The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1980-12-10; Planning Commission; ; CUP 184 - CABLEVISION ANTENNA ON NORTHEAST SIDE OF SQUIRES RESERVOIR DAMSTAJ?F REPORT DATE: December 10, 1980 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: CUP-184 -Request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a 160' high communica- tions antenna on the northeast side of Squires Dam Reservoir. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project involves the construction of a 160' high cable television relay tower, two 16' dia- meter satellite antennas at ground level, and a 320 sq. ft. masonry block equipment building, all located in a circular area, 280' in diameter, as shown on Exhibit A. The site is located at the end of Sunny Creek Road about l½ miles east of El Camino Real, between Palomar Airport Road and Tamarack Avenue on Carlsbad Municipal Water District Squires Dam Property. This property is vacant except for an existing 300' high radio tower and an adjacent 500 sq. ft. block house owned by station KKOS on the northwestern side of the reservoir. This existing tower was approved by the Planning Commission per CUP-144, dated November 9, 1977. Additionally, the site for the proposed tower is generally level and will require only about 50 cubic yards of grading. II. ANALYSIS Planning rs·sues 1) Is the proposed project compatible with the existing and future surrounding land uses with respect to visual impacts, broadcast frequency interference, and the objectives of the general plan? 2) Does the project meet the required findings for a CU;!?? Discussion The proposed site for CUP-184 is one of the highest and most isolated areas in Carlsbad, and as such it is ideal for communication reception and transmission. A portion of this property is being utilized for this purpose presently by radio station KKOS with no apparent (!) - negative effects. The surrounding land is largely agricultural to the west and vacant land with· natural vegetation in all other directions. The general plan has designated the area surrounding and including the site as open space and nearby Low Density Residential. Staff feels that since this project would be a desir- able public service that the tower would be more com- patible with the existing and future land uses at this site than at other less desirable sites. Also, the extreme topography surrounding the project prevents the tower from creating any serious visual impacts on future residential areas. A staff concern was possible broadcast frequency inter- ference with an adjacent sensitive receiving antenna and laboratory operated by the U.C.S.D. Department of Electrical Engineering. This department has indicated, however, that the erection of this tower would not interfere with their reception. Staff has found that the requested use is desirable for the development of the community, is essentially in harmony with the various elements and objectives of the general plan, and is not detrimental to the existing uses or to uses permitted in the zone. Further, the proposed site is adequate in size and shape to acco- modate the use, and that since the project is unmanned, no traffic impact upon the area will result. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and therefore has issued a Negative Declaration on November 14, 1980. IV. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that·the Planning Commission· Al?l?ROVE the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Resolution No. 1731,· APPROVING CUP-184, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. ATTACHMENTS PC Resolution No. 1731 Background Data Sheet Location Map Exhibit "B", dated November 24, 1980 Reduced Elevations Environmental Documents Disclosure Form Exhibit "A" dated October 27, 1980 PK:jt 11/25/80 .BACKGROUND DATA SHEm' CASE NO; CUP-184 APPLICANT: 'lbny Acone -Cablevision REUJE,ST AND ICCATION: CUP to construct television "t7"ansmi tter • North side of Squires Dam Mt. bet.ween 33° 09' 10" N Lat. & 117° 15' 28" W Long .. •• Im DESCRIJ?TIQil: Approxitmatly 52 acres identified in File Page No. 141468, filed August 17 2 1961. Assessors Parcel Nt.mi:Jer: 169 230 -02 -------- Acres 1. 44 acres No. of IDts 1 --------Leased From 51.87 acre lot GENERAL PIAN AND ZONING General Plan Land Use Designation __ o.:..p_en_S..:.p_a_c_e __ _ Density Allowed N/ A --'--------Density PJ:oposed __ N_/A ____ _ EK:i.sting.zone -------------R-A-(10) Proposed Zane ___ N_/_A ____ _ Surrounding Zoning am Land use: Zon:wJ I.and Use North R-A (County) Vacant South R-A (10) Vacant Fast R-A (County) Vacant West R-A (10) Agriculture PUBLIC FACILITIES School District Water District Sewer District Carlsbad • Carl shad ---~c-a~r~Js~h~a~d.__ _________ EDU's _ __.N=/~A ____ _ Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated ___ o~ct~o~b~e~r----=2=2~,~1~9~8~0!