HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-05-27; Planning Commission; ; SDP 77-01D|CUP 201 - FOTOMAT CORPORATIONDATE:
TO:
FROM:
STAPP REPORT
May 27, 1981
Planning Commission
Planning Department
SUBJECT: SDP 77-1(D). CUP-201 -(POTOMAT CORP.)
Request for an amendment to the approved Site
Development Plan and a Conditional Use Permit for a
drive-thru film processing and sales facility in West
Bluff Plaza in the C-1-Q zone.
I . PROJECT DESCRIPTIOB
The proposed project involves the construction of a 36 square
foot commercial building for the purpose of walk-up and drive-
thru service of film processing and sales. As shown on Exhibit
"A", this project will be located in the West Bluff Plaza
parking lot, near the corner of Dove Lane and El Camino Real.
Presently, the site is occupied by a landscape island which
would be decreased in size to accommodate the drive-thru unit
and an 87-foot long by 10-foot wide stacking lane for customers.
This lane should accommodate a stack-up of two vehicles in
addition to a customer being served at the window. As proposed,
the unit will be one-sided, 12 feet in height, and painted and
trimmed to match the shopping plaza.
I I . All ALY SIS
Planning Issues
1) Is the proposed project compatible with the existing
plaza and parking facilities with respect to visual
impacts and traffic flow concerns?
2) Does the project meet the required findings for a
Conditional Use Permit?
III. DISCUSSIOB
As proposed, the requested project and use should have a minimal
impact upon the existing shopping plaza. As shown on Exhibit
"B", the structure itself will be attractive and in conformance
with the design criteria of the center. The stacking lane on the
east side of the unit should adequately accommodate expected
vehicle traffic for the facility and should not interfere with
traffic circulation. Also, to minimize conflicts, vehicle
service will be one-way only, and no business will be conducted
on the west side of the facility.
The leased offices and stores in the plaza at the present time
with the exception of Rancho Market, are not considered high
traffic generators and the parking lot is only moderately
occupied during peak hours. Vehicular traffic within the plaza
generally travels through the more easterly traffic aisle
directly fronting on the businesses themselves. The lane upon
which Fotomat Corporation requests their facility maintains a
rather low volume of traffic. Staff feels this basic trend will
continue.
Additionally, since the plaza parking area is heavily landscaped,
the reduction in landscape area to accommodate the facility will
not affect the overall appearance of the center.
Staff has found that the requested use is desirable for the
development of the community, is essentially in harmony with the
various elements and objectives of the general plan, and is not
detrimental to the existing uses or to uses permitted in the
zone. Further, the proposed site is adequate in size and shape
to accommodate the use, and the street system serving the use is
adequate to properly handle the expected traffic generated by the
use. In general, the use requested by SOP 77-l(D) and CUP-201
will not conflict with the present and future goals for the area.
Staff believes, therefore, this use can meet the required
findings for a Conditional Use Permit.
IV. EBVIROBMEIITAL RBVIBW
The Planning Director has determined that this project will not
have a significant impact upon the environment and has issued a
Negative Declaration on May 14, 1981.
V. RBCOMMEIIDATIOB
It is recommended that the Planning Commission APPROVE the
Negative Declaration issued by the Planning Director and adopt
Resolution No. 1806, approving SOP 77-l(D) and Resolution No.
1807, approving CUP-201, based on the findings and subject to
the conditions contained therein.
ATTACBIIDTS
1) PC Resolution No. 1806 (SOP 77-1(0))
2) PC Resolution No. 1807 (CUP-201)
3) Background Data Sheet
4) Location Map
5) Disclosure Form
6) Environmental Documents
7) Exhibits "A"-"C"
PJK:ar
5/12/81
-2-
BACKGROUND DATA SHEET
CASE NO: SDP 77-l(D)/CUP-201
APPLICANT: FOTOMAT CORPORATION
REQUEST AND LOCATION: To construct a Fotornat drive-thru, east
side of El Camino Real, between Dove and Alga.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that portion of the West Half of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 12 South, Range 4
West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the County of San Diego, State
of California.
Assessors Parcel Number: 215-052-07
Acres: 4.55 No. of Lots: 1
GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
General Plan Land Use Designation: RM-H
Density Allowed: 10-20 du/ac
Existing Zone: C-1-Q
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:
Zoning
North: C-1-Q
South: C-1-Q
East: C-1-Q
West: C-1-Q
PUBLIC FACILITIES
School District: San Marcos
Water District: Costa Real
Sewer District: Leucadia County
Denisty
Proposed:
N/A
Proposed Zone:
N/A
Land Use
Commercial Center
Commercial Center
Commercial Center
Commercial Center
EDU' s: None
Required--
Public Facilities Fee Agreement, dated: March 19, 1981
(Other:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Negative Declaration, issued: May 13, 1981
LOCATION
•. ~ \ ij
{'
J ,,,
t.
0
~
\ r
CASE NO. SOP 77-I {o)
APPLICANT :FO:tr2 MA-.T
MAP
SIJ•
Sul
Y\S:e't:hTX Ne,,5!
