HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-02-11; Planning Commission; ; CUP 192 - ECKE/PEA SOUP ANDERSEN WINDMILL TOWERSTAFF REPORT
DATE: February 11, 1981
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: CUP-192, ECKE, Request for a conditional use permit
to construct an 80 foot high windmill as part of the
previously approved Anderson's Pea Soup Restaurant
and motel complex on the northeast corner of t'alomar
Airport Road and Paseo Del Norte in the CT-Q zone.
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval of an 80 foot high
windmill as part of the previously approved Pea Soup Anderson's
travel center, located as described above. Approximately
10-20% of the electrical power required for the facility will
be generated by this windmill.
A Site Development Plan for the Pea Soup Anderson travel center
was approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting of
September 10, 1980 (see attached exhibits). At this meeting,
the applicant also requested approval of a height variance
to allow an increase of the 35' building height limit of the
CT-Q zone to allow the 80' high windmill. At that time, the
Planning Commission denied the variance because they could
not make all the four mandatory findings required for approval.
The Commission did not object to the windmill, however, and
directed staff to prepare an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance
to provide for windmills which exceed the height limitation.
On November 12, 1980, the Planning Commission approved a
Zone Code Amendment (ZCA-128) which provided for windmills
which exceed the height limit of the underlying zone upon
approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Approval was made
subject to the finding that the primary purpose of the
windmill is to generate usable electrical or mechanical energy
and that the windmill is architecturally integrated with the
other buildings on the site. Based on this amendment, the
applicant is now requesting approval for a Conditional Use
Permit to construct the 80 foot high windmill.
II. ANALYSIS
Planning Issues
1) Is the proposed use desirable for the community and
in harmony with the various elements and objectives
of the General Plan?
2) Will the proposed use be compatible with other
existing and permitted future uses in the vicinity?
3) Is the site for the proposed use adequate in size
and shape to accommodate the use?
4) Is the primary purpose of the windmill to generate
usable electrical or mechanical energy and is the
windmill architecturally integrated with buildings
to be placed on the site?
III. DISCUSSION
As mentioned, the Planning Commission has already reviewed the
proposed windmill and has indicated no major problems with
it. As shown on the attached exhibits, the proposed windmill
is part of a well-designed travel center consisting of a motel,
restaurant and related facilities. Further, the windmill is
not in conflict with the General Plan. The proposed use will
also be compatible with the existing and future permitted uses
in the area since most of the surrounding properties have been
designated for travel services or commercial development by
the General Plan. The Commission has previously reviewed the
site plan for this project and has determined that the site
for the proposed travel center is adequate in size and shape
to accommodate the use and the surrounding street system is
adequate to handle all traffic generated by this project.
Finally, the windmill will generate 10-20% of the energy for
the facility and is architecturally integrated with the other
buildings to be placed on the site. Staff feels, therefore,
that all the required findings for approval of a Conditional
Use Permit can be made.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Planning Director has determined that this project will
not have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore
has issued a negative declaration on January 19, 1981.
V. RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the
negative declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt
Resolution No. 1765 APPROVING CUP-192, based on the findings
and subject to the conditions contained therein.
ATTACHMENTS
PC Resolution No. 1765
Background Data Sheet
Location Map
Disclosure Form
Environmental Documents
Exhibits A and B, dated January 27, 1981
MH:ar -2-
CASE NO: CUP-192
l-u>PLICliliT: PAUL ECKE
REQUT'~T l"i.ND LC.Cl.\.TION: Construct a windmill tower 80' .high which exceeds 35' limit
on the east side of 1-5, Palcm,ar Airport Road and car Country.
LEG?'J:, DE.SCRIP'I'IO:N": All that portion of IDt H of Rancho Agua Hediorrla according
to Map 823 filed in San Diego County.
Assessors Parcel Nurrber: 211 ]3, 14
Acres 12 No. of Lots
_ 021_
2 -------------
GENERl\.L PI.AN A."t-ID ZO1.1ING
General Plan Lancl Use Designation TS ---------
Density Al.lcwed ---------N/A Density Proposed --~N~/=A,__ ___ _
Existing Zone CT-Q Proposed Zone ____ N~/_A ____ _
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning_
North C-2 -----
South C-2 -----
F.ast R-A-10
West
School District
Water District
Sewer District
Carlsbad
Carlsbad
Carlsbad
Land Use
Crnmercial
Carirercial
Agriculture
Freewav
PUBLIC FACILITIES
EDU's N/A ------------------___ ...,._......_ ____ _
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated __________________ _
(Other: )
ENVIRONMrNl'AL IMPACT 1'.SSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued JAN. 19, 1981 Log No. -------------X CUP-192
E:.I.R. Certified, dated ---------------
Other, --------------------------------'-----
LOLATDON
CASE NO. CUP l_:12
AtorPLICANT PAu L Ee.KE.
