Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLFMP 10; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 10; LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 10; 2001-06-01LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Zone 10 June 2000 CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 10 Prepared For: City of Carlsbad Growth Management Division 1635 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, California 92008 Prepared By: Document Preparation: Jack Henthorn & Associates Engineering: O'Day Consultants Traffic: Linscott Law & Greenspan June,2000 Revised June, 2001 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone I 0 INDIVIDUALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PREPARATION OF THIS PLAN OVERALL DOCUMENT PREPARATION: JACK HENTHORN & ASSOCIATES 5365 A venida Encinas, Suite A Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 438-4090 Jack Henthorn Bryan Bennett ENGINEERING: O'DA Y CONSULTANTS 7220 A venida Encinas Carlsbad, CA 92009 (619) 931-7700 PatO'Day Tim Carroll TRAFFIC: LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN John Keating Justin Rasas CITY OF CARLSBAD: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Don Neu Don Rideout E~GINEERING DEPARTMENT Clyde Wickham Glen Van Peski SPONSORING LAND OWNERS: REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT June,2000 11 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 1-1 A. DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS 1-1 8. ZONE 10 REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES 1-2 II. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... .11-1 A. PLAN OVERVIEW II-1 B. OVERVIEW OF MANAGEMENT ZONE 10 II-2 · III. BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS ........................................................................................ 111-1 A. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE III-I B. GENERALIZED CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS 111-1 C. EXISTING/APPROVED LAND USE 111-5 D. DEVELOPING LAND USE 111-5 E. BUILD OUT PROJECTION CALCULATIONS 111-5 IV. PHASING ...................................................................................................................... IV-1 A. ZONE 10 LAND USE PHASING IV-1 V. ZONE REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................. V-1 VI. CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES ..................................................................... VI-I A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD VI-I B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS VI-I C. MITIGATION VI-5 D. FINANCING VI-5 VII. LIBRARY FACILITIES ............................................................................................... VII-I A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD VII-I B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS VII-I C. MITIGATION VII-4 D. FINANCING VII-5 VIII. WAS TEW ATER TREATMENT FACILITIES ......................................................... VIII-I A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD VIII-I B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS VIII-I C. MITIGATION VIII-3 D. FINANCING VIII-5 IX. PARK FACILITIES ....................................................................................................... IX-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD IX-I B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS IX-1 C. MITIGATION IX-6 D. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF PARK ACREAGE: IX-6 June,2000 lll Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 E. FINANCING IX-6 X. DRAINAGE FACILITIES ............................................................................................. X-I A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD X-I B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS X-1 C. MITIGATION X-8 D. FINANCING X-9 XI. CIRCULATION FACILITIES ...................................................................................... XI-I A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XI-I B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS XI-I C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS XI-7 D. MITIGATION XI-35 XII. FIRE FACILITIES ........................................................................................................ XII-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XII-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY XII-1 C. MITIGATION XII-1 D. FINANCING XII-1 XIII. OPEN SPACE FACILITIES ...................................................................................... XIII-I A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XIII-I B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY XIII-1 C. MITIGATION XIII-2 D. FINANCING XIII-2 XIV. SCHOOL FACILITIES .............................................................................................. XIV -1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XIV-I B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS XIV-1 XV. SEWER FACILITIES ....................................................................................... : .......... XV-1 A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XV-1 B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS XV-1 XVI. WATER FACILITIES ................................................................................................ XVI-I A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD XVI-I B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS XVI-I C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS XVI-13 D. MITIGATION XVI-14 E. FINANCING XVI-15 XVII. FACILITIES FINANCING ....................................................................................... XVII-I A. AREAS RESPONSIBLE FOR FACILITY FINANCING XVII-1 B. TYPES OF FINANCING METHODS XVII-4 C. FINANCING PLAN XVII-5 June, 2000 IV Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 XVIII. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................ XVIII-I XIX. APPENDICES ............................................................................................................ XIX-1 A-1 CONSTRAINTS BASE MAP AT l" = 200' A-2 CITY OF CARLSBAD-ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT JOINT AGREEMENT A-2 CITY OF CARLSBAD-SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT JOINT AGREEMENT A-3 1996 PARKS AGREEMENT A-4 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS A-5 DISTRICT WILL SERVE LETTER June, 2000 V Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1 LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT 2 ZONE 10 EXISTING PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARY SHEET EXHIBIT 3 ZONE 10 BUILD OUT PUBLIC FACILITIES SUMMARYCHART EXHIBIT 4 GENERAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 10 EXHIBIT 5 SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE I 0 EXHIBIT 6 ZONE 10 PROPERTY OWNERS EXHIBIT 7 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS EXHIBIT 8 ZONING EXHIBIT 9 CONSTRAINTS MAP (REDUCED) EXHIBIT IO LFMP BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS -CONSTRAINTS EXHIBIT 11 RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS EXHIBIT 12 BUILD OUT POPULATION PROJECTIONS EXHIBIT 13 NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS EXHIBIT 14 CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS EXHIBIT 15 SOUTHEAST QUADRANT RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS EXHIBIT 16 ZONE 10 RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS EXHIBIT 17 CITYWIDE NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS EXHIBIT 18 SOUTHEAST QUADRANT NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS EXHIBIT 19 ZONE 10 NON-RESIDENTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS EXHIBIT 20 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES MAP EXHIBIT 21 PHASING OF CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES EXHIBIT 22 ZONE 10 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FINANCING MATRIX EXHIBIT 23 LIBRARY FACILITIES MAP EXHIBIT 24 LIBRARY FACILITIES PHASING EXHIBIT 25 LIBRARY FINANCING MA TRIX EXHIBIT 26 ENCINA WATER AUTHORITY CAPACITY ANALYSIS1 June,2000 1-4 1-5 1-6 1-8 1-10 11-3 11-4 11-5 111-2 111-3 111-8 111-9 111-10 IV-3 IV-4 IV-5 IV-6 IV-7 IV-8 VI-2 VI-6 VI-7 VII-2 VII-6 VII-7 VIII-I vi Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT27 WASTEWATER FACILITIES MAP EXHIBIT 28 CARLSBAD SEWER SERVICE AREA DEMAND AND AVAILABLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY EXHIBIT 29 WASTE WATER FINANCING MA TRIX EXHIBIT 30 PARK DISTRICT MAP EXHIBIT 31 DISTRICT 4 PARK.LOCATIONS EXHIBIT 32 PHASING OF PARK FACILITIES FOR DISTRICT 4 EXHIBIT 33 PARK DISTRICT 4 FINANCING MATRIX EXHIBIT 34 DRAINAGE FACILITIES MAP EXHIBIT 35 DRAINAGE FACILITIES COST ESTIMATES -PART I EXHIBIT 35 DRAINAGE FACILITIES COST ESTIMATES -PART 2 EXHIBIT 36 DRAINAGE FACILITIES FINANCING MATRIX EXHIBIT 37 2005 ZONE 10 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES EXHIBIT 38 2010 ZONE 10 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES EXHIBIT 39 2020 ZONE 10 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES EXHIBIT 40 EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT 41 EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (ADT'S) ZONE 10 EXHIBIT 42 EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE 10 EXHIBIT 43 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 44 EXISTING PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONEl0 EXHIBIT 45 2005 CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT 46 ZONE 10 TRAFFIC GENERATION YEAR 2005 EXHIBIT 47 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE 10 EXHIBIT 48 2005 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 49 2005 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONE I 0 EXHIBIT 50 2005 ZONE 10 ADT'S EXHIBIT 51 2010 CIRCULATION ELEMENT EXHIBIT 52 ZONE 10 TRAFFIC GENERATION YEAR 2010 EXHIBIT 53 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE 10 EXHIBIT 54 2010 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES EXHIBIT 55 2010 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONE 10 EXHIBIT 56 2010 ZONE IO'ADT'S EXHIBIT 57 2020 CIRCULATION ELEMENT June, 2000 VIII-4 VIII-5 VIII-6 IX-2 IX-5 IX-8 IX-9 X-7 X-10 X-11 X-12 XI-4 XI-5 XI-6 XI-9 XI-10 XI-11 XI-12 XI-13 XI-15 XI-16 XI-17 Xl-18 XI-19 XI-20 XI-22 XI-23 XI-24 XI-25 XI-26 XI-27 XI-29 vu Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone l 0 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this document is to provide a plan for supplying the public facilities that will be needed to accommodate development within the Zone 10 area of the City of Carlsbad, in accordance with the City's Growth Management Program. The plan has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan of 1986. Refer to Exhibit 1 for the location of Zone 10. A. DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS June,2000 The first step in developing such a plan is to estimate the amount of development that will be allowed in the zone. The types of land uses assumed for the zone are those shown in the Carlsbad General Plan. Exhibit 7 shows the location of the various General Plan land uses within the zone. For residential development it is assumed that the density yield will be governed by the Growth Management Control Points as shown below: General Plan Designation Residential, Low Density (RL) Residential, Low-medium Density (RLM) Residential, Medium Density (RM) Residential, Medium-high Density (RMH) Residential, High Density (RH) Density Yield 1.0 dwelling units per acre 3 .2 dwelling units per acre 6.0 dwelling units per acre 11.5 dwelling units per acre 19.0 dwelling units per acre The density yield factors stated above were applied to the vacant, developable residential land in the zone. To determine the developable acreage, the following constrained lands were deducted: • Major Power Line Easements • Future Right-of-way of Circulation Element Roads • Railroad Right-of-way • Slopes Greater Than 40% • Significant Riparian or Woodland Habitats • Wetlands • Floodways • Permanent Bodies of Water • Future School Sites • Other Environmental Features I-1 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 In addition, it is assumed that slopes of 25% to 40% may be developed at half the usual density. Using this methodology it is estimated that approximately 1,244 dwelling units could be constructed within Zone 10. The actual number of units that are ultimately constructed in the zone may vary. However, the estimate is useful and valid for purposes of this plan and is consistent with all applicable requirements of the Growth Management Program, particularly Proposition E. In addition to the residential land uses proposed, the plan proposes non-residential uses for the zone including an existing golf course, a future park site, elementary school site, open space, and Planned Industrial uses. The plan includes phasing schedules, which indicate the property owners' estimated amount of development for each year from 2000 to 2020. The phasing estimates are intended for facility planning purposes only. The phasing schedule (Exhibits 14 through 19) also includes the projections for other zones with adopted Local Facilities Management Plans. The schedules are based upon those adopted Local Facilities Management Plans and are used to determine approximate threshold years for constructing or upgrading various public facilities to maintain compliance with the Performance Standards in the Growth Management Program. The threshold years arrived at in this way are only projections for facility planning purposes. The actual thresholds must be monitored as development takes place in this zone. Facilities may be needed earlier or later than the threshold years shown in this zone plan, depending upon the actual timing of development. B. ZONE 10 REQUIREMENTS FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES June, 2000 The development assumptions outlined above are used to estimate the demand for public facilities generated by development in Zone 10 based on the eleven adopted Performance Standards in the Growth Management Program. The following table (Exhibit 2 on page 1-5) shows the current status of each facility with respect to the performance standards, given the existing amount of development in the zone. Because there is currently no developed land in Zone 10, with the exception of the golf course, the public facility demands are zero. Therefore, all eleven Performance Standards are currently being met. Exhibit 3 on page 1-6 summarizes the status of each facility with respect to the performance standards through buildout. In order to assure compliance with the Performance Standards as development occurs in the zone, the zone plan contains specific conditions of approval which are listed on Exhibits 4 and 5. Exhibit 4 contains the General Conditions that are I-2 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 applicable to all zones of the City. Exhibit 5 contains Special Conditions for Zone 10. The Special Conditions identify each facility which must be provided, whether it must be financed or constructed, and when it must be provided. The following is a list of the public facilities required to serve development in Zone IO. This list also shows whether the facility would otherwise be provided as a condition of approval for a development project or whether a special funding mechanism is needed. City Administrative Facilities. Special funding mechanism is required. This is addressed by the annexation into the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) #1. Library. Special funding mechanism is required. This is addressed by the annexation into the Mello-Roos Comm.unity Facilities District (CFD) #1. Wastewater Treatment Capacity. Funding provided by sewer connection fees. Park Facilities. Special funding mechanism is required. This is addressed by an agreement between the City and the Property owner(s) included as Appendix A-3. Drainage Facilities. Condition of approval of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. Circulation Facilities. Combination of condition of approval of development projects and Mello-Roos CFD/ Assessment District. Fire Facilities. No special funding required. Open Space. No special funding required. Schools. Special funding may be required by the appropriate school district. Sewer. Condition of approval of development project. Off-site improvements will be mitigated by the district (LCWD), funded by sewer connection fees, or by the Developer with reimbursement from the district. Water. Condition of approval of development project. Financing for Facilities. Financing for the above facilities is discussed in detail in the Financing Section. 1-3 City of Oceanside Local Facilities Management Zone 10 k Location Map Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan •• it y Of Vista City of San ■ ■ City of • Encinitas \.....rL.■ Exhibit l Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 2 Zone 10 Existing Public Facilities Summary Sheet Facility City Administrative Library Wastewater Treatment Capacity Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution June,2000 Conformance with Adopted Performance Standard Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, Park District 4 (southeast quadrant) meets the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing drainage facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing circulation facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing fire facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing open space areas meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing school facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing sewer collection facilities meet the adopted performance standard. Yes, existing water distribution facilities meet the adopted performance standard. 1-5 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 3 Zone 10 Build Out Public Facilities Summary Chart Facility City Administrative Library Wastewater Treatment Facilities Parks Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection June,2000 Conformance with Adopted Performance Standard Existing and planned facilities will meet the adopted performance standards through build out. Existing and planned facilities will meet the adopted performance standards through build out. Existing and planned facilities will meet the performance standard through build out. Park District 4 (southeast quadrant) will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Drainage facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Circulation facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. Existing facilities will meet the adopted performance standard through build out. Existing open space meets the adopted performance standard. The City determined that this facility met or exceeded the standard as stated in the 1986 CFIP. Existing and planned facilities will meet the adopted performance standard through build out. Sewer collection facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. 1-6 Water Distribution June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 Water distribution facilities will meet the adopted performance standard with the proposed mitigation measures through build out. I-7 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 4 General Conditions For Zone 10 1. All development within Zone 10 shall conform to the provisions of Section 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code and to the provisions and conditions of this Local Facilities Management Plan. 2. All development within Zone 10 shall be required to pay a public facilities fee pursuant to the standards adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1986, and as amended from time to time and all other applicable fees. Development in Zone 10 shall also be responsible for any additional fees to be incorporated into this plan that are found to be necessary to enable facilities to meet the adopted performance standard. 3. The City of Carlsbad shall monitor all facilities in Zone 10 pursuant to Subsections 21.90.B0(c), (d) and (e) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 4. All development in Zone 10 shall be in conformance with the adopted Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan as adopted by City Council Resolution 8797 on September 23, 1986 and amended January 9, 1990, and in conformance with future amendments as described in Condition 5 below. 5. Periodic amendment to the Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan is anticipated to incorporate newly acquired data, to amend conditions and upgrade standards as determined through the required monitoring program. Amendment to this Plan may be initiated by action of the Planning Commission, City Council or property owners at any time. 6. If a public facility or service is found not to be in conformance with an adopted performance standard during the yearly monitoring, or at any other time, and a financial guarantee pursuant to the Growth Management Program for the facility is not in place, the matter will be immediately brought before the City Council. If the City Council determines that non-conformance exists, then no future building or development permits shall be issued until an amendment to the CFIP, or the LFMP for this zone is approved by the City Council, or deficiency is otherwise satisfied pursuant to the Growth Management Plan. This amendment shall address any facility shortfalls and bring those facilities into conformance with the adopted performance standards. 7. After adoption of this Plan by the City Council, no building permits will be allowed unless the performance standards are complied with. 8. Approval of this LFMP does not constitute prior environmental review for projects within Zone 10. All future projects within Zone 10 shall undergo environmental review per Title 19 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Any mitigation measures determined during a project's environmental review shall be complied with in their entirety unless findings of overriding consideration are made by the City Council. June,2000 1-8 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 9. Approval of this plan does not constitute prior discretionary review for projects within Zone 10. All future discretionary projects shall undergo review per Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This plan establishes the estimated allowable number of residential units for facilities planning purposes only. This plan does not guarantee any specific residential density. 10. Approval of any discretionary permit within Zone 10 shall be contingent upon the provision of adequate public facilities to satisfy the Public Facilities Element of the General Plan. At this time a Community Facilities District has been formed to finance the construction of several Citywide facilities necessary to serve new development. If the Zone 10 properties are not a participant in that district, the required General Plan consistency finding cannot be made. Therefore, no discretionary approvals, building permits, grading permits, final maps, or development permits will be issued or approved unless the subject property annexes into the CFD or an alternate financing mechanism is provided by the developer and approved by the City Council to finance the facilities legally applicable to Zone 10 that are included in the Community Facilities District. The following activities are exempt from this: grading, minor planning entitlements or minor construction as a part of ongoing agricultural operations, minor subdivisions and lot line adjustments for financing purposes or a Planned Community Master Plan or a Specific Plan. Any exemption is solely at the City's discretion. June,2000 1-9 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 5 Special Conditions For Zone 10 The following Special Conditions apply specifically to development in Zone 10 and must be complied with in addition to the General Conditions for Zone 10. These conditions are also listed separately under the analysis discussion of each facility. Additional mitigation measures specific to the portion of Zone 10 within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan are contained within the project's Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-07). CITY ADMINISTRATIVE No Special Conditions LIBRARY No Special Conditions WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY The following action shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity: Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. PARKS A. Provide a plan which establishes acceptable access to the Alga Norte park site subject to the approval of the Planning Director, City Engineer and Parks and Recreation Director pursuant to the agreement between the City and the Property owner(s) included as Appendix A-3. B. If at any time the parks performance standard is not complied with within Park District 4, no further residential development will be allowed in Park District 4 or Zone IO unless actions have been taken by the City to provide additional park facilities. DRAINAGE A. All future development in Zone 10 will be required to construct any future Zone 10 storm drain facilities identified in the Drainage Master Plan as determined by the City Engineer and from the proposed improvements of the Villages of La Costa project. Any facilities necessary to accommodate an individual phase of future development must be financially guaranteed or provided for prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading June,2000 1-10 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 permit or building permit whichever occurs first, for any development phase requiring future storm drain facilities in Zone 10. B. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any specific sub-drainage area within Zone 10, the developers of that project are required to: 1. Pay the required drainage area fees established in the current Drainage Master Plan. C. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within Zone 10, the developers of that project are required to :financially guarantee the construction of the storm drain facilities that are determined by the City Engineer to be affected by the development and required for that phase of development that is proceeding. CIRCULATION Improvements needed now No mitigation required. Improvements needed by 2005 Poinsettia Lane -Construct Poinsettia Lane as a four-lane major arterial from El Camino Real to the existing terminus east of El Fuerte Street. Included within the construction of Poinsettia Lane will be the intersection improvements at El Camino Real, Alicante Road, and El Fuerte Street. Details of which are outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis attached as Appendix A-4. Alicante Road -Construct Alicante Road as a 2-lane collector between the northerly boundary of Zone 10 and Alga Road. Included within the construction of Alicante Road will be the intersection improvements at Poinsettia Lane and at Alga Road. Details of which are outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis attached as Appendix A-4. Improvements needed by 2010 Estrella De Mar Road -Construct Estrella De Mar Road as a two-lane local street between Poinsettia Lane and Alga Road. Included within the construction of Estrella De Mar will be the median closure at the intersection of Alga Road. El Fuerte Street -Construct as a two-lane secondary arterial between Palomar Airport Road and Alga Road. June, 2000 1-11 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Improvements needed by build out El Camino Real/Alga Road/ Aviara Parkway Intersection -Provide eastbound to southbound overlap signal phasing. FIRE FACILITIES No Special Conditions OPEN SPACE No Special Conditions SCHOOLS A. Conform with the adopted school performance standard as a prerequisite of any development within the zone. All development within Zone 10 will be conditioned in accordance with the requirements of the State of California and the Carlsbad Unified School District or San Marcos Unified School District. B. The developers and the school district will enter into an agreement which will exchange parcel tax and developer fee credit for the land valuation, site preparation costs, and certain off-site improvements for the potential elementary school site, if a school site is determined to be needed. If a school site is determined unnecessary by the School District, then the area reserved for the school site in Neighborhood 1.4 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan shall have a land use designation of Open Space, the alternative school site in Neighborhood 1. 7 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan will be available for additional development and mitigation will then be payment of school fees. SEWER Prior to approval of any neighborhood final maps within the boundary adjustment area, as shown on Exhibit 72, the Developer will receive LAFCO approval of adjustments to the sewer service boundaries or as an alternative, service agreements approved by the applicable board or council must be entered into to serve the zone in accordance with this plan. CSSD A. All development within Zone 10 will be required to pay the appropriate Sewer Connection Fees and Sewer Benefit Area Fees prior to issuance of any building permits. June, 2000 1-12 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 LCWD A. Prior to the recordation of any neighborhood final map, applicant shall provide a letter from LCWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development. B. All development within the Leucadia County Water District will be required to pay the appropriate sewer connection fees prior to issuance of any building permits. WATER All future development in Zone 10 shall pay a major facilities fee based on water meter size to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District and any capacity charge levied by the San Diego County Water Authority. In addition, all development in Zone 10 shall be required to provide any water reclamation facilities identified in the Water Reclamation Master Plan as determined by the District Engineer. Any water reclamation facilities necessary to accommodate future development must be guaranteed prior to the recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first. These guarantees shall be based upon the requirements for the service area within which the proposed development is located to the extent that the demand is created by future development. The following water facilities will be required as a condition of the approval of future development within Zone 10 to the satisfaction of the CMWD. A. The proposed 30-inch and 12-inch potable water line located in future Poinsettia Lane from El Camino Real to the east boundary of Zone 10. B. The proposed 12-inch potable line located in the future Alicante Road from Alga Road to the north boundary of Zone IO. C. The proposed reclaimed 16-inch, 12-inch and 8-inch main located in future Poinsettia Lane. June,2000 I-13 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 II. INTRODUCTION This Local Facilities Management Plan completes the second phase of Carlsbad's overall Growth Management Program for Zone 10. Phase One of the Growth Management Program was completed with the adoption of the 1986 Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan (1986 CFIP). For purposes of public facilities analysis, the 1986 CFIP separated the City into 25 Local Facilities Management Zones as shown on Exhibit 1, supra. A. PLAN OVERVIEW June,2000 This LFMP provides a detailed description and analysis of how facilities will be provided in Zone 10 from now to build out of the zone. The plan is divided into eight parts as follows: I Executive Summary: Summarizes the plan and highlights all conditions proposed by the plan. II -Introduction: Provides an introduction to the format and content of the plan. III -Build Out Projections: Projects the ultimate amount of development in Zone 10, along with itemizing existing development, and future land uses. IV -Phasing: Estimates how and when development will be phased in Zone 10. V-XVI Analysis of Public Facilities Requirements: Provides a complete description and analysis of the facilities needed to serve development in the zone based on build out projections and phasing assumptions. This is the most detailed portion of the plan. This part is divided into eleven separate sections; one for each facility. Each section provides a detailed analysis of the facility. If a facility is not conforming with the adopted performance standard, there will be a discussion describing this situation, a description of mitigation or alternatives, and a financing summary. Each facility section will conclude with adequacy findings. Adequacy findings summarize whether or not the public facility conforms with the adopted performance standard. 11-1 XVII- XVIIl- XIX- Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Finance: Provides a summary of the proposed method of financing each facility. References: Provides a list of public documents used in the preparation of this plan but not included in the Appendices due to the length of the individual documents. All References are available to the public by request of the respective publishing agency. Appendices: Provides the technical materials used in preparation of this plan. B. OVERVIEW OF MANAGEMENT ZONE 10 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Zone 10 is located in the southeast quadrant of Carlsbad as shown on Exhibit 1. The zone is bounded by El Camino Real to the west, Zone 6 to the south, Zones 6 and 18 to the east and Zone 17 to the north and east. Zone 10 comprises approximately 756.6 gross acres. Exhibit 6 lists the property owners within Zone 10 and shows the location of their holdings. Zone 10 is primarily a residential area. The Carlsbad General Plan calls for residential land uses in Zone 10 ranging in density from Residential Low Medium (0-4.0 dwelling units/acre) to Residential Medium High (8-15 dwelling units/acre). Nonresidential development consists of a potential elementary school site, a community facilities site and a planned industrial site. The School Facilities section provides the location and details of the proposed school site. The zone will also include a proposed park site and the 80.8-acre existing golf course. The Park and Open Space Facilities sections provide the location and details of the park and golf course sites. The General Plan land use designations within Zone 10 are shown on Exhibit 7. The land use zoning within Zone 10 is shown on Exhibit 8. The Villages of La Costa Master Plan Amendment was completed concurrently with this Local Facilities Management Plan. 11-2 --. I I I I I L_ I I I I ~I I _:.----/ I '"-----s I I ~~I -~--\ --~ l \ \ I I 1 I 1 1 I I Land Owner APN \ I I \ ,,_,.....r 1. Paziura/Raibys 213-050-16 1 \ ' •. \____~ _ _, 4.02ac /'--I ~-, 2. :~1~c 215-021-01 k 1 , )/ 3. Bons 215-021-06 I . 4. ~:z::ita Partners 215-021-04 1 1 1 ,1 \ 5. La Costa Hotel & Spa 215-021-08 80.56 ac 215-030-15 215-031-09 215-052-16 215-061-09 , . , ,,; ;#11 _______ 2_1_5-4_s_0-0_2..... . "'*\. , .. ,,.,J®C,;e,,,;1sr,;,;,~:-:: ": ., IA Ownership Zone 1 0 Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 6 RLM 9 RLM 10 RLM 12 I I I I k General Plan Land Use Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan --, I I I I I l__ RLM 3 RLM 6 -- --7 RLM 7 I I I I I I I I I __ J ,, -<~t ~;a Exhibit 7 05 3 I ,) I \ ~) I lf' -c1· 1P1 E-~l I I cl I I Zoning Designations I E-A I Exclusive Agriculture [§] Qualified Overlay Zone f; Limited Control Planned Community Flood Plain Ir\ Zoning Map ,\ >-J ( Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan --, I I I I I L_ 0' 300' 600' 1200' ~_,..., Exhibit 8 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 III. BUILDOUT PROJECTIONS To properly assess and plan for facilities to serve Zone 10, it is necessary to project the type and intensity of land use as the zone builds out. These build out projections define land use intensity and corresponding facilities demands. The basis for the land uses and build out projections in this Local Facilities Management Plan is the Carlsbad General Plan as amended concurrent with this Local Facilities Management Plan and the Villages of La Costa Mater Plan (MP 98-01). The methodology used in compiling this build out projection is consistent with that used in the '86 CFIP. The methodology is briefly described as follows: A. GENERAL PLAN LAND USE General Plan Land Use Designations were plotted on a I" = 200' base map. A reduction of this map is shown in Exhibit 9. Exhibit 10 provides a detailed itemization of the area calculations. The gross acreage of these areas was determined by computer. Appendix A-1 provides a map at 1 '' = 200' scale. B. GENERALIZED CONSTRAINTS ANALYSIS Jwie,2000 Consistent with adopted City policies and ordinances, development constraints within each area were identified. Constraints that may have existed on land that is developed were not included in this analysis. Constraints fall into two basic categories: 1) full and 2) partial. Fully constrained areas cannot be used to calculate residential density and are considered undevelopable. Fifty percent of the area of partial constraints can be used in residential density calculations. Since development constraints overlap each other, for accounting purposes, constraints are organized in a hierarchy beginning at 'A' -major powerline easement and ending in 'J' -slopes between 25-40%. When overlapping occurs, only the area of the highest-level constraint is calculated for build out projection purposes. It is recognized that underlying constraints exist and that these constraints as well as others will be defined by specific environmental review for individual development projects. III-1 1.£fi£lfD; Z0/€11111MtWfY WiD/JSE--/JSC-110N + + I I R.M.H. 5 CONSTRAINTS MAP FOR PROPOSED LAND USE LA COSTA GREENS ------ ------ .. .. .. .. -- PW1RYRIU .-.. ----..... __ "' ,_:: ===-=-______ ._ __ ------1---•-1-____ ._ -- •'-_, __ L--- :::~ =:: == ;1~-; -=-----I-., _______ --- i---1---------'------------------'---1• --- !----1---,-----•--------•---1----1--•-I• •1--• , .. -- Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 10 LFMP Build Out Projections -Constraints General Plan Land Gross Use Designation Acres Full Constraints CF RLM-3 RLM-4 RUM! RLM-7 RLM-8 RLM-9 RLM-10 RLM-11 RLM-12 RLMTOTAL RM-1C RMH-5 Pl-1A E OS OS-1 OS-2 05-3 05-4 05-5 05-6 OS-7 05-8 OS TOTAL STREETS TOTALZONE June,2000 A B C D 7.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 39.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 126.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 30.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 35.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 2.3 3.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 3.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 2.9 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 327.0 0.6 1.1 0.0 17.0 8.6 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 30.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 7.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 139.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 36.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.9 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 361.2 7.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 13.7 0.0 0.0 756.6 a.sl 15.71 0.01 18.21 NOTES: A· MAJOR POWERUNE EASEMENT B -CIRCULATION C • RAILROAD ROW D ·SLOPES> 40% E 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.ol F G H I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 139.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 80.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 346.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 0.01 o.ol 346.3 E-RIPARIAN F-VIETI.ANDS G • FLOODPLAIN TOTAL 0.8 1.7 2.5 8.5 1.0 2.9 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.4 18.7 0.5 0.8 0.2 0.0 27.2 139.1 38.4 3.4 30.6 80.8 26.9 6.5 3.1 354.0 13.7 388.7 H -PERMANENT BODY OF WATER Net Developable Partial Schools Acres J J/2 K 0.4 0.2 0.0 6.9 17.0 8.5 0.0 69.8 7.5 3.8 0.0 33.6 25.2 12.6 0.0 105.1 4.0 2.0 0.0 27.4 4.5 2.3 0.0 30.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 58.7 29.4 0.0 278.9 0.6 0.3 0.0 7.8 5.2 2.6 0.0 26.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.11 32.8 7.2 328.1 1-OTHER ENVIR FEATURE J • SLOPES 25% TO 40% K • SCHOOL SITE OVERLAY 111-3 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Full constraints are as follows: A. Major(;;:: 69 kv) power-line easements B. Proposed circulation element roadways C. Railroad track beds or R-0-W D. Slopes of 40% or more in grade E. Significant riparian, or woodland habitats F. Significant wetlands G. Floodways H. Permanent bodies of water I. Other significant environmental features as determined by the Environmental Review process. Partial Constraints include: J. Slopes between 25-40% in grade: only 1/2 of the area within slopes between 25-40% in grade can be used in residential density calculations. Also included in the constraint analysis is the programming of: K. Planned school facilities The approximate area and location of school facilities are indicated in the General Plan. The beneficial and efficient provision of these facilities requires a minimum area of land free of development constraints. Consistent with City and school district policy, the minimum acreage identified by the General Plan for school facilities was not used in the applicable sub-area's residential density calculations. L. Habitat Conservation Plan In 1995, the City and the Fieldstone Company, along with various State and Federal government agencies entered into an agreement in order to preserve specific portions of Zone 10 impacted by environmentally sensitive species and habitat. This was subsequently issued to Real Estate Collateral Management (RECM). This agreement (Implementation Agreement) and its accompanying Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) significantly limited the developable area within the RECM properties and required all areas specified as conservation areas to be redesignated as General Plan Open Space. However, the agreement also provided for the shift of dwelling units previously available within the conservation areas to the developable areas. III-4 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 As a result of the requirement that the General Plan be amended to reflect the Habitat Conservation Plan/Ongoing Multi-Species Plan (HCP/OMSP), General Plan designation densities were increased within the developable areas of the RECM properties to provide for the shift of dwelling units. The RECM properties were analyzed for facilities purposes under the constraints imposed by the Villages of La Costa Master Plan rather than traditional General Plan designation based analysis. This will allow development to occur consistent with the build out projections of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan. C. EXISTING/APPROVED LAND USE Existing Land Uses within each area as of 1/1/00 were identified. No dwelling units currently exist within Zone 10. The major land use within Zone 10 is the La Costa Hotel and Spa golf course. The golf course occupies approximately 80 acres of the low-lying areas of Zone 10. In addition, there are some agricultural uses along El Camino Real. D. DEVELOPING LAND USE Developing Land Use is a category which defines the status or stage in the development process that exists for a land use proposal or project. The development process begins when a development application is submitted to the City. Various procedures are followed depending on the type of application submitted. In all cases, applications are reviewed to ensure that all City standards are met and conform with all previous discretionary approvals prior to finalizing the projects and issuing building permits. Once the project has received final occupancy, the development process ends and the land use is identified as an existing land use. Developing Land Use was identified by a review of the City of Carlsbad Planning Department development records. After receiving tentative discretionary approval, a land use is considered approved. The approval is valid until the land use is developed and occupied or the tentative approval expires. There is currently no Developing Land Use in Zone 10. E. BUILD OUT PROJECTION CALCULATIONS June,2000 Residential build out projections as of 1-1-00 for Zone 10 are shown on Exhibit 11. The build out projections are calculated as follows: 111-5 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 I. RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS The net developable acreage of each residential land use sub-area is multiplied by the adopted Growth Management control point as follows: General Plan Land Use Designation RL RLM RM RMH RH Growth Management Control Point Dwelling Units/ Acre 1.0 3.2 6.0 11.S 19 The result provides the base residential dwelling unit build out projections for each sub-area consistent with the passage of Proposition E on November 4, 1986. Both existing and approved dwelling units are subtracted from this yield to indicate the amount of future residential development in the zone. 2. NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILD OUT PROJECTIONS The net-developable acreage of each non-residential land use sub-area is multiplied by either .3 or .4 as described below. The resultant figures provide an estimate of ultimate land use intensity as defined by building square footage for each sub-area. This estimate is used for facility planning purposes. The Growth Management Program uses the .3 factor to estimate building square footage yields for either 1) unapproved and unimproved vacant unconstrained land or for 2) urbanized underdeveloped non-residential sites. These urbanized underdeveloped sites typically exhibit significant man-made constraints to development. Primary constraints are: a) compatibility with surrounding land uses and b) proper interfacing with existing infrastructure and public facilities. The .4 factor is used to estimate building square footage yields on unconstrained lots which have approved land use projects and have all infrastructure in place. The land use intensity of both existing and approved non-residential development is subtracted from this estimate to indicate the amount of future non-residential land use intensity. 111-6 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone I 0 Non-residential uses within the Zone IO area consist of the existing La Costa Hotel and Spa Golf Course, the potential school site, the future park site, the community facility site, and the planned industrial site. The future school site location or the need for an elementary school has not yet been determined. If a school site is determined not necessary by the Carlsbad Unified School District, then the area reserved for the school site shall have a land use designation consistent with the underlying General Plan land use designation. 3. BUILD OUT POPULATION PROJECTION The build out population projection for Management Zone 10 was determined by applying a population generation rate of 2.3178 persons/dwelling unit. The build out population projections for Zone 10 are shown on Exhibit 12. These build out population projections are used consistently throughout this plan for the purpose of predicting demand for public facilities. The total number of units ultimately constructed within Zone 10 may vary from the projections used in this plan, without requiring an amendment to the plan if facility requirements are not significantly changed. Sources of variance include the uncertainty of the school site, possible density bonuses for affordable housing as well as other undetermined factors. III-7 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 11 Residential Build Out Projections General Plan Land Residential Build Out Existing App. Future Use Designation Net Acres GMCP (1) Projections DU's DU's DU's (2) RLM-3 69.8 3.2 223 223 RLM-4 33.6 3.2 107 107 RLM-6 105.1 3.2 336 259 RLM-7 27.4 3.2 87 38 RLM-8 30.2 3.2 96 91 RLM-9 2.5 3.2 8 8 RLM-10 2.9 3.2 9 9 RLM-11 4.9 3.2 15 15 RLM-12 2.5 3.2 8 8 RM-1C 7.8 6.0 46 44 RMH-5 26.9 11.5 309 276 TOTAL 313.6 1244 0 0 1078 NOTES: (1) GROWTH MANAGEMENT CONTROL POINT June,2000 (2) Future Dwelling Units are restricted to those outlined in the Villages of La Costa Master Plan (MP 96-01) III-8 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 12 Build Out Population Projections Base Resldentlal DU Build Out General Plan Land Projections Existing Use Deslanatlon 11) (2) RLM-3 RLM-4 RLM-6 RLM-7 RLM-8 RLM-9 RLM-10 RLM,11 RLM-12 RM-1C RMH-5 TOTAL RES. June,2000 223 107 336 87 96 8 9 15 8 46 309 1244 NOTES: (1) See Exhibit 7 (2) See Exhibit 11 DU's Approved DU's Population Index Build Out Futunt (2.31781DU) Existing Approved Futunt Population DU's (3) Pop Pop Pop Projections 223 2.3178 517 517 107 2.3178 248 248 259 2.3178 600 600 38 2.3178 88 88 91 2.3178 211 211 8 2.3178 19 19 9 2.3178 21 21 15 2.3178 35 35 8 2.3178 19 19 44 2.3178 102 102 276 2.3178 640 640 1078 2499 2499 (3) Source: 1992-93 CFIP 111-9 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 Exhibit 13 Non-Residential Build Out Projections General Net GMP Non-Base Non-Estimated Land Use Developable Residential Residential Existing Sq. Approved Future Sq. LU Intensity Buildout Ft. Sq. Ft. Designation Acres Estimate Projections Ft. Pl-1A 7.6 40%+ 137,650 137,650 Pl Total 7.6 40%+ 137,650 137,650 CF 6.9 30% 90,169 90,169 CF Total 6.9 30% 90,169 90,169 Total Zone 14.5 227,819 227,819 June,2000 III-IO Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 IV. PHASING Phasing projections estimate when, where and how much development will occur in Zone 10 between now and build out. Although difficult to predict exactly, phasing projections begin to make possible advance planning and programming of public facilities to assure adopted performance standards are continually met. The objectives of phasing projections are as follows: 1. Project estimated demands for public facilities on a yearly basis until build out. 2. Project and establish thresholds when and where public facilities improvements are needed. 3. Projecting facility thresholds allows sufficient lead-time for facility programming to assure that the performance standards are continually met. 4. Through threshold identification allow the City to efficiently and effectively implement public facility improvements. The 1986 CFIP projects residential phasing to be 1,250 dwelling units per year. This projection was based on a review of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) projections along with those utilized in the City's Capital Improvement Program and the Public Facilities Management Systems, Monitoring Report of April 1986. The 1986 CFIP's public facility programming was based in part on this projection. A. ZONE 10 LAND USE PHASING June,2000 1. RESIDENTIAL The Villages of La Costa Master Plan has limited the number of dwellings units for those portions of land within Zone 10 covered by the Master Plan. Therefore all population and facility projections will be based upon 1,038 dwelling units from the Master Plan and 40 dwelling units from non-Master Plan areas. The residential phasing projections for Zone 10 are shown on Exhibit 16. The residential phasing schedule is intended to be used for projecting future need and timing of public facilities. It is a tool to allow the City to anticipate future public facility needs and to budget moneys for their improvement. The projected residential phasing schedule is not absolute. The actual number of dwelling units to be built each year will vary depending on economic conditions. IV-1 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 Exhibit 14 shows the residential phasing schedules of the adopted and non-adopted LFMP'S. Exhibit 14 shows the yearly phasing schedules for these zones. Exhibit 15 shows a similar phasing schedule for the zones located within the southeast quadrant of the City. The southeast quadrant phasing projections are provided to make the review and future update and monitoring of quadrant-specific facilities more manageable and easier to understand. Also, a Zone 10 residential phasing schedule is shown on Exhibit 16 for use in the review and update of zone specific public facilities. Exhibit 17 shows the non-residential phasing schedules of the adopted and non-adopted LFMP'S. Exhibit 17 shows the yearly phasing schedules for these zones. Exhibit 18 shows a similar phasing schedule for the zones located within the southeast quadrant of the City for non-residential uses. Also, a Zone 10 non-residential phasing schedule is shown on Exhibit 19 for use in the review and update of zone specific public facilities. 