The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1981-07-08; Planning Commission; ; CUP 198 - CITY HALL EXPANSIONSTAFF REPORT DATE: July 8, 1981 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: CUP 198 (City Hall Expansion) Request for a twofold conditional use permit to allow construction of: 1) tem- porary modular office structures to be located in and replace the rear Carlsbad C1v1c Center parking lot, and 2) a paved parking facility located on a thrulot between Laguna Drive and Stratford Lane immediately to the north of the Carlsbad Civic Center. I. BACKGROUND ANO PROJECT DESCRIPTION This item was previously considered and approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting of June 10, 1981. However, staff inad- vertently failed to notify the surrounding property owners of the public hearing on June 10, 1981, thereby necessitating the re- scheduling of the item at this time. The proposed project involves two separate permits: first, the construction of temporary modular office structures totaling approximately 3,538 square feet to be located to the rear of the Carlsbad Civic Center in the area that is presently utilized as a parking lot for police vehicles, immediately east of the Police Department offices. The office structures will constitute a tem- porary relocation of two city departments and will be designed and landscaped to aesthetically compliment the present permanent facilities. The Civic Center is located in an R-P-Q zone and, as such, the proposed use is permitted in conjunction with the issuance of a conditional use permit or site development plan. The second permit is for the construction of a paved parking lot located on a .77 acre thrulot to accommodate approximately 70 vehicles. Access to the parking lot will be from Laguna Drive only and the applicant will relinquish rights of access to Strat- ford Lane~ The property is zoned R-1-7500 and is used primarily for agricultural purposes w,th a small, single-family house loca- ted in the north-west corner of the lot. The proposed temporary facility is allowed, contingent upon the issuance of a conditional use permit under Section 21.42.010 (J) which provides for "accessory public and quasi-public utility buildings and fac111t1es" in all zones 1nclud1ng residential. The proposed temporary facility is allowed, contingent upon the issuance of a conditional use permit under Section 21.42.010 {J) which provides for "accessory public and quasi-public utility buildings and facilities" in all zones including residential. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1) Do the proposed uses meet the required findings for a Conditional Use Permit? Discussion The proposed site for the temporary office structures is the most centrally-located yet inconspicuous area of the Civic Center. Additionally, there is sufficient room in this area to accommo- date the planned buildings. The necessity for the structures is brought about by the increased growth rate of development in the city which is accompanied by the need for an expanded City Hall. The usual impact of the buildings will be minimized by color and design treatment as well as landscaping. The structures will be compatible with the existing City Hall buildings. The decrease in the present number of parking spaces will be more than off-set by the additional temporary parking lot across the street from this site. The proposed site for the temporary paved parking lot is a rec- tangular thru-lot, as shown on exhibit "B", and will only take access from Laguna Drive to minimize the effect of numerous vehi- cles upon the residential neighborhood of Stratford Lane. Addi- tionally, along the side-lot lines, a 6-foot view-obscuring fence will be installed, with all parking lot lights directed away from any adjacent properties to minimize any impacts