Ii aft.Pr t.bc~ inform:il.~on you h,:ivc ~mhmittcc1 ha:; been reviewed, it J.i:; determined
t}wt furl.h,'r jnform<1t·.ion is rcqujn2d, you wi]l bti so advi~;t~d.
1\.1-'PLJCAN'l':
MEMBERS:
Pea Soup __ Ang.ersen' s, Inc.
Name (individual, partnership, joint venture, corporation, syndica_l.ion)
P.O. Box W, Bu~llton, CA. 93427
Business Address
(805) 688-5581 -------------'l' cl e p hon c Number
John C. White, Coldwell Banker Co.
Name
P.O. Box 919, Carlsbad, CA. 92008 -----------·--------------------------------Business Addrc~ss
(714) 434-1081
Telephone Number
Paul and Magdalena Ecke
Name (individual, partner, joint Home Address-
venture, corporation, syndication)
P.O. Box 488, Encinitas, CA. 92024
Business Address
Telephone Number
Name
Telephone Number
Home Address
\;: .Y t~
TI:c $100.oo
f..ECEI.PT NO:
E,\'VIROI'<'MENTAL IMPACl' ASSESSMENl' FORM -Part I
(To be Completed by APPLICA~'T)
Please see EIA log no. 748 for
this same site. Approved 8-28-80
Applicant: Pea Soup Andersen's
CASE ~O:
DATE: 11-26-80
---·----------------
A2dr~ss of Applicant: P.O. Box W. Buellton, CA 93427
--------------
Phone Number: ( )
Name, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant):
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Rollie H. Magboo, Rick Engineering Company 3088 Pio Pico Dr., Ste 202
729-4987
GTh'"ERAL INFORMATION:
De.scription of Project: ~ee proposed use of site below. This is also
being submitted to amend the previous E.I.A. log no. 74B approved
8-28-80.
Project Location/Address: Northeast Quadrant of I-5 and Palomar Airport
Road South of Car Country & West of Paseo Del Norte.
Assessor Parcel Number: 211 -021 -13 & 14
Zone of Subject Property: CT-Q See Case no. ZC-213 approved 8-13-80.
Proposed Use of Site: Construction of a Travel Center to include a
750 seat restaurant, 150 unit motel, convenience store, service
station anc 125 seat Gourmet Restaurant, see SDP 80-11, approved 9-10-80
List all other applicable applications related to this project:
Grading Permit
ND 1
Describe the 2.ctivity area, inciuding-distinguishing
natural and mn!lTIE!.de characb:~ristics; also prov.i_de precise
slope analysis when appropriate.
Site is adjacent to I-5 _approximately ½ _mile from the Pacific
Ocean. Surrounding development~ include Car Country, Denny's
Restaurant, Hadley's Orchards, Burrough's Plant and Stillman
Seal Corp.
3. Describe energy conservation measures incorporated into
the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more
specific discussion of· energy conservation requirements
:::;ee of the City's EIR Guidelines).
A windmill will be incorporated into the design which will
generate from 10%-20% of the electrical power required ..
Construction and insulation will conform to Title 24 standards.
Solar panels will be used for the motel swemming pool. Water
conserving toilets and flow_restricting water valyes will be used.
4. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of
unit sizes, range of sale prices or re~ts, and type of
household size expected.
N/A
5. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood,
city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area,
&1d lo~cing facilj.ties.
-Please see attached Master Site Plan.
6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per
shift, and loading facilities.
N/A
....
7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
ernployreent per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the
project.
N/A
-2-
•
I. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the
appropriate space. (Discuss all items checked yes. Attach
additional sheets as necessary) ..
1)
2)
3)
4)
Could the project significantly change present
·1and uses i~ the vicinity of the activity?
Could the activity affect the use of a rec-
reational area, or area of important
aesthetic value?
Could the activity affect the functioning of
an established community or neighborhood?
Could the activity result in the displacement
of community resider.ts?
5)' Could the activity increase the number of low
·and moderate cost housing units in the city?
6) Could ~he activity decrease the number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
7} Are any of the natural or man-made features
in the activity area uniq•·~, that is r not •
found in other parts of the County, State,
or Nation?
