Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-03-11; Planning Commission; ; CUP 196 - CRISMAN/MONTESSORI SCHOOLDATE: TO: FROM: STAFF REPORT March 11, 1981 Planning Commission Planning Department SUBJECT: CUP-196 -CRISMAN -Request for a conditional use permit to allow a Montessori School with extended day care on the east side of Madison Street between Elm Avenue and Oak Avenue in the R- P zone. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to develop a Montessori School on two parcels with a combined area of .32 acre, located as previously described. One of the lots is presently occupied by an older duplex, which will be utilized for classroom purposes, while the other is occupied by a small residential type structure which will be utilized as an office for the school. The applicant pro- poses to provide the required playground area behind the office and in front of the classroom building. Children attending this school will range from 2½ to 6 years in age. The applicant has indicated that there will be a maximum enrollment of 64 students attended by 6 employees. The proposed school will be operated between 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. with staggered shifts to reduce traffic congestion caused by the loading and unloading of students. II. ANALYSIS Planning Issues 1. Can the four findings required for the granting of a Conditional Use Permit be made which are as follows: a) That the requested use is necessary or desir- able for the development of the community, is essentially in harmony with the various ele- ments and objectives of the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located; b) That the site for the intended use is ade- quate in size and shape to accommodate the use; 8H c) That all of the yards, setbacks, walls, fences, landscaping, and other features necessary to adjust the requested use to existing or permitted future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and maintained; d) That the street system serving the proposed use is adequate to properly handle all traffic generated by the proposed use. III. DISCUSSION As conditioned, it appears that the proposed Montessori School with extended day care can meet the four findings required for the issuance of a conditional use permit. There is a need for additional pre-schools and day care centers in the city of Carlsbad due to the city's rapidly growing population and the greater number of working women. The applicant claims that they have a waiting list of approxi- mately 200 parents who would like to send their children to the proposed school. Since the proposed school is sur- rounded on three sides by commercial or office uses, it should not have a detrimental effect on the existing uses in the neighborhood. The site appears to be adequate in size and shape to accomo- date the proposed use. As shown on Exhibit A, and condi- tioned in Planning Commission Resolution No. 1781, all of the yards, setbacks, fences, parking spaces and other fea- tures necessary to adjust the requested use to existing and future uses in the neighborhood will be provided and main- tained. One of staff's main concerns was that adequate classroom and playground area be provided. Previously the staff has used the figure of 35 square feet of usable class- room space and 75 square feet of playground area per student for pre-school children. Also, as shown on Exhibit 11 A11 , the applicant will be able to provide three on-site parking spaces for the use of the six employees. The Engineering Department recently made a traffic count on Madison Street near its intersection with Elm Avenue. This count indicated that Madison