Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-07-18; City Council; ; Selecting Intersection Traffic Control for the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements ProjectCA Review GH Meeting Date: July 18, 2023 To: Mayor and City Council From: Scott Chadwick, City Manager Staff Contact: Lauren Ferrell, Associate Engineer lauren.ferrell@carlsbadca.gov, 442-339-2558 Tom Frank, Transportation Director/City Engineer tom.frank@carlsbadca.gov, 442-339-2766 Subject: Selecting Intersection Traffic Control for the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements Project District: 1 Recommended Action 1.Adopt a resolution approving a roundabout at the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue as the preferred intersection traffic control option and authorizing staff to move forward with the environmental review, permitting and final engineering design of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements Project; or 2.Adopt a resolution approving a traffic signal at the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue as the preferred intersection traffic control option and authorizing staff to move forward with the environmental review, permitting and final engineering design of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements Project. Executive Summary The area around Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue is one of Carlsbad’s best places to enjoy the coast, with an ocean-view restaurant, beach parking lot, restrooms, showers, a bus stop, walking paths and picnic areas. In its current design, drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians need to navigate four lanes of north-south traffic, which becomes backed up during peak times. Pedestrians routinely walk around a bus stop island when crossing Tamarack Avenue, only to be faced with a single-file sidewalk over the lagoon inlet bridge. There, people with dogs and strollers must stop to let others pass, while some hop the guardrail and walk in the bike lane. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 1 of 356 To improve this intersection, staff have sought input from the public, completed technical studies and reviewed traffic data to develop designs that not only work better but support the City Council policies related to traffic safety, mobility and environmental sustainability. This report describes two intersection traffic control options for the City Council’s consideration for the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements Project, Capital Improvement Program Project No. 6058. Staff are recommending the roundabout because: • A roundabout at this intersection will reduce the delay for drivers, resulting in a 13- second delay compared to a 30-second delay with a traffic signal intersection • Roundabouts force cars to slow down, which significantly reduces all types of injury collisions • Roundabouts are self-enforcing, meaning the design causes drivers to use more caution • Many other areas with high amounts of pedestrians and visitors have had success with roundabouts • The San Diego County Bicycle Coalition supports the roundabout option as the best design for cyclists of all types1 • The Traffic & Mobility Commission recommended the roundabout option Explanation & Analysis Guiding principles The project’s improvements are proposed in accordance with local policies previously approved by the City Council, including the city’s Mobility Element of the General Plan, the Sustainable Mobility Plan, Climate Action Plan and the city’s Engineering Standards. Mobility Element The overarching document that identifies the city’s core transportation goals is the General Plan’s Mobility Element, which was approved by the City Council in 2015. This replaced what was previously called the Circulation Element, a plan largely based on the circulation needs of a single mode of travel – the car. The Mobility Element sets forth several goals related to sustainable mobility: • Keep the City of Carlsbad moving with complete streets that provide a safe, balanced, cost effective, multi-modal transportation system (vehicles, pedestrians, bikes and transit), accommodating the mobility needs of all community members, including children, the elderly and the disabled. (Goal 3-G.1) • Provide for the safe and efficient movement of goods throughout the city. (Goal 3-G.7) 1 See Why We Love the Carlsbad and Tamarack Roundabout, sdbikecoalition.org/2023/01/why-we-love-the- carlsbad-and-tamarack-roundabout/ July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 2 of 356 Identity street and coastal street Not all streets have the same purpose. Some serve residential neighborhoods; some are more traveled routes, and some are major thoroughfares. That dictates how they are designed. In the Mobility Element, Carlsbad Boulevard, north of the Tamarack Avenue intersection, falls under the category of an identity street. These streets provide the primary access to and from the heart of the city – the Village. They are designed to safely move all modes of travel, while enhancing mobility for pedestrians and bicyclists. The identity street design elements state: • Vehicle speeds should be managed to promote safe pedestrian and bicycle movement • No pedestrian shall cross more than five vehicular travel and/or turn lanes • Where feasible, bicycle lanes should be provided • Traffic calming devices, such as curb extensions, also known as bulb-outs, or enhanced pedestrian crossings should be considered and evaluated for implementation • Pedestrians should typically be “buffered” from vehicle traffic using landscaping or parked vehicles Carlsbad Boulevard, south of Tamarack Avenue, falls under the Mobility Element category of a coastal street, which is to have the following characteristics: • Primary purpose is to move people along the city’s ocean waterfront and connect people to the beach, recreation, businesses and residences near the waterfront. The street serves as a destination for people, who seek to drive, walk and bicycle along the ocean waterfront • Designed to safely move all modes of travel, while enhancing mobility for pedestrians and bicyclists • Vehicle speeds shall be managed to support uses along the coast • Pedestrian facilities should be a minimum of five feet and shall strive for six to eight feet in width and shall conform to the Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA, design requirements • Pedestrian crossing distances should be minimized • Transit facility and operation improvements should be encouraged July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 3 of 356 Sustainable Mobility Plan The city’s Sustainable Mobility Plan includes specific guidance on the consideration of roundabouts for intersection traffic control. It states, “The City of Carlsbad recognizes that roundabouts are an effective intersection traffic control measure to calm traffic and improve safety of intersections for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles by reducing speeds and conflict points. Roundabouts have added benefits of improving efficiency of vehicle operations of intersections, reducing greenhouse gas emissions from idling vehicles and enhancing aesthetics. Roundabouts will be considered on existing city streets where they could effectively address safety or traffic operations issues or in new development projects when intersection control is being considered…” Climate Action Plan All California cities are required to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. The City of Carlsbad’s strategy to meet this goal is detailed in its Climate Action Plan. The Climate Action Plan identifies transportation as the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the city. To reduce these emissions, the plan calls for encouraging more walking and biking and reducing vehicle speeds. Roundabouts, with their continual, slow-moving traffic, produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions than traffic signals. City Engineering Standards The city’s Engineering Standards include the study of roundabouts in Volume 1, Chapter 3 – Public Street and Traffic Standards under Section 3.1: C. Intersections may require special design and the study shall conform with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices … Section 4C.01b and 01c regarding intersection control. An engineering study shall include consideration of a roundabout (yield control). If a roundabout is determined to provide a viable and practical solution, it shall be studied in lieu of, or in addition to a traffic control signal. State of emergency Traffic safety is a top priority in the city. On Aug. 23, 2022, the city declared a local emergency following a more than 200% increase in collisions involving bikes and e-bikes since 2019. The City Council approved $2 million in emergency funding and asked staff to prioritize projects that would redesign streets to encourage safer behaviors. Traffic data analysis Staff evaluated a traffic signal option and a roundabout option for the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue to determine which option performed better based on specific metrics. The results of the intersection traffic control evaluation are provided in the Alternatives Analysis provided as Exhibit 3 and the Mobility Analysis provided as Exhibit 4. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 4 of 356 Less traffic delay for roundabout option Staff conducted studies to project the average time vehicles would wait at the intersection during peak hours under three scenarios: • The existing conditions, which serves as the baseline • The expected conditions, which consider traffic generated by other projects in the area • The expected conditions in 2035, which consider traffic growth projections from the San Diego Association of Governments’ Regional Transportation Demand Model Under all three scenarios during all three peak periods, the roundabout option resulted in the shortest delay for drivers. This means traffic will move more efficiently through the roundabout compared to the intersection with a traffic signal, even during the highest levels of traffic and with a high number of pedestrians and bicyclists. As the chart above shows, the roundabout would cause shorter delays for drivers under today’s conditions. During the Saturday peak hour, for example, the traffic signal would cause an average delay of 30.3 seconds per vehicle. With the roundabout option, during a Saturday peak hour, drivers would encounter on average, a 13.2-second delay, which results in a 57% reduction in delay. The traffic signal option, on the other hand, would increase the number of crosswalks at the intersection from two to four, which would increase the amount of time drivers have to be stopped to wait for pedestrians. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 5 of 356 Efficiency during peak hours and other times of the day The peak hours of the day represent about 20% of the daily traffic: 7:45 a.m. to 8:45 a.m., 4 p.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 11:45 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. on Saturdays. A traffic signal halts traffic even during non-peak hours as it cycles through red and green lights for each direction of travel. Roundabouts allow for a steadier traffic flow, because they can accommodate heavy traffic during peak hours and also allow traffic to pass through efficiently without stopping during non-peak hours. Traffic safety Roundabouts keep people moving at lower and more consistent speeds, which greatly reduces the risk of injury. According to the Transportation Research Board, which is a part of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, roundabouts have been found to provide: • More than a 90% reduction in fatalities • 67% reduction in injuries • 35% reduction in all crashes • Slower speeds that are generally safer for pedestrians The Federal Highway Administration reports that roundabouts reduce the frequency and severity of crashes by: • Eliminating the most severe types of crashes: high-angle movements including right- angle, left-turn and head-on collisions • Decreasing relative speeds approaching and through the intersection. Lower speed is associated with better yielding rates and reduced vehicle stopping distance • Minimizing the difference in speed between road users • Shortening the pedestrian crossing distances and having pedestrians cross only one direction of traffic at a time at each approach • Decreasing vehicle-to-vehicle, pedestrian-to-vehicle and bicycle-to-vehicle conflict points Environmental benefits - fewer idling vehicles By reducing vehicle idling time at the intersections, roundabouts provide the additional advantage of reducing vehicle emissions and fuel consumption, which helps improve local air quality and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. • Roundabouts on La Jolla Boulevard in the City of San Diego’s Bird Rock neighborhood are estimated to each save 20,000 gallons of gasoline annually, avoiding 9.9 pounds of particulate pollution2 • A single roundabout can eliminate 189 metric tons of what are known as carbon dioxide equivalent emissions annually, equivalent to taking 37 cars off the road 3 2Silva-Send, Nilmini (2009) Reducing Greenhouse Gases from On-Road Transportation in San Diego County. Energy Policy Initiatives Center, University of San Diego. 3 US Environmental Protection Agency, (2008) Average Annual Emissions and Fuel Consumption for Gasoline- Fueled Passenger Cars and Light Trucks. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 6 of 356 • Installing roundabouts in place of traffic signals or stop signs has been found to reduce carbon monoxide emissions by 15%-45%, nitrous oxide emissions by 21%-44%, carbon dioxide emissions by 23%-34% and hydrocarbon emissions by up to 40% 4 More space to walk and bike along the coast For coastal and identity streets, the General Plan Mobility Element calls for: • Sidewalks adjacent to residential uses, modified/new sidewalks should be a minimum of six feet in width. Elsewhere, such as the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue, modified/new sidewalks should be a minimum of eight feet in width Sidewalk north of Tamarack Ave Sidewalk south of Tamarack Ave Bike lane Bike lane buffers Current 5 feet 5 feet 5 to 7 ½ feet 0 to 2-foot buffer Traffic signal option 5 feet 9 to 16 feet 6 to 8 feet 0 to 3-foot buffer Roundabout option 10 feet 14 to 16 feet 7 to 8 feet 3-foot buffer 4 Public opinion, traffic performance, the environment, and safety after the construction of double-lane roundabouts, Wen Hu, Anne T. McCartt, Jessica S.Jermakian, Srinivas Mandavilli, Transportation Research Record 2402 Truck and Bus Safety. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 7 of 356 Renderings of proposed traffic signal and roundabout options July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 8 of 356 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 9 of 356 Traffic & Mobility Commission When staff first presented the project design options to the Traffic & Mobility Commission on Feb. 6, 2023, the commission did not reach consensus on the preferred intersection design option. (The minutes of that meeting are provided as Exhibit 5.) The commission voted on April 3, 2023, to put the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements Project on its May agenda with the goal of providing a recommendation to the City Council. The second presentation to the Traffic & Mobility Commission on May 1, 2023, resulted in a unanimous vote to recommend the roundabout option (6/0/1, with one commissioner absent), as shown in Exhibit 6, the minutes of that meeting. Community Engagement Starting in 2016, staff have been gathering input from the community on this project. This included: • Direct communication and meetings with residents and business owners in the area: o Owner of the seafood and steakhouse restaurant at the northeast corner of the Tamarack Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard intersection o Homeowners along Tamarack Avenue, Sequoia Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard o Homeowners and residents of the condominiums at the southeast corner of the Tamarack Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard intersection • A pop-up information booth along the upper seawall during times of peak activity • A community-wide online survey City staff have also worked with staff with the California Coastal Commission and California State Parks throughout the planning process for this project. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 10 of 356 Common questions Community members have raised several questions about this project: How does a roundabout work in areas with high pedestrian use? • With roundabouts, pedestrians need to cross shorter distances at a time – 17 feet for the roundabout compared to 66 feet for the signalized intersection–and traffic going in only one direction • Pedestrians have direct crossing paths from each corner of the roundabout • Unlike a crosswalk across a traffic signal intersection, when pedestrians cross a roundabout, traffic on the opposite side can continue flowing • Cars are forced to slow down to about 15 mph to 25 mph to navigate the roundabout, making pedestrians much safer. Speed is the No. 1 cause of injury collisions Will heavy pedestrian use cause cars to back up? The roundabout would be built with the option to have signals for all directions of traffic, meaning certain movements can be paused to clear the intersection and keep traffic flowing. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 11 of 356 How would a roundabout handle the cars coming and leaving the Tamarack State Beach parking lot? To support peak entry and exit times, the roundabout option would include a metering signal at the entry of the parking lot with sensors that can tell if cars are getting backed up, which could also be designed to indicate when the lot is full Can large fire trucks and other emergency vehicles navigate the roundabout? • Yes, the roundabouts will be designed with public safety needs in mind • A roundabout at this intersection is supported by the city’s Fire Department How would people get used to such a big change at this intersection? Is it too big of a change? • The City Council has already put policies in place that will change the entire length of Carlsbad Boulevard to reduce speeding, make more room for walking and biking along the coast and increase beach access. As more sections are redesigned, the changes will be very cohesive • The city’s first roundabout on Carlsbad Boulevard is north of the project site at State Street and operates efficiently and effectively with multimodal traffic including vehicle volumes up to 19,600 • The City Council approved another roundabout at the intersection of Cannon Road and Carlsbad Boulevard, south of Tamarack Avenue, and the design for the roundabout is at approximately 90% complete • Roundabouts are also among the options proposed on south Carlsbad Boulevard between Manzano Drive to Island Way, which were approved as the preferred option by the City Council on June 20, 2023, and supported by the Traffic & Mobility Commission on June 5, 2023, and the Beach Preservation Commission on June 6, 2023 How would bikes navigate the roundabout? • The city has worked closely with the biking community in designing the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue roundabout • Cyclists will have two options. Because people drive slowly through roundabouts, cyclists can merge into the lane and proceed through the roundabout, if they feel comfortable doing so, or they can take one of the shared-use paths at all four corners of the intersection • To make sure bikers enter the shared-use path at slower speeds from the bike lane, bike path entrances are designed at a 45-degree angle and are five feet wide How will visitors know what to do with a roundabout? • Roundabouts are becoming more common overall and are utilized in many communities with large numbers of tourists, such as Encinitas, Del Mar, La Jolla, San Diego, Santa Cruz, San Clemente, San Juan Capistrano and Sedona • When people are unfamiliar with how to use them, they tend to slow down and proceed more cautiously • Because the other cars in the roundabout are already moving slowly, this does not tend to affect traffic flow • Pedestrians and cyclists unfamiliar with roundabouts tend to use the signs and follow others when going through a roundabout July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 12 of 356 What would happen if Interstate 5 is blocked with traffic? Will people be able to use the coast as an alternate route? • If this were to happen, a roundabout would not cause a greater delay than a traffic signal or existing conditions and could even help facilitate a steady flow of traffic • The roundabout option will result in less delay for all users • Use of El Camino Real is another option; it already handles a large volume of traffic, and the traffic signals can be adjusted during an emergency to help keep north-south traffic moving Fiscal Analysis There is no immediate, nor direct fiscal impact from selecting an intersection control design option for Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue. In March 2022, the City Council approved a professional services agreement with Wood Rodgers, Inc. to provide engineering design and environmental services for the project. Advancement to final design and environmental review is already included in Wood Rodgers, Inc.’s approved scope of services. Most of the funding for the project design comes from the Active Transportation Grant Program, administered by SANDAG. The estimated cost for construction will be determined once the project moves to final engineering design. Options Staff provide the following options for the City Council’s consideration: 1. Adopt a resolution approving a roundabout as the preferred intersection traffic control option at the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection, along with improvements and authorizing staff to move forward with the environmental review, permitting and final engineering design of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements Project, Capital Improvement Program Project No. 6058 (Exhibit 1) Pros • This option is the most consistent with the City Council policies related to traffic safety mobility and environmental sustainability • Data show roundabouts are much safer than signalized intersections by reducing vehicle conflict points with other vehicles, pedestrians and bicycles as well as reducing vehicular speeds • The roundabout most efficiently accommodates future traffic flow for horizon year 2035 and reduces delay • The roundabout minimizes future infrastructure maintenance needs and long- term costs • The roundabout will result in less air pollution and electricity usage • The roundabout will greatly decrease noise from motorcycles and other loud vehicles along the coast Cons • Roundabouts are relatively new to Carlsbad, and some community members have expressed serious concerns July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 13 of 356 • While the data does not support these concerns, some residents feel strongly that roundabouts are not good for Carlsbad in general or for this intersection in particular 2. Adopt a resolution approving a traffic signal as the preferred intersection traffic control option at the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection, along with improvements and authorizing staff to move forward with the environmental review, permitting and final engineering design of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements Project, Capital Improvement Program Project No. 6058 (Exhibit 2) Pros • This option adequately meets the City Council policies related to traffic safety mobility and environmental sustainability • Enhances safety slightly compared to the existing conditions • The traffic signal satisfactorily accommodates future traffic flow for horizon year 2035 • Drivers are more accustomed to traffic signals Cons • Does not best meet the City Council-approved policies of the city’s Mobility Element of the General Plan, Sustainable Mobility Plan and Climate Action Plan • Does not enhance safety as well as the roundabout option • Does not provide the best long-term financial savings • Does not reduce greenhouse gas emissions as much as the roundabout option • Does not reduce electricity use • Noise from motorcycles and other loud vehicles along the coast would continue at present levels or increase Staff recommend Option 1 for the City Council’s approval. Next Steps Upon the City Council’s selection of a preferred design option for the intersection, staff will complete the environmental review and permitting and final engineering design. Once the environmental permitting and engineering design phases are complete, staff will return to the Traffic & Mobility Commission in mid-2025 to request its support of staff’s final engineering design and subsequently to the City Council to request its approval of the plans, specifications and contract documents and authorization to advertise for construction bids. If construction starts in late 2025, the project could be completed by late 2026; however, the ultimate timing is contingent upon coordination with State Parks, completing environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act and obtaining a coastal development permit. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 14 of 356 Environmental Evaluation This action to receive a presentation and approve a preferred traffic control design option does not constitute a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act under Public Resources Code section 21065 in that it has no potential to cause either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. The direction provided by City Council does not have a legally binding effect on future discretionary actions to approve the project. Public input received and technical information prepared will be used during the planning and environmental evaluation process. Exhibits 1.City Council resolution to approve a roundabout as traffic control option 2.City Council resolution to approve a traffic signal as the traffic control option 3.Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 4.Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 5.Traffic & Mobility Commission Feb. 6, 2023, meeting minutes (on file in the office of the City Clerk) 6.Traffic & Mobility Commission May 1, 2023, meeting minutes (on file in the office of the City Clerk) July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 15 of 356 RESOLUTION NO. 2023-206 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND TAMARACK AVENUE AS THE PREFERRED INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CONTROL OPTION AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, PERMITTING AND FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND TAMARACK AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has determined that it is necessary, desirable, and in the public interest to make improvements to the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection, Capital Improvement Program Project No. 6058, or Project; and WHEREAS, a roundabout and additional improvements as a part of this project would enhance coastal access, improve walking and biking infrastructure, and improve traffic flow along Carlsbad's coastline; and WHEREAS, the project team has completed conceptual design options, traffic technical studies, and is ready to move forward with completing the environmental review, permitting and final engineering for the Project; and WHEREAS, advancement to final design and environmental review is already included in the consultant's approved scope of services, so no additional funding is needed at this time; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has determined that this action does not constitute a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act under Public Resources Code Section 21065. It has no potential to cause either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and therefore does not require environmental review. The direction provided by City Council to select a preferred traffic control design option does not have a legally binding effect on future discretionary actions to approve the project. Public input received and technical information prepared will be used during the planning and environmental evaluation process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1.That the above recitations are true and correct. 2.That the City Council approves a roundabout at the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection, as the preferred intersection traffic control design option, subject Exhibit 1 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 16 of 356 to staff returning to the City Council within five months of completion of the Cannon Road and Carlsbad Boulevard roundabout with data on the performance of the Cannon Road and Carlsbad Boulevard roundabout for the City Council to reevaluate and determine if changes are needed to the design of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue roundabout, or to pursue other options for this intersection. 3.That staff is authorized to move forward with environmental review, permitting, and final engineering for the selected design option of a roundabout for the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements P�oject, Capital Improvement Program Project No. 6058. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the 18th day of !!!!Y, 2023, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Bhat-Patel, Acosta, Luna. Blackburn, Burkholder. None. None. r l KEITH BLACKBURN, Mayor SHERRY FREISINGER, City Clerk (SEAL) \\\\\\\1\111111/f/ ... �'''<- C A 1111'11 .:f o� ...... R(. ,,,,, � � ... � . ..s' ,,,_ ff!::, ..... � ···· .. � f-> t �\ 0 3\ ·-��"W�_; t �,,,p4·1..·•.::::·:·r::.��� f 11111,,11 IFO'r-\�,,,,,,-$' '111111111\\\\\\\\\ July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 17 of 356 Exhibit 2 RESOLUTION NO. . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION OF CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND TAMARACK AVENUE AS THE PREFERRED INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CONTROL OPTION AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, PERMITTING AND FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN OF THE CARLSBAD BOULEVARD AND TAMARACK AVENUE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California has determined that it is necessary, desirable, and in the public interest to make improvements to the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection, Capital Improvement Program, or CIP, Project No. 6058, or Project; and WHEREAS, a traffic signal and additional improvements as a part of this project would enhance coastal access, improve walking and biking infrastructure, and improve traffic flow along Carlsbad’s coastline; and WHEREAS, the project team has completed conceptual design options, traffic technical studies, and is ready to move forward with completing the environmental review, permitting and final engineering for the Project; and WHEREAS, advancement to final design and environmental review is already included in the consultant’s approved scope of services, so no additional funding is needed at this time; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has determined that this action does not constitute a project within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act under Public Resources Code Section 21065. It has no potential to cause either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and therefore does not require environmental review. The direction provided by City Council to select a preferred traffic control design option does not have a legally binding effect on future discretionary actions to approve the project. Public input received and technical information prepared will be used during the planning and environmental evaluation process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Carlsbad, California, as follows: 1.That the above recitations are true and correct. 2.That the City Council approves a traffic signal at the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection, as the preferred intersection traffic control design option. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 18 of 356 3. That staff is authorized to move forward with environmental review, permitting, and final engineering for the selected design option of a traffic signal for the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvements Project, CIP Project No. 6058. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Carlsbad on the __ day of ________, 2023, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ______________________________________ KEITH BLACKBURN, Mayor ______________________________________ SHERRY FREISINGER, City Clerk (SEAL) July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 19 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 1 of 27 To: Lauren Ferrell, PE, QSD/P - City of Carlsbad Cc: Nathan Schmidt - City of Carlsbad Scott Lyle - City of Carlsbad From: Melissa Gomez, PE Date: January 24, 2023 Subject: Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis INTRODUCTION This memorandum has been prepared to present an Alternatives Analysis for the proposed Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project located in the City of Carlsbad, California. This analysis evaluates four (4) project alternatives: ·No Build Alternative ·Alternative 1 – Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative ·Alternative 2 – Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative ·Alternative 3 – Roundabout Intersection Alternative The results of this analysis are based on the city-approved Mobility Analysis, dated December 2, 2022. PROJECT GOALS AND OBJECTIVES As determined by the project development team, the City of Carlsbad, and the stakeholders of this project, the goal of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project is to accommodate all modes of transportation and improve beach access while promoting active transportation improvements and speed management at this heavily traveled segment of Carlsbad Blvd to make it safer for all modes of users. The city council aims to become a leader in multimodal transportation systems, implementing creative approaches to moving people and goods through and within Carlsbad to enhance Carlsbad’s coastline and ensure an exceptional experience in all the ways people want to enjoy it. The goal of the project is to also close a critical gap in the transportation network by improving the bicycle, pedestrian, and transit environment on Carlsbad Boulevard, thus promoting alternative modes as viable forms of transportation, and improving safety for users that choose those alternative modes. The project improvements provide operational enhancements for vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, and riders consistent with the city’s General Plan Mobility Element and Climate Action Plan. Improvement features will include: ·Reconfiguration of the intersection to ease traffic flow ·Widening of the sidewalk, including to the south across the bridge ·Relocating the North County Transit District bus stops to provide safer access ·Improving pedestrian and bike facilities Visit https://www.carlsbadca.gov/departments/public-works/projects/our-coastline/tamarack-area- coastal-project for project status updates and information. Exhibit 3 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 20 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 2 of 27 EXISTING CONDITIONS STUDY INTERSECTION This analysis focuses on the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue. The project location and study limits are shown in Figure 1. Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue is currently a signalized intersection with 10-foot-wide pedestrian crosswalks on the north and east legs. There is a 4-foot-wide pedestrian refuge island through the north leg crossing. The sidewalk has visible cracks and spalling with minor settlement and uplift in some areas. The northbound and southbound approaches currently include protected left-turn phasing and the eastbound and westbound approaches include split phasing. The study area consists of the following roadway segments that make up the four approaches of the study intersection: Carlsbad Boulevard: A four-lane roadway that runs north-south between the city limits. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour (mph) north of Tamarack Avenue and 35 mph south of Tamarack Avenue. Based on the City of Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element (Mobility Element), Carlsbad Boulevard is designated as an Identity Street north of Tamarack Avenue and as a Coastal Street south of Tamarack Avenue. The southbound approach of the study intersection includes two through lanes, a southbound left-turn pocket, and a signal-controlled channelized southbound right-split lane. The northbound approach includes two through lanes and a northbound left-turn pocket. Tamarack Avenue: Within the study area, Tamarack Avenue is a two-lane roadway with a two-way left- turn lane that generally runs east-west between Carlsbad Boulevard and College Boulevard. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour (mph) west of Skyline Road and 35 mph east of Skyline Road. Tamarack Avenue forms the westbound approach of the study intersection and contains one shared through-right turn lane and a left-turn pocket. Based on the Mobility Element, Tamarack Avenue is designated as a Neighborhood Connector Street. Beach Access Road: The Beach Access Road is a local access road that provides access to the Tamarack State Beach parking lot, owned and operated by California Department of Parks and Recreation, State Parks. There is no posted speed on this road, however, speeds can be assumed to be 25 mph or less. The Beach Access Road forms the eastbound approach to the study intersection and contains a shared through- left turn lane, and a stop-controlled channelized right-turn lane. ADJACENT INTERSECTIONS Redwood Avenue: Redwood Avenue is a two-lane east-west local roadway that forms a full access side- street stop-controlled intersection with Carlsbad Boulevard approximately 300 feet north of Tamarack Avenue. Redwood Avenue is designated as a “village street” in the Mobility Element. Sequoia Avenue: Sequoia Avenue is a two-lane east-west local roadway that forms a full access side-street stop-controlled intersection with Carlsbad Boulevard approximately 300 feet south of Tamarack Avenue. Sequoia Avenue is designated as a “local/neighborhood street” in the Mobility Element. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 21 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 3 of 27 Figure 1. Project Location July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 22 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 4 of 27 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND TRANSIT FACILITIES Existing Pedestrian Facilities Within the study area, sidewalks exist along both sides of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue. Sidewalk along the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard south of Tamarack Avenue is 4 to 5-feet-wide and buffered by a guardrail. Sidewalk along the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard north of Tamarack Avenue is 8- feet-wide buffered by a landscaped area. The Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue intersection contains pedestrian crosswalks with push buttons, countdown signal heads, curb ramps on the north and east legs of the intersection, and the Agua Hedionda trail head and Coastal Rail Trail facilities in the nearby vicinity. Existing Bicycle Facilities The City of Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element and Carlsbad Bikeway Master Plan references three (3) bikeway facility types, consistent with Caltrans definitions, as follows: · Class I Bikeway (bike path) – provides a separated corridor that is not served by streets and highways and is away from the influence of parallel streets. Class I bikeways are for non-vehicle use only with opportunities for direct access and recreational benefits, right-of-way for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians, and cross flow conflicts are minimized. · Class II Bikeway (bike lane) – provides a delineated right-of-way assigned to bicyclists to enable more predictable movements, accommodating bicyclists through corridors where insufficient room exists for side-by-side sharing of existing streets by motorists and bicyclists. · Class III Bikeway (bike route) – shared facility that serves either continuity to other bicycle facilities or designates preferred routes through high demand corridors. Class II bikeways (bike lanes) exist on the following facilities: · Northbound and southbound Carlsbad Boulevard within the study area. · Eastbound and westbound Tamarack Avenue within the study area. Existing Transit Facilities Transit in the City of Carlsbad includes North County Transit District (NCTD) transit service, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) paratransit service, the COASTER commuter rail, and Amtrak rail service. Bus stops exist within the immediate study area on northbound Carlsbad Boulevard, approximately 170 feet north of Tamarack Avenue, and on southbound Carlsbad Boulevard within the porkchop island on the west leg of the intersection. Both stops contain signage and benches, however, there are currently no ADA- compliant pedestrian facilities providing access to the stop on southbound Carlsbad Boulevard. The bus stops are serviced by Route 101 of the NCTD (referred to as the “BREEZE”). Currently, Route 101 provides service along Highway 101 between Oceanside Transit Center in Oceanside and UTC Transit Center in San Diego. Service is provided seven days a week with approximately 30-minute headways throughout the day and hourly headways in the evenings. CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVES PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES This analysis studies the following four project alternatives: No Build Alternative: This alternative presents a baseline condition in which no improvements would be made to the study intersection and corridor. Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: As seen on the attached Alternative 1 exhibit, this alternative represents a signalized condition in which the following improvements would be made: July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 23 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 5 of 27 · New striping along Carlsbad Boulevard between Hemlock Avenue and just south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge, along Tamarack Avenue approximately 175 feet east of Carlsbad Boulevard, and along the Beach Access Road approximately 100 feet west of Carlsbad Boulevard. · Addition of high visibility pedestrian crossings on all four legs of the study intersection and on the east leg of the Carlsbad Boulevard & Sequoia Avenue intersection. · Addition of green bike lane conflict zone striping that highlights the presence of bicyclists. · Bulb-outs/curb extensions with directional curb ramps at the southeast corner of Carlsbad Boulevard/Tamarack Ave intersection and east leg of the Carlsbad Boulevard/Sequoia Avenue intersection. · A parking lane and pull-out bus stop alongside a buffered bike lane on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard north of Tamarack Avenue. · A pull-out bus stop on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard south of Tamarack Avenue alongside a bike lane. · 6-ft bike lane without a buffer on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard north of Tamarack Avenue to Hemlock Avenue. · 6-ft bike lane with a 2-ft buffer on both sides of the bike lane (with adjacent on-street parking) on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard north of Tamarack Avenue. · 6-ft bike lane without a buffer on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard south of Tamarack Avenue for approximately 420 feet which then transitions to an 8-ft bike lane with a 3-ft buffer as it continues south, ending south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge. · 6-ft bike lane without a buffer on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue, followed by a 6-ft bike lane with a 2-ft buffer south of Sequoia Avenue to the project limits south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge. · 7-ft bike lane on both sides of Tamarack Avenue · 10-ft western sidewalk to the north of Tamarack Avenue provided for the length of the proposed bus stop only, as there is already an existing meandering sidewalk that would remain in place. · Existing 5-ft eastern sidewalk would remain in place to the north of Tamarack Avenue. · 9-ft western sidewalk to the south of Tamarack Avenue, which would then widen to 11 feet to the south followed by a maximum 15.5-ft width on the bridge. · 10-ft eastern sidewalk between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue followed by a 5 to 6-ft eastern sidewalk south of Sequoia Avenue. · A new signalized midblock pedestrian crossing on Carlsbad Boulevard approximately 680 feet south of the study intersection with ADA curb ramps. · New directional ADA curb ramps at all pedestrian crossings within the study intersection and on the east leg of the Carlsbad Boulevard & Sequoia Avenue intersection. All other curb ramps at adjacent intersections would remain protected in place. · One 10.5-ft to 11-ft through lane and one 10.5-ft to 11-ft through-right lane in the northbound direction · One 10-ft to 10.5-ft through lane and one 10-ft to 10.5-ft through-right lane in the southbound direction · A single 10-ft northbound and southbound exclusive left-turn lane · 11-ft through lanes on Tamarack Avenue in both eastbound and westbound directions · 11-ft left-turn lane on Tamarack Avenue · Exclusive and separated 20-ft right-turn lane from Beach Access Road to southbound Carlsbad Boulevard, separated by a median with a Caltrans Type C Island Passageway. · A single through and receiving lane on the Beach Access Road of varying widths July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 24 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 6 of 27 · Removal of the southbound channelized right-split lane and conversion of one southbound through lane to a shared-through right lane. · Reduction of southbound Carlsbad Boulevard to one lane just north of the proposed midblock crossing with the merge taper beginning approximately 420 feet south of the Carlsbad Blvd/Tamarack Ave intersection. · Signal modification to include pedestrian phases for the west and south legs. The signal is assumed to remain actuated uncoordinated. Under the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative, the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Redwood Avenue would remain full-access, however, the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Sequoia Avenue would be converted to right-in/right-out only. Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative: As seen on the attached Alternative 2 exhibit, this alternative represents a signalized condition that consists of almost all the improvements included in the Signalized 3- Lane Intersection Alternative but omits the lane reduction on southbound Carlsbad Boulevard south of Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad Boulevard would remain a 4-lane corridor throughout the project limits. Due to the inclusion of the 4th lane, the western sidewalk to the south of Tamarack Avenue, would widen to a maximum 11-ft width to the south. Additionally, the southbound bike lane south of Tamarack Avenue would be 6 feet wide without a buffer. All other lane, sidewalk, and bike lane widths would remain the same as the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative. Roundabout Intersection Alternative: As seen on the attached Alternative 3 exhibit, this alternative proposes many improvements similar to the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative but with additional buffered bike lanes, wider sidewalks, and would construct a single lane roundabout at the study intersection. In the southbound direction, a lane would be dropped starting just south of Cherry Avenue and would open back to two through lanes south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge. In the northbound direction, a lane would be dropped south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge and would open back to two through lanes north of Hemlock Avenue. This alternative proposes the following additional differentiators from the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: · An additional high visibility crosswalk on the east leg of Redwood Avenue. · ADA directional curb ramps at all pedestrian crossings within the roundabout · 8-ft bike lane with a 3-ft buffer on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard north of Tamarack Avenue to Hemlock Avenue. · 8-ft bike lane with a 3-ft buffer on both sides (with adjacent on-street parking) on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard north of Tamarack Avenue. · 8-ft bike lane with a 3-ft buffer on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard south of Tamarack Avenue. Figure 2. Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative Cross-Section Looking South on Carlsbad Boulevard July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 25 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 7 of 27 · 7-ft bike lane with a 3-ft buffer on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue, followed by an 8-ft bike lane with a 3-ft buffer south of Sequoia Avenue to the project limits south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge. · 10-ft western sidewalk to the north of Tamarack Avenue. Existing meandering sidewalk would remain in place. · 9.2 to 10-ft eastern sidewalks to the north of Tamarack Avenue. · 14-ft western sidewalk to the south of Tamarack Avenue, which would then widen to 16 feet to the south followed by a 15-ft sidewalk width on the bridge. · 10-ft eastern sidewalk between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue followed by an 11-ft eastern sidewalk south of Sequoia Avenue, which widens to 14 feet to the south followed by a 13-ft sidewalk width on the bridge. · 10.5-ft to 11-ft single through lane on southbound Carlsbad Boulevard, which would then widen as it approaches the roundabout. · 11-ft single through lane on northbound Carlsbad Boulevard, which would then widen as it approaches the roundabout. · 17-ft single lane within the roundabout. · Truck apron interior circle of the roundabout. · Additional truck apron in the southeast corner of the roundabout. · 10-ft medians on Carlsbad Boulevard both north and south of the roundabout. · 11-ft eastbound through lane and westbound through lane on Tamarack Ave, each of which would widen as it approaches the roundabout. · 11.5-ft eastbound lane and 10-ft westbound lane within the Beach Access Road, each of which would widen as it approaches the roundabout. · Exclusive and separated 22-ft right-turn lane from Beach Access Road to southbound Carlsbad Boulevard, separated by a median with a Caltrans Type C Island Passageway. · Varying width medians on Tamarack Avenue and the Beach Access Road. · Additional landscaping around roundabout perimeter. · The intersection improvements will include conduit to facilitate each leg and pedestrian crossings could be signalized in the future as needed to address operational issues. This alternative assumes installation of a metering signal on the eastbound approach (west leg) with queue detection on the northbound approach (south leg) located approximately 500 feet south of the yield line. This means the vehicles approaching the roundabout from the Beach Access Road will be metered in a similar fashion to a freeway on-ramp to ensure the queue on Carlsbad Boulevard is clearing the intersection. The intersections of Carlsbad Boulevard with Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue would Figure 3. Roundabout Intersection Alternative Cross-Section Looking South on Carlsbad Boulevard July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 26 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 8 of 27 remain full access. The three conceptual project alternatives are shown in Appendix A. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PROCESS This section details the alternatives and criteria to meet the goals defined by the City of Carlsbad and all modes of transportation needs in a multi-step screening process as shown in the figure below. PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND TRANSIT ENHANCEMENTS One of the main goals of this project is to enhance the public facilities provided for pedestrians and bicyclists. For pedestrians, this means creating wide and spacious sidewalks for pedestrians to both walk alongside each other while also being able to stop and admire the coastline. Implementing curb extension at the corners of the intersection will enhance pedestrian safety by increasing pedestrian visibility and slowing vehicles. Curb extensions increase overall visibility by aligning pedestrians with the parking lane and by reducing the crossing distance for pedestrians. By physically and visually narrowing the roadway, vehicles are encouraged to slow down. For bicyclists, this means providing bike lanes with buffers to separate bicyclists from vehicular traffic for an added level of safety. When the bike lane runs adjacent to the on-street parking, a buffer between the parking lane and the bike lane is also preferred. Bike lane widths should be a minimum of 6 feet, but 8 feet is preferred to provide bicyclists with plenty of space to ride without providing so much width that a motor vehicle could mistake the bike lane for a traffic lane. For transit, this means providing near-side pull-out bus stop configurations. Near-side pull out stops benefit traffic flow by not blocking the through lane while buses are stopped at the station. Safety is also improved since transit riders come from the font, which is more visible to the transit operator. Pedestrian enhancements will also benefit transit users, as wider sidewalks provide additional space for waiting riders in addition to space for bus stop amenities. To evaluate the pedestrian and bicycle enhancements, the Mobility Analysis performed for this project determined the Multimodal Level of Service (MMLOS) for pedestrians and bicyclists. MMLOS provides a qualitative “grade” assigned to specified travel modes, ranging from a LOS A to LOS F. As outlined in the city’s General Plan, LOS A reflects a high service standard for a travel mode (e.g., outstanding Figure 4. Alternatives Analysis Process Evaluation Criteria · Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements · Traffic Impacts & Performance · Environmental Constraints · Safety · Beach Access · Aesthetics July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 27 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 9 of 27 characteristics and experience for that mode) and LOS F reflects a poor service standard for a travel mode (e.g. congestion for vehicles, no bicycle, pedestrian, or transit facilities, etc.) MMLOS evaluates the safety and quality of access and mobility for pedestrian, bicyclist, and transit users using methods documented in the Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element, Chapter 3. The City of Carlsbad MMLOS Tool takes into account inputs such as sidewalk and bike lane widths, speed limit, presence of pedestrian and bike lane buffers, and speed management features such as bulb-outs and high visibility crosswalks. Per Policy 3-P.4 in the General Plan Mobility Element, the study area pedestrian and bicycle facilities should maintain LOS D or better. As published in Table 3-1 of the city’s General Plan, Transit is not subject to a MMLOS standard. Pedestrian and Bicycle MMLOS for the three main approaches of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection, as well as the segment of Carlsbad Boulevard between Sequoia Avenue and the south end of the bridge, were evaluated for all alternatives under Existing conditions. Cumulative and Horizon Year scenario analysis was omitted because Cumulative ADT volumes showed only a very slight increase over Existing ADTs and projected Horizon Year ADTs were lower than Existing ADTs. As such, Horizon Year and Cumulative condition MMLOS results were projected to be the same as Existing MMLOS results. Pedestrian LOS for the segment of Carlsbad Boulevard between Sequoia Avenue and the south end of the bridge is better under the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative and Roundabout Alternative than under the 4-Lane Alternative, as the roadway would be narrower at the midblock crossing, allowing pedestrians to cross fewer lanes. Table 1 shows the pedestrian and bicycle scores and LOS for each direction of the study segments. As shown in Table 1, all three proposed project alternatives were found to provide notably better pedestrian LOS and similar or better bicycle LOS over No Build conditions. See Appendix D for the MMLOS Worksheets used to determine these results. In addition to the MMLOS analysis, it should be noted that each alternative provides different pedestrian and bicycle facilities. As noted in the alternative descriptions, these are: · Pedestrian Facilities: o No Build Alternative – Existing sidewalks are approximately 5 to 6 feet wide throughout the project area, except on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard south of Tamarack Avenue where the sidewalk has metal beam guardrail followed by a barrier along the bridge, which shrinks the sidewalk to 4 to 5 feet. Additionally, there is no curb-adjacent sidewalk on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the north of Tamarack Avenue; which instead has an offset meandering sidewalk 8 feet wide. Crosswalks exist only on the north and eastern leg of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection with a maximum crossing width of 76 feet. o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative – Proposed sidewalks on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the north of Tamarack Avenue, and on the east side to the south between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue, are 10 feet wide. The existing 5-ft sidewalk on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the north of Tamarack Avenue would remain protected in place. The proposed sidewalk on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the south of Tamarack Avenue is 9 feet minimum to 16 feet maximum. And the proposed sidewalk on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the south of Sequoia Avenue is 5 feet minimum to 6 feet maximum. Crosswalks and directional curb ramps are proposed on all legs of the intersection with a maximum crossing width of 65 feet. A Caltrans Type C Island Passageway is proposed within the median island separating the exclusive right-turn lane coming from the Beach Access Road. o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative – Proposed sidewalks are the same as the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative except on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the south of Tamarack Avenue: here they are 9 feet minimum to 11 feet maximum. Proposed crosswalks are the same as the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 28 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 10 of 27 o Roundabout Alternative – Proposed sidewalks on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the north of Tamarack Avenue, on the east side to the north between Tamarack Avenue and Redwood Avenue, and on the east side to the south between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue are 10 feet wide. On the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the north of Redwood Avenue, the proposed sidewalk is 9.2 feet wide. Proposed sidewalk on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the south of Tamarack Avenue is 14 feet minimum to 16 feet maximum. And the proposed sidewalk on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the south of Sequoia Avenue is 11 feet minimum to 14 feet maximum. Crosswalks are proposed on all legs of the roundabout with median refugee island further reducing the maximum crossing width to 22 feet. Each median refugee island includes a Caltrans Type A or B passageway. A Caltrans Type C Island Passageway is proposed within the median porkchop separating the exclusive right-turn lane coming from the Beach Access Road. · Bicycle Facilities: o No Build Alternative – The existing bike lane on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the north of Tamarack Avenue is 6.5 to 7.5 feet wide with no buffer. The existing bike lane on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the north of Tamarack Avenue is 5 to 7 feet wide with no buffer. The existing bike lane on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the south of Tamarack Avenue is approximately 7 feet wide with a 2-ft buffer that widens to a 5-ft buffer over the bridge. And the existing bike lane on the east side of Carlsbad Boulevard to the south of Tamarack Avenue is approximately 7 feet wide with a varying buffer that widens to 5 feet over the bridge. Bicyclists and vehicles have 65 potential conflict points. o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative - All 6-ft bike lanes, sometimes with 2-ft buffers and sometimes without buffers, with a 3-ft buffer for the southbound bike lane over the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge. Bicyclists and vehicles have 69 potential conflict points. o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative – All 6-ft bike lanes, half with 2-ft buffers and half without buffers. This alternative has the same number of potential bike and vehicle conflicts as the Signalized 3-lane intersection Alternative. o Roundabout Alternative – All 8-ft bike lanes with 3-ft buffers, except alongside the adjacent parking where the bike lane is 7 feet with a 3-ft buffer on both sides. Bicyclists and vehicles have 27 potential conflict points, which is about 50% fewer conflict points compared to a signal-controlled intersection. · Transit Facilities: o No Build Alternative – The existing bus stop in the southbound direction of Carlsbad Boulevard is located within the median island refuge at the southwest corner of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection. The pedestrian access ramp is not ADA-compliant and does not connect to the pedestrian traveled path. When stopped at this station, the bus is within the 8-foot bike lane and forces bicyclists into the vehicle lane to bypass the stopped bus, introducing a major conflict point. The existing bus stop in the northbound direction is located 120 feet north of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection and located 5 feet from a driveway. The sidewalk is 5 feet wide which does not meet the minimum ramp deployment area (FHWA, 2015). When stopped at this station the bus will be within both the bike lane and vehicle lane, causing cars to stop or make unsafe maneuvers around the stopped bus. o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative – Relocates bus stops to a near side configuration. 