8} Could the activity significantly affect a
historical or archaeological site or its
settings?
9} Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
of a scarce natural resource?
10) Does the activity area serve as a habitat,
food source nesting place, source.of water,
etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish
species?
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildlife or plant life?
·12} Are there any rare or endangered plant
species in the activity area?.
13) Could the activity change existing features
of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or
• tidelands?
YES NO
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
XK
14) Could the activity change existing features of
any·of the city's beaches?
15)
17).
18)
19J
Could· the activity result in the erosion or
el~mination of agricult:.ural lands?
Could the activity serve to encourage develop-
ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify
development of already developed areas?
Will the activity require a variance from
established environmental standards (air, water,
noise, e-tc)?
Will the activity require certification,
authorization or issuance of a permit by any
local, state or federal environmental control
agency?
Will the activity require issuance of a
variance or conditional use permit by the city?
20), Will the activity involve the application, use,
or disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
21) .Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
22) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater?
23) Will the activity involve construction of
facilities in the area of an active fault?
24)" Could the act1vity result in the generation
of signj_ficant amounts of noise?
25} Could the·activity result in the generation
of significant amoun~s of dust?
26) Will the activity involve the·burning of brush,
trees, or other materials?
• ·27) Could the activity result in a significant
change in the quality of any portion of the
. region's air or water resources? (Should note,
s~rface, ground water, off-shore).
28) Will the project substantially increase fuel
consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)?
29) Will there be a.significant c~ange to existing
land form?
-4-
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
• xx· .
xx
·XX
(c) indicate ·estir::atec. grading to be.done in
cubic yards 25,000± CY see below
(b) percentage of alteration to the present
land form .insignificant see below
(~} maximu.~ height of cut or fill slopes
Essentially no cut or fill slopes. Finish contour lines tie
30) Wl.11 ~xistiDg.contours p~r grading ~lan~. (attached) tne activity result in substantial increases
in the use of utilities, seweys_, _drains, or
rtreets? xx
3l) Is the ac~ivity carried out as part of a iarger
project or series of projects? xx ------
29)
.·
(a) Total cut= 11,800 CY Ba-sed on pr_oposed & existing contom Total fill = 24,700 CY
Parking ·areas undercut = 9,600 CY
Build•ing areas undercut ::;: 15 ,.300 CY
Total structures undercut = 24,900 CY -Due to expansive soil
A eortion or all of the structures undercut in the proposed parcel
1 may be replaced by the non-exp~nsive soil in the proposed parcel
2.
The average cut and fill are as follows;
= 2.09'
1.34'
Average _cut
Average ·fill=
-s-
II. STATEMENT OF KON-SIGNIFIOOIT b"\V:iRONMENTAL EFFECT'S
If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions
in Section I but you think the activity will have no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons
below:
16.) Activity may result in intensifying development of surrounding area
with uses similar to but smaller in scope.
IIL CO.MENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANf OF IBE QUESTIONS IN ~"ECTION I
(If additional space is needed for answering any questions
attach additional sheets as may be needed).
--✓•
Signature ---~..-I:;'..::.._;;_..,..;.~-"-...::...~---~---~------g report)
Date Signed / 2~ J"?I@ · ---1---,,.........-/ _____ _
-6-
E:NTl~fr,!\1!:~Jr/d, 1~,iP,\CT AS.';ESS\il":NT F0!-~\1 -Part II ·-· .. ·-·•..L.------·-··-·-------····---·--·----....... --.. -
(To Be Co!nplcted J~y The
PLANNING DEPJ\R'Ji.11 ·:~T)
CASE NO. C ti/-/f 2
})ATE: / ')_ / l f /fO
• J. N1Cl~GROUND
l.
2. . ADDRE~;~-~ AND rIIONE Nu-;\lliER OF J\PPLIC/\,Vl': ___ .......;;..._ _________ _
f). 0, • f3o:;< W.
---~8-·tt_· e_f;--'1/7''--t?_N__,,· :_. _c._·c::,_·,·_---'-· 'J 3 '() ?.
/l./ /5 /80
t. J. En.1.th Will t!1e;; proposal have signi-
f:ican·c·i·c·su1 ts in:
a. UnstnbJc enrth conditions or in
cl1nnzcs :in geologic s1.ilistructurcs?
b. D:isruptions, <lisp] accrncnts, com··
pacticm or uvcrcovcring of the soil'?
