HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-11-06; Traffic Safety and Mobility Commission; ; El Camino Real Roadway Improvements from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive, Capital Improvement Program Project No. 6094Meeting Date: Nov. 6, 2023
To: Traffic Safety & Mobility Commission
Staff Contact: Brandon Miles, Associate Engineer
brandon.miles@carlsbadca.gov, 442-339-2745
Subject: El Camino Real Roadway Improvements from Sunny Creek Road to
Jackspar Drive, Capital Improvement Program Project No. 6094
Recommended Action
Support staff’s recommendation to the City Council to approve the plans and specifications for
the El Camino Real Roadway Improvements from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive, Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) Project No. 6094.
Background
El Camino Real is an arterial street that functions as a primary north-south connection
throughout the city. The posted speed limit is 55 miles per hour with average daily traffic
volumes of approximately 32,000 vehicles per day. Bike lanes are provided in both directions.
Sidewalks are currently provided on the west side of the roadway; however, no sidewalk is
present on the east side of the roadway between Jackspar Drive to approximately 150 feet
south of Sunny Creek Road. The subject portion of El Camino Real between Sunny Creek Road
and Jackspar Drive is a five-lane roadway consisting of three travel lanes in the southbound
direction and two travel lanes in the northbound direction. The adjoining segments of El
Camino Real to the north and south of the project area are built out to the ultimate six lane
arterial street standard.
The project will widen the northbound segment of El Camino Real for approximately 1,600 feet
from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive consistent with the Mobility Element of the city’s
General Plan. The improvements will result in a total of three 11-foot-wide vehicle lanes, an 8-
foot bike lane, a 3-foot buffer and a new noncontiguous sidewalk varying from 5 to 6 feet wide
to accommodate a biofiltration system for stormwater treatment along the northbound side of
the roadway. Currently, the sidewalk terminates in the northbound direction just south of
Sunny Creek Road. The buffered bike lanes will include green dashed paint in the bicycle-vehicle
conflict zone as shown in Exhibit 2. A total of three new streetlights will be added for safety on
the east side of El Camino Real withing the project area. In addition, the intersection at Jackspar
Drive will include continental style crosswalks with upgraded pedestrian ramps meeting the
Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA, requirements.
On Sept. 7, 2021, the Traffic &Mobility Commission unanimously supported staff’s
recommendation to implement the project as it provided operational improvements consistent
with the city’s General Plan Mobility Element. The approved minutes of this meeting are
attached as Exhibit 3.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 1 of 83
On Oct. 3, 2022, the Traffic & Mobility Commission unanimously supported recommendation to
approve the plans and specifications including the exceptions noted below of the El Camino
Real Roadway Improvements from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive, Capital Improvement
Program, or CIP, Project No. 6094. The approved minutes of this meeting are attached as
Exhibit 4.
On May 3, 2023, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending approval of the
project permits and waive the open space for the El Camino Real Roadway Improvements from
Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive, Capital Improvement Program, or CIP, Project No. 6094.
The approved minutes of this meeting are attached as Exhibit 5.
On Sept. 26, 2023, the City Council unanimously supported a recommendation to approve the
project permits and waive the open space for the El Camino Real Roadway Improvements from
Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive, Capital Improvement Program, or CIP, Project No. 6094.
The draft minutes of this meeting are attached as Exhibit 6.
Next Steps
Following the Traffic Safety & Mobility Commission’s review, staff will finalize the project plans
and will bring a staff report to the City Council in early 2024 with a recommendation to approve
the plans, specifications and contract documents, and authorize the City Clerk to advertise for
construction bids for the project.
After the bidding process is complete, staff will return to the City Council with a request to
award a construction contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. The
construction is targeted to start in mid-2024, with completion expected in mid-2025.
Exhibits
1. Location map
2. Improvement plans for ECR Widening from Sunny Creek to Jackspar Drive
3. Approved Meeting Minutes of the Traffic & Mobility Commission on Sept. 7, 2021
4. Approved Meeting Minutes of the Traffic & Mobility Commission on Oct. 3, 2022
5. Approved Meeting Minutes of the Planning Commission on May 3, 2023
6. Draft Meeting Minutes of the City Council on Sept. 26, 2023
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 2 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
JAC
K
S
P
A
R
D
R
REE
F
C
R
SU
N
N
Y
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
LONGFELLOW R
D
FOR
E
C
A
S
T
L
E
C
T
DON MI
G
U
E
L
D
R
FROST AV
CAM
I
N
O
H
I
L
L
S
D
R
KEATS
P
L
DON
Q
U
I
X
O
T
E
D
R
DON
T
O
M
A
S
O
D
R
RAN
C
H
O
C
A
R
L
S
B
A
D
D
R
BYRON
P
L
PLOT DATE: 6/16/2021 PATH: S:\EngGIS\Madison_Power\Location maps\El Camino Real Widening- Sunny Creek road to Jackspar.mxd
PROJECT NAME EXHIBITPROJECTNUMBER60941EL CAMINO REAL WIDENING FROM SUNNY CREEK ROAD TO JACKSPAR DRIVE
LOCATION MAP
CARLSBAD
VISTA
OCEANSIDE
ENCINITAS
SAN MARCOS
Vicinity Map ³
PLOTTED BY: MPower
SITE
SITE
³NOT TO SCALE
Exhibit 1
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 3 of 83
PROJECT
LOCATION
EL CAMINO REAL
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLANS
FROM SUNNY CREEK ROAD TO JACKSPAR DRIVE
PROJECT NO. 6094
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL
KEITH BLACKBURN - MAYOR
PRIYA BHAT-PATEL - MAYOR PRO TEM
TERESA ACOSTA - COUNCIL MEMBER
MELANIE BURKHOLDER - COUNCIL MEMBER
CAROLYN LUNA - COUNCIL MEMBER
SCOTT CHADWICK - CITY MANAGER
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Exhibit 2
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 4 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 5 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 6 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
APN 209-060-58-00
APN 209-060-53-00
APN 212-160-31-00
APN 209-090-11-00APN 209-060-48-00
APN
163-050-43
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 7 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
APN 209-060-58-00
APN 209-060-53-00
APN 212-160-31-00
APN
163-050-43
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 8 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
APN 209-090-11-00
APN 209-060-48-00
APN 212-160-31-00 APN 212-102-75-00
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 9 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 10 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 11 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 12 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 13 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 14 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 15 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 16 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
APN 209-060-58-00
APN 209-060-53-00
APN 212-160-31-00
APN 163-050-43
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 17 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
APN 209-090-11-00
APN 209-060-48-00
APN 212-160-31-00 APN 212-102-75-00
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 18 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 19 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 20 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 21 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 22 of 83
AH
E
A
D
AH
E
A
D
SI
G
N
A
L
SIG
N
A
L
AH
E
A
D
SIG
N
A
L
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Sunny Creek
SPEED
LIMIT
55
Rd 2800
OPEN TO
THE PUBLIC
MUST
RIGHT LANE
TURN RIGHT
EXCEPT
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 23 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 24 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
ROAD WORK
END
WORK
AHEAD
ROAD SIDEWALK CLOSED
CROSS HERE
LANE
CLOSED CLOSED
BIKE LANE
MAY USE
FULL LANE
BIKE
AHEAD
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 25 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
WORKCLOSEDCLOSED
CLOSED
SHOULDER
M P H
SIDEWALK CLOSED
AHEAD
CROSS HERE
LANE
CLOSED CLOSED
BIKE LANEROAD
AHEAD
SHOULDERSHOULDER
RIGHT
AHEAD
SIDEWALK
NO
45
BIKE
AHEAD
SIDEWALK CLOSED
CROSS HERE
SIDEWALK CLOSED
USE OTHER SIDE
MAY USE
FULL LANE
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 26 of 83
AH
E
A
D
AH
E
A
D
SI
G
N
A
L
SIG
N
A
L
AH
E
A
D
SIG
N
A
L
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 27 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 28 of 83
AH
E
A
D
AH
E
A
D
SI
G
N
A
L
SI
G
N
A
L
AH
E
A
D
SI
G
N
A
L
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
TRAFFIC SIGNAL NOTES
CONSTRUCTION NOTES
LEFT TURN
YIELD
ON GREEN
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 29 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 30 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 31 of 83
EL
C
A
M
I
N
O
R
E
A
L
R
O
A
D
W
A
Y
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
S
-
1
0
0
%
P
S
&
E
S
U
B
M
I
T
T
A
L
(
1
0
/
1
6
/
2
0
2
3
)
811
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 32 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 33 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 34 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 35 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 36 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 37 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 38 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 39 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 40 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 41 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 42 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 43 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 44 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 45 of 83
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 46 of 83
Council Chambers
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Tuesday, Sept. 7, 2021, 4 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Gocan called the Meeting to order at 4:04 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present: Gocan, Perez, Penseyres, Linke and Coelho
Absent: Fowler
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Vice-Chair Perez led the Pledge of Allegiance
This meeting was conducted virtually via Zoom due to the stay-at-home order for COVID-19.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Motion by Vice-Chair Perez, seconded by Commissioner Penseyres to approve the minutes for the Aug.
2, 2021 meeting.
Motion carried: 4/0/1/1 (Abstained: Coelho; Absent: Fowler)
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA: None
CONSENT CALENDAR:
1.EL CAMINO REAL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS FROM SUNNY CREEK ROAD TO JACKSPAR DRIVE,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 6094 - Support staff’s recommendation to
implement the El Camino Real Roadway Improvements from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive,
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Project No. 6094 (Project) providing operational improvements
consistent with the city’s General Plan Mobility Element.
This item was pulled for discussion by Vice-Chair Perez
2.SHARED LANE MARKINGS ON LEVANTE STREET FROM SEGOVIA WAY TO LA COSTA AVENUE- Support
staff’s recommendation to install shared lane markings on Levante Street from Segovia Way to La
Costa Avenue
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM 2:
David Levin - Members of the Traffic and Mobility Commission: Having shared lane markings and other
appropriate signage alerting drivers to share the road for the sake of all bicyclists’ safety on Levante
Street will be greatly appreciated by all bicyclists who navigate the narrowness of this street, especially
when parked cars and trucks are present. I am very appreciative that Council Member Teresa Acosta,
City Traffic Engineer John Kim, Associate Engineer Lindy Pham, and everyone on their teams who
conducted the study found that there is indeed a need to improve Levante Street for all bicyclists.
And I’m pleased that the Carlsbad Traffic and Mobility Commission will be hearing the
recommendation. However, I am a bit disappointed that the recommended starting point for the
Exhibit 3
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 47 of 83
sharrows and related signage will be only between Segovia Way and La Costa Avenue on Levante
Street. There needs to be more territory covered on Levante Street.
The width from one side of Levante Street to the other side, starting from Escenico Terrace to Segovia
Way appears to be similar to what the engineers are recommending for shared lane markings on
Levante Street from Segovia to La Costa Avenue, especially with parked vehicles.
In other words, the installation of sharrows and other appropriate signage should be expanded on
Levante Street from Escenico Terrace to La Costa Avenue—not just Segovia Way to La Costa
Avenue. That shortcoming would not lend itself to bicycle safety to all the areas needed on Levante
Street.
