HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-01-06; Planning Commission; ; CT 92-06|PUD 92-07 - CANYON PACIFICAPPLic9roN COMPLETE DATE:
November 3, 1992
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 6, 1993 ®
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: CT 92-06/PUD 92-07 -CANYON PACIFIC-Request for approval of a nine-lot
Tentative Tract Map and Non-residential Planned Unit Development for the
purpose of subdividing an existing industrial development on a 8.508-acre
parcel at 2768-2782 Loker Avenue West within the Carlsbad Oaks Business
Center (Specific Plan 200), and in Local Facilities Management Zone 5.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No's. 3473 and
3474 APPROVING CT 92-06 and PUD 92-07 based upon the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of a nine-lot Tentative Tract Map and Non-residential
Planned Unit Development to subdivide an existing development consisting of eight single-
story industrial buildings located on the Northeast side of Loker Avenue West on Lots 10-
13 in the Carlsbad Oaks Business Center. The development was originally approved by
Planned Industrial Permit PIP 86-2 on January 20, 1987. The subdivision will create nine
lots ranging in size from 16,098 square feet to 28,921 square feet equaling the individual
building footprints plus ten feet. (The Uniform Building Code requires that lot lines be
at least ten feet from the building face if building openings are provided.) Lot 9 includes
the access driveway, parking spaces serving the project, outdoor employee eating areas, and
perimeter landscaping. •
III. ANALYSIS
The proposed project is subject to the following plans, ordinances, and standards:
A. P-M (Planned Industrial) Zone Regulations (Chapter 21.34 of the Municipal
Code), Carlsbad Oaks Business Center Specific Plan (SP 200), Subdivision
Map Act, and Subdivision Regulations (Title 20 of the Municipal Code).
B. Non-residential Planned Unit Development Regulations (Chapter 21.47 of the
Municipal Code)
C. Growth Management Ordinance (Local Facilities Management Zone 5)
~
CT 92-06/PUD 92-07 -ctlYON PACIFIC
JANUARY 6, 1993
PAGE 2
A. P-M ZONE AND CARLSBAD OAKS BUSINESS CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN 200
Approval of the existing· project by PIP 86-2 required compliance with all of the
development standards imposed by the PM Zone and by Specific Plan 200. The proposed
Tentative Tract Map and Planned Unit Development is necessary to provide for separate
ownership of the eight industrial buildings and to provide for the maintenance of the
common areas through the required CC&R's. The project complies with all of the
requirements of the Specific Plans and PM Zone, as well as subdivision regulations.
The project is served by 350 parking spaces located around the perimeter of the project.
Central driveways leading between the buildings provide a few spaces and accommodate
loading doors. The required CC&R's will restrict the types and proportion of uses on Lots
1 through 8 so that the development will not generate the need for more than the 350
parking spaces currently provided on Lot 9.
The project is also required to provide 7,464 square feet of employee eating areas. The
project currently provides 3,289 square feet of eating area -1,444 square feet indoors and
1,845 square feet outdoors. The existing indoor eating area consists of small areas in
Buildings A, B, E, and F. The existing outdoor eating areas are located between Buildings
F and G and in several locations on the Northeast side of the project adjacent to the
canyon. The applicant proposes to expand each of these existing outdoor eating areas and
to provide new outdoor eating areas along the Southwest side of the development near
Buildings A and D and between Buildings Band C. This would result in 81 % of the total
employee eating area being provided outdoors in individual areas adjacent to each building.
Eating area amenities (e.g., tables, benches, trash receptacles) will be provided in each
location.
B. NON-RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
The project satisfies the required findings of The Non-residential Planned Unit Development
(PUD) regulations as discussed below:
1) The granting of the permits will not adversely affect and will be consistent
with the code, the general plan, applicable specific plans, and all adopted
plans of the city and other governmental agencies. As discussed in section
A of this report, the project is consistent with the General Plan, the
underlying zoning, and Specific Plan 200.
2) The proposed use at the particular location is necessary and desirable to
provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well-being
of the neighborhood and the community. The project is an existing industrial
office development located in a P-M Zone and in an area designated for
Planned Industrial (PI) uses by the General Plan.