·c. Chcmgc :in topogrnphy or ground
~-urfacc rcJ·icf features?
cl. The c1cstn1ction, covering or
1noc1ific1t fon of ;.-my 1miqur.' geologic
or phy~;:icaJ fc;~turc:;'?
c. Any :i11crcasc in wind or ,-mtcr
erosi011 of !,oils, citbcr on or off
the site?
f. Ch~m;~cs in dcpositjon or cro~
sjon of hc;1ch sand~;, or changes
jn s:i.l tati <.111, dcpo~;:i t'i 011 or C'ro:::ion
,~hich rn:1y modify 1hc ch:11111e;l of a
1··ivcr or '.,1 rc:1m or tlic licLl oC the
occ(m or ~1ny hay, .i 11] ct or bl:c?
?-,1a)rl:c~ ·-----
····x
.. )(
ND 2
2. Air: Will the propos.11 hav2 sj;gni-
rcsul ts in:
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambjcnt aiT quality'?
b. The creation of objcction:ible
odors?
c. Alteration of ajr movement,
mositurc or temperature, or uny
ckmgc h1 cJj.1n:ite, either locally
.r,r rcgi01'}0lly?
3; Wa1:cr: Will the proposal have sigi-
Ticiint rcsul ts in:
a. Chmir,cs in currents, OT the
course or <lirectio,1 of Kater move-
ments, jn e:i.thcr marine or fresh
waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainaBc p.:-:ttcrns, or the rate and
amo1-mt o.f sur:f..ice water runoff?
c. Alteration.:.. to the coarse or
flcJW of flood \\1atci-s?
cl. Chaniie in the amount of sur-
face ,-m.ter in any wa tcT bod)'?
e. Discharge jnto surface ,._.atcrs,
or iu any altc-n1tion of surf3ce
water qu~li ty, in~luc1ing but not
limit.cu to temperature, dissol...-cd
oxygen or turbidity?
f. AltcTatjon o.f: the diTcction
or rate of fl0t·1 of ground ,.·~1tcrs?
g. Ckmr,c u1 the qu~mt:lt)' of
ground waters, either throuth
dfrcc t Ddcl-i ti 011s or ,.,. i thtl r:iw~l 1 s,
or through jntcrception of an
nquifer by cuts or cxG1vations?
h. lle:J11ct-ion in :-he amrii'mt 0£
water otl1cnFi :·.c 0\'~11 bblc for
puh) j c \\';1 tc r ~:;upp 1 j cs'!
.. z.
Yes No
...
';(
;x
,x
·--x
···••✓ _L2_ __
4. PJant Life. Will the proposal have signi-
fic~nt results in:
a. Change jn the diversity of
species, -or numbers of any species
of plants ( inc] uchng trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
aquatic plants)?
b. Re:xluction of t11c numbc:rs of
any urnql1c, rare or endangered
species of p1c1nts?
c. Introduction of new spc~1cs
-of plants i~1to an area, or in a
barrjc:r to the normal replenish-
ment of existi~1g species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
_agricultural crop?
S. Animal Life. Will -the proposal have sig11i-
Ifc:C-::int ·:results 111:
a. Changes in the diversity of
species> or nrer;b-.::Ts of any species
of [1;1im:1ls (b:i.1·ds, land ~mirnals
in:..luJing T8pb}cs, fis1) 8nd shell-
fish, benthic organisms, inscc.:s or
microfaw1a)?
1), Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, r,uc OT endangered
species of anjmals?
c. lntToduction of new spcc:i es
of an:iwals jnto un area, or result
in a h3Tricr to the migration or
1novcmcnt of nnirnals?
d. Detcrior~1Uon to existing
fish or wilc1l.ifc lwb:i tat?
6, ·Noise. Nil] the proposnl sjgni-
Iic:mtly incrc;1~;c cxist:ing noise
levels?
7. ·u Dht :md C1 :rre. wn 1 t])C pro-
posn I sjgnif.ic,intly prod11cc new
Hght. or glare?
8. Land lJqi. \\'il) the proposal h:ivc
s·.~·11T[TL~-.111t n·:--.111ts in th<' nl1c~rnt:ion
of t lw pre!;t~n t or pl:mncd 1 anJ u!;c of
rm ar<'a't
Yes No
X:
)(
9. Natural Resources. l'li 11 the pro-
posed have sjgnif.:icont results in:
a. Increase in the rote of use
of any natural resources?
b. Dcplctirni of any nonrcnc,..,able
natural Tcsourcc?