2. PHASING SUMMARY Residential phasing projections are provided in order to plan for public facilities. The plan provides these projections to establish thresholds which necessitate the need for additional facilities. The Growth Management Program and the Zone 10 LFMP anticipate that the actual phasing of development in this zone will vary from these projections. In no instance, however, will a change in phasing result in the failure of any performance standard being met. The public facility thresholds established in this plan will ensure that compliance with the adopted performance standards is maintained or no development will be allowed until compliance is reached. IV-2 EXHIBIT 14 -CITY WIDE BP!PJNTIAL PHASING PROJECTIONS Totala of.......,_, LMFP'a Lacal l'aclllly ............-z-Total Total~ Total Y•rs 1 2 3 4 I • 7 I I 10 11 12 13 14 11 11 17 11 11 211 Z1 Z2 23 24 ZI AdoplN DU'••of1/1 atywlde Stalua u of 1/1 11\ 121 (31 (41 (51 !Bl m CBI nn !10l (111 (121 !131 (141 !151 !1111 (171 (18} (191 '201 1211 ('2\ PhaAdDU'a --Eldatina 2000 10,195 2.480 237 3085 138 8184 1341 44 850 D 1885 1252 D 2 520 D D 1,1194 1885 1,058 551 439 0 338 1 351181 35881 83,420 Proj9Cled 2,000 40 22 1 0 0 40 80 40 51 D ID 125 Q Q 15 Q Q Q 811 78 95 179 28 Q 0 1,028 37,017 811,711 2,001 20 0 1 0 0 40 80 180 0 11D 210 121 0 Q 15 Q Q Q 18 151 130 50 28 0 0 1,318 38,285 81,737 2,002 20 D 0 0 0 17 80 1ao 0 150 210 125 0 D 15 Q Q 0 7 118 30 50 28 0 0 1,100 38,385 11.287 2,003 20 0 0 0 0 17 80 1ao 0 150 210 31 0 D 15 Q Q Q 10 14 30 50 21 0 0 11113 40,348 93,5111 2,004 40 Q 0 0 0 17 ID 177 0 150 -0 0 0 21 0 Q Q 10 138 23 50 29 0 0 932 41,290 1111,m 2,005 40 5 0 0 0 17 ID 40 0 11D 119 0 0 0 41 0 100 19 11 50 21 39 29 15 0 811 ,Q,091 97,551 2,006 40 5 0 0 0 17 ID 31 D 150 119 D 0 Q 49 0 100 0 11 50 13 105 0 15 0 819 ,Q,910 118,457 2,007 40 5 0 0 0 17 ID D 0 150 1811 0 0 14 41 Q 100 0 11 50 13 0 0 15 0 740 43,850 101,172 2,008 40 s 0 0 0 17 ID 0 0 21 119 a 0 100 48 0 100 0 11 50 13 0 0 15 0 853 44,303 102,885 2,009 83 5 0 0 0 17 ID 0 0 0 188 0 0 100 48 0 100 0 11 50 11 0 0 15 0 848 44,11111 104,187 2,010 83 5 0 0 0 17 ID 0 D 0 18 0 0 100 95 Q 100 0 11 32 0 0 0 14 0 503 45,454 1115,353 2,011 83 5 0 0 0 17 50 0 0 0 18 0 0 100 88 0 100 0 11 15 0 0 0 0 0 481 45,915 108,422 2,012 83 5 0 0 0 17 50 0 Q 0 15 0 0 100 88 0 100 0 11 15 0 0 0 0 0 481 48,379 107,480 2,013 83 5 0 0 0 17 50 0 0 0 12 0 0 100 95 0 100 0 11 15 0 0 0 0 0 458 48,834 108,552 2,014 83 s 0 0 0 18 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 95 0 18 0 12 15 0 0 0 0 25 389 47,223 109,453 2,015 83 5 0 0 0 18 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 58 Q 0 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 30 302 47,525 110,183 2,018 83 5 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 • 0 0 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 30 311 47,1311 110.974 2,017 83 5 0 0 0 0 0 D D D 0 0 0 100 88 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 30 211 48,117 111.529 2,018 82 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 30 178 48,213 111,134 2,019 81 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 30 138 48,4211 11:Z.249 Build Out 2020 0 0 0 0 ·o 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D D D 0 D 0 15 D 0 0 0 0 0 15 48,444 112,214 TOTAL 11,181 2.m 239 s.ou 131 1,121 2.321 -IOI 1,871 3,114 , ... 0 1--17U .a 111 1,713 2,029 1-l30 912 171 427 178 48,444 48,444 112,284 Notes: (1) Zone 1 LFMP, ldapled Septernll8r 1, 1987, C.C. Rao. No. 9221 (9) Zone 9 LFMPA. adcJplld ,lnay 18, 11184 C.C. Rao. No.114-27 (17) Zone 19 LFMP. 8dopled December I, 1987, C.C. Rno. No. 9322. (2) Zone 2 LFMP, lldoplld June 18, 1987, C.C. Rao. No. 9123 (10) Zone 12 LFt,I', adeiplldAuguat21, 11111D, c.c. Rao. No. II0-2.64. (18) Zone 20 LFMPA, adopled December 14, 11183, C.C. R-. No. 93-290 (3) Zone 3 LFMP, ldapled May 19, 1987, C.C. Rao. No. OCll4 (11) Zone13LFIFB, adcJplld Janualyll, 111118,C.C. Raao. No. 19-10 (19) Zone 21 LFMPA, adopled October 11, 11184, C.C. RHo. No. 114-292 (4) Zone 4 LFMP, lldoplld June 18, 1987, C.C. Rao. No. 9122 (12) Zone 14 LFMP, adcJplld Flllnlary8, 11111D C.C. Rao. No. ll0-24. (20) Zone 22 LFMPA, 8dopled Janua,y 13, 1998, C.C. RHo. No. H-10 (5) Zone 5 LFMPA. ad0plad 0c:mbll' 21, 1997, C.C. RNo. No. 97-147 (13) Zone 15 LFMPB, adcJplld NcMmber 17, 11198, c.c. Rao. No. 98-337 (21) From City ol cartllbad Finance Oepartment (8) Zone 8 LFMP, aClopllCI No\1amller 10, 1987, C.C. RNo. No. 9211 (14) Zone 111 LFMP, adcJplld Aprtl 7, 1892, C.C. Rao. No. 112-94. (22) Zone 24 l.FMPA, adopted, Janua,y 18, 11184, C.C. R-. No. 114-25 (7) Zone 7 LFMP, ldapled a-nller 5, 1988, C.C. Rao. No. 8M24 (15) From Zone 17 LFMP draft on Ille Ill._ time o1111e lnlfflc _.,.., rar 1h11 Zone (8) Zone 8 LFMPA, lldoplld January28, 1-, C.C. RNo. No. 119-311 (18) Zone 11 LFMPA, 8dopled NcMmba' 5, 19111, C.C. R81o. Ho. 9&-370 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 15 Southeast Quadrant Residential Phasing Projections Local Facilities Management Zones Totals of LFMP's Total Quadrant Total Years as DUsasof Quadrant Status of 1/1 6(SE) 10 11 12 17 (1) 18 1/1 Population Existing 2000 7688 0 1885 1252 0 1694 12,519 29,017 Proposed 2000 40 0 80 125 0 0 12,764 29,584 2001 40 150 210 125 0 0 13,289 30,801 2002 17 150 210 125 0 0 13,791 31,965 2003 17 150 210 38 0 0 14,206 32,927 2004 17 150 209 0 0 0 14,582 33,798 2005 17 150 166 0 100 19 15,034 34,846 2006 17 150 166 0 100 0 15,467 35,849 2007 17 150 166 0 100 0 15,900 36,853 2008 17 28 166 0 100 0 16,211 37,574 2009 17 0 168 0 100 0 16,496 38,234 2010 17 0 16 0 100 0 16,629 38,543 2011 17 0 15 0 100 0 16,761 38,849 2012 17 0 15 0 100 0 16,893 39,155 2013 17 0 12 0 100 0 17,022 39,454 2014 16 0 0 0 18 0 17,056 39,532 2015 16 0 0 0 0 0 17,072 39,569 2016 15 0 0 0 0 0 17,087 39,604 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,087 39,604 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,087 39,604 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,087 39,604 Build Out 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,087 39,604 TOTAL 8,019 1,078 3,694 1,665 918 1,713 17,087 39,604 (1) Existing General Plan designations for Zone 17 projed 500 dwelling units for the zone. At the time of preparation of the traffic analysis for this document, the application of file for Zone 17 included 918 dwelling units and is evaulated as such through the remainder of this document June,2000 IV-4 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 16 Zone 10 Residential Phasing Projections Total Zone Years as DU's as of Total Zone Status of 1/1 Zone 10 1/1 Population Existing 2000 0 0 0 Proposed 2000 0 0 a 2001 150 150 348 2002 150 150 348 2003 150 150 348 2004 150 150 348 2005 150 150 348 2006 150 150 348 2007 150 150 348 2008 28 28 65 2008 0 0 0 TOTAL 1078 1078 2499 June,2000 IV-5 EXHIBIT J7 • CITY WJDI NQN-BHJDENTJAL PHAIJNG PROJECTION§ Yoasl , 2 3 4 • I 7 -asaf1/1 m 12\ 131 I() 151 18) m ~--2.000 361 T.31 78103 400,424 0 6,460,780 861113 0 ~ 2.000 25,000 0 85,783 0 250,000 0 0 2,001 62.500 0 15,000 0 150,000 0 0 2.002 62,500 0 10,000 0 9,011 0 0 2,003 86,000 10,000 6,100 0 0 0 0 2,004 86,000 0 40,770 0 0 0 0 2,005 86,000 11,000 8,100 0 0 0 10,000 2,008 86,000 10,800 8,100 0 0 0 10.000 2,007 86,000 0 8,100 0 0 0 10,000 2,006 86,000 0 8,100 0 0 0 10,000 2,009 86,000 0 8,100 0 0 0 10,000 2,010 86,000 0 8,100 0 0 0 10,000 2,011 86,000 0 8,100 0 0 0 10,000 2,012 86,000 0 8,100 0 0 0 10,000 2,013 86,000 0 8,100 22,869 0 0 10,000 2,014 86,000 0 8,100 0 0 0 11.227 2,015 86,000 0 7,488 0 0 0 0 2,018 86,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,017 86,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.018 110,797 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,019 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Build Out 2.020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1,142,128 181,903 121,123 22,IA l,la,791 H,1Q 1111,227 Nein: (1) Zone 1 LFMP, ldoptad-bor 1, 1987, C.C. Roso. No. 9221 (2) Z<IM 2 LFMP, adoplad J<Jne 16, 1987, C.C. Roso. No. 9123 (3) Zono 3 LFMP, adoplad May 19, 1987, C.C. Rno. No. 9084 14) Zona 4 LFMP, adoplad Juno 18, 1987, C.C. Reoo. No. 9122 (5) Zone 5 LFMPA, adopllod Odl>bor 21, 1997, C.C. Rno. No. 97-647 (8) Zone 8 LFMP, ldoptad -10, 1987, C.C. Reoo. No. 9291 17) Zone 7 LFMP, adopllod o.-mbor 5, 1989, c.c. Roso. No. 1111-,\24 (8) Zono 8 LFMPA, odoptBd January 26, 1999, C.C. Roso. No. 99-30 I 18) 3.800 0 0 0 0 8,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1- • 191 D 0 0 3,018 9,078 8,500 0 0 0 43,514 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 414,171 (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (18) Lacall'Mlllly----Za,,es ,. 11 12 13 14 11m 111) /1?1 0 344 11001 1718305 0 58,192 0 0 0 <103,801 30,000 28,000 58,961 95,398 0 0 56,IM!II 83,835 0 106,142 58,955 53,579 0 34,500 58,955 11,781 0 120,000 0 0 0 847,000 0 0 0 106,842 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106,142 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 343,800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 227,111 TIM,781 41,001 3,244,431 Zeno 9 LFMPA, ldoptad Jomoary 18, 1994 C.C. Rooo. No. 94-27 Zeno 121.FMP. adoplod August 21, 1990, C.C. R-. No. 9G-284. Zone 13 LFMPB, adoplad January 9, 11198, C.C. Rno. No. 99-10 Zano 14 LFMP, ldoptad Fobruoly 8, 1990 C.C. Rno. No. 9()-24. Zano 15 LFMPB, adoplad ,__ 17, 11198, C.C. RNO. No. 98-337 Zano 181.FMP, ldoptad April 7, 1992. C.C. Roso. No. 92-84. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 From Zeno 17 LFMP drllton ftlo lllhe time aflhetralllc ~ lar1hls Zano Zano 18 LFMPA, adoplad Nowmbor 5, 1898, C.C. RNO. No. 98-370 18 11 113) 114) 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 50,000 341,510 50,000 148,146 28,000 148,146 3,000 323,215 3,000 393,347 3,000 202.m 3,000 202.m 3,000 218,018 3,000 0 3.000 0 3.000 0 3,000 0 8,000 0 8,000 0 8,000 0 8,000 0 8,000 0 3,000 0 8798 0 244,7" 1,171,931 17 115) 0 0 0 44,280 44,280 44,280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132,140 ,. 1181 0 740,333 740,333 740,334 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,221,000 1,n (18) (19) 120) 121) (22) 11 zo 21 22 23 11n 118) 119) 120) r.m 241101 1114 0 147419 0 140,000 9,897 0 0 70,000 80,000 0 0 80,000 32,1130 80,000 0 0 80,000 32,831 40,000 0 0 54,500 100,000 0 Q 0 54,292 100,000 0 0 0 50,500 100,000 0 0 0 14,580 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117111 11,011 0 441,271 435,291 Zone 19 LFMP, adopllod Docombor 8, 1987, C.C. RNO. No. 9322. Zano 20 LFMPA adopllod Oecwn.ber 14, 1116G, C.C Rno. No. 93-280 Zono 21 LFMPA, adopllod OCIDIJer 11, 1994, C.C. Rno. No. 94-292 Zano 22 LFMPA, adopllod Jlnuary 13, 1998, C.C. Roso. No. 98-10 From Clly ol C1riobod Finance Dopar1menl Zano 24 LFMPA adopllod, Jlnuory 18, 19!M, C.C. Roso. No. 94-25 ·-Cllywlde 24 2S lq-122) ......... 0 0 951437D 0 0 1 .... ,,185 0 0 1,852,284 0 0 1,585,832 0 0 780,038 0 Q 843,SlS 0 0 762,531 0 0 1,154,807 0 0 398,714 0 0 335,456 0 0 391,818 0 0 139,100 0 0 139,100 Q Q 245,942 0 0 181,969 0 0 488,927 0 0 131,488 0 50,000 124,000 0 50,000 124,000 0 50,000 188,797 0 ~.821 58,821 0 0 8 798 a 2111,121 21,311,115 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 Exhibit 18 Southeast Quadrant Non-Residential Phasing Projections Local Facilities Management Zones Totals of LFMP's Total Quadrant Years as Non-Residential as Status of 1/1 6(SE) 10 11 12 17 18 of 1/1 Existing 2000 0 0 344 11,001 0 0 11,345 Proposed 2000 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,345 2001 0 0 56,192 0 0 740,333 807,870 2002 0 56,954 403,801 30,000 0 740,333 2,038,958 2003 0 56,955 95,396 0 44,280 740,334 2,975,923 2004 0 56,955 83,635 0 44,280 0 3,160,793 2005 0 56,955 53,579 0 44,280 0 3,315,607 2006 0 0 11,761 0 0 0 3,327,368 2007 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2008 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2009 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2010 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2011 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2012 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2013 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2014 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2015 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2016 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 Build Out 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,327,368 TOTAL 0 227,819 704,708 41,001 132,840 2,221,000 3,327,368 (1) At the time of preparation of the traffic analysis for this document, the application of file for Zone 17 included 132,840 sq. ft. of commercial and industrial uses and is evaulated as such through the remainder of this document. June,2000 IV-7 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Exhibit 19 Zone 10 Non-Residential Phasing Projections Year as of Zone 10 Sq. Status 1/1 Fl Existing 2000 0 2000 0 2001 0 2002 56,954 2003 56,955 2004 56,955 2005 56,955 2006 0 2007 0 2008 0 2009 0 2010 0 2011 0 2012 0 2013 0 2014 0 2015 0 2016 0 2017 0 2018 0 2019 0 2020 0 Total 227,819 June, 2000 IV-8 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 V. ZONE REQUIREMENTS The Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone 10 addresses eleven separate facilities at three levels of analysis. Facility City Admin. Facilities Library Wastewater Treatment Capacity Park Drainage Circulation Fire Open Space Schools Sewer Collection Water Distribution Citywide X X X Level of Analysis Quadrant X X X X X X X X Each of these facilities is evaluated to determine conformance with the adopted performance standard. For each facility, the following is provided: a. An illustrative map showing facilities discussed in the section and district boundaries; b. The adopted service level performance standard which must be complied with at all times as development occurs; c. A detailed facility adequacy and planning analysis; d. A list of conditions necessary to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard; e. A discussion of mitigation measures and financing mechanisms. Citywide facilities (City Administrative, Library, and Wastewater Treatment) have been analyzed in the 1986 CFIP. Analyses of these facilities are also included in this Local Facilities Management Plan to verify compliance with the 1986 CFIP or to suggest alternatives that assure conformance with the adopted performance standard. This plan shows how each adopted performance standard will be complied with as development occurs within Zone 10. This plan includes financing of all public facilities and services. The plan also includes a complete facility phasing schedule which is linked to public facility demands within the zone. June, 2000 V-1 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 VI. CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES A. · PERFORMANCE STANDARD 1,500 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS June, 2000 This analysis provides an inventory of existing and programmed City Administrative Facilities owned and leased by the City of Carlsbad. These facilities include both permanent and temporary structures. This analysis projects the build out demand for City Administrative Facilities and determines compliance with the adopted performance standard. Exhibit 20 shows the location of the existing and future City Administrative Facilities. 1. INVENTORY a. Existing and Build Out City Administrative Demand: Citywide projected population and Zone 10 projected population comes from Exhibit 14. Existing {l/1/00) Citywide Zone 10 Build Out Citywide (2020) Zone IO (2020) Projected Population 83,420 0 112,284 2,499 Performance Standard Demand (Sq.Ft.) 125,130 0 168,426 3,749 VI-1 City of Oceanside LEGEND □ Existing O Proposed City of Encinitas k City Administrative Facilities Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan ■ City of San ■ ■ City of ■ Encinitas \.....ri_.■ Exhibit 20 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 b. Inventory of Existing City Administrative Facilities: The existing City Administrative Facilities owned or leased by the City of Carlsbad as of January I, 2000 are: Permanent Temporary Leased (Sq Ft) (Sq Ft) (Sq Ft) Civic Center (1200 Carlsbad Village Drive) Main Building 12,899 Redevelopment 3,200 (2965 B Roosevelt) Administrative Services & Community Development (1635 Faraday): 62,000 Public Safety and Service Center (I) (2560 Orion Way): Police and Fire 53,700 Vehicle Maintenance 10,358 Water District Office 18,000 ------------------------SUBTOTAL 156,957 0 3,200 TOT AL EXISTING FACILITIES 160,157 Existing City Administrative Facilities as of January 1, 2000 exceed the performance standard. However, 2.6 percent of the total square footage is leased. If the leases are terminated, thereby reducing existing City Administrative Facilities, this analysis would need to be re-done to assess compliance with the adopted performance standard. If compliance was not being maintained, all residential development in the City would be stopped until the appropriate mitigation could be implemented. VI-3 2. Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 c. Inventory of Approved Future City Administrative Facilities: The adopted 2001-2002 Capital Improvement Program1 funds the following City Administrative Facilities for construction: Funding Facility Sq. Feet Year Cost Source Public Works 62,000 '01-'02 $15,825,000 CFO/ Sewer Center and Water Replacement New City 96,000 '05-' 10 $26,612,000 CFO Hall No other City Administrative Facilities are identified within the City's adopted CIP. Existing City Administrative Facilities plus those scheduled for construction within five years in the adopted 2001-2002 CIP are as follows: Permanent Temporary Leased (Sq Ft) (Sq Ft) (Sq Ft) Existing 156,957 0 3,200 2001-2002 CIP 62,000 0 0 SUBTOTAL 218,957 0 3,200 TOT AL FACILITIES 222,157 PHASING The citywide residential phasing projections in Exhibit 14 are incorporated into Exhibit 21. Exhibit 21 projects the adequacy of City Administrative Facilities on a citywide basis by comparing the projected facility demand with existing and funded facilities. Analysis of Exhibit 21 shows that City Administrative Facilities currently meet the performance standard and that the facilities are projected to conform to the performance standard through build out. 1The adopted 2001-2002 CIP cost figures include the adopted Mello-Roos Community Facilities District projects and revenues. June,2000 VI-4 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Analysis of Zone 1 O's demand on City Administrative Facilities as of 1-1- 00 indicates no mitigation is needed at this time. The performance standard is currently being conformed to and is projected to conform through build out. The yearly monitoring program will assure that the adopted performance standard is complied with through build out. In the event that the yearly monitoring program shows the adopted performance standard is not being met at any time, or that a financial guarantee for needed facilities is not in place, development in Zone 10 will be stopped until the City Council takes action to finance and construct additional Administrative Facilities. C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 10 No special conditions. D. FINANCING June,2000 A combination of Public Facilities Fees (PFF), Sewer Fees, and the Citywide Mello Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) will be used to fund the following projects: Public Works Center $15,825,000 (CFO/Sewer/ Water) City Hall -Future $26,612,000 (CFD) -----------TOTAL $42,437,000 Zone 10 will contribute to the funding of City Administration Facilities through the payment of Public Facilities Fees (PFF), Sewer Fees and participation in the Citywide Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. Other than these standard contributions, no special financing mechanisms for City Administrative Facilities will be required as a condition of development within Zone I 0. Exhibit 22 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. VI-5 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 21 Phasing of City Administrative Facilities Residential Dwelling Units Phasing Adequacy Analysis Projected Citywide Projected Years as of In Other In Total Zones Zones Admln Adequacy/ Status 1/1 Zones In Zone 10 Zones Population Demand Supply (Inadequacy) Existing 2000 35,991 0 35,991 83,420 125,130 222,157 97,027 Proposed 2000 1,026 0 1,026 85,798 128,697 222,157 93,460 2001 1,118 150 1,268 88,737 133,105 222,157 89,052 2002 950 150 1,100 91,287 136,930 222,157 85,227 2003 813 150 963 93,519 140,278 222,157 81,879 2004 782 150 932 95,679 143,518 222,157 78,639 2005 661 150 811 97,559 146,338 222,157 75,819 2006 669 150 819 99,457 149,185 222,157 72,972 2007 590 150 740 101,172 151,758 222,157 70,399 2008 625 28 653 102,685 154,028 222,157 68,129 2009 648 0 648 104,187 156,281 222,157 65,876 2010 503 0 503 105,353 158,030 222,157 64,127 2011 461 0 461 106,422 159,633 222,157 62,524 2012 461 0 461 107,490 161,235 222,157 60,922 2013 458 0 458 108,552 162,828 222,157 59,329 2014 389 0 389 109,453 164,180 222,157 57,977 2015 302 0 302 110,153 165,230 222,157 56,927 2016 311 0 311 110,874 166,311 222,157 55,846 2017 281 0 281 111,526 167,288 222,157 54,869 2018 176 0 176 111,934 167,900 222,157 54,257 2019 136 0 136 112,249 168,373 222,157 53,784 2020 15 0 15 112,284 168,426 222,157 53,731 TOTAL 47,366 1,078 48,444 112,284 168,426 222,157 53,731 June,2000 VI-6 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 22 Zone 10 City Administrative Financing Matrix Funding Option• Facllltv Amount EsUm•tlld Cost Tlmlna Flnlt Second Third Notff Cltv Administration 1. Public Works Center 62,000 sf $2,200,000 2001-2002 Sewer -Design/Construction $9,025,000 2000-2002 CFD(1) Water -Oesign/Construction $4,600,000 2001-2002 Replacement 2. New City Hall 96,000sf $26,612,000 2005-2010 CFD(1) TOTAL CITY ADMINISTRATION COSTS $42,437,000 Notes: ( 1) CFO • Community F acillties District June,2000 VI-7 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 VII. LIBRARY FACILmES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD 800 square feet per 1,000 population must be scheduled for construction within a five year period. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS June, 2000 This analysis provides an inventory of existing and approved library facilities owned and leased by the City of Carlsbad. This analysis projects the build out demand for library facilities and determines compliance with the adopted performance standard. Future citywide library facility demand is projected based on the 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program, adopted LFMP's and Zone 10 LFMP's projections. Exhibit 23 shows the location of existing and future library facilities. 1. INVENTORY a. Existing and Build Out Library Demand: Citywide projected population and Zone 10 projected population comes from Exhibit 14. Existing (1/1/00) Citywide Zone 10 Build Out Citywide (2020) Zone 10 (2020) Projected Population 83,420 0 112,284 2,499 Performance Standard Demand (Sq.Ft.) 66,736 0 89,827 2,000 VII-1 City of Oceanside LEGEND □ Existing 0 Proposed lrt Libraries ··1- \/\\\09e r~= o I r I I City of Encinitas Zone 1 O Local Facilities Management Plan : City of -r7 ■ City of San Marcos ■ ■ ·'--n. .. Exhibit 23 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 b. Inventory of Existing Library Facilities: Existing library facilities owned and leased by the City of Carlsbad as of January 1, 2000 are the following: Facility Cole Library (1200 Carlsbad Village Drive) South Carlsbad Library (1775 Dove Lane) Adult Learning Center (1207 Carlsbad Village Drive) Centro (3333 Harding Street) Warehouse (2075 Corte de Nogal) TOTAL TOTAL EXISTING FACILITIES Owned (Sq Ft) 24,600 64,000 0 0 0 88,600 c. Inventory of Approved Future Library Facilities: Cole Library Build Out Expansion: Leased (Sq Ft) 0 0 1,300 900 2,060 4,260 92,860 The 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program shows funds for construction of the Cole Library Expansion in 2005+. This expansion will provide approximately 20,500 square feet of additional library space. The following is a summary of the 2000-2001 Capital Improvement Program 1 funding allocation for library facilities: 1The 2000-2001 CIP includes the recently adopted Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) projects and revenues. June, 2000 VII-3 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Cole Library Expansion -Build Out: Description Funding Year Expansion 2005+ $ 12.9 million 2. PHASING To assess when the threshold for future library facilities will be reached, the phasing projections on Exhibit 14 are used. These phasing projections are incorporated into Exhibit 24. Exhibit 24 projects the adequacy of library facilities on a citywide basis by comparing the projected facility demand with existing and funded facilities. Analysis of Exhibit 24 shows that library facilities currently meet the performance standard and that the facilities are projected to conform to the performance standard until build out. 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Analysis of Zone 1 O's demand on library facilities as of 1/1/00 indicates no mitigation is needed at this time. The performance standard is currently being conformed to and is projected to conform through build out. The yearly monitoring program will assure that the adopted performance standard is complied with through build out. In the event that the yearly monitoring program shows the adopted performance standard is not being met at any time, or that a :financial guarantee for needed facilities is not in place, development in Zone 10 will be stopped until the City Council talces action to finance and construct additional library facilities. C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 10 No special conditions. June, 2000 VII-4 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 D. FINANCING Cole Library: June,2000 The Citywide Mello-Roos Community Facilities District includes $4,608,000 and the Public Facilities Fees includes $8,320,000 for the construction of the Cole Library build out expansion in 2005+. This will provide an additional 20,555 square feet of library space at the existing library on 1250 Carlsbad Village Drive for a total of 45,155 square feet. Exhibit 25 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. VII-5 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXIDBIT 24 Library Facilities Phasing Residential Dwelling Units Phasing Adequacy Analysis Projected Citywide Projected Yearsasol In other In Total Zones Zones Library Adequacy/ Status 1/1 Zones In Zone 10 Zones Population Demand Supply (Inadequacy) Existina 2000 35,991 -35,991 83,420 66,736 88,600 21,864 Proposed 2000 1,026 -1,026 85,798 68,638 88,600 19,962 2001 1,118 150 1,268 88,737 70,990 88,600 17,610 2002 950 150 1,100 91,287 73,029 88,600 15,571 2003 813 150 963 93,519 74,815 88,600 13,785 2004 782 150 932 95,679 76,543 109,155 32,612 2005 661 150 811 97,559 78,047 109,155 31,108 2006 669 150 819 99,457 79,565 109,155 29,590 2007 590 150 740 101,172 80,938 109,155 28,217 2008 625 28 653 102,685 82,148 109,155 27,007 2009 648 -648 104,187 83,350 109,155 25,805 2010 503 -503 105,353 84,283 109,155 24,872 2011 461 -461 106,422 85,137 109,155 24,018 2012 461 -461 107,490 85,992 109,155 23,163 2013 458 -458 108,552 86,841 109,155 22,314 2014 389 -389 109,453 87,563 109,155 21,592 2015 302 -302 110,153 88,123 109,155 21,032 2016 311 -311 110,874 88,699 109,155 20,456 2017 281 -281 111,526 89,220 109,155 19,935 2018 176 -176 111,934 89,547 109,155 19,608 2019 136 -136 112,249 89,799 109,155 19,356 2020 15 -15 112,284 89,827 109,155 19,328 TOTAL 47,366 1,078 48,444 112,284 89,827 109,155 19,328 June,2000 VII-6 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 25 Library Financing Matrix Funding Options Faculty Amount Esllmated Cost Timing Flnt Second Third Ubrary Facilities 1. Cole Library Build Out Ellpanslon 20,555 sf $12,928,000 2005+ CFO/ PFF (1)(2) TOTAL LIBRARY COSTS $1 Z,921,000 Notes: (1) PFF • Public Fac:1111)1 Fee■ (2) CFO • Community FaclHtie■ Dlstrtct June, 2000 VII-7 Local Facilities Management Plan •Zone 10 VIII. WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Sewer treatment plant capacity is adequate for at least a five-year period. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS 1. INVENTORY Wastewater Treatment in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three independent agencies: The City of Carlsbad Sewer Service District, Leucadia County Water District (LCWD) and Vallecitos Water District as shown on Exhibit 27. Wastewater Treatment is provided primarily at the Encina Wastewater Authority (EWA) and also at satellite treatment facilities. Ownership as well as wastewater treatment capacity of the EWA is shared on a percentage basis by six independent sewer districts. Exhibit 26 lists the six agencies and their permitted treatment capacity to the EWA as follows: EXHIBIT 26 Encina Water Authority Capacity Analysis1 Capacity at Encina Remaining Treatment Agency WPCF(MGD) Existing Flow (MGD) Capacity Notes: (1) Vista 8.05 6.49 1.56 Carlsbad 9.24 6.31 2.93 Buena 2.26 1.27 0.99 Vallecitos 7.54 4.59 2.95 Leucadia 7.11 4.06 3.05 Encinitas 1.80 0.96 0.84 TOTAL 36.00 23.68 12.32 Note: 1. From November 2000 Encina Flow and EDU Report June, 2000 Currently, the EWA has capacity to treat 36.0 million gallons per day (MGD). Ultimately, this facility will be able to treat up to 54 MGD. Capacity at the EWA is separated into two categories: Treatment capacity and outfall capacity. This analysis will deal primarily with treatment capacity. VIII-1 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 The Encina Ocean Outfall is a drainage line that transports the treated sewage ( effluent) from the EWA and satellite facilities and discharges approximately 8,900 feet into the Pacific Ocean. Currently, the Encina Ocean Outfall system has sufficient capacity to dispose of the estimated peak flows with an average flow of 38 million gallons per day (MGD) capacity. The outfall capacity is shared by six sewer districts and is projected to provide sufficient capacity to the year 2010. Outfall capacity just as treatment capacity, is shared on a percentage basis by the six sewer service districts. a. Existing Facilities: Primary treatment capacity is provided through EWA which is a regional facility owned by six member agencies. The current rate of capacity of EWA is 36.0 MGD of which Carlsbad owns 9.24 MGD. 2. PHASING Exhibit 28 shows the existing and projected demand and treatment capacity for Carlsbad Sewer Service District. Existing demand is 6.31 MGD1 with current capacity at the EWA at 9.24 MGD. a Phasing and Service Demand Wastewater treatment service area population projections for the EWA service district is depicted in the following chart: 'Carlsbad Sewer Service District currently assumes a flow rate of220 gallons/EDU. June,2000 VIII-2 3. Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone I 0 ENCINA WATER AUTHORITY PLAN SEWER SERVICE AREA POPULATION PROJECTIONS2 Year Service 2000 2005 2010 Vista3 60,600 64,300 68,100 Carlsbad 81,500 94,000 106,500 Buena 24,100 26,600 29,100 Vista4 6,100 6,100 6,100 V allecitoss 61,500 73,000 84,500 Leucadia 74,000 83,000 92,000 Encinitas 16,600 18,400 20,200 TOTAL 324,400 365,400 406,500 ADEQUACY FINDINGS Exhibit 28 estimates the necessary treatment capacity needed to accommodate growth within the Carlsbad sewer service area to the year 2010. There is currently a request to adjust the sewer district boundaries, as shown on Exhibit 72. The minor adjustment will result in approximately 60 potential units being transferred to LCWD from CSSD. The adjustment does not represent a significant impact to wastewater for either district. C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS The following action shall be pursued jointly by each sewer district to ensure adequate wastewater treatment capacity throughout a five-year period: Monitor Encina treatment plant flows on a monthly basis to determine actual flow rates and to have an early warning of capacity problems. 2 From Encina Water Pollution Control Facility 2020 Facilities Plan. 3 Includes portion of Oceanside served by Vista 4 Portion of City of Vista within the Buena Sanitation District service area 5 Includes projected CSUSM populations June,2000 VIIl-3 City of Oceanside Calavera Hills Reclamation/Treatment Facility (Existing but not Operational) ---i·~= I I I LEGEND IJ Existing ··7., Leucadia Water Dist ater City of San Marcos .... • • City of • Encinitas '--r,_.■ .... •• • District Boundary . k Wastewater Facilities Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 27 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 28 Carlsbad Sewer Service Area Demand and Available Wastewater Treatment Capacity Flow at 187 Encina Adequacy/ End of Service GPO/EDU Capacity (Inadequacy) Status Year Area EDU's (MGD) {MGD) (MGD) Notes: (1) Existing (1) 2000 33,738 6.31 9.24 2.93 Projected (2) 2001 34,919 6.53 9.24 2.71 2002 36,100 6.75 9.24 2.49 2003 37,281 6.97 9.24 2.27 2004 38,462 7.19 9.24 2.05 2005 39,643 7.41 9.24 1.83 2006 40,824 7.63 9.24 1.61 2007 42,005 7.85 9.24 1.39 2008 43,186 8.08 9.24 1.16 2009 44,367 8.30 9.24 0.94 2010 45,548 8.52 9.24 0.72 Notes: 1 From November 2000 Encina Flow and DU Report 2 Projected based on 3.5 growth rate from page 3-15 of the October 1997 Sewer Master Plan Update for the Carlsbad Municipal Water District by Carollo Engineers D. FINANCING June,2000 Sewer connection fees provide the primary source of funding for both sewer line upgrades and expansion of treatment plant capacity. The timing of sewer facilities upgrades and the mechanism of financing are critical to analysis of the adequacy of funding for plant expansion. Carlsbad Sewer Service District has projected Capital Improvement funds to provide for needed facilities. Exhibit 29 shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP monies available for the facility and the future funding options. VIII-5 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 29 Waste Water Financing Matrix Faclllty Wastewater Facilities Encina Plant Rehabilitation Flow Equalization Project Encina Phase V Expansion TOTAL WASTEWATER COSTS Estimated Cost $2,747,708 $5,018,856 $6,520,343 $14,286,907 Timing 2000+ 2001-2010 2000-2002 First Sewer Replace Sewer Fees Sewer Fees Note: Estimated costs based on the "2000-2001 to Buildout Capital Improvement Program" June,2000 Funding Options Second Third VIII-6 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone I 0 IX. PARK FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Three acres of Community Park or Special Use Area per I 000 population within the park district must be scheduled for construction within a five-year period. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS June,2000 Park facilities are addressed on a Park District basis. There are four park districts which correspond to the four quadrants of the City. Zone 10 is located in Park District 4 as shown on Exhibit 30. 1. INVENTORY a. Existing and Build Out Park Demand: The projected population for Park District 4 comes from Exhibit 14. Existing (1/1/00) Park District 4 Zone 10 Build Out Park District 4 (2020) Zone 10 (2020) Projected Population 29,017 0 39,604 2,499 Performance Standard Demand (acre) 87.05 0 118.81 7.50 IX-1 City of Oceanside .. ---,_ -Ji\\09 8 r~= o I LEGEND 3 District Designation r District Boundary 11 Park Districts r I I Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan : City of -· Vista ■ City of San ■ ■ City of E n c i n i t a s •, -'--IL.■• Exhibit 30 b. Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Inventory of Existing Park Facilities In Park District 4: The inventory of existing parks listed below was approved on September 1991 by the Parks and Recreation Commission. The location of these parks are shown on Exhibit 31. These are the following: Community Parks ~ Ownershi:Q Acres La Costa Canyon Active City 12.34 Stagecoach Active City 28.0 Leo Carillo Passive City 26.9 Subtotal 67.24 S12ecial Use Areas ~ Ownershi:Q Acres Cadencia Active City 2.0 El Fuerte Active City 3.6 La Costa Heights Elementary1 (Levante Elem.) Active EUESD 5.4 La Costa Meadows Elementary (Fuerte Elem.) Active SMUSD 2.0 ----------- Subtotal 13.0 TOTAL EXISTING PARK FACILITIES 80.24 In addition, Appendix A-3 contains the adopted 1996 Parks Agreement between Real Estate Collateral Management and the City of Carlsbad which maintains an irrevocable offer of dedication for 32.9 acres of parkland for Alga Norte Park located within Zone 10. This dedication/acquisition of land will allow the park supply to conform with the adopted performance standard. 1An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the Encinitas Union Elementary School District (EUESD) is contained in Appendix A-2. 2An existing joint use agreement between the City of Carlsbad and the San Marcos Unified School District (SMUSD) is contained in Appendix A-2. June, 2000 IX-3 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 c. Inventory of Approved Future Park Facilities An inventory of projected park facilities was approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission on October 16, 1990. The location of these parks are shown on Exhibit 31. The following parks are listed in the inventory but are scheduled for construction within five years in the adopted 2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan: Future Community Parks ~ Alga Norte Park Active Veterans Memorial Park Act./Passive (Citywide Park: 25% credit per Quadrant) TOTAL FUTURE PARK.FACILITIES Ownership City City Acres 32.9 25.0 57.9 d. Projected Build Out Adequacy/Inadequacy of Park Facilities: 80.24 acres of existing park facilities can be applied toward meeting the adopted parks performance standard. The 57.9 acres of projected future park facilities are proposed as part of the 2000- 2001 CIP. Assuming these proposed facilities are scheduled and funded for construction prior to build out, the projected build out adequacy/inadequacy of park facilities in Park District 4 is as follows: Existing Facilities Proposed Future Facilities Total Build Out Park Facilities Park District 4 Build Out Demand Projected Park District 4 Adequacy 2. PHASING 80.24 acres +57 .90 acres 138.14 acres -118.81acres + 19.33acres Exhibit 32 shows Park District 4 supply and demand based on Park District 4 population projections. Exhibit 32 shows that existing park facilities conform to the performance standard in Park District 4 until build out with the proposed mitigation. IX-4 City of Oceanside ··---i... 'Ji\\09e r~= LEGEND II Community Park (Existing) □ Community Park (Future) e Special Use Area (Existing) 0 Special Use Area (Future) D I ,.. I I City of Encinitas Ir, District 4 Park Locations Zone 1 O Local Facilities Management Plan : City of -· Vista Costa. Elem. City of • City of San Encinitas '-. -'-■-1-...•• Exhibit 31 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Park District 4 conforms with the adopted performance standard through build out with the proposed mitigation. · C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS a. Provide a plan which establishes acceptable access to the Alga Norte park site subject to the approval of the Planning Director, City Engineer and Parks and Recreation Director pursuant to the agreement between the City and the Property owner(s) included as Appendix A-3. b. If at any time the parks performance standard is not complied with within Park District 4, no further residential development will be allowed in Park District 4 or Zone 10 unless actions have been taken by the City to provide additional park facilities. D. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF PARK ACREAGE: June,2000 In addition to the community parks and special use areas listed in the existing and projected inventory, the following joint use areas may be available for use by the public: Joint Use Areas ~ Ownershi2 Acres El Camino Creek Elementary Active EUESD 2.5 Camino De Los Coches Elementary Active EUESD 2.5 La Costa Canyon High School Active SDHSD 10.0 La Costa J. H. Active SDHSD 7.0 TOTAL 22.0 IX-6 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 E. FINANCING June, 2000 The City's approved Capital Improvements Program for the 2000-2001 fiscal year contains the following funding for park facilities in Park District 4: Park Project Alga Norte (Land Acquisition) Alga Norte (Phase I) Alga Norte (Phase II) Leo Carrillo Park (Phase II) Leo Carrillo Parle (Phase III) 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-05 2005-10 $4,800,000 $250,000 $250,000 $5,560,000 $5,300,000 $3,992,000 $1,703,000 The 32.9 acres of Phase I for the Alga Norte Park scheduled for 2001-2002 can be used to meet the adopted performance standard because it is scheduled within five years in the adopted 2000-2001 CIP. The above improvements will be financed by means of a combination of the existing Parks Agreement for the Alga Norte Park and Public Facilities Fees. The Parks Agreement was first entered into between the City and RECM' s predecessor in 1982, prior to the initiation of the Growth Management Program. The agreement was amended in 1988 and 1990 to ensure that Park District 4 would meet the adopted Parks Performance Standard (C.C. Resolution No. 88-52). The current version of the agreement was entered into in 1996. The park site shown on the constraints map is the adopted and approved Alga Norte site pursuant to the current 1996 RECM/City of Carlsbad Parks Agreement. The agreement guarantees the dedication of up to approximately 32.9 acres of park land. This dedication of land will allow the park supply to conform with the adopted performance standard. The 1996 Parks Agreement defines the specific reimbursements to be received by RECM in the event that the City accepts parkland in excess of the amount of the total Parkland Requirement, computed as three park acres per 1,000 population. Excess parkland, if any, shall be determined by subtracting the total Parkland Requirement from the amount of parkland accepted by the City. The total payment due RECM for excess parkland accepted, if any, by the City shall be equal to the amount of excess parkland times $175,000 per acre. The following table shows a facility financing matrix for this facility. This matrix summarizes the individual facility to be financed, its estimated cost and timing of construction, the existing budgeted CIP moneys available for the facility and the future funding options. IX-7 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 32 Phasing of Park Facilities for District 4 Local Facilities Management Zon• Talala Qf LFMP's Adequacy Analysis Total Total Yearly SE Parks SE Parks Adequacy/ PhaMd Projcted Population Total Damancl Supply (Inadequacy) S11tu1 Year 81SE) 10 11 12 17 11 DU'■ DU'■ lnc,...,e Population (Arca■) rAcres) (Acres) Existina 2000 7,688 0 1,885 1,252 0 1,694 12,519 12,519 29,017 29,017 87.05 80.24 -6.81 Proposed 2000 40 0 80 125 0 0 245 12,764 568 28.584 88.75 80.24 -8.51 2001 40 150 210 125 0 0 525 13,289 1,217 30,801 92.40 113.14 20.74 2002 17 150 210 125 0 0 502 13,791 1,164 31,965 95.89 113.14 17.25 2003 17 150 210 38 0 0 415 14,208 982 32,927 a11 113.14 14.38 2004 17 150 21)11 0 0 ~ 378 14,582 871 33,798 101.39 113.14 11.75 Z005 17 150 1111 0 100 19 452 15,034 1,048 34,MI 104.54 138.14 3:1.60 201111 17 150 1111 0 100 0 Cl3 15,487 1,004 35,848 107.55 138.14 30.58 20(11 17 150 1111 0 100 0 Cl3 15,900 1,004 38,853 110.lill 138.14 27.58 20ll8 17 28 1111 0 100 0 311 11,211 721 37,574 112.72 138.14 25.42 2009 17 0 111 0 100 0 285 11,496 1181 38,234 114.70 138.14 23.44 2010 17 0 11 0 100 0 133 11,829 3118 38,543 115.83 138.14 22.51 2011 17 0 15 0 100 0 132 11,711 308 38,848 118.55 138.14 21.59 2012 17 0 15 0 100 0 132 11,893 308 39,155 117.<II 138.14 20.88 2013 17 0 12 0 100 0 129 17,022 299 39,454 118.38 138.14 19.78 2014 18 0 0 0 18 0 34 17,058 79 39,532 118.60 138.14 19.54 2015 18 0 0 0 0 0 11 17,072 37 39,569 118.71 138.14 19.43 2018 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 17,087 35 38,804 111.81 138.14 19.33 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,087 0 38,804 118.81 138.14 19.33 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,087 0 39,804 118.81 138.14 19.33 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,087 0 39,804 118.81 138.14 19.33 Build Oul 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17,087 0 39,804 118.81 138.14 19.3:s TOl,\L 1,019 1,071 3,1114 1,1115 918 1,713 17,017 17,087 0 39,804 111.81 131.14 19.33 June,2000 IX-8 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 33 Park District 4 Financing Matrix Funding Options Facllltv Amount Esdmabld Cost Tlmlna First Second Third Notes Park Facllltln • Citywide Veteran's Memorial Park 25ac $18,129,000 2005-2020 CFDltl Park Facllltln • Park District 4 Parlr Reslatallon $400,000 2010+ PIL-SE Alga Norte Park • Land Acquisition $4,800,000 20()0.2001 PIL-SE Alga Norte Perll • Phaae I 30.0ac $8,080,000 2001-2004 City ·PFF (1)(2) Alga Norte Park • Phase II (50 Meter Pool) $5,300,000 2005-2010 PFF Leo Carrillo Park • Phase II 28.9 $3,992,000 2001 City• PFF Leo Carrillo Park • Phase Ill $1,703,000 2010+ City• PFF TOTAL PARKS COSTS $31,314,000 Notes: (11 Al credlll and Mure reinbursemants are part of Iha Psb agFHmlllt will! Iha RECM. (2) The TOTAL PARKS COSTS does notilclude lhe$2.241,2651Dbe paid byRECM; mwever, Ile TOTAi.PARKS COSTS doelidldelheS2,241,265 tobel'lillblned IDRECM. June,2000 IX-9 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 X. DRAINAGE FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STA.l\lDARD Drainage facilities must be provided as required by the City concurrent with development. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS June,2000 The information contained in this report was obtained from the "Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan" (MDP) for the City of Carlsbad, dated March 1994, from As Built records of existing improvements and. from the proposed improvements of the Villages of La Costa project. The MDP sets forth the revised comprehensive drainage systems on a Citywide basis necessary to meet the overall long-term needs of the City. As was indicated in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, drainage is distinguished from all other public facilities and improvements because by its very nature it is more accurately assessed as specific development plans are finalized. However, certain facilities may be necessary which are larger than those required from a single development project and, therefore, need to be identified so that the proper funding can be collected for the construction of these facilities. The information contained in this report was extracted from the Preliminary Design Study for the Villages of La Costa and from the Drainage Plan entitled, "Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Plan for the City of Carlsbad, California," March, 1994, prepared by the City of Carlsbad Engineering Department. The Master Plan sets forth the comprehensive local drainage system necessary to meet the long-term needs of the city and should be used as a tool in planning for future improvements. Management Zone 10 is shown on sheet 4 of 4 (Dwg. No. 296-5) of the Master Drainage Plan and is within drainage basin "D". Few drainage facilities, either existing or proposed, are shown in Zone 10. This is because the Zone is undeveloped, and drainage facilities will have to be constructed as development progresses. These facilities will be developer financed as a condition of approval with an additional small fee levied on development in order to reimburse the City for capital expenses associated with the Storm Water Testing and Monitoring program. The reasons for using this method of financing over a fee based program for Zone 10 are as follows: 1) Only a small percentage of the drainage facility needs in basin 'D' are attributable to existing deficiencies; 2) The facilities are located on undeveloped land which require their installation in order to make the underlying property suitable for development; and, 3) A majority of the facilities are located within large master plan developments that have the financial capability to fund such facilities without benefit of a fee program. X-1 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 1. INVENTORY a. Existing Facilities Existing Facilities within or adjacent to Zone 10 consist of the following and are shown on Exhibit 34: 1. three 84" RCP, adjacent to and outside the southern boundary of the zone, draining in a southerly direction across Alga Road. 11. one 42" RCP, running parallel to the southern boundary within the Alga Road right-of-way, draining westerly into the three 84" RCP. iii. one 24" and one 36" RCP, running parallel to the southern boundary within the Alga Road right-of-way, draining easterly into the three 84" RCP. 1v. the natural channel draining westerly from the easterly boundary line of Zone 10 and southerly along the easterly edge of La Costa Golf Course into the three 84" RCP. b. Proposed Buildout Facilities Zone 10 is located within Basin D of the MOP and all proposed facilities within the zone are consistent with the MOP. Exhibit 30 shows the major drainage facilities proposed for the development of Zone 10. Proposed Facilities within Zone 10 consist of the following: a. Storm Drain A A 30" storm drain flowing East from future development (Planning Area 1.15) towards the existing La Costa Golf Course. b. Storm Drain B A 30" storm drain and drainage basin flowing East from future development (P.A. 1.15 & 1.16) towards the existing La Costa Golf Course. X-2 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 c. Storm Drain C A 30" storm drain flowing East from future development (P.A. 1.17) towards the existing La Costa Golf Course. d. Storm Drain D A 30" storm drain and drainage basin flowing East from future development (P.A. 1.17) towards the existing La Costa Golf Course. e. Storm Drain E A 36" and 42" storm drain to be built with the construction of Poinsettia Lane from the northwest comer of the existing La Costa Golf Course. The 36" storm drain would intercept the drainage north of Poinsettia Lane and connect with the 42" storm drain that would then carry the drainage from Poinsettia Lane. f. Storm Drain F A 36" storm drain flowing east located along the northern boundary of the site (P.A. 1.4). This storm drain would intercept drainage from the northwest comer of Zone 10 and the southwest comer Zone 17 and flow along the boundary of the future School/Park (P.A. 1.4 and 1.5) site into the proposed natural channel. g. Storm Drain G A 72" storm drain flowing southerly through the central portion of the site. This storm drain will connect with the proposed storm drain from Planning Areas 1.4 and 1.5 and flow under the future intersection of Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road and will outlet southerly into the existing drainage course. h. Storm Drain H 32" and 42" storm drains flowing southwesterly and located at the northerly boundary of the site (P.A. 1.6). The 30" storm drain will intersect flows from the future development within Bressi Ranch in Alicante Road and will flow westerly into a 42" storm drain and will outlet X-3 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 into the existing natural drainage course north of Planning Area 1.4. 