upon the sur- rounding neighborhood. As the project is temporary in nature, the setbacks may be reduced in this case. Staff feels, however, that a minimum five-foot landscaped setback on all sides is de- sirable and has conditioned the permit to accomplish this. Any other areas on the property that are not actual parking spaces, including the Laguna Drive and Stratford Lane setbacks, are to be heavily landscaped. Staff has found that the requested temporary uses are necessary and desirable for the development of the community, are essen- tially in harmony with the various elements of the General Plan, and, as conditioned, are not detrimental to existing or future uses in the zone. Further, the sites are adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed uses, all of the yards, set- backs, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to surrounding uses will be provided and maintained, and the traffic system serving the proposed uses is adequate to properly handle all forseeable traffic generated. -2- r III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and therefore has issued a Nega- tive Declaration on May 8, 1981. IV. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Resolution No. 1814, APPROVING CUP-198, based on the findings and subject to the con- ditions conta1ned therein. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 1814 2. Location Map 3. Background Data Sheet 4. Exhibit "A", dated June 2, 1981 5. Exhibit "B", dated June 2, 1981 6. Environmental Documents 3 . . .. 71 L -AP. _P.~oPo~~D . Pl\ R. J!. I JJ G u,r _f?_8P_Po_$~D JV\Qt>\/ L-t\R _S'f'RV~--f V RC AR,.~A _-;; --....... -..... .. --UACKGROUND DA'l~ S[fEET ---- At>I'LlC/\:n': City of Carlsbad -----,.------ RI->~~E.51' ~'\ND 11..X:.Yl'IO~!: .cons.t.J::.~odulur o-Ffice-structure and a pa:i::Jdng lot on.property generally located on the north and south side of Laguna Drive b.e.tw.e_e.n....lio._ Pi co Drhre ~nd Elmwood Street. • • (for modular buildings): A 'portion of Tract 117 of Carls zz::-;~ DEOCR1:J?,.1'IOi.~: b.a,d Lands..,.. accarrHng to U.ap .thereof No. 1661, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, March 1, 1915; also knc as asse§sors parcel number l 56-180-34. Caee .bo:tt.QIIL.fo.r.:. park·j ng lot}* • 77· ac. 3.85 ac, __ 1=5_6--J_B0 __ -~3~4,_ __ 156 164 23 of Lots 1 (parking lot) and -1 (structures) , GENEIU\L PL.'!\N ~m ZONil:G Go...neral Plan L,;7..,tl Use Designation _G_-/.._R_L_M ____ _ • Density lulaved --------0-4 Density Proposed N/A -------- ~isting Zon~ __ R_-_P_-_Q_/_R_-_l ______ _ Proposed zone N/A ----------- Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: .... - Zoning • • Structures • ·Parking Nor.th R-1 R-1 • South R-P::0 • East _R-~ West. R-P-0 P-R-Q :R-1 R-1 Land 0Use • 'Structures • Parking • R-XM R-IM o. ___ _ G G ____ R-IM G ____ R-rn .PUBLIC FACILI~~ES Sc:~:.cl Distri-::t. Carlsbad ~..;.=~;;.;;...,;;,;....:.;.. ____________ _ Water Distric~ Carlsbad Carlsbad EDU's • --------------------------------- Public Facilities Pee l\grcc:u~nt, date.cl _______________ ;.___ ------· --... - . .,. . ..Yes .. _ N:::~1:1 Live D:!clar.u l:ion, inmK!d _May:.._8._, __ .l9_8 ].__ __ Le>:] i~a. C.IIE.::J..9.8-_____ _ J::.1.R. Ccirti.ficd, cbhxl • ........ -. --···------·-------·---· OU101· 1 -----.......... _ ... _________ ----·----·-•--•------·· ... ___ ···-··---.. ----·-··· --····-----····-··--* legal description for parking lot: All that portion of the Northwes· one quarter Section 6, Township 12 South, Range 4· West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of Calif~ ( ----------.---1-------- -POLICE DEPT, 1,800¢± • {TENT.) r--7--7---7 ··r--r--r --7 / / / / / / // / / / / // / / / . / . /· / / /.._...,._/ ______ __,_---" / . / / ~/ ___ _,/ ~/ ,/ / I POLICE OEPl: I PLAA.INING. I DEPT. -I J,800fl±(TE!VT.) I· --'-~-----~ --------------_j £lJGIN££RIN6 AND • PLANNING DEP7:S. .. ' ·:·:.