HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-06-06; City Council; Resolution 2023-143RESOLUTION NO. 2023-143
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD,
CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY LOCAL AGENCY
FORMATION COMMISSION TO HOLD PROCEEDINGS FOR THE LEUCADIA
WASTEWATER DISTRICT CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION DETACHMENT AND
DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE CITY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE TO SIGN
THE APPLICATION AND OTHER DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has determined that it desires to
initiate proceedings pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of
2000, California Government Code Section 56000 et seq., for a proposed Change of Organization for
detachment of certain areas within city limits from the Leucadia Wastewater District, or Leucadia,
wastewater service area; and
WHEREAS, those areas are indicated along with the application in Attachment A; and
WHEREAS, in some cases, service areas were established before development needs were
known; and
WHEREAS, as development in parts of the City of Carlsbad has occurred, the city has provided
wastewater collection services within the Leucadia Wastewater District service area due to the city's
existing infrastructure; and
WHEREAS, Leucadia Wastewater District has no plans to extend wastewater collection facilities
to serve these areas and supports the detachment in order to revise the approved service area
boundary; and
WHEREAS, the San Diego County Local Agency Formation Commission, or LAFCO, is authorized
to initiate proceedings for this proposed Change of Organization without a petition of landowners or
registered voters upon approval by the City Council and certified Resolution approving the LAFCO
application; and
WHEREAS, the City Planner has reviewed this proposed Change of Organization under the
California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, and has determined it to be categorically exempt from
CEQA pursuant to Section 15319 (a) because the annexation of existing private structures is consistent
with the city's General Plan and there is no planned development in the subject areas inconsistent with
the city's General Plan; and
WHEREAS, a copy of the CEQA exemption will be retained in the Utilities Department file and
filed with the San Diego County to serve as verification of the City Planner's evaluation and the record
of the CEQA environmental determination.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as
follows:
1.That the above recitations are true and correct.
2.That the San Diego County Local Agency Formation Commission is requested to start
proceedings for the proposed Change of Organization that includes the territories
described in Attachment A, according to the terms and conditions stated above and, in
a manner, provided by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization
Act of 2000.
3.That the City Manager or designee is delegated authority to sign the application and
other documents necessary to complete the Change of Organization.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of
Carlsbad on the 6th day of June, 2023, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Bhat-Patel, Acosta, Burkholder, Luna.
None.
Blackburn.
None.
KEITH BLACKBURN, Mayor
� �-SHERRY FREISINGER, City Clerk r -(SEAL)
SAN DIEGO LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
9335 Hazard Way · Suite 200 · San Diego, CA 92123
(858)614-7755 · www. sdlafco.org
Updated: September 3, 2019
S AN D IEGO L OCAL A GENCY F ORMATION C OMMISSION
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION APPLICATION
The following information must be submitted when filing a change of organization or
reorganization proposal with the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO);
additional information may be requested during review of the proposal.
1. Completed CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION APPLICATION.
2. (a) A certified resolution of application from an affected city or district; or
(b) A landowner or registered voter petition making application to San Diego LAFCO
(available from LAFCO or http://www.sdlafco.org/forms/petition.pdf).
3. A metes-and-bounds legal description of the proposal territory perimeter for the proposed
boundary change(s), a reproducible parcel/plat map, and a vicinity map. For information about
mapping requirements, refer to: http://www.sdlafco.org/forms/legal_description.pdf, and contact the
County Assessor’s Mapping Division at 619/531-5588. The Thomas Brother’s Guide may be used for
the vicinity map.
4. Environmental documentation to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
submit documents for applicable category only:
(a)INITIAL STUDY: Submit completed form (available from LAFCO) if no environmental review has
been conducted;
(b)CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: Submit document if an agency has certified that the project qualifies for
a categorical exemption from CEQA;
(c)NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ND): Submit document with certifying resolution and Initial Study*;
(d)ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR): Submit 15 copies of the Final EIR and certifying resolution, plus
one copy of the EIR Appendix*.
*For an ND or EIR, a copy of the receipt for the fee paid to the California Department of Fish and Game must be submitted.
5. If annexation to a city is proposed, submit one copy of the city resolution approving prezoning
and general plan land-use designations for the proposal territory.
6. JURISDICTIONAL CONFLICTS: If the response to question number 6 on page 3 is “Yes”, complete and
sign the Policy L-107 form at http://www.sdlafco.org/forms/Legislative_Policy_L_107.pdf.
7. Completed CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE FORM AND EVALUATION CHECKLIST for DISCLOSURE OF
POLITICAL EXPENDITURES (pages 7 and 8 of application).
8. PROPERTY-OWNER CONSENT FORM FOR INCLUSION OF PROPERTY (page 9 of application).
9. Completed SUBJECT AGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (pages 10-12 of application) from each
subject agency.
10. LAFCO processing fees. The San Diego LAFCO FEE SCHEDULE is available at
http://www.sdlafco.org/document/feeschedule.pdf, or contact LAFCO staff.
ATTACHMENT A
Page 2 of 12
CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION OR REORGANIZATION APPLICATION
The information in this application is used by LAFCO staff to evaluate proposals for changes of government
organization. Please respond to all items in this form, indicating “NA” when an item does not apply.
SUBJECT
AGENCY(IES)
(City or Special District)
PROPOSED CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION/ACTION
(Annexation, detachment, sphere amendment, etc.)
1.______________________________ 1. _______________________________________
2.______________________________ 2. __________________________________________
3.______________________________ 3. __________________________________________
4.______________________________ 4. __________________________________________
As part of this application, the City of ________________ or the _______________________ District, ____________________________(the applicant), and/or the __________________________ (real party in interest): subject landowner and/or registered voter agrees to defend, indemnify, hold harmless, and release the San
Diego LAFCO, its agents, officers, attorneys, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding brought against
any or all of them, the purpose of which is to attack, set aside, void, or annul San Diego LAFCO’s review, approval or
denial of this application or adoption of or refusal to adopt the environmental document which accompanies it or any
other action San Diego LAFCO takes with respect to this application. This defense and indemnification obligation shall
include, but not be limited to, attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees and other costs of defense, damages, costs, and
expenses, including attorney fees payable to another party. Applicant and/or real party in interest agree that San
Diego LAFCO shall have the right to appoint its own counsel to defend it and conduct its own defense in the manner it deems in its best interest and that San Diego LAFCO’s taking such action does not limit the obligations to indemnify and reimburse San Diego LAFCO’s defense costs. This defense and indemnification obligation shall apply whether or
not there is concurrent passive or active negligence on the part of the San Diego LAFCO, its agents, officers,
attorneys, or employee. The person signing this application will be considered the proponent for the proposed
action(s) and will receive all related notices and other communications. San Diego LAFCO’s acceptance of this
application is sufficient to make this agreement a binding, bilateral contract between us.
I acknowledge that annexation to the city of _______________________ or the
________________________district may result in the imposition of taxes, fees and assessments
existing within the (city or district) on the effective date of annexation. I hereby waive any rights I may have under Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the State Constitution (Proposition 218) to a hearing, assessment ballot proceeding or an election on those existing taxes, fees and assessments.
Agreed:
Signature: _______________________________________________Date: ________________________
Print/Type Name: ___________________________________________________________________________
Address: ____________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________Telephone: ( ) _______________
Property Address: _____________________________________________________________________
Cross Street(s): _______________________________________________________________________
Assessor Parcel Number(s): ____________________________________Acres: _____________________
Indicate below if anyone, in addition to the person signing this application, is to receive notices of these proceedings.
Name: ______________________________________________________________________________
Address: _____________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________Telephone: ( ) _______________
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 12
A.PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION/JUSTIFICATION
1.Explain in detail why the proposal is necessary at this time (e.g., condition of an approved tentative
map, an existing structure requires new services, etc.). ______________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
2.Describe the use of developed property within the proposal territory, including details about existing
structures. Describe anticipated development of vacant property, including types of buildings, number
of units, supporting facilities, etc., and when development is scheduled to occur. __________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
3.Describe the topography and physical features of the proposal territory, as well as its general
location in relation to communities, major freeways/highways, roads, etc. ______________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
4.How many residents live within the proposal territory? ______________________________________
5.How many of these residents are registered voters? ________________________________________
6.Are there any jurisdictional issues associated with the LAFCO proposal or pending LAFCO action?