1. Storm Drain HA A 30" storm drain flowing westerly from Planning Area 1.6 and connecting to storm drain H. j. Storm Drain I 30" and 36" storm drains flowing easterly and southerly in the northeast comer of Zone 10 through Planning Area 1. 7. The 30" storm drain will collect the drainage from Bressi Ranch to the north. The storm drain will then flow through the future development in this area, will be enlarged to 36" as it crosses Poinsettia Lane and then outlet into the existing natural channel. k. Storm Drain J A 30" storm drain flowing southerly across future Poinsettia Lane from Planning Area 1.7 towards the existing natural drainage course. 1. Storm Drain K Storm drain K will be four 8' high by 12' wide box culverts located at the northeast comer of the La Costa Golf Course in Alicante Road. The box culverts will carry the drainage from the existing natural drainage course under the future extension of Alicante Road. m. Storm Drain L 42", 48" and 60" storm drains flowing westerly and northerly towards the natural drainage course along La Costa Golf Course through Alicante Road and Planning 1.12. The 42" storm drain will intercept the drainage from the existing development to the east and will be increased to 48" and then to 60" as it collects drainage from within the future development in this area. n. Storm Drain LA 36" and 48" storm drains in Planning Area 1.8 flowing westerly and southerly, collecting drainage from the X-4 2. June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 existing development at the east and connecting to storm drain L. o. Storm Drain LB 30" and 36" storm drains will be required within this area of future development (P.A. 1.9). This lies in the central portion of the site and flows southerly to connect to line L. p. Storm Drain LC A 30" storm drain flowing north towards storm drain L (P.A. 1.12). q. Storm Drain M A 30" and 42" storm drains and drainage basin are located within the future development east of the La Costa Golf Course (P.A. 1.10). The lines will flow southwesterly collecting drainage from the development and outlet into the existing drainage course. r. Storm Drain N 36" and 42" storm drains flowing southerly towards the existing 42" storm drain in Alga Road. The lines are located in the southeast comer Zone 10 and serves not only the future development (P.A. I.I 1, 1.13 & 1.14) in this area but also drainage from the existing development to the east. s. Storm Drain NA A 30" storm drain flowing southerly within the southeast comer of Zone 10 and connecting with storm drain N (P.A. 1.14). The location and size of the proposed storm drain facilities have been approximated for the purposes of this plan. The actual locations and sizes will be further defined as the surrounding area develops and the storm runoff is analyzed according to current design standards. PHASING The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facilities Management Plan is based on ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or concurrent with development. The watershed boundary covers the entire X-5 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Zone 10 area and correlate with the natural drainage basin for the area that includes Zone 17 and 18. Thresholds for the major drainage facilities within this watershed can be easily established, thereby determining the appropriate timing and mitigation measures. Exhibit 34 contains the anticipated phasing of the drainage facilities within Zone 1 0. 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Presently, there are three 84" RCP storm drains adjacent to and southeast of Zone 10; one 42" RCP storm drain and one 36" RCP storm drain located within the Alga Road right-of-way adjacent to and southeast of Zone 10 which will handle runoff from the existing natural watershed. There will be no need for proposed facilities until development occurs. Major drainage facilities will be a condition to the approval of future development in Zone 10 so that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. X-6 LEGEND I O I Drainage Basins f ·····---·! Existing Storm Drain I 1---1 Proposed Storm Drain , ......... I- Existing Drainage Course ;\\ 1.9 Proposed Drainage Course • (4) 8' x 12' Box Culvert CJ Detention Basins @ Phase 1 (Drain Size) (~~ Phase 2 (Drain Size) ,. ... 1~) Phase 3 (Drain Size) ~l Drainage Facilities Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan ---, I I I I ,)1 ( / ( .. r7J '\_,_ / ~ .... , .. / \ I I /.~, { 2' ) I ( I l ( ® \ Exhibit 34 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 C. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. All future development in Zone 10 will be required to construct any future Zone 10 storm drain facilities identified in the Drainage Master Plan as determined by the City Engineer and from the proposed improvements of the Villages of La Costa project. Any facilities necessary to accommodate an individual phase of future development must be financially guaranteed or provided for prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit whichever occurs first, for any development phase requiring future storm drain facilities in Zone 10. 2. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any specific sub-drainage area within Zone I 0, the developers of that project are required to: a. Pay the required drainage area fees established in the current Drainage Master Plan. 3. Prior to the recordation of any final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first for any project within Zone 10, the developers of that project are required to financially guarantee the construction of the following storm drain facilities that are determined to be required for the current development phase, as shown on Exhibit 34: 3a. Storm Drain A (P.A. 1.15) 3b. Storm Drain B & drainage basin (P.A. 1.15 & 1.17) 3c. Storm Drain C (P.A. 1.17) 3d. Storm Drain D & drainage basin (P.A. 1.17) 3e. Storm Drain E (Poinsettia Lane) 3f. Storm Drain F (P.A.1.4) 3 g. Storm Drain G (Poinsettia Lane) 3h. Storm Drain H (P.A. 1.6 & Alicante Road) 3i. Storm Drain HA (P.A. 1.6) 3 j. Storm Drain I (P.A. 1.17) 3k. Storm Drain J (P.A. 1.17 & Poinsettia Lane) 31. Storm Drain K (Alicante Road) 3m. Storm Drain L (Alicante Road & P.A. 1.12) 3n. Storm Drain LA (P.A. 1.8) 3o. Storm Drain LB (P.A. 1.9) 3p. Storm Drain LC (P.A. 1.12) June, 2000 X-8 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 3q. Storm Drain M & drainage basin (P.A. 1.10) 3r. Storm Drain N (P.A. 1.14 & Alicante Road) 3s. Storm Drain NA (P.A. 1.14) D. FINANCING June, 2000 The cost of the proposed storm drains within Zone 10 is estimated to be $1,887,068. An itemized cost estimate of these facilities is contained in Exhibit 35. This estimate should only be used as a guide to approximate costs for preliminary planning purposes. Further cost analysis should be made as planning and design progresses in Zone 10. The Master Drainage Plan (MDP) states that the primary method of financing drainage facilities within basin 'D' is through direct developer construction as a condition of development approval. In addition, the MDP provides that a small administrative fee will be levied on development within basin 'D' in order to reimburse the City for capital expenses associated with the Storm Water Testing and Monitoring Program. The MDP also states that it may be necessary to establish additional local benefit assessment districts to reimburse developers on a facility-by-facility basis. There are currently no MDP facilities within Zone 10 that qualify for fee credits. The drainage facility, shown as an open drainage channel on Ex 34, north of Poinsettia Lane and adjacent to Alicante Road, will facilitate drainage from future development in the northeast comer of Zone 10 along with a major portion of Zone 17. The constructing party may request the City to establish a method to distribute the proportional cost of this facility to all future development within the drainage basin. X-9 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 35 Drainage Facilities Cost Estimates -Part 1 Facility Drainage Facllltles Sloml Drain "G" 7Z'RCP Curo lriets Clealouts Headwalls Rip-Rap SUBTOTAL + 15 % CONTINGENCY FEE SU8TOTAL + 15 % ADMINISTRATIVE & ENGINEERING STORMDRAIN •G" TOTAL Stonn Drain "H'" 42"RCP 32"RCP Curo lriets Cleanouts Headwalls Rip-Rap SUBTOTAL + 15 % CONTINGENCY FEE SUBTOTAL + 15 % AOMt..lSTRATIVE & ENGINEERING STORM DRAIN "H" TOTAL Storm Drain "HA• 30"RCP Cwt> Irie! Oeanouts Heedwals Rip/Rap SU8TOTAL + 15 % CONTINGENCY FEE SUBTOTAL + 15 % ADMt..lSTRATIVE & ENGINEERING STORM DRAIN "HA" TOTAL June,2000 Funding Options Amount Estimated Cost Timing Flrst Second Third Notes Concurrent.,. 200LF $52,000 Development l)e,.,eloper" 4EA $14,000 2EA $7,800 1 EA $4,600 $5,000 $83,400 $12,510 $95,910 $19,182 $115,092 Concurrent wl 500LF $75,000 Development l)e,.,eloper" 600LF $63,000 4EA $14,000 4EA $14,440 1 EA $2,200 $3,000 $171,640 $25,746 $197,386 S39,4n $236,863 Concurrent.,. 200LF $21,000 Development l)e,.,eloper" 2EA $7,000 2EA $7,220 1 EA $2,200 $1,000 $38,420 $5,763 $44,183 $8,837 $53,020 X-10 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 35 Drainage Facilities Cost Estimates -Part 2 Funding Optl01111 Faclllty Amount Estlmatlld Cost Tlmlna First s.cond Thlro Notes Drainage Faclllties StonnDraln "I." Concunlnl w/ WRCP 500LF $105,000 Dewlopmant OIMMoper 48"RCP 1,900LF $304,000 . . 42"RCP 900LF $135,000 Curb Inlet 12EA $42,000 Qeanouta 11 EA $39,710 Headwalls 2EA $6,800 Rip-Rap $8,000 SUBTOTAL $640,510 + 15 'Iii CONTINGENCY FEE $96,077 SUBTOTAL $736,587 + 15 'Iii ADMINISTRATIVE & ENGll'EERING $147,317 STORMDRAIN "L" TOTAL $883,904 Storm Drain "I.A" Concunlnt w/ 38"RCP 1700LF $255,000 Dewtopment OeYeloper 48" RCP 750LF $120,000 . . Curb Inlets SEA $28,000 Cleanouts 7EA $25,270 Headwells 1 EA $2,200 Rip/Rap HS $3,000 SUBTOTAL $433,470 + 15 'Iii CONTINGENCY FEE $65,021 SUBTOTAL $4S8,491 + 15 'Iii ADMINISTRATIVE & ENGINEERING $89,698 STORM DRAIN "LA" $598,189 TOTAL DRAINAGE COSTS $1,887,068 June,2000 X-11 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 36 Drainage Facilities Financing Matrix Faclllty Dralnsae Facllltles Stann Drain "G" (72" RCP) Storm Drain "H" (32" & 42" RCP) Storm Crain "HA" (30" RCP) Stonn Crain "L" (42", 48" & 60" RCP) Stonn Crain "LA" (36" & 48" RCP) SEWER COSTS Note: Source: O'Day Consultants, 06/02/2000 June, 2000 Amount Estimated Cost 200LF 1,100LF 200LF 3,300 LF 2,450LF $115,092 $236,863 $53,020 $883,904 $598,189 $1,BB7,0&B Tlmlna Concurent wilh Development . Funding Options Flnlt Second Third Developer Notes LF = Lineal Feet X-12 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 XI. CIRCULATION FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No road segment or intersection in the Zone nor any road segment or intersection out of the Zone which is impacted by development in the Zone shall be projected to exceed a Service Level C during off-peak hours, nor Service Level D during peak hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by the Local Facilities Management Zone will use the road segment or intersection. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS June,2000 The purpose · of the analysis was to determine whether or not the circulation system within Zone 10 conforms to the adopted performance standards. It will also address all Circulation Element road segments and intersections outside of Zone 10 impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by Zone 10 to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard. This section is based on the Traffic Impact Analysis for Local Facilities Management Zone 10 prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LLG), Appendix A-4. The report analyzes existing, 2005, 2010 and city buildout conditions (2020). Assumptions were made in the traffic report as to the location of residential development in each phase. These assumptions were provided to the traffic engineer by the City of Carlsbad and the property owners of Zone 10. Based on these yearly projections, the phasing of Circulation Element roadways located within Zone 10 are identified. The location of proposed development within each phase is for planning purposes only. The actual location and phasing of development may affect the timing for provision of Circulation Element roadways within Zone 10. The financial guarantee for the proposed circulation element roadways will be provided, however, the construction of the facility may not occur until the development requiring the need for the roadways are constructed. In the event that it is determined that circulation facilities need to be accelerated or delayed as a result of changes in the location and/or timing of land use development, the timing of the required roadway improvements may be modified without amendment to this plan. However, any deletions or additions to the list of improvements anticipated herein will require amending this plan. XI-I June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 1. INVENTORY a. Circulation Element Roads Within Zone 10 There are four circulation roadways located within or adjacent to Zone 10. Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road are located within the boundaries of Zone 10, while El Camino Real and Alga Road are outside but adjacent to the Zone. El Camino Real is designated as a six-lane prime arterial. Poinsettia Lane and Alga Road are designated as four-lane major arterials. Alicante Road is designated as a two-lane collector. b. Identification oflmpacted Road Segments and Intersections As stated in the performance standard, impacted road segments and intersections are those that have 20% or more of the Zone 10 traffic using them. It is possible that certain road segments or intersections will not be analyzed for each study year since the construction of additional road segments may decrease the distribution on a road segment below the 20% distribution threshold, from a previous study year. The Zone 10 distribution is determined by a Select Zone Assignment (SZA) from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Buildout 2020 Cities/County and Carlsbad Subarea Model. Exhibits 37, 38 and 39 (following the text) show the estimated distribution of Zone 10 traffic on the roadway system for the Years 2005, 2010 and buildout conditions. The road segments and intersections that are impacted by 20% of Zone 10 traffic are listed below. These facilities were evaluated to determine the geometry necessary to meet the Level of Service performance standards. The intersection numbers are the same as in the Villages of La Costa EIR, explaining the nonsequential order. Road Segments El Camino Real: s/o Alga Road Poinsettia Lane: El Camino Real to El Fuerte St Classification Six-lane Prime Four-lane Major XI-2 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 Road Segments Alga Road: El Camino Real to Alicante Road Alicante Road: Northerly Boundary to Alga Road Intersections 7) El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane Classification Four-lane Major Two-lane Collector 8) El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway/Alga Road 39) Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Road 40) Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street 41) Alga Road/ Alicante Road 2. PHASING The traffic analysis prepared by LLG is a detailed study dealing with the specific traffic generated from within the boundaries of Zone 10. This study analyzes the impacts of traffic on existing and proposed road segments and intersections impacted by Zone 10. The report also proposes a mitigation plan to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard through buildout. The traffic analysis uses the proposed roadway system and intersection geometrics for existing conditions and the Years 2005, 2010 and 2020 conditions as outlined by the City of Carlsbad. The time increments are used more as benchmarks than actual completion dates. If a future traffic analysis indicates that the timing of the necessary improvements needs to be accelerated, or that the timing is premature, the required improvements must also be adjusted to guarantee that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. Existing conditions were determined by performing peak hour counts at study intersections. The Years 2005, 2010 and 2020 were evaluated using data developed from the SANDAG/Buildout 2020 Cities/County and Carlsbad Subarea computer traffic forecast model. The street segment classifications show the peak hour volume per lane of the street segment, the existing peak hour volume to capacity (V /C) ratio, and the street segment Level of Service (LOS) without mitigation and with XI-3 ~ "' AVIARA PKWY ................ ) ................. , .......... J ................... , ::::::::·1 .......... J · ................ , :::::::.1 ·::::::i LEGEND [';.".:'.] -Indicates Zone 1 0 Area LINSCOTT LA\'\/ & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS REV. 10/13/00 SOURCE: SANDAG (03/22/00) XX% LLG723U5.DWG 11 2005 Zone 10 Trip Distrubution Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 O -Indicates distribution percentage NO SCALE Exhibit 37 AVIARA PKWY LINSCOTT LA\!V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS REV. 10/13/00 SOURCE: SANDAG (03/22/00) ~ /., .. ::::::::i ::::::::·, ·:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:-:1 ......... t ................. 1 .......... J • ••••••• .t ....... , ·•:•:•:·:·:·:·i LEGEND t" rrr .. " I ••JJJ••·· XX% ILG723U5.DWG lrt 2010 Zone 10 Trip Distribution Local Facilities Management Plan Zone l O -Indicates Zone 1 0 Area -Indicates distribution percentage NO SCALE Exhibit 38 ~ AVIARA PKWY .::•:•:•:·:·:·:•) ::::::::·1 ·:.·::::.·.·:J ::::.·::.·:.i ::::::::·1 • ........ J ·:::::::.! :::::::.1 :,:,:•:•:•:•:•i LEGEND [."."."::·."J -Indicates Zone 10 Area LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS REV. 10/13/00 SOURCE: SANOAG (03/22/00) XX% li"";:o Zone 10 Trip Distribution Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 o -Indicates distribution percentage NO SCALE Exhibit 39 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone I 0 mitigation. The peak hour capacity per lane is assumed as 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane (VPHPL) for the City Surface streets. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate impacted road segments and intersections serving Zone 10 and propose a mitigation plan if these facilities are determined to operate below the adopted performance standard. The phasing of development and analysis of traffic impacts will be monitored on an annual basis. However, for the purpose of this study, the timing of the necessary improvements will be presented in the following increments: • Improvements needed now • Improvements needed prior to 2005 • Improvements needed prior to 2010 • Improvements needed prior to Buildout (2020) The phasing schedule noted above shall not limit needed traffic improvements to the years mentioned. If a future traffic analysis indicates that the timing of the necessary improvements has changed, the required improvements shall also be adjusted either earlier or later to guarantee that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS June,2000 This section will analyze the existing and proposed intersections and road segments affected by the traffic generated from Zone 10. The intersections were analyzed using an Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The calculation sheets are contained in Appendix A-4. The street segments were analyzed using the 1997 Highway Capacity Methodology to determine the operational Level of Service. The performance standard determines that during peak hour a Level of Service A through D as acceptable and a Level of Service of E or worse to be unacceptable. If a facility does not meet the standard, a mitigation program must be prepared so that the facility will operate at an acceptable Level of Service. The proposed mitigation program will be discussed more thoroughly later in this report. Traffic conditions for existing, 2005, 2010 and 2020 are described below. The Level of Service for impacted roadways and intersections are indicated and, if needed, recommended circulation improvement needs are identified. XI-7 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 1. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CIRCULATION CONDITONS a. Existing Conditions, Traffic Volumes and Capacity The existing circulation element is shown in Exhibit 40. Existing daily traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 41. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at an unacceptable LOS, as shown in Exhibit 42. Existing peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Exhibit 43. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at an unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 44. XI-8 AV/ARA PKWY LINSCOTT LA\N & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 4 6 (0 [-................. 1 i ................... , /r ·· · · ···· ........ · t ::::2:::::::/1 ',,'·••:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:·:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:;_.. ,L.":::::::::::::::::::::.-:::::::::::::::::.1 ~~/ ............................................ ~ 1-:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:"Tniv:,;.:•:•:,:n•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•1 .................. ,r;,.vJ..v;,..;i;tl' •••••........... 1 \·~;·~-~~;:_:_:;_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:_:] r··························J t .... •L•L4•••:t•••••• .. • .. •••••~ -~:::.·::.·.·:.·.·.g·::: ALGA RO ·,::::::::::::: ···••J.1 41- LEGEND f' .... "" I ····••J•• X ® REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) ILG723U5.DWG r, Existing Circulation Element Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 O -Indicates Zone 1 0 Area -Indicates Number of Lones -Indicates Intersection Number NO SCALE Exhibit 40 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 41 Existing Daily Traffic Volumes (ADT's) Zone 10 STREET SEGMENT DATE 24-HOUR VOLUME (ADT) EL CAMINO REAL s/o Alga Road/ A viara Parkway 1999 35,500 ALGAROAD e/o El Camino Real 1999 9,000 . Source: 1999 Traffic Momtonng Program, Valley Research and Planmng Associates June,2000 XI-10 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXIIlBIT 42 Existing Signalized Intenection Operations Zone 10 INTERSECTION* EXISTING AM ICU 7) El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane ONE 8) El Camino Real/ Alga Road/ Aviara Parkway 0.42 39) Poinsettia Lane/ Alicante Road ONE 40) Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street ONE 41) Alga Road/ Alicante Road 0.46 *The intersection numbers are the same as in the Villages of La Costa EIR DELAY is measured in seconds. LOS = Level of Service ONE = Does Not Exist 1 = El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane -northbound free flow right. 2 = El Camino Real/Alga Road-eastbound right-tum overlap. LOS - A - - A 3 = El Camino Real/Alga Road-eastbound right-tum lane & right-tum over lap. ICU LOS 0.00 > 0.60 A 0.61 to 0.70 B 0.71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F June,2000 PM ICU ONE 0.56 ONE ONE 0.48 LOS - A - - A XI-11 EL CAMINO REAL/ ALGA ROAD ,..,..._ Cl00N -ol"I ...... , ...... 10-,-. IXl~II> '-170/ 85 11 l -281/229 .-•-.. r 393/2s4 212/ 91..) 160/419- 185/258 ", ® LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ALGA ROAD/ AUCANTE ROAD -655/361 , 201 42 264/894-\( 80/273, NOl u,- ............ ,....., U)N .., E-W STREET '.. AM/PM -AM/PM ,AM/PM i "' ¾~ ENGINEERS NO SCALE REV. 06/12/00 "OSA" = Outside Study Area, less than 50 ILG723U9.DWG peak hour project traffic volumes ,, Existing Traffi~n ~~i~;;;n Ad;;~o~ntp;;k· Hours Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 a Exhibit 43 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 44 Existing Peak Hour Segment Operations Zone 10 SEGMENT LANES LINK DIRECTION V/C LOS LANES LINK DIRECTION VIC LOS LOCATION EACH VOLUME EACH VOLUME DIRECTION DIRECTION El Camino Real s/o Alga Road 2 1302 NB 0.36 A 2 1529 SB 0.42 A Alga Parkway e/o El Camino Real 2 1149 EB 0.32 A 2 578 WB 0.16 A w/o Alicante Road 2 1167 EB 0.32 A 2 817 WB 0.23 A Capacity = 1,800 vehrcles per hour per lane in the peak d1reetion. by dlreetion, 1.e. northbound, etc. VIC Ranges LOS 0.0 -0.60 ...A 0.61-0.70 ~ 0. 71 -0.80 s_ 0.81 -0.90 _Q 0.91 -1.00 _g > 1.00 _f June,2000 XI-13 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 2. ANALYSIS OF 2005 CIRCULATION CONDITIONS a. 2005 Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2005 is shown in Exhibit 45. The trip generation for Zone 10 is shown in Exhibit 46. Zone 10 is calculated to generate about 10,980 ADT (5,490 in and 5,490 out), with 420 inbound and 645 outbound trips during the AM peak hour and 700 inbound and 440 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. There is a slight difference between the calculated trip generation from Exhibit 46 and a cordon summary of the trip generation assignment from Exhibit 50. This is due to an internal capture rate of about 15%. Internal capture refers to trips that stay within the Zone. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at an unacceptable LOS, as shown in Exhibit 47; however, several intersections were identified for mitigation in Exhibit 64. These mitigations represent new intersections. Peak hour volumes for 2005 are shown in Exhibit 48. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 49. The ADT volumes for 2005 are shown in Exhibit 50. XI-14 AVIARA PKWY LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 4 REV. 10/ 17 /00 SOURCE: SAN DAG (3/22/00) ~~.~~., ............. ············ ........... :·) ........ , ........ J ........ , ........ , ::::::::1 ........ 1 •:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:1 ::::::.i ............. 1 LEGEND f:':":':":":;'.:'.:l -Indicates Zone 10 Area X -Indicates Number of Lanes NO SCALE Local Facilities Management Plan Zone l O Exhibit 45 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 46 Zone 10 Traffic Generation Year 2005 LAND USE SIZE DAILY TRIP ENDS AM PM (ADT) PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN OUT ADT SPLIT IN OUT Single Family Residential 570 DU 10/DU 5,700 8% 3:7 140 320 10% 7:3 400 170 Multi-Family Residential 180 DU 8/DU 1,440 8% 2:8 20 90 10% 7:3 100 45 Light Industrial 2.6AC 80/AC 210 11% 9:1 10 5 12% 2:8 5 20 Elementary School 7.2AC 60/AC 430 28% 6:4 70 50 7% 3:7 10 20 Active Park 25.8AC 50/AC 1,290 4% 5:5 25 25 4% 5:5 25 25 Community Facilities 5.7 AC 30/AC 170 5% 6:4 5 5 8% 5:5 5 5 Day Care 21,780 SF 80/KSF 1,740 17% 5:5 150 150 18% 5:5 155 155 TOTAL TRIPS --10,980 --420 645 --700 440 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU) and acres. 3. All ADT's are rounded to the nearest 10 and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. June, 2000 XI-16 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 47 Signalized Intersection Operations Zone 10 INTERSECTION* EXISTING AM ICU 7) El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane DNE 8) El Camino Rea1/Alga Road/A viara Parkway 0.42 39) Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Road ONE 40) Poinsettia Lane/E1 Fuerte Street DNE 41) Alga Road/ Alicante Road 0.46 *The mtersectlon numbers are the same as m the Vtllages of La Costa EIR DELAY is measured in seconds. LOS = Level of Service ONE = Does Not Exist June,2000 LOS - A - - A PM ICU LOS DNE - 0.56 A DNE - ONE - 0.48 A ICU 0.00 > 0.61 to 0.71 to 0.81 to 0.91 to > YEAR2005 AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS 0.54 A 0.69 B 0.71 C 0.75 C 0.45 A 0.58 A 0.52 A 0.77 C 0.45 A 0.49 A LOS 0.60 A 0.70 B 0.80 C 0.90 D 1.00 E 1.00 F XI-17 0 EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE .,.,..,_ ......... NN ,.::::. ...... N-IO NOl-,n- .)~~ 97/24..) 40/28-0/ 1, '-.... 282/ 56 -12/ 77 , 426/1386 ALGA ROAD,/ ALICANTE ROAD -o .... NN ...... .::::. ...... ::l .... ~ '-.... 6/ 15 Ji l -450/433 ✓ t ,_, , 5/ 9 10/ 86..) 390/575 -40/466 ", ... .., ... co-,, ...... mco<D "'<D .., LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS EL CAMINO REAL/ ALGA ROAD .,, ...... ,nor--No,-,.::::., (J) ... .., -,n-m .,,,~ 369/ JO..) 185/432- 306/427", ® '-.... 203/ 23 -270/284 , 508/238 (J) ...... Oo,r--.,.IO UJ .................. .,,,...., "'"'"' "'"'"' N POINSETTIA LANE/ ALICANTE ROAD 202/243..) 1280/468-4/ 37 ", '-.... 42/ 18 -5so/1241 , 8/ 165 <J>CON .................. CNN ,,,_,._ REV. 10/17/00 "OSA" = Outside Study Area, less than 50 (c723u9.owG peak hour project traffic volumes 1,, 2005 Traffic V~lue;e~~ir;;,~; ~~;eke~i~~rs Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 O POINSETTIA LANE/ EL FUERTE STRtET ....... .., .., Na, ..,.,._ .................. "'"'"' "'"'"' .,,,~ 111/ 75..) 1228/388-40/ 60 ", E-W STREET '-.... 24/ 12 -439/1072 , 7/ 161 "'0 ... NCO-'-'-'-... .,, ... ...... .,, '-.... AIA/PM -AIA/PM f AM/PM i "' I z NO SCALE Exhibit 48 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone I 0 EXHIBIT 49 2005 Peak Hour Segment Operations Zone 10 SEGMENT LANES LINK DIRECTION V/C LOS LANES LINK DIRECTION V/C LOS LOCATION EACH VOLUME EACH VOLUME DIRECTION DIRECTION El Camino Real s/o Alga Road 3 2903 NB 0.54 A 3 2572 SB 0.48 A Alicante Road n/o Poinsettia Lane 1 279 NB 0.16 A 1 448 SB 0.25 A s/o Poinsettia Lane 1 39 NB 0.02 A 1 290 SB 0.16 A n/o Alga Road 1 114 NB 0.06 A 1 148 SB 0.08 A Poinsettia Lane e/o El Camino Real 2 804 EB 0.22 A 2 1519 WB 0.42 A w/o Alicante Road 2 748 EB 0.21 A 2 1573 WB 0.44 A e/o Alicante Road 2 523 EB 0.15 A 2 1430 WB 0.40 A w/o El Fuerte Street 2 523 EB 0.15 A 2 1431 WB 0.40 A Alga Parkway e/o El Camino Real 2 1280 EB 0.36 A 2 545 WB 0.15 A w/o Alicante Road 2 1127 EB 0.31 A 2 541 WB 0.15 A Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane m the peak direction, by direction, 1.e. northbound, etc. V/C Ranges LOS 1.0 -0.60 ....A 0.61-0.70 ~ 0.71-0.80 _c. 0.81-0.90 ~ 0.91 -1.00 __g > 1.00 ..£ June,2000 XI-19 AVIARA PKWY LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 800 0 0 (0 600 r-_.::·.-:-.7:.::· ::}::/: ·.::::::f.:•:•:•:0 .. :::~~ •••••••••• 1 :.·::::::::·1 •:•.. •:•:•:-:-:-:-:-:-:•:•:•I :-:•:•. :-:•:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:•:! ::::: :::::::::::., -:-:-:-:-: :-:•:•:-:•:•:-:-:-:-:-:-1 :-:•:•:•:•:•. ··:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:l :~{:}f /:: :~({:{~j ::::::::::::::::::::: .... \:::::::::::::::l ··""' ·········· 1-:•:•~.·-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:--2500 ··: ALGA 0 0 N LEGEND -..I 0 0 t-:•:-:-:-:-:-:-:-1 -Indicates Zone 10 Area NOTE: -ADT's are shown midblock Total = 10,980 ADT REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) hs Zone 10 ADT's NO SCALE Local Facilities Management Plan zone 1 O Exhibit 50 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 3. ANALYSIS OF 2010 CIRCULATION CONDITONS a. 2010 Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2010 is shown in Exhibit 51. Trip generation for Zone 10 is shown in Exhibit 52. Zone 10 is calculated to generate about 14,910 ADT (7,455 in and 7,455 out), with 575 inbound and 835 outbound trips during the AM peak hour and 945 inbound and 605 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. There is a slight difference between the calculated trip generation from Exhibit 52 and a cordon summary of the trip generation assignment from Exhibit 64. This is due to an internal capture rate of about 7%. Internal capture refers to trips that stay within the Zone. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS's as shown in Exhibit 53, assuming the 2005 improvements are in place. The 2010 peak hour volumes are shown in Exhibit 54. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 55. The ADT volumes for 2010 are shown in Exhibit 56. XI-21 I 4 AVIARA PKWY LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 4 6 co r::--:.-::;.-?::•:: r.·:::.·:::::: ........... ............ ........... ·:::::::. .7:.7.":7.7:.":"I ........ ············· ........ . .......... . £-:-:f ........... .-.-.-:-:-:-:-:i ::::::::.1 -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-1 ·::::::::i ::::::::.1 -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-! ·::::::::1 ·:::::::.1 ·-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-] ·::::::1 LEGEND f """"j .......... X REV. 10/17 /00 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) fi'3u;;~O Circulation Element Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 O 2 -Indicates Zone 10 Area -Indicates Number of Lones NO SCALE Exhibit 51 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone I 0 EXHIBIT 52 Zone 10 Traffic Generation Year 2010 LAND USE SIZE DAILY TRIP ENDS AM PM (ADT) PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN OUT ADT SPLIT IN OUT Single Family Residential 898 DU 10/DU 8,980 8% 3:7 215 505 10% 7:3 630 270 Multi-Family Residential 180 DU 8/DU 1,440 8% 2:8 25 90 10% 7:3 100 45 Light Industrial 10.7 AC 80/AC 860 11% 9:1 85 10 12% 2:8 20 85 Elementary School 7.2AC 60/AC 430 28% 6:4 70 50 7% 3:7 10 20 Active Park 25.BAC 50/AC 1,290 4% 5:5 25 25 4% 5:5 25 25 Community Facilities 5.7 AC 30/AC 170 5% 6:4 5 5 8% 5:5 5 5 Day Care 21,780 SF 80/KSF 1,740 17% 5:5 150 150 18% 5:5 155 155 TOTAL TRIPS --14,910 --575 835 --945 605 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU) and acres. 3. All ADT's are rounded to the nearest 1 O and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. June, 2000 XI-23 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 53 Signalized Intersection Operations Zone 10 INTERSECTION 7) El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane 8) El Camino Real/Alga Road/Aviara Parkway 39) Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Road 40) Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street 41) Alga Road/Alicante Road DELAY is measured in seconds. LOS = Level of Service ONE = Does Not Exist June, 2000 EXISTING AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ONE -ONE - 0.42 A 0.56 A ONE -ONE - ONE -ONE - 0.46 A 0.48 A YEAR2005 AM ICU 0.54 0.71 0.45 0.52 0.45 PM LOS ICU A 0.69 C 0.75 A 0.58 A 0.77 A 0.49 ICU 0.00 > 0.60 0.61 to 0.70 0.71 to 0.80 0.81 to 0.90 0.91 to 1.00 > 1.00 LOS B C A C A YEAR2010 AM ICU 0.36 0.56 0.47 0.39 0.46 LOS A B C D E F LOS A A A A A PM ICU LOS 0.62 B 0.68 B 0.46 A 0.70 B 0.49 A XI-24 EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE "'"'"' !0(110 _..,_ -.....::::.-.... ............ -r,.N .. .; l '. 290/ 20...) 298/258- 49/ 28 ", 0 ~ 188/ 51 -177/263 r 284/121 ALGA ROAD/ ALICANTE ROAD ..... ..,.., ... .., -.....::::.-.... .,.,.._N "' - 25/ 84..) 306/549- 42/471 ", ~ 6/ 16 -408/459 r 5/ 8 '°"' .... m--....-...., r--oon CIIO ..,_ LINSCOTT LA\N & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS EL CAMINO REAL/ ALGA ROAD .... .., .... ..,..,.,, -•--.....::::. ...... or-,.... N~-~ 190/ 27 J I 1 -253/332 .. •..... , 514/201 190/ 40...) 178/437- 297/372 ", ® POINSETTIA LANE/ ALICANTE ROAD CIICIICII ltlNN N-................ ~ 14/ 10 .......... CD .I l '. -476/824 r 1/150 414/225..) 't; 664/487 - 5/ 34 ", -.... .., .::::.,.::::. .. .,, ... @ ......... Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 1 O POINSETTIA LAN~ EL FUERTE STR ET "'.., .... •r-m _,.. -....-....-.... N..,0 ..,.,.._ .I l '. 101/ 73..) 580/291- 72/134 ", @ ~ 30/ 14 -245/775 , 6/129 ,t; "'"'"' <Dr---....-....-.... ... .. .., OCON ..,...,_ ~ AM/PM -AM/PM ('"AM/PM E-W STREET ... ~ en I z NO SCALE Exhibit 54 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 55 2010 Peak Hour Segment Operations Zone 10 SEGMENT LANES LINK DIRECTION V/C LOS LANES LINK DIRECTION VIC LOS LOCATION EACH VOLUME EACH VOLUME DIRECTION DIRECTION Alicante Road n/o Poinsettia Lane 1 252 NB 0.14 A 1 415 SB 0.23 A s/o Poinsettia Lane 1 41 NB 0.02 A 1 313 SB 0.17 A n/o Alga Road 1 113 NB 0.06 A 1 168 SB 0.09 A Poinsettia Lane e/o El Camino Real 2 810 EB 0.23 A 2 1041 WB 0.29 A w/o Alicante Road 2 746 EB 0.21 A 2 1093 WB 0.30 A Alga Parkway e/o El Camino Real 2 1255 EB 0.35 A 2 566 WB 0.16 A w/o Alicante Road 2 1104 EB 0.31 A 2 582 WB 0.16 A Capacity :: 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak d1recti0n, by d1rect10n, 1.e. northbound, etc. VIC Ranges LOS 2.0 -0.60 _A 0.61 -0.70 .Jl 0.71-0.80 ~ 0.81 -0.90 _Q 0.91 -1.00 .J; > 1.00 __.E June,2000 XI-26 • 7":. 7; .7. 7":. "J ············ ............ . :::::1 ·.-:-:-:-:-:-:-:1 ::::::::! ::::::::i ::::::::.1 :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-i ::::::::i :::::::.1 -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-1 ~ 0 0 0 l::l:lb!t: ·.:.::.,:.:, 1:-:-:r:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: 1 ooo oil' .. · · · · ·.-.:.-___ _:.:;;:;;:.~--T~A~L 7";;~0~ AV/ARA PKWY LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 0 0 f'") N REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) ~;: O Zone 10 ADT's LEGEND l-;---;-:-:-;-:-;-;I -Indicates Zone 10 Area NOTE: -ADT's are shown midblock Total = 14,910 ADT NO SCALE Local Facilities Management Plan Zone l O Exhibit 56 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 4. ANALYSIS OF BUILDOUT (2020) CONDITIONS a. Buildout Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2020 is shown in Exhibit 57. Trip generation for Zone 10 is shown in Exhibit 58. Zone 10 is calculated to generate about 14,910 ADT (7,455 in and 7,455 out), with 575 inbound and 835 outbound trips during the AM peak hour and 945 inbound and 605 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. There is a slight difference between the calculated trip generation from Exhibit 58 and a cordon summary for the trip generation assignment from Exhibit 62. This is due to an internal capture rate of about 5%. Internal capture refers to trips that stay within the Zone. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at an unacceptable LOS as shown in Exhibit 59 (assuming the 2010 improvements are in place); however, one intersection was identified for mitigation in Exhibit 64. This mitigation recommendation is based on a HCM calculation. The 2020 peak hour volumes are shown in Exhibit 60. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS' s as shown in Exhibit 61. The ADT volumes for 2020 are shown in Exhibit 62. XI-28 4 AVIARA PKWY LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 6 (0 r:-·--- ~ .... :•.·.·.·.·.·.·.· ... ........... 2 ::::::::::: ----6 ·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·. ··.·.·.:::.:f-.0:~ 4 £-.·.-r ... · ... ······· .::::.·.•.I ......... , ::::::::1 ........ i ........ , · ........ ! ......... 1 ........... .-... 1 ·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·I ·······1 (ij. -::::::::::::::::::-... ·.-.-. r.·.··· .·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·.·. r:.-5?· .-.-.-.-::::.-. 1.:::_~ .•• :.:::::::::•.· • .- LEGEND f"" "'"I ........... ,J. X REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) , 23:~:o Circulation Element Local Facilities Management Plan Zone l 6 -Indicates Zone 10 Area -Indicates Number of Lanes NO SCALE Exhibit 57 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 58 Zone 10 Traffic Generation Year 2020 LAND USE SIZE DAILY TRIP ENDS AM PM (ADT) PEAK HOUR PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN OUT ADT SPLIT IN OUT Single Family Residential 898 DU 10/DU 8,980 8% 3:7 215 505 10% 7:3 630 270 Multi-Family Residential 180 DU 8/DU 1,440 8% 2:8 25 90 10% 7:3 100 45 Light Industrial 10.7 AC 80/AC 860 11% 9:1 85 10 12% 2:8 20 60 Elementary School 7.2AC 60/AC 430 28% 6:4 70 50 7% 3:7 10 20 Active Park 25.8AC 50/AC 1,290 4% 5:5 25 25 4% 5:5 25 25 Community Facilities 5.7 AC 30/AC 170 5% 6:4 5 115 8% 5:5 5 5 Day Care 21,780 SF 80/KSF 1,740 17% 5:5 150 150 18% 5:5 155 155 TOTAL TRIPS --14,910 --575 835 --945 605 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU) and acres. 3. All ADT's are rounded to the nearest 1 O and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. June,2000 XI-30 INTERSECTION 7) El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane 8) El Camino Real/Alga Road/ A viara Parkway 39) Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Road 40) Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street 41) Alga Road/ Alicante Road DELAY 1s measured m seconds. LOS = Level of Service DNE = Does Not Exist June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 59 Signalized Intersection Operations Zone 10 EXISTING YEAR2005 AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU ONE -ONE -0.54 A 0.69 0.42 A 0.56 A 0.71 C 0.75 ONE -ONE . 0.45 A 0.58 ONE . ONE . 0.52 A 0.77 0.46 A 0.48 A 0.45 A 0.49 0.00 > 0.61 to 0.71 to 0.81 to 0.91 to LOS B C A C A 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 > 1.00 YEAR2010 AM ICU 0.36 0.56 0.47 0.39 0.46 LOS A A A A A LOS A B C D E F PM ICU LOS 0.62 B 0.68 B 0.46 A 0.70 B 0.49 A YEAR2020 AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS 0.6 A 0.55 A 0.65 B 0.88 0 0.58 A 0.49 A 0.50 A 0.67 B 0.63 B 0.51 A XI-31 EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE ..,..,. r-,no _,__ ,.::::., ~!~ '-._ 278/ 50 1 j l -180/197 ,., , -. r 367/sos JOO/ 22 J J18/272 -78/ SJ, 0 ALGA ROAD,/ ALICANTE ROAD IOON "''°-,.::::., ..,._,.. co-- .)''-... 254/ 78 J JJ0/546- 61/4581 '-._ 9/ 16 -440/686 , 5/ 8 .,,.,, ... LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS EL CAMINO REAL/ ALGA ROAD m,-111 mo,o -N-N ,,, ..,_,._ .,,~.,, '-199/ 54 JI l -261/JJ9 .. t-. r 608/446 163/ 61J 209/470- 374/5341 r-0<0 °'"'"' .,.a,,._ ® ''' a,,n-_..,,._ ..,.,,.., POINSETTIA LANE/ ALICANTE ROAD ... ..,., ..,_.., NN ''' ON.-, '-._ 22/ 27 ,.__a, ,) + '-... -520/8J6 r 111 s1 516/268...) .. 'If, 554/496 - 7/ J2', .. ..,o _..,,. ''' °'"'"' @) ,o-o _.., REV. 10/17/00 "QSA" = Outside Study Area, less than 50 POINSETTIA LAN'tf EL FUERTE STR ET ,._.,.._ "'a,111 -,n ,,, OCQIO N-N ,) + '-... 218/ 60J 648/Joo- 118/1661 @ E-W STREET '-._ 56/ 19 -293/700 r 11;11J ,t, OIOO a, ,o N ...... , ...... 111..-N 000 NIO- '-._ AM/PM -AM/PM ,AM/PM B a:: t;; "' I z NO SCALE ILG723U9.DWG peak hour project traffic volumes 1r, 2020 Traffic Vojlue;;~ir~;,~; ~~;eke~~~rs Local Facilities Management Plan Zone l 0 Exhibit 60 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 61 2020 Peak Hour Segment Operations Zone 10 SEGMENT LANES LINK DIRECTION V/C LOS LANES LINK DIRECTION V/C LOS LOCATION EACH VOLUME EACH VOLUME DIRECTION DIRECTION Alicante Road n/o Poinsettia Lane 2 328 NB 0.09 A 2 485 SB 0.13 A s/o Poinsettia Lane 1 65 NB 0.04 A 1 326 SB 0.18 A n/o Alga Road 1 113 NB 0.06 A 1 198 SB 0.11 A Poinsettia Lane e/o El Camino Real 2 855 EB 0.24 A 2 1052 WB 0.29 A w/o Alicante Road 2 796 EB 0.22 A 2 1085 WB 0.30 A Alga Parkway e/o El Camino Real 2 1374 EB 0.38 A 2 839 WB 0.23 A w/o Alicante Road 2 1082 EB 0.30 A 2 841 WB 0.23 A Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak direction, by direction, i.e. northbound, etc. VIC Ranges LOS -0.60 _A 0.61 -0.70 ~ 0.71 -0.80 _Q 0.81 -0.90 _Q 0.91 -1.00 _!; > 1.00 _£ June,2000 XI-33 AVIARA PKWY LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 0 0 C\J BOO ~ 0 0 0 0 -·---· 0 r-_-:::::::::: 0 0 rr) N :-:-:-:-:-:-: -:::::-:::-:-:::-:::::-;) ...... ············ ..::J~ .... :-:-:-:-:, ::::::::., ·:•:. -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-] ·::. ·::::::::, ..... . ...... . :::::. ::::::::.1 -:-:-:-:-:--:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-] ·:::::. ·::::::::, ....... . ...... . ::::::::. ·:::::::., -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-] ·::::::::: ·::::::, .......... ····· 2soo· ::: ··:.:: ALGA RD LEGEND t-.-,·.·.·:,·.·.·J -Indicates Zone 10 Area NOTE: -ADT's are shown midblock Total = 14,910 ADT REV. 04/12/01 SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) ,~:o Zone 1 O ADT's NO SCALE Local Facilities Management Plan Zone l 0 Exhibit 62 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 D. MITIGATION June,2000 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS Prior to the recordation of the first final map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone 10, a financing program guaranteeing construction of the following circulation improvements shall be approved by the City. With the following improvements, all analyzed intersections and street segments were calculated to operate at acceptable Levels of Service. The following mitigation measures are pursuant to the adopted performance standards under the Growth Management Ordinance for Zone 10. Additional mitigation measures specific to the portion of Zone 10 within the Villages of La Costa Master Plan are contained within the project's Environmental Impact Report (EIR 98-07). a Improvements needed now No mitigation required. b. Improvements needed by 2005 c. Poinsettia Lane -Construct Poinsettia Lane as a four-lane major arterial from El Camino Real to the existing terminus east of El Fuerte Street. Included within the construction of Poinsettia Lane will be the intersection improvements at El Camino Real, Alicante Road, and El Fuerte Street. Details of which are outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis attached as Appendix A-4. Alicante Road -Construct Alicante Road as a 2-lane collector between the northerly boundary of Zone 10 and Alga Road. Included within the construction of Alicante Road will be the intersection improvements at Poinsettia Lane and at Alga Road. Details of which are outlined in the Traffic Impact Analysis attached as Appendix A-4. Improvements needed by 2010 Estrella De Mar Road -Construct Estrella De Mar Road as a two-lane local street between Poinsettia Lane and Alga Road. Included within the construction of Estrella De Mar will be the median closure at the intersection of Alga Road. El Fuerte Street -Construct as a two-lane secondary arterial between Palomar Airport Road and Alga Road. XI-35 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 d. Improvements needed by build out (2020) e. El Camino Real/Alga Road/Aviara Parkway intersection - Provide eastbound to southbound overlap signal phasing. Summary Mitigation to the significantly impacted intersections and street segments are listed on Exhibit 63 and shown graphically in Exhibit 64. With the previously mentioned improvements, all intersections and road segments are calculated to operate at acceptable Levels of Service to meet the adopted performance standard through buildout. XI-36 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 63 Mitigation Summary for Calculated Impacts Zone 10 IMPACTED EXISTING 2005 2010 SEGMENT OR INTERSECTION WITH REFERENCE NUMBER INTERSECTIONS 7) El Camino Real/ Construct east and Poinsettia Lane west legs of intersection 8) El Camino Real/ Alga Road/ Aviara Parkway 39)Poinsettia Lane/ Construct new Alicante Road intersection 40) Poinsettia Lane/ Construct new El Fuerte Street intersection 41) Alga Road/ Construct north leg Alicante Road of intersection SEGMENTS Poinsettia Lane Construct four-lane roadway from El Camino Real to El Fuerte St Alicante Road Construct two-lane roadway between the proposed school site and Alaa Road Estrella De Mar Construct two- lane roadway between Poinsettia Ln and Alga Rd w/ median closure El Fuerte Street Construct two- lane roadway between Palomar Airport Rd and Alga Rd Note: For detailed improvement descriptions, please refer to Appendix A-4. Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 11/9/00 June,2000 2020 Provide eastbound overlap signal phasing XI-37 EXISTING EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE DOES NOT EXIST EL CAMINO REAL/ ALGA ROAD 4H~~ ~ s ® '' ttt r"' I::: POINSETTIA LANE/ ALICANTE ROAD DOES NOT EXIST POINSETTIA LANEL EL FUERTE STREET DOES NOT EXIST @ ALGA ROAD/ ALICANTE ROAD --r ~Iv @ YEAR 2005 EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE EL CAMINO REAL/ ALGA ROAD 4H"--~ ~ s ® '' m, I::: POINSETTIA LANE/ ALICANTE ROAD @ MITIGATION POINSETTiA LANE/ EL FUERTE STRtET -4l'.. ~ s' :::! ~ttr ,. @ MITIGATION ALGA ROAD/ ALICANTE ROAD ~ ,4\.. -r s !.. ,t--' @ MITIGATION YEAR 2010 EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE EL CAMINO REAL/ ALGA ROAD 4H~~ ~ s ,,tttr"' ® ... ... POINSETTIA LANE/ ALICANTE ROAD POINSETTIA LANE/ EL FUERTE STRtET ~ 4~~ -Sr !.. ,tt' ' @ ALGA ROAD/ ALICANTE ROAD ~ 4"---r s !.. ,r ' © YEAR 2020 EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE 0 EL CAMINO REAL/ ALGA ROAD POINSETTIA LANE/ ALICANTE ROAD POINSETTIA LANE/ EL FUERTE STREET @ ALGA ROAD/ ALICANTE ROAD REV. 1 0/ 16/00 "OSA" = Outside Study Area, less than 50 IG723U8.DWG peak hour project traffic volumes r, Lane Geomet; ~~~;;;ii~na;ded to intersection. Local Facilities Management Plan Zone l O LEGEND @ -Traffic Signal @ -Unsignolized FF -Free Flaw RTOL -Right-turn Overlap NOTE: (N)-North (S)-South (E)-East (W)-West Mitigation is shown in bold. Existing geometry is shown shaded. E-W STREET >-w w "' ... en NO SCALE LINSCOTT LAW& GREENSPAN Exhibit 64 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 XII. FIRE FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD No more than 1,500 dwelling units outside of a five-minute response time. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY 1. INVENTORY Zone 10 is entirely within the five-minute response time of Fire Station 2, located at 1906 Arenal, and partially within the five-minute response time of Fire Station 5, located at the Safety Center. These Stations are shown on Exhibit 65. A 30 mph average driving rate is used to determine the five-minute response time. The five-minute response time begins when the fire truck leaves the fire station. This is equivalent to an approximate 2.5 mile driving distance from the fire station. 2. PHASING Because all future development in Zone 10 is within the five-minute response time of Fire Stations Nos. 2 and 5, Zone 10 will conform to the fire performance standards to build out. Therefore, it was unnecessary to do a phasing analysis for fire services in Zone 10. 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Zone 10 presently meets the fire performance standard and will continue to meet the performance standard through build out of the City. C. MITIGATION I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 10 No special conditions are necessary at this time. D. FINANCING June, 2000 All fire facilities are in place for Zone 10 and the required performance standard has been met, therefore, no special funding mechanisms are required. City of Oceanside ··--L_ \J\\i09e r~= LEGEND □ Existing Fire Station 0 Proposed Fire Station ••••Station 2 Response Time • 141' -'station 4 Response Time /•-station 5 Response Time ,♦ .-• Station 6 Response Time o I ,. I I City of Encinitas k Fire Response Time Zone 1 O Local Facilities Management Plan Fire Station • ••• ••••• ■ ■ ·\....r,. .. Exhibit 65 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 XIII. OPEN SP ACE FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Fifteen percent of the total land area in the zone exclusive of environmentally constrained non-developable land must be set aside for permanent open space and must be available concurrent with development. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY June, 2000 Performance standard open space consists of 1) developed open space areas within existing and approved projects and 2) unconstrained undeveloped open space throughout the remainder of the zone. Unconstrained undeveloped open space is land that will remain as permanent open space and is free of environmental constraints. Environmental constraints include: beaches, permanent bodies of water, floodway, slopes greater than 40%, significant wetlands, significant riparian habitats, significant woodland habitats, major power line easements, railroad track beds, and other significant environmental features as determined by the environmental review process. Slopes 25-40% and major powerline easements that are improved for open space purposes can count for open space facilities. 1. INVENTORY During the preparation of the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan, it was determined that Zone 10 and certain other zones within the City meet or exceed the requirements for Open Space and, therefore, an analysis is not needed in the LFMP. 2. PHASING The existing open space exceeds the performance standard demand at build out. Therefore, no phasing of open space is required. 3. ADEQUACY FINDINGS Pursuant to the 1986 CFIP, Zone IO has sufficient Performance Standard open space for all development within Zone IO through build out. XIII-1 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Habitat Conservation Plan In 1995, the City and the Fieldstone Company, along with various State and Federal government agencies entered into an agreement in order to preserve specific portions of Zone 10 impacted by environmentally sensitive species and habitat. This was subsequently issued to Real Estate Collateral Management (RECM). This agreement (Implementation Agreement) and its accompanying Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) significantly limited the developable area within the RECM properties and required all areas specified as conservation areas to be redesignated as General Plan Open Space. However, the agreement also provided for the shift of dwelling units previously available within the conservation areas to the developable areas. C. MITIGATION I. SPECIAL CONDITIONS No special conditions. D. FINANCING June,2000 The required performance standard for open space has been met; therefore, no special funding mechanisms are required. XIII-2 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 XIV. SCHOOL FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD School capacity to meet projected enrollment within the zone as determined by the appropriate school district must be provided prior to projected occupancy. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQlJACY ANALYSIS June, 2000 As shown on Exhibit 66, two school districts will serve students in Zone 10: San Marcos Unified School District (SMUSD) and Carlsbad Unified School District (CUSD). Since Zone 10 is served by two different school districts, analysis of school facility adequacy shall be addressed on an individual district basis. 1. CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT a. b. c. Inventory A majority of Zone 10 is within the Carlsbad Unified School District. There are currently seven elementary schools, two middle schools, one continuation high school and one high school within the Carlsbad Unified School District. The majority of the existing schools in CUSD are located within the Northwest Quadrant. According to CUSD all of the existing schools are operating at capacity. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: SFD Multi Total Units Units Total Rate Po:Qulation Existing 0 0 0 2.3178 0 Build Out 510 180 690. 2.3178 1,600 Phasing The CUSD has adopted a school location plan and is also in the process of developing a finance plan based on the Mello-Roos financing mechanism. The new school location plan projected XIV-1 City of Oceanside LEGEND Existing Proposed • 0 Elementary ■ i Middle School ♦ Junior High A High School k School Locations Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan City of • Encinitas 'a...l,..■ • • Exhibit 66 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 build out demand based on LFMP development expectations. It was determined that approximately 341 existing and future students in CUSD east of El Camino Real would benefit from a school site in Zone 10. Build out numbers for Zones 6, 10 and 17 equate to approximately 1/2 the demand for an elementary school site. A potential school site has been identified in Neighborhood 1.4 of the Villages of La Costa Master Plan, and an alternative site has been identified in Neighborhood 1. 7 of it. Exhibit 67 incorporates the buildout projections for Zone 10 within the Carlsbad Unified School District. d. Adequacy Findings e. For the purposes of long range planning, CUSD considers all existing facilities at capacity. The smallest increment of demand area used by the District for facility analysis is the quadrant. One additional school site has been identified in the southeast quadrant to be located within Zone 10. K-5 students generated from Zone 10 will initially attend A viara Oaks Elementary School. If a school site is warranted in Zone 10, than all K-5 students will attend the new school. Students in the grades 6-8 generated from Zone 10 will attend A viara Oaks Middle School. Grades 9-12 students will attend Carlsbad High School. Mitigation 1. Conformance with the adopted school performance standard will be a prerequisite of any development within the zone. All development within Zone 10 will be conditioned to pay school fees in accordance with the requirements of the State of California and the Carlsbad Unified School District. ii. Prior to the issuance of building permits for any development within Zone 10, the developers and the Carlsbad Unified School District will enter into an agreement which will exchange parcel tax and developer fee credit for the land valuation, site preparation costs, and certain offsite improvements for the potential elementary school site in Neighborhood 1.4 or the alternative site in Neighborhood 1.7, if a school site is determined to be needed. If a school site is determined unnecessary by the Carlsbad Unified School District, then the area reserved for the school site shall have a land use designated consistent with the surrounding General Plan Land Use Designation and mitigation will then be payment of school fees. XIV-3 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 f. Financing The Carlsbad Unified School District has adopted an alternative method to provide funding for school facilities in the form of a "Facility Financing Plan". The plan is a Mello-Roos based program. If the District elects to initiate the strategy outlined in the Facility Financing Plan, existing school collection fees will be discontinued and replaced with a new financing system. XIV-4 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone I 0 EXHIBIT 67 School Facility Demand Table -Carlsbad Unified School District Gen11r11I Plan Resldendal Dwelling Units Student Generadon Rates Student Generation Tolals Land Use Sub-Existing Approved Future area Bulldout Existing Approved Future PfOjec:tlons K-6 M 1-12 K-6 M 1-12 K-6 6-8 1-12 K-6 M 1-12 SF MF SF MF SF MF SF IIF SF IIF SF IIF SF IIF SF IIF SF IIF SF IIF RLM-3 0 0 0 0 223 0 223 0 0.244 0.214 0.120 0.093 0.148 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 54.4 0.0 26.8 0.0 33.0 0.0 RlM-4 0 0 0 0 107 0 107 0 0.244 0.214 0.120 0.093 0.148 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 2a 1 0.0 12.8 0.0 15.8 0.0 RLM-9 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0.244 0.214 0.120 0.093 0.148 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 RLM-10 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0.244 0.214 0.120 0.093 0.148 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.2 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.3 0.0 RLM-1f 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0.244 0.214 0.120 0.093 0.148 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.7 0.0 1.8 0.0 2.2 0.0 RLM-12 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0.244 0.214 0.120 0.093 0.148 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 RM-1C 0 0 0 0 44 0 44 0 0.244 0.214 0.120 0.093 0.148 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.7 0.0 5.3 0.0 8.5 0.0 RMH-5 0 0 0 0 96 180 96 180 0.244 0.214 0.120 0.093 0.148 0.153 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.4 38.5 11.5 16.7 14.2 27.5 Totals 0 0 0 0 510 180 510 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 124.4 38.5 61.Z 11.7 75.5 27.5 June,2000 XIV-5 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 2. SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT a. Inventory A portion of Zone 10 is located within the San Marcos Unified School District. Currently there are two existing elementary schools from SMUSD within the City of Carlsbad. The San Marcos Unified School District has proposed an additional elementary school site to be located within the City of Carlsbad. Additionally, Woodlands Junior High School and San Marcos High School will serve a portion of Zone I 0. b. Build Out Assumptions Existing and Build Out Population: Existing Build Out c. Phasing SFD Units 0 388 Multi Units 0 0 Total 0 388 Rate 2.3178 2.3178 Total Population 0 899 The San Marcos Unified School District has developed a long range master plan. Within the master plan, student growth is by grade level to the year 2000 with the need and timing of future schools based on these forecasts. The master plan indicates that there may be a need for an additional elementary school site within the City of Carlsbad. However, the site is not projected to be located within Zone 10. Since Zone 10 is located within two school districts, the build out projection for the area within the SMUSD is incorporated in Exhibit 68. XIV-6 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 68 School Facility Demand Table -San Marcos School District Residential Dwelling Units Student Generation Existing Approved Future Bulld Out Projections General Plan Rates Land Use Sub Build Out area Existing Approved Future Projections K-5 6-8 9-12 K-5 6-8 10-12 K-5 6-8 10-12 K-5 6-8 10-12 K-5 6-8 10-12 RLM-6 0 0 259 259 0.306 0.116 0.140 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 79.3 30.0 36.3 79.3 30.0 36.3 RLM-7 0 0 38 38 0.306 0.116 0.140 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.6 4.4 5.3 11.6 4.4 5.3 RLM-8 0 0 91 91 0.306 0.116 0.140 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.8 10.6 12.7 27.8 10.6 12.7 TOTALS 0 0 388 388 0.0 o.o 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 118.7 45.0 54.3 118.7 45.0 54.3 June, 2000 XIV-7 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 d. Adequacy Findings San Marcos Unified School District considers all existing facilities to be operating at capacity. Temporary classrooms and relocatables are being used by the district to provide capacity. Based on the requirements of the SMUSD long-range master plan, the school district believes it will be able to provide capacity to build out. e. Mitigation f. Conformance with the adopted school performance standards will be a prerequisite if any development is to occur within the zone. All development within Zone 10 will be conditioned to pay school fees in accordance with the requirement of the San Marcos Unified School District. Prior to the approval of a final map for any project within the San Marcos Unified School District, the Developer shall comply with all applicable statutory requirements such as payment of school impact fees or participation in a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District. Financing No financing is required for school facilities other than school fees. XIV-8 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 XV. SEWERFACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE STANDARD Trunk-line capacity to meet demand, as determined by the appropriate sewer districts, must be provided concurrent with development. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS June,2000 Sewer service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three independent agencies: Carlsbad Sewer Service District, Leucadia County Water District and the Vallecitos Water District. Zone 10 is located within two sewer districts: The Carlsbad Sewer Service District (CSSD) service area and the Leucadia County Water District (LCWD) service area as shown on Exhibit 69. The topography and landforms do not match the service area boundaries. To avoid a pump station and unneeded extensions of pipelines into open space areas, and to be sensitive to existing landforms, units have been connected to the logical sewer lines. Prior to approval of any neighborhood final maps within the boundary adjustment area, as shown on Exhibit 72, the Developer will receive LAFCO approval of adjustments to the sewer service boundaries or as an alternative, service agreements approved by the applicable board or council must be entered into to serve the zone in accordance with this plan. The information contained in this plan was obtained from the "Benefit Area Fees For Conveyance System Improvements Update To The December, 1987 City Of Carlsbad Master Plan Of Sewerage" prepared by Wilson Engineering, December 1990, "City of Carlsbad Master Plan of Sewerage" prepared by Wilson Engineering, January 1992, "1994 Planning Study Update" prepared for LCWD by Parsons Engineering Science, April 1995, and the "Sewer Master Plan Update Volume V, October 1997" by Carollo Engineers. The land within Zone 10 is presently undeveloped, but a sewer pump station has been constructed and sized in Zone 10 to serve portions of Zones 10 and 17. The Vallecitos Water District has an existing sewer transmission line and reclaimed line crossing the northern portion of Zone 10. These facilities are shown on Exhibit 69. Since sewer service to this zone is provided by two sewer districts, each will be described separately and has been evaluated per the proposed boundary adjustment. In addition, the Developer and the service provider will enter into a service agreement or adjust the boundaries to resolve gravity issues in order to ensure that individual neighborhood areas are serviced by the same provider. XV-I June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 1. CARLSBAD SEWER SERVICE DISTRICT a. Inventory The Carlsbad Sewer Service District provides sewer service to the northerly portion of Zone 10. The northerly portion of Zone 10 is located in the Buena/San Marcos Interceptor sewer drainage basin and will sewer into the Vallecitos Interceptor. The V allecitos Interceptor is owned by the V allecitos Water District, but the City of Carlsbad has capacity rights to 5 mgd throughout the length of the interceptor. The interceptor begins at the end of the V allecitos siphon near the intersection of Camino Vida Roble and El Camino Real. It then flows westerly through the industrial park. The interceptor then follows Palomar Airport Road westerly to the Encinas Water Pollution Control Facility. The Poinsettia Sewage Lift Station is located in Zone 10 and shown on Exhibit 69. This station has a capacity of2.45 MOD and can serve the ultimate build out of Zone 10 and all future planned development in the Poinsettia Sewer Lift Station Service Area. At build out ofits service area, the station will use 2.45 MOD of the 5 MOD rights Carlsbad has to the Vallecitos interceptor. XV-2 City of Oceanside ··--t_ \/\\\O(-le r~= o I .,. I I : City of -· Vista ■ ~o a f ~tny of LEGEND City of Encinitas )(·· . . P.S. eucadia ater Di . . ... ■ ■ □ Existing Lift Station .... City of ■ Encinitas \...ri..■ / Water District Boundary ,,.-I Existing Force Line r Existing Sewer Line k Existing Major Sewer District Facilities Zone 1 O Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 69 --, I I I I i___ J STING~ · I ~GE t,IFT~ATIO '--J ( ' I s~~~~ I ~~ G I I EXISTING 12" _J FORCE MAIN -.--el.~ y9DRINA SEWAGE LIFT St :TION (to be abandoned others} LEGEND ; Existing Service Boundary =;;;~ -~--1 Existing Sewer Une • j Pump Station @ Sewer Line Size I \___ i -----I ~CARLSBAD SEWER !._; VICE DISTlqCT k Existing Sewer Facilities Zone 10 Local Facilities Management Plan I ~-.___/\.....__• I I .. .,,--• Exhibit 70 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 b. Technical Assumptions C. d. Carlsbad's current sewer Master Plan establishes unit flow generation factors as a basis for projecting the average sewer flows. The average unit flow from the City of Carlsbad was projected using 220 gallons per day per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). The La Golindrina pump station, located east of Zone 10, is a temporary pump station and will be abandoned at the time sewer facilities are constructed within Zone 10. Existing Demand The land within Zone 10 is presently undeveloped and contains no existing sewer demand. Build Out Projections and Sewer Demand The projected build out sewer flows for each sewer district in Zone 10 can be determined by multiplying the build out projections as established in this plan by the average unit flow factors obtained from Carlsbad's Sewer Master Plan and the Leucadia County Water District's Planning Study. Projected build out x Average unit flow = Average projected build out sewer At buildout, the projected average sewer flow for Zone 10, by sewer district, is as follows: Carlsbad Sewer Service Area Land Proposed Average Build Out Use Build out Unit Flow Sewer Flow Residential 307 EDU 220GPD/EDU 67,540 GPD School lOEDU 220 GPD/EDU 2,200 GPD Community lOEDU 220GPD/EDU 2,200 GPD Facilities PI lOEDU 220 GPO/EDU 2,200 GPD SUBTOTAL-74,140 GPD XV-5 Land Use Residential TOTAL Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Leucadia County Water District Proposed Build out 771 EDU Average Build Out Unit Flow Sewer Flow 215 GPD/EDU 165,765 GPD 239,905 GPD The projected yearly average flow for each sewer district of Zone 10 is shown on Exhibit 71. EXHIBIT 71 Zone 10 Yearly Sewer Demand Carlsbad Sewer Service Leucadia County Water District District Projected Projected Yearly Cummulative Yearly Cummulative Number of Avg. Flow Number of Avg. Flow Year EDU (MGD) EDU (MGD) 2000 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 2001 150 0.0330 0 0.0000 2002 150 0.0660 0 0.0000 2003 7 0.0675 143 0.0307 2004 0 0.0675 150 0.0630 2005 0 0.0675 150 0.0952 2006 0 0.0675 150 0.1275 2007 0 0.0675 150 0.1597 2008 0 0.0675 28 0.1658 2009 0 0.0675 0 0.1658 2010 0 0.1815 0 0.1658 2011 0 0.1815 0 0.1658 Build Out Stub Total 307 0.1815 771 0.1658 Elementary School 10 0.0022 0 0.0000 Community Facilities 10 0.0022 0 0.0000 P/1 10 0.0107 0 0.0000 Build Out Total 337 0.1966 771 0.1658 Note: Average Unit Flow for the CSSD is 220 GPD per EDU as determined in Carlsbad's Sewer Master Plan Average Unit Flow for the LCWD is 215 GPD as determined in the Leucadia County Water District's Planning Study June, 2000 XV-6 ---, i \ VAUECl;OS PIPELINE"'·,..__ 24" and 12" ) I EXISTING 12" _J FORCE MAIN LEGEND l I Proposed Service Boundary I I Existing Sewer Line F--3 Proposed Sewer Une • I Pump Station @ Sewer Line Size lrt.. Proposed Major Sewer Facilities Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan I I I I I L_ Exhibit 72 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 e. Possible Use of Reclaimed Water f. The Carlsbad Municipal Water District's Master Plan of Sewerage specifies the future use of reclaimed water for the irrigation of open space and recreational park areas within Zone 10. The District has prepared a Reclaimed. Water Master Plan. All future development will be required to conform to the recommendations as outlined in the Reclaimed Water Master plan. A more detailed description of reclaimed water is provided in the Water section. Phasing The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facilities Management Plan is based on ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or commensurate with development. There are two separate sewer districts in Zone 10, as shown on Exhibit 64. Thresholds for the major sewer facilities within each district can be easily established, thereby determining the appropriate mitigation measures. The district boundaries allow for independent review and development for the sewer facilities within each district. g. Adequacy Findings Zone 10 currently meets the adopted performance standard for the sewer collection system. Major sewer facilities will be constructed as development occurs to ensure that conformance to the adopted performance standard will be maintained through the build out of Zone 10. h. Mitigation i. All development within Zone 10 will be required to pay the appropriate Sewer Connection Fees and Sewer Benefit Area Fees which includes a reimbursement for the Poinsettia Lift Station prior to issuance of any building permits. Financing No financing is required. XV-8 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 2. LEUCADIA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT a. Inventory The Leucadia County Water District provides sewer service to the southerly portion of Zone 10. Sewage generated within Leucadia County Water District's jurisdiction is transported by gravity sewers to the La Costa lift station. The La Costa Lift Station pumps the sewage to the major lift station (Leucadia Pumping Station) near the intersection of El Camino Real and La Costa Avenue. From this lift station the sewage is pumped through a network of lift stations (Leucadia Pump Station, Saxony Pump Station and the Batiquitos Pump Station) along La Costa A venue, Carlsba4 Blvd., and the railroad right-of-way to the Encinas Water Pollution Control Facility. b. Proposed Build Out Facilities At build out, the southerly portion of Zone 10 will sewer into the existing trunk line located south of the zone boundary. No improvements are required within the zone boundary except for local sewers. The Leucadia County Water District is currently in the process of upgrading the piping south of Zone IO and anticipates completion in 2003. To ensure that capacity is available at the time of construction, prior to the recordation of any neighborhood final map the applicant shall provide a letter from LCWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development. Capacity will be created by one of the flowing alternatives: 1. Flow monitoring indicates sufficient capacity in the existing lines 2. LCWD constructs improvements to constrained lines 3. Applicant constructs improvements to constrained lines subject to a reimbursement agreement 4. Applicant with LCWD and City of Carlsbad permission temporarily divert flow to alternative lines having capacity. c. Technical Assumptions Leucadia County Water District's current planning study establishes unit flow generation factors as a basis for projecting the average sewer flows. The average unit flow from LCWD was projected using 215 gallons per day per equivalent dwelling unit XV-9 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 (EDU). The Meadows No. 1 pump station (LCWD #3), located east of Zone 10, is a temporary pump station and will be abandoned at the time sewer facilities are constructed within Zone 10. d. Existing Demand e. f. Land within Zone 10 is presently undeveloped and contains no existing sewer collection system. There is no existing sewer demand in Zone 10. The portion of the La Costa Golf Course within Zone 10 sewers via an extended lateral to the existing facilities in Alga Road. Build Out Projections and Sewer Demand The projected build out sewer flows for each sewer district in Zone 10 can be determined by multiplying the build out projections, as established in this plan, by the average unit flow factors obtained from Carlsbad's Sewer Master Plan and the Leucadia County Water District's Planning Study. Projected build out x Average unit flow = Average projected build out sewer At buildout, the projected average sewer flow for Zone 10, by sewer district, is as follows: Land Use Residential Proposed Build out 771 EDU Average Build Out Unit Flow Sewer Flow 215 GPO/EDU 165,765 GPD The projected yearly average flow for each sewer district of Zone 10 is shown on Exhibit 71. Phasing The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facilities Management Plan is based on ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or concurrent with development. Proposed district boundaries are shown on Exhibit 72. The existence of separate districts allow for independent review and development for the sewer facilities within each district. XV-10 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 g. Adequacy Findings h. Zone 10 currently meets the adopted performance standard for the sewer collection system. Major sewer facilities will be constructed as development occurs to ensure that conformance to the adopted performance standard will be maintained through the build out of Zone 10. Mitigation 1. Prior to approval of any neighborhood final maps within the boundary adjustment area, as shown on Exhibit 72, the Developer will receive LAFCO approval of adjustments to the sewer service boundaries or as an alternative, service agreements approved by the applicable board or council must be entered into to serve the zone in accordance with this plan. 2. All development within the Leucadia County Water District will be required to pay the appropriate sewer connection fees prior to issuance of any building permits. 3. Prior to recordation of any neighborhood final map, applicant shall provide a letter from LCWD evidencing that capacity will be available for the proposed increment of development. i. Financing No financing of sewer facilities are needed within the Leucadia County Water District. XV-11 Local Facilities Management Plan •Zone 10 XVI. WATER FACILITIES A. PERFORMANCE ST AND ARD Line capacity to meet the demand as determined by the appropriate water district must be provided concurrent with development. A minimum 10-day average storage capacity must be provided prior to any development. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS June,2000 Water service in the City of Carlsbad is provided by three agencies: Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD), Vallecitos Water District (VWD), and the Olivenhain Municipal Water District (OMWD). Zone 10 is located entirely within the Carlsbad Municipal Water District (CMWD) service area as shown on Exhibit 73. CMWD has a Master Plan, entitled "Water Master Plan" CMWD Project No. 89- 105, adopted January 29, 1991 by the Board of Directors and its purpose is to evaluate the water system within their District and to formulate long-range plans that will provide for future improvements. The above-described master plan has been revised and approved by CMWD. CMWD has adopted the "City of Carlsbad's Water Reclamation Master Plan", which was prepared by Dudek & Associates, INC. and adopted on March 3, 1992. The information contained in this Local Facilities Management Plan was obtained from the CMWD's "Water Master Plan", the Water Reclamation Master Plan, and through discussions with CMWD Engineering staff. XVI-I LEGEND .... City of Oceanside •• ¥ i~= I I <,, ----· ~D ,.. ,., ,,. '>{, -.,, X'o, -~ "pal I City of Encinitas livenhain Water ~ ■ City of San ■ ■ / Water District Boundary City of ■ Encinitas '\.....r,_.■ k Water District Boundaries Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 73 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 1. INVENTORY a. Existing Facilities: The existing CMWD water facilities that serve development of Zone 10 are shown on Exhibits 74 and 75 and are as follows: 1. Potable Water System Facility 1. Existing 16-inch transmission lines m El Camino Real. 2. Existing 12-inch and 20-inch transmission lines in El Camino Real. 3. Existing 12-inch transmission line m Alga Road. 4. Existing 8-inch transmission line from Alga Road north approximately 2,100 feet. ii. Reclaimed Water System Facility 1. Existing 12-inch fail-safe reclaimed water line b. Proposed Build Out Facilities: The CMWD Master Plans propose the following major water facilities as shown on Exhibit 74 for the ultimate build out of Zone 10: XVl-3 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 i. Potable System Facility 1. A proposed 30-inch water line located in future Poinsettia Lane from El Camino Real to the east boundary of Zone 10. 2. A proposed 16-inch water line located in El Camino Real from south boundary of Palomar Business Park Unit No. 1 south to existing IO- inch water line. 11. Reclaimed Water The tentative size and location of future reclaimed water lines serving Zone 10 and the region are shown on Exhibit 70. Facility 1. A proposed 16-inch reclaimed water line1 located in El Camino Real from Camino Vida Roble to Poinsettia Lane. 2. A proposed 16-inch, 12-inch and 8-inch reclaimed water line located in future Poinsettia Lane from El Camino Real to the east boundary of Zone 10. 3. A proposed 8-inch and 6-inch reclaimed water line2 located in Alga Road between the west and east boundary lines of Zone 10. 4. A proposed pumping station located on the east side of El Camino Real. 1This facility has been shown for reference purposes only. It is not required for development within Zone 10 and therefore shall not be required to be constructed as part of the development of Zone 10. 2lbid June,2000 XVI-4 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 5. A proposed 12-inch reclaimed water line in El Camino Real and paralleling the existing 18- inch line to the west in Zone 21. The location and size of the major water facilities proposed for Zone IO have been approximated only for the purposes of this plan. The actual location and sizes will be defined as Management Zone 10 develops and the major water facilities are analyzed per the Water District's current standards. c. Build Out Assumptions: The section in this plan, entitled "Build Out Projections", estimates the ultimate build out for Zone I 0. These build out projections are listed below: Land Use Residential RLM RM RMH TOTAL Non-Residential: Park Site/Elementary School Planned Industrial Golf Course (Existing) Community Facilities Projection Dwelling Units 758 44 276 1,078 34.4 Acres 7.6 Acres 80.8 Acres 6.9 Acres XVI-5 PROPOSED 16" (N.A.P.) LEGEND ...____.I Existing Water Line F--3 Proposed Water Line I • I Pressure Reduction Station @ Water Una Size \ .,__ ______ __, @@ k Potable Water Facilities Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan --, I 1 1 PRESSURE REGULATING 1 STATION TO BE LOCATED 1 WITHIN ZONE 17 l_,_ / Exhibit 74 LEGEND I i Existing Failsafe Line F--l P~oposed Reclaimed Water ~---~Line • l Existing Pump Station @ Water Line Size lt Reclaimed Water Facilities Zone l O Local Facilities Management Plan Exhibit 75 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 d. Technical Assumptions 1. Potable Water Average Unit Demand CMWD's Master Plan established unit demand factors as a basis for determining the projected average water demands. The following are the average demands by land use: Land Use Residential: RLM RM RMH Non-residential: Elementary School Park Site Golf Course Community Facilities Planned Industrial ii. Fire Flow Demands Average Unit Demand 625 GPD/DU 400GPD/DU 250GPD/DU 1,900 GPD/AC 1,440 GPD/ AC 1,440 GPD/ AC 3,000 GPD/ AC 2,000 GPD/ AC The fire flow requirements in CMWD's Master Plan for Residential land use is as follows: Land Use Residential: RLM RM RMH Non-residential: Elementary School Park Site Golf Course Community Facilities Planned Industrial Average Unit Demand 1,750 GPD/DU 2,500 GPD/DU 3,500 GPD/DU 3,000 GPD/AC 3,000 GPD/AC 3,000 GPD/AC 3,000 -4,000 GPD/ AC 3,000 -4,000 GPD/AC XVI-8 June, 2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 iii. Reclaimed Water Average Unit Demand CMWD's Water Reclamation Master Plan established unit demand factors as a basis for determining the projected average water demands. The average unit demand factor obtained from the Water Reclamation Master Plan is 2.50 AF/AC/YR for irrigation usage for residential land and park site use, 3.75 AF/AC/YR for irrigation usage for school land use and 3 .2 AF/ AC/YR for irrigation usage for the existing golf course. The number of irrigated acres in a residential area is estimated to be 20 percent of the gross acreage, 60 percent of the gross acreage for schools, and 80 percent of gross acres for park sites. For planning purposes, yearly demand projections are shown on Exhibit 76 for potable system and Exhibit 77 for reclaimed system for irrigation. XVI-9 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 76 Zone 10 Yearly Potable Water Demand Cumulative Projected Yearly Projected Yearly Demand Year Dwelling Units Demand (in GPO) (in GPO) Existing 8.1 11,664 11,664 2000 0 0 11,664 2001 150 51,250 62,914 2002 150 71,250 134,164 2003 150 124,625 258,789 2004 150 130,200 388,989 2005 150 187,500 576,489 2006 150 144,375 720,864 2007 150 0 720,864 2008 28 0 720,864 Build Out Subtotal 720,864 Elementary School 7.2AC 13,680 13,680 Park Site 27.2AC 39,168 39,168 Community Facilities 6.9AC 20,700 20,700 Industrial . 7.7AC 15,400 15,400 Golf Course SO.SAC 116,352 116,352 Build Out Total 926,164 June,2000 XVI-IO Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 77 Yearly Reclaimed Water Demand Projected Yearly Projected Yearly No. Build No. of Irrigated Average Unit Cumulative Year OutAcres Acres Demand Demand AF/YR Existing 80.8 72.7 3.2 232.7 2000 0.0 0.0 0.0 232.7 2001 0.0 0.0 0.0 232.7 2002 37.4 7.5 2.5 251.5 2003 48.1 9.6 2.5 275.5 2004 75.1 15.0 2.5 313.0 2005 94.6 18.9 2.5 360.2 2006 175.8 35.2 2.5 448.2 2007 154.0 30.8 2.5 525.2 2008 0.0 0.0 0.0 525.2 Build Out Subtotal 525.2 Elementary School 7.2 4.3 3.8 16.1 Community Facilities 6.9 1.2 2.5 3.0 Industrial 7.6 1.2 2.5 3.0 Park Site 27.2 21.8 2.5 54.5 Build Out Total 602.3 June,2000 XVI-11 e. Land Use Residential RLM RM RMH Elementary School Park Site Golf Course Industrial Community Facilities Land Use Residential Elementary School Park Site Golf Course Community Facilities Industrial Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Projected Build Out Demand: The projected build out average potable water demands can be projected for Management Zone 10 by multiplying the build out projections as established in this Plan to the average unit demand factors obtained from CMWD's Master Plan. The projected average potable water demand for the build out of Management Zone 10 is as follows: Projected Build Out Average Demand Avg. Potable Water Demand 758 du 625 GPO/du 474,375 GPO 44du 400 GPO/du 17,600 GPO 276 du 250 GPO/du 69,000GPD 7.2AC 1,900 GPO/ AC 13,680 GPO Gross 27.2 AC 1,440 GPO/AC 39,168 GPO 80.8 AC 1,440 GPO/AC 116,352 GPO 7.6AC 2,000 GPO/ AC 15,200 GPO 6.9AC 3,000 GPO/AC 20,700 GPO TOTAL 748,475 GPO The projected average reclaimed water demand for the build out of Management Zone 10 is as follows: Projected Build Irrigated Acres Average Demand Avg. Reclaimed Out Water Demand 365AC 73.2 2.5 AF/YR/AC 183 AF/YR 7.2AC 4.3 3.7 AC 15.9 AF/YR/AC Gross 27.2 AC 21.8 2.5 AF/YR/AC 54.5 AF/YR SO.SAC 72.7 3.2 AF/YR/AC 232.6 AF/YR 7.9AC 1.2 2.5 AF/YR/AC 3.0AF/YR 7.9AC 1.2 2.5 AF/YR/AC 3.0AF/YR TOTAL 492 AF/YR f. Possible Use of Reclaimed Water: June,2000 On March 21, 1989, the City of Carlsbad adopted an interim Reclaimed Water Use Policy for new land development. This policy specifies that all new development within the City of Carlsbad shall use reclaimed water if it can be reasonably XVI-12 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 determined by the District and the District Engineer that reclaimed water is available to serve the project. The interim policy further indicates that installation of dual irrigation systems and connections to reclaimed water sources may be required subject to the terms and conditions of the Water Reclamation Master Plan. Additionally, the City adopted a mandatory use ordinance stating that if reclaimed water is available, it will be used. The CMWD's Water Reclamation Master Plan indicates availability of reclaimed water to new development within the District. Areas identified by this plan for reclaimed water use will be subject to the Interim Reclaimed Water Use Policy and consequent requirements from the District Engineer as specified above. There are approximately 217 acres within Zone IO which may benefit from the use of reclaimed water. This acreage includes the park site, the school site, residential areas and the existing golf course. 2. PHASING The approach to phasing taken by this Local Facilities Management Plan is based on ensuring that needed facilities are in place prior to or concurrent with development. Thresholds for the major water facilities within Zone 10 can be easily established, thereby determining the appropriate mitigation measures. C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS June,2000 Zone IO currently conforms with the adopted performance standard. Since development is required to install domestic water, which includes fire flow needs, and reclaimed water as a condition to future development, conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained to the ultimate build out of Zone 10. 1. A VERA GE 10-DA Y STORAGE CAP A CITY Per the revised Carlsbad Municipal Water District Master Plan for Public Water System, the storage capacity within the system is currently 15.1 days. The projected current storage capacity is 241.5 million gallons with average daily demand estimated to be 16.0 million gallons. This provides XVI-13 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 for a projected storage of 15.1 days capacity, thus, the districts system design currently assures that minimum ten-day storage supply is available. Storage Capacity3 Avg. Daily Demand Days of Storage STORAGE CAP A CITY Current 241.5 MG 16.0MGD 15.1 DAYS Projected-Ultimate 254.5MGD 24.5MGD 10.4DAYS The projected ultimate storage capacity is estimated to be 254.5 million gallons with an average ultimate daily demand of 24.5 million gallons. This will provide for an ultimate projected storage of 10.4 days capacity which assures that the minimum ten-day storage supply will be available at build out. D. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR ZONE 10 All future development in Zone 10 shall pay a major facilities fee based on E.D.U.'s to the Carlsbad Municipal Water District and a capacity charge to the San Diego County Water Authority. In addition, all development in Zone 10 shall be required to provide any water reclamation facilities identified in the Water Reclamation Master Plan as determined by the District Engineer. Any water reclamation pipelines necessary to accommodate a future phase of development must be financially guaranteed or provided for prior to the recordation of a final map, issuance of a grading permit or building permit, whichever occurs first. These guarantees shall be based upon the requirements for the service area within which the proposed development is located to the extent that the demand is created by future development. The following water facilities will be required as a condition of the approval of future development within Zone 10 to the satisfaction of the CMWD. 11f there is no additional in-system storage available and Zone 10 is built out, the District will maintain 14.3 days of storage. June, 2000 XVI-14 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 1. The proposed 30-inch potable water line located in future Poinsettia Lane from El Camino Real to the east boundary of Zone 10. 2. The proposed 12-inch potable line located in the future Alicante Road from Alga Road to the north boundary of Zone 10. 3. The proposed reclaimed 16-inch, 12-inch and 8-inch main located in future Poinsettia Lane E. FINANCING June,2000 The cost of the proposed potable water facilities is estimated to be $1,290,000. These facilities are to be financed by the Carlsbad Municipal Water District. The cost of future reclaimed water facilities located within Zone 10 is estimated to be $755,000. The line located within Zone 10 along Poinsettia Lane is anticipated to be built concurrent with development in the zone. An itemized cost estimate of this facility is contained in Exhibit 78. This estimate should only be used as a guide to approximate cost for preliminary planning purposes. Further cost analysis should be made as planning and design progress in Zone 10. XVI-15 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 EXHIBIT 78 Water Facility Financing Matrix Funding Option• Fac:lllty Amount Estimated Cost (1) Timing First Second Third Notes Water Fac:llitlN Potable water Facillles 30" Weter Main 7250LF $2,800,000 2005-2010 WATER CONN Reclaimed Water Facilities Carillo Way: Concurrent w/ 16" watar Main 2700 LF $405,000 Development Oewloper 12' Water MAln 2000LF $230,000 . a• water Main 1300LF $120,000 . Rec:lalmed Water Sub Total $755,000 TOTAL WATER COSTS $3,555,000 Noles: (1) Unit Prtc:e per CMWD Master Plan June,2000 XVI-16 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 XVII. FACILITIES FINANCING This chapter describes the proposed financing method or methods for each of the facilities which are identified in Parts VI through XVI (Analysis of Public Facilities Requirements) as required to meet the City's Growth Management Program Performance Standards. The financing method consists of: • Source of funds for construction of the facility. • Method of guaranteeing the availability of funds. • Source of public funds from which reimbursement is made to the developer of the facility, if applicable. This part may be used in the following ways: • For special conditions as described in the mitigation sections of Parts VI through XVI, Section C of this chapter describes the financing method and the sub area or sub areas responsible for providing the financing guarantee required by the Growth Management Ordinance. • For any development located in Zone 10, Exhibit 81 of Section C below identifies facilities for which the developer must provide the financing guarantee. A. AREAS RESPONSIBLE FOR FACILITY FINANCING June,2000 In order to clarify the responsibility of individual development projects to provide specific facilities, Zone 10 has been divided into four sub areas, called Facility Areas, as shown in Exhibit 79. Assessor's parcels included in the Facility Areas are listed in Exhibit 80. Certain parcels are excluded from the Facility Areas because there is existing development or because the City of Carlsbad or the Carlsbad Municipal Water District owns them. Owners of individual parcels are shown in Exhibits 6 and 7 of Part II. Although the Facility Areas are defined primarily to identify groups of ownerships, they are also defined to correspond approximately to infrastructure service areas as described in Part V. XVII-I -· I I k Facili!J( Areas Zone 1 O Local Facilities Management Plan --, I \ ' I I I I L_ \ I j I I I I ' ' Exhibit 79 June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT 80 Assessor's Parcels of Facility Areas Land Owner 1. Paziura/Raiby' s 2. Persic 3. Bons 4. Manzanita Partners 5. La Costa Hotel and Spa 6. RECM APN 213-050-16 215-021-01 215-021-06 215-021-04 215-021-08 215-030-15 215-031-09 215-052-16 215-061-10 213-030-11 215-021-07 215-030-06 215-030-14 215-031-58 215-052-15 215-061-01 215-061-09 215-480-02 XVII-3 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 B. TYPES OF FINANCING METHODS June,2000 The following sources of funds and financing guarantees are used in this plan. The application of these funds and completion of specified actions identified as "financing guarantee" shall constitute the guarantee that facilities will be provided, as required by Section 21.90.080 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 1. DEVELOPER FUNDING Under this method the developer will fund and construct certain required facilities prior to or concurrent with development of their particular property. Facilities to be funded in this way are those which normally would be imposed as conditions of approval of a tentative map under the City's development review process. The financing guarantee required by the Growth Management Ordinance that funds will be available for construction of the required facility shall be provided through delivery to the City of an acceptable security instrument, such as a surety bond, or through execution of an improvement agreement prior to the recordation of the final map. The improvement agreement must be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The agreement must also be accompanied by a security instrument as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code, i.e., as a surety bond, cash deposit, or an instrument or letter of credit. 2. CITY OF CARLSBAD COMMUNITY FACILITES DISTRICT NO. 1 A Mello-Roos community facilities district has been formed by the City of Carlsbad and approved on May 7, 1991, by an affirmative vote of the landowners to fund construction of certain Citywide facilities, including a number of facilities which are required by this plan. The financing guarantee required by the Growth Management Ordinance for any of the facilities to be funded by Carlsbad CFD No. l will be satisfied by participation in the district. 3. DEVELOPMENT AND IMPACT FEES Capital Improvement Programs of the City of Carlsbad and special districts contain plans to construct certain facilities including a number of facilities which are required by this plan. Sources of funds for these XVII-4 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 facilities are development impact fees which are collected at issuance of building permit. For facilities which are proposed to be funded from development fees, payment of such fees will satisfy the private developer's financial obligation for these facilities, as long as the applicable Growth Management Program Performance Standards are satisfied. 4. REIMBURSEMENT FROM THE CITY OF CARLSBAD DEVELOPMENT FEE FUND If a developer constructs a facility which is included in a City of Carlsbad development impact fee program, they may be reimbursed from the applicable fee fund, subject to the following conditions: • That sufficient, unobligated funds are available; • That the reimbursement is consistent with the priority of project funding shown in the most recent adopted Capital Improvement Program; and • That the reimbursement shall not exceed the maximum amount budgeted on the most recent adopted Capital Improvement Program. Costs eligible for reimbursement shall be limited to those that are directly related to the construction of the facility, as determined by the City Engineer. Examples of eligible costs are costs of construction, engineering design, cost estimates, and any other costs, which are incidental to construction. C. FINANCING PLAN June, 2000 This section summarizes the required facilities, sources of funds, and areas responsible for financing. A summary table (Exhibit 81) is followed by subsections corresponding to facility categories described in Part I. For Circulation, sewer collection and water distribution facilities, the financing method is described for each required facility. These detailed financing methods contain the following data: Special Conditions Estimated Cost Source of Funds The identifying number of the special condition for mitigation referenced in Part I. Estimated costs as shown in Parts VI through XVI. One or more of alternative sources of funds described in Section B. XVII-5 June,2000 Financing Guarantee Responsible Area Reimbursement Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 Guarantees applicable to selected source of funds. Facility Area or Areas that are required to fund or guarantee the facility (see Exhibit 74) Reimbursement due to the initial developer of the facility and the source of funds, if applicable. :XVII-6 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 EXHIBIT St Zone 11 Facility Reguirements2 Source of Funds and Financing Guarantee Facility Source of Funds Facility Area Responsible for Financing Notes A B C D 1.0 City Administrative Facllltles 1.1 PubUc Works Center Sewer, CFO 1, Water Repl C/F C/F C/F C/F 1.2 New City Hall CFD1 C C C C 2.0 Library Facllltles 2.1 Cole Ubrary Expansion CFD1/PFF C/F C/F C/F C/F 2.2 Cole Library Remodel PFF F F F F 3.0 wastewatar Tntatment Facllltles 3.1 Enclna Building Improvements Sewer Connecllon F F F F 3.2 Endna Phase V Interim Sewer Connection F F F F 3.3 Endna Phase V Expansion Sewer Connection F F F F 4.0 Park Facllltles 4.1 Veteran's Memorial Park (Citywide) CDF1 C C C C 4.2 Parks Restoration PIL-SE 4.3 Alga Norte Park • Land Acquisition PIL-5E 4.4 Alga Norte Park PFF F F F F 4.5 Leo Carrillo Park PFF F F F F 5.0 Drainage Facllltles Developer D D D D 6.0 Clrculatlon Facllftles 6.1 Poinsettia Lane -ECR to Eastem Terminus Developer D D D D 6.2 Alicante Rd. -Northern Boundary to Alga Rd Developer D D D D 6.3 Estrella De Mar Road -Poinsettia Lane to Alga Road Developer D D D D 6.4 El Fuerte Street• Palomar Airport Rd to Alga Rd Developer D D D D 6.5 ECR/ Avlara Parkway/ Poinsettia Lane Intersection Developer D D D D 7.0 Fire Facllltles (None Reqtired) 8.0 Open Space Facllltles Developer D D D D 9.0 Schools Facllltles State Funding/School Fees F F F F 10.0 Sewer Facllltles 10.1 12" Sewer Main Developer D D D D 10.2 12" Sewer Main Developer D D D D 10.3 Pump Station & Force Main Developer D D D D 11.0 Water Facllltles 11.1 30" Potable Line in Poinsettia Lane Developer D D D D 11.2 12" Potatable Main In Poinsettia Lane Developer D D D D 11.3 12" Potatable Main In Alicante Road Developer D D D D 11.4 a• Main In Poinsettia Lane Developer D 0 D D 11.5 12" Main in Poinsettia Lane Developer D D D D 11.6 16" Main In Poinsettia Lane Developer D D D D Notes: For definition of Facility Areas, see Section A of text and Exhibit 79. See text also for a detailed discussion of financing method and guarantee. This table provides a summary of actions required to guarantee the financing of facilities. Not all prope C Participation In the City of Carlsbad CFO No.1 D Developer construction or dedication; or execution of an improvement agreement F Payment of applicable development impad or other fee s This facility Is completed, or financing guarantee is otherwise satisfied Facility Is not required for this area June,2000 XVII-7 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 CITY ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES -FINANCING Required Facilities The required facilities are the New City Hall and the Public Works Center. These facilities are required for all zones in the City including Zone 10. Source of Funds The City's Capital Improvement Program includes the above facilities. The source of funds is Public Facilities Fee collected at issuance of building permit. Portions of the Public Works Center and New City Hall are also proposed to be funded through the Carlsbad CFO No.I. Financing Guarantee Participation in Carlsbad CFO No. 1 satisfies the financing guarantee for the facilities included in the CFO. Payment of Public Facilities Fee shall satisfy the financing obligation of private development for the remainder of City Administrative Facilities, as long as the Growth Management Program Performance Standards are met. June,2000 XVII-8 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 LIBRARY FACILITIES -FINANCING Required Facilities The required facility is the expansion of the North Library (Cole). The same facility is required for all zones in the City, including Zone 10. Source of Funds The City's Capital Improvement Program includes the above facility. The source of funds is Public Facilities Fee collected at issuance of building permit. The expansion of the North Library is also proposed to be funded through Carlsbad CFO No. I. Financing Guarantee Participation in Carlsbad CFO No. 1 satisfies the financing guarantee for the facilities included in the CFO. Payment of Public Facilities Fee shall satisfy the financing obligation of private development for the remainder of Library Facilities, as long as the Growth Management Program Performance Standard for libraries is met. June, 2000 XVII-9 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES -FINANCING Required Facilities The required facilities are the Encina Building Improvements and the Encina Phase V Expansion with Interim capacities. Source of Funds The source of funds for these facilities is the sewer connection fee collected by Carlsbad Municipal Water District. Financing Guarantee Payment of sewer connection fee shall satisfy the financing obligation of private development for Wastewater Treatment Capacity. June, 2000 XVII-10 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 PARK FACILITIES-FINANCING Required Facilities Park facilities required for the Southeast Quadrant are Alga Norte Park, Veteran's Memorial Park, and Leo Carillo Park. Source of Funds Land has been or will be acquired for all park facilities required to serve future development in Zone 10. Park improvements will be funded from Public Facilities Fees or through the parks agreement executed by the City and developers. All park improvements are incorporated in the City's Capital Improvement Program. No additional sources of funds are required. Financing Guarantee Payment of Park-in-Lieu and Public Facilities Fees shall satisfy the financing guarantee for construction of the future parks, as long as the Growth Management Program Performance Standards for parks are met. June,2000 XVII-11 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 CIRCULATION FACILITIES-FINANCING Required circulation facilities are listed in the special conditions and in the financing matrix of the Circulation Section (Part XI). Sources of funds and financing guarantee are described below in the financing method for each facility. June,2000 XVII-12 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD CIRCULATION FACILITIES Facility 6.1 Poinsettia Lane -ECR to Eastern Terminus Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement Not Specified Facility The required facility includes the construction of Poinsettia Lane as a four-lane major arterial from El Camino Real to the existing terminus east of El Fuerte Street. Included within the construction of Poinsettia Lane will be the intersection improvements at El Camino Real, Alicante Road, and El Fuerte Street. Source of Funds If at the time of development of Finance Areas A-D, the City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard; the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction. Financing Guarantee If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be constructed with the development by imposing conditions of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s). The conditions of approval referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the recordation of the final map for Finance Areas A-D. The improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash deposit, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit acceptable to the Financial Management Director and the City Attorney. June, 2000 XVII-13 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 Reimbursement If the developer(s) of Finance Areas A-D are required to construct the above improvements they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. June, 2000 XVII-14 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone I 0 FINANCING METHOD cmCULATION FACILITIES Facility 6.2 Alicante Rd. -Northern Boundary to Alga Rd. Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement Not Specified Facility The required facility includes the construction of Alicante Road as a 2-lane collector between the northern boundary of Zone 10 and Alga Road. Included within the construction of Alicante Road will be the intersection improvements at Poinsettia Lane and at Alga Road Source of Funds If at the time of development of Finance Areas A-D, the City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard; the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction. Financing Guarantee If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be constructed with the development by imposing conditions of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s). The conditions of approval referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the recordation of the final map for Finance Areas A-D. The improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash deposit, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit acceptable to the Financial Management Director and the City Attorney. June,2000 XVII-15 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 Reimbunement If the developer(s) of Finance Areas A-D are required to construct the above improvements they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. June,2000 :XVII-16 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 FINANCING MEfflOD CIRCULATION FACILITIES Facility 6.3 Estrella De Mar Rd. -Poinsettia Lane to Alga Road Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement Not Specified Source of Funds If at the time of development of Finance Areas A-D, the City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard; the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction. Financing Guarantee If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be constructed with the development by imposing conditions of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s). The conditions of approval referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the recordation of the final map for Finance Areas A-D. The improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash deposit, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit acceptable to the Financial Management Director and the City Attorney. Reimbursement If the developer(s) of Finance Areas A-D are required to construct the above improvements they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. June,2000 XVII-17 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD CIRCULATION FACILITIES Facility 6.4 El Fuerte Street -Palomar Airport Road to Alga Road Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement Not Specified Source of Funds If at the time of development of Finance Areas A-D, the City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard; the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction. Financing Guarantee If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be constructed with the development by imposing conditions of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s). The conditions of approval referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the recordation of the final map for Finance Areas A-D. The improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash deposit, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit acceptable to the Financial Management Director and the City Attorney. Reimbursement If the developer(s) of Finance Areas A-D are required to construct the above improvements they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. June,2000 XVII-18 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone I 0 FINANCING METHOD CIRCULATION FACILmEs Facility 6.5 El Camino Real/Alga Road/ Aviara Parkway Intersection Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement Not Specified Source of Funds If at the time of development of Finance Areas A-D, the City Engineer determines that this improvement is necessary to maintain the Growth Management Circulation Performance Standard; the developer of that Finance Area shall finance its construction. Financing Guarantee If determined to be needed at time of development, the City can ensure this improvement will be constructed with the development by imposing conditions of approval on the appropriate tentative map(s). The conditions of approval referenced above, if determined to be needed by the City Engineer, shall be constructed or an improvement agreement shall have been provided by the developer prior to the recordation of the final map for Finance Areas A-D. The improvement agreement shall be in accordance with Section 66462 of the Subdivision Map Act and Section 20.16.060 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. Said improvement agreement shall be secured with one of the following forms of security as described in Section 20.16.070 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code: surety bonds, cash deposit, irrevocable instrument of credit or letter of credit acceptable to the Financial Management Director and the City Attorney. Reimbursement If the developer(s) of Finance Areas A-D are required to construct the above improvements they may be eligible for reimbursements pursuant to Section 20.16.041 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. June, 2000 XVII-19 FIRE FACILITIES -FINANCING Required Facilities None is required. Source of Funds None is required. Financing Guarantee None is required. June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 XVII-20 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 OPEN SP ACE FACILITIES -FINANCING Required Facilities None is required. Source of Funds None is required. Financing Guarantee None is required. June,2000 XVII-21 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 SCHOOL FACILITIES -FINANCING Required Facilities As required by Carlsbad Unified School District or San Marcos Unified School District. Source of Funds Developer shall pay the applicable school fees for each school district. Financing Guarantee Developer funding or participation in Mello-Roos Community Facility District. June, 2000 XVII-22 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 SEWER FACILITIES -FINANCING Required sewer facilities are listed in the special conditions and in the financing matrix of the Sewer Facilities Section (Part XV). Sources of funds and financing guarantee are described below in the financing method for each facility. June,2000 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD SEWER FACILITIES Facility 10.1 12" Sewer Main Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement Sewer Benefit Area Source of Funds This facility shall be funded and constructed in sections by the developer(s). Each developer shall construct the portion of the facility necessary to serve his development and in a manner which would allow for future extension. Financing Guarantee Prior to recordation of any final map in Finance Areas A-D, the required section of this facility shall be constructed, consistent with applicable City Standards; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Reimbursement A developer who constructs this facility shall obtain credit (i.e., waiver) for the cost of construction, including design and incidental costs, up to the amount of SBA fees which would otherwise be payable. If the cost of construction, including design and incidental costs, exceeds the amount of SBA fees payable, the developer shall be reimbursed the excess amount from SBA fees which are subsequently collected, subject to availability. June, 2000 XVII-24 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD SEWER FACILITIES Facility 10.2 12" Sewer Main Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement Sewer Benefit Area Source of Funds This facility shall be funded and constructed in sections by the developer(s). Each developer shall construct the portion of the facility necessary to serve his development and in a manner which would allow for future extension. Financing Guarantee Prior to recordation of any final map in Finance Areas A-D, the required section of this facility shall be constructed, consistent with applicable City Standards; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Reimbursement A developer who constructs this facility shall obtain credit (i.e., waiver) for the cost of construction, including design and incidental costs, up to the amount of SBA fees which would otherwise be payable. If the cost of construction, including design and incidental costs, exceeds the amount of SBA fees payable, the developer shall be reimbursed the excess amount from SBA fees which are subsequently collected, subject to availability. June,2000 XVII-25 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD SEWER FACILITIES Facility 10.3 Pump Station and Force Main Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement Sewer Benefit Area Source of Funds This facility shall be funded and constructed by the developer(s). Financing Guarantee Prior to recordation of any final map in Finance Areas A-D, this facility shall be constructed, consistent with applicable City Standards; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Reimbursement A developer who constructs this facility shall obtain credit (i.e., waiver) for the cost of construction, including design and incidental costs, up to the amount of SBA fees which would otherwise be payable. If the cost of construction, including design and incidental costs, exceeds the amount of SBA fees payable, the developer shall be reimbursed the excess amount from SBA fees which are subsequently collected, subject to availability. June,2000 XVII-26 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 WATERFACILITIES -FINANCING Required water facilities are listed in the special conditions and in the financing matrix of the Water Facilities Section (Part XVI). Sources of funds and financing guarantee are described below in the financing method for each facility. June,2000 XVII-27 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD WATER FACILITIES Facility 11.1 30" Potable Line in Poinsettia Lane Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-O (All) Reimbursement See below Source of Funds This facility shall be funded and constructed by the first developer in Facility Areas A-D. Financing Guarantee Prior to the recordation of final maps, this facility shall be constructed; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Reimbursement A developer of any section of this facility may enter into private reimbursement agreements with owners of properties which benefit from excess capacity on the section which is constructed. June,2000 XVII-28 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD WATER FACILITIES Facility 11.2 12" Potable Line in Poinsettia Lane Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement See below Source of Funds This facility shall be funded and constructed by the first developer in Facility Areas A-D. Financing Guarantee Prior to the recordation of final maps, this facility shall be constructed; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Reimbursement A developer of any section of this facility may enter into private reimbursement agreements with owners of properties which benefit from excess capacity on the section which is constructed. June,2000 XVII-29 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD WATER FACILITIES Facility 11.3 12" Potable Line in Alicante Road Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement See below Source of Funds This facility shall be funded and constructed by the first developer in Facility Areas A-D. Financing Guarantee Prior to the recordation of final maps, this facility shall be constructed; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Reimbursement A developer of any section of this facility may enter into private reimbursement agreements with owners of properties which benefit from excess capacity on the section which is constructed. June,2000 XVII-30 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD WATER FACILITIES Facility 11.4 8" Main in Poinsettia Lane Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement See Below Source of Funds This facility shall be funded and constructed in sections by developers in Facility Areas A-D. Financing Guarantee Prior to the recordation of final maps, sections of this facility shall be constructed, consistent with City standards; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Reimbursement A developer of any section of this facility may enter into private reimbursement agreements with owners of properties which benefit from excess capacity on the section which is constructed. June,2000 XVII-31 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD WATER FACILITIES Facility 11.S 12" Main in Poinsettia Lane Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement See Below Source of Funds This facility shall be funded and constructed in sections by developers in Facility Areas A-D. Financing Guarantee Prior to the recordation of final maps, sections of this facility shall be constructed, consistent with City standards; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Reimbursement A developer of any section of this facility may enter into private reimbursement agreements with owners of properties which benefit from excess capacity on the section which is constructed. June,2000 XVII-32 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 FINANCING METHOD WATER FACILITIES Facility 11.6 16" Main in Poinsettia Lane Special Condition Not Specified Estimated Cost Not Specified Source of Funds Developer Financing Guarantee Improvement Agreement Responsible Area A-D (All) Reimbursement See Below Source of Funds This facility shall be funded and constructed in sections by developers in Facility Areas A-D. Financing Guarantee Prior to the recordation of final maps, sections of this facility shall be constructed, consistent with City standards; or an acceptable security instrument shall be provided to the City; or an improvement agreement shall be executed. Reimbursement A developer of any section of this facility may enter into private reimbursement agreements with owners of properties which benefit from excess capacity on the section which is constructed. June,2000 XVII-33 Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 XVIII. REFERENCES June, 2000 "1994 Planning Study Update" Parsons Engineering Science, April 1995. "Benefit Area Fees For Conveyance System Improvements Update To The December, 1987 City Of Carlsbad Master Plan Of Sewerage" Wilson Engineering, December 1990. "Brief Generation Guide" San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), July 1998. "Capital Improvement Program 1992-1993 to Build Out," "Capital Improvement Program 1999-2000 to Build Out," and "Capital Improvement Program 2000- 2001 to Build Out," City of Carlsbad. "City of Carlsbad Master Plan of Sewerage" Wilson Engineering, January 1992. "City of Carlsbad's Water Reclamation Master Plan" Dudek & Associates, INC., March 3, 1992. "Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan" City of Carlsbad, Revised September 29, 1986. "Encina Water Pollution Facility Wastewater Flows" Encina Water Pollution Control Facility, November 2000. "Habitat Conservation Plan/ Ongoing Multi-Species Plan" City of Carlsbad, Fieldstone/La Costa Associates, California Department of Fish and Game, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, June 1995. "Master Drainage and Storm Water Quality Management Plan" Carlsbad Engineering Department, Fraser Engineering, INC., Cooper Engineering Associates, March 1994. "Sewer Master Plan Update Volume V, October 1997" Carollo Engineers, 1997. "Villages of La Costa Master Plan MP 98-01" Jack Henthorn & Associates, December 2000. "Water Master Plan" Carlsbad Municipal Water District Project No. 89-105, January 29, 1991. XVIII-I Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 XIX. APPENDICES June, 2000 XIX-I Local Facilities Management Plan • Zone 10 A-1 CONSTRAINTS BASE MAP AT 1" = 200' June,2000 XIX-2 N l44,000 N lW,000 ~ --- L{GENO: ZONF BOUNOARY LANO US£ BOUNDARY o· le-300· I SCALE: 1 " • 200' + + ---------- /ANO US£ 0£S/CNATION R.M.H. 5 CONSTRAINTS MAP FOR PROPOSED LAND USE LA COSTA GREENS R£V/S£0 JUNE 8, 200 I REV/SEO APRIL I J. 2001 , C~/!?~T DESIGNED BY, M,8,, ~9, DATE: JNI. 2001 DRAWN BY, T.G., ~.II. SCALE: 1· -200' PROJECT MGR.: LC. JOB NO.: 961002 s 5!jlOO Po~eur Cour1 CMI Eng,Merir,g ENGINEER or WORK: Sui!~ ''° P1annin9 ~---· Carl11bad, Californ.ia ',12l'.l08 Proc.sslnQ ... ·'"' -J DATE: r:.,/g},1, . .~. I , / 760-9J1 -7700 Surveying ~-··' . ·--.. ( __ ., .. 4'· Fe~: 760-931-8680 ' t,. ·-·· "'"'"'·"d0y,::onaultan!B.eom TIMOTHY 0, CARAoll RCE: 5s]i1 ©2000 O'Day Consultants, Inc. ' ~ l4VlOl'.l I ' ' I ' ' \_-~ . ' 1 , • Jlfl:1-' I · r' '·J' \.NJ~-· . l.,/ • ~ "' ,.. --··· ''.?.,, . . . ,',!J{U} . ' I I '. I °>, ' • • ' 1 ' I <, '. \. \ ', ', ', .\ ' ' I , ' • ,' ,' I J 'i'1 ' I ' I , I ' i J 'I ' J ·' 'J .' ·, ' I i ' ' ' ' I',· .... J \J ', '· 1- ' : I I J i, ! i • ,,J;J . !IU • IJJ.I , ( ,' . ' ' I I ' ' ,' ' I ' ' ' ' ,,,,,,, . '. ' I ' I '-.+-"-'-... ~,,,. ' ' ' !\_' - ~2-::, ' ' . "'-,.._ . ·-t-, " -......._ __ -"-. "'--·----~-.._ ' '"- -------o J ', (\./ '. .~ '-· CEN£RAJ. Pl.AN /ANO /JS( 0£SJGNA7'JN = C-F Pl-/,4 E RUI-J RI.N-1 RI.N-6 R!.N-7 R/.11-8 Rl.M-9 Rf.V-10 RUl-11 Rlll-!2 R!.M-TOTA/.. Rf,/-IC /IIIH-5 OS OS-I OS-2 05-J as-, OS-5 OS-6 OS-7 OS-8 OS-TOTAi. P()INSm/,f /AN£ TOTAL ZONE GIIOSS = A 8 79 ---0.1 79 ---0./ 72 ! ------ ' eao ------- J9.9 I ------ 126.2 ------ JO.I ------ J8,I 0.6 --- J.J ---0,2 JO ---0. I 5.9 ---o., 2.9 ---0.1 J27.0 0.6 I. I &6 ----O,J JO.J O.J --- 27.2 r ------ IJ9.1 ---0. I J61 ------ J.I ------ J0.6 ------ &08 ------ 26.9 1.5 --- .5 ------ J.I ,, --- 351.0 76 0. I 13.1 ---IJ.7 756.6 8.5 15.7 • l!l:I -f SUMMARY TABLE ACR{S OF DMLOPM{Nlili CONSTRAINTS (I) ACR{S OF 100% CONTRAINTS (I) SM CON17'4!NT(2) C 0 E F ()(J) H I TO/'Ai J J/2 ---o., ---------------0.8 o., 0.2 ---0. I ---------------0.2 0.2 0./ -----------------------------~ ' ---1.l ---------------/,7 11.0 8.5 ---2.5 ---------------25 75 J.~ ---&5 ---------------&5 252 12.6 ---/,0 ---------------1.0 1.0 2.0 ---lJ ---------------2.9 <5 2,J ---0.5 ---------------0.7 O.J 0./ ---------------------0.1 ------ ---0.5 ---------------0.9 0.2 0./ ---------------------o., ------ ---f7,0 ---------------187 58.l 29.4 ---0.2 ------------------0.5 0.6 0.3· ---0.5 ---------------0.8 5,2 2~ ------------------21.2 21.2 ---·= ------------------1J9.0 1.19.' ------ ------------------J61 ,., ------ ------------------J.I JI ------ ------------------J0.6 J0.6 ------ ------------------80.8 80.8 ------ ------------------22.# 26.9 ------ ------------------6.5 .5 ------ ---------------------,, ------ ------------------316.J 351.0 ------ ---------------------IJ.7 ------ ---!S.2 ------------Jl<J J8&7 65./ 12.6 ' r' SCHOOLS K --- ---,, --- --- --- --------- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -.-- --- --- --- --- ------ --- 72 NET 0£VROPABI.E I I ACRES 6.9 76 --- 69,8 JJ.6 /05,/ 27.4 J0.2 2.5 2.9 1.9 2.5 278.9 78 26.9 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- -- --- 328.I I : ' I ' {Jlf N 3-W,OOU , Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 A-2 CITY OF CARLSBAD-ENCINITAS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT JOINT AGREEMENT June, 2000 XIX-3 AGR:SEJ:1.ENT FOR M .. ~INTE!-TA!ICE Ai.'lD USE OF LEVA.i.~T~ SCEOOL SITE, LA COST.A, EETWEZN TSE CITY OF ORI.Se.AD A:t-tD ENCI?IITAS UNION ELE!-'!E!'?TARY SCHOOL DISTRICT ...ais AG?.EEMENT is · made and entered in to tr.is ...... 16th day of Januari" , ·197..!_, by and b~twee.n the City of Ca:lsbad, a _ __.::.=:--;;;....-- municipal corporation, hereinaf~er referred to as t..~e •city,• and the Enci.n.:itas Onion llementa....-i-y School District, Sa.."l'l Dieg~ county, state of Califoz:nia, hereinafter referred to as t:..~e "Oist:ict.• W.ITNE S S E T 'C' • ... . W:2:?Z..;5, in ore.er. to promote and provide fo= the hea.1.th and gene=a1 we1£are of the people'of Carlsbad, and to cu1.tivate t.~e cevelO?C~:t of good citizenship by an adequate pro~ra.m of . ~ l_ c~~.::t.7...~ity recreation, the parties hereto cesire to enter into an agre~e.~t for a c~It!::lu.~ity recreation program on the Levante School sit.!? wit.ri.in the City; and WEZ?ZA.S, tb.e City has heretofore ere.a ted and established a Park a.nd Rec=ea~on Cor::mission anc has ceveloped and established a park prog=a.~ and-cesires to ewploy persons qualified to s~pervisc, cir~ct, and conduct a recreation progra~ for the City of Carlsbad; w~lEnEAS, the operation of a co~..r:\unity recreation progr~~ on a school distri·ct site or with school district facilities,. through the City Park and Recreat_ion Depart.:.-:-te?nt, ·when said site or f acili t:.ies a.re not in use by the Dist __ rict, ~ill prornott: the health ~nd welfare of the corr.nunity and will cont=ibute to the attainment of the general recreation objectives for children ~nc I ~ within the. corr.r:Ulli ty; and HHE:1721\S, cities and. school ~istri~ts are authorized by· :~~?t~r 10 of Part 7, Division 1, Title 1 of the Education code of·the state of Cal~£ornia to organize, p:ornote, and conduc~ a program of community recreati~n and to op~rate a community recreation-center with.in and wi~hout their te:ritorial limits; w,-r.:::R:::.A..S, it is also provided by said Chapter 10 of Part 7, of ~he Education Code t.~at t..~e foregoing -·,~~~~s necessa.:-J or convenie~t to '-__ .... -:, ,,/. " aid ::--;:.:-.c: o~i:. sue:-. ?U=-?Ose.s; anc. -~ the District owns no~ intend to use said site u~~il such time as co:i..st:--'l.:ction t:i.e use of said site fa= ,....,:::, .. ....,._.:. 0 :: ::i -.... ---,-1-The District sh~ll provide at no cost to the City for outcoor recreational activities the use of the landscaped q=auncs, rc~~roo~ facilities, ---storag~ area and all playground equio~ent ___ ..,-:,....;;__ .. ·--- presently located in the area known as the Levante School site, rurccl ua. 24, Lo~ No. 250 as shown on San Diego Cou..."1t~r Assesso='s M~p No. 7457 1 a copy of which is attached he~eto as Exhibit A and ,udc a pc:l.rt hereof. ., . .... . :.mission and Pa=k and Recreation Depart....tent, agrees to conduct, , t · and ope=at~ on said'site a...~d 9n such faci.l~~-~~a ~nd ,it.:lin .ztin, _ _ ---· --equip~~~~ as may be mac~. availabl~_py the Dis~=ict, a prograc. --- of supe:visec. recreation and t......,_e City agrees to supply all ncccssaey supervision, leada:sh~p, planning, and personnel far . . ~~e maintenance and operation of said program. -------- 3. The City shall at all times be responsible for t....~e pl~nning and operation of the rcc=ention p=ogram, as well as fa=~~= ac~s of ics employees, or any event, thlng, accicent scope of cont:rol of said City -· the C.i.ty. said p=os=a:r. shall co~sist of activities a~d at t~at level as bv the Citv Coun=il or its -- c-ontcm~lated, the City•hereby appoints its Pa~Y.s and necre~tio~ Di.=cct.:::i::-as the representative of the Cit'y and the City's P2.::-k and Rccre~tion Conn.ission, who shall be t..~e responsible manage= 0£ the recreation program,and shiJ.ll coordinate all aspects of thir: p::cgrum ,,.,i th. the Distric't, its governing B-:iard, 2.nd the ? .J.:::-k. .:i.nd n.ccrc.it.ion Corr.mi.~sion of t-ie City. 3. s. City sha1l be allowed to use t.~e site fo= its rec=eational from 8:00 A.M.·u..~t~l 11:00 P.M. dai1y. Eoweve=, the oist=ict shall have priority in the use ~f the site or any part the=eo;, or any facility or eq~ipm~nt thereon fa: Oist:ict purposes if it notifies t.~e City i.., writing at least fo=ty-eight hou.=s ) advance of the intended u.se of the site . . 6. All persons emplo~ed in the per~ormance of services and functions for said City shall be deemed City ~~ployees and no City e~?loyee as such shall be considered as an er::.ployee of the Citv ~=-=lovees ---have any D-4s~ ... --ic~_ -e~s;or:: · c:v:1 -::' .. -., .... ..:.._ saic Ois~ic~ sh~ll no~ be called upon ~8 ass~~e ~ny :: :o= ~aic. Cit.y, o:: any liability other th~n th~t ?=ovi:::e.d :::a= in Said City shall not be liable fo= co~?e~sation ar:.y Dist=-ict ~r::9loyc~ for inju.::-_r or sicJ,-_-i.ess 7. It is fu=thcr conven~nted and agieed, except as other- wise provided, neither party sh~ll be responsible to th~ oth~r party for the cost of this progra.1n. The C4,.ty . .::<:~e~~nts and ___ ag_re:es ,, to be rc~pon~iblc .:ind to pay .:ill ch~rg~s th~t it ~hould incur in ~c~p~ct to the opcr~tion of this rccrcuticn prog=arn, inclucing the ca:::t of ~er.vice of itr. cmploy'ccs .:is well .:lS inci<lcnt:.:i.l co~t.s in connection thcrcwithJ •·------- The District covcn~nts ~nd agre~s to 4. 1.y all costs of. i t.s employees necessary in connec-t.ion wi t.."l· this ..:i said o_; s~--i· ct .J::oc;:rcll11 anl.i, -- " I f'!:U:'ther coveriants and a~rees that no rental charge o= fee will be i..~posed on the City in respect to t.~e operation of t."J.is p=ogra.m. s. The :rec.eation prog:a..~:conducted by the City shall be open to pa~ticipation by any ana all persons residing within the bounc..3.:ies of t..~e Oist=ict and City, but s~c.°'i. pa.:ticipation shcill be ~cl:lject to any rules and regulations adopted by the.Park and Rcc=catio~ D~pa=~~en~ o: the City. ~ !_:"'.e C:l ~! shali rr._ai~ain the lari.c.scaped ~_:_a__E:i...,E~~ .. (i!1g 1 ":.."-:.e res":..:ocm f a:::.J..::.. t.ies at the e:.{-oe:1s e o.:: t-:-.. o ,,.. ; ... . --·---~ .... . ----------··--- , la """'"'e D_i s ~_-ic-= • J.-~ -shall be :espansible fo= all repai=s .e-- Dist=ict stall r:...ake such .,..~~"'; --:: --:"------wit~~~ a reasonable tin~ bci~; re~~estec by the City. -. . ' · ii: ~:ro alt~:at.ions, inp::-overnent:.s or ~dditions shall be mad~ ~ by city wit....~out prior-written approval of District. Any and all alterations, im:1rovements or adc.itions shall be rna·de und perfo:-::ted 'in a good workmanlike rnanne= and in accorc~nce with all stat~tes, orcin~nccs and rcgul~tions applicable thereto. 12·; The District shall provide and pay for .ill wa tc= c:ind .. ~cw~gc utilities necessary to rn~int~in and op~rat~ t.~e ground= and rc~t=oom ~nd stora~~ facilities. 5. .·13~ The City shall provide and pay· for al1 electrical -· ilities necessar"j to mair.tain and'•operat~ the c;rou..""l.d.S and rest- room and storage facilities. 1_4. city and Dist=ict, at their respective ex;i~nse, shall comply with and obse~~e_ and sec~=~ co~pli~nce and obse=vaticn with ) all the requirements of t.~e Carl"sbad Municipal Code and all Hu."\ici?al, County, State and Federal ordinances, codes, statt:tes ' - and regi.!lations now in force or which may herea_fter be in force "-P?licable to the gro1..:....---i.d.s, restroom and storage facilitie·s and . 15-!nsofa=•as it is legally authoriz~d, o:!:ficers da:naces, costs, e..x-:ienses o.;.. -~; "'•...,;, • ..... ., -. -------'----- nny ,;::-~u..-i.c, sit.e., builc.ing, ec;:uipraent, play arc~s, rec::c::i.::.ion f"-cil.ities or pain~ained by Districi. Insofar as it is legally autho=ized, City ~hall hold free ~nd harmless District, me:.~ers of the governing beard, its c~ployc~s, officers and agent~, while acting as such, from all cl.ii~=, lass, d~~ages, costs, exp~nses o= li~bili ty Yhich r.1.:1y 6. ise by reason· of l.iability imposed by· law because of inju.=-J to p~perty or inju....ry too= deat~ of persons, received or suffer~d by reason of operation of the conmr.::..~ity rec=eational proc;::-am upon said pr~~ises and,·. furt.~er, the Ci~ shall be . I responsible for any and all da..~ages to school property caused as a direct result of any rec=eational activity· being conducted on said pr~?t\ises by the City. o: ~:1ic. ci-:y, as well as said Dist=ict, its _o!!ice:=s and res?c:-:.s:.b!.e arise becau~e of 17. ---v,,...._o_,...._. t .,. <:: ..... ,=,.,.-e.;-,.,. ; .. ,.,..,... ... .,...o ... .;,.:: 0,.:: ....... "_,J ,;:.;..-,.,. __ -··.;;;..----;:'-"'_..._ __ , , 19 no ~nd at the a.,.,,.:: ··- pc::-iac.s of time as agreed "t:.pan between t..'h.e City and the District. 18. This agrce~ent rnuy be tcrr:-.inntcd at any time by eith~= ) p~rty hc::-cto upon sixty d~ys written notice. i. :ID ·~ ... ... I • -~ .. ' .. .... .. .; ... ' ( \· ..... ~ _, • ~,. _, • I rr-o--.,. r, 0 _...,., . -;&:.,_ -< ::'.:F . ~ ""'G ~;.:. _...., o, .... 7. • 0 -· '· . .. ·, . ·-·· , ..... . ,•:• ..... ·. -"'I•• •• • . ••• ·.t _., . ·'. .. . ... . . .. . . .... _ . . : · .. • .•I• . : . . . :-.. •. :-:. •. ·- ,. l -...... ·. •I ' . ·. ' .. ·.-. ' ' . ',\. -: .. , ~ ~ .. : / .. ,:., ·. . \ . ' ..... .. . . . . . . .... · . ··.·: ' . . -.. I .. , ,. ,... ::: • ··~ -=. ... :i. ' " .. ... .. .. ~ IN \"'1"1:nrESS WhE:REOF·, the parties have e.xec--.ited this agree!:l.e~~.- the day and year written above. ,\!.:.:'!HA L. R.At;T:::.NKP..:-"u°'iZ, City Clerk /J/. _l;_,ft_, 1.1rd o( Tru!:ilees A?PR0"-1-ZD AS '!'O FORM: C~TY OF CARI.S:SAO, A Munic:i-:lal , Corporation of the State of Cali!o::--:.:..:.. . E~1CINITAS UN'!O?T ~:2?~~;::rt?~Y DISTRIC1:' VINCENT F. EIO~!OO, JR. City l\t .:.orney tt. Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 A-2 CITY OF CARLSBAD-SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT JOINT AGREEMENT June, 2000 XIX-4 AG1U:~V.ENT BETW'EDf TEE C!TY OF CA.USE.AD AND THE SAN M.?.....~COS trnIF!ED SCROOL O!STR!CT REQUESTS R£!MBU~S'2..~ENT FOR WORK A...'rn/SERVICZS PE:.EOR.'1ED SY TEE DISTR!C~ ON CITY PROPERTY TEIS AGR~F"!ENT is ~ade and ~ntered into t..~is day of ------, by and between ~he City of Carlsbad, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the •city• and t..~e sa.n Marcos Unified School District, San Diego County, State of California, hereinafter refer:ed to as the MOist.rict~. WIT N ~SSE TH: WEE~i\S, the City ar.d Dist=ict wish to provide rec=eational and ed~cational facilities fo: the residents cf Carlsbad; and C; ... ,, wisl:es t::i --1 • D:.stric-:. t..~e se:-vices t..~ey have perfo==:ec. l. The City .,..ill pay t..,.e following a..'"loun-:. :or work ar.d services: A. Grading $20,0GO s. Fill Dirt 20,000 c .. Elimination oft.he Ca=intia access 4,000 (mounding and landscaping} o. Fencing top of slopes and the Corintia Street frontage E. Architect & Engineering services TOTAL 8,000 3,000 $55,000 - Aa~eement With San Marcos Unified School Dist=ict Page -r,.,.o 2. The City will administer and contract cu~ the followi~g remaining portion of the park development. A. Soil Amend::nents (turf section) B. Irrigation installation and turf planting c. Purchase and installation of (1) backstop (large field only) D. Purchase and installation of bleachers and d.=inking fountain E. Installation of stai=-way .., :: . !nstal~ation cf walkway, South sec~icn o-_--~ 1 · s--.~oo ... if necessary IN W!'!'!i-ZSS W?:EP.ZO:, the pa=ties have executed this on the c.ay A'!'T;:ST: !U;¼.,/iJ?rz,~ A.LET EA L • I R.~ tJ T:::N ii.A.Ni City Clerk Clerk, Board of Trustees APPROVED AS TO-FOR.~: above. CITY OF CA....~SBAD, A Hunicioal Co::-poration of the State o~ Califo=nia (_ j' /4 /~, C.:.r1--a.~- SAN MARCOS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT President, Board of Truste:s APPROVED AS TO FOR..~: SCHOOL DISTRICT COUNSEL Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 A-3 1996 PARKS AGREEMENT June, 2000 XIX-5 "·· --· _ -::RECORDED REQUEST OF First American Title SUBDIVISION MAPPING DEPT. RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City Clerk CITY OF CARLSBAD 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 632 DOC J 1998-0152412 MAR 20, 199B 2:38 PM ffFICIAL RECIJ:DS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE GREGORY J. SMITH, IIDITY ~:ECORDER FEES: 0.00 111111 IIHHIIII I 1991-0152412 Space Above This Line for Recorder's Use 1996 PARKS AGREEMENT This 1996 Parks Agreement(" AGREEMENT") is made this J.,,u(., dayof ~ , 1997 between the City of Carlsbad, a Municipal Corporation of the State of California ("CITY") and Real Estate Collateral Management Company, a Delaware Corporation ("RECM"), successor-in-interest to the Fieldstone/La Costa Associates, agree as follows: RECITALS A. Between 1972 and the present there have been a series of agreements between the City and major land owners providing for park acquisition and development in the Southeast l..,luadrant, summarized in Exhibit A ("Prior Parks Agreements") attached hereto. B. RECM is now the owner of more than 2,267 acres of development real estate within the City's Southeast Quadrant which encompasses all or portions of Local Facility Management Zones 6, 10, 11 and 12 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Villages of La Costa".) Furthermore, RECM has become successor to the obligations of Fieldstone/La Costa Associates set forth in the 1982 Parks Agreement and all subsequent supplements, specifically the 1988 and 1990 Park Supplements. C. For purposes of this Agreement, the Villages of La Costa consists of the following: 1) The Southwest /Arroyo La Costa includes approximately 481.58 acres in Zone 12, is identified more specifically on Exhibit "B-1" and hereinafter referred to as "Southwest/Arroyo" or "CT 88-3". This property is currently the subject of an Et.If I Bf, 3 633 approved Tentadve Tract Map for 1,076 single family dwellings and associated improvements. 2) The Southeast/Rancheros area consists of approximately 1,112 acres within Zone 11, as more specifically described on Exhibit "B-2" and hereinafter referred to as "Southeast/Rancheros." 3) The Northwest area consists of approximately 674 acres located within Zone 1.0 (currently encumbered by the Deed of Trust referred to in Section 2, in favor of the City of Carlsbad). This property is more particularly described on Exhibit "B-3" and hereinafter referred to as "Northwest." 4) Five (5) isolated, smaller parcels located within Zone 6 more specifically described on Exhibit "B-4" hereinafter referred to as "Remnants." D. As a result of significant change of circumstances and in order to satisfy a condition of Final Map approval for CT 88-3, the City and RECM now desire to modify, amend and fully restructure the Prior Parks Agreements by substituting in its entirety, this Agreement for all purposes to apply to future development of the Villages of La Costa with respect to provision of public parks under the park dedication requirements of the City's Growth Management Program and General Plan. Some of the changed circumstances include, but are not limited to: adjusted development product, areas and densities expected over the Villages of La Costa compared with the assumptions contained in the Prior Parks Agreements; the need for General Plan Amendments and associated Master Plan approvals for the Northwest and Southeast/Rancheros properties occasioned by Growth Management; the recently approved Habitat Conservation Plan, and development that has occurred elsewhere within the Southeast Quadrant on properties eligible to receive parkland credit under the Prior Parks Agreements, affecting the Southeast Quadrant's parks facilities requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, incorporating the foregoing recitals of facts set forth above and in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and obligations contained herein, the parties agree to the following: 2 ·~,,· ' ' . '. )':,.~. 634 1. Supersede Prior Parks Agreement This agreement is intended to fully supersede, replace and substitute for the Prior Parks Agreements for all purposes from and after the effective date of this agreement, and is intended to and shall constitute a novation of the Prior Parks Agreement with respect to future events. 2. Reconveyance of Deed of Trust. Under the Prior Parks Agreements, that certain Deed of Trust and Assignments of Rents, recorded April 14, 1988 as Document Number 88-172276 in favor of the City and encumbering the N onhwest portion of the Villages of La Costa shall be fully reconveyed, released and extinguished by the City upon the recordation of an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication as described in Section 4.2 below. RECM shall pay the cost, if any, of such reconveyance. 3. Satisfaction of Villages of La Costa Parks Obligations. In addition to the City's Growth Management Program and implementing ordinances, the City has adopted the Quimby Act requirement for park land dedication, or the ... payment of fees-in-lieu thereof, in connection with Final Subdivision Maps. The ratio of parkland required under the City's applicable ordinances and policies is 3. 0 acres per 1,000 population ( calculated at the rate of 2. 318 persons per single family detached unit), which dedication or payment of park fees-in-lieu thereofis required as a condition of Final Subdivision Map approval. RECM, or its predecessors in title, have dedicated substantial park acreage to the City in connection with prior project approvals consistent with the Prior Parks Agreements, including advance dedication of parkland in excess of that required for the development that has occurred to date on its land. 3 .1 Carryover Parkland Dedication Credits. RECM is the beneficiarr of prior excess parkland dedication credits consistent with the Prior Parks Agreements and predecessor agreements in the amount of 13. 841 acres as evidenced by the Schedule of Parkland Credits attached hereto, marked Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by this reference (hereinafter "Existing Parkland Credits"). The Existing Parkland Credits are expressed as the number of parkland acres previously 3 ./ 635 dedicated in excess and advance of prior-development requirements on property subject to the Prior Parks Agreements and which directly benefits and is available for future buildout of the Villages of La Costa. 3.2 Parks Reguirements: Anticipated Buildout. Under the Parkland Dedication Requirements of three park acres per 1,000 population the reasonably expected additional parkland required for estimated buildout densities for the Villages of La Costa are as follows: Villages of La Costa Projected Units Parkland Requirements Southwest/ Arroyo 1,073 7.46 acres Northwest 1,000 6.95 acres Soutbeast/Rancheros 1,500 10.43 acres Total 3,573 24.84 acres of parkland The "Projected Units" and associated calculation of "Parkland Requirement" identified above for the Villages of La Costa (hereinafter "Future Parks Requirement") is the parties best current estimates, based on present development standards, of anticipated densities and future parkland requirements and is subject to upward or downward adjustments as further planning is finalized. In Southwest/Arroyo, the 1,073 units represent the number of units set forth on the proposed final maps. With respect to the Northwest and the Southeast/Rancheros, the Projected Units are based on current estimates given by the City's Growth Management Program, midpoint density range, topographic considerations as well as consideration of the recent Habitat Conservation Plan for those areas. The resulting estimate for 24.84 acres of Future Parks Requirements is subject to adjustment, upward or downward, based on future approvals for the affected areas without the need for formal amendments to this Agreement. 3.3 Southwest/ Arroyo Compliance. The parties agree that Southwest/ Arroyo shall utilize 7 .46 acres of the Existing Parkland Credits, leaving a net balance of 6.831 acres, and therefore, the Southwest/ Arroyo has fully satisfied all parkland dedication requirements, including Condition No. 4 of CT 88-3. 4 ) 636 3 .4 Application to Future Development. As the Northwest and Southeast/Rancheros projects obtain approved subdivision maps, RECM may elect to utilize any remaining Existing Parkland Credits, on a unit-by-unit basis, until all such Existing Parkland Credits are fully used. RECM shall notify the City of particular elections to utilize all or a portion of any existing Parkland Credits on one or more particular development projects by delivering to City, to the attention of the Community Development Director, the "Villages of La Costa Existing Parkland Credit Assignment Notice" in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "D". The City agrees to recognize such election and not require an actual dedication of Parkland or Park-in-lieu fees on such project so long as Existing Parkland Credits remain available and are utilized for the particular project or portion thereof. The amount of remaining Existing Parkland Credits shall be adjusted from time to time in accordance with Section 3.2 above. 3.5 Need for Park Access Dedication. In the event it becomes necessary for the City to improve Alga Norte Park as a result of a City Council declared Growth Management Failure prior to the time that access and utilities would otherwise be provided by development and RECM has obtained its first final map in the Northwest, RECM shall provide temporary a.) all weather two lane paved access, and b.) water, sewer and electricity to the Alga Norte Park boundary concurrent with development of said park to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Growth Management Program -Southeast Quadrant. The City is evaluating the need for and possible locations of future parkland to meet the requirements of the Growth Management Ordinance and the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan. The Parties hereto wish to provide for the possibility that such future parks demands ma~• be satisfied from property located in the Northwest portion of the Villages of La Costa. 4 .1 Alga Norte Park RECM hereby agrees to reserve (and offer to dedicate pursuant to Section 4.2 below) up to approximately 32.9 acres within the Northwest portion of the Villages of La 5 ) 637 Costa property as a potential future site for Alga Norte Park. The park area is more particularly shown on the schematic drawing attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and is more fully set forth in the legal description attached hereto as Exhibit "F", both incorporated herein by this reference, (hereinafter "Alga Norte Park"), as satisfaction of Southeast Quadrant Requirements. 4.2 Irrevocable Offer of Dedication Concurrently with recordation of the Reconveyance of Deed of Trust described in Section 2 above, RECM shall execute and record an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication in accordance with Government Code Section 7050 in the form attached hereto marked "Exhibit G" incorporated herein by this reference, ("Park IOD") for fee title to all or any portion of the Alga Norte Park. Acceptance of the Park IOD shall be expressly subject to each of the following terms and conditions. 4. 3 Date of Acceptance/Rejection 4.3 .1 City agrees to make its determination of the final configuration of the desired site for Alga Norte Park on or before the date of the approval of the first master I tentative map within Local Facilities Management Zone 10. 4.3.2 If no master tentative map 'is approved on the Northwest within two years from the date of this agreement, the City may then, at any time accept all or any portion of the Park IOD, but no later than the first final subdivision tract map for the Northwest. When City determines the final configuration, the City Council shall accept and record all or so much of the 32.9 acres as City determines necessary for said park. 4.3.3 !f the City does not acquire the entire 32.9 acre parcel, it will use its best efforts and good faith to reject a remainder parcel of such size and location as to be reasonably developable, consistent with future development of the balance of the Northwest. City and RECM shall use their best efforts and good faith to cooperate and mutually agree on any final configuration and issues of access, utilities and similar development issues affecting the portion to be accepted, and the balance of the property. The parties understand and acknowledge that roads, utilities and similar easements may be necessary and both parties intend to cooperate in 6 _j 638 connection therewith, prior to as well as after the Park IOD and City's acceptance thereof. 4.3.4 If less than the entire parcel is accepted by the City, the City will record a rejection of the remainder of the Park IOD, Quitclaim Deed, or other instrument necessary to clear title to the remainder, at the same time as recordation of the acceptance. 4.4 Title Title to the Alga Norte Park property shall be free and clear of all monetary liens and other debilitating encumbrances which would have substantial adverse impact on the proposed park use at time of acceptance of all or any portion of the Park 10D, and RECM shall provide the City a preliminary title report for the City's review and approval at least sixty (60) days prior to the City's anticipated acceptance date. If the City wishes to obtain title insurance, the City will be responsible for the cost of any such premiums. 4.5 Exterior Boundary Survey/Map RECM will cause the proposed Alga Norte Park acceptance parcel boundary to be surveyed within sixty (60) days of notification of the final boundary for purposes of acceptance by the City. To the extent that compliance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act is required, the City shall be solely responsible for satisfying, at its own expense, any subdivision map obligations, including certification through issuance of a Certificate of Compliance or other necessary instrument or map to create a legal parcel and that any remainder portion of the approximately 32. 9 Alga Norte Park Parcel are valid, legal parcel(s) within the Subdivision Map Act and applicable local ordinances or policies, including the provision of access to and utilities through the park and any remainder parcel 4.6 Cost of Accept",~ The City shall cause the acceptance/rejection documents to be recorded and shall be responsible for any Title Insurance premium and any escrow fees shall be split equally between the parties. The parties agree that no documentary transfer taxes are payable based on the City's acceptance of all or any portion of the Park 10D. 7 ,; r 639 4.7 Payment Program If the City accepts the Park !OD in an amount in excess of the amount of total Parkland Requirement as computed in Section 3 .2 as adjusted from time to time, the City shall pay RECM for such excess dedication. The amount of excess parkland shall be determined by subtracting the amount of parkland required in Section 3.2, as adjusted from time to time, from the number of acres actually accepted by the City under this Agreement, plus any remaining Existing Parkland Credits. The-total payment, due RECM for excess parkland accepted, if any, by the City shall be equal to the amount of excess parkland computed as described above times $175,000 per acre which amount shall be the total payment due. Payment to RECM shall be made from Park In-Lieu Fees collected in the Southeast Quadrant deemed to be available by the City Council at the earliest opportunity. If Park In-Lieu fees from the Southeast Quadrant are insufficient or unavailable to fully pay RECM the amount due under this section, the City shall annually review the amount of Park In-Lieu Fees received within the Southeast Quadrant and shall pay to RECM any fees that are deemed to be available by the City Council on a first priority basis until the total amount due has been paid. No ... interest shall accrue on any unpaid balance. The City shall in any event make the first payment under this section to RECM by the thirty-first day of July following the date of acceptance of the Park !OD. The City Council may, at its discretion, approve an earlier payment, if funds are available. The City is not obligated in any way to make payments to RECM from any source other than Park In-Lieu Fees collected in the Southeast Quadrant. 4.8 Accommodation in Northwest Master Plan RECM shall continue to include the location of the Park IOD in its future planning for the Northwest, and shall provide for alternative development should the City determine to satisfy all or a portion of the Southeast Quadrant Requirement from other property or in another manner. The parties agree to cooperate reasonably in the future planning process for the Northwest in order to achieve the purpose of this Agreement. 