Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-05-06; Planning Commission; ; SDP 97-17|V 97-03|HDP 97-14|SUP 97-08|/CDP 97-36 - OCEAN ST. CONDOMINIUMS - PALISOUL/BLAIR RESIDENCE.e City of CARLSBAD Planning Departmt A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ItemNo.@ P.C. AGENDA OF: May 6, 1998 Application complete date: November 17, 1997 Project Planner: Elaine Blackbum Project Engineer: Clyde Wickham SUBJECT: SDP 97-17N 97-03/HDP 97-14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 -OCEAN ST. I. CONDOMINIUMS-P ALISOUL/BLAIR RESIDENCE -Request for approval of a Negative Declaration, Site Development Plan, three Variances, a Hillside Development Permit, Special Use Permit, and Coastal Development Permit to develop a two-unit residential condominium on a site located on the West side of Ocean Street between Cypress Avenue and Beech Avenue within Local Facilities Management Zone 1. RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission ADOPT Planning Commission Resolution No. 4262 APPROVING the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director, and ADOPT Planning Commission Resolutions No. 4263, 4264, 4265, 4266, and 4267 APPROVING SDP 97-17, V 97-03, HDP 97-14, SUP 97-08, and CDP 97-36 based upon the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. II. INTRODUCTION The applicant proposes to construct a new two-unit condominium project on a .16-acre bluff-top site located on the West side of Ocean Street between Cypress A venue and Beech A venue. The site is within the appeal area of the Coastal Zone. The applicant has requested three variances for the project. The requested variances are similar to those approved previously on the West side of Ocean Street and can be supported by staff. The project also includes a Minor Condominium Permit (CP, an Administrative Variance (AV), and a Minor Subdivision (MS) to be acted upon by the Planning Director and/or the City Engineer following any Planning Commission decisions on the public hearing permit items. With the exception of the noted variances, the project complies with all applicable City regulations and staff supports the project. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND The applicant has requested approval of several permits to allow construction of two new condominium units on a site on the West side of Ocean Street between Cypress Avenue and Beech A venue. The project application includes a Site Development Plan (SDP), Hillside SDP 97-17N 97-03/HDP --14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 • OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pa e2 Development Permit (HDP), three variances, a Special Use Permit (SUP), and a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) to be acted upon by the Planning Commission. The project site is an in-fill site located on the West side of Ocean Street. The site consists of two narrow rectangular lots, each 3,500 square feet, which are being combined into a single 7,000-square foot (.16-acre) lot for the proposed development. The site slopes downward from East to West (toward the beach). The eastern portion of the site (along Ocean Street) contains slopes of O -15% for approximately the first 35'. From that point westward the site drops more steeply toward the beach. This topography makes the site difficult to develop. The site is one of only a few remaining undeveloped parcels in the area. It contains mainly ice plant and a small amount of other non-native plant species. There is no significant vegetation on the site. The site is zoned R-3_ and is within the Beach Area Overlay Zone. It has a General Plan designation of RH (Residential -High Density). Surrounding properties to the Nmih and South are also zoned R-3 and also have an RH General Plan designation. The properties to the East (across Ocean Street) are zoned R-3 but have a General Plan designation of RMH (Medium to High density). Surrounding properties have already been developed with a variety of residential uses, including some older single family units and mostly newer multi-unit projects. Many of the surrounding projects (on the West side of Ocean Street) faced similar topographic difficulties not shared by other lots in the surrounding R-3 zone and have been developed through the approval of numerous variances. (Attachment "A" is a list of the previously approved variances along Ocean Street. The applicant is proposing to develop a two-unit residential condominium project on the subject site. Two existing substandard (25' x 140') legal lots are being combined into one lot. The proposed condominium units will contain approximately 3000 square feet each. The structure incorporates a varied facade which will be finished in stucco in shades of cream and beige and a clay tile roof. The proposed structure appears to be compatible with sunounding development. The applicant has requested variances for: 1) a reduced front yard setback, 2) additional building height for the western p01iion of the structure, and 3) several deviations from the standard parking (garage dimensions and design) requirements. These are discussed in detail in Section C of this report. Staff is recommending that the necessary findings for the requested variances can be made and that the project all other applicable regulations. IV. ANALYSIS The project is subject to the following regulations and requirements: A. General Plan R-H (Residential -High Density) designation regulations; SDP 97-17/V 97-03/HDP .14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 • OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pae 3 B. Beach Area Overlay Zone, R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) Zone, and Condominium Permit (Planned Unit Development) regulations (Chapters 21.82, 21.16, and 21.45 respectively of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); C. Variance regulations (Chapter 21.50 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); D. Administrative Variance regulations (Chapter 21.51 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); E. Hillside Development Permit regulations (Chapter 21.95 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); F. Special Use Permit (Floodplain Management) regulations (Chapter 21.110 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); G. Coastal Development regulations for the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Chapters 21.201 and 21.204 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); H. Inclusionary Housing requirements (Chapter 21.85 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); I. Growth Management regulations (Chapter 21.90 of the Carlsbad Municipal Code); and, J. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) regulations. The recommendation for approval for this project was developed by analyzing the project's consistency with the applicable City regulations and policies. The project's compliance with each of the above regulations is discussed in detail in the sections below. A. General Plan The proposed project is consistent with the policies and programs of the General Plan. The property has a General Plan designation of RH (Residential -High Density). The RH designation allows the development of multi-family residential units at a density of 15 -23 dwelling units per acre. The growth control point is 19 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project involves two condominium units being developed on a combined 7,000 square foot (.16- acre) lot. Development at the growth control point would allow 2.09 units on the property. The proposed project is for two condominium units at a density of 18 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the land use type (residential) and density regulations for the property. SDP 97-17N 97-03/HDP ~'14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 • OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pa e4 B. Beach Area Overlay Zone/R-3 Zoning/Condominium (Planned Unit Development) The proposed project is subject to the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) regulations, the R-3 Zone regulations, and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) regulations. (The PUD regulations are the development standards for condominium projects.) Projects located within the Beach Area Overlay Zone (BAOZ) require the processing of a Site Development Plan (SDP) to ensure consistency with the BAOZ standards. The BAOZ is intended to supplement the underlying zoning by providing additional development regulations to ensure that proposed development is compatible with existing surrounding uses and that adequate parking and public facilities are provided. The proposed project design provides enough parking to satisfy the BAOZ requirements. A variance has been requested for the dimensions/layout of the parking. The proposed building height is also the subject of a variance request. The structure complies with the BAOZ regulations for building height (as measured in feet) from the street side, but exceeds the allowed height by 2'6" on the western portion of the site. The structure contains a "mezzanine" area within the second level. Since this internal mezzanine area is not a fully open loft, it must be considered a "story". Consequently, the project exceeds the allowed story height (2 stories) on both the street and beach sides. Therefore, the requested height variance is for an additional story and for an additional 2' 6" on the western portion of the structure. The variances requested for parking dimensions/layout and building height are discussed in Section C of this report. The proposed two-unit condominium project is also subject to the regulations of the R-3 Zone and the PUD ( condominium standards) regulations. (The Condominium Permit is a Minor CP which will be acted upon by the Planning Director subsequent to the Planning Commission's actions on the SDP, Variances, HDP, SUP and CDP.) The project complies with the PUD lot size and coverage regulations and all requirements for storage areas and recreational areas. It also provides a sufficient number of resident and guest parking spaces. Table B (below) illustrates how the project complies with the BAOZ, R-3 zoning, and PUD development regulations except for those items for which variances have been requested. (The variance items are discussed in Section C of this report.) Table B: BAOZ, R-3 ZONING, AND PUD (CONDOMINIUM) STANDARDS COMPLIANCE PERMITTED/ STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED Min. Lot Size (PUD) 3,500 sf 7,000 sf Max. Lot Coverage (R-3) 60% 37% Min. Front Setback (PUD) 20' (public st) O' measured from row (See Variance discussion.) SDP 97-17N 97-03/HDP 9'14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 • OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pae 5 Min. Side Setback (PUD) 5' 5' -South side 3' -North side (See Variance discussion.) Max. Building Height (BAOZ) 30' /2 stories 29'6"/3 stories (E elev.) 32'6"/3 stories (W elev.) Resident Parking (PUD) 4 covered spaces 4 covered spaces (2 full-sized covered spaces/du) (See Variance discussion.) Visitor Parking (PUD) 1 space 1 space (I sp/2 du) (See Variance discussion.) Storage Space (PUD) 480 cf/du 2240 cf (1120 cf/du) Recreational Space (PUD) Total: 400 sf (200 sf/du) Total: 4050 sf 1. Private 1. variable 2025 sf 2. Common 2. variable 2025 sf C. Variances The applicant is requesting three variances for this project: 1) a reduced front yard setback, 2) increased building height, and 3) several deviations from 'the standard parking (garage dimensions and design) requirements. Each of the requested variances is discussed individually in the paragraphs below. In addition, Table C "Variance Findings" contains detailed responses to each of the required findings. 1. Front Yard The applicant is requesting a reduction in the required front yard setback. The R-3 Zone requires a 20' front yard setback. The applicant has proposed a 5' front yard setback which would be reduced to O' because of the City's requirement for dedication of 5' of front yard for future street improvements. Other projects on the West side of Ocean Street have been approved with front yards reduced to O' because of site topography and the City's street dedication requirement. An Engineering standards variance (which would be approved by the City Engineer) is also required because the driveway exceeds 40% of the lot width. Staff believes that the necessary findings can be made for the approval of this variance request. 2. Building Height The applicant is requesting a building height variance to allow additional height for the proposed structure. The maximum allowed building height for the site is 30' /2 stories (with a 3/12 roof pitch). The proposed structure has a maximum height of 29'6" on the eastern (street) side of the property and 32'6" on the western portion. Thus the project would require a height variance of 2' 6" for the western portion (beach side) of the structure. A height variance would also be required for an additional story for both the eastern and western portions. This is due to the fact SDP 97-17N 97-03/HDP 9'14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 • OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pae 6 that the structure includes an interior "mezzanine" or "loft" area which must be counted as a story. The City's Municipal Code ("story" definition) states that mezzanines or lofts do not count as a story provided that they do not exceed 50% of the floor area of the story in which they are located. The proposed project mezzanine meets this requirement in that it occupies only 38% of the story in which it is located. However, a mezzanine or loft is generally considered to be fully or mostly open to the floor in which it is located. The mezzanine proposed is fully enclosed (separated) from the proposed second level. In such cases, where the loft is enclosed, the Planning Director has determined that the mezzanine/loft would count as a separate story. Therefore, the proposed project would contain three stories, thus requiring a one-story height vanance. 