-·'£. ·' . AOMINISTRATl'OA OFFICES FUTURE CONF. Al?eA r - Oty of Ccrkbt.i 1 . Planning C001rnil$b.~ ~ ~,ue ... 198- ~""w No. A • Oda -'l~fe, - • -J~<:;:.:.:~_V,:;,.~, :::""r°"'·_,:----- •.• ., ~,:.._,f, ,, ... !"If, •••• , ,., ,tio I.,;.. ', ..... ,, ' .. f V'/(;,\~';,? f,.'. ,~{,,:-..:. •~•~:,;••~·•,0··,: ~ ., '~· ': ' : <· ' ' .• ' • ...... .' .•: ,' ' STR;):.JTFO/?D ! ---• >·--~ ···.·i·.-;-. -•. : .•:.::::.:•-~-, .. ! . ... ... .:.• .... -' . ·--- LPLVF . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. -· .. . - : .. : . IC-,5. 14' • ~ +..~. -~--~-~-~--~-. -~--~ .. ~-· ~----~--:.......:·~--=·~-~.,,a ...... _ ....... ,, ...... --·-----.:.-;., . ' . • .. . . ..• ;· ' . . -. ~. ... . . • . ;. ........ -~ . : .. ,: t-f •. • ta:f/ City· ~f C<'>tl.b...--d· '~ ' . . . .. I ;:-~nm?:~* .. -. .. . {-1: ··'" .. ·' --... . . . I,. •. . •. ··•.·l~a~. t~~()f>-lq0_ • . I t"Xhibit No .... 8.. _ · • • . : • • ..• -· • 1).11~. -'. ... €:Lr:.-h-u__ • I • . ' ' . ' . . ... . ' • • . ·1 ! ·;;:. .. ' ··.~. . '.: -:-----·....:_ • • .. ) • :~t -:- ,, ------·--· 4~ ••• .. .. . . ~ i · .5'9' _ . . • -~: :. ~··: /~ . , l · - .:~ . -1/)~.~ -~1~ /t ~~,-~ ,t· . . ... ·?;:~/ ,,. I; • --.;~ ~ ~ ~ ~=: --:·:: ..... ,.. ,:: . --~ --.... :_~;~~ LAGU!VA · ..... · · DRIVE • • I • . . . . -------------·-. ·--· .. ~--------. : ,;,---__ --------------. "' 1/1/"_--------~ =-.::::=::'.::: __ ::-:: __ =:_:-..-:_::-:: __ ::::_:::::::_-:-:: ___ ::::: __ =---=-=--=':"'.'.'::".==========,::::✓----~ : _____________ --; ---~STR A T FORµ_ ' .•, .· i L /JAi£ r----7 I L_T ! £Xl.5T I 1_/?ES. : L ___ _J / _3 z ., i :j ii :I SCALE : I_,, ::: 40' _,_ -t ,_ .... .,. . •. . : I Fh~ $100.00 RECEIPT NO: . ,_ i ------ ·, 'ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -Part I (To be Completed by APPLICANf) CASE NO: ------- Applicant:· et7Y. ti~-t?A'/t.l.ftlA() Address of Applicant: • /,Z,.~t) ·£ltn /hi(: {A-,u.S/!M) 1 69. 9 ,_,ct;Y Phone Number: C1I</) 1./]J':, ~£'4/ . DATE:· 3/3/rl Name, address and p~o~e number of person to be contacted· (if other than Applicant): • "GENERAL INFORMATION: Description of Project: / •. /11()/)(/LFlt( • .s-nev~ /H"P/Z.l»Y~El.-'f 901 BY M 1 1AI .51~£ Fill-Prr,u-vsE /A/ CAet.S~A{) '""'CE ,{)£Pc e~it1N~ur, • • "]., ~At/E() Plt/Zl{IAIIY t{)r 4'Ai , ?7 Ac,€£ T() (A/lftC# ~tf:t:€.111-r. 3_8~ /'YIAV /JG' /!}()()FD. 7TJ /NC-'2EA:SG" tor 5/~. . ·, Project LocationfAddress:· &aeul S%12E Vt61/Ald .J)t?, 7ltt?~l/6H ZP •• S1MT6»?./> LA/11/F /Je1vflfiiiAI lo/0 f'IC'2 AN!> ~ $7;" • Assessor Parcel Number: /~~ ~ • /6'(_ -• AA ~'31~ Zone of Subject Property: _.R_-_l_-_?. ____ '.S4_(:)_o_,_,_~_-_-P_-__ 9 __________ _ . Proposed Use of Site: /?.l'[v'F/J ,e:1111'<.~/Altr ~r J /'>'U)/)1/tA/e Q:194£ i List all other applicable applications related to this project: ,,v/tJ I ------ ND1 EIR 1 •. 2. I Describe the 2.ctivity area, inciuding distinguishing natural and mamr.ade charact2ristics;. also provide precise _slo:pe analysis when appropriate. • • 1. J11tJl)</l..-M QrF1cE snevc}rv~ "lD ."BE BeECTEIJ dN 8'1sr141tf-, . . . . 1W<K-1N~ ur. . . • . • . •. • . · .-· 2,, /'A:Rta/116-ti;r ,Ate,/F /?tzi:slf"NTLY mi-teF,i:) Pi~ A-6R1cu4-vcF W/rH 0/Vt S,rl/ht-S/A/~U r,1-,vJ ICY /lt)l)S~ ()Ill tr .. 7111.S PIL-~1?1:Jer¥ s~,oEs 6E¥n,Y 7D~ ~ JAES.,... A"'o St>tf7il. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into · ... t.he design and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific discussion of" energy conservation requirements see of the City's EIR Guidelines). If residential, include the number of units,· schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. . . ~ . • .. 5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city OL regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, 6. ,.. 