8 640 4.9 Abandonment by City If the City determines not to use the Park 10D for a park, it shall record a rejection of the entire Park 10D, Quitclaim Deed or other instrument necessary to clear title as reasonably requested or required by RECM as quickly as is reasonably possible but not later than one year following the determination by the City Council that the Park IOD is not desired. 4.10 Other Park Property It is currently the City's intent to accept and develop the Alga Norte Park, as described in this agreement, to meet the demands of the Growth Management Program for the Southeast Quadrant, subject to the conditions described in this agreement. The prior off er to dedicate park property in San Marcos Canyon is no longer intended to be accepted as described in the 1982 Parks Agreement. The City hereby agrees to identify and vacate, rescind or otherwise to proceed with the necessary actions to release the property to RECM within one year from execution of this agreement. 5. Responsible Parties The name of the persons who are authorized to give written notices or to receive written notice on behalf of the City and on behalf of the RECM in connection with the foregoing are as follows: For City: ForRECM: Community Development Director Mr. Marty Orenyak 2075 Las Palmas Dr. Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Real Estate Collateral Management James M. Jackson Vice President PO Box 9000-685 Carlsbad, CA 92018 6. Satisfaction of Southwest/ Arroyo Condition Execution of and compliance with this Agreement fully satisfies Condition No. 4 of the Conditions of Approval for the Southwest/ Arroyo tentative map as well as establishing full compliance with the parkland Dedication Requirements and all Southeast Quadrant 9 641 park requirements of the Carlsbad Growth Management Program, or other Carlsbad ordinances, policies or procedures including the implementation of the Quimby Act applicable to the Villages of La Costa. 7. General Provisions. 7 .1 Successors and Assigns This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties their respective assigns and successors, and the successive owners of the Villages of La Costa, provided, however, payment for any excess parkland and the assignment of Existing Parkland Credits to specific properties shall be the personal property of RECM. Credits and payments may be made available to subsequent purchasers of portions of the Villages of La Costa property to satisfy the future Parkland Dedication Requirement of said subdividers as directed by RECM based upon receipt of written authorization by City from RECM in the form of the "Villages of La Costa Existing Parkland Credits Assignment Notice," attached hereto as Exhibit "D," indicating the amount of such credit or payment to be made to subsequent subdividers of Villages of La Costa. RECM shall provide the City with such written notice of the transfer or a separate notice of any non-transfer of the rights to receive payment or crc:dits within thirty (30) days of the transfer of any property subject to this Agreement. Should for any reason the "Villages of La Costa Existing Parkland Credits Assignment Notice" or separate notice of non-transfer not be provided to the City, then the City shall not allocate any payment ,or credit ,or reimbursement, to any other property. 7 .2 Construction. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole in accordance with its fair meaning, the captions being for the convenience of the parties only and not intended to describe or define the provisions and the portions of the Agreement to which they pertain. Both parties acknowledge that they understand the terms and conditions of this Agreement and execute the Agreement without force or duress. Neither party shall deny the enforceability of any provision of this Agreement on the basis that it did not have legal counsel, or that it did not understand a term or condition of this Agreement. Both parties to this Agreement acknowledge that they have been represented by counsel 10 and/or advisors of their own choice and that neither party shall be deemed to have primary responsibility for drafting this Agreement. 7 .3 Waiver No waiver by either party of any default, breach, or any other term set forth herein shall constitute a waiver of any other default, breach or term whether of the same or any other convenant or condition. 7.4 Severability If any portion of this agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall be given its _full and fair meaning in order to effectuate the purposes of this agreement. 7. 5 Amendments No change or addition to this agreement, or any part or portion thereof, shall be valid unless in writing and signed by all parties hereto. 7. 6 Entire Agreement This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties hereto respecting the .. subject matter covered. This Agreement supersedes and replaces any and all previous discussions, negotiations and writings between the parties hereto, superseding and replacing all negotiations, prior discussions, preliminary agreements,. the Prior Parks Agreements or understanding respecting the subject matter whether written or oral. 7. 7 No Third Party Beneficiary Nothing contained herein is intended nor shall be construed as benefiting any third party, or member of the public, nor shall it create or authorize any claims, causes of action or any legal proceedings to interrupt or enforce this Agreement other than by the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. 11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. lts: __ Ma__..y'-o_r __________ _ ~ f. £a~ City Clerk J APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~1ty Attorney REAL EST ATE COT T , ... "T"'T:RAL MANAGEMENT poration 12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ACKNOWLEDGMENT ) ) ss. ) 6.4 4 On 11/27/96 , before me,vivian Mae Walters, personally appeared James M. Jackson and Spiro G. Kailas , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s} is/are subscribed to the within i~strument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature{s} on th~ instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ,hJJ1A11l'--fww~ Notary Public in and for said County and State [SEAL] "EXIDBIT A" Historical Summary 645 A. The previous parks agreements and supplements hereto, and the parties to those agreements have been: 1. "1973" Parks Agreement" -City and La Costa Land Company 2. Supplements to the 1973 Parks Agreement (October 15, 1973 and July 18, 1974) - City and La Costa Land Company 3. · "1978 Parks Agreement" -City and La Costa Land Company 4. "1982 Parks Agreement" -City and Daon Corporation 5. "1988 Parks Supplement" (to the 1982 Parks Agreement) -City and BCE Development Company 6. Parks Agreement Subrogation (Fieldstone Company) -City and Continental Bank 7. "1990 Parks Supplement" (to the 1982 Parks Agreement) -City and Fieldstone/La Costa Associates Limited Partnership B. The 1973 Parks Agreement, all supplements thereto, and the 1978 Parks Agreement, were superseded by the 1982 Parks Agreement. As a result, those agreements and supplements preceding the 1982 Parks Agreement are of no further in force and effect. C. The 1982 Parks Agreement intended to_ (1) satisfy the 1980 Master Plan requirements for a parks agreement, (2) allow for an accelerated dedication of the La Costa North Community Park (hereinafter referred to as Alga Norte Park) (3) continue the dedication of the Stagecoach Park at an accelerated rate until the full park site of 28 acres was dedicated, (4) delete the San Marcos Creek Park site; and (5) provide instead for the dedication of the portions of the San Marcos Canyon which had not been dedicated previously. D. The 1988 Parks Supplement to the 1982 Parks Agreement was a necessary amendment to the existing agreement as part of an ongoing planning process, the implementation of the City's Growth Program and the adoption of the Public Facilities Performance Standards in 1986. Furthermore, the 1988 supplement was intended to do the following: (1) satisfy the Master Plan requirements for parks acreage; and (2) allow for the accelerated dedication and joint financing of the construction of improvements for Alga Norte Community Park. The accelerated dedication of Alga Norte Park required BCED, (succeeded by Fieldstone) to dedicate 35 acres of parkland prior to the time the actual parkland requirements would be determined (normally, as the revised Master Plan for LFMP Zone 10 was prepared and approved). Provisions for reimbursement of parkland dedication over and above those requirements ultimately identified through the eventual Master Plan approval process, were also specified. To date, the revised Master Plan has not been submitted for approval, nor adopted by the City. In order to guarantee availability of funding to construct improvements for the Alga Norte Park site ( or a portion thereof) and therefore meet the requirements of the Growth Management 14 646 Program, provisions to guarantee $2,241,265 from BCED, (successor; Fieldstone) to construct improvements for 19.4 acres of the 35 acre Alga Norte site were also specified. The agreement to provide the advanced dedication for 35 acres of parkland and $2,241,265 for construction of improvements was secured by a Deed of Trust in favor of the City of Carlsbad encumbering the entire 765.9 acres of the property owned by BCED (successor; Fieldstone) located within Local Facilities Management Zone 10. Upon receipt by the City of appropriate documentation dedicating the 35 acres of parkland and upon delivery and acceptance of a letter of credit in the amount of $2,241,265 as substituted security for park improvements construction, at the time of recordation of the first final map of property owned by BCED, (successor; Fieldstone) in Local Facilities Management Zone 12, the City agreed to reconvey the Deed of Trust. The City currently retains the Deed of Trust for 765.9 acres of land in Local Facility Management Zone 10, because the advanced dedication of 35 acres of parkland and the $2,241,265 for construction has not occurred as specified in the 1988 Parks Supplement. E. Subsequent to the execution of the 1988 Parks Supplement, the property then owned by BCED was sold to the Fieldstone Company/La Costa Associates, Limited. Partnership; transferred to Continental Bank; acquired by Bank of America; and most recently transferred by Bank of America to its real estate subsidiary, Real Estate Collateral Management Company, a Delaware Corporation (RECM). F. On May 22, 1990 an additional supplement to the 1982 Parks Agreement (1990 Parks Supplement) was approved by the City of Carlsbad between the City and Fieldstone/La Costa Associates limited partnership. The 1990 Supplement specifically amended the 1982 Parks Agreement to include rather than exclude the subdivision property known as Santa Fe Knolls Unit 3 (CT 85-5). Consequently, Park Dedication credits were accepted, acknowledged and accounted for as indicated on the Stagecoach Community Park "Park Dedication Inventory Matrix" dated March 6, 1990 (reference Carlsbad City Council Agenda Bill #10,626), including Santa Fe Knolls Unit 3. 15 ·, 1: i' -e:'f rt(o', Sl\J· S-- 647 ORDER NO. 1126321-11 co~~ENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, SOUTH 02°31'38 11 EAST, 340.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOlJ"NDARY SOUTH 02°31'38" EAST, 468.13 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 10, SOUTH 0 3 ° 2 9' 2 7" EAST, 7 6 0 . 0 0 FEET; THENCE CONTIJ:HJING ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH O 3 ° 2 9' 2 7" EAST, 18 6 9 . 7 0 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 10, SAID CORNER BEING IN THE CENTER LINE OF OLIVEHAIN ROAD, ACCORDING TO SAN DIEGO COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 1631, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 10 AND SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 87°03'30" EAST, 509.61 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE BEA.RS SOUTH 02°56'30" EP,ST TO SAID POINT, SAID POIN7 BEING THE SOUTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 454 (KNOWN AS RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD} AS. DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED JANUARY 21, 1930 IN BOOK 1731, PAGE 4 OF DEEDS; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 10, NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO ~.1:1 INTERSECTION WITH A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 87°30'00" EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 8 7 ° 3 0' 0 0 11 WEST, 3 3 5 0. 0 0 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM LOTS 1 THROUGH 86 INCLUSIVE OF SANTA FE RIDGE UNIT NO. 2, CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 83-16, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO 1'1AP THEREOF NO. 10857, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COuNTY, FEBRUARY 28, 1984. AFFECTS P.~.RCEL NOS. 255-031-24 AND 255-031-25. PARCEL G: LOT 13 OF LA COSTA CANADA, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7205, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY ON FEBRUARY 15, 1972. AFFECT PARCEL NO. 216-320-13. PAGE 26 ' • I t • I -e. 2-· --648 ~ --~ .,,.:.. .. ~w ,'/1,, ____ :,,. :./,_ .. ,.. <..-....;.:-' ORDER NO. 1126324-11 ! LEGAL DESCRIPTION 00\J:ut~~T ..:0: THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL X: LOT 5 AND THE WEST HALF OF LOT 6 AND LOT 8 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF S}...N DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNI.!\., ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 75-9 (B) UNIT NO. 2, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 9959, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 31, 1980 AND THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 13524, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 25, 1984 AS FILE NO. 84-403293 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF. -- ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY TERMINUS OF THE CENTERLINE OF LA COSTA AVENUE AS SHOWN ON HEREINBEFORE MENTIONED PARCEL MAP NO. 13524; THENCE NORTH 55°00'00" EAST 200.89 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1000.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF HEREINBEFORE MENTIONED LOT 5 OF -RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-060-15, 223-060-49 AND 264-222-03. PARCEL AA: THE WEST HALF OF SECTI~N 32 AND THE EAST HALF OF SECTION 31, ALL BEING IN TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, ALL BEING IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. T:ll/li/95 l~:12:40 V, / MF CC PAGE 26 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 50\JTttW'i=:SI 649 ORDER NO. 1126321-11 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL C: ALL OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF FR.l-,.CTIONAL SECTION l _ AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 8 O? FRACTICNAL SECTION 2, IN TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, FU\.NGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNJ:I.RDINO BASE P.ND MERIDI~.N, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, TOGETHER WITH LOT 2 AND A PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 11 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COU?JTY, JUNE 27, 1898, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDP.RY OF SJ:I.ID RANCHO LAS 2NCINITAS, NORTH 76°21'30" EAST, 892.92 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 CF FRACTIONAL SECTION l; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY L:NE NORTH 1°35'31" EAST, 1094.53 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG TH~ NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 1, NORTH 89°17'25" WEST, 1583.77 FEET TO P..N ANGLE POINT THEREIN; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE .l:\.ND ALONG THE NORTHERLY LIN~ O? SAID FRACTIONAL SECTION 2, NORTH 89°17'41" WEST, 993.40 FEET AN AN'GLE POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY BOUND.~.RY OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN EXECUTORS' DEED AN'D CONSERVATORS DEED TO W. B. DALITZ, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19, 1969 AS FILE NO. 164971 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LP...ND SOUTE 58°25'31" WEST, 1851.09 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT P.ND SOUTH 56°30'28" WEST, 1100.64 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY LINE OF COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ROAD SURVEY NO. 1800-1, BEING THAT CERTAIN 90 FOOT STRIP OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN EXECUTOR'S DEED AND CONSERVATORS' DEED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1970 AS FILE NO. 27777 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND ALSO BEING A POINT IN A NON-TANGENT 1970.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCJ:I.VE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 58°40'29" WEST; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD SURVEY AS FOLLOWS: T: 11/l7195 l 0:27 :24 V: I / : : JL 00 PAGE 22 650 ORDER NO. 1126321-11 SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 4 ° 56 1 2 0" AN A.RC DISTANCE OF 169. 81 FEET, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 36°15 1 51'' EAST, 291.95 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 2045.00 FOOT RP.DIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 32°30'56" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1160.54 FEET, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH, 3°44'55" EAST, 1061.59 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 9045.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 3°01'18" AN Jl,..RC DISTANCE OF 477.02 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE HEIRS OR DEVISEES OF FRIEDA C. WIEGAND, DECEASED, ET AL, RECORDED FEBRUARY 25, 1971 AS FILE NO. 35748 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, RA.DIAL TO LAST SAE) CURVE NORTH 89°16'23" EAST, 398.31 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID R.A..l\J'CHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE hlONG SAID WESTERLY LINE SOUTH 20°02'35" EAST, 686.02 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 12 OF SAID RANCHO LJl.S ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY PROLONGATION AND SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 87°3 0 1 15" EAST, 698.33 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE EASTERLY 2505.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 11 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 2 ° 55' 51" WEST, 2107. 50 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 2107.50 FEET OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 87°30'15" EAST, 2505.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 11 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 2 ° 5 5' 51" WEST, 5 2 6 . 9 8 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 2 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 2 NORTH 1°58'05" WEST, 807.94 FEET TO THE POINT.OF BEGINNING. ?'?ECTS p;..RCEL NOS. 255-010-24, 255-010-25, 255-022-01, 255-030-11, 255-030-12, 255-030-13, 255-041-18, 255-041-19 AND 255-041-20. PARCEL D: THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2 AND 3 IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, ALSO THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ALSO THE WEST 50 ACRES OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, ALL IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PAGE 23 J::. •. ··. -,. --~' ~ . ~ 651 ....... . / f:;' :~--;,;-~-::--ORDER NO. 1126321-ll j BEGINNING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35, NORTH 89<l07'13" WEST, 1318.40 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST F.ALF; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF, SOUTH 0°33'46" WEST, 2649.70 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89°18'14" WEST, 50.25 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ROAD SURVEY NO. 1800 -1 EL CAMINO REAL -ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON- TANGENT 3030.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 74 Q 5 9' 19" EAST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6°09'33" AN Jl..RC DISTANCE OF 325.73 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 8°51'08" EAST, 288.92 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1970.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°28'17" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 772.64 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 56°30'28" EAST, 1100.78 FEET; THENCE NORTH 68°25'31" EAST, 1851.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 5 0 ACRES OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 50 ACRES NORTH 0°33'05 11 EAST, 1323.11 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE NOR7H LINE OF SAID WEST 50 ACRES NORTH 89°18' 37 11 WEST, 1646 .40 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, NoRr_H 0°34' 20" EAST, 1322 .81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS LYING NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 75-7 GREEN VALLEY KNOLLS, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 8379, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-24, SPANISH VILLAGE UNIT NO. 1, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7895, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 255-010-19, 255-010-26 AND 255-010-27. -------- PARCEL E: ALL THAT PORTION OF LOTS 1 AND 2 IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF AND ALL THAT PORTION OF LOTS 3 AND 4 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898, ALL BEING IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS FOLLOWS: PAGE 24 '( ~~~-? ' ' 652 ORDER NO. 1126321-11 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, SOUTH 89°51'26" EAST, 280.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71 ° 00' 00 11 EAST, 1545, 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RETRACING SOUTH 71°00'00" WEST, 1545.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE NORTH 89°51' 2 6 11 WEST, 2 8 0. 0 0 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 89°51'52" WEST, 956.82 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 IN SAID SECTION l; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 2, SOUTH 1094.53 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 75°47'10" WEST, 892.92 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, SOUTH 02°32'35" EAST, 340.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 87°30'00" EAST, 3350.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS TO THE CENTER LINE OF COUNTY ROAD SURVEY NO. 454 -KNOWN AS RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD -AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, RECORDED JANUARY 21, 1930 IN BOOK 1737, PAGE 4 OF DEEDS; THENCE NORTHERLY A.ND NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 52°00'00 11 EAST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 52°00'00" WEST, 485.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHERLY BOUND~.RY OF CARLSBAD TR.~CT NO. 73-2 (SP.NTA FE GLENS), IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF S~.N DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO M.~P THEREOF NO. 8059, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF S~.N DIEGO COUNTY, JANU~.RY 22, 1975. AFFECTS PARCEL NO. 255-030-09. PARCEL F: THAT PORTION OF LOTS 3, 4, 9 AND 10 OF RANCHO LAS ENCINITAS, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 848, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1898, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PAGE 25 4 ,' I 653 ~~~ -~~v~ffff?//!::.' -. .,;. ,.-:--:.,..:: \.;.. .(:_~-ORDER NO. 1126324-11 EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID SECTION 31, ALL THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHWESTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TR.ACT NO. 72-20 (LA COSTA VALE) UNIT NO. 3, IN THE CITY OF CJ>..RLSBl:iJJ, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7950, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 3, 1974. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL TP.F.T PORTION THEREOF LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST ONE HALF OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'42" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST ONE HALF, 2689.53 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOU'.:H O O O 3 6' 3 8" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST ONE K!l..LF, 3120.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 200.00 FOOT s~~~ DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EASEMENT IN BOOK 5208, PAGE 399 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE P..ND ALONG SAID EP..SEMENT LINE, NORTH 64°13'23" WEST, 2226.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°08'00" WEST, 65.20 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE, SAID LINE BEING 45.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF 200. 00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GP..S A.ND ELECTRIC COMPP...NY EASEMENT; THENCE NORTH 64 ° 13' 23 11 WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 1583.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 7950; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 64°13'23" WEST TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, SAID INTERSECTION BEING THE POINT OF TERMINU.?· ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION THEREOF LYING SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE FOLLOWING LINE: EEGI:t-.i"lHNG AT THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20 AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 7950, SAID CORNER BEING A POINT ON THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT 1230.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL _TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 51 ° 54' 08 11 WEST; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20, THE FOLLOWING COURSES: NORTHERLY ALONG THE A.RC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'46" A DISTANCE OF 312.99 FEET, NORTH 38°50'03" EAST, 31.80 FEET. TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1480. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°19'57" A DISTANCE OF 189.40 FEET; THENCE ~9.RTR 46°10'00" EAST, 1057.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE-- LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE SOUTH 43 ° 50' 00 11 EAST, 168.:. 42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5 3 ° 3 9 ' 3 2 11 EAST, 4 2 . 0 0 FEET TO A PO INT ON THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 53°39'32" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE TO PAGE 27 654 ORDER NO. 1126324-11 THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31, SAID INTERSECTION BEING THE POINT OF TERMINUS. ALSO EXCEPTING THE INTEREST CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 16, 1967 AS FILE NO. 21426 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, LYING WITHIN THOSE PORTIONS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 66398-A: THAT PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, LYING WITHIN A STRIP OF LA.~D 60 FEET WIDE, 30 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE FG~LOWING DESCRIBED CENTER LINE: COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTER LINE OF ROAD SURVEY NO. 454, A PLAT OF WHICH IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER, WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER BEING DISTANT ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 721.98 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, SAID POINT BEING ENGINEER'S STATION 194 PLUS 74.85, POINT ON A 1000 FOOT RA.DIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY ON SAID CENTER LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTER LINE AS FOLLOWS: SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID 1000 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, 36.54 FEET AND TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 7°22' EAST, 12.41 FEET TO THE TRUE PO:::NT OF BEGINNING AND THE BEGINNING OF A 1200 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 82°38' WEST FROM SAID POINT; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTER LINE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 71°50', A DISTANCE-OF 1504.47 FEET TO ENGINEER'S STATION 210 PLUS 87.12 P9INT OF TERMINATION ON THE CENTER LINE OF SAID ROAD SURVEY NO. 454. PARCEL 66398-B: THAT PORTION OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER LYING SOUTHERLY OF PARCEL 66398-A HEREINABOVE DESCRIBED, AND NORTHERLY OF SAID ROAD SURVEY NO. 454. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO MAG PROPERTIES, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 1, 1990 AS FILE NO. 90-057460 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CAL:FORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 494 OF MAP NO. 7950, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID fvl'.AP NO. 7950: THENCE SOUTH 31°00'00" WEST, 46.04 PAGE 28 Si==-4--655 ORDER NO. 1126324-11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5 9 ° 0 0 ' 0 0 11 EAST. 71 . 0 0 FEET TO A PO INT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID MAP SAID POINT BEING ON A NON-TANGENT 1520.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND SAID BOUNDARY LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 9°19'02", A DISTA.."T\JCE OF 247.18 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON A NON-TANGENT 700. 00 FOOT RADiuS REVERSING CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 73°26'32" WEST; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 700.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°43'55", A DISTP..NCE OF 326.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 10°10'27" EAST, 474.67 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 2400.00 FOOT R.Jl.DIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHE.?;.STER~Y ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 ° 24' 4 9", A DIST.~CE OF 64 5. 64 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 1170.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID !?OINT EEARS SOUTH 31°17'17" EAST; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID 1170. 00 CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 ° 14' 41", A DISTANCE OF 127.52 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 25°02'36" EAST, 60.00 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 1230.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 25°02'36" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22°45'14", A DISTANCE OF 488.47 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON- TANGENT 24 00. 00 RADIUS CURVE, CONC.P>.VE NORTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 33°56'33" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY Jl...LONG THE ARC OF SAID 2400. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°35'06'', A DISTAJ-JCE OF 317.72 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41°31'39" EAST, 6 3 . 0 0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 6 4 ° 5 0 ' 2 5 11 EP..ST, 2 6 5 . 0 9 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2 8 ° 21' 2 7" WEST, .501 . O O FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31 ° 16 ' 3 2 11 EAST 6 2 . 6 3 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT 700.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTR.A.L ANGLE OF 30°22' 01", A DISTANCE OF 371.00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 28°21'27" WEST, 470.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 1000.00 FOOT R.Jl.DIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°59'01", A DISTANCE OF 139.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 53°39'32" WEST, 42.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43°50'00" WEST, 1685.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46°10'00" EAST, 465.5..8.FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1520. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5°50'58", A DISTANCE OF 155.18 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-050-67 AND 223-050-69; 223-071-05 AND 223-071- 07. PAGE 29 656 ORDER NO. 1126324-ll PARCEL BB: THOSE PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAPS BEING PARCELS 223-050-51, 223-050-52, 223-050-53, 223- 050-54, 223-050-59, 223-050-65 AND 223-071-09 LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST HALF; THENCE SOUTH 8 9 ° 5 3' 4 2" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 2 6 8 9. 53 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 00°36'38" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST HALF, 3120.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 200.00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC EASEMENT, RECORDED APRIL 19, 1954 IN BOOK 5208, PAGE 399 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE AND ALONG SAID EASEMENT LINE, NORTH 64 ° 13' 23" WEST, 2226. 43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°08'00" WEST, 65.20 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE, SAID LINE BEING 45. 00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 200.00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE NORTH 64°13'23" WEST ALONG SAID PP..RALLEL LINE, 1583. 3 6 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUND;...RY LINE OF LA COSTA VALE UNIT NO. 3, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7950, FILED IN-THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 3, 1974; THENCE NORTH 31°00'00" EAST ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE, 45.19 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID MAP NO. 7950; THENCE NORTH 64 °13' 23" WEST ALONG. THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 7950, A DISTANCE OF 1326.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43°30'00" WEST 477.59 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT 1720.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A ~IAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 43 °30, 00" WEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG s;...ID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°50'00" A DISTANCE OF 85.06 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 43°40' WEST 445.15 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 455. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, WESTERLY AND SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 96°50'00" A DISTANCE OF 768.98 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 39°30'00" WEST 153.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 7 8 0 . 0 0 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCA VE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°59'38" A DISTANCE OF 122. 44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20, UNIT NO. 2, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7779, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 2 6 , 19 7 3 ; THENCE LEAVING SAID MAP NO. 7 9 5 0 AND ALONG THE BOUNDARY Of SAID MAP NO. 7779, NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 71°00'00" WEST 269.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°00'00" WEST 965.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71°13'23" WEST 276.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77°46'50" WEST 290.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 59°50'00" WEST 121.23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83°40'00" WEST 114.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14°40'00" WEST 230.00 FEET; PAGE 30 I ' 657 ORDER NO. 1126324-11 THENCE SOUTH 28°20'30" WEST 436.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18°27'30" EAST 218. 11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 25 ° 0 3' 2 8" WEST 16 5. 0 0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°56'32" WEST 300.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'13" WEST 110.03 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 100.00 FOOT EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS A.ND ELECTRIC COMPANY, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COm:JTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COm:ITY, APRIL 19, 1954 IN BOOK 5208, PAGE 403 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 7779 AND ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOm:IDARY OF SAID EASEMENT NORTH 6 4 ° 5 6 ' 3 2 11 WEST TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF CP-..RLSBAD TRACT NO. 75-4 (LA COSTA ESTATES NORTH), IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF S~..N DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 8302, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 5, 1976; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF NORTH 25°03'28" EAST 100.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03°02'10" WEST 495.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20°25'10" EAST 280.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05°30'00" WEST 130.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 36°55'10'' EAST 345.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 52°15'00" EAST 160.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10179, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBP....D, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF TP.E COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1980 P..S FILE NO. 80-204502 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF ~IA? NO. 8302 AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL MAP NC. 10179, SOUTH: 26°58'00" EAST 346.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°43-' 11" EAST 880 .46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42°13' 10" EAST 281.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49°46' 54" EAST 170.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42°42'30" EAST 530.00 ?EET; THENCE NORTH 66°24'35" EAST 174.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°58'20" EAST 145.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34°29'10" EAST 309.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°00'21" EAST 145.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41°27'00" EAST 113.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85°44'40" EAST 271.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31°57'15" EAST 330.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°25'05" EAST 129.10 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF NORTH 89°43'11" EAST 2607.74 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SECTION 25 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 8302. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST Q:JARTER, SOUTH 0°36'31" WEST, 950.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31°28'50" WEST, 341.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°42'49" WEST, 456.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76°12'27" WEST 230.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 0°36'31" E.~ST, 77.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°23'29" WEST, 350.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 O 3 6 ' 31 II WEST, 2 6 5 . 0 0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4 6 ° 2 8 I O 7 II EAST' 6 8 . 2 8 PAGE 31 , • I l 658 ORDER NO. 1126324-il FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55°28'26" EAST 34.95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67°10'26" EAST, 76.69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°23'29" EAST, 110.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78°04'47" EAST, 92.20 FEET TO A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0°36'31" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, NORTH 0°36'31 11 EAST, 263.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHERLY HALF OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 89°53'42" EAST 496.36 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 0°06'18 11 WEST, 210.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'42 11 EAST, 237.57 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 470 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°03'42", A DISTANCE OF 295.82 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 53°50'00 11 EAST, 386.84 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 35°24'00" WEST, 30.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63°42'00 11 EAST, 424.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76°40'00" EAST, 2 8 8 . 3 0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH O O 0 0 0 ' 0 0 " WEST, 81 . 0 0 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 7 2 ° 4 9' 0 0" WEST, 2 8 8 . 6 0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8 9 ° 3 2' 3 0" WEST, 6 2 8 . 0 0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°08'00" WEST, 618.80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°36'00" WEST, 187.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2°56'00 11 EAST, 166.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20°05'30" EAST, 530.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 .. WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS .. FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10179 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 30 AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE SOUTH 89°43'11" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, A DISTANCE OF 48.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD SURVEY NO. 454, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 31°32'16" WEST 247.14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 89°43'11" EAST, 145.34 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PROPOSED RANCHO SANTA FE DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 12°22'42" WEST, 22.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1137 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUG!I A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°17' 27" A DISTANCE OF 144. 68 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 69°00'00" WEST, 172.47 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE NORTH 31°32'16" EAST, 115.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PAGE 32 , t_• I 659 ORDER NO. 1126324-11 AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-071-09, 223-050-51, 223-050-52, 223-050-53, 223-050-54, 223-050-59, 223-050-65. NOTE: THIS PARCEL IS DESCRIBED IN A MANNER NOT NORMALLY USED BY TITLE INSURERS, AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR CUSTOMERS. THEREFORE, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS DESCRIPTION NOT BE INCLUDED IN ~.NY CONVEYANCES, AS IT IS NOT INSURABLE. PARCEL CC: 7HE WEST EALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-011-02, 223-011-03, 223-032-01 AND 223-032-02. PARCEL DD: THOSE PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THE S~l'J DIEGO COUNT~ ASSESSOR'S MAPS BEING PARCELS 223-011-4, 223-011-5, 223-011-6, 223- 021-8 AND 223-011-11 LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF PARCEL M.AP NO. 10179, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF Sll..N DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 1 7, 19 8 0 AS FILE NO. 80-204502 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED "NOT A PART" ON SAID PARCEL MAP. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 79-25(B) UNIT NO. l, IN THE CITY OF CARLSB~.D. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 10243, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 20, 1981. A.LSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 79-25(8) PHASE VI, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 10820, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JANUARY 13, 1984, AND CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 84-23, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. Jl241, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 22, 1985. PAGE 33 660 ORDER NO. 1126324-11 ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 9182, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 28, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82-332144 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. Al,SO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. ·101 79 LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF THAT CERTAIN RIGHT OF WAY AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE COUNTY, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 7, 1966 AS FILE NO. 58549 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA COSTA MEADOWS, UNIT NO. 2, ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 6095 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF EL FUERTE STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 6905; THENCE NORTH 68°13' 07'' EAST 1536. 70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 68°01'10" EAST 99.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 51°54'40" EAST 141.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22°52'25" WEST 191.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°13'00" WEST 73.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83°46'00" WEST 185. 97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 ° 25' 48" WEST 144. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55°34' 12" EAST 100. 00 FEET TO THE BEGI:NrHNG OF A TANGENT 322-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33°35'22 11 A DISTANCE OF 188.77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-011-04, 223-011-05, 223-011-06; 223-021-08, 223-021-11. NOTE: THIS PARCEL IS DESCRIBED IN A MANNER NOT NORMALLY USED BY TITLE INSURERS, AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR CUSTOMERS. THEREFORE, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS DESCRIPTION NOT BE INCLUDED IN ANY CONVEYANCES, AS IT IS. NOT INSURABLE. PAGE 34 LEGAL DESCRIPTION RJcN.C,l:ti3 F--05 . ORDER NO. 1126322-ll THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THOSE PARCELS OF LP...ND SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ASSESSOR'S MAPS BEING 223-050-43, 223-050-49 A.ND 223-010-31 A.ND LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: P.J:,,.RCEL BB: THAT PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 3 2; Jl..ND THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 31; .l:,,.ND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUJ..RTER OF SECTION 30, ALL BEING IN TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST; TOGETHER WITH THE NORTHEAST QUP..RTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3 6, IN TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLJ:..T THEREOF DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID WEST nALF; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'42" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SP.ID WEST HALF, 2689.53 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 0 0 O 3 6' 3 8" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST P.ALF, 3120.35 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY -'· RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 200.00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC EASEMEN7, RECORDED APRIL i9, 1954 IN BOOK 5208, PAGE 399 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE AND ALONG SAID EASEMENT LINE, NORTH 64°13'23" WEST, 2226.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°08'00" WEST, 65.20 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE, SAID LINE BEING 45.00 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES AND PARJl.LLEL WITH SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF A 200. 00 FOOT SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE NORTH 64 ° 13' 23" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, 1583.36 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LA COSTA VALE UNIT NO. 3, IN THE CITY OF CARLSB~.D, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7950, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 3, 1974; THENCE NORTH 31°00'00" EAST ALONG S.ZUD BOUNDARY LINE, 45.19 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID MAP NO . 7 9 5 0 ; THENCE NORTH 6 4 ° 13' 2 3" WEST ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID MAP NO. 7950, A DISTANCE OF 1326.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43°30'00" WEST 477.59 FEET TO THE BEGINN.:IJ',TG OF A NON-TANGENT 1720.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 43°30 1 00 11 WEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°50'00 11 A DIST~.NCE OF 85.06 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTh 43°40' WEST 445 .15 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 455. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, WESTERLY .~ .. ND SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 96°50'00" A DISTANCE OF 768.98 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 39°30'00" WEST 153.51 PAGE 27 662 ORDER NO. 1126322-11 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 780.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 08°59' 38" A DISTANCE OF 122 .44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 72-20, UNIT NO. 2, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7779, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 26, 1973; THENCE LEAVING SAID MAP NO. 7950 AND ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 7779, NON-TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 71°00'00" WEST 269.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44°00'00" WEST 965.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71°13'23 11 WEST 276.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 77°46'50" WEST 290. 25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 59 °SO' 00" WEST 121. 23 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83°40'00 11 WEST 114.59 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14°40'00" WEST 230.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28°20'30 11 WEST 43 6. 00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18 °27' 30" EAST 218. 11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 25 ° 03' 28" WEST 165. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 64°56'32" WEST 300.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°24'13 11 WEST 110.03 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 100.00 FOOT EASEMENT TO SA.N DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 19, 1954 IN BOOK 5208, PAGE 403 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP · NO. 7779 P.ND ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID EASEMENT NORTH 6 4 ° S 6' 3 2" WEST TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF CARLSBAD TRACT NO .. 7 5 -4 (LA COSTA ESTATES NORTH), IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 8302, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 5, 1976; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF NORTH 25 °03, 28 II EAST 100. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03 ° 02 I 10 II WEST 495. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 20°25'10" EAST 280.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 05°30'00" WEST 13 0. 00 FEET; .THENCE NORTH 3 6 ° S S' 10" EAST 345. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 52°15'00 11 EAST 160.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE BOUNDARY OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10179, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBP.D, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 27, 1980 AS FILE NO. 80-204502 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE LEAVING SAID BOUNDARY OF MAP NO. 8302 AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 10179, SOUTH 26°58'00" EAST 346.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°43'11" EAST 880.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42°13'10" EAST 281.25 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49°46'54" EAST 170.