3) The use is not detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons
CT 92-06/PUD 92-07 -&ON PACIFIC
JANUARY 6, 1993
PAGE 3
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements
in the vicinity. The uses are consistent with those allowed in an industrial
office park and with the SP 200 regulations governing the site.
4) The project meets all of the minimum development standards of the
underlying zone, as discussed in Section A of this report.
In addition to the above required findings, the Non-residential PUD regulations Section
21.47.090 requires that the structure to be converted must meet present city building
regulations. The subject project satisfies that requirement.
C. GROWfH MANAGEMENT
The proposed project consists of the subdivision of an existing development. Therefore,
the impacts on public facilities have already been considered during review of the Planned
Industrial Permit approved on January 20, 1987.
IV. ENVIRONMENT AL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project is categorically exempt from
environmental review under Section 15301 (o) of the California Environmental Quality Act.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3473
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3474
3. Location Map
4. Background Data Sheet
5. Local Facilities Impacts Assessment Form
6. Disclosure Form
7. Planned Industrial Permit (PIP) 86-2 approval dated January 20, 1987
8. Exhibits "A"-"F" dated January 6, 1993.
EB:vd:km
December 9, 1992
ITE
RD
CANYON PACIFIC
City of Cartsba,
CT 92-6/
PUD 92-7
CASE NO:
-BACKGROUND DATA SHEET -
CT 92-06/PUD 92-07
CASE NAME: _C=a=n~y ____ o=n~P~a=c=ifi=c'-----------------------
APPLICANT: B. W. Pacific Partners
REQUEST AND LOCATION: A Tentative Map and Non-residential Planned Unit
Development Northeast of Loker Avenue between El Fuerte and Palomar Airport Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 10-13, Carlsbad Oaks Business Center, Carlsbad Tract 74-21
APN: 209-081-25
(Assessor'sParcelNumber)
Acres 8.508 Proposed No. of Lots/Units ~2 __ _
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation -=P--'-I=----
Density Allowed _-_--____ Density Proposed _-_--__
Existing Zone -=P_-=M~---Proposed Zone -=P_-_M __ _
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning
Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site P-M -=-~--Industrial
North P-M -=-=-"---Open Space Canyon
South P-M -=-=-"---Industrial offices and undeveloped
East P-M -=-=-"---Industrial Offices
West -=Pa....-=M:....---Undeveloped
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District NIA Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) -=3~2~.5~--------------
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated --=-A-=-=u~gu=st=--=2_,_4.._, -=-19_,_9"-'2=-------------
ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
_ Negative Declaration, issued ___________________ _
_ Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated _____________ _
Other, Categorically Exempt per Section 15301(0) EB:vd
CITY OF CARLSBAD
GROWTII MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILfITES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO.: Canvon Pacific -CT 92-06/PUD 92-07
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: 5 GENERAL PLAN: P-I
DEVELOPER'S NAME: B. W. Pacific Partners
ADDRESS: 2796 Loker Avenue West. #101B Carlsbad. CA 92008
ZONING: P-M
PHONE NO.: (619) 438-6660 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 209-081-25
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 8.508 ac
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage =
Library: Demand in Square Footage =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Park: Demand in Acreage =
Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire:
Open Space:
Schools:
Served by Fire Station No. =
Acreage Provided -
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demand in EDUs -
Identify Sub Basin -
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
Water: Demand in GPO -
NIA
NIA
$.40lsq.ft.
NIA
NIA
701
2,4
NIA
NIA
32.5
NIA
7,160
EB:vd
.•
12/29/1992 16:08 DAUISON & PARTNERS **** 619 4386660 P.01
____ .. -:,:.~.--C ______ i ____ ty.,____;.o~f.:-.._;::C=-'la~~r ~I s~b~a~d -
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPUCAN'T'S STAT!MENT OF OISCLOSURE OF CERTAIN OWNEASHIP INT'ERESTS ON ALL APPI.JCATIONS
WI-IICH WILL REOUIRI! OISCRl!T10~Y ACTION ON TM! PAAT OF Tl-41! CITY COUNCIL. 0~ ANY APPOINTED
BOAA0. COMMISSION OJll COMMITTII,
(Please Print)
The following information must ·b• dl1clo11d:
1. AQpllcant
2.