Without delay to deciding on the engineers’ recommendation, it is my hope that the Traffic and Mobility
Commission will request another look at an extended placement shared lane markings and other
appropriate signage from Escenico Terrace to La Costa.
Thank you very much.
DISCUSSION:
City Traffic Engineer Kim stated that it is not common practice for engineers to consider sharrows on
residential streets that are posted at 25 miles per hour. The speeds are low enough that sharrows are
typically not necessary. However, since a portion of Levante Street is defined as a school street per the
Mobility Element, staff has recommended the installation of sharrows upon the portion of Levante
Street that is defined as a school street. Staff is willing to hear the commission’s recommendation on
expanding the area of sharrow installation per Mr. Levin’s comment.
Commissioner Penseyres asked the distance referenced in the residents’ request.
City Traffic Engineer Kim said it is over 10 intersections and about 5,000 extra feet, and relatively flat.
Commissioner Linke is familiar with the street, acknowledges that this is just not a regular street, but a
thoroughfare, however he supports the staff’s recommendation and can consider other sections in the
future.
Vice-Chair Perez mentioned that the section going west has a bit of a slope and possible blind section,
but is in agreement with staff’s recommendation at this time to try it out.
Chair Gocan and commissioners agreed that the resident has a concern, yet they will try it out and they
will move forward.
ACTION:
Motion by Commissioner Linke, seconded by Commissioner Penseyres to approve Consent Calendar
Item 2 - Shared Lane Markings on Levante Street from Segovia Way to La Costa Avenue, as presented.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler)
Motion by Commissioner Linke, seconded by Vice-Chair Perez to approve Consent Calendar Item 1- El
Camino Real Roadway Improvements from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive, Capital Improvement
Program Project No. 6094, as presented.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler)
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS:
3. POLICE MONTHLY REPORT – (Staff Contact: Corporal Matt Bowen, Police Department)
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 48 of 83
Corporal Bowen presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office
of the City Clerk)
DISCUSSION:
Corporal Bowen pointed out that Carlsbad schools opened up on August 24, and the motors were at the
schools both morning and afternoons to help with any traffic issues and to keep the kids safe, in
addition to the crossing guards.
Corporal Bowen highlighted the purchase of an Electronic Message Board that is displayed on Carlsbad
Boulevard with the following message “Loud Exhaust Enforced Ahead”.
Commissioner Penseyres and Vice-Chair Perez are interested in hearing about the Know Your Limit
program related to driving under the in fluence at the next meeting.
4. ALL-WAY STOP ON CEREZO DRIVE AT LOS ROBLES DRIVE AND EL ARBOL DRIVE – (Staff Contact: Lindy
Pham and John Kim, Public Works)
Staff’s Recommendation: Support staff’s recommendation to install an all-way stop at Cerezo
Drive and Los Robles Drive.
Associate Engineer Pham presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the
Office of the City Clerk).
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM 4:
Jonnie Johnson - Thank you for work to resolve traffic problems in Terramar. It is much appreciated.
However, there are two issues that need further attention.
1. The most critical is the lack of red curbs/no parking signs on the western most portion of
Cerezo. The curbs are painted red on the southern side of the street between Carlsbad Blvd and
Los Robles, except for 2-3 parking spaces. The report states Cerezo is 36’ wide. It is, in some
portions. However, the street is tapered hence the western portion is narrower, approximately
33’ wide, leaving 16’ per lane. Per CA DOT, car widths are normally 6-8’ wide making
parking/driving tight. Cerezo is the primary entrance to Terramar. It is also a popular parking
spot for beachgoers. Surfers bring surfboards. adding another factor (one that is not addressed
in the current Residential Traffic Calming Program) to the traffic problem. They lay their boards
in the street reducing the passage even more. In addition, the owner of the house located on
southwest corner Cerezo/Carlsbad Blvd. has laid several large boulders on the easement,
causing pedestrians to walk in the street. (see attached photos.) This situation presents a
potential liability problem for the City if a pedestrian is hit, because of the boulders. The
intersection at Carlsbad Blvd/Cerezo has one pedestrian crosswalk located at the south side, so
it makes sense that westbound pedestrians on Cerezo be directed to the southern crosswalk on
the Blvd. Highly recommend the south side of the street between Carlsbad Blvd/Los Robles be
painted red.
2. Page 2, 2nd para. “Removal of on-street parking MAY not be supported by the Coastal
Commission…” This is ironic, since the next street over, Manzano, has NO parking on either side
and it is a blocked off from Carlsbad Blvd traffic.
DISCUSSION:
City Traffic Engineer Kim commented on the pedestrian concerns brought up by Ms. Johnson and
offered that a new sidewalk, which will be analyzed by the Transportation Department. The removal of
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 49 of 83
parking would create more space, but it may also lead to other concerns as people would simply park
further into the neighborhood. The removal of the parking spaces would create a wider street, which
may also increase vehicle speeds. Based on these considerations, the appropriate recommendation is to
install the all-way stop at Cerezo Drive and Las Robles Drive.
Chair Gocan asked and it was confirmed that staff will analyze the feasibility of a sidewalk in the future.
Commissioner Penseyres inquired about the location of the boulders in relation to the right of away.
City Traffic Engineer Kim said that they will look into it since they just received this comment over the
weekend.
Transportation Director Frank mentioned that similar to other streets, there are private encroachments
with landscaping, rocks, and boulders in the right of way. Staff has looked into this but have not reached
out to the involved property owners to discuss options.
Commissioner Penseyres asked about the speed survey, have we considered putting out rubber tubes to
catch the speeders when no one is there watching them. The concern is the maximum speed not the
critical speed.
City Traffic Engineer Kim replied that there is no accepted standard or practice that considers maximum
speed as a design factor and that critical speed is the appropriate measure. Maximum speeds are
captured since the speed measurement device records on a 24-hour per day basis.
Commissioner Linke asked about the no parking signs and the barricade on Manzano Drive.
City Traffic Engineer Kim will research the installation date as well as the justification for designating a
no parking zone.
Transportation Director Frank said that if staff decided to consider a sidewalk as a part of the sidewalk
improvement program, staff would hold workshops with the neighbors to explore different
opportunities.
Vice-Chair Perez inquired about the timing of the speed feedback sign deployment and a work-from-
home philosophy.
Associate Engineer Pham said that they did consider the lower volume of traffic during a pandemic. The
volume of the traffic was 118 and the minimum to qualify for consideration is 300 vehicles per hour per
the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Staff was confident that “normal” traffic levels would
not reach the minimum levels
City Traffic Engineer Kim mentioned that volume of traffic around the beaches has been fairly high
during the pandemic. Staff looked at the eight specific recommendations or guidance factors. The
location did not meet the criteria for vehicle volume, but it did meet the criteria for the
vehicle/pedestrian conflicts, which is why they are recommending the stop sign at that intersection.
Commissioner Penseyres inquired if there are any future projects that will be adding parking?
Transportation Engineering Manager Ajideh said that the Terramar project will improve Carlsbad
Boulevard including some parking improvements. The Terramar project is still in the environmental
review process and staff will bring it to the commission when it is appropriate.
Commissioner Linke likes the suggestion of looking at sidewalks and would appreciate a more global
picture of all the parking and safety issues. Motion by Commissioner Linke, seconded by Commissioner Penseyres to support staff’s recommendations to install All-Way STOP control on Cerezo Drive at Los Robles Drive and El Arbol Drive.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler)
5. VILLAGE AND BARRIO INTERSECTION CONTROL AT OAK AVENUE AND ROOSEVELT STREET- (Staff
Contact: Hossein Ajideh, Public Works)
Staff’s Recommendation: Support staff’s recommendation
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 50 of 83
Transportation Engineering Manager Ajideh presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint
presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM 5:
Xylina Lim - Buddha Teas has operated out of our current facilities on Tyler Street for close to ten years.
As a tea company, we receive large shipments of herbs and dried goods. While we encourage the efforts
of creating a safer area by controlling the flow of traffic, the proposed traffic circles inhibit larger
vehicles to enter our facilities. We will be one of many local businesses impacted by this change as we
have personally witnessed larger truck deliveries in the area that squeeze into smaller spaces than ours.
This feat alone takes a very skilled driver; the introduction of roundabouts will prevent trucks to have
any access to our facilities in the current proposed locations. As safety is at the forefront of our worries,
Buddha Teas would like to offer an alternative solution -- stop signs or speed bumps. We agree that the
driving speed observed is sometimes far beyond the speed limits. Stop signs will allow drivers to fully
stop and take in their surroundings for pedestrians and small creatures. In addition, speed bumps still
allow traffic movement, just at a more reasonable speed. In conclusion, the traffic circles would result in
a very detrimental loss for local businesses like ours. It is imperative for local businesses to receive
shipments at all, no matter the size.
DISCUSSION:
Commissioner Linke asked if corner bulb outs are an option for this location.
Transportation Engineering Manager Ajideh said that they did not introduce the bulb outs because they
heard the Boys and Girls Club concerns and they were trying to gain a few parking spaces. The four-way
stop is the safest condition for pedestrians.
Commissioner Penseyres asked if a scramble type crosswalk is possible?
Consultant Capuzzi said that he has not seen scrambles at all-way stops. They are typically used at traffic
signals.
Transportation Director Frank agreed that he has not seen a scramble at an all-way stop, it is probably
not a viable option.
Commissioner Coelho asked why we originally looked at a traffic circle at this location.
Transportation Engineering Manager Ajideh said that during the design stage, they noticed that there
were concerns for this specific intersection.
Deputy City Manager Gomez mentioned that during the Village and Barrio Master Plan development
there was a lot of public outreach. As the ideas came forward, they were presented and vetted. They
took the information included in the Village and Barrio Master Plan as a starting point and had the
consultants help them develop the plans and specifications. After speaking with the local businesses,
and particularly the Boys and Girls Club, there were some concerns and changes from what was
previously approved by City Council and had been presented to the Traffic and Mobility Commission.
Motion by Commissioner Coelho, seconded by Commissioner Linke to support staff’s recommendation
for alternative intersection control feature (no-project alternative with adding continental crosswalks) at
Oak Avenue and Roosevelt Street, which is part of the Village and Barrio Traffic Circles, Capital
Improvement Program Project, or CIP, No. 4015.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler)
6. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) PROGRAM AND TDM HANDBOOK – (Staff Contact: Tom Frank, Public Works) Staff’s Recommendation: Receive a presentation and provide input
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 51 of 83
Transportation Director/City Engineer Frank presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint
presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEM 6:
1. Diane Nygaard - Honorable Chair and Commissioners: We were very disappointed after reading the
staff report for this agenda item. Our expectation was that a status report would actually report on
results. Understanding results is critical to determining what changes are needed in the program.
This report unfortunately does not discuss that.
What, if any, impact has this program had on increasing the mode share for alternative
transportation? How many businesses are participating? Have they completed baseline
surveys? How many have completed follow up surveys- and do they show any increase in mode
share for alternative transportation? What has been their experience with use of the actions from
the checklist and how does that inform decisions about modifying the TDM Ordinance/Handbook
for the next update?