-,. _ _;_ ____ _ (Other: ----------------------------'> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT __ x __ Negative Declaration, issued November 14, 1980 Log No. ______ _ E.I.R. Certified, dated --------------- Other, --------- LOl.ATION 1VI AP / . --. / . I f -·---.. ·,., i >--------------....Ji-_ .s.b. C~.!?.. • __ NO. C.U P 184 VI l l M rf, t1Af1 i , I _______ c_ u __ ~_J:.? ~-:--, _ a 1-B. .. I r ' I I 1200 ELM AVENUE:: CARLSBAD. CALIFORNIA 92008 TELEPHONE: C714) n.>-1181 -FlE.COPY • "NEGATIVTI DECLARATION PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: __ No_r_th_ea_s_t_s_id_e_o_f_Sgu:i. __ ._r_e_s_Darn_._. _be_o_:i1e_en ___ _ 33 09'10" north latitude and 117 15'28" west longitude. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: • 160' high corrmunications antenna for the _______ ___,:;.._ ________________ _ Daniels Cablevision·tmpany·fo.r television ·transmissions to cable T~V. ·subscribers in· catlsbad .• The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the above described. project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said rcv~ew, a Nega- tive Dcclarntion (declaration that the project will not have a signi- ficant impact on the environment) is hereby issued for the subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the Planning D::~partrncnt. A copy of the Ncp,ativc Declaration with supportive documents :i.s on file "in the Planning Dcp::irtmcnt, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Car] sh.ad; CA. 92008. Co;rn11(~nts from the public arc invited. Please submit comments in ,\·dt~ng !o the J>l:nming Dcpartn_1cnt within, ten (J0~/ys of elate of A puhJ1cat1on • _______ . c ---;t;~;:''{.,C.--;, DXIB): Novanber 14,· 1980 SIG!\l:11: ~--, v·~c---l,.,,·:.;~( ..... \!·~ir::<;"""-r::-H\-C1\~C\N /f-7 Cl\~E ~_cjjp-i&4--:-_:::, / ~~ .-nmh1g _Dhcc tor / ~~ (/ (~:1.ty o.f (.::rlsh:itl . //' /\1 lj >j, l C/\JH: 1\00NE -------------·•···-·- l'ill:LTSII ll-\TE: ND '1 TELEPHONE: 1200 ELM AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008 FILE COPY1141n•A1a1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE: <titp of etarlsbab PUBLIC NOTICE OF PREPARATION The Planning Departinent of the City of Carlsbad intends to prepare a x Negative Declaration, ___ Conditional Negative Declaration, Environmental Impact Report for the following project: --- Project Description: 160' 11igh Conmunications AntePJ1a for the Daniels ·Cablevision Company for television transimissions to Cable T.V. subscribers in Carlsb;d. Project addressiLocation: East side of Squires Dam. Anticipated significant impacts: No significant adverse environmental jmpacts are anticipated by this project. We need to know your ideas about the effect this project might have on the environment and your suggestions for ways the project conld be re- vised to reduce or avoid any signi,ficant enviTorunental damage. Your ideas will help us decide what _issues to analyze in the environmental review of this project. • .• Exhibit 'A to • Resolution No. 6214 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM Part I • (To Be Completed By Applicant) •• EIA NO .. • ------ .. •. GENERAL INFORMATION .. 1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor·:' _____ ~-· . Daniels Cablevision Inc. 2725 Jefferson car lsbad, Calif .. 92008 • • . . 2.· Address of project: 5205 Sunny Creek Carlsbad Assessor's Block • and. Lot Number: '. • 169-230-02 ----------------- 3. Name, address, and telephone number. of person to be contacted . concerning this project,; Daniels Qahleyisjon, Inc, . 2725 Jefferson, Carlsbad 729-7929 'l,'QPY Acone 4. Indicate number of the permit application for th~_project to. which thJs form pertains: __ ~c~.u_._P_~_-_____________ _ i ·5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by ?ity, regional, state and federal.agencies: ______ _ Conditional use;. building (city_).-FAA1 FCi _approvals 6. Existing ~oning district: RA 10,000 ------------------ Proposed u·se of site (p~oject fo·r which this form is filed) : Microwave Transni tter and CATV Head End • BACKGROUND INFORMATION . . 1. Give a-brief description·of the proposed activity _(attach any preliminary development plans}; include a discussion of si~e size; square footage of project: amount of off street parking; proposed scheduling and related·or a~sociated projects and anticipated ·incremental ~evelopment~ Circular a:rea 140' radius for tdRer, building, antennae and associated . equ.ipnent for delivery of television service. . . ) . . . . . . • .. • • . . 2. Describe the.activity·area, including distiguishing natural and manmade characteristics; also provide precise .~lope analysis when appropriate. Costa Real ttnnicipal Water District reservoi~, surrounding area agriculture • 3.. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific disqussion of energy conservation_ requirements see of the City's EIR guidelines)· . NA • 4·. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of, household size expected .. NA·: 5. • lf commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city_or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. .. 