□NO □ YES (If yes, please complete the Policy L-107 form at
http://www.sdlafco.org/forms/Legislative_Policy_L_107.pdf)
B.LAND USE INFORMATION
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING:
If the proposal territory is not within an incorporated city, San Diego County General Plan and zoning information may be obtained by calling (858) 565-5981 or toll-free (888) 267-8770 with the Assessor
Parcel Number(s) of the subject property. If the proposal territory is within a city, please call the
appropriate city’s planning department for General Plan and zoning information.
1.COUNTY:
(a) The territory is within the _____________________________________________ community plan.
(b) The County General Plan or community plan designation and allowed density: ________________
________________________________________________________________________________
(c) Current County zoning and allowed density: ___________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
June 6, 2023
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 12
2.CITY:
(a) The territory is within the general plan area for the City of _______________________________
(b) The City General Plan land use designation and allowed density: __________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
(c) Current City zoning and allowed density: _____________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
(d) Current City prezoning and allowed density: __________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
3.Indicate below all permits or approvals that will be needed by the County or any city to complete theproject. If already granted, please note the date of approval and attach a copy of each resolution ofapproval. If approval is pending, please note the anticipated approval date.
Type of Approval or Permit File No. Approval Date
Is Resolution
Attached?
Tentative Subdivision Map YES NO
Tentative Parcel Map YES NO
Major Use Permit YES NO
City/County General Plan Amendment YES NO
City Prezoning YES NO
County Rezone YES NO
(Other) YES NO
4.Describe the land uses surrounding the proposal territory (e.g., residential, commercial, agricultural, industrial, open space, etc.).
North: ________________________________________East:_________________________________
South: ________________________________________West:________________________________
5.Indicate with a if any portion of the proposal territory contains the following:
_____Agricultural land uses _____Agricultural Preserve
_____Open Space Easement _____Slopes greater than 25%
_____Sewer moratorium area _____Coastal Permit Zone
_____Unusual features such as:________________________________________________________
6.For city annexation proposals: Is any part of the proposal territory under a
Williamson Act contract? If yes, please contact the LAFCO office for special
instructions regarding petition/resolution of application requirements.
YES NO
June 6, 2023
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 5 of 12
C.PUBLIC SERVICES INFORMATION
SEWER SERVICE:
1.(a) Is the proposal territory within a district or city that provides public sewer
service?
(b)If yes, which agency? _______________________________________________
YES NO
2.(a) Is a developed parcel in need of annexation due to failed septic system?
(b)If yes, include a copy of any letters from the San Diego County Department ofEnvironmental Health or private septic-system company.
(c)If no, is annexation for sewer service part of this application?
YES NO
YES NO
3.If annexation for sewer service is proposed, which district or city would serve theterritory if this jurisdictional change is approved? ____________________________
4.(a) Has the agency that will be providing service issued a letter of seweravailability?
(b)If yes, please provide a copy of the letter with this application. (Thisdocumentation should be completed by the agency no longer than 6 months prior tosubmittal to LAFCO.)
YES NO
5.(a) Will the agency be prepared to furnish sewer service upon annexation?
(b)If no, please explain:________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
YES NO
WATER SERVICE:
1.(a) Is the proposal territory within a district or city that provides public water
service?
(b)If yes, which agency? _______________________________________________
YES NO
2.Is a well or other on-site water system currently used on the property?YES NO
3.Is an on-site system proposed to be used when the property is developed?YES NO
4.(a) Is annexation for water service part of this application?
(b)If yes, which district or city would serve the territory if this jurisdictional change is
approved? __________________________________________________________
(c) Will the agency that will be providing service be prepared to furnish water
service upon annexation?
YES NO
YES NO
5.(a) Has the agency that will be providing service issued a letter of water
availability?
(b)If yes, please provide a copy of the letter with this application. (This
documentation should be completed by the agency no longer than 6 months prior to
submittal to LAFCO.)
YES NO
June 6, 2023
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 6 of 12
FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES: NOTE: Complete the following section only if annexation
to a fire protection service provider is proposed—or if the current fire protection
service provider is proposed to change.
1.(a) Is the proposal territory currently within an agency that provides fire protection?
(b)If yes, provide name and address/location of current fire service provider
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
(c) Provide estimated response times to the proposal territory:
priority_______ minutes; non-priority_______ minutes
YES NO
2.Is annexation for fire protection service part of this application?YES NO
3.Which city or district would serve the proposal territory if this jurisdictional change is
approved?
___________________________________________________________________
(a) Location/address of the proposed fire service provider: ___________________
___________________________________________________________________
(b) Estimated response times to the proposal territory:
Priority______ minutes; non-priority______ minutes
POLICE PROTECTION SERVICES: NOTE: Complete the following section only if the police protection
provider is proposed to change.
1.Which police agency currently serves the proposal territory?
_________________________________________________________________________________
(a) Location/address of nearest police station: ____________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
(b) Estimated response times to the proposal territory: priority____ minutes; non-priority____ minutes
2.Which police agency would serve the proposal territory if this jurisdictional change is approved?
_________________________________________________________________________________
(a) Location/address of nearest police station:____________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
(b) Estimated response times to the proposal territory:
Priority______ minutes; non-priority______ minutes
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 7 of 12
CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS
LAFCOs are subject to the campaign disclosure
provisions detailed in Government Code Section 84308, and the Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC), Section 18438.
Please carefully read the following information to determine if the provisions apply to you. If you determine that the provisions are applicable, the Campaign Disclosure Form must be completed and
returned to San Diego LAFCO with your application.
1.No LAFCO commissioner shall accept, solicit, ordirect a contribution of more than $250 from anyparty1 or agent2 while a change of organization
proceeding is pending, and for three monthssubsequent to the date a final decision is rendered by
LAFCO. This prohibition commences when yourapplication has been filed, or the proceeding isotherwise initiated.
2.A party to a LAFCO proceeding shall disclose onthe record of the proceeding any contribution of morethan $250 made to any commissioner by the party, or
agent, during the preceding 12 months. No party to aLAFCO proceeding, or agent, shall make a
contribution to a commissioner during the proceedingand for three months following the date a final decisionis rendered by LAFCO.
3.Prior to rendering a decision on a LAFCOproceeding, any commissioner who received
contribution of more than $250 within the preceding
12 months from any party, or agent, to a proceedingshall disclose that fact on the record of the proceeding,
and shall be disqualified from participating in theproceeding. However, if any commissioner receives acontribution that otherwise would require
disqualification, and returns the contribution within 30days of knowing about the contribution and therelevant proceeding, that commissioner shall be
permitted to participate in the proceeding.
1 “Party” is defined as any person who files an application for, or is the subject of, a proceeding.
2 “Agent” is defined as a person who represents a
party in connection with a proceeding. If an individual
acting as an agent also is acting as an employee or
member of a law, architectural, engineering, or
consulting firm, or a similar entity or corporation, both
the individual and the entity or corporation are agents. When a closed corporation is a party to a proceeding,
the majority shareholder is subject to these provisions.
To determine whether a campaign contribution of more than $250 has been made by you or your agent to a
commissioner within the preceding 12 months, all contributions made by you or your agent during that
period must be aggregated.
Names of current LAFCO commissioners are available
at http://www.sdlafco.org/document/CommRoster.pdf. If you have questions about Government Code Section
84308, FPPC regulations, or the Campaign Disclosure Form, please contact San Diego LAFCO at 9335
Hazard Way, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 614-7755.
CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE FORM
(a) Proposed change(s) of organization: ________
___________________________________
___________________________________
(b)Name and address of any party, or agent, who hascontributed more than $250 to any commissioner within
the preceding 12 months:
1.__________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
2.__________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________
(c) Date and amount of contribution:
Date __________________ Amount $ _____________
Date __________________ Amount $ _____________
(d) Name of commissioner to whom contribution was
made:
1.__________________________________
2.__________________________________
(e)I certify that the above information is provided to
the best of my knowledge.
