As you can imagine, we hear first‐hand stories of how difficult it is for our
seniors to find safe, secure affordable housing. The lists are long and the task difficult, especially for those with limited mobility
and/or minimal transportation options.
It is my hope that local governments look toward the future and plan to provide the necessary infrastructure (housing, health,
memory care) to serve its growing senior populations so that we all can age in place with support and dignity.
Thank you for your consideration,
Paul Downey
President/CEO
SERVING
SENIORS
Executive Committee: Board of Dlrectors:
Board Chair Philanthropy Chair Joy L. Delman
Lina Ericsson Ted Lange Mary Gendron Finance Chair Members
Rob Borthwick Gwenmarie Hilleary Dale Goldman
Governance Chair Artene Prater Nicole Hagaman
Simon Silva Deborah Linggi
President and CEO
Joni Low Paul Downey 525 14th Street, Suite 200 I San Diego, CA 92101
Jordan Meyers 619-235-6572
Lowell Potiker
Matthew Strauss www.servingseniors.org I Tax 10 #95-2850121
Laura West
September 16, 2019
Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr,
Carlsbad, CA 92008
p h illiPS
a business built on your trust + referrals
Dear Mayor Hall and City Council,
As a member of the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors I would like to express my
support for Marja Acres, a proposed mixed-use development project by New Urban West.
This mixed-use community is designed to mieet the needs of our work force and our vulnerable aging
population by providing attainable market-rate townhomes and affordable senior housing. Designed with
intergeneration living in mind this community will also feature an urban fam1, a commercial core and it is
conveniently located close to a major business park.
As a father, business owner and active volunteer in Carlsbad I see the value this project could bring to our
city. I would like to encourage you to join me in support of Marja Acres.
Sincerely,
JR Phillips
120 I Phoebe Pl
Carlsbad CA 92011
760-402-5321
1201 phoebe place carlsbad ca 92011
p 866-883-6065 f 866-883-1882 e jr@phillipsandco-re.com
bre 01900878 phillipsandco-re.com
Sc anned with CamScanner
V1asat.-"'
August 12, 2019
Dear Mayor and City Council,
For more than 30 years, Viasat has been a leader in the global communications industry and has helped
shape how consumers, businesses, governments and militaries around the world communicate. We are a
growing, innovative company that believes everyone and everything in the world can be connected, all
from our home base right here In Carlsbad.
Viasat is committed to positively impacting people's lives, including our local employees. Our team is
proud to play an active role in our community through Involvement, volunteerism and public stewardship.
We also recognize the challenges our employees and our community may face over the growing concern
over our regional housing needs.
We recently met with New Urban West to learn about their project in Carlsbad called Marja Acres. While
our company does not take positions on projects within the City of Carlsbad, we do support strategies that
attract more attainable, high quality, work-force housing to the area for our current and future employees.
Vlasat employees would value aspects of the project Including the commitment to sustainability through
solar, EV charging stations, water conservation practices and reducing car dependence.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit our Input.
Sincerely,
~4.~-s
Bob Rota
Vice President, Facilities & Security
6155 El Camino Real, Carlsbad, ,California 92009 T. 760.476.2200 F. 760.929.3941 www.vlesat.com
Scanned with CamScanner
t,i,;ison
June 7, 2019
City of Carlsbad
Dear Carlsbad City Council,
Nordson Corporation
2747 Loker Avenue West
Carlsbad, CA 92010
760-431-1919
The Nordson Corporation was pleased to learn about the proposed Marja Acres project in the
City of Carlsbad.
With our electronics business headquarters in Carlsbad, Nordson's designs and manufactures
capital equipment for the global leaders in high tech electronics. We employ more than 600
people in northern San Diego County .. From our engineers to our technicians, it is our priority to
make a positive impact both in the lives of our employees and our community. We take our
community service responsibilities very seriously and support more than I 00 non-profits in north
county.
Our company understands the value tlhat the Marja Acres project will provide by creating
attainable work-force housing for employees like ours. Their sustainable design will allow for
more people who work in Carlsbad to live closer to their place of employment cutting down
commute times and time away from family. At Nordson, we see challenges related to housing,
whether it is from our employees who commute from the Riversideffemecula area or still live
with their parents, to our ability to offer realistic, attainably-priced housing as an option to future
employees.
Nordson is a welcoming place to work and we need to continue to encourage responsible
community projects that build opportunities for our future workforce. We are committed to
continuing to be an integral part of th,~ community where we work and live. Thank you for the
opportunity to submit our support.
Sincerely, 4/, s;✓,;. Lt,.:.~~)
Joseph Stockunas
Executive Vice President
Nordson Corporation
cc: Mayor Pro Tern Priya Bhat-Patel
Council Member Keith Blackburn
Council Member Cori Schumacher
Council Member Barbara Hamilton
City Manager Scott Chadwick
Sc anned with CamScanner
'Dear 'Teri 'Delcam_p,
Pfeas~ SU.P.JJOrt tfie yroyosea 'Marya ?lcres yro_Ject. Carfs6aa is sucfi. a wonaeifu{ city ana we
neea to continue to yfan ana cfiamyion sustaina6fe, weff-desitJnea yro_Jects tfiat suyyort tfie
next 8eneration ana our seniors as we{[
'1 worf Ju.ff time ana am sti« not a6fe to affora a yface of my own, insteaa '1 fiave to fiave
roommates. ?ls an aaina aauft '1 see tfie afforaa6fe fi.ousinafor seniors as a areat 6enejit. Pfease
join me in suyyort for 'Marya ?lcres.
Sincerefy,
Scanned with CamScanner
---~
CARLSBAD
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
May 24, 2019
The Honorable Mayor Matt Hall
City of Carlsbad
Dear Mayor Hall:
I am writing in support of the New Urban West development project called Marja Acres. As you
probably know, Marja Acres is proposed to include 250 Townhome units and 46 Affordable
Senior apartments.
One of the Chambers' mission is to support the growth of the regions' economy which includes
employment housing. A vital part of the growth is a supply of affordable housing that is located
in close proximity to employers. The current supply in Carlsbad is not meeting the need. The
New Urban West project will be located right on El Camino Real, close to shopping, mass transit
and tangential to our major business park. These entry level workforce housing units are key to
increasing the supply needed to keep the price point attainable for our workers. The affordable
senior units are critical for that demographic of our population as well. The project will also
include shops, eateries, and urban farm, open space and more.
Because of the severe shortage of employment housing and the close proximity to the business
park and the high-quality development that is proposed by New Urban West, we feel Marja
Acres will fulfill a great need of our community. We urge you to consider approving this project.
Sincerely,
Bret Schanzenbach
President and CEO
---
cc. Mayor Pro Tern Priya Bhat-Patel
Council Member Keith Blackburn
Council Member Cori Schumacher
Council Member Barbara Hamilton
City Manager Scott Chadwick
5934 Priestly Drive I Carlsbad, CA 92008 I 760.931.8400 T I 760.931.9153F
www.carlsbad.org
Scanned with CamScanner
April 17, 2019
Teri Delcamp,
Principal Planner, Carlsbad Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Ms. Delcamp,
I'm writing today in support ofthe Marja Acres project. My daughter and her family live in
Carlsbad and I would very much like to move back to be Carlsbad to be closer to my daughter
and grandchildren.
Unfortunately, as a senior living on a fixed income, I have chosen to live in Tijuana so that I
don't have to choose between food, rent, and medications. And while, I am happy in Tijuana, I
would love the opportunity to move back to Carlsbad and be near my family. It is my
understanding that Marja Acres will have several units available for seniors on a fixed income.
Living in a project like that would be a dream come true so I'm happy to do whatever I can to
support the project.
51);~~
J9Wrris
Scanned with CamScanner
April 19,2019
Teri Delcamp,
Principal Planner, Carlsbad Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Teri,
My name is Mindy and I grew up in Carlsbad. Sadly, I can't afford to live in Carlsbad anymore
and my kids are growing up in East County. I desperately want to move back and buy a home
that is right size for my family. I have two small children and I want them to grow up in a safe
community with safe parks. And I want them to grow up where I grew up.
I've heard about the Marja Acres project and I want to live there! It's close to an elementary
school, a bus stop, and it will have parks on site. It's exactly what my family is looking for.
We don't want a house with a yard that we have to maintain. And we don't want an old house
where we have to do costly maintenance and upgrades. We want the security of new
construction and a safe environment to live in. ·
. I hope this letter helps.
Scanned with CamScanner
Scanned with CamScanner
April 24, 2019
Teri Delcamp
Principal Planner, Carlsbad Planning Dept
1635 Faraday
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Ms. Delcamp,
My name is Alicia and I support New Urban West's Marja Acres project. I support Marja
Acres because I want to live there. My family loves Carlsbad and we want to stay here.
Both my husband and I work here in Carlsbad, and we feel fortunate to raise our kids
here.
Carlsbad is our home, but we can't afford to buy a home that we want. Marja Acres will
provide that opportunity for us to buy a home that we can afford and not need to invest
in costly maintenance to improve it.
Carlsbad is such a wonderful city. Kudos to you and the entire City for giving residents
wonderful parks, safe streets, and a sense of community that other cities just don't
have.
Marja cres can be the next great project here in Carlsbad. Please approve it.
Scanned with CamScanner
April 27, 2019
Teri Delcamp
Principal Planner, Carlsbad Planning Dept
1645 Faraday Ave
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Ms. Delcamp,
Thanh you for reading my letter. My husband and I are now empty nesters. We
want to downsize and we don't want to spend the second half of our lives
tinhering and updating our next house. And, while we would love to buy a
decently priced single story house that is smaller than ours, that is near
impossible. Investors gobble them all up, restore them, and then either rent
them or resell them at a much higher price than we can afford.
Marja Acres seems lihe a great opportunity for us in the future. We don't need a
yard anymore and we don't need a big house. But we w9uld lihe to be a part of
a community. We lihe the plans we have seen so we support the project.
Thanh you for your time.
Sincerely,
}~ ~
Karin Winter
Scanned with CamScanner
September 18,2019
Carlsbad City Council
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr,
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Dear Mayor Hall and City Council,
You ROPSMANAG ER
THE ICEY TO YOUIII IUSlNE,s SUCCESS
7130 Surfbird Circle
Carlsbad, California 92011
p. 760-603-1800/f. 760-931-1291
www.youropsmanager.com
As a resident of Carlsbad for 21 years, a small business owner for 10 years, and the immediate past
Chair of the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce, I am aware that the state has mandated an additional
3,800 residential units to be built in Carlsbad. In this respect, I would like to express my support
for Marja Acres, a proposed mixed-use development project by New Urban West.
The population that opposes Marja Acres places their opposition on traffic, light pollution,
infrastructure concerns, and all of the usual concerns that come with growth. While I share these
concerns, I would respectfully inquire as to why they weren't working to get Governor Newsom to
understand that the state mandate for 3,800 more units in Carlsbad is contributing to their
concerns. The fact Is, we are being forced to build, so let's build responsibly.
Marja Acres is a well thought out plan that takes the Carlsbad agricultural history, the current
resident demographics, and good stewardship of our environment into consideration.
I would like to encourage you to join me in support of Marja Acres.
Sincerely,
Founder & CEO
Ops Manager, Inc.
Scanned with CamScanner
Planni g Commission
City o Carlsbad
1635 araday Avenue
Carlsb d, CA 92008
Re: S pport for Marja Acres
Dear lanning Commissioners:
I have lived in affordable housing the past two years, after moving from our family home in Oceanside.
My a ordable community managed by USA Properties is called Rancho Carrillo, and it is a safe and well-
run pr perty that is cared for by great staff who maintain and keep up the community. I have great
neigh ors and we are fortunate to have each other. I am grateful for an active life in a vibrant
afford ble community. I hope you will approve more much needed housing like this and I encourage
you t support Marja Acres so others can benefit from the great quality of life in Carlsbad.
WhV t2,r,,,___,
Patrici Ryan
Ranch Carrillo Resident
Carlsb d, CA
Hono ble Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City o Carlsbad
1635 araday Avenue
Carlsb d, CA 92008
pport for Marja Acres
Dear ayor Hall and Councilmembers:
our support of the senior housing project at Marja Acres.
My h~sband and I lived in Oceanside with my granddaughter before we moved to the Rancho Carrillo
Apart ents. We lost our home over 20 years ago and moved into apartment after apartment. It has
been ery hard on us, as we have needed to move due to continued rent increases and changing
circu stances.
Living in Carlsbad makes it easy to commute back and forth to the many medical appointments my
husba d requires. He is legally blind and has suffered multiple strokes.
I have lived at Ranch Carrillo for six months and am so grateful that I have finally found a place I where
my fa ily is close enough to visit, but that I can live an independent life with my husband.
Carls ad, CA
Hono able Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City f Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carls ad, CA 92008
Re: 1 pport for Marja Acres
Dear ayor Hall and Councilmembers:
Pleas vote YES on the Mar"a Acres Pro·ect! We desperately need affordable housing for senior citizens.
Housi g costs continue to climb rapidly, and senior can't keep up. I was a longtime resident of Carlsbad,
and s pport affordable units since many people, like myself, move to Arizona for more options.
Since ely,
enise Cooper
Plan ing Commission
City f Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carls ad, CA 92008
Re: uppon for Marja Acres
lanning Commissioners:
Pleas vote YES on the Mar"a Acres Pro·ectl We desperately need affordable housing for senior citizens.
Hous ng costs continue to climb rapidly, and senior can't keep up. I was a longtime resident of Carlsbad,
and s pport affordable units since many people, like myself, move to Arizona for more options.
Hano able Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City o Carlsbad
1635 araday Avenue
Carls ad, CA 92008
We a e residents of Carlsbad and request your support of the Marja Acres project.
Carls ad Is a special place to live and we are extremely grateful for our last 11 years here. Our
com unity is nestled in a natural and beautiful environment. As you can imagine, living in a friendly,
clean and safe environment is very important to us. In addition, as we age together, wellness is top of
mind so we spend our time walking the beach and swimming the ocean. Living in Carlsbad has made it
possi le for us to teach yoga at the senior center
Unfo unately, finding affordable housing in North County wasn't easy. It took us almost a year to find
an a artment that we could afford, which is why we ask that you continue to support affordable housing
proj cts in Carlsbad. All seniors deserve a safe and rent-reliable place to live. We feel extremely luck
and now there are many couples like us-living on"lrmited income, looking for a comfortable place to
land. /l/
t'. .:.A ? 41 ,J~f.AP('> c. ,
Sine rely, ~ ~ •
~~~\_\_~ ~~~
Ga~ and Maureen Greenwood
Carl1bad, CA 92009
Hon9rable Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City t Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Support for Marja Acres
Dear Mayor Hall and Councilmembers:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres Project! The project includes much needed affordable senior
housrng. Housing prices continue to rise and those of us on a fixed income are falling farther and farther
behind. Our population continues to grow, but minimal preparations are being made to make sure we
have safe housing and transportation.
Elizabeth Coulter
Oceanside, CA 92058
Plan~·ng Commission
City f Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carls ad, CA 92008
Re: 1upport for Marja Acres
DearlPlanning Commissioners:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres Project! The project includes much needed affordable senior
housing. Housing prices continue to rise and those of us on a fixed income are falling farther and farther
behind. Our population continues to grow, but minimal preparations are being made to make sure we
have safe housing and transportation.
Sincerely,
/~~~
Eliza~eth Coulter
Oceahside, CA 92058
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
163~ Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: f up port for Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commissioners:
I wa~ a Carlsbad resident when I was injured by a drunk driver while i:>pped at a stoplight on my way to
church one Sunday morning. I was a single Mom of two teenagers. I had been a nurse for 22 years. I
had saved for retirement and two college educations. My life changed, too; constant pain, a never-
ending parade of surgeries and a handful of autoimmune diseases.
I had never really thought about affordable housing until my life changed. Now, I would be homeless
without it. Please support affordable housing for Carlsbad seniors and disabled residents. You do not
know who will need it next.
Kathryn Campbell
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Honorable Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad,CA 92008
Re: Support for Marja Acres
Dear Mayor Hall and Councilmembers:
I am a1resident of Carlsbad and request your support of the Marja Acres project.
----------
I have lived in affordable housing in Carlsbad for three years, and in other affordable housing prior to
that. Thank goodness I have this opportunity, as I would have options since my husband passed away
five years ago. I know there are a lot of other people facing similar situation as widows or widowers
living iri fixed income. I encourage you to approve Marja Acres and additional affordable housing on
Carlsb~d -it is desperately needed.
Carlsb~d, CA
Planning Commission
City qf Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Support for Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commissioners:
I am a resident of Carlsbad and request your support of the Marja Acres project.
I have lived in affordable housing in Carlsbad for three years, and in other affordable housing prior to
that. lfhank goodness I have this opportunity, as I would have options since my husband passed away
five y~ars ago. I know there are a lot of other people facing similar situation as widows or widowers
living In fixed income. I encourage you to approve Marja Acres and additional affordable housing on
Carlsbad -It is desperately needed.
Sincerely,
Sherrie Hennini.t
Carlsbi11d, CA
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: SUPPORT FOR MARJA ACRES
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! Finding affordable housing is not easy. I had to move out of
my previous home because I could not pay my rent. {I live alone and don't have any extra income.) I
feel lucky to have found an affordable unit in Carlsbad, even though I am hundreds of miles away from
my grown children. If more communities approved affordable housing, more families could live closer
together.
Thank you,
~
Elsa Aguilar
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Honorable Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Support for Marja Acres
Dear Mayor Hall and Councilmembers:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! There is not enough housing for seniors in north county.
Most of us are on a fixed income, and we spend over half of our monthly budget on housing. The
money we have left goes to essentials, such as food, medicine, and transportation. There is certainly
nothing left for entertainment, such as movies or books. California is expensive, and I have thought of
leaving and going somewhere else less expensive -but I don't want to leave my family.
Housing is a basic need. If you do not have housing, you are doomed. Please support more senior
housing.
Gwenette Brooks
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: SUPPORT FOR MARJA ACRES
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! There is not enough housing for seniors in north county.
Most of us are on a fixed income, and we spend over half of our monthly budget on housing. The
money we have left goes to essentials, such as food, medicine and transportation. There is certainly
nothing left for entertainment, such as movies or books. California is expensive, and I have thought of
leaving and going somewhere else less expensive -but I don't want to leave my family.
Housing is a basic need. If you don't have housing, you are doomed. Please support more senior
housing.
;~;:·fl£tt;_ ~
Gwenette Brooks
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: SUPPORT FOR MARJA ACRES
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! We desperately need affordable housing for senior citizens.
Housing costs continue to climb rapidly, and seniors can't keep up. Because of the limited supply of
affordable units, I am grateful that I have secured an affordable unit for myself. This is especially
important for me, because my main source of income is SSI. Please take this opportunity to vote for
Marja Acres so that others have the opportunity to move in to a home they can afford.
Sincerely,
j ~nlJ~
Theresa Wiggins
Oceanside, CA 92058
Honorable Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Support for Marja Acres
Dear Mayor Hall and Councilmembers:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres proiect! We desperately need affordable housing for senior citizens.
Housing costs continue to climb rapidly, and seniors can't keep up. Because of the limited supply of
affordable units, I am grateful that I have secured an affordable unit for myself. This is especially
important for me, because my main source of income is SSI. Please take this opportunity to vote for
Marja Acres so that others have the opportunity to move in to a home they can afford.
Sincerely, .
7~fi1()~
Theresa Wiggins
Oceanside, CA 92058
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: SUPPORT FOR MARJA ACRES
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! When I retired, we moved away from Los Angeles because
my landlord decided to sell the house we were renting. We decided to move to Oceanside because my
son lives here, and we wanted to be close to him and our grandchildren. So many people are looking for
an affordable home, so I feel lucky to have found one so close to my son. Please make it possible for
others like me to be near their loved ones.
Sincerely,
~ ':"--.-4=8~~ ~ ~ ~
Deitrich Fritsch
Oceanside, CA 92058
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: SUPPORT FOR MARJA ACRES
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! I am a carlsbad resident and am living with and raising my
two grandchildren -ages 15 and 13. I feel very lucky to have an affordable place to live, good schools
and a safe community for my grandchildren. There are many grandparents out there like me -
grandparents raising grandchildren -and with escalating housing costs and other essential needs -it
makes it almost impossible to provide all that they need.
Every affordable unit counts!
Sincerely,
r
Martina Christmas
1...ctn:suau, \..I-\ :u.uv-:1
October 1, 2019
Planning Commission
City of carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: SUPPORT FOR MARJA ACRES
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Please vote "YES" on the Marja Acres project! My apartment is very expensive, and I live on my limited
social security check. I have been waiting for more senior housing in Carlsbad, so I can add my name to
the waiting list. This project would be in the perfect place for me, since I don't have a car and need to
rely on my friends and public transportation to get to the senior center.
Sincerely, ~ &-J 6-;)_ 0
K
Pauline Wro®wski
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Honorable Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Support for Marja Acres
Dear Mayor Hall and Councilmembers:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! My apartment is very expensive, and I live on my limited
social security check. I have been waiting for more senior housing in north county so I can add my name
to the waiting list. This project would be in the perfect place for me, since I don't have a car and need to
rely on my friends and public transportation to get to the senior center.
Sincerely, ~~·
k
Pauline Wrotjowski
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Honorable Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Support for Marja Acres
Dear Mayor Hall and Councilmembers:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! After working over 25 years as a nurse's assistant, I retired
from the state of New York and moved to California to help my daughter after she had her baby. The
rents were high when I moved here, so I got my name on a waiting list at an affordable housing project.
I waited seven years. They finally called to tell me that a unit was available. I moved and have been here
ever since. I am doing everything in my power to keep living here. There is no way that I would ever be
able to afford the rents of today on my limited retirement income. Please keep supporting seniors that
have given so much to so many.
Thank you,
Bertha Gladden
Oceanside, CA 92058
Honorable Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City of carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Support for Marja Acres
Dear Mayor Hall and Councilmembers:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! Housing prices keep going up, but our fixed incomes do not.
That is why we need to continue to build affordable housing, especially for senior citizens. This project
will be located on El Camino Real which is located on a bus line -so residents will be able to travel to the
Carlsbad downtown area, local medical facilities, and the senior center. Please approve it today!
Sincerely,
De~~
Oceanside, CA 9205! ;=-; i-1-2---~
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: SUPPORT FOR MARJA ACRES
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! Housing prices keep going up, but our fixed incomes do not.
That is why we need to continue to build affordable housing, especially for senior citizens. This project
will be located on El Camino Real which is located on a bus line -so residents will be able to travel to the
Carlsbad downtown area, local medical facilities, and the senior center. Please approve it today!
Honorable Mayor Hall and Councilmembers
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: Support for Marja Acres
Dear Mayor Hall and Councilmembers:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! Housing prices keep going up, and rents keep going up, too.
I am on a very limited income and recently had to move from a two-bedroom unit to a one-bedroom
unit within my senior affordable unit complex. Like many of us, I just cannot keep up with the rent
Increases. So many of us have worked hard all our lives• we should be able to count on a decent life.
Please support seniors!
Thank yo"jvJ~ , f , j,};(/k_
Josephine ~r ~. NOfq./f
Oceanside, CA 92058
Planning Commission
City of Carlsbad
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, CA 92008
RE: SUPPORT FOR MARJA ACRES
Dear Planning Commissioners:
Please vote YES on the Marja Acres project! Housing prices keep going up, and rents keep going up, too.
I am on a very limited income and recently had to move from a two-bedroom unit to a one-bedroom
unit within my senior affordable unit complex. Like many of us, I just cannot keep up with the rent
increases. So many of us have worked hard all our lives -we should be able to count on a decent life.
Please support seniors!
Thank you, cfaJ~ IL, ,1/~
Josephine Mar:l:ar K, 1'fCIJJit+
Oceanside, CA 92058
Mayor Hall & Council Members,
Please join me in support of Marja Acres.
As pressure continues to mount on San Diego County to provide more housing, Carlsbad needs to be a
leader in meeting housing goals. When we choose to support projects that offer attainable housing
options, walkability, and on-site food sources we are better prepared for our future. People, businesses
and families are constantly looking for opportunities for communities like Marja Acres.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit my comments.
Kindly,
Molly Beane
Dear City Council,
I am writing to you today in support of Marja Acres, a mixed-use project proposed by New Urban West
on El Camino Real. Our region continues to face housing challenges.
People want to work where they live, and we often hear business leaders describing the difficulties they
face attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of housing opportunities in our region. This
project is designed in a way that makes new, modern townhomes attainable.
Clustering homes near employment centers and near neighborhoods that already exist is a great way to
improve climate action goals, reduce commutes and complement the community character. Marja Acres
would be a welcomed asset to Carlsbad, please vote yes.
Sincerely,
Joseph Demarchi
Dear City Council,
I am writing to you today in support of Marja Acres, a mixed-use project proposed by New Urban West
on El Camino Real. Our region continues to face housing challenges.
People want to work where they live, and we often hear business leaders describing the difficulties they
face attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of housing opportunities in our region. This
project is designed in a way that makes new, modern townhomes attainable.
Clustering homes near employment centers and near neighborhoods that already exist is a great way to
improve climate action goals, reduce commutes and complement the community character. Marja Acres
would be a welcomed asset to Carlsbad, please vote yes.
Sincerely,
Jose Cervantes
Mayor Hall & Council Members,
Please join me in support of Marja Acres.
As pressure continues to mount on San Diego County to provide more housing, Carlsbad needs to be a
leader in meeting housing goals. When we choose to support projects that offer attainable housing
options, walkability, and on-site food sources we are better prepared for our future. People, businesses
and families are constantly looking for opportunities for communities like Marja Acres.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit my comments.
Kindly,
Marissa Tucker-Borquez
Mayor Hall & Council Members,
Please join me in support of Marja Acres.
As pressure continues to mount on San Diego County to provide more housing, Carlsbad needs to be a
leader in meeting housing goals. When we choose to support projects that offer attainable housing
options, walkability, and on-site food sources we are better prepared for our future. People, businesses
and families are constantly looking for opportunities for communities like Marja Acres.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit my comments.
Kindly,
Vince Vasquez
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I am writing in support of the Marja Acres project proposed in the City of Carlsbad. This
community is thoughtfully designed with the feel of our city's character in mind. The
townhomes will be attainable for our workforce, many of whom are located in the
business park a short distance away. This community will also build affordable senior
units, create an urban farm, include plenty of park space and have a commercial center
all with a local feel.
Marja Acres uses a sustainable approach to build a community for our future and please
join me in support of this great project.
I lived in Carlsbad for 13 years in a house couldn't afford now. We need housing!
Sincerely,
Gail Friedt
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I urge you to support Marja Acres. Housing is a real challenge in the City of Carlsbad
and the San Diego County region, and we need to embrace positive projects like this as
we plan and advocate for our future.
Supporting Marja Acres will help the inventory with 248 new townhomes, 46 affordable
senior units and offer local commercial amenities. All of which is desperately needed.
Please join me in support of smart planning.
Regards,
Brendan Dentino
Dear City Council & Planning Commission,
I would like you to know that fully support the proposed Marja Acres project in the City
of Carlsbad. There is a huge need for workforce housing and unfortunately, I see the
struggles local employees and family members have to endure as it relates to housing.
From our engineers to our technicians, it is our priority to make a positive impact both in
the lives of our employees and our community.
We were fortunate to be able to buy our home in Carlsbad in 1991 before prices ran up
to what they are today. I see the value that Marja Acres will provide by creating
attainable work-force housing for the city's employees - from engineers to teachers.
Their sustainable design will allow for more people who work in Carlsbad and live closer
to their place of employment cutting down commute times, time away from family and
reducing our carbon footprint. In my line of work, I constantly see challenges related to
housing, whether it is from blue-collar employees who have to commute from Riverside
or reoccurring challenges in recruitment as it relates to housing. We need to continue to
encourage responsible community projects that build opportunities for our future
workforce.
Please join me in support of Marja Acres.
Sincerely,
Eric Armstrong
Carlsbad, CA 92009
--
Dear City Council and Planning Commission,
I am writing in support of Marja Acres. My husband and I are both seniors who would
love to move closer to our grandchildren. The cost of housing and our incomes however
cannot afford us that opportunity in Carlsbad. Not only are housing prices getting out of
control, but so is the price of childcare. I would like to be able to be more involved and
more helpful with my grandchildren to help out my kids. This project's intergeneration
concept is really great and makes me excited about the opportunities Carlsbad could
offer. I don't want to be secluded but I also need something more affordable to be able
to relocate.
Thank you for your consideration.
Karen Campbell
Dear City Council & Planning Commission,
I am writing to pledge my support for Marja Acres. I have lived in North country my
whole life. I am shocked at the prices for senior living communities. It is so sad to me
that are low income elderly aren't taken into consideration for affordable housing. I hope
that one day soon we can start to develop some nice places for them to live. Any project
that would improve the quality of life and promote healthy living should strongly be
considered. Please support and approve Marja Acres.
Thank you, Noelle Demmer
Dear City Council and Planning Commission,
Please join me in support of Marja Acres.
As pressure continues to mount on San Diego County to provide more housing,
Carlsbad needs to be a leader in meeting housing goals. When we choose to support
projects that offer attainable housing options, walkability, and on-site food sources we
are better prepared for our future. People, businesses and families are constantly
looking for opportunities for communities like Marja Acres.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit my comments.
Kindly,
Evan Benko
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I am writing to you today in support of Marja Acres, a mixed-use project proposed by
New Urban West on El Camino Real. Our region and our city continue to face housing
challenges. People want to work where they live, and we often hear business leaders
describing the difficulties they face attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of
housing opportunities in our region. This project is designed in a way that makes new,
modern townhomes attainable.
Clustering homes near employment centers and near neighborhoods that already exist
is a great way to improve climate action goals, reduce commutes and complement the
community character. Marja Acres would be a welcomed asset to our City, please vote
yes.
Sincerely,
Kevin Perry
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I am writing to pledge my support for Marja Acres, a sustainable, mixed-use community
that improves accessibility to housing and transportation to those who need it most. This
project is forward-thinking and has the ability to effect change in the City of Carlsbad by
improving our quality of life through housing and building community.
Marja Acres will provide a balanced intergenerational lifestyle and promote healthy
living. There will be an urban farm, walkable eateries and shops, and free transit passes
for residents. It would be great to have more access to affordable housing, greater
access to a work-life balance and access to living in a community that reduces their
carbon footprint.
Please support this project that helps improve the health and wellness for residents.
Marja Acres will be the first residential project in the city to offer free transit passes to its
residents. These passes can be utilized with all regional transportation services
including NCTD breeze buses to rail lines and even the MTS Trolley Service. I support
this project as it focuses on the goal is to reduce car trips, road congestion, and working
towards reducing our carbon footprint.
Planning Commissioners and City Council, I urge you to approve Marja Acres as this is
the type of sustainable, forward-thinking project that we need in Carlsbad. Our city
continues to face housing challenges, now more than ever with growing affordability
issues and new RHNA targets. This project is designed in a way that makes new,
modern townhomes attainable and offers 48 affordable apartments. Clustering homes
near employment centers and near neighborhoods that already exist is a great way to
improve climate action goals, reduce commutes and complement the community
character.
Please join me in support of Marja Acres.
Sincerely,
Kathleen Mandig
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I am writing to you today in support of Marja Acres, a mixed-use project proposed by
New Urban West on El Camino Real. Our region and our city continue to face housing
challenges.
People want to work where they live, and we often hear business leaders describing the
difficulties they face attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of housing
opportunities in our region. This project is designed in a way that makes new, modern
townhomes attainable.
Clustering homes near employment centers and near neighborhoods that already exist
is a great way to improve climate action goals, reduce commutes and complement the
community character. Marja Acres would be a welcomed asset to our City, please vote
yes.
Sincerely,
Lenska Bracknell
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
Today, I am writing in support of Marja Acres because this project supports my short
and long-term goals. I am mid-way into my career, and I love what I do. I am fortunate
to work in the City of Carlsbad but not fortunate enough to also live there. Instead, I
spend roughly three hours commuting to and from work each day. I am excited about
Marja Acres because I see this project as a real opportunity for me to live where I work
and, in a city, that I love. Having the opportunity to spend less time in the car will
significantly improve my quality of life and allow me to invest in my community.
Please support the Marja Acres project.
Thank you,
Eric Northbrook
Dear Carlsbad Planning Commissioners & City Council
-Please read into the record-
We live directly behind the proposed Marja Acres project off of El Camino Real and
Kelly Drive. Many years ago, we liked the neighbor-centric feel of the businesses
operating there; however, in the past 5+ years most have deferred maintenance and
have lost a lot of appeal for our neighborhood to use and no longer have good
neighborhood benefits.
After we heard that New Urban West had won a bid to redevelop the land, we were
weary of what this will mean for our quiet neighborhood. New Urban West began
reaching out to all of us about 3 years ago.
They held numerous meetings and workshops to get our input and provide up-to-date
information. Most importantly, they listened and changed their design many times to
accommodate our neighbor's requests. We feel that that the design is neighbor-
sensitive and is a good compromise to build the best project for the area.
We are looking forward to new local shops, restaurant, green spaces and the urban
farm. We know there are some concerns over the density of the townhomes, but we
feel that this is necessary to help the housing need in Carlsbad and North County.
We appreciate the time New Urban West has taken to meet us, listen and change their
design for Marja Acres.
Sincerely,
Leticia & Tom Almaguer
Re: Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
Personally, I live in Vista and commute to Carlsbad because my husband and I could not afford to buy a
home in Carlsbad. This was a sad realization for us and I would have loved for a project like this to have
been around when we were first purchasing our home in Vista.
I support Marja Acres because it is a distinctly Carlsbad-centric project meant to help the community
thrive by creating attainably priced housing for families and deed-restricted low-income housing for
seniors, adding needed park space, and creating a true community space. Complemented with a small
urban farm and a balance of retail, Marja Acres will welcome a blend of families, seniors, and individuals
to enjoy all that Carlsbad has to offer. Please vote yes for Marja Acres.
Thank you,
Cedric Hart
Re: Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I support Marja Acres because it is a distinctly Carlsbad-centric project meant to help the community
thrive by creating attainably priced housing for families and deed-restricted low-income housing for
seniors, adding needed park space, and creating a true community space. Complemented with a small
urban farm and a balance of retail, Marja Acres will welcome a blend of families, seniors, and individuals
to enjoy all that Carlsbad has to offer. Please vote yes for Marja Acres.
Thank you,
Nate Lacy
Re: Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I fully support Marja Acres projecct.
As an active resident and realtor, I'm very much aware of the lack of affordable housing in our community.
The Marja Acres project is a distinctly Carlsbad-centric project meant to help the community thrive by
creating attainably priced housing for families and deed-restricted low-income housing for seniors, adding
needed park space, and creating a true community space. Complemented with a small urban farm and a
balance of retail, Marja Acres will welcome a blend of families, seniors, and individuals to enjoy all that
Carlsbad has to offer.
Please vote yes for Marja Acres.This is GOOD for Carlsbad residents, and is right in step with the theme
of our great city, of being progressive for business while also maintaining a proper balance between
family life and tourism.
Sincerely,
Al & Bonnie Rex
Carlsbad, CA 92008
al@alexrealty.com
Re: Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
Please say yes to Marja Acres. Carlsbad needs more housing opportunities so people are able to live
closer to work. This community provides diverse variety to meet the needs of families, seniors and our
workforce. Marja Acres has approximately 248 townhomes designed for professionals and families that
work in Carlsbad and also about 50 desperately needed low-income apartments for seniors.
Please do not turn down the opportunity for more Carlsbad residents to stay in our community or those
that work here to no longer have to commute from another city.
Thank you,
Kyle Simmons
Carlsbad, CA 92009
kyl3simmons@gmail.com
Re: Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I support Marja Acres because it is a distinctly Carlsbad-centric project meant to help the community
thrive by creating attainably priced housing for families and deed-restricted low-income housing for
seniors, adding needed park space, and creating a true community space. Complemented with a small
urban farm and a balance of retail, Marja Acres will welcome a blend of families, seniors, and individuals
to enjoy all that Carlsbad has to offer. Please vote yes for Marja Acres.
Please say yes to Marja Acres. Carlsbad needs more housing opportunities so people are able to live
closer to work. This community provides diverse variety to meet the needs of families, seniors and our
workforce. Marja Acres has approximately 248 townhomes designed for professionals and families that
work in Carlsbad and also about 50 desperately needed low-income apartments for seniors. Please do
not turn down the opportunity for more Carlsbad residents to stay in our community or those that work
here to no longer have to commute from another city.
Sincerely,
Sean Kilkenny
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I support Marja Acres because it is a distinctly Carlsbad-centric project meant to help the community
thrive by creating attainably priced housing for families and deed-restricted low-income housing for
seniors, adding needed park space, and creating a true community space. Complemented with a small
urban farm and a balance of retail, Marja Acres will welcome a blend of families, seniors, and individuals
to enjoy all that Carlsbad has to offer. Please vote yes for Marja Acres.
Thanks,
Aimee
Aimee Beauchane
beauchaneaimee@gmail.com
Re: Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
Marja Acres will be the first residential project in the city to offer free transit passes to its residents. These
passes can be utilized with all regional transportation services including NCTD breeze buses to rail lines
and even the MTS Trolley Service. I support this project as it focuses on the goal is to reduce car trips,
road congestion, and working towards reducing our carbon footprint.
So many workers have to commute in to Carlsbad for work. by increasing mobility and home opportunities
we can start to reduce time in traffic and increase our quality of life.
Planning Commissioners and City Council, I urge you to approve Marja Acres as this is the type of
sustainable, forward-thinking project that we need in Carlsbad.
Sincerely,
Lindsey Walker
Carlsbad, CA 92009
lindsey.walker811@yahoo.com
Re: Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I support Marja Acres because it is a distinctly Carlsbad-centric project meant to help the community
thrive by creating attainably priced housing for families close to work opportunities.
Regards,
Kevin Clemons
xenfect@hotmail.com
Re: Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I’m a millennial who would like to buy a home in Carlsbad.
Currently, I rent my space and am concerned that all the money I pay in rent is doing nothing to support
my long term financial goals of owning a home and having a secure place to live. Generations before me
have had easily accessible opportunities to enter the California housing market, but those are gone now
for me and my peers.
Our generation wants what we can’t have- For our substantial monthly housing costs to go towards
housing that we actually own. And to work near where we live. We know the effects on family life, the
environment, and a community’s quality of life if everyone is renting a making a long commute.
Communities become bland and without character. Carlsbad has an opportunity to do better. With so
many jobs at incredible companies like Viasat, ThermoFisher, and others, we have a talented, educated
and informed workforce that is shaping our wants and needs as a community. The Village is cool; Alga
Norte park is awesome; and the Museum of Making Music is regional gem. Those are just a few
examples of what makes Carlsbad so great. In order to sustain that greatness and that positive
employment growth and energy, we must also provide quality housing opportunities for our workforce,
workers like me.
I don’t think it’s too much to ask to own a home in the community in which I work. Please allow me that
opportunity by supporting Marja Acres!
Thank you,
Erin Kelley
Carlsbad, CA 92009
ekelley127@gmail.com
Re: Marja Acres
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I am a a 55 year resident of Carlsbad, having graduated from CHS in 1969. As a retired banker who
worked in senior management for many of San Diego’s premier banks for over 30 years, I have seen
Carlsbad grow from a sleepy beach community to the vibrant city it has become, due in great part to the
wise decisions of past Planning Commissioners and City Council from the 1960’s and beyond. I worked
for one of the retailers in Plaza Camino Real that opened on March 12, 1969. I finally was able to
become a homeowner in Carlsbad in 1984, and appreciate that previous city leaders had the vision to
allow Carlsbad to grow with residential communities, so that I too could own a home here.
I fully support Marja Acres for the vision they too have to create affordable homes for working residents
as well as low income seniors, who would not otherwise be able to stay in our great city. Please say yes
to Marja Acres. Carlsbad needs more housing opportunities so people are able to live closer to work. This
community provides diverse variety to meet the needs of families, seniors and our workforce. Marja
Acres has approximately 248 townhomes designed for professionals and families that work in Carlsbad
and also about 50 desperately needed low-income apartments for seniors. Please do not turn down the
opportunity for more Carlsbad residents to stay in our community or those that work in many of the first
class businesses that have moved to Carlsbad over the past thirty years. Many cannot live here due to
the high cost of residential housing and are forced to commute from other cities east and south of
Carlsbad. Those who purchase or rent homes in Marja Acres will no longer have to commute from
another city and use the outrageously expensive Carlsbad Connector to get from Poinsettia Station to
their workplace. (I am so very thankful that you stopped this service that offered nothing to the citizens of
Carlsbad, but only to those working here and living south of us). Marja Acres will be the first residential
project in the city to offer free transit passes to its residents. These passes can be utilized with all regional
transportation services including NCTD breeze buses to rail lines and even the MTS Trolley Service. I
support this project as it focuses on the goal is to reduce local resident’s car trips, road congestion, and
working towards reducing our carbon footprint. Planning Commissioners and City Council, I urge you to
approve Marja Acres as this is the type of sustainable, forward-thinking project that we need in Carlsbad.
I live in the residential neighborhood adjacent to Marja Acres and I support Marja Acres because it is a
distinctly Carlsbad-centric project meant to help the community thrive by creating attainably priced
housing for families and deed-restricted low-income housing for seniors, adding needed park space, and
creating a true community space. Complemented with a small urban farm and a balance of retail, Marja
Acres will welcome a blend of families, seniors, and individuals to enjoy all that Carlsbad has to offer.
Please vote yes for Marja Acres.
Steven Ahlquist
Carlsbad, CA 92008
stevenahlquist@gmail.com
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
Please join me in support of Marja Acres. Carlsbad needs more housing opportunities so people are able
to live closer to work and actually afford a home that is considered "workforce housing," which this project
has beautifully designed. This community provides a diverse mix of housing options to meet the needs of
families, seniors and our workforce.
Marja Acres has approximately 248 townhomes designed for professionals and families that work in
Carlsbad and also about 50 desperately needed low-income apartments for seniors. Please do not turn
down the opportunity for more Carlsbad residents to stay in our community, many of which are third or
fourth generation - like me. We want to be able to give back in our own city we grew up in. Instead we are
getting pushed out due to low inventory and the unfortunate rhetoric of "you can't afford to live here, then
leave" mentality. Let's start planning a better future for Carlsbad. Please say yes to Marja Acres.
Jeff Gohsler
92009
jgohsler@gmail.com
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I support Marja Acres because it will be the first residential project in the city to offer free transit passes to
its residents. Sustainability and accessibility are important for the future of Carlsbad. These passes can
be utilized with all regional transportation services including NCTD breeze buses to rail lines and even the
MTS Trolley Service. I support this project as it focuses on the goal to reduce car trips, road congestion,
and working towards reducing our carbon footprint. Planning Commissioners and City Council, I urge you
to approve Marja Acres as this is the type of sustainable, forward-thinking project that we need in
Carlsbad.
Jack Royba
jackdroybal@gmail.com
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
Marja Acres would be a great addition to Carlsbad. Carlsbad needs more housing opportunities so people
are able to live closer to work. This community provides diverse variety to meet the needs of families,
seniors and our workforce.
Marja Acres has approximately 248 townhomes designed for professionals and families that work in
Carlsbad and also about 50 desperately needed low-income apartments for seniors. Please do not turn
down the opportunity for more Carlsbad residents to stay in our community or those that work here to no
longer have to commute from another city.
Marja Acres will also be the first residential project in the city to offer free transit passes to its residents.
These passes can be utilized with all regional transportation services including NCTD breeze buses to rail
lines and even the MTS Trolley Service. I support this project as it focuses on the goal is to reduce car
trips, road congestion, and working towards reducing our carbon footprint. Planning Commissioners and
City Council, I urge you to approve Marja Acres as this is the type of sustainable, forward-thinking project
that we need in Carlsbad.
Sincerely,
mow.wright@gmail.com
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I support this project!
Thank you,
Amanda Seckendorf
92069
amanda@thelandstewards.com
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
This plan, Marja Acres, would definitely attract my elderly parents and me to consider moving to Carlsbad.
I’d like to see this plan go through.
Rung-Kai Tsay
rktsay@gmail.com
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
Please say yes to Marja Acres. Carlsbad needs more housing opportunities so people are able to live
closer to work. This community provides diverse variety to meet the needs of families, seniors and our
workforce. Marja Acres has approximately 248 townhomes designed for professionals and families that
work in Carlsbad and also about 50 desperately needed low-income apartments for seniors. Please do
not turn down the opportunity for more Carlsbad residents to stay in our community or those that work
here to no longer have to commute from another city.
San Diego County faces a severe housing shortage, and a well throught out plan with transit oriented
services connecting to mass transit options assures the city of homeowners at Marja Acres able to enjoy
living in Carlsbad no matter where they work.
Our housing situation has caused many residents priced out of the housing market, and adding inventory
is hte only way to help alleviate that!
Pat Setter
patsetter1@gmail.com
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
As a senior living with little income I am constantly looking for more affordable housing options, because
they are very difficult to find here in Carlsbad. My family and my grandchildren live here and it is important
to me to stay close to them.
I support Marja Acres because this project is meant to help the community thrive by creating attainably
priced housing for families and deed-restricted low-income housing for seniors, like me. There is also
great amenities like park space, community activities and an urban farm. Complemented with a balance
of retail, Marja Acres will welcome a blend of families, seniors, and individuals to enjoy all that Carlsbad
has to offer.
Please vote yes for Marja Acres.
Thank you,
Curtis Wayne
92009
sandiegocurt@gmail.com
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
Carlsbad, as a resident of a senior community I am fully supportive of more affordable senior projects in
No San Diego county. Please approve this and similar projects to give more seniors a safe , affordable
place to live and thrive .
Diane Pauley
diane@richdreams.com
Dear City council Carlsbad,
Please support of Marja Acres, a mixed-use community proposed by New Urban West. This project is
more than a development, it is a lifestyle. Not only will it provide an opportunity for people to buy a new
home in Carlsbad, it also offers amenities for healthier choices and community gathering.
There will be an urban farm onsite offering fresh produce, workshops, events and ingredients to be used
at the project’s farm-to-table restaurant. By having so many resources at our doorstep our dependence
on our cars will also be greatly reduced. The bus stop directly in front of the project is also a big plus for
neighbors and the senior community who will live there too! Robust bike infrastructure and transit
options create alternative transportation options for access to our nearby businesses.
Marja Acres is new way of thinking about where you live, and how you live. Please join me in support of
the New Urban West project.
Regards,
Nate DeYoung
info@workhorsesg.com
Dear City Council Carlsbad,
I am emailing you to stress how important it is to approve projects that have Affordable housing in
them, especially for seniors.
We are a growing population and after the Great Recession more of us lost our savings and cannot
afford to live in Carlsbad. But we have lived here for decades and our families are here.
We need options to stay in this great city. Marja Acres provides almost 50 apartments to help us in
need.
Please, please vote yes for Marja Acres to help seniors.
Sincerely,
Sue McDonnell
Dear Planning Commissioners & City Council,
Thank you for taking the time to read my letter. I am writing today in SUPPORT of Marja Acres. As a
millennial looking to buy my first home, this project creates a real and attainable opportunity for me.
I have a good job that in most other communities would afford me the opportunity to buy a home.
However, I understand that California is different. Still, clustering housing near employment centers like
the one on Faraday is key to our region’s Climate Change goals of reducing GHG emissions and
alleviating long commutes.
A Recent SANDAG study showed that more than 80% of people in North County drive 25 miles or more
to work. I don’t want to be one of those statistics and there is no meaningful long range transportation
option for me that doesn’t involve a car for the first few miles of my commute.
Therefore, I enthusiastically support Marja Acres so we can make meaningful strides to achieving our
climate goals and I can hopefully buy my first home.
Thank you,
Nicolette Peterson
Carlsbad, CA 92008
nicolettealyce@gmail.com
To Planning Commission & City Council,
Please say yes to Marja Acres. Carlsbad needs more housing opportunities so people are able to live
closer to work.
This community provides diverse variety to meet the needs of families, seniors and our workforce. Marja
Acres has approximately 248 townhomes designed for professionals and families that work in Carlsbad
and also about 50 desperately needed low-income apartments for seniors.
Please do not turn down the opportunity for more Carlsbad residents to stay in our community or those
that work here to no longer have to commute from another city.
Sincerely,
Vanessa Cadena
Carlsbad, CA 92009
vcadena@PPBI.com
Dear Carlsbad Planning Commission & City Council,
Marja Acres will be the first residential project in the city to offer free transit passes to its residents. These
passes can be utilized with all regional transportation services including NCTD breeze buses to rail lines
and even the MTS Trolley Service.
I support this project as it focuses on the goal is to reduce car trips, road congestion, and working towards
reducing our carbon footprint.
Planning Commissioners and City Council, I urge you to approve Marja Acres as this is the type of
sustainable, forward-thinking project that we need in Carlsbad.
Thank you,
Nancy Schroeder
nancyives01@gmail.com
City Council & Planning Commission,
I support Marja Acres. I hope to purchase a property when they come on market. I support the Senior
rental apartment concept. Carlsbad has become unaffordable for many, particularly older citizens on
fixed incomes.
Sincerely,
Victoria Heza
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Vich85211@gmail.com
Dear mayor and council members,
I am a 68 year old widow who has worked all her life. I have lived in San Diego area (and raised my
children here) since 1969. I have owned and rented and owned a retail business in Del Mar for 10 years
and always done some type of community service work. But I’m afraid for my future.
I rent and have a room Moro make ends meet. I am on temporary disability but will not be able to return to
the same type of physical work. I am not alone.
We seniors need help.
The community you are establishing sounds wonderful but I could only afford about $600-800 a month for
rent. Please consider Marja Acres. I am one of the lucky ones. Most seniors have to live on that for rent,
car payments, insurance gas food etc. Please recognize the seriousness of our dilemmas. We have
worked long and hard. Paid our taxes. Given back to our communities.
Thank you,
anne distel
lisadisteldesigns1@yahoo.com
Dear Mayor, City Council, and Planning Commissioners,
I believe we need these kind of update and affordable homes And it’s a beautiful place for seniors to feel
they well have everything available and desable. Please Lets go forward with Marja Acres
Thank you
Tony Moran
Susana Aranda59@gmail.com
To Mayor, Council and Planning Commission,
I look forward to completion of your Marja Acres project. I am a low-income senior and I would like to
apply to live at Marja Acres.
Thank you.
Kathleen Bailey
kbaileyrealltor@cox.net
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I would like to thank you for considering this project. The shortage of senior living as well as low income
senior living is lacking in Carlsbad.
I so look forward to this project being built as well as others.
Thank you for your time.
Lisa Morganti
lmorganti08@gmail.com
Dear Mayor & City Council,
Having been in the reverse mortgage industry for eight years helping seniors stay in their homes, and 30
years of local community banking prior to that, I’ve seen the tremendous need for senior housing in
Carlsbad.
Marja Acres Has a wonderful plan to create a significant number of low income senior housing in the
neighborhood adjacent to my neighborhood. I fully support this project and urge you to likewise support it,
and help our local seniors be able to remain in Carlsbad.
Sincerely,
Steven Ahlquist
92008
Stevenahlquist@gmail.com
Re: Marja Acres:
I support this much needed project. It has everything that I as a Senior citizen feel is needed for our
community. I love the concept of having shopping, free transportation, low income Senior apartments,
gardens, and all the other amenities.
I am hoping this project go through and get’s on the way to becoming a reality. I also love the fact that it
affords different age living, I know as a Senior I love hearing the sound of children playing, laughing etc.
Sincerely,
Diane Zurba
Dianezurba@att.net
Dear Planning Commission & City Council,
I support this community, Marja Acres. I believe it is well thought out and will be a great addition to
Carlsbad.
Thank you,
Amanda Seckendorf
amanda@thelandstewards.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because there are many seniors who rely on S.S. only and are in need of
Affordable Housing.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Barbara McWherter
Renae1943@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because San Diego seniors need more affordable housing.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Nancy Smith
Findsteph_@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because this additional senior housing would provide living accommodations to
those in great need. The supply is very limited.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Jack Nevins
kackknevins@hotmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because I think it is important to show we are concerned for those who are less
fortunate.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Robert Groth Sr.
Groth31@cox.net
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because I am blind and need a safe place to live.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Celia Dennison
Loki52000@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because we definitely need more and better senior housing, especially more
affordable.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Diane
diane@richdreams.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because I’m interested in senior living.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Marylou Holland
92009
Padrefan53@aol.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because there is a need.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
George Murrill
Murrillg@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because we need more senior apartments at a reasonable rent payment. To be
able to stay in Carlsbad area due to high costs, being on SSI and lower rent.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Teresa Wiggins
wigginsdbi@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because living on social security is difficult and all areas need Affordable housing.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Mary Carlin
Andshekry3@gmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because Carlsbad is a beautiful community and seniors and other low-income
people deserve an equal opportunity to enjoy it by living in the community and supporting it.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Randall Kall
Fatfishfarms888@gmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because this affordable complex is very needed in this area and senior living/all
living ages is vital to Carlsbad community.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Guenette Brooks
92009
givennbrooks@rocketmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because without it, there will be many homeless seniors.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Carla Partida
92009
carlapartida@gmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because we need more affordable housing for seniors.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Ana Kourakis
onetightfam@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because I live in a traditional apartment now, not affordable, which takes basically
almost all of my income especially with the new trend of charging water, sewer, and trash over the least
8+ years.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Aileen Cogmon
acogmon@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because we need more senior housing. I need it too, because Carlsbad is safe for
our family and it is more secure.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Cyrus Hariri
92009
Hariri_56@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because it is desperately needed in our community and other communities,
however you need to scrutinize all upcoming residents.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Elizabeth & Jim Coulter
Lizzygirl3@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because the price of housing in North County is skyrocketing – reaching crisis
proportions.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Edward Boss
92009
Designnovation@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because there is such an overwhelming need for this type of construction.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Tina Kreubeck
92009
thetinatalk@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because this is the best for seniors like me.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Elsa Aguilar
92009
Eslapto_usa@hotmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because housing is desperately needed! For many reasons.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Charlotte Salisbury
buchcat@earthlink.net
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because it is desperately needed for many people.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Elizabeth & Jim Coulter
lizzygirl@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because I couldn’t afford to live in Carlsbad without affordable housing.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Jamie Sousie
92009
jamiesousie@gmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because it will help a lot of people.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Paul Olefremo
92009
Succsessteamb1m@gmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because seniors need affordable housing.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Bridgette Garcia
92009
Bridgette.garcia@smuso.org
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because senior affordable is very necessary as we are now on lower income and
rising costs.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Minni Salzman
minniesalzman@gmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because we really need more affordable senior housing.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Debra Badorski
Debra.badorksi@gmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because we need more affordable senior housing.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
June Boston
Junebugrose.33@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because our seniors need more help.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Madina Mehr
92009
Madinamehr88@gmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because I feel more seniors should be in a community with people their age and
more in common.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Alex Hanel
92009
Ahanel30@gmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because the importance of making affordable housing for seniors.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Afshan Ismail
Afshanismail26@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because much need it.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Nataly Munoz
92009
natalyangeles@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
I support Marja Acres because we need more.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Sherri Henning
92009
Zsharoo2@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Dietrich Fritsch
dfritsch@outlook.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Delena Lorett
dmlorett@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Martina Christmas
92009
Mchmpnao40@att.net
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Glenn Martinez
92009
Mgloriaoxn5@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Harold K. Reid
Halreid75@gmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Esperanza De La Fuente
espidif@hotmail.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Lionel McDonald
diane@richdreams.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Guillen
92009
elizabethpgza@yahoo.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Maureen & Gary Greenwood
92009
ggreenwood@twc.com
Yes! I support Marja Acres.
Carlsbad needs Senior housing. Please approve the 48 new units of much needed low- to extremely-low
income senior housing in our community
Sincerely,
Saiyana Pouy
92009
Saitana.pouy@gmail.com
I ~ ~;:1N~!~!:~H?u~;.p~~~:!v~6~~~i~~much
needed low-to e><tremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Aaes because ...
~
t to show my support by .••
Writing a letter in support
Hosting my neighbors: for coffee
to meet with the project team
/;;znc,.sq;
0 Attending a public meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting
rlores
FIRST NAME / 1 • ~STNAME
ADDRESS
t%.ean s ,de cA ·
ZIP CODE
l'HONt EMAIL
~ !!!1 N~~!:;H?!;. ~1!~~:v~ 46 ~;~;~ much
needed low• to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
0 Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
0 Attending a public meeting
0 Speaking at a pubC,c meeting
-1?. a Cd---4 ~ J,,¥-,, FIRST NAME e ~~
r!TV ZIP CODE
EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
C.rlsbad N~s S<-nior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
nl'eded low• to extremely-low income se nior housing in our community.
l s upport Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ... 7 Writing a lette< in support
~ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
'-' to meet with the project team
FlmOJ ,-
r1TV
LJ Attending a publit meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting
R::1e r ,/
J A~T N6U~ /
£MAIL
I'~ ;;~; N~!~!:;H?u~; P~~~~v~46~~~i~; much
needed low• to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Actes because ...
I want to show my support by ...
i23 Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
LA ¼N N e
FIRST NAME
ADDRESS
{) c.ew5,Je..
0 Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
BjLLu.t-ti
LAST NAM E
CITY
t"MUN~
ZIPCODE /2
EMAIL~
~ !,~!1 N~~!.:;H~u!; P~~:,fv~ 46 ~e~~i!:, much
needed low-to e><tremely-low income senior housing in our community. ~ S
Q3 Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
12) Attending a public meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting
.... ,...,.. .. , .....
ADORE.SS
til6/cl& (!I}../
ZIP CODE ··· Ala-
EMAIL
t ~ !r:!! N~?e!:;H?u~;p~~~~~46~~~i=~uch ,.
needed low~ to extremely-low income senior housing in our <ommunity.
l s upport M,nja Acres b@cause ... / ~::
Pj •R n r>caA I ;?t
--x'.) 8 e d ~
J want to s how my support by ...
@ Writing a letter in support
D Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
rn OJL.u c;;.;._
FIRST NAME (\
~~
0 Attending a public meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting
~ ~ ~
LAST NAME
r1Tv ZIP CODE
--?Y:\ 0
PHONE EMAIL
I ~ !~~1 N
1
e!?!o~H?u~n;. P~~~:!~4~e~~i~ ~much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing ln our community.
~<><,.IA..,·
I want to show my support b
0 Writing a letter in support 0 Attending a public meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting □ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
t{dr{Jt~%= Jc~ LAST NAME
ZIP CODE
PHOl'i!E EMAIL
~ !:!1 Nle!~:o;H~!; P~~!,1v~ ~e~~i:!much
needed low-.to extremely~low income senior housing in our community.
1 support Marja Aci-es because... rr f p.tJl/ 1 Pl Ll;W I Ak;l f~1.
I ~t to show my support by ...
,EJ Writing a letter in support
D Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
-Jilft~
FIRST NAME
ADDRESS
Ot,,f~Als:t/;f
H'{;lf 5 /Al~
0 Attending a public meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting
/I ff{; w ~ P.D
.S NAME
(ITV ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
~ !::1 Nll~!;H?u~n;P~~~;!f46~e~~i~~~h~
needed low• to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marfa Acres because... J' a,n, f'~ r-y ( ~W t-ne<J lne.. avvd
d4,percvTe-':J ~ '1-h ~,;si{sC-~ (tv'i'~ ~~
tner~e 'I afpnu,i4;te. t"he f'"n:1hle.-"'1,~
l want to show my support by ...
~ Writing a letter in supportc
D Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
,vt.illfcenC Boh/e,er
FIRST NAME
ADDRESS ,
O Attending a public meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
~ s,-cile.1 c,q
CITY ZIP CODE
rt o cermpv ter
EMAIL
✓ !!!1 N~!~!:~~us~; P~~:r~v~46~~~i~~ much
needed low-to extremely-low lncome senior housing in our community_
I support Marja Acres because ...
-r U¼/L 1 · ;&-~
I want to show my support by ...
0 Writing a letter in support
D Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
~ev~
FIRST NAME /)
G}'l(ttending a public meeting
0 Speaking ata public meeting
4.AST NAME
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
~ V r~~1 N~~~!.:;H?u~; p~~~r:v~ 46 ~~~.~~ much
needed low-to e<tremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because. ..
?
~Jo 4Q4IJ
I want to show my support by ...
0 Writing a letter in support
D Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
0 Attending a public meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
~ !!b~1 N~~?e~~H~u~;. P~~:r~v~46~e~~= ~ much
needed lovv-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja A◄cres because ...
I want to show m1r support by ...
J2{" Writing a letter iin support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the, project team
FIRSTfrEw.4-.La~,4 ✓
--< ADDRESS
JJ~fi<'
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a1 public meeting
I A~T NAMF
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our comtnunit11•
I support Marja Acres because ...
to show my support by ...
LJ Writing a letter in support
[l Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
fti~gi''ct± FIRS NAME "
ADDRESS
t> CEA:JSJ s:lbc
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
0 lv1~s/A
LAST NAME
cr~os?5
r1Tv ZIP CODE
'--PHONE/ EMAIL
..
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
Q Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
FIRST~-Lz.v;,-.
ADORE~
D~5i&
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
-v? r;~ N~~;H~~; P~~!:!!-46~•:~i~~ much
n~ d'l' d I ,~ to ~~b '"' ,1 "'-lo, income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show n1y support by ...
\ riting a I tter in support
H ~ting m neighbors for coffee
to rn~t ,~ ·th the project tenm
CA
[ Attending a public meeting
[ Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
CIT ZIP CODE
EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
~riting a letter in support
-Hosting my neighbors for coffee
~eet:h the project team
Fl RST NA'E C'\ /
CITY. l -I'\. --.---..
Pl-fONE EMAIL
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
&:/{iCfW
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I supp,ort Marja Acres because ...
.,~ ~ ~ £? ~~ JJ fqw ~
I want to show my support by... ~ o-r---(;;
L Writing a letter in support D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting D Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team F~T~~~ I ACT I\.IAl'..11:
A;; ti-&CV' 5 ; J_,___
~:::>
t-'HUNt:
ZIP CODE
/U() µ'L
EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
~ Writing a letter in support
0 Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
(u 9ao58
CITY . ZIP CODE
EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
0 Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
FIRST NAME
1!J Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
~~,{<clv Cc. q ,2_0 s?