7. . c...;1d loading f acil.j. ties. ·• If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shif~, and loadi~g facilities . .. : ,44· -~ . If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employreent per shift, estimated occupancy, leading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the ~ project. .. I . . . /YIO/)//L/11"< OFFICE' 5--rlUle,TV/l/!" . 77) . /31f'. 1/rl 1-l'c~IJ. F4n.:.. :·;;,11/ . GdvtF-';Al_hlG'/Vr t:?Pr1c-~s q,1111-1 u:-ss "11-11."W so • • f)ttF/iS.OIVS f-?G'te.. /J/W. dCCA//:?A,,1/c.y. t~rn~cJN ,-ry SG_ltl•F'rr> ·# /!,f; ltnPµv,IJ ~t/lr~IVm~l\lr_ /)(Ff,?;lf1ern,J;ZV7~ rf//VC Tld.lV/ IV 6-'. • • • . . • I. \ . ) ENVIRONMENTAL "Il\-IPACT P~NALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked yes. Attach additional sheets as necessaryl. • YES NO . . . . 1) Could the project significantly change presept ·v 9Iand uses i~ the vi9inity of t~e_activity? I' 2) Could the activity affect the use of a rec- . reational area,· or area of important aesthetic value? ____ -'f... 3) Could the activity affect the functio:ning of an.established community or neighborhood? __ X Could the activity result in the displacement • of community residents? _:i,_ 5) Could the activity increase the number of low -and moderate cost housing units in the city? ___ X .. 6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the cit7? 7) 8) Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity areq uniqu~, that ~s, not· found in other parts of the County, State, or Nation? Could the activity significantly affect a historical or archaeological site or.its settings? 9) ·could the activity significantly affe·ct the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce-natural resource? • -10)· Does-the activity ~rea serve as a habiti-lt, food source nesting place, source·of water, etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish • .species? 11) .·could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? ·12) 13) -: ·~e there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area?, Could the activity change existing features ·of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or tidelands? • ... , . ..... ... . .·. ... ... X )( X , . • • -- .. 14) c6uld the activity change existing features of any of the city's beaches? ·1s) Could· the activity result in the erosion or el-i:mination of agricultural lands'? .16)" '··· Could the activity serve to encourage develop~ ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify ·development of already developed areas? 17). Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc)? 18) ~ Will the activity require ·certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any .local, state er federal environmental control agency? 19.) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by·the city? 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, _or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? 21) .Will the activity involve construction of tacilities in a flood plain? 22) Will the activity invclve construction of ·facilities on a slope of 25 percent :-Jr grea."ter? 23) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? 24)" .-25) 26) Could t~e act1vity result in the generation of s~gni.fica11t amounts of noise?. Could the activity result in the generation of significant a·moun1:s of. dust? • Will the a.ctivity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other m~terials? 27) Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the .region's air or water resources? (Should note, s~rfa9e, ground wa~er, off-shore). 28) -. Will the project substantially incrcnse fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc·.)? 29) .Wi.11 there be a.significant change to existing land form? • # X X X. -x x X X .. :.. x ·-x X ·)( • .. ' ! (a) indicate ·estimated grading to be done in cubic yards /111/t(l[YIA-L- (b) percei1tage of alteration to the· present land form . MINI fll\A1- · .. {c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes . •. 