HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-01-13; Housing Commission; ; AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT/MASTER PLAN - SAMBINB-ITEM 3
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
€45- APPLICATION DATE: 1/3/94
STAFF PERSON: Evan Becker
STAFF’ REPORT
JANUARY 13, 1994
HOUSING COMMISSION
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT/MASTER PLAN - SAMBI -
Request for recommendation of approval for development of 63
units of affordable rental housing within the SAMBI Master Plan. The project is
part of the development related to CT 92-02IPUD 92-03ISDP 92-06IHDP 92-03.
I. RECOMMENDATION
That the Housing Commission ADOPT Resolution No. 94-003 RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL of the development of the proposed 63 apartment units of affordable housing
within the SAMBI Master Plan.
11. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION
On December 15, 1993, Tokoyhara America, Inc. received a recommendation from the Planning
Commission for approval of a Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Planned Development Permit, Site
Development Plan and Hillside Development Permit to subdivide 129 single-family lots
subdivide and construct 76 townhomes and 72 condominium units, construct 72 apartment units
and designate two future community facility sites. The project is subject to the Inclusionary
Housing Requirement and the Density Bonus Ordinance which means that the applicant/
developer must provide a minimum of 63 units of housing affordable to low income households.
The applicant’s affordable housing proposal indicates that 63 of the 72 proposed apartment units
will be affordable to lower income households at 80% of the county median.
In addition, the project is required to provide at least 10% of lower income units in three (3)
bedrooms. The applicant is proposing that twelve (12) 3 bedroom units be restricted to low
income households; this exceeds the City’s requirement.
The affordable housing project, as proposed, will meet the Applicant/Master Plan Developer’s
obligation under the City of Carlsbad’s Inclusionary Housing and Density Bonus Ordinances.
Sambi Seaside Heights
Housing Commission - 1/13/94
Page 2
III. APPLICANT/DEVELOPER TEAM INFORMATION
The development team for the proposed affordable housing project is as follows:
Amlicant : Toyohara America, Inc.
Developer: Toyohara America, Inc.
Architect: Kunio Inoue
LandscaDe Architect: Planning Systems/Steve Ahles
Eng;ineer(s) : Land Space Engineering/Alex Pantich
Planning; Consultant: Don Agatep (Applicant Agent)
IV. AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION
The project will be located 1/4 mile north of Poinsettia Lane on the northeast corner of future
Alga Road and future extension of Camino De Las Ondas. The parcel number for the property
is 214-140-07 (eastern 25% of site).
The project will provide 63 apartment units which will include ten studio (551 sq.ft); ten 1-
bedroom units (713 sq.ft. each); thirty-one 2-bedroom units (887 to 985 sq.ft. each); and, twelve
3-bedroom units (1017 sq.ft. each).
Special amenities of the project will include two covered parking spaces per unit, tot lot/wading
pool, five (5) BBQ areas, adult pool/spa, multi-purpose play areas and separate basketball/
volleyball facilities.
The design and quality of the affordable housing units will be consistent with that of the
proposed market rate apartment units.
V. TERMS OF AFF'ORDABILITY
The applicant has proposed that the 63 condominium units remain affordable for thirty (30) years
for families at the following income level:
0 63 of the total 72 apartment units will be affordable to households at 80% of the county
median.
Sambi Seaside Heights
Housing Commission - 1/13/94
Page 3
The following chart provides a breakdown of bedroom sizes by income levels:
Bedroom Size 80% of median
The Master Plan will be completed in a single phase. The applicant has proposed to build the
affordable housing units within five (5) years of recordation of the Final Map. In an affordable
housing agreement with the City of Carlsbad, an acceptable time frame for actual construction
of the units will be specified.
As proposed, the maximum rents (as shown above) for one and two bedroom units are too high
based on current income levels and rental rate calculations. The one bedroom rent should be no
more than $673 per month and for two bedrooms no more than $834 per month. The applicant
will be required to maintain rents at the city-approved rent levels based on applicable household
size for each restricted unit.
VI. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
The applicant intends to privately finance the construction of the 63 units of affordable
apartment. The applicant is requesting no financial assistance from the City to construct the units
for low income (80% of county median) households, as the project is proposed within the
application.
VII. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
Based on review of the preliminary proforma submitted by the applicant, the projected
construction and operation costs for the proposed affordable housing project appear to be
reasonable based on the current assumptions. At the time the units are constructed, the
assumptions may change. However, regardless of changes in construction and operational costs,
the applicant will be required at all times to set rental rates which do not exceed the maximum
allowed for related household size (i.e., 1 person, 2 persons, etc.). .
Sambi Seaside Heights
Housing Commission - 1/13/94
Page 4
The applicant will be required to enter into an affordable housing agreement with the City prior
to Final Map approval. The agreement will outline all final assumptions on the cost of the
project and the rents to be set for the restricted units.
VIII. CONSISTENCY WITH HOUSING ELEMENT AND CHAS
The proposed affordable housing project is consistent with the policies and programs of the
Housing Element, Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, Density Bonus Ordinance and the Zone 20
Specific Plan. The applicant has proposed to provide 63 units of affordable housing which meets
the 15 % Inclusionary Housing Requirement and additional 5 % density bonus requirement for
the market rate units. The number of 3 bedroom units (12 total) in the project exceeds the City's
10 % requirement.
The proposed affordable rental housing project meets a "Priority 2" need of the City of
Carlsbad, as outlined within the City of Carlsbad's 1993-98 Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy (CHAS). The level 2 priority indicates that there is a significant need for
the proposed type of housing within the City of Carlsbad.
M. SUMMARY
The Sambi Seaside Heights Affordable Rental Housing Project, as proposed, is consistent with
the Housing Element and meets the needs of lower income small and large families. Therefore,
staff is recommending that the Housing Commission adopt a recommendation to the City Council
for approval of the subject affordable housing project with the following conditions: 1) the
applicant shall provide an acceptable construction schedule to the City for the affordable units
(as related to construction of market rate units within the Master Plan); 2) the applicant shall
maintain rents at the allowable affordable rate (based on household size) for low income
households with incomes equal to 80% of the county median; and, 3) the affordable housing
units must be restricted for "the useful life of the project"; the City of Carlsbad interprets this
to mean a minimum of 55 years.
X. EXHIBITS
1 - Housing Commission Resolution No. 94-003 adopting a recommendation to the City
Council to approve the Sambi Seaside Heights Affordable Rental Housing Project.
2 - Housing Commission Review Application submitted by Toyohara America Inc.\Don
Agatep & Associates.
3 - Planning Commission Staff Report dated December 15, 1993.
4 - Site Development Plan for proposed Affordable Housing Project.
-. EXHIBIT 2
DONALD A. AGATEP & ASSOCIATES
City 19 Regional Planning Consultants
December 3 1 , 1 993
Housing & Redevelopment Director
City of Carlsbad
2965 Roosevelt St Carlsbad, CA 92008
Re: Sam bi Seaside Heights CT 92-02, Housing Commission Review Application,
Toyohara America Inc., Developer
The referenced applicaion for City of Carlsbad Housing Commission Review is submitted to
satisfy Sambi Seaside Height's obligation to comply with the City of Carlsbad General Plan Housing Element by providing a fair share of affordable housing within the project, in the City
of Carlsbad's Southwest quadrant ; and, with Growth Management Zone 20 Specific Plan.
The Sambi Seaside Heights project, CT 92-02PUD 92-03/SDP 93-06, is comprised of 349
units on 68+ ac, located easterly of future Hidden Valley Road, northerly of future Camino de
las Ondas, between the future City of Carlsbad Poinsettia Park facility and the SDG&E
Easement to the east. Sambi Seaside Heights is requesting a 11.8% density bonus,
therefore; 20% or 63 units, are designated as lower-income afforadable "Rental" housing
units, and located in the proposed 72 unit Garden Apartment portion of the project.
The proposed affordable housing units provide a mix of 10 studiohachelor units,
10 one bedroom units, 31 two bedroom units & 12 three bedroom units (10% of affdble units).
The affordable units are intended to be available for retired & semi retired couples, young
couples and young families.
The Planning Commission reviewed the Sambi Seaside Heights project at Public Hearing
Dec 15, 1993 and recommended approval, P.C. Resos 3591,3592,3593 & 3594.
The Sambi Seaside Heights project meets the housing need and priorities of the City of
Carlsbad General Plan Housing Element, Growth Management Zone 20 Specific Plan - SP
203) objectives and is consistent with the City of Carlsbad lnclusionary Housing Ordinance for
the following reasons:
Compliance with City of Carlsbad Houslng Element Goals:
Sambi Seaside Heights' design is compatible with the existing residential
units to the south and is architecturally designed in the same manner and
style as the proposed market rate units
"Goal #2 Sambi Seaside Heights will provide 63 units to renters who can pay but 80%
or less of their median income per year allocated for housing costs within the
City of Carlsbad.
"Goal #1
DABmbi /12131/93
2956 Roosevelt Street Post Office Box 590 Cmkbad Califmnia 92008 (619) 434-1056 fa (619) 434-81
Sambi Seaside Heights- CT 92-02
Housing Commission Review Appl
Dec31,1993
City of Carlsbad Housing Element Goals (cont'd):
"Goal #3 Sambi Seaside Heights provides a mix of housing sizes in an larger project
and in close proximity to City facilities: i.e. proposed Alga Rd extension
northerly from Poinsettia Lane & future Poinsettia Park to the west,
"Goal #4 Sambi Seaside Heights is within 112 mile of commercial facilites (Poinsettia & 1-5) to
the west; public transportation routes (future Hidden Valley Rd between PAR &
Camino de las Ondaslfuture Alga Rd) and; employment opportunities.
and enforced by an Affordable Housing Agreement to be approved prior to
CT 92-02 Final Map recordation.
"Goal # 5 Sambi Seaside Heights will comply with open housing practices as required
Compliance with Growth Management Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP-203)
Ord #NS-257:
O Sambi Seaside Heights provides on site lower-income (80%) affordable units
integrated with the proposed 349 unit Sambi seaside Heights project.
O The Sambi Seaside Heights project is coordinated with surrounding properties by
providing major Circulation Element Roadways (Alga Rd) as well as circulation and
pedestrian access to Public Facilities including Poinsettia Park, from PAR & Camino de
las Ondas.
O The proposed affordable units are compatible with proposed & existing multi-family
land uses to the south & west. " Sambi Seaside Heights provides an attractive, well buffered project serving the unit
resident as well as the neighboring residents
O Sam bi Seaside Heights provides on site active and passive recreational ammenities.
Compliance with lnclusionary Housing Ordinance 21.85 010 CMC:
O Sambi Seaside Heights provides 20% of the total project for affordable (lower -
income) residential units. The project complies with Zone 20 Specific Plan & General
Plan Housing Element. " 10% of the project reserved for lower income households (1 2 units) have 3 bedrooms.
We believe the Sambi Seaside Heights project complies withlor exceeds applicable City of
Carlsbad General Plan Housing Policies, Growth Management Zone 20 Development policies and
the Purpose & Intent of the City of Carlsbad lnclusionary Housing Ordinance.
On behalf of Toyohara America Inc. I respectfully request the City of Carlsbad Housing
Commission Staff accept the Sambi Seaside Heights application and schedule the matter before
Carlsbad's Housing Commission Jan 13, 1994
fw!p~su,tant
on Agatep, Panni
Toyohara America In4 Developer Representative
cc: K. Kawakita, Pres. , Toyohara America Inc, Owner/Applicant
DAISmbill2/31 A33
2956 Roosevelt Street Post Office Box 590 Cmlsbad CdifMtliu 92008 (61 9) 434-1 056 fa (61 9) 434-81
- -
CITY OF CARLSBAD
HOUSING COMMISSION REVIEW APPLICATION
1. APPLlCANT/DEVELO€’~ TEAM INFORMATION
Name of Applicant: TQYOHARA mCA INc
Mailing Address: 8649 FIRJZXWE BLVD
DOIWNEY, CA 90241
TeleDhone No.: (31 0) 861 -3808
Identify Development Team (ie., developer, builder, architect, etc.):
1 ) Toyohara America Inc, ; K.Kawakita pres - D-P!ZR
2) Planning Consultant- Agatep
3) Civil Engineer -Land Space Engineering/ Alex Pantich
4) Architect- Kunio Inoue, AIA
5) Landscape Architect - Planning Systems/ Steve Ahles,
II. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name: SAMBI SEASIDE HEIGHTS
Describe General Location of Project: 1/4 mile north ofPoinsettia In;
future extension of Camino de las Bndas.
Northeast corner of future Alga Rd &
East- 25% Of APN 214-140-07
Project Address: Northeast comer of future Alga Rd & future Camino de las Ondas
Site Parcel No(s).: Lot 133 of Vesting TOM, CT 92-02/PUD 92-03
Total Number of Affordable Units Required (if applicable):
Total Number of Affordable Units Proposed:
Type of Units (ie., garden apartments, detached, etc.):
63 units
63 affordable units of 72 apartment units
m-oposed 72 unit Garden Appartment Project
Size (in square feet) of each Unit: Bldg Typ I = Unit A 551 sqft/studio; Unit B-lEd/1&(713 sqft)
Bedroommbution of Units:
Unit C- 2E!d/2Ba (985 sqft); Unit E- 3€?d/2Ba (1017 ssft)
B
10 X 551 sqft (16%); 1OX 1 Bd-713 ssft (16%); 31 2Bd/Ba (both types)= 49%
.-a e. . - m SC/ILJ
Describe any special featuredameniks to be included within project: ~- Sambi- Garden ApAments provides: Unobstructed views of the back country, 2 covered parking spaces, totlot/wading po 5 BEQ areas, Adult pool/spa, Multi-purpose play areas & seperate Basketball/
Volleyball Facility
L
Housing Commission Review Application
Page 1 1218 93
- -
IU. TERMS OF AFFORDABILITY FOR AFFORDABLE UNITS (ATTACH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IF
NECESSARY)
Targeted Income Levels (as % of area median): 80%
Target Population (ie., families, seniors, etc): Semi-retired, young co*les/young familes
Monthly -(by bdr. size) or- Price of Units: Bldg Typ I 551 sqft Unit A = $499/m Bldq typ I1 2Bd/Ba 887 ssft =$840/
1 Bd/Ba-731 sqft Unit B = $720/m0 Unit D 2 Bd/~a-985 sqft Unit Q = $91O/m0
3 Bd/Ba=l017 qft nit E = $935/m0
~~ ~~~
Term of Affordability (ie., 30 yrs, life of project, etc.): 30 yrs
Projected Schedule for Construction of Affordable Housing Units:
within 5 yrs of recordation of Final Map
~
If the affordable units are being constructed to satisfy the City of Carlsbad's Inclusionary Housing requirement, how
will they be phased with respect to construction of the market rate units? Please Explain Project Phasing:
Single Phase- within 5 yrs of recordation of Final Map
IV. FINANCIAL INFORMATION ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT
0
Page 2 12/8/93
Please attach a copy of development and operating financial proformas showing sources and uses of funds to
accomplish the affordable units proposed in this application. In the proformas, please identify your subsidy sources
and appropriate justifications for use of these sources.
Describe the local financial assistance or incentives, if any, including specific terms desired for the affordable housing
project which you are, or will be, requesting from the City of Carlsbad:
~~
Identify any other project conditions which may be relevant to project feasibility:
Project affordability could be enhaneedby:
1) Reducing City of Carlsbad Impact Fees
2) Modification to Carlsbad District Fees for "AffordA$@le Vnits" especially
units and units for semi-retired individuals.
Housing Commission Review Application
- -
V. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS TO APPLICATION
The following items must be attached to this application:
0 Site Development Plan for Affordable Housing Units;
0 Narrative describing how the,project meets the Housing Needs and Priorities as expressed within the City of
Carlsbad's Housing Element and Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy;
0 Narrative on the project's consistency with the City of Carlsbad's Affordable Housing Policies as expressed in the
Housing Element, Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, General Plan and other related documents;
0 Development and Operating Financial Proformas indicating sources and uses of funds for the project, including
justification and identification of subsidy sources;
0 Complete description of financial assistance or incentives including specific terms that are, or will be requested from
the City of Carlsbad for the project, if applicable; and,
0
VI. APPLICATION SIGNATURES
Completed Disclosure Statement of Ownership Interests within the project.
Propert Owner Name Address and Telephone No.: 46YoHARA AMhCA INC 8649 Firestone Blvd, Downey, CA 90241 (31 0) 861 -3808 I, the undersigned, do hereby certify that I am the legal owner of the subject property and that the above information
is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
I, the undersigned applicant, do hereby certify that I am the representative of the legal owner of the subject property
and that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant Don Agatep, , America, Inc
Signature: Date Dec 31, 93
THE BOX BELOW IS FOR CITY USE 0
Date Application Received- A/w
Application Received By: ' o& Fa
Staff Recommendation: APPROVAL LJ/ CWO/ TIOuQ
Date of Housing Commission Review:
Action on Application by Housing Commission:
Other Comments:
I /[z /?C/
AHP wcl-3
Housing Commission Review Application
Page 3 1218 93
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
I
r?PLICAmS STATEVErCT OF 31SCLDSURE OF CERTAIN OWNERSHIP INTERESTS ON ALL APPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REOUIFE
ZlSCfiETIONARY ACTICN CN TnE PART OF THE Crpl COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD. COMMlSSlON OR CCMMflTEE
I
{Please Print)
*, 0. $6. ., The following information must be disilosed:
1. Applicant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
TOYOIIARA AMERICA, Inc c/o nnnrt1r-I A AGATFP
(DBA) Sunbelt Planning Co. 3355 Roosevelt S t Y1 8641 Pirestone Blvd Downey, CA 90241 ..'. Carlsbad, CA 32008 ,? t ....
2.
3.
4.
Owner
List the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved. .
TOYOI-IABA AM F,RTCA Inc.
(DBA) Sunbelt Plannlng Co.
8641 Firestone Blvd
Downey, CA 902~11
If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names anc addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
Seizo 3. TOYOHARA ; Chaim of the Board 10355 Brookshire Ave
Downey, CA 76241
Kink0 K. TOYOXARA ; Director, Secretary
Same as above
Kazuyuki KAWAKITA; Director, President
11432 Hanover Ct., Cerritos, Ca. 90701
~ Sayoko AOYAGI; Treasurer
16510 Stonehaven Ct.
La Mirada, Ca. 90638
If any person identMed pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary
cf the trust.
.- '. .
D isc I os u r e stat em &At < .LI. .
I.
' (Over)
Page 2
5. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of City sta!f. 2CaiCS
Commissions; Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
Yes - NoXX - If yes, please indicate perscn(s)
I Pewon 13 defined as: 'Any individual. firm, Copartnership. joint venture. association. social club, frnternal organization. corporation. estate. :rust. I receiver. syndicate, this and any othor county. crty and county. Crty municipalrty. dirtricl or other political subdivlalon. or any other group or
combination acting as a unt'
I
i
I
(NOTE: Anach additional pages. as necessary.) . .. . .
.I .. _-- ..._ , I' . ..
'I
IIIROMICHI TOYOHARA IITWMT(-"T mOynHAR4 ,
Print or rype name of owner Print or type name of applicant
FRM00013 8/90
TOYuHAM AMERICA GhdUP
DDA 5!Nlbi of Tokyo
WEST COAST JACKSON INC.