Street is underutilized at the present time and should have no problem handling the pro- posed school. Traffic congestion generated by dropping off and picking up students is a major concern. However, as shown on Exhibit "C", the school will be operating on a staggered shift which will reduce the potential for traffic congestion caused by parents picking up and discharging students. As shown on Exhibit 11A11 , parents will be able to drop their students off in the alley behind the school or via the driveway in front of the school. -2- IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Planning Director has determined that this project will not have a significant impact on the environment and there- fore has issued a Negative Declaration dated February 13, 1981. V. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt Resolution No. 1781, APPROVING CUP-196 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. ATTACHMENTS PC Resolution No. 1781 Background Data Sheet Location Map Exhibits A -c, dated February 24, 1981 Disclosure Form Environmental Documents MH:jt 2/24/81 BACKGROUND DATA SHEill' CASE NO: QJP-J96 APPLICANT: CARLSBAD SCHOOLS/JEFF CRISMAN REQUFST AND u:x::ATION: Operate a M::>ntessori School with extended day care center east side of Madision ~~en Elm Avenue and Oak Avenue. LEGAL DESCRIPI'ION: I.ots 7 and 8 in Block 48 of carlsbad according to Ma;e thereof· :t'b. 535 filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May 2, 1888 Assessors Parcel Number: _ _,.,2,.,.0_3_· _ 351 4 and 5 Acres 14,000 sq. ftNo. of L::>ts --=2=------- GENERAL PIAN AND ZONING General Plan Land Use Designation RMH-0 -------- Density All™ed _______ _ Density Proposed Existing Zone ___ R_-P _________ _ Surrounding Zoning and Land Use: zoning North C-2 ----- South ____ R--_p __ _ Fast R-P ----- West R-P ----- Proposed Zone Land Use Coorrercial UupJex Conmercial Ccmnercial PUBLIC FACILI'l'IES Carlsbad Carlsbad -------- --------- School District Water District Sewer District ___ Car.:..=:..:l..::s.;.:.bad.;....;... __________ .EDU's _ ___.N...,/t-JA~---- Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated _ __._M...:...,i:;;,A .... ti .... l. __ ~ ..... • .___4: .......... ,---=--ltf .... e __ , ______ _ (Other: ______________________________ ) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT --=X----Negative Declaration, issued Fehruru::y 13, 1981 Log No. OJP-J 96 E.I.R. Certified, dated -------------- Other,-------------------------------- LOCATION MAP _J _l --- 7 -~· .__ ________ _, ~ r: ...l b.1 CASE NO. C..U P ICJ~ APPLICANT C.Ptl&MA-~ I ' .• If after the information you hGve submitted has been ~v~cw:d, it is determined that furth~r informc1tion 1---,quired, you will be so v1.se • APPLICMi'l': Carlsbad Scbools Ioc {corporatiqo) ~e (individual, partnership, Joint venture, corporation, syndicc\tion) AGENr: MENIBRS: 740 Pi oe 4vem,e, CarJ shad, ca, 920p8 Business M~ress (j14) 434-4161 Telephone Number Jeff Crisman Name Po Box 624, carJsbad, ca, 92008 Business Address (.714) 129-4082 Telephone Number ParoeJa J, Crjsman Name (individual, partner, joint venture, corporation, syndication) 740 pi.ne Avem,e, Carl shad, Ca, 92008 Business Address (ZJ4)" 434-4161 Telephone Number Name Busines~ Address Telephone Number 3485 Valley~treet, Csd. Jlome Address- Telephone Number Home Address Telephone Numb~ (Attach more sheets if necessary) I/f/1e declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis- clo$ure is true and correct and that it wiil remain true and correct and may be relied upon as being true and correct until amended. Ap,12l1cant Pamela J. Crisman Director Owner, Partner .. .. FEE $10u 00 . ru:c~nP'!' NJ~ _ / 7 tJ~( ENVIRONMENTAL lMPACT ASSBSSMENT F0RM •• Part I 1/r~ (To be Conq:,_ete<l by A?FLICA1YC --.. ----- DK'£• • • J.an .. .10,_198...._ __ _ Applh:e.11·;~ • CarJ s.bad-Sc.boo.4-.inc. Cl!!A Ga~-s-ead-Metlte-ss-or; -Schoo--------- Adrl.re!:s of .