CITY ZIP CODE
EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES ~,
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I want to show my support by ...
/writing a letter in support
Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
F~ ~ d2_ff/4
-Auu~c.:>.:> V
IJee!UJ11k
[~ttending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
CITY
PHON~
ZIP CODE
EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
CITY .
1-'-NUN t: -I EMAIL
YES! I SUPPOR.T MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
L Writing a letter in support
D Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
• I •
ADDRESS
ffAttending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
,:$gYl lf\-\QJ'<PS
CITY
Cld:-(2<,q
zili• CODE
PHONE EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
~«----
1 -U.ant to show my support by ...
0 Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
<;)G e;~~ 51114 c!AlcZ-
ADDRESS
G-1(ttending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
l)~~Mb1f£ C~~ Cj~sg
CITY / ZIP CODE ----PHONE EMAIL
YE~S! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Ma.rja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
LJ Writing a l,etter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
C F\B,LQS
FIRST NAME
ADDRESS
Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
O c.e-a:n.s~de, c & q2.o s-e
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
~ w~ show my support by ...
)L1"'"Writing a letter in support
. -, Hosting my neighbors for coffee
LJ to meet with the project team
O Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
FIRST NAME LAST NAME
ADDRESS
IJ ~-;+-5 J .,l::>G" 9.2.os-F'
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
.:,
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
L Writing a letter in support
[ I Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
[J Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
FIRST~ (R~ilgt°gj}---
Ana~ '1 sa
Cl~ ZIP cQ:0
PHONE EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
D Writing a letter in support ~ttending a public meeting
□ Hosting ~y neighbo~s for coffee D Speaking at a public meeting t~~~ ~~~t proJect team ~ J2IJ.:A
~NAME LAST NAME
ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES .
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much ~
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
~/t to show my support by ...
~ Writing a letter in support
D Hosting my neighbors for coffee
wt with the project team
FIRST NAME ,.... / r
PHONE EMAIL
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
Tu{_ch;-07
LAST NAME
YES! I :SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approv1:! 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
0 Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
FIRST NAME
,-I
D Attending a public meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
AdDR£°SS
QLE.lt.tt.S ;LIL
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ... ,hr;"".) ~it I\ d; i< ,',-, covrf:
L h,)O:,) '-J_ "'f-:"t:::"b \; v<£ 5D Y>) >u.;-, X.o.)lSU \cl be ~
I want to show my support by ...
'g Writing a letter in support
7 Hosting my neighbors for coffee
W to meet with the project team
ADDRESS
Ocu:kws~dr::
Attending a public meeting 5 Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
------■-----------·------------------
YES! I SUPPOR~r MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housin9. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
1 supp<>rt Marja Acres because ... t-Je&cl /V\D~ SE/\1.,·oR. flotts1t17?
A rl::o·P-.ci46 IF?
I want to show my support by ...
Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
FIRST NAME
ADDRESS
OC.E/f~ 5', ·cl£
I • f
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
(;zwnt4-k/4o
LAST NAME
~CITY
'""PHONE
ZIP 4CODE -
EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approvE~ 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior hoiusing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because... 1. {JJ:J /Jt)f ,f _ $ M{e
~t!f tf aqmtd r/oc fFLW~-
I want to show my support by ...
~riting a letter in support
I Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
FIRST NAME
ADORES~
(n-;;w./ <k/0&:
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
CITY ZIP CODE
PHON'E • u
EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
[1 Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team ez~'-~ f eru2-
FIRST NAME,..
ADDRESS
C-N-Ls b,J
CITY
~nding a public meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
IP CODE
~
'PHONE EMAIL
YES! I SUPPO]RT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Houi;ing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
8~ C A-t-t.S-e I bA: zpQ.. F-e. w <;.ott> [) PR L e N Ds.
jt:p_. AµB:f ni -alll 7<;> t! 1t-g_ G-R, Qr}--t-l
I want to show my support by ...
0 Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
FIRST ¾_
ADdRESS
~ending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
Gz~od ,() C £4--fiL Sl p .R._
CITY ... _ ZIIPCOD~
EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
\ltLe o1 5-eY\ l C)--V
I want to show my support by ...
Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
D Attending a public meeting
0 Speaking at a public meeting
'~h:i cc a.
FI _RST NAME ~ R~E
I •
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I suppo,rt Marja Acres because ...
I want 1to show my support by ...
L Wriiting a letter in support
1 Hos.ting my neighbors for coffee
L to meet with the project team
FIRST N.AME
~ Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
7 !!!1 N~?er;H~u!; P~~!r~v~ 46 ~e~~i~ ~ much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
FIRST NAME
ADDRESS
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
@Cffff.> Id£
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja cres because ...
D Attending a public meeting
ng at a public meeting
PHONE EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ...
L Writing a letter in support
[_ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
f.fJ&< -Ck~)
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
FIRST NAME LAST NAME
,
ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
~ !!!1 N~~r;H~u~n; P~~!:!v~46~e~~i~ ~ much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I want to show my support by ... 0 Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
~iM /1 /J
~ TY
--.... ,J
PHONE EMAIL
~ Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
4tw~lal?
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of m uch
needed low-t<> extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
I wa t to show my support by ...
Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
ADDRESS
D&~Pt r1Tv ZIP CODE
EMAIL
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
I . I 75? '7?SD"5Piff
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to e><tremely-low income senior housing in our community.
~ ----;
I want to show my support by ...
D Writing a letter in support
□ Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the projec:t team
~ ,,_
D Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
LAST NAME
~DRESS •
~&,,~. {k__, 7 9 2d 5P'.
CITY ZIP CODE
PHONE EMAIL
YES! I S'UPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Ac es becaus ...
I want to show my sup,port by ... ~ a letter in support
Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the projE!ct team
FIRST N Mt _
'ADDRESS L ,, >
C,.V¼ai, a.
Cl
PHONE
D Attending a public meetin~~
0 Speaking at a public meeting
Js~je,J
ZIP CODE
EMAIL
YES! I SUPPORT MARJA ACRES
Carlsbad Needs Senior Housing. Please approve 46 new units of much
needed low-to extremely-low income senior housing in our community.
I support Marja Acres because ...
' ..,,. .. Jt to show my support by ...
7~riting a letter in support
r, Hosting my neighbors for coffee
to meet with the project team
ltl Attending a public meeting
D Speaking at a public meeting
FIB?r£.!)f ~ a.., . D ~'IZ J::i;\ ' LA~T NA/)'1 E
PHONE EMAIL ;;;,-
'
From:City Clerk
To:Teri Delcamp; Don Neu; Melissa Flores
Cc:Faviola Medina; Mia De Marzo; Hector Gomez
Subject:FW: Marja Acres Traffic Concern
Date:Tuesday, October 27, 2020 9:11:23 AM
Kind regards,
Tammy McMinn, CPMC, CMCSenior Deputy City ClerkCity of Carlsbad760-434-2953
-----Original Message-----From: Suzanne Fischer [mailto:suzannerfischer@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 8:35 AMTo: City Clerk <Clerk@carlsbadca.gov>Subject: Marja Acres Traffic Concern
I am a homeowner at Robertson Ranch and I’m concerned about the potential impact of increased traffic from MarjaAcres at my community on Camino Real between Tamarack and Cannon. Already we have too much traffic on thatstretch, and drivers are using Robertson Road ad a speedy shortcut, putting pedestrians and children at risk.
Please reconsider this development.
Suzanne Fischer
Carlsbad
We have been researching this development for a little more than 4 years now. We have met with staff, includingplanners, staff civil engineers and housing directors-multiple times.Recently I have met via telephone or in person, Dr. Priya Bhat-Patel, Cori Schumacher and Keith Blackburn aboutthis development.
Many of you are concerned about the impact of *TRAFFIC* to the area. This post will discuss that issue.
The Traffic report submitted to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) using the LOS methodology showed afailing grade from the road segment on El Camino Real from Tamarack Southbound to Cannon Rd. (see photo).With the addition of at least 650 (expected) cars from the Marja Acres development to join the failed segment, thisstretch of road promises us a quagmire of congestion. No joke.
Under the Growth Management Plan (GMP) passed by voters in 1986 which prohibits development if a segmentreaches a grade of E or F (in an A-F grading scale where E or F =Fail), the City has found an alternate way ofbypassing the GMP by including in the update to the General Plan (2015), a way to allow growth with a failingroadway.
This methodology is called "exemption". When roads fail, the segment is "exempted" from the Growth ManagementPlan and the development is allowed to go ahead.When it was shown (see photo) that the current segment has already failed using the LOS methodology, the Citystaff decided to arbitrarily use a new VMT methodology which, as of July 1, 2020 is now the legal, state mandatedmethodology. This methodology allowed the Traffic report to show a passing grade for traffic. What should havebeen used was the LOS method since that methodology was in effect when the project was deemed complete inDecember 2018.
Submitted by the Traffic Dept. consultant, Kimley Horn, this table (pg. 74) was included in the City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service (LOS) Analysis submitted February 2020 showing the Grade F at the segment betweenTamarack and Cannon without the Marja Acres development.
On November 3rd, staff proposes to exempt El Camino Real between Tamarack and Cannon Road so that itbypasses the Growth Management Plan and allows the Marja Acres development.
Please write to the City Council. clerk@carlsbadca.gov
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
From:Madeleine Szabo
To:CAF@LFAP.com
Cc:City Clerk; Council Internet Email; KHL@LFAP.com; Planning
Subject:Marja Acres
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:49:10 AM
Catherine Ferguson
Attorney at Law
Escondido, CA
re: Marja Acres Development, Carlsbad, CA
Dear Ms. Ferguson,
Your public comments are nasty and unfounded. You wrongfully chastise Carlsbad
residents who are concerned about the excess traffic, environmental impacts, and
strain on City services that high-density Marja Acres will bring.
While your pro-housing efforts are laudable, dense housing should not be at the
detriment of the environment and of a City's defining attribute (for Carlsbad: "small-
town feel of our beach-side community"). Your defamation of character about the
residents who are against the project is insulting and misguided: saying that we are
"thinly veiled attempts to keep lower-income people and minorities out...." is
unprofessional and a false allegation.
Traffic is the concern. The impact on the environment is the concern. The
overcrowding of the schools is the concern. The overbearing control of Sacramento
on local self-governance is the concern.
Carlsbad should not have to bear the burden of 296 residential units (most with 2 car
garages) packed into a small area whose roads cannot handle the increased traffic. It
is undemocratic for Sacramento to impose such autocratic dictates on residents in
their own community. You should be on the side of the people. You should consider
the right of communities to live by its own devised General Plan (in this case: Marja
Acres is ~100 more units than our GP!).
The only way to control the high cost of housing is to rollback the costly regulations,
the high taxes, and excessive fees imposed on developers, construction, and the
entire supply chain. Why do you think California has the highest cost of living in the
nation? Simply this: oppressive public policies that burden the consumers who
ultimately pay for them.
Our objection to destroying and overtaxing the environment has nothing to do with
personal prejudices which are largely nonexistent. We are an altruistic community
and do everything to help fellow residents (residents of all colors, economic status,
and ethnicity). As an outsider, you should be ashamed of your lack of awareness and
for your contempt of people who have a right to live in an uncrowded unclogged
environment. Your assumptions about our motivations are blasphemous.
If you really want to promote affordable housing, then lobby for lower taxes and the
repeal of costly unnecessary regulations (a typical example is Senate Bill 969: all
garages have to have electric door openers that have a battery backup....this is just
one of hundreds of frivolous regulations that drives the costs up and controls
individual choice on what is deemed necessary and worthy of financing).
You should be promoting the democratic right for towns/cities to govern according to
the policies established by its residents.
Madeleine Szabo
Carlsbad, CA
mbszabo@snet.net
cc: Carlsbad City Council
Carlsbad Planning Department
bcc: Carlsbad Residents for the Right to Self-Govern
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
From:City Clerk
To:Melissa Flores
Cc:Hector Gomez; Mia De Marzo; Faviola Medina
Subject:FW: Marja Acres
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 8:57:32 AM
From: Sandra Meador <meador.s409@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 8:22 AM
To: Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: Marja Acres
Please respect our General Plan and do not approve the proposed project.
Sincerely,
Sandra Meador
Carlsbad, CA 92008
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
From:Don Neu
To:Melissa Flores
Subject:FW: Marja Acres project
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:43:47 AM
For the City Council staff report.
-----Original Message-----
From: Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:43 AM
Cc: Teri Delcamp <Teri.Delcamp@carlsbadca.gov>; Don Neu <Don.Neu@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: FW: Marja Acres project
-----Original Message-----
From: Therese Dolkas <theresedolkas@earthlink.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:29 AM
To: City Clerk <Clerk@carlsbadca.gov>; Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: Marja Acres project
Dear Council members and city clerk,
The development at Marja Acres will cause more problems on El Camino Real. The road will not be able to handle
that many cars. Please do not let this development circumvent our Carlsbad General Plan. Our streets, schools and
city services will be strained. Please don't allow concessions or waivers in regards to development standards. We
have a Carlsbad General Plan. Please follow it.
Thanks, Therese and Steve Dolkas (Carlsbad residents for 46 years)
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Planning Commissioners,
I want to follow up with you on problems with traffic impact analysis (TIA) studies being presented to
you in development applications. I feel there are serious biases that need to be addressed, and I think
the best approach is to bring them out into the sunlight. As a fellow commissioner and someone who
has studied traffic issues in Carlsbad for almost a decade, I hope you will read on and follow me a short
distance into the “weeds” on this topic. And, if you have any questions, comments, or doubts—or if you
get a different story from somebody else—please contact me for follow-up.
One major problem I raised with the Marja Acres TIA was the last-minute reduction of the project’s
average daily vehicle trips (ADT) from the more realistic 2,334 ADT figure contained in the final
environmental impact report (EIR) to the ridiculously low 901 ADT contained in the Local Mobility
Analysis (LMA). This change was driven by an artificial increase in the number of trips subtracted from
the total based on existing traffic at the project site. However, the 2,334 ADT figure is based on
subtraction of actual traffic counts at the driveways going to the existing businesses, while the 901 ADT
figure is based on the use of a SANDAG estimator that used generic business types and square footages
to estimate the subtracted ADT.
Response 1: This comment questions the validity of how the net trip generation from the proposed
project is calculated. Generally, net trips are the difference between the proposed
project trips and the trips generated by existing uses on the site.
The Marja Acres project application, including the draft transportation analysis, was
submitted in 2016, well before the introduction of the city’s Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)
Guidelines in 2018 that contains specific methodologies for calculation of trip generation.
The project did initially use traffic counts measured at the driveway to estimate existing trip generation. This methodology represents a single snapshot in time of the number of
trips. There may be many factors that affect the number of trips measured at the time of
the counts such as retail occupancy, time of year, roadway construction, and
redistribution of traffic due to congestion or collisions.
After the implementation of the TIA Guidelines, the project was required to update the
transportation analysis to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. The process to
update the project’s transportation analysis to be consistent with the TIA Guidelines
required several iterations of review and comments from staff. The method for traffic
generation is prescribed in the TIA Guidelines and the project traffic analysis applied the
appropriate trip generation methodology.
Methodologies to be used for trip generation calculation are prescribed Section 5,
“Traffic Generation,” of the TIA Guidelines. The trip generation for both the proposed
and existing use on the Marja Acres site were derived from the SANDAG “(Not So) Brief
Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region” in accordance with
the TIA Guidelines. The TIA Guidelines recommend use of SANDAG trip generation rates
when available. If SANDAG rates are not available, the guidelines outline other
methodologies that may be considered. Collection of driveway counts at a single site is
not consistent with the prescribed options in the guidelines. The trip generation rates for
a land use provided in SANDAG’s Not So Brief Guide are based on empirical data from
several comparable sites in the San Diego region or on other reports and studies. Best
practice for evaluating trip generation for a site involves using typical trip generation
rates for a particular land use, rather than data associated with a single site. This ensures
that trip generation is based on vetted empirical data, is consistent with previous
entitlements for the site, and is not founded on a particular set of tenants or traffic
conditions, which are subject to fluctuation.
The proposed project’s trip generation is 3,034 ADT and the existing uses produce 2,133
ADT based on SANDAG trip generation rates. The net trip generation (3,034 – 2,133) is
901 ADT. The driveway counts taken in 2017 resulted in 700 ADT, which was only an
estimate of daily trips based on counts collected during peak hours. As previously
discussed, driveway counts are subject to fluctuation given certain circumstances at the
time of measurement. The net trip generation using the driveway counts (3,034 – 700) is
2,334 ADT.
During the 9/16/2020 public hearing, staff claimed that this was not a shenanigan, and that they were
required by Carlsbad’s TIA Guidelines to use the SANDAG estimator to re-calculate the subtracted trips.
But that is just more shenanigans. While claiming they had to follow the TIA Guidelines for this purpose
in the LMA, staff simultaneously argued in the final EIR that they were not required to follow the TIA
Guidelines (in order to avoid accountability for not having executed the required TIA Scoping Agreement
with the Marja Acres developer).
Response 2: Staff did not take the position that the Marja Acres project was not subject to the TIA
Guidelines. Scoping Agreements are submitted prior to initiating a transportation
analysis. Marja Acres project had submitted a transportation analysis (2016) prior to
implementation of the TIA Guidelines (2018). The intent of the scoping agreement,
according to Section 3.1 of the TIA Guidelines, is to establish the base input parameters, assumptions, and analysis methodologies for the transportation analysis. Please note
that the scoping agreement does not impact whether the project traffic analysis is in
conformance with the TIA Guidelines. Per Attachment A in the TIA Guidelines, the
transportation analysis that is identified in the scoping agreement may be subject to
revision. Staff did not argue that the project was not subject to the TIA Guidelines.
Because a traffic analysis was under review prior to the implementation of the TIA
Guidelines, there was no purpose for a scoping agreement. Please refer to Response 1
regarding SANDAG trip generation rates.
But even if we ignore these completely contradictory statements about the necessity to follow the TIA
Guidelines, if we assume (correctly) that staff did have to follow them, they do not require the use of
the SANDAG estimator. The TIA Guidelines indicate that the estimator should be “considered” for use,
but many other alternative approaches are suggested, and it is clear in the guidelines that the city is
supposed to work with the developer to come up with the most accurate method. Thus, it was neither
necessary nor appropriate to discard the actual traffic count data in favor of an estimate known to be
inaccurate for the existing conditions. I encourage you to read the entire Traffic Generation portion
(Section 5) of the TIA Guidelines (attached) to come to your own conclusions.
Response 3: Please refer to Response 1 regarding trip generation.
And that unnecessary and inappropriate decision has serious consequences, including the following:
• It reduces the traffic impact fee (TIF) to be collected from the developer by about $100,000,
because the TIF is tied to ADT.
Response 4: This comment claims that the amount collected for traffic impact fees (TIF) is based on
the project’s projection of ADT and assumes a reduction of $100,000 in fees without
providing a basis for the claim.
Trip generation rates (ADT) for calculation of the TIF are derived from Table 18.42.02 of
Carlsbad Municipal Code, Chapter 18.42, “Traffic Impact Fee” and is not based on the trip
generation presented in the project’s transportation analysis.
The TIF is calculated at the time of building permit application by applying the trip
generation rates for each land use associated with the project, per Table 18.42.02 of the
municipal code, to obtain the project’s ADT. The total ADT for each use (residential or
commercial) is then multiplied by the appropriate fee as prescribed in the code.
• Beyond the modest and highly dubious vehicle miles traveled (VMT) mitigation described in the
(EIR), the developer is only being required to add a trash can and bench to one bus stop (that
has almost no ridership), and a small bike rack and repair station in the project. These conditions
will not even come close to mitigating the over 2,000 ADT the project will add to the already
failing southbound El Camino Real facility.
Response 5: This comment incorrectly assumes that improvements to mitigate multi-modal level of
service (MMLOS) impacts are intended to mitigate project trip generation. In the Marja
Acres local mobility analysis, the offsite improvements (bench and trash can) are
prescribed mitigation measures, in accordance with the TIA Guidelines, to bring the
transit stop to an acceptable facility performance level. The onsite improvements (small
bike rack and repair station) are infrastructure transportation demand management
(TDM)measures that are coupled with programmatic TDM measures to meet TDM
requirements per General Plan Mobility Element Policy 3-P.11 as identified in the
project’s TDM plan. The project will also pay for the installation of one traffic signal
controller to meet TSM requirements associated with this policy. Above and beyond the
requirements of the TIA Guidelines, the project is providing dedicated right-turn lanes
into both of its access driveways.
In addition to the improvements identified through the local mobility analysis, the
project will provide features and mitigation to reduce VMT as outlined in Table 6-1 of
the Marja Acres Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis. For example, the project will provide a
subsidized ride-sharing program and subsidized transit passes for its residents and
employees, as well as strategic commute trip reduction marketing.
• It significantly under-estimates the number of vehicles that will be added to the El Camino Real
left turn lane at Kelly Drive, preventing the developer from being compelled to lengthen it to
mitigate the congestion and safety problems that will develop there. The length of the existing
turn lane is also over-stated by about 35 feet in the LMA (it includes most of the “taper” area
rather than just the full-width storage area), further contributing to this problem.
--
Response 6: Please refer to Response 1 regarding trip generation. Previous versions of the project’s
transportation analysis used the higher trip generation for turning movement evaluation.
Existing storage length for turn bays were found to be adequate. Use of a portion of the
“taper” area for queuing, where vehicles do not impact the through lane, is acceptable
for analysis.
• It under-estimates the number of vehicles that will be added to the already failing El Camino
Real/Cannon Road intersection, preventing the developer from being compelled to contribute to
the solution to that problem—the College Boulevard extension.
Response 7: The project is subject to implementation of TSM and TDM strategies per General Plan
Mobility Element Policy 3-P.11 regardless of which trip generation methodology was
used. The city does not require a contribution toward a mitigation fund for College Blvd
because the fund does not exist.
Another major issue in the Marja Acres TIA is the usage of a commercial land use in the neighboring
Robertson Ranch development to provide a significant “mixed-use” VMT reduction for Marja Acres. A
pattern is emerging in Carlsbad, in which mixed-use developments are proposed, and the developer is
given credit for that approach. But then the developer builds the residential portion first, and the
commercial portion sits vacant for a long time and is often eventually converted to residential. The
Marja Acres application raises this to a new level by claiming credit for a commercial mixed-use that is
not even in their development or under their control.
Further, it is my understanding under CEQA statutes and case law that areas that are “permitted” can be
assumed to be completed for the purposes of an environmental report, but areas that are not yet
permitted (hypotheticals) cannot be included. The Robertson Ranch site has sat unpermitted for several
years—and it may never be developed as a commercial site. Therefore, the mixed-use VMT credit taken
in the Marja Acres EIR appears to be inappropriate.
Response 8: The commercial site is contained in the approved Robertson Ranch Master Plan. The
Robertson Ranch project, including the commercial land uses is an approved and
reasonably foreseeable cumulative project and was analyzed as such in the EIR. Title 14,
section 15355(b) of the California Code of Regulations states “The cumulative impact
from several projects is the change in the environment which results from the
incremental impact of the project when added to other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Cumulative impacts can result
from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of
time.” Thus, it was appropriate for the Marja Acres environmental document to
consider all aspects of the Robertson Ranch project for impact and mitigation purposes.
At the very least, there should be accountability. For example, the Marja Acres developer could be
required to post a bond for a backup mitigation plan that they would recover only if the Robertson
Ranch commercial area actually gets built and the increased transit ridership cited in the EIR materializes
within a reasonable time.
Response 9: The Marja Acres project will not result in a significant transportation impact after the
implementation of proposed mitigation. CEQA does not mandate additional mitigations
beyond those required to mitigate the project’s impact below a level of significance.
Finally, the process has been very biased. The TIA in the original draft EIR deceptively claimed that the
project would have no significant impact on vehicle level of service (LOS) on El Camino Real. After I
pointed out that fatal flaw, staff allowed the developer to prematurely switch to a VMT approach to
assess vehicle impact. The developer was given special access to incomplete VMT methods and Growth
Management Plan traffic monitoring results that had never been reviewed by the T&MC or City Council,
despite repeated requests from me to see those items. They were also allowed to use a far more
beneficial VMT method (travel demand model run), even though their development did not meet the
criteria for that approach. And other developments that were under review and conducting their TIAs
concurrent with Marja Acres were allowed to continue to use the LOS method, because that benefitted
them.
Response 10: A LOS based analysis using methodologies to evaluate transportation impacts for CEQA
that were applicable at the time, to evaluate transportation impacts for CEQA, was
included in the Draft EIR. Methodologies in the TIA Guidelines were updated after the
release of the Draft EIR which required a complete revision to the project’s
transportation analysis. The project applicant discussed the options available, at that
time, with city staff and elected to evaluate the project’s transportation impacts
pursuant to a vehicle-miles-traveled (VMT) Based on methodologies that were updated
after the release of the draft EIR, the transportation analysis was required to be
revised. The project team decided to reevaluate the transportation impacts utilizing
VMT in accordance with CEQA. Prior to July 1, 2020, agencies were allowed to analyze
transportation impacts using either LOS or VMT. After the Recirculation DRAFT EIR was
released, the Marja Acres transportation impact analysis for CEQA was subsequently
revised to be consistent with the city’s later approved thresholds of significance and
the VMT Analysis Guidelines.
Staff relies on creative re-interpretations of the TIA Guidelines to decide what provisions they want to
follow and when. And they variously claim that they must follow or do not have to follow the TIA
Guidelines at all, depending on what is convenient or beneficial to developers for the particular time or
circumstance. This results in a series of illogical, self-contradictory statements, exemplified by the Marja
Acres EIR and LMA. While I understand the desire to assist developers in getting their projects approved,
there is also a duty to be unbiased, uniformly apply the rules, and act on behalf of the public in a
transparent way, as well.
Response 11: Please refer to Responses 1 and 2 regarding the project’s schedule as compared to
changes in the city’s analysis methodologies.
To be clear, I am not opposed to the Marja Acres project or any other specific development project. I am
only trying to fulfil my commitment as a member of the Traffic and Mobility Commission (T&MC)—to
enhance safe and efficient mobility in Carlsbad. But that means proactively anticipating future issues,
identifying necessary projects, and having funding available for those projects. And that necessitates
that staff abides by the rules, applies the rules uniformly to all projects, releases reliable TIAs, and
requires developers to pay their fair shares for their impacts. When that does not happen, as is the case
here, taxpayers will unnecessarily have to cover the costs.
I requested as part of our work plan that the T&MC be tapped to review the TIA portions of
development applications like this to assist the Planning Commission, which has to deal with many other
environmental components. Although it was acknowledged that was possible, it has not been done.
Therefore, I will continue providing my own analyses as an individual. While state laws restrict your
ability to completely reject many residential housing applications, those same state laws allow collection
of fair and reasonable fees to ensure that there is sufficient infrastructure to support the developments.
Consistent with these goals, I think the Planning Commission should ask these tough questions and
demand compliance before approving development applications.
1
October 16, 2020
Re: Marja Acres project (Letter 1 of 2): Development application review problems
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers (Cc: Planning Commission):
I am not opposed to the Marja Acres project, but there have been major issues during the application
review process that I want to highlight in this letter. Carlsbad’s Growth Management Plan (GMP),
General Plan, and Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines, in conjunction with sound
professional engineering judgement, are supposed to provide a logical process to generate accurate
data that ensures developers pay their fair shares for the impacts of their projects in a manner that is
transparent to the public.
However, I believe many of the review actions described below are inconsistent with the spirit and letter
of the governing documents and/or demonstrate poor engineering judgement and poor public policy.
This could frustrate Carlsbad residents and burden taxpayers when traffic worsens due to insufficient
proactive mitigation.
And I feel this is a general problem with the review process that needs to be addressed for the sake of
other current and future development applications. I also think it would be useful to have an audit
conducted on the review process to assess its fairness and compliance with the governing rules, and to
identify improvements that can be made.
I want to note that much of the information below is based on communications between staff, the
developer, the developer’s traffic consultant, and others, which I obtained through a public records
request. In a second letter, I plan to describe some specific issues with the current Marja Acres
environmental impact report (EIR) and associated documentation that I think should be addressed
before approving that specific project.
SUMMARY
Responses to comments are contained in the details section below
• Although the TIA Guidelines were published in April 2018 in response to a settlement
agreement, staff told the developer on multiple occasions during the process that
implementation of the guidelines was being delayed pending modifications.
• Despite the complexity of the Marja Acres traffic studies, and despite the fact that several
different studies were conducted between April 2018 and present, no TIA Scoping Agreement
was ever executed, as required by the TIA Guidelines. Such agreements provide transparency
and accountability by establishing upfront the methods to be used, but they are seemingly
never executed for any projects.
• Staff has made many different (often self-contradictory) interpretations of whether and how the
TIA Guidelines should be applied, depending on convenience and/or benefit. In some cases, they
2
have claimed they do not have to follow them at all. In another case, they have claimed that
they have to follow at least one provision to the letter. In many cases, there are creative
interpretations that do not seem to match the original intent.
• Staff shared with the developer that the TIA Guidelines, or selected provisions therein, do not
have to be followed, because they have never been brought to the City Council for approval.
• The traffic study in the original 4/15/2019 draft environmental impact report (DEIR) contained a
fatal flaw that masked the fact that the project would cause a level of service (LOS) failure on El
Camino Real, which I pointed out in comments.
• Rather than addressing the LOS problem, staff and the developer collected, and planned to
include in a revised EIR, new “supplemental” traffic counts collected in 6/2019 on El Camino
Real that were lower than the last two counts (11/2018 and 5/2019), in order to demonstrate
no impact under the GMP. In addition, in violation of the General Plan and TIA Guidelines, they
planned a switch to using the flawed old Carlsbad segment vehicle LOS method that produces all
“A” grades to demonstrate no impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
• A subsequent set of traffic counts collected in 9/2019 showed deficiencies on El Camino Real,
squashing these plans. Again, rather than addressing the LOS problem, they then switched to an
entirely new approach—vehicle miles traveled (VMT)—that allowed them to avoid LOS under
CEQA altogether. This, even though VMT methods had not been developed, and the application
was deemed complete long before the VMT rule change would go into effect.
• Staff provided early access to draft VMT methods as they were being developed, and a
recirculated DEIR with VMT analysis was completed and distributed for public review on
6/5/2020—well before the VMT Analysis Guidelines were finalized or the VMT switchover
became effective on 7/1/2020.
• In spite of the switch to VMT for CEQA purposes, the GMP still requires LOS analysis for vehicles
and transit in the project area as part of a local mobility analysis (LMA). However, for the transit
portion of the LMA, the only mitigation is a bench and trash can at one bus stop—and a bike
rack and repair area in the project.
• And for the vehicle portion of the LMA, there were new shenanigans. The LMA was withheld
until about 24 hours before the Planning Commission hearing, and there was a last-minute
manipulation of the trip generation portion, which artificially reduced the projected net new
traffic of the development from over 2,300 average daily trips (ADT) to just 901 ADT. That is a
ridiculously low number that could cost the city around $100,000 in lost traffic impact fees.
• The ADT reduction arose from a change in the way existing traffic was subtracted from the total
generated by the proeject. The 2,300+ ADT number was based on subtracting actual traffic
going to the existing businesses as determined by traffic counts at the driveways, while the 901
ADT number was based on subtracting artificial traffic calculated with an estimator tool.
• Staff made the trip generation method change despite emails that challenged it, pointing out
that the “existing [businesses] are old and underperforming,” that the driveway counts were
very recent, and that using the driveway count data “is a better approach.”
• Staff then falsely claimed to the Planning Commission that they were required to make the trip
generation method change based on the TIA Guidelines.
3
DETAILS
April 2018 TIA Guidelines and failure to execute TIA Scoping Agreements
On March 14, 2017, the City of Carlsbad executed a settlement agreement with an environmental group
that required—within one year—an update of Carlsbad’s TIA Guidelines to bring them into compliance
with the level of service (LOS) and transportation demand management (TDM) provisions in the 2015
General Plan Update.1 In April 2018, the TIA Guidelines update was published in satisfaction of that
agreement.2
On December 24, 2018, the application for the proposed Marja Acres project was deemed complete,
and on April 15, 2019, a draft environmental impact report (DEIR) with a traffic study was distributed for
public review.3 The TIA Guidelines require that TIA Scoping Agreements be executed between the city
and developers for such traffic studies, which define the methods and requirements of the study.4
However, no TIA Scoping Agreement had been executed. Later in 2019, there was a major shift in the
traffic study approach to a completely different set of methods, but, again no TIA Scoping Agreement
was executed, despite the complexity of this project.
I have requested the TIA Scoping Agreements for several other larger, ongoing development projects in
Carlsbad, but no responsive documents have been provided, indicating that staff does not do them. In
addition to being a violation of the TIA Guidelines, that approach is ripe for shenanigans and is poor
public policy. The troubling, years-long progression of the traffic studies done for the Marja Acres
project is an unfortunate example of this broken system, as I will now detail.
RESPONSE 1:
Scoping Agreements are submitted prior to initiating a transportation analysis. Marja Acres project
had submitted a transportation analysis (2016) prior to implementation of the TIA Guidelines (2018).
The intent of the scoping agreement, according to Section 3.1 of the TIA Guidelines, is to establish
the base input parameters, assumptions, and analysis methodologies for the transportation analysis.
Please note that the scoping agreement does not impact whether the project traffic analysis is in
conformance with the TIA Guidelines. Per Attachment A in the TIA Guidelines, the transportation
analysis that is identified in the scoping agreement may be subject to revision. Staff did not argue
that the project was not subject to the TIA Guidelines. Because a traffic analysis was under review
prior to the implementation of the TIA Guidelines, there was no purpose for a scoping agreement.
Scoping agreements were not requested or required for projects that were in progress before the
TIA Guidelines were implemented. However, scoping is required for projects initiated after the
release of the TIA Guidelines. There were two projects initiated after the release of the guidelines
that submitted a TIA without submitting a scoping agreement to staff for review. Comments on the
methodologies in the TIA were provided via the submittal process, and the projects were required to
update their study area and analyses to be consistent with the requirements of the guidelines.
Selective enforcement of TIA Guidelines and associated rules and methods
4
Despite the fact that the new rules/guidelines should have been developed and in effect concurrent
with adoption of the General Plan Update in 2015, and despite the fact that the city spent a year
updating the TIA Guidelines after the settlement agreement was executed, city staff informed the Marja
Acres developer (the applicant) on multiple occasions through at least September 2018 that
implementation of the TIA Guidelines was being further delayed pending more modifications.5
RESPONSE 2:
This statement is incorrect. As a courtesy Staff informed the project applicant that there are pending
changes to the TIA Guidelines, however they were still subject to the current version of the TIA
Guidelines.
For the Marja Acres application (and others), staff has had many different (often self-contradictory)
interpretations of whether and how the TIA Guidelines should be applied, depending on the context.
For example, when I have asked about the lack of execution of formal TIA Scoping Agreements, staff has
cited a section of the TIA guidelines that describes the use of phone calls and emails as a substitute,6 but
those are only a substitute for an in-person meeting to guide the creation of a TIA Scoping Agreement—
not a substitute for the agreement itself.
RESPONSE 3:
Although the TIA Guidelines provide an example form for a scoping agreement, the scoping of the
project transportation analysis can be memorialized through any written form. The TIA Guidelines do
not specify a format.
Then, in their response to my public comment on the Marja Acres DEIR, staff argued that the TIA
Guidelines did not have to be followed at all, because they were not in effect when the project TIA was
submitted.7 It should be noted here that the TIA Guidelines went into effect in April 2018, the traffic
counts included in the first published Marja Acres TIA (April 15, 2019 DEIR) were not collected until
November 2018, and the entire TIA approach was completely revised again in late 2019, so this is a
ridiculous argument.
REPSONSE 4:
This comment misconstrues the referenced statement. The statement referenced is a response
specifically addressing the scoping agreement only. This statement does not say that the “TIA
Guidelines did not have to be followed at all.” Please see the referenced statement below.
1 Carlsbad City Council Resolution No. 2017-044 (North County Advocates Settlement Agreement, 3/14/2017):
http://edocs.carlsbadca.gov/HPRMWebDrawer/RecordHTML/467762 2 Carlsbad TIA Guidelines (April 2018):
https://cityadmin.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=22758 3 State of California Clearinghouse CEQAnet Web Portal entry for the original (April 2019) Marja Acres DEIR:
https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2018041022/2 4 One of the main objectives of the TIA Guidelines is to create a framework for creation of Scoping Agreements. In
particular, see Section 3 and the Scoping Agreement template in the appendix. 5 E.g., 6/21/2018 and 9/24/2018 emails between city staff, the developer, and their traffic consultant.
5
Response provided in draft EIR: “The city's Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines had not
been released and were not in effect at the time the project TIA was submitted for review.
Therefore, a scoping agreement was not required.”
Staff also shared with the Marja Acres developer that it can be argued that the TIA Guidelines, or
selected provisions of the guidelines do not have to be followed, because the City Council has never
formally approved them.8 I have heard this “theory” elsewhere, as well. It should be noted, ironically,
that staff has chosen never to bring the guidelines to council for approval, likely to allow them to
selectively enforce them and make changes at will. Hopefully, that will change with the recent priority to
have the Traffic and Mobility Commission (T&MC) conduct an external review and have council approve
them.
RESPONSE The commenter has misconstrued the facts surrounding the local mobility analysis and CEQA
transportation impact analysis along with misstating staff’s direction to the project applicant. The
project was required to follow the TIA Guidelines. The TIA Guidelines establish requirements for local
mobility analysis including GMP performance standards. Thresholds of significance for CEQA LOS
analysis were established in the SANTEC/ITE Guidelines and were applicable to the project at the time
the draft EIR was prepared.
The project team decided to reevaluate the transportation impacts utilizing VMT in accordance with
CEQA. Prior to July 1, 2020, agencies were allowed to analyze transportation impacts using either LOS
or VMT. After the Recirculation DRAFT EIR was released, the Marja Acres transportation impact
analysis for CEQA was subsequently revised to be consistent with the city’s later approved thresholds
of significance and the VMT Analysis Guidelines.
Below is the referenced statement: “The City has provided clarification that the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (April 2018) are currently only approved for the evaluation of potential impacts associated with the City’s Growth Management Plan (GMP). The Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines have not been approved for use by the City Council for purposes of evaluating potential impacts to intersections and segments for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)."
And now, in complete contradiction to the above arguments, staff is arguing that they have to follow the
TIA Guidelines—at least for one alleged provision that allows them to artificially make a huge reduction
in the amount of traffic generated by the Marja Acres project. This is also a flawed argument, as detailed
below, but this all demonstrates the extreme inconsistency and bias in the process.9
RESPONSE 6:
There is no “contradiction” as staff has been consistent in applying the TIA Guidelines to all projects subject to a transportation analysis. See Response 16 regarding trip generation.
6
Meanwhile, staff has been tinkering for several years with other methods and tools, such as the
multimodal level of service (MMLOS) tools, which are supposed to define the service requirements for
pedestrian, bicycle, and transit modes of travel. The clear intent of the tinkering is not to improve
conditions for those modes of travel, but rather to avoid having to report performance failures by the
city or developers. Transportation Department staff recently committed to having the T&MC participate
in a review of the MMLOS tools, and hopefully a better strategy can be agreed upon going forward.
RESPONSE 7:
This statement does not pertain to the project and is a general statement about transportation analysis
requirements.
Fatally flawed traffic study in the original April 15, 2019 Marja Acres DEIR
The Marja Acres project is adjacent to a portion of El Camino on which vehicle traffic is much heavier in
one direction, depending on the time of day (nearly an 80%/20% split). And, due to the center median,
all traffic going in and out of the project must occur in the southbound (actually eastbound in that
specific area) direction. To accurately reflect congestion, the TIA Guidelines require separate assessment
of traffic in each direction.
In November 2018, consistent with the TIA Guidelines, the applicant’s traffic consultant collected
separate traffic counts in each direction on El Camino Real between Tamarack Avenue and Cannon
Road. However, when they prepared their TIA, they effectively combined the traffic volumes in both
directions and assumed a ~50%/50% split (bidirectional assessment), leading to the incorrect conclusion
that the project would not have a significant impact on congestion.10
In a pair of May 2019 public comments on the DEIR, I detailed this fatal flaw in the traffic study and
provided evidence that the project actually would cause southbound El Camino Real to become
deficient under the Growth Management Plan (GMP) by causing it to transition from LOS D to E/F.11
In emails I obtained recently through a public records request, I discovered that there was an
acknowledgment at the time that the bidirectional assessment method was, indeed, flawed.12 A draft
response to my comment from the applicant’s traffic consultant dated August 5, 2019 included the
following statement:
[T]he TIA erroneously used the City’s published ‘bidirectional capacity’ from Table 2 of the
Roadway Capacity Tables Report (Capacity Report), instead of the ‘directional capacity’ from
Table 1 of that same report.13
6 E.g., 7/10/2020 email from staff to me 7 See the response to comment IND-R1.12 in the Marja Acres final EIR 8 E.g., see the draft of the applicant’s traffic consultant’s responses to my public comments in an 8/5/2019 email to
staff 9 Staff testimony at the 9/16/2020 Planning Commission public hearing on Marja Acres
Engineers, August 5, 2019
5
This TIA was produced by professional traffic engineers contracted by the applicant and was presumably
reviewed by city traffic engineering staff, but it was included in the DEIR despite the fatal flaw. I was not
sure whether this was a purposeful mistake to avoid having to show a significant traffic impact, or just a
serious error. Based on the email exchanges I have now seen, I will give the benefit of the doubt and
conclude it was just an error.
That said, the above acknowledgment of the error was never made public, and the series of events it
triggered (described below) are very troubling—with no more benefit of the doubt to be provided.
RESPONSE 8:
Based on updates to methodologies for evaluating vehicular impacts for both the GMP and for
CEQA, the analysis presented in the draft EIR was required to be revised. The analysis presented in
the final Local Mobility Analysis is consistent with updated methodologies provided by the
Transportation Department.
Plan to change the conclusions of the traffic study with questionable new traffic counts
Instead of having the applicant acknowledge that its project would cause El Camino Real to become
deficient, staff worked with the applicant to collect new traffic counts to replace the counts that
resulted in the deficiency.14 They collected what they called “supplemental” traffic counts on El Camino
Real between Tamarack Avenue and Cannon Road in June 2019, which were lower than the ones they
had originally collected in November 2018, and they were low enough that they could suggest the
project would not cause the deficiency on southbound El Camino Real.
Staff directed the applicant’s traffic consultant to use the new traffic counts and call the November 2018
counts an “anomaly.” They also devised a new scheme (not described in the TIA Guidelines) to average
various combinations of multiple counts along the El Camino Real corridor.15 Staff’s directives were
reinforced through multiple rounds of editing and staff review of draft responses to my comments
throughout July and August of 2019, with the intent of incorporating the new data into a revised EIR.16
10 April 15, 2019 Marja Acres DEIR 11 Available as letters IND-21 and IND-49 in the final EIR:
https://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=45676 12 E.g., 5/28/2019 and 5/29/2019 emails from city staff to the applicant’s traffic consultant 13 Marja Acres Draft Responses to Comments on March 26, 2019 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), LLG,
7
Notably, though, the city had collected other traffic counts in that area of El Camino Real in May 2019—
just a month before the June 2019 “supplemental” counts—as part of the annual traffic monitoring
program. Those May 2019 counts were even higher than the November 2018 counts, but those were
not taken into consideration or planned for inclusion in the revised EIR. Eventually, additional counts
done in September 2019 were similarly high to the November 2018 and May 2019 counts,
demonstrating that the June 2019 “supplemental” counts were the “anomaly.”
The whole strategy of doing “supplemental” traffic counts and cherry-picking the lowest ones with some
sort of averaging scheme to get a desired result is very troubling. It represents poor engineering
judgement and poor public policy.
RESPONSE 9:
Initial traffic counts collected by the applicant were inconsistent with the results of the city’s
monitoring program at that time. Staff from the Transportation Department, Community
Development Department and the project applicant agreed that the project should conduct additional
traffic counts to determine why the original counts were inconsistent with the city’s counts. Traffic
counts used in the final analysis represented the highest volumes collected by the applicant and
therefore provide the most conservative analysis.
The commenter references averaging traffic counts along individual segments within a corridor to
determine the traffic volume associated with the corridor. This methodology is consistent with the
Highway Capacity Manual and direction from the Transportation Department.
Plan to use the misleading old Carlsbad street segment LOS methods for CEQA purposes
It is equally troubling that staff emails also reveal that, after the fatal flaw was demonstrated in the DEIR
traffic study, they also directed the applicant to change to the old invalid Carlsbad street segment LOS
method to assess the traffic impacts of the project for CEQA purposes.17
As I have described previously, staff concocted and used the old invalid vehicle LOS method from 1989
through about 2018. It vastly under-reported congestion, returning LOS “A” grades for virtually every
street facility in Carlsbad, no matter how congested they were. True to form, in the draft data tables
produced in the July/August 2019 timeframe for Marja Acres, the use of that method resulted in every
street facility passing with LOS “A” grades, even though the valid methods were returning LOS “D” and
“F” grades for the same facilities using the same traffic counts.
14 E.g., 6/12/2019 email from the applicant to city staff and the applicant’s traffic consultant
15 Marja Acres Draft Responses to Comments on March 26, 2019 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), LLG,
Engineers, August 5, 2019 16 E.g., 8/15/2019, 8/19/2019, 8/20/2019, 8/21/2019, 8/22/2019 emails between city staff, the applicant, and the
applicant’s traffic consultant, including attached drafts of responses to my comments and guidance from staff 17 Marja Acres Draft Responses to Comments on March 26, 2019 Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA), LLG,
8
The use of the old Carlsbad method was supposed to end with the 2015 General Plan Update, which
requires use of a valid method based on the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Also, the TIA Guidelines
clearly state that the HCM-based methods described therein are to be used for CEQA analyses.18 Despite
that, staff’s directive was reinforced through multiple rounds of editing and staff review of draft data
tables and draft responses to my comments throughout July and August of 2019, with the intent of
incorporating the results into a revised EIR.19The attempted resurrection of the flawed old Carlsbad
method for the Marja Acres project represents poor engineering judgement and poor public policy.
RESPONSE 10:
The methods that were used to evaluate transportation impacts for CEQA using LOS were based on
the current Highway Capacity Manual.
Please see Response 5 regarding applicable methodologies for CEQA transportation impact analysis.
New September 2019 traffic counts
On September 16-20, 2019, the city collected yet another series of traffic counts on El Camino Real
between Tamarack Avenue and Cannon Road, ostensibly for the annual traffic monitoring program.
However, they were unusual in that the counts spanned a five-day period (rather than the usual two or
three days), and they were collected at three different locations within the segment. So, they were
clearly done with the Marja Acres project in mind.
In any event, those counts confirmed the reliability of the November 2018 and May 2019 counts (and
the unreliability of the supplemental June 2019 counts), and indicated deficiency of southbound El
Camino Real. A subsequent series of meetings between staff, the applicant, and the applicant’s
contractors in late September 2019 led to the abandonment of the scheme to use the June 2019 traffic
counts and the old Carlsbad LOS method for CEQA purposes. However, many man-hours over multiple
months were spent on those endeavors before they were abandoned.
RESPONSE 11:
The final local mobility analysis used the counts collected in November 2018 and were the highest
traffic volumes collected by the applicant. The commenter seems to agree that those were the
appropriate traffic counts to be used in the local mobility analysis.
Premature switch to vehicle miles traveled (VMT) approach for CEQA purposes
So, there was again an opportunity to do the vehicle LOS study in the correct way and agree to provide
full mitigation through street projects and/or TSM and TDM initiatives. Instead, a new approach was
agreed upon—to entirely avoid doing vehicle LOS analysis for CEQA by prematurely switching to a VMT-
based approach for the Marja Acres project. That decision was made long before Carlsbad had any
guidelines on how to conduct VMT analysis, let alone the July 1, 2020 effective date of the rule change.
And this huge change in the study approach was made again without a formal TIA Scoping Agreement,
as required by the TIA Guidelines. I do not yet have full transparency on this phase of the project,
9
because staff did not provide any communications in response to my public records request in the six-
month period between September 30, 2019 and April 1, 2020.20
18 First section of the TIA Guidelines: “The Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines provide a detailed description
of the methodology to be followed in identifying project impacts for applicable transportation facilities in
compliance with applicable federal, state and local requirements (e.g., CEQA, GMP and the 2015 General Plan
Mobility Element).” 19 E.g., 8/15/2019, 8/19/2019, 8/20/2019, 8/21/2019, 8/22/2019 emails between city staff, the applicant, and the applicant’s traffic consultant, including attached drafts of responses to my comments and guidance from staff 20I submitted a new public records request to fill the six-month gap, but on 10/15/2020 staff invoked an extension
beyond the 10-day response period.
10
The Marja Acres project was given special access to early drafts of the VMT Analysis Guidelines and was
conducting its VMT analysis as those guidelines were being developed—before they were made
available for review by the public, T&MC, or council. The VMT analysis was allegedly done based on a
March 2020 draft of the guidelines, which underwent multiple subsequent revisions. And the Marja
Acres recirculated DEIR (RDEIR) that contained the new VMT analysis had a review period that began on
June 5, 2020,21 before the VMT rule and guidelines were even adopted by council or took effect on July
1, 2020.22
There was another development doing a traffic study in the same timeframe, and it was more beneficial
for them to do LOS analysis rather than VMT. Thus, it is notable that staff stated at the July 15, 2020
public hearing for that development that its application “was deemed complete in October of 2018,”
that the switchover to VMT did not take effect until July 1, 2020, and that the city must “apply…the
standards that were in place when the application is deemed complete.” Counsel added that this must
be done for “fairness and propriety” to the developer. Commissioner Luna also made an impassioned
statement that, in fairness to the developer, the rules in place at that time had to be followed, which
was subsequently echoed by other commissioners.23
Fair enough, but in the case of Marja Acres, which benefits from VMT analysis, staff hypocritically cited
an agency’s ability to decide on a “project-by-project basis” to use the VMT standard,24 regardless of the
fact that the LOS standard was in place when the application was deemed complete on December 24,
2018, and regardless of the fact that the VMT Analysis Guidelines had not been finalized, let along gone
into effect.
RESPONSE 12:
A LOS based analysis using methodologies to evaluate transportation impacts for CEQA, that were
applicable at the time, was included in the Draft EIR. Transportation methodologies were updated after
the release of the Draft EIR, which required a complete revision to the project’s transportation analysis.
The project applicant discussed the options available, at that time, with city staff and elected to evaluate
the project’s transportation impacts pursuant to a vehicle-miles-traveled (VMT). The project team decided to reevaluate the transportation impacts utilizing VMT in accordance with CEQA. Prior to July 1,
2020, agencies were allowed to analyze transportation impacts using either LOS or VMT. After the
Recirculation DRAFT EIR was released, the Marja Acres transportation impact analysis for CEQA was
subsequently revised to be consistent with the city’s later approved thresholds of significance and the
VMT Analysis Guidelines.
Last-minute manipulation of LMA could cost city $100,000
Ultimately, I believe the types and the target levels of the mitigation being proposed to satisfy the CEQA
requirement will do little to mitigate the actual traffic impacts in the area. However, in addition to the
CEQA/VMT analysis, Carlsbad also still requires mobility analysis under the GMP, General Plan, and TIA
Guidelines in the form of an LMA, providing an additional opportunity for mitigation—in the case of
Marja Acres, focused on vehicles and transit (based on street typologies).
11
The GMP-based LMA should have been made available for review at the same time as the CEQA-based
VMT study in the EIR, because there are overlapping components and intertwined mitigation
strategies—and I requested as much. However, the Marja Acres LMA was actively undergoing changes
almost right up to the September 16, 2020 Planning Commission public hearing, and I was not provided
a copy until about 24 hours in advance of that meeting, so there was little opportunity for reasonable
public review.
RESPONSE 13:
The Local Mobility Analysis (LMA) is not a CEQA document since under VMT analysis LOS is no longer
used to determine significant impacts under CEQA. For this reason, the LMA is a project technical
analysis and was not and would not have been included in the Recirculated Draft EIR. It is true that
minor revisions continued to be made to the LMA at city engineering staff’s request but were
completed prior to completion of the staff report and did not alter staff’s recommendations or
analysis of the project. Staff does not attach extraneous technical studies to Planning Commission
staff reports. The LMA was scanned and provided to the commenter at the project planner’s earliest
opportunity after receiving the request.
21 State of California Clearinghouse CEQAnet Web Portal entry for the Marja Acres RDEIR:
https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2018041022/3 22 Carlsbad City Council Resolution No. 2020-114 (VMT Analysis Guidelines adoption): http://edocs.carlsbadca.gov/HPRMWebDrawer/RecordHTML/577938 23 7/15/2020 Carlsbad Planning Commission video: (https://carlsbadca.swagit.com/play/07152020-1315) (Item #1) 24 Response to public comment IND-R1.11i in the Marja Acres final EIR: https://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=45676
12
I was hoping that the LMA would provide meaningful additional traffic mitigation. Instead, it largely just
cites the VMT-based mitigation plan in the EIR, and then adds a bench and trash can at one bus stop,
and a bicycle rack and repair area in the project.
RESPONSE 14:
In the Marja Acres local mobility analysis, the offsite improvements (bench and trash can) are prescribed
mitigation measures, in accordance with the TIA Guidelines, to bring the transit stop to an acceptable
facility performance level. The onsite improvements (small bike rack and repair station) are
infrastructure transportation demand management (TDM) measures that are coupled with
programmatic TDM measures to meet TDM requirements per General Plan Mobility Element Policy 3-
P.11 as identified in the project’s TDM plan. The project will also pay for the installation of one traffic
signal controller to meet TSM requirements associated with this policy. Above and beyond the
requirements of the TIA Guidelines, the project is providing dedicated right-turn lanes into both of its
access driveways.
In addition to the improvements identified through the local mobility analysis, the project will provide
features and mitigation to reduce VMT as outlined in Table 6-1 of the Marja Acres Vehicle Miles Traveled
Analysis. For example, the project will provide a subsidized ride-sharing program and subsidized transit
passes for its residents and employees, as well as strategic commute trip reduction marketing.
Sadly, still more serious shenanigans were done in the LMA in the form of a substantial last-minute
reduction in the project’s predicted net average daily vehicle trips (ADT), which will likely reduce the
traffic impact fee owed to the city by about $100,000.
RESPONSE 15:
This comment claims that the amount collected for traffic impact fees (TIF) is based on the project’s
projection of ADT and assumes a reduction of $100,000 in fees without providing a basis for the claim.
Trip generation rates (ADT) for calculation of the TIF are derived from Table 18.42.02 of Carlsbad
Municipal Code, Chapter 18.42, “Traffic Impact Fee” and is not based on the trip generation presented in
the project’s transportation analysis.
The TIF is calculated at the time of building permit application by applying the trip generation rates for
each land use associated with the project, per Table 18.42.02 of the municipal code, to obtain the
project’s ADT. The total ADT for each use (residential or commercial) is then multiplied by the
appropriate fee as prescribed in the code.
The final EIR for the Marja Acres project released on 8/26/2020 states (Appendix J, Section 3.2):
With redevelopment of the site, the Project is calculated to generate 2,366 net new ADT per the
GMP/LMA prepared by LLG in August 2020…
In response to my public comment on the EIR (IND-R1.26 in the final EIR), staff stated that “the project
would result in 2,334 ADT. And Table 14 in the Planning Commission staff report released 9/10/2020
also refers to a net increase of 2,334 ADT.
The small discrepancy in those ADT is yet another traffic study error, and it is important to note that
13
every one of the dozens of previous draft and final traffic studies produced between 2016 and August
2020 had estimated trip generation of well over 2,000 ADT. However, the trip generation method was
changed in the days leading up to the 9/16/2020 Planning Commission meeting, which reduced it to just
901 ADT, and an erratum was prepared to “correct the outdated data.”
This change was driven by an artificial increase in the number of trips subtracted from the gross ADT
based on existing traffic at the project site, which will disappear when the current businesses are
demolished. The 2,366 net ADT figure is based on a 700 ADT reduction for the current businesses, which
was based on actual traffic counts at the business driveways. However, the last-minute change to 901
net ADT is based on a 2,133 ADT reduction for the current businesses, which was calculated from a
SANDAG estimator tool.
Email exchanges in late August and early September 2020 about this change in the trip generation
method show that there was pushback, in that it was pointed out that the “existing [businesses] are old
and underperforming,” that the driveway counts were very recent, and that using the driveway count
data “is a better approach.” But staff ignored that sound engineering judgement and directed the last-
minute switch to the estimation method that they knew was overestimating current traffic by more than
three-fold, thereby reducing net ADT by nearly 1,500 ADT—potentially costing the city around $100,000
in impact fees.
During the 9/16/2020 Planning Commission public hearing, staff rejected my claim that this was a
shenanigan. They (ironically) claimed that they were bound by the TIA Guidelines to use the SANDAG
estimator. But that claim is just more shenanigans. The guidelines do not require the use of the SANDAG
estimator. They indicate that the estimator should be “considered” for use, but other alternative
approaches are suggested, and it is clear in the guidelines that the city is supposed to work with the
developer to come up with the most accurate method.
Thus, it was neither necessary nor appropriate to discard the actual traffic count data in favor of an
estimate. I encourage you to read the entire Traffic Generation portion (Section 5) of the TIA Guidelines
to come to your own conclusions. This represents poor engineering judgement and poor public policy.
RESPONSE 16:
This comment questions the validity of how the net trip generation from the proposed project is
calculated. Generally, net trips are the difference between the proposed project trips and the trips
generated by existing uses on the site.
The Marja Acres project application, including the draft transportation analysis, was submitted in 2016, well before the introduction of the city’s Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines in 2018 that contains
specific methodologies for calculation of trip generation. The project did initially use traffic counts
measured at the driveway to estimate existing trip generation. This methodology represents a single
snapshot in time of the number of trips. There may be many factors that affect the number of trips
measured at the time of the counts such as retail occupancy, time of year, roadway construction, and
redistribution of traffic due to congestion or collisions.
14
After the implementation of the TIA Guidelines, the project was required to update the transportation
analysis to meet the requirements of the Guidelines. The process to update the project’s transportation
analysis to be consistent with the TIA Guidelines required several iterations of review and comments
from staff. The method for traffic generation is prescribed in the TIA Guidelines and the project traffic
analysis applied the appropriate trip generation methodology.
Methodologies to be used for trip generation calculation are prescribed Section 5, “Traffic Generation,”
of the TIA Guidelines. The trip generation for both the proposed and existing use on the Marja Acres site
were derived from the SANDAG “(Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates For the San
Diego Region” in accordance with the TIA Guidelines. The TIA Guidelines recommend use of SANDAG
trip generation rates when available. If SANDAG rates are not available, the guidelines outline other methodologies that may be considered. Collection of driveway counts at a single site is not consistent
with the prescribed options in the guidelines. The trip generation rates for a land use provided in
SANDAG’s Not So Brief Guide are based on empirical data from several comparable sites in the San
Diego region or on other reports and studies. Best practice for evaluating trip generation for a site
involves using typical trip generation rates for a particular land use, rather than data associated with a
single site. This ensures that trip generation is based on vetted empirical data, is consistent with
previous entitlements for the site, and is not founded on a particular set of tenants or traffic conditions,
which are subject to fluctuation.
The proposed project’s trip generation is 3,034 ADT and the existing uses produce 2,133 ADT based on
SANDAG trip generation rates. The net trip generation (3,034 – 2,133) is 901 ADT. The driveway counts
taken in 2017 resulted in 700 ADT, which was only an estimate of daily trips based on counts collected
during peak hours. As previously discussed, driveway counts are subject to fluctuation given certain circumstances at the time of measurement. The net trip generation using the driveway counts (3,034 –
700) is 2,334 ADT.
Last-minute manipulation of trip generation numbers invalidates LMA
“Trip generation” is one of the first steps in a traffic study, and all of the subsequent steps rely on its
accuracy. Obviously, the artificial reduction from 2,300+ ADT to 901 ADT also artificially reduces all of
the traffic projected to be added to the streets, so any impacts on congestion, turn lanes, etc. will be
under-estimated.
RESPONSE 17:
The trip generation has been evaluated appropriately and the basis has been detailed above (Response
16). Further, no impacts to congestion or turn lanes were identified in prior analysis based on the
previously stated net trip generation of 2,334 ADT. Therefore, no impacts were under-estimated.
Sincerely,
Steve Linke
Carlsbad, CA
From:Council Internet Email
Cc:Don Neu; Teri Delcamp; Melissa Flores
Subject:FW: Marja Acres
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 12:37:39 PM
From: Robyn Lass <coopernkaya@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:56 AM
To: City Clerk <Clerk@carlsbadca.gov>; Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: Marja Acres
Hello,
Please reconsider the Marja Acres development in Carlsbad. Adding additional new, luxury homes in
our area is not good for residents as it will increase traffic and strain our already stretched
community resources. It is detrimental to the environment, creating more pollution, reducing our
already minimal open space and vegetative areas, and it will increase light and noise pollution in
Carlsbad. Finally, it will force long time businesses, like our beloved neighborhood Bobby's
Restaurant, to disappear, erasing one more piece of our unique Carlsbad culture.
Please do not allow developers to continue to punish our residents. Please stop this development.
Sincerely,
Robyn Lass
Carlsbad Resident
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
From:Council Internet Email
Cc:Don Neu; Melissa Flores
Subject:FW: Marja Acres hearing 11/3/20
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 12:41:28 PM
-----Original Message-----
From: J Cannon <blancofelis@earthlink.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 11:30 AM
To: City Clerk <Clerk@carlsbadca.gov>; Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Cc: Teri Delcamp <Teri.Delcamp@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: Marja Acres hearing 11/3/20
Council, Mayor, and City Planning Department—
Recently I received via USPS a notice that the City of Carlsbad is holding this hearing, 11/3/20, suggesting that an
exemption to recently revised traffic capacity guidelines (Thank you, Traffic Commissioner Steve Linke) be shunted
aside to allow the Marja Acres development to move forward with its high density condo project.