COAST RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT
SUNDELT PLANNING CO. JAPAN SHIATSU CENTER OF U.S.A INC.
8649 FIRESTONE DOULNARD, DOWNN, CALIFORNIA 90241, PHONE (213) 861 -3808, FAX (213) 861-9432
February 14, 1992
City of Carlsbad
and
Property Owners of Zone 20
To whom it may concern,
RE: Designation of Representative for TOYOHARA AMERICA
INC. dba SUNBELT PLANNING CO. APN 214-140-07
TOYOHARA AMERICA, INC. dba SUNBELT PLANNING CO. hereby
authorizes DONALD A. AGATEP, Planning Consultant, to represent our interest in all matters relating to:
1) The alignment, financing and construction College
Blvd. through our properties, and for Poinsettia
Lane as it may impact the property.
2) Impacts of the Local Facilities Plan for Zone 20
on our ownership.
3) Processing all discretionary actions required by
the City of Carlsbad to develop our 68+ property
including but not limited to;
a) Applications for a Tentative Subdivision Map
b) Applications for a Planned Development/Site
c) Applications for development approval from the
Development Plan
California Coastal Commission, if required.
In addition to correspondence sent ,to our address, please
send all notices of issues.or meetings to Mr. Agatep, P.O. BOX 590, Carlsbad, Ca. 92008, Phone (619)434-1056,
so that we will be represented in the above matters.
Thank you for your cooperation.
TOYOHARA AMERICA, INC.
dba SUNBELT PLANNING CO.
CC: City of Carlsbad
Jack Henthorn & Associates
HEAD OFFICE 2-1-2 WICHO, CHIYODA-KU, TOKYO, JAPAN, PHOHE 03 (253) 191 1, FAX 03 (258) 0848
Dec 31, 1993
PRELIMINARY SAMBI SEASIDE HEIGHTS PROFORMA CT 92-02PUD 92-03
63 Unit Affordable Housing Rental Apts
Affordable Cos t Bldg Typ I Bldg Typ I Bldg Typ II Bldg Typ I Bldg Typ I
Studio 1 Bdrm 2 Bdrm 2 Bdrm 3 Bdrm
550 713 sqft 887 ssft 985sqft 1017sqft
Affordable Hsg Mix 10 10 19 12 12
Percentage of 63 Units 16% 1 6% 30% 19% 19%
A. PROJECT COS T
1) Bldg cost @ $45/Sqft $24,750
2) On-Site lmprmt $ 6,387
3) Off-Site lmprmt $ 2.185
Sub total $33,522
4) Bldr's Profit 10% $ 3,352
5) Arch/Plng/Eng @lo% $ 2.475
6) Impact Fees (Apts) $1 0,387
7) Contingencty @lo% $ 3.352
Sub total $53,088
8) Cnst Int/Carry @ 9% $ 398
9) Land Cost -
TOTAL $53,486
$32,085
$ 6,387
L2aL $40,647
$ 3,208
$1 1,056
$ 4.064
$63,039
$ 473
4i-Am-L $6331 2
$ 4,064
$39,915
$ 6,387 m $48,487
$ 4,848
$ 3,991
$1 1,707 u.tm $73,881
$ 554 $l2QQ- $74,435
$44,325
$ 6,387 $2.xi $52,897
$ 5,289
$ 4,325
$1 2,087
&5289 $79,887
$ 599 $-AaL $80,486
$45,765
$ 6,387 m $54,337
$ 5,433
$ 4,576
$1 2,209
L5s3 $81,998
$ 615 u $82,613
B. PAYMENTS
1) Mrtg @ 8% $ 393.12 $ 466.81 $ 547.10 $ 591.57 $ 607.20
($7.3561 000.00)
2) Tax/lns @ 1.5% $-!2mw $ 93.04 $ 100.61 $ 103.26 Subtotal $ 459.98 $ 546.20 $ 640.14 $ 692.18 $ 710.46
3) Mgmtmsvr @25% $ 115.00 $ 136.55 $ 173.05 $ 177.62
Sub-Total $ 474.97 $ 682.75 $ 800.17 $ 865.23 $ 888.07
4) Less Vacancy @ 5% $ 23.75 $ 34.14 $ 40.OQ $ 43.26 $ 44.40
Mo Pymt $ 498.72 $716.90 $ 840.17 $ 908.49 $ 932.47
C. AFRD MO RENT
(93 Csbd Aff Hsg Schd)
Difference $ 86.25 4 43.8% 4 6.17> <$ 74.50, $ 30.53
80 % of Median $585.00 $673.00 $834.00 $834.00 $963.00
COMMENTS:
Prepared by D. Agatep/Sambi Seaside Heights.
DABmbi-Prfmall 0/15/93
Dee 31 , 1993
Rev Jan 5, 1994
PRELIMINARY SAMBI SEASIDE HEIGHTS PROFORMA
CT 92-02/PUD 92-03 63 Unit Affordable Housing Rental Apts
Bldg Typ I Bldg Typ II Bldg Typ I Bld Typ I Studio 1 Bdrm 2 Bdrm 2 Bdrm 3 drm 550 sqft 71 3 sqft 887 sqft 985 sqft 1017 sqft i! Affordable Cost Bldg Typ I
Affordable Hsg Mix 10 10 19 12 12 Percentage of 63 Units 16% 16% 30% 19?h 1 9%
A. PROJECT COST
1) Bldg cost @ $40/Sqft @ $38/Sqft 2) On-Site lmprmt 3) Off-Site lmprmt Sub total 4) Bldr's Profit 10% 5) Arch/Plng/Eng @ 10% 6) Impact Fees (Apts) 7) Contingenct @lo% lub total 8) Cnst IntlCarry @ 10% 6 mos 9) Land Cost TOTAL
$22,000
$ 5,400 $ 1.400 $28,800 $ 2,880
$ 2,200 $1 0.387
$ 2:880 $47,147
$28,520 $35,480 $37,430 $38,650
$ 1.400 $45,450 $ 1.400 $ 1.400 m $35,320 $42,280 $44,230 $ 3,532 $ 4,228 $ 4,423 $ 4,545 $ 2,850 $ 3,548 $ 3,743 $ 3,865 $1 1,056 $1 1,707 $1 2,087 $12,209 $ 3.352 $ 4.228 $ 4.423 $ 4.545 $56,292 $65,991 $68,906 $70,614
$ 5,400 $ 5,400 $ 5,400 $ 5,400
$ 1.959 $ 2,319 $ 2,699 $ 2,816 $ 2,883 9; '000 $.-.Am $ 000 $ 000 $ 000 $49,106 $58,611 $68,690 $71,722 $73,497
B. PAYMENTS
1) Mttg @ 8% $ 361.00 $ 431.00 $ 505.00 $ 527.00 $ 540.00
2) Tax/lns @ 1.5% $ 61.00 $ 73.00 $ 86.00 3iAQ-QQ $ 92.00 Sub total $ 422.00 $ 504.00 $ 590.00 $ 617.00 $ 632.00
$ 148.00 $ 154.00 $ 178.00 3) Mgmt/Rsvr @25% $ 106.00 $ 126.00 Sub-Total $ 528.00 $ 630.00 $ 738.00 $ 771.00 $ 810.00
($7.35/$1000.00)
4) Less Vacancy @ 5% $ 26.00 $ 31.00 $ 44.00 $ 39.00 w
Mo Pymt $554.00 $661 .OO $782.00 $81 0.00 $850.00
C. AFRD MO RENT
80 % of Median $585.00 $673.00 $834.00 $834.00 $963.00
(93 Csbd Aff Hsg Schd)
Prepared by D. AgatepBambi Seaside Heights.
DA/Smbi-Affd-Prfma/l2/31193- REV 115t94
- EXHIBIT 3
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
1.
DECEMBER 15, 1393
APPLICATION COMPLETE DATE:
JULY a. 1992
STAFF PLANNER: JEFF GIBSON :L;i-
/ STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03 - SAMBI - Request for
recommendation of approval for a Conditional Negative Declaration, a
Vesting Tentative Tract Map, Plamed Development Permit, Site Development
Plan, and Hillside Development Permit to subdivide 129 single-family lots,
subdivide and construct 76 townhQmes and 72 condominium units, construct 72 apartment units, and designate two future community facility sites, all on
property generally located east of Paseo del Norte, north of Camino de las
Ondas, and south of Palomar Airport Road, in the RD-M-Q Zone and R-1-
l0,COO-Q Zone in Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20.
RECOMMENDATION
That the PlarJling Cornmission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 3590
recommending APPROVAL of the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and
ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 3591,3592,3593, and 3594, recommending
APPROVAL of CT 92-02, PUD 92-03, SDP 92-06, and HDP 92-03, based on the findings
and subject to the conditions contained therein.
11. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting recommendation of approval for a Vesting Tentative Tract Map,
Planned Development Permit, Site Development Plan, and Hillside Development Permit to
subdivide 129 single-family lots, subdivide and construct 76 townhomes and 72
condominium units, construct 72 apartment units, and designate two future community
facility sites, all on property generally located east of Paseo del Norte, north of Camino de
las Ondas, and south of Palomar Airport Road. The parcel is'located in the Coastal Zone,
totals 68.5 gross acres, is undeveloped, and a majority of the site is currently under
agricultural cultivation.
The property has a split zoning and General Plan Land Use designation. The property is
located in the Residential Density-Multiple Zone with the Qualified Overlay Zone (RD-M-Q)
and in the One-Family Residential Zme with the Qualified Overlay Zone (R-1-10,000-Q).
'rhe General Plan Land Use designation is Residential Medium (RM) and Residential
Medium Low (RLM). In addition, the project is subject to the requirements of the Zone
20 Specific Plan (SP 203) and Final Environmental Impact Report 90-3.
CT 92-02/PUD 92-O3/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15,1993
PAGE 2
The applicant is processing a vesting tentative map which is different from a tentative map. When a local agency, such as the City, approves a vesting tentative map, State law and
local ordinance (Title 20) stipulates that the approval.of the map confers a vested right to
proceed with the development in substantial compliance with the local ordinances, policies,
and standards in effect at the time the application was deemed complete. It is a vested
guarantee that if an ordinance or standard changes before the vesting tentative map is
finaled or building permits issued, the project would not be subject to the new
requirements.
,b shown on Exhibits "A" - 'YYY', the project is divided into four different land use areas
as follows:
Area ffAf' - In the eastern portion of the site, east of future Alga Road, there would be: (1)
a 1.3 acre future community facility site and a natural open space area with a Citywide
trail link; (2) a 72 unit condominium development with two-story buildings, dwelling
units ranging in size from 858 to 1,375 square feet, two-car garages and carports, guest
parking, and a central recreational facility with a pool and club house; and (3) a 72 unit,
two-story, apartment development with one, two, and three-bedroom units ranging in size
from 551 to 1,017 square feet, carports and guest parking, and several recreational areas
including a pool and a tot lot.
Area "B" - In the central portion of the site, directly west of firture Alga Road, there would
be 40 single-family lots ranging in size from 10,000 to 28,300 square feet and a 42,000
square feet future community facility site.
Area "C' - Also in the central portion of the site, located west of Area "B", there would be
89 single-family lots ranging in size from 7,500 to 11,800 square feet.
Area I'D" - In the western portion of the site, adjacent to future Hidden Valley Road, there
would be 76, two-story townhouse units, ranging in size from 2,010 to 2,350 square feet,
with two-car garages, guest parking, and a central recreational facility with a pool and club
house.
A majority of the project would feature contemporary architecture consisting of Spanish tile
roofs with varying roof lines, and stucco exteriors. Area "D" would have townhomes with
contemporary architecture and metal seamed roofs to be more compatible with the
architecture and materials proposed for the buildings in future Poinsettia Community Park
located directly west of the project site.
Per the requirements of the City's recently adopted Inclusionary Housing Ordinance, 15% of the proposed dwelling units (47 affordable units) must be provided for lower income
households. However, because the applicant is requesting a Density Bonus, 20% of the
total dwelling units (63 affordable units) must be reserved as affordable to lower income
households. The applicant is proposing to provide those affordable dwelling units within
the apartment portion of the project (Area "A"). The project would be conditioned to
require an Affordable Housing Agreement that would be submitted for review and approval
by the City prior to Final Map approval.
CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15,1993
PAGE 3
Access to the project would be provided by the northern extension of Alga Road from it's
current intersection at Poinsettia Lane and from Hidden Valley Road which would extend
from Camino de las Ondas north along the project's western boundary and connect with
Palomar Airport Road to the north.
The surrounding neighborhood is undeveloped with vacant land on all four sides. The
future Poinsettia Community Park would be located directly west on the opposite side of
future Hidden Valley Road.
[II. ANALYSIS
The proposed project is subject to the following land use plans, and ordinances:
A. Carlsbad General Plan: Land Use Element - (Residential Medium Low (RLM)
and Residential Medium (RM) Land Use Designations); Open Space
Element; and Housing Element;
B. Zone 20 Specific Plan (Specific Plan 203);
C. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 21;
1. Chapter 21.45, Planned Development;
2. Chapter 21.53, Section 21.53.120 - Site Development Plan -
"Affordable Housing" and Chapter 21.06 - Qualified Overlay Zone;
3. Chapter 21.95, Hillside Development Regulations;
4. Chapter 21.85, Inclusionary Housing;
5. Chapter 21.86, Density Bonus;
D. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 20, Subdivision Ordinance; and the Ca&mia
Subdivision Map Act;
E. Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coastal Program;
F. Growth Management (Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20);
G. Carlsbad Municipal Code, Title 19, Environmental Protection Procedures; and
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI DECEMBER 15,1993
PAGE 4
LAND USE ELEMENT
The property has a Residential Medium (RM) and Residential Medium Low (RLM) General
Plan Land Use Designation. The RM designation allows the development of low density
apartment, condominium, or townhome developments that range in density from 4 to 8
dudacre with a 6 dudacre growth management control point. The RLM designation allows single-family homes that range in density from 0 to 4 dwelling units per acre with
a 3.2 dus/acre growth control point. The net density in the RLM portion of the project is
9.18 dwelling units per acre and the net density in the RM portion is 4.4 dwelling units
per acre. The project contains a combhation of apartments, townhomes, condominiums,
and single-family homes all developed at an overall net density of 5.8 dus/acre, therefore,
the project, exclusive of the density bonus request, is consistent with the growth
management dwelling unit allowance for the parcel.
OPEN SPACE AM> CONS~VATION ELEMENT
The property contains no existing or approved General Plan open space, however, the Zone
20 Specific Plan designates open space in the very northeastern comer of the property.
This specific plan designated open space also corresponds with the conceptual open space
associated with a greenway and a planned trail system link per the open space exhibits
found in the City's Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan (OSCRMP).
This project is consistent with the OSCRMP and Zone 20 Specific Plan in that: (1) a 20
foot wide trail easement would be provided to accommodate Trail Segment No. 30 within
the SDG&E powerline easement; and, (2) the project would also preserve in protected open
space the steep coastal sage covered slopes located in the northeastern comer of the
project.
HOUSING ELEMENT
All residential development within the Zone 20 Specific Plan is required to include a
percentage of housing units affordable to persons and families of lower income. Consistent
with the policies and programs of the Housing Element and subsequent to the affordable
housing requirements of the Zone 20 Specific Plan the project would provide 15% or 47
apartment units available and affordable to lower income households. In addition, and
consistent with Housing Element Policy 3.2 the project would provide at least 10% of the
lower income units with three or more bedrooms.
CT 92-O2/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
PAGE 5
' DECEMBER 15, 1993
B. ZONE 20 SPEClFIC PLAN (SPECIFIC PLAN 203)
The Zone 20 Specific Plan provides a framework for the development of the vacant
properties within Zone 20 to ensure the logical and efficient provision of public facilities
and community amenities for the future residents of the planning area. This project meets
the goals and objectives of the specific plan for the following reasons:
The project conforms to all aspects of the General Plan and applicable City
ordinances, regulations and policies.
As conditioned the project provides coordination between surrounding developments
through the provision of roadway connections with properties to the north, east,
south, and west.
The residential land uses are compatible with the existing multi-family residential
land uses to the south and the future community park to the west.
The project implements the objective of an integrated open space and trail system
within the planning area.
The project provides an attractive, well buffered, and landscaped circulation system
that safely and aesthetically provides for the needs of automobiles, cyclists,
pedestrians and adjacent land uses.
The provision of the following land uses creates a well planned, yet diversified
community: (1) single-family lots ranghg in size from 7,500 to over 10,000 square
feet; (2) higher density multi-family townhomes located near a community park
(Poinsettia Park) and a non-loaded collector street (Hidden Valley Rd.); (3) two future community facility sites (potential church and daycare) located adjacent to
a major roadway (Alga Road); (4) higher density condominium units located
adjacent to a community facility site and natural open space; and (5) apartment
units available to low income households located adjacent to a major circulation
element roadway (Alga Road) and natural open space.
The project would provide two community facility sites along future Alga Road.
The 1.31 acre site on the east side of the road is designated for a potential church
site. Because this site does not have a minimum of 2 net useable acres, as required
by the specific plan, staff recommends that a conditional use permit be approved by
the Planning Commission prior to development of the site. The .9 acre site located
on the west side of the Alga Road is designated for a potential day care facility.
This site meets the location and .5 acre size criteria established by the specific plan,
therefore, staff recommends that no further discretionary action be required to
develop the site with a day care use.
CT 92-OZ/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15,1993
PAGE 6
The project is located h Planning Area "A" of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and complies with
the required "Specid Design Criteria" as follows:
An average 50 foot setback from Alga Road would be provided.
Noise mitigation measures for the single-family homes, condominium units, and
apartments units impacted by traffic noise from Alga Road would be provided.
Enhanced landscaping would be provided along Hidden Valley Road and Alga Road,
and on the manufactured slopes between the terraced building pads.
The building elevations for the single-family homes, townhomes, condominium
units, and apartment buildings all would have a variety of materials, architectural
accent features, articulated wall and roof planes, varying roof heights and building
massing, and street setbacks. The various site plans would also have curvilinear
streets to follow the natural contours and to provided visual interest within the
project.
CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE. TITLE 21:
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 21.45:
The utilization of the Planned Development Ordinance in conjunction with the vesting
tentative tract map for this project allows for the following: (1) use of private gate
guarded streets in the single-family portion of the project; (2) provides a method to
approve separate ownership of the 72 air space condominium units located within the
multiple-unit buildings in Area "A" and the 76 postage-stamp townhouse lots located in
Area "D"; and, (3) allows for the development of multi-family residential development in
an R-1-10,OOO Zone in Area "AIi. Before the Planning Commission recommends approval
of the project to the City Council, Title 21 of the Municipal Code under Section 21.45.072
requires that the following findings be made:
a. 'The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent .with
Chapter 21.45, the Zone 20 Specific Plan, and all adopted plans of the City and
other governmental agencies."
The project is consistent with Chapter 21.45, the Zone 20 Specific Plan, the General
Plan, and the Local Coastal Program, because it meets all the Planned Development
standards, and single-family and multi-family residential land uses would be
developed at the appropriate lot size and residential density. See Section A under
General Plan, Section B under Specific Plan, and Section F under Mello I1 for a more
detailed discussion on compliance with these three land use plans.
CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 7
b. 'The proposed use is necessary and desirable to provide a dce or facility which
will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the neighborhood and the
community."