..1fter the informatilil!!t'OU nave s1.u;,11u.\..'-~ .u.a_. uccm .A.'\._fwc=u, .1.i:;. .1.s u1:1.c:"-•"-'•rn=~
,hat further infoxmatiW,.J.s required, you will be so ~ed.
APPLICANT:
AGENT:
MEMBERS:
Name (individual,
If C/[, ., I \re~ I c;..J.
Bu'.siness Add.res /
Telephone Number
s:~---.a
Name
Business Address
Telephone Number
Name ·(individual, partner, joint
venture, corporation, syndication)
Business Address
Telephone Number
Name
3usiness Address
Telephone Number
nt~e, corporation, s
11/2, 1c: w:, J. hs. 2: c G j-o I )
Home Address
Telephone Number
Home Address
Telephone Number
(Atta.ch more sheets if necessary)
I/We declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this dis-
closure is true and correct and that it will remain true and correct and may be
relied upon as being true and correct until amended.
BY ;;
1U£L¢= , __ .._A_g_oo....,~t:;_,-0;""".-:,::;;n_e-.1.r"'"-,;;=::p;;.Ja""r-t:.n::;;e;:=,r_..L-______ _
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
Citp of €:arl~bab
NIDATIVE DECLARATION
TELEPHONE:
(714) 438-5821
PROJECT ADDRESS/LOCATION: West Blu:ff Plaza parking lot at Dove Lane
and El Camino Real.
~T DESCRIPTION: The Construction of a 36 square foot commercial _
building for the purpose of drive-thru service of film processing and
sales.
The City of Carlsbad has conducted an environmental review of the
above described project pursuant to the Guidelines for Implementation
of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental
Protection Ordinance of the City of Carlsbad. As a result of said
review, a Negative Declaration (declaration that the project will not
have a significant impact on the environment) is her~by issued for the
subject project. Justification for this action is on file in the
Planning Depart;nent.
A copy of the Negative Declaration with supportive documents is on
file in the Planning Department, City Hall, 1200 Elm Avenue, Carlsbad,
CA. 92008. Comments from the public are invited. Please submit
comments in writing to the Planning Depart en within ten })'°f ~ay=s""'-o
date of publication. L'
DATED: Mey 14, 1981 ~~~c,a~
CASE NO: SDP-77-1(D)/CUP-201
APPLICANT: FUTOMAT
POBLISH DATE: Mey 16, 1981
ND-4 5/81
JAMES C. HAG
Planning Director
DEVELOPMENTAL
SERVICES
O Assistant City Manager
(714)43NMI
0 Bulldlng Department •
(714)43M625
□ EngfnMrlng Department
(714) 43N541
o Housing & Reclevelopment Department
(714> 43&6111
a Planning Depa,tment
(714)'3Nlf91
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
Citp of <Carlic&a'b
PUBLIC NOTICE OF PREPARATION
1200 ELM AVENUE
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008
The Planning Department of the City of Carlsbad intends to
prepare a Negative Declaration for the following project:
Project Description: The proposed project involves the
construction of a 36 square foot commercial building for the
purpose of drive-thru service of film processing and sales.
Project address/Location: West Bluff Plaza parking lot at
El Camino Real and Dove Lane.
Anticipated significant impacts: ~mNE
We need to know your ideas about the effects this project might
have on the environment and your s~ggestions for ways the project
could be revised to reduce or avoi1 any significant environmental
damage. Your ideas will help us decide what issues to analyze in
the environmental review of this project.
Your comments on the environmental impact of the proposed project
may be submitted in writing to the Planning Department, 00 Elm
Avenue, Carlsbad, CA 92008, no later than May ;)--v
DATED: April 24, 1981 l__'
CASE NO: SDP 77-1(D)/CUP-201
APPLICANT: FOTOMAT CORP
PUBLISH DATE: April. 29, 1981
JAMES C.
Planning
..
• ·ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FORM -Part I
(To ~e • Comple:ted by APPLICA.W)
CASE NO:_· -------
DATE: • 9'-2. 3-i' I·
Applicant: -p,;L...,., j. • @;o vp (@et<i~i:.w ,£,:e ... +)
Address of Applicant: t('ifl ,pwvl sf., ~--w:C,,ll\ @J. I.{. 9ckS::<1
Phone Ntnnber: UH) • ~l,3 ~~ S::~ ..
N~e, address and phone number of person to be contacted (if other.than Applicant):
'1-d
Cl J G~e':1 /1~£3 5/Jrou I c, t .dor»HJ ~ C'J,l :( yot,So-· • y, ~ lr-Sj I ' ., -
• ·GENERAL INFORMATION:
Description of Project: e_/ .... ::Zc:ef"~•J ~ <;~Jes
Project Location/Address:· ----------------------
Assessor Parcel Number:
Zone of Subject Property: ---~ ....... 0-""""'_ ... _ ..... ___ e_._1r-__ c __ ,_.1,_I ____________ _
Proposed Use of Site: _ ____.(! ______ o_i:n....._..-. ___ 1_f __ t::<_i_~ __ / __ "2 ____ f_~ __ : .... ib_ ... {!{_; ..... ('!-l __ ;,J __ h_<_,_r_~_,_,_/ ___ . tr .