We will separately forward to you and staff a discussion prepared by our attorney on the
inadequacies of the existing TDM program. We recognize the city's position is that they are in
compliance with the conditions of our settlement agreement related to the TDM program. But the
concerns raised in that letter are all relevant for your consideration of what needs to be improved if
this program is to achieve a meaningful reduction in GHG.
Today as we see the devastating impacts of climate change around our country and the world,
taking this issue seriously is imperative.
Thank you for providing important oversight and direction to staff.
2. Mike Bullock- We should all be serious about TDM, for 5 reasons:
1.) Cars are by far the category of GHG emission that emits the most GHG (CO2)
2.) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) recently reported that humanity has a
“Code Red” climate emergency
3.) The IPCC says this because humanity is on a path to result in climate destabilization, which is
likely to end most life forms on Earth, including our own species
4.) There are two climate “targets”, or requirements, that must be achieved, to avoid climate
destabilization or, put another way, must be achieved to stabilize the earth’s climate at a livable
level
a. The 2nd requirement is to achieve net-zero emissions by 2045 or, if we are lucky, we
might be able to slip that out to 2050
b. The first requirement (which is the most important one, because if we fail to achieve the
first requirement, achieving the later requirement won’t save us) is to emit at a level
that is no more than 80% below what we emitted in 1990, by 2030, as part of an overall
world-wide plan to get our earth’s atmospheric CO2 to stop going up. (Note that
atmospheric CO2 is now around 420 PPM, but it should be around 280 PPM. 350 PPM
was deemed to be “dangerous” over 10 years ago.)
5.) The 2030 requirement can’t be achieved by only electrifying our fleet; we must reduce
driving. (I have done the math and verified this to be true.)
It seems to me that if Carlsbad were serious about TDM, then it would develop and implement a good
TDM program for their own employees, to show the employers in Carlsbad how it is done. Once the
Carlsbad TDM is “successful”, meaning that it is favored by most Carlsbad employees and it reduces
driving as predicted, other companies in Carlsbad could be required to adopt the same TDM.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 52 of 83
Since we need big reductions by 2030, we must rely on pricing. Complete streets, better transit, and
better zoning need to happen ASAP, but their GHG reductions will not happen fast enough or be large
enough, given the 2030 requirement of emitting at no more than 80% below what was emitted in 1990.
We need systems to improve the way drivers pay for the use of roads and transit. The Road Use Charge
(RUC) is a state function. Carlsbad needs to ask California to implement a good RUC system in time to
help achieve the 2030 target. (ASAP!) Parking policy reform is for the municipalities. And Steve, you are
correct. TDM needs to be for all types of development.
I am a retired satellite system engineer. This is a systems-engineering problem. I have worked the
problem of identifying a set of enforceable measures to ensure that cars will achieve the 2030 target. It
has been presented multiple times, at Air and Waste Management Association (AWMA)
conferences. Each time the paper was presented, it was peer reviewed. The 2nd attached file is the
paper; the 3rd file is the power point file I use to present the paper.
DISCUSSION:
Chair Gocan is working with the school district, the city, and hopefully the community to make sure that
bikes have safe access through the intersections. Her personal goal is that 20% to 30% of the students,
especially high school student use walking or biking to go to school and create a safe place for drop off
and pick up of students.
Commissioner Linke would like to highlight four different regulatory pathways. Specifically, Mobility Plan
items 3P-8 to 3P-11. The items are:
1. TDM Ordinance and Handbook focusing on reducing employment related vehicle trips not only on
larger new businesses.
2. Having developers pay their fair share when they are adding traffic to the streets and congestion and
are failing to meet our GMP standard.
3. Our multi-modal level of service point system to achieve the minimum GMP standard to improve
nonvehicle modes of travel which he is on the ad hoc committee, because the standard is way too low.
He wants to include definitions of different TDM approaches to help the point system.
4. A state mandated environmental review of CEQA to reduce vehicle miles traveled. He is
recommending that these four regulatory pathways to be handled in the revision of the TDM Handbook.
Transportation Director Frank appreciates the timely comments and staff will be looking at what steps
are needed to update TDM to best serve our program goals.
Commissioner Linke gave examples and suggestions on how to update the TDM handbook, specifically
section 1.7 to include more than just the employees, to include all patrons of the business. In section 2.2
the thresholds of compliance, needs to address the trips that are added to exempt streets at a higher
standard. In section 2.5 the tier levels themselves and how they are applied from a Tier 1 to a Tier 2 or
Tier 3. The strategy needs to be beefed up to adequately address the trips to the site and determine if
the measures are working. He is suggesting that the survey be done every year for the first few years to
make sure they are properly monitored.
Commissioner Linke suggested that staff confirm that the TDM programs have been implemented and
the actual performance of those programs.
Consultant Hester agreed this is a really good comment and concern. The goal is to find out how many
people are participating in the program on the commercial side.
Transportation Director Frank said that on the residential projects we don’t have the same options or
tools to reinforce them. Staff will look into what options they have for residential projects based on all
the comments they receive. COVID-19 has made it difficult to complete the monitoring of the TDM
program.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 53 of 83
Chair Gocan asked if it is ever going to be possible for the traffic and transportation engineers to review
the TDM applications.
Consultant Hester said that they will be looking at the process along with the content.
Transportation Director Frank said that the Community Development Team uses the handbook as a part
of their review. All of these examples are going to help improve this new TDM program. Commissioner
Linke mentioned that the City, when it updated the General Plan in 2014, discussed TDM.
Commissioner Linke would like staff to review the Innovative Feature category. Also review the
definition of how projects get the number of points they receive in every category.
Commissioner Coelho inquired about who has the lead in approving the TDM plans and the roles of the
different groups that participate in the process.
Deputy City Manager Gomez said that the Traffic and Mobility Commission does not review the TDM
Plans for private development projects. It is in the commission purview to look at and provide input on
how we can improve our processes and things that are related to traffic and mobility.
Transportation Director Frank said that he, as the City Engineer has the authority to make the changes.
Staff likes to work in a transparent manner to bring forward updates and receive suggestions like we are
doing tonight. Staff is currently providing Traffic Impact Analysis reviews for all projects, including
Community Development projects.
Chair Gocan mentioned that transportation options, like e-bikes, have changed a lot over the years. The
city is also seeing more traffic on the roads and the Traffic and Mobility Commission cannot address all
the associated tasks to reduce this traffic.
Transportation Director Frank agreed, and said it is getting more challenging with the state laws coming
out about higher densities. His challenges as the Transportation Director is to inform the policy makers,
the commission, the City Council, and the public of the coming issues and how we are going to address
it. The roads are congested, we cannot eliminate congestion, we can improve the efficiency of the road
network. Staff acknowledge that transportation behavioral changes are difficult because people like to
go from point A to B in a timely and convenient manner.
Commissioner Penseyres recommends that with the TDM program we could use a positive approach like
employers offering an easy access for bicyclist to a private shower with lockers and towel racks. The bike
parking should be close to the showers and lockers. We should be very specific about the amenities that
we provide for cycling to work. There are places in the TDM options that say should, when shall do this
to get the points, is more appropriate. When talking about bike racks it says if practicable then include
on your drawings. If it’s not practicable and they you are not going to do it, we need to make the
wording tougher so that they do it. We need to be a lot more specific on what a good faith effort gets
them before they can collect the points. Everything we do evolves around the automobile, like
rewarding an employee with a car and/or a premium parking spot. We have to do a paradigm shift and
we will need a lot of perks to change behavior. We need to provide very specific things in the TDM
program to encourage people to take another look at what else they can do. Finally, we need to place
more importance on education. For example, e-bike education helps the kids understand the rules of
the road to get to where they need to go, like to the beach with their surf boards, this saves the parents
time and car trips.
Vice-Chair Perez agreed that e-bikes are the new way we are going to be moving into the bicycle
industry, one of our transportation innovations. We should try to be innovative in the city and provide
some kind of charging. The e-bikes are heavy and might not fit in an office. The e-bikes might need a
charge to make the return trip home. Education and safety have to be a really crucial point in the
handbook, items like helmets and the importance of being seen by the cars. In the handbook when it
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 54 of 83
lists bike safety incentive the cost is medium, but the effectiveness is low. We need to place more
importance on providing helmet safety and being visible to the cars.
Chair Gocan mentioned the benefit of having e-bike chargers in the village as well as at the schools. To
make the bicycle riders, safe, comfortable, and provide a convenient place to charge.
Staff will consider all the suggestions to make the behavior change more rewarding.
7. ELECT A NEW TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR – (Staff Contact: John Kim, Public Works)
Staff’s Recommendation: Elect a new T&MC Chair and Vice-Chair
Motion by Commissioner Penseyres, seconded by Commissioner Coelho to nominate Commissioner Perez to one-year term as Chair and to nominate Commissioner Linke to 1-year term as Vice-Chair.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler) CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER REPORT: City Traffic Engineer Kim noted that staff had received comments regarding VMT from Commissioner Linke and would be bringing VMT as an agenda item in the near future. City Traffic Engineer Comments: Attachment A TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Motion by Commissioner Penseyres, seconded by Vice-chair Perez to put in the agenda for the next
meeting to return to 3 p.m. T&MC meetings for as long as it continues to be virtual meetings.
Motion carried: 5/0/0/1 (Absent: Fowler)
Commissioner Penseyres inquired about the 2017 bicyclist crash in 2017 listed in the staff report near
Levante and Anillo Way. Staff will look at the location to evaluate the potential conflict point and if
needed, propose a potential solution.
Vice-Chair Perez gave a compliment to staff on the improvements at College Ave and El Camino Real, for
bicyclists, as a bicyclist at that intersection. He asked and will email staff about the new park at the
reservoir and the potential line of sight over the hill if that can be reviewed. He has received comments
from the neighborhood near Sage Creek High School about the new drop off location and the back-up it
is causing on the roadway.
Commissioner Linke gave several compliments to all aspects of the meeting, including the commission
and public comments. He inquired about the Vehicle Miles Traveled analysis guidelines change. It would
be nice for the commission to see the one major revision as listed in the report as a separate topic as
soon as possible. Consider treating the TDM guidelines as a living document in the same manner as the
Vehicle Miles Traveled analysis guidelines and consider making some changes immediately to improve
the situation while we are looking at updates to the TDM handbook.
Commissioner Coelho appreciates everyone’s efforts at this meeting and looks forward to working with
all of them.
Chair Gocan has been working with Sage Creek and the district about e-bikes. On Carlsbad Village Drive
at College Boulevard, the right turn is wide, the cars move over and the bikes are trying to get around.
She recommends staff to pay attention to that and also noticed parents are parking at the bus stop and
blocking the location for bikes.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 55 of 83
Chair Gocan announced her resignation from the Traffic and Mobility Commission.
Transportation Director Frank thanked Chair Gocan for her service, her advocacy for school bike safety
that can continue into the future, and most importantly, Happy Birthday!