The development of two community facility sites, single-family lots, condominiums,
townhomes, and apartments would provide a balance and mix of land uses within
the Zone 20 Specific Plan. A majority of the residential development planned for
the specific plan area would be standard single-family homes on 7,500 to 10,000
square foot lots. The development of higher density multi-family units in close
proximity to natural open space, Poinsettia Community Park, and future Alga Road,
in addition to the provision of apartment units affordable to -lower income
household would create a more diversified and balanced community.
C. "Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity."
The project is designed to preserve the coastal sage scrub habitat located along the
eastern portion of Area "A'. This open space would connect with the larger open
space located in the central canyon. Drainage facilities would be provided
concurrent with development of the project to reduce erosion and flooding. All
manufactured slopes would be landscaped to prevent erosion and to visually screen
the slopes.
d. 'The proposed planned development meets all of the minimum development
standards set forth in Section 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in Section
21.45.080, and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the
Design Guidelines Manual."
i. The local streets in the single-family portion of the project would have curb,
gutter, and sidewalks on both sides, and have 36 to 40 feet of paving. This
exceeds the 30 foot minimum private street width standard.
ii. The project would provide a mixture of one and two-story homes, and the
multi-family buildings would have varied roof lines, and a variety of front
building elevations and front yard setbacks.
iii. Adequate recreational vehicle storage space would be provided within the
individual projects and be sufficiently screened from the public right-of-way
and surrounding properties.
CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 8
iv. The single-family homes would have, at a rnhimurn two car garages which
would meet the parking and storage requirements of the ordinance, and
guest parking would be provided on both sides of the streets. The
condominiums and townhomes all have two covered parking spaces,
including garages and carports for residents, and guest parking is dispersed
along the internal driveways.
PRIVATE STREET &
DRIVEWAY WIDTH
DRIVEWAY AND
STREET SETBACK
v. The project complies with the Planned Development Ordinance as follows:
I REQUIRED PROPOSED
30 Feet 30 to 45 Feet
5 to 20 Feet 5 to 20 Feet
-
BUILDING HEIGHT
PARKING: RESIDENT: 2 Covered Spaces Per Unit
30 To 35 Feet
GUEST: 64 Spaces
RV STORAGE 20 Square Feet Per Unit
STORAGE SPACE I 480 Cubic Feet Per Unit
RECREATIONAL SPACE .
A. COMMON ACTIVE I 22,000 square feet
Patio or Balcony I B. PRIVATE PASSIVE
29 to 31 Feet
2 Covered Spaces Per Unit
Including Garage Spaces &
carports.
64 Guest Spaces
20 Square Feet Per Unit
480 Cubic Feet Per Unit
40,061 square feet
Patio, Balcony, and 15' x
15' Rear Yards
e. 'The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topography of the site, and maintains and enhances significant natural resources on
the site."
The project meets all the requirements of the Hillside Development Regulations and
Guidelines, except the 30 foot slope height standard as explained in Section C(2)
of this report under Site Development Plan. The manufactured slopes would be
landscaped, and the single-family lots would terrace down the slope towards the
west to conform with the topography. The homes have roof lines that are varied
and relate to the topography. In addition, the northeastern comer of the site would
be preserved to protect the coastal sage habitat and to provide open space in the
central canyon.
CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 9
f. 'The project's circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with
the project and does not dominate the project."
See Section C(2) and E of this report under the Qualified Overlay Zone and
Subdivision Ordinance for an explanation on project circulation.
g. 'The proposed project's design and density of the developed portion of the site is
compatible with munding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood."
The proposed project meets all City standards and the proposed residential density
is consistent with the General Plan (5.8 dus/acre). The proposed residential land
uses are compatible in scale, architecture, and building materials with the multi-
family residential development to the south and future Poinsettia Community Park
to the west. Public street improvements would be provided to accommodate traffic
generated by the project and the project must comply with all the circulation and
public facility requirements of Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20. The
adjacent properties to the south have either existing multi-family residential
development or are planned for multi-family and single-family residential
development, therefore, the proposed multi-family and single-family residential
developments in this project would be compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood.
2. CHAPTER 21 253, SECTION 21 S3.120, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN - "AFFORDABLE
HOUSING" AND CHAPTER 21.06, QUALIFIED OVERLAY ZONE
The Carlsbad Municipal Code Section 21.53.120 requires a Site Development Plan for any
multi-family residential apartment development having more than 4 dwelling units or an
affordable housinn project of any size.
This project would have 349 residential units of which 47 of those units must be
designated as affordable to lower income households. The building pad in Area "A"/Lot
133 of the project does not meet the Hillside Development Ordinance's standard for slope
height (30 foot high maximum). A portion of the fill slope on the eastern edge of the
building pad for the apartments is 43 feet high which exceeds the standard by 13 feet for
approximately 100 linear feet along the slope. In order to provide affordable housing in
this project the applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission recommend to the
City Council that this standard be modified under Section 21.53.120(c) Development
Standards. A Site Development Plan for an affordable housing project may allow less
restrictive development standards than specified in the zone code or underlying zone if the
project is in conformance with the General Plan and would not have a detrimental effect
on public health, safety and welfare.
CT 92-O2/PUD 92-0WSDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 10
Before the Planning Commission recommends approval of the project to the City Council,
Title 21 of the Municipal Code under Section 21.53.120(c) requires that the following
finding be made:
"That the project is in conformity with the General Plan and adopted pcdiaes and goals of
the City, and it would have no detrimental effect on public health, safety and welfare."
See the section below entitled Oualified DeveloDment Overlav Zone (0) for additional
findings of fact that also apply to this finding requirement of the code. The creation of a
43 foot high manufactured fill slope that exceeds the 30 foot standard does not pose a
health and safety problem if the recommendations of the projects's geotechnical report are
adhered to. The slope height standard of 30 feet is an aesthetic regulation intended to
minimize visual impacts created by large manufactured slopes. The overheight slope would
not face any public roadways including Alga Road and be contour graded and adequately
landscaped to provide for visual screening, thus, offsetting any visual impacts created by
the additional 12 feet of slope height.
QUALIFIED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE (Q)/CHAPTER 21.06
The zoning for the property includes the Qualified Development Overlay Zone (Q),
therefore, before the Planning Commission recommends approval of the project to the City
Council, Title 21 , Chapter 21.06, Section 21.06.020(b) requires the Planning Commission
to make the following findings:
(1) 'That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and
environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the
geneml plan, will not be detximental to &sting uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not adversely impact the site!, surroundings or traffic circulation."
The project is consistent with the General Plan and Zone 20 Specific Plan as
explained in Sections A and B of this report. The project would not have a
significant impact on the environment as discussed in Section G of this report: The
proposed residential land uses are compatible in scale, architecture, and buiiding
materials with the multi-family residential development to the south the future
community park to the west. Public street improvements would be provided to
accommodate traffic generated by the project and the project must comply with all
the circulation and public facility requirements of Local Facilities Management Plan
Zone 20.
CT 92-O2/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 11
'That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the use."
The project complies with all City ordinances and polices except for the Hillside
Ordinance's slope height standard as explained in Section C(2) of this report,
therefore, the parcel is adequate in size, shape and slope to accommodate the
proposed land uses.
'That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features
necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the
neighbrhood will be provided and maintained."
The project would be conditioned to provide a solid wall or fence, and landscaped
windbreaks along the perimeter of any future developable area that abuts property
under "open field cultivation, in order to reduce public nuisance effects of adjacent
pesticide spraying and dust generation from farm operations.
Area "B" and '% - Single-family Residential:
a). Standard R-1 Zone front, side and rear setbacks would be provided for each
home, and all homes would have at least a two-car garages to satisfy off-
street parking requirements.
b). The front yards of all the lots would be landscaped with a minimum of 3
street trees of varying sizes, and the SO foot setback along Alga Road would
be landform graded and heavily landscaped.
Area "A" and "D" - Multi-Family Residential And Community Facility Site:
a). The bulk and scale of the proposed two-story condominiums, townhouses,
and apartment buildings would be compatible with the existing and
surrounding residential development to the south. The proposed multi-family
townhomes would provide an appropriate transition between the proposed
single-family land use to the east and the future community park land use to
the west.
b). The design of the project would assure a unique mix of residential
development, and enhance the aesthetic quality of the area as follows:
i. The street setbacks would be landscaped with a combination of trees
and shrubs to partially screen the residential structures from the
public streets.
CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 12
ii. The building elevations would have textured stucco exteriors and tile and metal roofs, varied roof lines, architectural accent features and
building forms, and varied building facades.
iii. The dwelling units would be orientated at various angles along the
driveways to provide an enclosure of space between the buildings and
to provide more visual interest when the project is viewed from the
public streets.
(4) 'That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all
traffic generated by the proposed use."
Area "B" and "C" - Single-Fdy Residential:
All the local, collector, and major streets, both within and offsite of this project
would be constructed to City standards, have underground utilities, and contain
public sidewalks. A pedestrian access is provided between Lots 47 and 48 in Area
"C" to allow access to future Hidden Valley Road and Poinsettia Community Park.
Area "A" and W' - Multi-Family Residential And Community Facility Site:
The project would provide adequate onsite parking (498 parking spaces) and
circulation to serve the needs of the residents and their guests, and it would
not impact the availability of offsite street parking.
Sidewalks and drainage facilities would be provided along the project's street
frontages to serve the project.
The proposed 30 to 45 foot wide central private driveways would be
adequate to provide safe and efficient traffic circulation, vehicle turn
movements, and emergency access. The City's Parking Ordinance requires
a minimum standard width of 24 feet for a two-way traffic aisle containing
ninety degree parking on both sides. A 24 foot driveway aisle provides
adequate separation and distance for vehicles backing out of parking spaces
and adequate separation for two-way traffic (12 feet per travel lane).
An internal pedestrian circulation system that is separated from the
driveways within the multi-family projects would be provided and allow
sufficient and safe access to the recreation facility and adjacent public streets.
Adequate access for emergency vehicles is provided by the central 30 to 45
foot wide private driveways that service the multi-family projects. The 30
to 45 foot wide driveways are also wide enough to accommodate emergency
vehicles, and the project would be conditioned to prohibit parallel parking
along the 30 foot wide driveways. The project has been reviewed and
approved by the Fire Depamnent.
9Z-O2/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-O6/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 13
3. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS/ CHAPTER 21.95
The project site contains slopes of 15% or greater and an elevation differential greater than
15 feet, therefore, a Hillside Development Pennit is required. The project design is in
conformance with the development and design standards of the Hillside Development
Regulations and the Hillside Development Guidelines, with exception to the maximum 30
foot high slope standard and the restriction on developing on slopes 40% and greater. A
43 foot high fill slope is being requested to provide a building pad large enough to
accommodate 72 apartment units, a portion of which would be designated as affordable
to lower income households (see discussion under Site Development Plan, Section C(2) of
this repon).
Grading of 40% slopes would also be necessary to construct portions of Alga Road. Areas
where circulation element roadways must be placed and no feasible alternatives consistent
with this chapter are available may be excluded from the requirements of the Hillside
Development Regulations by the decision making body based on Section 21.95.090(b)(2) I
of the ordinance. The alignment of Alga Road in this area was established with the
approval of the tentative map for Cobblestone Sea Village (CT 84-32). Analysis of
alternatives for Alga Road indicated that due to constraints from the SDG&E powerline
easement that traverses through the main canyon there is no feasible alternative consistent
with the Hillside Development Regulations.
Before the Planning Commission approves the Hillside Development Permit, Title 21,
Chapter 21.95, Section 21.95.030 requires that the Planning Commission make the
following findings:
(1) 'That hillside conditions and undevelopable areas of the project have been properly
identified."
The site's hillside slope conditions and undevelopable areas have been identified on
Constraints Exhibit 'X' dated, December 15, 1993.
(2) 'That the development proposal and all applicable development approvals and
pennits are consistent with the purpose, intent, and requirements of this chapter
and that the project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts
illustrated in the hillside development guidelines manual."
a). All manufactured cut and fill slopes are landforrqkontou graded and do not
exceed a height of 30 feet, except for the 43 foot high slope along the
eastern portion of the apartment development in Area "A" (See Site
Development Plan, Section C(2) of this report for further explanation).
CT 92-O2/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 14
The project's cut/fill grading volumes of 8,652 cubic yards per graded acre
falls within the "potentially acceptable range" of 8,000 - 10,000 cubic
yds./acre. Included in these volumes is 86,000 cubic yards of grading for
Alga Road which is a circulation element roadway. When grading for Alga
Road is subtracted out of the grading calculations, the project's grading
volumes are reduced to 7,773 cubic yards per graded acre and are within the
"acceptable range".
Landscaping in conformance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan and the City's
Landscape Manual would be provided on all manufactured slopes to assist in
visually screening the slopes and to reduce erosion.
AU structures and roofs within the project would be earth tone in color to
reduce visual impacts.
A percentage of the homes along the northhouth trending and gently sloping
ridgeline would be one-story in height and all homes would have varying
roof lines.
The multi-family residential buildings are setback from the top of
manufactured slopes from a range of 15 to 60 feet, along the eastern portion
of Area ItA".
(3)
(4)
4.
'That no development or grading will occur in those portions of the property which
are undevelopable pursuant to the provkions of Section 21.53.230 of this code."
All undevelopable areas have been identified and except for Alga Road no
development or grading would occur in the areas containing 40%+ slopes.
'That the project design and lot configutation mhhizes disturbance of hillside
lands."
The proposed grading would create single-family building pads that are terraced for
views and step down the slope. A majority of the local streets and manufaciured
slopes are Curving and are aligned to follow the north/south trending contours. The
street alignments and curving landform graded slopes would reduce visual impacts
created by the grading and help simulate the natural slope conditions.
INCLUSIONARY HOUSXNG ORDINANCE, CHAPTER 21.85:
The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance implements the hclusionary objectives of the Housing
Element (Objective 3.6), and at a minimum, the project would be required to provide not
less than 15% of all proposed residential units affordable to lower income households. The
92-O2/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 15
General Plan pennits 312 dwelling units on this site, therefore, 15% of those units would
yield a minimum requirement to provide 47 housing units affordable to lower income
households, (Note: the applicant has requested a density bonus, therefore, 20% of the 312
base units dwelling units or 63 units must be affordable). The applicant is proposing to
meet the affordable housing requirement of the project within the apartment portion of the
site plan (Area "A"/Lot 133). In addition, at least five (10% min.) of the affordable
apartment units must be three-bedroom. The applicant is proposing three-bedroom units
that contain 1,017 square feet to accommodate larger families.
The project would be conditioned to require an Affordable Housing Agreement that would
be submitted for review and approval by the City prior to Final Map approval. The
Affordable Housing Agreement is a legally binding agreement between the applicant and
the City which provides the specific details regarding the implementation of the affordable
housing requirements of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and subsequent conformance with the
City's Housing Element.
5.
The applicant is requesting an 11.8 percent density bonus above the maximum General
Plan land use designation for the site (RLM/RM), under the provisions of the City's
Residential Density Bonus Ordinance. The purpose of this ordinance is to provide
incentives to developers for the production of housing affordable to lower income
households. Density bonus means a minimum density increase of at least 25% over the
growth management dwelling unit allowance for the project site. Section 21.86.030 of the
ordinance states that for new residential construction the City &alJ grant a density bonus
and at least one additional incentive. Additional incentives may consist of a reduction in
development standards and architectural design requirements, partial or additional densiw
and direct financial aid. Under the provisions for a density bonus the applicant must agree
to construct a minimum of 20% (more restrictive than 15% inclusionary requirement) of
the total base units of the project as restricted and affordable to low income households,
or a minimum of 10% of the total base units as restricted and affordable to very low
income households. The project would have 72 apartment Units in Area "A" and the
applicant shall meet these minimum density bonus requirements by providing 63 apartment units affordable to lower income households.
DENSJTY BONUS ORDNANCE, c"ER 21.86:
CT 92-O2/PUD 92-0WSDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15,1993
CITY ADMINISTRATION
LIBRARY
WASTE WATER TREATMENT
PAGE 16
1,213.36 sq. ft. Yes
647.1 sq. ft. Yes
353 EDU Yes
D. GROWTHMANAGEMENT
~~
PARKS
DRAINAGE
The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20 in the
Southwest Quadrant. The impacts on public facilities c,reated by this project and
compliance with the adopted performance standards are summarized as follows:
~~
2.42 Acres Yes
N/A Yes
II I I COMPLrANCEwITH
CIRCULATION
FIRE
II FACILITY I Ih4PACI-S 1 STANDARDS
~~ ~
3650 ADT Yes
Station # 4 Yes
CUSD
~~~
Yes
WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 77,660 GPD
11 OPEN SPACE I 9.03 Acres I Yes
Yes
11 SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM I 353 EDU I Yes
This project will be served by public facilities which are adequate to meet the
increased demand generated by the increased density. In general, public facilities
have been sized to accommodate the maximum development allowed under the
General Plan and Proposition E for the Southwest Quadrant. The density increase
CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 17
requested for this project simply shifts density from one portion of the quadrant to
another and does not create an overall increase in demand beyond the projections
contained in the Citywide Facilities and Improvements Plan. Therefore, sufficient
facilities are either already in place or will be provided concurrent with the project
to ensure that the adequacy of the City's public facility plans will not be adversely
impacted.
(2) 'There have been sufficient develo~ments approved in the auadrant at densities
below the conml mint to cover the units in the ~miect above the control mint - so
that apmoval will not result in exceedinn the auadrant limit."
The Aviara Master Plan has been approved for development of approximately 572
dwelling units less than what was projected in the adopted Zone 19 LFMP. These
units are referred to as "excess" units, and they may be utilized to grant density
increases elsewhere in the Southwest Quadrant, subject to City Council Policy No.
43. Approval of this project will make use of 36.83 units, leaving a balance of approximately 535.17 units that would be available for density increases to other
future projects. Monitoring of the balance of excess units and density increases will
assure that the quadrant limits stated in Proposition E are never exceeded.
(3) "All necessary I) ublic facilities d bv this chapter will be constructed or are guaranteed to he constructed concumntly with the need for them created by this
develoDment and in compliance with the adopted City standards."
As stated in finding #1, all public facilities necessary to serve this project are either
already in place or will be provided by conditions of approval placed on the project.
As shown in the table above, all facilities will remain in compliance with adopted
City standards.
E. SUBDMSION ORDIT+JANcE/TITLE 2Q
The proposed tentative map would comply with all the requirements of the City's
Subdivision Ordinance, Title 20. Currently there are no public roads to serve the project
site, therefore, the developer must extend public street improvements off the project site
to connect to the existing circulation network. In addition, in order to comply with the
City cul-de-sac policy the developer is required to construct a second offsite road
connection for emergency access purposes. To satisfy this secondary access requirement,
the developer is proposing to extend Hidden Valley Road north from the project site to
Palomar Airport Road. The developer is also proposing to extend Alga Road from the
project site south to the current teIminus of Alga Road at its intersection with Poinsettia
Lane.
CT 92-O2/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
SAMBI
DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 18
The construction of these two access roads together with the onsite roads shown on the
proposed vesting tentative map would be adequate to serve the proposed project. In addition, new traffic signals would be necessary at the intersections of Hidden Valley
Road/Palomar Airport Road, Alga/Poinsettia Lane, and Alga Road/Cherry Blossom Road.
With the construction of the roads and traffic signals, the proposed project would comply
with the established standards of the Growth Management Ordinance.