4: 5.:.,6ll~'"5 .. -
List all other applicable applications related to this project: ffens. . . .
..
..
.. , .
'•
ND 1
'EIR 1
2.
...
. 4 ••
.;
5.
...
'
. )
.
Describe the.2.ctlvity area, inciuding distinguishing
natural and-mamr.ade charactaristics; also provide precise
slope analysis-when appropriate.
•• ( Vv-\V<-~-..:-J .L_~'-"~ ·+ 13"kl1 ('"t*e,_
D.escribe energy conservation measures' incorporated· into
the design·and/or operation of the project. (For a more
specific discussion·of·energy conservation requirements
see of the City's EIR Guidelines).
J 6 r, I ~\lj -h,~ >oM~ G."1' (011,e._ re~~: .. e l,,J)~•~
o~,-~'"',l .... i ~ cl • _
If residential, include the number of units,· schedule of
unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of
household size expected.
-
If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood,
city 0r regionally oriented_, square-footage of sales area,
i.,,.1d loading facilities. /e. ,r, \»~'-..~,i' ol.-~e."~ ~d • ;J, 1,•: • 'a \4! • ~C.:::-~ v ,'r-e l.tJ'a~J, c..u· _
If industriai, indicate type, ·estimated employrn~nt per
shift, and ~oad~~g ~acilities .
• ---• . . .
It institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employreent per-shift, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community beneflts to Qe derived from the
project .. • • { • .
·I_ e. "-f \o'(e _e..-• 13.,_e(:'4· -\-Q ~-~~ ~~.,-~ '±,.
-~ ~c:.... 7_~l_f' F_ -t-J..,c.. --tr-E:-~I l-y-e""'~-.,..(. ID ..,~s ~
~v-:"'.e.r, ... -.. ~ . \..o. -~-.)-\~·--e.,..s ·. l.u-,~ ~Je.\ . s-~"; ... rs .
• • ~ ""''L '-' ,.;.."" ~ ~ '/. -h i~~i._
I .. ENVIRONMENTAL "IMPACT ANALYSIS
Answer the following qc.estions by placing a check in the
·appropriate space. (Discuss all. items ·checked yes. Attach
additional sheets· as nece~sary) ..
YES NO . -.
. .
. .
1·) Could the project significantly change present
·1and uses i:i the vicinity of th_e·. activity?
2) Could the activity affect the use of a rec-
reational area, or area of important
~esthetic value?
·-3) Could the activity affect t~e functioning of
an.established community or neighborhood?
4) Could ·the activity result in the displacement
• of community residents?
5} • Could the activity increase the.number of low
-and modera~e cost housing units in the city?
6} Could the activity decrease the ·number of low
and modest cost housing units in the city?
.7} 1i-..re a:1y of the natural or man-made features
in the activity area uniqu~, that ~s, not·
found in other parts of the County, State,:
or Nation? •
8) Could the activity significantly affect -a
historical or archaeological site or its
settings?
9) Could the activity significantly affect the
potential use, extraction, or conservation
·.of a scarce -natural resource?
• lO)· Does the activity area serve as a habitat,
food ~ource nesting place, source'of water,
etc. for rare or endangered wildlife on fish
··species?
11) Could the activity significantly affect fish,
wildli£e or plant life?
·12}
13)
. .
~re-t~ere any· rare or endangered plant·
·species in th~ activity area~ • . . . .
Could the activity change existing features
of any of the ci -ty' s lagoons, _b.:iy_s, or • •
tidelands? •
X.
•
X
X
. . .
.
•
•
..
•
141
) Could the e.ctiv·ity change existing features of
any of the city's beaches?
15) -Could· the activity result in the erosion or
el~mination of agricultural lands?
16)· Could the activity serve to encourage qevelop-
ment of presently undeveloped areas or intesify
development of already developed areas?
171 Will the activity require a variance from
established enviro1ui\ental standards (air, _water,
noise, et:c)?
1_8) -: Will the activity requir~ certification,
authorization or issuance cf a permit by any
• .local, state or federal environmental· control
agenc~?
' .,
19.) Will the activity require issuance of a v
variance or conditional use permit by the city? • ~
20)
21)
22)
23)
24r .
25)
26)
27}
28)
Will the activity involve the application, use,
_or disposal of potentially hazardous ~terials?
. Will the activity involve construction of
tacilities in a flood plain? •
Will the activity involve GOnstruction of
facilities on a slope of 25 percent or greater.?
. .
Will the activity involve construction of·.·
facilities in the area of an active fault?
Could the activity result 'in the generation
of s~gnificant amounts of noise? .
Co~ld the activity result in the generation
of significant amounc~ of dust? • •
Will the activity involve the bu:,:-nin~ of brush,
trees, or other materials?
Could.the activity result in a significant
change in the quality of any portion of the
.region's· air or water resources? (Should not~,
s~rface, ground water, off-shore). . . .