10. Risk of Upset. Docs the proposal
Involve a'· sig11ificmt risk of an
explosion or the release of haz-
ardous substances (including, but
nbt limited to, oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radfation) in the
event of an accident or upset
conch tions?
11. Po1~ulc1 tj on. Will the proposal
significantly alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth
rate of the lmmzm population of
an area?
12. Housing. l\'iJ.1 the proposal signi-
ficantJ)· affect existjng housing,
01 create a dcmz.nd for c1dclitional
• housing?
]3. Tra-11s~·t2tj on/Cii"cubtion. Will
the proposal have significant re-
sults in:
a. GcncTotion of additional
vehicu1ar movement?
b, Effects on cxjsting p:irkfog
fncil iti cs, • 01· dcm::md f 01' new
parking?
c. Impact upon cxisth1~ tnms-
portation S)'Stcms?
cl. Al tcr:1tions to prc~;cnt
patterns of t·h-cul:1tion or move~
1ncnt o,f pcopl c and/or gool1s?
c. Altcr;-ith)ns to waterborne,
rn:i.l or a:ir trnffic?
f, Jnc1~c:isc: :in tr,1 ffk h~z~1nl$
to mo1or V(•liiclc.:., hkycli~ts or
petlestr.ian:;?
Yes ~faybc No
)(
x
... y
····x.
··••·{
' '
I I
14. Public Scrvfrcs. 1~ill the pro-
pos~11 11::ivc ~1 sjgnif:icant effect
upon, or have sign if .i.Gm t rcsul ts
jn the nccx1 for nc\v or n.l tercel
govcn11ncntol scnrjccs in any of
the fol) b\dng c:ircas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
d, Parks or other recreational
:facilities?
e. Mainten;:incc of public facili-
ties, including roads?
f. · Other govcrnmcntn] sendccs?
15.' Energy. Will the proposal have·
significant results in:
a. Use of substantinl ,:imounts of
fud or cn~rgy?
b. Dcm,rnd 1-1pon. c-:xist:ing sources
of cnc.~r~'.Y, or reqm.rc the cl eve:: op-
1ncnt of nc,v sourccs of energy?
16. Utj]jtjcs. Will the proposal have.
signibc::int rcsul ts in the n~ed for
nc-w systc-ms, or aJtcrations to the
follm\'ing ut i 1i tics:
a,
b ..
c,
d.
e,.
f;.
Power or nc:1tura1 gas?
Communjcations systems?
Water'?
Sewer or septic t,mks?
Stonn watc1· drr.d n:igc7
Soljd w.istc nnd disposal;
17,. 1111111:111 llc:1Hh. Wi 11 the; proposal
l1avc ~p11111ic.:mt results in the
crcaho;~ o'r :my hcall h h;iz;1J"d or
potenti:tl hc:ilth ha:~;ud (cxcl11d.ing
1ncnt,1l hc:ilt.h)7
-s-
Yes Maybe
. ·.· ..
No
.•·x
-·· v __tl.--
. . { _ _f.;.__
t
X I
.. ,x
·---x
··-·x
-···X
18. Acstlictjcs. WilJ the propo:~DJ have
sj gnj f icant rc;uJ ts in the olJstruc.-
tj on of ~my scenic vis tu or vie\~·
open to the p11bJjc, or ,,•ill the pro-
posal result in the crczitjon of ~m
acstlictiG1l1y offensive site open
to puhli c v:i C\•;?
19. RccTcnt:io:1. l\'ill the propo~aJ have
signiJj cant rcsuJ ts in the impact
11pori the quJ1 j ty or qu;_intity of
cxisUnz rccrcation3l cpp'.:lrtunj tics?
20. Arcl1co]og:icnl/llist0Tical. \'.'ill the
'prorlo.s:J1 have s:ignihcant rcsul ts
in the a1tcration of a sjgnifie::mt
archco1ozica1 or histor:ic.JJ site,
structure, object or buiJcling?