ADJOURNMENT:
Chair Gocan adjourned the Traffic and Mobility Commission Meeting on Sept. 7, 2021, at 7:35 p.m.
___________________________ Eliane Paiva, Minutes Clerk
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 56 of 83
Council Chambers
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Oct. 3, 2022, 4:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER: 4:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Perez, Linke, Penseyres, Fowler, Coelho and Proulx
Absent: Newlands
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Chair Perez led the Pledge of Allegiance
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes of the Special Meeting held Aug. 18, 2022.
Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Proulx to approve the minutes of Aug. 18, 2022,
meeting as presented. Motion carried, 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Commissioner Newlands)
Minutes of the Regular Meeting held Sept. 6, 2022.
Motion by Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Proulx to approve the minutes of Aug. 18, 2022,
meeting as amended. Motion carried, 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Commissioner Newlands)
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Tim Morgan spoke about the intersection of Tamarack Avenue and Valley Street and its Phase II of the
Traffic Calming Study. There was a lack of engagement and community involvement, and the HAWK signal
is putting our community / neighbors in a dangerous situation.
Rod Hafeti spoke about speeding around Snug Harbor. The average speed limit noted during the study
was over 40-mph in a 25-mph zone. He asked the Commission to consider traffic calming measures.
Brian Connor spoke about being proactive and requiring that the residents park their cars in the garage.
Residents continue to leave many vehicles on the street, and this causes safety issues for pedestrians. Other
cities enforce this issue and charge a permit fee to park vehicles on the street.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Motion by Commissioner Vice-Chair Linke, seconded by Commissioner Proulx to approve Consent Item
Nos. 1 and 2. Motion carried: 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Newlands)
1.EL CAMINO REAL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS FROM SUNNY CREEK ROAD TO JACKSPAR DRIVE,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT NO. 6094 – The Traffic & Mobility Commission
supported staff’s recommendation to approve the plans and specifications of the intersection
improvements at El Camino Real from Sunny Creek Road to Jackspar Drive, Capital Improvement
Program, or CIP, Project No. 6094.
Exhibit 4
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 57 of 83
Vice-Chair Linke inquired about the exception language on Item 1.
Associate Engineer Miles responded that the exception is the second paragraph background for
green paint in the bike lane conflicts. We will be working with traffic to add green paint in the bike
lane conflict areas.
2. EL CAMINO REAL ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS FROM POINSETTIA LANE TO CAMINO VIDA ROBLE,
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 6072 – The Traffic & Mobility Commission supported staff’s
recommendation to approve the plans and specifications of the intersection improvements at El
Camino Real from Poinsettia Lane to Camino Vida Roble, Capital Improvement Program, or CIP,
Project No. 6072.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS:
3. POLICE REPORT REGARDING TRAFFIC & MOBILITY-RELATED MATTERS DURING THE MONTH OF
SEPTEMBER 2022 – Receive a presentation from a representative of the City of Carlsbad’s Police
Department that provide an overview of traffic and mobility-related police matters during the
month of August 2022. (Staff Contact: Acting Sergeant George Zavala, Police Department)
Staff’s Recommendation: Receive a presentation
Acting Sergeant Zavala presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office
of the City Clerk)
Commissioner Coelho asked how the Police Department collect the community concerns and how do they
aggregate them so that they make the list shown in the presentation.
Acting Sergeant Zavala responded that they receive emails and phone calls from the community with the
mentioned concerns.
Vice-Chair Linke inquired about the multiple bicycle fatalities that happened in the month of August and
if the police department could share the information.
Acting Sergeant Zavala replied that one of the bicycle fatalities was caused by reckless driving. The
investigations on both fatalities are still ongoing and have potential criminal processing and filing.
4. APPROVE PLUM TREE ROAD AS AN EXCEPTION INTO PHASE II OF THE CARLSBAD RESIDENTIAL
TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND ALL-WAY STOP ANALYSIS AT THREE INTERSECTIONS –
1) Approve Plum Tree Road as an exception to the Phase II of the Carlsbad Residential Traffic
Management program.
2) Support staff’s recommendation to not install all-way stop on Plum Tree Road at Red Knot Street,
Robinea Drive and Windflower Drive. (Staff Contact: Lindy Pham and Miriam Jim, Public Works)
Staff’s Recommendation: Receive a presentation
Associate Engineer Pham and Senior Engineer Jim presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint
presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk)
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 58 of 83
Commissioner Coelho asked staff to elaborate on what it means to be in the Carlsbad Residential Traffic
Management Program. What is the path we are on if we know that we are not installing all-way stops?
Associate Engineer Pham responded that the process is the following: during the neighborhood meetings,
staff will present traffic calming strategies and other options that residents can consider such as speed
cushions or a traffic circle. Staff will receive comments and then go back and finalize the conceptual plan
and send out a survey to all the residents in the project area. The results of the survey will determine
whether we move forward with the project or not.
Commissioner Proulx clarified that staff will go back and review other options for the area, and she
inquired what is currently staff recommendation.
Associate Engineer Pham responded that staff is recommending that the commission grants approval of
the exception into phase two of the Carlsbad Traffic Management Program. The critical speed is below
the 32-mph threshold, so they are not currently eligible for any traffic calming measures.
Commissioner Fowler asked if speed cushions are the only option left.
Associate Engineer Pham said that speed cushions would be the most effective option in this area.
Vice-Chair Linke said that he supports the recommendation to approve the exception and added that
speed cushions are self-enforcing, and this approach should be used on all of the residential streets that
have speeding issues.
Chair Perez inquired about what speed cushion is compared to a speed bump.
Associate Engineer Pham responded that speed bumps are often found in commercial parking areas as
they are narrower and more abrupt. Speed cushions are more gradual. They are about 12 feet wide and
span the length of the roadway bed.
Commissioner Coelho commented that this is an opportunity to look beyond Plum Tree Road to get the
change that we want at Poinsettia Park to enhance the conditions. Maybe add alternate entrances to the
park, or striping on Paseo Del Norte.
Commissioner Penseyres commented that when we use the critical speed of 32-mph this still means that
15 percent of the people are driving faster than that. If residents are asking for solutions, then we need
to look way beyond the 32-mph threshold. Speeding is the most common cause of serious injuries and
fatalities on these residential streets.
Commissioner Proulx inquired about the distance between the two stop signs on Plum Tree Road.
Associate Engineer Pham responded that there is an intersection between the two stop signs and we don’t
have the distance noted in the presentation. Residents have complained that vehicles do not always stop
at these stop signs. We will work with the residents to find a solution once they are accepted into the
CRTMP.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 59 of 83
Motion by Commissioner Coelho, seconded by Commissioner Proulx to approve staff recommendations
for items 1 and 2. Motion carried: 6/0/0/1 (Absent: Newlands)
5.PRESENTATION ABOUT COMPLETE STREETS IN CARLSBAD AND ACTIONS TAKEN SINCE THE AUG. 23,
2022, PROCLAMATION OF A LOCAL TRAFFIC SAFETY EMERGENCY - Receive a presentation about
complete streets in Carlsbad and actions taken since the Aug. 23, 2022, proclamation of a local
traffic safety emergency. (Staff Contact: Tom Frank, Public Works)
Staff’s Recommendation: Receive a presentation
Transportation Director Frank presented the report and reviewed a PowerPoint presentation (on file in
the Office of the City Clerk)
Chair Perez asked staff to go over the process of what will happen at the meeting being held on Oct. 27,
2022.
Transportation Director Frank said that the meeting on Oct. 27, will be a commissioners meeting. There
are 44 options on attachment A for consideration. We will be looking for your recommendations for City
Council.
Chair Perez inquired if they ask questions about the 44 options presented.
Transportation Director Frank says that yes, the commission can ask questions on the options.
Commissioner Coelho asked how this will overlay with City Council’s meetings and their timeline?
Transportation Director Frank responded that City Council directed staff to get the public input as well as
the Planning Commission and the Traffic & Mobility Commission. On Nov. 8, 2022, staff will present the
recommendations received from the Planning Commission, the Traffic & Mobility Commission and from
the public to the City Council.
Commissioner Coelho asked if the intent is to review all 44 items and provide a recommendation or
to provide a recommendation on all 44 items?
Transportation Director Frank responded that it is to review the options and provide recommendations
to the City Council.
Commissioner Proulx asked about education, engineering and enforcement, the three E’s. Assuming that
relates to the comments which show changing laws, controlling speed and more enforcement. It looks
like change laws is not part of the three E’s. Did this come out of the community input?
Transportation Director Frank said that was part of the communications input effort which was used to
tailor the approach for the three E’s.
Commissioner Proulx asked how staff will accommodate the change laws suggestion.
Transportation Director Frank said that will be covered under the enforcement efforts.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 60 of 83
Commissioner Penseyres inquired about Assembly Bill 43 if it is already in effect.
Transportation Director Frank said that he does not have this information about Assembly Bill 43 which
provides cities more flexibility to set their speed limits on their residential roadways. Cities would not
have to comply with the 85-percentile rule. We are reviewing what a work plan would look like
to review the speed limits throughout the city.
Commissioner Penseyres inquired if staff are monitoring driver behavior before and after to see how they
are responding to the green paint?
Transportation Director Frank said that he does not believe staff have gone out to do an evaluation
of traffic operations since we have put down the recent green markings. It is something that we will be
looking at in the future.
Commissioner Penseyres said that one of the projects was to consider rumble strips. The rumble strips
would be installed where there are buffered bike lanes. The rumble strips would be on the inner stripe of
the buffer. Is that correct? How did you decide to make it the inner stripe versus the outer stripe?
Transportation Director Frank said this is correct and would be for higher speed roadways. It is something
that could be considered and would be brought in front of the public for discussion. We would reach out
to the bicycle clubs for input as well. The rumble strip would be inside of the outer bike lane stripe. It
is the bike lane stripe on the inside closest to the vehicle. The intent is to notify the driver if they are
weaving over the initial bike lane line. It also provides more room for the bicyclists to ride side by side if
they choose to.
Vice-Chair Linke asked about whether the staff plans to present any aspect of this plan to City Council
again before the meeting on Nov. 8, 2022.
Transportation Director Frank said that staff is required as part of the emergency proclamation to go back
to City Council every 60 days. They will be going back to City Council on Oct. 18, 2022, and he is sure there
will be some mention of the actions taken as part of the Safer Streets Together Program. City Council
has already acted on Option A which is moving forward. City Council will be considering options in
addition to Option A on Nov. 8, 2022.
Vice-Chair Linke asked about one of the aspects of Option A which is vision zero commitment. Can staff
present to us what that commitment actually entails at the next meeting. As an example, on the vision
zero website it says the absolute core strategy focuses in on speeds. The goal is for all non-arterial streets
to have a speed limit of 20-mph. On arterial streets the absolute limit should be 30 to 35-mph. It is a step
too far to say that all arterial streets should have a speed limit of 30 to 35-mph. In the absence of making
that the speed limit on arterial streets it is to have protected bike lanes with physical barriers and
automated speed enforcement. What is the goal for our arterial streets as far as the speed limit, the
installation of protected bike lanes and the installation of the automated speed enforcement?