Will the prpjcct substantinlly incrcnse fuel
consumption (clcctr.i.city, oil, nat:,ural gas,
etc.)? • . •
29) Wi.11 there be a. significant c~angc to existing
• land form?
. . --·
X
-X-
X
X
X
·v··_ -~
•
·.
•. , .. -
.
(a) indicate ·estimated grading to be done in
cu~ic yards _______ _
-(b) perce"ntage of ·alteration to_ the .. present
· land form . ---------
(c) maximum height of cut or fill slopes
.
3P) Will the activity result in.substantial increases
in _the use of utili tics, sewers.,·. drains, or
str.eets?
31) Is the activity carried out as part of a iarger·
• project or series of projects?
•
•
• .
·• . .
.
•·5-
. . .
I•.
I
·X·
t
II, STATFMENT OF NON:,;SIGNIFICANf ENVIR~IENTAL EFFECTS
·1£ you have answered yes to· one or more of the questions
in Section I but you think the ~ttivity will have no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons
below:
. 1, \lr ·s o ,,_\y 3b n/ a/ lo; ,r .,.,,\.-
~~ '7 ~., \-. w ~ l\
\;~~
e:-,',[JJ 'fJ"~~
r-p'"'f l ,· ~
foe. J. 7 ?~v\,,}#"' b
@O"'-"~.,,._~h-r( +=c,·•
....
_III~ CO,MENTS OR "ELABORATIONS TO ANY OF TI-IE QUESTIONS. IN SECTION I
.
·(If additional space is needed for answering ·any questions
attach additional sheets as may be needed). .
Signature • •
• • Date ~igned ·_· _· _· • ....... t/_-_. _~_._:3_:-_· __ f ...... /_-_______ __
Jl~\TJRO;•J.1f:.\J'fAL DlPACT ASSESSMENT FOm,I Part II
(To Ile Comp] C"tcd Hy TI1e
PLANNING DEPAR1?-lliNf)
·r.ASE NO. 5l>/? 77-1ft,) cuP-P)J
. DAIB: • r/z,,j-8,____I __ _
• I. BACKGROUND
1. APPLI00..1: rmmA-r UJ(?P.
2. /u)DRESS A,'il PHONE NU~IBER o:r APPLICAiYI': -------------
3. DATE Q-IECKLIST SUBMITTED:_· --~+/ __ -2, __ ~~1._.I_I ..... -_--_____ -_· _· ·_· _· _· •_· _· ·_·_· _
II. • "ENVJR0;0.1Ei'!TAL J:-:PACTS
tEXPLA.\i\'l'lO";S OF ALL AFFiffi.li\TIVE A'JSh'ERS ARE TO BE l\'lUTIEN UNDER
Section III -DISCUSS~_DN OF &VIROX\lE'ITAL EVALUiffIO>J)
1. • l\:n.-th lf ill the proposal have signi-
ficaI1t results in: •
a. lJnstablc earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
• b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or ovcrcovering of the soil?
. c. • Change in topography or ground
surface relic£ features?
d. TI1e dcstrnctjon, covering or
: moclification of any unique ncologic
or· physical f"eaturcs?
e. Any incrc~se in wind or w.itcr
erosion of so.i ls, ci tbcr on or off
the site?
f. C11:mr.cs in clc•position or ero-
sion of hl'ach s:m<ls, or ch:1nJ~cs
in silt:1tion, i:c:•positi.on or erosion
which may modify the ch:mncl of a
rh•cr or strt.":i;a or the hctl of the
~ccan or :my h.:1y I i;ilct or l.akt.~?
--
. .
... -~
..
..
2. Air: Will the proposal have sir;ni··/-, C/i 117-
resul ts in: •
a. Air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
b. "111e creation of obj cc_tionable
odors?
c. Alteration of air movcw.cnt,
mosit.ure or temperature, or any
• change in clruntc, either lqcally .
. or regionally?
3. Water: Will the proposal have sigi-
Iicant results in:
·a._ Changes in currents, or the
course or direction of water move-
ments, in ci ther marine or fresh
' • waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
• drainage pattcn1s, or the rate and
• amount of surface water n.Jrioff?
c. Alter;,_tions to the course or
fl0w 0£ flood waters?
d .. • Chru1ge in the amount of sur-
face wa tcr in any ,\·a ter body?
e, Discharge into surface waters,
or in c1ny alteration of surface
.~iatcr quGlity, including but not
limited to tcmper~iture, dissolved
o:>..-ygcn or turbidity?
L Alteration of the d:ircction
or ·rate of flow of .groun~l waters?
g. Change in the quantjty of
•• ground waters, either through
• clircct nddi tions or wi thclrawal s,
or through intcrccpbon of nn
aquir,~r by c;:uts or excavations?
h. J?cductjon jn the amount of
water othcn..,j sc ::ivail ;iblc for
11ublic \~.ltcr suppUcs?
Yes Maybe No
i
·-··x
•
I I•• I
;
..
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal have signi-
TI.cant results in:
a. 01ange in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
aquatic plants)?
b .. Reduction of the numbers of
any uiliquc, rare or endangered
• species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species
•of plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the nonnal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
~gricultural crop?