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases in -the use of utilities, sewers_, _drains, or streets? ____ X 31) Is the activity carried out as part of a iarger project or series of projects? • • X · .. .. • -s-- . . • ·, • ) II. STATEMENT OF NQN.:SIGNIFICANT .Bl"VIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the que~tions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant envirornnental effects, indicate your reasons below: • ,. I/) d,4/F tia1DIFN7 v./e>lli.J) flhl!E 7D Jt-G"UJCME. 7D -~I'£ /(,r;l)M Ftdi. P/rfll{,,t/Vlr' ur. . • 19 //hfl/LJAJG-·UJ-r /~ "':'"J.V t'l-&/l/e,ui-nl£t ~ I/NI) 1,4/dUI,/) ~ NO tbtvfflt . 1-9} C.f/.p. ~t11/J61J. _ 3~ Ph> /'~CT' I~ ,7,q,,z.,-dP /lrJo/'TIOAl/11, l}J;"VEUh,t,~NT IJF C~A-IJ uv,c Cfi"N~te.. (If additional space is needed for answering any questions attach additional sheets as may be needed). Date Signed· • 3b/s I --'-7-_,,,_ ________________ _ . ' ' • ''JWVII!O;~•-lfa~f.1\L JNPACT ASSESS~IENT rom,I -Part II (To Re Complt>ted Ry TI1e Pl.ANNING DEPAini!ENf) -'CASE NO. --------- • I. BACKGROl1011) 1. APPLICANT: ~,iy oi:' e,9;l.~.iAt) 2. . • _ADDRESS A'."D PHO~'E 1'..11.J~IBER OF APPLIC/\i\11': DATE: -~/3/3-1 . , r ------- ------------- 3. DATE 0-IECKLIST SUB)UTfED: • ·3/_:a/8'/ ••••••• --,"--'-· ---------------- . ............... . .. IL • "ENVJR0}oll:?-ffAL D!PACTS tEXPLNv\'f:fO.\S OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE A~Si\'ERS ARE TO BE WRITTEN UNDER Sect.ion III -DISCUSS~_DN OF DWIR0X'-1ENTAL EVALUXTION) ·Yes • "Maybe 1. • T~11·th Wi.11 the proposal have signi- ficant n~sults in: • • a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substruct.ures? ..... ·····X . b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcoveri!}g of the soi1? c. • Change :in topography or ground surface relic£ £caturcs? d. The dcstn1:::tj cm,. covering or : modification of any unique geologic· or· physical feat"llrcs? e. Any :incrc~sc in wind or \\'atcr erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Chan,r.cs in clc-position or ero- sion of hc-:1ch sands, or ch:mr~cs • in siltation7 t:C'position or erosion ,1hich m:1)" moll i fr the ch:.nncl of a river or ~tre:i~:i or 1.hc hcd of the ~ccan or :my h:ir • inlet or lake? ........ ... · x .. . . .. . . 2. Air: Will thC? proposal have signr/70rµ, results in: a. • Air emissions or dct.crio1~ation of ambient air quality? b. TI1e creation of obj ec_tionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement: mosit.ure or temperature, or any • change in clj.J11atc, either lqcally _ . or regionally? 3. Water: Will the proposal have s1g1- Iicant results in: ·a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water move- ments, in ei th2r marine or fresh ' • waters? b. Changes jn absorption rates, • drainage patten1s, or the rate and • amount of surface water 11.llioff? c. Alter;--:.tions to the course or flvw of flood watcTs? d .. • Change in the runount of sur- face ·water in any \\'ater body? e, Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface .:water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved o:x.11gcn or turhidi ty? f, Alteration of the d:ircction or -rate of flow of .groun~ waters? g. Change in the quantjty of •• ground waters, either through • clircct ndditions or w:ith<lrawals, or through int.erccpUon of an aquifer by <;uts or excavations? h. Rcducti on· in tl;c runount of . water othcn-Jj se nvailablc for 11ublic water suppUcs? .. , .. Yes Maybe No X X .. ·X ----X ··X -x .. ··X· • 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal .J1ave sign.i- 13.cant results in: • a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, rnicroflora and aquatic plants)? b .. Reduction of the numbers of any \miquc, .rare or endangered • species of plants? • c. Introduction of new species .