The project site naturally drains into two separate sewer basins. The portion of the project
wesr of Alga Road drains west towards Hidden Valley Road where it would be collected
in a main line and carried north down Hidden Valley Road to the main trunk line adjacent
to Palomar Airport Road. The portion of project east of Alga Road naturally drains north
to Cherry Blossom Road and ultimately flows in a main line down the canyon which runs
parallel with Alga Road and connects to the same trunk line adjacent to Palomar Airport
Road. On an interim basis, the developer is proposing to construct a sewer lift station
adjacent to Cheny Blossom Road and pump the sewer across Alga Road to the sewer main
in Hidden Valley Road. The developer is required to contribute a fair share contribution
towards the construction of the future main line in the Alga Road canyon through payment
of the sewer benefit area fee established for this sewer drainage basin.
To mitigate drainage impacts from the project site the developer is required to provide
adequate drainage, erosion control, and urban pollutant basins. To comply with Water
Quality standards, City grading and erosion control requirements, and the requirements of
the Mello 11 segment of the Local Coastal Program, the developer is required to install
permanent and or temporary siltatiodretention basins at the downstream end of all
proposed storm drain pipes.
F. MEUO ll SEGMENT OF LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM
The project is located in the Mello I1 Segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP) and
complies with the plan as follows:
(1) The project is located within the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone. The
construction of Hidden Valley Road offsite would impact disturbed riparian habitat
and 25%+ slopes containing coastal sage scrub habitat located in a small drainage
that flows to the north and along Encinas Creek which flows east to west. This
road is required to provide access and sewer facilities to this northwestern portion
of the Zone 20 Specific Plan and there are no alternatives to the road alignment
that would be more environmentally sensitive. To offset the biological impacts
created by Hidden Valley Road a mitigation program has been provided. In
addition, portions of onsite Alga Road, Cherry Blossom Road and Carnino de las Ondas would impact 25%+ slopes containing coastal sage scrub habitat. These
roadway links are necessary to provide access to developable areas while at the
same time comply with City engineering standards and policies for major, collector,
and local roadways.
92-O2/PUD 92-WSDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
sAMB[ DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 19
The Overlay Zone permits development and grading on slopes over 25% with native
coastal habitat when it is a circulation element roadway (Alga Road), a utility
system (sewer lines, drainage basins, etc.), and in order to provide access to
developable areas of the project site if there is no less environmentally damaging
alternative. In all cases biological mitigation is proposed to offset any impacts to
coastal sage habitat. The project has been conditioned such that prior to approval
of a final map, all applicable state and federal resource agencies must be consulted,
applicable permits must be obtained, and a final biological mitigation program must
be approved.
The project would also be conditioned to provide adequate drainage, siltation, and
erosion control facilities as part of the approved grading permit. The grading
operation would be limited to the summer construction season, April 1 to October
1.
The project contains vacant non-prime agrkdtural land containing Class 111 and lV
soils and is located in the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone (Site 11). The Mello I1
LCP requires mitigation when non-prime coastal agricultural land is converted to
urban land uses. The project would be conditioned to comply with one of the three
LCP mitigation options provided when projects are located in Site 11: (1) "Prime
Land Exchange"; (2) "Determination of Agricultural Feasibility"; and (3)
"Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee".
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW/ TtTLE 19 AND CEOA
The project site is located within the boundaries of the Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203)
which covers the 640 acre Zone 20 planning area. The direct, indirect, and cumulative
environmental impacts from the future development of the Zone 20 planning area have
been discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR 90-03) for the specific plan.
The recommended and applicable mitigation measures of Final EIR 90-03 would be
included as conditions of approval for this project. Per the requirements of Final EIR 90-03
additional project specific environmental studies, including biological analysis, have been
prepared. These studies provide more focused and detailed project level analysis and
indicate that additional environmental impacts beyond what was analyzed in Final EIR 90-
03 would result from implementation of the project.
Per the recommendations of Final EIR 90-03 a Conditional Negative Declaration was issued
for this project to evaluate the additional environmental impacts to coastal sage scrub and riparian habitats created by onsite development and the alignment of Hidden Valley Road
north to Palomar Airport Road. The Planning Director has determined that the project
could have a significant effect on the environment, however, there would not be a
significant effect in this case since the mitigation measures described in the attached initial
study have been added to the project. This decision was based on findings of the
Environmental Assessment Part 11, Biological Resource Impact Studies, a Geotechnical
Report, acoustical study, traffic report, and a field surveys by staff. A Conditional Negative
Declaration was issued by the Planning Director on August 5, 1993.
CT 92-OZ/PUD 92-03/S~P 92-06/HDP 92-03 , SAMBI
DECEMBER 15, 1993
PAGE 20
The Conditional Negative Declaration was sent to the State Clearinghouse for State Public
Agency review, and one letter from the Department of Fish and Game was received. It was
also sent to the United State Fish and Wildlife Senrice'and the Army Corps of Engineers
for review and no comments were received. The Department of Fish and Game has indicated that the project would create impacts to sensitive coastal sage scrub and riparian
habitat and they have requested consultation, therefore, the project has been conditioned
such that prior to approval of a final map, all applicable state and federal resource agencies
must be consulted, applicable permits must be obtained, and a final biological mitigation
program must be approved.
IV. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposed project: (1) is consistent with the general plan; (2) complies with the Zone
20 Specific Plan; (3) meets the requirements of Title 20 and 21; (4) findings for the Site
Development Plan can be made under Section 21.06.020 and 21.53.120; (5) is consistent
with the Mello I1 Local Coastal Program; (6) complies with Growth Management; and (7)
is in conformance with the mitigation requirements of Final EIR 90-03, and will not
significantly impact the environment, therefore, staff recommends approval of CT 92-
02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3590
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3591
3. Planning Cornmission Resolution No. 3592
4. Planning Cornmission Resolution No. 3593
5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3594
6. Location Map
7. Background Data Sheet
8. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form
9. Disclosure Form
10. Reduced Exhibits
11. Full size Exhibits "A" - YYY', dated December 15, 1993
JG:lh
November 26. 1993
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
E
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
1E
15
2c
21
22
2:
24
25
2E
27
2€
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3590
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE cIm OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR AVESTING TENTATIVE MAP, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AND HILLSIDE
LOTS, 76 TOWNHOMES, 72 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, 72
APARTMENT UNITS, AND ,TWO FUTURE COMMUNITY
FACILITY SITES, ALL ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE, NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS
ONDAS, SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD IN LOCAL
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: SAMBI
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEVELOP 129 SINGLE-FAMILY
CASE NO: CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did on the 15th day of December, 1993,
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request, and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, examining the initial study, analyzing the information submitted by staff,
and considering any written comments received, the Planning Commission considered all
factors relating to the Conditional Negative Declaration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Planning
Commission hereby RECOMMENDS APPROVAL of the conditional Negative
Declaration according to Exhibit "CND", dated August 5, 1993, and "PII",
dated July 15, 1993, attached hereto and made a part hereof, based on the
following findings:
Findinns:
1. The initial study shows that the proposed project could have a significant impact on
the environment, however, there will be no sigruficant impact in this case because
the mitigation measures described in the initial study have been added to the
project.
1
2
3
4
5
E
7
E
S
1c
13
If
1:
14
1I
It
15
1E
1:
2(
21
2:
21
24
2:
26
2';
21
2. The streets are adequate in size to handle traffic generated by the proposed project.
3. The project is in compliance with the adopted mitigation measures of Find
Environmental Impact Report 90-03 and would not create any additional significant
environmental impacts based on the conditions of this Conditional Negative
Declaration.
Conditions:
1.
2.
Approval of this project, is subject to all conditions contahed in Planning
Commission Resolution No.'s 3591, 3592, 3593, and 3594.
The applicant shall provide the following noise mitigation measures to comply with
Planning Department Policy No. 17:
a.
b.
C.
d.
Prior to occupancy of individual units, the applicant shall construct
sound attenuation walls, berms, or a combination of both along Alga
Road per the requirements of the project's noise study dated
September, 1992 and any subsequent amendments. If sound
attenuation walls are provided along Alga Road, the walls shall be
designed with pilasters, be compatible with the proposed
development, offset with tree wells, and landscaped to provide
screening of the walls fiom the roadway in order to reduce visual
impacts along the street. All secondary story balconies along Alga
Road shall be sound attenuated to 60 CNEL.
To obtain an interior noise level of 45 CNEL, the windows and doors
in buildings subject to traffic noise must be closed, therefore, a
"windows closed" condition is applicable and a mechanical ventilation
system with fresh air provisions in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code and Planning Department Policy No. 17 is required.
Prior to the issuance of building permits the owner of the record of
the property shall prepare and record a notice that this property is
subject to noise impacts fiom the existing Alga Road transportation
corridor and overflight, sight, and sound of aircraft operating.from
Palomar Airport. The notice shall be prepared in a manner meeting
the approval of the Planning Director and the City Attorney.
The applicant shall post aircraft noise notification signs in all sales
and/or rental offices associated with the new development. The
number and locations of said signs shall be approved by the Planning
Director (see Noise, Form #3 on file in the Ph.nn.hg Department).
PC RES0 NO 3590 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
€
S
1c
11
12
12
14
1:
1E
l‘i
1€
1s
2C
21
2:
2:
24
2t
2E
27
2E
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
....
....
The applicant shall comply with the City’s requirements of the National Pollutazr
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the
City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building permit, whichever occurs first.
Prior to approval of a final map, issuance of a grading permit, or approval of
improvement plans for Hidden Valley Road from the Poinsettia Park north to
Palomar Airport Road, whichever occurs first, a detailed biological mitigation,
restoration and enhancement plan to mitigate project and Hidden Valley Road
biological hpacts, per the recommendations of Final EIR 90-03 and the Biological
Technical Report of the Sambi Project, dated July 1993, shall be prepared and
approved by the City. In addition, and pursuant to Section 1601/1603 of the Fish
and Game Code, the applicant shall obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement from
the California Fish and Game Department if required for any proposed alterations
to existing natural watercourses and shall comply with any and all permit
requirements associated therewith. The applicant, in conjunction with the
Department of the Army Corp of Engineers shall determine whether a 404 permit
shall be required for alterations to wetland areas. The applicant, in conjunction
with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service shall determine ifa 10A permit or
other restrictions of the NCCP and Endangered Species Act process is required for
impacts to coastal sage scrub habitat. If applicable, the applicant shall obtain said
permits and comply with those conditions and requirements imposed therewith.
Prior to approval of a final map, issuance of a grading permit, or approval of
improvement plans for Hidden Valley Road from Poinsettia Park north to Palomar
Airport Road, the applicant, in discussion with the Planning and Engineering
Departments, shall consider, if feasible, the incorporation of an oversized culvert
under Hidden Valley Road at the Encinas Creek crossing to mitigate the effects of
fragmentation of the open space and wildlife conidor caused by the roadway, and
to enhance wildlife mobility in the area.
The applicant shall comply with all mitigation requirements of the Preliminary
Geotechnical Investigation for the project prepared by Pacific Soils Engineering, [nc.,
dated February 1989 and any subsequent revisions to the report, prior to issuance
of a grading permit.
In addition to the conditions above, the project shall comply with all the applicable
mitigation conditions of Final EIR 90-03 for the Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203), as
contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 3525, dated June 16, 1993.
PC RES0 NO 3590 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of December, 1993,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
BAILEY NOBLE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO 3590 4
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
~~: Clearinghouse, 1600 Tenth Street, Rm. 121, Sacremento, CA 95814 - 916/445-0613
See NOTE Betar:
Projut Title: Sanbi - CT PZ-OZ/HOP 92-03/wO 92-03/SOP 92-04
Lead Agecry: City of Cartsbad Contact Person: Jeff Gibson
City: Carlsbad Zip: 92009 Cocnty: San Dieso
PROJECT LOCATIOY:
County: San Dieso City/Nearest Camnnity: Carlsbed
Cross Streets: Camino de Las Ondas/Paseo del Norte Total Acres: 68.6
Assessor's Parcel No. 216-14-07 Section: TW. Range: Base:
Uithin 2 Wiles: State Huy #: 1-5 Uaterways: Batiquitos Lagoon
Street Address: 2075 Las Palms Drive Phm: (619)~3a-i161. ext. 4455
____.____.________._-.---.---.-..------.-------------------------.--.---------.-------------..-----.--------.---.----.-.-------
Airprts: McClellcn - PelaMr Railways: ATLSF Schools: --------.----__-_-______________________--------------------.---------------------------------..---------.---------------.-------
WCUEYT TYPE
Joint OOcunent - Final Docwnt
EM: - NOP - Supplement/Subscqucnt YEPA: - NO1 OTHER: - EA
FONS I
- Early Cons - EIR (Prior SCH No.) -
- Draft EIR - X Neg Oec - Other - Draft €IS - Other - ---__-___.______---_-------------------------------..-------------------------------..------------------------------------.---..
Lax ACTlW TYPE
- General Plan Update - General Plan Ammdnent - General Plan ELemnt - Cmity Plan
---
Specific Plan - - Master Plan - X Planned Unit Developnnt - Site Plan
DMLBWEYT TYPE
- X Residential: Units 352 Acres 68.6
- Comnrcial: Sq. Ft. Acres Enployees - Industrial: Sq. Ft. Acres Emp 1 oyees - Educa t i one l - Retreat i OML
- Off ice: Sq. Ft. Acres EqJl oyees - Water Facilities: - Transportatim: - Mining: - Power: - Uaste Treatment: - Hazardous Waste:
X
X - - Aesthet i c/Vi sua 1 . - Flood Plain/Flooding - School smivers i ties - X Water Quality Agricultural Land - Forest LWFire Hazard - septic Wtem - Uater Srpply/ Air Quality - X Ccologic/Seismic - Sewer Capcity Grovd Uater Archaeological/Historical - ninerals X Soil Erorion/Carprction/Grading J- Wetlad/Riparian Coastal Zone - X Noise .- Solid Uaste - X Wildlife Drainage/Absorption - Popllation/Houring Balance - Toxic/Hatardous - Growth Inducing Econuni c/ Job - Prrblfc Services/Facilities - Traffic/Circulation - Lantj~~e Fiscal - Retreat 1 on/Parks - X Vegetation - Cuhllative Effect - Othqr -----___________.----------------------------------.-------------------------------------------------.-..-------------.---------
Prerat Lad Usefloning/Gaanl Plm UI. Vacant/RDM-Q;R-l-lO-O/RM;RUI
WE: Clearinghouse will assign identification nuhers for all m projects.
frcia a Notice of Preparation or previous draft docrmant) please fill it in.
If a SCH rxakr atreedy exists for a project (e.g. Revised October 1989
CONDITIONAL NEGATlVE DECLARATION
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: South of Pdomar Airport Road, east of Paseo del Norte,
north of C~o de las Ondas.
APN: 214-14-07
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Development of a 68.6 acre parcel to include 222 multi-family
residential dwelling units - 150 townhomes and 72 apartinents,
130 single-family lots, and 625,000 cubic yards of grading to
accommodate building pads, lots, recreation areas, utilities,
private driveways, local public streets, two non-loaded collector
streets, and a circulation element roadway (Alga Road). '
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described project
pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act
and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Conditional Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project.
Justification for this action is on file in the Phnn.hg Department.
A copy of the Conditional Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on file in the
Planning Department, 2075 Las Palmas Drive, Carlsbad, California 92009. Comments from
the public are invited. Please submit comments in Writing to the Planning Department
within 30 days of date of issuance. If you have any questions, please call Jeff Gibson in
the Planning Department at (619) 438-1161, extension 4455.
DATED:
CASE NO:
CASE NAME:
PUBLISH DATE:
AUGUST 5,1993
MICHAEL J. HIXZMK~ER
CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/
HDP 92-03 .
Planning Director
SAMBI
AUGUST 5,1993
2075 Las Palmas Drive * Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 (619) 438-1 161 @
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM - PART II
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
CASE NO. CT 92-02/HDP 92-03/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06
DATE: JULY 15. 1993
BACKGROUND
1. CASE NAME: SAMBI
2. APPLICANT: TOYOHAM AMERICA INC. C/O MR DON AGATEP
3. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: 2956 ROOSEVELT
CARLSBAD. CA 92008
(619) 434-1056
4. DATE EM FORM PART I SUBMIITED: FEBRUARY 14.1992
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Development of a 68.6 acre Darcel to include 222 multi-family
residential dwelling units - 150 townhomes and 72 aDartments . 130 sinnle-family lots, and
625.000 cubic yards of grading to accommodate building Dads. lots. recreation areas. utilities,
private driveways. local Dublic streets. two non-loaded collector streets. and a circulation
element roadway (Alga Road).
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, Chapter 3, Article 5, section 15063 requires that the City conduct an
Environmental Impact Assessment to determine if a project may have a significant effect on the environment.
The Environmental Impact Assessment appears in the following pages in the form of a checklist. This
checklist 8 identifies any physical, biological and human factors that might be impacted by the proposed
project and provides the City with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an
Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration.
* A Negative Declaration may be prepared if the City perceives no substantial evidence that the project or
any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment. On the checklist, "NO" will be checked
to indicate this determination.
* An EIR must be prepared if the City determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the
project may cause a sidcant effect on the environment. The project may qualify for a Negative
Declaration however, if adverse impacts are mitigated so that environmental effects can be deemed
insignificant. These findings are shown in the checklist under the headings "YES-sig" and '"YES-insig"
respectively.
A discussion of potential impacts and the proposed mitigation measures appears at the end of the form under
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. Particular attention should be given to discussing
mitigation for impacts which would othde be determined significant.
PHYSICAL ENVIR0"T
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIREaY OR INDIRECTLY YES
(si@
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
a.
9.
10.
11.
Result in unstable earth conditions or
increase the exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards?
Appreciably change the topography or any
unique physical features?
Result in or be affected by erosion of soils
either on or off the site?
Result in changes in the deposition of beach
sands, or modification of the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake?
Result in substantial adverse effects on
ambient air quality?
Result in substantial changes in air
movement, odor, moisture, or temperature?
Substantially change the course or flow of
water (marine, fresh or flood waters)?
Affect the quantity or quality of surface
water, ground water or public water supply?
Substantially increase usage or cause
depletion of any natural resources?
Use substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Alter a significant archeological,
paleontological or historical site,
structure or object?
YES NO
(insig)
-2-
I
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
WLL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
Introduce new species of plants into an area,
or a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
Reduce the amount of acreage of any
agricultural crop ox affect prime, unique
or other farmland of state or local
importance?
Affect the diversity of species, habitat
or numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals, all water dwelling organisms
and insects?
Introduce new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the
migration or movement of animals?
YES YES
(sig) (insig)
NO
"ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY YES YES NO
(si@ (insig)
17. Alter the present or planned land use
of an area?
18. Substantially affect public utilities,
schools, police, fire, emergency or other
public services?
X
X -
-3-
"ENVIRONMENT
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY YES YES
big) (insig)
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Result in the need for new or modified sewer
systems, solid waste or hazardous waste
control systems?
Increase existing noise levels?
Produce new light or glare?
Involve a significant risk of an explosion
or the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
Substantially alter the density of the
human population of an area? .
Affect existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
Generate substantial additional traffic?
Affect existing parking facilities, or
create a large demand for new parking?
Impact existing transportation systems or
alter present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods?
Alter waterborne, rail or air traffic?