Ust the name, and addresses of all persons having a nnanciat Interest in the application. b.~. ~ACIFIC PARTNERS
c/ o CLIF·FORD/DAVlSON COMPANIES
~796 Loker Avenue West
Suite 101-B
Carlsbad, CA 92008
awn,,
Ust the names and addre111s af all person• ·having iny ownership interest In the property involved.
B.W. PACIFIC PARTNERS
c/o CLI~FORD/DAyrspN COMPANIES 2196 Lo er Avenue West
Suite 101-B
Carlsbad, CA 92008
3. If any person identified purauant to (1) or (2) ·above i1 a corporation or partnership, 11st tho names ar
addreu•• of 111 lndlvlduall ownln; more than 10% of th• share• in the corporation or owning any partners~
intere1t In the partnerahlp.
Pres co t t Man a geme n L Corp • ....,A_li,,iia_,n:....:;D;.;a:..:v~.i=-=s~o.:.n::.....-------
e. /o The Clifford·companies c/o The Clifford·Cgmpa1Jje5
1920 Main Street1 Suite 620 1920 Main Street. Suite 620
Irvine, CA 92714 Irvine, CA 92714
66%
Continued on attached page.
4. If any person identified purauant to (1) or (2) above 1, a non.profft organization or • tru1t. ll1t the names ari
addr111ea of any peraon MNing u officer or director of the non-profit organization or u tru1tee or baneficiar
of the truat.
(Over)
12/29/1992 16:09 DAUISON & PARTNERS **** 619 4386660 P.03 --
Disclosure Statement Page2
s. Have you had more than 1250 wont, of busln, .. tr1n1acted with any member of City staff, Scar::;
Commiasiona, Committee, and Couneil within the put twelve montha'?
YH _ No .E If y11, plea• Indicate p1r1on(1) ___________________ _
Person is daflf\ad u: 'Any individual, firm. copartnership, joint 'ienture, association. s,ociaj club, fraternal
organiZation, corporalton. Ntate, trua receiver. syndicate. this and any other county, city and -;cunty, city
municipality, dllirtcl o, acne, polltJcal subdlviaion, o, any otner group or combination acting u 11. • • ----
lNOTE: Attach •ddltlonal pa;•••• necaasary.)
~ t)~lolgc/92
Signature ot Owner/date 1
a_k t!J~ 1~Jry19J'.
Signature of applicant/data '
Alan Davison for B.W. Pacific Alan Davison for B,W,Pacific Partn~
Print or type name of owner Partners Print o, type namt ot applicant Par t n er. s
TOTAL P.03
16:09 DRUISON & PARTNERS ****
Page 3 -
B.W. PACIFIC PARTNERS
3. (cont,)
LEP Real Estate Inc., A California Corp.
c/o Richard Stinehart
Attorney at Law
Allen, Matkins, Leck, Gamble & Mallory
184 Von Karman
Fourth Floor
Irvine, CA 92715
619 4386660 P.02 -
•
PLANNED INDUSTRIAL PERMIT
January 20, 1987
DAVIDSON & FERGUSON INVESTMENT DEVELOPERS
19600 Fairchild, Suite 240
Irvine, CA 92715
PIP 86-2 -CANYON PACIFIC
The City has completed a review of the application for a planned
industrial permit for development located on the northside of
Loker, north of Palomar Airport Road.
It is the Planning Director's determination that the project
is consistent with the City's Planned Industrial Zone regulations
(Chapter 21.34) and with all other applicable City ordinances and
policies. The Planning Director, therefore, recommends approval
of this request based on the following:
Findings:
1) The project is consistent with all City public facility pol-
icies and ordinances since:
a) The Planning Department has, by inclusion of an
appropriate condition to this project, ensured building
permits will not be issued for the project unless the
City Engineer determines that sewer service is
available, and building cannot occur within the project
unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the
Public Facilities Element of the General Plan have been
met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this
project.
b) All necessary public improvements have been provided or
will be required as conditions of approval.