Yes
21. ANALYZr YIArnx ALTl]-z"'.\\TJVES TC TFE PHOPOS[D PROJTJ:T SUCII AS: ----------------------~--------------.=i) P]F\~:;JJ) ])}~\,j],Cl}jf\l CF 'il;E Hm.TCT; b) 1\L:n:1r\::\iE ~Trr:
D)~s1·G','S. c· I Ji T 'J'}~1":>·\:f\T'c c:0 :\ 1 ]' r;r; l);-·\ 'Fl on-.11·:\''T. r1) 1·\L'.i'f'_.'t?'_,•J. •\'.l'", .~t. J. } ) ,....., .,,._,,_.,_ JJ_.., '--...,.____,~\.£.,_ V.1. ;,,.,___..._, , I_ .. 1 , .. J -.. 1,
USLS FOR IllE SITE; c) DL\T.LOP\iEYJ' /1J SC:-:1: HJTURF lDlE RA'JlTR
·nt~\ NCt!; f) ;\LTEm\:\lT. snrs FCR 'l1lI PR11?0'.3FD ll~:E; g) ;:O
PROJCCT J\LTU~\;\Tl\'E.
-6-
x-
Yes Maybe No
22. MANDATORY FfNDJNGS OF SJGNIFJCA1'\CE.
a) DOES Tiffi PROJECT l!AVE 1lfl2 POTf:N-.
TJAL TO DFGR/\DE TlTI.: QUi\LlTY OF
'll-IE ENV) R0~\11:NT, OR CURTAIL '111E
DIVERSITY IN Tl IE Ei\l\'IRO:--:ML\l'l'?
b) DOES 'Jln3 PROJECT I!AVE '111E POTEN-
TIAL 'JD J\C[ !TEVE SllORT-TERM, TO
'J1JE DlSATlVJ\NT/\GE OF LONG--TERM,
DNVIRO;,:•.j:~t{fAL GOALS? (A Sll0R'f-
'D2RM JJlP/\CT ON THE l:NVIRO;s;~.1ENT
IS O~E l',1IJCII occur~s ]NA RE-
LATTI'ELY BlUEF, Dl.TlNITIVE
PERIOD OF TDJE WHILE LONG-TER\1
IMPACTS WILL E~lJlTI~E 1\]JLL INTO
TI·IB FU'lURE.)
c) DOES 'HIE PROJ1:CT }I/\VE IJ-.H'ACTS
WHICH APJ~ INDIVIDUALLY LI:,llTED,
BUT cu:-.·rrJLATJVELY COi\SJDERABLE?
(A PROJECT ~lA'r 11'-lPACT ON ·n-:o
OR MORE SEI'ARJ\TE RESOURCES
WI-IBRE 'J.1!E H-H\-\CT 0~ EAC!I RE-
SOURCE JS RELATI\.1:LY S:·.~-\LL,
BUT l\1 !U~E THE EFFECT OF THE
TOTAL OF Tl-JOSE I?\ll'ACTS ON 1l1E
ENVIROX\lL'rf-JS SIG>ilFIG\NT.)
d) DOES TI-m PROJECT H'\VE ENVIRO,\l-
MENTAL EFFECTS 1fHTCil h'JLL
CAUSE StJBST1~\J'fJAL i\DVERSE
EfFECTS O>J I fU;\l/\N BETJ'\CS,
El11IER DIRl:CTLY OlZ l ;~DlHECTLY?
III.· DISCUSSTO?~ OF F\JVIROX;,_fENT1\L EVALUTIO?-J
T /2 t 4/tf' I,-c.:; N -:/ 17 r "'/7" s i!' s .Jo co N s-1-r,,, c-/ ~
)(
X
</v' / A;l 4 <-v; v/rt1,i I/ /4 s tf? "1 y 4 4 ~ ~ t/7 rt' V '~ "'5~Y
'o/"/'Y-' vi'/ T1----ilvt'/_/ Ct'A/-/;'l'r, _T/2r 'Ct/:/'l 1<'~,N-/ c/4,/,,.,,,s-
.;.,,{qJ -1-1,(_1,prc,;?c-St'/ t.t,,,N/,.,_,·1l u_,,,/11 Str/1' .. (y /c-:-·J.-o __ ,-"
c, f: -l;{r &f.c~r.i"C4 /eN✓ Y-j,Y >-"e',f "tir,.,/ tfy -1-A/~5
f)r-o/~c~ •
l
. ·-... _ ..
i !
·i
IV. DE'n:PMH;AT]():L (,TO BE co;-.1pJ,E'11J) BY 'llfE PLJ\NNING r>EPARD1[NT) -------''
On tlic lxisis of this initfal evaluation:
X I find the proposed proj cct COULD i\'OT h:nT a sj gni {'frant
effect on the environment, rnxl a :NEC.J\.TIVE Dl.:CI...:\R/\TlO;~ will
be prepared.