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 42°42'30" EAST 530.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66°24'35" EAST 174.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 ° 58, 20 II EAST 145. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34 °29' 10 II EAST 309. so FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74°00'21" EAST 145.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41°27'00" EAST 113.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85°44'40" EAST 271.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31°57'15" EAST 330.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°25'05" EAST 129.10 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY THEREOF NORTH 89°43'11" EAST 2607.74 FEET TO T·IE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF SECTION 25 TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF LYING SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEASTERLX BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 8302. PAGE 28 663 ORDER NO. 1126322-11 EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 3 2, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTH 0°36'31" WEST, 950.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31°28'50" WEST, 341.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58°42'49" WEST, 456.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76°12'27" WEST 230.37 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 0°36'31 11 EAST, 77.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°23'29" WEST, 350.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°36'31 11 WEST, 265.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 46°28'07" EAST, 68.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 55 ° 28' 26" EAST 34. 95 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 ° 10' 26 11 EAST, 76. 69 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 ° 23' 29 11 EAST, 110. 00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 78°04'47 11 EAST, 92.20 FEET TO A LINE WHICH BEARS SOUTH 0°36'31" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE, NORTH 0°36' 31" EAST, 263.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHERLY HALF OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, .RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF SOUTH 89°53'42" EAST 496.36 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NOR'IH L.INE .SOUTH 0°06'18 11 WEST, 210.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89°53'42" EAST, 237.57 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 4 70 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY;.. THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE.THROUGH A CENTRAL Jl..NGLE OF 36°03'42", A DISTANCE OF 295.82 FEET;, THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 53°50'00 11 EAST, 386.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 35°24'00" WEST, 30.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63°42'00" EAST, 424.18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76°40'00 11 EAST, 288.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH.00°.00'00" WEST, 81.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 72°49'00" WEST, 288.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°32'30" WEST, 628.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 87°08'00" WEST, -618 ._80 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47°36' 00" WEST, 187. 00 FEET; THENCE NO,RTH 2 ° 5 6 ' 0 0 " EAST, 16 6 . 2 0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2 0 ° 0 S ' 3 0" ·EAST, 5 3 0 . 3 7 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PAGE 29 664 ORDER NO. 1126322-11 COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 10179 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF S~.N DIEGO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 30 AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP; THENCE SOUTH 89°43'11" WEST Ji.LONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, A DISTANCE OF 48.19 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ROAD SURVEY NO. 454, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LINE AND ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 31°32'16" WEST 247.14 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 89 °43' 11" EAST, 145. 34 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PROPOSED RANCHO SANTA FE DRIVE; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 12°22'42" WEST, 22.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 11~7 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°17'27" A DISTANCE OF 144.68 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 69°00'00" WEST, 172.47 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE NORTH 31°32'16" EAST, 115.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-050-43, 223-050-49, 223-010-31 . ..............-NbTE: THIS PARCEL IS DESCRIBED IN A MA..'l'-JNER NOT NOR.M.ri.LLY USED BY TITLE INSURERS, AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR CUSTOMERS. THEREFORE, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS DESCRIPTION NOT BE INCLUDED IN ANY CONVEY~.NCES, AS IT IS NOT ~' INSURABLE . ~. l THOSE PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO i ASSESSOR'S MAPS BEING 223-010-12. 223-010-18, 223-010-19, 223-010-27, ; .. ! 223-010-28, 223-010-29, 223-010-32, 223-010-33, 223-010-34, 223-010-35, \ 223-010-37, 223-021-9, 223-021-10, 223-021-12, 223-021-15, 223-021-16, · 222-470-23 AND 222-470-25 AND LYING WITH THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED \PROPERTY: \ PARCEL DD: PARCELS 3 AND 4 OF P~..RCEL MAP NO. 10179, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 17, 1980 AS FILE NO. 80-204502 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED "NOT A PART" ON SAID PARCEL MAP. ~XCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 79-25(B) UNIT NO. 1, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 10243, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 20, 1981. PAGE 30 665 ORDER NO. 1126322-11 ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS LYING WITHIN CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 79-25(B) PHASE VI, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 10820, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JANUARY 13, 1984, .AND CARLSBAD TRACT NO. 84-23, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 11241, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SJi...N DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 22, 1985. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING WITHIN RECORD OF SURVEY NO. 9182, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, OCTOBER 28, 1982 AS FILE NO. 82-332144 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 10179 LYING NORTHEASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF THAT CERTAIN RIGHT OF WAY AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE COUNTY, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SJi..N DIEGO COUNTY, APRIL 7, 1966 AS FILE NO. 58549 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LA COSTA MEADOWS, UNIT NO. 2, ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 6095 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY l RIGHT-OF~WAY OF EL FUERTE STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 6905; THENCE NORTH 68°13'07" EAST 1536.70 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ·-soUTH 68 ° 01, 10" EAST 99. s1 FEET: THENCE soUTH 51 ° 54, 40 11 EAST 141. 03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 22°52'25" WEST 191.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 57°13'00" WEST 73.07 FEET; THENCE NORTH 83°46'00" WEST 185.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 34°25'48" WEST 144.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55°34'12" EAST 100.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 322-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 33 ° 35' 22" ·A DISTANCE OF 188. 77 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 223-010-12, 223-010-18, 223-010-19, 223-010-27, 223- 010-28, 223-010-29, 223-010-32, 223-010-33, 223-010-34, 223-010-35, 223- 010-37; 223-021-09, 223-021-10, 223-021-12, 223-021-15 AND 223-021-16; 222-470-25 AND 222-470-23. NOTE: THIS PARCEL IS DESCRIBED IN A MANNER NOT NORMALLY USED BY TITLE INSURERS, AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR CUSTOMERS. THEREFORE, IT IS IMPORTANT THAT THIS DESCRIPTION NOT BE INCLUDED IN ANY CONVEYANCES, AS IT IS NOT INSURABLE. PAGE 31 666 ORDER NO. 1126322-11 PARCEL EE: PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13900, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 6, 1985 AS FILE NO. 85-281626 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL NO. 222-151-80. PAGE 32 ORDER NO. 1126323-11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:. PARCEL A: PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 1188, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 20, 1972 AS FILE NO. 340334 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS PARCEL "A" IN DEED TO LA COSTA LAND COMPANY, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1973 AS FILE NO. 73-245058 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID LAND BEING THAT.PORTION DELINEATED AND DESIGNATED AS "NOT A PART OF THIS MAP" ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 1188. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF ALGA ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD RECORDED DECEMBER 9, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83-449259 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13427, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CO'CJ!ITY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 16, 1984 AS FILE NO. 84-031333 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 213-030-11, 215-021-07, 215-030-06, 215-030-14, 215-031-08, 215-052-15 AND 215-061-01, 09. PARCEL A-1: AN EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY OVER, UNDER, ALONG AND ACROSS THAT PORTION OF PARCEL A OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13427, IN THE CITY OF .CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 16, 1984 AS FILE NO. 84-031333 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, FOR THE PURPOSES SET OUT IN THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1985 AS FILE NO. 85-335690 AND RE-RECORDED FEBRUARY 28, 1986 AS FILE NO. 86-078338, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: T:11/16/9S 12:02:38 V: I I JL 00 PAGE 26 668 ORDER NO. 1126323-11 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL A, SAID POINT BEING ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT GRANTED TO THE CITY OF C~.RLSBAD, DECEMBER 9, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83-449259 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 13427; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL A, THE FOLLOWING COURSES: NORTH 5 ° 12 ' 0 3 " EAST, 4 0 9 . 16 FEET, TO THE BEG INNING OF A TANGENT 1,000.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21°15'34" A DISTANCE OF 371.05 FEET; THENCE NORTH 16°03'31" WEST, 243.88 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 300.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SO'CJTEEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°17'29" A DISTANCE OF 237.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29°13'58" EAST, 60.63 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 800.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2 6 ° 3 4' 3 6" A DISTANCE OF 371.08 FEET; THENCE NORTH 2°39'22" EAST, 311.48 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 600.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 ° 3 6' 09" A DISTANCE OF 163. 3 9 'FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°56'47" WEST, 56.41 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 600.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 19°48'26" A DISTANCE OF 207. 42 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 450. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 44°43'38" A DISTANCE OF 351.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 37°51'59" WEST, 263.43 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 400. 00 FOOT RADIUS_ CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°24'50" A DISTANCE OF 254.22 FEET; THENCE NORTH 74°16'49" WEST, 495.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 33°21'02" WEST, 99.22 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE SOUTH 74°16'49" EAST, 516.83 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 450. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY .. ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°24'5011 A DISTANCE OF 285.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 37°51' 5 9" EAST, 315 .-a 2 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 480.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°16'12" A DISTANCE OF 287.10 FEET; ·THENCE SOUTH 03°35'47 11 EAST, 281.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 5°49'18 11 EAST, 228.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 8°22'00" WEST, 100.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2°39'22" WEST, 211.48 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 825.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°34'36" A DISTANCE OF 382.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29°13'58" WEST, 60.63 FEET,. TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 275.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45°17'29" A DISTANCE OF 217.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16 °03' 31" EAST, 243. 88 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT l, 025. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 21°15'34" A DISTANCE OF 380.32 PAGE 27 669 ORDER NO. 1126323-11 FEET; THENCE SOUTH S O 12' 03 11 WEST, 407. 20 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID DOCUMENT; THENCE NORTH 89°16' 23 11 WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE THEREOF 25.08 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 12 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, S~ATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 57 OF LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT NO. 1, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 6800, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 9, 1970; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID UNIT NO. 1 AS FOLLOWS: SOUTH 60°37'21" EAST, 549.65 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF ALGA ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 6800, BEING A POINT IN THE ARC OF A 949 FOOT RADIUS CURVE~ CONCAVE NORTHERLY A RADIAL BEARS SOUTH 42°42' 0111 EAST TO SAID POINT, WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 32°40'34" A DISTANCE OF 541.22 FEET, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 79°58'33 11 WEST, 670 FEET TO A TANGENT 949 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 25°54'00 11 A DISTANCE OF 428.99 FEET AND SOUTH 15°52'33" WEST SO FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LA COSTA VALLEY UNIT NO. 4, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 5781, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 5781 AS FOLLOWS: WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A 999 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 23°22'00 11 A DISTANCE OF 407.42 FEET, TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 50°44' 00" WEST, 398 FEET TO A TANGENT l, 001 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE, THROUGH AN ANGLE OF 38°30'58 11 A DISTANCE OF 672.91 FEET, NORTH 89°14'58" WEST, 98.00 FEET AND NORTH 0°45'02 11 EAST, 17.00 FEET TO-~THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH ONE-HALF OF SECTION 26; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89°14' 58" EAST, 161.14 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 25; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 25 SOUTH 89°12'29" EAST, 2,321.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THAT PORTION OF ALGA ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN DEED TO THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, RECORDED DECEMBER 9, 1983 AS FILE NO. 83-449259 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AFFECTS PARCEL NOS. 215-480-02 AND 215-480-03. PAGE 28 L' Pl-H 0~T RBVvlV10vt1 fc:0RCet:RDER LEGAL DESCRIPTION L--evOJVVfe,, 670 - NO. 1126305-11. THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL J: THAT PORTION OF LOT 249 OF LA COSTA VALE UNIT NO. 1, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7457, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CENTELLA STREET AS SHOWN ON MAP NO. 7457, SAID POINT BEING ON THE A.RC OF A 730.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 84°17'15" EAST, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP NO. 7457; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°40'42" A DISTANCE OF 46. 87 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF--BEGINNING, A RADIAL TO SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEARS NORTH 80°36' 33" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF CENTELLA STREET, THE SOUTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LEVANTE STREET, THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LA COSTA AVENUE AND THE NORTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RANCHO SANTA FE ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 7457, THE FOLLOWING COURSES: THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°36'33" A DISTANCE OF 211.62 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY WITH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88°36'09"; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 30.93 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A 2030. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°36'0911 A DISTANCE OF 127.64 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE NORTH 59°00'00" EAST, 366.99 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 20.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 86°40'29" A DISTANCE OF 30.26 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A 842. DO FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16°50'26" A DISTANCE OF 247.48 FEET TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A 20. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00", A DISTANCE OF 31.42 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 38°50'03" WEST, 311.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1551. 00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF T:ll/15/95 16:10:51 V: / / LB oo PAGE 6 .I _) 671 ORDER NO. 1126305-li 2°30'04" A DISTANCE OF 67.71 FEET TO A POINT, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 53°40'01" WEST; THENCE LEAVING SAID CURVE NORTH 84°17'50" WEST, 332.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AFFECTS PARCEL NO. 223-170-33 . PAGE 7 ORDER NO. 1114479-11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION U u lOIBN [() cSf - THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOTS 518 THROUGH 521, INCLUSIVE AND 523 OF LA COSTA MEADOWS UNIT NO. 3, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 7076, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO, OCTOBER 6, 1971. T:l0/26/95 08:50:18 V: / / MF 00 PAGE 7 f3'clt(Btt R<3W1V1clvtT" fORCEL-S 673 ORDER NO. 1114480-11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~ Ceot-~Ave, THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOTS 9 AND 10 OF LA COSTA GREENS, IN THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 6708, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, AUGUST 18, 1970. PAGE 8 "EXHIBIT C" Schedule of Parkland Credits 674 Villages of La Costa Existing Park.land Credits are 13.841 acres as of the effective date of 1996 Parks Agreement. 17 EXHIBIT "D" VILLAGES OF LA COSTA EXISTING PARKLAND CREDITS ASSIGNMENT NOTICE 675 TIIlS NOTICE IS PROVIDED TO CITY PURSUANT TO SECTION7-.1 ofthe 1996 PARKS AGREEMENT To: Community Development Director City of Carlsbad Date: 2075 Las Palmas Drive Carlsbad, CA 92009-4859 Property Transferred: ___ [~d~escn~·*pt~io~n~] ________________ _ New Owner: __________________________ _ 1 Real Estate Collateral Management Company hereby notifies the City that the above-described property has been transferred to the new owner indicated above. As part of that transfer, the following 1996 Parks Agreement credits and/or reimbursements have been assigned, or not, assigned as indicated: Credits: __ [P~e.c2s~cn,.!!·b~e~cr::ce~dwit:>!.s,....!oa.r...!difunl!!lo~n~e,uin!!ls!!=ertu_"N~or.!.!nei.:.."..J.l ___________ _ Reimbursements: __ ..&,:[D~esc!:ll!.!rib!Ce11::-rue~im~b~u~rse~m~e~nt~s,-..:o.er-!:if!l..in~o~n~e,-..1ins~e~rt._"~No~ne=-"..J.J _____ _ The City is entitled to rely on this Notice. REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY/VILLAGES OF LACOSTA By: _____________ _ Name: ·-------------Title:. ____________ _ C:\DMS\ll.Wll\11272S7.0l t.(IST. OVERHEAD TEL. u C: en -C: 0 -:5 en C: 0 C..) ~ 0 b c.c a, a, .... LINE (NO RECORD) \IICINllY MAP PARK 32.9 PLU , ACRES li~ ·,.,., ~~ ·,., ·,. ~, t.'A.'l '·,.,.,., .. ·, A PART AICE. A P .M. NO. 13~27 102' ROAD ESMT. TO CITY OF CARLSBAD EASEMENT DEDICATION ~c.QUESTED BY: THE FIELDSTONE COMPANY 5465 MOREHOUSE DR.,STE.250 _--,1.1.:.....;....__,~ _ __,......../-I._ SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 PHONE: 619 546-8081 P.N. O'OAY R.C.E. f 27214 f"•\JOBS\911027\9127P4 12-2-96 3•18:33 pr1 E:ST Xrefs: NONE 676 PAR. 1 P.M. noo EXIST. 10' S.M.C.W.O. SEWER ESMT . (NO RECORD) EXIST. 20' S.M.C.W.D. SEWER ESMT. o· 500' -------- SCALE: 1· = 500' A.P .N. 213-030-11 A.P.N. 215-021-07 A.P.N. 215-030-06, 14 A.P.N. 215-031-08 A.P.N. 215-052-15 A.P.N. 215-061-01, 09 A.P.N. 215-480-02. 03 SHT. 1 OF 2 SHTS. A.P.N. SEE ABOVE DATE 8-2-93 cJ .5 i 0 -:i rn -C 0 (.) ~ Q 0 cc 0) 0) ~ @ NO. b.. OR BEARING Ill D. = 5'57'03" I 2 l N 62'14'44• E 13 N 31'07'51'' W 14 N 44'39'59" W 5 N 59'48'34" W 6 N 51'46'48" W 7 N 12'22'49" W 8 l N 19' 31 '46" E 9 l N 11' 38'23" E 1 Q) N 14'39'41' E 11 l N 28"30'4T W 11 l N 18"49'02" E 113) N 6'55'23" W 14 N 6°24'16" W 115) N 49'48'26" W '16) N 65'38'53" W 17) N 79'24'38" W 11 B) N 62'24'15" W I 19) N 9'18'25" W J {20) N 54' 12'09" E l2U N 3'48'04" E 1!2) N 29' 37' 39" W '3) N 24'07'1T E P4 N 5'48'03" W 125 N 30'23'1 :S' W P6 N 2'52'09" E ) ) N 68"20' 1 Q" W ~i ) N 88"58'07 W 7220 -£.... ON~ S.-204 """"'""' ~--12-~-....... RADIUS LENGTH 1451.00' 150.70' 919.62' 190.26' 84.56' 85.64' 78.5.3' 60.91' 73.47' 142.47' 100.29' 47.47' 31.87' 57.37' 97.04' 51.90' 152.11' 45.79' 39.25' 101.09' 125.32' 50.23' 88.32' 49.46' 55.90' 40.54' 138,01 I 72.94' 43.99' ~~QfESSta NO. b.. OR BEARING (29 N 42'08'22" E (3~ N 8'47'51 E L31 N 22'50'03" W 13:i) N 14'07'19" W '33 N 8'56'01" E '34) N 70'58'01 E 15 N 62°14'24" W 135 N 45'50'59" W :,1> N 68'26'08" W )~ N 83'47'01' W 39 N 66'31 '50" E 40 N 35'28'40" E 41 N 58'26'39" E 14~) N 62' 40'54" W 43 N 4"58'33" E 44 N .3'59'54" W 451 N 18°00'21" W (46) N 31'36'57" W 14~) N 58'44'4T W 14f~ N 76'21'37" E 49 N 79'26'3T W (50 N 45' 14'24" W 51 N 00'02'21' E l;>~I N 2714'45" W 13 N 00'42'03" E ~4 N 66"21 '36" E ~~I 6 = 14'42'11" 6) N 81"03'47" E (51) 6 = 12"52'00" llt-lJl-:rn» Sur,,opw,f EASEMENT DEDICATION I , ... QUESTED BY: THE FIELDSTONE COMPANY 5465 MOREHOUSE DR.,STE.250 ---------...--SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 PHONE: 619 546-8081 F":\JOBS\911027\9127P4 12-2-96 11:34:43 aM EST Xrefs: NONE 677 RADIUS LENGTH 60.5.J' 52.0.3' 128.16' 88.77' 96.23' 6.132' 52.93' 60.55' 70.98' 95.52' 56.81' 76.B6' 49.03' 402.09' 451.51' 2.38.54' 142.78' 231.48' 268.6.3' 31.04' 28.56' 52.89' 45.80' 90.81' 636.19' 1657.65' 1349.00' 346.17' 177.97' 1451.00' 325.84' A.P.N. 213-030-11 A.P .N. 215-021-07 A.P.N. 215-030-06, 14 A.P.N. 215-031-08 A.P.N. 215-052-75 A.P.N. 215-061-01, 09 A.P .N. 215-480-02, 03 SHT. 2 OF 2 SHTS. A.P.N. SEE ABOVE DATE 8-2-93 } At,GA-~0~16 ft\~KA~ LEGAL DESCRlPTION: 678 91-1027-3 8-5-93 PARK A PORTION OF PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL MAP NUMBER 1188, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, DECEMBER 20, 1972 AS FILE NUMBER 340334 MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 3; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 3, SOUTH 0° 42' 03" WEST, 636.19 FEET; TIIENCE LEA YING SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 66° 21' 36" WEST, 1657.65 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1349.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG SAID CURVE THRqUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14° 42' 11" A DISTANCE OF 346.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81 ° 03' 47" WEST, 177.97 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 1451.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWEST ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12 ° 52' 00" A DISTANCE OF 325.84 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, FROM SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTINUING SOUTHWEST ALONG SAID 1451.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5° 57' 03'' A DISTANCE OF 150.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62° 14' 44" WEST, 919.62 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31° 07' 51" WEST, 190.26 FEET; THENCE NORTH 44° 39' 59" WEST, 84.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 59° 48' 34" WEST, 85.64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51 ° 46' 48" WEST, 78.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12° 22' 49" WEST, 60.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 19° 31' 46" EAST, 73.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 ° 38' 23" EAST, 142.47 FEET; THENCE NORTII 14° 39' 47" EAST, 100.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH 28° 30' 47" WEST, 47.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18° 49' 02" EAST, 31.87 FEET; TIIENCE NORTH 06° 55' 23" WEST, 57.37 FEET; TIIENCE NORTH 06° 24' 16" WEST, 97.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 49° 48' 26" WEST, 51.90 FEET; TIIENCE NORTH 65° 38' 53" WEST, 152.11 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79° 24' 38" WEST, 45.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62° 24' 15" WEST, 39.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 09° 18' 25" WEST, 101.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 54° 12' 09" EAST, 125.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 03° 48' 04" EAST, 50.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 29° 37' 39" WEST, 88.32 FEET; THENCE NORTH 24° 07' 17'' EAST, 49.46 FEET; TIIENCE NORTH 05° 48' 03" WEST, 55.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 30° 23" 13" WEST, 40.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02° 52' 09" EAST, 138.01 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68° 20' 10" EAST, 72.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88° 58' 07" EAST, 43.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 42° 08' 22" EAST, 60.53 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08° 47' 57'' EAST, 52.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 22° 50' 03" WEST, 128.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14° 07' 19" WEST, 88.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH 08° 56' 01" EAST, 96.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 58' 07'' EAST, 63.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62° 14' 24" EAST, 52.93 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45° 50' 59" EAST, 60.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68° 26' 08" EAST, 70.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83° 47' 07" EAST, 95.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 66° 31' 50" EAST, 56.81 FEET; THENCE NORTH 35° 28' 40" EAST, 76.86 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58° 26' 39" EAST, 49.03 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 62° 40' 54" EAST, 402.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04° 58' 33" WEST, 451.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03° 59' 54" EAST, 238.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 18° 00" 21" EAST, 142.78 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31 ° 36' 57" EAST, 231.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58° 44' 47" EAST, 268.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76° 21' 37" EAST, 31.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 79° 26' 37" EAST, 28.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45° 14' 24" EAST, 52.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00° 02' 27" WEST, 45.80 FEET; 679 THENCE SOUTH 27° 14' 45" EAST, 90.81 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "G" RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: r Name: City Clerk City of Carlsbad 1 Street Address: City & State: 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive Carlsbad, CA 92008 L J MAll. TAX STATEMENTS TO: EXEMPT SPACE ABOVE nns LINE FOR RECORDERS USE Documcmary transfer tax is $....:2:,_ [X} Computed on full value of property convey=l. or [ ] Computed oo full value less value of liens and encumbrances remaining at time of sale or transfer. [] Unincorporated area or [X] City of Carlsbad; and IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE REAL PROPERTY FOR ALGA NORTE PARK ProjectNo.lNAME: ________ _ APN 680 REAL ESTATE COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter designated Grantor, represents that they are the owners of the hereinafter descnbed real property, and for a valuable consideration, hereby makes an IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATION to the CITY OF CARLSBAD, a Municipal corporation, hereinafter designated Grantee, its successors and assigns, for the future Alga Norte Public Park upon, through, under, over .and across the hereinafter described real property for the following purpose: ALGA NOR.TE PUBUC PARK the real property referred to above is situated in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California and is descnbed in Exhibit "A" consisting of ____ page(s), attached hereto and made a part hereof. Exhibit "B" consisting of ___ page(s) is attached for clarity only. 681 This Offer ofDedication is made pursuant to Section 7050 of the Government Code of the State of California and may only be accepted by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad mr that ponien f.er wbiek a. road eoraru;tie11 i:eRRiil't bu been &Vt'&fdee. :Accep.1aoce may be concun:eat er Sl:lb&equent t~tlie awH£i of tac eenstr:uctioA c:ontr:act for eac:b. _portien efthe road. This Offer ofDedication shall be irrevocable and shall be binding on the Grantor. its heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this Irrevocable Of(er of Dedication to be executed this_ day of ______ 199 _. Real Estate Collateral Management Company, a Delaware cprporation, as Owner By. _______________ _ (Signature) Name: ____________ _ (Type or Print) Title: ____________ _ (Type or Print) By: ______________ _ (Signature) Name: ____________ _ (Type or Print) Title: ____________ _ (Type or Print) 2 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 A-4 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS June, 2000 XIX-6 LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE10 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS May 16, 2001 Prepared by: ENGINEERS 1565 Hotel Circle South, Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 299-3090 June 12, 2000 Revised October 19, 2000 Revised November 20, 2000 Revised December 28, 2000 Revised April 12, 2001 Revised May 16, 2001 JPK/JR 3-970723 LINSCOTT LA\\I & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS XI. CIRCULATION A. PERFORMANCESTANDARD No road segment or intersection in the Zone or any road segment or intersection out of the Zone, which is impacted by development in the Zone, shall be projected to exceed a Service Level C during neither off-peak hours, nor Service Level D during peak hours. Impacted means where twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by the Local Facilities Management Zone will use the road segment or intersection. B. FACILITY PLANNING AND ADEQUACY ANALYSIS The purpose of the analysis is to determine whether or not the circulation system within Zone 1 O conforms to the adopted performance standards. It will also address all Circulation Element road segments and intersections outside of Zone 10 impacted by twenty percent or more of the traffic generated by Zone 10 to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard. This section is based on the Circulation Analysis for Local Facilities Management Zone 10 prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan (LLG}. The report analyzes existing, 2005, 2010 and city buildout conditions (2020). Assumptions were made in the traffic report as to the location of residential development in each phase. These assumptions were provided to the traffic engineer by the City of Carlsbad and the property owners of Zone 10. Based on these yearly projections, the phasing of Circulation Element roadways located within Zone 10 are identified. The location of proposed development within each phase is for planning purposes only. The actual location and phasing of development may affect the timing for provision of Circulation Element roadways within Zone 10. The financial guarantee for the proposed circulation element roadways will be provided; however, the construction of the facility may not occur until the development requiring the need for roadways are constructed. In the event it is determined that circulation facilities need to be accelerated or delayed as a result of changes in the location and/or timing of land use development, the timing of the required roadway improvements may· be modified without amendment to this plan. However, any deletions or additions to the list of improvements anticipated herein will require amending this plan. _,_ LINSCOTT LA\N & GREENSP1\N ENGINEERS 1. INVENTORY a. Circulation Element Roads Within Zone 1 O b. There are four circulation roadways located within or adjacent to Zone 10. Poinsettia Lane and Alicante Road are located within the boundaries of Zone 10, while El Camino Real and Alga Road are outside but adjacent to the Zone. El Camino Real is designated as a six-lane prime arterial. Poinsettia Lane and Alga Road are designated as four-lane major arterials. Alicante Road is designated as a two-lane collector. Identification of Impacted Road Segments and Intersections As stated in the performance standard, impacted road segments and intersections are those that have 20% or more of the Zone 1 O traffic using them. It is possible that certain road segments or intersections will not be analyzed for each study year since the construction of additional road segments may decrease the distribution on a road segment below the 20% distribution threshold from a previous study year. Zone 10 distribution is determined by a Select Zone Assignment (SZA) from the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Buildout 2020 Cities/County and Carlsbad Subarea Model. Figures 1, 2 and 3 (following the text and tables) show the estimated percentage of Zone 10 traffic on the roadway system for Years 2005, 2010 and buildout conditions. The road segments and intersections that are impacted by 20% of Zone 10 traffic are listed below. These facilities were evaluated to determine the geometry necessary to meet the Level of Service performance standards. The intersection numbers are the same as in the Villages of La Costa EIR, explaining the nonsequential order. -2- LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS Road Segments El Camino Real: s/o Alga Road Poinsettia Lane: El Camino Real to El Fuerte Street Alga Road: El Camino Real to Alicante Road Alicante Road: School Site to Alga Road Intersections 7. El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane Classification Six-lane Prime Four-lane Major Four-lane Major Two-lane Collector 8. El Camino Real/Aviara Parkway/Alga Road 39. Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Road 40. Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street 41 . Alga Road/ Alicante Road -3- LINSCOTf L/\W & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 2. PHASING The traffic analysis prepared by LLG is a detailed study dealing with the specific traffic generated from within the boundaries of Zone 1 O. This study analyzes the impacts of traffic on existing and proposed road segments and intersections impacted by Zone 10. The report also proposes a mitigation plan to ensure conformance with the adopted performance standard through buildout. The traffic analysis uses the proposed roadway system and intersection geometrics for existing conditions and Years 2005, 2010 and 2020 conditions as outlined by the City of Carlsbad. The time increments are used more as benchmarks than actual completion dates. If a future traffic analysis indicates that the timing of the necessary improvements needs to be accelerated or the timing is premature, the required improvements must also be adjusted to guarantee that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. Existing conditions were determined by performing peak hour counts at study intersections. Years 2005, 2010 and 2020 were evaluated using data developed from the SANDAG/Buildout 2020 Cities/County and Carlsbad Subarea computer traffic forecast model. The street segment classifications show the peak hour volume per lane of the street segment, the existing peak hour volume to capacity (V/C) ratio and the street segment Level of Service (LOS) without mitigation and with mitigation. The peak hour capacity per lane is assumed as 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane (VPHPL) for the City Surface streets. The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate impacted road segments and intersections serving Zone 10 and propose a mitigation plan if these facilities are determined to operate below the adopted performance standard. The phasing of development and analysis of traffic impacts will be monitored on an annual basis. However, for the purpose of this study, the timing of the necessary improvements will be presented in the following increments: • Improvements needed now • l"mprovements needed prior to 2005 • Improvements needed prior to 2010 • Improvements needed prior to 13uildout (2020) -4- LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS The phasing schedule noted above shall not limit needed traffic improvements to the years mentioned. If a future traffic analysis indicates that the timing of the necessary improvements has changed, the required improvements shall also be adjusted either earlier or later to guarantee that conformance with the adopted performance standard will be maintained. C. ADEQUACY FINDINGS This section will analyze the existing and proposed intersections and road segments affected by the traffic generated from Zone 10. The intersections were analyzed using an Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology. The calculation sheets are contained in Appendix A. The street segments were analyzed using the 1997 Highway Capacity Methodology to determine the operational Level of Service. The performance standard determines that during peak hour a Level of Service A through D as acceptable and a Level of Service of E or worse to be unacceptable. If a facility does not meet the standard, a mitigation program must be prepared so that the facility will operate at an acceptable Level of Service. The proposed mitigation program will be discussed more thoroughly later in this report. Traffic conditions for existing, 2005, 2010 and 2020 are described below. The Level of Service for impacted roadways and intersections are indicated and, if needed, recommended circulation improvement needs are identified. 1. ANALYSIS OF EXISTING CIRCULATION CONDITONS a. Existing Conditions. Traffic Volumes and Capacity The existing circulation element is shown in Figure 4. Existing daily traffic volumes are shown in Table 1. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at an unacceptable LOS, as shown in Table 2. Existing peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 5. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at an unacceptable LOS as shown in Table 3. -5- LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 2. ANALYSIS OF 2005 CIRCULATION CONDITIONS a. 2005 Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2005 is shown in Figure 6. The trip generation for Zone 10 is shown in Table 4. Zone 10 is calculated to generate about 10,980 ADT (5,490 in and 5,490 out), with 420 inbound and 645 outbound trips during the AM peak hour and 700 inbound and 440 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. There is a slight difference between the calculated trip generation from Table 4 and a cordon summary of the trip generation assignment from Figure 8. This is due to an internal capture rate of about 15%. Internal capture refers to trips that stay within the Zone. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at an unacceptable LOS, as shown in Table 5; however, several intersections were identified for mitigation in Figure 15. These mitigations represent new intersections. Peak hour volumes for 2005 are shown in Figure 7. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Table 6. The ADT volumes for 2005 are shown in Figure 8. 3. ANALYSIS OF 2010 CIRCULATION CONDITONS a. 2010 Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2010 is shown in Figure 9. Trip generation for Zone 10 is shown in Table 7. Zone 10 is calculated to generate about 14,910 ADT (7,455 in and 7,455 out), with 575 inbound and 835 outbound trips during the AM peak hour and 945 inbound and 605 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. There is a slight difference between the calculated trip generation from Table 7 and a cordon summary of the trip generation assignment from Figure 11. This is due to an internal capture rate of about 7%. Internal capture refers to trips that stay within the Zone. -6- LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS's as shown in Table 8, assuming the 2005 improvements are in place. The 201 0 peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 1 O. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS as shown in Table 9. The ADT volumes for 201 O are shown in Figure 11. 4. ANALYSIS OF BUILDOUT (2020) CONDITIONS a. Buildout Traffic Volumes and Capacity The circulation element planned for 2020 is shown in Figure 12. Trip generation for Zone 10 is shown in Table 10. Zorie 1 O is calculated to generate about 14,910 ADT (7,455 in and 7,455 out), with 575 inbound and 835 outbound trips during the AM peak hour and 945 inbound and 605 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. There is a slight difference between the calculated trip generation from Table 1 O and a cordon summary for the trip generation assignment from Figure 14. This is due to an internal capture rate of about 5%. Internal capture refers to trips that stay within the Zone. No intersections within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at an unacceptable LOS as shown in Table 11 {assuming the 2010 improvements are in place); however, one intersection was identified for mitigation in Figure 15. This mitigation recommendation is based on a HCM calculation. The 2020 peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 13. No street segments within the 20% criteria area were calculated to operate at unacceptable LOS's as shown in Table 12. The ADT volumes for 2020 are shown in Figure 14. -7- LINSCOTT LAV\/ & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS D. MITIGATION 1. SPECIAL CONDITIONS Prior to the recordation of the first final map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first within Zone 10, a financing program guaranteeing construction of the following circulation improvements shall be approved by the City. With the following improvements, all analyzed intersections and street segments were calculated to operate at acceptable. Levels of Service. a. b. Improvements needed now No mitigation required. Improvements needed by 2005 Poinsettia Lane segment -construct as a four-lane major arterial from El Camino Real to El Fuerte Street. Alicante Road segment -construct as a two-lane collector between the proposed school site and Alga Road. El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane intersection -construct northbound dual left-turn lanes, restripe the northbound number three lane to a combination thru-right turn lane, add a right-turn lane and include a right-turn overlap phase. Construct southbound dual left-turn lanes and restripe the southbound number three lane to a combination thru-right turn lane. Construct the west leg with dual-left turn lanes, two thru lanes and a right-turn lane. Construct the east leg with dual left-turn lanes, a thru lane and a combination thru-right turn lane. Poinsettia Lane/ Alicante Road Intersection -construct a new intersection with a left-turn lane and combination thru-right turn lane for the northbound and southbound approaches. Construct a left-turn lane and two thru-lanes with the number two lane being a combination thru-right turn lane for the east and west legs. -8- LINSCOTT LA\N & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS C. d. e. Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street intersection -construct a new intersection with a left-turn lane and two thru-lanes with the number two lane being a combination thru-right turn lane for each approach leg. Alga Road/ Alicante Road intersection -construct southbound left-turn lane and a combination thru-right turn lane. Restripe the northbound and westbound approaches to a combination thru-right lane. Improvements needed by 2010 Estrella De Mar Road segment -construct as a two-lane local street between Poinsettia Lane and Alga Road. El Fuerte Street segment -build as a two-lane secondary arterial between Palomar Airport Road and Alga Road. Improvements needed by build out (2020) El Camino Real/Alga Road/Aviara Parkway intersection- Provide eastbound to southbound overlap signal phasing. Summary Mitigation to the significantly impacted intersections and street segments are listed on Table 13 and shown graphically in Figure 15. With the previously mentioned improvements, all intersections and road segments are calculated to operate at acceptable Levels of Service to meet the adopted performance standard through buildout. N:\723\Zone IO 2000\Zone 10 LFMP-Circulation.doc N:\723\Zone 10 2000\cover.doc -9- I LINSCOTT Lr\vV & GREENSPr\N ENGINEERS TABLE 1 EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES (ACT'S) ZONE10 STREET SEGMENT DATE 24-HOUR VOLUME (ADT) El Camino Real s/o Alga Road/Aviara Parkway 1999 35,500 Alga Road e/o El Camino Real 1999 9,000 Source: 1999 Traffic Monitoring Program, Valley Research and Planning Associates Zone10 2000/Tab1.723 06/09/00 -10- LIN~CCHT Li\\ \I & C ;R[LNSI\\N ENGINEERS TABLE2 EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE10 INTERSECTION EXISTING 7) El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane 8) El Camino Real/Alga Road/Aviara Parkway 39) Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Road 40) Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street 41)Alga Road/Alicante Road DELAY is measured in seconds. LOS= Level of Service ONE= Does Not Exist ICU DNE 0.42 DNE DNE 0.46 AM LOS ICU -DNE A 0.56 -DNE -DNE A 0.48 1 = El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane -northbound free flow right. 2 = El Camino Real/Alga Road -eastbound right-turn overlap. 3 = El Camino Real/Alga Road -eastbound right-turn lane & right-turn over lap. 0.00 0.61 0.71 0.81 0.91 Zone10 2000/Tab2.723 06/12/00 ICU > to to to to > 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 1.00 LOS A B C D E F -11- PM LOS - A - - A I .... Iv I LANES TABLE 3 EXISTING PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONE10 LANES EACH LINK EACH LINK SEGMENT LOCATION DIRECTION VOLUME DIRECTION VIC LOS DIRECTION VOLUME DIRECTION VIC El Camino Real s/o Alga Road Alga Parkway e/o El Camino Real lo Alicante Road 2 2 2 1302 1149 1167 NB EB EB 0.36 0.32 0.32 Capacity= 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak direction, by direction I.e. northbound, etc. Tab3,6,9, 12.723.xls existing 11/29/00 A A A 2 2 2 1529 SB 0.42 578 WB 0.16 817 WB 0.23 V/C Ranges LOS 0.00-0.60 A 0.61 -0.70 B 0.71-0.80 C 0.81-0.90 D 0.91 -1.00 E > -1.00 F m z 0 z ,., "' V> LOS A A A I .... w I LAND USE SIZE TABLE4 ZONE10 TRAFFIC GENERATION YEAR 2005 DAILY TRIP ENDS AM (ADT) PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN Single Family Residential 570 DU 10/DU 5,700 8% 3:7 140 Multi-Family Residential 180 DU 8/DU 1,440 8% 2:8 20 Light Industrial 2.6AC 80/AC 210 11% 9:1 10 Elementary School 7.2AC 60/AC 430 28% 6:4 70 Active Park 25.8 AC 50/AC 1,290 4% 5:5 25 Community Facilities 5.7 AC 30/AC 170 5% 6:4 5 Day Care 21,780 SF 80/KSF 1,740 17% 5:5 150 TOTAL TRIPS --10,980 --420 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU}, acres (AC) or square feet (SF). 3. All ADTs are rounded to the nearest 10 and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. · Zone10 2000/Tab4.723 05/15/01 OUT 320 90 5 50 25 5 150 645 %OF ADT 10% 10% 12% 7% 4% 8% 18% - PM PEAK HOUR rn z C') z rn "' u, IN:OUT VOLUME SPLIT IN OUT 7:3 400 170 7:3 100 45 2:8 5 20 3:7 10 20 5:5 25 25 5:5 5 5 5:5 155 155 -700 440 I ..... INTERSECTION 7) El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane TABLE 5 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE10 EXISTING AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ONE -ONE - YEAR 2005 AM ICU LOS ICU 0.54 A 0.69 8) El Camino Real/Alga Road/Aviara Parkway 0.42 A 0.56 A 0.71 C 0.75 39) Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Road 40) Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street 41) Alga Road/ Alicante Road DELAY is measured in seconds. LOS = Level of Service ONE= Does Not Exist Zone10 2000/Tab5.723 09/18/00 ONE -ONE ONE -ONE 0.46 A 0.48 -0.45 A 0.58 -0.52 A 0.77 A 0.45 A 0.49 ICU LOS 0.00 > 0.60 A 0.61 to 0. 70 B 0. 71 to 0.80 C 0.81 to 0.90 D 0.91 to 1.00 E > 1.00 F PM LOS B C A C A TABLES m z C1 2005 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONE10 z m LANES LANES m EACH LINK EACH LINK ;,,:, VI SEGMENT LOCATION DIRECTION VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS DIRECTION VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS El Camino Real s/o Alga Road 3 2903 NB 0.54 A 3 2572 SB 0.48 A Alicante Road n/o Pointsettia Lane 1 279 NB 0.16 A 1 448 SB 0.25 A s/o Pointsettia lane 1 39 NB 0.02 A 1 290 SB 0.16 A n/o Alga Road 1 114 NB 0.06 A 1 148 SB 0.08 A Poinsettia Lane e/o El Camino Real 2 804 EB 0.22 A 2 1519 WB 0.42 A I w/o Alicante Road 2 748 EB 0.21 A 2 1573 WB 0.44 A ... u, e/o Alicante Road 2 523 EB 0.15 A 2 1430 WB 0.40 A I w/o El Fuerte Street 2 523 EB 0.15 A 2 1431 WB 0.40 A Alga Parkway e/o El Camino Real 2 1280 EB 0.36 A 2 545 WB 0.15 A w/o Alicante Road 2 1127 EB 0.31 A 2 541 WB 0.15 A Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak direction, by direction I.e. northbound, etc. '1./J;. R51ng~§ LOS 0.00-0.60 A 0.61 -0.70 B 0.71-0.80 C 0.81-0.90 D 0.91 -1.00 E > -1.00 F Tab3,6,9, 12.723.xls 2005 11/29/00 I ..... °' I LAND USE SIZE TABLE7 ZONE10 TRAFFIC GENERATION YEAR 2010 DAILY TRIP ENDS AM (ADT) PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN Single Family Residential 898 DU 10/DU 8,980 8% 3:7 215 Multi-Family Residential 180 DU. 8/DU 1,440 8% 2:8 25 Light Industrial 10.7 AC 80/AC 860 11% 9:1 85 Elementary School 7.2AC 60/AC 430 28% 6:4 70 Active Park 25.8 AC 50/AC 1,290 4% 5:5 25 Community Facilities 5.7 AC 30/AC 170 5% 6:4 5 Day Care 21,780 SF 80/KSF 1,740 17% 5:5 150 TOTAL TRIPS --14,910 --575 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Bnef Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU), acres (AC) or square feet (SF). 