Printed Name ___________________________
Signature ______________________________
Date __________________ Phone ________________
To be completed by LAFCO:
Proposal:
Ref. No.
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 8 of 12
DISCLOSURE OF POLITICAL EXPENDITURES
Effective January 1, 2008, expenditures for
political purposes, which are related to a change
of organization or reorganization proposal that
will be or has been submitted to LAFCO, are
subject to the reporting and disclosure
requirements of the Political Reform Act of
1974 and the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act of
2000.
Please carefully read the following
information to determine if reporting and
disclosure provisions apply to you.
Any person or combination of persons
who, for political purposes, directly or
indirectly contributes $1,000 or more, or
expend $1,000 or more in support of, or in
opposition to a proposal for a change of
organization or reorganization that will be
submitted to the Commission, shall disclose
and report to the Commission to the same
extent and subject to the same
requirements of the Political Reform Act
of 1974 (Government Code Section 81000
et seq.) as provided for local initiative
measures, and Section 56700.1 of the
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act of 2000.
Pursuant to Government Code Section
57009, any person or combination of
persons who directly or indirectly
contributes $1,000 or more, or expends
$1,000 or in support of, or in opposition
to, the conducting authority proceedings
for a change of organization or
reorganization, must comply with the
disclosure requirements of the Political
Reform Act of 1974, (Government Code
section 81000 et seq.). Applicable reports
must be filed with the Secretary of State
and the appropriate city or county clerk.
Copies of the report must also be filed
with the Executive Officer of San Diego
LAFCO.
A roster of current San Diego LAFCO commissioners is
available from the LAFCO office: 9335 Hazard Way, Suite 200,San Diego, CA 92123, (858) 614-7755, or fromhttp://www.sdlafco.org/document/CommRoster.pdf
EVALUATION CHECKLIST FOR DISCLOSURE OF
POLITICAL EXPENDITURES
The following checklist is provided to assist
you in determining if the requirements of Government Code Sections 81000 et seq.
apply to you. For further assistance contact the Fair Political Practices Commission at 428 J
Street, Suite 450, Sacramento, CA 95814, (866) 275-3772 or at http://www.fppc.ca.gov.
1.Have you directly or indirectly made a
contribution or expenditure of $1,000 or
more related to the support or opposition
of a proposal that has been or will be
submitted to LAFCO?
Yes
No
Date of contribution____________________ Amount $ _________
Name/Ref. No. of LAFCO proposal _________________________
____________________________________________________
Date proposal submitted to LAFCO _________________________
2.Have you, in combination with other
person(s), directly or indirectly contributed
or expended $1,000 or more related to
the support or opposition of a proposal
that has been or will be submitted to
LAFCO?
Yes
No
Date of contribution____________________ Amount $ _________
Name/Ref. No. of LAFCO proposal _________________________
____________________________________________________
Date proposal submitted to LAFCO _________________________
3.If you have filed a report in accordance
with FPPC requirements, has a copy of the
report been filed with San Diego LAFCO?
Yes
No
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 9 of 12
PROPERTY-OWNER CONSENT FORM FOR INCLUSION OF PROPERTY
Note: Processing of jurisdictional boundary change proposals, which involve uninhabited1 territory,
can be expedited by approximately 60 days if all affected landowners consent to the proposal.
If you wish to take advantage of this option, please return the completed PROPERTY-OWNER CONSENT
FORM FOR INCLUSION OF PROPERTY to San Diego LAFCO with your application for a jurisdictional boundary
change. If consenting signatures of 100% of the affected property owners are affixed and
LAFCO does not receive any opposition from subject agencies, the Commission may consider the
proposal without public notice, public hearing and/or an election.
1 Territory included within a proposed boundary change that includes less-than12
registered voters is considered uninhabited (Government Code 56045).
The undersigned owners(s) of property hereby consent(s) to inclusion of that property within a
proposed change of organization or reorganization consisting of:
(Please list all proposed actions)
Annexation to: 1. ______________________________________________________________
2. ______________________________________________________________
3. ______________________________________________________________
Detachment from: 1.______________________________________________________________
2. ______________________________________________________________
3. ______________________________________________________________
Date Signature Assessor’s Parcel Number(s)
1.____________________________________________________________________________
2.____________________________________________________________________________
3.____________________________________________________________________________
4.____________________________________________________________________________
5.____________________________________________________________________________
Attach additional sheets if necessary
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 10 of 12
SUBJECT AGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
NOTE: A copy of this form must be completed and signed by each local agency that will gain or lose territory
as a result of the proposed jurisdictional boundary change. Attach additional sheets if necessary.
_____________________________________ _____________________________________________ Signature of agency representative Print name
_____________________________________________________________________________________ Title
_____________________________________ _____________________________________________
Telephone Date
A.JURISDICTIONAL INFORMATION:
Name of agency: ____________________________________________________________________
1.Is the proposal territory within the agency’s sphere of influence?Yes No
2.Upon annexation, will the proposal territory be included within an assessment district
and be subject to assessment for new or extended services?
Yes No
3.Does the agency have plans to establish any new assessment district that would
include the proposal territory?
Yes No
4.Will the proposal territory assume any existing bonded indebtedness?
If yes, indicate any taxpayer cost: $_______________________________________
Yes No
5.Will the proposal territory be subject to any special taxes, benefit charges, or fees?
If yes, please provide details of all costs: ___________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Yes No
6.Is the agency requesting an exchange of property tax revenues as a result of this
proposal?
Yes No
7.Is this proposed jurisdictional change subject to a master property tax agreement or
master enterprise district resolution?
Yes No
8.FOR CITY ANNEXATIONS: Does the proposal territory contain existing commercial
development that generates retail sales of ten million dollars or more per year?
Yes No
9.FOR CITY ANNEXATIONS: If any part of the proposal territory is under a Williamson
Act contract, please contact the LAFCO office for special instructions regarding
petition or resolution of application requirements.
EXPEDITED PROPOSAL PROCESSING: Processing of jurisdictional boundary change proposals can be
expedited by approximately 60 days if all affected landowners consent to the waiver of protest and
termination (conducting authority) proceedings and subject agencies do not oppose the waiver. If you do
NOT want to waive these proceedings, then attach a written statement to the subject agency information
form containing a signature, date, and declaration of opposition to a waiver of such proceedings.
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 11 of 12
B.SEWER SERVICE:
1.What is the agency’s current wastewater treatment capacity (expressed in million
gallons per day and equivalent dwelling units)? _____________________________
___________________________________________________________________
2.What is the average volume of influent currently being treated by the agency
(expressed in million gallons per day and equivalent dwelling units)? ____________
___________________________________________________________________
3.(a) What is the agency’s peak flow volume (expressed in million gallons per day)?
__________________________________________________________________
(b)What is the agency’s peak flow capacity (expressed in million gallons per day)?___________________________________________________________________
(c)Has the agency exceeded the flow (peak) capacity within the past two years?
(d)If yes, please describe the frequency and volume of incidents that exceeded the
agency’s peak capacity: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
YES NO
4.(a) Has the agency issued a letter of sewer availability for the proposal territory?
(b)If yes, please provide a copy of the letter. (This documentation should becompleted by the agency no longer than 6 months prior to submittal to LAFCO.)
YES NO
5.(a) How many future equivalent dwelling units have been reserved or committed forproposed projects? __________________________________________________
(b)Can all projects that have received commitments of sewer availability (e.g., “will
serve letters”) be accommodated with planned capacity?YES NO
6.(a) Does the agency have the necessary contractual and/or operational treatment
capacity to provide sewer service to the proposal territory?
(b)If yes, please specify the proposal territory ’s estimated sewer demand and the
agency’s available sewer capacity (expressed in million gallons per day and
equivalent dwelling units):
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
(c)If no, please describe the agency’s plans to upgrade capacity to resolve any
capacity related issues: _________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
YES NO
7.Will the proposal territory be annexed to a sewer improvement district?YES NO
8.(a) The distance for connection of the proposal territory to the agency’s existing
sewer system is __________ feet.