\~.mlicar1t: 740 Pine Avenue, Carlsbad ... _ ------·-----·--------- --------------·------·---------------- Name, address and phone numbeT of person to be contacted (if other than Applicant): ~ff-~ma.o.-e...O,Bax 624, ..c.a..r:.~ad, (714) 729 4082 ·GENERA.L INFORMATION: Montess~~i School with extended Day Care_· _____ _ ,. . .. P,:-oj cct Location/ Address:·. 307_0·• Madi SOR Sticeet, Carl shad 1~ Assessor Parcel Number: _20_3 ___ -35~ -4 & 5 Zone cf Subject Property: Proposed Use of Site: Operate a Mwtessori Scb00J wit~ ext&Aeee aay care 'Proposed use to be for classrooms and pJaygrauod fm1ctior:1s List all other applicable applications related to this project: ND 1 2. Describe the activity area, inciuding-distinguishing natural and manmade characteristics:. al$O provide precise _slope analysis when appropriate. Property is a level 14;000 Sq. Foot lot wliich fronts on Madison-Street and has alley ~ess to rear of property. . • 3. Describe energy conservation measures· incorporated into the design and/or operation of the project. (For a more specific discussion of·energy conservation requirements see of the City's EIR Guidelines} . . • ~J( Propose~ use wil 1 be for existing buildings and will "necessitate the ·construction of other facilities. 4. If residential, include the number o:f units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected . . N/A 5. • If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood,. city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, a~d loading ~aciljties. 6. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per· shif~, and loading facilities. N/A. ~ . 7. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated -occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. -. Private School with extended Day Car~ , • Occupancy is set·at 64 Students total pe_rsonnel will be 6, there will be 3 dropoff locations none of which will be on public roads (2 in _alley·and one on property). • I. ENVIRONMENTAL ·rMPACT ANALYSIS Answer the following questions by placing a chedc • in· the· appropriate space. (Discuss all items chcckedyes~ Attach. additional sheets as necef;sary) .. 1) 2) 3) 4) Could the project significantly change presept ·1and_uses in the vicinity of t~e.activity? Could the activity affect the .use of a rec- reational area, or area of important··· aesthetic value? Could the activity affect the functioning of an established cow.munity or neighborhood? Could the activity result in the displacement of community residents? 5)' Could the activity increase the number of low :and modera~e cost housing units in the city? 6) Could the activity decrease the number of low and modest cost housing units in the city? 7) Are any of the natural or man-made features j,n the activity area uniq·.:e, that is, not : found in other parts of the County, State, ·or Nation? 8) Could the activity signi_ficantly affect a historical or archaeological site or its settings? 9) Could the activity significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conservation of a scarce natural resource? • 101· Does the activity area serve as a habitat, food source nesting place, source'of water, etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish species? 