3. All ADT's are rounded to the nearest 10 and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. Zone10 2000/Tab7.723 05/16/01 OUT 505 90 10 50 25 5 150 835 PM PEAK HOUR %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN OUT 10% 7:3 630 270 10% 7:3 100 45 12% 2:8 20 85 7% 3:7 10 20 4% 5:5 25 25 8% 5:5 5 5 18% 5:5 155 155 --945 605 I .... ..J I INTERSECTION 7) El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane 8) El Camino Real/Alga Road/Aviara Parkway 39) Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Road 40) Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street 41) Alga Road/Alicante Road DELAY is measured in secoflds. LOS = Level of Service ONE = Does Not Exist Zone10 2000ffab8.723 09/18/00 TABLES SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE10 EXISTING YEAR 2005 AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU ONE -ONE -0.54 A 0.69 0.42 A 0.56 A 0.71 C 0.75 ONE -ONE -0.45 A 0.58 ONE -DNE -0.52 A 0.77 0.46 A 0.48 A 0.45 A 0.49 ICU 0.00 > 0.60 0.61 to 0.70 0.71 to 0.80 0.81 to 0.90 0.91 to 1.00 > 1.00 AM LOS ICU B 0.36 C 0.56 A 0.47 C 0.39 A 0.46 LOS A B C D E F m z C'l z m m "' "' YEAR 2010 LOS ICU A 0.62 A 0.68 A 0.46 A 0.70 A 0.49 PM LOS B B A B A I __. CX> I TABLE 9 2010 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONE10 LANES LANES EACH LINK EACH SEGMENT LOCATION DIRECTION VOLUME DIRECTION VIC LOS DIRECTION Alicante Road n/o Pointsettia Lane 1 252 NB 0.14 A 1 s/o Pointsettia Lane 1 41 NB 0.02 A 1 n/o Alga Road 1 113 NB 0.06 A 1 Poinsettia Lane e/o El Camino Real 2 810 EB 0.23 A 2 lo Alicante Road 2 746 EB 0.21 A 2 Alga Parkway e/o El Camino Real 2 1255 EB 0.35 A 2 w/o Alicante Road 2 1104 EB 0.31 A 2 Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak direction, by direction I.e. northbound, etc. Tab3,6,9, 12.723.xls 2010 11/29/00 m z Cl z m m LINK "' VI VOLUME DIRECTION V/C LOS 415 SB 0.23 A 313 SB 0.17 A 168 SB 0.09 A 1041 WB 0.29 A 1093 WB 0.30 A 566 WB 0.16 A 582 WB 0.16 A VJ<;;_ Ranges LOS 0.00 • 0.60 A 0.61 -0.70 B 0.71-0.80 C 0.81-0.90 D 0.91 • 1.00 E > -1.00 F I .... \0 I LAND USE SIZE TABLE10 ZONE10 TRAFFIC GENERATION YEAR 2020 DAILY TRIP ENDS AM (ADT) PEAK HOUR RATE VOLUME %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN Single Family Residential 898 DU 10/DU 8,980 8% 3:7 215 Multi-Family Residential 180 DU 8/DU 1,440 8% 2:8 25 Light Industrial 10.7 AC 80/AC 860 11% 9:1 85 Elementary School 7.2AC 60/AC 430 28% 6:4 70 Active Park 25.8 AC 50/AC 1,290 4% 5:5 25 Community Facilities 5.7 AC 30/AC 170 5% 6:4 5 Day Care 21,780 SF 80/KSF 1,740 17% 5:5 150 TOTAL TRIPS --14,910 --575 1. Source: Generation rates obtained from SANDAG Brief Generation Guide, July 1998. 2. Rate is a trip end per dwelling unit (DU), acres (AC) or square feet (SF). 3. All ADT's are rounded to the nearest 1 O and peak hours to the nearest 5. 4. Trip ends are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. Zone10 2000/Tab10.723 05/16/01 OUT 505 90 10 50 25 5 150 835 PM PEAK HOUR %OF IN:OUT VOLUME ADT SPLIT IN OUT 10% 7:3 630 270 10% 7:3 100 45 12% 2:8 20 85 7% 3:7 10 20 4% 5:5 25 25 8% 5:5 5 5 18% 5:5 155 155 --945 605 I N 0 I INTERSECTION 7) El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane 8) El Camino Real/Alga Road/Aviara Parkway 39) Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Road 40) Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street 41) Alga Road/Alicante Road DELAY is measured in seconds. LOS = Level of Service DNE = Does Not Exist Zone10 2000/Tab11.723 09/18/00 AM ICU DNE 0.42 ONE DNE 0.46 TABLE 11 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ZONE10 EXISTING YEAR 2005 PM AM PM LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS -DNE -0.54 A 0.69 B A 0.56 A 0.71 C 0.75 C -DNE -0.45 A 0.58 A -ONE -0.52 A 0.77 C A 0.48 A 0.45 A 0.49 A ICU 0.00 > 0.60 0.61 to 0.70 0.71 to 0.80 0.81 to 0.90 0.91 to 1.00 > 1.00 YEAR 2010 YEAR 2020 AM PM AM PM ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS 0.36 A 0.62 B 0.6 A 0.55 A 0.56 A 0.68 B 0.65 B 0.88 D 0.47 A 0.46 A 0.58 A 0.49 A 0.39 A 0.70 B 0.50 A 0.67 B 0.46 A 0.49 A 0.63 B 0.51 A LOS A B C D E F TABLE12 2020 PEAK HOUR SEGMENT OPERATIONS ZONE10 LANES LANES EACH LINK EACH LINK SEGMENT LOCATION DIRECTION VOLUME DIRECTION VIC LOS DIRECTION VOLUME DIRECTION VIC Allcante Road n/o Pointsettia Lane 2 328 NB 0.09 A 2 485 SB 0.13 A s/o Pointsettia Lane 1 65 NB 0.04 A 1 326 SB 0.18 A n/o Alga Road 1 113 NB 0.06 A 1 198 SB 0.11 A Poinsettia Lane e/o El Camino Real 2 855 EB 0.24 A 2 1052 WB 0.29 A w/o Alicante Road 2 796 .EB 0.22 A 2 1085 WB 0.30 A I N Alga Parkway .... e/o El Camino Real 2 1374 EB 0.38 A 2 839 WB 0.23 A w/o Alicante Road 2 1082 EB 0.30 A 2 841 WB 0.23 A Capacity = 1,800 vehicles per hour per lane in the peak direction, by direction I.e. northbound, etc. Y./Q R1nsH ~ 0.00-0.60 A 0.61 -0.70 B 0.71-0.80 C 0.81-0.90 D 0.91 -1.00 E > -1.00 F Tab3,6,9,12.723.xls 2020 11/29/00 LINSCOTT LAV\/ & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS TABLE13 MITIGATION SUMMARY FOR CALCULATED IMPACTS ZONE10 IMPACTED SEGMENT OR EXISTING 2005 2010 INTERSECTION WITH REFERENCE NUMBER INTERSECTIONS 7) El Camino Real/ Construct east and Poinsettia Lane west legs of intersection 8) El Camino Real/Alga Road/ Aviara Parkway 39) Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Construct new Road intersection 40) Poinsettia Lane/ Construct new El Fuerte Street intersection 41) Alga Road/ Construct north leg Alicante Road of intersection SEGMENTS Poinsettia Lane Construct four-lane roadway from El Camino Real to El Fuerte St Alicante Construct two-lane roadway between the proposed school site and AlaaRoad Estrella De Mar Construct two-lane roadway between Poinsettia Ln and Alaa Rd El Fuerte Street Construct two-lane roadway between Palomar Airport Rd and Alaa Rd Note: For detailed improvement descriptions, please refer to text. Source: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers 11 /9/00. Zone10 2000/Tab13.723 04/12/01 -22- 2020 Provide eastbound overlap signal phasing AVIARA PKW'f SOURCE: SANDAG (03/22/00) REV. 10/13/00 LLG723U5.DWG LINSCOTT LA\1V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS ~ ~ C'O --·--····· ···•··· . .-:-:-:-:-:-:-: :-1 .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. I .-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-i --:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:i ·.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.1 ·-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-, ·<-:-:-:-:-:: J . .-... ·.-.-1 -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-i :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:1 -.-.-:::::.1 ·-:-:-:-:-:-:-1 LEGEND I·.--.. <·. -I -Indicates Zone 10 Area xx,:; -Indicates distribution percentage NO SCALE Figure 1 2005 ZONE 10 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES -23- LFMP ZONE 10 AVIARA PKWY SOURCE: SANDAG (03/22/00) REV. 10/13/00 LLG723U5.0WG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS --·--............ . .:-:::-:.:.:.:.:, .·. ·:.::.·:., :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: l -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:, .·::::::.·: .. ·. :-:-:-: :-:-:-:-:-i ·-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:, ·::::: .. I -:-:-:-:-:-:-: i . ---:-:-:-:-:-1 LEGEND j · . .-· . .-.-·j -Indicates Zone 10 Area XX% -Indicates distribution percentage NO SCALE Figure 2 2010 ZONE 10 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES -24-LFMP ZONE 10 AVIARA Pl<Wf SOURCE: SANOAG (03/22/00) REV. 10/13/00 LLC723U5.DWG LINSCOI I L:.\\V & Cl~EENSPAN ENGINEERS --·--. . . . . . . . . . . . . .-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:, :::::::::::::::::::r :: :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:, :/::::::::::::::1 ·-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:, :::\/::::I :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:i ·::::::::::::::r 22X ~ LEGEND !-:-:-:-:-:-::::! -Indicates Zone 10 Area XX,C -Indicates distribution percentage ~ NO SCALE Figure 3 2020 ZONE 10 TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGES -25-LFMP ZONE 10 4 AVIARA PKWY SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) REV. 04/12/01 LLG723U5.DWG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS -26- LEGEND !-:-:-:-:: : :-:I -Indicates Zone 10 Area X -Indicates Number of Lanes @ -Indicates Intersection Number NO SCALE Figure 4 EXISTING CIRCULATION ELEMENT LFMP ZONE 10 a CAMINO REAL/ H..GA ROAD ~r---~8~ ~~ "'~'° '.._ 170/ 85 .,/ ♦ \., -281/229 r 393/264 212/ 91.)1 160/419-'ltr '°t:::a, 185/258 ", -~ ® .!!!It), ,n~r--::?i::? REV. 06/12/00 LLG723U9.DWG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS H..GA ROADRb Al.lCANTE AD -655/381 p 20/ 42 264/894- 80/273", "(' NCI> co-'' @ ,._,., CON ,., "OSA" = Outside Study Area, less than 50 peak hour project traffic volumes in either direction added to intersection. '._AM/PM -AM/PM ,AM/PM E-W STREET 8 ~ ~ (I) I z NO SCALE Figure 5 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS -27-LFMP ZONE 10 4 4 AVIARA PKW'f SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) REV. 10/17/00 L1.G723U5.DWG LINSCO r I LA\\' & (;REEN~l•AN ENGINEERS 6 fO ty r.~~:::.-::: . . . . . . . . . . . . . ············ ············ ············ . . . . . . . . . . . . ············ .......... :-:.:-:.:-:-:<-:. .. .. ~-:::~-:::-:, ········ ·············· ········· ·············· ········ ...... . ········· ·•···· . :-:-r ' . . . . . . . . . . . . .............. .. , .......... . ::::-:-:-:-:-:1 :::::::::/:::] :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:1 :::::::::::::::::::1 /:\::::] .:-:-:-:-:-:-:-1 ·-:-:-:-:-:-:-:1 LEGEND !-:-:---:-: :-:-:-:! -Indicates Zone 10 Area X -Indicates Number of Lanes NO SCALE Figure 6 2005 CIRCULATION ELEMENT -28-LFMP ZONE 10 EL CAMINO R~ POINSETTIA LAN on,.,_ ""N• NN ~5~ NOi-'-.. 282/ 56 ,,,_ -12/ n ..., ''--, 426/1386 97/24_) 't,.. 40/28-0/ 1, __ ,,, _ .... .., ....... ~~ 0 -on-<0111 ""N -- N..GA ROADRb ALICANTE OAD -o .... NN ~~ '-.. 6/ 15 ..., ''---450/433 , 5/ 9 10/ 86 _) ) t f' 390"/575- 40/466 ", ~~"" -;;;.~~ @) rq111 REV. 10/17/00 ll.G723U9.DWG LINS{ OTT LA\V::.... GREEN~PAN ENGINEERS EL CAMINO REAL/ N..GA ROAD POINSETTIA LANE/ ALJCANTE ROAD °'"" ... one"" ~:s~ NOi- -;;;-S";t ,., -1-'-.. 203/ 23 l~i '-.. 42/ 18 -270/284 -550/1247 ..., , '--,soa/238 ..., ''--, 8/ 165 369/ 30_) 't,.. 202/243_) 't f' 185/432-1280/488-306/427", a,,..,.. 4/ 37", GIIDN ~:!lo ~~~ }~-;:;-@ @ .,,::,-.. f;l~ N •oSA • • Outside Study Area, less than 50 peak hour project traffic volumes in either direction added to intersection. POINSETTIA LAN~ EL FUERTE STR ~ ... ., ~~ ~g~ '-.. 24/ 12 t'l N -439/1072 ..., ''--r 11161 111/ 75_) 't t"' 1228/388-40/ so, ~2;'!: ~~~ @) ~t::~ '-..AM/fM -AM-;J'M , AM'/PM E-W STREEI' 8 ffi ? Ill I z NO SCALE Figure 7 2005 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS -29-LFMP ZONE 10 900 Aw.RA PKWY SOURCE: ~DAG (3/22/00) REV. 05/15/01 LLG723U5.DWG LINSCOfT LA\V & CREENSPAN ENCINEERS 0 0 -(',I -30- ...a g LEGEND !-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:! -Indicates Zone 10 Area NOTE: -ADT's are shown midblock Total = 10,980 ADT NO SCALE Figure 8 2005 ZONE 10 ADT's LFMP ZONE 10 6 (0 C'V r7::::::::::::7 : .I :•:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:--·:·J ~2----~ ::::::::::::::::::::: }:-.~.-:-:·:-:-.~., 'DA ~~ . :::::::::::::::::::-· ·::::::::::::::::::::::::·:·:·:·:•:·I 4 . 4 AVIAAA PKWY SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) REV. 10/17/00 LLG723U5.DWG LIN"'COfT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENCilNEERS . :-:•t ············· ............. ........... . . . . . . . . . ~=-· . .-.-.-:·:·:·:·:·:1 :::\::::\::::::I :·:·:·:·:·:·:·:•:•:•:1 ::.·.·::.·.·.·.-.1 ·--·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·1 \::::::::::::] ·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·1 !i r:: /:I .. . ....... . .. . ...... . LEGEND 1--·:--•:•:·:•:•:•:1 -Indicates Zone 10 Area X -Indicates Number of Lanes NO SCALE Figure 9 2010 CIRCULATION ELEMENT -31- LFMP ZONE 10 EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LAN '° ...... <Oo,O _..,_ ~~;::;-_,....,.. '-.. 188/ 51 ..,. .., t \._ -1n/263 , 284/727 290/ 20..) 298/258-~tr 49/ 28", ,-.-? N-~$~ 0 -1t1--,-. M..GA ROA~ ALICANTE OAD ~::J"° i~? '-.. 6/ 16 .., t \._ -408/459 , 5/ 8 25/ 84..) ~tr 306/5-49- -42/471", '°"'" @ 01-;:::-8~ ~- REV. 06/12/00 LLG723U9.DWG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS EL CAMINO REAL/ M..GA ROAD POINSETTIA LANE/ ALICANTE ROAD POINSETTIA LAN~ EL FUERTE STR ""°" ~,~ :8 o,ao ia1" ~~~ NN "°' N--· Nltl-'--190/ 27 ;:::-~~ '-.. 1-4/ 10 ~;::;-~ '-.. 30/ 14 ,.) '° \._ -253/332 '° Nr-.-.., t '... -476/82,4 ,.J t '... -245m5 t , 514/207 , 7/150 , 6/129 190/ 40..) ""'tr 414/225..) ""'' r 101/ 73..) 'it r 178/437-664/487-580/291-297/372", oo-5/ 3,4-, -,-..., 72/134, l'lltll'l ""'° i'' <O~-•'°'° ~ ... :;:,. .............. ~ ION ® 21:g ... @ ... ,... @ O<ON -Nl'l-NIO-- '-..AM/PM -AM/PM ,AM/PM E-W STREET e ~ en ~ I z NO SCALE "OSA" = Outside Study Area, less than 50 peak hour project traffic volumes F ·, g u re in either direction added to intersection. 10 -32- 2010 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS LFMP ZONE 10 0 0 ('.I 800 r.77'.7-.7·:: .... ········· . . . -. . . . . . . .... g 0 s:i ·• •• ·:·: :-:•:·:·:--1 _a_o_o __ -1 : ::::::::::::: .. •~~""."'.~~, 1000 AVIARA Pl<W'f SOURCE: SANDAG (3/22/00) REV. 05/15/01 LLG723U5.DWG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS •·:·•·:·:·:·:·•·: :: .-:·•·:•::·•·•·•·•·•·•·:·•·•·•·•·: I ··•· ..... . ........... . . ....... .... ····-.... . QNE:10 .............. .... .. .. ······· . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -::: I 8 ,,, N . :::::::. I ·•·• •· :• :·: •· :·: •·•·•·I ·:::: ::::. ::. ·::1 •·• •·•·•·• . ·:·:·: :·:•:·:·:·: ·•1 ·•-:·:·:·::: · .. :-:-:-:·:·:::1 ·::::::. ·:::::.·::1 ·:·:•:·: •> ·.:-:-:•:·:• .. , ·:-:·:-:: : : : :< ·:·:·:·:·>:< I . ·:: :::::: . ·: .. ::::1 : : :·: :·:·:·:·:·: ·: ·: :·:·:1 . . . . . . . . . . ··········· ·········· . . . . ' . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . .......... ..... .. ' . ..... .... . .. . ..... . .. . ... ·-. 28 ·: ......... . ALGA RD LEGEND !-:•:•:•:·:·:·:·:I -Indicates Zone 10 Area NOTE: -ADT' s are shown mid block Total = 14,910 ADT NO SCALE Figure 1 1 2010 ZONE 10 ADT's -33-LFMP ZONE 10 6 CD r-777.· 7::·7.-,: :-:-:-:-:-:-:--:-:· ... ······· .. ~ ~~ __ 2 __ __, ::>:: ::::::::: :> .. "."'.'.~·'."'."."."'.'., o ~OA ~O~~ ./: :::::::::: :::::::::::::::::-:-:-:-:-:-1 4 4 AVIARA PKW'I' SOURCE: SANOAG (3/22/00) REV. 04/12/01 LLG723U5.DWG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS . :-:i: ............. .... ········ .. ·············· ·"--ll,,;,,--. . . . . . . . -. . . .. _·_.·::.I _._.:-:-:: -:-:-:-:-:, :-:-:-:-:-:-: : :-:-:-:-1 . _._._._. ._.._._._._, -:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:, :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:--:-:-:-1 _. _ _._._._._._._._._., :::::.· . -:-:-:-: :-: : :-:-:-:, :: .:. •:. ::;::. :: ::~: .. :;::: :::: ::::: :;• .: J -:-:-:-:-:--:-:--:-: -:-»::-: :-:-:-1 ·········· LEGEND 1-:-:-::-::::-:I -Indicates Zone 10 Area X -Indicates Number of Lanes NO SCALE Figure 12 2020 CIRCULATION ELEMENT -34- LFMP ZONE 10 EL CAMINO REAL( POINSETTIA LAN ~:3~ _,..._ ~~~ .... .,.., '-.. 278/ !50 "" -180/197 .,, \.. p 367/805 300/ 22_J 'itr 318/272-78/ 53-, 13:;l~ Cl~ 0 ~~ ... .., ... ., C,<0 - N..GA ROAORbAI) ALICANTE =rn~ ~~ '-.. 9/ 18 ., __ -440/688 .JJ'.. p 5/ 8 254/ 78J 330'/546-'itr 81/458, a,or-, -- @ i~~ •°' REV. 10/17/00 LLG723U9.DWG LINSCOTT LA\\' & CREEN-,PAN ENGINEERS EL CAMINO REAL/ N..GA ROAD POINSETTIA LANE/ AUCANTE ROAD POINSETTIA LAN~ EL FUERTE STR 11:ii """'151 C,§iiii ::.~::. t:ic:; ~~;:,. .:;, '' ..,.,.,... '-.. 22/ 27 gaoo "'g"' ,... ... a, .,.N '-.. 56/ 19 '-.. 199/ 54 --520/836 --293/700 .) '\._ -261/339 _., l '.. .,, \.. p608/446 p 11/ 81 p 11/113 1531 61_} "tr 516/268J 'it r 2181 so _J "tr 554/496-Ma/JOO-209/470-7/ 32, ~~2 118'/1&6, ii~ 374/534, l;;i~ ~~t::. ~;:,.i ~i's' @ .,_ @ ~:!lr:: -@ N .- "'°'"' - !::i~ pNA"/PM E-W STRED' Iii I ~ u, I z NO SCALE •oSA • = Outside Study Area, less than 50 peak hour project traffic volumes F ·, g u re in either direction added to intersection. 13 -35- 2020 TRAFFIC VOLUMES AM/PM PEAK HOURS LFMP ZONE 10 1000 AVIARA PKWY SOURCE: SANDAG {3/22/00) REV. 05/15/01 LLG723U5~DWG LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS 800 0 ~ - o C?7~? , ...... · ·· .. ... .. ·•··· .. ...... ·•· .. . ... ····· .. . ..... ..... . !:) . . :: :::::::::: . ~?:7~, '. . .... .. . .......... "' ... .. . . ···• --···· ...... . . . . .... '·········· "' ..... ······ .... ·•·· ONE:! ............ ...... ..... . . . . . . . . . . ·:::1 :--:-> :-:-: : :-:-:, : :-:-:-:-:-:-:-:--:-: I :::::::::::::::::::::: . :-:-:-:-::: :-:-:-1 ... · .. _._._., -: : :-: :-:-:-:, <· -: :-:-:-:-1 !l ./ . ) i r-:··--:-:-:-:->:--:-:-··· .......... . . . LEGEND -0 0 0 1.-. · : ·<: I -Indicates Zone 10 Area NOTE: -ADT's are shown midblock Total = 14,910 ADT NO SCALE Figure 14 2020 ZONE 10 ADT's -36-LFMP ZONE 10 EXISTING EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE DOES NOT EXIST 0 EL CAMINO REAL/ /IJ..GA ROAD .!... -4U '--'--~ s-- j )) ttt r == tt , ® YEAR 2005 EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE' ..)... -.(U '--\. ~ Sr---~ """ ttrr ~ s 0 MmGATION EL CAMINO REAL/ /IJ..GA ROAD .!... -4H '--'--~ Sr--- j ,, ttt r == It , ® YEAR 2010 EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE' .!... -4H "'-'--~ s ,____ j ,')fft--r -- 0 EL CAMINO REAL/ /IJ..GA ROAD -1111..1..L t Sr--- j ,')ftf r -- ® YEAR 2020 EL CAMINO REAL/ POINSETTIA LANE' .!... -4U '--'--~ LEGEND @ -Traffic Signal @ -Unsignalized FF -Free Flow RTOL -Right-tum Overlap S1-- j )) tf}--r NOTE: (N)-North ~ @ (S)-South 0 , -(E)-East EL CAMINO REAL/ /IJ..GA ROAD -1111..1..Lt S1---- j ,,tttr =: It RrOL, @ MmGATION (W)-West POINSETTIA LANE/ POINSETTIA LANE/ POINSETTIA LANE/ POINSETTIA LANE/ ALICANTE ROAD ALICANTE ROAD ALICANTE ROAD ALICANTE ROAD · DOES NOT EXIST POINSETTIA LANE/ EL FUERTE STREU DOES NOT EXIST /IJ..GA ROAD/ ALICANTE R'OAD -- REV. 10/16/00 LG723U8.DWG ◄'--~ 4'--~ 4 ',.. ±: ~ s.., s s' -"y ::!. ,Y ::!. ,Y ,. ' ,. @ MmGATION @ @ POINSETTIA LANftr EL FUERTE STR POINSETTIA LANftr EL FUERTE STR POINSETTIA LAN~ EL FUERTE STR ◄I'--¼: 4l '--±: 41'--±: Sr s' s' ::!. "tr· :!. 'tt--~ f"\tl-,. ' @ MmGATION @ @ /IJ..GA ROADRb ALICANTE AD /IJ..GA ROADRb AUCANTE AD /IJ..GA RO~ ALICANTE OAD ◄'--~ .!... 4 \. ±:: 4 \. -, s ..) s s' E-W STREET 8 ::!. 'tr -,Y ::! )y ~ ,. ,. ,. (/) ~ I z @ MmGATION @ @ NO SCALE "OSA" = Outside Study Area, less than 50 peak hour project traffic volumes F ·1 g u re 1 5 in either direction added to intersection. LINSCOTT LA\V & GREENSPAN Mitigation is shown bold. LANE GEOMETRY CONDmONS Existing geometry is shown shaded. ENGINEERS -37-LFMP ZONE 10 • 1 LINSCOTT LA\t\/ & GREENSPAN ENGINEERS. APPENDIX A LFMP ZONE 10 ~ '----'--~ _______. ------...,___,,,_.. ------__,.... INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #8 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #8 INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Alga Road INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Alga Road SCENARIO : Existing Conditions SCENARIO : Existing Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK.HR: AM COUNT DATE: PEAK.HR :PM --------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (I} HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 2 3600 135 0.04 NB Left 2 3600 316 0.09 * NB Thru 3 6000 807 0.13 • NBThru 3 6000 577 0.10 NB Right FF FF 0 137 0.00 NB Right FF FF 0 409 0.00 SB Left 2 3600 57 0.02 • SB Left 2 3600 321 0.09 SB Thru 3 6000 431 0.09 SB Thru 3 6000 1007 0.20 • SB Right 0 0 88 0 SB Right 0 0 184 0 EB Left 2 3600 212 0.06 • EB Left 2 3600 91 0.03 EB Thru 2 4000 160 0.04 EB Thru 2 4000 419 0.10 * EB Rii!ht I 1800 185 0.10 EB Right I 1800 258 0.14 WB Left 2 3600 393 0.11 WB Left 2 3600 264 0.07 • WBThru 2 4000 281 0.11 • WBThru 2 4000 229 0.08 WB Right 0 0 170 0 WBRight 0 0 85 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.15 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.29 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.32 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.46 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.42 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.56 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 .. ~ ........_. ...,,__....., ........__...._ ....__..,, INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 41 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 41 INTERSECTION: Alga Rd/Alicante Rd INTERSECTION: Alga Rd/Alicante Rd SCENARIO: Existing Conditions SCENARIO : Existing Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR: AM COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : PM ---------------------------ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left I 1800 367 0.20 * NB Left l 1800 162 0.09 * NB Thru 0 0 0 0 NB Thru 0 0 0 0 NB Right l 1800 23 0.01 NB Right 1 1800 19 0.01 SB Left 0 0 0 0 SB Left 0 0 0 0 SB Thru 0 0 0 0 * SB Thru 0 0 0 0 * SB Right 0 0 0 0 SB Right 0 0 0 0 EB Left 1 1800 0 0.00 * EB Left 1 1800 0 0.00 EB Thru 2 4000 264 0.09 EB Thru 2 4000 894 0.29 * EB Right 0 0 80 0 EB Right 0 0 273 0 WB Left I 1800 20 0,01 WB Left l 1800 0 0.00 * WBThru 2 4000 655 0.16 * WBThru 2 4000 361 0.10 WB Right 0 0 0 0 WB Right 0 0 42 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.20 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.09 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.16 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.29 SUM OF CRITICAL V /C RA TIO 0.36 SUM OF CRITICAL V /C RA TIO 0.38 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.46 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.48 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 . ·, -------~ i....--,..-. _____ ___. ______,. ______. --· ~ INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #7 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #7 INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM ---------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES {1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 2 3600 I 0.00 NB Left 2 3600 11 0.00 * NB Thru 3 6000 1,765 0.29 * NBThru 3 6000 471 0.08 NB Right l 1800 1,281 0.71 NB Right 1 1800 535 0.30 SB Left 2 3600 116 0.03 * SB Left 2 3600 241 0,07 SB Thru 3 6000 591 0.10 SB Thru 3 6000 1223 0.22 * SB Right 0 0 22 0 SB Right 0 0 75 0 EB Left 2 3600 97 0.03 EB Left 2 3600 24 0.01 EB Thru 2 4000 40 0.01 * EB Thru 2 4000 28 0.01 * EB Right l 1800 28 0,02 EB Right I 1800 l 0.00 WB Left 2 3800 426 0.11 * WB Left 2 3800 1386 0.36 * WB Thru 2 4000 12 0.o7 WB Thru 2 4000 77 O.QJ WBRight 0 0 282 0 WBRiimt 0 0 56 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.32 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.22 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.12 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.37 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.44 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.59 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.54 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.69 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #8 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #8 INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Alga Road INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Alga Road SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DATE: PEAKHR :PM --------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 253 0.07 NB Left 2 3600 409 0.11 • NB Thru 3 6000 2,327 0.39 * NB Thru 3 6000 694 0.12 NB Right FF FF 0 233 0.00 NB Right FF FF 0 674 0.00 SB Left 2 3600 13 0.00 * SB Left 2 3600 174 0.05 SB Thru 3 6000 857 0.15 SB Thru 3 6000 1907 0.36 • SB Right 0 0 19 0 SB Ri~ht 0 0 259 0 EB Left 2 3600 369 0.10 * EB Left 2 3600 30 0.01 EB Thru 2 4000 185 0.05 EB Thru 2 4000 432 0.11 • EB Right 1 1800 306 0.17 EB Right 1 1800 427 0.24 WB Left 2 3600 508 0.14 WB Left 2 3600 238 0.07 • WBThru 2 4000 270 0.12 • WBThru 2 4000 284 0.08 WB Right 0 0 203 0 WB Right 0 0 23 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.39 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.47 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.22 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.18 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.61 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.65 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.71 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.75 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71-<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 ,,. --It. ... • .. ......._,,. .............., --------- INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 39 INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Rd SCENARIO: Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM ------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AMPEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left l 1800 50 0.03 • NBThru 0 0 112 0 NBRililit l 1800 72 0.04 SB Left 1 1800 28 0.02 SB Thru 0 0 4 o• SB Right 1 1800 64 0.04 EB Left l 1800 202 0.11 EBThru 2 4000 1280 0.32 • EB Rililit 0 0 4 0 WBLeft l 1800 8 0.00 • WBThru 2 4000 550 0.15 WBRiJ;tht 0 0 42 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.03 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.32 SUM OF CRITICAL V/CRATIO 0.35 ADWSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.45 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximwn VIC A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 39 INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Rd SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK.HR :_PM ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 1 1800 9 0.01 NBThru 0 0 18 o• NBRililit 1 1800 12 0.01 SB Left l 1800 43 0.02 • SB Thru 0 0 88 0 SB Right 1 1800 317 0.18 EB Left 1 1800 243 0.14 • EBThru 2 4000 468 0.13 EB Rililit 0 0 37 0 WBLeft l 1800 165 0.09 WBThru 2 4000 1247 0.32 • WBRight 0 0 18 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.02 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.46 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.48 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.58 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions • ____. . . . ___, -...... # 40 COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM --------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left I 1800 124 0.07 • NBThru 2 4000 175 0.08 NBRhtht 0 0 152 0 SB Left I 1800 26 0.01 SB Thru 2 4000 65 0.03 • SB Right 0 0 36 0 EB Left 1 1800 Ill 0.06 EB Thru 2 4000 1228 0.32 • EB Right 0 0 40 0 WB Left l 1800 7 0.00 • WBThru 2 4000 439 0.12 WBRight 0 0 24 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS , 0.10 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.32 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.42 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.52 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximwn V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >l.O .. •· ............ - INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 40 INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street SCENARIO: Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR: PM ------------ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left I 1800 25 0.01 • NBThru 2 4000 80 0.02 NB Right 0 0 14 0 • SB Left I 1800 196 0.11 SB Thru 2 4000 424 0.19 • SB Right 0 0 334 0 EB Left l 1800 75 0.04 • EB Thru 2 4000 388 0.11 EB Right 0 0 60 0 WB Left I 1800 161 0.09 WBThru 2 4000 1072 0.27 • WBRight 0 0 12 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.36 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.31 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.67 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.77 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) C LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 .. ..... ----.-....ii ............._, INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION #41 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 41 INTERSECTION: Alga Rd/Alicante Rd INTERSECTION: _A_,lg,._a_R_d/_A_l_ic_an_t_e _R_d __________ _ SCENARIO : Year 2005 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2005 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM ---------------------------ANALYST: AGENCY: Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left I 1800 359 0.20 • NB Left 1 1800 87 0.05 • NBThru I 2000 88 0.05 NB Thru 1 2000 46 0.03 NB Right 0 0 6 0 NB Right 0 0 7 0 SB Left l 1800 12 0.01 SB Left l 1800 7 0.00 SB Thru l 2000 7 0.03"' SB Thru l 2000 120 0.07 * SB Right 0 0 58 0 SB Right 0 0 21 0 EB Left 1 1800 10 0.01 • EB Left I 1800 86 0.05 EB Thru 2 4000 390 0.11 EB Thru 2 4000 575 0.26 • EB Right 0 0 40 0 EB Right 0 0 466 0 WB Left I 1800 5 0.00 WB Left l 1800 9 0.01 • WB Thru 2 4000 450 0.11 • WB Thru 2 4000 433 0.11 WB Right 0 0 6 0 WB RiJ1;ht 0 0 15 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.23 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.12 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.12 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.27 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.35 SUM OF CRITICAL V /C RA TIO 0.39 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.45 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.49 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0 -<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 ' .. -- INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #7 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION #7 INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR : _A_M ___ _ COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : PM -------------ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 18 0.01 * NB Left 2 3600 27 0.01 * NB Thru 3 6000 155 0.03 NB Thru 3 6000 511 0.09 NB Right 1 1800 714 0.40 NB Right 1 1800 448 0.25 SB Left 2 3600 23 0.01 SB Left 2 3600 104 0.03 SB Thru 3 6000 477 0.08 * SB Thru 3 6000 1394 0.26 * SB Right 0 0 17 0 SB Right 0 0 166 0 EB Left 2 3600 290 0.08 * EB Left 2 3600 20 0.01 EB Thru 2 4000 298 0.07 EB Thru 2 4000 258 0.06 * EB Right 1 1800 49 0.03 EB Right 1 1800 28 0.02 WB Left 2 3800 284 O.D7 WB Left 2 3800 727 0.19 * WB Thru 2 4000 177 0.09 * WBThru 2 4000 263 0.08 WBRight 0 0 188 0 WB Right 0 0 51 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.09 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.27 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.25 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.26 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.52 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.36 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.62 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 ,, . ~ ... ~ ~ ~ _____. .__......,__,. ~ _______,. ----- INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #8 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION #8 INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Alga Road INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/ Alga Road SCENARIO : Year 2010 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 20 IO Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM ------------COUNTDATE: _______ PEAK HR :_P.;....M __ _ ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: _______ AGENCY: Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left 2 3600 209 0.06 NB Left 2 3600 470 0.13 • NB Thru 3 6000 1,668 0.28 • NBThru 3 6000 670 0.11 NB Right FF FF 0 146 0.00 NB Right FF FF 0 661 0.00 SB Left 2 3600 17 0.00 • SB Left 2 3600 157 0.04 SB Thru 3 6000 657 0.11 SB Thru 3 6000 1488 0.28 • SB Risdtt 0 0 20 0 SB Right 0 0 187 0 EB Left 2 3600 190 0.05 EB Left 2 3600 40 0.01 EB Thru 2 4000 178 0.04 • EBThru 2 4000 437 0.11 • EB Right I 1800 297 0.17 EB Ril!ht 1 1800 372 0.21 WBLeft 2 3600 514 0.14 • WBLeft 2 3600 207 0.06 • WBThru 2 4000 253 0.11 WBThru 2 4000 332 0.09 WBRight 0 0 190 0 WBRight 0 0 27 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.28 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.41 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.18 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.46 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.58 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.56 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.68 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 39 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 39 INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Rd INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Rd SCENARIO : Year 20 IO Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : PM ---------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left I 1800 44 0.02 * NB Left 1 1800 11 0.01 NBThru 0 0 146 0 NB Thru 0 0 17 0 * NB Right 1 1800 72 0.04 NB Right 1 1800 13 0.01 SB Left 1 1800 4 0.00 SB Left I 1800 28 0.02 * SB Thru 0 0 4 0 * SB Thru 0 0 129 0 SB Right 1 1800 67 0.04 SB Right I 1800 258 0.14 EB Left 1 1800 414 0.23 * EB Left I 1800 225 0.13 * EB Thru 2 4000 664 0.17 EB Thru 2 4000 487 0.13 EB Right 0 0 5 0 EB Right 0 0 34 0 WB Left 1 1800 7 0.00 WB Left I 1800 150 0.08 WBThru 2 4000 476 0.12 * WB Thru 2 4000 824 0.21 * WBRight 0 0 14 0 WBRight 0 0 IO 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.02 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.02 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.35 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.34 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RA TIO 0.37 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.36 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.47 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.46 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 • <= C .71 • <= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 • <= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 • <= FF= Free Flow E .91. <= FF= Free Flow E .91 • <= F >1.0 F >LO INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 40 INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_AM ___ _ ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad ------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 204 0.11 • NBThru 2 4000 364 0.12 NB Ri2ht 0 0 123 0 SB Left 1 1800 10 0.01 SB Thru 2 4000 73 0.02 • SB Right 0 0 22 0 EB Left 1 1800 101 0.06 EBThru 2 4000 580 0.16 • EB Ri2ht 0 0 72 0 WB Left 1 1800 6 0.00 • WBThru 2 4000 245 0,07 WB Rillht 0 0 30 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.13 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.16 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.29 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.39 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximwn VIC A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF• Free Flow E .91 -<= F >t.0 ◄ .. ... ,. .. 4 Jo. . ... ........__. ~ ~ ~,.____ .....--..ii ...... ~..---, --- INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 40 INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street SCENARIO: Year 2010 Conditions COUNT DATE: _______ PEAK HR :_P_M __ _ ANALYST: _______ AGENCY: Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 63 0.04 • NB Thru 2 4000 75 0.02 NB Right 0 0 13 0. SB Left 1 1800 97 0.05 SB Thru 2 4000 478 0.16 • SB Right 0 0 149 0 EB Left 1 1800 73 0.04 • EB Thru 2 4000 291 0.11 EB Ri2ht 0 0 134 0 WB Left 1 1800 129 ·0.07 WBThru 2 4000 775 0.20 • WB Right 0 0 14 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.36 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.60 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.70 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximwn V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >t.0 .. .... .. ► .. ......___.. ~ ----....... ____. .............. ....,___, ---- INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 41 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 41 INTERSECTION: Alga Rd/ Alicante Rd INTERSECTION: ..:..A::ilg:z::a:...::;R.:.;:d/:.:A.;.;l~ic;;::an;:.;te:;..R:.:d;;;__ __________ _ SCENARIO: Year20IOConditions SCENARIO : Year 20 IO Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : PM --------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 1 1800 387 0.22 * NB Left 1 1800 96 0.05 * NBThru I 2000 100 0.05 NBThru 1 2000 13 0.01 NB Right 0 0 5 0 NB Right 0 0 7 0 SB Left 1 1800 12 0.01 SB Left 1 1800 8 0.00 SB Thru I 2000 7 0.03 * SB Thru I 2000 133 0.08 * SB Right 0 0 54 0 SB Rildit 0 0 27 0 EB Left 1 1800 25 0.01 * EB Left 1 1800 84 0.05 EBThru 2 4000 306 0.09 EBThru 2 4000 549 0.26 * EB Right 0 0 42 0 EB Ril!ht 0 0 471 0 WB Left 1 1800 5 0.00 WB Left 1 1800 8 0.00 * WBThru 2 4000 408 0.10 * WB Thru 2 4000 459 0.12 WB Right 0 0 6 0 WBRight 0 0 16 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.25 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.13 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.11 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.26 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.36 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.39 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.46 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.49 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SER VICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0 -<== A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<== NOTES: B .61-<= C .71 -<== C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >J.0 F >1.0 ........__ INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #7 INTERSECTION: El Camino ReaVPoinsettia Lane SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM --------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 36 0.01 NBThru 3 6000 1,824 0.30 • NB Right 1 1800 682 0.38 SB Left 2 3600 32 0.01 • SB Thru 3 6000 768 0.13 SB Right 0 0 16 0 EB Left 2 3600 300 0.08 • EB Thru 2 4000 318 0.08 EB Right 1 1800 78 0.04 WB Left 2 3800 367 0.10 WB Thru 2 4000 180 0.11 • WBRight 0 0 278 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.31 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.19 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.50 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.60 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<::; NOTES: B .61 • <::; C .71-<::; • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<::; FF= Free Flow E .91 -<== F >1.0 .. ~ . ------ INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #7 INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Poinsettia Lane SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR: PM ------------ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 63 0.02 • NB Thru 3 6000 623 0.10 NB Right 1 1800 479 0.27 SB Left 2 3600 104 0.03 SB Thru 3 6000 753 0.15 • SB Right 0 0 176 0 EB Left 2 3600 22 0.01 EB Thru 2 4000 272 0.07 • EB Right 1 1800 53 0.03 WB Left 2 3800 805 0.21 • WBThru 2 4000 197 0.06 WB Right 0 0 50 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.17 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.28 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.45 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.55 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum V/C A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 Ii' F F "------------___,_..,.,..,.. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #8 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION #8 INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Alga Road INTERSECTION: El Camino Real/Alga Road SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DATE: PEAKHR :PM --------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (I) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left 2 3600 319 0.09 NB Left 2 3600 497 0.14 • NBThru 3 6000 1,935 0.32 • NB Thru 3 6000 990 0.17 NB Right FF FF 0 371 0.00 NB Right FF FF 0 736 0.00 SB Left 2 3600 37 0.01 • SB Left 2 3600 168 0.05 SB Thru 3 6000 1,061 0.18 SB Thru 3 6000 2207 0.40 • SB Right 0 0 33 0 SB Right 0 0 199 0 EB Left 2 3600 163 0.05 EB Left 2 3600 61 0.02 EB Thru 2 4000 209 0.05 • EB Thru 2 4000 470 0.12 • EB Right 1 1800 374 0.21 EB Right I 1800 534 0.30 WB Left 2 3600 608 0.17 • WB Left 2 3600 446 0.12 • WB Thru 2 4000 261 0.12 WBThru 2 4000 339 0.10 WB Rirnt 0 0 199 0 WB Right 0 0 54 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.33 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.54 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.22 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.24 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.55 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RA TIO 0.78 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.65 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.88 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) D LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 ,. a 5 .oli Ii-• a.. ~ t,;, _. ,::.;.,_ """'"""'"__,,,,,.. .....____. '........_.. ..... .., .......... ...,._.. ... _,_ INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #.39 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 39 INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Rd INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/Alicante Rd SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions COUNTDATE: _______ PEAKHR :.;.;AM;;...;.. __ _ COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : PM ------------ANALYST: _______ AGENCY: Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME V/C NB Left l 1800 69 0.04 NB Left 1 1800 12 0.01 NBThru 0 0 113 0. NBThru 0 0 33 o• NB Right l 1800 305 0.17 NBRi2ht 1 1800 20 0.01 SB Left 1 1800 93 0.05 • SB Left 1 1800 35 0.02 • SB Thru 0 0 12 0 SB Thru 0 0 213 0 SB Rildtt l 1800 170 0.09 SBRi2ht 1 1800 237 0.13 EB Left 1 1800 516 0.29 • EB Left 1 1800 268 0.15 • EB Thru 2 4000 554 0.14 EBThru 2 4000 496 0.13 EB Right 0 0 7 0 EBRi2ht 0 0 32 0 WBLeft 1 1800 11 0.01 WBLeft 1 1800 81 0.05 WBThru 2 4000 520 0.14 • WBThru 2 4000 836 0.22 • WBRight 0 0 22 0 WBRight 0 0 27 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.05 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.02 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.43 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.37 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.48 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RA TIO 0.39 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION acrn 0.58 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.49 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61-<= NOTES: B .61-<= C .71-<= C .71-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= FF= Free Flow E .91-<= F >LO F >1.0 -------..,____. INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION #:4o INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION # 40 INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street INTERSECTION: Poinsettia Lane/El Fuerte Street SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DATE: PEAK HR: PM --------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST: AGENCY : Carlsbad -------- MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME VIC NB Left I 1800 208 0.12 NB Left 1 1800 90 0.05 • NBThru 2 4000 604 0.18 * NB Thru 2 4000 66 0.02 NB Right 0 0 102 0 NB Right 0 0 20 0. SB Left l 1800 26 O.oI * SB Left I 1800 81 0.05 SB Thru 2 4000 118 0.03 SB Thru 2 4000 592 0.19 • SB Right 0 0 20 0 SB Right 0 0 157 0 EB Left 1 1800 218 0.12 • EB Left I 1800 60 0.03 • EB Thru 2 4000 648 0.19 EB Thru 2 4000 300 0.12 EB Right 0 0 118 0 EB Right 0 0 166 0 WB Left I 1800 11 O.oI WB Left I 1800 113 0.06 WBThru 2 4000 293 0.09 • WBThru 2 4000 700 0.18 • WB Right 0 0 56 0 WBRight 0 0 19 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.19 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.36 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.21 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.21 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.40 SUM OF CRITICAL VIC RATIO 0.57 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.50 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.67 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LOS Maximum LOS Maximum VIC VIC A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71 -<= C .71 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= • Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 41 INTERSECTION CAP A CITY UTILIZATION # 41 INTERSECTION: Alga Rd/ Alicante Rd INTERSECTION: .;.A;.:.Jga;c;;,.;.R;;;;:d/;;.;;.A.:.;;l;.;;;ic;;;;;an;.;;;te;..;R;;;.;d;.__ _________ _ SCENARIO : Year 2020 Conditions SCENARIO: Year 2020 Conditions COUNT DA TE: PEAK HR : AM COUNT DATE: PEAK HR : PM ------------------------ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad ANALYST : AGENCY : Carlsbad MOVEMENT NO.of CAPACITY AM PEAK ADJUSTED AM PEAK MOVEMENT NO. of CAPACITY PM PEAK ADJUSTED PM PEAK LANES (l) HOUR VOLUME V/C LANES (1) HOUR VOLUME. V/C NB Left 1 1800 428 0.24 * NB Left 1 1800 119 0.07 * NBThru I 2000 99 0.05 NBThru I 2000 19 0.01 NB Right 0 0 5 0 NB Right 0 0 7 0 SB Left 1 1800 17 O.ot SB Left I 1800 12 0.01 SB Thru l 2000 1l 0.04 * SB Thru I 2000 150 0.09 * SB Right 0 0 62 0 SBRiaht 0 0 36 0 EB Left I 1800 254 0.14 * EB Left 1 1800 78 0.04 EB Thru 2 4000 330 0.10 EBThru 2 4000 546 0.25 * EB Right 0 0 61 0 EBRi2ht 0 0 458 0 WB Left 1 1800 5 0.00 WB Left 1 1800 8 0.00 * WBThru 2 4000 440 0.11 * WB Thru 2 4000 686 0.18 WB Ri!!ht 0 0 9 0 WB Right 0 0 16 0 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.28 NORTH/SOUTH CRITICAL SUMS 0.16 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.25 EAST/WEST CRITICAL SUMS 0.25 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.53 SUM OF CRITICAL V/C RATIO 0.41 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 ADJUSTMENT FOR LOST TIME 0.10 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.63 INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION (ICU) 0.51 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) B LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A LOS Maximum LOS Maximum V/C V/C A 0-<= A 0-<= NOTES: B .61 -<= NOTES: B .61 -<= C .71-<= C .71 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= * Denotes Critical Movements D .81 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= FF= Free Flow E .91 -<= F >1.0 F >1.0 Local Facilities Management Plan• Zone 10 A-5 DISTRICT WILL SERVE LETTER June. 2000 XIX-7 ·D·UDE.K & ASSOCIATES, INC. Professfonal T.!oam, for Comple.: Projects April 11,2001 Mr. Timothy O'Grady Morrow Development Engineering, Planning, Environmental Sciences and Management Services 6965 El Camino Real, Suite 105 Carlsbad, CA 92009 Corporate Office: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 760.942.5147 Fax 760.632.0164 2647-00 Re: Leucadia County Water District (LCWD) Response to Morrow Development Request For Sewer Availability for The Greens Carlsbad Tentative Parcel CT 99-03 Dear Mr. O'Grady: This letter provides a response to your request dated April 4, 2001 for sewer availability from Leucadia County Water District (District), dated April 4, 2001 for The Greens. Sewer service is available for 589 to 610 Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs), as requested, conditional on the following items. Currently, the facilities adjacent to the project do not have adequate capacity to convey wastewater flows from the subject project. There are future downstream sewer improvements planned including the: La Costa Greens Trunk Sewer; Leucadia Pump Station Improvements; Batiquitos Influent Sewer; Batiquitos Pump Station Improvements, and Occidental Sewer Improvements. These projects are scheduled in the 1999 LCWD Wastewater Master Plan and will be funded by existing LCWD reserves and future connection fees. The District owns adequate capacity at the Encina Water Pollution Control Facility to treat wastewater from the subject project. Of the above noted projects, only the La Costa Greens Trunk Sewer must be completed prior to new connections from The Greens. LCWD timing for completion of La Costa Greens Trunk Sewer is as follows: Preliminary Engineering Study CEQA and Final Design Construction Fiscal 2000/01 Fiscal 2001/02 Start March 2003, Finish June 2003 Construction work through the North La Costa Resort Golf Course may not start until immediately after the golf tournament scheduled for February 2003. Work on the golf course should be completed in a timely manner once started. At the request and expense of Morrow Development, LCWD will conduct a brief additional analysis of the existing sewer to determine how many EDU' s from The Greens may connect prior to completion of the La Costa Greens Trunk Sewer work. There are some subdrainage area neighborhoods that will be less impacting to the upper reaches of the existing La Costa Greens Trunk Sewer that may be allowed to connect earlier pending completion of a more detailed study._ Please see the attached letter to Mr. Clyde Wickham, City of Carlsbad, regarding sewer service boundary issues. The portion of the project shown in Exibit A south of the existing sewer service boundary between 10.S Mr. Timothy O'Grady Sewer Availability for The Greens April 11, 2001 Pagel of2 LCWD and Carlsbad has previously been annexed to LCWD. If the service boundary is adjusted, all City, LCWD, and LAFCO processing will be required ·prior to sewer connection. LCWD is in support of the boundary adjustment shown in Exhibit B to that letter and opposes the boundary adjustment proposed in Exhibit C. Maintenance of the existing boundary shown in Exhibit A may result a need for additional pump stations, that should be avoided if possible. Resolution of the final boundary location will require agreement between LCWD, City of Carlsbad, and LAFCO. Tentative and Final Maps, Grading Plans, and Improvement Plans must be submitted to the District for review. A tentative map review deposit of $1,000 is required at this time for preparation of this sewer service letter and some preliminary EDU analysis. Any unused tentative map funds will become available towards additional plan check and inspection deposits required. Following plan check, the developer must enter into a development agreement with the District and make deposits for field inspection and television inspection of all new sewer work. Actual costs may vary depending on the issues encountered during the map review, plan checking, and construction inspection process. Connection fees must be paid after acceptance of sewer construction and prior to house connection. The District assesses connection fees of $3,950 for each EDU within the development. A single family house, condominium, or apartment is one EDU. Please note that connection fees are adjusted on a District-wide basis from time to time. The District also assesses an annual sewer service fee last adjusted (reduced) on July 1, 1999 to $155 per residential unit per year. Annual sewer service charges are also adjusted from time to time by LCWD. The project will increase District maintenance requirements. Annual sewer service fees paid by the new residents will cover the additional cost of this increased maintenance including pumping, transmission, treatment, and disposal. In summary, LCWD is committed to providing sewer service to The Greens in accordance with the above conditions. Please call, if you have any questions. Very truly yours, DUDEK & Associates, Inc. 4£~~~"1' LCWD District Engineer cc: Mr. Mike Bardin, LCWD General Manager Mr. Frank Reynaga, LCWD Customer Service Ms. Susanne Lockhart, Dudek, Plan Checking · Mr. Dexter Wilson, Dexter Wilson Engineering Attachment Copy of 4/11/01 letter to Mr. Clyde Wickham, City of Carlsbad 10.6