HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-05-07; Traffic Safety Commission; ; Establish a prima facie speed limit upon Palmer Way from Faraday Avenue to Cougar DriveCITY OF CARLSBAD
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
COMMISSION MEETING OF: May 7, 2007
LOCATION: Palmer Way, Faraday Avenue to Cougar Drive
INITIATED BY: Deputy City Engineer, Transportation Division
ITEMNO.6C
REQUESTED ACTION: Establish a prima facie speed limit upon Palmer Way from
Faraday A venue to Cougar Drive
BACKGROUND:
No prima facie speed has been established on Palmer Way. The road has existed more
than twenty years and was constructed as part of the Palomar Woods Business Park.
SETTING SPEED LIMITS:
Optimal mobility is enhanced and overall traffic flow improved when drivers are
operating their vehicles at a speed that is reasonable and safe. In fact, the premise of CVC
section 22350, Basic Speed Law, is that no person shall drive upon a road at a speed
greater than is reasonable and prudent taking into account weather, visibility, and traffic
on the road and in no event at a speed that endangers the safety of others. Most drivers
operate vehicles in a reasonable manner. Traffic laws established on the basis of the
behavior of the reasonable and prudent motorist are found to be the most successful.
Roads in Carlsbad are designed in accordance with engineering standards to satisfy the
goals of a safe roadway and to enhance efficient traffic flow. One way to achieve the
goals is to establish proper and reasonable speed limits that can be enforced. Speed limits
that are reasonable can help to achieve voluntary compliance by the majority of drivers
without need for the presence of a police officer. Laws and/or the establishment of speed
zones that arbitrarily restrict travel by the majority of motorists can lead to wholesale
violations of the posted speed limit.
In the City of Carlsbad, the predominant practice for managing speed is by legally
establishing a prima facie speed limit and then posting the speed limit upon the road with
regulatory signs. A prima facie speed limit recognizes that conditions change throughout
the day and there is no one safe speed for all the conditions that may be present upon the
roadway. Police enforcement is used to target the most egregious violators of the speed
limit. A fundamental tenet is that laws are enacted to protect the majority of the public by
regulating the unsafe or unreasonable actions of the few.
( (
CITY OF CARLSBAD
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
COMMISSION MEETING OF: May 7, 2007
( continued)
ITEMNO. 6C
Nationally recognized vetted practices and guidance per standards and procedures in the
Federal Highway Administration's national Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
2003 Edition are considered when setting speed limits. In California, this manual is titled
the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The most common method of
establishing speed limits incorporates traffic engineering principles and other factors,
such as using the results of a speed survey, into the Traffic and Engineering Survey.
Prima facie speed limits are established by law when the City Council adopts an
ordinance and the speed limit is posted on the roadway to indicate the maximum
reasonable speed for a driver to operate a vehicle under ideal conditions in off-peak free
flowing conditions. Among many factors, the three most persuasive arguments to
consider when setting a realistic, or rational, speed limit are:
1. Critical speed (85th percentile speed)
2. Collision history
3. Conditions that may not be readily apparent to the driver
The premise implied in s&eed zoning is that the majority of drivers are operating their
vehicles at or near the 85 percentile speed. Drivers that operate their vehicle at speeds
higher than the 85th percentile speed should be the focus of the police. An important
speed zoning concept is that the disparity in speed between vehicles on the road is
reduced when prima facie speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed
and, as a result, safety is enhanced. Also, a speed limit that is established based upon the
85th percentile speed will increase driver respect for the speed limit sign. Only those signs
that have the respect of the roadway user will have a positive effect to control traffic.
A review of the collision history on a roadway is an important element in the process to
establish a speed limit. The review will reveal if there is a high incidence of speed-related
collisions on the road at specific locations. Absent a significant collision history
attributed to speed, it can be concluded that drivers are operating their vehicle in a
reasonable and prudent manner at the speed they chose to drive.
The installation of a speed limit sign does not automatically decrease accident rates nor
increase roadway safety. Speed limits should not be lowered for conditions that are
readily apparent and the speed limit signs are not used as intersection, curve or hazard
warning devices. For the unusual conditions or conditions not readily apparent to drivers,
appropriate warning signs are installed.
Design factors such as the geometric elements of the· road, sight distance, or other factors
may have a significant impact on the free flowing speed chosen by drivers. This driver
chosen speed, in tum, is considered when establishing a prima facie speed limit.
( (
CITY OF CARLSBAD
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
COMMISSION MEETING OF: May 7, 2007
(continued)
ITEMNO. 6C
A number of factors may be considered when establishing a prima facie speed limit.
The 2003 MlJTCD lists such factors as:
A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance;
B. The pace speed;
C. Roadside development and activity; and
D. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period.