Deputy City Manager Gomez responded that at the City Council meeting they discussed Vision Zero. The
intent is for staff to return with a draft resolution supporting the Vision Zero concept and then City Council
will task and direct staff to come back with an action plan on how we are going to move forward. It is in
concept at this point and there won’t be any additional information by the Oct. 27, meeting. City Council
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 61 of 83
has indicated that they want staff to move forward with Vision Zero and staff will look at that and will be
asking for assistance on developing the plan.
Vice-Chair Linke asked if the Traffic and Mobility Commission will have a chance to review the resolution
on Oct. 27, special meeting before it goes before City Council.
Transportation Director Frank responded that there is no time schedule given for staff to return to address
the Vision Zero resolution. The local agency gets to tailor their own Vision Zero program and therefore
changing speed limits on Palomar Airport Road and El Camino Real down to 35-mph would be a serious
consideration. He does not see the community getting behind that change. Staff will look at what makes
sense for City of Carlsbad.
Deputy City Manager Gomez said that on the special meeting on Oct. 27, the Traffic and Mobility
Commission will have the ability to weigh in on what they would like to see for the City of Carlsbad.
Commissioner Coelho asked if each segment of road will be evaluated individually for Vision Zero and
hopes that we are not just going to blanket the entire city with one speed limit.
Commissioner Proulx said that she also viewed the website and understands that Vision Zero are
strategies that we can implement within the city and not specific ideas that we have to implement. We
can do what works within our community. Are we looking to hire a consultant to write this plan?
Vice-Chair Linke asked if Option C could be considered without the $44 Million school bussing program?
In his opinion, speed cushions and access plans would be more effective than crosswalks.
Deputy City Manager Gomez said the questions should be deferred until the special meeting.
CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER COMMENTS:
Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt said last week he sent out an email outlining the
process for the Commissioners to agendize an item. There are three opportunities for bike training this
month. On Oct. 4, there is a Smart Cycling Class being held virtually from 6:00 pm – 9:00 pm.
You can register through the San Diego County Bike Coalition.
On Oct. 15, there is Smart City Cycling and that is in the city of Encinitas. This is an abbreviated course
from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 pm.
On Oct. 18, there is a bicycle friendly driver course virtually from 12:00 pm – 1:00 pm.
On Oct. 25, is the Annual Boards and Commissioners Event and he encourages everyone to attend to
celebrate their hard work.
TRAFFIC AND MOBILITY COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Commissioner Penseyres said they had a Smart Cycling class for the City of Carlsbad Police Department
this past week. The intent is for these police officers to go on and take a league certified seminar so they
can become instructors and teach others.
Vice-Chair Linke brought up the public comment on Valley Street and Tamarack Avenue and inquired if
staff has an update. There was a promise that staff would evaluate how it is working. Are there any
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 62 of 83
metrics that will be used to evaluate how well it is working?
Transportation Director Frank said that staff has committed to a three-phase approach to addressing
traffic concerns at the intersection of Tamarack Avenue and Valley Street. You heard about Phase A
which we are moving forward with. We have a public meeting scheduled for next week to assess the
speeding between Skyline Drive and Adams Street. The second phase is addressing the traffic signal and
intersection improvements that are nearly complete. What staff committed to was returning to the Traffic
and Mobility Commission within six months of completion of those improvements. We will be analyzing
what will be included in that study which will be both quantitative and qualitative. We will review what
operations have taken place. The third phase is what we consider our transformative project on Tamarack
Avenue and that is following our Sustainable Mobility Plan. That is not going to be worked on until the
next fiscal year due to staff’s workload. There will be plenty of public outreach opportunities. We have
been addressing some construction related issues tied to the improvements and are working with our
existing contractor and staff to alleviate some of these concerns.
Vice-Chair Linke brought up the other public comment about speeding in Snug Harbor. Is there an update
on this issue?
Transportation Director Frank said staff will follow-up on that.
Vice-Chair Linke inquired if there is an update on the Multi-Modal Level of Service since the last meeting
of the Ad-Hoc Committee meeting on Aug. 3, 2022.
Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt replied that the consultant is updating the tool
and performing the field work analysis. Once completed they will have another ad-hoc committee
meeting to present the results and consequently bring to the Traffic and Mobility Commission.
Commissioner Penseyres asked to see the results in advance to have time to look at what is being done
and provide feedback. He said something good to come out of the City Council meeting last week is that
they want to give the Traffic and Mobility Commission about a month to review all the documents. Do we
know how soon before the meeting that we will have the information in front of us?
Transportation Planning and Mobility Manager Schmidt said that he can commit to provide the ad-hoc
Committee a sufficient amount of time to review the results.
Vice-Chair Linke wants to remind everyone about the Communication Plan. It says when City Staff plans
to bring forward an item related to the Work Plan for action to the Planning Commission or the City
Council, staff will seek an advisory recommendation from the Commission beforehand. He says the plan
they were presented today falls under the Traffic and Mobility Commissions duties and we should be
reviewing it and in contact with some of the City Council members. Staff then decided to bring it to the
Traffic and Mobility Commission as an information only item but not for feedback. The City Council has
since voted to have us review it. He is frustrated as when he first joined the Traffic and Mobility
Commission three years ago they were being bypassed on the most significant issues. He feels we are
reverting back to that and that there are a lot of issues that we have been bypassed on.
Staff has gone directly to City Council with items that are on our Work Plan. We need to get back to the
point where our Commission is reviewing these items.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 63 of 83
Chair Perez commented on the pedestrian bridge between Cannon Road and El Camino Real that is
operational, and it is beautiful. Lastly, schools are working on sustainability. For Hope Elementary, is
there something we can do about idle parking? Is there something we can do to bring attention to this
issue? Can we provide information on this or on greenhouse gas?
Transportation Director Frank said that staff are working with Hope Elementary to develop their safe
routes to school and access plan. Please let us know of any specific people you are talking with that we
can reach out to about the idle parking.
ADJOURNMENT:
Chair Perez adjourned the Traffic & Mobility Commission Special Meeting on Oct. 3, 2022, at 6:30 p.m.
___________________________
Eliane Paiva, Minutes Clerk
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 64 of 83
City Council Chamber
1200 Carlsbad Village Drive
Carlsbad, CA 92008
May 3, 2023
CALL TO ORDER: 5:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Hubinger, Kamenjarin, Lafferty, Meenes, Stine, Sabellico, and Merz
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Hubinger led the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on April 5, 2023
Minutes of the Regular Meeting held on April 19, 2023
Motion by Commissioner Meenes, seconded by Commissioner Kamenjarin, to approve the
minutes of the Regular Meeting held April 5, 2023, 6/0/1. (Hubinger – Abstain).
Motion by Commissioner Stine, seconded by Commissioner Kamenjarin, to approve the minutes
of the Regular Meeting held April 19, 2023, 7/0.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Lance Schulte discussed his experience in the field of city planning and made comments related
to community input.
CONSENT CALENDAR: None.
At the request of Chair Merz, Item #4 was moved to the end of the agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
This item was continued from the April 19, 2023, Planning Commission Regular Meeting.
1.CDP 2021-0056/V 2021-0003 (DEV2021-0227) – EDWARDS RESIDENCE - Adoption of a
resolution approving a coastal development permit and minor variance to allow for the
demolition of an existing single-family residence and construction of a new 3,277-square-
foot, three-story single-family residence with a 537-square-foot attached accessory dwelling
unit (under a separate coastal development permit) and attached two-car garage and a front
yard setback reduction of five feet and a rear yard setback reduction of one foot six inches,
within the Mello II Segment of the city’s Local Coastal Program located at 2669 Garfield Street
within Local Facilities Management Zone 1.
ACTION TYPE: Quasi-judicial
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution.
PLANNER: Eric Lardy ENGINEER: Nichole Fine
City Planner Eric Lardy introduced and reviewed the PowerPoint presentation (on file in the
Office of the City Clerk) addressing the concerns that were raised in the last meeting,
-Amended
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes
Exhibit 5
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 65 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 2
At Chairperson Merz request, the following Commissioner provided his additional disclosure:
•Commissioner Sabellico disclosed that he visited the site with special attention to the
ocean view.
Commissioner Lafferty expressed concerns that approving this could be setting a bad
precedent and she cannot support this item.
City planner Lardy responded to Commissioner Lafferty’s comments noting the variance
discussed and the alternative design streets policy are two different issues and indicated that
if City Council recommends that the alternative design streets policy be re-evaluated, they
will do so at that time.
Commissioner Lafferty offered to share the APA’s Planning for Equity Policy Guide with the
other members of the Commission adding that perhaps the Commission should consider
policies from there.
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s inquiry about the impact of building this home
without the variance, Applicant Sam Wright responded that the City would be restricting a
homeowner from building a home similar in value to their neighbors noting that most homes
on that street have the 15-foot front yard setback.
The applicant’s Civil Engineer, John Strominger, added that the city required the developer to
design streets that facilitate future construction of future street improvements like sidewalks.
Chair Merz opened the public testimony at 5:25 p.m. and asked if there were any members of
the public who wished to speak on the project.
Seeing no one else wishing to speak, Chair Merz closed the public testimony at 5:26 p.m.
In response to Commissioner Stine's request for confirmation that there is no reason to
suspect that the applicant’s statement regarding the 15-foot setbacks in the neighborhood is
not accurate, Commissioner Lafferty pointed out that the corner house on the Google maps
picture has sidewalks and a 15-foot setback and City Planner Lardy added that staff has no
reason to believe the statement is inaccurate.
Commissioner discussion began.
Commissioner Stine, Commissioner Meenes and Chair Merz expressed their support for this
project.
Motion by Commissioner Meenes, seconded by Commissioner Sabellico, to adopt Resolution
No.7478. Motion carried, 6/1 (Lafferty No).
Chair Merz closed the public hearing at 5:32 p.m.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 66 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 3
2. CDP 2022-0052 (DEV2022-0013) – KANTER RESIDENCE – Adoption of a resolution
recommending approval of a coastal development permit for the construction of a two-story,
615-square-foot addition and a 402-square-foot second story deck to an existing single-family
residence within the Mello II Segment of the city’s Local Coastal Program located at 7249
Mimosa Drive within Local Facilities Management Zone 6.
ACTION TYPE: Quasi-judicial
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution.
PLANNER: Lauren Yzaguirre ENGINEER: Nichole Fine
Chair Merz opened the duly noticed public hearing at 5:33p.m.
City Planner Eric Lardy introduced the item and announced that Associate Planner Lauren
Yzaguirre will not be making a presentation, but that she is available for questions.
At Chair Merz’s request, the following Commissioners made disclosures as follows:
•Commissioner Hubinger drove by the site
•Commissioner Kamenjarin drove by and walked the area
•Commissioner Meenes drove by and walked the site
•Commissioner Stine drove by the site
•Commissioner Sabellico drove by the site
•Chairperson Merz drove by the site
In response to Chair Merz’s inquiry as to whether construction had begun on the project,
Associate Planner Yzaguire confirmed that it had but was halted due to the need for an
updated permit requirement which is why this item is before the Commission.