In this case, the stretch of El Camino Real between Cannon Road and Tamarack Avenue is already at or beyond the
City’s designated traffic congestion threshold.
What is the use of asking the citizenry about its concerns about increasingly congested traffic corridors when you
are in fact creating a process which undermines all efforts to address this problem?
Please do not allow this or any other exemption to accepted traffic capacity guidelines to be passed, as it sends a
message to opportunistic, hit-and-run developers that Carlsbad’s rules and laws really don’t mean anything.
It also sends a message to the community that our pleas for intelligent planning that balances commerce with quality
of life are being willfully ignored.
Carlsbad is like a beautiful woman. She can pick and choose suitors who have her best interests at heart, and can
send bad actors packing. Show the world that she is not a floozy for just any old sweet talker lighting a cigar with a
C-note.
Respectfully,
Janell Cannon
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
From:Barbara Wood
To:City Clerk; Council Internet Email
Subject:Marja Acres Development
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 1:35:30 PM
As a 37 years’ resident of the NW quadrant of Carlsbad, I am deeply concerned about the proposed development of
Marja Acres. I am not specifically opposed to the development if it follows the Carlsbad General Plan, but it
appears that a developer is proposing to bypass the General Plan that allows a maximum of 195 dwelling units on
the 13 acres, and will instead squeeze in 296 units. My information is that the developer will attempt to utilize
California State Mandates to circumvent the Carlsbad General Plan. My opposition is obvious: more traffic
congestion on a major highway (El Camino Real), and a strain on local schools and city services.
But, more importantly, if this development is approved and the Carlsbad General Plan is ignored, it sets a precedent
that will be to the detriment of Carlsbad residents. When the General Plan (Growth Management Plan?) was
adopted and approved by our city leaders and citizens, it was with the intention and purpose to not exclude people
from purchasing homes in Carlsbad, but to limit population growth so that our city could be properly managed to
provide a safe environment and to avoid overcrowding which would impact the safety, peace and enjoyment of
property owners and merchants. It is a good plan and has kept Carlsbad a very unique and desirable city for those
fortunate to be able to purchase property or engage in a business. Not to say that we are shutting out future potential
buyers as with most of the country, we are becoming an aging population and properties will pass or become
available as time moves on.
I implore each of you to consider the long term impact of this “alternative development” and reject the proposal as
submitted that will be presented to City Council on November 3. As I recall the objective of the General Plan is to
provide a well governed and planned community that serves all of its present and future citizens.
Respectfully submitted,
Barbara Wood
Carlsbad, CA 92010
bwood@roadrunner.com
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
From:Dolkas, Jennifer
To:City Clerk; Council Internet Email
Subject:Marja Acres project
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 1:12:07 PM
Dear Council members and city clerk,The development at Marja Acres will cause more problems on El Camino Real. The road will not beable to handle that many cars. Please do not let this development circumvent our Carlsbad GeneralPlan. Our streets, schools and city services will be strained. Please don't allow concessions or
waivers in regards to development standards. We have a Carlsbad General Plan. Please follow it.Please follow opinions and guidance of our residents and not the developers as it is us who live hereand vote here.Thanks for listening,
Jenny Dolkas and Scott Southerland (Carlsbad residents for 45 years)
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
From:Therese Dolkas
To:City Clerk; Council Internet Email
Subject:Marja Acres project
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:29:32 AM
Dear Council members and city clerk,
The development at Marja Acres will cause more problems on El Camino Real. The road will not be able to handle
that many cars. Please do not let this development circumvent our Carlsbad General Plan. Our streets, schools and
city services will be strained. Please don't allow concessions or waivers in regards to development standards. We
have a Carlsbad General Plan. Please follow it.
Thanks, Therese and Steve Dolkas (Carlsbad residents for 46 years)
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
From:Priya Bhat-Patel
To:City Clerk
Subject:Fwd: Toxaphene
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 2:38:38 PM
For Marja Acres
Priya Bhat-Patel
Council Member, District 3City of Carlsbad1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.Carlsbad, CA 92008
www.carlsbadca.gov
760-434-2830 (o)| 760-473-8726 (c)
priya.bhat-patel@carlsbadca.gov
Begin forwarded message:
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Kris Wright <kriswrt222@gmail.com<mailto:kriswrt222@gmail.com>>Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2020Subject: Toxaphene
Hi Priya,I've attached a letter that I received from a neighbor with the findings thattoxaphene was found at Robertson Ranch in excess of Cal-EPA levels.
Also attached is the rendering from the Plans submitted by the developer showingthat they plan on only allowing a 3ft easement before the downward gradingoccurs (at the property line). According to the Manual that both the City projectengineer and I saw, that easement should be between 4 to 5ft from the propertyline (border to our properties), not 3ft.
Thanks,Kris
--Kris Wrightkriswrt222@gmail.com<mailto:kriswrt222@gmail.com>
--Priya Bhat-PatelCarlsbad Council Member, District 3Community | Health | Transparencypriya@priyabhatpatel.com<mailto:priya@priyabhatpatel.com>
www.PriyaForCarlsbad.com<http://www.priyaforcarlsbad.com/>Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/priyabhatpatelforcarlsbad/> |
Twitter<https://www.twitter.com/priyabhatpatel> |Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/priyabhatpatel>
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize thesender and know the content is safe.
IIRlllRll
From:Priya Bhat-Patel
To:City Clerk
Subject:Re Marja Acres
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 2:35:35 PM
Attachments:Marja Acres Final EIR - Comment Letter.pdf
Rich_Funderburk Marja Acres DEIR Comments05292019.pdf
Priya Bhat-Patel
Council Member, District 3City of Carlsbad1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.Carlsbad, CA 92008
www.carlsbadca.gov
760-434-2830 (o)| 760-473-8726 (c)
priya.bhat-patel@carlsbadca.gov
Begin forwarded message:
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Kris Wright <kriswrt222@gmail.com<mailto:kriswrt222@gmail.com>>Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2020Subject: Today's telephone conversationTo: , Kris Wright <kriswrt222@gmail.com<mailto:kriswrt222@gmail.com>>
Hi Priya,Thank you for agreeing to speak with me for twenty minutes today. I am lookingforward to our conversation.
Since the meeting is longer than the normal time you give to the public-I want tothank you also for agreeing to an extended time. And while I'm thanking you, Iappreciate you listening to my neighbor Jennifer Rich who has worked for Cal-EPA for the past 27 years.I wanted to follow up with that conversation and provide you with some furthercommunication and research.
1. As mentioned in our previous conference call, Jen was in communication withstaff about her findings. She had written to the Planning Commission with herconcerns, which is the only way to respond to the final comments in the EIRwhich answers questions to the public. Her letter to the Planning Commission isattached here.She mentions that the site was not characterized properly according to the Dept.of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) in that it was strongly recommended that 30samples (instead of 20 samples) should have been obtained an analyzed, and thatspecific known sites containing storage tanks were never characterized. She
stated that since lead paint was used during the farming (in the EIR stating circa1953) that lead samples from buildings built before 1978 needed to be analyzed.
This is a summary from her letter to the Planning Commission:
* Only 20 soil borings were taken over the 20+ acre project site, even though
the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Interim Guidance forSampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision) dated August 7, 2008
recommends 30 borings. Please note that the Response to Comments on the FinalEIR cite the 2008 DTSC Interim Guidance in regards to the soil sampling
methodology utilized at the project site.
* No biased, discrete sampling was conducted in areas where contamination
would likely be present.
* No samples were taken in the known pesticide storage areas, and it does not
appear samples were taken in the known hazardous substances/chemical storageareas.
* No soil samples were taken in the driplines of the pre-1978 buildings andstructures (existing or formerly demolished), where one would expect to find
elevated lead levels from lead-based paint.
* Soil samples were not analyzed for paraquat, a highly toxic weed killer
(herbicide). Given the historical information provided, soil samples should havebeen analyzed for a broader number of constituents, including paraquat.
Attached is Jennifer's letter to the dEIR sent during the public comment period.
2. My own public comment letter in the EIR also addressed some of these issues.
(It also discussed other issues as well). I will send that in a separate email sinceit is so large, but here are a few exerpts.
"Soil testing would be one of the most important issues to affect a proper
assessment of the property. Since the proposed project involves excessivegrading, (far below the 3ft) soil analysis should include both near-surface testing
and testing at various depths during the grading process. A detailed report forexact areas tested according to the California Hazardous Waste and Hazardous
Substances Act (DTSC 2014), County of San Diego Dept. of EnvironmentalHealth, and the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. To underline what is
NOT done is a single soil testing at a remote area, far from the area wherefarming occurred.
In addition, I am very concerned that the DTSC (California Dept. of Toxic
Substances Control) and the Dept of Pesticide Regulation did NOT receive a copyof the draft EIR. These important institutions must not only be notified but given
enough time to read and respond to the draft EIR for Marja Acres. Therefore I amrequesting an extension of the deadline for the Public comment period (ending
May 29 2019) to allow these two regulatory institutions to have time to read thedraft and comment since TOXIC SUBSTANCES are always found on farmland
properties. They need to be assured that proper testing was performed."
3. My neighbor, Jennifer Rich wrote to Teri DelCamp as was discussed in ourconference call. At that time, she had not heard back. Since our call, we heard
back from staff in response to her letter(s) questioning why the sampling was notdone according to DTSC standards. I will attempt to respond to their comments.
Keep in mind that the developer PAID Stantec to do the soil sampling as stated inAppendix F Soil Sampling. The report was prepared for New Urban West on
October 13, 2015. My response to that letter in red.
Good afternoon Jennifer and Greg –
Please see the city’s responses to your comments in the email below organizedaround the main summary comments in your bullet points, as well as a last
response to the more recent email which is attached:
1. Comment: Only 20 soil borings were taken over the 20+ acre project site,
even though the DTSC Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties(Third Revision) dated August 7, 2008 recommends 30 borings. Please note that
the Response to Comments on the Final EIR cite the 2008 DTSC InterimGuidance in regards to the soil sampling methodology utilized at the project site.
Response: Based on the DTSC Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural
Fields, Table 1: for 20 acres, 30 soil borings and only 8 composite samples are therecommended sampling frequency. However, composite samples are a mixture of
multiple areas and are less representative than discrete samples. The DTSCguidance states that if samples are not composited, then all discrete samples shall
be analyzed. Instead of the 8 composite samples recommended, a total of 20shallow discrete samples were collected on 1-acre centers at the site and analyzed.
Therefore, 2.5 times more samples were collected and analyzed thanrecommended by DTSC guidelines. Also note that 30 soils borings/samples were
taken at the site. 20 were shallow and the other 10 were deep. All 30 sampleswere sent to the lab. The 20 shallow samples were tested and because the result
indicated levels were below thresholds, there was no need to test the 10 deepersamples.
Composite sampling can dilute out one particularly contaminated location. The
shallow discrete samples were, according to the report by Stantec, soil sampleswere taken at twenty locations from 0.5-1ft in depth, indicated as "shallow
discrete samples." Locations of those borings are attached here. Note there wasno sampling at the known pesticide storage holding tank. Not rmentioned in the
report is the fact that there were buried storage tanks within the boundaries of thatproperty. NONE of those storage sites were tested.
Of the 30 borings, the "deep borings" as indicated above were never tested and
the location of those 3ft deep borings are unknown. As stated, those were neveranalyzed despite the findings that I uncovered in the report. In the EIR P. 1.2.
Summary the following measurements were detected in some of the surfaceborings. https://www.carlsbadca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?
BlobID=456801. 4,4 DDE (a breakdown product of DDT) was detected in 4 out of the 20 soil
samples ranging from 0.0065-0.027 mg/kg (or 6.5-27.0 parts per billion). Theseare "above laboratory reporting limits." Those locations were not mentioned in
the Stantec report or the EIR.2. DDT was detected in 2 out of the 20 samples ranging from 0.0057-0.037 mg/kg
(or 5.7-37 parts per billion). Those locations were HA 3-1 and HA5-1 located atthe lower part of the property. It is possible that those two samplings were the
result of erosion from the upper portion of the property.3. "Organochlorine" toxins were discovered from the property as a "cumulative
concentration" which as stated above, dilutes out the actual point ofcontamination. Toxaphene is an organochlorine which was found on nearby
Robertson Ranch above Cal-EPA recommended levels and it is safe to state thatall farms in this area (especially within 600 ft) and farmed during the same era,
would have that same use. Toxaphene irreversibly binds to the soil and cansediment to lower depths. Despite this, the sample tested indicated a 0.146 mg/kg
(or 146 parts per billion) measurement. It is unknown where the the "cumulative"samples originated.
4. Chlordane, a man made pesticide https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=353&tid=62 was also found in one soil sample at a level of 0.082mg/kg or 82
parts per billion. The safe limit for Chlordane according to Cal EPA is 0.1 partsper billion. This one soil sample was 820 x the allowed measurement.
Further information will be gathered to provide the correct safe exposure levels as
per Cal EPA for 4,4 DDE, DDT, organochlorine. These levels are different andshould be reported correctly. The report indicated that safe levels of ALL
chemicals is 1mg/kg which is proven in my statement above for Chlordane. Further research is needed for the other chemicals and their individual exposure
limits.
1. No biased, discrete sampling was conducted in areas where contaminationwould likely be present.
Response: No signs of stained soil or mixing of pesticides were reported outside
the metal storage containers. Interviews with the palm farm operator reported thatonly fertilizers and no pesticides were used and stored in the eastern storage area.
Therefore, no biased sampling was recommended. A discrete sample wasperformed in the area graded for construction for the parking lot.
The farmer, Jay Hoffman died in ~2011 so there is no one person to ask
concerning the location of mixing the pesticides. He owned the property from theearly 1960's until his death. The underground metal storage tanks are located in
the upper part of the property so a consult with the "plan farm operator" who isusing the property on the lower western most part of the property-has no
knowledge as to what or where chemicals were mixed in the agricultural areaabove their location. This Palm farm operator is relatively new to that location,
certainly located there well after Mr. Hoffman, the owner and farmer had passedaway. Therefore the Palm farm operator is in no position to make any comments
concerning the upper agricultural parcel.
It becomes critical to state here that indeed it would be to the safety of theresidents to the west along Kelly AND the residents to the south (where Jennifer
Rich and I live) TO REPEAT THE TESTING and to have a biased sampling nearthe known pesticide and gasoline storage sites both above and below ground.
1. No samples were taken in the known pesticide storage areas, and it does notappear samples were taken in the known hazardous substances/chemical storage
areas.
Response: The pesticide storage areas presented in photographs in the Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment report show that the pesticides are stored over
properly sized secondary containment and inside metal storage containers. Nosign of stained soil or mixing of pesticides were reported outside the metal storage
containers. Interviews with the palm farm operator reported that only fertilizersand no pesticides were used and stored in the eastern storage area. No known
areas of outside pesticide storage were reported. Therefore, additional samplingwas not recommended based on field observations.
Not all chemical/toxic waste has color. Some do but that determination is a very
coarse and unreliable method to determine if contamination is present. Againsince the original farmer had died, there is no way to know where all mixing
occurred. Since the property, according to Stantec, indicated that the parcel wasused for farming since the early 1950's there were no regulations at that time to
provide secondary containment for storage. And, underground chemical storagetanks were undoubtedly metal-withOUT secondary containment, and over the past
70 years, the metal storage tanks will have degraded and any stored chemicalsallowed to leach out. Field observations are not enough especially when the
proposed development will be digging down well past the 3 ft borings that werenever analyzed.
Simply put, the individuals who would be able to discuss storage are no longer
living. A through biased (to include storage areas) and analysis of all 3ftsampling areas NEEDS to be sampled and ALL samples analyzed to protect
nearby residents.
1. No soil samples were taken in the driplines of the pre-1978 buildings andstructures (existing or formerly demolished), where one would expect to find
elevated lead levels from lead-based paint.
Response: Final EIR Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 requires a lead-based paint(LBP) survey to be conducted prior to demolition. If LBP is determined to be
present on-site, it would be on the buildings themselves where paint was applied(i.e., the walls, woodwork, etc.) as lead does not leach from the paint. Paint chips
on the soil would be reported during the survey. Demolition and removal mustcomply with applicable regulations for demolition methods and dust suppression.
As long as the LBP is analyzed prior to demolition, I am satisfied.
1. Soil samples were not analyzed for paraquat, a highly toxic weed killer(herbicide). Given the historical information provided, soil samples should have
been analyzed for a broader number of constituents, including paraquat.
Response: According to DTSC’s Interim Guidance for Sampling AgriculturalProperties (2008), Section 3.0 Sampling Strategies, the only pesticides that
require analysis are OCPs, including DDT, toxaphene, and dieldrin, etc. Thesection on pesticides goes on to state that “while paraquat does have a longer half-
life [than most other classes of pesticides], it has either not been detected ordetected rarely at trace levels at sites which DTSC has had oversight, therefore
routine analyses for paraquat is not required for field areas.”
Paraquat is harmful to humans and needs to be included in the analysis. PERIOD. Knowing that paraquat testing is done will provide a level of safety for the
residents living nearby.
1. (Per the recent attached email) There is no Section 1.2 in the Phase I Report.
It should have referenced Section 2.3. Also, the reference to ASTM E-1527-05 isoutdated. It should have referenced ASTM E 1527-13.
The wrong section was referenced and should have been Section 2.3 where the
exceptions and limiting conditions were noted. Additionally, the report wascompleted per ASTM E 1527-13. The ASTM Standard was referenced correctly
through the majority of the report but was missed in one paragraph (Conclusions). These typographical errors do not impact the findings of the report and do not
mean the Phase I ESA was conducted incorrectly.
City staff’s position is that the site was adequately characterized in the Phase IESA, the Phase I ESA was supervised and conducted in accordance with all
applicable guidelines and standards by personnel qualified to do so, and the PhaseI ESA was peer-reviewed by the city’s EIR consultant firm prior to its inclusion in
the EIR. Therefore, no revisions to the CEQA analysis or EIR are required."
As a resident of Loma Laguna and researcher at UCSD for over 25 years as abiochemist and Lab Manager, observing EPA and OSHA guidelines for all
laboratory personnel in our lab, I feel qualified to discuss the limits of exposure tohumans as per chemical toxicity. Along with my neighbor, Jennifer Rich, an
expert in the California Dept. of Toxic Substance Control, we both insist that thesoil at Marja Acres be recharacterized using the correct exposure limits of CAL-
EPA and OSHA. Ms. Rich has indicated with her 27 years of expertise IN THATFIELD that the soil at Marja Acres needs proper characterization. It is a travesty
that with the plans proposed by New Urban West, the developer, to dig far belowthe 3ft levels-that the soil samples that WERE collected were never analyzed.
Who knows which chemicals leached into the ground over the 70 years offarming? The grading, no matter how much the area is hosed down, will certainly
expose areas below "the shallow discreet samples."
It is our request to have our City Council mandate that the area be retested withbiased sampling not only at the surface but at the 3ft level (or greater) at the full
30 sampling as recommended by DTSC and that no combined (or cumulativesampling) be done so as to dilute out certain potentially contaminated sampling
areas. What was done in 2015 is outrageous, and needs to be brought to theattention of the City Council. Just think, 20 samples in 20 acres. What are the
chances of missing a potential hazardous site, especially when the storage tankswere avoided?
Consider the State HAA, when the safety of the residents are concerned, the
developer is assuming what is not known won't hurt you.
Thank you,Kris Wright
--Kris Wright
kriswrt222@gmail.com<mailto:kriswrt222@gmail.com>
--Priya Bhat-Patel
Carlsbad Council Member, District 3Community | Health | Transparency
priya@priyabhatpatel.com<mailto:priya@priyabhatpatel.com>www.PriyaForCarlsbad.com<http://www.priyaforcarlsbad.com/>
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/priyabhatpatelforcarlsbad/> |Twitter<https://www.twitter.com/priyabhatpatel> |
Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/priyabhatpatel>
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
[I]
September 15, 2020
Members of the Carlsbad Planning Commission:
We have reviewed the Response to Comments (RTCs) in the Final Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) for the Marja Acres Project. Most of the responses simply reiterate
what we had already reviewed in the Draft EIR. It is disappointing that despite our
comments, which clearly show a lack of characterization at the project site, no additional
characterization is planned. All of our comments still stand, and we continue to believe
the characterization of the project site is woefully inadequate.
One of our major concerns, as outlined in more detail in our May 29, 2019 comment
letter addressed to City Planning staff, was that only 20 soil borings were taken over the
20+ acre project site. Additionally, based on the Property Plan, Figure No. 2 (Final EIR,
Appendix F [see attached]) showing the shallow soil sample locations, and based on
our review of the RTCs, no focused, authoritative samples were taken at the project
site. No soil samples were taken in the known pesticide storage areas or along the drip
lines of pre-1978 buildings and structures, including the family home. It also does not
appear as though soil samples were taken in the known hazardous
substances/chemical storage areas. Without proper characterization, it is impossible to
determine the extent of contamination, and whether or not appropriate mitigation
measures have been identified that would ensure the protection of human health
(construction workers, people living near the project site, and future residents) and the
environment.
Many of the RTCs cite the August 7, 2008 Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision),
hereafter referred to as the DTSC Guidance, regarding the soil sampling methodology
utilized at the project site. The following notes are of particular interest:
• For a 20 acre site, the DTSC Guidance (Table 1: Recommended Number of
Sampling Locations) recommends 30 borings. Again, only 20 soil borings were
taken at the project site.
• On the first page of the DTSC Guidance it states in bold-face type "This guidance
is not intended to diminish the need to take focused, authoritative samples at site
locations commonly associated with hazardous substances releases nor replace
guidance provided by the PEA Guidance Manual. This guidance is not
applicable to areas where pesticides were mixed, stored, disposed, or areas
where pesticides may have accumulated, such as ponds and drainage ditches."
Yet, the Final EIR states that there were " ... multiple out-buildings used for
storage of pesticides and hazardous materials, and a single-family home." There
Page 1 of 6
are also photographs (10 and 11) that show views of the eastern and western
pesticide storage areas. Based on those two photographs, it is highly likely that
pesticide mixing occurred on the project site. Photograph 12 is a view of the
chemical storage at the palm farm and photograph 13 is a view of the hazardous
material storage area for the guitar repair center. (Final EIR, Appendix F, Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment)
• Section 2.2 of the DTSC Guidance also states that it " ... does not apply to former
agricultural property that has been graded for construction or other purposes,
that has received fill, or has had parking lots or structures placed on it following
active use as an agricultural field ... These areas may require biased, discrete
sampling as opposed to the sampling for agricultural properties discussed in this
document."
However, response IND-22.3 states, "It is recognized that portions of the project
site have been farmed. Additionally, the site has been disturbed, and at times
graded or otherwise tilled associated with site improvements, on-going nursery
operations and limited agriculture that has occurred in the southern portion of the
site."
The response is supported, in part, by Figure 5.5-1 of the Final EIR which shows
Building #1 (The Hoffman Residence) having been built in 1951, with additions in
1961, 1964 and 1977-80. Also, aerial photographs from 1953, 1964, and 1970
showing greenhouses on the project site and by 1979 they appear to be gone
(Final EIR, Appendix F).
Clearly, there are areas on the project site that warrant biased, discrete
sampling, as well as analyses for a broader number of constituents.
Unfortunately, neither occurred at the project site.
• Section 2.6 of the DTSC Guidance states, "In many cases, agricultural properties
may include other areas of concern such as operations yards, storage areas, fuel
tanks, residences, irrigation systems, and animal facilities." It goes on to provide
a list of examples of areas of concern and then states, "Although agricultural-
related, these targeted areas should be considered during the PEA scoping
meeting and investigated using standard PEA protocols."
Section 3.1 .3.1 of the DTSC Guidance states, "Focused sampling in
mixing/loading/storage areas, drainage ditches, farm houses, or outbuilding
areas may require analyses for a number of other constituents besides OCPs
and arsenic, including other classes of pesticides/herbicides, paraquat, metals,
and petroleum related compounds ... "
Section 3.2 of the DTSC Guidance states, " ... When the site has been used for
agricultural crop, the presumption is that agricultural chemicals were applied
uniformly across the site in any given year and that the variation across the site
Page 2 of6
will be relatively small ... The uniform application assumption does not apply for
non-cultivated areas (e.g. drainage ditches, farm houses and other structures,
mixing/loading areas, storage sheds, etc.)"
The point is, there are known pesticide and hazardous materials/chemical
storage areas, pre-1978 residential buildings, former greenhouses, and quite
possibly other areas that should have been more thoroughly investigated (i.e.,
biased, discrete sampling conducted in those areas), rather than making an
assumption that agricultural chemicals were applied uniformly across the entire
project site in any given year. There should have also been more than 20
sampling locations across the 20+ acre project site, and samples should have
been analyzed for a broader number of constituents.
In our May 29, 2019 comment letter, we requested a table listing all of the
buildings/structures located on the project site, including the dates of construction, the
type (e.g., residential home, pesticide storage, mixing, etc.), and the size. Instead of
providing a table, the response (IND-62.3) we received was "EIR Appendix F provides
the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Shallow Soil Sampling report. This
report provides detailed information regarding the historic uses of the property, and
includes historic aerial photographs, historic topographic maps, and city directories.
These records indicate approximate dates of construction and the uses of various
buildings/occupants of the site." We read the report and that is why we made the
request. All of this information should be provided in one comprehensive table.
Figure 2, Property Plan (Final EIR, Appendix F [see attached]) shows the locations of
the 20 soil borings. It also shows various buildings/structures on the project site (figure
is dated 15/10/09). It is impossible to make out each individual building/structure, and
most are not labeled. In our May 29, 2019 comment letter, we requested a figure(s) that
clearly identifies all buildings/structures, including those that were previously
removed/demolished. We also asked that all of the areas/buildings/structures,
especially storage, mixing/loading, and wash-down areas be properly labeled. A
comprehensive figure showing the soil borings overlaid on the buildings/structures, both
past and present is a must. That, in conjunction with the table mentioned above, would
clearly show areas with possible contamination and whether or not soil borings were
taken in those areas. It would most certainly identify data gaps. Unfortunately,
response IND-62.6 did not even acknowledge our request for this type of figure(s).
Response IND-62.6 states, "The soil sampling methodology generally follows the
Department of Toxic Substances Control-Interim Guidance for Sampling Agricultural
Fields [sic] to determine the sampling number and depths. Based on the Department of
Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) guidance listed in Section 3.1 where sites are 20+
acres discrete samples should be collected "on 1-acre centers" and Section 3.2 "Each
located [sic] should be sampled to include one surface sample (0-6 inches) and one
subsurface sample (2 to 3 foot range). (Note: 0 inches means first encountered soil.
Thick mats of vegetable material, roots, and other extraneous material should not be
sampled.]"" Response IND-22.6 specifically refers to DTSC's -Interim Guidance for
Page 3 of6
Sampling Agricultural Properties (Third Revision) dated August 7, 2008. The Third
Revision is the latest guidance on DTSC's website for agricultural properties. We
reviewed Sections 3.1 and 3.2 and those sections do not contain the information as
provided in response IND-62.6. Please explain the discrepancy.
Response IND-22.8 states the following: "According to DTSC's Interim Guidance for
Sampling Agricultural Properties (2008), Section 3.0 Sampling Strategies 'While
paraquat does have a longer half-life [sic], it has either not been detected or detected
rarely at trace levels at sites which DTSC has had oversight, therefore routine analyses
for paraquat is not required for field areas." Interestingly, the response does not include
the last sentence in that paragraph (Section 3.0 Sampling Strategies) which says
"Analyses for paraquat may be required in storage and mixing/loading areas." There
are known storage areas on the project site, and more than likely mixing/loading areas
as well. Why wasn't the highly toxic weed killer (herbicide), paraquat, included in the
analyses? Why weren't soil samples taken in the pesticide storage areas? Again, if
sampling is not conducted in the correct locations, and samples are not analyzed for the
correct constituents, then it is impossible to have an accurate understanding of the
extent of contamination.
Responses IND-62.1 and IND-62.2: The responses do not address our concern
regarding potential lead in soil around the pre-1978 buildings/structures currently or
previously located on the project site. In fact, response IND-62.2 states, "The shallow
soil samples were collected only to assess historical agricultural use throughout the
Property. There was no lead-based paint hazard assessment performed on the
structure [sic] and none of the soil sampling was conducted with any intention of
evaluating the potential lead-based paint hazards associated with the structures. A pre
demolition survey is required prior to removal of any pre-1978 building [sic] or structures
as addressed in Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 ." Please note that the pre-demolition survey
required prior to removal of any pre-1978 buildings, per Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 , only
addresses lead from lead-based paint (LBP) and asbestos in buildings. It does not
address the potential for lead in soil. Per our original comment, we know that LBP may
be present on buildings and structures that were constructed prior to 1978. This in turn
creates the possibility that, through the action of normal weathering and maintenance,
there may be lead from LBP in the soil surrounding these buildings and structures. The
soil in the driplines of pre-1978 buildings and structures, both existing and previously
demolished, should be sampled and analyzed for lead. Again, if samples are not taken
in locations where contamination is likely present, obtaining an accurate picture of the
extent of contamination is unachievable.
The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Final EIR, Appendix F) concluded there
was "no evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the
Property" and that "no further investigation appears to be warranted at this time." This
conclusion is not surprising given the following:
Page 4 of6
• Only 20 soil borings were taken over the 20+ acre project site, even though the
DTSC Guidance recommends 30 borings. Please note that the RTCs on the
Final EIR cite the DTSC Guidance in regards to the soil sampling methodology
utilized at the project site.
• No biased, discrete sampling was conducted in areas where contamination
would likely be present.
• No samples were taken in the known pesticide storage areas, and it does not
appear samples were taken in the known hazardous substances/chemical
storage areas.
• No soil samples were taken in the driplines of the pre-1978 buildings and
structures (existing or formerly demolished), where one would expect to find
elevated lead levels from LBP.
• Soil samples were not analyzed for paraquat, a highly toxic weed killer
(herbicide). Given the historical information provided, soil samples should have
been analyzed for a broader number of constituents, including paraquat.
There is a lot of good, historical information in the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment (Final EIR, Appendix F) that points to where possible contamination may
be present on the project site, unfortunately, the sampling methodology utilized, largely
did not take that information into account. We strongly believe further investigation is
warranted.
Response IND-22.3 states, ''The result of this soils testing indicates that the agricultural
use of the project site does not represent a REC or a human health risk in light of the
contemplated residential use of the project site. Therefore, implementation of the
proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment." Since the project site was not adequately
characterized, we do not believe there is sufficient information to make the
determination that the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials/substances into the
environment. Again, without proper characterization, it is impossible to determine the
extent of contamination, and whether or not appropriate mitigation measures have been
identified that would ensure the protection of human health and the environment.
We appreciate the RTCs on the Draft EIR, and we hope you will consider these
additional comments prior to certifying the EIR or making any final decisions on the
Page 5 of 6
Marja Acres Project. If you have any questions, please fe~I free to contact Jennifer
Rich at )r email jmrfunder@gmail.com .
Sincerely,
Jennifer Rich and Greg Funderburk
Park Drive Homeowners
jmrfunder@gmail.com and smoqetr@gmail.com
Attachment
Page 6 of 6
~ i 0
~ ,, .,
C i:£ :I Ul
~
C,
~
'"
GRADED LAND UNDER
DEVELOPMENT
NOTE: THIS DRAWING ILLUSTRATES SUPPORTING INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO A STANTEC CONSULTING LTD. REPORT ANO MUST NOT BE USED FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
~
0
PROPERTY PLAN Project No.: 185803532
Scale: AS SHOWN
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Date: 15/10/09
4901 EL CAMINO REAL, CARLSBAD, CA Own. By: CDot.1 015 90004
Client: NEW URBAN WEST, INC. App'd By: KE
LEGEND
• SHALLOW SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
250 ___.___
SCALE : AS SHOWN
1Fl9.No.:
500FT
2 (» Stantec
May 29, 2019
Teri Delcamp, Principal Planner
Carlsbad Planning Division
1635 Faraday Avenue
Carlsbad, California 92008
Ms. Delcamp:
Below, are our official comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the
proposed Marja Acres project:
In April 2018, the City of Carlsbad requested public comment on the proposed Marja
Acres project, and the scope and content of environmental issues to be examined in the
EIR. We and many others submitted comments. Many of those comments addressed
concerns regarding the potential for hazardous substances to be present on the project
site due to the historic agricultural use of the property (circa 1953). Additionally, old
buildings and structures are located on the project site so there is a potential for
asbestos containing materials (ACMs) and lead based paint (LBP) to be present.
The Draft EIR acknowledges that due to the age of the existing structures on the project
site (constructed circa 1950), ACMs and LBP are likely to be present. It goes on to say
that "the potential presence of ACMs and LBP on the project site is a significant impact
to the public and environment, specifically when existing structures are demolished as
part of the proposed project." Because "the proposed project has the potential to create
a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the release of ACMs and LBP into the
environment", the Draft EIR proposes "implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 ",
which "would reduce this potentially significant impact to a level less than significant."
Unfortunately, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 does not address the potential for lead from
LBP to be in the soil surrounding the structures.
We know that LBP may be present on buildings and structures that were constructed
prior to 1978. This in turn creates the possibility that, through the action of normal
weathering and maintenance, there may be lead from LBP in the soil surrounding these
buildings and structures. The soil around pre-1978 buildings and structures should be
tested for lead. Appendix F of the Draft EIR shows that 20 soil borings were taken
around the 20+ acre property and analyzed for lead, however, none of those samples
appear to be located in the driplines of those structures (see Figure No. 2, Property
Plan), which is where you would expect to find elevated lead levels. Why weren't an
adequate number of samples taken in the driplines of all pre-1978 buildings and
structures and analyzed for lead? Results should be compared to the California
residential screening level for lead, which is 80 mg/kg. Table 1 in Appendix F shows
Page 1 of 6
that the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) residential regional
screening levels (RSLs) were used for lead at 400 mg/kg. The lower California
screening level should be used. It is not surprising that the highest hit of lead was 34
mg/kg given that none of the 20 soil samples analyzed were taken from the drip lines of
the pre-1978 buildings and structures. Additional sampling and analyses should be
performed.
Appendix F of the Draft EIR says there are "multiple out-buildings used for storage of
pesticides and hazardous materials." Please provide a table that lists all of the
buildings and structures located on the project site and include the dates of
construction, the type of buildings/structures (e.g., residential home, pesticide storage,
mixing, etc.), and the size.
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was conducted and, as noted above, limited
soil testing was performed (Phase II). The report, prepared for New Urban West, Inc.
by Stantec Consulting Services Inc. is located in Appendix F of the Draft EIR. It's titled
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Shallow Soil Sampling, dated October 13,
2015. In addition to addressing ACMs and LBP, the Phase 1 and Phase II
Environmental Site Assessments address pesticides. The Draft EIR Impact Analysis,
Impact 5.8-2 Release of Hazardous Materials into the Environment asks the question
"Would the proposed project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?" With regard to pesticides, the Draft EIR
(page 5.8-9) states that "Based upon the soil analytical results, the agricultural use of
the project site does not represent a REC or a human health risk in light of the
contemplated residential use of the project site. Therefore, implementation of the
proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment. This is considered a less than significant
impact."
The Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (Appendix F of the Draft
EIR) are not adequate for characterizing the contamination at the project site. If
contamination is present at levels that are unsuitable for a mixed-use scenario,
including residential use, then people will be at risk. Additionally, when the project site
is graded and dirt is being moved around, there is potential for construction workers and
those living near the project site to become exposed to contaminants through various
exposure routes. It is imperative the project site be adequately characterized so that
appropriate mitigation measures can be taken to ensure the protection of human health
(construction workers, people living near the project site, and future residents) and the
environment.
In reviewing the Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments in Appendix F of
the Draft EIR, it was noted that only 20 soil borings were taken over the 20+ acre project
site. The number of soil borings is inadequate for proper characterization. Focused or
Page 2 of 6
biased samples should have been taken in mixing/loading/storage/wash-down areas,
drainage ditches, farm houses, and outbuildings, and as noted above, along the drip
lines of pre-1978 buildings and structures. Figure No. 2, Property Plan (Appendix F of
the Draft EIR) shows the locations of the 20 borings. In looking at the figure, it's
impossible to see all of the individual buildings/structures and almost none of them are
labeled. What is very noticeable is that samples don't appear to have been taken in
areas where one might expect a spill or release to have occurred. Also, there were no
soil borings along the fence lines of the residential homes on Park Drive that are
adjacent to the project site. Please explain the sampling methodology used in the
Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, and specifically explain why focused or
biased sampling doesn't appear to have been conducted. Please provide figures that
clearly identify all buildings/structures, including those that have been removed or
demolished, and properly label all of the various areas, especially noting storage,
mixing/loading, and wash-down areas. One figure is not sufficient.
Twenty samples were analyzed for organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), arsenic and lead.
Please explain why only twenty soil samples were analyzed. Also, please explain why
other classes of pesticides/herbicides, paraquat, metals, and petroleum related
compounds were not analyzed. A routine analysis for paraquat is not usually performed
for field areas, but storage and mixing/loading areas are good places to sample for the
herbicide.
Were soil samples analyzed for chlorpyrifos? If not, why weren't they analyzed for
chlorpyrifos?
Were fumigants used on the project site? If so, there is a possibility that groundwater
could be contaminated with 1,2,3-trichloropropane (TCP), a contaminant that occurred
in the manufacture of two commonly used soil fumigants used in California to manage
nematodes. TCP is a persistent pollutant in groundwater and has been classified as
"likely to be carcinogenic to humans" by the USEPA.
It doesn't appear as though any groundwater samples were taken at the project site to
rule out groundwater contamination. Please explain why no groundwater samples were
taken.
Page 8.1 of Appendix F says that "Based on the site inspection, review of adjacent
properties, and available environmental records, the likelihood for vapor intrusion at the
Site is considered low ... " It doesn't appear as though soil gas testing was performed as
part of the Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments. Please explain why
soil gas samples were not taken to rule out the vapor intrusion to indoor air pathway.
The Draft EIR says that there was no visible evidence of any underground storage
tanks/structures. Other than a visual inspection and searching databases for evidence
of underground storage tanks/structures, was any other mechanism utilized (e.g.,
Page 3 of 6
ground penetrating radar)? If not, why not? Will there be a contingency plan in place if
underground storage tanks/structures or other previously unidentified contamination is
discovered during the planned excavation and grading activities?
According to the Draft EIR there is a septic tank located on the project site. Please
explain what will be done with the septic tank.
Did the owners ever burn on site? If so, those areas should be tested for dioxin.
Page 1 of the 2015 Stantec Report (Appendix F ofth~ Draft EIR) is signed by Mr. Kyle
Emerson, Managing Principal Geologist, PG. Why isn't it stamped?
The Draft EIR (pages 5.8-1 and 8-2) references the Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment and Shallow Soil Sampling (Stantec Consulting Services Inc. [Stantec]
2018). Why is this a 2018 reference when the document is dated October 13, 2015?
The Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments are over 3 ½ years old.
Why isn't there a more recent environmental site assessment? When did agricultural
operations cease at the project site? What has the property been used for since
agricultural operations ceased?
Was the County Agricultural Commissioner consulted regarding this project site? They
may or may not have specific information on file, but they will often have extensive
knowledge of the farming practices over many years.
Draft EIR, Appendix F, Section 6.0, Interviews: This only shows that the owner was
interviewed. Was anyone else interviewed, for instance, people that used to work in the
fields?
In the Draft EIR, Appendix F Part 2 contains Appendix E, Laboratory Analytical Report.
On page 4 of 39 it says the following:
GC Semi VOA
Method(s) 8081A: The closing continuing calibration verification (CCV) standard
associated with batch 440-283538 failed to meet acceptance limits. The associated
samples were re-analyzed following a successful CCV and produced similar results,
indicating that the sample matrix is adversely affecting the instrument and causing the
failures.HA-1-1 (440-122379-1), HA-2-1 (440-122379-3), HA-3-1(440-122379-5), HA-4-1
(440-122379-7), HA-5-1 (440-122379-9), HA-6-1 (440-122379-11), HA-9-1 (440-122379-
17), HA-16-1(440-122379-31), HA-19-1 (440-122379-37), (CCV 440-283538/36) and (CCV
440-283538/37)
Page4 of 6
No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in
the Definitions/Glossary page.
Please explain what occurred above regarding the "failures". How would this bias the
results (i.e., high or low)?
Why do the reporting limits (RLs) for Chlordane (technical) vary from 49 ug/Kg to 100
ug/Kg, and for Toxaphene 190 ug/Kg to 420 ug/Kg? Also, why do the Rls for
Toxaphene seem so high? How does this affect the results?
There is a column for MDL (method detection limit), but there are no results listed.
Why?
Why does there appear to be only one QC sample result that includes Toxaphene?
In Table 1, Summary of Soil Analytical Results -Arsenic, Lead, and Pesticides
(Appendix F of the Draft EIR): The results for Toxaphene for samples HA-8-1 through
HA-20-1 do not match the lab results as shown in Appendix E, Laboratory Analytical
Report (Appendix F of the Draft EIR). Please reconcile the discrepancies and review
the table to ensure its accuracy.
Who is the regulatory authority that approved the adequacy of the Phase I and Phase 11
Environmental Site Assessments? Given that the property has been a former
agricultural site since the early 1950s, who is the regulatory authority that has
determined this property, a potentially contaminated site, is now suitable for mixed-use,
including residential reuse? Are there any approval letters? If so, please provide
copies.
Significant grading is planned along the backyard fence lines of many of the homes on
Park Drive that are adjacent to the project site. We know that pesticides and herbicides
were used on the project site, and that grading will disturb the native soil. During all
phases of grading and excavation at the project site, will there be dust suppression
measures in place? If yes, please describe. If no, please explain. Will there be
continuous air monitoring for particulate and other airborne contaminants with publicly
available results? If yes, please describe. If no, please explain.
Based on all of the information provided in the Draft EIR, including its appendices, we
do not believe the proposed Marja Acres project site has been adequately
characterized. Therefore, we do not know if the project site is suitable for its proposed
mixed use, including residential reuse. If contamination exists on the project site at
levels that are not protective of human health and the environment, then people and the
environment will be at risk. Also, this proposed project, which calls for extensive
excavation and grading, could create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving
the release of hazardous substances into the environment. Until the project site is
properly characterized, additional mitigation measures cannot be taken to ensure the
Page 5 of6
protection of public health and the environment. The City of Carlsbad should not
approve the proposed Marja Acres development until the project site has been
adequately characterized. If there is contamination present on the project site, whether
it be in groundwater, soil or soil gas, at levels that are not protective of human health
and the environment then it needs to be properly mitigated.
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Draft EIR and for your consideration of our
comments. We look forward to receiving your written responses. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call Jennifer Rich at
Sincerely,
Jennifer Rich and Greg Funderburk
Park Drive Homeowners
jmriunder@gmail.com and smoqetr@gmail.com
Page 6 of 6
From:Council Internet Email
Cc:Teri Delcamp; Melissa Flores; Don Neu; Faviola Medina; Tammy Cloud-McMinn
Subject:FW: Marja Acres Development
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 3:13:53 PM
From: Sandi Meyer <mtnest2009@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 2:13 PM
To: Barbara Wood <bwood@roadrunner.com>
Cc: City Clerk <Clerk@carlsbadca.gov>; Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: Re: Marja Acres Development
Well said!
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020, 1:35 PM Barbara Wood <bwood@roadrunner.com> wrote:
As a 37 years’ resident of the NW quadrant of Carlsbad, I am deeply concerned about the
proposed development of Marja Acres. I am not specifically opposed to the development if it
follows the Carlsbad General Plan, but it appears that a developer is proposing to bypass the
General Plan that allows a maximum of 195 dwelling units on the 13 acres, and will instead
squeeze in 296 units. My information is that the developer will attempt to utilize California State
Mandates to circumvent the Carlsbad General Plan. My opposition is obvious: more traffic
congestion on a major highway (El Camino Real), and a strain on local schools and city services.
But, more importantly, if this development is approved and the Carlsbad General Plan is ignored,
it sets a precedent that will be to the detriment of Carlsbad residents. When the General Plan
(Growth Management Plan?) was adopted and approved by our city leaders and citizens, it was
with the intention and purpose to not exclude people from purchasing homes in Carlsbad, but to
limit population growth so that our city could be properly managed to provide a safe environment
and to avoid overcrowding which would impact the safety, peace and enjoyment of property
owners and merchants. It is a good plan and has kept Carlsbad a very unique and desirable city
for those fortunate to be able to purchase property or engage in a business. Not to say that we
are shutting out future potential buyers as with most of the country, we are becoming an aging
population and properties will pass or become available as time moves on.
I implore each of you to consider the long term impact of this “alternative development” and
reject the proposal as submitted that will be presented to City Council on November 3. As I recall
the objective of the General Plan is to provide a well governed and planned community that
serves all of its present and future citizens.
Respectfully submitted,
Barbara Wood
Carlsbad, CA 92010
bwood@roadrunner.com
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
From:Penny Johnson
To:City Clerk
Subject:Marja Acres
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 4:50:45 PM
Sent from my iPad
How does the general plan get shoved aside unless some” back room “ deals have been made but not explained forsome kind of credibility?It is Carlsbad politics at work......AGAIN!!Vote NO on Marja Acres !!!!!!
Penny Johnson43 year Carlsbad resident
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
From:Linda Sharp
To:City Clerk; Teri Delcamp
Subject:Marja Acres
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 4:45:02 PM
I am writing to strongly oppose the Marja Acres development. The proposed project is flawed in so
many ways yet I have not seen any compelling response to citizen concerns about traffic, density of
units, decrease in proposed affordable units, etc. As with so many other projects in Carlsbad the lastfew years, it has been undertaken with questionable procedures and motives. Who really is benefittingfrom the building and developing of Carlsbad?
I am tired of fighting battles about the unbridled building here. I wish our city leadership (with theexception of a few) would provide more guidance on our pandemic response at this time and not worryso much about developers and needless developments. And for those chasing after the dollars, our
tepid Covid response is costing plenty now and in the future.
Linda SharpCarlsbad resident
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
From:Kris Wright
To:City Clerk
Subject:Traffic and Marja Acres
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 4:32:54 PM
Attachments:2019 Roadway LOS Analysis (2020-02).pdf
Screen Shot 2020-10-28 at 3.53.35 PM.png
To Mr. Mayor and City Council members:
Attached is the City's Vehicle Level of Service, analyzed independently by Kimley
Horn. On pg 76 shows the faulty analysis by the Traffic Dept. since ~1989 which
falsly assigns high grades to our city street segments. This City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis, Feb. 2020, starting at approximately pg 74
shows the segment on El Camino Real between Tamarack and Cannon having an F
grade. According to the Growth Management Plan passed by voters in 1986, any
segment with a failing grade should not allow development.
With the update to the General Plan in 2015, the City allowed street segments to be
"exempted" from the Growth Management Plan thus allowing development. Indeed
with Marja Acres, which the application was completed in December 2018, SHOULD
have used the LOS analysis. Instead, the new VMT analysis was used to bypass a
failed grade and again bypassing the GMP. The new VMT (vehicle miles travelled)
system became effective on July 1, 2020, WELL AFTER the application for Marja
Acres was complete.
Now in order to mitigate traffic, it is being proposed that the segment between
Tamarack and Cannon Rd be exempted instead of denying the development,. And to
make things more interesting, a proposal is being made by staff to mitigate the extra
650 cars brought by the new development, they would like for the developer, New
Urban West to help pay for the extension of College to Faraday!!! This is
outrageous, since traffic coming from College southbound to Cannon, NEVER affects
the SB segment of El Camino Real between Tamarack and Cannon Rd. To use any
money by this developer to help extend that roadway (College to Faraday) is not in
any way mitigating for our segment and the additional traffic there.
Best to use some developer money to extend the left turn pocket lane at Kelly and NB
El Camino Real, since all Marja Acres will be approaching their homes from north El
Camino Real.
thank you.
Kris
40 year resident of Loma Laguna.
-- Kris Wrightkriswrt222@gmail.com
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Prepared By:
Exhibit 6
Ctyof
lsbad
Kimley >>> Horn
2 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Table of Contents
Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 3
Analysis Methodology ................................................................................................................ 3
Figure 1- Data Collection Locations ........................................................................................ 5
Figure 2- Roadway Peak Volumes .......................................................................................... 6
Analysis Results ......................................................................................................................... 7
Table 1 – New Methodology Roadway Volume and Level of Service AM/PM ............................... 8
Figure 3- New Methodology Roadway Level of Service Summary ..............................................12
Upcoming Projects and Recommendations ...................................................................................13
North Coast Corridor Public Works Plan ................................................................................13
Appendix .................................................................................................................................14
Appendix A...........................................................................................................................15
Figure 4 - Unadjusted Capacity Methodology Roadway Level of Service Summary .......................16
Table 2 – Comparing LOS from New Methodology and Unadjusted Capacity ..............................17
Appendix B ...........................................................................................................................18
Appendix C ...........................................................................................................................19
3 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Introduction
This document summarizes the Level of Service (LOS) analysis of 43 roadway segments in the City of
Carlsbad. The LOS analysis is used to provide qualitative evaluation based on quantitative calculations of
roadway performance. Results of the LOS analysis can identify potential Traffic Signal Management
solutions to improve traffic flow, be used to evaluate traffic conditions in future environmental
documents and monitor transportation facilities as required by the Growth Management Program
(GMP).
New State laws, updates to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s
Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines, all established that auto delay methodologies cannot be
used to define environmental impacts related to new developments. Instead, all analyses should be
consistent with the most recent version of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM).
The City of Carlsbad has previously used planning-level capacities to associate a daily volume with a level
of service on roadway segments, using a constant value commonly set at 1,800 vehicles per hour (vph)
per lane. This methodology was inconsistent with the HCM as it did not account for typical roadway
factors such as signal spacing or lost time — all of which reduce capacity. As a result, the unadjusted
capacity methodology did not adequately reflect actual roadway conditions.
The City’s new methodology evaluates roadway facilities using roadway segment capacities adjusted
based on specific characteristics of the roadway and quantified using ARTPLAN software consistent with
Volume 3 of the HCM, as documented in Carlsbad Roadway Capacity Tables. These capacities consider
roadway geometry and operational factors such as type of facility, number of lanes, cycle length,
distance between intersections, number of lanes, posted speed limit, and roadway type (e.g. divided or
undivided). The Roadway Capacity Tables better reflect actual field conditions and will be used for the
new City of Carlsbad TIA Guidelines and GMP monitoring.
Analysis Methodology
Data was collected by National Data and Surveying Services (NDS) along the study corridors on
Wednesday, May 1, 2019 and Tuesday, May 7, 2019 as well as follow up counts along Palomar Airport
Road from El Fuerte to Melrose Road and El Camino Real between Tamarack and Cannon from Tuesday
September 17, 2019 through Thursday September 19, 2019. This represents typical weekday traffic
conditions. Counts were collected midblock at 15-minute increments for a 24-hour period each day. For
each roadway segment, the highest volume of the two days peak AM and PM periods were determined
by direction. The locations at which data was collected are presented in Figure 1. The highest peak
volumes at each location are presented in Figure 2.
The analysis was completed using this peak period data, comparing AM/PM peak volumes to the
Carlsbad Roadway Capacity Tables to determine LOS. The Appendix to this report includes an evaluation
between the new methodology in this report and the old methodology previously used by the City:
a)New Methodology: compares AM/PM peak volumes to the Carlsbad Roadway Capacity Tables to
determine LOS.
b) Unadjusted Capacity Methodology: determines LOS by comparing AM/PM peak volumes to the
unadjusted 1,800 vphpl
4 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
When calculating roadway LOS using the new methodology, a subsequent analysis may be necessary.
Per the HCM, a facility, comprised of smaller and contiguous segments between signalized intersections,
is reported as failing if the volume along any segment of that facility exceeds its capacity. To address this
situation, when a facility reaches LOS D conditions, a subsequent evaluation is conducted to determine if
either:
a)The volume of any one segment of the facility exceeds its capacity, and the facility should be
reported as LOS F; or
b) All segments of the facility have volumes under the reported capacity and the facility should
remain as LOS D.
The comparison in Appendix A is provided for informational purposes to demonstrate the magnitude of
change between the methodologies. A flow chart illustrating the subsequent evaluation methodology is
provided in Appendix B.
5 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Figure 1- Data Collection Locations
Legend
--studiied Roadways
Tube Count LocaU:cms (September 201'9')
• Tube Count Locat1irn1s (May 2019)
• C-0unts proviided by C[ty (after July, 1 2018)
Counts prov1ided by City (before July 1, 2018)
[ J Carilisbad Boundtnlies .. NOIRIB
0 0_5 1 2 ----=====::::JMiles
6 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Figure 2- Roadway Peak Volumes
Legend
Higlh,est Peak Vo lumes
Less Ulan 1,500
-1,501 -2000
-2,000 -2,500
-More than 2,500
L.J Co11r1sbad Bou nda riies
0 2 ------==========:::::i Miles D.5 1
i
"---• • •-•r1
. ,r•, lillH-■••1 ---
7 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Analysis Results
The peak direction capacity and resulting LOS from comparison of AM and PM volumes using the new
methodology are shown in Table 1. Results using the new methodology are summarized and illustrated
in Figure 3.
There was construction along Palomar Airport Road from Paseo del Norte to Armada and may explain
the low LOS for this roadway segment. Volumes may need to be verified at that location.
Using the new methodology, the results support the HCM statement (pages 16-27) that the Roadway
Capacity Tables are an appropriate tool for general planning purposes like GMP and determining
development-related environmental impacts. Since the Roadway Capacity Tables consider several
roadway operational factors, the new methodology captures a more realistic analysis of LOS.
8 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Table 1 – New Methodology Roadway Volume and Level of Service AM/PM
N/S
Streets
Count
Index No. Limits Lane/Posted Speed/Median Type Direction Peak Direction Capacity AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Typology Exempt A B C D E Volume LOS Volume LOS
El Camino
Real
1 City Limits to Marron Road
3/35/D NB ** ** ** ** 1400 1278 E 1770 F Arterial Street X 3/35/D SB ** ** ** ** 1400 1760 F 1495 F
2 Marron Road to Carlsbad Village Drive
3/35/D NB ** 140 2070 2520 ## 958 C 1314 C Arterial Street 3/35/D SB ** 140 2070 2520 ## 1454 C 1005 C
3 Carlsbad Village Drive to Tamarack Avenue
3/55/D NB 1930 2850 2900 ## ## 816 A 1604 A Arterial Street 3/55/D SB 1930 2850 2900 ## ## 1791 A 788 A
4 Tamarack Avenue to Cannon Road
3/55/D NB ** ** 2400 2800 ## 1332 C 2174 C Arterial Street 3/55/D SB ** ** 2400 2800 ## 2900 F 1354 C
5 Cannon Road to College Boulevard
3/55/D NB ** 1060 1860 ## ## 1484 C 3229 F Arterial Street X 3/55/D SB ** 2150 2900 ## ## 3118 F 1648 B
6 College Boulevard to Palomar Airport Road
3/55/D NB 270 2750 2940 ## ## 1326 B 1813 B Arterial Street 3/55/D SB 270 2750 2940 ## ## 1857 B 1631 B
7 Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble
3/55/D NB ** ** 1330 2510 2580 1534 D 1598 D Arterial Street X 3/55/D SB ** ** 1330 2510 2580 1715 D 1385 D
8 Camino Vida Roble to Poinsettia Lane
2/55/D NB ** 970 2020 2100 ## 1620 C 1406 C Arterial Street X 3/55/D SB ** 1470 2020 2900 ## 1510 C 1832 C
9 Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway-Alga Road
3/55/D NB ** ** 2100 2820 2900 1782 C 1709 C Arterial Street X 3/55/D SB ** ** 2100 2820 2900 1808 C 1920 C
10 Aviara Parkway-Alga Road to La Costa Avenue
3/55/D NB ** 1390 2580 ## ## 1840 C 2356 C Arterial Street X 3/55/D SB ** 800 1920 ## ## 2751 F 2373 F
11 La Costa Avenue to
Leucadia Boulevard
3/55/D NB ** ** 1880 2820 2880 1187 C 1763 C Arterial
Street 3/55/D SB ** ** 1880 2820 2880 1987 D 1404 C
9 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Table 1 – New Methodology Roadway Volume and Level of Service AM/PM
N/S
Streets
Count
Index No. Limits Lane/Posted Speed/Median Type Direction Peak Direction Capacity AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Typology Exempt A B C D E Volume LOS Volume LOS
College
Boulevard
12 City Limits to Carlsbad Village Drive
2/45/D NB ** ** 930 1680 1770 1018 D 1742 E Arterial Street 2/45/D SB ** ** 930 1680 1770 1674 D 991 D
13 Carlsbad Village Drive to Cannon Road
2/45/D NB ** ** 1040 1760 1800 699 C 1575 D Arterial Street 2/45/D SB ** ** 1040 1760 1800 1619 D 728 C
14 El Camino Real to
Aston Avenue
2/50/D NB ** ** 390 1440 1810 770 D 632 D Arterial Street 2/50/D SB ** ** 390 1440 1810 578 D 704 D
15 Aston Avenue to Palomar Airport Road
2/50/D NB 880 1680 ## ## ## 1147 B 583 A Arterial
Street 2/50/D SB 80 970 1040 ## ## 786 B 1160 F
Aviara
Parkway 16 Palomar Airport Road
to Poinsettia Lane
2/45/D NB ** ** ** 1130 1630 1057 D 497 D Arterial Street 2/45/D SB ** ** ** 1130 1630 428 D 842 D
Melrose
Drive
17 City Limits to Palomar
Airport Road
4/55/D NB ** ** 1710 2740 2830 1075 C 1672 C Arterial
Street 3/55/D SB ** ** ** 930 1630 1917 F 1198 E
18 Palomar Airport Rd to
Poinsettia Ln
3/55/D NB ** 490 2720 2880 ## 1630 C 1398 C Arterial
Street 3/55/D SB ** 490 2720 2880 ## 1352 C 1295 C
19 Poinsettia Ln to Rancho
Santa Fe Rd
3/55/D NB ** ** 1400 2100 ## 1380 C 950 C Arterial
Street 3/55/D SB ** ** 1400 2100 ## 846 C 1085 C
Rancho
Santa Fe
20 City Limits to Camino Junipero
3/55/D NB ** 2520 3160 ## ## 1323 B 2593 C Arterial
Street 3/55/D SB ** 2520 3160 ## ## 3156 C 1704 B
21 Camino Junipero to La Costa Avenue
3/55/D NB ** 1400 2660 2700 ## 1167 B 2017 C Arterial
Street 3/55/D SB ** 1400 2660 2700 ## 2545 C 1448 C
22 La Costa Avenue to
Calle Barcelona
3/50/D NB ** 460 2410 2480 ## 1090 C 2443 D Arterial Street 3/50/D SB ** 460 2410 2480 ## 2172 C 1250 C
23 Calle Barcelona to
Olivenhain Road
3/50/D NB ** 540 2810 3040 ## 1205 C 2186 C Arterial
Street 3/50/D SB ** 540 2810 3040 ## 2514 C 1704 C
10 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Table 1 – New Methodology Roadway Volume and Level of Service AM/PM
E/W
Streets
Count
Index
No.
Limits
Lane/Posted
Speed/
Median Type
Direction Peak Direction Capacity AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Typology Exempt
A B C D E Volume LOS Volume LOS
Cannon
Road
24 Avenida Encinas
to Paseo del
Norte
2/35/D EB ** ** ** 730 1320 1644 F 1029 E Arterial
Street 2/35/D WB ** ** ** 730 1320 907 E 1791 F
25 Paseo del Norte
to Car Country
2/50/D EB ** 390 1630 1770 1800 1323 C 851 C Arterial
Street 2/50/D WB ** 390 1630 1770 1800 752 C 1495 C
26 Car Country to
Legoland Dr
2/50/D EB ** 1170 1660 1700 ## 1252 C 963 B Arterial
Street 2/50/D WB ** 1170 1660 1700 ## 835 B 1465 C
27 Legoland Dr to
Faraday Ave
2/50/D EB ** 270 1280 1320 ## 1044 C 1303 D Arterial
Street 2/50/D WB ** 270 1280 1320 ## 1172 C 1096 C
28 Faraday Ave to El
Camino Real
2/50/D EB ** ** 1280 1620 ## 402 C 1148 C Arterial
Street 2/50/D WB ** ** 1280 1620 ## 1234 C 541 C
29 El Camino Real to College
Boulevard
2/50/D EB ** ** 280 1310 1690 813 D 1712 F Arterial Street X
2/50/D WB ** ** 280 1310 1690 1676 E 989 D
11 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Table 1 – New Methodology Roadway Volume and Level of Service AM/PM
E/W
Streets
Count
Index
No.