5. • ·Animal Life. Will the proposal have signi-
ficant results in:
a, Changes in the d~versity·of
species, or numocrs of any species
of-animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shell-
fish, bcnthic organisms, insects or
micro fauna)?
b. Reduction of the m.nnbers ·of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
· • c. Introduction of new species
of ani1na ls in to an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or
movement of anfomls?
d. Detcriornt:i.on to existing
fish or wil<llifc habitat?
6.. • "Noise. Will the proposal sir,ni-
ucantly increase existing noise
levels?
7. • -~ht: nnd Glnre. Will the pro-
posal sjg11i.f1Gi"ntly produce new
Hght or r,larc?
•
..
B. Lnnd Use. ·Will the proposal have
si1:niTii::mt result!; in the .iltcrat:ion
of tlm pre~;en t" or pl mmcd lrn1tl use of
nn area'(
• ·yes ·Maybe No
..
)(
.· .. ·X.
•. • -~
X
)(
•.
__ .,..
9. Natm·al P.csom·ccs. Will the pro-
po_sallii"1ve signi.ricant results in:
a. Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
b. Depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
10. Risk of Upset~ Docs the proposal
"involve a significant risk of an
e>.-plosion or the release of haz-
ardous substances (including, but
·not limited to, oil, pesticides,
• • chemicals or radiation) in the
event of an accident or upset
conditions?
°11. •. P?puJ.ation. Will the proposal
• • s1gnii:ic,:mtly alter the locatiori;
' . distribution, dcnsi ty, or grm,th
rate of the human population of
ari area?
12. Housing. Will the proposal signi-
licantfy affect existing housing,
or create a dCr.1:1nd for additional
housing?
13. • ·Transportation/Circulation. Will
the proposal have significant re-·
sults in:
a. Generation of additional
vehicular movement?
b~ Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand ;for new
pai-king?
c, Impact upon c~isti_ng tr::ins-
110rtation systems?
d, Al tcrations to present
patterns of circulation or move--
,ncnt of people nnd/or J!OOds?
c, Alterations to waterborne,
rail or air. tr a.Cf ic? · • •
f., Incrc::isc h1 trnffic ll:11.nrds
to 1IIotor vehicle~, bicyclists or
p<?ucstd mis? . .
Yes Maybe No
. ·---
' .....
i
···X
···••• ---~
····X
... ·)(.
... ·.x
... ·)(
..
..
• 14. Public Services. Will the pro-
posal have a significant effect
upon, or have significant results
in the need for new or altered
governmental services in any of
the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
.•• facilities? .•
e~ Maintenance of public facili-
ties, including roads?
f. Other governmental services? --
15.' faiergy. Will the ·proposal have
signfficant results in:
a .. Use of substantial amounts of
f11el or energy?
b. Demand upon existing sources
of energy, or.require the devdop-
ment o"f new sources of energy?
,,..,.,,. . 16. • ·utilities. Will the proposal have·
significant results 111 the need for
n·ew systems, or al tcrations to the
following utilities:
a. Power_ or natural_ gas7
b, Communications systc-.ms?
.
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e, Stonn water drainage?
£, Solid w:1stc and disposal 7
17, • ·llum:m llc-:1lth. Will the-propo~al
have -:si1:11igTc;1nt rcsul ts in the
err.at.ion of any hl'al th h:1zard or
potcntfol hc-;1l1h ha~anl (~.xclmUng
J1\cntnl. hen 1th) 1
,.!)
. .
. · Yes
. . .
••• 1
......
......
...
-~1aybe No
. .....
......
.. ·x ---
... ·x
... >l.
... x
. .. ')(
... ")(
···x. .
..
18.
19.
20.
21.
., .
Yes ·Maybe No
Acsthct:ics. Will the proposal have
s1gnifj Glllt rcsu] ts in the obstruc-
tion of any scenic vist~ or view
open to the public, or will the pro-_.
posal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open
to public view?
Recrcotion. Will-the proposal have
s1.gn1n cant rcsul ts in the impact
upon the quality or quantity of
• exisUng rc~.rcationnl opportunities? .
Archcologica1/llistorical. Will the ~-proposal have significant results
in the alteration of a significant
• archcological or historical site,
• structure, object or building? .
. .
ANALYZf VJABLE ALTFRX.\TIVES TO 1llE PROPOSED PROJFCT SUCH AS:
a) PHASED DEV}:J.0{-1.:-•iL\T OF 'l1iE·PROJECT; b) t-\L'!lJ~\lA'It SITE
DESIGNS; c) ALITR'\/\TE SCALE OF DEVELOP~rr:,:T: d) 1\LTER.\~\TE
USES FOR nm SIIT; e) DEVELOi1~1E.'ff AT .SO>~ ftrTIJRF. TIME RATixR
TII/\.\J NOW; f) ALTER~\TE SITES FOR 1l1E PROPOSED USE; g) · NO
PROJECT ALTf:!U~ATIVE.
. . .
"JI O ltf./( F MV!,t v~.
·'
..
-'
X
..
. .
22. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIG~'JTFiu\."!CE.
a) DOES 11 IE PROJECT HAVE THE POH1~-
TIAL TO DEGRADE TI IE QUALITY OF
i1IE ENVIROX.\lENT, OR CURTAIL TIIE
DIVERSIIT IN llIE ThVIROi\illENT?
b) DOES TI·IE PROJECT I-Ii\~ TI-IE POIT..~-
TIAI .. TO ACIHEVE SilORT-1Llt'I, 10
nm DISADV1\i\TJ\GE OF LOXG-TE11\I,
ENVIROJ\NENT1'J.. GOALS? (A SHORT-
TERM U.IPACT m~ 1lIE ENVIROiV'llS\i'T
IS 0}.1E \\1IICH OCCURS IN A RE-
. LATIVELY BRIEF, DEFINITIVE
PERIOD OF TIME \\HILE LO}~G-TEHM
IMPACTS WILL ENDURE WELL INID
11-IE l-1J1lJRE-. ) ·
c) . DOES TI-IE PROJECT HA..VE IMPACTS .
\\1-IICH NIB H-mIVIDUALLY LIMITED,
·, BUT ClDfLJL/\TIV~LY CO~\SIDERABLE?
(A }JROJECT J\i\Y IMPACT o:-J 11m
·OR NORE SEPARATE RESOURCES
WHERE 'HIE IMPACT ff-J Ei\OI RE-
SOURCE IS PLLATNELY S.·-1\LL,
BUT l\1 IERE THE EFFECT OF TI-IE
TOTAL OF THOSE Jl\1PACTS ON THE
ENVIRO~\.'<lENT IS SIGXIFIG1Hf.)
d)_ DOES ·nm PROJECT HAVE ENVIRON-.
MENTAL EFFECTS l\JUCH WILL
. CAUSE SUBSTA1VfIAL ADVERSE ·
EfFECrs ON I IID~\N BEH.:Gs,
EI'lllER DIRECTLY OR INDil~CTLY?
III.· DISCUSSION OF HJVIRO~fENTAL EVALUTION
··Yes
. . . .
Maybe No
X
X
_. .. X --
X
,+{G f(U)Pb5f:D P{k)-:iecr }NilOL:Ve~ ~ '6tllt.-Dt/\l,,;._ OY ·A •
' -~'1 ~QfllrLt ~~tr( 130l~pj,jlf". fl~ . l!E'-r1r11.; P"fl.tPbS:t;S /1\J
,.
A-l,.AND4Slh?€ .JtuA t6Cf!(~ I~ ~ . liJE"s-r 131-vF,:
~ P1rrLr.1tJG-. Lt>-r -AJ°tlrK-~ -t•flltJ~YJ. or -~v~. L~
A-I) 'f 1-CArviw~: .fW.tt.. ~ ~«;, ~,1.,1, ,-612. w •
~~ Or Fu .. M ,s ·o~,,pj~o •. ,=-va., .• VEl-hc~ O/Z.1Ve'-7,f,ev
AN.u 1th/$ Wt~ t.€qvl~ 11-tf,' l>SO~e. ar ~ ,tMIP(J1c;vKL
..
--.
DISQJSSJON OF ENVIRO~irr:NTAT, E\'J\LlJ.\TTON (Continued)
. .
· tJ'/lf, \lSE f6etw.t,. : As,i;,e: • faoM .. M1Nat'l. ~ff,<-
·, MPA<.-"fS. Ci¥t"tlf1,J 1l-tE •• 11iAff,L . y.UJvJ · tr ~ f'Atl.ltlNV
1,crr, • WH'lll-1 ~Ul-0. &E" ~W•iV\Ar I tJ~ ~WE._ evv•~-
~flVTJtt.. ~~ ~ ~ c~D • ,r,_ A a"..wvr
tJt: 1'bs PtJ)d'~~-t . -.
• . -
-· .
'
..
• .
. .
·-
.. •.
..
-IV. DE11~RMJNATION. (TO BE COMPLETED BY 11IE PLANNING DEPAR1NG\'T)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
"I-. ·J find the proposed project COULD NOT have· a significnnt
• effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECL!\RATiml ,rill
be prepared. •
_-I find· that although the proposed project coul;d have a
signific~nt effect on the environment, there will not be
a significant effect· in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A conditional negative declaration will
wi~l be prepared.
~-J·find the proposed project Ht\Y have a significant effect
• on the environment, and an E\'VIROi\1-IENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required.
V. MITIGATU,G MEi\SURES (IF APPLICABLE)
.•
"
. . .
. .
. gnature
. .
-\ . .
•
..
~
HITIC'iATING MEASURES (C.ontinued)
,;
...
YI .•.APPLIC.l\;'\T "CO~am~1E\CE ·wrTI-I MITIGATING MEASURES
. . .
.,
THIS IS ·ro CERTIFY 'TTY\T I H/\VE REVIE\1ED TIIE ABOVE :MITIGATIONG MEA-
SURES AND COXCU:R l\11H THE ADDITION OF 'Jffi.SE :MEASURES TO 1HE PROJ::CT.