•of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d ... Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? S.. • ·Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in: a, Changes in the diversity·of species, or numi:iers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- fish, bcnthic organisms, insects or micro fauna)? b. Reduction of the· nrnnbers • of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? · · c. Introduction of new species • of ani1na ls in to an area, or rcsul t jn a barrier to the migration or movement of anjmals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife 11:ibitat? 6, • "Noi~c. Will the proposal sir.ni- Iicantly increase existing noise levels? 7. • -~ht nncl G~::irc. Will the pro- posal sji~ujfjcantJy produce new light or r,l:irc? 8. Lnml Use. ·Will the proposal have si,!niOcant results in the nlteraUon of the JWesent or planned land use of nn nrca? . . ·Maybe No x X -_x_ X·· ·- .• 9. Natural I~csotn-ccs. Will the pro- posal have signir-icant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of.any natural resources? . . b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset~ Docs the proposal involve a significant risk of an • CA'}Jlosion or the release of haz- ardous substances (including, but ·not limited to, oil, pesticides, • ·' chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? "ii. •. ·p9puI~tion. Will. the proposal • • significantly alter the location.,· ' . distribution, dcnsi ty, or growth ·rate of the human population of ap area? 12. Housing. Will the vroposal signi- :ficantfy affect existing housing, or create a dcm::ind for additional housing? 13. • ·rransportatio:n/Circulation. Will · the proposal have significant re-· sults in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b, Effects on existing parking • facilities, or demand .for new parking? c,· Impact upon existing trans- }lC>rtation systems? • d, Altcrntions to present patterns of circulation or move- ment of people and/or goods? c, Al tcrations to waterborne, rail or air. traffic?· • • • • J\ Incrc::isc jn trnffic }1~2.ir<ls to 111otor vehicles, bicyclists or pcdcstrfans? .· Yes ~ybc No . ·--- --- .... • .. x x ····X -.. · X --- -\ -.. · X --- .. .·. .. · • 14. Ptibl ic Services. Will the pro- posal have a significant effect upon, or have significant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the follmving areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational •·:facilities? .• e~ · Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? f. Other governmental services? · • ' 15. Eliergy. Will the "proposal have s_igniTicant results in: a .. Use of substantial amounts of · fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or.require the develop- ment of new sources of energy? . . .,. . .;-. 16. ··utilities. Will the proposal have' significant results in the need for n·cw systems, or alterations to the following utilities: .. a. Power_ or natural_ gas7 b, Communications sy~tcms? . ' c, Water? -d. Sewer or septic tanks? e._ Stonn water drain~1gc? f, Solid wa·stc and di;;posal? 17,. ·11lll11:m llmltli. Will the-proposal ha,,c-si'ri11~Tc:1nt resuJ ts in the crraU01~ o1~ :my heal th h:1.zard or potent bl he;!] th ha:~anl (~xclmVing ,nental hc;i1th); .. .· Yes -·~ybc_ No : X )( )( X ·x ·x . • • ····X .· . • .. i. .... : ···x . ' ... ... X: ..... ... )( ...... .. "X ..... . .. " .. . .. )( .. ',. Yes ·Maybe No 18. Acsthctjcs. Will the proposal have s1gni:fjcant results in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vist3 or view open to the public~ or wil 1 the pro-. posal result in the crc3tion of an • aesthetically offcns~_ve site open to public view? . . ·X 19. Recreation. Will-the proposal have s1.gnificant rcsul ts in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing re~reational opportunities? 