As stated, basic speed law requires drivers to operate their vehicle at a speed that takes
into account all roadway factors, environmental elements, adjacent land uses, and other
traffic on the road. These are, in general, all readily apparent factors. Warning signs
placed on the roadway can alert drivers to the presence of an unseen or unanticipated
condition. As a result, drivers can operate their vehicle in a reasonable and prudent
manner by adjusting speed for the condition that may be encountered.
In summary, through the use of engineering, educational, and enforcement techniques,
the management of vehicle speed is conducted. Voluntary public compliance with the
posted speed limit is the goal when determining a realistic prima facie speed limit to
establish. The realistic speed limit takes into consideration the normally competent and
careful actions of a reasonable driver and provides for the regulation of unreasonable
behavior by a few individuals. A posted speed limit should be readily accepted by
drivers, be fair and reasonable, be related to risk on the roadway, be determined by the
majority of drivers, and one that has a factual foundation.
DATA:
Palmer · Way is unclassified in the Circulation Element of the General Plan. It is a
two-lane roadway with centerline striping and is 0.38 miles in length. Sidewalk has been
installed on the west side only. Parking is allowed on both sides of Palmer Way except
for the west side of the northerly portion of the road for a distance of 950 feet.
Six driveways serve a mix of businesses along Palmer Way.
Traffic volumes range from 788 vehicles per day near Cougar Drive to 3,310 vehicles per
day near Faraday A venue based upon counts taken in March 2007, as shown on Table A.
TABLE A
24-HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
PALMER WAY
140' s/o Cougar Drive 703 85 788
140' n/o Faraday Avenue 1,720 1,590 3,310
( (
CITY OF CARLSBAD
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
COMMISSION MEETING OF: May 7, 2007 ITEMNO. 6C
(continued)
Palmer Way generally has a straight alignment. The only street intersecting Palmer Way
is Impala Drive and at this location a T-intersection is established. The Palmer
Way/Impala Drive intersection is uncontrolled for Palmer Way and Impala Drive is
controlled with a stop sign. Roadway grades vary from 1.0% to 7.0%.
The 85th percentile speed has been determined throughout the United States to generally
conform to a safe and reasonable speed limit. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (FHWA's MUTCD 2003 Revision 1, as amended for use in California)
provides guidance when a speed limit is to be posted. It states that "the speed limit should
be established at the nearest 10 km/h (5 mph) increment to the 85thpercentile speed.
However, in matching existing conditions with the traffic safety needs of the community,
engineering judgment may indicate the need for a further reduction of 10 km/h (5 mph)."
California Vehicle Code section 627 defines the term "Engineering and Traffic Survey"
and lists its requirements, as follows:
627. (a) "Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of
highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the
Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements
deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.
(2) Accident reports.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
(c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in
addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may
consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the
particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business
district;
(A) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the
contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses
or business structures.
(B) Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a
mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate
dwelling houses or business structures.
(C) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of
separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in
either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
( (
CITY OF CARLSBAD
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
COMMISSION MEETING OF: May 7, 2007
(continued)
ITEMNO. 6C
Staff completed the Engineering and Traffic Survey ( attached) for Palmer Way from
Faraday Avenue to Cougar Drive. Results of the speed survey, contained within the
Engineering and Traffic Survey that was conducted on Palmer Way, are summarized in
TableB.
TABLEB
SPEED SURVEY DATA FOR PALMER WAY
4/11/07 400' n/o Faraday A venue NB/SB 35 28-38 93
The pace speed is the 10 mile per hour range of speeds that contain the highest number of
observed vehicles. Generally, the critical speed is located in the upper range of the pace
speed.
Sections 22357 and 22358 of the California Vehicle Code authorize local authorities to
establish a prima facie speed limit on the basis of the results of an Engineering and
Traffic Survey. The Engineering and Traffic Survey considers such factors as the number
of collisions that have occurred on the road segment, roadway features, adjacent land
uses, driveway locations, traffic volumes, pedestrian volumes, critical speed, horizontal
and vertical alignment, stopping sight distance, and conditions that may not be readily
apparent to the driver.
There has been one reported collision on Palmer Way between March 1, 2005 and
February 28, 2007. This was an injury collision due to an unsafe turning movement
resulting when an inattentive northbound driver on Palmer Way turned into a driveway
located on the west side of Palmer Way in front of a southbound vehicle.
RECOMMENDATION:
Upon review of the results of the Engineering and Traffic Survey, the Traffic Safety
Coordinating Committee recommends establishing a 35 mile per hour prima facie speed
limit upon Palmer Way from Faraday A venue to Cougar Drive.
NECESSARY CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
An ordinance will be required to be adopted by the City Council to establish the 35 mile
per hour prima facie speed limit upon Palmer Way, as recommended.
( (
LOCATION MAP
PROPOSED
SPEED ZONE I
I
I
I
I
I
FARADAY AVE.
NOT TO SCALE ,,-------.
