HomeMy WebLinkAbout2827 WHIPTAIL LP; ; FPC2017-0115; Permit(7city of
Carlsbad
Print Date: 09/02/2020 Permit No: FPC2017-0115
Job Address: 2827 WHIPTAIL LOOP, CARLSBAD, CA Status: Closed - Finaled
Permit Type: FIRE-Construction Commercial Work Class: Underground Fire
Parcel #: Track #: Applied: 05/05/2017
Valuation: $0.00 Lot #: Issued: 10/02/2017
Occupancy Group: - Project #: Finaled Close Out: 09/02/2020
#of Dwelling Units: Plan #:
Bedrooms: Construction Type:
Bathrooms: Orig. Plan Check #: Inspector:
Plan Check #: Final Inspection:
Project Title:
Description: CARLSBAD OAKS NORTH LOT 24 -PRIVATE FIRE LINE UNDGERGROUND PLAN
F PContractor:
INLAND VALLEY PIPELINE-DO NOT USE
27852 KELLER RD
MENIFEE, CA 92584-9645
(951) 368-3903
FEE AMOUNT
FIRE Underground Piping with 5+ Hyds/Risers $996.00
Total Fees: $996.00 Total Payments To Date: $996.00 Balance Due: $0.00
Fire Department Page 1 of 1
1635 Faraday Avenue, Carlsbad CA 92008-7314 1 760-602-4665 1 760-602-8561 f I www.carlsbadca.gov
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENGINEERING
LAND PLANNING ENGINEERING SURVEYING
440 STATE PLACE, ESCONDIDO, CA 92029
PH (760)749118 FX (760)745-1890
CARLSBAD OAKS LOT 24
FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS FOR:
Excel Reference No.: 16-034
RAF GROUP LOT 24, LLC
ATrN: ADAM ROBINSON
Date:
August 21, 2017
Prepared For:
Prepared By:
Frc'Lorf outs
I
PURPOSE/PROJECT DESCRIPTION
I This water system analysis was conducted to check the capacities of the proposed onsite private
underground fire distribution system and potable water supply lines that will serve the
proposed Carlsbad Oaks Lot 24. A 12" lateral Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) connection will service the
I onsite fire system, originating from an existing 12" water line running below Gazelle Court. The
fire line connection will utilize one 12" double detector check valves (DDCV). The connection
services an onsite looped fire system consisting of a 12", a 10", and an 8" line that will serve the
I fire sprinkler connections and six separate hydrants around the site.
I
CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY
The modeling of the onsite fire service lines was completed using the EPANET 2.0 program
(EPANET). Usage of the water and sewer plans provided the scaled distances for the project.
I The schematic used in EPANET can be found on Attachment 1.
I
Head Loss Across Fittings
Minor losses encountered in the Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) fittings along the pipelines were
neglected in the model (i.e. elbows, tees, etc.). The headloss (HL) across the backflow apparatus
I was addressed and modeled using the method described below.
The Watts 12" double check detector assembly (DCDA) was modeled as a general purpose valve
I (GPV) in series with a check valve. The HL curve can be found on the specification sheet for the
Watts DCDA on Attachment 2. This information was used to develop Figure 1 below, which
displays the HL curve created for usage in EPANET to model the flow within the system.
I Additional information for the proposed backflow device can be found on Attachment 2.
I
I
I
I
I
I
LT1
I
I
I 2
I Curve Editor
Curve ID Description
IwATT5 12' DCDjAI
Curve Type Equation
HEADLOSS j I
Flow HeadIo J
0 12.379
30-
500 9.227
25-
1000 6.459
20-
' 15- U / 1500 8.073
"-.. .
2000 9.227 U
0 2,000 4,000
2500 11.533
-
Load... Save... OK J Cancelj Help
Fig. 1: HL Curve for the 12" DCDA
Roughness Coefficients
A Hazen-Williams roughness coefficient value of 150 was used for the PVC pipes in the system.
Modeled Demand Flows
To ensure the onsite hydraulics can supply adequate flow to the system during a fire event,
Excel Engineering tested a primary and secondary scenario. The 2016 California Fire Code (CFC)
refers to Appendix B to obtain fire-flow requirements for buildings. Using Table B105.1, it was
determined that the type IlIB, 144,500 square foot building would require a fire-flow of 8,000
gallons per minute (gpm). By providing the building with fire sprinklers, the required flow can
be reduced by 75 percent and results in a required flow of 2,000 gpm. For the purposes of this
report, the flow was only reduced by 50 percent to 4,000 gpm. The calculated fire-flow system
criteria enabled the following scenarios to be tested:
Scenario 1 - For this scenario, a demand of 4,000 gpm was supplied to the system and
distributed between two hydrants furthest from the onsite connection, one hydrant
located near the loop connection point, and no flow was provided to the building.