(b)Describe the location of the connection to the agency’s existing sewer system:
___________________________________________________________________
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 12 of 12
C.WATER SERVICE:
1.(a) Does the subject agency have adequate water supply and sufficient contractualand/or operational capacity available to serve the proposal territory?
(b)If yes, describe the proposal territory’s estimated water demand and the agency’savailable water supply and capacity (expressed in acre-feet or million gallons perday):___________________________________________________________________
(c)If no, what plans does the agency have to increase its water capacity?___________________________________________________________________
YES NO
2.Specify any improvements (on and off-site) that will be necessary to connect andserve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these improvements and
method of financing (e.g., general property tax, assessment district, landowner or
developer fees): ______________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
YES NO
3.(a) Has the agency issued a letter of water availability for the proposal territory?
(b)If yes, please provide a copy of the letter. (This documentation should be
completed by the agency no longer than 6 months prior to submittal to LAFCO.)
YES NO
4.(a) The distance for connection of the proposal territory to the agency’s existing
water system is _____________feet.
(b) Describe the location of the connection to the agency’s existing water system:
___________________________________________________________________
5.(a) Is the agency currently under any drought-related conditions and/or restrictions?
(b)If yes, describe the conditions and specify any related restrictions:
___________________________________________________________________
YES NO
6.(a) Will the proposal territory utilize reclaimed water?
(b)If yes, describe the proposal territory’s reclaimed water use and the agency’s
available reclaimed water supply and capacity (expressed in acre-feet or million
gallons per day):
___________________________________________________________________
(c)The distance for connection of the proposal territory to the agency’s existing
reclaimed water system is _____________feet.
(d)Describe the location of the connection to the agency’s existing reclaimed water
system:_____________________________________________________________
(e)If no, has the agency considered availability of reclaimed water to the proposal
territory?
(f)What restrictions prevent use of reclaimed water? _________________________
___________________________________________________________________
YES NO
YES NO
7.Will the proposal territory be annexed to an improvement district?YES NO
SUBJECT AGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
NOTE: A copy of this form must be completed and signed by each local agency that will gain or lose territory
t of the pr sed jurisdictional boundary change. Attach additional sheets if necessary.
Kathleen Heitt
Signature ol agency representative Print name
District Engineer
Title
760-438-4422 1/20/2023
Telephone Date
A. JURISDICTIONAL INFORMATION:
Name of agency:
Leucadia Wastewater District
l. Is the proposal territory within the agency's sphere of influence?
2. Upon annexation, will the proposal territory be included within an assessment district
and be subject to assessment for new or extended services?
3. Does the agency have plans to establish any new assessment district that would
include the proposal territory?
4. Will the proposal territory assume any existing bonded indebtedness?
II yes, indicate any taxpayer cost: $ __________________ _
5. Will the proposal territory be subject to any special taxes, benefit charges, or fees?
II yes, please provide details of all costs: ________________ _
6. Is the agency requesting an exchange of property tax revenues as a result of this
proposal?
7. Is this proposed jurisdictional change subject to a master property tax agreement or
master enterprise district resolution?
8. FOR CITY ANNEXATIONS: Does the proposal territory contain existing commercial
development that generates retail sales of ten million dollars or more per year?
9. FOR CITY ANNEXATIONS: If any part of the proposal territory is under a Williamson
Act contract, please contact the LAFCO office for special instructions regarding
petition or resolution of application requirements.
YesEI NoO
YesO No□ N/A
YesD NoO N/A
Yes(J No□ N/ A
YesO NoO N/A
YesD NoO N/A
YesO NoO N/A
YeCI NoO N/A
EXPEDITED PROPOSAL PROCESSING: Processing of jurisdictional boundary change proposals can be
expedited by approximately 60 days if all affected landowners consent to the waiver of protest and
termination (conducting authority) proceedings and subject agencies do not oppose the waiver. If you do
NOT want to waive these proceedings, then attach a written statement to the subject agency information
form containing a signature, date, and declaration of opposition to a waiver of such proceedings.
SAN DIEGO LAFCO-CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page l O of 12
SAN DIEGO LAFCO—CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION or REORGANIZATION APPLICATION Page 12 of 12
C.WATER SERVICE:
1.(a) Does the subject agency have adequate water supply and sufficient contractualand/or operational capacity available to serve the proposal territory?
(b)If yes, describe the proposal territory’s estimated water demand and the agency’savailable water supply and capacity (expressed in acre-feet or million gallons perday):___________________________________________________________________
(c)If no, what plans does the agency have to increase its water capacity?___________________________________________________________________
YES NO
2.Specify any improvements (on and off-site) that will be necessary to connect andserve the anticipated development. Indicate the total cost of these improvements and
method of financing (e.g., general property tax, assessment district, landowner or
developer fees): ______________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
YES NO
3.(a) Has the agency issued a letter of water availability for the proposal territory?
(b)If yes, please provide a copy of the letter. (This documentation should be
completed by the agency no longer than 6 months prior to submittal to LAFCO.)
YES NO
4.(a) The distance for connection of the proposal territory to the agency’s existing
water system is _____________feet.
(b) Describe the location of the connection to the agency’s existing water system:
___________________________________________________________________
5.(a) Is the agency currently under any drought-related conditions and/or restrictions?
(b)If yes, describe the conditions and specify any related restrictions:
___________________________________________________________________
YES NO
6.(a) Will the proposal territory utilize reclaimed water?
(b)If yes, describe the proposal territory’s reclaimed water use and the agency’s
available reclaimed water supply and capacity (expressed in acre-feet or million
gallons per day):
___________________________________________________________________
(c)The distance for connection of the proposal territory to the agency’s existing
reclaimed water system is _____________feet.
(d)Describe the location of the connection to the agency’s existing reclaimed water
system:_____________________________________________________________
(e)If no, has the agency considered availability of reclaimed water to the proposal
territory?
(f)What restrictions prevent use of reclaimed water? _________________________
___________________________________________________________________
YES NO
YES NO
7.Will the proposal territory be annexed to an improvement district?YES NO
Page 1 of 3
DETACHMENT NO.