Increase traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans?
Obstruct any scenic vista or create an
aesthetically offensive public view?
Mect the quality or quantity of
existing recreational opportunities?
- X
- X
NO
X -
X -
X -
X -
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
WILL THE PROPOSAL DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY:
33. Does the project have the potential
to substantially degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wild-
life species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to efiminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or en-
dangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory.
34. Does the project have the potential
to achieve short-term, to the dis-
advantage of long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a
relatively brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the hture.)
35. Does the project have the possible
environmental effects which are in-
dividually limited but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively con-
siderable" means that the incremental
effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable hture projects.)
36. Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
YES YES
(sig) (insig)
NO
X -
-5-
DISCUSSION OF EPJVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION
PROJECT BACKGROUND AND ENVcR0"TAL SETI'KNG:
The project is located south of Rihrnar Airport Road, east of Paseo Del Norte, adjacent to future Hidden
Valley Road, and north of Camin0 De Las Ondas in the City of Carlsbad. The western two-thirds of the
property is almost entirely utilized for active agricdturd use. The property contains gently sloping
topography that rises from west to east towards a ridgeline. At the northwestern comer of the property is the edge of a highly disturbed finger canyon which continues north and eventually connects with Canyon de las Encinas. Along the eastern edge of the property is a larger nowsouth canyon system.
Elevation ranges hm 156 to 300 feet above mean sea level. Soil types include Las Flores loamy fine
sand, Gaviota fine sandy loam, and Chesterson fine sandy loam. Three vegetation types are present on
the property: ruderal/agriculture, Diegan coastal sage scrub in varying levels of disturbance, and
disturbed riparian scrub.
Vehicular access to the site would be provided from Camino de las Ondas, future Alga Road from Poinsettia Lane, and a future collector street named Hidden Valley Road. Hidden Valley Road would
travel along the site's western property line, intersect with Camino de las Ondas to the south and
intersect with Palomar Airport Road to the north. The project would sewer north along Hidden Valley
and connect with the east/west trunk line in Canyon de las Encinas.
The project site is located within the boundaries of Specific Plan 203 which covers the 640 acre Zone
20 Planning Area. The Final EIR 90-03 for SP 203 addresses the potential environmental impacts
associated with the future buildout of the Zone 20 Specific Plan area. Use of the program EIR enables the City to characterize the overall environmental impacts of the specific plan. The Final EIR contains broad, general environmental analysis that serves as an information base to be consulted when ultimately
approving subsequent development projects (Le. tentative maps, site development plans, grading permits,
etc ...) within the specific plan. The City can avoid having to "reinvent the wheel" with each subsequent
development project by analyzing, in the program EIR, the regional influences, secondary effects,
cumulative impacts, and broad alternatives associated with buildout of the planning area. The
recommended mitigation measures of Final EIR 90-03 will be included as conditions of approval for this
project. This subsequent expanded "Initial Study" is intended to supplement the Final EIR and provide
more focused and detailed project level analysis of site specific environmental impacts and provide more
refined project level mitigation measures as required by Final EIR 90-03. As an example, additional environmental impacts not addressed in EIR 90-03 include riparian impacts created by the alignment of
Hidden Valley Road north to Palomar Airport Road and site specific traffic noise impacts.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT:
Development of the site would include 625,000 cubic yards of grading to accommodate building pads, lots, recreation areas, utilities, private driveways, local public streets, two non-loaded collector streets
and a circulation element roadway (Alga Road). The proposed grading and development of the project
would conform to the Citfs Hillside Development Ordinance and manufactured slopes would be
landfowcontour graded, landscaped, and not exceed 30 feet in height, therefore the alteration of the
topography would not be considered a significant physical impact. The Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation prepared by Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc., dated February 6,1989 states that; "the subject
property is compatible with the indicated geotechnical conditions and may'be developed with
conventional cut and fill grading techniques; Considering the dense to medium dense character of the Lindavista Formation and Scripps Formation, liquefaction potential is considered nii". Erosion control
-6-
meaSuTeS including landscaping on manufactured slopes, adequate drainage facilities, and proper sod compac~on would all be conditions of approval for the project and be required by the Engineering
Depment prior to issuance of the grading permit.
Development of the project w0uld create impervious surfaces onsite which reduce absorption rates and
increases surface runoff and runoff velocities, however, the appropriate drainage facilities would be
provided. Drainage from roofs, streets, driveways, slopes, and yards in the project would constitute a
potentially signrficant impact to water quality due to urban pollutant runoff, therefore, mitigation
measures will be required to reduce to an insignificant level the amount of contaminants contained in
the moff. Temporary desiltation basins would be provided within the project in graded pad areas and
a permanent basin is proposed west of future Hidden Valley Road, adjacent to Encinas Creek at the 67
foot elevation. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant must comply with the requirements
of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant would be required to provide the best management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level
prior to discharge to sensitive biological areas. Compliance with this requirement would reduce any
water quality impacts to below a level of significance.
For a discussion on air quality see Section 3.3 of Final EIR 90-03 for the Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203).
Final EIR 90-03 identified one archaeological site (Sdi-9478) and no historic sites Within the project
boundaries. Sdi-9478 is classified in EIR 90-03 as a site that was identified as potentially significant and
will require preliminary significance evaluation prior to approval of a tentative map. The Preliminary
Archaeological Analysis For Sdi-9478, prepared by Advanced Sciences, Inc., dated July 10, 1992,
indicates that the site can not be located for testing due to dense, high grass cover, and recent extensive
agricultural activity in the area. Due to the extremely disturbed nature of the area it was determined that the site is no longer extent, therefore, Site CA-Sdi-9478 has been determined not significant based
on criteria presented in Appendix K of CEQA and no further recommendations for cultural resources
impact mitigation are offered.
BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT:
The Biology Section of Final EIR 90-03 provides baseline data at a gross scale due to the large size of
the planning area. Given the large number of property owners and their differing development horizons
and the inevitable change in biological conditions over the long term buildout of the planning area, it
is not possible to mitigate biological impacts from the buildout of the entire specific plan under one
comprehensive open space easement that crosses property lines or a habitat revegetatiodenhancement
plan sponsored solely by the property owners. Based on the future biological impacts created by individual subsequent development projects, property owners within the planning area will be given
several mitigation options that will be based on subsequent and additional site specific bioldgical survey
and impact analysis. These additional biological studies will consider the baseline data and biological
open space recommendations of Final EIR 90-03 and provide more detailed resource surveys plotted at
the tentative map scale for each property. The range of the future mitigation options would include
preservation of sensitive habitat onsite in conjunction with enhancement/revegetation plans, payment
of fees into a regional conservation plan, or the purchase and protection of similar habitat offsite.
A Biological Technical Report was prepared for the project by Anita Hayworth, Biological Consultant,
dated July 1993. This subsequent biological study is intended to supplement the Final EIR, provide more
focused and detailed project level analysis of site specific biological impacts and provide more refined
project level mitigation measures as required by Final EIR 90-03. The report indicates that
-7-
implementation of the project would create significant impacts to coastal sage scrub and riparian habitats,
therefore, mitigation measures designed to reduce biological impacts to below a level of significance will be required as part of this environmental document, (see attached conditions). The project site was
surveyed for sensitive plant and animal species and no species were observed during the sensitive species survey, including the burrowing owl survey, therefore, sipficant impacts would not occur to sensitive
species. Mitigation proposed in the biology report includes onsite habitat preservation, onsite efimcement/revegetation of habitat, and the option for offsite enhancement/revegetation, purchase and
protection of inkind offsite habitat, or the possible payment of fees for a regional conservation plan. The
detailed mitigation plans would be finalized prior to approval of a final map for the project and subject
to review and approval by State and Federal resource agencies.
The site is currently being utilized for agricultural purposes. It does not contain prime agricultural SO&, however, it is located in the Coastal Agricultural Overlay Zone (Site It) and the Mello It Local Coastal
Program requires mitigation when non-prime coastal agricultural land is converted to urban uses,
therefore, compliance with the adopted LCP mitigation would reduce all adverse impacts to an
insignificant level.
"ENVIRONMENT:
The project would not alter the planned land use of the site and is consistent with the residential land
use designation and density established by the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan.
Portions of the site had been farmed and cultivated for a number of years and there may be a potential
for significant impacts to future residents from accumulations of hazardous chemicals in the soil. Based
on the Soil Testing for Pesticide Residue Report for Sambi prepared by Pacific Soils Environmental, dated July 1992, analytical tests on soil sampled did not detect pesticideherbicide residue. The report states
that; "further environmental sampling for pesticide residue in soil appears unwarranted for this property,
based on the information available at this time".
The project would increase t~affic in the area, however, a Traffic Impact Analysis conducted as part of
the Zone 20 Specific Plan and the project indicates that compliance with the circulation requirements of
the Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203), Final EIR 90-03, and the Local Facilities Management Plan for Zone
20 would mitigate any significant traffic impacts.
The project is located within the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan. Public facility impacts and financing have been accounted for in this plan to accommodate the residential development. The
residential land use would be consistent with the General Plan, therefore, the project would not significantly impact public facilities and planned land uses.
Traffic noise from future Alga Road would create a significant impact on homes adjacent to the road,
therefore, a noise study was prepared for the project by Robert Ka€m, John Kain Associates, tnc., dated
February 1992. Noise levels on the project site will not exceed the exterior noise standard of 60 CNEL and the interior noise standard of 45 CNEL, if the recommended mitigation measures recommended in
this study are implemented. Sound attenuation walls, berms, or a combination of both would be required along Alga Road to mitigate exterior traffic noise to comply with Phmhg Department Policy No. 17.
If sound attenuation walls are provided along Alga Road, special landscaping and wall design criteria
shall be required to reduce any potential visual impacts the walls may create along the roadway.
-8-
ways~s OF VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJEm SUCH AS:
a) Phased development of the project,
b) alternate site designs,
C) alternate scale of development,
d) altemate uses for the site, e) development at some future time rather than now,
f) alternate sites for the proposed project, and
g) no project alternative.
For a discussion on alternatives to the proposed project see Section 8.0 in Final EIR 90-03 for the
Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203).
-9-
On'the basis of this initial evaluation:
1 find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, because
the environmental effects of the proposed project have already been considered in conjunction
with previously certified environmental documents and no additional environmental review is
required. Therefore, a Notice of Determination has been prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there
will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached
sheet have been added to the project. A Conditional Negative Declaration will be proposed.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
3kL 1933 ' Date
?
Date Planning Director -
LIST MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE]
1. The applicant shall provide the following noise mitigation measures to comply with Planning
Department Policy No. 17:
a. Prior to occqmcy of individual units, the appliczmt shall co~lst~ct sound
attenuation walls, benms, or a combination of both along Alga Road per the
requirementS of the project's noise study dated February, 1992. If d attenuation walls are prwided along Alga Road, the walls shall be designed.
with pilasters, be comptiile with the proposed development, offset with tree-
wells, and hdscqed to provide saeenhg of the walls hm the roadway in
order to reduce visual impacts along the street.
b. To obtain an interior noise level of 45 CNEL, the windows and doors in
buildings subject to traffic noise must be closed, therefore, a"windows closed"
condition is applicable and a mechanid veurilation system with fresh air provisionS in accordazlce with the Uniform Bddi~g Code and PlaMing
Department Policy No. 17 is requkd.
-10-
c. Prior to the issuance of building permits the owner of the record of the property
shall prepare and record a notice that this property is subject to noise impacts
from the existing Alga Road transportation corridor and overflight, sight, and
sound of airnaft operating hm Palomar Airport. The notice shall be prepared
in a manner meeting the approval of the Planning Director and the City
Attorney.
d. The applicant shall post airaaft noise notification Signs in all sales and/or rental
offices assodated with the new development. The number and locations of said
signs shall he approved by the Planning Director (see Noise, Form #3 on file
in the Planning Department).
2. The applicant shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elirdnation System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best management practices to
reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such
improvements shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading or building
pennit, whichever occm first.
3. Prior to approval of a final map, issuance of a gtading pennit, or approval of impmvanm plans
for Hidden Valley Road hm the Poinsettia Park south to Palomar Airport Road, whichever occurs firsz a detailed biological mitigation, restoration and enhancement plan to mitigate project and
Hidden Valley Road biological impacts, per the recommendations of Final EIR 9043 and the
Biologicid Technical Report of the Sambi Project, dated July 1993, shall be prepared and approved
by the City. Ln addition, and pursuant to Section 1601/1603 of the Fish and Game Code, the
applicant shall obtain a Streambed Altemtion Agmment fiom the California Fish and Game
Department if required for any proposed alterations to existing ~tural WatercouTSes and shall
comply with any and all permit requirements associated therewith. The applicant, in conjunction
with the Department of the Army Gorp of Engineers shall detexmine whether a404 permit shall be
required for alterations to wetland areas. The applicant, in conjunction with the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service shall detexmine if a 1OA permit or other restrictions of the NCB and
Endangered Species Act process is requid for hpacts to coastal sage saub habitat If applicable,
therewith. the applicant shall obtain said permits and comply with those conditions and reqtrirements imposed
4. Prior to approval of a final map, issuance of a grading pennit, or approval of improvement plans for Hidden Valley Road fi?om Poinsettia Park south to Pdomar Airport Road, the applicazq in
discussion with the Planning and hgheemg shall consider, if feasible, the
incorporation of an oyersized culvert under Hidden Valley Raid at the Endnas M- sassing to
mitigate the effects of fragmentation of the open space and wildlife amidor caused by the roadway,
and to Pnhwnce wildlife mobility in the area.
Geotechnid The applicant shall comply with all mitigation qukemeuts of the hpruIllnary Investigation for the project prepared by Pacific Soils &@memq, Inc., dated February 1989 and
any subsequent revisions to the report, prior to issuance of a grading permit
.. 5.
6. In addition to the conditio^^^ above, the project shall compfy with all the mitigation conditions of
Resolution No. 3525, dated June 16,1993. If Find EZR !XW3 is not ded by the City Council
tal review
Final EIR 90-03 for the Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203), as amtamed inPlanningcomrmssl '011
this Conditional Negative Dedaration shall become null and void and new
shallbereqrrired.
-11-
1~fACl-l MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (IF APPLICABLE)
VPLICANT CONCURRENCE w[TH MITIGATING MEASURES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE MITIGATING MEASURES
AND CONCUR W" THE ADDITION OF THESE MEASURES TO THE PROJECT.
-12-
..
-
-
AP
P
E
N
D
I
X
P
EN
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
MI
T
I
G
A
T
I
O
N
MO
N
I
T
O
R
I
N
G
CH
E
C
K
L
I
S
T
Pa
g
e
L
of
L
Y 3 a
bo
5 c m a -
v)
c
-0
.-
.-
Y m E
m X 4 1
w
a X
-0
a 5 ?
L3
a:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
1?
14
15
16
17
le
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3591
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO
CONDOMINIUM UNITS, 72 APARTMENT UNITS, AND TWO
FUTURE COMMUNITY FACILITY SITES, ALL ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE, NORTH
OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS, SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: SAMBI
DEVELOP 129 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, 76 TOWNHOMES, 72
CASE NO: CT 92-02
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter and the South 60
acres of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21,
Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and
Meridian, County of San Diego, State of California, according
10 United States Government Survey, approved October 25,
1875, according to the Official Plat thereof.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th, day of December,
1993, hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Vesting Tentative Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of CT 92-02, based on the following findings and subject
to the following conditions:
Findin=:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The project is consistent with the General Plan and Zone 20 Specific Plan since the
RM designation allows the development of low density apartment, condominium,
or townhome developments that range in density from 4 to 8 dudacre with a 6
dus/acre growth management control point. The RLM designation allows single-
family homes that range in density from 0 to 4 dwelling units per acre with a 3.2
dus/acre growth control point. The net density in the RLM portion of the project
is 9.18 dwelling units per acre and the net density in the RM portion is 4.4 dwelling
units per acre. The project contains a combination of an overall net density of 5.8
dus/acre, therefore, the project, exclusive of the density bonus request, is consistent
with the growth management dwelling unit allowance for the parcel.
The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the
District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot
occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
The project is in compliance with the adopted mitigation measures of Final
Environmental Impact Report 90-03 and would not create any additional significant
adverse environmental impacts.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
Unified School District.
PC RES0 3591 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the general plan.
The project complies with all requirements of Chapter 20.12 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code.
The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the development since the
site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate residential development at the
density proposed.
The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding future land use since
surrounding properties are designated for residential development on the general
plan.
The project is consistent with all policies of the Mello It Segment of the Local
Coastal Program.
The tentative map satisfies all requirements of the Title 20 and 21 of the Carlsbad
Municipal Code and the State Subdivision Map Act.
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
Recommendation of approval is granted for CT 92-02, as shown on Exhibits "A' -
"YYY'', dated December 15, 1993 incorporated by reference and on file in the
Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless
otherwise noted in these conditions.
This project shall comply with all conditions and mitigation measures which may
be required as part of the Zone 20 Local Facilities Management Plan and any
amendments made to that Plan prior to the issuance of building permits.
This project is approved upon the express condition that building permits will not
be issued for development of the subject property unless the District Engineer
determines that sewer facilities are available at the time of application for such
sewer permits and will continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note
shall be placed on the final map.
PC RES0 3591 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
E
S
1c
11
12
12
14
15
16
17
le
1s
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
2e
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
This project is also approved under the express conditions that the applicant pay the
public facilities fee adopted by the City Council on July 28, 1987 and as amended
from time to time, and any development fees established by the City Council
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code or other ordinance
adopted to implement a growth management system or facilities and improvement
plan and to fulfill the subdivider's agreement to pay the public facilities fee dated
February 12, 1992, a copy of which is on file with the City Clerk and is
incorporated by this reference. If the fees are not paid, this application will not be
consistent with the General Plan and approval for this project will be void.
If any condition for construction of any public improvements or facilities, or the
payment of any fees in lieu thereof, imposed by this approval or imposed by law on
this project are challenged this approval shall be suspended as provided in
Government Code Section 6591'3.5. If any such condition is determined to be
invalid, this approval shall be invalid unless the City Council determines that the
project without the conditions complies with all requirements of law.
Approval of this request shall not excuse compliance with all sections of the Zoning
Ordinance and all other applicable City ordinances in effect at time of building
permit issuance.
Approval of CX 92-02 is granted subject to the approval of the Conditional Negative
Declaration, PUD 92-03, SDP 92-06, HDP 92-03, SP 203, and Final EIR 90-03.
CT 92-02 is subject to all conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution
No. 3590 for the Conditional Negative Declaration.
The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible 24" x 36", mylar copy of
the Tentative Map as approved by the Planning Commission. The Tentative Map
shall reflect the conditions of approval by the City. The map copy shall be
submitted to the City Engineer and approved prior to building, grading, final map,
or improvement plan submittal, whichever occurs first.
A 500' scale map of the subdivision shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior
to the recordation of the final map. Said map shall show all lots and streets within
and adjacent to the project.
As part of the plans submitted for building permit plan check, the applicant shall
include a reduced version of the approving resolution/resolutions on a 24" x 36"
blueline drawing. Said blueline drawing(s) shall also include a copy of any
applicable Coastal Development Permit and signed approved site plan.
The applicant shall provide the following note on the ha1 map of the subdivision
and final mylar of this development submitted to the City:
PC RES0 3591 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
13
3.4
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
13.