Scenario 2 - For this scenario, a demand of 4,000 gpm was supplied to the system and
distributed between the two hydrants furthest from the onsite connection, one hydrant
located near the loop connection point, and a flow of 500 gpm was provided to the
building.
I
I
I
I
I
I
[1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Tie-In Pressures Available
Existing flow and pressure data from the public system in Whiptail Loop East was taken from a
flow analysis performed by the City of Carlsbad Fire Department (CCFD) on 01/17/2017. To
model this scenario in EPANET the pressure available was modeled as a reservoir with a total
head equivalent to the Static Pressures given in the analysis provided by the City. This pressure
test data can be found on Attachment 3 to this report, and is summarized in the table below.
Table 1: CCFD Flow Test Results
Hydrant NO Static Static Elevation (ft) Total Head Reservoir
Pressure (psi) Pressure Available Number
(ft of head) (ft)
134 309 377 686 1
CALCULATONS AND CONCLUSIONS
This performed analysis confirms that the underground fire distribution system will provide fire
flows to the site for Scenario 1 and Scenario 2 given the following parameters:
Minimum residual pressure for the project shall be 20 pounds per square inch (psi)
during fire flow demand.
Pipe velocities shall not exceed 10 feet per second (fps).
The velocity and pressure results for this project are discussed below.
Scenario 1
For this scenario, the highest velocity found in the system was in multiple pipes.
This velocity was recorded as 11.35 fps. See Attachment 4.
Minimum Pressure - For this scenario, the minimum pressure in the system is
found in Junction 33. The recorded pressure was 107.0 psi. See Attachment 5.
A velocity of 17.02 fps was found in the pipes leading to the hydrants (Pipe 22 and 12) for this
scenario.
Scenario 2
For this scenario, the highest velocity found in the system was in multiple pipes.
This velocity was recorded as 12.77 fps. See Attachment 6.
Minimum Pressure - For this scenario, the minimum pressure in the system is
found in Junction 33. The recorded pressure was 103.4 psi. See Attachment 7.
A velocity of 17.02 fps was found in the pipes leading to the hydrants (Pipe 27 and 25) for this
scenario.
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Site Schematic
Existing 770 Zone 12"
pvc in Gazelle Court
/ Junction #35
Flow = 1,000 gpm
(both scenarios)
Existing Hydrant
On 16" PVC water line in 770 zone
(see fire flow test)
/ Junction #33
/ Flow = 1,500 gpm
/ (both scenarios)
Junction #31
Flow = 500 gpm
(scenario two)
/ Junction #32
/ Flow = 1,500 gpm
/ (both scenarios)
ru
ES-774DCDA
Job Name ______________________________________ Contractor
Job Location Approval
Engineer Contractor's P.O. No
I Approval Representative
I
I
Series 774DCDA
Double Check Detector Assemblies
Sizes 21/211 - 12" (65 - 300mm)
Series 774DCDA Double Check Detector Assemblies are designed for use in
accordance with water utility non-health hazard containment requirements. It
is mandatory to prevent the reverse flow of fire protection system substances,
i.e., glycerin wetting agents, stagnant water and water of non-potable quality
from being pumped or siphoned into the potable water supply.
Features
Torsion spring check valve provides low head loss
Short lay length is ideally suited for retrofit installations
Stainless steel body is half the weight of competitive designs reducing
installation and shipping cost
Stainless steel construction provides long term corrosion
protection and maximum strength
Single top access cover with two-bolt grooved style coupling
for ease of maintenance
Thermoplastic and stainless steel check valves for trouble-free
operation
No special tools required for servicing
Compact construction allows for smaller vaults and enclosures
Furnished with 5/s" x 1/4"(116xl9mm) bronze meter (gpm or ctm)
Detects underground leaks and unauthorized water use
May be installed horizontal or vertical "flow up" position
Specifications
A Double Check Detector Assembly shall be installed on fire protection
systems when connected to a potable water supply. Degree of hazard pres-
ent is determined by the local authority having jurisdiction. The assembly
shall consist of two positive seating check valves located between two
resilient seated shutoffs with a hydraulically balanced bypass line and four
test cocks. The main valve body shall be manufactured from 300 Series
stainless steel to provide corrosion resistance. The check valves shall be
of thermoplastic construction with stainless steel hinge pins, cam arm and
cam bearing. The check valves shall utilize a single torsion spring design
to minimize pressure drop through the assembly. The check valves shall
be modular and shall seal to the main valve body by the use of an 0-ring.