DETACHMENT FROM THE LEUCADIA WASTEWATER DISTRICT
GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 214-150-19
214-160-04, 05, 06, 25, 27, 28, 34, 35, 36, 37, 37 AND 39216-140-08
THAT PORTION OF FRACTIONAL SECTIONS 29, 32 AND 33, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST,
SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 33 AS SHOWN ON
RECORD OF SURVEY 20809 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 22, 2010 AS FILE NO: 2010-0504205 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE (1) SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 SOUTH 00°39’07” WEST 2339.18 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT 3.04 ACRE
PARCEL SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 6561 RECORDED JULY 13, 1965 AS FILE NO. 124950 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE (2) SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY SOUTH 17°17’45” EAST 279.88 FEET
TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF LAFCO “BATIQUITOS POINTE REORGANIZATION” RESOLUTION NO. 7623 ADOPTED JULY 12, 1984, BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE MEAN HIGH TIDE LINE AND
THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 6 OF SAID SECTION 33 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 6561 AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE (3) ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 7623 AND THE SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID 3.04 ACRE PARCEL AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809 AND
THE EASTERLY EXTENSION THEREOF NORTH 61°02’02” EAST 474.95 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809;
THENCE (4) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 7623 AND
SAID EASTERLY LINE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD NORTH 16°50’00” WEST 1414.99 FEET TO AN
ANGLE POINT IN SAID EASTERLY LINE ALSO BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AS ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE NO. 1084 ADOPTED NOVEMBER 19, 1963;
THENCE (5) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 7623, SAID BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND SAID EASTERLY LINE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD
NORTH 03°59’30” WEST 663.24 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, BEING THE EASTERLY END OF LINE L3 SHOWN ON SHEET 4 OF SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809;
THENCE (6) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 7623, SAID
BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809 SOUTH 86°00’30”
WEST 177.99 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 6,280.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO WHICH BEARS NORTH
67°55’50” EAST;
Page 2 of 3
THENCE (7) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 7623, SAID
BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809, NORTHERLY
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°00’20” AN ARC DISTANCE OF 219.82 FEET;
THENCE (8) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 7623, SAID
BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD AND SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809 NORTH 24°05’17”
WEST 164.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 339 (PONTO DRIVE);
THENCE (9) LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CONTINUING ALONG SAID
WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 7623, SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809 AND THE
EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809 SOUTH 89°04’24” EAST 307.62 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE ABANDON PORTION OF THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND
SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY’S RIGHT OF WAY ACROSS THE SOUTH TWO THIRDS OF LOT 4 OF SAID SECTION 29 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 682 RECORDED JULY 28, 1938 AS FILE NO. 38625 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY AND THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE ABANDON RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 12926 RECORDED OCTOBER 11, 1990 AS FILE NO. 90-556712 IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE (10) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 7623 AND SAID EASTERLY LINE OF THE ABANDON PORTION OF THE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE
ABANDON RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 12926 NORTH 03°59’30” WEST 826.11 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE EXISTING
200.00 FOOT WIDE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN ON SAID ROS 12926;
THENCE (11) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 7623 AND SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE EXISTING 200.00 FOOT WIDE ATCHISON TOPEKA AND
SANTA FE RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY NORTH 20°35’22” WEST 194.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTHERLY ONE THIRD OF LOT 4 OF SAID SECTION 29 AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY 13326 RECORDED AUGUST 2, 1991 AS FILE NO. 91-387218 IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, BEING AN ANGLE POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF LAFCO “H.B. DEVELOPMENT DETACHMENT” RESOLUTION NO. 337 ADOPTED NOVEMBER 12, 1970;
THENCE (12) LEAVING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 7623, ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 337 AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE
NORTHERLY ONE THIRD OF LOT 4 OF SAID SECTION 29 NORTH 89°09’28” WEST 565.38 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809;
THENCE (13) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 337 AND
ALONG SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809 NORTH 19°08’54” WEST 3174.34 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 19,846.00 FEET;
THENCE (14) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 337 AND SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809, NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 0°22’36” AN ARC DISTANCE OF 130.47 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 29 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 682 AND AN ANGLE POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF LAFCO “DEANNEXATION NO. 3” RESOLUTION NO. 407 ADOPTED DECEMBER 14, 1972;
THENCE (15) LEAVING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 337, ALONG SAID
WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 407, CONTINUING ALONG SAID RECORD OF SURVEY
20809 AND SAID 19,846.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°41’34” AN ARC DISTANCE OF 239.96 FEET;
Page 3 of 3
THENCE (16) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 407 AND
SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809 NORTH 18°05’07” WEST 1172.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET;
THENCE (17) CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 407 AND SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809, NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE
OF 108°44’28” AN ARC DISTANCE OF 37.96 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 OF SAID
SECTION 29 BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 29 AS SHOWN ON SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809 AND THE NORTH LINE OF PARCEL A OF “INCLUSION NO. 1 TO THE LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT” PER LAFCO ORDINANCE 2 ADOPTED JANUARY 23, 1961;
THENCE (18) LEAVING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF RESOLUTION NO. 407, ALONG SAID
NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL A AND SAID RECORD OF SURVEY 20809 NORTH 89°20’39” WEST
567.41 FEET TO THE MEAN HIGH TIDE LINE OF THE PACIFIC OCEAN;
THENCE (19) CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARCEL A, SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH TIDE
LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, A TIE LINE TO WHICH BEARS SOUTH 19°15’11” EAST 8572.62 FEET.
CONTAINING 107.00 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DESCRIPTION OF LAND IS NOT A LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AS DEFINED IN THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND MAY NOT BE USED AS THE BASIS FOR AN OFFER FOR SALE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED.
THIS REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT.
______________________________________ MICHAEL L. SCHLUMPBERGER, PLS 7790
January 12, 2023_____________________ DATE
~~
C
r
l
Q
A
c
l
p
"
i
"I
(
~ ~
I
Q ~ ~
n
V)
0 ~I
v
-
-
/
'
1
\
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
AR
E
A
OF
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
FR
O
M
LE
U
C
A
D
I
A
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
DIS
T
R
I
C
T
10
7
.
0
0
AC
R
E
S
DIS
C
L
A
I
M
E
R
:
"F
O
R
AS
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
PU
R
P
O
S
E
S
ON
L
Y
.
TH
I
S
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
OF
LA
N
D
IS
NO
T
A
LE
G
A
L
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
AS
DE
F
I
N
E
D
IN
TH
E
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
MA
P
AC
T
AN
D
MA
Y
NO
T
BE
US
E
D
AS
TH
E
BA
S
I
S
FO
R
AN
OF
F
E
R
FO
R
SA
L
E
OF
TH
E
LA
N
D
DE
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
"
I
C
f
A
N
0
,,
~
!
f
/
>
::
0
~
::
0
,,
l6
-I
::0
cA
f
<
1
,
.
s
B
A
D
~ ~ or
~
Ii!
~
:.;
;
~
~"
'
1-
.
.
$1
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
MA
P
NO
SC
A
L
E
SH
E
E
T
1
OF
4
AS
S
E
S
S
O
R
'
S
PA
R
C
E
L
NU
M
B
E
R
S
I LA
F
C
O
RE
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
NO
.
I AC
R
E
A
G
E
ID
A
TE
SC
A
L
E
21
4
-
1
5
0
-
1
9
,
21
6
-
1
4
0
-
0
8
21
4
-
1
6
0
-
0
4
10
116
&
25
.
'E
l
.
28
.
34
10
J9
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
BO
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
BE
I
N
G
A
PO
R
T
I
O
N
OF
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
29
,
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
32
AN
D
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
33
,
T1
2
S
,
R4
W
,
SB
M
,
SA
N
DIE
G
O
CO
U
N
T
Y
10
7
.
0
0
12
/
2
1
/
2
0
2
2
Ri
g
h
t
-
O
f
-
W
a
y
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
In
c
.
81
5
So
u
t
h
Tr
e
m
o
n
t
st
r
e
e
t
•
0c
n
D
a
l
d
e
,
Cl
92
0
5
'
ww
e
,
o
w
.
.
,
.
.
.
i
e
t
(7
8
0
)
83
7
-
2
7
0
0
Dr
a
w
i
n
g
fi
e
na
m
e
:
Cc
r
l
s
b
a
d
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
De
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
Jo
b
No
.
22
1
1
-
0
0
J
6
-
0
7
....
i
21
4
-
1
6
0
-
•
•
~~
t·
v
CO
R
N
E
R
OF
SE
C
T
I
O
N
33
A.
T.
&
S.
F
.
IF
l
l
O
S
2
0
8
0
9
~
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
BO
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
CU
R
V
E
TA
B
L
E
CU
R
V
E
DE
L
T
A
RA
D
I
U
S
LE
N
G
T
H
C7
2•
0
0
'
2
0
•
28
0
.
0
0
'
21
9
.
8
2
'
BO
U
N
D
A
R
Y
OF
NO
.
78
2
3
/1
2
/
1
9
8
4
C/
)
<(
z c3
z w
<(
Cl
z ~
<(
~
~c
:
:
;
'
JJ
~
---
-
-
-
-
L4
l.1
LIN
E
TA
B
L
E
LI
N
E
BE
A
R
I
N
G
LE
N
G
T
H
L1
so
o
•
3
9
•
0
1
·
w
23
3
9
.18
'
L2
S1
7
1
7
'
4
5
•
E
27
9
.
8
8
'
L3
N6
1
-
0
2
'
0
2
•
E
47
4
.
9
5
'
L4
N1
6
-
s
o
·
o
o
·
w
14
1
4
.
9
9
'
LS
NO
Y
5
9
'
3
o
·
w
66
3
.
2
4
'
L6
sa
6
-
0
0
•
3
o
•
w
17
7
.
9
9
'
LB
N2
4
-
0
5
'
1
7
•
w
16
4
.
8
6
'
L9
sa
9
•
0
4
•24
•
E
30
7
.