Date:· ------------Signature of Applicant
. . . "
• ..
(') '<l' If)
re:, Om 0-t )> )>
-I -_r
0 z
JJ m <
m -0
2
Ill
(/)
I -m
SHEET DESCRIPTION
. I ~ ~
L ; ::i:
• 1---
I
THIS DRAWING CONTAINS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION BELONGING TO FOTOMAT
CORPORATION: ANY USE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF FOTOMAT
CORPORATION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. 0FOTOMAT CORPORATION. 1968, 1971, 1972,
1974. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN U.S.A.
PROJECT FOR:
,.,
11
' I ~ \
I \ \ ' \ \ \ \
I \
\ \
\ \ I
l I I I
\ \ \
\ \
6ITE PLA~J
FOTO AT.
m -I
. (')
,O -~ 1200 HIGH RIDGE ROAD
~I~~~-+!.
,✓~~r bL-urf {)t,,,A~
\,<'A 6a01 ..4, G,,•..:\--,
6 • ~ STAMF-0R·G1···-G=r.......--e-6-985
~
i l \ ,:~ _.-:.--
City ~• ~
Plannin . ., ' •• ,,,,
r: •"" .J .... ,.~ , , 1 .. 2.-~:;_.,
~' '""
---, . .,.., .....
Case No::,:,}--··--·-··~····-·•
Exli;bit No ..... ::: .............. .
Date
ARCHITECT:
MORGAN C. BRAINERC
!1200 MICH RICGE ROAD
S'l"A-MF-ORf-FD-, -c"l-'T'.•.----"'BHB=t-eSHB"'""'s=-
2 mo:3> ::1ae-aaa1 ~ L.---------..L:D~A:.:,T.:E:....:!.:.,I L:~:l.L;;@::;;·CJ· i.:;D;,:.R:A:.:W;.;N~r?t:::' ~-J~·...J1.:S~C~A:,:L;::E:..l:..".:.::.::5d~-.L:==================================:;::===============:::;;;::;:;:;::;;;;::;;::!..L __ _::::==---_JL _________________ 1~· _J.J_j
\\ ,_, ;,[NEW ADDRESS> 1!14 DANBURY ROAD WILTON, CT. DBB97 U!03J 7B2--B-B2-1 .,
\,
ro Om 0-l
)> ► -1-_ r
0 z
lJ m s rn -0
2 rn
ro m'.!l ::j ► m-:n r
R~-1~;:;,V££ .,.,_ ~'2,?l-~,.;,~-'77-
€ )< 1 s / 1 . .-.....-~ t-/ .£?,;,,:r /.;,7t:,,t!'
-------------------------------
__K 10:'Sk DE IA IL
1/8"=. l'-011
SHEET DESCRIPTION
\
\
THIS DRAWING CONTAINS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION BELONGING TO FOtOMAT
CORPORATION: ANY USE WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF FOTOMAT
CORPORATION IS EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. 0F'OTOMAT CORPORATION. 1968. 1971. 1972.
1974. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINTED IN U.S.A.
PROJECT a?-4<.6 FOR:
kl06K DE1AIL FOTO!t¾1 'VALk'--UP
~ S"\t\O ='-. ~ ,4~[7 O~E--61DED DRIVE
--R£1.L:>C-A1£1? Ll6k'T
--.J.!-,P.OU:
F;;;;,r._...,,/.,,._,:,. r '"~at.,"'.-up
A'---''.-0 .c>A/C -~/PL:?
P.Rl\/c -,.Hk"V UNI,?';
\ \
/=XIS I /,VG;, \ PARK'/-./~
\
FOTO
J
E::,,u s T1Af6'-J CURO /·'-'•""7
r~ .e~~-;.• 6-11-.1
AT. ~ D \':?,, '" 6 Tl-l RU V.! 06k' '~ \VE$1 f:3,LUfF PLAZA 1200 HIGH RIDGE ROAD
06905
A~CHITECT:
MORGAN C. BRAINER□
1200 HIGH RIDGE ROAD
STAMFORD, CT. 06905 l ~ L-A u?0A1 cAl--!F. STAMFORD, CT.
z i.._ _______ ---1LD_A_T_E_12_-.;..1""J_-.;;so;,;;;,..,J.D;;;,.;R.,;;,A.;.;W.;.;N.:..:.;P....;e~--JL.:S::C.:.:A;,:LE:.;.,V;~s...:"-:::c:,,;l~'-o::.J~ ~====================;=====[=2=0=3=)==3=2=9=-=·=e=B=3=1==========:U-..:::::::::::::. __ l ________________ J
...._
. ·i
·,:.~J»··'
• •.. I ..
,.·
. . '.
'
i"'li::cT ·.:.Cr41 H 5 SE'::re-,,CK'?
bUILDil'iG OPP!.C.!AL
f
' I
' •
NOTE.:
sc,:.._.LE
I
·"-·1'0" ' -"" '
L .. -.
nJ
PAIW1 ALL /J\'JU.10'1$ Af..lD
Tf-<'1//1 T,,:;::-, //\A'Tc,k Co Lo-~ ~
;,µoP,"7!•.' ;S C::EIJT~ 2
n:Ji'.111:·~~-:p -s·ru4~,.;, -t??