There shall be no brass or bronze parts used within the check valve assem-
bly. The check valve seats shall be of molded thermoplastic construction.
The use of seat screws as a retention method is prohibited. All internal
parts shall be accessible through a single cover on the valve assembly. The
valve cover shall be held in place through the use of a single grooved style
two-bolt coupling. The bypass line shall be hydraulically sized to accurately
measure low flow. The bypass line shall consist of a meter, a small diameter
double check assembly with test cocks and isolation valves. The bypass line
double check valve shall have two independently operating modular poppet
check valves, and top mounted test cocks. The assembly shall be a Watts
Series 774DCDA.
Test Cock Grooved Coupling Bypass Double
.... Check Valve
Bypass Meter
Test Cock
Test Cock. Resilient
Disc
Laser Cut Polished Cam Arm
Available Models
Suffix:
LF - without shutoff valves
OSY - UL/FM outside stem and yoke resilient seated gate valves
*y FxG - flanged inlet gate connection and grooved outlet gate con-
nection
*Q5%j GxF
- grooved inlet gate connection and flanged outlet gate
connection
*\1 GxG - grooved inlet gate connection and grooved outlet gate
connection
CFM - cubic feet per minute meter
GPM - gallons per minute meter
Available with grooved NRS gate valves - consult factory*
Post indicator plate and operating nut available - consult factory*
*Consult factory for dimensions
Now Available
WattsBox Insulated Enclosures.
For more information, send for literature ES-WB.
Inquire with governing authorities for local installation requirements
I
H
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
Watts product specifications in U.S. customary units and metric are approximate and are provided for reference only. For precise measurements,
out prior notice and without incurring any obligation to make such changes and modifications on Watts products previously or subsequently sold. I please contact Watts Technical Service. Watts reserves the right to change or modify product design, construction, specifications, or materials with-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Materials
All internal metal parts: 300 Series stainless steel, Main valve body: 300
Series stainless steel, Check assembly: Noryl® Flange dimensions in accor-
dance with AWWA Class D.
Pressure - Temperature
Temperature Range: 33°F - 110°F (0.5°C - 43°C) continuous
Pressure Range: 175ps1 (12.1 bar)
Capacity
Flow curves as tested by Underwriters Laboratory per UL 1469, 1996 * Rate
kPa pal 214" (65mm) **
63 12
69 10
55 8
41 6
—.% 28 4
14 2
14
0 25 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400450 500 525 ppm
95 190 380 570 760 950 1140 1330 1520 1710 1900 19951pm
15 fps 4.6 mpg
Flow
kP psi 3" (80mnj) **
83 12
1 11 6910
1 11 55 8
41 6
-- __
o. 14 2 - - - -
0 25 50 100 150 200 250300 350 400450 500 550600 ppm
95 190 380 570 760 950 1140 1330 1520 1710 1900 20902280 1pm
15 fps
Flow 4.6 mpg
4" (100mm) Us psi * **
IL 103 15
83 12
41
CL 21
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 ppm
171 380 570 760 950 11401330 1520 1170 1900 2090 2280 270 2660 2850 1pm
5 10 15 fps
-
1.5 Flow 3 4.6
-
mpg
lol
registered trade 00 -
mark of SABIC ° °
Innovative P ----- PlasticsrM.