Limits
Lane/Posted
Speed/
Median Type
Direction Peak Direction Capacity AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Typology Exempt
A B C D E Volume LOS Volume LOS
Palomar
Airport
Road
30 Carlsbad Blvd to
Avenida Encinas
1/35/U EB ** 520 760 ## ## 229 B 192 B Arterial
Street 1/35/U WB ** 520 760 ## ## 414 B 484 B
311 Avenida Encinas
to Paso del Norte
3/35 D EB ** ** ** ** 250 1155 F 1304 F Arterial
Street X 2/35/D WB ** ** ** ** 650 1398 F 938 F
32 Paseo del Norte to Armada 3/45/D EB ** ** 1640 2660 2740 2343 D 1833 D Arterial
Street X 4/45/D WB ** ** 2250 3570 3680 2233 C 2620 D
33 Armada to Aviara
Pkwy
3/55/D EB ** 650 2760 2940 ## 2231 C 1656 C Arterial
Street X 3/55/D WB ** 650 2760 2940 ## 2272 C 2702 C
34 Aviara Pkwy to
Camino Vida
Roble
3/55/D EB 440 2720 2900 ## ## 1795 B 1326 B Arterial
Street 3/55/D WB 440 2720 2900 ## ## 1390 B 1831 B
35 Camino Vida Roble to El
Camino Real
3/55/D EB ** 790 2140 ## ## 1244 C 1636 C Arterial Street 3/55/D WB ** 790 2140 ## ## 1311 C 1311 C
36 El Camino Real to
El Fuerte
3/55/D EB ** 1290 2830 2900 ## 1768 C 2438 C Arterial Street X 3/55/D WB ** 1290 2830 2900 ## 2360 C 1922 C
37 El Fuerte to
Melrose Dr
3/55/D EB ** 1230 2860 2940 ## 1584 C 3005 F Arterial Street X 3/55/D WB ** 1230 2860 2940 ## 3247 F 1817 C
38 Melrose Dr to
City Limits
3/55/D EB ** 340 2590 2900 ## 1154 C 1933 C Arterial
Street 3/55/D WB ** 340 2590 2900 ## 1590 C 1173 C
La Costa
Avenue
39 Piraeus St to El
Camino Real
2/55/D EB ** 1450 1700 ## ## 1402 B 1668 C Arterial
Street X 2/55/D WB ** 1450 1700 ## ## 1703 F 1443 B
1 Segment exempt from Interstate-5 to Paseo Del Norte
12 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Figure 3- New Methodology Roadway Level of Service Summary
N/S Streets Count Index
No. Limits NB Peak
Volume
Level of
Service
SB Peak
Volume
Level of
Service
El Camino Real
1 City Limits to Marron Road 1770 F 1760 F
2 Marron Road to Carlsbad Village Drive 1314 C 1454 C 3 Carlsbad Village Drive to Tamarack Avenue 1561 A 1791 A
4 Tamarack Avenue to Cannon Road 2174 C 2900 F
5 Cannon Road to College Boulevard 3229 F 3118 F
6 College Boulevard to Palomar Airport Road 1813 B 1857 B
7 Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble 1598 D 1683 D
8 Camino Vida Roble to Poinsettia Lane 1620 C 1832 C
9 Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway-Alga Road 1782 C 1920 C
10 Aviara Parkway-Alga Road to La Costa Avenue 2271 C 2751 F
11 La Costa Avenue to Leucadia Boulevard 1679 C 1958 D
College Boulevard
12 City Limits to Carlsbad Village Drive 1734 E 1674 D
13 Carlsbad Village Drive to Cannon Road 1555 D 1619 D
14 El Camino Real to Aston Avenue 770 D 698 D
15 Aston Avenue to Palomar Airport Road 1147 B 1160 F
Aviara Parkway 16 Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia Lane 1057 D 842 D
Melrose Drive
17 City Limits to Palomar Airport Road 1672 C 1911 F
18 Palomar Airport Rd to Poinsettia Ln 1630 C 1310 C
19 Poinsettia Ln to Rancho Santa Fe Rd 1380 C 1085 C
Rancho Santa Fe
Road
20 City Limits to Camino Junipero 2593 C 3083 C 21 Camino Junipero to La Costa Avenue 2017 C 2514 C
22 La Costa Avenue to Calle Barcelona 2443 D 2172 C
23 Calle Barcelona to Olivenhain Road 2186 C 2514 C
E/W Streets Count Index No. Limits WB Peak Volume Level of Service EB Peak Volume Level of Service
Cannon Road
24 Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte 1791 F 1644 F
25 Paseo del Norte to Car Country 1495 C 1323 C
26 Car Country to Legoland Dr 1465 C 1252 C
27 Legoland Dr to Faraday Ave 1172 C 1303 D
28 Faraday Ave to El Camino Real 1234 C 1148 C
29 El Camino Real to College Boulevard 1676 E 1712 F
Palomar Airport
Road
30 Carlsbad Blvd to Avenida Encinas 484 B 229 B
31 Avenida Encinas to Paso del Norte 1398 F 1304 F
32 Paseo del Norte to Armada 2620 D 2343 D
33 Armada to Aviara Pkwy 2702 C 2231 C
34 Aviara Pkwy to Camino Vida Roble 1831 B 1795 B 35 Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real 1311 C 1636 C
36 El Camino Real to El Fuerte 2360 C 2438 C
37 El Fuerte to Melrose Dr 3247 F 3005 F
38 Melrose Dr to City Limits 1590 C 1933 C
La Costa Avenue 39 Piraeus St to El Camino Real 1703 F 1668 C
Legend
Level of Service
-A
-B,
-c
[}
-E
F
■ ■ ■ • Roadway Exempt
CJ Carlsbad Bo undari es
t
\
\,.n..
..&.
NURllH
D 2 ••••-========:::::i Mi1es 0.5 1
I i j ..... J
l., :
\. ....... , ') ... . . -·-Jc~-i
13 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Upcoming Projects and Recommendations
North Coast Corridor Public Works Plan
The Caltrans North Coastal Corridor Public Works Plan/Transportation and Resource Enhancement
Program provides highway, rail, transit, bike/pedestrian, environmental and coastal access
improvements along the 27-mile North Coast Corridor. This project includes realigning the Interstate 5
(I-5) southbound freeway ramp at Palomar Airport Road.
14 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Appendix
Appendix A – Unadjusted Capacity Methodology Roadway Level of Service
Appendix B – Evaluating Facility level of Service
Appendix C – Midblock Roadway Segment Counts
15 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Appendix A
Results of analysis using the unadjusted capacity of 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane for each roadway
segment was completed and included in this appendix for informational purposes.
Figure 4 presents and illustrates the results of this analysis. As anticipated, the results show an
optimistic but inaccurate representation of roadway operation as many of the roadway segments have a
LOS A.
Table 2 provides a comparison between the new HCM methodology and the previous unadjusted
capacity methodology for each directional roadway segment.
16 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Figure 4 - Unadjusted Capacity Methodology Roadway Level of Service Summary
N/S Streets Count Index
No. Limits NB Peak
Volume
Level of
Service
SB Peak
Volume
Level of
Service
El Camino Real
1 City Limits to Marron Road 1770 A 1760 A
2 Marron Road to Carlsbad Village Drive 1314 A 1454 A
3 Carlsbad Village Drive to Tamarack Avenue 1604 A 1791 A
4 Tamarack Avenue to Cannon Road 2174 A 2900 A
5 Cannon Road to College Boulevard 3229 D 3118 A
6 College Boulevard to Palomar Airport Road 1813 A 1857 A
7 Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble 1598 A 1715 A
8 Camino Vida Roble to Poinsettia Lane 1620 A 1832 A
9 Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway-Alga Rd 1782 A 1920 A
10 Aviara Parkway-Alga Road to La Costa Ave 2356 A 2751 C
11 La Costa Avenue to Leucadia Boulevard 1763 A 1987 A
College Boulevard
12 City Limits to Carlsbad Village Drive 1742 A 1674 A
13 Carlsbad Village Drive to Cannon Road 1575 A 1619 A
14 El Camino Real to Aston Avenue 770 A 704 A
15 Aston Avenue to Palomar Airport Road 1147 A 1160 A Aviara Parkway 16 Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia Lane 1057 A 842 A
Melrose Drive
17 City Limits to Palomar Airport Road 1672 A 1917 A
18 Palomar Airport Rd to Poinsettia Ln 1630 A 1352 A
19 Poinsettia Ln to Rancho Santa Fe Rd 1380 A 1085 A
Rancho Santa Fe Road
20 City Limits to Camino Junipero 2593 A 3156 A
21 Camino Junipero to La Costa Avenue 2017 A 2545 A
22 La Costa Avenue to Calle Barcelona 2443 A 2172 A
23 Calle Barcelona to Olivenhain Road 2186 A 2514 A
E/W Streets Count Index No. Limits WB Peak
Volume
Level of
Service
EB Peak
Volume
Level of
Service
Cannon Road
24 Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte 1791 A 1644 A
25 Paseo del Norte to Car Country 1495 A 1323 A
26 Car Country to Legoland Dr 1465 A 1252 A
27 Legoland Dr to Faraday Ave 1172 A 1303 A 28 Faraday Ave to El Camino Real 1234 A 1148 A
29 El Camino Real to College Boulevard 1676 A 1712 A
Palomar Airport
Road
30 Carlsbad Blvd to Avenida Encinas 484 A 229 A
31 Avenida Encinas to Paso del Norte 1398 A 1304 A
32 Paseo del Norte to Armada 2620 A 2343 A
33 Armada to Aviara Pkwy 2702 A 2231 A
34 Aviara Pkwy to Camino Vida Roble 1831 A 1795 A
35 Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real 1311 A 1636 A 36 El Camino Real to El Fuerte 2360 A 2438 A
37 El Fuerte to Melrose Dr 3247 A 3005 A
38 Melrose Dr to City Limits 1590 A 1933 A
La Costa Avenue 39 Piraeus St to El Camino Real 1703 A 1668 A
Legend
Level of S,ew ice
-A
-s
-c
-o
-E
-F
L.J Cartsbad Boundaries
.A NORTH
0 2 -----========:::i Miles
17 City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Table 2 – Comparing LOS from New Methodology and Unadjusted Capacity
N/S Streets
Count
Index No. Limits Old LOS Method New LOS Method
NB SB NB SB
El Camino Real
1 City Limits to Marron Road A A F F
2 Marron Road to Carlsbad Village Drive A A C C
3 Carlsbad Village Drive to Tamarack Avenue A A A A
4 Tamarack Avenue to Cannon Road A A C F
5 Cannon Road to College Boulevard D A F F
6 College Boulevard to Palomar Airport Road A A B B
7 Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble A A D D
8 Camino Vida Roble to Poinsettia Lane A A C C
9 Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway-Alga Rd A A C C
10 Aviara Parkway-Alga Road to La Costa Ave A C C F
11 La Costa Avenue to Leucadia Boulevard A A C D
College Boulevard
12 City Limits to Carlsbad Village Drive A A E D
13 Carlsbad Village Drive to Cannon Road A A D D
14 El Camino Real to Aston Avenue A A D D
15 Aston Avenue to Palomar Airport Road A A B F
Aviara Parkway 16 Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia Lane A A D D
Melrose Drive
17 City Limits to Palomar Airport Road A A C F
18 Palomar Airport Rd to Poinsettia Ln A A C C
19 Poinsettia Ln to Rancho Santa Fe Rd A A C C
Rancho Santa Fe
Road
20 City Limits to Camino Junipero A A C C
21 Camino Junipero to La Costa Avenue A A C C
22 La Costa Avenue to Calle Barcelona A A D C
23 Calle Barcelona to Olivenhain Road A A C C
E/W Streets Count
Index No. Limits Old LOS Method New LOS Method
WB EB WB EB
Cannon Road
24 Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte A A F F
25 Paseo del Norte to Car Country A A C C
26 Car Country to Legoland Dr A A C C
27 Legoland Dr to Faraday Ave A A C D
28 Faraday Ave to El Camino Real A A C C
29 El Camino Real to College Boulevard A A E F
Palomar Airport Road
30 Carlsbad Blvd to Avenida Encinas A A B B
31 Avenida Encinas to Paso del Norte A A F F
32 Paseo del Norte to Armada A A D D
33 Armada to Aviara Pkwy A A C C
34 Aviara Pkwy to Camino Vida Roble A A B B
35 Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real A A C C
36 El Camino Real to El Fuerte A A C C
37 El Fuerte to Melrose Dr A A F F
38 Melrose Dr to City Limits A A C C
La Costa Avenue 39 Piraeus St to El Camino Real A A F C
GM
P
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
TI
A
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
Co
ll
e
c
t
o
n
e
m
i
d
‐
b
l
o
c
k
co
u
n
t
o
n
e
a
c
h
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
b
e
i
n
g
m
o
ni
t
o
r
e
d
Co
ll
e
c
t
o
n
e
m
i
d
‐
b
l
o
c
k
co
u
n
t
o
n
e
a
c
h
se
gm
e
n
t
b
e
i
n
g
ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
d
EV
A
L
U
A
T
I
N
G
F
A
C
I
L
I
T
Y
L
E
V
E
L
O
F
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
(
L
O
S
)
Ad
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
vo
l
u
m
e
s
&
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
f
o
r
ea
c
h
sc
e
n
a
r
i
o
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
L
O
S
LO
S
=
A
LO
S
=
B
LO
S
=
C
LO
S
=
D
LO
S
=
E
LO
S
=
F
Co
l
l
e
c
t
o
n
e
m
i
d
‐
bl
o
c
k
co
u
n
t
f
o
r
ea
c
h
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
a
s
ne
e
d
e
d
i
f n
o
t
al
r
e
a
d
y
a
va
i
l
a
b
l
e
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
V
/
C
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
se
g
m
e
n
t
An
y
se
g
m
e
n
t
V/
C
>
1
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
LO
S
=
D
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
m
e
e
t
s
L
O
S
D
S
t
a
n
d
ar
d
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
m
e
e
t
L
O
S
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
n
o
t
m
e
e
t
LO
S
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
Do
c
u
m
e
n
t
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
L
O
S
.
F
o
r
e
a
c
h
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
r
e
c
o
r
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
L
O
S
D
a
l
so
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
h
i
g
h
e
s
t
V
/
C
ra
t
i
o
r
e
c
o
r
d
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
s
c
o
m
p
o
s
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
LO
S
=
F
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
YE
S
YE
S
NO
YE
S
YE
S
YE
S
YE
S
YE
S
Th
e
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
se
gm
e
n
t
vo
l
u
m
e
s
d
e
f
i
n
e
th
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
v
o
l
u
m
e
Ap
p
e
n
d
i
x
B
t
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
City of Carlsbad │Roadway Level of Service Analysis
February 2020
Appendix C
Thirty-nine (39) midblock roadway segment locations were identified by the City of Carlsbad to be
studied under the City’s Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program. Follow up counts along
Palomar Airport Road from El Fuerte to Melrose Road and El Camino Real between Tamarack and
Cannon were collected to verify data. Counts were collected midblock at 15-minute increments for a 24-
hour period each day.
Appendix C includes the following information for the 2018-2019 Traffic Monitoring Program Report:
•Day One 24-Hour Midblock Volume Report
•Day Two 24-Hour Midblock Volume Report
•Follow up 24-Hour Midblock Volume Report
•24-Hour Volume Plots
Midblock Roadway Segment Count Summary
Number Segment Segment Location Count Day(s) Count Dates(s)
1 El Camino Real City Limits to Marron Road Thursday April 4, 2019
2 El Camino Real Marron Road to Carlsbad Village Drive Wednesday April 3, 2019
3 El Camino Real Carlsbad Village Drive to Tamarack Avenue Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
4 El Camino Real Tamarack Avenue to Cannon Road Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
4a, 4b, 4c El Camino Real Tamarack Avenue to Cannon Road Monday-Friday September 16-20, 2019
5 El Camino Real Cannon Road to College Boulevard Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
6 El Camino Real College Boulevard to Palomar Airport Road Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
7 El Camino Real Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vida Roble Wednesday and Thursday May 1-2, 2019
8 El Camino Real Camino Vida Roble to Poinsettia Lane Tuesday May 22, 2018
9 El Camino Real Poinsettia Lane to Aviara Parkway-Alga Road Tuesday May 22, 2018
10 El Camino Real Aviara Parkway-Alga Road to La Costa Avenue Wednesday and Thursday May 1-2, 2019
11 El Camino Real La Costa Avenue to Leucadia Boulevard Wednesday and Thursday May 1-2, 2019
12 College Boulevard City Limits to Carlsbad Village Drive Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
13 College Boulevard Carlsbad Village Drive to Cannon Road Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
14 College Boulevard El Camino Real to Aston Avenue Wednesday and Thursday May 8-9, 2019
15 College Boulevard Aston Avenue to Palomar Airport Road Wednesday and Thursday May 8-9, 2019
16 Aviara Parkway Palomar Airport Road to Poinsettia Lane Wednesday and Thursday May 8-9, 2019
17 Melrose Drive City Limits to Palomar Airport Road Wednesday and Thursday May 1-2, 2019
18 Melrose Drive Palomar Airport Rd to Poinsettia Ln Wednesday and Thursday May 1-2, 2019
19 Melrose Drive Poinsettia Ln to Rancho Santa Fe Rd Wednesday and Thursday May 1-2, 2019
20 Rancho Santa Fe City Limits to Camino Junipero Wednesday and Thursday May 1-2, 2019
21 Rancho Santa Fe Camino Junipero to La Costa Avenue Wednesday and Thursday May 1-2, 2019
22 Rancho Santa Fe La Costa Avenue to Calle Barcelona Thursday March 14, 2019
23 Rancho Santa Fe Calle Barcelona to Olivenhain Road Thursday October 11, 2018
24 Cannon Road Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
25 Cannon Road Paseo del Norte to Car Country Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
26 Cannon Road Car Country to Legoland Dr Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
27 Cannon Road Legoland Dr to Faraday Ave Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
28 Cannon Road Faraday Ave to El Camino Real Wednesday and Thursday May 8-9, 2019
29 Cannon Road El Camino Real to College Boulevard Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
30 Palomar Airport Road Carlsbad Blvd to Avenida Encinas Wednesday and Thursday May 8-9, 2019
31 Palomar Airport Road Avenida Encinas to Paso del Norte Wednesday and Thursday May 8-9, 2019
Midblock Roadway Segment Count Summary
Number Segment Segment Location Count Day(s) Count Dates(s)
32 Palomar Airport Road Paseo del Norte to Armada Tuesday and Wednesday May 7-8, 2019
33 Palomar Airport Road Armada to Aviara Pkwy Wednesday and Thursday May 8-9, 2019
34 Palomar Airport Road Aviara Pkwy to Camino Vida Roble Wednesday and Thursday May 8-9, 2019
35 Palomar Airport Road Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real Wednesday and Thursday May 8-9, 2019
36 Palomar Airport Road El Camino Real to El Fuerte Wednesday March 20, 2019
37 Palomar Airport Road El Fuerte to Melrose Dr Tuesday and Wednesday September 10-11, 2019
38 Palomar Airport Road Melrose Dr to City Limits Wednesday and Thursday May 1-2, 2019
39 La Costa Avenue Piraeus St to El Camino Real Wednesday and Thursday May 1-2, 2019
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
1
El Camino Real
Between City Limits and Marron Road
15 Minute Volume Report
Day: Thursday
Date: 4/4/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Haymar Dr & Plaza Dr
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA19_ 4085_026
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB we TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB we TOTAL
00:00 58 39 97 12:00 311 383 694
00:15 37 36 73 12:15 266 334 600
00:30 41 38 79 U:30 367 347 714
00:45 21 157 32 145 53 302 12:45 345 1289 341 1405 686 2694
01:00 28 36 64 13:00 349 322 671
01:15 20 34 54 13:15 340 349 689
01:30 20 30 so 13:30 359 308 667
01:45 14 82 26 126 40 208 13:45 343 1391 311 1290 654 2681
02:00 9 24 33 14:00 363 299 662
02:15 6 23 29 14:15 352 289 641
02:30 6 26 32 14:30 398 288 686
02:45 14 35 29 102 43 137 14:45 331 1444 333 1209 664 265)
03:00 6 19 25 15:00 367 352 719
03:15 10 18 28 15:15 368 349 717
03:30 17 26 43 15:30 402 373 775
03:45 12 45 27 90 39 135 15:45 447 1584 358 1432 805 3016
04:00 14 34 48 16:00 401 343 744
04:15 15 34 49 16:15 462 407 869
04:30 17 71 88 16:30 436 340 776
04:45 38 84 70 209 108 293 16:45 422 1721 392 1482 814 3203
05:00 40 60 100 17:00 450 356 806
05:15 37 106 143 17:15 435 356 791
05:30 so 162 212 17:30 457 322 779
05:45 73 200 189 517 262 717 17:45 413 1755 343 1377 756 3132
06:00 103 148 251 18:00 407 347 754
06:15 97 242 339 18:15 397 324 721
06:30 144 367 511 18:30 319 314 633
06:45 126 470 418 1175 544 1645 18:45 333 1456 286 1271 619 2727
07:00 190 379 569 19:00 303 274 '577
07:15 160 446 606 19:15 317 267 584
07:30 205 469 674 1.9:30 282 257 539
07:45 191 746 454 1748 645 2494 19:45 287 1189 223 1021 510 2210
08:00 219 391 610 20:00 296 215 511
08:15 205 409 614 20:15 254 204 458
08:30 172 364 536 20:30 226 165 391
08:45 192 788 292 1456 484 2244 20:45 225 1001 185 769 410 1770
09:00 214 301 515 21:00 298 157 455
09:15 203 262 465 21:15 191 164 ass
09:30 250 300 550 21:30 161 135 296
09:45 227 894 324 1187 551 2081 21:45 162 812 134 590 296 1402
10:00 256 288 544 22:00 151 114 265
10:15 236 302 538 22:15 111 104 215
10:30 246 308 554 22:30 115 86 201
10:45 271 1009 303 1201 574 2210 22:45 115 492 83 387 198 879
11:00 269 322 591 23:00 97 76 173
11:15 297 319 616 23:15 80 45 125
11:30 315 327 642 23:30 49 58 107
11:45 334 1215 356 1324 690 2539 23:45 77 303 39 218 116 521
TOTALS 5725 9280 15005 TOTALS 14437 12451 26888
SPLIT '¼ 38.2% 61.8% 35.8'¼ SPLIT'¼ 53.7% 46.3% 64.2'¼
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Peak Hour ll:4S 07:1S 11:4S PM Peak Hour 16:15 16:15 16:15
AM Pk Volume 1278 1760 2698 PM Pk Volume 1770 1495 3265
Pk Hr Factor 0.871 0.938 0.945 Pk Hr factor 0.958 0.918 0.939
7-9Volume 1534 3204 4738 4-6Volume 3476 2859 6335
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:15 16:15 16:15
7 -9 Pk Volume 820 1760 2543 4 • 6 Pk Volume 1770 1495 3265
Pk Hr factor 0.936 0.938 Q.943 Pk Hr factor 0.958 0.918 0.939
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
2
El Camino Real
Between Marron Road and Carlsbad Village Drive
15 Minute Volume Report
Day: Wednesday
Date: 4/3/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Marron Rd & Hosp Way
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA19_ 4085_027
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 15 21 36 12:00 258 217 475
00:15 14 15 29 12:15 237 246 483
00:30 9 7 16 12:30 229 219 448
00:45 13 51 11 54 24 105 12:45 216 940 260 942 476 1882
01:00 9 7 16 13:00 193 216 409
01:15 8 5 13 13:15 244 214 458
01:30 7 s 12 13:30 211 226 437
01:45 5 29 4 21 9 so 13:45 227 875 233 889 460 1764
02:00 u 10 21 14:00 211 245 456
02:15 3 6 9 14:15 228 193 421
02:30 4 7 11 14:30 281 224 505
02:45 7 25 13 36 20 61 14:45 298 1018 206 868 504 1886
03:00 1 11 12 15:00 269 225 494
03:15 5 11 16 15:15 242 192 434
03:30 10 19 29 15:30 300 234 534
03:45 4 20 24 65 28 85 15:45 334 1145 208 859 542 2004
04:00 9 10 19 16:00 320 190 510
04:15 8 19 27 16:15 335 245 580
04:30 16 46 62 16:30 325 197 522
04:45 28 61 45 120 73 181 16:45 312 1292 228 860 540 2152
05:00 18 39 57 17:00 319 252 571
05:15 38 65 103 17:15 315 287 602
05:30 35 134 169 17:30 339 238 577
05:45 55 146 158 396 213 542 17:45 284 1257 204 981 488 2238
06:00 69 133 202 18:00 268 195 463
06:15 63 190 253 18:15 237 185 422
06:30 99 315 414 18:30 228 196 424
06:45 94 •325 342 980 436 1305 18:45 207 940 183 759 390 1699
07:00 126 321 447 19:00 200 167 367
07:15 114 348 462 19:15 161 141 302
07:30 152 409 561 19:30 160 157 317
07:45 155 547 369 1447 524 1994 19:45 135 656 132 597 267 1253
08:00 164 328 492 20:00 153 131 284
08:15 158 290 448 20:15 111 120 231
08:30 148 233 381 20:30 106 118 224
08:45 160 630 241 1092 401 1722 20:45 108 478 83 452 191 930
09:00 157 193 350 21:00 104 124 228
09:15 174 196 370 21:15 106 98 . 204
09:30 162 193 355 21:30 95 84 179
09:45 174 667 175 757 349 1424 21:45 85 3.90 67 373 152 763
10:00 211 166 377 22:00 67 54 121
10:15 186 168 354 22:15 59 64 123
10:30 193 167 360 22:30 55 37 92
10:45 219 809 176 677 395 1486 22:45 51 232 42 197 93 429
11:00 202 201 403 23:00 56 33 89
11:15 239 203 442 23:15 35 30 65
11:30 220 187 407 23:30 20 19 39
11:45 234 895 188 779 422 1674 23:45 16 127 29 111 45 238
TOTALS 4205 6424 10629 TOTALS 93S0 7888 17238
SPLIT% 39.6% 60.4% 38.1% SPLIT % 54.2% 45.8% 61.9%
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:15 07:15 PM Peak Hour 15:45 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Vo.lume 958 1454 2039 PM Pk Volume 1314 1005 2290
Pk Hr Factor 0.928 0.889 0.909 Pk Hr Factor 0.981 0,875_ 0.951
7-9Volume 1177 2539 3716 4-l>Volume 2549 1841 4390
7 -9 Peak Hour 08:00 07:15 07:15 4-6 Peak Hour 16:00 16:45 16:4S-
7 -9 Pk Volume 630 1454 2039 4 • 6 Pk Volume 1292 1005 2290
Pk Hr Factor 0.960 0.889 0.909 Pk Hr Factor 0.964 0.875 0.951
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
3
El Camino Real
Between Carlsbad Village Drive and Tamarack Avenue
15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_001
NB SB EB WB
12,698 12,537 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 13 13 26 222 153 375 00:15 16 7 23 215 158 37300:30 11 10 21 157 199 35600:45 4 44 3 33 7 77 173 767 178 688 351 145501:00 10 5 15 188 167 35501:15 7 5 12 180 172 35201:30 8 7 15 201 209 41001:45 6 31 2 19 8 50 198 767 184 732 382 149902:00 5 5 10 193 149 342 02:15 2 4 6 236 211 447 02:30 5 4 9 253 216 469 02:45 5 17 5 18 10 35 344 1026 196 772 540 179803:00 3 9 12 301 165 466 03:15 2 7 9 367 177 544 03:30 7 15 22 335 181 516 03:45 5 17 22 53 27 70 370 1373 190 713 560 208604:00 6 22 28 346 166 512 04:15 8 19 27 396 178 574 04:30 11 55 66 390 172 562 04:45 25 50 59 155 84 205 376 1508 191 707 567 221505:00 13 37 50 386 193 579 05:15 23 66 89 409 158 567 05:30 17 134 151 367 139 506 05:45 24 77 182 419 206 496 347 1509 159 649 506 215806:00 49 128 177 287 130 417 06:15 47 180 227 241 140 381 06:30 57 303 360 207 107 314 06:45 96 249 452 1063 548 1312 186 921 102 479 288 140007:00 218 377 595 153 95 248 07:15 179 483 662 135 104 239 07:30 128 475 603 107 75 182 07:45 132 657 456 1791 588 2448 113 508 69 343 182 85108:00 129 373 502 78 81 159 08:15 140 316 456 93 68 161 08:30 126 290 416 73 86 159 08:45 138 533 311 1290 449 1823 73 317 50 285 123 60209:00 144 178 322 63 58 121 09:15 136 187 323 59 64 123 09:30 133 188 321 47 51 98 09:45 135 548 196 749 331 1297 46 215 54 227 100 44210:00 144 146 290 28 23 51 10:15 129 138 267 39 26 65 10:30 143 143 286 52 23 75 10:45 150 566 130 557 280 1123 35 154 22 94 57 24811:00 169 147 316 41 14 55 11:15 189 161 350 25 14 39 11:30 176 162 338 19 12 31 11:45 203 737 178 648 381 1385 22 107 13 53 35 160
TOTALS 3526 6795 10321 9172 5742 14914
SPLIT %34.2%65.8%40.9%61.5%38.5%59.1%
NB SB EB WB
12,698 12,537 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:30 07:00 07:00 16:30 14:15 16:15
AM Pk Volume 816 1791 2448 1561 788 2282
Pk Hr Factor 0.919 0.927 0.924 0.954 0.912 0.985
7 - 9 Volume 1190 3081 0 0 4271 3017 1356 0 0 4373
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 07:00 16:30 16:15 16:15
7 - 9 Pk Volume 657 1791 0 0 2448 1561 734 0 0 2282
Pk Hr Factor 0.753 0.927 0.000 0.000 0.924 0.954 0.951 0.000 0.000 0.985
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total25,235
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
El Camino Real Bet. Carlsbad Village Dr & Tamarack Ave
21:3021:4522:00
Total25,235
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_001
NB SB EB WB
12,819 12,112 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 10 10 20 210 145 355 00:15 14 10 24 201 177 37800:30 8 5 13 199 183 38200:45 13 45 6 31 19 76 193 803 215 720 408 152301:00 7 3 10 184 183 36701:15 3 3 6 185 166 35101:30 8 2 10 188 203 39101:45 8 26 4 12 12 38 182 739 180 732 362 147102:00 8 6 14 200 171 371 02:15 4 4 8 220 145 365 02:30 5 7 12 289 180 469 02:45 6 23 4 21 10 44 339 1048 195 691 534 173903:00 1 2 3 270 152 422 03:15 2 6 8 303 177 480 03:30 6 19 25 325 148 473 03:45 8 17 27 54 35 71 397 1295 165 642 562 193704:00 2 24 26 368 161 529 04:15 9 21 30 399 164 563 04:30 11 47 58 386 154 540 04:45 20 42 62 154 82 196 387 1540 172 651 559 219105:00 23 39 62 428 166 594 05:15 21 76 97 403 163 566 05:30 23 128 151 376 178 554 05:45 32 99 181 424 213 523 363 1570 155 662 518 223206:00 48 121 169 270 113 383 06:15 46 189 235 282 125 407 06:30 70 312 382 185 104 289 06:45 108 272 414 1036 522 1308 188 925 131 473 319 139807:00 217 362 579 152 94 246 07:15 154 430 584 146 92 238 07:30 115 441 556 109 66 175 07:45 143 629 505 1738 648 2367 110 517 89 341 199 85808:00 124 348 472 107 60 167 08:15 136 361 497 79 89 168 08:30 125 241 366 77 51 128 08:45 125 510 241 1191 366 1701 91 354 64 264 155 61809:00 121 195 316 73 73 146 09:15 144 179 323 75 49 124 09:30 141 153 294 67 40 107 09:45 149 555 171 698 320 1253 42 257 51 213 93 47010:00 148 154 302 47 38 85 10:15 105 147 252 40 18 58 10:30 167 137 304 42 25 67 10:45 177 597 167 605 344 1202 32 161 14 95 46 25611:00 133 146 279 38 21 59 11:15 180 145 325 19 17 36 11:30 178 140 318 19 8 27 11:45 202 693 179 610 381 1303 26 102 8 54 34 156
TOTALS 3508 6574 10082 9311 5538 14849
SPLIT %34.8%65.2%40.4%62.7%37.3%59.6%
NB SB EB WB
12,819 12,112 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:00 07:00 16:30 12:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 812 1738 2367 1604 767 2273
Pk Hr Factor 0.967 0.860 0.913 0.937 0.892 0.957
7 - 9 Volume 1139 2929 0 0 4068 3110 1313 0 0 4423
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 07:00 16:30 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 629 1738 0 0 2367 1604 679 0 0 2273
Pk Hr Factor 0.725 0.860 0.000 0.000 0.913 0.937 0.954 0.000 0.000 0.957
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Carlsbad Village Dr & Tamarack Ave
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total24,931
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total24,931
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_001 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019El Camino Real Bet. Carlsbad Village Dr &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_001 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Carlsbad Village Dr &
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 4
Location: El Camino Real
Between Tamarack Avenue and Cannon Road
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_002
NB SB EB WB
22,777 20,548 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 32 9 41 410 227 637 00:15 22 7 29 333 266 59900:30 11 10 21 292 251 54300:45 10 75 3 29 13 104 333 1368 297 1041 630 240901:00 15 12 27 311 274 58501:15 10 7 17 304 355 65901:30 19 8 27 313 361 67401:45 11 55 6 33 17 88 334 1262 269 1259 603 252102:00 7 7 14 402 244 646 02:15 5 9 14 437 264 701 02:30 9 9 18 528 335 863 02:45 7 28 12 37 19 65 519 1886 440 1283 959 316903:00 4 6 10 520 291 811 03:15 4 10 14 559 288 847 03:30 11 23 34 544 290 834 03:45 8 27 39 78 47 105 637 2260 316 1185 953 344504:00 12 36 48 732 244 976 04:15 10 46 56 719 283 1002 04:30 13 82 95 730 226 956 04:45 25 60 115 279 140 339 786 2967 306 1059 1092 402605:00 14 89 103 801 250 1051 05:15 24 115 139 812 263 1075 05:30 21 204 225 674 237 911 05:45 38 97 378 786 416 883 716 3003 199 949 915 395206:00 67 206 273 559 192 751 06:15 66 331 397 448 194 642 06:30 86 411 497 357 182 539 06:45 213 432 619 1567 832 1999 363 1727 161 729 524 245607:00 379 675 1054 320 123 443 07:15 295 710 1005 292 114 406 07:30 191 810 1001 234 105 339 07:45 219 1084 817 3012 1036 4096 265 1111 95 437 360 154808:00 166 764 930 165 94 259 08:15 211 631 842 176 118 294 08:30 205 506 711 196 109 305 08:45 221 803 562 2463 783 3266 158 695 86 407 244 110209:00 225 413 638 120 76 196 09:15 186 405 591 106 81 187 09:30 207 338 545 108 71 179 09:45 202 820 312 1468 514 2288 83 417 62 290 145 70710:00 214 241 455 85 41 126 10:15 227 264 491 77 34 111 10:30 263 231 494 96 23 119 10:45 225 929 241 977 466 1906 69 327 28 126 97 45311:00 272 221 493 93 21 114 11:15 264 208 472 53 22 75 11:30 258 272 530 55 23 78 11:45 297 1091 264 965 561 2056 52 253 23 89 75 342
TOTALS 5501 11694 17195 17276 8854 26130
SPLIT %32.0%68.0%39.7%66.1%33.9%60.3%
NB SB EB WB
22,777 20,548 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:15 07:00 16:30 14:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1332 3101 4096 3129 1354 4174
Pk Hr Factor 0.812 0.949 0.972 0.963 0.769 0.956
7 - 9 Volume 1887 5475 0 0 7362 5970 2008 0 0 7978
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:15 07:00 16:30 16:15 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1084 3101 0 0 4096 3129 1065 0 0 4174
Pk Hr Factor 0.715 0.949 0.000 0.000 0.972 0.963 0.870 0.000 0.000 0.956
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total43,325
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Jackspar Dr
21:3021:4522:00
Total43,325
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_002
NB SB EB WB
20,586 20,225 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 37 12 49 320 233 553 00:15 12 12 24 280 246 52600:30 19 9 28 261 294 55500:45 14 82 7 40 21 122 265 1126 285 1058 550 218401:00 9 10 19 321 287 60801:15 9 5 14 269 258 52701:30 12 6 18 284 344 62801:45 11 41 4 25 15 66 328 1202 313 1202 641 240402:00 9 5 14 353 268 621 02:15 12 8 20 386 279 665 02:30 3 11 14 526 337 863 02:45 9 33 12 36 21 69 522 1787 404 1288 926 307503:00 5 7 12 422 291 713 03:15 5 9 14 476 311 787 03:30 14 28 42 536 272 808 03:45 11 35 48 92 59 127 590 2024 283 1157 873 318104:00 7 33 40 599 268 867 04:15 10 56 66 686 256 942 04:30 16 79 95 662 252 914 04:45 20 53 128 296 148 349 669 2616 275 1051 944 366705:00 20 86 106 709 245 954 05:15 25 131 156 689 241 930 05:30 30 243 273 616 273 889 05:45 44 119 370 830 414 949 572 2586 211 970 783 355606:00 63 214 277 492 216 708 06:15 73 287 360 420 186 606 06:30 101 396 497 359 173 532 06:45 163 400 603 1500 766 1900 304 1575 168 743 472 231807:00 217 560 777 249 131 380 07:15 184 737 921 246 117 363 07:30 192 745 937 199 97 296 07:45 262 855 788 2830 1050 3685 182 876 119 464 301 134008:00 332 657 989 169 97 266 08:15 209 587 796 162 138 300 08:30 195 576 771 143 130 273 08:45 193 929 523 2343 716 3272 137 611 90 455 227 106609:00 189 374 563 161 101 262 09:15 217 337 554 122 72 194 09:30 215 316 531 82 70 152 09:45 186 807 315 1342 501 2149 76 441 79 322 155 76310:00 192 283 475 84 36 120 10:15 193 257 450 72 29 101 10:30 199 229 428 75 35 110 10:45 257 841 275 1044 532 1885 58 289 33 133 91 42211:00 221 218 439 68 22 90 11:15 259 210 469 40 16 56 11:30 274 241 515 40 14 54 11:45 308 1062 269 938 577 2000 48 196 14 66 62 262
TOTALS 5257 11316 16573 15329 8909 24238
SPLIT %31.7%68.3%40.6%63.2%36.8%59.4%
NB SB EB WB
20,586 20,225 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:30 07:15 07:15 16:30 14:30 16:15
AM Pk Volume 1182 2927 3897 2729 1343 3754
Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0.929 0.928 0.962 0.831 0.984
7 - 9 Volume 1784 5173 0 0 6957 5202 2021 0 0 7223
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:15 16:30 16:00 16:15
7 - 9 Pk Volume 998 2927 0 0 3897 2729 1051 0 0 3754
Pk Hr Factor 0.752 0.929 0.000 0.000 0.928 0.962 0.955 0.000 0.000 0.984
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Jackspar Dr
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total40,811
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total40,811
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_002 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_002 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave &
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 4a, 4b, 4c
Location: El Camino Real
Between Tamarack Avenue and Kelly Drive
Between Keely Drive and Lisa Street Between Crestview Drive and Cannon Road
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
15 Minute Volume Report Day 3 15 Minute Volume Report Day 4
15 Minute Volume Report Day 5
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2 24-Hour Volume Plot Day 3
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 4
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 5
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_001
NB SB EB WB
0 0 14,726 13,662
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 14 11 25 158 224 382 00:15 9 12 21 180 195 37500:30 6 7 13 279 213 49200:45 4 33 8 38 12 71 290 907 181 813 471 172001:00 5 8 13 189 189 37801:15 4 4 8 194 202 39601:30 4 4 8 240 194 43401:45 4 17 6 22 10 39 208 831 198 783 406 161402:00 4 5 9 188 209 397 02:15 2 3 5 226 244 470 02:30 7 3 10 251 293 544 02:45 6 19 4 15 10 34 192 857 353 1099 545 195603:00 4 6 10 194 255 449 03:15 7 5 12 179 284 463 03:30 12 0 12 219 335 554 03:45 25 48 6 17 31 65 211 803 404 1278 615 208104:00 16 1 17 181 383 564 04:15 22 5 27 205 394 599 04:30 57 11 68 210 402 612 04:45 83 178 20 37 103 215 205 801 448 1627 653 242805:00 57 9 66 179 459 638 05:15 93 21 114 191 453 644 05:30 149 29 178 167 419 586 05:45 211 510 44 103 255 613 170 707 359 1690 529 239706:00 128 52 180 165 321 486 06:15 170 56 226 157 281 438 06:30 299 86 385 144 238 382 06:45 419 1016 120 314 539 1330 132 598 211 1051 343 164907:00 495 261 756 127 183 310 07:15 572 179 751 124 152 276 07:30 688 149 837 98 151 249 07:45 658 2413 150 739 808 3152 101 450 113 599 214 104908:00 473 152 625 73 76 149 08:15 404 106 510 82 105 187 08:30 414 124 538 88 74 162 08:45 295 1586 134 516 429 2102 52 295 98 353 150 64809:00 281 145 426 64 108 172 09:15 212 132 344 54 71 125 09:30 208 139 347 54 86 140 09:45 188 889 144 560 332 1449 50 222 90 355 140 57710:00 153 145 298 41 79 120 10:15 193 140 333 19 47 66 10:30 176 158 334 28 62 90 10:45 168 690 164 607 332 1297 22 110 36 224 58 33411:00 180 140 320 13 46 59 11:15 153 198 351 14 25 39 11:30 166 173 339 10 21 31 11:45 200 699 195 706 395 1405 10 47 24 116 34 163
TOTALS 8098 3674 11772 6628 9988 16616
SPLIT %68.8%31.2%41.5%39.9%60.1%58.5%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 14,726 13,662
AM Peak Hour 07:00 11:45 07:00 12:30 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 2413 827 3152 952 1779 2547
Pk Hr Factor 0.877 0.923 0.941 0.821 0.969 0.975
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 3999 1255 5254 0 0 1508 3317 4825
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 07:00 16:00 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2413 739 3152 0 0 801 1779 2547
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.877 0.708 0.941 0.000 0.000 0.954 0.969 0.975
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
9/16/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Monday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Kelly Dr
21:3021:4522:00
Total28,388
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total28,388
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_001
NB SB EB WB
0 0 15,478 14,008
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 13 13 26 189 202 391 00:15 7 11 18 192 196 38800:30 9 14 23 214 184 39800:45 4 33 15 53 19 86 190 785 155 737 345 152201:00 4 4 8 202 200 40201:15 5 8 13 206 176 38201:30 4 11 15 239 194 43301:45 5 18 5 28 10 46 225 872 201 771 426 164302:00 8 2 10 188 225 413 02:15 9 8 17 231 265 496 02:30 3 5 8 279 306 585 02:45 7 27 7 22 14 49 297 995 308 1104 605 209903:00 4 3 7 191 284 475 03:15 9 4 13 174 277 451 03:30 12 1 13 197 341 538 03:45 26 51 5 13 31 64 200 762 448 1350 648 211204:00 11 7 18 232 374 606 04:15 23 5 28 202 414 616 04:30 50 14 64 205 437 642 04:45 84 168 19 45 103 213 208 847 545 1770 753 261705:00 57 12 69 207 466 673 05:15 92 16 108 186 474 660 05:30 172 23 195 158 455 613 05:45 182 503 30 81 212 584 181 732 405 1800 586 253206:00 139 50 189 183 425 608 06:15 172 62 234 166 331 497 06:30 314 58 372 138 243 381 06:45 490 1115 128 298 618 1413 117 604 174 1173 291 177707:00 476 265 741 124 159 283 07:15 648 157 805 140 156 296 07:30 697 147 844 126 132 258 07:45 713 2534 136 705 849 3239 174 564 149 596 323 116008:00 509 139 648 123 118 241 08:15 477 133 610 84 117 201 08:30 407 106 513 79 90 169 08:45 353 1746 147 525 500 2271 80 366 114 439 194 80509:00 243 125 368 96 90 186 09:15 230 149 379 83 79 162 09:30 199 138 337 59 62 121 09:45 210 882 126 538 336 1420 59 297 51 282 110 57910:00 179 138 317 36 56 92 10:15 182 166 348 34 41 75 10:30 183 153 336 27 61 88 10:45 171 715 152 609 323 1324 10 107 31 189 41 29611:00 170 173 343 22 47 69 11:15 186 164 350 11 28 39 11:30 151 193 344 19 19 38 11:45 190 697 229 759 419 1456 6 58 27 121 33 179
TOTALS 8489 3676 12165 6989 10332 17321
SPLIT %69.8%30.2%41.3%40.3%59.7%58.7%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 15,478 14,008
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:30 07:00 14:15 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 2567 820 3239 998 1940 2728
Pk Hr Factor 0.900 0.895 0.954 0.840 0.890 0.906
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4280 1230 5510 0 0 1579 3570 5149
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:00 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2567 705 3239 0 0 847 1940 2728
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.900 0.665 0.954 0.000 0.000 0.913 0.890 0.906
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total29,486
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Kelly Dr
Tuesday
9/17/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total29,486
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_001
NB SB EB WB
0 0 15,662 14,141
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 16 26 42 173 230 403 00:15 5 11 16 190 205 39500:30 7 7 14 189 219 40800:45 3 31 8 52 11 83 197 749 195 849 392 159801:00 4 12 16 195 183 37801:15 2 10 12 234 170 40401:30 2 4 6 190 191 38101:45 3 11 5 31 8 42 203 822 236 780 439 160202:00 7 8 15 204 269 473 02:15 1 3 4 225 266 491 02:30 11 3 14 301 328 629 02:45 7 26 3 17 10 43 319 1049 332 1195 651 224403:00 4 4 8 197 259 456 03:15 9 6 15 195 291 486 03:30 21 3 24 196 319 515 03:45 31 65 11 24 42 89 220 808 390 1259 610 206704:00 8 4 12 215 408 623 04:15 21 5 26 217 407 624 04:30 48 11 59 233 430 663 04:45 67 144 17 37 84 181 181 846 445 1690 626 253605:00 62 9 71 207 472 679 05:15 100 18 118 244 457 701 05:30 149 20 169 188 446 634 05:45 207 518 40 87 247 605 183 822 363 1738 546 256006:00 143 39 182 150 309 459 06:15 175 63 238 174 298 472 06:30 352 61 413 139 292 431 06:45 406 1076 146 309 552 1385 162 625 211 1110 373 173507:00 494 283 777 102 175 277 07:15 675 137 812 98 204 302 07:30 727 157 884 118 164 282 07:45 644 2540 145 722 789 3262 100 418 119 662 219 108008:00 534 156 690 81 127 208 08:15 510 153 663 105 105 210 08:30 479 141 620 76 103 179 08:45 384 1907 139 589 523 2496 79 341 105 440 184 78109:00 271 129 400 73 94 167 09:15 252 148 400 81 89 170 09:30 199 121 320 65 77 142 09:45 242 964 153 551 395 1515 38 257 71 331 109 58810:00 175 155 330 37 60 97 10:15 192 150 342 43 30 73 10:30 207 145 352 20 50 70 10:45 172 746 173 623 345 1369 19 119 35 175 54 29411:00 168 172 340 18 43 61 11:15 185 168 353 12 32 44 11:30 181 213 394 12 26 38 11:45 190 724 193 746 383 1470 12 54 23 124 35 178
TOTALS 8752 3788 12540 6910 10353 17263
SPLIT %69.8%30.2%42.1%40.0%60.0%57.9%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 15,662 14,141
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:45 07:00 14:00 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 2580 847 3262 1049 1820 2669
Pk Hr Factor 0.887 0.921 0.923 0.822 0.964 0.952
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4447 1311 5758 0 0 1668 3428 5096
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:30 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2580 722 3262 0 0 865 1820 2669
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.887 0.638 0.923 0.000 0.000 0.886 0.964 0.952
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total29,803
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Kelly Dr
Wednesday
9/18/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total29,803
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_001
NB SB EB WB
0 0 15,708 14,048
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 7 17 24 194 210 404 00:15 7 16 23 154 207 36100:30 11 14 25 236 204 44000:45 5 30 8 55 13 85 257 841 183 804 440 164501:00 3 3 6 230 214 44401:15 2 5 7 219 241 46001:30 5 6 11 234 213 44701:45 7 17 11 25 18 42 232 915 222 890 454 180502:00 4 6 10 179 243 422 02:15 7 8 15 197 253 450 02:30 5 5 10 279 305 584 02:45 4 20 4 23 8 43 282 937 280 1081 562 201803:00 8 2 10 212 272 484 03:15 13 1 14 207 318 525 03:30 16 3 19 225 364 589 03:45 26 63 7 13 33 76 211 855 399 1353 610 220804:00 15 10 25 208 399 607 04:15 26 5 31 207 413 620 04:30 48 11 59 223 398 621 04:45 64 153 21 47 85 200 219 857 474 1684 693 254105:00 63 11 74 223 445 668 05:15 91 19 110 186 446 632 05:30 152 26 178 226 450 676 05:45 197 503 30 86 227 589 203 838 430 1771 633 260906:00 138 47 185 168 307 475 06:15 201 50 251 159 272 431 06:30 329 52 381 126 245 371 06:45 422 1090 110 259 532 1349 118 571 204 1028 322 159907:00 524 270 794 139 182 321 07:15 721 162 883 109 196 305 07:30 726 150 876 122 149 271 07:45 628 2599 138 720 766 3319 92 462 134 661 226 112308:00 552 142 694 69 106 175 08:15 473 139 612 80 113 193 08:30 389 140 529 77 110 187 08:45 359 1773 154 575 513 2348 78 304 100 429 178 73309:00 254 123 377 77 97 174 09:15 222 138 360 82 79 161 09:30 214 160 374 63 58 121 09:45 233 923 126 547 359 1470 59 281 50 284 109 56510:00 165 143 308 43 58 101 10:15 195 144 339 42 72 114 10:30 150 150 300 31 66 97 10:45 211 721 155 592 366 1313 20 136 36 232 56 36811:00 175 160 335 15 43 58 11:15 193 207 400 22 37 59 11:30 178 196 374 19 25 44 11:45 209 755 203 766 412 1521 8 64 18 123 26 187
TOTALS 8647 3708 12355 7061 10340 17401
SPLIT %70.0%30.0%41.5%40.6%59.4%58.5%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 15,708 14,048
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:45 07:00 14:30 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 2627 824 3319 980 1815 2669
Pk Hr Factor 0.905 0.981 0.940 0.869 0.957 0.963
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4372 1295 5667 0 0 1695 3455 5150
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:15 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2627 720 3319 0 0 872 1815 2669
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.905 0.667 0.940 0.000 0.000 0.978 0.957 0.963
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total29,756
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Kelly Dr
Thursday
9/19/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total29,756
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_001
NB SB EB WB
0 0 17,827 15,283
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 5 29 34 274 260 534 00:15 12 21 33 251 238 48900:30 10 12 22 234 208 44200:45 3 30 7 69 10 99 264 1023 189 895 453 191801:00 5 9 14 242 224 46601:15 5 10 15 277 258 53501:30 8 6 14 288 217 50501:45 5 23 6 31 11 54 291 1098 220 919 511 201702:00 6 6 12 295 261 556 02:15 4 8 12 346 316 662 02:30 11 6 17 421 333 754 02:45 8 29 4 24 12 53 410 1472 353 1263 763 273503:00 10 7 17 249 384 633 03:15 18 4 22 334 323 657 03:30 17 3 20 305 354 659 03:45 29 74 4 18 33 92 298 1186 409 1470 707 265604:00 14 5 19 264 421 685 04:15 20 3 23 257 438 695 04:30 51 13 64 263 451 714 04:45 84 169 22 43 106 212 255 1039 477 1787 732 282605:00 59 8 67 220 403 623 05:15 96 18 114 218 483 701 05:30 160 25 185 224 465 689 05:45 181 496 28 79 209 575 202 864 372 1723 574 258706:00 131 46 177 192 344 536 06:15 185 49 234 179 345 524 06:30 298 72 370 203 320 523 06:45 417 1031 105 272 522 1303 178 752 281 1290 459 204207:00 422 261 683 176 200 376 07:15 593 168 761 114 193 307 07:30 641 142 783 128 159 287 07:45 585 2241 144 715 729 2956 110 528 135 687 245 121508:00 514 152 666 98 138 236 08:15 438 138 576 89 112 201 08:30 352 110 462 111 99 210 08:45 337 1641 162 562 499 2203 96 394 84 433 180 82709:00 254 129 383 122 106 228 09:15 250 162 412 127 119 246 09:30 231 142 373 196 114 310 09:45 246 981 165 598 411 1579 170 615 80 419 250 103410:00 179 163 342 74 80 154 10:15 166 171 337 49 66 115 10:30 197 177 374 42 77 119 10:45 199 741 166 677 365 1418 45 210 65 288 110 49811:00 205 208 413 38 62 100 11:15 253 195 448 26 57 83 11:30 315 205 520 34 40 74 11:45 289 1062 232 840 521 1902 30 128 22 181 52 309
TOTALS 8518 3928 12446 9309 11355 20664
SPLIT %68.4%31.6%37.6%45.0%55.0%62.4%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 17,827 15,283
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:45 07:00 14:00 16:45 16:00
AM Pk Volume 2333 938 2956 1472 1828 2826
Pk Hr Factor 0.910 0.902 0.944 0.874 0.946 0.965
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 3882 1277 5159 0 0 1903 3510 5413
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:00 16:45 16:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2333 715 2956 0 0 1039 1828 2826
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.910 0.685 0.944 0.000 0.000 0.984 0.946 0.965
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total33,110
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Kelly Dr
Friday
9/20/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total33,110
Project #:CA19_4341_001 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/16/2019El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Kelly Dr
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_001 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/17/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Kelly Dr
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_001 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/18/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Kelly Dr
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_001 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/19/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Kelly Dr
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_001 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/20/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Tamarack Ave & Kelly Dr
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_002
NB SB EB WB
0 0 15,568 14,601
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 15 14 29 169 245 414 00:15 9 14 23 181 210 39100:30 6 7 13 289 232 52100:45 3 33 8 43 11 76 286 925 173 860 459 178501:00 6 8 14 194 206 40001:15 6 6 12 202 216 41801:30 4 5 9 262 209 47101:45 5 21 5 24 10 45 206 864 200 831 406 169502:00 4 4 8 168 226 394 02:15 2 3 5 218 320 538 02:30 6 3 9 287 300 587 02:45 7 19 5 15 12 34 243 916 334 1180 577 209603:00 4 6 10 194 280 474 03:15 8 5 13 186 295 481 03:30 13 0 13 229 363 592 03:45 25 50 6 17 31 67 241 850 420 1358 661 220804:00 16 1 17 195 429 624 04:15 26 4 30 213 406 619 04:30 61 12 73 232 444 676 04:45 85 188 18 35 103 223 212 852 501 1780 713 263205:00 61 8 69 177 496 673 05:15 98 23 121 198 500 698 05:30 155 23 178 192 484 676 05:45 213 527 39 93 252 620 170 737 388 1868 558 260506:00 152 53 205 180 361 541 06:15 165 59 224 173 313 486 06:30 282 83 365 134 259 393 06:45 443 1042 123 318 566 1360 144 631 217 1150 361 178107:00 478 264 742 126 190 316 07:15 584 199 783 115 167 282 07:30 728 185 913 96 169 265 07:45 697 2487 189 837 886 3324 95 432 120 646 215 107808:00 570 144 714 74 86 160 08:15 452 114 566 84 104 188 08:30 440 118 558 84 80 164 08:45 326 1788 137 513 463 2301 51 293 102 372 153 66509:00 297 152 449 63 107 170 09:15 247 139 386 49 81 130 09:30 235 140 375 49 88 137 09:45 197 976 154 585 351 1561 47 208 92 368 139 57610:00 173 156 329 40 78 118 10:15 209 136 345 22 51 73 10:30 218 156 374 27 64 91 10:45 201 801 182 630 383 1431 23 112 39 232 62 34411:00 190 160 350 11 40 51 11:15 177 202 379 15 25 40 11:30 193 173 366 8 22 30 11:45 212 772 200 735 412 1507 10 44 24 111 34 155
TOTALS 8704 3845 12549 6864 10756 17620
SPLIT %69.4%30.6%41.6%39.0%61.0%58.4%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 15,568 14,601
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:45 07:00 12:30 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 2579 887 3324 971 1981 2760
Pk Hr Factor 0.886 0.905 0.910 0.840 0.989 0.968
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4275 1350 5625 0 0 1589 3648 5237
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:00 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2579 837 3324 0 0 852 1981 2760
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.886 0.793 0.910 0.000 0.000 0.918 0.989 0.968
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
9/16/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Monday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
El Camino Real Bet. Kelly Dr & Lisa St
21:3021:4522:00
Total30,169
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total30,169
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_002
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,265 15,021
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 11 16 27 199 221 420 00:15 6 13 19 196 217 41300:30 9 13 22 221 195 41600:45 5 31 16 58 21 89 195 811 192 825 387 163601:00 4 5 9 211 195 40601:15 5 8 13 207 217 42401:30 5 11 16 247 197 44401:45 5 19 6 30 11 49 218 883 227 836 445 171902:00 7 1 8 195 272 467 02:15 7 8 15 212 279 491 02:30 4 5 9 337 300 637 02:45 4 22 5 19 9 41 320 1064 316 1167 636 223103:00 5 4 9 198 312 510 03:15 10 4 14 175 283 458 03:30 11 1 12 221 375 596 03:45 26 52 4 13 30 65 202 796 488 1458 690 225404:00 13 7 20 238 400 638 04:15 23 5 28 212 466 678 04:30 56 12 68 218 460 678 04:45 84 176 17 41 101 217 201 869 595 1921 796 279005:00 59 11 70 212 468 680 05:15 99 17 116 201 518 719 05:30 172 20 192 182 492 674 05:45 195 525 30 78 225 603 187 782 475 1953 662 273506:00 144 53 197 177 447 624 06:15 184 60 244 180 358 538 06:30 333 69 402 159 248 407 06:45 517 1178 128 310 645 1488 116 632 190 1243 306 187507:00 487 276 763 123 177 300 07:15 695 173 868 151 177 328 07:30 737 172 909 121 137 258 07:45 737 2656 192 813 929 3469 176 571 159 650 335 122108:00 619 131 750 122 142 264 08:15 521 138 659 84 124 208 08:30 435 116 551 73 94 167 08:45 386 1961 149 534 535 2495 71 350 115 475 186 82509:00 267 127 394 98 93 191 09:15 266 152 418 85 82 167 09:30 207 144 351 53 69 122 09:45 208 948 143 566 351 1514 56 292 55 299 111 59110:00 190 134 324 34 59 93 10:15 187 170 357 36 42 78 10:30 182 156 338 23 63 86 10:45 190 749 161 621 351 1370 14 107 33 197 47 30411:00 164 189 353 23 45 68 11:15 204 183 387 12 27 39 11:30 166 191 357 16 20 36 11:45 198 732 230 793 428 1525 8 59 29 121 37 180
TOTALS 9049 3876 12925 7216 11145 18361
SPLIT %70.0%30.0%41.3%39.3%60.7%58.7%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,265 15,021
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:45 07:00 14:15 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 2788 863 3469 1067 2073 2873
Pk Hr Factor 0.946 0.938 0.934 0.792 0.871 0.902
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4617 1347 5964 0 0 1651 3874 5525
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:00 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2788 813 3469 0 0 869 2073 2873
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.946 0.736 0.934 0.000 0.000 0.913 0.871 0.902
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total31,286
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Kelly Dr & Lisa St
Tuesday
9/17/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total31,286
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_002
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,564 15,244
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 12 22 34 190 252 442 00:15 6 11 17 193 208 40100:30 6 8 14 202 217 41900:45 3 27 7 48 10 75 216 801 209 886 425 168701:00 2 12 14 198 204 40201:15 3 11 14 241 199 44001:30 2 6 8 204 219 42301:45 2 9 5 34 7 43 197 840 261 883 458 172302:00 6 9 15 183 290 473 02:15 2 2 4 198 306 504 02:30 9 3 12 344 334 678 02:45 8 25 3 17 11 42 337 1062 347 1277 684 233903:00 3 5 8 210 293 503 03:15 10 5 15 195 282 477 03:30 20 3 23 209 349 558 03:45 31 64 7 20 38 84 224 838 433 1357 657 219504:00 8 4 12 236 411 647 04:15 21 5 26 227 451 678 04:30 55 10 65 237 459 696 04:45 70 154 16 35 86 189 205 905 483 1804 688 270905:00 64 9 73 217 499 716 05:15 108 20 128 251 498 749 05:30 152 18 170 202 518 720 05:45 212 536 39 86 251 622 183 853 403 1918 586 277106:00 150 41 191 152 358 510 06:15 200 63 263 163 333 496 06:30 365 67 432 163 322 485 06:45 430 1145 154 325 584 1470 163 641 225 1238 388 187907:00 487 283 770 107 200 307 07:15 742 146 888 106 216 322 07:30 826 193 1019 122 176 298 07:45 655 2710 184 806 839 3516 92 427 136 728 228 115508:00 677 137 814 83 133 216 08:15 551 164 715 102 116 218 08:30 528 163 691 84 109 193 08:45 412 2168 141 605 553 2773 81 350 111 469 192 81909:00 300 146 446 68 100 168 09:15 269 142 411 78 97 175 09:30 228 131 359 63 82 145 09:45 255 1052 161 580 416 1632 43 252 70 349 113 60110:00 190 157 347 37 62 99 10:15 199 158 357 38 35 73 10:30 216 169 385 21 53 74 10:45 182 787 180 664 362 1451 17 113 40 190 57 30311:00 176 190 366 16 47 63 11:15 184 183 367 12 31 43 11:30 192 227 419 13 24 37 11:45 202 754 199 799 401 1553 10 51 24 126 34 177
TOTALS 9431 4019 13450 7133 11225 18358
SPLIT %70.1%29.9%42.3%38.9%61.1%57.7%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,564 15,244
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:30 07:15 14:15 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 2900 886 3560 1089 1998 2873