3. Parking Dimensions/Layout The applicant is requesting three deviations from the standards related to the parking. a. The first is to allow a tandem two-car garage for Unit A (rather than the standard side-by-side design). b. The second is to allow non-standard interior dimensions for both garages. The City's standard 20' x 20' side-by-side garage provides a total of 400 square feet of interior space. The proposed garage for Unit A (tandem) would be 11' wide and 36' deep and would provide a total of 396 square feet of interior space. The garage for Unit B would be 22 '4" wide and 18' deep and would contain slightly over 400 square feet of space. c. The third is to allow the required guest parking space to be compact sized (8 ½' x 15 ') rather than full sized. The condominium development standards allow up to 45% of required visitor parking to be compact. Since this project requires only one guest parking space the project would include 100% compact guest parking. Table C: VARIAN CE FINDINGS FINDING JUSTIFICATION There are exceptional or Generally: The exceptional conditions applicable to the extraordinary circumstances or subject property which do not apply generally to other conditions applicable to the property in the same vicinity and zone are the topographic subject property or intended use conditions and lot size/dimensions. The subject property which do not apply generally to consists of 2 substandard lots ( each 25' wide) both of which other property or uses in the same contain steep slopes and a very small pad area vicinity and zone. (approximately 45' deep). The applicants could develop each lot separately with one unit each. However, to do so would result in two separate residences which would be SDP 97-l 7N 97-03/HDP '-14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 - OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pae 7 even more unable to meet City development standards (e.g., a 20'x20' garage for each unit) and thus would still require numerous variances. By combining the two lots into a single lot/2-unit condominium, the project is better able to satisfy City requirements and requires fewer variances than would otherwise be necessary. Front Yard: The site's sloping topography and narrow width limit automobile access to the eastern (street side) portion of the site which makes it impossible (without a large amount of fill) to provide a street level garage without encroachment into the required front yard setback. While this condition exists on some other lots in the area ( on the beach side of this portion of Ocean Street), it does not exist generally for the properties in the area as this R-3 zone includes many properties which are not beach front and do not have these topographic conditions. Building Height: The site's sloping topography on much of the site (the eastern 1/3) makes it difficult (without a large amount of fill) to design reasonably livable levels within the structure as it steps down the hillside while meeting standard building height requirements. While this condition exists on some other lots in the area ( on the beach side of this portion of Ocean Street), it does not exist generally for the properties in the area as this R-3 zone includes many properties which are not beach front and do not have these topographic conditions. Parking Dimensions/Layout: The site's sloping topography and narrow lot width (50') make providing required parking at City standards (two 20'x20' garages and one 10' wide guest parking space) impossible without approval of a variance for reduced side yards and/or tandem parking with reduced garage dimensions and a compact- sized guest parking space. While this condition exists on some other lots in the area ( on the beach side of this portion of Ocean Street), it does not exist generally for the properties in the area as this R-3 zone includes many properties which are not beach front and do not have these topographic conditions. The variance is necessary for the Front Yard: Without approval of a variance for a reduced preservation and enjoyment of a front yard setback, the applicant could not construct the two substantial property right lmits allowed by the General Plan on the site because the possessed by other property in the narrow lot width and topographical constraints made the SDP 97-17N 97-03/HDP .14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 • OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pae 8 same vicinity and zone but which 1s denied to the property m question. The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity and zone. construction of a standard garage and parking arrangement at street level impossible. This is due to the fact that the portion of the lot which is at street level is only about 45' deep. Therefore, the requested variance is necessary for the preservation of the substantial property right to construct two units, which is within the density allowed by the General Plan on this parcel and which is a right possessed by other property owners on Ocean Street. Building Height: Without approval of a variance for increased building height, the applicant would be required to substantially reduce the scale of the project to such a degree that it would not be possible to develop livable units compatible with existing units in the area. Other property owners along the West side of Ocean Street have enjoyed the right to construct similar-scale projects. Therefore, the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a development of similar size and scale to other approved projects on the West side of Ocean Street, which is a right possessed by other owners on Ocean Street, but which is denied to this property owner. Parking Dimensions/Layout: Without the approval of a variance for tandem parking with reduced dimensions and a compact-sized guest parking space, the applicant could not construct the allowed two units with their associated required parking on the site, which has a General Plan designation of RH and permits 2.09 dwelling units on this .11-acre site. The property owner would be denied a substantial property right (to construct the number of units allowed by the General Plan) which is possessed by other property owners on Ocean Street who have been previously granted approval of similar projects. Front Yard, Building Height, Parking Dimensions/ Layout: The requested variances for a reduced setback, increased building height, and non-standard parking dimensions/layout and a compact-sized guest space will not be detrimental to the public welfare in that the geotechnical study prepared for the site concludes that the proposed project will not endanger the proposed or existing smTounding projects or slopes, and the project front setback, height, and parking arrangements are similar to and compatible with surrounding development, and the project is similar in intensity and scale to surrounding developments. SDP 97-l 7N 97-03/HDP .14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 - OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pae 9 The granting of the variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. D. Administrative Variance Front Yard, Building Height, Parking Dimensions/ Layout: Granting of the variances requested will not adversely affect the General Plan because the proposal, with the variances, remains consistent with the General Plan. The site is designated by the General Plan for Residential- High Density uses. The use proposed is a residential use which is within the allowed density range and is at or below the growth control point. The applicant is requesting an administrative variance to reduce one side yard setback. The R-3 Zone requires minimum 5' side yards (10% of the lot width). The proposed project requires 5' side yar.ds. The applicant is requesting a 3' side yard on the North side of the property. (The side yard on the South side is shown at 5'.) As with the front setback request (above), other projects on the West side of Ocean Street have been approved with reduced side yards. The topography of those lots make it difficult to develop a reasonably-sized structure while complying with all of the standard setback requirements. Because the amount of the requested yard setback reduction does not exceed 75% of the required yard requirement, this request constitutes an Administrative Variance which will be acted upon by the Planning Director subsequent to any Planning Commission actions on the Site Development Plan, Variances, Hillside Development Permit, Special Use Permit and Coastal Development Permit. E. Hillside Development Permit (HDP) A Hillside Development Permit (HDP) is required for the proposed project because the site contains a slope of 15% or greater and an elevational difference of greater than 15 feet. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of the Hillside Development Ordinance. The project grading involves 600 cubic yards of cut and 300 cubic yards of fill. The total grading volume (3,750 c.y./ac.) is well within the amount deemed acceptable in the hillside regulations. The site slopes downward from East to West, with slopes of 25 -40% located in the middle portion of the site. The project has been designed to minimize the visual impacts of the project as seen from Ocean Street. Table E (below) summarizes the requirements of the hillside regulations and the compliance of the project with those regulations. Table E: HILLSIDE ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE " PERMITTED/ STANDARD REQUIRED PROVIDED Max. slope height 30' n/a SDP 97-l 7N 97-03/HDP ,14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 - OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -PALISOUL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pa e 10 Grading volume 0 -7,999 c.y./ac. 3,750 c.y./ac. Contour grading Varied slope directions & The property width is only 50', undulation. and the grading is limited to the area of development. Roadway design Per site contours. n/a Hillside Architecture Use terraced pads and/or The proposed structure is terraced foundations. down the hillside, and the building Decrease building mass with mass IS reduced as seen from increased slope steepness. Ocean Street. F. Special Use Permit (SUP) Projects located within any area of special flood hazards must obtain approval of Special Use Permit (SUP) by the floodplain administrator (the City Planning Commission). The intent of these regulations is to promote the public health, safety, and welfare and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions. The proposed project site is located within a special flood area (the "Coastal High Hazard Area"). The City's Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has concluded that it satisfies all of the applicable floodplain regulations. All of the new construction being proposed is located on the landward side of the reach of the mean high tide line, and the geotechnical study submitted for the project adequately identifies and addresses any impacts the project might have on adjacent properties and structures. G. Coastal Development Permit (CDP) The project site is located within the appeal area of the Coastal Zone and within the Mello II segment of the Local Coastal Program (LCP). The site is also within the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.203) and the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone (Chapter 21.204) of the Carlsbad Municipal Code. 1. Appeal Area The appeal area of the Coastal Zone is located generally at the greater distance of either a) between the sea and the first public roadway paralleling the sea, or b) within 300 feet of the inland tide extent of any beach or the mean high tide line where there is no beach. In the appeal area approval of a Coastal Development Permit can be appealed to the California Coastal Commission. SDP 97-17N 97-03/HDP '-14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 - OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pa e 11 2. Mello II Segment The proposed project is consistent with the Mello II segment of the LCP which contains land use policies for development and conservation of coastal land and water areas within the Segment boundaries. The project site is designated for RH (Residential -High Density) development and is being developed consistent with that designation. A geotechnical report was prepared in conformance with the Mello II Segment requirements. This report determined that the proposed development will have a useable life span of at least 50 years and that the development will have no adverse effect on the stability of the coastal slope. In addition, the proposed structure, decks, fences, and seawall all comply with the identified "stringline" for such uses to the North and South. 3. Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone The Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone is intended to supplement the underlying zone by providing additional resource protection regulations within designated areas to preserve, protect, and enhance the habitat resource value of lagoons and sloping hillsides. This overlay zone provides that steep slope areas (25% or greater slopes) not containing endangered plant/animal species or coastal sage scrub and chaparral plant communities may be permitted subject to specific findings. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of the Coastal Resource Protection Overlay Zone as discussed in Table G 1 below, and staff recommends that the necessary findings can be made. Table Gl: COASTAL RESOURCE PROTECTION OVERLAY ZONE FINDING PROPOSED That a soils investigation be conducted to A geotechnical analysis of the project site was determine that the site slope areas are stable prepared. The analysis concluded that the and that grading/ development impacts are proposed development will have a useful life of mitigable for at least 75 years or the life of the at least 50 years and that the development will structure. have no adverse effect on the stability of the coastal slope. That grading of the slope is essential to the The proposed grading IS essential to the development of the site. development of the site since the steep slopes are located in the middle of the property less than 50' from the eastern property line. That slope disturbance will not result m The proposed slope disturbance will not substantial damage or alteration to major damage or alter major wildlife habitat or native wildlife habitat or native vegetation. vegetation smce the site IS an infill site containing no native vegetation. For projects of 10 acres or less in size and The project site is not predominated by steep which are predominated by steep slopes, that slopes and the site does not serve as a wildlife SDP 97-17N 97-03/HDP t14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 - OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pae 12 grading may be allowed only if no interruption corridor. of significant wildlife corridors occurs. No grading of steep slope areas will be n/a permitted unless all environmental impacts Review of the proposed project has concluded have been mitigated. that the site contains no habitat or wildlife and that no environmental impacts will result from the project. 4. Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone The intent and purpose of the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone is to control development/land use along the coastline to protect the public's interest in maintaining the shoreline as a recreational and scenic resource, promoting public safety and access, and avoiding adverse geologic and economic effect of bluff erosion. The proposed project complies with all applicable requirements of the Coastal Shoreline Development Overlay Zone as discussed in Table G2 below. Table G2: COASTAL SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE STANDARD PROPOSED Lateral Access: Provide public access to The project is conditioned to dedicate land minimum 25' of dry sandy beach. westward of the proposed sea wall for public access. Bluff Top Access: Applies to lots where no n/a beach IS present or where beach IS not Beach is present and is accessible within 300' accessible. via existing stairways located at several locations along Ocean Street. Vertical Access: Determine the public need to Vertical access exists within 300' of the gain access, the constraints to accessing the project. The site is not now, and has not beach, and the privacy needs of the property historically, been used for vertical access. No owner. vertical access IS warranted for this development based upon the ordinance criteria. Geotechnical Report: Analyze cliff erosion A geotechnical analysis of the project site was and geologic conditions. prepared. The analysis concluded that the proposed development will have a useful life of at least 5 0 years and that the development will have no adverse effect on the stability of the coastal slope. Appearance: Buildings with a generally The proposed residential structure has been attractive appearance related to the surrounding designed with attractive architectural features SDP 97-17N 97-03/HDP '-14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 - OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISO UL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pae 13 development and the natural environment. which will be compatible with the surrounding development and natural environment. Ocean Views: Buildings designed to preserve The project has been designed with a low-scale ocean views to the extent possible. (29'6" high) building facade on Ocean Street and complies with applicable side yard requirements which will, to the extent feasible, preserve existing ocean views from the street. Natural Features: Retain natural features and The project has been designed with a low- topography to the extent possible. (29'6" high) facade along Ocean Street, and the structure steps down the hillside to the West with the downward slope of the site. Grading: Grading executed so as to blend with The project grading is designed to blend with the existing terrain. existing and natural surroundings to the extent feasible. Stringline: The project adheres to all coastal stringline setback requirements for the placement of structures, decks, fences and sea wall. H. Inclusionary Housing The City's Inclusionary Housing regulations require that a minimum of 15% of all approved units in any residential specific plan or qualified subdivision be made affordable to lower income households. The inclusionary housing requirement for this project would be 0.3 dwelling units. However, residential projects involving six or fewer dwelling units may satisfy their lower income inclusionary housing requirement by paying an in-lieu fee or other in-lieu contribution. Therefore, this project has been conditioned to pay an in-lieu fee equivalent to the inclusionary requirement for the project (0.3 dwelling units). I. Growth Management The proposed project is located within Local Facilities Management Zone 1 in the Northwest quadrant of the City. The impacts on public facilities created by the project, and its compliance with the adopted performance standards, are summarized in Table I below. Table I: GROWTH MANAGEMENT STANDARD IMPACTS COMPLIANCE City Administration 6.95 sf Yes Library 3.71 sf Yes SDP 97-l7N 97-03/HDP '-14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 - OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS -P ALISOUL/BLAIR RESIDENCE May 6, 1998 Pae 14 STANDARD IMPACTS Waste Water Treatment 2EDU Parks .01 ac Drainage n/a Circulation 16 ADT Fire Station No's 1 & 3 Open Space n/a Schools CUSD Sewer Collection System 2EDU Water 440 GPD COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes The project is .09 dwelling units below the Growth Management Dwelling Unit allowance of 2.09 dwelling units for the subject property. V. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The environmental review for this proposed project relied upon the City's General Plan Update Master EIR (MEIR 93-01) for analysis of cumulative air quality and traffic impacts. Based upon the initial study and field review conducted by staff, the Planning Director has determined that no significant environmental impacts will result from the proposed project and has, therefore, issued a Negative Declaration on February 26, 1998. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4262 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4263 3. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4264 4. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4265 5. Planning Commission Resolution No. 4266 6. Plam1ing Commission Resolution No. 4267 7. Exhibit "A" 8. Location Map 9. Background Data Sheet 10. Local Facilities Impact Assessment Form 11. Disclosure Statement 12. Reduced Exhiqits 13. Full Size E1Rhibits "A" -"G" dated May 6, 1998 EB:mh STREET ADDRESS 2459 2479 2489 2601 2609/2613 2617 2617 2623 2641/2643 2650 (East side) 2651 2677/2679 2687 2729 2731 2747 2775 • PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCES ON OCEAN STREET PROJECT ACTION NUMBER V ARIANCE(S) DATE V276 1) side yard from 7' 6" to 5' for garage 3/8/78 (PC) V332 1) front yard from 20' to 17'5" 3/10/82 (PC) 2) side yards from 7' 5" to 5' (both sides) 3) garages: a) 2 4-car tandem garages b) reduced interior dimensions (9' wide) V 179 1) North side yard from 7'6" to 5' (for garage) 2/13/68 (PC) V205 1) front yard from 10' to5' 5/25/71 (PC) V 96-01 1) front yard from 20' to 0' (after 5' ded.) 5/7/97 (PC) 2) garage: a) tandem b) reduced dimensions (10-12' wide) V 150 1) parking: 10/26/65 (PC) a) stall space from 200sf to 174 sf b) parking space within front & side setbacks AV 93-05 1) front yard from 20' to 5' 3/23/94 (PD) 2) side yard from 5' to 3' 3) side yard from 5' to 2' for uncovered parking V 86-07 1) front yard from 20' to 0' 8/15/86 2) side yard from 5' to 3' 3) bldg depth to 66'6" 4) garage dimension of 19' V373 I) tandem parking 6/24/86 (CC) 2) compact guest parking Also: Engrg standards variance for driveway cut V 129 1) front yard from 16' to 10' 11/12/63 (PC) 2) side yard intrusion from 2' to 3' for stairway V91 1) front yard from 20' to 0' (lots 21 & 22) 9/14/61 2) side yard from 5' to 3' (PC) V375 1) front yard from 20' to 