I fjncl that although the proposed project c~uld have a
sip,n:ific:mt effect on the environment, tlici·c \·,ill not be
a sir,nifica:nt effect in this case bcc:ausc the mitigation
measures tk.scribcd on an attached sheet kwe been acldc<l
to the project. A condition~1l negative declaration 1·:ill
will be prepared.
I fjncl the pToposcd project H!\Y hJ.ve a signi fj cant: effect
on th~ cnviron:ncnt, and an l:.';-\VIR0\.\1ENTAL IMP,\CT REJJOiff
is required.
Date: ~6
Signature
V. MITIGATING J\lE!\SUlzES (If. APPLIGI\BLE)
-9-
.......
MITTC'✓\Tl ;-,:c; Mr·ASURES (Continued)
nns IS TO CERTIFY 1l!AT l }l/\VE RE\TJE\\l2D 11lE ABOVE NITIG.'\TIONG MEA-
SURES AND co:·{CUR h}TH TIIE 1\l1DIT10); OF '11-E~SE ME,\SlJRES TO 'iHE PROJECT.
Date: ---------------. Signature oi: J\pplicm1t
-10-
---
IV. DE11]~\ll})/\TJO:-!. (,TO l\E co~n)LE'll]) BY 'lllE PI.ANNING ])EPAR1NENT) ---·---''
On tl1c basis of this initL-11 evaluation:
JS_ I find the proposed proj cct COULD NOT bn-: o. s j r,ni :[j c.:mt
effect on the environment, a11d a. l\TEGATIVE DECJ.AR\TION will
be prcpo.rcd.
I find that although tl1c proposed project c9uJ d have a
sir,11ificmt effect on the cnvironn:cnt, thcJ'-c:? \·:ill not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures clcscribcd on an a tt:ichcd sheet h::ivc been ticlccd
to the project. A conditional negative declaration will
will be prepared.
l find the proposed project :t,li\Y h2vc a significant effect
on th~ environment, and an ENVIRO\.\lE;\"fJ\L IMPACT REPORT
is required.
Signuture
V. 'MITIGATING MEASURES (IJ.'!' APPLIC/\BLE)
•'
-EXHIBIT A
~EGAL DESCRIPTION
All that portion of Lot Hof Rancho Agua Hedionda, in the City
of Carlsbad, County of San Diego, State of California, accord~
ing to map thereof No. 823 filed in the Office of the County-
Recorder of San Diego County, that ·is within the following de-
scribed boundary:
Commencing at the Southeasterly corner of Carlsbad Tract No. 72-3
according to map thereof No. 7492 filed in the Office of The
County Recorder of San Diego County. Thence South 67°31'40" West
(South 67°30'38" West per Map 7492) along the South line of said
Carlsbad Tract No. 72-3 a distance of 302.39 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING; thence continuing along the aforementioned South-
erly line of Carlsbad Tract No. 72-3 South 67°31'40" West a
distance of 400.00 feet to the Easterly Right-of-Way line for
Interstate Highway I-5; thence the following bearings and dis-
tances along aforementioned Easterly Right-of-Way: South 26°10'0011
East 68.00 feet; (South 26°10'25" East 67.96 per Carlsbad Tract
No. 72-3); thence South 25°10'12" East 300.04 feet (South
25°12 1 42 11 East 300.04 per I-5 Right-of-Way Map LO 3775); thence
South 26°4r'12" East 900.06 feet; thence South 33°45'41" East
151.33 feet; thence South 41°32'36" East 207.42 feet; thence
South 45°41'14" East 583.20 feet (South 45°41'1811 East 583.55
feet per I-5 Right-of-Way Map LO 3772); thence South 74°05'19"
East 171.01 feet (South 74°05'19" East 169.57 feet per I-5 Right-
of-Way Map LO 3772) to the Northerly Right-of-Way line of Palomar
Airport Road as shwon on Road Survey 1534; thence South 87°50'23 11
East along said Northerly Right-of-Way 265.64 feet to the Westerly
line of that certain easement for public road as described in a
deed to the City of Carlsbad, recorded December 30, 1972 as File
No. 320458; thence North 2°09'37" East along said Westerly line
177.31 feet (North 2°09'55" East 176.97 feet per said file No.
320458) to the beginning of a tangent 557.00 foot radius curve
concave Westerly; thence Northerly and Westerly along said curve
through a central angle of 76°13'54" for an arc distance of
741. 08 feet; thence leaving said curve along a non tangent line.. . ....