Pk Hr Factor 0.878 0.879 0.873 0.791 0.964 0.959
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4878 1411 6289 0 0 1758 3722 5480
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:15 16:30 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2900 806 3560 0 0 910 1998 2873
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.878 0.712 0.873 0.000 0.000 0.906 0.964 0.959
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total31,808
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Kelly Dr & Lisa St
Wednesday
9/18/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total31,808
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_002
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,139 15,081
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 8 19 27 197 235 432 00:15 8 17 25 167 230 39700:30 12 12 24 243 202 44500:45 4 32 9 57 13 89 245 852 208 875 453 172701:00 3 3 6 228 257 48501:15 2 6 8 195 264 45901:30 5 6 11 287 230 51701:45 6 16 12 27 18 43 251 961 211 962 462 192302:00 4 6 10 189 259 448 02:15 6 8 14 199 261 460 02:30 5 5 10 299 314 613 02:45 4 19 4 23 8 42 290 977 301 1135 591 211203:00 8 2 10 212 293 505 03:15 15 1 16 199 331 530 03:30 15 1 16 227 404 631 03:45 28 66 6 10 34 76 222 860 411 1439 633 229904:00 15 9 24 214 440 654 04:15 26 5 31 223 454 677 04:30 47 11 58 244 422 666 04:45 70 158 19 44 89 202 228 909 525 1841 753 275005:00 67 10 77 223 467 690 05:15 99 20 119 201 506 707 05:30 158 23 181 232 506 738 05:45 195 519 30 83 225 602 207 863 463 1942 670 280506:00 149 53 202 193 352 545 06:15 202 56 258 155 294 449 06:30 330 48 378 123 267 390 06:45 423 1104 113 270 536 1374 111 582 206 1119 317 170107:00 529 274 803 132 200 332 07:15 710 181 891 113 199 312 07:30 721 174 895 118 168 286 07:45 625 2585 179 808 804 3393 96 459 148 715 244 117408:00 620 140 760 76 128 204 08:15 503 148 651 85 122 207 08:30 380 139 519 77 120 197 08:45 383 1886 153 580 536 2466 75 313 107 477 182 79009:00 260 127 387 76 90 166 09:15 242 139 381 85 86 171 09:30 243 164 407 60 63 123 09:45 227 972 135 565 362 1537 60 281 57 296 117 57710:00 178 137 315 38 62 100 10:15 193 145 338 40 65 105 10:30 162 162 324 29 65 94 10:45 232 765 175 619 407 1384 21 128 37 229 58 35711:00 161 191 352 14 54 68 11:15 200 208 408 24 37 61 11:30 198 205 403 18 22 40 11:45 207 766 233 837 440 1603 10 66 15 128 25 194
TOTALS 8888 3923 12811 7251 11158 18409
SPLIT %69.4%30.6%41.0%39.4%60.6%59.0%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,139 15,081
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:30 07:00 14:15 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 2676 903 3393 1000 2004 2888
Pk Hr Factor 0.928 0.961 0.948 0.836 0.954 0.959
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4471 1388 5859 0 0 1772 3783 5555
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:15 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2676 808 3393 0 0 918 2004 2888
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.928 0.737 0.948 0.000 0.000 0.941 0.954 0.959
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total31,220
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Kelly Dr & Lisa St
Thursday
9/19/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total31,220
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_002
NB SB EB WB
0 0 18,438 16,433
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 5 30 35 265 282 547 00:15 10 23 33 277 252 52900:30 9 16 25 244 218 46200:45 5 29 8 77 13 106 272 1058 224 976 496 203401:00 3 8 11 251 245 49601:15 4 12 16 272 255 52701:30 5 7 12 306 247 55301:45 6 18 5 32 11 50 283 1112 242 989 525 210102:00 6 6 12 295 310 605 02:15 4 8 12 301 349 650 02:30 11 6 17 492 328 820 02:45 9 30 5 25 14 55 417 1505 379 1366 796 287103:00 9 7 16 266 387 653 03:15 19 3 22 360 335 695 03:30 16 4 20 318 392 710 03:45 31 75 2 16 33 91 290 1234 441 1555 731 278904:00 14 6 20 270 459 729 04:15 21 3 24 262 468 730 04:30 53 13 66 280 487 767 04:45 84 172 18 40 102 212 264 1076 513 1927 777 300305:00 58 8 66 237 447 684 05:15 98 20 118 228 496 724 05:30 166 22 188 234 519 753 05:45 186 508 32 82 218 590 219 918 402 1864 621 278206:00 144 47 191 192 370 562 06:15 185 49 234 192 384 576 06:30 312 79 391 193 327 520 06:45 422 1063 110 285 532 1348 183 760 312 1393 495 215307:00 438 276 714 178 232 410 07:15 588 180 768 130 202 332 07:30 625 174 799 126 166 292 07:45 624 2275 187 817 811 3092 115 549 147 747 262 129608:00 561 152 713 102 140 242 08:15 467 136 603 93 116 209 08:30 369 116 485 114 113 227 08:45 357 1754 162 566 519 2320 104 413 98 467 202 88009:00 268 144 412 125 105 230 09:15 257 175 432 117 126 243 09:30 248 154 402 208 121 329 09:45 255 1028 177 650 432 1678 170 620 85 437 255 105710:00 201 163 364 79 74 153 10:15 177 200 377 42 65 107 10:30 205 181 386 48 86 134 10:45 208 791 177 721 385 1512 45 214 71 296 116 51011:00 183 231 414 36 65 101 11:15 279 219 498 25 57 82 11:30 345 204 549 32 42 74 11:45 307 1114 263 917 570 2031 29 122 24 188 53 310
TOTALS 8857 4228 13085 9581 12205 21786
SPLIT %67.7%32.3%37.5%44.0%56.0%62.5%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 18,438 16,433
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:45 07:00 14:30 16:45 16:00
AM Pk Volume 2398 1015 3092 1535 1975 3003
Pk Hr Factor 0.959 0.900 0.953 0.780 0.951 0.966
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4029 1383 5412 0 0 1994 3791 5785
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:00 16:45 16:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2398 817 3092 0 0 1076 1975 3003
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.959 0.740 0.953 0.000 0.000 0.961 0.951 0.966
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total34,871
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Kelly Dr & Lisa St
Friday
9/20/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total34,871
Project #:CA19_4341_002 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/16/2019El Camino Real Bet. Kelly Dr & Lisa St
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_002 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/17/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Kelly Dr & Lisa St
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_002 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/18/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Kelly Dr & Lisa St
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_002 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/19/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Kelly Dr & Lisa St
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_002 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/20/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Kelly Dr & Lisa St
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_003
NB SB EB WB
0 0 15,714 15,136
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 16 17 33 188 245 433 00:15 11 15 26 201 228 42900:30 10 9 19 236 244 48000:45 6 43 8 49 14 92 265 890 186 903 451 179301:00 8 8 16 209 208 41701:15 3 7 10 203 233 43601:30 3 4 7 233 203 43601:45 4 18 6 25 10 43 191 836 206 850 397 168602:00 5 4 9 198 255 453 02:15 5 3 8 191 310 501 02:30 10 3 13 305 331 636 02:45 10 30 4 14 14 44 269 963 328 1224 597 218703:00 5 5 10 235 290 525 03:15 12 5 17 221 314 535 03:30 12 0 12 223 398 621 03:45 21 50 6 16 27 66 218 897 447 1449 665 234604:00 25 1 26 194 443 637 04:15 32 6 38 206 453 659 04:30 54 10 64 209 455 664 04:45 72 183 16 33 88 216 256 865 506 1857 762 272205:00 65 11 76 214 540 754 05:15 93 20 113 190 531 721 05:30 153 23 176 187 512 699 05:45 199 510 37 91 236 601 180 771 422 2005 602 277606:00 149 47 196 177 374 551 06:15 189 49 238 160 307 467 06:30 309 87 396 146 268 414 06:45 455 1102 114 297 569 1399 147 630 223 1172 370 180207:00 492 259 751 111 204 315 07:15 595 189 784 122 181 303 07:30 681 173 854 109 174 283 07:45 709 2477 166 787 875 3264 99 441 148 707 247 114808:00 568 147 715 83 90 173 08:15 489 127 616 80 115 195 08:30 409 118 527 60 92 152 08:45 359 1825 131 523 490 2348 65 288 99 396 164 68409:00 270 163 433 65 124 189 09:15 267 133 400 55 88 143 09:30 243 134 377 42 87 129 09:45 221 1001 167 597 388 1598 47 209 93 392 140 60110:00 191 145 336 33 84 117 10:15 190 137 327 29 54 83 10:30 188 166 354 22 68 90 10:45 198 767 175 623 373 1390 25 109 41 247 66 35611:00 192 160 352 12 42 54 11:15 171 215 386 13 27 40 11:30 192 190 382 15 22 37 11:45 202 757 199 764 401 1521 12 52 24 115 36 167
TOTALS 8763 3819 12582 6951 11317 18268
SPLIT %69.6%30.4%40.8%38.1%61.9%59.2%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 15,714 15,136
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:45 07:00 14:30 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 2553 916 3264 1030 2089 2936
Pk Hr Factor 0.900 0.935 0.933 0.844 0.967 0.963
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4302 1310 5612 0 0 1636 3862 5498
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:15 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2553 787 3264 0 0 885 2089 2936
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.900 0.760 0.933 0.000 0.000 0.864 0.967 0.963
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
9/16/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Monday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
El Camino Real Bet. Crestview Dr & Cannon Rd
21:3021:4522:00
Total30,850
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total30,850
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_003
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,294 15,549
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 10 18 28 184 222 406 00:15 6 15 21 210 223 43300:30 11 16 27 214 195 40900:45 2 29 17 66 19 95 216 824 193 833 409 165701:00 1 5 6 199 193 39201:15 2 7 9 240 245 48501:30 3 10 13 237 191 42801:45 9 15 6 28 15 43 211 887 223 852 434 173902:00 3 1 4 206 282 488 02:15 5 8 13 206 289 495 02:30 3 6 9 334 307 641 02:45 2 13 5 20 7 33 356 1102 360 1238 716 234003:00 6 3 9 202 323 525 03:15 6 3 9 210 289 499 03:30 15 1 16 209 417 626 03:45 19 46 5 12 24 58 222 843 491 1520 713 236304:00 15 7 22 240 430 670 04:15 28 5 33 196 473 669 04:30 62 11 73 224 527 751 04:45 77 182 14 37 91 219 213 873 588 2018 801 289105:00 61 11 72 202 514 716 05:15 87 14 101 221 545 766 05:30 165 18 183 189 463 652 05:45 191 504 31 74 222 578 185 797 517 2039 702 283606:00 158 44 202 186 483 669 06:15 203 57 260 181 355 536 06:30 325 69 394 154 252 406 06:45 492 1178 123 293 615 1471 120 641 211 1301 331 194207:00 485 265 750 141 188 329 07:15 667 167 834 133 173 306 07:30 715 161 876 101 164 265 07:45 725 2592 179 772 904 3364 153 528 174 699 327 122708:00 613 124 737 104 151 255 08:15 525 140 665 73 127 200 08:30 404 137 541 73 114 187 08:45 411 1953 120 521 531 2474 74 324 120 512 194 83609:00 282 134 416 80 101 181 09:15 242 154 396 87 91 178 09:30 230 132 362 51 79 130 09:45 239 993 139 559 378 1552 45 263 56 327 101 59010:00 206 144 350 26 69 95 10:15 200 177 377 37 42 79 10:30 174 171 345 24 68 92 10:45 181 761 143 635 324 1396 19 106 38 217 57 32311:00 195 193 388 18 48 66 11:15 167 196 363 13 32 45 11:30 208 219 427 9 24 33 11:45 214 784 234 842 448 1626 16 56 30 134 46 190
TOTALS 9050 3859 12909 7244 11690 18934
SPLIT %70.1%29.9%40.5%38.3%61.7%59.5%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,294 15,549
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:30 07:00 14:00 16:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 2720 898 3364 1102 2174 3034
Pk Hr Factor 0.938 0.959 0.930 0.774 0.924 0.947
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4545 1293 5838 0 0 1670 4057 5727
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:00 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2720 772 3364 0 0 873 2174 3034
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.938 0.728 0.930 0.000 0.000 0.909 0.924 0.947
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total31,843
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Crestview Dr & Cannon Rd
Tuesday
9/17/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total31,843
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_003
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,663 15,789
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 9 23 32 189 273 462 00:15 4 11 15 204 217 42100:30 10 9 19 214 241 45500:45 4 27 7 50 11 77 218 825 216 947 434 177201:00 9 14 23 212 203 41501:15 4 12 16 242 221 46301:30 4 7 11 207 218 42501:45 3 20 5 38 8 58 211 872 268 910 479 178202:00 5 8 13 200 298 498 02:15 4 2 6 222 315 537 02:30 2 4 6 330 332 662 02:45 5 16 2 16 7 32 339 1091 364 1309 703 240003:00 3 5 8 207 303 510 03:15 11 4 15 212 286 498 03:30 12 1 13 237 405 642 03:45 28 54 7 17 35 71 246 902 443 1437 689 233904:00 12 5 17 256 445 701 04:15 30 4 34 230 457 687 04:30 50 9 59 257 503 760 04:45 76 168 16 34 92 202 225 968 499 1904 724 287205:00 70 8 78 238 534 772 05:15 91 15 106 262 532 794 05:30 146 15 161 214 531 745 05:45 190 497 41 79 231 576 188 902 415 2012 603 291406:00 163 41 204 174 360 534 06:15 194 64 258 186 349 535 06:30 337 75 412 173 303 476 06:45 433 1127 142 322 575 1449 160 693 251 1263 411 195607:00 500 270 770 114 218 332 07:15 688 143 831 111 222 333 07:30 772 168 940 122 190 312 07:45 661 2621 173 754 834 3375 92 439 144 774 236 121308:00 641 137 778 91 153 244 08:15 522 145 667 97 134 231 08:30 489 177 666 78 129 207 08:45 434 2086 141 600 575 2686 86 352 125 541 211 89309:00 297 143 440 65 111 176 09:15 256 130 386 75 104 179 09:30 221 128 349 64 85 149 09:45 210 984 152 553 362 1537 41 245 80 380 121 62510:00 193 159 352 35 61 96 10:15 209 162 371 33 44 77 10:30 221 172 393 21 53 74 10:45 203 826 182 675 385 1501 16 105 43 201 59 30611:00 182 204 386 19 49 68 11:15 184 182 366 13 37 50 11:30 197 242 439 15 27 42 11:45 224 787 209 837 433 1624 9 56 23 136 32 192
TOTALS 9213 3975 13188 7450 11814 19264
SPLIT %69.9%30.1%40.6%38.7%61.3%59.4%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,663 15,789
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:30 07:15 14:15 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 2762 941 3383 1098 2096 3050
Pk Hr Factor 0.894 0.862 0.900 0.810 0.981 0.960
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4707 1354 6061 0 0 1870 3916 5786
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:15 16:30 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2762 754 3383 0 0 982 2096 3050
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.894 0.698 0.900 0.000 0.000 0.937 0.981 0.960
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total32,452
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Crestview Dr & Cannon Rd
Wednesday
9/18/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total32,452
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_003
NB SB EB WB
0 0 17,413 15,685
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 11 20 31 212 241 453 00:15 7 20 27 172 244 41600:30 12 14 26 264 201 46500:45 2 32 8 62 10 94 278 926 234 920 512 184601:00 3 2 5 236 261 49701:15 2 8 10 227 265 49201:30 7 7 14 313 250 56301:45 7 19 11 28 18 47 279 1055 210 986 489 204102:00 4 6 10 202 286 488 02:15 8 9 17 233 254 487 02:30 5 6 11 300 339 639 02:45 6 23 4 25 10 48 313 1048 310 1189 623 223703:00 8 2 10 228 325 553 03:15 15 0 15 223 334 557 03:30 15 2 17 248 448 696 03:45 30 68 7 11 37 79 239 938 428 1535 667 247304:00 16 8 24 238 467 705 04:15 28 5 33 237 503 740 04:30 50 9 59 247 459 706 04:45 70 164 18 40 88 204 246 968 515 1944 761 291205:00 69 8 77 240 508 748 05:15 108 17 125 214 504 718 05:30 165 22 187 263 518 781 05:45 212 554 24 71 236 625 206 923 488 2018 694 294106:00 156 57 213 186 358 544 06:15 235 54 289 164 295 459 06:30 347 49 396 131 296 427 06:45 505 1243 108 268 613 1511 123 604 222 1171 345 177507:00 569 270 839 134 239 373 07:15 674 168 842 116 203 319 07:30 779 166 945 129 175 304 07:45 688 2710 164 768 852 3478 98 477 157 774 255 125108:00 696 135 831 81 133 214 08:15 561 144 705 84 134 218 08:30 435 140 575 74 135 209 08:45 434 2126 157 576 591 2702 73 312 121 523 194 83509:00 303 132 435 76 103 179 09:15 270 138 408 80 97 177 09:30 274 152 426 64 66 130 09:45 261 1108 134 556 395 1664 59 279 62 328 121 60710:00 193 138 331 40 69 109 10:15 216 152 368 37 74 111 10:30 180 163 343 24 70 94 10:45 244 833 177 630 421 1463 22 123 40 253 62 37611:00 178 206 384 13 57 70 11:15 210 215 425 20 40 60 11:30 212 221 433 18 27 45 11:45 220 820 229 871 449 1691 9 60 14 138 23 198
TOTALS 9700 3906 13606 7713 11779 19492
SPLIT %71.3%28.7%41.1%39.6%60.4%58.9%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 17,413 15,685
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:30 07:00 14:15 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 2837 935 3478 1074 2045 3008
Pk Hr Factor 0.910 0.958 0.920 0.858 0.987 0.963
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4836 1344 6180 0 0 1891 3962 5853
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:15 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2837 768 3478 0 0 970 2045 3008
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.910 0.711 0.920 0.000 0.000 0.982 0.987 0.963
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total33,098
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Crestview Dr & Cannon Rd
Thursday
9/19/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total33,098
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4341_003
NB SB EB WB
0 0 19,377 16,910
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 6 34 40 282 294 576 00:15 10 21 31 288 263 55100:30 13 18 31 265 218 48300:45 3 32 11 84 14 116 299 1134 229 1004 528 213801:00 4 7 11 277 265 54201:15 5 13 18 295 250 54501:30 6 8 14 321 259 58001:45 3 18 5 33 8 51 320 1213 258 1032 578 224502:00 6 8 14 327 329 656 02:15 4 5 9 347 335 682 02:30 9 7 16 504 344 848 02:45 10 29 4 24 14 53 456 1634 401 1409 857 304303:00 10 7 17 267 388 655 03:15 20 3 23 352 379 731 03:30 19 5 24 334 418 752 03:45 30 79 1 16 31 95 307 1260 464 1649 771 290904:00 17 5 22 283 472 755 04:15 22 3 25 279 482 761 04:30 55 15 70 293 524 817 04:45 90 184 16 39 106 223 250 1105 516 1994 766 309905:00 60 8 68 271 484 755 05:15 101 16 117 245 518 763 05:30 175 23 198 226 514 740 05:45 193 529 25 72 218 601 229 971 415 1931 644 290206:00 151 46 197 210 347 557 06:15 207 49 256 209 424 633 06:30 328 76 404 221 299 520 06:45 448 1134 115 286 563 1420 185 825 327 1397 512 222207:00 466 262 728 180 245 425 07:15 581 167 748 133 214 347 07:30 644 171 815 138 180 318 07:45 655 2346 174 774 829 3120 120 571 153 792 273 136308:00 565 139 704 100 171 271 08:15 473 138 611 94 121 215 08:30 397 130 527 119 122 241 08:45 371 1806 156 563 527 2369 102 415 102 516 204 93109:00 276 156 432 130 115 245 09:15 271 151 422 127 147 274 09:30 269 164 433 202 130 332 09:45 269 1085 171 642 440 1727 185 644 79 471 264 111510:00 205 162 367 82 84 166 10:15 183 198 381 53 74 127 10:30 224 212 436 53 83 136 10:45 226 838 165 737 391 1575 44 232 75 316 119 54811:00 217 248 465 38 65 103 11:15 288 221 509 25 62 87 11:30 349 187 536 34 47 81 11:45 311 1165 273 929 584 2094 31 128 26 200 57 328
TOTALS 9245 4199 13444 10132 12711 22843
SPLIT %68.8%31.2%37.0%44.4%55.6%63.0%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 19,377 16,910
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:45 07:00 14:00 16:30 15:45
AM Pk Volume 2445 1048 3120 1634 2042 3104
Pk Hr Factor 0.933 0.891 0.941 0.811 0.974 0.950
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4152 1337 5489 0 0 2076 3925 6001
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:00 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2445 774 3120 0 0 1105 2042 3101
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.933 0.739 0.941 0.000 0.000 0.943 0.974 0.949
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total36,287
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Crestview Dr & Cannon Rd
Friday
9/20/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total36,287
Project #:CA19_4341_003 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/16/2019El Camino Real Bet. Crestview Dr & Cannon
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_003 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/17/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Crestview Dr & Cannon
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_003 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/18/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Crestview Dr & Cannon
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_003 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/19/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Crestview Dr & Cannon
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4341_003 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/20/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Crestview Dr & Cannon
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 5
Location: El Camino Real
Between Cannon Road and College Boulevard
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_003
NB SB EB WB
23,944 22,183 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 31 10 0 0 41 443 238 0 0 681 00:15 22 7 0 0 29 367 279 0 0 64600:30 17 13 0 0 30 330 272 0 0 60200:45 10 80 5 35 0 0 15 115 328 1468 303 1092 0 0 631 256001:00 15 10 0 0 25 361 294 0 0 65501:15 12 9 0 0 21 300 393 0 0 69301:30 20 6 0 0 26 357 423 0 0 78001:45 13 60 7 32 0 0 20 92 356 1374 332 1442 0 0 688 281602:00 10 6 0 0 16 443 266 0 0 709 02:15 5 8 0 0 13 452 336 0 0 788 02:30 10 10 0 0 20 594 388 0 0 982 02:45 10 35 12 36 0 0 22 71 578 2067 545 1535 0 0 1123 360203:00 6 6 0 0 12 560 365 0 0 925 03:15 2 9 0 0 11 576 350 0 0 926 03:30 14 23 0 0 37 688 331 0 0 1019 03:45 9 31 39 77 0 0 48 108 681 2505 354 1400 0 0 1035 390504:00 15 35 0 0 50 795 298 0 0 1093 04:15 12 50 0 0 62 728 321 0 0 1049 04:30 12 89 0 0 101 854 279 0 0 1133 04:45 30 69 120 294 0 0 150 363 810 3187 361 1259 0 0 1171 444605:00 17 90 0 0 107 799 314 0 0 1113 05:15 24 108 0 0 132 766 301 0 0 1067 05:30 27 220 0 0 247 752 280 0 0 1032 05:45 50 118 354 772 0 0 404 890 637 2954 256 1151 0 0 893 410506:00 68 199 0 0 267 553 233 0 0 786 06:15 64 324 0 0 388 461 245 0 0 706 06:30 105 415 0 0 520 380 217 0 0 597 06:45 230 467 604 1542 0 0 834 2009 354 1748 184 879 0 0 538 262707:00 401 673 0 0 1074 311 135 0 0 446 07:15 309 706 0 0 1015 287 123 0 0 410 07:30 195 810 0 0 1005 243 122 0 0 365 07:45 208 1113 831 3020 0 0 1039 4133 240 1081 121 501 0 0 361 158208:00 191 771 0 0 962 163 98 0 0 261 08:15 216 656 0 0 872 190 139 0 0 329 08:30 234 545 0 0 779 192 117 0 0 309 08:45 216 857 567 2539 0 0 783 3396 150 695 94 448 0 0 244 114309:00 216 413 0 0 629 124 83 0 0 207 09:15 184 420 0 0 604 99 89 0 0 188 09:30 227 351 0 0 578 107 76 0 0 183 09:45 220 847 344 1528 0 0 564 2375 91 421 66 314 0 0 157 73510:00 230 257 0 0 487 76 46 0 0 122 10:15 254 292 0 0 546 73 30 0 0 103 10:30 260 267 0 0 527 98 26 0 0 124 10:45 253 997 239 1055 0 0 492 2052 62 309 30 132 0 0 92 44111:00 290 224 0 0 514 84 24 0 0 108 11:15 311 239 0 0 550 50 22 0 0 72 11:30 283 270 0 0 553 50 25 0 0 75 11:45 344 1228 271 1004 0 0 615 2232 49 233 25 96 0 0 74 329
TOTALS 5902 11934 17836 18042 10249 28291
SPLIT %33.1%66.9%38.7%63.8%36.2%61.3%
NB SB EB WB
23,944 22,183 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:15 07:00 16:30 14:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1484 3118 4133 3229 1648 4484
Pk Hr Factor 0.837 0.938 0.962 0.945 0.756 0.957
7 - 9 Volume 1970 5559 0 0 7529 6141 2410 0 0 8551
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:15 07:00 16:30 16:15 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1113 3118 0 0 4133 3229 1275 0 0 4484
Pk Hr Factor 0.694 0.938 0.000 0.000 0.962 0.945 0.883 0.000 0.000 0.957
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total46,127
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
El Camino Real Bet. Jackspar Dr & College Blvd
21:3021:4522:00
Total46,127
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_003
NB SB EB WB
24,088 21,410 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 33 12 0 0 45 395 281 0 0 676 00:15 14 14 0 0 28 303 267 0 0 57000:30 22 10 0 0 32 320 333 0 0 65300:45 19 88 7 43 0 0 26 131 278 1296 308 1189 0 0 586 248501:00 10 10 0 0 20 398 306 0 0 70401:15 9 5 0 0 14 323 277 0 0 60001:30 12 7 0 0 19 371 352 0 0 72301:45 14 45 4 26 0 0 18 71 384 1476 342 1277 0 0 726 275302:00 9 5 0 0 14 446 285 0 0 731 02:15 15 8 0 0 23 415 302 0 0 717 02:30 8 10 0 0 18 695 364 0 0 1059 02:45 8 40 11 34 0 0 19 74 606 2162 455 1406 0 0 1061 356803:00 4 7 0 0 11 510 319 0 0 829 03:15 6 8 0 0 14 577 331 0 0 908 03:30 13 26 0 0 39 670 297 0 0 967 03:45 10 33 50 91 0 0 60 124 692 2449 298 1245 0 0 990 369404:00 9 32 0 0 41 774 301 0 0 1075 04:15 12 61 0 0 73 687 257 0 0 944 04:30 19 77 0 0 96 854 258 0 0 1112 04:45 21 61 133 303 0 0 154 364 754 3069 286 1102 0 0 1040 417105:00 23 91 0 0 114 854 277 0 0 1131 05:15 29 131 0 0 160 741 258 0 0 999 05:30 28 245 0 0 273 675 279 0 0 954 05:45 54 134 379 846 0 0 433 980 649 2919 222 1036 0 0 871 395506:00 64 219 0 0 283 546 241 0 0 787 06:15 83 292 0 0 375 461 222 0 0 683 06:30 119 397 0 0 516 441 167 0 0 608 06:45 176 442 607 1515 0 0 783 1957 311 1759 191 821 0 0 502 258007:00 275 576 0 0 851 294 144 0 0 438 07:15 189 775 0 0 964 283 117 0 0 400 07:30 225 789 0 0 1014 244 104 0 0 348 07:45 286 975 821 2961 0 0 1107 3936 209 1030 125 490 0 0 334 152008:00 376 689 0 0 1065 212 99 0 0 311 08:15 230 629 0 0 859 204 130 0 0 334 08:30 211 592 0 0 803 175 136 0 0 311 08:45 257 1074 553 2463 0 0 810 3537 158 749 89 454 0 0 247 120309:00 189 395 0 0 584 200 112 0 0 312 09:15 237 376 0 0 613 158 78 0 0 236 09:30 235 328 0 0 563 96 65 0 0 161 09:45 227 888 362 1461 0 0 589 2349 96 550 75 330 0 0 171 88010:00 223 288 0 0 511 95 36 0 0 131 10:15 235 281 0 0 516 74 33 0 0 107 10:30 262 258 0 0 520 90 35 0 0 125 10:45 269 989 285 1112 0 0 554 2101 68 327 31 135 0 0 99 46211:00 282 242 0 0 524 66 20 0 0 86 11:15 303 226 0 0 529 44 17 0 0 61 11:30 371 245 0 0 616 49 15 0 0 64 11:45 364 1320 289 1002 0 0 653 2322 54 213 16 68 0 0 70 281
TOTALS 6089 11857 17946 17999 9553 27552
SPLIT %33.9%66.1%39.4%65.3%34.7%60.6%
NB SB EB WB
24,088 21,410 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:15 07:15 07:15 16:30 14:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1433 3074 4150 3203 1469 4282
Pk Hr Factor 0.907 0.936 0.937 0.938 0.807 0.947
7 - 9 Volume 2049 5424 0 0 7473 5988 2138 0 0 8126
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:15 16:30 16:00 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1117 3074 0 0 4150 3203 1102 0 0 4282
Pk Hr Factor 0.743 0.936 0.000 0.000 0.937 0.938 0.915 0.000 0.000 0.947
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Jackspar Dr & College Blvd
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total45,498
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total45,498
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_003 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019El Camino Real Bet. Jackspar Dr & College
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_003 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Jackspar Dr & College
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 6
Location: El Camino Real
Between College Boulevard and Palomar Airport Road
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_004
NB SB EB WB
18,317 19,801 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 19 9 0 0 28 330 454 0 0 784 00:15 12 7 0 0 19 341 362 0 0 70300:30 7 10 0 0 17 320 337 0 0 65700:45 5 43 5 31 0 0 10 74 366 1357 347 1500 0 0 713 285701:00 8 9 0 0 17 369 378 0 0 74701:15 10 6 0 0 16 395 353 0 0 74801:30 11 8 0 0 19 342 378 0 0 72001:45 5 34 5 28 0 0 10 62 320 1426 317 1426 0 0 637 285202:00 6 6 0 0 12 306 355 0 0 661 02:15 4 7 0 0 11 331 336 0 0 667 02:30 6 6 0 0 12 362 373 0 0 735 02:45 5 21 5 24 0 0 10 45 387 1386 449 1513 0 0 836 289903:00 5 4 0 0 9 362 393 0 0 755 03:15 3 8 0 0 11 373 305 0 0 678 03:30 8 17 0 0 25 385 402 0 0 787 03:45 14 30 19 48 0 0 33 78 395 1515 425 1525 0 0 820 304004:00 13 20 0 0 33 447 367 0 0 814 04:15 10 32 0 0 42 400 384 0 0 784 04:30 18 49 0 0 67 472 369 0 0 841 04:45 41 82 66 167 0 0 107 249 452 1771 387 1507 0 0 839 327805:00 38 41 0 0 79 466 467 0 0 933 05:15 46 53 0 0 99 423 408 0 0 831 05:30 64 106 0 0 170 425 364 0 0 789 05:45 123 271 163 363 0 0 286 634 380 1694 320 1559 0 0 700 325306:00 89 139 0 0 228 369 297 0 0 666 06:15 116 166 0 0 282 236 241 0 0 477 06:30 120 225 0 0 345 249 211 0 0 460 06:45 255 580 393 923 0 0 648 1503 210 1064 193 942 0 0 403 200607:00 320 469 0 0 789 202 147 0 0 349 07:15 256 516 0 0 772 196 91 0 0 287 07:30 264 474 0 0 738 163 90 0 0 253 07:45 340 1180 398 1857 0 0 738 3037 151 712 107 435 0 0 258 114708:00 285 463 0 0 748 130 77 0 0 207 08:15 313 429 0 0 742 136 79 0 0 215 08:30 293 446 0 0 739 100 83 0 0 183 08:45 296 1187 377 1715 0 0 673 2902 98 464 72 311 0 0 170 77509:00 254 302 0 0 556 97 67 0 0 164 09:15 240 329 0 0 569 63 69 0 0 132 09:30 211 302 0 0 513 79 71 0 0 150 09:45 220 925 254 1187 0 0 474 2112 67 306 35 242 0 0 102 54810:00 224 304 0 0 528 51 39 0 0 90 10:15 238 204 0 0 442 46 27 0 0 73 10:30 211 260 0 0 471 45 25 0 0 70 10:45 180 853 253 1021 0 0 433 1874 51 193 30 121 0 0 81 31411:00 277 256 0 0 533 43 28 0 0 71 11:15 230 269 0 0 499 29 23 0 0 52 11:30 247 358 0 0 605 39 22 0 0 61 11:45 335 1089 378 1261 0 0 713 2350 23 134 22 95 0 0 45 229
TOTALS 6295 8625 14920 12022 11176 23198
SPLIT %42.2%57.8%39.1%51.8%48.2%60.9%
NB SB EB WB
18,317 19,801 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:00 07:00 16:30 16:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1326 1857 3037 1813 1631 3444
Pk Hr Factor 0.972 0.900 0.962 0.960 0.873 0.923
7 - 9 Volume 2367 3572 0 0 5939 3465 3066 0 0 6531
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:00 16:30 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1231 1857 0 0 3037 1813 1631 0 0 3444
Pk Hr Factor 0.905 0.900 0.000 0.000 0.962 0.960 0.873 0.000 0.000 0.923
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total38,118
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
El Camino Real Bet. College Blvd & Palomar Airport Rd
21:3021:4522:00
Total38,118
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_004
NB SB EB WB
17,321 17,843 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 21 11 0 0 32 313 336 0 0 649 00:15 10 14 0 0 24 273 308 0 0 58100:30 16 13 0 0 29 308 344 0 0 65200:45 10 57 5 43 0 0 15 100 348 1242 268 1256 0 0 616 249801:00 6 10 0 0 16 355 275 0 0 63001:15 6 2 0 0 8 322 272 0 0 59401:30 10 5 0 0 15 293 277 0 0 57001:45 8 30 1 18 0 0 9 48 298 1268 341 1165 0 0 639 243302:00 5 6 0 0 11 284 298 0 0 582 02:15 7 3 0 0 10 310 259 0 0 569 02:30 5 6 0 0 11 350 308 0 0 658 02:45 3 20 5 20 0 0 8 40 348 1292 394 1259 0 0 742 255103:00 4 3 0 0 7 326 315 0 0 641 03:15 9 3 0 0 12 322 283 0 0 605 03:30 8 25 0 0 33 351 317 0 0 668 03:45 18 39 22 53 0 0 40 92 350 1349 345 1260 0 0 695 260904:00 7 23 0 0 30 409 358 0 0 767 04:15 17 32 0 0 49 417 307 0 0 724 04:30 23 48 0 0 71 408 312 0 0 720 04:45 40 87 66 169 0 0 106 256 383 1617 347 1324 0 0 730 294105:00 35 50 0 0 85 439 341 0 0 780 05:15 46 60 0 0 106 361 338 0 0 699 05:30 78 119 0 0 197 331 345 0 0 676 05:45 128 287 169 398 0 0 297 685 344 1475 286 1310 0 0 630 278506:00 76 141 0 0 217 302 254 0 0 556 06:15 113 204 0 0 317 260 244 0 0 504 06:30 123 253 0 0 376 251 177 0 0 428 06:45 218 530 317 915 0 0 535 1445 216 1029 195 870 0 0 411 189907:00 261 440 0 0 701 163 147 0 0 310 07:15 239 444 0 0 683 177 101 0 0 278 07:30 264 432 0 0 696 179 104 0 0 283 07:45 369 1133 443 1759 0 0 812 2892 147 666 104 456 0 0 251 112208:00 350 418 0 0 768 140 84 0 0 224 08:15 306 347 0 0 653 127 88 0 0 215 08:30 290 327 0 0 617 112 114 0 0 226 08:45 283 1229 396 1488 0 0 679 2717 112 491 71 357 0 0 183 84809:00 248 273 0 0 521 126 97 0 0 223 09:15 235 250 0 0 485 113 59 0 0 172 09:30 216 289 0 0 505 59 42 0 0 101 09:45 216 915 244 1056 0 0 460 1971 55 353 53 251 0 0 108 60410:00 220 244 0 0 464 60 36 0 0 96 10:15 216 260 0 0 476 62 35 0 0 97 10:30 212 269 0 0 481 43 34 0 0 77 10:45 227 875 278 1051 0 0 505 1926 43 208 32 137 0 0 75 34511:00 220 273 0 0 493 40 22 0 0 62 11:15 237 270 0 0 507 25 16 0 0 41 11:30 252 291 0 0 543 28 12 0 0 40 11:45 299 1008 333 1167 0 0 632 2175 28 121 11 61 0 0 39 182
TOTALS 6210 8137 14347 11111 9706 20817
SPLIT %43.3%56.7%40.8%53.4%46.6%59.2%
NB SB EB WB
17,321 17,843 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:15 16:15 16:45 16:15
AM Pk Volume 1315 1759 2959 1647 1371 2954
Pk Hr Factor 0.891 0.990 0.911 0.938 0.988 0.947
7 - 9 Volume 2362 3247 0 0 5609 3092 2634 0 0 5726
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:15 16:15 16:45 16:15
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1315 1759 0 0 2959 1647 1371 0 0 2954
Pk Hr Factor 0.891 0.990 0.000 0.000 0.911 0.938 0.988 0.000 0.000 0.947
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. College Blvd & Palomar Airport Rd
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total35,164
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total35,164
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_004 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019El Camino Real Bet. College Blvd & Palomar
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_004 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. College Blvd & Palomar
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 7
Location: El Camino Real
Between Palomar Airport Road and Camino Vida Roble
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_005
NB SB EB WB
18,710 17,271 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 25 9 34 302 264 566 00:15 13 7 20 272 239 51100:30 20 6 26 295 275 57000:45 9 67 8 30 17 97 278 1147 267 1045 545 219201:00 11 18 29 335 219 55401:15 21 5 26 365 240 60501:30 14 4 18 315 271 58601:45 4 50 5 32 9 82 305 1320 305 1035 610 235502:00 5 2 7 290 249 539 02:15 14 5 19 334 245 579 02:30 6 5 11 358 285 643 02:45 5 30 6 18 11 48 353 1335 326 1105 679 244003:00 6 3 9 342 325 667 03:15 3 7 10 319 304 623 03:30 14 15 29 355 283 638 03:45 22 45 18 43 40 88 340 1356 312 1224 652 258004:00 12 10 22 364 280 644 04:15 9 10 19 361 309 670 04:30 14 43 57 421 333 754 04:45 34 69 55 118 89 187 380 1526 324 1246 704 277205:00 35 44 79 386 342 728 05:15 37 61 98 411 386 797 05:30 48 90 138 381 308 689 05:45 88 208 150 345 238 553 353 1531 279 1315 632 284606:00 80 135 215 339 276 615 06:15 115 207 322 343 276 619 06:30 169 255 424 259 210 469 06:45 221 585 292 889 513 1474 243 1184 220 982 463 216607:00 273 430 703 249 153 402 07:15 250 434 684 187 129 316 07:30 294 461 755 179 122 301 07:45 379 1196 358 1683 737 2879 163 778 123 527 286 130508:00 389 405 794 162 93 255 08:15 398 371 769 127 108 235 08:30 262 369 631 119 82 201 08:45 433 1482 406 1551 839 3033 134 542 94 377 228 91909:00 294 290 584 164 98 262 09:15 350 281 631 128 83 211 09:30 278 309 587 91 65 156 09:45 222 1144 265 1145 487 2289 99 482 61 307 160 78910:00 287 224 511 75 39 114 10:15 259 232 491 73 51 124 10:30 291 242 533 92 35 127 10:45 263 1100 242 940 505 2040 74 314 26 151 100 46511:00 238 249 487 47 30 77 11:15 286 265 551 25 16 41 11:30 285 282 567 24 16 40 11:45 290 1099 294 1090 584 2189 24 120 11 73 35 193
TOTALS 7075 7884 14959 11635 9387 21022
SPLIT %47.3%52.7%41.6%55.3%44.7%58.4%
NB SB EB WB
18,710 17,271 0 0
AM Peak Hour 08:00 07:00 07:30 16:30 16:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1482 1683 3055 1598 1385 2983
Pk Hr Factor 0.856 0.913 0.962 0.949 0.897 0.936
7 - 9 Volume 2678 3234 0 0 5912 3057 2561 0 0 5618
7 - 9 Peak Hour 08:00 07:00 07:30 16:30 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1482 1683 0 0 3055 1598 1385 0 0 2983
Pk Hr Factor 0.856 0.913 0.000 0.000 0.962 0.949 0.897 0.000 0.000 0.936
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/1/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
El Camino Real Bet. Palomar Airport Rd & Camino Vida Roble
21:3021:4522:00
Total35,981
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total35,981
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_005
NB SB EB WB
19,181 17,809 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 27 16 43 281 316 597 00:15 25 9 34 299 320 61900:30 17 10 27 298 293 59100:45 10 79 9 44 19 123 308 1186 269 1198 577 238401:00 13 11 24 358 280 63801:15 21 6 27 313 276 58901:30 7 5 12 294 309 60301:45 11 52 7 29 18 81 327 1292 297 1162 624 245402:00 6 2 8 286 248 534 02:15 5 3 8 302 267 569 02:30 4 4 8 339 266 605 02:45 7 22 7 16 14 38 330 1257 348 1129 678 238603:00 8 5 13 334 305 639 03:15 5 7 12 337 272 609 03:30 11 13 24 372 288 660 03:45 22 46 18 43 40 89 332 1375 303 1168 635 254304:00 10 15 25 403 302 705 04:15 9 17 26 390 305 695 04:30 11 30 41 395 316 711 04:45 39 69 55 117 94 186 351 1539 317 1240 668 277905:00 32 38 70 378 367 745 05:15 46 67 113 394 335 729 05:30 43 99 142 370 322 692 05:45 93 214 134 338 227 552 370 1512 287 1311 657 282306:00 103 145 248 335 263 598 06:15 146 175 321 322 260 582 06:30 150 275 425 272 224 496 06:45 327 726 326 921 653 1647 226 1155 194 941 420 209607:00 286 379 665 265 163 428 07:15 259 478 737 186 157 343 07:30 335 464 799 201 123 324 07:45 379 1259 394 1715 773 2974 211 863 127 570 338 143308:00 374 378 752 136 105 241 08:15 393 416 809 152 98 250 08:30 388 402 790 125 85 210 08:45 349 1504 384 1580 733 3084 123 536 86 374 209 91009:00 308 299 607 138 92 230 09:15 321 279 600 130 86 216 09:30 251 292 543 102 72 174 09:45 291 1171 291 1161 582 2332 139 509 68 318 207 82710:00 246 270 516 111 60 171 10:15 225 261 486 79 52 131 10:30 302 239 541 83 42 125 10:45 244 1017 272 1042 516 2059 79 352 33 187 112 53911:00 294 217 511 51 28 79 11:15 294 308 602 32 24 56 11:30 344 291 635 29 17 46 11:45 375 1307 302 1118 677 2425 27 139 18 87 45 226
TOTALS 7466 8124 15590 11715 9685 21400
SPLIT %47.9%52.1%42.1%54.7%45.3%57.9%
NB SB EB WB
19,181 17,809 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:00 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1534 1715 3133 1539 1341 2853
Pk Hr Factor 0.976 0.897 0.968 0.955 0.913 0.957
7 - 9 Volume 2763 3295 0 0 6058 3051 2551 0 0 5602
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:00 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1534 1715 0 0 3133 1539 1341 0 0 2853
Pk Hr Factor 0.976 0.897 0.000 0.000 0.968 0.955 0.913 0.000 0.000 0.957
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total36,990
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Palomar Airport Rd & Camino Vida Roble
Thursday
5/2/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total36,990
Project #:CA19_4201_005 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/1/2019El Camino Real Bet. Palomar Airport Rd &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_005 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/2/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Palomar Airport Rd &
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
8
El Camino Real
Between Camino Vida Roble and Poinsettia Lane
15 Minute Volume Report
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUM E
El Camino Real Bet. Cassia Rd & Poinsettia Ln
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4193_004
: DAILY TOTALS ~
, AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 19 12 31 12:00 233 239 472
00:15 6 14 20 12:15 220 251 471
00:30 8 10 18 12:30 255 297 552
00:45 4 37 8 44 12 81 12:45 297 1005 257 1044 554 2049
01:00 8 6 14 13:00 258 258 516
01:15 8 2 10 13:15 259 204 463
01:30 4 4 8 13:30 242 253 495
01:45 3 23 0 12 3 35 13:45 258 1017 218 933 476 1950
02:00 6 4 10 14:00 271 293 564
02:15 4 6 10 14:15 173 264 437
02:30 1 1 2 14:30 175 283 458
02:45 2 13 4 15 6 28 14:45 351 970 336 1176 687 2146
03:00 5 4 9 15:00 317 294 611
03:15 4 5 9 15:15 339 284 623
03:30 15 6 21 15:30 342 323 665
03:45 8 32 9 24 17 56 15:45 348 1346 302 1203 650 2549
04:00 12 11 23 16:00 346 381 727
04:15 15 13 28 16:15 365 410 775
04:30 20 17 37 16:30 347 409 756
04:45 40 87 40 81 80 168 16:45 318 1376 423 1623 741 2999
05:00 41 29 70 17:00 306 496 802
05:15 51 33 84 17:15 327 458 785
05:30 63 45 108 17:30 275 451 726
05:45 99 254 74 181 173 435 17:45 256 1164 427 1832 683 2996
06:00 114 77 191 18:00 255 300 555
06:15 124 113 237 18:15 252 311 563
06:30 189 151 340 18:30 209 294 503
06:45 214 641 251 592 465 1233 18:45 186 902 227 1132 413 2034
07:00 241 324 565 19:00 171 195 366
07:15 278 315 593 19:1S 173 162 335
07:30 309 447 756 19:30 147 141 288
07:45 439 1267 364 1450 803 2717 19:45 108 599 126 624 234 1223
08:00 433 367 800 20:00 121 116 237
08:15 396 332 728 20:15 98 117 215
08:30 352 295 647 20:30 110 111 221
08:4S 380 1561 284 1278 664 2839 20:45 88 417 105 449 193 866
09:00 298 292 590 21:00 82 75 157
09:15 290 244 534 21:15 73 77 150
09:30 290 208 498 21:30 76 65 141
09:45 246 1124 249 993 495 2117 21:45 60 291 59 276 119 567
10:00 238 227 465 22:00 62 43 105
10:15 194 202 396 22:15 45 32 77
10:30 194 224 418 22:30 52 47 99
10:45 236 862 206 859 442 1721 22:45 29 188 30 152 59 340
11:00 211 251 462 23:00 41 28 69
11:15 218 230 448 23:15 39 17 56
11:30 251 211 462 23:30 21 29 50
11:45 251 931 248 940 499 1871 23:45 20 121 21 95 41 216
TOTALS 6832 6469 13301 TOTALS 9396 10539 19935
SPLIT¾ 51.4% 48.6% 40.0% SPLIT¾ 47.1% 52.9% 60.0¾
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07;30 07:30 PM Peak Hour 15:45 17:00 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1620 1510 3087 PM Pk Volume 1406 1832 3084
Pk Hr Fa.ctor 0.923 0.845 0.961 Pk Hr Factor 0.963 0,923 0,961
7-9Volume 2828 2728 II 5556 4-6 Volume 2540 3455 5995
7 -9 Peak Hou~ 07:45 07:30 07:30 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:00 17:00 16:30
7 -9 Pk Volume 1620 1510 3087 4 -6 Pk Volume 1376 1832 3084
Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0.845 "' -~ 0.961 Pk Hr Factor 0.942 0.923 il ,t::l l •• 0.961
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
9
El Camino Real
Between Poinsettia Lane and Aviara Parkway-Alga Road
15 Minute Volume Report
Day: Tuesday
Date: 5/22/2018
Prepared by NOS/ATO
VOLUME
El Camlno Real Bet. Poinsettia Ln & Aviara Pkwy
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4193_005
I DAILY TOTALS ~
j AM Period . NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 21 15 36 12:00 265 259 524
00:15 8 11 19 12:15 249 305 554
00:30 7 10 17 12:30 296 339 635
00:45 6 42 7 43 13 85 12:45 348 1158 280 1183 628 2341
01:00 13 5 18 13:00 301 265 566
01:15 10 3 13 13:15 312 257 569
01:30 6 5 11 13:30 288 278 566
01:45 5 34 1 14 6 48 13:45 336 1237 248 1048 584 2285
02:00 7 3 10 14:00 353 341 694
02:15 4 7 11 14:15 355 293 648
02:30 1 1 2 14:30 370 307 677
02:45 3 15 5 16 8 31 14:45 404 1482 374 1315 778 2797
03:00 3 4 7 15:00 375 350 725
03:15 6 7 13 15:15 372 341 713
03:30 15 10 25 15:30 414 382 796
03:45 8 32 12 33 20 65 15:45 402 1563 340 1413 742 2976
04:00 13 17 30 16:00 386 406 792
04:15 16 17 33 16:15 459 418 877
04:30 20 22 42 16:30 420 441 861
04:45 39 88 56 112 95 200 16:45 396 1661 458 1723 854 3384
05:00 41 40 81 17:00 434 494 928
05:15 49 49 98 17:15 361 453 814
05:30 75 65 140 17:30 385 515 900
05:45 90 255 111 265 201 520 17:45 352 1532 415 1877 767 3409
06:00 118 112 230 18:00 314 353 667
06:15 134 174 308 18:15 331 310 641
06:30 207 216 423 18:30 294 289 583
06:45 220 679 342 844 562 1523 18:45 242 1181 242 1194 484 2375
07:00 266 401 667 19:00 214 222 436
07:15 311 438 749 19:15 199 183 382
07:30 416 523 939 19:30 175 166 341
07:45 509 1502 440 1802 949 3304 19:45 141 729 158 729 299 1458
08:00 458 407 865 20:00 160 112 272
08:15 399 427 826 20:15 133 118 251
08:30 385 364 749 20:30 135 115 250
08:45 390 1632 364 1562 754 3194 20:45 119 547 110 455 229 1002
09:00 331 286 617 21:00 119 79 198
09:15 300 297 597 21:15 95 85 180
09:30 296 275 571 21:30 87 61 148
09:45 278 1205 276 1134 554 2339 21:45 76 377 61 286 137 663
10:00 237 267 504 22:00 72 41 113
10:15 206 264 470 22:15 61 38 99
10:30 236 257 493 22:30 52 47 99
10:45 243 922 235 1023 478 1945 22:45 35 220 37 163 72 383
11:00 247 270 517 23:00 51 29 80
11:15 239 254 493 23:15 44 20 64
11:30 272 257 529 23:30 26 28 54
11:45 261 1019 283 1064 544 2083 23:45 22 143 17 94 39 237
TOTALS 7425 7912 15337 TOTALS 11830 11480 23310
SPLIT Y. 48.4% 51.6% 39.7% SPLIT¾ 50.8% 49.2% 60.3%
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Peak Hour 07'30 07:15 07:30 PM Peak Hour 16:15 16:45 16:15
AM Pk Volume 1782 1808 3579 PM Pk Volume 1709 1920 3520
Pk Hr Factor 0,875 0,864 0.943 Pk Hr Factor 0.931 0.932 0.948
7 -9Volume 3134 3364 6498 4 -6Volume 3193 3600 6793
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:15 16:45 16:15
7 -9 Pk Volume 1782 1808 3579 4 -6 Pk Volume 1709 1920 3520
Pk Hr Factor 0.875 0.864 L < < 0.943 Pk Hr Factor 0,931 0.932 -o,-; ,, _ _j 0.948
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 10
Location: El Camino Real
Between Aviara Parkway-Alga Road and La Costa Avenue
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_006
NB SB EB WB
25,343 27,208 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 26 9 35 371 420 791 00:15 20 9 29 385 407 79200:30 24 4 28 415 429 84400:45 13 83 5 27 18 110 364 1535 395 1651 759 318601:00 12 24 36 414 418 83201:15 11 12 23 459 401 86001:30 7 5 12 410 394 80401:45 10 40 8 49 18 89 409 1692 386 1599 795 329102:00 6 4 10 414 376 790 02:15 5 5 10 389 463 852 02:30 4 3 7 465 428 893 02:45 11 26 6 18 17 44 518 1786 434 1701 952 348703:00 4 8 12 475 473 948 03:15 7 4 11 528 496 1024 03:30 12 10 22 490 456 946 03:45 21 44 35 57 56 101 521 2014 500 1925 1021 393904:00 13 14 27 528 458 986 04:15 10 26 36 545 502 1047 04:30 18 53 71 589 485 1074 04:45 44 85 70 163 114 248 551 2213 568 2013 1119 422605:00 43 77 120 512 549 1061 05:15 38 90 128 619 641 1260 05:30 73 112 185 579 615 1194 05:45 107 261 148 427 255 688 528 2238 511 2316 1039 455406:00 111 232 343 521 449 970 06:15 139 295 434 492 416 908 06:30 183 366 549 415 372 787 06:45 230 663 487 1380 717 2043 363 1791 289 1526 652 331707:00 277 667 944 333 256 589 07:15 308 700 1008 291 248 539 07:30 397 700 1097 264 216 480 07:45 479 1461 684 2751 1163 4212 298 1186 177 897 475 208308:00 456 641 1097 238 153 391 08:15 496 618 1114 214 140 354 08:30 409 563 972 214 138 352 08:45 447 1808 528 2350 975 4158 172 838 126 557 298 139509:00 412 422 834 198 122 320 09:15 399 481 880 179 91 270 09:30 344 458 802 144 95 239 09:45 330 1485 420 1781 750 3266 135 656 65 373 200 102910:00 306 394 700 136 79 215 10:15 347 434 781 119 52 171 10:30 351 327 678 119 58 177 10:45 328 1332 459 1614 787 2946 76 450 39 228 115 67811:00 345 422 767 79 39 118 11:15 347 417 764 48 32 80 11:30 363 419 782 27 17 44 11:45 414 1469 442 1700 856 3169 33 187 17 105 50 292
TOTALS 8757 12317 21074 16586 14891 31477
SPLIT %41.6%58.4%40.1%52.7%47.3%59.9%
NB SB EB WB
25,343 27,208 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:30 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1840 2751 4471 2271 2373 4634
Pk Hr Factor 0.927 0.983 0.961 0.917 0.926 0.919
7 - 9 Volume 3269 5101 0 0 8370 4451 4329 0 0 8780
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:30 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1840 2751 0 0 4471 2271 2373 0 0 4634
Pk Hr Factor 0.927 0.983 0.000 0.000 0.961 0.917 0.926 0.000 0.000 0.919
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total52,551
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
El Camino Real Bet. Aviara Pkwy/Alga Rd & La Costa Ave
21:3021:4522:00
Total52,551
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/1/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_006
NB SB EB WB
25,276 27,498 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 30 16 46 305 437 742 00:15 35 9 44 391 378 76900:30 22 8 30 390 393 78300:45 18 105 7 40 25 145 421 1507 401 1609 822 311601:00 9 14 23 391 402 79301:15 14 7 21 390 412 80201:30 11 7 18 374 418 79201:45 10 44 3 31 13 75 406 1561 472 1704 878 326502:00 11 4 15 395 404 799 02:15 10 7 17 415 446 861 02:30 8 9 17 433 474 907 02:45 6 35 6 26 12 61 489 1732 449 1773 938 350503:00 12 14 26 510 465 975 03:15 10 12 22 504 523 1027 03:30 15 17 32 523 549 1072 03:45 21 58 23 66 44 124 525 2062 497 2034 1022 409604:00 9 19 28 512 473 985 04:15 16 30 46 491 528 1019 04:30 15 41 56 607 515 1122 04:45 45 85 62 152 107 237 554 2164 506 2022 1060 418605:00 29 63 92 551 553 1104 05:15 50 94 144 644 564 1208 05:30 86 124 210 568 586 1154 05:45 93 258 188 469 281 727 565 2328 522 2225 1087 455306:00 120 206 326 494 481 975 06:15 149 294 443 510 422 932 06:30 178 376 554 419 349 768 06:45 226 673 528 1404 754 2077 339 1762 287 1539 626 330107:00 258 626 884 308 255 563 07:15 336 700 1036 334 234 568 07:30 393 730 1123 296 230 526 07:45 467 1454 611 2667 1078 4121 310 1248 203 922 513 217008:00 471 595 1066 253 208 461 08:15 460 588 1048 263 166 429 08:30 428 638 1066 230 141 371 08:45 441 1800 558 2379 999 4179 226 972 158 673 384 164509:00 371 409 780 186 131 317 09:15 325 422 747 142 134 276 09:30 351 429 780 166 95 261 09:45 314 1361 447 1707 761 3068 175 669 98 458 273 112710:00 312 413 725 152 76 228 10:15 345 419 764 137 61 198 10:30 344 379 723 107 46 153 10:45 308 1309 404 1615 712 2924 103 499 43 226 146 72511:00 343 376 719 75 30 105 11:15 316 395 711 58 32 90 11:30 367 451 818 33 27 60 11:45 357 1383 413 1635 770 3018 41 207 33 122 74 329
TOTALS 8565 12191 20756 16711 15307 32018
SPLIT %41.3%58.7%39.3%52.2%47.8%60.7%
NB SB EB WB
25,276 27,498 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:30 17:00 17:00
AM Pk Volume 1826 2667 4315 2356 2225 4553
Pk Hr Factor 0.969 0.913 0.961 0.915 0.949 0.942
7 - 9 Volume 3254 5046 0 0 8300 4492 4247 0 0 8739
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:30 17:00 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1826 2667 0 0 4315 2356 2225 0 0 4553
Pk Hr Factor 0.969 0.913 0.000 0.000 0.961 0.915 0.949 0.000 0.000 0.942
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. Aviara Pkwy/Alga Rd & La Costa Ave
Thursday
5/2/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total52,774
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total52,774
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_006 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/1/2019El Camino Real Bet. Aviara Pkwy/Alga Rd &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_006 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/2/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. Aviara Pkwy/Alga Rd &
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 11
Location: El Camino Real
Between La Costa Avenue and Leucadia Boulevard
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_007
NB SB EB WB
17,625 18,259 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 7 12 19 255 272 527 00:15 10 7 17 302 303 60500:30 6 8 14 313 317 63000:45 8 31 1 28 9 59 275 1145 236 1128 511 227301:00 7 9 16 332 309 64101:15 4 11 15 341 303 64401:30 4 6 10 303 317 62001:45 3 18 7 33 10 51 290 1266 285 1214 575 248002:00 4 6 10 285 292 577 02:15 0 3 3 305 303 608 02:30 1 4 5 381 330 711 02:45 1 6 5 18 6 24 388 1359 319 1244 707 260303:00 3 3 6 405 284 689 03:15 9 4 13 350 325 675 03:30 4 5 9 434 304 738 03:45 6 22 13 25 19 47 406 1595 327 1240 733 283504:00 8 8 16 403 314 717 04:15 2 10 12 436 315 751 04:30 8 22 30 381 276 657 04:45 18 36 39 79 57 115 408 1628 337 1242 745 287005:00 16 28 44 439 316 755 05:15 26 35 61 429 374 803 05:30 28 56 84 399 377 776 05:45 36 106 70 189 106 295 380 1647 316 1383 696 303006:00 61 81 142 323 310 633 06:15 66 127 193 342 281 623 06:30 104 208 312 268 214 482 06:45 113 344 295 711 408 1055 237 1170 184 989 421 215907:00 151 374 525 215 151 366 07:15 169 484 653 204 181 385 07:30 277 510 787 232 134 366 07:45 299 896 508 1876 807 2772 192 843 132 598 324 144108:00 310 456 766 169 108 277 08:15 270 462 732 158 107 265 08:30 277 442 719 147 91 238 08:45 257 1114 385 1745 642 2859 118 592 93 399 211 99109:00 219 337 556 129 71 200 09:15 262 317 579 124 74 198 09:30 192 265 457 97 68 165 09:45 226 899 322 1241 548 2140 101 451 51 264 152 71510:00 225 296 521 88 45 133 10:15 253 286 539 72 42 114 10:30 240 270 510 62 44 106 10:45 248 966 338 1190 586 2156 39 261 32 163 71 42411:00 289 298 587 45 25 70 11:15 251 305 556 23 19 42 11:30 275 313 588 18 10 28 11:45 317 1132 279 1195 596 2327 12 98 11 65 23 163
TOTALS 5570 8330 13900 12055 9929 21984
SPLIT %40.1%59.9%38.7%54.8%45.2%61.3%
NB SB EB WB
17,625 18,259 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:15 07:30 15:30 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1187 1958 3092 1679 1404 3079
Pk Hr Factor 0.936 0.960 0.958 0.963 0.931 0.959
7 - 9 Volume 2010 3621 0 0 5631 3275 2625 0 0 5900
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1156 1958 0 0 3092 1675 1404 0 0 3079
Pk Hr Factor 0.932 0.960 0.000 0.000 0.958 0.954 0.931 0.000 0.000 0.959
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/1/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
El Camino Real Bet. La Costa Ave & Leucadia Blvd
21:3021:4522:00
Total35,884
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total35,884
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_007
NB SB EB WB
18,092 18,630 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 12 9 21 283 300 583 00:15 12 10 22 310 310 62000:30 4 6 10 333 273 60600:45 5 33 3 28 8 61 326 1252 294 1177 620 242901:00 6 8 14 305 307 61201:15 4 2 6 279 285 56401:30 2 3 5 329 285 61401:45 1 13 7 20 8 33 315 1228 342 1219 657 244702:00 3 3 6 307 283 590 02:15 2 3 5 307 318 625 02:30 2 6 8 341 349 690 02:45 3 10 2 14 5 24 374 1329 336 1286 710 261503:00 6 4 10 396 281 677 03:15 3 5 8 392 330 722 03:30 5 4 9 479 323 802 03:45 7 21 13 26 20 47 436 1703 362 1296 798 299904:00 9 7 16 375 306 681 04:15 7 15 22 405 330 735 04:30 9 24 33 450 306 756 04:45 12 37 33 79 45 116 385 1615 328 1270 713 288505:00 14 23 37 458 331 789 05:15 24 39 63 470 329 799 05:30 40 56 96 380 334 714 05:45 51 129 67 185 118 314 409 1717 335 1329 744 304606:00 60 86 146 355 283 638 06:15 66 129 195 343 256 599 06:30 84 232 316 271 233 504 06:45 107 317 301 748 408 1065 281 1250 204 976 485 222607:00 158 390 548 254 179 433 07:15 187 492 679 206 158 364 07:30 259 523 782 194 179 373 07:45 282 886 488 1893 770 2779 184 838 127 643 311 148108:00 270 484 754 183 139 322 08:15 289 418 707 186 123 309 08:30 286 460 746 175 88 263 08:45 252 1097 433 1795 685 2892 127 671 104 454 231 112509:00 209 289 498 140 103 243 09:15 212 297 509 132 103 235 09:30 211 263 474 139 92 231 09:45 225 857 312 1161 537 2018 175 586 76 374 251 96010:00 228 309 537 131 73 204 10:15 270 290 560 102 49 151 10:30 244 282 526 81 29 110 10:45 232 974 309 1190 541 2164 58 372 25 176 83 54811:00 276 291 567 46 12 58 11:15 231 308 539 32 18 50 11:30 292 314 606 11 16 27 11:45 254 1053 313 1226 567 2279 15 104 19 65 34 169
TOTALS 5427 8365 13792 12665 10265 22930
SPLIT %39.3%60.7%37.6%55.2%44.8%62.4%
NB SB EB WB
18,092 18,630 0 0
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:15 07:30 16:30 17:00 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1180 1987 3013 1763 1329 3057
Pk Hr Factor 0.886 0.950 0.963 0.938 0.992 0.957
7 - 9 Volume 1983 3688 0 0 5671 3332 2599 0 0 5931
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:30 16:30 17:00 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1127 1987 0 0 3013 1763 1329 0 0 3057
Pk Hr Factor 0.975 0.950 0.000 0.000 0.963 0.938 0.992 0.000 0.000 0.957
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total36,722
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
El Camino Real Bet. La Costa Ave & Leucadia Blvd
Thursday
5/2/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total36,722