0' (after 5' ded.) 9/17/86 2) 3-car garage w/2 uncovered spaces 3 ) open parking spaces in side yard setbacks Also: Engrg standards variance for driveway at 40% of lot frontage V 197 1) front yard from 20' to 5' 1/27/70 (PC) 2) side yards from 10' to 5' (both sides) 3) rear yard from 20' to 5' 4) 60% lot coverage V90 1) front yard from 20' to 6' 8/22/61 (PC) V233 1) front yard from 6' (existing) to 0' 9/10/74 (PC) V76 1) side yard from 5' to 2' 9/27 /60 (PC) V 143 I) front yard from 20' to 5' 12/8/64 (PC) 2) side yards from 10' to 5' (both sides) 3) rear yard from 20' to 5' Exhibit "A" May 6, 1998 STREET PROJECT -ACTION ADDRESS NUMBER V ARIANCE(S) DATE 2775 V 177 1) front yard from 20' to 5' 11/14/67 (PC) 2) side yard from 10' to 5' (both sides) 3) rear yard from 20' to 5' 4) allow parking on property across Ocean St. 2795 V 301 1) front yard from 8' to 4' from row 3/26/80 (PC) 2) N side yard from 1 0' to 7' 3) add'! ht from 35' to 40' (beach side) measured from top of slab to top of plate 2805 V47 1) front yard from 20' to 5' 2/10/59 (PC) 2) side yard from 6' to 3' 2805 V 174 1) front yard from 20' to 5' 11/21/67 (PC) 2) N side yard a) from 6' to 3' for main structure b) from 6' to 0' for garage 3) S side yard from 6' to 4' 2895 1) front yard from 20' to 5' 2) rear yard from 15' to 10' 3) side yards from 5' to 3' (both sides) 4) 60% lot coverage 2895 V200 1) side yard from 3' to 0' l" ( for garage) 7 /28/70 (PC) 2901 V204 1) add'! fence height from 42" to 6' in front yard 4/13/71 (PC) 2901-V 90-02 1) side yards from 10' to 6' (both sides) 10/17 /90 (PC) 2) bldg ht a) from 25' to 47'6" b) from 2 stories to 4 stories 2955 V222 1) front yard from 20' to 5' 2) rear yard from 20' to 5' 2977 V13 1) front yard from 20' to 5' 8/15/57 (PC) 2) N side yard from 7'6" to 5' 3) S side yard from 7' 6" to 2' 6" 3021 V92 1) side yard from 5'2" to 2'5" 9/28/61 (PC) 3083/3085 AV 92-07 1) side yard from 5' to 4' IO" 2) side yard from 5' to 3 '4" 3093/3095/3097 V267 1) allow open parking & carports within front and 1/26/77 (PC) both side yard setbacks (reduction of front yard and reduction of side yards (both) from 6' to 2') 3093/3095/3097 V285 1) allow open parking & carports within front and 10/11/78 (PC) side yard setbacks 3100 V 141 1) side yard from 10' to 5' 10/13/64 (PC) 2) side yard from 6'3" to 5' 3) rear yard from 12'6" to 5' 3150 V 148 1) front yard from 15' to 5' gen'ly 8/10/65 (PC) (3120, 3130, 3140, & from 15' to 0' at SE corner & 3150) 2) side yard from 10' to 5' (both sides) 3) rear yard from 12' to 5' * This table does not necessarily include all Administrative Variances which have been approved on Ocean Street. • ~---"'---G _ ____,\ CYPRESS AVE OCEAN ST. CONDO - PALISOUL/BLAIR SOP 97-17/V 97-03/HDP 97-14/ SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 • BACKGROUND DATA SHEET - CASE NO: SDP 97-l 7N 97-03/HDP 97-14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 CASE NAME: Ocean Street Condominiums -Palisoul/Blair Residence APPLICANT: -=C=in=da_._y-=B==l=ai=·r ______________________ _ REQUEST AND LOCATION: West side of Ocean Street between Cypress Avenue and Beech Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 15 and 16 in block "A" Hayes Land Co. Addition to Carlsbad Map No. 2, City of Carlsbad APN: 203-140-11 and 12 Acres: JQ Proposed No. of Lots/Units: =-2-"'un=1=·ts'--------- GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING Land Use Designation: =RH==------------------------ Density Allowed: 19 -23 du/ac Density Proposed:-=1:...=8-=d=u/"-'a=c ________ _ Existing Zone: =R'-"-3'----------Proposed Zone: =n/~a ___________ _ Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: (See attached for information on Carlsbad's Zoning Requirements) Site R-3 North R-3 South R-3 East R-3 West n/a Zoning Land Use undeveloped residential residential residential Pacific Ocean PUBLIC FACILITIES School District: CUSD Water District: CMWD Sewer District: Carlsbad Equivalent Dwelling Units (Sewer Capacity): -=2=--=E=D=-U-=----------------- Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: -=-A=u=g==u=st:....:2=9__,_,-=-1""'-99"-7'--------------- ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ~ Negative Declaration, issued "'""F~eb=r=u=arc...<-y-=2:....:6~, ~19~9~8'---------------- D Certified Environmental Impact Report, dated ______________ _ D Other, ________________________ _ CITY OF CARLSBAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LOCAL FACILITIES IMPACTS ASSESSMENT FORM (To be Submitted with Development Application) PROJECT IDENTITY AND IMP ACT ASSESSMENT: FILE NAME AND NO: OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS-PALISOUL/BLAIR RESIDENCE-SDP 97-17N 97-03/HDP 97-14/SUP 97-08/CDP 97-36 LOCAL FACILITY MANAGEMENT ZONE: l GENERAL PLAN: =RH"'-"--------- ZONING: =R:....::-3'--------------------------- DEVELOPER'S NAME: ...=c.C=in=d..,__y=B""""la=ir=--------------------- ADDRESS: 655 India#321, San Diego, CA 92101 PHONE NO.: (619) 223-2400 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 203-140-11 & 12 QUANTITY OF LAND USE/DEVELOPMENT (AC., SQ. FT., DU): =·1=6...!::!;ac!:'.--_____ _ ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: ________________ _ A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. City Administrative Facilities: Demand in Square Footage= __,,6=.9:...:::5:.._ ___ _ Library: Demand in Square Footage = -"'3:..!c. 7'--"1'------ Wastewater Treatment Capacity (Calculate with J. Sewer) Park: Drainage: Demand in Acreage = Demand in CFS = Identify Drainage Basin = (Identify master plan facilities on site plan) Circulation: Demand in ADT = (Identify Trip Distribution on site plan) Fire: Served by Fire Station No.= Open Space: Acreage Provided = Schools: (Demands to be determined by staff) Sewer: Demands in EDU Identify Sub Basin = (Identify trunk line(s) impacted on site plan) Water: Demand in GPD = 2EDU 0.01 n/a n/a 16 1&3 n/a CUSD 2EDU A 440 L. The project is 0.09 dwelling units the Growth Management Dwelling unit allowance. • • City of Carlsbad ■ 46 10 0 i U~i •24·Si; I, ,t4 hi DISCLOSURE STATEMENT APPLICANT'SSTATEMENTOFDISCLOSUREORCERTAINOWNERSHIPINTERESTSONALLAPPLICATIONS WHICH WILL REQUIRE DISCRETIONARY ACTION ON THE PART OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR ANY APPOINTED BOARD, COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE (Please Print) The following information must be disclosed: 1. Applicant List the names and addresses of all persons having a financial interest in the application. Philip R. Palisoul & Pamela Martin L. Blair & Cynthia 4269 Cosoy Way 655 India #321 San niego,CA 92103 San Diego, CA 921101 2. Owner List _the names and addressees of all person having any ownership interest in the property involved. same as above same as above -;:s 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names and addresses of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. 4. If any person identified pursuant to (1) or (2) above is a non-profit organization or a trust, list the names and addresses of any person serving as officer or director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary of the trust. DISCLOS.FRM 2/96 PAGE 1 of2 2075 Las Palmas Drive • Carlsbad, California 92009-1576 • (619) 438-1161 • Disclosure Statement • (Over) Page 2 5. Have you had more than $250.00 worth of business transacted with any member of City staff. Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes __ No~ If yes, please indicate person(s) ________________ _ Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant DISCLOS.FRM 2/96 PAGE 1 of 2 5. Have you had m.han $250 worth of business tran.ed with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and/or Council within the past twelve (12) months? D Yes D No If yes, please indicate person(s): ___________ _ Person is defined as "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city municipality, district or other political subdivision or any other group or combination acting as a unit." M::£:ch Ldia::s i~7;:s;;; ~ s. ~ ~1zqq1 Signature of owner/date Signature of applicant/date MAR.ti IV ~. BLJC\ 1\'2... <o/2.f,Jc,7 ~~71-\IA ?. 0.A\'2-~26/t::f.7 Print or type name of owner Print or type name of applicant Disclosure Statement 1 0/96 Page 2 of 2 - .-ii ,, ,,,,,,,,,, I -----.:.---J-----------------~,...._________ '---! I • '"" /: ./' 0 ,l:: ~ ' ' I' "' ?"'?' -✓- _p-t' j"' c=rn"O"IWT::::::::-,, ~ Jf' ~ _ ~~~ -;z-fJCfAN jL-STR££,'j_ ___ , __ -/'-,--Y-J-_ -:,,~ M.S. C.P. SHEET 1 !11.::&_ ~ OF 2 SHEETS S.D.P. 97-17 H.D.P. 97-14 S.U.P. 97-08 C.D.P. 97-36 A.V. 97-07 v. 97-03 • ~ ~ ;~I • ~ <, <, = ;;:,o -_., ">. r, 1 01 '-> 01 • 01 ' "' ~ .,!!!~1-:~· f ___ ~.~~_§, _ __f_y_ _ff_ ___ f1--L ________ l ,=,_':i_/_ 1 TENT~TIVE PABCEL MAP ~ '~ • . .-.· .. Vi'!"~"-•:4,_••1-:. ,.l~,~\. \ \\ 1\\\\\\\\\\1\l: __ )t" -........... ~-,L ______ f_ AND f\_\/~/:: :_\;:/·._._ ! 1~~-. . # b'r~DEVELOPMENT PLAN ~ "'ef)"l"-.. -,, r_ r-.,.., lffl 'ffi.:..::... -~, _::_;· .:..:::.: 71·· ;;'-, "',-~~ :-.;,: / •. ,_-_,",c:'·.,•::·;' •.· -·· , •. ,,.~--FOR ta~ ' ., " ,, " " , " " "j . ..... . i . -i. • •• r '. ~ 3.DnTDI£ ' \ '-.J ~I .,._ •\,· .... ·.•• \\\\\ \\\\\\~_.,---•••• • ----§! ,..,.,.,,""""= 1•::•->t· .::-:.-·o· CEAN STREET •i A ~-••HHF:• "t::f 1'-··', ... I •• ~~=.;,~N •• ·-·.· •• • CONDOMINIUMS !;::: (:: N f N ~j ,, ,,_ u 10.r £,I~~ n ~-= = =-«ii;;--'-M n ... ( • r v i ii~~ l--. Cl ..., l I • ~~ ~ ~ ;;~ ,. h ill ,_ <:\ ..., I I I I ~ ·:.• "' SClrt.I:f' •10' SQlflC£ Of 1rJPQC8APlff ~SH<M#OITJ£SCl'tNISMS'Cl1£'NTCIJIY~ StMIO'IIC1HXJSIJIOll~&Al1£JOON....,..2Z IIIJ'ln' onir &1)$(~ .c. lEGIJ. lJ£SCf/FT1QN ,ors 1'MtO 111111..a:x ~...-Cl'HCrtSLMl)a:::uMiW .GlfOI IID ~--M1 3 ~ 10 MP 1221. QME8 /APPW.NT TYPICA!, SECTION -OCEAN STR££T - t "'"'"' em' or OCLANSIOE " PACIRC oa:•• VICINITY NOSC«E ©1997 O'Doy Consultants, Inc. ,,. '\ I i I I it r t L Sl~DZ-1'1 ,...,_.., ""'"" f£ACH "'"' ~ .;;1 ~ J111mn. 1110sa n l410SC.n. Jtl6 son. _,.n DIJHJ.IICXl,ro/AC• 16/J.U. QQJJ7 IIC,/'2 • 0.0168 ¥ IKXl/-"C • (l.Jl l).U. a1or£ "1Dll'AC "" "" 1.$10.U. PACIFIC OCEAN .-NOT£: na»NSUWallUEW IMPNO 06QlXQJIIF FWttl.!IICl'1)lS ~TQ),»C ti 1111 ~10,,t•A("a,,o I I BENCHMARK; OESCl!JPiO't STNO«l DSC I LOCAl'OI: o~ 11 QTIM£ST or MtRSCtroN or tAAlS&IOEl.'ltltlt[UIST.0.lllNOliTlf or!Jl!CICE~Nltn.EASJ Ol't/Lorlfl.lOCSATS'MTOl!!OX.lOCATDI 1tCXIIC.MS£c,IIIISlll10ll!OISO,W.. RtCOl!OfROlt-Klf!MO)Jl(TY'fOITClrlCONTI!tl.MtA 80Cl(.PJrGE1'6N)0C0l!6 [lf';An:,tt ~II.SL ,j """""""' ,;u,rasor.,., SNl~Ol.11101 GENERAi. NOTES: """""""""' ASS£SSOR'SPMCELHVM9ERS ,m:,o,(N;< CXISlH. ZCIC IHJ lNC> USE """"'-""' PROP050> ,_ US[ T0TAL.8lll.D9tG-aM;RAGE: BUtDIHQ SOUNI£ f'OOT,a( """""'"""""""' ·-'"""""'/PIIOPOO<D OPEN""°' DOISIIY(/UDolD) PIIOPOsmDD<SIY l>tYE1.0PAIU $11[ _,, 2653-2ea5 OCEAN STitar ~.CA92000-22311 203-140-11 II: 12 0.11 ACRES 111:3 -B£AOt Nf£A CM.:RIAY DOS1Hl IJNOMU)PQ) I.OT ,., lt3-8£AOtNtEA.0'1ER!.AY TWO CC1NDOW«M DlffJ,J.LH; UNTS 2'79/7000 S.I'. • 37X UMITA-3121$.I'. lNT ■-4lt!)SF. 2 ~ACCS POt \.NT X 2 • 4 1 YtSIT0R SPACE PDI 2 \H1S • 1 =; ~~: =: ~30s::r. PATIO 11: SAND 1£,tQ,f -202' s.F. ,. UNO'S/JOIE (0.11 N; X ,. • 2.01 LNJS)(18 00/l<C) 2 IN1S POtZOl'INCCJROl<WrCE21~.250 CUBIC f'OOTAClt Of SlOIWJE SPACE 2240 C.U. AvrN«. Ml.T TlWTIC ---SCHOOi. oosn,cr .. ,,. """"" SOD! "'5TIOCT NUlilBEll:Of'LOTS 01" IH1S ..__.Ol"lDIS ,. 2.0' cur 100 a. Al. JOO er. CMt,S&lr,0 UHIAtD SCHOOi. DIST10CT" CNtl.S8AD Ml,NOFW. ..,.TDt DISTRICT cnYOl"- 2 casnNC ........ ,..,,., R!ilSfll'OiA)A!_ .1-...,,c,..,~I"""""' ... --'-'--.,.,., -"""-JilL_ Vt:,/, ~rr-...1.&__SCAL.t.~ CONSULT NT 5. ~CJ ~.108 lo!O-~ =--Cow(--~ ...... 0:-C---nool ..._ .. ~:== s.,._ ;\...CiS\'i110\J\'i71JS"O\ ♦-i-M ZCZQ ~tSI Jlltf'971lSJ>,'J7ll1P~IM!OMC CMWD 96-XXX © 1997 O'Ocy Consultants, Inc. ~ ~ ~ --~ ~ ~ l:J ~ ~ ~ i It ~ '-' '-' ~ ~ ~ 20.0IJ' ,----------::::-1~00· un ,,,,, ,,.,...-I -,,,,, I I J • .,.,..,.,wal -40 1.Nf:ISA!DIDIT -- (XJST. CIIO<JNO __) ·?, ~1-20 --...:: ...... "',. PROPOSED CIIO<JNO ,_.,,_ -0 CROSS SECTION A-A NOit: FOIi CROSS SECTION: HO/lfZONTAL: I z 20' ',fl/TICA/.: I z 20• BENCHMARK: :£~1'10f,tST~OISC .»rot (Ut,IIIORnfllEST~M!UiSCtnOltrl CNl!.sa,t,011,',0,tW,Sf.0I t.tltQlf!H rl:!FtiU~l!lfifTEJSt t$C/lrlTllJrOGA1S'MftMOOX.lOCATEI) WCOIC.8,l&DIIIIRSIIIIOll!01SlQW.. ~~ FRClt-tiOltM CO>m' VOO'C.11.. CCtITTIQ. 0,1,1.1. 90()(.P,G(, IJSICl.OC:01~ ~,ll'O(; 2Q°""IISJ. M.S. C.P. SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS 'l7-lt. S.D.P. 97-17 _!J_f-Pi~--•=0.-S" H.D.P. 97-1 4 S.U.P. 97-08 C.D.P. 97-36 A.V. 97-07 V. 97-03 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN . FOR OCEAN STREET CONDOMINIUMS 9 - ~"'~~ 0 /<,..~ """""'" ........__ """'-""-""-u Olt,\-n=....:l.&....-SCOl£:: ~ CQNSULr NTS P'tOJ(CfYC11.~J0aN0-1Z:::lfil_ ~-::J:-::E =---D<CIM(tlt "-.QI!!(: JIQ.u,-nco s.,,..._ , ... no-.u•--a:~_0-0,.f ~ llOI♦ I f•\,..OBS\971013\9713SP02 4-2-9B 2•23r29 pr, EST ~ 01~ EXISTING 3 STORY BLDG. V/ BASEMEN I l [XISJING f!K EXISTING I STORY BLDG. \JI BASEMENT ~ ~iq .. ~~! i • 5T[PP~ "''°"'' ---1' ~-°" CCJ,ICft(f[ RfrA1NIHG ' ~ •LL w/ \flOCO SLAT Tit[LLISfOICC. ""-" 1• ABOV[ AOJAC[NlUUC[ PROPOSE BLDG. V l(ACH ~--------S(A*LL Stll1NCLINE ,--------SUlfl ,iPAOTltUSICN SlllllotCLIN( ~-------ST[Pf'CO PLAHJER Sf'[CIAt. FINISH S[A"'t.L lflf L._ 0£0< sr••HOL)l't -L""". ~~"''l:t=...'.':::::. ,,.;;;;. ;(.;,;; r-7/"~~.S•.x,, 'K,-.'o r1aCP1, / / "/ / ----$TP,P[00_,KlAINIHG: -.,.ll W,./" ~t~~l~l QIAQ[ EXISTING DECK XISTING I STORY LOG. IJ/ BASEMENT' ~ ~iq'-~ !als~ ~ ...... ~ -t-----WIIC)()W IIELL ~ ~ E.~• . .t ■------------1-,t l ---~---t' 1)[0-ICAJICN N(W PRCl'OtlY LIN( ---1---+---' ,_Cl>VITY LINC Pflll)l ---1~-+---~ :g- ,, :w ~ :w __ ~---____________________________ Cl OCEAJLBLVD _____ , ______ _ RcrERENCE -___,,._ -- -,------------------------------------------;-----------oqf:{_~~ SCAU" 111• • ''•a' ,. APPLICAHIS, PJID.J[CT KIIHC• MCHUCCJ, Cl'VR. CNCilHCER, LAHDSCAPC ARCHIICCT• :'11'! 