11) Could the activity significantly affect fish, wildlife or plant life? ·12) Are there any rare or endangered plant species in the activity area?. 13) Could the activity change existing features of any of the city's lagoons, bays, or • tidelands? -3- YES NO X X -x x X X X x X X X • ----- 14) Could the activity change existing featur0s of any of the city's beachez? 15}-Could· the activity result in the erosion or el~m.ination of agricul-tural lands? 16)· Could the activity serve to encourage develop- ment of presently undeveloped areqs or intesify development of already developed areas? 17). Will the activity require a variance from established enviroru~ental standards (air, water, noise, etc)? 18) Will the activity require certificatio~, authorization or issuance of a ·permit by any .local, state or federal environmental control agency? 19_) Will the activity require issuance of a variance or conditional use permit by the city? 20) Will the activity involve the application, use, _or disposal of potentially hazardous materials? _21) . Will the activity involve construction of ~acilities in a flood plain? 22) wi•11 the activity invcl ve construction of f~cilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater? 23) Will the activity involve construction of facilities in the area of an active fault? 24)" Could the act1vity result in the generation of significant amounts of noise? 25} • Could the activity re·sult in the generation of significant amoun~s of dust? • 26} Will the activity involve the burning of brush, trees, or other materials? 27} Could the activity result in a significant change in the quality of any portion of the . region's air or water resources? (Should note, surface, ground water, off-shore). 28) Will the project substantially increase fuel consumption· (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)? 29) Wi.11 there be a. significant ch:ange to existing land form? -4- )( X ----- X X X X X X X X X . . ·x .. - )( X • (a}. indicate ·estimated grading to be.done in cu:bic yards (b) percentage of alteration to the present land form. maximum height of cut or fill slopes _______________ NIA 30) Will the activity result in substantial increases i~ the use of utilities, sewer~,.drains, or .• 31) streets? I!> the activity carried out as part of a iarge:i::· project or series of projects? • .... -- x· Cla~s~ooms as established will be an increase neede·d Location at 740 Pine Ave., Carlsbad by the main School ,· . -s- -NBNE--- NONE . . . . " .. II. STATF.MENT OF NON~SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS -....... --· --- If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section I but you think the activity will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below: 19). Conditional Use Permit is the reason for this application III~ CQ\1MENTS OR ELABORATIONS TO ANY ·op .'IHE QUESTIONS. IN SECTION I (If additional space is needed for answering any questions attach. additional sheets as may be needed).. Date Signed Jan, 10, 1Q81 -6- (To Be Complct.cd By TI1e PLANNING DEPJ\R'IMENT) C.ASE NO. DATE: 1/.lf/f I. . ----''-'~--'---------- 2. . ADDRESS AND P!!OA'E NUMBER OF .APPLICANT: /'. 0., 6 o-,X--~ ). f' ---'---~---'~..:;_,;,---~-- c e. y-/s-/e./1 .c~ , ? ;i 003 -------------,,-------------~----- 3. DATE CHECKLIST SUBMITTED:· • / //f /f / -------------------- II. • El\1VIROl'~-1ENTlJ~ Ti\IPACTS (EX.PLAX,\TJG:'~S OF ALL AFFIRI,Ji\TIVE A1'-lSf.1~RS ARE TO BE • l\'RI'JTEN UNDER Section III -DISCUSSION OF BNIROx,H:i'rf!\L EVALUATION) ,e. 1. ·na,:th Will the· proposal have signi - ficani"'-icsults in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in cl1anges in geologic substruct.urcs? h. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? ·c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. 