Project #:CA19_4201_007 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/1/2019El Camino Real Bet. La Costa Ave & Leucadia
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_007 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/2/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
El Camino Real Bet. La Costa Ave & Leucadia
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 12
Location: College Boulevard
Between City Limits and Carlsbad Village Drive
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_008
NB SB EB WB
14,191 14,657 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 24 13 37 199 226 425 00:15 12 12 24 214 170 38400:30 9 14 23 182 228 41000:45 6 51 4 43 10 94 180 775 208 832 388 160701:00 5 5 10 174 229 40301:15 5 1 6 167 197 36401:30 10 2 12 225 223 44801:45 5 25 5 13 10 38 203 769 227 876 430 164502:00 7 2 9 172 230 402 02:15 3 7 10 219 245 464 02:30 7 4 11 237 207 444 02:45 5 22 6 19 11 41 237 865 195 877 432 174203:00 5 2 7 211 128 339 03:15 7 7 14 384 246 630 03:30 6 15 21 384 237 621 03:45 8 26 17 41 25 67 376 1355 237 848 613 220304:00 13 22 35 366 193 559 04:15 10 34 44 463 222 685 04:30 8 50 58 362 223 585 04:45 14 45 63 169 77 214 437 1628 218 856 655 248405:00 21 48 69 440 256 696 05:15 35 80 115 454 261 715 05:30 44 140 184 403 209 612 05:45 54 154 211 479 265 633 367 1664 247 973 614 263706:00 74 153 227 338 199 537 06:15 75 247 322 289 208 497 06:30 92 355 447 193 168 361 06:45 164 405 437 1192 601 1597 210 1030 158 733 368 176307:00 152 394 546 200 156 356 07:15 235 430 665 180 126 306 07:30 215 413 628 144 139 283 07:45 299 901 378 1615 677 2516 150 674 121 542 271 121608:00 238 309 547 111 101 212 08:15 166 324 490 125 111 236 08:30 153 280 433 109 104 213 08:45 153 710 289 1202 442 1912 98 443 102 418 200 86109:00 139 256 395 79 88 167 09:15 175 227 402 107 75 182 09:30 144 225 369 78 75 153 09:45 166 624 220 928 386 1552 67 331 78 316 145 64710:00 152 142 294 63 45 108 10:15 154 161 315 54 29 83 10:30 169 190 359 49 35 84 10:45 168 643 194 687 362 1330 37 203 34 143 71 34611:00 163 183 346 37 29 66 11:15 186 169 355 39 36 75 11:30 185 210 395 29 21 50 11:45 185 719 187 749 372 1468 24 129 20 106 44 235
TOTALS 4325 7137 11462 9866 7520 17386
SPLIT %37.7%62.3%39.7%56.7%43.3%60.3%
NB SB EB WB
14,191 14,657 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:15 06:45 07:15 16:45 17:00 16:45
AM Pk Volume 987 1674 2517 1734 973 2678
Pk Hr Factor 0.825 0.958 0.929 0.955 0.932 0.936
7 - 9 Volume 1611 2817 0 0 4428 3292 1829 0 0 5121
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:15 16:45 17:00 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 987 1615 0 0 2517 1734 973 0 0 2678
Pk Hr Factor 0.825 0.939 0.000 0.000 0.929 0.955 0.932 0.000 0.000 0.936
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total28,848
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
College Blvd Bet. City Limits & Carlsbad Village Dr
21:3021:4522:00
Total28,848
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_008
NB SB EB WB
14,688 14,879 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 26 19 45 203 201 404 00:15 13 11 24 192 202 39400:30 13 9 22 172 208 38000:45 11 63 13 52 24 115 191 758 220 831 411 158901:00 6 10 16 203 228 43101:15 8 5 13 218 211 42901:30 8 7 15 199 250 44901:45 7 29 1 23 8 52 224 844 202 891 426 173502:00 6 3 9 229 217 446 02:15 10 6 16 245 237 482 02:30 2 5 7 318 228 546 02:45 2 20 7 21 9 41 402 1194 231 913 633 210703:00 8 4 12 349 279 628 03:15 4 9 13 339 230 569 03:30 7 9 16 303 236 539 03:45 9 28 26 48 35 76 380 1371 246 991 626 236204:00 3 16 19 352 213 565 04:15 12 33 45 424 238 662 04:30 19 51 70 395 227 622 04:45 19 53 71 171 90 224 409 1580 222 900 631 248005:00 21 47 68 437 242 679 05:15 32 84 116 472 230 702 05:30 41 130 171 424 219 643 05:45 55 149 233 494 288 643 402 1735 228 919 630 265406:00 76 134 210 327 210 537 06:15 78 247 325 294 185 479 06:30 100 380 480 237 178 415 06:45 136 390 368 1129 504 1519 200 1058 170 743 370 180107:00 150 389 539 156 147 303 07:15 199 366 565 157 134 291 07:30 192 419 611 128 133 261 07:45 334 875 373 1547 707 2422 137 578 116 530 253 110808:00 275 383 658 129 129 258 08:15 210 334 544 106 124 230 08:30 199 271 470 118 100 218 08:45 185 869 267 1255 452 2124 88 441 103 456 191 89709:00 130 252 382 117 85 202 09:15 152 209 361 101 93 194 09:30 150 204 354 62 70 132 09:45 158 590 237 902 395 1492 53 333 55 303 108 63610:00 157 190 347 53 42 95 10:15 156 190 346 46 39 85 10:30 169 204 373 43 44 87 10:45 168 650 173 757 341 1407 48 190 49 174 97 36411:00 179 203 382 49 15 64 11:15 166 155 321 26 25 51 11:30 214 189 403 28 24 52 11:45 202 761 201 748 403 1509 26 129 17 81 43 210
TOTALS 4477 7147 11624 10211 7732 17943
SPLIT %38.5%61.5%39.3%56.9%43.1%60.7%
NB SB EB WB
14,688 14,879 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:15 16:45 15:00 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1018 1547 2541 1742 991 2655
Pk Hr Factor 0.762 0.923 0.899 0.923 0.888 0.946
7 - 9 Volume 1744 2802 0 0 4546 3315 1819 0 0 5134
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:15 16:45 16:15 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1018 1547 0 0 2541 1742 929 0 0 2655
Pk Hr Factor 0.762 0.923 0.000 0.000 0.899 0.923 0.960 0.000 0.000 0.946
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
College Blvd Bet. City Limits & Carlsbad Village Dr
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total29,567
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total29,567
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_008 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019College Blvd Bet. City Limits & Carlsbad
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_008 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
College Blvd Bet. City Limits & Carlsbad
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 13
Location: College Boulevard
Between Carlsbad Village Drive and Cannon Road
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_009
NB SB EB WB
11,078 11,180 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 23 9 32 164 136 300 00:15 14 5 19 158 115 27300:30 5 8 13 133 152 28500:45 4 46 2 24 6 70 133 588 166 569 299 115701:00 8 3 11 121 157 27801:15 4 1 5 181 148 32901:30 10 2 12 151 161 31201:45 5 27 3 9 8 36 153 606 139 605 292 121102:00 5 2 7 151 145 296 02:15 3 4 7 193 153 346 02:30 6 5 11 229 220 449 02:45 4 18 7 18 11 36 198 771 174 692 372 146303:00 3 2 5 205 141 346 03:15 5 5 10 275 189 464 03:30 4 13 17 292 161 453 03:45 5 17 16 36 21 53 308 1080 173 664 481 174404:00 9 22 31 305 123 428 04:15 6 32 38 399 120 519 04:30 5 53 58 334 135 469 04:45 9 29 65 172 74 201 364 1402 142 520 506 192205:00 12 48 60 397 146 543 05:15 15 78 93 416 142 558 05:30 19 141 160 378 121 499 05:45 30 76 213 480 243 556 352 1543 117 526 469 206906:00 41 148 189 264 125 389 06:15 37 247 284 250 105 355 06:30 47 317 364 167 88 255 06:45 93 218 396 1108 489 1326 174 855 92 410 266 126507:00 105 439 544 149 81 230 07:15 164 417 581 145 60 205 07:30 164 367 531 106 90 196 07:45 193 626 361 1584 554 2210 129 529 66 297 195 82608:00 125 340 465 93 66 159 08:15 110 298 408 95 60 155 08:30 96 273 369 96 53 149 08:45 100 431 244 1155 344 1586 73 357 45 224 118 58109:00 106 187 293 59 51 110 09:15 92 206 298 86 44 130 09:30 99 192 291 70 44 114 09:45 107 404 173 758 280 1162 60 275 43 182 103 45710:00 92 121 213 59 29 88 10:15 99 118 217 48 18 66 10:30 107 131 238 40 18 58 10:45 102 400 129 499 231 899 37 184 23 88 60 27211:00 111 113 224 39 23 62 11:15 109 114 223 35 17 52 11:30 115 154 269 31 13 44 11:45 131 466 118 499 249 965 25 130 8 61 33 191
TOTALS 2758 6342 9100 8320 4838 13158
SPLIT %30.3%69.7%40.9%63.2%36.8%59.1%
NB SB EB WB
11,078 11,180 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:15 06:45 07:00 16:45 14:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 646 1619 2210 1555 724 2106
Pk Hr Factor 0.837 0.922 0.951 0.934 0.823 0.944
7 - 9 Volume 1057 2739 0 0 3796 2945 1046 0 0 3991
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:45 16:30 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 646 1584 0 0 2210 1555 565 0 0 2106
Pk Hr Factor 0.837 0.902 0.000 0.000 0.951 0.934 0.967 0.000 0.000 0.944
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
College Blvd Bet. Carlsbad Village Dr & Cannon Rd
21:3021:4522:00
Total22,258
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total22,258
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_009
NB SB EB WB
11,510 11,291 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 22 10 32 175 136 311 00:15 7 5 12 136 153 28900:30 11 4 15 126 144 27000:45 5 45 4 23 9 68 122 559 156 589 278 114801:00 5 9 14 152 162 31401:15 8 3 11 148 148 29601:30 9 5 14 189 184 37301:45 6 28 1 18 7 46 190 679 129 623 319 130202:00 5 2 7 195 134 329 02:15 6 5 11 199 164 363 02:30 2 5 7 230 202 432 02:45 1 14 10 22 11 36 362 986 170 670 532 165603:00 6 3 9 252 179 431 03:15 3 8 11 255 177 432 03:30 6 10 16 273 138 411 03:45 6 21 23 44 29 65 316 1096 172 666 488 176204:00 2 14 16 316 134 450 04:15 6 35 41 383 148 531 04:30 10 54 64 362 143 505 04:45 10 28 71 174 81 202 387 1448 151 576 538 202405:00 13 51 64 379 128 507 05:15 15 74 89 410 130 540 05:30 21 143 164 399 135 534 05:45 23 72 227 495 250 567 357 1545 132 525 489 207006:00 41 136 177 296 130 426 06:15 38 236 274 255 110 365 06:30 52 331 383 195 104 299 06:45 88 219 336 1039 424 1258 163 909 90 434 253 134307:00 88 340 428 130 95 225 07:15 87 339 426 120 63 183 07:30 133 360 493 102 89 191 07:45 224 532 374 1413 598 1945 108 460 64 311 172 77108:00 168 422 590 112 73 185 08:15 174 353 527 80 81 161 08:30 112 241 353 94 74 168 08:45 109 563 252 1268 361 1831 80 366 66 294 146 66009:00 94 204 298 117 45 162 09:15 94 180 274 94 50 144 09:30 100 164 264 64 41 105 09:45 96 384 174 722 270 1106 63 338 35 171 98 50910:00 98 156 254 55 21 76 10:15 104 146 250 37 31 68 10:30 100 127 227 48 30 78 10:45 121 423 126 555 247 978 38 178 31 113 69 29111:00 128 124 252 46 10 56 11:15 104 113 217 23 13 36 11:30 134 127 261 30 13 43 11:45 128 494 139 503 267 997 24 123 7 43 31 166
TOTALS 2823 6276 9099 8687 5015 13702
SPLIT %31.0%69.0%39.9%63.4%36.6%60.1%
NB SB EB WB
11,510 11,291 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:45 14:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 699 1509 2208 1575 728 2119
Pk Hr Factor 0.780 0.894 0.923 0.960 0.901 0.981
7 - 9 Volume 1095 2681 0 0 3776 2993 1101 0 0 4094
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:45 16:00 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 699 1509 0 0 2208 1575 576 0 0 2119
Pk Hr Factor 0.780 0.894 0.000 0.000 0.923 0.960 0.954 0.000 0.000 0.981
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total22,801
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
College Blvd Bet. Carlsbad Village Dr & Cannon Rd
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total22,801
Project #:CA19_4201_009 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019College Blvd Bet. Carlsbad Village Dr &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_009 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
College Blvd Bet. Carlsbad Village Dr &
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 14
Location: College Boulevard
Between El Camino Real and Aston Avenue
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_010
NB SB EB WB
6,419 6,671 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 5 2 7 112 143 255 00:15 3 2 5 103 116 21900:30 2 8 10 114 118 23200:45 3 13 6 18 9 31 116 445 126 503 242 94801:00 4 1 5 108 113 22101:15 2 4 6 110 99 20901:30 4 4 8 107 99 20601:45 3 13 4 13 7 26 97 422 100 411 197 83302:00 4 2 6 94 110 204 02:15 1 4 5 94 118 212 02:30 2 3 5 130 150 280 02:45 4 11 5 14 9 25 107 425 153 531 260 95603:00 2 3 5 100 130 230 03:15 2 2 4 98 115 213 03:30 2 3 5 102 109 211 03:45 3 9 7 15 10 24 103 403 97 451 200 85404:00 2 3 5 147 143 290 04:15 6 16 22 113 119 232 04:30 12 11 23 185 144 329 04:45 11 31 25 55 36 86 135 580 152 558 287 113805:00 26 23 49 167 204 371 05:15 25 19 44 145 185 330 05:30 35 40 75 122 157 279 05:45 51 137 80 162 131 299 105 539 115 661 220 120006:00 37 49 86 82 135 217 06:15 35 57 92 76 102 178 06:30 56 73 129 70 92 162 06:45 104 232 107 286 211 518 42 270 73 402 115 67207:00 79 82 161 37 40 77 07:15 99 106 205 30 47 77 07:30 162 131 293 26 37 63 07:45 204 544 166 485 370 1029 33 126 38 162 71 28808:00 236 141 377 39 45 84 08:15 165 137 302 41 36 77 08:30 165 134 299 30 28 58 08:45 163 729 117 529 280 1258 28 138 23 132 51 27009:00 139 108 247 25 28 53 09:15 126 103 229 20 17 37 09:30 109 73 182 18 11 29 09:45 104 478 79 363 183 841 21 84 13 69 34 15310:00 81 87 168 13 9 22 10:15 77 95 172 5 7 12 10:30 85 74 159 8 14 22 10:45 80 323 95 351 175 674 9 35 10 40 19 7511:00 86 87 173 21 11 32 11:15 94 97 191 10 7 17 11:30 100 102 202 7 10 17 11:45 108 388 143 429 251 817 6 44 3 31 9 75
TOTALS 2908 2720 5628 3511 3951 7462
SPLIT %51.7%48.3%43.0%47.1%52.9%57.0%
NB SB EB WB
6,419 6,671 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:45 07:45 16:30 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 770 578 1348 632 698 1317
Pk Hr Factor 0.816 0.870 0.894 0.854 0.855 0.887
7 - 9 Volume 1273 1014 0 0 2287 1119 1219 0 0 2338
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:45 07:45 16:30 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 770 578 0 0 1348 632 698 0 0 1317
Pk Hr Factor 0.816 0.870 0.000 0.000 0.894 0.854 0.855 0.000 0.000 0.887
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/8/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
College Blvd Bet. El Camino Real & Aston Ave
21:3021:4522:00
Total13,090
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total13,090
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_010
NB SB EB WB
6,258 6,682 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 6 7 13 110 135 245 00:15 1 2 3 112 121 23300:30 3 7 10 104 122 22600:45 3 13 3 19 6 32 116 442 113 491 229 93301:00 3 0 3 121 120 24101:15 3 0 3 116 131 24701:30 2 2 4 122 113 23501:45 2 10 0 2 2 12 121 480 94 458 215 93802:00 4 4 8 78 108 186 02:15 1 5 6 80 107 187 02:30 7 2 9 120 111 231 02:45 1 13 3 14 4 27 99 377 147 473 246 85003:00 1 4 5 101 109 210 03:15 4 2 6 78 113 191 03:30 2 2 4 124 110 234 03:45 4 11 7 15 11 26 126 429 101 433 227 86204:00 6 8 14 129 147 276 04:15 8 10 18 108 118 226 04:30 11 9 20 156 131 287 04:45 15 40 17 44 32 84 135 528 149 545 284 107305:00 24 17 41 191 199 390 05:15 25 31 56 116 186 302 05:30 38 38 76 117 170 287 05:45 39 126 71 157 110 283 89 513 139 694 228 120706:00 35 42 77 73 137 210 06:15 39 56 95 69 110 179 06:30 58 84 142 49 98 147 06:45 108 240 97 279 205 519 36 227 74 419 110 64607:00 115 99 214 32 54 86 07:15 136 113 249 37 59 96 07:30 169 134 303 33 47 80 07:45 160 580 147 493 307 1073 42 144 37 197 79 34108:00 169 142 311 29 36 65 08:15 151 134 285 39 43 82 08:30 138 127 265 22 23 45 08:45 162 620 162 565 324 1185 24 114 15 117 39 23109:00 150 124 274 20 24 44 09:15 108 79 187 23 22 45 09:30 100 72 172 25 11 36 09:45 96 454 103 378 199 832 16 84 11 68 27 15210:00 87 83 170 16 10 26 10:15 94 80 174 14 12 26 10:30 66 71 137 12 14 26 10:45 111 358 73 307 184 665 8 50 15 51 23 10111:00 69 89 158 16 12 28 11:15 94 94 188 12 9 21 11:30 91 130 221 7 8 15 11:45 111 365 115 428 226 793 5 40 6 35 11 75
TOTALS 2830 2701 5531 3428 3981 7409
SPLIT %51.2%48.8%42.7%46.3%53.7%57.3%
NB SB EB WB
6,258 6,682 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:30 08:00 07:30 16:30 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 649 565 1206 598 704 1263
Pk Hr Factor 0.960 0.872 0.969 0.783 0.884 0.810
7 - 9 Volume 1200 1058 0 0 2258 1041 1239 0 0 2280
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 08:00 07:30 16:30 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 649 565 0 0 1206 598 704 0 0 1263
Pk Hr Factor 0.960 0.872 0.000 0.000 0.969 0.783 0.884 0.000 0.000 0.810
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total12,940
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
College Blvd Bet. El Camino Real & Aston Ave
Thursday
5/9/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total12,940
Project #:CA19_4201_010 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019College Blvd Bet. El Camino Real & Aston
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_010 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/9/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
College Blvd Bet. El Camino Real & Aston
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 15
Location: College Boulevard
Between Aston Avenue and Palomar Airport Road
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_011
NB SB EB WB
7,356 8,786 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 3 5 8 102 225 327 00:15 5 6 11 140 171 31100:30 4 6 10 106 160 26600:45 2 14 8 25 10 39 164 512 173 729 337 124101:00 3 2 5 138 152 29001:15 2 5 7 130 141 27101:30 4 7 11 113 126 23901:45 2 11 6 20 8 31 111 492 134 553 245 104502:00 6 6 12 109 168 277 02:15 2 5 7 113 156 269 02:30 3 4 7 108 219 327 02:45 3 14 6 21 9 35 89 419 221 764 310 118303:00 4 4 8 96 182 278 03:15 3 3 6 93 183 276 03:30 2 3 5 95 201 296 03:45 6 15 9 19 15 34 85 369 170 736 255 110504:00 4 4 8 104 219 323 04:15 9 18 27 91 222 313 04:30 18 12 30 113 236 349 04:45 27 58 20 54 47 112 91 399 224 901 315 130005:00 32 26 58 96 346 442 05:15 36 19 55 107 308 415 05:30 64 30 94 92 282 374 05:45 99 231 41 116 140 347 81 376 181 1117 262 149306:00 65 40 105 76 188 264 06:15 66 54 120 56 158 214 06:30 105 70 175 59 116 175 06:45 163 399 86 250 249 649 36 227 115 577 151 80407:00 148 60 208 29 77 106 07:15 159 94 253 30 63 93 07:30 264 108 372 26 41 67 07:45 295 866 132 394 427 1260 43 128 49 230 92 35808:00 313 116 429 37 60 97 08:15 275 113 388 44 40 84 08:30 238 109 347 30 39 69 08:45 258 1084 111 449 369 1533 31 142 25 164 56 30609:00 181 99 280 22 37 59 09:15 168 111 279 21 25 46 09:30 126 86 212 25 14 39 09:45 149 624 85 381 234 1005 21 89 14 90 35 17910:00 100 119 219 11 15 26 10:15 117 130 247 8 9 17 10:30 96 104 200 10 15 25 10:45 93 406 102 455 195 861 8 37 10 49 18 8611:00 92 123 215 14 16 30 11:15 103 144 247 8 8 16 11:30 117 155 272 6 13 19 11:45 100 412 230 652 330 1064 4 32 3 40 7 72
TOTALS 4134 2836 6970 3222 5950 9172
SPLIT %59.3%40.7%43.2%35.1%64.9%56.8%
NB SB EB WB
7,356 8,786 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:30 11:45 07:30 12:15 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1147 786 1616 548 1160 1546
Pk Hr Factor 0.916 0.854 0.942 0.835 0.838 0.874
7 - 9 Volume 1950 843 0 0 2793 775 2018 0 0 2793
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:45 07:30 16:30 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1147 470 0 0 1616 407 1160 0 0 1546
Pk Hr Factor 0.916 0.890 0.000 0.000 0.942 0.900 0.838 0.000 0.000 0.874
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/8/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
College Blvd Bet. Aston Ave & Palomar Airport Rd
21:3021:4522:00
Total16,142
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total16,142
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_011
NB SB EB WB
7,181 8,230 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 4 7 11 127 203 330 00:15 3 5 8 120 150 27000:30 2 9 11 109 149 25800:45 4 13 3 24 7 37 150 506 135 637 285 114301:00 2 2 4 137 147 28401:15 4 0 4 157 149 30601:30 2 1 3 139 134 27301:45 2 10 2 5 4 15 128 561 125 555 253 111602:00 4 5 9 82 136 218 02:15 1 5 6 77 123 200 02:30 8 5 13 102 166 268 02:45 1 14 6 21 7 35 90 351 188 613 278 96403:00 1 4 5 112 170 282 03:15 8 2 10 66 169 235 03:30 2 3 5 98 169 267 03:45 9 20 7 16 16 36 104 380 169 677 273 105704:00 4 7 11 95 238 333 04:15 14 10 24 78 193 271 04:30 21 7 28 107 220 327 04:45 26 65 10 34 36 99 87 367 237 888 324 125505:00 37 15 52 117 329 446 05:15 33 25 58 90 294 384 05:30 63 26 89 97 241 338 05:45 79 212 37 103 116 315 81 385 218 1082 299 146706:00 67 34 101 74 176 250 06:15 77 46 123 55 161 216 06:30 101 56 157 50 137 187 06:45 164 409 73 209 237 618 36 215 95 569 131 78407:00 172 73 245 33 76 109 07:15 181 100 281 36 71 107 07:30 263 104 367 30 63 93 07:45 258 874 115 392 373 1266 41 140 49 259 90 39908:00 241 107 348 27 46 73 08:15 248 103 351 40 50 90 08:30 228 109 337 24 31 55 08:45 254 971 138 457 392 1428 18 109 23 150 41 25909:00 185 88 273 18 29 47 09:15 169 93 262 22 30 52 09:30 124 79 203 26 15 41 09:45 140 618 113 373 253 991 16 82 18 92 34 17410:00 110 90 200 15 14 29 10:15 114 88 202 14 11 25 10:30 85 94 179 10 20 30 10:45 110 419 88 360 198 779 8 47 14 59 22 10611:00 85 119 204 8 20 28 11:15 106 132 238 12 9 21 11:30 105 175 280 5 18 23 11:45 89 385 176 602 265 987 3 28 6 53 9 81
TOTALS 4010 2596 6606 3171 5634 8805
SPLIT %60.7%39.3%42.9%36.0%64.0%57.1%
NB SB EB WB
7,181 8,230 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:30 11:30 07:30 12:45 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1010 704 1439 583 1101 1492
Pk Hr Factor 0.960 0.867 0.964 0.928 0.837 0.836
7 - 9 Volume 1845 849 0 0 2694 752 1970 0 0 2722
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 08:00 07:30 16:30 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1010 457 0 0 1439 401 1101 0 0 1492
Pk Hr Factor 0.960 0.828 0.000 0.000 0.964 0.857 0.837 0.000 0.000 0.836
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total15,411
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
College Blvd Bet. Aston Ave & Palomar Airport Rd
Thursday
5/9/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total15,411
Project #:CA19_4201_011 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019College Blvd Bet. Aston Ave & Palomar
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_011 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/9/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
College Blvd Bet. Aston Ave & Palomar
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 16
Location: Aviara Parkway
Between Palomar Airport Road and Poinsettia Lane
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_012
NB SB EB WB
6,879 6,337 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 3 5 8 85 100 185 00:15 1 4 5 84 107 19100:30 4 2 6 67 95 16200:45 1 9 4 15 5 24 107 343 110 412 217 75501:00 4 1 5 120 90 21001:15 2 4 6 98 88 18601:30 0 2 2 109 94 20301:45 3 9 2 9 5 18 107 434 118 390 225 82402:00 1 6 7 97 92 189 02:15 2 2 4 116 122 238 02:30 3 2 5 116 122 238 02:45 2 8 2 12 4 20 146 475 149 485 295 96003:00 2 1 3 100 143 243 03:15 1 4 5 118 99 217 03:30 8 0 8 114 136 250 03:45 2 13 1 6 3 19 99 431 148 526 247 95704:00 5 2 7 112 138 250 04:15 8 2 10 118 156 274 04:30 10 3 13 119 174 293 04:45 8 31 4 11 12 42 87 436 197 665 284 110105:00 23 6 29 103 224 327 05:15 31 16 47 95 217 312 05:30 34 5 39 116 204 320 05:45 44 132 14 41 58 173 113 427 172 817 285 124406:00 41 21 62 85 164 249 06:15 40 27 67 80 146 226 06:30 78 41 119 72 125 197 06:45 107 266 53 142 160 408 56 293 107 542 163 83507:00 105 65 170 42 82 124 07:15 141 98 239 40 77 117 07:30 205 81 286 36 76 112 07:45 286 737 80 324 366 1061 42 160 70 305 112 46508:00 266 74 340 44 59 103 08:15 284 69 353 53 53 106 08:30 221 77 298 43 62 105 08:45 202 973 69 289 271 1262 36 176 60 234 96 41009:00 151 72 223 33 45 78 09:15 135 63 198 42 37 79 09:30 147 60 207 27 19 46 09:45 139 572 62 257 201 829 26 128 33 134 59 26210:00 105 63 168 10 19 29 10:15 108 70 178 11 14 25 10:30 83 65 148 10 13 23 10:45 90 386 62 260 152 646 12 43 6 52 18 9511:00 85 81 166 11 19 30 11:15 87 72 159 11 8 19 11:30 94 98 192 7 6 13 11:45 95 361 121 372 216 733 7 36 4 37 11 73
TOTALS 3497 1738 5235 3382 4599 7981
SPLIT %66.8%33.2%39.6%42.4%57.6%60.4%
NB SB EB WB
6,879 6,337 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 11:30 07:45 14:30 16:45 17:00
AM Pk Volume 1057 426 1357 480 842 1244
Pk Hr Factor 0.924 0.880 0.927 0.822 0.940 0.951
7 - 9 Volume 1710 613 0 0 2323 863 1482 0 0 2345
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:45 16:00 16:45 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1057 333 0 0 1357 436 842 0 0 1244
Pk Hr Factor 0.924 0.849 0.000 0.000 0.927 0.916 0.940 0.000 0.000 0.951
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/8/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Aviara Pkwy Bet. Palomar Airport Rd & Poinsettia Ln
21:3021:4522:00
Total13,216
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total13,216
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_012
NB SB EB WB
6,809 6,500 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 5 4 9 117 105 222 00:15 3 5 8 109 102 21100:30 2 4 6 85 90 17500:45 4 14 4 17 8 31 139 450 103 400 242 85001:00 0 2 2 102 120 22201:15 5 3 8 125 129 25401:30 2 2 4 131 109 24001:45 2 9 2 9 4 18 130 488 95 453 225 94102:00 1 2 3 110 95 205 02:15 2 2 4 89 97 186 02:30 2 0 2 110 105 215 02:45 2 7 2 6 4 13 95 404 135 432 230 83603:00 2 1 3 103 123 226 03:15 5 2 7 110 147 257 03:30 5 2 7 110 153 263 03:45 5 17 0 5 5 22 104 427 143 566 247 99304:00 4 8 12 103 179 282 04:15 8 5 13 89 175 264 04:30 9 4 13 111 168 279 04:45 13 34 9 26 22 60 94 397 171 693 265 109005:00 25 8 33 94 230 324 05:15 25 11 36 102 230 332 05:30 30 8 38 114 184 298 05:45 40 120 15 42 55 162 102 412 172 816 274 122806:00 38 18 56 97 159 256 06:15 59 27 86 71 132 203 06:30 76 41 117 49 109 158 06:45 129 302 41 127 170 429 66 283 109 509 175 79207:00 155 65 220 39 80 119 07:15 136 103 239 41 86 127 07:30 192 105 297 48 73 121 07:45 255 738 77 350 332 1088 40 168 63 302 103 47008:00 230 97 327 40 65 105 08:15 234 74 308 32 67 99 08:30 214 96 310 16 51 67 08:45 211 889 96 363 307 1252 36 124 43 226 79 35009:00 178 72 250 18 38 56 09:15 143 60 203 25 44 69 09:30 119 60 179 23 35 58 09:45 129 569 55 247 184 816 15 81 21 138 36 21910:00 119 67 186 20 24 44 10:15 120 72 192 11 14 25 10:30 86 75 161 13 14 27 10:45 129 454 70 284 199 738 16 60 16 68 32 12811:00 86 74 160 9 16 25 11:15 84 86 170 10 10 20 11:30 82 108 190 2 9 11 11:45 83 335 113 381 196 716 6 27 5 40 11 67
TOTALS 3488 1857 5345 3321 4643 7964
SPLIT %65.3%34.7%40.2%41.7%58.3%59.8%
NB SB EB WB
6,809 6,500 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 11:30 07:45 12:45 17:00 17:00
AM Pk Volume 933 428 1277 497 816 1228
Pk Hr Factor 0.915 0.947 0.962 0.894 0.887 0.925
7 - 9 Volume 1627 713 0 0 2340 809 1509 0 0 2318
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:45 17:00 17:00 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 933 382 0 0 1277 412 816 0 0 1228
Pk Hr Factor 0.915 0.910 0.000 0.000 0.962 0.904 0.887 0.000 0.000 0.925
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total13,309
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Aviara Pkwy Bet. Palomar Airport Rd & Poinsettia Ln
Thursday
5/9/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total13,309
Project #:CA19_4201_012 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019Aviara Pkwy Bet. Palomar Airport Rd &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_012 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/9/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Aviara Pkwy Bet. Palomar Airport Rd &
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
17
Melrose Drive
Between City Limits and Palomar Airport Road
15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_013
NB SB EB WB
15,573 16,868 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 22 9 31 233 232 465 00:15 7 5 12 232 227 45900:30 14 11 25 205 274 47900:45 23 66 9 34 32 100 229 899 227 960 456 185901:00 24 7 31 235 206 44101:15 18 5 23 235 194 42901:30 13 5 18 242 252 49401:45 3 58 6 23 9 81 226 938 209 861 435 179902:00 6 1 7 244 206 450 02:15 10 2 12 264 254 518 02:30 3 9 12 319 239 558 02:45 5 24 11 23 16 47 303 1130 241 940 544 207003:00 2 7 9 287 251 538 03:15 4 12 16 304 239 543 03:30 8 32 40 319 262 581 03:45 12 26 51 102 63 128 327 1237 244 996 571 223304:00 12 23 35 372 265 637 04:15 15 36 51 407 300 707 04:30 14 64 78 386 297 683 04:45 26 67 95 218 121 285 382 1547 279 1141 661 268805:00 28 83 111 409 322 731 05:15 47 96 143 446 292 738 05:30 57 188 245 435 252 687 05:45 88 220 253 620 341 840 373 1663 223 1089 596 275206:00 79 186 265 338 248 586 06:15 77 270 347 301 209 510 06:30 117 366 483 283 182 465 06:45 175 448 428 1250 603 1698 210 1132 159 798 369 193007:00 156 442 598 207 161 368 07:15 191 465 656 195 118 313 07:30 230 514 744 191 133 324 07:45 252 829 490 1911 742 2740 175 768 95 507 270 127508:00 286 421 707 146 89 235 08:15 284 455 739 142 92 234 08:30 253 456 709 128 75 203 08:45 230 1053 372 1704 602 2757 124 540 70 326 194 86609:00 214 298 512 117 62 179 09:15 185 295 480 107 50 157 09:30 166 275 441 89 72 161 09:45 150 715 259 1127 409 1842 85 398 45 229 130 62710:00 158 220 378 76 43 119 10:15 174 228 402 65 39 104 10:30 167 212 379 66 36 102 10:45 163 662 224 884 387 1546 61 268 30 148 91 41611:00 177 215 392 46 21 67 11:15 198 235 433 37 25 62 11:30 184 251 435 26 15 41 11:45 194 753 200 901 394 1654 23 132 15 76 38 208
TOTALS 4921 8797 13718 10652 8071 18723
SPLIT %35.9%64.1%42.3%56.9%43.1%57.7%
NB SB EB WB
15,573 16,868 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:45 16:15 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1075 1911 2932 1672 1198 2817
Pk Hr Factor 0.940 0.929 0.985 0.937 0.930 0.954
7 - 9 Volume 1882 3615 0 0 5497 3210 2230 0 0 5440
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:45 16:15 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1075 1911 0 0 2932 1672 1198 0 0 2817
Pk Hr Factor 0.940 0.929 0.000 0.000 0.985 0.937 0.930 0.000 0.000 0.954
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/1/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Melrose Dr Bet. City Limits & Palomar Airport Rd
21:3021:4522:00
Total32,441
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total32,441
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_013
NB SB EB WB
15,590 16,915 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 17 12 29 212 238 450 00:15 22 10 32 231 234 46500:30 16 11 27 232 249 48100:45 10 65 10 43 20 108 240 915 213 934 453 184901:00 23 4 27 223 249 47201:15 15 6 21 233 223 45601:30 5 4 9 253 261 51401:45 8 51 9 23 17 74 265 974 210 943 475 191702:00 11 3 14 229 246 475 02:15 3 9 12 253 227 480 02:30 6 8 14 257 252 509 02:45 6 26 2 22 8 48 297 1036 249 974 546 201003:00 4 7 11 271 249 520 03:15 8 7 15 335 249 584 03:30 7 20 27 354 295 649 03:45 14 33 50 84 64 117 358 1318 237 1030 595 234804:00 10 28 38 348 259 607 04:15 10 38 48 383 260 643 04:30 14 64 78 425 283 708 04:45 23 57 98 228 121 285 412 1568 292 1094 704 266205:00 40 91 131 418 312 730 05:15 41 104 145 401 302 703 05:30 43 200 243 429 271 700 05:45 89 213 249 644 338 857 352 1600 250 1135 602 273506:00 83 189 272 325 214 539 06:15 79 270 349 329 184 513 06:30 113 388 501 242 169 411 06:45 179 454 426 1273 605 1727 259 1155 157 724 416 187907:00 162 446 608 203 146 349 07:15 207 474 681 200 130 330 07:30 227 493 720 156 129 285 07:45 247 843 480 1893 727 2736 156 715 83 488 239 120308:00 270 470 740 146 79 225 08:15 253 454 707 141 91 232 08:30 221 403 624 112 73 185 08:45 231 975 360 1687 591 2662 147 546 76 319 223 86509:00 211 317 528 122 74 196 09:15 158 243 401 100 44 144 09:30 170 266 436 103 73 176 09:45 179 718 254 1080 433 1798 87 412 52 243 139 65510:00 149 209 358 74 40 114 10:15 154 219 373 69 39 108 10:30 197 235 432 73 36 109 10:45 183 683 223 886 406 1569 79 295 42 157 121 45211:00 164 216 380 58 25 83 11:15 197 208 405 56 19 75 11:30 185 249 434 35 21 56 11:45 213 759 259 932 472 1691 30 179 14 79 44 258
TOTALS 4877 8795 13672 10713 8120 18833
SPLIT %35.7%64.3%42.1%56.9%43.1%57.9%
NB SB EB WB
15,590 16,915 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 16:45 16:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 997 1917 2894 1660 1189 2845
Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0.972 0.978 0.967 0.953 0.974
7 - 9 Volume 1818 3580 0 0 5398 3168 2229 0 0 5397
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 16:45 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 997 1917 0 0 2894 1660 1189 0 0 2845
Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0.972 0.000 0.000 0.978 0.967 0.953 0.000 0.000 0.974
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total32,505
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Melrose Dr Bet. City Limits & Palomar Airport Rd
Thursday
5/2/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total32,505
Project #:CA19_4201_013 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/1/2019Melrose Dr Bet. City Limits & Palomar
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_013 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/2/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Melrose Dr Bet. City Limits & Palomar
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 18
Location: Melrose Drive
Between Palomar Airport Road and Poinsettia Ln
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_014
NB SB EB WB
14,345 13,012 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 7 13 20 210 147 357 00:15 4 5 9 162 154 31600:30 8 11 19 173 162 33500:45 6 25 4 33 10 58 187 732 173 636 360 136801:00 4 8 12 164 152 31601:15 5 2 7 189 170 35901:30 6 3 9 220 198 41801:45 1 16 5 18 6 34 197 770 186 706 383 147602:00 1 2 3 187 197 384 02:15 3 2 5 280 190 470 02:30 2 7 9 293 205 498 02:45 5 11 2 13 7 24 249 1009 205 797 454 180603:00 1 3 4 251 230 481 03:15 4 3 7 247 261 508 03:30 7 15 22 285 223 508 03:45 13 25 5 26 18 51 303 1086 210 924 513 201004:00 10 8 18 311 285 596 04:15 9 5 14 344 280 624 04:30 11 18 29 306 294 600 04:45 22 52 20 51 42 103 355 1316 274 1133 629 244905:00 21 30 51 325 317 642 05:15 34 44 78 350 313 663 05:30 49 83 132 314 293 607 05:45 88 192 103 260 191 452 319 1308 226 1149 545 245706:00 65 99 164 252 241 493 06:15 98 144 242 220 260 480 06:30 132 239 371 217 205 422 06:45 227 522 279 761 506 1283 189 878 157 863 346 174107:00 223 313 536 156 172 328 07:15 302 312 614 136 138 274 07:30 378 315 693 152 130 282 07:45 412 1315 362 1302 774 2617 141 585 109 549 250 113408:00 430 316 746 103 117 220 08:15 410 317 727 92 124 216 08:30 343 268 611 86 97 183 08:45 330 1513 205 1106 535 2619 91 372 88 426 179 79809:00 233 176 409 65 78 143 09:15 224 198 422 58 49 107 09:30 208 141 349 53 58 111 09:45 204 869 138 653 342 1522 41 217 50 235 91 45210:00 160 140 300 34 37 71 10:15 182 170 352 29 37 66 10:30 173 150 323 27 33 60 10:45 150 665 146 606 296 1271 32 122 25 132 57 25411:00 182 139 321 16 19 35 11:15 141 133 274 20 17 37 11:30 182 142 324 17 15 32 11:45 177 682 156 570 333 1252 10 63 12 63 22 126
TOTALS 5887 5399 11286 8458 7613 16071
SPLIT %52.2%47.8%41.3%52.6%47.4%58.7%
NB SB EB WB
14,345 13,012 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:45 16:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1630 1310 2940 1344 1198 2541
Pk Hr Factor 0.948 0.905 0.950 0.946 0.945 0.958
7 - 9 Volume 2828 2408 0 0 5236 2624 2282 0 0 4906
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:45 16:30 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1630 1310 0 0 2940 1344 1198 0 0 2541
Pk Hr Factor 0.948 0.905 0.000 0.000 0.950 0.946 0.945 0.000 0.000 0.958
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/1/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Melrose Dr Bet. Palomar Airport Rd & Poinsettia Ln
21:3021:4522:00
Total27,357
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total27,357
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_014
NB SB EB WB
14,921 13,479 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 7 11 18 196 186 382 00:15 18 11 29 183 160 34300:30 9 9 18 159 178 33700:45 3 37 8 39 11 76 198 736 153 677 351 141301:00 6 7 13 223 145 36801:15 2 8 10 175 182 35701:30 1 2 3 207 201 40801:45 5 14 7 24 12 38 198 803 201 729 399 153202:00 6 4 10 196 211 407 02:15 2 4 6 203 191 394 02:30 7 1 8 258 202 460 02:45 1 16 2 11 3 27 272 929 248 852 520 178103:00 2 2 4 253 276 529 03:15 6 3 9 348 259 607 03:30 3 11 14 393 269 662 03:45 13 24 10 26 23 50 321 1315 233 1037 554 235204:00 7 8 15 302 257 559 04:15 5 10 15 335 254 589 04:30 15 20 35 359 286 645 04:45 21 48 24 62 45 110 325 1321 324 1121 649 244205:00 16 29 45 366 330 696 05:15 30 36 66 348 324 672 05:30 47 96 143 347 317 664 05:45 75 168 130 291 205 459 294 1355 260 1231 554 258606:00 77 121 198 275 224 499 06:15 106 179 285 236 208 444 06:30 147 228 375 216 183 399 06:45 242 572 274 802 516 1374 207 934 158 773 365 170707:00 259 261 520 132 163 295 07:15 347 329 676 162 156 318 07:30 396 357 753 135 144 279 07:45 401 1403 319 1266 720 2669 131 560 117 580 248 114008:00 449 338 787 117 113 230 08:15 378 338 716 90 97 187 08:30 353 279 632 83 96 179 08:45 350 1530 197 1152 547 2682 111 401 94 400 205 80109:00 225 188 413 85 79 164 09:15 214 166 380 74 75 149 09:30 196 150 346 75 62 137 09:45 216 851 136 640 352 1491 52 286 50 266 102 55210:00 167 132 299 47 51 98 10:15 186 170 356 39 44 83 10:30 165 175 340 24 26 50 10:45 145 663 128 605 273 1268 44 154 46 167 90 32111:00 174 150 324 28 23 51 11:15 171 154 325 29 23 52 11:30 173 174 347 20 15 35 11:45 189 707 169 647 358 1354 17 94 20 81 37 175
TOTALS 6033 5565 11598 8888 7914 16802
SPLIT %52.0%48.0%40.8%52.9%47.1%59.2%
NB SB EB WB
14,921 13,479 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:30 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1624 1352 2976 1398 1295 2681
Pk Hr Factor 0.904 0.947 0.945 0.955 0.981 0.963
7 - 9 Volume 2933 2418 0 0 5351 2676 2352 0 0 5028
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:30 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1624 1352 0 0 2976 1398 1295 0 0 2681
Pk Hr Factor 0.904 0.947 0.000 0.000 0.945 0.955 0.981 0.000 0.000 0.963
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total28,400
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Melrose Dr Bet. Palomar Airport Rd & Poinsettia Ln
Thursday
5/2/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total28,400
Project #:CA19_4201_014 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/1/2019Melrose Dr Bet. Palomar Airport Rd &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_014 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/2/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Melrose Dr Bet. Palomar Airport Rd &
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 19
Location: Melrose Drive
Between Poinsettia Ln and Rancho Santa Fe Road
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_015
NB SB EB WB
10,340 10,283 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 2 9 11 139 124 263 00:15 3 5 8 107 113 22000:30 7 8 15 124 140 26400:45 6 18 4 26 10 44 143 513 135 512 278 102501:00 4 4 8 139 112 25101:15 5 1 6 128 154 28201:30 3 2 5 209 142 35101:45 1 13 4 11 5 24 177 653 145 553 322 120602:00 1 2 3 178 120 298 02:15 1 1 2 152 223 375 02:30 2 4 6 200 182 382 02:45 4 8 3 10 7 18 164 694 179 704 343 139803:00 2 3 5 180 172 352 03:15 2 3 5 171 223 394 03:30 3 10 13 267 199 466 03:45 10 17 6 22 16 39 191 809 239 833 430 164204:00 6 4 10 232 246 478 04:15 6 5 11 224 246 470 04:30 12 10 22 252 236 488 04:45 12 36 14 33 26 69 236 944 245 973 481 191705:00 17 15 32 226 288 514 05:15 27 29 56 229 294 523 05:30 41 49 90 179 258 437 05:45 64 149 75 168 139 317 197 831 213 1053 410 188406:00 39 67 106 177 186 363 06:15 69 82 151 140 223 363 06:30 79 141 220 140 179 319 06:45 154 341 174 464 328 805 133 590 132 720 265 131007:00 148 188 336 106 168 274 07:15 223 186 409 98 126 224 07:30 287 212 499 96 121 217 07:45 392 1050 224 810 616 1860 76 376 84 499 160 87508:00 353 211 564 69 97 166 08:15 346 198 544 57 103 160 08:30 289 201 490 52 72 124 08:45 205 1193 178 788 383 1981 47 225 73 345 120 57009:00 189 134 323 48 57 105 09:15 157 140 297 32 44 76 09:30 147 109 256 46 44 90 09:45 131 624 112 495 243 1119 26 152 32 177 58 32910:00 109 99 208 20 27 47 10:15 128 124 252 23 34 57 10:30 121 109 230 16 25 41 10:45 124 482 125 457 249 939 24 83 30 116 54 19911:00 116 125 241 12 11 23 11:15 111 117 228 14 12 26 11:30 159 108 267 14 13 27 11:45 103 489 118 468 221 957 10 50 10 46 20 96
TOTALS 4420 3752 8172 5920 6531 12451
SPLIT %54.1%45.9%39.6%47.5%52.5%60.4%
NB SB EB WB
10,340 10,283 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:30 07:30 16:00 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1380 845 2223 944 1085 2006
Pk Hr Factor 0.880 0.943 0.902 0.937 0.923 0.959
7 - 9 Volume 2243 1598 0 0 3841 1775 2026 0 0 3801
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:30 07:30 16:00 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1380 845 0 0 2223 944 1085 0 0 2006
Pk Hr Factor 0.880 0.943 0.000 0.000 0.902 0.937 0.923 0.000 0.000 0.959
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/1/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Melrose Dr Bet. Poinsettia Ln & S Rancho Santa Fe Rd
21:3021:4522:00
Total20,623
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total20,623
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_015
NB SB EB WB
10,379 10,234 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 7 10 17 137 148 285 00:15 9 9 18 116 143 25900:30 4 8 12 134 147 28100:45 2 22 5 32 7 54 137 524 133 571 270 109501:00 2 7 9 149 113 26201:15 2 6 8 117 152 26901:30 1 2 3 135 145 28001:45 1 6 3 18 4 24 129 530 161 571 290 110102:00 2 1 3 136 178 314 02:15 3 4 7 144 148 292 02:30 4 6 10 259 144 403 02:45 3 12 1 12 4 24 207 746 162 632 369 137803:00 2 3 5 214 183 397 03:15 3 3 6 236 279 515 03:30 5 5 10 236 196 432 03:45 7 17 10 21 17 38 207 893 229 887 436 178004:00 4 6 10 206 193 399 04:15 3 9 12 220 244 464 04:30 12 7 19 243 231 474 04:45 12 31 16 38 28 69 198 867 236 904 434 177105:00 16 16 32 236 252 488 05:15 23 25 48 229 289 518 05:30 37 56 93 252 268 520 05:45 52 128 94 191 146 319 233 950 199 1008 432 195806:00 37 70 107 155 199 354 06:15 76 98 174 167 183 350 06:30 77 145 222 146 136 282 06:45 134 324 150 463 284 787 131 599 143 661 274 126007:00 167 194 361 99 120 219 07:15 227 220 447 125 108 233 07:30 278 221 499 93 126 219 07:45 363 1035 179 814 542 1849 71 388 87 441 158 82908:00 371 216 587 83 83 166 08:15 297 228 525 57 77 134 08:30 264 223 487 56 74 130 08:45 212 1144 169 836 381 1980 67 263 70 304 137 56709:00 185 132 317 38 68 106 09:15 130 104 234 61 65 126 09:30 138 107 245 43 52 95 09:45 138 591 87 430 225 1021 25 167 42 227 67 39410:00 121 100 221 29 40 69 10:15 119 123 242 23 37 60 10:30 106 121 227 20 25 45 10:45 102 448 119 463 221 911 30 102 37 139 67 24111:00 136 104 240 15 23 38 11:15 131 117 248 18 14 32 11:30 128 125 253 24 21 45 11:45 130 525 154 500 284 1025 10 67 13 71 23 138
TOTALS 4283 3818 8101 6096 6416 12512
SPLIT %52.9%47.1%39.3%48.7%51.3%60.7%
NB SB EB WB
10,379 10,234 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:45 07:30 17:00 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1309 846 2153 950 1045 1960
Pk Hr Factor 0.882 0.928 0.917 0.942 0.904 0.942
7 - 9 Volume 2179 1650 0 0 3829 1817 1912 0 0 3729
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:45 07:30 17:00 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1309 846 0 0 2153 950 1045 0 0 1960
Pk Hr Factor 0.882 0.928 0.000 0.000 0.917 0.942 0.904 0.000 0.000 0.942
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total20,613
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Melrose Dr Bet. Poinsettia Ln & S Rancho Santa Fe Rd
Thursday
5/2/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total20,613
Project #:CA19_4201_015 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/1/2019Melrose Dr Bet. Poinsettia Ln & S Rancho
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_015 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/2/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Melrose Dr Bet. Poinsettia Ln & S Rancho
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 20
Location: Rancho Santa Fe
Between City Limits and Camino Junipero
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_016
NB SB EB WB
24,514 26,011 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 38 19 57 354 299 653 00:15 32 14 46 322 309 63100:30 24 13 37 322 385 70700:45 21 115 12 58 33 173 356 1354 313 1306 669 266001:00 21 9 30 313 282 59501:15 10 19 29 372 325 69701:30 8 10 18 376 334 71001:45 8 47 10 48 18 95 398 1459 351 1292 749 275102:00 5 5 10 319 347 666 02:15 6 3 9 430 333 763 02:30 5 9 14 397 399 796 02:45 10 26 7 24 17 50 525 1671 355 1434 880 310503:00 11 8 19 582 329 911 03:15 4 19 23 470 379 849 03:30 8 23 31 599 385 984 03:45 8 31 33 83 41 114 594 2245 401 1494 995 373904:00 11 34 45 687 350 1037 04:15 9 48 57 581 374 955 04:30 22 60 82 625 424 1049 04:45 15 57 89 231 104 288 661 2554 418 1566 1079 412005:00 25 97 122 666 442 1108 05:15 38 114 152 638 413 1051 05:30 70 187 257 628 431 1059 05:45 80 213 279 677 359 890 619 2551 387 1673 1006 422406:00 76 348 424 533 366 899 06:15 105 449 554 573 352 925 06:30 171 581 752 453 312 765 06:45 188 540 653 2031 841 2571 408 1967 275 1305 683 327207:00 188 823 1011 315 283 598 07:15 248 736 984 389 272 661 07:30 302 784 1086 342 208 550 07:45 323 1061 740 3083 1063 4144 299 1345 184 947 483 229208:00 324 727 1051 339 180 519 08:15 327 617 944 290 195 485 08:30 342 711 1053 263 155 418 08:45 321 1314 601 2656 922 3970 222 1114 129 659 351 177309:00 284 487 771 250 112 362 09:15 254 497 751 176 100 276 09:30 283 451 734 196 103 299 09:45 293 1114 431 1866 724 2980 157 779 83 398 240 117710:00 283 366 649 154 89 243 10:15 284 363 647 127 58 185 10:30 300 328 628 104 60 164 10:45 276 1143 393 1450 669 2593 59 444 52 259 111 70311:00 283 351 634 79 43 122 11:15 278 365 643 47 21 68 11:30 304 349 653 35 21 56 11:45 307 1172 302 1367 609 2539 37 198 19 104 56 302
TOTALS 6833 13574 20407 17681 12437 30118
SPLIT %33.5%66.5%40.4%58.7%41.3%59.6%
NB SB EB WB
24,514 26,011 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:15 16:45 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1316 3083 4184 2593 1704 4297
Pk Hr Factor 0.962 0.937 0.963 0.973 0.964 0.970
7 - 9 Volume 2375 5739 0 0 8114 5105 3239 0 0 8344
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:15 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1316 3083 0 0 4184 2593 1704 0 0 4297
Pk Hr Factor 0.962 0.937 0.000 0.000 0.963 0.973 0.964 0.000 0.000 0.970
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/1/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Bet. City Limits & Camino Junipero
21:3021:4522:00
Total50,525
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total50,525
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_016
NB SB EB WB
24,472 26,292 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 33 17 50 306 349 655 00:15 35 13 48 324 335 65900:30 28 17 45 348 340 68800:45 19 115 9 56 28 171 352 1330 361 1385 713 271501:00 16 15 31 314 287 60101:15 7 9 16 393 344 73701:30 10 10 20 390 333 72301:45 6 39 5 39 11 78 374 1471 333 1297 707 276802:00 9 10 19 390 344 734 02:15 6 6 12 426 343 769 02:30 7 8 15 444 350 794 02:45 9 31 3 27 12 58 492 1752 378 1415 870 316703:00 6 5 11 580 352 932 03:15 7 14 21 563 390 953 03:30 6 27 33 499 350 849 03:45 5 24 32 78 37 102 544 2186 411 1503 955 368904:00 9 43 52 594 364 958 04:15 8 38 46 643 402 1045 04:30 14 53 67 603 384 987 04:45 16 47 99 233 115 280 597 2437 432 1582 1029 401905:00 20 103 123 650 402 1052 05:15 44 125 169 628 402 1030 05:30 65 189 254 645 445 1090 05:45 65 194 317 734 382 928 585 2508 374 1623 959 413106:00 86 306 392 547 349 896 06:15 93 478 571 555 356 911 06:30 158 636 794 453 310 763 06:45 196 533 662 2082 858 2615 434 1989 296 1311 730 330007:00 209 820 1029 398 283 681 07:15 242 779 1021 342 265 607 07:30 318 819 1137 351 189 540 07:45 326 1095 738 3156 1064 4251 314 1405 209 946 523 235108:00 324 683 1007 328 171 499 08:15 335 632 967 270 201 471 08:30 338 765 1103 246 156 402 08:45 324 1321 640 2720 964 4041 226 1070 168 696 394 176609:00 279 469 748 229 126 355 09:15 287 452 739 210 114 324 09:30 276 428 704 157 114 271 09:45 286 1128 348 1697 634 2825 155 751 96 450 251 120110:00 285 340 625 150 77 227 10:15 300 414 714 128 75 203 10:30 267 377 644 120 52 172 10:45 274 1126 345 1476 619 2602 96 494 63 267 159 76111:00 299 345 644 61 43 104 11:15 277 330 607 60 34 94 11:30 285 305 590 52 40 92 11:45 345 1206 387 1367 732 2573 47 220 35 152 82 372
TOTALS 6859 13665 20524 17613 12627 30240
SPLIT %33.4%66.6%40.4%58.2%41.8%59.6%
NB SB EB WB
24,472 26,292 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:00 16:45 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1323 3156 4251 2520 1681 4201
Pk Hr Factor 0.979 0.962 0.935 0.969 0.944 0.964
7 - 9 Volume 2416 5876 0 0 8292 4945 3205 0 0 8150
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:00 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1323 3156 0 0 4251 2520 1681 0 0 4201
Pk Hr Factor 0.979 0.962 0.000 0.000 0.935 0.969 0.944 0.000 0.000 0.964
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total50,764
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Bet. City Limits & Camino Junipero
Thursday
5/2/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total50,764
Project #:CA19_4201_016 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/1/2019Rancho Santa Fe Rd Bet. City Limits &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_016 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/2/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Bet. City Limits &
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 21
Location: Rancho Santa Fe
Between Camino Junipero and La Costa Avenue
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_017
NB SB EB WB
20,091 21,721 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 30 16 46 297 269 566 00:15 32 12 44 257 280 53700:30 17 12 29 266 332 59800:45 18 97 11 51 29 148 296 1116 263 1144 559 226001:00 16 7 23 297 248 54501:15 7 12 19 282 293 57501:30 10 9 19 330 304 63401:45 5 38 7 35 12 73 349 1258 306 1151 655 240902:00 6 4 10 306 308 614 02:15 7 3 10 322 300 622 02:30 4 5 9 413 324 737 02:45 9 26 6 18 15 44 478 1519 317 1249 795 276803:00 7 7 14 432 291 723 03:15 4 14 18 457 322 779 03:30 7 21 28 425 342 767 03:45 6 24 26 68 32 92 503 1817 329 1284 832 310104:00 14 29 43 503 304 807 04:15 7 35 42 489 329 818 04:30 14 50 64 501 310 811 04:45 12 47 75 189 87 236 480 1973 369 1312 849 328505:00 19 71 90 547 330 877 05:15 31 102 133 481 336 817 05:30 64 164 228 501 352 853 05:45 62 176 225 562 287 738 469 1998 322 1340 791 333806:00 59 288 347 432 281 713 06:15 98 368 466 465 301 766 06:30 140 490 630 334 262 596 06:45 153 450 550 1696 703 2146 309 1540 216 1060 525 260007:00 180 654 834 290 230 520 07:15 196 635 831 304 210 514 07:30 302 629 931 283 150 433 07:45 258 936 596 2514 854 3450 235 1112 173 763 408 187508:00 294 580 874 252 147 399 08:15 313 488 801 229 154 383 08:30 261 596 857 213 131 344 08:45 255 1123 494 2158 749 3281 210 904 107 539 317 144309:00 221 397 618 193 107 300 09:15 209 401 610 156 86 242 09:30 206 377 583 156 89 245 09:45 226 862 357 1532 583 2394 123 628 72 354 195 98210:00 245 316 561 126 75 201 10:15 222 305 527 113 52 165 10:30 250 279 529 88 53 141 10:45 204 921 339 1239 543 2160 56 383 49 229 105 61211:00 250 282 532 61 33 94 11:15 220 304 524 41 19 60 11:30 239 306 545 32 17 49 11:45 274 983 253 1145 527 2128 26 160 20 89 46 249
TOTALS 5683 11207 16890 14408 10514 24922
SPLIT %33.6%66.4%40.4%57.8%42.2%59.6%
NB SB EB WB
20,091 21,721 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:15 16:15 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1167 2514 3490 2017 1387 3396
Pk Hr Factor 0.932 0.961 0.937 0.922 0.940 0.968
7 - 9 Volume 2059 4672 0 0 6731 3971 2652 0 0 6623
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:15 16:15 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1167 2514 0 0 3490 2017 1387 0 0 3396
Pk Hr Factor 0.932 0.961 0.000 0.000 0.937 0.922 0.940 0.000 0.000 0.968
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/1/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Bet. Camino Junipero & La Costa Ave
21:3021:4522:00
Total41,812
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total41,812
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_017
NB SB EB WB
19,826 22,135 0 0
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 25 12 37 254 290 544 00:15 27 11 38 272 294 56600:30 19 13 32 283 301 58400:45 16 87 9 45 25 132 271 1080 311 1196 582 227601:00 13 13 26 271 251 52201:15 9 8 17 304 295 59901:30 10 8 18 332 294 62601:45 5 37 7 36 12 73 292 1199 297 1137 589 233602:00 7 6 13 313 324 637 02:15 6 7 13 346 312 658 02:30 6 8 14 399 311 710 02:45 4 23 2 23 6 46 403 1461 332 1279 735 274003:00 7 4 11 446 288 734 03:15 6 12 18 460 342 802 03:30 5 21 26 433 318 751 03:45 8 26 26 63 34 89 462 1801 385 1333 847 313404:00 8 37 45 462 277 739 04:15 9 30 39 516 364 880 04:30 12 49 61 466 332 798 04:45 12 41 82 198 94 239 513 1957 368 1341 881 329805:00 17 87 104 469 352 821 05:15 37 97 134 461 336 797 05:30 55 160 215 549 392 941 05:45 47 156 250 594 297 750 460 1939 334 1414 794 335306:00 88 258 346 367 285 652 06:15 73 361 434 466 289 755 06:30 139 518 657 354 259 613 06:45 150 450 556 1693 706 2143 347 1534 259 1092 606 262607:00 207 653 860 298 229 527 07:15 184 624 808 282 216 498 07:30 301 687 988 277 159 436 07:45 288 980 581 2545 869 3525 255 1112 185 789 440 190108:00 256 548 804 243 142 385 08:15 291 493 784 238 176 414 08:30 249 597 846 219 146 365 08:45 247 1043 468 2106 715 3149 180 880 151 615 331 149509:00 233 415 648 211 114 325 09:15 203 387 590 171 90 261 09:30 236 333 569 123 102 225 09:45 215 887 288 1423 503 2310 145 650 90 396 235 104610:00 243 294 537 128 64 192 10:15 234 321 555 122 69 191 10:30 206 321 527 103 49 152 10:45 209 892 301 1237 510 2129 89 442 55 237 144 67911:00 260 296 556 63 41 104 11:15 214 299 513 46 34 80 11:30 225 285 510 46 35 81 11:45 252 951 327 1207 579 2158 43 198 26 136 69 334
TOTALS 5573 11170 16743 14253 10965 25218
SPLIT %33.3%66.7%39.9%56.5%43.5%60.1%
NB SB EB WB
19,826 22,135 0 0
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:00 16:45 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1136 2545 3525 1992 1448 3440
Pk Hr Factor 0.944 0.926 0.892 0.907 0.923 0.914
7 - 9 Volume 2023 4651 0 0 6674 3896 2755 0 0 6651
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:00 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 1136 2545 0 0 3525 1992 1448 0 0 3440
Pk Hr Factor 0.944 0.926 0.000 0.000 0.892 0.907 0.923 0.000 0.000 0.914
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total41,961
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Bet. Camino Junipero & La Costa Ave
Thursday
5/2/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total41,961
Project #:CA19_4201_017 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/1/2019Rancho Santa Fe Rd Bet. Camino Junipero &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_017 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/2/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Bet. Camino Junipero &
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
22
Rancho Santa Fe
Between La Costa Avenue and Calle Barcelona
15 Minute Volume Report
Day: Thursday
Date: 3/14/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Bet. La Costa Ave & Camino de los Caches
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA19_ 4085_054
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 28 13 41 12:00 239 290 529
00:15 15 11 26 12:15 298 273 571
00:30 17 13 30 12:30 258 263 521
00:45 13 73 11 48 24 111 12:45 321 1116 314 1140 635 2256
01:00 10 6 16 13:00 266 301 567
01:15 6 6 12 13:15 333 290 623
01:30 11 6 17 13:30 335 278 613
01:45 10 37 7 25 17 62 13:45 387 1321 320 1189 707 2510
02:00 10 3 13 14:00 319 273 592
02:15 6 2 8 14:15 341 338 679
02:30 7 3 10 14:30 406 283 689
02:45 4 27 7 15 11 42 14:45 395 1461 319 1213 714 2674
03:00 13 8 21 15:00 381 303 684
03:15 10 15 25 15:15 sos 327 832