,i\,\Tc::c -c,·.:,, ,·,,· ·._,, C::E•~TF.!l'
A 0 I
l
_,/"""~~__:.,-;.:_ __ ' • '
~--~-. . .
SDP
\! ,
CHy of Ca,kbad
Planning Coffl_~ission
'--.---~
ffl tp01 Af e br
c... No.fSf.f-,1. ·.. . .
Exh:bit No. /(3;,_-"c:··-.~0
Dote 3.=2!:(:.:6.L_
' J
1 ~.
r ....
.. . ' ~ . . ' . ,.:...."-~~1•<•' •-:\•·' ,_,. •• "'"·"'"""-' ,.,,,~ .,_.,.,..,..,. -~•.·•".'"""~"-"'"""''""'""'f'"I""""""'.,... '·"."'":"'"""'' ~-.'
1 •
• ' 1
i ' l
I
,
'
' • '
I
/
\i
-.... , ---·-·
""?;
I /
I
·n:J l
:n=:cT ~REV" 3'~_'.,'.7
; "fD u\/.ifC~ 5:.1L:Pfl\lb t ?t:. \.1. I !~. ;s,U ,:t.(;) -i<;•
l SE L..A 1--IABl?A x-50 .,.,,_,,c',,-•.t \_VU 1·1·•-t...<iw:-1 .;,. r"-,· 'c:;.
.i,.
a
i .i
'
.
' l
\
-,:.. _ _._.,,
: ,, f ' / -'
j
i
l l
j
I
. •,-, I .,< \ 'l'-V
\ I
. .,
C
PA\Uf b.LL 1//i\JL\...IGU;
7'V-\lv'1 72) ~fc.\-l CD\..(fi2.
I ,
I
! c:::.. I_,
'h•/ -·" :. -~:"' ,_,;,,.~ ,,,;.,,.....,._....,..~,...,. J~ ..,,, .. .,.., ~-_,, • .;. -?=~.~ .. __:_ .. ,..,....,,.."""..:..,.,,:...,._~----~-... ,,,,,.~-~--~-,--,~-. --·-·-··--.-. ,,,,.,,,.,.,..,..,, _ _,.,,,,_hH--•~·--... .,--~.,-.... -_.,,.,,,,.." ......... "'.~-~"'-'"' ..... ""'·-"''""''---;""""'-~--,~-~~-•S---,.,..,. .......... ,,._.,,,-----.....--•M-"-"'·"'·•...-.,..,-.. ---', , .-,~ ' ' \. •• , ~ :·,:. . ' . f ·l • . • < ••. ••• • (
~,-. ~
\ J-/_c
!
I
f
,• ,••' : . . : .. -,.,,
.. u
~• ,\, -, ;:'.'" c'.~;, -' ,,., \., ,,'
/,::.,, ~-
:.,.;
• ---__ ..J_; 11
i!.-' <·--~~-~-~ ---~-::.:...-· .•.··~----·---· ...::.....,._ ·-~~:~ -, __ •
' I.. . I .,
I
\
. ) '.,.-. j
i•-_,. ••
i
I ...... l<t'.' ,-
-~~---\-·,-' •
\
.::: ; t ,,;-~--' . c .. ~ ,.··;~,-
.., •J -
_r-, . .-, ~ it.'.; '.7
'-~·,,.JI -,;•-•~
--;--·· j-----·-·-·-----·---t-
Ncr,E:"
.prz.o'i 10t::; 1/e," 0,uc,;,o i,;xreR-co CL
f1N 10H ove.r... v1Ai...V-'-:-✓11?..e iv\EI-"'?\-1,
t;e,cc.,urz-&. r,J ,He. Aw1-~-l'?\..O~ .0K,11-J
"~}/,:,Sh·'(,. )·1~~(Ai...-~l'Z...G:..\• . ./S (c:?:\1€: f'-'6'12-
/ . ;t \ F:.'ti..e,.H ll·i2. 1,~--.P~ -";01~~/.1.V& ,AiZ..l:;-,A.)
P1?-vv1 oe ?<?<"~N e·a. f-'ie?L..O:':> A-r AU ..
•. opGN 11-i.t:i "?, •
I
(
f>' '· -, ·,_
_...;·~ .... :(
,; I , .•:!' •• : l .,,,,,,,,,--,;:,( . / .
'. ·,,,•;
J ,, ,-" ~-, I
{-;:·-_,., ..
, _ _.. ,;-
'.' -~«t
(
I
i
' • ---,' ' ...
, /"\ 1' i City of C.rlsb.,d I , ·•,'
• • :·~--'✓• Planning Com-mission ····----------·-~----. .
Fe tom 0:+: toll 0 r
c;.,. . No.SlJ/2?-~
Exhibit. No .... L-:. .. ..,.,
Date .~:=:.ib.~:-~L •
' ·'
I I I :· i
l I ,.
!
,(. ---'-·
c"~\n -",~•