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s question, Associate Planner Yzaguirre responded that
the applicant had a permit to start construction legally, but a plan/construction change
required them to stop construction and update their application from a Minor Coastal
Development Permit to a Major Coastal Development Permit.
In response to Commissioner Stine’s inquiry, Associate Planner Yzaguirre confirmed that
there are no scenic corridor issues with this project.
Chair Merz opened the public testimony at 5:38 p.m. and asked if there were any members of
the public who wished to speak on the item.
Seeing none, Chair Merz closed public testimony at 5:39 p.m.
Motion by Commissioner Meenes, seconded by Commissioner Stine, to adopt Resolution No.
7479. Motion carried, 7/0.
Chair Merz closed the public hearing at 5:40 p.m.
3. CDP 2023-0010 - AVENIDA ENCINAS COASTAL RAIL TRAIL AND PEDESTRIAN
IMPROVEMENTS – Adoption of a resolution approving a coastal development permit for Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 67 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 4
Avenida Encinas Coastal Rail Trail improvements on property generally located along Avenida
Encinas Road between Poinsettia Lane and Windrose Circle in Local Facilities Management
Zones 9 and 22.
ACTION TYPE: Quasi-judicial
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution.
PLANNER: Izzak Mireles ENGINEER: Emad Elias
Chair Merz opened the duly noticed public hearing at 5:40 p.m.
City Planner Eric Lardy introduced the item and Associate Planner Izzak Mireles who reviewed
a PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
At Chair Merz’s request, the following Commissioners made disclosures as follows:
•Commissioner Stine walked by the project
•Commissioner Meenes walked the site
•Commissioner Lafferty indicated familiarity with the site
•Commissioner Kamenjarin has driven by the site
•Chair Merz has driven by the site
•Commissioner Sabellico has driven the site many times
In response to Commissioner Meenes’ inquiry regarding loss of service (LOS) remaining an A
category, Associate Planner Mireles explained that the General Plan and mobility element
claim is that a certain level of service needs to be maintained. He added that in this case the
vehicles that travel in north and southbound lanes will not be changed with the addition of
the bicycle lanes.
Chair Merz opened the public testimony at 5:45 p.m.
Chaz Wick expressed his support for the project and requested more safety precautions for
pedestrians in the corridor.
Chairperson Merz closed the public testimony at 5:48 p.m.
In response to Commissioner Meenes’ request for information on improvements included in
the project, Associate Engineer Brandon Miles responded with a list of improvements the City
has made, based on its research in the area including enhanced crosswalks, other
pedestrian/safety improvements and traffic slowing measures including narrowing streets.
In response to Commissioner Stine’s question if there are plans to improve the Windsor Circle
crosswalk mentioned in the public comment, Associate Engineer Miles explained the
improvements that are already planned for the crosswalk.
In response an inquiry by Commissioner Lafferty, City Planner Lardy explained that this
project design and construction contract was approved by the City Council based on
conversations with the Coastal Commission. Mr. Lardy added that since the project changes
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 68 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 5
capacity of the roadway, staff are processing the Coastal Development Permit prior to
construction.
Commissioner Stine expressed support this project adding that it is a good public safety
measure.
Commissioner Sabellico concurred, adding that he appreciates the city’s commitment to
safety.
Motion by Commissioner Stine, seconded by Commissioner Meenes, to adopt Resolution No.
7480. Motion carried, 7/0.
Chair Merz closed the public hearing at 5:56pm.
5. CDP 2022-0019/V 2022-0002 (DEV 2022-0005) – HOM RESIDENCE: RETAINING WALL
VARIANCE – Adoption of a resolution recommending approval of a coastal development
permit and variance to allow an unpermitted retaining wall system and wood deck that
exceeds standards on a manufactured uphill perimeter slope with a gradient greater than 40
percent and an elevation differential of greater than fifteen feet on property located at 2170
Twain Avenue within the Mello II Segment of the city’s Local Coastal Program and Local
Facilities Management Zone .
ACTION TYPE: Quasi-judicial
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution.
PLANNER: Kyle Van Leeuwen ENGINEER: Allison McLaughlin
Chair Merz opened the duly noticed public hearing at 5:57 p.m.
At Chair Merz’s request, the following Commissioners made disclosures as follows:
•Commissioner Stine drove by the property, parked & walked the area
•Commissioner Meenes drove by the site and walked the side street
•Commissioner Kamenjarin drove by the property
•Chair Merz visited site and looked over the fence
City Planner Eric Lardy introduced the item and Planner Kyle Van Leeuwen who reviewed a
PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
In response to Commissioner Meenes’ question about the City being able to discern if the
integrity of the walls completed follow City regulations, Associate Planner Kyle Van Leeuwen
explained that the soil and the retaining wall were tested on multiple occasions, and staff can
say confidently that it is safe and built to a certain level of standards. Mr. Van Leeuwen added
that the City used an outside evaluator for geological stability as an additional measure for
stability.
In response to Commissioner Stine’s inquiry, Planner Van Leeuwen confirmed that the
property owners halted construction upon learning they did not have a permit and have been
cooperative through the entire process.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 69 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 6
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s question, Associate Planner Van Leeuwen explained
that this was an unusual circumstance where the contractor misled the residents and as far
as informing Carlsbad residents in general, the City staff does the best they can to explain
regulations to applicants. Mr. Van Leeuwen added that this is a well-known section of our
code for planners who work the counter and typically people do come in and ask clarifying
questions.
Applicant’s representative Paul Klukkas spoke in support of the Homs and reiterated the
information provided by Associate City Planner Van Leeuwen.
Chair Merz opened the public testimony at 6:23p.m.
The following individuals spoke in support of the project: Ray Patchett, Robert Hom, Ivan
Mendelson, Daniel Toro.
Chair Merz asked if there were any more members of the public who wished to speak on the
project. Hearing no one else wishing to speak, he closed the public testimony at 6:33pm.
In response to Commissioner Stine’s question as to whether staff received any comments in
opposition to this application, Associate Planner Van Leeuwen replied no.
Commissioner Stine explained he will support the variance.
Motion by Commissioner Meenes, seconded by Commissioner Stine, to adopt Resolution
No. 7483. Motion carried, 7/0.
Chair Merz closed the public hearing at 6:40 p.m.
6. CDP 2021-0044/HDP 2022-0008/SUP 2021-0002/SUP 2022-0002 (PUB 2020-0009) – EL
CAMINO REAL ROAD WIDENING - Adoption of a resolution recommending approval of a
coastal development permit, hillside development permit, special use permit – floodplain,
and special use permit – El Camino Real, and a waiver of General Plan Open Space Policy 4-
p.6 to allow for road improvements along El Camino Real for property generally located
within the public rights-of-way on El Camino Real from Jackspar Drive to Sunny Creek Road,
within Local Facilities Management Zone 15.
ACTION TYPE: Quasi-judicial
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution.
PLANNER: Izzak Mireles ENGINEER: Tim Carroll
Chair Merz opened the duly noticed public hearing at 6:42 p.m.
Commissioner Sabellico recused himself because he lives in a community that uses that
intersection regularly.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 70 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 7
At Chair Merz’s request, the following Commissioners made disclosures as follows:
•Commissioner Lafferty is familiar with the site and researched historic registry
•Commissioner Stine is familiar with site and drives by regularly
•Commissioner Meenes is familiar with site and drives by regularly
•Commissioner Hubinger is familiar with site and has driven by many times
•Chair Merz is familiar with site and drives by regularly
City Planner Eric Lardy introduced the item and Associate Planner Izzak Mireles made the
staff PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
Associate Engineer Brandon Miles responded to Commissioner Meenes that City Council
directed staff to move forward with improvements without waiting for a developer to assist
with the cost.
Associate Planner Mireles responded to Commissioner Stine that there were questions but
no opposition to this project.
Engineering Manager Jason Geldert replied to Commissioner Lafferty’s preservation concerns
by explaining that this is this is a low vibration work zone. He explained that with this type of
grading it is not necessary to measure since no extra amount of vibration is going on. He
added that experience and understanding of how vibrations effect construction informs staff
that there is no threat to adobes from this project.
Chair Merz asked if there were any members of the public who wished to speak on the project.
Seeing none, he opened and closed public testimony at 6:58 p.m.
Motion by Commissioner Kamenjarin, seconded by Commissioner Hubinger, to adopt
Resolution No. 7484. Motion carried, 6/1 (Sabellico – Absent).
Chair Merz closed the public hearing at 7 p.m.
Chair Merz called for a 5-minute break at 7 p.m.
Chair Merz called the meeting back to order at 7:08 p.m.
4.SDP2022-0003, CDP2022-0023, and PCD2023-0001 (DEV2022-0048) – FPC RESIDENTIAL - 1)
Adoption of a resolution denying the appeal and upholding the City Planners’ determination
that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act; and 2) Adoption of
a resolution approving a site development plan and a coastal development permit to
consolidate three parcels of land, demo an existing self-storage facility, former junkyard, and
two abandoned structures, and construct 86 two- and three-story multiple-family residential
apartments on a 4.64 acre property located at 7200, 7290, and 7294 Ponto Drive in the
southwest quadrant of the city and Local Facilities Management Zone 22.
ACTION TYPE: Quasi-judicial
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolutions.
PLANNER: Jason Goff ENGINEER: Allison McLaughlin
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 71 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 8
Chair Merz recused himself from Item No. 4 due to a potential conflict of interest since he is a
partner at Lee & Associates, the commercial real estate firm involved with both the seller and
the buyer of a certain parcel of the project.
In the absence of Chair Merz, Vice-Chair Sabellico acted as chair for the item.
City Planner Lardy reviewed the appeal hearing procedures.
Vice-Chair Sabellico opened the duly noticed public hearing at 7:10 p.m.
At Vice-Chair Sabellico’s request, the following Commissioners made disclosures as follows:
•Commissioner Stine indicated familiarity with the site, has walked perimeter and
surrounding areas
•Commissioner Meenes drove and walked perimeter of the site on Ponto
•Commissioner Lafferty drove by the site
•Commissioner Kamenjarin indicated familiarity with the site
•Commissioner Hubinger indicated familiarity with the site
•Commissioner Sabellico visited the site and is familiar with someone who is speaking
on behalf of the applicant adding that he will still be fair and impartial
Upon Commissioner Meenes’ request, Senior Assistant City Attorney Ronald Kemp reminded
the Commission that the role of the Planning Commission is to assure that all the land use
decisions are consistent with the policies plans and ordinances adopted by the City Council,
state and federal law. Additionally, Mr. Kemp reminded the Commissioners about the
Housing Accountability Act to encourage local jurisdictions on housing that directs
Committees to approve housing projects unless they pose a safety or health threat that
cannot be mitigated.
City Planner Eric Lardy introduced the item and Senior Planner Jason Goff reviewed a
PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s inquiry as to the sequence of consideration for this
appeal, Senior Assistant City Attorney Kemp recommended that Commissioners consider the
appeal of the City Planner’s determination first because if the City Planner’s determination is
upheld, the Commission can go on to consider the project. Mr. Kemp added that if it is
determined that the appellant is correct, then there is no environmental finding, and it would
be sent back to staff.