6. w NA . . . If industrial, indicate type, esti~ated employment per shift, and loading facilities. Rall:>te site unmanned facilit~. 7. If institutional, indicat; the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occup~ncy, loading facilities, and conunu~ity benefits to be derived from the project. NA • ------ I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space. (Discuss all items ehecked yes. Attach additional sheets as necessary) .. • ·Yes No 1. Could the -project significantly change.present. land use~ in the vicinity of the activity~· 2. Could the activity affect the use of a recrea-_ .tional area, or area of important aesthetic value? 3. :could the activity affect the fu~ctioning of an _ established community or neighborhood? 4. ·Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? • s: Could the activity increase the number of low and mode~t cost housing units in the city. 6. 7. 8. -9. 10. 11. - . . Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in.the-city. Are any of the natural or man-made features in the activity are~ unique, that is, not found in other parts of the County, State, or Nation?. Could the activity signif i~antly affec:t • a histor- ical or archaelogical_ site or its settings? Coulp the activity significantly affe~t the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resou~ce? Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source nesting place, source of water, etc. for rare or·endangered wildlife on fish spec~es? Could the activity significantly affect. fish, wildlife or plant life? • 12; Are there any rare or. endangered pla:nt species in the activity area? 13. Could th~ activity change existing.features of a~y of the city's lagoons,· bays, or tidelands? -14. Could the activity change ~xisting 'features of any of the City's bc·achcs? .. 15. Could the activity result in'the erosion or elimination of agricultural land~? . . 16. Could the activity serve to encourage develop- ment of presently undeveloped areas or intensify development of already developed areas? .x .. -- .JL.. X X X X X .. ---• X X X .lL.. X .x .. .. (Hi) . ' ' "' 17. Will the activity require a variance from established environmental standards (air, water, noise, etc}? 18. Will the activity require certification, authorization or issuance of a permit by any iocal, State or Federal environmental control agency? 19. Will the activity_ require issuance of a variance Yes No X X or conditional use permit by the City? _x_ 20. Will the activity involve the application, use, or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? 21. Will the activity involve construction of facilities in a flood plain? 22. Will the activity involve construction of facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? 23. Will the activity involve const+uction-of facilities in the area of an active fa·ult? 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. Could the activity result in the generation of significant amqunts of noise? Could the a~tivity result in the generation of significant amounts of dust? Will the activity involve the burning.9f brush, trees, or other materials? Couid the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of_ the region's air or water resources? (Should note, surface, ground water, off-shore). Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption (electricity, oil; natural gas, etc.)? Will there be.a significant change to existing land form? • (a) indicate estimated grading to be done in cubic yards. less than· 50 .. (b) percentage of alteration to the present.land form. NA • X X. X _x_ x· X X X (c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes. NA ---------30. Wlll the ~ctivity result in substantial increases in the use of utilities, sewers drains or ·streets? • 31. Is the-activity carricd·out as part of~ larger.project or series of projects?· • x. .lL .. ' • • II. STATE. OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENllIRONMENTAL·EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but _you think the activity will have no significant envi·ronmental effects, indicate your reasons below:· . No effect" . II+. COMMENTS OR ELABORATIONS 'TO ANY OF THE QUESTIONS IN SECTION I (if additional space is -n attach additional sheets answering any questions, needed . .) •signature_""-:::::::::::1111...-~::-ii~-1-~~~ .... -~----:-~---------. . . Date ·signed:_~-·~/2:....l·zl~J_/z_z.~A-'r';::;;... _o_: __ ·_.· --------- .. Co~clus'ions (To be completed by the Planning Director). Place a check in the appropriate box. ( ) Further information is required. ( ) It has been determined that the project-will not have sign~~icant environmental effects. ( ) You must submit a preliminary environmental impact.statement by the following date.----=--...--{ ) You should ma~e an appointment with the Planning Director to discuss further processing of your project, in accordance with Chapter 19.04 of the Municipal Code. • DATE RECEIVED': • ---------------• :Br ,------------------Planning Director; or; ' .