ES-774DCDA 1623
Standards
AWWA C510, CSA B64.5
Approvals
(21/2" - 10° only)
(65 - 250mm)
.SSlP4
C YL US Approved
1048 (OSY only)
kPa psi 6" (150mm)
103 15
06 2 83 12
2 62 9 =
41 6 2 0- 21 3 ________
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 ppm
380 760 1140 1520 1900 2280 2660 3040 3420 3800 4180 4560 4940 5320 5700 1pm
5 10 15 Ips
1.5 Flow 3 4.6 mpg
lipa psi 8' (200mm)
CL 8312
2 62 9
41 6
21 3
0 250 500 750 1000 12501500 1750 2000 2250 2500 ppm
950 1900 2050 3800 4750 5700 6650 7600 8550 9500 1pm
5 10 15 fps 1.5 Flow 3 4.6 mpg
kPa pal 10" (250mm)
CL 103 15
2 8312
62 9
41 6
IRD 0- 21 3
0 250 500 7501000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 3000 3500 ppm
950 1900 2850 3800 4750 5700 6650 7600 8550 9500 11400 13300 1pm
5 10 15 fps
kPa psi 12" (300mm)
110 16
97 14
CL 83 12
6910
2508
41 6
28 4
0- 14 2
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 ppm
1900 3800 5700 7600 9500 11400 13300 15200 17100 1pm
5 10 fps
1.5 Flow 3 mpg
USA: Tel: (978) 689-6066 • Fax: (978) 975-8350 • Watts.com
Canada: Tel: (905) 332-4090 • Fax: (905) 332-7068 • Watts.ca
Latin America: Tel: (52) 81-1001-8600 • Fax: (52) 81-8000-7091 • Watts.com
0 2016 Watts
d flow **UL Tested
in. mm
A
in. mm
C (OS'V
in. mm
D
in. mm in.
6
mm
L
in. mm
P
in. mm
w/Gates
lbs kgs.
w/o Gates
lbs. kgs.
21/2 65 37 940 16/e 416 31/2 89 10 250 22 559 121/2 318 155 70 68 31
3 80 38 965 187/8 479 33/4 95 10 250 22 559 13 330 230 104 70 32
4 100 40 1016 22/4 578 41/2 114 10 250 22 559 141/2 368 240 109 73 33
6 150 481/2 1232 301/8 765 51/2 140 15 381 271/2 699 151/2 394 390 177 120 54
8 200 521/2 1334 373/4 959 6% 171 15 381 291/2 749 181/4 464 572 259 180 82
10 250 551/2 1410 453/4 1162 8 200 15 381 291/2 749 191/2 495 774 351 190 86
12 300 571/2 1461 531/8 1349 9½ 241 15 381 291/2 749 21 533 1044 474 220 100
I Largest Building (ft.2): Construction Type: Sprinkled?
CARLSBAD FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Prevention Division
1635 Faraday Avenue - Carlsbad, CA 92008
760.602.4665
WATER AVAILABILITY FORM
SECTION A: TO BE COMPLETED BY CUSTOMER
PROJECT NAME: Whiptail Loop E - Lots 7, 8 & 13 SR#:
(Assigned upon plan submittal)
PROJECT ADDRESS: Whiptail Loop CITY: Carlsbad
PHONE: ( 760) 745-8118 x210 (Excel Engineering) FAX NUMBER:
I
SECTION B: TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL WATER COMPANY. CUSTOMER TO PROVIDE RESULTS TO CFD.
Water Purveyor: City of Carlsbad
Location of test (reference map required): Whiptail Loop E between Bobcat and Gazelle
TEST INFORMATION IS VALID FOR 6 MONTHS FROM DATE PERFORMED
Flow Test Results
Static pressure: 134 PSI Hydrant Number (if applicable):H61671
Elevation of test: 391 (est.) Feet Date/Time of Test':
Pitot Tube Reading: PSI Corresponding Flow: GPM
Total Flow: 81000 GPM Residual Pressure 126 PSI
Atpeakdemand, this water system is capable of providing a fire flow discharge at 20 psi of greater than 8,000 gpm.
'Test to be performed as close as possible to the time the most conservative flows and pressures are expected.