20. Archeological/IIistoTical. Will the , proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant • archcological or historical site, • structure, object or building? 21. ANALYZf VJABLE .t\1,TIR\!:'\TIVES TO TI?E PROPOSED PROJFCT SUCH AS: a) PHASED D1.'V1:L01_);,JI:\T 01: 11iE · PROJECT; b) AL'!lR\li\TT~ SITE DESIGNS; c) ALITR'\/\TE SCALE OF DEVELOP;-!G,;T; d) ALTER~'.ATE USES FOR 1HE SIIT:; e) DEVELOi1~1E\JT AT .S0?-1E Hfl1JRE TH!E RATi-~ER TIii\.~ NOW; f) ALTERNATE srn~s FOR Tiffi PROPOSED USE; g)-i'~O PROJECT ALTERNATIVE. • .. . ' ·. X .. .,. . .,,., -. .. 22. ~11\NDAT0RY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFIG\~CE. a) OOES TI IE PROJECT HAVE TI IE P01l:N- TIAL TO DEGPv'\DE 'fl TI3 QUALin· OF 'IlIE ENVIR0;-;.\1ENT, OR CURTAIL TIIE • DIVERSITY IN 'HIE ENVIR0N\lENT? b) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE TI-IE POTEN- TIAL TO ACHIEVE SB0RT-TERJ.I, 10 'Il-IE DISADVAi\'TJ\GE OF L0~G-'fER.i\1, ENVIR0l'\'?-iENTPJ .. GOALS? (A SH0RT- 'fEPJ\1 IMPACT 0~ 1HE ENVIR0~\lm'T IS ONE \\1-IIOf OCCURS IN A RE- LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE PERIOD OF TIME MULE LO~G-1ERM IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL INTO • THE HJTLJRE. ) · c)_ . DOES TI-IE PROJECT H'\VE IMPACTS . \\1-IICH NIB INDIVIDUALLY LIJ\IITED, • ' • BUT rurulATIVELY COXSIDERABLE? (A PROJECT i'-i\Y HIPACT ON 1WO ·OR MORE SEPARATE RESOURCES l\liERE 'HIE U fl) ACT 0:-J E l\.0-f RE- •. SOURCE 1s· IttL\TIV£LY S--1-\LL, BUT l\1 !ERE 11-U~ EFFECT OF TI-IE 'IDTAL OF 1H0SE H-IPACTS ON THE ENVIR0;\i'-Ib~T IS SIG~IFICANT.) d) DOES 'TIIE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON- MENTAL EFFECTS l;lJI CH WILL • · CAUSE SUBSTA1\J'fIAL ADVERSE · • • • EFFECTS ON Ill]\i;\i\J BEINGS, EI'1llER DIRECTLY OR INDIRf:CTLY? Yes Maybe No .x ·X . . . . . .-.. X -- III.· LISCUSSION OF ENVIR0;\1\IE\FfAL EVALUTION . . ~ (),tof,sef) /JfJJ)f€G-r 1Nv,t-vri's. ~ ~r1A1<r •. ~ A-fYIPIJlltAil ~Pt~-~ ~~1.1t:-r~ ltPl'/M')l;Wl~y j~ 1 ~ to I /N Sit£. IN C17Y ~-c/bH;s~ CIYIC ·~£/'/~. . . f /lrl{?/Nb-ti r. /(it() . IIV~P~ -~N_. '1}11$' /'~~er Wit../..,, ~r ~-~ll/t/J7tvtr ol I}. f)ll1ZK.-IN6-t-trr At:4tOSS. 1.,t6()NA- . . . A1/~NLIG rltlM. ~ ~~P~S€.P· /l;i()IJVU'f/2.. S7ll-ve.TV/<£. 'llb5 ~MIJ 1£ _f,'ti,gerv,z:,y vrtt.,1u:-t>· n:Jt<.. Me1cv~w;u;=. A @#l)1T10NA1..,_ v.se-/?tr1ur11r ,s .µiprlflUflJ r.t/l(_ 7lb.s .. . ,l: JJISCUSSJON ~F E\VIRO~J,lf:NTAL ill'ALUATTON (Continued) . . .. · f tUn:'Cr, • • ... '1'}I(;" /?ffl!.¥-IA/1:r ~-r l! ~ ~ /:3{/t<,T ON . 77AC-~ (/,:, tlV'ID IA/✓1H /f· ~()S.$/B/tl7Y iF' 17/Ar. 8e~ /NC~~c~ f>'( ,~8 Aa,t .. · 1}}f; .f?~Gtf l,ul'-f'-~,II~ 1,7'11/1/iw,,:tc. 61(/J(J1).I'-AIVJ)· stftjvllJ • ~e;r /10v~€iy ~r • SVl<~·(//111)/#lr .PW~~~ l/,IHJC:lf: • LS. P/f:1'1" /j,t,/ Ly . t~w Xif/slry ~s-1~..rt, Gxc.t";::r r-::iJ~_-e,111~ eF~ _ · 11-h.i. · New · t'flll/~ M~ ~~~t;, ior • c~·il_t../) ' . • • . . -#a..t? ~,i1,~ ·auv~i!!FJ,10// 11V , fAI /)'/e,Gq.-Pf,'!'r, .s • • :lit?~i:/V/V/.·~11115£5'~ ~ -• . . . . . ... .... ' . . . . ; • •. .. . . . -----. . '· . -..... •' .. • IV. DETERMJNJ\TION. (TO BE CQ\1PLETED BY 1lIE PLt\i~ING DEPAR1NG\i'T) On the basis of this initial evaluation: .X.. ·1 find the proposed project COULD !\"OT have· a significant • effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECU\IV\TION will be prepared. • I find that although the proposed project couJ;d have a significant effect on the environment, there will not he a significant effect in this case because the mitigation ,neasures described on an attached sheet have been adcled to the project. A conditional negative declaration will wiil be prepared. _:_:_ • I ·£ind the proposed project }li\Y have a signi:ticarit effect • on the environn!ent, and an ENVIROM\1ENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ·~ • ~. V. MITIG/\TING J\1EI\SURES (IF APPLICABLE) . .. • ... • .. . . .