111e destruction, covering or 1noclification of nny unique geologic or physical fcatuTcs? e .. Any jncrcasc in wind or water erosion of soils, ci ther on 01· off the site? £. C.11::mgcs in deposition or ·ero- sion of beach ~ands, or changes in siltation, depo~~it·j on or erosion which may mod.i f y the ch:rnncl of a r:i.vcr or stream o·f thli hcJ or the .occnn or m,y hny, inlet or lake? ·yes • Maybe ··x .. v .. .-A- Ml? 2. Air: Will the proposnl have s~gni- rcsul ts in: • • • a. Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, mositure or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally .or regionally? • 3; Water: Will the proposal have · s igi - :ficant results in: a.. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water move- ments, in either marine or fresh waters? .,; b. Changes· in absorption rates, drainage pntterns, or the rate and runount of surface water runoff? c. Alteration~ to the course or flow of flood waters? cl.. Chcmge J.n the amount of sur~ face water in any water body? c. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface 1-1atcr quality, inrluding but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. AltcTation of the direction or rate of flow o;f ground waters? g. Ch,mgc in the quantity of • ground waters, either through • direct ndditions or ,-dthdrr1.wals, or through interception of an aquifer by-cuts or cxc~vations? h. RcducU01i in the nmoimt of wntcr othcrwi!~c avnilablc for public water supplies? ... z .. Yes· Maybe No ·~ X -· ··x --- )( .. X ··x ····y· , ..... 4. Plant Lif c. Will the proposal have signi- ticant results in: a. Change in the diversity of species, -or numbers of any speci~s of plants ·(including trees, shn1bs, grass, crops, niicroflora and aquatic plants)?. b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new spedes . of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- men~ of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any _agricultural crop? 5. • ".Animal Life. Will· the proposal have signi-· f icant results in: a. Changes in the diversity of· species, or numbers of any species of animals (binls, land ai1imals in~luding reptiles, fish and shell:.. fish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the mnnbcrs of any unique, rare or endangered species of anjmals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a lxnrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat'? 6. • ·Noise, Will the proposal signi- ficantly increase cxistjng·noisc levels? 7. 'Light :md Gl:rrc. Will the pro~ posal sign.i ficantly produce new light or glare? 8. Lnncl Use. Will the proposal have sigi1iTfcant re!,lt"l ts in tlw :11.t,~rnt::ion of tho present or planned 1 .rnll use of nn area? ·Yes Maybe No .-. X L X .. ·'f. -f- ·_J_· • 9. Natural Resources. Will the pro- posal have significant results in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 10. Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a significant risk of an explosion or the release of haz- • ardous substances (including, but _ not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. P?pu~a~ion. Will the proposa~ significantly alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal signi- Iicantfy affect existing housing, 01 create a demand for additional· • housi:11-g? 13. • ·Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal have significant re- sults in: a. Generation of additional vehicular movement? b, Effects on existing p:irking facilities, • or demand for new parking? • c. Impact upon cxist:i~1g trans~ por.tation systems? d. Altcrntions to present patterns of cJ1·cul:ition or movc.