Note: If the water availability information was obtained in a manner other than a flow test (i.e. computer
modeling), fill out the information above as applicable and check here: x
Name:2*TferMael,P.E. Eng. Lic. No. (if applicable): C69606
Signat ___________________________________
'V
Title/O Manager Date: 01/17/2017
I
I
I
I
11
I
I
1
I
Li
I
I
I
I
I
I
Whiptail Loop E - Lots 7, 8 & 13 Fire Flow Analysis (Test Site No. 1)
13
D
16 P—TLW
61671 a
a BOC4TCT a
a
a
a a
a
FARADAY AV
Prepared By: Jennifer R. MacI, P.E. - MCS Date: Tuesday, January 17, 2017
I Page 1
Attachment 4
Network Table - Links
Link ID
Length
ft
Diameter
in
Flow
GPM
Velocity
fps
Pump 6 #N/A #N/A 4000.00 0.00
Pipe 12 27 6 0.00 0.00
Pipe 22 27 6 0.00 0.00
Pipe 32 9 6 0.00 0.00
Pipe 19 32.49 10 0.00 0.00
Pipe 14 36.08 10 0.00 0.00
Pipe 15 9 10 0.00 0.00
Pipe 13 17.93 10 0.00 0.00
Pipe 45 75.72 8 107.91 0.69
Pipe 24 156.71 8 -107.91 0.69
Pipe 46 51.1 8 107.91 0.69
Pipe 7 43.47 16 4000.00 6.38
Pipe 3 9.32 10 -1607.91 6.57
Pipe 2 102.21 8 -1392.09 8.89
Pipe 10 120.51 8 -1392.09 8.89
Pipe 11 7.64 8 -1392.09 8.89
Pipe 8 15.62 8 -1392.09 8.89
Pipe 9 20.29 8 -1392.09 8.89
Pipe 17 46.98 8 1392.09 8.89
Pipe 23 218 8 1392.09 8.89
Pipe 21 109.37 8 1392.09 8.89
Pipe 20 135.2 8 1392.09 8.89
Pipe 4 10.78 10 2392.09 9.77
Pipe 33 105.04 8 -1607.91 10.26
Pipe 31 15.76 8 -1607.91 10.26
I
I
I
1
I
LI
I
Li
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Li
I
I
I
I
I Page 2
Attachment 4
Link ID
Length
ft
Diameter
in
Flow
GPM
Velocity
fps
Pipe 18 153.54 8 -1607.91 10.26
Pipe 34 38.09 8 -1607.91 10.26
Pipe 44 101.46 8 -1607.91 10.26
Pipe 43 182.72 8 -1607.91 10.26
Pipe 42 9.67 6 1000.00 11.35
Pipe 49 1 12 4000.00 11.35
Pipe 50 31.38 12 4000.00 11.35
Valve 48 #N/A 12 4000.00 11.35
Pipe 47 17.21 12 4000.00 11.35
Pipe 5 102.16 12 -4000.00 11.35
Pipe 16 167 12 4000.00 11.35
Pipe 27 9 6 1500.00 17.02
Pipe 25 9 6 1500.00 17.02
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment 5
Network Table - Nodes
Node ID
Elevation
ft
Base Demand
GPM
Head
ft
Pressure
psi
Resvr 48 397.74 #N/A 397.74 0.00
June 33 393.75 1500 640.70 107.00
Junc32 393.56 1500 640.63 107.06
June 7 387.52 0 641.78 110.17
June 42 387.45 0 641.77 110.20
June8 387.41 0 641.75 110.21
Junc9 387.08 0 641.72 110.33
June 18 393.26 0 648.60 110.64
June 35 394.3 0 651.38 111.39
June 15 387.03 0 644.36 111.50
June 16 386.78 0 644.77 111.79
June 17 386.45 0 645.29 112.16
June 20 388.48 0 648.41 112.63
June 6 387.54 0 647.95 112.84
June 19 387.53 0 648.60 113.12
June 22 393.16 0 654.24 113.13
June 5 388.04 0 651.38 114.11
June4 387.87 0 651.91 114.41
June 21 387.62 0 654.24 115.53
June 49 398.29 0 665.42 115.75
June 12 398.29 0 665.45 115.76
June 26 393.4 1000 661.23 116.05
June 3 386.25 0 655.46 116.65
June 23 387.33 0 657.07 116.88
June 2 386.92 0 656.75 116.92
Page 1
I
Li
I
I
I
I
I
I Page 2
Attachment 5
Node ID
Elevation
ft
Base Demand
GPM
Head
ft
Pressure
psi
Junc24 387.79 0 660.57 118.19
June 31 389.13 0 661.93 118.20
June 30 388.26 0 661.93 118.58
June 29 387.74 0 661.93 118.81
June 28 387.56 0 661.93 118.89
June 10 386.56 0 662.04 119.36