03:30 7 15 22 15:30 536 286 822
03:45 10 40 15 53 25 93 15:45 529 1951 292 1208 821 3159
04:00 10 21 31 16:00 552 280 832
04:15 15 28 43 16:15 593 303 896
04:30 13 41 54 16:30 576 284 860
04:45 24 62 60 150 84 212 16:45 564 2285 299 1166 863 3451
05:00 21 68 89 17:00 655 312 967
05:15 31 66 97 17:15 64.8 301 949
05:30 49 124 173 17:30 540 338 878
05:45 45 146 175 433 220 57.9 17:45 583 2426 284 1235 867 3661
06:00 57 219 276 18:00 597 274 871
06:15 77 296 373 18:15 494 240 734
06:30 120 395 515 18:30 460 233 693
06:45 122 376 473 1383 595 1759 18:45 420 1971 185 932 605 2903
07:00 160 523 683 19:00 403 159 562
07:15 178 563 741 19:15 378 163 541
07:30 265 582 847 19:30 330 153 483
07:45 228 831 504 2172 732 3003 19:45 317 1428 155 630 472 2058
08:00 272 464 736 20:00 274 137 411
08:15 246 518 764 20:15 255 138 393
08:30 237 576 813 20:30 219 109 328
08:45 234 989 505 2063 739 3052 20:45 203 951 109 493 312 1444
09:00 193 382 575 21:00 182 71 253
09:15 226 375 601 21:15 226 91 317
09:30 221 306 527 21:30 191 67 258
09:45 212 852 342 1405 554 2257 21:45 152 751 73 302 225 1053
10:00 194 326 520 22:00 142 38 180
10:15 240 270 510 22:15 119 55 174
10:30 224 293 517 22:30 112 30 142
10:45 236 894 348 1237 584 2131 22:45 66 439 34 157 100 596
11;00 218 229 447 23:00 85 27 112
11:15 232 338 570 23:15 50 27 77
11:30 258 274 532 23:30 37 15 52
11:45 295 1003 314 1155 609 2158 23:45 35 207 28 97 63 304
TOTALS 5330 10139 15469 TOTALS 16307 9762 26069
SPLIT% 34.5% 65.5% 37.2% SPLIT% 62.6% 37.4% 62.8%
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Peak Hour 11:30 07:00 07:30 PM Peak Hour 16:30 16:45 17:00
AM Pk Volume 1090 2172 3079 PM Pk Volume 2443 1250 3661
Pk Hr Factor 0.914 0.933 0.909 Pk Hr Factor 0.932 0.925 0.946
7-9Volume 1820 4235 6055 4 -6Volume 4711 2401 7112
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:30 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:30 16:45 17:00
7 -9 Pk Volume 1011 2172 3079 4 -6 Pk Volume 2443 1250 3661
Pk Hr Factor 0.929 0.933 0.909 Pk Hr Factor 0.932 0.925 0.946
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
23
Rancho Santa Fe
Between Calle Barcelona and Olivenhain Road
15 Minute Volume Report
Day: Thursday
Date: 10/11/2018
Prepared by NDS/ATD
VOLUME
Rancho Santa Fe Rd Bet. Calle Barcelona & Olivenhain Rd
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA18_ 4355_012
I DAILY TOTALS ~
I AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 32 15 47 12:00 261 329 590
00:15 9 12 21 12:15 247 280 527
00:30 15 7 22 12:30 268 310 578
00:45 13 69 8 42 21 111 12:45 266 1042 294 1213 560 2255
01:00 10 4 14 13:00 300 304 604
01:15 6 2 8 13:15 282 244 526
01:30 8 10 18 13:30 328 257 585
01:45 5 29 3 19 8 48 13:45 289 1199 287 1092 576 2291
02:00 5 3 8 14:00 352 297 649
02:15 5 7 12 14:15 372 315 687
02:30 8 9 17 14:30 394 427 821
02:45 10 28 5 24 15 52 14:45 346 1464 524 1563 870 3027
03:00 7 7 14 15:00 358 398 756
03:15 3 12 15 15:15 424 355 779
03:30 7 12 19 15:30 441 348 789
03:45 9 26 25 56 34 82 15:45 445 1668 381 1482 826 3150
04:00 10 19 29 16:00 477 341 818
04:15 13 41 54 16:15 535 302 837
04:30 23 45 68 16:30 544 346 890
04:45 21 67 78 183 99 250 16:45 542 2098 364 1353 906 3451
05:00 15 66 81 17:00 565 351 916
05:15 27 80 107 17:15 522 308 830
05:30 37 135 172 17:30 545 298 843
05:45 70 149 182 463 252 612 17:45 465 2097 313 1270 778 3367
06:00 73 241 314 18:00 425 270 695
06:15 68 323 391 18:15 401 249 650
06:30 120 373 493 18:30 388 225 613
06:45 134 395 399 1336 533 1731 18:45 379 1593 224 968 603 2561
07:00 261 611 872 19:00 304 220 524
07:15 340 608 948 19:15 256 244 500
07:30 310 685 995 19:30 231 158 389
07:45 268 1179 610 2514 878 3693 19:45 176 967 164 786 340 1753
08:00 287 598 885 20:00 217 121 338
08:15 256 531 787 20:15 203 144 347
08:30 207 475 682 20:30 149 125 274-
08:45 259 1009 476 2080 735 3089 20:45 150 719 101 491 251 1210
09:00 195 420 615 21:00 162 101 26'3
09:15 187 347 534 21:15 144 100 244
09:30 219 328 547 21:30 134 86 220
09:45 232 833 336 1431 568 2264 21:45 109 549 71 358 180 907
10:00 221 316 537 22:00 111 49 '160
10:15 203 263 466 22:15 80 52 132
10:30 198 331 529 22:30 63 45 108
10:45 226 848 288 1198 514 2046 22:45 47 301 41 187 88 488
11:00 225 267 492 23:00 63 30 93
11:15 221 277 498 23:15 47 29 76
11:30 244 303 547 23:30 38 26 64
11:45 238 928 256 1103 494 2031 23:45 33 181 24 109 57 290
TOTALS 5560 10449 16009 TOTALS 13878 10872 24750
SPLIT% 34.7% 65.3% 39.3% SPLIT% 56.1% 43.9% 60.7%
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:15 PM Peak Hour 16:15 14:30 16:15
AM Pk Volume 1205 2514 3706 PMPkVolume 2186 1704 35.49
Pk Hr Factor 0.886 0.918 0.931 Pk Hr Factor 0.967 0.813 0.969
7 -9Volume 2188 4594 6782 4-6 Volume 4195 2623 6818
7 -9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07;15 4. 6 Peak Hour 16:15 16:30 16:15
7 • 9 Pk Volume 1205 2514 3706 4 • 6 Pk Volume 2186 1369 3549
Pk Hr Factor 0.886 0.918 -• ·-0.931 Pk Hr Factor 0.967 0.940 I 1! .. 0.969
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 24
Location: Cannon Road
Between Avenida Encinas and Paseo del Norte
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_018
NB SB EB WB
0 0 14,491 14,076
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 9 15 24 248 249 497 00:15 13 11 24 248 204 45200:30 4 7 11 260 225 48500:45 4 30 5 38 9 68 266 1022 212 890 478 191201:00 9 6 15 229 218 44701:15 10 6 16 211 213 42401:30 2 5 7 219 226 44501:45 5 26 3 20 8 46 235 894 235 892 470 178602:00 1 1 2 197 241 438 02:15 6 5 11 207 230 437 02:30 8 2 10 201 264 465 02:45 6 21 3 11 9 32 250 855 262 997 512 185203:00 4 2 6 180 304 484 03:15 6 4 10 221 279 500 03:30 6 5 11 228 391 619 03:45 7 23 13 24 20 47 238 867 313 1287 551 215404:00 10 8 18 249 384 633 04:15 5 13 18 260 355 615 04:30 13 12 25 190 362 552 04:45 44 72 27 60 71 132 268 967 339 1440 607 240705:00 23 27 50 267 462 729 05:15 27 38 65 240 535 775 05:30 54 50 104 226 431 657 05:45 94 198 63 178 157 376 233 966 338 1766 571 273206:00 88 115 203 196 295 491 06:15 120 122 242 166 249 415 06:30 146 173 319 167 233 400 06:45 217 571 175 585 392 1156 155 684 183 960 338 164407:00 230 180 410 115 160 275 07:15 275 165 440 109 133 242 07:30 366 180 546 134 128 262 07:45 457 1328 151 676 608 2004 123 481 118 539 241 102008:00 470 155 625 111 104 215 08:15 351 186 537 107 105 212 08:30 343 150 493 102 93 195 08:45 364 1528 165 656 529 2184 79 399 70 372 149 77109:00 297 164 461 67 104 171 09:15 256 148 404 75 77 152 09:30 250 158 408 83 62 145 09:45 303 1106 177 647 480 1753 69 294 42 285 111 57910:00 219 159 378 52 42 94 10:15 264 171 435 48 37 85 10:30 205 186 391 32 26 58 10:45 270 958 189 705 459 1663 44 176 41 146 85 32211:00 208 189 397 39 32 71 11:15 221 172 393 27 23 50 11:30 227 216 443 26 35 61 11:45 258 914 224 801 482 1715 19 111 11 101 30 212
TOTALS 6775 4401 11176 7716 9675 17391
SPLIT %60.6%39.4%39.1%44.4%55.6%60.9%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 14,491 14,076
AM Peak Hour 07:30 11:45 07:30 12:00 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1644 902 2316 1022 1767 2768
Pk Hr Factor 0.874 0.906 0.926 0.961 0.826 0.893
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2856 1332 4188 0 0 1933 3206 5139
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:30 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1644 676 2316 0 0 1001 1767 2768
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.874 0.939 0.926 0.000 0.000 0.934 0.826 0.893
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Cannon Rd Bet. Avenida Encinas & Paseo Del Norte
21:3021:4522:00
Total28,567
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total28,567
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_018
NB SB EB WB
0 0 14,164 14,018
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 17 26 43 248 234 482 00:15 13 10 23 229 218 44700:30 12 8 20 254 202 45600:45 9 51 9 53 18 104 247 978 218 872 465 185001:00 8 8 16 299 231 53001:15 6 7 13 209 253 46201:30 2 6 8 232 238 47001:45 6 22 4 25 10 47 212 952 232 954 444 190602:00 7 2 9 222 237 459 02:15 4 5 9 220 293 513 02:30 6 4 10 211 258 469 02:45 15 32 2 13 17 45 237 890 287 1075 524 196503:00 2 9 11 242 345 587 03:15 4 2 6 227 292 519 03:30 12 4 16 216 366 582 03:45 10 28 10 25 20 53 267 952 297 1300 564 225204:00 4 11 15 201 360 561 04:15 6 11 17 242 356 598 04:30 16 20 36 225 387 612 04:45 54 80 18 60 72 140 252 920 413 1516 665 243605:00 26 29 55 248 496 744 05:15 32 45 77 243 495 738 05:30 57 48 105 224 383 607 05:45 93 208 65 187 158 395 215 930 308 1682 523 261206:00 67 93 160 225 309 534 06:15 130 144 274 197 227 424 06:30 157 161 318 164 167 331 06:45 234 588 169 567 403 1155 130 716 169 872 299 158807:00 250 185 435 141 153 294 07:15 303 162 465 139 115 254 07:30 348 172 520 100 107 207 07:45 492 1393 127 646 619 2039 92 472 97 472 189 94408:00 408 156 564 76 128 204 08:15 369 200 569 102 93 195 08:30 335 156 491 90 87 177 08:45 366 1478 153 665 519 2143 66 334 94 402 160 73609:00 269 154 423 80 113 193 09:15 242 158 400 69 84 153 09:30 252 156 408 62 65 127 09:45 253 1016 136 604 389 1620 58 269 51 313 109 58210:00 253 171 424 43 28 71 10:15 227 161 388 44 27 71 10:30 216 172 388 35 30 65 10:45 244 940 178 682 422 1622 29 151 29 114 58 26511:00 136 203 339 36 24 60 11:15 137 196 333 21 16 37 11:30 146 224 370 15 15 30 11:45 258 677 231 854 489 1531 15 87 10 65 25 152
TOTALS 6513 4381 10894 7651 9637 17288
SPLIT %59.8%40.2%38.7%44.3%55.7%61.3%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 14,164 14,018
AM Peak Hour 07:30 11:30 07:30 12:15 16:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1617 907 2272 1029 1791 2759
Pk Hr Factor 0.822 0.969 0.918 0.860 0.903 0.927
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2871 1311 4182 0 0 1850 3198 5048
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 08:00 07:30 16:30 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1617 665 2272 0 0 968 1791 2759
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.822 0.831 0.918 0.000 0.000 0.960 0.903 0.927
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total28,182
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Cannon Rd Bet. Avenida Encinas & Paseo Del Norte
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total28,182
Project #:CA19_4201_018 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019Cannon Rd Bet. Avenida Encinas & Paseo
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_018 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Cannon Rd Bet. Avenida Encinas & Paseo
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 25
Location: Cannon Road
Between Paseo del Norte and Car Country
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_019
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,258 11,280
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 6 10 16 165 189 354 00:15 12 11 23 153 141 29400:30 5 5 10 164 166 33000:45 5 28 5 31 10 59 184 666 135 631 319 129701:00 9 4 13 169 159 32801:15 7 7 14 131 133 26401:30 3 2 5 163 170 33301:45 4 23 3 16 7 39 169 632 180 642 349 127402:00 1 1 2 167 158 325 02:15 2 4 6 172 176 348 02:30 4 2 6 160 217 377 02:45 0 7 3 10 3 17 202 701 214 765 416 146603:00 0 2 2 144 239 383 03:15 3 4 7 168 226 394 03:30 7 5 12 195 305 500 03:45 5 15 12 23 17 38 181 688 259 1029 440 171704:00 10 8 18 211 288 499 04:15 3 14 17 224 271 495 04:30 12 12 24 159 289 448 04:45 33 58 28 62 61 120 216 810 271 1119 487 192905:00 22 26 48 219 390 609 05:15 22 39 61 215 470 685 05:30 45 58 103 201 356 557 05:45 69 158 59 182 128 340 201 836 279 1495 480 233106:00 61 112 173 187 226 413 06:15 96 123 219 133 187 320 06:30 111 186 297 130 155 285 06:45 168 436 197 618 365 1054 111 561 129 697 240 125807:00 172 187 359 104 113 217 07:15 187 176 363 100 87 187 07:30 291 192 483 112 92 204 07:45 381 1031 153 708 534 1739 93 409 71 363 164 77208:00 356 167 523 92 50 142 08:15 295 178 473 92 57 149 08:30 272 142 414 86 64 150 08:45 287 1210 159 646 446 1856 77 347 50 221 127 56809:00 235 147 382 61 40 101 09:15 204 121 325 64 37 101 09:30 197 138 335 55 36 91 09:45 198 834 165 571 363 1405 61 241 18 131 79 37210:00 166 132 298 50 21 71 10:15 190 138 328 33 13 46 10:30 155 149 304 24 18 42 10:45 172 683 151 570 323 1253 41 148 31 83 72 23111:00 158 125 283 33 18 51 11:15 163 129 292 24 13 37 11:30 153 169 322 21 23 44 11:45 169 643 180 603 349 1246 15 93 10 64 25 157
TOTALS 5126 4040 9166 6132 7240 13372
SPLIT %55.9%44.1%40.7%45.9%54.1%59.3%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,258 11,280
AM Peak Hour 07:30 06:45 07:30 16:45 17:00 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1323 752 2013 851 1495 2338
Pk Hr Factor 0.868 0.954 0.942 0.971 0.795 0.853
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2241 1354 3595 0 0 1646 2614 4260
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:30 16:45 17:00 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1323 708 2013 0 0 851 1495 2338
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.868 0.922 0.942 0.000 0.000 0.971 0.795 0.853
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Cannon Rd Bet. Paseo Del Norte & Car Country Dr
21:3021:4522:00
Total22,538
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total22,538
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_019
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,259 11,227
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 13 16 29 166 155 321 00:15 15 6 21 173 180 35300:30 9 6 15 174 153 32700:45 7 44 3 31 10 75 163 676 149 637 312 131301:00 7 8 15 194 164 35801:15 4 6 10 172 172 34401:30 2 4 6 176 173 34901:45 4 17 1 19 5 36 166 708 180 689 346 139702:00 7 2 9 171 173 344 02:15 2 5 7 179 209 388 02:30 6 4 10 158 186 344 02:45 6 21 2 13 8 34 212 720 225 793 437 151303:00 2 9 11 199 270 469 03:15 2 2 4 187 214 401 03:30 9 4 13 192 298 490 03:45 2 15 7 22 9 37 197 775 231 1013 428 178804:00 1 10 11 183 287 470 04:15 5 10 15 202 255 457 04:30 15 21 36 204 321 525 04:45 38 59 22 63 60 122 211 800 336 1199 547 199905:00 19 29 48 220 412 632 05:15 25 40 65 209 410 619 05:30 41 49 90 211 330 541 05:45 75 160 63 181 138 341 196 836 238 1390 434 222606:00 54 99 153 183 244 427 06:15 98 143 241 176 153 329 06:30 120 174 294 135 124 259 06:45 171 443 194 610 365 1053 103 597 112 633 215 123007:00 173 189 362 118 102 220 07:15 219 174 393 99 85 184 07:30 276 174 450 90 74 164 07:45 393 1061 138 675 531 1736 84 391 56 317 140 70808:00 322 160 482 66 66 132 08:15 295 197 492 87 48 135 08:30 291 139 430 78 46 124 08:45 291 1199 155 651 446 1850 63 294 54 214 117 50809:00 219 152 371 76 69 145 09:15 187 142 329 69 49 118 09:30 187 131 318 56 37 93 09:45 194 787 123 548 317 1335 50 251 21 176 71 42710:00 186 158 344 35 14 49 10:15 164 135 299 43 14 57 10:30 155 146 301 32 16 48 10:45 167 672 139 578 306 1250 30 140 25 69 55 20911:00 112 151 263 36 20 56 11:15 99 154 253 20 13 33 11:30 122 180 302 13 12 25 11:45 178 511 169 654 347 1165 13 82 7 52 20 134
TOTALS 4989 4045 9034 6270 7182 13452
SPLIT %55.2%44.8%40.2%46.6%53.4%59.8%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,259 11,227
AM Peak Hour 07:45 06:30 07:30 16:45 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1301 731 1955 851 1488 2339
Pk Hr Factor 0.828 0.942 0.920 0.967 0.903 0.925
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2260 1326 3586 0 0 1636 2589 4225
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1301 675 1955 0 0 851 1488 2339
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.828 0.893 0.920 0.000 0.000 0.967 0.903 0.925
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total22,486
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Cannon Rd Bet. Paseo Del Norte & Car Country Dr
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total22,486
Project #:CA19_4201_019 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019Cannon Rd Bet. Paseo Del Norte & Car
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_019 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Cannon Rd Bet. Paseo Del Norte & Car
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 26
Location: Cannon Road
Between Car Country and Legoland Drive
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_020
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,298 11,230
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 9 9 18 166 177 343 00:15 12 12 24 157 139 29600:30 5 5 10 163 161 32400:45 2 28 5 31 7 59 199 685 137 614 336 129901:00 7 4 11 182 156 33801:15 9 4 13 156 136 29201:30 2 2 4 164 177 34101:45 4 22 3 13 7 35 163 665 167 636 330 130102:00 1 1 2 159 152 311 02:15 3 4 7 171 172 343 02:30 4 1 5 162 220 382 02:45 0 8 3 9 3 17 186 678 213 757 399 143503:00 0 2 2 151 248 399 03:15 3 4 7 158 216 374 03:30 5 5 10 204 303 507 03:45 4 12 11 22 15 34 182 695 257 1024 439 171904:00 9 9 18 217 281 498 04:15 2 16 18 217 263 480 04:30 12 13 25 185 283 468 04:45 30 53 29 67 59 120 205 824 272 1099 477 192305:00 21 27 48 253 392 645 05:15 22 39 61 243 447 690 05:30 45 60 105 231 354 585 05:45 58 146 56 182 114 328 207 934 265 1458 472 239206:00 61 119 180 206 220 426 06:15 84 128 212 153 191 344 06:30 109 199 308 156 146 302 06:45 158 412 216 662 374 1074 140 655 115 672 255 132707:00 152 213 365 112 110 222 07:15 178 193 371 117 81 198 07:30 268 213 481 130 88 218 07:45 364 962 162 781 526 1743 100 459 67 346 167 80508:00 338 172 510 107 45 152 08:15 282 183 465 100 56 156 08:30 249 150 399 94 59 153 08:45 280 1149 175 680 455 1829 87 388 39 199 126 58709:00 214 144 358 79 40 119 09:15 180 127 307 76 34 110 09:30 177 146 323 58 26 84 09:45 156 727 153 570 309 1297 66 279 20 120 86 39910:00 166 124 290 51 20 71 10:15 176 135 311 38 13 51 10:30 132 145 277 26 19 45 10:45 158 632 140 544 298 1176 38 153 31 83 69 23611:00 156 127 283 30 15 45 11:15 162 135 297 23 16 39 11:30 154 157 311 25 24 49 11:45 167 639 177 596 344 1235 15 93 10 65 25 158
TOTALS 4790 4157 8947 6508 7073 13581
SPLIT %53.5%46.5%39.7%47.9%52.1%60.3%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,298 11,230
AM Peak Hour 07:30 06:45 07:30 17:00 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1252 835 1982 934 1465 2397
Pk Hr Factor 0.860 0.966 0.942 0.923 0.819 0.868
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2111 1461 3572 0 0 1758 2557 4315
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:30 17:00 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1252 781 1982 0 0 934 1465 2397
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.860 0.917 0.942 0.000 0.000 0.923 0.819 0.868
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total22,528
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
Cannon Rd Bet. Car Country Dr & Legoland Dr
21:3021:4522:00
Total22,528
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_020
NB SB EB WB
0 0 10,215 11,171
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 16 15 31 172 162 334 00:15 20 6 26 165 167 33200:30 9 6 15 191 146 33700:45 7 52 2 29 9 81 175 703 151 626 326 132901:00 6 8 14 186 154 34001:15 4 6 10 181 172 35301:30 2 4 6 164 171 33501:45 4 16 1 19 5 35 192 723 181 678 373 140102:00 7 2 9 174 173 347 02:15 2 5 7 171 178 349 02:30 4 3 7 162 189 351 02:45 5 18 2 12 7 30 210 717 218 758 428 147503:00 3 6 9 221 264 485 03:15 2 2 4 194 203 397 03:30 7 4 11 176 294 470 03:45 4 16 7 19 11 35 204 795 226 987 430 178204:00 1 9 10 201 291 492 04:15 5 11 16 224 236 460 04:30 10 20 30 221 328 549 04:45 37 53 23 63 60 116 225 871 320 1175 545 204605:00 19 29 48 266 414 680 05:15 24 40 64 237 396 633 05:30 41 51 92 235 322 557 05:45 72 156 66 186 138 342 118 856 247 1379 365 223506:00 49 99 148 106 225 331 06:15 86 156 242 92 146 238 06:30 112 178 290 68 111 179 06:45 151 398 225 658 376 1056 50 316 108 590 158 90607:00 156 207 363 58 87 145 07:15 200 188 388 53 81 134 07:30 254 186 440 46 70 116 07:45 379 989 158 739 537 1728 39 196 55 293 94 48908:00 297 157 454 35 63 98 08:15 285 205 490 38 42 80 08:30 286 142 428 39 42 81 08:45 267 1135 170 674 437 1809 26 138 41 188 67 32609:00 211 164 375 35 66 101 09:15 165 141 306 27 49 76 09:30 198 127 325 20 33 53 09:45 168 742 124 556 292 1298 23 105 18 166 41 27110:00 172 166 338 21 11 32 10:15 149 148 297 22 17 39 10:30 149 139 288 10 15 25 10:45 143 613 145 598 288 1211 12 65 22 65 34 13011:00 113 158 271 19 19 38 11:15 83 147 230 8 10 18 11:30 133 178 311 3 12 15 11:45 181 510 180 663 361 1173 2 32 9 50 11 82
TOTALS 4698 4216 8914 5517 6955 12472
SPLIT %52.7%47.3%41.7%44.2%55.8%58.3%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 10,215 11,171
AM Peak Hour 07:45 06:45 07:30 16:45 16:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1247 806 1921 963 1458 2415
Pk Hr Factor 0.823 0.896 0.894 0.905 0.880 0.888
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2124 1413 3537 0 0 1727 2554 4281
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:45 16:30 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1247 739 1921 0 0 963 1458 2415
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.823 0.893 0.894 0.000 0.000 0.905 0.880 0.888
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Cannon Rd Bet. Car Country Dr & Legoland Dr
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total21,386
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total21,386
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_020 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019Cannon Rd Bet. Car Country Dr & Legoland
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_020 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Cannon Rd Bet. Car Country Dr & Legoland
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 27
Location: Cannon Road
Between Legoland Drive and Faraday Ave
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_021
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,057 10,641
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 12 4 16 112 149 261 00:15 11 6 17 145 133 27800:30 5 5 10 143 149 29200:45 2 30 4 19 6 49 166 566 139 570 305 113601:00 8 3 11 152 127 27901:15 9 2 11 138 141 27901:30 3 2 5 152 153 30501:45 3 23 2 9 5 32 146 588 161 582 307 117002:00 1 1 2 161 132 293 02:15 4 3 7 176 154 330 02:30 4 0 4 190 172 362 02:45 0 9 2 6 2 15 184 711 207 665 391 137603:00 0 2 2 210 189 399 03:15 3 3 6 192 181 373 03:30 4 7 11 283 186 469 03:45 4 11 13 25 17 36 209 894 186 742 395 163604:00 6 10 16 292 219 511 04:15 2 19 21 279 196 475 04:30 11 17 28 279 201 480 04:45 24 43 45 91 69 134 280 1130 215 831 495 196105:00 20 29 49 316 292 608 05:15 16 50 66 298 340 638 05:30 32 74 106 336 228 564 05:45 49 117 81 234 130 351 242 1192 204 1064 446 225606:00 46 136 182 266 180 446 06:15 47 162 209 194 149 343 06:30 77 264 341 191 112 303 06:45 107 277 336 898 443 1175 160 811 97 538 257 134907:00 148 255 403 155 80 235 07:15 125 279 404 133 73 206 07:30 192 302 494 131 80 211 07:45 263 728 309 1145 572 1873 119 538 62 295 181 83308:00 255 234 489 128 36 164 08:15 203 206 409 118 42 160 08:30 216 193 409 98 47 145 08:45 201 875 188 821 389 1696 89 433 31 156 120 58909:00 163 169 332 105 30 135 09:15 118 138 256 89 31 120 09:30 116 156 272 58 19 77 09:45 104 501 163 626 267 1127 71 323 25 105 96 42810:00 118 125 243 62 20 82 10:15 100 133 233 41 13 54 10:30 110 136 246 32 19 51 10:45 128 456 146 540 274 996 44 179 14 66 58 24511:00 112 124 236 36 12 48 11:15 124 149 273 27 13 40 11:30 123 141 264 35 13 48 11:45 150 509 156 570 306 1079 15 113 5 43 20 156
TOTALS 3579 4984 8563 7478 5657 13135
SPLIT %41.8%58.2%39.5%56.9%43.1%60.5%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,057 10,641
AM Peak Hour 07:45 06:45 07:30 16:45 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 937 1172 1964 1230 1075 2305
Pk Hr Factor 0.891 0.872 0.858 0.915 0.790 0.903
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 1603 1966 3569 0 0 2322 1895 4217
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 937 1145 1964 0 0 1230 1075 2305
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.891 0.926 0.858 0.000 0.000 0.915 0.790 0.903
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Cannon Rd Bet. Legoland Dr & Faraday Ave
21:3021:4522:00
Total21,698
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total21,698
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_021
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,304 10,681
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 19 11 30 145 149 294 00:15 15 5 20 125 161 28600:30 9 5 14 150 151 30100:45 7 50 10 31 17 81 141 561 155 616 296 117701:00 7 3 10 162 132 29401:15 3 4 7 159 161 32001:30 4 2 6 135 177 31201:45 3 17 0 9 3 26 169 625 167 637 336 126202:00 4 0 4 175 155 330 02:15 2 3 5 153 132 285 02:30 2 3 5 154 166 320 02:45 3 11 2 8 5 19 209 691 221 674 430 136503:00 3 5 8 249 179 428 03:15 4 3 7 203 193 396 03:30 6 5 11 238 171 409 03:45 6 19 14 27 20 46 225 915 180 723 405 163804:00 1 12 13 256 224 480 04:15 4 8 12 263 190 453 04:30 8 23 31 298 236 534 04:45 18 31 31 74 49 105 294 1111 256 906 550 201705:00 17 32 49 355 303 658 05:15 20 44 64 317 301 618 05:30 27 64 91 337 231 568 05:45 49 113 88 228 137 341 280 1289 186 1021 466 231006:00 37 117 154 270 172 442 06:15 56 190 246 240 132 372 06:30 74 258 332 190 95 285 06:45 100 267 312 877 412 1144 135 835 94 493 229 132807:00 110 267 377 166 75 241 07:15 154 241 395 128 63 191 07:30 206 262 468 123 59 182 07:45 291 761 260 1030 551 1791 115 532 45 242 160 77408:00 272 228 500 111 59 170 08:15 254 256 510 110 42 152 08:30 227 173 400 104 36 140 08:45 209 962 199 856 408 1818 94 419 36 173 130 59209:00 178 170 348 94 69 163 09:15 139 162 301 84 49 133 09:30 147 136 283 62 25 87 09:45 126 590 146 614 272 1204 78 318 15 158 93 47610:00 108 169 277 49 11 60 10:15 104 143 247 49 12 61 10:30 99 125 224 48 11 59 10:45 124 435 134 571 258 1006 54 200 18 52 72 25211:00 94 158 252 42 13 55 11:15 77 137 214 30 11 41 11:30 120 174 294 18 8 26 11:45 154 445 154 623 308 1068 17 107 6 38 23 145
TOTALS 3701 4948 8649 7603 5733 13336
SPLIT %42.8%57.2%39.3%57.0%43.0%60.7%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,304 10,681
AM Peak Hour 07:45 06:45 07:30 16:45 16:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1044 1082 2029 1303 1096 2394
Pk Hr Factor 0.897 0.867 0.921 0.918 0.904 0.910
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 1723 1886 3609 0 0 2400 1927 4327
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:00 07:30 16:45 16:30 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1044 1030 2029 0 0 1303 1096 2394
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.897 0.964 0.921 0.000 0.000 0.918 0.904 0.910
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total21,985
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Cannon Rd Bet. Legoland Dr & Faraday Ave
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total21,985
Project #:CA19_4201_021 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019Cannon Rd Bet. Legoland Dr & Faraday Ave
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_021 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Cannon Rd Bet. Legoland Dr & Faraday Ave
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 28
Location: Cannon Road
Between Faraday Ave and El Camino Real
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_022
NB SB EB WB
0 0 7,652 8,353
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 14 4 18 97 105 202 00:15 12 4 16 96 121 21700:30 8 4 12 102 104 20600:45 8 42 6 18 14 60 77 372 120 450 197 82201:00 6 1 7 112 98 21001:15 2 3 5 97 121 21801:30 4 0 4 88 166 25401:45 3 15 1 5 4 20 104 401 113 498 217 89902:00 4 0 4 128 92 220 02:15 4 2 6 100 115 215 02:30 1 2 3 136 126 262 02:45 2 11 4 8 6 19 135 499 177 510 312 100903:00 2 3 5 211 113 324 03:15 2 3 5 152 125 277 03:30 2 3 5 222 88 310 03:45 4 10 13 22 17 32 189 774 113 439 302 121304:00 0 10 10 216 108 324 04:15 2 7 9 211 107 318 04:30 3 27 30 254 114 368 04:45 8 13 27 71 35 84 235 916 121 450 356 136605:00 6 35 41 321 130 451 05:15 6 37 43 266 101 367 05:30 7 56 63 323 95 418 05:45 15 34 84 212 99 246 238 1148 91 417 329 156506:00 14 106 120 231 100 331 06:15 22 198 220 184 92 276 06:30 39 273 312 141 71 212 06:45 38 113 329 906 367 1019 96 652 48 311 144 96307:00 57 248 305 124 48 172 07:15 51 237 288 89 54 143 07:30 73 262 335 98 54 152 07:45 116 297 308 1055 424 1352 85 396 37 193 122 58908:00 129 267 396 88 41 129 08:15 77 275 352 76 41 117 08:30 71 199 270 75 36 111 08:45 64 341 189 930 253 1271 69 308 47 165 116 47309:00 80 158 238 61 74 135 09:15 57 144 201 67 49 116 09:30 71 119 190 41 32 73 09:45 68 276 135 556 203 832 61 230 17 172 78 40210:00 68 133 201 38 16 54 10:15 57 114 171 32 16 48 10:30 63 100 163 31 9 40 10:45 73 261 119 466 192 727 28 129 16 57 44 18611:00 82 110 192 26 13 39 11:15 63 109 172 19 7 26 11:30 92 101 193 13 6 19 11:45 107 344 91 411 198 755 12 70 5 31 17 101
TOTALS 1757 4660 6417 5895 3693 9588
SPLIT %27.4%72.6%40.1%61.5%38.5%59.9%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 7,652 8,353
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:30 07:30 17:00 14:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 402 1112 1507 1148 541 1592
Pk Hr Factor 0.939 0.903 0.889 0.889 0.764 0.882
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 638 1985 2623 0 0 2064 867 2931
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 17:00 16:15 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 395 1112 1507 0 0 1148 472 1592
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.766 0.903 0.889 0.000 0.000 0.889 0.908 0.882
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/8/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Cannon Rd Bet. Faraday Ave & El Camino Real
21:3021:4522:00
Total16,005
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total16,005
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_022
NB SB EB WB
0 0 7,375 8,099
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 10 5 15 98 92 190 00:15 11 4 15 98 89 18700:30 4 7 11 94 104 19800:45 6 31 5 21 11 52 83 373 112 397 195 77001:00 5 2 7 115 107 22201:15 6 1 7 101 116 21701:30 2 0 2 99 145 24401:45 4 17 0 3 4 20 111 426 119 487 230 91302:00 3 1 4 116 102 218 02:15 2 5 7 134 91 225 02:30 4 2 6 131 138 269 02:45 1 10 3 11 4 21 124 505 130 461 254 96603:00 2 3 5 168 111 279 03:15 2 5 7 167 113 280 03:30 1 4 5 177 88 265 03:45 3 8 12 24 15 32 183 695 105 417 288 111204:00 4 8 12 221 79 300 04:15 3 5 8 199 109 308 04:30 2 24 26 271 114 385 04:45 7 16 41 78 48 94 227 918 113 415 340 133305:00 4 30 34 290 108 398 05:15 8 43 51 304 123 427 05:30 11 73 84 266 76 342 05:45 9 32 77 223 86 255 217 1077 80 387 297 146406:00 14 136 150 204 79 283 06:15 27 163 190 142 75 217 06:30 30 277 307 149 59 208 06:45 52 123 311 887 363 1010 111 606 53 266 164 87207:00 117 291 408 110 51 161 07:15 59 300 359 84 53 137 07:30 73 314 387 84 44 128 07:45 67 316 329 1234 396 1550 82 360 48 196 130 55608:00 73 250 323 94 34 128 08:15 68 195 263 96 40 136 08:30 82 232 314 69 26 95 08:45 61 284 205 882 266 1166 52 311 29 129 81 44009:00 61 147 208 61 27 88 09:15 50 151 201 74 29 103 09:30 63 141 204 52 26 78 09:45 54 228 129 568 183 796 44 231 21 103 65 33410:00 70 116 186 37 14 51 10:15 75 97 172 29 16 45 10:30 78 121 199 24 11 35 10:45 72 295 85 419 157 714 31 121 6 47 37 16811:00 73 85 158 20 17 37 11:15 69 118 187 13 11 24 11:30 91 107 198 23 6 29 11:45 85 318 93 403 178 721 18 74 7 41 25 115
TOTALS 1678 4753 6431 5697 3346 9043
SPLIT %26.1%73.9%41.6%63.0%37.0%58.4%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 7,375 8,099
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:00 07:00 16:30 14:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 375 1234 1550 1092 492 1550
Pk Hr Factor 0.957 0.938 0.950 0.898 0.891 0.907
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 600 2116 2716 0 0 1995 802 2797
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 07:00 16:30 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 316 1234 1550 0 0 1092 458 1550
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.675 0.938 0.950 0.000 0.000 0.898 0.931 0.907
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total15,474
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Cannon Rd Bet. Faraday Ave & El Camino Real
Thursday
5/9/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total15,474
Project #:CA19_4201_022 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019Cannon Rd Bet. Faraday Ave & El Camino
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_022 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/9/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Cannon Rd Bet. Faraday Ave & El Camino
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 29
Location: Cannon Road
Between El Camino Real and College Boulevard
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_023
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,873 12,015
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 0 0 28 5 33 0 0 173 129 302 00:15 0 0 14 5 19 0 0 147 120 26700:30 0 0 6 10 16 0 0 136 159 29500:45 0 0 5 53 2 22 7 75 0 0 152 608 161 569 313 117701:00 0 0 10 4 14 0 0 122 160 28201:15 0 0 6 1 7 0 0 148 267 41501:30 0 0 10 1 11 0 0 146 201 34701:45 0 0 6 32 3 9 9 41 0 0 159 575 150 778 309 135302:00 0 0 6 3 9 0 0 172 149 321 02:15 0 0 2 4 6 0 0 211 145 356 02:30 0 0 5 6 11 0 0 302 228 530 02:45 0 0 5 18 7 20 12 38 0 0 286 971 311 833 597 180403:00 0 0 2 4 6 0 0 248 205 453 03:15 0 0 6 5 11 0 0 241 245 486 03:30 0 0 4 11 15 0 0 285 185 470 03:45 0 0 4 16 20 40 24 56 0 0 306 1080 196 831 502 191104:00 0 0 7 26 33 0 0 356 136 492 04:15 0 0 4 36 40 0 0 399 128 527 04:30 0 0 5 49 54 0 0 389 166 555 04:45 0 0 7 23 78 189 85 212 0 0 395 1539 137 567 532 210605:00 0 0 11 56 67 0 0 426 141 567 05:15 0 0 11 91 102 0 0 432 154 586 05:30 0 0 12 141 153 0 0 444 116 560 05:45 0 0 21 55 219 507 240 562 0 0 371 1673 131 542 502 221506:00 0 0 37 172 209 0 0 306 105 411 06:15 0 0 34 248 282 0 0 227 102 329 06:30 0 0 51 327 378 0 0 200 92 292 06:45 0 0 154 276 403 1150 557 1426 0 0 192 925 93 392 285 131707:00 0 0 324 359 683 0 0 172 68 240 07:15 0 0 164 472 636 0 0 167 57 224 07:30 0 0 86 442 528 0 0 138 72 210 07:45 0 0 133 707 385 1658 518 2365 0 0 133 610 71 268 204 87808:00 0 0 93 346 439 0 0 103 51 154 08:15 0 0 100 319 419 0 0 113 81 194 08:30 0 0 119 260 379 0 0 110 63 173 08:45 0 0 113 425 294 1219 407 1644 0 0 82 408 32 227 114 63509:00 0 0 96 232 328 0 0 75 38 113 09:15 0 0 77 214 291 0 0 90 48 138 09:30 0 0 102 214 316 0 0 67 34 101 09:45 0 0 90 365 175 835 265 1200 0 0 64 296 40 160 104 45610:00 0 0 97 128 225 0 0 63 28 91 10:15 0 0 88 135 223 0 0 47 14 61 10:30 0 0 112 136 248 0 0 40 17 57 10:45 0 0 98 395 135 534 233 929 0 0 45 195 14 73 59 26811:00 0 0 115 129 244 0 0 47 23 70 11:15 0 0 112 129 241 0 0 33 14 47 11:30 0 0 117 148 265 0 0 33 10 43 11:45 0 0 144 488 132 538 276 1026 0 0 27 140 7 54 34 194
TOTALS 2853 6721 9574 9020 5294 14314
SPLIT %29.8%70.2%40.1%63.0%37.0%59.9%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 11,873 12,015
AM Peak Hour 06:45 06:45 06:45 16:45 14:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 728 1676 2404 1697 989 2245
Pk Hr Factor 0.562 0.888 0.880 0.956 0.795 0.958
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 1132 2877 4009 0 0 3212 1109 4321
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 07:00 16:45 16:30 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 707 1658 2365 0 0 1697 598 2245
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.546 0.878 0.866 0.000 0.000 0.956 0.901 0.958
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Cannon Rd Bet. El Camino Real & College Blvd
21:3021:4522:00
Total23,888
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total23,888
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_023
NB SB EB WB
0 0 12,449 12,228
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 0 0 24 7 31 0 0 182 159 341 00:15 0 0 9 7 16 0 0 134 163 29700:30 0 0 9 4 13 0 0 143 155 29800:45 0 0 8 50 2 20 10 70 0 0 124 583 141 618 265 120101:00 0 0 7 7 14 0 0 162 162 32401:15 0 0 6 4 10 0 0 163 158 32101:30 0 0 9 2 11 0 0 157 264 42101:45 0 0 5 27 0 13 5 40 0 0 184 666 185 769 369 143502:00 0 0 4 2 6 0 0 218 147 365 02:15 0 0 5 5 10 0 0 204 156 360 02:30 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 299 241 540 02:45 0 0 1 10 11 20 12 30 0 0 342 1063 254 798 596 186103:00 0 0 5 5 10 0 0 259 182 441 03:15 0 0 3 5 8 0 0 308 179 487 03:30 0 0 6 9 15 0 0 316 151 467 03:45 0 0 4 18 22 41 26 59 0 0 336 1219 183 695 519 191404:00 0 0 4 19 23 0 0 360 153 513 04:15 0 0 4 36 40 0 0 400 164 564 04:30 0 0 10 53 63 0 0 405 157 562 04:45 0 0 8 26 77 185 85 211 0 0 396 1561 182 656 578 221705:00 0 0 12 66 78 0 0 424 138 562 05:15 0 0 8 75 83 0 0 465 143 608 05:30 0 0 15 155 170 0 0 427 136 563 05:45 0 0 15 50 235 531 250 581 0 0 368 1684 138 555 506 223906:00 0 0 28 161 189 0 0 323 149 472 06:15 0 0 41 244 285 0 0 303 120 423 06:30 0 0 60 322 382 0 0 237 116 353 06:45 0 0 77 206 374 1101 451 1307 0 0 186 1049 80 465 266 151407:00 0 0 95 370 465 0 0 185 71 256 07:15 0 0 74 346 420 0 0 149 67 216 07:30 0 0 95 356 451 0 0 132 73 205 07:45 0 0 196 460 386 1458 582 1918 0 0 115 581 64 275 179 85608:00 0 0 342 351 693 0 0 116 63 179 08:15 0 0 178 411 589 0 0 106 78 184 08:30 0 0 97 330 427 0 0 122 82 204 08:45 0 0 97 714 295 1387 392 2101 0 0 94 438 70 293 164 73109:00 0 0 119 223 342 0 0 102 117 219 09:15 0 0 122 215 337 0 0 88 63 151 09:30 0 0 106 186 292 0 0 50 44 94 09:45 0 0 83 430 201 825 284 1255 0 0 73 313 36 260 109 57310:00 0 0 98 174 272 0 0 62 17 79 10:15 0 0 107 144 251 0 0 44 17 61 10:30 0 0 89 135 224 0 0 59 25 84 10:45 0 0 122 416 146 599 268 1015 0 0 40 205 26 85 66 29011:00 0 0 124 141 265 0 0 51 16 67 11:15 0 0 133 120 253 0 0 25 11 36 11:30 0 0 132 125 257 0 0 31 7 38 11:45 0 0 156 545 150 536 306 1081 0 0 28 135 9 43 37 178
TOTALS 2952 6716 9668 9497 5512 15009
SPLIT %30.5%69.5%39.2%63.3%36.7%60.8%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 12,449 12,228
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:30 07:30 16:45 14:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 813 1504 2315 1712 856 2311
Pk Hr Factor 0.594 0.915 0.835 0.920 0.843 0.950
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 1174 2845 4019 0 0 3245 1211 4456
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:30 07:30 16:45 16:00 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 813 1504 2315 0 0 1712 656 2311
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.594 0.915 0.835 0.000 0.000 0.920 0.901 0.950
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total24,677
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Cannon Rd Bet. El Camino Real & College Blvd
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total24,677
Project #:CA19_4201_023 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019Cannon Rd Bet. El Camino Real & College
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_023 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Cannon Rd Bet. El Camino Real & College
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 30
Location: Palomar Airport Road
Between Carlsbad Blvd and Avenida Encinas
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_026
NB SB EB WB
0 0 2,513 4,362
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 0 3 3 47 79 126 00:15 0 2 2 58 68 12600:30 0 2 2 41 76 11700:45 1 1 2 9 3 10 38 184 74 297 112 48101:00 2 3 5 39 79 11801:15 0 0 0 48 66 11401:30 3 1 4 55 78 13301:45 2 7 4 8 6 15 50 192 85 308 135 50002:00 1 1 2 33 65 98 02:15 0 1 1 44 79 123 02:30 1 2 3 46 71 117 02:45 0 2 1 5 1 7 31 154 88 303 119 45703:00 3 0 3 40 79 119 03:15 0 2 2 48 74 122 03:30 0 0 0 40 86 126 03:45 3 6 0 2 3 8 58 186 84 323 142 50904:00 1 0 1 40 115 155 04:15 2 0 2 50 110 160 04:30 1 2 3 36 122 158 04:45 6 10 3 5 9 15 40 166 87 434 127 60005:00 1 7 8 24 116 140 05:15 5 10 15 37 113 150 05:30 11 13 24 36 107 143 05:45 20 37 12 42 32 79 37 134 148 484 185 61806:00 20 21 41 38 94 132 06:15 32 17 49 34 89 123 06:30 53 37 90 30 81 111 06:45 52 157 59 134 111 291 41 143 64 328 105 47107:00 47 75 122 29 51 80 07:15 61 80 141 22 51 73 07:30 65 63 128 20 44 64 07:45 48 221 63 281 111 502 27 98 35 181 62 27908:00 55 53 108 17 33 50 08:15 44 68 112 22 47 69 08:30 47 42 89 16 21 37 08:45 52 198 45 208 97 406 19 74 17 118 36 19209:00 36 56 92 14 19 33 09:15 40 49 89 8 23 31 09:30 36 46 82 14 16 30 09:45 35 147 48 199 83 346 9 45 17 75 26 12010:00 42 66 108 7 18 25 10:15 33 44 77 7 14 21 10:30 40 64 104 3 11 14 10:45 32 147 58 232 90 379 6 23 7 50 13 7311:00 38 85 123 5 9 14 11:15 39 76 115 8 5 13 11:30 39 75 114 5 6 11 11:45 45 161 74 310 119 471 2 20 6 26 8 46
TOTALS 1094 1435 2529 1419 2927 4346
SPLIT %43.3%56.7%36.8%32.7%67.3%63.2%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 2,513 4,362
AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:00 06:45 13:00 17:00 17:00
AM Pk Volume 229 310 502 192 484 618
Pk Hr Factor 0.881 0.912 0.890 0.873 0.818 0.835
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 419 489 908 0 0 300 918 1218
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:00 17:00 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 229 281 502 0 0 166 484 618
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.881 0.878 0.890 0.000 0.000 0.830 0.818 0.835
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total6,875
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Carlsbad Blvd & Avenida Encinas
21:3021:4522:00
Total6,875
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/8/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_026
NB SB EB WB
0 0 2,331 4,546
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 2 4 6 33 65 98 00:15 3 2 5 45 74 11900:30 3 8 11 46 68 11400:45 1 9 1 15 2 24 36 160 78 285 114 44501:00 0 2 2 38 61 9901:15 3 1 4 39 76 11501:30 1 2 3 41 75 11601:45 3 7 1 6 4 13 34 152 72 284 106 43602:00 3 0 3 43 62 105 02:15 2 3 5 25 56 81 02:30 1 1 2 28 81 109 02:45 0 6 0 4 0 10 34 130 84 283 118 41303:00 1 2 3 50 86 136 03:15 0 0 0 44 79 123 03:30 0 0 0 47 81 128 03:45 2 3 0 2 2 5 38 179 86 332 124 51104:00 1 1 2 32 80 112 04:15 0 3 3 30 109 139 04:30 2 1 3 32 108 140 04:45 6 9 1 6 7 15 43 137 84 381 127 51805:00 3 7 10 27 122 149 05:15 1 3 4 49 117 166 05:30 10 8 18 37 117 154 05:45 9 23 11 29 20 52 31 144 123 479 154 62306:00 19 11 30 46 104 150 06:15 20 17 37 39 99 138 06:30 31 35 66 45 86 131 06:45 58 128 59 122 117 250 30 160 64 353 94 51307:00 55 76 131 24 77 101 07:15 46 139 185 37 43 80 07:30 59 129 188 26 57 83 07:45 51 211 70 414 121 625 22 109 48 225 70 33408:00 41 74 115 28 31 59 08:15 35 85 120 23 39 62 08:30 54 83 137 23 26 49 08:45 28 158 64 306 92 464 14 88 22 118 36 20609:00 28 49 77 27 19 46 09:15 26 62 88 19 13 32 09:30 36 55 91 13 18 31 09:45 32 122 52 218 84 340 14 73 12 62 26 13510:00 37 62 99 5 25 30 10:15 41 55 96 9 13 22 10:30 35 71 106 4 12 16 10:45 29 142 51 239 80 381 8 26 13 63 21 8911:00 39 65 104 5 7 12 11:15 29 90 119 3 10 13 11:30 39 68 107 4 3 7 11:45 33 140 72 295 105 435 3 15 5 25 8 40
TOTALS 958 1656 2614 1373 2890 4263
SPLIT %36.6%63.4%38.0%32.2%67.8%62.0%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 2,331 4,546
AM Peak Hour 06:45 07:00 07:00 15:00 17:00 17:15
AM Pk Volume 218 414 625 179 479 624
Pk Hr Factor 0.924 0.745 0.831 0.895 0.974 0.940
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 369 720 1089 0 0 281 860 1141
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:00 07:00 16:45 17:00 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 211 414 625 0 0 156 479 623
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.894 0.745 0.831 0.000 0.000 0.796 0.974 0.938
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Carlsbad Blvd & Avenida Encinas
Thursday
5/9/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total6,877
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total6,877
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_026 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Carlsbad Blvd &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_026 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/9/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Carlsbad Blvd &
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 31
Location: Palomar Airport Road
Between Avenida Encinas and Paso del Norte
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_027
NB SB EB WB
0 0 13,713 12,222
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 16 16 32 325 218 543 00:15 25 16 41 294 187 48100:30 20 9 29 268 196 46400:45 13 74 17 58 30 132 250 1137 228 829 478 196601:00 23 5 28 238 197 43501:15 7 3 10 281 161 44201:30 13 16 29 244 186 43001:45 10 53 6 30 16 83 244 1007 207 751 451 175802:00 15 6 21 234 174 408 02:15 6 5 11 238 176 414 02:30 6 12 18 250 184 434 02:45 2 29 4 27 6 56 214 936 199 733 413 166903:00 7 5 12 233 186 419 03:15 2 4 6 207 194 401 03:30 6 6 12 261 217 478 03:45 10 25 7 22 17 47 228 929 204 801 432 173004:00 7 4 11 299 199 498 04:15 10 5 15 257 216 473 04:30 15 17 32 327 190 517 04:45 19 51 28 54 47 105 285 1168 217 822 502 199005:00 25 48 73 373 201 574 05:15 19 39 58 319 246 565 05:30 37 74 111 299 207 506 05:45 53 134 99 260 152 394 268 1259 284 938 552 219706:00 57 92 149 260 166 426 06:15 94 115 209 201 173 374 06:30 98 127 225 216 163 379 06:45 142 391 187 521 329 912 221 898 159 661 380 155907:00 156 218 374 198 111 309 07:15 156 257 413 148 92 240 07:30 180 243 423 134 100 234 07:45 163 655 243 961 406 1616 142 622 106 409 248 103108:00 161 200 361 180 95 275 08:15 135 269 404 149 98 247 08:30 169 221 390 143 64 207 08:45 191 656 250 940 441 1596 103 575 75 332 178 90709:00 160 214 374 122 69 191 09:15 161 188 349 71 63 134 09:30 202 204 406 89 56 145 09:45 194 717 205 811 399 1528 67 349 64 252 131 60110:00 191 169 360 52 38 90 10:15 159 178 337 56 45 101 10:30 218 194 412 53 37 90 10:45 186 754 201 742 387 1496 51 212 29 149 80 36111:00 223 220 443 33 37 70 11:15 236 303 539 42 20 62 11:30 230 306 536 24 25 49 11:45 268 957 195 1024 463 1981 26 125 13 95 39 220
TOTALS 4496 5450 9946 9217 6772 15989
SPLIT %45.2%54.8%38.3%57.6%42.4%61.7%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 13,713 12,222
AM Peak Hour 11:45 10:45 11:15 16:30 17:00 17:00
AM Pk Volume 1155 1030 2081 1304 938 2197
Pk Hr Factor 0.888 0.842 0.958 0.874 0.826 0.957
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 1311 1901 3212 0 0 2427 1760 4187
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:00 07:00 16:30 17:00 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 660 961 1616 0 0 1304 938 2197
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.917 0.935 0.955 0.000 0.000 0.874 0.826 0.957
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total25,935
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Avenida Encinas & Paseo Del Norte
21:3021:4522:00
Total25,935
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/8/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_027
NB SB EB WB
0 0 10,634 12,693
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 12 9 21 226 211 437 00:15 14 11 25 220 203 42300:30 11 23 34 206 203 40900:45 14 51 11 54 25 105 221 873 201 818 422 169101:00 12 7 19 200 220 42001:15 7 5 12 228 207 43501:30 10 4 14 208 176 38401:45 9 38 7 23 16 61 202 838 200 803 402 164102:00 10 2 12 219 194 413 02:15 2 9 11 190 184 374 02:30 6 11 17 191 206 397 02:45 7 25 7 29 14 54 221 821 217 801 438 162203:00 2 8 10 197 185 382 03:15 8 11 19 198 202 400 03:30 6 7 13 202 208 410 03:45 17 33 9 35 26 68 174 771 200 795 374 156604:00 5 6 11 220 193 413 04:15 11 11 22 212 224 436 04:30 11 20 31 256 192 448 04:45 10 37 28 65 38 102 250 938 218 827 468 176505:00 8 35 43 238 211 449 05:15 21 30 51 261 256 517 05:30 26 44 70 241 207 448 05:45 35 90 93 202 128 292 211 951 210 884 421 183506:00 50 87 137 201 191 392 06:15 54 98 152 174 219 393 06:30 71 128 199 178 149 327 06:45 92 267 192 505 284 772 155 708 121 680 276 138807:00 99 213 312 155 159 314 07:15 107 380 487 132 113 245 07:30 128 364 492 132 116 248 07:45 99 433 355 1312 454 1745 107 526 85 473 192 99908:00 102 299 401 112 96 208 08:15 109 323 432 104 99 203 08:30 130 281 411 104 84 188 08:45 132 473 239 1142 371 1615 62 382 89 368 151 75009:00 119 216 335 82 87 169 09:15 117 205 322 76 55 131 09:30 140 180 320 71 54 125 09:45 130 506 178 779 308 1285 71 300 50 246 121 54610:00 138 193 331 67 51 118 10:15 132 184 316 33 32 65 10:30 139 177 316 34 35 69 10:45 180 589 198 752 378 1341 41 175 40 158 81 33311:00 173 179 352 35 25 60 11:15 177 195 372 20 21 41 11:30 181 218 399 28 36 64 11:45 175 706 254 846 429 1552 20 103 14 96 34 199
TOTALS 3248 5744 8992 7386 6949 14335
SPLIT %36.1%63.9%38.5%51.5%48.5%61.5%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 10,634 12,693
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:15 07:15 16:30 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 827 1398 1834 1005 892 1882
Pk Hr Factor 0.915 0.920 0.932 0.963 0.871 0.910
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 906 2454 3360 0 0 1889 1711 3600
7 - 9 Peak Hour 08:00 07:15 07:15 16:30 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 473 1398 1834 0 0 1005 892 1882
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.896 0.920 0.932 0.000 0.000 0.963 0.871 0.910
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Avenida Encinas & Paseo Del Norte
Thursday
5/9/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total23,327
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total23,327
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_027 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Avenida Encinas &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_027 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/9/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Avenida Encinas &
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 32
Location: Palomar Airport Road
Between Paseo del Norte and Armada
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_028
NB SB EB WB
0 0 24,273 24,603
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 35 29 64 411 518 929 00:15 22 22 44 472 451 92300:30 28 23 51 425 420 84500:45 17 102 20 94 37 196 448 1756 440 1829 888 358501:00 17 14 31 425 395 82001:15 16 14 30 459 350 80901:30 16 17 33 423 479 90201:45 15 64 15 60 30 124 428 1735 384 1608 812 334302:00 15 11 26 391 415 806 02:15 16 12 28 388 457 845 02:30 16 13 29 345 444 789 02:45 20 67 7 43 27 110 409 1533 482 1798 891 333103:00 12 20 32 380 479 859 03:15 12 16 28 353 480 833 03:30 31 22 53 351 508 859 03:45 47 102 20 78 67 180 326 1410 510 1977 836 338704:00 35 22 57 334 536 870 04:15 31 26 57 344 580 924 04:30 79 38 117 347 609 956 04:45 122 267 66 152 188 419 331 1356 629 2354 960 371005:00 81 67 148 321 624 945 05:15 123 55 178 354 663 1017 05:30 192 90 282 347 704 1051 05:45 288 684 134 346 422 1030 321 1343 567 2558 888 390106:00 225 150 375 337 457 794 06:15 273 157 430 328 421 749 06:30 305 222 527 294 345 639 06:45 376 1179 230 759 606 1938 283 1242 311 1534 594 277607:00 359 241 600 251 297 548 07:15 431 280 711 238 221 459 07:30 558 289 847 198 205 403 07:45 676 2024 265 1075 941 3099 195 882 263 986 458 186808:00 539 287 826 206 209 415 08:15 570 251 821 160 158 318 08:30 546 244 790 121 165 286 08:45 528 2183 245 1027 773 3210 150 637 156 688 306 132509:00 475 286 761 139 165 304 09:15 419 272 691 126 122 248 09:30 468 246 714 124 118 242 09:45 420 1782 297 1101 717 2883 100 489 84 489 184 97810:00 357 351 708 113 97 210 10:15 296 413 709 83 55 138 10:30 347 375 722 83 85 168 10:45 343 1343 413 1552 756 2895 62 341 75 312 137 65311:00 377 400 777 34 51 85 11:15 391 495 886 46 43 89 11:30 423 509 932 34 61 95 11:45 419 1610 582 1986 1001 3596 28 142 42 197 70 339
TOTALS 11407 8273 19680 12866 16330 29196
SPLIT %58.0%42.0%40.3%44.1%55.9%59.7%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 24,273 24,603
AM Peak Hour 07:30 11:15 11:30 12:15 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 2343 2104 3785 1770 2620 3973
Pk Hr Factor 0.866 0.904 0.945 0.938 0.930 0.945
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4207 2102 6309 0 0 2699 4912 7611
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 16:00 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2343 1121 3435 0 0 1356 2620 3973
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.866 0.970 0.913 0.000 0.000 0.977 0.930 0.945
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total48,876
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Paseo Del Norte & Armada Dr
21:3021:4522:00
Total48,876
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/7/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_028
NB SB EB WB
0 0 25,470 26,822
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 38 40 78 433 601 1034 00:15 22 43 65 441 595 103600:30 18 32 50 412 503 91500:45 16 94 25 140 41 234 459 1745 562 2261 1021 400601:00 17 22 39 428 485 91301:15 18 22 40 534 507 104101:30 22 25 47 402 459 86101:45 13 70 11 80 24 150 415 1779 491 1942 906 372102:00 13 9 22 434 515 949 02:15 21 29 50 442 501 943 02:30 14 12 26 407 501 908 02:45 12 60 11 61 23 121 430 1713 462 1979 892 369203:00 18 13 31 404 498 902 03:15 15 11 26 373 469 842 03:30 32 16 48 348 526 874 03:45 48 113 16 56 64 169 355 1480 565 2058 920 353804:00 31 31 62 384 551 935 04:15 34 26 60 334 597 931 04:30 77 55 132 417 631 1048 04:45 116 258 58 170 174 428 325 1460 606 2385 931 384505:00 82 73 155 383 662 1045 05:15 124 76 200 357 697 1054 05:30 203 111 314 392 654 1046 05:45 279 688 107 367 386 1055 360 1492 594 2607 954 409906:00 206 175 381 331 495 826 06:15 288 169 457 291 497 788 06:30 257 164 421 326 423 749 06:45 315 1066 256 764 571 1830 271 1219 428 1843 699 306207:00 407 246 653 278 309 587 07:15 542 247 789 286 339 625 07:30 589 307 896 222 294 516 07:45 589 2127 267 1067 856 3194 252 1038 304 1246 556 228408:00 568 275 843 227 253 480 08:15 587 219 806 222 244 466 08:30 523 279 802 164 232 396 08:45 535 2213 267 1040 802 3253 131 744 180 909 311 165309:00 461 300 761 142 169 311 09:15 399 346 745 165 130 295 09:30 488 293 781 123 112 235 09:45 436 1784 321 1260 757 3044 101 531 84 495 185 102610:00 456 358 814 92 70 162 10:15 379 388 767 84 79 163 10:30 396 396 792 52 82 134 10:45 380 1611 464 1606 844 3217 48 276 66 297 114 57311:00 402 433 835 54 80 134 11:15 430 477 907 45 65 110 11:30 432 518 950 56 52 108 11:45 451 1715 519 1947 970 3662 39 194 45 242 84 436
TOTALS 11799 8558 20357 13671 18264 31935
SPLIT %58.0%42.0%38.9%42.8%57.2%61.1%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 25,470 26,822
AM Peak Hour 07:30 11:30 11:30 12:30 16:45 17:00
AM Pk Volume 2333 2233 3990 1833 2619 4099
Pk Hr Factor 0.990 0.929 0.963 0.858 0.939 0.972
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4340 2107 6447 0 0 2952 4992 7944
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 17:00 16:45 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2333 1096 3401 0 0 1492 2619 4099
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.990 0.893 0.949 0.000 0.000 0.952 0.939 0.972
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Paseo Del Norte & Armada Dr
Wednesday
5/8/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total52,292
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total52,292
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_028 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/7/2019Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Paseo Del Norte &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_028 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Paseo Del Norte &
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 33
Location: Palomar Airport Road
Between Armada and Aviara Parkway
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_029
NB SB EB WB
0 0 22,995 24,258