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s inquiry as to whether there was documentation of
the remediation and if there was a biological report done, Planner Goff responded that there
was a biological report.
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s question about the most recent Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) City Planner Eric Lardy responded that the 2015 EIR studied the city
comprehensively, but that the determination did not rely on that for the exemption. Mr.
Lardy added that this exemption could have occurred regardless of that EIR. Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 72 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 9
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s question as to whether the City has been to the site
for analysis, City Planner Lardy explained that no, the analysis looked at the databases
available that would list sites with hazardous materials, and nothing was identified on the
site.
The applicant, David Gatsky of H.G. Fenton Company, conducted a PowerPoint presentation
of the FPC Residential project. (On file in the Office of the City Clerk.)
In response to Commissioner Stine’s request for more information regarding the amenities
and open space this project offers, Mr. Gatsky replied with a review of that section of the
slide show and reaffirmed the developers goal is to provide the residents with some type of
park like amenities with the open space and places to play.
In response to Commissioner Stine’s comment regarding the community’s request for park
dedication, the developer discussed the community engagement they did in the
neighborhood around the topic and explained the City Council has decided that what they
want to do to serve residents within this facilities management zone, in this part of the city,
is to collect a fee to support parks located elsewhere. The developer added that this is
consistent with the facilities plan.
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s inquiry regarding the necessity of reduced setbacks,
Mr. Gatsky responded that setback reductions are proposed along the street frontage
because they wanted to create a strong street scene and neighborly atmosphere.
Commissioner Lafferty acknowledged the gas line was another constraint and requested an
explanation since the setbacks are 7,000 square feet when there is 64,000 square feet of open
space. Mr. Gatsky added that the developer found that to be the best compromise since it
would allow the developer to create private, usable, open space in the rear yards.
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s questions about why there are only 13 low-income
units being provided, not 20, Mr. Gatsky explained that the developer meets the
requirements with 15% of the 86 units provided being affordable. Mr. Gatsky added that if
the developer offered more units, then the low-income number of units offered would also
increase.
Senior Assistant City Attorney Kemp added that the setbacks in question are a waiver under
density bonus law, which is something the City is required to give in return for the density
bonus.
In response to Commissioner Sabellico’ s question about a fence in between residences and
the rail on the easter edge of the project, Mr. Gatsky replied in the affirmative and added
that the wall will provide safety as well as sound and vibration protection.
Vice Chair Sabellico directed the appellant, Mr. Lance Schulte to begin his PowerPoint
presentation appealing the Planning Commission’s decision to move forward with this project
(on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 73 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 10
City Planner Lardy responded to Mr. Schulte’s appeal to the project in a PowerPoint
presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
Vice Chair Sabellico invited the appellant to the podium for questions.
In response to Commissioner Stine's request for clarification of the gas line, Sr. Planner Goff
confirmed that it runs up the spine of the project.
In response to Commissioner Stine’s question regarding the validity of the applicant’s studies,
Mr. Schulte explained state law and case law dictate that the studies need to be done publicly
and the applicant’s studies were not.
In response to Commissioner Stine’s request for the Senior Assistant City Attorney Kemp’s
opinion on Mr. Schulte’s last comment regarding applicant studies; Mr. Kemp emphasized
that the infill exemption requires the Planning Commissioners to consider if the project does
result in any significant effects in the area relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality.
Mr. Kemp added it is a part of 15332 and he also mentioned he is not aware of any case law
that makes conducting studies a violation of CEQA.
In response to Commissioner Stine’s question regarding the distance to Poinsettia Park, Mr.
Schulte agreed it is 2.5 miles from the site of this project and added that a freeway must be
crossed to get there.
In response to Commissioner Sabellico’ s question if a CEQA exemption is ever justified, Mr.
Schulte responded that he does think they are justified when the answer is clear that there is
no threat to the environment.
Commissioner Stine asked if Mr. Schulte is arguing that the Planning Commission,
must impose a park requirement on this project. Mr. Schulte responded yes.
Senior City Attorney Kemp added that the section Mr. Schulte referenced, 20.44 of the
Carlsbad Municipal Code does not apply. Mr. Kemp argued the City can require the developer
to pay park in lieu fees, so the Planning Commission does not have the ability to require a
dedication of park land for this site.
In response to Commissioner Stine’s inquiry regarding the claim this project is piecemealed,
Mr. Schulte explained the Ponto site 18 project overlays and expands upon the boundaries of
this project. Mr. Schulte argued that when the City takes that six-acre project that's not
exempt from CEQA and the City makes it a 5 acre project it has been piecemealed. In response
to this comment, City Planner Lardy added there are no private discretionary applications
that are pending or overlay this project and these three parcels did not have any boundary
adjustments. City Planner Lardy also added that the 4.6 acres was what was included in the
original application.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 74 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 11
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s request for clarification regarding the visitor
commercial zone not being a part of this, City Planner Lardy explained this is a split
designation zone and that this project is on 3 parcels and was submitted for residential use.
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s inquiry as to how the project will impact the recently
approved road reduction and lack of commercial properties nearby this site, City Planner
Lardy responded that now CEQA studies Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT) and California
Pollution Officers Association (CAPCOA), which is essentially the air pollution control office
association that sets forth guidelines of types of developments that they see, and the studies
have shown that higher density and low income, especially in areas such as Carlsbad, that
have major job centers, does tend to reduce VMT.
In response to Engineering Manager Jason Geldert’s question, Assistant City Attorney Kemp
reiterated that staff and the Commission are confined to what was raised in the appeal and
further clarified that if staff and Commissioners in evaluating this, think that what Mr. Schulte
has now said is not what is in the appeal, then the Planning Commission does not need to
consider it in their evaluation. Senior Assistant City Attorney Kemp also addressed the
unusual circumstance discussed earlier which is the 10-inch pipeline running through the
middle of the project. Mr. Kemp explained that the significance of making that statement is
they're pointing to 15300.2, which is the exemption to the exemption. Mr. Kemp continued
to explain that basically, the Commission needs to consider if someone says a 10-inch pipeline
on your property is an unusual circumstance you need to consider it by substantial evidence.
Mr. Kemp added that further consideration should be given to whether the appellant has
testimony, comparisons or other evidence with regards to the unusual circumstances that
will have an impact on the environment.
Vice Chair Sabellico opened public testimony at 8:57 p.m.
The following individuals spoke in opposition to the project: Kathleen Steindlberger, William
Rouch, Dale Ordas, Dolores Welty.
The following individuals spoke in support of the project: Bret Schazenbach, Eric Brovold,
Andrew Becht, Stacie Green, Jason Santos, Michael McSweeney, Hale Richardson and Heather
Riley.
Speaker Chas Wick requested that the developer build a park for the residents nearby.
Vice Chair Sabellico reopened the public testimony at 9:14 p.m. to add the following 15
residents’ names who submitted speaker cards to the record in support of the project but did
not wish to speak at the hearing: Ruben Caballos, Mary Chaparro, Emilie Colwell, Tadd Dolfo,
Constance Gaughan, Shannon Gaunt, Rhiann Haymes, Whitney Hodges, Anisa Kremer, Toni
McMahon, William Morrison, Jeff O’Conner, Angie Ortiz, Chris Rosink, Nicole Weiman.
Vice Chair Sabellico closed the public testimony at 9:16 p.m.
Commissioner Stine, Vice Chair Sabellico, Commissioners Meenes and Kamenjarin expressed
their support of the project and staff’s recommendation.
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 75 of 83
Planning Commission Minutes May 3, 2023 Page 12
Motion by Commissioner Meenes, seconded by Commissioner Stine to adopt Resolution No
7481. Motion carried, 6/0/1 (Merz – Absent).
Vice Chair Sabellico, Commissioner Stine, Commissioner Meenes and Commissioner
Kamenjarin expressed his support for the rest of staff’s recommendations.
Motion by Commissioner Stine, seconded by Commissioner Meenes to adopt Resolution No.
7482. Motion carried, 6/0/1 (Merz – Absent).
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS/COMMENTS:
In response to Commissioner Lafferty’s question regarding if the Commission is supposed to end
meetings in four hours, Senior Assistant City Attorney Kemp responded that he did not find
anything in the City's Municipal Code dictating that.
Commissioner Lafferty announced that the next Historic Preservation meeting will be held
Monday, May 8, 2023.
Commissioner Stine informed the Commission that the Growth Management Citizen’s
Committee has completed its work and there will be a report consistent with The City’s
determinations on performance standards going to the City Council.
CITY PLANNER REPORTS: None.
CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS: None.
ADJOURNMENT:
Vice Chair Sabellico adjourned the duly noticed meeting at 9:35 p.m.
Cynthia Vigeland
Administrative Secretary
Cynthia Vigeland
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 76 of 83
CALL TO ORDER: 5 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Blackburn, Bhat-Patel, Acosta, Burkholder, Luna.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CONCURRENT MEETINGS: None.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Assistant City Manager Geoff Patnoe led the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Minutes of the Special Meeting held Aug. 22, 2023
Minutes of the Special Meeting held Aug. 29, 2023
Minutes of the Special Meeting held Sept. 12, 2023
Minutes of the Special Meeting held Sept. 14, 2023
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel, seconded by Council Member Acosta, to approve the
minutes as presented. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0.
PRESENTATIONS:
Proclamation in recognition of Public Safety Month
Mayor Blackburn read the proclamation. Assistant Fire Marshal Darcy Davidson, Police Chief
Mickey Williams, and Public Works Facility Attendant Jose Estrada said a few words.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Mary Lucid spoke regarding the operational hours of the library.
Paige DeCino spoke regarding building electrification.
Lynda Daniels spoke regarding building electrification.
Raul Villamar voiced his concerns regarding the low income housing and roundabout in his
neighborhood.
PUBLIC REPORT OF ANY ACTION TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: None.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel, seconded by Council Member Acosta, to approve Consent
Calendar Item Nos. 1 through 4. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0.
1.LOAN AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD FOR
FUNDING FOR THE WASTEWATER SUPERVISORY CONTROL AND DATA ACQUISITION PROJECT
Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-241 approving a loan agreement with the California State
Sept. 26, 2023, 5 p.m.
Exhibit 6
DR
A
F
T
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 77 of 83
Water Resources Control Board for funding the Wastewater Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition Project. (Staff contact: Vicki Quiram and Shoshana Aguilar, Public Works
Department)
2.AGREEMENT WITH SCHNEIDER CM TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND
INSPECTION SERVICES FOR THE VETERANS MEMORIAL PARK PROJECT (CIP PROJECT NO.