14.
15.
16.
"Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code establishes a Growth Management
Control Point for each General Plan land use designation. Development cannot
exceed the Growth Control Point except as provided by Chapter 21.90. The land
use designation for this development is RLM and RM. The Growth Control Point
for these designations are 3.2 and 6 dwelling units per nonconstrained acre.
All parcels were used to calculate the intensity of development under the general
plan and Chapter 21 -90. Subsequent redevelopment or resubdivision of any one of
these parcels must also include all parcels under the general plan and Chapter 21.90
of the Carlsbad Municipal Code".
Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant shall receive approval of a Coastal
Development Permit issued by the California Coastal Commission that substantially
conforms to this approval. If the approval is substantially different, an amendment
to (TT 92-02 shall be required.
The applicant shall submit a street name list consistent with the City's street name
policy subject to the Planning Director's approval prior to final map approval.
The applicant shall pay park-in-lieu fees to the City, prior to the approval of the
final map as required by Chapter 20.44 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall establish a homeowner's association and corresponding
covenants, conditions and restrictions. Said CC&R's shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Director prior to final map approval.
The CC&R's shall include conditions stating the following provisions: (1) language
specifying the Homeowneis Association maintenance responsibility for all natural
open space and slope maintenance easements, and offsite manufactured slopes
shown on the approved tentative map and landscape plan (CT 92-02), which is on
file in the Planning Department; (2) In Area "D" (Lot 134), all paao coven and
decks that require a building permit shall conform to the setback and coverage
requirements of the underlying zone (RDM) and the accessory structure standards
of Title 21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; (3) In Area "D" (Lot 134) all trash cans
shall be stored inside the garage and out of view from the private street; (4) In
Area "A" (Lot 132) and Area I'D" (Lot 134) all dwelling units with a 5 foot setback
from the private street shall have garages installed with a automatic +rage door
opener and parking shall be prohibited on the driveway leading to the garage; (5)
Area "A" (Lot 132) is being approved as a condominium permit for residential
homeownership purposes. If any of the units in the project are rented, the
minimum time increment for such rental shall be not less than 26 days. A condition
so stating this shall be placed in the CC&R's for the project; and (6) all structures
and roofs within the project area shall be earth tone in color to reduce visual
impacts, according to the color boards approved by the Planning Dkector.
PC RES0 3591 5
c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
le
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
The applicant shall provide school fees to mitigate conditions of overcrowding as
part of building permit application. These fees shall be based on the fee scheduie
in effect at the time of building permit application.
Prior to the issuance of the building permit there shall be a Notice of Restriction
placed on the deed to this property subject to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director notifymg all interested parties and successors in interest that the City of
Carlsbad has issued a Vesting Tentative Map, Planned Development Permit, Site
Development Plan, and Hillside Development Permit by Resolutions No.'s 3591,
3592,. 3593, and 3594 on the real property owned by the declarant. Said Notice
of Restriction shall note the property description, location of the file containing
complete project details and all conditions of approval as well as any conditions or
restrictions specified for inclusion in the Notice of Restriction. Said Notice of
Restriction may be modified or terminated only with the approval of the Planning
Director, Planning Commission or City Council of the City of Carlsbad whichever has
final decision authority for this project.
All roof appurtenances, including air conditions, shall be architecturally integrated
and concealed from view and sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets,
in substance as provided in Building Department Policy No. 80-6, to the satisfaction
of the Directors of Planning and Building.
In Area "A" (Lot 132 & 133) and "D" (Lot 134), all visitor parking spaces shall be
striped a different color than the assigned resident parking spaces and shall be
clearly marked as may be approved by the Planning Director prior to occupancy of
individual units.
The developer shall display a current Zoning and Land Use Map in the sales office
at all times, or suitable alternative to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
Trash receptacle areas in Area "A" (Lot 132 & 133) and "D" Lot 134) shall be
enclosed by a six foot high masonry wall with gates pursuant to City standards.
The enclosure shall be of similar colors and/or materials to the project to the
Satisfaction of the Planning Director.
For Area "A" (Lot 132 & 133) and 'ID" (Lot 134) an exterior lighting pl& including
parking areas shall be submitted for Planning Director approval prior to issuance of
building permits. All lighting shall be designed to reflect downward and avoid any
impacts on adjacent homes or property.
The applicant shall submit a wall and fencing plan subject to Planning Director
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
PC RES0 3591 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
1%
12
14
15
16
17
le
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
28
2s.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit detailed building
elevations and floor plans of the recreational buildings in Area "A" (Lot 132) and
"D" (Lot 134) subject to approval by the Planning Director.
Prior to approval of the final map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs
first, the applicant shall establish a process to notify, to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director and City Attorney, all owners, users and tenants of this project
that a community park site is located to the west the project.
This project shall comply with the requirements of the Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP
203).
To service this development the project shall provide bus stop facilities at locations
subject to the satisfaction of the North County Transit District. Said facilities shall
at a minimum include a bench, free from advertising, and a pole for the bus stop
sign. The bench and pole shall be designed in a manner so as to not detract fiom
the basic architectural theme of the project and said design shall be subject to the
approval of the Planning Director and North County Transit District.
Prior to approval of the final map, the owner proposing a future community facility
development shall obtain Planning Director approval of a program to disclose the
potential community facility use to future owners of the surrounding properties.
Prior to approval of the hal map an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of
Cdsbad, Open Space District or other similar entity designated by the City of
Carlsbad, for a perpetual easement for public trails over, upon and across Lot 132
as shown on the tentative map shall be made on the final map for trails that are
part of the Carlsbad Trail System, see Exhibit "A", dated December 15, 1993.
If prior to recordation of final map, the City of Carlsbad adopts the financing
mechanism necessary to implement the Carlsbad Trail System, the trails shown on
the tentative map shall be constructed prior to occupancy of: the first unit (within
a phase), and shall be constructed by the developer, pursuant to the guidelines of
the Open Space and Conservation Resource Management Plan, and dedicated to the
City of Carlsbad. If the City of Carlsbad accepts dedication of the trail easement,
the City shall assume responsibility, maintenance and liability for the trail(s).
If prior to recordation of final map, the City of Carkbad does not adopt the
financing mechanism necessary to implement the Carlsbad Trail System, the
applicant will not be required to construct the proposed trails. Said trail easement
shall be maintained by the Homeowner Association as shall be stated in the CC&R's.
PC RES0 3591 7
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
€
s
1c
11
I 12
12
14
1t
1E
17
1€
15
2c
. 21
2:
2:
24
25
26
27
2E
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Prior to final map approval the 24 foot wide driveway in Area "D" (Lot 134) which
leads to the recreational vehicle storage area shall be widened to 30 feet to comply
with the requirements of the Planned Development Ordinance.
Prior to final map approval Building 12 in kea "A" (Lot 132) shall be setback 5 feet
fiom the private street leading to the unit.
Prior to approval of the final map for Area "B" and "C" (single-family lots) the
applicant shall process a Site Development Plan which shall address: (1) provisions
for a percentage of single-story homes along the ridge; (2) building height; (3)
distance between structures and building placement on the lot; (4) distance from
top of slopes; (5) slopes of roofs; and, (6) building materials and colors.
Affordable Housing - Conditions:
PC RES0 3591 8
This project is approved, subject to the condition that the required income-restricted
units shall be constructed concurrent with the project's market rate units, unless
both the final decision making authority of the City and the developer agree within
an Affordable Housing Agreement to an alternate schedule for development.
The project shall construct 63 housing units affordable to persons and families of
lower income and comply with all the requirements of the Affordable Housing Plan
of the Zone 20 Specific Plan (SP 203). Six (6) of the 63 units shall have 3 or more
bedrooms.
Prior to final map approval, an Affordable Housing Agreement shall be required to
be submitted by the applicant to the City, approved by the Planning Director and
Director of Housing and Redevelopment, and completed and recorded as a deed
restriction on those units of the project which are designated for the location of
low-income affordable units. The Affordable Housing Agreement shall be binding
to all future owners and successors in interest. The Affordable Housing Agreement,
for which the inclusionary housing requirement will be satisfied through new
construction of inclusionary units on-site, shall establish, but not be limited to, the
following:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
The number of inclusionaxy dwelling units proposed;
The unit size(s) (square footage) of the inclusionary units and
the number of bedrooms per inclusionary dwelling units;
The proposed location of the inclusionary units;
Tenure of affordability for inclusionaxy units (useful life of the
dwelling unit);
Schedule for production of the dwelling units;
hcmtives and/or financial assistance provided by the City;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
1%
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
2e
g. Where applicable, terms and conditions establishing rules and
procedures for qualifying tenants, setting rental rates, filling
vacancies, and operating and maintaining Units for affordable
inclusionary dwelling units;
Standards modifications granted by the City. h.
Sign Conditions:
37. Prior to occupancy of any of residential units in Area "A" (tot 132 & 133) and "D
(Lot 134), the applicant shall construct a directory sign at the entrance to the
project. The design of this sign shall be approved by the Planning Director.
38. Building identification and/or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing
buildings so as to be plainly visible from the street or access road; color of
identification and/or addresses shall contrast to their background color.
39. , Any signs proposed for this development shall at a minimum be designed in
conformance with the City's Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval
of the Planning Director prior to installation of such signs.
Landscape Conditions:
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
The applicant shall prepare a detailed landscape and irrigation plan which shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the approval of the
final map.
AU landscaping shall comply with the Landscape Requirements of the Zone 20
Specific Plan (SP 230).
Prior to approval of building permits, all manufactured off-site slopes created by this
project shall be landscaped to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, and shall
include at a minimum, landscaping to control erosion and to provide visual
screening of the slopes.
Prior to approval of the final map, the applicant shall establish a 10 foot landscape
easement along the project's street frontage on Hidden Valley Road. These planting
easements shall be planted by the applicant per the landscape requirements of the
Zone 20 Spe&c Plan prior to occupancy of individual units.
AU building pad and street areas that are graded and remain vacant or undeveloped
for a period of more than 6 months after the grading operation is completed shall
be seeded to reduce erosion and visual impacts. Lf grading is phased, the six month
time period shall start at the completion of each individual grading phase.
PC RES0 3591 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
s
1c
11
12
12
14
15
le
11
1E
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
2e
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54;
55.
56.
57.
....
All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, frtz
from weeds, trash and debris.
The developer shall install street trees at the equivalent of 40-foot intervals a1cr.g
all public street frontages in conformance with City of Carlsbad standards. The
trees shall be of a variety selected from the approved Street Tree List.
All landscape plans shall be prepared to conform with the Landscape Manual aid
submitted per the landscape plan check procedures on file in the Planning
Department.
Landscape plans shall be designed to minimize water use. Lawn and other zone 1
plants (see Landscape Manual) shall be limited to areas of special visual importance
or high use. Mulches shall be used and irrigation equipment and design shail
promote water conservation.
The developer shall avoid trees that have invasive root systems, produce excessi:-e
litter and/or too large relative to the lot size.
Prior to final occupancy, a letter from a California licensed landscape architect shail
be submitted to the Planning Director certifymg that all landscaping has been
installed as shown on the approved landscape plans.
All herbicides shall be applied by applicators licensed by the State of California.
The applicant shall pay a landscape plan check and inspection fee as required by
Section 20.08.050 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The first set of landscape and irrigation plans submitted shall include building plars,
improvement plans and grading plans.
All landscape and irrigation plans shall show existing and proposed contours and
shall match the grading plans in terms of scale and location of improvements.
The minimum shrub size shall be 5 gallons. One (1) gallon shrub sizes may be used
if it is deemed to be more beneficial for the long term survivability of the plants as
determined by the Planning Director.
The number of trees in the project shall be equal to or greater than the number cf
residential units.
20% of the trees in the project shall be 24” box or greater.
PC RES0 3591 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Environmental Mitigation Conditions:
58.
59.
60.
To offset the conversion of non-prime agricultural land to urban land uses per the
requirements of the Mello 11 Local Coastal Program, prior to hal map approval, the
applicant shall execute an agreement to pay a $~O,oOO.OO (per converted acre)
agricultural mitigation fee. The fee shall be paid prior to issuance of a building
permit.
Compliance with APCD Rdes 51 (The “Nuisance” Rule), 52 (Partidate Matter),
and 54 (Dust and Fumes) of the Air Quality Chapter would effectively mitigate dust
impacts generated during grading operations. A note shall be placed on the grading
permit stipulating that the following measures shall be required to achieve
compliance with these rules, and reduce construction-related air pollutants:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
The watering of all surfaces being graded and haul routes shall be
required during dry weather conditions.
All unpaved areas shall be revegetated according to approved
landscape plans as soon as possible after grading.
All construction-related traffic shall be restricted to routes that are
dust-controlled, and reduced speed limits shall be maintained for all
haul and construction vehicles.
All construction activities shall be limited during periods of high
winds.
All heavy-duty, diesel-powered consmction equipment shall be
operated according to manufactureIs suggested operating instruction
(with the fuel-injection timing retarded to recommended levels for
NO, emissions, but which would not result in excessive visible smoke
emissions) in order to control pollutant emissions.
Construction equipment shall be subject to regularly scheduled
maintenance/tune-ups, and be turned off when not being utilized to
avoid excessive idling emissions.
The application of architectural coating and cut-back asphalt shall
adhere to APCD Rdes 67.0 and 67.7, to effectively control other
construction-related emissions of air pollutants.
The Engineering Department shall monitor for compliance during all
grading operations of the project.
The Homeowners Association and apartment project owner shall obtain and
distribute to owners and tenants annual information from Caltrans and North
County Transit regarding the availability of public transportation, ride-sharing, and
transportation pooling services in the area. This information shall also be provided
in the sales and rental offices of the project. A condition so stating this shall also
be placed in the CC&R’s for the project.
PC RES0 3591 11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
11
12
12
14
15
16
17
le
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
2e
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
....
....
Prior to approval of a grading permit a detailed soils testing and analysis report
shall be prepared by registered soils engineer and submitted to the Planning
Department and County Health Department for review and approval. The report
shall identify a range of possible mitigation measures to remediate any potentially
significant public health impacts if hazardous pesticides or other chemicals are
detected at high concentrations in the soil. '
Prior to occupancy of individual units a solid wall or fence, and landscaped
windbreaks shall be installed along the perimeter of any future developable area
that abuts property under "open field'' cultivation, in order to reduce public nuisance
effects of adjacent pesticide spraying and dust generation from farm vehicles and
operations.
Prior to approval of the final map or issuance of a building permit, which ever
occurs first, a minimum 25-foot wide open space easement shall be provided
between "open field" agricultural operations and the adjacent lot lines of future
developable areas onsite. This buffer area may be located on the adjacent
agricultural property.
Prior to approval of a final map or issuance of a building permit, which ever occurs
first, an infi-astructure improvement plan shall be submitted to the Planning and
Engineering Departments for review and approval by the Planning Director and City
Engineer. This plan shall illustrate the temporary road connections required to
maintain continued access to adjacent agricultural properties that could be impacted
by future roadway improvements.
Drainage water from buildings, streets, parking lots, and landscaped areas within
the project shall be disposed of through stormdrains or otherwise in a manner that
will avoid any runoff onto agricultural areas whether planted or fallow. All runoff
agricultural and urban shall conform with the National Pollution Discharge and
Elimination System Permit requirements pursuant to San Diego Regional Water
Quality Control Board Order No. 9042, adopted by City Council Resolution No. 90-
235.
Prior to approval of the final map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs
first, the applicant shall establish a process to notify, to the satisfaction of the
Plaming Director and City Attorney, all owners, users and tenants of'& project
that this area is subject to dust, pesticides, and odors associated with adjacent
agricultural operations, and that the owners, users, and tenants occupy this area at
their on risk.
PC RES0 3591 12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1c
11
12
12
14
15
16
17
1I
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
28
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
Paleontology:
a. Prior to any grading of the project site, a paleontologist shall be retained to perform a walkover survey of the site and to review the
grading plans to determine if the proposed grading will impact fossil
resources. A copy of the paleontologist's report shall be provided to
the Planning Director prior to issuance of a grading pennit.
A qualified paleontologist shall be retained to perform periodic
inspections of the site and to salvage exposed fossils. Due to the
small nature of some of the fossils present in the geologic strata, it
may be necessary to collect matrix samples for laboratory processing
through fine screens. The paleontologist shall make periodic reports
to the Planning Director during the grading process.
The paleontologist shall be allowed to divert or direct grading in the
area of an exposed fossil in order to facilitate evaluauon and, if
necessary, salvage artifacts.
All fossils collected shall be donated to a public, non-profit institution
with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Diego
Natural History Museum. Any conflicts regarding the role of the paleontologist and the grading
activities of the project shall be resolved by the Planning Director.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Prior to issuance of a building permit the project shall comply with the City of
Carlsbad's standards for solid waste management.
AU grading shall comply with the recommendations of Pacific Soils Engineering, hc.
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation dated February 6, 1989 and any subsequent
amendments, and on file in the Planning Department.
To reduce the Visual impacts of the project, a percentage of single-family homes
along the north/south trending and gently sloping ridgeline shall be one-story in
height and have varying roof lines. Prior to approval of the final map the applicant
shall establish a mechanism to guarantee that a percentage of the homes in Area "B"
are constructed as one-story, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director.
All structures and roofs within the project shall be earth tone in color. Prior to
issuance of the first building permit the applicant shall submit to the Planning
Department a sample color board depicting the proposed earth tones subject to the
approval of the Pl&g Director.
To reduce the Visual impacts of manufactured slopes and roadway Cuts, all cut and
fill slopes shall be landform-graded, contoured, and heavily screened by landscaping
in conformance with Specific Plan 203. All planted slopes shall be watered with a
PC RES0 3591 13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
S
1c
11
12
12
14
1:
1E
15
1E
1S
2c
21
22
2:
24
2:
2E
25
2E
73.
74.
complete irrigation system using low precipitation-rate sprinkler heads to stabilize
exposed slopes and curtail visual impacts associated with possible erosion.
Prior to approval of a final map, improvement plans shall be submitted to the
Engineering Department showing locations and sizing of reclaimed and or urban
runoff diversion facilities, in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Water District
requirements and the phasing schedule provided in the Zone 20 LFMP. Reclaimed
water facilities shall be constructed in all major roadways within the project.
Prior to final map approval, the applicant shall be required: (1) to consult with U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (EWS) regarding the impact of the project on the Coastal
California Gnatcatcher; and, (2) be issued any permits required by the FWS.
Endeerinn - Conditions:
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
Direct access rights for all lots abutting Hidden Valley Road, Cherry Blossom.Road
west of Alga Road and Alga Road shall be waived on the hal map.
This project is located Within the Meuo I1 Local Coastal Plan. AU development
design shall comply with the requirements of that plan.
Unless a standards variance has been issued, no variance from City Standards is
authorized by virtue of approval of this tentative map.
The applicant shall comply with all the rules, regulations and design requirements
of the respective sewer and water agencies regarding services to the project.
The applicant shall be responsible for coordination with S.D.G.&E., Pacific Bell
Telephone, and Cable TV authorities.
The applicant shall provide an acceptable means for maintaining the private
easements within the subdivision and all the private: streets, sidewalks, street lights,
storm drain facilities and sewer facilities located therein and 'to distribute the costs
of such maintenance in an equitable manner among the owners of the properties
within the subdivision. Adequate provision for such maintenance shall be included
with the CC&R's subject to the approval of the City Engineer prior to final map
approval.