8-ft wide bus station pull out with 80-foot-long and 10-foot-wide bus station. Along the length of the bus pull-out is a 6-foot-wide high visibility green painted bike lane with a 2-foot buffer on both sides. o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative – Same transit enhancements as Signalized 3- lane Intersection Alternative. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 29 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 11 of 27 o Roundabout Alternative – 8-ft wide bus station pull out with 80-foot-long and 10-foot-wide bus station. Along the length of the bus pull-out is a 7-ft high visibility green painted bike lane with a 3-foot buffer on both sides. Although the three proposed alternatives all provide clear enhancements to the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities compared to the No Build Alternative, the differences between the alternatives should be noted. The roundabout provides significant benefits over the two signalized alternatives, including shorter crossing distances, slower traffic speed, and lower number of potential conflict points. For sidewalk facilities, where the signalized alternatives maintain existing 5-ft sidewalks on the east side to the north of the intersection and proposed 5-ft sidewalks south of Sequoia Avenue on the east side, the roundabout replaces these with much wider 10-ft and 11 to 14-ft widths, respectively. Additionally, on the west side south of the intersection, the roundabout provides sidewalk widths between 14 to 16 feet, the signalized 3- Lane intersection alternative provides 9 to 16 feet, and the 4-lane provides 9 to 11 feet. In a populated and heavily traveled segment of a beachside location such as this, maximizing these widths is of extreme importance. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 30 of 356 Fi n a l C a r l s b a d B o u l e v a r d a n d T a m a r a c k A v e n u e I n t e r s e c t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t A l t e r n a t i v e s A n a l y s i s 12 o f 2 7 Ta b l e 1 . M M L O S R e s u l t s Se g m e n t No B u i l d Si g n a l i z e d 3 - L a n e I n t e r s e c t i o n A l t e r n a t i v e Si g n a l i z e d 4 - L a n e I n t e r s e c t i o n A l t e r n a t i v e Ro u n d a b o u t A l t e r n a t i v e Pe d e s t r i a n Bi c y c l e Pe d e s t r i a n Bi c y c l e Pe d e s t r i a n Bi c y c l e Pe d e s t r i a n Bi c y c l e NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Ca r l s b a d B l v d ( s o u t h l e g ) – Se q u o i a A v e t o T a m a r a c k A v e 45 F 5 5 E 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 9 0 A 9 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 9 0 A 9 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A Ca r l s b a d B l v d ( n o r t h l e g ) – Ta m a r a c k A v e t o R e d w o o d A v e 70 C 7 0 C 9 5 A 1 0 0 A 9 5 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 8 5 B 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A Ta m a r a c k A v e ( e a s t l e g ) – Ca r l s b a d B l v d t o G a r f i e l d S t 80 B 8 0 B 9 5 A 9 5 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 9 5 A 9 5 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 9 5 A 9 5 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 9 5 A 9 5 A Ca r l s b a d B l v d ( b r i d g e ) – Se q u o i a A v e t o s o u t h e n d o f Br i d g e 45 F 4 5 F 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 9 5 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 8 5 B 9 5 A 1 0 0 A 9 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A 1 0 0 A No t e s : So u r c e : C i t y o f C a r l s b a d M M L O S T o o l Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 31 of 35 6 Draft Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 13 of 27 TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND PERFORMANCE The Mobility Analysis performed for this project evaluated the following scenarios using the Traffic Counts included in Appendix B: • Existing Conditions: Existing traffic volumes from counts taken in May and June of 2022 on Thursday’s and Saturday’s. These traffic counts are provided in Appendix B. • Cumulative Conditions: A near-term scenario representing existing traffic volumes plus traffic projected to be generated from approved and reasonably foreseeable pending projects that are expected to influence the study area and intersection. • Horizon Year 2035 Conditions: a future year scenario based on growth found in the Transportation Forecast Information Center (TFIC) as part of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) ABM2+/2021 Regional Transportation Demand Model (RTDM). The study intersection was evaluated under the following time periods: • Typical Weekday AM peak hour • Typical Weekday PM peak hour • Summer Weekend (Saturday) midday peak hour Level of Service Traffic operations were quantified through the determination of “Level of Service” (LOS). Level of Service is a qualitative measure of traffic operating conditions, whereby a letter grade “A” through “F” is assigned to an intersection or roadway segment, representing progressively worsening traffic operations. LOS “A” represents free-flow conditions with little to no delays, while LOS “F” represents jammed or grid-lock conditions. For the Mobility Analysis performed, it was assumed that city roadways and intersections should strive to maintain LOS D or better operations during peak periods, when possible. Intersection LOS results are shown in Table 2 below for all alternatives and scenarios. As shown in Table 2, the study intersection would operate at LOS C or better under all scenarios. Table 2. Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue Intersection LOS Alternative Control Type Peak Hour Existing Cumulative Horizon Year Delay (s/veh)1 LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS2 Delay (s/veh) LOS No Build Alternative Signal AM 13.9 B 13.7 B 13.3 B PM 23.7 C 24.6 C 23.6 C SAT 24.4 C 25.1 C 24.9 C Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative Signal AM 17.6 B 17.1 B 17.2 B PM 26.9 C 26.8 C 26.6 C SAT 30.3 C 30.8 C 29.8 C Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative Signal AM 17.4 B 17.8 B 17.1 B PM 26.0 C 26.9 C 25.6 C SAT 29.6 C 30.6 C 29.1 C Roundabout Intersection Alternative Roundabout AM 3.9 A 4.0 A 3.6 A PM 18.8 B 22.0 C 15.7 B SAT 13.2 B 15.5 B 12.5 B Notes: Bold values indicate LOS E or F. 1Average control delay is reported for signalized and roundabout control types. 2 Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure of traffic operating conditions, whereby a letter grade “A” through “F” July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 32 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 14 of 27 Alternative Control Type Peak Hour Existing Cumulative Horizon Year Delay (s/veh)1 LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS2 Delay (s/veh) LOS is assigned to an intersection or roadway segment, representing progressively worsening traffic operations. LOS is determined using methods documented in the Transportation Research Board Publication Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition (HCM). Queuing 95th Percentile queuing for all movements at Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue was evaluated against existing and proposed available storage space using SimTraffic for signalized intersection control and Sidra software for roundabout control. Storage space for turn lanes was based on turn pocket length and storage space for through movement was based on the distance to the nearest cross street. Table 3 below shows the 95th percentile queueing at each movement compared to the available storage length. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 33 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 15 of 27 Table 3. 95th Percentile Intersection Queueing Alternative Movement Storage (ft)1 95th Percentile Queues (ft) Existing Cumulative Horizon Year AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT No Build Alternative NBL 70 37 119 109 30 122 143 31 112 110 NBT 230 89 488 291 93 502 321 88 446 294 SBL 115 61 136 132 59 137 143 61 131 151 SBT 235 113 145 194 115 142 215 111 150 206 SBR 70 15 23 90 0 23 89 0 24 101 EBT 235 36 64 69 33 61 78 31 69 76 EBR 30 5 22 24 0 24 29 4 27 28 WBL 75 124 115 124 124 118 133 113 117 124 WBT 450 65 97 123 80 103 138 76 117 114 Signalized 3- Lane Intersection Alternative NBL 115 38 133 133 39 133 129 32 119 105 NBT 230 105 539 314 98 535 332 103 495 305 SBL 97 75 162 209 78 165 213 74 167 213 SBT 235 177 209 336 166 203 348 167 222 325 EBT 235 34 64 75 34 63 75 40 59 74 EBR 30 0 7 28 4 18 26 0 4 29 WBL 93 163 138 176 169 140 178 158 127 162 WBT 450 121 126 178 143 135 194 140 108 157 Signalized 4- Lane Intersection Alternative NBL 115 38 137 124 37 130 136 34 118 132 NBT 230 104 536 316 109 535 335 102 500 317 SBL 97 73 146 159 69 137 192 69 137 168 SBT 235 129 171 234 139 152 272 120 154 260 EBT 235 37 60 78 37 65 70 32 58 68 EBR 30 0 10 36 4 19 26 0 13 23 WBL 93 165 136 171 171 143 172 160 132 157 WBT 450 133 126 160 150 127 190 130 119 137 Roundabout Intersection Alternative NB 215 7 117 85 8 135 97 7 99 83 SB 220 44 24 109 46 25 122 41 23 106 EB 260 5 10 28 5 10 29 5 10 28 WB 450 23 25 28 24 25 75 21 22 61 Notes: Bold values indicate queues that exceed storage length. 1Storage reported is available queueing length within a turn pocket or the length of a through lane before nearest conflicting cross- street. 2 Where multiple lanes exist for one movement, queue reported is the highest for that movement. 3 Movement abbreviations are as follows: Northbound (NB), Northbound Left (NBL), Northbound Through (NBT), Southbound (SB), Southbound Left (SBL), Southbound Right (SBR), Southbound Through (SBT), Eastbound (EB), Eastbound Through (EBT), Eastbound Right (EBR), Westbound (WB), Westbound Left (WBL), Westbound Through (WBT). As shown in Table 3, under the Signalized 3-Lane and 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives, queueing would exceed the proposed turn pocket length for the northbound, southbound, and westbound left-turn movement during at least one peak hour under all scenarios. Minimum turn pocket lengths to accommodate maximum projected left-turn queues under the Signalized 3-Lane and 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives are as follows: July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 34 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 16 of 27 · Northbound Left-Turn: o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: 135 feet o 4-Lane Alternative: 140 feet  Proposed northbound left-turn queue lengths for the signalized alternatives can be maximized to 150 feet. The additional length would take some width from the western sidewalk; however, if selected this change would be implemented in final design. · Southbound Left-Turn: o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: 215 feet o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative: 195 feet  Proposed southbound left-turn queue lengths for the signalized alternatives were maximized at 97 feet. This length cannot be increased without removing access from southbound Carlsbad Boulevard to Redwood Avenue. · Westbound Left-Turn (from Tamarack Avenue): o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: 180 feet o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative: 175 feet  Proposed left-turn queue lengths for the signalized alternatives were maximized at 93 feet. This length cannot be increased without acquisition of right of way from adjacent properties. Northbound and southbound queueing are projected to exceed available storage during at least one peak hour for all scenarios under the Signalized 3-Lane and 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives. Worst-case southbound queues under the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative would be 348 feet long (back of queue would pass Redwood Avenue). Worst-case southbound queues under the 4-Lane Alternative would be 272 feet long and are projected to be better than those under the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative since the lane reduction of southbound Carlsbad Avenue south of Tamarack Avenue would not occur under this Alternative. Worst-case northbound queues are projected to be 539 feet and 536 feet long under the 3-Lane and 4-Lane Alternatives, respectively, reaching back to the northern end of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge. As the intersection of Sequoia Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard would be converted to right-in/right-out only under these Alternatives, no queueing-related improvements are recommended at the Carlsbad Boulevard & Sequoia Avenue intersection. Note that under worst-case conditions, both the northbound and southbound queues were observed to clear the intersection in one cycle. Under the Roundabout Alternative, queueing on all approaches is shown to fit within the available storage space. Eastbound (from beach parking driveway) shared left/through queueing is projected to fit within available storage under all scenarios and alternatives. Eastbound right-turn queueing is shown to slightly exceed the short, channelized right-turn pocket during the Existing Summer Saturday Peak Hour for the 4-Lane Alternative. However as there is additional storage space along the drive aisle before reaching the beach parking lot, queue storage is assumed to be adequate for this approach under all scenarios and alternatives. Queueing at Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue As part of a previous outreach, the public expressed concern for the effect of the project alternatives on queueing at the intersections of Carlsbad Boulevard with Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue. These potential queueing impacts were thus evaluated as part of the Mobility Analysis. Redwood Avenue is proposed to remain full-access under all alternatives and Sequoia Avenue is proposed to be converted to right-in/right-out only under the 3-Lane and 4-Lane Alternatives. Results showed that maximum westbound and southbound left-turn queues at Redwood Avenue would both fit within available storage space. At Sequoia Avenue, results showed that maximum westbound July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 35 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 17 of 27 queues are projected to fit within available storage space. As worst-case northbound left-turn queueing at Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue is projected to be 137 feet, there may not be enough space to retain the southbound left-turn pocket at Sequoia Avenue under the 3-Lane and 4-Lane Alternatives. Therefore, it is recommended that Sequoia Avenue operate with right-in/right-out control under the 3- Lane and 4-Lane Alternatives as proposed. Since there would be no northbound left-turn pocket at the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection under the Roundabout Alternative, there would be adequate room to provide a southbound left-turn pocket at Sequoia Avenue under the Roundabout Alternative. Maximum 95th percentile southbound left-turn queues at Sequoia Avenue are projected to be 25 feet, which fits within available storage. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS Biological Resources Early evaluation of the Biological Study Area and record searches of the surrounding areas identified disturbed coastal sage scrub habitat that exists in a small strip between Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack State Beach. There is potential for special status plant species in the project area based on the available coastal habitat types present. The No Build Alternative would result in no changes to the Biological Study Area. Each of the three build alternatives have potential to result in small, sliver impacts to adjacent habitat; however, the City of Carlsbad is committed to minimizing or avoiding impacts wherever feasible, and mitigating impacts when necessary. At this stage of the alternatives analysis, there is no substantive difference in the anticipated impacts to biological resources between the three build alternatives. Cultural Resources Review of cultural records and coordination with State Parks identified one built environmental cultural resource in the project area. State Parks has previously evaluated the Tamarack Beach Comfort Station building and determined that it should be considered eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. None of the build alternatives are expected to result in direct or indirect impacts to the Comfort Station. Additional coordination with local Native American groups and State Parks relating to the protection of cultural and historic properties will occur during the environmental document phase of the project. Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Emissions The data from the Mobility Analysis performed for this project allows for a qualitative analysis of long term air quality emissions as a result of the three build alternatives, when compared with the No Build Alternative. Vehicle emissions are generated proportionately with gasoline usage and gasoline usage is affected by changes in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Vehicle Hours Traveled (VHT). Since this is an intersection improvement project, no new trips are expected to be generated as a result of this project. Table 2 above shows that none of the proposed alternatives would result in failing Level of Service so no cut-through traffic or vehicles detouring around the intersection as a result of traffic congestion are expected. As a result, this alternatives evaluation considers that each of the four alternatives would have the same VMT. According to the US Department of Transportation Federal Highways Administration’s Roundabouts: An Informal Guide: “Roundabouts may provide environmental benefits if they reduce vehicle delay and the number and duration of stops compared with an alternative. Even when there are heavy volumes, vehicles continue to advance slowly in moving queues rather than coming to a complete stop. This may reduce noise and air quality impacts and fuel consumption significantly by reducing the number of acceleration/deceleration cycles and the time spent idling. In general, if stop or yield control is insufficient, traffic through roundabouts generates less pollution and consumes less fuel than traffic at fixed-time signalized intersections.” July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 36 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 18 of 27 VHT is directly affected by level of service and delay. When considering the three build alternatives and comparing them to the No-Build Alternative, the 3-Lane and 4-Lane Alternatives provide variation in delay depending on the turn movement and time of day. As shown in Table 3 above, some delay values show improvement, and some are worse when compared to the No Build Alternative. If these signalized alternatives are selected, additional qualitative modeling is recommended to provide a more detailed representation of changes in air quality and greenhouse gas emissions that would occur in comparison with the No Build Alternative. The Roundabout Alternative shows improvement in delay and traffic congestion across the board when compared with the No Build Alternative. As a result, all emissions generated by gasoline vehicle usage would be improved with this alternative. Furthermore, the roundabout allows the normal flow of traffic to continue moving without stopping and idling at the intersection in non- peak times, which further would reduce VHT and avoids cold starts and stops which tend to generate more emissions compared with just slowing down. Qualitatively, the roundabout is the superior build alternative from an air quality and greenhouse gas emissions standpoint. SAFETY Collisions and Conflict Points This section discusses the collision history in the vicinity of the study intersection and safety impacts of the different alternatives. Approximately fourteen years of crash data (January 2008 – July 2022) were provided by the city (included in Appendix E) to identify high collision locations and common collision characteristics. Table 4 summarizes the collisions in the study area, including the collision severity (fatal, serious injury, other visible injury, complaint of pain, and property damage only (PDO)), the collision type (broadside, sideswipe, rear-end, hit object), the cause of the collision (driving under the influence, unsafe speed, improper turning, etc.), and the modes of transportation involved in the incident (vehicle to vehicle, vehicle to bicyclist, and vehicle to pedestrian). Table 4. Project Area 2022 Crash Data Summary: Severity & Type Intersection To t a l C r a s h e s Severity Type Cause Modes Fa t a l Se r i o u s I n j u r y Ot h e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n PD O Br o a d s i d e Si d e s w i p e Re a r - E n d Hi t O b j e c t Ot h e r No t S t a t e d DU I Un s a f e S p e e d Im p r o p e r T u r n i n g Un s a f e S t a r t / B a c k i n g Tr a f f i c S i g n a l s & S i g n s Mo d e o f T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Carlsbad Boulevard & Redwood Avenue 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Veh/Veh: 2 Veh/Bike: 0 Veh/Ped: 0 Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue 11 0 0 4 5 2 1 2 5 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 Veh/Veh: 7 Veh/Bike: 1 Veh/Ped: 0 Carlsbad Boulevard & Sequoia Avenue 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Veh/Veh: 2 Veh/Bike: 0 Veh/Ped: 0 Tamarack Avenue & Garfield Street 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Veh/Veh: 1 Veh/Bike: 0 Veh/Ped: 0 Total 18 0 0 5 8 5 2 4 8 2 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 As shown in Table 4, the majority of collisions occurred at the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue. The most common type of collision was rear-end, followed by sideswipe collisions. The primary collision factors were driving under the influence, unsafe speed, improper turning, traffic signals July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 37 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 19 of 27 Figure 5. Vehicle to vehicle conflict point comparison for conventional intersection versus a single-lane approach roundabout (FHWA, 2000). and signs, and unsafe starting or backing. Implementation of speed management measures proposed in the project improvement alternatives would potentially help reduce the number of collisions caused by unsafe speed and improper turning. When comparing the safety of the three proposed alternatives, the roundabout would provide the most dynamic speed management scenario with the most reduced injury and fatality rate. According to the Transportation Research Board (TRB) (2001) and National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) (2007), the safety improvements provided by the roundabout include: · More than 90% reduction in fatalities · 67% reduction in injuries · 35% reduction in all crashes · Slower speeds are generally safer for pedestrians In addition, according to FHWA (2000) roundabouts reduce the frequency and severity of crashes by: · Eliminating the most severe types of crashes– high angle movements including right-angle, left- turn, and head on collisions. · Decreasing relative speeds approaching and through the intersection. Lower speed is associated with better yielding rates and reduced vehicle stopping distance. · Minimizing the speed differential of most road users · Shortening the pedestrian crossing distances and pedestrians only cross one direction of traffic at a time at each approach. · Decreasing vehicle to vehicle, pedestrian to vehicle, and bicycle to vehicle conflict points The frequency of crashes at an intersection is related to the number of conflict points at an intersection as well as the magnitude of conflicting flows at each conflict point. A conflict point is a location where the paths of two vehicles, a vehicle and bicycle, or a vehicle and pedestrian diverge, merge, or cross each other. Fewer conflict points means fewer opportunities for collisions. The severity of a collision is determined largely by the speed of impact and the angle of impact. The higher the angle and higher the speed, the more severe a collision. The following figures compare the conflict points from that of a conventional intersection to that of a single-lane approach roundabout intersection. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 38 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 20 of 27 Figure 7. Pedestrian to vehicle conflict point comparison for conventional intersection and single lane approach roundabout (FHWA, 2000). A pedestrian is three times more likely to die when struck at 30 mph than at 20 mph, a difference of only 10 mph in speed. Typical commuter bicyclists’ speeds are in the range of 12 to 15 mph. Therefore, the difference in speed is critical to all users. The minor additional delay or inconvenience to drivers of lower- speed roundabout designs (as compared to higher-speed roundabout designs) is a tradeoff for the Figure 6. Bicycle to vehicle conflict point comparison for conventional intersection versus a single-lane approach roundabout (FHWA, 2000). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 39 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 21 of 27 substantial safety benefit to pedestrians and bicyclists. Older drivers may benefit from the additional time to perceive, think, react, and correct for errors, as may all users (FHWA, 2000). Speed Management Methods While posted speeds will be the same for all alternatives, the roundabout provides the most effective speed management of the proposed alternatives by forcing drivers to merge to one lane in each direction followed by the smaller radius circular motion of the roundabout. Drivers must be more aware to navigate the circular motion, as they are forced to slow down. In addition, the roundabout provides the widest sidewalks for pedestrians and the most buffer areas for bike lanes. It also forces bicyclists to slow down to enter 5-foot-wide bike ramps angled at approximately 45 degrees to their direction of travel before joining with pedestrians in the sidewalk. For the bicyclists that choose to stay within the roadway and enter the roundabout with the vehicular traffic, vehicle speeds will be dropped enough that they can position themselves amongst the vehicles (in front or behind) at similar speeds. In comparison, the Signalized 3-Lane and 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives provide speed management through the use of bulb-outs/curb extensions at joining intersections as well as some widening of sidewalks and some buffers for bike lanes (similar to the existing condition). These two alternatives provide the same sidewalk and bike lane improvements throughout except in the southbound direction south of Tamarack Avenue, where space from the lane drop is given to these other facilities. This lane drop in the southbound direction provides an additional speed management measure for the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative. As vehicles merge to one lane going southbound, they may also be forced to stop at the signalized pedestrian crossing with high visibility crosswalk prior to the bridge. Although the Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative also has this crossing, the two lanes heading southbound won’t be forced to slow down prior to the pedestrian signal. The Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative is likely to produce vehicles traveling at the fastest speeds in the southbound direction. In addition, this pedestrian crossing in the Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative has the longest crossing distance of the three proposed alternatives, making it the least safe crossing of the three. In the northbound direction, the Signalized 3-Lane and 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives are the same and will therefore produce the same vehicle speeds. Both signalized alternatives, however, improve sidewalk and bicycle facilities over existing conditions, and therefore still provide a safer intersection and corridor compared to the No Build Alternative. BEACH ACCESS As discussed in the Safety section above, all three proposed build alternatives provide safety improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists, and since many will be visiting the coastline and the beach, this means a safer route for beach access as well. As noted above, all three build alternatives improve access for pedestrian and bicyclists, but the roundabout alternative provides the safest scenario of the three by: · Reducing vehicle conflicts with pedestrians and bicyclists · Reducing bike and vehicle speed differentials · Reducing vehicle speed in general within and approaching the intersection · Widening the sidewalk to increase pedestrian capacity and comfort Widening the sidewalk will in turn enhance the coastline experience and beach activities as pedestrians will feel more comfortable, reclaiming the area. The roundabout alternative allows for the most sidewalk widening, although all of the proposed alternatives offer improvements to sidewalk widths. The roadway improvements proposed with this project are being coordinated with the City of Carlsbad Beach Access Repairs Project, in which the city is working to repair access stairways, existing sidewalks, and the seawall located along Carlsbad Boulevard, between Pine Ave and Tamarack Ave, and Carlsbad State Beach. Note that the proposed improvements for the Beach Access Repairs Project do not encroach into the proposed July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 40 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 22 of 27 project limits for the subject project. However, the improvements are directly adjacent. With these two projects side-by-side, all modes of users can expect a safer experience during their visit to the coastline and Tamarack Beach upon these projects’ completion. AESTHETICS As would be expected with new construction, the three proposed alternatives would all improve the aesthetics of the corridor and subject intersection and introduce new landscape areas to offset proposed flatwork. The signalized alternatives would likely implement planters within the curb extensions/bulb-outs alongside and between each of the curb ramps. The roundabout would do the same, as well as provide a minimum 2-ft planter strip behind the curbs within the roundabout itself. There is an opportunity to provide further landscaping with potential for a large tree or piece of artwork within the center. Additionally, the roundabout would provide a clearer unobstructed coastline view and maximize the public and private vista areas with the removal of the overhead traffic signals. Although all build alternatives provide aesthetic benefits over the No Build Alternative, the roundabout would be the most charming and visually appealing alternative of the three, as depicted in the visual simulations below. These simulations include views from both north and south of the subject intersection on Carlsbad Boulevard of the proposed Signalized 3-Lane Intersection (which can be assumed to be an equal visual representation to the Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative) as well as the Roundabout Intersection Alternative. Figure 8. Visual rendering of the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative from north of Tamarack Avenue looking south on Carlsbad Boulevard. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 41 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 23 of 27 Figure 9. Visual rendering of the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative from south of Tamarack Avenue looking north on Carlsbad Boulevard. Figure 10. Visual rendering of the Roundabout Intersection Alternative from north of Tamarack Avenue looking south on Carlsbad Boulevard. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 42 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 24 of 27 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES OVERALL EVALUATION In the Mobility Analysis, the project alternatives were evaluated based on a point system associated with the lowest projected vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle LOS for each alternative, where LOS A represents 6 points, LOS B represents 5 points, LOS C represents 4 points, LOS D represents 3 points, LOS E represents 2 points, and LOS F represents 1 point. Additionally, queueing was evaluated by assigning points based on the worst-case 95th percentile queues where 0-100 feet of queueing represents 6 points, 101-200 feet represents 5 points, 201-300 feet represents 4 points, 301-400 feet represents 3 points, 401-500 feet represents 2 points, and 501+ feet represent 1 point. Table 5 provides a comparison between each alternative based on this system. As shown in Table 5, the Roundabout Alternative received the best overall score (21 points) based on vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle LOS and queueing. In addition to providing acceptable LOS and reasonable queueing, the Roundabout Alternative would also enhance the pedestrian and bicycle experience and improve safety in the study area. The second runner-up was the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative with 17 points, followed closely by the 4-lane Alternative with 16 points. Compared to the No Build Alternative at 12 points, all three build alternatives provide significant improvements compared to the existing condition. Figure 11. Visual rendering of the Roundabout Intersection Alternative from south of Tamarack Avenue looking north on Carlsbad Boulevard. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 43 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 25 of 27 Table 5. Alternatives Comparison LOS Type Points No Build Alt Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alt Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alt Roundabout Intersection Alt Vehicular LOS 4 4 4 4 Pedestrian LOS 1 6 5 6 Bicycle LOS 6 6 6 6 Worst-Case Queueing 1 1 1 5 Total 12 17 16 21 Notes: LOS A = 6 points, LOS B = 5 points, LOS C = 4 points, LOS D = 3 points, LOS E = 2 points, LOS F = 1 point Queueing: 0-100 ft = 6 points, 101-200 ft = 5 points, 201-300 ft = 4 points, 301-400 ft = 3 points, 401-500 ft = 2 pts, 501+ ft = 1 point Based on the parameters, the Roundabout Alternative provides the best overall score based on vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle LOS and queueing. In addition to providing acceptable LOS and reasonable queueing, the Roundabout Alternative would also enhance the pedestrian and bicycle experience. By narrowing the roadway to one through lane in each direction followed by a sharp curve into the roundabout, vehicle speeds and pedestrian crossing distances will be significantly decreased. As discussed in the Safety section of this report, this would reduce the number of high-speed collisions and provide the safest scenario for all users. In addition, the roundabout also slows bicyclists’ speeds by using 5-foot-wide bike ramps angled at 45-degrees, forcing them to slow down as they join with pedestrians within the sidewalk. For bicyclists that choose to stay within the roadway and join with the vehicles entering the roundabout, vehicles are slowed enough that they’ll be traveling at similar speeds. As discussed in each of the sections of this report, the enhancements provided by the roundabout are superior to the other alternatives in almost every category, including pedestrian and bicycle enhancements, traffic impacts and performance, environmental constraints, safety, and aesthetics. For the one remaining category: beach access, all three build alternatives were found to produce similar benefits by aligning with the adjacent Beach Access Repair Project. Overall, the roundabout was the front runner in almost every category, and overall provides the most benefits. Displayed below in Table 6 is an overall alternatives comparison table outlining several aspects of the proposed design alternatives as well as the No Build Alternative. This table has been assembled as a tool for comparing many of the features offered from each alternative, although does not include every topic considered in this report. Items shown include: · The sidewalk width over the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge is provided, showing that the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative and the Roundabout Intersection Alternative provide more space for coastline viewing from the bridge than the Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative. · The existing 5-foot sidewalk on the east side of Carlsbad Blvd to the north of Tamarack Avenue will remain protected in place for the signalized alternatives, while it will be widened to 10 feet for the Roundabout Intersection Alternative. · Bike lane and buffer widths are provided—the key being that the Roundabout Intersection Alternative provides the widest of both (generally the preferred 8-foot width with 3-foot buffer). · All proposed alternatives add additional parking spaces over the No Build Alternative. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 44 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis 26 of 27 · The left-turn from Carlsbad Boulevard onto Sequoia Avenue would be closed with the two signalized alternatives, while it would remain open in the No Build and Roundabout Intersection Alternatives. · As discussed in the Safety section, the roundabout produces far less conflict points between all modes of transportation, including vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Displayed in the table is the total conflict points between vehicles and bicyclists at the subject intersection for each alternative. The proposed signalized alternatives introduce some new conflict points at the bus pull-outs, so have a slightly higher count than the No Build Alternative, while the Roundabout Intersection Alternative is less than half the number of conflict points of all other alternatives. · As discussed in the Safety section, the signalized alternatives introduce some safety measures, which make them safer than the No Build Alternative. However, the Roundabout Intersection Alternative provides the highest improvement regarding safety. · All proposed alternatives achieved LOS A for Pedestrian MMLOS, compared to LOS D for the No Build Alternative. However, all alternatives (including the No Build Alternative) achieved LOS A for Bicycle MMLOS. · In the Mobility Analysis, the Roundabout Intersection Alternative achieved the highest LOS of B for the peak-hour traffic, compared to LOS C for all other alternatives. This means traffic can be expected to perform better with the roundabout, even at the worst hour, compared to the other alternatives. For the reasons outlined above and throughout this report, the design team suggests selection of the Roundabout Alternative as the preferred alternative for this project. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 45 of 356 Al t e r n a t i v e s A n a l y s i s f o r Ca r l s b a d B l v d & T a m a r a c k A v e I n t e r s e c t i o n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t Si d e w a l k ov e r B r i d g e Ea s t e r n Si d e w a l k o n Ca r l s b a d Bl v d Bi k e L a n e Sa f e t y B u f f e r f o r B i k e La n e s Ad d s Pa r k i n g Sp a c e s Le f t t u r n t o Se q u o i a Av e Bi k e & Ve h i c l e Co n f l i c t P o i n t s Im p r o v e s Sa f e t y Re d u c e s C a r Em i s s i o n s Av e r a g e M M L O S 20 3 5 Wo r s t - C a s e Tr a f f i c L e v e l o f Se r v i c e ( L O S ) We s t S i d e No r t h o f Ta m a r a c k Av e Ca r l s b a d Bl v d Ta m a r a c k Av e Ca r l s b a d Bl v d Ta m a r a c k Av e Pe d . Bi c y c l e No B u i l d Al t e r n a t i v e 6 f t 5 f t 5 f t – 7. 5 f t 7 f t 0 f t - 2 f t 0 No Ye s 65 No No Im p r o v e m e n t LO S D LO S A LO S C Al t e r n a t i v e 1 - Si g n a l i z e d 3 - L a n e In t e r s e c t i o n Al t e r n a t i v e 15 . 5 f t 5 f t 6 f t - 8 f t 6 f t - 7 f t 0 f t - 3 f t 0 Ye s No 69 Be t t e r Mi n o r Im p r o v e m e n t LO S A LO S A LO S C Al t e r n a t i v e 2 - Si g n a l i z e d 4 - L a n e In t e r s e c t i o n Al t e r n a t i v e 9. 5 f t - 1 1 f t 5 f t 6 f t 6 f t - 7 f t 0 f t - 2 f t 0 Ye s No 69 Go o d Mi n o r Im p r o v e m e n t LO S A LO S A LO S C Al t e r n a t i v e 3 - Ro u n d a b o u t In t e r s e c t i o n Al t e r n a t i v e 15 f t - 1 6 f t 10 f t 7 f t - 8 f t 5. 5 f t - 7 f t 3 f t 0 f t - 4 f t Ye s Ye s 27 Be s t Hi g h e s t Im p r o v e m e n t LO S A LO S A LO S B Ta b l e 6 . O v e r a l l A l t e r n a t i v e s C o m p a r i s o n 27 o f 2 7 Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 46 of 35 6 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis APPENDICES: Appendix A: Project Alternative Exhibits Appendix B: Traffic Counts Appendix C: Cumulative Project List, Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Appendix D: MMLOS Worksheets Appendix E: Collision Data REFERENCES: Final Mobility Analysis. Wood Rodgers, Inc., San Diego, C.A., 2022. NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the United States. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, TRB, NAS, Washington, D.C., 2007. “Roundabouts, A Safer Choice.” Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-SA-08-006, https://highways.dot.gov/sites/fhwa.dot.gov/files/2022-06/fhwasa08006.pdf Roundabouts: An Informational Guide. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., latest version, except as noted. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/00067/00067.pdf “Safety Effect of Roundabout Conversions in the United States: Empirical Bayes Observational Before-After Study.” Transportation Research Record 1751, Transportation Research Board (TRB), National Academy of Sciences (NAS), Washington, D.C., 2001. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 47 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis Appendix A: Project Alternative Exhibits July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 48 of 356 BU I L D I N G R E L A T I O N S H I P S O N E P R O J E C T A T A T I M E 22 5 1 S A N D I E G O A V E . S T E A - 1 3 0 Te l 6 1 9 . 8 1 9 . 9 2 4 0 Fa x 6 1 9 . 5 1 2 . 5 5 9 9 SA N D I E G O , C A 9 2 1 1 0 ℄ ℄ ℄ ℄ Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 49 of 35 6 BU I L D I N G R E L A T I O N S H I P S O N E P R O J E C T A T A T I M E 22 5 1 S A N D I E G O A V E . S T E A - 1 3 0 Te l 6 1 9 . 8 1 9 . 9 2 4 0 Fa x 6 1 9 . 5 1 2 . 5 5 9 9 SA N D I E G O , C A 9 2 1 1 0 ℄ ℄ ℄ ℄ Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 50 of 35 6 BU I L D I N G R E L A T I O N S H I P S O N E P R O J E C T A T A T I M E 22 5 1 S A N D I E G O A V E . S T E A - 1 3 0 Te l 6 1 9 . 8 1 9 . 9 2 4 0 Fa x 6 1 9 . 5 1 2 . 5 5 9 9 SA N D I E G O , C A 9 2 1 1 0 ℄ ℄ ℄ ℄ Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 51 of 35 6 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis Appendix B: Traffic Counts July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 52 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam AM Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 5/12/2022 Page No : 1 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Total Volume Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 8 71 0 79 26 3 6 35 1 24 8 33 1 2 0 3 150 07:15 AM 11 87 1 99 28 1 12 41 5 29 9 43 1 5 2 8 191 07:30 AM 9 113 2 124 48 2 14 64 3 43 17 63 1 0 1 2 253 07:45 AM 6 118 0 124 57 3 25 85 1 41 13 55 3 1 0 4 268 Total 34 389 3 426 159 9 57 225 10 137 47 194 6 8 3 17 862 08:00 AM 14 104 9 127 62 2 16 80 1 46 12 59 0 1 3 4 270 08:15 AM 12 94 3 109 54 12 11 77 4 53 19 76 1 3 4 8 270 08:30 AM 14 93 6 113 53 8 19 80 8 75 26 109 2 2 0 4 306 08:45 AM 16 93 4 113 29 5 13 47 8 71 20 99 1 2 5 8 267 Total 56 384 22 462 198 27 59 284 21 245 77 343 4 8 12 24 1113 Grand Total 90 773 25 888 357 36 116 509 31 382 124 537 10 16 15 41 1975 Apprch %10.1 87 2.8 70.1 7.1 22.8 5.8 71.1 23.1 24.4 39 36.6 Total %4.6 39.1 1.3 45 18.1 1.8 5.9 25.8 1.6 19.3 6.3 27.2 0.5 0.8 0.8 2.1 Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 6 118 0 124 57 3 25 85 1 41 13 55 3 1 0 4 268 08:00 AM 14 104 9 127 62 2 16 80 1 46 12 59 0 1 3 4 270 08:15 AM 12 94 3 109 54 12 11 77 4 53 19 76 1 3 4 8 270 08:30 AM 14 93 6 113 53 8 19 80 8 75 26 109 2 2 0 4 306 Total Volume 46 409 18 473 226 25 71 322 14 215 70 299 6 7 7 20 1114 % App. Total 9.7 86.5 3.8 70.2 7.8 22 4.7 71.9 23.4 30 35 35 PHF .821 .867 .500 .931 .911 .521 .710 .947 .438 .717 .673 .686 .500 .583 .438 .625 .910 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 53 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam AM Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 5/12/2022 Page No : 2 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Carlsbad Boulevard B e a c h P a r k i n g T a m r a c k A v e n u e Carlsbad Boulevard Right 18 Thru 409 Left 46 InOut Total 292 473 765 Ri g h t 71 Th r u 25 Le f t 22 6 Ou t To t a l In 12 3 32 2 44 5 Left 14 Thru 215 Right 70 Out TotalIn 642 299 941 Le f t 6 Th r u 7 Rig h t 7 To t a l Ou t In 57 20 77 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Total Volume Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 08:00 AM +0 mins.9 113 2 124 57 3 25 85 1 46 12 59 0 1 3 4 +15 mins.6 118 0 124 62 2 16 80 4 53 19 76 1 3 4 8 +30 mins.14 104 9 127 54 12 11 77 8 75 26 109 2 2 0 4 +45 mins.12 94 3 109 53 8 19 80 8 71 20 99 1 2 5 8 Total Volume 41 429 14 484 226 25 71 322 21 245 77 343 4 8 12 24 % App. Total 8.5 88.6 2.9 70.2 7.8 22 6.1 71.4 22.4 16.7 33.3 50 PHF .732 .909 .389 .953 .911 .521 .710 .947 .656 .817 .740 .787 .500 .667 .600 .750 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 54 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam PM Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 5/12/2022 Page No : 1 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Total Volume Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 28 122 4 154 35 4 23 62 10 243 47 300 8 2 9 19 535 04:15 PM 24 113 2 139 24 3 33 60 6 244 71 321 4 3 10 17 537 04:30 PM 22 115 7 144 27 7 18 52 9 274 73 356 2 7 5 14 566 04:45 PM 24 101 2 127 24 1 5 30 7 215 98 320 2 3 3 8 485 Total 98 451 15 564 110 15 79 204 32 976 289 1297 16 15 27 58 2123 05:00 PM 27 97 3 127 33 4 17 54 14 243 66 323 2 6 5 13 517 05:15 PM 23 84 4 111 24 8 25 57 9 241 63 313 4 6 2 12 493 05:30 PM 20 103 5 128 28 1 20 49 12 227 74 313 4 4 3 11 501 05:45 PM 15 76 3 94 33 1 19 53 9 207 55 271 1 3 5 9 427 Total 85 360 15 460 118 14 81 213 44 918 258 1220 11 19 15 45 1938 Grand Total 183 811 30 1024 228 29 160 417 76 1894 547 2517 27 34 42 103 4061 Apprch %17.9 79.2 2.9 54.7 7 38.4 3 75.2 21.7 26.2 33 40.8 Total %4.5 20 0.7 25.2 5.6 0.7 3.9 10.3 1.9 46.6 13.5 62 0.7 0.8 1 2.5 Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 28 122 4 154 35 4 23 62 10 243 47 300 8 2 9 19 535 04:15 PM 24 113 2 139 24 3 33 60 6 244 71 321 4 3 10 17 537 04:30 PM 22 115 7 144 27 7 18 52 9 274 73 356 2 7 5 14 566 04:45 PM 24 101 2 127 24 1 5 30 7 215 98 320 2 3 3 8 485 Total Volume 98 451 15 564 110 15 79 204 32 976 289 1297 16 15 27 58 2123 % App. Total 17.4 80 2.7 53.9 7.4 38.7 2.5 75.3 22.3 27.6 25.9 46.6 PHF .875 .924 .536 .916 .786 .536 .598 .823 .800 .891 .737 .911 .500 .536 .675 .763 .938 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 55 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam PM Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 5/12/2022 Page No : 2 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Carlsbad Boulevard B e a c h P a r k i n g T a m r a c k A v e n u e Carlsbad Boulevard Right 15 Thru 451 Left 98 InOut Total 1071 564 1635 Ri g h t 79 Th r u 15 Le f t 11 0 Ou t To t a l In 40 2 20 4 60 6 Left 32 Thru 976 Right 289 Out TotalIn 588 1297 1885 Le f t 16 Th r u 15 Rig h t 27 To t a l Ou t In 62 58 12 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Total Volume Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:00 PM +0 mins.28 122 4 154 33 4 17 54 6 244 71 321 8 2 9 19 +15 mins.24 113 2 139 24 8 25 57 9 274 73 356 4 3 10 17 +30 mins.22 115 7 144 28 1 20 49 7 215 98 320 2 7 5 14 +45 mins.24 101 2 127 33 1 19 53 14 243 66 323 2 3 3 8 Total Volume 98 451 15 564 118 14 81 213 36 976 308 1320 16 15 27 58 % App. Total 17.4 80 2.7 55.4 6.6 38 2.7 73.9 23.3 27.6 25.9 46.6 PHF .875 .924 .536 .916 .894 .438 .810 .934 .643 .891 .786 .927 .500 .536 .675 .763 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 56 of 356 Location: Date: 5/12/2022 N/S: Day: Thursday E/W: North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians 15 3 0 14 32 15 0 0 10 25 13 4 0 16 33 7301222 12 5 1 24 42 15 4 0 22 41 13 13 0 26 52 12 8 0 30 50 102 40 1 154 297 North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians 21 6 0 15 42 23 4 0 19 46 10 1 2 25 38 22 10 0 26 58 18 3 0 33 54 42 12 0 25 79 38 12 0 20 70 16 4 0 17 37 190 52 2 180 424 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue PEDESTRIANS Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 57 of 356 Location: Date: 5/12/2022 N/S: Day: Thursday E/W: Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 060203011000 13 030101020000 7 030200002000 7 070000020000 9 020000024000 8 090250072000 25 030361170000 21 090000053010 18 0 42 0 10 11 5 1 26 12 0 1 0 108 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 01300001110000 25 070100082000 18 0150100054000 25 01900030161011 41 130404051000 18 01005020100000 27 12903000105000 48 01714020143110 43 2 113 1 18 0 11 1 79 16 1 2 1 245 Tamrack Avenue TOTAL VOLUMES: Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 5:30 PM 5:45 PM Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Eastbound TOTAL VOLUMES: 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM Southbound Westbound Northbound Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad BICYCLES 7:30 AM 7:00 AM 7:15 AM Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 58 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam 6-18 Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 6/18/2022 Page No : 1 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Total Volume Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 20 151 14 185 54 10 30 94 17 129 32 178 6 6 11 23 480 11:15 AM 20 132 7 159 34 4 29 67 12 163 25 200 3 3 7 13 439 11:30 AM 24 142 9 175 27 6 18 51 15 172 40 227 8 6 5 19 472 11:45 AM 27 163 3 193 45 5 22 72 11 206 41 258 3 4 5 12 535 Total 91 588 33 712 160 25 99 284 55 670 138 863 20 19 28 67 1926 12:00 PM 30 125 4 159 44 12 32 88 8 164 50 222 2 4 10 16 485 12:15 PM 18 149 13 180 40 2 21 63 11 201 34 246 4 10 6 20 509 12:30 PM 29 168 11 208 41 0 36 77 10 230 37 277 0 0 17 17 579 12:45 PM 26 143 12 181 42 0 21 63 16 236 24 276 0 0 14 14 534 Total 103 585 40 728 167 14 110 291 45 831 145 1021 6 14 47 67 2107 Grand Total 194 1173 73 1440 327 39 209 575 100 1501 283 1884 26 33 75 134 4033 Apprch %13.5 81.5 5.1 56.9 6.8 36.3 5.3 79.7 15 19.4 24.6 56 Total %4.8 29.1 1.8 35.7 8.1 1 5.2 14.3 2.5 37.2 7 46.7 0.6 0.8 1.9 3.3 Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 27 163 3 193 45 5 22 72 11 206 41 258 3 4 5 12 535 12:00 PM 30 125 4 159 44 12 32 88 8 164 50 222 2 4 10 16 485 12:15 PM 18 149 13 180 40 2 21 63 11 201 34 246 4 10 6 20 509 12:30 PM 29 168 11 208 41 0 36 77 10 230 37 277 0 0 17 17 579 Total Volume 104 605 31 740 170 19 111 300 40 801 162 1003 9 18 38 65 2108 % App. Total 14.1 81.8 4.2 56.7 6.3 37 4 79.9 16.2 13.8 27.7 58.5 PHF .867 .900 .596 .889 .944 .396 .771 .852 .909 .871 .810 .905 .563 .450 .559 .813 .910 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 59 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam 6-18 Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 6/18/2022 Page No : 2 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Carlsbad Boulevard B e a c h P a r k i n g T a m r a c k A v e n u e Carlsbad Boulevard Right 31 Thru 605 Left 104 InOut Total 921 740 1661 Ri g h t 11 1 Th r u 19 Le f t 17 0 Ou t To t a l In 28 4 30 0 58 4 Left 40 Thru 801 Right 162 Out TotalIn 813 1003 1816 Le f t 9 Th r u 18 Rig h t 38 To t a l Ou t In 90 65 15 5 Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 AM Total Volume Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 11:00 AM +0 mins.27 163 3 193 45 5 22 72 8 164 50 222 6 6 11 23 +15 mins.30 125 4 159 44 12 32 88 11 201 34 246 3 3 7 13 +30 mins.18 149 13 180 40 2 21 63 10 230 37 277 8 6 5 19 +45 mins.29 168 11 208 41 0 36 77 16 236 24 276 3 4 5 12 Total Volume 104 605 31 740 170 19 111 300 45 831 145 1021 20 19 28 67 % App. Total 14.1 81.8 4.2 56.7 6.3 37 4.4 81.4 14.2 29.9 28.4 41.8 PHF .867 .900 .596 .889 .944 .396 .771 .852 .703 .880 .725 .921 .625 .792 .636 .728 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 60 of 356 Location:  N/S:  E/W: Date: 6/18/2022 Day: Saturday North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Beach Parking Driveway Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians 28 11 0 8 47 57 12 0 4 73 49 16 0 12 77 26 7 0 10 43 41 11 0 15 67 36 17 0 4 57 58 23 0 1 82 39 12 0 1 52 334 109 0 55 498 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue PEDESTRIANS Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 61 of 356 Location:  N/S:  E/W: Date: 6/18/2022 Day: Saturday Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 33102010341020 74 13714010406000 90 227180322110100 75 32302010271000 57 01801210291000 52 22224002174011 55 02206141112000 47 42885010273023 81 15 208 12 32 3 12 5 206 28 1 5 4 531 Beach Parking Driveway TOTAL VOLUMES: Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Eastbound 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM Southbound Westbound Northbound Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad BICYCLES 11:30 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 62 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam 6-25 Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 6/25/2022 Page No : 1 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Total Volume Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 27 136 9 172 49 7 24 80 15 100 25 140 4 7 9 20 412 11:15 AM 21 136 5 162 52 12 29 93 12 123 30 165 8 7 23 38 458 11:30 AM 21 143 12 176 45 6 32 83 12 128 29 169 3 6 21 30 458 11:45 AM 32 170 13 215 50 11 32 93 10 120 31 161 3 12 10 25 494 Total 101 585 39 725 196 36 117 349 49 471 115 635 18 32 63 113 1822 12:00 PM 18 157 13 188 29 6 33 68 8 136 38 182 10 9 12 31 469 12:15 PM 31 139 8 178 32 8 28 68 12 122 26 160 4 6 16 26 432 12:30 PM 27 183 13 223 36 5 33 74 12 140 24 176 9 3 9 21 494 12:45 PM 23 172 8 203 41 6 28 75 6 120 29 155 6 8 14 28 461 Total 99 651 42 792 138 25 122 285 38 518 117 673 29 26 51 106 1856 Grand Total 200 1236 81 1517 334 61 239 634 87 989 232 1308 47 58 114 219 3678 Apprch %13.2 81.5 5.3 52.7 9.6 37.7 6.7 75.6 17.7 21.5 26.5 52.1 Total %5.4 33.6 2.2 41.2 9.1 1.7 6.5 17.2 2.4 26.9 6.3 35.6 1.3 1.6 3.1 6 Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 32 170 13 215 50 11 32 93 10 120 31 161 3 12 10 25 494 12:00 PM 18 157 13 188 29 6 33 68 8 136 38 182 10 9 12 31 469 12:15 PM 31 139 8 178 32 8 28 68 12 122 26 160 4 6 16 26 432 12:30 PM 27 183 13 223 36 5 33 74 12 140 24 176 9 3 9 21 494 Total Volume 108 649 47 804 147 30 126 303 42 518 119 679 26 30 47 103 1889 % App. Total 13.4 80.7 5.8 48.5 9.9 41.6 6.2 76.3 17.5 25.2 29.1 45.6 PHF .844 .887 .904 .901 .735 .682 .955 .815 .875 .925 .783 .933 .650 .625 .734 .831 .956 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 63 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam 6-25 Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 6/25/2022 Page No : 2 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Carlsbad Boulevard B e a c h P a r k i n g T a m r a c k A v e n u e Carlsbad Boulevard Right 47 Thru 649 Left 108 InOut Total 670 804 1474 Ri g h t 12 6 Th r u 30 Le f t 14 7 Ou t To t a l In 25 7 30 3 56 0 Left 42 Thru 518 Right 119 Out TotalIn 843 679 1522 Le f t 26 Th r u 30 Rig h t 47 To t a l Ou t In 11 9 10 3 22 2 Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 AM Total Volume Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 11:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:45 AM 11:15 AM +0 mins.32 170 13 215 49 7 24 80 10 120 31 161 8 7 23 38 +15 mins.18 157 13 188 52 12 29 93 8 136 38 182 3 6 21 30 +30 mins.31 139 8 178 45 6 32 83 12 122 26 160 3 12 10 25 +45 mins.27 183 13 223 50 11 32 93 12 140 24 176 10 9 12 31 Total Volume 108 649 47 804 196 36 117 349 42 518 119 679 24 34 66 124 % App. Total 13.4 80.7 5.8 56.2 10.3 33.5 6.2 76.3 17.5 19.4 27.4 53.2 PHF .844 .887 .904 .901 .942 .750 .914 .938 .875 .925 .783 .933 .600 .708 .717 .816 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 64 of 356 Location:  N/S:  E/W: Date: 6/25/2022 Day: Saturday North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Beach Parking Driveway Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians 38 15 0 15 68 45 18 1 12 76 58 22 0 5 85 35 16 0 1 52 38 14 0 11 63 52 18 1 14 85 56 17 0 2 75 45 14 0 4 63 367 134 2 64 567 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue PEDESTRIANS Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 65 of 356 Location:  N/S:  E/W: Date: 6/25/2022 Day: Saturday Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 53544022393212 99 33136030300000 76 12601150292000 65 43406230216100 77 130210000344000 81 12709320221000 65 21803121293010 60 2200402091122 43 19 221 9 43 7 19 3 213 20 4 4 4 566 Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Beach Parking Driveway Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 12:30 PM 12:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad BICYCLES Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 66 of 356 Page 1 City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard B/ Sequoia Avenue - Bridge 24 Hour Directional Volume Count CARCASE Site Code: 999-22433 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 Phone: (951) 268-6268 email: counts@countsunlimited.com Start 6/30/2022 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 10 170 12 228 12:15 6 202 16 222 12:30 14 162 6 219 12:45 5 176 35 710 7 216 41 885 76 1595 01:00 6 195 7 219 01:15 5 180 6 225 01:30 2 198 2 217 01:45 3 183 16 756 2 159 17 820 33 1576 02:00 2 205 5 193 02:15 1 189 1 172 02:30 7 233 2 186 02:45 1 251 11 878 2 160 10 711 21 1589 03:00 1 226 1 192 03:15 1 273 0 187 03:30 0 239 8 216 03:45 3 276 5 1014 5 196 14 791 19 1805 04:00 1 270 4 202 04:15 6 264 4 161 04:30 3 291 9 168 04:45 2 269 12 1094 8 193 25 724 37 1818 05:00 4 272 15 183 05:15 6 301 23 173 05:30 13 304 33 200 05:45 15 286 38 1163 62 158 133 714 171 1877 06:00 22 235 69 158 06:15 27 175 76 196 06:30 37 215 90 171 06:45 36 186 122 811 120 152 355 677 477 1488 07:00 51 197 95 156 07:15 37 169 102 148 07:30 56 173 143 138 07:45 67 173 211 712 121 148 461 590 672 1302 08:00 69 156 137 151 08:15 86 156 155 119 08:30 99 102 146 102 08:45 91 100 345 514 146 82 584 454 929 968 09:00 95 75 120 80 09:15 86 58 125 73 09:30 122 79 137 75 09:45 103 64 406 276 142 64 524 292 930 568 10:00 106 93 139 82 10:15 137 102 132 79 10:30 148 82 155 55 10:45 147 62 538 339 151 39 577 255 1115 594 11:00 154 54 181 31 11:15 163 42 176 15 11:30 166 25 178 14 11:45 152 17 635 138 261 19 796 79 1431 217 Total 2374 8405 2374 8405 3537 6992 3537 6992 5911 15397 Combined Total 10779 10779 10529 10529 21308 AM Peak - 11:00 --- 11:00 ----- Vol.