North 22° 29' 22" West, 105. 49 feet, to the Northerly line of afore-··~-· ~ ~--•
mentioned public road as described in said file No. 320458,:~·>.-::··~·--.~ _ _. .. ;. -~
radial at said point bears South 10°04'39" West, also being the··;;~t :·_· ~ :.
beginning of a nontangent 643. 00 radius curve concave Southerly;-{:!·i" !: -•. ·,:
thence Westerly along said road easement through a curve·_witl(a:{:;~~~i_;_:\:_.~:._·· ...
central angle of 4°43'15• for an arc distance of 52.98 feet~_to·~a.(~:.-:..:,· :,. _
point of tangency; thence continuing along said road easement.~!~-, .!~;. -, _: _-_-;·
North 84°38'36" West 239.30 feet ·to the·beginning of:,.a 557.00~--•::·:.:: \-;:;---~::-:·r
foot radius tangent curve concave Northeasterly; thence Westerly :·:
and Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 88°08'1811
for an arc distance of 856.84 feet to a point of tangency; thence
North 3°29'42" East a distance of 297.85 feet (North 03°30 1 00•
East 296. 12 per file· -No. 320458) to the beginning of a 643. 00 f~~t ~----· •
radius tangent curve concave Westerly; thence Northerly along .. ~.
said curve through a central angle of 25°58'23• for an arc dis~~--:~
tance of 291.48 feet to a point of tangency; thence North_22°25'02"
West 2.84 feet (North 22°29•22• West 4.38 per file No. 320458) to
THE POINT OF BEGI~'"NING.
Containing 18.8 acres more or less.
=~--------------
"'·';"' ...... ('""' ,c) ----•tlftJ,,,., .. 1,u1,1,c1
'""'""". !,,oev,c, /-,,...,l,d iJ<> {-.,,<l'IHO,
ro,ol , .. lie~,.. 10,1,tl,' 1::,::•:~:::;~: loO , • .._ .. •, '"'""" ~r •"'" ;o ,.,.of,,..,,< 'I""',,.,
-., • l~•l_~l• 1111 ,..,,;, ,..,,,
r..,1,.,..., ""''"' 0'"•'"-d 21, •~••-••
.,..,, ~,.. 1,000 •-'
!••••• .. 'O'ls"O~ JOO >,f, OU ,po<rl
T<trol C.--••nultP'•'•"'-'"' 8,.,,., ,,. __ ,_ •~«.,; ,..._ ,-..... ,,.., ·••« -~ !
•1· •Ill',_,~,'"'-9"' •-,,..,.,, ""' ~ ,_ .,.a, ··~·"• ••'"'<• J '""'"'
s-, .. s_,,,.11d ::~::•:9,;~<411~:;~;;.,,,1 1.soo,,
1,000,., ),000,.f
To .. l '"""< ArH l,SOC ,.I (,,...,,,.. -w•••• o<l ,,,..u, •, •••« .. , oacn Sil,.!,.,., oul>I•< ,1..,, ., .. _,,,..,,.,.)
-• (~ jl{}:,6 Ir. QOll) • lO """'•< ,ouo,
1 .. 1_,.,.,,.,,.,,,,._. •S•<>K••
lotol .._,_,..,, '""''"'
PEA SOUP
\
\
ANDERSEN'S -CARLSBAD
750 SEAT RESTAURANT, 150 UNIT MOTEL, CONVENIENCE STORE, SERVICE STATION AND ill SEAT GOURMET RESTAURANT(FUfURE)
i
$
~ ,;:. ,.. -.
1' • DO•O'
CJ
KFIU!a ■R ■■N ■■N
Allc:IHIT■OT■ A.IA
Zl ■M ■R
--ftol C .......... AIA• DDNAI-D H ■■ ... ■■N AUt.• -••■--AIA 'l."l ,.. .. v ·'IA..-:c J,,._ !I•-t••.t.f ~~ -i; ·j;;,';.• .~~ ~
• '" J ~..... ',.., (" '9
1t'· • -· -I
' " '1 •• ,6-· -.. . ,7,?" ----
• \,1~,f ~-
. -r
) .i-'
;
\ \
PEA SOUP
I
II!. Q " Cl
ANDERSEN'S CARLS BAD
750 SEAT RESTAURANT, ISO UNIT MOTEL, CONVENIENCE STORE, SERVICE STATION AND 125 SEAT GOURMET RESTAURANT(FUTUREJ
KRUll ■R ■■N ■■N Zl ■M ■A
AIIOHl1'■CT• A.IA
'' .~-; '"l!i' ~ A.J"' "K (s... ~,,..-,