4609) – Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-242 approving a professional service agreement
with Schneider CM for construction management and inspection services for the Veterans
Memorial Park Project, in an amount not to exceed $1,390,164. (Staff contact: Steven Didier,
Public Works Department)
3.ACCEPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 ALCOHOL POLICING PARTNERSHIP GRANT – Adoption
of Resolution No. 2023-243 authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with the
California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to accept $40,520 in Fiscal Year 2023-
24 Alcohol Policing Partnership grant funds and authorizing the Deputy City Manager,
Administrative Services or designee to appropriate funds to the Public Safety Grants Special
Revenue Fund. (Staff contact: Amanda Baker, Police Department)
4.ACQUISITION AND RESALE OF 2631 HANCOCK CIRCLE AS PART OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING
RESALE PROGRAM – Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-244 authorizing the City Manager to
execute all required documents to complete the purchase and resale of 2631 Hancock Circle
as part of the City’s Affordable Housing Resale Program. (Staff contact: Mandy Mills,
Community Services Department)
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION: None.
ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION:
5.ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. CS-459 AMENDING CARLSBAD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
1.20 MEETINGS – Adoption of Ordinance No. CS-459 amending Carlsbad Municipal Code
Chapter 1.20 Meetings. (Staff contact: Faviola Medina, City Clerk Department)
City Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt Ordinance No. CS-459.
City Attorney Cindie McMahon titled the ordinance.
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel, seconded by Council Member Acosta, to adopt
Ordinance No. CS-459. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0.
PUBLIC HEARING:
6.APPROVE A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, SPECIAL USE
PERMIT - FLOODPLAIN, SPECIAL USE PERMIT - EL CAMINO REAL CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS AND WAIVER OF GENERAL PLAN OPEN SPACE POLICY 4-P.6 FOR THE WIDENING
OF EL CAMINO REAL BETWEEN SUNNY CREEK ROAD AND JACKSPAR DRIVE (CDP2022-0044,
DR
A
F
T
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 78 of 83
HDP2021-0003, SUP2022-0002, SUP2021-0002) – Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-245
approving a coastal development permit, hillside development permit, special use permit
(floodplain, special use permit – El Camino Real corridor development standards) and a
waiver of General Plan Open Space Policy 4-P.6 to allow for a road improvement project along
El Camino Real generally located within the public right-of-way on El Camino Real from Sunny
Creek Road to Jackspar Drive within the Mello II segment of the city’s Local Coastal Program
and Local Facilities Management Zone 15. (Staff contact: Eric Lardy, Community Services
Department)
City Manager’s Recommendation: Take public input, close the public hearing and adopt the
resolution.
City Planner Eric Lardy and Transportation Director Tom Frank reviewed a PowerPoint
presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
Mayor Blackburn opened the duly noticed public hearing at 5:33 p.m.
Eric Gilmore spoke regarding his concern with the upcoming changes on El Camino Real.
Mayor Blackburn closed the duly noticed public hearing at 5:36 p.m.
In response to Council Member Luna’s inquiry, Transportation Director Tom Frank explained
that resident signage concerns have been accommodated by adding additional signage and
striping.
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel, seconded by Council Member Acosta, to adopt
Resolution No. 2023-245. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0.
DEPARTMENTAL AND CITY MANAGER REPORTS:
7.MAYORAL APPOINTMENT OF ONE MEMBER TO THE AGRICULTURAL CONVERSION
MITIGATION FEE CITIZENS’ ADVISORY COMMITTEE – Adoption of Resolution No. 223-246
appointing one member to the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee Citizens’ Advisory
Committee. (Staff contact: Tammy McMinn, City Clerk Department)
City Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt the resolution.
Motion by Mayor Blackburn to adopt Resolution No. 2023-246 appointing Spencer Burrows
to the Agricultural Conversion Mitigation Fee citizens’ Advisory Committee. Motion carried
unanimously, 5/0.
8.MAYORAL APPOINTMENT OF TWO MEMBERS TO THE SENIOR COMMISSION – 1) Adoption of
Resolution No. 2023-247 appointing one member to the Senior Commission; and
2) Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-248 appointing one member to the Senior Commission.
(Staff contact: Tammy McMinn, City Clerk Department)
DR
A
F
T
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 79 of 83
City Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt the resolutions.
Motion by Mayor Blackburn to adopt Resolution No. 2023-247 appointing Kathryn Rangus
and Resolution No. 2023-248 appointing Nelson Ross to the Senior Commission. Motion
carried unanimously, 5/0.
9.MAYORAL APPOINTMENT OF ONE MEMBER TO THE HOUSING COMMISSION – Adoption of
Resolution No. 2023-249 appointing one member to the Housing Commission – At-Large
Member. (Staff contact: Tammy McMinn, City Clerk Department)
City Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt the resolution.
Motion by Mayor Blackburn to adopt Resolution No. 2023-249 appointing Chi-Wu-Chang to
the Housing Commission. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0.
10. 2023-2030 PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN UPDATE – Adoption of a
resolution approving a 2023-250 Parks & Recreation Department Master Plan Update. (Staff
contact: Kyle Lancaster, Community Services Department)
City Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt the resolution.
Parks & Recreation Director Kyle Lancaster, Recreation Services Manager Mick Calarco and
Next Practice Partners Founder and CEO Neelay Bhatt reviewed a PowerPoint presentation
(on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
Mary Lucid spoke regarding the services at the Senior Center.
Ed Gorelick spoke regarding the need for more pickleball courts.
Tom Hirschberger spoke regarding the need for more pickleball courts and less tennis courts.
Parks & Recreation Commission Chair Bob Winston expressed his approval of the Parks &
Recreation Master Plan.
Dale Ordas spoke regarding the need for a park in the Southwest Quadrant of Carlsbad.
Zakk Sharp spoke regarding how pickleball saved his life and asked for more courts.
Preserve Calavera representative Diane Nygaard spoke regarding the need for neighborhood
parks that are walkable and accessible within 10 minutes.
Shirley Keating-Hudson spoke regarding the need for a park and open space in southwest
Carlsbad.
DR
A
F
T
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 80 of 83
Hanover Beach HOA Representative Mark O’Donnell spoke regarding the need for a park in
southwest Carlsbad.
Jodi Jones spoke regarding the need for a park in the southwest coastal area.
In response to Council Member Acosta’s inquiry, Parks & Recreation Director Lancaster
explained the 10 minute walkability map to the parks.
In response to Council Member Acosta’s inquiry, Parks & Recreation Director Lancaster
explained that Agua Hedionda Lagoon south shore is included in the Trails Master Plan and
referenced as Hub Park.
In response to Council Member Acosta’s inquiry, Parks & Recreation Director Lancaster
explained that a separate item will be brought back for the City Council’s consideration
regarding pickleball.
In response to Council Member Acosta’s inquiry, Next Practice Partners Founder and CEO
Bhatt explained how the survey was utilized and how many participants came from each zip
code.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel’s inquiry, Parks & Recreation Director Lancaster
explained that converting a tennis court to a pickleball court can be done but would be highly
expensive.
Motion by Council Member Acosta, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel, to request staff
to return with options for a park in the Southwest Quadrant in the Planning Area F.
Council Member Burkholder explained that the motion seemed to be moving forward while
ignoring a transportation project along with the state and other entities.
Mayor Blackburn explained that he would not be supporting the motion.
Motion by Council Member Acosta, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel, to request staff
to return with options for a park in the Southwest Quadrant. Motion failed 2/3 (Blackburn,
Burkholder, Luna – No).
City Attorney McMahon explained that the item already states that there is a bring-back item
regarding pickleball courts.
Motion by Mayor Blackburn, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel, directing staff to
prioritize the construction of new pickleball courts without the conversion or removal of
tennis courts as part of the returning item for City Council’s consideration. Motion carried
unanimously, 5/0.
DR
A
F
T
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 81 of 83
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel, seconded by Council Member Acosta, to adopt
Resolution No. 2023-250. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0.
11.GENERAL FUND SURPLUS POLICY: APPROVAL OF FISCAL YEAR 2022-23 BUDGET
CARRYFORWARD REQUESTS AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS TO FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 – 1)
Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-251 approving the fiscal year 2022-23 budget carryforward
requests and appropriation of funds to fiscal year 2023-24 and authorizing capital outlay
purchases; and
2) Adoption of Resolution 2023-252 approving the restriction of General Fund reserves in
fiscal year 2023-24 to fund the initial contribution to a Section 115 Trust; and
3) Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-253 approving the use of the fiscal year 2022-23 General
Fund surplus for appropriation and transfer to the city’s Workers’ Compensation Fund in fiscal
year 2023-24; and
4) Adoption of Resolution No. 2023-254 approving the use of the fiscal year 2022-23 General
Fund surplus for appropriation and transfer to the city’s Risk Management Fund in fiscal year
2023-24. (Staff contact: Zach Korach, Administrative Services Department)
City Manager’s Recommendation: Adopt the resolutions.
Finance Director Zach Korach rand Senior Management Analyst Jeremy Bates reviewed a
PowerPoint presentation (on file in the Office of the City Clerk).
Motion by Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel, seconded by Council Member Acosta, to adopt
Resolution No. 2023-251, Resolution No. 2023-252, Resolution No. 2023-253 and Resolution
No. 2023-254. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0.
COUNCIL REPORTS AND COMMENTS: Mayor Blackburn and the City Council Members reported
on activities and meetings of some committees and subcommittees of which they are members.
Minute Motion by Mayor Blackburn, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Bhat-Patel, requesting staff to
bring back for City Council’s consideration, an action item related to City Council Member’s use
of the City’s official logo and seal. Motion carried unanimously, 5/0.
ANNOUNCEMENTS: This section of the Agenda is designated for announcements to advise the
community regarding events that Members of the City Council have been invited to, and may
participate in.
Friday, Oct. 6, 2023
3 - 7 p.m.
MiraCosta College Technology Career Institute
Community Open House
2075 Las Palmas Dr.
Carlsbad, CA
DR
A
F
T
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 82 of 83
CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Assistant City Manager Patnoe commended the Parks &
Recreation Department and the Finance Department for their work on the presentations.
CITY ATTORNEY COMMENTS: City Attorney McMahon echoed Assistant City Manager Patnoe’s
sentiments.
CITY CLERK COMMENTS: None.
ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Blackburn adjourned the duly noticed meeting at 7:44 p.m.
Tamara R. McMinn, CPMC, CMC
Senior Deputy City Clerk
DR
A
F
T
Nov. 6, 2023 Item #1 Page 83 of 83
From:Evelin Villa-Garcia
To:Traffic; Adrian Salas
Subject:Public Comment: Capital Improvemnt Program Project No.6094
Date:Sunday, November 5, 2023 8:10:30 PM
To the commissioners,
I do not support this project attempting to widen the roads. Traffic congestion isn't a majorissue that should be addressed ahead of other major issues that the city of carlsbad is having.
In fact, it's going to keep increasing indicating success in economic development and jobopportunities. Widening the roads more will cause more people to start driving. Those who
relied on public transit, walking, or bike will now be encouraged to drive. Now you have a tonof more vehicles that are also contributing to air pollution which also affects global warming.
Besides, it's also bad economics. An alternative I suggest is one that I have seen in myhometown designed not only for cars but for public transportation, bicycling, and walking.
Each one can have their own lane, since buses and bikes tend to move slower causing traffic.There wouldn't be as much traffic. Rather than widening the roads I suggest we fix the
potholes instead.
Sincerely,Evelin V.
CAUTION: Do not open attachments or click on links unless you recognize the sender and
know the content is safe.