- 635 --- 796 ----- P.H.F. 0.956 0.762 PM Peak -- 05:00 --- 12:00 ---- Vol.-- 1163 --- 885 ---- P.H.F. 0.956 0.970 Percentag e 22.0% 78.0% 33.6% 66.4% ADT/AADT ADT 21,308 AADT 21,308 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 67 of 356 Page 1 City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard B/ Sequoia Avenue - Bridge 24 Hour Directional Volume Count CARCASE_Sat Site Code: 999-22433 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 Phone: (951) 268-6268 email: counts@countsunlimited.com Start 6/18/2022 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 26 211 25 184 12:15 18 231 28 198 12:30 19 237 13 228 12:45 13 240 76 919 13 203 79 813 155 1732 01:00 8 236 6 222 01:15 9 207 7 221 01:30 7 222 6 260 01:45 7 246 31 911 8 227 27 930 58 1841 02:00 9 205 5 241 02:15 8 229 8 234 02:30 7 202 5 184 02:45 8 229 32 865 7 229 25 888 57 1753 03:00 6 236 4 214 03:15 4 215 2 221 03:30 8 205 4 240 03:45 8 208 26 864 4 217 14 892 40 1756 04:00 5 203 3 243 04:15 3 198 5 178 04:30 3 181 6 232 04:45 4 202 15 784 8 205 22 858 37 1642 05:00 2 174 11 191 05:15 4 187 20 165 05:30 8 210 32 222 05:45 13 180 27 751 26 182 89 760 116 1511 06:00 16 185 29 160 06:15 20 178 35 161 06:30 29 157 64 169 06:45 33 158 98 678 48 145 176 635 274 1313 07:00 44 171 62 145 07:15 57 155 63 141 07:30 52 146 83 135 07:45 45 139 198 611 68 140 276 561 474 1172 08:00 52 143 84 138 08:15 62 140 94 131 08:30 105 131 89 124 08:45 85 119 304 533 113 108 380 501 684 1034 09:00 99 90 112 100 09:15 121 85 130 91 09:30 97 75 153 82 09:45 130 64 447 314 137 74 532 347 979 661 10:00 109 57 170 75 10:15 128 42 195 68 10:30 150 49 172 63 10:45 133 38 520 186 214 50 751 256 1271 442 11:00 178 35 222 46 11:15 194 29 169 35 11:30 214 25 185 27 11:45 248 23 834 112 225 20 801 128 1635 240 Total 2608 7528 2608 7528 3172 7569 3172 7569 5780 15097 Combined Total 10136 10136 10741 10741 20877 AM Peak - 11:00 --- 10:15 ----- Vol.- 834 --- 803 ----- P.H.F. 0.841 0.904 PM Peak -- 00:15 --- 01:30 ---- Vol.-- 944 --- 962 ---- P.H.F. 0.983 0.925 Percentag e 25.7% 74.3% 29.5% 70.5% ADT/AADT ADT 20,877 AADT 20,877 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 68 of 356 Page 1 City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard B/ Sequoia Avenue - Bridge 24 Hour Directional Volume Count CARCASE_SAT2 Site Code: 999-22433 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 Phone: (951) 268-6268 email: counts@countsunlimited.com Start 6/25/2022 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 26 202 25 184 12:15 17 162 27 171 12:30 22 182 10 204 12:45 13 154 78 700 14 201 76 760 154 1460 01:00 12 159 7 181 01:15 10 174 6 198 01:30 11 205 16 196 01:45 7 167 40 705 8 194 37 769 77 1474 02:00 6 169 9 256 02:15 8 201 7 216 02:30 5 194 3 187 02:45 8 210 27 774 6 218 25 877 52 1651 03:00 2 213 5 204 03:15 4 187 2 197 03:30 4 183 3 193 03:45 7 182 17 765 4 192 14 786 31 1551 04:00 2 215 4 184 04:15 3 161 5 189 04:30 5 240 11 199 04:45 4 253 14 869 9 206 29 778 43 1647 05:00 8 300 21 188 05:15 4 290 20 186 05:30 7 311 27 209 05:45 12 332 31 1233 30 181 98 764 129 1997 06:00 13 296 29 159 06:15 26 295 35 171 06:30 26 251 56 144 06:45 34 165 99 1007 66 146 186 620 285 1627 07:00 41 209 67 142 07:15 50 172 81 117 07:30 58 151 77 120 07:45 55 176 204 708 79 113 304 492 508 1200 08:00 85 145 98 136 08:15 101 137 88 132 08:30 107 127 117 112 08:45 111 61 404 470 121 106 424 486 828 956 09:00 115 57 126 91 09:15 117 67 129 81 09:30 125 75 143 82 09:45 137 64 494 263 152 71 550 325 1044 588 10:00 148 55 149 72 10:15 150 39 157 58 10:30 170 51 187 60 10:45 161 41 629 186 157 56 650 246 1279 432 11:00 146 33 187 43 11:15 171 26 196 30 11:30 167 25 202 24 11:45 147 33 631 117 230 28 815 125 1446 242 Total 2668 7797 2668 7797 3208 7028 3208 7028 5876 14825 Combined Total 10465 10465 10236 10236 20701 AM Peak - 10:30 --- 11:00 ----- Vol.- 648 --- 815 ----- P.H.F. 0.947 0.886 PM Peak -- 05:30 --- 02:00 ---- Vol.-- 1234 --- 877 ---- P.H.F. 0.929 0.856 Percentag e 25.5% 74.5% 31.3% 68.7% ADT/AADT ADT 20,701 AADT 20,701 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 69 of 356 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: N-S STREET:DATE:LOCATION: E-W STREET:DAY:PROJECT# NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 0 59 1 1 161 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 225 7:15 AM 0 46 2 1 175 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 229 7:30 AM 0 77 1 0 228 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 307 7:45 AM 0 69 1 0 225 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 299 8:00 AM 0 89 2 0 164 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 259 8:15 AM 0 77 1 1 173 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 254 8:30 AM 0 82 0 2 155 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 241 8:45 AM 0 98 5 3 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 235 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL Volumes 0 597 13 8 1410 0 0 0 0 16 0 5 2049 Approach %0.00 97.87 2.13 0.56 99.44 0.00 ############76.19 0.00 23.81 App/Depart 610 /602 1418 /1426 0 /21 21 /0 730 AM PEAK Volumes 0 312 5 1 790 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 1119 Approach %0.00 98.42 1.58 0.13 99.87 0.00 ############90.91 0.00 9.09 PEAK HR. FACTOR:0.911 33.146855, -117.344816 08/27/19 CarlsbadCarlsbad Blvd. Sequoia Ave.19-1419-002TUESDAY 0.867 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 0.688 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.0000.871 1-Way Stop (WB) COMMENT 1: GPS: CONTROL: veracity grouptraffic July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 70 of 356 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: N-S STREET:DATE:LOCATION: E-W STREET:DAY:PROJECT# NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 0 49 1 1 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 174 7:15 AM 0 42 2 1 114 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 163 7:30 AM 0 73 1 2 163 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 242 7:45 AM 0 67 0 0 184 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 254 8:00 AM 0 88 1 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 217 8:15 AM 0 83 0 3 133 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 220 8:30 AM 0 93 0 3 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 225 8:45 AM 0 87 3 1 99 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 197 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL Volumes 0 582 8 11 1067 0 0 0 0 9 0 15 1692 Approach %0.00 98.64 1.36 1.02 98.98 0.00 ############37.50 0.00 62.50 App/Depart 590 /597 1078 /1076 0 /19 24 /0 730 AM PEAK Volumes 0 311 2 5 606 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 933 Approach %0.00 99.36 0.64 0.82 99.18 0.00 ############44.44 0.00 55.56 PEAK HR. FACTOR:0.918 33.148205, -117.345909 08/27/19 CarlsbadCarlsbad Blvd. Redwood Ave.19-1419-003TUESDAY 0.830 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 0.750 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.0000.879 1-Way Stop (WB) COMMENT 1: GPS: CONTROL: veracity grouptraffic July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 71 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis Appendix C: Cumulative Project List, Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignments July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 72 of 356 3060 STATE STREET RESTAURANT - 3060 STATE STREET 1,358 sf restaurant & outdoor patio converted from existing vacant commercial building. In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 1.358 1,000 Sq. Ft. GFA1 191 7 8 15 9 6 15 132 24 20 44 191 7 8 15 9 6 15 132 24 20 44 CARLSBAD BY THE SEA SUMMERHOUSE - 2710 OCEAN STREET Carlsbad by the Sea Summerhouse: Consolodation of 5 parcels for new 40,000 sq ft professional services building for memory care and independent living. In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 56 beds /40,000 sf beds /1,000 Sq. Ft. GFA1 168 7 5 12 5 7 12 168 6 13 19 168 7 5 12 5 7 12 168 6 13 19 CHINQUAPIN COASTAL HOMES - 330 CHINQUAPIN AVENUE Chinquapin Coast Homes: Three Triplex buildings containing nine airspace condominium units. In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 9 DU1 72 1 5 6 5 2 7 79 2 3 7 72 1 5 6 5 2 7 79 2 3 7 GARFIELD BEACH HOMES - 3570 GARFIELD STREET Construction of 12 single family dwelling units. In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 12 DU1 120 3 7 10 8 4 12 123 11 9 20 120 3 7 10 8 4 12 123 11 9 20 VIGILUCCI'S SEAFOOD & STEAKHOUSE - 3878 CARLSBAD BOULEVARD Addition of a 1,925 sf to the patio area to accommodate 104 seats for dining use. In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 1.925 sf /104 seats Seats /1,000 Sq. Ft. GFA1 193 1 1 2 11 5 16 267 20 14 34 193 1 1 2 11 5 16 267 20 14 34 Land Use Category Quality Restaurant Quantity Units Total Project Trips Notes: 1 GFA = Gross Floor Area 2 Trip rates are calculated based on SANDAG's Brief Guid of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002). Equivalent number of beds was calculated using ITE trip rates for 1,000 sf of Assisted Living. 3 Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) average rates. Quantity Units Weekday2 SANDAG - Condominium (or any multi-family 6-20 DU/acre) Summer Saturday3 ITE 215 Single-Family Attached Housing Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Midday Peak Hour Midday Peak Hour Weekday2 SANDAG - Convalescent/Nursing (56 Beds) Notes: 1 GFA = Gross Floor Area 2 Trip rates are calculated based on SANDAG's Brief Guid of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) 3 Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) average rates. Quantity Units Weekday2 SANDAG - Sit-Down, High Turnover Restaurant (less 12% pass-by trips) Daily Total Project Trips PM Peak HourDailyAM Peak Hour Midday Peak Hour Summer Saturday3 ITE 930 Fast Casual Restaurant Restaurant Land Use Category Summer Saturday3 ITE 245 Assisted Living (40,000 square feet) Single-Family Detached Housing Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Land Use Category Condominium Notes: 1 DU = Dwelling Units 2 Trip rates are calculated based on SANDAG's Brief Guid of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) 3 Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) average rates . Quantity Units Weekday2 SANDAG - Single-Family Detached (Average 3-6 DU/acre) Summer Saturday3 ITE 210 Single-Family Detached Housing Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Midday Peak Hour Land Use Category Assisted Living Total Project Trips Notes: 1 GFA = Gross Floor Area 2 Trip rates are calculated based on SANDAG's Brief Guid of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) 3 Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) average rates . Total Project Trips Notes: 1 DU = Dwelling Units 2 Trip rates are calculated based on SANDAG's Brief Guid of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) 3 Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) fitted curve equations. Quantity Units Weekday2 SANDAG - Quality Restaurant (1.925 square feet) Summer Saturday3 ITE 931 Fine Dining Restaurant (104 Seats) Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Land Use Category Midday Peak Hour Total Project Trips Cumulative_Project_Volumes.xlsxJuly 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 73 of 356 3060 STATE STREET RESTAURANT INBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 20% OUTBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 20% CARLSBAD BY THE SEA SUMMERHOUSE INBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 50%20% OUTBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 20%50% CHINQUAPIN COASTAL HOMES INBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 20%80% OUTBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 50%50% GARFIELD BEACH HOMES INBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 40%20% OUTBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 60% VIGILUCCI'S SEAFOOD & STEAKHOUSE INBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 40%40% OUTBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 40%40% July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 74 of 356 3060 STATE STREET RESTAURANT AM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Summer Saturday INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CARLSBAD BY THE SEA SUMMERHOUSE AM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 4 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Summer Saturday INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 3 0 3 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 CHINQUAPIN COASTAL HOMES AM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 PM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Summer Saturday INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 GARFIELD BEACH HOMES AM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Summer Saturday INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 4 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VIGILUCCI'S SEAFOOD & STEAKHOUSE AM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 Summer Saturday INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 8 8 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 75 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis Appendix D: MMLOS Worksheets July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 76 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis No Build Alternative Conditions – Existing July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 77 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes No * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 5 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?No No Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Blvd (North Leg) Redwood Ave Tamarack Ave Coastals 18,500 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 70 | C NB SCORE | LOS 70 | C SB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 78 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 8 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Blvd (North Leg) Redwood Ave Tamarack Ave Coastals 18,500 95 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 79 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?No No * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 6 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?No No Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Blvd (South Leg) Tamarack Ave Sequoia Ave Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 45 | F NB SCORE | LOS 55 | E SB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 80 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 4 2 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Blvd (South Leg) Tamarack Ave Sequoia Ave Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 81 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 5 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?No No Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Tamarack Ave (East Leg) Carlsbad Blvd Garfield St Neighborhood Connector 6,900 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 80 | B EB SCORE | LOS 80 | B WB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 82 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Tamarack Ave (East Leg) Carlsbad Blvd Garfield St Neighborhood Connector 6,900 95 | A EB SCORE | LOS 95 | A WB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 83 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?No No * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 5 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?No No Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Blvd (Bridge Segment) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 45 | F NB SCORE | LOS 45 | F SB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 84 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 4 4 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Blvd (Bridge Segment) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 85 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis Signalized 3- & 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives Conditions – Existing July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 86 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes No Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (North Leg) Tamarack Avenue Redwood Avenue Identity (adjacent to residential) 18,500 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 95 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 87 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 2 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (North Leg) Tamarack Avenue Redwood Avenue Identity (adjacent to residential) 18,500 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 88 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 7 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (South Leg) Tamarack Avenue Sequoia Avenue Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 89 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (South Leg) Tamarack Avenue Sequoia Avenue Coastals 21,400 90 | A NB SCORE | LOS 90 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 90 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):6 6 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Tamarack Avenue (East Leg) Carlsbad Boulevard Garfield Street Neighborhood Connector 6,900 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 91 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 7 7 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Tamarack Avenue (East Leg) Carlsbad Boulevard Garfield Street Neighborhood Connector 6,900 95 | A EB SCORE | LOS 95 | A WB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 92 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 11 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?Yes Yes Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment-3-Ln Alt) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 95 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 93 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 2 3 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment-3-Ln Alt) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 94 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 11 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?Yes Yes Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment-4-Ln Alt) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 85 | B NB SCORE | LOS 95 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 95 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 2 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment-4-Ln Alt) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 90 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 96 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis Roundabout Intersection Alternative Conditions - Existing July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 97 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (North Leg) Tamarack Avenue Redwood Avenue Identity (adjacent to residential) 18,500 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 98 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 8 7 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 3 3 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (North Leg) Tamarack Avenue Redwood Avenue Identity (adjacent to residential) 18,500 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 99 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 14 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (South Leg) Tamarack Avenue Sequoia Avenue Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 100 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 7 8 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 3 3 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (South Leg) Tamarack Avenue Sequoia Avenue Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 101 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):6 6 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Tamarack Avenue (East Leg) Carlsbad Boulevard Garfield Street Neighborhood Connector 6,900 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 102 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 5.5 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Tamarack Avenue (East Leg) Carlsbad Boulevard Garfield Street Neighborhood Connector 6,900 95 | A EB SCORE | LOS 95 | A WB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 103 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):13 14 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?Yes Yes Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 104 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 8 8 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 3 3 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 105 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Alternatives Analysis Appendix E: Collision Data July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 106 of 356 Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t / T r a f f i c & Mo b i l i t y D i v i s i o n Fr o m 1 / 1 / 2 0 0 8 t o 8 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 1 T o t a l C o l l i s i o n s : 1 5 4 4 4 2 5 I n j u r y C o l l i s i o n s : 1 2 F a t a l C o l l i s i o n s : 0 Te x t 1 Te x t 3 Te x t 4 Te x t 5 Te x t 8 Te x t 1 0 Te x t 1 1 Te x t 2 0 Te x t 2 1 Te x t 2 2 Cit y Te x t 6 Te x t 7 Te x t 9 Te x t 1 8 Te x t 1 9 Te x t 1 2 Te x t 1 3 Te x t 1 4 Pa r t y N o Pa r t y T y p e Dir o f T r a v e l Mo v e m e n t Ge n d e r Ag e Ve h T y p e So b r i e t y As s o c F a c t o r Sa f e t y E q u i p Sp e c i a l I n f o 15 - 0 5 9 5 5 8/1 9 / 2 0 1 5 11 : 3 5 We d n e s d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 13 7 ' Dir e c t i o n : S o u t h Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Un s a f e S t a r t i n g o r B a c k i n g 22 1 0 6 Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r No r t h Sto p p e d I n R o a d Ma l e Ag e : 2 4 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r No r t h Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Ma l e Ag e : 5 8 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 15 - 0 8 3 8 8 11 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 5 03 : 3 1 Sa t u r d a y RE D W O O D A V - C A R L S B A D B L 15 ' Dir e c t i o n : E a s t Da r k - S t r e e t L i g h t s Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Hit O b j e c t Fix e d O b j e c t Un k n o w n Hit & R u n : M i s d e m e a n o r Pr o p e r t y D a m a g e O n l y # I n j : 0 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r Ea s t Ma k i n g U T u r n No t S t a t e d Ag e : Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : I m p a i r m e n t N o t K n o w n As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d 16 - 0 2 0 4 4 3/2 6 / 2 0 1 6 09 : 0 2 Sa t u r d a y CA R L S B A D B L - R E D W O O D A V 20 ' Dir e c t i o n : N o r t h Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Un s a f e S p e e d 22 3 5 0 Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r So u t h Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Fe m a l e Ag e : 8 5 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r So u t h Sto p p e d I n R o a d Ma l e Ag e : 5 1 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 16 - 0 3 4 2 0 5/1 4 / 2 0 1 6 10 : 0 6 Sa t u r d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 0' Dir e c t i o n : N o t S t a t e d Da y l i g h t Clo u d y Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Tr a f f i c S i g n a l s a n d S i g n s 21 4 5 3 A Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r So u t h Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Fe m a l e Ag e : 2 6 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : I n a t t e n t i o n Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r Ea s t Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Ma l e Ag e : 6 1 Ve h T y p e : P i c k u p T r u c k So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 16 - 0 6 0 8 7 8/2 9 / 2 0 1 6 20 : 0 8 Mo n d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 3' Dir e c t i o n : N o r t h Da r k - S t r e e t L i g h t s Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Oth e r Bic y c l e Dri v i n g U n d e r I n f l u e n c e 21 2 0 0 5 Hit & R u n : N o Oth e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Bic y c l i s t So u t h Tr a v e l i n g W r o n g W a y Ma l e Ag e : 2 9 Ve h T y p e : B i c y c l e So b r i e t y : H B D U n d e r I n f l u e n c e As s o c F a c t o r : V i o l a t i o n No t S t a t e d Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r We s t Ma k i n g R i g h t T u r n Fe m a l e Ag e : 2 3 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d 16 - 0 6 7 3 8 9/2 5 / 2 0 1 6 20 : 3 1 Su n d a y TA M A R A C K A V - G A R F I E L D S T 0' Dir e c t i o n : N o t S t a t e d Da r k - S t r e e t L i g h t s Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Tr a f f i c S i g n a l s a n d S i g n s 22 4 5 0 A Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r Ea s t Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Fe m a l e Ag e : 3 9 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r So u t h Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Fe m a l e Ag e : 3 4 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 17 - 0 3 7 9 1 6/1 3 / 2 0 1 7 02 : 0 0 Tu e s d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 40 0 ' Dir e c t i o n : S o u t h Da r k - S t r e e t L i g h t s Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Hit O b j e c t Fix e d O b j e c t Dri v i n g U n d e r I n f l u e n c e 23 1 5 2 A Hit & R u n : N o Oth e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r No r t h Oth e r U n s a f e T u r n i n g Fe m a l e Ag e : 2 0 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H B D U n d e r I n f l u e n c e As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d 17 - 0 5 6 4 4 9/2 / 2 0 1 7 18 : 0 0 Sa t u r d a y CA R L S B A D B L - S E Q U O I A A V 81 ' Dir e c t i o n : N o r t h Da y l i g h t Clo u d y Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Un s a f e S p e e d 22 3 5 0 Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 2 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r No r t h Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Ma l e Ag e : 2 9 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r No r t h Sto p p e d I n R o a d Ma l e Ag e : 4 8 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 19 - 0 0 2 9 5 1/1 4 / 2 0 1 9 13 : 2 0 We d n e s d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 60 ' Dir e c t i o n : S O U T H Da y l i g h t Ra i n i n g Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Un s a f e S p e e d 22 3 5 0 Hit & R u n : Oth e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y # I n j : 3 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r NO R T H Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t F Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p B e l t U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r NO R T H Sto p p e d I n R o a d F Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p B e l t U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 3 Dri v e r NO R T H Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t F Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p B e l t U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 19 - 0 5 6 3 5 8/2 2 / 2 0 1 9 14 : 0 2 Th u r s d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 0' Dir e c t i o n : N o t S t a t e d Da y l i g h t Clo u d y Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Sid e s w i p e Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Im p r o p e r T u r n i n g 22 1 0 0 A Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r NO R T H Ma k i n g R i g h t T u r n M Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r NO R T H Ma k i n g R i g h t T u r n M Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : U n d e r D r u g I n f l u e n c e As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 19 - 0 6 0 0 0 9/8 / 2 0 1 9 08 : 4 5 Su n d a y CA R L S B A D B L - S E Q U O I A A V 57 ' Dir e c t i o n : S O U T H Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Sid e s w i p e Mo t o r V e h i c l e o n O t h e r R o a d w a y Im p r o p e r T u r n i n g 22 1 0 7 Hit & R u n : M i s d e m e a n o r Pr o p e r t y D a m a g e O n l y # I n j : 0 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r SO U T H Ch a n g i n g L a n e s No t S t a t e d Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : I m p a i r m e n t N o t K n o w n As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r SO U T H Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t F Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 20 - 0 3 8 1 2 6/2 7 / 2 0 2 0 09 : 3 6 Sa t u r d a y CA R L S B A D B L - S E Q U O I A A V 10 5 ' Dir e c t i o n : S O U T H Da y l i g h t Clo u d y Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Oth e r T h a n D r i v e r Hit & R u n : N o Oth e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r NO R T H Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t F Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : O t h e r La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r NO R T H Sto p p e d I n R o a d M Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 21 - 0 0 3 1 3 1/1 3 / 2 0 2 1 16 : 4 5 We d n e s d a y TA M A R A C K A V - C A R L S B A D B L 79 ' Dir e c t i o n : E A S T Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Un s a f e S t a r t i n g o r B a c k i n g 22 1 0 6 Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r WE S T Ba c k i n g F Ag e : 6 3 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Un k n o w n No t S t a t e d Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r WE S T Sto p p e d I n R o a d F Ag e : 4 1 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d No t S t a t e d 21 - 0 1 7 5 6 3/1 8 / 2 0 2 1 18 : 1 1 Th u r s d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 33 ' Dir e c t i o n : S O U T H Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Dri v i n g U n d e r I n f l u e n c e 23 1 5 2 ( a ) Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r NO R T H Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t F Ag e : 2 4 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H B D U n d e r I n f l u e n c e As s o c F a c t o r : V i o l a t i o n La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r NO R T H Sto p p e d I n R o a d M Ag e : 5 6 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 21 - 0 3 6 3 7 5/3 0 / 2 0 2 1 18 : 3 0 Su n d a y RE D W O O D A V - C A R L S B A D B L 0' Dir e c t i o n : N o t S t a t e d Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Sid e s w i p e Pa r k e d M o t o r V e h i c l e Im p r o p e r T u r n i n g 22 1 0 7 Hit & R u n : N o Pr o p e r t y D a m a g e O n l y # I n j : 0 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r EA S T Ma k i n g R i g h t T u r n M Ag e : 3 1 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : U n d e r D r u g I n f l u e n c e As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Pa r k e d V e h i c l e WE S T Pa r k e d No t S t a t e d Ag e : 0 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : N o t A p p l i c a b l e As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d Pa r t y 3 Pa r k e d V e h i c l e WE S T Pa r k e d No t S t a t e d Ag e : 0 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : N o t A p p l i c a b l e As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 10 7 of 35 6 Co l l i s i o n S u m m a r y R e p o r t Ci t y o f C a r l s b a d Pu b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t / T r a f f i c & M o b i l i t y D i v i s i o n 7/ 2 5 / 2 2 Fr o m 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 t o 7 / 2 5 / 2 0 2 2 To t a l C o l l i s i o n s : 3 In j u r y C o l l i s i o n s : 1 Fa t a l C o l l i s i o n s : 0 CA R L S B A D B L & T A M A R A C K A V Pa g e 1 o f 1 21 - 0 7 7 4 1 11 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 1 09 : 3 0 Fr i d a y Re a r - E n d Pa r k e d M o t o r V e h i c l e CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V Dr i v i n g U n d e r I n f l u e n c e 27 ' Di r e c t i o n : S O U T H Pr o p e r t y D a m a g e O n l y # I n j : 0 # K i l l e d : 0 23 1 5 2 ( a ) Hi t & R u n : N o Da y l i g h t Cl e a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ag e : 5 6 M As s o c F a c t o r : V i o l a t i o n Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t So b r i e t y : H B D U n d e r I n f l u e n c Ve h T y p e : NO R T Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 5 CH E V R O L E T MA L I B U Pa s s e n g e r C a r , S t a t i o n W a g o n , J e e p Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Ag e : 0 No t S t a As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t St o p p e d I n R o a d So b r i e t y : H N B D Ve h T y p e : NO R T Pa r k e d V e h i c l e Pa r t y 2 20 2 0 FO R D EX P L O R E R Pa s s e n g e r C a r , S t a t i o n W a g o n , J e e p 21 - 0 7 9 1 4 11 / 2 5 / 2 0 2 1 14 : 2 5 Th u r s d a y Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V Un s a f e S p e e d 13 ' Di r e c t i o n : S O U T H Pr o p e r t y D a m a g e O n l y # I n j : 0 # K i l l e d : 0 22 3 5 0 Hi t & R u n : M i s d e Da y l i g h t Cl e a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 No t S t a t e d Ag e : 0 No t S t a As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t So b r i e t y : I m p a i r m e n t N o t K n o Ve h T y p e : NO R T Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 19 9 9 MA Z D A PR O T E G E Pa s s e n g e r C a r , S t a t i o n W a g o n , J e e p Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ag e : 6 7 F As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t St o p p e d I n R o a d So b r i e t y : H N B D Ve h T y p e : NO R T Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 2 1 LE X U S RX 3 5 0 Pa s s e n g e r C a r , S t a t i o n W a g o n , J e e p 22 - 0 0 2 0 0 1/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 2 15 : 4 2 Mo n d a y Si d e s w i p e Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V Im p r o p e r T u r n i n g 18 1 ' Di r e c t i o n : N O R T H Ot h e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y # I n j : 2 # K i l l e d : 0 22 1 0 7 Hi t & R u n : N o Da y l i g h t Cl e a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ag e : 2 8 F As s o c F a c t o r : V i o l a t i o n Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t So b r i e t y : H N B D Ve h T y p e : SO U T Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 8 LE X U S RX 3 5 0 Pa s s e n g e r C a r , S t a t i o n W a g o n , J e e p Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ag e : 6 5 M As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Sl o w i n g / S t o p p i n g So b r i e t y : H N B D Ve h T y p e : SO U T Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 4 LI N C O L N NA V I G A T O R Sp o r t U t i l i t y V e h i c l e Se t t i n g s f o r Q u e r y : St r e e t : C A R L S B A D B L Cr o s s S t r e e t : T A M A R A C K A V So r t e d B y : D a t e a n d T i m e Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 10 8 of 35 6 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 1 of 19 Memorandum To: Lauren Ferrell, PE, QSD/P - City of Carlsbad Cc: Nathan Schmidt - City of Carlsbad From: Mario Tambellini, PE, TE Nicole Scappaticci, PE Date: December 2, 2022 Subject: Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis INTRODUCTION This memorandum has been prepared to present a mobility analysis for the proposed Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project (Project) located in the City of Carlsbad, California (City). This analysis evaluates vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian modes of travel through the study area. The mobility analysis includes evaluation of intersection level of service (LOS), queueing, operations, multimodal operations LOS (MMLOS), and safety. Four (4) Project alternatives are evaluated and compared under baseline and future conditions. This memorandum includes the following sections: •Existing Study Facilities •Project Alternatives and Study Analysis Scenarios •Analysis Methodology •Intersection Operations •Multimodal Level of Service •Safety Evaluation •Project Alternatives Evaluation •Conclusion EXISTING STUDY FACILITIES STUDY INTERSECTION This analysis focuses on the intersection Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue. The Project location and study limits are shown in Figure 1. Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue is currently signalized and contains pedestrian crosswalks on the north and east legs. The northbound and southbound approaches currently include protected left-turn phasing and the eastbound and westbound approaches include split phasing. The study area consists of the following roadway segments that make up the four approaches of the study intersection: Carlsbad Boulevard: A four-lane roadway that runs north-south between the City limits. The posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour (mph) north of Tamarack Avenue and 35 mph south of Tamarack Avenue. Based on the City of Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element (Mobility Element), Carlsbad Boulevard is designated as an Identity Street north of Tamarack Avenue and as a Coastal Street south of Tamarack Avenue. The southbound approach of the study intersection includes two through lanes, a southbound left-turn pocket, Exhibit 4 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 109 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 2 of 19 and a signal-controlled channelized southbound right-turn lane. The northbound approach includes one through lane, a shared through-right turn lane, and a northbound left-turn pocket. Tamarack Avenue: Within the study area, Tamarack Avenue is a two-lane roadway with a two-way left-turn lane that generally runs east-west between Carlsbad Boulevard and College Boulevard. The posted speed limit is 30 mph west of Skyline Road and 35 mph east of Skyline Road. Tamarack Avenue forms the westbound approach of the study intersection and contains one shared through-right turn lane and a left- turn pocket. Based on the Mobility Element, Tamarack Avenue is designated as a Neighborhood Connector Street. Beach Access Road: The Beach Access Road is a local access road that provides access to a Tamarack State Beach parking lot. There is no posted speed on this road, however, speeds can be assumed to be 25 mph or less. The Beach Access Road forms the eastbound approach to the study intersection and contains a shared through-left turn lane, and a stop-controlled channelized right-turn lane. Redwood Avenue: Redwood Avenue is a two-lane east-west roadway that forms a full access side-street stop-controlled intersection with Carlsbad Boulevard approximately 300 feet north of Tamarack Avenue. Based on the Mobility Element, Redwood Avenue is designated as a Village Street. Sequoia Avenue: Sequoia Avenue is a two-lane east-west roadway that forms a full access side-street stop- controlled intersection with Carlsbad Boulevard approximately 300 feet south of Tamarack Avenue. Based on the Mobility Element, Sequoia Avenue is designated as a Local/Neighborhood Street MMLOS STUDY SEGMENTS MMLOS analysis was performed for the following roadway segments: • Carlsbad Boulevard between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue (South Leg) • Carlsbad Boulevard between Redwood Avenue and Tamarack Avenue (North Leg) • Tamarack Avenue between Carlsbad Boulevard and Garfield Street (East Leg) • Carlsbad Boulevard between Sequoia Avenue and the south end of the Bridge (Bridge) July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 110 of 356 Study Area and Project LocationCarlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Mobility AnalysisCarlsbad, CA December 2022\\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\_GIS\Tasks\Location_and_Facilities_Map.mxd 9/1/2022 12:31:42 PM nscappaticci Figure 1 NORTH 0 500250 Feet Legend !(Study Intersection* * July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 111 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 4 of 19 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE, AND TRANSIT FACILITIES Existing Pedestrian Facilities Within the study area, sidewalks exist along both sides of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue. Sidewalk along the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard south of Tamarack Avenue is relatively narrow and buffered by a guardrail. Sidewalk along the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard north of Tamarack Avenue is buffered by a landscaped area. Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue contains pedestrian crosswalks with push buttons, countdown signal heads, and curb ramps on the north and east legs of the intersection. Existing Bicycle Facilities The City of Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element and Carlsbad Bikeway Master Plan references three (3) bikeway facility types, consistent with Caltrans definitions, as follows: • Class I Bikeway (bike path) – provides a separated corridor that is not served by streets and highways and is away from the influence of parallel streets. Class I bikeways are for non-vehicle use only with opportunities for direct access and recreational benefits, right-of-way for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians, and cross flow conflicts are minimized. • Class II Bikeway (bike lane) – provides a delineated right-of-way assigned to bicyclists to enable more predictable movements, accommodating bicyclists through corridors where insufficient room exists for side-by-side sharing of existing streets by motorists and bicyclists. • Class III Bikeway (bike route) – shared facility that serves either continuity to other bicycle facilities or designates preferred routes through high demand corridors. Class II bikeways (bike lanes) exist on the following facilities: • Northbound and southbound Carlsbad Boulevard within the study area. • Eastbound and westbound Tamarack Avenue within the study area. Existing Transit Facilities Transit in the City of Carlsbad includes North County Transit District (NCTD) transit service, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) paratransit service, the COASTER commuter rail, and Amtrak rail service. Bus stops exist within the immediate study area on northbound Carlsbad Boulevard, approximately 170 feet north of Tamarack Avenue, and on southbound Carlsbad Boulevard within the porkchop island on the west leg of the intersection. Both stops contain signage and benches, however, there are currently no pedestrian facilities providing access to the stop on southbound Carlsbad Boulevard. The bus stops are serviced by Route 101 of the NCTD (referred to as the “BREEZE”). Currently, Route 101 provides service along Highway 101 between Oceanside Transit Center in Oceanside and UTC Transit Center in San Diego. Service is provided seven days a week with approximately 30-minute headways throughout the day and hourly headways in the evenings. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES AND STUDY ANALYSIS SCENARIOS PROPOSED ALTERNATIVES This analysis studies the following four Project alternatives: No Build: This alternative represents a baseline condition in which no improvements have been made to the study intersection. Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: This alternative represents a signalized condition in which the following improvements have been made: • New striping along Carlsbad Boulevard between Hemlock Avenue and just south of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge, along Tamarack Avenue approximately 175 feet east of Carlsbad Boulevard, and along the Beach Access Road approximately 100 feet west of Carlsbad Boulevard. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 112 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 5 of 19 • Addition of high visibility pedestrian crossings on all four legs of the study intersection and on the east leg of the Carlsbad Boulevard & Sequoia Avenue intersection. • Bulb-outs at pedestrian curb ramps. • A parking lane and buffered bike lane on the west side of Carlsbad Boulevard north of Tamarack Avenue. • Green-striped bike lane area. • A new midblock pedestrian crossing with Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) on Carlsbad Boulevard, approximately 680 feet south of the study intersection. • New pedestrian curb ramps at all crossings on the study intersection and on the east leg of the Carlsbad Boulevard & Sequoia Avenue intersection. • Removal of the southbound channelized right-turn lane and conversion of one southbound through lane to a shared-through right lane. • Bus stop pullouts on Carlsbad Boulevard north and south of Tamarack Avenue. • Reduction of southbound Carlsbad Boulevard to one lane just before the proposed midblock crossing. • Signal modification to include pedestrian phases for the west and south legs. The signal is assumed to remain actuated uncoordinated. Under the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative, the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Redwood Avenue would remain full-access, however, the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Sequoia Avenue would be converted to right-in/right-out only. Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative: This alternative represents a signalized condition that consists of all the improvements included in the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative but omits the lane reduction on southbound Carlsbad Boulevard south of Tamarack Avenue. Carlsbad Boulevard would remain a 4-lane corridor throughout the project limits. Roundabout Intersection Alternative: This alternative consists of all the improvements included in the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative, plus additional buffered bike lanes and wider sidewalks, but would construct a single lane roundabout at the study intersection. Carlsbad Boulevard would narrow to two lanes starting at Cherry Avenue and would widen back to four lanes south of the bridge. This alternative assumes installation of a metering signal on the eastbound approach (west leg) with queue detection on the northbound approach (south leg) located approximately 500 feet south of the yield line. The intersections of Carlsbad Boulevard with Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue would remain full access. The three “improved” Project alternatives are shown in Attachment A. STUDY ANALYSIS SCENARIOS The Study intersection was evaluated under the following scenarios: • Existing Conditions: Existing traffic volumes from counts. • Cumulative Conditions: A near-term scenario representing existing traffic volumes plus traffic projected to be generated from approved and reasonably foreseeable pending projects that are expected to influence the study area and intersection. • Horizon Year 2035 Conditions: a future year scenario based on growth found in the Transportation Forecast Information Center (TFIC) as part of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) ABM2+/2021 Regional Transportation Demand Model (RTDM). The study intersection was evaluated under the following time periods: • Typical Weekday AM peak hour • Typical Weekday PM peak hour • Summer Weekend (Saturday) midday peak hour July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 113 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 6 of 19 TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing Traffic Volumes Vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian counts were collected at all existing study intersections during weekday AM (7AM-9AM) and PM (4PM-6PM) peak periods and weekend midday (11AM-1PM) peak periods. Intersection counts were collected on Thursday, May 12, 2022, when school was in session, as well as during two (2) summer Saturdays, June 18, 2022 and June 25, 2022. The two summer Saturday counts were taken to satisfy the City’s Local Coastal Program requirement that quantitative analyses be prepared using data from peak beach use periods collected during two weekends between Memorial Day and Labor Day. Both days of summer Saturday midday intersection counts were averaged for use in this analysis. AM and PM peak period counts for the intersections of Carlsbad Boulevard with Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue were provided by the City and were collected on Tuesday, August 27, 2019. The 2019 counts at Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue were adjusted/balanced to match new 2022 counts at the adjacent Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection. 24-hr Average daily traffic (ADT) counts were collected on the segment of Carlsbad Boulevard south of Tamarack Avenue on Thursday, June 30, 2022, and during two (2) summer Saturdays, June 18, 2022 and June 25, 2022 for use in the MMLOS analysis. Traffic volume count sheets are included in Attachment B. Cumulative Conditions Traffic Volumes Cumulative conditions represent a future condition where traffic from approved and reasonably foreseeable pending projects is added to Existing volumes on the study roadway network. A list of cumulative projects was provided by City staff and is shown in Table 1 below. Trip generation, distribution, and assignment for each project is included in Attachment C. Table 1. Cumulative Projects Project Address Description 3060 State Street Restaurant 3060 State Street 1,358 sf restaurant & outdoor patio converted from existing vacant commercial building. Carlsbad by the Sea Summerhouse 2710 Ocean Street Consolidation of 5 Parcels for new 40,000 sq ft professional services building for memory care and independent living. Chinquapin Coastal Homes 330 Chinquapin Avenue Three triplex buildings containing nine airspace condominium units. Garfield Beach Homes 3570 Garfield Street Construction of 12 single family dwelling units. Vigilucci’s Seafood & Steakhouse 3878 Carlsbad Boulevard Addition of a 1,925 sf to the patio area to accommodate 104 seats for dining use. Horizon Year (2035) Conditions Traffic Volumes Horizon Year conditions represent a year 2035 condition with traffic volumes developed using SANDAG RTDM forecasts at the Project location. The current ABM2+/2021 model forecasts for 2016 and 2035 were used to find yearly growth rates for each leg of Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue. The model indicated no growth or negative growth at the intersection, ranging from -0.71% to 0.0% per year. Growth rates were applied to Cumulative conditions traffic volumes at the intersection between 2022 and 2035 to determine Horizon Year conditions traffic volumes. SANDAG RTDM ABM2+/2021 forecasts for 2016 and 2035 are contained in Attachment D. Intersection volumes at Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue under weekday AM, PM, and Summer Saturday conditions for Existing, Cumulative, and Horizon Year scenarios are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Note July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 114 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 7 of 19 that under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives, the westbound left-turn volumes and southbound left-turn volumes at the Carlsbad Boulevard and Sequoia Avenue intersection are re-routed to the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection. Figure 2. Weekday AM and PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Figure 3. Summer Saturday Midday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS Traffic operations in this study have been quantified through the determination of “Level of Service” (LOS). Level of Service is a qualitative measure of traffic operating conditions, whereby a letter grade “A” through “F” is assigned to an intersection or roadway segment, representing progressively worsening traffic Existing AM(PM) Cumulative AM(PM) Horizon Year AM(PM) Existing SAT Cumulative SAT Horizon Year SAT July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 115 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 8 of 19 operations. LOS “A” represents free-flow conditions with little to no delays, while LOS “F” represents jammed or grid-lock conditions. Intersection LOS has been calculated for the roundabout and signalized intersection control types using methods documented in the Transportation Research Board Publication Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition (HCM). For signalized intersections and roundabouts, the intersection delays and LOS reported are the “average” values for the whole intersection. The delay based HCM 6th Edition LOS criteria are outlined in Table 2. Table 2. HCM 6th Edition Intersection LOS Thresholds Level of Service Description Intersection Control Delay for Signals and Roundabouts (seconds/vehicle) A Free-flow conditions with negligible to minimal delays. < 10 B Good progression with slight delays. > 10 – 20 C Relatively higher delays. > 20 – 35 D Somewhat congested conditions with longer but tolerable delays. > 35 – 55 E Congested conditions with significant delays. > 55 – 80 F Jammed or grid-lock type operating conditions. > 80 Source: HCM 6th Edition Exhibit 20-2. This analysis adheres to the City of Carlsbad Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (April 2018). Table 3- 1 of the General Plan Mobility Element indicates that based on the typologies of the three main approaches of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue, the intersection is not subject to vehicular LOS standards. However, for the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that City roadways and intersections should strive to maintain LOS D or better operations during peak periods, when possible. SIMTRAFFIC SOFTWARE PARAMETERS SimTraffic 11 microsimulation software was used to evaluate the study intersections under the signalized No Build, Signalized 3-Lane, and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection alternatives. SimTraffic software was chosen because it can more accurately model the interaction of the study intersection with the closely spaced adjacent intersections of Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue, as well as provide a more nuanced evaluation of the differences between the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative operations. The model network included the side-street stop-controlled intersections of Carlsbad Boulevard with Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue. Existing signal timing data at the study intersection was provided by City staff. Ten (10), 1-hour model runs (with a 10-minute warm-up period) were run and averaged to obtain 95th percentile queueing results and intersection delay at all study intersections. SIDRA SOFTWARE PARAMETERS Sidra 9 roundabout analysis software was used to analyze the Roundabout Intersection Alternative. The HCM 6 Capacity Methodology in Sidra was used to analyze the intersection and includes various calibration factors. The Entry/Circulating Flow Adjustment calibration factor is a parameter that can be adjusted to avoid underestimation of capacities at low circulating flows and for Unbalanced Flow conditions. Higher values result in reduced follow-up headway and critical gap values (increased capacity). Page 244 of the Sidra Intersection 9 User Guide states that Unbalanced Flow occurs at a roundabout when the circulating flow mostly originates from one (dominant) approach and is highly queued on the approach before entering the roundabout. Unbalanced Flow is projected to occur under PM peak hour conditions, with the northbound approach being the dominant approach. This analysis utilized a “High” Entry/Circulating Flow Adjustment factor as it better accounts for the projected Unbalanced Flow conditions and reflects local driver familiarity with roundabouts due to the recently constructed and planned roundabouts on Carlsbad Boulevard at State July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 116 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 9 of 19 Street and Canon Road, respectively. In addition, the “High” Entry/Circulating Flow Adjustment factor results in Critical Gap and Follow-Up Headway values that are generally in line with measured values from multiple California sites presented in the Roundabout Geometric Design Guidance Final Report (Prepared for Caltrans by the University of Nevada, Reno, June 2007). This analysis also checked the “SIDRA Model for Unbalanced Flow Conditions for HCM 6” option in the Options tab to better model Unbalanced Flow conditions consistent with recommendations in the Sidra Intersection 9 User Guide. GENERAL MODELING ASSUMPTIONS A peak hour factor of 1.0 was used for all model scenarios in order to design the project to peak hour conditions instead of peak 15-minute conditions, and consistent with existing observed study area peak hour factors that are close to 1.0. Pedestrian and bicycle volumes were included in all SimTraffic and Sidra models in order to capture the effects of the relatively large multimodal volumes. QUEUEING ANALYSIS 95th Percentile queuing for all movements at Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue was evaluated against existing and proposed available storage space using SimTraffic and Sidra software. Storage space for turn lanes was based on turn pocket length and storage space for through movement was based on the distance to the nearest cross street. MMLOS THRESHOLDS MMLOS provides a qualitative “grade” assigned to specified travel modes, ranging from a LOS A to LOS F. As outlined in the City’s General Plan, LOS A reflects a high service standard for a travel mode (e.g., outstanding characteristics and experience for that mode) and LOS F would reflect a poor service standard for a travel mode (e.g. congestion for vehicles, no bicycle, pedestrian, or transit facilities, etc.) MMLOS evaluates the safety and quality of access and mobility for pedestrian, bicyclist, and transit users using methods documented in the Carlsbad General Plan Mobility Element, Chapter 3. The General Plan Mobility Element classifies and identifies street typology for each street in the City. As published in the General Plan Mobility Element, the MMLOS for the various travel modes were evaluated according to the following factors: • Vehicular LOS: Level of service was determined by the most recent version of the HCM. This methodology evaluates vehicles based on their freedom to maneuver and overall delay experienced at intersections. • Pedestrian LOS: Level of service was evaluated using the Carlsbad MMLOS method. This method evaluates the quality of the pedestrian system (e.g., number of vehicle lanes that need to be crossed and the speed of adjacent traffic) and the friendliness of the infrastructure at intersections (e.g. pedestrian countdown heads, dedicated pedestrian phases (e.g. a scramble phase), curb extensions, refuge median). • Bicycle LOS: Level of service was evaluated using the Carlsbad MMLOS method. This method evaluates the quality of the bicycle system (e.g., bicycle route, bicycle lanes, or bicycle pathway; presence of bicycle buffers from the vehicle travel way), the amenities of the system (e.g., presence of bicycle parking), and the friendliness of the infrastructure (e.g., bicycle detection at intersections, pavement conditions, presence of vehicle parking). • Transit LOS: Level of service was evaluated using the Carlsbad MMLOS method. This method evaluates the transit vehicle right-of-way (e.g., dedicated or shared, signal priority), hours and frequency of service (e.g., weekday/weekend hours, peak period headway); performance (e.g., on- time or late); amenities and safety (e.g., lighting, covered stop, bench, on-board bike/surfboard storage); and connectivity (e.g., to other transit routes, employment areas, schools, visitor attractions, and other major destinations). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 117 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 10 of 19 The Carlsbad MMLOS Tool is an Excel based qualitative mobility analysis spreadsheet and was used to complete the MMLOS analysis for the Project. The Carlsbad MMLOS Tool calculates a score and corresponding LOS for each direction of travel on a study segment. The total score thresholds are outlined in Table 3. Table 3. MMLOS Thresholds Level of Service Point Score A 90 – 100 B 80 – 89 C 70 – 79 D 60 – 69 E 50 – 59 F 0 – 49 Source: City of Carlsbad General Plan: Mobility Element The City’s General Plan classifies Carlsbad Boulevard as an Identity Street north of Tamarack Avenue and a Coastal Street south of Tamarack Avenue, and Tamarack Avenue is classified as a Neighborhood Connector Street. Identity Street, Coastal Street, and Neighborhood Street typologies are subject to a MMLOS standard for the following modes: Pedestrian and Bicycle travel. Per Policy 3-P.4 in the General Plan Mobility Element, the study area pedestrian and bicycle facilities should maintain LOS D or better. As published in Table 3-1 of the City’s General Plan, Transit is not subject to a MMLOS standard. INTERSECTION OPERATIONS INTERSECTION DELAY AND LOS Intersection LOS results are shown in Table 4 for all alternatives and scenarios. As shown in Table 4, the study intersection would operate at LOS C or better under all scenarios. The SimTraffic and Sidra delay outputs are included in Attachment E. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 118 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 11 of 19 Table 4. Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue Intersection LOS Alternative Control Type Peak Hour Existing Cumulative Horizon Year Delay (s/veh)1 LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS No Build Signal AM 13.9 B 13.7 B 13.3 B PM 23.7 C 24.6 C 23.6 C SAT 24.4 C 25.1 C 24.9 C 3-Lane Alt Signal AM 17.6 B 17.1 B 17.2 B PM 26.9 C 26.8 C 26.6 C SAT 30.3 C 30.8 C 29.8 C 4-Lane Alt Signal AM 17.4 B 17.8 B 17.1 B PM 26.0 C 26.9 C 25.6 C SAT 29.6 C 30.6 C 29.1 C Roundabout Roundabout AM 3.9 A 4.0 A 3.6 A PM 18.8 B 22.0 C 15.7 B SAT 13.2 B 15.5 B 12.5 B Notes: Bold values indicate LOS E or F. 1Average control delay is reported for signalized and roundabout control types. INTERSECTION QUEUEING Table 5 shows the 95th percentile queueing at each movement compared to the available storage length. In the SimTraffic model, when 95th percentile queues for the northbound and southbound through movements exceeded the available storage (i.e., the distance between Tamarack Avenue and Redwood Avenue or between Tamarack Avenue and Sequoia Avenue), through queues were calculated by combining the corresponding northbound or southbound queue lengths at the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection and the next adjacent intersection in the model. SimTraffic and Sidra queueing results are included in Attachment E. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 119 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 12 of 19 Table 5. 95th Percentile Intersection Queueing Alternative Movement Storage (ft)1 95th Percentile Queues (ft) Existing Cumulative Horizon Year AM PM SAT AM PM SAT AM PM SAT No Build NBL 70 37 119 109 30 122 143 31 112 110 NBT 230 89 488 291 93 502 321 88 446 294 SBL 115 61 136 132 59 137 143 61 131 151 SBT 235 113 145 194 115 142 215 111 150 206 SBR 70 15 23 90 0 23 89 0 24 101 EBT 235 36 64 69 33 61 78 31 69 76 EBR 30 5 22 24 0 24 29 4 27 28 WBL 75 124 115 124 124 118 133 113 117 124 WBT 450 65 97 123 80 103 138 76 117 114 3-Lane Alternative NBL 115 38 133 133 39 133 129 32 119 105 NBT 230 105 539 314 98 535 332 103 495 305 SBL 97 75 162 209 78 165 213 74 167 213 SBT 235 177 209 336 166 203 348 167 222 325 EBT 235 34 64 75 34 63 75 40 59 74 EBR 30 0 7 28 4 18 26 0 4 29 WBL 93 163 138 176 169 140 178 158 127 162 WBT 450 121 126 178 143 135 194 140 108 157 4-Lane Alternative NBL 115 38 137 124 37 130 136 34 118 132 NBT 230 104 536 316 109 535 335 102 500 317 SBL 97 73 146 159 69 137 192 69 137 168 SBT 235 129 171 234 139 152 272 120 154 260 EBT 235 37 60 78 37 65 70 32 58 68 EBR 30 0 10 36 4 19 26 0 13 23 WBL 93 165 136 171 171 143 172 160 132 157 WBT 450 133 126 160 150 127 190 130 119 137 Roundabout Alternative NB 215 7 117 85 8 135 97 7 99 83 SB 220 44 24 109 46 25 122 41 23 106 EB 260 5 10 28 5 10 29 5 10 28 WB 450 23 25 28 24 25 75 21 22 61 Notes: Bold values indicate queues that exceed storage length. 1Storage reported is available queueing length within a turn pocket or the length of a through lane before nearest conflicting cross- street. 2 Where multiple lanes exist for one movement, queue reported is the highest for that movement. Left-Turn Queueing As shown in Table 5, under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives, queueing would exceed proposed turn pocket length for the northbound, southbound, and westbound left-turn movement during at least one peak hour under all scenarios. Minimum turn pocket lengths to accommodate maximum projected left-turn queues under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives are as follows: July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 120 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 13 of 19 Northbound Left-Turn Pocket Length o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: 135 feet o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative: 140 feet • Southbound Left-Turn: o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: 215 feet o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative: 195 feet • Westbound Left-Turn: o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: 180 feet o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative: 175 feet If the above turn pocket lengths are not feasible to implement based on geometric constraints, it is recommended to make the turn pockets as long as feasible. Note that as shown in Attachment A, the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives propose removal of the existing two-way left-turn median lane on Tamarack Avenue. Leaving a portion of the existing two-way left-turn lane could also accommodate southbound left-turn queueing without lengthening the turn pocket. Northbound and Southbound Through Movement Queueing Northbound and southbound queueing are projected to exceed available storage during at least one peak hour for all scenarios under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives. Worst- case southbound queues under the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative would be 348 feet long (back of queue would pass Redwood Avenue Avenue) under Cumulative Summer Saturday conditions. Worst-case southbound queues under the Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative would be 272 feet long and are projected to be better than those under the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative due to the fact that the lane reduction of southbound Carlsbad Avenue south of Tamarack Avenue would not occur under this Alternative. It is recommended that “Keep Clear” striping is used on Carlsbad boulevard at Redwood Avenue to allow for full access (left-turns in and out) to be maintained at Redwood Avenue. Worst-case northbound queues are projected to be 539 feet and 536 feet long under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives, respectively, reaching back to the northern end of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge. As the intersection of Sequoia Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard would be converted to right-in/right-out only under these Alternatives, no queueing-related improvements are recommended at the Carlsbad Boulevard & Sequoia Avenue intersection. It should be noted that under worst-case conditions, both the northbound and southbound queues were observed to clear the intersection in one cycle. Under the Roundabout Intersection Alternative, queueing on all approaches is shown to fit within the available storage space. Eastbound Queueing Eastbound shared left/through queueing is projected to fit within available storage under all scenarios and alternatives. Eastbound right-turn queueing is shown to slightly exceed the short, channelized right-turn pocket during the Existing Summer Saturday Peak Hour for the Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative. However as there is additional storage space along the drive aisle before reaching the beach parking lot, queue storage is assumed to be adequate for this approach under all scenarios and alternatives. Queueing at Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue The effect of the Project alternatives on queueing at the intersections of Carlsbad Boulevard with Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue was evaluated. Redwood Avenue is proposed to remain full-access under all alternatives and Sequoia Avenue is proposed to be converted to right-in/right-out only under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives. Results showed that worst-case queueing at Redwood Avenue occurred during the Existing Saturday peak hour under the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative conditions. Maximum 95th percentile westbound July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 121 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 14 of 19 and southbound left-turn queues at Redwood Avenue are projected to be 40 feet and 30 feet, respectively, which would both fit within available storage space. Results showed that worst-case queueing at Sequoia Avenue occurred during the Cumulative PM peak hour under the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative conditions. Maximum 95th percentile westbound queues at Sequoia Avenue are projected to be 26 feet, which would fit within available storage space. As worst-case northbound left-turn queueing at Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue is projected to be 137 feet, there may not be enough space to retain the southbound left-turn pocket at Sequoia Avenue under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives. Therefore, it is recommended that Sequoia Avenue operate with right-in/right-out control under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives as proposed. However, since there would be no northbound left-turn pocket at the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection under the Roundabout Intersection Alternative, there would be adequate room to provide a southbound left- turn pocket at Sequoia Avenue under the Roundabout Intersection Alternative. Maximum 95th percentile southbound left-turn queues at Sequoia Avenue are projected to be 25 feet, which would fit within available storage. MULTIMODAL LEVEL OF SERVICE Pedestrian and Bicycle MMLOS for the three main approaches of the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection, as well as the segment of Carlsbad Boulevard between Sequoia Avenue and the south end of the bridge, were evaluated for all alternatives under Existing conditions. Cumulative and Horizon Year scenario analysis was omitted because Cumulative ADT volumes showed only a very slight increase over Existing ADTs and projected Horizon Year ADTs were lower than Existing ADTs. As such, Horizon Year and Cumulative condition MMLOS results were projected to be the same as Existing MMLOS results. In addition to roadway ADT, the City MMLOS Tool takes into account inputs such as sidewalk and bike lane widths, speed limit, presence of pedestrian and bike lane buffers, and traffic calming features such as bulb-outs and high visibility crosswalks. MMLOS was evaluated for the No Build Alternative, the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative, the Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative, and the Roundabout Intersection Alternative. Pedestrian LOS for the segment of Carlsbad Boulevard between Sequoia Avenue and the south end of the bridge is better under the Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative and Roundabout Intersection Alternative than under the Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative, as the roadway would be narrower at the midblock crossing, allowing pedestrians to cross fewer lanes. Table 6 shows the pedestrian and bicycle scores and LOS for each direction of the study segments. As shown in Table 6, the Project improvement alternatives were found to provide notably better pedestrian LOS and similar or better bicycle LOS over No Build. MMLOS reports can be found in Attachment F. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 122 of 356 Fi n a l Ca r l s b a d B o u l e v a r d a n d T a m a r a c k A v e n u e In t e r s e c t i o n Im p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t Mo b i l i t y A n a l y s i s 15 of 19 Ta b l e 6. MM L O S R e s u l t s Se g m e n t No B u i l d 3-La n e A l t e r n a t i v e 4-La n e A l t e r n a t i v e Ro u n d a b o u t A l t e r n a t i v e Pe d e s t r i a n Bi c y c l e Pe d e s t r i a n Bi c y c l e Pe d e s t r i a n Bi c y c l e Pe d e s t r i a n Bi c y c l e NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B NB / E B SB / W B Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Sc o r e LO S Ca r l s b a d B l v d ( s o u t h l e g ) – Se q u o i a A v e t o T a m a r a c k A v e 45 F 55 E 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 90 A 90 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 90 A 90 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A Ca r l s b a d B l v d ( n o r t h l e g ) – Ta m a r a c k A v e t o R e d w o o d A v e 70 C 70 C 95 A 10 0 A 95 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 85 B 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A Ta m a r a c k A v e ( e a s t l e g ) – Ca r l s b a d B l v d t o G a r f i e l d S t 80 B 80 B 95 A 95 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 95 A 95 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 95 A 95 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 95 A 95 A Ca r l s b a d B l v d ( b r i d g e ) – Se q u o i a t o s o u t h e n d o f B r i d g e 45 F 45 F 10 0 A 10 0 A 95 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 85 B 95 A 10 0 A 90 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A 10 0 A No t e s : So u r c e : C i t y o f C a r l s b a d M M L O S T o o l Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 12 3 of 35 6 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 16 of 19 SAFETY EVALUATION This section discusses the collision history in the vicinity of the study intersection. Approximately fourteen years of crash data (January 2008 – July 2022) were provided by the City to identify high collision locations and common collision characteristics. Table 7 summarizes the collisions in the study area and describes the collision severity (fatal, serious injury, other visible injury, complaint of pain, and property damage (PDO)) and the collision type (broadside, sideswipe, rear-end, hit object). Table 7. Project Area Crash Data Summary: Severity & Type Intersection Severity Type Primary Collision Factor Cr a s h e s Fa t a l Se r i o u s I n j u r y Ot h e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n PD O Br o a d s i d e Si d e s w i p e Re a r - E n d Hi t O b j e c t Ot h e r No t S t a t e d DU I Un s a f e S p e e d Im p r o p e r T u r n i n g Un s a f e St a r t / B a c k i n g Tr a f f i c S i g n a l s & Si g n s Ot h e r Carlsbad Boulevard & Redwood Avenue 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue 11 0 0 4 5 2 1 2 5 1 1 1 4 2 2 2 1 0 Carlsbad Boulevard & Sequoia Avenue 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 Tamarack Avenue & Garfield Street 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Total 18 0 0 5 8 5 2 4 8 2 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2 As shown in Table 7, the majority of collisions occurred at the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue. The most common type of collision was rear-end, followed by sideswipe collisions. The most common primary collision factors were driving under the influence, unsafe speed, improper turning, and unsafe starting or backing. Implementation of traffic calming measures proposed in the Project improvement alternatives would potentially help reduce the number of collisions caused by unsafe speed. Installation of a roundabout at Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue could potentially reduce the number of collisions due to Traffic Signals and Signs. Attachment G contains raw collision data for the study area. PROJECT ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION The Project alternatives were evaluated based on a point system associated with the lowest projected vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle LOS for each alternative, where LOS A represents 6 points, LOS B represents 5 points, LOS C represents 4 points, LOS D represents 3 points, LOS E represents 2 points, and LOS F represents 1 point. Additionally, queueing was evaluated by assigning points based on the worst-case 95th percentile queues where 0-100 feet of queueing represents 6 points, 101-200 feet represents 5 points, 201-300 feet represents 4 points, 301-400 feet represents 3 points, 401-500 feet represents 2 points, and 501+ feet represent 1 point. Table 8 provides a comparison between each alternative based on this system. As shown in Table 8, the Roundabout Intersection Alternative provides the best overall score based on vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle LOS and queueing. In addition to providing acceptable LOS and reasonable queueing, the Roundabout Intersection Alternative would also enhance the pedestrian and bicycle experience and improve safety in the study area. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 124 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 17 of 19 Table 8. Alternatives Comparison LOS Type Points No Build 3-Lane Alt 4-Lane Alt Roundabout Vehicular LOS 4 4 4 4 Pedestrian LOS 1 6 5 6 Bicycle LOS 6 6 6 6 Worst-Case Queueing 1 1 1 5 Total 12 17 16 21 Notes: LOS A = 6 points, LOS B = 5 points, LOS C = 4 points, LOS D = 3 points, LOS E = 2 points, LOS F = 1 point Queueing: 0-100 ft = 6 points, 101-200 ft = 5 points, 201-300 ft = 4 points, 301-400 ft = 3 points, 401- 500 ft = 2 pts, 501+ ft = 1 point CONCLUSION INTERSECTION LOS The intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue would operate at LOS D or better under all scenarios. INTERSECTION QUEUEING Under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives, queueing would exceed proposed turn pocket length for the northbound, southbound, and westbound left-turn movement during at least one peak hour under all scenarios. Minimum turn pocket lengths to accommodate maximum projected left-turn queues under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives are as follows: o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: 135 feet o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative: 140 feet • Southbound Left-Turn: o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: 215 feet o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative: 195 feet • Westbound Left-Turn: o Signalized 3-Lane Intersection Alternative: 180 feet o Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternative: 175 feet If the above turn pocket lengths are not feasible to implement based on geometric constraints, it is recommended to make the turn pockets as long as feasible. Worst-case northbound and southbound queues under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives would extend to the north end of the Agua Hedionda Lagoon bridge and past Redwood Avenue, respectively. It is recommended that “Keep Clear” striping is used on Carlsbad Boulevard at Redwood Avenue to allow for full access (left-turns in and out) to be maintained at Redwood Avenue. As the intersection of Sequoia Avenue and Carlsbad Boulevard would be converted to right-in/right-out only under these Alternatives, no queueing-related improvements are recommended at the Carlsbad Boulevard & Sequoia Avenue intersection. It should be noted that under worst-case conditions, both the northbound and southbound queues were observed to clear the intersection in one cycle. Northbound Left-Turn• n: July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 125 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 18 of 19 Under the Roundabout Intersection Alternative, queueing on all approaches are shown to fit within the available storage. Redwood Avenue is proposed to remain full-access under all alternatives and Sequoia Avenue is proposed to be converted to right-in/right-out only under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives. Worst-case queueing at Redwood Avenue and Sequoia Avenue was shown to fit within available storage space. As worst-case northbound left-turn queueing at Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue is projected to be 137 feet, there may not be enough space to retain the southbound left-turn pocket at Sequoia Avenue under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives. Therefore, it is recommended that Sequoia Avenue operate with right-in/right-out control under the Signalized 3-Lane and Signalized 4-Lane Intersection Alternatives as proposed. However, since there would be no northbound left- turn pocket at the Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue intersection under the Roundabout Intersection Alternative, there would be adequate room to provide a southbound left-turn pocket at Sequoia Avenue under the Roundabout Intersection Alternative. Maximum 95th percentile southbound left-turn queues at Sequoia Avenue are projected to be 25 feet, which would fit within available storage. MMLOS The Project improvement alternatives were found to provide notably better pedestrian LOS and similar or better bicycle LOS over No Build conditions. SAFETY EVALUATION The majority of collisions occurred at the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue. The most common type of collision was rear-end, followed by sideswipe collisions. The most common primary collision factors were driving under the influence, unsafe speed, improper turning, and unsafe starting or backing. Implementation of traffic calming measures proposed in the Project improvement alternatives would potentially help reduce the number of collisions caused by unsafe speed. Installation of a roundabout at Carlsbad Boulevard & Tamarack Avenue could potentially reduce the number of collisions due to Traffic Signals and Signs. ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION The Project alternatives were evaluated based on a point system associated with the lowest projected vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle LOS for each alternative, where LOS A represents 6 points, LOS B represents 5 points, LOS C represents 4 points, LOS D represents 3 points, LOS E represents 2 points, and LOS F represents 1 point. Additionally, queueing was evaluated by assigning points based on the worst-case 95th percentile queues where 0-100 feet of queueing represents 6 points, 101-200 feet represents 5 points, 201-300 feet represents 4 points, 301-400 feet represents 3 points, 401-500 feet represents 2 points, and 501+ feet represent 1 point. The Roundabout Intersection Alternative provides the best overall score based on vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle LOS and queueing. In addition to providing acceptable LOS and reasonable queueing, the Roundabout Intersection Alternative would also enhance the pedestrian and bicycle experience and improve safety in the study area. July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 126 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Intersection Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 19 of 19 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Project Alternative Exhibits Attachment B: Traffic Counts Attachment C: Cumulative Project List, Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Attachment D: SANDAG RTDM ABM2/2019 Forecasts for 2016 and 2050 Attachment E: SimTraffic and Sidra Reports Attachment F: MMLOS Reports Attachment G: Collision Data July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 127 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project Mobility Analysis Attachment A: Project Alternative Exhibits July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 128 of 356 Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 12 9 of 35 6 Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 13 0 of 35 6 Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 13 1 of 35 6 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project Mobility Analysis Attachment B: Traffic Counts July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 132 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam AM Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 5/12/2022 Page No : 1 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Total Volume Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 8 71 0 79 26 3 6 35 1 24 8 33 1 2 0 3 150 07:15 AM 11 87 1 99 28 1 12 41 5 29 9 43 1 5 2 8 191 07:30 AM 9 113 2 124 48 2 14 64 3 43 17 63 1 0 1 2 253 07:45 AM 6 118 0 124 57 3 25 85 1 41 13 55 3 1 0 4 268 Total 34 389 3 426 159 9 57 225 10 137 47 194 6 8 3 17 862 08:00 AM 14 104 9 127 62 2 16 80 1 46 12 59 0 1 3 4 270 08:15 AM 12 94 3 109 54 12 11 77 4 53 19 76 1 3 4 8 270 08:30 AM 14 93 6 113 53 8 19 80 8 75 26 109 2 2 0 4 306 08:45 AM 16 93 4 113 29 5 13 47 8 71 20 99 1 2 5 8 267 Total 56 384 22 462 198 27 59 284 21 245 77 343 4 8 12 24 1113 Grand Total 90 773 25 888 357 36 116 509 31 382 124 537 10 16 15 41 1975 Apprch %10.1 87 2.8 70.1 7.1 22.8 5.8 71.1 23.1 24.4 39 36.6 Total %4.6 39.1 1.3 45 18.1 1.8 5.9 25.8 1.6 19.3 6.3 27.2 0.5 0.8 0.8 2.1 Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:45 AM 07:45 AM 6 118 0 124 57 3 25 85 1 41 13 55 3 1 0 4 268 08:00 AM 14 104 9 127 62 2 16 80 1 46 12 59 0 1 3 4 270 08:15 AM 12 94 3 109 54 12 11 77 4 53 19 76 1 3 4 8 270 08:30 AM 14 93 6 113 53 8 19 80 8 75 26 109 2 2 0 4 306 Total Volume 46 409 18 473 226 25 71 322 14 215 70 299 6 7 7 20 1114 % App. Total 9.7 86.5 3.8 70.2 7.8 22 4.7 71.9 23.4 30 35 35 PHF .821 .867 .500 .931 .911 .521 .710 .947 .438 .717 .673 .686 .500 .583 .438 .625 .910 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 133 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam AM Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 5/12/2022 Page No : 2 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Carlsbad Boulevard B e a c h P a r k i n g T a m r a c k A v e n u e Carlsbad Boulevard Right 18 Thru 409 Left 46 InOut Total 292 473 765 Ri g h t 71 Th r u 25 Le f t 22 6 Ou t To t a l In 12 3 32 2 44 5 Left 14 Thru 215 Right 70 Out TotalIn 642 299 941 Le f t 6 Th r u 7 Rig h t 7 To t a l Ou t In 57 20 77 Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 AM Total Volume Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 08:00 AM +0 mins.9 113 2 124 57 3 25 85 1 46 12 59 0 1 3 4 +15 mins.6 118 0 124 62 2 16 80 4 53 19 76 1 3 4 8 +30 mins.14 104 9 127 54 12 11 77 8 75 26 109 2 2 0 4 +45 mins.12 94 3 109 53 8 19 80 8 71 20 99 1 2 5 8 Total Volume 41 429 14 484 226 25 71 322 21 245 77 343 4 8 12 24 % App. Total 8.5 88.6 2.9 70.2 7.8 22 6.1 71.4 22.4 16.7 33.3 50 PHF .732 .909 .389 .953 .911 .521 .710 .947 .656 .817 .740 .787 .500 .667 .600 .750 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 134 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam PM Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 5/12/2022 Page No : 1 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Total Volume Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 28 122 4 154 35 4 23 62 10 243 47 300 8 2 9 19 535 04:15 PM 24 113 2 139 24 3 33 60 6 244 71 321 4 3 10 17 537 04:30 PM 22 115 7 144 27 7 18 52 9 274 73 356 2 7 5 14 566 04:45 PM 24 101 2 127 24 1 5 30 7 215 98 320 2 3 3 8 485 Total 98 451 15 564 110 15 79 204 32 976 289 1297 16 15 27 58 2123 05:00 PM 27 97 3 127 33 4 17 54 14 243 66 323 2 6 5 13 517 05:15 PM 23 84 4 111 24 8 25 57 9 241 63 313 4 6 2 12 493 05:30 PM 20 103 5 128 28 1 20 49 12 227 74 313 4 4 3 11 501 05:45 PM 15 76 3 94 33 1 19 53 9 207 55 271 1 3 5 9 427 Total 85 360 15 460 118 14 81 213 44 918 258 1220 11 19 15 45 1938 Grand Total 183 811 30 1024 228 29 160 417 76 1894 547 2517 27 34 42 103 4061 Apprch %17.9 79.2 2.9 54.7 7 38.4 3 75.2 21.7 26.2 33 40.8 Total %4.5 20 0.7 25.2 5.6 0.7 3.9 10.3 1.9 46.6 13.5 62 0.7 0.8 1 2.5 Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM 04:00 PM 28 122 4 154 35 4 23 62 10 243 47 300 8 2 9 19 535 04:15 PM 24 113 2 139 24 3 33 60 6 244 71 321 4 3 10 17 537 04:30 PM 22 115 7 144 27 7 18 52 9 274 73 356 2 7 5 14 566 04:45 PM 24 101 2 127 24 1 5 30 7 215 98 320 2 3 3 8 485 Total Volume 98 451 15 564 110 15 79 204 32 976 289 1297 16 15 27 58 2123 % App. Total 17.4 80 2.7 53.9 7.4 38.7 2.5 75.3 22.3 27.6 25.9 46.6 PHF .875 .924 .536 .916 .786 .536 .598 .823 .800 .891 .737 .911 .500 .536 .675 .763 .938 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 135 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam PM Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 5/12/2022 Page No : 2 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Carlsbad Boulevard B e a c h P a r k i n g T a m r a c k A v e n u e Carlsbad Boulevard Right 15 Thru 451 Left 98 InOut Total 1071 564 1635 Ri g h t 79 Th r u 15 Le f t 11 0 Ou t To t a l In 40 2 20 4 60 6 Left 32 Thru 976 Right 289 Out TotalIn 588 1297 1885 Le f t 16 Th r u 15 Rig h t 27 To t a l Ou t In 62 58 12 0 Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM Total Volume Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 04:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:00 PM +0 mins.28 122 4 154 33 4 17 54 6 244 71 321 8 2 9 19 +15 mins.24 113 2 139 24 8 25 57 9 274 73 356 4 3 10 17 +30 mins.22 115 7 144 28 1 20 49 7 215 98 320 2 7 5 14 +45 mins.24 101 2 127 33 1 19 53 14 243 66 323 2 3 3 8 Total Volume 98 451 15 564 118 14 81 213 36 976 308 1320 16 15 27 58 % App. Total 17.4 80 2.7 55.4 6.6 38 2.7 73.9 23.3 27.6 25.9 46.6 PHF .875 .924 .536 .916 .894 .438 .810 .934 .643 .891 .786 .927 .500 .536 .675 .763 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 136 of 356 Location: Date: 5/12/2022 N/S: Day: Thursday E/W: North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians 15 3 0 14 32 15 0 0 10 25 13 4 0 16 33 7301222 12 5 1 24 42 15 4 0 22 41 13 13 0 26 52 12 8 0 30 50 102 40 1 154 297 North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians 21 6 0 15 42 23 4 0 19 46 10 1 2 25 38 22 10 0 26 58 18 3 0 33 54 42 12 0 25 79 38 12 0 20 70 16 4 0 17 37 190 52 2 180 424 5:15 PM 5:30 PM 5:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue PEDESTRIANS Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 137 of 356 Location: Date: 5/12/2022 N/S: Day: Thursday E/W: Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 060203011000 13 030101020000 7 030200002000 7 070000020000 9 020000024000 8 090250072000 25 030361170000 21 090000053010 18 0 42 0 10 11 5 1 26 12 0 1 0 108 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 01300001110000 25 070100082000 18 0150100054000 25 01900030161011 41 130404051000 18 01005020100000 27 12903000105000 48 01714020143110 43 2 113 1 18 0 11 1 79 16 1 2 1 245 Tamrack Avenue TOTAL VOLUMES: Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 5:30 PM 5:45 PM Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Eastbound TOTAL VOLUMES: 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 8:45 AM Southbound Westbound Northbound Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad BICYCLES 7:30 AM 7:00 AM 7:15 AM Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 138 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam 6-18 Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 6/18/2022 Page No : 1 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Total Volume Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 20 151 14 185 54 10 30 94 17 129 32 178 6 6 11 23 480 11:15 AM 20 132 7 159 34 4 29 67 12 163 25 200 3 3 7 13 439 11:30 AM 24 142 9 175 27 6 18 51 15 172 40 227 8 6 5 19 472 11:45 AM 27 163 3 193 45 5 22 72 11 206 41 258 3 4 5 12 535 Total 91 588 33 712 160 25 99 284 55 670 138 863 20 19 28 67 1926 12:00 PM 30 125 4 159 44 12 32 88 8 164 50 222 2 4 10 16 485 12:15 PM 18 149 13 180 40 2 21 63 11 201 34 246 4 10 6 20 509 12:30 PM 29 168 11 208 41 0 36 77 10 230 37 277 0 0 17 17 579 12:45 PM 26 143 12 181 42 0 21 63 16 236 24 276 0 0 14 14 534 Total 103 585 40 728 167 14 110 291 45 831 145 1021 6 14 47 67 2107 Grand Total 194 1173 73 1440 327 39 209 575 100 1501 283 1884 26 33 75 134 4033 Apprch %13.5 81.5 5.1 56.9 6.8 36.3 5.3 79.7 15 19.4 24.6 56 Total %4.8 29.1 1.8 35.7 8.1 1 5.2 14.3 2.5 37.2 7 46.7 0.6 0.8 1.9 3.3 Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 27 163 3 193 45 5 22 72 11 206 41 258 3 4 5 12 535 12:00 PM 30 125 4 159 44 12 32 88 8 164 50 222 2 4 10 16 485 12:15 PM 18 149 13 180 40 2 21 63 11 201 34 246 4 10 6 20 509 12:30 PM 29 168 11 208 41 0 36 77 10 230 37 277 0 0 17 17 579 Total Volume 104 605 31 740 170 19 111 300 40 801 162 1003 9 18 38 65 2108 % App. Total 14.1 81.8 4.2 56.7 6.3 37 4 79.9 16.2 13.8 27.7 58.5 PHF .867 .900 .596 .889 .944 .396 .771 .852 .909 .871 .810 .905 .563 .450 .559 .813 .910 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 139 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam 6-18 Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 6/18/2022 Page No : 2 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Carlsbad Boulevard B e a c h P a r k i n g T a m r a c k A v e n u e Carlsbad Boulevard Right 31 Thru 605 Left 104 InOut Total 921 740 1661 Ri g h t 11 1 Th r u 19 Le f t 17 0 Ou t To t a l In 28 4 30 0 58 4 Left 40 Thru 801 Right 162 Out TotalIn 813 1003 1816 Le f t 9 Th r u 18 Rig h t 38 To t a l Ou t In 90 65 15 5 Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 AM Total Volume Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 11:00 AM +0 mins.27 163 3 193 45 5 22 72 8 164 50 222 6 6 11 23 +15 mins.30 125 4 159 44 12 32 88 11 201 34 246 3 3 7 13 +30 mins.18 149 13 180 40 2 21 63 10 230 37 277 8 6 5 19 +45 mins.29 168 11 208 41 0 36 77 16 236 24 276 3 4 5 12 Total Volume 104 605 31 740 170 19 111 300 45 831 145 1021 20 19 28 67 % App. Total 14.1 81.8 4.2 56.7 6.3 37 4.4 81.4 14.2 29.9 28.4 41.8 PHF .867 .900 .596 .889 .944 .396 .771 .852 .703 .880 .725 .921 .625 .792 .636 .728 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 140 of 356 Location:  N/S:  E/W: Date: 6/18/2022 Day: Saturday North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Beach Parking Driveway Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians 28 11 0 8 47 57 12 0 4 73 49 16 0 12 77 26 7 0 10 43 41 11 0 15 67 36 17 0 4 57 58 23 0 1 82 39 12 0 1 52 334 109 0 55 498 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL VOLUMES: 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue PEDESTRIANS Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 141 of 356 Location:  N/S:  E/W: Date: 6/18/2022 Day: Saturday Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 33102010341020 74 13714010406000 90 227180322110100 75 32302010271000 57 01801210291000 52 22224002174011 55 02206141112000 47 42885010273023 81 15 208 12 32 3 12 5 206 28 1 5 4 531 Beach Parking Driveway TOTAL VOLUMES: Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Eastbound 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM Southbound Westbound Northbound Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad BICYCLES 11:30 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 142 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam 6-25 Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 6/25/2022 Page No : 1 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Groups Printed- Total Volume Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 11:00 AM 27 136 9 172 49 7 24 80 15 100 25 140 4 7 9 20 412 11:15 AM 21 136 5 162 52 12 29 93 12 123 30 165 8 7 23 38 458 11:30 AM 21 143 12 176 45 6 32 83 12 128 29 169 3 6 21 30 458 11:45 AM 32 170 13 215 50 11 32 93 10 120 31 161 3 12 10 25 494 Total 101 585 39 725 196 36 117 349 49 471 115 635 18 32 63 113 1822 12:00 PM 18 157 13 188 29 6 33 68 8 136 38 182 10 9 12 31 469 12:15 PM 31 139 8 178 32 8 28 68 12 122 26 160 4 6 16 26 432 12:30 PM 27 183 13 223 36 5 33 74 12 140 24 176 9 3 9 21 494 12:45 PM 23 172 8 203 41 6 28 75 6 120 29 155 6 8 14 28 461 Total 99 651 42 792 138 25 122 285 38 518 117 673 29 26 51 106 1856 Grand Total 200 1236 81 1517 334 61 239 634 87 989 232 1308 47 58 114 219 3678 Apprch %13.2 81.5 5.3 52.7 9.6 37.7 6.7 75.6 17.7 21.5 26.5 52.1 Total %5.4 33.6 2.2 41.2 9.1 1.7 6.5 17.2 2.4 26.9 6.3 35.6 1.3 1.6 3.1 6 Carlsbad Boulevard Southbound Tamrack Avenue Westbound Carlsbad Boulevard Northbound Beach Parking Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 32 170 13 215 50 11 32 93 10 120 31 161 3 12 10 25 494 12:00 PM 18 157 13 188 29 6 33 68 8 136 38 182 10 9 12 31 469 12:15 PM 31 139 8 178 32 8 28 68 12 122 26 160 4 6 16 26 432 12:30 PM 27 183 13 223 36 5 33 74 12 140 24 176 9 3 9 21 494 Total Volume 108 649 47 804 147 30 126 303 42 518 119 679 26 30 47 103 1889 % App. Total 13.4 80.7 5.8 48.5 9.9 41.6 6.2 76.3 17.5 25.2 29.1 45.6 PHF .844 .887 .904 .901 .735 .682 .955 .815 .875 .925 .783 .933 .650 .625 .734 .831 .956 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 143 of 356 File Name : CAR_Carl_Tam 6-25 Site Code : 99922433 Start Date : 6/25/2022 Page No : 2 City of Carlsbad N/S: Carlsbad Boulevard E/W: Tamrack Avenue Weather: Clear Carlsbad Boulevard B e a c h P a r k i n g T a m r a c k A v e n u e Carlsbad Boulevard Right 47 Thru 649 Left 108 InOut Total 670 804 1474 Ri g h t 12 6 Th r u 30 Le f t 14 7 Ou t To t a l In 25 7 30 3 56 0 Left 42 Thru 518 Right 119 Out TotalIn 843 679 1522 Le f t 26 Th r u 30 Rig h t 47 To t a l Ou t In 11 9 10 3 22 2 Peak Hour Begins at 11:45 AM Total Volume Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at: 11:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:45 AM 11:15 AM +0 mins.32 170 13 215 49 7 24 80 10 120 31 161 8 7 23 38 +15 mins.18 157 13 188 52 12 29 93 8 136 38 182 3 6 21 30 +30 mins.31 139 8 178 45 6 32 83 12 122 26 160 3 12 10 25 +45 mins.27 183 13 223 50 11 32 93 12 140 24 176 10 9 12 31 Total Volume 108 649 47 804 196 36 117 349 42 518 119 679 24 34 66 124 % App. Total 13.4 80.7 5.8 56.2 10.3 33.5 6.2 76.3 17.5 19.4 27.4 53.2 PHF .844 .887 .904 .901 .942 .750 .914 .938 .875 .925 .783 .933 .600 .708 .717 .816 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 (951)268-6268 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 144 of 356 Location:  N/S:  E/W: Date: 6/25/2022 Day: Saturday North Leg East Leg South Leg West Leg Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Beach Parking Driveway Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians Pedestrians 38 15 0 15 68 45 18 1 12 76 58 22 0 5 85 35 16 0 1 52 38 14 0 11 63 52 18 1 14 85 56 17 0 2 75 45 14 0 4 63 367 134 2 64 567 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue PEDESTRIANS Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 145 of 356 Location:  N/S:  E/W: Date: 6/25/2022 Day: Saturday Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 53544022393212 99 33136030300000 76 12601150292000 65 43406230216100 77 130210000344000 81 12709320221000 65 21803121293010 60 2200402091122 43 19 221 9 43 7 19 3 213 20 4 4 4 566 Carlsbad Boulevard Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Beach Parking Driveway Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 12:30 PM 12:45 PM TOTAL VOLUMES: 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 12:00 PM 12:15 PM Tamrack Avenue Carlsbad Boulevard Carlsbad BICYCLES Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 951‐268‐6268July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 146 of 356 Page 1 City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard B/ Sequoia Avenue - Bridge 24 Hour Directional Volume Count CARCASE Site Code: 999-22433 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 Phone: (951) 268-6268 email: counts@countsunlimited.com Start 6/30/2022 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 10 170 12 228 12:15 6 202 16 222 12:30 14 162 6 219 12:45 5 176 35 710 7 216 41 885 76 1595 01:00 6 195 7 219 01:15 5 180 6 225 01:30 2 198 2 217 01:45 3 183 16 756 2 159 17 820 33 1576 02:00 2 205 5 193 02:15 1 189 1 172 02:30 7 233 2 186 02:45 1 251 11 878 2 160 10 711 21 1589 03:00 1 226 1 192 03:15 1 273 0 187 03:30 0 239 8 216 03:45 3 276 5 1014 5 196 14 791 19 1805 04:00 1 270 4 202 04:15 6 264 4 161 04:30 3 291 9 168 04:45 2 269 12 1094 8 193 25 724 37 1818 05:00 4 272 15 183 05:15 6 301 23 173 05:30 13 304 33 200 05:45 15 286 38 1163 62 158 133 714 171 1877 06:00 22 235 69 158 06:15 27 175 76 196 06:30 37 215 90 171 06:45 36 186 122 811 120 152 355 677 477 1488 07:00 51 197 95 156 07:15 37 169 102 148 07:30 56 173 143 138 07:45 67 173 211 712 121 148 461 590 672 1302 08:00 69 156 137 151 08:15 86 156 155 119 08:30 99 102 146 102 08:45 91 100 345 514 146 82 584 454 929 968 09:00 95 75 120 80 09:15 86 58 125 73 09:30 122 79 137 75 09:45 103 64 406 276 142 64 524 292 930 568 10:00 106 93 139 82 10:15 137 102 132 79 10:30 148 82 155 55 10:45 147 62 538 339 151 39 577 255 1115 594 11:00 154 54 181 31 11:15 163 42 176 15 11:30 166 25 178 14 11:45 152 17 635 138 261 19 796 79 1431 217 Total 2374 8405 2374 8405 3537 6992 3537 6992 5911 15397 Combined Total 10779 10779 10529 10529 21308 AM Peak - 11:00 --- 11:00 ----- Vol.- 635 --- 796 ----- P.H.F. 0.956 0.762 PM Peak -- 05:00 --- 12:00 ---- Vol.-- 1163 --- 885 ---- P.H.F. 0.956 0.970 Percentag e 22.0% 78.0% 33.6% 66.4% ADT/AADT ADT 21,308 AADT 21,308 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 147 of 356 Page 1 City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard B/ Sequoia Avenue - Bridge 24 Hour Directional Volume Count CARCASE_Sat Site Code: 999-22433 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 Phone: (951) 268-6268 email: counts@countsunlimited.com Start 6/18/2022 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 26 211 25 184 12:15 18 231 28 198 12:30 19 237 13 228 12:45 13 240 76 919 13 203 79 813 155 1732 01:00 8 236 6 222 01:15 9 207 7 221 01:30 7 222 6 260 01:45 7 246 31 911 8 227 27 930 58 1841 02:00 9 205 5 241 02:15 8 229 8 234 02:30 7 202 5 184 02:45 8 229 32 865 7 229 25 888 57 1753 03:00 6 236 4 214 03:15 4 215 2 221 03:30 8 205 4 240 03:45 8 208 26 864 4 217 14 892 40 1756 04:00 5 203 3 243 04:15 3 198 5 178 04:30 3 181 6 232 04:45 4 202 15 784 8 205 22 858 37 1642 05:00 2 174 11 191 05:15 4 187 20 165 05:30 8 210 32 222 05:45 13 180 27 751 26 182 89 760 116 1511 06:00 16 185 29 160 06:15 20 178 35 161 06:30 29 157 64 169 06:45 33 158 98 678 48 145 176 635 274 1313 07:00 44 171 62 145 07:15 57 155 63 141 07:30 52 146 83 135 07:45 45 139 198 611 68 140 276 561 474 1172 08:00 52 143 84 138 08:15 62 140 94 131 08:30 105 131 89 124 08:45 85 119 304 533 113 108 380 501 684 1034 09:00 99 90 112 100 09:15 121 85 130 91 09:30 97 75 153 82 09:45 130 64 447 314 137 74 532 347 979 661 10:00 109 57 170 75 10:15 128 42 195 68 10:30 150 49 172 63 10:45 133 38 520 186 214 50 751 256 1271 442 11:00 178 35 222 46 11:15 194 29 169 35 11:30 214 25 185 27 11:45 248 23 834 112 225 20 801 128 1635 240 Total 2608 7528 2608 7528 3172 7569 3172 7569 5780 15097 Combined Total 10136 10136 10741 10741 20877 AM Peak - 11:00 --- 10:15 ----- Vol.- 834 --- 803 ----- P.H.F. 0.841 0.904 PM Peak -- 00:15 --- 01:30 ---- Vol.-- 944 --- 962 ---- P.H.F. 0.983 0.925 Percentag e 25.7% 74.3% 29.5% 70.5% ADT/AADT ADT 20,877 AADT 20,877 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 148 of 356 Page 1 City of Carlsbad Carlsbad Boulevard B/ Sequoia Avenue - Bridge 24 Hour Directional Volume Count CARCASE_SAT2 Site Code: 999-22433 Counts Unlimited, Inc. PO Box 1178 Corona, CA 92878 Phone: (951) 268-6268 email: counts@countsunlimited.com Start 6/25/2022 Northbound Hour Totals Southbound Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Sat Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 26 202 25 184 12:15 17 162 27 171 12:30 22 182 10 204 12:45 13 154 78 700 14 201 76 760 154 1460 01:00 12 159 7 181 01:15 10 174 6 198 01:30 11 205 16 196 01:45 7 167 40 705 8 194 37 769 77 1474 02:00 6 169 9 256 02:15 8 201 7 216 02:30 5 194 3 187 02:45 8 210 27 774 6 218 25 877 52 1651 03:00 2 213 5 204 03:15 4 187 2 197 03:30 4 183 3 193 03:45 7 182 17 765 4 192 14 786 31 1551 04:00 2 215 4 184 04:15 3 161 5 189 04:30 5 240 11 199 04:45 4 253 14 869 9 206 29 778 43 1647 05:00 8 300 21 188 05:15 4 290 20 186 05:30 7 311 27 209 05:45 12 332 31 1233 30 181 98 764 129 1997 06:00 13 296 29 159 06:15 26 295 35 171 06:30 26 251 56 144 06:45 34 165 99 1007 66 146 186 620 285 1627 07:00 41 209 67 142 07:15 50 172 81 117 07:30 58 151 77 120 07:45 55 176 204 708 79 113 304 492 508 1200 08:00 85 145 98 136 08:15 101 137 88 132 08:30 107 127 117 112 08:45 111 61 404 470 121 106 424 486 828 956 09:00 115 57 126 91 09:15 117 67 129 81 09:30 125 75 143 82 09:45 137 64 494 263 152 71 550 325 1044 588 10:00 148 55 149 72 10:15 150 39 157 58 10:30 170 51 187 60 10:45 161 41 629 186 157 56 650 246 1279 432 11:00 146 33 187 43 11:15 171 26 196 30 11:30 167 25 202 24 11:45 147 33 631 117 230 28 815 125 1446 242 Total 2668 7797 2668 7797 3208 7028 3208 7028 5876 14825 Combined Total 10465 10465 10236 10236 20701 AM Peak - 10:30 --- 11:00 ----- Vol.- 648 --- 815 ----- P.H.F. 0.947 0.886 PM Peak -- 05:30 --- 02:00 ---- Vol.-- 1234 --- 877 ---- P.H.F. 0.929 0.856 Percentag e 25.5% 74.5% 31.3% 68.7% ADT/AADT ADT 20,701 AADT 20,701 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 149 of 356 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: N-S STREET:DATE:LOCATION: E-W STREET:DAY:PROJECT# NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 0 59 1 1 161 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 225 7:15 AM 0 46 2 1 175 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 229 7:30 AM 0 77 1 0 228 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 307 7:45 AM 0 69 1 0 225 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 299 8:00 AM 0 89 2 0 164 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 259 8:15 AM 0 77 1 1 173 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 254 8:30 AM 0 82 0 2 155 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 241 8:45 AM 0 98 5 3 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 235 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL Volumes 0 597 13 8 1410 0 0 0 0 16 0 5 2049 Approach %0.00 97.87 2.13 0.56 99.44 0.00 ############76.19 0.00 23.81 App/Depart 610 /602 1418 /1426 0 /21 21 /0 730 AM PEAK Volumes 0 312 5 1 790 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 1119 Approach %0.00 98.42 1.58 0.13 99.87 0.00 ############90.91 0.00 9.09 PEAK HR. FACTOR:0.911 33.146855, -117.344816 08/27/19 CarlsbadCarlsbad Blvd. Sequoia Ave.19-1419-002TUESDAY 0.867 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 0.688 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.0000.871 1-Way Stop (WB) COMMENT 1: GPS: CONTROL: veracity grouptraffic July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 150 of 356 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: N-S STREET:DATE:LOCATION: E-W STREET:DAY:PROJECT# NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES:0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6:00 AM 6:15 AM 6:30 AM 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 0 49 1 1 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 174 7:15 AM 0 42 2 1 114 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 163 7:30 AM 0 73 1 2 163 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 242 7:45 AM 0 67 0 0 184 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 254 8:00 AM 0 88 1 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 217 8:15 AM 0 83 0 3 133 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 220 8:30 AM 0 93 0 3 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 225 8:45 AM 0 87 3 1 99 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 197 9:00 AM 9:15 AM 9:30 AM 9:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL Volumes 0 582 8 11 1067 0 0 0 0 9 0 15 1692 Approach %0.00 98.64 1.36 1.02 98.98 0.00 ############37.50 0.00 62.50 App/Depart 590 /597 1078 /1076 0 /19 24 /0 730 AM PEAK Volumes 0 311 2 5 606 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 933 Approach %0.00 99.36 0.64 0.82 99.18 0.00 ############44.44 0.00 55.56 PEAK HR. FACTOR:0.918 33.148205, -117.345909 08/27/19 CarlsbadCarlsbad Blvd. Redwood Ave.19-1419-003TUESDAY 0.830 AM Peak Hr Begins at: 0.750 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.0000.879 1-Way Stop (WB) COMMENT 1: GPS: CONTROL: veracity grouptraffic July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 151 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project Mobility Analysis Attachment C: Cumulative Projects List, Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 152 of 356 3060 STATE STREET RESTAURANT - 3060 STATE STREET 1,358 sf restaurant & outdoor patio converted from existing vacant commercial building. In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 1.358 1,000 Sq. Ft. GFA1 191 7 8 15 9 6 15 132 24 20 44 191 7 8 15 9 6 15 132 24 20 44 CARLSBAD BY THE SEA SUMMERHOUSE - 2710 OCEAN STREET Carlsbad by the Sea Summerhouse: Consolodation of 5 parcels for new 40,000 sq ft professional services building for memory care and independent living. In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 56 beds /40,000 sf beds /1,000 Sq. Ft. GFA1 168 7 5 12 5 7 12 168 6 13 19 168 7 5 12 5 7 12 168 6 13 19 CHINQUAPIN COASTAL HOMES - 330 CHINQUAPIN AVENUE Chinquapin Coast Homes: Three Triplex buildings containing nine airspace condominium units. In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 9 DU1 72 1 5 6 5 2 7 79 2 3 7 72 1 5 6 5 2 7 79 2 3 7 GARFIELD BEACH HOMES - 3570 GARFIELD STREET Construction of 12 single family dwelling units. In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 12 DU1 120 3 7 10 8 4 12 123 11 9 20 120 3 7 10 8 4 12 123 11 9 20 VIGILUCCI'S SEAFOOD & STEAKHOUSE - 3878 CARLSBAD BOULEVARD Addition of a 1,925 sf to the patio area to accommodate 104 seats for dining use. In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total 1.925 sf /104 seats Seats /1,000 Sq. Ft. GFA1 193 1 1 2 11 5 16 267 20 14 34 193 1 1 2 11 5 16 267 20 14 34 Land Use Category Quality Restaurant Quantity Units Total Project Trips Notes: 1 GFA = Gross Floor Area 2 Trip rates are calculated based on SANDAG's Brief Guid of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002). Equivalent number of beds was calculated using ITE trip rates for 1,000 sf of Assisted Living. 3 Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) average rates. Quantity Units Weekday2 SANDAG - Condominium (or any multi-family 6-20 DU/acre) Summer Saturday3 ITE 215 Single-Family Attached Housing Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Midday Peak Hour Midday Peak Hour Weekday2 SANDAG - Convalescent/Nursing (56 Beds) Notes: 1 GFA = Gross Floor Area 2 Trip rates are calculated based on SANDAG's Brief Guid of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) 3 Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) average rates. Quantity Units Weekday2 SANDAG - Sit-Down, High Turnover Restaurant (less 12% pass-by trips) Daily Total Project Trips PM Peak HourDailyAM Peak Hour Midday Peak Hour Summer Saturday3 ITE 930 Fast Casual Restaurant Restaurant Land Use Category Summer Saturday3 ITE 245 Assisted Living (40,000 square feet) Single-Family Detached Housing Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Land Use Category Condominium Notes: 1 DU = Dwelling Units 2 Trip rates are calculated based on SANDAG's Brief Guid of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) 3 Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) average rates . Quantity Units Weekday2 SANDAG - Single-Family Detached (Average 3-6 DU/acre) Summer Saturday3 ITE 210 Single-Family Detached Housing Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Midday Peak Hour Land Use Category Assisted Living Total Project Trips Notes: 1 GFA = Gross Floor Area 2 Trip rates are calculated based on SANDAG's Brief Guid of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) 3 Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) average rates . Total Project Trips Notes: 1 DU = Dwelling Units 2 Trip rates are calculated based on SANDAG's Brief Guid of Vehicular Trip Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (April 2002) 3 Trip rates are calculated based on ITE Trip Generation (11th Edition) fitted curve equations. Quantity Units Weekday2 SANDAG - Quality Restaurant (1.925 square feet) Summer Saturday3 ITE 931 Fine Dining Restaurant (104 Seats) Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Land Use Category Midday Peak Hour Total Project Trips Cumulative_Project_Volumes.xlsxJuly 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 153 of 356 3060 STATE STREET RESTAURANT INBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 20% OUTBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 20% CARLSBAD BY THE SEA SUMMERHOUSE INBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 50%20% OUTBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 20%50% CHINQUAPIN COASTAL HOMES INBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 20%80% OUTBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 50%50% GARFIELD BEACH HOMES INBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 40%20% OUTBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 60% VIGILUCCI'S SEAFOOD & STEAKHOUSE INBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 40%40% OUTBOUND INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 40%40% July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 154 of 356 3060 STATE STREET RESTAURANT AM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Summer Saturday INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CARLSBAD BY THE SEA SUMMERHOUSE AM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 4 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 3 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Summer Saturday INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 3 0 3 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 CHINQUAPIN COASTAL HOMES AM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 PM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Summer Saturday INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 GARFIELD BEACH HOMES AM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Summer Saturday INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 4 2 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VIGILUCCI'S SEAFOOD & STEAKHOUSE AM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PM INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 4 4 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 Summer Saturday INTID NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR WBL WBT WBR EBL EBT EBR 1 0 0 8 8 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 155 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project Mobility Analysis Attachment D: SANDAG RTDM ABM2+/2021 Forecasts for 2016 and 2035 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 156 of 356 Fi n a l Ca r l s b a d B o u l e v a r d a n d T a m a r a c k A v e n u e Pe d e s t r i a n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t Mo b i l i t y A n a l y s i s AB M 2 +/20 2 1 Fo r e c a s t s f o r 2 0 1 6 Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 15 7 of 35 6 Fi n a l Ca r l s b a d B o u l e v a r d a n d T a m a r a c k A v e n u e Pe d e s t r i a n I m p r o v e m e n t P r o j e c t Mo b i l i t y A n a l y s i s AB M 2 +/20 2 1 Fo r e c a s t s f o r 20 3 5 Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 15 8 of 35 6 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project Mobility Analysis Attachment E: SimTraffic and Sidra Reports July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 159 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing AM Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 01 Exist AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 4.3 3.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)32.6 37.6 1.2 14.4 12.3 4.9 33.4 14.8 7.0 29.3 13.6 1.4 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.5 0.4 39.4 3.8 12.0 0.7 11.2 3.7 2.4 22.8 0.8 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.1 0.0 2.6 0.2 0.6 0.2 1.3 0.3 0.5 2.3 0.0 Avg Speed (mph)5 5 19 17 19 21 5 9 12 5 10 19 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)15.3 15.5 30.7 29.2 30.9 35.6 17.3 25.2 38.4 18.3 25.0 50.7 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 11 1 3 0 2 0 0 6 0 CO Emissions (g)2 3 2 329 24 78 4 76 10 17 162 2 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 0 34 2 9 0 8 1 1 19 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)13.9 Travel Dist (mi)98.1 Travel Time (hr)8.1 Avg Speed (mph)12 Fuel Used (gal)3.5 Fuel Eff. (mpg)27.9 HC Emissions (g)24 CO Emissions (g)710 NOx Emissions (g)75 Density (ft/veh)535 Occupancy (veh)8 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)6.1 3.4 1.3 1.3 4.0 1.5 1.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.4 15.8 0.1 2.0 240.2 258.7 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 8.3 9.1 Avg Speed (mph)16 17 22 17 27 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 6.8 7.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)38.5 36.3 15.9 19.2 37.3 35.4 32.9 HC Emissions (g)0 0 13 0 0 63 76 CO Emissions (g)1 1 535 2 6 1140 1684 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 47 0 1 173 222 Density (ft/veh)1005 Occupancy (veh)0 0 1 0 0 8 9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 160 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing AM Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 01 Exist AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)9.2 3.4 1.2 1.7 1.3 1.4 Travel Dist (mi)1.1 0.1 190.6 3.9 0.0 37.4 233.1 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.0 6.5 0.1 0.0 1.7 8.4 Avg Speed (mph)15 17 29 29 15 22 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 5.3 0.1 0.0 2.3 7.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)34.1 33.8 35.8 36.5 19.6 16.3 30.0 HC Emissions (g)0 0 47 1 0 29 77 CO Emissions (g)2 0 820 12 1 1150 1986 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 131 2 0 112 244 Density (ft/veh)977 Occupancy (veh)0 0 7 0 0 2 8 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)18.0 Travel Dist (mi)1200.6 Travel Time (hr)47.3 Avg Speed (mph)26 Fuel Used (gal)36.