- 111cnt of: pcop_1 c and/or goods? c. Alterations to waterborne, 1·ni.l or uir traffic? f, Incn~ase :in trnf(k liaz:irds to 1notor V<-'h.icJcs, hkyclists or pcdcstr;imrn7 Yes Maybe No ··--x _··-i ... 't/. ....£.. __ ·····'/ ····)( .. 14. Public Scrv::iccs. Will the pro- posal k1vc a significant effect _upon> or have significant results in the need for new or altered governmental scnrices in any of the following area~: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. School;;? d. Parks or other recreational j;acilitics? ' e. Maintenance of public facili- ties, including roads? f .. Other governmental services? 15.' Energy. Will the proposal have· signiricant results in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the deve::..op- ment of new souTces of energy? 16. • Utilities. Will the proposal have. significant results in the need for new systems, or altcTations to the following utilities: a, b .. c. d. e .. Power or natural gas7 Communications systems? Water? Sewer or septic tanks? Stol1n water drainage? SoUd wnstc nnd disposal7 17.,. lhunan lll'nlth. Will the propos:il fol\le sign1gTc~mt results jn the crc.:itjon of .my health hnz.:inl or potential hca 1th ha~~nnl (cxc.lud ing 1nc.~111· ,tl hen l th) ? -s- Yes Maybe No ··J_ ··J_ ··1- ··i ··L ··2._ ····X ... 18. Acsthctjcs. Will the proposal hnve sfgnificm1t results in the obstruc- tjon of any scenic vista or view op~n to the public, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public vie,;;? Yes J.A.aybc No .. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal have sfgni:Cicant results in the impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20 .. Archcolo~ical/Historical. Will the proposal have significant results in the alteration of a significant archcological or historical site, structure, object or building? 21. AlmYzr VIAl3LF. ALTERN,\TIVES TO 11-lE PROPOS[D PROJECT SUCH AS: ' a) PHI\SElJi)E\:D.OJ;MEX'f' OF 'lllE PROJECT; h) AL'!l:R\:A'it SITE • DESIGNS; c) ALTElt'-!ATE SCALE OP DEVELOPMENT; cl) ALTERi\!J\TE USES FOR 11-lE SITE; e) DEVELOPi'-JE~rr AT ·SO;-\E fUTURE TIME RA'n-:1:R •nt.\\l NOW; f) ALTERNATE SITES fOR 11-lE PROPOSED USE; g) KO PROJECT ALTEH.1~ATIVE. /l,t' §t,,,~·-rcl I' >-~,,,,1y ,~ r;~c"'"I'/"/ ~ 4·.-.. olcltr .s i~J(, .fe.,.,,,1, Y"..! //1/V/'e aN/ L'~/0..Y • f-Ji,,f r~u/c/ I~ ce-~liw ,,..,/_. f, I, ,,,_/t//z.~/ ~s Ye Nf-. I i,,t1t,/fs, -11~ ...,,~v,;, J"I,, '$' c:.,_,,,// ~ / -~ ., f-AI' 0 -~ rA i ,v-J ~ ,v, y1, i 't ,,ss r,v,/V"e re' '/ 'V~~// IA /.,,.~ -s·e~e-tl/1. .. -6- ... 22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICA1'1CE. a) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE TI-IE POTEN-· TIAL TO DEGRADE THE QUALITY OF 'Il-JE ENVIRONMENT, OR QJRTAIL 1HE DIVERSITY IN THE ENVIRONMENT? b) DOES 1HE PROJECT HAVE 'IHE POTEN- TIAL TO ACHIEVE SIDRT-TERM, 10 THE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG-TERM, ENVIRONMENTAL GOALS? (A SHORT- TERM IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS ONE \\HICH OCCURS IN. A RE- LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE PERIOD OF TIME WHILE LONG-TERM IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL IN'IO THE FU11JRE. ) c) DOES THE PROJECT HAVE IMPACTS WHICH ARE INDIVIDUALLY LIMITED, BlIT CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE? (A PROJECT MAY IMPACT ON TI\1'0 OR MORE SEPARATE RESOURCES WHERE THE ThlPACT ON EACH RE- SOURCE IS RELATIVELY SMALL, BlIT WHERE THE EFFECT OF THE TOTAL OF 'IHOSE IMPACTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT IS SIGNIFICANT.) d} DOES THE PROJECT HAVE B.1VIRON- MENTAL EFFECTS WHICH WILL CAUSE SUBST.ANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS ON Hrn,tt\N BEINGS, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY? III.