6
2
'
L1
0
NO
Y
5
9
'
3
o
·
w
82
6
.
1
1
'
L1
9
S1
9
1
5
'
1
1
"
E
85
7
2
.
6
2
'
SL
Y
LI
N
E
LO
T
8
I •
/
AP
l
t
2
1
4
-
-
1
!
1
0
-
1
9
-
::
:
-
,
'-
-
Z
_
:
~-
;
/
1
;
;
;
;
;
.
;
-
-
J,.
---
I"
"
)
I
~
._
I-
I
LL.
I
LL.
I
Is
o
u
r
H
:::
r
:
(/
)
RO
S
8
5
8
1
C
A
R
L
S
B
A
D
S
T
A
T
E
LL.
I
LL.
I
I
(/
)
AP
N
:
21
6
-
1
4
0
-
0
8
ME
A
N
HIG
H
TI
D
E
LIN
E
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L
1
9
(T
I
E
L
I
N
E
-
)
-
-
-
-
-
L2
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
O
C
E
A
N
TP
O
B
SH
E
E
T
2
OF
4
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
AR
E
A
OF
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
FR
O
M
LE
U
C
A
D
I
A
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
DIS
T
R
I
C
T
10
7
.
0
0
AC
R
E
S
AS
S
E
S
S
O
R
'
S
PA
R
C
E
L
NU
M
B
E
R
S
I LA
F
C
O
RE
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
NO
.
I AC
R
E
A
G
E
ID
A
TE
SC
A
L
E
DIS
C
L
A
I
M
E
R
:
"F
O
R
AS
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
PU
R
P
O
S
E
S
ON
L
Y
.
TH
I
S
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
OF
LA
N
D
IS
NO
T
A
LE
G
A
L
PR
O
E
R
T
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
AS
DE
F
I
N
E
D
IN
TH
E
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
MA
P
AC
T
AN
D
MA
Y
NO
T
BE
US
E
D
AS
TH
E
BA
S
I
S
FO
R
AN
OF
F
E
R
FO
R
SA
L
E
OF
TH
E
LA
N
D
DE
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
"
30
0
'
011
1
1
1
1
5
0
'
30
0
'
SC
A
L
E
1"
=
3
0
0
'
21
4
-
1
5
0
-
1
9
,
21
6
-
1
4
0
-
0
8
21
4
-
1
6
0
-
0
4
10
06
&:
25
,
27
,
28
.
34
10
39
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
BO
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
BE
I
N
G
A
PO
R
T
I
O
N
OF
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
29
,
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
32
AN
D
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
33
,
T1
2
S
,
R4
W
,
SB
M
,
SA
N
DIE
G
O
CO
U
N
T
Y
10
7
.
0
0
12
/
2
1
/
2
0
2
2
11
"
=
3
0
0
'
Ri
g
h
t
-
O
f
-
W
a
y
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
In
c
.
81
1
1
So
u
t
h
Tr
e
m
o
n
t
SI
N
e
t
•
Oc
e
a
n
s
i
d
e
,
CA
92
0
1
1
4
ro
w
e
r
o
w
.
a
g
.
n
e
t
(7
8
0
)
88
7
-
2
7
0
0
Dra
w
t
n
9
fi
e
na
m
e
:
Ca
r
l
s
b
a
d
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
De
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
Jo
b
No
.
22
1
1
-
0
0
3
6
-
0
7
s
CA
T
A
M
A
R
A
N
7~
1
TR
A
D
E
W
I
N
D
S
DR
I
V
E
-+
I
-LL.
I
LL.
I
::
c
V)
LL.
I
LL.
I
V)
S
O
U
TH
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
--
-
RE
S
O
O
J
T
I
O
N
NO
.
33
7
AD
O
P
T
E
D
11
/
1
2
/
1
9
7
0
A.
T.
&
S.
F
.
LE
E
W
A
R
D
ST
R
E
E
T
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
BO
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
RO
S
2
0
8
0
9
AP
N
:
2
1
4
-
1
5
0
-
1
9
C
A
R
L
S
B
A
D
S
T
A
T
E
_
_
L1
9
(T
I
E
LI
N
E
)
_
_
ME
A
N
HI
G
H
TI
D
E
LI
N
E
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
O
C
E
A
N
LI
N
E
TA
B
L
E
LI
N
E
I
BE
A
R
I
N
G
L1
0
I
NO
Y
5
9
'
3
o
·
w
L 11
I
N2
0
•
3
5
•
2
2
•
w
L1
2
I
N8
9
1
l
9
'
2
8
•
w
L1
3
I
N1
9
1
l
8
'
5
4
"
W
L1
9
I
S1
9
1
5
'
1
1
.
E
RO
S
1
AP
N
: 21
4
-
1
6
0
-
3
7
LE
N
G
T
H
82
6
.
1
1
'
19
4
.97
'
56
5
.38
'
31
7
4
.34
'
85
7
2
.
6
2
'
t
. , .
04
0
5
AP
N
: 21
4
-
1
6
0
-
.
.
B
E
A
C
H
N
I
-LL.
I
LL.
I
::
c
V)
LL.
I
LL.
I
V)
SH
E
E
T
3
OF
4
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
AR
E
A
OF
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
FR
O
M
LE
U
C
A
D
I
A
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
10
7
.
0
0
AC
R
E
S
AS
S
E
S
S
O
R
'
S
PA
R
C
E
L
NU
M
B
E
R
S
I LA
F
C
O
RE
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
NO
.
I AC
R
E
A
G
E
ID
A
TE
SC
A
L
E
DIS
C
L
A
I
M
E
R
:
"F
O
R
AS
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
PU
R
P
O
S
E
S
ON
L
Y
.
TH
I
S
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
OF
LA
N
D
IS
NO
T
A
LE
G
A
L
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
AS
DE
F
I
N
E
D
IN
TH
E
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
MA
P
AC
T
AN
D
MA
Y
NO
T
BE
US
E
D
AS
TH
E
BA
S
I
S
FO
R
AN
OF
F
E
R
FO
R
SA
L
E
OF
TH
E
LA
N
D
DE
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
"
30
0
'
011
1
1
1
1
5
0
'
30
0
'
SC
A
L
E
1"
=
3
0
0
'
21
4
-
1
5
0
-
1
9
,
21
6
-
1
4
0
-
0
8
21
4
-
1
6
0
-
0
4
10
06
&:
25
,
27
,
28
.
34
10
39
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
BO
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
BE
I
N
G
A
PO
R
T
I
O
N
OF
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
29
,
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
32
AN
D
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
33
,
T1
2
S
,
R4
W
,
SB
M
,
SA
N
DIE
G
O
CO
U
N
T
Y
10
7
.
0
0
12
/
2
1
/
2
0
2
2
11
"
=
3
0
0
'
Ri
g
h
t
-
O
f
-
W
a
y
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
In
c
.
81
1
1
So
u
t
h
Tr
e
m
o
n
t
SI
N
e
t
•
Oc
e
a
n
s
i
d
e
,
CA
92
0
1
1
4
ro
w
e
r
o
w
.
a
g
.
n
e
t
(7
8
0
)
88
7
-
2
7
0
0
Dra
w
t
n
9
fi
e
na
m
e
:
Ca
r
l
s
b
a
d
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
De
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
Jo
b
No
.
22
1
1
-
0
0
3
6
-
0
7
CU
R
V
E
TA
B
L
E
LI
N
E
TA
B
L
E
CU
R
V
E
DE
L
T
A
RA
D
I
U
S
LE
N
G
T
I
-
1
LIN
E
BE
A
R
I
N
G
LE
N
G
T
I
-
1
C1
4
0"
2
2
'
3
6
•
19
.84
6
.00
'
13
0
.
4
7
'
L1
3
N1
9
1
>
8
'
5
4
"
W
31
7
4
.
3
4
'
C1
5
0•
4
1
•
3
4
•
19
.84
6
.00
'
23
9
.96
'
L1
6
N1
8
1
>
5
'
0
7
"
W
11
7
2
.