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 17 30 47 379 473 852 00:15 26 15 41 397 515 91200:30 20 17 37 474 410 88400:45 22 85 23 85 45 170 406 1656 412 1810 818 346601:00 23 22 45 374 485 85901:15 8 13 21 383 364 74701:30 17 21 38 416 444 86001:45 10 58 16 72 26 130 332 1505 395 1688 727 319302:00 24 9 33 340 438 778 02:15 8 11 19 343 445 788 02:30 22 18 40 320 475 795 02:45 11 65 16 54 27 119 408 1411 475 1833 883 324403:00 15 18 33 348 460 808 03:15 18 16 34 334 433 767 03:30 21 13 34 366 514 880 03:45 38 92 22 69 60 161 339 1387 460 1867 799 325404:00 27 24 51 358 531 889 04:15 46 23 69 347 543 890 04:30 68 35 103 382 593 975 04:45 113 254 78 160 191 414 323 1410 533 2200 856 361005:00 86 69 155 340 680 1020 05:15 109 73 182 349 686 1035 05:30 221 105 326 336 555 891 05:45 279 695 135 382 414 1077 352 1377 479 2400 831 377706:00 182 161 343 315 443 758 06:15 224 155 379 291 401 692 06:30 311 247 558 288 348 636 06:45 404 1121 267 830 671 1951 247 1141 363 1555 610 269607:00 388 246 634 238 261 499 07:15 510 263 773 208 241 449 07:30 549 287 836 192 200 392 07:45 612 2059 299 1095 911 3154 188 826 216 918 404 174408:00 513 258 771 177 188 365 08:15 548 307 855 170 168 338 08:30 517 272 789 160 129 289 08:45 521 2099 294 1131 815 3230 151 658 130 615 281 127309:00 400 300 700 112 120 232 09:15 375 327 702 92 115 207 09:30 363 323 686 105 90 195 09:45 367 1505 393 1343 760 2848 90 399 73 398 163 79710:00 322 360 682 66 72 138 10:15 366 406 772 70 67 137 10:30 341 389 730 68 69 137 10:45 335 1364 379 1534 714 2898 66 270 34 242 100 51211:00 314 443 757 44 51 95 11:15 341 439 780 43 42 85 11:30 391 496 887 31 44 75 11:45 367 1413 431 1809 798 3222 27 145 31 168 58 313
TOTALS 10810 8564 19374 12185 15694 27879
SPLIT %55.8%44.2%41.0%43.7%56.3%59.0%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 22,995 24,258
AM Peak Hour 07:30 11:30 11:30 12:00 16:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 2222 1915 3449 1656 2492 3886
Pk Hr Factor 0.908 0.930 0.945 0.873 0.908 0.939
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4158 2226 6384 0 0 2787 4600 7387
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:00 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2222 1151 3373 0 0 1410 2492 3886
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.908 0.937 0.926 0.000 0.000 0.923 0.908 0.939
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/8/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Armada Dr & Aviara Pkwy
21:3021:4522:00
Total47,253
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total47,253
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_029
NB SB EB WB
0 0 23,414 26,876
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 17 16 33 374 609 983 00:15 21 12 33 343 569 91200:30 26 32 58 409 499 90800:45 15 79 18 78 33 157 432 1558 478 2155 910 371301:00 19 10 29 391 458 84901:15 13 8 21 383 505 88801:30 14 15 29 402 492 89401:45 13 59 11 44 24 103 359 1535 454 1909 813 344402:00 22 6 28 364 487 851 02:15 6 11 17 343 444 787 02:30 18 25 43 323 541 864 02:45 22 68 16 58 38 126 341 1371 463 1935 804 330603:00 10 14 24 361 530 891 03:15 21 15 36 349 481 830 03:30 29 17 46 375 528 903 03:45 44 104 21 67 65 171 356 1441 520 2059 876 350004:00 31 30 61 380 584 964 04:15 41 35 76 367 595 962 04:30 81 41 122 408 631 1039 04:45 109 262 64 170 173 432 383 1538 635 2445 1018 398305:00 83 73 156 394 692 1086 05:15 122 71 193 381 714 1095 05:30 204 81 285 318 661 979 05:45 261 670 137 362 398 1032 380 1473 564 2631 944 410406:00 220 154 374 303 574 877 06:15 240 180 420 307 541 848 06:30 315 215 530 287 469 756 06:45 325 1100 269 818 594 1918 271 1168 364 1948 635 311607:00 350 298 648 224 327 551 07:15 455 276 731 243 277 520 07:30 564 317 881 245 222 467 07:45 563 1932 304 1195 867 3127 202 914 236 1062 438 197608:00 567 296 863 214 190 404 08:15 537 322 859 179 184 363 08:30 535 315 850 177 139 316 08:45 543 2182 301 1234 844 3416 130 700 124 637 254 133709:00 458 333 791 116 124 240 09:15 380 327 707 121 123 244 09:30 346 317 663 106 84 190 09:45 350 1534 432 1409 782 2943 105 448 76 407 181 85510:00 345 401 746 77 77 154 10:15 358 411 769 76 57 133 10:30 285 442 727 62 64 126 10:45 366 1354 464 1718 830 3072 50 265 57 255 107 52011:00 345 543 888 55 44 99 11:15 382 481 863 53 42 95 11:30 376 566 942 46 45 91 11:45 371 1474 528 2118 899 3592 31 185 31 162 62 347
TOTALS 10818 9271 20089 12596 17605 30201
SPLIT %53.9%46.1%39.9%41.7%58.3%60.1%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 23,414 26,876
AM Peak Hour 07:30 11:30 11:30 12:30 16:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 2231 2272 3736 1615 2702 4238
Pk Hr Factor 0.984 0.933 0.950 0.935 0.946 0.968
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 4114 2429 6543 0 0 3011 5076 8087
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:30 16:45 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 2231 1239 3470 0 0 1566 2702 4238
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.984 0.962 0.985 0.000 0.000 0.960 0.946 0.968
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total50,290
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Armada Dr & Aviara Pkwy
Thursday
5/9/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total50,290
Project #:CA19_4201_029 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Armada Dr & Aviara
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_029 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/9/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Armada Dr & Aviara
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 34
Location: Palomar Airport Road
Between Aviara Parkway and Camino Vida Roble
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_030
NB SB EB WB
0 0 18,207 17,783
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 19 23 42 297 336 633 00:15 22 12 34 341 345 68600:30 20 11 31 339 323 66200:45 20 81 16 62 36 143 317 1294 268 1272 585 256601:00 21 14 35 290 340 63001:15 6 12 18 296 288 58401:30 14 18 32 347 343 69001:45 13 54 11 55 24 109 270 1203 317 1288 587 249102:00 13 9 22 298 299 597 02:15 6 10 16 248 296 544 02:30 12 12 24 312 320 632 02:45 11 42 16 47 27 89 295 1153 303 1218 598 237103:00 11 11 22 282 320 602 03:15 17 13 30 279 333 612 03:30 15 12 27 284 362 646 03:45 23 66 19 55 42 121 312 1157 362 1377 674 253404:00 23 22 45 305 397 702 04:15 35 18 53 307 390 697 04:30 52 35 87 315 443 758 04:45 78 188 66 141 144 329 312 1239 377 1607 689 284605:00 46 58 104 314 505 819 05:15 71 64 135 304 452 756 05:30 134 96 230 284 333 617 05:45 172 423 107 325 279 748 322 1224 348 1638 670 286206:00 146 104 250 244 314 558 06:15 158 133 291 233 264 497 06:30 222 194 416 220 239 459 06:45 279 805 218 649 497 1454 209 906 235 1052 444 195807:00 272 192 464 183 179 362 07:15 362 219 581 152 141 293 07:30 450 241 691 140 154 294 07:45 467 1551 251 903 718 2454 154 629 143 617 297 124608:00 426 246 672 150 134 284 08:15 436 266 702 130 112 242 08:30 386 236 622 118 103 221 08:45 394 1642 243 991 637 2633 115 513 107 456 222 96909:00 293 270 563 95 99 194 09:15 307 246 553 83 69 152 09:30 283 271 554 82 57 139 09:45 284 1167 302 1089 586 2256 80 340 52 277 132 61710:00 253 261 514 61 58 119 10:15 260 234 494 61 51 112 10:30 263 264 527 60 40 100 10:45 271 1047 297 1056 568 2103 57 239 26 175 83 41411:00 236 322 558 36 39 75 11:15 292 329 621 41 28 69 11:30 256 338 594 27 28 55 11:45 331 1115 326 1315 657 2430 25 129 23 118 48 247
TOTALS 8181 6688 14869 10026 11095 21121
SPLIT %55.0%45.0%41.3%47.5%52.5%58.7%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 18,207 17,783
AM Peak Hour 07:30 11:30 07:30 12:00 16:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1779 1345 2783 1294 1777 3022
Pk Hr Factor 0.952 0.975 0.969 0.949 0.880 0.922
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 3193 1894 5087 0 0 2463 3245 5708
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:15 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1779 1004 2783 0 0 1248 1777 3022
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.952 0.944 0.969 0.000 0.000 0.990 0.880 0.922
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total35,990
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Aviara Pkwy & Camino Vida Roble
21:3021:4522:00
Total35,990
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/8/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_030
NB SB EB WB
0 0 18,154 17,876
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 20 12 32 262 370 632 00:15 16 6 22 289 327 61600:30 26 23 49 292 325 61700:45 14 76 13 54 27 130 358 1201 275 1297 633 249801:00 16 11 27 288 312 60001:15 11 12 23 284 338 62201:30 11 12 23 317 324 64101:45 13 51 8 43 21 94 281 1170 289 1263 570 243302:00 13 3 16 330 311 641 02:15 6 10 16 273 297 570 02:30 10 18 28 304 325 629 02:45 16 45 12 43 28 88 245 1152 305 1238 550 239003:00 8 14 22 277 319 596 03:15 16 12 28 305 312 617 03:30 18 16 34 292 401 693 03:45 26 68 19 61 45 129 261 1135 335 1367 596 250204:00 28 26 54 312 412 724 04:15 22 31 53 308 387 695 04:30 65 46 111 360 471 831 04:45 66 181 66 169 132 350 321 1301 400 1670 721 297105:00 50 57 107 337 520 857 05:15 71 57 128 306 440 746 05:30 134 81 215 285 401 686 05:45 156 411 124 319 280 730 296 1224 352 1713 648 293706:00 153 110 263 257 335 592 06:15 165 129 294 246 302 548 06:30 236 165 401 249 259 508 06:45 233 787 208 612 441 1399 204 956 212 1108 416 206407:00 259 212 471 175 204 379 07:15 285 221 506 183 180 363 07:30 435 258 693 178 144 322 07:45 480 1459 236 927 716 2386 165 701 130 658 295 135908:00 448 257 705 148 120 268 08:15 432 229 661 132 117 249 08:30 350 261 611 119 111 230 08:45 434 1664 237 984 671 2648 96 495 96 444 192 93909:00 293 248 541 108 86 194 09:15 327 232 559 92 78 170 09:30 279 242 521 77 70 147 09:45 276 1175 254 976 530 2151 78 355 61 295 139 65010:00 274 250 524 63 50 113 10:15 254 270 524 64 46 110 10:30 241 270 511 45 36 81 10:45 281 1050 287 1077 568 2127 48 220 39 171 87 39111:00 256 299 555 48 29 77 11:15 297 290 587 42 31 73 11:30 252 325 577 38 26 64 11:45 312 1117 368 1282 680 2399 32 160 19 105 51 265
TOTALS 8084 6547 14631 10070 11329 21399
SPLIT %55.3%44.7%40.6%47.1%52.9%59.4%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 18,154 17,876
AM Peak Hour 07:30 11:30 07:30 16:15 16:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1795 1390 2775 1326 1831 3155
Pk Hr Factor 0.935 0.939 0.969 0.921 0.880 0.920
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 3123 1911 5034 0 0 2525 3383 5908
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 08:00 07:30 16:15 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1795 984 2775 0 0 1326 1831 3155
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.935 0.943 0.969 0.000 0.000 0.921 0.880 0.920
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Aviara Pkwy & Camino Vida Roble
Thursday
5/9/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total36,030
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total36,030
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4201_030 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Aviara Pkwy &
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_030 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/9/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Aviara Pkwy &
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 35
Location: Palomar Airport Road
Between Camino Vida Roble and El Camino Real
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_031
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,960 16,602
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 27 21 48 295 272 567 00:15 19 8 27 314 290 60400:30 19 11 30 312 272 58400:45 20 85 17 57 37 142 260 1181 259 1093 519 227401:00 20 9 29 272 323 59501:15 6 9 15 258 257 51501:30 14 10 24 309 314 62301:45 11 51 9 37 20 88 303 1142 265 1159 568 230102:00 19 11 30 251 274 525 02:15 13 7 20 263 242 505 02:30 11 15 26 324 269 593 02:45 12 55 19 52 31 107 293 1131 266 1051 559 218203:00 18 15 33 345 251 596 03:15 14 9 23 290 273 563 03:30 16 14 30 355 296 651 03:45 11 59 36 74 47 133 327 1317 293 1113 620 243004:00 19 30 49 387 272 659 04:15 24 42 66 354 292 646 04:30 35 92 127 405 334 739 04:45 42 120 148 312 190 432 388 1534 285 1183 673 271705:00 45 78 123 417 313 730 05:15 49 100 149 351 343 694 05:30 114 147 261 318 253 571 05:45 145 353 163 488 308 841 307 1393 255 1164 562 255706:00 104 138 242 300 239 539 06:15 108 198 306 243 202 445 06:30 153 232 385 230 205 435 06:45 215 580 302 870 517 1450 223 996 196 842 419 183807:00 196 282 478 187 163 350 07:15 236 304 540 136 120 256 07:30 340 299 639 165 126 291 07:45 311 1083 344 1229 655 2312 134 622 112 521 246 114308:00 306 338 644 158 111 269 08:15 287 330 617 105 100 205 08:30 301 281 582 128 86 214 08:45 280 1174 306 1255 586 2429 90 481 97 394 187 87509:00 262 303 565 84 81 165 09:15 210 260 470 92 61 153 09:30 230 273 503 78 40 118 09:45 238 940 282 1118 520 2058 82 336 43 225 125 56110:00 201 253 454 62 46 108 10:15 248 240 488 70 49 119 10:30 248 243 491 69 33 102 10:45 222 919 246 982 468 1901 62 263 19 147 81 41011:00 223 265 488 42 34 76 11:15 254 288 542 39 22 61 11:30 236 304 540 34 19 53 11:45 293 1006 281 1138 574 2144 24 139 23 98 47 237
TOTALS 6425 7612 14037 10535 8990 19525
SPLIT %45.8%54.2%41.8%54.0%46.0%58.2%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 16,960 16,602
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:15 16:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1244 1311 2555 1564 1275 2836
Pk Hr Factor 0.915 0.953 0.975 0.938 0.929 0.959
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2257 2484 4741 0 0 2927 2347 5274
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:15 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1244 1311 2555 0 0 1564 1275 2836
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.915 0.953 0.975 0.000 0.000 0.938 0.929 0.959
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/8/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Camino Vida Roble & El Camino Real
21:3021:4522:00
Total33,562
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total33,562
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_031
NB SB EB WB
0 0 17,005 16,585
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 17 9 26 274 313 587 00:15 16 6 22 287 286 57300:30 21 20 41 304 266 57000:45 16 70 7 42 23 112 282 1147 258 1123 540 227001:00 21 9 30 281 274 55501:15 13 4 17 253 327 58001:30 18 9 27 304 274 57801:45 9 61 14 36 23 97 243 1081 257 1132 500 221302:00 10 4 14 304 276 580 02:15 7 16 23 280 261 541 02:30 11 28 39 278 254 532 02:45 16 44 30 78 46 122 262 1124 263 1054 525 217803:00 15 18 33 300 251 551 03:15 15 14 29 288 254 542 03:30 16 18 34 330 303 633 03:45 21 67 34 84 55 151 325 1243 254 1062 579 230504:00 26 29 55 369 280 649 04:15 23 40 63 349 305 654 04:30 44 88 132 458 341 799 04:45 46 139 138 295 184 434 352 1528 318 1244 670 277205:00 34 75 109 450 325 775 05:15 52 103 155 376 327 703 05:30 102 131 233 330 304 634 05:45 134 322 155 464 289 786 326 1482 291 1247 617 272906:00 103 146 249 287 254 541 06:15 156 180 336 268 237 505 06:30 170 190 360 252 211 463 06:45 175 604 280 796 455 1400 202 1009 175 877 377 188607:00 177 291 468 179 184 363 07:15 212 314 526 185 151 336 07:30 306 339 645 186 118 304 07:45 308 1003 283 1227 591 2230 141 691 98 551 239 124208:00 317 324 641 159 101 260 08:15 308 289 597 130 107 237 08:30 277 339 616 121 94 215 08:45 264 1166 288 1240 552 2406 102 512 90 392 192 90409:00 256 334 590 101 65 166 09:15 251 222 473 93 45 138 09:30 228 241 469 83 53 136 09:45 252 987 247 1044 499 2031 78 355 62 225 140 58010:00 220 225 445 57 43 100 10:15 238 241 479 70 40 110 10:30 231 236 467 51 28 79 10:45 213 902 261 963 474 1865 53 231 36 147 89 37811:00 225 282 507 50 25 75 11:15 274 265 539 40 26 66 11:30 291 290 581 48 26 74 11:45 275 1065 330 1167 605 2232 34 172 18 95 52 267
TOTALS 6430 7436 13866 10575 9149 19724
SPLIT %46.4%53.6%41.3%53.6%46.4%58.7%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 17,005 16,585
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 16:30 16:30 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1239 1260 2474 1636 1311 2947
Pk Hr Factor 0.977 0.929 0.959 0.893 0.961 0.922
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2169 2467 4636 0 0 3010 2491 5501
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:30 16:30 16:30 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1239 1260 2474 0 0 1636 1311 2947
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.977 0.929 0.959 0.000 0.000 0.893 0.961 0.922
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total33,590
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Camino Vida Roble & El Camino Real
Thursday
5/9/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total33,590
Project #:CA19_4201_031 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/8/2019Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Camino Vida Roble
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_031 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/9/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Camino Vida Roble
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
36
Palomar Airport Road
Between El Camino Real and El Fuerte
15 Minute Volume Report
Day: Wednesday
Date: 3/20/2019
Prepared bvNDS/ATD
VOLUME
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. El Camino Real & Loker Ave West/Innovation Way
City: Carlsbad
Project#: CA19_ 4085_041
DAILY TOTALS ~
AM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL PM Period NB SB EB WB TOTAL
00:00 34 19 53 12:00 479 407 886
00:15 50 24 74 12:15 405 419 824
00:30 33 21 54-12:30 469 388 857
00:45 15 132 18 82 33 214 12:45 396 1749 436 1650 832 3399
01:00 30 8 38 13:00 424 426 850
01:15 20 12 32 13:15 386 414 800
01:30 26 9 35 13:30 455 381 836
01:45 12 88 13 42 25 130 13:45 442 1707 357 1578 799 3285
02:00 13 10 23 14:00 474 355 829
02:15 16 14 30 14:15 451 390 841
02:30 9 17 26 14:30 530 387 917
02:45 15 53 19 60 34 113 14:45 522 1977 358 1490 880 3467
03:00 9 17 26 15:00 521 373 894
03:15 11 25 36 15:15 560 345 905
03:30 19 25 44 15:30 581 425 1006
03:45 27 66 40 107 67 173 15:45 526 2188 434 1577 960 3765
04:00 29 47 76 16:00 610 482 1092
04:15 31 55 86 16:15 600 440 1040
04:30 27 126 153 16:30 610 471 1081
04:45 56 143 182 410 238 553 16:45 618 2438 472 1865 1090 4303
05:00 70 127 197 17:00 603 502 1105
05:15 75 151 226 17:15 563 477 1040
05:30 92 208 300 17:30 516 433 949
05:45 162 399 346 832 508 1231 17:45 556 2238 376 1788 932 4026
06:00 144 252 396 18:00 452 384 836
06:15 145 312 457 18:15 462 300 762
06:30 188 387 575 18:30 395 295 690
06:45 261 738 514 1465 775 2203 18:45 354 1663 271 1250 625 2913
07:00 282 493 775 19:00 323 260 583
07:15 319 541 860 19:15 309 210 519
07:30 411 518 929 19:30 286 198 484
07:45 405 1417 626 2178 1031 3595 19:45 286 1204 156 824 442 2028
08:00 431 577 1008 20:00 251 190 441
08:15 415 614 1029 20:15 251 154 405
08:30 418 534 952 20:30 204 152 356
08:45 336 1600 635 2360 971 3960 20:45 192 898 109 605 301 1503
09:00 358 468 826 21:00 162 117 279
09:15 327 470 797 21:15 180 96 276
09:30 283 466 749 21:30 155 85 240
09:45 340 1308 413 1817 753 3125 21:45 118 615 83 381 201 996
10:00 345 388 733 22:00 139 89 228
10:15 300 380 680 22:15 111 64 175
10:30 325 408 733 22:30 118 63 181
10:45 330 1300 393 1569 723 2869 22:45 98 466 41 257 139 723
11:00 316 398 714 23:00 75 53 128
11:15 374 416 790 23:15 81 36 117
.11:30 394 395 789 23:30 62 37 99
11:45 415 1499 377 1586 792 3085 23:45 45 263 18 144 63 407
TOTALS 8743 12508 21251 TOTALS 17406 13409 30815
SPLIT% 41.1% 58.9% 40.8% SPLIT % 56.5% 43.5% 59.2%
DAIL V TOTALS ~
AM Peak Hour 11:45 08:00 07:45 PM Peak Hour 16:00 16:30 16:15
AM Pk Volume 1768 2360 4020 PM Pk Volume 2438 192i. 4316
Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0,929 0.975 Pk Hr Factor 0.986 0.957 0.976
7-9Volume 3017 4538 7555 4 -6Volume 4576 3653 8329
7 • 9 Peak Hour 07:45 08:00 07:45 4 -6 Peak Hour 16:00 16:30 16:15
7 • 9 Pk Volume 1669 2360 4020 4 • 6 Pk Volume 2438 1922 4316
Pk Hr factor 0.968 0.929 0.975 Pk Hr Factor 0.986 0.957 0,976
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
37
Palomar Airport Road
Between El Fuerte and Melrose Drive
15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4342_001
NB SB EB WB
0 0 26,449 29,023
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 44 12 56 377 441 818 00:15 30 20 50 400 413 81300:30 31 25 56 408 445 85300:45 20 125 15 72 35 197 382 1567 471 1770 853 333701:00 19 9 28 431 399 83001:15 30 6 36 431 424 85501:30 22 5 27 443 401 84401:45 16 87 11 31 27 118 445 1750 419 1643 864 339302:00 20 13 33 491 373 864 02:15 15 18 33 445 372 817 02:30 14 18 32 608 367 975 02:45 10 59 18 67 28 126 500 2044 413 1525 913 356903:00 15 22 37 624 348 972 03:15 10 24 34 464 392 856 03:30 7 28 35 665 411 1076 03:45 13 45 66 140 79 185 607 2360 446 1597 1053 395704:00 32 68 100 601 454 1055 04:15 18 140 158 682 437 1119 04:30 37 149 186 760 473 1233 04:45 49 136 233 590 282 726 764 2807 440 1804 1204 461105:00 40 174 214 694 431 1125 05:15 59 253 312 787 415 1202 05:30 70 370 440 707 406 1113 05:45 104 273 592 1389 696 1662 611 2799 385 1637 996 443606:00 100 358 458 604 294 898 06:15 103 414 517 535 342 877 06:30 147 550 697 489 289 778 06:45 215 565 644 1966 859 2531 432 2060 269 1194 701 325407:00 176 708 884 382 223 605 07:15 277 752 1029 344 230 574 07:30 249 816 1065 270 180 450 07:45 324 1026 872 3148 1196 4174 267 1263 153 786 420 204908:00 332 778 1110 285 172 457 08:15 337 671 1008 226 114 340 08:30 367 747 1114 236 138 374 08:45 277 1313 709 2905 986 4218 220 967 139 563 359 153009:00 277 612 889 217 110 327 09:15 304 461 765 204 100 304 09:30 265 488 753 167 96 263 09:45 287 1133 513 2074 800 3207 121 709 75 381 196 109010:00 256 431 687 128 66 194 10:15 281 413 694 97 52 149 10:30 308 440 748 160 60 220 10:45 313 1158 420 1704 733 2862 88 473 55 233 143 70611:00 323 383 706 110 31 141 11:15 361 425 786 97 30 127 11:30 337 452 789 79 19 98 11:45 367 1388 408 1668 775 3056 56 342 56 136 112 478
TOTALS 7308 15754 23062 19141 13269 32410
SPLIT %31.7%68.3%41.6%59.1%40.9%58.4%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 26,449 29,023
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:15 07:45 16:30 15:45 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1552 3218 4428 3005 1810 4764
Pk Hr Factor 0.951 0.923 0.926 0.955 0.957 0.966
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2339 6053 8392 0 0 5606 3441 9047
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:45 16:30 16:00 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1360 3218 4428 0 0 3005 1804 4764
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.926 0.923 0.926 0.000 0.000 0.955 0.953 0.966
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total55,472
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. El Fuerte St & Melrose Dr
21:3021:4522:00
Total55,472
19:3019:4520:0020:15
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
16:4517:0017:15
Tuesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
9/10/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
VOLUMEPrepared by National Data & Surveying Services
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4342_001
NB SB EB WB
0 0 26,553 28,684
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 68 29 97 406 409 815 00:15 35 19 54 435 439 87400:30 41 19 60 380 459 83900:45 24 168 19 86 43 254 388 1609 440 1747 828 335601:00 34 9 43 479 392 87101:15 12 18 30 395 413 80801:30 17 11 28 426 398 82401:45 14 77 15 53 29 130 445 1745 424 1627 869 337202:00 15 14 29 458 374 832 02:15 8 17 25 446 379 825 02:30 16 21 37 597 341 938 02:45 16 55 18 70 34 125 540 2041 373 1467 913 350803:00 8 13 21 507 372 879 03:15 8 23 31 591 373 964 03:30 16 38 54 563 472 1035 03:45 21 53 68 142 89 195 598 2259 409 1626 1007 388504:00 12 71 83 612 445 1057 04:15 19 114 133 732 434 1166 04:30 28 136 164 773 463 1236 04:45 56 115 217 538 273 653 702 2819 462 1804 1164 462305:00 39 173 212 754 458 1212 05:15 51 272 323 765 425 1190 05:30 85 364 449 734 385 1119 05:45 106 281 564 1373 670 1654 678 2931 383 1651 1061 458206:00 89 355 444 562 342 904 06:15 98 443 541 508 332 840 06:30 159 550 709 419 280 699 06:45 220 566 714 2062 934 2628 405 1894 271 1225 676 311907:00 193 699 892 363 194 557 07:15 289 720 1009 385 199 584 07:30 268 757 1025 356 181 537 07:45 370 1120 848 3024 1218 4144 299 1403 160 734 459 213708:00 286 805 1091 242 151 393 08:15 362 837 1199 245 138 383 08:30 309 757 1066 245 104 349 08:45 294 1251 706 3105 1000 4356 225 957 111 504 336 146109:00 317 556 873 185 91 276 09:15 270 489 759 199 88 287 09:30 280 496 776 169 68 237 09:45 264 1131 490 2031 754 3162 133 686 49 296 182 98210:00 269 376 645 169 55 224 10:15 273 418 691 108 41 149 10:30 268 428 696 128 31 159 10:45 328 1138 422 1644 750 2782 112 517 29 156 141 67311:00 325 391 716 122 20 142 11:15 371 397 768 91 21 112 11:30 326 431 757 93 15 108 11:45 363 1385 427 1646 790 3031 46 352 17 73 63 425
TOTALS 7340 15774 23114 19213 12910 32123
SPLIT %31.8%68.2%41.8%59.8%40.2%58.2%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 26,553 28,684
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:30 07:45 16:30 16:15 16:30
AM Pk Volume 1584 3247 4574 2994 1817 4802
Pk Hr Factor 0.910 0.957 0.939 0.968 0.981 0.971
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2371 6129 8500 0 0 5750 3455 9205
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:30 07:45 16:30 16:15 16:30
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1327 3247 4574 0 0 2994 1817 4802
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.897 0.957 0.939 0.000 0.000 0.968 0.981 0.971
Prepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesVOLUME
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. El Fuerte St & Melrose Dr
Wednesday
9/11/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total55,237
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:4514:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:1515:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:4517:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:4520:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
DAILY TOTALS Total55,237
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
Project #:CA19_4342_001 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/10/2019Palomar Airport Rd Bet. El Fuerte St &
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4342_001 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:9/11/2019
Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. El Fuerte St &
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number: 38
Location: Palomar Airport Road
Between Melrose Drive and City Limits
Contents: 15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_032
NB SB EB WB
0 0 17,728 17,752
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 36 19 55 276 290 566 00:15 21 11 32 284 270 55400:30 14 15 29 285 293 57800:45 20 91 15 60 35 151 266 1111 305 1158 571 226901:00 54 10 64 274 270 54401:15 10 9 19 289 297 58601:30 14 9 23 317 271 58801:45 10 88 9 37 19 125 277 1157 271 1109 548 226602:00 16 12 28 291 226 517 02:15 13 17 30 337 248 585 02:30 8 9 17 485 242 727 02:45 8 45 13 51 21 96 404 1517 252 968 656 248503:00 11 16 27 379 257 636 03:15 4 18 22 374 258 632 03:30 11 45 56 375 278 653 03:45 11 37 59 138 70 175 400 1528 222 1015 622 254304:00 14 36 50 441 284 725 04:15 12 51 63 441 278 719 04:30 27 93 120 437 295 732 04:45 38 91 144 324 182 415 471 1790 283 1140 754 293005:00 38 105 143 503 278 781 05:15 35 168 203 488 278 766 05:30 47 273 320 471 294 765 05:45 70 190 358 904 428 1094 386 1848 267 1117 653 296506:00 55 232 287 348 241 589 06:15 81 271 352 332 211 543 06:30 115 315 430 280 196 476 06:45 140 391 365 1183 505 1574 246 1206 171 819 417 202507:00 149 364 513 221 150 371 07:15 183 377 560 234 172 406 07:30 211 383 594 182 160 342 07:45 229 772 384 1508 613 2280 199 836 127 609 326 144508:00 245 401 646 157 110 267 08:15 219 373 592 134 123 257 08:30 194 356 550 139 108 247 08:45 212 870 421 1551 633 2421 128 558 84 425 212 98309:00 224 329 553 104 74 178 09:15 202 265 467 100 60 160 09:30 180 272 452 88 76 164 09:45 197 803 297 1163 494 1966 87 379 75 285 162 66410:00 187 235 422 90 47 137 10:15 218 236 454 72 41 113 10:30 233 221 454 76 37 113 10:45 249 887 237 929 486 1816 66 304 30 155 96 45911:00 261 233 494 75 26 101 11:15 231 254 485 38 21 59 11:30 260 277 537 42 14 56 11:45 289 1041 266 1030 555 2071 33 188 13 74 46 262
TOTALS 5306 8878 14184 12422 8874 21296
SPLIT %37.4%62.6%40.0%58.3%41.7%60.0%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 17,728 17,752
AM Peak Hour 11:45 08:00 07:30 16:45 12:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1134 1551 2445 1933 1165 3066
Pk Hr Factor 0.981 0.921 0.946 0.961 0.955 0.981
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 1642 3059 4701 0 0 3638 2257 5895
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 08:00 07:30 16:45 16:00 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 904 1551 2445 0 0 1933 1140 3066
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.922 0.921 0.946 0.000 0.000 0.961 0.966 0.981
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/1/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Melrose Dr & City Limits
21:3021:4522:00
Total35,480
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total35,480
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_032
NB SB EB WB
0 0 18,107 17,878
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 45 17 62 290 267 557 00:15 25 16 41 260 270 53000:30 15 17 32 317 300 61700:45 10 95 18 68 28 163 281 1148 295 1132 576 228001:00 48 12 60 287 282 56901:15 20 8 28 279 296 57501:30 15 10 25 323 265 58801:45 17 100 10 40 27 140 290 1179 269 1112 559 229102:00 11 16 27 346 247 593 02:15 9 9 18 327 254 581 02:30 10 13 23 440 249 689 02:45 14 44 13 51 27 95 404 1517 258 1008 662 252503:00 6 10 16 402 263 665 03:15 10 19 29 379 259 638 03:30 9 42 51 428 255 683 03:45 7 32 69 140 76 172 402 1611 281 1058 683 266904:00 8 31 39 444 256 700 04:15 14 48 62 458 280 738 04:30 21 97 118 459 277 736 04:45 38 81 142 318 180 399 453 1814 270 1083 723 289705:00 27 98 125 489 271 760 05:15 35 161 196 466 282 748 05:30 57 232 289 464 294 758 05:45 60 179 353 844 413 1023 384 1803 267 1114 651 291706:00 81 215 296 355 258 613 06:15 87 266 353 320 242 562 06:30 121 320 441 280 224 504 06:45 164 453 337 1138 501 1591 266 1221 205 929 471 215007:00 143 369 512 219 178 397 07:15 180 388 568 192 145 337 07:30 223 378 601 195 117 312 07:45 215 761 429 1564 644 2325 191 797 106 546 297 134308:00 269 395 664 122 116 238 08:15 249 386 635 161 100 261 08:30 237 374 611 133 95 228 08:45 237 992 358 1513 595 2505 139 555 112 423 251 97809:00 200 348 548 131 89 220 09:15 213 272 485 125 69 194 09:30 211 278 489 84 62 146 09:45 204 828 288 1186 492 2014 89 429 62 282 151 71110:00 180 275 455 92 67 159 10:15 223 259 482 68 42 110 10:30 228 233 461 86 47 133 10:45 251 882 241 1008 492 1890 69 315 34 190 103 50511:00 258 241 499 67 41 108 11:15 255 243 498 48 34 82 11:30 277 264 541 41 18 59 11:45 287 1077 266 1014 553 2091 38 194 24 117 62 311
TOTALS 5524 8884 14408 12583 8994 21577
SPLIT %38.3%61.7%40.0%58.3%41.7%60.0%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 18,107 17,878
AM Peak Hour 11:45 07:15 07:45 16:45 12:30 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1154 1590 2554 1872 1173 2989
Pk Hr Factor 0.910 0.927 0.962 0.957 0.978 0.983
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 1753 3077 4830 0 0 3617 2197 5814
7 - 9 Peak Hour 08:00 07:15 07:45 16:45 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 992 1590 2554 0 0 1872 1117 2989
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.922 0.927 0.962 0.000 0.000 0.957 0.950 0.983
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total35,985
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Melrose Dr & City Limits
Thursday
5/2/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total35,985
Project #:CA19_4201_032 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/1/2019Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Melrose Dr & City
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_032 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/2/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
Palomar Airport Rd Bet. Melrose Dr & City
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
City of Carlsbad
Roadway Level of Service Analysis
MIDBLOCK COUNT SUMMARY
Number:
Location:
Contents:
39
La Costa Avenue
Between Piraeus St and El Camino Real
15 Minute Volume Report Day 1
15 Minute Volume Report Day 2
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 1
24-Hour Volume Plot Day 2
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_033
NB SB EB WB
0 0 19,195 18,990
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 31 12 43 267 266 533 00:15 24 10 34 286 285 57100:30 22 8 30 268 280 54800:45 19 96 8 38 27 134 264 1085 254 1085 518 217001:00 12 15 27 281 314 59501:15 10 9 19 283 266 54901:30 6 4 10 299 285 58401:45 14 42 9 37 23 79 331 1194 259 1124 590 231802:00 11 2 13 312 280 592 02:15 7 5 12 300 282 582 02:30 11 2 13 321 367 688 02:45 6 35 2 11 8 46 371 1304 337 1266 708 257003:00 4 2 6 299 361 660 03:15 10 11 21 343 345 688 03:30 19 10 29 386 290 676 03:45 21 54 29 52 50 106 330 1358 324 1320 654 267804:00 18 17 35 379 313 692 04:15 15 22 37 362 352 714 04:30 27 34 61 370 330 700 04:45 48 108 52 125 100 233 411 1522 365 1360 776 288205:00 40 74 114 421 330 751 05:15 65 82 147 393 381 774 05:30 94 103 197 417 367 784 05:45 148 347 148 407 296 754 424 1655 318 1396 742 305106:00 113 209 322 434 288 722 06:15 137 270 407 388 296 684 06:30 154 287 441 344 275 619 06:45 238 642 351 1117 589 1759 281 1447 231 1090 512 253707:00 242 391 633 222 214 436 07:15 295 415 710 241 192 433 07:30 300 442 742 250 178 428 07:45 382 1219 448 1696 830 2915 228 941 151 735 379 167608:00 334 398 732 231 128 359 08:15 334 398 732 183 124 307 08:30 310 372 682 199 109 308 08:45 322 1300 342 1510 664 2810 163 776 111 472 274 124809:00 271 280 551 168 100 268 09:15 248 324 572 157 98 255 09:30 249 318 567 118 75 193 09:45 251 1019 331 1253 582 2272 105 548 53 326 158 87410:00 238 282 520 100 69 169 10:15 256 314 570 105 39 144 10:30 191 246 437 104 57 161 10:45 248 933 278 1120 526 2053 79 388 34 199 113 58711:00 249 280 529 70 32 102 11:15 210 299 509 39 29 68 11:30 264 301 565 28 17 45 11:45 281 1004 282 1162 563 2166 41 178 11 89 52 267
TOTALS 6799 8528 15327 12396 10462 22858
SPLIT %44.4%55.6%40.1%54.2%45.8%59.9%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 19,195 18,990
AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:30 17:15 16:45 16:45
AM Pk Volume 1360 1703 3036 1668 1443 3085
Pk Hr Factor 0.890 0.950 0.914 0.961 0.947 0.984
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2519 3206 5725 0 0 3177 2756 5933
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:30 17:00 16:45 16:45
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1360 1703 3036 0 0 1655 1443 3085
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.890 0.950 0.914 0.000 0.000 0.976 0.947 0.984
VOLUMEPrepared by NDS/ATD
13:1513:3013:45
12:0012:1512:3012:4513:00
16:1516:30
14:0014:1514:30
5/1/2019
14:4515:00
DAILY TOTALS
PM Period
16:4517:0017:15
Wednesday
17:3017:45
15:1515:3015:4516:00
18:0018:1518:3018:4519:0019:15
La Costa Ave Bet. Piraeus St & El Camino Real
21:3021:4522:00
Total38,185
19:3019:4520:0020:15
DAILY TOTALS
22:1522:3022:4523:0023:1523:30
TOTAL
23:45
TOTALS
Total38,185
DAILY TOTALS
21:0021:15
20:30
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
SPLIT %
TOTAL
Pk Hr Factor
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
20:45
Day:City:Carlsbad
Date:Project #:CA19_4201_033
NB SB EB WB
0 0 19,399 19,245
AM Period NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB
00:00 25 11 36 247 302 549 00:15 33 12 45 296 274 57000:30 18 8 26 269 310 57900:45 15 91 5 36 20 127 267 1079 286 1172 553 225101:00 16 8 24 260 293 55301:15 18 10 28 288 258 54601:30 14 4 18 237 258 49501:45 10 58 2 24 12 82 284 1069 301 1110 585 217902:00 12 3 15 312 317 629 02:15 9 5 14 310 352 662 02:30 9 3 12 355 330 685 02:45 3 33 5 16 8 49 329 1306 332 1331 661 263703:00 11 11 22 338 334 672 03:15 10 10 20 385 346 731 03:30 17 16 33 322 389 711 03:45 19 57 16 53 35 110 353 1398 336 1405 689 280304:00 16 22 38 387 344 731 04:15 19 20 39 395 325 720 04:30 32 23 55 412 370 782 04:45 44 111 49 114 93 225 364 1558 327 1366 691 292405:00 38 65 103 423 355 778 05:15 55 83 138 422 383 805 05:30 107 122 229 405 370 775 05:45 129 329 144 414 273 743 401 1651 326 1434 727 308506:00 145 210 355 379 317 696 06:15 149 260 409 336 298 634 06:30 180 306 486 353 280 633 06:45 217 691 317 1093 534 1784 351 1419 222 1117 573 253607:00 268 439 707 238 225 463 07:15 292 410 702 268 184 452 07:30 325 451 776 223 160 383 07:45 399 1284 399 1699 798 2983 253 982 152 721 405 170308:00 341 389 730 219 134 353 08:15 337 374 711 244 142 386 08:30 317 349 666 207 129 336 08:45 339 1334 366 1478 705 2812 200 870 102 507 302 137709:00 294 303 597 173 98 271 09:15 235 318 553 142 111 253 09:30 278 301 579 135 94 229 09:45 251 1058 321 1243 572 2301 104 554 79 382 183 93610:00 247 310 557 105 57 162 10:15 232 277 509 85 48 133 10:30 233 293 526 75 48 123 10:45 270 982 275 1155 545 2137 85 350 38 191 123 54111:00 222 265 487 65 37 102 11:15 202 280 482 67 29 96 11:30 260 277 537 37 16 53 11:45 240 924 255 1077 495 2001 42 211 25 107 67 318
TOTALS 6952 8402 15354 12447 10843 23290
SPLIT %45.3%54.7%39.7%53.4%46.6%60.3%
NB SB EB WB
0 0 19,399 19,245
AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:30 17:00 16:30 17:00
AM Pk Volume 1402 1699 3015 1651 1435 3085
Pk Hr Factor 0.878 0.942 0.945 0.976 0.937 0.958
7 - 9 Volume 0 0 2618 3177 5795 0 0 3209 2800 6009
7 - 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:00 07:30 17:00 16:30 17:00
7 - 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1402 1699 3015 0 0 1651 1435 3085
Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.878 0.942 0.945 0.000 0.000 0.976 0.937 0.958
Pk Hr Factor
4 - 6 Volume
4 - 6 Peak Hour
4 - 6 Pk Volume
Pk Hr Factor
DAILY TOTALS
DAILY TOTALS Total38,644
PM Peak Hour
PM Pk Volume
23:0023:1523:3023:45
TOTALS
SPLIT %
21:3021:4522:0022:1522:3022:45
20:0020:1520:3020:4521:0021:15
18:3018:4519:0019:1519:3019:45
17:0017:1517:3017:4518:0018:15
15:3015:4516:0016:1516:3016:45
14:0014:1514:3014:4515:0015:15
12:3012:4513:0013:1513:3013:45
TOTAL PM Period TOTAL
12:0012:15
Prepared by NDS/ATDVOLUME
La Costa Ave Bet. Piraeus St & El Camino Real
Thursday
5/2/2019
DAILY TOTALS Total38,644
Project #:CA19_4201_033 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/1/2019La Costa Ave Bet. Piraeus St & El Camino
Prepared by NDS/ATD
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
Project #:CA19_4201_033 City:Carlsbad
Location:Date:5/2/2019
Prepared by NDS/ATD
La Costa Ave Bet. Piraeus St & El Camino
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
00
:
0
0
01
:
0
0
02
:
0
0
03
:
0
0
04
:
0
0
05
:
0
0
06
:
0
0
07
:
0
0
08
:
0
0
09
:
0
0
10
:
0
0
11
:
0
0
12
:
0
0
13
:
0
0
14
:
0
0
15
:
0
0
16
:
0
0
17
:
0
0
18
:
0
0
19
:
0
0
20
:
0
0
21
:
0
0
22
:
0
0
23
:
0
0
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
NB SB EB WB
a bl 2 C e -ompanng OS f rem e e 0 o ogy an M h d I d U d. t d C na J s e apac, :y
Count Old LOS Method New LOS Method /S r t1 I d,: L mts
8 S8
l City l mlts to Marro Road A A F F
2 Marron Road to Carlsbad VlllaRe Drive A A C C
3 carlsbad VIiiage Drive to Tamarack Avenue A A A A
4 Tamarack Avenue to Cannon Road A A C F
5 cannon Road to College Boulevard 0 A F F
e, m no Re 6 College Boulevard to Palomar Airport Road A A 8 B
7 Palomar Airport Road to Camino Vtda Roble A A D D
8 Camino Vida Roble to Poinsettia Lane A A C C
9 Poinsettia Lane to Avlara Park\oay-Alga Rd A A C C
10 Avlara Parkwav•AJfi!a Road to La Costa Ave A C C F
11 La Costa Avenue to Leucadia Boulewrd A A C D
12 City Limits to Carlsbad v11 I age Or Ive A A E D
Coll iC Bo C rd 13 Carlsbad VIiiage Drive to Cannon Road A A D D
u El Camino Real to Aston Avenue A A 0 D
15 Aston Avenue to Palomar Air part Road A A 8 F
A.v'iara Parkway 16 Palomar Alroort Road to Polnsetti.!i Lane A A D D
17 atv limits to Palomar Al rcort Road A A C F
'I rose Drive 18 Palomar Airport Rd to Poinsettia Ln A A ,c C
19 Poinsettia Ln to Rancho Santa Fe Rd A A C C
20 City Limits to CarNno Junlpero A A C C
cho n Fe 21 Camino Junlpero to La Costa Avenue A A C C
Road 22 La CostdlAvenue to Calle Barcelona A A D C
B Calle Barcelona to Oliven hab Ro.ad A A C C
f/W Count Old LOS Method Nl!w LOS Method rrr s 'Ind,: L nuts
8 EB 8 EB
24 Avenida Encinas to Paseo del Norte A A F F
25 Paseodel Norte to car country A A C C
no Road 26 car country to Legoland Dr A A C C
27 Luo land Dr to Faraday Ave A A C 0
28 Faraday Ave to EiC min o Real A A C C
29 El camlno Real to Colle2e Boulevard A A E F
30 carlsbad Blvd to Avenlda Encinas A A 8 B
31 Aven da Enc inas to Pasodel Norte A A F F
32 Pase o, del Norte to Armada A A 0 D
33 Armada to Avlara Pk\YV A A C C
P oma, rpo R d 34 Aviara Pkv.ty to camlno Vida Roble A A B B
35 Camino Vida Roble to El Camino Real A A C C
36 El (amino Real to El Fuerte A A C C
37 El FuertetoMelroseOr A A F F
38 Melrose Or to Cltv Limits A A C C
La Cost AYenue 39 Piraeus St to El Camino Real A A F C
From:Gmail
To:City Clerk; Council Internet Email
Subject:Marja acres
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 4:27:39 PM
Hello
I am writing to voice my concern over the marja acres project. I have been a resident of Carlsbad for 39 years. I was
raised here as well as my husband. We have also chosen to raise our family here. When I now drive down El
Camino real I’m crushed by the amount of development and traffic. This used to be land, shrubbery, farm land ect. I
understand that we are obligated by forces beyond us to build on land to accommodate the huge desire of people to
live in CA. I am however unable to understand how developers slide past with their money and are able to change
general plans and zoning laws. As a parent of children In the public school system I am very concerned especially
now. This will add so much more stress on our already very crowded schools. This is just greed. I am hopefully the
council will see that enough is enough.
Alicia Torres- Leucadia Children's School-
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
From:Sarah Osborne
To:City Clerk; Council Internet Email
Subject:Marja Acres Project
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 7:24:44 PM
Dear Council Members and City Clerk,
The development at Marja Acres will cause more problems on El Camino Real than we already have,
especially since the addition of the Robertson’s Ranch development. Soon, we will have the addition
of the Madonna Inn Elderly home to add to the congestion. Please do not let the Marja Acres
Project Development circumvent our Carlsbad General Plan. Our streets, schools and city services
will be even more strained, and it sends a message to the community that our quality of life is being
ignored. Please don't allow concessions or waivers in regards to development standards. We have
a resident approved Carlsbad General Plan. Please follow it. I am a Carlsbad Resident since the age
of 2 in 1975. It’s all I’ve known, and even though it isn’t what it was is all the more reason to
preserve what we can. I have to drive on El Camino Real between Carlsbad Village Drive and College
to go to work and to see my parents and family. It is disturbing and sad to think taking the freeway
may be faster.
Thanks,
Sarah Osborne
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
From:Keith Hunter
To:City Clerk; Council Internet Email; Teri Delcamp
Subject:Marja Acres Development
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 10:02:06 PM
Dear City Clerk and Council Members,
I am writing to express my opposition to the Marja Acres development. There are several
reasons why this project is fundamentally wrong for Carlsbad:
It will adversely impact traffic on El Camino Real between Tamarack and Cannon. This
portion of El Camino Real is already heavily congested during rush hour and theaddition of 296 houses (most with 2-car garages), plus additional traffic lights will
exponentially add to the congestion.It's not near major transit or within walking distance to basic amenities such as grocery
stores, which seems to be a requirement for "affordable housing."It's far too dense for the area.
It supplants existing open space and several long-time local businesses withdevelopment sprawl.
It depends on state mandates for affordable housing as loopholes to gain the granting ofincentives and concessions, as well as waivers and/or reductions of development
standards. This sets a bad precedent by allowing violations of city land use policy andopens the door for developers to further use this loophole to push through more sprawl
projects. Please stick with the Carlsbad General Plan and help the city retain localcontrol of its zoning and planning.
The Marja Acres developers are cynically using state affordable housing mandates to addadditional sprawl to Carlsbad. Please deny this project as it's currently planned and help your
constituents preserve the Envision Carlsbad core value of "small town community feel."
I request that this be added to the public record.
Thank you,
Keith Hunter
Carlsbad, CA 92008
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
•
•
•
•
•
From:Sandi Meyer
To:City Clerk; Council Internet Email
Subject:Marja Acres Development
Date:Wednesday, October 28, 2020 11:04:21 PM
To the City Council of Carlsbad:
I have resided in NW Carlsbad, near Tamarack and Edinburgh, for more than 33years. I am extremely concerned about the Marja Acres proposeddevelopment.
I would not oppose the development IF it followed the General Plan BUT itappears the developer is proposing to bypass the Carlsbad General Plan. TheGeneral Plan allows a maximum of 195 units for dwellings on the 13 acre site. The developer wants to build 296 units. Please do NOT allow this to happen.
You, the council we elected, should not allow the developer to utilize CaliforniaState Mandates to evade the Carlsbad General Plan. Carlsbad does not needmore traffic congestion. Carlsbad does not need to add additional burdens toour schools and services provided by our city.
When considering this issue I hope you will do what is best for those of us wholive in Carlsbad – and that is to reject the developer’s plan. There must be nomore than 195 units. Think of why you chose to live in this wonderful seasidecommunity as well. Think about what a precedent you would set if theCarlsbad General Plan is ignored. Not a good one!!!
The General Plan for Growth Management that was adopted and approved byour city leaders and citizens is not to keep people out of Carlsbad. The purposeis to limit our growth so that Carlsbad can be managed properly, thus avoidingovercrowding and, at the same time, provide a safe environment in which tolive. If you approve the developer’s plan you will be sending a message to allCarlsbadians that you do not care about what is best for our current and futureresidents.
I implore each of you to consider the long-term impact of this “alternativedevelopment” and reject the proposal as submitted that will be presented toCity Council on November 3. As I recall the objective of the General Plan is toprovide a well governed and planned community that serves all of its present
and future citizens.
Sincerely,
Sandra Meyer
Carlsbad, CA 92010
mtnest2009@gmail.com
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
From:Council Internet Email
Cc:Teri Delcamp; Don Neu; Melissa Flores; Faviola Medina; Tammy Cloud-McMinn
Subject:FW: Marja Acres Project
Date:Thursday, October 29, 2020 9:22:13 AM
From: Sarah Osborne <SarahD@callawaygolf.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2020 7:25 PM
To: City Clerk <Clerk@carlsbadca.gov>; Council Internet Email <CityCouncil@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: Marja Acres Project
Dear Council Members and City Clerk,
The development at Marja Acres will cause more problems on El Camino Real than we already have,
especially since the addition of the Robertson’s Ranch development. Soon, we will have the addition
of the Madonna Inn Elderly home to add to the congestion. Please do not let the Marja Acres
Project Development circumvent our Carlsbad General Plan. Our streets, schools and city services
will be even more strained, and it sends a message to the community that our quality of life is being
ignored. Please don't allow concessions or waivers in regards to development standards. We have
a resident approved Carlsbad General Plan. Please follow it. I am a Carlsbad Resident since the age
of 2 in 1975. It’s all I’ve known, and even though it isn’t what it was is all the more reason to
preserve what we can. I have to drive on El Camino Real between Carlsbad Village Drive and College
to go to work and to see my parents and family. It is disturbing and sad to think taking the freeway
may be faster.
Thanks,
Sarah Osborne
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
From:Jo Ann Sweeney
To:City Clerk; Council Internet Email; Planning
Subject:Marja Acres
Date:Thursday, October 29, 2020 12:58:15 PM
Dear Mayor, Council Members and Planning Commisioners:
Please do not approve the latest Marja Acres development proposal increase
to 296 dwelling units.
Instead enforce the maximum of 195 dwelling units on these 13 acres.
As you well know, the citizens of Carlsbad have spoken multiple times
regarding concerns about
planned development in Carlsbad. Citizens continue to review, fill out
surveys, provide input and continually reiterate:
Preserve the General Plan as previously enacted. Continue with balanced,
judicious planned growth, but keep Carlsbad with that small town feeling of
community.
The now 296 residential units planned for Marja Acres is too dense for the
area. The El Camino Real corridor is already impacted with excessive
traffic. Increased density in that area will cause additional stress to our
environment and increased safety concerns. With the reality of the increased
year long wildfire threat, we must remain vigilant to the safety of our
residents, fire personnel and first responders. Safe egress to communities
during fires, earthquakes, and other disasters should be a major concern of
developers and elected officials of any community. I appreciate the need and have always been a proponent of affordable
housing. Legislators in Sacramento state that affordable housing is one of the
main reasons for increasing density in all of California.
However, why not pursue affordable housing at the land already owned by
the city of Carlsbad at The Shoppes of Carlsbad. Mass transit with grocery,
banking, other assorted venues and employment opportunities are currently
available here without the use of a resident's vehicle?
The time is now to set the framework and strictly enforce current Carlsbad
General Plan guidelines for future developers coming to our beautiful city of
Carlsbad.
Respectfully,
JoAnn V. Sweeney
Carlsbad, Ca. 92008
23 year resident of Carlsbad, Ca.
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.
From:Faviola Medina
To:Melissa Flores
Subject:FW: Marja Acres - Agreements NUW made with our neighborhood
Date:Friday, October 30, 2020 9:32:05 AM
Attachments:image001.png
Faviola Medina, CMC
City Clerk Services Manager
Office of the City Clerk
P: 760-434-5989
From: Jeff Murphy <Jeff.Murphy@carlsbadca.gov>
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 9:31 AM
To: Teri Delcamp <Teri.Delcamp@carlsbadca.gov>; Don Neu <Don.Neu@carlsbadca.gov>; Faviola
Medina <Faviola.Medina@carlsbadca.gov>; Sheila Cobian <Sheila.Cobian@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: FW: Marja Acres - Agreements NUW made with our neighborhood
Teri/Don, FYI and for the file.
Faviola/Sheila, when is the cut off for adding these to the staff report (I assume soon, if not already).
JEFF
From: Scott Chadwick
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 9:27 AM
To: Geoff Patnoe <Geoff.Patnoe@carlsbadca.gov>; Jeff Murphy <Jeff.Murphy@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: FW: Marja Acres - Agreements NUW made with our neighborhood
For the file
Scott Chadwick
City Manager
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
www.carlsbadca.gov
. Cityof
Carlsbad
Facebook | Twitter | You Tube | Pinterest |Enews
From: Priya Bhat-Patel
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 6:45 AM
To: City Clerk <Clerk@carlsbadca.gov>
Cc: Celia Brewer <Celia.Brewer@carlsbadca.gov>; Scott Chadwick <Scott.Chadwick@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Marja Acres - Agreements NUW made with our neighborhood
Priya Bhat-Patel
Council Member, District 3
City of Carlsbad
1200 Carlsbad Village Dr.
Carlsbad, CA 92008
www.carlsbadca.gov
760-434-2830 (o)| 760-473-8726 (c)
priya.bhat-patel@carlsbadca.gov
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tracy Seemann <tracylingaas@sbcglobal.net>
Date: October 29, 2020 at 8:51:47 PM PDT
To: Priya Bhat-Patel <Priya.Bhat-Patel@carlsbadca.gov>
Subject: Marja Acres - Agreements NUW made with our neighborhood
Dear Councilwoman Bhat-Patel:
I live in Loma Lagnua, the neighborhood adjacent to Marja Acres'
southern border. Since the Spring of 2017, my neighbors and I have
worked with Jonathan Frankel of New Urban West (NUW) to address
and mitigate our privacy concerns. We held numerous neighborhood
gatherings with Jonathan. In response to our concerns, NUW agreed
to:
Remove the pedestrian connection that was originally proposed
i)
•
between Marja Acres and Park Drive
Eliminate the first and second rows of rooftop decks nearest our
Park Drive neighbors
Build a solid 6ft split faced masonry wall (rather than a wooden
fence) to buffer noise and light pollution
eliminate the optional roll-ups and carports on townhouses to insure
the two car garage was available for parking
eliminate optional kitchenettes from ground floor plans to discourage
rentals
lower the grading along our shared border to minimize the visual
impact of the townhouses
and incorporate neighbors landscaping preferences along our shared
border.
NUW made, and continues to make, a good faith effort to address ourprivacy concerns. My personal goal in helping facilitate these interactionswith NUW was to create a win-win. As long as the above agreements arekept, I support the project.
Although some of my neighbors and I still have concerns about the numberof housing units and the traffic impacts on the El Camino Real, that issomething the City Council members must address. Once Marja Acres andthe commercial areas of Robertson Ranch are built, it is likely that the leftturn lane at Kelly Drive and ECR will fail. Even one of the City PlanningCommissioners mentioned this during their discussions. The City needs tobe prepared to take care of this issue down the road. I encourage the Cityto be proactive and extend this left turn lane by narrowing the ECR medianPRIOR to the completion of Marja Acres and definitely before theRobinson Ranch commercial space is built out.
Lastly, I would like to ask that the City prohibit short term rentals inMarja Acres, as well as first story rental units in the townhouses (due tolimited parking and noise concerns). Perhaps these last two requests couldbe addressed in the CC&R's.
Sincerely,
Tracy Seemann
Tracy Seemann
Carlsbad, CA 92008
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you
recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
•
•
•
•
•
•