' c) The applicant has agreed and is required by the
inclusion of an appropriate condition to pay a public
facilities fee. Performance of that contract and
payment of the fee will enable this body to find that
public facilities will be available concurrent with need
as required by the General Plan.
d) Assurances have been given that adequate sewer for the
project will be provided by the City of Carlsbad.
2) This project will not cause any significant environmental
impacts and a Negative Declaration has been issued by the
Planning Director on November 19, 1986.
• •
3) The site indicated by the Planned Industrial Permit
is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed
use, and all yards spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading,
landscaping and other features required by this chapter.
4) The improvements indicated on the Planned Industrial Permit
are located in such a manner to be related to existing and
proposed streets and highways.
conditions:
1) Approval is granted for PIP 86-2 as shown on Exhibits
"A" -"P", dated September 4, 1986, on file in the Planning
Department and incorporated herein by reference.
Development shall occur substantially as shown unless
otherwise noted in these conditions.
2) All uses established in this structure(s) shall be
consistent with Section 21.34.020 (Permitted Uses).
3) All roof appurtenances shall be shielded from view and
architecturally integrated with the building design.
4) Unless otherwise stated, this industrial project shall
comply with all applicable City ordinances and requirements~
5) Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with
all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other
applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
6) The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irriga-
tion plan which shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Director prior to the issuance of grading or
building permits, whichever occurs first.
7) All parking lot trees shall be a minimum of 15 gallons in
size.
8) Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a six-foot high
masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards.
Location of said receptacles shall be approved by the
Planning Dir~ctor.
9) All tenant improvements and uses shall be constructed as
per the parking ratios shown on Exhibit "P", dated December
4, 1986 and shall be shown on the applicant's grant deed as
a deed restriction.
10) Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on
all new and existing buildings so as to be plainly visible
from the street or access road; color of identification
and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
-2-
• •
Engineering Department:
11) All required fire hydrants, water mains, and appurtenances
shall be o~erational prior t~ combustible building materials
being located on the project site.
12) Additonal public and onsite fire hydrants shall be required
subject to the approval of the Fire Marshal.
1 3 )' All lots within this project shall conform
Ordinance (Title 21) with respect to size,
land use.
to current Zoning
setbacks, and
14) This project is approved upon the express condition that
building permits will not be issued for development of the
subject property unless the City Engineer determines that
sewer capacity is available at the time of application for
such permits and will continue to be available until time of
occupancy. This note shall be place on the final map.
15) The grading for this project is defined as "regular· grading"
by Section ll.06.170(a) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. The
developer shall submit a grading plan for approval which
shall include all required drainage structures and any re-
quired erosion control measures. The developer shall also
submit soils, geologic or compaction reports if required and
shall comply with all provisions of Chapter 11.06 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code.
16) No grading shall occur outside the limits of the project
unless a letter of permission is obtained from the owners of
the affected properties.
17) A separate grading plan shall be submitted and approved and
a separate grading permit issued for the borrow or disposal
site if located within the city limits.
18) Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to any
proposed construction site within this project the developer
shall submit to and receive approval from the City Engineer
for the proposed haul route. The developer shall comply
with all conditions and requirements the City Engineer may
impose with regards to the hauling operation.
19) The developer shall exercise special care during the
construction phase of this project to prevent any offsite
siltation. The developer shall provide erosion control
measures and shall construct temporary desiltation/detention
basins of type, size and location as approved by the City
Engineer. The basins and erosion control measures shall be
shown and specified on the grading plan and shall be
constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior
to the start of any other grading operations. Prior to the
-3-
• •
removal of any basins or facilities so constructed the area
served shall be protected by additional drainage facilities,
slope erosion control measures and other methods required or
approved by the City Engineer. The developer shall maintain
the temporary basins and erosion control measures for a
period of time satisfactory to the City Engineer and shall
guarantee their maintenance and satisfactory performance
through cash deposit and bonding in amounts and types
suitable to the City Engineer.
If you have any questions please call me at 438-1161.
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
Planning Director
MJH:EVR:bn
-4-