3
2
'
c1
1
10
5
•
4
4
•
2
5
•
20
.00
'
37
.96
'
L1
8
N8
9
·
2
0
•
3
9
•w
56
7
.
4
1
'
L1
9
S1
9
1
5
'
1
1
•
E
:
R~
7
2
.
R
?
'
~
;
~
,__
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
·
r
I
IJ
=
i
'
I
I
___,
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
,
Q
Y
I
1
~
-
;
:
-
~
~
-
K
-
-
~
___
__
,
_
__
I
A.
T
.
&
~
/
CA
T
A
M
A
R
A
N
DR
I
V
E
FR
A
N
C
I
S
C
A
N
RD
.
~
!}
11
L
l
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
r
~~
a
~
_J
_
I
=
~ ~-
i
TR
A
D
E
W
I
N
D
S
DR
I
V
E
SU
R
F
S
I
D
E
LN
.
~
I
I
,
,
,
, r}
C1
7
L1
6
C1
5
~
i
C1
4
I
L1
3
NO
R
l
H
E
R
L
Y
BO
U
N
D
A
R
Y
OF
~
u
r
c
,
,
r
a
1
v
-~
•••
-
•-
~
r&
/
;~
~
~
O
f
;
~
~
:
C
E
~
~
~
~
1:J
2
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
BO
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
~1
1
~
~
~
:
~
N
:
RO
S
20
8
0
8
AD
O
P
T
E
D
11
/
1
2
/
1
9
7
0
~~
n
"'
!J
~
AP
N
:
2
1
4
-
1
5
0
-
1
9
I-
~ ~
w
~J
Q
S
O
U
T
H
C
A
R
L
S
B
A
D
S
T
A
T
E
B
E
A
C
H
~
~
w w
L 19
(T
I
E
LI
N
E
)
cn
-
-
-
-
-
-
ME
A
N
HIG
H
TI
D
E
LI
N
E
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
O
C
E
A
N
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
AR
E
A
OF
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
FR
O
M
SH
E
E
T
4
OF
4
LE
U
C
A
D
I
A
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
10
7
.
0
0
AC
R
E
S
AS
S
E
S
S
O
R
'
S
PA
R
C
E
L
NU
M
B
E
R
S
LA
F
C
O
RE
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
NO
.
AC
R
E
A
G
E
DA
T
E
SC
A
L
E
DIS
C
L
A
I
M
E
R
·
,
21
4
-
1
5
0
-
1
9
,
21
6
-
1
4
0
-
0
8
"F
O
R
AS
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
PU
R
P
O
S
E
S
ON
L
Y
.
TH
I
S
30
0
o _
_
_
15
0
'
to
o
'
21
4
-
1
6
0
-
0
4
1
0
06
&:
25
2
7
28
.
34
10
39
10
7
.
0
0
12
/
2
1
/
2
0
2
2
1"
=
3
0
0
'
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
OF
LA
N
D
IS
NO
T
A
LE
G
A
L
•
•
•
CA
R
L
S
B
A
D
BO
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
~-
"
t
Of
-
E
n
w
l
n
M
f
t
f
f
s
..
.
.
.
.
In
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
AS
DE
F
I
N
E
D
IN
TH
E
&--
-n
a
y
..
,
.
&
&
&
e
e
u
.
&
&
5
e.
.
-
n
c
e
s
,
c.
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
MA
P
AC
T
AN
D
MA
Y
NO
T
BE
•
•
•
I
BE
I
N
G
A
PO
R
T
I
O
N
OF
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
29
,
811
)
So
u
t
h
Tr
e
m
o
n
t
st
r
e
e
t
•
Oc
e
a
n
s
i
d
e
,
CA
92
0
1
1
4
US
E
D
AS
TH
E
BA
S
I
S
FO
R
AN
OF
F
E
R
FO
R
.,
,
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
32
AN
D
FR
A
C
T
I
O
N
A
L
ro
w
e
r
o
w
.
a
g
.
n
e
t
(7
8
0
)
88
7
-
2
7
0
0
SA
L
E
OF
TH
E
LA
N
D
DE
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
"
SC
A
L
E
1
=3
0
0
SE
C
T
I
O
N
33
T1
2
S
R4
W
SB
M
SA
N
DIE
G
O
CO
U
N
T
Y
Dr
a
w
t
n
v
fi
e
na
m
e
:
C
a
r
l
s
b
a
d
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
De
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
•
•
•
'
Jo
b
No
.
22
1
1
-
0
0
3
6
-
0
7
Page 1 of 2
DETACHMENT NO.
DETACHMENT FROM THE LEUCADIA WASTEWATER DISTRICT
GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 215-022-02 THROUGH 09 AND 11, 12, 13
215-023-01 THROUGH 11 AND 14, 15215-050-45 AND 46
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 23 AND NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26,
TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 26 AS SHOWN ON MAP 16329 RECORDED FEBRUARY 27, 2019 AS FILE NO: 2019-7000078 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE (1) NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID MAP 16329 AND THE WEST LINE
OF SAID SECTION 26 NORTH 00°42’45” WEST 1311.33 FEET TO NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26 AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 23;
THENCE (2) CONTINUING ALONG SAID MAP 16329, NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF
SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 23 NORTH 00°33’46” EAST 1320.06 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL
SECTION 23;
THENCE (3) CONTINUING ALONG SAID MAP 16329, EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 23
SOUTH 89°31’19” EAST 1347.97 FEET TO NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 23;
THENCE (4) CONTINUING ALONG SAID MAP 16329, SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF
SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 23
SOUTH 00°33’08” WEST 1318.06 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 23 AND THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26;
THENCE (5) CONTINUING ALONG SAID MAP 16329, SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF
SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26 SOUTH 00°22’00” EAST 1314.42 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26;
THENCE (6) CONTINUING ALONG SAID MAP 16329, WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF
SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 26 NORTH 89°28’10”
WEST 1340.35 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 81.33 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DESCRIPTION OF LAND IS NOT A LEGAL PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION AS DEFINED IN THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND MAY NOT BE USED AS THE BASIS FOR AN OFFER FOR SALE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED.
Page 2 of 2
THIS REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT.
______________________________________ MICHAEL L. SCHLUMPBERGER, PLS 7790
December 14, 2022_______________________ DATE
LIN
E
BE
A
R
I
N
G
LE
N
G
T
H
~
!!
[
8
L1
N0
0
"
4
2
'
45
•
w
13
1
1
.
3
3
'
L2
N0
0
"
3
3
'
46
.
E
13
2
0
.
0
6
'
t
NO
R
T
H
L3
S8
9
"
3
1
'1
g•
E
13
4
7
.
9
7
'
l l
..
AP
N
:
21
5
-
0
2
2
-
0
3
AD
O
P
l
E
D
1/
2
3
/
1
9
6
1
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
AR
E
A
OF
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
FR
O
M
LE
U
C
A
D
I
A
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
DIS
T
R
I
C
T
81
.
3
3
AC
R
E
S
DIS
C
L
A
I
M
E
R
:
"F
O
R
AS
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
PU
R
P
O
S
E
S
ON
L
Y
.
TH
I
S
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
OF
LA
N
D
IS
NO
T
A
LE
G
A
L
PR
O
E
R
T
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
AS
DE
F
I
N
E
D
IN
TH
E
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
MA
P
AC
T
AN
D
MA
Y
NO
T
BE
US
E
D
AS
TH
E
BA
S
I
S
FO
R
AN
OF
F
E
R
FO
R
SA
L
E
OF
TH
E
LA
N
D
DE
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
"
40
0
'
0
20
0
'
40
0
'
SC
A
L
E
1"
=
4
0
0
'
L5
L4
L5
L6
AP
N
:
21
5
-
0
5
0
-
4
6
s0
0
·
3
3
•
o
a
·
w
s0
0
"
2
2
'
o
o
·
E
N8
9
"
2
8
'
1
o·
w
AP
N
:
21
5
-
0
5
0
-
4
5
13
1
8
.
0
6
'
13
1
4
.
4
2
'
13
4
0
.