A note to the effect of the following shall be placed on a separate sheet of the final
map. All improvements are private and are to be privately maintained with the
exception of the following:
a. Hidden Valley Road, Cherry Blossom Road, Alga Road and Camino de las
Ondas.
PC RES0 3591 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
le
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
b. The sewer and water improvements beneath the private internal streets.
A note shall be placed on the improvement plans stating which utilities are public
and which are private.
Approval of this tentative tract map shall expire twenty-four (24) months from the
date of City Council approval unless a final map is recorded. An extension may be
requested by the applicant. Said extension shall be approved or denied at the
discretion of the City Council. In approving an extension, the City Council may
impose new conditions and may revise existing conditions pursuant to Section
20.12.1 10(a)(2) Carlsbad Municipal Code.
The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its
agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or null an approval of the
City, the Planning Commission or City Engineer which has been brought against the
City within the time period provided for by Section 66499.37 of the Subdivision
Map Act.
Prior to issuance of a building permit €or any buildable lot within the subdivision,
the property owner shall pay a one-time special development tax in accordance with
City Council Resolution No. 91 -39.
The applicant shall pay the current local drainage area fee prior to approval of the
final map for this project or shall construct drainage systems in conformance with
Master Drainage Plan and City of Carlsbad Standards as required by the City
Engineer.
Prior to final map approval the applicant shall pay all current fees and deposits
required.
Prior to approval of the final map, the owner shall enter into an agreement with the
City to pay any drainage area fees established as a result of the Master Drainage
Plan Update.
The owner of the subject property shall execute an agreement holdhg the City
harmless regarding drainage across the adjacent property prior to approval of the
final map for this project.
Based upon a review of the proposed grading and the grading quantities shown on
the tentative map, a grading permit for this project is required. Prior to final map
approval, the applicant must submit and receive approval for grading plans in
accordance with City Codes and standards.
PC RES0 3591 15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
E
S
1c
11
12
12
14
15
1E
17
1E
1s
2c
21
22
2:
24
25
26
27
2e
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
Upon completion of grading, the applicant shall ensure that an "as-graded" geologic
plan is submitted to the City Engineer. The plan' shall clearly show all the geology
as exposed by the grading operation, all geologic corrective measures as actually
constructed and must be based on a contour map which represents both the pre and
post site grading. This plan shall be signed by both the soils engineer and the
engineering geologist. The plan shall be prepared on a 24" x 36" mylar or similar
drafting film and shall become a permanent record.
No grading shall occur outside the limits of the subdivision unless a grading or slope
easement is obtained from the owners of the affected properties. If the applicant
is unable to obtain the grading or slope easement, no grading permit will be issued.
In that case the applicant must either amend the tentative map or change the slope
so grading will not occur outside the project site in a manner which substantially
conforms to the approved tentative map as determined by the City Engineer and
Planning Director.
Prior to hauling dirt or construction materials to or from any proposed construction
site within this project, the applicant shall submit to and receive approval from [he
City Engineer for the proposed haul route. The applicant shall comply with all
conditions and requirements the City Engineer may impose with regards to the
hauling operation.
PC RES0 3591 16
The developer shall exercise special care during the construction phase of this
project to prevent offsite siltation. Planting and erosion control shall be provided
in accordance with the Carlsbad Municipal Code and the City Engineer. Reference
Chapter 11.06.
The applicant shall construct desiltation/detention/urban pollutant basin(s) of a
type and a size and at location(s) as approved by the City Engineer. The applicant
shall enter into a basin maintenance agreement and submit a maintenance bond
satisfactory to the City Engineer prior to. the approval of grading, building permit
or final map whichever occurs first for this project. Each basin shall be serviced by
an all-weather access/maintenance road.
Additional drainage easements may be required. Drainage structures shall be
provided for prior to the issuance of grading or building permit as may-be required
by the City Engineer.
The owner shall make an offer of dedication to the City for all public streets and
easements required by these conditions or shown on the tentative map. The offer
shall be made by a certificate on the final map for this project. All land so offered
shall be granted to the City free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without
cost to the City. Streets that are already public are not required to be rededicated.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1:
14
15
16
17
1Ei
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
28
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
Some improvements shown on the tentative map and/or required by these
conditions are located offsite on property which neither the City nor the owner has
sufficient title or interest to permit the improvements to be made without
acquisition of title or interest. The applicant shall conform to Section 20.16.095 of
the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This conditional approval is null and void if title to
said property is not obtained, unless the City Engineer and Planning Director make
findings of substantial conformance without construction of said improvements.
Prior to approval of any grading or building permits for this project, the owner shall
give written consent to the annexation of the area shown within rhe boundaries of
the site plan into the existing City of Carlsbad Street Lighting and Landscaping
District No. 1 on a form provided by the City.
The drainage system shall be designed to ensure that runoff resulting from 10-year
frequency storms of 6 hours and 24 hours duration under developed conditions, are
equal to or less than the runoff from a storm of rhe same frequency and duration
under existing developed conditions. Both 6 hour and 24 hour storm durations shall
be analyzed to determine the detention basin capacities necessary to accomplish the
desired results prior to final map approval, issuance of building or grading permits
whichever occurs first.
The applicant shall comply with the City's requirements of the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The applicant shall provide best
management practices to reduce surface pollutants to an acceptable level prior to
discharge to sensitive areas. Plans for such improvements shall be approved by the
City Engineer prior to approval of the final map, issuance of grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first.
This project is specifically approved as four (4) units for the purposes of recording.
Plans, specifications, and supporting documents for all public improvements shall
be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Prior to ,approval of final map
in accordance with City Standards, the applicant shall install, or agree to install and
secure with appropriate security as provided by law, improvements shown on rhe
tentative map and the following improvements:
With the First Final Map
A. Alga Road onsite and offsite to Camino de Las Ondas shall be improved to
fidl major arterial standards, including all necessary drainage and subsurface
Utilities.
B. Alga Road offsite from Camino de las Ondas to Poinsettia Lane shall be fully
graded to major arterial standards. Full landscaped median, two 14 foot
PC RES0 3591 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
€
S
1c
11
12
12
14
If
1E
17
I€
1s
2c
21
22
2:
24
2E
26
27
2€
....
C.
D.
E.
F.
wide traffic lanes on either side of the median, all necessary drainage
facilities and any subsurface utility lines that may be required are to be
improved.
Cherry Blossom Road shall be constructed to full collector street standards
fkom Alga Road to Hidden Valley Road including all drainage sewer and
utility improvements.
Hidden Valley Road offsite from Cherry Blossom Road to Palomar Airport
Road shall be constructed with a 28 foot wide paved roadway with sufficient
drainage control facilities as may be required by the City Engineer, including
environmental mitigation improvements and sewer, water, and utilities that
would be located underneath the 28 foot wide roadway.
Modification to the median island on Palomar &port Road at the
intersection with Hidden Valley Road to provide appropriate left turn pockets
onto Hidden Valley Road.
Fully actuated traffic signals at Hidden Valley RoaUPalomar Airport Road,
Alga Road/Poinsettia Lane and Alga RoaWCherry Blossom Road. Actual
construction of the above noted signals shall be at the direction of the City
Engineer when traffic signal warrants are met. The developer is eligible for
reimbursement for the installation of the traffic signals at Hidden Valley
Road/Palomar Airport Road (PAR) and Alga Road/Poinsettia Lane from
Public Facilities Fees collected by the City. The cost of the median island
modifications on PAR to provide left turn pockets is not eligible for
reimbursement.
Area A
A. Full improvement of Chew Blossom Road east of Alga Road including all
improvements on and offsite necessary to complete the temporary cul-de-sac
and handle the drainage needs.
B. Full improvement of Camino de las Ondas on and offsite from Alga Road east
to the temporary cul-de-sac to local street standards including aJ necessary
drainage and utility improvements.
C. Full improvement of the temporary sewer pump station and force main.
D. All onsite and offsite sewer, water and utility improvement necessary to sewe
Area k
PC RES0 3591 18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2%
23
24
25
26
27
28
103.
104.
105.
106.
Area B
A. AU onsite sewer, water and utility improvement necessary to serve Area B.
Area C
A. All onsite sewer, water and utility improvements necessary to serve Area C.
B. Public access trail h-om Antherium Drive to Hidden Valley Road.
Area D
k Hidden Valley Road adjacent to Area D to one half of super collector street
standards including all necessary drainage improvements and all utility
improvements required beneath the pavement section.
B. All onsite sewer, water and utility improvements necessary to serve Area D.
C. Public access trail from Antherium Drive to Hidden Valley Road.
A note to this effect shall be placed on an additional map sheet on the final map per
the provisions of Sections 66434.2 of the Subdivision Map Act. Improvements listed
above shall be constructed within 18 months of approval of the secured
improvement agreement or such other time as provided in said agreement.
The developer shall install street lights along all public and private street frontages
in conformance with City of Carlsbad Standards.
The design of all private streets and drainage systems shall be approved by the City
Engineer prior to approval of the final map for this project. The structural section
of all private streets shall conform to City of Carlsbad Standards based on R-value
tests. All private streets and drainage systems shall be inspected by the City, and
the standard improvement plan check and inspection fees shall be paid prior to
approval of the final map for this project.
Prior to issuance of the 51% building permit within Area C a secondary access road
shall be constructed consistent with City Standards.
The 20 foot public access easement shown along the southern boundary of Area D
shall be increased to 30 feet if the developer and the City are unable to secure an
additional 10 foot access easement from the adjacent property owner to the south
or if no walls or fencing are placed within the stated 30 foot pedestrian area a 20
foot wide pedestrian easement shall be sufficient subject to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer prior to find map recordation.
PC RES0 3591 19
1
2
3
4
5
E
7
E
E
1c
13
1:
12
14
If
1t
17
1E
1E
2(
21
2:
21
24
2:
2E
25
2E
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
The internal lot drainage shown for Area A shall be redesigned to accommodate the
proposed surface and recreational improvements, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer.
The units within Area D are proposed to be recorded within a single final map.
Should the developer wish to record these units on multiple final maps, the phasing
for construction of the internal improvements, for such multiple maps must be
approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
Prior to final map approval, the subdivider shall secure the dedication of all the
offsite easements necessary to construct the offsite sewer, water, drainage, slope and
roadway improvements required by these conditions.
The alignment of Hidden Valley Road shown on Sheet 2 of the tentative map is
specifically not approved. Prior to submittal of the final map the subdivider shall
realign Hidden Valley Road approximately 10 feet to the east between Stations 58
and 70 to provide additional room for the riparian mitigation on the west side of
Hidden Valley Road.
Hidden Valley Road shall be dedicated to the City from the subdivision boundary to
Palomar Airport Road, based upon a right-of-way width of 68 feet including all
necessary slope and drainage easements.
Alga Road shall be dedicated to the City from the subdivision boundary to Poinsettia
Lane based on a right-of-way width of 102 feet including all necessary slope and
drainage easements.
Camino de las Ondas shall be dedicated to the City from Alga Road to the end of
the temporary cul-de-sac as shown on the tentative map.
Carlsbad Munici~al - Water District Conditions:
114. The entire potable water system, reclaimed water system and sewer system shall be
evaluated in detail to insure that adequate capacity, pressure and flow demands are
met.
115. The Developer shall be responsible for all fees, deposits and charges which will be
collected at time of issuance of the building permit. The San Diego County Water
Authority capacity charge will be collected at issuance of application for meter
installation.
116. Sequentially, the Developers Engineer shall do the following:
PC RES0 3591 20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
117.
118.
....
a. Meet with the City Fire Marshal and establish the fire protection
requirements.
b. Prepare a colored reclaimed water use area map and submit to the Planning
Department or processing and approval.
c. Schedule a meeting with the District Engineer for review, comment and
approval of the preliminary system layout usage (G.P.M. - E.D.U.) plan for
potable, reclaimed and sewer systems prior to the preparation of
improvement plans.
This project is approved upon the expressed condition chat building permits will nor
be issued for development of the subject property unless the warer district serving
the development determines that adequate water. service and sewer facilities are
available at the time of application for such water service and sewer permits will
continue to be available until time of occupancy. This note shall be placed on the
final map.
Developer shall be responsible for the following systemsfies:
A. Potable Systems:
1. Install 12" line in Hidden Valley Road from south property line to
north property line. Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement if
oversizing of line ocm. (375 H.G.)
Install 12" line (375 H.G.) in Woodruff Road and Coneflower Drive.
Install 12" line (550 H.G.) in Woodruff Road, Coneflower Drive,
Cherry Blossom Road and Narcissus Drive.
Install 18" line (375 H.G.) in Alga Road. Developer shall be eligible
for reimbursement.
Install 12" line (550 H.G.) in Alga Road from south to north property
lines.
The District has an existing 6" waterline (potable) along the southerly
property line. Developer shall relocate at his expense.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
B) Reclaimed Systems:
1.
2.
3.
Install 12" line in Alga Road from north to south property lines.
Install lines to adequately serve area "A" and area "D".
Install system to service all open space and slopes as determined by
District.
PC RES0 3591 21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C) Sewer Systems:
1. Pursuant to local facilities management plan Zone 20, install 8" local
trunk line in Hidden Valley Road horn southerly property line to San
Marcos tnterceptor line (gravity).
Install 12" trunk line (VBT2 per Zone 20) in Laurel Tree Drive (or
Alga Road).
2.
Any temporary sewer service alternates must be approved by the District
Engineer.
Fire Conditions:
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
Additional on-site public'water mains and fire hydrants are required.
Applicant shall submit a site plan to the Fire Department for approval, which depicts
location of required, proposed and existing public water mains and fire hydrants.
The plan should include off-site fire hydrants within 200 feet of the project.
Applicant shall submit a site plan depicting emergency access routes, driveways and
traffic circulation for Fire Department approval.
An all weather, unobstructed access road suitable for emergency service vehicles
shall be provided and maintained during construction. When in the opinion of the
Fire Chief, the access road has become unserviceable due to inclement weather or
other reasons, he may, in the interest of public safety, require that construction
operations cease until the condition is corrected.
All required water mains, fire hydrants and appurtenances shall be operational
before combustible building materials are located on the construction site.
All security gage systems controlling vehicular access shall be equipped with a
"Knox", key-operated emergency entry device. Applicant shall contact the Fire
Prevention Bureau for specifications and approvals prior to ins tallation.
Plans and/or specifications for fire alarm systems, fire hydrants, auiomatic fire
sprinkler systems and orher fire protection systems shall be submitted to the Fire
Department for approval prior to construction.
An approved automatic fire sprinkler system shall be installed in buildings having
an aggregate floor area exceeding 10,000 square feet.
The applicant shall provide a street map which conforms to the following
requirements: A 400 scale photo-reduction mylar, depicting proposed improvements
PC RES0 3591 22
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
and at least two existing intersections or streets. The map shall also clearly depict
street centerlines, hydrant locations and street names.
A monument sign shall be installed at the entrance to the driveway or private street
indicating the addresses of the buildings on site.
128.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of December, 1993,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN :
BAILEY NOBLE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 3591 23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3592
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO DEVELOP 129 SINGLE-
FAMILY LOTS, 76 TOWNHOMES, 72 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, 72
APARTMENT UNITS, AND TWO FUTURE COMMUNITY FACILITY
SITES, ALL ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO
DEL NORTE, NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS, AND SOUTH OF
PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
PLAN ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: SAMBI
CASE NO: PUD 92-03
WHEREAS, a verified application for certain property to wit:
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter and the South 60
acres of the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21,
Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and
Meridian, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to United States Government Survey, approved October 25,
1875, according to the Official Plat thereof.
has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did, on the 15th day of December, 1993
hold a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider said request; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to the Planned Development Permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
as follows:
A) That the above recitations are true and correct.
....
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, lhe Commission
recommends APPROVAL of PUD 92-03, based on the following findings and subjecr
to the following conditions:
Findinas:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The project is consistent with the Zone 20 Specific Plan since the RM designation
allows the development of low density apartment, condominium, or townhome
developments that range in density fkom 4 to 8 dus/acre with a 6 dus/acre growth
management conrrol point. The RLM designation allows single-family homes that
range in density from 0 to 4 dwelling units per acre with a 3.2 dus/acre growth
control point. The net density in the RLM portion of the project is 9.18 dwelling
units per acre and the net density in the RM portion is 4.4 dwelling units per acre.
The project contains a combination of an overall net density of 5.8 dus/acre,
therefore, the project, exclusive of the density bonus request, is consistent with the
growth management dwelling unit allowance for the parcel.
The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the
District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building cannot
occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
The project is in compliance with the adopted mitigation measures of Final
Environmental Impact Report 90-03 and would not create any additional significant
adverse environmental impacts.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
Unified School District.
PC RES0 NO 3592 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
E
s
1c
11
12
12
14
15
1C
17
1E
1s
2c
21
2:
2:
24
2:
26
27
2€
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
....
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriace
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be availabie
concurrent with- need as required by the general plan.
The project complies with all-requirements of Chapter 20.12 of the Carisbad
Municipal Code.
The granting of this permit will not adversely affect and will be consistent with
Chapter 21.45, the Zone 20 Specific Plan, and all adopted plans of the City and
other governmental agencies.
The proposed use is necessaq and desirable to provide a service or facility which
will contribute to the long-term general well-being of the neighborhood and the
community, because the development of two community facility sites, single-family
lots, condominiums, townhomes, and apartments would provide a balance and mix
of land uses within the Zone 20 Specific Plan. A majority of the residential
development planned for the specific plan area would be standard single-family
homes on 7,500 to 10,000 square foot lots. The development of higher density
multi-family units in close proximity to natural open space, Poinsettia Community
Park, and future Alga Road, in addition to the provision of apartment units
affordable to lower income household would create a more diversified and balanced
community.
Such use will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity, because the project is designed to preserve the coastal sage scrub habitat
located along the eastern portion of Area "A". This open space would connect with
the larger open space located in the central canyon. Drainage facilities would be
provided concurrent with development of the project to reduce erosion and flooding.
All manufactured slopes would be landscaped to prevent erosion and' to visually
screen the slopes.
The proposed planned development meets aIl of the minimum development
standards set forth in Section 21.45.090, the design criteria set forth in Section
21.45.080, and has been designed in accordance with the concepts contained in the
Design Guidelines Manual for the following reasons:
PC RES0 NO 3592 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
15
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
15.
16.
17.
a.
b.
C.
d.
The local streets in the single-family portion of the project would have curb,
gutter, and sidewalks on both sides, and have 36 to 40 feet of paving. This
exceeds the 30 foot minimum private street width standard.
The project would provide a mixture of one and two-story homes, and the
multi-family buildings would have varied roof lines, and a variety of front
building elevations and front yard setbacks.
Adequate recreational vehicle storage space would be provided within the
individual projects and be sufficiently screened from the public right-of-way
and surrounding properties.
The single-family homes would have, at a minimum two car garages which
would meet the parking and storage requirements of the ordinance, and
guest parking would be provided on both sides of the streets. The
condominiums and townhomes all have two covered parking spaces,
including garages and carports for residents, and guest parking is dispersed
along the internal driveways.