1'fl■BT CONDOMINIUMS' NAaftN I CIN(IJ II.AIR PHIL I, PAM ,Al.mu. "' INIIIA UZI SAN Ell(GQ. CA 'JZm SM£ AS AIOV[ DC[NI SIRCCT CDMDOHINILMS Z65'5 OCCAM SIRCCJ CAAi.SiAD. CA ,2001-i?ZJI 2 UHU RCSIDCNTIAL lltVCLDPH'T [N 0€ LOI CINDY kAfa ,,, INll4 al2L • SAH DICC4 CA ,2tt1 D'DAY CrNSll..lloHTS. GEOR[il: O'DAY 7220 AV[NIDA CHCINAS. sunc 204 CARt.SIAD. CA 1~, JNtCS IChCDCHI CARI.SIAD. CA t-g; 6 0 <( N UI ffl :~ t-og a ~2ii ~oii!e SCVCR DISJRICT, WAJU DISJRICT1 SCI-CD. DIURICJ1 CfJY CF CARL.SIAD CAA\.SIAD HUNICIPM. VAf[R IIISIRICf J950 [L CAMINO A(AL. C,IRL SIAD CA CN.LSUD Uilf"ltD SCHIXl. DJSJAICf .. ii{~§:: 100 PU£ AV(t«..C CARt.SIAD. CA PAQJECT BWWB'J' AIIOR£SS, .U5J-26'5 OCCHt SJR£(l CARlSIAD. CA 92GGl-i?2ll ASSESSOR PARCCL Nil SIJC ACRCAGC• 2U-141MI 1, 12 CAALSIAD 01' ACRCS CXISHNG ZONING/ LAND use PRDf>OS[D ZONING/ LAND US[ GCHCRAL PLAN IUILDINCi COVCRAGC SUlRICS• ,so • 14D • 1.000 sr t4J.'40> Rl -IC4CH AR(,\ OV[Rt..AT <IAD> CXISTING l.lHDCVCL(J>(D LOI Rl -ICACH ARCA DVCRt..AT UM)> TVO C[)d)OHINll.14 D\ICLLING UNITS RH 2,1,, 1000 sr • nx 2 1/2 S1DRICS CV/H(ZZANII<) ~3&., ~yw ~~ -~---="~~!!l~ r SID< .... I-ICIGtil IASCNCHT• J• ADklN. VAR R(D D •SfAINGl.lhC' fMttll.A 68' VI 10' IALCOHl[S ,.. ,.. W J/12 A[D" Sll»'[ ,0 l ICUN [XIS JING c:.RAD[ RCD'D 50 X ICLOV BISIIHG GRAD£ PADV'D AV(AAG( DAILY 1AAl'rlC• If. IM.l:!W CALCI.UDQNe \lilLA PAIIO STRCCI L[VCL 2ND LCV(L KZZAHD..C UHU A TDIM. llilLI PATIO IAS[HCNI DW(LLl/iG I ~~~! I GAAAGC I SJOAAG( UlO CU 451 Sf 2,2, Sf' 4H sr ,,J sr 21' sr Joa sr ... $F 451 Si lli'D cu 1120 cu sr:,~: ~•~~~ I :::: :~ I ::: --I I !~~ !! l ~~ I~ 407 Sf .. _ p ~-· p 407Sf' lli!Q CU Slltt:\MJ JOIN S 711K sr ,04 $$: .,. Sf' 2241 cu LAHDSCAP( AACAo PARKING. RC0UIRCD I, PRDPOst• TDfAL• QPENSPACE PRIVAf[ OPCH Sf'AC[ PRIVAl[ l'.F[H SPACC CCMIOH a>CH SPAC[ sec t[PMAT[ LAHllSCAPC l'LAH Z SPACCS PCl1 ~JT X l LWHS • 4 t VISlllM' SPACC PCR i? 1.MIIS • I 4 COVCRCII I Ql(Sf UNIJ A <IALCo.tY I, DECKS> -19' Sf 1#4U I CIAlCl>IY l DCCKS> -lllO tr PAHD I SAND ICiRAC[ -c02, sr ,11 ACR( X It •20, D\ICLLING UNUS DENSITY <ALLCNCD> OEHSITY<PJnFOStlJ I UNITS tJI IWCLLINCi UNJJS PCJI: ACRC> DCVCLCFAIL[ Silt i\REA,, CPCR ZOHIHG DROIHAHCC 21~52$0) •::,. J'' .. -~J-: : -~, 6ci,J,i ,;J-~t·.i:: • .,.,. VICINITY MAP ,.,. . :t ,· Atdlked: ...... t-., I 111::I Ill ::, i; c-t-! ,~~ ., :I zo ~0 Ill Z ll!i; 00 00 ~. :lu I ..... ....... -.... ,.... .... .... ··-1/ll/11 lltVISCI IOJIJ/'1 Jl(VJSCI ZIN/ff RCVJSCI JIZJ/tl SITE PLAN/ PROJECT DATA A1· St,"' Of a ~,· u~· ~ t 01'J' ... 10' 'l(/ no r---, u '---' SCAl.[ ,-,,o• ,· ·-o· . , .,,g l(ACH PL ~•· N(W PROP[RTr L lH[ _ ---"'= Pft[Y IOU$ PflOP[RJY l IN[ ---OCC.t.N ILVD -- ® BASEMENT PLAN -UNIT B i J SOM 1/8" • 1•-0· PATIO/ ~R(A$• PYO I ING )Al CPtlJ GAB•GE UNlf 4 UNI 1' 1 t966 sr •20 sr I. ~ IIZ0 CU UN OCR PA TIO 11?0 CU UND(R PATIO D2 STREET LEVEL PLAN -UNIT B A·1 SCAL.£· 1/0° • 1'-o· AR(•S• PYfl t ING IA\ CDHY UHII A UNI J I 1742 Sf" 40Z SF faARAG( SJQRA(t; 196 SF 407 sr l;g ,;: r I I I I l ~1 .. I I I I • I I ~ I I ., I f I I I I I I I I I I I!'!" ~-~· !4'--0-£ l~• ® 2ND LEVEL PLAN -UNIT A Z / SCALE: 1/6" • r-o· AR£"$• PYELUNG B-'LCONY GARf'Cif $TQBAP[ 001 r ,. 252:s sr ◄04 sr --, I I I : ~ .. Vrgf ~";,_~~ L --:~Jl. ,[, :,.._ A\2 jSCALi:----.--;e-• 1•-0• I i ., I I I I I ' I ' ' ' ',g_ , , I -" , · I l:l ' ' ' , ~ , z , , I "', I , ,21' , , , I I I I I I I I I I !'" , , , , DCCK l~LO\I >II Sllll•t , I DCCk ~ ICLDW' ',, :i ll ® MEZZANINE PLAN -UNIT A l / SCALE l/6° • r-o· " I I I I I I ARE es, D...,n, mo ,,., CONY GARAGE :s IQRAGC UNIT " 9~J sr 21, sr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ... ~ ~ ~ m ~ff ... . ~ ~2ii ,..,.;z I < oil!i ~~~ AlctiM.c:l: -- ... I Ill :I Ill:::, .11 a:- 1-! _, :I !t( zo ◄0 11!8~ IIIZ 00 ;~; 00 ~lo I ... ~ O,K~M , .. ,rojtct l'N .. ,. Re"4tlon• 1/U/H R(\115(0 10/IJ/11 fl[\IIS(O 2/01/U R[VIS(O l/l1/!ill FLOOR/ ROOF PLANS A2 Shttl Of fHl'0002 CXffiIHCTlON U.-.[f&,t S AOOf ru; sn.cco \\NlOIIS ~n.es GW,GE DOC1tS • O,.Jle~ A>U,GS MISSION Ct.AV Jl£ • 4 CCl.00 Bl.EN> MONT,1,L\Q FNSH f l.ff'E'.A t.e.aS. tf:,I\V't FNSH • BASE ~ EX1RJ)ED Wirt. • YffTE ~ TlE PER CCl.OA SO£IU..E ~£>0 SECnc»i,lt. 000A,S Fff-F~TED M;JAL • KMaH CO,\JEO Q.AV n.e • ENTRY BAt.c.oNn Fff f-'BRCAJW t.t:1'.Al. .f'OVaR COATtD w-UEStOM-4 IV,SSlll.00< WKXJNWAU.S: CJJTTEflS& OOM<SPOOI• FETJoH-.Q w.-ua. 9:AWMJ.! ~ ()M£1S W.AUI.S&PAn::>El n:wa..u::ENT PATimN r X f Fm.EDOO'f'ER ST'KWO (H:t COt01:Tc Sl'EQOl fHSHflE)(ltff COtO£lE SAfElY CV.SS N PANfEO Y«)CO FRN,ES 00 FAEIACAJEO '-ETM. mA.t.E • l'OY.cER COATED l'(R.6)COl'fEREIO.OOJlES SAW-0.11 PATl'EPN •nEGRAl. moo co,,.,:f£TE Wt WAStEO ~G.\TE ACCENT BN-DS 01°2' •• 10' 'ld nr.r::::---:-1 ... '---' SCAU: 1/1• • 1' ----· c:r•c IIAIL ,------·-TJl( flOOf I ,----stucco COMtlC[ " ~ ♦ 69°6' 'T 2g'iT""isOVCCRADf Jyp ICALL '{ 7 i I~ I f 'rsnicco I I p ... I ,., ...J-.•••·•· cbw --. ru-=-J--: z'g7ii~Ovc I NJ[l'rPICALL'1t~ I -1 • u l I >o' """' '"~. n,c ..... , ""-... __ _ -rt ~Z!~l~V~ __ _ ~ I • ,,,.-/,, ~~-~ ♦ >21 UPPER LEVfl' ._ .,. /" 3 ., --,----/--r----. --~ ai I I , ~ ; I / ~" l! I +t~'!t . 4 t ~ •• UPP~• Jcvt I t ♦ 4VsTR£ET LEVEL OCE>Hlll.W t t ◄0• STR££ _T _______ , I -l I ,000 IR(Ll" S1'RU(:J\II -~m~m~[!lU!=!D~lll==[ff-=[Jr-=m ~t ~s~~~L!/~E_L ______ __::_ _ _ ~--;;~11-MJi~~'-filu1U)= •Ii' '. /' ----===--w-(Jill~OOWw~~Wrn~rnillrnillmW.rn~l!fTirnIDwillmmffiWfilfruillffiilltuillffi {,;¾,~.;,,----/_ L . Jj~~idJln~wWinllirn™~rn~t!Mm\Mw~rnWm~~~jfi~m\Mm~~ffi + I {, •I I 4 ♦.!.jf:::'"SEALEVEL ________ _ I I !I 1: 'Al\ S.Q\Jil:l_flJ'..'LAJJON A~S J SCALE: 1/e• • 1•~• -----,- --------~- ~ ---I -..__,____ -I --> -~ -~ - : --• '~ Al 1: 0 0 0 I I I • I ------. . -I I I -111-wmWrrM1-ilLF-!am1!iffi'E§iii:~~~~\nm+,,.r=n~[!;;;l1Dffi!~!gffi~lfD 111-w-m11•1tifiEfll~fl=,_U! -~fii~=d: 21 111371::'W=!JJ=,,_ I --l~~~~!~l!J '-lll=W-=,w---=i 11 ITT=lll=!l!m ~::;;Ui=='-'~ -1ml':':ITc:su~-• -1111-111=111=111-n!::iTI!::::JLU-~~-l I I I I Bl\ .SI!lEET ELEVATION NOR'fii A~l7 scAt.-c•-·11a-• 1•-0· ~ I c• isriiic ,i.,.1 ~· lO' BAS[T [V[L -------• -- I I I I I I L __ . ________ J A2) EAST ELEVATION A-l SCALI': ,;a' -f-o' + 69'6' 29°6~0VE GRADE ·yyp ,,-L ~, .. roTERiiACI 17' 1l•~•cr-- --+----4 .! ds!A_ill'.fL_ l_~.£ __ \OC.l\l.,n C.LC.Vl\11\ c. 1;a· • 1 -o· , I I I -·L-i- I I-~ ~ ~ rd :~ ~ o_ ~ ~2~§. oc -~a~· <( 0 II) -::.-::::-.. = :_-_::.:::?---:.. ::.::!.:::::a~ ~ o;;;--: I .. ,, ! . ..J 111:I ~i Ill ::, IIC -t-! M:11 I!~ zo ~0 8;~ IIIZ ~, UO 0 () !:flu I ,,,_ "'" °'""" ,.,.~ .... : .. , . ......... --fl[VIS{D 10/13/17 Jt[VISCO J/O1/H ll[VIS(O J/27/11 llJllDING ELEVATIONS A3 Sh"I OI' .:! 59•5• >•16 """""ieOviciiAO -----( TYPICALLY Q ) l __ I I /,, /??Y)/?»»)7»772»»»»}?}) /,,,,,,,,,,,,,./' I I I !_ lz~~L~V~ _ I . ~ T PfA~L-__ • ~ ,, I I -- 1 j . _,,,,,,,, ~,!' ◄ 'SIR£ / i ,--_;=,=,--~vfL -,-----1 -- ~--------- ♦ •--------------------Al •EAST-WEST SECTION_ A-4 SCALE: 1 I • I -0 ~ • so·s· I I 29'e' ABQV( GRAOE fyp f;ALLY ~I I I ., I I !. ~z~~ L~~ I I I LEV[L_u I I l=U· •==lii=fll=lfl=ITI=="'~ ~-, 111=i11=•"- -----t-I ~ ♦ 5 J SEA LEVEL I -(r.)N~ITTH-~~ ~~□~----, --L-i- ,._. SCAt.£~ I/&' • r-o· ;! r1I !" I =f Ill; J... + ••·•· I I ~ .. ~£TYPICALLY I . I I I !. II. MEZ~...._b-iEVIL I I I I-' -, I 1 !.~~~~ I I I LI I I I I .!' _!Ll~E!_tT'I I I Ls ==w~w~WiiiWiiiWiiilli= + 17' I I ~Aiinrl<A'•,-i---------- NWl~-H---_._ -+-=--, I _)).· •• ,.SEA JEVEL_~-~ --~~~----L _; • E3LNORTH-SOUTH SECTION Ion·•· •~· A-4 SCALE~ I/&' • 1•-0• C\FL____,f--4--::..C::==-i SCAl.1 4t• IIO• I-g; 5 0<( N w m ::;i I-08 ~ ~~i1 ~ o~!i it~;- Ndlllkt: °'""' ... •• • :a lie -,.z •i zo ,CQ •z ()0 0() .. _ I, h~ ~H 0,-"' ......... ""'' ......... ----"""""'''"'" llJILDING SECTIONS A4 ShMI Of • a z II C, • .. . .. . . z j A, OC C O - ! l e 9 - S 9 IC X Z S 't O '0 0 3 J O N' t S 't' I C l N SW l: J I V 1 8 AO N I O J. 0 3 . L I H O l : : 1 \ f I sJ • I> ? ' I I I ~ i;? I I I I i ~ .. 't ' O 'C M I S " l : l \ ' 0 .. .L 3 3 1 i l S N Y 3 0 0 ~ - ~ .L N 3 l ' l d 0 1 3 / ' 3 0 i't ' U N 3 C J S 3 l : j JH l I: y Sl l n l N I I I O G N O O • Ul : ! I I H J . S NY i l O O !· uu 00 j ~ : ! i t I .. . ru < l! • I I . i I '