3
5
'
~
IN
II
A
P
1
8
3
2
9
AP
N
:
21
5
-
0
2
3
-
1
0
AP
N
:
21
5
-
0
2
3
-
0
2
21
5
-
0
2
3
-
1
1
21
5
-
0
2
3
-
1
5
~-
~
N
I
'
N
N
PO
B
SW
CO
R
N
E
R
OF
NW
1/
4
OF
lH
E
NW
1/
4
OF
SE
C
T
I
O
N
26
AS
S
E
S
S
O
R
'
S
PA
R
C
E
L
NU
M
B
E
R
S
I LA
F
C
O
RE
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
NO
.
I AC
R
E
A
G
E
ID
A
TE
SC
A
L
E
21
5
-
0
2
2
-
0
2
TO
09
cl:
11
TO
13
PO
I
N
S
E
T
T
I
A
LA
N
E
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
BE
I
N
G
A
PO
R
T
I
O
N
OF
TH
E
NO
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
QU
A
R
T
E
R
OF
SE
C
T
I
O
N
26
AN
D
SO
U
T
H
W
E
S
T
QU
A
R
T
E
R
OF
SE
C
T
I
O
N
23
,
T1
2
S
,
R4
W
,
SB
M
,
SA
N
DIE
G
O
CO
U
N
T
Y
81
.
3
3
12
/
1
4
/
2
0
2
2
11
"
=
4
0
0
'
Ri
g
h
t
-
O
f
-
W
a
y
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
In
c
.
81
8
So
u
t
h
Tr
e
m
o
n
t
SI
N
e
t
•
Oc
e
a
n
s
i
d
e
,
CA
92
0
1
1
4
ro
w
e
r
o
w
.
a
g
.
n
e
t
(7
8
0
)
88
7
-
2
7
0
0
Dr
a
w
i
n
g
fi
l
e
na
m
e
:
Po
i
n
s
e
t
t
i
a
La
n
e
De
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
Jo
b
Na
.
22
1
1
-
0
0
J
B
-
0
7
Page 1 of 1
DETACHMENT NO.
DETACHMENT FROM THE LEUCADIA WASTEWATER DISTRICT
GEOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 215-050-79, 80, 81, 82 AND 84 THROUGH 88,
AND A PORTION OF 215-050-70
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4
WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26 AS
SHOWN ON MAP 15863 RECORDED APRIL 24, 2012 AS FILE NO: 2012-0239416 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY;
THENCE (1) ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 4 OF SAID MAP 15863 AND THE NORTH SOUTH
CENTERLINE OF SAID SECTION 26 SOUTH 00°03’42” EAST 1440.84 FEET TO THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1 OF SAID MAP 15863;
THENCE (2) LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE AND SAID NORTH SOUTH CENTERLINE, ALONG SAID
WESTERLY PROLONGATION AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1, SOUTH 89°14’40” EAST 890.74
FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 OF SAID MAP 15863, BEING A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF
1755.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO WHICH BEARS NORTH 75°12’00” EAST;
THENCE (3) ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE, SAID PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY LINE
OF LOT 2 AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18°13’51” AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 558.42 FEET;
THENCE (4) CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 2 AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF
SAID LOT 4 NORTH 33°01’51” WEST 1045.82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE,
CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7045.00 FEET;
THENCE (5) CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE OF LOT 4, ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0°38’44” AN ARC DISTANCE OF 79.38 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 4 BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26;
THENCE (6) LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 89°17’09” WEST 53.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 16.94 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY. THIS DESCRIPTION OF LAND IS NOT A LEGAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AS DEFINED IN THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND MAY NOT BE USED AS THE BASIS
FOR AN OFFER FOR SALE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED.
THIS REAL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME, OR UNDER MY DIRECTION, IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS ACT.
______________________________________ MICHAEL L. SCHLUMPBERGER, PLS 7790
December 7, 2022_______________________
DATE
CO
U
R
S
E
I
BE
A
R
I
N
G
/
D
E
L
T
A
RA
D
I
U
S
I
LE
N
G
l
H
L1
I
S0
0
-
0
3
'
4
2
"
E
14
4
0
.
8
4
'
\
BO
U
N
D
A
R
Y
t
L2
I
S8
9
1
4
'
40
"
E
C3
I
18
1
3
'
5
1
"
89
0
.
7
4
'
17
5
5
.
o
o
'
I
55
8
.
4
2
'
WA
S
T
E
W
A
1E
R
DIS
T
R
I
C
T
AT
lH
E
llH
E
A
S
T
CO
R
N
E
R
OF
Li
L4
I
N3
3
-
0
1
'5
1
"W
10
4
5
.
8
2
'
C5
I
0"
3
8
'
4
4
"
04
5
.
o
o
'
I
79
.
3
8
'
L6
I
N8
9
1
7
'
0
9
"
W
LO
C
A
TlO
N
MA
P
NO
SC
A
L
E
,(
)
~
)
\
'l\
-
~
/ p
~
·
/
NW
C
O
R
N
E
R
Of
'
NE
1/
4
Of
'
SE
C
T
I
O
N
26
DE
P
A
R
T
I
N
G
FR
O
M
lH
E
NO
R
l
H
E
R
L
Y
BO
U
N
D
A
R
Y
Of
'
LE
U
C
A
D
I
A
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
DIS
T
R
I
C
T
AT
lH
E
NO
R
l
H
E
A
S
T
CO
R
N
E
R
Of
'
LO
T
3
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
AR
E
A
OF
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
FR
O
M
LE
U
C
A
D
I
A
WA
S
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
DI
S
T
R
I
C
T
16
.
9
4
AC
R
E
S
~
NO
R
l
H
AP
N
:
21
5
-
0
5
0
-
8
0
II
A
P
1
5
8
1
3
LO
T
4
1/
2
3
/
9
6
1
/"
-
-
.
53
.
8
4
'
PO
R
T
I
O
N
OF
AP
N
:
21
5
-
0
5
0
-
7
0
AS
S
E
S
S
O
R
'
S
PA
R
C
E
L
NU
M
B
E
R
S
I LA
F
C
O
RE
S
O
L
U
T
I
O
N
NO
.
I
AC
R
E
A
G
E
ID
A
TE
SC
A
L
E
DIS
C
L
A
I
M
E
R
:
"F
O
R
AS
S
E
S
S
M
E
N
T
PU
R
P
O
S
E
S
ON
L
Y
.
11-
1
1
5
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
OF
LA
N
D
IS
NO
T
A
LE
G
A
L
PR
O
E
R
T
Y
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
AS
DE
F
I
N
E
D
IN
lH
E
SU
B
D
I
V
I
S
I
O
N
MA
P
AC
T
AN
D
MA
Y
NO
T
BE
US
E
D
AS
lH
E
BA
S
I
S
FO
R
AN
OF
F
E
R
FO
R
SA
L
E
OF
lH
E
LA
N
D
DE
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
"
20
0
'
0
10
0
'
20
0
'
SC
A
L
E
1"
=
2
0
0
'
PO
R
T
I
O
N
OF
:
21
5
-
0
5
0
-
7
0
DO
V
E
LA
N
E
DE
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
BE
I
N
G
A
PO
R
T
I
O
N
OF
TH
E
NO
R
T
H
E
A
S
T
QU
A
R
T
E
R
OF
SE
C
T
I
O
N
26
,
T1
2
S
,
R4
W
,
SB
M
,
SA
N
DIE
G
O
CO
U
N
T
Y
16
.
9
4
12
/
2
/
2
0
2
2
11
"
=
2
0
0
'
Ri
g
h
t
-
O
f
-
W
a
y
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
In
c
.
81
8
So
u
t
h
Tr
e
m
o
n
t
SI
N
e
t
•
Oc
e
a
n
s
i
d
e
,
CA
92
0
1
1
4
ro
w
e
r
o
w
.
a
g
.
n
e
t
(7
8
0
)
83
7
-
2
7
0
0
Dr
a
w
i
n
g
fll
e
na
m
e
:
Do
v
e
La
n
e
De
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
Jo
b
No
.
22
1
1
-
0
0
3
6
-
0
7