The proposed project is designed to be sensitive to and blend in with the natural
topography of the site, and maintains and enhances sigTllficant natural resources on
the site, because the project meets all the requirements of the HiUside Developmenr
Regulations and Guidelines, except the 30 foot slope height standard as permitted
per the Site Development Plan. The manufactured slopes would be landscaped, and
the single-family lots would terrace down the slope towards the west to conform
with the topography. The homes have roof lines that are varied and relate to the
topography. In addition, the northeastern comer of the site would be preserved to
protect the coastal sage habitat and to provide open space in the central canyon.
The project's circulation system is designed to be efficient and well integrated with
the project and does not dominate the project the local streets in the project
The proposed project's design and density of the developed portion of the site is
compatible with surrounding development and does not create a disharmonious or
disruptive element to the neighborhood.
General Planninn Conditions:
1. Recommendation of approval is granted for PUD 92-03, as shown on Exhibits "A" -
'W', dated December 15, 1993 incorporated by reference and on file in the
Planning Department. Development shall occur substantially as shown unless
otherwise noted in these conditions.
PC RES0 NO 3592 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2. Approval of PUD 92-03 is granted subject to the approval of CT 92-02, SDP 92-06,
HDP 92-03, and the Conditional Negative Declaration.
All conditions of approval for the CT 92-02 as contained in Planning Resolution No.
3591 are applicable and incorporated through this reference.
3.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of December, 1993,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO 3592
BAILEY NOBLE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
PLANNING COMMtSStON RESOLUTION NO. 3593
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SITE
TOWNHOMES, 72 CONDOMINIUM UNITS, 72 APARTMENT UNITS,
AND TWO FUTURE COMMUNITY FACILITY SITES, ALL ON
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE,
NORTH OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS, SOUTH OF PALOMAR
AIRPORT ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE
20.
CASE NAME: SAMBI
CASE NO: SDP 92-06
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO DEVELOP 129 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, 76
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the City of Carlsbad and
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constitutes a request as provided by Title
21 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on the 15th day of December, 1993, consider said request on property
described as:
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter and the South 60 acres of
the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 12
South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to United States Government
Survey, approved October 25, 1875, according to the Official Plat
thereof.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to SDP 92-06.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Cornmission
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) . That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2:
24
25
26
27
2e
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commission
recommends APPROVAL of SDP 92-06, based on the following findings and
subject to the following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Piannhg Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the
District Engineer determines that sewer senice is available, and building cannot
occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as they apply to sewer service for this project.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
Unified District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an .appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the General Plan.
The project provides affordable housing units that will be available to low income
households and the modification to the HiUside Standard for slope height would not
have a detrimental effect on public health, safety or welfare because the creation of
a 43 foot high manufactured fill slope that exceeds the 30 foot standard does not
pose a health and safety problem if the recommendations of the projects’s
PC RES0 NO 3593 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9.
10.
11.
....
geotechnical report are adhered to. The slope height standard of 30 feet is an aesthetic regulation intended to minimize impacts created by large
manufactured slopes. The overheight slope would be contour graded and
adequately landscaped to provide for visual screening, thus, offsetting any visual
impacts created by the additional 12 feet of slope height.
That the requested use is properly related to the site, surroundings and
environmental settings, is consistent with the various elements and objectives of the
general plan, will npt be detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically
permitted in the area in which the proposed use is to be located, and will not
adversely impact the site, surroundings or traffic circulation because the project is
consistent with the General Plan and Zone 20 Specific Plan. The project would not
have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed residential land uses
are compatible in scale, architecture, and building materials with the multi-family
residential development to the south the future community p&k to the west. Public
street improvements would be provided to accommodate traffic generated by the
project and the project must comply with all the circulation and public facility
requirements of Local Facilities Management Plan Zone 20.
That the site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
use because the project complies with all City ordinances and polices except for the
Hillside Ordinance's slope height standard as explained in Section C(2) of this
report, therefore, the parcel is adequate in size, shape and slope to accommodate
the proposed land uses.
That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features
necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the
neighborhood will be provided and maintained because the project would be
conditioned to provide a solid wall or fence, and landscaped windbreaks along the
perimeter of any future developable area that abuts property under "open field"
cultivation, in order to reduce public nuisance effects of adjacent pesticide spraying
and dust generation from farm operations and for the following reasons:
Area "BI' and "C' - Single-family Residential:
a. Standard R-1 Zone front, side and rear setbacks would be provided for each
home, and all homes would have at least a twocar garages to satisfy off-
street parking requirements.
b. The front yards of all the lots would be landscaped with a minimum of 3
street trees of Varying sizes, and the SO foot setback along Alga Road would
be landform graded and heavily landscaped.
PC RES0 NO 3593 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
12.
Area "A" and "D" - Multi-Family Residential And Community Facility Site:
a. The bulk and scale of the proposed two-story condominiums, townhouses,
and apartment buildings would be compatible With the existing and
surrounding residential development to the south. The proposed multi-family
townhomes would provide an appropriate transition between the proposed
single-family land use to the east and the future community park land use to
the west.
b. The design of the project would assure a unique mix of residential
development, and enhance the aesthetic quality of the area as follows:
1. The street setbacks would be landscaped with a combination of trees
and shrubs to partially screen the residential structures from the
public streets.
ii. The building elevations would have textured stucco exteriors and tile
and metal roofs, varied roof lines, architectural accent features and
building forms, and varied building facades.
iii. The dwelling units would be orientated at various angles along the
driveways to provide an enclosure of space between the buildings and
to provide more visual interest when the project is viewed from the
public meets.
That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all
traffic generated by the proposed use for the following reasons:
Area "B" and "C' - Single-Family Residential:
All the local, collector, and major streets, both within and offsite of this project
would be constructed to City standards, have underground utilities, and contain
public sidewalks. A pedestrian access is provided between Lots 47 and 48 in Area
"C" to allow access to future Hidden Valley Road and Poinsettia Community Park.
Area "A" and "D" - Multi-Family Residential And Community Facility Site:
a. The project would provide adequate onsite parking (498 parking spaces) and
circulation to serve the needs of the residents and their guests, and it would
not impact the availability of offsite street parking.
b. Sidewalks and drainage facilities would be provided along the project's street
frontages to serve the project.
PC RES0 NO 3593 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
E
9
1c
11
12
1:
14
15
1C
17
1E
19
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
28
C.
d.
e.
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
....
....
....
The proposed 30 to 45 foot wide central private driveways would be
adequate to provide safe and efficient traffic circulation, vehicle turn
movements, and emergency access. The City's Parking Ordinance requires
a minimum standard width of 24 feet for a two-way traffic aisle containing
ninety degree parking on both sides. A 24 foot driveway aisle provides
adequate separation and distance for vehicles backing out of parking spaces
and adequate separation for two-way traffic (12 feet per travel lane).
An internal pedestrian circulation system that is separated from the
driveways within the multi-family projects would be provided and allow
sufficient and safe access to the recreation facility and adjacent public streets.
Adequate access for emergency vehicles is provided by the central 30 to 45
foot wide private driveways that service the multi-family projects. The 30
to 45 foot wide driveways are also wide enough to accommodate emergency
vehicles, and the project would be conditioned to prohibit parallel parking
along the 30 foot wide driveways. The project has been reviewed and
approved by the Fire Department.
All conditions of approval for CT 92-02 as contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3591 are applicable to this approval and incorporated through this
reference.
Approval for SDP 92-06, as shown on Exhibits "A" - ?"', dated December 15,
1993, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any
proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this approval as
determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this permit.
Approval of SDP 92-06 is subject to approval of CT 92-02, PUD 92-03, and HDP 92-
03.
The approval for the apartment portion of the Site Development Plan shall become
null. and void if building pennits are not issued for this portion of the project within
one year from the date of final map recordation creating Lot 133, unle& otherwise
stated in an approved affordable housing agreement for the site.
PC RES0 NO 3593 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
E
9
1c
11
1%
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 1Srh day of December, 1993,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
BAILEY NOBLE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO 3593 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
20
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 3594
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
APPROVAL OF A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO
DEVELOP 129 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, 76 TOWNHOMES, 72
CONDOMINIUM UNITS, 72 APARTMENT UNITS, AND TWO
FUTURE COMMUNITY FACILITY SITES, ALL ON PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF PASEO DEL NORTE, NORTH
OF CAMINO DE LAS ONDAS, SOUTH OF PALOMAR AIRPORT
ROAD IN LOCAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN ZONE 20.
CASE NAME: SAMBI
CASE NO: HDP 92-03
WHEREAS, a verified application has been filed with the Ciry of Carlsbad and
referred to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, said verified application constirutes a request as provided by Title
21 of rhe Cs..sbad Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission did, on the 15th day of December, 1993, consider said request on property
described as:
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter and the South 60 acres of
the North Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21, Township 12
South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, County of
San Diego, State of California, according to United States Government
Survey, approved October 25, 1875, according to the Official Plat
thereof.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, said Commission considered all
factors relating to HDP 92-03.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the Planning Commission
of the City of Carlsbad as follows:
A) That the foregoing recitations are true and correct.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B) That based on the evidence presented at the public hearing, the Commissicn
recommends APPROVAL of HDP 92-03, based on the following findings and subjec:
to the following conditions:
1.
2.
....
That hillside conditions and undevelopable areas of the project have been properly
identified because the site's hillside slope conditions and undevelopable areas have
been identified on a slope constraints exhibit.
That the development proposal and all applicable development approvals and
permits are consistent with the purpose, intent, and requirements of this chapter
and that the project design substantially conforms to the intent of the concepts
illustrated in the hillside development guidelines manual for the following reasons:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
All manufactured cut and fill slopes are landform/contou graded and do not
exceed a height of 30 feet, except for the 43 foot high slope along the
eastern portion of the apartment development in Area "A" per the Site
Development Plan.
The project's cut/iill grading volumes of 8,652 cubic yards per graded acre
falls within the "potentially acceptable range" of 8,000 - 10,000 cubic
yards/acre. tncluded in these volumes is 86,000 cubic yards of grading for
Alga Road which is a circulation element roadway. When grading for Alga
Road k subtracted out of the grading calculations, the project's grading
volumes are reduced to 7,773 cubic yards, per graded acre and are within the
"acceptable range".
Landscaping in conformance with the Zone 20 Specific Plan and the City's
Landscape Manual would be provided on all manufactured slopes to assist in
visually screening the slopes and to reduce erosion.
AU structures and roofs within the project would be earth tone in color to
reduce visual impacts.
A percentage of the homes along the north/south trending and gently sloping
ridgeline would be one-story in height and all homes would have varying
roof lines.
The multi-family residential buildings are setback from the top of
manufactured slopes horn a range of 15 to 60 feet, along the eastern portion
of Area "A".
PC RES0 NO. 3594 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
1c
31
12
12
14
It
1E
17
1E
1s
2c
21
22
22
24
25
26
27
2E
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
That no development or grading will occw in those portions of the property which
are undevelopable pursuant to the provisions of Section 21.53.230 of this code
because all undevelopable areas have been identified and except for Alga Road no
development or grading would occur in the areas containing 40%+ slopes. Grading
of 40% slopes would be necessary to construct portions of Alga Road. Areas where
circulation element roadways must be placed and no feasible alternatives consistent
with this chapter are available may bc excluded from the requirements of the
Hillside Development Regulations by the decision making body based on Section
21.95.090(b)(2) of the ordinance. The alignment of Alga Road in this area was
established with the approval of the tentative map for Cobblestone Sea Village (a
84-32). Analysis of alternatives For Alga Road indicated that due to constraints
from the SDG&E powerline easement that traverses through the main canyon there
is no feasible alternative consistent with the Hillside Development Regulations,
therefore, the Planning Commission excludes grading for Alga Road from the 40%
slope standard.
That the project design and lot configuration minimizes disturbance of hillside lands
because the proposed grading would create single-family building pads that are
terraced for views and step down the slope. A majority of the local streets and
manufactured slopes are curving and are aligned to follow the north/south trending
contours. The street alignments and curving landform graded slopes would reduce
visual impacts created by the grading and help simulate the natural slope conditions.
The project is consistent with all City public facility policies and ordinances since:
The Planning Commission has, by inclusion of an appropriate condition to this
project, ensured building permits will not be issued for the project unless the
District Engineer determines that sewer service is available, and building chnnot
occur within the project unless sewer service remains available, and the Planning
Commission is satisfied that the requirements of the Public Facilities Element of the
General Plan have been met insofar as rhey apply to sewer service for this project.
The applicant is by condition, required to pay any increase in public facility fee, or
new construction tax, or development fees, and has agreed to abide by any
additional requirements established by a Local Facilities Management Plan prepared
pursuant to Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. This .will ensure
continued availability of public facilities and will mitigate any cumulative impacts
created by the project.
This project is consistent with the City's Growth Management Ordinance as it has
been conditioned to comply with any requirement approved as part of the Local
Facilities Management Plan for Zone 20.
PC RES0 NO. 3594 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1c
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8.
9.
10.
11.
School fees will be paid to ensure the availability of school facilities in the Carlsbad
Unified District.
Park-in-lieu fees are required as a condition of approval.
All necessary public improvements have been provided or will be required as
conditions of approval.
The applicant has agreed and is required by the inclusion of an appropriate
condition to pay a public facilities fee. Performance of that contract and payment
of the fee will enable this body to find that public facilities will be available
concurrent with need as required by the general plan.
Conditions:
1.
2.
3.
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
....
All conditions of approval for (JT 92-02 as contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. 3591 are applicable to this approval and incorporated through this
reference.
Approval for HDP 92-03, as shown on Exhibits "A" - 'YYY", dated December 15,
1993, incorporated by reference and on file in the Planning Department.
Development shall occur substantially as shown on the approved exhibits. Any proposed grading and/or development substantially different from this approval as
determined by the Planning Director, shall require an amendment to this permit.
Approval of HDP 92-03 is subject to approval of CT 92-02, PUD 92-03, and SDP 92-
06, and the Conditional Negative Declaration.
PC RES0 NO. 3594 4
.1
:
5
L
I .
r
I
t
5
1(
13
1;
1:
14
1:
1E
17
1E
19
2c
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Carlsbad, California, held on the 15th day of December, 1993,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
BAILEY NOBLE, Chairperson
CARLSBAD PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
MICHAEL J. HOLZMILLER
PLANNING DIRECTOR
PC RES0 NO. 3594 5
4
1 I I
SAMBI CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/ I SOP 92-06/HDP 92-03
XCLOSURE ST.4EMENT
I
I
,?;ease Prim)
T?e following information must be disclosed:
1. Apdicant
List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application.
TO?OBARA AE91CA. Inc c/o nnv-ll!? & IGAfTWD
(D3A) Sunbelt ?lany?ina Co. 3q5.5 900s pvelt s t K1 9641 Firestoge 31vd :r SarlsSad, CA 329C8 Zoxney, CA 902ill P
2. Owner
bst the names and addresses of all persons having any ownership interest in the property involved
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names arc
addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any pannerscsz
interest in the PaftnershiD. Seizo 3. TOYOHARA; himenof &.Board 13355 Brookshire Ave
3o;mey, CA ?rJ241
Kinko K. TOVOXARA; Director, Secretary
Sane as above
Kazuyuki KAWAKITA; Director, President
11432 Hanover Ct., Cerritos, Ca. 90701
Sayoko AOYAGI; Treasurer -
16510 Stonehaven Ct. La Mirada, Ca. 90638
4 If any person idecrtMed pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names arc
addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profd organization or as trustee or beneficiar,
cf the trust.
*I 1
FRM00013 8/90
2075 Las Pa'vas Drive Carlsbad. California 920094859 (619) 438-1161
Disclosure Statement
'Over)
Page 2
5 rava you had more than 5250 wort3 of business ::ansacled wfh any member Of city staj :=:+:: Cammlssicns, CxnrniRees and Councll within the past twelve months?
Yes - NoXX - If yes. please indicate perscn(s)
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary.)
:iIROMICIII ~0~03.4m
Print or rype name of owner
FRMm13 8/90
BACKGROCND DhTA SHEET -
CASE NO: CT 92-02iPLD 92-03/SDP 92-06iHDP 92-03
CASE NAME: SAMBI
APPLICANT: TOYOHARA AMERICA
. REQUEST AND LOCATION: 129 Single-Family Lots, 76 Townhouse Units. 72 Condominium Units, 72
ADartment Units, & 2 Community Facilitv Lots
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The South Half of the Southeast Ouarter and the south 60 acres of the north
half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 21. Township 12 South, Range 4 West, San Bernadino Base and
Meridian. Countv of San Dieao. State of California, accordinn to United States Government Survey,
approved October 25, 1875, accordinn to the Official Plat thereof.
APN: 214-140-07 Acres 68.56 Proposed No. of Lots/Units 204 Lots & 144 Units
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
Land Use Designation Residential Medium & Residential Medium Low
Density Allowed 3.2 & 6 Dus/.Acre Density Proposed 5.8
Existing Zone RD-M-Q & R-1-10.000-0 Proposed Zone N/A
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements)
Zoning Land Use
Site RD-M-Q & R-1-10,000-0 Vacant
North RD-M-Q & R-1-10.000-0 Vacant
South RD-M-0 & R-1-10,000-0 Vacant
East LC Vacant
West PC Anriculture
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District Carlsbad Water District Carlsbad Sewer District Carlsbad
Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity) 353 EDU
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated Februarv 12, 1992
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
X Negative Declaration, issued Aunust 5. 1993
Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated
Other, JG.lh
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM
(To be Submitted with Development Application)
PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT:
FILE NAME AND NO: SAMBI - CT 92-02/PUD 92-03/SDP 92-06/HDP 92-03
LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE:&) GENERAL, PLAN: RM/RLM ZONING: RD-M-O/R-l-lO,OOO-O
DEVELOPER’S NAME: TOYOHARA AMERICA INC.
ADDRESS: 8641 Firestone Boulevard - Downey, CA 90241
PHONE NO: l213) 861-3808 ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NO: 214-140-07
QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): 68.56 Acres
ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: N/A
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
~ ~~~
A. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage =
0. Library: Demand in Square Footage =
C.
D. Park: Demand in Acreage =
E. Drainage: Demand in CFS =
Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer)
Identify Drainage Basin =
(Identify master plan facilities on site plan)
Circulation: Demand in ADTs =
(Identify Trip Distribution on site plan)
Fire:
Open Space: Acreage Provided -
Schools:
(Demands to be determined by staff)
Sewer: Demand in EDUs -
Served by Fire Station No. =
Identify Sub Basin -
(Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan)
K.
L.
1,213.4 sq. ft.
647.1 sa. ft.
N/A
2.42
N/A
N/A
3.650
No. 4
9.03
N/A
- 353
N/A
77,660 Water: Demand in GPD -
The project is 36.83 units above the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance.JG.’h
r iz
.
.-
-
.
I
C a 6 E
u"
:
8 U C&
04
cn
e-
@
C 0
.-
CI k 3
V i
EI
:
I
I !
I*
:
-
,
-
+
.b
.-
,
-
i!
ji
1 I I I
.1
I
_.
i
I
.,
.
.
'
..
.
,
.-
.
-
-
,-
c 0 I > u
.-
-
Gi
e 0 0 V
cn
.-
w x 3
,
i i i
I
i
I
-- I
I
I I
E: a h
E s'
-I-
-
. .
G ..
:j
I I
I
-
- . .
. . .
-.
. .
p.
I
I
-.
-
--
1
I
t
I !
I...
.
I
..
.
.
.
.
i
-_
__
i
--
-
f-
c
-
-.
-
--