· IiISCUSSIOt\T OF R.WIRONMENTAL EVALUTION I Yes Maybe No .x X x. 11Je tf.5t' &-f 1-~is s/le ~.s ..r. ,'Y,-sc.J110/ ,.,.,.j f,I, y/rox,·,-,~f 6 Y s/,,.,ft,v Is u,v,/ o ~ n/'74)'1'1'S . '-~"'// 3 eN l'r,,71' .-.✓~',L.,~,., .. / f-;e. f.f;c. t>N 111~/J'je-N .Stu.fl c/o.se lo f,i~ iN/erseche-,v e, f" /11~//se.111 5'fy~~t 1,,v,I £/r1 #v~NIAt'~ Th r .E/V'Ji711-e~l i/V / • J)~,, y-f /f1 (~ f l,e. S }' t'('t' ~ -If . Ce>,-,/ /t' -n,/ iff f 1'4 ~°h-C Ce If .N 'r /t>y fl,/:s. l'cy.;J.;6,v ,-,c /l?A,/;Ji,,v st,..,~r. Thls 7'Y4t~f/c c () "'lfrl f N ,I; c "'f ,,,' T ,/,. -f /'1 ~ ,l,-s e, w s I,-.," I /s IAIV,/,Y l,fl/J.i'2-e,I' .,,, f f"A~ /7Y-t'.St'N'T f.1,.,I' 4~,/ sA., ~/✓- /e ,r /k f <> .-f4 N,I /r f Ae_ 1 _ 41,t' ,(; f 10 ,v,, / f ,-,.-fi',-e J 1,., 0 ,. /1 / DISaJSSION OF ENVIRONMEi'ITAL EVALUATION (Continued) ~Y f /,is IA St, s)~ ff. {/tis f)4 ,' • tA" ~,1111c411/f C4ftJ t:1~s1111~lt .,--sft,1//pf 17fc/v. 4 N/ ,t'.,~17/!>'rf' 4c-.)"jd.W.J fe-r"1i N /,.., i -z..t • "' /II 7 Ct? Ill Ilic /s W' / r 1 // C, 7 C iJ ·5 Is O y /~ ~~ .5 f ;-/"1 Iv s. • • ~ -8-. • --• IV. DETERMINATION. (~'O BE COMPLETED llY 'll IE PLANNING DEPAR1NENT) --------,-.. On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a sjr,nifjcant effect on the environment,· and a N'EGATIVE DECLARATION will be ·prepared. I find that although the proposed project c~uld have a significi:lnt effect on the environment, there ,vill not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation l!leasures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A conditional negative declaration will will be prepared. I find the proposed project JviAY have a significant,·effect on th,e environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. .. ~//Jr~ SJ.gnature V. MITIGATING ~mASURES (IF APPLICABLE) -9-• • ·-. ·- >' • .. ' MITIG/\TH!G MEASURES (Continued) .... · ----•·--___ ,. __ , __ ·-. -·--·-•···•--·~··-··· -··- . . Vl • 'APPLICA1~T 'CONCURRENCE 'WITH MITIGATING MEASURES 'IHIS IS TO CERTIF'{ Tilt\T I HAVE RINIE\\'ED TI-IE ABOVE MITIGATJONG MEA- SURES AND CONCUR '\'uTH TilE ADDITION OF TI-IESE :t-.lEl\SURES TO TIIB PROJECT. Date: ------------.Signature of Applicant -10- I I ! i • I ..• 1200 El.M AVENUE CARLSBAD, CALIFOnNIA 92008 NOTICE OF.DETERMINATION 1416 Ni.nth Street TELEPHONE: _(7t4i 729,1181 County of San Diego 220 l\'est Broadway Scm.Diego, CA 92101 Room 1311 -·--·-·-· ··-· ··--··-•-·'""----.... ---·--·--------- __ Sacramento, CA 95814 ' ... ·----··--· -. ---·-· --. --·-· ---. -· .. -----. This is to advise that the City of Carlsbad_ on -------------• approved the following project: ___ ______ _ _ _________ . Project Description: ----------------------------- .I .... .... .Project ~daress/Location:_· ___________ -=-_·_•_·_·_·_·_·_· _· ·_· ___ ...;..__ TI1e. City made the follmving detenninations regarding the environmental • impact of the above described project: l. .The project will) the environment. ___ will _not, Jrnve a significant effect on 2. • • • • An Env:ironmcntal Impact Report w:is prepared for ·this proj<?ct pursuant to the provisions of CEQJ\. ·' 3. Mitigntion measures were; were not, made a condition of the npproval of the proJcct. --- 4. A stntcmcnt of Overriding Considerations was; was not,• ------auoptcd for this•projcct. . S. ---The Project went through prior environmental review or was part of a lnrgcr ·project which \\'cnt through prior enviroruncntnl review. ND S re 2 ...... :. . ·- " . .. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION (Continued) A copy of tJ1e __ Negative Declaration -~EIR ·with supporting document is available for public review at the Planning Department, Cit-y Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008. DATE: CASE NO: APPLICANT: ND 5 PC 2 •• SIGNED: J.AMF:S C. HI\Gl\Ml\N Planning Director City of Carl_sbad -' • . , STATt /. CALIFORNIA-HEALTH AND WELFARE AGE~:' REPORT· OF FIELD VISIT The State Department of Social Services and delegated agencies are required under the California Health and Safety Code to provide facilities with a written report of the results of the licensing visit. Code references below are from Title 22, California Administrative Code. for further explanation see other side. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES Reply to: • 0 Facility /})}.~A Q.OY\ 'lYl trf\,Qo ~'1K\& Date I-(G,-? I Facility No, 31 0 'aa f '-19 Address 30k>a et ~ (\~lfY) Facility Type ~cl-, C .. .t,SldJ.~ 8-1 Cc, . COMMENTS/DEFICIENCIES RECOMMENDATIONS/CORRECTIONS C ~ v• u -' ' _.., <-v r I 0 ..JL , rt::f::t:,~ (\ ( f O ,• J?. (i 3. Review Copy &•5'52-880 9-78 100M TII IP' © 18W OSP' STATE .<J; CAllFORNIA-HEALTH AND WELFARE AGr..w...:cy R.EP.ORT OF FIELD VISIT The State Department of Social Services and delegated agencies are required under the California Health and Safety Code to provide facilities with a written report of the results of the licensing visit. Code references below are from Title 22, California Administrative Code. For further explanation see other side. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES Reply to: Facility ~J..~ dY\ l(Nm"tt,o ,Q/11; Date /-( G-Z:} Facility No._3r-]f--'-O~l[b-=--.c.1.'"""""( 4~<l-+----- Address 3 0 (o9. :/J'\A& /4),iJ::Y:', Facility Type '£~ COMMENTS/DEFICIENCIES RECOMMENDATIONS/CORRECTIONS I a,) .,., • « , k"[J._ ' ' • ,r • ·o· , .c-" tt·~1 ., .-.~ ... ,, vv a/'·(, -•.. 1 y . . .1, o.~b ,,; ...... ,. r, / •• 1 v1l'1fa v;/, • -1' 1>'. r , >!.rl -.::,.: ti -\ I .,,, :, p_ ~~~ ,,, 1 :.,_ q 0, < 0 Licensing Evaluator Date Facility Representative Date 3. Review Copy 645!5-2-B80 9-71 tOOM TRIP© leW 05~ J • I I I l \ \ i i / / . --,-----,,-.-------, M E'... )( \ '::YT I N C:::.7 e,u11-01r•ly Pi\RKING SPACE 3 A c:::, ALLE'Y IOC>. 00 ( r l\l liJ G!,TE i--::--~---.__ ---·--• --~ • 1 ·-:c,R ' '/ e: .,J . .a... y. 20' : I I • l /oa, ao· • I PARKING SJ>K.es 1 AN~ 2 ,..,... ----------r·• ~ ' . I I LC)\ • E£ X L ~::o 1 \ "'-1 0, BLDy. t.; <:f'. r=:-r, :::::,4 84 _Q_ ,v ~~ R... _:_ .'FR.E.D -~-s-1 l)" r-N'' S b I. j !I-[ I ! ' ' 1.,..../ ...._. l I .._ NC1E: ~-0 ~t ~-l, c"". r~a I Cr··a :1c1es ' Pr~cx: :=::ed \)ci l..3n,.Jsc..dDP or· =r·rr r:-=ia ti O 1'1 1 CrYi::l nc1~s I ,J -! City of C., .,~~-"d Plannin1g Com1nis~'.r.,n Ca.,, Ne>. C..ti.e:.l.'!.1c> .. E,hib!f No ..... A ......... . o., •. :x • ~1-a L._ "'"\"'\"".~~> ~ --~,-,,, . .,..,; _ ___...' ,. REVISIONS BY • ,' : ,·; •• , . :-:; ( ! • j Dato ..JAN. /4, ,':ifi'/ Scale / ".-cc / () I Job Sheet J CUP-196 Carlsbad Montessori School-Classroom Diagram l Coa..+ Area. Clos t-I \ I i ..L,--~· I .s+cr. je \ k i+c hen I I Cla.ssr-oom Ciassroorr. Cfassroon-1 ba..+h ExAiJi+ 8 )/;.'f It/ Carlsbad Schools, Inc. Arrival and Departure Times Estimate for New School Facility Arrival Times: 7:30 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. Staggered arrivals -% per existing school 7:30 -7:45 6 7:45 -8:00 8 8:00 -8:15 7 8:15 -8:30 10 8:30 -8:45 8 8:45 -9:00 7 9:00 -9:15 6 9:15 -9:30 6 9:30 -9:45 4 9:45 -10:00 2 11:15 -11:30 2 11:30 -11:45 2 11:45 -12:00 1 12:00 -12:15 2 12:15 -12:30 2 Departure Times: 11:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. 11:30 -11:45 3 11:45 -12:00 1 12:00 -12:15 2 12:15 -12:30 3 3:00 -3:15 2 3:15 -3:30 3 3:30 -3:45 8 3:45 -4:00 6 4:00 -4:15 6 4:15 -4:30 5 4:30 -4:45 6 4:45 -5:00 4 5:00 -5:15 6 5:15 -5:30 6 5:30 3 Staggered departures -% per existing school c;1i///l C 1/~'J/PI