June 25 386.25 0 661.78 119.39
June 11 388.89 0 664.63 119.48
June 27 385.58 0 661.93 119.74
June 14 402.27 0 693.10 126.02
June 13 399.91 0 692.67 126.85
June 46 396.4 0 697.33 130.39
June 47 394 0 697.60 131.55
I
I
I
I
[1
Li
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment 6
Network Table - Links
Link ID
Length
ft
Diameter
in
Flow
GPM
Velocity
fjs
Pump 6 #N/A #N/A 4500.00 0.00
Pipe 22 27 6 0.00 0.00
Pipe 12 27 6 0.00 0.00
Pipe 32 9 6 0.00 0.00
Pipe 45 75.72 8 106.56 0.68
Pipe 24 156.71 8 -106.56 0.68
Pipe 46 51.1 8 106.56 0.68
Pipe 14 36.08 10 500.00 2.04
Pipe 13 17.93 10 500.00 2.04
Pipe 15 9 10 -500.00 2.04
Pipe 19 32.49 10 500.00 2.04
Pipe 7 43.47 16 4500.00 7.18
Pipe 3 9.32 10 -2106.56 8.61
Pipe 2 102.21 8 -1393.44 8.89
Pipe 10 120.51 8 -1393.44 8.89
Pipe 11 7.64 8 -1393.44 8.89
Pipe 8 15.62 8 -1393.44 8.89
Pipe 9 20.29 8 -1393.44 8.89
Pipe 17 46.98 8 1393.44 8.89
Pipe 23 218 8 1393.44 8.89
Pipe 21 109.37 8 1393.44 8.89
Pipe 20 135.2 8 1393.44 8.89
Pipe 4 10.78 10 2393.44 9.78
Pipe 33 105.04 8 -1606.56 10.25
Pipe 31 15.76 8 -1606.56 10.25
Page 1
I
I
Li
I
I
I
I
I Page 2
Attachment 6
Link ID
Length
ft
Diameter
in
Flow
GPM
Velocity
fps
Pipe 18 153.54 8 -1606.56 10.25
Pipe 34 38.09 8 -1606.56 10.25
Pipe 44 101.46 8 -1606.56 10.25
Pipe 43 182.72 8 -1606.56 10.25
Pipe 42 9.67 6 1000.00 11.35
Pipe 49 1 12 4500.00 12.77
Pipe 50 31.38 12 4500.00 12.77
Valve 48 #N/A 12 4500.00 12.77
Pipe 47 17.21 12 4500.00 12.77
Pipe 5 102.16 12 -4500.00 12.77
Pipe 16 167 12 4500.00 12.77
Pipe 27 9 6 1500.00 17.02
Pipe 25 9 6 1500.00 17.02
I
[11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
h
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment 7
Network Table - Nodes
Node ID
Elevation
ft
Base Demand
GPM
Head
ft
Pressure
psi
Resvr48 397.74 #N/A 397.74 0.00
Junc33 393.75 1500 632.40 103.41
June 32 393.56 1500 632.34 103.46
Junc7 387.52 0 633.48 106.58
Junc42 387.45 0 633.47 106.60
June 8 387.41 0 633.46 106.61
Junc9 387.08 0 633.42 106.74
June 18 393.26 0 640.32 107.05
June 35 394.3 0 643.07 107.79
June 15 387.03 0 636.07 107.91
June 16 386.78 0 636.47 108.19
June 17 386.45 0 637.00 108.56
June 20 388.48 0 640.12 109.04
June 6 387.54 0 639.64 109.24
June 19 387.53 0 640.32 109.53
June 22 393.16 0 645.97 109.54
June 5 388.04 0 643.07 110.50
June4 387.87 0 643.60 110.81
June 21 387.62 0 645.97 111.94
June 26 393.4 1000 652.97 112.47
June 49 398.29 0 657.98 112.53
June 12 398.29 0 658.02 112.54
June 3 386.25 0 647.14 113.04
June 23 387.33 0 648.80 113.29
June 2 386.92 0 648.42 113.31
Page 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I Page 2
Attachment 7
Node ID
Elevation
ft
Base Demand
GPM
Head
ft
Pressure
psi
June 31 389.13 500 653.48 114.54
Junc24 387.79 0 652.30 114.61
June 30 388.26 0 653.52 114.94
June 29 387.74 0 653.56 115.18
June 28 387.56 0 653.59 115.27
June 10 386.56 0 653.78 115.78
June 25 386.25 0 653.52 115.81
June 27 385.58 0 653.60 116.13
June 11 388.89 0 656.99 116.17
June 14 402.27 0 690.85 125.04
June 13 399.91 0 690.31 125.83
June 46 396.4 0 696.11 129.87
June 47 394 0 696.45 131.05
I
Ij
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L