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)32.6 HC Emissions (g)342 CO Emissions (g)7436 NOx Emissions (g)993 Density (ft/veh)459 Occupancy (veh)47 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 161 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing AM Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 01 Exist AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft)46 10 137 110 45 96 107 73 135 136 15 Average Queue (ft)11 0 69 24 12 45 45 28 60 65 1 95th Queue (ft)36 5 124 65 37 83 89 61 110 113 15 Link Distance (ft)288 916 221 221 227 227 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 75 70 115 70 Storage Blk Time (%)9 6 0 0 3 0 1 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB Directions Served LR L Maximum Queue (ft)31 6 Average Queue (ft)7 0 95th Queue (ft)28 6 Link Distance (ft)465 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB SB Directions Served LR L Maximum Queue (ft)35 6 Average Queue (ft)9 0 95th Queue (ft)31 4 Link Distance (ft)497 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 162 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 02 Exist PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.3 4.1 3.8 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)64.1 55.1 1.6 35.4 34.9 12.9 65.3 23.4 19.8 55.8 14.9 1.7 Travel Dist (mi)0.8 0.9 1.4 19.1 2.6 15.0 1.8 51.7 15.2 5.3 24.8 0.6 Travel Time (hr)0.3 0.3 0.1 1.9 0.2 0.9 0.7 8.1 2.3 1.8 2.7 0.0 Avg Speed (mph)3 3 18 11 11 17 3 6 7 3 9 19 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.5 0.2 3.1 0.8 0.5 1.1 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)9.7 10.4 23.8 22.7 24.8 31.2 9.2 16.5 19.7 11.0 23.0 52.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 6 0 6 0 19 5 1 7 0 CO Emissions (g)9 10 15 195 15 137 17 525 127 53 191 2 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 1 18 1 16 1 69 14 4 22 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 8 2 2 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)23.7 Travel Dist (mi)139.3 Travel Time (hr)19.3 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)7.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg)19.0 HC Emissions (g)46 CO Emissions (g)1294 NOx Emissions (g)150 Density (ft/veh)219 Occupancy (veh)19 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)22.0 9.4 1.9 2.3 10.5 1.7 2.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.8 60.5 0.6 3.8 282.6 348.6 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.7 0.0 0.2 9.8 12.8 Avg Speed (mph)9 13 23 17 25 29 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.1 8.0 11.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)24.8 30.1 16.4 20.0 35.0 35.3 29.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 45 0 0 76 122 CO Emissions (g)1 3 1553 8 10 1401 2977 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 191 1 1 212 406 Density (ft/veh)718 Occupancy (veh)0 0 3 0 0 10 13 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 163 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 02 Exist PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)27.8 28.4 10.2 10.5 12.9 1.5 7.7 Travel Dist (mi)0.6 0.4 827.9 39.2 0.4 32.9 901.3 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.1 31.6 1.5 0.0 1.5 34.8 Avg Speed (mph)8 7 26 25 9 23 26 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 23.9 1.1 0.0 1.8 26.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)22.9 22.3 34.7 34.8 19.7 17.9 33.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 238 15 0 23 276 CO Emissions (g)2 1 4584 278 4 806 5676 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 671 42 0 88 801 Density (ft/veh)237 Occupancy (veh)0 0 32 2 0 1 35 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)33.8 Travel Dist (mi)2414.9 Travel Time (hr)104.3 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)77.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.4 HC Emissions (g)763 CO Emissions (g)16406 NOx Emissions (g)2226 Density (ft/veh)207 Occupancy (veh)104 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 164 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 02 Exist PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft)75 41 135 154 159 242 256 168 167 172 32 Average Queue (ft)29 2 60 39 42 212 221 75 80 79 1 95th Queue (ft)64 22 115 97 119 259 254 136 145 141 23 Link Distance (ft)288 916 221 221 227 227 Upstream Blk Time (%)10 15 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)63 100 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 75 70 115 70 Storage Blk Time (%) 35 0 7 2 3 38 4 2 12 Queuing Penalty (veh) 9 0 7 2 16 12 9 2 2 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB SB SB Directions Served LR TR L T Maximum Queue (ft)50 3 31 7 Average Queue (ft)12 0 4 0 95th Queue (ft)39 3 21 7 Link Distance (ft)465 227 2686 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB Directions Served LR T TR L Maximum Queue (ft)43 268 314 37 Average Queue (ft)10 81 120 6 95th Queue (ft)34 214 267 26 Link Distance (ft)497 3442 3442 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 223 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 165 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing SAT Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 03 Exist SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.0 3.6 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)47.2 45.3 1.6 24.9 25.9 13.2 52.6 26.9 22.2 45.9 20.3 2.6 Travel Dist (mi)0.9 1.2 2.1 27.8 4.1 21.5 2.1 35.4 7.4 5.6 33.4 2.0 Travel Time (hr)0.3 0.3 0.2 2.3 0.3 1.3 0.7 6.2 1.2 1.6 4.6 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)4 4 18 13 14 17 3 6 6 4 7 17 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.1 0.7 0.2 2.1 0.4 0.5 1.7 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)11.8 11.9 24.2 25.6 27.6 31.5 11.1 16.6 19.9 12.4 19.9 40.6 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 7 1 5 0 11 2 2 10 0 CO Emissions (g)9 14 20 242 27 151 17 326 48 59 276 9 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 2 22 2 15 2 37 5 5 32 1 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 6 1 2 5 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)24.4 Travel Dist (mi)143.5 Travel Time (hr)19.0 Avg Speed (mph)8 Fuel Used (gal)7.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)20.3 HC Emissions (g)39 CO Emissions (g)1198 NOx Emissions (g)126 Density (ft/veh)225 Occupancy (veh)19 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)13.6 5.8 1.9 1.8 7.6 2.3 2.1 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.9 45.1 0.3 4.9 379.2 430.6 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.1 0.0 0.2 13.3 15.6 Avg Speed (mph)11 15 22 17 26 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.1 10.7 13.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)28.6 35.8 15.6 20.5 35.5 35.4 31.2 HC Emissions (g)0 0 34 0 1 101 136 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1272 4 14 1880 3173 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 144 0 2 280 427 Density (ft/veh)587 Occupancy (veh)0 0 2 0 0 13 16 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 166 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing SAT Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 03 Exist SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)16.9 10.3 4.1 4.1 7.9 1.9 3.2 Travel Dist (mi)0.8 0.5 543.1 16.1 0.3 45.4 606.2 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.0 19.3 0.6 0.0 2.1 22.1 Avg Speed (mph)11 13 28 28 12 22 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 15.3 0.5 0.0 2.8 18.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)28.0 32.0 35.5 35.7 18.9 16.5 32.7 HC Emissions (g)0 0 146 8 0 32 186 CO Emissions (g)3 1 2703 135 4 1160 4005 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 405 21 0 134 561 Density (ft/veh)372 Occupancy (veh)0 0 19 1 0 2 22 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)31.2 Travel Dist (mi)2194.6 Travel Time (hr)93.7 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)69.5 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.6 HC Emissions (g)653 CO Emissions (g)14140 NOx Emissions (g)1901 Density (ft/veh)231 Occupancy (veh)93 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 167 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing SAT Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 03 Exist SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft)80 36 149 169 159 233 243 165 217 222 159 Average Queue (ft)31 4 66 53 40 168 183 71 119 123 15 95th Queue (ft)69 24 124 123 109 246 255 132 191 194 90 Link Distance (ft)288 916 221 221 227 227 Upstream Blk Time (%)2 4 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)8 17 1 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 75 70 115 70 Storage Blk Time (%) 33 0 9 3 3 37 3 8 26 Queuing Penalty (veh) 14 0 13 5 10 15 9 8 10 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB SB SB Directions Served LR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)33 33 12 18 Average Queue (ft)11 4 0 1 95th Queue (ft)35 20 6 11 Link Distance (ft)465 2686 2686 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB Directions Served LR T TR L Maximum Queue (ft)37 86 122 30 Average Queue (ft)10 9 17 3 95th Queue (ft)33 45 70 18 Link Distance (ft)497 3442 3442 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 110 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 168 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative AM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 04 Cuml AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.1 3.7 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)35.8 33.6 1.1 15.0 14.0 5.1 33.2 15.0 6.0 29.3 13.1 1.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.2 0.4 0.3 38.6 4.4 13.1 0.5 11.6 3.8 2.6 23.1 0.8 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.1 0.0 2.5 0.3 0.6 0.1 1.3 0.3 0.5 2.3 0.0 Avg Speed (mph)5 5 20 17 18 21 5 9 12 5 10 19 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)16.8 16.2 31.7 29.0 31.0 35.4 18.0 25.1 39.7 18.3 25.2 49.2 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 13 1 4 0 3 0 0 6 0 CO Emissions (g)2 2 1 350 23 103 2 83 10 15 162 3 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 0 37 2 13 0 9 1 1 19 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)13.7 Travel Dist (mi)99.5 Travel Time (hr)8.2 Avg Speed (mph)13 Fuel Used (gal)3.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)28.0 HC Emissions (g)28 CO Emissions (g)757 NOx Emissions (g)83 Density (ft/veh)531 Occupancy (veh)8 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)8.5 3.3 1.4 1.7 5.1 1.4 1.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.4 16.4 0.2 2.9 243.5 263.6 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 8.4 9.3 Avg Speed (mph)15 17 22 17 27 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 6.9 8.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)33.9 37.6 15.7 18.2 36.7 35.2 32.7 HC Emissions (g)0 0 15 0 0 68 84 CO Emissions (g)1 1 591 4 9 1216 1821 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 54 0 1 188 244 Density (ft/veh)983 Occupancy (veh)0 0 1 0 0 8 9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 169 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative AM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 04 Cuml AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)8.5 4.3 1.2 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 Travel Dist (mi)0.8 0.1 192.9 3.4 0.0 37.4 234.6 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.0 6.6 0.1 0.0 1.7 8.5 Avg Speed (mph)15 17 29 29 18 22 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 5.4 0.1 0.0 2.3 7.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)35.0 38.8 35.5 35.3 21.7 16.4 29.9 HC Emissions (g)0 0 54 0 0 32 86 CO Emissions (g)2 0 936 10 0 1177 2125 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 149 1 0 118 269 Density (ft/veh)972 Occupancy (veh)0 0 7 0 0 2 8 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)17.9 Travel Dist (mi)1213.7 Travel Time (hr)47.8 Avg Speed (mph)26 Fuel Used (gal)37.4 Fuel Eff. (mpg)32.5 HC Emissions (g)372 CO Emissions (g)7920 NOx Emissions (g)1076 Density (ft/veh)454 Occupancy (veh)48 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 170 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative AM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 04 Cuml AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT L TR L T TR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)41 144 140 37 100 119 67 130 137 Average Queue (ft)10 69 27 9 43 49 30 59 65 95th Queue (ft)33 124 80 30 81 93 59 109 115 Link Distance (ft)288 916 221 221 227 227 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)75 70 115 Storage Blk Time (%)8 6 0 3 1 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 6 1 0 0 1 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB Directions Served LR L Maximum Queue (ft)33 31 Average Queue (ft)8 2 95th Queue (ft)30 13 Link Distance (ft)465 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB SB Directions Served LR L Maximum Queue (ft)31 3 Average Queue (ft)8 0 95th Queue (ft)29 3 Link Distance (ft)497 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 171 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative PM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 05 Cuml PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.0 3.8 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)60.2 62.0 1.6 36.6 41.9 14.6 70.3 24.4 20.9 55.8 15.0 1.7 Travel Dist (mi)0.8 0.8 1.3 20.4 2.2 15.7 1.7 52.8 15.6 5.9 24.8 0.8 Travel Time (hr)0.3 0.3 0.1 2.1 0.2 1.0 0.7 8.5 2.5 1.9 2.7 0.0 Avg Speed (mph)3 3 18 11 10 16 2 6 6 3 9 19 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.2 3.3 0.8 0.5 1.1 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)10.3 9.8 23.2 22.5 23.3 30.5 8.6 16.1 19.0 10.8 22.9 49.7 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 8 0 6 0 22 5 2 7 0 CO Emissions (g)8 8 14 221 13 145 16 567 125 64 189 2 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 1 21 1 16 1 73 14 5 22 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 9 2 2 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)24.6 Travel Dist (mi)142.6 Travel Time (hr)20.3 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)7.7 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.6 HC Emissions (g)50 CO Emissions (g)1371 NOx Emissions (g)157 Density (ft/veh)209 Occupancy (veh)20 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)22.2 10.1 1.9 2.4 13.9 1.8 2.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.6 61.6 0.7 3.9 289.4 356.6 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.2 10.1 13.1 Avg Speed (mph)9 13 22 17 24 29 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.1 8.2 12.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)25.2 32.6 16.2 18.8 34.4 35.2 29.3 HC Emissions (g)0 0 51 0 0 81 132 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1682 11 11 1462 3168 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 206 1 2 223 432 Density (ft/veh)699 Occupancy (veh)0 0 3 0 0 10 13 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 172 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative PM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 05 Cuml PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)26.0 40.0 11.1 10.2 17.6 1.4 8.4 Travel Dist (mi)0.6 0.4 851.8 36.6 0.3 33.2 922.9 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.1 32.8 1.4 0.0 1.5 35.9 Avg Speed (mph)8 6 26 25 7 23 26 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 24.7 1.0 0.0 1.9 27.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)23.7 19.1 34.5 35.0 17.1 17.8 33.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 250 10 0 23 283 CO Emissions (g)2 2 4814 195 4 818 5834 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 702 28 0 89 820 Density (ft/veh)230 Occupancy (veh)0 0 33 1 0 1 36 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)35.1 Travel Dist (mi)2467.9 Travel Time (hr)107.5 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)79.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.2 HC Emissions (g)797 CO Emissions (g)17054 NOx Emissions (g)2307 Density (ft/veh)201 Occupancy (veh)107 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 173 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative PM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 05 Cuml PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft)83 35 144 150 159 246 251 159 170 159 31 Average Queue (ft)26 2 64 43 44 216 224 80 80 79 1 95th Queue (ft)61 24 118 103 122 256 253 137 142 138 23 Link Distance (ft)288 916 221 221 227 227 Upstream Blk Time (%)12 17 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)78 115 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 75 70 115 70 Storage Blk Time (%) 28 0 9 2 6 40 6 2 13 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 9 3 27 13 13 2 2 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR L Maximum Queue (ft)39 7 33 Average Queue (ft)11 0 5 95th Queue (ft)36 5 24 Link Distance (ft)465 227 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB Directions Served LR T TR L Maximum Queue (ft)37 257 310 30 Average Queue (ft)10 94 138 5 95th Queue (ft)33 232 281 23 Link Distance (ft)497 3442 3442 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 269 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 174 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative SAT Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 06 Cuml SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.3 4.1 3.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)48.6 51.1 1.8 27.7 26.9 12.3 54.8 27.6 23.3 47.3 20.2 2.7 Travel Dist (mi)1.1 1.5 2.1 28.8 4.1 21.9 2.0 36.9 8.1 6.4 36.3 1.8 Travel Time (hr)0.3 0.4 0.2 2.5 0.3 1.3 0.7 6.6 1.4 1.8 4.9 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)4 3 18 12 13 17 3 6 6 4 7 17 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.2 0.2 0.7 0.2 2.3 0.4 0.5 1.8 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)11.5 11.1 23.4 25.0 26.7 31.7 10.7 16.1 19.2 12.1 19.7 39.1 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 9 1 6 0 13 2 2 11 0 CO Emissions (g)12 17 23 272 29 175 17 359 60 66 294 8 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 2 26 2 19 2 42 6 6 35 1 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 7 1 2 5 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)25.1 Travel Dist (mi)150.9 Travel Time (hr)20.5 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)7.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)19.8 HC Emissions (g)44 CO Emissions (g)1331 NOx Emissions (g)142 Density (ft/veh)208 Occupancy (veh)20 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)17.5 6.5 1.9 2.4 10.5 2.5 2.3 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.9 47.0 0.3 4.6 411.8 465.0 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.1 0.0 0.2 14.5 16.9 Avg Speed (mph)10 15 22 17 25 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.1 11.6 14.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)27.9 33.9 15.6 19.1 35.4 35.4 31.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 38 0 1 109 147 CO Emissions (g)1 3 1360 6 13 2029 3411 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 154 1 2 300 457 Density (ft/veh)541 Occupancy (veh)0 0 2 0 0 14 17 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 175 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative SAT Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 06 Cuml SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)18.5 11.3 4.8 4.0 8.7 1.9 3.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.7 0.5 566.7 16.9 0.3 48.9 633.9 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.0 20.3 0.6 0.0 2.3 23.3 Avg Speed (mph)10 12 28 27 11 22 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 16.0 0.5 0.0 2.9 19.4 Fuel Eff. (mpg)27.3 31.0 35.5 35.4 18.7 16.7 32.6 HC Emissions (g)0 0 157 7 0 32 196 CO Emissions (g)2 1 2893 119 3 1168 4185 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 434 18 0 138 590 Density (ft/veh)354 Occupancy (veh)0 0 20 1 0 2 23 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)32.4 Travel Dist (mi)2322.0 Travel Time (hr)100.0 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)73.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.5 HC Emissions (g)692 CO Emissions (g)14981 NOx Emissions (g)2008 Density (ft/veh)217 Occupancy (veh)100 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 176 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative SAT Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 06 Cuml SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft)99 57 155 207 160 243 246 170 210 240 142 Average Queue (ft)37 4 74 55 45 175 190 80 127 135 14 95th Queue (ft)78 29 133 138 120 254 261 143 196 215 89 Link Distance (ft)288 916 221 221 227 227 Upstream Blk Time (%)3 6 0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)15 25 0 2 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 75 70 115 70 Storage Blk Time (%) 35 0 10 3 3 39 4 9 28 Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 0 15 5 9 16 13 11 11 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LR T L T T Maximum Queue (ft)37 6 33 17 28 Average Queue (ft)12 0 5 1 1 95th Queue (ft)36 0 24 11 12 Link Distance (ft)465 227 2686 2686 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 Storage Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LR T TR L T Maximum Queue (ft)39 100 136 33 6 Average Queue (ft)11 15 27 4 0 95th Queue (ft)35 69 100 20 6 Link Distance (ft)497 3442 3442 221 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 138 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 177 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year AM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 07 HY AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 4.5 3.7 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)29.9 37.4 1.0 13.6 13.0 4.8 29.7 14.3 5.6 28.1 13.5 1.3 Travel Dist (mi)0.2 0.3 0.3 38.1 4.1 11.9 0.6 11.3 3.6 2.4 23.1 0.8 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.1 0.0 2.4 0.2 0.6 0.1 1.2 0.3 0.5 2.4 0.0 Avg Speed (mph)5 4 19 17 18 22 5 9 13 5 10 20 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)16.6 15.8 31.9 29.7 30.0 35.3 18.9 25.4 40.6 18.8 25.3 53.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 12 1 4 0 3 0 0 6 0 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1 321 25 93 3 94 11 17 162 2 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 0 34 2 11 0 10 1 1 20 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)13.3 Travel Dist (mi)96.8 Travel Time (hr)7.8 Avg Speed (mph)13 Fuel Used (gal)3.4 Fuel Eff. (mpg)28.3 HC Emissions (g)26 CO Emissions (g)731 NOx Emissions (g)79 Density (ft/veh)553 Occupancy (veh)8 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)7.1 3.1 1.3 1.6 4.1 1.4 1.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.5 15.8 0.1 2.9 241.2 260.9 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 8.3 9.2 Avg Speed (mph)15 18 22 17 27 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 6.8 7.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)35.3 39.5 15.7 18.2 34.7 35.5 32.9 HC Emissions (g)0 0 16 0 0 64 80 CO Emissions (g)1 1 577 2 8 1158 1747 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 54 0 1 178 234 Density (ft/veh)994 Occupancy (veh)0 0 1 0 0 8 9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 178 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year AM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 07 HY AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)9.1 3.5 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.4 Travel Dist (mi)0.8 0.2 188.7 3.6 0.0 37.1 230.4 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.0 6.5 0.1 0.0 1.7 8.3 Avg Speed (mph)15 17 29 29 16 22 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 5.3 0.1 0.0 2.3 7.7 Fuel Eff. (mpg)34.1 37.3 35.5 35.4 23.8 16.3 29.8 HC Emissions (g)0 0 54 0 0 29 84 CO Emissions (g)2 0 923 10 0 1136 2071 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 150 1 0 112 264 Density (ft/veh)987 Occupancy (veh)0 0 6 0 0 2 8 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)17.6 Travel Dist (mi)1194.3 Travel Time (hr)46.9 Avg Speed (mph)26 Fuel Used (gal)36.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)32.6 HC Emissions (g)362 CO Emissions (g)7693 NOx Emissions (g)1049 Density (ft/veh)462 Occupancy (veh)47 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 179 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year AM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 07 HY AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)42 4 140 149 36 102 107 78 123 125 Average Queue (ft)9 0 62 25 9 42 45 28 61 65 95th Queue (ft)31 4 113 76 31 80 88 61 108 111 Link Distance (ft)288 916 221 221 227 227 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 75 70 115 Storage Blk Time (%)8 5 0 0 2 0 1 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB Directions Served LR L Maximum Queue (ft)31 24 Average Queue (ft)8 1 95th Queue (ft)31 10 Link Distance (ft)465 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB SB Directions Served LR L Maximum Queue (ft)35 6 Average Queue (ft)8 0 95th Queue (ft)30 4 Link Distance (ft)497 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 8 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 180 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year PM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 08 HY PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.1 4.2 3.9 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)60.4 57.9 1.7 35.4 44.5 13.3 58.9 23.0 20.7 52.2 15.4 1.6 Travel Dist (mi)0.7 0.8 1.2 17.2 2.1 12.3 1.5 45.0 13.6 4.9 22.3 0.6 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.3 0.1 1.7 0.2 0.7 0.5 6.9 2.1 1.5 2.5 0.0 Avg Speed (mph)3 3 18 11 10 17 3 6 6 3 9 19 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.4 0.2 2.7 0.7 0.4 1.0 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)9.6 10.7 23.7 22.8 23.2 31.0 9.7 16.8 19.3 11.5 22.6 48.2 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 5 0 3 0 16 4 1 7 0 CO Emissions (g)8 8 12 160 15 89 13 432 103 50 170 2 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 1 15 1 9 1 55 11 4 20 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 8 2 2 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)23.6 Travel Dist (mi)122.2 Travel Time (hr)17.0 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)6.4 Fuel Eff. (mpg)19.1 HC Emissions (g)36 CO Emissions (g)1061 NOx Emissions (g)118 Density (ft/veh)229 Occupancy (veh)18 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)26.6 7.0 1.9 2.4 12.9 1.8 2.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.5 52.3 0.6 3.8 257.5 315.1 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.2 9.0 11.5 Avg Speed (mph)8 14 23 17 24 29 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.1 7.3 10.7 Fuel Eff. (mpg)23.8 33.9 16.5 18.3 34.8 35.2 29.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 39 0 0 70 109 CO Emissions (g)1 1 1350 11 12 1278 2653 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 163 1 1 193 359 Density (ft/veh)727 Occupancy (veh)0 0 3 0 0 10 13 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 181 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year PM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 08 HY PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)24.9 26.5 9.1 8.6 13.9 1.6 6.9 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.4 727.7 37.2 0.3 29.6 795.7 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 27.4 1.5 0.0 1.3 30.3 Avg Speed (mph)9 8 27 26 9 22 26 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 21.0 1.1 0.0 1.7 23.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)25.4 22.4 34.7 34.7 17.2 17.8 33.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 199 8 0 20 227 CO Emissions (g)1 2 3878 155 4 711 4751 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 567 22 0 79 669 Density (ft/veh)249 Occupancy (veh)0 0 30 2 0 1 33 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)32.7 Travel Dist (mi)2132.2 Travel Time (hr)91.7 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)68.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.4 HC Emissions (g)637 CO Emissions (g)13923 NOx Emissions (g)1874 Density (ft/veh)216 Occupancy (veh)100 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 182 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year PM Pk Hr - No Build 09/15/2022 08 HY PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft)91 58 138 115 140 240 250 163 178 176 31 Average Queue (ft)27 3 59 35 38 204 216 72 80 84 1 95th Queue (ft)69 27 117 85 112 266 264 131 148 150 24 Link Distance (ft)288 916 221 221 227 227 Upstream Blk Time (%)8 14 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)50 85 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 75 70 115 70 Storage Blk Time (%) 31 0 8 1 3 37 4 2 13 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 7 1 14 11 8 2 2 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR L Maximum Queue (ft)39 2 44 Average Queue (ft)10 0 5 95th Queue (ft)34 2 24 Link Distance (ft)465 227 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 Storage Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB Directions Served LR T TR L Maximum Queue (ft)41 219 251 35 Average Queue (ft)8 64 100 5 95th Queue (ft)30 181 225 24 Link Distance (ft)497 3442 3442 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 189 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 183 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 09 HY SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.1 3.7 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)47.0 47.6 1.7 26.9 28.9 11.7 50.6 26.8 21.7 46.9 21.0 2.9 Travel Dist (mi)1.0 1.5 2.0 27.1 4.0 20.5 2.0 33.9 7.4 6.1 34.5 1.9 Travel Time (hr)0.3 0.4 0.2 2.3 0.3 1.2 0.6 5.9 1.2 1.8 4.8 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)3 4 18 13 13 17 3 6 6 4 7 17 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.2 0.6 0.2 2.0 0.4 0.5 1.8 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)11.2 11.5 23.4 25.1 26.3 31.6 11.5 16.7 19.9 12.1 19.6 39.3 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 8 1 6 0 10 2 2 9 0 CO Emissions (g)12 17 23 260 28 163 16 296 52 65 265 8 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 2 25 2 17 1 34 5 6 31 1 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 6 1 2 5 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)24.9 Travel Dist (mi)142.0 Travel Time (hr)19.1 Avg Speed (mph)8 Fuel Used (gal)7.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)20.0 HC Emissions (g)39 CO Emissions (g)1204 NOx Emissions (g)126 Density (ft/veh)222 Occupancy (veh)19 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)18.1 6.4 1.9 2.0 8.9 2.3 2.2 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.7 43.3 0.3 5.6 393.2 443.3 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.2 13.8 16.1 Avg Speed (mph)11 15 22 17 26 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.2 11.1 14.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)29.3 34.5 15.6 19.5 35.4 35.5 31.6 HC Emissions (g)0 0 33 0 1 103 137 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1236 5 17 1905 3166 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 139 1 2 280 423 Density (ft/veh)570 Occupancy (veh)0 0 2 0 0 14 16 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 184 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 09 HY SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)17.5 7.0 4.0 3.3 9.8 2.0 3.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.6 0.6 523.7 15.0 0.3 46.5 586.6 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.0 18.5 0.5 0.0 2.2 21.4 Avg Speed (mph)11 15 28 28 12 21 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 14.8 0.4 0.0 2.8 18.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)28.4 34.2 35.5 36.2 19.6 16.6 32.6 HC Emissions (g)0 0 133 2 0 32 167 CO Emissions (g)1 1 2466 44 3 1149 3665 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 374 6 0 134 514 Density (ft/veh)386 Occupancy (veh)0 0 19 1 0 2 21 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)31.7 Travel Dist (mi)2179.0 Travel Time (hr)93.3 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)69.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.5 HC Emissions (g)626 CO Emissions (g)13668 NOx Emissions (g)1828 Density (ft/veh)232 Occupancy (veh)93 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 185 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr - No Build 08/26/2022 09 HY SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T T R Maximum Queue (ft)90 56 145 148 150 236 240 191 218 233 141 Average Queue (ft)36 3 66 48 41 162 177 82 125 132 18 95th Queue (ft)76 28 124 114 110 243 250 151 193 206 101 Link Distance (ft)288 916 221 221 227 227 Upstream Blk Time (%)2 4 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)7 15 0 1 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 75 70 115 70 Storage Blk Time (%) 35 0 9 2 2 35 4 9 28 Queuing Penalty (veh) 15 0 13 4 6 13 12 11 11 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB SB SB Directions Served LR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)42 33 3 19 Average Queue (ft)10 5 0 1 95th Queue (ft)35 25 3 12 Link Distance (ft)465 2686 2686 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)80 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB Directions Served LR T TR L Maximum Queue (ft)37 82 123 32 Average Queue (ft)10 7 16 3 95th Queue (ft)32 42 73 18 Link Distance (ft)497 3442 3442 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)75 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 109 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 186 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing AM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/26/2022 01 Exist AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 4.0 3.6 0.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)33.7 27.4 0.8 23.5 21.2 7.3 35.0 16.1 7.6 33.0 16.1 8.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.3 0.4 41.8 4.2 12.4 0.8 11.7 3.9 2.5 21.9 0.9 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.1 0.0 3.3 0.3 0.6 0.2 1.4 0.3 0.5 2.6 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)4 5 19 14 15 20 4 9 12 5 9 11 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)16.2 16.9 34.7 26.3 28.4 34.2 17.0 24.4 37.8 16.0 21.8 35.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 12 1 4 0 3 1 1 7 0 CO Emissions (g)2 2 1 364 25 96 4 88 15 22 202 3 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 0 36 2 11 0 9 2 2 21 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)17.6 Travel Dist (mi)101.1 Travel Time (hr)9.4 Avg Speed (mph)11 Fuel Used (gal)4.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)25.5 HC Emissions (g)28 CO Emissions (g)823 NOx Emissions (g)83 Density (ft/veh)437 Occupancy (veh)9 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)7.0 3.2 1.3 1.0 3.6 1.8 1.7 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.5 15.9 0.1 2.8 234.8 254.4 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 8.2 9.0 Avg Speed (mph)15 18 22 18 27 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 6.7 7.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)37.4 37.0 15.7 22.8 36.5 34.9 32.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 17 0 0 61 78 CO Emissions (g)1 1 600 2 8 1171 1783 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 57 0 1 175 233 Density (ft/veh)1007 Occupancy (veh)0 0 1 0 0 8 9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 187 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing AM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/26/2022 01 Exist AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)3.0 0.2 0.0 2.0 1.4 Travel Dist (mi)0.1 20.2 0.3 37.8 58.4 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 2.5 Avg Speed (mph)17 29 22 21 23 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.5 0.0 2.3 2.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)36.7 37.4 54.1 16.5 20.6 HC Emissions (g)0 6 0 27 33 CO Emissions (g)0 90 0 982 1073 NOx Emissions (g)0 16 0 110 126 Density (ft/veh)713 Occupancy (veh)0 1 0 2 3 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)23.7 Travel Dist (mi)1193.6 Travel Time (hr)48.9 Avg Speed (mph)25 Fuel Used (gal)37.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.8 HC Emissions (g)371 CO Emissions (g)8032 NOx Emissions (g)1081 Density (ft/veh)447 Occupancy (veh)49 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 188 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing AM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/26/2022 01 Exist AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)42 179 192 49 106 126 102 214 195 Average Queue (ft)10 101 51 12 49 59 34 102 62 95th Queue (ft)34 163 121 38 87 105 75 177 143 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%)9 13 1 0 0 10 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 13 1 0 1 5 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB SB Directions Served LR L T Maximum Queue (ft)31 22 16 Average Queue (ft)8 1 1 95th Queue (ft)30 11 9 Link Distance (ft)453 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft)18 Average Queue (ft)1 95th Queue (ft)10 Link Distance (ft)469 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 20 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 189 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/26/2022 02 Exist PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.3 4.0 3.8 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)45.4 44.1 1.3 48.7 43.6 14.5 63.6 26.5 23.2 58.1 17.4 7.7 Travel Dist (mi)0.9 0.7 1.4 20.5 2.1 14.4 1.8 54.6 15.4 5.5 24.7 0.9 Travel Time (hr)0.3 0.2 0.1 2.5 0.2 0.9 0.7 9.3 2.6 1.9 3.0 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)3 4 18 9 10 16 3 6 6 3 8 12 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 3.5 0.8 0.5 1.2 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)12.0 12.2 25.8 20.6 22.8 30.4 9.3 15.7 18.1 10.3 20.1 35.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 6 0 5 0 18 5 1 8 0 CO Emissions (g)8 6 11 194 16 130 20 510 127 54 253 3 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 1 17 1 14 2 65 14 5 28 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 9 3 2 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)26.9 Travel Dist (mi)142.8 Travel Time (hr)21.6 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)8.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)17.8 HC Emissions (g)44 CO Emissions (g)1333 NOx Emissions (g)149 Density (ft/veh)187 Occupancy (veh)21 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)30.8 9.8 2.0 2.3 17.4 2.3 2.2 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.7 61.9 0.6 3.3 287.7 354.6 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.8 0.0 0.1 10.1 13.1 Avg Speed (mph)7 13 22 17 23 29 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.1 8.2 12.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)22.5 31.8 16.3 20.2 34.3 35.0 29.1 HC Emissions (g)0 0 43 0 0 76 119 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1528 9 10 1478 3028 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 188 1 1 214 405 Density (ft/veh)691 Occupancy (veh)0 0 3 0 0 10 13 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 190 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/26/2022 02 Exist PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)42.5 8.0 8.2 2.5 6.4 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 88.3 4.0 34.6 127.4 Travel Time (hr)0.1 5.9 0.3 1.7 8.0 Avg Speed (mph)6 15 13 20 16 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 2.7 0.1 1.9 4.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.4 32.4 34.5 18.2 26.7 HC Emissions (g)0 19 1 21 41 CO Emissions (g)2 485 23 738 1247 NOx Emissions (g)0 59 3 83 145 Density (ft/veh)225 Occupancy (veh)0 6 0 2 8 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)39.2 Travel Dist (mi)2459.7 Travel Time (hr)109.7 Avg Speed (mph)22 Fuel Used (gal)79.7 Fuel Eff. (mpg)30.9 HC Emissions (g)733 CO Emissions (g)16320 NOx Emissions (g)2165 Density (ft/veh)198 Occupancy (veh)109 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 191 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/26/2022 02 Exist PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)79 12 152 169 204 264 271 186 243 218 Average Queue (ft)26 0 77 59 43 232 241 88 130 80 95th Queue (ft)64 7 138 126 133 280 275 162 209 173 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)15 21 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)97 137 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 28 0 13 2 0 36 10 16 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 13 3 2 11 22 17 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB SB SB Directions Served LR TR L T Maximum Queue (ft)37 5 31 24 Average Queue (ft)11 0 4 1 95th Queue (ft)35 5 22 13 Link Distance (ft)453 228 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB B6 B6 SB SB Directions Served R T TR T T T T Maximum Queue (ft)36 314 356 22 48 20 9 Average Queue (ft)6 112 148 1 3 1 0 95th Queue (ft)25 264 306 17 27 12 7 Link Distance (ft)469 303 303 3061 3061 233 233 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 311 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 192 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing SAT Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 03 Exist SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.3 4.0 3.7 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)38.6 38.7 1.6 41.1 38.1 15.6 58.7 30.8 25.6 57.8 26.1 12.6 Travel Dist (mi)0.9 1.2 2.4 30.1 3.9 21.4 2.1 36.0 7.4 6.3 34.5 2.1 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.3 0.2 3.2 0.4 1.4 0.7 6.9 1.3 2.2 5.8 0.2 Avg Speed (mph)4 4 17 10 11 16 3 5 6 3 6 9 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.4 0.2 0.7 0.2 2.3 0.4 0.6 2.1 0.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)12.9 12.4 25.6 22.0 24.5 30.5 10.3 15.5 18.3 9.9 16.1 25.8 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 8 1 5 0 11 2 2 13 0 CO Emissions (g)9 13 20 281 25 157 22 320 59 68 399 10 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 2 25 2 16 2 36 6 7 45 1 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 1 7 1 2 6 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)30.3 Travel Dist (mi)148.2 Travel Time (hr)22.8 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)8.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg)17.9 HC Emissions (g)43 CO Emissions (g)1384 NOx Emissions (g)143 Density (ft/veh)178 Occupancy (veh)23 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)25.0 7.0 1.9 1.6 9.3 4.1 3.1 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 1.0 44.6 0.3 5.2 398.4 449.7 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.0 0.0 0.2 14.3 16.7 Avg Speed (mph)8 14 22 17 25 28 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.1 11.4 14.5 Fuel Eff. (mpg)23.2 33.0 15.6 19.0 36.3 34.9 31.0 HC Emissions (g)0 0 33 0 1 107 141 CO Emissions (g)1 3 1225 4 16 2233 3482 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 140 0 2 308 451 Density (ft/veh)544 Occupancy (veh)0 0 2 0 0 14 17 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 193 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing SAT Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 03 Exist SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)13.2 1.7 1.2 4.2 3.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.5 55.9 1.8 49.3 107.5 Travel Time (hr)0.0 2.3 0.1 2.8 5.2 Avg Speed (mph)12 25 20 18 21 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 1.4 0.0 2.9 4.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg)30.8 39.9 50.4 17.2 24.9 HC Emissions (g)0 12 0 31 43 CO Emissions (g)1 241 6 1106 1353 NOx Emissions (g)0 33 1 125 159 Density (ft/veh)345 Occupancy (veh)0 2 0 3 5 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6 Total Del/Veh (s)39.9 Travel Dist (mi)2237.6 Travel Time (hr)100.8 Avg Speed (mph)22 Fuel Used (gal)73.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)30.6 HC Emissions (g)674 CO Emissions (g)15104 NOx Emissions (g)1992 Density (ft/veh)216 Occupancy (veh)100 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 194 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing SAT Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 03 Exist SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)90 56 181 248 193 258 261 187 259 237 Average Queue (ft)31 4 104 86 48 188 206 115 193 157 95th Queue (ft)75 28 176 178 133 263 273 209 271 253 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)2 5 5 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)10 22 18 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 30 0 19 5 0 27 14 34 Queuing Penalty (veh) 13 0 27 8 0 11 43 38 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB SB SB Directions Served LR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)44 48 182 105 Average Queue (ft)13 5 26 5 95th Queue (ft)40 30 108 51 Link Distance (ft)453 2676 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%)2 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served R T TR T T Maximum Queue (ft)34 120 152 164 80 Average Queue (ft)5 11 19 8 3 95th Queue (ft)24 59 81 75 44 Link Distance (ft)469 303 303 233 233 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 195 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative AM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 04 Cuml AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 4.5 3.6 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)26.6 29.4 1.0 23.5 21.8 7.7 35.0 15.0 6.8 34.9 15.1 5.8 Travel Dist (mi)0.2 0.4 0.4 42.9 4.1 12.7 0.7 11.7 3.6 2.4 22.4 0.9 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 0.0 3.4 0.3 0.7 0.2 1.3 0.3 0.5 2.5 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)5 5 18 14 15 20 5 9 12 4 9 13 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.5 17.7 31.0 26.4 28.4 34.1 17.1 25.0 38.7 15.6 22.3 38.0 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 14 1 4 0 3 0 1 8 0 CO Emissions (g)1 2 2 393 26 102 4 81 10 20 219 3 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 0 39 2 12 0 9 1 2 24 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)17.1 Travel Dist (mi)102.3 Travel Time (hr)9.4 Avg Speed (mph)11 Fuel Used (gal)4.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)25.8 HC Emissions (g)30 CO Emissions (g)864 NOx Emissions (g)90 Density (ft/veh)442 Occupancy (veh)9 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)7.9 3.2 1.3 1.5 4.0 1.9 1.7 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.4 16.1 0.1 2.4 238.1 257.5 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 8.3 9.2 Avg Speed (mph)14 18 23 17 27 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 6.8 7.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)35.4 39.2 15.9 18.4 36.4 35.0 32.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 14 0 0 73 88 CO Emissions (g)1 1 547 2 7 1376 1934 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 51 0 1 204 256 Density (ft/veh)993 Occupancy (veh)0 0 1 0 0 8 9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 196 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative AM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 04 Cuml AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)4.0 0.2 0.1 2.0 1.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.1 19.7 0.5 38.9 59.2 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.7 0.0 1.9 2.6 Avg Speed (mph)17 29 22 21 23 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.5 0.0 2.3 2.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)35.1 37.2 54.4 16.6 20.5 HC Emissions (g)0 5 0 29 34 CO Emissions (g)0 77 1 1025 1103 NOx Emissions (g)0 14 0 116 130 Density (ft/veh)700 Occupancy (veh)0 1 0 2 3 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)23.2 Travel Dist (mi)1209.7 Travel Time (hr)49.4 Avg Speed (mph)25 Fuel Used (gal)38.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.9 HC Emissions (g)381 CO Emissions (g)8193 NOx Emissions (g)1103 Density (ft/veh)442 Occupancy (veh)49 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 197 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative AM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 04 Cuml AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)39 4 180 216 49 105 120 129 192 167 Average Queue (ft)10 0 102 58 12 47 55 35 101 59 95th Queue (ft)34 4 169 143 39 84 98 78 166 129 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%)9 0 14 1 0 0 10 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 14 1 0 0 5 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB Directions Served LR L Maximum Queue (ft)33 18 Average Queue (ft)8 1 95th Queue (ft)30 9 Link Distance (ft)453 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft)18 Average Queue (ft)1 95th Queue (ft)11 Link Distance (ft)469 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 21 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 198 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative PM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 05 Cuml PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.2 3.8 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)42.4 49.0 1.4 47.2 45.2 15.2 66.8 26.1 23.0 61.3 16.4 9.3 Travel Dist (mi)0.8 0.8 1.4 21.3 2.6 14.2 1.6 54.1 16.2 6.0 24.6 0.8 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.2 0.1 2.5 0.3 0.9 0.6 9.1 2.7 2.2 2.9 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)4 3 18 9 9 16 3 6 6 3 8 10 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 3.4 0.9 0.6 1.2 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)11.9 11.1 26.4 20.7 22.8 30.5 8.9 15.9 18.2 9.9 20.1 32.7 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 6 0 5 0 20 4 2 6 0 CO Emissions (g)8 8 12 194 17 131 19 534 121 68 225 3 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 1 17 1 14 2 68 14 6 24 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 9 3 2 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)26.8 Travel Dist (mi)144.3 Travel Time (hr)21.9 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)8.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)17.7 HC Emissions (g)44 CO Emissions (g)1340 NOx Emissions (g)148 Density (ft/veh)185 Occupancy (veh)22 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)24.9 11.7 2.0 2.1 12.2 2.4 2.2 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.6 61.2 0.7 3.4 291.0 357.2 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.7 0.0 0.1 10.2 13.2 Avg Speed (mph)8 12 22 17 23 29 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.1 8.3 12.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)23.6 30.9 16.3 19.5 34.2 35.0 29.2 HC Emissions (g)0 0 47 0 0 83 130 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1594 11 10 1586 3203 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 195 1 1 230 428 Density (ft/veh)687 Occupancy (veh)0 0 3 0 0 10 13 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 199 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative PM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 05 Cuml PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)39.0 8.2 7.6 2.4 6.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.5 88.2 4.5 34.8 128.0 Travel Time (hr)0.1 6.0 0.3 1.7 8.1 Avg Speed (mph)6 15 13 21 16 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 2.7 0.1 1.9 4.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)19.9 32.2 34.6 18.1 26.6 HC Emissions (g)0 20 1 17 38 CO Emissions (g)2 500 26 691 1218 NOx Emissions (g)0 62 3 75 139 Density (ft/veh)223 Occupancy (veh)0 6 0 2 8 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)38.9 Travel Dist (mi)2462.3 Travel Time (hr)110.0 Avg Speed (mph)22 Fuel Used (gal)79.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)30.8 HC Emissions (g)748 CO Emissions (g)16568 NOx Emissions (g)2201 Density (ft/veh)198 Occupancy (veh)110 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 200 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative PM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 05 Cuml PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)77 34 170 192 204 267 274 185 234 212 Average Queue (ft)27 2 80 63 43 231 241 95 126 80 95th Queue (ft)63 18 140 135 133 281 275 165 203 170 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)14 20 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)93 133 1 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 29 0 12 3 0 35 13 15 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 12 3 1 11 30 17 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB SB Directions Served LR L T Maximum Queue (ft)42 31 26 Average Queue (ft)10 3 1 95th Queue (ft)35 19 13 Link Distance (ft)453 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB B6 B6 Directions Served R T TR T T Maximum Queue (ft)34 327 346 35 47 Average Queue (ft)6 115 146 2 3 95th Queue (ft)26 274 302 28 38 Link Distance (ft)469 303 303 3061 3061 Upstream Blk Time (%)1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 309 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 201 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative SAT Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 06 Cuml SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.3 4.0 3.6 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)40.9 40.2 1.7 40.8 40.0 16.0 60.1 31.2 25.7 61.1 26.2 12.8 Travel Dist (mi)0.9 1.2 2.3 31.4 5.0 22.9 2.0 36.1 8.4 6.7 34.8 2.0 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.3 0.2 3.4 0.5 1.5 0.7 7.0 1.5 2.4 5.9 0.2 Avg Speed (mph)4 4 17 10 10 16 3 5 6 3 6 9 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.4 0.2 0.8 0.2 2.4 0.5 0.7 2.2 0.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)12.5 12.3 25.1 22.2 24.1 30.3 10.2 15.3 18.2 9.6 16.0 25.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 10 1 9 0 12 2 4 14 0 CO Emissions (g)10 12 20 305 33 213 20 348 64 101 414 9 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 2 28 3 24 2 39 6 10 46 1 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 1 7 2 2 6 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)30.8 Travel Dist (mi)153.6 Travel Time (hr)23.8 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)8.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)17.9 HC Emissions (g)53 CO Emissions (g)1549 NOx Emissions (g)163 Density (ft/veh)170 Occupancy (veh)24 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)30.2 7.8 1.9 1.9 10.1 4.3 3.2 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.9 45.1 0.3 5.0 408.0 459.6 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.1 0.0 0.2 14.8 17.2 Avg Speed (mph)7 14 22 17 25 28 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.1 11.8 14.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)22.1 33.6 15.5 20.6 34.2 34.7 30.9 HC Emissions (g)0 0 39 0 1 118 158 CO Emissions (g)1 3 1354 4 16 2417 3794 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 157 0 2 340 500 Density (ft/veh)530 Occupancy (veh)0 0 2 0 0 15 17 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 202 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative SAT Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 06 Cuml SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)12.2 1.9 1.0 4.1 3.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 57.2 1.6 49.9 109.1 Travel Time (hr)0.0 2.4 0.1 2.8 5.3 Avg Speed (mph)12 24 21 18 20 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 1.4 0.0 2.9 4.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.0 39.9 50.5 17.5 25.2 HC Emissions (g)0 13 1 31 45 CO Emissions (g)1 268 9 1100 1378 NOx Emissions (g)0 36 1 126 164 Density (ft/veh)338 Occupancy (veh)0 2 0 3 5 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6 Total Del/Veh (s)40.6 Travel Dist (mi)2281.0 Travel Time (hr)103.4 Avg Speed (mph)22 Fuel Used (gal)74.7 Fuel Eff. (mpg)30.6 HC Emissions (g)741 CO Emissions (g)16224 NOx Emissions (g)2167 Density (ft/veh)211 Occupancy (veh)103 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 203 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative SAT Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 06 Cuml SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)98 51 180 259 191 255 266 187 272 243 Average Queue (ft)32 3 108 96 44 194 213 122 199 166 95th Queue (ft)75 26 178 194 129 266 279 213 275 262 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)3 7 5 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)14 29 22 4 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 31 0 19 6 0 29 18 36 Queuing Penalty (veh) 13 0 30 11 1 12 58 45 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB SB SB Directions Served LR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)39 36 207 125 Average Queue (ft)12 4 29 7 95th Queue (ft)37 21 120 59 Link Distance (ft)453 2676 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%)2 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served R T TR T T Maximum Queue (ft)34 113 142 94 64 Average Queue (ft)4 14 27 5 2 95th Queue (ft)22 68 99 52 39 Link Distance (ft)469 303 303 233 233 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 238 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 204 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year AM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 07 HY AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 4.4 3.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)26.1 31.7 0.9 24.9 21.7 7.0 32.7 15.7 7.6 33.6 15.0 5.1 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.4 0.4 38.6 4.2 12.5 0.6 11.4 3.9 2.4 22.7 1.0 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.1 0.0 3.1 0.3 0.6 0.1 1.3 0.3 0.5 2.5 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)5 5 19 13 15 20 5 9 11 5 9 13 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.3 16.2 32.2 25.9 27.7 34.3 17.7 24.9 37.1 15.9 22.4 40.7 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 11 1 4 0 3 0 0 7 0 CO Emissions (g)3 3 2 333 30 108 3 76 11 18 212 3 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 0 32 2 12 0 8 1 2 23 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)17.2 Travel Dist (mi)98.5 Travel Time (hr)9.1 Avg Speed (mph)11 Fuel Used (gal)3.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)25.6 HC Emissions (g)26 CO Emissions (g)800 NOx Emissions (g)82 Density (ft/veh)451 Occupancy (veh)9 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)7.9 3.4 1.3 1.3 4.1 1.8 1.7 Travel Dist (mi)0.2 0.4 15.9 0.1 2.6 242.8 262.0 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 8.4 9.3 Avg Speed (mph)14 17 22 18 27 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 6.9 8.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)34.8 37.9 15.8 24.1 35.7 35.1 32.6 HC Emissions (g)0 0 15 0 0 65 80 CO Emissions (g)0 1 568 2 7 1247 1825 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 53 0 1 186 240 Density (ft/veh)980 Occupancy (veh)0 0 1 0 0 8 9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 205 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year AM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 07 HY AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)4.8 0.2 0.0 2.0 1.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.1 19.5 0.3 37.8 57.7 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.7 0.0 1.8 2.5 Avg Speed (mph)17 29 22 21 23 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.5 0.0 2.2 2.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)38.3 37.3 54.4 16.8 20.7 HC Emissions (g)0 5 0 27 31 CO Emissions (g)0 72 0 965 1038 NOx Emissions (g)0 13 0 107 120 Density (ft/veh)722 Occupancy (veh)0 1 0 2 2 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)23.2 Travel Dist (mi)1190.5 Travel Time (hr)48.6 Avg Speed (mph)25 Fuel Used (gal)37.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.9 HC Emissions (g)359 CO Emissions (g)7829 NOx Emissions (g)1052 Density (ft/veh)450 Occupancy (veh)48 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 206 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year AM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 07 HY AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)50 174 210 40 102 123 105 196 178 Average Queue (ft)13 97 56 10 48 56 33 102 62 95th Queue (ft)40 158 140 32 86 103 74 167 140 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 10 12 1 0 0 10 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 11 2 0 0 5 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB SB Directions Served LR L T Maximum Queue (ft)31 19 3 Average Queue (ft)7 1 0 95th Queue (ft)27 10 3 Link Distance (ft)453 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB SB SB Directions Served R T T Maximum Queue (ft)24 20 16 Average Queue (ft)1 1 1 95th Queue (ft)11 20 16 Link Distance (ft)469 233 233 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 18 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 207 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year PM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 08 HY PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.1 3.8 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)45.8 44.2 1.3 44.3 43.1 13.2 62.8 26.5 22.6 56.8 17.9 7.7 Travel Dist (mi)0.7 0.8 1.3 18.9 2.2 13.2 1.5 49.1 14.8 6.0 24.5 0.9 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.2 0.1 2.1 0.2 0.8 0.5 8.3 2.4 2.0 3.1 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)3 3 18 9 10 17 3 6 6 3 8 11 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.2 3.1 0.8 0.6 1.2 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)11.7 12.0 26.6 21.3 23.2 31.0 9.6 16.0 18.6 10.4 19.8 35.1 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 5 0 6 0 17 4 1 9 0 CO Emissions (g)6 7 11 182 14 133 16 474 119 58 265 3 NOx Emissions (g)0 1 1 16 1 16 1 59 13 5 29 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 8 2 2 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)26.6 Travel Dist (mi)133.9 Travel Time (hr)20.2 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)7.5 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.0 HC Emissions (g)44 CO Emissions (g)1287 NOx Emissions (g)143 Density (ft/veh)200 Occupancy (veh)20 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)24.0 9.0 1.9 2.3 12.2 2.5 2.3 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.7 55.6 0.6 3.8 291.0 351.9 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.5 0.0 0.2 10.2 13.0 Avg Speed (mph)9 13 22 17 24 29 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.1 8.3 11.