--- ru-w IRONMF.NTAL TI,IPACT ASSESSMENT "FORM -Part II (To Be Completed By TI1e PI.ANNING DEPARTMENT) CASE NO. tu e-15:y' n~m: 11/g/Jb· --ti I . B1\CKGRCill'm 1. APPLICA1,rr: /)JltJ1 €' L.S 2. ADDRESS AND PHONE NUMBER OF APPLICANT: ------------2: 2 2-S JErE€7<$ ~N ~r. ~<:--Sl$d:LJ 3. DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITIED: / t' / 2 ~ / tft:; _...,__,,.,._ __ .,,., ___________ _ I I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (TIXPLA.tl\JATIONS OF ALL AFFIRMATIVE ANSWERS ARE TO HE WRITTEN UNDER Section III -DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION) 1. Earth Will the proposal have signi- f ican:~·resu1 ts in: a.· Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or gromd surface relief features? d, The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or ero- sion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or strerun or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Yes No· X ND 2 ( 2. Air: Will the proposal have signi- results in: a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, mositure or tempeTature, or any change in clirnate, either locally or regionally? 3. Water: Will the proposal have sigi- f icant results in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water move- ments, in either marine or fresh waters? ~ b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water 1unoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of sur- face water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface ~rater quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through • direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception· of an aquifer by c1;1ts or exca~:ations? h. Reduction in the amount of water otherwise availahle ;for public water supplies': Yes Maybe No )( )( X X I 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? . 5. Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi- ficant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (pirds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shell- iish, benthic organisms, insects or micro fauna) 7 b. Reduction of the numbers of any tmique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. ·Noise. Will the proposal signi~ ficantly increase existing noise levels? 7. •Light arid Glare. WiJ 1 the pro .. posal significantly produce new light or glare? 8. Land Use. Will the proposal have sii,lflificant results in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? -3- Yes Maybe No X X X I 9. Natural Resources. Will the pro- posal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of haz- ardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. Population. Will the proposal significantly alter the location, distribution, den~ity, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal signi- ficantly affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housjng? 13. • • Citculation. Will ve significant re- sults in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b, Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Impact upon existing trans~ portation systems? d, Alterations to pre.sent patterns of circulation or move- ·ment of people and/or goods? c. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f, Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? -4- Yes Maybe No X X X ·X ... X ·X .. X ... )( -- ... x ( 14. Public Services. Will the pro- posal have a signjficant effect upon, or have significant results in the need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: 15. a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? f. Other govennnental services? .: Enerfi. Will the proposal have sign1 icant results in: a. Use of substantial amormts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develop- ment of new sources of energy? -16. Utilities. Will the proposal have significant results in the need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b.._ Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e., Stonn water drainage? £. Solid waste and disposal? 17, • Human Health. Will the proposal have signTgrcant. results in the. creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (~eluding mental health)t -s- Yes Maybe No X X -L X X --x 2( )( --~- ·x X ·X I Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the nroposal have s:fgnificant results :i.n· the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. Recreation. Will the proposal have s1gn1ficant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? X 21. ANALYZE VIABLE ALTERNATIVES TO TI-JE PROPOSED PROJECT SUCH AS: a) PHA~ED DE'VELOPMENT OF TI-lE PROJECT; b) AL 1TRNATE SITE DESIGNS; c) ALTEF~\JATE SO\LE OF DEVELOPMENT; d) ALTERNATE USES FOR TI-IE SITE; e) DEVELOPMENT AT SOME FUTTJRE TIME RAThtR 11IA1\J NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES FOR IBE PROPOSED USE; g) NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE. X X NO frl.rc"l<.IVffrtVE.S Tl> 77-fE ~/Zor'tJSELl p tZ-c..:n:=-c r /lie~~ /!