PROJECT NAME PROPOSED SPEED ZONE EXHIBIT
PALMER WAY -FARADAY A VENUE TO COUGAR DRIVE 1
DRAl+N BY: SCOTT EVANS. CARLSBAD fNG/NffRING DE:PT. J/27/07 C:\TRAmC\SPffD ZONES\SPEE:D ZONE-PALMER WAY.DWG
( CITY OF CARLSBAD
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
STREET: Palmer Way
LIMITS: Cougar Drive to Faraday Avenue
A. Prevailing Speed Data:
Date of Speed Survey
Location of Speed Survey
85th Percentile
10 MPH Pace
Percent in Pace
Posted S eed Limit
B. Midblock Accident History:
(3/01/05 through 2/28/07)
Speed-Related Accidents
Total Accidents
Accidents/Million Vehicle Miles (MVM)
California Statewide Accidents/MVM
C. Traffic Factors:
Average Daily Traffic
Traffic Controls
Pedestrian/Bicycle Traffic
Bicycle Lanes
On-Street Parkin
D. Roadway Factors:
Circulation Element Street Classification
Length of Segment
Roadway Width
Number of Lanes
Vertical Alignment
Horizontal Alignment
Sidewalks
Driveways
Street Li htin
Direction: Northbound/Southbound
4/11/07
400 Feet n/o Faraday Avenue
35MPH
28to 38 MPH
93%
No Posted S eed Limit
0
1
1.09 (Rate Based on 3,310 Vehicles)
1 .89 (2004 Rate for Same Type of Roadway)
788 -South of Cougar Drive (3/08/07); 3,310 -North of Faraday Avenue (3/20/07)
Stop Sign Control at Faraday Avenue
Light
None Striped
Parking Prohibited on 950 Feet of West Side at North End
Unclassified
0.38Mi.
52 Feet (Curb-to-Curb)
One Lane Each Direction
Roadway Grades Vary From 1 % to 7%
Relatively Straight
Sidewalk on West Side Only
Six Driveways •
Limited Street Li htin
E. Special Conditions: Northbound motorists must negotiate a 90 degree turn at Cougar Drive. Advanced warning signs inform
northbound motorists of the turn and a sign stating an advisory speed of 15 miles per hour has also been installed. Signs warning
northbound motorists of a curve in the roadway north of Impala Drive have also been installed along with a sign stating an
adviso s eed of 35 miles er hour.
G. Remarks/Conditions Not Readil A arent: Travel lanes are se arated b a double-ellow centerline.
· H. Traffic Engineer's Recommendation (Explanation): This speed zone satisfies the conditions of Section 627 of the California
Vehicle Code and has been prepared and evaluated in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
for Streets and Highways (FHWA's MUTCD 2003 Revision 1, as amended for use in California) with respect to design and
prevailing speeds, accident records, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, intersection and driveway spacing, and roadside and traffic
conditions not readil a arent to the driver. A s eed limit ostin of 35 MPH is found to be a ro riate and ·ustified.
(
DATE: 04/12/07 TIME: 11:00AM TO
WEATHER: Clear & Mild
CITY OF CARLSBAD
SPEED SURVEY
12:30 PM TOTAL VEHICLES:
CRITICAL SPEED: ---------------
LOCATION: Palmer Way~ 400' n/o Faraday Avenue VEHICLES IN PACE:
OBSERVER/RECORDER: M. Rehfeldt ---------PACE SPEED(S):
NONE
POSTED SPEED LIMIT
NORTHBOUND
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL
MPH # % :E # % %tile % #
65
64
63
62
61
60
59
58
57
56
55
54
53
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37 X X
36 X X X
35 X X X X X
34 X X X X X X
33 X X X X X X X
32 X X X X X X X
31 X X X X X X
30 X X X X X
29 X X X X X
28 X X
27 X
26
25 X
24
23
22
21
2 2 100 4 2
98
1 1 98 2 1
2 4 4 4 97 4 2
3 6 7 7 93 8 4
5 10 12 12 86 14 7
6 12 13 13 74 14 7
7 14 13 13 61 12 6
7 14 12 12 48 10 5
6 12 10 10 36 8 4
5 10 9 9 26 8 4
5 10 9 9 17 8 4
2 4 4 4 8 4 2
1 2 3 3 4 4 2
1
1 2 1 1 1
Engineering Department
Transportation Division
100
35 MPH __ ___;_ __ ....::....:. ____ _
93 % -----------
28 TO 38 MPH ----------
SOUTHBOUND
DIRECTION OF TRAVEL
MPH
65
64
63
62
61
60
59
58
57
56
55
54
53
52
51
50
49
48
47
46
45
44
43
42
41
X X 40
39
X 38
X X 37
X X X X 36
X X X X X X X 35
X X X ,X X X X 34
X X X X X X 33
X X X X X 32
X X X X 31
X X X X 30
X X X X 29
X X 28
X X 27
26
25
24
23
22
21