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)25.1 31.0 16.3 19.5 35.2 35.1 29.6 HC Emissions (g)0 0 43 0 0 83 126 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1462 9 10 1600 3084 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 178 1 2 235 415 Density (ft/veh)701 Occupancy (veh)0 0 2 0 0 10 13 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 208 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year PM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 08 HY PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)21.5 5.8 5.9 2.6 4.8 Travel Dist (mi)0.5 80.5 4.1 33.8 119.0 Travel Time (hr)0.1 4.6 0.3 1.6 6.6 Avg Speed (mph)8 17 14 21 18 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 2.3 0.1 1.9 4.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg)24.7 34.8 38.0 18.2 27.6 HC Emissions (g)0 19 1 22 42 CO Emissions (g)1 439 19 766 1226 NOx Emissions (g)0 55 2 86 143 Density (ft/veh)271 Occupancy (veh)0 5 0 2 7 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)37.1 Travel Dist (mi)2308.9 Travel Time (hr)101.8 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)74.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.0 HC Emissions (g)732 CO Emissions (g)15991 NOx Emissions (g)2141 Density (ft/veh)214 Occupancy (veh)102 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 209 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year PM Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 08 HY PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)74 8 153 148 204 253 273 183 244 226 Average Queue (ft)25 0 73 53 38 220 233 91 134 89 95th Queue (ft)59 4 127 108 119 285 279 167 222 189 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)10 16 1 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)63 100 2 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 28 0 9 2 33 11 17 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 8 2 10 24 19 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB SB SB Directions Served LR TR L T Maximum Queue (ft)35 4 33 68 Average Queue (ft)10 0 4 4 95th Queue (ft)34 4 21 33 Link Distance (ft)453 228 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB B6 B6 SB Directions Served R T TR T T T Maximum Queue (ft)34 286 313 3 12 5 Average Queue (ft)6 75 108 0 1 0 95th Queue (ft)25 214 262 3 13 5 Link Distance (ft)469 303 303 3061 3061 233 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 236 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 210 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 09 HY SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 0.2 4.0 3.7 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)37.4 36.3 1.6 40.0 37.1 14.1 54.7 30.8 24.8 56.9 25.8 12.3 Travel Dist (mi)0.9 1.3 2.2 27.9 3.9 20.1 2.0 34.3 7.8 6.7 34.1 2.1 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.3 0.2 2.9 0.4 1.2 0.7 6.6 1.4 2.3 5.7 0.2 Avg Speed (mph)4 4 17 10 11 17 3 5 6 3 6 9 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.3 0.2 0.6 0.2 2.2 0.4 0.7 2.1 0.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)12.9 13.3 25.7 22.3 24.4 31.2 11.0 15.5 18.6 10.0 16.2 26.3 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 9 1 5 0 11 2 2 14 0 CO Emissions (g)9 13 19 279 25 146 20 326 55 72 402 10 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 2 26 2 15 2 37 6 7 45 1 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 1 7 1 2 6 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)29.8 Travel Dist (mi)143.4 Travel Time (hr)22.1 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)8.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.0 HC Emissions (g)44 CO Emissions (g)1375 NOx Emissions (g)144 Density (ft/veh)184 Occupancy (veh)22 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)28.4 7.3 1.8 2.1 9.6 4.0 3.1 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.8 42.6 0.2 5.5 401.4 450.8 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.2 14.4 16.7 Avg Speed (mph)8 14 22 17 25 28 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 2.7 0.0 0.2 11.5 14.5 Fuel Eff. (mpg)24.1 32.7 15.6 19.9 34.6 34.8 31.1 HC Emissions (g)0 0 33 0 1 115 149 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1218 3 18 2353 3594 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 138 0 2 329 470 Density (ft/veh)544 Occupancy (veh)0 0 2 0 0 14 17 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 211 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 09 HY SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)8.4 1.5 1.0 4.0 2.8 Travel Dist (mi)0.5 54.1 1.6 48.0 104.1 Travel Time (hr)0.0 2.2 0.1 2.7 5.0 Avg Speed (mph)14 25 20 18 21 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 1.4 0.0 2.8 4.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)35.5 40.0 50.6 17.4 25.1 HC Emissions (g)0 12 0 31 43 CO Emissions (g)1 235 2 1085 1324 NOx Emissions (g)0 32 0 123 156 Density (ft/veh)363 Occupancy (veh)0 2 0 3 5 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6 Total Del/Veh (s)39.2 Travel Dist (mi)2178.9 Travel Time (hr)97.9 Avg Speed (mph)22 Fuel Used (gal)71.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)30.6 HC Emissions (g)678 CO Emissions (g)15005 NOx Emissions (g)1989 Density (ft/veh)223 Occupancy (veh)98 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 212 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr - 3-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 09 HY SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)87 61 173 202 155 248 264 187 272 241 Average Queue (ft)33 4 95 77 38 181 200 123 192 154 95th Queue (ft)74 29 162 157 105 257 271 213 271 255 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)2 5 4 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)10 20 16 3 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 30 0 16 4 0 26 16 35 Queuing Penalty (veh) 13 0 23 7 0 10 49 43 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB SB SB Directions Served LR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)42 36 159 61 Average Queue (ft)11 4 21 3 95th Queue (ft)36 23 97 31 Link Distance (ft)453 2676 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%)1 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served R T TR T T Maximum Queue (ft)30 99 116 58 39 Average Queue (ft)5 8 18 3 1 95th Queue (ft)23 48 72 45 28 Link Distance (ft)469 303 303 233 233 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 193 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 213 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing AM Pk Hr -4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 01 Exist AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 4.3 3.6 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)26.7 29.9 1.0 24.1 22.5 7.7 35.8 16.7 7.9 33.8 15.0 10.3 Travel Dist (mi)0.2 0.4 0.4 41.5 4.2 13.5 0.8 11.6 3.8 2.5 22.4 1.0 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 0.0 3.3 0.3 0.7 0.2 1.4 0.3 0.5 2.5 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)5 5 18 13 14 20 4 8 11 5 9 10 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.9 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)16.5 17.3 31.6 26.3 28.1 34.3 16.8 24.1 36.8 16.5 23.8 32.1 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 15 1 4 0 3 0 0 6 0 CO Emissions (g)1 2 2 400 26 105 4 78 12 17 162 3 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 0 42 2 12 0 8 1 1 19 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)17.4 Travel Dist (mi)102.3 Travel Time (hr)9.5 Avg Speed (mph)11 Fuel Used (gal)3.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)26.1 HC Emissions (g)29 CO Emissions (g)814 NOx Emissions (g)87 Density (ft/veh)435 Occupancy (veh)9 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)9.3 3.8 1.3 1.5 3.7 1.5 1.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.4 16.3 0.1 2.1 239.3 258.6 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 8.2 9.1 Avg Speed (mph)14 17 22 17 27 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 6.7 7.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)34.9 36.5 15.5 19.8 34.1 35.6 32.9 HC Emissions (g)0 0 16 0 0 63 79 CO Emissions (g)1 1 593 2 6 1146 1750 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 55 0 1 178 234 Density (ft/veh)998 Occupancy (veh)0 0 1 0 0 8 9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 214 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing AM Pk Hr -4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 01 Exist AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)1.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 Travel Dist (mi)0.0 191.2 3.7 38.4 233.4 Travel Time (hr)0.0 6.5 0.1 1.7 8.4 Avg Speed (mph)18 29 29 23 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 5.4 0.1 2.3 7.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)35.8 35.6 36.5 16.4 29.9 HC Emissions (g)0 50 0 32 82 CO Emissions (g)0 872 11 1189 2072 NOx Emissions (g)0 144 1 119 265 Density (ft/veh)949 Occupancy (veh)0 7 0 2 8 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)21.5 Travel Dist (mi)1205.4 Travel Time (hr)48.6 Avg Speed (mph)25 Fuel Used (gal)37.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg)32.3 HC Emissions (g)368 CO Emissions (g)7896 NOx Emissions (g)1075 Density (ft/veh)435 Occupancy (veh)48 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 215 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing AM Pk Hr -4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 01 Exist AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)45 179 186 47 105 122 104 156 154 Average Queue (ft)11 101 56 13 48 58 34 72 76 95th Queue (ft)37 165 133 38 85 104 73 127 129 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%)8 14 1 0 0 3 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 13 2 0 0 1 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB Directions Served LR L Maximum Queue (ft)33 22 Average Queue (ft)8 1 95th Queue (ft)31 10 Link Distance (ft)453 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft)9 Average Queue (ft)1 95th Queue (ft)7 Link Distance (ft)469 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 17 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 216 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 02 Exist PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.1 3.8 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)45.2 44.8 1.3 46.1 46.6 14.4 64.9 25.6 22.5 53.3 16.8 14.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.8 0.7 1.4 20.2 2.4 13.9 1.8 53.6 15.8 5.6 25.3 0.8 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.2 0.1 2.3 0.3 0.9 0.7 8.8 2.6 1.8 3.0 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)3 3 18 9 9 16 3 6 6 3 8 8 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.5 0.2 3.3 0.9 0.5 1.2 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)11.7 11.4 26.5 20.9 22.1 30.6 9.2 16.0 18.5 11.1 21.7 27.0 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 6 0 6 0 17 4 2 9 0 CO Emissions (g)7 7 11 202 18 140 21 490 113 60 227 3 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 1 18 1 16 2 62 12 5 26 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 9 3 2 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)26.0 Travel Dist (mi)142.3 Travel Time (hr)21.1 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)7.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.2 HC Emissions (g)45 CO Emissions (g)1295 NOx Emissions (g)144 Density (ft/veh)192 Occupancy (veh)21 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)20.0 9.2 2.0 2.3 13.1 1.9 2.1 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.6 60.4 0.7 4.2 293.4 359.7 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.7 0.0 0.2 10.2 13.2 Avg Speed (mph)9 13 22 17 24 29 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.1 8.3 12.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)25.3 31.6 16.2 18.8 34.9 35.4 29.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 43 0 1 89 133 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1514 11 12 1599 3139 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 185 1 2 245 433 Density (ft/veh)687 Occupancy (veh)0 0 3 0 0 10 13 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 217 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing PM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 02 Exist PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)35.8 11.4 12.9 1.4 8.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 841.8 40.2 35.4 917.8 Travel Time (hr)0.1 32.7 1.6 1.5 35.9 Avg Speed (mph)6 26 25 23 26 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 24.5 1.2 2.0 27.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)19.1 34.4 34.5 17.9 33.2 HC Emissions (g)0 212 16 26 255 CO Emissions (g)1 4240 292 888 5421 NOx Emissions (g)0 605 44 99 748 Density (ft/veh)221 Occupancy (veh)0 33 2 2 36 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)36.7 Travel Dist (mi)2461.2 Travel Time (hr)108.2 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)79.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.1 HC Emissions (g)747 CO Emissions (g)16282 NOx Emissions (g)2181 Density (ft/veh)195 Occupancy (veh)108 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 218 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing PM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 02 Exist PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)73 17 160 170 180 264 271 174 193 198 Average Queue (ft)26 1 75 61 46 228 239 81 98 99 95th Queue (ft)60 10 136 126 137 281 273 146 171 170 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)13 19 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)82 123 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 28 0 10 2 0 34 8 8 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 9 2 1 11 18 8 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB NB SB SB Directions Served LR T TR L T Maximum Queue (ft)37 4 3 28 3 Average Queue (ft)11 0 0 4 0 95th Queue (ft)35 4 3 21 3 Link Distance (ft)453 228 228 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB Directions Served R T TR Maximum Queue (ft)29 316 341 Average Queue (ft)5 96 138 95th Queue (ft)24 253 303 Link Distance (ft)469 3422 3422 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 261 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 219 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing SAT Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 03 Exist SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.1 3.7 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)37.5 34.3 2.0 37.4 38.4 14.9 56.0 31.4 25.8 52.1 25.2 19.7 Travel Dist (mi)1.0 1.2 2.2 29.8 4.6 19.7 2.3 35.5 7.3 5.8 33.8 2.1 Travel Time (hr)0.3 0.3 0.2 3.0 0.4 1.2 0.7 6.9 1.3 1.8 5.5 0.3 Avg Speed (mph)4 4 17 10 11 16 3 5 6 3 6 7 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.3 0.2 0.6 0.2 2.3 0.4 0.5 1.9 0.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)13.2 13.4 25.3 22.7 23.9 30.8 10.8 15.3 18.3 11.2 17.5 21.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 9 1 6 0 11 2 2 11 0 CO Emissions (g)9 13 19 284 30 160 22 322 58 61 305 8 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 2 26 2 18 2 36 6 5 34 1 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 1 7 1 2 6 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)29.6 Travel Dist (mi)145.4 Travel Time (hr)22.1 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)7.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.4 HC Emissions (g)42 CO Emissions (g)1292 NOx Emissions (g)134 Density (ft/veh)184 Occupancy (veh)22 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)17.7 6.1 1.9 1.7 8.5 2.5 2.3 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 1.0 43.8 0.3 5.3 388.4 439.2 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.0 0.0 0.2 13.7 16.0 Avg Speed (mph)11 15 22 17 25 28 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.2 10.9 14.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)28.8 33.8 15.5 20.8 34.8 35.5 31.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 35 0 1 105 141 CO Emissions (g)1 3 1253 4 16 1973 3250 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 143 0 2 288 435 Density (ft/veh)568 Occupancy (veh)0 0 2 0 0 14 16 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 220 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Existing SAT Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 03 Exist SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)8.4 4.2 4.3 1.8 3.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 534.9 17.9 48.5 601.6 Travel Time (hr)0.0 19.0 0.7 2.2 21.9 Avg Speed (mph)14 28 27 22 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 15.1 0.5 3.0 18.5 Fuel Eff. (mpg)34.1 35.5 36.0 16.3 32.4 HC Emissions (g)0 138 9 37 184 CO Emissions (g)1 2558 159 1308 4025 NOx Emissions (g)0 384 27 150 561 Density (ft/veh)362 Occupancy (veh)0 19 1 2 22 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6 Total Del/Veh (s)36.1 Travel Dist (mi)2203.2 Travel Time (hr)97.1 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)70.7 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.2 HC Emissions (g)668 CO Emissions (g)14477 NOx Emissions (g)1938 Density (ft/veh)217 Occupancy (veh)97 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 221 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Existing SAT Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 03 Exist SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)97 63 181 212 193 248 265 183 234 252 Average Queue (ft)33 6 98 79 46 184 202 87 145 154 95th Queue (ft)78 36 171 160 124 263 277 159 219 234 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)3 6 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)12 23 2 5 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 29 1 15 4 0 28 8 21 Queuing Penalty (veh) 12 0 22 6 1 11 26 24 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LR TR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)39 3 31 36 63 Average Queue (ft)12 0 5 1 4 95th Queue (ft)38 0 22 18 30 Link Distance (ft)453 228 2676 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB Directions Served R T TR Maximum Queue (ft)27 81 130 Average Queue (ft)3 9 21 95th Queue (ft)19 48 83 Link Distance (ft)469 3422 3422 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 145 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 222 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative AM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 04 Cuml AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 4.1 3.6 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)33.1 29.2 1.1 24.4 22.6 8.0 35.5 17.1 8.1 36.4 15.2 9.9 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.3 0.4 43.3 4.5 13.5 0.7 12.2 4.0 2.6 23.4 1.0 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.1 0.0 3.5 0.3 0.7 0.2 1.5 0.4 0.6 2.6 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)5 5 18 13 14 20 5 8 11 4 9 10 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)15.8 16.1 31.5 26.1 27.7 33.7 17.2 23.8 36.3 15.5 23.5 33.1 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 14 1 5 0 3 0 0 7 0 CO Emissions (g)2 2 2 393 31 121 4 87 11 17 180 3 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 0 39 2 15 0 9 1 1 21 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)17.8 Travel Dist (mi)106.4 Travel Time (hr)10.0 Avg Speed (mph)11 Fuel Used (gal)4.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)25.7 HC Emissions (g)30 CO Emissions (g)852 NOx Emissions (g)91 Density (ft/veh)412 Occupancy (veh)10 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)6.9 3.1 1.4 1.2 5.7 1.5 1.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.4 16.9 0.1 2.2 250.1 270.2 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.1 8.6 9.5 Avg Speed (mph)15 18 22 18 27 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.1 7.0 8.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)35.6 38.4 15.6 20.0 36.2 35.6 32.9 HC Emissions (g)0 0 17 0 0 72 89 CO Emissions (g)1 1 620 3 7 1292 1924 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 60 0 1 201 263 Density (ft/veh)954 Occupancy (veh)0 0 1 0 0 9 10 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 223 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative AM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 04 Cuml AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)4.1 1.2 0.9 1.2 1.2 Travel Dist (mi)0.1 201.7 3.4 40.2 245.4 Travel Time (hr)0.0 6.9 0.1 1.8 8.8 Avg Speed (mph)18 29 28 23 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 5.7 0.1 2.4 8.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)40.2 35.7 38.0 16.5 30.0 HC Emissions (g)0 56 0 33 89 CO Emissions (g)0 969 9 1220 2198 NOx Emissions (g)0 160 1 122 283 Density (ft/veh)902 Occupancy (veh)0 7 0 2 9 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)22.1 Travel Dist (mi)1262.1 Travel Time (hr)51.1 Avg Speed (mph)25 Fuel Used (gal)39.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)32.3 HC Emissions (g)394 CO Emissions (g)8385 NOx Emissions (g)1148 Density (ft/veh)414 Occupancy (veh)51 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 224 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative AM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 04 Cuml AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)46 4 179 224 47 124 122 92 170 175 Average Queue (ft)11 0 105 62 12 53 60 34 72 78 95th Queue (ft)37 4 171 150 37 100 109 69 130 139 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 10 0 15 1 0 0 4 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 15 2 0 0 2 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB Directions Served LR L Maximum Queue (ft)33 18 Average Queue (ft)8 1 95th Queue (ft)30 9 Link Distance (ft)453 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft)21 Average Queue (ft)1 95th Queue (ft)12 Link Distance (ft)469 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 19 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 225 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative PM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 05 Cuml PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.0 3.8 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)50.3 47.6 1.5 48.1 40.7 14.7 65.3 26.6 23.1 56.1 16.7 10.7 Travel Dist (mi)0.8 0.8 1.4 21.8 2.6 14.9 1.8 53.8 15.8 5.8 24.5 0.7 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.2 0.1 2.6 0.3 0.9 0.7 9.1 2.6 2.0 3.0 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)3 3 18 9 10 16 3 6 6 3 8 10 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 3.4 0.9 0.5 1.1 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)11.2 11.3 27.0 20.6 23.4 30.6 9.1 15.8 18.2 10.8 21.5 32.2 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 7 0 5 0 20 4 2 5 0 CO Emissions (g)7 9 11 226 17 134 21 537 121 66 165 2 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 1 20 1 15 2 68 14 5 18 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 9 3 2 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)26.9 Travel Dist (mi)144.9 Travel Time (hr)21.8 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)8.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.0 HC Emissions (g)45 CO Emissions (g)1316 NOx Emissions (g)146 Density (ft/veh)185 Occupancy (veh)22 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)24.7 8.9 2.0 2.4 16.2 1.8 2.1 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.7 61.1 0.6 3.6 288.9 355.2 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.1 2.7 0.0 0.2 10.0 13.1 Avg Speed (mph)8 13 22 17 23 29 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.1 8.2 12.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)23.4 31.8 16.2 19.6 34.2 35.4 29.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 47 0 0 87 135 CO Emissions (g)2 2 1600 9 10 1550 3173 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 196 1 1 238 437 Density (ft/veh)695 Occupancy (veh)0 0 3 0 0 10 13 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 226 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative PM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 05 Cuml PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)25.9 11.9 11.8 1.4 8.8 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 846.3 40.5 34.8 921.9 Travel Time (hr)0.0 33.0 1.6 1.5 36.1 Avg Speed (mph)8 26 25 23 26 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 24.6 1.2 2.0 27.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)23.4 34.4 33.8 17.6 33.2 HC Emissions (g)0 233 12 20 265 CO Emissions (g)1 4585 239 808 5633 NOx Emissions (g)0 659 35 83 778 Density (ft/veh)220 Occupancy (veh)0 33 2 2 36 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)37.5 Travel Dist (mi)2464.2 Travel Time (hr)109.0 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)79.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.1 HC Emissions (g)758 CO Emissions (g)16547 NOx Emissions (g)2216 Density (ft/veh)193 Occupancy (veh)109 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 227 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative PM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 05 Cuml PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)76 29 163 182 204 263 277 154 178 171 Average Queue (ft)27 2 83 61 44 234 241 81 90 91 95th Queue (ft)65 19 143 127 130 279 279 137 152 150 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)14 20 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)91 132 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 29 0 13 2 35 10 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 8 0 12 3 11 24 7 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB SB SB Directions Served LR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)46 32 3 5 Average Queue (ft)11 4 0 0 95th Queue (ft)37 21 3 5 Link Distance (ft)453 2676 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB Directions Served R T TR Maximum Queue (ft)32 303 346 Average Queue (ft)4 106 143 95th Queue (ft)22 258 302 Link Distance (ft)469 3422 3422 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 288 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 228 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative SAT Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 06 Cuml SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.0 3.6 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)37.9 38.8 1.5 40.9 39.6 17.1 56.8 31.9 27.7 55.9 25.1 18.3 Travel Dist (mi)0.9 1.1 2.1 30.9 4.4 23.1 2.3 37.1 8.3 6.8 35.8 2.1 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.3 0.2 3.3 0.4 1.5 0.8 7.4 1.6 2.3 5.8 0.3 Avg Speed (mph)4 4 17 10 10 15 3 5 5 3 6 7 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.4 0.2 0.8 0.2 2.5 0.5 0.6 2.1 0.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)13.2 12.4 25.9 22.1 23.8 29.8 10.4 15.0 17.4 10.5 17.3 22.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 10 1 9 0 13 2 2 13 0 CO Emissions (g)8 11 17 308 29 222 24 358 63 79 333 8 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 2 29 2 25 2 41 6 7 38 1 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 2 1 7 2 2 6 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)30.6 Travel Dist (mi)154.9 Travel Time (hr)24.1 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)8.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.1 HC Emissions (g)50 CO Emissions (g)1461 NOx Emissions (g)154 Density (ft/veh)168 Occupancy (veh)24 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)19.0 8.1 1.9 2.0 11.2 2.8 2.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.2 1.0 46.4 0.4 5.1 416.1 469.2 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.1 0.0 0.2 14.7 17.2 Avg Speed (mph)9 14 22 17 24 28 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.2 11.7 14.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)26.2 32.8 15.4 19.7 34.3 35.5 31.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 39 0 1 114 154 CO Emissions (g)1 3 1378 6 14 2126 3527 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 158 1 2 316 477 Density (ft/veh)530 Occupancy (veh)0 0 2 0 0 15 17 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 229 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Cumulative SAT Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 06 Cuml SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)12.8 4.8 4.3 1.8 3.3 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 564.5 13.6 50.9 629.5 Travel Time (hr)0.0 20.2 0.5 2.3 23.1 Avg Speed (mph)11 28 27 22 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 15.9 0.4 3.1 19.4 Fuel Eff. (mpg)29.7 35.5 36.5 16.6 32.5 HC Emissions (g)0 157 9 37 203 CO Emissions (g)1 2882 153 1296 4331 NOx Emissions (g)0 439 25 154 618 Density (ft/veh)344 Occupancy (veh)0 20 1 2 23 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.6 Total Del/Veh (s)37.9 Travel Dist (mi)2327.3 Travel Time (hr)103.5 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)74.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.1 HC Emissions (g)729 CO Emissions (g)15617 NOx Emissions (g)2109 Density (ft/veh)204 Occupancy (veh)103 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 230 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Cumulative SAT Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 06 Cuml SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)96 50 181 238 182 254 265 187 241 246 Average Queue (ft)30 3 106 93 50 200 215 108 163 167 95th Queue (ft)70 26 172 190 136 272 278 192 243 246 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)4 8 1 2 Queuing Penalty (veh)17 35 6 7 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 30 0 21 7 0 31 13 23 Queuing Penalty (veh) 13 0 32 12 1 13 42 29 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LR TR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)42 8 36 67 91 Average Queue (ft)12 0 5 4 7 95th Queue (ft)37 6 24 32 44 Link Distance (ft)453 228 2676 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB Directions Served R T TR T Maximum Queue (ft)30 122 146 30 Average Queue (ft)5 16 31 1 95th Queue (ft)23 72 102 31 Link Distance (ft)469 3422 3422 233 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 206 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 231 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year AM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 07 HY AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 3.9 3.7 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)28.9 25.5 0.9 24.5 22.6 7.0 35.0 16.5 8.0 34.5 13.9 10.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.2 0.3 0.3 38.7 4.0 12.0 0.6 11.2 3.5 2.6 21.6 1.0 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.1 0.0 3.1 0.3 0.6 0.1 1.3 0.3 0.6 2.3 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)5 5 18 13 14 20 5 8 11 4 10 10 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.9 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)16.9 17.6 33.4 26.2 27.1 34.7 17.5 24.3 36.7 16.3 24.5 31.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 13 1 3 0 3 0 0 6 0 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1 357 27 86 4 80 10 16 162 3 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 0 36 2 10 0 9 1 1 19 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.8 Total Del/Veh (s)17.1 Travel Dist (mi)96.1 Travel Time (hr)8.9 Avg Speed (mph)11 Fuel Used (gal)3.7 Fuel Eff. (mpg)26.1 HC Emissions (g)26 CO Emissions (g)749 NOx Emissions (g)80 Density (ft/veh)465 Occupancy (veh)9 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)6.9 3.1 1.3 1.5 3.2 1.5 1.5 Travel Dist (mi)0.3 0.3 15.4 0.1 2.3 233.9 252.3 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 8.1 8.9 Avg Speed (mph)15 17 22 18 27 29 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 6.6 7.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)35.7 38.8 15.8 19.9 36.6 35.5 33.0 HC Emissions (g)0 0 14 0 0 62 77 CO Emissions (g)1 1 544 2 7 1124 1678 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 51 0 1 172 224 Density (ft/veh)1022 Occupancy (veh)0 0 1 0 0 8 9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 232 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year AM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 07 HY AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 Travel Dist (mi)0.0 181.8 3.2 36.7 221.8 Travel Time (hr)0.0 6.2 0.1 1.6 7.9 Avg Speed (mph)17 29 28 23 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 5.1 0.1 2.2 7.4 Fuel Eff. (mpg)36.1 35.5 36.9 16.7 30.0 HC Emissions (g)0 53 0 31 84 CO Emissions (g)0 908 10 1125 2043 NOx Emissions (g)0 150 1 112 263 Density (ft/veh)999 Occupancy (veh)0 6 0 2 8 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.9 Total Del/Veh (s)21.1 Travel Dist (mi)1150.9 Travel Time (hr)46.3 Avg Speed (mph)25 Fuel Used (gal)35.6 Fuel Eff. (mpg)32.4 HC Emissions (g)357 CO Emissions (g)7578 NOx Emissions (g)1035 Density (ft/veh)456 Occupancy (veh)46 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 233 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year AM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 07 HY AM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)41 4 175 190 43 112 118 80 134 139 Average Queue (ft)9 0 96 53 10 49 55 35 65 71 95th Queue (ft)32 0 160 130 34 91 102 69 116 120 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%)8 0 13 1 0 0 2 Queuing Penalty (veh) 1 0 12 2 0 0 1 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB SB Directions Served LR L Maximum Queue (ft)31 18 Average Queue (ft)7 1 95th Queue (ft)27 9 Link Distance (ft)453 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB Directions Served R Maximum Queue (ft)15 Average Queue (ft)1 95th Queue (ft)7 Link Distance (ft)469 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 16 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 234 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year PM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 08 HY PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 4.1 3.9 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)44.7 42.1 1.4 45.5 38.7 12.1 59.6 25.7 22.0 53.2 16.4 11.6 Travel Dist (mi)0.7 0.8 1.3 18.5 2.1 13.1 1.6 50.0 15.3 5.8 24.1 0.8 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.2 0.1 2.1 0.2 0.8 0.6 8.3 2.5 1.8 2.9 0.1 Avg Speed (mph)3 4 18 9 11 18 3 6 6 3 8 9 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.2 3.1 0.8 0.5 1.1 0.0 Fuel Eff. (mpg)12.1 12.5 26.6 21.4 24.1 31.4 10.1 16.2 18.8 11.3 21.8 30.1 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 5 0 5 0 17 5 1 7 0 CO Emissions (g)6 8 11 176 14 129 17 476 127 55 190 2 NOx Emissions (g)0 1 1 16 1 15 1 58 14 4 22 0 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 2 0 1 1 8 2 2 3 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.3 Total Del/Veh (s)25.6 Travel Dist (mi)134.3 Travel Time (hr)19.7 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)7.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.5 HC Emissions (g)42 CO Emissions (g)1210 NOx Emissions (g)135 Density (ft/veh)205 Occupancy (veh)20 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)21.7 10.4 2.0 2.2 11.6 1.8 2.1 Travel Dist (mi)0.5 0.6 56.6 0.7 4.7 284.5 347.7 Travel Time (hr)0.1 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.2 9.9 12.8 Avg Speed (mph)9 13 22 17 25 29 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.1 8.1 11.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)25.4 30.3 16.3 19.4 34.0 35.2 29.5 HC Emissions (g)0 0 44 0 1 77 122 CO Emissions (g)2 2 1486 11 14 1401 2916 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 182 1 2 212 397 Density (ft/veh)712 Occupancy (veh)0 0 3 0 0 10 13 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 235 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year PM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 08 HY PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 Total Del/Veh (s)36.2 9.9 11.2 1.4 7.4 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 790.1 40.9 33.4 864.7 Travel Time (hr)0.1 30.1 1.6 1.4 33.2 Avg Speed (mph)6 26 25 23 26 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 22.9 1.2 1.9 25.9 Fuel Eff. (mpg)19.8 34.5 34.5 18.0 33.3 HC Emissions (g)0 221 14 23 259 CO Emissions (g)2 4297 269 822 5389 NOx Emissions (g)0 625 40 90 756 Density (ft/veh)239 Occupancy (veh)0 30 2 1 33 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)35.3 Travel Dist (mi)2324.3 Travel Time (hr)101.3 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)74.5 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.2 HC Emissions (g)731 CO Emissions (g)15776 NOx Emissions (g)2128 Density (ft/veh)208 Occupancy (veh)101 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 236 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year PM Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 09/15/2022 08 HY PM Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)65 20 149 168 191 255 269 157 182 184 Average Queue (ft)24 1 73 54 38 220 234 79 87 92 95th Queue (ft)58 13 132 119 118 285 282 137 153 154 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)11 17 0 0 Queuing Penalty (veh)65 102 0 0 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 27 0 10 1 0 32 8 6 Queuing Penalty (veh) 7 0 9 1 0 10 18 6 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB SB Directions Served LR TR L Maximum Queue (ft)44 5 35 Average Queue (ft)12 0 4 95th Queue (ft)38 4 22 Link Distance (ft)453 228 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB Directions Served R T TR Maximum Queue (ft)40 246 304 Average Queue (ft)5 75 117 95th Queue (ft)25 201 267 Link Distance (ft)469 3422 3422 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 218 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 237 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 09 HY SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 1 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Denied Del/Veh (s)0.2 0.2 4.1 3.7 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Del/Veh (s)37.2 35.2 1.6 39.2 36.8 15.1 57.4 30.7 24.9 52.3 23.9 20.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.8 1.1 1.9 27.1 4.2 20.8 2.1 35.2 7.7 6.4 34.5 1.9 Travel Time (hr)0.2 0.3 0.2 2.8 0.4 1.3 0.7 6.7 1.4 2.0 5.4 0.3 Avg Speed (mph)4 4 17 10 11 16 3 5 6 3 6 7 Fuel Used (gal)0.1 0.1 0.1 1.2 0.2 0.7 0.2 2.3 0.4 0.6 1.9 0.1 Fuel Eff. (mpg)13.5 13.3 26.6 22.3 24.7 30.3 10.5 15.6 18.7 11.1 17.9 21.6 HC Emissions (g)0 0 0 8 1 6 0 12 2 2 11 0 CO Emissions (g)7 10 16 253 29 174 21 343 52 67 309 7 NOx Emissions (g)1 1 1 23 2 19 2 39 5 6 37 1 Density (ft/veh) Occupancy (veh)0 0 0 3 0 1 1 7 1 2 5 0 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Performance by movement Movement All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.4 Total Del/Veh (s)29.1 Travel Dist (mi)143.8 Travel Time (hr)21.7 Avg Speed (mph)7 Fuel Used (gal)7.8 Fuel Eff. (mpg)18.5 HC Emissions (g)43 CO Emissions (g)1289 NOx Emissions (g)137 Density (ft/veh)187 Occupancy (veh)21 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Performance by movement Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)18.0 7.3 1.9 1.8 8.4 2.6 2.4 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 0.9 43.6 0.3 4.2 398.1 447.5 Travel Time (hr)0.0 0.1 2.0 0.0 0.2 14.0 16.3 Avg Speed (mph)9 14 22 17 25 28 28 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.1 11.2 14.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)26.3 33.4 15.5 19.8 34.9 35.4 31.4 HC Emissions (g)0 0 36 0 1 112 148 CO Emissions (g)1 2 1262 6 13 2077 3362 NOx Emissions (g)0 0 148 1 2 307 457 Density (ft/veh)558 Occupancy (veh)0 0 2 0 0 14 16 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 238 of 356 SimTraffic Performance Report Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 09 HY SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 2 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Performance by movement Movement WBR NBT NBR SBT All Denied Del/Veh (s)0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 Total Del/Veh (s)10.0 4.2 4.1 1.8 3.0 Travel Dist (mi)0.4 529.0 14.6 48.1 592.1 Travel Time (hr)0.0 18.8 0.5 2.2 21.6 Avg Speed (mph)13 28 27 22 27 Fuel Used (gal)0.0 14.9 0.4 2.9 18.2 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.6 35.5 36.3 16.5 32.5 HC Emissions (g)0 144 2 34 179 CO Emissions (g)1 2633 45 1222 3902 NOx Emissions (g)0 400 6 142 548 Density (ft/veh)368 Occupancy (veh)0 19 1 2 22 Total Network Performance Denied Del/Veh (s)0.5 Total Del/Veh (s)35.8 Travel Dist (mi)2192.6 Travel Time (hr)96.3 Avg Speed (mph)23 Fuel Used (gal)70.3 Fuel Eff. (mpg)31.2 HC Emissions (g)679 CO Emissions (g)14537 NOx Emissions (g)1969 Density (ft/veh)219 Occupancy (veh)96 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 239 of 356 Queuing and Blocking Report Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr - 4-Lane Alt 08/29/2022 09 HY SAT Calrsbad Blvd/Tamarack Avenue Mobility Analysis SimTraffic Report Wood Rodgers, Inc.Page 3 Intersection: 1: Carlsbad Blvd & Beach Parking /Tamarack Ave Movement EB EB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LT R L TR L T TR L T TR Maximum Queue (ft)84 51 174 183 193 250 257 182 236 243 Average Queue (ft)29 3 93 72 46 183 198 93 147 154 95th Queue (ft)68 23 157 137 132 263 273 168 223 233 Link Distance (ft)273 929 233 233 228 228 Upstream Blk Time (%)2 5 1 1 Queuing Penalty (veh)10 19 3 4 Storage Bay Dist (ft)30 93 115 97 Storage Blk Time (%) 26 0 16 5 0 27 11 20 Queuing Penalty (veh) 11 0 22 8 0 10 33 25 Intersection: 2: Carlsbad Blvd & Redwood Ave Movement WB NB SB SB SB Directions Served LR TR L T T Maximum Queue (ft)46 2 35 55 66 Average Queue (ft)13 0 4 2 3 95th Queue (ft)39 2 20 27 32 Link Distance (ft)453 228 2676 2676 Upstream Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Storage Bay Dist (ft)95 Storage Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Intersection: 3: Carlsbad Blvd & Sequoia Ave Movement WB NB NB SB Directions Served R T TR T Maximum Queue (ft)30 118 132 28 Average Queue (ft)4 12 22 1 95th Queue (ft)22 64 84 28 Link Distance (ft)469 3422 3422 233 Upstream Blk Time (%)0 Queuing Penalty (veh)0 Storage Bay Dist (ft) Storage Blk Time (%) Queuing Penalty (veh) Network Summary Network wide Queuing Penalty: 145 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 240 of 356 ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS Site: 101 [Exist AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Roundabout Basic Parameters Central Island Diam Circ Width Insc Diam Entry Radius Entry Angle Circ Lanes Entry Lanes Av.Entry Lane Width App. Dist Prop Queued Upstr Signal Extra BunchingLocationName ft ft ft ft °ft ft % South Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 52.0*42.0*1 1 15.00*3773.0 NA5 0.0 East Tamarack Ave 70.00*17.00*104.0* 50.0*12.0*1 1 16.00*985.0 NA5 0.0 North Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 40.0*26.0*1 1 14.00*3003.0 NA5 0.0 West Beach Parking 70.00*17.00*104.0* 46.0*39.0*1 218 18.00*349.0 NA5 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 5 Not Applicable (single Site analysis or unconnected Site in Network analysis). * These parameters do not affect estimated capacity values in the HCM 6 Capacity Model. 18 Exclusive slip/bypass lane is included in Entry Lanes count. Roundabout Entry and Circulating / Exiting Stream Parameters Critical GapTo Approach Turn Lane No Lane Type Opng Flow Opng Flow In- Bunch Hdwy Prop. Bunched Cap Const Effect Priority Sharing OD Factor HVE for Entry Follow- up Hdwy [ Hdwy Dist ] veh/h pcu/h sec sec ft sec South: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High West L2 1 Dominant 59 60 0.00 0.000 No No 0.989 1.00 4.35 93.5 2.28 North T1 1 Dominant 59 60 0.00 0.000 No No 0.989 1.02 4.35 93.5 2.28 East R2 1 Dominant 59 60 0.00 0.000 No No 0.989 1.02 4.35 93.5 2.28 East: Tamarack Ave Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High South L2 1 Dominant 254 249 0.00 0.000 No No 0.991 1.02 4.90 149.3 2.57 West T1 1 Dominant 254 249 0.00 0.000 No No 0.991 1.00 4.90 149.3 2.57 North R2 1 Dominant 254 249 0.00 0.000 No No 0.991 1.02 4.90 149.3 2.57 North: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High East L2 1 Dominant 282 278 0.00 0.000 No No 0.974 1.02 4.80 103.6 2.52 South T1 1 Dominant 282 278 0.00 0.000 No No 0.974 1.02 4.80 103.6 2.52 West R2 1 Dominant 282 278 0.00 0.000 No No 0.974 1.00 4.80 103.6 2.52 West: Beach Parking Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High North L2 1 Dominant 707 708 0.00 0.000 No No 0.922 1.00 4.54 122.5 2.54 East T1 1 Dominant 707 708 0.00 0.000 No No 0.922 1.00 4.54 122.5 2.54 South R2 2 Excl. Slip 661 661 0.00 0.000 No No 0.932 1.00 4.54 124.7 2.54 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Circulating Lane Flow Rates Circulating Flow RateCirc. Lane No July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 241 of 356 veh/h pcu/h Percent South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 59 60 100.0 Approach 59 60 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1 254 249 100.0 Approach 254 249 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 282 278 100.0 Approach 282 278 West: Beach Parking Lane 1 707 708 100.0 Approach 707 708 Roundabout Capacity Model: The US HCM 6 roundabout capacity model option is in use. This model considers only the total circulating flow and not the flow rates in individual circulating lanes. To model the effects of flow distribution in circulating lanes on the entry capacity results, you should use the SIDRA Standard roundabout capacity model. Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Lanes) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum DelayOpposed Lane Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.23 0.84 9.39 0.918 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 10.22 2.50 7.72 0.755 0.0 North: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.23 2.82 7.41 0.724 0.0 West: Beach Parking 1 5.17 2.75 2.42 0.468 0.0 2 10.40 9.13 1.28 0.123 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Movements) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum Delay To Approach Turn Opsd Lane No Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd West L2 1 10.23 0.84 9.39 0.918 0.0 North T1 1 10.23 0.84 9.39 0.918 0.0 East R2 1 10.23 0.84 9.39 0.918 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave South L2 1 10.22 2.50 7.72 0.755 0.0 West T1 1 10.22 2.50 7.72 0.755 0.0 North R2 1 10.22 2.50 7.72 0.755 0.0 North: Carlsbad Blvd East L2 1 10.23 2.82 7.41 0.724 0.0 South T1 1 10.23 2.82 7.41 0.724 0.0 West R2 1 10.23 2.82 7.41 0.724 0.0 West: Beach Parking North L2 1 5.17 2.75 2.42 0.468 0.0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 242 of 356 East T1 1 5.17 2.75 2.42 0.468 0.0 South R2 2 10.40 9.13 1.28 0.123 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:55:49AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 243 of 356 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [Exist AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Thursday, September 1, 2022 11:06:07 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 244 of 356 INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: 101 [Exist AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Intersection Performance -Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Travel Speed (Average)36.0 mph 36.0 mph Travel Distance (Total)1283.7 veh-mi/h 1527.4 pers-mi/h Travel Time (Total)35.7 veh-h/h 42.5 pers-h/h Desired Speed (Program)38.1 mph Speed Efficiency 0.94 Travel Time Index 9.39 Congestion Coefficient 1.06 Demand Flows (Total)1177 veh/h 1400 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand)1.8 % Degree of Saturation 0.477 Practical Spare Capacity 78.3 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2469 veh/h Control Delay (Total)1.26 veh-h/h 1.50 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)3.9 sec 3.9 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)8.5 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)8.5 sec 8.5 sec Geometric Delay (Average)0.0 sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)3.9 sec Idling Time (Average)0.6 sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS A 95% Back of Queue -Vehicles (Worst Lane)1.8 veh 95% Back of Queue -Distance (Worst Lane)43.6 ft Ave. Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane)0.01 Total Effective Stops 429 veh/h 511 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.36 0.37 Proportion Queued 0.38 0.38 Performance Index 45.8 45.8 Cost (Total)691.11 $/h 691.11 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)39.8 gal/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)339.0 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.029 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)0.456 kg/h NOx (Total)0.386 kg/h Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Site Model Variability Index (Iterations 3 to N): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 2 (Maximum: 10) Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance -Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)564,960 veh/y 671,906 pers/y Delay 606 veh-h/y 721 pers-h/y Effective Stops 206,115 veh/y 245,444 pers/y Travel Distance 616,197 veh-mi/y 733,147 pers-mi/y Travel Time 17,134 veh-h/y 20,385 pers-h/y July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 245 of 356 Cost 331,731 $/y 331,731 $/y Fuel Consumption 19,120 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 162,733 kg/y Hydrocarbons 14 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 219 kg/y NOx 185 kg/y SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:55:49AMProject: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 246 of 356 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Exist AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: Carlsbad Blvd 3 L2 15 0.0 15 0.0 0.224 1.8 LOS A 0.3 6.9 0.14 0.11 0.14 25.6 8 T1 233 2.0 233 2.0 0.224 1.8 LOS A 0.3 6.9 0.14 0.11 0.14 37.0 18 R2 76 2.0 76 2.0 0.224 1.8 LOS A 0.3 6.9 0.14 0.11 0.14 35.7 Approach 324 1.9 324 1.9 0.224 0.8 LOS A 0.3 6.9 0.14 0.11 0.14 36.3 East: Tamarack Ave 1 L2 231 2.0 231 2.0 0.321 3.2 LOS A 0.9 22.8 0.39 0.37 0.39 35.4 6 T1 36 0.0 36 0.0 0.321 3.2 LOS A 0.9 22.8 0.39 0.37 0.39 28.6 16 R2 72 2.0 72 2.0 0.321 3.2 LOS A 0.9 22.8 0.39 0.37 0.39 34.2 Approach 339 1.8 339 1.8 0.321 2.0 LOS A 0.9 22.8 0.39 0.37 0.39 34.9 North: Carlsbad Blvd 7 L2 46 2.0 46 2.0 0.477 5.5 LOS A 1.8 43.6 0.51 0.50 0.51 35.1 4 T1 430 2.0 430 2.0 0.477 5.5 LOS A 1.8 43.6 0.51 0.50 0.51 36.6 14 R2 18 0.0 18 0.0 0.477 5.5 LOS A 1.8 43.6 0.51 0.50 0.51 29.9 Approach 494 1.9 494 1.9 0.477 3.7 LOS A 1.8 43.6 0.51 0.50 0.51 36.4 West: Beach Parking 5 L2 6 0.0 6 0.0 0.078 6.6 LOS A 0.2 4.5 0.92 0.92 0.92 32.8 2 T1 7 0.0 7 0.0 0.078 6.6 LOS A 0.2 4.5 0.92 0.92 0.92 26.3 12 R2 7 0.0 7 0.0 0.040 8.5 LOS A 0.1 1.3 0.88 0.88 0.88 34.8 Approach 20 0.0 20 0.0 0.078 7.3 LOS A 0.2 4.5 0.90 0.90 0.90 32.3 All Vehicles 1177 1.8 1177 1.8 0.477 3.9 LOS A 1.8 43.6 0.38 0.36 0.38 36.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:55:49AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 247 of 356 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Exist AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Lane Use and Performance DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUECap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Aver. Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block. [ Total HV ][ Veh Dist ] veh/h %veh/h v/c %sec ft ft %% South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 324 1.9 1448 0.224 100 0.8 LOS A 0.3 6.9 Full 3773 0.0 0.0 Approach 324 1.9 0.224 0.8 LOS A 0.3 6.9 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1d 339 1.8 1058 0.321 100 2.0 LOS A 0.9 22.8 Full 985 0.0 0.0 Approach 339 1.8 0.321 2.0 LOS A 0.9 22.8 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 494 1.9 1036 0.477 100 3.7 LOS A 1.8 43.6 Full 3003 0.0 0.0 Approach 494 1.9 0.477 3.7 LOS A 1.8 43.6 West: Beach Parking Lane 1d 13 0.0 166 0.078 100 6.6 LOS A 0.2 4.5 Full 349 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 7 0.0 174 0.040 100 8.5 LOS A 0.1 1.3 Short 60 0.0 NA Approach 20 0.0 0.078 7.3 LOS A 0.2 4.5 Intersection 1177 1.8 0.477 3.9 LOS A 1.8 43.6 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach Approach Lane Flows (veh/h) South: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From S To Exit:W N E Lane 1 15 233 76 324 1.9 1448 0.224 100 NA NA Approach 15 233 76 324 1.9 0.224 East: Tamarack Ave Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From E To Exit:S W N Lane 1 231 36 72 339 1.8 1058 0.321 100 NA NA July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 248 of 356 Approach 231 36 72 339 1.8 0.321 North: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From N To Exit:E S W Lane 1 46 430 18 494 1.9 1036 0.477 100 NA NA Approach 46 430 18 494 1.9 0.477 West: Beach Parking Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From W To Exit:N E S Lane 1 6 7 -13 0.0 166 0.078 100 NA NA Lane 2 --7 7 0.0 174 0.040 100 0.0 1 Approach 6 7 7 20 0.0 0.078 Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c) Intersection 1177 1.8 0.477 Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable. Merge Analysis Exit Lane Number Short Lane Length Percent Opng in Lane Opposing Flow Rate Critical Gap Follow-up Headway Lane Flow Rate Capacity Deg. Satn Min. Delay Merge Delay ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec South Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. East Exit: Tamarack Ave Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. North Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. West Exit: Beach Parking Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:55:49AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 249 of 356 ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS Site: 101 [Exist PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Roundabout Basic Parameters Central Island Diam Circ Width Insc Diam Entry Radius Entry Angle Circ Lanes Entry Lanes Av.Entry Lane Width App. Dist Prop Queued Upstr Signal Extra BunchingLocationName ft ft ft ft °ft ft % South Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 52.0*42.0*1 1 15.00*3773.0 NA5 0.0 East Tamarack Ave 70.00*17.00*104.0* 50.0*12.0*1 1 16.00*985.0 NA5 0.0 North Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 40.0*26.0*1 1 14.00*3003.0 NA5 0.0 West Beach Parking 70.00*17.00*104.0* 46.0*39.0*1 218 18.00*349.0 NA5 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 5 Not Applicable (single Site analysis or unconnected Site in Network analysis). * These parameters do not affect estimated capacity values in the HCM 6 Capacity Model. 18 Exclusive slip/bypass lane is included in Entry Lanes count. Roundabout Entry and Circulating / Exiting Stream Parameters Critical GapTo Approach Turn Lane No Lane Type Opng Flow Opng Flow In- Bunch Hdwy Prop. Bunched Cap Const Effect Priority Sharing OD Factor HVE for Entry Follow- up Hdwy [ Hdwy Dist ] veh/h pcu/h sec sec ft sec South: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High West L2 1 Dominant 130 131 0.00 0.000 No No 0.944 1.00 4.07 87.7 2.13 North T1 1 Dominant 130 131 0.00 0.000 No No 0.944 1.02 4.07 87.7 2.13 East R2 1 Dominant 130 131 0.00 0.000 No No 0.944 1.02 4.07 87.7 2.13 East: Tamarack Ave Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High South L2 1 Dominant 1031 1031 0.00 0.000 No No 0.757 1.02 4.98 153.5 2.61 West T1 1 Dominant 1031 1031 0.00 0.000 No No 0.757 1.00 4.98 153.5 2.61 North R2 1 Dominant 1031 1031 0.00 0.000 No No 0.757 1.02 4.98 153.5 2.61 North: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High East L2 1 Dominant 159 160 0.00 0.000 No No 0.968 1.02 4.50 95.5 2.36 South T1 1 Dominant 159 160 0.00 0.000 No No 0.968 1.02 4.50 95.5 2.36 West R2 1 Dominant 159 160 0.00 0.000 No No 0.968 1.00 4.50 95.5 2.36 West: Beach Parking Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High North L2 1 Dominant 715 701 0.00 0.000 No No 0.938 1.00 4.54 127.5 2.54 East T1 1 Dominant 715 701 0.00 0.000 No No 0.938 1.00 4.54 127.5 2.54 South R2 2 Excl. Slip 617 601 0.00 0.000 No No 0.953 1.00 4.54 133.3 2.54 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Circulating Lane Flow Rates Circulating Flow RateCirc. Lane No July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 250 of 356 veh/h pcu/h Percent South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 130 131 100.0 Approach 130 131 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1 1031 1031 100.0 Approach 1031 1031 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 159 160 100.0 Approach 159 160 West: Beach Parking Lane 1 715 701 100.0 Approach 715 701 Roundabout Capacity Model: The US HCM 6 roundabout capacity model option is in use. This model considers only the total circulating flow and not the flow rates in individual circulating lanes. To model the effects of flow distribution in circulating lanes on the entry capacity results, you should use the SIDRA Standard roundabout capacity model. Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Lanes) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum DelayOpposed Lane Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd 1 6.15 0.85 5.30 0.861 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 6.11 4.64 1.48 0.242 1.2 North: Carlsbad Blvd 1 6.15 1.14 5.02 0.815 0.0 West: Beach Parking 1 1.03 0.54 0.50 0.479 0.0 2 6.29 6.02 0.28 0.044 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Movements) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum Delay To Approach Turn Opsd Lane No Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd West L2 1 6.15 0.85 5.30 0.861 0.0 North T1 1 6.15 0.85 5.30 0.861 0.0 East R2 1 6.15 0.85 5.30 0.861 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave South L2 1 6.11 4.64 1.48 0.242 1.2 West T1 1 6.11 4.64 1.48 0.242 1.2 North R2 1 6.11 4.64 1.48 0.242 1.2 North: Carlsbad Blvd East L2 1 6.15 1.14 5.02 0.815 0.0 South T1 1 6.15 1.14 5.02 0.815 0.0 West R2 1 6.15 1.14 5.02 0.815 0.0 West: Beach Parking North L2 1 1.03 0.54 0.50 0.479 0.0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 251 of 356 East T1 1 1.03 0.54 0.50 0.479 0.0 South R2 2 6.29 6.02 0.28 0.044 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:34:55AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 252 of 356 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [Exist PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Thursday, September 1, 2022 11:08:11 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 253 of 356 INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: 101 [Exist PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Intersection Performance -Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Travel Speed (Average)32.6 mph 32.5 mph Travel Distance (Total)2571.1 veh-mi/h 3058.4 pers-mi/h Travel Time (Total)79.0 veh-h/h 94.0 pers-h/h Desired Speed (Program)38.0 mph Speed Efficiency 0.86 Travel Time Index 8.41 Congestion Coefficient 1.17 Demand Flows (Total)2232 veh/h 2657 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand)1.9 % Degree of Saturation 0.926 Practical Spare Capacity -8.2 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2410 veh/h Control Delay (Total)11.68 veh-h/h 13.93 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)18.8 sec 18.9 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)47.5 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)47.5 sec 47.5 sec Geometric Delay (Average)0.0 sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)18.8 sec Idling Time (Average)12.0 sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS B 95% Back of Queue -Vehicles (Worst Lane)4.7 veh 95% Back of Queue -Distance (Worst Lane)116.8 ft Ave. Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane)0.02 Total Effective Stops 1490 veh/h 1775 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.67 0.67 Proportion Queued 0.66 0.67 Performance Index 108.7 108.7 Cost (Total)1500.96 $/h 1500.96 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)82.4 gal/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)701.2 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.062 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)0.934 kg/h NOx (Total)0.785 kg/h Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Site Model Variability Index (Iterations 3 to N): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 2 (Maximum: 10) Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance -Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)1,071,360 veh/y 1,275,168 pers/y Delay 5,606 veh-h/y 6,684 pers-h/y Effective Stops 715,075 veh/y 852,210 pers/y Travel Distance 1,234,141 veh-mi/y 1,468,022 pers-mi/y Travel Time 37,913 veh-h/y 45,113 pers-h/y July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 254 of 356 Cost 720,459 $/y 720,459 $/y Fuel Consumption 39,534 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 336,563 kg/y Hydrocarbons 30 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 448 kg/y NOx 377 kg/y SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:34:55AMProject: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 255 of 356 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Exist PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: Carlsbad Blvd 3 L2 33 0.0 33 0.0 0.926 24.2 LOS C 4.7 116.8 0.77 0.77 0.77 22.1 8 T1 1016 2.0 1016 2.0 0.926 24.2 LOS C 4.7 116.8 0.77 0.77 0.77 32.7 18 R2 296 2.0 296 2.0 0.926 24.2 LOS C 4.7 116.8 0.77 0.77 0.77 30.1 Approach 1345 2.0 1345 2.0 0.926 19.9 LOS B 4.7 116.8 0.77 0.77 0.77 32.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 L2 112 2.0 112 2.0 0.626 20.8 LOS C 1.0 24.4 0.89 0.91 0.98 30.4 6 T1 15 0.0 15 0.0 0.626 20.8 LOS C 1.0 24.4 0.89 0.91 0.98 12.0 16 R2 82 2.0 82 2.0 0.626 20.8 LOS C 1.0 24.4 0.89 0.91 0.98 28.6 Approach 209 1.9 209 1.9 0.626 18.5 LOS B 1.0 24.4 0.89 0.91 0.98 28.7 North: Carlsbad Blvd 7 L2 98 2.0 98 2.0 0.497 5.3 LOS A 1.0 23.5 0.33 0.33 0.33 34.7 4 T1 505 2.0 505 2.0 0.497 5.3 LOS A 1.0 23.5 0.33 0.33 0.33 35.9 14 R2 15 0.0 15 0.0 0.497 5.3 LOS A 1.0 23.5 0.33 0.33 0.33 29.6 Approach 618 2.0 618 2.0 0.497 3.0 LOS A 1.0 23.5 0.33 0.33 0.33 35.7 West: Beach Parking 5 L2 16 0.0 16 0.0 0.565 16.0 LOS B 0.4 9.2 1.00 1.08 1.70 28.9 2 T1 16 0.0 16 0.0 0.565 16.0 LOS B 0.4 9.2 1.00 1.08 1.70 20.8 12 R2 28 0.0 28 0.0 0.450 47.5 LOS D 0.1 3.5 0.98 0.98 0.98 23.4 Approach 60 0.0 60 0.0 0.565 30.7 LOS C 0.4 9.2 0.99 1.03 1.36 24.3 All Vehicles 2232 1.9 2232 1.9 0.926 18.8 LOS B 4.7 116.8 0.66 0.67 0.68 32.6 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:34:55AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 256 of 356 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Exist PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Lane Use and Performance DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUECap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Aver. Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block. [ Total HV ][ Veh Dist ] veh/h %veh/h v/c %sec ft ft %% South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 1345 2.0 1452 0.926 100 19.9 LOS B 4.7 116.8 Full 3773 0.0 0.0 Approach 1345 2.0 0.926 19.9 LOS B 4.7 116.8 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1d 209 1.9 334 0.626 100 18.5 LOS B 1.0 24.4 Full 985 0.0 0.0 Approach 209 1.9 0.626 18.5 LOS B 1.0 24.4 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 618 2.0 1243 0.497 100 3.0 LOS A 1.0 23.5 Full 3003 0.0 0.0 Approach 618 2.0 0.497 3.0 LOS A 1.0 23.5 West: Beach Parking Lane 1d 32 0.0 57 0.565 100 16.0 LOS B 0.4 9.2 Full 349 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 28 0.0 62 0.450 100 47.5 LOS D 0.1 3.5 Short 60 0.0 NA Approach 60 0.0 0.565 30.7 LOS C 0.4 9.2 Intersection 2232 1.9 0.926 18.8 LOS B 4.7 116.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach Approach Lane Flows (veh/h) South: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From S To Exit:W N E Lane 1 33 1016 296 1345 2.0 1452 0.926 100 NA NA Approach 33 1016 296 1345 2.0 0.926 East: Tamarack Ave Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From E To Exit:S W N Lane 1 112 15 82 209 1.9 334 0.626 100 NA NA July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 257 of 356 Approach 112 15 82 209 1.9 0.626 North: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From N To Exit:E S W Lane 1 98 505 15 618 2.0 1243 0.497 100 NA NA Approach 98 505 15 618 2.0 0.497 West: Beach Parking Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From W To Exit:N E S Lane 1 16 16 -32 0.0 57 0.565 100 NA NA Lane 2 --28 28 0.0 62 0.450 100 0.0 1 Approach 16 16 28 60 0.0 0.565 Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c) Intersection 2232 1.9 0.926 Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable. Merge Analysis Exit Lane Number Short Lane Length Percent Opng in Lane Opposing Flow Rate Critical Gap Follow-up Headway Lane Flow Rate Capacity Deg. Satn Min. Delay Merge Delay ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec South Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. East Exit: Tamarack Ave Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. North Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. West Exit: Beach Parking Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:34:55AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 258 of 356 ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS Site: 101 [Exist SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Roundabout Basic Parameters Central Island Diam Circ Width Insc Diam Entry Radius Entry Angle Circ Lanes Entry Lanes Av.Entry Lane Width App. Dist Prop Queued Upstr Signal Extra BunchingLocationName ft ft ft ft °ft ft % South Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 52.0*42.0*1 1 15.00*3773.0 NA5 0.0 East Tamarack Ave 70.00*17.00*104.0* 50.0*12.0*1 1 16.00*985.0 NA5 0.0 North Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 40.0*26.0*1 1 14.00*3003.0 NA5 0.0 West Beach Parking 70.00*17.00*104.0* 46.0*39.0*1 218 18.00*349.0 NA5 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 5 Not Applicable (single Site analysis or unconnected Site in Network analysis). * These parameters do not affect estimated capacity values in the HCM 6 Capacity Model. 18 Exclusive slip/bypass lane is included in Entry Lanes count. Roundabout Entry and Circulating / Exiting Stream Parameters Critical GapTo Approach Turn Lane No Lane Type Opng Flow Opng Flow In- Bunch Hdwy Prop. Bunched Cap Const Effect Priority Sharing OD Factor HVE for Entry Follow- up Hdwy [ Hdwy Dist ] veh/h pcu/h sec sec ft sec South: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High West L2 1 Dominant 157 155 0.00 0.000 No No 0.966 1.00 4.28 93.9 2.24 North T1 1 Dominant 157 155 0.00 0.000 No No 0.966 1.02 4.28 93.9 2.24 East R2 1 Dominant 157 155 0.00 0.000 No No 0.966 1.02 4.28 93.9 2.24 East: Tamarack Ave Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High South L2 1 Dominant 817 783 0.00 0.000 No No 0.845 1.02 4.98 151.8 2.61 West T1 1 Dominant 817 783 0.00 0.000 No No 0.845 1.00 4.98 151.8 2.61 North R2 1 Dominant 817 783 0.00 0.000 No No 0.845 1.02 4.98 151.8 2.61 North: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High East L2 1 Dominant 253 243 0.00 0.000 No No 0.958 1.02 4.53 97.3 2.37 South T1 1 Dominant 253 243 0.00 0.000 No No 0.958 1.02 4.53 97.3 2.37 West R2 1 Dominant 253 243 0.00 0.000 No No 0.958 1.00 4.53 97.3 2.37 West: Beach Parking Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High North L2 1 Dominant 1017 975 0.00 0.000 No No 0.768 1.00 4.54 127.8 2.54 East T1 1 Dominant 1017 975 0.00 0.000 No No 0.768 1.00 4.54 127.8 2.54 South R2 2 Excl. Slip 904 863 0.00 0.000 No No 0.809 1.00 4.54 132.4 2.54 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Circulating Lane Flow Rates Circulating Flow RateCirc. Lane No July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 259 of 356 veh/h pcu/h Percent South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 157 155 100.0 Approach 157 155 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1 817 783 100.0 Approach 817 783 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 253 243 100.0 Approach 253 243 West: Beach Parking Lane 1 1017 975 100.0 Approach 1017 975 Roundabout Capacity Model: The US HCM 6 roundabout capacity model option is in use. This model considers only the total circulating flow and not the flow rates in individual circulating lanes. To model the effects of flow distribution in circulating lanes on the entry capacity results, you should use the SIDRA Standard roundabout capacity model. Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Lanes) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum DelayOpposed Lane Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.32 1.85 8.48 0.821 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 10.28 6.46 3.81 0.371 2.4 North: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.32 2.68 7.64 0.741 0.0 West: Beach Parking 1 5.00 3.42 1.58 0.316 0.0 2 10.03 9.11 0.92 0.092 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Movements) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum Delay To Approach Turn Opsd Lane No Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd West L2 1 10.32 1.85 8.48 0.821 0.0 North T1 1 10.32 1.85 8.48 0.821 0.0 East R2 1 10.32 1.85 8.48 0.821 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave South L2 1 10.28 6.46 3.81 0.371 2.4 West T1 1 10.28 6.46 3.81 0.371 2.4 North R2 1 10.28 6.46 3.81 0.371 2.4 North: Carlsbad Blvd East L2 1 10.32 2.68 7.64 0.741 0.0 South T1 1 10.32 2.68 7.64 0.741 0.0 West R2 1 10.32 2.68 7.64 0.741 0.0 West: Beach Parking North L2 1 5.00 3.42 1.58 0.316 0.0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 260 of 356 East T1 1 5.00 3.42 1.58 0.316 0.0 South R2 2 10.03 9.11 0.92 0.092 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:56:24AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 261 of 356 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [Exist SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Thursday, September 1, 2022 11:09:39 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 262 of 356 INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: 101 [Exist SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Intersection Performance -Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Travel Speed (Average)32.9 mph 32.9 mph Travel Distance (Total)2540.3 veh-mi/h 2989.1 pers-mi/h Travel Time (Total)77.2 veh-h/h 90.8 pers-h/h Desired Speed (Program)35.8 mph Speed Efficiency 0.92 Travel Time Index 9.10 Congestion Coefficient 1.09 Demand Flows (Total)2252 veh/h 2652 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand)1.8 % Degree of Saturation 0.782 Practical Spare Capacity 8.7 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2880 veh/h Control Delay (Total)8.28 veh-h/h 9.75 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)13.2 sec 13.2 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)21.4 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)21.4 sec 21.4 sec Geometric Delay (Average)0.0 sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)13.2 sec Idling Time (Average)6.7 sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS B 95% Back of Queue -Vehicles (Worst Lane)4.6 veh 95% Back of Queue -Distance (Worst Lane)108.5 ft Ave. Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane)0.03 Total Effective Stops 1582 veh/h 1864 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.70 0.70 Proportion Queued 0.71 0.71 Performance Index 125.4 125.4 Cost (Total)1398.33 $/h 1398.33 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)74.2 gal/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)590.7 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.053 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)0.785 kg/h NOx (Total)0.744 kg/h Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Site Model Variability Index (Iterations 3 to N): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 2 (Maximum: 10) Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance -Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)1,080,960 veh/y 1,273,152 pers/y Delay 3,974 veh-h/y 4,681 pers-h/y Effective Stops 759,599 veh/y 894,890 pers/y Travel Distance 1,219,333 veh-mi/y 1,434,751 pers-mi/y Travel Time 37,045 veh-h/y 43,599 pers-h/y July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 263 of 356 Cost 671,199 $/y 671,199 $/y Fuel Consumption 35,614 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 283,533 kg/y Hydrocarbons 25 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 377 kg/y NOx 357 kg/y SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:56:24AMProject: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 264 of 356 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Exist SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: Carlsbad Blvd 3 L2 43 0.0 43 0.0 0.721 10.3 LOS B 3.6 84.1 0.58 0.55 0.58 24.0 8 T1 755 2.0 755 2.0 0.721 10.3 LOS B 3.6 84.1 0.58 0.55 0.58 34.6 18 R2 152 2.0 152 2.0 0.721 10.3 LOS B 3.6 84.1 0.58 0.55 0.58 33.0 Approach 950 1.9 950 1.9 0.721 7.1 LOS A 3.6 84.1 0.58 0.55 0.58 34.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 L2 180 2.0 180 2.0 0.656 18.1 LOS B 2.8 66.4 0.83 0.91 1.11 30.0 6 T1 30 0.0 30 0.0 0.656 18.1 LOS B 2.8 66.4 0.83 0.91 1.11 20.4 16 R2 126 2.0 126 2.0 0.656 18.1 LOS B 2.8 66.4 0.83 0.91 1.11 28.9 Approach 336 1.8 336 1.8 0.656 16.3 LOS B 2.8 66.4 0.83 0.91 1.11 29.2 North: Carlsbad Blvd 7 L2 113 2.0 113 2.0 0.782 14.3 LOS B 4.6 108.5 0.77 0.77 0.77 31.2 4 T1 724 2.0 724 2.0 0.782 14.3 LOS B 4.6 108.5 0.77 0.77 0.77 33.4 14 R2 41 0.0 41 0.0 0.782 14.3 LOS B 4.6 108.5 0.77 0.77 0.77 29.7 Approach 878 1.9 878 1.9 0.782 11.2 LOS B 4.6 108.5 0.77 0.77 0.77 33.1 West: Beach Parking 5 L2 19 0.0 19 0.0 0.392 9.2 LOS A 1.1 27.6 0.99 1.00 1.04 31.2 2 T1 25 0.0 25 0.0 0.392 9.2 LOS A 1.1 27.6 0.99 1.00 1.04 24.5 12 R2 44 0.0 44 0.0 0.337 21.4 LOS C 0.3 8.4 0.94 0.94 0.94 29.8 Approach 88 0.0 88 0.0 0.392 15.3 LOS B 1.1 27.6 0.96 0.97 0.99 29.3 All Vehicles 2252 1.8 2252 1.8 0.782 13.2 LOS B 4.6 108.5 0.71 0.70 0.75 32.9 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:56:24AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 265 of 356 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Exist SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Lane Use and Performance DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUECap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Aver. Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block. [ Total HV ][ Veh Dist ] veh/h %veh/h v/c %sec ft ft %% South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 950 1.9 1317 0.721 100 7.1 LOS A 3.6 84.1 Full 3773 0.0 0.0 Approach 950 1.9 0.721 7.1 LOS A 3.6 84.1 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1d 336 1.8 512 0.656 100 16.3 LOS B 2.8 66.4 Full 985 0.0 0.0 Approach 336 1.8 0.656 16.3 LOS B 2.8 66.4 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 878 1.9 1123 0.782 100 11.2 LOS B 4.6 108.5 Full 3003 0.0 0.0 Approach 878 1.9 0.782 11.2 LOS B 4.6 108.5 West: Beach Parking Lane 1d 44 0.0 112 0.392 100 9.2 LOS A 1.1 27.6 Full 349 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 44 0.0 130 0.337 100 21.4 LOS C 0.3 8.4 Short 60 0.0 NA Approach 88 0.0 0.392 15.3 LOS B 1.1 27.6 Intersection 2252 1.8 0.782 13.2 LOS B 4.6 108.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach Approach Lane Flows (veh/h) South: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From S To Exit:W N E Lane 1 43 755 152 950 1.9 1317 0.721 100 NA NA Approach 43 755 152 950 1.9 0.721 East: Tamarack Ave Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From E To Exit:S W N Lane 1 180 30 126 336 1.8 512 0.656 100 NA NA July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 266 of 356 Approach 180 30 126 336 1.8 0.656 North: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From N To Exit:E S W Lane 1 113 724 41 878 1.9 1123 0.782 100 NA NA Approach 113 724 41 878 1.9 0.782 West: Beach Parking Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From W To Exit:N E S Lane 1 19 25 -44 0.0 112 0.392 100 NA NA Lane 2 --44 44 0.0 130 0.337 100 0.0 1 Approach 19 25 44 88 0.0 0.392 Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c) Intersection 2252 1.8 0.782 Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable. Merge Analysis Exit Lane Number Short Lane Length Percent Opng in Lane Opposing Flow Rate Critical Gap Follow-up Headway Lane Flow Rate Capacity Deg. Satn Min. Delay Merge Delay ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec South Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. East Exit: Tamarack Ave Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. North Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. West Exit: Beach Parking Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:56:24AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 267 of 356 ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS Site: 101 [Cumulative AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Roundabout Basic Parameters Central Island Diam Circ Width Insc Diam Entry Radius Entry Angle Circ Lanes Entry Lanes Av.Entry Lane Width App. Dist Prop Queued Upstr Signal Extra BunchingLocationName ft ft ft ft °ft ft % South Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 52.0*42.0*1 1 15.00*3773.0 NA5 0.0 East Tamarack Ave 70.00*17.00*104.0* 50.0*12.0*1 1 16.00*985.0 NA5 0.0 North Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 40.0*26.0*1 1 14.00*3003.0 NA5 0.0 West Beach Parking 70.00*17.00*104.0* 46.0*39.0*1 218 18.00*349.0 NA5 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 5 Not Applicable (single Site analysis or unconnected Site in Network analysis). * These parameters do not affect estimated capacity values in the HCM 6 Capacity Model. 18 Exclusive slip/bypass lane is included in Entry Lanes count. Roundabout Entry and Circulating / Exiting Stream Parameters Critical GapTo Approach Turn Lane No Lane Type Opng Flow Opng Flow In- Bunch Hdwy Prop. Bunched Cap Const Effect Priority Sharing OD Factor HVE for Entry Follow- up Hdwy [ Hdwy Dist ] veh/h pcu/h sec sec ft sec South: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High West L2 1 Dominant 61 62 0.00 0.000 No No 0.989 1.00 4.36 93.4 2.28 North T1 1 Dominant 61 62 0.00 0.000 No No 0.989 1.02 4.36 93.4 2.28 East R2 1 Dominant 61 62 0.00 0.000 No No 0.989 1.02 4.36 93.4 2.28 East: Tamarack Ave Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High South L2 1 Dominant 260 255 0.00 0.000 No No 0.991 1.02 4.91 149.4 2.57 West T1 1 Dominant 260 255 0.00 0.000 No No 0.991 1.00 4.91 149.4 2.57 North R2 1 Dominant 260 255 0.00 0.000 No No 0.991 1.02 4.91 149.4 2.57 North: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High East L2 1 Dominant 285 281 0.00 0.000 No No 0.973 1.02 4.80 103.4 2.51 South T1 1 Dominant 285 281 0.00 0.000 No No 0.973 1.02 4.80 103.4 2.51 West R2 1 Dominant 285 281 0.00 0.000 No No 0.973 1.00 4.80 103.4 2.51 West: Beach Parking Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High North L2 1 Dominant 721 722 0.00 0.000 No No 0.918 1.00 4.54 122.6 2.54 East T1 1 Dominant 721 722 0.00 0.000 No No 0.918 1.00 4.54 122.6 2.54 South R2 2 Excl. Slip 673 673 0.00 0.000 No No 0.929 1.00 4.54 124.8 2.54 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Circulating Lane Flow Rates Circulating Flow RateCirc. Lane No July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 268 of 356 veh/h pcu/h Percent South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 61 62 100.0 Approach 61 62 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1 260 255 100.0 Approach 260 255 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 285 281 100.0 Approach 285 281 West: Beach Parking Lane 1 721 722 100.0 Approach 721 722 Roundabout Capacity Model: The US HCM 6 roundabout capacity model option is in use. This model considers only the total circulating flow and not the flow rates in individual circulating lanes. To model the effects of flow distribution in circulating lanes on the entry capacity results, you should use the SIDRA Standard roundabout capacity model. Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Lanes) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum DelayOpposed Lane Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.23 0.86 9.37 0.916 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 10.22 2.55 7.66 0.750 0.0 North: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.23 2.85 7.38 0.722 0.0 West: Beach Parking 1 5.16 2.78 2.38 0.461 0.0 2 10.39 9.13 1.26 0.121 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Movements) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum Delay To Approach Turn Opsd Lane No Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd West L2 1 10.23 0.86 9.37 0.916 0.0 North T1 1 10.23 0.86 9.37 0.916 0.0 East R2 1 10.23 0.86 9.37 0.916 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave South L2 1 10.22 2.55 7.66 0.750 0.0 West T1 1 10.22 2.55 7.66 0.750 0.0 North R2 1 10.22 2.55 7.66 0.750 0.0 North: Carlsbad Blvd East L2 1 10.23 2.85 7.38 0.722 0.0 South T1 1 10.23 2.85 7.38 0.722 0.0 West R2 1 10.23 2.85 7.38 0.722 0.0 West: Beach Parking North L2 1 5.16 2.78 2.38 0.461 0.0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 269 of 356 East T1 1 5.16 2.78 2.38 0.461 0.0 South R2 2 10.39 9.13 1.26 0.121 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:57:26 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 270 of 356 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [Cumulative AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:57:30 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 271 of 356 INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: 101 [Cumulative AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Intersection Performance -Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Travel Speed (Average)35.9 mph 35.9 mph Travel Distance (Total)1311.6 veh-mi/h 1560.7 pers-mi/h Travel Time (Total)36.5 veh-h/h 43.4 pers-h/h Desired Speed (Program)38.1 mph Speed Efficiency 0.94 Travel Time Index 9.38 Congestion Coefficient 1.06 Demand Flows (Total)1202 veh/h 1430 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand)1.9 % Degree of Saturation 0.489 Practical Spare Capacity 73.9 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2460 veh/h Control Delay (Total)1.34 veh-h/h 1.59 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)4.0 sec 4.0 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)8.5 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)8.5 sec 8.5 sec Geometric Delay (Average)0.0 sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)4.0 sec Idling Time (Average)0.7 sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS A 95% Back of Queue -Vehicles (Worst Lane)1.8 veh 95% Back of Queue -Distance (Worst Lane)45.5 ft Ave. Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane)0.01 Total Effective Stops 450 veh/h 536 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.37 0.37 Proportion Queued 0.39 0.39 Performance Index 47.1 47.1 Cost (Total)706.92 $/h 706.92 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)40.8 gal/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)347.2 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.030 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)0.467 kg/h NOx (Total)0.395 kg/h Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Site Model Variability Index (Iterations 3 to N): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 2 (Maximum: 10) Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance -Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)576,960 veh/y 686,267 pers/y Delay 642 veh-h/y 764 pers-h/y Effective Stops 215,865 veh/y 257,072 pers/y Travel Distance 629,571 veh-mi/y 749,146 pers-mi/y Travel Time 17,515 veh-h/y 20,841 pers-h/y July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 272 of 356 Cost 339,322 $/y 339,322 $/y Fuel Consumption 19,569 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 166,663 kg/y Hydrocarbons 14 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 224 kg/y NOx 190 kg/y SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:57:26 AMProject: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 273 of 356 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Cumulative AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: Carlsbad Blvd 3 L2 15 0.0 15 0.0 0.229 1.9 LOS A 0.3 7.2 0.15 0.12 0.15 25.6 8 T1 239 2.0 239 2.0 0.229 1.9 LOS A 0.3 7.2 0.15 0.12 0.15 37.0 18 R2 77 2.0 77 2.0 0.229 1.9 LOS A 0.3 7.2 0.15 0.12 0.15 35.7 Approach 331 1.9 331 1.9 0.229 0.8 LOS A 0.3 7.2 0.15 0.12 0.15 36.3 East: Tamarack Ave 1 L2 234 2.0 234 2.0 0.329 3.3 LOS A 1.0 23.9 0.40 0.38 0.40 35.4 6 T1 36 0.0 36 0.0 0.329 3.3 LOS A 1.0 23.9 0.40 0.38 0.40 28.5 16 R2 76 2.0 76 2.0 0.329 3.3 LOS A 1.0 23.9 0.40 0.38 0.40 34.2 Approach 346 1.8 346 1.8 0.329 2.1 LOS A 1.0 23.9 0.40 0.38 0.40 34.9 North: Carlsbad Blvd 7 L2 48 2.0 48 2.0 0.489 5.7 LOS A 1.8 45.5 0.52 0.52 0.52 35.0 4 T1 439 2.0 439 2.0 0.489 5.7 LOS A 1.8 45.5 0.52 0.52 0.52 36.6 14 R2 18 0.0 18 0.0 0.489 5.7 LOS A 1.8 45.5 0.52 0.52 0.52 29.8 Approach 505 1.9 505 1.9 0.489 3.9 LOS A 1.8 45.5 0.52 0.52 0.52 36.3 West: Beach Parking 5 L2 6 0.0 6 0.0 0.079 6.7 LOS A 0.2 4.5 0.92 0.92 0.92 32.7 2 T1 7 0.0 7 0.0 0.079 6.7 LOS A 0.2 4.5 0.92 0.92 0.92 26.3 12 R2 7 0.0 7 0.0 0.041 8.5 LOS A 0.1 1.3 0.88 0.88 0.88 34.8 Approach 20 0.0 20 0.0 0.079 7.3 LOS A 0.2 4.5 0.91 0.91 0.91 32.3 All Vehicles 1202 1.9 1202 1.9 0.489 4.0 LOS A 1.8 45.5 0.39 0.37 0.39 35.9 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:57:26 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 274 of 356 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Cumulative AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Lane Use and Performance DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUECap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Aver. Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block. [ Total HV ][ Veh Dist ] veh/h %veh/h v/c %sec ft ft %% South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 331 1.9 1443 0.229 100 0.8 LOS A 0.3 7.2 Full 3773 0.0 0.0 Approach 331 1.9 0.229 0.8 LOS A 0.3 7.2 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1d 346 1.8 1050 0.329 100 2.1 LOS A 1.0 23.9 Full 985 0.0 0.0 Approach 346 1.8 0.329 2.1 LOS A 1.0 23.9 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 505 1.9 1033 0.489 100 3.9 LOS A 1.8 45.5 Full 3003 0.0 0.0 Approach 505 1.9 0.489 3.9 LOS A 1.8 45.5 West: Beach Parking Lane 1d 13 0.0 164 0.079 100 6.7 LOS A 0.2 4.5 Full 349 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 7 0.0 172 0.041 100 8.5 LOS A 0.1 1.3 Short 60 0.0 NA Approach 20 0.0 0.079 7.3 LOS A 0.2 4.5 Intersection 1202 1.9 0.489 4.0 LOS A 1.8 45.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach Approach Lane Flows (veh/h) South: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From S To Exit:W N E Lane 1 15 239 77 331 1.9 1443 0.229 100 NA NA Approach 15 239 77 331 1.9 0.229 East: Tamarack Ave Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From E To Exit:S W N Lane 1 234 36 76 346 1.8 1050 0.329 100 NA NA July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 275 of 356 Approach 234 36 76 346 1.8 0.329 North: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From N To Exit:E S W Lane 1 48 439 18 505 1.9 1033 0.489 100 NA NA Approach 48 439 18 505 1.9 0.489 West: Beach Parking Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From W To Exit:N E S Lane 1 6 7 -13 0.0 164 0.079 100 NA NA Lane 2 --7 7 0.0 172 0.041 100 0.0 1 Approach 6 7 7 20 0.0 0.079 Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c) Intersection 1202 1.9 0.489 Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable. Merge Analysis Exit Lane Number Short Lane Length Percent Opng in Lane Opposing Flow Rate Critical Gap Follow-up Headway Lane Flow Rate Capacity Deg. Satn Min. Delay Merge Delay ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec South Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. East Exit: Tamarack Ave Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. North Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. West Exit: Beach Parking Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:57:26 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 276 of 356 ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS Site: 101 [Cumulative PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Roundabout Basic Parameters Central Island Diam Circ Width Insc Diam Entry Radius Entry Angle Circ Lanes Entry Lanes Av.Entry Lane Width App. Dist Prop Queued Upstr Signal Extra BunchingLocationName ft ft ft ft °ft ft % South Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 52.0*42.0*1 1 15.00*3773.0 NA5 0.0 East Tamarack Ave 70.00*17.00*104.0* 50.0*12.0*1 1 16.00*985.0 NA5 0.0 North Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 40.0*26.0*1 1 14.00*3003.0 NA5 0.0 West Beach Parking 70.00*17.00*104.0* 46.0*39.0*1 218 18.00*349.0 NA5 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 5 Not Applicable (single Site analysis or unconnected Site in Network analysis). * These parameters do not affect estimated capacity values in the HCM 6 Capacity Model. 18 Exclusive slip/bypass lane is included in Entry Lanes count. Roundabout Entry and Circulating / Exiting Stream Parameters Critical GapTo Approach Turn Lane No Lane Type Opng Flow Opng Flow In- Bunch Hdwy Prop. Bunched Cap Const Effect Priority Sharing OD Factor HVE for Entry Follow- up Hdwy [ Hdwy Dist ] veh/h pcu/h sec sec ft sec South: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High West L2 1 Dominant 139 141 0.00 0.000 No No 0.944 1.00 4.10 87.9 2.15 North T1 1 Dominant 139 141 0.00 0.000 No No 0.944 1.02 4.10 87.9 2.15 East R2 1 Dominant 139 141 0.00 0.000 No No 0.944 1.02 4.10 87.9 2.15 East: Tamarack Ave Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High South L2 1 Dominant 1038 1038 0.00 0.000 No No 0.726 1.02 4.98 153.5 2.61 West T1 1 Dominant 1038 1038 0.00 0.000 No No 0.726 1.00 4.98 153.5 2.61 North R2 1 Dominant 1038 1038 0.00 0.000 No No 0.726 1.02 4.98 153.5 2.61 North: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High East L2 1 Dominant 162 163 0.00 0.000 No No 0.967 1.02 4.50 95.4 2.36 South T1 1 Dominant 162 163 0.00 0.000 No No 0.967 1.02 4.50 95.4 2.36 West R2 1 Dominant 162 163 0.00 0.000 No No 0.967 1.00 4.50 95.4 2.36 West: Beach Parking Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High North L2 1 Dominant 734 721 0.00 0.000 No No 0.933 1.00 4.54 127.1 2.54 East T1 1 Dominant 734 721 0.00 0.000 No No 0.933 1.00 4.54 127.1 2.54 South R2 2 Excl. Slip 627 612 0.00 0.000 No No 0.950 1.00 4.54 133.2 2.54 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Circulating Lane Flow Rates Circulating Flow RateCirc. Lane No July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 277 of 356 veh/h pcu/h Percent South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 139 141 100.0 Approach 139 141 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1 1038 1038 100.0 Approach 1038 1038 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 162 163 100.0 Approach 162 163 West: Beach Parking Lane 1 734 721 100.0 Approach 734 721 Roundabout Capacity Model: The US HCM 6 roundabout capacity model option is in use. This model considers only the total circulating flow and not the flow rates in individual circulating lanes. To model the effects of flow distribution in circulating lanes on the entry capacity results, you should use the SIDRA Standard roundabout capacity model. Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Lanes) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum DelayOpposed Lane Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd 1 6.15 0.90 5.25 0.853 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 6.11 4.73 1.38 0.226 0.9 North: Carlsbad Blvd 1 6.15 1.16 4.99 0.812 0.0 West: Beach Parking 1 1.03 0.55 0.48 0.469 0.0 2 6.29 6.01 0.27 0.043 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Movements) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum Delay To Approach Turn Opsd Lane No Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd West L2 1 6.15 0.90 5.25 0.853 0.0 North T1 1 6.15 0.90 5.25 0.853 0.0 East R2 1 6.15 0.90 5.25 0.853 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave South L2 1 6.11 4.73 1.38 0.226 0.9 West T1 1 6.11 4.73 1.38 0.226 0.9 North R2 1 6.11 4.73 1.38 0.226 0.9 North: Carlsbad Blvd East L2 1 6.15 1.16 4.99 0.812 0.0 South T1 1 6.15 1.16 4.99 0.812 0.0 West R2 1 6.15 1.16 4.99 0.812 0.0 West: Beach Parking North L2 1 1.03 0.55 0.48 0.469 0.0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 278 of 356 East T1 1 1.03 0.55 0.48 0.469 0.0 South R2 2 6.29 6.01 0.27 0.043 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:58:24 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 279 of 356 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [Cumulative PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:58:50 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 280 of 356 INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: 101 [Cumulative PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Intersection Performance -Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Travel Speed (Average)31.8 mph 31.8 mph Travel Distance (Total)2609.9 veh-mi/h 3104.9 pers-mi/h Travel Time (Total)82.1 veh-h/h 97.7 pers-h/h Desired Speed (Program)38.0 mph Speed Efficiency 0.84 Travel Time Index 8.17 Congestion Coefficient 1.20 Demand Flows (Total)2270 veh/h 2702 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand)1.9 % Degree of Saturation 0.951 Practical Spare Capacity -10.7 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2386 veh/h Control Delay (Total)13.85 veh-h/h 16.52 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)22.0 sec 22.0 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)48.5 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)48.5 sec 48.5 sec Geometric Delay (Average)0.0 sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)22.0 sec Idling Time (Average)14.7 sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS C 95% Back of Queue -Vehicles (Worst Lane)5.4 veh 95% Back of Queue -Distance (Worst Lane)134.2 ft Ave. Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane)0.02 Total Effective Stops 1660 veh/h 1979 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.73 0.73 Proportion Queued 0.73 0.73 Performance Index 115.3 115.3 Cost (Total)1556.14 $/h 1556.14 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)84.6 gal/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)720.9 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.064 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)0.956 kg/h NOx (Total)0.805 kg/h Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Site Model Variability Index (Iterations 3 to N): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 2 (Maximum: 10) Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance -Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)1,089,600 veh/y 1,297,051 pers/y Delay 6,649 veh-h/y 7,929 pers-h/y Effective Stops 797,028 veh/y 950,021 pers/y Travel Distance 1,252,775 veh-mi/y 1,490,375 pers-mi/y Travel Time 39,422 veh-h/y 46,917 pers-h/y July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 281 of 356 Cost 746,949 $/y 746,949 $/y Fuel Consumption 40,612 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 346,023 kg/y Hydrocarbons 31 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 459 kg/y NOx 387 kg/y SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:58:24 AMProject: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 282 of 356 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Cumulative PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: Carlsbad Blvd 3 L2 33 0.0 33 0.0 0.951 28.4 LOS C 5.4 134.2 0.87 0.87 0.87 21.4 8 T1 1024 2.0 1024 2.0 0.951 28.4 LOS C 5.4 134.2 0.87 0.87 0.87 31.8 18 R2 303 2.0 303 2.0 0.951 28.4 LOS C 5.4 134.2 0.87 0.87 0.87 29.0 Approach 1360 2.0 1360 2.0 0.951 24.0 LOS C 5.4 134.2 0.87 0.87 0.87 31.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 L2 115 2.0 115 2.0 0.691 26.6 LOS C 1.0 25.8 0.92 0.93 1.00 28.9 6 T1 15 0.0 15 0.0 0.691 26.6 LOS C 1.0 25.8 0.92 0.93 1.00 11.2 16 R2 86 2.0 86 2.0 0.691 26.6 LOS C 1.0 25.8 0.92 0.93 1.00 27.0 Approach 216 1.9 216 1.9 0.691 24.4 LOS C 1.0 25.8 0.92 0.93 1.00 27.2 North: Carlsbad Blvd 7 L2 107 2.0 107 2.0 0.512 5.6 LOS A 1.0 25.0 0.34 0.34 0.34 34.7 4 T1 512 2.0 512 2.0 0.512 5.6 LOS A 1.0 25.0 0.34 0.34 0.34 35.8 14 R2 15 0.0 15 0.0 0.512 5.6 LOS A 1.0 25.0 0.34 0.34 0.34 29.6 Approach 634 2.0 634 2.0 0.512 3.2 LOS A 1.0 25.0 0.34 0.34 0.34 35.6 West: Beach Parking 5 L2 16 0.0 16 0.0 0.577 17.5 LOS B 0.4 9.2 1.00 1.08 1.75 28.4 2 T1 16 0.0 16 0.0 0.577 17.5 LOS B 0.4 9.2 1.00 1.08 1.75 20.2 12 R2 28 0.0 28 0.0 0.455 48.5 LOS D 0.1 3.5 0.98 0.98 0.98 23.2 Approach 60 0.0 60 0.0 0.577 32.0 LOS C 0.4 9.2 0.99 1.03 1.39 24.0 All Vehicles 2270 1.9 2270 1.9 0.951 22.0 LOS C 5.4 134.2 0.73 0.73 0.75 31.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:58:24 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 283 of 356 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Cumulative PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Lane Use and Performance DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUECap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Aver. Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block. [ Total HV ][ Veh Dist ] veh/h %veh/h v/c %sec ft ft %% South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 1360 2.0 1429 0.951 100 24.0 LOS C 5.4 134.2 Full 3773 0.0 0.0 Approach 1360 2.0 0.951 24.0 LOS C 5.4 134.2 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1d 216 1.9 312 0.691 100 24.4 LOS C 1.0 25.8 Full 985 0.0 0.0 Approach 216 1.9 0.691 24.4 LOS C 1.0 25.8 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 634 2.0 1238 0.512 100 3.2 LOS A 1.0 25.0 Full 3003 0.0 0.0 Approach 634 2.0 0.512 3.2 LOS A 1.0 25.0 West: Beach Parking Lane 1d 32 0.0 56 0.577 100 17.5 LOS B 0.4 9.2 Full 349 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 28 0.0 61 0.455 100 48.5 LOS D 0.1 3.5 Short 60 0.0 NA Approach 60 0.0 0.577 32.0 LOS C 0.4 9.2 Intersection 2270 1.9 0.951 22.0 LOS C 5.4 134.2 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach Approach Lane Flows (veh/h) South: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From S To Exit:W N E Lane 1 33 1024 303 1360 2.0 1429 0.951 100 NA NA Approach 33 1024 303 1360 2.0 0.951 East: Tamarack Ave Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From E To Exit:S W N Lane 1 115 15 86 216 1.9 312 0.691 100 NA NA July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 284 of 356 Approach 115 15 86 216 1.9 0.691 North: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From N To Exit:E S W Lane 1 107 512 15 634 2.0 1238 0.512 100 NA NA Approach 107 512 15 634 2.0 0.512 West: Beach Parking Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From W To Exit:N E S Lane 1 16 16 -32 0.0 56 0.577 100 NA NA Lane 2 --28 28 0.0 61 0.455 100 0.0 1 Approach 16 16 28 60 0.0 0.577 Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c) Intersection 2270 1.9 0.951 Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable. Merge Analysis Exit Lane Number Short Lane Length Percent Opng in Lane Opposing Flow Rate Critical Gap Follow-up Headway Lane Flow Rate Capacity Deg. Satn Min. Delay Merge Delay ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec South Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. East Exit: Tamarack Ave Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. North Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. West Exit: Beach Parking Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:58:24 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 285 of 356 ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS Site: 101 [Cumulative SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Roundabout Basic Parameters Central Island Diam Circ Width Insc Diam Entry Radius Entry Angle Circ Lanes Entry Lanes Av.Entry Lane Width App. Dist Prop Queued Upstr Signal Extra BunchingLocationName ft ft ft ft °ft ft % South Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 52.0*42.0*1 1 15.00*3773.0 NA5 0.0 East Tamarack Ave 70.00*17.00*104.0* 50.0*12.0*1 1 16.00*985.0 NA5 0.0 North Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 40.0*26.0*1 1 14.00*3003.0 NA5 0.0 West Beach Parking 70.00*17.00*104.0* 46.0*39.0*1 218 18.00*349.0 NA5 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 5 Not Applicable (single Site analysis or unconnected Site in Network analysis). * These parameters do not affect estimated capacity values in the HCM 6 Capacity Model. 18 Exclusive slip/bypass lane is included in Entry Lanes count. Roundabout Entry and Circulating / Exiting Stream Parameters Critical GapTo Approach Turn Lane No Lane Type Opng Flow Opng Flow In- Bunch Hdwy Prop. Bunched Cap Const Effect Priority Sharing OD Factor HVE for Entry Follow- up Hdwy [ Hdwy Dist ] veh/h pcu/h sec sec ft sec South: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High West L2 1 Dominant 170 168 0.00 0.000 No No 0.964 1.00 4.31 94.0 2.26 North T1 1 Dominant 170 168 0.00 0.000 No No 0.964 1.02 4.31 94.0 2.26 East R2 1 Dominant 170 168 0.00 0.000 No No 0.964 1.02 4.31 94.0 2.26 East: Tamarack Ave Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High South L2 1 Dominant 829 795 0.00 0.000 No No 0.824 1.02 4.98 151.9 2.61 West T1 1 Dominant 829 795 0.00 0.000 No No 0.824 1.00 4.98 151.9 2.61 North R2 1 Dominant 829 795 0.00 0.000 No No 0.824 1.02 4.98 151.9 2.61 North: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High East L2 1 Dominant 261 251 0.00 0.000 No No 0.954 1.02 4.53 97.1 2.37 South T1 1 Dominant 261 251 0.00 0.000 No No 0.954 1.02 4.53 97.1 2.37 West R2 1 Dominant 261 251 0.00 0.000 No No 0.954 1.00 4.53 97.1 2.37 West: Beach Parking Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High North L2 1 Dominant 1054 1013 0.00 0.000 No No 0.738 1.00 4.54 127.3 2.54 East T1 1 Dominant 1054 1013 0.00 0.000 No No 0.738 1.00 4.54 127.3 2.54 South R2 2 Excl. Slip 928 888 0.00 0.000 No No 0.787 1.00 4.54 132.2 2.54 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Circulating Lane Flow Rates Circulating Flow RateCirc. Lane No July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 286 of 356 veh/h pcu/h Percent South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 170 168 100.0 Approach 170 168 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1 829 795 100.0 Approach 829 795 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 261 251 100.0 Approach 261 251 West: Beach Parking Lane 1 1054 1013 100.0 Approach 1054 1013 Roundabout Capacity Model: The US HCM 6 roundabout capacity model option is in use. This model considers only the total circulating flow and not the flow rates in individual circulating lanes. To model the effects of flow distribution in circulating lanes on the entry capacity results, you should use the SIDRA Standard roundabout capacity model. Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Lanes) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum DelayOpposed Lane Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.32 1.98 8.34 0.808 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 10.28 6.61 3.67 0.357 2.3 North: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.32 2.76 7.56 0.732 0.0 West: Beach Parking 1 5.00 3.53 1.47 0.294 0.0 2 10.02 9.14 0.88 0.088 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Movements) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum Delay To Approach Turn Opsd Lane No Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd West L2 1 10.32 1.98 8.34 0.808 0.0 North T1 1 10.32 1.98 8.34 0.808 0.0 East R2 1 10.32 1.98 8.34 0.808 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave South L2 1 10.28 6.61 3.67 0.357 2.3 West T1 1 10.28 6.61 3.67 0.357 2.3 North R2 1 10.28 6.61 3.67 0.357 2.3 North: Carlsbad Blvd East L2 1 10.32 2.76 7.56 0.732 0.0 South T1 1 10.32 2.76 7.56 0.732 0.0 West R2 1 10.32 2.76 7.56 0.732 0.0 West: Beach Parking North L2 1 5.00 3.53 1.47 0.294 0.0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 287 of 356 East T1 1 5.00 3.53 1.47 0.294 0.0 South R2 2 10.02 9.14 0.88 0.088 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:57:57AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 288 of 356 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [Cumulative SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Thursday, September 1, 2022 11:14:52 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 289 of 356 INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: 101 [Cumulative SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Intersection Performance -Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Travel Speed (Average)32.4 mph 32.4 mph Travel Distance (Total)2610.4 veh-mi/h 3073.2 pers-mi/h Travel Time (Total)80.6 veh-h/h 94.9 pers-h/h Desired Speed (Program)35.9 mph Speed Efficiency 0.90 Travel Time Index 8.91 Congestion Coefficient 1.11 Demand Flows (Total)2320 veh/h 2734 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand)1.8 % Degree of Saturation 0.817 Practical Spare Capacity 4.1 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2841 veh/h Control Delay (Total)9.96 veh-h/h 11.74 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)15.5 sec 15.5 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)23.0 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)23.0 sec 23.0 sec Geometric Delay (Average)0.0 sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)15.5 sec Idling Time (Average)8.5 sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS B 95% Back of Queue -Vehicles (Worst Lane)5.2 veh 95% Back of Queue -Distance (Worst Lane)121.5 ft Ave. Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane)0.03 Total Effective Stops 1769 veh/h 2085 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.76 0.76 Proportion Queued 0.76 0.76 Performance Index 134.4 134.4 Cost (Total)1461.25 $/h 1461.25 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)77.3 gal/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)617.2 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.056 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)0.818 kg/h NOx (Total)0.773 kg/h Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Site Model Variability Index (Iterations 3 to N): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 2 (Maximum: 10) Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance -Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)1,113,600 veh/y 1,312,315 pers/y Delay 4,781 veh-h/y 5,635 pers-h/y Effective Stops 849,042 veh/y 1,000,764 pers/y Travel Distance 1,252,978 veh-mi/y 1,475,119 pers-mi/y Travel Time 38,688 veh-h/y 45,558 pers-h/y July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 290 of 356 Cost 701,400 $/y 701,400 $/y Fuel Consumption 37,089 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 296,257 kg/y Hydrocarbons 27 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 393 kg/y NOx 371 kg/y SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:57:57AMProject: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 291 of 356 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Cumulative SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: Carlsbad Blvd 3 L2 43 0.0 43 0.0 0.755 11.8 LOS B 4.1 96.6 0.65 0.62 0.65 23.7 8 T1 767 2.0 767 2.0 0.755 11.8 LOS B 4.1 96.6 0.65 0.62 0.65 34.3 18 R2 162 2.0 162 2.0 0.755 11.8 LOS B 4.1 96.6 0.65 0.62 0.65 32.6 Approach 972 1.9 972 1.9 0.755 8.5 LOS A 4.1 96.6 0.65 0.62 0.65 33.6 East: Tamarack Ave 1 L2 188 2.0 188 2.0 0.716 22.3 LOS C 3.1 74.2 0.86 0.95 1.19 29.1 6 T1 30 0.0 30 0.0 0.716 22.3 LOS C 3.1 74.2 0.86 0.95 1.19 18.9 16 R2 135 2.0 135 2.0 0.716 22.3 LOS C 3.1 74.2 0.86 0.95 1.19 27.9 Approach 353 1.8 353 1.8 0.716 20.2 LOS C 3.1 74.2 0.86 0.95 1.19 28.2 North: Carlsbad Blvd 7 L2 126 2.0 126 2.0 0.817 16.6 LOS B 5.2 121.5 0.83 0.83 0.83 30.4 4 T1 740 2.0 740 2.0 0.817 16.6 LOS B 5.2 121.5 0.83 0.83 0.83 32.9 14 R2 41 0.0 41 0.0 0.817 16.6 LOS B 5.2 121.5 0.83 0.83 0.83 28.9 Approach 907 1.9 907 1.9 0.817 13.5 LOS B 5.2 121.5 0.83 0.83 0.83 32.5 West: Beach Parking 5 L2 19 0.0 19 0.0 0.422 9.7 LOS A 1.2 28.5 0.99 1.01 1.11 31.0 2 T1 25 0.0 25 0.0 0.422 9.7 LOS A 1.2 28.5 0.99 1.01 1.11 24.2 12 R2 44 0.0 44 0.0 0.354 23.0 LOS C 0.3 8.5 0.94 0.94 0.94 29.3 Approach 88 0.0 88 0.0 0.422 16.4 LOS B 1.2 28.5 0.97 0.98 1.03 28.9 All Vehicles 2320 1.8 2320 1.8 0.817 15.5 LOS B 5.2 121.5 0.76 0.76 0.81 32.4 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:57:57AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 292 of 356 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Cumulative SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Lane Use and Performance DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUECap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Aver. Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block. [ Total HV ][ Veh Dist ] veh/h %veh/h v/c %sec ft ft %% South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 972 1.9 1287 0.755 100 8.5 LOS A 4.1 96.6 Full 3773 0.0 0.0 Approach 972 1.9 0.755 8.5 LOS A 4.1 96.6 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1d 353 1.8 493 0.716 100 20.2 LOS C 3.1 74.2 Full 985 0.0 0.0 Approach 353 1.8 0.716 20.2 LOS C 3.1 74.2 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 907 1.9 1111 0.817 100 13.5 LOS B 5.2 121.5 Full 3003 0.0 0.0 Approach 907 1.9 0.817 13.5 LOS B 5.2 121.5 West: Beach Parking Lane 1d 44 0.0 104 0.422 100 9.7 LOS A 1.2 28.5 Full 349 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 44 0.0 124 0.354 100 23.0 LOS C 0.3 8.5 Short 60 0.0 NA Approach 88 0.0 0.422 16.4 LOS B 1.2 28.5 Intersection 2320 1.8 0.817 15.5 LOS B 5.2 121.5 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach Approach Lane Flows (veh/h) South: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From S To Exit:W N E Lane 1 43 767 162 972 1.9 1287 0.755 100 NA NA Approach 43 767 162 972 1.9 0.755 East: Tamarack Ave Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From E To Exit:S W N Lane 1 188 30 135 353 1.8 493 0.716 100 NA NA July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 293 of 356 Approach 188 30 135 353 1.8 0.716 North: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From N To Exit:E S W Lane 1 126 740 41 907 1.9 1111 0.817 100 NA NA Approach 126 740 41 907 1.9 0.817 West: Beach Parking Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From W To Exit:N E S Lane 1 19 25 -44 0.0 104 0.422 100 NA NA Lane 2 --44 44 0.0 124 0.354 100 0.0 1 Approach 19 25 44 88 0.0 0.422 Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c) Intersection 2320 1.8 0.817 Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable. Merge Analysis Exit Lane Number Short Lane Length Percent Opng in Lane Opposing Flow Rate Critical Gap Follow-up Headway Lane Flow Rate Capacity Deg. Satn Min. Delay Merge Delay ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec South Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. East Exit: Tamarack Ave Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. North Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. West Exit: Beach Parking Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:57:57AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 294 of 356 ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS Site: 101 [Horizon Year AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Roundabout Basic Parameters Central Island Diam Circ Width Insc Diam Entry Radius Entry Angle Circ Lanes Entry Lanes Av.Entry Lane Width App. Dist Prop Queued Upstr Signal Extra BunchingLocationName ft ft ft ft °ft ft % South Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 52.0*42.0*1 1 15.00*3773.0 NA5 0.0 East Tamarack Ave 70.00*17.00*104.0* 50.0*12.0*1 1 16.00*985.0 NA5 0.0 North Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 40.0*26.0*1 1 14.00*3003.0 NA5 0.0 West Beach Parking 70.00*17.00*104.0* 46.0*39.0*1 218 18.00*349.0 NA5 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 5 Not Applicable (single Site analysis or unconnected Site in Network analysis). * These parameters do not affect estimated capacity values in the HCM 6 Capacity Model. 18 Exclusive slip/bypass lane is included in Entry Lanes count. Roundabout Entry and Circulating / Exiting Stream Parameters Critical GapTo Approach Turn Lane No Lane Type Opng Flow Opng Flow In- Bunch Hdwy Prop. Bunched Cap Const Effect Priority Sharing OD Factor HVE for Entry Follow- up Hdwy [ Hdwy Dist ] veh/h pcu/h sec sec ft sec South: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High West L2 1 Dominant 60 61 0.00 0.000 No No 0.989 1.00 4.37 93.8 2.29 North T1 1 Dominant 60 61 0.00 0.000 No No 0.989 1.02 4.37 93.8 2.29 East R2 1 Dominant 60 61 0.00 0.000 No No 0.989 1.02 4.37 93.8 2.29 East: Tamarack Ave Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High South L2 1 Dominant 246 241 0.00 0.000 No No 0.992 1.02 4.92 149.5 2.58 West T1 1 Dominant 246 241 0.00 0.000 No No 0.992 1.00 4.92 149.5 2.58 North R2 1 Dominant 246 241 0.00 0.000 No No 0.992 1.02 4.92 149.5 2.58 North: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High East L2 1 Dominant 263 259 0.00 0.000 No No 0.977 1.02 4.77 103.1 2.50 South T1 1 Dominant 263 259 0.00 0.000 No No 0.977 1.02 4.77 103.1 2.50 West R2 1 Dominant 263 259 0.00 0.000 No No 0.977 1.00 4.77 103.1 2.50 West: Beach Parking Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High North L2 1 Dominant 688 689 0.00 0.000 No No 0.928 1.00 4.54 123.2 2.54 East T1 1 Dominant 688 689 0.00 0.000 No No 0.928 1.00 4.54 123.2 2.54 South R2 2 Excl. Slip 641 641 0.00 0.000 No No 0.938 1.00 4.54 125.5 2.54 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Circulating Lane Flow Rates Circulating Flow RateCirc. Lane No July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 295 of 356 veh/h pcu/h Percent South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 60 61 100.0 Approach 60 61 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1 246 241 100.0 Approach 246 241 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 263 259 100.0 Approach 263 259 West: Beach Parking Lane 1 688 689 100.0 Approach 688 689 Roundabout Capacity Model: The US HCM 6 roundabout capacity model option is in use. This model considers only the total circulating flow and not the flow rates in individual circulating lanes. To model the effects of flow distribution in circulating lanes on the entry capacity results, you should use the SIDRA Standard roundabout capacity model. Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Lanes) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum DelayOpposed Lane Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.23 0.85 9.38 0.917 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 10.22 2.44 7.78 0.761 0.0 North: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.23 2.65 7.58 0.741 0.0 West: Beach Parking 1 5.18 2.70 2.48 0.478 0.0 2 10.43 9.12 1.31 0.125 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Movements) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum Delay To Approach Turn Opsd Lane No Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd West L2 1 10.23 0.85 9.38 0.917 0.0 North T1 1 10.23 0.85 9.38 0.917 0.0 East R2 1 10.23 0.85 9.38 0.917 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave South L2 1 10.22 2.44 7.78 0.761 0.0 West T1 1 10.22 2.44 7.78 0.761 0.0 North R2 1 10.22 2.44 7.78 0.761 0.0 North: Carlsbad Blvd East L2 1 10.23 2.65 7.58 0.741 0.0 South T1 1 10.23 2.65 7.58 0.741 0.0 West R2 1 10.23 2.65 7.58 0.741 0.0 West: Beach Parking North L2 1 5.18 2.70 2.48 0.478 0.0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 296 of 356 East T1 1 5.18 2.70 2.48 0.478 0.0 South R2 2 10.43 9.12 1.31 0.125 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:59:35 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 297 of 356 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [Horizon Year AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:59:37 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 298 of 356 INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: 101 [Horizon Year AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Intersection Performance -Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Travel Speed (Average)36.0 mph 36.0 mph Travel Distance (Total)1247.3 veh-mi/h 1483.6 pers-mi/h Travel Time (Total)34.6 veh-h/h 41.2 pers-h/h Desired Speed (Program)38.0 mph Speed Efficiency 0.95 Travel Time Index 9.42 Congestion Coefficient 1.06 Demand Flows (Total)1140 veh/h 1355 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand)1.8 % Degree of Saturation 0.460 Practical Spare Capacity 84.6 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2476 veh/h Control Delay (Total)1.15 veh-h/h 1.37 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)3.6 sec 3.6 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)8.4 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)8.4 sec 8.4 sec Geometric Delay (Average)0.0 sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)3.6 sec Idling Time (Average)0.5 sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS A 95% Back of Queue -Vehicles (Worst Lane)1.6 veh 95% Back of Queue -Distance (Worst Lane)40.4 ft Ave. Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane)0.01 Total Effective Stops 395 veh/h 470 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.35 0.35 Proportion Queued 0.36 0.36 Performance Index 43.9 43.9 Cost (Total)669.40 $/h 669.40 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)38.5 gal/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)327.3 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.028 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)0.440 kg/h NOx (Total)0.373 kg/h Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Site Model Variability Index (Iterations 3 to N): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 2 (Maximum: 10) Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance -Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)547,200 veh/y 650,591 pers/y Delay 554 veh-h/y 659 pers-h/y Effective Stops 189,366 veh/y 225,449 pers/y Travel Distance 598,680 veh-mi/y 712,124 pers-mi/y Travel Time 16,622 veh-h/y 19,771 pers-h/y July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 299 of 356 Cost 321,312 $/y 321,312 $/y Fuel Consumption 18,488 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 157,110 kg/y Hydrocarbons 14 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 211 kg/y NOx 179 kg/y SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:59:35 AMProject: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 300 of 356 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Horizon Year AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: Carlsbad Blvd 3 L2 15 0.0 15 0.0 0.217 1.8 LOS A 0.3 6.6 0.14 0.11 0.14 25.5 8 T1 225 2.0 225 2.0 0.217 1.8 LOS A 0.3 6.6 0.14 0.11 0.14 37.0 18 R2 72 2.0 72 2.0 0.217 1.8 LOS A 0.3 6.6 0.14 0.11 0.14 35.7 Approach 312 1.9 312 1.9 0.217 0.7 LOS A 0.3 6.6 0.14 0.11 0.14 36.2 East: Tamarack Ave 1 L2 214 2.0 214 2.0 0.298 2.9 LOS A 0.8 20.3 0.37 0.35 0.37 35.5 6 T1 34 0.0 34 0.0 0.298 2.9 LOS A 0.8 20.3 0.37 0.35 0.37 28.7 16 R2 69 2.0 69 2.0 0.298 2.9 LOS A 0.8 20.3 0.37 0.35 0.37 34.3 Approach 317 1.8 317 1.8 0.298 1.8 LOS A 0.8 20.3 0.37 0.35 0.37 34.9 North: Carlsbad Blvd 7 L2 47 2.0 47 2.0 0.460 5.1 LOS A 1.6 40.4 0.48 0.47 0.48 35.2 4 T1 427 2.0 427 2.0 0.460 5.1 LOS A 1.6 40.4 0.48 0.47 0.48 36.7 14 R2 17 0.0 17 0.0 0.460 5.1 LOS A 1.6 40.4 0.48 0.47 0.48 30.0 Approach 491 1.9 491 1.9 0.460 3.4 LOS A 1.6 40.4 0.48 0.47 0.48 36.5 West: Beach Parking 5 L2 6 0.0 6 0.0 0.077 6.6 LOS A 0.2 4.5 0.91 0.91 0.91 32.8 2 T1 7 0.0 7 0.0 0.077 6.6 LOS A 0.2 4.5 0.91 0.91 0.91 26.3 12 R2 7 0.0 7 0.0 0.039 8.4 LOS A 0.1 1.3 0.88 0.88 0.88 34.8 Approach 20 0.0 20 0.0 0.077 7.2 LOS A 0.2 4.5 0.90 0.90 0.90 32.3 All Vehicles 1140 1.8 1140 1.8 0.460 3.6 LOS A 1.6 40.4 0.36 0.35 0.36 36.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:59:35 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 301 of 356 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Horizon Year AM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Lane Use and Performance DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUECap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Aver. Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block. [ Total HV ][ Veh Dist ] veh/h %veh/h v/c %sec ft ft %% South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 312 1.9 1440 0.217 100 0.7 LOS A 0.3 6.6 Full 3773 0.0 0.0 Approach 312 1.9 0.217 0.7 LOS A 0.3 6.6 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1d 317 1.8 1063 0.298 100 1.8 LOS A 0.8 20.3 Full 985 0.0 0.0 Approach 317 1.8 0.298 1.8 LOS A 0.8 20.3 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 491 1.9 1067 0.460 100 3.4 LOS A 1.6 40.4 Full 3003 0.0 0.0 Approach 491 1.9 0.460 3.4 LOS A 1.6 40.4 West: Beach Parking Lane 1d 13 0.0 170 0.077 100 6.6 LOS A 0.2 4.5 Full 349 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 7 0.0 178 0.039 100 8.4 LOS A 0.1 1.3 Short 60 0.0 NA Approach 20 0.0 0.077 7.2 LOS A 0.2 4.5 Intersection 1140 1.8 0.460 3.6 LOS A 1.6 40.4 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach Approach Lane Flows (veh/h) South: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From S To Exit:W N E Lane 1 15 225 72 312 1.9 1440 0.217 100 NA NA Approach 15 225 72 312 1.9 0.217 East: Tamarack Ave Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From E To Exit:S W N Lane 1 214 34 69 317 1.8 1063 0.298 100 NA NA July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 302 of 356 Approach 214 34 69 317 1.8 0.298 North: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From N To Exit:E S W Lane 1 47 427 17 491 1.9 1067 0.460 100 NA NA Approach 47 427 17 491 1.9 0.460 West: Beach Parking Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From W To Exit:N E S Lane 1 6 7 -13 0.0 170 0.077 100 NA NA Lane 2 --7 7 0.0 178 0.039 100 0.0 1 Approach 6 7 7 20 0.0 0.077 Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c) Intersection 1140 1.8 0.460 Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable. Merge Analysis Exit Lane Number Short Lane Length Percent Opng in Lane Opposing Flow Rate Critical Gap Follow-up Headway Lane Flow Rate Capacity Deg. Satn Min. Delay Merge Delay ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec South Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. East Exit: Tamarack Ave Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. North Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. West Exit: Beach Parking Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 10:59:35 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 303 of 356 ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS Site: 101 [Horizon Year PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Roundabout Basic Parameters Central Island Diam Circ Width Insc Diam Entry Radius Entry Angle Circ Lanes Entry Lanes Av.Entry Lane Width App. Dist Prop Queued Upstr Signal Extra BunchingLocationName ft ft ft ft °ft ft % South Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 52.0*42.0*1 1 15.00*3773.0 NA5 0.0 East Tamarack Ave 70.00*17.00*104.0* 50.0*12.0*1 1 16.00*985.0 NA5 0.0 North Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 40.0*26.0*1 1 14.00*3003.0 NA5 0.0 West Beach Parking 70.00*17.00*104.0* 46.0*39.0*1 218 18.00*349.0 NA5 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 5 Not Applicable (single Site analysis or unconnected Site in Network analysis). * These parameters do not affect estimated capacity values in the HCM 6 Capacity Model. 18 Exclusive slip/bypass lane is included in Entry Lanes count. Roundabout Entry and Circulating / Exiting Stream Parameters Critical GapTo Approach Turn Lane No Lane Type Opng Flow Opng Flow In- Bunch Hdwy Prop. Bunched Cap Const Effect Priority Sharing OD Factor HVE for Entry Follow- up Hdwy [ Hdwy Dist ] veh/h pcu/h sec sec ft sec South: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High West L2 1 Dominant 136 138 0.00 0.000 No No 0.944 1.00 4.11 88.3 2.15 North T1 1 Dominant 136 138 0.00 0.000 No No 0.944 1.02 4.11 88.3 2.15 East R2 1 Dominant 136 138 0.00 0.000 No No 0.944 1.02 4.11 88.3 2.15 East: Tamarack Ave Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High South L2 1 Dominant 980 979 0.00 0.000 No No 0.795 1.02 4.98 153.4 2.61 West T1 1 Dominant 980 979 0.00 0.000 No No 0.795 1.00 4.98 153.4 2.61 North R2 1 Dominant 980 979 0.00 0.000 No No 0.795 1.02 4.98 153.4 2.61 North: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High East L2 1 Dominant 151 152 0.00 0.000 No No 0.972 1.02 4.48 95.0 2.35 South T1 1 Dominant 151 152 0.00 0.000 No No 0.972 1.02 4.48 95.0 2.35 West R2 1 Dominant 151 152 0.00 0.000 No No 0.972 1.00 4.48 95.0 2.35 West: Beach Parking Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High North L2 1 Dominant 708 694 0.00 0.000 No No 0.941 1.00 4.54 127.5 2.54 East T1 1 Dominant 708 694 0.00 0.000 No No 0.941 1.00 4.54 127.5 2.54 South R2 2 Excl. Slip 604 588 0.00 0.000 No No 0.956 1.00 4.54 133.6 2.54 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Circulating Lane Flow Rates Circulating Flow RateCirc. Lane No July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 304 of 356 veh/h pcu/h Percent South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 136 138 100.0 Approach 136 138 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1 980 979 100.0 Approach 980 979 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 151 152 100.0 Approach 151 152 West: Beach Parking Lane 1 708 694 100.0 Approach 708 694 Roundabout Capacity Model: The US HCM 6 roundabout capacity model option is in use. This model considers only the total circulating flow and not the flow rates in individual circulating lanes. To model the effects of flow distribution in circulating lanes on the entry capacity results, you should use the SIDRA Standard roundabout capacity model. Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Lanes) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum DelayOpposed Lane Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd 1 6.15 0.89 5.27 0.856 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 6.11 4.45 1.67 0.272 1.4 North: Carlsbad Blvd 1 6.15 1.08 5.07 0.824 0.0 West: Beach Parking 1 1.04 0.54 0.50 0.483 0.0 2 6.31 6.03 0.28 0.044 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Movements) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum Delay To Approach Turn Opsd Lane No Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd West L2 1 6.15 0.89 5.27 0.856 0.0 North T1 1 6.15 0.89 5.27 0.856 0.0 East R2 1 6.15 0.89 5.27 0.856 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave South L2 1 6.11 4.45 1.67 0.272 1.4 West T1 1 6.11 4.45 1.67 0.272 1.4 North R2 1 6.11 4.45 1.67 0.272 1.4 North: Carlsbad Blvd East L2 1 6.15 1.08 5.07 0.824 0.0 South T1 1 6.15 1.08 5.07 0.824 0.0 West R2 1 6.15 1.08 5.07 0.824 0.0 West: Beach Parking North L2 1 1.04 0.54 0.50 0.483 0.0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 305 of 356 East T1 1 1.04 0.54 0.50 0.483 0.0 South R2 2 6.31 6.03 0.28 0.044 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 11:00:21 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 306 of 356 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [Horizon Year PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, September 16, 2022 11:00:27 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 307 of 356 INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: 101 [Horizon Year PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Intersection Performance -Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Travel Speed (Average)33.3 mph 33.3 mph Travel Distance (Total)2476.4 veh-mi/h 2944.7 pers-mi/h Travel Time (Total)74.4 veh-h/h 88.5 pers-h/h Desired Speed (Program)37.9 mph Speed Efficiency 0.88 Travel Time Index 8.64 Congestion Coefficient 1.14 Demand Flows (Total)2154 veh/h 2563 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand)1.9 % Degree of Saturation 0.894 Practical Spare Capacity -4.9 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2410 veh/h Control Delay (Total)9.39 veh-h/h 11.19 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)15.7 sec 15.7 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)46.1 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)46.1 sec 46.1 sec Geometric Delay (Average)0.0 sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)15.7 sec Idling Time (Average)9.3 sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS B 95% Back of Queue -Vehicles (Worst Lane)4.0 veh 95% Back of Queue -Distance (Worst Lane)99.0 ft Ave. Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane)0.02 Total Effective Stops 1300 veh/h 1548 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.60 0.60 Proportion Queued 0.60 0.60 Performance Index 100.3 100.3 Cost (Total)1416.16 $/h 1416.16 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)78.4 gal/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)665.8 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.058 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)0.889 kg/h NOx (Total)0.749 kg/h Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Site Model Variability Index (Iterations 3 to N): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 2 (Maximum: 10) Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance -Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)1,033,920 veh/y 1,230,245 pers/y Delay 4,507 veh-h/y 5,372 pers-h/y Effective Stops 623,801 veh/y 743,183 pers/y Travel Distance 1,188,685 veh-mi/y 1,413,479 pers-mi/y Travel Time 35,700 veh-h/y 42,463 pers-h/y July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 308 of 356 Cost 679,755 $/y 679,755 $/y Fuel Consumption 37,620 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 319,603 kg/y Hydrocarbons 28 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 427 kg/y NOx 359 kg/y SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 11:00:21 AMProject: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 309 of 356 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Horizon Year PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: Carlsbad Blvd 3 L2 33 0.0 33 0.0 0.894 20.4 LOS C 4.0 99.0 0.68 0.68 0.68 22.7 8 T1 961 2.0 961 2.0 0.894 20.4 LOS C 4.0 99.0 0.68 0.68 0.68 33.5 18 R2 284 2.0 284 2.0 0.894 20.4 LOS C 4.0 99.0 0.68 0.68 0.68 31.1 Approach 1278 1.9 1278 1.9 0.894 16.2 LOS B 4.0 99.0 0.68 0.68 0.68 32.8 East: Tamarack Ave 1 L2 105 2.0 105 2.0 0.527 14.2 LOS B 0.9 22.0 0.85 0.87 0.93 32.3 6 T1 14 0.0 14 0.0 0.527 14.2 LOS B 0.9 22.0 0.85 0.87 0.93 13.0 16 R2 79 2.0 79 2.0 0.527 14.2 LOS B 0.9 22.0 0.85 0.87 0.93 30.6 Approach 198 1.9 198 1.9 0.527 12.1 LOS B 0.9 22.0 0.85 0.87 0.93 30.6 North: Carlsbad Blvd 7 L2 104 2.0 104 2.0 0.490 5.2 LOS A 0.9 22.3 0.31 0.31 0.31 34.8 4 T1 499 2.0 499 2.0 0.490 5.2 LOS A 0.9 22.3 0.31 0.31 0.31 35.9 14 R2 15 0.0 15 0.0 0.490 5.2 LOS A 0.9 22.3 0.31 0.31 0.31 29.7 Approach 618 2.0 618 2.0 0.490 2.9 LOS A 0.9 22.3 0.31 0.31 0.31 35.7 West: Beach Parking 5 L2 16 0.0 16 0.0 0.560 15.4 LOS B 0.4 9.1 1.00 1.07 1.68 29.1 2 T1 16 0.0 16 0.0 0.560 15.4 LOS B 0.4 9.1 1.00 1.07 1.68 21.1 12 R2 28 0.0 28 0.0 0.444 46.1 LOS D 0.1 3.5 0.97 0.97 0.97 23.6 Approach 60 0.0 60 0.0 0.560 29.8 LOS C 0.4 9.1 0.99 1.03 1.35 24.6 All Vehicles 2154 1.9 2154 1.9 0.894 15.7 LOS B 4.0 99.0 0.60 0.60 0.62 33.3 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 11:00:21 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 310 of 356 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Horizon Year PM Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Lane Use and Performance DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUECap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Aver. Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block. [ Total HV ][ Veh Dist ] veh/h %veh/h v/c %sec ft ft %% South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 1278 1.9 1430 0.894 100 16.2 LOS B 4.0 99.0 Full 3773 0.0 0.0 Approach 1278 1.9 0.894 16.2 LOS B 4.0 99.0 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1d 198 1.9 376 0.527 100 12.1 LOS B 0.9 22.0 Full 985 0.0 0.0 Approach 198 1.9 0.527 12.1 LOS B 0.9 22.0 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 618 2.0 1262 0.490 100 2.9 LOS A 0.9 22.3 Full 3003 0.0 0.0 Approach 618 2.0 0.490 2.9 LOS A 0.9 22.3 West: Beach Parking Lane 1d 32 0.0 57 0.560 100 15.4 LOS B 0.4 9.1 Full 349 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 28 0.0 63 0.444 100 46.1 LOS D 0.1 3.5 Short 60 0.0 NA Approach 60 0.0 0.560 29.8 LOS C 0.4 9.1 Intersection 2154 1.9 0.894 15.7 LOS B 4.0 99.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach Approach Lane Flows (veh/h) South: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From S To Exit:W N E Lane 1 33 961 284 1278 1.9 1430 0.894 100 NA NA Approach 33 961 284 1278 1.9 0.894 East: Tamarack Ave Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From E To Exit:S W N Lane 1 105 14 79 198 1.9 376 0.527 100 NA NA July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 311 of 356 Approach 105 14 79 198 1.9 0.527 North: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From N To Exit:E S W Lane 1 104 499 15 618 2.0 1262 0.490 100 NA NA Approach 104 499 15 618 2.0 0.490 West: Beach Parking Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From W To Exit:N E S Lane 1 16 16 -32 0.0 57 0.560 100 NA NA Lane 2 --28 28 0.0 63 0.444 100 0.0 1 Approach 16 16 28 60 0.0 0.560 Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c) Intersection 2154 1.9 0.894 Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable. Merge Analysis Exit Lane Number Short Lane Length Percent Opng in Lane Opposing Flow Rate Critical Gap Follow-up Headway Lane Flow Rate Capacity Deg. Satn Min. Delay Merge Delay ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec South Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. East Exit: Tamarack Ave Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. North Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. West Exit: Beach Parking Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, September 16, 2022 11:00:21 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\productiondata\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 312 of 356 ROUNDABOUT ANALYSIS Site: 101 [Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Roundabout Basic Parameters Central Island Diam Circ Width Insc Diam Entry Radius Entry Angle Circ Lanes Entry Lanes Av.Entry Lane Width App. Dist Prop Queued Upstr Signal Extra BunchingLocationName ft ft ft ft °ft ft % South Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 52.0*42.0*1 1 15.00*3773.0 NA5 0.0 East Tamarack Ave 70.00*17.00*104.0* 50.0*12.0*1 1 16.00*985.0 NA5 0.0 North Carlsbad Blvd 70.00*17.00*104.0* 40.0*26.0*1 1 14.00*3003.0 NA5 0.0 West Beach Parking 70.00*17.00*104.0* 46.0*39.0*1 218 18.00*349.0 NA5 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 5 Not Applicable (single Site analysis or unconnected Site in Network analysis). * These parameters do not affect estimated capacity values in the HCM 6 Capacity Model. 18 Exclusive slip/bypass lane is included in Entry Lanes count. Roundabout Entry and Circulating / Exiting Stream Parameters Critical GapTo Approach Turn Lane No Lane Type Opng Flow Opng Flow In- Bunch Hdwy Prop. Bunched Cap Const Effect Priority Sharing OD Factor HVE for Entry Follow- up Hdwy [ Hdwy Dist ] veh/h pcu/h sec sec ft sec South: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High West L2 1 Dominant 167 165 0.00 0.000 No No 0.966 1.00 4.32 94.4 2.27 North T1 1 Dominant 167 165 0.00 0.000 No No 0.966 1.02 4.32 94.4 2.27 East R2 1 Dominant 167 165 0.00 0.000 No No 0.966 1.02 4.32 94.4 2.27 East: Tamarack Ave Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High South L2 1 Dominant 786 751 0.00 0.000 No No 0.854 1.02 4.98 151.7 2.61 West T1 1 Dominant 786 751 0.00 0.000 No No 0.854 1.00 4.98 151.7 2.61 North R2 1 Dominant 786 751 0.00 0.000 No No 0.854 1.02 4.98 151.7 2.61 North: Carlsbad Blvd Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High East L2 1 Dominant 244 233 0.00 0.000 No No 0.961 1.02 4.51 96.7 2.37 South T1 1 Dominant 244 233 0.00 0.000 No No 0.961 1.02 4.51 96.7 2.37 West R2 1 Dominant 244 233 0.00 0.000 No No 0.961 1.00 4.51 96.7 2.37 West: Beach Parking Model Calibration Factor (HCM 6): 1.00 Entry/Circ Flow Adj (HCM 6): High North L2 1 Dominant 1017 975 0.00 0.000 No No 0.771 1.00 4.54 127.7 2.54 East T1 1 Dominant 1017 975 0.00 0.000 No No 0.771 1.00 4.54 127.7 2.54 South R2 2 Excl. Slip 894 853 0.00 0.000 No No 0.815 1.00 4.54 132.6 2.54 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Circulating Lane Flow Rates Circulating Flow RateCirc. Lane July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 313 of 356 No veh/h pcu/h Percent South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 167 165 100.0 Approach 167 165 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1 786 751 100.0 Approach 786 751 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1 244 233 100.0 Approach 244 233 West: Beach Parking Lane 1 1017 975 100.0 Approach 1017 975 Roundabout Capacity Model: The US HCM 6 roundabout capacity model option is in use. This model considers only the total circulating flow and not the flow rates in individual circulating lanes. To model the effects of flow distribution in circulating lanes on the entry capacity results, you should use the SIDRA Standard roundabout capacity model. Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Lanes) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum DelayOpposed Lane Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.32 1.94 8.38 0.812 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave 1 10.28 6.30 3.98 0.387 2.3 North: Carlsbad Blvd 1 10.32 2.58 7.74 0.750 0.0 West: Beach Parking 1 5.00 3.41 1.59 0.318 0.0 2 10.04 9.10 0.94 0.093 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 Gap Acceptance Cycle Parameters (Movements) Cycle Time Blocked Time Unblocked Time Minimum Delay To Approach Turn Opsd Lane No Unblocked Time Ratio sec sec sec sec South: Carlsbad Blvd West L2 1 10.32 1.94 8.38 0.812 0.0 North T1 1 10.32 1.94 8.38 0.812 0.0 East R2 1 10.32 1.94 8.38 0.812 0.0 East: Tamarack Ave South L2 1 10.28 6.30 3.98 0.387 2.3 West T1 1 10.28 6.30 3.98 0.387 2.3 North R2 1 10.28 6.30 3.98 0.387 2.3 North: Carlsbad Blvd East L2 1 10.32 2.58 7.74 0.750 0.0 South T1 1 10.32 2.58 7.74 0.750 0.0 West R2 1 10.32 2.58 7.74 0.750 0.0 West: Beach Parking North L2 1 5.00 3.41 1.59 0.318 0.0 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 314 of 356 East T1 1 5.00 3.41 1.59 0.318 0.0 South R2 2 10.04 9.10 0.94 0.093 0.0 Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6 SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:58:58AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 315 of 356 SITE LAYOUT Site: 101 [Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Thursday, September 1, 2022 11:19:34 AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 316 of 356 INTERSECTION SUMMARY Site: 101 [Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Intersection Performance -Hourly Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Travel Speed (Average)33.0 mph 33.0 mph Travel Distance (Total)2494.6 veh-mi/h 2934.3 pers-mi/h Travel Time (Total)75.5 veh-h/h 88.8 pers-h/h Desired Speed (Program)35.8 mph Speed Efficiency 0.92 Travel Time Index 9.16 Congestion Coefficient 1.08 Demand Flows (Total)2216 veh/h 2609 pers/h Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand)1.8 % Degree of Saturation 0.775 Practical Spare Capacity 9.7 % Effective Intersection Capacity 2861 veh/h Control Delay (Total)7.71 veh-h/h 9.08 pers-h/h Control Delay (Average)12.5 sec 12.5 sec Control Delay (Worst Lane)20.8 sec Control Delay (Worst Movement)20.8 sec 20.8 sec Geometric Delay (Average)0.0 sec Stop-Line Delay (Average)12.5 sec Idling Time (Average)6.1 sec Intersection Level of Service (LOS)LOS B 95% Back of Queue -Vehicles (Worst Lane)4.5 veh 95% Back of Queue -Distance (Worst Lane)105.8 ft Ave. Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane)0.03 Total Effective Stops 1537 veh/h 1810 pers/h Effective Stop Rate 0.69 0.69 Proportion Queued 0.70 0.70 Performance Index 122.1 122.1 Cost (Total)1366.54 $/h 1366.54 $/h Fuel Consumption (Total)72.6 gal/h Carbon Dioxide (Total)576.4 kg/h Hydrocarbons (Total)0.052 kg/h Carbon Monoxide (Total)0.766 kg/h NOx (Total)0.729 kg/h Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Site Model Variability Index (Iterations 3 to N): 0.0 % Number of Iterations: 2 (Maximum: 10) Largest change in Lane Degrees of Saturation for the last three Flow-Capacity Iterations: 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Intersection Performance -Annual Values Performance Measure Vehicles Persons Demand Flows (Total)1,063,680 veh/y 1,252,419 pers/y Delay 3,701 veh-h/y 4,358 pers-h/y Effective Stops 737,685 veh/y 868,842 pers/y Travel Distance 1,197,423 veh-mi/y 1,408,463 pers-mi/y July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 317 of 356 Travel Time 36,234 veh-h/y 42,629 pers-h/y Cost 655,940 $/y 655,940 $/y Fuel Consumption 34,831 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 276,686 kg/y Hydrocarbons 25 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 368 kg/y NOx 350 kg/y SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:58:58AMProject: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 318 of 356 MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: 101 [Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Vehicle Movement Performance INPUT VOLUMES DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUE Mov ID Turn Deg. Satn Aver. Delay Level of Service Prop. Que Effective Stop Rate Aver. No. Cycles Aver. Speed [ Total HV ][ Total HV ][ Veh.Dist ] veh/h %veh/h %v/c sec veh ft mph South: Carlsbad Blvd 3 L2 43 0.0 43 0.0 0.712 10.1 LOS B 3.5 82.4 0.59 0.55 0.59 24.0 8 T1 724 2.0 724 2.0 0.712 10.1 LOS B 3.5 82.4 0.59 0.55 0.59 34.6 18 R2 152 2.0 152 2.0 0.712 10.1 LOS B 3.5 82.4 0.59 0.55 0.59 33.0 Approach 919 1.9 919 1.9 0.712 7.0 LOS A 3.5 82.4 0.59 0.55 0.59 33.9 East: Tamarack Ave 1 L2 173 2.0 173 2.0 0.609 15.3 LOS B 2.6 60.6 0.80 0.86 1.03 30.8 6 T1 28 0.0 28 0.0 0.609 15.3 LOS B 2.6 60.6 0.80 0.86 1.03 21.6 16 R2 124 2.0 124 2.0 0.609 15.3 LOS B 2.6 60.6 0.80 0.86 1.03 29.8 Approach 325 1.8 325 1.8 0.609 13.6 LOS B 2.6 60.6 0.80 0.86 1.03 30.0 North: Carlsbad Blvd 7 L2 123 2.0 123 2.0 0.775 13.7 LOS B 4.5 105.8 0.75 0.75 0.75 31.4 4 T1 721 2.0 721 2.0 0.775 13.7 LOS B 4.5 105.8 0.75 0.75 0.75 33.5 14 R2 40 0.0 40 0.0 0.775 13.7 LOS B 4.5 105.8 0.75 0.75 0.75 29.9 Approach 884 1.9 884 1.9 0.775 10.6 LOS B 4.5 105.8 0.75 0.75 0.75 33.2 West: Beach Parking 5 L2 19 0.0 19 0.0 0.390 9.2 LOS A 1.1 27.6 0.98 0.99 1.03 31.2 2 T1 25 0.0 25 0.0 0.390 9.2 LOS A 1.1 27.6 0.98 0.99 1.03 24.6 12 R2 44 0.0 44 0.0 0.332 20.8 LOS C 0.3 8.4 0.94 0.94 0.94 30.0 Approach 88 0.0 88 0.0 0.390 15.0 LOS B 1.1 27.6 0.96 0.96 0.98 29.4 All Vehicles 2216 1.8 2216 1.8 0.775 12.5 LOS B 4.5 105.8 0.70 0.69 0.73 33.0 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:58:58AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 319 of 356 LANE SUMMARY Site: 101 [Horizon Year SAT Pk Hr -Signal (Site Folder: General)] New Site Site Category: (None) Roundabout Metering Lane Use and Performance DEMAND FLOWS 95% BACK OF QUEUECap.Deg. Satn Lane Util. Aver. Delay Level of Service Lane Config Lane Length Cap. Adj. Prob. Block. [ Total HV ][ Veh Dist ] veh/h %veh/h v/c %sec ft ft %% South: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 919 1.9 1290 0.712 100 7.0 LOS A 3.5 82.4 Full 3773 0.0 0.0 Approach 919 1.9 0.712 7.0 LOS A 3.5 82.4 East: Tamarack Ave Lane 1d 325 1.8 534 0.609 100 13.6 LOS B 2.6 60.6 Full 985 0.0 0.0 Approach 325 1.8 0.609 13.6 LOS B 2.6 60.6 North: Carlsbad Blvd Lane 1d 884 1.9 1141 0.775 100 10.6 LOS B 4.5 105.8 Full 3003 0.0 0.0 Approach 884 1.9 0.775 10.6 LOS B 4.5 105.8 West: Beach Parking Lane 1d 44 0.0 113 0.390 100 9.2 LOS A 1.1 27.6 Full 349 0.0 0.0 Lane 2 44 0.0 133 0.332 100 20.8 LOS C 0.3 8.4 Short 60 0.0 NA Approach 88 0.0 0.390 15.0 LOS B 1.1 27.6 Intersection 2216 1.8 0.775 12.5 LOS B 4.5 105.8 Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Signalised Intersections. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 6. Delay Model: HCM Delay Formula (Geometric Delay is not included). Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach Approach Lane Flows (veh/h) South: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From S To Exit:W N E Lane 1 43 724 152 919 1.9 1290 0.712 100 NA NA Approach 43 724 152 919 1.9 0.712 East: Tamarack Ave Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From E To Exit:S W N Lane 1 173 28 124 325 1.8 534 0.609 100 NA NA July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 320 of 356 Approach 173 28 124 325 1.8 0.609 North: Carlsbad Blvd Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From N To Exit:E S W Lane 1 123 721 40 884 1.9 1141 0.775 100 NA NA Approach 123 721 40 884 1.9 0.775 West: Beach Parking Mov.L2 T1 R2 Total %HV Cap. veh/h Deg. Satn v/c Lane Util. % Prob. SL Ov. % Ov. Lane No.From W To Exit:N E S Lane 1 19 25 -44 0.0 113 0.390 100 NA NA Lane 2 --44 44 0.0 133 0.332 100 0.0 1 Approach 19 25 44 88 0.0 0.390 Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c) Intersection 2216 1.8 0.775 Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable. Merge Analysis Exit Lane Number Short Lane Length Percent Opng in Lane Opposing Flow Rate Critical Gap Follow-up Headway Lane Flow Rate Capacity Deg. Satn Min. Delay Merge Delay ft %veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec South Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. East Exit: Tamarack Ave Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. North Exit: Carlsbad Blvd Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. West Exit: Beach Parking Merge Type: Not Applied Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied. SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: WOOD RODGERS, INC.| Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Thursday, September 1, 2022 10:58:58AM Project: \\woodrodgers.loc\ProductionData\Jobs\Jobs\8863_001_Carlsbad Tamarack\400_FunctionalUnits\480 Traffic\Models\Sidra\Carlsbad - Tamarack Signal.sip9 July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 321 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project Mobility Analysis Attachment F: MMLOS Reports July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 322 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project Mobility Analysis No Build Conditions – Existing July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 323 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes No * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 5 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?No No Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Blvd (North Leg) Redwood Ave Tamarack Ave Coastals 18,500 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 70 | C NB SCORE | LOS 70 | C SB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 324 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 8 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Blvd (North Leg) Redwood Ave Tamarack Ave Coastals 18,500 95 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 325 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?No No * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 6 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?No No Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Blvd (South Leg) Tamarack Ave Sequoia Ave Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 45 | F NB SCORE | LOS 55 | E SB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 326 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 4 2 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Blvd (South Leg) Tamarack Ave Sequoia Ave Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 327 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 5 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?No No Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Tamarack Ave (East Leg) Carlsbad Blvd Garfield St Neighborhood Connector 6,900 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 80 | B EB SCORE | LOS 80 | B WB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 328 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Tamarack Ave (East Leg) Carlsbad Blvd Garfield St Neighborhood Connector 6,900 95 | A EB SCORE | LOS 95 | A WB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 329 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?No No * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 5 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?No No * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?No No Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Blvd (Bridge Segment) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 45 | F NB SCORE | LOS 45 | F SB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 330 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 4 4 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Blvd (Bridge Segment) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 331 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project Mobility Analysis 3 & 4-Lane Alternatives Conditions - Existing July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 332 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes No Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (North Leg) Tamarack Avenue Redwood Avenue Identity (adjacent to residential) 18,500 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 95 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 333 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 2 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (North Leg) Tamarack Avenue Redwood Avenue Identity (adjacent to residential) 18,500 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 334 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 7 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 2 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (South Leg) Tamarack Avenue Sequoia Avenue Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 335 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (South Leg) Tamarack Avenue Sequoia Avenue Coastals 21,400 90 | A NB SCORE | LOS 90 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 336 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):6 6 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? Yes Yes Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Tamarack Avenue (East Leg) Carlsbad Boulevard Garfield Street Neighborhood Connector 6,900 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 337 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 7 7 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Tamarack Avenue (East Leg) Carlsbad Boulevard Garfield Street Neighborhood Connector 6,900 95 | A EB SCORE | LOS 95 | A WB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 338 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 11 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?Yes Yes Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment-3-Ln Alt) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 95 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 339 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 2 3 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment-3-Ln Alt) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 340 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):5 11 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:2 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)No No Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?Yes Yes Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment-4-Ln Alt) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 85 | B NB SCORE | LOS 95 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 341 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?Yes Yes Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 6 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 2 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment-4-Ln Alt) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 90 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 342 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project Mobility Analysis Roundabout Conditions - Existing July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 343 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 10 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'greater than 5' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (North Leg) Tamarack Avenue Redwood Avenue Identity (adjacent to residential) 18,500 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 344 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 8 7 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 3 3 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (North Leg) Tamarack Avenue Redwood Avenue Identity (adjacent to residential) 18,500 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 345 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):10 14 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (South Leg) Tamarack Avenue Sequoia Avenue Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 346 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 7 8 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 3 3 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (South Leg) Tamarack Avenue Sequoia Avenue Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 347 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction EB WB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):6 6 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?No No * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?Yes Yes Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?No No Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Tamarack Avenue (East Leg) Carlsbad Boulevard Garfield Street Neighborhood Connector 6,900 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A EB SCORE | LOS 100 | A WB SCORE | LOS May require improvements and upgrades to fully support CAP goals! X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 348 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction EB WB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):30 mph 30 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 5.5 6 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 0 0 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Tamarack Avenue (East Leg) Carlsbad Boulevard Garfield Street Neighborhood Connector 6,900 95 | A EB SCORE | LOS 95 | A WB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 349 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) PEDESTRIAN Roadway Direction NB SB * Do pedestrian crossings appear consistent with the CA MUTCD?Yes Yes * Minimum Sidewalk Unobstructed Width in Feet (Minimum ADA unobstructed width requirement is 4'):13 14 * Do sidewalks appear to meet ADA requirements (e.g., cross-slope and trip hazards)?Yes Yes * Do ramps and landings appear to meet ADA requirements?Yes Yes * Do the street light locations appear adequate?Yes Yes Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Number of Through Lanes:1 1 Are there 3 lanes or less to be crossed without pedestrian refuge? (Include turn lanes in count)Yes Yes Width (ft.) of landscaped buffer between pedestrian facility and vehicle travel way:0' to 2'0' to 2' Does on-street parking or a bike lane provide 6' or more buffer between pedestrians and vehicle travel way?Yes Yes Any apparent sight distance issues at intersections and pedestrian crossings?No No Are there any permanent speed control devices installed?No No Are there traffic calming measures that reduce crossing width (e.g., bulbouts, chokers, right-turn median island)?No No Do crosswalks appear to be high visibility?Yes Yes Are there intersection enhancements provided for pedestrians (e.g., pedestrian signal phasing, countdown heads)? No No Are there Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) at street crossings?Yes Yes Is there pedestrian scale lighting?No No Do active building frontages appear to be present on 80% of street curb line?No No Does the street furniture appear to be oriented towards businesses or attractions?No No Do the street trees appear to provide shade over more than 50% of the sidewalk length?No No Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 350 of 356 ROADWAY INFO Roadway Name From To Street Typology from Mobility Element _ Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume (2-way total) BICYCLE Roadway Direction NB SB * Do the roadway pavement conditions appear to be good (e.g., no pot holes)?Yes Yes * Does bike facility on roadway appear to be free of obstructions (e.g., drainage grates)? Yes Yes * Does the bicycle facility appear to meet MUTCD signing and striping design guidelines?Yes Yes Is on-street parking provided?No No Speed limit (miles per hour - mph):35 mph 35 mph Does the bikeway on the study segment and side streets meet and/or exceed the Bicycle Master Plan?Both Both Is there enhanced bicycle detection or video detection provided at intersections?No No Any bicycle racks are provided along segment?No No Bicycle Facility Provided:Bike Lane Bike Lane Lane Width (ft)Lane Width (ft) 8 8 Bicycle Buffer Width (ft)Bicycle Buffer Width (ft) 3 3 Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Bike lanes are striped continuously through the study segment? Yes Yes Carlsbad Boulevard (Bridge Segment) Sequoia Ave South End of Bridge Coastals 21,400 100 | A NB SCORE | LOS 100 | A SB SCORE | LOS X *Indicates an essential feature that strongly supports and promotes the goals identifed in the Climate Action Plan (CAP). July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 351 of 356 Final Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Pedestrian Improvement Project Mobility Analysis Attachment G: Collision Data July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 352 of 356 Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t / T r a f f i c & Mo b i l i t y D i v i s i o n Fr o m 1 / 1 / 2 0 0 8 t o 8 / 1 7 / 2 0 2 1 T o t a l C o l l i s i o n s : 1 5 4 4 4 2 5 I n j u r y C o l l i s i o n s : 1 2 F a t a l C o l l i s i o n s : 0 Te x t 1 Te x t 3 Te x t 4 Te x t 5 Te x t 8 Te x t 1 0 Te x t 1 1 Te x t 2 0 Te x t 2 1 Te x t 2 2 Cit y Te x t 6 Te x t 7 Te x t 9 Te x t 1 8 Te x t 1 9 Te x t 1 2 Te x t 1 3 Te x t 1 4 Pa r t y N o Pa r t y T y p e Dir o f T r a v e l Mo v e m e n t Ge n d e r Ag e Ve h T y p e So b r i e t y As s o c F a c t o r Sa f e t y E q u i p Sp e c i a l I n f o 15 - 0 5 9 5 5 8/1 9 / 2 0 1 5 11 : 3 5 We d n e s d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 13 7 ' Dir e c t i o n : S o u t h Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Un s a f e S t a r t i n g o r B a c k i n g 22 1 0 6 Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r No r t h Sto p p e d I n R o a d Ma l e Ag e : 2 4 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r No r t h Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Ma l e Ag e : 5 8 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 15 - 0 8 3 8 8 11 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 5 03 : 3 1 Sa t u r d a y RE D W O O D A V - C A R L S B A D B L 15 ' Dir e c t i o n : E a s t Da r k - S t r e e t L i g h t s Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Hit O b j e c t Fix e d O b j e c t Un k n o w n Hit & R u n : M i s d e m e a n o r Pr o p e r t y D a m a g e O n l y # I n j : 0 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r Ea s t Ma k i n g U T u r n No t S t a t e d Ag e : Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : I m p a i r m e n t N o t K n o w n As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d 16 - 0 2 0 4 4 3/2 6 / 2 0 1 6 09 : 0 2 Sa t u r d a y CA R L S B A D B L - R E D W O O D A V 20 ' Dir e c t i o n : N o r t h Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Un s a f e S p e e d 22 3 5 0 Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r So u t h Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Fe m a l e Ag e : 8 5 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r So u t h Sto p p e d I n R o a d Ma l e Ag e : 5 1 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 16 - 0 3 4 2 0 5/1 4 / 2 0 1 6 10 : 0 6 Sa t u r d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 0' Dir e c t i o n : N o t S t a t e d Da y l i g h t Clo u d y Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Tr a f f i c S i g n a l s a n d S i g n s 21 4 5 3 A Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r So u t h Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Fe m a l e Ag e : 2 6 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : I n a t t e n t i o n Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r Ea s t Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Ma l e Ag e : 6 1 Ve h T y p e : P i c k u p T r u c k So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 16 - 0 6 0 8 7 8/2 9 / 2 0 1 6 20 : 0 8 Mo n d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 3' Dir e c t i o n : N o r t h Da r k - S t r e e t L i g h t s Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Oth e r Bic y c l e Dri v i n g U n d e r I n f l u e n c e 21 2 0 0 5 Hit & R u n : N o Oth e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Bic y c l i s t So u t h Tr a v e l i n g W r o n g W a y Ma l e Ag e : 2 9 Ve h T y p e : B i c y c l e So b r i e t y : H B D U n d e r I n f l u e n c e As s o c F a c t o r : V i o l a t i o n No t S t a t e d Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r We s t Ma k i n g R i g h t T u r n Fe m a l e Ag e : 2 3 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d 16 - 0 6 7 3 8 9/2 5 / 2 0 1 6 20 : 3 1 Su n d a y TA M A R A C K A V - G A R F I E L D S T 0' Dir e c t i o n : N o t S t a t e d Da r k - S t r e e t L i g h t s Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Br o a d s i d e Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Tr a f f i c S i g n a l s a n d S i g n s 22 4 5 0 A Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r Ea s t Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Fe m a l e Ag e : 3 9 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r So u t h Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Fe m a l e Ag e : 3 4 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 17 - 0 3 7 9 1 6/1 3 / 2 0 1 7 02 : 0 0 Tu e s d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 40 0 ' Dir e c t i o n : S o u t h Da r k - S t r e e t L i g h t s Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Hit O b j e c t Fix e d O b j e c t Dri v i n g U n d e r I n f l u e n c e 23 1 5 2 A Hit & R u n : N o Oth e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r No r t h Oth e r U n s a f e T u r n i n g Fe m a l e Ag e : 2 0 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H B D U n d e r I n f l u e n c e As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d 17 - 0 5 6 4 4 9/2 / 2 0 1 7 18 : 0 0 Sa t u r d a y CA R L S B A D B L - S E Q U O I A A V 81 ' Dir e c t i o n : N o r t h Da y l i g h t Clo u d y Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Un s a f e S p e e d 22 3 5 0 Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 2 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r No r t h Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t Ma l e Ag e : 2 9 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r No r t h Sto p p e d I n R o a d Ma l e Ag e : 4 8 Ve h T y p e : P a s s e n g e r C a r So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 19 - 0 0 2 9 5 1/1 4 / 2 0 1 9 13 : 2 0 We d n e s d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 60 ' Dir e c t i o n : S O U T H Da y l i g h t Ra i n i n g Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Un s a f e S p e e d 22 3 5 0 Hit & R u n : Oth e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y # I n j : 3 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r NO R T H Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t F Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p B e l t U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r NO R T H Sto p p e d I n R o a d F Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p B e l t U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 3 Dri v e r NO R T H Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t F Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p B e l t U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 19 - 0 5 6 3 5 8/2 2 / 2 0 1 9 14 : 0 2 Th u r s d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 0' Dir e c t i o n : N o t S t a t e d Da y l i g h t Clo u d y Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Sid e s w i p e Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Im p r o p e r T u r n i n g 22 1 0 0 A Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r NO R T H Ma k i n g R i g h t T u r n M Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r NO R T H Ma k i n g R i g h t T u r n M Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : U n d e r D r u g I n f l u e n c e As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 19 - 0 6 0 0 0 9/8 / 2 0 1 9 08 : 4 5 Su n d a y CA R L S B A D B L - S E Q U O I A A V 57 ' Dir e c t i o n : S O U T H Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Sid e s w i p e Mo t o r V e h i c l e o n O t h e r R o a d w a y Im p r o p e r T u r n i n g 22 1 0 7 Hit & R u n : M i s d e m e a n o r Pr o p e r t y D a m a g e O n l y # I n j : 0 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r SO U T H Ch a n g i n g L a n e s No t S t a t e d Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : I m p a i r m e n t N o t K n o w n As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r SO U T H Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t F Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 20 - 0 3 8 1 2 6/2 7 / 2 0 2 0 09 : 3 6 Sa t u r d a y CA R L S B A D B L - S E Q U O I A A V 10 5 ' Dir e c t i o n : S O U T H Da y l i g h t Clo u d y Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Oth e r T h a n D r i v e r Hit & R u n : N o Oth e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r NO R T H Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t F Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : O t h e r La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r NO R T H Sto p p e d I n R o a d M Ag e : Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 21 - 0 0 3 1 3 1/1 3 / 2 0 2 1 16 : 4 5 We d n e s d a y TA M A R A C K A V - C A R L S B A D B L 79 ' Dir e c t i o n : E A S T Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Un s a f e S t a r t i n g o r B a c k i n g 22 1 0 6 Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r WE S T Ba c k i n g F Ag e : 6 3 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Un k n o w n No t S t a t e d Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r WE S T Sto p p e d I n R o a d F Ag e : 4 1 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d No t S t a t e d 21 - 0 1 7 5 6 3/1 8 / 2 0 2 1 18 : 1 1 Th u r s d a y CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V 33 ' Dir e c t i o n : S O U T H Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e Dri v i n g U n d e r I n f l u e n c e 23 1 5 2 ( a ) Hit & R u n : N o Co m p l a i n t o f P a i n # I n j : 1 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r NO R T H Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t F Ag e : 2 4 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H B D U n d e r I n f l u e n c e As s o c F a c t o r : V i o l a t i o n La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Dri v e r NO R T H Sto p p e d I n R o a d M Ag e : 5 6 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : H N B D As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e 21 - 0 3 6 3 7 5/3 0 / 2 0 2 1 18 : 3 0 Su n d a y RE D W O O D A V - C A R L S B A D B L 0' Dir e c t i o n : N o t S t a t e d Da y l i g h t Cle a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 In A r e a : C a r l s b a d R e d w o o d B r i d g e Sid e s w i p e Pa r k e d M o t o r V e h i c l e Im p r o p e r T u r n i n g 22 1 0 7 Hit & R u n : N o Pr o p e r t y D a m a g e O n l y # I n j : 0 # K i l l e d : 0 Pa r t y 1 Dri v e r EA S T Ma k i n g R i g h t T u r n M Ag e : 3 1 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : U n d e r D r u g I n f l u e n c e As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Pa r t y 2 Pa r k e d V e h i c l e WE S T Pa r k e d No t S t a t e d Ag e : 0 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : N o t A p p l i c a b l e As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d Pa r t y 3 Pa r k e d V e h i c l e WE S T Pa r k e d No t S t a t e d Ag e : 0 Ve h T y p e : So b r i e t y : N o t A p p l i c a b l e As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t No t S t a t e d Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 35 3 of 35 6 Co l l i s i o n S u m m a r y R e p o r t Ci t y o f C a r l s b a d Pu b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t / T r a f f i c & M o b i l i t y D i v i s i o n 7/ 2 5 / 2 2 Fr o m 8 / 2 1 / 2 0 2 1 t o 7 / 2 5 / 2 0 2 2 To t a l C o l l i s i o n s : 3 In j u r y C o l l i s i o n s : 1 Fa t a l C o l l i s i o n s : 0 CA R L S B A D B L & T A M A R A C K A V Pa g e 1 o f 1 21 - 0 7 7 4 1 11 / 1 9 / 2 0 2 1 09 : 3 0 Fr i d a y Re a r - E n d Pa r k e d M o t o r V e h i c l e CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V Dr i v i n g U n d e r I n f l u e n c e 27 ' Di r e c t i o n : S O U T H Pr o p e r t y D a m a g e O n l y # I n j : 0 # K i l l e d : 0 23 1 5 2 ( a ) Hi t & R u n : N o Da y l i g h t Cl e a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ag e : 5 6 M As s o c F a c t o r : V i o l a t i o n Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t So b r i e t y : H B D U n d e r I n f l u e n c Ve h T y p e : NO R T Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 5 CH E V R O L E T MA L I B U Pa s s e n g e r C a r , S t a t i o n W a g o n , J e e p Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e Ag e : 0 No t S t a As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t St o p p e d I n R o a d So b r i e t y : H N B D Ve h T y p e : NO R T Pa r k e d V e h i c l e Pa r t y 2 20 2 0 FO R D EX P L O R E R Pa s s e n g e r C a r , S t a t i o n W a g o n , J e e p 21 - 0 7 9 1 4 11 / 2 5 / 2 0 2 1 14 : 2 5 Th u r s d a y Re a r - E n d Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V Un s a f e S p e e d 13 ' Di r e c t i o n : S O U T H Pr o p e r t y D a m a g e O n l y # I n j : 0 # K i l l e d : 0 22 3 5 0 Hi t & R u n : M i s d e Da y l i g h t Cl e a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 No t S t a t e d Ag e : 0 No t S t a As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t So b r i e t y : I m p a i r m e n t N o t K n o Ve h T y p e : NO R T Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 19 9 9 MA Z D A PR O T E G E Pa s s e n g e r C a r , S t a t i o n W a g o n , J e e p Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ag e : 6 7 F As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t St o p p e d I n R o a d So b r i e t y : H N B D Ve h T y p e : NO R T Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 2 1 LE X U S RX 3 5 0 Pa s s e n g e r C a r , S t a t i o n W a g o n , J e e p 22 - 0 0 2 0 0 1/ 1 0 / 2 0 2 2 15 : 4 2 Mo n d a y Si d e s w i p e Ot h e r M o t o r V e h i c l e CA R L S B A D B L - T A M A R A C K A V Im p r o p e r T u r n i n g 18 1 ' Di r e c t i o n : N O R T H Ot h e r V i s i b l e I n j u r y # I n j : 2 # K i l l e d : 0 22 1 0 7 Hi t & R u n : N o Da y l i g h t Cl e a r Pt y a t F a u l t : 1 Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ag e : 2 8 F As s o c F a c t o r : V i o l a t i o n Pr o c e e d i n g S t r a i g h t So b r i e t y : H N B D Ve h T y p e : SO U T Dr i v e r Pa r t y 1 20 1 8 LE X U S RX 3 5 0 Pa s s e n g e r C a r , S t a t i o n W a g o n , J e e p Ce l l P h o n e N o t I n U s e La p / S h o u l d e r H a r n e s s U s e d Ag e : 6 5 M As s o c F a c t o r : N o n e A p p a r e n t Sl o w i n g / S t o p p i n g So b r i e t y : H N B D Ve h T y p e : SO U T Dr i v e r Pa r t y 2 20 0 4 LI N C O L N NA V I G A T O R Sp o r t U t i l i t y V e h i c l e Se t t i n g s f o r Q u e r y : St r e e t : C A R L S B A D B L Cr o s s S t r e e t : T A M A R A C K A V So r t e d B y : D a t e a n d T i m e Ju l y 18 , 20 2 3 It e m #1 0 Pa g e 35 4 of 35 6 Exhibit 5 Traffic & Mobility Commission Feb. 6, 2023, meeting minutes (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 355 of 356 Exhibit 6 Traffic & Mobility Commission May 1, 2023, meeting minutes (on file in the Office of the City Clerk) July 18, 2023 Item #10 Page 356 of 356 Proposed f iZ-~ SE~ TE() QISTRIBUTED DURING PUBLIC COMMENT AT COUNCIL MEETING OF 1 ltg/1)1, l\(.w\ *'~ Carlsbad Boulevard-Tamarack Avenue roundabout Steve Linke 7/18/2023 City Council meeting SUMMARY • Concerns -Safety (dangerous/injury crashes) -Operationa I (congestion/gridlock) Carlsbad Boulevard roundaboutc comparison State Street roundabout (9 year history) Proposed Tamarack Avenue roundabout VAK I r-,r,.,..rn,¢11 i 1-·-BUS STATION \ PULLOUT \ ----.... ...._ BUS STATION PULLOUT Would service about 70% more total traffic SAFETY CONCERNS • Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) -Analysis of crash data from police . reports {2015-2019) -Identifies safety improvements CITY OF CARLSBAD Local Roadway Safely Plan LRSP: State Street roundabout in top three intersection crash frequency Figure 2-2 High Collision Freq11e11ry Intersections H " b Fr~ u~ncy Collisions • 15-18 • 12 -14 0 10-11 School State St -----~ ---. ··a -----·-1 ~ .......,1\6 • i.___ ~r-. ror::ibout\ 0 }_::; I ~ "' v---,,... I _,e #' ' , I . 4 I '~ ~ \~ I " \ I ( \ \ ... 4 '----... \ 11s/a '·i • \ --- oe ,, I \ -:~ \ '\,_ c.....,.11# -f,J>•~ L --r.7 r.i----1 San ~~ • -~ L.!J MMCOS 1 \ {\., \ ., \ i . i -r. l ' p,(R/ECR PAR/~elrose ~ ...,,....,. ~i ,.,.. ~ . ,"' "'"' ,, . I, ~1\6 ' ~ :, ,_ i !. -' I Pa0llc" ... __ ~ J Lt¾,.. l I e,,"'°s_.~ C,,0 ... --. __ _j LRSP: State Street roundabout has highest intersection crash rate Table 2-5 Intersection Crash Rates car1sbad Boulevard & State Street Tamarack Avenue & Carlsbad Village Drive Signal 0.340 8 7 1 cansbad Boulevard & cerezo Drive Signal 0.337 9 4 1 1 1 2 Roosevelt Street & Carlsbad Village Drive Signal 0.285 7 2 1 Paseo Avellano & Calle Barcelona Signal 0.276 5 2 1 1 Washington Street & Carlsbad Village Drive Side Stop 0.274 6 1 3 1 State Street & Carlsbad Village Drive Signal 0.238 5 1 2 2 Monroe Street & Marron Road Signal 0.229 5 1 2 1 Harding Street & Carlsbad Village Drive Signal 0.209 8 3 1 1 Carlsbad Boulevard & Avenida Encinas Signal 0.188 5 1 2 1 1 4 1 2 1 3 .1 • ([ ) C n OJ a. -· OJ . CJ -< a. ~ 0 C :: : J a. OJ c-o C ,- + (/ ) Expansion of LRSP analysis for State Street and Tamarack Avenue intersections • LRSP: 2015 -2019 ➔ 5 years • Expanded analysis: May 2014 -June 2023 ➔ 9 years -State Street roundabout and Tamarack Avenue signal at Carlsbad Blvd -Same underlying data and methods Police report collision and injury severities • Crashes • Injuries -Less dangerous -Property damage only • Hit object • Sideswipe -Complaint of pain • Rear-end -Visible injury -More dangerous -Severe injury • Broadside -Death • Head-on • Overturn Crash/injury rates "'Sx higher at State Street roundabout Crashes/ Injuries Total collisions Dangerous Total injuries Visible Tamarack Ave (signal) 14 4 I ' 7 -- 3 ---,, Severe ,I 0 I! 1 Adjusted for traffic volume (May 2014-June 2023) 1i State St (roundabout) 40 11 18 - 10 -- 2 ii :1 - Higher rates at State vs. Tamarack1 4.9x 4.7x 4.4x ----- 5.7x 00 I I I I Rates excluding solo DUIs2 2.7x --. 2.6x 2.7x 3.4x 00 2 Solo DUI crashes at State Street roundabout included 7 injuries-4 of them visible -u ([ ) a. ([ ) V, r- + ., -· OJ :: J n 0 3 I ' 0 ., r- + " V, ( 1 QJ I I ' ( { ' ( ([ ) { r- + ( '' f -< n < n -· (I ) r- 1 - n 0 3 I ' 0 .. . . , r- 1 - .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (I ) QJ I ' ( • I m r- 1 - i '. f < { ( ( . OPERATIONAL CONCERNS 6 F~d;;;t Hign;;~; ~4.,,,-Administration • Road diet/single-lane roundabout capacities -16,000-20,000 vehicles per day -875-1,200 vehicles per hour (directional) City of Carlsbad Agenda #10 . f ~ E18-r•rfl~ V etGTRIBUTEO DURING PUBLIC COMMENT AT COUNCIL MEETING OF 1 j 1~ I z,~ \l!M±rlO Selecting Intersection Control for the Carlsbad Blvd and Tamarack Avenue Project Kris Wright Carlsbad resident July 17, 2023 OPERATIONAL CONCERNS 6 F~d;;;tHig;;~; ~..,. Administration • Road diet/single-lane roundabout capacities • 16,000-20,000 vehicles per day • 875-1,200 vehicles per hour (dir~ctional) Design Memorandum Carlsbad Bouleva1·d and Tamarark Avenue Intersertion LOS Analysis. Level of service: F Overall the poor operating conditions described above are due to the combination of decreased capacity and increased future 2035 volumes at this intersection. Based on industry standards, single- lane roundabouts typically operate poorly at conflicting/circulating volumes above 1200 vehicles per hour. Present day and future 2035 volumes substantially exceed this threshold. (. / ) . 0 C r- + -: : : s - 0- 0 C :: : J Cl . n QJ 1 -(. / ) 0- QJ Cl . OJ -< Cl . .. - - - . n C 1 1 (D :: : J r- t - .. . . . _ _ . . . Beach parking lot entra nee (current) l/ ) 0 C r- + ~ 0- 0 C :: : : J Q. n QJ -- . -l/ ' ) 0- QJ Q. CJ J -< Q. .. . - - . . . n C -- . -- . (D :: : : J r- + .. . _ _ . , l/ ) 0 C r- + :: : r 0- 0 C :: : 5 0. . . . n OJ 7 -V> 0- OJ 0. . . . OJ -< 0. . . . .. . - - . . . 7 0 C ( :: ) . \ ( .· 0. . . . . ' OJ f ( 0- '. f 0 C r- + '- - " " ' From the Traffic Dept. video -~,,-, I'~~~ Unbalanced entry from Carlsbad Blvd vs. Tamarack Ave • Example during peak hours • 88% on Blvd/12% on Tamarack • Averages about 80%/20% Therefore drivers during rush hours from arteriole streets may have limited access to the roundabout ·. Traffic Sign a I Program at Traffic Management Center • Links traffic signals to a centralized computer system • Remotely accesses Traffic Signals and can adjust for high volumes of traffic • As of 2013, the City of Carlsbad has connected 130 traffic signals within the City to the Traffic Management Center and approved an additional $1.75M to purchase and install additional equipment. r ·p-~Cityof Carlsbad California Conclusion Updating and keeping the Traffic signalization on the Tamarack x Carlsbad Blvd intersection is: 1. Safer for pedestrians 2. Will allow for smoother flow of traffic as indicated by two City C.onsultants 3. Congestion at this intersection will limit the capability of the traffic circle to provide even traffic flow if a roundabout is installed. . . *Please keep the traffic signals at Tamarack and Carlsbad Blvd. * Tom Frank, Transportation Director, City Engineer Lauren Ferrell, Associate Engineer July 18, 2023 Selecting intersection traffic control for Carlsbad Blvd and Tamarack Ave 1 RECOMMENDED ACTION 1.Authorize staff to move forward with the environmental review, permitting and final engineering design for a roundabout at the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Or 2.Authorize staff to move forward with the environmental review. permitting and final engineering design for a traffic signal at the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue ITEM 10: CARLSBAD BLVD AND TAMARACK 2 3 4 PROJECT OPPORTUNITIES Add safety features Manage speeding Create more parking Reduce traffic congestion Reduce air pollution ITEM 10: CARLSBAD BLVD AND TAMARACK 5 PROJECT OPTIONS Option 1: A roundabout Option 2: A traffic signal 6 ITEM 10: CARLSBAD BLVD AND TAMARACK 6 77 Option 1 -Roundabout 8 Option 1 -Roundabout 9 Option 2 –Traffic signal 10 Option 2 –Traffic signal 11 12 CAUSES OF SEVERE COLLISIONS IN CARLSBAD July 2017 to March 2023 13 CAUSES OF FATAL COLLISIONS IN CARLSBAD 14 July 2017 to March 2023 15 INTERSECTION SAFETY ITEM 10: CARLSBAD BLVD AND TAMARACK 16 ITEM 10: CARLSBAD BLVD AND TAMARACK 17 ROUNDABOUT SAFETY Reduction in injuries 67% 90% Reduction in fatalities 35% Reduction in all crashes STATE STREET ROUNDABOUT ITEM 10: CARLSBAD BLVD AND TAMARACK 1818 1/3 Less distance to cross each time 19 2020 AVERAGE SECONDS TO GET THROUGH INTERSECTION 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Roundabout Traffic signal Existing AM peak PM peak Saturday peak 57% Reduction in wait time 21 EMERGENCY RESPONSE ITEM 10: CARLSBAD BLVD AND TAMARACK 22 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK ITEM 10: CARLSBAD BLVD AND TAMARACK 23 NEXT STEPS •Complete environmental review, permitting and final design •Present final design to Traffic & Mobility Commission (mid-2025) •Request City Council approval of plans and authorization to bid •Construction anticipated late 2025 –late 2026 ITEM 10: CARLSBAD BLVD AND TAMARACK 24 RECOMMENDED ACTION 1.Authorize staff to move forward with the environmental review, permitting and final engineering design for a roundabout at the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue Or 2.Authorize staff to move forward with the environmental review. permitting and final engineering design for a traffic signal at the intersection of Carlsbad Boulevard and Tamarack Avenue ITEM 10: CARLSBAD BLVD AND TAMARACK 25 29 Animation –roundabout with peds 31 North