>~ ."IAJ /tL Y :y;;o ,15 /t/W~ I 5 /N Ct)A)vl.,//l/CT/OA.I /lf/lTII F)(l5nAl<s-. Pfll!>ltc scRv1c:.~g 4Nf) ~e W1LL ~ A/0 516/V/rlCHNt (bl'</tLv~ 0~ ,./JISTtJrc;SA/1/CF Or l/EGir/l 77C>AI, -6- ---- Yes Maybe No 22. ?vIANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE 1HE POTEN- TIAL TO DEGRADE THE QUALI1Y OF THE ENVIRONMENT, OR CURTAIL THE DIVERSITI IN 1HE ENVIRONMENT? b) DOES 'IHE PROJECT HAVE 11-IB POTEN-. TIAL TO ACHIEVE SHORT-TERM, TO 1HE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-TERt\.f, ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT- TERM IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS ONE \liHICH OCCURS IN A RE- LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE PERIOD OF TIME WHILE LONG-TERM IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL INI'O nm FUWRE.J c) DOES TI-IE PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS WHICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED BUT CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE? (A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON 1WO OR MORE SEPARATE RESOURCES \~1-IBRE THE IMPACT ON EACH RE~ SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL, BUT WHERE THE EFFECT OF THE TOTAL OF ·rnosE IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.) d) DOES TI-IE PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON- MENTAL EFFECTS ¼HICH WILL CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS, EI'IHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? III.· DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUTION ' .x K X X. ·:#'jg') 7'/1?' / 60 -r r; C GJn?/'17VA/IC/f7lCW rollil~. t::-d/i,L- /!;€' //I 511$1.-€' ;::'/et:YV1 _4 CEA/G7ll'f /)1 ~T/l/1/Cf:- . f/Ct/cleve/.Z ~ e><TR~mt:" 70AJG~Pt1y 5u,e.,e.ovAIIJ1NG-~ ~.a~c, Ptt..t:_-vENrs -rJ1lF ro,ve7<. PIU,n ~/I r;AIG-A/1/Y ~cA::.10JS I/ISll/17-l/i-1~.t1cr5> 0/11 SV/<~l>C/AILJ/AIG /<ES -• / l)G'° 11/rl /tL /t;e-Fl'f ~. 77/{;' .s v te/<_~ e1AI/J /.A/6--6G""AJ~ /Jt.,,/1.IV ~11"1/() ll~~ L)E~/6N/f77C¥1/.5;. A-NIJ ~.AIIAIC..,- r v G 6e= ~ r 7H ,,,..,.,-;If i{).:T//c~ Air P/17<cG""LS. w, ~· l-> -7- - I . . . DISCUSSION OP ENVIRO~ EVALUATION (Continued) NOt /JEtlt=?-0~ /.IV 77~ /l)E,,#< ,Fl.)Tt,),e~ 77:lus /IA:? /M/9/fCrs. '-Jo 77/ES€ /JmKE~ ~ /j/11 - 71c; '° /f re I) .. IV. DETERMINATION. (TO BE COMPLETED BY IBE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) X On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepaTed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A conditional negative declaration will will be prepared. I £ind the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIROI'ltvffiNTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. V. MITIGATING MEASURES (IF APPLICABLE) -9- .. MITIGATING lv['-:ASURES (_Continued) VI ,APPLICANT CONCURRENCE WI1H MITIGATING MEASURES IBIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I HAVE Rb-VIEWED TI-IE ABOVE MITIGATIONG MEA- SURES AND CONCUR WIIB '11-IE ADDITION OF 1HESE MEASURES TO 1HE PROJECT. Date: ------------Signature of Applicant M8t-UHms: j,,fut.m;1tinll yo1'--\1,1vc m1hmiltcd h,l:, li<•<'n r:.::vic,.-;-.:.:..l, il i:.; dc\.t:n11incd jn(ormation i!, .!quired, yo11 will t .. ~ tiO advi~:l Dani els OJble:sdsion -Inc.-----·-----------------Nwno (incliv idu<11, p.:1rt1u .. ?fsh~p, joi11l v.cnturu, corporcJ.ti(ln. syndication) 2725 Jefferson, C8.rlsbad, Ca. 92008 J!ut:inc:;H Mdrcs::; ---- 729-7929' '.1'1::lephona NumLcr 'lbny Acone Name 2725 Jefferson Cs.rlsbad. Ca~ 92008 Business Address 729-7929· Telephone Number NA Name (individual, partner, joint venture, corpm . .-ation, syndication) Business Addreli$ Home Address -------------------Telephone Number Name Business Add~ass • Tcl~J:)hone Number 'l'elephone Nu.mbar Homa Address • • . 'l'elep~tonc Number .. ..... .• --------------: • (J\ttach more she<.:ts if necessary) 1/\t/e dee:] arc under pe11t1l t.y of per jury tl1a t the information contained in tf1is dis-· closure js truu and correct and t.hat jt will remain.true and correct aucl may be rel h~d u1,on as hein9 true and correct unti 1 ameudcu. - . Daniels Cablevision, Inc. EXHIBIT "An LEGAL 0 ESCR I PT IO M See attached lease Wmnt $' .. .. .. .. .. .. .. t , 1NDmuAI.I Am l3Y PRINCIPAL State of California County of San Diego On this 22 day of October, 1980, before me, Kerry Craig, a notary public in and for the State of California with principal office in the County of San Diego, residing therein, duly Comnissioned and sworn, personally appeased Tony Amne, known tome to be the person whose nanoe is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEItEOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my offical seal at my office in the aforesaid County, the day and year in this certificate first above written. OFFICIAL SEAL SAN DIEGO COUNTY ’ :lay ll. lg84 I ~ ’ My Commission Expires Nota& Publik! in and fwhe State of California, with principal office in the County of San Diego , e= 23-0 ' 7-2 /38.4- 7' L =/5z 9/ ' I SC.9LLE I-